Application�E IDIAN---
Mayor Tammy de Weerd
City Council Members:
Keith Bird Joe Berton
Luke Cavener Genesis Milam
Charlie Rountree David Zaremba
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To ensure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by
the Meridian City Council please submit your
comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall
Attn: Jaycee Holman, City Clerk, by: August 12, 2014
Transmittal Date: July 21, 2014 File No.: MDA 14-008
Hearing Date: August 19, 2014
Request: Public Hearing: Terminate the 3 DA's governing the site AND enter into a new
DA for the purpose of attaching a new concept plan and new provisions relevant to the
proposed Chinden and Linder Crossing Subdivision
By: LEI Engineers
Location of Property or Project: NWC of Chinden Boulevard and N. Linder Road
_Joe Marshall (No FP)
_Scott Freeman (No FP)
_Steven Yearsley (No FP)
_Patrick Oliver (No FP)
_Macy Miller (No FP)
_Tammy de Weerd, Mayor
_City Council
Sanitary Services (No VAR, VAC, FP)
_Building Department/ Rick Jackson
_Fire Department
Police Department
_City Attorney
_City Public Works
_City Planner
—Parks Department
Economic Dev.
Your Concise Remarks:
_ Meridian School District (No FP)
_ Meridian Post Office (FP/PP/SHP only)
_Ada County Highway District
_Ada County Development Services
_Central District Health
_COMPASS (Comp Plan only)
_Nampa Meridian Irrig. District
_Settlers Irrig. District
_ Idaho Power Co. (FP,PP,CUP/SHP only)
_ Qwest (FP/PP/SHP only)
—Intermountain Gas (FP/PP/SHP only)
—Idaho Transportation Dept. (No FP)
_Ada County Ass. Land Records
Downtown Projects:
_Meridian Development Corp.
_Historical Preservation Comm.
South of RR / SW Meridian:
_NW Pipeline
—New York Irrigation District
Boise-Kuna Irrigation District
Boise Project Board of Control/Tim Page
City Clerk's Office • 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642
Phone 208-888-4433 • Fax 208-888-4218 • www.merldiancity.org
�E IDIAN Planning Division
[ A w n COMMISSION & COUNCIL REVIEW APPLICATION
Type of Review Requested (check all that apply)
0 Alternative Compliance
0 Annexation and Zoning
0 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
0 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment
0 Conditional Use Permit
0 Conditional Use Permit Modification STAFFUSE ONLY.
N<DevelopmentAgreement Modification
0 Final Plat -File number(s): T
0 Final Plat Modification
0 Planned Unit Development -
�' reliminary Plat Project name: _C11' A ��l�,.)/g Ct y
0 Private Street -/0 filed: �?-/0 -IN Date complete:
0 Rezone 7-
0 Short plat '.Assigned Planner 13 i. �� I�n✓Sr�S^ p
0 Time Extension (Commission or Council) Related files:17
0 UDC Text Amendment —T
0 Vacation (Council) /� )23 6 .° 4� /0 90 19 Zo37 010`2-33
0 Variance
0 Other Hearing date; 1 1( o Commission 0- Council
Applicant Information
Applicant name: LRV-,60 GAU. �Y Phone:LOSA-.9146-1 OFax:
Applicant address: aj02 Ccs M?, PT Df< Zip: E-mail: iba(0t;N� e,'-er3 coyn
Applicant's interest m pu>pe�y: 0 Own 0 Rent 0 Optioned Other N "OT
I
Owner name. F A F_ H o � ,,,,,S t{-,5os..70.R ({o l i L V Phone: Fax:
Owneraddress:" _ �),ZGd Aveorf Uc-y _Zip:' 9376_S' F, -
mail:
!
Agent name (e.g., �,`�Vu,)i�Ji � �,,,,.,-.,,,,;loper, representative): LfAr�t{\)�rr���
Firm name: Lu :r,Phoneil 'Tax:
Address: _ 0'23 U0 P'j' I42DjZip: E-mail: l/'✓" "
Kt4�121l-)IRN, --L>,!
Primary contact is: 0 Applicant 0w�ier,1 Agent 0 Other
Contact name: : 1
Contact address:
Subject Property Information
Location/street address: S a
Assessor's parcel number(s): Knn1
Township, range, section: T4v� !
Current land use: AC-�racuLvwu
Nbe
Phone: Fax:
`Lip: E-mail:
L' Total acreage: 9 r J �
Current zoning. district: C—
ii
33 H. Broadway; Avenue, Suite 102 • Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facpimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org
I (Rev. 02A)WO13)
Projec subdivision name:
General description of prc
Proposed zoning district(s): NI H
Acres of each zone proposed: N j A
Type of use prooseit (check all that app
0 ResidentialCommercial 0 C
Who will own & maintain the oressurize
Which irrigation district does this propel
Primary irrigation source: 5e" k G
Square footage of landscaped areas to be
Residential
0 Industrial 0 Other
ration system in this development? OW NE)?'s Aw)nYM04
within? 5'—_4X0'5 J'rr 5-' 4t"' 6s I
Secondary; Cl�V o � rtvlc rrw �2
ited (if primary or secondary point of connection is City water): �ACQ,5
Number of residential units: Number of building lots:
Number of common lots: Number of other lots:
Proposed number of dwelling units (for multi family developments only):
1 bedroom: 2-3 bedrooms: 4 or more bedrooms:
Minimum square footage of structure(s) (excll garage):
Minimum property size (s.f):
Gross density (DU/acre-coral land):
Percentage of open space provided:
Percentage of qualified open space acreage:
Type of open space provided in acres (i.'c., It
Amenities provided with this development (i
Type of dwelling(s) proposed: 0 Single' fa
0 Duplexes 0 Multi -family 0 Other
Proposed building height: _
Average property size (s.f):
Net density (DU/acre-excluding roads & alleys):
Acreage of open space:
(See Chapter 3, Article G, for qualified open space)
public; common, etc):
Detached Oj Single-family Attached 0 Townhomes
Non-residential Project Summary (if applicable)
Number of building lots: —1 I OLh r lots:
Gross floor area proposed: N �i Ex's ing (if applicable):
Hours of operation (days and hours): Building height:
i
Percentage of site/project devoted to thel,follosying:
Landscaping: Building: Paving:
Total number of employees: 'Number and ag s of students/children (if applicable):
Total numberof parking spaces provided: Num berof compact spaces provided:
I�
Authorization
Print applicant name: �Ose Qw(t
Applicant signature: Date: r�-
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102 Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsi, mile: (208) 88 P-6 154 • Website: www.meridiancity.org
2 (Rev. 02/))013)
L
Engineers+
Surveyors
June 9, 2014
Planning and Zoning Department
City of Meridian
33 E. Broadway Ave.
Meridian, ID 83642
Re: Linder and Chinden Crossing — Project Narrative
Preliminary Plat and Development Agreement Modification
City of Meridian
To Whom It May Concern,
LEI Engineers and Surveyors, on behalf of FAE Holdings 450070R, LLC, is seeking
approval of a preliminary plat and development agreement modification to subdivide
9.339 acres of land into nine commercial lots and two landscaped common lots. The
subject property is located at 6555 Linder Road in Meridian.
No development of the proposed lots is proposed for approval at this time; the
characteristics of the future commercial development will be determined at the time the
owner seeks building permits. A conceptual site plan has been included in this submittal
as a means to demonstrate the mix of uses that maybe developed in the future
dependant on lot sales.
Access to the commercial subdivision will be from Linder Road and Chinden Boulevard
(US 20-26). The internal road network will consist of a public road extension of West
Island Green Drive from the west property line to Linder Road, and a private road
connection to US 20-26. Idaho Transportation Department has approved the proposed
private approach from US 20-26.
Domestic utilities including water and sewer mains are available at the property
boundary to the south and east of this project. Storm drainage for the public row will be
retained on-site. Power, natural gas, telephone and cable are all available at the project
boundaries. At the time of this submittal discussion with the irrigation district and
neighboring property owners about the possibility of building a pressure irrigation pump
station are ongoing. Unfortunately, the project lies at the end of the irrigation lateral that
serves it and there may not be sufficient water and delivery to support a pressure
system, municipal water may need to be utilized to serve the property.
Project Amenities will include over one and a half acres of dedicated landscaping along
the project perimeter, with 35' landscape buffers on both Chinden and Linder Roads and
services Includes a 25' landscape buffer to the north abutting the existing residential neighborhood.
• [ngineeing Individual pad sites will be required to meet the City of Meridian's landscaping
Civil requirements at the time of building permit application.
slrncr,rpi
• surveying
Land Planning
This property has had three different development agreements in the past, at that time
this property was attached to a much larger parcel to the west that is now a part of the
S ug'illil e y u r s Spurwing Country Club. At this time the developer feels that it would be prudent to
create a new development agreement that would govern only this property and eliminate
any confusion or extraneous requirements that may exist.
There are no variances being requested for this project at this time.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter please and feel free to contact me by
phone at 208-846-9600 or by e-mail at (bailey@lei-eng.com.
Sincerely,
LEIeers +Surveyors
Laren Bailey
Principal/Planner
.So PVIces 1110tirle:
° L-ngineering
Civil
5iructural
Surveying
• Land Planning
ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich AMOUNT 19,00 4
BOISE IDAHO 03/03/2014 02:43 PM
DEPUTY Victoria Bailey
SimpliRECO leED-R]EQ Recording IIIIIIIVIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVIIIIIIIIIII
RL�CORDEI)-REQUEST OF
TITLEONE BOISE 114015777
TitleOne
a title
..... screw & �cscrow co.
Order Number: 13230336
WARRANTY DEED
For Value Received,
Sea 2 Sea LLC, an Idaho limited liability company, the Grantor, does hereby grant, bargain sell and
convey unto, FAE Holdings 450070R, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company, whose current address is
2700 Airport Way, Boise, ID 83705, the Grantee, the following described premises, In Ada County, Idaho,
To Wit:
Parcel B of Record of Survey No. 7519 recorded August 11, 2006 as Instrument No. 106129474,
records of Ada County, Idaho, being a parcel of land located In the South half of the Southeast
quarter of Section 23, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being a
portion of Lot 1 in Block 1 of Brandt Subdivision, according the official plat thereof, filed in Book 59
of Plats at Pages 5785 and 5786, and all that parcel of land, as shown on a Record of Survey,
recorded as Instrument No. 94079392, records of Ada County, Idaho, described as follows:
Commencing at a point, marking the comer common to Sections 23, 24, 25 and 26, Township 4
North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, from which.the quarter corner common to said Sections 23
and 26 bears North 69°38'47" West 2629,97 feet; thence along the centerline of N. Linder Road
North 00°4729" East 40,00 feet to a point on the centerline of N. Linder Road; thence
North 89039'09" West 60.01 feet to a point on the Northerly right-of-way line of W. Chinden
Boulevard, being the Point of Beginning; thence along said Northerly line the following courses:
Northwesterly along said curve to the left having a radius of 34417,48 feet, an arc length of 21,21
feet, through a central angle of 0°02'07" and a chord bearing and distance of North 89°37'43" West
21.21 feet; thence on a line tangent from said curve
North 89°38'47" West 906.82 feet; thence leaving said Northerly line
North 00022'17" East 342,60 feet; thence
South 8904175" East 50.71 feet; thence
North 00042'47" East 35.95 feet to the Southwesterly comer of Lot 6, Block 1 of said subdivision;
thence along the Southerly line of said Lot 6 and the Southerly line of Lot 5, Block 1 of said
subdivision
South 8805033" East 441.26 feet to the Southeasterly comer of said Lot 5; thence along the Easterly
line of said Lot 5
North 00047'29" East 196.40 feet to the Southwesterly corner of Lot 3, Block 1 of said subdivision;
thence along the Southerly line of said Lot 3 and Lot 2, Block 1 of said subdivision
South 69°12'31" East 465.61 feet to the Westerly right-of-way fine of N, Linder Road; thence along
said Westerly right-of-way Ifne the following courses:
South 00°4729" West 25.00 feet; thence
South 89012131" East 33.00 feet to the centerline of N. Linder Road; thence along said centerline
South 0004729" West 170.00 feet; thence
North 89012'31" West'33.00 feet; thence
South 03008'42" West 170.46 feet; thence
W=mty Dccd
Page I of
Ti.tleone
..r
a tltic escrow co.
Order Number:13230336 5"7-1-T ;>
WARRANTY DEED
For Value Received,
ELECTRONICALLY RECORDED
STAMPED FIRST PAGE NOW
INCORPORATED AS PART OF
THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT.
Sea 2 Sea LLC, an Idaho limited liability company, the Grantor, does hereby grant, bargain sell and
convey unto, FAE Holdings 450070R, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company, whose current address is
2700 Airport Way, Boise, ID 83705, the Grantee, the following described premises, In Ada County, Idaho,
To Will:
Parcel B of Record of Survey No. 7511 recorded August 11, 2006 as Instrument No, 108129474,
records of Ada County, Idaho, being a parcel of land located In the South half of the Southeast
quarter of Section 23, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being a
portion of Lot 1 in Block 1 of Brandt Subdivision, according the official plat thereof, filed In Book 59
of Plats at Pages 5785 and 5786, and all that parcel of land, as shown on a Record of Survey,
recorded as Instrument No. 94079392, records of Ada County, Idaho, described as follows:
Commencing at a point, marking the corner common to Sections 23, 24, 25 and 26, Township 4
North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, from which the quarter corner common to said Sections 23
and 26 bears North 89038'47" West 2629.97 feet; thence along the centerline of N. Linder Road
North 00°47'29 East 40.00 feet to a point on the centerline of N. Linder Road; thence
North 89039'09" West 60.01 feet to a point on the Northerly right-of-way line of W, Chlnden
Boulevard, being the Point of Beginning; thence along said Northerly One the following courses:
Northwesterly along said curve to the left having a radius of 34417.48 feet, an arc length of 21,21
feet, through a central angle of 0002'07" and a chord bearing and distance of North 89°37'43" West
21.21 feet; thence on a line tangent from said curve
North 89"38'47" West 906.82 feet; thence leaving said Northerly line
North 00°22'17" East 342.60 feet; thence
South 89041'25" East 50.71 feet; thence
North 00042'47" East 35.95 feet to the Southwesterly corner of Lot 6, Block 1 of said subdivision;
thence along the Southerly line of said Lot 6 and the Southerly fine of Lot 5, Block 1 of said
subdivision
South 88050133" East 441.26 feet to the Southeasterly corner of said Lot 5; thence along the Easterly
line of said Lot 5
North 00°47'29" East 196.40 feet to the Southwesterly corner of Lot 3, Block 1 of said subdivision;
thence along the Southerly line of said Lot 3 and Lot 2, Block 1 of said subdivision
South 89°12'31" East 465,61 feet to the Westerly fight -of -way line of N. Linder Road; thence along
said Westerly right-of-way line the following courses:
South 00147'29" West 25.00 feet; thence
South 89012'31" East 33.00 feet to the centerline of N. Linder Road; thence along said centerline
South 00*47'29" West 170.00 feet; thence
North 89012'31" West 33.00 feet; thence
South 03°08'42" West 170.46 feet; thence
Wnrranty Deed
Page 1 of 4
South 0094729" West 179.99 feet; thence
South 45°34'41" West 28,40 feet to the Point of Beginning,
Excepting Therefrom:
A tract of land conveyed to Ada County Highway District by Warranty Deed recorded May 4, 2011 as
Instrument No. 111037171, records of Ada County, Idaho, being a part of Lot 1, Block 1, of Brandt
Subdivision (a subdivision on file In Book 59 of Plats at Pages 5785 and 5786, records of Ada
County, Idaho), situated in the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 23, Township 4
North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, described as follows;
Commencing at an aluminum cap which monuments the Southeast corner of sold Section 23, which
bears South 0047'25" West a distance of 2647.04 feet from a brass cap which monuments the East
quarter corner of said Section 23; thence following the Easterly line of said Southeast quarter of the
Southeast quarter of Section 23 and the centerline of N. Linder Road
North 0°4725" East a distance of 70.00 feet to a point; thence leaving said Easterly line and said
centerline
North 89°38'43" West a distance of 40,00 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way line of N. Linder
Road, and being the Point of Beginning; thence leaving said Westerly right-of-way line
North 89038'43" West a distance of 56,00 feet to a point; thence
North 48°26'55" East a distance of 38.79 feet to a point; thence
North 2"56'16" East a distance of 149.50 feet to a point; thence
North 6044'55" East a distance of 170.77 feet to a point; thence
North 0047'25" East a distance of 75.53 feet to a point; thence
North 2045'14" East a distance of 114.90 feet to a point on the Northerly line of said Lot 1, Block 1, of
Brandt Subdivision; thence following said Northerly line
South 89"12'35" East a distance of 7.06 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way line of N. Linder
Road; thence leaving said Northerly line and following said Westerly right-of-way line
South 004725" West a distance of 25.00 feet to a point; thence leaving said Westerly right-of-way
line
South 89012'35" East a distance of 33.00 feet to a point on the said Easterly line of the said
Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 23 and the centerline of N, Linder Road;
thence following said Easterly line and said centerline
South 0047'25" West a distance of 170.00 feet to a point; thence leaving said easterly line and said
centerline
North 89012'35" West a distance of 33.00 feet to a point on the said Westerly right-of-way line of N.
Linder Road; thence following said Westerly right-of-way line
South 3008'38" West a distance of 170.46 feet to a point; thence following said Westerly right-of-way
line
South 0047'25" West a distance of 169.99 feet to the Point of Beginning,
Further Excepting Therefrom:
A tract of tend conveyed to the State of Idaho, Idaho Transportation Department, by and through the
Idaho Transportation Board by Warranty Deed recorded May 19, 2011 as Instrument No. 111041347,
records of Ada County, Idaho, being a part of Lot 1, Block 1, of Brandt Subdivision (a subdivision on
file in Book 59 of Plats at Pages 5785 and 5786, records of Ada county, Idaho), situated In the
Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 23, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise
Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, described as follows;
Commencing at an aluminum cap which monuments the Southeast corner of said Section 23, which
bears South 89038'43" East a distance of 2630.00 feet from an aluminum cap Which monuments the
South quarter corner of said Section 23; thence following the Southerly line of said Southeast
quarter'of the Southeast quarter of Section 23
WorrantyDeed
Page 2 of 4
North 80938'43" West a distance of 59,71 feet to a point; thence leaving said Southerly line
North 0°21'17" East a distance of 39,99 feet to a point on the Northerly right-of-way line of W.
Chlnden Boulevard, and being the Point of Beginning; thence following said Northerly right-of-way
line 21,21 feet along a circular curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 34417,48 feet, a
central angle of 0°02'07", a chord bearing of North 89037'39" West and a chord distance of 21.21 feet
to a point; thence folloviing said Northerly right-of-way line
North 89°3843" West a distance of 906,82 feet to a point; thence leaving said Northerly right-of•way
line
North 0°22'21" East a distance of 30,00 feet to a point; thence
South 8903843" East a distance of 948.26 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way line of N.
Linder Road; thence following said Westerly right-of-way line
South 004725" West a distance of 10,01 feet to a point; thence following said Westerly right-of-way
tine
South 45035'52" West a distance of 28,40 feet to the Point of Beginning.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, with their appurtenances unto the said Grantee, its heirs and
assigns forever, And the said Grantor does hereby covenant to and with the said Grantee, that Grantor Is
the owner In fee simple of said premises; that they are free from all encumbrances EXCEPT those to which
this conveyance is expressly made subject and those made, suffered or done by the Grantee; and subject to
all existing patent reservations, easements, rlght(s) of way, protective covenants, zoning ordinances, and
applicable building codes, laws and regulations, general taxes and assessments, including Irrigation and
Utility assessments (If any) for the current year, which are not due. and payable, and that Grantor will warrant
and defend the same from all lawful claims whatsoever. Whenever the context so requires, the singular
number Includes the plural,
Dated:
Sea 2ISea, LLg1 an Idaho limited liability company
By. FgothIJ Xnlohts, L.L,C„ an Idaho limited liability company, Its Managing Member
Manager
Warranty Deed
Page 3 of 4
STATE OF Idaho
ss,
County of.
On this _24tday of February, 2014, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public
in and for said State, personally appeared Creston Thornton, known or identified to me to
be the Manager of Foothill Knights, L.L.C., said limited liability company known tome
to be the Managing Member of Sea 2 Sea, LLC, the limited liability company that
executed the instrument and acknowledged to me that he exccuted the same for and on
behalf of said limited liability company and that said limited liability company executed
on behalf of Sea 2 Sea, LL, and that said limited liability company executed it,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official
seal the day and year in this certificate first above written.
ARY PUBLIC fo�rl d
My Commission Expires: 3�
p�mulr�� r
ECo
i. apTARy :O9C1
�U i; AUBL�G
•'Oe.
..........' QZ
�FtOF:`O��`*R
Wwn ty Deed
Page 4 of 4
AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST
1
STATE QF41)*iI9- )
COUNTY OF *"V)
)
(SCC2-F LW -e-
1, FAE Holdings 450070R, LLC 2700 Airport Way
Meridian
(name) Idaho (address)
(city) (state)
being first duly sworn upon, oath, depose and say:
1. That I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant my
permission to:
Laren Bailey, LEI Engineering 2040 S. Eagle Road, Meridian, Idaho 83642
(name) (address)
to submit the accompanying application(s) pertaining to that property.
2. I agree to indemnify, defend and hold the City of Meridian and its employees harmless
from any claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements contained
herein or as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application.
3. I hereby grant permission to City of Meridian staff to enter the subject property for the
purpose of site inspections related to processing said application(s).
Dated this 4M sy of June 20 14
qg I�
(Signature)
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and ye lrs aggbove w ' ten. )
Notary Pub)
r
I Public,
RICHARD LIMB (Notary J?ubli or -TR
� � a Camn4sabnU80823 f
I 6y Cummis*n EVkea Sa(4,{. I- LA -4 Cg , -1 I
Doomter17, 2018 Residing at: ,
��� ... Sate
�of Utah J
My Commission Expires:
33 E Broadway Suite 210 • Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6678 • Website: www.meridiancity.org
2i34NIl b34NIl
c
a
v
0
N
IL p
J
Lli
>
F
Z O
N
Q F-
0
0
0
0
0
0
M
?
o
LO
Z
W
r
W
m O
U
c=a
K
In
0
0
0
0
0
0
M
Geotechnical Investigation
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)
Highway 20 and Linder Road
Meridian, Idaho
Project No. 05B -G1132.1
Prepared for
Sea 2 Sea, LLC
December 5, 2005
(Revision 1)
Prepared for
Sea 2 Sea, LLC
757 W. Bankside Drive
Eagle, Idaho 83616
Attention: Bryan D. Martin, PE
AMERICAN
�f
L J1 J
T E C H N I C S
Geotechnical Investigation
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)
Highway 20 and Linder Road
Meridian, Idaho
Prepared by.
American Geotechnics
Todd Arnold, EIT
Geotechnical Engineer
American Geotechnics
American Geotechnics
Project No. 05B -G1132.1
Vaughn Thurgood, PE
Geotechnical Engineer
5260 Chinden Blvd. a Boise, ID 83714 • (208) 658-8700
2300 N Yellowstone Hwy, Suite 203 • Idaho Falls, ID 83401 • (208) 523-8710
Geotechnical Investigation A M E R I C A N
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)
Project No. 05B -G1132.1
1
December 5, 2005 T E C H N I C S
Page -1-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION I
1.1 Purpose and Scope of Work.....................................................................................1
1.2 Project Description...................................................................................................1
1.3 References................................................................................................................2
1.4 Important Information Regarding this Geotechnical Report ....................................2
2.0 METHODS OF STUDY 3
2.1 Field Explorations....................................................................................................3
2.2 Laboratory Evaluation.; ............................................................................................ 3
3.0
INTERPRETATION 4
4.1
3.1
Geology
.....................................................................................................................6
....................................................................................................................4
4.2
3.2
Subsurface Profile
4.2.1 Erosion Potential........................................................................................6
....................................................................................................4
3.3
Groundwater
4.2.3 General Fill
............................................................................................................4
3.4
Site Ground Motion
4.2.4 Backfilling Utilities Trenches .....................................................................7
.................................................................................................5
4.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6
4.1
General
.....................................................................................................................6
4.2
Earthwork..................................................................................................................6
4.2.1 Erosion Potential........................................................................................6
4.2.2 General Site Preparation...........................................................................6
4.2.3 General Fill
................................................................................................7
4.2.4 Backfilling Utilities Trenches .....................................................................7
4.2.5 Subgrade Preparation, Fill and Drainage far Pavements .........................8
4.2.6 Subgrade Preparation, Structural Fill and Drainage for Buildings ..........
8
4.3
Foundations..............................................................................................................8
4.3.1 Spread Footings.........................................................................................8
4.4
Interior Slab-On-Grade............................................................................................9
4.5
Pavements..............................................................................................................11
4.6
Subsurface Disposal of Storm Water.....................................................................12
5.0 CLOSURE
16
5.1
Limitations
.............................................................................................................16
American Geotechnics
Geotechnical Investigation
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)
Project No. 05B -G 1132.1
December 5, 2005
Page - 2 -
APPENDICES
A Vicinity Map
Site Plan
Photos
B Logs of Exploration
Laboratory Test Reports
A M E R I C A N
Adk1k
T E ( H N I C S
C Important Information about Your Geotechnical Engineering Report
Application for Authorization to Use by Other Parties
American Geotechnics
Geotechnical Investigation
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)
Project No. 05B -GI 132.1
December 5, 2005
Page -1 -
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose and Scope of Work
MER�A;
�
1
gel
TECHNICS
This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation performed for the proposed
Brandt Commercial Development. The proposed development is located on the South West
comer of Linder Road and Highway 20. The property is in the Northeast'/4 of the northeast 1/4 of
Section 26, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian. A vicinity map showing the site
location is included as Figure 1 in Appendix A.
In general, the purposes of this investigation were to evaluate the subsurface conditions and to
provide geotechnical recommendations relating to site preparation, earthwork, pavement,
subsurface disposal of storm water, and foundations for commercial buildings. This report was
prepared solely for geotechnical purposes, and does not address any environmental issues.
The work performed for this report was authorized by Bryan D. Martin and was conducted in
accordance with our original site investigation proposal dated September 23, 2005.
1.2 Project Description
We understand that the proposed construction will consist of a 10 -acre commercial development.
A plan configuration of the proposed construction and its relative position on the site property are
shown on Figure 2 in Appendix A.
At the time of our investigation, the proposed site was undeveloped agricultural land. The
topography was relatively flat.
We understand that that the proposed commercial development will be constructed to the
following criteria:
• Cuts or fills for site grading are not expected to exceed 5 feet.
• All sewage will routed to an off-site sewage treatment system.
American Geotechnics
Geotechnical Investigation
Leroy BrandtFamily Parcel (10 acres)
Project No. 05B -G1132.1
December 5, 2005
Page - 2 -
• All storm water will be disposed of on site.
• All buildings will be single -story structures.
• No retaining walls are planned for the general development,
AMERICAN
r f
TECHNICS
If the above criteria are modified, then our office should be immediately notified so that we may
make any necessary revisions to our recommendations.
1.3 References
The following information was provided to American Geotechnics and serves as the basis of our
understanding of the project and our scope:
• AutoCAD file entitled Brandt Commercial Development Pre -Layout and dated October
21, 2005 by Toothman-Orton Engineering.
1.4 Important Information Regarding this Geotechnical Report
Appendix C contains important information relating to the role of American Geotechnccs on this
project and the appropriate use of this report,
This report is intended to provide geotechnical information to project designers. This report may
be provided to the contractor as reference information, but is not intended to be a substitute for
properly prepared contract drawings and specifications. American Geotechnccs requests the
opportunity to review final drawing and specifications for comparison with our understanding of
the site conditions and project geotechnical requirements.
American Geotechnics
Geotechnical Investigation
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)
Project No. 05B -G1132.1
December 5, 2005
Page - 3 -
2.0 METHODS OF STUDY
2.1 Field Explorations
A M E R I C A N
I ® f 1C ee
TECHNICS
The subsurface soil conditions were explored by excavating 5 test pits (TP -21 tluu TP -25) within
the proposed site to depths of 20.0 to 21.5 feet below the existing site grade. The approximate
location of the test pits are shown on Figure 2 in Appendix A. Logs of the subsurface conditions,
as encountered in the test pits, were recorded at the time of the field work by American
Geotechnics, and are presented in Appendix B.
Excavation of the test pits was accomplished with a standard track mounted excavator. The test
pits were excavated by American General Contractors of Meridian, Idaho. Soil samples
recovered from the test pits were identified, described, and classified using ASTM D 2488 as a
guide. Representative samples were packaged and transported to our laboratory for testing.
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) data was obtained at each of the test pit locations using the
Coips of Engineers penetrometer (ASTM D6951).
2.2 Laboratory Evaluation
Representative samples were selected for laboratory testing to evaluate the pertinent physical and
engineering properties of the soils. The laboratory test results are presented on the boring logs at
their respective depth or in the body of this report. The following test methods and procedures
were utilized:
• ASTM D2488 —Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes
• USDA— Guide for the Textural Classification of Soil
• ASTM D2434 —Permeability of Granular Soils using the Constant Head Permeameter
• IDAHO T-8 — R -Value
American Geotechnics
Geotechnical Investigation
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)
Project No, 05B -G1132.1
December 5, 2005
Page - 4 -
3.0 INTERPRETATION
3.1 Geology
�M E R� A 1
TECHNICS
This general area commonly has three to six feet of loess overlying Whitney Terrace sands and
gravels with intermittent hard pan layers. (Othberg et.al,1992)
3.2 Subsurface Profile
A generalized subsurface profile was developed for this project to provide a basis for discussion
of soil conditions for the proposed facilities. This profile is based on the field test data and
exploration logs, and the laboratory testing program conducted by American Geoteehnics.
Silt with Sand was encountered in all test pits. This stratum extended to depths
from 6.0 feet to 7.0 feet below the
surface.
II Sands and Gravels were encountered in all of the test pits and extended from 6.0
feet to bottom of test pits.
*See the logs of exploration (Appendix B) for detailed subsurface information,
3.3 Groundwater
Groundwater was observed at the time of our field investigation to a depth of 20 feet below the
existing ground surface. American Geotechncas installed peizometers at three of the test pit
locations (TP -23, TP -24 and TP -25).
It should be noted that groundwater levels may fluctuate seasonally in response to precipitation,
land use, irrigation and other factors. Monitoring of groundwater fluctuation was beyond the
scope of this investigation.
American Geotechnics
Geotechnical Investigation
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)
Project No. 05B -GI 132.1
December 5, 2005
Page - 5 -
3.4 Site Ground Motion
rA' NrA N
,
TECHNICS
For the purpose of developing earthquake spectral response accelerations, this project site is
classified as Site• Class C, for use with the 2000 International Building Code.
American Geotechnics
Geotedmical Investigation A M E R I C A N
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)
•Project No. 05B-G1132.1
December 5, 2005 T E C H N I C S
Page - 6 -
4.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 General
Based on the results of our field and laboratory investigations, it is our opinion that the site is
suitable for the proposed construction. During our site investigation we observed a large wind
row of straw approximately 300 feet long by 20 feet wide, as noted in the photo log. Special
attention needs to be given to the proper removal and handling of this large mass of organic
matter at the site. Mixing of the organics with the native materials at the site would lead to
significant concerns regarding settlement and drainage. Specific recommendations regarding site
preparation and foundation design are presented in the following sections.
If any revisions in the nature, or design, of the proposed buildings are made at a later date that
significantly alter the present definition of the project, the recommendations within the following
sections shall be subject to review by American Geotechnics, and may be modified as deemed
necessary.
4.2 Earthwork
4.2.1 Erosion Potential
Land disturbance from construction activities will increase the potential for erosion. Sediment
leaving a construction site is considered a pollutant by the Environmental Protection Agency. A
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan should be prepared for this project.
4.2.2 General Site Preparation
Prior to commencing site grading or foundation excavations, fill areas should be stripped of all
- -- vegetation,-fill.and debris. Based on our field observations, we estimate the depth of required
stripping to be approximately 12 -inches or deeper.
American Geotechnics
Geotechnical Investigation
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)
Project No. 05B -G1132.1
December 5, 2005
Page - 7 -
�MER�A;
TE(HNI[S
After the removal of all vegetation and prior to any placement of general fill, the exposed
subgrade should be uniformly scarified to a minimum depth of 8 inches, moisture -conditioned as
necessary, and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the maximum dry density in accordance with
ASTM D698.
4.2.3 General Fill '
Fill placed to develop building pads should meet the requirements for general fill. General fill
used for site grading may be obtained from on-site excavations or approved borrow sources.
General fill could classify according to ASTM D2487 as GW, GP, GC, GM, SW, SP, SC, SM,
ML, CL (or combinations of these such as SP -SM) materials. In addition, the general fill
material should have a maximum particle size less than 4 inches and shall be free of excess
moisture, organic matter and debris.
Materials that are frozen, contaminated, contain excess moisture, organic matter (such as .
strippings or roots), _trash, debris, stones larger than 4 inches, or that classify by ASTM D2487 as
CH, MH, PT, OL, and OH are not suitable for general fill.
General fill should be placed in 8 -inch maximum loose horizontal lifts and compacted to at least
95% of the maximum dry density as determined by the ASTM D698 - Standard Proctor
Compaction Test.
4.2.4 Backfilling Utilities Trenches
Materials obtained from required project excavations and meeting the requirements for General
Fill may be used to backfill utilities trenches. Backfill should be placed in uniform horizontal
layers not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness. Excavations must be dewatered prior to
backfilling; each layer of backfill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum
--Iabor tdry dry density as determined by ASTM D698. Jetting or flooding of the backfill material
in utility trenches should not be permitted.
American Geotechnics
Geotechnical Investigation
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)
Project No. 05B -G1132.1
December 5, 2005
Page - 8 -
A M E R I C A N
r -I 1
►.`. �►.�J
TECHNICS
4.2.S Subgrade Preparation, Fill and Drainage for Pavements
For this report, the subgrade for roadways and parking areas is defined as the upper 8 inches of
soil supporting the subbase or aggregate base layers. Subgrade soils should be uniformly
scarified to a depth of 8 inches, moisture -conditioned as necessary and compacted to at least 95
percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D698.
Any material placed as embankment fill in pavement areas should conform to the requirements
outlined in the General Fill section of this report.
The finish surface of flexible (asphalt) pavement should be graded at least 2 to 3 percent to drain
towards storm water conveyance (e.g. gutters, drip inlets) or disposal facilities.
4.2.6 Subgrade Preparation, Structural Fill andDrainagefor Buildings
Fill placed within the building footprint and 5 -feet beyond the building lines should meet the
requirements for General Fill.
Any fill needed to bring the building area to design grade should be placed before the
foundations are excavated. This will facilitate more uniform placement and compaction of the fill
and also reduce differential settlement of the structure.
Fill in the building construction area should be placed in maximum 8 -inch loose lifts and
compacted to at least 95% of the maximum dry density as determined by the ASTM D698. Each
lift of general fill under building should be properly documented for adequate density.
4.3 Foundations
- _ 4.3.1-. Spread Footings
Based on the results of the subsurface investigation, conventional spread footings founded in the
native Stratum I material or properly compacted general fill may be proportioned for an
American Geotechnccs
Geotechnical Investigation
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)
Project No. 05B -GI 132.1
December 5, 2005
Page - 9 -
A M E R I( A N
rA �f 1
T E f H N I( S
allowable net bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. This allowable net bearing pressure is applicable
provided that:
• continuous wall footings are at least 16 inches wide;
• column pad foundations are at least 24 inches square;
• exterior footings are placed at least 24 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade for
frost protection;
• the base of the foundation excavations are observed and probed in the field by our
geotechnical engineer prior to placement of any formwork, reinforcement steel, or
concrete; and any soft or loose soil pockets encountered at the base of the footing
excavations are removed and replaced with lean concrete or properly compacted fill.
Spread footings designed in accordance with these criteria would be expected to experience
maximum post construction settlement of 1 inch or less, with differential settlements of %2 -inch
or less. A one-third increase of the net allowable bearing pressure may be used for transient wind
or seismic loads.
4.4 Interior Slab -On -Grade
Slab -on -grade floors can be used at the site, provided the subgrade is properly prepared. Any
organic topsoil; vegetation, or loose fill material should first be stripped from the building area.
If soft or loose soil pockets are detected that cannot be effectively compacted by repeated passes
of the compactor, these areas should be overexcavated and backfilled with properly compacted
structural fill material. For design purposes, a modulus of subgrade reaction of 180 poi can be
.-assumed-for-property-prepared floor slab areas supported on firm -native soils -or -properly- - -,--..
compacted structural fill.
American Geotechnics
Geotechnical Investigation A M E R I C A N
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)
Project No. 05B -G1132.1
December 5, 2005 T E C H N I C S
Page -10 -
For slabs on grade without moisture sensitive floor covering, the following minimum section is
recommended:
9 Granular base should be placed as a leveling course over the subgrade. The granular
base should he compacted to at least 95% of the maximum dry density as determined
byASTM D1557.
• Compacted subgrade in the building construction area should be prepared as described
in Section 4.2.2 of this report.
For slabs -on -grade with moisture -sensitive floor covering, the following minimum section (listed
in descending order) is recommended:
afYC K ,It.,
A."i O""JA",
R$ WRE11 W�.,
COM I Engineer
Concrete with Reinforcement
Granular Base
4
1
Compacted Subgrade
8
9 Granular base should be placed as a leveling course over the subgrade. The granular
base should he compacted to at least 95% of the maximum dry density as determined
byASTM D1557.
• Compacted subgrade in the building construction area should be prepared as described
in Section 4.2.2 of this report.
For slabs -on -grade with moisture -sensitive floor covering, the following minimum section (listed
in descending order) is recommended:
afYC K ,It.,
Concrete with Reinforcement—
Computed by Structural Engineer
Blotter
3-1/2
Vapor Retarder
....
-Choker -
1/2
Granular Base
4
Compacted Subgrade
8
American Geotechnics
Geotechnical Investigation
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)
Project No. 05B -G1132.1
December 5, 2005
Page -11-
A M E RI C a N
�L` 9
TECHNICS
• The purpose of the blotter layer is to absorb excess moisture from the concrete to
permit the earliest placement of impermeable floor coatings (urethane, epoxy, or acrylic
terrazzo) or floor -covering adhesive. Blotter should be a well -graded 3/8 -inch -minus
granular material. Blotter should be lightly moist and compacted with two passes of a
vibratory plate or vibratory roller. The blotter layer should not be allowed to become
saturated prior to placement of the concrete slab.
• Vapor retarder should have a permeance of less than 0.3 US perms as determined by
ASTM E 96. A 10 -mil polyethylene film or a Rufoo 400 SSB by Raven Industries is
recommended. To reduce slab curl potential, concrete should not be placed directly on
the vapor retarder.
• Choker should be a clean sand material. The choker layer minimizes puncturing of the
vapor retarder by the granular base material.
Special precautions should be taken during the placement and curing of all concrete slabs.
Excessive slump caused by a high water -cement ratio of the concrete and/or improper curing
procedures used during either hot or cold weather could lead to excessive shrinkage, cracking or
curling in the slabs. We recommend that all concrete placement and curing operations be
performed in accordance with the American Concrete Institute (ACI) Manual and under the
observation of International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) certified technicians.
To reduce the effects of differential movement, it is recommended that floor slabs be separated
from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints. The concrete strength, slab thickness,
reinforcement, joint design, and joint layout should be addressed in the contract documents.
_ 4.5 Pavements
The Idaho Department of Transportation (ITD) design procedure, along with our laboratory
testing and local experience, was used to develop the following flexible pavement sections. The
American Geotechnics
Geotechnical Investigation
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)
Project No. 05B -G1132.1
December 5, 2005
Page -12 -
�MER�Aki
T E f H H I f S
pavement sections are based on a Traffic index of 4 for light traffic areas, a Traffic Index of 6 for
heavy track traffic areas, and a subgrade R -Value of 5.
One year after construction, we recommend that a seal coat be applied. The seal coat will inhibit
water intrusion into the subgrade and will promote longevity of the pavement section.
4.6 Subsurface Disposal of Storm Water
A generalized subsurface profile for this project is presented in Section 3.2 of this report.
Groundwater levels are discussed in Section 3.3 of this report.
Based on the information obtained from the,site investigation, Stratum II is recommended for
subsurface disposal of storm water. The permeability or thickness of the stratum may vary
substantially over short distances. We recommend that our geotechnical engineer review the
condition of bottom of drainage facilities excavations to assess consistency with the
observations and measurements noted herein.
Infiltration measurements were obtained in the laboratory using a constant head permeameter per
ASTM D2434.
American Geotechnics
Asphalt Pavement per ISPWC
3.0
2.5
(Class III Plant Mix)
Crushed Aggregate Base
3.0
3.0
(3/4 -inch minus)
Granular Subbase
15.0
7.0
(Pit -run)
Compacted Subgrade
8.0
8.0
One year after construction, we recommend that a seal coat be applied. The seal coat will inhibit
water intrusion into the subgrade and will promote longevity of the pavement section.
4.6 Subsurface Disposal of Storm Water
A generalized subsurface profile for this project is presented in Section 3.2 of this report.
Groundwater levels are discussed in Section 3.3 of this report.
Based on the information obtained from the,site investigation, Stratum II is recommended for
subsurface disposal of storm water. The permeability or thickness of the stratum may vary
substantially over short distances. We recommend that our geotechnical engineer review the
condition of bottom of drainage facilities excavations to assess consistency with the
observations and measurements noted herein.
Infiltration measurements were obtained in the laboratory using a constant head permeameter per
ASTM D2434.
American Geotechnics
Geotechnical Investigation
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)
Project No. 05B -G1132.1
December 5, 2005
Page -13 -
A M E R I ( A N
rA :1 WrA ki
It Ail k1k
T E( H N I( S
The following tables present the infiltration rates that were measured from each test pit location
and the maximum infiltration rate that we recommend for design. Infiltration rates are subject to
variability in the soil stratum and the level of care exercised during construction of the storm,
water disposal facilities. The infiltration rate used to design the water disposal facilities should
be reduced by an additional measure, based upon the designer's understanding of quality control
that will occur during construction and the level of preventative maintenance that the facilities
will receive after construction.
American Geotachnics
Rig..
N�,
Soil Type
)4fesur))ed'In95�t1i`4ltrption Rate
Mai Reeompienilecl Desigp i'
vfT
0
e" o
A
oi
I
I I%
70;
0-7.0
1
Silt with Sand
Not tested
n/a
7.0-20.6
111
Poorly Graded
5.3
3.2
Gravel with Sand
*Groundwater encountered at 20.4' on November 22, 2005 In TP -21.
American Geotachnics
ayer
Soil Type
)4fesur))ed'In95�t1i`4ltrption Rate
Mai Reeompienilecl Desigp i'
I
I I%
70;
0-6.0
1
Silt with Sand
Not tested
Ida
6.0-20.6
in
Poorly Graded
2.1
1.3
Gravel with Sand
*Groundwater encountered at 20.0' on November 22, 2005 in TP -22.
American Geotachnics
Geotechnical Investigation
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)
Project No. 05B-GI132.1
December 5, 2005
Page -14 -
A MERI A;
TECHNICS
American Geotechnics
0-6.0
1
Silt with Sand
Not tested
n/a
6.0-21.6
Ill
Poorly Graded
2.1
1.3
Poorly Graded
11.0
Gravel with Sand
*Groundwater encountered at 21.4' on November 22, 2005 in TP -23.
American Geotechnics
0-7.0
1
Silt with Sand
Not tested
n/a
7.0-20.6
Ill
Poorly Graded
11.0
6.6
Gravel with Sand
*Groundwater encountered at 20.0' on November 22, 2005 in TP -24.
American Geotechnics
Geotechnical Investigation
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)
Project No. 05)3-0 1132.1
December 5, 2005
Page - 15 -
A M E R A;
`� 1•J
TECHNICS
Subsurface materials at the site were observed to be variable. If the proposed storm water
facilities are not located within 20 feet of the test pit location, we recommend that additional
exploration and infiltration measurements be made.
Subsurface infiltration facilities should be constructed to meet the following separation
requirements.
o Separate from drinking water wells by at least 100 feet.
o Separate from foundations, septic systems, and other seepage beds by at least 10 feet.
o Do not place on slopes greater than 20 percent (SH:1 V).
o Do not place under buildings or other settlement sensitive structures.
o Do not place in loose or undocumented fill.
o Do not place in contaminated soil or groundwater areas.
o Separate from basements and similar structures by at least 30 feet, unless appropriate
seepage computations can show that seepage will not adversely affect the basement.
It is important that runoff be diverted away from the completed infiltration facilities during all
phases of construction, until the site is completely stabilized. Sediment loading during
construction can severely impact and compromise the performance of an infiltration facility.
American Geotechnlcs
Geotechnical Investigation
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)
Project No. 05B -G 1132.1
December 5, 2005
Page -16 -
5.0 CLOSURE
5.1 Limitations
A MERI CA;
TECHNICS
Recommendations contained in this report are based on our field explorations, laboratory tests,
and our understanding of the proposed construction. The study was performed using a mutually
agreed upon scope of work. It is our opinion that this study was a cost-effective method to
evaluate the subject site and evaluate some of the potential geotechnical concerns. More
detailed, focused, and/or thorough investigations can be conducted. Further studies will tend to
increase the level of assurance; however, such efforts will result in increased costs. If the Client
wishes to reduce the uncertainties beyond the level associated with this study, American
Geotechncas should be contacted for additional consultation.
The soils data used in the preparation of this report were obtained from the field explorations
made for this investigation. It is possible that variations in soils exist between the points
explored. The nature and extent of soil variations may not be evident until construction occurs.
If any soil conditions are encountered at this site that differ from those described in this report,
our firm should be immediately notified so that we may make any necessary revisions to our
recommendations. In addition, if the scope of the proposed project, locations of structures, or
building loads change from the description given in this report, our firm should be notified.
The recommendations made in this report are based on the assumption that an adequate program
of testing, observation, and engineering consultation will be made during construction to verify
compliance with the report findings and recommendations. This should include, but not
necessarily be limited to, observations and testing described within this report, and engineering
consultation as may be required during construction. These observation and testing items are
critical with regards to the conclusions and recommendations provided in this report. If these
--- items -are -not adequately -performed during construction, then the Client_agrees.to.assume .. _
American Geotechnccs' responsibility for any potential claims that may arise during or after
construction.
American Geotechnics
Geotechnical Investigation IA M E R I C A N
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres) I
Project No. 05B -G1132.1
Le i
December 5, 2005 T E( H N I( S
Page -17 -
The report has been prepared for specific application to this project in accordance with the
generally accepted standards of practice at the time the report was written. No warranty, express
or implied, is made.
This report may be used only by the Client and for the purposes stated, within a reasonable time
from its issuance. Land use, site conditions (both on- and off-site), or other factors including
advances in man's understanding of applied science may change overtime and could materially
affect our findings. Therefore, this report should not be relied upon after 24 months from its
issue. American Geotechnics should be notified if the project is delayed by more than 24 months
from the date of this report so that a review of site conditions can be made, and recommendations
revised, if appropriate.
It is the CLIENT'S responsibility to see that all parties to the project, including the designer,
contractor, subcontractors, etc., are made aware of this report in its entirety. The use of
information contained in this report for bidding purposes should be done at the Contractor's
option and risk. Any party other than the Client who wishes to use this report shall notify
American Geotechnics of such intended use by executing the "Application for Authorization to
Use" which follows this document as an appendix. Based on the intended use of the report,
American Geotechnics may require that additional work be performed and that an updated report
be issued. Non-compliance with any of these requirements by the Client or anyone else will
release American Geotechnics from any liability resulting from the use of this report by any
unauthorized party.
American Geotechnics
Geotechnical Investigation AM E RIC A;
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres) •
Project No. 05B -G1132.1 ` j J
TECH HI CS
APPENDIX A
VICINITY MAP
SITE PLAN
PHOTOS
American Geotechnics
Geotechnical Investigation A M E R I C A N
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres) , f
Project No. 05B -G1 132.1 A kk
TECHNICS
APPENDIX B
LOGS OF EXPLORATION
LABORATORY TEST REPORTS
American Geotechnics
Geotechnical Investigation A M E R I C A N
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)rI f•1
Project No. 05B -GI 132.1 L J : J
TECHNICS
APPENDIX C
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL,
ENGINEERING REPORT
APPLICATION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO USE
American Geotechnccs
Geotechnical hrvestigation
Leroy Brandt Family Parcel (10 acres)
Project No. 05B -G1132.1
APPLICATION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO USE AND COPY
TO: American Geotechnics, Inc.
5260 Chinden Blvd.
Boise, Idaho 84714
FROM:
Cyour company)
(your name and title)
(office address) _
(your telephone) (your fax)
RE:
(Report Title, Project Name, and Site Location)
American Geotechnics Report No. Report date
To American Geotechnics, Inc:
A M E R I ( A N
r 1 f 1
�C 1�J
TECHNICS
Applicant understands and agrees that the use of the referenced report withoutpermission from American
Geotechnics, Inc. releases American Geotechnics, hic. from any liability that may arise from use of this report. .
Applicant recognizes that American Geotechnics, Inc. is the copyright owner of this document. Applicant agrees that
unauthorized use or copying of the referenced report for the subject site is strictly prohibited without the express
written permission of American Geotechnics, Inc.
Applicant agrees to accept the contractual terms and conditions between American Geotechnics, Inc. and the client
listed in the referenced report as originally negotiated for the work.
(your signature)
(your title)
(date)
Statement from American Geotechnics, Inc.
1 copy approved for re -use after payment of a fee of $ to American Geotechnics, Inc.
Disapproved. This report needs to be updated by American Geotechnics, ]nc,
52
Date:
American Geotechnics
American. Geoteehnics,Inc _
Error! Reference source not found.
Meridian, Idaho
Project No. 05B -G1132.1
SYMBOL
, -I ;
rC
I EC0111ES
General Legend and Notes for Logs of Exploration
BG Small -volume bag sample
BK Large -volume bulk sample
SS Standard split -spoon sample (reference ASTM D 1586)
OSS Oversized split -spoon sample with an outside diameter of 3 inches. Blow
counts are not corrected to N -Values unless noted separately on the logs
ST Thin-walled (Shelby) tube sample with an inside diameter of 2.88 inches
unless otherwise noted on the logs (reference ASTM D 1587)
PT Piston tube sample with an inside tube diameter of 2.88 inches unless
otherwise noted on the logs (reference ASTM D 1587)
RS Ring sample with an inside diameter of 2.42 inches unless otherwise noted
on the logs (reference ASTM D 3550)
CR Core barrel sample (reference ASTM D 2113)
CD Water content
LL Liquid Limit
PL Plastic Limit
PI Plasticity Index
SZ Indicates the measured groundwater level
Note:
1. Soil- samples -recovered were identified, describedi and classified -in -the -field -using
ASTM D 2488 (Unified Soil Classification System) as a guide.
American Geotechnics
LL <50
ASTM D2487 Soils Classification Chart
GROUP
SYMBOL GROUP NAME
<30%plus No,200-,"� IS%plm Na2011 - Leen Clay
yy IS -M idlusNa 200 C= %aeM2Y. brevet —► Lean Clnywith Sand
PI> 7..d Plou on—► (�'ja %sand <%,mal I LeanMywllh Coeval
%tned2%ra"d15%gavdl Sandy Lan Clay
^•_r...,°• e.e 230%plua No200 klSid all - Sandy Lan Cloy Al Gavdl
%sand<%bevel<15%11neval�0avdly Lwn Clay
a l5v.graval ' Gnvdlyl.ea Clayw,thSend
<30%pIwNa 20l <15%plus Na 200 Silly Clay
15-29%plus NaM ►%need t%Seel—►silly chy %ids Send
---s.-CL-ML %and<%mvd� Silty Clay with Cenvel
<V, dk%v.l�<15#Agmv6 ' Smdy SillyClay
23014plurNo200� 215%gravel—=goody 8ilsy Clay wi0sthevel
%sand<%penal <15%geal� Gravelly Silty Clay
215%gavel= (3ravely S,iry Clay with Send
<37%Plus Na 20D�<75%plus Na 200 Silt
15-2Y/e plus No. 200 ��= %send 2%tend —► oiltwA Send
recd..... - ML %sand-yigowd---�Shcxnth GYevel
below"A"line ,I%tard2%reel -Zz-zzU5%navel ' Sandy Sill
2303Apiu3No200! 215%grevel� Sandy Sillwith Q.M
\%sand,%,w.I-�<15%towelISra"lly Silt
213%gnaval - Onvelly Siltwiih Sand
I2.-uvadded
0rppdo <U.25 _-� OL Sabelaw
LL-ootdded
<30%SAW No. 2M <IS%piw Na200 Pet Cley
15-29%plua No.200 C► %amd 2%gravel —► Pet Clay with Sand
N'loaon or - Ori{ %aand<%revel— Pet ClaywlthGood
.bond"A'line %a and t vow gavel �< 15% bowel Sandy Pd Clay
230voplw No200 215%gravel � Sandy Pat Gay with(havel
% land <v.®rvelZ-:�<l5%Sed (hnvellypat Clay
Inoaalc 215%Snvei Govally pat Clay with Send
<Mo plus No. 200 <15%plan Na 20D - Elauc Slll
15.29% plus No. 200 `► %send 2%ted --� Elastic Slltwilh3and
N plot. below � ]K[� %sand <%Meal —► Elod. Sill with Gravel
LL>50 'A•lae %sand 2%grvol<"V."'el ' Sand'Elasbo silt
23D°/.plus Na200 �e 215%peril - Sandy 311.0. Siltwith Gee,
/wend<% rev.1 <15%nnaval Gravelly Elea,. Silt
215%ravel a- Govelly ElvdcSiltwihSdnd
0aado Ll.-oveadded
<0.25 �OH Seabelnw
LL-notdrind
50% PIM No, 200 15% plot Na 200 Orgerdo Clay
15-29% pl. No. 200 C► %seeds%ravel —i Orgndc Clay wilhSand
% tend <%ravel I Orgenio Gey with Wil
PI 24 and p,oh on <%land 2 Yo Snw,l<15%Steve! Sandy Orgnio Clay
oub.WR line 230 No 200 215%ganal—► Sandy Orgerde Clay with Gavel
vaned<%nowel�<75%navel ' Gavallyo".n.LS.y
215%revolt Onveliy0rgenio Clay with Send
OL %plus <30% plueNu. 200 -Zzz�z<15%plus N4200 - Osgenie Silt
15.29% plus No, 200 ZZ%ssndt% gavel—► Organia Silt with Sand
96send<%,navel—► Orba.lo Slltwit heat
Pl<4 or plata %oenda%govd�<15%gavel Sandy Oral. Silt
bolow •A'lina 230%ph.N.200 215%gowd Sandy Organio Silt with Gavel
%send<%gnvai�<75%tend Grandly Orgenie391t
215%gavel�(3rv4,y Organic Silt with Sand
<30%piw No.20D�<15%piw Na200 - ON.&Clay
15-29%plwNo.M ►%.ands% rand —► 019W. Clay wgh Send
%nnd<%navel —► 0'ad. Clay, with Gravel
M4 endplou on //-%and2%Sed^.<15%bavel�— --Sandy '"Iechy
..above"A°line 230%piw No 20DSandy Orgnlo Clay withGavel
y%tand<%gavel <15%Seel--.- Onvelly O'l to Ciay
215%Snvei—^ Gravelly0rgadeC,aywith Sdnd
OH <30%plus Nn.200 <15%plus No.200 Organia Silt
15.29vep1usN..200 Organic Siltwita Send
%and<%,owed- OrgadaSiltwithGnaveI
Ploa belowvaand2vepevel <15%gravel '- gmdy Ogenio Silt
'A°lino 230%piw No200� �215aebgravel ' Sady Orgnia Silt with(hevel
yy%nod<%rend <IS%gravel - Gravelly Organs. Silt
215%gavel Gavelly0rgmic Silt with Send
10
0
0
ASTM D2487 Soils Classification Chart (cont.)
GROUP
nJaV�
ok
SYMBOL
GROUP NAME
<5%M.C.24 end loC.3-
' GW <15%send -
Well Cmdd Gavel
215%send '
Well Gradd Gravel with Send
Cu<4and/orl>Cr,3
- GP <15%send '
Poody Ondd (Navel
215%smd '
Poody Codd GmvelwithSend
frau=3 orhldl
- GW-GMz:,Z:<15%smd -
Well CWdGrevelwithSilt
GRAVEL
Cu24andi4es3�
fin. -CL er CH
215%lend —
GW -(>`C <1554send�
Well Greded Gravel with Sill and Send
Well Gredd Gravel with Cl -y
%ge,W�
5.12%fn.
<fn
215%won '
Wan Graded Gravel with Clay end Send
%send
/
MLoMr[
GP-GM<IS%emd=Poody
Codd Gravel with Silt
Cu<4md/orbCo
215%send
Poorly fireded Gravel with Silland Send
finm-CLor CH
-GP-GIC -zzz:::Z<15%seed
Poorly Graded Gravel with Clay
215%emd '
Poorly Grded (towel with CJymd Send
--- C MI
time=MLorMFI
-
GM--z=:zz::::Z<15%emd -
Silly Grevel
215%smd
Silly Orwel with Send
>12%6. Gram-CLor Cff�G(,`
<IS%smd
Clayey Gravel
215%send -
Cieyey Grovel wiMond
flnm-Cbb
- GC -GM 115% lend -
Silty. Clem Grovel
215%mod -
Silly, Clayey Gravel Wilk Send
<5%rtnm Cu26md1sCoa
- SW <15%&revel--+—
Well Graded Send
215%Served
Well Graded Senddlk Grrvel
Cu<6anft, IX.3
- SP �<13%&revel—�Yowly
Cmdd Smd
215%gravel
Poody Graded Smdwith Gravel
rtnes-MLnrhG[—+•SW-SM
Z<I5%,awes -
Well Graded smd with gilt
Cu26endloCp
215%gravel '
Well GradedSmdwlthSiltand Grevei
SAND
fmm-CLmCH
-SW-SC --zzz.�<l5%grevel -
Well dd Send with Clay
%sandy
5-12% fie.
215%&revel `
Well Cradd Smdwith Mooed Gravel
%erevol
flnm=3R.ortAi-
- SP-SM<15%gnvol—►Poorly
Gadd Smd xilh 3Jt
Cu <6 md/or 1>Ca3�
215%&revel '
Poorly Csnded Sandwlth Sillmd Gravel
fine=CLor CH�j`P-S(,`
-zzz:::Z<IS%gnvoi
Paody Graded Send vrilh Clny
. 215%graved
Pmdy(iradd Smd Wilk Clay and (Naval
fin.-IMooldH
SM<15%gravel '
Silly Send
215%&nvei—
Silty eendwith Gravel
>72%Goes flp.-Cl..or
15%gravel '
Clayey Smd
2159lgravel
Clayey SandwithGravel
-Cw&
- sc-sM `'�' <l3%®evel—�
Silry, Clayey Serd
215%grerel '
Silty, Ciayeygend withGravel
10
0
0
10 16 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
LIQUID LIMIT (LL)
nJaV�
ok
�p4
/
/
/
/
/
A 1
,'
04
MH or,
OH
/
ML oR OL
--- C MI
I
10 16 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
LIQUID LIMIT (LL)
More construction problems are caused by site
subsurface conditions than any other factor. As
troublesome as subsurface problems can be, their
frequency and extent have been lessened
considerably in recent years, due in large measure to
programs and publications of ASFE/The
Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in the
Geosciences.
The following suggestions and observations are
offered to help you reduce the geotechnical -related
delays, cost -overruns and other costly headaches
that can occur during a construction project.
A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT
IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET OF PROJECT -
SPECIFIC FACTORS
A geotechnical engineering report is based on a
subsurface exploration plan designed to incorporate
a unique set of project -specific factors. These
typically include: the general nature of the structure
involved, its size and configuration; the location of
the structure on the site and its orientation; physical
concomitants such as access roads, parking lots, and
underground utilities, and the level of additional risk
which the client assumed by virtue of limitations
imposed upon the exploratory program. To help
avoid costly problems, consult the geotechnical
engineer to determine how any factors which change
subsequent to the date of the report may affect its
recommendations.
Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer
indicates otherwise, your geotechnical engineering
report should not be used:
• When the nature of the proposed structure is
changed, for example, if an office building will
be erected instead of a parking garage, or if a
refrigerated warehouse will be built instead of
an unrefrigerated one;
• When the size or configuration of the proposed
structure is altered;
• When the location or orientation of the proposed
structure is modified;
When there is a change of ownership, or
For application to an adjacent site.
Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility
for problems which may develop if they are not
consulted after factors considered in their report's
development have changed.
MOST GEOTECHNICAL "FINDINGS" ARE
PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES
Site exploration identifies actual subsurface
conditions only at those points where samples are
taken, when they are taken. Data derived through
sampling and subsequent laboratory testing are
extrapolated by geotechnical engineers who then
render an opinion about overall subsurface
conditions, their likely reaction to proposed
construction activity, and appropriate foundation
design. Even under optimal circumstances actual
conditions may differ from those inferred to exist,
because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how
qualified, and no subsurface exploration program,
no matter how comprehensive, can reveal what is
hidden by earth, rock and time. The actual interface
between materials may be far more gradual or
abrupt than a report indicates. Actual conditions in
areas not sampled may differ from predictions.
Nothing can be done too prevent the unanticipated,
but steps can be taken to help minimize their impact.
For this reason, most experienced owners retain
their geotechnical consultants through the
construction stage, to identify variances, conduct
additional tests which may be needed, and to
recommend solutions to problems encountered on
site.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS CAN CHANGE
Subsurface conditions may be modified by
constantly -changing natural forces. Because a
geotechnical engineering report is based on
conditions which existed at the time of subsurface
exploration, construction decisions should not be
based on a geotechnical engineering report whose
adequacy may have been affected by time. Speak
with the geotechnical consultant to learn if
additional tests are advisable before construction
starts.
Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and
natural events such as floods, earthquakes or
groundwater fluctuations may also affect subsurface
conditions and, thus, the continuing adequacy of a
geotechnical report. The geotechnical engineer
should be kept apprised of any such events, and
should be consulted to determine if additional tests
are necessary.
GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE
PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES
AND PERSONS
Geotechnical engineers' reports are prepared to
meet the specific needs of specific individuals. A
report prepared for a consulting civil engineer may
not be adequate for a construction contractor, or
even some. other consulting civil engineer. Unless
indicated otherwise, . this report was prepared
expressly for the client involved and expressly for
purposes indicated by the client. Use by any other
persons for any purpose, or by the client for a
different purpose, may result in problems. No
individual other than the client should apply this
report for its intended purpose without first
conferring with the geotechnical engineers. No
person should apply this report for any purpose
other than that originally contemplated without first
conferring with the geotechnical engineer,
A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING.REPORT
IS SUBJECT TO MISINTERPRETATION
Costly problems can occur when other design
professionals develop their plans based on
misinterpretations of a geotechnical engineering
report. To help avoid these problems, the
geotechnical engineer should be retained to work
with other appropriate design professionals to
explain relevant geotechnical findings and to review
the adequacy of their plans and specifications
relative to geotechnical issues.
BORING LOGS SHOULD NOT BE
SEPARATED FROM THE ENGINEERING
REPORT
Final boring logs are developed by geotechnical
engineers based upon their interpretation of field
logs (assembled by site personnel) and laboratory
evaluation of field samples. Only final boring logs
customarily are included in geotechnical
engineering reports. These logs should not under
any circumstances be redrawn for inclusion in
architectural or other design drawings, because
drafters may commit error or omissions in the
transfer process. Although photographic
reproduction eliminates this problem, it does
nothing to minimize the possibility of contractors
misinterpreting the logs during bid preparation.
When this occurs, delays, disputes and unanticipated
costs are the all -too -frequent result.
To minimize the likelihood of boring log
misinterpretation, give contractors ready access to
the complete geotechnical engineering report
prepared or authorized for their use. Those who do
not provide such access may proceed under the
mistaken impression that simply disclaiming
responsibility for the accuracy of subsurface
information always insulates them from attendant
liability. Providing the best available information to
contractors helps prevent costly construction
problems and the adversarial attitudes which
aggravate them to disproportionate scale.
READ RESPONSIBILITY CLAUSES
CLOSELY
Because geotechnical engineering . is based
extensively on judgment and opinion, it is far less
exact than other design disciplines. This situation
has resulted in wholly unwarranted claims being
lodged against geotechnical consultants. To help
prevent this problem, geotechnical engineers have
developed model clauses for use in written
transmittals. These are not exculpatory clauses
designed to foist geotechnical engineers' liabilities
onto someone else. Rather, they are definitive
clauses which identify where geotechnical
engineers' responsibilities begin and end. Their use
helps all parties involved recognize their individual
responsibilities and take appropriate action. Some
of these definitive clauses are likely to appear in
your geotechnical engineering report, and you are
encouraged to read them closely. Your geotechnical
engineer will be pleased to give fall and frank
answers to your questions.
OTHER STEPS YOU CAN TAKE TO REDUCE
RISK
Your consulting geotechnical engineer will be
pleased to discuss other techniques which can be
employed to mitigate risk. In addition, ASFE has
developed a variety of materials which may be
beneficial. Contact ASFE for a complimentary copy
of its publications directory.
Published by
ASFE
(The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in the Geosciences)
8511 Colesville Road/Suite G106/Silver Spring, Maryland 20910
301/565-2733
FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT DESIGN - ITD GRAVEL EQUIVALENCY METHOD
Project Name: Brandt Subdivision (54.3 acres) Meridian
Project No: 05B -G1132
Date: 10 -Nov -05
Section: Light resldentiat collector
Name of surface course layer (Layer 1):
Layer2:
Layer 3:
La er Nam
Plant Mix
Base
Granular Subbase
Subgrade
Desian R -Values
Base
Granular Subbase ir.
Subgrade s'k�,'i%4=d+�1,rrA� ".s:'N'sf.✓��ai<
Estimated Traffic Index (T.I.):
Regional Climate Factor. Ct:% „.j' (Reference Figure 10-510.5.1
ITD Materials Manual)
Material Substitution Ratios
Plant Mix
'jk
Base _� 11. P1
Granular Subbase , �;r �;_r a R11.1
A M E R I C A P
IECItAIC!
Minimum Required Gravel Equivalence (GE) = 10.40 Inches (GE Method In Section 500
ITD Materials Manual)
Plant MI
Required Thickness:��,`8' Inches
Recommended Thickness: Inches
Base
Required Thickness: OR inches
Recommended Thlckness: inches
Granular Subbase
Required Thickness, (j)j€,,,W`,r�,`x Inches
Recommended Thickness: NXR?L@=j Inches
RECOMMMENDED PAVEMENT SECTION
Plant Mix
3.5
inches
Base
4.0
Inches
Granular Subbase
7.0
Inches
GE Required
16.40
Inches
GE Recommended
16.95
Inches
American Geotechnics
CITY. OF MERIDIAN
PRE -APPLICATION MEETING NOTES
Project/Subdivision Name:
City Staff: Y; W , ,jus¢r
Location "1,Jc-r).('
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Designation: MU -C Size
Design Guidelines Development Context: // &aj 6a w6 wr tea +
Proposed Use: Gaw efc ; g Proposed Zoning:
Existing Use: Existing Zoning: G - G
Surrounding Uses: alb ev u�
Street Buffer(s) and/or Land Use Buffer(s): 3 s
Open Space/Amenities/Pathways: Z11f 159C7Y,0 l h
Access/Stub Streets/Street System: CcD r,c 7`7,
Sewer & Water Service: r
Topography/Hydrology/Floodplain Issues:
History:
CZP"r�
Date:
Property:
Other Agencies/Departments to Contact:
❑ Ada County Highway District
❑ Idaho Transportation Department
❑
❑
Nampa Meridian Irrigation District.
Settler's Irrigation District
❑
Public Works Department
❑ Sanitary Services Company
❑ Central District Health Department
❑
❑
Police Department
'Fire Department
❑
❑
Building Department
Parks Department
❑
Other:
Application(s) Required:
❑
❑
Administrative Design Review
Alternative Compliance
❑
Conditional Use Permit Modification/Transfer
❑
Rezone
❑
Annexation
M
❑
Development A reement Modification 52.60 ❑
Final Plat
Short Plat
❑
❑
City Council Review
Comprehensive Plan Amendment- Map
❑Final
❑
Plat Modification
Planned
El
❑
Time Extension - Council
UDC Text Amendment
El/
Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Text
®
Unit Development
Preliminary Plat f 2lay,io d #tVvlee la
❑
❑
Vacation
Variance
❑ Conditional Use Permit
❑
Private Street di 1 d0,bo r V /. a)/ �p la t
❑
Other
Notes: 1) Applicants are required to hold a neighborhood meeting in accord with UDC 11 -5A -5C prior to submittal of an application
requiring a public hearing (except for a vacation or short plat); and 2) All applicants for permits requiring a public hearing shall post the
site with a public hearing notice in accord with UDC 11 -5A -5D.3 (except for UDC text amendments, Comp Plan text amendments, and
vacations). The information provided during this meeting is based on current UDC requirements and the Comprehensive Plan. Any
subsequent changes to the UDC and/or Comp Plan may affect your submittal and/or application. This pre -application meeting shall be
valid for four (4) months.
COMMITMENT OF PROPERTY POSTING
Per Unified Development Code (UDC) 11 -5A -5D, the applicant for all applications requiring a
public hearing (except for a UDC text amendment, a Comprehensive Plan text amendment
and/or vacations) shall post the subject property not less than ten (10) days prior to the hearing.
The applicant shall post a copy of the public hearing notice of the application(s) on the property
under consideration.
The applicant shall submit proof of property posting in the form of a notarized statement and a
photograph of the posting to the City no later than seven (7) days prior to the public hearing
attesting to where and when the sign(s) were posted. Unless such Certificate is received by the
required date, the hearing will be continued.
The sign(s) shall be removed no later than three (3) days after the end of the public hearing for
which the sign(s) had been posted,
I am aware of the above requirements and will comply with the posting requirements as stated in
UDC 11-5A-5.
(�- 3- r�
Applicant/agent signature Date
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102 • Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888.6854 • Website: www.meridianciLy.org
C�E IDIANt.,
Community Development
Parcel Verification
Date: 5/7/14
Meridian City Hall, Suite 102
33 E. Broadway Avenue
Meridian, Idaho 83642
208.887.2211
The parcel information below has been researched and verified as correct by the City of Meridian
Community Development Department.
Project Name: Linder & Chinden
Parcel Number: R1065270177
T/R/S: 4N 1W 23
Acres: 9.339
Property Owner: FAE Holding 45007OR LLC
2700 Airport Way
Boise, ID 83705
Address Verification
Rev:04/23/12
Laren Bailey
From: Jerry Hastings ohastings@adaweb.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 11:24 AM
To: Laren Bailey; Ken Cook; Russell Badgley (rbadgley@timberlinesurvey.com)
Subject: Chinden and Linder Crossing Subdivision Name Reservation
June 5, 2014
Laren Bailey
LEI Engineers, Surveyors and Planners
RE: Subdivision Name Reservation: "Chinden and Linder Crossing Subdivision"
Dear Laren,
At your request I have the reserved the name "Chinden and Linder Crossing Subdivision" for your project. I can honor
this reservation only as long as your project is In the approval process. Final approval can only take place when the final
plat is recorded.
This reservation is available for the next ten (10) years unless the project is terminated by the client or the jurisdiction or
the conditions of approval have not been met. In which case the name can be re -used by someone else.
Sincerely,
Jerry L. Hastings, PLS 5359
County Surveyor
Ex Officio Recorder
Ada County Development Services
200 W. Front St., Boise, ID 83702
(208) 287-7912 office
(208)287-7909 fox
rrom: Laren Bailey Lmailto•lbaileyCablei-en com]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 10:59 AM
To: Jerry Hastings
Subject: Re: Name Reservation
Ken Cook or Russell Badgley
Sent from my Whone
On Jun 5, 2014, at 9:10 AM, "Jerry Hastings" <> wrote:
Hi Laren, hope you are doing well. The name will work. Do you know who will be stamping the plat?
Thanks, Jerry.
Jerry L. Hastings, PLS 5359
County Surveyor
Ex Officio Recorder
<image001.png> Ada County Development Services
200 W. Front St., BOISe; ID 83702
(208) 287-7912 office
(208)287-7909 fax
Laren Ba
From: Christy Little [Clittle@achdidaho.org]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 9:36 AM
To: Matthew Witt
Cc: Chris Penland; Brian Watt; Chood@meridiancity.org
Subject: RE: Proposed Linder Access at the NW Corner of Chinden and Linder
Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
We have taken a look at this and think it will work, at least in the near term. We will likely need to work with you on a
development agreement that spells out conditions for when the left turning movements may have to be prohibited
(safety related).
Thanks,
Christy
From: Matthew Witt [ma!Ito:mawColrmcos com]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 10:58 AM
To: Christy Little
Cc: Chris Penland; Brian Watt; Matthew Witt
Subject: Proposed Linder Access at the NW Corner of Chinden and Linder
Hi Christy,
At our meeting at the City of Meridian on November 19`h, we briefly discussed some general concepts for access at our
recently -acquired Chinden and Linder (NW corner) site —I wanted to follow-up with you regarding a more specific
question on the proposed Linder access...
The prior development agreement for the property referred to a right-in/right-out/left-in access at the north end of the
property on Linder, and we'd like to confirm the feasibility of having that traffic flow. Currently there is a median on
Linder for the south -bound left turn lanes onto east -bound Chinden, and it appears this median could be effectively
modified to allow the left -in movement with no disruption to traffic flow for both the intersection and Ingress/egress for
the Fred Meyer development to the east (please see attached site and median sketchs). Can you give us your thoughts
on this proposed access and if ACHD would be supportive of this configuration? We want to make sure we design and
market our subdivision accordingly.
Please let me know if you have any questions, or would like to meet again to further discuss. I greatly appreciate your
assistance!
Thanks and Happy New Year,
Matt
Matthew IA/btt AIA, NCARB
Director of Design & Construction
Rocky Mountain Management & Development, LLC
208.345,7030 ext. 218
208.345.7210 fax
208.941.6131 cell
mWitt(@rmmdllc.com
Information from ESET Endpoint Security, version of virus signature database 9917 (20140609)
fill
`|�
|
` g�
§ !§§§
|[ |
■
�! |
• ,,�� :
e
CHI_e&m_CROSSING SUBDIVISION
MERIDIAN,
\}}}}ƒ ___RYA T j \�
i
R
L"0
u
NI 1
': lnwwixit.�mrcN5ei5)
j � 1EZ71
�1, IGZ�I
I,A11111L1`aJ C�
N. UNDER ROAD
s
p
F
I
0
,v
1 :�i4V
W1 `11 II�7>s
f,E •J •.!
�41I444I}P9Y94140 rel Y�IWg
W'epS93 i2e "W
B¢'fi gg���9RF4�a�G��Ba��H�S
g�lll�i3prt �'rRs �§a'g3���3��g�
N.#%sE a� q� p ��•a�
Ms ® g 9 pp s
FFF�F�RFE�iFFf�=SYP �Y¢
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
4..FP 4YF YT54 ➢Y
G PM p G G G
C pCHINDEN & LINDER CROSSING SUBDIVISION
j 1�al6F vlla ElLl I. I. I. �IE MFRNIRN,IDAND i •'ss•.MS IA IO Imf®
LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN „ .¢ u, �+ �,
r
3
CL
ml
n
ol
0
N
y
GQ
811(�
Hearing Date: July 17, 2014
Project Name: Chinden and Linder Crossing Subdivision
File No(s).: PP -14-011 and MDA -14-008
Request(s): (PP) - Preliminary Plat consisting of nine (9) commercial lots and two (2)
common lots on approximately 9.34 acres in the C -C zoning district, by LEI
Engineers
(MDA): Request to terminate the three (3) development agreements governing the
site AND enter into a new DA for the purpose of attaching a new concept plan
and new provisions relevant to the proposed Chinden and Linder Crossing
Subdivision.
Location: The site is located on the northwest corner of Chinden Boulevard and N. Linder
Road in the SE'/a of Section 23, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, B.M.