Loading...
2014-06-24�E IDIAN-- CITY COUNCIL REGULAR IDAHO MEETING AGENDA AMENDED AGENDA City Council Chambers 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, June 24, 2014 at 6:00 PM Roll -Call Attendance X David Zaremba O Joe Borton X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird X_ Genesis Milam X Luke Cavener O Mayor Tammy de Weerd 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Community Invocation by Pastor Slyter 4. Adoption of the Agenda Adopted 5. Consent Agenda Approved A. FP 14-025 Oaks South by Coleman Homes, LLC Located South Side of W. McMillan Road Between N. McDermott Road and N. Black Cat Road Request: Final Plat Approval Consisting of Forty -Two (42) Single Family Residential Lots and Nine (9) Common Lots on 16.83 Acres of Land in the R-8 Zoning District B. FP 14-024 Bienville Square No. 3 by Centre Point, LLC Located West of N. Eagle Road and South of E. Ustick Road Request: Final Plat Approval Consisting of Forty (40) Single Family Residential Lots and Four (4) Common/Other Lots on 5.27 Acres of Land in the R-15 Zoning District C. FP 14-026 Southern Highlands by BHH Investments 1, LLC Located South of E. Amity Road and North of E. Taconic Drive and West of S. Eagle Road Request: Final Plat Consisting of Forty -Seven (47) Building Lots and Six (6) Common Lots on 27.66 Acres of Land in an R-4 Zoning District D. Rail -With -Trail Arterial Crossing Design Study Contract Between Project Engineering Consultants, the Idaho Transportation Department and the City of Meridian for a Not -to -Exceed Amount of $81,523.00 E. Well Lot Lease with Mission Coast Properties as Lessor for a Well Lot Site at Reflection Ridge No. 3 Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda — Tuesday, June 24, 2014 Page 1 of 2 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. F. Resolution No. 14-996A: A Resolution Approving The Transfer Of The Assets And Liabilities Of The Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District, Ada County, Idaho, To The City Of Meridian, Idaho, Pursuant To The "Agreement For The Dissolution And Transfer Of Assets And Liabilities From Meridian Heights Water And Sewer District To The City Of Meridian; Settlement Agreement And Release 6. Items Moved From Consent Agenda None 7. Action Items A. Public Hearing: AP 14-001 Southridge Gravel Mining by Idaho Sand and Gravel Located South of W. Overland Road and East of S. Ten Mile Road Request: City Council Review of the Conditional Use Permit Modification (MCU 14-001) Application Denied 8. Department Reports A. Mayor's Office: City Survey Acceptance B. Mayor's Office: Resolution No. 14-997: Adopting 2014 Meridian Citizens Survey Results Approved C. Fire Department: Budget Amendment for Public Education Prevention for the Not -to -Exceed Amount of $17,602.00 Approved D. Arts Commission: Budget Amendment for Spending Authority for Concerts on Broadway for the Not -to -Exceed Amount of $15,000.00 Approved E. Mayor's Office: Mayor's Youth Advisory Council Budget Amendment Request and Spending Authority for Ball at the Hall for the Not -to -Exceed Amount of $2,275.00 Approved F. Mayor's Office: Budget Amendment for Special Projects for a Not -to - Exceed Amount of $60,000.00 Approved G. Legal Department: Recipient Agreement Between City of Meridian and Meridian Boys & Girls Club for Contribution of Fiscal Year 2014 Funds not to exceed $500,000.00 Approved H. Legal Department: Budget Amendment for a Donation to the Boys and Girls Club for a Not -to -Exceed Amount of $500,000 Approved 9. Future Meeting Topics None ----- Adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda —Tuesday, June 24, 2014 Page 2 of 2 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City ClerKs Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 A meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:00 p.m., Tuesday, June 24, 2014, by President Charlie Rountree. Members Present: Charlie Rountree , Keith Bird, Genesis Milam, David Zaremba and Luke Cavener. Members Absent: Mayor Tammy de Weerd and Joe Borton. Others Present: Bill Nary, Jaycee Holman, Bruce Chatterton, Sonya Watters, Warren Stewart, Jeff Lavey, Mark Niemeyer, Robert Simison, Steve Siddoway, Dean Willis. Item 1: Roll -call Attendance: Roll call. X David Zaremba Joe Borton X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird X Genesis Milam X Luke Cavener Mayor Tammy de Weerd Rountree: I will call the June 24th Meridian City Council meeting to order. Roll call attendance. Madam Clerk. Item 2: Pledge of Allegiance Rountree: Next item on the agenda is the Pledge of Allegiance. If you would all rise and join us in the pledge. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) Item 3: Community Invocation by Pastor Slyter Rountree: And this evening we will be led in the community invocation by Pastor Slyter. Welcome. Slyter: Let's bow our heads and open in prayer. Our Heavenly Father, we thank you for this day. We thank you again, Lord, for the many blessings that we enjoy here in Meridian. We recognize that every good and perfect gift comes from you and so we give you honor and thanks, Lord, for the peace, the prosperity, the civility, the just overall good morale that we enjoy here in Meridian. We pray, Lord, your blessing upon this meeting, every point of business that is brought up. We pray, Lord, that even though there may be different opinions that there would be the unity of wanting what is best for our community and seeking your wisdom and guidance and we thank you for that. Be with our Mayor while she is away. Bless each person who participates tonight Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 2 of 42 and every point of business that is brought up. Thank you we pray through Christ, our Lord, amen. Item 4: Adoption of the Agenda Rountree: Thank you, pastor. Next item is the adoption of the agenda. Bird: Mr. President? Rountree: Mr. Bird. Bird: I would move -- we have got one change or one addition. On Department Reports, 8-B, the resolution number is 14-997. And with that I would move we adopt the agenda as published. Milam: Second. Zaremba: Second. Rountree: It's been moved and seconded to adopt the agenda. All those in favor signify by aye. Any opposed? MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 5: Consent Agenda A. FP 14-025 Oaks South by Coleman Homes, LLC Located South Side of W. McMillan Road Between N. McDermott Road and N. Black Cat Road Request: Final Plat Approval Consisting of Forty -Two (42) Single Family Residential Lots and Nine (9) Common Lots on 16.83 Acres of Land in the R-8 Zoning District B. FP 14-024 Bienville Square No. 3 by Centre Point, LLC Located West of N. Eagle Road and South of E. Ustick Road Request: Final Plat Approval Consisting of Forty (40) Single Family Residential Lots and Four (4) Common/Other Lots on 5.27 Acres of Land in the R-15 Zoning District C. FP 14-026 Southern Highlands by BHH Investments 1, LLC Located South of E. Amity Road and North of E. Taconic Drive and West of S. Eagle Road Request: Final Plat Consisting of Forty -Seven (47) Building Lots and Six (6) Common Lots on 27.66 Acres of Land in an R-4 Zoning District Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 3 of 42 D. Rail -With -Trail Arterial Crossing Design Study Contract Between Project Engineering Consultants, the Idaho Transportation Department and the City of Meridian for a Not - to -Exceed Amount of $81,523.00 E. Well Lot Lease with Mission Coast Properties as Lessor for a Well Lot Site at Reflection Ridge No. 3 F. Resolution No. 14-996A: A Resolution Approving The Transfer Of The Assets And Liabilities Of The Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District, Ada County, Idaho, To The City Of Meridian, Idaho, Pursuant To The "Agreement For The Dissolution And Transfer Of Assets And Liabilities From Meridian Heights Water And Sewer District To The City Of Meridian; Settlement Agreement And Release Rountree: Next Item is the Consent Agenda. Bird: Mr. President? Rountree: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we approve the Consent Agenda as published and the President to sign and the Clerk to attest. Milam: Second. Zaremba: Second. Rountree: It's been moved and seconded and seconded to approve the Consent Agenda. Roll call vote. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, absent; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 6: Items Moved From Consent Agenda Rountree: No items were removed. Item 7: Action Items A. Public Hearing: AP 14-001 Southridge Gravel Mining by Idaho Sand and Gravel Located South of W. Overland Road and East Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 4 of 42 of S. Ten Mile Road Request: City Council Review of the Conditional Use Permit Modification (MCU 14-001) Application Rountree: And our Action Item this evening is a public hearing for AP 14-001, Southridge Gravel Mining by Idaho Sand and Gravel. Staff? Watters: Thank you, Chairman Rountree, Members of the Council. The application before you tonight is a request for City Council review of the Commission's decision on MCU 14-001. This site consists of 76 acres of land. It's currently zoned R-2, R-4 and R-8 and it's located south of West Overland Road and east of South Ten Mile Road west of the Ridenbaugh Canal. To touch on the history of this project, this property was annexed into the city in 2006 and included in the preliminary plat for Southridge Subdivision. A conditional use permit was approved on February 3rd of 2011 for construction of sand and gravel mining and crushing of material on the site for a purpose of mass grading of the property for the development of a residential subdivision. The applicant requested three years in which to complete the grading, crushing, and removal of material necessary to prepare the site for a residential development and reclaim the site. Because of the proximity of residential properties in relation to the project site and potential impacts from the proposed impacts from the proposed use, the Commission approved a lesser period of 18 months with the understanding that a modification to the conditional use permit could be requested to extend the time if needed. The permit expired on August 3rd of 2012. In July of 2012 a request for a modification to the conditional use permit was submitted for an 18 month extension of the use. Because no one testified at the hearing or submitted written testimony in opposition, the Commission approved the request to allow the operation to continue for an additional 18 months until April 4th of 2014. This year. At such time the site was required to be graded per the reclamation plan or modification to the conditional use permit could again be requested to extend the use. Prior to the expiration date of the conditional use permit the applicants did request a final 18 month extension to remove the processed material from the site and reclaim the site, 60 days of which to mine and crush additional material. The Commission approved the conditional use permit with conditions that allowed an additional maximum period of six months until November 1st of 2014 in which to complete reclamation of the site, including grading of the site and hauling off existing stockpiles and removal of all equipment. And just a side note, the preliminary plat that did exist on this property has now expired, so there is no valid development plan for this site. And, then, also just a little bit of additional information. There has been a lot of discussion on this project between what is reclamation and what is considered grading for the site. Reclamation is something that the state -- the Bureau of Reclamation requires and it is merely for slope stabilization purposes. They require it to be at a certain slope and they require it to be vegetated to stabilize the slope. Grading is entirely, you know, different. It's more for the development of a subdivision. The City of Meridian does not have a grading permit. Typically that is -- that is not under our jurisdiction. The reason it is with this application is because initially when this came in the applicant proposed to have the site reclaimed and graded in accord with the grading plan that was associated with the preliminary plat at that time. All of that work done within a three year period. Since that Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 5 of 42 time staff has associated grading of the site with this use, because it is a direct result of this use, that the site needs the amount of grading that it does. It's not typical with just a -- between a normal piece of property and a site that's been mined, as you can imagine. Anyway, just wanted to explain that a little bit. The applicant is requesting Council review of the Commission's decision on the most recently approved conditional use permit MCU 14-001 with modifications as stated in their letter and you should have a copy of that. Written testimony has been received from Glen Hickey, Dick and Susan Bagley, Ryan Brewer, Jerry Ross, Joe and Patsy Kendall, Maureen Brewer, Lynn Ryber, Bob Marslin, Nadeen Marslin, Keith and Diane Ebeling, Williams and Phillip Weiss, Robert and Susan Carlson, Tony Martarano, and there is a memo from staff in the record as well. Staff will stand for any questions the Council may have. Rountree: Questions from staff? Bird: I have none at this time. Rountree: Thank you. Is the applicant here? Nary: Mr. President? Mr. President, before you start for the Council and the public, too, when there is an appeal of a CUP from the Planning and Zoning Commission it is a new hearing entirely. So, that the public understands the Council is free to uphold the Planning and Zoning's requirements, create new conditions if you wish, change conditions completely if you want to, but it's a completely new hearing. So, at this point, mostly for the public or the folks that are watching, to understand that this is a do over, it's not a -- just a continuation of the Planning and Zoning hearing. Rountree: Thank you, Bill, for the clarification. Todd. Lakey: Thank you, Sonya. Mr. President and Members of the Council, my name is Todd Lakey for the record. Address is 141 East Carlton, Meridian, Idaho. Council Members, the staff I think adequately reviewed the history of this particular project. As you know, it's part of the 290 acre project. This is about 80 acres worth of that. It was annexed, it was zoned, there is a development agreement in place that specifies the uses for the subject property. Those are a mix of commercial, residential, low, medium and high residential, relocation of Overland Road, a school, a park, a good mix of things. The minimum number of residences is specified at 1,000, with a maximum just over 1,200 in the development agreement. Sonya, have I got a controller over there? Watters: I will flip them for you. Lakey: Council Members, this is just an overlay of the project. Looking here you have got your R-8, your R-4, and your R-2. But the entire project encompasses a larger area. The subject property, this parcel here. Next slide, Sonya. In the Planning and Zoning hearings the concern was we are putting a fair number of mixed uses next to some rural county, non -city residents and subdivisions. There was discussion about that transition. Part of what they were looking at was a limitation on residential heights and densities. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 6 of 42 So, they put the lower densities next to that, but part of the discussion was also to reduce the base elevations of the property, which was a massive undertaking. If I can just kind of described the site for you, Council Members. This is the subject property. Here is Overland Road and the primary you can see where the mining has primarily occurred in this area. This part -- parcel these parcels over here are part of the Ten Mile project that was previously done also by Idaho Sand and Gravel and is now reclaimed and graded. That was used primarily on the Ten Mile project. Just a couple of the views from the surrounding area. This is from Overland Road. You can see the stockpiles that exist. Those have been reduced significantly since that picture was taken. I guess it depends on what significant is, but a good 35 percent of those piles are gone. This is the view from Val Vista Subdivision. It's hard to see -- at least you can't really see the stockpiles from the road, but those tan areas you can see right here and here, those are the stockpiles. This is the view from the entrance to Aspen Cove. You can see the stockpiles here. And, then, that's the view from Linder down close to phase one of the project. Council Members, the initial request we had, as was stated, was for the 18 month time extension to complete everything, the removal of stockpiles, the reclamation, the grading. We requested an additional 60 days for crushing. And our position was and still is that reclamation and grading are not part of what is required for a conditional use permit. Our effort here is to reach a reasonable resolution. We are not saying we want everything that we applied for with the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission put a six month time frame on completion of the activities on the project and we can do that when it -- as far as the -- the mining and related operations regarding the project. After meeting with staff we, basically, drilled it down to three conditions that we are looking to modify, with the primary element recognizing the difference between reclamation and grading. Condition 1.1.3 is the first conditional we are looking at modifying. As you can see it talks about reclamation being completed by November 1st, 2014, and there is a reference to the grading plan. We will complete the reclamation by November 1st, 2014. But, again, we recognize the difference. Reclamation relates to the mining activities that occur on the site. Reclamation -- I will describe that a little bit more later, but it's dealing with those areas that have been affected, those areas that have been mined on the subject property. Grading is not mining and it doesn't relate to the mining activities on the site. In this case it pertains primarily to those areas that have not been mined and I will go through those. So, our proposal is to add that sentence, that any grading beyond the reclamation of the site required by the Idaho Department of Lands will be completed by the applicant no later than June 1st. So, let me talk a little bit about reclamation. As I said, it deal with the mined areas. What you ultimately have following reclamation is a rough leveling of the mined areas. That one site off of Ten Mile is kind of an example of that, although it has some finish grading that's been completed as well. The slopes on the sides -- there has been significant excavation of this site. The slopes will be graded to three to one ratio and the top soil would be placed on those slopes. Those slopes will be reseeded with the required species under the reclamation plan with the Department of Lands. That meets the requirements of the Department of Lands and it meets the requirements of the bond that we have in place to complete the mining operations on the site. We have been working toward that and, as I said, we will complete that within the six months required by the Planning and Zoning Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 7 of 42 Commission. That goes most of the way toward what the property owner wants to do with the property. This includes removal of our stockpiled material. There is some stockpiled material on site in the form of berms, top soil, those things -- some of those will remain in place. I will show you a map of those for a later buffering of the residential development and some of that will be used on the individual lots for top soil. Mr. Barton also wants to retain some of the material that's been processed for this use. He's going to have to put in roads and other improvements as part of the project. If that's not allowed, then, he would, essentially, be trucking that material from elsewhere onto the site later. If that is allowed we can locate that property on the site so it's not visible from off site, the roadways and pile it in longer, shorter piles, so, again, it's not visible. So, just to kind of go over the site, Council Members, essentially, this is the mined area. That's what will ultimately be reclaimed. This portion in our initial application that we would have liked to have mined if we had been given the opportunity, focuses on that area, this area here, and a little bit of this. Those areas remain essentially untouched or unmined and those are the areas that will be addressed as part of the grading for what the landowner wants to do with their property later. But that's not part of the mining operation, it's not part of the reclamation. And as part of the reclamation you can see, you know, the piles and things that are going on within the mining operation. Those, again, will be graded out so it's, essentially, a rough level floor with the slopes being reseeded. Here is some of the slopes within the interior of the pit, just to give you an idea. Again, that's pretty close to what is needed for the residential development, but these slopes will be reseeded and topped soiled. So, essentially, we complete everything that's related to the mining operations by November 1st. Let me talk about grading. Mining and related activities will be done by November 1st. Grading does not equal mining under the Uniform Development Code. It does not equal mining under Idaho state code. Mining under the city code is essentially operating a commercial sand and gravel operation, processing material, crushing material, washing material, all of that will be done. So, any Council Member here, whether it's Council Member Zaremba or Council Member Milam, if you have ten acres or 20 acres or 80 acres, you can, essentially, go out there and move dirt around, dig holes, fill the holes in kind of to your heart's content. You don't have to have a permit to do that. But when you come around to developing the property and if you want to develop it in a certain way, then, yes, you have to get it zoned, you have to get plats and those kind of things. But prior to that you can kind of push around dirt, do whatever you want. Some may argue that reclamation is related to mining. I think that's a mute point. We don't think it's required for a conditional use permit, but we are saying we will complete reclamation prior to November 1. Since grading does not require a conditional use permit, once we complete this and if we are out of there and we are not -- we have reclaimed the site, Mr. Barton takes it back, he has the ability as the property owner, again, to go in and grade his site to what he wants to do. What we are proposing is to allow us to complete that grading of the property subject to the conditions of the conditional use permit. If Mr. Barton was to do it he wouldn't be subject to those conditions. He wouldn't have the days of operation, the hours of operation, limitations, the requirement to mitigate dust, those things that we are proposing to operate under. This is a schematic showing the final elevations, including grading. So, again, Council Members, the reclamation is primarily in this area. This area is untouched and will be graded -- this area over here Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 8 of 42 and a little bit of this area here. This is going to consist of cuts and fills, some moving some material to fill in low areas and taking some of the lower areas and filling them up and lowering the other areas. There are some of the berms that exist and that will be used for top soil, but also be kept in place. This area up here is mostly reclaimed. The elevations are, essentially, right to where they are supposed to be. Ultimately down in the lower pit, as far as reclamation, that's going to be a little bit lower than what's required or what Mr. Barton desires for a subdivision, because we are going to have to move some of this material from those graded areas in there to get what he wants as far as a grading plan. Ultimately this is what the final grading of the site will look like once it's all graded and reclaimed. Condition 1.1.5 deals with dust control. They placed a condition on there that magnesium chloride be placed on the -- on the stockpiles. To do that damages our ability to use the material for the projects that Idaho Sand has in place. There was an alternative to that to install a sprinkler. Council Members, there isn't a well out there. We do dust control via a water truck. We would propose to be able to do the same thing on the stockpiles. There is a sprayer attachment that can go on the water truck and we can spray the stockpiles. So, our proposal is to modify the condition to allow the stockpiles that we water using the water truck. Condition 1.1.6, primarily -- the main benefit from this condition is that the material be located from -- or loaded from the north part of the stockpiles, so the stockpiles amount to a buffer to the properties to the south for noise and dust. The requirement also is there to move the scale house and scale office. There is, essentially, no benefit to doing that. The trucks drive in a forward loop, so the trucks don't have backup alarms going off if they were to back up. The scale house and scales are already in that forward loop. To move it would have no significance visually. Essentially it's a small -- I will show you pictures of it. It's a small scale house and the scales are located level with the ground and you can't see it, essentially, from most areas of the property. But those that can it's a small impact. It's also located where there is temporary power stubbed to the site and it's located on a foundation, so there is significant cost with no benefit to move those things. I can show you, Council Members, there is the scale house. There is the scales. Previously the trucks used to travel around the edge of the site. The new route with the modified conditional use permit essentially takes it this way. So, that's the loop. They are loaded here on the north end of the piles, they drive around over the scales, and, then, exit. So, always traveling in that forward loop. There is the scale house. It's a small trailer that houses the computer for the scales. I stepped it off. It's six to eight feet wide and 16 to 18 feet long. Those are the scales. So, Council Members, essentially, what we are proposing is a reasonable solution. We will complete all of our mining -related activities by November 1 within the confines of the conditional use permit. We will complete the remaining grading desired by the property owner also within the confines of the CUP, but need until June 1 st to be able to do that. And, then, we are proposing small adjustments to scales and watering requirements, but still meet the objectives of those conditions. With that, Mr. President, Council Members, I will stand for any questions. Rountree: Questions? Bird: I have none at this time. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 9 of 42 Milam: No. Rountree: Thank you, Todd. Lakey: Thanks, Charlie. Rountree: I have a question for staff. With the plats expiring is the DA really, in effect because if we get another application for a preliminary plat that opens that up completely, does it not. Watters: Councilman Rountree, the new preliminary plat would need to comply with the existing provisions in the development agreement. If they do not, then, the development agreement would be required to be modified. Rountree: So, we could have additional requirements in the development agreement. Watters: Yes. Rountree: Okay. Thank you. This is a public hearing. Do I have a list of folks? All right. Thank you. And you're going to have to bear with me on names, so I have -- the first person to sign up is Wyatt Johnson representing the neighborhood association. Johnson: Wyatt Johnson. 3649 North Lake Harbor Lane, Boise, Idaho. And I'm appearing here as a representative of an unincorporated association. It's of the concerned neighbors against the Southridge Gravel Mining extension and, Madam Clerk, I have got a list of the members. Holman: Thank you. Do you need it back? Johnson: No, I don't. Actually, for the benefit of the Council, could everybody that I'm representing please show by raise of hand? So, anyway, where I'd like to start is -- Rountree: Excuse me, Wyatt. Johnson: Certainly. Rountree: You said you were speaking for a group. You will get more time. Johnson: All right. Rountree: And if we could have an address. Johnson: Yes. It was 3649 North Lake Harbor Lane -- Rountree: Okay. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 10 of 42 Johnson: --Boise. Rountree: Thank you. Johnson: You bet. Rountree: Now roll. Johnson: Why don't we start with the proposition that the recommendation that staff initially prepared on this conditional use permit and the decision that was rendered by the Planning and Zoning Commission, is a good decision. It was good work. The staff and Planning and Zoning Commission looked at this matter carefully and the neighbors fully support the conditional use permit as it is written. It's -- that's our starting point. Now, going on I think that the best place to focus is not -- recognizing it's a de novo hearing, but it's not to rehash all the points of contention that we went through, because it seems that there is not really any dispute, except for on three, four discrete points. And so what I want to address are those four -- those three or four discrete points and -- am I able to move this or -- Watters: Yes. If you press a selection tool -- I believe it's an arrow at the top of the board. Johnson: Okay. Watters: Use the stylist. Do you see the arrows? Johnson: No. I don't. Chatterton: Lower left-hand corner. Johnson: Yeah. They don't -- ah, there we go. There we go. Great. The first point that we have is Council should not extend the time frame on the conditional use permit. Right now staff in the current permit says, look, everything needs to be done within six months. Idaho Sand and Gravel says, well, we will do some of it within six months, but we want an additional year to complete other work and there are good reasons not to do this and it really -- if you will, it's -- Idaho Sand and Gravel has -- they have had dinner and they don't want to pay the check. All this work that the neighbors are requesting is work that was promised -- it was the price of admission. It was what Idaho Sand and Gravel promised in order to get this conditional use permit in the first place. Now that it's time to pay that check they don't want to honor it and they want to do something different and I think the first point that we need to make is that -- and as the Commission is aware, is that when we are talking about whether or not something requires a conditional use permit, that's very different from the issue of whether or not the condition of approval needs to be complied with. We all know and, of course, the statute very well comes in and says, look, if somebody comes in and they seek permission from the Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 11 of 42 City Council to do something that they cannot do -- for instance, dropping a gravel -- gravel pit into the middle of a residential subdivision -- the Council can go ahead and impose conditions -- or the Planning and Zoning Commission can impose conditions upon that and that's just as enforceable -- regardless of whether or not a conditional use permit would be required for that and in this case the condition is the grading, the reclamation, and their claim is, look, that doesn't require a conditional use permit. Oh, it doesn't matter, because all the cleanup work was part of the original deal to begin with. If you will note on January 20th, 2011, at the original hearing the condition of approval that was included by staff was that in 19 months all reclamation of the site shall be completed prior to the end of the approved use. That was the deal. One and done. Idaho Sand and Gravel, you're in, you're out. In 18 months it's as if you were never there. And I went back and just -- looking at that and now they area coming in and they are saying, well, yeah, okay, well, reclamation and grading, you know, those are really two technically different things and it's a little bit of double speak, because the fact of the matter is the statement -- the application that was submitted and the term reclamation meant the reclamation grading. When Idaho Sand and Gravel came in and proposed the deal, they said, okay, here is what we are going to do, we are going to do the reclamation, which the department of lands goes ahead and they have got standards that meet that and there is a time frame that meets that, but the city imposed their own standards, said you will meet those standards, you will meet it in 18 months. Grading was part of that deal and if you go back and I went back and I looked at the record and looking at page five of the original staff report that was attached and incorporated within this decision, after the heading reclamation it states the grading plan submitted by the applicant demonstrates the reclamation of the site after mining and grading. Staff -- everybody was talking about reclamation, grading, that was what Idaho Sand and Gravel was processing at the outset. For them to come in now and say that it's something different is double speak, so that they can circumvent the requirements that they initially -- they initially presented. This was part of the deal. This is what they were offering where they wanted it. Now that they have been in they have put in the gravel pit, they don't want to comply and they are saying these are two different things. And it's not unfair. It's not unfair, because they knew the deal in 2011. In 2012 when they came in for an extension it was quite clear, then, too, because on the extension the Planning and Zoning Commission said at the end of this period the site shall be graded as shown on the reclamation plan attached in Exhibit A -- or Exhibit A-3. So, again, in 2012 everybody knew the deal. Nobody was saying grading and reclamation, nobody was saying those are two different things. It was the same deal. The idea is Idaho Sand and Gravel, you're going to have a gravel permit, but you can't have it forever, it's one and done and at the end of the period you're gone. Well, at the most recent hearing for the Planning and Zoning Commission, again, they raised the issue and this is when they started trying to separate it, because the time frame came up, they were at the end of their three years and they wanted some additional time. So, the Planning and Zoning Commission was quite clear, they said, okay, look, we are going to talk about grading -- oops. Grading and reclamation. We are not messing around. We are done playing games. That's where Planning and Zoning came in and, frankly, it's the appropriate result. This is not a surprise. It's not unfair. It's exactly what Idaho Power knew that they were getting into -- or, excuse me, Idaho Sand and Gravel knew that Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 12 of 42 they were getting into at the outset. Idaho Power is not a problem today. It's just now they have got some other motive that they want to move forward. Now, they very well could have started taking action long ago. It's not like they didn't see this coming. This has been coming years in the making. They went through -- they had trouble when they came in for the extension in 2012, they could have started taking some action then. They knew that this was coming due April -- April 4th. They took no action. Here is what we have now. That is the site. You can see the -- you can see that they have got the -- well, it's a gravel pit and it does -- there is no reclamation, there is no grading, it's clearly a big open pit. They have taken no steps to move forward in taking care of that. So, it's -- this is clear that this seems to be -- well, in all fairness it seems to be some double speak. Rountree: Might I interrupt? What's the date of the photograph? Johnson: This photo -- I believe this is what the -- if I -- from this -- this is what the site presently looks like. Okay. That's yesterday. Rountree: Thank you. Johnson: So -- now, this is something that's subtle, but it's important. In the statement that they have submitted they state, well, stockpiling that they are going to leave some material, they are not going to haul material on and off, but they are going to leave some new material for the next owner and this is a bit of a game, because what they are doing is they are breaching the deal in that the idea was you put a gravel pit in here. Gravel pits do not belong in residential neighbors. You need to be in and out. That was the deal. The stockpiling issue, along with the grading, is another issue where they are looking to end run this. They note almost as an aside -- they say, well -- and, of course, we are going to leave some stockpiling materials for the owner to use. All right. That's not part of the deal. That's breaching the agreement and the reason why is if you're talking about stockpiling -- one, let's talk about the fact that there is no plat right now, there is no approved plat. We have no subdivision. There is nothing in the works. The plat's expired. While we all hope that the developer that owns the land now, comes in and develops a fine subdivision and they move forward and it's profitable for the developer and good for the community, as we all know, the best laid plans do not always come to fruition. We have had five, six, seven years of that. So, this is a project that may be developed soon, it may be developed never. So, a portion of the stockpiled material is going to be retain for the owner for the use on the property. What use? There is no use. There is no plat. The owner has not got anything in place and that is just writing a blank check. Now, the problem with that is that the stockpiles -- this is what we are talking about on the stockpiles, they will stockpile some material and we don't know how much material, but right now there is a lot of material out there. Stockpiles are -- if you will, stockpiles are part of mining operations. It says, look, the stockpile is for future use, as opposed for current use, but it's part of the mining operation. Stockpiling the minerals requires a conditional use permit and if it doesn't -- if it doesn't, okay, fine. The alternative is if we are storing materials there, it's a contractor's yard, which isn't allowed conditional or otherwise in this district. So, there is Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 13 of 42 no good -- there is no good excuse for the stockpiling. Again, the result is they should have this done and complete -- it should be done within the six months and if you will indulge me just a couple more minutes. Maybe I have been entertaining. Rountree: Just a couple more Johnson: Okay. I would like to make one quick note that Idaho Sand and Gravel came in and originally asked for an additional 60 days of mining and I'd like to point out that Council should feel somewhat gamed, because from the time that this decision was issued on April 17th -- of course as you know when an appeal is put in place a stay goes into effect and what has happened since the approval, note that the Planning and Zoning condition was, look, the mining stops now and the record is full of testimony of how problematic this is in the residential area. But what they did is they note that there is a clear statement that says no more mining, we are not going to do it, instead what they have done is -- well, no pictures. They have gone and they have been mining pit run as fast as they can since the entry of that first order. So, the appeal has, essentially, served as a de facto extension. The city should feel gamed. Neighbors feel gamed. We ask that the appeal be denied. We ask that the planning and zoning conditional use permit as stated be left in place. Thank you. Any questions? Rountree: Any questions? Bird: I have none. Zaremba: Mr. President? Rountree: David. Zaremba: Mr. President, thank you. Address the moving of the scales for a moment if you would. It sounds to me the comments of the applicant that the truck pattern would be the same even if the scale moved and there might be -- not be that much gained. Johnson: I actually -- there are -- there is -- Tony Martarano can explain that to the witness to explain the moving of the trucks. I can tell you what he's going to say briefly. What he is going to explain is the current location of the truck scales coordinates with the loading and all of the -- all of the loading and unloading and the movement of the materials. When they get in and they move the materials on a certain side of the site it disturbs the -- it disturbs the stockpiles, raises all of the dust into the air, blows over the neighbors. The idea with the movement of the scale was that it will cause this activity to be moved onto the other side of the site, which is on the other side of the stockpile, which when they get in there, they are doing their work, they are disturbing this ground, I mean they are already -- and, frankly, it's a fair request, because they are already -- they should already be on borrowed time. Because they are going to say, look, if you are going to get up there and you're going to stir up this dust and you're going to move this material, at least do it on the other side of the stockpile, so we can at least take advantage of the barrier. They look, frankly, like the pyramids to me. Those stockpiles Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 14 of 42 are creating -- it's at least a way to mitigate this problem in the meantime while they are going to be moving this material. Tony Martarano can explain that better and Tony Martarano can also explain the technical components of the -- the dust control chemicals. Zaremba: Thank you. Johnson: Thank you. Rountree: Other questions? Bird: I have none. Rountree: Thank you Johnson: Thank you. Rountree: So, as I successfully or unsuccessfully decipher your name from this list, we are going to start down the list. David McCullough. He doesn't want to testify. Thank you. Curtis Elton. I will suggest that those folks that were represented by Mr. Johnson -- if you are going to also provide testimony to something other than what was represented by Mr. Johnson -- Elton: I'm sorry, what did you say? Rountree: Those of you who are represented by Mr. Johnson and wish to provide additional testimony, would you direct your testimony to something other than what he testified to. Elton: Okay. My name is Curtis Elton. I live at 2906 West Val Vista and, basically, I -- the previous meeting I represented our subdivision and I had a signed petition on the 13 landowners, ten of them had requested no extension of the mining operation and to follow the regulations that were set down in the last meeting. We have put up with dust for years, for summers, it just is a continual process of trying to maintain a home within reason, because the dust comes from the northwest and it blows right across and now we have the sand dunes up there or the gravel dunes out there -- it just blows right across the top and we continually get dust in our homes. If we have windows open it's -- you can write your name on our kitchen table any one day after we have had doors or windows open and we have had trouble in the past with them trying -- with them trying to keep up with water trucks, because if they keep up with water trucks fast enough it gets muddy. If they don't we get the dust and it's been a continual process for several summers and we all would like to see an end to this as soon as possible. All of the homeowners, except four -- two abstained and two others evidently like the flavor of dust, the rest of us wanted to see no extension on the mining operation whatsoever and reclaim the land as soon as possible and get it back within reason for our own homes. Thank you. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 15 of 42 Rountree: Thank you. Tony Martarano. Martarano: Council President, Councilors, I'm also representing a group. I need a couple more minutes if I would and I'd like to address a couple of the technical issues that everybody has questioned. Rountree: Just, please, address issues that have not been previously brought up and -- Martarano: Explained? Rountree: -- and we have had one representative of the group, so you will be an individual. Martarano: I'm actually representing four other individuals. Rountree: Okay. Martarano: A little bit about myself. My name is Tony Martarano. My address is 2030 West Aspen Cove Drive. My background -- I have been in the road construction, sand and gravel business for 25 years. I currently am the owner of C&A Paving Company in Boise, Idaho. As you have heard a neighbor testify, our biggest concern in this whole ordeal has been the dust, the nonstop airborne. As far as a gravel pit in general is concerned, Idaho Sand and Gravel, by any industry standards, has done a good job. Nobody is saying they are not a good operator. The problem we have here is the gravel pit is in a subdivision and there were not -- that was not taken into account when the standards were written. Because of this special circumstance and in the spirit of cooperation, we came up with some dust control measures that would help us as a neighborhood and P&Z was kind enough to incorporate those in their conditions of approval. In Idaho Sand and Gravel's letter June 16th they asked the Council to do away with those conditions. They said they were either not possible or would create undue financial hardship. Magnesium chloride was the first. They say that the Magnesium Chloride will render their stockpiles useless. I have used mag chloride on my haul roads and gravel pits occasionally and it works. Our application can -- one application can last for several months, whereas water is dried up and gone as soon as the wind blows and it's dry. The only way for water to work is if it's continuously applied, especially to a stockpile. As far as the chemical makeup of mag chloride is concerned, here is a couple of sources that I looked up, because I'm not an expert per se on mag chloride. Wikipedia says mag chloride is, in effect, salt water. It's highly soluble in water, hydrated magnesium chloride can be extracted from brine or sea water. The mag chloride we get here in the northwest comes mostly from the great lake -- Great Salt Lake brine basin. Some mag chloride is actually made from evaporated sea water. This -- this chemical is not harmful or toxic and it's not required to be labeled or handled as harmful or toxic. Mag chloride is very common and highly used as an effective form of dust control, soil stabilization, and erosion mitigation. Epa.gov's website says -- their section on dust control says mag chloride actually absorbs water from the air and holds Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 16 of 42 onto it. It binds fine dust together and resists evaporation. When applied properly it lasts for a long time. There is another up side to mag chloride -- as you saw in the picture that was up there, the stockpile and if you noticed on the face of those stockpiles the erosion that was taking place, that is the dust that's left those piles and that's hitting us as neighbors. Mag chloride actually prevents dusting or erosion when applied to gravel. It binds with the fine material and prevents the fine material in the gravel from becoming airborne. IS&G stated that the mag chloride would make their material useless. I think it actually helps keep it in spec. Because of the erosion that takes place in the piles those outer layers of that material would theoretically be out of spec, because the finely graded material are no longer there. I spoke with an independent lab, as well as the highway department on this question. Would mag chloride damage any of my stockpiles if I used it on them for dust control. Both answers were the same. Neither of them had ever checked on that before and neither of them could see how it could possibly damage the material. Mag chloride works. It's not typical in a gravel pit application for stockpiles, but it is typical in gravel pits for dust control. Again, this is not a typical situation. The stockpiles are the majority of the reason that we have the dust problems we have. The second issue that Idaho Sand had issue with -- Wyatt Johnson touched on, which was the scale house. The scale house -- the whole point of moving the scale house -- it actually had had absolutely nothing to do with visual appearance or eye sore. The thought behind that is if we could get the truck route and the scales moved to the north side of these piles and keep any truck traffic from coming to the south side for any reason while the reclamation was taking place in what is now currently the mine, it would -- it would go a long way to help the dust problem as well. There is no reason we couldn't do that, other than the trucks wouldn't be able to go into the bottom pit and dump and haul back out. They stated that the scales are on a concrete foundation and that the power is there and couldn't be moved. I would say -- there is a couple solutions to that. First off, the concrete foundation, if it is there, is probably going to have to go away in four months anyway. Scales can be set on a temporary block. A temporary power pole can be set in there and the power can be moved. Or you can use a generator to run the little scale house and the scales and if you don't like any of that you could -- you could also use a loader with bucket scales and a printer and it will do away with the whole operation. Is that my time? Rountree: If you would wind down I would appreciate it Martarano: I guess in closing I would say that I believe the conditions that were imposed could be complied with. I think it's simply excuses from a company that doesn't want to change what they are currently doing. As stated before repeatedly we have been dealing with this dust for a long time. We are looking for a reasonable solution to our dust problem during the final six month conclusion period. I appreciate your time. I will stand for any questions that you have. Rountree: Any questions? Bird: I have none. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 17 of 42 Rountree: Thank you. Martarano: Thank you. Rountree: Jerry Ross. Ross: Jerry Ross. 2302 West Aspen Cove Drive in Meridian. Council Members, first and foremost, if I may, I would just like to show you -- this is a sampling of the dust that collects around our place. You're welcome to take a closer look if you please. You see it's extremely fine. We had that sent into Analytical Laboratories in Boise. It came back at 87.5 percent silica. Silica creates a health condition known as silicosis. It's extremely hazardous and irreversible. This is what we live with every day when you see that dust coming off of those stockpiles. One of the questions that I'd like to pose to Mr. Lakey is why are we arguing to change conditions that he conceded to in the Planning and Zoning meeting just in April. If you refer to the minutes of that meeting, page 32 -- and I quote: We are willing to be subject to a condition that occur on the north side of the pile and I believe that the scale has been moved to that location and that will happen moving forward. He thought it had been moved already. We are willing to water the pile if that's what you want. They agreed in April to those conditions. They haven't followed through with any of them, but they agreed to it then. Why should we be assured now that that's going to happen moving forward when they conceded to it originally? The other point that I would like to make is the height of the pile has been a big case for Mr. Lakey. While the height of the piles are a concern, it's primarily a concern because of what comes off of those because of the dust. They are enormous. The wind comes sweeping directly over there and you see it throwing and coming across. As you look out to the valley it's obscured in as little as a 15 to 20 mile an hour wind and when we get the 40 mile per hour winds coming through there you're enamored with it. If you walk out into our yard when that is happening you can feel it coat your skin. You can see it as you move back in. He mentioned also the areas that are untouched, areas that grading has been done. He's correct. No grading has been done in three and a half years to this reclamation project, which is what it was supposed to start out as. The areas directly across my fence line -- and mine is one of the properties that borders theirs -- has had nothing done to it but top soil pushed onto it. That's all that has been done. That's one of the areas that he highlight when he was pointing out to you. They have weeds that tall, which presents its own hazard, in my opinion as we come -- especially as we come into winter months -- or, excuse me, summer months. No effort has been done for any control on that -- on that factor. He mentioned the stockpiles will be gone by November 1st and the question I would ask is in April six months was no way, any way enough time to remove those piles. How is four months now enough time? How can we get it done in four months now by November 1st, as per what he just stated, if we couldn't get it done and no effort has been made? The other point I'd like to touch on -- the city has mentioned several times in their meetings and to the media -- they had a concern about whether or not they can truly regulate mining and my argument would be to regulate the conditions of this permit you don't need to have an understanding of mining. I have no understanding of mining. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 18 of 42 The majority of my neighbors, with the exception of Tony, have no understanding of mining -- Rountree: If you could summarize, please. Ross: Yes, sir. The things that we are asking for, the conditions to be met, are all purely visual. It's very easy to look and see if that scale house has been moved from one line to the other. It's very easy to determine if those stockpiles are gone. It is very easy to determine if -- per the conditions, 1.1.2, reclamation of the site shall begin immediately, leaving the areas where the stockpiles are located until last. That's all visual. Should be able to be enforced. In summary I would ask that you, please, enforce the conditions that were put in place by Planning and Zoning and the time frame or lock the gates and ask them to leave the premises. Thank you. Rountree: Any questions? Bird: I have none. Rountree: Thank you. Ross: Thank you. Anybody want to see that? Rountree: If you could give that to the city clerk. Then once you do you are going to lose it. Ross: We got lots more. Rountree: Okay. Cavener: Mr. President? Rountree: Did you have a question, Luke? Cavener: I do actually have a question for the speaker. Sir? Rountree: Jerry. Cavener: For Jerry. I was just curious, what was the amount of time that it took you to accumulate that much dust to put in your bag? Ross: Sweep off the patio once. Rountree: Diane Ebeling. And you indicated you were against the extension. Bob and Nadeen Marstad. You're against. Okay. Nancy Kendall. Thank you. Lisa Martarano. Okay. Jack Haven. Thank you. Loren or Lorraine Ross. Thank you. Cindy Bennett? Thank you. And Paul Bennett. Thank you. Maureen Brewer. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 19 of 42 Brewer: Maureen Brewer. 2112 West Aspen Cove Drive. Mr. President, I will keep my comments very brief. I just wanted to add that for me personally this is about my family. This is about my quality of life and that of my neighbors. I have a black lab at home. I have a 17 month old toddler. I have a little girl due at the end of the summer. My husband and I didn't move into this neighborhood with the intention of raising our children in a gravel pit or next door to an active mine. This is real life. This is my life. This is my neighbors' life. It's our kids and our grandkids. This isn't some hypothetical, you can see it in the pictures yourselves. This isn't some theory. This is happening. For all intents and purposes the message so far as been that Idaho Sand and Gravel believes they get to call the shots, they get to do whatever they want on their timeline and provide any old excuse for it and the rest of us just have to deal with it. That doesn't sit well with me. I have an obligation to advocate for my neighborhood, for my family, for my son and for my unborn daughter. Thank you. Rountree: Any questions? Bird: I have none. Rountree: Thank you. This is a guess. Glen Hickey. You have deferred. Okay. And you're against. Rich Brecker. Against. Ryan Russell. And you indicated you are for. Russell: Yes. So, my name is Ryan Russell. I live at 5532 North Fox Run Way in Meridian, Idaho. I'm here representing Idaho Sand and Gravel. Really I just wanted to address a couple of technical points that were brought up here in past testimony and, then, really stand for any questions that you all may have of me. So, let's just clarify in the loading of materials. Currently we are loading out of the north side of the stockpiles and we agree with that condition. It buffers the residents from the dust and from the noise of that -- of the loader and that operation. One of the restrictions that was put on us is that the neighbors didn't want to hear backup beepers on trucks, so trucks need to pull in the site and circle around the site and leave the site, always going in a forward motion. Okay. So, whether the scale is moved or not they will still make the exact same loop they are making right now and they will always be loaded on the north side of that pile. So, you know, just to clarify that condition. One other thing, too, is Mr. Johnson mentioned that removal of pit run is not allowed on the site per the CUP extension, which was granted by Planning and Zoning. The paragraph that he had up there right when he said that clearly states that that is an allowable use under the CUP extension and that continues to happen right now. So, just so we are all clear on that. That material is loaded out and hauled off. Mag chloride, you know, Mr. Martarano, owner of a construction company and gravel pits himself, you know, he stated it himself, he doesn't know what mag chloride will do to these piles. We believe that they will degrade the quality that we need to have in our piles to be able to sell to the state of Idaho. Specifically he mentioned having bucket scales on a loader, which is getting way too technical for this conversation, but that's -- it's not an allowable way to measure weight of material for the state of Idaho and with a lot of the clients that we have. So, that is not an option for us. We do have to scale this material on a certified scale. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 20 of 42 Other than that I just wanted to point out that from day one -- a lot of these people were not here on day one when we came with this conditional use permit and this request. From day one we always stated that this was a market driven condition. This -- to be able to move the amount of material we have out of here in three years has been a tremendous feat. A ton of material has been moved out of this site. The original plan for this site was to lower the elevation of the site to protect the permanent views of the neighbors. Okay? So, they have all been supportive of this mining operation to begin with, because they wanted to preserve their views of the valley. Lowering the site is -- Rountree: Folks, excuse me. Let's be civil. Russell: So, to be clear, the people that participated in the original CUP they -- that was their intent and so that's really what started this whole thing. We are going to be left short. You know, we have asked for more time than we have been granted. We are fine with that. Ultimately it's going to leave excess material on the site and it's got to be dealt this and it will be. We are just asking for a little bit of time to make sure we uphold -- really hold our end of the bargain up and get completed out there. So, if you have any questions for me I would be glad to answer them. Bird: Mr. President? Rountree: Mr. Bird. Bird: This isn't really a question. Take this as a statement. Regardless of what happens tonight, I hope that within this week those weeds are down around your property. Okay? Russell: Yes, sir. Rountree: Other questions? Cavener: Mr. President? Rountree: Luke. Cavener: Just a point of clarification. You indicated that you sell your gravel to the state and that -- and you were concerned that the magnesium chloride could degrade your product, you wouldn't be able to sell it to them. Have you had any indication from the state that they wouldn't purchase that and what was their rational for that? Russell: You know, we have not treated our material ever in the past with that chemical and we have never experienced what that would do. In my experience it's been used on roads -- haul roads specifically and when put down on roads it retains a lot of moisture and becomes slick, really greasy -- it works in dust compression that's for sure. You know, one of the things we have seen is that the EPA does actually regulate mag chloride. It is a regulated chemical. In excess it can actually contaminate groundwater, Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 21 of 42 so, I don't know, there is a lot of concerns that we would like to address before we treat our material with a chemical. Cavener: Follow up? But nothing from the state saying they wouldn't purchase your product if it was treated? Russell: We have never asked, we have never tested it, and we have never tried. Cavener: Okay. Thank you. Rountree: Further questions? Thank you. Appreciate your time. Russell: Thanks. Rountree: Richard Kelly. And you're against. Very good. Thank you. Brian Shay. Thank you. Randall Petrovic. Thank you. Keith Ebeling. Ebeling: Members of the Council, my name is Keith Ebeling and I live at 2150 Aspen Cove Drive. I'm going to keep this short, because they have done a good job of explaining what's happening. I just had a couple of points I'd like to make. Number one, I have been living very close to this project for three years and to be perfectly honest, I don't trust Idaho Sand and Gravel. They don't do what they say they are going to do. For three years they have been going to reduce their -- the level of that grade and they haven't done it. They have start times and finish times -- they have started before they was supposed to start. They finished after they was supposed to finish. They have worked on the weekends. I personally had to call the police and have them shut down. This is why I don't trust these people. They don't do what they say. Now, Mr. Russell has got up and said on several occasions how he wants to be a good neighbor. I don't need neighbors like that. Thank you. The other thing is as he just mentioned that they were hauling out of the north side of that pile. Well, this afternoon I heard them loading their trucks up with ore, which I thought they weren't supposed to be able to mine anymore ore, so I drove up and I watched. They were hauling ore out of the pit. They were going right by the south end of the pile around the north -- not just hauling from the north side of that. And the other option they had when they put this thing together and if they don't put the chemical on this they could put PVC pipes over there and water that thing, because, I will tell you, for three years I have suffered. I have a dry hacking cough that I have developed since this whole thing came in and a lot of my neighbors are complaining of the same symptoms and if I thought there was any chance that these people would do what they say they would do -- but they didn't do it in the first 18 months, they didn't do it in the second 18 months, and I would almost lay odds that in six months they would be back here saying, hey, guys, guess what, we need another shot, because we couldn't get it done. And to quote that famous philosopher from the New York Yankees baseball Yogi Berra, it's deja vu all over again. Thank you. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 22 of 42 Rountree: Thank you. Nancy Brutter. Can't read your writing, Nancy. Robert Carlson. Okay. Susan Carlson. And I think it's David Cordova. Okay. And Janice Cordova. Okay. Thank you. Sylvia Liddell. And Gary. If you wish to speak to the Council you need to come up here. Okay. Thank you. Council, are there any further questions of staff? Okay. Applicant. Excuse me, Todd. We have people who wish to testify. Then, please, come up here and approach Council. Oh. And I see some hands waiving in the very far back. Okay. Hickey: My name is Glen Hickey. I live at 2143 Aspen Cove Drive in Meridian. Ryan Russell got up here and said that they are making a tremendous effort to lower this grade and I don't think anybody's really made much of a plan of all the material that they are hauling back in there and it's really going to take a long time as long as that continues. They are not going to make any headway at all on lowering the grade. I think that's -- you ought to take into consideration. Rountree: Okay Hickey: Thanks. Rountree: Thank you. The gentleman in the back. I usually see this guy on an elliptical machine, but -- Przybos: Steve Przybos. I live at 2530 South Del Rey Lane. I'm directly behind the project. And I just want to say the first two meetings we had for this project there was nobody here. Nobody came to find out what was going on. I was here. And you guys approved it. The second time they came for an extension there was nobody here. And all of a sudden they are complaining. If they were here they would have got a copy of the grading, they would have known what was going on. They were doing this for the benefit of us to keep 800,000 dollar houses from look at peaks of roofs and stuff like that. And now all of a sudden everybody is complaining -- you know, they don't even let them finish their project. Sure, they are taking about -- they are taking out gravel now, they are not mining it, they are cutting the grade down like they were -- they were supposed to. And, you know, everybody should have known about this, they should have come to the meeting and they would have known exactly the timeline and even on the third time I was at City Council -- or the Planning and Zoning, they asked me if I would approve a third and I said at the time if they need a little bit more I could -- so, nobody else was here at that meeting. That's all I have to say. Rountree: Thank you. Zaremba: Mr. President, may I ask some questions? Rountree: Steve, we have a question for you. Mr. Zaremba. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 23 of 42 Zaremba: This is a question I probably should have asked earlier, but since you're here I will ask you. The mining operation, as I understand it, also includes a crushing operation. You're saying what they are doing now is not mining. Are they crushing -- Przybos: They are not crushing anything. Zaremba: That has stopped entirely? Przybos: Everything is gone. All the crusher and stuff is gone. Just basically they are taking pit run -- the natural pit run for the grade. I mean if it was all dirt they would be grading the dirt off. Zaremba: I'm sorry, Mr. Chairman -- or Mr. President, a follow-up question. Somebody mentioned pit run earlier and I have no idea what that is. Przybos: That's just natural gravel and sand mixed. Zaremba: Okay. Thank you. Przybos: Nothing has been crushed. Zaremba: Doesn't require digging and crushing; is that what you're saying? Thank you Rountree: The gentleman in the back. I need you up here. Bower: My name is Jacob Bower. I live at 2300 Aspen Cove and I'm against. I just moved into the neighborhood, so I didn't know about the previous meetings. But I was against it the whole time. Rountree: Thank you. Martarano: Hello. My name is Lisa Martarano and I live at 2030 West Aspen Cove Drive. One of the pictures that they are showing you up there is -- is a backyard. You can see half a kitchen and half a fence and the pile. That one. That's our backyard. That monstrous pile -- there is nothing between our backyard with the outdoor kitchen we had built and the pool that we have blocking any of that dust and it comes directly into our yard. There is no way to keep it out. It's disgusting. The vegetation and weeds that they had said earlier about blocking it, those are apparently the weeds that they are not supposed to even have there. There is no -- there is nothing between that stockpile and our house. They had said something about selling pit run to the state. Well, for one thing that is only putting pennies in their pocket. Actually, dollars. Also, it's not just the state hauling pit run out. I mean I could probably watch and name ten, 20 different trucking companies. They are not just going there for whatever. In some of the pictures you see trucks dumping -- they are dumping -- the dirt and stuff that they are dumping there has garbage in it. Why on earth would they have to haul it in to dump it there to eventually have to get rid of it? That does not make -- to me it does not make a lot of Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 24 of 42 sense. And then they said about the mag chloride, it could possibly damage their material. How long does it take for mag chloride to actually damage material? Because technically in four months all that should have to be gone. As of the last hearing on April 4th, the day that -- it was the last hearing. They were still mining and crushing. They were already supposed to have been stopped and out of there and, then, they asked for the extension. Nothing has been done to clear up any of it. We see the trucks all the time. And if you look at these pictures, all taken at various times you will not see one water truck anywhere. The piles -- you know what, they show them from a distance. We show the vegetation, which is like somebody out of the ground taking a picture looking up. This is actual -- this is what we get to face with our yards every single day and it's -- we can't even go sit out in our backyard and enjoy our backyard because of all the dust. It's just -- you know, enough is enough. I mean they have proved time and again that, well, you know, we are just going to ask for another one and -- I mean it's got to the point where -- come on. You know, they need to comply with what was originally set forth at the last meeting and they need to get themselves out of our neighborhood. They do not belong there. The gravel pit does not belong in a neighborhood, in a subdivision, and I think they have had plenty enough time, especially since they have made zero effort at all to move anything, except for selling it for the trucks that are coming in and out and as I mentioned as far as the dumping -- Rountree: Summarize. Martarano: That's basically my summary. Rountree: Okay. Thank you. Martarano: Any questions? Thank you. Rountree: Thank you. Przybos: I'm Susan Przybos and I live at 2530 South Del Rey Lane and we sit adjacent to the project. There is water trucks that all the time -- I don't know if everybody -- we can see from our second story right into this whole project and there is water trucks there when I get up in the morning, I see water trucks all day, they are doing a very good job. We don't have dust. But I'm one for -- we are in this, let's finish it right. It needs to be reclaimed the way it was supposed to be, ready to put the homes, whatever is supposed to go in there. We don't want to look at this the rest of our life and if you make them not -- leave without finishing the project, then, the whole -- everybody loses. Everybody -- because if they pull up and go that isn't going to go away, the dust isn't going to be reclaimed, the land needs to be taken to the building plat plan, reclaimed, and, then, if these people think that there is not going to be dust when they start digging foundations, making roads, the dust isn't going to go away until that's all a subdivision or -- I don't know whatever it's going to be. But it needs to be finished and finished right, so the value of the property owners, surrounding for the City of Meridian -- nothing is going to be done if they have to quit in the middle of their project. I say let them finish until it's done right. Thank you. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 25 of 42 Rountree: Anyone else wish to testify? Seeing none, okay, Todd. Lakey: Mr. President, Council Members, again, Todd Lakey, 141 East Carlton, Meridian, Idaho, for the record. Council Members, Idaho Sand has been a responsible operator over the years. Appreciate the testimony of some of the neighbors. Start out with 18 months. That was an opportunity for them to prove theirselves. They came back at the end of those 18 months and showed they had a good record. There was no opposition. They were given the additional time to operate and there was initially a clause in there that said no additional extensions. That was removed and specifically addressed that we had the opportunity to come back in and ask for additional time. The applicant's representative stated that we would complete everything. We promised we would complete everything within three years absolutely. We have been very clear -- he leaves out the context. We have been very clear that this was a market driven project and the time to complete the entire property was an estimate and they came pretty close. They are ten to 15 percent away if they were to complete all of the -- the mining to remove everything. But Planning and Zoning Commission and the city determined, no, we want you to stop before you get everything mined and, again, we are willing to live with that. We will complete the mining operations and the related operations within those six month -- those six months that have been given. The mining operation will be cleaned up. Council Member Zaremba, as was stated, there is no crushing going on on the property. All of that is removed. Essentially what we are talking about now is removing the stockpiled material and reclaiming the site and those are the things that we have been involved in since the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision and continue to follow through on today. The applicant's representative also stated that there is no use approved on the property. That's simply not true. There is a binding development agreement that's in place on the property. The property is zoned. Yes, the plat's expired, but you don't have to have a plat, as we stated again, to grade the property. When we are complete with the reclamation of the site and closing of the mining operation, again, Mr. Barton can go in there and move things around to his heart's content. He may waste his time and money and not do something that's ultimately approved, but he has the ability and the authority to do that. And, Council Members, I don't want you to be gamed. The applicant's representative briefly showed the condition that some of the -- those in opposition referenced, 1.1.1, in relation to Idaho Sand's removal of material from the site. The condition reads: No further mining excavation material from the ground or processing, screening, crushing of material shall be allowed on the site. Don't stop there. You got to keep reading. It says this does not include the removal of native, unprocessed material that may need to be removed from the site to achieve the final grade shown on the approved grading plan, which is allowed. That's what they have been doing is reminding -- removing and excavating pit run, which is native, unprocessed material. It's still used in construction, but they have been complying with the conditional use permit and those conditions that are in place. I think we addressed those conditions. Council Members, we can control the dust through more appropriate means that do not -- does not put our material at risk by watering with a water truck. Again, there is not a well at the site. That's how we water the roads. Now, some of those in opposition mentioned that they haven't seen a picture Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 26 of 42 of a water truck. Well, if you look at a lot of their pictures those piles are wet, you see puddles, and you see dark spots on the roadways. They must have just missed the water truck. I appreciate the neighbor that mentions water trucks are out there constantly. They do a good job in trying to control dust. But, again, it's a gravel operation, so we need to take steps to do that. But we have been responsible in our efforts to do that. I think the scale house and backup alarms were adequately addressed. The trucks are going to go that way anyway. It doesn't make any sense to move that. Mr. Ross briefly mentioned the dust and the silica. Council Members, it's not the presence of dust and silica -- silica is one of the most common elements on the planet and it's found in everything. It's the size of silica particles and they say it's fine, but we kind of went past the internet research, we had an environmental scientist come on site and take samples. There was not quantities of silica that posed a risk of silicosis as a result of the operation. I'm not sure -- Council Members, my time is up. I would simple conclude by saying we will complete the gravel and mining operations and reclamation of the property within the six months. We simply want to be able to complete the grading -- the untouched portions of the property to complete what the landowner wants to do with the site in the future under the conditions of the new conditional use permit and we need additional time to do that. With that, Council Members, I'd stand for any questions. Bird: Mr. President? Rountree: Mr. Bird. Bird: Mr. Lakey, if -- how close is this property to the canal? Lakey: Council Member Bird, I can show you here on this exhibit. I think. Bird: I wish we could go to a different -- Lakey: Maybe not. Bird: There we go. There we go. Lakey: You can see in the blue -- I'm not sure why I'm not getting green. Not getting color. You can see in the blue, Council Member Bird, the canal. It abuts the canal on a portion. There is a berm built up between the site and -- Bird: Why couldn't we look doing like they do in sawmills and seeing if we could take a pump and put in there and, then, put some sprinklers on top of that and have water going on top every so often. I don't know whether -- maybe we would have too much erosion or something, but that would definitely help keep the dust down off of those piles. I can -- especially when the wind and stuff comes up that they would be doing something like that. And, then, one other question. The fill that we are seeing brought back in there -- I know it's not top soil, because it's got everything wrapped in it, but is that onsite fill or is that being brought from another location? Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 27 of 42 Lakey: Council Member Bird, I will try to answer the first question first. I was mistaken. Looking at the blue -- the blue was Overland Road. The black is the canal. It's kind of a bluish gray right next to it. That's the canal that meanders there on that boundary. Bird: That's what I thought. Lakey: And, Council Member Bird, to take water out of that canal you got to have water rights and someone to do that. I don't believe us as leasers have the ability to do that. I would defer to Mr. Russell, but we are getting our water from a particular location and applying it to the property. But there is not a well to provide that sprinkler system. So, we can handle it via a sprayer, just have to do it often enough to make sure it's effective. Council Member Bird, as far as bringing some material on site, I think -- if I can visit just briefly with my client I want to -- Council Member Bird, there has been the occasional load -- a small amount that has come in there from off site. If there is material that's not appropriate to be located in there we ask those individuals to correct that or we correct it ourselves. So, it's not something that stays in the property. Bird: Follow up, Mr. President. Todd, what -- how close were you to the elevation that we are supposed to be at when you're finished with your mining? Do you have any idea? Lakey: I might defer to Mr. Russell on that. I -- Bird: Why don't you bring him up. Lakey: Okay. Russell: To address your question, in the areas that we have housed the mining operation there are some areas where we are potentially maybe five or six feet above that final grade, some areas are 15 feet. I would say half the site is probably within a foot. So, there is a lot of areas that are close to the finish grade, but some areas are still getting work currently. Bird: So, we are not going to have to bring in a bunch of fill and stuff? Russell: No. Bird: Other than topsoil when they get ready to finish it. Russell: Yeah. There will not be a need for fill on this site. We will have excess material that we never got to mine. Bird: And how -- you're not doing any mining or anything right now, so -- and I realize that supply and demand is taking care of those piles. Are we going to be -- November 1 st have those piles gone or -- Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 28 of 42 Russell: Let me clarify that supply and demand is not taking care of those piles, but we will commit to having those piles off of this site by November 1 st, whatever it costs us. Bird: That's what I'm saying, you're depending on supply and demand right now. Russell: Yes. Bird: And you're not getting it. Russell: We are actually right on track. If you take the amount of time that's elapsed from the six month extension we are -- we have removed 35 percent of the remaining material in 33 percent of the time. So, we are just ahead of schedule. Bird: Okay. But by November 1st it will be gone? Russell: Yes, sir. Bird: Thank you Milam: Mr. President? Mr. Lakey, this question is probably going to have to get Mr. Russell back up here, but there is an obvious discrepancy in the watering that's happening. Some people say it's getting watered and most of the neighbors are saying it's not getting watered. I would like to know how often it's getting watered. Russell: So, there has been a water truck on site continuously for the entire operation. On days where we have a lot of activity -- in some cases we have two water trucks on site. If you go out there and look on the site at any given moment you may not see a water truck there, because it's running down the street to refill its tank. That's the only time it's not physically on the site. Milam: And are they watering all around? Based on the pictures that I saw there is an extreme amount of dust and the piles look pretty dry. So, I mean outside and the inside and the roads -- Russell: The majority of the time the focus of our dust control is the haul road itself or where the loader is operating, because that's what kicks up the dust. And we have had some traumatic windstorms here this spring and a lot of those photos you're seeing are on heavy wind events and I'm not going to sit here and deny the fact that when it blows 50 miles an hour we are going to get some dust off that site. And, you know, we do our best to control that as we can. At that point we just shut down and try not to disturb anything, because the more we disturb the more dust it kicks up. Milam: But if you had -- but watered the stockpiles, then, maybe that wouldn't be an issue. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 29 of 42 Russell: No. At that point that's -- water on the stockpiles with that high of wind probably is not going to help anything. Milam: Okay. Thank you. Mr. President, I have another question. If you're having such a hard time getting rid of what you have already mined why are you bringing in material from somewhere else? Russell: Well, to answer that question we have been plugging along for three years with the expectation that this is a market driven activity. We got zero opposition in the first extension and so we just assumed that, hey, listen, we are going to be close or we are going to come back in and ask for 18 more months and that's going to be the final request and we will have everything done. So, we were kind of plugging along with the expectation that with no opposition we would get an extension. Milam: I was under the impression that this material has been brought in since the decision from Planning and Zoning. Russell: If material has been brought in it's been -- it's been from somebody that did it without permission and in a lot of cases we have loaded it back up and sent it off -- Rountree: Folks, please. Russell: You saw a pile of rock in some of those pictures. I mean I can specifically speak to that event. One of our truck drivers brought it back, piled it there. Of course we are going to have to load that up and haul it off the site. So, we have a lot of people coming in and out of that site and mistakes happen sometimes. But we would rectify anything that's put in there, especially with debris. Milam: Thank you. Bird: Mr. President? Rountree: Mr. Bird. Bird: Mr. Russell, on the watering of the stockpiles you have got a -- you have got a pumper out there that you're spraying up on the -- able to get up on top of the piles and stuff? Russell: Yes. So, imagine like a fire nozzle on the -- Bird: That's what I mean. Russell: They can shoot up high. Bird: Okay. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 30 of 42 Russell: And so the intent with the water on the pile is if you water that enough and with natural rains it creates a crust on that stockpile, so as long as we are not disturbing that stockpile it does it does a pretty good job of controlling the dust when we get wind storms. So, we you know, what we are trying to do is very minimally disturb that pile as we load out and so that natural crust protects from dust coming off the site. A lot of those pictures you saw were right after that pile had been put there and it had not had the time yet to form that crust and protect us from the dust. Bird: Thank you. Rountree: Further questions? Thank you. Lakey: Thank you, Mr. President. Rountree: Discussion? Bird: Mr. President? Rountree: Mr. Bird. Bird: Sonya, as I understand they are going to have everything -- all the basic mining and stuff done and off site by November 1st, then, they want to wait until -- or get through October to get the reclamation doing -- done; is that not right? Is that what the extension is for? Watters: Councilman Bird, Councilmen, the November 1 st deadline was to remove the existing stockpiles and reclaim the site. Bird: Reclaim it? Watters: Yeah. They wanted the additional time until June 1st of 2015 to grade the site. Bird: June 1 st. Okay. And that's what the appeal is for is -- Watters: Yes. For that extended period of time. That's a portion of the appeal. Bird: There would be nothing but just reclamation of the -- getting it back. Watters: It would just be grading the site after the reclamation was done and that's just minimal slope stabilization per the state's bureau of reclamation's requirements. Bird: Follow up? Rountree: Mr. Bird. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 31 of 42 Bird: And, Sonya, do we have -- seeing how we don't have a preliminary plat, do we have any idea what kind of work this is going to entail? Watters: Councilman Bird, Councilmen, we do have a grading plan that was approved with this conditional use permit that was based on that development plan with that preliminary plat that was in existence at that time. Bird: But that was not -- that was with a different owner of that -- of the property at the time. Watters: It was. Bird: Now we got a new owner. Watters: That is correct. Bird: Okay. Thank you very much, Sonya. Milam: Mr. President. I don't know who this question is for, maybe Sonya. So, at the decision of the Planning and Zoning one of the issues that's also come up tonight was whether or not the grading was going to be part of the reclamation. Was it -- given the impression that they were all one thing or was there all along two separate activities? Watters: Council Woman Milam, Councilmen, since the original conditional use permit, the applicant represented in their application that they would have their mining, their reclamation, and their grading, separate items, done within -- they said at the time it would probably take three years to get done. It's always been separate. Staff has always included it separately also and with the last Commission's action it was also separate. It was intended for everything to be done on the site by November 1 st. Six months. Milam: Thank you. Zaremba: Mr. President? Rountree: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: Somebody mentioned that there is a change of ownership in amongst all of this. It's my understanding that CUPs and plats and other conditions run with the land and it doesn't make any difference who owns them. Am I mistaken in that or is that true? Watters: Council Zaremba, Councilmen, that is correct. They do run with the land. Zaremba: Okay. So, what we are talking about here is even though the applicant now is trying to separate grading from all the rest of it, the original conditions, whether it's the Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 32 of 42 current owner or not -- which clearly included the grading in what needed to be completed, were agreed to and if it changed hands the new owner should have or could have known that those were part of the condition and I mean to me it's a little misguiding to say that they are not the same thing. Whether or not there is a distinction in the law, the original conditions required all of those things to be done and completed on a certain date. Now, that date has been extended once and again and, finally, to a final time, which the applicant is appealing to extend again. I guess the struggle I have -- if I was a neighbor of this how long would I put up with it? I have a struggle with it going on this long. I think it needs to come to a conclusion. Every application that comes before us I consider the same thing, whether I would like to have it in my neighborhood. This is one that I certainly would not like to have in my neighborhood and I think the neighbors have been very patient. I don't think when we enabled mining in -- in a residential district we envisioned it turning into a commercial profitable operation. There was a purpose for it at the time which was to expedite the Ten Mile interchange and Ten Mile roadway north and south of the interchange, which would have been to the benefit of all the citizens and even to the neighbors of this. I think what we have here is an example of what can go wrong when you have good intentions. I am accepting of the fact that things have gone wrong and I believe this needs to be concluded as quickly as possible and it would be my inclination to deny the appeal and uphold the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission. When it's appropriate I would make a motion to that effect subject to other discussion. Milam: Mr. President, do we need to close the public hearing? Rountree: If you have got more questions or discussion -- Zaremba: We are still talking, but before I make a motion. Rountree: -- we will keep it open until you run down. Cavener: Mr. President? Rountree: Luke. Cavener: Councilman Zaremba is much more eloquent in his words than I think I could ever be. But I think it's important to add that I -- I appreciate having this process -- this opportunity tonight to hear from the applicant from their point of view and the effort that they have tried to make to be a good neighbor. On the flip side I think we see here tonight from those in attendance that there are many people in this neighborhood that have been very patient and have been very good neighbors and from what I have heard tonight is their patience has run out and their willingness to be good neighbors has run out. I believe that our Planning and Zoning Commission, for very specific reasons, and the reason that you were before them in April was to address this issue. Again, I agree with Councilman Zaremba, I would not want this development in my backyard, I would not want it in my neighborhood. I think almost all of those in attendance feel the exact Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 33 of 42 same way. So, I would -- I would lean towards agreeing with Councilman Zaremba that I would be -- be willing to deny this. Rountree: Any comments, further questions? Bird: I have none. If we are done we can close the public hearing. Zaremba: Mr. President? Rountree: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: I move we close the public hearing on AP 14-001. Milam: Second. Rountree: It's been moved and seconded to close the public hearing. All those in favor signify by aye. Anybody opposed? MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Zaremba: Mr. President? Rountree: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: I move that we deny the appeal represented by AP 14-001 and by that denial it means that the provisions of the CUP as passed by the Planning and Zoning Commission stand as given by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Milam: Mr. President? Mr. Zaremba, I -- I would recommend maybe a slight change. Bird: Second it first. Milam: Would be if -- if moving the scales doesn't alleviate any traffic from bothering the neighbors I don't know that that would be a necessary expense for the applicant. On the other hand also would -- I would like to see more specific watering schedule, as opposed to when necessary. When necessary is just too vague for me. Zaremba: Mr. President? Rountree: Mr. Zaremba, I have a motion and I'm looking for a second before we do the discussion. Cavener: I will second. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 34 of 42 Rountree: It's been moved and seconded on the motion. Now we have had a little premature discussion, but that's just fine. That's all right. So, the maker of the motion has heard the -- Zaremba: The maker of the motion could agree, but I don't see a gain -- or the ultimate objective is not necessarily served by moving the scales and I guess the question I asked earlier is similar to that. The truck traffic is going to follow the same path regardless of where the scales are and apparently that's a factor of having the trucks not back up. So, the maker of the motion would be happy to make that one change to the Planning and Zoning Commission's conditions, that the scales do not need to be moved. As for defining a more specific watering plan, we already have ordinances that require dust and blowing abatement. DEQ also has state ordinances and I -- I think maybe we need to bring this more the DEQ's attention, but I would be more inclined to leave it at that. So, I probably wouldn't add that piece to the motion. Rountree: So, does the second agree with the amendment to add the -- Cavener: Yeah, I will agree to it. Zaremba: To not move the scale. Rountree: Not move the scale. Cavener: Second agrees. Rountree: Any further discussion on the amended motion? Okay. It's been moved and seconded— Zaremba: Mr. President. Actually, I would clarify. We are talking about the reclamation, including the grading and finishing the site, which was the original agreement, and not making that a separate issue that could go on forever. It needs to be concluded November 1st as well. That's the clarification. Cavener: Second agrees. Rountree: Second understood that. It's been moved and seconded as stated by Mr. Zaremba. Roll call vote, please. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, absent; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Rountree: Thank you. Thank you all. And you don't have to stay for the rest of the meeting, but you're welcome if you wish. Let's take a short break here, so we can have a little noise control. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 35 of 42 (Recess: 8:35 p.m. to 8:45 p.m.) Item 8: Department Reports A. Mayor's Office: City Survey Acceptance Rountree: I'm going to call us back to order. Items -- the department reports from the Mayor's office and I'm just going to have Robert stand up here. We will let Mark wait until the end. He's got all but one of these department reports I believe, so why don't you just -- Simison: All right. Rountree: -- run all through them. Simison: All right. Council President, Members of the Council, I'm hear today -- you heard a report two weeks ago on the city survey. You should have received a copy in your box and a report for your review. If you have any comments I'm happy to take them. Otherwise, we can take a motion to accept the city survey, get it posted up on the city website and use the information that we received -- Rountree: Is your mike on? Simison: It should be. Sorry. Rountree: Get a little closer. Simison: Okay. Sorry. So, if we have a motion to accept the city survey we can use that and put it into the city's strategic planning process and notify the citizens of and put it on the website. I will stand for any questions or comments. Rountree: Any questions for Robert? Bird: I have -- I haven't had a chance to look through it that much, but let's get the proposal out and get people looking at it. B. Mayor's Office: Resolution No. 14-997: Adopting 2014 Meridian Citizens Survey Results Rountree: That brings us to Item B, which would be the resolution number accepting the -- Bird: Mr. President. I move we approve Resolution 14-997. Cavener: Second. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 36 of 42 Rountree: It's been moved and seconded to approve that particular resolution. Roll call vote. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, absent; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. D. Arts Commission: Budget Amendment for Spending Authority for Concerts on Broadway for the Not -to -Exceed Amount of $15,000.00 Rountree: And Item D. Arts Commission. Simison: Arts Commission. What you have before you is a budget amendment for spending authority for the Meridian Arts Commission for monies they raised for their Concerts On Broadway. Happy to answer any questions. Rountree: Any questions? Bird: Mr. Chair? Rountree: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we approve the budget amendment for spending authority for Concert On Broadway in an amount not to exceed 15,000 dollars. Cavener: Second. Rountree: It's been moved and seconded to approve Item D. Roll call. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, absent; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. E. Mayor's Office: Mayor's Youth Advisory Council Budget Amendment Request and Spending Authority for Ball at the Hall for the Not -to -Exceed Amount of $2,275.00 Rountree: Item E. Simison: I don't have the -- which one is that, the -- Rountree: That's the Youth Advisory Council budget. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 37 of 42 Simison: The budget amendment you have in front of you is a budget amendment for the youth council. Again, it's funds that they have raised through their Ball at the Hall that will be used to pay their expenses and Buckle Up For Bobby. Be happy to answer any questions. Rountree: No questions? Bird: Mr. President? Rountree: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we approve the budget amendment for 2,275 dollars for the MYAC Ball at the Hall. Milam: Second. Rountree: It's been moved and seconded to approve Item 8-E. Roll call. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, absent; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. F. Mayor's Office: Budget Amendment for Special Projects for a Not -to -Exceed Amount of $60,000.00 Rountree: Item 8-F. Simison: We have a budget amendment in front of you for a special project for professional services for other government that we would like to get started on for this year. It will also be carried forward and it will be brought forward later in this year for the rest of fiscal year '15 or for fiscal year '15 as well. I would be happy to stand for any questions. Rountree: Questions? A motion? Bird: Mr. President? Rountree: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we approve the budget amendment for special projects not to exceed 60,000 dollars. Milam: Second. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 38 of 42 Rountree: It's been moved and seconded to approve Item 8-F. Roll call. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, absent; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. G. Legal Department: Recipient Agreement Between City of Meridian and Meridian Boys & Girls Club for Contribution of Fiscal Year 2014 Funds not to exceed $500,000.00 Rountree: Item 8-G. Simison: Bill, is this you? Nary: Yes. Rountree: Oh. is that Bill? Nary: Yes. Mr. President, Members of the Council, the next item is a -- in your packet is a recipient agreement with the Boys and Girls Club of Ada County. This is in exchange for the city's participation of partnership with them on a gym facility here in the City of Meridian. We have researched that. It does fit the public purpose doctrine in the state of Idaho that allows for this type of participation and partnership. In the agreement itself it indicates a couple of conditions that are required first. Of course, they have to build a gym. They couldn't use it for any other purpose than what the city is providing the funds for and, secondarily, it has to be completed by the end of 2015. So, as long as those two conditions are met -- if it isn't done by the end of 2015, unless extended by the Council, then, they would have to reimburse the city for the funds. But that should be on their schedule. Everything is fine. It's signed by their executive director, so it's ready to move forward. Rountree: Questions for Bill? Do I have a motion? Bird: Mr. President? Rountree: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move that we approve the agreement budget amendment for the donation to the Boys and Girls Club not to exceed 500,000. Milam: Second. Rountree: It's been moved and seconded to approve Item 8-G. Roll call vote. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 39 of 42 Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, absent; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Bird: Mr. President, before we go any farther -- this agreement is basically the same thing that we have with the senior center every year, am I not right? Nary: Yes, sir, it is. Bird: Okay. H. Legal Department: Budget Amendment for a Donation to the Boys and Girls Club for a Not -to -Exceed Amount of $500,000 Rountree: And, Bill, are you going to do H as well? Nary: Yes. Mr. President, Members of the Council, in your packet is a budget amendment for basically this partnership donation for up to -- for not to exceed 500,000 dollars out of the ending fund balance. Zaremba: Mr. President? Rountree: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: Mr. Nary, would you refresh my memory? I recall somewhere in there somebody said that this donation enables matching gifts from other people? Did I get that right? Is that true? Nary: Mr. President, Members of the Council, Council Member Zaremba, I believe that is part of their capital campaign that they are going through that having some significant community partners has also -- will also prompt other community partners who have indicated they would be willing to participate if they were to see there was enough community support. So, I believe that was part of the Boys and Girls Club campaign is how to do that. I think they have had a number of other community business people that have offered to assist, but they were waiting to see that there really was community support for this project. Zaremba: So, if I'm interpreting that correctly, this donation at least enables them to have a multiplier effect on it of some sort. Nary: Yes, sir. I think that was the way they proposed it. Yes. Zaremba: Good. Thank you. Rountree: Any discussion? Do I have a motion? Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 40 of 42 Milam: Mr. President? I move that we approve a budget amendment for donation to the Boys and Girls Club for a not to exceed amount of 500,00 dollars. Zaremba: Second. Rountree: It's been moved and seconded to approve Item 8-H. Roll call vote. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, absent; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. C. Fire Department: Budget Amendment for Public Education Prevention for the Not -to -Exceed Amount of $17,602.00 Rountree: Back to Item C. Mark. Niemeyer: Mr. President, Members of the Council, this is an annual event for us. I can happily report that Stacy put a smiley face on this one, so knowing how funds are with amendments. This is a request to expend funds that are donated to our department specifically to Pam Orr and the public education programs. This year we received 5,992 dollars from the Light My Fire. We received 110 dollars in citizen donations, a thousand dollars from the Idaho Fire Chiefs Association and 10,500 dollars through Idaho AAP, which is through St. Luke's to fund car seats and the education of car seats. So, the request is for 17,602 dollars. It's no expense to the city, there are all donated funds specifically for public education and a big chunk of that is the car seat inspection program and also the car seat replacement program. So, just a word on that. When we have expecting parents come in we provide a car seat inspection for them. We show them how to install it properly, so that it is done right. Sometimes we find that those car seats are so old they no longer meet a safety standard and so through donations like this we can actually provide them with a car seat that does meet the safety standards. This is not a cost to the city, this is all through donations. So, it's a great service. St. Luke's had this money to give to a department. This is a Treasure Valley wide initiative, the car seat program. They chose our department because Pam has been so active with St. Luke's in this car seat inspection program. Rountree: Questions? Bird: Mr. President? Rountree: Mr. Bird. Bird: Madam Clerk, on the budget amendment do you have the signatures of the liaison, finance director, and the Mayor? All I have got is the -- I think it's Mark's signature. He must be a doctor. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 41 of 42 Holman: Council Member Bird, Members of the Council, I don't. I don't have an original budget amendment, I only have the one with the director's signature. Niemeyer: That was signed and forwarded. Bird: It is signed completely? Okay. Rountree: You signed it? Milam: I did. Bird: You signed it? Okay. Niemeyer: And Stacy knew about it, so I'm assuming it hit her office as well. I can follow up on that tomorrow. Bird: We will make the liaison follow up. Milam: Mr. President. I move that we approve a budget amendment for public education prevention for the fire department, not to exceed the amount of 17,602 dollars. Cavener: Second. Bird: Second. Rountree: It's been moved and seconded to approve the budget amendment for fire prevention and safety. Roll call. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, absent; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Rountree: That concludes our activities for the evening. If there is any wants or desires for future topics, that's our next item. Bird: I have none. Rountree: I don't see anymore than normal, so I'd entertain a motion to adjourn. Bird: So moved. Zaremba: Second. Meridian City Council June 24, 2014 Page 42 of 42 Rountree: It's been moved and seconded to adjourn. All those in favor? Anybody opposed? I'm sure. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:00 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) �.Gu/.�i� i 15 i X014 DA E APPROVED Changes to Agenda: None Item VA: Southridge Gravel Mining (AP -14.001) Application(s): ➢ City Council Review of the Commission's Decision on MCU -14-001 Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 76 acres of land currently zoned R-2, R-4, and R-8, located south of W. Overland Road & east of S. Ten Mile Road, west of the Ridenbaugh Canal. History: • This property was annexed into the City in 2006 and was included in the preliminary plat for Southridge Subdivision. • A CUP was approved on February 3, 2011 for construction sand & gravel mining and crushing of material on the site for the purpose of mass grading the property for the development of a residential subdivision. The applicant requested 3 years in which to complete the grading, crushing and removal of material necessary to prepare the site for a residential development and reclaim the site. Because of the proximity of residential properties in relation to the project site and potential impacts from the proposed use, the Commission approved a lesser period of 18 months with the understanding that a modification to the CUP could be requested to extend the time if needed. The permit expired on August 3, 2012. • In July of 2012, a request for a modification to the CUP was submitted for an 18 month extension of the use. Because no one testified at the hearing or submitted written testimony in opposition, the Commission approved the request to allow the operation to continue for an additional 18 months until April 4, 2014. At such time, the site was required to be graded per the reclamation plan; or, a modification to the CUP could be requested to extend the use. • Prior to expiration of the previous CUP, the applicant requested a final 18 month extension to remove the processed material from the site & reclaim the site, 60 days of which to mine & crush additional material. The Commission approved the CUP w/conditions that allowed an additional maximum period of 6 months (until November 1, 2014) in which to complete reclamation of the site, including grading of the site and hauling off existing stockpiles & removal of all equipment. • The preliminary plat expired on December 22, 2013. Summary of Request: The applicant is requesting City Council review of the Commission's decision on the most recently approved CUP (MCU -14-001) with modifications as stated in their letter. See Applicant's letter for more info. Written Testimony: Memo from Staff; Glen Hickey; Dick & Susan Bagley; Ryan Brewer; Jerry Ross; Joe & Patsy Kendall; Maureen Brewer; Lynne Reiber; Bob Marsland; Nadine Marsland; Keith & Dianne Ebeling; William & Phyllis Weiss; Robert & Susan Carlson; and Tony Martarano. Notes: Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 24. 2014 ITEM TITLE: Oaks South ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: FP 14-025 Final Plat approval consisting of 42 single family residential lots & 9 common lots on 16.83 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district by Coleman Homes, LLC - s/side of W. McMillan Road between N. McDermott Road and N. Black Cat Road MEETING NOTES V Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 24, 2014 ITEM TITLE: Bienville Square No 3 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: FP 14-024 Final Plat approval consisting of 40 single family residential lots and 4 common/other lots on 5.27 acres of land in the R-15 zoning district by Centre Point Square LLC - west of N. Eagle Road and south of E. Ustick Road MEETING NOTES I Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 24, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: FP 14-026 ITEM TITLE: Southern Highlands Final Plat approval consisting of 47 building lots and 6 common lots on 27.66 acres of land in an R-4 zoning district by BHH Investments 1, LLC MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 24, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: 5D PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Rail -with -Trail Arterial Crossing Design Study Contract Between Project Engineering Consultants, the Idaho Transportation Department and the City of Meridian for a Not -to -Exceed Amount of $81,523.00 MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 24, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Well Lot Lease with Mission Coast Properties as Lessor for a Well Lot Site at Reflection Ridge No. 3 MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Christopher ADA COUNTY RECORDER D.Rich AMOUNT .00 12 BOISE IDAHO 06/27/14 09:30 AM DEPUTY Bonnie Oberbiilig RECORDED—REQUEST OF 114050780 Meridian City LEASE THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 1.8 day of June, 2014, by and between Mission Coast Properties ID Inc., and hereinafter referred to as the "Lessor," and THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, hereinafter referred to as the "Lessee." WITNESSETH: That the said Lessor, for and in consideration of the benefits, covenants and agreements hereinafter mentioned on the part and behalf of the said Lessee to be paid, kept and performed,does by these presents grant,demise and lease unto the said Lessee, and the said Lessee does by these presents hire,rent and take from the said Lessor,that certain real property located on the following described real property,to wit: See Exhibits"A"and"B"(map of site&legal description)attached hereto and, by this reference, incorporated herein as if set forth in full. (the "Leased Premises") TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said premises,together with the appurtenances, privileges, rights and easements thereto belonging, unto the said Lessee for the term of ten (10)years,said term to commence on July 1, 2014 and terminate on June 30, 2024, (the"Initial Lease Period")for the rental and upon the terms and conditions as follows: 1. RENTAL: Lessor and Lessee hereby waive monetary rent and agree that the mutual benefits provided herein constitute adequate consideration for this agreement. The mutual benefits include but Well Lease Agreement frm update June 2014.doc LEASE- 1 are not limited to Lessee's ability to begin drilling a well in advance of platting and Lessor having the benefit of water service sooner that would otherwise be available. 2. USE OF PREMISES: Lessee covenants and agrees that the Leased Premises shall be used for a water well site, including pumping station and the construction thereof,and shall not be used for any other purpose or purposes without the prior written consent of Lessor. 3. MAINTENANCE:The Leased Premises is bare ground. Lessee shall,at Lesee's sole cost and expense agrees to maintain the Leased Premises in as good condition as the same is in at the time Lessee shall take possession of the Leased Premises, reasonable wear, tear and damage by the elements excepted and at the termination of this Lease in any manner, Lessee shall surrender said premises to Lessor in such condition. 4. ALTERATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS: Lessee shall have the right to make alterations and improvements to the Leased Premises by the construction of a municipal water well thereon and the addition of such other improvements consistent with municipal purposes. Lessee shall maintain all such alterations and improvements made by Lessee. Upon the termination of this Lease,such improvements as shall have been added or made by Lessee shall not revert to the Lessor,and shall not become a part of the Leased Premises so leased herein. Lessee's construction of said municipal water well and other improvements shall comply with all Covenants Conditions and Restrictions(CC&Rs)and all design guildines applicable to the Leased Premises. Prior to construction, Lesee shall obtain design approval from the subdivision architectural control committee utilizing the procedure set forth in the CC&Rs,which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Well Lease Agreement frm update June 2014.doc LEASE-2 5. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW: Lessee agrees to comply with all municipal, state and federal laws, rules, regulations and ordinances and to do all things necessary to stay in compliance with the same. 6. UTILITIES: It is expressly agreed that during the full term of this Lease, Lessee shall furnish and promptly pay for any utilities required for the Leased Premises and improvements at Lessee's own cost and expense. 7. TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS: Lessee shall pay all real estate taxes and assessments of any kind levied against the above demised premises during the term of this Lease and any extension thereof promptly as the same become due. 8. ASSIGNMENT OR SUBLEASING: Lessee shall not assign this Lease nor sublet to any other lessee the said leased premises or any portion thereof, without the written consent first obtained of Lessor; provided, however, such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld by Lessor. 9. LABOR CONTRACTS AND EMPLOYEES: The parties expressly covenant and agree that all labor contracts and employment agreements with employees providing services to or construction upon the Leased Premises shall be made directly with Lessee and that all such employees shall be deemed solely the employees of Lessee and in no way employees of Lessor. Lessee covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Lessor of and from any liability for any acts of employees of Lessee or any acts of persons working for Lessee under a labor contract. 10. WASTE PROHIBITED: Lessee shall not commit any waste or damage to the premises hereby leased nor permit any waste or damage to be done thereto. 11. LIABILITY: Lessor shall not be liable for any injury or damage which may be sustained by any person or property of the Lessee or any other person or persons resulting from the condition Well Lease Agreement frm update June 2014.doc LEASE-3 of the Leased Premises or any part thereof,or from the street or subsurface,or from any other source or cause whatsoever, nor shall the Lessor be liable for any defect in the structures on said demised premises, latent or otherwise, and Lessee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Lessor from such liability. 12. LIABILITY INSURANCE: Lessee shall maintain a comprehensive liability insurance policy covering the above-demised premises during the term of this Lease with a responsible insurance company,all at the sole cost and expense of Lessee, in the names and for the benefit of Lessee and Lessor in the sum of$500,000.00 single-limit coverage. 13. FIRE AND EXTENDED COVERAGE INSURANCE: Lessee shall maintain fire and extended coverage on the improvements to the real property placed thereon by Lessee and Lessor shall be under no obligation to maintain any fire or extended coverage insurance thereon. 14. CONDEMNATION: If the entire premises, or a substantial part thereof, are condemned or taken by purchase in lieu thereof, then this Lease shall terminate as of the time possession is taken. 15. LESSOR'S RESTRICTIONS: Lessor further covenants and agrees that it will not construct,or allow to be constructed, any subsurface waste water or stormwater disposal facilities within 125 feet of the boundaries of the Leased Premises. 16. LEASE RENEWAL: Unless either party terminates this lease prior to the end of the Initial Lease Period,this lease shall automatically renew for additional one year terms. 17. DEFAULT AND FORFEITURE: Time and the strict and faithful performance of each and every one of the conditions of this Agreement are expressly made the essence of this Agreement. If default be made by the Lessee in payment of any part of Lessee's rent when the same shall become due, or Well Lease Agreement frm update June 2014.doc LEASE-4 default be made by the Lessee in keeping, performing or observing any of the covenants and agreements herein contained and such default shall remain so for a period of thirty(30)days after written notice shall have been sent by certified or registered mail to Lessee as hereinafter provided,then in such event the Lessor may, at Lessor's election,either in law or equity, seek specific performance of this Agreement or may declare said term and Lease forfeited and ended and re-enter the Leased Premises again to repossess and enjoy the same as in their first estate,and the effect of such default shall in itself,at the election of Lessor,without further notice or demand constitute a forfeiture and termination of this Lease, and if thereafter the Lessee shall fail to surrender possession of the Leased Premises to Lessor,the Lessee shall be deemed guilty of an unlawful and forcible detention of said premises. If Lessee shall abandon or vacate the Leased Premises,or if this Lease be terminated for breach of any of the covenants and agreements herein contained, Lessee hereby agrees to pay all reasonable expenses incurred by Lessor in obtaining possession of said premises from Lessee, including reasonable legal expenses and attorney's fees, and to pay such other expenses as the Lessor may incur in putting the Leased Premises in good order and condition as herein provided, and also to pay all other reasonable and necessary expenses or commissions paid by Lessor in re-leasing the Leased Premises. In the event of notification of default by Lessor to Lessee and Lessee does in fact cure such default,then and in that event Lessee shall pay, in addition to all arrearages as existing under the notice of default, the reasonable attorneys fees incurred by Lessor in determination of the default and the notification to the defaulting Lessee. 18. INDEMNIFICATION: During the term of this Lease (and thereafter, for incidents occurring during any term of this Lease)Lessee shall indemnify,defend and hold harmless Lessor against any and all claims, liabilities,damages,expenses(including reasonable attorney fees),judgments,proceedings and causes of action of any nature arising from: (i) injury to or death of any person, or damage to or loss of any property occurring on, in or around the Leased Premises, or (ii) growing out of connected with the use, Well Lease Agreement frm update June 2014.doc LEASE-5 condition or occupancy of the Leased Premises or(iii) losses resulting from a breach of thisp rovision of this agreement. This obligation to indemnify shall be limited to the acts or omissions of Lessee or its officers, contractors, licensees, agents, servants, employees, guests, invitees or visitor and not caused by the negligence or other wrongful act of omission of Lessor,or Lessor's officers,employees,or servants. Lessee's obligation to indemnify shall survive the satisfaction of this agreement. 19. (This paragraph intentionally left blank) 20. ATTORNEY'S FEES: In the event an action is brought to enforce any of the terms or provisions of this Lease, or enforce forfeiture thereof for default thereof by either of the parties hereto, the successful party to such action or collection shall be entitled to recover from the losing party a reasonable attorney's fee, together with such other costs as may be authorized by law. 21. NOTICES: All notices required to be given to each of the parties hereto under the terms of this Agreement shall be given by depositing a copy of such notice in the United States mail, postage prepaid and registered or certified, return receipt requested, to the respective parties hereto at the following address: Lessors: Mission Coast Properties ID Inc 13402— 13A Avenue, Surrey, BC V4A 1 C3 Lessee: City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 or to such other address as may be designated by writing delivered to the other party. All notices given by certified mail shall be deemed completed as of the date of mailing except as otherwise expressly provided herein. Well Lease Agreement frm update June 2014.doc LEASE-6 22. REPRESENTATIONS: It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that there are no verbal promises,implied promises,agreements,stipulations, representations or warranties of any character excepting those set forth in this Agreement. 23. BINDING EFFECT: The provisions and stipulations hereof shall inure to the benefit of and bind the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors in interest of the respective parties hereto. 24. SITUS: This Lease is established and accepted by the Lessee under the laws of the State of Idaho, and all questions concerning its validity, construction and administration shall be determined under such laws. 25. HEADINGS: The bolded paragraph headings are for convenience only and are not a part of this Lease agreement and shall not be used in interpreting or construing this Lease agreement. 26. SEVERABILITY: If any portion or portions of this Lease shall be, for any reason, invalid or unenforceable,the remaining portion or portions shall nevertheless be valid,enforceable and carried into effect, unless to do so would clearly violate the present legal and valid intentions of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Lessor and Lessee do execute this Lease Agreement the day and year first above written. "Lessors" Missio ►•: Prope - D I -. BY: Lem: it uthie, ' -sident 1111, Well Lease Agreement frm update June 2014.doc LEASE-7 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada, On this /04. day ofSCV1—e-- 2014, before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Lorne Duthie,known or identified to me to be the President of Mission Coast Properties, ID, Inc.and who executed the instrument,and acknowledged to me that Mission Coast Properties, ID, Inc. executed the same. Lot (SEAL) • .ip rotary z NOTARY PUBLIC OR IDAHO " = RESIDING AT: idiel--ev : 0 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:5'7p-20P) Otsat• e of 1d,-•�1 IIIgl t11t1��� "Lessee" CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO , By: 4-,6- n • ivtaYor aok,,,A6j P r , '1,1 T / ��2.A.DTA A29 A.. �` ' st ._ __ �„■ 4 -was OA City Clerk• "Lessee" STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada. On this 04 day of ,2014,before me,the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Tammy de Weerd and Jaycee Holman., known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk of the CITY of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Well Lease Agreement frm update June 2014.doc LEASE-8 .. ONe• ..., 4_._,...6,% ♦�►e &ay • •,,„,,,, .„ O. ♦ • c 1111.110 1�16 1 • � err �...-�' *Ca i • \�/ ��r�� - (5jZ :0: NO"IA'Y PUBLIC'•R IDAHO ' ��%'(,)14'. RESIDING N AT: . vov I.(. . RES D G �d --,.. „, .0!„' MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: ickrt Li , E 0 4 0 •�•S`!'A''I'EO•• ••...•• Well Lease Agreement frm update June 2014.doc LEASE-9 17113 T'[3 ENGINEERS CONSULTING ENGINEERS,SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 332 N.BROADMORE WAY SUITE 101 NAMPA,IDAHO 83687 208-442-6300•FAX 208-466-0944 illierv<z)" ...irmr& -),Pirdo IP- 'Iv, Project: 140008 / 'r'. 96o c:t!r Date: Aril 28 2014 Page: 1 of 2 �4rE0E‘101"), . P E�a stir �1 ti EXHIBIT "A Proposed Reflection Ridge Subdivision No. City of Meridian Domestic Well Parcel This Parcel is situated in a portion of the S.W. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 and the N.W. 'A of the S.E. 1/4 of Section 30, Township 3 North, Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the southwest corner of said S.W. '/ of the N.E. 'A;thence along the south boundary of said S.W. 1 of the N.E. 1/4, A) N.89°43'54"E.,451.28 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;thence leaving said south boundary, B) N.00°00'00"E., 7.83 feet; thence, 1) N.89°00'35"E., 121.35 feet to a non-tangent point of curvature on the proposed westerly right-of-way of N. Shimmering Way; thence along said proposed right-of- way and a curve to the right, 2) Having an arc length of 58.62 feet, a radius of 169.00 feet, through a central angle of 19°52'29" and a long chord which bears S.12°04'39"E., 58.33 feet to a point of tangency; thence continuing along said proposed right-of-way, 3) S.02°08'25"E., 45.31 feet to a tangent point of curvature on the westerly right-of-way of S. Shimmering Way and the northerly boundary of Reflection Ridge Subdivision No. 1, on file in Book 106, Pages 14563 through 14569, records of Ada County; thence along said northerly boundary and a curve to the right, 4) Having an arc length of 31.42 feet,a radius of 20.00 feet,through a central angle of 90°00'00" and a long chord which bears S.42°51'3 5"W., 28.28 feet to a point of tangency on the northerly right-of-way of E. Radiant Ridge Drive and the westerly boundary of said Reflection Ridge No. 1; thence leaving said westerly boundary and along the proposed northerly right-of-way of West Radiant Ridge Drive, 5) S.57°55'46"W.116.07 feet; thence leaving said proposed northerly Right-of-way, BOISE• COEUR d'ALENE•NAMPA L:11400081Survey Descriptions 0428l4.doc Project: 140008 Date: April 28,2014 Page: 2 of 2 6) N.00°00'00"E., 117.31 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 16,287 square feet,more or less. is ,t1 LA i1,`ri, /I :,4 - --.• ik Nik.Fir 4:ttipstv,,,i ,,t /kW: e :fi Bi...) . 4 fr OPi a,-a 4 r , . .44,7„,oF 0. %), lzaRost BOISE • COEUR d'ALENE •NAMPA L:\1400081Survey Descriptions 042814.doc Ci w m o...i 71t) / / / \ /? / 04/X\ linw c) Q W cf) cc.3 wccw a Ct a //I co 0 AS, Pi / ts,jcv Pr.4 2 Q irii Li_ .izi ,th LIJ \, W / / • / / Q t...4 i ,,e.,' Zi Si \ 0 {. CQ ;•-r CD LO < 7 _,,,, qo ir.1 rill 2 ° cc) '".--1 ......j..1 2 a . Ld 0 n / . § _I Z c.) r r .., W < 1 LI, 12:) d / / 1 \(4). I .,..4 ..,. 0 ce -g03 .0 <I / / L---.1— — 1.... Z a. u?N C+7 Z ,AS.A.----.._ Ca • 1 //,'-g. #14/ / \\\\ F)"^r, ; i fs________I , _#,.. 3.gzso.zos ONDIMAINIIIS 'S di _ z „, a./ aik, .3 .--0 ,I.Vgt a- 0) / 44‘,/ , . . / La 1 N, 7----: i c,„ / AO- It) ! 0 44 + _. . , .4,10 -#14 n P gi, . p 0V 8 '- 6 Ili o w w E i- + di ,sch - ZCO OD 1 / 'C;(i' /\\ 41.2*L.1.1 1 i co 34,00,00.00N r g / / // Lrie) Z l') PI 8 / "ti4 !ZD Cq 6 2 8 z 5 8 / / 1 za./..%4 ..,...., as Csi 1,, m b 2 a3iiI Z .-4 v)- (i4 g / rzi o i 1 Pzi ...., = X\ i W MI 1 c741 al 1 ________I Si� 1 Cli a s 8 ..4 .: U §: wi �' i w ...I 1 r wa 1 i Z z in ' C° CNI ri) •.......----- . , 1...4 CO CD b co get ce 14 .'4 I . b),' CI 1 ILI la in VP . r.4 E-. Cn 00 -2 .zr \ (s)' .4 0 1 ' /ji/Z I‘........, iu 3 u$ \ 2 ow Pal Q I > aLT, /( tg g..: a4 z _ [44 rzlI_______ a 8 o .1 / Lir .(ki 0 ..-.L ,e4 40, 4.f° , 0 t.:17 2La .,E0 Z E Ow (A614 42, te ,49. ai 14 i 1 CC ° I'm Id a' d EN- W w 've.4.0'1 Z is a w I it, 1 0 -c4 1,1 r g atl U ;al i.j 4+ a 4< I 1 MM■Kc.,14 fa, ..c La.U .- 1c, '0 = .1 0 :"-.# cx La a: • i ce (ct 4-. mi sa X i.1.4 ›, i-, mE-2 W i W w 6 4 BowQ "�g� �w � � m acs ,TIT$ riarA: 4,. CD•. ,,,t. .............,.. . ..-6- C4 C U 4;40 N W x La 14 0 4 I, § 71: ao' H t Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 24, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: 5F PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION NO. 14-996A Resolution No. 14-996A: A Resolution Approving The Transfer Of The Assets And Liabilities Of The Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District, Ada County, Idaho, To The City Of Meridian, Idaho, Pursuant To The "Agreement For The Dissolution And Transfer Of Assets And Liabilities From Meridian Heights Water And Sewer District To The City Of Meridian; Settlement Agreement And Release MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. 14-996A BIRD, BORTON, CAVENER, MILAM, ROUNTREE, ZAREMBA A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF THE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF THE MERIDIAN HEIGHTS WATER & SEWER DISTRICT, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, PURSUANT TO THE "AGREEMENT FOR THE DISSOLUTION AND TRANSFER OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES FROM MERIDIAN HEIGHTS WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE." WHEREAS, the City of Meridian seeks to accept the transfer of assets and liabilities from the Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District, pursuant to the "Agreement for the Dissolution and Transfer of Assets and Liabilities From Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District to the City of Meridian; Settlement Agreement and Release" as of December 19, 2014; WHEREAS, the City of Meridian finds that each of the following conditions exist, pursuant to Idaho Code § 42-3239; WHEREAS, the City of Meridian is capable of providing all of the essential functions provided by the Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District; WHEREAS, the City of Meridian has agreed to assume and perform the essential functions of the Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District, pursuant to the "Agreement for the Dissolution and Transfer of Assets and Liabilities From Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District to the City of Meridian; Settlement Agreement and Release" as of December 19, 2014; WHEREAS, the City of Meridian either has acquired, or is acquiring, sufficient assets, infrastructure, and other resources to perforin the essential operations of the Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District; WHEREAS, the Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District has made provisions for the retirement, payment or assumption of any and all debt, bonds, and other liabilities and obligations of the district; WHEREAS, the Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District has made provisions for the liquidation and disbursement of district assets and infrastructure not intended to be transferred to the City of Meridian; WHEREAS, the Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District has published notice in a newspaper in general circulation in the district (the Idaho Statesman) for two consecutive weeks prior to the public hearing, including information on the petition for an election on the proposed transfer, pursuant to Idaho Code § 42- 3239(2); WHEREAS, on September 10, 2013, the Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District held a public hearing to receive public testimony on the proposed transfer, and after the public hearing authorized an election, pursuant to Idaho Code § 42-3239(3); and RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES FROM THE MERIDIAN HEIGHTS WATER & SEWER DISTRICT PAGE 1 OF 2 WHEREAS, on June 17, 2014, the Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District adopted a resolution finding that the conditions required by § 42-3239(1) exist, and approving the transfer of assets and liabilities to the City of Meridian; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That the City of Meridian finds that each of the above conditions exist. Section 2. That the City of Meridian approves the transfer of the assets and liabilities of the Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District, pursuant to the "Agreement for the Dissolution and Transfer of Assets and Liabilities From Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District to the City of Meridian; Settlement Agreement and Release" as of December 19, 2014. Section 3. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 24th day of June, 2014. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 24th day of June, 2014. APPROVED: Go¢o xq,SDAULI`rj9 ATTEST: 3 Ei�IDIAN owro aycee INICVLI i ZOU,vc 1 -1 �'o rR °gree ras nsoxs RESOLUTION APPROVING TRE TRANSFER OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES FROM THE MERIDIAN nEIGH'TS WATER & SEWER DISTRICT Clerk PACE 2 or 2 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 24. 2014 ITEM NUMBER: 6 PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Items Moved from Consent Agenda MEETING NOTES +Apj(\_ Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 24, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: 7A PROJECT NUMBER: AP 14-001 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: Southridge Gravel Mining Public Hearing: City Council review of the CUP modification (MCU 14-001) application by Idaho Sand & Gravel - s/o W. Overland Rd & e/o S. Ten Mile Rd MEETING NOTES r. Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Machelle Hill From: Sonya Watters Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 9:09 AM To: Holly Binkley; Jacy Jones; Jaycee Holman; Machelle Hill Cc: Glen Hickey (hickeyglen24@gmail.com) Subject: FW: IS&G Please include Mr. Hickey's email below in the public record (print pics & scan please). Thx!?{ 'cJ From: Glen Hickey [mailto:hickeyglen24@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 7:22 PM To: Matt Parsons; Sonya Watters Subject: Fwd: IS&G Matt, Sonya, 374, 421,and 475 clearly show mining of undisturbed unprocessed material. 476 shows the depth of the hole. The piles give you scale. The hole is deeper than the piles are tall. The 370 and 473 show the dumping of contaminated fill. GH I SAM 0374.JPG - Google Drive Page 1 of 1 SAM 0374.JP-G SIGNIN verslen of Inletet Eaprx whlcM1lnaupp. aroa may nol work m[Ity. Plena ae update your rorOaoole CM1 File E II No �Olaf,Olaf,l unsupported. Be hN tllur br l � i 10" https://docs.google.com/file/dlOB8fjj G80S 1 G-gR3 duWUoteTRTRDQ/edit?usp=drive web... 6/24/2014 SAM_0421.JPG - Google Drive Page 1 of 1 SAM-0421_JPG SIGHIN yy¢¢gI�"aI�4v tsl ngnnitFa brer Wish is unsupported. ......... RIB €O€y T1aW.._X�Y P PPOtled.l0 laluns may not work Please update browse rlry Ggggle GM1 sp_� Sbafe 100% !?I https://docs.google.com/file/d/OB8fj G80S 1 G-gbmh3 WUhzUlgwNne/edit?usp=drive web... 6/24/2014 SAM_0475.JPG - Google Drive Page 1 of 1 SAM Q475.JP.G-------- _________ .. __------- ----- --- - ------ _ _- ------- -------- -_- SIGN IN -- i File Ed7Qilaw °5ii81,,IersoOdmrewM1l net Explor ch Is unsup,oned. Some features may not workwmulty. Planes update your brome, orhy Geoule CM1 ase gpare .....IJ- i iIOWA https://does.google.com/file/d/OB8fjjG80S 1 G-gSEZPd3F2T3lYdUU/edit?usp=drive web&... 6/24/2014 SAM 0476.JPG - Google Drive Page 1 of 1 SAM-0476.JPAG - - ----------- _— _______._ _ ------ - ----- ____ ..._------- - --- - ---------- SIGNIN ev vrslon of Internet Explorer which b unsappwd.d. 3. ftlans Nev not workcnrtedty. Ples uutlele voar browse or Gaoale Ghro FnG €bu''S��v�_'IYA� m as, pkpt� e�,are a ,U4% 'e https://docs.google.com/file/d/OB8fjG80S 1 G-gTUp2Y3cxVXRHUnM/edit?usp=drive_we... 6/24/2014 SAM 0370.JPG - Google Drive Page 1 of 1 SAM 0370.JPG.. - --- --- - - ----- --------- - - ------ - ---- SIGN IN -- .......... s�n pverslon of File lntemel Explorer which Is ns vuppottA ctly' etl.5omel aNns may not ooomPlan EI Your N bI G000laC €dM1 y�l� � M�Ip snare 100% https://docs.google.com/file/dlOB8fjjG80S 1 G-gdO5UUIVCVOpIR2c/edit?usp=drive web&... 6/24/2014 SAM 0473.JPG - Google Drive HIS €GIt"ME"ITA raoy. Page 1 of 1 SIGN IN Isu supporreo. some ventures may not worn, cons ly. Please uoaale Your Browser or https:Hdocs.google.com/file/d/OB8fjjG80S 1 G-gVG9TUW5mVGRNQkF/edit?usp=drive_w... 6/24/2014 EXTENSION Representative: Wyatt B. Johnson �1bIINING CATV Clc�rnnr - CITY CLERKS OFFICE Name Address Dick Bagley 2125 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Susan Bagley 2125 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Donald L. Smith 2144 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Randal A. Petroviak 2116 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Ryan Brewer 2112 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Maureen Brewer 2112 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Anthony Martarano 2030 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Lisa Martarano 2030 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Rhonda Marcum 2309 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Rod Marcum 2309 W. Aspen Cove Dr. David Cordova 2165 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Jennice Cordova 2165 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Robert A. Marsland 2050 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Nadine Marsland 2050 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Jerry M. Ross 2302 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Jenen Ross 2302 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Loren D. Ross 2302 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Daniel J. Wilson 2271 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Tempra Wilson 2271 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Susan Carlson 2300 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Robert K. Carlson 2300 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Peggy L. Hickey 2143 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Glen E. Hickey 2143 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Lance Reiber 2289 W. Aspen Cove Circle Lynne A. Reiber 2289 W. Aspen Cove Circle Paul Bennett 2355 W. Aspen Cove Circle Cindy Bennett 2355 W. Aspen Cove Circle Philip J. Gardner 1920 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Cornelia E. Gardner 1920 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Keith Ebeling 2150 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Dianne Ebeling 2150 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Alice "Cis" Smith 2141 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Joe Kendall 2311 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Patsy Kendall 2311 W. Aspen Cove Dr. Curtis Elton 2906 W. Val Vista Ct. Naomi M. Elton 2906 W. Val Vista Ct. Rick Brecks 2625 W. Val Vista Ct. Nancy Brecks 2625 W. Val Vista Ct. Jeff Mendiola 2576 S. Ariel Ln. Jennifer Mendiola 2576 S. Ariel Ln. Robert Schoelkoph 2690 S. Ariel Ln. Jana Schoelkoph 2690 S. Ariel Ln. DATE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-UP SHEET June 24, 2014 ITEM # 7A PROJECT NUMBER AP 14-001 PROJECT NAME Southridge Gravel Mining PLEASE PRINT NAME -- FIRM �06 � .it•_. _�- CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-UP SHEET DATE June 24, 2014 ITEM # PROJECT NUMBER AP 14-001 7A PROJECT NAME Southridge Gravel Mining PLEASE PRINT NAME FOR AGAINST NEUTRAL BRIAM 5 -RE -,4 A A 1 de , JUN 2 4 2014 CITY CLERKS ME Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 24, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Mayor's Office: City Survey Acceptance MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Submitted to the City of Meridian, Idaho by: ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier Lane, Olathe, Kansas 66061 June 2014 E TC INSTITUTE 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report (iA TCE 2014 City of Meridian Executive Summary Report Overview ETC Institute administered a community survey for the City of Meridian in the spring of 2014. The survey was administered as part of the City's effort to assess citizen satisfaction with the quality of city services. This is the first time that Meridian has administered a community survey with ETC Institute. This report contains: ➢ a summary of the survey methodology and major survey findings ➢ charts and graphs showing the overall results for most questions on the survey (Section 1) ➢ benchmarking data that show how the results for Meridian compare to other cities across the U.S. and the Northwest region (Section 2) ➢ importance -satisfaction analysis that identifies priorities for investment (Section 3) ➢ tables that show the results for each question on the survey (Section 4) ➢ a copy of the survey instrument (Section 5) ➢ cross -tabular data by location of respondents (Appendix A) ➢ cross -tabular data by age and gender (Appendix B) ➢ GIS maps that show the results of selected questions on the survey (TO BE ADDED) (Appendix C) Methodology A seven -page survey was mailed to a random sample of 2,500 households throughout the City of Meridian. Approximately seven days after the survey was mailed, residents who received the survey were contacted by phone. Those who indicated that they had not returned the survey were given the option of completing it by phone. Households that received a survey in the mail also had the option of completing the survey online. On average, the survey took 15- 20 minutes to complete. Of the households that received a survey, 339 completed the survey by mail, 68 by phone and 107 online, for a total of 514 completed surveys. The results for the random sample of 514 households have a 95% level of confidence with a precision of at least ETC Institute (2014) (iA ETC 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report INSTITUTE +/-4.3%. There were no statistically significant differences in the results of the survey based on the method of administration (mail, phone, online). In order to better understand how well services are being delivered by the City, ETC Institute geocoded the home address of respondents to the survey. The map below shows the physical distribution of survey respondents based on the location of their home (TO BE ADDED). The percentage of "don't know" responses has been excluded from many of the graphs shown in this report to facilitate valid comparisons of the results from the City of Meridian with the results from other communities in the DirectionFinder® database. Since the number of "don't know" responses often reflects the utilization and awareness of city services, the percentage of "don't know" responses has been provided in the tabular data section of this report. When the "don't know" responses have been excluded, the text of this report will indicate that the responses have been excluded with the phrase "who had an opinion." MY V.111 0 FUJI 901 W.111 03 03 9 C Perception of the City and Community Profiles To gain a better understanding of characteristics that influence residents' perception of the City, ETC Institute conducted cross -tabular analysis of key demographic areas. This analysis provided valuable insight into how the perception of the City varies based on different demographic characteristics. Through analysis of the cross -tabular data, ETC Institute was able to determine the profile of the average resident with the most positive perceptions of the City in various areas, and also the profile of the average resident with the most negative perceptions of the City in various areas. More detailed cross -tabular analysis is provided in Appendix A and B of the report. Listed on the following pages are key findings based on the cross -tabular analysis. ETC Institute (2014) ETC 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report a INSTITUTE Overall Ouality of Services Provided by the City Overall 76% of residents surveyed who had an opinion indicated that the overall quality of services provided by the City exceeds their expectations (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10 -point scale). Eighty-one percent (81%) of residents in South Meridian indicated that the overall quality of City services provided exceeds their expectations, compared to 70% of residents in Central Meridian. How Well the City and Its Partners Are Meeting the Expectations of Residents Related to the Overall Quality of City Services Provided by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11 -point scale, where a rating of 11 meant "greatly exceeds expectations" and a rating of 0 meant "does not meet my expectations at all" (excluding "don't knoW') OVERALL 21% as Central Meridian 24% ex Northeast Meridian 34% 20% s% Northwest Meridian $% 21% South Meridian 18% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (Exceeds Expectations) 10-9 08-7 064 M3-0 (Does Not Meet Expectations) orncz: ETClmdrure DirecsonFinler(2014-Meridiar4 LD) Based on ETC Institute's demographic cross -tabular analysis, the characteristics of the average resident who has the most positive perception of the overall quality of city services provided are: • Female • Over age 65 • Live in South Meridian • Lived in the City for 6-10 years • Household income of $75,000 - $99,999 The characteristics of the average resident who has the most negative perception of the overall quality of city services provided are: • Male • Age 55 to 64 • Live in Central Meridian • Lived in the City for over 20 years • Household income of $100,000 - $149,000 ETC Institute (2014) iii ETC INSTITUTE Overall Ouality of Life in the Citv 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Overall 83% of residents surveyed who had an opinion indicated that the overall quality of life in the City exceeds their expectations (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10 -point scale). Eighty-nine percent (89%) of residents in South Meridian indicated that the overall quality of life in the City exceeds their expectations, compared to 80% of residents in Central Meridian. How Well the City and Its Partners Are Meeting the Expectations of Residents Related to the Overall Quality of Life in the City by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11 -pari scale, where a rating of 11 meant "greatly exceeds expectations" and a rating of 0 meant "does not meet my expectations at all" (excluding)dont know") OVERALL 15% Central Meridian 25% 1890 Northeast Meridian 38 18% Northwest Meridian 35% 14°d South Meridian 1 D 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% IIIIII(Exceeds Expectations) 10-9 128-7 06-4 X3-0 (Does Not Meet Expectations) 5o ce: ETC butinde DrecfionFmdef(2014-Meridimr, ID) Based on ETC Institute's demographic cross -tabular analysis, the characteristics of the average resident who has the most positive perception of the overall quality of life in the City are: • Female • Under age 35 • Live in South Meridian • Lived in the City for less than 5 years • Household income of $35,000 - $49,999 The characteristics of the average resident who has the most negative perception of the overall quality of life in the City are: • Male • Age 55 to 64 • Live in Central Meridian • Lived in the City for 16 to 20 years • Household income of under $35,000 ETC Institute (2014) iv 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report (iA TCE The City of Meridian as a Place to Live Overall 91% of residents surveyed who had an opinion rated the City of Meridian as an excellent or good place to live (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10 -point scale). Ninety-seven percent (97%) of residents in South Meridian rated the City of Meridian as an excellent or good place to live, compared to 89% of residents in Central Meridian and Northeast Meridian who rated the City as an excellent or good place to live. How Residents Rate the City of Meridian as a Place to Live by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11 -point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "excellerl" and a rat Ing of 0 mearl "poor• (exciudi no "don't Know") OVERALL Central Meridian Northeast Meridian Northwest Meridian Soutn Meridian 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% ■(Excellent)10-9 08-7 176-4 X9-0 (Poor) ETC Im ifvte DhWthnFb des Based on ETC Institute's demographic cross -tabular analysis, the characteristics of the average resident who has the most positive perception of the City of Meridian as a place to live are: • Male • Under age 35 • Live in South Meridian • Lived in the City for 6 to 10 years • Household income of $75,000 - $99,999 The characteristics of the average resident who has the most negative perception of the City of Meridian as a place to live are: • Female • Age 55 to 64 • Live in Northeast Meridian • Lived in the City for 16 to 20 years • Household income of under $35,000 ETC Institute (2014) V 42% 89 7543% 46°/0 11% 1% z 8% EME 51 41% 8961 46°io 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% ■(Excellent)10-9 08-7 176-4 X9-0 (Poor) ETC Im ifvte DhWthnFb des Based on ETC Institute's demographic cross -tabular analysis, the characteristics of the average resident who has the most positive perception of the City of Meridian as a place to live are: • Male • Under age 35 • Live in South Meridian • Lived in the City for 6 to 10 years • Household income of $75,000 - $99,999 The characteristics of the average resident who has the most negative perception of the City of Meridian as a place to live are: • Female • Age 55 to 64 • Live in Northeast Meridian • Lived in the City for 16 to 20 years • Household income of under $35,000 ETC Institute (2014) V ETC 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report a INSTITUTE Value Received for City Tax Dollars and Fees Overall 72% of residents surveyed who had an opinion feel they are getting their money's worth for the value they receive from City tax dollars and fees (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10 -point scale). Seventy-five percent (75a/o) of residents in South Meridian and Northeast Meridian feel they are getting their money's worth for the value received from City tax dollars and fees, compared to 67% of residents in Central Meridian. Ratings of the Value Received for City Tax Dollars and Fees by percentage of respondents who rated the item man 11 -point scale, where a rating of 10 meant residents felt they were "definitely getting their money's worth" and a rating of 0 meant residents felt they were"tlefindely not getting their money's worth" (excluding "tlonl know') OVERALL 22% 6% Central Meridian 23% 2496 9x m -n Northeast Meridian 25% /0 18% 7% Northwest Meridian 246°/0 24% South Meridian 20% �. 550l0 ME 23% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 1000"0 M(Definitely getting my moneys worth) 10-9 m8-7 06-4 m3-0 (Definitely not getting my moneys worth) So ca: ETC Institute DrectionFinder(2014-bferrdian, 0) Based on ETC Institute's demographic cross -tabular analysis, the characteristics of the average resident who has the most positive perception of the value they receive for City tax dollars are: • Female • Over age 65 • Live in Northeast Meridian • Lived in the City for 6 to 10 years • Household income of $50,000 - $74,999 The characteristics of the average resident who has the most negative perception of the the value they receive for City tax dollars are: • Male • Age 45 to 54 • Live in Central Meridian • Lived in the City for 16 to 20 years • Household income of under $35,000 ETC Institute (2014) vi 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report (tA TCE The City of Meridian Headed in the Ritht Direction Overall 67% of residents surveyed who had an opinion agree that the City of Meridian is headed in the right direction (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10 -point scale). Sixty-nine percent (69%) of residents in Northeast Meridian agree that the City of Meridian is headed in the right direction, compared to 64% of residents in Central Meridian who agree that the City is headed in the right direction. Level of Agreement That the City of Meridian Is Headed in the Right Direction by percentage of respondents who ra&d the item man 11 -point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "strongly agree" and a rating of o mean "strongly dl sagree" (e cludind "don't Know") OVERALL Central Meridian Northeast Meridian Northwest Meridian South Meridian Sm M ETC r W EE®I a �=� ®j II(! 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(Strorgly Agree)1" 08-7 06-4 MS -0 (Strongly Disagree) Based on ETC Institute's demographic cross -tabular analysis, the characteristics of the average resident who has the most positive perception that the City of Meridian is headed in the right direction are: • Female • Under age 35 • Live in Northeast Meridian • Lived in the City for 6 to 10 years • Household income of $50,000 - $74,999 The characteristics of the average resident who has the most negative perception that the City is headed in the right direction are: • Male • Age 45 to 54 • Live in Central Meridian • Lived in the City for more than 20 years • Household income of $35,000 - $49,999 ETC Institute (2014) vii (iSETC2014City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Comparative Benchmarks ETC Institute's DirectionFinder program was originally developed in 1999 to help community leaders across the United States use statistically valid community survey data as a tool for making better decisions. Since November of 1999, the survey has been administered in more than 210 cities in 43 states. Most participating cities conduct the survey on an annual or biennial basis. This report contains benchmarking data from two sources: (1) a national survey that was administered by ETC Institute to a random sample of more than 4,000 residents across the United States and (2) a regional survey administered to 416 residents living in the Northwest Region of the United States, which includes the states of Idaho, Colorado, Montana, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Nevada and Wyoming. The City of Meridian rated at or above the U.S. national average in 49 of the 54 areas that were assessed. It should also be noted that the City of Meridian rated significantly above the U.S. national average in 34 of the 54 areas, and significantly below the U.S. national average in only 4 of the 53 areas. Results are considered statistically significant if there is a difference of at least +/- 5%. These ratings place the City of Meridian as one of the highest performing communities. A complete list of benchmarking comparisons for the City of Meridian compared to the Northwest Region and the U. S. national average are included in Section 2 of the report. Areas Sienificantly Above the U.S. Avera¢e The City of Meridian rated significantly above the U.S. national average in 34 of the 54 areas that were assessed. The top 10 areas in which the City of Meridian scored the highest above the U.S. national average are: • Customer service from City employees (+23%) • Planning for future growth and development (+22%) • Safety in City parks (+19%) • Overall quality of City services provided (+19%) • Quality of athletic fields (+17%) • Communications (+17%) • Quality of local police protection (+15%) • Number of City parks (+15%) • Police response time to 911 emergencies (+14%) • Code enforcement (+14%) The complete list of areas in which the City of Meridian rated significantly above the U.S. national average is included on the following page: ETC Institute (2014) viii ETC INSTITUTE 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Category Customer service from City employees Meridian U.S. Average 55% Difference 23% 78% Planning for future growth & development 66% 44% 22% Safety in City parks 84% 65% 19% Overall quality of City services provided 76% 57% 19% Quality of athletic fields 86% 69% 17% Communications 63% 46% 17% Quality of local police protection 88% 73% 15% Number of City parks 86% 71% 15% Police response time to 911 emergencies 86% 72% 14% Code enforcement 64% 50% 14% As a place to raise a family 93% 80% 13% Appearance & maintenance of City parks 90% 77% 13% Fire safety education programs 77% 65% 12% Abandoned/junk automobile removal 67% 55% 12% Police department/law enforcement 85% 73% 12% Communication with the community 58% 46% 12% City parks 88% 77% 11% Public involvement in local decision-making 52% 41% 11% Overall feeling of safety in City 91% 80% 11% Sewer services 80% 70% 10% Recycling services 80% 71% 9% As a place to work 66% 58% 8% Quality of www.merldiancity.org 67% 59% 8% Clean-up of litter/debris on private property 55% 47% 8% Quality of adult sports programs/ events 58% 51% 7% Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 91% 84% 7% As a place to live 91% 84% 7% Information about City programs & services 59% 53% 6% Emergency medical services 90% 84% 6% Programs for seniors at Meridian Senior Center 65% 59% 6% Quality of youth sports programs 75% 69% 6% Recreation programs 76% 71% 5% Library services by Meridian Library District 85% 80% 5% Programs for youth 74% 69% 5% The table above is based on the percentage of residents who gave each area a positive rating. ETC Institute (2014) ix ,,ETC INSTITUTE 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Areas Slightly Abo%e the U.S. Average The City of Meridian rated slightly above or equal to the U.S. national average in 15 of the 54 areas that were assessed. Listed below are the areas in which the City of Meridian rated slightly above or equal to the U.S. national average: Category Effectiveness of communications w/ public Meridian U.S. Average 48% Difference 4% 52% Visibility of police in neighborhoods 61% 57% 4% Condition of roadway pavement in Meridian 63% 59% 4% Overall quality of life in City 83% 80% 3% Availability & condition of sidewalks 55% 52% 3% Fire response time to 911 emergencies 90% 87% 3% Quality of pathways for walking & biking 58% 55% 3% Traffic enforcement 67% 64% 3% Garbage/trash pick-up services 85% 82% 3% Weed abatement 51% 48% 3% Water services 76% 74% 2% Fire protection 91% 90% 1% Lakeview Golf Course 61% 60% 1% Overall quality of local fire protection 91% 90% 1% Ease of registering for programs or classes 62% 62% 0% The table above is based on the percentage of residents who gave each area a positive rating. Areas Slightly Below the U.S. Average There is only one area in which the City of Meridian rated slightly below the U.S. national average. Listed below is the area in which the City of Meridian rated slightly below the U.S. national average: Animal control 1 56% 1 59% 1 -3% The table above is based on the percentage of residents who gave each area a positive rating. ETC Institute (2014) x (tAETC2014City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Areas Significantly Below the U.S. Average The City of Meridian rated significantly below the U.S. national average in only 4 of the 54 areas that were assessed. Listed below are the areas in which the City of Meridian rated significantly below the U.S. national average: The table above is based on the percentage of residents who gave each area a positive rating. Priorities for Investment Recommended Priorities for the Next Two Years. In order to help the City identify investment priorities for the next two years, ETC histitute conducted an Importance - Satisfaction (I -S) analysis. This analysis examined the importance that residents placed on each City service and the level of satisfaction with each service. By identifying services of high importance and low satisfaction, the analysis identified which services will have the most impact on overall satisfaction with City services over the next two years. If the City wants to improve its overall satisfaction rating, the City should prioritize investments in services with the highest Importance Satisfaction (I -S) ratings. More details regarding the methodology and calculations for the Importance -Satisfaction (I -S) analysis are provided in Section 3 of this report. Based on the results of the Importance -Satisfaction (I -S) Analysis, the services that are recommended as the top priorities for investment over the next two years are listed below in descending order: 1) Planning and zoning services 2) Traffic enforcement 3) Programs for youth 4) Communications The complete Importance -Satisfaction Rating table is listed on the following page: ETC Institute (2014) xi ETC (,;/ JN.�-f 1-fLTc 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Importance -Satisfaction Rating 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey City Services Most Most Important Important Category of Service % Rank Satisfaction % Satisfaction Rank Importance - Satisfaction Rating I -S Rating Rank High Priority (IS .10-.201 Planning & zoning services 34% 1 55% 15 0.1555 1 Medium Priority (IS <10) Traffic enforcement 23% 4 67% 11 0.0767 2 Programs for youth 26% 3 74% 10 0.0666 3 Communications 17% 6 63% 14 0.0623 4 Code enforcement 14% 9 64% 13 0.0492 5 Police departmenf/law enforcement 30% 2 85% 4 0.0444 6 Recreation programs 14% 7 76% 9 0.0347 7 Recycling services 14% 8 80% 7 0.0285 8 Building services 7% 13 64% 12 0.0257 9 City parks 20% 5 88% 3 0.0250 10 Water services 10% 12 76% 8 0.0239 11 Fire protection 12% 10 91% 1 0.0106 12 Emergency medical services 11% 11 90% 2 0.0104 13 Sewer services 5% 15 80% 6 0.0091 14 Garbage/trash pick-up services 5% 14 85% 5 0.0078 1 15 Note: The I -S Rating is calculated by muhip/ying the "Most Important" % by (1 -Satisfaction' %) Most Important %: Tide -most Itnporlarr pememage represents rhe sun or#* irs; second, and tivrd mkeiryoftart respwees br each tm. Respontl were asked b berary Fe NmFey tMMshmld receive me mostemphass over the m)3W years. Satisfaction %: The'safsrarbn' pemariage representsme sun oure raigs'10; '9; '8' and '7' exdedng'donl knows.' Respondents ranked each eeruoe on a 10-mn sale, wherea railing of'10' meani'excelew and a raing oro- meam'poor © 2014 DirectionFinder by ETC Institute ETC Institute (2014) xii „ETC INSTITUTE Other Major Findings 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report ➢ Items That Influence Percentions of Meridian as a Community. Ninety-three percent (93%) of the residents surveyed, who had an opinion, indicated that the City of Meridian is an "excellent” or "good" place to raise a family (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10 - point scale); 91% indicated the City is an "excellent" or "good" place to live, and 73% gave the same ratings for their perception of how well the City is ensuring public safety. Residents gave the lowest ratings to the City's efforts in providing mobility options other than driving (27% rated "excellent" or "good"). ➢ How Well the City and Its Partners are Meeting Exnectations of Residents Related to Quality of Life. Eighty-three percent (83%) of the residents surveyed, who had an opinion, indicated that the overall quality of life in the City exceeds their expectations (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10 -point scale); 79% indicated their view of Meridian as an ideal place to live exceeds expectations, while 78% had the same opinion regarding customer service from City employees. When asked about the overall quality of City services provided, 76% of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, indicated that it exceeds expectations. ➢ Agreement with Various Statements About the City of Meridian. Eighty-four percent (84%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, indicated they either "strongly agree" or "agree" that quality housing and a variety of options exist in Meridian (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10 -point scale). Other statements about the City with the same level of agreement include: quality shopping/entertainment are accessible (82%), and development in Meridian enhances quality of life (75%). The lowest level of agreement among residents surveyed, who had an opinion, concerns the variety of employment opportunities that exist (47% either "strongly agree" or "agree"). ➢ Ratings of the Value Received for Meridian's City Utility Services. Eighty-two percent (82%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, indicated Meridian's residential trash collection services are a "very good" or "good" value (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10 -point scale). Other utility services with the same perceived value include: curbside recycling services (82%), City sewer services (78%), and City water services (75%). ➢ Overall Ratings of City Services. Ninety-one percent (91%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, rated the City's fire protection service as either "excellent" or "good" (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10 -point scale). Other City services receiving "excellent" or "good" ratings include: emergency medical services (90%), City parks (87%), police department/law enforcement (85%), garbage/trash pick-up services (841/o), sewer services (80%), and recycling services (80%). ETC Institute (2014) xiii 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report (iA TCE ➢ City Services That Should Receive the Most Emphasis From City Leaders Over the Next Two Years. Based on the sum of their top three choices, the City services that residents thought should receive the most emphasis over the next two years include: planning and zoning services (34%), police department/law enforcement (30%), and programs for youth (26%). ➢ Ratings of Services Provided by Other Governmental Entities, Agencies or Groups. Eighty-five percent (85%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, rated the library services by Meridian Library District as either "excellent" or "good" (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10 -point scale). Other services provided that residents rated as "excellent" or "good" include: programs for seniors at Meridian Senior Center (65%), Lakeview Golf Course (61%), and animal control (56%). ➢ Ratings of Road -Related Aspects of the Community. Sixty-five percent (651/o) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, rated the maintenance of signs/pavement markings as either "excellent" or "good" (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10 -point scale). Other road -related aspects that citizens rated as "excellent" or "good" include: condition of roadway pavement in Meridian (63%), adequacy of street lighting on arterial roads (56%), and availability and condition of sidewalks (55%). ➢ Priority of Various Projects Residents Would Like to See in Meridian. Sixty- seven percent (67%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, indicated that providing more public transportation options should be a high priority in Meridian (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10 -point scale). Other projects that residents indicated should be high priority include: constructing the Linder Road overpass (56%), adding more bike lanes and pathways (56%), and redeveloping downtown (50%). ➢ Ratings of the City's Communication Services. Sixty-seven percent (67%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, rated the quality of the City website (www.meridiancity.org) as either "excellent" or "good" (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10 -point scale). Other communication services that residents rated as "excellent" or "good" include: usefulness of online services on City website (66%), information about City programs and services (59%), effectiveness of communication with the public (52%) and public involvement in local decision-making (52%). ➢ Ratings of Parks and Recreation Services. Ninety percent (90%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, rated the appearance and maintenance of City parks as either "excellent" or "good" (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10 -point scale). Other parks and recreation services that residents rated as "excellent" or "good" include: quality of athletic fields (86%), number of City parks (86%), number of athletic fields (81%), quality of youth sports programs (75%), availability of youth sports programs (74%), and ease of registering for picnic shelters (73%). ETC Institute (2014) AV ETC2014City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report ➢ Ratings of Public Safety Services. Ninety-one percent (91%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, rated their overall feeling of safety in the City as either "excellent" or "good" (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10 -point scale). Other public safety services that residents rated as "excellent" or "good" include: emergency medical services (EMS) (911/o), overall quality of local fire protection (90%), fire response time to 911 emergencies (90%), quality of local police protection (88%), professionalism of emergency responders (87%), and police response time to 911 emergencies (86%). ➢ Enforcement of City Codes and Ordinances. Seventy-nine percent (79%) of residents surveyed, who had an opinion, rated the removal of graffiti as either "excellent" or "good" (rating of 7 to 10 on a 10 -point scale). Other enforcement of codes and ordinances that residents rated as "excellent" or "good" include: abandoned/junk automobile removal (67%), illegal dumping (63%), clean-up of litter/debris on private property (55%), dilapidated houses or buildings (55%), and weed abatement (51 %). Other Findings ➢ 82% of residents indicated they or someone in their household has visited a Meridian City park in the past 12 months. Of those, 67% visited a City park at least once a month. ➢ Nearly all (97.8%) of residents surveyed indicated they have a working smoke detector in the home. ➢ 85% of residents surveyed indicated they visited downtown Meridian at least once during the past year. Of those, 77% visited for leisure purposes. ETC Institute (2014) xv 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Section 1: Charts and Graphs ETC Institute (2014) Page 1 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q1. Ratings of Items that Influence Perceptions of Meridian as a Community by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11 -point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "excellent" and a rating of 0 meant 'poor" (excluding "don't know"1 As a place to raise a family As a place to live How well City is ensuring public safety Efforts to maintain quality neighborhoods Building a strong sense of community As a place to start/do business Efforts to protect the quality of air/water As a place to work Developing a strong local economy Planning forfuture growth & development Developing sustainable/conscious environment Communication with the community Howwell City is improving Downtown Developing a strong local workforce Providing mobility options other than driving 0% Source: ETC rmtawe DirecdonFirder (1014 - Meridian, ID) 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% O(Excellent) 10-9 ®6-7136-4 1111113-0(Poor) Q2. How Well the City and Its Partners are Meeting the Expectations of Residents Related to Quality of Life in Meridian by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11 -point scale, where a rating of 10 meant 'greatly exceeds expectations" and a rating of 0 meant "does not meet my expectations at all" (excluding "don't know"1 Overall quality of fife in City Your view of an ideal place to live Customer service from City employees Overall quality of City services provided 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(Exceeds Expectations) 10-9 208-7 136-4 1111113-0 (Does Not Meet Expectations) So.: ETC I itnte DirectmnFnder (1014 - Meridiaa, ID) ETC Institute (2014) Page 2 ®' '/NOIIIIIIII M ///////fes �' .,///////// V0 1�4'JtS'4•L//� 0% Source: ETC rmtawe DirecdonFirder (1014 - Meridian, ID) 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% O(Excellent) 10-9 ®6-7136-4 1111113-0(Poor) Q2. How Well the City and Its Partners are Meeting the Expectations of Residents Related to Quality of Life in Meridian by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11 -point scale, where a rating of 10 meant 'greatly exceeds expectations" and a rating of 0 meant "does not meet my expectations at all" (excluding "don't know"1 Overall quality of fife in City Your view of an ideal place to live Customer service from City employees Overall quality of City services provided 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(Exceeds Expectations) 10-9 208-7 136-4 1111113-0 (Does Not Meet Expectations) So.: ETC I itnte DirectmnFnder (1014 - Meridiaa, ID) ETC Institute (2014) Page 2 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q5. Ratings of the Value Received for City Tax Dollars and Fees by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11 -mint scale, where a rating of 10 meant residents felt they were definitely getting their money's worth" and a rating of 0 meant residents felt they were "definitely not getting their moneys worth" (excludina'don't know") Definitely NOT geeing my moneys wo^h 3-2 Definitely money 48% Source: EX Imrimte DirectionFitder (2014 - Meridian, ID) ETC Institute (2014) Page 3 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q6. Ratings of the Value Received for Meridian's City Utility Services by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11 -point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "very good value" and a rating of 0 meant `very poor value" (excluding "don't know"1 Residential trash collection services Curbside recycling services Value received for City sewer services Value received for Citywater services 0% 20% 40% 600/0 80% 100% (Very Good Value) 10-9 08-7 06-4 111113-0 (Very Poor Value) Source: ETCIm itute Direction Finder (2014 - Meridiaa ID) • i � %/O%%%%%���'%%%%%%%moi � t • i � %/O%%%%%���'%%%%%%%moi ETC Institute (2014) Page 4 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q8. City Services that Residents Felt Should Receive the Most Emphasis from City Leaders Over the Next Two Years by percentage of respondents who selected the item as one of their top THREE choices Planning & zoning services Police departmentrlaw enforcement Programs for youth Traffic enforcement City parks Communications Recreation programs Recycling services Code enforcement Fire protection Emergency medical services Water services Building services Garbage/trash pick-up services Sewer services 0% 34% 30% 26% 23% 20% 17°/d 14% 14% 14% 12% 11% 10% 7% 5% 5% Source: ETCInstawe DirecnaaFirder (2014 - Merdiaq ID) 20% 40% 1st Choice 02nd Choice 3rd Choice Q9. Ratings of Services Provided by Other Governmental Entities, Agencies or Groups by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11 -point scale, where a rating of 10 meant'excellent" and a rating of 0 meant "poor" (excluding "don't know"1 Library services by Meridian Library District Programs for seniors at Meridian Senior Ctr Lakeview Golf Course Animal control K-12 education by Joint School District No. 2 Bringing newjobs to area Public transportation services 0% Source: EX Imriowe Direction Finder (2014 - Meridian, ID) 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(Excellent) 10-9 ®8-7 06-4 113-0 (Poor) ETC Institute (2014) Page 5 1' 0% Source: EX Imriowe Direction Finder (2014 - Meridian, ID) 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(Excellent) 10-9 ®8-7 06-4 113-0 (Poor) ETC Institute (2014) Page 5 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q10. Ratings of Road -Related Aspects of the Community by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11 -point scale, where a rating of 10 meant'excellent" and a rating of 0 meant'poor" (excluding'don't know"1 Maintenance of signs/pavement markings Condition of roadway pavement in Meridian Adequacy of street lighting on arterial roads Availability & condition of sidewalks Bike lanes on roads Management of traffic flow & congestion 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(Excellent) 10-9 08-7 06-4 1111113-0 (Poor) Sow : ETC rmtawe DvectionEinder (2014 - Meridian, ID) Ratingsof • of •us Projects Residents Would Like to See in Meridian by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11 -point scale, where a rating of 10 meant 'high priority" and a rating of 0 meant "no prionty" (excluding Kdon't know' Providing mom public transportation options ��=M Is •— Constructing Linder Road overpass /iRedeveloping Downtown Adding mom bike lanes & pathways Developing a pathway along rail corridor Add gym space for recreation programs Sports stadium & recreation w%e Building a performing Arts Center 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (High Priority) 10-9 08-7 06-4 1111113-0 (No Priority) Sow : ETClmrdwe D rectionFinder (2014 - Meridian, ID) ETC Institute (2014) Page 6 ® //j®® 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(Excellent) 10-9 08-7 06-4 1111113-0 (Poor) Sow : ETC rmtawe DvectionEinder (2014 - Meridian, ID) Ratingsof • of •us Projects Residents Would Like to See in Meridian by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11 -point scale, where a rating of 10 meant 'high priority" and a rating of 0 meant "no prionty" (excluding Kdon't know' Providing mom public transportation options ��=M Is •— Constructing Linder Road overpass /iRedeveloping Downtown Adding mom bike lanes & pathways Developing a pathway along rail corridor Add gym space for recreation programs Sports stadium & recreation w%e Building a performing Arts Center 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (High Priority) 10-9 08-7 06-4 1111113-0 (No Priority) Sow : ETClmrdwe D rectionFinder (2014 - Meridian, ID) ETC Institute (2014) Page 6 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q12. The City has built much of its current park system through partnerships with developers and non-profit organizations. The City is considering a partnership approach with a non-profit organization that would help meet the City's need for gym space for recreation programs. Are you supportive of the City using this approach? by pecentage of respondents Sow : ETCIm itnte DirectionFitder (2014 - Meridian, ID) 11% sure 1% ETC Institute (2014) Page 7 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q14. Where do you currently get information about Meridian's services and programs? by percentage of respondents (multiple choices could be made) Flyers in utility bills 56 0 Televisioni 50% City website 42% Newspaper 42% Information booklets/City publications �19% Emails from City Radio 1f% Library 13% Facebook 10% 1 1 Chamber of Commerce/Visitor Center 3% Events such as Coffee with the Mayor 30% Twitter 2% Other 5% 0% 20% 40% 60% Sow : EX Im itute Direction Finder (2014 - Meridiax, ID) Q15. How would yourp efer to receive information about Meridian's services and programs? by percentage of respondents (multiple choices could be made) Flyers in utility bills 48% Traditional media 45% City's website 30% Emails 34% City publications 22% Social media4% Mobile applications Texts13F/bOther5% 0% 20% 40% 60% Source: ETC Im itute Direction Finder (2014 - Meridian, ID) ETC Institute (2014) Page 8 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q16. Ratings of Parks and Recreation Services by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11 -point scale, where a rating of 10 meant 'excellent' and a rating of 0 meant "poor" (excludinc'don't know" Appearance & maintenance of City parks Quality of athleticfields Number of City parks Number of athletic fields Quality of youth sports programs Availability of youth sports programs Ease of registering for picnic shelters Availability of parks/green space Ease of registering for programs or classes Number of special events & festivals Quality/variety of special events &festivals Cost of recreational sports programs/classes Quality of adult sports programs/ events Information about recreation programs/classes Quality of pathways forwalking & biking Quality/variety of recreation programs/Gasses Number of recreation programs & classes Number of adult sports programs/events Number of pathways forwalking & biking Availability of community center/gyms 0% Su.: ETCI tdvte DirecHonFirder (2014 - Merdiaa, ID) 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 017. In the past 12 months, have you or anyone in your household visited a City of Meridian park? by percentage of respondents Yes, a household member has visited a City park Suw : ETC Imirdwe Direction Finder(2014-Meridian, ID) )s, I have personally .sited a City park ETC Institute (2014) Page 9 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q1 7a. How often did you or someone in your household visit a City Park? by percentage of respondents who indicated they or someone in their household had visited a City park during the past year Less than oncelmonth 29% Don't know 4% Once a month 19% \\' Once a week or more 24% 2-3 times a month 24% Sowce: ETCIm irate DirectionFirder (2014 - Meridian, ID) Q18. Thinking about the City of Meridian park system, which would you rather see emphasized? by percentage of respondents Development of large regional or community parks with a varieh, ^f --ifi— know 0 Development of more neighborhood parks Source: ETC Im idwe DirectionFitder (2014 - Meridian, ID) ETC Institute (2014) Page 10 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q19. Do you have a working smoke detector in your home? by percentage of respondents Sowce: EX Im itate DirectionFitder (2014 - Meridian, ID) know M No 0.4% Q20. The National Standard for the Fire Department to respond to an emergency is 5 minutes or less 90 of the time from when the Department is alerted to a call. The City of Meridian's Fire Department currently responds to emergencies in 7 minutes or less 90 of the time and meets the national standard 56.6 of the time. Does this response time meet your level of service expectation? by percentage of respondents Don't know 3% Yes -111111 70% No 27% Source: ETC 1mritnte DirectionFitder (2014 - Meridian, ID) ETC Institute (2014) Page 11 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q21. Ratings of Public Safety Services by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11 -point scale, where a rating of 10 meant 'excellent" and a rating of 0 meant "poor' (excluding "don't know') Overall feeling of safety in City Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Overall quality of local fire protection Fire response time to 911 emergencies Quality of local police protection Professionalism of emergency responders Police response time to 911 emergencies Location of fire stations Safety in City parks Fire safety education programs Police safety education programs Visibility of police in neighborhoods 48% 43% e% 55% 36% jr 8% 53% 37%% 9% 54% 360/6 9% 1 50% 38% 9% 52% 35% 9% 50% 36% 110/. 48% 38% 1 13% 1 41% 1 43% 114% 42% 35% 190/. 38% 1 34% 'M 20% 1 8% 28% 33% /' 25% 1 15% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% N(Exoellent) 105 ®8-7136-4 111111113-0(Poor) Sov : ETC rmtawe DvecdonFirder (2014 - Meridiaa ID) Q22. Ratings of the Enforcement of City Codes and Ordinances by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11 -point scale, where a rating of 10 meant'excellent" and a rating of 0 meant "poor" (excluding 'don't know" Removal of graffiti Abandonedlunk automobile removal Illegal dumping Clean-up of litter/debris on private property Dilapidated houses or buildings Weed abatement 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% M(Exeellent) 10-9 08-7 E36-4 111111113-0(Poor) Source: ETC1mritute DireetionFinder (2014 - Meridian, ID) ETC Institute (2014) Page 12 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q23. Ratings of the Sense of Community in Neighborhoods Throughout Meridian by percentage of respondents who rated the item on an 11 -point scale, where a rating of 10 meant "very strong sense of community" and a rating of 0 meant' no sense of community at all" (excluding' don't know"1 No sense of community at all 1-0 5% 3-2 9% Very strong sense of community 10-9 22% 64 28% 8-7 36% Snnrce: 1,1Z' In,Wul, Uirec[innl-index (2014 -Aferidian, !U) Q24. The City and its community partners have been focused on Downtown redevelopment such as enhancing signage, adding kiosks with information, and community events. Did you visit Downtown at least once during the past year? by percentage of respondents Don't remember 2% No 13% Yes 85% 11111 Snemce: CIZ'bu[i[n[e Uirec[innPinder(2014-Iferidion, 10) ETC Institute (2014) Page 13 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q24a. What was the nature of your visit(s) to downtown? by percentage of respondents who had visited downtown during the past year (multiple choices could be made) Leisure 7 % Business 3$% Shopping 33% City Mall 25% Festival, parade, or other event 21% Cultural event 6% 00/0 20% 40% 60% 80% Source: ETC rm itnte DvectionFinder (2014 - Meridian, ID) Q24b. How many times did you visit Downtown Meridian for purposes other than work? by percentage of respondents who had visited downtown during the past year Less than 5 times 35% Don't know 3% -20+ times 22% 5 to 10 times 27% 11 to 20 times 13% Source: ETC lmritute Direction Finder (2014 - Meridian, ID) ETC Institute (2014) Page 14 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q24c. When you think about your visits to Downtown over the last year, how satisfied were you with your overall experience? by percentage of respondents who had visited downtown during the past year Somewhat satisfied 26% Very satisfied 31% Neutral 26% Don't know Very dissatisfied 2% 6% Somewhat dissatisfied 7% Source: ETClnvtitute DirectionFitder (2014 - Mendiaa ID) Q27. Gender of Respondents by percentage of respondents Lisle ozw Source: ETC lmritute DirectionFitder (2014 - Meridian, ID) ETC Institute (2014) Page 15 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q28. Age of Respondents by percentage of respondents 18 to 34 17% 35 to 44 Not provided 20% 1% 65+ 21% 45 to 54 21% 55 to 64 20% Snnrce: I lnsww, Direct ... ]-under2014 -Meridian, lU/ Q29. Which of the following be describes the home in which you live? by percentage of respondents A detached single-family house 92° Townhouse or duplex 3% An apartment 2% A manufactured trailer or mobile home 1% Acondominium 0.4% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% lberrec: Y[('I..w rcUirecrionPinder 2014-,%kirmb., lU/ ETC Institute (2014) Page 16 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q30. Do you own or rent your home? by percentage of respondents Other �% Rent 11% Own 88% Sowce: EX Im itate DirectionFitder (2014 - Meridian, ID) Q31. How many years have you lived in Meridian? by percentage of respondents 5 years or less 19% Not Provided 5% 6 to 10 years 31+ years 28% 5% 21 to 30 years 9% 16 to 20 years 11 to 15 years 16% 18% Sowce: ETC Imfitnte DirectionFinder (2014 - Meridian, ID) ETC Institute (2014) Page 17 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q32. Ages of Household Occupants by percentage of respondents Ages j5 17 Ages 10-14 9% Ages 5-9 9% Under Age 5 5% Ag418+j 72% S..: ETCI titate DlrechonFlnder (2014 - Meridian, ID) Q33. Does your household have a dog? by percentage of respondents No 55% 033a. How many dogs do you have in your household? 45% Three, 45% Notpmided 5% 3% One 65% Two 27% Source: ETC Im irate DirectionFitder (2014- Meridian, ID) ETC Institute (2014) Page 18 No 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q33. Does your household have a dog? by percentage of respondents Yes Q33b. Do you know that Meridian requires 45% dogs to be licensed annually? Yes 10% Source: ET Imotnte Direction Finder (2014- Meridian, ID) 034. Which of the following best describes your current employment status? by percentage of respondents Employed full time Retired Not employed outside home, a homemakerIgq/, Employed part time Self-employed Not employed due to a disability Not employed, but seeking work A studentworking part time Not employed, but not seeking work Afull-time student, not working A student working full time 20% 53% 0% 20% 40% 60% Source: ETCImotnte Direction Finder (2014 - Meridian, ID) ETC Institute (2014) Page 19 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q35. What is the approximate total annual family income of all members of your household? by percentage of respondents $35,000-$49,999 $50,000-$74,999 14% 19% $20,000-$34,999 8% Less than $20,000 4% $75,000-$99,999 16% Not sure/not provided 15% $200,000+ $100,000-$149,999 3% 18% $150,000-$199,999 3% Sow : EX Im itnte Direction Finder (2014 - Meridian, ID) Q36. Do you have a landline telephone in your home that is used to make and receive calls? by percentage of respondents No 22% 036a. In addition to your normal telephone, do you have a cell phone in your home that Yes is used to make and receive calls? 78% Yes 93% No Not provided 6% 1% Source: ETC Im itwe Direction Finder (2014 - Meridian, ID) ETC Institute (2014) Page 20 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q36. Do you have a landline telephone in your home that is used to make and receive calls? by percentage of respondents No 22% 036b. Do you primarily use your cell phone, landline or both to make and receive calls? Yes 78% Primarily use landline 28% Primarily use cell 28% Use both equally 40% Not provided 4% S..: EX Institute DirectionFitder (2014 - Meridfoq ID) Q37. Do you have a cell phone in your home that is used to make and receive calls? by percentage of respondents Not promded 6% No 8% Yes 86% Source: ETC Im itnte DirectionFitder (2014 - Meridian, ID) ETC Institute (2014) Page 21 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Community of Respondents by percentage of respondents Northeast Meridian 31% Northwest Meridian 32% Central Meridian 4i 0 20% South Meridian 17% Sowce: ETCIm itnte DirectionFitder (2014 - Meridian, ID) ETC Institute (2014) Page 22 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Section 2: Benchmarking Analysis ETC Institute (2014) Page 23 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Benchmarking Summary Report Meridian, Idaho Overview ETC Institute's DirectionFinder program was originally developed in 1999 to help community leaders across the United States use statistically valid community survey data as a tool for making better decisions. Since November of 1999, the survey has been administered in more than 210 cities in 43 states. Most participating cities conduct the survey on an annual or biennial basis. This report contains benchmarking data from two sources: (1) a national survey that was administered by ETC Institute to a random sample of more than 4,000 residents across the United States and (2) a regional survey administered to 416 residents living in the Northwest Region of the United States, which includes the states of Idaho, Colorado, Montana, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Nevada and Wyoming. Interpreting the Charts The charts on the following pages show how the overall results for Meridian compare to the national average based on the results of an annual survey that was administered by ETC Institute to a random sample of more than 4,000 U.S. residents and the regional survey administered to 416 residents living in the Northwest Region of the United States. The City of Meridian's results are shown in blue, the Northwest Region are shown in red and the National Averages are shown in tan in the charts on the following pages. ETC Institute (2014) Page 24 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report National Benchmarks Note: The benchmarking data contained in this report is protected intellectual property. Any reproduction of the benchmarking information in this report by persons or organizations not directly affiliated with the City of Meridian is not authorized without written consent from ETC Institute. Ratings of Items that Influence Perceptions of the City Meridian vs. Northwest Region vs. the U.S. by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item( don't knows) 93% Asa placeto raise a family 82% 80% 91% As a place to live 86% 84 % 66% As a place to work 62% 68% 66% Planning for future growth 8 development 139% 44% 418% Communication with the community 113 % 46% 1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% So.: 2014 ETC Institute MMerldian MNorthwest Region OU.S. ETC Institute (2014) Page 25 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Ratings of Items Related to Quality of Life Meridian vs. Northwest Region vs. the U.S. by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don't knows) 83% Overall quality of fife in City 776% 0% 0% % Customer service from City employees 50% 5$% Overall quality of City services provided 55% 57% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Source: 2014 ETC Institute mMeridian ON00hwest Region [:]U.S. Overall Ratings of City Services Meridian vs. Northwest Region vs. the U.S. by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings ter the item lexcl id'ng dont knows) Fire protection Emergency medical services City parks Police department/law enforcement Garbagettrash pick-up services Sewer services Recycling services Water services Recreation programs Programs for youth Traffic enforcement Code enforcement Communications 0% So.: 2014 ETC Institute 85% 180% 64% r 63 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 111111111Merldlan MNonhwest Region OU.S. ETC Institute (2014) Page 26 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Ratings of Services Provided by Other Governmental Entities, Agencies and Groups Meridian vs. Northwest Region vs. the U.S. by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don't knows) Library services by Meridian Library District Programs for seniors at Meridian Senior Ctr Lakeview Colt Course Animal control K-12 education by Joint School District No. 2 Public transportation services Sowce: 2014 ETC Institute 85% 84% 180% 65% ' 59% ;5% 6% %65%3% 21% 43 0% 20% 40% 60% �Meridion WNorthwest Region OU.S. 80% 100% Ratings of Road -Related Aspects of the Community Meridian vs. Northwest Region vs. the U.S. by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don't knows) 63% Condition of roadway pavement in Meridian 55% 159% 5 % Adequacy of street lighting on arterial roads 65% 63% 55% Availability & condition of sidewalks 54% 52%' Management of traffic flow & congestion 54% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% MMerldian MNorthwest Region DU.S. So.: 2014 ETC Institute ETC Institute (2014) Page 27 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Ratings of Communication Services Meridian vs. Northwest Region vs. the U.S. by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don't knows) 67% Quality of www.meridiancity.org 56P/ 159% 159% Information about City programs 8 services 49% 53Yy 52% Effectivenessofcommunicationsw/public 43% 48% 1 520% Public involvement in local decision-making 41% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% MMerldian IN Northwest Region OU.S. Sowce: 2014 ETC Institute Ratings of Parks and Recreation Services Meridian vs. Northwest Region vs. the U.S. by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don't knows) Appearance 8 maintenance of City parks Quality of athletic fields Number of City parks Quality of youth sports programs Ease of registering for programs or classes Quality of adult sports programs/ events Quality of pathways for waking 8 biking 90% 81% 77% 86% 68% 69 6 86% 6% 71%1 75% 741% 69% 1 62% 57% 62% j8% 5411 1 51%1 1 0066% 1 111111Meridlan IN Northwest Region EJU.S. So.: 2014 ETC Institute ETC Institute (2014) Page 28 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Ratings of Public Safety Services Meridian vs. Northwest Region vs. the U.S. by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don't knows) Overall feeling of safety in City 80% gg Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 86 %� 84 Overall quality of local fire protection g % gg 0 Fire response time to 911 emergencies 9S% 87 Quality of local police protection 88%736/6 86% Police response time to 911 emergencies % 1 1 72% Safety in City parks 65 84% 11 Fire safety education programs 64% 77% gg 65% Visibility of police in neighborhoods 8°°o UY zuY `FIND W"6 W"6 luu' lzuU Meridian 11111111INorthwestRegion OU.S. Soun:e: 2014 ETC Institute Ratings of the Enforcement of Codes and Ordinances Meridian vs. Northwest Region vs. the U.S. by percentage of respondents who gave positive ratings for the item (excluding don't knows) 67% Abandoned/junk automobile removal 57% 55% 50% Clean-up of litter/debris on private property '39% 47% Weed abatement YB% 48% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% MMerldian MNorthwest Region OU.S. So.: 2014 ETC Institute ETC Institute (2014) Page 29 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Section 3: Importance -Satisfaction Analysis ETC Institute (2014) Page 30 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Importance -Satisfaction Analysis The City of Meridian, ID Overview Today, city officials have limited resources which need to be targeted to activities that are of the most benefit to their citizens. Two of the most important criteria for decision making are (1) to target resources toward services of the highest importance to citizens; and (2) to target resources toward those services where citizens are the least satisfied. The Importance -Satisfaction (IS) rating is a unique tool that allows public officials to better understand both of these highly important decision making criteria for each of the services they are providing. The Importance -Satisfaction rating is based on the concept that cities will maximize overall citizen satisfaction by emphasizing improvements in those service categories where the level of satisfaction is relatively low and the perceived importance of the service is relatively high. Methodology The rating is calculated by summing the percentage of responses for items selected as the first, second, and third most important services for the City to emphasize over the next two years. This sum is then multiplied by 1 minus the percentage of respondents who gave a positive rating for the City's performance in the related area (the sum of the ratings of "10," "9," "8" and "7" on a 10 -point scale excluding "don't know" responses). "Don't know" responses are excluded from the calculation to ensure that the positive ratings among service categories are comparable. [IS=Importance x (1 -Satisfaction)]. Example of the Calculation. Respondents were asked to identify the city services they thought were most important for the City to emphasize over the next two years. Approximately thirty- four percent (34.4%) of residents selected "planning and zoning services" as one of the most important major services for City leaders to emphasize. ETC Institute (2014) Page 31 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report With regard to satisfaction, approximately fifty-five percent (54.8%) of the residents surveyed rated the City's "planning and zoning services" as a "10", "9," "8" or "7" on a 10 -point scale (where a rating of "10" meant "excellent" and a rating of "0" meant "poor"). The I -S rating for "planning and zoning services" was calculated by multiplying the sum of the most important percentages by 1 minus the sum of the satisfaction percentages. In this example, 34.4% was multiplied by 45.2% (1-0.548). This calculation yielded an I -S rating of 0.1555, which ranked first out of fifteen major City services. The maximum rating is 1.00 and would be achieved when 100% of the respondents select an item as one of their top three choices to emphasize over the next two years and 0% indicate that they are positively satisfied with the delivery of the service. The lowest rating is 0.00 and could be achieved under either one of the following two situations: • if 100% of the respondents were positively satisfied with the delivery of the service • if none (0%) of the respondents selected the service as one of the three most important areas for the City to emphasize over the next two years. Interpreting the Ratings Ratings that are greater than or equal to 0.20 identify areas that should receive significantly more emphasis over the next two years. Ratings from .10 to .20 identify service areas that should receive increased emphasis. Ratings less than .10 should continue to receive the current level of emphasis. • Definitely Increase Emphasis (IS>=0.20) • Increase Current Emphasis (0.10<=IS<0.20) • Maintain Current Emphasis (IS<0.10) The results for Meridian are provided on the following page. ETC Institute (2014) Page 32 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Importance -Satisfaction Rating 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey City Services Most Most Importance - Important Important Satisfaction Satisfaction Satisfaction I -S Rating Category of Service % Rank % Rank Rating Rank High Priority (IS .10-.20) Planning & zoning services 34% 1 55% 15 0.1555 Medium Priority (IS <. 1O) Traffic enforcement 23% 4 67% 11 0.0767 Programs for youth 26% 3 74% 10 0.0666 Communications 17% 6 63% 14 0.0623 Code enforcement 14% 9 64% 13 0.0492 Police department/law enforcement 30% 2 85% 4 0.0444 Recreation programs 14% 7 76% 9 0.0347 Recycling services 14% 8 80% 7 0.0285 Building services 7% 13 64% 12 0.0257 City parks 20% 5 88% 3 0.0250 Water services 10% 12 76% 8 0.0239 Fire protection 12% 10 91% 1 0.0106 Emergency medical services 11% 11 90% 2 0.0104 Sewer services 5% 15 80% 6 0.0091 Garbage/trash pick-up services 5% 14 85% 5 0.0078 Note: The 1-S Rating is calculated by multiplying the "Most Important" %by (1 -'Satisfaction' %) Most Important %: The 'Most Importantpercentage represents the sum of the first, second, and third most important responses for each item. Respondents were asked to identify the items they thought should receive the most emphasis over the next two years. Satisfaction %: The'Satsfacton' percentage represents the sum of the rat ngs'10,­9,­8' and'T excluding 'don1 knows' Respondents ranked each service on a 10 -point scale, where a rating of '10' meant 'excellent' and a rating of '0' meant 'poor' © 2014 Direction Finder by ETC Institute 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ETC Institute (2014) Page 33 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Importance -Satisfaction Matrix Analysis The Importance -Satisfaction rating is based on the concept that public agencies will maximize overall customer satisfaction by emphasizing improvements in those areas where the level of satisfaction is relatively low and the perceived importance of the service is relatively high. ETC Institute developed an Importance -Satisfaction Matrix to display the perceived importance of major services that were assessed on the survey against the perceived quality of service delivery. The two axes on the matrix represent Satisfaction (vertical) and relative Importance (horizontal). The I -S (Importance -Satisfaction) matrix should be interpreted as follows. • Continued Emphasis (above average importance and above average satisfaction). This area shows where the City is meeting customer expectations. Items in this area have a significant impact on the customer's overall level of satisfaction. The City should maintain (or slightly increase) emphasis on items in this area. • Exceeding Expectations (below average importance and above average satisfaction). This area shows where the City is performing significantly better than customers expect the City to perform. Items in this area do not significantly affect the overall level of satisfaction that residents have with City services. The City should maintain (or slightly decrease) emphasis on items in this area. • Opportunities for Improvement (above average importance and below average satisfaction). This area shows where the City is not performing as well as residents expect the City to perform. This area has a significant impact on customer satisfaction, and the City should DEFINITELY increase emphasis on items in this area. • Less Important (below average importance and below average satisfaction). This area shows where the City is not performing well relative to the City's performance in other areas; however, this area is generally considered to be less important to residents. This area does not significantly affect overall satisfaction with City services because the items are less important to residents. The agency should maintain current levels of emphasis on items in this area. Matrices showing the results for Meridian are provided on the following pages. ETC Institute (2014) Page 34 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Importance -Satisfaction Assessment Matrix -Ory erv►ces- (points on the graph show deviations from the mean importance and satisfaction ratings given by respondents to the survey) mean importance Exceeded Expectations Continued Emphasis lower importance/higher satisfaction higher importance/higher satisfaction •Fire protection Emergency medical services• • City parks Garbage/trash pick-up services • • Police departmenV law enforcement Sewer services • Recycling services • Recreation programs\ Water services • Programs for youth • Traffic enforcement Building services • Code enforcement • • Communications Planning & zoning services Less Important Opportunities for Improvement lower importance/lower satisfaction higher importance/lower satisfaction • • • IiY7NAY�'/1M AA Q.J �'IMN • • • SourcPE�U s i uiee(LU14� Page 35 i, 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Section 4: Tabular Data ETC Institute (2014) Page 36 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Ol. The vision for the City of Meridian is as follows: "Meridian is a vibrant community whose vision is to be the premier City to live, work and raise a family." Several items that may influence your perception of Meridian as a community are listed below. Usin¢ a scale of 0 to 10. where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the City of Meridian in the following areas. (N=514) ETC Institute (2014) Page 37 Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Poor Don'tknow Q1 a. As a place to live 30.5% 18.3% 28.6% 12.6% 5.3% 2.3% 0.0% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 1.2% Q1b.Asaplace towork 11.7% 9.5% 13.2% 11.9% 10.3% 6.4% 3.5% 1.8% 0.6% 0.2% 0.8% 30.2% Qlc. As a place to raise a family 28.8% 22.2% 23.0% 12.3% 2.9% 2.3% 0.8% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.2% Qld. As a place to start/do business 8.2% 9.3% 13.4% 10.7% 7.2% 5.6% 3.3% 2.3% 1.8% 0.0% 0.4% 37.7% Qle. As a City that is building a strong sense of community 17.1% 15.0% 18.7% 14.8% 13.2% 9.3% 3.5% 2.7% 0.6% 0.8% 0.6% 3.7% Qlf. As a City that is developing a strong local economy 12.5% 12.3% 19.4% 15.1% 10.2% 10.0% 5.5% 2.5% 1.4% 0.4% 0.6% 10.2% Q1 g. As a City that is developing a strong local workforce that can compete in today's economic climate 7.2% 8.4% 14.4% 13.8% 13.4% 10.5% 5.4% 4.5% 1.4% 1.4% 1.04; 18.7% Qlh. As a City that is planning for future growth & development 15.0% 13.6% 19.5% 13.2% 10.3% 8.6% 4.5% 3.5% 2.5% 0.8% 2.1"t. 6.4% ETC Institute (2014) Page 37 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 01. The vision for the City of Meridian is as follows: "Meridian is a vibrant community whose vision is to be the premier City to live, work and raise a family." Several items that may influence your perception of Meridian as a community are listed below. Usin¢ a scale of 0 to 10. where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the City of Meridian in the following areas. ETC Institute (2014) Page 38 Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Poor Don't know Qli. As a City that is developing a sustainable & conscious environment 11.5% 13.6% 18.5% 13.0% 12.3% 10.3% 3.3% 2.7% 1.6% 0.8% 1.4% 11.1% Qlj. How well City is protecting quality of air &water 11.9% 11.1% 18.3% 13.6% 10.1% 8.9% 2.9% 2.9% 1.2% 0.6% 1.0% 17.5% Qlk. How well City is maintaining high quality neighborhoods 12.1% 14.6% 20.9% 18.6% 11.7% 8.6% 2.7% 2.1% 2.5% 0.6% 0.8% 4.7% Q1 I. How well City is providing options for mobility other than driving 3.7% 2.3% 8.4% 9.7% 9.7% 12.6% 10.5% 7.8% 7.4% 6.4% 10.1% 11.3% Qlm. How well City is ensuring public safety 11.7% 18.1% 21.4% 18.3% 8.0% 9.7% 3.1% 1.8% 1.8% 0.4% 0.8% 4.9% Qln. How well City is assisting in improving vibrancy & quality of Downtown Meridian 8.6% 10.7% 16.2% 17.3% 13.3% 12.3% 4.7% 3.9% 3.3% 1.6% 1.8% 6.4% Qlo. How well City is communicating with community 9.0% 10.9% 17.7% 17.9% 11.1% 12.9% 6.4% 3.7% 35"-" 1 '- 11"-" 37"-" ETC Institute (2014) Page 38 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Ol. The vision for the City of Meridian is as follows: "Meridian is a vibrant community whose vision is to be the premier City to live, work and raise a family." Several items that may influence your perception of Meridian as a community are listed below. Usin¢ a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the City of Meridian in the following areas. (Without "don't know") (N=514) Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Poor Q1 a. As a place to live 30.9% 18.5% 28.9% 12.8% 5.3% 2.4% 0.0% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% Q1b.Asaplace towork 16.7% 13.6% 18.9% 17.0% 14.8% 9.2% 5.0% 2.5% 0.8% 0.3% 1.1% Qlc. As a place to raise a family 31.0% 23.9% 24.7% 13.2% 3.1% 2.5% 0.8% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Qld. As a place to start/do business 13.1% 15.0% 21.6% 17.2% 11.6% 9.1% 5.3% 3.8% 2.8% 0.0% 0.6% Qle. As a City that is building a strong sense of community 17.8% 15.6% 19.4% 15.4% 13.7% 9.7% 3.6% 2.8% 0.6% 0.8% 0.6% Ql f. As a City that is developing a strong local economy 13.9% 13.7% 21.6% 16.8% 11.3% 11.1% 6.1% 2.8% 1.5% 0.4% 0.7% Ql g. As a City that is developing a strong local workforce that can compete in today's economic climate 8.9% 10.3% 17.7% 17.0% 16.5% 12.9% 6.7% 5.5% 1.7% 1.7% 1.2% Ql h. As a City that is planning for future growth & development 16.0% 14.6% 20.8% 14.1% 11.0% 9.1% 4.8% 3.7% 2.7% 0.8% 2.3% Qli. As a City that is developing a sustainable & conscious environment 12.9% 15.3% 20.8% 14.7% 13.8% 11.6% 3.7% 3.1% 1.8% 0.9% 1.5% Qlj. How well City is protecting quality of air & water 14.4% 13.4% 22.2% 16.5% 12.3% 10.8% 3.5% 3.5% 1.4% 0.7% 1.2% Qlk. How well City is maintaining high quality neighborhoods 12.7% 15.4% 21.9% 19.5% 12.3% 9.0% 2.9% 2.3% 2.7% 0.6% 0.8% ETC Institute (2014) Page 39 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 01. The vision for the City of Meridian is as follows: "Meridian is a vibrant community whose vision is to be the premier City to live, work and raise a family." Several items that may influence your perception of Meridian as a community are listed below. Using a scale of 0 to 10. where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the City of Meridian in the following areas. (Without "don't know") Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 Ol Poor Q1 I. How well City is providing options for mobility other than driving 4.2% 2.6% 9.4% 11.0% 11.0% 14.3% 11.8% 8.8% 8.3% 7.2% 11.4% Qlm. How well City is ensuring public safety 12.3% 19.1% 22.5% 19.3% 8.4% 10.2% 3.3% 1.8% 1.8% 0.4% 0.8% Qln. How well City is assisting in improving vibrancy & quality of Downtown Meridian 9.2% 11.5% 17.3% 18.5% 14.2% 13.1% 5.0% 4.2% 3.5% 1.7% 1.9% Q1 o. How well City is communicating with community 9.3% 11.3% 18.4% 18.6% 11.5% 13.4% 6.7% 3.8% 2.6% 1.8% 2.4% ETC Institute (2014) Page 40 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 02. While the City is not the sole contributor to your quality of life, it is important to understand the perceptions residents have of the quality of life in Meridian. Usin¢ a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "greatly exceeds my expectations" and 0 means "does not meet my expectations at all," please rate the City and its partners in the following areas. (N=514) ETC Institute (2014) Page 41 Greatly Exceeds My Expectations 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Does Not Meet My Expectations At All Don't Know Q2a. Overall quality of life in City 12.9% 20.9% 29.0% 18.7% 8.2% 5.8% 1.0% 1.4% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 1.8% Q2b. Overall quality of City services provided 10.7% 17.5% 23.2% 21.8% 10.1% 7.4% 2.7% 1.6% 0.6% 0.4% 0.8% 3.3% Q2c. Overall quality of customer service you receive from City employees 14.0% 17.3% 17.9% 14.4% 6.6% 5.4% 2.5% 1.2% 1.2% 0.6% 0.6% 18.3% Q2d. Your view of an ideal place to live 16.4% 21.6% 21.8% 17.9% 8.6% 8.6% 1.0% 1.2% 0.2% 0.6% 0.6% 1.6% ETC Institute (2014) Page 41 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 02. While the City is not the sole contributor to your quality of life, it is important to understand the perceptions residents have of the quality of life in Meridian. Usin¢ a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "greatly exceeds my expectations" and 0 means "does not meet my expectations at all," please rate the City and its partners in the following areas. (Without "don't know") (N=514) Does Not Meet My Expectations 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 At All 21.2% 29.6% 19.0% 8.3% 6.0% 1.0% 1.4% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 18.1% 23.9% 22.5% 10.5% 7.6% 2.8% 1.6% 0.6% 0.4% 0.8% 21.2% Greatly 17.6% Exceeds My 6.7% Expectations Q2a. Overall 1.4% quality of life in City 13.1% Q2b. Overall 22.2% quality of City 8.7% services provided 11.1% Q2c. Overall 0.2% quality of 0.6% customer service you receive from City employees 17.1% Q2d. Your view of an ideal place to live 16.6% Does Not Meet My Expectations 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 At All 21.2% 29.6% 19.0% 8.3% 6.0% 1.0% 1.4% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 18.1% 23.9% 22.5% 10.5% 7.6% 2.8% 1.6% 0.6% 0.4% 0.8% 21.2% 21.9% 17.6% 8.1% 6.7% 3.1% 1.4% 1.4% 0.7% 0.7% 22.0% 22.2% 18.2% 8.7% 8.7% 1.0% 1.2% 0.2% 0.6% 0.6% ETC Institute (2014) Page 42 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 04. Usin¢ a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "stron¢ly a¢ree" and 0 means "stron¢ly disa¢ree." please rate your level of a¢reement with the followin¢. (N=514) ETC Institute (2014) Page 43 Strongly Strongly Agree 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 DisaPree Don't Know Q4a. Quality housing & a variety of options exist in Meridian 16.5% 17.5% 27.4% 18.1% 7.0% 6.0% 1.0% 1.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.2% 4.1% Q4b. Development in City enhances quality of life 15.2% 13.4% 24.3% 19.1% 10.3% 8.4% 2.5% 1.4% 0.8% 1.0% 0.6% 3.1% Q4c. There are a variety of employment opportunities in Meridian 3.9% 6.8% 9.9% 16.0% 11.7% 12.3% 6.0% 5.8% 3.1% 1.2% 2.3% 21.0% Q4d. Access to quality shopping & entertainment exist in Meridian 21.6% 20.4% 23.3% 14.8% 6.8% 5.4% 2.3% 1.6% 1.0% 0.6% 0.8% 1.4% Q4e. City is managing growth wisely 7.2% 9.1% 17.1% 18.1% 11.5% 11.1% 4.7% 4.9% 2.7% 2.9% 3.7% 7.0% Q4f. Meridian has a sense of community 13.0% 13.6% 21.4% 16.5% 9.1% 11.7% 4.9% 2.1% 2.3% 1.2% 1.0% 3.1% Q4g. City continuously improves services 8.2% 11.1% 19.8% 18.3% 10.5% 10.9% 3.7% 2.5% 1.9% 0.2% 1.0% 11.9% Q4h. City uses your tax dollars wisely 6.4% 8.4% 13.8% 18.3% 11.7% 10.7% 3.5% 4.9% 2.5% 1.8% 2.7% 15.4% Q4i. City is headed in right direction 9.7% 15.2% 20.6% 18.7% 9.9% 10.1% 5.1% 2.1% 1.2% 1.4% 1.0% 5.1% ETC Institute (2014) Page 43 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 04. Usine a scale of 0 to 10. where 10 means "stronely aeree" and 0 means "stronely disaeree." please rate your level of aereement with the followin¢. (Without "don't know") (N=514) Strongly 08 Agree Q4a. Quality housing & a variety of 05 options exist in Meridian 17.2% Q4b. Development in City 01 enhances quality of life 15.7% Q4c. There are a variety of 18.9% employment opportunities in Meridian 4.9% Q4d. Access to quality shopping & 1.4% entertainment exist in Meridian 21.9% Q4e. City is managing growth wisely 7.7% Q4f. Meridian has a sense of community 13.5% Q4g. City continuously improves services 9.3% Q4h. City uses your tax dollars wisely 7.6% Q4i. City is headed in right direction 10.2% Strongly 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Disaaree 18.3% 28.6% 18.9% 7.3% 6.3% 1.0% 1.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.2% 13.9% 25.1% 19.7% 10.6% 8.6% 2.6% 1.4% 0.8% 1.0% 0.6% 8.6% 12.6% 20.2% 14.8% 15.5% 7.6% 7.4% 3.9% 1.5% 3.0% 20.7% 23.7% 15.0% 6.9% 5.5% 2.4% 1.6% 1.0% 0.6% 0.8% 9.8% 18.4% 19.5% 12.3% 11.9% 5.0% 5.2% 2.9% 3.1% 4.0% 14.1% 22.1% 17.1% 9.4% 12.0% 5.0% 2.2% 2.4% 1.2% 1.0% 12.6% 22.5% 20.8% 11.9% 12.4% 4.2% 2.9% 2.2% 0.2% 1.1% 9.9% 16.3% 21.6% 13.8% 12.6% 4.1% 5.7% 3.0% 2.1% 3.2% 16.0% 21.7% 19.7% 10.5% 10.7% 5.3% 2.3% 1.2% 1.4% 1.0% ETC Institute (2014) Page 44 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 05. If you own a home in Meridian, 29% of your total property tax bill goes to the City of Meridian to fund the City's operating budget for police, fire and narks services. Relating to services and facilities in the City of Meridian, using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "definitely getting my money's worth" and 0 means "definitely not getting my money's worth," please rate the value you feel you are getting for City tax dollars and fees. G5a Value received for City tax & fees Number Percent Definitely Getting My Money's Worth 59 11.5% 09 57 11.1 % O8 118 23.0% 07 111 21.6% 06 48 9.3% 05 42 8.2% 04 13 2.5% 03 9 1.8% 02 8 1.6% 01 1 0.2% Definitely Not Getting My Money's Worth 9 1.8% Total 514 100.0% 05. If you own a home in Meridian. 29% of your total property tax bill goes to the City of Meridian to fund the City's operating budget for police, fire and parks services. Relating to services and facilities in the City of Meridian, using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "definitely getting my money's worth" and 0 means "definitely not getting my money's worth," please rate the value you feel you are getting for City tax dollars and fees. (Without "don't know") G5a Value received for City tax & fees Number Percent Definitely Getting My Money's Worth 59 12.4% 09 57 12.0% O8 118 24.8% 07 111 23.4% 06 48 10.1% 05 42 8.8% 04 13 2.7% 03 9 1.9% 02 8 1.7% 01 1 0.2% Definitely Not Getting My Money's Worth 9 1.9% Total 475 100.0% ETC Institute (2014) Page 45 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 06. Usin¢ a scale of 0 to 10 where 10 means "very zood value" and 0 means "very poor value." alease rate the value that you feel you receive for Meridian's City Utility services. (N=514) 06. Usin¢ a scale of 0 to 10 where 10 means "very zood value" and 0 means "very poor value." alease rate the value that you feel you receive for Meridian's City Utility services. (Without "don't know") (N=514) Very Good Q6a. Value received for City water services 19.1% Q6b. Value received for City sewer services 20.6% Q6c. Residential trash collection services 23.1% Q6d. Curbside recycling services 25.2% Very Poor 14.4% Very Good 21.4% 8.4% 8.8% 2.1% 2.7% 1.4% 0.6% 1.6% 15.2% Very Poor 20.6% 7.6% Value 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Value Don't Know Q6a. Value received 1.0% 0.4% 1.2% 19.7% 20.4% 16.4% 5.7% 5.7% 2.1% 1.7% 1.1% 0.6% for City water services 18.1% 13.6% 18.5% 20.3% 8.0% 8.4% 1.9% 2.5% 1.4% 0.6% 1.6% 5.1% Q6b. Value received for City sewer services 19.5% 14.5% 20.7% 19.5% 7.2% 6.6% 1.8% 2.0% 1.6% 0.4% 1.2% 5.1% Q6c. Residential trash collection services 22.5% 20.5% 20.1% 17.2% 5.9% 5.7% 2.1% 0.8% 1.0% 0.4% 1.2% 2.7% Q6d. Curbside recycling services 23.4% 18.4% 18.9% 15.2% 5.3% 5.3% 2.0% 1.6% 1.0% 0.6% 1.4% 7.0% 06. Usin¢ a scale of 0 to 10 where 10 means "very zood value" and 0 means "very poor value." alease rate the value that you feel you receive for Meridian's City Utility services. (Without "don't know") (N=514) Very Good Q6a. Value received for City water services 19.1% Q6b. Value received for City sewer services 20.6% Q6c. Residential trash collection services 23.1% Q6d. Curbside recycling services 25.2% Very Poor 14.4% 19.5% 21.4% 8.4% 8.8% 2.1% 2.7% 1.4% 0.6% 1.6% 15.2% 21.8% 20.6% 7.6% 7.0% 1.9% 2.1% 1.6% 0.4% 1.2% 21.1% 20.7% 17.7% 6.0% 5.8% 2.2% 0.8% 1.0% 0.4% 1.2% 19.7% 20.4% 16.4% 5.7% 5.7% 2.1% 1.7% 1.1% 0.6% 1.5% ETC Institute (2014) Page 46 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 07. Usin¢ a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "Poor," Please rate the quality of the followin¢ City services. (N=514) Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 O1 Poor Don't Know Q7a. Emergency medical services 21.0% 19.1% 14.8% 10.5% 3.3% 2.5% 0.6% 0.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 27.4% Q7b. Fire protection 25.5% 21.8% 15.8% 9.7% 3.5% 2.5% 0.2% 0.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 20.2% Q7c. Police department/law enforcement 20.8% 21.4% 22.0% 13.4% 5.3% 2.9% 1.8% 1.9% 0.8% 0.6% 0.4% 8.8% Q7d. Code enforcement 9.3% 10.3% 14.4% 9.7% 5.4% 8.0% 4.3% 3.1% 1.4% 0.4% 1.9% 31.7% Q7e. Traffic enforcement 11.1% 14.0% 17.7% 17.0% 8.4% 9.2% 2.3% 3.3% 2.9% 1.0% 2.3% 10.7% Q7f. Planning & zoning services 6.0% 6.6% 15.0% 11.5% 9.0% 8.6% 2.7% 3.9% 2.3% 1.8% 4.1% 28.5% Q7g. Building services 6.6% 7.0% 13.8% 10.3% 5.8% 8.2% 1.4% 1.8% 1.4% 1.2% 1.4% 41.2% Q7h. Sewer services 14.6% 15.4% 22.8% 16.1% 5.1% 7.0% 1.0% 1.2% 1.0% 1.0% 0.8% 14.2% Q7i. Water services 15.8% 15.2% 21.2% 16.1% 7.0% 7.4% 2.1% 2.1% 1.8% 0.6% 0.2% 10.5% Q7j. Garbage/trash pick-up services 22.0% 21.8% 23.0% 15.0% 4.7% 5.1% 1.0% 1.2% 1.2% 0.6% 1.2% 3.5% Q7k. Recycling services 20.8% 20.2% 19.6% 14.2% 4.3% 7.0% 1.9% 1.8% 1.6% 0.4% 1.8% 6.4% Q71. City parks 30.7% 23.3% 20.4% 9.5% 3.7% 5.1% 1.0% 0.8% 0.8% 0.6% 0.2% 3.9% Q7m. Recreation programs 15.4% 14.4% 15.8% 12.7% 7.2% 4.9% 2.1% 2.3% 1.2% 0.4% 0.4% 23.2% Q7n. Programs for youth 12.6% 12.1% 13.8% 12.8% 7.0% 4.5% 1.6% 2.5% 1.8% 0.4% 0.4% 30.5% Q7o. Communications 9.7% 12.5% 14.2% 16.0% 8.0% 8.9% 5.1% 4.7% 2.5% 1.2% 1.2% 16.1% ETC Institute (2014) Page 47 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 07. Usine a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," alease rate the quality of the followine City services. (Without "don't knot% "1 (N=514) Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Poor Q7a. Emergency medical services 29.0% 26.3% 20.4% 14.5% 4.6% 3.5% 0.8% 0.8% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Q7b. Fire protection 32.0% 27.3% 19.8% 12.2% 4.4% 3.2% 0.2% 0.7% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Q7c. Police department/ law enforcement 22.8% 23.5% 24.1% 14.7% 5.8% 3.2% 1.9% 2.1% 0.9% 0.6% 0.4% Q7d. Code enforcement 13.7% 15.1% 21.1% 14.2% 8.0% 11.7% 6.3% 4.6% 2.0% 0.6% 2.8% Q7e. Traffic enforcement 12.4% 15.7% 19.9% 19.0% 9.4% 10.3% 2.6% 3.7% 3.3% 1.1% 2.6% Q7f. Planning & zoning services 8.4% 9.3% 21.0% 16.1% 12.5% 12.0% 3.8% 5.4% 3.3% 2.5% 5.7% Q7g. Building services 11.3% 11.9% 23.5% 17.5% 9.9% 13.9% 2.3% 3.0% 2.3% 2.0% 2.3% Q7h. Sewer services 17.0% 17.9% 26.5% 18.8% 5.9% 8.2% 1.1% 1.4% 1.1% 1.1% 0.9% Q7i. Water services 17.6% 17.0% 23.7% 18.0% 7.8% 8.3% 2.4% 2.4% 2.0% 0.7% 0.2% Q7j. Garbage/trash pick-up services 22.8% 22.6% 23.8% 15.5% 4.8% 5.2% 1.0% 1.2% 1.2% 0.6% 1.2% Q7k. Recycling services 22.2% 21.6% 21.0% 15.2% 4.6% 7.5% 2.1% 1.9% 1.7% 0.4% 1.9% Q71. City parks 32.0% 24.3% 21.3% 9.9% 3.8% 5.3% 1.0% 0.8% 0.8% 0.6% 0.2% Q7m. Recreation programs 20.1% 18.8% 20.6% 16.5% 9.4% 6.3% 2.8% 3.0% 1.5% 0.5% 0.5% Q7n. Programs for youth 18.2% 17.4% 19.9% 18.5% 10.1% 6.4% 2.2% 3.6% 2.5% 0.6% 0.6% Q7o. Communications 11.6% 14.8% 16.9% 19.0% 9.5% 10.7% 6.0% 5.6% 3.0% 1.4% 1.4% ETC Institute (2014) Page 48 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 08. Which THREE of the City Services listed in Ouestion 7 do you think should receive the most emphasis from City leaders over the next TWO years? Emergency medical services 19 3.7% Fire protection 12 2.3% Police department/law enforcement 71 13.8% Code enforcement 20 3.9% Traffic enforcement 47 9.1% Planning & zoning services 96 18.7% Building services 6 1.2% Sewer services 7 1.4% Water services 23 4.5% Garbage/trash pick-up services 7 1.4% Recycling services 26 5.1 % City parks 32 6.2% Recreation programs 17 3.3% Programs for youth 34 6.6% Communications 22 4.3% Total 514 100.0% 08. Which THREE of the City Services listed in Ouestion 7 do you think should receive the most emphasis from City leaders over the next TWO vears? Emergency medical services 15 2.9% Fire protection 39 7.6% Police department/law enforcement 40 7.8% Code enforcement 23 4.5% Traffic enforcement 42 8.2% Planning & zoning services 53 10.3% Building services 11 2.1% Sewer services 8 1.6% Water services 19 3.7% Garbage/trash pick-up services 10 1.9% Recycling services 26 5.1 % City parks 35 6.8% Recreation programs 22 4.3% Programs for youth 51 9.9% Communications 22 4.3% M514 0 Institute (2014) Page 49 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 08. Which THREE of the City Services listed in Ouestion 7 do you think should receive the most emphasis from City leaders over the next TWO years? Emergency medical services 20 3.9% Fire protection 12 2.3% Police department/law enforcement 42 8.2% Code enforcement 27 5.3% Traffic enforcement 31 6.0% Planning & zoning services 28 5.4% Building services 20 3.9% Sewer services 8 1.6% Water services 10 1.9% Garbage/trash pick-up services 9 1.8% Recycling services 21 4.1% City parks 36 7.0% Recreation programs 35 6.8% Programs for youth 47 9.1% Communications 41 8.0% Total 514 100.0% 08. Which THREE of the City Services listed in Ouestion 7 do you think should receive the most emphasis from City leaders over the next TWO years? (Sum of top 3 choices) 08. Sum of top 3 choices Number Percent Emergency medical services 54 10.5% Fire protection 63 12.3% Police department/law enforcement 153 29.8% Code enforcement 70 13.6% Traffic enforcement 120 23.3% Planning & zoning services 177 34.4% Building services 37 7.2% Sewer services 23 4.5% Water services 52 10.1% Garbage/trash pick-up services 26 5.1 % Recycling services 73 14.2% City parks 103 20.0% Recreation programs 74 14.4% Programs for youth 132 25.7% Communications 85 16.5% M Institute (2014) 1328 Page 50 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Q9. There are a variety of functions or services which are performed in Meridian by other governmental entities, agencies or groups as their Primary function or through a contract with the City. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the following aspects of our community. (N=514) Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Poor Don't know Q9a. Public transportation services contracted with Valley Regional Transit 1.4% 1.9% 2.1% 6.0% 6.2% 11.3% 3.7% 5.1% 6.2% 3.5% 8.4% 44.1% Q9b. Animal control contracted with Idaho Humane Society 7.2% 6.8% 13.4% 11.7% 7.6% 11.1% 2.9% 3.1% 2.3% 1.0% 2.3% 30.5% Q9c. Programs for seniors at Meridian Senior Center 4.3% 5.5% 8.8% 6.8% 3.3% 4.5% 1.9% 1.4% 1.0% 0.8% 0.8% 61.0% Q9d. K-12 education by Joint School District No.2 8.8% 7.4% 12.8% 11.9% 10.3% 9.5% 4.5% 4.7% 4.1% 1.6% 2.9% 21.6% Q9e. Lakeview Golf Course 3.7% 3.9% 6.0% 6.2% 3.3% 4.5% 0.8% 1.2% 1.0% 0.4% 1.8% 67.3% Q911 Library services by Meridian Library District 21.2% 20.7% 20.9% 12.5% 4.5% 5.5% 1.6% 0.8% 0.2% 0.6% 0.2% 11.5% Q9g. Bringing new jobs to area with Boise Valley Economic Partnership 3.3% 5.4% 6.4% 9.5% 8.9% 7.8% 4.1% 4.3% 3.1% 1.8% 3.5% 41.8% ETC Institute (2014) Page 51 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 09. There are a variety of functions or services which are performed in Meridian by other governmental entities, agencies or groups as their primary function or through a contract with the City. Usin¢ a scale of 0 to 10. where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor." please rate the following aspects of our community. (Without "don't know") (N=514) Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Poor Q9a. Public transportation services contracted with Valley Regional Transit 2.4% 3.5% 3.8% 10.8% 11.1% 20.2% 6.6% 9.1% 11.1% 6.3% 15.0% Q9b. Animal control contracted with Idaho Humane Society 10.4% 9.8% 19.3% 16.8% 10.9% 16.0% 4.2% 4.5% 3.4% 1.4% 3.4% Q9c. Programs for seniors at Meridian Senior Center 11.0% 14.0% 22.5% 17.5% 8.5% 11.5% 5.0% 3.5% 2.5% 2.0% 2.0% Q9d. K-12 education by Joint School District No.2 11.2% 9.4% 16.4% 15.1% 13.2% 12.2% 5.7% 6.0% 5.2% 2.0% 3.7% Q9c. Lakeview Golf Course 11.3% 11.9% 18.5% 19.0% 10.1% 13.7% 2.4% 3.6% 3.0% 1.2% 5.4% Q911 Library services by Meridian Library District 24.0% 23.3% 23.6% 14.1% 5.1% 6.2% 1.8% 0.9% 0.2% 0.7% 0.2% Q9g. Bringing new jobs to area with Boise Valley Economic Partnership 5.7% 9.4% 11.0% 16.4% 15.4% 13.4% 7.0% 7.4% 5.4% 3.0% 6.0% ETC Institute (2014) Page 52 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 010. The Ada County Highway District is the road authority for Ada County and the City of Meridian. State highways (Eagle Road, Meridian Road, and Chinden Boulevard) are operated by the Idaho Transportation Department. The City of Meridian works with these road providers to prioritize needed transportation related improvements in the community. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means 'boor." Dlease rate the following road -related aspects of our communitv. (N=514) Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Poor Don'tknow Q10a. Condition of roadway pavement in Meridian 6.6% 8.8% 22.4% 24.1% 12.6% 10.9% 4.9% 3.3% 1.2% 1.0% 2.7% 1.6% Q10b. Availability & condition of sidewalks 5.3% 8.6% 20.0% 19.8% 15.0% 11.9% 5.4% 5.1% 2.1% 1.6% 2.5% 2.7% Q10c. Management of traffic flow & congestion in Meridian 3.5% 5.1% 12.9% 15.2% 18.5% 11.3% 6.8% 7.6% 4.9% 4.5% 8.6% 1.2% Q10d. Adequacy of street lighting on arterial roadways 7.4% 8.9% 15.8% 21.4% 13.4% 11.1% 6.6% 5.8% 1.9% 1.0% 3.1% 3.5% Q1 Ge. Bike lanes on roads 4.9% 6.8% 10.9% 13.3% 12.3% 14.0% 8.0% 5.8% 5.1% 2.7% 5.8% 10.3% Q10f. Overall maintenance of street signs/ pavement markings 7.0% 12.5% 23.5% 20.4% 10.7% 12.5% 4.3% 2.9% 1.4% 1.4% 1.8% 1.8% ETC Institute (2014) Page 53 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 010. The Ada County Highway District is the road authority for Ada County and the City of Meridian. State highways (Eagle Road, Meridian Road, and Chinden Boulevard) are operated by the Idaho Transportation Department. The City of Meridian works with these road providers to prioritize needed transportation related improvements in the community. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the following road -related aspects of our community. (without "don't know") (N=514) Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Poor Q10a. Condition of roadway pavement in Meridian 6.7% 8.9% 22.7% 24.5% 12.8% 11.1% 4.9% 3.4% 1.2% 1.0% 2.8% Q10b. Availability & condition of sidewalks5.4% 8.8% 20.6% 20.4% 15.4% 12.2% 5.6% 5.2% 2.2% 1.6% 2.6% Q10c. Management of traffic flow & congestion in Meridian 3.6% 5.1% 13.0% 15.4% 18.7% 11.4% 6.9% 7.7% 4.9% 4.5% 8.7% Ql Od. Adequacy of street lighting on arterial roadways 7.7% 9.3% 16.3% 22.2% 13.9% 11.5% 6.9% 6.0% 2.0% 1.0% 3.2% QIOe. Bike lanes on roads 5.4% 7.6% 12.2% 14.8% 13.7% 15.7% 8.9% 6.5% 5.7% 3.0% 6.5% Ql Of Overall maintenance of street signs/pavement markings 7.1% 12.7% 24.0% 20.8% 10.9% 12.7% 4.4% 3.0% 1.4% 1.4% 1.8% ETC Institute (2014) Page 54 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 011. There area variety of projects which have been identified by the community as "desired" amenities, some of which the City has limited to no involvement in making them happen. In addition, the City has taken the position to save for future improvements and not bond for new facilities. Knowing this, which items would you like to see in Meridian using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "high priority" and 0 means "no priority." (N=514) High Priority 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 No Priority Don't Know Ql la. Add gym space for recreation programs 6.2% 5.4% 9.7% 9.9% 10.9% 14.8% 5.4% 5.3% 5.1% 3.3% 11.3% 12.6% Ql lb. Constructing Linder Road overpass 18.9% 8.8% 13.5% 10.5% 9.2% 9.2% 4.5% 4.7% 3.1% 1.8% 7.2% 8.8% Ql lc. Building a composting facility for yard waste 11.3% 9.5% 13.0% 10.9% 8.8% 12.1% 8.0% 6.0% 4.9% 2.9% 5.6% 7.0% Ql Id. Redeveloping Downtown 11.9% 8.0% 14.4% 12.6% 11.1% 15.4% 6.8% 5.8% 2.1% 1.0% 5.4% 5.4% Ql le. Building a performing Arts Center 7.8% 5.1% 8.8% 11.5% 6.8% 13.8% 9.1% 8.6% 7.6% 4.5% 10.3% 6.2% Ql If Adding more bike lanes & pathways 17.3% 9.1% 14.0% 12.5% 9.9% 10.9% 4.3% 4.3% 4.3% 2.7% 5.4% 5.3% Ql lg. Providing more public transportation options 23.5% 11.1% 14.8% 13.4% 8.2% 8.2% 3.3% 2.1% 3.1% 2.5% 3.7% 6.0% Ql lh. Developing a pathway along rail corridor 10.4% 7.4% 12.1% 11.7% 7.6% 11.1% 5.3% 4.5% 4.5% 4.3% 6.8% 14.3% Ql li. Sports stadium & recreation venue 8.2% 6.4% 9.0% 9.4% 7.6% 14.2% 5.8% 7.2% 6.6% 6.0% 11.9% 7.6% ETC Institute (2014) Page 55 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 011. There area variety of projects which have been identified by the community as "desired" amenities, some of which the City has limited to no involvement in making them happen. In addition, the City has taken the position to save for future improvements and not bond for new facilities. Knowing this, which items would you like to see in Meridian using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "high priority" and 0 means "no Driorltv." (Without "dont know") (N=514) High Priority 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 No Priority Ql la. Add gym space for recreation programs 7.1% 6.2% 11.1% 11.4% 12.5% 16.9% 6.2% 6.0% 5.8% 3.8% 12.9% Qllb. Constructing Linder Road overpass20.7% 9.6% 14.7% 11.5% 10.0% 10.0% 4.9% 5.1% 3.4% 1.9% 7.9% Ql lc. Building a composting facility for yard waste 12.1% 10.3% 14.0% 11.7% 9.4% 13.0% 8.6% 6.5% 5.2% 3.1% 6.1% Q1Id. Redeveloping Downtown 12.6% 8.4% 15.2% 13.4% 11.7% 16.3% 7.2% 6.2% 2.3% 1.0% 5.8% Qlle. Building aperforming Arts Center 8.3% 5.4% 9.3% 12.2% 7.3% 14.7% 9.8% 9.1% 8.1% 4.8% 11.0% Ql if Adding more bike lanes & pathways 18.3% 9.7% 14.8% 13.1% 10.5% 11.5% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5% 2.9% 5.7% Ql lg. Providing more public transportation options 25.1% 11.8% 15.7% 14.3% 8.7% 8.7% 3.5% 2.3% 3.3% 2.7% 3.9% Ql lh. Developing a pathway along rail corridor 12.1% 8.7% 14.1% 13.7% 8.9% 13.0% 6.2% 5.2% 5.2% 5.0% 8.0% Ql Ii. Sports stadium & recreation venue 8.9% 7.0% 9.7% 10.1% 8.2% 15.4% 6.3% 7.8% 7.2% 6.5% 12.9% ETC Institute (2014) Page 56 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 012. The City has built much of its current park system through partnerships with developers and non-profit organizations. The City is considering a partnership approach with a non-profit organization that would help meet the City's need for gvm space for recreation Programs. Are you supportive of the City using this approach? 012. Supportive of City using a partnership approach Number Percent Yes 295 57.4% No 58 11.3% Not sure/not provided 161 31.3% Total 514 100.0% 013. The City uses a variety of methods to communicate with the public, including its website, social media such as Facebook and Twitter, traditional media such as newspapers, radio, and television, and a bi-weekly newsletter. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor." please rate the following communication services. (N=514) Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Poor Don't Know Q13a. Effectiveness of City communications with public 5.7% 9.9% 16.4% 15.6% 13.6% 12.7% 5.3% 5.5% 2.5% 1.2% 2.7% 9.0% Q13b. Opportunities for public involvement in local decision-making 5.1% 7.4% 14.0% 16.6% 9.2% 12.1% 5.1% 6.6% 2.3% 2.1% 2.3% 17.2% Q13c. Quality of www.meridiancity.org 7.2% 9.7% 14.6% 16.2% 5.8% 8.0% 3.9% 1.9% 1.0% 1.2% 1.4% 29.0% Q13d. Usefulness of online services available on City website 10.5% 11.7% 12.7% 9.6% 7.8% 7.6% 2.3% 1.2% 1.2% 1.0% 1.6% 32.9% Q13e. Quality of information about City programs & services 6.0% 11.7% 17.2% 14.8% 11.5% 9.2% 3.7% 4.3% 2.5% 0.8% 1.9% 16.4% ETC Institute (2014) Page 57 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 013. The City uses a variety of methods to communicate with the public, including its website, social media such as Facebook and Twitter, traditional media such as newspapers, radio, and television, and a bi-weekly newsletter. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the following communication services. (Without "don't know") (N=514) Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Poor Q1 3a. Effectiveness of City communications with public 6.2% 10.9% 18.0% 17.1% 15.0% 13.9% 5.8% 6.0% 2.8% 1.3% 3.0% Q1 3b. Opportunities for public involvement in local decision- making 6.1% 8.9% 16.9% 20.0% 11.1% 14.6% 6.1% 8.0% 2.8% 2.6% 2.8% Q13c. Quality of www. meridiancity.org 10.2% 13.7% 20.6% 22.8% 8.2% 11.3% 5.5% 2.7% 1.4% 1.6% 1.9% Q13d. Usefulness of online services available on City website 15.7% 17.4% 18.9% 14.2% 11.6% 11.3% 3.5% 1.7% 1.7% 1.5% 2.3% Q13e. Quality of information about City programs & services 7.2% 14.0% 20.5% 17.7% 13.8% 11.0% 4.4% 5.1% 3.0% 0.9% 2.3% ETC Institute (2014) Page 58 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 014. Where do You currently ¢et information about Meridian's services and nro¢rams? Q14. Where do you currently get information about City services & programs Number Percent City website 217 42.2% Facebook 50 9.7% Twitter 8 1.6% Television/news 257 50.0% Flyers in utility bills 288 56.0% Information booklets/City publications 99 19.3% Newspaper 215 41.8 % Radio 89 17.3% Emails from City 90 17.5% Events such as Coffee with the Mayor 13 2.5% Library 66 12.8 % Chamber of Commerce/Visitor Center 17 3.3% Other source 27 5.3% Total 014. Other source: 1449 WORD OF MOUTH 4 14.8% FRIENDS 3 11.1 % NONE, I DON"T GET INFORMATION 3 11.1 % INTERNET 2 7.4% MAIL 2 7.4% VALLEY TIMES 1 3.7% PEOPLE 1 3.7% PHONE BOOK 1 3.7% NOT PROVIDED 1 3.7% NEWSLETTER 1 3.7% NEIGHBORS 1 3.7% I LOOK ONLINE 1 3.7% NOT INTERESTED 1 3.7% WORK 1 3.7% FAMILY 1 3.7% WIFE 1 3.7% CALLING CITY HALL 1 3.7% NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION 1 3.7% Total 27 100.0% ETC Institute (2014) Page 59 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 015. How would you arefer to receive information about Meridian's services and nro¢rams? Q15. How would you prefer to receive information about City services & Programs Number Percent Texts 14 2.7% Entails 176 34.2% City's website 193 37.5% Social media 70 13.6% Mobile applications 45 8.8% Traditional media 231 44.9% Flyers in utility bills 246 47.9% City publications 113 22.0% Other sources 23 4.5% Total 015. Other source: 1125 015. Other Number Percent MAIL 5 26.0% NEWSLETTER 2 8.7% MAILERS 1 8.6% DIRECT MAIL 1 8.6% NONE 1 4.3% MERIDIAN PRESS 1 4.3% MAGAZINE 1 4.3% BOOK 1 4.3% MAIL AND NEWS 1 4.3% NOT PROVIDED 1 4.3% FLYERS 1 4.3% TRADITIONAL MAIL 1 4.3% NOT INTERESTED 1 4.3% WIFE 1 4.3% Total 23 100.0% ETC Institute (2014) Page 60 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 016. The City Parks and Recreation Department maintains 20 narks, provides 684 snorts leagues and recreation programs, holds 11 special events, and provides information using social media, seasonal activity ¢vides, and email updates. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the following parks and recreation services. (N=514) Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Poor Don't Know Q16a. Number of City parks 29.2% 17.5% 21.8% 12.8% 5.6% 3.9% 1.4% 1.4% 0.6% 0.2% 0.4% 5.3% Q16b. Quality, appearance & maintenance of City parks 29.8% 26.5% 20.8% 8.9% 4.7% 3.7% 0.4% 0.4% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 4.3% Q16c. Number of athletic fields 13.8% 16.6% 19.9% 12.9% 5.8% 4.7% 1.8% 1.9% 0.4% 0.4% 0.0% 21.8% Q16d. Quality of athletic fields 15.8% 16.8% 21.5% 12.5% 3.3% 4.7% 0.4% 1.6% 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% 22.9% Q16e. Number of special events & festivals 9.4% 9.6% 18.7% 14.4% 9.2% 13.5% 3.5% 3.7% 1.8% 0.2% 1.2% 15.0% Q1 6f. Quality & variety of special events & festivals 9.6% 9.2% 16.6% 14.3% 11.1% 11.3% 3.3% 3.9% 1.4% 0.6% 1.2% 17.6% Q16g. Number of pathways for walking & biking 7.2% 5.9% 12.9% 10.5% 12.9% 14.6% 8.0% 6.8% 4.5% 2.7% 2.1% 11.7% Q16h. Quality of pathways for walking & biking 9.8% 7.8% 18.9% 12.7% 9.6% 10.7% 5.7% 4.5% 2.7% 1.2% 1.8% 14.6% Q16i. Availability of parks/green space near your home 21.1% 14.2% 18.1% 9.9% 8.2% 9.2% 2.1% 3.3% 2.3% 2.5% 2.1% 6.8% ETC Institute (2014) Page 61 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 016. The City Parks and Recreation Department maintains 20 narks, provides 684 snorts leagues and recreation programs, holds 11 special events, and provides information using social media, seasonal activity guides, and email updates. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the following parks and recreation services. ETC Institute (2014) Page 62 Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 Ol Poor Don't Know Q16j. Availability of information about recreation programs & classes through social media, activity guides, email updates, website, & etc. 10.3% 11.1% 16.0% 10.9% 7.4% 9.9% 3.7% 5.1% 3.3% 2.3% 3.5% 16.5% Ql6k. Availability of community center & gym facilities 3.3% 5.3% 8.8% 9.1% 7.2% 13.6% 6.8% 6.4% 3.1% 1.6% 2.9% 31.9% Q161. Number of recreation programs & classes 5.8% 6.0% 12.5% 13.4% 6.8% 11.5% 5.1% 5.4% 2.5% 1.0% 1.4% 28.6% Q16m. Quality & variety of recreation programs & classes 5.1% 5.8% 12.1% 11.7% 7.6% 8.8% 3.9% 4.1% 2.1% 1.2% 1.2% 36.5% Q16n. Number of adult sports programs & sporting events 4.3% 4.5% 11.1% 9.0% 5.7% 9.9% 4.3% 3.1% 2.3% 0.6% 1.6% 43.7% Q1 6o. Quality of adult sports programs & sporting events 4.7% 5.3% 10.3% 8.8% 4.9% 8.6% 3.1% 1.6% 1.4% 0.4% 1.2% 50.0% Q16p. Ease of registering for recreational sports programs or classes 6.4% 6.3% 10.9% 8.4% 4.5% 8.0% 1.6% 2.0% 1.4% 0.6% 1 A% 48.6% ETC Institute (2014) Page 62 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 016. The City Parks and Recreation Department maintains 20 narks, provides 684 snorts leagues and recreation programs, holds 11 special events, and provides information using social media, seasonal activity ¢vides, and email updates. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the following parks and recreation services. Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Poor Don't Know Ql6q. Cost of recreational sports programs or classes 5.6% 5.8% 10.1% 9.7% 5.6% 7.0% 3.7% 1.4% 1.2% 0.8% 1.8% 47.3% Ql6r. Ease of registering for picnic shelter reservations 7.2% 7.0% 12.5% 8.0% 3.3% 4.1% 1.2% 1.9% 0.8% 0.2% 1.2% 52.6% Q16s. Availability of youth sports programs through partners 8.6% 11.7% 14.6% 9.5% 4.7% 7.0% 1.2% 1.0% 0.6% 0.8% 0.2% 40.3% Q16t. Quality of youth sports programs through partners 9.7% 10.5% 12.6% 9.5% 5.1% 5.8% 0.6% 1.4% 0.6% 0.4% 0.4% 43.4% ETC Institute (2014) Page 63 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 016. The City Parks and Recreation Department maintains 20 parks, provides 684 sports leagues and recreation programs, holds 11 special events, and provides information using social media, seasonal activity guides, and email updates. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the following parks and recreation services. (Without "don't know") (N=514) Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Poor Q16a. Number of City parks 30.8% 18.5% 23.0% 13.6% 6.0% 4.1% 1.4% 1.4% 0.6% 0.2% 0.4% Ql6b. Quality, appearance & maintenance of City parks 31.1% 27.6% 21.7% 9.3% 4.9% 3.9% 0.4% 0.4% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% Q16c. Number of athletic fields 17.7% 21.2% 25.4% 16.5% 7.5% 6.0% 2.2% 2.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.0% Q16d. Quality of athletic fields 20.5% 21.8% 27.8% 16.2% 4.3% 6.1% 0.5% 2.0% 0.5% 0.3% 0.0% Q16e. Number of special events & festivals 11.0% 11.2% 22.0% 17.0% 10.8% 15.8% 4.1% 4.4% 2.1% 0.2% 1.4% Q16f. Quality & variety of special events & festivals 11.6% 11.1% 20.1% 17.3% 13.5% 13.7% 4.0% 4.7% 1.7% 0.7% 1.4% Q16g. Number of pathways for walking & biking 8.2% 6.6% 14.6% 11.9% 14.6% 16.6% 9.1% 7.7% 5.1% 3.1% 2.4% Q16h. Quality of pathways for walking & biking 11.4% 9.2% 22.2% 14.9% 11.2% 12.6% 6.6% 5.3% 3.2% 1.4% 2.1% Q16i. Availability of parks/green space near your home 22.6% 15.3% 19.5% 10.7% 8.8% 9.8% 2.3% 3.6% 2.5% 2.7% 2.3% Q16j. Availability of information about recreation programs & classes through social media, activity guides, email updates, website, & etc. 12.4% 13.3% 19.1% 13.1% 8.9% 11.9% 4.4% 6.1% 4.0% 2.8% 4.2% Ql6k. Availability of community center & gym facilities 4.9% 7.7% 12.9% 13.4% 10.6% 20.0% 10.0% 9.4% 4.6% 2.3% 4.3% ETC Institute (2014) Page 64 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 016. The City Parks and Recreation Department maintains 20 narks, provides 684 snorts leagues and recreation programs, holds 11 special events, and provides information using social media, seasonal activity ¢aides, and email updates. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the following parks and recreation services. (Without "don't know") Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Poor Q161. Number of recreation programs & classes 8.2% 8.4% 17.4% 18.8% 9.5% 16.1% 7.1% 7.6% 3.5% 1.4% 1.9% Q16m. Quality & variety of recreation programs & classes 8.0% 9.2% 19.0% 18.4% 12.0% 13.8% 6.1% 6.4% 3.4% 1.8% 1.8% Q16n. Number of adult sports programs & sporting events 7.6% 8.0% 19.7% 15.9% 10.0% 17.6% 7.6% 5.5% 4.2% 1.0% 2.8% Q16o. Quality of adult sports programs & sporting events 9.3% 10.5% 20.6% 17.5% 9.7% 17.1% 6.2% 3.1% 2.7% 0.8% 2.3% Q1 6p. Ease of registering for recreational sports programs or classes 12.5% 12.2% 21.3% 16.3% 8.7% 15.6% 3.0% 3.8% 2.7% 1.1% 2.7% Ql6q. Cost of recreational sports programs or classes 10.7% 11.1% 19.2% 18.5% 10.7% 13.3% 7.0% 2.6% 2.2% 1.5% 3.3% Q16r. Ease of registering for picnic shelter reservations 15.2% 14.8% 26.3% 16.9% 7.0% 8.6% 2.5% 4.1% 1.6% 0.4% 2.5% Q1 6s. Availability of youth sports programs through partners 14.3% 19.5% 24.4% 16.0% 7.8% 11.7% 2.0% 1.6% 1.0% 1.3% 0.3% Q16t. Quality of youth sports programs through partners 17.2% 18.6% 22.3% 16.8% 8.9% 10.3% 1.0% 2.4% 1.0% 0.7% 0.7% ETC Institute (2014) Page 65 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 017. In the oast 12 months, have you or anyone in your household visited a City of Meridian nark? Q17. Have you or anyone in your household visited a City park in past 12 months Number Percent Yes, I have personally visited a City park last year 423 82.3% Yes, a household member has visited a City park last year 16 3.1 % No 75 14.6% Total 514 100.0% 017a. (If YES to Ouestion 17) How often did you or someone in v our household � isit a City nark? Q1 7a. How often did you or someone in your household visit a City park Number Percent Less than once a month 126 28.7% Once a month 82 18.7% 2-3 times a month 104 23.7% Once a week or more 107 24.4% Don't know 20 4.6% Total 439 100.0% 018. Thinkin¢ about the City of Meridian nark system, which would you rather see emphasized? 018. Which would you rather see emphasized Number Percent Development of large regional or community parks with a variety of amenities similar to Settlers Park/Julius M. Kleiner Park/Bear Creek Park 274 53.3% Development of more neighborhood parks similar to Champions Park/ Renaissance Park/Seasons Park with playground style amenities 211 41.1% Don't know 29 5.6% Total 514 100.0% ETC Institute (2014) Page 66 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 019. Do you have a workin¢ smoke detector in your home? 019. Do you have a working, smoke detector in your home Number Percent Yes 503 97.8% No 2 0.4% Don't know 9 1.8% Total 514 100.0% 020. The National Standard for the Fire Department to respond to an emer¢encv is 5 minutes or less 90% of the time from when the Department is alerted to a call. The City of Meridian's Fire Department currently responds to emer¢encies in 7 minutes or less 90% of the time and meets the national standard 56.6% of the time. Does this response time meet your level of service expectation? Q20. Does Fire Department response time meet your level of service expectation Number Percent Yes 360 70.0% No 139 27.0% Don't know 15 2.9% Total 514 100.0% ETC Institute (2014) Page 67 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 021. Public safety has prioritized public outreach using social media, public presentations. citizen academies, and volunteer opportunities like citizen park patrols. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent' and 0 means "Door." please rate the following public safety services. (N 514) Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Poor Don't Know Q21a. Overall feeling of safety in City 19.8% 26.7% 28.2% 13.8% 4.7% 2.7% 0.8% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 2.5% Q21b. Quality of local police protection 20.6% 25.5% 23.3% 11.9% 4.7% 2.7% 1.4% 1.8% 0.8% 0.0% 0.4% 7.0% Q21c. How quickly police respond to 911 emergencies 13.8% 11.5% 12.5% 5.4% 2.3% 2.5% 0.4% 1.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 49.8% Q21d. Visibility of police in neighborhoods 12.5% 14.2% 15.6% 16.0% 11.3% 9.1% 3.3% 5.6% 4.3% 1.8% 2.1% 4.3% Q21e. Safety in City parks 14.0% 21.2% 21.6% 15.4% 5.8% 4.9% 1.2% 0.4% 0.6% 0.4% 0.8% 13.8% Q2 If Police safety education programs 7.6% 9.5% 8.6% 6.6% 4.3% 3.9% 1.0% 1.2% 1.0% 0.6% 1.0% 54.9% Q21g. Professionalism of Employees responding to emergencies 16.9% 13.4% 14.0% 6.4% 2.1% 2.7% 0.4% 1.0% 0.4% 0.8% 0.6% 41.2% Q21h. Overall quality of local fire protection 20.2% 18.7% 17.9% 9.5% 3.5% 2.3% 0.8% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26.7% Q21i. How quickly fire rescue responds to 911 emergencies 16.9% 14.4% 12.8% 8.2% 2.5% 2.1% 0.6% 0.0% 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% 41.8% ETC Institute (2014) Page 68 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 021. Public safety has prioritized public outreach using social media, public presentations, citizen academies, and volunteer opportunities like citizen park patrols. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor." please rate the following public safety services. ETC Institute (2014) Page 69 Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Poor Don't Know Q21j. Quality of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 18.1% 14.6% 14.2% 7.2% 2.3% 1.4% 1.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 40.5% Q21k. Fire safety education programs 9.9% 9.9% 9.2% 7.2% 4.5% 3.9% 0.8% 0.8% 0.2% 0.4% 0.4% 52.8% Q211. Location of fire stations 22.0% 21.2% 22.8% 11.9% 5.3% 5.1% 1.6% 0.4% 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% 9.2% ETC Institute (2014) Page 69 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 21. Public safetv has prioritized public outreach usine social media. public presentations. citizen academies. and volunteer opportunities like citizen park patrols. Using a scale of 0 to 10. where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor." please rate the following public safety services. (Without "don't know") (N 514) Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Poor Q21a. Overall feeling of safety in City 20.4% 27.3% 28.9% 14.2% 4.8% 2.8% 0.8% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% Q21b. Quality of local police protection 22.2% 27.4% 25.1% 12.8% 5.0% 2.9% 1.5% 1.9% 0.8% 0.0% 0.4% Q21c. How quickly police respond to 911 emergencies 27.5% 22.9% 24.8% 10.9% 4.7% 5.0% 0.8% 2.3% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% Q21d. Visibility of police in neighborhoods 13.0% 14.8% 16.3% 16.7% 11.8% 9.6% 3.5% 5.9% 4.5% 1.8% 2.2% Q2 le. Safety in City parks 16.3% 24.6% 25.1% 17.8% 6.8% 5.6% 1.4% 0.5% 0.7% 0.5% 0.9% Q2 If Police safety education programs 16.8% 21.1% 19.0% 14.7% 9.5% 8.6% 2.2% 2.6% 2.2% 1.3% 2.2% Q21g.Professionalism of employees responding to emergencies 28.8% 22.8% 23.8% 10.9% 3.6% 4.6% 0.7% 1.7% 0.7% 1.3% 1.0% Q21h. Overall quality of local fire protection 27.6% 25.5% 24.4% 13.0% 4.8% 3.2% 1.1% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Q21i. How quickly fire rescue responds to 911 emergencies 29.1% 24.7% 22.1% 14.0% 4.3% 3.7% 1.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.3% 0.0% Q21j. Quality of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 30.4% 24.5% 23.9% 12.1% 3.9% 2.3% 1.6% 0.7% 0.0% 0.3% 0.3% Q211. Fire safety education programs 21.1% 21.1% 19.4% 15.3% 9.5% 8.3% 1.7% 1.7% 0.4% 0.8% 0.8% Q211. Location of fire stations 24.2% 23.4% 25.1% 13.1% 5.8% 5.6% 1.7% 0.4% 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% ETC Institute (2014) Page 70 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 22. Usinlz a scale of 0 to 10. where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "Door." please rate the Citv's efforts in the enforcement of the following codes and ordinances. (N=514) Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Poor Don't Kno Q22a. Weed abatement 5.6% 8.6% 13.8% 13.0% 10.3% 9.5% 5.4% 5.1% 3.7% 1.6% 3.9% 19.5% Q22b. Removal of graffiti 13.8% 14.4% 19.1% 11.9% 3.5% 7.4% 1.2% 0.6% 1.2% 1.0% 0.8% 25.3% Q22c. Abandoned/ 17.1% 16.2% 12.8% 11.8% 6.8% 6.3% 4.6% 1.9% 4.8% Q22b. Removal of graffiti 18.5% 19.3% junk automobile removal 8.9% 13.2% 15.0% 11.9% 4.5% 6.8% 3.3% 4.9% 1.4% 1.6% 1.9% 26.7% Q22d. Clean-up of removal 12.2% 18.0% 20.4% 16.2% litter & debris on 9.3% 4.5% 6.6% 1.9% 2.1% 2.7% Q22d. Clean-up of litter & debris on private property 5.8% 8.6% 14.0% 12.5% 8.0% 6.6% 4.9% 5.4% 2.5% 2.5% 3.7% 25.5% Q22e. Dilapidated 7.3% 3.4% 3.4% 5.0% Q22e. Dilapidated houses or buildings 6.1% 11.6% 19.6% 16.9% 8.5% 13.5% 6.6% houses or buildings 4.5% 8.6% 14.4% 12.5% 6.2% 9.9% 4.9% 4.7% 2.5% 2.5% 2.9% 26.3% Q22f. Illegal dumping 6.4% 7.6% 13.8% 8.8% 5.6% 5.1% 2.9% 2.7% 1.6% 1.0% 2.1% 42.4% 22. Usinlz a scale of 0 to 10. where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "Door." Dlease rate the Citv's efforts in the enforcement of the following codes and ordinances. (Without "don't know") (N 514) Excellent 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 Poor Q22a. Weed abatement 7.0% 10.6% 17.1% 16.2% 12.8% 11.8% 6.8% 6.3% 4.6% 1.9% 4.8% Q22b. Removal of graffiti 18.5% 19.3% 25.5% 15.9% 4.7% 9.9% 1.6% 0.8% 1.6% 1.3% 1.0% Q22c. Abandoned/junk automobile removal 12.2% 18.0% 20.4% 16.2% 6.1% 9.3% 4.5% 6.6% 1.9% 2.1% 2.7% Q22d. Clean-up of litter & debris on private property 7.8% 11.5% 18.8% 16.7% 10.7% 8.9% 6.5% 7.3% 3.4% 3.4% 5.0% Q22e. Dilapidated houses or buildings 6.1% 11.6% 19.6% 16.9% 8.5% 13.5% 6.6% 6.3% 3.4% 3.4% 4.0% Q22f. Illegal dumping 11.1% 13.2% 24.0% 15.2% 9.8% 8.8% 5.1% 4.7% 2.7% 1.7% 3.7% ETC Institute (2014) Page 71 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 023. Some neighborhoods have a great "sense of community." People know their neighbors form Neighborhood Watch Programs or have block parties and truly think of the others in the same area as "neighbors." Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means a "very strop¢ sense of community" and 0 means "no sense of community at all," please rate the sense of community in your neighborhood. 023a. Ratine, of "sense of community" in your neighborhood Number Percent Very Strong Sense of Community 60 11.7% 09 50 9.7% O8 84 16.3% 07 95 18.5% 06 55 10.7% 05 57 11.1 % 04 24 4.7% 03 25 4.9% 02 19 3.7% 01 14 2.7% No Sense of Community At All 8 1.6% Total 514 100.0% 23. Some neiehborhoods have a creat "sense of communitv." People know their neilzhbors form Neilzhborhood Watch Prolzrams or have block parties and truly think of the others in the same area as "neighbors." Using a scale of 0 to 10. where 10 means a "very strong sense of communitv" and 0 means "no sense of communitv at all." please rate the sense of communitv in vour neilzhborhood. (without "don't know" 023a Rating of "sense of community" in your neighborhood Number Percent Very Strong Sense of Community 60 12.2% 09 50 10.2% O8 84 17.1% 07 95 19.3% 06 55 11.2% 05 57 11.6% 04 24 4.9% 03 25 5.1 % 02 19 3.9% 01 14 2.9% No Sense of Community At All 8 1.6% Total 491 100.0% ETC Institute (2014) Page 72 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 024. The City and its community partners have been focused on Downtown redevelopment such as enhancing signage, adding kiosks with information, and community events. Did you visit Downtown at least once during the past year? 024. Did you visit Downtown at least once during past year Number Percent Yes 437 85.0% No 67 13.0% Don't remember 10 1.9% Total 514 100.0% 024x. Of YES to Ouestion 24) What was the nature of your visit or visits to Downtown? 024a. What was the nature of your visit or visits to Downtown Number Percent Leisure 335 76.7% Business 158 36.2% Cultural event 25 5.7% City Hall 110 25.2% Shopping 146 33.4% Festival, parade, or other event 93 21.3% Other 21 4.8% Total p24a. Other 898 POST OFFICE 3 23.9% CHURCH 2 9.5% YOUTH RANCH 1 4.8% MOVIES 1 4.8% PLAY/STAGE 1 4.8% HAIR CUT 1 4.8% GENESIS SERVICE DOGS, OUTING/TRAINING 1 4.8% BARBERSHOP 1 4.8% NOT PROVIDED 1 4.8% LOVE TREASURE VALLEY! 1 4.8% PARKS/RECREATION CLASS 1 4.8% BANK 1 4.8% DOCTORS 1 4.8% FUEL 1 4.8% FARMERS MARKET 1 4.8% LOOKING FOR INFORMATION 1 4.8% Total 21 100.0% ETC Institute (2014) Page 73 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 024b. (If YES to Question 24) How many times did you visit Downtown Meridian for purposes other than work? Q24b. How many times did you visit Downtown for purposes other than work Number Percent Less than 5 times 153 35.0% 5 to 10 times 120 27.5% 11 to 20 times 55 12.6% 20+ times 95 21.7% Don't know 14 3.2% Total 437 100.0% 024c. (If YES to Ouestion 24) When you think about your visits to Downtown o%er the last year, how satisfied were you with your overall experience? 024c. How satisfied were you with your overall experience Number Percent Very satisfied 135 30.9% Somewhat satisfied 123 28.1% Neutral 116 26.5% Somewhat dissatisfied 29 6.6% Very dissatisfied 27 6.2% Don't know 7 1.6% Total 437 100.0% ETC Institute (2014) Page 74 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 025. Name THREE things You would like to see added or increased in Downtown Meridian. (Item 1) SHOPPING 31 9.3% PARKING 29 8.7% RESTAURANTS 19 5.7% BIKE LANES 5 1.5% FARMERS MARKET 5 1.5% TRANSPORTATION 3 0.9% TRAFFIC FLOW 2 0.6% NOTHING 2 0.6% PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 2 0.6% FAMILY FRIENDLY ENTERTAINMENT 1 0.3% CITYHALL 1 0.3% UPKEEP IN OLDER NEIGHBORHOODS 1 0.3% MORE 1 0.3% DOWNTOWN 1 0.3% BETTER BIKING 1 0.3% PERFORMING ARTS CENTER I 0.3% BETTER TRAFFIC CONTROL I 0.3% BEAUTIFUL CITY HALL; OLD RUNDOWN DOWNTOWN I 0.3% PROGRAMS I 0.3% MORE FLASHING YELLOW TURN LIGHTS I 0.3% MORE STOPS FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION I 0.3% BAKERY I 0.3% A BETTER SENSE OF WHO MERIDIAN IS- A BETTER IDENTITY I 0.3% IT'S ALL THERE - JUST A VERY BIG CITY TO GET TO IT ALL 1 0.3% CONTINUATION OF THE COOL LIGHTSAND SIDE LIKE AROUND MERIDIAN IS SO SPREAD OUT.NEUTRAL W/WHAT YOU DO W/ COMMUNITY CENTER WITH ASSISTANCE FOR COMMUNITY CLEAN UP TRAFFIC MESS 1 0.3% UPSCALE RESTAURANTS 1 0.3% BETTER TRAFFIC ON PINE AND MAIN. 1 0.3% BETTER EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES. 1 0.3% BETTER PARKING SIGNAGE 1 0.3% ETC Institute (2014) Page 75 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 025. Name THREE things You would like to see added or increased in Downtown Meridian. (Item 1) LANDSCAPE 1 0.3% CITY HALL BLDG. RENTALS ENCOURAGED. 1 0.3% BIKE ACCESS 1 0.3% NICER BUILDINGS/REMOVAL OF OLD EYE SORE HOUSES & BUSINESSES 1 0.3% STOP LIGHT FOR W BROADWAY AND MERIDIAN RD 1 0.3% MORE CAFES 1 0.3% BUSINESSES 1 0.3% BETTER PUBLIC LIBRARY - VERY WEAK 1 0.3% INTERESTING, LOCAL (NOT FRANCHISE) SHOPS AND RESTAURANTS 1 0.3% FACELIFT TO THE OUTSIDE APPEARANCE OF BUILDINGS 1 0.3% NOTHING - ONLY MAKES TAXES GO UP 1 0.3% MORE FLOWERS I 0.3% BETTER STREETS I 0.3% THE ONE WAY ST SHOULD HAVE BEEN ALL THE WAY THRU TOWN I 0.3% FIX THE TRAFFIC FLOW. TOO HARD TO GET AROUND. I 0.3% MORE VIABLE BUSINESS I 0.3% DINING SELECTIONS I 0.3% I AM HAPPY AND SATISFIED WITH DOWNTOWN MERIDIAN I 0.3% BETTER PARKING AREAS I 0.3% ENTERTAINMENT AREAS - INSIDE AND OUT 1 0.3% EASIER ACCESS -NO ONE-WAY STREETS 1 0.3% MORE BUSINESSES OTHER THAN RESTAURANTS 1 0.3% UPDATE BUILDINGS 1 0.3% ENTERTAINMENT 1 0.3% SEE #26 BELOW 1 0.3% BE MORE PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY 1 0.3% BETTER TRAFFIC FLOW 1 0.3% EVERYDAY FARMERS MARKET 1 0.3% STILL USE OLD DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY CENTER 1 0.3% MORE STREET CAFES 1 0.3% BUILDING VACANCIES FILLED 1 0.3% MORE USEFUL RETAIN (NOT MUCH TO DRAW PEOPLE OTHER THAN REST 1 0.3% CAN'T THINK OF ANYTHING? 1 0.3% ETC Institute (2014) Page 76 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 025. Name THREE things You would like to see added or increased in Downtown Meridian. (Item 1) COMMERCE 1 0.3% DAIRY PARADE TO RETURN 1 0.3% SIDEWALK APPEAL - FACADE RENOVATION 1 0.3% DELI 1 0.3% DON'T KNOW 1 0.3% TEENS PROGRAMS 1 0.3% SMALL BUSINESS SHOPPING 1 0.3% MORE WALKING/BIKING PATHS 1 0.3% I'M NOT SURE. I'M SORRY. 1 0.3% MORE EVENTS! BLUES/JAZZ FESTIVAL, ART WALK, 1 ST THURS 1 0.3% A SATURDAY MARKET 1 0.3% FINE DINING 1 0.3% MORE MUSIC EVENTS/PERFORMING ARTS CENTER 1 0.3% ROADS THAT ALLOW BI-PASSING(AND EASE CONGESTION) BUSY ROADS 1 0.3% NOTHING THAT DRAWS MY FAMILY DWNTWN SO WE HAVE NO IDEAS 1 0.3% MORE BUSINESSES OPENING UP 1 0.3% LESS CONGESTION FOR TRAFFIC 1 0.3% MORE FAMILY TYPE BUSINESSES 1 0.3% BETTER POST OFFICE ACCESS 1 0.3% GREENBELT/MORE BIKE PATHS 1 0.3% IMPROVED TRAFFIC FLOW 1 0.3% BE MEMBERS OF YMCA WEST 1 0.3% THE OLD ARCHITECTURED BUILDING MADE SAFE AND USED 1 0.3% INDOOR SWIMMING POOL WITH TIMES FOR SENIORS AND ADULTS 1 0.3% RECYCLING FOR GLASS 1 0.3% BETTER TRAFFIC PATTERN 1 0.3% FOOD 1 0.3% UPDATING/MODERNIZING 1 0.3% MORE BUSINESSES - RESTAURANTS, SHOPS, ETC. 1 0.3% VISIBILITY FROM SIDE ROADS TO MAIN/MERIDIAN ROADS 1 0.3% URBAN RENEWAL 1 0.3% INCREASED OPPORTUNITIES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE. 1 0.3% ETC Institute (2014) Page 77 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 025. Name THREE things You would like to see added or increased in Downtown Meridian. (Item 1) A TRUE CENTER FOR OUR TOWN 1 0.3% DRIVER'S LICENSE RENEWAL 1 0.3% BUSINESS 1 0.3% MORE BIKE LANES 1 0.3% REVITALIZATION 1 0.3% PEDESTRIAN AREA 1 0.3% A TRUE FARMER'S MARKET 1 0.3% MORE TREES/BUSHES 1 0.3% MAYBE A TROLLEY TO TRAVEL ON THE MAIN STREETS. HOPON&OFF! 1 0.3% BIGGER FARMER'S MARKET 1 0.3% SPEND LESS MONEY ON CITY BLDGS.SPACE&TAX DOLLARS ARE WASTED 1 0.3% BUS SERVICE - MERIDIAN TO BOISE, BOISE TO MERIDIAN 1 0.3% CHANGE OF TRAFFIC LANES AT MAIN&FAIRVIEW OUT OF SHOPPING CTR 1 0.3% OUTDOOR SEATING ON STREETS AND GREEN SPACES 1 0.3% VENUETHATACCOMMEARGEGROUPSOFPEOPLE FOR CABLEONE NITES, ETC. 1 0.3% MORE COOL SHOPS AND RESTAURANTS, BETTER PUBS. 1 0.3% HANDICAP AWARENESS SIGN ON TOILETS & DRESSING ROOMS 1 0.3% SYNCHRONIZED LIGHTS FOR THRU TRAFFIC! 1 0.3% SIDEWALKS 1 0.3% PARKING FOR MORE BUSINESS ACCESS. 1 0.3% MORE WALK TO SHOPS 1 0.3% PROMANADE 1 0.3% ENHANCEMENTS TO LIBRARY 1 0.3% FABRIC STORE OR QUILT SHOP 1 0.3% PUBLIC RESTROOMS 1 0.3% ART SHOWS - ACTIVITIES - MARKETS - ETC 1 0.3% CITY EVENTS SUCH AS 1 0.3% BUSINESS/COMMERICAL GROWTH 1 0.3% DEVELOP MORE COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL EVENTS 1 0.3% MASS TRANSPORTATION ON BUS SERVICES 1 0.3% I LIKE THE USE OF FLAGS BY PEDESTRIANS AT INTERSECTIONS 1 0.3% DOWNTOWN MERIDIAN IS ECLECTIC &SOMEWHAT HAPHAZARD LOOKING 1 0.3% ETC Institute (2014) Page 78 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 025. Name THREE things You would like to see added or increased in Downtown Meridian. (Item 1) CHANGE TO REGULAR TRAFFIC BACK TO 2 WAY (VERY CONFUSING) 1 0.3% THE GROTTO SHOULD TURN INTO A CUTE PUBLIC COFFEE SHOP! 1 0.3% BIKEIWALKING LANES 1 0.3% WALKABILITY 1 0.3% MORE PARKIWALKING AREAS 1 0.3% NOTHING-DWNTWNS ARE OVER-RATED.DON'T WASTE TIME IMPROVING IT I 0.3% SHOPPING AND BUSINESS; RESTAURANTS I 0.3% LARGER STREET NAME SIGNS I 0.3% PLACES TO HAVE COFFEE AND MEET PEOPLE I 0.3% MORE SPECIALITY SHOPS I 0.3% SPORTS STADIUM I 0.3% ADD TRUSTWORTHY GOVERNMENT LEADERS I 0.3% STREET SIGNAGE COULD BE BETTER I 0.3% DOWNTOWN BUSINESSES NEED TO IMPROVE TH EIR LOOK- MOREPAINTETC I 0.3% CAR FREE WALKING AREAS I 0.3% MORE SMALL BUSINESSES - SHOPPING I 0.3% A MORE I 0.3% AN EVENT CENTER (SMALL CONCERTS) I 0.3% TACO TUESDAY, DUH! I 0.3% RETURN OF DOWNTOWN URBAN MARKET. ALIVE AFTER 5 TYPE ACTIVITY I 0.3% BETTER TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - VERY CONFUSING COMING IN FRM I84 0.3% ACTIVITIES I 0.3% CLASSES FOR SENIORS I 0.3% WELCOMING AND INVITING ENVIRONMENT AND ATMOSPHERE - SUCH AS BIKE LANES I 0.3% FOOD 0.3% APPEARANCE- CLEAN I 0.3% NOTHING -THIS SHOULD NOT BE A MAIN FOCUS I 0.3% NEED JOBS I 0.3% BIKEPATHS OR BIKE LANES SO CAN RIDE BIKE FROM HOME TO DOWNTOWN 1 0.3% BENCHES I 0.3% MORE DINING OPTIONS I 0.3% ETC Institute (2014) Page 79 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 025. Name THREE things You would like to see added or increased in Downtown Meridian. (Item 1) IMPROVED PUBLIC EDUCATION 1 0.3% PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION --EASIER ACCESS TO IT, NOT JUST AT THE FREEWAY. 1 0.3% BUSINESSES 1 0.3% APPEARANCE AND DEFINITION OF 1 0.3% INCREASED SIGNAGE 1 0.3% BETTER TRAFFIC FLOW 1 0.3% VENUE'S AND EVENTS LIKE I 0.3% TRANSIT AROUND MERIDIAN I 0.3% CONCERTS ON BROADWAY (MORE OF THEM) I 0.3% MORE UPSCALE RESTAURANTS I 0.3% SMOKE-FREE BARS I 0.3% NO IDEA I 0.3% BOUTIQUES FOR CLOTHING, SHOES, ETC. ADDED. I 0.3% MORE POLICE PRESENCE IN SUBDIVISIONS I 0.3% MORE PARKS I 0.3% REFURBISH OLD BUILDINGS I 0.3% I RARELY SEE DOWNTOWN GIVEN THE NEW TRAFFIC PATTERN. I 0.3% PUBLIC TRANSPORT/SHUTTLE FROM SUBURBAN NEIGHBORHOOD/CORNERS TO DOWNTOWN MERIDIAN. EVEN IF ON WEEKEND I 0.3% SAFER BICYCLE ACCESS I 0.3% SAFE WALK WAYS - LIKE THE GREEN BELT I 0.3% CAN'T THINK OF ANY 1 0.3% FAMILY ACTIVITIES 1 0.3% IMPROVED ROADS -LIGHTS 1 0.3% UNIQUE ETHNIC, REASONABLY PRICED RESTAURANTS 1 0.3% SHADE TREES 1 0.3% LEFT TURN SIGNALS 1 0.3% TOY STORE 1 0.3% ETC Institute (2014) Page 80 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 025. Name THREE things You would like to see added or increased in Downtown Meridian. (Item 1) BENCHES ALONG THE SIDEWALKS 1 0.3% MORE EATING ESTABLISHMENTS 1 0.3% NEW BUSINESSES (OFFICES, RETAIL SHOPS) 1 0.3% CLUBS 1 0.3% A MOVIE THEATRE 1 0.3% FIENDLIER RESPONSE FROM WATER DEPARTMENT. LATE ONE TIME = WATER BEING SHUT OFF= NOT USER FRIENDLY. 1 0.3% ADD TACO BELL 1 0.3% A GREEN AREA ALONG THE RAILROAD TRACKS 1 0.3% REFACING CURRENT BUILDINGS AND ADD PUBLIC ART DISPLAYS TO CREATE AN MODERN, INVITING DOWNTOWN. 1 0.3% LIVE MUSIC, OUTDOOR EVENTS 1 0.3% STREET LIGHTS 1 0.3% A MORE EFFICIENT AND FRIENDLIER POST OFFICE I 0.3% RESTORATION OF OLDER HISTORICAL BUILDINGS I 0.3% MORE NICE RESTAURANTS I 0.3% REASON TO GO THERE I 0.3% SIDEWALKS I 0.3% SPORTS STADIUM I 0.3% ROAD CLOSURES AND DETOURS COORDINATED BETTER I 0.3% MORE DINING I 0.3% SPORTS STADIUM/ARENA, SUCH AS FOR PRO BASEBALL 1 0.3% SOME CENTRAL POINT OF FOCUS LIKE THE VILLAGE 1 0.3% BETTER BIKE PATHS, CONTINUOUS, CONSISTENT AND SAFER 1 0.3% OUTDOOR RESTAURANTS 1 0.3% CLEAN UP AROUND THE RAILROAD TRACKS THROUGH TOWN 1 0.3% BUS SERVICE TO AND FROM 1 0.3% WE ARE IN OUR MID TO LATE 80S, STAY CLEAN AND BUSINESSES 1 0.3% COFFEE SHOPS 1 0.3% BUILDING REFURBISHMENT/OLD TOWN 1 0.3% DESTINATION 1 0.3% EVENTS THAT WOULD BRING MORE PEOPLE TO THAT AREA OF TOWN 1 0.3% TRADER JOE'S 1 0.3% NOTHING, STOP SPENDING. IT'S FINE. 1 0.3% SPEED SIGNS POSTED MORE CLEARLY 1 0.3% ETC Institute (2014) Page 81 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 025. Name THREE things You would like to see added or increased in Downtown Meridian. (Item 1) DAIRY DAYS PARADE 1 0.3% SPORTS STADIUM ADJACENT TO DOWNTOWN 1 0.3% NOT SURE, BUT MAINTAIN WHAT THEY HAVE. 1 0.3% LESS CONGESTION 1 0.3% REDEVELOP THE ABANDONED BUILDINGS 1 0.3% MORE SMALL BUSINESS 1 0.3% STOREFRONTS - WOULD LIKE TO KEEP THE OLD ONES I 0.3% COMMUNITY PARK WITH THINGS FOR CHILDREN I 0.3% MORE RECREATION PROGRAMS FOR THE YOUTH. AFFORDABLE. I 0.3% MORE CONCERTS OR FESTIVALS TO DRAW PEOPLE DOWNTOWN I 0.3% ANOTHER POST OFFICE I 0.3% NEWSPAPER I 0.3% OUTDOOR DINING I 0.3% MORE ENTERTAINMENT I 0.3% ROAD PLANNING I 0.3% MORE SENIOR SPOTS I 0.3% CORPORATE BUSINESSES I 0.3% MORE COMMUNITY CHAIRS AND FOUNTAINS I 0.3% FINISH THE OVERPASS I 0.3% EXPAND THE DOWNTOWN AREA I 0.3% MORE FOOD AREAS I 0.3% STOP CHANGING TRAFFIC ROUTE 1 0.3% MORE TREES AND FLOWERS 1 0.3% NEEDS A PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT 1 0.3% Total 330 100.0% ETC Institute (2014) Page 82 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 025. Name THREE things You would like to see added or increased in Downtown Meridian. (Item 2) PARKING 26 10.4% RESTAURANTS 15 6.0% SHOPPING 15 6.0% PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 2 0.8% BIKE LANES 2 0.8% MORE BIKE LANES 2 0.8% COMMUNITY CENTER 2 0.8% MORE TREES ALONG MAIN ESPECIALLY FROM I84 TO FRANKLIN 1 0.4% FAMILY FRIENDLY RESTAURANTS 1 0.4% MORE FESTIVALS 1 0.4% LESS TIME BETWEEN LEFT TURN LIGHTS I 0.4% STREETS I 0.4% DON'T KEEP CHANGING FLOW OF TRAFFIC I 0.4% SATURDAY FARMERS MARKET I 0.4% DMV DRIVER'S LICENSE OFFICE. BENJAMIN IS A PAIN! I 0.4% PLAN FOR ROAD DEVELOPMENT (COMPREHENSIVE). I 0.4% REAL JOBS (DECENT PAY, ADVANCED COLLEAGE DEGREE, NOT SERV) I 0.4% BETTER ROADS WITH LESS CONSTRUCTION TIME&DONE RIGHT 1ST TIME 0.4% A REASON TO I 0.4% ABILITY TO VISIT BUSINESSES I 0.4% MORE COMMUNITY FUNCTIONS 1 0.4% BETTER HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE RESTROOMS 1 0.4% TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 0.4% NEW 1 0.4% OUTDOOR CAFES 1 0.4% MORE SMALL STORES 1 0.4% RECREATION FACILITY - SMALL ARENA RODEO SIZE 1 0.4% DOG PARK 1 0.4% SENSE OF SMALL TOWN COMMUNITY 1 0.4% SOMETHING FOR KIDS 1 0.4% ETC Institute (2014) Page 83 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 025. Name THREE things You would like to see added or increased in Downtown Meridian. (Item 2) NO SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT 1 0.4% I LEFT LOS ANGELES, CA TO COME TO MERIDIAN WHICH WAS LIKE 1 0.4% WHERE IS 1 0.4% EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES 1 0.4% PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION THAT IS EASY AND CONVENIENT 1 0.4% PARK SPACE/RECREATIONAL AREAS 1 0.4% COMEDY CLUB I 0.4% STOP WORKING ON ROADS. PINE ST SHOULDN'T BE CLOSED AT ALL. 0.4% DINING I 0.4% PANERA BREAD CO I 0.4% NO BUSES ON MAIN STREETS I 0.4% DAIRYLAND PARADE NEEDS TO COME BACK I 0.4% HARDWARE I 0.4% ENTERTAINMENT VENUE I 0.4% COFFEE SHOP I 0.4% BIGGER MODERN PLACES FOR COFFEE,INTERNET AND PUBLIC SHOPS 1 0.4% SMALL BUSINESS RESTAURANTS 1 0.4% CONTINUE SUPPORTING SMALL BUSINESS/SHOPS 1 0.4% EVENT CENTER 1 0.4% A GREEN BELT TYPE PATH CONNECTING ALL PARTS OF DOWNTOWN 1 0.4% MORE UNIQUE STORES/SHOPS 1 0.4% MORE ATTRACTIVE MAIN ST 1 0.4% MAJOR FACE LIFTS TO SOME PLACES.DWNTWN PARK IS VERY OUTDATED 1 0.4% EAGLE ROAD GOES TO 6 LANES 3/3 1 0.4% MORE PARADES OR FESTIVALS FOR FAMILIES/CHILDREN 1 0.4% PUBLIC/LOCAL TRANSPORTATION 1 0.4% MUSEUMS/ART GALLERIES, ETC 1 0.4% STREET FESTIVALS 1 0.4% UPKEEP ON BUILDINGS 1 0.4% SAFELY MARKED BIKE PATHS CONNECTING TO MAJOR BIKE PATHS 1 0.4% EVENT AREA 1 0.4% ETC Institute (2014) Page 84 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 025. Name THREE things You would like to see added or increased in Downtown Meridian. (Item 2) A SENIOR CENTER FOR OUR TOWN 1 0.4% SHERRIFF'S OFFICE ACCESS 1 0.4% LEISURE 1 0.4% MORE ENTERTAINMENT 1 0.4% MORE BUSINESSES TO ATTRACT PEDESTRIANS 1 0.4% UPDATED SIGNAGE FOR SOME OF THE BUSINESSES 1 0.4% A SENIOR GATHERING LOCATION I 0.4% MORE POLICE FORCE I 0.4% BUS STOPS/PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION I 0.4% BIKE LANES/PATHS I 0.4% MORE BUSINESSES SELLING FOOD AND BEVERAGES I 0.4% BETTER TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. I 0.4% ART GALLERY FOCUS ON YOUNG ADULT/TEEN SHOWINGS I 0.4% IMPROVED APPEARANCE I 0.4% NEED TO CLEAN UP THE JUNKY NEIGHBORHOODS OF TRASH AND JUNK. I 0.4% THERE IS A FINE IF YOU ARE NOT LEGALLY HANDICAP 1 0.4% LOCAL VENDOR/FARMERS MARKET 1 0.4% CLEAN UP WEEDS! 1 0.4% MORE SMALL BUSINESS. 1 0.4% FAMILY FRIENDLY ATTRACTIONS 1 0.4% MUSIC FESTIVAL 1 0.4% BETTER COMMUNICATION ABOUT EVENTS 1 0.4% SIDEWALKS 1 0.4% PARKS 1 0.4% MORE SMALL BUSINESS (NON -FRANCHISE) DEVELOPMENT 1 0.4% MORE BIKE ACCESS 1 0.4% KEEP IT AS CLEAN AS IT IS NOW 1 0.4% SUMMER FLOWERS 1 0.4% BIKE PATHS/PARKS 1 0.4% WHEN MONEY&OPPORTUNITY PRESENTS ITSELF, GET RID OF OLD RUN DOWN BLDGS 1 0.4% TRAFFIC LAWS ENFORCED/ANIMAL CONTROL - BARKING, HARASSMENT 1 0.4% FLORAL POTS/PLANTERS FOR TREES 1 0.4% RAISE SPEED LIMIT ON MAIN STREET TO 35MPH LIKE MERIDIAN 1 0.4% SIDEWALK 1 0.4% ETC Institute (2014) Page 85 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 025. Name THREE things You would like to see added or increased in Downtown Meridian. (Item 2) VISUAL IMPROVEMENT OF OLD BUILDINGS -INCREASE OCCUPANCY 1 0.4% CLEARER VISIBILITY OF STREET NAME SIGNS 1 0.4% KEEP THE POST OFFICE GOING 1 0.4% ARTS/MUSIC 1 0.4% COSTCO 1 0.4% HOLD LEADERS ACCOUNTABLE 1 0.4% ADDRESS NUMBERS ON BUSINESS BUILDINGS NEED IMPROVEMENT 1 0.4% FESTIVAL AND OTHER EVENTS 1 0.4% SOUTH MERIDIAN YMCA WITH POOL -I MEAN NEIGHBORING W/ CITY HALL 1 0.4% ART GALLERY/PHOTO GALLERY FOR LOCAL ARTISTS 1 0.4% MORE BIKING PATHWAYS ON ROAD! 1 0.4% CLEAN PROGRESSIVE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT -PROMOTION! 1 0.4% TRAFFIC FLOW IMPROVEMENT 1 0.4% OUTDOOR RENTAL (BIKE, SKATES, ETC.) 1 0.4% TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT I 0.4% TRAFFIC NOT SO CHAOTIC I 0.4% TRANSPORTAION I 0.4% COHESIVE VISUAL & STRUCTURAL LOOK THAT COMMUNICATES IDENTITY I 0.4% APPEAL OF STORES & BUSINESSES I 0.4% CLEAN UP THE OLD BUILDINGS I 0.4% FLOWERS IN SUMMER, HOLIDAY LIGHTS IN WINTER I 0.4% UPDATED BUILDINGS I 0.4% IMPROVED PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION I 0.4% CITY NEEDS TO HELP BUSINESS ADVERTISE - I DON'T KNOW WHAT BUSINESSES ARE AVAILABLE IN DOWNTOWN MERIDIAN 1 0.4% FAMILY EVENTS 1 0.4% A REASON TOGO DOWNTOWN. WITH THE VILLAGE BUILT, I HAVE WHAT I NEED AT THE VILLAGE. 1 0.4% A 24-HOUR PEDESTRIAN ONLY STREET WITH NO'ZONING' REGULATIONS WHATSOEVER 1 0.4% PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY (DON'T NEED ORANGE FLAGS) 1 0.4% MORE ROOM AND ACCOMMODATIONS FOR BIKE TRAFFIC AND PARKING ETC DOWNTOWN 1 0.4% ETC Institute (2014) Page 86 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 025. Name THREE things You would like to see added or increased in Downtown Meridian. (Item 2) TRANSIT TO BOISE 1 0.4% BETTER TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 0.4% TEARING DOWN 1 0.4% MARKETING DOWNTOWN BUSINESSES TO INCREASE ACTIVITY 1 0.4% NATURAL FOOD STORE ADDED. 1 0.4% REVIEW OF SEWER FEE'S VERSUS FRESH WATER USAGE. 1 0.4% BETTER LANDSCAPING I 0.4% OUTDOOR DINING OPTIONS I 0.4% PUBLIC INDOOR SWIMMING I 0.4% MORE LANDSCAPING/GREEN SPACE I 0.4% I RARELY SEE DOWNTOWN GIVEN THE NEW TRAFFIC PATTERN. I 0.4% BIG FARMERS MARKET. ONE MID WEEK AND ONE WEEKEND. I 0.4% SAFE BIKING AREAS - LIKE THE GREEN BELT I 0.4% YOUNG ADULT ACTIVITIES I 0.4% LESS TRAFFIC I 0.4% OUTDOOR GATHERING PLACE IN NICE WEATHER I 0.4% PUBLIC RESTROOMS (7) I 0.4% SMALL BUSINESS PROMOTION I 0.4% BOUTIQUES I 0.4% PRESERVE HISTORICAL HERITAGE I 0.4% SENIOR CENTER I 0.4% BIKE LANES 1 0.4% TROLLEY GOING UP AND DOWN MAIN STREET ON THE WEEKENDS 1 0.4% FINE DINNING 1 0.4% HOUSING 1 0.4% MORE EMPHASIS ON OUTDOOR PLACES TO EAT AND THINGS TO DO WITH ADULT FRIENDS. VILLAGE WAS NICE ADDITION. 1 0.4% LESS STOPLIGHTS 1 0.4% ADD WINCO 1 0.4% MORE TOURIST SHOPS 1 0.4% INCREASE SHOPPING OPTIONS TO DRAW A BIGGER AUDIENCE AND SUSTAIN THE RESTAURANTS CURRENTLY IN PLACE. 1 0.4% MAYBE AN ADDITIONAL POST OFFICE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE FREEWAY 1 0.4% MORE SPECIALTY SHOPS 1 0.4% ETC Institute (2014) Page 87 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 025. Name THREE things You would like to see added or increased in Downtown Meridian. (Item 2) BENCHES TO SIT ON, I AM AN AMPUTEE, AND THAT WOULD BE NICE 1 0.4% MORE PARADES, EVENTS 1 0.4% BETTER/MORE RESTAURANT/BAR OPTIONS 1 0.4% RECREATION VENUE 1 0.4% MORE GREEN AREAS AND/OR PARKS 1 0.4% COMMUNICATION ON WHEN EVENTS ARE HAPPENING, I.E. DAIRY DAYS 1 0.4% MORE YOUTH PROGRAMS DOWNTOWN 1 0.4% BENCHES, PLACES TO WALK 1 0.4% NEW BUSINESSES ON EMPTY, WEED RIDDEN LOTS 1 0.4% A DOWNTOWN PARK 1 0.4% MAINTAIN CLEAN AND INVITING PROPERTIES 1 0.4% SPECIALITY (SPA, SALON) 1 0.4% RESTORATION 1 0.4% BETTER WALKWAYS 1 0.4% REAL ICE RINK 1 0.4% PLACES TO RIDE BIKESIWALK PATH 1 0.4% BUSINESS INCUBATOR (?) - LARGE BUSINESS 1 0.4% OUTSIDE DINING 1 0.4% LESS CONSTRUCTION 1 0.4% GETTING LIGHTS TO ACTIVATE - EAST, WEST 1 0.4% MAKE USE OF BUILDINGS THAT ARE NOT BEING USED 1 0.4% LARGE FARMERS MARKET DOWNTOWN 1 0.4% MORE GREEN SPACE 1 0.4% CONTINUE MUSIC FESTIVALS/EVENTS AT CITY HALL 1 0.4% MORE DIVERSE RESTAURANTS 1 0.4% TRAFFIC FLOW (GOOD) 1 0.4% MORE CHRISTMAS DECOR 1 0.4% FESTIVALS 1 0.4% HOTELS 1 0.4% ANOTHER BASKIN ROBBINS 1 0.4% MORE RESTAURANTS W/OUTDOOR DINING 1 0.4% DOG PARKS 1 0.4% MORE BOUTIQUES 1 0.4% RECREATION 1 0.4% RECYCLING BINS 1 0.4% NEEDS AN IDENTITY - RECOGNIZE SIZE OF CITY 1 0.4% Total 249 100.0% ETC Institute (2014) Page 88 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 025. Name THREE things You would like to see added or increased in Downtown Meridian. (Item 3) MORE SHOPPING 11 6.1% RESTAURANTS 7 3.9% PARKING 6 3.3% FESTIVALS 2 1.1 % EVENTS 2 1.1 % INFORMATION SIGNS 1 0.6% DEVELOPMENT/IMPROVEMENTS W/O LOSING #2 I 0.6% CONCERTS I 0.6% MUSEUM OR OTHER PUBLIC ATTRACTION I 0.6% CITY PARK I 0.6% BIKE LANES I 0.6% FAMILY FRIENDLY SHOPS I 0.6% LESS ONE WAY STREETS I 0.6% INTERACTION I 0.6% MAKE RT HAND TURN LANE FROM MAIN TO PINE. I 0.6% RESIDENCES/BUSINESSES ON PINE NEED TO BE CLEANED UP I 0.6% NO NEW MAYOR AND SOME NEW CITY COUNCILMEN. I 0.6% CASUAL DINING (NOT CHAINS BUT NOT EXPENSIVE/FORMAL) I 0.6% BLDGS I 0.6% BUSINESS ON THE WEST SIDE I 0.6% MORE PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY I 0.6% OUTDOOR VENUE FOR EVENTS 1 0.6% BEER GARDENS AND BETTER FIREWORKS 1 0.6% REBUILD TRAIN STATION 1 0.6% NO BIG BOX STORES! 1 0.6% HISTORICAL CENTER 1 0.6% PARKS 1 0.6% MORE TREES 1 0.6% THE DEVOFAGAREAS HAS TAKEN AWAY SMALLTOWN FEEL 1 0.6% BIGGER BUSINESSES 1 0.6% ADDRESS VEHICULAR TRF THAT DISCOURAGESPEDESTRIAN BETTER BUSINESSES. (NOT INEVELENT BUSINESSES WITH POOR MOVING TO MAYBERRY RD. IMPROVED TRAFFIC FLOW 1 0.6% PEDESTRIAN ZONE 1 0.6% FARMERS MARKET 1 0.6% MORE CULTURAL EVENTS 1 0.6% TRADER JOES 1 0.6% ETC Institute (2014) Page 89 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 025. Name THREE things You would like to see added or increased in Downtown Meridian. (Item 3) A DIVERSE BUSINESS DISTRICT 1 0.6% MORE OUTDOOR SPACE IN DWNTWN-GENERATION PLAZAISN'T BIGENOUGH 1 0.6% BAKERY 1 0.6% PUBLIC SERVICES, SUCH AS, BIGGER SWIMMING POOL 1 0.6% NEW OFFICES/BUSINESSES 1 0.6% MORE STREET FRIENDLY BUS TO CULTIVATE A PEDESTRIAN ENVIRON 1 0.6% MASS TRANSIT INFRASTRUCTURE 1 0.6% BETTER INFORMATION ON WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THE CITY 1 0.6% NO BURMS IN THE ROAD 1 0.6% HAVE MORE EVENTS OR A PLACE TO HOLD EVENTS IN DOWNTOWN 1 0.6% POST OFFICE SOUTH OF OVERLAND ROAD 1 0.6% FARMER'S MARKET 1 0.6% EAGLE/FAIRVIEW IS THE WAY TO GO! I 0.6% MORE CITY SPONSERED ACTIVITIES I 0.6% KEPT CLEAN I 0.6% LESS 2ND HAND STORES & SMOKE/VAPOR SHOPS -NOT COMM PROMOTING I 0.6% HISTORICAL MARKERS I 0.6% MORE SUMMER EVENTS I 0.6% GREENBELT I 0.6% DESTINATION PLACES NOT THERE THAT I LIKE I 0.6% DO WE HAVE A COMMUNITY EDUCATION PROGRAM LIKE BOISE? I 0.6% CLEAN UP OF DILAPIDATED HOUSES I 0.6% MORE SIDE WALKS I 0.6% INDOOR COMM POOL & ICE SKATING RINK.IT WOULD BRINGINTEAMSTORENT 1 0.6% OPEN SPACE 1 0.6% OVERSIGHT OF MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL. 1 0.6% BUSES 1 0.6% REQUIRE LUMBER YARDS TO KEEP THEIR BLDGS UP. NEED WALK WAYS IN ALL NBHOOD 1 0.6% OR PLEASE DON'T USE IF YOU ARE NOT HANDICAP. 1 0.6% DEVELOP THE EMPTY LOT ON 2 1/2 ST/CARLTON 1 0.6% (MORE 1 0.6% MORE AFTER HOURS EVENTS. 1 0.6% ETC Institute (2014) Page 90 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 025. Name THREE things You would like to see added or increased in Downtown Meridian. (Item 3) MORE VOLUNTEER COMMUNITY POSITIONS AT CITY HALL 1 0.6% PATRIOTIC TRADITIONS OR HONORINGS 1 0.6% MORE LIVING SPACE 1 0.6% EVENTS ON DAYS OTHER THAN SATURDAY 1 0.6% YOUTH ACTIVITIES 1 0.6% KEEP THE SPEED LIMIT WHERE IT IS NOW 1 0.6% MORE UPSCALE LOOK AND GREENER I 0.6% CONTINUE WITH MORE STREET LAMPS I 0.6% ENTERTAINMENT (CONCERTS, FOOD, ETC.) I 0.6% BEND, OR HAS GREAT DOWNTOWN I 0.6% DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES I 0.6% NO MORE BARRIERS ON THE ROAD (PLEASE) I 0.6% ATTRACTIVE BUILDING REFLECTING OUR HERITAGE I 0.6% AQUARIUM I 0.6% ELIMINATE ENTITLEMENTS GIVEN TO GOV EMPLOYEE. I 0.6% OVERALL CLEANLINESS COULD BE BETTER I 0.6% CULTURAL CENTERS (THEATERS/OPERA HOUSES) I 0.6% COMMUNITY EVENTS I 0.6% BETTER WALKWAY/STROLLING AREA THROUGH MAIN ST I 0.6% IS THERE A BOOK STORE? I 0.6% SELECTIVE GROWTH I 0.6% LESS POLITICS, MORE TACOS! 1 0.6% INCREASED SENSE OF COMMUNITY 1 0.6% OVERALL IMPROVEMENT OF LOOK 1 0.6% EMPLOYMENT 1 0.6% MORE FESTIVALS 1 0.6% COMMUNITY EVENTS 1 0.6% PLACES FOR NEW JOBS 1 0.6% MORE FAMILY ORIENTED ACTIVITIES I 0.6% PLANNING TO HANDLE GROWTH AND MAINTAIN A QUALITY INFRASTRUCTURE I 0.6% GLASS RECYCLING! I 0.6% A PERMANENT ORGANIC SUPERMARKET I 0.6% MORE THINGS TO SEE I 0.6% SOME OF THE BARS LOOK FAIRLY SEEDY. I 0.6% PUBLIC AREAS (PARK, OR BENCHES) I 0.6% A BIGGER AND NICER RECREATION/COMMUNITY CENTER SIMILAR TO WHAT NAMPA HAS I 0.6% ETC Institute (2014) Page 91 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 025. Name THREE things You would like to see added or increased in Downtown Meridian. (Item 3) BETTER SAFE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR BIKE TRAFFIC ON MAJOR ROADWAYS LIKE LOCUST GROVE, USTICK ETC. 1 0.6% BIKE FRIENDLY ROADS 1 0.6% PARK AREAS 1 0.6% MORE BIKE PATHS 1 0.6% EVENTS 1 0.6% LIGHTING 1 0.6% REIGN IN MULTIPLE AREA'CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS, SPREAD THEM OUT A BIT 1 0.6% GREENER ENVIRONMENT 1 0.6% UPDATE OF OLD DILAPIDATED BUSINESS BUILDINGS, EVEN THOSE THAT ARE OCCUPIED 1 0.6% WIDEN MERIDIAN ROAD 1 0.6% IMPROVE OLD SIDEWALKS (WIDER, REPAIR REGULARLY) I 0.6% I RARELY SEE DOWNTOWN GIVEN THE NEW TRAFFIC PATTERN. I 0.6% BREWERY I 0.6% MORE EVENTS I 0.6% FAMILY FRIENDLY SHOPPING I 0.6% EVENING MUSIC I 0.6% AESTHETICS - FLOWERS, PLANTS, GRENNERY I 0.6% MORE SHADE TREES I 0.6% STOPLIGHT AT MAIN/CARLTON 1 0.6% OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES 1 0.6% FARMERS MARKET 1 0.6% BATHROOM AT PARK BY COMMUNITY CENTER 1 0.6% ENCOURAGEMENT OF STREET PERFORMERS, DURING GOOD WEATHER 1 0.6% ELIMINATE EYE SORE HOMES 1 0.6% TIRED OF ALL OF THE ROAD CONSTRUCITON. PERHAPS NECESSARY BUT CAN IT BE DONE FASTER? 1 0.6% ELININATION OF ONE WAY STREETS 1 0.6% ADD TRADER JOE'S 1 0.6% INCENTIVE TO PARK, WALK AND SHOP DOWNTOWN. SIMILAR TO 16TH STREET MALL IN DENVER 1 0.6% ADD AN ENTERTAINMENT VENUE (PLAYHOUSE, CINEMA, SPORTING VENUE) TO DRAW A LARGER AUDIENCE. 1 0.6% ETC Institute (2014) Page 92 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 025. Name THREE things You would like to see added or increased in Downtown Meridian. (Item 3) KEEP SECURITY AND CLEAN UP A PRIORITY TO MAINTAIN THE INTEGRITY AND FAMILY -FRIENDLY ATMOSPHERE 1 0.6% CONSISTENCY IN BUILDING DESIGN/FRONTAGE 1 0.6% SNACK WAGONS OR SMALL SNACK SHOPS 1 0.6% FAMILY BUSINESSES 1 0.6% GENERAL REDEVELOPMENT OF OLDER BUILDINGS WITH NO ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFIGANCE 1 0.6% MORE PUBLIC EVENTS 1 0.6% BREWERY I 0.6% LESS DENSITY FOR HOUSING I 0.6% MORE PARADES, FESTIVALS (BRING BACK SCARECROW FESTIVAL) I 0.6% REROUTING OF TRAFFIC AROUND THE CITY I 0.6% UNIQUE I 0.6% WHITE COLLAR BUSINESSES I 0.6% MAN-MADE LAKE I 0.6% EAGLE ROAD HAS ALL OF THE RETAIL I 0.6% NO BIKE LANES ON THE ROAD I 0.6% STOP KILL I 0.6% REBUILD BUILDINGEDS TO MODERNIZE THEM I 0.6% MORE VARIETY OF RESTAURANTS, PATIO SEATING. MORE VIBRANCY I 0.6% MORE NATIVE PLANT USEAGE FOR STREET ENHANCEMENT I 0.6% MORE OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES LIKE FAIRS AND CARNIVALS I 0.6% GOOD FARMERS MARKET NEEDED I 0.6% MORE BIKE OPPORTUNITIES I 0.6% MORE LEISURE SPOTS 1 0.6% MOVIE THEATRE 1 0.6% IMPROVEMENTS TO BUILDINGS 1 0.6% Total 180 100.0% ETC Institute (2014) Page 93 27. Your ¢ender: 027. Your vender Male Female Total 028. What is your ate? 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 248 48.2% 514 100.0% 18 to 34 87 16.9% 35 to 44 104 20.2% 45 to 54 109 21.2% 55 to 64 104 20.2% 65+ 105 20.4% Not provided 5 1.0% Total 514 100.0% 029. Which of the following best describes the home in which you live? 029. Which home do you live in Number Percent A manufactured trailer or mobile home 4 0.8% An apartment 10 1.9% A condominium 2 0.4% Townhouse or duplex 15 2.9% A detached single-family house 472 91.8% Other 8 1.6% Not provided 3 0.6% Total 514 100.0% ETC Institute (2014) Page 94 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 030. Do you own or rent your home? 030. Do you own or rent your home Number Percent Own 453 88.1% Rent 58 11.3% Other 3 0.6% Total 514 100.0% 031. How many years have you lived in Meridian? 031 How many} ears have you lived in Meridian Number Percent 5 years or less 99 19.3% 6 to 10 years 143 27.8% 11 to 15 years 92 17.9% 16 to 20 years 84 16.3% 21 to 30 years 48 9.3% 31+ years 27 5.3% Not Provided 21 4.1% Total 514 100.0% 032. includin¢ yourself, how many neonle in your household are: Number 2.67 Under Age 5 0.14 Ages 5-9 0.24 Ages 10-14 0.24 Ages 15-17 0.14 Ages 18+ 1.90 ETC Institute (2014) Page 95 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 033. Does your household have a doe? 033. Does your household have a doe, Number Percent Yes 232 45.1 % No 282 54.9% Total 514 100.0% 033a. (If YES to Ouestion 33 How many does do you have in your household? 033a. How many dogs do you have in your household Number Percent One 151 65.1 % Two 63 27.2% Three 11 4.7% Four+ 1 0.4% Not provided 6 2.6% Total 232 100.0% 033b. (If YES to Ouestion 33) Do N°ou know that Meridian requires does to be licensed annually? Q33b. Do you know that Meridian requires dogs to be licensed annually Number Percent Yes 208 89.7% No 24 10.3% Total 232 100.0% ETC Institute (2014) Page 96 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 034. Which of the followin¢ best describes your current employment status? 034. Your current employment status Number Percent Employed full time 270 52.5% Employed part time 40 7.8% Self-employed 34 6.6% Not employed outside home, a homemaker 41 8.0% Retired 102 19.8% A full-time student, not working 2 0.4% A student working full time 1 0.2% A student working part time 3 0.6% Not employed due to a disability 10 1.9% Not employed, but seeking work 9 1.8% Not employed, but not seeking work 3 0.6% Other 1 0.2% Total 524 035. What is the aaaroximate total annual family income of all members of your household? 035. Total annual family income of all members of household Number Percent Less than $20,000 21 4.1% $20,000-$34,999 43 8.4% $35,000-$49,999 70 13.6% $50,000-$74,999 99 19.3% $75,000-$99,999 81 15.8% $100,000-$149,999 92 17.9% $150,000-$199,999 17 3.3% $200,000+ 16 3.1 % Total 514 100.0% ETC Institute (2014) Page 97 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report 036. Do you have a landline telephone in your home that is used to make and receive calls? 036. Do you have a landline telephone in your home Number Percent Yes 401 78.0% No 113 22.0% Total 514 100.0% O36a. (If YES to Ouestion 36) In addition to your normal telephone, do you have a cell shone in your home that is used to make and receive calls? 036a. Do you have a cell phone in your home Number Percent Yes 373 93.0% No 22 5.5% Not provided 6 1.5% Total 401 100.0% O36b. (If YES to Question 36) Do you primarily use your cell phone, landline or both to make and receh a calls`.' 0366. Do you primarily use your cell phone, landline or both Number Percent Primarily use cell phone 114 28.4% Primarily use landline 112 27.9% Use both equally 159 39.7% 401 100.0% 037. Do you have a cell phone in your home that is used to make and receive calls? 037. Do you have a cell phone in your home Number Percent Yes 441 85.8% No 40 7.8% Not provided 33 6.4% Total 514 100.0% ETC Institute (2014) Page 98 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Community Central Meridian 102 19.8% Northeast Meridian 161 31.3% Northwest Meridian 162 31.5 % 'Dotal 514 100.0% ETC Institute (2014) Page 99 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey Findings Report Section S: Survey Instrument ETC Institute (2014) Page 100 E IDIANT� March 6, 2014 Dear Meridian Resident, Mayor Tammy de Weerd City Council Members: Keith Bird Joe Borton Luke Cavener Genesis Milam Charlie Rountree David Zaremba The City of Meridian wants to know your thoughts on how we are doing in providing service to you our residents. We ask that you invest a few minutes of your time to take this important customer satisfaction survey which you have been randomly chosen to participate in. Your input and feedback will help the City make decisions regarding the delivery and quality of services we provide you and your neighbors. Your responses will help us better understand your use of and satisfaction with City services, programs, and your impressions about the performance of the City as a whole. The survey is designed to cover a wide variety of topics including your feelings about how the City uses your tax dollars, how safe you feel in the City, and how you perceive Meridian as a place to live. In addition, this survey will touch on services like roads which are provided by our partner organizations. The survey is being conducted by ETC Institute, a national market research firm that specializes in conducting surveys for local governments. The survey is entirely voluntary and should take only 10 to 15 minutes of your time. We ask that you complete it as soon as possible. You can either complete the written survey and return it in the mail using the postage paid envelope, or complete the survey online at www.meridiancitysurvey.org. Please know that regardless of how you complete it, your survey responses will be completely confidential and combined with the responses of other Meridian residents. Thank you in advance for your participation. Your feedback matters and is critical to our understanding of the current and future needs of our Meridian residents. If you have questions on this survey, please contact the City of Meridian Mayor's Office at 489- 0529. Otherwise, you can look for the survey results to be posted on the City of Meridian's website (www.meridiancity. org) in May. My warmest regards, Mayor's Office . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-888-4433 . Fax 208-884-8119 . www.meridiancity.orq 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey E IDIAN -- Please take a few minutes to complete this survey. Your input is an important part of the City's on-going effort to improve the quality of services provided by the City. You may also complete this survey on-line by going to www.meddiancitysurvey.org. If you have questions, please call the Mayors Office at 489-0529. THANK YOU! The vision for the City of Meridian is as follows: "Meridian is a vibrant community whose vision is to be the premier city to live, work and raise a family." Several items that may influence your perception of Meridian as a community are listed below. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the City of Meridian in the following areas. A. As a place to live Excellent 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor 0 D. Know 99 B. Asa place to work 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 C. As a place to raise a family 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 D. Asa place to start/do business 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 E. As a city that is building a strong sense of community 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 F. As a city that is developing a strong local economy 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 G. As a city that is developing a strong local workforce that can compete in today's economic climate 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 H. As a city that is planning for future growth and development 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 I. As a city that is developing a sustainable and conscious environment 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 J. How well the City is protecting the quality of the air and water 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 K. How well the City is maintaining high quality neighborhoods 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 L. How well the City is providing options for mobility other than driving 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 M. How well the City is ensuring public safety 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 N How well the City is assisting in improving the vibrancy and quality of downtown Meridian 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 0. How well the City is communicating with the community 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 2. While the City is not the sole contributor to your quality of life, it is important to understand the perceptions residents have of the quality of life in Meridian. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "greatly exceeds my expectations" and 0 means 3. What is the single most important issue facing the City? 2014 ETC Institute 4. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "strongly agree" and 0 means "strongly disagree," please rate your level of aareement with the followina. A. Quality housing and a variety of options exist in Meridian Strongly.. Agree 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Disagree 0 D. 99 B. Development in the City enhances the quality of life 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 C. There are a variety of employment oortunities in Meridian 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 D. Access to quality shopping and entertainment exist in Meridian 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 E. The City is managing growth wisely 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 F. Meridian has a sense of community 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 099 99 G. The Cit continuous) im roves services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 tl 0 99 H. The Ci uses our tax dollars wise) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 I. The Ci is headed in the riht direction 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 5. If you own a home in Meridian, 29% of your total property tax bill goes to the City of Meridian to fund the City's operating budget for police, fire and parks services. Relating to services and facilities in the City of Meridian, using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "definitely getting my money's worth" and 0 means "definitely not getting my money's worth," please rate the value you feel you are oettino for Citv tax dollars and fees. 6. Using a scale of 0 to 10 where 10 means "very good value" and 0 means "very poor value," please rate the value that you feel you receive for Meridian's City Utility services. A. Value received for City water services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 B. Value received for City sewer services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 C. Residential trash collection services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 D. Curbside recvclina services 10 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 0 99 7. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the quality of the following City services. A. Lmergency Emergencymedical services Excellent 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor 0 D. Know 99 B. Fire protection 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 C. Police department/law enforcement 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 D. Code enforcement 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 E. Traffic enforcement 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 F. Planning & zoning services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 G. Building services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 H. Sewer services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 I. Water services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 J. Garbage/trash pick-up services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 K. Recycling services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 L. City parks 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 M. Recreation programs 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 N. Programs for youth 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 0. Communications 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 8. Which THREE of the City Services listed above do you think should receive the most emphasis from City leaders over the next TWOyears? [Enter the letters for your top choices using the list in Question 7 above.] 1 St: 2nd: 3b: 2014 ETC Institute 2 9. There are a variety of functions or services which are performed in Meridian by other governmental entities, agencies or groups as their primary function or through a contract with the City. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the following aspects of our community. 10.The Ada County Highway District is the road authority for Ada County and the City of Meridian. State highways (Eagle Road, Meridian Road, and Chinden Boulevard) are operated by the Idaho Transportation Department. The City of Meridian works with these road providers to prioritize needed transportation related improvements in the community. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the following road -related aspects of our community. A. Excellent Excellent 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor D. B. Availability and condition of sidewalks 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Know A. Public transportation services contracted with Valley Regional Transit 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 B. Animal control contracted with Idaho Humane Society 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 C. Programs for seniors at the Meridian Senior Center 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 D. K-12 education by Joint School District No. 2 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 E. Lakeview Golf Course 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 F. Library services by the Meridian Library District 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 G Bringing new jobs to the area with the Boise Valley Economic 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 Partnership 10.The Ada County Highway District is the road authority for Ada County and the City of Meridian. State highways (Eagle Road, Meridian Road, and Chinden Boulevard) are operated by the Idaho Transportation Department. The City of Meridian works with these road providers to prioritize needed transportation related improvements in the community. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the following road -related aspects of our community. A. Condition of roadway pavement in Meridian Excellent 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor 0 D. Know 99 B. Availability and condition of sidewalks 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 C. Management of traffic flow and congestion in Meridian 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 D. Adequacy of street lighting on arterial roadways 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 E. Bike lanes on roads 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 F. Overall maintenance of street signs/pavement markings 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 11.There are a variety of projects which have been identified by the community as "desired" amenities, some of which the City has limited to no involvement in making them happen. In addition, the City has taken the position to save for future improvements and not bond for new facilities. Knowing this, which items would you like to see in Meridian using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "high priority" and 0 means "no priority." A. Add gym space for recreation programs High Priority 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 No Priority 0 D. 99 B. Constructing Linder Road overpass 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 C. Building a composting facility for yard waste 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 D. Redeveloping downtown 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 E. Building a performing arts center 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 F. Adding more bike lanes and pathways 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 G. Providing more public transportation options 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 H. Developing a pathway along the rail corridor 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 I. Sports stadium and recreation venue 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 12.The City has built much of its current park system through partnerships with developers and non-profit organizations. The City is considering a partnership approach with a non-profit organization that would help meet the City's need for gym space for recreation programs. Are you supportive of the City using this approach? (1) Yes (2) No (3) Not sure 2014 ETC Institute 13.The City uses a variety of methods to communicate with the public, including its website, social media such as Facebook and Twitter, traditional media such as newspapers, radio, and television, and a bi-weekly newsletter. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the following communication services. 14.Where do you currently get information about Meridian's services and programs? (01) City website Excellent (02) Facebook (09) Emails from the City (03) Twitter (10) Events such as Coffee with the Mayor (04) Television/news (11) Library (05) Flyers in utility bills (12) Chamber of CommerceNisitor Center Poor D. (07) Newspaper 10 15.Howwould youro eferto receive information about Meridian's services and programs? (1) Texts (6) Traditional media (television, newspaper, radio) (2) Emails (7) Flyers in utility bills (3) City's website (8) City publications (4) Social media (9) Other source: (5) Mobile applications Know A. Effectiveness of City communications with the public 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 B. Opportunities for public involvement in local decision-making 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 C. Quality of www.meddiancity.org 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 D The usefulness of the online services available on the City of 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 G. Number of pathwaysfor walking and biking Meridian's website bill pay/class re istration 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 E. Quality of information about City programs and services 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 14.Where do you currently get information about Meridian's services and programs? (01) City website (08) Radio (02) Facebook (09) Emails from the City (03) Twitter (10) Events such as Coffee with the Mayor (04) Television/news (11) Library (05) Flyers in utility bills (12) Chamber of CommerceNisitor Center (06) Information booklets/City publications (13) Other source: (07) Newspaper 10 15.Howwould youro eferto receive information about Meridian's services and programs? (1) Texts (6) Traditional media (television, newspaper, radio) (2) Emails (7) Flyers in utility bills (3) City's website (8) City publications (4) Social media (9) Other source: (5) Mobile applications 99 16.The City Parks and Recreation Department maintains 20 parks, provides 684 sports leagues and recreation programs, holds 11 special events, and provides information using social media, seasonal activity guides, and email updates. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the following parks and recreation services. A. Number of City parks Excellent 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor 0 D. Know 99 B. Quality, appearance and maintenance of City parks 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 C. Number of athletic fields 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 D. Quality of athletic fields 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 E. Number of special events and festivals 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 F. Quality and variety of special events and festivals 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 G. Number of pathwaysfor walking and biking 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 H. Quality of pathways for walking and biking 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 I. Availability of parks/green space near your home 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 J. Availability of information about recreation programs and classes through social media, Activity Guides, email updates, website, etc. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 K. Availability of community center and gym facilities 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 L. Number of recreation programs and classes 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 M. Quality and variety of recreation programs and classes 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 N. Number of adultsports programs and sporting events 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 0. Quality of the adult sports programs and sporting events 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 P. Ease of registering for recreational sports programs or classes 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 Q. Cost of recreational sports programs or classes 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 R. Ease of registering for picnic shelter reservations 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 Availability of youth sports programs through partners, such as the S. Police Activities League (PAL), Meridian Youth Baseball (WB), and others. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 Quality of youth sports programs through partners, such as the T. Police Activities League (PAL), Meridian Youth Baseball (MYB), and others. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 2014 ETC Institute 17. In the past 12 months, have you or anyone in your household visited a City of Meridian park? (1) Yes, I have personally visited a City park in the last year [answer Q17a] (2) Yes, a household member has visited a City park in the last year [answer Q17a] (3) No [go to Q18] 17a. [If YES to Q17] How often did you or someone in your household visit a City park? _(1) Less than once a month _(4) Once a week or more _(2) Once a month _(5) Don't know _(3) 2-3 times a month 18.Thinking about the City of Meridian park system, which would you rather see emphasized? (Please check just one) (1) Development of large regional or community parks with a variety of amenities similar to Settlers Park/Julius M. Kleiner Park/Bear Creek Park (2) Development of more neighborhood parks similar to Champions Park/Renaissance Park/Seasons Park with playground style amenities 19. Do you have a working smoke detector in your home? (1) Yes (2) No (3) Don't know 20.The National Standard for the Fire Department to respond to an emergency is 5 minutes or less 90% of the time from when the Department is alerted to a call. The City of Meridian's Fire Department currently responds to emergencies in 7 minutes or less 90% of the time and meets the national standard 56.6% of the time. Does this response time meet your level of service expectation? (1) Yes (2) No 21.Public safety has prioritized public outreach using social media, public presentations, citizen academies, and volunteer opportunities like citizen park patrols. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the following public safety services. A. Overall feeling of safety in the city Excellent 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor 0 Do Know 99 B. Quality of local police protection 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 C. How quickly police respond to 911 emergencies 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 D. The visibility of police in neighborhoods 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 E. Safety in City parks 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 F. Police safety education programs 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 G. Professionalism of employees responding to emergencies 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 H. Overall quality of local fire protection 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 I. How quickly fire rescue responds to 911 emergencies 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 J. Quality of Emergency Medical Services EMS 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 K. Fire safety education programs 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 L. Location of fire stations 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 22. Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means "excellent" and 0 means "poor," please rate the City's efforts in the enforcement of the following codes and ordinances. A. Weed abatement Excellent 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Poor 0 Do Know 99 B. Removal of graffiti 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 C. Abandoned/junk automobile removal 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 D. Clean-up of litter and debris on private property 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 E. Dilapidated houses or buildings 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 F. Illegal dumping 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 99 23.Some neighborhoods have a great "sense of community." People know their neighbors form Neighborhood Watch Programs or have block parties and truly think of the others in the same area as "neighbors." Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 means a "very strong sense of community" and 0 means "no sense of community at all," please rate the sense of community in your 24.The City and its community partners have been focused on downtown redevelopment such as enhancing signage, adding kiosks with information, and community events. Did you visit downtown at least once during the past year? (1) Yes [answer Q24a-c] (2) No [go to Q25] (3) Don't remember [go to Q25] 24a. [If YES to Q24] What was the nature of your visit or visits to downtown? (1) Leisure (restaurant, bar, etc.) (2) Business (3) Cultural Event (Initial Point Gallery) (4) City Hall (5) Shopping (6) Festival, parade, or other event (7) Other: 24b. [If YES to Q24] How many times did you visit downtown Meridian for purposes other than work? (1) Less than 5 times (4) More than 20 times (2) 5 to 10 times (5) Don't know (3) 11 to 20 times 24c. [If YES to Q24] When you think about your visits to downtown over the last year, how satisfied were you with your overall experience? (1) Very dissatisfied (4) Somewhat satisfied (2) Somewhat dissatisfied (5) Very satisfied (3) Neutral (6) Neutral 25. Name THREE things you would like to see added or increased in downtown Meridian? Item 1: Item 2: Item 3: 26. What is your vision for the City of Meridian? 27. Your gender?(1) Male 28. What is your age? (1) 18 to 24 (2) 25 to 34 2014 ETC Institute (2) Female (3) 35 to 44 (4) 45 to 54 (5) 55 to 64 (6) 65 or older 29. Which of the following best describes the home in which you live? (1) A manufactured trailer or mobile home (4) Townhouse or duplex (2) An apartment (5) A detached single-family house (3) A condominium (6) Other: 30. Do you own or rent your home? (1) Own (2) Rent 31. How many years and months have you lived in Meridian? # of years # of months (3) Don't know (4) Other: 32. Including yourself, how many people in your household are: Under Age 5 Ages 10-14 Ages 18 and over Ages 5-9 Ages 15-17 33. Does your household have a dog?(1) Yes [answer Q33a-b] (2) No [go to Q34] 33a. [If YES to Q#33] How many dogs do you have in your household? _(1) One _(3) Three _(2) Two _(4) Four or more 33b. [If YES to Q#33] Do you know that Meridian requires dogs to be licensed annually? _(1) Yes _(2) No 34. Which of the following best describes your current employment status? [select one] (01) Employed full time (07) A student working full time (02) Employed part time (08) A student working part time (03) Self-employed (09) Not employed due to a disability (04) Not employed outside the home; a homemaker _(1 0) Not employed, but seeking work (05) Retired _(1 1) Not employed, but NOT seeking work (06) A full-time student, not working _(1 2) Other: 35. What is the approximate total annual family income of all members of your household? (01) Less than $20,000 (04) $50,000-$74,999 (07) 150,000-$199,999 (02) $20,000-$34,999 (05) $75,000-$99,999 (08) $200,000 or more (03) $35,000-$49,999 (06) $100,000-$149,999 (09) Not sure 36. Do you have a landline telephone in your home that is used to make and receive calls? (1) Yes [answer Q36a-b] (2) No [go to Q37] 36a. [If YES to Q36] In addition to your normal telephone, do you have a cell phone in your home that is used to make and receive calls? _(1)Yes _(2)No 36b. [If YES to Q36] Do you primarily use your cell phone, landline or both to make and receive calls? _(1) Primarily use cell phone _(3) Use both equally _(2) Primarily use landline 37. Do you have a cell phone in your home that is used to make and receive calls? (1) Yes (2) No This concludes the survey. Thank you for your time! Please Return Your Completed Survey in the Enclosed Postage Paid Envelope Addressed to: ETC Institute, 725 W. Frontier Circle, Meridian, KS 66061 Your responses will remain Completely Confidential. The information printed to the right will ONLY be used to help identify which areas of the City are having problems with city services. If your address is not correct, please provide the correct information. Thank you. 2014 ETC Institute Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 24, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Mayor's Office: Resolution No. Ig 'qn Adopting 2014 Meridian Citizens Survey Results MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 11 ni BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, BORTON, CAVENER MILAM, ROUNTREE, ZAREMBA A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO ADOPTING THE 2014 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITIZEN SURVEY. WHEREAS, on June 10, 2014 the 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey was presented to the Mayor and the Meridian City Council; WHEREAS, the purpose of the 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey is to provide the City of Meridian with a written summary that assesses citizen satisfaction with the quality of city services. WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian have approved the adoption of the 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Meridian hereby adopts the 2014 City of Meridian Citizen Survey as set forth in Exhibit A, as attached. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 2 day of June, 2014. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this vq�ay of June, 2014. APPROVED: �-�-- 7e eer ATTEST: Goo 9 Cit, By: IDIAN aycee . Holman, City Clerk m SFA: 2T _ '. `rQ AV (EAo iPE AS�P'FV RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2014 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITIZEN SURVEY -PAGE 1 OF 1 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 24, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: $C PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Fire Dept.: Budge Amendment for Public Education Prevention for the Not -to -Exceed Amount of $17,602.00 MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS f � k Q § � k � k 0 2 § LeA (fƒ u gm{m (-:; /0 7f00 ) )\ 5 cr +wlq U3/g; C \Mo �\ C0O_ [ |0 - &CL - - ,_! &§ _ o ,(AD-UHH ( cc ro \ `}�CD \/ § 0 �E - M CD ( m CD : _ / N ¥ \R= \m \/ 9 CL , k \CD } \\\ CD \\CD c D} #|2| - /§ - �22; ) } CD CL M �\ \ }\ (D0 D M 17 \}\cr \omm \ CL 0C) 0 }/)\CIL - _ - \ \ \/ \ \\CL � en /CL \\ co lu CD }( ƒ \ ° '_ ° ®\ co m} } } f � k Q § � k � k 0 2 § LeA (fƒ =(!E 5 cr +wlq ,(AD-UHH 7 § @ ( / N ¢ ¥ 9 k 0 ca m a 7 (o Co m N w o m 3 CL m a O m '-• a cm 0 3 A) M- C) 7 ma M m as O• C p CL m m 3 (D (c 3 0 m C u o M w 3 C 3 C a CL °: o N 0 o s O y N m 0 s m � ° � n O- Oobi m rt' O O d m m n z m m �v N Z v O CL o o N m — C N to CD OrD C) Z D�DrNNNd?dO a � N 71 0 ❑ d r� 01 O m a 0 m \ O C 0 Aox z m 0 G ❑ -I 1 z W N d � x° N Pt m y omrm°- (: ti r3 a o mm cioo c o oN^� m c 0 � c 33 y N V) a 0 v C7 a fA o' 'U nwm _. a 0 y �0 3 d C N 0 N 3 O (ry 69 to fA -1 v a EH N N m m rn v o' m m m a N O O O N� C v EA 0 0 0 0 0° m y 0 0000M. N ' N 0 0 X c a di I 0a X w V I 7 VI H3 Efl H3 Efl O N 0 D� o I< 3 O m m � ° � n O- Oobi m rt' O O d m m n wZ � c m m �v N Z v O CL o m` O- N m — C N to CD (/ C) Z ° ° a � N 71 u � ❑ d r� 01 O m a 0 m \ O C 0 Aox z m 0 G zz ❑ -I 1 m z W N d � x° N Pt m y (: ti f�r r3 a o C O W D 7 ;ajmz O- Oobi m m r A Z� A A d I A A w 0n n 00 N O N O O OD N N N .h ° ° � � N W N ❑ d r� 01 O m a 0 m \ O C 0 Aox z m 0 G zz ❑ -I D m0 z c x° N m y a 3 r3 a o C n c o a m c 0 � c 33 y N 0 Cl) m v C7 fA o' 'U a 0 y �0 3 d C m y 3 O m _3 O O -1 v a N N m m � 3 m a :,4 W 0 C v EA 3 m' N m y m CL m N ' N 0 0 X c r o N O W D 7 ;ajmz O- O m m r A A A A d I A A A 0n n 00 N O N O N O N O N N N .h ° ° 5. T N W N ❑ -�oofD O 01 O m a 0 m \ O C 0 Aox z m 0 G zz ❑ -I D ❑ z c 7 mon a 3 r3 a o C n c o m c 0 � m 33 y 0 Cl) m v C7 o' 'U a 0 y �0 d C C y 3 O O _3 O O -1 v N N m F m 3 m :,4 W 0 m m EA 3 m y m CL m ' N O X c r o N 0a X - m 7 VI H3 Efl H3 Efl fA D� I< 3 O m m O C 0 a O W D 7 ;ajmz O- O o m m m r A O W D 7 ;ajmz m�� O o m m m r A A A A d I A A A 0n n M N O N O N O N O N N N ° ° N mNNNN yVt N W N ❑ -�oofD O 01 O 0 a 0 m \ O C 0 0 z m 0 G zz ❑ -I ❑ ❑ z c 3 r3 a o m- n <O� m c OOm�D 33 y 0 tom -i m v C7 m m a 0 y d C y 3 O O O O -1 v m F m 3 m W 0 m m m y m CL N d X c r o - m 7 VI H3 Efl H3 Efl fA D� 3 O m O C 0 w m CLI 1 z U W D 7 ;ajmz m�� O o m x w -mi D mD m EMM w w 0 v0 m m� �m mD vz m m z --1 T 0 m X m a m w d eo, d I d D N N N W 'O ❑ \ 0 \ C 0 0 z m 0 G ❑ ❑ -I ❑ ❑ z c Ram Orr From: Iverson, Sherry �ivefsons@slhs.orcd> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 10:33 AM To: Pam 011 Ce: Alex Bolen; Snyder, Scott Mb Subject: Car seat Grant Good morning On behalf of the Idaho Chapter of the AAP Executive Board, we are excited to have Meridian Fire_ Join us in the Child Passenger Safety Grant. This grant will end on Sept 30, 2014 and all receipts trust be turned in and a final report by Oct. 10, 2014. Please work With Alex our book keeper to ensure that the products you are burying are "buy America" and if you have any questions. We do have a site for your car seats to be, delivered so I am happy to help coordinate that component. The car consists of $9000 to be spent on car seats of ail types and other supplies needed for car seat checks; swim noodles, locking clips etc. You also have $1500 to use in educational supplies such as pamphlels, manuals etc, As September 1" approaches if you are unable to utilize all your dollars please let me know so that I can help spend the looney and distribute to others around the region. I am thrilled to have you part of this grant, and am available to help at any time, Sherry Sherry Iverson, RN Idaho Chapter of the AAP iyersons@slhs.orr 208-381-3033 mg.slnnaurg mode the 10110suing 1111110106011S -------------- ------------------------------------------------------ "This message is irdended for the use ol'lhe person or enlity to which it is addresscd and may contain ind'urnudion 111.1( is confidential or privileged, the disclosureof wl»ch is governed by aFp)icable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipicni; you are hereby notified 111111. any dissemination. distribution, or Copying of Iltis deformation is slrictly prohibited. If you have received ilijs niessagc by error, please nglify its immediately and destroy the related message,." City Of Meridian Statement of Revenues and Expenditures - Rev and Exp Report - Todd 01 - General Fund 2290 - Fire Safehouse From 10/1/2013 Through 9/30/2014 TOTAL EXPENDITURES WITH TRANSFERS 90,093.24 50,696.03 39,397.21 Date. 6/18/14 02:34:22 PM Page: 1 Budget with Current Year Budget Amendments Actual Remaining REVENUES 33100 Grant Revenues 0.00 1,000.00 (11000.00) 34800 Donations (plus project 0.00 7,180.00 (7,180.00) code) Total REVENUES 0.00 8,180.00 (81180.00) PERSONNEL COSTS 41200 Wages 47,754.00 31,123.80 16,630.20 42021 FICA (7.65&) 3,653.16 2,331.94 1,321.22 42022 PERSI 5,568.12 3,523.21 2,044.91 42023 Workers' Comp 234.00 57.96 176.04 42025 Employee Insurance 12.371.04 928.22 11.442.82 Total PERSONNEL COSTS 69.580.32 37.965.13 31.615.19 OPERATING COSTS 51300 Office Expense 249.96 13.08 236.88 52201 Fuels - Gas 699.96 263.96 436.00 53100 Building Maintenance 6,873.00 6,773.30 99.70 53105 Vehicle Repair 500.04 0.00 500.04 53106 Vehicle Maintenance 500.04 0.00 500.04 53107 Equipment Maintenance 300.00 0.00 300.00 53420 Alarm Service/Sprinkler 750.00 741.00 9.00 System 54000 Equipment & Supplies 500.04 191.81 308.23 54120 Electronics Expense (under 500.04 0.00 500.04 $5000) 56101 Telephone/Internet 1,140.00 464.31 675.69 57210 City Training Classes 999.96 398.50 601.46 57400 Advertising/Promotional/P... 5,499.96 3,192.15 2,307.81 58101 Electricity - Idaho Power 999.96 390.26 609.70 58200 Intermountain Gas 999.96 302.53 697.43 Total OPERATING COSTS 20.512.92 12,730.90 7,782.02 DEPT EXPENDITURES 90,093.24 50,696.03 39,397.21 TOTAL EXPENDITURES WITH TRANSFERS 90,093.24 50,696.03 39,397.21 Date. 6/18/14 02:34:22 PM Page: 1 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 24, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: $D PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Arts Commission: Budget Amendment for Spending Authority for Concerts on Broadway for the Not -to -Exceed Amount of $15,000.00 MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS 0 c 0m S c d < N W < 3 D] d (D M CO ^' .Z (D CD C N O 3 3 0 a £ CD 0 N 6 0 7 O 7 y (D CL =r (D 3 O 3= C 3 3 7 (D O C N (D Q o Q (O O O d CL N < NO 6 d' $ 3 O N C: d 3 v a ol a M n < N 3 m a a O CL Q M< 3 C 3 Q Q Op O Q C O d C+ 0 a a C O ID m v 3 c o f 3 N a O 0 N 7 m(O33 (�7 `< (D 6 7 F n O d f1 (O U) G 7 N N N 3 d tr d m - Q a > n m n CL . Dai Q ° c _a 7 O O O N. o n N d S(7 � 3 7 O O mU3 3- - d o (D CL (D m O a O 3 � (D 7 S o.3 d .. CDH 7 o ° Q (O y �_ 7 w C O Q y CLto w O l< CL d 3 X c 3 CL 0 CL ry W m Q a N v° a A N N z Q (D 3 w M w 7 Q 6 N CL U3 S M N -0s o c O N (O/1 N N w .J 7 (D 3 CD (O N 0 3 .Q+1 O C 7 N (D Q E (D C M w Q Q O 7 w N 3 N O m 3 (D co CD O W C m Z v m A In O O C O X a C N co T1 O (D 3 O N d N 7 d W a xk < 2 ON O 0 O 7 CD A (D (D 0 Q O U) N 3. 3 j 3 CDH s N O O a v° O7� 0 N /,:,\ p\/.. ( / 02 UM 300 \ _ 1111111111M \ } �O\\ W�\ 0 �0 _ EL 3> 13 co ;mow rp �maQ; «z ! /,:,\ p\/.. ( / 02 UM 300 \ _ 1111111111M \ ') §§ k� §Z> m 5 E§ \ } �O\\ W�\ 0 \ ') §§ k� §Z> m 5 E§ \ } 0 _ EL 3> 13 co rp zƒ!{{\ «z \ } so\\�\ _ EL 3> 13 zƒ!{{\ «z so\\�\ Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 24, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: $E PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Mayor's Office: MYAC Budget Amendment and Spending Authority for Ball at the Hall for the Not -to -Exceed Amount of $2,275.00 MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS 03om- CCD fƒ CD \lCD< �/ wCD 0 2!! CD G _\� i 0 }a\ CD \ \CD CD \ CL � 00 ¥ CD w 0 §000M ) - $ CL _ \ /ty} \ 0CwD }\cCDr } \ cn ( CL_ }D k ■{J , ZY, CL } / �\ ) � } 0�CL D } \ (DCL CD ƒ0 §\ k _ CL _ CD 0 \� \ \ \ � Lco co cn CL o CD ZY (D § ) < Ix : CL m� CL \ } / ( � H k Q § � k ■ k 0 2 § \ CCD fƒ \lCD< CD i 0 CD / ID/ ¥ w 0 @ $ \ $ ( g k , ° 5 0 0 2 -CD k\ 3 § 0 J _o- : § �§ «; a t £ J F 0 \ El` z r / \> \ ~ /\\ M\ CL CL } ° 5 0 0 2 -CD k\ 3 § 0 J _o- : § �§ «; a t £ J F 0 \ El` z r / \> \ ~ /\\ M\ ° 5 0 0 2 -CD k\ 3 § 0 J _o- : § �§ «; a t £ J F 0 \ El` z r / /\\ M\ ° 5 0 0 2 -CD k\ 3 § 0 J _o- : § �§ «; a t £ J F 0 \ El` z r / Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 24, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Mayor's Office: Budget Amendment for Special Projects for a Not -to -Exceed Amount of $60,000.00 MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS = cf 7 ° c( ~ G }\ ICD \ CDCL (D -/ - - �,�o M. or CD \ / \ \ } \ (0 CD � c §CD #� - ) __ 3 CD }/\} \ \n } \ 0 CL \} }\ 3�MD : - |;/a _ co § CL \�\\ cCC0DD } ) •qm - \ m 3 co rmn� CL : \ \ } 00 RIZ 0 CL m §§ CD im E nz k � § � k � k 3 2 (\/ § \ § = o . o Cl \a ; § }\ \ 2 § &} ® FD§ / ; U £ � � Mi \ : \ ` F F F 0 : j : El ; « § \ : _ ��} n - j \ (D_ 7 / T2 CL \ ICL= C:- !\0 §/ m ID �k0mk \ \ ( ¢ > 0 §q fie = o . o Cl \a ; § }\ \ 2 § &} ® FD§ / ; U £ � � Mi \ : \ ` F F F 0 : j : El ; « § \/ ��} n C:- !\0 §/ m �k0mk ¢ > 0 §q fie §3/$/ §� a ;o[@ < 3 ) tr z *o °k e ; _ o / \ X 2 j ) } 0 CL } / m = o . o Cl \a ; § }\ \ 2 § &} ® FD§ / ; U £ � � Mi \ : \ ` F F F 0 : j : El ; « § \/ ��} = o . o Cl \a ; § }\ \ 2 § &} ® FD§ / ; U £ � � Mi \ : \ ` F F F 0 : j : El ; « § Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 24, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: $G PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Legal Dept.: Recipient Agreement Between City of Meridian and Meridian Boys & Girls Club for Contribution of Fiscal Year 2014 Funds not to exceed $500,000.00 MEETING NOTES �`- Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS RECIPIENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MERIDIAN AND BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA COUNTY FOR CONTRIBUTION OF FUNDS This Agreement is entered into this 24th day of June, 2014 by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the state of Idaho ("City") and Boys & Girls Clubs of Ada County, a nonprofit charitable corporation organized under the laws of the state of Idaho ("Recipient"). WHEREAS, City and Recipient have, over the course of several years, developed a relationship of cooperation and mutual assistance; and WHEREAS, under the public purpose doctrine underlying Idaho Constitution Article 8, section 2, as articulated by the Idaho Supreme Court in, e.g., Board of County Commissioners of Twin Falls County v. Idaho Health Facilities Authority, 96 Idaho 498 (1975), the City can finance activities that do have a primarily public purpose, rather than a primarily private purpose, that is, activities that both benefit the community of Meridian as a whole and are directly related to the function of government; WHEREAS, Recipient benefits the community of Meridian as a whole by offering its patrons recreational, creative, entertainment, socializing, informational, and educational opportunities; proactively meeting needs of an underserved and often low-income population, particularly at times of the day when alternative childcare resources are unavailable, thereby alleviating the need for other agencies, families, and organizations do so, leading to crime prevention, public safety for vulnerable persons, and ultimately, a responsible and productive citizenry; WHEREAS, the respective governing bodies of City and Recipient are mutually interested in enhancing the Meridian community's quality of life by providing and supporting recreational facilities and opportunities, including gymnasium programming, for members of the Meridian community; recognize that through cooperation, publicly -held facilities can be used to meet broader community needs for athletic programming and recreation than either party can provide separately; and find that it is fiscally responsible and in the best interest of the community to sharing the costs and benefits of gymnasium construction; WHEREAS, Idaho Code section 50-303 authorizes the City "to create, purchase, operate and maintain recreation and cultural facilities and activities"; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants of the Parties, the Parties agree as follows: I. SCOPE OF AGREEMENT A. Purpose of funds. Recipient shall use City funds provided, in the amount of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000), to fulfill Recipient's mission to "inspire and empower all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens," by constructing a gymnasium at the Boys & Girls Clubs of Ada County — Meridian Unit, located at 911 N. Meridian Road, in Meridian, Idaho, Ada County, parcel no. R6066000201, as generally set forth in Exhibit A hereto. As a condition of receiving City funds, Recipient shall be responsible for administering such funds in a manner satisfactory to City and consistent with any and all requirements set forth in this Agreement. FY14 RECIPIENT AGREEMENT—Boys & GiRLs CLUBS OF ADA COUNTY PAGE 1 OF 5 B. Documentation. During and following construction of the gymnasium, Recipient shall submit regular progress reports to City, in the form and content as requested by City. Within ninety (90) days of completion of construction of the gymnasium, Recipient shall provide to City a written report of activities undertaken under this Agreement, including narrative descriptions and records of each activity undertaken, dates of expenditure, materials or services purchased, receipts, and such other documentation as may be specifically requested by City to demonstrate compliance with this Agreement or furtherance of the purpose set forth herein. C. Performance monitoring. City will monitor the performance of Recipient against the purpose of funds provided as set forth herein. Performance monitoring may include City's review of Recipients' submitted documents for accuracy and completion, as well as an on-site visit from City staff to review the completeness and accuracy of records maintained. D. Time of performance. It is anticipated that Recipient shall start constructing the gymnasium on or before September 30, 2014, and shall complete construction by December 31, 2015. The term of this Agreement and the provisions herein shall be extended to cover- any additional time period during which Recipient remains in control of City funds. II. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A. Budget. It is expressly agreed and understood that the total amount to be paid by City under this Agreement shall not exceed five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000). B. Payment Procedures. City will pay to Recipient funds available under this Agreement within thirty (30) days of invoice submitted by Recipient, and consistent with any approved budget and City policy concerning payments. C. Records to be maintained. All of Recipient's records with respect to any matters covered by this Agreement shall be made available to City at any time during normal business hours, as often as deemed necessary, to audit, examine, and make copies of all relevant data, in order to comply with the Idaho Public Records Act. Recipient shall retain, and shall provide copies to City upon request, all records with respect to any matters covered by this Agreement for ten (10) years after conclusion of construction of the gymnasium. III. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Notices. All notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when personally served, or mailed in the United States mail, addressed as follows: City of Meridian Boys & Girls Clubs of Ada County Attn: City Clerk Attn: Colleen Braga 33 E. Broadway Avenue 911 N. Meridian Road Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Either party may change its authorized representative and/or address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner herein provided. FY14 RECIPIENT AGREEMENT— Boys & GIRLs CLUBS OF ADA COUNTY PAGE 2 OF 5 B. Compliance with laws. Recipient agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations, and policies governing the funds provided and activities undertaken under this Agreement. C. Indemnity. Recipient, and each and all of its employees, agents, contractors, officials, officers, servants, guests, and/or invitees, and all participants in Recipient's programming, shall hold harmless, defend and indemnify City from and for all such losses, claims, actions, and/or judgments for damages or injury to persons or property and/or losses and expenses caused or incurred by Recipient and/or its employees, agents, contractors, officials, officers, servants, guests, and/or invitees, and participants in its programming, and any and all other costs, including litigation costs and attorneys' fees, arising out of, resulting from, or in connection with the performance of this Agreement by Recipient and/or Recipient's employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors, officials, officers, servants, guests, invitees, participants, and/or volunteers and resulting in and/or attributable to personal injury, death, and/or damage and/or destruction to tangible or intangible property. Recipient shall bear any and all risks, some of which may be unknown, of all activities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement. D. Insurance. Recipient shall cant' sufficient insurance coverage to protect assets purchased with City funds from loss due to theft, fraud and/or undue physical damage. E. Penalty for material noncompliance. In addition to any other remedies as provided by law, upon a finding of material noncompliance with this Agreement, City shall be entitled to repayment in full of all funds provided to Recipient under this Agreement. Recipient shall remit payment in full of all funds provided by City to Recipient under this Agreement within thirty (30) days of City's written notice of material noncompliance and demand for repayment. Material noncompliance with this Agreement shall include, but shall not be limited to: failure by Recipient to comply with any statutes, regulations, or City policies or directives as may become applicable at any time; failure by Recipient to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement; ineffective or improper use of funds provided under this Agreement; or submission to City reports that are incorrect or incomplete in any material respect. F. Nondiscrimination. In performing activities pursuant to this Agreement, Recipient shall not unlawfully discriminate in violation of any federal, state or local law, rule or regulation against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability. G. Amendments. The parties hereto may amend this Agreement at any time provided that such amendments make specific reference to this Agreement, and are executed in writing, signed by a duly authorized representative of each party. H. Assignment. Recipient shall not assign or transfer any right or obligation conveyed by this Agreement without prior written consent of City. I. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, the reminder of the Agreement shall not be affected thereby and all other parts of this Agreement shall nevertheless be in full force and effect. J. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and FY 14 RECB'B?NT AGREEMENT —BOYS & Gn2Ls CLUBS OF ADA COUNTY PAGE 3 OF 5 supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. K. Approval required. This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the respective governing bodies of both City and Recipient. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties shall cause this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers to be effective as of the day and year first above written. RECIPIENT: Boys & Girls Clubs of Ada County By: Colleen Braga, Executive hector CITY: City of Meridian on cen7�� Attest: e�o`. �+ Lily A RRTnTA STs r.. By: Tainury du Weerd,s °""° 'Jaycee ab uYCity Clerk SEAL W Cot,�ui �/CSlQ2/s-_,/// yfF"o rneruensp°�,Py FY 14 RECIPIENT AGREEMENT— BOYS & Gnus CLUBS OF ADA COUNTY PAGE 4 OF 5 EXHIBIT A GYMNASIUM PLANS FYI4 RECIPIENT AGREEMENT -BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA COUNTY PAGE 5 OF 5 U) U �I c n Q 0 J LL.. Yiq 20.9C8618LzuS Inr311VJ IvOCl WAD gnfo s19O 9 5A�" elpAU 9,E) 9 sAoq 9,C 19lnsylsluwimo/Jse9egs�asgcp I �im I U) U �I c n Q 0 J LL.. Yiq 20.9C8618LzuS Inr311VJ IvOCl WAD gnfo s19O 9 5A�" elpAU 9,E) 9 sAoq 9,C 19lnsylsluwimo/Jse9egs�asgcp cn o?j U i; wa � N$ I z I mry I- w O i ry I s� 1 i O I i W.O VJ Q LU W W U t inr3! oivoOT JQIgQ se+J2sAoy 9Y'¢l wAg yL`J 8s6Cg 9V'C glincy vivo11' YIV o BE19 >102:3 try rus 4lallsys:asp::p a 0 td o?j T i; j P I z I I- w O i I .�. xx W Q O W.O VJ Q LU W W t inr3! oivoOT JQIgQ se+J2sAoy 9Y'¢l wAg yL`J 8s6Cg 9V'C glincy vivo11' YIV o BE19 >102:3 try rus 4lallsys:asp::p 2 W L j h � co NIV rME:8 6l W2115 0r311VN IV901".49490 q,o 7 ekq 9P E .Ao sVIr,4SAoa3�-Cl vinad's��awmoa..aueq,amf(f;p Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 24, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: $H PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Legal Dept.: Budget Amendment for Donation to Meridian Boys & Girls Club for Contribution of Fiscal Year 2014 Funds not to exceed $500,000.00 MEETING NOTES Community Item/Presentations Presenter Contact Info./Notes CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS 0 m a m s c m < m O. a N c=omas m y m 3 0 0 3 3 N m N 3 S c c p m cc=m °• N (p Cr m m Q m G N O y 3 a Q n 3 < G CL CL I m SD 6 CL O" O CL o cO ry 7C 3 a .s O m O 7 7 `G m O. 3 O 0 m to a z N 0 m 6 m c w 17 CL CL . CL m ° 5z 3 0 N G 3 p j S 0 mO = C O 7 3 n. m CD S a 0 " IQ y S. . CT C d a 3 O] o :° m m o. 3 S m C 3 CL a CD 3 N C Q O o S, oO o oS, N °0 < 3 H z s m a 3 m m C M W J 3 .p+ •+. as i � �0 N .=i O m ,G 3p_ N 3 m s a p 0 2 m Q on oa N c + m 0 '* n, N O 0 S m o O O O m - 3 O S 0 <0 � N •* �' aOfr O 90 0 o c nD S m 3 p= N p 0 S N f O O = C O 6 3 3 n = np c 3 c n � a M Oq p O n O 3 pp 3 S ° 3 O a 04 0 c = < s 3 m H o w a = n M S o n o 0 m a 3 s n 0 fD m 09 S � fD .-mss 3 o E°a C O N N O 3 m a V 3 v 3 a N= O n � N -pi p S N m 3 O O D N N S O m p S n p 3 3 _M O O _ 3 W= n m 3 n = 3 so n O � m 3 = 3 p S �• O< Opo vi d N =p O 3 N F 09 O O D �< C S O O_ (O1 Z 6 N 3 w N 7 Q o < C ,< < w Q N c D 3 L W C v 0 m m Z v m Z T O m E O m 3 o ffl 0 A 1220 a;a}(D! ( / CL o o 0 C \ a LD. ® /(~ e / § � , q /)_ r CL 17 / 9 ! CL @ - \ © 2 - \ \ \ ± \ \ {ET / ® 2 » « - %) : \ : ! 1220 a;a}(D! ( / CL o o 0 C \ a LD. ® r e / § � , q % c : El