Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2014-06-17
(::�E IDIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR t DA w a MEETING AGENDA City Council Chambers 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, June 17, 2014 at 6:00 PM Roll -Call Attendance X David Zaremba X Joe Borton X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird X Genesis Milam O Luke Cavener (arrived of 6:20 p.m.) X Mayor Tammy de Weerd 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Community Invocation by None 4. Adoption of the Agenda Adopted 5. Consent Agenda Approved A. Approve Minutes of June 3, 2014 City Council Meeting B. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Approval: : AZ 14-001 Ten Mile Center by Treasure Valley Investments, LLC Located South of W. Franklin Road on the East Side of S. Ten Mile Road Request: Annexation and Zoning of 120.69 Acres of Land with the R-8 (13.23 Acres), TN -C (26.11 Acres) and C -G (81.35 Acres) Zoning Districts C. Final Order for Approval: FP 14-021 Paramount Subdivision No. 27 by Brighton Investments, LLC Located Southwest Corner of N. Meridian Road and W. Chinden Boulevard Request: Forty (40) Building Lots and Two (2) Common/Other Lots on 11.36 Acres of Land in the R-8 Zoning District D. Final Order for Approval: FP 14-022 Revolution Ridge Subdivision No. 1 by Conger Management Located 1100 W. Riodosa Drive Request: Final Plat Approval Consisting of Forty -Five (45) Building Lots and Four (4) Common Lots on 14.24 Acres of Land in the R-4 Zoning District E. Final Order for Approval: FP 14-023 Sagewood Subdivision by Sagewood Overland, LLC Located South Side of W. Overland Road, Approximately 650 Feet West of S. Stoddard Road Request: Final Plat Approval Consisting of Two (2) Office Lots, Forty -Five (45) Residential Lots and Eight (8) Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda — Tuesday, June 17, 2014 Page 1 of 2 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Common Lots on Approximately 15.62 Acres of Land in the L -O and R-8 Zoning Districts F. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Baltic Place Addition Subdivision G. Resolution No. 14-996: A Resolution Approving the Transfer of the Assets and Liabilities of the Meridian Heights Water and Sewer District, Ada County, Idaho, to the City of Meridian, Idaho, Pursuant to the "Agreement for the Dissolution and Transfer of Assets and Liabilities from Meridian Heights Water and Sewer District to the City of Meridian; Settlement Agreement and Release." 6. Community Items/Presentations A. Fair Housing Presentation B. Impact of Housing Study for the Valley by Building Contractors of Southwest Idaho 7. Items Moved From Consent Agenda None 8. Department Reports A. Public Works Department: Meridian Heights Water Meter Construction Budget Amendment for the Not -to -Exceed Amount of $315,000.00 Approved B. Parks and Recreation Department: Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Amendment Regarding Grant Revenue for Settlers Village Square Phase 2 for a Not -to - Exceed Amount of $8,500.00 Approved 9. Future Meeting Topics None 10. Executive Session Per Idaho State Code 67-2345 (1)(c)(d)(f): (c) To Conduct Deliberations Concerning Labor Negotiations or to Acquire an Interest in Real Property, Which is Not Owned by a Public Agency, (d) To Consider Records that are Exempt from Disclosure as Provided in Chapter 3, Title 9, Idaho Code, and (f) To Consider and Advise Its Legal Representatives in Pending Litigation Into Executive Session at 7:10 p.m. Out of Executive Session at 7:38 p.m. Adjourned at 744Wp.m. 9'•38 p•rn. Meridian City Council Meeting Agenda - Tuesday, June 17, 2014 Page 2 of 2 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 A meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:00 p.m., Tuesday, June 17, 2014, by Mayor Tammy de Weerd. Members Present: Charlie Rountree , Keith Bird, Joe Borton, Genesis Milam, David Zaremba and Luke Cavener. Others Present: Bill Nary, Jaycee Holman, Bruce Chatterton, Tom Barry, Warren Stewart, Jeff Lavey, Chris, Chris Amenn, Steve Siddoway, Lori Den Hartog, Bruce Freckleton and Dean Willis. Item 1: Roll -call Attendance: Roll call. X David Zaremba X Joe Borton X Charlie Rountree X Keith Bird X Genesis Milam X Luke Cavener X Mayor Tammy de Weerd De Weerd: I'd like to welcome you to the City Council meeting. For the record, it is Tuesday, June 17th. It's 6:00 p.m. We will start with roll call attendance, Madam Clerk. Item 2: Pledge of Allegiance De Weerd: Okay. Item No. 2 is the Pledge of Allegiance. If you will all rise and join us in the pledge to our flag. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) Item 3: Community Invocation by De Weerd: We have no one here to lead us in the community invocation. Item 4: Adoption of the Agenda De Weerd: So, we will go to Item 4, which is adoption of the agenda. Rountree: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: One addition to the agenda or a note to be made. On Item 5-G, the resolution number is 14-996, and with that addition I move that we approve the agenda. Bird: Second. Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 2 of 24 De Weerd: I have a motion and a second to approve the agenda as noted. Madam Clerk, will you call roll. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, absent. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. De Weerd: Item 6-A is our fair housing presentation. I will -- Rountree: Do we want to do the Consent Agenda? Bird: Consent. De Weerd: Oh. Sure. I was just speeding through this evening. Rountree: It's okay. Item 5: Consent Agenda A. Approve Minutes of June 3, 2014 City Council Meeting B. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Approval:: AZ 14-001 Ten Mile Center by Treasure Valley Investments, LLC Located South of W. Franklin Road on the East Side of S. Ten Mile Road Request: Annexation and Zoning of 120.69 Acres of Land with the R-8 (13.23 Acres), TN -C (26.11 Acres) and C -G (81.35 Acres) Zoning Districts C. Final Order for Approval: FP 14-021 Paramount Subdivision No. 27 by Brighton Investments, LLC Located Southwest Corner of N. Meridian Road and W. Chinden Boulevard Request: Forty (40) Building Lots and Two (2) Common/Other Lots on 11.36 Acres of Land in the R-8 Zoning District D. Final Order for Approval: FP 14-022 Revolution Ridge Subdivision No. 1 by Conger Management Located 1100 W. Riodosa Drive Request: Final Plat Approval Consisting of Forty -Five (45) Building Lots and Four (4) Common Lots on 14.24 Acres of Land in the R-4 Zoning District E. Final Order for Approval: FP 14-023 Sagewood Subdivision by Sagewood Overland, LLC Located South Side of W. Overland Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 3 of 24 Road, Approximately 650 Feet West of S. Stoddard Road Request: Final Plat Approval Consisting of Two (2) Office Lots, Forty -Five (45) Residential Lots and Eight (8) Common Lots on Approximately 15.62 Acres of Land in the L- O and R-8 Zoning Districts F. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Baltic Place Addition Subdivision G. Resolution No. 14-996: A Resolution Approving the Transfer of the Assets and Liabilities of the Meridian Heights Water and Sewer District, Ada County, Idaho, to the City of Meridian, Idaho, Pursuant to the "Agreement for the Dissolution and Transfer of Assets and Liabilities from Meridian Heights Water and Sewer District to the City of Meridian; Settlement Agreement and Release." De Weerd: All Right. Okay. Yes. The Consent Agenda. Rountree: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: I move that we approve the Consent Agenda with the noted change in the previous motion and authorize the clerk to attest and the Mayor to sign. Bird: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second and I will actually have roll call attendance again -- or roll call again. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, absent. De Weerd: All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 6: Community Items/Presentations A. Fair Housing Presentation De Weerd: Okay. Now we are at 5-A and I will -- or 6-A and I will turn this over to Lori to present or to give an introduction to our presenter. Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 4 of 24 Den Hartog: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. We have invited Mr. Jerome Mapp from the city of Boise here this evening to do a presentation regarding the city of Boise's Fair Housing Task Force and all of the things that that task force does. The reason I have invited Jerome this evening is we are a partner, whether you are aware or not, we are a partner with the city of Boise on their Fair Housing Task Force. We support the fair housing campaign that they do and Jerome is the fair housing coordinator over there and we support this program through our community development block grant. We are required to affirmatively further fair housing in the City of Meridian and part of the way we are accomplishing some of our federal requirements is through this partnership with the city of Boise, so I wanted to take this opportunity to have Jerome talk to you a little bit about all the many different things that the task force is doing and some of what our grant dollars are going toward in this effort. So, with that I will turn it over to Jerome and you can come up to the podium. De Weerd: And welcome, Jerome. It's nice to have you in our Council chambers. Mapp: Thank you. This is the first time I have been before you. De Weerd: That's right. Mapp: And I like the Council chambers, too. De Weerd: Thank you. Now, if you will, please, state your name for the record we would appreciate it. Mapp: Yes, ma'am. Jerome Mapp. 1855 Danmore Drive, Boise, Idaho. 83712. De Weerd: Thank you. Mapp: Thank you. I'm the fair housing coordinator for the city of Boise. I'm under contract with the city. This will be my third year. Actually started 2002 -- 2012 and I'd like to let you know that the fair housing task force has one major mission and that is to educate the public in what fair housing is, so I have a short presentation. I welcome any questions as we go through this. Lori, do we have do they have the handout? Okay. The first thing that I want to bring to your attention and you have a handout here -- is what is fair housing and I will give you the quick and short version. As you look at the front page here is who is protected. Everyone in this building is protected under the fair housing code. The law. Somebody has some race, some color, some national origin, religion, sex, status or disability. Every person may not have all of those, but every person has at least one, so what that really means is that everyone in the United States is protected against discrimination. Let me back up a second. 1962 was the year -- July 2nd, actually, 1962, that President Johnson signed the Civil Rights bill. There will be a celebration next Saturday -- next Friday at the Boise zoo where a lot of people are coming together to celebrate that. Four years later the Fair Housing Act was signed. You can see here -- and what you can't do is prohibit -- denial of a dwelling, refusal to rent or sell. Back in the day when I was growing up they used to call it red lining where Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 5 of 24 you couldn't get insurance at the same price in another area of town. Just say that north Nampa had a red line around it and if somebody wanted to buy a home and receive insurance, your premium will be higher than the south side. And so the list goes on. So, what we try to do in our program, which you are part of and I thank you very much for placing that within your budget every year -- is that we try to educate the public on fair housing, so some of the things that we do is that we have our fair housing initiative -- and I will be going through that in a second. We receive funding for various cities, state agencies, that provide funding for the Fair Housing Initiative. We do training. We participate in part of the training with HUD and we also do it locally. We had training over in Nampa this year. We had a training at the HUD office on -- on accessibility. We have landlord training. So, we do that as well. And when I say we -- because it's a partnership. We have the City of Meridian, the city of Nampa, Boise City, Idaho Housing and Finance. We also have Idaho Department of Commerce. And those funds are funneled together to do the initiative, but also the entitlement cities like Meridian and like Nampa, they participated. Meridian last year sponsored the -- I think it was a landlords training -- wasn't that correct? Landlords training that we had over at Idaho State University -- rah rah -- graduate. Yes. And, then, also this year in Nampa we had that training. We also had partnered with -- it's called AMA, as Apartment Managers Association, and had a training for them over at the Oxford Inn in Boise. So, we look at Fair Housing Month and nationally Fair Housing Month is the month of April. I'm sure that you had the resolution regarding fair housing in Meridian. They do it in Nampa. The entitlement cities all do it. Not only because they want to, but also it is a requirement to receive federal funds. We also look at going to communities and being part of celebrations they may have, such as in Boise we are doing Progressive 4 this -- on the 28th of June. Last year we did events at Nampa and also in Caldwell. We haven't done one yet in Meridian and I have been working with Lori to let me know what events -- you know, it may be Dairy Days, it may be, you know, in the future it may be some other ones, but -- so that we can provide information. Now, as we start off on our task force we currently have three members. Craige Naylor just resigned -- has retired from the board after four years. We are in the process of additional individuals on our task force. You can see we have people from a diverse area of the community to guide the city in dealing with fair housing issues. Next, please. So, this is what we did in 2013. This is our -- we did an overview for the city of Boise and this is our overview. Tools of Life in Boise, they focused on disabilities, preparing a transition from high school to college. Jump down to State of the Child and that was targeting Hispanic population. We went to the World Refugee celebration last year and that's becoming a major issue in the state of Idaho regarding refugees and housing that they be discriminated against regarding housing, just to let them know what's happening. Next slide, please. One of the things in partnership that we partner with Health and Welfare, they have what they call a 211 line and if you have any issues regarding housing and other Health and Welfare issues -- and I'm slowly learning about the other issues they deal with -- you can call the number 211 and, then, what your concern is and they can refer you to the proper agency and they will be able to help you. If you look on the back sheet you will see that we have the top three here, health -- Idaho Human Rights Commission, Intermountain Fair Housing Council and, then, HUD are the three agencies to contact. Also there is Idaho Legal Aid that also provides some service. But Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 6 of 24 what we have done here is that through 211 we looked at the number of phone calls that came in during the year regarding fair housing. If you notice in April was the beginning of Fair Housing Month, we had 18 calls. We continued that officially until May 15th and I will tell you what we do, then -- so, that's -- May was 19, eight in June, then, it spiked up to 18 in July and, then, to 12 in August. We don't know exactly why those numbers have changed, we just know that those type of complaints were recorded with the 211 number. Now, one thing we did in 2013 that was different is that through Al announcements of impediments, it listed some things that the city of Boise should be paying attention to and so what the board decided to do is -- you know, we have expertise in our board with their background is where they work, their education, but there is a whole lot of other things that we don't know. So, what we decided to do was have a -- our guest speakers -- our speakers forum where we will call individuals in and let them tell us about their agency, how they are dealing with the issues of housing and we talked a little bit about fair housing and so these are individuals we talked to and just kind of briefly discuss a couple of these. We asked Mary Watson to come to talk to us about HOAs and CC&Rs. We would recognize that those are enforced by the individuals who live in those subdivisions, but historically in some areas they view those CC&Rs and HOA fees are -- to discriminate against individuals and so cities are in the process of reviewing those, we want to know exactly what Boise city was doing at that time. Planning and zoning. Another issue. I'm glad this is here at this time, because I did an analysis, oh, about ten years ago and we went -- worked with the city, the city of Nampa, and we went through the zoning and subdivision ordinance to identify if there was any issues regarding how the zoning ordinances affect or what affect there could be as violating fair housing. Nationally -- and I think in Idaho -- definitely in Idaho, because they passed a law to add into the Local Land Use Planning Act regarding group homes and define what group homes were. In the past, especially my past, when I was -- started out in planning in Pocatello, somebody wanted to have a group home and neighbors would be up in arms. I remember one lady saying -- it was a group of individuals who were impaired in some way and the lady said, well, what am I supposed to do if one of them were to come over and walk into my house and say it's mine, you know, and she was just terrified. So, education needs to be done to explain to people, you know, what the truth is and that will go only by personal feelings. As you well know in February of last year the city of Boise passed a sexual orientation or gender identity ordinance, so that's been in existence for one year. Be happy to tell you that there has been no complaints, no issues regarding fair housing or any discrimination, but we had the city -- Mary Ann Jordan and Steve Rutherford from the legal department explain to the board, you know, what was in the ordinance, how it worked, you know, who do you talk to if you feel even discriminated against and you will find in the first page of the handout I gave you that is only Boise. There has been other cities that have passed the ordinance, but we have the calls going to the police department and they handle that and so we have that information available as well. We had Elaine Clegg. Anna Park. We wanted to understand how to work with social media in getting the word out as well, so we had a meeting with him to talk about public outreach, how we could do it better. The relationship with the mayor's office. And so that was a great meeting. And, then, our last one we had for 2013 was Erik Kingston and his responsibilities with the IFHA. So, that was another great meeting. This year we have had individuals -- the mortgage Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 7 of 24 companies -- one of the big concerns is how our mortgage is processed, how do they deal with discrimination. We had someone from the refugee community to talk to them about -- and I think there is three different refugee organizations in Boise and we just talked and wanted to get an idea of the issues that they are dealing with as well. Now, as I mentioned we have a partnership. This is a list of our partners and I will kind of explain as we go through this slide you will see some of the things we have been working on. But, you know, looking at -- well, North by Northwest will be a good example. We did have to pay them to develop some radio and TV commercials. We had those produced. A video for TV. If they have a Spanish surname -- or Spanish sub titles and, then, we have our radio ads, which are in English and in Spanish. This year we had over a thousand radio and TV ads on all the major TV stations, except for Channel 7, because they are expensive. And, then, we also had English and Spanish radio stations. So, the awareness plan starts with a proactive message. So, we want to be positive in what we tell people regarding fair housing. We did our radio and TV ads. We have bus wraps in Boise and the Nampa routes and that's, basically, our fair housing poster on the back of the buses. We had them on bus benches. We had bus panels of our posters in English and Spanish on all the buses. We had posters made. Mary had an e-mail that went -- an a -memo that went out to everyone, outreach to various stakeholders and, then, the most important part of this program is that everything we produce we put on the IFHA website, it's called the Idaho Fair Housing Forum and so any city in the state of Idaho can download any information. They can change it, like the posters, the posters could be changed and -- and the local -- it's their community can be added and they can post -- they could develop their own posters. So, a lot of small cities say, well, you know, we can't afford to do posters, we can't afford to do information cards, we can't do radio ads, we can't do TV ads, too much to develop. Well, it's available and it's free for the taking. There is our fair housing poster. We hired Oliver Russell to design this for us and so this is our standard poster. This is the poster on the bus panel on the buses. These are the bus benches. This is the tailgate wrap. So, it kind of gives you an idea of getting that word out. The city of Nampa actually did billboards this year, too, and they wrapped their utility boxes last year with the poster. So, this is what we did this last year. We did -- we had radio and TV ads. Our other costs included pencils, information cards, and I left them in the car, so I'm going to bring them back and give them to Lori, so you can all see them. Our posters. We print those every year. When we go out and do one or our events we have a table and we have a banner that says fair housing and we have this information available for people to pick up. We also have candy, so that the kids have their parents come over so they can spend some time with us. Okay. Our total budget this year was 14,341. We receive money from the Idaho Board of Realtors, the various cities we talked about earlier and we had some money left over from last year. So, what we are doing right now is a slide of -- we had contact. So, in summary -- and I will just say what we are doing right now is preparing for next year's initiative. We are currently looking at partnering with Boise State University to give us some ideas of how we can get the word out even better. So, that's something we are working on. Actually, we had a task force meeting this morning and that was one of our main topics. So, proactive, positive outreach and to reduce housing discrimination, community based public-private partnership to review the analysis of impediments, making sure that we update the Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 8 of 24 action plan and so this is a continuous process. We have tried to grow it every year and I wanted to take this time to let you know as contributors to this program of what we are doing, what you're a part of in Treasure Valley. So, that's my presentation, Mayor. De Weerd: Thank you, Jerome. Council, any questions? Bird: I have none, Mayor. Milam: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes, Mrs. Milam. Milam: Thank you. I enjoyed that presentation and I am a landlord, so this is all very interesting information to me. My question to you is if -- if we know of a CC&R is -- that is -- that has language in it that is discriminatory, if there is somebody that contacts that association to get them changed or does it exist forever like that? Mapp: Well, this is -- that's a good questions, because that's one of our discussions that we have had. We know for sure that some communities actually read covenants for new subdivisions, so that's one piece of the puzzle. Second piece of the puzzle are those which have existed for years. The title company does not review those. So, the answer to your question is that if those are available -- or I should say if they are identified they should be taken off the books, because even though they may not enforce them, if someone feels they are discriminated against and they go back and look at the HOA or look at the CC&Rs and find language that shows they have been discriminated against, it's more likely that they could lose a case. Now, I'm not an attorney, but, you know, that -- that would be very important to strike them off the record. Milam: So, I have identified one. Who should I get that information to? Mapp: Well, we have -- that's a good question, too, because we have not identified any particular source. I would talk to your own attorney to ask that, but I think that having stricken off the record and identified that they are not a part of that document, I mean that's going to be the issue that -- Milam: It was a house that I was looking to buy and so I didn't buy the house. I don't own the property, but I read the CC&Rs and it was crazy. Mapp: Yeah. Well, let me just give you an example. If you decide to buy the home and you saw something that was turning against yourself, you would probably go to them and say, you know, you need to take this off the record and if they refuse, then, you may be able to take some action on it. But I'm not an attorney. I don't even play one on TV, so -- Milam: It would have more discriminated against you, than me, but -- it was ugly. Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 9 of 24 Mapp: Yeah. There is -- I have seen a couple and those were, basically, back in the late '50s, '60s and it makes you shutter. Milam: Okay. Thank you. Mapp: Okay. Zaremba: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba. Zaremba: Thank you, Jerome. I realize there are federal laws that are behind this and make it a good thing to do. Is there a local enforcement component to it that the cities have to provide? Mapp: Well, no. Boise city does not have enforcement. We don't have the authority to enforce. So, you're looking -- you look at your page two of the handout, the Equal Rights Commission is usually the first one that people go to. And, then, Intermountain Fair Housing Council and Ann Olsen is the new executive director and she has a different take on how to deal with these issues and that is discuss, negotiate, and working it out, versus the past director was more the opportunity of, you know, suing, because it was discrimination place. So -- and, then, also, as I mentioned, Idaho Delayed is another contact which we don't show on here, but those -- those are the enforcement individuals. De Weerd: Council, any other questions? Rountree: No. Thanks, Jerome, for the info. It was very good. Good to see you again Bird: Thank you. Mapp: Once again, I want to thank you. I know you're getting ready to go on your budget year, because it's just June, got to have this done in August. I appreciate and the board appreciates the contribution that the City of Meridian has placed into the program and just let you know that we will do everything we can to make you proud of what the task force has done and I also appreciate working with Lori. We worked -- actually we go back a couple years when she was over in Canyon county. But we worked together at fair housing forum, we could communicate on fair housing issues and we just thank you for that. De Weerd: Thank you Mapp: Thank you. Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 10 of 24 Den Hartog: Madam Mayor, I just have one final comment to add to that. The city of Boise, as Jerome has expressed, is very appreciative of the funds that -- that we have dedicated to this, but as the staff person here and a part-time staff person, I am extremely thankful for the support of the city of Boise and the city of Nampa in the endeavor, because we are an entitlement city and we are required to address this issue of fair housing. It is a huge, huge undertaking and not something that I had the expertise to deal with and not something that we had the ability in house to deal with. So, we greatly appreciated the partnership with the city of Boise and what they have brought to the table and it has been a collaborative effort with Boise, Nampa, and Meridian and we are -- we are very appreciative here on the staff side as well. Just wanted to add that. De Weerd: Thank you, Lori. And I think partnerships help all of us in being more effective and certainly leveraging those dollars. B. Impact of Housing Study for the Valley by Building Contractors of Southwest Idaho De Weerd: Okay. Item 6-B is also a presentation we have by the BCA and I will just ask Dave if you want to just come forward. Or do you have a special introduction as well? No? Yorgason: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, I asked him and he just said tell them hi. Out in the audience with me is Jeff Thompson, he is a home builder -- local home builder. Some of you know him. He is the president of the Building Contractors Association of Southwest Idaho this year and we certainly appreciate his service to the industry. So, he's here to allow me to have a little more air time, so I can try to cover the material for you and do this as efficient as we can. De Weerd: Thank you. Yorgason: What I have before you tonight is a presentation, which is really a summary of two presentations, so I will go through them both quickly for you and grant you the time you need for questions along the way or certainly at the end, whichever your choice may be. I'm going to see if I can pretend I know what I'm doing with this chart here. Den Hartog: And if it doesn't work, just -- Yorgason: All right. I'm looking for the clicker. I don't see it. It might have moved on me. It's a little small. I will make it work. If not I will have Bruce's help here. Okay. Thanks, Lori. Here we go. So, there is two presentations. One is a study that was done by the National Association of Home Builders of our local economy, specially the local impact -- economic impact of housing and the study was completed the end of last year and as the data -- I will go through the data source for you, but, basically, it was the building permits for all of Ada County and the impact of our local valley here. Secondly, Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 11 of 24 I have a local housing report and a little bit of a forecast for you what our future might look like. The data there is data of homes sold -- single family homes sold in the end of last year, as well as a little bit of update through May of this year. Bruce, I might need your help. There we go. Try that. So, the way the study works is this: The National Association of Home Builders looks at metropolitan service areas. The Boise MSA is actually made up of five counties and so you might ask, well, why are you studying five counties? Well, the way it works is this: You take the data for the building permits for all of Ada County, but we recognize that a builder may be building a home here in Meridian, however, his landscaper might live in Middleton or Emmett or somewhere outside of the county, so they will make money on their portion of the construction, take it back to their local community and spend a portion of those dollars on food or some goods or services in that section of the county, which is why the study works that way. Bruce, you want to help? Thanks. So, conventional wisdom is that when you have more jobs come to the valley you need more houses to provide those homes, those places to live. People to live. But also when you build new homes that also produces more jobs, too. And more contractors and so forth. Move it forward, Bruce. Click a couple times and go through here. So, there are three phases in this study. The first is called the construction phase. Over the course of construction you have jobs, you have materials, building permit fees and so forth that are paid and that's all directly attributed to what's called the construction phase of this study. The second is called the ripple phase where a portion of those dollars, again, in reference to the landscape where he might spend some of his dollars within the local economy. Not all. And I will get into a little more specifics on that. But those first two phases are only based on the first year. So, it's kind of like when you throw a rock out into the lake and you see a little bit of a ripple, well, those little ripples are just that, it's a secondary or third spending of those dollars, but we limit those dollars to just the first year. That's a little more of a conservative analysis, but that's the way the study is performed. The third is what's called the occupancy phase. So, once the home is sold or rented out, someone lives there, you take the income from the person or people that live in that home and those dollars are spent on an ongoing basis in the local economy. So, a little more of a picture form. Again, here is the construction phase. When you look at the model you have the inputs and the outputs. First are the inputs, the value of the construction and materials, wages, so forth, and, then, at closing you will have realtor commission fees, title fees, and so forth that are paid at closing and, then, also builders and developers pay permits, hookup fees, application fees, all attributed to the cost of housing. Those dollars were -- that analysis was all done here at the local level, reached out to all of our cities and counties and try to identify what the current permits were and fees at the time of December of 2013, which we recognize fees have changed here in Meridian for impact fees since then, but this is based on the information at December of 2013. If you'd back one step, Bruce. Thanks. The output would be the income for the local residents of the sale of those homes and the contractors, as well as the taxes, fees, and revenues that the local jurisdictions gain. Next. From there, then, of course those local dollars and taxes are spent here in the local economy. That is based on the study from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, they know what spending patterns are of our local citizens and based on that information they have identified local income and taxes that are generated. Again, a smaller ripple might happen two or three times within the first Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 12 of 24 year. Next. Occupancy phase. Again, you look at the household income. They spend a portion of their dollars on local business services. They pay their property taxes. And those dollars, then, spill out in local income for wages and salaries, as well as taxes. Next. So, assumptions in the model. Based on the analysis that we have performed there were 2,611 building permits -- single family residential building permits in Ada county in 2013. The average home price was approximately 260,000 dollars. Average raw lot cost -- I will explain that in a second -- is 25,000 dollars. The average for all the cities and counties for homes built -- the average is approximately 12,000 dollars for permits and impact fees. And annual property taxes is -- if you move the box -- is just under 3,000 dollars. Explaining average raw lot cost. What that is is not just the land, but it's also not what the builder pays -- they don't pay 25,000 for a finished lot either. What that equates to is you take the lot, but it's what's known as -- maybe in the valley as a paper lot or preliminary platted lot, wherein you have the land, you have the entitlement of the preliminary plat where engineering and application fees were paid, but no construction took place. So, that's the explanation there. So, quickly, again, we will have a construction phase, a ripple phase, an occupancy phase and, then, just for good measure we will show you what the ten year total might look like. Next. So, going one more. So, for single family residential construction, based on 2013 numbers of 2,611 building permits, the total local income generated in our valley is 310 million dollars. The local taxes collected is just over 37 million dollars. And local jobs is 5,493 and that's homes built in 2013. You can break down the jobs in the following categories. Clearly most of them are construction, 3,797. They also fall under the category such as wholesale, retail trade, and business and special services. Those are the top three categories. Next, please. Ripple phase. Again, this is just within the first year. A portion of the first year. There is an additional 153 million dollars of local income to our valley. Local taxes is an additional almost 11 million dollars. Local jobs nearly 3,000 jobs. You can break them out by those categories, too. Next, please. The ongoing effect, which is more of a support role of -- so, not any construction jobs here, but the ongoing annually, 72 million dollars of income. Local income. Wages -- under wages and such. Local taxes would be just over 13 million. And local jobs is 1,473. You can break them out by those categories. It's interesting -- let me take a step back here. The association did this study a few years back, including back in about 2006 for the industry and so we did a little comparison and it's interesting that people's spending habits have changed a little bit since 2006. There is actually more jobs -- in other words, more money spent on eating and drinking places today than maybe was taking place back in 2006. Next, please. Ten year total, 1.15 billion dollars of income to our local valley and 173 million dollars local taxes collected over a ten year period of time just on the homes that were built in 2013, along with 8,436 temporary jobs and 1,473 permanent ones. Someone might ask why so many temporary jobs. The answer is this: To a local builder who is building a house, to a realtor who sells the home, any contractor directly related to that house, once the home is built, they are paid for their job and the home sells, they are now out of work again. They have to take the risk and go do it again. And so that's the reality of being a small business owner. As we all understand taking the risk one more time, many of those jobs are temporary jobs in which they try to go do it again. Next, please. So, by comparison how does that fit with our local economy? If you take those 5,493 single family construction jobs, it's actually Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 13 of 24 -- we all know they are not one employer, but if it were one employer it's as big as the third largest employer in the county. According to the state of Idaho Department of Labor Statistics at the end of 2013, St. Luke's is the largest employer with 7,600 jobs. Micron Technology 5,900. Again, single family residential is 5,493. Boise State and Meridian School, Boise School District, St. AI's, Albertson's HP, if you follow the list. Again, if you compare and go back to the past of 2006, Micron, the housing industry, Alberton's, HP are all about half the number of jobs what we had in 2006, even though we had a summary coverage, nowhere near what we were before. Interestingly, though, St. Luke's, Boise State, Meridian schools, Boise schools, they all have more jobs today than they had back in 2000. They have more than recovered to where they were at that point in time. Next, please. So, we know those are the positives. We also know -- and especially here at the city we know that there is some infrastructure cost, too, in fire and police protection. We have garbage, parks, roads and so forth. Next, please. So, based on the statistics the data as provided from the local cities to the U.S. Bureau of Census and Statistics, this is the information which they obtained, broken down by category this is the annual expense -- I think it's annual. Yeah. Annual expense per housing unit. And we have, oh, by the way, this information on multi -family as well. I have chosen to focus this presentation on single family, but if you have any questions at a later date I could certainly provide that data if you're interested in multi- family, too. So, the total single family is 2,667 dollars per home annually. However, we also know it takes capital expenditures -- next, please -- to build schools, hospitals, and bigger projects and these are the dollars it takes to build on a per house basis each of those items, total 14,768 dollars per home, single family. Next, please. So, now we know what the total benefit is, income, jobs and so forth. We also know what the costs are. The natural question would, then, be does growth pay for itself. Next, please. The question is, yes, it does, based on the information in 2013. If you want to click to the next one it shows this in a chart form. It only shows in the first year, but each continuous year it actually gets better and better based on the taxes that are paid, the income that's generated and so forth based on the costs were, again, this is 2013 information. So, that's the good news. Next please. So, that is the end of my first little presentation. I would be glad to roll right into the second one if you would like, unless you have any quick questions, but the second presentation is my local housing report. Okay. Next, please. This shows -- a few slides. I just want to go through a few slides and give you a quick summary of each slide for you. Sales, inventory, maybe the trend where we are headed. This -- all this information comes from Jerry Webb. He has a little service that he provides that I subscribe to. All this is from Multiple Listing Services. So, this is a history of sales -- all new and existing home sales in Ada County. You can see clearly that we had a nice little average run for the first few years of '99 through 2003. The spike hit and, then, the fell hit. 2008 was the bottom for sales. We have had a nice steady increase in sales every since and in 2013 the total sales we 8,124. Next, please. If you break those sales down by existing and new construction -- I will focus on the pink bars, that's new construction. Well, back up. You can see, again, 2008 was the bottom for existing sales, the light blue, however, the bottom of the new construction sales was actually 2011. It's taking a little bit longer for new construction to find its bottom and recover through this mess that we had. And if you do a little comparative analysis you can also see that total sales of 8,124 is actually a little Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 14 of 24 more than what we had in 2003, which might be more of a normal year. However, new construction sales were still far below what we had in 2002 or 2003, so maybe there is a little bit more room for sales looking forward to the future. Next, please. This chart is a little busy, but I will quickly kind of summarize it for you. The pink bars are 2013, what we call pending sales, which is a forecast of what sales might look like and the light blue is for 2014 and, again, pink bars being 2013. Normally you see sales peak in the spring and, then, kind of fall off through the fall and summer and that is true again in 2014. However, pending sales have lagged significantly in new construction this year compared to last year. You can see the pending sales are -- for new construction are down about 28 percent for all of Ada County, compared to last year. Next, please. Again, this chart is a little busy, but I will do a quick explanation. Follow the horizontal lines. What we all know is prices have gone up quite a bit since 2012 and 2013. We have had 2012 and '13 both, we had an average of 15, 16 percent increase in our home values. Again, this is new construction, but existing is pretty similar in those numbers. Next, please. However, if you look at the numbers comparing 2013, 2014, year over year percent change, you can see that last month in May we did not have a significant increase in price. Ten percent is still a good number, but it's not this continuous 15 to 17 percent increase. I think there is a reason why. Again, pending sales might be a leading indicator inventory is catching up -- and you will see in a little bit. Next, please. This chart is the overall inventory chart for all of Ada County over year over year. Quick summary is this: 2008 was the peak and every year the inventory levels dropped year over year until 2013, where we found the bottom in overall housing inventory and has a steady rise and, then, again 2014 is higher than 2013. Interestingly, 2014 levels today, end of May, are the same as where they were in 2011. Something to think about. Next, please. New construction even more of a dramatic drop in inventory. Sales were down. Inventory was also down. Couldn't get loans, whatever the case may have been. And 2008 again, peak, drop, inventory levels year over year over year until the bottom was -- again, about June of 2013 we have had an increase in inventory since then. That's also keeping up with sales, but also the inventory levels. 2014 it jumped up quite a bit and we are now newly 2009 levels for new construction inventory in Ada County. Next, please. This breaks down the total inventory analysis by distress sale. Quick summary is this: We are nearly recovered back to normal. The last bar represents May -- yeah. it's May and it says that 93 percent of inventory for sale -- all homes for sale in Ada County are normal home sales versus the distress sales that have been out there before. A normal market might be in the range of four to five percent and we are at about six to seven percent today. Next, please. Historically 2012 and '13 were ugly years. If you look back at the peak or the valley, whatever you want to call it, Ada County was around 55 to 60 percent of total sales of -- were distressed and Canyon county was actually closer to 88 percent of sales distressed. We have made a lot of progress. This also tells me that -- and, again, this is the end of 2013 number. This tells us that Canyon county is about one year behind of where Ada County is today. Next, please. This chart shows a month's supply, kind of a rolling average. I have intentionally did the rolling average, so you could kind of blend some of the peaks and valleys, the spikes. Clearly back in '05, '06 we were really low on inventory, had one or two month supply. A normal market might be five to six months supply of homes, just for your point of reference. We had peaks and valleys through the ugly time, including Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 15 of 24 government stimulus and such, but now we are around 6.2 month supply of homes new construction. So, that's maybe okay. Maybe a little high. But that's where we are today in all of Ada County. Next, please. This chart breaks out that same statistic by price category. Yellow is Ada County, blue is Canyon county. Interestingly, there are a lot of homes currently on the market in the lowest price category of 120 to 160. Likewise, there are quite a few in the 160 to 200 price category. And we are watching that. We are not exactly sure what's going on there. We think that most of those are in the Kuna market, not -- there are, of course, some homes in Meridian for sale below 200,000, but -- for new construction homes. But this is something of concern. There are a lot of homes for sale and there has just been a recent flood of homes on the market, so we are going to be watching that closely. Again, a five to six month supply of homes would be healthy. If you look in the price categories of around 300,000, maybe 250 to 350, those are healthy markets there. Next, please. Affordability is always a concern and quickly this is -- this will show you that affordability is becoming a greater concern. We are up around the -- a number of 25 percent -- I'm not sure exactly what that means, other than maybe it's a percent of income to pay or something like that. But primarily because of the -- not because interest rates are moving, but because of home prices moving up so much that's now becoming a concern for the builders related to affordability. Next, please. This chart shows existing affordability. It's hovered around 11, 12, 15 percent, which would be a healthy market. There is a big gap between home prices new and existing. In fact, probably too big of a gap and cites to the existing being a little more stronger than new construction over the coming months here. Next, please. Just a couple more slides and I will be done. This slide here shows a trend line. The yellow line is really a nice benchmark to follow. This is not new construction, this is total market inventory, and so if you go back to the year 2000, this should be considered maybe a normal year, and you put a trend line of an average 3.7 percent increase in home price year over year, that yellow line represents the average increase year over year. The blue represents total sales. The pink line is the one I more or less like, because it excludes the distress sales and that's maybe more of a true sales price and you can see clearly in 2004, '5, '6, 7 -- even '8, '9 and '10 we were above the trend line. We overcorrected in 2011, '12, and we have almost come back to the trend line. So, it might be something that maybe just think that maybe our price has come back to where it should be. Next, please. This graphic just shows that in the last few years we didn't build enough houses to meet the population growth and demand of this county. Long term there is more and more of a need for housing, regardless of the type of housing, single family or multi -family. There is a need for housing in this country today. Next, please. In conclusion, we are watching prices closely. We are watching sales closely. We are watching inventory closely. I think that we have -- I will use the word stabilized. We are going through a stabilization period and we have over the last several months. I really don't see a significant price increase in new construction over the next six months or a year. If we do I'm a little bit worried it could be another bit of a bubble building, especially if we have inventory shortly following, then, that clearly would be a form of a bubble. Existing inventory is coming online. You see a month's supply of homes is building, all indicators that, okay, if we stop here we are okay, but if more inventory is approaching, then, that's a bit of a concern. Some of the wild cards. Lot inventory, as we all know, has been short for the last few years, but there were quite a Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 16 of 24 few lots coming into the market here this spring and summer. That will help level out the shortage of lots out there. Interest rates will affect affordability for everyone. Especially the entry level buyer. And there is forecast and interest rates could easily jump a full one percent or more a year from now. Those are all forecasts. We don't know what will really happen. But if that does happen there is a generation out there that's scared of seven percent interest rates, let alone five percent interest rates and they don't -- they will have to adjust to that. Jobs. We need good paying jobs and I want to stand here and say thank you to you here the City of Meridian and all of our local jurisdictions for all that they do to try to help encourage good paying jobs in our valley. We need good paying jobs. We need jobs, but especially good paying jobs to help sustain the housing market. We are concerned as an industry about inflation. As one point of reference I have talked to several contractors and on the new development side we are currently seeing about a 15 percent price increase for new construction -- for development construction, such was water, sewer, pipe, streets, concrete and so forth from last fall until now. So, in less than one year period we have already seen about a 15 percent increase in costs. Part of that is because materials are going up, part of it is because contractors are no longer doing it for free and they are actually earning a wage. Last piece is government regulation, both on a national and local level. Every regulation has a direct impact on the affordability of housing and we appreciate everything here at the City of Meridian that you do when you consider your -- the regulations that are imposed here to make sure there is balance in the housing affordability. Next, please. That is the end of my presentation. I appreciate your allowing us to stand here and give us some time and share both of these reports with you. I'm actually going to several cities to make this similar presentation. Meridian was the first. Boise will soon follow. And a couple of the cities have expressed interest in this material as well. Stand for any questions you might have and, again, thank you for the time. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Dave, what -- what is the time frame of spec homes selling? New homes? Is it 30 days? Forty-five day? How long are they staying on the market? Yorgason: Madam Mayor and Councilman Bird, I have talked to a lot of agents -- especially in good selling communities, like Paramount and others -- and don't want to pick on Paramount, it's just a very good subdivision -- that has very good sales. Agents are starting to get a little bit nervous, because their builders are starting to ask questions like how come my home isn't sold yet, because it's now finished. So, I think some builders might have been a little bit spoiled. I will use that word. I hope that's okay, Jeff. But I think there is a sense the last couple years where if you build it it will sell right away, because the inventory was low, but as the inventory has picked up we are seeing homes on the market a little bit longer than we have seen for the past two or three years. To answer the direct question directly, I think it depends. It depends if it's a spec home and where the location might be. Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 17 of 24 Bird: Price range. Yorgason: And price point as well. if you're building in that sweet spot of the 250 to 350 thousand, I think you're safer and those homes, typically, as long as it's quality built and you're not asking an outrageous price per square foot or something, you're getting a fair return on your sale, the home should sell within a few months or even less. We know that during the Parade of Homes many builders had a successful Parade of Homes and that's one example. However, if you're building in the upper price range or if you're building in a -- called a B or a C location, I would expect your home to sit a little bit longer. And so build in interest reserve, because it most likely will sit a little bit longer. Bird: Follow up, Mayor? De Weerd: Uh-huh. Bird: On your first deal regarding all the -- I would like to see -- and while I realize builders -- home builders don't have anything to do with commercial, I would like to see the jobs and the dollars with the commercial and the homes, what brings it in here. I think people -- the jobs and stuff would way surpass St. Luke's. I'd like to see it as a overall construction deal. Yorgason: Madam Mayor and Councilman Bird, I appreciate that. And we can kind of go back and review. If you added the multi -family section of this I believe it does exceed or right at and that's not including any of the office or other commercial aspects as well. De Weerd: You know, Dave, I would also say in your last slide where you mentioned the wild card, I think what drives price probably more than that -- and you kind of have it under lot inventory, but it's price of land and what people are actually offering for land. It's -- it's scary and it's -- it's sometimes offensive how -- how -- and that is the biggest influencer I think on a lot of this. Yorgason: Madam Mayor, I'm not going to -- I agree with you. It's certainly a big factor. I would add that sometimes -- and I'm in the middle of this. As many of you know, that's my business is land development. I have done this for a few years, so I will just put it that way. De Weerd: Yeah. We kind of know that. Yorgason: I kind of know this corner of the market. When I hear numbers thrown out like 90,000 an acre or some big number, my first thought is -- I used to think, wow, what are they doing. Here we go again. But I have also learned that price per acre is not always the right measure for discussion. The reason why is so many times there are different factors, like off -sight costs and density that come into play of the equation, so that 90,000 an acre might actually make a lot of sense, where in another site a half mile Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 18 of 24 down the road would make very little sense, because of the added cost to run utilities there. I also believe there are some protective measures in the market place today that were not in place back in 2005 and '6 when we got hit pretty hard. Specially bank financing. Banks are not lending today like they were back then. They would lend with their eye closed, frankly, back then and we personally had many lenders approach us, try to just -- whatever it takes to get our business and that's not happening today. Still banks today -- on a few occasions they do lend on land, but most of the cases they are not lending on acquisition -development loans and that's actually holding back and only allowing some of the -- maybe I will call them the big four or five still the biggest players of our valley today, because he who owns the land really is controlling the future housing of this valley. Rountree: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Yes, Mr. Rountree. Rountree: Dave, I understand that your presentation is primarily single family residences. Do you have similar kinds of information on multi -family? We see an awful lot of multi -family coming into the market. I don't know what the future is for that. Is it more or are we at a point where vacancy rates are resulting in maybe less investment in that? How does it play in the market? Yorgason: Madam Mayor and Council -- Rountree: That would be very interesting to get as well. Yorgason: Madam Mayor and Councilman Rountree, sorry I interrupted you there. Rountree: That's fine. Yorgason: Short answer is yes. I don't have a full presentation for multi -family, but I do have all the data analysis from the economic impacts and the cost associated with it, so that first presentation, I have all that for multi -family. The second half of the presentation I can give you some anecdotal now and I could probably even do a little bit more research and provide that for you as well. But I can tell you that just from anecdotals from talking to various investors who are involved with four-plex multi -family type communities, the vacancy rates are about as low as they have ever been still today. There is a recognition -- and I really attribute this to smart savvy business owners here where they recognize that the trend is towards higher interest rates. It will impact affordability of housing. New construction is still quite expensive to build an affordable home with the lot prices, the land, whatever the contributing factors are, which they are all factors, but land is a big part of that. At the end of the day somebody who is just out of college or some first time home buyer is going to struggle affording a 250,000 dollar home. Clearly that's the case, especially here in Meridian. Adding to that there has been a shift in buyer preferences. The new generation -- not entirely, but a greater percentage of them are okay with renting a little bit longer. They really are Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 19 of 24 okay with renting and not taking on the burden of debt and so because of that it's also market driven, which is why there is such low vacancy rates. Rountree: Thank you. Yorgason: So, there is still demand, especially in a nice location like -- frankly, anywhere here in the City of Meridian. I bet I see e-mails and phone calls -- at least two or three a week -- people asking me do you have any property that I could do a multi- family project here in Meridian, four-plex or whatever, because they have a demand for it. Rountree: Thank you. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: Dave, it was a great presentation. I really enjoyed it. My question is on the first part and I like how you were able to really group all five counties together and it kind of begged the question in my head is are you able to illustrate how big of an economic driver to the surrounding counties the new home construction in Ada brings? Are you able to demonstrate that because we are building so much in Ada County that's actually driving the economy in some of these surrounding counties? And, if so, what is that amount? Yorgason: Madam Mayor, Councilman Cavener, I don't have that date, but I can ask for that data, see what they have. It's pretty technical. When I looked at the report -- and I could even give the raw data report if you really want it, but the back half is full of formulas. I mean it's very economic raw level information, which is -- I say thank you, give me the summary version, which is what I'm providing to you here. You know, the thought crossed my mind not only -- to anticipate the question not only countywide, but maybe citywide. Cavener: Sure. Yorgason: I can tell you that nearly 40 percent of the building permits in 2013 were in Meridian. De Weerd: Well, we could tell you. Yorgason: But I bet you know that. It's not half, but it's more than a third. Quite a few of the building permits were here. But clearly not all of the builders live in Meridian; right? So, they take their wages to where ever they live in Meridian, Boise, Eagle, where ever they live and they spend some of the money here. They may go out and eat -- to eat a Subway or they go to Home Depot and buy a hammer or whatever. I should say -- back up a little bit. During the ripple effect phase not all dollars are spent here Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 20 of 24 and certainly not all dollars spent here are recognized in the equation. For example, if a builder is feeling good, he's sold a few homes and he wants to now finally go buy a new pickup truck, that pickup truck is not included in this calculation, because pickup trucks are not made in the valley. So, that portion of expenditure is excluded from -- from the ripple effect, if that gives any indication. To your point, I can ask and see what percentage of Ada County ripples out. Likewise, the question could be asked if -- you know, the homes that are built in Canyon county, what impact is there here in Ada County. Of course there would be some of that, too. Cavener: Okay. Great. De Weerd: Any other questions? Well, thank you for your presentation and certainly for the information and we appreciate you coming here tonight and sharing it. Yorgason: You're welcome. Thank you all. De Weerd: And thank you, Jeff, even -- oh, he left. Bird: He left. Yorgason: He told me he had a 7:00 o'clock appointment, so he had to -- De Weerd: He has been behind you and I hadn't noticed. Yorgason: I have left a copy here for you -- electronic copy. And if you have further questions you can always reach out to me as well. De Weerd: Thank you. Yorgason: Thank you. Item 7: Items Moved From Consent Agenda De Weerd: Okay. There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda. Item 8: Department Reports A. Public Works Department: Meridian Heights Water Meter Construction Budget Amendment for the Not -to -Exceed Amount of $315,000.00 De Weerd: So, we will move to Item 8-A, which is under our Public Works Department. Barry: Good evening, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. Tonight we have a budget amendment for your consideration. I want to give you a little bit of background about this amendment before we ask for your action on it. You may recall the middle Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 21 of 24 part of last year we entered into a contract with the Meridian Heights Water and Sewer District and Mr. Centers called a three -party agreement. That agreement obligated each of those three parties to perform certain obligations and all obligations so far have thus been met. The vote of the district to dissolve was held. As you know the results of that were to dissolve. Mr. Centers, the developer, and prominent landowner made the connections for both water and sewer to the district. That's been done. He has posted his bond for the connection fees. That's been done. The City of Meridian has gone in and is now upgrading some of the infrastructure and placing in meter pits and meters as well into the subdivisions out there. The budget amendment for your consideration is to cover the cost for the meter pits and installation of the boxes and that type of infrastructure associated with our project here. This was all contemplated in the three - party agreement. Exhibit L actually established a pro forma fund, which were identified to cover these costs and I will just point out on Exhibit L we had about 450,000 dollars earmarked for water system improvements as an allowance to the City of Meridian for this agreement. The budget amendment request is for 315,000 dollars, so it's less, leaving about 135,000 dollars of additional allowance for us to work with in regard to the -- any additional water system improvement costs that might need to be incurred by the city. Currently this is a no net increase budget request, because, essentially, one of the projects in Public Works that was scheduled for this year, the Ten Mile sewer diversion trunk, was canceled since we were not able to find cooperative property owners to provide easements for that particular trunk and that's 200,000 dollars. There was 115,000 dollars in savings that we achieved -- two savings, actually, from the 8th Street sewer main replacement project, so we'd like to, essentially, take those two funds, which were already set up and approved by City Council as part of our FY -14 budget and just, essentially, reallocate them and place them into the budget line item, which would allow us to, then, have access to those funds and utilize those funds for this particular project. So, it's, essentially, a no net increase to the City of Meridian Public Works Department budget, but the funds, however, are going to be and have been allocated from the three party agreement as described in Exhibit L to the agreement. So, that's, essentially, all I have for you tonight for your consideration and would request your favorable consideration of the 315,000 dollar reallocation in budget amendment form. Thank you. De Weerd: Thank you, Tom. Council, any questions? Bird: I have none. De Weerd: Okay. Borton: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Borton. Borton: If there are no questions, I would move that we approve Item 8-A, the Public Works budget amendment for the Meridian Heights water meter construction in an amount not to exceed 315,000. Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 22 of 24 Rountree: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Madam Clerk, will you call roll. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: Thank you. Barry: Thank you. B. Parks and Recreation Department: Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Amendment Regarding Grant Revenue for Settlers Village Square Phase 2 for a Not -to -Exceed Amount of $8,500.00 De Weerd: Item 8-B is under our Parks and Recreation Department. I will turn this over to Steve. Siddoway: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the Council. Pleased to let you know that we have been successful at applying for and receiving a grant with help from our friends at the Meridian Tennis Association. As you know we have an active construction project for the Settlers Park tennis complex. We have been working with the Meridian Tennis Association on that project for a number of years. With their help we have approached the U.S. Tennis Association and applied for grant funds. They -- we have received an award letter from them for 7,500 dollars. In addition to that, the Idaho Tennis Association has also offered an additional thousand dollars and we are coming before you to just ask for spending authority on those grant funds received. I will stand for any questions. De Weerd: Thank you, Steve. Council, any questions? Bird: I have none. Rountree: I have none. Cavener: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Cavener. Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 23 of 24 Cavener: Seeing no questions, I move that we approve Item 8-B, a budget amendment from the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department for an amount not to exceed 8,500 dollars. Zaremba: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Madam Clerk. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. De Weerd: All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 9: Future Meeting Topics De Weerd: Item 9 is for any discussion from Council, any topics for future agendas. Item 10: Executive Session Per Idaho State Code 67-2345 (1)(c)(d)(f): (c) To Conduct Deliberations Concerning Labor Negotiations or to Acquire an Interest in Real Property, Which is Not Owned by a Public Agency, (d) To Consider Records that are Exempt from Disclosure as Provided in Chapter 3, Title 9, Idaho Code, and (f) To Consider and Advise Its Legal Representatives in Pending Litigation De Weerd: Okay. Item 10 is Executive Session. I would entertain a motion to adjourn into Executive Session. Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we go into Executive Session as per Idaho State Code 67-2345 (1)(c), (1)(d) and (1)(f). Milam: Second. Rountree: Second. De Weerd: I have a motion and several seconds to adjourn into Executive Session. Madam Clerk. Roll Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, yea; Milam, yea; Cavener, yea. Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 24 of 24 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (7:10 p.m. to 7:38 p.m.) De Weerd: Okay. Do I have a motion to come out of Executive Session. Bird: So moved. Rountree: Second. De Weerd: All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: Any further business in front of the Council? Bird: I have none. De Weerd: Then do I have a motion to adjourn? Bird: So moved. Rountree: Second. De Weerd: All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:38 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR TAMMY DE WEERD DATE APPROVED ATTEST: JAYCEE HOLMAN, CITY CLERK Meridian City Council June 17, 2014 Page 24 of 24 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (7:10 p.m. to 7:38 p.m.) De Weerd: Okay. Do I have a motion to come out of Executive Session. Bird: So moved. Rountree: Second. De Weerd: All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: Any further business in front of the Council? Bird: I have none. De Weerd: Then do I have a motion to adjourn? Bird: So moved. Rountree: Second. De Weerd: All those in favor say aye. All ayes. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:38 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILLE F THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR,,�44MY DE WEERD DATE APPROVED ATTEST: 1 -015"cuvr,1.o q•X /I T/1 � 10Y•• W C P 9�,rPNr£R oS De tPETSJ �< Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 17, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: A. Approve Minutes of June 3, 2014 City Council Meeting MEETING NOTES gAll""HIED CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 17, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: 5B PROJECT NUMBER: AZ 14-001 ITEM TITLE: Ten Mile Center B. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Approval:: AZ 14-001 Ten Mile Center by Treasure Valley Investments, LLC Located South of W. Franklin Road on the East Side of S. Ten Mile Road Request: Annexation and Zoning of 120.69 Acres of Land with the R-8 (13.23 Acres), TN -C (26.11 Acres) and C -G (81.35 Acres) Zoning Districts MEETING NOTES I -MJ CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER C%WERIDIAN -- ID/IiO In the Matter of the Request for Annexation and Zoning of 120.69 Acres of Land with the R-8 (20.76 acres), TN -R (8.24 acres); TN -C (10.32 acres) and C -G (81.35 acres) zoning districts, Located on the East Side of S. Ten Mile Road, Midway Between W. Franklin Road and I-84, by Treasure Valley Investments, LLC. Case No(s). AZ -14-001 For the City Council Hearing Dates of- May 6, and June 3, 2014 (Findings on June 17, 2014) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 6, 2014, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 6, 2014, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Properly Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 6, 2014, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 6, 2014, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current Zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted April 19, 2011, Resolution No. 11-784 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). AZA4-001 -1- 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Planning Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 6, 2014, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for annexation and zoning is hereby approved with the requirement of a development agreement containing the provisions listed in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 6, 2014, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Two (2) Year Development Agreement Duration The development agreement shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the City within two (2) years of the City Council granting annexation and/or rezone (UDC 11-513-31)). A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the City if filed prior to the end of the two (2) year approval period (UDC 11-513-3F). E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of May 6, 2014 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OP LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). AZ -14-001 -2- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the ' / vday of 2014. COUNCIL PRESIDENT CHARLIE ROUNTREE VOTED—r COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT KEITH BIRD VOTED–T-6,– OTED.(/ –6, -COUNCIL COUNCILMEMBER DAVID ZAREMBA VOTED_r COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER GENESIS MILAM VOTED (/ a�— MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD VOTED (TIE BREAKER) q Mayor Tam Weerd 4—: Attest:IA Nonu4 F,&LJaycee AlCity Clerku� znE ,�aW Copy served upon Applicant, The Planning Division, Public Works Department and City Attorney. Dated:�0 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). AZ -14-001 -3- STAFF REPORT BEARING DATE: TO: FROM: 01110121411 I. SUMMARY I IMII131W.1 May 6, 2014 Mayor & City Council Sonya Watters, Associate City Planner (208)884-5533 AZ -14-001 — Ten Mile Center �ER� OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST The applicant, Treasure Valley Investments, LLC, has applied for annexation and zoning (AZ) of 120.69 acres of land from the RUT zoning district in Ada County to the R-8 (13.23 acres), TN -R (11.76 acres); TN -C (14.34 acres) and C -G (81.35 acres) zoning districts in the City. II. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed AZ with the requirement of a development agreement containing the provisions listed in Exhibit B in accord with the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Exhibit D of the Staff Report. The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on February 20. and March 20.2014. At the public hearing on March 20. 2014. the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject AZ request. a. Summary of Commission Public Hearing: L In favor: Eric Davis. Retail West Properties: Becky McKay. Engineering Solutions. LLP: ii. In opposition: Jeanette Ockerman (speaking for group): Dennis Gerosin: Dawn Downum: Cinde Atwood: Ron Hohnstein: Jennifer Johnson: Margaret Moser: Christine Lambing: Steve Osburn: John Mabbutt: Doug Thompson: Angie McNulty iii. Commenting: Sarah Weekes iv. Written testimony:.Iim Wolf: Gary & Kay Forst Jeanette Ockerman: a petition signed by adjacent residents (in opposition of the high level of residential density & the access to Waltman Lane): Craig Downum: Dawn Downum: Sharon Osborn: Maggie Weeks: Margaret Moser: and Dave Dansereau. v. Staff presenting application: Sonya Watters vi. Other staff commenting on application: None b. Key Issues) of Discussion by Commission: i. Traffic impacts on the adjacent rural residential neighborhood and roads at the southeast corner of the site: ii. Concern regarding the potential for 300 dwelling units to develop in the TN -C district vs. spread out over the TN -C and C -G districts (wording of DA provision #4.1.6 in Exhibit A.6): iii. Impact of additional residential dwellings in this area on the school system: and iv. The importance of creating a transition and compatible uses at an appropriate scale adjacent to existing residential properties. c. Key Commission Changes) to Staff Recommendation: i. Modify condition #4.1.4 as requested by the applicant as shown in Exhibit A.6: and ii. Modify condition #4.1.6 as requested by the applicant as shmvn in Exhibit A.6. d. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: L None Ten We Center AZ -14-001 PAGE I IMII1;30W.1 III. PROPOSED MOTION Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number AZ-14-001as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 6, 2014, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number AZ -14-001, as presented during the hearing on May 6, 2014, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial.) Continuance I move to continue File Number AZ -14-001 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location: The subject property is located south of W. Franklin Road on the east side of S. Ten Mile Road, in the northwest t/4 of Section 14, Township 3 North, Range 1 West. B. Applicant: Treasure Valley Investments, LLC 4313 Mansfield Drive Danville, CA 94506 Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 2 01 III. PROPOSED MOTION Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number AZ-14-001as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 6, 2014, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number AZ -14-001, as presented during the hearing on May 6, 2014, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial.) Continuance I move to continue File Number AZ -14-001 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location: The subject property is located south of W. Franklin Road on the east side of S. Ten Mile Road, in the northwest t/4 of Section 14, Township 3 North, Range 1 West. B. Applicant: Treasure Valley Investments, LLC 4313 Mansfield Drive Danville, CA 94506 Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 2 1*4441130W.1 C. Owner: Same as applicant D. Representative: Becky McKay, Engineering Solutions, LLP 1029 N. Rosario Street, Ste. 100 Meridian, Idaho 83642 E. Applicant's Statement/Justification: Please see applicant's narrative for this information. V. PROCESS FACTS A. The subject application is for annexation & zoning. A public hearing is required before the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council on this matter, consistent with Meridian City Code Title 11, Chapter 5. B. Newspaper notifications published on: February 3 and 17, 2014 (Commission); April 14, and 28, 2014 (City Council) C. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: January 28, 2014 (Commission); April 10, 20�City Council) D. Applicant posted notice on site by: February 9, 2014 (Commission); April 19, 2014 (City Council) VI. LAND USE A. Existing Land Use(s): This property is currently being used as agricultural land; no structures exist on the site. B. Character of Surrounding Area and Adjacent Land Use and Zoning: North: Vacant land in the development process, zoned RUT in Ada County South: Vacant land in the development process, zoned C -G; and low-density residential uses (Primrose Sub.), zoned R in Ada County East: Single-family residential properties, zoned R-4; and a school, zoned R-4 West: Ten Mile Road and vacant/agricultural property, zoned C -C C. History of Previous Actions: NA D. Utilities: a. Location of sewer: Sanitary sewer main stubs intended to provide service to the subject property currently exists in S. Ten Mile Road. b. Location of water: Water main stubs intended to provide service to the subject property currently exists in S. Ten Mile Road, and are currently being planned as part of the TM Creek project to the north. c. Re -use pressurized irrigation water: Re -use irrigation water service is currently stubbed into the subject property along S. Ten Mile Road d. Issues or concerns: None E. Physical Features: 1. Canals/Ditches Irrigation: The Kennedy Lateral runs across this site from the east to the northwest boundary; there are several other smaller waterways that run across and along the boundaries of Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 3 ID1.111130W.1 the site. 2. Hazards: Staff is not aware of any hazards that exist on this site. 3. Flood Plain: This property does not lie within the floodplain or flood way. VII. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/ANALYSIS Future Land use Map (FLUM): The FLUM contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP) currently designates 63.3+/- acres of the subject property as Lifestyle Center (LC); 20.3+/- acres as High Density Residential (HDR); 5.1+/- acres as Medium High Density Residential (MHDR); and 30.4+/- acres as Medium Density Residential (MDR). See ExhibitA.4. LC: The LC designation is a specific form of mixed use commercial. The purpose of the LC is to encourage a diversity of compatible land uses in a unified development that includes a mix of retail, professional services, offices, entertainment uses, civic services, housing and public outdoor spaces. The design and arrangement of buildings should be oriented to pedestrians. Streetscape improvements should be provided that create rich and enjoyable public spaces. HDR: HDR areas are multiple -family housing areas where relatively larger and taller apartment buildings are the recommended building type. HDR areas should include a mix of housing types that achieve an overall average density target of at least 16-25 dwelling units per gross acre with up to 50 units per acre in a multi -story project. The design and orientation of new HDR buildings should be pedestrian -oriented and special streetscape improvements should be considered to create rich and enjoyable public spaces. A strong physical relationship between the commercial and residential components to adjacent employment or transit centers is critical. MHDR: Areas designated MHDR are recommended primarily for relatively dense multi -family housing types, such as row houses, townhouses, condominiums and apartment buildings and complexes. MHDR areas should include a mix of housing types that achieve an overall average density of 12 dwelling units per gross acre. Generally, densities should range from 8-15 units per acre. MDR: MDR areas are characterized by relatively low densities and a predominance of single-family and two -unit housing types emphasizing ownership opportunities. Smaller two, three, or four unit apartment buildings may be compatible in an MDR area, but large apartment buildings or apartment complexes are not. In general, MDR areas should be protected from encroachments of higher density or higher intensity uses. MDR areas should include a mix of housing types that achieve an overall average target gross density of 6 units per acre. Generally, densities should range from 4-8 units per acre and should be designed conducive to walking with all of the housing and other uses sharing an interconnected sidewalk and street system. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & ACTION ITEMS: Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application and apply to the proposed use of this property (staff analysis in italics): • "Support a variety of residential categories (low-, medium-, medium-high and high-density single- family, multi -family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities." (3.07.01E) A variety of residential uses are anticipated to be developed on this site in the proposed R-8, TN- R, TN -C and C -G zones which should provide the City with a range of housing opportunities in this area. Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 4 1*.4:1130W1 • "Implement the City's Pathways Master Plan to provide a bike and pathways system between neighborhoods, local collectors, and community destinations." (6.02.01A) The Master Pathways Plan depicts two segments of the City's multi -use pathway system east/west across this site and to the north. These pathways will provide pedestrian and bicycle connectivity to and through this development. • "Provide housing options close to employment and shopping centers." (3.07.02D) The proposed residential component of this development will provide housing options close the employment areas and shopping centers on this site as well as adjacent developments. • "Require landscape street buffers for new development along all entryway corridors." (2.01.02E) With development of the site, a 35 foot wide landscaped street buffer is required along S. Ten Mile Road, an entryway corridor, in accord with UDC Table 11-2B-3. • "Plan for a variety of commercial and retail opportunities within the Area of City Impact." (3.05.01J) The proposed development should provide a variety of commercial and retail opportunities that don't currently exist in this area of the City. • "Permit new development only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City." (3.01.0IF) This property is contiguous to land that has already been annexed into the City. Urban services can be provided to this property upon development. City water and sewer service and reclaimed water are available in Ten Mile Road. TRANSPORTATION: The transportation system map contained in the TMISAP (pg. 3-18) depicts collector streets across this site connecting to a street network to the north and south; round -a -bouts are also depicted on the map at the north and south boundaries of the site (see Exhibit A.3). A local street is also depicted on the map at the east end of the site to the south boundary connecting to S. Lilac Street. The conceptual street layout plan proposed by the applicant depicts collector streets, round -a -bouts, and a local street to the south consistent with the transportation system map contained in the TMISAP (see Exhibit A.2). Each of the round -a -bouts will be centered on the shared property line with the properties to the north and south of the site. The TMISAP includes several collector street types (sections) for specific uses and conditions based on projected vehicular and pedestrian usage, desired parking conditions, specific physical conditions, public emergency access, and streetscape character. Streets within the Ten Mile area should be designed and sized to optimize pedestrian comfort and to facilitate slow-moving traffic. The Street Section Map contained in the TMISAP (pg. 3-22) depicts specific street sections for each of the collector streets shown on the transportation system map (see Exhibit A.3). Based on the Street Section Map, the north/south and east/west collector streets designated as "E" should be constructed as minor collector streets in accord with Street Section E in the Plan shown below (pg. 3- 21). The north/south section will extend to the north to a future signalized intersection at W. Franklin Road. (Note: The diagonal on -street parking shown in Street Section E may be parallel as planned on the TM Creek project to the north.) Ten We Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 5 Street So0110 ID1.111130W.1 The easttwest collector street (Ten Mile Creek Drive) designated as "D" at the northwest boundary of the site from Ten Mile Road to the round -a -bout is designated as a residential collector street but is currently proposed with the TM Creek project to be constructed as a major collector street in accord with Street Section C shown below (pg. 3-20). (Note: This cross section may be modified to include a center median as proposed on the TM Creek project to the north.) Street Secttoo C Sires .: Mess. -IMI The easttwest collector street designated as `B" at the southwest boundary of the site from Ten Mile Road to the round -a -bout is designated as a typical 4 -lane parkway to be constructed in accord with Street Section B shown below (pg. 3-20). The north/south collector street designated as "D" at the east end of the site is designated as a residential collector street to be constructed in accord with Street Section D below (pg. 3-21). Ten We Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 6 Street Seetion ❑ ID1.1111t3Y1I:1 The future street buffer along S. Ten Mile Road should be consistent with Street Section A as shown below (pg. 3-20). Staff finds the general layout of collector streets within the site is consistent with the Transportation System Map in the TMISAP. To ensure streets are constructed in accord with the Plan, staff recommends as a provision of annexation that the future collector streets constructed within the site are consistent with the above street sections as noted. DESIGN: The location, scale, form, height, and design quality of public and private buildings and spaces are integral to the development of the Ten Mile area. The design elements included in Chapter 3 of the TMISAP are intended to serve as the basic framework for projects within this area. The applicant has not proposed a conceptual site plan (other than street layout), building elevations or architectural details pertaining to the design of the future development on this site. However, the applicant is proposing a development agreement (DA) that includes some design elements contained in the TMISAP (see provisions #4.1.4 and #4.1.5 in Exhibit A.6). In addition to those provisions proposed by the applicant, staff recommends additional provisions in accord with the design elements contained in the Plan (per the matrix on page 3-49 of the TMISAP) consistent with the applicable land use designations (see Exhibit A.6). Ten We Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 7 ID1.111130W.1 VIII. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE A. Purpose Statement of Zones: 1. The purpose of the commercial districts is to provide for the retail and service needs of the community in accordance with the Meridian comprehensive plan. Six (6) districts are designated which differ in the size and scale of commercial structures accommodated in the district, the scale and mix of allowed commercial uses, and the location of the district in proximity to streets and highways (UDC 11-2B-1). The largest scale and broadest mix of retail, office, service, and light industrial uses are allowed in the C -G district and are located in close proximity and/or with access to interstate or arterial intersections. 2. The purpose of the traditional neighborhood districts is to encourage mixed use, compact development that is sensitive to the environmental characteristics of the land and facilitates the efficient use of services. Vertically integrated residential projects are encouraged in all traditional neighborhood districts. A traditional neighborhood district diversifies and integrates land uses within close proximity of each other, and it provides for the daily recreational and shopping needs of the residents (UDC 11-213-1). The purpose of the TN -C district is to serve as the focal point of a neighborhood center, containing retail, commercial, and community services to meet the daily needs of community residents within a one or two mile radius. The TN -C district is pedestrian oriented and is designed to encourage pedestrian connection with a traditional neighborhood residential district. TN -C district uses include small scale retail, restaurants, recreational, personal services, public or quasi -public uses, churches, and attached and multi -family dwellings. The purpose of the TN -R district is to provide for a variety of residential land uses including attached and detached and single-family residential, duplex, townhouse, and multi -family. A TN -R district includes open spaces and promotes pedestrian activity through well designed and varied streetscapes that also provide for the safe and efficient movements of vehicular traffic. Most dwelling should be accessed from alleys. The maximum density is 15 dwelling units (d.u.) per acre with a minimum density of 8 d.u. per acre. Density should decrease away from the center and closer to conventional residential districts. The TN -R district should be generally located adjacent to a TN -C district, along a transit corridor, or within a mixed use neighborhood. 3. The purpose of the residential districts is to provide for a range of housing opportunities consistent with the Meridian comprehensive plan. Residential districts are distinguished by the allowable density of dwelling units per acre and corresponding housing types that can be accommodated within the density range. The medium -density residential (R-8) district allows a maximum gross density of 8 dwelling units per acre (UDC 11-2A-1). B. Schedule of Use: UDC Tables 11 -2A -2,11-2B-2, and 11-213-2 list the principal permitted (P), accessory (A), conditional (C), and prohibited (-) uses in the proposed R-8, C -G, TN -R, and TN -C zoning districts respectively. Any use not explicitly listed is prohibited. C. Dimensional Standards: Development of the site should be consistent with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Tables 11 -2A -6,11-2B-3, 11-213-5 and 11-2D-6 for the R-8, C -G, TN -C and TN -R zoning districts respectively. D. Landscaping: Landscaping is required in accordance with the TMISAP along streets. Landscaping within parking lots is required to comply with UDC 11 -3B -8C. E. Off -Street Parking: Off-street parking is required in accord with UDC 11 -3C -6B for non-residential Ten We Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 8 1*.1:1130W.1 uses and UDC Table 11-3C-6 for residential uses. IX. ANALYSIS A. Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation: Zoning: The applicant proposed to annex and zone 120.69 acres of land as follows: • 81.35 acres located in the LC (63 acres), HDR (15+/- acres), and MHDR (1.5+/- acres) designated areas to C -G (general retail and service commercial); • 14.5+/- acres located in the HDR (5.5+/- acres) and MHDR (3.8+/- acres) designated areas to TN -C (traditional neighborhood center); • 11.5+/- acres located in the MDR designated area to TN -R; and • 13.23 acres located in the MDR designated area to R-8 (medium density residential). Staff has reviewed the requested zoning designations for compatibility with the land use designations contained in the TMISAP and has the following comments: Almost half of this site is designated for residential uses on the FLUM. The applicant's proposed zoning designations of R-8, TN -R and TN -C all allow for a variety of residential uses; however, they also allow a variety of other non-residential uses through a conditional use permit. The applicant proposes to develop all of the R-8 and TN -R zoned area with residential uses. Additionally, the applicant commits through the DA to construct a minimum of 300 additional residential units in the C -G and TN -C zoned areas. Staff feels if the applicant provides residential uses as proposed that this area will develop with the residential densities that are proposed in the TMISAP. The legal descriptions submitted with the application (included in Exhibit C) show the boundaries of the property proposed to be annexed and zoned contiguous to the existing boundary of the City of Meridian. Conceptual Development Plan: The applicant has submitted a conceptual development plan that depicts a future street layout for the site; no building pads, parking, or future uses are shown on the plan. The configuration of the streets and roundabouts are generally consistent with the transportation plan contained in the TMISAP as discussed above in Section VII (see Exhibits A.2 and A.3). Conceptual building elevations were not submitted with this application. Future development of the site including structures should be consistent with the provisions of the UDC, the Meridian Design Manual, and the design elements contained in the TMISAP. Further details of these design elements are included in the proposed DA provision listed in exhibit A.6. Multi -use Pathway: The Pathways Master Plan indicates a multi -use pathway connecting Peregrine Elementary to Ten Mile Road along the Kennedy Lateral and leaving the lateral, continuing west to or near the future collector intersection at Ten Mile Road. A second pathway connection is indicated connecting the Kennedy Lateral pathway to the Ten Mile pathway to the north. (See ExhibitA.5) Staff recommends both multi -use pathways be required with this development as the elementary school boundaries extend west of Ten Mile Road and south of I-84. Should the Kennedy Lateral be tiled and relocated as part of the development, the multi -use pathway may follow the surface street layout as a 10' pathway on one side of the east -west road network. It is not critical that the pathway follow the waterway. Ten We Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 9 ID1.111130W.1 Hours of Operation: Business hours of operation in the C -G zoning district are limited from 6:00 am to 11 pm when the property abuts a residential use or district per UDC 11 -2B -3A.4, unless otherwise approved through a conditional use permit. Staff recommends approval of the subject AZ application with the requirement for a development agreement containing the provisions listed in Exhibit A.6. X. EXHHtITS A. Drawings/Other 1. Vicinity/Zoning Map 2. Conceptual Site Plan (dated: 12�9A 3 3. Transportation System Map & Street Section Map (TMISAP) 4. Future Land Use Map (PLUM) 5. Master Pathways Plan 6. Development Agreement Provisions Proposed by Applicant & Recommended by Staff B. Agency Comments/Conditions of Approval 1. Planning Division 2. Public Works Department 3. Fire Department 4. Police Department 5. Sanitary Service Company 6. Parks Department 7. Ada County Highway District C. Legal Description and Exhibit Map for Proposed Annexation (RF.ViSF.nl D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code Ten We Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 10 ID1.111130W.1 Exhibit A.1: Vicinity/Zoning Map Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE II ID1.111130W.1 Exhibit A.2: Conceptual Site Plan (dated: 42/W43 5L4g4) ■ ►�►��►►��p INUMEMEN ■■�► �� � 11/111111 plsa.fiiio 111 -■� �.■ ���IIIIIIIII���11111111=�==�=� - = IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII � e;,••.; Ten We Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 12 ID1.111130W.1 Exhibit A.3: Transportation System Map & Street Section Map (TMIS") o .w x .:a 0 s wr+.,..o... e I.... .....s T Street Section Map MUG amended. RawMion W -al on 11M5@ _—....� ............................... O, \ O O r 3 O O' ........� ....---------- ......-...... - .............. -.............. Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 13 ID1.111130W.1 Exhibit AA: Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 14 ID1.111130W.1 Exhibit A.5: Master Pathways Plan Ten We Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 15 I*4441113YW.1 Exhibit A.6: Development Agreement Provisions Proposed by Applicant & Recommended by Staff (Note: Staffs recommended changes to the provisions are noted in underline/strike-out format. Commission recommended changes noted in double underline/strikeout) This exhibit only contains the portion of the DA proposed by the applicant that contains the uses permitted by this agreement & the conditions governing development of the subject property. The full document is contained in the applicant's application. 3. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: 3.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed for the applicable zone under City's Zoning Ordinance, codified at UDC § 11-2A-2, § 11-2B-2 and § 11-213-2. 3.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. Except as otherwise prohibited in this Agreement, any uses added to the applicable zone by any future amendment of the UDC shall be allowed on the Property. 4. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 4.1 Owner/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: 4.1.1 The Property shall be subdivided prior to submittal of the first Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. 4.1.2 The Property shall be developed in a manner that provides a transition in uses to adjacent residential properties. 4.1.3 A multi -use pathway shall be provided on the Property consistent with the Master Pathways Plan. 4.1.4 A pedestrian connection shall be made to the adjacent school site. 4.1.5 The portion of the Property to be zoned C -G should develop with a mix of uses such as retail, professional services, offices, entertainment uses, civic services, housing and outdoor spaces in the common area of the project as anticipated for the Lifestyle Center desigaated area designation in the Ten Mile Interchange_ Specific Area Plan (TM1SAP)and shall be developed in a manner that incorporates design concepts from the Ten Mile htterehange Speeifte2kre P4an-(TMISAP) such as, but not limited to, the following: • low-rise buildings of 2-4 stories over much of the area, or other massing that meets the bulk and scale design concepts set forth in the TMISAP; • buildings built to the edge of the public rights of way or circulation roads except where additional sidewalk space is needed for cafe seating or for breaks in frontage for pocket parks; • large expanses of parking between the street and the front of the buildings are not desirable and should be minimized where practical; • smaller pad buildings should face the street with an entrance oriented toward the street; • buildings designed to "hold corners" rather than parking lots; • restaurants encouraged to have outdoor dining; Ten We Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 16 1 *.411113 0 WA • shops and stores encouraged to open their doors and street view windows and use clear glass that allows easy visual access inwards and outwards (mirrored or reflective glass is not permitted; low emissivity glass is allowed); • integration of plaza, pocket parks, pedestrian arcades and other common areas in site design; and • building location and design oriented toward and/or connected to common areas and/or public space. Specific design features may vary from those outlined in the TMISAP (e.g., floor area ratios, unbroken frontage percentages, etc.) as necessary to accommodate operational requirements of certain end users, while still allowing a functional relationship among parking, circulation, loading and public right-of-way. 4.1.6 The portions of the Property to be zoned TN -C and TN -R shall be developed in a manner that incorporates traditional neighborhood design concepts from the TMISAP such as, but not limited to, the following: • higher density buildings close to the street; • narrower streets to slow traffic; • parking lots behind or under buildings; • residences with porches or balconies facing the street; and • garages in accord with the design elements listed in the TMISAP (pg. 3-33). Specific design features may vary from those outlined in the TMISAP as necessary to accommodate operational requirements of certain end users, while still creating a pedestrian - oriented focus. 4.1.7 IH addition to the Onlv residential ftni#s uses shall be developed within the R-8 zone. In dditional to other allowed uses, a minimum of 9S, 75 residential units shall he develone within the and TN -R zones, and a minimum of 300 residential units shall be developed within the C -G and/or TN -C zones combined. 4.1.8 Business signs shall be compatible in color, materials, sizes, shapes and lighting with the architecture of the buildings and the businesses they identify and shall not be incompatible with surrounding buildings or development. All signs shall comply with the standards listed in the TMISAP (pg. 3-46). 4.1.9 Public art shall be incorporated into the development at the entry of the site to treats a sense of arrival and as appropriate throughout the site, in accord with the TMISAP. Public art should be integrated into either the architectural design or the design of plazas, common areas and public spaces and should be easily visible to the public in accord with the TMISAP (pg. 3-47). 4.1.10 The future street layout for the site shall substantially comply with the conceptual street layout shown in Exhibit A.2. Future construction of these streets shall be consistent with the applicable street section as shown on the Street Section Map contained in the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP) (pgs. 3-20 and 3-21) with the exception of the east/west collector street (Ten Mile Creek Drive) from Ten Mile Road at the northwest corner of the site which shall be constructed as a major collector street in accord with Street Section C. 4.1.11 Future development of the site shall be generally consistent with the design elements contained in the TMISAP (Chapter 3), the design standards in UDC 11-3A-19, and the guidelines in the Meridian Design Manual. Ten We Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 17 1*.411130WA 4.1.12 The Kennedy Lateral and all other waterways on the site shall be piped or otherwise covered in accord with UDC 11-3A-6, unless waived by City Council. 4.1.13 The agricultural use of the property may continue until such time as the property develops. The Right -to Farm Act, Idaho Code Section 22-4503 is applicable to the subject property. 4.1.14 Based on the 2010 Meridian Sewer Master Plan, the subject property lies within two sewer boundaries. The Kennedy Lateral is the sewer shed boundary. Sanitary sewer services to this development is are being proposed via main extensions from the Black Cat Trunk and Ten Mile Diversion Trunk Owner/Developer shall install mains to and through the development, coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet; if cover from top of pipe to sub -grade is less than three feet then alternative materials shall be used in conformance with City of Meridian Public Works Department standard specifications. 4.1.15 Water service to the subject property will be via extension of mains in Ten Mile Road along the alignment of the future east -west collector. Owner/Developer shall be responsible to install water mains to and through the property at the time of development and to coordinate main sizes and routing with City of Meridian Public Works Department. 4.1.16 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). The City of Meridian owns and operates a reclaimed water system along the South Ten Mile and West Franklin Road frontages of this parcel. Owner/Developer shall coordinate with the Public Works Department on the possible connection to this system for the provision of landscape irrigation water. 4.1.17 Business hours of operation in the C -G zoning district are limited from 6:00 am to 11:00 Pm when the property abuts a residential use or district, per UDC 11 -2B -3A.4. Extended hours may be requested through a conditional use permit. 4.1.18 Owner/Developer agrees to utilize the City of Meridian's Class "A" Reclaimed Water System as the primary water supply source for the required pressurized irrigation system when it is determined to be available by the Public Works Department and approved by Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. 4.1.19 prior to i%%nanee of the first hnold *ng permit on the cite aeee%% to the cite %hall he provided An Ten Mile Road - Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 18 ID1.111130W.1 Exhibit B: Agency Comments On February 6, 2014, Planning Staff held an agency comments meeting. The agencies and departments present include: Meridian Fire Department, Meridian Police Department, Park's Department and Meridian Public Works Department. Staff has included all comments and recommended actions in the attached Exhibit B. 1. PLANNING DIVISION 1.1 ANNEXATION & ZONING 1.1.1 A Development Agreement (DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to the annexation ordinance approval, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. The Applicant shall contact the City Attorney's Office to initiate this process. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the city within two (2) years of the City Council granting annexation. Currently, a fee of $303.00 shall be paid by the applicant to the City Clerk's office prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall incorporate the provisions proposed by the applicant and recommended by Staff in Exhibit A.6. 2. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2.1 Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub -grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2.2 Per Meridian City Code, the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. 2.3 The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20 -feet wide for a single utility, or 30 -feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXfIIBIT A) and an 81/2" x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. 2.4 The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2.5 All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 2.6 All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. Plans Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 19 ID1.111130W.1 shall be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written approval or non -approval submitted to the Public Works Department. If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, alternate plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Meridian City Engineer prior to final plat signature. 2.7 Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at (208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190. 2.8 Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 2.9 Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated, fencing installed, drainage lots constructed, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits. 2.10 A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 2.11 All development improvements, including but not limited to sewer and water, fencing, micro - paths, pressurized irrigation and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. 2.12 Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 2.13 It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 2.14 Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 2.15 Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 2.16 All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 2.17 Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 2.18 The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3 -feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1 -foot above. 2.19 The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 2.20 At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 20 1*.1:1130W.1 2.21 100 Watt and 250 Watt, high-pressure sodium street lights shall be required on all public roadways per the City of Meridian Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. Street lighting is required at intersections, corners, cul-de-sacs, and at a spacing that does not exceed that outlined in the Standards. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. 2.22 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 2.23 The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 3. FIRE DEPARTMENT 3.1 The Fire Department has no comments on this application. 4. POLICE DEPARTMENT 4.1 The Police Department has no comments on this application. 5. SANITARY SERVICES 5.1 SSC has no comments related to this application. 6. PARKS DEPARTMENT 6.1 The Pathways Master Plan indicates a multi -use pathway connecting Peregrine Elementary to Ten Mile Road along the Kennedy Lateral and leaving the lateral, continuing west to or near the future collector intersection at Ten Mile Road. A second pathway connection is indicated connecting the Kennedy Lateral pathway to the Ten Mile pathway to the north. Both multi -use pathways shall be required with this development as the elementary school boundaries extend west of Ten Mile Road and south of I-84. Should the Kennedy Lateral be tiled and relocated as part of the development, the multi -use pathway may follow the surface street layout as a 10' pathway on one side of the east -west road network. It is not critical that the pathway follow the waterway. 7. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT 7.1 Site Specific Conditions of Approval This application is for annexation and rezone only. The District may add additional findings for consideration when it reviews a specific development application. Site Specific Conditions will be will be established at that time. 7.2 Standard Conditions of Approval 7.2.1 All irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACHD right-of-way. 7.2.2 Private Utilities including sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within the ACHD right-of-way. Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 21 ID1.111130W.1 7.2.3 In accordance with District policy, 7203.3, the applicant may be required to update any existing noncompliant pedestrian improvements abutting the site to meet current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The applicant's engineer should provide documentation of ADA compliance to District Development Review staff for review. 7.2.4 Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 7.2.5 A license agreement and compliance with the District's Tree Planter policy is required for all landscaping proposed within ACHD right-of-way or easement areas. 7.2.6 All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 7.2.7 It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACRD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 7.2.8 Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 7.2.9 All design and construction shall be in accordance with the ACHD Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Standards unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 7.2.10 Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of ACHD prior to District approval for occupancy. 7.2.11 No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of ACRD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from ACHD. 7.2.12 If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACHD Planning Review will review the site plan and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that time. Any change in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with ACHD Policy and Standard Conditions of Approval in place at that time unless a waiver/variance of the requirements or other legal relief is granted by the ACHD Commission. Ten We Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 22 I *411113 0 W.1 C. Legal Description and Exhibit Map for Proposed Annexation lRF.ViSF.111 January 3, 2014 DESCRIPTION FOR PROPOSED MERIDIAN ANNEXATION TREASURE VALLEY CENTER 10 SIZE A parcel of land located in the NW 'b of Section 14, T. 3 N., R 1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the West % confer of said Section 14, from which the Center''/. comer of said section bears South 89°11'30" East, 2656.46 feet; Thence along the west boundary of the NW '/, of said Section 14 North 00'34' 17" East, 1336.30 feet to a point on the centerline of the Kennedy Lateral; Thence leaving said west boundary, and along said centerline: Thence South 89'59'13" East, 24.80 feet; Thence North 66°50'59" East, 203.10 feet to a point of curvature; Thence 92.42 feet along the are of a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 199.99 fat, a delta angle of 26°28'401, and a long chord bearing North 80°05'41" East, 91.60 feet to a point of tangency; Thence South 86°39'37" East, 156.20 feet to a point of curvature; Thence 107.70 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 199.99 fat, a delta angle of 30'5I' 16", and a long chord bearing North 77°54'23" East, 106.40 feet to a point of tangency; Thence North 62028'23" East, 91.30 fat to a point of curvature; Thence 68.91 feet along the are of a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 69.99 feet, a delta angle of 56' 10'12", and a long chord bearing South 8926'01 " East, 65.90 feet to a point of tangency; Thence South 61'20'19" East, 85.70 feet; Thence South 53°10'31" East, 198.60 feet; Thence South 50'57'55" East, 17.82 feet to a point on the north boundary of the S % of the NW '/. of said Section 14; Thence leaving said centerline, and along said north boundary South 89'10'21" East, 1700.41 feet to the NE coma of said S % of the NW %; Thence leaving said north boundary and along the north boundary of the SW % of the NE '/, of said Section 14 South 89'12'11" East, 1329.35 feet; Thence leaving said north boundary South 00'34'59" West, 1038.04 feet; Thence North 89'11'30" West, 450.00 feet; Thence South 00'35'31" West, 290.40 feet to a point on the south boundary of the SW '/a of the NE'/, of said Section 14; Thence along said south boundary North 89'11'30" West, 879.81 feet to thhe SE comer of the NW '/, (Center''/, corner) of said Section 14; Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 23 IMII131W.1 Thence along the south boundary of said NW I/. North 89°11'30" West, 2656.46 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 120.69 acres, more or less. This description was prepared from data of record (Record of Survey No. 8353, records of Ada County, Idaho) and does not represent a held survey of the subject property. 9' E E S IRVF TAR F CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD BRG CHORD C7 92.42 199.99 2628'40' N 80.0541' E 91.60 C2 107.70 199.99 3751'16° N 7754'23' E 106.40 C3 68.61 69.99 56'10'12' S W2001' E 65.90 S 9'10'21" E 170.41' _ S�'12'1�'� 1329.35 m� �t— ,106q. - w o a 1 VF BEl4HNING f` 89"1'SO' '4 2656.46' - �R01N I Z L _ tr LIJ Z � � 1 Q LU O omz C..) }U w -o Z L J 03 o J zea 0 Er z Wza W w 'F< o 0 LJJ Cf)C Q Cr- L1 Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 24 Y 1 M O o � z w Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 24 I *111113 0II:1 November 5, 2013 DESCRIPTION FOR PROPOSED C -G ZONE TREASURE VALLEY CENTER 10 A parcel of land located in the NW % of Section 14, T. 3 N., R l W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the West 'A corner of said Section 14, from which the Center'/. corner of said section bears South 89°11'30" East, 2656.46 feet; Thence along the west boundary of the NW % of said Section 14 North 00634'17" East, 1336.30 feet to a point on the centerline of the Kemiedy Lateral; Thence leaving said west boundary, and along said centerline: Thence South 89'59'13" East, 24.80 feet; Thence North 66°50'59" East, 203.10 feet to a point of curvature; Thence 92.42 feet along the are of a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 199.99 feet, a delta angle of 26°28'40", and a long chord beating North 80°05'41" East, 91.60 feet to a point of tangency; Thence South 86°39'37" East, 156.20 feet to a point of curvature; Thence 107.70 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 199.99 feet, a delta angle of 30'51'16", and a long chord bearing North 77054123" East, 106.40 feet to a point of tangency; Thence North 62°28'23" East, 91.30 feet to a point of curvature; Thence 68.91 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 69.99 feet, a delta angle of 56°10'12", and a long chord bearing South 89026'01" East, 65.90 feet to a point of tangency; Thence South 61°20'19" East, 85.70 feet; Thence South 53°10'31" East, 198.60 feet; Thence South 50°57'55" East, 17.82 feet to a point on the north boundary of the S 'h of the NW b of said Section 14; Thence leaving said centerline, and along said north boundary South 89°10'21" East, 1609.44 feet; Thence leaving said north boundary South 00049'39" West, 45.00 feet to a point of curvature; Thence 144.04 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 300.00 feet, a delta angle of 27'30'31", and a long chord bearing South 12055'37" East, 142.66 feet to a point of reverse curvature; Thence 239.89 feet along tire arc of a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 500.00 feet, a delta angle of 27°29'22", and a long chord beating South 12°56' 11" East, 237.60 feet to a point of tangency; Thence South 00°48'30" West, 207.08 feet to a point of curvature; Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 25 IMII1131W.1 Thence 361.37 feet along the are of a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 500.00 feet, a delta angle of 41°24'34", and a long chord bearing South 21030'47" West, 353.55 feet to a point of compound curvature; Thence 57.88 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 300.00 feet, a delta angle of 11°03' 13", and a long chord bearing South 47°44'41" West, 57.79 feet; Thence leaving said curve South 36°43'42" East, 53.27 feet to a point of curvature; Thence 131.03 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 200.00 feet, a delta angle of 3732'12", and a long chord bearing South 17°57'36" East, 128.70 feet to a point oftangency; Thence South 00°48'30" West, 172.47 feet to a point on the south boundary of the NW % of said Section 14; Thence along said south boundary North 89°11'30" West, 2557.72 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 81.35 acres, more or less. This description was prepared from data of record (Reoord of Survey No. 8353, records of Ada County, Idaho) and does not represent a field survey of the subject property. N Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 26 I *111113 0II:1 June 6, 2014 DESCRIPTION FOR PROPOSED R-8 ZONE TREASURE VALLEY CENTER 10 A parcel of land located in the SW '/. of the NE '/ and the SE'/, of the NW '/+ of Section 14, T. 3 N., R 1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the Center Y. comer of said Section 14, from which the West 'A comer of said section bears North WI 1'30" West, 2656.46 feet; Thence along the south boundary of the SE 'A of the NW '/. of said Section 14 North 89° I Vw West, 98.74 feet; Thence leaving said south boundary North 00°48'30" East, 172.47 feet to a point of curvature; Thence 131.03 feel along the arc of a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 200.00 feet, a delta angle of 37"32' 12", and a long chord bearing North 17057'36' West, 128.70 feet to a point of tangency; Thence North 36°43'42^ West, 53.27 feet; Thence South 89°11'30^ East, 946.13 feet; Thence North 00°34'59" East, 991,76 feet to a point on the north boundary of the SW 'A of the NE'/. of said Section 14; Thence along said north boundary South 8901211" East, 555.00 feet to the NE corner of said SW '/ of the NE 1/4; Thence along the east boundary of said SW '/. of the NE ti South 00°34'59" West, 1038.04 feet; Thence leaving said east boundary North 89° 11'30" West, 450.00 feet; Thence South 00°35'31 ^ West, 290.40 feet to a point on the south boundary of the SW '/. of the NE '/. of said Section 14; Thence along said south boundary North 89011'30" West, 879.81 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING- Containing 20.76 acres, more or less. This description was prepared from data of record (Record of Survey No. 8353, records of Ada County, Idaho) and does not represent a field survey of the subject property. 130528-R-8.rcv.dmx Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 27 I D1.111113 Y W.1 June 4, 2014 DESCRIPTION FOR PROPOSED TN -C ZONE TREASURE VALLEY CENTER 10 A parcel of land located in the SE 'b of the NW '/ and the SW Y. of the NE 'A of Section 14, T. 3 N., R 1 W„ B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Center N comer of said Section 14, from which the West '!/ comer of said section bears North 89011'30" West, 2656.46 feel, thence along the south boundary of the SE 'A of the NW V of said Section 14 North 89°11'30" West, 98.74 feet; thence leaving said south boundary North 00048'30" East, 172.47 feet to a point of curvature; thence 131.03 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 200.00 feet, a delta angle of 37°32' 12", and a long chord bearing North 17057'36" West, 128.70 feet to a point of tangency; thence North 36043'42" West, 53.27 feet to a point on a curve, being the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence 57.88 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 300.00 feet, a delta angle of 11 003'l 3", and a long chord bearing North 47°44'41" East, 57.79 feet to a point of compound curvature; Thence 361.37 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 500.00 feet, a delta angle of 41 °24'34", and a long chord bearing North 21 °30'47" East, 353.55 feet to a point of tangency; Thence North 00°48'30" East, 207.08 feet to a point of curvature; Thence 239.89 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 500.00 feet, a delta angle of 27°29'22", and a long chord bearing North 12056'11" West, 237.60 feet to a point of reverse curvature; Thence 144.04 feet along the are of a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 300.00 feet, a delta angle of 27°30'31", and a long chord bearing North 12°55'37" West, 142.66 feet to a point oftangency; Thence North 00049'39" East, 45.00 feet to a point on the north boundary of the SE 1/4 of the NW % of said Section 14; Thence along said north boundary South 89°10'21" East, 90.97 feet to the NE comer of said SE 'A of the NW 1l4; Thence along the north boundary of the SW !4 of the NE 'A of said Section 14 South 89-12'11" East, 414.33 feet; Thence leaving said north boundary South 00°48'30" West, 991.68 feet, Thence North 89°11'30" West, 582.22 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 10.32 acres, more or less. This description was prepared from data of record (Record of Survey No. 8353, records of Ada County, Idaho) and does not represent a field survey of the subject property. 130528-TN-C.m .docs Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 28 I D1.111113 Y II:1 June 4, 2014 DESCRIPTION FOR PROPOSED TN -R ZONE TREASURE VALLEY CENTER 10 A parcel of land located in the SW '/, of the NE'/. of Section 14, T. 3 N., R 1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows, Commencing at the Center'/, comer of said Section 14, from which the West 'b comer of said section bears North 89'11'30" West, 2656.46 feet; thence along the south boundary of the SE '/, of the NW Y. of said Section 14 North 89011'30" West, 98.74; thence leaving said south boundary North 00048'30" East, 172.47 feet to a point of curvature; thence 131.03 feet along the are of a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 200.00 feet, a delta angle of 37032'12", and a long chord bearing North 17'57'12" West, 128.70 feet to a point of tangency; thence North 36043'42" West, 53.27 feet; thence South 89°11'30" East, 582.22 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence North 00148'30" East, 991.68 feet to a point on the north boundary of the SW % of the NE Y, of said Section 14; Thence along said north boundary South 89'12'11" East, 360.01 feet; Thence leaving said north boundary South 00°34'59" West, 991.76 feet; Thence North 89°11'30" West, 363.91 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 8.24 acres, more or less. This description was prepared from data of record (Record of Survey No. 8353, records of Ada County, Idaho) and does not represent a field survey of the subject property. 130528-TN-R.rev.dom Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 29 N 6728'23' E X59• E 91.30' S 6"20'19' E 85.70' C2 5 53'1071' E 5 8639'37' E 198.60' E 156.20' 5 50'57'55' E 1 1*44,1130W.1 5 0049'39' W II CURVE TABLE ca - S CURVE CI LENGTH 92.42 RADIOS 199.99 DELTA CHORD BBO CHORD 2628'40" N 8005'41' E 91.60 Z DIY $ C2 C3 107.70 68.61 199.99 69,99 3051'16' N 7754'23' E 106.40 56 10'12' 5 W26'01' E 55.90 c fta 0 - e G 8 C4 1".04 700.00 273071' S 1755'37- E 142.66 - y C5 239.89 500.00 2729'22' N 1756'11' W 237.60 l.Liti W 10 ^ g C6 351.37 500.00 41'2434' N 21'3047- E .313.55 2 R-8 �' C7 57.88 300.00 n'OY13' N 47"'41' E 57.79 ` Q o C8 131.03 20000 3732'12' W 128.70 V i "STV, J W� 5 0049'39' W II QR�e�S�o al' DIY z F �\. POINT OF BEGINNING TN -G -4A I W43'42' E�5 011 5 5357' 4 5 004870' W r 17� � � _— 2557 72' I7T.1T„ 10 ^ M8711'30'IY 2656.46' POINT OF BEGINNING C G BASIS OF BEARING POINT OF BEGINNING, I I R-8 b�oyJL z o OF ON ED ED W. Lu p S x'12'11' E Z 90.97 414..M_ 760x1^ SSS.bO L.L.I Z Ir U Om� L) U ZI a ZLu U -� �o LLI 3 0W 3 oe 3r a o' V) RI twr7 K W gr o a r BI Ets.lr o owC �I � $I � i a a� rE a Q _ 582.22' 3sa91' O w N 69'1170 W 946.13 5 lel E cr cr PpNi Oi_ 4150.001 0- Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 30 IMII131W.1 D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code 1. ANNEXATION & ZONING FINDINGS: Upon recommendation from the Commission, the Council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone, the Council shall make the following findings: a. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; The City Council finds that the proposed map amendment is generally consistent with the LC, HDR, MMR, and MDR FLUM designations for this site with the development agreement provisions proposed by the applicant and those recommended by staff in Exhibit AA Further, the amendment should be compatible with existing and future adjacent uses. Therefore, the City Council finds the amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan (see section VII above for more information). b. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds that the proposed map amendment to the C -G, TN -R, TN -C and R-8 zoning districts is consistent with the purpose statements of the applicable districts as detailed in Section VIII above. c. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. City utilities will be extended at the expense of the applicant. d. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City including, but not limited to, school districts; and, The City Council finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not result in any adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site. e. The annexation is in the best of interest of the City (UDC 11 -5E -3.E). The City Council finds the proposed annexation of this site is in the best interest of the City based on the analysis contained in the staff report. Ten Mile Center AZ -14-001 PAGE 31 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 17, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: 5C PROJECT NUMBER: FP 14-021 ITEM TITLE: Paramount Subdivision No. 27 C. Final Order for Approval: FP 14-021 Paramount Subdivision No. 27 by Brighton Investments, LLC Located Southwest Corner of N. Meridian Road and W. Chinden Boulevard Request: Forty (40) Building Lots and Two (2) Common/Other Lots on 11.36 Acres of Land in the R-8 Zoning District MEETING NOTES �'kbf y 7=i s IYD �r hO CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT CONSISTING OF 40 BUILDING LOTS AND 2 COMMON LOTS ON 11.36 ACRES OF LAND IN AN R-8 ZONING DISTRICT FOR PARAMOUNT SUBDIVISION NO. 27 BY: BRIGHTON INVESTMENTS, LLC APPLICANT HEARING DATE: JUNE 3, 2014 .NRYD►[1A-2' r, 11041 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council on June 3, 2014 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning Department and Public Works Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: I_EYI IWITO 19"411) R17 DI17 Yl 11 Y 1 /_V Y! 1. The Final Plat of "PLAT SHOWING PARAMOUNT SUBDIVISION NO. 27, LOCATED IN THE NE 3/4 OF SECTION 25, TAN., R.1 W., B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2014, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 4/30/14, JAMES R. WASHBURN, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 3," is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR PARAMOUNT SUBDIVISION NO. 27 (FP -14-021) Page 1 of 3 from the Planning Division and the Development Services division of the Community Development Department dated June 3, 2014, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked "Exhibit A" and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Michael Wardle, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked "Exhibit B" and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR PARAMOUNT SUBDIVISION NO. 27 (FP -14-021) Page 2 of 3 Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the /7W'\- day of c J f,Lc .A_ 2014. By: �m Tammy de e d KY , nre°nUCLs7'Mayor, City Meridian Attest: A �� 1 1onxo 5 aycee olman SR City Clerk sx°��np rne�soA``� Copy seryed upon the Applicant, Community Development Department, and City Attorney. Dated: `vrle- 1 I , aOl � ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR PARAMOUNT SUBDIVISION NO. 27 (FP -14-021) Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: June 3, 2014 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Sonya Watters, Associate City Planner 208-884-5533 ( `WE IDIAN� 2014 ipAHO Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: FP -14-021 —Paramount Subdivision No. 27 I. APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant, Brighton Investments, LLC, has applied for final plat approval of 40 single-family residential building lots and 2 common/other lots on 11.36 acres of land for Paramount Subdivision No. 27. The zoning district for the proposed subdivision is R-8 (Medium -Density Residential). H. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Paramount Subdivision No. 27 final plat subject to the conditions noted below. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the City Council. III. PROPOSED MOTION Approval I move to approve File Nmnber FP -14-021 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of June 3, 2014, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Denial I move to deny File Number FP -14-021, as presented during the hearing on June 3, 2014, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial.) Continuance I move to continue File Number FP -14-021 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location: The subject property is generally located off the southwest corner of N. Meridian Road and W. Chinden Blvd., in the NE'/ of Section 25, T. 4N., R. 1W. Parcel No.'s 50425141800 and 50425 1 1 0500 B. Applicant: Brighton Investments, LLC 12601 W. Explorer Dr., 4200 Boise, Idaho 83713 C. Owner: Same as applicant Paramount Sub No. 27 FP -14-02t PAGE 1 EXHIBIT A D. Representative: Mike Wardle, Brighton Corporation 12601 W. Explorer, #200 Boise, Idaho 83713 V. HISTORY In 2013, this property was annexed and zoned (AZ -13-005) and a preliminary plat (PP -13-008) was approved for Paramount Northeast subdivision. This subdivision was allowed to integrate into the overall final plat phasing of Paramount Subdivision at the determination of the Planning Director. This is the second phase of development of Paramount Northeast subdivision and is the 27`" phase of the overall Paramount subdivision. The first phase of development of Paramount Northeast subdivision was platted as Paramount Subdivision No. 24 (FP -14-005). VI. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed final plat depicts 40 building lots and 2 common lots on 11.36 acres of land. The gross density of the proposed subdivision is 3.52 dwelling units (d.u.) per acre with a net density of 4.62 d.u. per acre. The average lot size 9,419 square feet (s.f). There are no amenities proposed with this phase of development. All of the proposed lots are for single-family detached homes and comply with the dimensional standards for the R-8 zoning district. Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for consistency with the approved preliminary plat and found there to be an increase of one building lot in Block 64 on the proposed final plat. Because the number of buildable lots decreased by 4 lots in the previous phase and the amount of common open space is the same, staff finds the proposed plat to be in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required by UDCl1-6B-3C.2. VII. SITE SPECIFIC 1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved annexation and preliminary plat (AZ -13-005; PP - 13 -008; MDA -13-010) applications for this subdivision. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat within two years of the City Engineer's signature on a previous final plat, in accord with UDC 11-613-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by The Land Group, stamped on April 30, 2014 by James R. Washburn shall be revised as follows: a. Note #13: Include the recorded instrument number 5. The landscape plan prepared by The Land Group, dated May 2, 2014 is approved as submitted. 6. All fencing installed on the site must be in compliance with UDC 11-3A-6 and 11-3A-7. If permanent fencing does not exist at the subdivision boundary, temporary construction fencing to contain debris shall be installed around this phase prior to release of building permits for this subdivision. 7. Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. Paramount Sub No. 27 FP -14-021 PAGE 2 EXHIBIT A 8. Prior to the issuance of any new building permit, the property shall be subdivided in accordance with the UDC. VII. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub -grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated, fencing installed, drainage lots constructed, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District (ACED) and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-313-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887- 2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. All development improvements, including but not limited to sewer, water, fencing, and pressurized irrigation and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy, or as otherwise allowed by UDC 11-5C-1. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. Paramount Sub No. 27 FP -14-021 PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-314. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3 -feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1 -foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACED. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. 100 Watt and 250 Watt, high-pressure sodium street lights shall be required on all public roadways per the City of Meridian Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. Street lighting is required at intersections, corners, cul-de-sacs, and at a spacing that does not exceed that outlined in the Standards. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20 -feet wide for a single utility, or 30 -feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2" x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at (208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single -point Paramount Sub No. 27 FP -14-021 PAGE 4 EXHIBIT A connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. VIII. EXHIBITS A. Vicinity Map B. Approved Preliminary Plat (dated: 4/23/13) C. Proposed Final Plat (dated: 4/30/14) D. Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 5/2/14) Paramount Sub No. 27 FP -14-021 PAGE 5 EXHIBIT A Exhibit A — Vicinity Map 0 Vicinity Map r\ /i—!% THE LAND GROUP = �'% i � INFW 9a•PF•,IUNIW . fM1W aN9RWlfaaa.0.N�.M1� Paramount Subdivision 27 a ry1�Madtllan 1400�Exhibit Vicinity Map mrWx.: . ^* Potlati 1 Paramount Sub No. 27 FP -14-021 PAGE 6 EXHIBIT A Exhibit B — Approved Preliminary Plat (dated: 4/23/13) MM . 4 ® I � . I i h �_V tlA. � OwVI��eM1�NA O'YPYf61 i MRS u L }` Jr a PRELIMINARY PIAT Paramount Sub No. 27 FP -14-021 PAGE 7 EXHIBIT A Exhibit C — Proposed Final Plat (dated: 4/30/14) e � BHawB,AmI a# Nfs e e11�NIM1 EN ° use aH�x�waaw, • W.cgw{rvpVV, MOMYAV AaeI_ S.2d • ��PY.BA.W X.Xe PA. — � amsr°wwru•c _� Nabs: -------- =Z Q — Final Plat Paramount Subdivision No. 27 Lacaled In the NE 1/4 of SectIon 25, TAN., R.1 W., B.M., Meridian, Ada County, Idaho 2014 I. O aaa ee I`a O I� gfk W. Ksiwl pV. 9 M p a a t��AIMA1 ,nm'O tt �•.A• O une I a# geo S THE LAM GROUP i AY q �m mo • W.cgw{rvpVV, MOMYAV AaeI_ S.2d M9 6We: 1'=IYO 525 S.'A Nabs: cefpevm vaMw@�m1W°rtaiw(r�wp�Mi[e wm�ie Rr,nwP.cm�a,Poaa �� muw �mkw E ��p�!o 4�a1 v1F5•ow6dse tll �wWm kwnD,H i[ravaMl �NAe�m�•ww¢ u XPEnr IEo wwr a eEwaas � ronnlml�,H.�BBW �.HwI�P rwwnn.o-w, un.u, ' nt tuffi� _ nbxv ma.'w'u F�wvn'oau•°a"'�"i°•mum SHL m��urm 10 1 nm 8 �_ I�� smEYlt1 _ 0 uer d ] bwE'.",`Y::gbWOM woI"N,H.YaYOYmu, Wf uY Y..H -w.w,wm um.,mu.va, �K__ � 61CH OHR ar 6 t, © F Y yyF IW 1 ro I > .=,nrr , iF MS O 'a 15 'Y I • w"maN°:°wh.n�a..�v�m o-.A<•m.,,,a��ro,l�ia...m" ro HnBwirHPaw P ItoNm., uiui`r•PI Yi YIn A W Hq 2aH9�[B ,H`wnm °MAHP'Yn6 �4�nuAB wffitlm,O,Ifrv•""�'R Ym "N"Aa nv xpfePM W.®,MaS • 1 Winn c,RrR YOY�uWH(W,¢0 At PNm�* aW S�naM BIS CAdYH muY M�BBuulumn p NM Y �aa y" j•Q S IN IrF I��W]NiH H%p VNPIAIIEO QfCt� SY Il� I WPa"wH.n�A:Hnn.,m�Wn"rrt ®atlPp�T•'rlwa IBaH CI rteu"� vrtutiB umHal•marngnw •msw fL HW mP•cnluW �WWA.IBWL]Ifx Wrtm p91�H"iM mYtwAA'BJ`n°M�ILI'INgYiIWIW O une I geo S THE LAM GROUP 6bll� • H XYM 91611P] Paramount Sub No. 27 FP -14-021 PAGE 8 EXHIBIT A Exhibit D. — Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 5/2/14) fan - iP: r 1�1 o iiiw,Oyj Nil �IIII� iii ,� I , �f!►i�psj �"Al i+ a 0 t ��o u Paramount Sub No. 27 FP -14-021 PAGE 9 EXHIBIT B Sonya Watters From: Mike Wardle <MWardle@brightoncorp.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 5:11 PM To: Jaycee Holman; Jacy Jones; Machelle Hill Cc: Sonya Watters; David Turnbull; Blake Alder, Amanda McCurry Subject: RE: Paramount Sub No. 27 FP-14-021.doc All, We have reviewed the staff report for Paramount Subdivision No. 27 and concur with the recommendation for City Council approval with the proposed Site Specific Conditions; and request that the matter be placed on the consent agenda, f will attend the meeting to answer Council questions, if any.. Michael Wardle Director of Plantut g Brighton Corporation 12601 W. Exploxor, Suite 200 1 Boise, Idaho 83713 Direct 208.287.0512 1 Cell 208.863.6150 From: Sonya Watters lmallto:swattersCalmerldiancity,oral Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 4:32 PM To: Holly Binkley; Jacy Jones; Jaycee Holman; Machelle Hill Cc: Mike Wardle; Justin Lucas; Bruce Freckleton Subject: Paramount Sub No. 27 FP-14-021.doc Attached is the staff report for the proposed [application type] for [project name] [file #]. This item is scheduled to be on the [Commission/Council] agenda on [date]. The public hearing will be held at City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, beginning at 6:00 pm. Please call or e-mail with any questions. Mike - Please submit a written response to the staff report to the City Clerk's office (iholman@meridiancitv.org, mhitt@meridiancity.org, iiones@meridiancitv.orp) and myself (e-mail or fax) by 3:00 pm the Thursday prior to the hearing. If you are in agreement with the conditions of approval contained in the staff report and you submit a written response accordingly by Thursday at 3;00 pm, your item will be placed on the consent agenda; consent agenda items are passed in one motion by the Council at the beginning of the meeting. Note: if you are in agreement with the staff report, it is still recommended you attend the meeting in the event the item is pulled off of the consent agenda. If you do not respond to the staff report by Thursday, or if you have concerns with the conditions of approval, your project will be placed on the regular agenda. Thanks, Sonya Watters Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 17, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: FP 14-022 ITEM TITLE: Revolution Ridge D. Final Order for Approval: FP 14-022 Revolution Ridge Subdivision No. 1 by Conger Management Located 1 100 W. Riodosa Drive Request: Final Plat Approval Consisting of Forty -Five (45) Building Lots and Four (4) Common Lots on 14.24 Acres of Land in the R-4 Zoning District MEETING NOTES fi'L R� ry$ 1 r '{} 4_Ij Nli i5 N SS Y CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT CONSISTING OF 45 BUILDING LOTS AND 4 COMMON LOTS ON 14.24 ACRES OF LAND IN THE R-4 ZONING DISTRICT FOR REVOLUTION RIDGE SUBDIVISION NO. 1 BY: CONGER MANAGEMENT GROUP APPLICANT HEARING DATE: JUNE 3, 2014 CASE NO. FP -14-022 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council on June 3, 2014 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-613-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning Division and Development Services Division of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The Final Plat of "PLAT SHOWING REVOLUTION RIDGE SUBDIVISION NO. 1, LOCATED IN NORTHEAST'/4 OF THE NORTHWEST Y4 OF SECTION 25 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2014, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 5/1/14, RUSSELL E. BADGLEY, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR REVOLUTION RIDGE SUBDIVISION NO. 1 (FP -14-022) Page 1 of 3 PLS, SHEET 1 OF 5," is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning Division and the Development Services Division of the Community Development Department dated June 3, 2014, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked "Exhibit A" and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Diane Jossis, Conger Management Group, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked "Exhibit B" and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR REVOLUTION RIDGE SUBDIVISION NO. 1 (FP -14-022) Page 2 of 3 issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. ByI action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the /e 'A" day of -J U -AN A� 2014. Tammy de Klrd Mayor, Cit f Meridian )Ab -IN Attest: e 9 cry or Jayueeo an SEas- City Cler fq °� ?L, TRL01 Copy served upon the Applicant, Planning Department, Public Works Department, and City Attorney. By: Dated:_ w n 2 l 9 2O t N ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR REVOLUTION RIDGE SUBDIVISION NO. 1 (FP -14-022) Page 3 of 3 STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: June 3, 2014 C%WEIIDIAN�' TO: Mayor and City Council I [? P H Q FROM: Sonya Watters, Associate City Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: FP -14-022 —Revolution Ridge Subdivision No. 1 I. APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant, Conger Management Group, has applied for a final plat (FP) consisting of 45 building lots and 4 common lots on 14.24 acres of land in the R-4 zoning district for the first phase of Revolution Subdivision. H. STAFF RECOMMENDATION/DECISION Staff recommends approval of the Revolution Subdivision No. 1 final plat subject to the conditions noted in Sections VI and VII below. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the City Council. III. PROPOSED MOTION Approval I move to approve File Number FP -14-022 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of June 3, 2014, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Denial I move to deny File Number FP -14-022, as presented during the hearing on June 3, 2014, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial.) Continuance I move to continue File Number FP -14-022 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location: The subject property is located at 1100 W. Riodosa Road, in the NW '/ of Section 25, T. 3N., R. 1 W. (Parcel Number: R48 82810600) B. Applicant: Conger Management Group 1627 S. Orchard Street, Ste. 24 Boise, ID 83705 Revolution Ridge Subdivision No. 1 FP -14-022 PAGE 1 EXHIBIT A C. Owners: C13, LLC 1627 S. Orchard Street, Ste. 24 Boise, ID 83705 D. Representative(s): Jim Conger, Conger Management Group 1627 S. Orchard Street, Ste. 24 Boise, ID 83705 V. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed final plat depicts 45 building lots and 4 common lots on 14.24 acres of land in the R-4 zoning district. Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat (PP -13-040). The final plat depicts 2 additional building lots in Block 2 than was approved with the preliminary plat; as long as the overall number of building lots does not exceed those approved with the preliminary plat, the final plats will be deemed in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required by UDC 11 -6B -3C.2. Therefore, the phase 2 should contain 2 fewer building lots than approved on the preliminary plat. The amount of open space shown on the proposed final plat is the same as shown on the approved preliminary plat. VI. SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the previously approved development applications for this site (AZ -14-002, Development Agreement Instrument #114036593) and preliminary plat (PP -13- 040). 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat within two years of City Council approval of the preliminary plat (by May 6, 2016), in accord with UDC 11-613-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. Prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer, the plat shown in Exhibit C shall be revised as follows: a. Note #1: Delete "If the lot lines are adjusted, the easement shall also be adjusted accordingly, provided no facilities have been installed within the easement." b. Note #8: Include the lot and block number(s) that contain the ACHD storm water drainage system. c. Add Note #9: Maintenance of any irrigation ditch or pipecrossing a lot is the responsibility of the lot owner, unless such responsibility is assumed by an irrigation/drainage entity. d. Add Note #10: The bottom elevation of building footings shall be set a minimum of 12 - inches above the established normal high groundwater elevation. 5. Prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer, the landscape plan prepared by LEI, dated 11/25/13, shall be revised as follows: a. Depict a 6 -foot tall open vision fence along the rear of Lots 13-15, Block 2 adjacent to the Sundall lateral that complies with the standards listed in UDC 11 -3A -6B. Revolution Ridge Subdivision No. 1 FP -14-022 PAGE 2 EXHIBIT A b. A 15 -foot wide common lot is required between Lots 11 and 12, Block 2 with a 5 -foot wide pathway landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11 -3B -12C. c. Depict bollards with a chain between them at the entrance to the emergency access driveway on Lot 4, Block 1 and a paved 5 -foot wide pathway around the bollards for pedestrian access. d. Where bark is proposed within required landscape areas, the area is required to be at least 70% covered with vegetation at maturity in accord with UDC 11 -3B -5N; additional landscaping is required. e. One tree per 35 lineal feet is required to be planted within the parkway area along W. Victory Road in addition to the landscaping required within the street buffer area. f. If a sidewalk isn't proposed to be constructed along the west side of S. Kentucky Way, remove the sidewalk from the plan. g. Depict a 6 -foot tall solid temporary fence across the right-of-way of Rebellion Street and include a note stating a sign will be installed on the fence that states the street will be extended in the fixture. h. Revise the plan consistent with the layout of the revised final plat. 6. Submit a detail of the 5 -foot wide detached sidewalk required to be constructed on the east side of S. Kentucky Way. Said sidewalk shall be constructed with the first phase of development. 7. The residential structures built within this subdivision shall be consistent with the conceptual elevations included in the development agreement. 8. The rear or sides of homes on lots that back up to W. Victory Road and S. Kentucky Way shall incorporate articulation through changes in materials, color, modulation, and architectural elements (horizontal and vertical) to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines. 9. Amenities shall be provided in this subdivision consistent with those approved with the preliminary plat. 10. All fencing installed on the site shall comply with UDC 11-3A-6 and 11-3A-7. If permanent fencing does not exist at the subdivision boundary, temporary construction fencing to contain debris shall be installed around this phase prior to release of building permits for this subdivision. 11. Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. 12. The terminus of the water main in the Riodosa cul-de-sac shall terminate with a fire hydrant between Lot 15 and the pathway connection. VII. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub -grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. Revolution Ridge Subdivision No. 1 FP -14-022 PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A 3. Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated, fencing installed, drainage lots constructed, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District (ACHD) and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11 -3B -14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities, pressurized irrigation, prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887- 2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. All development improvements, including but not limited to sewer, water, fencing, and pressurized irrigation and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy, or as otherwise allowed by UDC 11-5C-1. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the At -my Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-12-3H. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3 -feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1 -foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACED. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any strictures within the project. Revolution Ridge Subdivision No. 1 FP -14-022 PAGE 4 EXHIBIT A 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. 100 Watt and 250 Watt, high-pressure sodium street lights shall be required on all public roadways per the City of Meridian Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. Street lighting is required at intersections, corners, cul-de-sacs, and at a spacing that does not exceed that outlined in the Standards. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20 -feet wide for a single utility, or 30 -feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2" x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8 contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at (208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. V. EXHHBITS A. Vicinity/Zoning Map B. Approved Preliminary Plat (dated: 1/28/14) C. Proposed Final Plat (REVISED) D. Landscape Plan (dated: 11/25/13) Revolution Ridge Subdivision No. 1 FP -14-022 PAGE 5 EXHIBIT A Exhibit A — Vicinity/Zoning Map Revolution Ridge Subdivision No. 1 FP -14-022 PAGE 6 EXHIBIT A Exhibit B — Approved Preliminary Plat (dated: 1/28/14) om©mr� mmmm� REVOLUTION RIDGE SUBDIVISION A rexcei. or uxu.ua caurso w a aaxrtox oe sc i/a ae StClION E5. TIA. RIE., sm.= w 1P .. IRA MU .. LLHO zwa 1[wawamwrnemx Revolution Ridge Subdivision No. 1 FP -14-022 PAGE 7 EXHIBIT A Exhibit C —Proposed Final Plat (REVISED) FINAL PLAT SHOWING FOR REVOLUTION RIDGE NO. 1 SUBDIVISION A K-SUOUMSION OF A KRR04 OF LOT 3. MW 3 OF NEmW NOCE ESTAM SUOCIAMN LOCATED M TIE NORINFA4I I/4 OF TIE NGRNM£$f 1/4 OF SEC110N ]5 70Wi HIP 3 NORM. RANGE I WEST. B.M.. LEGEND sH[%-Imw AOA CWIMY IWO -2014- aI*» ...nou Eal.wumor-r...mm v v '� _ n. no a�'M wwaw°xvwurwsum.n tow.M'�''m. }r61MN04 N�eY.vxlr _♦`ry _ _ Mw1x .rrvnu .xi�un. tlrM �1 a 11 1 • . � I a nanJ wu �1 1� ] 1 • I = , k 1 v ..'w.w+cwu»uun un I _ I 4 II I ii- �u•1 NOiE4 "roman un: 1 1 �• ��uwnuavrtianriexx.no.°ra.�w.uxw�rn®rwrwnmmuao i ykyf a ff n n � u • '4 \� �O'Frrux I IaL� ��n..x...ndwmM ' .°ex, • rs dl xveW m.""`.c'1.'o'°°x.'.�7&.°'..'x.:'n.i°xo,7d.on'"'.�,�e. EWEN w'"^' .row aveRWigw . � I eLr,ax�_]°aer_I ] x I M ii u M � -' 3 �� •• � ��, .....x,..a.,...ix .w...mm...x�.nm....x.�..., _ eo Z rl as' 1 ♦ I • w�wrPw.'fei"'M°'e"S'"M�.'$ro.w i M]C ] Vii ' inset r'I • ( 1 � - _ ) �♦ + 1 xerlr'>w - J. 1 , 1 em MUM rau °.r< xlralm ]Y roar � I] e INIVYIew l �. I-x1°'iYiW°. ]OLIl • Ix11 Il1JI �\ '• • xtl°rssr � k' ert IIx]Y e.e J xeevv.w .w� .,�- T 1 -11 7 -T I '° I re j '• j"� I' I I — P I `Se fy I I i EM INEEPS SUNVMRS J L �� P iNNf 15_ Revolution Ridge Subdivision No. 1 FP -14-022 PAGE 8 EXHIBIT A FINAL PLAT SHOWING FOR REVOLUTION RIDGE NO. 1 SUBDIVISION • 4-SL&'tl�a I Plx w I ], VIM ] a XMVAtt 9�LE [sFl6 wWu11 x ixaeo w ce axnrnn V• u me wmxxbr Vx a ssrnw zs mm.sxr s wmx wrc i rhsr. ae.. we mum. cwe -zm.- "" =LE Revolution Ridge Subdivision No. 1 FP -14-022 PAGE 9 1 ep Or 1 tl =LE Revolution Ridge Subdivision No. 1 FP -14-022 PAGE 9 EXHIBIT A Exhibit D: Landscape Plan (dated: 11/25/13) ' ,. zr s• FQSY.�li9TC i i 1, _.u. -._, MI "v.1WP ...tea . s tiCC�ti b + 6t" e ii M..F=I kl ' ,. zr s• FQSY.�li9TC i i 1, _.u. -._, MI "v.1WP e�A.Pe • er- I u� - Y ��A. Revolution Ridge Subdivision No. 1 FP -14-022 PAGE 10 EXHIBIT B Sonya Watters From: Dianne Jossis <djossis@congergroup.com> Sent: Monday, June 02, 201.4 2:24 PM To: Sonya Watters Cc: Laren Bailey; Jim Conger Subject: RE: Revolution Ridge Sub FP-14-022.doc Sonya, Jim Conger is in agreement with the staff report. Thankyou Dianne Jossis Conger Management Group 1627 S. Orchard Street, Ste 24 Boise, Idaho 83705 Office: 336-5355 Fax: 336-2282 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 17, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: 5E PROJECT NUMBER: FP 14-023 ITEM TITLE: Sagewood E. Final Order for Approval: FP 14-023 Sagewood Subdivision by Sagewood Overland, LLC Located South Side of W. Overland Road, Approximately 650 Feet West of S. Stoddard Road Request: Final Plat Approval Consisting of Two (2) Office Lots, Forty -Five (45) Residential Lots and Eight (8) Common Lots on Approximately 15.62 Acres of Land in the L -O and R-8 Zoning Districts MEETING NOTES f l S F A i N ifff W�P Nr StiV ti L4 M CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT CONSISTING OF 2 OFFICE LOTS, 45 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 8 COMMON LOTS ON 15.62 ACRES OF LAND IN THE L -O AND R-8 ZONING DISTRICTS FOR SAGEWOOD SUBDIVISION BY: SAGEWOOD OVERLAND, LLC APPLICANT HEARING DATE: JUNE 3, 2014 CASE NO. FP -14-023 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council on June 3, 2014 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The Final Plat of "PLAT SHOWING SAGEWOOD SUBDIVISION, LOCATED IN THE NW '/4 OF SECTION 24, T.3N., R.1 W., B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2014, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 05/08/14, CLINTON W. HANSEN, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 3," is approved subject to those conditions in the ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR SAGEWOOD SUBDIVISION (FP -14-023) Page 1 of 3 staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning Division and the Development Services Division of the Community Development Department dated June 3, 2014, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked "Exhibit A" and by this reference incorporated herein, and the response letter from Becky McKay, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked "Exhibit B" and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR SAGEWOOD SUBDIVISION (FP -14-023) Page 2 of 3 Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the I d � day of Lk -v`� , 2014. Attest: o� 0 City of E.IDTAN*- aycee lman 5ENL City Clerk By: Tammy d eerd Mayor, ' y of Meridian Copy served upon the Applicant, Planning Division, Public Works Department, and City Attorney. By: Dated: J V n 2. 19. Q o 1 y ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR SAGEWOOD SUBDIVISION (FP -14-023) Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: June 3, 2014 M�E PIDIAN TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bill Parsons, Associate City Planner 208-884-5533 Bruce Freckleton, Development Services Manager 208-887-2211 SUBJECT: FP -14-023 — Sagewood Subdivision I. APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant has applied for final plat (FP) approval for two (2) office lots, forty-five (45) single- family residential building lots and eight (8) common lots on approximately 15.62 acres of land in the L -O and R-8 zoning districts. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION/DECISION Staff recommends approval of the Sagewood Subdivision final plat subject to the conditions noted in Sections VI and VII below. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the City Council. M. PROPOSED MOTION Approval I move to approve File Number FP -14-023 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of June 3, 2014, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Denial I move to deny File Number FP -14-023, as presented during the hearing on June 3, 2014, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial.) Continuance I move to continue File Number FP -14-023 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location: (Parcel #'s: S1224212601, S1224212720 and 51224212805) The site is located on the south side of W. Overland Road; approximately 650 feet west of S. Stoddard Road in the northwest 1/4 of Section 24, Township 3 North, Range 1 West. B. Applicant: Sagewood Overland, LLC 1735 S. Millennium Way Meridian, ID 83642 C. Owners: Sagewood Overland, LLC 1735 S. Millennium Way Sagewood Subdivision FP -14-023 PAGE 1 EXHIBIT A Meridian, ID 83642 Dexter King 1195 W. Overland Road Meridian, ID 83642 D. Representative: Becky McKay, Engineering Solutions, LLP 1029 N. Rosario Street, Ste. 100 Meridian, Idaho 83642 V. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed final plat depicts two (2) office lots, forty-five (45) single-family residential building lots and eight (8) common lots on 15.62 acres of land in the L -O and R-8 zoning districts. The average lot size for the residential portion of the development is 7,289 square feet. The gross density of the development is 3.98 dwelling units per acre with a net density of 5.98 dwelling units per acre. The proposed open space for the residential portion of the development consists of a 1.12 acre pocket park, 8 -foot wide parkways, and a micropath. Qualifying open space proposed for the development is 1.61 acres which totals approximately 14.2%. The open space complies with the overall project open space approved with the Sagewood development. Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for consistency with the approved preliminary plat and found it to be in substantial conformance per UDC 11 -6B -3C as the number of buildable lots and the amount of open space are the same. VI. SITE SPECIFIC 1. Applicant shall comply with all terms of the approved Sagewood annexation (AZ -13-012), preliminary plat (PP -13-026) and recorded development agreement (DA #114034783). 2. The applicant has until December 3, 2015 to obtain City Engineer's signature on the final plat or apply for a time extension in accord with UDC 11-613-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. Per the recorded development agreement, a cross-access/ingress-egress easement shall be granted to the properties to the west and the east (parcels S1224223106 and 82928160100) as shown on the submitted concept plan. A recorded copy of the easement shall be submitted with the first Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the site OR a note added to the face of the plat that references the recorded cross access agreement. 5. Prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat, the existing structures on Lot 1, Block 2 shall be removed and all existing wells and septic systems abandoned. 6. The final plat prepared by Engineering Solutions, LLP, stamped on May 8, 2014, 2014 by Clinton W. Hansen, shall be revised as follows: a. Notes #10 and 14: Insert the recorded instrument numbers. b. Note #15: Insert recorded instrument number 114034783. c. Graphically depict a 10 -foot wide landscape buffer easement on the east boundary of Lotl, Block 1 and the west boundary of Lot 1, Block 2. Sagewood Subdivision FP -14-023 PAGE 2 EXHIBIT A 7. The landscape plan prepared by South Landscape Architecture, dated 05/07/14, is approved as submitted. 8. Details of the covered picnic area proposed for Lot 9, Block 3 shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat. 9. All fencing installed on the site shall comply with UDC 11-3A-6 and 11-3A-7. If permanent fencing does not exist at the subdivision boundary, temporary constriction fencing to contain debris shall be installed around this phase prior to release of building permits for this subdivision. 10. Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. 11. Prior to the issuance of any new building permit, the property shall be subdivided in accordance with the UDC. 12. The applicant shall comply with the submitted home elevations approved with the preliminary plat. 13. The applicant shall submit a final approval letter from the Street Naming Committee approving the street names for the proposed subdivision. 14. Prior to developing the office lots (Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2), a certificate of zoning compliance and design review application shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 15. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer, the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster, Kimberly Cutler, at 887-1620 for more information. 16. A condition was placed on the approved Preliminary Plat, which restricted the development of lots to no more than 25 until such time as another water main connection can be made or a second connection is made to the Overland Road main. This restriction has since been modified by the Meridian City Council to eliminate the restriction. 17. Due to the elevation differentials in this development, the applicant shall be required to submit an engineered master grading and drainage plan for approval by the Community Development Department. This plan shall establish, at a minimum, the finish grade elevations of the rear lot corners. The engineer will evaluate if rear yard drains are necessary and provide the drainage features necessary to control and maintain storm water drainage. Applicant's engineer shall consult the 2009 International Residential Code when establishing the finish floor elevations and drainage patterns away from the building pads. 18. With the application for a building permit, the home builder shall submit plans consistent with the approved master grading and drainage plan for the subdivision. If deviations from the approved master grading and drainage plan are proposed, they must be submitted and approved by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. Any such revision proposal shall be accompanied by a written authorization from the Developer to allow a revision to the master lot grading plan. VII. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Sanitary sewer service for this development shall be from an extension of the existing main stub in W. Overland Road adjacent to the Hardin Drain. The master planned routing traverses along the Harden Drain, across a neighboring property. The applicant will be responsible for the acquisition of the necessary temporary construction easement and permanent easements, as well Sagewood Subdivision FP -14-023 PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A as the construction of this off-site main. Failure to obtain the necessary easements for the construction of the sanitary sewer essentially renders this development unviable. 2. This development shall connect to the existing domestic water main in W. Overland Road at the intersection of S. Sagewood Avenue. The preliminary plat also shows a future connection to the south into the future Meridian School District Middle School parcel, and two other future connections to the parcel adjacent to the west. 3. Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub -grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 4. Per Meridian City Code, the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. 5. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water (MCC 12-13-8.3). The applicant shall be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 6. Any existing structures that are required to be removed shall be removed prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 7. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per UDC 11-3A-6. Plans shall be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written approval or non -approval submitted to the Public Works Department. If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, alternate plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Meridian City Engineer prior to final plat signature. 8. Any existing domestic wells within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at (208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334-2190. 9. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 10. Street signs are to be in place, water and sewer system shall be approved and activated, fencing installed, drainage lots constructed, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded, prior to applying for building permits. 11. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all uncompleted fencing, landscaping, amenities, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 12. All development improvements, including but not limited to sewer, water, fencing, micro -paths, pressurized irrigation and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. Sagewood Subdivision FP -14-023 PAGE 4 EXHIBIT A 13. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and constriction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 14. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 15. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 16. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 17. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 18. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3 -feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1 -foot above. 19. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACRD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 20. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 21. 100 Watt and 250 Watt, high-pressure sodium street lights shall be required on all public roadways per the City of Meridian Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. Street lighting is required at intersections, corners, cul-de-sacs, and at a spacing that does not exceed that outlined in the Standards. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. 22. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 23. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 24. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20 -feet wide for a single utility, or 30 -feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked Sagewood Subdivision FP -14-023 PAGE 5 EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2" x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. 25. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. V. EXHIIBITS A. Vicinity Map B. Approved Preliminary Plat C. Proposed Final Plat (stamped/dated: 05/08/14) D. Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 05/07/14) Sagewood Subdivision FP -14-023 PAGE 6 Exhibit A — Vicinity Map Vicinity Map Legend z Area of Impact Print Date: 612212014 EXHIBIT A 0 0.173 0.35 Miles The Infolmbbon shown on Ihls mat, Is compiled ream various sources eM L subject b wuslonlh Wat n_ The City w Menton moxas no warranty or Bunranro¢ as to Inc content,n¢p.,, emel..' ermmpleleassa.f"of No Colo P.20. wool ..Q.e no legal respanslbllily for the Inroanulloo contained on Ibis map_ NfE IDIZ IANC \liDAuo Sagewood Subdivision FP -14-023 PAGE 7 EXHIBIT A Exhibit B — Approved Preliminary Plat PRE Sagewood Subdivision FP -14-023 PAGE 8 EXHIBIT A Exhibit C — Proposed Final Plat (dated: 05/08/14) FLAT SHOWNO BAOMW®®D RuzzmMiIIow LOCATED IN THE NW Y OF SECTON 24. T.JN.. R.M. B.N. NENOIAN. ADA C NW. IDAHO 2014 �n�L�==i.�.xN 1111eek' av aw-u ro.i y�_ w.�rwoa �uo u.e. iurr _ r x rr o ® •mfa v� +wr I 1-7 ---- wre' x O.fflllAro POID�i.$. _ �{I f s _ 11'e jg _ i u. p F � 'N rYusw®°O•s �vv m�r�vvi°Ao'°a EMKM—Ei— BE k ernix YA. a xY0I Y ^' Me9! b uxxunm 111 8 uryeUUp ply LLO nel.n✓9` uxmrx x ENRIMffRIN6 ntl�ofeedloNc Sxltt 1 oT a SRLNlIRMR ��-yLnu�^ Sagewood Subdivision FP -14-023 PAGE 9 EXHIBIT A Exhibit D —Proposed Landscape Plan (dated: 05/07/14) gg i --W OVfiNLANDNOAD }��1 nun eamiu .•-�•—�.--.• ��8 i 11 1 _ - 1 II 1 ... I OVERALL SITE PLAN pI�G^I ENARur PIAT DATA :zc'Tm i— ® EQSl EAD Rea EOS STOs "MUNIN IMM PLAN AND � MO BOB IOMM!=AI 1 t"�w�Y-r • . —SHEET L2.0 w� ^dYuyY�Yc.,�e �u LANSCME NOTES LANDSCAPE CALCIMTIONB� SYr �^TJ: T` �SI R• � pA ��- SHEET L2.1' _ 4 _ 4 �e GENERAL LAROSOME NOTES w� ^dYuyY�Yc.,�e �u LANSCME NOTES LANDSCAPE CALCIMTIONB� SYr �^TJ: T` �SI R• Sagewood Subdivision FP -14-023 PAGE 10 EXHIBIT A s E b• ' i •• ams- wm \ �— _ - 4f-� Win• I � H i:��� ya1 uL WDA NPOR H^:. ay ?qI 1YYI �:• 1 j nz Ow i --s=-5 �'� _- ,—.- —_ 1 - ' . _�` z �-1' D r•�"fie%.v+ c.r ��� 5 •�.�. Cera—,� �" LANDS—1 CAPE PLAN em eavt• uH Hoa ovimecc errH PLAN. PLANP eHH11111L$ was }� .....•,.. soma. es assts 1.eH .m tw roa rraHaoAPH enANa eHa �L2.1 see rao voH H>.reHH sj 1 ...m 11 � �_PLIMM1M1MfILlA .� P daa4P 1AH OPHBALL eRH PWN. PLANS OOl®HLA AaD [QOTID. eHe eHHH{g LHO W Laf HOR LANDeeAP➢ PLANe S.� � �i3o Sagewood Subdivision FP -14-023 PAGE 11 E IGINEERING planning and engiieedng commundies for the lucre CLP May 29, 2014 Mayor Tammy DeWeerd and Meridian City Council 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Sagewood Subdivision Final Plat File No. FP -14-023 Dear Mayor and Council Members: 1029 N. Rosario Street, Suite 100 Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: (208) 938-0980 Fax: (208) 938-0941 E-mail: es-beckym@gwestoffice.net We have reviewed staff comments for the Meridian City Council meeting of June 3, 2014, and have the following responses: VI. SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1. The applicant will comply. 2. Understood 3. The applicant will comply. 4. The applicant will comply. 5. The applicant will comply. 6. Recorded instrument numbers will be added to Notes Nos. 10, 14 and 15 and the landscape buffer easements will be graphically depicted on the plat. 7. It is understood that the landscape plan prepared by South Landscape Architecture, dated 05/07/14, is approved as submitted. 8. The Applicant will submit details of the covered picnic area proposed for Lot 9, Block 3, for approval by the Planning Division prior to signature on the final plat. 9. All fencing installed on the site will comply with UDC I I -3A-6 and I 1-3A-7. 10. Understood. I 1. Understood. 12. The Applicant will comply with the submitted home elevations approved with the preliminary plat. 13. The Applicant will submit a final approval letter from the Sheet Naming Committee approving the street names for the proposed subdivision. C:Wacuments\2012\120726 Sagewood Subdivision\RecsResponseCC.doe Mayor and City Council May 9, 2014 Page 2 14. Certificates of zoning compliance and design review applications shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 15. The Applicant shal I provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. 16. It is understood the restriction on development until another water main connection is made was eliminated by the Meridian City Council. 17. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law were modified to read as follows: Engineered master grading and drainage plans will be submitted for approval by the Community Development Department that establishes, at a minimum; the finish floor elevation of each building W, the finish grade elevations of the rear lot corners, die drainage patterns away r E)m subsuFfaee The engineer will evaluate if rear yard drains are necessary and provide the drainage features necessary to control and maintain storm water drainage. Applicant's engineer shall consult the 2009 International Residential Code when establishing the finish floor elevations and drainage patterns away from the building pads. 18. With the application for a building permit, homebuilders will submit plans consistent with the approved master grading and drainage plan for the subdivision. If deviations from the approved master grading and drainage plan are proposed, they will be submitted and approved by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. Any such revision proposal shall be accompanied by a written authorization from the Developer to allow a revision to the master lot grading plan. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS I. The applicant will obtain all necessary easements for sanitary sewer service for this development. 2. The development will connect to the existing domestic water main in W. Overland Road at the intersection of S. Sagewood Avenue and provide connections to the south and west. 3, Applicant will coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of public right-of-way. 4. Per the recorded development agreement, a cross-access/ingress-egress easement shall be granted to the properties to the west and the east (parcels S 1224223106 and R2928160100) as shown on the submitted concept plan. A recorded copy of the easement shall be submitted with the first Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the site OR a note added to the face of the plat Chat references the recorded cross access agreement. 5. Prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat, the existing structures on Lot 1, Block 2 shall be removed and all existing wells and septic systems abandoned. 6. The applicant will comply. 7. The applicant will comply. 8. The applicant will comply. 9. The applicant will comply. 10. The applicant will comply. 11. Understood. 12. Understood. CVDocuments\20121120726 Sagewood Subdivision%=ResponseCC.doc Mayor and City Council May 9, 2014 Page 3 13. The applicant will comply. 14. Understood. 15. Understood. 16. The applicant will comply. 17. The applicant will provide compaction test results to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 18. The engineer's street centerline elevation letter was submitted with the final plat application. 19. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 20. The applicant will comply. 21. The applicant will comply. 22. The applicant will comply. 23. The applicant will comply. 24. The applicant will comply. We appreciate staff's review of this project. Sincerely, Engi eering Solution„_LL Becky McKa /[/]/�L Planner BM: ss cc: Sagewood Overland LLC C:\Documents\2012\120726 Sageaood Subdivision\RecsResponseCC.doc Meridian City Council Meeting : June 17, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: F. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement for Baltic Place Addition Subdivision IJ1I:1 =111IIZEel ki call 111*'i CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D.Rich AMOUNT .00 6 BOISE IDAHO 06/19/14 12:22 PM DEPUTY Vicky Bailey III11111111111111111111111111110IIII RECORDED—REQUEST OF 1 1 404$095 Meridian City SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE,made this day of ri(4,2014,between Cair Paravel LLC,the parties of the first part, and hereinafter called the Grantors,and the City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS,it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and other good and valuable consideration,the Grantors do hereby give,grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities,together with their maintenance,repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance,Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However,Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing,replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Baltic Place Addition Sewer& Water Easement—Cair Paravel LLC THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that theywillplace not or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall becomepart of,or lie within the ' . boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement . g Y hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is apart thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. Y q THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they a good ood and lawful right to convey said easement,and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of allp ersons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: CAIR PARAVEL C Catherine Fowler Antonelli, Manager STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of ne)4'/ ,2014, before me, the undersigned,g ed, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Catherine Fowler Antonelli, known or identified to me to be the Manager of Cair Paravel LLC,the Limited Liability Company Com an that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such Limited Liability Company executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day SHELLEY MUTH STATE OF WASHINGTON NOTARY PUBLIC \ 1 COMMISSION EXPIRES ider (SEAL) 07.8.16 NOTARY .BLIC FOR WASHINGTON Residing at: 8 Commission Expires: 7/)-- f Baltic Place Addition Sewer& Water Easement—Cair Paravel LLC GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN 4 *--7---- e" Tammy de Wee".. ayor 4.----777;7,77:-.-i -., ,,,,s,,- ---,;,4_,Nt i : i , . City 01 ''''''''ii All k _- OA , 4,,rai► ♦ 1END' N ...r Attest b alt cee L. Holman, City Clerkt-7,:, -...._ r '� ,moi. `�ti Approved By City Council On: `/*e .,F, ;\t `" ',.- STATE OF IDAHO ) : ss. County of Ada ) On this I .- day of .v r e_ 2014, before me, undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared Tammy de Weerd and Jaycee L. Holman, known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. •• %CA_tT••.. A,--0T46,44: /4+ ,,4\rtost (SEAL) ......, .10, ii, , , 4_ A Oval fri 1 TARY P BLIC FOR IDAHO • \ , Residing at: Per, of( Q". 1 , • :` '%:' jBLtr; Commission Expires: Ja .**?*6--'6 *. '• - •.. . . Baltic Place Addition Sewer& Water Easement-Cair Paravel LLC November 21, 2013 DESCRIPTION FOR MERIDIAN CITY SANITARY SEWER &WATER EASEMENTS PROPOSED BALTIC PLACE ADDITION Easements located in the Northeast 1/4 of Section 18, T. 3 N. R. 1 E., B.M., Meridian, Ada County, Idaho; more particularly described as follows: EASEMENT A Commencing at a Brass Cap monument marking the northwest corner of the NE 1/4 of said Section 18, from which a Brass Cap monument marking the northeast corner of said Section 18 bears N 89°46'09" E a distance of 2654.20 feet; thence N 89°46'09" E along the northerly boundary of said Section 18 a distance of 1327.17 feet to a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin marking the northeast corner of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said Section 18; thence S 00°29'30" W along the easterly boundary and the prolongation thereof of Baltic Place Subdivision No. 1 as shown in Book 93 of Plats on Page 11188, records of Ada County, Idaho, a distance of 447.03 feet; thence leaving said east boundary North 89°30'30"West, 249.98 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence South 00°38'34" East, 219.48 feet; Thence South 30°41'38" East, 327.24 feet to a point on a curve; Thence 30.43 feet along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 62.00 feet, a delta angle of 28°07'18", and a long chord bearing South 64°32'50"West, 30.13 feet; Thence leaving said curve North 30°41'38" West, 151.82 feet; Thence South 59°18'22" West, 26.30 feet; Thence North 30°41'38" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 59°18'22" East, 26.30 feet; Thence North 30°41'38" West, 99.28 feet; Thence South 89°21'26" West, 30.77 feet; Thence North 00°38'34" West, 277.79 feet to a point on a curve; Thence 30.45 feet along the arc of a non-tangent curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 62.00 feet, a delta angle of 28°08'15", and a long chord bearing North 83°46'56" East, 30.14 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 17,828 sf, more or less. EASEMENT B Commencing at a Brass Cap monument marking the northwest corner of the NE 1/4 of said Section 18, from which a Brass Cap monument marking the northeast corner of said Section 18 bears N 89°46'09" E a distance of 2654.20 feet; thence N 89°46'09" E along the northerly boundary of said 130521/130521-ease.docx Section 18 a distance of 1327.17 feet to a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin marking the northeast corner of the NW 1/4 of the NE 14 of said Section 18; thence S 00°2930" W along the easterly boundary and the prolongation thereof of Baltic Place Subdivision No. 1 as shown in Book 93 of Plats on Page 11188, records of Ada County, Idaho, a distance of 387.18 feet; thence leaving said east boundary North 89°30'30"West, 333.98 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence South 00°2915" West, 1.89 feet to a point of curvature; Thence 39.53 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 62.00 feet, a delta angle of 36°31'45", and a long chord bearing South 17°46'38" East, 38.86 feet; Thence leaving said curve South 67°29'19" West, 34.57 feet; Thence North 22°30'41" West, 40.47 feet; Thence North 67°29'19" East, 38.52 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 1,386 sf, more or less. \ANL L A No \C) sr 0 a 11118 2.11,0(19 F 0 w 130521/130521-ease.docx BASIS OF BEARING I 7 1/M E. FRANKLIN ROAD N 89'46'09" E 2654.20' E 1/16 - 7 8 18 1327.17 V181j1. 7 Lij Q NW 1/4 NE 1/4 NE 1/4 NE 1/4 U J M Q M N CO • b vi O S 00'29'151 w PO/NT OF BEGINNING NG N 67'29 19" E 1.89' EASEMENT B' 1,386 SFf/ I 38.52' -- ,��, N 89'30/-37W----i-1 N 22'30'41" W- C2 333.98 249.98' 140.47 N 89'3O"30'r W S167'29'19" W i, 34.57 F4,,_10 1w PO/NT OF 1 terBEG/NN/NG , , 1 6,.te *r/in- EASEMENT A r�Mr'JP-31"217827 SF f/- rc;,:gf/J6. o i v, z � 1 S 89'21'26" W -' ?. 30.77' �►�. N 30'41'38" W '`�s [WO I 99.28' �� N 59'18'22" E 26.30' ��►`�' N 30'41'38" W u.<, 20.00' 3" V?A'. S 59'18'22" W cP V A 26.30' `�� ec-- 2 E. KALISPELL ST. yeti �� I 4,Q� 4%.i.,4 � � I N • N I CURVE TABLE �x N ', \ , CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD BRG CHORD N N Cl 30.43 62.00 28'07'18" S 64'32'50" W 30.13 C2 30.45 62.00 28'08'15" N 83'46'56" E 30.14 C3 39.53 62.00 36'31'45" S 1746'38" E 38.86 SCALE 1"=200' MERIDIAN CITY SANITARY SEWER ENGINEERING DWG.DATE 11/21/13 & WATER EASEMENTS PROJ. NO. 130521 PROPOSED BALTIC PLACE ADDITION SOLUTIONS SHEET 1 OF 1 LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 18 1029 N. ROSARIO ST., STE. 100 T.3N., R.1 E., B.M. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 130521-EASE.DWG b kb MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Phone (208) 938-0980 Fax (208) 938-0941 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 17, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: 515 PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: G. Resolution No. 1q- 6 I (P : A Resolution Approving the Transfer of the Assets and Liabilities of the Meridian Heights Water and Sewer District, Ada County, Idaho, to the City of Meridian, Idaho, Pursuant to the "Agreement for the Dissolution and Transfer of Assets and Liabilities from Meridian Heights Water and Sewer District to the City of Meridian; Settlement Agreement and Release." MEETING NOTES CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. I q - q q ( BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, BORTON, CAVENER, MILAM, ROUNTREE, ZARE MBA A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF THE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF THE MERIDIAN HEIGHTS WATER & SEWER DISTRICT, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, PURSUANT TO THE "AGREEMENT FOR THE DISSOLUTION AND TRANSFER OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES FROM MERIDIAN HEIGHTS WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN; SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE." WHEREAS, the City of Meridian seeks to accept the transfer of assets and liabilities from the Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District, pursuant to the December 19, 2013, "Agreement for the Dissolution and Transfer of Assets and Liabilities From Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District to the City of Meridian; Settlement Agreement and Release'; WHEREAS, the City of Meridian finds that each of the following conditions exist, pursuant to Idaho Code § 42-3239; WHEREAS, the City of Meridian is capable of providing all of the essential functions provided by the Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District; WHEREAS, the City of Meridian has agreed to assume and perform the essential functions of the Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District, pursuant to the December 19, 2013 "Agreement for the Dissolution and Transfer of Assets and Liabilities From Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District to the City of Meridian; Settlement Agreement and Release"; WHEREAS, the City of Meridian either has acquired, or is acquiring, sufficient assets, infrastructure, and other resources to perform the essential operations of the Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District; WHEREAS, the Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District has made provisions for the retirement, payment or assumption of any and all debt, bonds, and other liabilities and obligations of the district; WHEREAS, the Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District has made provisions for the liquidation and disbursement of district assets and infrastructure not intended to be transferred to the City of Meridian; WHEREAS, the Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District has published notice in a newspaper in general circulation in the district (the Idaho Statesman) for two consecutive weeks prior to the public hearing, including information on the petition for an election on the proposed transfer, pursuant to Idaho Code § 42- 3239(2); WHEREAS, on September 10, 2013, the Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District held a public hearing to receive public testimony on the proposed transfer, and after the public hearing authorized an election, pursuant to Idaho Code § 42-3239(3); and RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TRANSFER OR ASSETS AND LIABILITIES FROM THE INIERRHAN HEIGHTS WATER & SEWER DISTRICT PAGE I OF I WHEREAS, on June 17, 2014, the Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District adopted a resolution finding that the conditions required by § 42-3239(1) exist, and approving the transfer of assets and liabilities to the City of Meridian; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That the City of Meridian finds that each of the above conditions exist. Section 2. That the City of Meridian approves the transfer of the assets and liabilities of the Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District, pursuant to the December 19, 2013 "Agreement for the Dissolution and Transfer of Assets and Liabilities From Meridian Heights Water & Sewer District to the City of Meridian; Settlement Agreement and Release." Section 3. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 17th day of June, 2014. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 17th day of June, 2014. APPROVED: Tammy,de eerd, Mayor L IP IDiA N ionuo SF�L. �1e TII ATTEST: City Clerk RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF ASSETS AND LLIDILFEIES FROM DIE MERIDIAN HEIGHTS WATER & SEWER DIS'T'RICT PAGE 2 of 2 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 17, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Fair Housing Presentation PROJECT NUMBER: MEETING NOTES J JAw� ykafe FP -- CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS .L� (alq Fair Housing Information DECEIVED JUN 9 i 20A CITY OFC bWE ID"J- CITY CLERKS OFFICE The City of Boise embraces the Fair Housing Act of 1968, and is committed to the policy of affirmatively furthering fair housing within its jurisdiction. Who is protected? The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in housing because of: • Race • Color • National Origin • Religion • Sex • Familial Status (families with children) • Disability • Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (City of Boise only) What is prohibited? The following actions are prohibited if based on a consumer's association with one or more of the protected classes listed above: • Refusal to rent or sell or negotiate for housing • Making housing unavailable • Denial of a dwelling • Setting different terms, conditions or privileges for sale or rental of a dwelling • Providing different housing services or facilities • Falsely denying that housing is available for inspection, sale or rental • Denial of access to or membership in a facility or service related to the sale or rental of housing • Steering prospective tenants to a certain neighborhood, development or unit • Refusal to make a mortgage loan or provide information regarding loans • Imposing different terms or conditions on a loan • Discrimination in appraising property • Refusal to purchase a loan • Setting different terms or conditions for purchasing a loan Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 17, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: 6B PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: B. Impact of Housing Study for the Valley by Building Contractors of Southwest Idaho MEETING NOTES CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 17, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Items Moved from Consent Agenda MEETING NOTES CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 17, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: $A PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: A. Public Works Department: Meridian Heights Water Meter Construction Budget Amendment for the Not -to -Exceed Amount of $315,000.00 MEETING NOTES CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS WIDLAAN�- Public ' "o Works Department TO: Mayor Tammy de Weerd Members of the City Council FROM: Warren Stewart DATE: June 2, 2014 Mayor Tammy de Weerd City Council Membertr Keith Bird Brad Hoaglun Charles Rountree David Zaremba SUBJECT: Meridian Heights Water Meter Construction Budget Amendment for $315,000.00. I. RECOMMENDED ACTION A. Move to: 1. Approve the Meridian Heights Water Meter Construction Budget Amendment for $315,000.00. II. DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSONS Warren Stewart, PW Engineering Manager 489-0350 Tom Barry, Director of Public Works 489-0372 III. DESCRIPTION A. Background For several years now, the City of Meridian (COM) has been working with representatives of the Meridian Heights Water and Sewer District (MHWSD) and a local property owner to bring the District's residents into the COM and end an ongoing dispute with the adjacent property owner. For the City, resolving these issues would eliminate a large impediment to development in south Meridian, and bring two existing contiguous county subdivisions into the City. After a long and sometimes difficult negotiation, an agreement was reached around the middle of 2013. For the agreement to become fully valid, the MHWSD Page 1 of 3 residents had to vote to dissolve the District, which they did in November of last year. Following that vote, Meridian City Council voted to annex the MHSWD and the adjacent property owner into the COM. B. Proposed Project MHWSD has historically billed their residents on a flat fee basis. This meant that they did not have to install water meters in order to bill for the services they provided. The COM bills based on individual consumption, which requires that a meter be installed for each home. Before the COM can take over water and sewer services from the MHWSD, water meter boxes and meters must be installed in the Meridian Heights Subdivision. This budget amendment will cover the cost to install meter boxes and meters to the homes in the Meridian Heights Subdivision. The cost for water meter installation was contemplated in the Three Party Agreement approved by the Council in 2013. The dollar amount requested in this amendment is less than the amount originally contemplated in the Three Party Agreement. Fortunately, water meter boxes were already installed in the Kentucky Ridge Subdivision and meters have already been added (but are not live) in anticipation of the transfer of ownership later this year. C. Contractor Selection The plans and specifications for this project are currently out to bid. This Budget Amendment is being processed now to insure that funding for the project is available when a contractor is selected. This project is also on the critical path of work that needs to be completed in order to fulfill the City's obligations under the Three Party Agreement and ensure the transfer of ownership and operations can take place by the end of 2014 as outlined in the agreement. IV. IMPACT A. Service/Delivery Impact: This project will expand the COM service area, eliminate a competing service provider, facilitate growth, bring an end to an expensive lawsuit, and ensure quality long term utility services to the residents of the MHWSD. B. Fiscal Impact: With this Budget Amendment, we are seeking to reallocate funds from a sewer main extension project that had to be canceled because private property owners were unwilling to grant the City the necessary easements. In addition, we are seeking to reallocate the remaining portion of the money needed from a main line replacement project that came in under budget. Therefore, we are not asking for Page 2 of 3 new money to be appropriated, only to reallocate funds from projects already approved in the 2014 budget. Proiect Costs Funding Needed $315,000 Total $315,000 Available Fundine Sewer Line Extensions $200,000 Sewer Main Replacements $115,000 Total $315,000 VI. TIME CONSTRAINTS Council's timely approval will allow completion of this project by the end of the year, thus fulfilling our obligation in the Three Party Agreement and allowing for the orderly transfer of ownership and operations of the Districts assets. Page 3 of 3 City Of Meridian Statement of Revenues and Expenditures - Rev and Exp Report - Todd 60 - Enterprise Fund 3590 - WWTP Construction Projects From 10/1/2013 Through 9/30/2014 TOTAL EXPENDITURES WITH TRANSFERS 643,423.26 184,609.64 458,813.62 Date: 6/11/14 09,14:59 AM Page, 1 Budget with Current Year Budget Amendments Actual Remaining Capital Outlay 93505 Sewer Line Extensions 290,133.20 0.00 290,133.20 0766 Franklin, TenMile to 65,923.26 16,322.20 49,601.06 Linder W/S Design 0766h ACHD Franklin Rd - Ten 0.00 70,000.00 (70,000.00) Mile to Linder Construction 10033 Ashford Greens Sewer 225,000.00 0.00 225,000.00 Pipeline 10033.d Ashford Greens Trunk Sewer 0.00 60,099.00 (60,099.00) - Design 10198 Ustick Rd, Locust Grove to 17,500.00 1,825.31 15,674.69 Leslie Way Util Imprvmnts 10369 Franklin and Black Cat 15,000.00 6,496.33 8,503.67 Intersection Water Improvements 10432 ACHD Ustick Meridian Rd 29,866.80 29,866.80 0.00 Utility Improvements Total Capital Outlay 643.423.26 184 609.64 458.813.62 DEPT EXPENDITURES 643,423.26 184,609.64 458,813.62 TOTAL EXPENDITURES WITH TRANSFERS 643,423.26 184,609.64 458,813.62 Date: 6/11/14 09,14:59 AM Page, 1 City Of Meridian Statement of Revenues and Expenditures - Rev and Exp Report - Todd 60 - Enterprise Fund 3590 - WWTP Construction Projects From 10/1/2013 Through 9/30/2014 Uatei 6/11/14 09114,38 AM Pages 1 Budget with Current Year Budget Amendments Actual Remaining Capital Outlay 95000 Service Line/Main / \ Replacement \ / 328,738.91 0.00 328,738. 0000 NON -DEPARTMENTAL 0.00 2,500.00 (2,500.00) 10005 ACHD Split Corridor, Phase 205,000.00 3,298.46 201,701.54 2 30005b Split Corridor Ph 2 0.00 132,713.57 (132,713.57) Construction 10234 Downtown Sewer Line 56,000.00 3,068.70 52,931.30 Replacements Sites 10-12 10234.c Elm Street Sewer Main Site 0.00 48,120.00 (48,120.00) 12a 10329 NW 8th ST Sewer Trunk Main 974,736.71 31,439.00 943,297.71 Broadway to Cherry Ph2 Design 10329a NW 8th ST Sewer Trunk Main 0.00 602,935.60 (802,935.60) Broadway to Cherry Ph2 Constructi 10330 NW 8th St Sewer Trunk Main 49,800.00 49,800.00 0.00 Broadway to Cherry Ph 3 Design 10366 Five Mile Trunk Relief - 11,919.29 11,919.29 0.00 8th Street Park 10394 Sewer Line Replacement - 40,000.00 5,954.10 34,045.90 NE 3rd St 10400 Sewer Line Replacements - 15,000.00 6,441.00 8,559.00 Big 0 Fairview 10413 Sewer Line Replacements - 13,500.00 13,154.47 345.53 Sites 14 & 15 10413.a Sewer Line Replacement - 0.00 51,332.30 (51,332.30) Site 14 - Construction 10478 Sewer Collection System 24,512.00 24,512.00 0.00 Rehabilitation & Replacement Program 10495 Meridian Interchange 145,000.00 145,000.00 0.00 Rebuild Sewer Improvements - ITD 10499 Sewer Line Replacement - 136,659.00 136,659.00 0.00 Site 12b Total Capital Outlay 2.000.865.91 1,468,847.49 532.018.42 DEPT EXPENDITURES 2,000,865.91 1,468,847.49 532,018.42 TOTAL EXPENDITURES WITH 2,000,865.91 1,468,847.49 532,018.42 TRANSFERS Uatei 6/11/14 09114,38 AM Pages 1 City Of Meridian Statement of Revenues and Expenditures - Rev and Exp Report - Todd 60 - Enterprise Fund 3490 - Water Construction Projects From 10/1/2013 Through 9/30/2014 TOTAL EXPENDITURES WITH 797,044.10 340,637.32 456,406.78 TRANSFERS Date. 6/11/14 09.15.33 AM page: 1 Budget with Current Year Budget Amendments Actual Remaining Capital Outlay 95000 Service Line/Main Replacement 301,959.60 0.00 301,959.60 10005 ACHE, Split Corridor, Phase 297,044.06 6,510.99 290,533.07 2 1OOO5b Split Corridor Ph 2 0.00 136,145.40 (136,145.40) Construction 10237 Water Line Replacement - 82,418.34 5,413.34 77,005.00 ME 5th St 1O237.a Waterline Replacement WE 0.00 77,148.00 (77,148.00) 5th St - Construction 10439 Waterline Replacement E 28,920.00 0.00 28,920.00 Antilles E St Martin to End 10439.a Water Line Replacement - E 0.00 28,920.00 (28,920.00) Antilles Ct - Design 10440 Waterline Replacement E 32,687.10 32,687.10 0.00 Williams Main St to 3rd St 10443 Waterline Replacement- E 26,225.00 1,500.00 24,725.00 Loch Meadow, N Laughridge to End 1O443.a Waterline Rplcmnt- Loch 0.00 26,225.00 (26,225.00) Meadow, Laughridge to End - Design 10444 Waterline Replacement- S 11,890.00 0.00 11,890.00 Lynhurst P1, W Pennwood St to End 1O444.a Waterline Rplacmnt- S 0.00 11,890.00 (11,890.00) Lynhurst P1, W Pennwood St to End Dsgn 10445 Waterline Replacement- S 15,900.00 14,197.49 1,702.51 Heidi P1, W Kimra St to End Total Capital Outlay 797.044 10 340.637 32 456.406 78 DEPT EXPENDITURES 797,044.10 340,637.32 456,406.78 TOTAL EXPENDITURES WITH 797,044.10 340,637.32 456,406.78 TRANSFERS Date. 6/11/14 09.15.33 AM page: 1 W �° E fbi 0 LL I � a m N O) II fn � d a d � � E of N V O C o v w 3 D 0 N � A> m 1; `a v L 3 'v o` o mxa�C = = C d Y > n raw nom+ a co 3 o c U m N w O D N C Ed > d C p t U O d N m U v v > d v v r m 3 v $ « 5 J v O > EE c � "04 o 3 -_ v v o t 3 E J « E v v v 3 c o v o von d d v N D y cam n 3 � d a a n t J C L C« a N 5 c E v o - g v c D v � ig o c v W « Y 0 y a c W d = d a 6hr v.� N d C ? YL « o « y r E'^_ E d j D o v A o x c d E =° W D N a N Y d O NU, v c v 0 3 Y v n v E pnx c d m c 0 E v 3 n m c u 2= s a m m « w Ei c a o�vviF � T C N U o C T N O ry m v m 2, m U u v y o a a` $ c o 0 cN n C v c '^ o Y = c ry 2 r c = n� v 3 v N « c s r d N Q 0 0 c p v E m v p = m o m a y o« n m` a O 6 L N 3 v � L V C o v m E aV m w v m x c v m j O � d E � o w v a v«i E L O 8g 3 z 00 0 o E a o N NK D a c D J m a 'c N E m S p m c OU v p m E v o E 0 v � c 0 v v a 3 c o w o a O N a o a = o J 3Nm « D� c v m >o Q N V n r a w C N E m II � C II Ol � m 'a w m p� U � C R d � m � p O M W U w II 0 O N E ac"m C V L O o R 0 �n mw .a�Em sO Q O N Q A c II N >� me rnE 0 Q E o � E v �1 N 67 p U 0 II a Vi oa' m N N II 0.- > C O O 0 C Q. C p Eo ° 0-0 C II 0 II C C •` o c E o r 3 II w N m C r E o 0 E �m O a y II m m U d L W O m U '1 L k N % Le L N YCU 0 i N E _ U N r 0. N m C d d LL } U A O m W C N a W �° E fbi 0 LL I � a m N O) II fn � d a d � � E of N V O C o v w 3 D 0 N � A> m 1; `a v L 3 'v o` o mxa�C = = C d Y > n raw nom+ a co 3 o c U m N w O D N C Ed > d C p t U O d N m U v v > d v v r m 3 v $ « 5 J v O > EE c � "04 o 3 -_ v v o t 3 E J « E v v v 3 c o v o von d d v N D y cam n 3 � d a a n t J C L C« a N 5 c E v o - g v c D v � ig o c v W « Y 0 y a c W d = d a 6hr v.� N d C ? YL « o « y r E'^_ E d j D o v A o x c d E =° W D N a N Y d O NU, v c v 0 3 Y v n v E pnx c d m c 0 E v 3 n m c u 2= s a m m « w Ei c a o�vviF � T C N U o C T N O ry m v m 2, m U u v y o a a` $ c o 0 cN n C v c '^ o Y = c ry 2 r c = n� v 3 v N « c s r d N Q 0 0 c p v E m v p = m o m a y o« n m` a O 6 L N 3 v � L V C o v m E aV m w v m x c v m j O � d E � o w v a v«i E L O 8g 3 z 00 0 o E a o N NK D a c D J m a 'c N E m S p m c OU v p m E v o E 0 v � c 0 v v a 3 c o w o a O N a o a = o J 3Nm « D� c v m >o Q N V n r a w C N E m II � C II Ol � m 'a w m p� U � C R d � m � p O M W U w II 0 O N E ac"m C V L O o R 0 �n mw .a�Em sO Q O N Q A c II N >� me rnE 0 Q E o � E v �1 N 67 p U 0 II a Vi oa' m N N II 0.- > C O O 0 C Q. C p Eo ° 0-0 C II 0 II C C •` o c E o r 3 II w N m C r E o 0 E �m O a y II m m U d L W O m U O LL F Z W Z az 0 W �a wF yO (7 F � U 133 UI F• > .Q v a w II M '1 Y I l I R C N 0 Q } Ess Ib` , 0 [) C) C) C) 0 0 b9 K W a o 0 0 X 0 E 2 v w uio o v a MN! � v \y� er r e» N N m N C O m N 4).0 C 0 � Y « (� a m c F C 0 C 0 O II U\ Y c m Q N N m Z w a 0 X co U) U) w 0- 0 Q O N :30 0 E X w N J 0 C p O O m rn 0.Fla- p a R j LL c 00 F m ° 00 m 0) E N C N M Q 0 E m U N N N F !n o N °�r d a W aU a E O �d0 m LLa�ww O Z N z 0 F• J Z C O U O (O O r N 0 N 0: 0'0 0 0 G N N N NN O O NN O O W a U U av0 ��.. NN vavvQ NN N a" o w M '1 Y .0 l I Q } Ess Ib` , w v Y .0 Q } Ess II C 0 [) C) C) C) b9 K W a o 0 0 X 0 E v w uio o v E MN! � v \y� er r e» N N m w m 4).0 C 0 � c� (� a m F C 0 C V II U\ Y c m Q N m Z w to 0 X U) U) w 0- 0 Q O rw.. :30 d LF• J 0 O) s O d = r c m 0 ss v N 0c N II ma r m w E m `0 0 >, O m C O 0R ''0 E v Y Q Ess II C 0 [) C) C) C) a o 0 0 X Ooo v w uio o v E MN! � v va er e� e» N N m w m 4).0 C 0 � a 0 m a m C 0 C V II N m to 0 X U) U) U rw.. :30 d J 0 O 0.Fla- p ami2Lo UO F m 00 m 0) z z _ CL M M 0 N C U 0 FOo J O) s O d = r c m 0 ss v N 0c N II ma r m w E m `0 0 >, O m C O 0R ''0 E Y Q v v E w r av N to LU Z :30 d O O z O 0 N C 0 J o = a m O F• J Z m 0 U f7 O) s O d = r c m 0 ss v N 0c N II ma r m w E m `0 0 >, O m C O 0R ''0 E Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 17, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: 8B PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: B. Parks and Recreation Department: Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Amendment Regarding Grant Revenue for Settlers Village Square Phase 2 for a Not -to -Exceed Amount of $8,500.00 MEETING NOTES CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS w � /p § 2 � 0 ( m § � « LU § ( / / \ / \ E} / � ( / k } k a }ca mz\a \\ \L / � /p § 2 � 0 ( m § � « LU § E} \\ )[ §« �f E §§ :2 - r \\ -/ |cn -12 _ LU 7)$ \Ik ) sof$ _ )) f; # - 22§� - ƒ} /\kCL /\ \ {I§ co (=|cma - - / )) \ ( \/§) m zi \- \ \\/\ �\ ��\\ a ]\k) _p _ 2222 -_ 0 \, - - >1 W: F- 4? \< /( k 0w �LMm ° ]/!J wca w#J) w§ jo) Z W 0 o. N 4 W % d " W G O 0 0 oQE a O (n J L W Z T Q w U z U Q Ol W JQ Z� Z(n lA fR 0 0 OJ U) U a !L J W OZ W } o 0 a r w W 0 Lm (7 Ol F Q O {L H Z W 2 zIn Q Z W K a wF rO (� U m ro- N C d " W G O 0 0 oQE a O T ) O fA EH lA fR fR � W Lq N S C O O m L O O v � � N P 1 r } O N O 3 O C m c ao u, l0 0 x O 0 N v } O V O 0 E K W Lq o N In r E ao U `m to F o 0 m Ul a� c O c C LU v m W O E 0 N C N LL p_ N 0 d K v 0 U N 0y m m wF-r — Qw Y o.0 a Ea- v m M> a r 0 FLa�wZ w `0 E J Z N � � = Z v N N F X O) d W O C D 0 O{ O O N M N K 0 _V d N N N M O O O O w � U Z Z V V V NN a V NNO' V V a0 Q O V U m 0 O Z c F0 m IL 0 O. T ) O IJ\J a rn 0 W Lq N S C O O m L O O v � � � P 1 r } O 3 Y m c ao u, l0 0 x O 0 O v } O V O U a, Lq o C In r E ao ~ to Q co 0 Ul c O LU v ¢ W O C=7 o N c N K v 0 U E K — OI y3 0 a r C :o 0 � � = Fc v N F X O) d W U W v O U) J O T M ¢ � Z Z aF- 5m U a0 F O V U m 0 O Z c F0 m 0 W W a c o A `w CL O I - N T ) O IJ\J a rn 0 Lq N S C O O m L O O v � � � P 1 r 0 O 3 s_ m c ao u, l0 0 x O 0 O v W O V O U a, Lq o C In r E ao ~ Q co 0 Ul c O LU v ¢ U v O C=7 o N c K v 0 U Z K — OI y3 0 a O C :o 0 � � = Fc v N F X d W U W v O J O T M ¢ m0 Z Z aF- 5m rn a0 F O U m 0 O U F0 N T ) IJ\J a rn c S C O O O O v � � � P 1 0 O 3 s_ m N u, l0 E 0 o G1 v Z U V U N R) o C r ~ Q 0 N a U O O O O O O a o u, l0 E C ~ Ul LU v ¢ O C=7 o K v Z K — 0 O C 0 � = N F c O v O J Z Z U 0 Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 17, 2014 PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Future Meeting Topics MEETING NOTES j�- CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian City Council Meeting DATE: June 17, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: 10. Executive Session Per Idaho State Code 67-2345 (1)(c)(d)(f): (c) To Conduct Deliberations Concerning Labor Negotiations or to Acquire an Interest in Real Property, Which is Not Owned by a Public Agency, (d) To Consider Records that are Exempt from Disclosure as Provided in Chapter 3, Title 9, Idaho Code, and (f) To Consider and Advise Its Legal Representatives in Pending Litigation MEETING NOTES -7 CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS