6A) Letter from Brighton Regarding Bainbridge Sub No. 2 FPe~
BRIGHTON
CORPORATION
January 2, 2014
Mayor Tammy DeWeerd and Meridian City Council
Meridian City Hall
Subject: Bainbridge Subdivision
Dear Mayor and Council,
Bainbridge Subdivision No. 2 was conditionally approved by the Council on December 17th with
the following modified condition:
11. _ _
The proposed
' development will not have adequate fire flow when attached as proposed to the current
water distribution system. 0 site improvements must be made by the developer or others
to provide fire flow. No buildingpermits shall be issued until the Cit~n ig'neer
determines through modelin~or field tests that adequate , ire flow is available for the
entire development.
That followed discussion of Public Works' proposed 30 [24]-lot limitation of development on a
single water source. The issue was first encountered when the Council considered and approved
the 43-lot first phase of Bainbridge on September 3, 2013. That approval-with the 24-lot
limit-was subject to:
1) Staff providing "the DEQ requirements and city policy and all pertinent information...
and that staff still meet with Brighton...to see if there are other alternatives that would
allow full development of phase one.... "
(Attachment 1-Councilman Hoaglun, Meridian City Council September 3, 2013 minutes, p.16 of 23)
2) Because the matter was a "continuing subject, "the applicant would not be charged an
"additional fee... if we are going to discussion f sic] that further. "
(Attachment 1-Councilman Zaremba, Meridian City Council minutes, pgs.16-17 of 23)
With regard to the first "subject to, "Brighton and staff met on September 9th to discuss water
system modeling and again on October 11th to review the results of that effort. The conclusions
of modeling (Attachment 2 -October 21, 2013 a-mail message to Kyle Radek and Bruce Freckleton):
• .There will be sufficient pressure and fire flow capacity in the Black Cat water main to
adequately serve the 43 lots in Bainbridge Subdivision No. 1.
12641 w. Explorer Drive, Suite 200, BQise,1D 83713 ~ www.BrightanCorp.com (208.378.4440 ~ Fax; 208.377.8962
Page 2
• Meridian City is designing and intends to construct a PRV connection in McMillan
Road. With that in place, there will be sufficient pressure and capacity for the 93-lot
Bainbridge Subdivision No. 2.
• Development beyond Bainbridge phases 1 ~ 2 will require a second connection, either
east to Ten Mile Road or south to the Volterra main.
Based on those conclusions and, in conjunction with the Council's September 3rd direction and
December 18th discussion, I request Council approval of the Bainbridge No. 2 Final Plat Order,
as proposed, and relief from the "qualified, " 24-lot limitation of Bainbridge No. l .
Respectfully,
David Turnbull
12fo1 W. ~xpiorer Grive, Suite BOO, Boise, ID 83713 I www.BrightonCorp,com (08.378.4000 ~ Fax 208.377.852
ATTACHMENT 1
Meridian GAY council
September 3, 2493
page 16 of 23 he would know that It~S
to o farther, but at least t Y er
er would enable them g able wlth that. The ath
or the week aft ~ ed. I would be comfort Iot
nd the can get It start ' ned -- (know we do a
on the books a Y ~ has also been mentla
in t4 bring upf which .
thing #hat (was go 9 ntractars Assoc1etlon -.
' ation with the Building Co
of col~rmunic nd then, we
' the motion an the table a ,
. ba can we just keep It to
De V~eerd. Mr. Zarem ,
will --
l will save that cornrnent•
Zaremba•
• -- o an our sjde road. ~kaY• r
De Weerd. g Y
I will save that comment.
Zaremba
d: An thing fiurther? Okay,
De UVeer y
e vatin on the motion?
• substitute motlan ar are w 9
Rountree: Sa, IS there a ,
• ~ otion. Let me do this, ~,et
ickl doing ww rethlnkmg the m
n: Madam Mayor, ! m qu y
Ha~gl~ .
r~r my moon.
rd: Qaes second agree?
pewee
Rountree: Yes, secand agrees.
De Weerd: Okay.
FP 13-
H And 1~ me try ~t again based on tt~ infArmation -that rre approve
p3~,~ y~th ~e ~4 buNal~uJ ~m~ as per aty pd~cY, but also that staff be direc~eol 10 Nov' e
y~li the DEQ uirerr end ~ 1 and aU merit i~rma~on
C~ Gourwti~
required - or thaf involves #hat, including Oak Creek conditions that have been done m
the past. That's something new, Kyle. Aid ~-st s't~f 8t~~ meek W~~h hta-" 'ins thaf
.weak ~ sae ~ e are other akemati~es #hat woad aibw fi~
the uhs~se cans e~r- w~- a~prOVa) of the ff we a rove
have a car~ment that is on the subject.
• I would second that and i do
Zaremba. .
De Weerd: okay.
are an ~ rote on ~ . ' ht. the
t that even th
l ~~ ch the........ banal
--
. sub.. t a I ~~ not
•
s ~ auld wra a the ~~
~, s been the ed sh
t
Bird: hovers it.
ATTACHMEN
Mike Wardle
From: David Turnbull
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 3:08 PM
To: Kyle Radek; Bruce Freckleton
Cc: ~ Mike Wardle; Gene Smith
Subject: Bainbridge Water System
Bruce and Kyle,
Thank you for meeting with us last week to review the conclusions of recent waters stem modelin for
Y g
~~ Bainbridge Subdivision. As I understand the results of that effort:
• There will be sufficient pressure and fire-flow capacity in the Black Cat water main to ade uatel serve
. ... q Y
the 43 lots in Bainbridge Subdivision No. l .
• Meridian City is designing and intends to construct a PRV connection in McMillan Road. With that in
place, there will be sufficient pressure and capacity for the 93-lot Bainbridge Subdivision No. 2.
• Development beyond Bainbridge phases 1 & 2 will require a second connection, either east to Ten Mile
Road or south to the Volterra main.
This information addresses the 24-lot building permit limitation policy proposed by staff in Bainbrid e
... ., g
Subdivision No. lsite-specific condition #9. Therefore, I request reconsideration of the pro osed 24-lot
. p
limitation and approval of the following proposal:
• That Bainbridge Subdivision No. l be approved without limitation.
• That Bainbridge Subdivision No. 2 be approved, without limitation, subject only to completion of the
PRV connection to the Ten Mile system.
• That a second water main connection be provided as a condition of approval of future Bainbridge
phases.
I appreciate your cooperation and assistance in this resolution.
Best regards,
David Turnbull President
B~i~ta ~~rpc~ratior~ v~~,~~~~:~~,~~r,c~€~
~~~i~~ ~(~8.378,4~~~
BRIGHTON
CORPORATION
January 2, 2014
Ma or Tammy DeWeerd and Meridian City Council
Y
Meridian City Hall
Subject: Bainbridge Subdivision
Dear Mayor and Council,
• ' ' ' itionall a roved b the Council on December 17th with
Bainbridge Subdivision No. 2 was cond y pp y
the following modified condition:
-,...,., ~ .. ~...,., ~ ~ v ~ .
• .The propose
' develo ment will not have ade uate ire ow when attached as ro osed to the current
water distribution stem. 0 site im rovements must be made b the develo er or of ers
to rovide ire ow. No buildin ermits shalt be issued until the Ci En ineer
determines throw h modelin or field tests that ade uate ire ow is available or t e
entire development.
That followed discussion of Public Works' proposed 30 [24]-lot limitation of development on a
sin le water source. The issue was first encountered when the Council considered and approved
g
the 43-lot first hase of Bainbridge on September 3, 2013. That approval-with the 24-lot
p
limit-was subject to:
1 Staff roviding "the DEQ requirements and city policy and alt pertinent information...
p
and that sta still meet with Brighton... to see if there are other alternatives that would
allow f ull development of phase one.... "
(Attachment 1-Councilman Hoaglun, Meridian City Council September 3, 2013 minutes, p.16 of 23)
2 Because the matter was a "continuing subject, "the applicant would not be charged an
~~
"additional fee...if we are going to discussion sic] that further.
(Attachment 1-Councilman Zaremba, Meridian City Council minutes, pgs.16-17 of 23)
the first "sub'ect to " Bri hton and staff met on September 9th to discuss water
With regard to ~ g th
s stem modelin and again on October 11 to review the results of that effort. The conclusions
Y g
of modeling (Attachment 2 -October 21, 2013 a-mail message to Kyle Radek and Bruce Freckleton):
• .There will be sufficient pressure and fire flow capacity in the Black Cat water main to
adequately serve the 43 lots in Bainbridge Subdivision No. 1.
1261 UU. Expiorer Drive, Suite 200, Boise, ID 83713 ~ www.BrightonCorp.com { 2Q8,378.4404 ~ Fax; 28.377,8962
Page 2
' ' i is desi nin and intends to construct a PRV connection in McMillan
• Meridian C ty g g ,
' h that in lace there will be sufficient pressure and capacity for the 93-lot
Road. Wtt p ,
Bainbridge Subdivision No. 2.
ment be and Bainbrid e hases 1 & 2 will require a second connection, either
Develop y g p
east to Ten Mile Road or south to the Volterra main.
' con'unction with the Council's September 3rd direction and
Based on those conclusions and, in ~
r 18th discussion Ire uest Council approval of the Bainbridge No. 2 Final Plat Order,
Decembe ~ 9
as ro osed and relief from the "qualified, " 24-lot limitation of Bainbridge No. 1.
p p
Respectfully,
David Turnbull
1201 Ilil. Explorer Dave, Suite 200, Boise, ID 837'13 ~ uvww.BrightonCorp.com ~ 208.378.4000 ~ fax: 208.377.892
- - ATTACHMENT 1
Meridian ~~y ccuncii
September 3, 2013
page 16 of 23
ar the week after, would enable them to ga farther, but at least they would know that it's
an the books and they can get it started. I would be canlfartable with that. The other
#hing that f was going to bring up, which has also been mentioned -- I know we do a lot
of communication with the Building Contractors Association --
De Weerd: Mr. Zaremba, can we just keep it to the motion an the table and, then, we
r~rill --
Zaremba: I will save that comment.
De Weerd: --goon your side road, okay.
Zaremba: I will save that comment.
De Weerd: Anything further? okay.
Rountree: Sa, is there a substitute matiar~ or are we voting on the n~otian?
~ r~~ Madam Mayor, I'm quickly doing -~ rethinking the motion. Let me do this. ~.~t
y rncar~.
De Weerd: Does second agree?
Rountree: Yes, second agrees.
De Weerd: okay.
And ~ ~ act lea ~ ~nf~rrr~ati .~ fat we mow FP 13-
~e ~ 1" aty , ~ a a#t bye d~t~ to pl'Q
~! ~ ~ C~ urne and and a~ ant formation
' -- or that involves that, including yak Creek conditions that have been done in
the past, That's something new, ~Cyle. Aid fat s ~rht~ d~rin~ that
ac to a~ ~ the other a tiers that air #~ d~v ~ that -- of
c~, ~ h ~-al ~f the ~• i~ rye ap~~ the ~4 k~u~#dina iofis.
Zaremba: I would second that and I do have a comment that is on the subject.
De Weerd: okay.
I wow ~ugaat that eve tt~r~h are ~oin~ tv vote ~n it tit, tl~
s ~ t ~g s~~-ct -- a I rat chafe tt applicant an ' ' nai
_ _ ._~.
#ee -- t fee that's begin charged should w~ ~p the ..Y
Bird: havers it.
~ r ~' ~
Meridian City Cfluncil
September 3, 2x13
Pale 17 of 23
..ra~ba: __ total solution to this, even if it`s onl~r a partial solution tonight ark we
continue discusso it. Does that make sense?
Bird: Yeah.
De Weerd: Qnly if it makes sense to Mr. Nary. I know what you're saying, but --
: 1# shy ! a separate application to e~te~ the I~~+~d the ~4 if we are
~oln~to di$cussioon that further.
De Weerd: Qkay.
Bird: Motion agrees.
De Weerd: Any further discussion? Qkay. Tip: rn~n is ~~ a~pproy~ !tern 7-A with the
-~ adtt~~al con~n~ents as rovided b Mr. I-I~ lun and second b Mr. ~arernba.
Madam Clerk, will you call roll.
Roll Call; Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Hoaglun, yea.
De Weerd: All ayes, Motion carried.
MQTit~N CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item ~: Department Reports
A, ~conornic Development Department: Strategic Plan Upda#e
ae Weerd: Qkay. item 8~A was requested to be continued to September 2~th. It does
not require a motion.
B. Solid 1Naste Advisory Carnmission: Republic Services
Annual Rate Adjustment for Solid Ul~aste Collection Services
De Weerd: !tern 8-B is a report from our Solid Waste Advisory Commission and, Mr.
Cary, are you going to lead this? Thank you. vUelcome.
Cory: Thank you, Madam Mayor, Members of the City Council. My name is Steve
Cory, I'm yourchairman of the Solid vUaste Advisory Commission and at our last regular
meeting we had Republic Services present to us their review of their cost of living
increase and other aspects of their franchise rate structure. The cornrnission went
ahead and asked questions and felt comfortable with what was presented and voted to
recommend to you that the rate structure proposed for ~Y-~D~~ be approved and
because of the detailed nature of #hat I'd like to go ahead and call forward Rodney
Remling of Republic Services to go ahead and discuss the details of that presentation.
ATTACHMENT 2
Mike Wardle
From: David Turnbull
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 3:08 PM
To: Kyle Radek; Bruce Freckleton
Cc: Mike Wardle; Gene Smith
Subject: Bainbridge Water System
Bruce and Kyle,
Thank you for meeting with us last week to review the conclusions of recent water system modeling for
Bainbridge Subdivision. As I understand the results of that effort:
• There will be sufficient pressure and fire-flow capacity in the Black Cat water main to adequately serve
the 43 lots in Bainbridge Subdivision No. l .
• Meridian City is designing and intends to construct a PRV connection in McMillan Road. With that in
place, there will be sufficient pressure and capacity for the 93-lot Bainbridge Subdivision No. 2.
• Development beyond Bainbridge phases 1 & 2 will require a second connection, either east to Ten Mile
Road or south to the Volterra main.
This information addresses the 24-lot building permit limitation policy proposed by staff in Bainbridge
Subdivision No. lsite-specific condition #9. Therefore, I request reconsideration ofthe proposed 24-lot
limitation and approval of the following proposal:
• That Bainbridge Subdivision No. l be approved without limitation.
• That Bainbridge Subdivision No. 2 be approved, without limitation, subject only to completion of the
PRV connection to the Ten Mile system.
• That a second water main connection be provided as a condition of approval of future Bainbridge
phases.
I appreciate your. cooperation and assistance in this resolution.
Best regards,
David Turnbull President
~~ihta ~~rpc~ra~ia ~,~~~:~r~c~~o-~~r
~6`~ i, ~:x~~~~~r, ~~~~ ~ ~~~, Ids ~.
~~i~~ ~F~.3~8.~~~~