CZC 13-087 ACHD CommentsSara M. Baker, President
John 5. Franden, Vice President
Rebecca W. Arnold, Commissioner
Mitchell A. Jaurena, Commissioner
Jim Hansen, Commissioner
Date: June 5, 2013
To: Ralph Lowe
MGT Legacy Church
1507 N. Meridian Road
Meridian, ID 83642
Subject: MCZC-13-061
1419 N. Meridian Road
On June 5, 2013 the Ada County Highway District Staff acted an your application for the above
referenced project. The attached report lists site-specific requirements, conditions of approval and
street improvements, which are required.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (208} 387-6174
Sincerely,
~ w~
Jarom Wagoner
Planner II
Development Services
Ada County Highway District
CC: Project file
City of Meridian (sent via email}
David Crawford, B&A Engineers Inc. (sent via email}
Ada County Highway District • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 208-387-6100 • FX 345°7650 • www.achdidaho.org
Development Services Departrraent
Project/File; MCZC-'13-06'i
This is a certificate of zoning compliance to expand an existing church parking lot.
The site is located at 1419 N. Meridian Road in Meridian, Idaho.
Lead Agency: City of Meridian
Site address: 1419 N. Meridian Road
Staff Approval: June 5, 2013
Applicant: Ralph Lawe
MGT Legacy Church
1507 N. Meridian Road
Meridian, ID 83642
Representative: David Crawford
B&A Engineers, Inc.
5505 W. Franklin Road
Boise, ID 83705
Staff Contact: Jarom Wagoner
Phone: 387-6174
E-mail: i~^ragoner~achdidaho.org
Tech Review: May 28, 2013 J May 30, 2013
l4. in~ngs ®f Fa~~
1. Description of Application: The applicant is requesting to expand an existing church parking
lot.
2. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area:
birection Land Use Zoning
North Medium-Low Densit Residential District R-4
South Medium-Low Densit Residential District R-4
East Community Business District C-C
West Medium-Low Density Residential District R-4
3. Site History: ACHD has not previously reviewed this site for a development application,
4. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any
building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in
effect at that time.
2 MCZC-13-061
5. Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)/Five Year Work Plan (FYWP):
There are currently no roadways, bridges or intersections in the general vicinity of the project that
are currently in the District's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP),
® Meridian Road is currently under construction to be widened to 5 lanes from Cherry Lane to
Broadway Avenue as part of the Meridian Split Corridor project.
Traffic Findings f®r ~nsiderati®n
Trip Generation: This request is estimated to not generate any additional trips as it is for a
rezone only. Actual estimates will depend on the proposed use at time of development.
2. Condition of Area Roadways
Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour (VPH}
PM Peak PM Peak Existing
Roadway Frontage Functional Hour Hour Level Plus
Classification Traffic Count of Service Project
Meridian
65 feet Principal
551
"D"
"D"
Road grterial
1S` Street 65 feet Local NIA N/A NIA
Acceptable level of service for atwo-lane principal arterial is "E" (690 VPH}.
3. Average Daily Traffic Count (VDT)
Average daily traffic counts are based on ACHfl's most current traffic counts.
The average daily traffic count for Meridian Road south of Fairview Avenue was 10,892
on November 17, 2009.
Findings f®r C®nsiderati®n
Meridian Road
a. Existing Conditions: Meridian Road is currently under construction to be improved with 5-
travel lanes, vertical curb, gutter, and 7-foot wide sidewalk abutting the site. There is 96 feet
of right-of-way for Meridian Road (48 feet from centerline).
b. Policy:
Arterial Roadway Policy: District Policy 7205.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for
improving all street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is taken
to all of the adjacent streets.
Master Street Map and Typology Policy: District Policy 7205.5 states that the design of
improvements for arterials shall be in accordance with District standards, inc}uding the Master
Street Map and Livable Streets Design Guide. The developer or engineer should contact the
District before starting any design.
Street Section and Right-of-Way Width Policy: District Policies 7205.2.1 & 7205.5.2 state
that the standard 5-lane street section shalt be 72 feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) within 96
feet of right-of-way. This width typically accommodates two travel lanes in each direction, a
continuous center left-turn lane, and bike lanes on a minor arterial and a safety shoulder on a
principal arterial.
ACRD Master Street Map: ACRD Policy Section 3111.1 requires the Master Street Map
(MSM) guide the right-of-way acquisition, arterial street requirements, and specific roadway
features required through development. This segment of Meridian Road is designated in the
MCZC-13-061
MSM as a Towncenter Arterial with 5-lanes and on-street bike lanes, a 65-foot street section
within 96 feet of right-of--way.
c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is not proposing any improvements to Meridian Road,
abutting the site.
d. Staff CommentslRecommendations: Meridian Road is currently under construction as part
of the District's Meridian Split Corridor project; therefore, na roadway improvements or right-
of-way dedication should be required as part of this application.
2. 15t Street
a. Existing Conditions: 1st Street is improved with 2-travel lanes, 36 feet of pavement, curb,
gutter, and 5-foot wide sidewalk abutting the site. 1St Street is improved with vertical curb from
Elm Avenue to 125 feet to the south and with rolled curb from Maple Avenue to 125 feet to the
north. There is 60 feet of right-of-way for 1St Street (30 feet from centeriine}.
b. Policy:
Local Roadway Policy: District Policy 7207.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for
improving all local street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is
taken to all of the adjacent streets.
Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District Policy 7207.5 states that right-of-way
widths for all local streets shall generally not be less than 50-feet wide and that the standard
street section shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). The District will consider the
utilization of a street width less than 36-feet with written fire department approval.
Minor Improvements Policy: District Policy 7203.3 states that minor improvements to
existing streets adjacent to a proposed development may be required. These improvements
are to correct deficiencies or replace deteriorated facilities. Included are sidewaik construction
or replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused
driveways with curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation or reconstruction of pedestrian ramps;
pavement repairs; signs; traffic control devices; and other similar i#ems.
c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is not proposing any improvements to 1st Street,
abutting the site.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: 1st Street is fully-improved; therefore, no additional
street improvements or right-of-way dedication should be required with this application.
The applicant should be required to replace any deteriorated or deficient sidewalk, curb, gutter
or pedestrian facilities along 1st Street abutting the site, consistent with ACHD's Minor
Improvement Policy 7203.3.
3. Alleys
a. Existing Conditions There is a paved public alley ranging within 16 feet of right-of-way
running thru the center of the site.
b. Policy:
Existing Alley Policy: District Policy 7210.2 states that if a proposed development abuts an
existing a-ley, the dedication of additional right-of-way to obtain a minimum width from the
centerline of the alley of 8 feet for residential uses and 10 feet for non-residential or
commercial uses may be required. Each development will be reviewed by the District on a
case-by-case basis. If the proposed development takes access from an alley, the developer
will be required to pave the entire width of the right-of-way from the nearest public street to
and abutting the development.
M CZC-13-061
Alley Parking & Setbacks Policy: District Policy 7210.3.3 states that parking within the alley
right-of--way is prohibited. "No Parking" signs are required to be installed by the developer.
The signs should be located at the alley/street intersections. Parking which is entered from
the alley shall be designed so the minimum clear distance from the back of the parking stall to
the opposite side of the alley is 20 feet for all perpendicular parking.
Setbacks for structures taking access from the alley should be closely coordinated with the
lead land use agency. The setbacks shall either discourage parking within the alley (where it
may partially block or occur within the right-of-way) or allow adequate area for one
perpendicular parking pad. In order to discourage parking, building setbacks shall be minimal
from the alley right-of--way line, while still achieving the required 20 feet of back-up space from
a garage or other parking structure to the opposite side of the alley (i.e. 4-foot setback + 16-
foot alley= 20 feet for back-up space).
c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is not proposing any changes to the alley.
d. Staff CommentslRecommendations: The alley is fully-improved abutting the site; therefore
no additional alley improvements should be required with this application.
4. ~rive~nrays
4.1 1 gf Street
a. Existing Conditions: There are no driveways onto 1St Street from the site.
b. Policy:
Driveway Location Policy: District Policy 7208.4.1 requires driveways located near
intersections to be located a minimum of 75-feet (measured centerline-to-centerline) from the
nearest street intersection,
Successive Driveways: District Policy 7208.4.1 states that successive driveways away from
an intersection shall have no minimum spacing requirements far access points along a local
street, but the District does encourage shared access points where appropriate.
Driveway Width Policy: District Policy 7208.4.3 restricts commercial driveways to a maximum
width of 40-feet. Most commercial driveways will be constructed as curb-cut type facilities.
Driveway Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance
problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District Policy,
7208.4.3, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30 feet
into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway.
c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct a 30-foot wide driveway onto 1St
Street located 125 feet north of Maple Avenue (measured centerline-to-centerline),
d. Staff CommentslRecommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District Driveway Policy
and should be approved, as proposed. The applicant should be required to pave the driveway
its full width and at least 30 feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway.
5. Tree Planfers
Tree Planter Policy: Tree Planter Policy; The District's Tree Planter Policy prohibits all trees in
planters less than 8-feet in width without the installation of root barriers. Class Il trees may be
allowed in planters with a minimum width of 8-feet, and Class I and Class III trees may be allowed
in planters with a minimum width of 10-feet.
6. Landscaping
Landscaping Policy: A license agreement is required for all landscaping proposed within ACHD
right-of-way or easement areas. Trees shall be located no closer than 10-feet from all public
storm drain facilities. Landscaping should be designed to eliminate site obstructions in the vision
M CzC-13-061
triangle at intersections. District Policy 5104.3.1 requires a 40-foot vision triangle and a 3-foot
height restriction on all landscaping located at an uncontrolled intersection and a 50-foot offset
from stop signs. Landscape plans are required with the submittal of civil plans and must meet all
District requirements prior to signature of the final plat and/or approval of the civil plans.
7. ®ther Access
Meridian Road is classified as a principal arterial roadway. Direct lot access is prohibited to this
roadway.
ifia pacific cndifii®ns cf ppr®v~i
1. Construct a 30-foot wide driveway onto 1St Street located 125 feet north of Maple Avenue, as
proposed, Pave the driveway its full width and at least 30 feet into the site beyond the edge of
pavement of the roadway.
2. Correct any deficiencies and/or replace deteriorated facilities abutting the site, including sidewalk
construction or replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; installation or
reconstruction of pedestrian ramps; pavement repairs; signs; traffic control devices; and other
similar items on 1Si Street, abutting the site.
3. Payment of impacts fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit.
~4. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
tar~dard ~®ndifii~ns ®f Appr®vai
1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACRD right-of-way.
2. Private sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within the ACRD right-of-
way.
3. In accordance with District Policy, 7203.3, the applicant may be required to update any
existing non-compliant pedestrian improvements abutting the site to meet current Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The _applicant's engineer should provide
documentation of ADA compliance to District Development Review staff for review.
4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged
during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at
387-6280 (with file number} for details.
5. A license agreement and compliance with the District's Tree Planter policy is required for all
landscaping proposed within ACRD right-of-way or easement areas.
6. All utility relocation cos#s associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall
be borne by the developer.
7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way.
The applicant at no cost to ACRD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant.
The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) a# least two full business
days prior to breaking ground within ACRD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD
Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACRD conduits (spare or fi{led) are
compromised during any phase of construction.
8. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in
writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file
numbers) for details.
9. Ali design and construction shall be in accordance with the ACRD Policy Manual, ISPWC
Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable
MCZC-13-061
ACRD Standards unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of
Idaho shat} prepare and certify all improvement plans.
10. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements of ACRD prior to District approval far occupancy.
11. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shat} be valid unless they are in
writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an
authorized representative at ACHD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain
written confirmation of any change from ACRD.
12. If the site p(an or use should change in the future, ACHD P}arming Review will review the
site plain and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that time.
Amy change in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall
require the applicant to comply with ACHD Policy and Standard Conditions of Approval in
p}ace at that time unless awaiver/variance of the requirements or other legal relief is
granted by the ACHD Commission.
1. The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval
are satisfied.
2. ACRD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system with}n the vicinity impacted by the
proposed development.
. ~~~Chf11~i1'~S
1. Vicinity Map
2. S}te Plan
3. Utility Coordinating Council
4. Development Process Checklist
5. Request for Reconsideration Guidelines
MCZC-13-Q61
MCZC-13-061
ate l~r~
~vbyw.y 7Y ~ es •t
~4T1~ `$.11?If1tlU~
~f~
' O i'~°t~'~
1<~.~ x x.:, -> ..x., .~~itn ~ ~1 ~
iNlcl ~gCR.F/(j '~SIIl7~Q1.~ ~ s ~ ~
ti ~ (`7
q
Y
.
_ ....__........~- ~~.
_ ~...~
,.
.
.
__
- _,......._u....
!
ra w~wit'++ ~ ~ ._
.
.....
.
_
__.
~ l l Y ! k
~~~~~N:~tt
~ 'lh'FF4
.u.-La~~ff'#~~ fiY~. ~ ~~ g}i l d f? Y ~R ~
Y
6K
ia
~
8
1 ~~ `~
`~p'1[;~
' y{
..e,. ~e~'}t~i'. ~~i'a~ { ~y. pJm}v ~ ....
i^~r a~~~~ ~l.
~
~
~
~ ~~ M* ~
}
( r
I
1
~ ~1
~~ Y [~ P 4 B
YYY it i ~ l (®1 @ 4
~c~seEl~~'~~~ ~~ps1~~~ ~ 9
~
~
~ ttt
Y
~~
;
~~
~,~ caLl , ~~ •. --
~ tb}.f~
~ `t7
~~1%G~~ f~~, ~7 , I (
@ ~ gg
~~ g[.
Ba~ g[ygR ~y to 5p {~~t~ ~~ 0 a~ Y~
~ Ad A8 4' P F WR ~~ ~ i Y l~ 9 ~ ~
'1e i I
,,- ~
[i .
1
'\6 ~ ,, : ~ i
~ 1.
tt ~_ ~ ~ ~
gg ~ ~ i
r ~ ~ i )jy/
l
Isr ~.
"`+ .+I~~,
~; «. _..-.~:~,..
~',f;l~i {p s 4 l~~ y
~
~~
~Pj
K
~ 1±~
M
~~
~
~
'
~
t
l~~~~
~~~ ~ `
1
,
i %
- ~ 1 , 1i y
g
gg
y
g
y
r
E
Q
g
p
6
q~~
~
} ~
~(~ ~ ;~
~:
, ~~
\ 3 ~~\S\*~~ ~ / ~ ill
\\ ~-'`i tsi ~ ~ jIl i ....,~
~ r
Y Y^ c5
~ f~l tl!llY~l) 1~>f'I;a .G..{;~H :f"~l}}}[ff
~1 ~ x l a l l l l l 4 , ~^} ~ ~ f4 fF~i ~
{ .
~¢ f~
l
\ti
~ $u:.r
~
l~
v~F<.a
~ G;{5~
" ~ ~ '-~xL.~.r 4 6. :~fS~k ~+i
9~ ~ `7
4 ~~r ~~i ~ ,
~ y i~ ris ~~~ Ej
__
~
~x ~, ~~ g~ p ~fi g f~ l F}• x ~1) 6 X~f ~ t~
A i` ~. PY3 F I ~1 of
'~ ~ ~ 8~ ' ~ x li i ~~- f1
~
~
~ r
;~
~
-~J (t
_°&.
~si'iT//' jl
~ 5
-. ~
F ~~ ~ ~a ire ti~ F ~ ~t ~
_~ 1 l .' "„i ~ 41 ta
~i~-
~
f jy~
F: _.. -yeti ~--. (( ~ l Yj~
~
~ ~' l ~
~ ~.~
.~' ~ i ~1 ~ !~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~ $ t a ! ~~
f
f
+ ~ l
i !
i'i~~ Wi
((~~~ ~
(f`
~ a
-1~
i ~
~111
~l f~ ~ `%~?
~
1 V
~
~
T ~
~ ;! YB a
~
~
• ~ ~! 'j yy
~
f ~ ,~~ ~~ l~V~ ~
{~P r YFp ~
i i k
~
)/ t
~ r
f
;
i S ~
{1{
s~ '1
,jTi' ~.~\{ ~
;Zy,7
~ ~ ` 3~ /Y
f ,`C .-t~~,r`, i- ~ J ~
YI ~ ~ l ~ i I j~
' )~ C~,r
~ ~
(r
~
{
~ ` ay
~ ~ ~~o l Yg~ (~~ f( Ct
1 ~~
1 ~i !7 ~ Yl 2~ ! ~ rY t t~tL{~
.~Y 6~ !f ~~~ Eq ,`t # E~ ~ tf~ r F±~t i ~~1
~~ ~ ~( 66~~ pp i ~ 1 Y! ~~~ Ftl f t;~~ Y
~~ ~' 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ !J ~ f ! l
. ,i ~-' .: ~~,;'~ ~ ,~,~~.1
;,~.,frF# ~- ~_~= s,! ~ l~;~ li
~ st
,,''~ i _
'` !'
~ ~ ,~ ~'zia.
~ ~ l0 - ~ :~ t ;; ,~ t
~x ~~ fig" ~ ~
~t4 ~ i~ i~~ ~~ ~l~ ! ~~~ i~ ~~~~ I! i
!
!e rg ~~1
'~$$ ~D ¢F~ ~
~ ~~
; ~~% ~: lei: ~
£ ~~ ~ ~ E
~ ~~
,~
i~ I
~ "~ 7: ~ ~ ~
y
}
{
t
!~~ si !I i~! ~: 5l) !~ IFY t1 i`tE~ ~G Y.f, .i 1)~ ~ S l ~~
i ~ t
,-^
~1 %~t: I I
~~ I 1
.
-'
s j
' _ f,
-
~
~-.~J~.~.~'.',.~...;.arr ~, . ~ ~y ~~ h ~
(
~qi. i ~
f __ a t
~ w."
, _. ~ ~ ~ f ....
1i;~;1 4 f~ ~ ~ ~~~) ~ ~ ~-~fl ~~ IYr ~~ 1~ ~ +~ ,
it ~ "[~-L.~~~k... ~ L~ _~ ! ~d,-- -~ ^9
IIII
~
1
~
~
-; %~:-
~ ~~
~~ /
---- i
. ~_ _ ~ ,a_-, ~ ;~
Y 5 ~ ~'fa-
~'~~ 1':~ o
., -
~ ~ L~,1
~,::
:r _ : ~ ~ ~ _J~_ I .
~ .~ k ~, ~~I
1. -_
' ~~ t
`ief-. [ '.._1 I.. 'Y~w~1 ;Js ~i#! Ilt, ~ _., ME
~:. ~.
'-
,`
! ~
i=. xel.bK i ~i
~ L
y,~-
i ~_ ~ ~
..,..,a,. _
ft"T `_
p ~ .
- _.___.~..------
_..___ ,... ., _.y
~A..~ ,.. .
__. _ ._ _._.._. ._.. ..._ ._._.._ _. .,:..~.wJ
MCZC-13-061
~4da Courn~y lJfilify ~oorclina~ing ~ouneil
Developer/Local Improvement District
Right of Way Improvements Guideline Request
Purpose: To develop the necessary avenue for proper notification to utilities of local highway
and road improvemenfs, to help the utilities in budgeting and to clarify the already existing process,
1} Notification: Within five (5) working days upon notification of required right of way
improvements by Highway entities, developers shall provide written notification to the affected
utility owners and the Ada County Utility Coordinating Council (UCC). Notification shall include
but not be limifed to, project limits, scope of roadway improvements/project, anticipated
construction dates, and any portions critical to the right of way improvements and coordination
of utilities.
2} Pian Review: The developer shall provide the highway entities and a!I utility owners with
preliminary project plans and schedule a plan review conference. Depending on the scale of
utility improvements, a plan review conference may not be necessary, as determined by the
utility owners. Conference notification shall also be sent to the UCC. During the review meeting
the developer shall notify utilities of the status of right of way/easement acquisition necessary
for their project. At the plan review conference each company shall have the right to appeal,
adjust and/or negotiate with the developer on its own behalf. Each utility sha11 provide the
developer with a letter of review indicating the casts and time required far relocation of its
facilities. Said letter of review is to be provided within thirty calendar days after the date of fhe
plan review conference.
3) Revisions: The developer is responsible to provide utilities with any revisions to preliminary
plans. Utilities may request an updated plan review meeting if revisions are made in the
preliminary plans which affect the utility relocation requirements. Utilities shall have thirty days
after receiving the revisions to review and comment thereon.
4} Final Notification: The developer will provide highway entities, utility owners and the UCC with
final notification of its intent to proceed with right of way improvements and include the
anticipated date work will commence. This notification shall indicate that the work to be
pertormed shall be pursuant to final approved plans by the highway enti#y. The developer shall
schedule a preconstruction meeting prior to right of way improvemenfs. Utility relocation activity
shall be completed within the times established during the preconstruction meeting, unless
otherwise agreed upon.
Notification to the Ada Counfy UCC can be sent to: 50 S. Cole Rd. Boise 83707, or Visit
iducc.com for e-mail notification information.
10 MCZC-13-061
Development Process Checklist
ltems Completed to Date:
®Submi# a development application to a City or to Ada County
®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACRD
®The ACHD Planning Review Section will receive the development application to review
®The Planning Review Section will do one of the following:
^Send a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that (here are no site specific conditions of approval at
this time.
®Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and
evaluating the proposal for its conformance #o District Policy.
^Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system
and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
Items to be completed by .A,pplicant:
^For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" letter:
• The applicant should submit one set of engineered plans directly to ACRD for review by the Development
Review Section for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note; if there are no site improvements
required by ACRD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee assessment.}
• The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACRD) for ANY work in the right-of-
way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts.
^Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval.
D1D YOU REMEMBER:
Construction (Non-Subdivisions)
^ Driveway or Property Approach(s)
• Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to ACRD Construction (for approva! by Development Services & Traffic
Services}. There is a one week turnaround for this approval.
^ Working in the AGIiD Right-of-Way
• Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit
Application" to ACRD Construction -Permits along with:
a} Traffic Control Plan
b) An Erosion & Sediment Contro! Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you
are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt.
Construction (Subdivisions)
^ Sediment & Erosion Submittal
• At least one week prior to setting up aPre-Construction Meeting an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plan,
done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACRD Cons#ruction to be reviewed and approved by the ACRD
Stormwater Section.
^ Idaho Power Company
• Vic Steelman at tdaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being
scheduled.
^ Final Approval from Development Services is required prior to scheduling aPre-Con.
11 M CZC-13-061
Requesf for appeal of staff ®ecision
1. Appeal of staff ®ecision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an
applicant of the final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the
ROWDS Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the
relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted
arbitrarily and capriciously in the Interpretation or enforcement of the ACRD Policy
Manual,
Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to
be charged the applicant far the processing of appeals, to cover
administrative costs.
Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal
with the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten
(10) working days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the
appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed,
identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state
the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary
of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts
and law relied upon and shall include a written argument in support of
the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of appeal that
does not comply with the provisions of this subsection.
Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days
from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of
the appeal, and may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss
the matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision that is
being appealed. A copy of the reply and any modifications to the
decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the
Commission hearing on the appeal.
Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the
hearing of the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission
agenda at a regular meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following
the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's reply to the notice
of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal
and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (~.) week
prior to the hearing,
Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission sha(I either
affirm or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or
supplement the decision being appealed, as such action is adequately
supported by the law and evidence presented at the hearing.
12 MCZC-13-061