Loading...
ApplicationUDIAN E . nvn TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN Mayor Tammy de Weerd City Council Members: Keith Bird Brad Hoaglun Charles Rountree David Zaremba To ensure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Jaycee Holman, City Clerk, by: Transmittal Date: September 23, 2013 Hearing Date: October 17, 2013 File No.: PP 13-028 10 -Oct -13 Request: Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat approval consisting of 55 single family residential building lots and 7 common / other lots on 19 acres of land in an R-4 zoning district for Whitebark Subdivision By: Cindy K. Lewis Trust and T & M Holdings, LLC Location of Property or Project: 2135 E. Amity Road _Joe Marshall (No FP) _Scott Freeman (No FP) _Steven Yearsley (No FP) Michael Rohm (No FP) Macy Miller (No FP) _Tammy de Weerd, Mayor _Charlie Rountree, C/C —Brad Hoaglun, C/C Keith Bird, C/C —David Zaremba C/C —Sanitary Services —Building Department/ Rick Jackson _ Fire Department Police Department City Attorney —Community Development —City Planner _ Parks Department _ Economic Dev, City Engineer Your Concise Remarks: _ Meridian School District (No FP) Meridian Post Office (FP/PP/SHP only) Ada County Highway District _Ada County Development Services _Central District Health _COMPASS (Comp Plan only) —Nampa Meridian Irrig. District _Settlers Irrig. District —Idaho Power Co. (FP,PP,CUP/SHP only) _ QWeSt (FP/PP/SHP only) —Intermountain Gas (FPIPP/SHP only) _ Idaho Transportation Dept. (No FP) _Ada County Ass. Land Records Downtown Projects: —Meridian Development Corp. Historical Preservation Comm. South of RR / SW Meridian: NW Pipeline _ New York Irrigation District _ Boise-Kuna Irrigation District Boise Project Board of Control / Tim Page City Clerk's Office s 33 E. Idaho Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-888-4433 •Fax 208-888-4218 . www.meridiancity.org Planning Division COMMISSION & COUNCIL REVIEW APPLICATION Type of Review Requested (check all that apply) ❑ Alternative Compliance ❑ Annexation and Zoning ❑ Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment ❑ Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Conditional Use Permit Modification Development Agreement Modification ❑ Final Plat ❑ Final Plat Modification ❑ Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat ❑ Private Street ❑ Rezone ❑ Short plat ❑ Time Extension (Commission or Council) ❑ UDC Text Amendment ❑ Vacation (Council) ❑ Variance ❑ Other Information Applicant name: Applicant address: Zip: 3 .? Wt E-mail: Fax: Applicant's interest in property: Nown ❑ Rent ❑ Optioned ❑ Other v" k1,rn tie: Phone:2i 161-� ' Fax: yc ilT,n t( hwner address: f 4 leu` e� f� X51 r,4-(' .. ( Zip: .I 1 E-mail: Agent name (e.g., architect, engineer, developer, representative): U01vt d (1Q Ct5 GN g't� '.ad Firm name: t i i it� � i +"��}t,'rg 6Z AS w.'Y)X, Phone: l`,Dt,1 ""i � 1(' Fax: � > { �1 Address:) Niki {.yxtSer}Of(It 9)ciS,te zip: 71 E-mail: Ca € cci Stir k ''(a►tt e -c.=�, f l Primary contact is: ❑ Applicant ❑ Owner %Agent ❑ Other pp Contact name: �i G'v'v`t°` } g (' me, Phone. r, `''� ' -7 ` Fax: i f i zip: j �a E-mail: �UCr n641 bila`st' aar, Contact address: 1 p Subiect Property Information Location/street address: "7 6 '>;> C Fix)a= F r Assessor's parcel number(s): - Total acres e: Township, range section: ' -r?*' .aj�, RIF r g Current land use `f ( t L t (i ( Current zoning district: c 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org 1 (Rev. 021082013) Project/subdivision name: General description of proposed project/request: 55'> i.r?ri P n '�, Type of use proposed (check all that apply): 7 Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Office ❑ Industrial ❑ Other Who will own & maintain the pressurized irrigation system in this development? New iov <- �fyr :#ibf Which irrigation district does this property lie within? ,EE Primary irrigation source:yvi ttt t' if c; <' '44% Secondary: C Q { Square footage of landscaped areas to be irrigated (if primary or secondary point of connection is City water): +'l Residential Number of residential units: Number of building lots: Number of common lots: S Number of other lots: Proposed member of dwelling units (for multi -family developments only): 1 bedroom: /) 2 — 3 bedrooms: ri/c. 4 or more bedrooms: Yi o - Minimum square footage of stmcturrree�(s) (excl. garage): 1 !/ ` f) Proposed building height: a Minimum property size (s.f)o- f1 tet' Average property size (s.f.): ( ! Gross density (DU/acre-total land): sffi P 4 t Net density (DU/acre-excluding roads & alleys): Percentage of open space provided: �k . Acreage of open space: .2 d f 15 Percentage of qualified open space acreage: I t i1 r/, (See Chapter 3, Article G, for qualified open space) Type of open space provided in acres (i.e., landscaping, public, common, etc): fi r y'r aL r= c, rr yncn , pp Amenities provided with this development (if applicable): /1 i r iW S Type of dwelling(s) proposed: S'Single-family Detached ❑ Single-family Attached ❑ Townhomes ❑ Duplexes ❑ Multi -family ❑ Other Non-residential Pra Number of Gross floor area Hours of operation (days and hours`)~ Percentage of site/project devoted to the Landscaping: ./ Total number of employees: r Total number of parldn aces provided: Authorization Print applicant name: Applicant signature: _ Other lots: ✓ Exis ' if applicable): Building height: ' g: Bui Paving: Number and a students/children (if applicable): Number of compact spaces provided: _ 'vn 2l�i€.uai k, •"�dk' -fi'_ _ Date: _tl 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meddiancity.org 2 (Rev. 02/082073) TALL b1 TIATi. .. CON J U L T I N G Providing Value That SondsAGove The Rest August 29, 2013 City of Meridian Planning and Zoning Department 33 W. Broadway Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Whitebark Subdivision Project Narrative To Whom It May Concern: This letter is to inform the City of Meridian's Planning and Zoning Department that Dave Yorgason with Tall Timber Consulting, LLC is an agent acting on behalf of Cindy K. Lewis Trust and T&M Holdings, LLC that intents to develop the Whitebark Subdivision. The following is a narrative to accompany the applications for this subdivision. In late 2006 and early 2007, this same site was annexed into the City, zoned as R-4 zoning, and the preliminary plat for the Whitebark Subdivision was approved. A development agreement was also signed and recorded at the same time, which includes the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decision & Order for the original Whitebark subdivision. As the preliminary plat has since expired, this application is for a revised preliminary plat and a development agreement modification. We are not requesting a change in the existing R-4 zoning. The application is for a preliminary plat consisting of 55 single-family dwelling units and 7 common lots. As this is an increase in the previous number of lots and we to be develop the site in two phases, we are requesting these changes to the development agreement and a few other related changes, which are outlined later in this narrative. The site is located on the south side of Amity Road, between Eagle Road and Locust Grove Road. Consistent with the previously approved plat, this application takes access off Amity and provides stub streets to the east, south and west for connectivity with future development that is not planned at this time. Page 1 of 4 We are committed to making Whitebark a beautiful neighborhood. With the existing R-4 zone, we are proposing a development with larger homes sites that allow for greater flexibility in design to meet the market needs. We anticipate a variety of single -level and two-story homes. Most homes will have three -car garages. Many of the lots are oversized with greater than average depth that will allow for a more open and spacious feel that will coincide with the surrounding area. Some home buyers may even desire an outbuilding on their lot to accommodate onsite storage of a trailer, boat, camper or other recreational vehicles. Allowing onsite storage of these vehicles and trailers will help keep the neighborhood better organized and clean. The Whitebark Subdivision has over 10 percent open space. As the site design separates the sidewalk from the curb, there is additional open space landscaping located in the area between the sidewalk and curb that was not included in the 10 percent calculation. We did not include this additional landscaping only to show that this site has ample open space and amenity for its residents. In the middle of the neighborhood there will be a one -acre park, which includes a pathway and a children's play area (a.k.a. Tot Lot). We also added another pathway along the middle of a portion of the subdivision as an additional amenity for the residents. This additional pathway further enhances the walkability and livability of the subdivision and adds additional connectivity to the separated sidewalks that also serve as a place of residents to walk and enjoy the community. The Whitebark HOA will have the responsibility to maintain the seven (7) common lots within the subdivision, including the landscape frontage along Amity Road. The HOA will also maintain the landscape islands within the public right-of-way that is internal to the subdivision. Included in this application are color renderings of sample single -level and two-story homes that are anticipated to be similar to homes that will be in Whitebark. These renderings show the anticipated size and style of homes, including the details of the elevations. The colors of the homes are planned to be earth tone and each home will have stone accents and other details to enhance the front elevations. The plan is for each proposed lot to be served with utilities from the City of Meridian, irrigation from the New York Irrigation District, and for the streets to be dedicated to the public, owned and maintained by the Ada County Highway District. All design standards in the application for the Whitebark Subdivision are consistent with the City of Meridian's Uniform Development Code. For clarification, the home sites that back up to the common area along Amity are designed such that they will take access off of a common, or shared, driveway. When we met with City staff, staff suggested the City is considering changing the design standard for common driveways and to have them within a common lot. If the City prefers these common driveways to be in a common lot, we would prefer that as well. The current plan is to develop Whitebark Subdivision in 2 phases. The first phase will be the entry and the portion western half of the home sites. The second phase will be the remaining home sites, or the eastern half of the subdivision. Page 2 of 4 Request to Modify the Existing Development Agreement With the revised preliminary plat, we are requesting changes to the existing development agreement for this site. The original owner and developer for the site is Cindy K. Lewis Trust and is one of applicants for this new application. T & M Holdings, LLC is the other owner/developer applicant. The existing development agreement was entered into on January 2, 2007. The agreement was recorded on January 25, 2007 and the instrument number is 107011191. We are requesting the following changes to the development agreement for the following reasons: 1. Change the total number of building lots from 48 to 55 2. Add another name as Owner/Developer 3. Recognize or acknowledge any changes in conditions of approval that will be associated with the new preliminary plat application. The following are the specific sections in the development agreement that we are requesting to be changed, and the requested changes and/or questions for each section: 1, Parties: 2. Cindy K. Lewis Trust and T&M Holdings, LLC, Owner/Developer 2. THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement"), is made and entered into ........ (change this section to reflect new agreement date, and the OWNER?DEVELOPER to be): Cindy K. Lewis Trust, 2025 E. Chateau Dr., Meridian, Idaho 83646 and T&M Holdings, LLC, 16166 N. 201h Street, Nampa, ID 83687. 3. RECITALS a. 1.7 — (a change needs to be made here to recognize the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order for the application that we are submitting with this requestfor Development Agreement Modification. Not certain if the existing dates and references to the old approval should be replaced with the new references, or if the new references should be added to these references. We look to the City's guidance as to the best way to capture the conditions of approval for the new preliminary plat.) 4. Section 3.2 OWNER/DEVELOPER: means and refers to Cindy K. Lewis whose address is 2025 E. Chateau Dr., Meridian, Idaho 83646 and T&M Holdings, LLC whose address is 16166 N. 201h Street, Nampa, Idaho 83687, the party developing said Property and shall include any subsequent developer(s) or owners of the Property. 5. Section 4.1 -USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: Construction and development of 48 55 single-family building lots and 7 common lots on 19 acres in the pFeyesed R-4 zone pertinent to this AZ 06-044 application (should also add the number associated with this accompanying preliminary plat application Page 3 of 4 6. Section 5.1.6 —Conditions Governing Development of Subject Property. That a maximum of 48 55 units will be constructed on this site. 7. Section 14— Certificate of Occupancy (Question: Should a statement be added to recognize that this will be developed into more than one phase? if so, agree to comply with this section on a phased basis.) 8. Section 16— Notices (Add name and contact info for T&M Holdings, LLC as an additional contact) T & M Holdings, LLC 16116 N. 201h Street Nampa, Idaho 83687 9. (Add another signature line under Acknowledgments for T& M Holdings, LLC as Owner/Developer.) 10. (Question: Do we replace the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision & Order, including the Exhibit 8, which state the conditions of approval for the preliminary plat, in the existing Development Agreement with the new Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision & Order and/or the Exhibit a stating the conditions of approval of the new preliminary plat? We look to the City's guidance as to the best way to capture the conditions of approval for the new preliminary plat.) We are pleased to bring these applications for Development Agreement Modification and a Preliminary plat for Whitebark Subdivision to the City of Meridian for consideration and approval. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, Dave Yorgason, President Tall Timber Consulting, LLC Page 4 of 4 AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST STATE OF IDAHO ) 1 COUNTY OF ADA ) (city) being fust duly sworn upon, oath, depose and say: (address) (state) --- 1. That I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant my permission to: (name) (address) s to submit the accompanying application(s) pertaining to that property. 2. I agree to indemnify, defend and hold the City of Meridian and its employees harmless from any claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements contained herein or as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application. 3. I hereby grant permission to City of Meridian staff to enter the subject property for the purpose of site inspections related to processing -�}}` said application(s). Dated this � � ),� day of � f 7 (.E�` . 20 (Signature) SWORN to before me the day and year first above iwq My Commission Expires:q% 2 616 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102 + Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 a Website: www.merldiancity.org AF FIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST STATE or MAHO COUNTY OF ADA i (name) (city) being first duly sworn upon, oath, depose and say: Cq Sip (address) (state) 1. That I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant my pemrission to: i�C°tK' �OJi hlr,n 6J+ `���1 `I 1lft�k�t �vnlut�t-.i �d7 t� i�l (name) (address) to subntit the accompanying application(s) pertaining to that property. 2. I agree to indemnify, defend and hold the City of Meridian and its employees harmless from any claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements contained herein or as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application. 3. I hereby grant permission to City of Meridian staff to enter the subject property for the purpose of site inspections related to processing said application(s). Dated this a� _day SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year fust above written. (Not# Publi m o) > r d) "� Residing at: "moo, ll, �� fi" �� rr �1 t7, My Commission Expires: i ® �? � to p �a 'a.• 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 a o'• e a � Aione: (208) 884-5533 a Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 a Website: www.meridiancity.org VICINITY MAP -NTS- '.G: OWNER/DEVELOPER T&M HOLDINGS, LLC 16166 N. 20TH STREET NAMPA, ID 83687 208-461-1234 •1► CINDY K LEWIS TRUST 9754 W. MILCIAY RD BOISE, ID 83704 WHITEBARK SUBDIVISION VICINITY MAP w J c E. AMITY ROAD ui TALL TIMBER CONSULTING CK -ENGINEERING DAVE YORGASON CHAD KINKELA 14254 W. BATTENBURG DR, 860 HEADWATERS DR. BOISE, ID 83712 EAGLE, ID 83616 208-850-1070 208-869-0590 CHECKED BY: CSK DATE: 08/26/13 FILE: WHRE&1RK PRE -PIAT. WG ENGINEERINGCK 860 HEADWATERS DR. EAGLE, ID 83616 PHONE 208-869-0590 CITY OF MERIDIAN PRE -APPLICATION MEETING NOTES Mo`m Project/Subdivision Name:_ Ai IP ha r K� Date: �4ZS1 /5 City Staff: J _ Location: Uz135 2� fy /# Si/3zZ l2c oo Comprehensive Plan Future Land Usd Map Designation: L -D P`_ Size of Property: 1-7.M Design Guidelines Development Context: Proposed Use: Proposed Zoning: — Existing Use: Existing Zoning: P� '- Surrounding Uses: Street Buffer(s) and/or Land Use Buffer(s): 'e-Joi Grier' Open Space/Amenities/Pathways:(�o my -use kijVwecV I M,. proms �e c� m . o� /D fo &t Bat "-0) II&rneh iy Access/Stub Streets/StreetSystedt: 022kl e .ry lr ar l; �x� nro�erfi�J Sewer & Water Service: Topography/Hydrology/Floodplain Issues: History:_ R7_-o1,-c?yy1.�DA#io7o/l44pfred Additional Meeting Notes: -k Mog i 0A dv �_u6w bo b1d�. /oa5-eurr�r y Iw r�Jfn'cyP � /d Ply 2 ,>eGmld�rtl en e�9enC' nCCPJ.f /CL�r Tw,.IJ-f over b4- lo7t ) /11 Note: A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) will be required by ACifD for large commercial projects and any residential development with over 100 units. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact & transmit the TIS to ACHD. To avoid unnecessary delays & expedite the hearing process, applicants are encouraged to submit the TIS to ACHD prior to submitting their application to the City. Not having ACHD comments and/or conditions on large projects may delay hearing(s) of the City. Please contact Mindy Wallace at 387-6178 or Christy Little at 387-6144 at ACHD to determine if a TIS is required or for any questions in regard to ACHD conditions, Impact fees and process. her Agencies/Departments to Contact: Ada County Highway District Idaho Transportation Department Notes: 1) Applicants are required to hold a neighborhood meeting in accord with UDC 11 -5A -5C prior to submittal of an application requiring a public hearing (except for a vacation or short plat); and 2) All applicants for permits requiring a public hearing shall post the site with a public hearing notice in accord with UDC 11 -5A -5D.3 (except for UDC text amendments, Comp Plan text amendments, and vacations). The information provided during this meeting is based on current UDC requirements and the Comprehensive Plan. Any subsequent changes to the UDC and/or Comp Plan may affect your submittal and/or application. This pre -application meeting shall be valid for four (4) months. El Nampa Meridian Irrigation District El Public Works Department p p ❑ Settler's Irrigation District ❑ Building Department ❑ Sanitary Services Company ❑ Police Department ❑ Parks Department ❑ Central District Health Department ❑ Fire Department ❑ Other: Applications) Required: ❑ Administrative Design Review ❑ Conditional Use Permit Modification/Transfer ❑ Rezone ❑ Alternative Compliance [ Development Agreement Modification ❑ Short Plat ❑ Annexation ❑ Final Plat 15C)'C7 ❑ Time Extension - Council ❑ City Council Review ❑ Final Plat Modification ❑ UDC Text Amendment ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Map ❑ Planned Unit Development ❑ Vacation ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Text Preliminary Plat ❑ Variance ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Private Street ❑ Other Notes: 1) Applicants are required to hold a neighborhood meeting in accord with UDC 11 -5A -5C prior to submittal of an application requiring a public hearing (except for a vacation or short plat); and 2) All applicants for permits requiring a public hearing shall post the site with a public hearing notice in accord with UDC 11 -5A -5D.3 (except for UDC text amendments, Comp Plan text amendments, and vacations). The information provided during this meeting is based on current UDC requirements and the Comprehensive Plan. Any subsequent changes to the UDC and/or Comp Plan may affect your submittal and/or application. This pre -application meeting shall be valid for four (4) months. ME kms• CCD ar v1 w CA 6 rt C. � C 0 mCD' c z ... ( o C,CD O �0rt rtO.Q �1 W N N w V m A W N N . . . . . . . .CL � J _• N e cb z (D 7 � 9 m ww fD v I s rD t r r w e z 3 C N'®CA) vm kms• CCD ar v1 w CA 6 rt C. � C 0 mCD' c z ... ( o C,CD O �0rt rtO.Q �1 June 20, 2013 Re: Neighborhood Meeting request for Whitebark Subdivision in Meridian, Idaho. Dear neighbor, We invite you to attend a neighborhood meeting to discuss an application for Whitebark subdivision. The site was previously annexed and rezoned to R-4 zone with a preliminary plat. As the preliminary plat has since expired, this application is for a new preliminary plat. The property is located on the south side of Amity Road between Eagle Road and Locust Grove Road in Meridian, Idaho (see attached map). The neighborhood meeting will be held on site at 2135 E. Amity, Meridian, Idaho, on June 27, 2013 at 7:00 pm. The purpose of this meeting is to review the proposed project and give the surrounding neighbors an opportunity to ask questions and express their concerns or support. If you are unable to attend and would like additional information, or if you have any additional questions, I can be reached at: dyorgason6@gmail.com or 208-850-1070. We hope you are able to attend. Sincerely, Dave Yorgason, applicant's representative Tall Timber Consulting, LLC o�� NN Veto noa�;snaoa,�S Or m 4 pj ZZ 9 ops r M7�7' a Er MFO 1Vi ryp W W o�- 3 Aom r= a,er s .'9 <m v „'p"', x k 96 Ig HOW AN4 # ,�. i y '+_ Oxy a I s o.•, -k i y all, � � _ `+`'�"..y ht xy+g �� +ice ��'_� r r� t �.� T�`.� t `•' �r. teat s.?f3 �, i t x afi„u Tt � � 2 e � N a� #m�N � y`"�,��af{��Yg'z+' ��' z A� 2M` he by HIM ❑ ak'k 'k i zap Stn mto c� n b n m m N s �vv0 3 Q Amo g 3 &�A@A 'w Qui S T, m oa a �zc�i�2� n 3 Qi m N Z m� D n ZR � y a � ' S. sLa S 0 3 m m m o N o Q N Per Unified Development Code (UDC) 11 -5A -5D, the applicant for all applications requiring a public hearing (except for a UDC text amendment, a Comprehensive Plan text amendment and/or vacations) shall post the subject property not less than ten (10) days prior to the hearing. The applicant shall post a copy of the public hearing notice of the application(s) on the property under consideration. The applicant shall submit proof of property posting in the form of a notarized statement and a photograph of the posting to the City no later than seven (7) days prior to the public hearing attesting to where and when the sign(s) were posted. Unless such Certificate is received by the required date, the hearing will be continued. The sign(s) shall be removed no later than three (3) days after the end of the public hearing for which the sign(s) had been posted. I am aware of the above requirements and will comply with the posting requirements as stated in UDC 11-5A-5. x."L.v :i ,',;'.. Applicant/agent signator) 1\ Date > C, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 102 ® Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 + Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridimcity.org Community Development M Date: 8/20/13 Verification Meridian City Hall, Suite 102 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 208.887.2211 The address information below has been researched and verified as correct by the City of Meridian Community Development Department. Project Name: Whitebark Address: 2135 E. Amity Rd. Parcel Number: 51132212600 Zip Code Acres: Property Owner: e Address Verification Rev: 04/23/12 �s r IDAHO SURVEY GROUP Project No. 07-041 Proposed Whitebark Subdivision 1450 East Watertower St. Suite 130 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone (208) 846-8570 Fax (208) 884-5399 August 30, 2013 A portion of the East 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 32, T.3N., ME., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 32, from which the North 1/4 corner of said Section 32 bears South 89'43'50" East, 2645.04 feet; Thence along the North boundary line of said Section 32 South 89°43'50" East, 1983.82 feet to the Northwest corner of the East 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of said Section 32, said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence continuing along said North boundary line South 89°43'50" East, 500.72 feet; Thence leaving said North boundary line South 00°18'40" West, 356.50 feet; Thence South 89'43'50" East, 160.50 feet to a point on the North-South centerline of said Section 32; Thence along said North-South centerline South 00°18'40" West, 980.66 feet to the C -N 1/16 corner lying on the North boundary of Blackrock Subdivision No. 1, as same is recorded in Book 96 of Plats at Page 12003, records of Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the North boundary of said subdivision North 89044145" West, 661.99 feet to the Southwest corner of the East 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of said Section 32; Thence along the West boundary line of the East 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of said Section 32 North 00°20'39" East, 1337.34 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 19.00 acres, more or less. Prepared By: Idaho Survey Group, P.C. ADA COUNTY RECORDER J. DAVID NAVARRO AMOUNT 9,00 SON IDAHO 11111105 01:23 AM REc ADE® "REDDDEsr'OF III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III Susan M. Graham 105171320 This Corrected Warranty Deed is to correct the Warranty Deed recorded as Instrument No, 105067187 for the purpose of removing Parcels I and 5 from the property descriptions included in that deed, For no consideration, CINDY K. LEWIS, a single person, as the Grantor does hereby grant, release, and convey unto "CINDY K. LEWIS, Trustee of the CINDY K. LEWIS TRUST, U/T/A dated the 18th day of May 2005" as the Grantee, whose current address is 9754 Milclay, Boise, Idaho 83704, the following described premises, in ADA County, Idaho, to -wit: See Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set forth in full. together with their appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises, with their appurtenances unto the said Grantee, heirs and assigns forever. And the said Grantor does hereby covenant to and with the said Grantee, that she is the owner in fee simple of said premises; that they are free from Incumbrances and that she will warrant and defend the same from all lawful claims whatsoever. NOTE: THIS DEED IS DONE WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE SEARCH. DATED this day of November 2005. .tit,►:, STATE OF IDAHO ) ss. County of Ada ) On this 0,1 day of November 2005, before me, a notary public in and for said State, personally appeared CINDY K. LEWIS, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument,.,, 1"Aftno*ledged to me that she executed the same. IyOTARY Notary Public fn and for Idaho PUBLIC Residing at Boise, Idaho. _._. __..:' My commission expires:4/1/2009. Client No: EXHIBIT "A" Parcel 1: Lot 5 in Block 2 of Pennsylvania Square Subdivision, according to the official plat thereof, filed i Book 37 of Plats at Pages 3108 and 3109, Records of Ada County, Idaho Parcel 2: Lot 2 of Wyoming Estates Subdivision, according to the plat thereof filed in Book 40 of Plats pages 3327 and 3328, Records of Ada County, Idaho, Parcel 3: Lot 1 of Wyoming Estates Subdivision, according to the plat thereof filed in Book 40 of Plats at Pages 3327 and 3328, Records of Ada County, Idaho. Parcel 4: Lot 2 in Block 1 of HARRISBURG PLACE SUBDIVISION, according to the official plat thereof, filed in Book 62 of Plats at Pages 6166-6167, Records of Ada County, Idaho. Parc?.l : An undivided one-half interest in and to the following: A PMUM of the Noriheast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 32, Township 3 North, 1 East Boise Meridian, Ada county, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: at OR North quarter comer of said Section 32, thence South 89°45" West, along the Natlhejly boundary of sakl Northeast quarter of the NOW~ quarter, 160.50 feet to a point said point being the REAP. POINT OF OEGMNING, thence continuing South 89°47 West along the Northerly uarter, 5W.S7 fed to a point being luau known of record as Northwest owner of the East 0 Acres of the saki Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter; thence South 0°IS' Eat along the West boundary of the formerty known of record W 20 Aches of the said Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter, 1320 feet more or less, to a point on the South boundary of said Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter, thence North 89MY East along the Soiffloty boundary of said Northeast quarter of the Northwest quart, 661.70 feet, more or less, to a point being the Southeast corner of said Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter; thence North 0015' West along the' Easterly boundary of saki Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter, 963.50 feet, more ar less, to a point lying South 00151 Wast 356.50 feet from the North quarter earner of said Section 32; then= South 89°45' West parallel to the North boundary of said Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter, 160.50 feet to a point; dance North 0°15' West 356.50 feet to a point being the REAL POiNT OF BEGINNING. Re-record to correct a missing call in the legal description. ELEOTRONICALLY RECORD60 - DO NOT REMOVE THE COUNTY STAMPED FIRST PAGE AS R IS NOW INCORPORATED AS PART OF THE ORIGINALOOCUMENT. ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich AMOUNT 13.00 2 BOISE IDAHO 02/26/2013 12:29 PM DEPUTY Victoria Bailey D Elc Eg RECORDED -REQUEST OF I IIIIII IIII IIII 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIII 1111 1111 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE AND ESCRO 113020978 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Christopher D. Rich AMOUNT 13.01) 2 BOISE IDAHO 02/20/2013 02:22 PM DEPUTY Lisa Irby RWOR J!tMRKQUUTO"g I(111111l111111lIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIII!lNllllnllllllllll RECORDED -REQUEST OF 'FIRST AMERICAN TITLE AND ESCRO 113018960 -l�4— / 9.7 9 (a 9I Jg WARRANTY DIEED FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Kerry C. Frisch) as Successor trustee of the Marvin C. Frisch Revocable Trust, dated February 27,1997, as to an undivided 1/2interest (°Grantor"), does hereby . grant, bargain, sell and convey unto T&M Holdings LLC, an Idaho limited liability company, as to an undivided '% interest ("Grantee") whose current address is 16166 N. 20th St., Nampa, Idaho 83687, the following described premises, to -wit: See Exhibit "A9l attached hereto. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said promises, with their appurtenances unto the said Grantee, its heirs and assigns forever. And the Grantor does hereby covenant to and with the said Grantee, that it is the owner in fee simple of said premises; that said premises are free from all encumbrances, EXCEPT those to which this conveyance is expressly made subject and those made, suffered, or done by the Grantee; and 'subject to reservations, restrictions, dedications, easements, rights-of-way of record or visible on the. premises and general taxes and assessments for the current year, and that it will warrant and defend the same frbm all lawful claims whatsoever. DATED this day of� 2013. Marvin C. Frisch Revocable Trust, dated February 27, 1997 By Kerry C.Ftiso i Trustee STATE OF IDAHO ) ss. County of Ada ) On this�ay of February, 2013, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Keay C, Frisch, known and.idenilified to me to be the Trustee of the Marvin C, Frisch Revocable Trust, dated February 27, 1997, that executed the instrument or the person who executed the instrument on behalf of said Trust, and acknowledged to me that such Trust executed the some. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written, PATTY 1. CHUPP Notary bli r Idaho (SE TARY PUBLIC Residing aO� Idaho STATE OF IDAHO Commission expires:, An undivided one-half interest in and to tho following: North,Township 3 ae „- Ado County$ Idaho, a. ` �' �t e - }• ger ;�. S y s A @f sF EXCEPIrING therefrom the right-of-way for Amity Road along the Norah boundary` *Northwest. quarter, 160.50 Peet to a point ALSO EXCEPTING therefrom all ditch ZoTroad right-of-way. aaa�iYN ly1V1[Islei�'' �'� `96171DA110..000N7w�s1'(A>?s�aM _ * d hrisiaWrcr D. Ricb`Reca"r'11'0'. r W. •JO le�ig¢Y�eplfyhe AniRxtaf0 u. mildPp00rs onrc d A 1• �. s QfAd. Cbug1y. 510 WITNESSW I llnvi se wyxeJ my 0fficiai Ji1r 11'd 111 '1 ' - Dave m eson Prom: Jerry Hastings <jhastings@adaweb.net> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 12:07 PM To: Dave Yorgason Subject: Whitebark Sub Name Reservation Flag Status: Flagged August 14, 2013 Dave Yorgason Tall Timber Consulting RE: Subdivision Name Reservation: "Whitebark Subdivision" Dear Dave, At your request, I have reserved the name "Whitebark Subdivision" for your project. I can honor this reservation only as long as your project is in the approval process. Final approval can only take place when the final plat is recorded. This reservation is available for the next ten (10) years unless the project is terminated by the client or the jurisdiction or the conditions of approval have not been met. In which case the name can be re -used by someone else. Sincerely, Jeri v 1 ,iirp 8, I"'_i_ Ada { ,u rlv, f,Jlo 208 ',! ;,,9k) 208-28,' h :g�q@adaweb.net From: Dave Yorgason(mailto;dyr)rgason6CRgmail_corrt] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 4:40 PM To: Jerry Hastings Subject: Whitebark sub name Hi Jerry, I looked into your system and did not see the subdivision name Whitebark as an approved name. I am working with some clients on a 18 acre parcel on the South side of Amity Road between Eagle Rd and Locust Grove and the site was previously approved as Whitebark. We are now getting ready to re -submit a new preliminary plat application and what to use the name Whitebark Subdivision. Can you confirm this is approved and reserved for us? Thanks, Dave Yorgason I in 1. Mo M d q / - � � �.J \NQ•l 10h.®yavf_ i Ti»q 0. aXl/16 emf6fi N gg �e&ggg�g9 gRlip 9 I% g `H ai$5 �� -s oil i f° z � � 8 �. Ng. € §H➢ aR5 � g8 g R g gg 5p 6�€ g ®® I s n �5 6$ gR B&iR1 6 R [[yy a 6 i- Tti �" jt Ip.m ,R g LI H3 v n �a�9 CKEENG/NEERING O ^ WHITEBARK SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT SECTION 32, T.3N., RJE., B.M. MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO fi4e� ro a m C > r� �zwz � z NO A A §➢AS5 j i y N—Zy c 1O� fti W. G I in 1. Mo M d q / - � � �.J \NQ•l 10h.®yavf_ i Ti»q 0. aXl/16 emf6fi N gg �e&ggg�g9 gRlip 9 I% g `H ai$5 �� -s oil i f° z � � 8 �. Ng. € §H➢ aR5 � g8 g R g gg 5p 6�€ g ®® I s n �5 6$ gR B&iR1 6 R [[yy a 6 i- Tti �" jt Ip.m ,R g LI H3 v n �a�9 CKEENG/NEERING O ^ WHITEBARK SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT SECTION 32, T.3N., RJE., B.M. MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 0 r D Z s O®vvvvvv sass T•mvvv7�vmvvTvsvvavv mvv®� 1 0 0 0 ° °1 1 f', Oio iol mi° Im a mi°im iml�,m del f9 1 I I i i i� •mu 1 i� G€ Mio 1 i ��mm mmm mmvvi®mmm mmmmmimvmm ®mama®� CO) CD God In ` R� Ze�1tl Dr��i�p�i �B.e�lr WHITNABH SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN IDAHO All m I m m 1�GyI 1€1 m 2'ir- L_ - fivlkptl.� I� _ L o W i I In ` R� Ze�1tl Dr��i�p�i �B.e�lr WHITNABH SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN IDAHO All ey ,'n �rtozwt, rn YW vwavw � um mm nr uu� en.nw 001 v _ L nm �m "o� X Q�N 2'ir- I In ` R� Ze�1tl Dr��i�p�i �B.e�lr WHITNABH SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN IDAHO om- ey ,'n �rtozwt, rn YW vwavw � um mm nr uu� en.nw 001 v _ L nm 2'ir- L_ - fivlkptl.� I� _ 5 g 8 I 'f_ 6t] I `�Yl '� In ` R� Ze�1tl Dr��i�p�i �B.e�lr WHITNABH SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN IDAHO ey ,'n �rtozwt, rn YW vwavw � um mm nr uu� en.nw t6S• % 9 f tea+• I I m Q � Nr mti PALL � WHITEBARK SUBDIVISION a' z mR q� G 6 06 tl dFpj me F ! Gic Y i ee4 aC p 0 __ ., m� mp ro Z j $ i i 1 RER I I m Q � ' PALL � WHITEBARK SUBDIVISION a' --.a--_ c°{ mR q� G 6 06 � ee4 aC waive"µ'o mu runeiiiz10i m� mp = " I LANI7b`QiAPg'' PLANaOT ' WHITEBARK SUBDIVISION a' --.a--_ c°{ 6 MERIDIAN IDAHO waive"µ'o mu runeiiiz10i i LANDSCAPE PLAN WHITEBARK SUBDIVI3IOPI Aeoae`m"wo MRRH)IAN IDAHO t_-� wv ru °irwe� ei i n' b ya�.�F �+• Jim z y r �• N O _. ® O �1,3.0 oN�qg t4 m tl p� c 'o 9 N Z d to 1I�OlB �0 r H Y .—ei' y yyV9311 i I i I m z I o iso t8 �' o � I o Q I ca = i I i I m z I o iso I I I I I I Q I c t8 �' o � I o I I I I I I Q I c t8 �' ARK BVBDIVISION MERIDIAN IOAAO MERIDIAN w.owuc.wanrcrvre vc $ wzcvwe�erc. ux�emrese F' ease axa mm ru uw uaeeer `ear. H 0 bd Z uH 9�r tjzxr 0 �o p9 ®O® -d rACV h N f11 to t"ra O 5d r z m �gg 0 ¢a, yRtlI4 c 14 > e 9 R O z a m n � v t'i g LANDSCAPE P%�Iv _. _ WHITEBABK SUBDIVISION SA�,aI Gn� CMHIRRIZAN IDAHO EtlW MM la li.il she-P)n From: Mindy Wallace <Mwallace@achdidaho.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 7:22 AM To: Dave Yorgason Subject: RE: Whitebark Dave, A traffic impact study is not required for this application. Please let me know if you have any other questions. Mindy Mindy Wallace Planning Review Supervisor Ada County Highway District (208)387-6178 "We drive quality transportation for all Ada County -- Anytime ... Anywhere!" From: Dave Yorgason [ma:ltc?:dygtgAson6 c gmail,com] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 4:15 PM To: Mindy Wallace Cc: Dave Yorgason Subject: Whitebark Mindy, We are getting ready to submit an application with the City of Meridian for a revised preliminary plat for Whitebark subdivision. This about 18 acres and is located on the South side of Amity between Eagle Road and Locust Grove. This was approved by ACHD a few years ago, but since preliminary plat expired we are going back to the City to renew the plat. Our design is for 55 buildable lots. Will we need to do a traffic impact study for this development? Thanks, Dave Yoragson AY91 oqo September 8, 2006 File: HUBHOM B06167A Mr. Justin Blackstock Hubble Homes, Inc. 701 South Allen Street, Ste 104 Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: LETTER REPORT Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Blackrock Subdivision Eagle Road and Amity Road Meridian, Idaho Dear Mr. Blackstock: STRATA, Inc. is pleased to present our authorized limited geotechnical engineering evaluation to assist yourself and Bailey Engineering, Inc. to help characterize soil and groundwater conditions at the proposed Blackrock subdivision to be located south and west of the intersection of Amity Road and Eagle Road in Meridian, Idaho. Specifically, we understand the design team is evaluating the subject site relative to subsurface stormwater disposal and groundwater conditions for the subdivision. At this time, our evaluation is limited to providing recommendations for infrastructure development and does not include recommendations for individual lot development. The following letter report presents the results of our field exploration performed to date, and our subsequent geotechnical and hydrogeologic recommendations. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING We understand you plan to develop approximately 242 acres located south and west of the intersection of Amity and Eagle Roads as a residential subdivision. An undetermined number of residential lots are anticipated with associated infrastructure, including streets, utilities, and stormwater disposal facilities. We understand that significant grading may be performed in the southwestern portion of the site, however, at this time no grading plans have been developed. Based on our discussions with Mr. David Bailey of Bailey Engineering, Inc., we understand that stormwater will be retained on-site by subsurface infiltration beds, or drainage swales. Additionally, we understand that significant grading may be performed in the western portions of the site. However, at the time of this report, grading plans have not been developed. Therefore, this report does not include any recommendations for fill placement or other lot grading recommendations. SITE DESCRIPTION The site consists of approximately 242 acres of relatively flat to moderately sloping terrain. The property is bounded on the north by east Amity Road and agricultural/rural residential development, on the east by Eagle Road and Ten -Mile Creek, and on the south and west sides by agricultural and rural residential development. Ten -Mile Creek flows from the IDAHO MONTANA NEVADA OREGON UTAH WASHINGTON WYOMING www.stratageotech.com 8653 W. Hackamore Dr. Boise, Idaho 83709 P.208.376.8200 F.208.376.8201 Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Blackrock Subdivision File: HUBHOM B06167A Page 2 southeast to northwest and forms a portion of the eastern project boundary. Presently, agricultural activities are on-going throughout the majority of the site with irrigated turf grass present in the majority of the southern and central portions of the parcel. The northern portion of the parcel is presently not being utilized for agricultural purposes. In addition, an existing roadway and subdivision development is on-going on the southwestern portion of the overall development area. STRATA has previously performed a geotechnical engineering evaluation, entitled Report Geotechncia! Evaluation, Proposed Blackrock Subdivision No. 1, Meridian, Idaho, dated February 11, 2005. As noted, the site is moderately sloping to relatively flat and slopes from southwest to northeast with approximately 80 feet of topographic change across the parcel. Based on review of existing topography provided by Bailey Engineering, slopes were estimated to be as steep as approximately 5 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical (5H:IW with steepest slopes present in the southwestern portion of the parcel. Single-family residential structures and associated out -buildings are present fronting Amity Road and Eagle Road, however, they are not included as part of the present project. FIELD EXPLORATION STRATA observed the excavation of 14 test pits on August 8, 2006. Additionally, 16 test pits were advanced across a portion of the site in January, 2005 as part of the previous investigation performed by STRATA. Test pits were excavated to depths of 7 to approximately 12 feet terminating within native granular sediments, or below ground water. Standpipe piezometers were installed in all test pits to allow for continued monitoring of groundwater levels. Approximate test pit locations are provided on Plate 1, Site Plan. Our field engineer visually evaluated the soils encountered referencing the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). A brief explanation of the USCS is presented on Plate 2 and should be used to interpret the terms used on the test pit logs. Test pit logs are included in Appendix A. Select soils were retained for laboratory testing and for classification purposes. At the conclusion of our subsurface evaluation, test pits were loosely backfilled level with the existing ground surface. Test pit locations are documented by the presence of labeled stakes and/or standpipe piezometers. If test pits are located beneath proposed building, pavement, or sidewalk areas, we recommend they be re -excavated to sufficient depth to expose native soil and backfilled with structural fill. SITE GEOLOGY As part of our scope of service, STRATA has reviewed the Geologic Map of the Boise Valley and Adjoining Area, Western Snake River Plain, Idaho. Review of the referenced geologic map indicates that the site has been mapped as sandy alluvium of side -stream valleys and gulches as well as gravel of the Amity Terrace. Amity Terrace gravels are mapped in the western, topographically elevated, portion of the site, with sandy alluvium associated with Ten Mile Creek mapped in the central and eastern, relatively low portions of the site. IDAHO MONTANA NEVADA OREGON UTAH WASHINGTON WYOMING www.stratageotech.com Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Blackrock Subdivision File: HUBHOM B06167A Page 3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Soils encountered within the test pits generally consist of near surface silt and clay overlying silty sand grading to poorly -graded sand and poorly -graded gravel. Vegetation and organics were typically observed within the upper 6 inches of the soil profile. We observed near surface clay and silt to be brown, stiff to hard, and moist, with varying sand content. These soils were not encountered in all test pit locations, however, were noted to extend to depths of approximately 2 to 6 feet where encountered. Underlying clay and silt, where present, tan to brown, medium dense to dense, moist to saturated, silty sand, poorly -graded sand and poorly -graded gravel was encountered. These granular sediments typically become more coarse grained with depth and are noted to extend beyond the termination depths of all explorations. We did not observe gravel in all test pit excavations, however all test pits terminated within poorly -graded sand, silty sand or gravel. Sandy -silt fill material was observed in the vicinity of TP -9, extending to a depth of approximately 4 feet below the existing grade. Fill material exhibited significant organic material including grass clippings associated with the existing turf pile. Based on review of well driller's logs in the area, gravel and sand may extend to depths in excess of 50 feet below existing ground surface. Specific soil contacts and descriptions can be referenced on individual test pit logs in Appendix A. Groundwater was encountered at depths as shallow as approximately 3 to 4 feet below existing grade in the vicinity of Ten -Mile Creek, with groundwater increasing in depth to the west, away from Ten -Mile Creek. Groundwater was not encountered in all test pit locations. Groundwater levels in the vicinity of the project are related to seasonal irrigation and canal leakage in the areas, and are likely near the maximum elevation during the irrigation season. Estimation of seasonal -high groundwater is difficult without long-term monitoring, however STRATA performed groundwater monitoring on August 28th. This monitoring indicates shallow groundwater present in areas fronting Ten -Mile Creek, with groundwater levels observed to be as shallow as 2.9 feet. Groundwater monitoring results are attached as Plate 3 to this report. As requested, STRATA is performing monthly groundwater monitoring of piezometers installed across the site. STRATA will provide the results of monthly groundwater monitoring to Mr. David Bailey of Bailey Engineering. SOIL SURVEY REVIEW A review of the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Ada County Area, Idaho, indicates that soil types across the site consist of Abo silt loam, Aeric Haplaquepts, Oliga Variant loam, Power silt loam, and Purdam silt loam. Specific soil characteristics, as defined by the USDA, are presented in the following sections. Abo Silt Loam and Oliga Variant Loam: Abo silt loam and Oliga Variant loam is mapped in a portion of the north and central portion of the parcel. These soils exhibit moderate to moderately slow permeability, with slow runoff and slight hazard of erosion. Groundwater may be as shallow as 3 to 5 feet below ground surface during the irrigation season. Additionally, these soils may exhibit low strength and moderate to high frost action potential. IDAHO MONTANA NEVADA OREGON UTAH WASHINGTON WYOMING www.stratageatech.com Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Blackrock Subdivision File: HUBHOM B06167A Page 4 Aeric Haplaquepts: Aeric Haplaquepts soils are mapped in the portions of the site near Ten Mile Creek. Specific soils characteristics, as defined by the USDA, for this soil type include moderately slow to very slow permeability, very slow runoff, and slight hazard of erosion. Groundwater may be as shallow as 18 to 36 inches during the irrigation season. Aeric Haplaquepts soils typically exhibit moderate to high frost action potential. Purdam and Power Silt Loam: Purdam and Power silt loam soils are mapped by the USDA in the western and southern portions of the parcel. Characteristics of these soils, as defined by the USDA include moderately slow permeability, medium runoff, and moderate erosion hazard. Additionally, these soils may exhibit low strength, frost action potential, and high shrink -swell potential. LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory testing was performed on select soil samples obtained from our field exploration. Laboratory testing was accomplished referencing ASTM test procedures. Laboratory testing included grain -size analysis and Atterberg limits testing for soil classification and R -value testing for roadway design. Index laboratory test results are presented on individual test pit logs and R -value testing is presented in Appendix B. GEOTECHNICAL OPINIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS It is our opinion the site is suitable from a geotechnical standpoint for the proposed project, provided the recommendations in this letter are accomplished. At this time, since proposed grading in the western portion of the site is undetermined, our recommendations are limited to subsurface stormwater disposal, general earthwork recommendations, and pavement design recommendations for the proposed subdivision. No recommendations for lot fill or individual lots have been provided at this time. The subsurface conditions may vary at the project site and this variation may not be known until construction. Variations in soil and groundwater conditions may impact construction plans and/or costs. Earthwork We recommend test pits be relocated in the field prior to earthwork construction. Any test pit backfill located beneath a future pavement, sidewalk, or building area should be re - excavated to sufficient depth to expose native soil and compacted to structural fill criteria, as described below. We recommend soil with vegetation and root matter be stripped beneath all planned pavement and sidewalk areas to a minimum depth of 6 inches below ground surface. In some areas increased stripping depths may be required to ensure removal of vegetation and root matter. It is our opinion that this stripped material is unsuitable for reuse as structural fill. We recommend that this material be disposed of or stockpiled on-site for use in landscaping areas. The stripped subgrade in pavement and sidewalk areas should be proofrolled with a minimum of 5 passes with a vibratory roller with a drum weight greater than 5 tons. If any weaving or pumping is observed, those areas should be removed to firm soil and replaced with ORO IDAHO MONTANA NEVADA OREGON UTAH WASHINGTON WYOMING www.stratageotech.com Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Blackrock Subdivision File: HUBHOM B06167A Page 5 structural fill. Once a stable subgrade has been achieved, structural fill can commence to the desired site grades. STRATA should observe all proofrolling and site preparation procedures to verify no soft or pumping areas exist before placing structural fill. Structural fill should be free from vegetation and organics and be moisture -conditioned sufficiently to achieve compaction requirements. All structural fill (imported or reused on-site soil) should be classified as sand and gravel (SP, SW, SM, GP, GW, GM or ML) in accordance with the USCS. All structural fill should have cobbles less than 6 inches in diameter. Silty soils (SM, GM, or ML) may be used for structural fill; however, these soils must be moisture conditioned to near optimum moisture content during placement. Additionally, during periods of extended wet or cold weather, silt soils may be difficult to utilize as structural fill. On-site native soil meeting the requirements outlined above may be used as structural fill, however, clay should not be utilized as structural fill. Structural fill should be placed to the subgrade elevation in uniform, maximum 8 -inch - thick, loose lifts, and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum dry density of the soil, as determined by ASTM D 698 (Standard Proctor). This assumes heavy compaction equipment, such as rollers, with a minimum drum weight of 5 tons is used. The maximum loose lift thickness should be reduced where smaller and/or lighter compaction equipment is used. STRATA must be retained to perform field density testing of structural fill to verify contractor compliance with the above minimum compaction criteria. Note that these earthwork recommendations are applicable to roadway areas only and earthwork recommendations for individual lots are not included in our scope of services, as proposed grading plans have not been developed. Wet Weather[Wet Soil Conditions We recommend site construction be undertaken during dry weather conditions. If site construction, particularly grading, is undertaken during wet periods of the year, the on-site clay, clayey sand, or silt will be susceptible to pumping or rutting when subjected to heavy loads from rubber -tired equipment or vehicles which exert a point load. Wet weather earthwork should be performed by low pressure, track -mounted equipment that spread and reduce the vehicle load. Work should not be performed immediately after rainfall. All loose and disturbed areas should be excavated to undisturbed soil or recompacted to structural fill requirements. Compaction of the fill should be sufficient to preclude pumping of the underlying soil. In summary, careful construction procedures are paramount to the successful grading operation if the on-site soil is wet. Additional precautions should be taken if subgrade soils are to be exposed to freezing temperatures. STRATA should be contacted to provide recommendations prior to initiating or delaying construction during wet or cold weather in order to improve earthwork efficiency, achieve a stable subgrade and to help mitigate frost conditions. Pavement Areas Recommendations outlined in the Earthwork section of this report should be accomplished in all pavement areas. The pavement subgrade is anticipated to be at a depth of approximately 12 to 18 inches below existing grades, and is anticipated to consist of lean IDAHO MONTANA NEVADA OREGON UTAH WASHINGTON WYOMING www.stra tageotech, co m Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Blackrock Subdivision File: HUBHOM B06167A Page 6 clay, silty sand, or sandy silt, depending on location. STRATA has performed R -value testing on sandy silt soil collected from a depth of 1.5 to 2.0 feet in the vicinity of TP -8. An R -value of 65 was obtained for this soil. Additionally, STRATA has previously performed R -value testing on near surface soils for Taconic Drive, located in the central portion of the site. An R -value of 14 was obtained for clayey sand soil collected from depths of 2.0 to 2.5 feet in TP -16, advanced in January, 2005. Clay soils were observed at or below anticipated pavement subgrade elevations in several test pits advanced throughout the site, although silt soils may also be exposed in several areas. STRATA has assumed an R -value of 10 for the pavement subgrade to reflect the presence of clay soil and variable conditions. We recommend the following flexible asphalt pavement section be utilized. Local Roadways - Flexible Pavement (TI=6.0) 2.5"- Type III asphalt concrete top course 4.0"-'/< inch -minus, crushed sand and gravel base course 12.0"- Pit -run sand and gravel subbase course Collector Roadways - Flexible Pavement (TI=8.0) 3.0"- Type III asphalt concrete top course 6.0"- %-inch-minus, crushed sand and gravel base course 15.0"- Pit -run sand and gravel subbase course STRATA recommends that we be retained to visually inspect pavement subgrade soils and verify the subgrade soils prior to placement of structural subbase. Additionally, once grading has been determined, STRATA is available to provide additional consultation and identify areas where, based on anticipated subgrade soils, the recommended pavement sections may be modified to reflect actual subgrade soil conditions. The above -recommended flexible pavement section is based on a maximum 20 -year design life and a traffic index (TI) of 6.0 assuming local roads and 8.0 assuming collector roads. If the subgrade is wet at the time of construction, we recommend a woven geotextile such as Contech C200 be considered over silt or clay soils prior to placing the subbase course. The subbase should consist of 6 -inch -minus, well -graded sand and gravel consistent with Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC) Section 801 and with less than 10 percent passing the No. 200 sieve. The base course should consist of 3/4 -inch -minus, well - graded, crushed sand and gravel with less than 9 percent passing the No. 200 sieve and consistent with ISPWC Section 802. The subbase and base course should be compacted in accordance with the Earthwork section of this report. The asphalt concrete for the flexible pavement area should have material properties as specified in ASTM D 3515 and have a mix design with a maximum aggregate size between 3/4 and 3/8 inch. The asphalt concrete should be compacted as required by ISPWC Sections 809 and 810. IDAHO MONTANA NEVADA OREGON UTAH WASHINGTON WYOMING www.strataneotech.com Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Blackrock Subdivision File: HUBHOM B06167A Page 7 We recommend crack maintenance be accomplished in all pavement areas as needed and at least every three to five years to reduce the potential for surface water infiltration into the pavement section and underlying subgrade. Stormwater Disposal Infiltration Rates All runoff from impermeable areas and other large volumes of stormwater should be directed and maintained away from the proposed structures and not be allowed to infiltrate the subgrade soil beneath paved areas. All drainage should be directed to an approved discharge and/or collection facility, such as seepage beds or drainage swales, located no closer than 25 feet away from anticipated building foundations. Percolation tests were performed in various test pits within uncemented poorly -graded gravel soils encountered during the field investigation. Of the soil types encountered within the test pits, silt and clay soils typically exhibit long-term infiltration rates of less than 2 inches per hour. In filtration rates within non-cemented silty sand typically range from 4 to 12 inches per hour, while infiltration rates for poorly -graded gravel and sand encountered at depth in test pits are estimated at greater than 40 inches per hour. STRATA recommends infiltration facilities be extended a minimum of 1 foot into poorly - graded sand or gravel soil encountered at depths as shallow as 1.5 feet to greater than 11 feet. Depth to sand and gravel was observed to increase in the western, topographically elevated portions of the site. However, based on previous exploration performed in this area under the direction of STRATA, native sand and gravel soils are anticipated to be encountered at depth. We recommend that infiltration facilities be designed utilizing an allowable infiltration rate of 8 inches per hour. As previously discussed, groundwater was encountered at depths as shallow as approximately 3 to 4 feet below existing ground surface. The extent to which groundwater levels vary throughout the year is undetermined at this time, however STRATA has installed standpipe piezometers in each test pit location and is presently monitoring groundwater levels on an approximate monthly basis. STRATA will continue to monitor groundwater levels and is able to provide groundwater information following extended monitoring. Note that depending on time of year of construction and type of infiltration facility, infiltration facility excavation dewatering may be required. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDED SERVICES This evaluation has been provided based on limited laboratory tests and analysis. Further, the project concept and proposed grading has not been fully developed at the time of this report. As such, this evaluation should not be considered comprehensive. STRATA must be retained to review final construction plans and specifications to verify our geotechnical recommendations. Additionally, once grading plans have been developed, STRATA should be retained to determine if additional analysis is required and to provide recommendations specifically relating to proposed grading, particularly in the western portion of the proposed development. IDAHO MONTANA NEVADA OREGON UTAH WASHINGTON WYOMING www.strataneotech.com Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Blackrock Subdivision File: HUBHOM B06167A Page 8 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND TESTING We recommend STRATA be retained to observe the exposed soil surface prior to structural fill placement to verify site stripping, unsuitable soil removal and excavation has been accomplished in accordance with this report. In addition, we recommend STRATA be retained to observe that infiltration facilities have been excavated into the above recommended soil. STRATA can also provide construction materials testing of concrete, reinforcement, and asphalt. If we are not retained to perform the recommended services, we cannot be responsible for related construction errors or omissions. The recommended services are not included in this evaluation and would be billed on a time and expense basis EVALUATION LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared to provide limited geotechnical services for infrastructure improvements the proposed Blackrock Subdivision located in Meridian, Idaho. This report does not provide evaluation or earthwork recommendations for individual lot development. Our services consist of professional opinions made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices as they exist at the time of this report and in Southwest Idaho. This acknowledgement is in lieu of all express or implied warranties. We appreciate the opportunity to assist you on this project. If you have any questions, please call. cr47t€14 ! ViBT'd Sincerely, 1 0 € Brent Norris, E.I.T. Field Engineer Michael G. Woodworth, P.E. Project Engineer AM/MGW/kf Enclosures: Plate 1: Site Plan with Test Pit Locations Plate 2: Groundwater Monitoring Data Plate 3: R -Value Test Data Appendix A: Exploratory Test Pit Logs and Unified Soil Classification System cc: Mr. David Bailey, Bailey Engineering, Inc. IbI IDAHO MONTANA NEVADA OREGON UTAH WASHINGTON WYOMING www.stratageotech.co m a m N O �• N m m r ®a =m x � �r�tvdpvvv r r r r r r D_ A A A A X A A A CL 1� r OQ O 6 (3) 6 m , A I- aO 7 N M (3) '..O Un Mq.r V 0 O a r L n F A "ACY) A C 'a+ Or (Q. (O (6 (6 (D (o 26 (O N .� W_. W'A' WA 00 Q CL rn 3 n 0'0 0 p(ia(n(n0 A � C d O a p OO O O O C) O " C y_ H A` _ _ A _ _ _ 0) AIA A' A A A I I I I I I I I I 1 0 Q 0 IL N EL F 6 (0 t; 00w w w m _,gc U O O o d ?_ M. O r N V' (6 Cl) -6 G M V N W N(6000)O a C d F r-rr a0 (D'O(()r W N Oy N m N ci 1 r'd: r 0, It to I, J O C f V V n6c0 c0 (6 0 N d a Y C Po(L M' V M d' (4. (O (6 (0 N 3 � e _ D a � oo *5 m � N � N h 00: aa�� N )n Q N'r (�I N N.N NN « N L ® mQ a U p U O p z 0'.. p» N N l0 g Z 0 N O 1� O N U ❑ N R -VALUE IDAHO T-8 Project: Proposed Black Rock Lewis Subdivision Client: Hubble Homes Sample ID: Subgrade Soil Location: TP - 8 @ 1.5 - 2.0 ft. Soil Description: Silty Sand with Gravel (Caliche) R VALUE DATA Percolation: Trace POInt 1 P0102 P°Int 3 Exudation, PSI 119 159 279 Dry Density, PCF 92,7 92,8 93.5 Moisture Content, % 24.7 24.3 23.9 Exp. Pressure, PSI0.09 0.22 0.31 0 v N M 5 w. El N O 0 0 m 5 0 0 M 0 O N oI1'IIP,IIIIIIIIIIIIo R value Note: This report covers only material as represented by this sample and does not necessarily cover all soil from this layer or source. Lab Number: B61 -1630E File Name: HUBHOM B06167A Date Sampled: 7/31/06 Sampled by: BN/Strata Date Received: 8/14106 Tested by: tc/Strata SOIL CONSTANTS R VALUE: 65 GRADATION: AA5HTO T-111 T27 SCREEN AS RECEIVED AS TESTED SIZE %PASSING %PASSING 4" 3" 2" 1" 3/4" 100 100 i!Z" 3/8" No. 4 No. 8 No. 16 No. 30 No. 50 No. 100 No. 200 Reviewed by: lnlryvYy! , en�.:1 nq. Plate 3 FAMM Al J W a REMARKS N USCS Description N Hg �6 .—� �•� y d C^ o a o Note: BGS =Below Ground E Surface a Silty SAND (Native) — tan, SM 0 ® ° Moderate vegetation dense, moist. ° ® and organics observed v to 6 inches BGS. 1 e e' ° ®e gy ° ° e Poorly—Graded SAND with SP Gravel — brown, dense, wet. 2 y �a 3�e-sa-ai � •, s 4 >9_ T d 5 e, n d 4 ED 8. v`3 b. +l Test pit terminated at 7 Standpipe piezometer p P feet BGS due to caving installed to 7 feet conditions. BGS. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Client: HUBHOM Test Pit Number: TP -1 EXPLORATORY pI� T TEST PIT LOG ' `<'�"� �•+''N' Sheet 1 of 1 Project: 806167A Date Excavated: 8-7-2006 Backhoe: CASE 580 SUPER Bucket Width: 2' Depth to Groundwater: 3.6' Logged By: BN C'O v w c REMARKS USCS Description 4 N J T N y G p 2 Y d m-- Note: BGS Below Ground z o a E Surface U Lean CLAY (Native) — brown, CL Moderate vegetation stiff to very stiff, moist. and organics observed to 6 inches BGS. 1 1.5-2.0 Lean CLAY With Sand CL brown, stiff to very stiff, z 2 moist. \ Poorly—Graded GRAVEL with GP Sand — tan, dense, moist to �.'..,. saturated. fe-sa-as) 4 . 0 5 6 7 O: ' 8 Test pit terminated at 9 Standpipe piezometer feet BGS due to caving installed 9 feet conditions. BGS. 10 11 12 13 14 15 Client: HUBHOM Test Pit Number: TP -2 EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG S T R aT a '^"�"'r•"^"'"">'"'"•"'�9 Sheet 1 of 1 Project: B061 67A Date Excavated: 8-7-2006 Backhoe: CASE 580 SUPER Bucket Width: 2' Depth to Groundwater: 4.1 Logged By: BN yC,REMARKS USCS Description E4 N m a o N= Note: BGS _ Below Ground Surface Poorly—Graded GRAVEL with GP Moderate vegetation Silt and Sand (Fill) — brown, and and organics observed dense, moist. to 6 inches BGS. 2 D: Poorly—Graded GRAVEL with GP Sand (Native) — tan, dense, 3 P. moist to saturated. D: 4 5 D: 6 7 IF P" Test pit terminated at 7.5 = e Stand i piezometer feet BGS due to caving 8 installed to 7,5 feet conditions. BGS. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Client: HUBHOM Test Pit Number: TP-3 EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG '""" "'"'�" "' Sheet of Project: B06167A Date Excavated: 8-7-2006 Backhoe: CASE 580 SUPER Bucket Width: 2' Depth to Groundwater: 7.4' Logged By: BN USCS Description Lean CLAY (Native) — brown, stiff to very stiff, moist. Sandy SILT — ton, very stiff, ML slightly moist. v w REMARKS _ wd UN m d� NN> > Nom` Ya w " wr 5 � � >• °' d h ? � O c o. o � .. Note: BGS = Below Ground O c U r~ a O E Surface CL Moderate vegetation - and organics observed 1.5_2 to 6 inches BGS. -1 Sandy SILT — ton, very stiff, ML slightly moist. 3 Silty SAND — tan, dense, z SM ® r, moist. 4 @ a 0 — a e a = a e roony—uraaea UNAVLL with Sand — tan, dense, moist to saturated. feet BGS due to caving conditions. Client: HUBHOM Project: B06167A Backhoe: CASE 580 SUPEF Depth to Groundwater: 4.3' GP 6 p 7 go F. 10 12 13 14 15 Test Pit Number: TP -4 Date Excavated: 8-7-2006 Bucket Width: 2' Logged By: BN 2-2.5 Standpipe piezometer installed to 8 feet BGS. T FR a -r a EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG Sheet 1 of 1 CO w •y REMARKS W USCS Descri p tion VI J m W o d �� a a O aV: v v w p c 5 U a O O o .. Note: BGS = Below Ground E Surface Fat CLAY (Native) — brown, CL Moderate vegetation stiff to very stiff, moist. and organics observed \ 4.5+ to 6 inches BGS. 1 BG 95 28'1 2.0 Atterberg Limits: LL=571 PI=35 Silty SAND — tan, dense, SM ®m moist. ® m m m c ®� m 3 m ® a Weak cementation observed from 3 to m ® 4 feet BGS. m BG 4 mmm mem mmm mmm 5 m e m�e w e Poorly—Graded GRAVEL with Sand — tan, dense, moist to _GP saturated. 7 O: '• 8 9 Test pit terminated at 10 Standpipe piezometer feet BGS. installed to 10 feet BGS. 11 12 13 14 15 Client: HUBHOM Test Pit Number: TP-5 EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG ""'. Sheet 1 of 1 Project: B06167A Date Excavated: 8-7-2006 Backhoe: CASE 580 SUPER Bucket Width: 2' Depth to Groundwater: 6.2' Logged By: BN Lean CLAY (Native) — brown, CL stiff to very stiff, moist. 2 Sandy SILT — ton, firm, ML slightly, moist. 3 w REMARKS 5 6 USCS Description 7 Note: BGS Below Ground v = b\ o Surface SILT — brown, stiff, moist. ML Moderate vegetation and organics observed to 6 inches BGS. Lean CLAY (Native) — brown, CL stiff to very stiff, moist. 2 Sandy SILT — ton, firm, ML slightly, moist. 3 4 5 6 7 Noorly—craned GKAVLL with Sand — ton, dense, moist to saturated. Test pit terminated at 11 feet BGS. Client: HUBHOM Project: B061 67A Backhoe: CASE 580 SUPER Depth to Groundwater: N/A GP F - 9 O 10 f 12 13 14 15 0 Test Pit Number: TP -7 Date Excavated: 8-7-2006 Bucket Width: 2' Logged By: BN 14 STRa ■ a I to 11 feet BGS. TEST PIT LOG Sheet 1 of 1 w i. _ REMARKS N USCS Description w N N O WFO J y ._ O a °' - C� o g Y� Jtl $ Note: BGS = Below Ground �T E Surface c� Lean CLAY Native — brown, CL Moderate vegetation stiff to very stiff, moist. and organics observed 8G to 6 inches BGS. 1 Weakly cemented from Sandy SILT — tan, very stiffML to hard, slightly, moist. LK 1.5 to 4.5 feet BGS. 2 3 BG a Silty SAND — tan, dense, SM ® moist. m 5 w ®® � � a ® e e BG 6 a a e a a a e a` a 7 o ®°a e a' so® 9 oea e o' e ® a ro w' 10 gne e 0 w n Test pit terminated at 11 feet BGS. 12 13 14 15 Client: HUBHOM Test Pit Number: TP -8 EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG S T R aT "'r"""'""�Sheet 1 of 1 Project: B06167A Date Excavated: 8-7-2006 Backhoe: CASE 580 SUPER Bucket Width: 2' Depth to Groundwater: N/A Logged By: BN.,r^"`T d Jo o v y b REMARKS l Description y v ? d c ? � � w o a g Note: BGS = Below Ground E Surface SILT (Fill) — brown, firm, ML Moderate vegetation slightly moist. With grass and organics observed clippings. to 4 feet BGS. 1 8 fi 2 3 Sandy SILT Native — tan, ML firm, slightly, moist. Br' Moderate cementation observed from 5 to Silty S — tan, dense, SM a moist. ®e 6.5feet BGS. � ® e w p a Silty SAND with Cobbles tan, dense, moist. 7 o, 8 ®a "' Maximum cobble size 12 inch diameter. w a Poorly—Graded SAND with SP a Cobbles — tan, dense, moist. 9 Test pit terminated at 10 feet BGS. 11 12 13 14 15 Client: HUBHOM Test Pit Number: TP -9 EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG r ,"�� •^'"� Sheet 1 of 1 Project: B06167A Date Excavated: 8-7-2006 Backhoe: CASE 580 SUPER Bucket Width: 2' Depth to Groundwater: N/A Logged By: BN^''�' J w o REMARKS USCS Description m a '^ w N - " !; o a o Note: BGS = Below Ground - E Surface Clayey SAND (Native) - SC e a4.5+ Moderate vegetation brown, dense, moist. a tlp and organics observed © @ s to 6 inches BGS. ® 1 ® e@ a � e @ e .a R 19 18.5 1.5-1.0 Atterberg Limits: LL=37, PI=18 LeanCLAY with Sand - tan, CL stiff, moist. \ 3 BG \ Silty SAND with Gravel - tan, SM ® dense, moist. e e e tl � e � m w 5 w ®@e tle� 6 tl m' @°e' ma@' a � s tl' @ 7 rye® 6 9 6 9 @ tl 8 6 @ �etl N ® Q ® @ tl tl @ tl 9 @ ® a ® tl 4 0 8 e 10 e a e Q fA <F 6 S, 9 P 4 @ @ Test pit terminated at 11 Standpipe piezometer feet BGS. installed to 11 feet BGS. 12 13 14 15 Client: HUBHOM Test Pit Number: TP -10 EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG S T R aT a ...... Sheet 1 of 1 Project: B06167A Date Excavated: 8-7-2006 Backhoe: CASE 580 SUPER Bucket Width: 2' Depth to Groundwater: N/A Logged By: BN 11-� � REMARKS USCS Description N J J o d q d o a v 2 a ;, a, Note: BGS = Below Ground E Surface SILT with Sand (Native) — ML Moderate vegetation tan, hard, moist. and organics observed to 6 inches BGS. 1 4.5+ Sandy SILT — tan, stiff to ML very stiff, slightly, moist. 2 2.0 3 4 5 Silty SAND — ton, dense, SM moist. s . 7 ®e w e � 9 ® v ® w m e 9 a p ` A 9 o A a 9 @ U & Test pit terminated at 10 Standpipe piezometer feet BGS. installed to 10 feet BGS. 11 12 13 14 15 Client: HUBHOM Test Pit Number: TP -11 EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG T R aT a Sheet oft Project: B061 67A Date Excavated: 8-7-2006 Backhoe: CASE 580 SUPER Bucket Width: 2' Depth to Groundwater: N/A Logged By: BN^"`+"'r"`"""�'�'""'� I Silty SAND — tan, dense, SM W m e moist. 3= N y REMARKS USCS Description n ` Client: HUBHOM T I ' = o � Backhoe: CASE 580 SUPER Bucket Width: 2' w 5 4 d O N y w D a o � a�`' _ Note: BGS Below Ground O c U~ o e e e Surface 01.10 Lean CLAY (Native) — brown, CL Moderate vegetation stiff, moist. and organics observed to 6 inches BGS. 1 I Silty SAND — tan, dense, SM W m e moist. 3= m e ie-sa-0s) a o Client: HUBHOM Test Pit Number: TP -13 I wAa EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG Sheet 1 of 1 Project: B06167A Date Excavated: 8-7-2006 Backhoe: CASE 580 SUPER Bucket Width: 2' a@e 4 e e a o o e e e 01.10 roony-0raaea UR VLL wrtn Sand — tan, dense, moist to saturated. feet BK 96 17 Atterberg Limits: LL=96, P1=10 Standpipe piezometer installed to 9 feet BGS. 15 Client: HUBHOM Test Pit Number: TP -13 I 140 EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG Sheet 1 of 1 Project: B06167A Date Excavated: 8-7-2006 Backhoe: CASE 580 SUPER Bucket Width: 2' Depth to Groundwater. 29' Logged By: BN USCS Description Leon CLAY (Native) — brown, stiff to very stiff, moist. Sandy SILT — tan, firm, ML slightly, moist. w REMARKS 3 Silty SAND — tan, dense, Note: BGS = Below Ground a moist. 4 ri A a ® 0 w � Surface 5 CL a u a m c Moderate vegetation o v and organics observed to 6 inches BGS. Sandy SILT — tan, firm, ML slightly, moist. 2 3 Silty SAND — tan, dense, SM a moist. 4 ri A a ® 0 w � e 5 a u a m c o v t,00ny—uraoea ertnvtu witn Sand — tan, dense, moist to 6 saturated. p' feet Client: HUBHOM Project: 806167A Backhoe: CASE 580 SUPER Depth to Groundwater: 7.7' 7 D: 11 12 13 14 15 Test Pit Number: TP -14 Date Excavated: 8-7-2006 Bucket Width: 2' Logged By: BN Percolation test performed at 6 feet BGS. Infiltration rate =40 in/hr measured. Standpipe piezometer installed to 10 feet BGS. EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG Sheet 1 of 1 r REMARKS SN USCS L? Description a p NN O Jm CON jv cr. NO a Note: BGS — Below Ground a a E Surface Lean CLAY — brown, hard, CL Moderate vegetation moist. and organics observed to 6 inches BGS. 1 \ 4.5+ Moderate cementation observed froml.5to BG 4.5+ 3.5feet BGS. Sandy SILT — tan, firm, ML slightly, moist. 3 Silty ton, dense, SM 6 moist. �®® 4 a N v 5 ®®a N e®a e®a A Poorly—Graded GRAVELwith GP ' Sand — tan, dense, moist to .0 ' saturated. 7 O' ' 8 9 Test pit terminated at 10 feet BGS. 11 12 13 14 15 Client: HUBHOM Test Pit Number: TP -15 EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG S T R aT a r^"'�"r^°-«'�"'�'�-•'^•'°� Sheet 1 of 1 Project: B06167A Date Excavated: 8-7-2006 Backhoe: CASE 580 SUPER Bucket Width: 2' Depth to Groundwater: N/A Logged By: BN 2 3 Silty — ton,, ense, Sm moist. ,� x REMARKS USCS Description Client: HUBHOM Test Pit Number: TP -16 I w e Project: B06167A Date Excavated: 8-7-2006 Backhoe: CASE 580 SUPER Bucket Width: 2' ® ® o gg a e Note: BGS = Below Ground 5 E Surface ® a V Lean CLAY (Native) — brown, CL Moderate vegetation stiff to very stiff, moist. and organics observed 3.5 to 6 inches BGS. 1 2 3 Silty — ton,, ense, Sm moist. ,� x 4 Client: HUBHOM Test Pit Number: TP -16 I w e Project: B06167A Date Excavated: 8-7-2006 Backhoe: CASE 580 SUPER Bucket Width: 2' ® ® o a e re 5 ® a runny—uruueu vrwvnL mui GP V . Sand — tan, dense, moist to 6 saturated. i 7 feet 12 13 14 BG 82 18.2 1.5-2.0 Atterberg Limits: LL=301 PI=8 Standpipe piezometer installed to 11 feet BGS. 15 Client: HUBHOM Test Pit Number: TP -16 I 140 T.. ""� EXPLORATORY TEST PIT LOG Sheet 1of1 Project: B06167A Date Excavated: 8-7-2006 Backhoe: CASE 580 SUPER Bucket Width: 2' Depth to Groundwater: 8.6 Logged By: BN^':'�^ UNIFIED SOILS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS 2—Inch OD Split—Spoon Sample— LETTER SYMBOL TYPICAL NAMES Baggie Sample California Modified 3—Inch OD Split—Spoon Sample 0 Groundwater _ at Time of Drilling GWWell—Graded Gravel, fI Rock Core CLEAN RG Ring Sample Gravel—Sand Mixtures. Shelby Tube 3—Inch OD GRAVELS a GPPoorly—Graded Gravel, GRAVELSGravel—Sand Mixtures. GRAVELSGM Silty Gravel, Gravel— WITH Sand—Silt Mixtures. GC Clayey Gravel, Gravel— COARSE FINES Sand—Clay Mixtures. GRAINED SOILS � ,;,�3 „„ 0 „ „ 0 „ 0 SW Well—Graded Sand, CLEAN E Gravelly Sand. SANDS Poorly—Graded Sand, SP Gravelly Sand. SANDS SANDS © - ” Silty Sand, w .Sm Sand—Silt Mixtures, WITH FINES �r > Sc Clayey Sand, Sand—Clay Mixtures. Inorganic Silt, Sandy ML or Clayey Silt, SILTS AND CLAYS Inorganic Clay of Low LIQUID LIMIT CL to Medium Plasticity, LESS THAN 50% Sandy or Silty Clay. I I I I OL Organic Silt and Clay I 1 I of Low Plasticity. FINE GRAINED Inorganic Silt, Mica— SOILS MH ceous Silt, Plastic Silt. SILTS AND CLAYS Inorganic Clay of High CH Plasticity, Fat Clay. LIQUID LIMIT OH Organic Clay of Medium GREATER THAN 50% � to High Plasticity. Peat, Muck and Other - PT Highly Organic Soils. SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART IStandard 2—Inch OD Split—Spoon Sample— ® Groundwater After 24 Hours BG Baggie Sample California Modified 3—Inch OD Split—Spoon Sample 0 Groundwater _ at Time of Drilling BK Bulk Sample fI Rock Core RG Ring Sample Shelby Tube 3—Inch OD Undisturbed Sample BORING LOG SYMBOLS GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS TEST PIT LOG SYMBOLS FaR Hearing Date: October 17, 2013 File No.: PP-13-028 Project Name: Whitebark Subdivision Request: Request for preliminary plat consisting of 55 single-family residential buildi common/other lots on 19 acres of land in an R-4 zoning district, b ng lots and and T & M Holdings, LLC. y Cindy K. Lewis Trust Location: The site is located at 2135 E. Amity Road, in the NW % of Section 32 Range lE. Township 3N. Clerk - Please schedule the followin MDA concurrent with the plat at City Council application to run File No.: MDA-13-018 Request: Request for a modification to the development agreement to increase of building lots allowed to develop on the site consi preliminary plat. stent with the proposed tuber