Loading...
Fast Eddy's RZ-13-006 CUP-13-006CITY OF MERIDIAN E IDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ^' AND DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of the Request for a Rezone of 5.52 Acres of Land fl•om the C-N to the C-C Zoning District for the Property Located at 710, 730, 750, 770, & 790 W. Usticlc Road; and Conditional Use Permit for Extended Business Hours of Operation for• Fast Eddy's Located at 710 W. Usticlc Road, by Steve Eddy. Case No(s}. RZ-13-006; CUP-13-006 For the City Council Hearing Date of: August 20, 2013 (Findings on September 3, 2013} A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 20, 2013, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 20, 2013, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 20, 2013, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 20, 2013, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (LC. §67-6503). 2, The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian leas, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plays of the City of Meridian, which was adopted April 19, 20l 1, Resolution No. 1 I-784 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-SA. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the govea•nmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. Tt is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. CITY OF MF.R[I~IAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OP LAW AND DF;CISION cec. ORDI/R CASE NO(S). RL-13-006; CUP-13-006 -1- 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Cleric and then a copy sewed by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Planning Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of August 20, 2013, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Cormcil's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-SA and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for a rezone and conditional use permit is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the attached Staff Report for the hearhrg date of August 20, 2013, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Two (2) Year Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit, when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two (2) years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time, the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence consh~uction of permanent footings or sh~uctures on or hI the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting, the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two (2) year period. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-SB-6.G.1, the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commnence the use not to exceed one (1) two (2) year period. Additional three extensions up to two (2) years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions, the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11(UDC 11-SB-6F). E. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, denial of a development application entitles the Owner to request a regidatory taking analysis. Such request nmst be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerknot more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a reguuatory takings analysis will toll the three period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. 2. Please Yake notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. When applicable and pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521, any affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the final action of the governing board may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of August 20, 2013 CITY OP MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FAC"I', CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). RZ-13-006; CUP-13-006 -2- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the ~3~1 day of 2013. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BRAD HOAGLUN COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT CHARLIE ROUNTREE COUNCIL MEMBER DAVID ZAREMBA COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD (TIE BREAKER) np1LDnD °QS° r Ta y e Weerd $c ~ o Attest: r p ~, rry~r "' ~onxo R ~ aycee H~l~an, City Cletk ~~de iAF AS~j VOTED VOTED~~_m-- VOTED VOTED VOTED Copy served upon Applicant, The Planning Department, Public Works Deparhnent and City Attorney. By: CITY OP MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASENO(S). RZ-13-006; CUP-13-006 -3- EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT Hearing Date: August 20, 2013 TQ: Mayor and City Council FRAM; Sonya Wafters, Associate City Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: Fast Eddy's - RZ-13-006; CUP-13-006 (~E IDIAN~-~- I. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST The applicant, Steve Eddy, leas applied for a rezone (RZ} of 5.52 acres of land from the C-N to the C-C zoning district. A conditional use permit (CUP) is also requested to extend the business hours of operation allowed in the C-C zoning district when a property abuts a residential use from 6:00 am to 5:30 am seven days a week, and from] 1:00 ptn to 12:00 am on Fridays and Sahu•days in accord with UDC 11-2B-3A.4 for Fast Eddy's convenience store. See Sectio77 IXA/7alysis fo/' /110]'G 717f01'/17LlhOT7. II. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed RZ & CUP with the conditions listed in Exhibit B, based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Exhibit C of the Staff Report. The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard these items on July 18, 2013 At the public hearing, the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subiect RZ and CUP requests a. Summary of Commission Public Hearin: i. In favor: Steve Eddv ii. In opposition: None iii. Commentin: None iv. Written testimony: Steve Eddv v. Staff presentin application: Sonya Wafters vi. Other staff commentin on application: None b. Ivey Issue(s) of Discussiou by Commission: i. The UDC does not allow reauests for extender c. Key Commission Charle(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. None d. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. None 2 mmarv of City Council Pu ~lic Hearin In fav or: Steve Eddy ii. In opp osition: None iii. Comm enting: None ~ Writte n testimony: None ~ St f n resentin~ applicat ion: Sonya Wafters yi. Other staff commenting on anplication• None ~i I{e v Issues of Discussion by Council: i ne Past Eddy's K7-13-006; CLJP-13-006 PAGE I EXHIBIT A c ev Council Chanties to Commission Recommendation i. Nine III. PROPOSED MOTION Approval After considering all staff; applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Numbers RZ-13- 006 8r CUP-13-006 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of August 20, 2013, with the followhlgmodifications: (Add any proposed modifications.) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to decry File Numbers RZ-13-006 & CUP-13-006 as presented during the hearing on August 20, 2013, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial and what the applicant could do to gain your approval with another application.) Continuance I Inoue to continue File Numbers RZ-13-006 & CUP-13-006 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location: The property subject to the rezone is located at 710, 730, 750, 770 & 790 W. Ustick Road; the property subject to the CUP is located at 710 W. Ustick Road, in the SE'/a of Section 36, Township 4 North, Range 1 West B. Owner(s): Steve Eddy 2151 N. Greenview Ct. Eagle, ID 83616 C. Applicant: Steve Eddy, ST Investments 2151 N. Greenview Ct. Eagle, ID 83616 D. Applicants Statement/Justification: Please see applicant's narrative for this information. V. PROCESS FACTS A. The subject application is for a rezone and conditional use permit. A public hearing is required before the Planning & Zoniug Commission and City Council on this matter, consistent with Meridian City Code Title I1, Chapter 5. B. Newspaper notifications published on: July ],and 15, 2013(Couunission); Jnly 29, and Au ust 12, 20]3 (Gifu Council) C. Radius nofices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: June 20, 2013(Commission); July 25, 2013 (City Councip D. Applicant posted notice on site by: July 8, 2013(Commission); August 9, 2013 (City Council) Fast Eddy's R/.-13-006; CUP-13-006 PAGE 2 EXHIBIT A VI. LAND US?/ A. Existing Land Use(s) and Zoning: The land use on the subject property consists of a variety of uses including a convenience store/fiiel facility/carwash, offices and restaurants. B. Adjacent Land Use and Zoning: North: Vacant property owned by the school dish~ict, zoned R-4 South: Ustick Road & rural residential property, zoned RUT in Ada County East: Residential property, zoned RUT in Ada County West: Vacant commercial property, zoned C-C Fast Eddy's RZ-13-006; CUP-13-006 PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A C. History of Previous Actions: • In 2000, the property received the following approvals: - Annexation (AZ-00-019) with an R-4 zoning dish•ict. A development agreement was required as a provision of annexation, recorded as Instrument No. 102067381; and - Preliminary plat (PP-00-018) for Cedar Springs Subdivision. • In 2003, the property received the following approvals: - Rezone (RZ-03-013) from R-4 to C-N; - Conditional use permit (CUP-03-067) for a planned development consisting of four (4) office buildings, a car wash, two (2) fiiel pumps, and adrive-thru coffee stand in a C-N zonurg dish'ict; and - Preliminary plat (PP-03-044) for Cedar Springs Professional Center consisting of 5 building lots and 1 common/other lot on 5.51 acres of land. • hi 2004, a final plat (FP-04-074) was approved (Cedar Springs Subdivision No. 6). • In 2005, the property received the following approvals: - A modification to the development agreement (RZ-03-O] 3, Instrument No. 105058639) was approved to allow a car wash, coffee stand/kiosk, fuel pumps, and office uses as approved with CUP-03-067; - A modification to the development agreement (MI-OS-008, [nstrumentNo. 105058639) was approved to include the addition of a convenience store and to allow the convenience store to operate 24 hours a day; and - A modification to the conditional use permit (MCU-OS-002) was approved to allow the operation of a 2,200 square foot convenience store and to remove the previously approved coffee kiosk. • In 2007, a modification to the development agreement (MI-07-001, Instrument No. 107158811) was approved to allow all principally permitted uses iu the C-N district to be allowed on Lots 5, 6, 7, & 8, Block 25 instead of just oftlce uses as previously approved. D. Utilities: 1. Public Works: a. Location of sewer: The existing buildings on this site are connected to City services. b. Location of water: The existing buildings on this site are connected to City services. c. Issues or concerns: None E. Physical Features: 1. Canals/Ditches L'rigation: There are no canals or ditches on this site. 2. Hazards: Staff is not aware of any hazards that exist on this site. 3. Flood Plain: This site is not withur a flood plain. Fasl Eddy's RZ-13-006; CiJP-13-006 PAGE 4 EXHIBIT A VII. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS This property is designated Mixed Use -Community with a Neighborhood Center (N.C.) overlay on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (PLUM). The purpose of the MU-C designation is to allocate areas where community-serving nses and dwellings are seamlessly integrated into the urban fabric. The intent is to integrate a variety opuses, including residential, and to avoid mainly single-use and strip commercial type buildings. The N.C. overlay areas, the City seeks a centralized, pedestrian- oriented, identifiable and day-to-day, service-oriented focal point for neighborhood scale development. The proposed use of the site is not changing; the existing struchu'es will continue to horse a variety of community-serving uses. Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this property and apply to the proposed use (staff analysis in italics): • "Require all eormnercial and industrial businesses to install and maintain landscaping." (2.01.03B) TJaere is an existuag landscaped sb•eet buffer on this site along W, UsBck Road and N Venable Avenue in accord with UDC Table 11-2C-3 and interval perking lot landscaping. • "Locate industrial and commercial uses where adequate water supply and water pressure are available for fire protection." (3.04.02A) There is adequate water supply crud pressure m~ailnble to the site for fn•e protection. • "Locate small-scale neighborhood commercial areas within plamied residential developments as part of the development plan." The existn~g small-scale cormnercial development on this site provides a variety of services to ea~isting residential raeigTzborhoods arad will provide sernices far futarre neighborhoods in t7~is area of tlae City. For the above-stated reasons, staff is of the opinion the proposed use is consistent with the applicable comprehensive plan policies and is apprropriate in this location. VIII. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE A. Purpose Statement of Zone: The purpose of the C-C district is to provide for the retail and service needs of the community in accord with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Allowed uses in the C- Cdistrict are a larger scale and broader mix of retail, office, and service nses with access to arterials or nonresidential collectors. B. Schedule of Use: Unified Development Code (UDC) Table I 1-2B-2 lists the permitted, accessory, conditional, and prohibited uses in the C-C zoning district. C. Dimensional Standards: The dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the C-C zoning dist~ict apply to development of this site. IX. ANALYSIS A. Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendatiori: Rezone: The applicant's request to rezone 5.52 acres of land fi•orn the C-N to the C-C zoning district is consistent with the MU-C and N.C. designation shown on the PLUM. The C-C district is listed in the Comprehensive Plan as a possible zoning choice for MU-C designated areas. Fast Eddy's RZ-13-00(; CUP-13-006 PAGE 5 EXHIBIT A This property was platted as Cedar Springs Subdivision No. 6. The primary reason for the rezone is for extended hours of operation for the convenience store proposed on Lot 5. The C-N district limits business hours from 6:00 am to 10:00 pm. The applicant proposes to relocate the existing convenience store, currently located on the corner of Venable &Ustick on Lot 1, to the existing building directly to the east on Lot 5. The existing convenience stare will then be used for storage. Retail use is a principal permitted use in the C-C disc ict. However, when a commercial use abuts a residential use or district, business hours of operation are limited from 6:00 am to 11:00 pm unless otherwise approved through a conditional use permit (CUP). Conditional Use Permit (CUP): A CUP is requested to extend the bushress hours of operation for the convenience store from 11:00 pm to 12:00 am on Fridays and Safirdays; and from 6:00 to 5:30 am seven days a week. The CUP only applies to Lot 5 (710 W. Ustick Rd.). There is one residence that abuts the site to the east at 650 W. Ustick Road; the FLUM designation for the residential property is Iv1U-C. The applicant submitted a letter of support from the adjacent property owner in support of the proposed rezone to C-C. Note: Tlae convenience store is czrrently allowed to operate 24 hozn•s a day on Lod 1(770 W. Ustick Rd.) dhrozrgl~ a provision of the existing denelopntent agreenrewt. There is only one home that abuts this site to the east. Because that home is situated in line with the building where the convenience store is proposed, headlights from vehicles shotddn't shine in their windows creating a dishu~bance as the parking lot is located on the north side of the building away from the dwelling. The Commission and Cotmcil should consider any testimony from this homeowner in determining if the extended hours of operation requested by the applicant may present a disturbance. Site Plan: A site plan is included in Exhibit A.2 that shows the configuration of the site, location of existing struchu•es and parking. Access: Access is provided to the site via W. Ustick Road and N. Venable Avenue. No new accesses are proposed. Parking: Adequate parking that meets the standards in UDC 11-3C-6 is provided on the site. Landscaping: There is existing landscaping on the site that complies with UDC standards. Certificate of Zoning Compliance: The applicant recently obtained approval of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design review application fiom the Planning Division for the fapade improvements proposed to the convenience store. Staff recommends approval of the proposed RZ and CUP with the conditions listed iu Exhibit B. X. J,rXHH3ITS A. Drawings 1. Vicinity & Aerial Map 2. Site/Landscape Plan B. Conditions of Approval 1. Planning Department 2. Public Wa•ks Department 3. Pire Department Fast Eddy's RZ-] 3-006; CUP-13-006 PAGE 6 EXHIBIT A 4. Police Department 5. Sanitary Service Company 6. Ada County Highway District 7. Parks Department C. Legal Description & Exhibit Map D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code Past Eddy's R%-13-006; CUP-13-006 PAGE 7 EXIIIBIT A Exhibit A.1: Vicinity & Aerial Map Pest Eddy's R1-13-006; CiTP-13-006 PAGE 8 EXHIBIT A Exhibit A.2: Site Plau (dated: 6/24/13) () ~jf Fast Eddy's RZ-13-006; CUP-13-006 PAGE 9 EXHIBIT A B. Conditions of Approval 1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1.1 The applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this site. 1.2 The business hours of operation for the convenience store proposed on Lot 5 are allowed from 5:30 am to 11:00 pm Monday thru Thursday and 5:30 am to 12:00 am Friday and Saturday. ].3 The Applicant shall have a maximum of two (2) yews to commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval listed above. If the use has not begun within two (2) years of approval, a new conditional nse permit must be obtained prior to operation or a time extension must be requested in accord with UDC 11-SB-6P. 1.4 Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or teens of the approved conditional use does not relieve the applicant of responsibility for compliance. 1.5 The applicant shall complete all required improvements prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. It is imlawfiil to use or occupy any building or sh'ucture until the Building Official has issued a Certificate of Occupancy. 2. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2.1 Public Works has no concerns with this application. 3. FIRE DEPARTMENT 3.1 The Fire Deparhnent has no connnents on this application. 4. POLICE DEPARTMENT 4.1 The Police Deparhnent has no concerns with this application. 5. REPUBLIC SERVICES 5.1 Republic Services has no concerns with this application. 6. PARKS DEPARTMENT 6. ] The Parlcs Department did not submit comments on this application Fast Eddy's RZ-13-006; CUP-13-006 PAGE 10 EXHIBIT A 7. AllA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT In response to your request for comment, the Ada County Highway District (ACRD) staff has reviewed the submitted application and site plan for the item referenced above. The applicant shall be required to meet the following conditions of approval: • Pedestrian Ramp Updates Minor Improvements Policv: ACRD District Policy 7203.3 states that minor improvements to existing streets adjacent to a proposed development may be required. These improvements are to correct deficiencies or replace deteriorated facilities. Included are sidewalk construction or replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused driveways with curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation or reconstruction of pedestrian ramps; pavement repairs; signs; traffic control devices; and other similar items. Staff CommentslRecommendations: In accordance with District Policy 7203.3 the applicant should be required to update the existing ramps located in the following locations so as to be ADA compliant: - The driveway on Ustick Road approximately 300-feet west of Venable Avenue. • Comply with all ACHD Standard Conditions of Approval (attached) as well as all ACHD Policies. • A traffic impact fee may be assessed by ACHD and will be due prior to the issuance of a building permit. This is a separate review process that requires direct plans submittal to the Development Review staff at the Highway District. For questions regarding the submittal for impact fee assessment please contact the Development Review staff at 208-387-6170. • Prior to the construction, repair, or installation of any roadway improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement widening, driveways, culverts, etc.), a permit must be obtainedfrom ACHD. Past Eddy's I2Z-13-006; CUP-13-006 PAGE I 1 EXHIBIT A C. Legal Description & Exhibit Map 9..13 N"[ST SifiT€STPEET 16~lSE, &t•R57Id ~ 2i~e.Gt~ii~539 I ~tii PGN.ti39.E9.#a 4•!8t{•: 6tr181E3 f'r~yr~t Na.; le~F5,R9 €tdPN@1T A t.ECidti DESCANr119Pt1 f41Fi F1E39P f++. 17@rKi~t GS lx}tt In~ludrtg gndar!lpsings Ssahdtrtinn P1u. £, retvrded 71 @U~k 91 at ['ages 1t)!3i$ thrnt:~n 1081@, records cf Ada Gvunty, Idahrr, 5ituatetlv7 a yu?'tlcn 4f thc~ Sk i/d nF Sectaun ~, Tflwtsshap S N1iKth,. Range 5'h'u5k, @Oise hPErisfiait.lik}'ttf hPrroir;~rs, A.da €oan#y, ldalxr, and laeir~ more parik412r1y dE54rihEd e5 tC*i(fd#;: C~a+mm~nrirp, at an alurnirvurn cnp rnunurnent rii5rk'Fil, 1t'ie 5i}utllE~35t t>;Stnrtr 4f ShcfJ'i+:ctinrr 3G, th+rncu aluc~ klee wrath lip u€ sad St7 tiara 3b,, f16~9"].9'~P3" l4' a dlSEarsn oS 31~t ~7 Feat i4 a pant, and'. tiierkvtg the R41P1T 6F ~EIN9NG; Thnre caMirwuin6 afat~ sad suutfi 5ni• *169°19'93'i4 a distatxe ofaF>7.€+i fk-xft to a brass csp monum:~ent nx~kint; fire >rautla 1f4 #t•+rnter Ui sakl 5c~atigel 3C+~ Theme Ir:dvirig.5ai~ v~utla Iine and alan6 khe ta!a;t Ilrw~ nF the S€1jA aF sa'sd Sei#h~r5 36, PtUFY2 /-'•P9`E a di;Glnie Ztf 5g;1.!?e{ igck to a print; Y?ierre leaning afd tarsi Ilne, 569'32'11` 8 v?tiidn4E of 2~,t74 tx+nf trs a faint ma:kir{{ tlx aliiaih~aeit rnrner riF 51prt1 Z•ed;7r S;yi'.~P;'SithclhAsltan Nu. ti; 'Fhnnto along saki 5ubiida=rin the Fblluvah!t7 tZrurSi'5; 565+'3[ it"E a dl5taocE a12?'3, P 3 fEe'1 to a paktr; i59';{s{L}t°k a dirtan4r? tsf ii12.~5 feet. to a paa~rt; S91'S3"13°4S' a dstanit: of 79.32 fekt tar ~ gainh: 531'16'19''N a tloti3:<'tc~ of14S.7R deft l+~ a:Etrr'A; 5'JU"28"7A°'h' a dFstmrnC*? crF 21i).aaa. frut to a priia rnarlang ftm su+Jtliea5t [urnEr raf said r"cdar Springs 5ubclitrcsiln Fiti. G; 'thence le&vkiy 58itf 5t~divisiart ec.md~} tiG~,iY'7n"aV a dlstancnnf ~@.fA7 heel to 9}ie F'41PdT ~rF 8€~INNt~7C+. -`raid paroEt ran7aint 5.52 aCrt3, rrb9re ar Ieue, arul g 3ohletT tt%all E:aisting rasernosits auit7iv rights-vf- wsy ut reward to irrrhlied. G~~Vf+1. ~rLt4~ ' ~~,~~ ts~; ~- 1~4# '~ 6 2~h1 th~~tba'~PN i~7~5sTti: ~(yftKa ENGS'sEEaS I StfP,'dEYgR~ I PtfUirlLh_• Past Eddy'sIZZ-13-006; CUP-13-006 PAGE 12 EXHIBIT A ?9.~7F' I' 18°i ~"µ' ~ ,~'' i-EG~Atf} _~ - ~.. ~ ra~,;e {~'r .ivusvLre. ~. - - ®= -~-sufvrm..i~isi c+aLtacnwr - - --SEr'i F7N ti#IF. - - -!d?1A~CNT lIGJkC'unT -. fi£-~i~tiL AREA ~. , t'~'. &'-~Il, unleGEGlld nrxyr ~.iG: era i~..a r.4 lizq a,s+Au sw~FT 1 ~F 1 ~:_° ~t'l6ryT {ic AC~E'IHIkG ~~ 8~ k7 ~~ ~ Plon Sr,~gi{: EKti l~! I>1 IS - 6tEZ~N~ Ft: R ST I~IVE~71L1EN 1 S f NC. ~NC,LUOES C~~{~R SPRINGS SiPBdIV5iO~ NG~. Fi S[TU.hTGt] It~i A t*£}RTittR~ [eF' TH G, 3E 1{4 QF yECTB~'a@136 ~- - T, !1 N., Fl. 1 4h8., 13i11.4P MER1dI~W, ~ITk' Df kJFRiLtIAN, ~iC~ ~t?4FNTk, IS7RI1tY Fast Eddy's RZ-13-006; COP-13-006 PAGE 13 EXHIBIT A D. Regcured Findings from Unified Development Code 1. Rezone Findings: Upon recommendation from the Commission, the Council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the pnblic hearing, review the application. In order to grant a rezone, the Council shall make the following findings: a. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; The City Council finds that the requested map amendment to C-C is generally consistent with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan noted above in Section VII. b. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds that the requested map amendment to the C-C zoning disL•ict is generally consistent with the purpose statement of the commercial districts in that it will provide for the retail and service needs of the community. c. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the pnblic health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds that the requested zoning amendment will not be detrimental to the pnblic health, safety, or welfare. The site is already serviced by City utilities and emergency service providers. d. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City including, but not limited to, school dishicts; and, The City Council finds that the requested zoning amendment will not result in any adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site. e. The annexation is in the best of interest of the City (UDC 11-SB-3.E). The City Council finds rezoning this property to C-C is in the best interest of the City as it is listed in the Comprehensive Plan as an appropriate zoning dishict in MU-C designated areas. 2. Conditional Use Permit (UDC 11-5B-6E) The Cmmnission shall base its determination mr the Conditional Use Permit request upon the following: a. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in whicL the use is located. The City Council finds that the subject property is large enough to accommodate the relocation of the proposed convenience store and comply with the dimensional & development re~ilafions of the C-C dish~ict (see Analysis Section IX for more information). b. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accord with the requirements of this Title. The City Council finds that the proposed use is consistent and harmonious with the UDC and Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designation of Industrial for this site. Note: the proposed use is a principally permitted use i~a the C-C distr•ic1,~ the CUP regz~est rs simply to Fasl Eddy's RZ-13-006; CUP-13-006 PAGE 14 EXHIBIT A ea-tend tlae busitaess hours of opw•atron ns disczrssecf in Section IX above. c. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. The City Council finds that if the applicant complies with the conditions outlined in this t•eport, the proposed use of the property should be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existuig and intended character of the area. d. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval unposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. The City Council finds that if the applicant complies with the conditions outlined in this report, the proposed use will not adversely affect other property in the area. e. That the proposed nse will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools, parks, police and fire protection, drainage structw•es, refuse disposal, water, and sewer. T'he City Council finds that sanitary sewer, domestic water, refuse disposal, and irrigation are currently provided to the subject property. The City Council finds that the proposed «se will be served adequately by all of the public facilities and services listed above. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the commwrity. If approved, the applicant will be financing any improvements required for development. The City Council finds there will not be excessive additional requirements at public cost and that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the community's economic welfare. g. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fames, glare m• odors. The City Council finds the proposed use will not be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare of the area. h. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. The City Council finds that there should not be any health, safety or environmental problems associated with the proposed use. Further, the City Council finds that the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of any nahu•al, scenic or historic feature of major importance. Fast Eddy's RZ-13-006; CUP-13-006 PAGE 8