The URL can be used to link to this page

Valeri Heights Subdivision AZ 00-006COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP Planner & Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman - Planning & Zoning TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian CITY COUNCIL, may we have your answer by: February 9, 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 1/27/94 HEARING DATE: 2/15/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning and Preliminary Plat for Valeri Heights BY: Vickie Welker and Hubble Engineering LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: East of Ten Mile Road and North of Pine Avenue JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON,C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIIDAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFF.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST (PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUR OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live WILLIAM k JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer CITY OF MERIDIAN MITH,P,JR.,CiEnginty GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT. Waste Water Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN IDAHO 83642 W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief , WAYNE G. GROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP Planner & Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman - Planning & Zoning TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian CITY COUNCIL, may we have your answer by: February 9, 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 1/27/94 HEARING DATE: 2/15/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning and Preliminary Plat for Valeri Heights BY: Vickie Welker and Hubble Engineering LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: East of Ten Mile Road and North of Pine Avenue JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON,C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIIDAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFF.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST (PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUR OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: f. Trees will be provided for ES Trees will be maintained_ l3`/ g. Sprinkler systems are provided for yC5 h. Are there multiple units IV Ci Type remarks i. Are there special set back requirements NO Explain j. Has off street parking been provided for Nth � Explain k. Value range of property $125o0o #, UP 1. Type of financing for development STA-NOARD M. Protective covenants were submitted .Date 16. Does the proposal land lock other property %/y Does it create Enclaves WO STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be constructed to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. 2. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 3. 4. 5. 6. Development will connect to City services. Development will comply with City Ordinances. Preliminary Plat will include all appropriate easements. Street names must not conflict with City grid system. (3) ENG1NF�9� HUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. 9550 Bethel Court ■ Boise, Idaho 83709 208/322-8992 ■ Fax 208/378-0329 SURVEProject No. 93-073 July 22, 1993 VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION A parcel of land located in the SW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 11, T.3N., R.1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the corner common to Sections 2, 3, 10, and 11, T.3N., RAW., B.M.; thence South 00000'05" West, 1328.42 feet to the North 1/16 corner; thence South 00000'04" East, 190.00 feet to a point; thence South 89020'17" East, 45.00 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING (INITIAL POINT). Thence continuing South 89020'17" East, 446.10 feet to a point in the center of Eightmile Lateral; thence along the centerline of Eightmile Lateral South 39°34'48" East, 408.84 feet to a point; thence 114.49 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 21052'00", and a long chord bearing South 50030'48" East, 113.80 feet to a point; thence South 61026'54" East, 9.02 feet to a point; thence departing said centerline South 80°16'00" West, 344.57 feet to a point; thence North 88001'37" West, 507.99 feet to a point on the section line common to said Sections 10 and 11; thence North 00000'04" West, 438.22 feet to a point; thence South 89020'17' East, 45.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 6.73 acres. DTP/bh/606.des Prepared By: HUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. i D. Terry Peugh, L.S. . rmil ,,C w kkk, PLOT SPY REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PRELIMINARY PLAT AND/OR FINAL PLAT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSION: A request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerks possession no later than three days following the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month the request was made. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:00 P.M., Thursday following the Planning and Zoning Commission, action. GENERAL INFORMATION 1, II 1. Name of Annexation and Subdivision, �IAL.Ei I-IE1GNTS SuC3D o51C 2. General Location, N W 'A 5F -c- 11 T 3M R I VJ 3. Owners of record, DE WA` M *k M u-L4L 5A i L,(= `j Address, I 180 N, T9H M)�-5' , ZiPS3(pgZ.Telephone riRB 293y 4. Applicant, VICK, WEL)z-E►2 Address, _F O PJox 5. Engineer, n-AMES C M _pYj FirmHUQ�T Address -'?F5-0 &74e7L, C7- 5&sc , Zi 8370 p_j_Telephone 32,2- 8992 6. Name and address to receive City billings: Name PrP?L.IC,4N T" Address Telephone PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres_ 6.7 2. Number of lots 6(A1LDA13LC 2ToTA L- 3. 3. Lots per acre .Z 3to LOTS/�,{Zt' 4. Density per acre Z,3(o 5. Zoning Classification (s ) F,Zory-'eb 2-� 13. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial Industrial or combination) R'51DeN?7AL, 14. Type of Dwelling(s) Single Family, Duplexes, otherMultiplexes, -3)N6LC , AA %, -4 15. Proposed Development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot(s), 0 5i= b• Minimum square footage of structures) "7LA C. Are garages provides for, __ X square footage LiOy d. Are other coverings provided for -NO e. Landscaping has been provided for X Describe EN, � KA N ,E I SLS N 1> S F&r,>tA 1(a ISN D XA t ,tel G tt>IL '0� c -,.,i (2) 6. If the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridian City Limits but within the jurisdictional mile, what is the existing zoning classification_ ADA CO- 2-T 7. Does the plat border a potential green belt b- _No Have recreational easements been provided for �Jp 9• Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City_ Explain 10. Are there proposed dedications of common areas. yL 5 Explain4nE21METF'f� V41yp7CA-Pt;, �t�t7y�Nft d�' 1N7C7210�2. )SL -N JS For future parks? Explain 11. What school(s) service the area Propose any agreements for future school sites t�10D you Explain 12. Other proposed amenities to the City X Water Supply PP Y X Fire Department SANLTM S �- � Other _ , Explain 13. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial Industrial or combination) R'51DeN?7AL, 14. Type of Dwelling(s) Single Family, Duplexes, otherMultiplexes, -3)N6LC , AA %, -4 15. Proposed Development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot(s), 0 5i= b• Minimum square footage of structures) "7LA C. Are garages provides for, __ X square footage LiOy d. Are other coverings provided for -NO e. Landscaping has been provided for X Describe EN, � KA N ,E I SLS N 1> S F&r,>tA 1(a ISN D XA t ,tel G tt>IL '0� c -,.,i (2) 903603' P101.A7 WARRANTY DEED FOR VALUE RECEIVED ELMER L. MERLE and MARGARET P. MERLE, husband and wife the Gramtom do b-eb7 fPi4 Wgaho. cell trod coewy into DeWAYNE BAILEY and MILLIE BAILEY, husband and wife the Gantem wbcmic dd m is 1180 NORTH TEN MIU ROAD ,MERIDIAN, ID 83642 the follower dearnbed prtmises, t01 jj: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BY REFERENCE: TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the call p—bim. a.0 theh appwte_,. =to the mt G.mss• thlb kln L d a..1rd fano. Asd St told Canton do hucbf taxaast m sad wid the tail G ,ccik that thcY re the tTrna, La fee simpk d raid pr� ttW aid premho ars fru from aII moat M r=apt fa neural rasa and _— ... fa rhe1490 +od V at'ae4u-d 7-1. m.ws+. cc -116-4 restitctdam sed ti..�..�. a( wood; 7� <}' W rit 6q arm � sad detmd the tuna tram s➢ I—W at. t_ t katsoem ...a71.- DATED`•June 28, 1990 t! TAWA!�PNGTON COUNTY OF' tv!•f s ��tr .u5.- -e1- On tNa i.( 0. u,j T ry lxfora AN • �+ • • rtot2ry PubUt PsrsonallY o Dpsarad B1H-31 L IEAit AND . -.. MARCAFtET P_ MEYME, known or Identmod to rno to be V,, Daraon(s) vAxXsa) minas) Fahr• subsalb*d to ew wlthln kvtrtrrnartt uW acknowiedpad to ms that hvshsr*y hairs aaaetRad the sans - ry Publle Rasldlny K.�1'✓n'[r _ wasNnptoll- My comrrtissAm attDifac OZ-ot lZ - ; PIONEER TITLE COMPANY = OF CANYON COUNTY c 100 IVR{ AV8�t1IT( - NAMPA, JDAlSO 13651 r 4" SOUTH A9s Csitay. ww- viii r ;ft�'4-+ _ _. CAID:t-E1I. ID 8J603 . c� TITLE 10 �'Y.. •�• .. t�,'e5pc OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk JANICE GASS, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR.. Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS. Fire Chief BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live COUNCILMEN CITY OF MERIDIAN RRONALD R. OBERTG SLERA 33 EAST IDAHO MAX ROBERT ROBERT 0. CORRIE MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Chairman Zoning a Planning Phone (208) 888-4433 JIM JOHNSON FAX (208) 887-48I3 Centennial Coordinator GRANT P. KINGSFORD PATSY FEDRIZZI Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian _d Z+�iri� r,�jl�siorL , may we have your answer by: !ZA,VS �T—� #7, t q q 3 TRANSMITTAL DATE29 9 'HEARING DATE: QC t6 17, tQ�i'3 1 REQUEST" ort, l�` t '' �[l Ai 11#q CCECUA ValerIL (-ki jk 5 S V1sion. BY: kit Al It WAW ke•r LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT:AIA C.6d JIM JOHNSON P/Z MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C 808 CORRIE, C/C 808 GIESLER, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER TV1 R f „` HERIMAN SCHOOL DI=STRICT `MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR'. DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO -.-(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) V.5- WEST ( PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: Sk clan A • 1-% TV1 R f „` HERIMAN SCHOOL DI=STRICT `MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR'. DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO -.-(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) V.5- WEST ( PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: FILE torr REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PRELIMINARY PLAT AND/OR FINAL PLAT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSION: A request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerks possession no later than three days following the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month the request was made. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:00 P.M., Thursday following the Planning and Zoning Commission action. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Annexation and Subdivision, VAL.El LC6HTS Su n/151oN 2. General Location, NW 'iy SE(:- 11 T 3N) R 1 Vel 3. Owners of record, 'Qe WA` M A M 1l.L.11' 5A i LC --'j Address, 1 ) 80 N, TEN Zipg36` 2-Telephone_�ft6 29,j(-) 4. Applicant, VICr0 WELAl-T-:;-►2 Address, F O P.,ox 5. Engineer, 0-AME5 C McRKLC- Firm Hue&L Fw-,)NEEe1NG Address 9550 x3E-774Et, c7-'861sc 'Zit)33701 Telephone 3ZZ- 892 9 P _ P 6. Name and address to receive City billings: Name APPLlCAriT- Address Telephone PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres (o,-7-7 2. Number of lots I% 13UILDAaLE Z I ToTA L- 3. 3. Lots per acre Z,-36 L0T1/jC,{Z(' 4. Density per acre 2136, 5. Zoning Classif ication ( s ) Qi2oPU5Eb 2�� 6. If the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridian City Limits but within the jurisdictional mile, what is the existing zoning classification_ DA Co (Z _ 1 7. Does the plat border a potential green belt NC) a. Have recreational easements been provided for Mo 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City_ Explain 10. Are there proposed dedications of common areas? /L S Explain &kimm-Eg- LAi ic>e, Pe', CmTaANGe b� 1�t 15LA-N 05 For future parks? Explain 11. What school (s) service the area do you propose any agreements for future school sites Explain 12. Other proposed amenities to the City X Water Supply X Fire Department SA -I JJVL7 E`(L_ ERCT , Other Explain 13. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial or combination) 1?1:-:::51DE74-'A L- 14. 14. Type of Dwelling(s) Single Family, Duplexes, Multiplexes, other gIN6C-- F --"L J 15. Proposed Development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot(s), E3000 5P b. Minimum square footage of structure(s)pE(Z, nRDin�ArJC,� C. Are garages provides for,Com_square footage LiQQ d. Are other coverings provided for N0 e. Landscaping has been provided for X—, Describe 'Ve_)t EEZ 4-E.Wi 2.ANC,E 15LAN25 C,DVCTIAA-r—J-S 1ZEDuJ2% LA) -4 D 5CAt?11-1 G (2) f. Trees will be provided for ES Trees will be maintained 5y g. Sprinkler systems are provided for %CS h. Are there multiple units NO P Type remarks i. Are there special set back requirements No Explain j. Has off street parking been provided for NU , Explain k. Value range of property $1I'S O00 4, UP 1. Type of financing for development STA-Nt�ARD M. Protective covenants were submitted .Date 16. Does the proposal land lock other property NO Does it create Enclaves No STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be constructed to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. 2. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 3. 4. J. 6. Development will connect to City services. Development will comply with City Ordinances. Preliminary Plat will include all appropriate easements. Street names must not conflict with City grid system. (3) AUG -11-19K 15: FF'ON C]T) OF HER]DIAtA TO 3f -dc- F.OZ APPLIATION FOR ANNEXATION APPROVAL & ZONING OR REZONE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FILING INFORMATION I. GENERAL INFORMATION V -4L -c-:21 4E164Ts svP.>Di v 15)0N (PROPOSED NAME OF SUBDIVISION) NW')Li 5EG_1 �._ T'. 3N p- I w (GENERAL LOCATION) 5s -r-- tYTT-A cE} E70 (LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ATTACH IF LENGTHY) De w&`INL M t i3AtL��. y I .�o-7. Da (OWNER(S) OF RECORD) (NAME) (TELEPHONE NO.) I I s0 NL (ADDRESS) V I C14-1 W G t-�-c (APPLICANT) (NAME) (TELEPHONE NO.) Fo Box 888 M�-)DIAD 4 83G 8 0 (ADDRESS) HU(3(3Le 1.t461Ntt IzIN)G 32Z- b 9Cl 72 - (ENGINEER, (ENGINEER, SURVEYOR OR PLANNER) (NAME) (TELEPHONE NO.) 85570 i3E-TH>✓L. C-1 -Bo)sE )D 83709 (ADDRESS) C,' l T -f c� F N1 IE2 I -D I'A N (JURISDICTION(S) REQUIRING APPROVAL) YC s I D E: -r A L - (TYPE OF SUBDIVISION - RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL) +50 '0. -7 ACRES OF LAND IN CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP. (ACCEPTED BY:) (FEE) June 1, 1993 ANNEXATION TEN MILE ROAD A tract of land in the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 11, T.3N., R.1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the section corner common to Sections 2, 3, 10 and 11, T.3N., RAW., B.M., thence South along the section line common to Sections 10 and 11, 1328.37 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 89°20' East along the North boundary of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 11, 332.03 feet to a point on the approximate centerline of a certain canal; thence South 40°04'40" East along said centerline, 716.11 feet to a point; thence South 5845'30" East along said centerline, 67.90 feet to a point; thence South 8014'50" West, 348.42 feet to a steel pin; thence North 88000' West on a line between two certain ditches, 508.04 feet to a point on the section line common to said Sections 10 and 11; thence North along said section line, 628.32 feet to the Real Point of Beginning. 557.des J P .. � •� -• \+� /�� •rte', r� ,s- I• II MJ ZIAJ w.:. C(�- 1 �O I it i. Gdia--�� I i �.,..�`HUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. 9550 Bethel Court ■ Boise, Idaho 83709 208/322-8992 ■ Fax 208/378-0329 June 1, 1993 Mr. Wayne Forrey City Clerk City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Annexation and Zoning 8.57 Acres East side of Ten Mile about 1300' South of Ustick Proposed Valeri Heights Subdivision Dear Mr. Forrey: On behalf of Vicki Welker, we hereby request that the property described in the attached application and legal descriptions be annexed into the City of Meridian. The present land use is pasture and farmland with a residence. The proposed land use for the entire property will be single family residential The present zoning is R -T (Rural Transitional) in Ada County. The proposed zoning is R-4 in the City of Meridian. The property is directly south and adjacent to the corporation limits of the City of Meridian and existing R-4 zoning. It will be desirable to extend this existing land use to the subject parcel. The proposed annexation and zoning complies with the existing Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, we are requesting approval for the proposed subdivision preliminary plat. The proposed subdivision contains 16 building lots designated for single-family development. The proposed subdivision will contain landscaping adjacent to Ten Mile Road. New sanitary sewer and domestic water mains will be extended to serve this development. The streets are proposed as public streets. The lots will meet the square footage requirements as stated by ordinance. Mr. Wayne Forrey June 1, 1993 Page Two Also please note that the length of the east -west cul-de-sac is approximately 490 feet from the centerline of Ten Mile Road; however, the divided entry and extra width should allow sufficient access for emergency vehicles. We would request that the City allow this extra length in this case due to the geometry of the property. Thank you for your time and consideration. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, James Merkle, P.E. JCM/bh/222.ltr cc: Vicki Welker PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300' OF VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION Stonehouse Evangelical Corporation 1450 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642-5404 Rex L. and Elma Narrison 1300 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 David S. and Shirley A. Fuller 890 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 Ben B. and Norma J. Jepson 2078 Lasher Court Meridian, ID 83642 Coe J. Parker 2930 W. Pine Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 Ler and Fae M. Stucker Trust L. R. and F. M. Stucker, Trustees 2695 W. Cherry Lane Meridian, ID 83642 James W. and Lois J. Fuller 1635 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 Alford E. and Maurren Massengale 1115 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 Gary W. and Cheryl L. Lamunyon 1025 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 Betty J. Mosher 895 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 /rpt. I Ai l C �r I e� rrf �!s Fl: mw:lsl;c ��t��"-r'lrrt �- --/' til Y • 1 . j -`fir Ll.. � r r :L n 7 9036033 WARRANTY DEED L. MERLE and MARCARLT P. MERLE, FOR VALUE RECEIVED ELMER husband t, Os BAILEY, and toft' do husband wife ba=by Va0 and bupla• wife mZ and =a -y Coto DeWAYNE BAILEY and MILLIE Qu C4=t..j, ibe foUowkg SEE EXHIBIT whom addma dcam-t-c-d premises, "A" is 1180 ATTACHED NORTH to- iL TEN HZRZTO WU ROAD AND , MERIDIAN, MADE A ID PART 83642 HEREOF By REFERENCE: kh and JXxt TO HAVE AND TO HOLD tM Or.-% umb -p f—a. Aad 6-t MW OrAwm do WcbY o -"m W and wild Q me " raeLcm mx t re Lke o Jor U.. -d --u lot We r- 1990 ted F.-'.= DY said ftta.LarJ m c..v"m& o_djw.�6 and &d 6ty wm -.a b- _d from rcd�d def=d mare -d do a.ma b- r-1 of �4; -2 data wkaraot�ee DATED: June 28, 1990 C ARET P. KEJtLZ ELKER-4,r-MERLE COUNTY OP iii On tN* ',d my CO appeared El ::V WER L WDILE AND notary pubac, personally MARGARET P. hSOU4 known or ld*mVfl*d to m to be the pe,—(s) -"-) -n*s) Wart subscribed to the wlttim Uutrwntrt and scknoi"ged to rnl t"t h&'%h&dWY have execLud the asms. Wra,y Plub60 FWW'Ang st/o-^k� -asNmgton My �nllxson expirz PIONEER TITLE COMPANY OF CANYON COUNTY 4M SOUTH IUWMALL 100 AVE SOUTH WW- NAMPA. ZDAHO 001 A*& CV046 CALDN IL ID TTn r LIL- ��t��"-r'lrrt �- --/' Y • 1 . j -`fir Ll.. � r r :L n 7 COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERT GIESLER MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning & Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian I lain tq IF 3, may we have your answer L :' I 9�oc rl. A? 3 TRANSMITTAL_ DATE: HEARING DATE: Qr46A 12-d-�-7 3 REQUEST: r M CAW ValtrL am LOCATION JIM JOHNSON P/Z MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z JIM SHEARER P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT :............ CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C BOB GIESLER, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER C0 ,(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) il.S. WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ~ HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live OFFICIALS S. FORREY, CITY OF MERIDIAN GASS,TeasureP,CilyClerk JANICE GASS, Treasurer JAICE BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR.. Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief Phone (208) 888-4433 BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERT GIESLER MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning & Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian I lain tq IF 3, may we have your answer L :' I 9�oc rl. A? 3 TRANSMITTAL_ DATE: HEARING DATE: Qr46A 12-d-�-7 3 REQUEST: r M CAW ValtrL am LOCATION JIM JOHNSON P/Z MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z JIM SHEARER P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT :............ CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C BOB GIESLER, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER C0 ,(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) il.S. WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: Post -It' -and fax transmittal memo 7671 #of pages ► To✓�� C Fro Dept. (Phone # 33LR —739 ! Fax REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PRELIMINARY PLAT AND/OR FINAL PLAT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSION: A request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerks possession no later than three days following the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month the request was made. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:00 P.M., Thursday following the Planning and Zoning Commission action. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Annexation and Subdivision, VALE l 1-126HTS SuMV151oN 2. General Location, NW '%1 SEG 11 13N) IV 3. Owners of record, DeWAJM A M )L—L-1 5A t LC-_ 7 Address, 1 18o N. Tr -N Zip836y2-Telephone 4. Applicant, VICKI WEL1�k Address, F O ;3ox 5. Engineer, Q'_AMES C ME►RKLCC Firm E-Il.le&rl fa G NEEgft Address 9550 RWIPE, C -r Sas& , Zip`337o Telephone 3Z2- 8992 6. Name and address to receive City billings: Name APPL.ICAt' r Address Telephone PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres 6.7 2. Number of lots Jho f3ttlLD-A3LE Z I To TA L 3. Lots per acre Z , L0TS(AZ lz 4. Density per acre (v 5. Zoning Classification(s) Fzpro'ksb "y f. Trees will be provided for ES Trees will be maintained T3y g. Sprinkler systems are provided for h. Are there multiple units lVy Type remarks i. Are there special set back requirements No Explain j. Has off street parking been provided for NO ,Explain k. Value range of property 12.5000 0, UP 1. Type of financing for development STA-NDARD M. Protective covenants were submitted .Date 16. Does the proposal land lock other property N 0 Does it create Enclaves N STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be constructed to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. 2. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 3. 4. J. 6. Development will connect to City services. Development will comply with City Ordinances. Preliminary Plat will include all appropriate easements. Street names must not conflict with City grid system. (3) 6. If the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridian City Limits but within the jurisdictional mile, what is the existing zoning classification ADA GO_ 2 - I 7. Does the plat border a potential green belt No b. Have recreational easements been provided for �JQ 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City NO Explain 10. Are there proposed dedications of common areas? /L 5 Explain PbzjMETPF(L LAI`lDS Pt✓} Lt�47Yah"Gt 3} INI�i2lcY2, jSI,A N JS For future parks? Explain 11. What school(s) service the area NE2101AN , do you propose any agreements for future school sites t�10 Explain 12. Other proposed amenities to the City Water Supply X Fire Department SAIJJA(L7 SE�1ER EaCT Other _ Explain 13. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial or combination) 1?i�SiDe!4TAL- 14. Type of Dwelling(s) Single Family, Duplexes, Multiplexes, other `31116 T--, IMJ 15. Proposed Development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot(s), e©d0 St= b. Minimum square footage of structures)?E(Z. nRdiNANC� C. Are garages provides for, X square footage `tOO Se. d. Are other coverings provided for NO e. Landscaping has been provided for X , Describe ` mac -MUTER 4- Et-ri-2ANGS- bQa4AA)T-s RZou1(P-'� Lt�N D 5C. Pl-A G -t—bX �: A c b� 'f3�-t�C L6 -1- (2) -o 1 . (2) ') HUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. 9550 Bethel Court ■ Boise, Idaho 83709 June 1, 1993 Mr. Wayne Forrey City Clerk City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 208/322-8992 ■ Fax 208/378-0329 RE: Annexation and Zoning 8.57 Acres East side of Ten Mile about 1300' South of Ustick Proposed Valeri Heights Subdivision Dear Mr. Forrey: On behalf of Vicki Welker, we hereby request that the property described in the attached application and legal descriptions be annexed into the City of Meridian. The present land use is pasture and farmland with a residence. The proposed land use for the entire property will be single family residential The present zoning is R -T (Rural Transitional) in Ada County. The proposed zoning is R-4 in the City of Meridian. The property is directly south and adjacent to the corporation limits of the City of Meridian and existing R-4 zoning. It will be desirable to extend this existing land use to the subject parcel. The proposed annexation and zoning complies with the existing Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, we are requesting approval for the proposed subdivision preliminary plat. The proposed subdivision contains 16 building lots designated for single-family development. The proposed subdivision will contain landscaping adjacent to Ten Mile Road. New sanitary sewer and domestic water mains will be extended to serve this development. The streets are proposed as public streets. The lots will meet the square footage requirements as stated by ordinance. Mr. Wayne Forrey June 1, 1993 Page Two Also please note that the length of the east -west cul-de-sac is approximately 490 feet from the centerline of Ten Mile Road; however, the divided entry and extra width should allow sufficient access for emergency vehicles. We would request that the City allow this extra length in this case due to the geometry of the property. Thank you for your time and consideration. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, James Merkle, P.E. JCM/bh/222.ltr cc: Vicki Welker 7 �aa �VAF e. tL 9036033 WARRANTY DEED FOR VALUE RECEIVED -D ELMER L. MERLE and MARGARET P. MERLE, husband and wife the Gnaws da h_by gas b-gilrk. =n and = y Icto DeWAYNE BAILEY and MILLI? BAILEY, husband and wife thu C_tj, whose d&_ is 1180 NORTH TE24 MILE ROAD MERIDIAN, ID 83642 the 'oUowict 6cscnbCd praniscJ, 1-' il: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BY REFERENCE: ;s TO HAVE AND TO HOLD 'I- LLW F-LhM -PP— mm the aajd h kL f.,.. Ad 6. W O,a do Wby m.— n -4 "Ek the " r—'M "�y - tie In fee --pk -(-d _W from U I- r-9 taxa sed —. k Lk Y- 1990 -A r j, ,—nu, c -dim-, mudcd— -6 cat<scaa .1 t d; _d " de, M w -.m -d &cf-d 6. wta DATED: June 28, 1990 tz LME ER.LE ARET P. MERLE -T-TTIVWA:!��N cou On &d . of notary pub0G pd��ly appeared ELhIM L blERLE AND W,kp,,_AFtET P. mERLF known m tdonthl*d to nm to bo the pqrSon(g) W"") m*S) J&ogrg subsw1bod tD the VdViM "trumort and &cV4wi#dg&d to mo "t 5., *.ecLA*d the 26m& my ftblio FW*Jdln at wasNngton PIONEER T= COMTANY OF CANYON COUNTY 100 •LOTH ANT SOUTH Wh. 0-1 4= SOUTH lul.� ;le. KkMP& IDAHO ANSIAl* 071111 CALDAlll. W v6c3.`,A mu 0;41 n :c. . Ay��Ff Y ~fix._ 7 �aa �VAF e. tL 9036033 WARRANTY DEED FOR VALUE RECEIVED -D ELMER L. MERLE and MARGARET P. MERLE, husband and wife the Gnaws da h_by gas b-gilrk. =n and = y Icto DeWAYNE BAILEY and MILLI? BAILEY, husband and wife thu C_tj, whose d&_ is 1180 NORTH TE24 MILE ROAD MERIDIAN, ID 83642 the 'oUowict 6cscnbCd praniscJ, 1-' il: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BY REFERENCE: ;s TO HAVE AND TO HOLD 'I- LLW F-LhM -PP— mm the aajd h kL f.,.. Ad 6. W O,a do Wby m.— n -4 "Ek the " r—'M "�y - tie In fee --pk -(-d _W from U I- r-9 taxa sed —. k Lk Y- 1990 -A r j, ,—nu, c -dim-, mudcd— -6 cat<scaa .1 t d; _d " de, M w -.m -d &cf-d 6. wta DATED: June 28, 1990 tz LME ER.LE ARET P. MERLE -T-TTIVWA:!��N cou On &d . of notary pub0G pd��ly appeared ELhIM L blERLE AND W,kp,,_AFtET P. mERLF known m tdonthl*d to nm to bo the pqrSon(g) W"") m*S) J&ogrg subsw1bod tD the VdViM "trumort and &cV4wi#dg&d to mo "t 5., *.ecLA*d the 26m& my ftblio FW*Jdln at wasNngton PIONEER T= COMTANY OF CANYON COUNTY 100 •LOTH ANT SOUTH Wh. 0-1 4= SOUTH lul.� ;le. KkMP& IDAHO ANSIAl* 071111 CALDAlll. W v6c3.`,A mu 0;41 n :c. . /ENGI/y 920 C") S U R V �yOQ HUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. 9550 Bethel Court ■ Boise, Idaho 83709 June 1, 1993 Mr. Wayne Forrey City Clerk City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 208/322-8992 ■ Fax 208/378-0329 RE: Annexation and Zoning 8.57 Acres East side of Ten Mile about 1300' South of Ustick Proposed Valeri Heights Subdivision Dear Mr. Forrey: On behalf of Vicki Welker, we hereby request that the property described in the attached application and legal descriptions be annexed into the City of Meridian. The present land use is pasture and farmland with a residence. The proposed land use for the entire property will be single family residential The present zoning is R -T (Rural Transitional) in Ada County. The proposed zoning is R-4 in the City of Meridian. The property is directly south and adjacent to the corporation limits of the City of Meridian and existing R-4 zoning. It will be desirable to extend this existing land use to the subject parcel. The proposed annexation and zoning complies with the existing Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, we are requesting approval for the proposed subdivision preliminary plat. The proposed subdivision contains 16 building lots designated for single-family development. The proposed subdivision will contain landscaping adjacent to Ten Mile Road. New sanitary sewer and domestic water mains will be extended to serve this development. The streets are proposed as public streets. The lots will meet the square footage requirements as stated by ordinance. 4 n Mr. Wayne Forret' June 1, 1993 Page Two Also please note that the length of the east -west cul-de-sac is approximately 490 feet from the centerline of Ten Mile Road; however, the divided entry and extra width should allow sufficient access for emergency vehicles. We would request that the City allow this extra length in this case due to the geometry of the property. Thank you for your time and consideration. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, James Merkle, P.E. JCM/bh/222.ltr cc: Vicki Welker / )a `- 9036033 wARRANTY DEED FOR VALUE RECFVED £LMER L. MERLE and MARGARET P. MERLE, husband and wife the Gaowa, de bQ�T mss, t,.ujafc, 5e2 and _ysolo DeWAYNL BAILEY and MI LLZL BAILEY, husband and wife the OrantuY, wboac addim is 1180 NORTH TEN MILE ROAD ,MERIDIAN, ID 83642 the foLowing dnrnbcd prcmiscs, to- it: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF DY REFERENCE: ry TO HAVE AND TO HOLD d- s.ld pr -6m -ib 6ch epµtncuncss mm tke .1 Gaesu; tktlt ►ern rad assist fueva. Aad tke " Cx a do le.rebT sir m and "4A W " Gms :k tLs t6e7 rt Ue swoons i. fee .Fl, d —4 pcmLq t1W raid Pcmfso art fru tam Z aamt:aa'r; tscP fa 3m—j tun sed iv the y— ]990 and ytscauer Yc+'>` enYca+nu, cxdld..'L. rrsakdota and ry.,-...r. of mod; sed t$..< &" wM scar asd defod 6a a.ma b— aL Le•tul claims .•irsoertc DATED:_June 28, 1990 (\ , �7 RARET P MERLE ELME ERLE / TA , .NGtom = COUNTY or! Lii 3 of tat iQ day of /� ts4o, beton eta a notary public. personally appeared BALER L IERLE AND WRCAftET P. blEFL , known or IdentMed to ew to be the _ x pertwnlh vA*s) Nm•(s) Ia'are subscribed Is the rlWn Irtsburnert and acknowledged to ma that h%'shfhlfry flava executed the stone ry Hrbtla _ _ `.- slding st ZoJ ^kr. Watlington +t` MT conunlsaion 9x*lC OL-OFfz • w y �\ � PIONEER TTI1.E COMPANY OF CANYON COUNTY av soLtlx IOntsAti yy YJ. ,i 100 H TH AVE 90MH Cr .1 • lfrtr• CaLDtsT11. ID 93GO.S p •fiMTTA MAW 001 19aE p eL "fr" T ' r -- n /'1 NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 P.M., on October 12, 1993, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of Vicki Welker, for annexation and zoning of approximately 6.77 acres of land located in the Northwest 1/4, Section 11, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise -Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and which property is generally located on Ten Mile Road North of Pine Road. That the application requests annexation with zoning of R-4. Further Applicant requests Preliminary Plat approval of the parcel of land above described for 16 single family dwelling lots for Valeri Heights Subdivision. A more particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Dated this 21 day of �2�eh--�� , 1993. WILL BERG, CIT CLERK (-P PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300'OF VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION Stonehouse Evangelical Corporation 1450 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642-5404 Rex L. and Elma Narrison 1300 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 David S. and Shirley A. Fuller 890 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 Ben B. and Norma J. Jepson 2078 Lasher Court Meridian, ID 83642 Coe J. Parker 2930 W. Pine Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 Ler and Fae M. Stucker Trust L. R. and F. M. Stucker, Trustees 2695 W. Cherry Lane Meridian, ID 83642 James W. and Lois J. Fuller 1635 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 Alford E. and Maurren Massengale 1115 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 Gary W. and Cheryl L. Lamunyon 1025 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 Betty J. Mosher 895 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 /rpt. 9036033 WARRANTY DEED FOR VALUE RECEIVED ELMER L. MERLE and MARGARET P. MERLE, husband and wife the Otanton. do heteby grao4 buph4 w9 and coosvy tufo DeWAYNE BAILEY and MILLIE ter" BAILEY, husband and wife the Grsmeea, whose ad&en is 1180 NORTH TEN MILE ROAD ,MERIDIAN, ID 83642 the following daaibed premises. to—wit: SEE EXHIBIT ^A^ ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BY 7 REFERENCES 70 HAVE AND TO 1101D the said premise; whk their apputeasxe moo the 2 GnEtees. theh hobs and nips foe = Ad the said Ouewn do busby oo•eeut ae asd -kb the said 01vetees, thr then M the -ween is fee aimple a' aald p udwK for saw pemise an flee ham a0 coaxo6osmc asp for geaetal taxes ad mnamtm fn the year 1990 OW = , wtbegoer yce,%, taovesue, oodkbn, an"oes ed ea>mers of nmd; r' r ad dad fief win wamet sod delved dr sans f o all lawkd dales wtuaoewa DATED: June 28, 1990 ELMER—Lr-MERLE! e+n+a�saaaar.• t.r-P2 Via..{ / _lt=.t ft On tNs iw dry of: /y 1tlgq lefon me • notary public. ply appeared BJMR L MEM E AND MARGARET P.1Ein-E. known or identified to an to he the person(q who(-) tuttae(s) Were subscribed to the wiWn Instrument rad r:knowiedged to me VaN heishaVaey have executed the swanWyaLP 4. Fryy ry Public elUfp atZ/YI1li": waahlllptell " a; .fix My rntnnalaalon ottpYesS, s . �".• PIONEERlTTIT-E COMPANY OF CANYON COUNTY _ t'100 1dIHAVB>101111[ = a4b 801y1H �4.NAMiA.IDiAf10 t1bS1 {a l� �.:: AftGVAX Maes CA1D*Ml.ID IM Cj '�11LCA TME i A TRACT OF LAND IN TMi iOUTHWZBT OUApTER OF THE NORTHWEST OUARTER Oe SECTION 11, TOWNOHIP 3 NORTH, RAHOS 1 NEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, MORB PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWSt _• f 4 __e� a - �'x ft COMMENCING AT THA 5WT10N CORN8II=COMMON'TO SECTIONS 2, 3,' 10 AND 11, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH RANOZ 1 WZSTA,8=19,:HERIDIAN,.:TBZNCE �3= SOUTH ALONG THE 6iCT�ON LINZ::CONmON�S ECTIONS 10 -AND 11 IN2i{ y r' �s; iy►, 1328.37 FEET TO THi'REAwPO�EGINNINGt• THENCE SOUTH 89.20. EAST ALONG THE NORTH BOiA4DARY''OT=THS SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THR NORTHWEST OUARTZR OF SAID SECTION 11, 332.03 FEET TO A POINT OR THE APPROXIM 2Zi.CEHTERLINE OT A CERTAIN :a CANAL; THENP6 - 'i•;' r o r L ';+t "•. SOUTH 40.04' d0• iAi* ALONG SAID, CEIlTlR6iNl� 716.11 FEET TO POINT; THENC$ SOUTH 58.45'30• ZA117 ALONG SAID CEN3INUHZ, 67.90 FEET TO A POINT THENCR SOUTH 80.14 50" W66T, 348, 42 FEET TO'ik ATEZL' A1Nt TltENCZ + *fix NORTH 88'00' WEST ON A LINE BETWEEN:M:;CERTAINR DITCHES. 308:04 � ' F FEET TO A POINT ON TNR SE3ii.I.Ew TO SAID ¢ECTI 10 AND Ili' TNINOi•. w NORTH ALONG SAID piOTZON L2Ni, Z rRlJ L pp;iN7� BEGINNING.ix IS wG k as i Cl) H +1 H m It CD Q) p F a a-1 al Q r -I in ir co = m m � LL m O m "- 7 W m Ow Q• NLL C Q m tp m Q cc m mEm a: r a o0 o C mU0 NO ` a U m m� O a•� p— 4) C 0 a - W >> a� yy� •��" O ctl i- �n�5a^mo a d��°yam m _ U cc ^ c c a'�•o � ^ L k t- ro0.�'L O L a Z cr W H v cc 0.0LU 3 o, F °p } an / w +/ LU H iLJ L) W LU m CL y W (n g O F- LL 0 CL h m m U m: �0 oF6 0 �a Z m m 0 U Om 1- Q: N m a O.�2 � J N N N (n 1 O Z v zCOW Q W O `V co �J C W W � fA M ti z 00 Z co M d' tn 00 00 m v Q H 2i (ON 'IIVW SS3?IdX9 (I V `9SIGNVHDS91N Hod .I.d,gDgd NHfllad `QdIdliHFID'Q9?If1SPIi N Q q a 4-) H `CTawarcrn -- -- +� ca Cl) `` o ro p a ,r -i E ro O a o •11 W o m co0 U O Ei ro G rr-f O (n r� Ul Q) H co P4 m Ca -H z 10 HH D w ro co CIO ro :~ N o N m coEa W p o ro w b p U a ca Z .0 '� ro 'b r~ .� ro ro b o r~ ao c° � ro p ca m � ca O x >q N O 5 4 -Ji% Q U a ) cl r W >> a� yy� •��" O ctl i- �n�5a^mo a d��°yam m _ U cc ^ c c a'�•o � ^ L k t- ro0.�'L O L a Z cr W H v cc 0.0LU 3 o, F °p } an / w +/ LU H iLJ L) W LU m CL y W (n g O F- LL 0 CL h m m U m: �0 oF6 0 �a Z m m 0 U Om 1- Q: N m a O.�2 � J (n 1 O Z v zCOW Q W O `V co �J C W W � fA Z M d' tn 00 (ON 'IIVW SS3?IdX9 (I V `9SIGNVHDS91N Hod .I.d,gDgd NHfllad `QdIdliHFID'Q9?If1SPIi `CTawarcrn -- -- W >> a� yy� •��" O ctl i- �n�5a^mo a d��°yam m _ U cc ^ c c a'�•o � ^ L k t- ro0.�'L O L a Z cr W H v cc 0.0LU 3 o, F °p } an / w +/ LU H iLJ L) W LU m CL y W (n g O F- LL 0 CL h m m U m: �0 oF6 0 �a Z m m 0 U Om 1- Q: N m a O.�2 � J REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PRELIMINARY PLAT AND/OR FINAL PLAT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSIDN: A request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerks possession no later than three days following the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month the request was made. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:00 P.M., Thursday following the Planning and Zoning Commission action. GENERAL INFORMATION 1/ 1. Name of Annexation and Subdivision, yAL.El I-IC16HTS Sumyi5l0� 2. General Location,NW )%y SEC- 11 T 3N) R I Vf 3. Owners of record, 1` E WA JM eE M )L—L-5 BA 1 L_C= % Address, ( 180 N, T9H Zip836`12-Telephone PR8 2930 4. Applicant, VICK► WEL-jL:E✓L Address, F O fox 5. Engineer, SAMF5 C M 12KLC- Firm Hua&,cr EN&NEEP-1N� Address 9650 06-7-/E�L CT'8o'5E , Zipg Telephone 32,2-8992. 6. Name and address to receive City billings: Name APPLicAt,4.T' Address Telephone PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres (0,7% 2. Number of lots I(v 5QJUD ! LC 2 ToTA L- 3. 3. Lots per acre Z , 36 LOT5/4C47-t' 4. Density per acre Z"3(o 5. Zoning Classification ( s) _Pi2oPUS'Eb �� 6. If the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridian City Limits but within the jurisdictional mile, what is the existing zoning classification—ADA CO (Z 7. Does the plat border a potential green belt NO b. Have recreational easements been provided for �Jo 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City NO Explain �! 10. Are there proposed dedications of common areas? /L S ExplainLANC6 JSP t,--3 C ATYtAwE d� 1Nit-�2�A2� f 5LA-N 0S For future parks? Explain 11. What school(s) service the area hjE12-UiANdo you propose any agreements for future school sites No Explain 12. Other proposed amenities to the City )< Water Supply Fire Department SAttJJ6d Y 5ewE2- EXT. P Other Explain 13. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial or combination) iD04TAL, 14. Type of Dwelling(s) Single Family, Duplexes, Multiplexes, other `31"6LL-T. I (J, 15. Proposed Development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot(s), 8000 5P b. Minimum square footage of structure(s)pE(Z. nRoi��ArJC C. Are garages provides for, X square footageLjoy S� d. Are other coverings provided for NO e. Landscaping has been provided for X , Describe `f ac es ER- *- � _P -A N c,E I SLAI-4) s D Q0q J -J -s F&Z;�u , 2� 1-1 ND5C ►"r-16 tom- -t-�k c+I bwG, Loi . (2) f. Trees will be provided for Trees will be maintained_`/ g. Sprinkler systems are provided for %C s h. Are there multiple units_ lVy Type remarks i. Are there special set back requirements_ No Explain j. Has off street parking been provided for NU , Explain k. Value range of property 115000 #' up 1. Type of financing for development STA -Nr ARD M. Protective covenants were submitted .Date 16. Does the proposal land lock other property N0 Does it create Enclaves STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be constructed to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. 2. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 3. 4. J. 6. Development will connect to City services. Development will comply with City Ordinances. Preliminary Plat will include all appropriate easements. Street names must not conflict with City grid system. 43) Fk G-11-1942 is:?' FRD"1 CIT) OF h1ER1PIR4 TO 3780329 P.02 �o-7oa APPLIATION FOR ANNEXATION APPROVAL & ZONING OR REZONE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FILING INFORMATION I. GENERAL INFORMATION (PROPOSED NA14E OF SUBDIVISION) Nw VLi 51✓ L_1 I.. T-. 31-4 w (GENERAL LOCATION) Svr-- ?'k-TrA C- } i�:-o Lz-6-#, L (LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ATTACH IF LENGTHY) DEyyA,`lNiE MILl-I.LC i3A-«C--% 888 z93o (OWNER(S) OF RECORD) (NAME) (TELEPHONE N0.) ) 1 �3 0 Nl, TSN I� i (ADDRESS) V I S t'e- � w G Lac f2--- (APPLICANT) Z(APPLICANT) (NAME) 8885&oo (TELEPHONE NO.) Fo B0x 888 M 1D1A 368 0 (ADDRESS) fU t3 B t,:e LN61NtE-2/zI mG (ENGINEER, SURVEYOR OR PLANNER) (NAME) 32z- �94-2- (TELEPHONE NO. X95-0 i3 �� Ga T3o�s )fJ 83709 (ADDRESS) (2,1 T \-f c)F MIE 21-)�>I,AN (JURISDICTION(S) REQUIRING APPROVAL) TESI DENTtA L - (TYPE OF SUBDIVISION - RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL) +50 1&•5 ACRES OF LAND IN CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP. (ACCEPTED BY:) (FEE) ENG!4 HUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. \9 �� 9550 Bethel Court ■ Boise, Idaho 83709 208/322-8992 ■ Fax 208/378-0329 SURV June 1, 1993 Mr. Wayne Forrey City Clerk City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Annexation and Zoning 8.57 Acres East side of Ten Mile about 1300' South of Ustick Proposed Valeri Heights Subdivision Dear Mr. Forrey: On behalf of Vicki Welker, we hereby request that the property described in the attached application and legal descriptions be annexed into the City of Meridian. The present land use is pasture and farmland with a residence. The proposed land use for the entire property will be single family residential The present zoning is R -T (Rural Transitional) in Ada County. The proposed zoning is R-4 in the City of Meridian. The property is directly south and adjacent to the corporation limits of the City of Meridian and existing R-4 zoning. It will be desirable to extend this existing land use to the subject parcel. The proposed annexation and zoning complies with the existing Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, we are requesting approval for the proposed subdivision preliminary plat. The proposed subdivision contains 16 building lots designated for single-family development. The proposed subdivision will contain landscaping adjacent to Ten Mile Road. New sanitary sewer and domestic water mains will be extended to serve this development. The streets are proposed as public streets. The lots will meet the square footage requirements as stated by ordinance. Mr. Wayne Forrey June 1, 1993 Page Two Also please note that the length of the east -west cul-de-sac is approximately 490 feet from the centerline of Ten Mile Road; however, the divided entry and extra width should allow sufficient access for emergency vehicles. We would request that the City allow this extra length in this case due to the geometry of the property. Thank you for your time and consideration. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, James Merkle, P.E. JCM/bh/222.ltr cc: Vicki Welker PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300' OF VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION Stonehouse Evangelical Corporation 1450 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642-5404 Rex L. and Elma Narrison 1300 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 David S. and Shirley A. Fuller 890 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 Ben B. and Norma J. Jepson 2078 Lasher Court Meridian, ID 83642 Coe J. Parker 2930 W. Pine Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 Ler and Fae M. Stucker Trust L. R. and F. M. Stucker, Trustees 2695 W. Cherry Lane Meridian, ID 83642 James W. and Lois J. Fuller 1635 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 Alford E. and Maurren Massengale 1115 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 Gary W. and Cheryl L. Lamunyon 1025 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 Betty J. Mosher 895 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 /rpt. V A Dig oil e rrt i 1r !rte b 9036033 10/0/;L 7/ 5 � FOR VALUE RECEIVED ELMER L. MERLE and MARGARET P. MERLE, ELMER_4�r_'RERLL C •/ < <"""'•"'. husband and wife the Gr.ntoq do bacby F- % buphi. sa sod aoo.cy imto DeWAYNE SAILEY and MILLIt -�'--. BAILEY, husband and wife e.. the Gu:tees, vbne sddrm is 1180 NORTH Tilt 14If ROAD ,MERIDIAN, ID 83642 my of is, ma, boor en a - the foUow�inl doatbed pcmise� �o-�'@: ' , SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HE:RiTO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BY �, REFERENCE: MARGARET F. IE;4F, known or IduriM.d to an to be Ow TO HAVE AND TO HOLD We saki p bm viA dcb Wpuneuaru mm 6e G�atey Well kin aoG Hyla - y2`- fae.a. And tk aid Guam do k-lby mv,"... m .ed -id de aid C --l-& 6d dey re IM o.vcrt le fee -Pk p—l— Ww aid pt=.b. arc frcc hvm Z rsrxp f. 1m 4 tact ad tsr� fQ tk ycr 1990--d person(s) who(so) namo(s) talars subsCibod t0 fM fYIWn wbgr* y—k c- -a, m iWcd, resmmom ad taxse u of w A; : - _d 6t 6ey .0 raaaa aad dcfod 6e sur Loa ac I-dul dal— tA.. m z t- DATED: June 28, 1990 axem"d ttta SmAL - $ FG ELMER_4�r_'RERLL C •/ < <"""'•"'. STATE OF WAStVNGTON:,q� ,. ` my of is, ma, boor en a ' notary pubUc, personalty appsarod ElAER L IMEFLE A» MARGARET F. IE;4F, known or IduriM.d to an to be Ow _ person(s) who(so) namo(s) talars subsCibod t0 fM fYIWn _ - - Instrument and scknowisdped to ms Nst ha4haVWy tnv9 '•;; axem"d ttta SmAL - -�- - ry.Pu01M ddirnp r,Ci�++u-. r'ashlnpton _ - My oonvnlealon Wj*.c PIONEER TTTLE COhTPANY OF CANYON COUNTY ` SOUTH AIBAILy: • "`~ _ i7I10 fOTH AVE SOUTH 4. IDAHO SWI 4b Abs cz04. �+ sti CA1DW714 ID t36m Jsz June 1, 1993 Mr. Wayne Forrey City Clerk City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, ID 83642 RE: Welker Annexation Request Dear Mr. Forrey: I hereby give my permission to Vicki Welker to submit a requ e annexation of my property, located on the east side of Ten Mile Road and described in the attached legal description into the Corporate Limits of the City of Meridian. , /". )a&Ltg -Iola-J�' DeWayne Baiwy Acknowledgement State of Idaho ) ss County of Ada ) Millie Bailey s On this , day of J i k-ae- 1993 personally appeared �P �p u �2jc�► pec t and CY1 �, le - known or identified to me to be t e person w-tYbse name is subscribed to he within instrument and who acknowledged to me that he executed the same. iry Publ+b for Idaho ding in Boise, Idaho. JCM/bh/224.ltr e' 04I G # r J*V '•.• .>PiA TB Of June 1, 1993 ANNEXATION TEN MILE ROAD A tract of land in the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 11, T.3N., RAW., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the section corner common to Sections 2, 3, 10 and 11, T.3N., RAW., B.M., thence South along the section line common to Sections 10 and 11, 1328.37 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 89020' East along the North boundary of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 11, 332.03 feet to a point on the approximate centerline of a certain canal; thence South 40004'40" East along said centerline, 716.11 feet to a point; thence South 58045'30" East along said centerline, 67.90 feet to a point; thence South 80°14'50" West, 348.42 feet to a steel pin; thence North 88000' West on a line between two certain ditches, 508.04 feet to a point on the section line common to said Sections 10 and 11; thence North along said section line, 628.32 feet to the Real Point of Beginning. 557.des i-. NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 P. M. , on October- IL, 1993, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of Vicki Welker, for annexation and zoning of approximately 6.77 acres of land located in the Northwest 1f49 Section 11, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise -Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and which property is genet -ally located on Ten Mile Road North of Pine Road. That the application requests annexation with zoning of R-4. Further Applicant requests Preliminary Plat approval of the parcel of land above described for- 16 single family dwelling lots for- Valeri Heights Subdivision. A more particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for- inspection during regular - business hours. A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. S� Dated this 2l day of _ �Z�eH-- ti 1993. WILL BERG, CIT` CLERK. plQp ill ARM � o c '! 0 , E � 0 op a �4 ti as U c k m v c .o E eo �A •,-I E c v —4 (o RC °_' o ' �' E E'- U .c. �8E4 0-j _ woEQ E �o jw Dm ti- c A m o 09 :n .y G .eco E'�y LL aK N E N s c 8v c 0 ao o aC m c aa � c t6 xp S C� ai0 � � ice E R . CCO, 8 b�BE�,O V1 t�tl_ Ig 7 p O w E. E O N C> C.OF U O W G O O� Off+ m r-+ oaa= Cgs.=ol oo N 9a. ID �3 3 =r bw$ �� UOU4❑❑ =U •5 poE�cn u ID N .T F�.� a°EIDo � a�o •o _ Mb " d Exw�w � o❑ ❑❑ N N Nn. d N m � �Q Q0 M to M 11 lc ) co co M p Q O a C,O H H H Z r w � UJ p 'ri � O 'ri LL r � LU O r� V W H i.. g cQc >1 I r7 r —4-I ��I �4 (L) N U wo N tea° E Pa WERE Oo z O •� •�Azs n >1z E z> aOH O iY �p n r �y.�+� F-� W H O r •�4 � �9r �(-�M-:Y-� ; E a` z 7 T O a cJ ..! -0 N c y z� z Q C .a M � V') l p .w H � G view elge;un000br ao.1 z W a H z 0 CL J Q m 0 Y z m W H W IL } H } m 0 W H W 2 A�� Cm J c P2)C OSR9_ , 1 5 • x (e .'77 1- `RCUS 6 • 7 7 = �1 0 1 _. 5 101 • 55 + 1 2 • 9 0 + F-QJ� 4 0 0. 00 + 003 i AY1,wt id4al 5 1 4. 4 5 I.O�S 21 x -�� OA 2 1 0. 00 210•0o + 11 3 0 0. 0 0 + �l` 12.90 + 003 ( Pjtjt^ ko4a1 5 2 2 • 0 522.90 514.45 + 002 2664 5050/01350 1 HIS SLIP FOR REFERENCE �" NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., on February 15, 1994, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of Vicki Welker, for annexation and zoning of approximately 6.77 acres of land located in the Northwest 1/4, Section 11, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise -Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is generally located on Ten Mile Road North of Pine Road. That the Application requests annexation with zoning of R-4. Further Applicant requests Preliminary Plat approval of the parcel of land above described for 16 single family dwelling lots for Vareri Heights Subdivision. A more particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Dated this 25th day of January 1994. WILLIAM G. BERG, A.,'CITY CLERK 4 SUBDIVISION EVALUATION St1EET Proposed Development Name formerly VALERI HEIGHTS SUB Date Reviewed 03/03/94 Preliminary Stage City MER1E144 4 1 Final XXXXX'AR 3 1 �'1 Engineer/Developer Hubble Engr. / Vicki Welker an CT The following SUBDIVISION NAME is approved by the Ada County Engineer or his designee per the requirements of the IDAHO STATE CODE. Date The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Boise City Street Name Ordinance. The following existing street names shall appear on the plat as: "WEST CHERRY LANE" "NORTH TEN MILE ROAD" "NORTH HARDING WAY" The following proposed street name is over ten letters in length and cannot be approved unless Ada Countv Highway District will verify that the street name will fit on a sign in writing: "WEST VALERI HEIGHT COURT" The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE, NC REP NTATIVES OR DESIGNEES Ada County Engineer John Priester Date C� Ada Planning Assoc. Terri Raynor Date 3 Meridian FirBDistrict Representative Date NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed !!!! Sub Index Street Index NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS depends on phase 1 MSUMBOISE.FRM i co (n 7 t Z ' l N I I ILI, w 0 334-. IES JW Jt"tll s �- •+ 1 -i�-�,'�� •✓,/ • /�••?�_ '-_� it • co (n 7 t Z ' l N I I ILI, w 0 334-. IES s �- 1 y =j June 1, 1993 ANNEXATION TEN MILE ROAD A tract of land in the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 11, T.3N., R.1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the section corner common to Sections 2, 3, 10 and 11, T.3N., R.1 W., B.M., thence South along the section line common to Sections 10 and 11, 1328.37 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 89020' East along the North boundary of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 11, 332.03 feet to a point on the approximate centerline of a certain canal; thence South 40004'40" East along said centerline, 716.11 feet to a point; thence South 58045'30" East along said centerline, 67.90 feet to a point; thence South 80°14'50" West, 348.42 feet to a steel pin; thence North 88000' West on a line between two certain ditches, 508.04 feet to a point on the section line common to said Sections 10 and 11; thence North along said section line, 628.32 feet to the Real Point of Beginning. 557.des i F r LU --- ` .. �• . •� . iii ,.p`'J. 1•�=9 For Accountable Mail U m o � A w N O � oo v' N O Z Na3 CD N T O mm Q— �C 3a CN y - y W 00 `3 cn S D G m �R (� �y \ mo O_ LD. (' CDz \� m c a3 °. 6- 0 0 ° o° o wCD 0 o m CD N w Z 0 D pRc "20 r r �rnc��-on Z R. Orgy»c'o WEB (SD Mp O E9vc.° 8 W 'R E3 �mB°ya p' w f0 [fi R C y in W C S C0. w 9 B -. ; s m =-a 0 o`�,0 o °'�003 w m 7 w a. UQ i$ w�fDO �9 w E C6 7 vOoy� 8 C: U') HGF ,awC� (D > Nn W O D O fD 0 > r" ct (D w N - rr K h, �j K (D C O K rr in Sv rC �Ij U) Sv O �3- 3 N O N K �D, sv C ID rf- Fn 'D n L O K O H `.j (D a C7 O (D �D_ , O K U m Sv K K in (1 N 11 C m Co O ND (D D 'TJ O D G (D D W �5 " m (p t� F K SZ CD ti FJ (D K (D N (D D K Ul Fl- o '•O 'TJ (p F� • a y N0 o K O (D 1. U� N `Q K D Sv K ❑❑❑❑5 v (D O C) � Ct_ a CD c:D ) O ❑❑ ❑° =H 145 X -0n CD y O G w' CDD v T a CD ab cD i CD <D n d ❑ CC ? �p n 1v � E {® �D n p 'S h w o $. b D p w o U5) Z n HUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. 9550 Bethel Court • Boise, Idaho 83709 208/322-8992 ■ Fax 208/378-0329 July 29, 1993 Mr. Wayne Forrey City Clerk City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Street Meridian, ID 83642 RE: Valeri Heights Preliminary/Final Plat Dear Mr. Forrey: On behalf of Vicki Welker, we hereby request that the annexation, preliminary plat, and final plat be processed simultaneously through Planning & Zoning and City Council. This project is on the east side of Tenmile Road, south of Cherry Lane. The annexation application is for 8.57 acres and is contiguous to the City of Meridian on the north boundary. The preliminary and final plat is for 6.77 acres, including 16 buildable lots. The requested zone for the annexation is R-4, however, lots will exceed the minimum requirements of the R-4 zone. The subdivision will contain a private park amenity, maintained and owned by the homeowner's association, and restrictive covenants will be prepared to address landscaping and standards for builders. Also, we hereby request that the findings of facts and conclusions of law be prepared prior to the first Planning and Zoning meeting so they can be acted upon at the first hearing. This project has been designed to meet your goals of the existing comprehensive plan and we will work with you to meet the goals of the new comprehensive plan. This upper -end subdivision will be a great addition to the City of Meridian and we look forward to working with you on the processing of the application. Sincerely, G - James C. Merkle, P.E. JCM/bh/363.ltr cc: Vicki Welker > AUG -11-1992 15:3' FPOrl CIT) OF MERILDIAH TO 3780329 P.02 APPLIATION FOR ANNEXATION APPROVAL & ZONING OR REZONE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION I. GENERAL INFORMATION VA-LE21 lie l G (PROPOSED NAME OF FILING INFORMATION TS Sv3pIV1S1ow SUBDIVISION NW ')Li 5EL_l I.. i-• 3r-4 (z W (GENERAL LOCATION) 5vr-- A -T A c -q E�O L'c- L' (LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ATTACH IF LENGTHY) DEyvA`1Ni A MIL -ULE "3,h-tc._C- % 888 z93U (OWNER(S) OF RECORD) (NAME) (TELEPHONE NO.) ) 1 �3 o t4, (ADDRESS) V I G tz- W G L -V -C (Z 8 8 8 5 6 0 0 (APPLICANT) (NAME) (TELEPHONE NO.) ►Fo 5ox ADDRESS) 83680 H L413 a L're L. r4 61 N t L-�J2 I H G 3 Z_Z- b 9 9 -2- (ENGINEER, SURVEYOR OR PLANNER) (NAME) (TELEPHONE NO.) g55y C T _T 015E).D 83709 (ADDRESS) Gl T \y of ME:21I �)I'AN (JURISDICTION(S) REQUIRING APPROVAL) (A !_ (TYPE OF SUBDIVISION - RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL) +50 &- 5 ACRES OF LAND IN CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP. (ACCEPTED BY:) (FEE) June 1, 1993 ANNEXATION TEN MILE ROAD A tract of land in the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 11, T.3N., RAW., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the section corner common to Sections 2, 3, 10 and 11, T.3N., RAW., B.M., thence South along the section line common to Sections 10 and 11, 1328.37 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 89'20' East along the North boundary of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 11, 332.03 feet to a point on the approximate centerline of a certain canal; thence South 40'04'40" East along said centerline, 716.11 feet to a point; thence South 58045'30" East along said centerline, 67.90 feet to a point; thence South 8014'50" West, 348.42 feet to a steel pin; thence North 88000' West on a line between two certain ditches, 508.04 feet to a point on the section line common to said Sections 10 and 11; thence North along said section line, 628.32 feet to the Real Point of Beginning. 557.des ENG�H\ r �y0 SURVF-'�o .-1 1 HUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. 9550 Bethel Court ■ Boise, Idaho 83709 208/322-8992 • Fax 208/378-0329 Project No. 93-073 July 22, 1993 VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION A parcel of land located in the SW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 11, T.3N., R.1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the corner common to Sections 2, 3, 10, and 11, T.3N., R.1W., B.M.; thence South 00000'05" West, 1328.42 feet to the North 1/16 corner; thence South 00000'04" East, 190.00 feet to a point; thence South 89020'17" East, 45.00 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING (INITIAL POINT). Thence continuing South 89020'17" East, 446.10 feet to a point in the center of Eightmile Lateral; thence along the centerline of Eightmile Lateral South 39034'48" East, 408.84 feet to a point; thence 114.49 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 21052'00", and a long chord bearing South 50030'48" East, 113.80 feet to a point; thence South 6102654" East, 9.02 feet to a point; thence departing said centerline South 80°16'00" West, 344.57 feet to a point; thence North 88001'37" West, 507.99 feet to a point on the section line common to said Sections 10 and 11; thence North 00000'04" West, 438.22 feet to a point; thence South 89020'17" East, 45.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 6.73 acres. Prepared By: HUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. RF_ DTP/bh/606.des D. Terry Peugh, L.S. PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300' OF VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION Stonehouse Evangelical Corporation 1450 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642-5404 Rex L. and Elma Narrison 1300 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 David S. and Shirley A. Fuller 890 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 Ben B. and Norma J. Jepson 2078 Lasher Court Meridian, ID 83642 Coe J. Parker 2930 W. Pine Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 Ler and Fae M. Stucker Trust L. R. and F. M. Stucker, Trustees 2695 W. Cherry Lane Meridian, ID 83642 James W. and Lois J. Fuller 1635 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 Alford E. and Maurren Massengale 1115 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 Gary W. and Cheryl L. Lamunyon 1025 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 Betty J. Mosher 895 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, ID 83642 /rpt. CITY CLERK FILE CHECKLIST Project Name: Valeri Heights File No. AZ 00-006 Date Received from Planning and Zoning Department: Planning and Zoning Level: 0 Transmittals to agencies and others: X❑ Notice to newspaper with publish dates: X❑ Certifieds to property owners: February 23, 2000 Q Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation:XO Approve ❑ Deny Unknown Hearing Date: March 14, 2000 February 15, 2000 02/25/00 and 03/10/00 Notes: Property was not published, re -schedule PH for 4/11 /00 - Noticed 3/24 and 4/7/00 - certs went out March 21, 2000. City Council Level: Transmittals to agencies and others: X❑ Notice to newspaper with publish dates: 0 Certifieds to property owners: ❑ City Council Action: Hearing Date: May 16, 2000 N/A 04/28/00 and 05/12/00 Vvt) ❑ Approve El/' Deny ❑ Findings / Conclusions / Order received from attorney on: Findings / Conclusions / Order: ❑ Approved by Council: ❑ Copies Disbursed: ❑ Findings Recorded Development Agreement: ❑ Sent for signatures: ❑ Signed by all parties: ❑ Approved by Council: ❑ Recorded: ❑ Copies Disbursed: Ordinance No. Resolution No. ❑ Approved by Council: ❑ Recorded: Deadline: 10 days ❑ Published in newspaper: ❑ Copies Disbursed: Notes: Resolutions: Original Res / Copy Cert: Minutebook Copy Res / Copy Cert: City Clerk City Engineer City Planner City Attorney Sterling codifiers Project File Copy Res / Ongmal Cert: Ada County (CPAs) Applicant (non -CPAs) Recorded Ordinances: Original: Minutebook Copies to: City Clerk State Tax Comm. Sterling Codifiers City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Project file Applicant (if appl.) Findings ! Orders: Original: Minutebook Copies to: Applicant Project file City Engineer City Planner City Attorney Record Vacation Findings' Recorded Development Agreements: Original: Fireproof File Copies to:Applicant Project file City Engineer City Planner City Attorney I Ilia IuGii IV Statesman-, Ci -LY Of leridian P.O. Box 40, Boise, Idaho 83707-0040`4 ' LEGAL ADVERTISING PROOF OF PI IRI ivy dept, Account # DTI# Identification Amount: 064514 218754 PUBLIC HEARING - WELKER $56.28 Ordered by: P.O. # Rate Run Dates SHELBY INT MAR. 24, APR. 7, 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN Number of Lines 33 EAST IDAHO STREET 37 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Affidavit Legal # 1 6718 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of hearing at the Me idian Citill y Halla3Public Ea t Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho at the hour Of 7:00 p.m. on April 11, 2000 for the Pur- pose of reviewing and considering the application of Vicki Welker for annexation and zoning of 12.73 acres for proposed Valeri Heights Subdivision from RT to LO and R-15 generally located on the north- east corner of Pine Street and Ten Mile Road. Furthermore, the application requests a conditional use permit and preliminary Plat for proposed multi family, townhouse, and office application. A more particular description -of the above Property is on file in the City -Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection dur- ing regular business hours. A copy of the application Is available upon request. Any and all interested per- sons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 15th day of March, 2000 WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CITY CLERK Pub. Mar..24, Apr. 7, 2000 6718 JANICE HILDRETH, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That she is the Principal Clerk of The Idaho Statesman, a daily newspaper printed and published at Boise, Ada County, State of Idaho, and having a general circulation therein, and which said newspaper has been continuously and uninterruptedly published in said County during a period of twelve consecutive months prior to the first publication of the notice, a copy of which is attached hereto: that said notice was published in The Idaho Statesman, in conformity with Section 60-108, Idaho Code, as amended for: TWO consecutive weekly =single =consecutive daily =odd skip insertion(s) beginning with the issue of: MARCH 24, 2000 and ending with the issue of: APRIL 7 , 2000 STATE OF IDAHO ) )ss COUNTY OF ADA On this 7 day of APRIL in the year of 2000 before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared before me Janice Hildreth known or identified to me to be the person whose name subscribed to the within instrument, and being by me first duly sworn, declared that the state- ments therein are true, and acknowledged to me that she executed the same. Notary Public for Idaho .ani••,,,,,. Residing at: Boise, Idaho °,°�' ; LIS M Commission expires: I NR J U P U B�1 ;'•` •. Q- J a ° CL (D N E T E Z .0 N U r Q �ED L � m a� �LL 0 0,o a w o p LL U N 0-7 = Leo cL ° LL a� EwB UW ��LLX N ° c> °LLNLLNNO== lk 40.). m a ° CL (D V E T M C C Z .0 N U r LL a �ED ° c> lk m 41 0 > r a°i o U �z Ca � o s z- a d a c 3W a O LL 'a D Ecc U =U Q - c p cC ULU Q ❑❑ ED] ❑ (A W Z cC a LL C uj 1.4 cA Q W o, O U) u m O O E N W G Z dW ON � a H en g Nwcc5 G W a❑❑❑❑ mv W N V W O J W 0 a W m O Z F- f Wa m Z O M a Z N N Y W a th o *'� W ce W G Z M � '� W ce 3 C F o co {iJ rl V Z CO W CO Z C V M Z W r Q Z J n a V4 d ce W N L g O O a N `� G cd Q ui LL LU z 0 N W W Z UJ O N O v O O ao p V O N O W 5� O E to . a Z T4 N M Ln In wl 10f1 W N M Ln Ln N C yN R L1 C T N Ch 1;T m D N c r N In CO co Oi OT r r r Z J a�Ndmc i O L V C Q - - 2��m_� E m N o y y N ate Ey Tc, m - � X�.. 0 m c w E > L5oLpo z W408a daci�f0mm v E E E C- o�cwmv o E m �g E iL E N x O V A �nEooao a O N U N— N - E V CLC,, E N V O Y O N 0-0 m C C nE� - 'D 0o�mo �9o2rid a�i$oErnm ` � fn L,C:f o O O'er X O V m EC, a o c E L c m c° m~ c o o. m ° � o o � . m my S -E- aci mcg Z3_'m d U O N , Y ad �cmiw o� C N Cy m N .O w m m c d L aUi co, m 0 I I� U N CL (D V E T M C C Z .0 N U r LL a �ED E 7 a cC o. Y 0 w E0 roocnLL ' U d Z — N L O a C li E U IT r co �LL N N 9 x U 6-0 U� Q a3 O ci cc Q a LL � O C) .� U aw � ccc ❑❑ �— N! 3 co U N W �. U C Q 0 a cc Z E m - C CC p U O E ccU a (LU ❑❑❑❑ L E a) , ,D CL d 0 a d a o UWU CL � 1�N -�O a z in N 0 � t0 �0dc d r E Q w c r N C7 Lo (O I� �r r Z O v N m N a) ro C mo'�ul�m j W p a a C: not U ,- uil 0 m� =6d��m a v t7 O C Oj O 9 , CLui Emm0a0)A XFac'm0 m C W o E a CL V' >Q H m 0 O L 00 W W W ro C T to EUSC' CD v ` d m Z NEEI.D=� N U a O p O a p O C'm E'mm W ie�E>L N W d I— a c a E o Zn Z m U' W C cyo- m @ E U E 1-4 J H O C j a O O E U l9 — N -OO.NE ca o o .°o a� c - Z a 3 V Z Ui ^q rn E J � EAEO 0 Z M O O.6 X 'o. W �"' mw�E¢o`� Lo CL > O'E a)- 2 O O H C O d 10 ~ 3 ch Z Z 00 N M N Z -UO`�a Y C_ M d' V -4Z O N ^ O Z 00 N 74 O tV O OD Im c tN0 d N 0 N C a v) r01 H L Z � N W E Z O E Cie � C � CO � z m ai IL _ = Q Z W O Z O a T w a) �1 W a0 oo a_ Q Q Q �. m Q n (9 W a � U a) 1=1. m rn O 4) co r) >> E z'o o LL r r r r F J d O OWD r E W LA po m -�O a z in N 0 � t0 �0dc d r E Q w c r N C7 Lo (O I� �r r Z O N m N a) ro C mo'�ul�m m02 C: not U ,- =6d��m CEAE yEm E. C a V C Oj O 9 Emm0a0)A XFac'm0 m C W o E T a)'5 O L 00 ro C T to EUSC' CD v ` d m NEEI.D=� N U a O p O a p O C'm E'mm ie�E>L 10 O D TU a c a E o Zn vW a)q C(n L N C cyo- m @ E U E CD C a m E y ' C O C j a O O E U l9 — N -OO.NE ca o o .°o a� c - a E o - m owccaao cc9cT ^q rn E � EAEO 0 O O.6 X 'o. mw�E¢o`� > O'E a)- 2 O O H C O d 10 O U O 6 ^ O m C MCi---LoEA'� E m (L U O N -UO`�a Y C_ v C m m 10 10 S E O 4 m m O Y c d N \V\J C a o a H O o E � V � � z m IL Z E a T w a) �1 W a0 oo a_ _S E =� a) za U � � U a) m rn 4) co r) >> E z'o o LL r r r r F J d NOTICE OF HEARING IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian NOTICEPlanning and Zoning Commission of the e Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Pla it Hall 33 East Idaho Street, and th at the Meridian City City of Meridian will hold a public hearing Meridian, Idaho at the hour of 7:00 p.m. on April 11, 2000 for the purpose of reviewing Vicki Welker for annexation and zoning of 12.73 and considering the application of Vi ei hts Subdivision from RT to LO and R-15 generally acres for proposed Valeri H g located on the northeast corner of Pine Street and Ten Mile Road. Furthermore, the application requests a conditional use permit and preliminary plat for proposed multi family, townhouse and office application. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 15th day of March, 2000. 0, 1111 11E1MrtFrlr�� OF �- :WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. CIT CLERK SEAL -7k BUST 155 O PUBLISH March 24 & Aj�Q,7 NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho at the hour of 7:00 p.m. on March 14, 2000 for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of Vicki Welker for annexation and zoning of 12.73 acres for proposed Valeri Heights Subdivision from RT to LO and R-15 generally located on the northeast corner of Pine Street and Ten Mile Road. Furthermore, the application requests a conditional use permit and preliminary plat for proposed multi family, townhouse and office application. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 16th day of February, 2000. PUBLISH February 25 & March 10, 2000 IL4��M�G„ERG, JR.MTkY CLERK ORA ALL - Cou /��r''P9Pfi 41�t11t111\ HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 - Fax 288-2501 Robert D. Corrie CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS BUILDING DEPARTMENT Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO (208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297 Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 - Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Tamm deWeerd Tammy City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT Cherie McCandless (208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: February 29, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 15, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 14, 2000 FILE NUMBER: AZ -00-006 REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONING FOR 12.73 ACRES FOR PROPOSED VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, MULTI FAMILY, TOWNHOUSE, OFFICE-- FROM RT TO R-15 AND LO BY: VICKI WELKER LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: NE CORNER OF PINE AND TEN MILE SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C _TAMMY de WEERD, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE _BUILDING DEPARTMENT _FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM & FINAL) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: j CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: (208) 888-4433 Fax: (208) 887-4813 APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OR REZONE El I: oo - oo6 PROPOSED NAME OF SUBDIVISION: V ALE:Q) 14 E 16. 1+ Ts.50.6 D I V l S) OA ,jr- cciLKFa piNE 57- ,u(16g TEr1MjLF_ GENERAL LOCATION: `65 O N i G J M i 1.lr,--- ROAD TYPE (RESIDENTIAL, INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL): R Lc5 o E:9i i A L A WD OFF) CE ACRES OF LAND IN PROPOSED ANNEXATION: $ J z --73 PRESENT LAND USE: h6 K I GJ c -1&) Kil, L PROPOSED LAND USE: MU LT i F -A r^)1 -Y , ToyJ nl N oJ.SC , O F'i-t G E PRESENT ZONING DISTRICT: (L i PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT: LO , _ 1 5- IC. APPLICANT: C� a L -D Qi v r- JZ COMP -AN) i nlG PHONE: $9 of SOC) ADDRESS: 13 1 j F-F'9AP4 Ku A A0 S 1 9 t oZ ME --9 1 P) A0 S34 Ll Z ENGINEER, SURVEYOR, OR PLANNER: JD A V � J �' AJ L -Q P. �. PHONE:'d-70-)013 ADDRESS: G't 1 `7 SA rr-j-,A C." F. Pk 601.5 SS -7001 OWNER(S) OF RECORD: DAY) Q ar"D rte- }}► P1.�y FUGLE2 PHONE: �iJ5�5 - 3 Z1$ ADDRESS: Signature of Applicant Q 20*3SUd VVLOV8880E SZ:9T 00, EE E8d MAYOR Robert D. Conic CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tammy devkeerd Cherie McCandless HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 - Fax (203) 887-4313 City Clark Office Fax (208) 838-4213 LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208)887-2211- Fax 8$7.129? PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 854-5533 - Fac 838.6854 TRANSMITTAL, TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: February 29, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 15 2000 HEARING DATE: March 14, 2000 FILE NUMBER: AZ -00-006 REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONING FOR 12.73 ACRES FOR PROPOSED VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION MULTI FAMILY TOWNHOUSE OFFICE-- FROM RT TO R-15 AND LO BY: VICKI WELKER LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: NE CORNER OF PINE AND TEN MILE SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR ____RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE MCCANDLESS, CIC _KEITH BIRD, C/C TAMMY de WEERD, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT XC SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE _BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER _CITY PLANNER RFcEr\7ED FEB 2 3 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: CCENTRAL DISTRICT 'HEALTH DEPARTMENT ne CEN I"RAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPART MENT Environmental Health Division 00 _00 ltb - FE B 2 3 2000 Conditional Use # CTTY OF I Vi Preliminary / Final / Short Plat Return to: ❑ Boise ❑ Eagle ❑ Garden City Meridian ❑ Kuna ❑ ACz I. We have No Objections to this Proposal. ❑ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ❑ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ❑ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ❑ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ❑ high seasonal ground water ❑ waste flow characteristics ❑ or bedrock from original grade ❑ other ❑ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. ❑ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. ❑ 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ❑ central sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water well ❑ interim sewage ❑ central water ❑ individual sewage ❑ individual water ❑ 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: ❑ central sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water ❑ sewage dry lines ❑ central water ❑ 10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ❑ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ❑ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ❑ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ❑ food establishment ❑ swimming pools or spas ❑ child care center ❑ beverage establishment ❑ grocery store 14. /y0 o aTE' rlows T0 Date: 2— Reviewed Reviewed By: d ar 4i4.�L>10il CDHD 10/91 rd, rev. 1/91 Review Sheet HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR A Good Place [o Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT Robert D. Corrie THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z (208) 1-88-2499 - Fax 288-2501 _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z CITY OF MERIDIAN _KEITH BORUP, P/Z CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR PUBLIC WORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4.433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE (208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: February 29, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 15, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 14, 2000 FILE NUMBER: AZ -00-006 REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONING FOR 12.73 ACRES FOR PROPOSED VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, MULTI FAMILY, TOWNHOUSE, OFFICE-- FROM RT TO R-15 AND LO BY: VICKI WELKER LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: NE CORNER OF PINE AND TEN MILE SALLY NORTON, P/Z MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT KENT BROWN, P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION _KEITH BORUP, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT _RON ANDERSON, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) _KEITH BIRD, C/C U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) _TAMMY de WEERD, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) _WATER DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM & FINAL) _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE _BUILDING DEPARTMENT _FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARK :' POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 Robert D. Corrie CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS BUILDING DEPARTMENT Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 jl MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642PLANNING Keith Bird YG (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-48 1 AND ZONING Tammy deWeerd Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 .,_ q rtrt 2 8 L00U DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 •Fax 888-6854 City of Meridian City rk TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: February 29, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 15, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 14, 2000 FILE NUMBER: AZ -00-006 REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONING FOR 12.73 ACRES FOR PROPOSED VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, MULTI FAMILY, TOWNHOUSE, OFFICE-- FROM RT TO R-15 AND LO BY: VICKI WELKER LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: NE CORNER OF PINE AND TEN MILE SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C _TAMMY de WEERD, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE _BUILDING DEPARTMENT _FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM & FINAL) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: 2 2 -o 0 ( /1-1C,, I /t C✓ i-0 r t.v iS '� F! . 4�,�; XHUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT Robert D. Come (208) 238-2499 - Fax 288-2501 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PUBLIC WORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 - Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: February 29, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 15, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 14, 2000 FILE NUMBER: AZ -00-006 REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONING FOR 12.73 ACRES FOR PROPOSED VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, MULTI FAMILY, TOWNHOUSE, OFFICE-- FROM RT TO R-15 AND LO BY: VICKI WELKER LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: NE CORNER OF PINE AND TEN MILE SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C TAMMY de WEERD, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE _BUILDING DEPARTMENT _FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER RFcFlv-PD FEB 2 9 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM & FINAL) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS �'LIMIM REC51VED �E8IS100 Meridiatt . t�6't Water Sum 12 ** TX CONFIRV#'NON REPORT ** DATE TIME TO/FROM 05/16 13:36 2083362537 Meridian City Council 33 East Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 AS OF MAY 16,E 13:38 PAGE.01 CITY OF MERIDIAN MODE MIN/SEC PGS EC --S 01'39" 004 May 14, 2000 2509 West Wave Court Meridian, ID 83642 RE: proposed Valeri Heights Apartments Dear City Council: CMD#S STATUS 109 OK -------------------------- fREcEIVE .D MAY 16 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE C VV�17J o0 li s-1$ 9 I I am writing in regard to the proposed apartment complex, Valeri Heights, on the Proposed site on Ten Mile Road and Pine Street in Meridian. As a resident of the nearby Haven Cove subdivision, t am onnosed to such a development for the following reasons: 1. Ada County Highway District Commissioners in March 2000 were not given their own traffic count done on 11/23/99 which indicates traffic on Ten Mile Road is NOW at a level they predicted it would reach in the year 2005. A traffic count done in April 2000 has not been used for the decision making by ACH:D. 2. The current City Comprehensive Plan prefers high density housing close to shopping, schools, and employment. However, there are no employers close by, and pedestrians would have to walk without sidewalks on Ten Mile and Pine to get to shopping and schools. An incredible safety hazard. 3. The developer compares Valeri Heights to Aspen Hills on Meridian Road. The difference is that Aspen Hills was not inflicted on an existing neighborhood; 'it is surrounded on two sides by fields, on one side by commercial, and on one side by an existing apartment complex. Aspen Hills is also connected by sidewalks to a shopping area. Valeri Heights will be an island with sidewalks, which connect to nowhere. Please put a stop to this irresponsible patchwork development which is destroying the quality of life in our town. Approve future development that makes sense, not cents. Sincerely yours, Alan Norris NO a1n `L I s WARRANTY DEED For Value Received r Thomas R. Walker and Lillian I. Walker, husband and wife, hereinafter aft2Z referred to as Grantor, does hereby grant, bargain, sell, and ca1ey unto ti • David S. Fuller arra Shirley A. Fuller, urban, arra wife, hereinafter referred to as. Grantee, whGse current address is 890 N. Ten Mile Rd., Meridian, ID, 83642 z the following described premises, to -wit: That certain real property .more particularly described upon "Exhibit A" attached hereto, which said "Exhibit A" is by this reference inxxrporated herein and made a part hereof. 9150707 FiR;,T AMERICAN TITLE Co.. ADS ^ .:.TY,ID.FOR J. D4Vi, U'7ARR0 RECORDER B '91 SEP 11 PM 3 59 TO HAVE AND TO FOLD the said premises, with their ap�rs unto the said Grantee, his heirs and assigns forever. And the said Grantor does hereby amwent to and with the said Grantee, that Grantor is the owner in fee simple of said premises; that said premises are free from all ercuTbrarces except current years taxes, levies, and assessments, and except U. S. Patent reservations, restrictions, easements of mord, and easements visible upon the premi`nes, . and that Grantor will warrant and defend the same from alp claims whatsoever. Dated: September 9th, 1991 Thoffias R. Walker llian I. Walker STATE OF IDAHO ) ss CO= OF Ada ) On This L— �� of September, in the year 1991, before me, r Notary Public in arra for said State, perq!)nal7y appeared Thomas R. Walker and LiL7ian I. Walker, krcwn or identified to me to be trz persons whose names are subscribed to the within Instrument, and ac-1ccwledged to me that they executed the same. Notary PublI6 for Idaho Residing at Boise Idaho ,• Camiissian Expires: 7-25-93 .First AmLeri^an Title Company of Idaho FA -80c01 Your No. kALT(ER/FiJL.LER LEGAL DESGUPTICN A parcel of lard being a portion of the Scutlnest quarter of the h�ztrmnst qhs of Section 11, Tt*vT% hip 3 North Fznge 1 West, Eoise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, r=9 particularly described as. follcrrs: Beginning at a brass cap nriXing the wuthc,est corner of said Scutisst quarter of tln— Ncrti ,-est. quarter of Section 11; thence alorg tM A' -terly boundary of said Southwest quar`zr of the Nortlsrst quarter North.00°25'27" East 699.89 feet to a point; thence leaving said Westerly be u lazy of the Southwest quarter of tri-- Nbrthwpst quarter S.^uth 87°35'23" East 313.33 feet (forinrly North 88°CO' G.T25t) to an irrai pin marking the REAL POINT OF BEGDVE r,% thence continuing South 87°35'23" East 194.61 feet tx) an irm pin; tha ce North 80°40'45" East 344.45 feet (formerly South 80°14'50" Inst 348.42) to a point on the centerline of Eight Mile Lateral % the alcrg said centerline of Eight Mile Lateral 085 South 61°01'27" East 14.33 feet to a point; thence leaving said centerline South 00°49'03" West 739.62 feet to a Faint on the Santrerly bcur3ary of said Southwest quarter of tie Northwest quarter% tFeree along said Southerly boundary of the southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter a;.;. North 89 ° 10' S7" West 541.49 feet to a point, said Point being mouth 89'10'57" r East 313.15 feet fran a brass cap marking the Southc,Rst corner of the said Southiest quarter of the Northwest quarter; there leaving said Scutherly bouxb-ry of the Southwest quarter of thn Northwest quarter North 00°25'27" East 691.18 feet to tib POINT OF BEXIINNINr-. EXCEPT DITCH AND ROAD RSGh OF WAY. ALSO EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN Tr^I MILE Fd?AD. } ALSO EXCEPT ANY FCRTICNS LYING WITHIN THE EMU M2 LATMAL. Page 2 WARRANTYDEED For Value Received. ThaTos.R. Walker and Lillian I. Walker, husband and wife, hereinafter referred to as Grantor, does hmmby grant, bargain, sell, and convey unto David S. Fuller and Shirley A. Fuller, husband and wife, hereinafter referred to as Grantee, whose current address is 890 N. Ten Mile Rd., Nleridian, ID, 83642 the following described premises, to-wit: That certain real property more particularly described upon "Edhibit A" attached hereto, which said "Exhibit A" is by this reference irrmrporated herein and made a part hereof. 91.50705_ FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO. J. FOR RECORDER B�•f//`� _D '91 su 11 PM 3 5 TO HAVE AM TO FOLD the said premises, with their appurtenances un the said. Grantee, his heirs and assigns forever. And the said Grantor does hereby covenant to and with the said Grantee, that Grantor is the owner in fee simple of said premises; that said premises are free from all encumbrances except current years taxes, levies, and asses�rnnts, and except U. S. Patent reservations, restrictions, easements of record, and easements visible upon the premises, and that Grantor will warrant arra defend the same from all claims whatsoever. Dated: September 9th. 1991. / Thomas R. Walker L llian 1. Walker STATE OF IDAHO ) ss Ca NN OF Ada h/ ) On This "day of September, in the year 1991, before me, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Turmas R. Walker and Lillian I. Walker, krcwn or identified to me to be the persons wry names are subsCribed to the within Instrurent, and acic�owledged to me that trey e.-zcuted the same. \\t�ulrnnlo.j . ,� C . „ • -rotary Pubc for Idaho Residing at Boise, Idaho 'p ✓^ Commission Expires: 7-:25-93 First American Title Company of Idaho A. p%3l'�� of 1<�..^— moi .g a portion of t2s? �4:.tf"ro2St quarter of ti`s RQrthRti'St q — r of Sectim 11, Tc-.Tis!^.ip 3 North Range 1 j est, Boise Meridian, A -da County, Idaho, . r�ra.. pxticularly described as follows: E," ginnir- at a brass cap tkZr}tii tl-- $ 3thY32St COrPPS of said: SCUthc%est quarter of the i;ortl-;,�est cr�ar�r of Section 11, also said bras cap h^g the RzAL =I r'T OF E GiNN=,,,; tt� along tin Masterly bcundary of tt- SGut`rra_s` quartet o£ t� North st qua- •s North 00°25127" East 699.89 feet to a point;,thencz .leavirxi said'Westerly br~'—ar of, said Southwest quartet of the Inst quarter. Scuz� 87 °35'23 ". East 313.33 fit (fcrn�rly North 88 ° CO' �4est) to an than pin; there alt a l irb para11e1 with and Easterly of said Westerly h✓tux3asy Of the Southwest. quarter of the ibrtirvest quarter south CO°25127" West 691.18 feet to a point cnti:ee Scuti-arly bound 's of tie Southwest quarter of the. Northwest quarter; thersz along said Scurtl 'iy boundary of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter Meth 89°10'57" Wast 313.15 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.. EXCEPT DITCH AND ROAD. RIGEUS OF WAY. ALSO T,C.EFr tt%Ny Fr�f7PIQN LYIt��i �dITHIN ThiEST PING AIvT7 TIN MILE ROAD. ALSO EXCEPT ANY PORTIMS I= WITHIN THE TEN MILE STUB DRAIN. AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST We. David S. and Shirley A. Fuller, 890 N. Ten Mile Rd., Meridian, Idaho 83642, being first duly sworn upon oath, depose and say: 1. That we are the owners of the property described on the attached, and we grant our permission to Gold River Companies, Inc., 2326 W. Rainwater Ct., Meridian, Idaho 83642 to submit the accompanying applications for Annexation/Zoning, Conditional Use Permit, and a Preliminary Plat pertaining to that property. 2. We agree to indemnify, defend and hold the City of Meridian and it's employees harmless from any claim or liability resulting from any dispute arising about the statements contained herein as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application. Dated this 31" day of January, 2000 c David S. Fuller 1'-� Shirley A. Fuller SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. Notary Pub"r Idaho .•••tiv • 1 000 • Residing at a-�,.c w �� .,.V � i v ��TARp x My Commission Expires p G * S UBO ••,n5% .....• .O••�i� ,-W It Boundary A parcel of land as shown on Record of Survey No. 1951 situated in a portion of the S1/2 of the NW 1 A of Section 11 T.3N., R.1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at a brass cap marking the W 1 /4 corner of said Section, thence along the West line of said NW1/4 N00°25'27"E a distance of 699.89 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar from which a brass cap marking the NW corner of said Section bears N00°25'27"E a distance of 1956.53 feet; Thence leaving said Section line S87°35'23"E a distance of 507.94 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar; Thence N80°40'45"E a distance of 344.45 feet to a point; Thence S61 °01'27"E a distance of 14.33 feet to a point; Thence S00°49'03"W a distance of 739.62 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar; Thence along the South line of said NWl/4 N89'1 0'57"W a distance of 854.64 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 13.83 acres more or less and is subject to all existing easements and rights-of-way of record or implied. / H Rezone L -O A parcel of land situated in a portion of the Sl/2 of the NW1A of Section 11 T.3N., R.1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho and being particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at a brass cap marking the W1/4 corner of said Section, thence along the West line of said NWIA N00°25'27"E a distance of 460.09 feet to a point from which a brass cap marking the NW corner of said Section bears N00°25'27"E a distance of 2196.33 feet; Thence leaving said Section line S89°34'33"E a distance of 200.50 feet to a point; Thence SO°25'27"W a distance of 273.96 feet to a point; Thence S89°10'57"E a distance of 156.38 feet to a point; Thence S67°06'08"E a distance of 43.08 feet to a point; Thence S22°53'52"W a distance of 51.44 feet to a point; Thence along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 100.00 feet, a central angle of 22°04'49", an arc length of 38.54 feet and a long chord of 38.30 feet bearing S 11 °51'28"W to a point; Thence SO°49'03"W a distance of 86.04 feet to a point; Thence along the South line of said NWIA N89110'57"W a distance of 368.85 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 2.87 acres more or less and is subject to all existing easements and rights-of-way of record or implied. Rezone R-15 A parcel of land situated in a portion of the S 1 /2 of the NW 1 /4 of Section 11 T.3N., R.1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho and being particularly described as follows; Commencing at a brass cap marking the W1/4 corner of said Section 11, thence along the West line of said NW1/4 N00°25'27"E a distance of 460.09 feet to a point from which a brass cap marking the NW corner of said Section bears N00°25'27"E a distance of 2196.33 feet said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing along said Section line N00°25'27"E a distance of 239.80 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar; Thence leaving said Section line S87°35'23"E a distance of 507.94 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar; Thence N80°40'45"E a distance of 344.45 feet to a point; Thence S61°01'27"E a distance of 14.33 feet to a point; Thence S00°49'03"W a distance of 739.62 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar; Thence along the South line of said NWl/4 N89°10'57"W a distance of 485.79 feet to a point; Thence leaving said Section line N00°49'03"E a distance of 86.04 feet to a point; Thence along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 100.00 feet, a central angle of 22°04'49", an arc length of 38.54 feet and a long chord of 38.30 feet bearing N11°51'28"E to a point; Thence N22°53'52"E a distance of 51.44 feet to a point; Thence N67°06'08"W a distance of 43.08 feet to a point; Thence N89°10'57"W a distance of 156.38 feet to a point; Thence N00°25'27"E a distance of 273.96 feet to a point; Thence N89°34'33"W a distance of 200.50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 10.96 acres more or less and is subject to all existing easements and rights-of-way of record or implied. 6901 00 fain Dy V1ly vi MCI u1011, GVOOOODUJ' IYICIy-�-> VV G.44( • �� yLv* JYa luau ACS u ount'J444waa ij Judy Peavey -Derr, president 318 East 37th Street Dave 13ivens, Vice President Garden City, Idaho 83714••6409 Mattysa Meyer, Secretary Phone (208) 387-6100 Sherry R. Huber. Commissioner Fax (208) 387-6391 Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner E -mall: taQ�;eB�bclld,ada.Id.Ua May 15, 2000 RECEIVED MAY 2CCC' Meridian City Council CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 E. Idaho Street CITY CLERK OFFICE Meridian, ID 83642 Subject: Traffic Requirements, Valeri Heights, MPP00-0061MAZ00-06611VIC000-014 Honorable Mayor Corey and City Council Members, At the May 10, 2000 Commission Meeting, the Ada County Highway District (ACRD) Commission directed the staff to evaluate the conditions placed on the Valera Heights Subdivision. The Commission wanted to'ensure that the existing roadway and traffic requirements are consistent with tate traffic volumes and traffic safety. Concerns have previously been expressed to the Commission stating that the requirements had been based upon traffic counts, which do not reflect Meridian High School being in session. After reviewing both the ACHD and the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission requirements, I have found them appropriate. Meridian Planning and Zoning added the requirement that the developer construct a traffic signal before occupancy. While ACHD supports the iristabbon of a traffic signal, we want It to be understood that this is a developer exaction and that ACHD does not have a traffic signal in the current budget or in the Five -Year Work Program. Due to this location being the Intersection of two functionally classified streets, the Commission may be willing to provide the signal hardware if the developer pays for the design and construction of the traffic signal. However, if the Commission does not approve ACHD participation, the signal will be entirely the responsibility of the developer. Regardless of funding, an agreement between ACHD and the developer will be necessary to assure the signal is constructed in accordance with standards. Based on our latest traffic counts, the intersection is close to satisfying the requirements for an all way stop warrant. I recommend that the Council also require the placement of an Interim all -way stop to provide additional safety during the construction of the traffic signal and the initial subdivision work. The stop sign installation will require 36" by 36" STOP signs and 36" by 36" STOP AHEAD signs on Ten Mile Road MAY 15 100 14:44 2088886854 PArF-p") Acts - � OOJ/OOJ north and south of Pine Street. The installation will also require 1$" by 6" ALL WAY STOP supplementary plates on the two new STOP signs and the two existing STOP signs. Sincerely, Terry the P.E. Manager, Traffic Services co: ACHD Commissioner J. Schweitzer, Director Larry Sale P&D Supervisor Laura Wilder Iffna Atkinson File: Ten Mile & Pine Eloctmlc F)kL T-fAdMW%pods/Ten 11 W&pj 8Vg4rW 2 MAY 15 '00 14:44 2058856854 PAGE.03 ** TX CONF I RMr---7N REPORT ** AS OF MAY 15 "'16: 16 13 PAGE. 01 CITY OF i,cRIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD# STATUS 25 05/15 16:12 208 323 0128EC--S 00'54" 002 067 OK --------- ------------------------------------------- AC® "l vll� rD— 5- 1-00 Coun 2L- f 4tva ' c� udy Peavey-o.rr, Preaidanl Rave 8"Nens, Vico PMaidsnt 318 East 371h Street Manysa Mayer, Bavalary Garden city, Idaho 8371443499 Sherry R. Hubar. Ca",gloner Ph --a (308) 307-6100 Susan S. Eastlake, Commtsabnar FOX (208) 387.6391 E-malk � May 15, 2000 RECEIVED MAY 15 2000 Meridian City Council CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 Idaho street CITY CLERK OFFICE Meridian, ID 83842 Subject: Traffic Requirements, Valera Heights. MPP00-4Q5/MAZQ"001MCU0"14 Honorable Mayor Corey and City Council Members, At the May 10, 2000 Commission Meeting, the Ada County Highway District (ACHD) Commission directed the staff to evaluate the conditions placed on the Valerl Heights Subdivision. The' Commimsion wanted to ensure that the existing roadway and traffic requirements are consistent with the traMc volumes and traffic safety. Concerns have Previously been expressed to the Commission stating that the requirements had been based upon traffic counts, which do not reflect Meridian High School being In session. After reviewing both the ACHD and the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission requirements, I have found them appropriate. Meridian Planning and Zoning added the requirement that the developer construct a trafRc Signal before occupancy. While ACHD supports the iristatlation of a traffic signal, we want it to be understood that this is a developer exaction and that ACHD does not have a traffic signal In the current budget or In the Five -Year Work Program. Due to this location being the Intersection of two functionally classified streets, the Commission may be willing to provide the signal hardware if the developer pays for the design and construction of the traffic signal. However. if the Commission does not approve ACHD pariicipst::;:Fs, Lie signal wid be entirely the responsibility of the developer. Regardless of funding, an agreement between ACHD and the developer will be necessary to assure the signal Is constructed in accordance with standards, Based on our latest traffic counts, the intersection is close to slt;�fying the rsquirernents for an all way stop warrant I recommend that t,,„uncal also require the placement of an interim all stop to provide additional safety during the construction of the traffic signal and the Initial subdivision work. The stop sign InsteilaWn will require 36” by 36' STOP signs and 36' by 36" STOP AHEAD signs on Ten Mile Road MAY 15 '00 14:44 2088886854 PAGE.02 May 12, 2000 RECEIVED MAY 122000 City of Meridian City Council Members City Clerk Office 33 East Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 Dear Members of Meridian City Council, The purpose of this letter is to share with you serious concerns we have regarding the proposed Valeri Heights Development. These concerns center on traffic/safety and on compatibility with the surrounding area. Regarding traffic and safety issues, we were confused over how Ada County Highway Commission could approve the Valeri Heights proposal and state there is no traffic problem at this intersection of Ten Mile and Pine which is less than a mile away from Meridian High School. As residents of this neighborhood, we see cars drastically exceeding the 35 mph speed limit and we see turning traffic backed up all day. Along with Laura Wilder, I met with 4 staff members at ACHD on 3-29-2000 and explored with them the information used for their decisions. We also met with Commissioner David Bivens and ACHD Supervisors Larry Sell and Joe Rosenlund on 5-9-2000. Here's what we discovered: 1. The traffic study provided by the developer and completed by Patrick Dobie was based on his reported traffic counts done on 8-6-99 when Meridian High School was not in session. (Mr. Dobie now states that he has counted traffic at other times but he has not provided details of the dates and times of such counts.) No wonder the developer's study reports there is minimal traffic at the intersection! This is a problem! 2. The traffic study by ACHD utilized information from ACHD traffic counts done on 8-26-97 and 8-28-97. Not only are these counts of 6,072 (Ten Mile south of Cherry Lane) and 1,838 (Pine east of Ten Mile) extremely outdated, but (again) these traffic counts were done during the summer when Meridian High School was not in session. According to information provided by the Meridian School District Administration Office, the school year in 1997 began after Labor Day on September 2. This is a problem! 3. When ACHD Commissioners reviewed the revised proposal for Valeri Heights on 3-8-2000 they were not provided with their own more current ACHD traffic count of 8,551 for Ten Mile north of Pine done on 11-23-99. This is an alarming increase of traffic on this road which simply was not considered. This is a problem! 4. In the traffic study provided by the developer, Mr. Dobie cites the COMPASS prediction of traffic for this road to reach 8,550 by the year 2005. Clearly, we are exceeding this level NOW. ACHD has not even scheduled professional (planning) services for this intersection until 2005. Improvements to this road will not occur until a few years after 2005 at best. This is a problem! N At our May 9 meeting with Commissioner Bivens and the supervisors, they expressed an interest in studying the Ten Mile and Pine intersection and making more recommendations regarding the Valeri Heights development. It is our understanding they will be sending a letter to Meridian City Council regarding their concerns. We do not believe that approving Valeri Heights at this time (with the addition of 1,320 vehicle trips per day into this extremely inadequate intersection) is responsible city planning. The safety of this intersection which is within a half mile of Chaparral Elementary School, within a mile of Meridian High School, and within a mile and a half of Meridian Middle School must be a priority and changes must be made rior to consideration of high density projects! Even if the developer were required to put in a traffic signal, this would not resolve the safety concerns for the pedestrian traffic Valeri Heights would generate. Valeri Heights will be an island with sidewalks which connect it with nothing. Residents will be forced to walk without sidewalks to stores along Ten Mile Road. Children and teenagers will be walking along Ten Mile and Pine without sidewalks to get to elementary and high school. These are accidents waiting to happen! Regarding compatibility with the existing neighborhood, this development includes three-story apartments. It is surrounded on three sides by Rural Transition land; it borders up against a subdivision of single family homes (the majority of which are one-story). There is no need for three story apartments in this area! This development on this property is not compatible with the current (1993) Comprehensive Plan which mandates: 1. Encourage new development which reinforces the City's present development pattern of higher -density development within the Old Town area and lower -density development in outlying areas (1.4U, page 23). Promote and strengthen residential development in and around the downtown (3.4U, page 72). Land development regulations should be revised to encourage the in -filling of existing vacant parcels within the city limits (1.12, page 68). The development of housing ... close to employment and shopping centers should be encouraged (1.4, page 67). Valeri Heights is in an outlying area. There are no employers close; residents will have to walk on the road without sidewalks to shop. 2. New development should provide for adequate pedestrian and bicycle access for school children within residential neighborhoods to minimize busing (3.5, page 14). Children walking to school from Valeri Heights will be walking on the street. 3. To protect quality of life and encourage affordable housing the City must direct residential growth into desired locations with adequate infrastructure and services sufficient to meet the demand (page 67). Valeri Heights will create traffic and pedestrian problems at this already inadequate intersection. The existing infrastructure and services cannot meet the demand of this high-density project on this site at this time. This will be a burden to our community! 4. New development should enhance rather than detract from the visual quality of its surroundings (5.2U, page 73). Valeri Heights with its 3 -story apartments does not blend in with the rural land that surrounds it nor does it blend with the single family homes in the subdivision on which it borders. We have driven around Aspen Hills Apartments in Meridian. As you know, it is also three stories. The major difference is that it does not border on an existing neighborhood. It is surrounded on the west by commercial, on the north and east by fields, and on the south by James Court (two story) Apartments. Aspen Hills is also connected to shopping and other services by sidewalks. Valeri Heights, as it is proposed here, is not compatible with the existing neighborhood. We believe that those residents living around this property would look more favorably on a proposed development which includes: 1. Only two-story apartments 2. Better buffering with the single family subdivision 3. Self -containment without traffic into the subdivision 4. A traffic signal at Ten Mile and Pine S. Compliance with any additional recommendations ACHD makes. At this point in time, we respectfully request that Meridian City Council either: a. Deny the annexation, zoning, and preliminary plat request, or b. Send the Valeri Heights proposal back to Ada County Highway District for further study and recommendations on the intersection of Ten Mile and Pine. Respectfully submitted, .cam.0-4 David and Irma Atkinson 1124 N. Lightning Place Meridian, ID 83642 (208)884-3739 cc: Mayor Corrie May 12, 2000 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 16, 2000 APPLICANT Gold River Companies, Inc / Vicki Welker ITEM NO. AZ 00-006 REQUEST Annexation and rezone of 12.73 acres from R -T to L -O and R-15 for proposed Valeri Heights Subdivision - northeast corner of Pine Avenue & 10 Mile AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: COMMENTS See attached P & Z Minutes See attached recommendations BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: j f f' OTHER: ae a fl7 C A CA l if P r Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Glenn F. Blaser P.O. Boz 3023 Boise, Idaho 83703 Phone: (208) 342-0842 May 12, 2000 Honorable Mayor Meridian City Council RECEIVED KiJY 15 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE Request for your approval on the "Valerie Heights Subdivision" Apartment complex is before you for your consideration. I wish to notify you that I, and almost the entire neighborhood, request that you withhold your approval for the following reasons. I. Aesthetics: This project is almost surrounded by small (10 foot wide) garages facing the center of their project. These garages are connected in long rows (150- 350 feet), presenting the rear of the garages to the neighbors or the traffic on the street. These long low buildings thus will appear as storage sheds or chicken coop sheds having no rear windows. Residence will eventually place old tires and cans behind the garages, which will be visible to the public. The 26,000 Square foot office and retail buildings will also show their rear side to the street. This will be a project with no front yards or views but will show the garbage cans and the backside of the entire complex to the rest of the city. Contemplation of the exterior views of this project are not pleasant. 2. Transition:A decent regard for the neighborhood will, at a very minimum give us a row of single family or townhouses separating the R- 4 zoning from the R-15. This plan calls for the rear end of the above mentioned garages to sit only ten feet from the existing homes in Thunder Creek Subdivision. This is blatantly so degrading to the home owners living in Thunder Creek that I would, in the event it is approved without modification of the Transitional area, appeal to the courts for damages to the residential values- (since approval by planning and zoning, we have refunded money to two people who had purchased lots in Thunder Creek; and home and lot sales have dropped off considerably). 3. Drainage: Meridian has required us to plan our Haven Cove Subdivision, based upon the likely hood of a one inch rain fall, should a one inch rain occur, one cubic feet of water would fall on every 12 sq. $.; or 43,560 cu. Ft. of water would fall on this twelve acre site. Since approximately 50 percent of the area is covered by roofs or asphalt, there isn't sufficient space in the layout of "Valerie Heights" to handle this run-off. Consequently flooding would occur on ten mile road if provisions are not made. 4. Safety: Children living in the project and going to school on the west side of Ten mile road, do not have now, a safe way to cross Ten mile. Adding over 150 additional children to the area is a matter deserving careful consideration. 5. Traffic: Everyone will speak to traffic so I can't add any insight. I am not opposed to apartment on this site, I only ask that you use moderation in going from R-4 to higher density and provide a decent transition between the two that will not destroy the property values of Thunder Creek Subdivision, the Jeppson property or Haven Cove # 9 and #10. Thank you for the many hours you put in trying to make our city a desirable place to live. Yours truly, l rQ Glenn F. Blaser Developer: Haven Cove Subdivision and Thunder Creek Subdivision WHITE, PETERSON, PRUSS, MORROW & GIGRAY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW JULIE F. GGR [SCHER F.. JOHNS 200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE NA VA OFFICE BRE BRENT J. JOHNSON N D. m.. POST OFFICE BOX 1 150 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680-1150 104 NINTH AVENUE SovTH POST OFFICE BOX 247 LLiA MoRox WILLIAM F. imou H NAMPA, IDAHO 83653-0247 TEL. 208)466-9272 (08) C CHRISTOPHER ISTDmAm H R S. NYE NYE TEL 208 288-2499 (08))288-2501 FAX 4664405 PHILIP A. PETERSON R FAX STEPHEN L. PRUSS PLEASE REPLY TO ERIC S. RossMAN MERIDIAN OFFICE TODD A. ROSSMAN DAvm M. SwARTLEY TERRENcER WHITE Apri124, 2000 J To: Staff APR 2 6 2000 Applicant Affected Property Owner(s) CI _ �' O 11 fJRIDIQN Re: Application Case No. AZ-00-0if Hearmg Date: May 2. 2000 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Staff, Applicant and/or Affected Property Owner(s): Please note that these F' d* s and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be presented to the pity Council at the public hearing on the above referenced matter by the Planning and Zoning Administrator. Due to the volume of matters which the City Council must decide, and to insure your position is understood and clear, it is im ortant to have a consistent format by which matters are presented at the public hearings be�ore the City Council. The City Council strongly recommends: That you take time to carefully review the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, and be prepared to state your position on this application by addressing the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission; and That you carefully complete (be sure it is legible) the Position Statement if you disagree with the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Position Statement form for this application is available at the City Clerk's office. It is recommended that you prepare a Position Statement and deliver it to the City Clerk prior to the hearing: if possible. If that is not possible, please present your Position Statement to the City Council at the hearing, along with eight (8) copies. The copies will be Cresented to the Mayor, Council, Planning and Zoning Administrator, Public Works and the ity Attorney. If you are a part of a ggrroup, it is strongly recommended that one Position Statement be filled out for the group, wFiich can be signed by the representative for the group. Very truly y rs, I Atto ey's Offic IY/ Meridian Planning and — ning Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 Page 15 Hawkins Clark: Yes Commissioner's this application is a City initiated application simply to rezone. It is a map correction of the Crossroads Subdivision as shown on the screen. It is currently zoned IL, the details of which were explained in the application Item number 9. The result of an historical annexation for the properties on both the east and west side of Eagle Road there. The request by staff is to rezone it from light industrial to low density residential R-4. As stated in our comments, since more than 200 property owners were effected, the City did not send individual notices but it was posted and the homeowners association president was notified. The main impact on the rezone really will be on home occupations and specifically day cares which in other zones they can do more than 6 kids with their day cares and in the R-4 they can do a maximum of 5. In terms of impact on the residents that live in Crossroads, that is really the main impact. Otherwise, it is simply a clean up of the map or the zoning map. Borup: Thank you, any questions. Do we have anyone from the public who would like to testify on this application? Seeing none, Commissioner's do we have a motion? Barbeiro: Brad, if a day care exists in that Subdivision or a home occupation exists in that Subdivision that was approved, would that be grandfathered in and continue to operate. Hawkins Clark: Yes. Brown: I would move that we close the public hearing on Item 8. Hatcher: I second the motion. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Brown: Mr. Chairman I would move that we approve the rezone request of the 76.24 acres from IL to R-4 for the existing Crossroads Subdivision by the City of Meridian. Norton: I second it. Borup: Any discussion. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES 9. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 12.73 ACRES FOR PROPOSED VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, MULTI FAMILY, TOWNHOUSE, OFFICE FROM RT TO R-15 AND LO BY VICKI WELKER —NE CORNER OF PINE AND TEN MILE ROAD: Borup: I'd like to open this public hearing and ask for a staff report. Meridian Planning and Fling Commission Meeting -- April 11, 2000 Page 16 Hawkins Clark: Yes Commission the application here as shown on the screen there is two legal parcels that are involved at the northeast corner of Ten Mile and Pine. The request is to annex the properties, they are requesting two different zones, a limited office which would be approximately 2.87 in the southwest corner and the remainder of the site to an R-15, a high density zone which would be 10.96 acres at R-15. if it is okay I will just review just the annexation and CUP and Plat or would you prefer that we just do the annexation. Borup: Go ahead and cover both. Hawkins Clark: Here is a site photo from Pine Street looking to the north. There is an existing residence in the southwest corner of the site. The request here is for on Item number 10, a conditional use permit for 128 unit apartment complex, which is situation on the site plan here in the center of the project. The limited office zone request under the annexation is here at the corner, approximately 26,000 square feet of office. They are requesting 8 townhouse lots located here along Ten Mile and then on the back side here and those are separate legal lots that they are proposing to plat. The site is currently two public roads stubbed to it from the north from Thundercreek Subdivision. One located here and one here. They are proposing to extend this one to their east boundary. There is also amenities in the complex. They are proposing a water amenity here and pool and clubhouse here situation on the south. The detailed site plans are here showing more detail of some of the specifics within the apartment complex itself and some elevations of the office building, of the clubhouse, of the garages which are located along the outside perimeter of the project. Fourplex perspective and their 16 unit perspective here. Item number 11 is the preliminary plat request. We have addressed all of these items in our memo dated March 9, 2000 to the commission and council. They are more or less platting off these legal parcels—one that would be for the office complex along with its associated parking here. Each of the townhouse lots is proposing to platted. They are of course proposing the plat these public roadways which are at ACHD fifty foot wide right of way minimums. They've got the garages. This whole apartment complex is a single legal parcel. Four townhouse lots are single are four parcels there. You do have in your packets a number of submissions from residents regarding the traffic. There is particularly to point out an April 3 letter from Wilder's to ACHD Commissioner Bivens regarding a traffic count difference. From 1997 counts to 2000 counts, about a 3 year. There is about a 5300 traffic count difference, which as the neighbors have pointed out they have brought up to the ACHD commission. The ACHD Commission had acted on it. They have put conditions on the project but as the applicants or as the neighbors point out that they acted on what they believe in incorrect numbers. Staff certainly supports that, that these numbers were out of whack and probably need to be looked at much more carefully. In terms of our role as the City from P&Z's perspective, we were looking at land use and we feel that long range with the movement of the Ten Mile interchange into the 20/20 destination plan, obviously there is no money there in the bank to build it, but it certainly seems like there is a stronger commitment on behalf of both ACHD and ITD and the City to get that Meridian Planning and ',ing Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 Page 17 interchange going. Everyone looks for promises of when it is going to be built but I think it would be poor planning to pretend it is not going to happen and I think that interchange is going to create much more —it is going to basically turn Ten Mile and Pine into a much more arterial heavily traveled corridors then they are now. In terms of planning for high density use on a future arterial, I think that makes sense. As far as the bus way project which Compass is looking at converting the railroad corridor into a bus way. They've got $25,000 to look at paving at one side of the rail to have a bus way from Nampa to Boise. This is less than 1000 feet from the rail road corridor and high density serving that corridor, we think also makes sense from a long range planning standpoint. In terms of the existing traffic and ACHD's lack of recommending a center turn lane, they did not recommend any signalization, certainly you see the logic in that and feel that that probably justifies waiting for the ACHD and taking a hard look and continuing this tonight. Thanks. Brown: Has ACHD acted on this then. Hawkins Clark: Yes. Brown: And their recommendation was similar to the previous one that we had before when we looked at this same site. Hawkins Clark: Commissioner Brown I am sorry I did not go back and compare the staff reports from ACHD for their previous application and this one. I don't know what the specific recommendation differences were. I do know the center lane was not requested on either one. Brown: The Comprehensive Plan calls this property to be what kind of density. Hawkins Clark: A mixed residential. It does not call out a specific density, but we have interrupted mixed residential to mean that it would not be single family residential because we do have a single family residential designation in the Comprehensive Plan. Mixed residential is a separate designation. There is no density call out, but we certainly think that that means that is would call for a combination of densities, if not high density. Particularly on a high traffic corridor like this with potential bus service probably going down Pine and they are being asked to construct sidewalks along the both Ten Mile and Pine. I would point out, the Ada County Highway District letter dated April 3`d from Joe Rosenlund who is the traffic engineering supervisor and he is addressing this traffic count difference. He said they did not count the traffic volume on Pine Street during the earlier period but it is likely that a similar increase has occurred there and their estimating the traffic on Pine to be about 2600 vehicles per day. ACHD has not done an investigation of the Ten Mile Pine intersection but these volume numbers indicate that it may be time to install turn lanes, an all way stop or both. The date of the action by Ada County Commission was March 8, 2000. Meridian Planning and �`,ing Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 Page 18 Brown: Brad, one more item. The office use then with your mixed designation is acceptable for this zone also or for this area. Hawkins Clark: Yes, it would be. Borup: Any other questions from the Commission? We do have 3 separate hearings on this project. Staff did do his report on all three but we do need to handle them one at a time so they all are separate hearings. We'd like to proceed with Item number 9 request for annexation and zoning. Is the applicant or representative here this evening. Bailey: Good evening ladies and gentlemen and Commissioner's my name is David Bailey. I am representing Gold Rivers Company, Vicki Welker as the project engineer for the Valeri Heights project. I guess before I get started, I'll ask the question, I have my comments all put together for all three projects or for all three applications and if I could make all of those comments at this point and save us some time in the later hearings, is that acceptable. Borup: How would you like to handle it Commissioner's? No body cares, okay go ahead. Bailey: I also have here with me comments to make and then a short presentation by Scott Harrison who has done the design and the renderings for the buildings on the site. Pat Dobie, Dobie Engineering is the traffic engineer for the project and Michael Markeezee who is a property manager representative of the owner. I think some of you have seen this project previously and then some of you haven't, so I'd like to go through some of the issues associated with that. Previously we submitted this project as 164 units and a smaller 3/ size of this office building. We had some issues with some tandem parking that were shown on the previous plat where there were parking stalls that were immediately behind the garages. There was some issues about lack of open space and how it was combined within the site. The buildings were single row and spread out around the site. They were along the perimeter of the site. There was some issues with the circulation with the site and one of the things that did not come up in the hearing but was submitted with the plans was there was significant grading required to make the site work with the previous plan we had. We've taken those issues into account. The issues whereby the commission and the council thought that wasn't an appropriate project previously and have tried to move all of those into this project design. Our current project has thirty less units at 128 apartments. They are R-15 zoned and has 8 townhouses that Brad had pointed out. We've changed the layout of the site so that the circulation we believe is quite a bit better and the apartment units are contained in a closer area within the center of the site. As I said, there is 30 less of those units all together. The garages are along the perimeter of the site which provides some landscaping area behind them and also the garage is a buffer from the residential zone to the north of this. The property to the east of this is undeveloped and also not in the City so it is under the same question as to what is going to happen with that property there. The buildings have integral landscape courtyard that are between each Meridian Planning and Ding Commission Meeting -- April 11, 2000 Page 19 of the buildings where by the entries are between the two sections of the buildings. That would be landscaped in that area and that would be the entry way. There would be a common area there that would be landscaped also. It also takes the entrances away from the view from the road and I think improves the appearance overall. The units each have balconies associated with them. Most of them front and rear and all of them at least on the rear. We do have the top lot which we were able to provide in there. The water amenity in the center of the project and walk ways 5 foot throughout the project to provide good pedestrian circulation. You'll also see the dark spots that are there on the driveway showing stamped concrete or colored concrete in there to break up the flow of traffic in there and indicate the walk ways to pedestrians within the site. We have fairly extensive landscape provided on this and we submitted some drawings to the City as well as far as the type of landscape and the type of trees that we are going to put into the site. That would be professionally maintained for the apartment complex and for the townhouse lots. We plan to meet with the buildings of ADA and the Fair Housing requirements will be met. We have 304 parking spaces provided for the apartment complex portion and that comes up to 2.375 per unit. The base requirements for the zone would be 2 per unit and then the commission or council could require an additional 1 parking spot for every three units. An additional .3, so we exceed that requirement also if you would go up to the full amount required. I think the apartment complexes that you've been looking at in other areas that have been proposed are staying with the two or slightly above. A significant number of those spaces are garage style spaces. There is actually 1.2 garage spaces per unit. Each unit would have an assigned garage space. Those units vary and there is 18 one bedroom, 78 two bedroom and 32 three bedroom shown on here. We believe that there is the demand for the apartments in the area. One the previous application Vicki had submitted a list of personnel who signed up that they would like to rent in this area and I think Mr. Markeezee will state some more about the waiting list that are currently on the books in Meridian here at Aspen Hills and the issue that apartments are a needed item in Meridian. There is a two car garage for each of the townhomes. 26,000 square foot office space LO zone. The staff had made some recommendations as to some specified uses in the LO zone that should be restricted from use and the developer agrees with those restrictions. It is split into three sections. It has the patio area near the street there. The idea is to make a nice appearance from the street but also screen the apartment complex both from the noise of what we think will be a busy intersection at some point in the future and from the view into the site. The covenants that were submitted with the project would not allow any advertising on the outside of that building. The only advertising that would be allowed would be monument sign at each of the entrances of the office building or entrances to the site. Any signage that would be on the front window inside the site. We had previously had two access points on Ten Mile and one on Pine. We have deleted the access on Ten Mile that is closer to the intersection in order to make one to reduce the possibility of cut through traffic within the site which now we feel is very minimal. We continue the public streets as required by ACRD. We are proposing to tile the Ten Mile stub drain that is in the intersection of Pine and Ten Mile and that would give us room there to provide a center turn and right turn lane. I will hold off on the ACHD things for right now. We do have 5 foot sidewalks Meridian Planning and "� ing Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 Page 20 along Pine and Ten Mile. There are center turn lanes required by ACHD at each of our entrances. The utilities are available to the site and one of the base requirements for an apartment complex in your zoning code is that it be adjacent to arterial streets. Ten Mile is now classified as a minor arterial. I believe that Pin Street is a major collector street at this point but in your Comprehensive Plan is a goal to upgrade Pine Street to an arterial street. We think that this provides a good transition from the proposed commercial to the south of this which would be on the south side of Pine Street north of the railroad tracks. There is all ready industrial south of Pine Street on the west side of this project with the storage area. The buffer of those residential areas from this potentially busy intersection we think is an important issue also. We have tried to minimise the impact that this project would have on the residential while minimizing the impact that the streets and the industrial commercial would have on this project as well. Compass has reviewed this, the community planning association and thinks this is an appropriate place for this type of development and that is supports their goals as far as long range planning for the valley. Ada County Highway District. I am going to let Pat talk to this a little more in a minute but I do want to bring up the point that Ada County Highway District has acted on this project and we agree with Mrs. Wilder and with the staff and with ACHD that this ought to be reviewed as far as what we need to do on this. We also think the traffic numbers that they came up with the 8500 on Ten Mile and the traffic numbers on Pine are still within the capacity of those streets at this point. How do you get improvements done on those streets as we need to get close to the capacities or at least be heading in that direction then ACHD releases those funds to improve those streets. In the mean time we are will to and we are going to propose to put in the center turn lane on Pine so there would be a left and right turn lane from Pine. That is a serious for the school right now. The traffic stacks up on Pine trying to get onto Ten Mile. We would support and we will put them in if we can and do the traffic study work that we can. Put stop signs in there and if we could do it we would consider supporting or helping to fund a traffic signal at that intersection if ACHD thinks that is appropriate. We think that as the project sits it improves the situation at the intersection. Your going to hear the neighbors tell you that I am wrong on that and you'll just to decide for yourself who is heading in the right direction. They live there and see it every day and I can't say that I do. We have to rely on what the traffic numbers tell us and what ACHD requires the developer to do. We are willing to do what ever it takes to make that intersection right. I did want to cover one issue here. The neighbors here in a petition to you had listed some issues on the front of that and traffic was one of them. I see their concern in that area. We'd like to be able to solve that problem. Traffic on those roads are going to increase with or without this development. There is a lot of other issues that could increase the traffic significantly more than this project could. That apartment area would be private property in that area so if we could work with the fire department if we needed to, to restrict that further we could. They stated in there that the application was previously denied both by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council and that was due to traffic on Ten Mile and Pine intersection. I think we are doing our best to address that issue with this application. We only currently two residential lots that would be adjacent to this property. We have significantly reduced the density of the development from the previous application. Another comment the Meridian Planning and — ning Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 Page 21 neighbors had was that the proposed Comprehensive Plan is out dated and as far as I understand it is still current and we submitted this plan under that Comprehensive Plan and we also think that the Comprehensive Plan for what is proposed in that area is appropriate. They brought up the issue to the schools and we this has been review by the schools and the schools are not recommending that you deny this project based on the capacity. In summary we think the Comprehensive Plan supports this project as far as we understand that your Comprehensive Plan does. We think that the transportation issues support this project and that this can be a benefit to the transportation system rather than a detriment. We thing that is provides a good buffer between commercial and industrial areas and we think we can resolve the traffic issues. We think Meridian needs apartments and there is a demand for it. This is the right place and time and plan for this site. I'd be happy to answer any questions. Norton: Mr. Bailey I am not sure if it is you or someone else to address the issue. Do you still plan on having a tot lot for your apartment complex. Bailey: Yes it is shown. Norton: How far is that from your water feature. Bailey: I would say that is probably 150 feet or 100 feet. Norton: How deep is your lighted water feature. Bailey: I've got to say I don't know the answer. Barbeiro: Mr. Bailey could you describe for me how you would set up the stop signs on a offset where Pine and Ten Mile meet. Bailey: The Pine Street comes into Ten Mile as a Tee. The offset is only slightly offset from the Pine Street. I don't know the answer as far as whether that meets offset requirements for being directly across from it or if that is something that would need to be repaired. There is actually a stop sign there now and on Pine Street. We would be adding a stop sign at Ten Mile north and south of Pine Street. At some point in the future that would be improved with the intersection. Barbeiro: Can you tell me what the distance is from the intersection to your first entrance on Pine. Bailey: On Pine Street approximately 330 feet. It is over the ACHD requirement. Norton: Are these considered public roads within your complex. Bailey: They are not. It would be a driveway area within the project. Lightning and Gray Cloudway would be public streets. The rest private driveway. Meridian Planning and '-- iing Commission Meeting -- April 11, 2000 Page 22 Norton: Your comment regarding reducing any cut through traffic, are you referring to adding gates to your area again. Bailey: I was referring to that but don't know if it is possible with the fire codes. Borup: Thank you Mr. Bailey. Mr. Dobie want to spend some time at this point. Dobie: Mr. Chairman, Commissioner's my name is Pat Dobie. I am a traffic engineer. I prepared a traffic study for the Valeri Heights project. I prepared a supplemental analysis which was submitted and review by the Ada County Highway District dealing with the revised site plan and also dealing with high school traffic which was overlooked in the first analysis. As far as the existing intersection of Ten Mile and Pine, there is a lot of problems out there. Primarily the lack of turn lanes neither on Pine or Ten Mile. The radius of the curves are defined. They are narrow. No sidewalks in the area and peaking problems from the high school traffic. As it currently exists the level of service at the intersection A thru F has a D rating. During peak hours left turn movements off both roads has a service level of F. This is a condition you would experience on Eagle Road most of the day. What ACHD required when they approved the Subdivision was to widen the roads at the intersection to their standards, to install left turn lanes, to construct sidewalks, to change the traffic control at the intersection and over all bring it up to the configuration of a modern intersection. In addition to that they are going to require that the developer contribute $165,000 in impact fees to be used by the highway district to deal with offsite mediation of traffic impacts. The issue has been raised about the relevancy of traffic courts that we used in some of these previous analysis. I'd like to say that it's really a mood point. Those traffic counts were not used in any of these analysis. The analysis was all based upon peak hour traffic loadings and those peak hour counts were collected manually at the intersection in the months of July 1999. Additional counts collected in November 1999 during the school and there were additional counts collected in February of 2000. Noon time peak hour counts to try to profile what was going on with the high school traffic during the lunch break which is typically the peaking period for high school pupils. In that analysis, what was counted in July 1999 was 780 vehicles per hour on Ten Mile Road. This is the evening rush hour peak. The more recent count that was collected by the Idaho Transportation Dept. This is the count that Joe Roselin refers to in his letter amounts to about 850 vehicles per hour in November 1999. The difference between the two is roughly 9 per cent and plus or minus 10 percent is the variation that you can see in any two counts taken. Statistically the counts are the same. To establish a level of comfort here, again 780 vehicles per hour were measured one time, 850 vehicles another time. My analysis was based upon a traffic loading of 1200 vehicles per hour on Ten Mile Road. In addition I assumed a traffic loading of 770 vehicles per hour on Pine Street. What exists out there right now is about 250 vehicles per hour. There was a substantial increase in traffic loading on Pine and the reason I did that was because of recommendations from Compass that Pine was going to pick up in duty over the next 5 years. The traffic volumes that were considered in the analysis are considerable higher than anything that Meridian Planning and ling Commission Meeting " April 11, 2000 Page 23 has been measured out there. Generally I tend to inflate ACHD counts and in the Meridian area I inflate Compass counts a lot because they tend to under estimate the traffic out here. The analysis was based upon 1200 vehicles per hour. Based upon that traffic loading, what I found was with the improvements that ACHD has recommended, the level of service at the intersection will maintain the current level of D. END OF SIDE TWO Dobie: increase of traffic plus all the site generated traffic of the 1400 vehicles per day that is being projected from this development. The service level at that intersection after the improvements have been made that ACHD has required will re-establish a service level of D. D is an acceptable standard adopted by both the City, the highway district and Compass. In addition to that, Gold River Company has offered to construct a traffic signal. A signal is justified because of the noon time peak traffic generated by the high school and future traffic conditions that will exist once the Ten Mile Road has been established and the interchange has been constructed on the highway. With the traffic signal at that intersection what you'll have is a service level of A. As I started out saying there are currently problems at the intersection and in this community the way that road problems get fixed is through new development. ACHD does not fund very much construction with their own money. They tend to use other peoples money. There is an opportunity here through development exaction's and the payment of impact fees to make substantial changes to that location. If the project isn't approved, then these improvements probably will not happen until ACHD comes through with some sort of comprehensive program in conjunction with a new interchange on the freeway and it is in the 20 year plan but it could take 20 years before it materialized. Based upon the rate of change of traffic we've noticed there could be some fairly substantial congestion. That ends my comments. Borup: Any questions for Mr. Dobie. Barbeiro: (Inaudible) the developer would pay for a complete stop light at that intersection or contribute to a fund that would later be put in there. Dobie: If a traffic signal is installed under a cooperative program with the highway district, ACHD allows the developer to use their impact fees to pay for a portion of the signal. ACHD also contributes the hardware and installation of the signal. There is an opportunity to do it at this point of time and there are capital resources that are available to fund it. Barbeiro: Then could you reassure the neighbors that if this development were to go in that a stop light would go in conjunction with that based upon the developers contribution or would it go to a future stop light. Meridian Planning and ping Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 Page 24 Dobie: It is a question of applying the capital of this being generated by the project. I spoke to several of the staff engineers at ACHD and they said they would be supportive of a traffic signal. Barbeiro: I think you know where I am going with this. The developer has the opportunity to pay for the entire stop light at that corner and then be reimbursed at a later time. Dobie: Well this development has generated enough impact fees to pay the full cost of traffic signal. It is not a question of waiting for additional development. It is a question of negotiating a cooperative agreement with the highway district. Barbeiro: With the stop light you would allow for 20,000 vehicles per day and that would keep that intersection at a 8 level of service. Dobie: At 20,000 you'd be upper C approaching D. Barbeiro: Would that be considering a five lane road in both directions. Dobie: That would be with a two lane road—I'm sorry a three lane road. Barbeiro: Did you perform the count at lunchtime? Okay. What was the stacking at Pine going back to the east. Dobie: Six or seven vehicles. Hatcher: In your site observation when you were doing your traffic count, did you also observe and do counts when school let out. Dobie: No I didn't. The system peaks between 4:30 and 5:30 and the traffic during that period was measured. The traffic in the morning and the traffic at noon was measured. Hatcher: But you didn't measure it throughout the day. Dobie: No, it's only the high school traffic that is effected by that. Hatcher: I live in the area and see it on a daily basis, so I know why all these people are here. I wanted to know where you counts were coming from and what time. When high school lets out it backs up about'/2 mile. A signal or left turn lane would improve it. I agree. Borup: Any other questions. Thank you. Does that include the applicants presentation. No, one more. Meridian Planning and ding Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 Page 25 Harrison: Mr. Chairman and fellow Commissioner's my name is Scott Harrison. I am with As -Built Systems and I am the designer on this project. So far we have talked about dirt and cars and now I'd like to talk to you about the buildings. One of the things that was brought up in a previous meeting and I did not elaborate too much on it was the actual construction of the buildings. I would like to focus on that first. As with any of these types of projects, one of the concerns is cost. What usually happens is we are faced with the prospect of well how we going to pay for it if we go cheap and it's not going to be a good project. If we go too expensive then we've blown it. What we settled on was the typical treatment that you would see in an apartment complex here in Boise which is asphalt composite shingles, a minimum 40 year life. We looked at several other types from metal to clay type and concrete type. Cost wise we settled on the best one we could find and that the composite asphalt shingle. If we move down along the side of the building and look at the siding, again you are looking at different ways to veneer these buildings. We looked at all of them and the one we are settling on right now is the masonite hard board siding with an optional textured aluminum siding. I brought samples here if you'd like to see them. They have come a long way as they are durable and attractive. There is low maintenance, no painting. Moving to the window treatments we settled on single hung (inaudible) coating with architectural grids. White vinyl frames. With respect to the stairways, this side of the building those are constructed of wood and would meet the minimum rise and run requirements. All hand rails, 38 inches in height. As far as the building itself interior building we are looking at a tight five construction. The buildings will be sprinkled. Each building will have gutters and down spouts and will drain directly. I'd like to address quickly the wall construction would be 2X6 minimum R19 and that would also go for the office building as well. Each of the buildings will have ADA accessibility at the first floor level. All buildings will have minimum 3 foot exterior doors and on the interior spaces we have designed in the floor plans 5 foot minimum radius turns in the kitchen, bath to meet ADA requirements. At least one bathroom in each of the units will be completely ADA on the main level. Borup: Mr. Harrison we need only a summary on the building. Harrison: In a nut shell that is about it. Barbeiro: On the bottom of the drawing there, that 2 or 3 courses of CMU or is that slab that I am looking at. Harrison: That is actually the base of a structural slab. Borup: Thank you. Did you have anything to follow up with? Harrison: A comment was recently brought up about the monument signs. We do have a picture of those I'll show you real quick. This also shows the colored perspectives of some of the ;..proposed shots. These are brick and marble signs. The commercial sign is slotted in marble so the businesses can put their names on those. Meridian Planning and ling Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 Page 26 Borup: Thank you. Does that conclude the applicants presentation. One more. Markeezee: In interest of time I will be brief. Mr. Chairman and Commissioner's my name is Michael Martkeezee. I am a professional property manager the owner of Summit Real Estate Services which is based in Boise. I have been in the property management business all most exclusively with multi family products since 1980. Currently I manage 14 different projects, approximately 900 units. The product you may be most familiar with would be Aspen Hills Apartments. It is 120 units up on Meridian Road. To my knowledge the largest project in Meridian and probably the nicest. I've been asked to consult with the development of the project regarding management issues to develop a project that could be well managed and based on my experience with the Aspen Hills apartments there is clearly a demand for more housing. Reviewing this project the site plans that I have received, it is clearly a luxury type building with adequate amenities and very well presented. One of the outstanding features is the parking. A luxury building of this type will attract a tenant profile that is more professional. There is less management problems with a project of this type. We engage law enforcement ahead of time. It is a crime prevention through environmental design. It is were a trained professional looks at plans ahead of time and gives advice. I have met with them regarding this project and a statement will come out regarding their perceptions. I have worked through many types of management issues, which are preventative type programs. Before someone can move there we have certain qualifying procedures that checks credit and criminal background. We also have risk management programs dealing with neighborhood watch. In summary there are professional management practices which can be employed to create and maintain a quality living environment. Thank you. Norton: Sir, with your experience with these type of apartments, what do you expect the general rent would be charged for this type of apartment. Markeezee: One bedroom would be in the $600's. Two bedrooms would be in the $700's and three bedrooms would in $800's. Depends upon location and view. We will do the management if they get built. Borup: Thank you sir. Commissioner's are we ready for public testimony. Would we like to proceed with that or would this be_ a good time for a break. We will take a short break and during that time, let's consult on dates. Borup: If everyone could gather round we'd like to continue. We like to continue the public hearing on this application. We have some concern on being able to get through the agenda. We've talked about some alternatives. Commissioner Brown you said you wanted to discuss that now or do you want to wait. Brown: Mr. Chairman, at least to the people that are here, we should find out how many people are here for the Carol Project. Can I see a show of hands. Okay so every body is here for the project we are on. Our hearing will go way late and we told Meridian Planning and ding Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 Page 27 commissioner Borup we don't want to go to 2am anymore. We can't make good decisions at 2 o'clock. I know there is lengthy discussion on Item 12. We probably have at least another hour or so on this one. Borup: I think if we can get this rapped up in a hour without continuing it that we have a good chance of getting through the rest of the agenda. Just as a warning, we don't go past 1 o'clock anymore. Let's go ahead and start and see how we do and then we may need to take a look at it in an hour from now. In able to give everyone a chance to testify, we would like to limit to three minutes. If someone here is speaking on behalf of the neighborhood as a whole, in that situation there is extra time. Do we have a neighborhood spokesman here. Walters: Reese Walters. I live at 1148 N. Lightning Place. Two houses down from the complex. I have a petition here that has 171 signatures and that is at Haven Cove alone. I was planning on going across the street to Park Creek and am sure I could get another 300 signatures over there. Borup: How many people here tonight are you speaking for? Can we see a raise of hands. Go ahead then. Walters: Did all of the Commissioner's get a copy of the petition? You all ready know the points. Should I go over those points –okay the only thing new that I have is I asked the police dept. to tell me how many traffic tickets they gave out. There was a one week span where Pine was being under construction right at that intersection and diverted high school students into Haven Cove. In that 5 day span of time, six speeding tickets were given on Forecast and several complaints were listed by residents. That is the only new thing I have new from the petition. The people who live right here on this lot had somebody come about 45-50 mph –this is a ditch—and went screaming right through their yard into the ditch, came out of their yard and peeling out in their new grass and took off before the cops could get there. If we put this in we will have so much traffic. It will be those high school students. Brown: With the applicants discussion about the traffic improvement that they are improving at that intersection, do you not believe it will make it better. Walters: I came in right as they were talking about that. I did hear a possibility of a traffic light. Hatcher: (Inaudible—not on mic) Walters: My concern would be that those 250 cars would be backing up that intersection. Maybe if you put a turn lane and light in there now, that would make a difference, but if you put it in there and then add another 250 cars to the area, it will be the same thing as it is now. Another thing is that if we back up and go back to Franklin and Overland between 7:30 and 8 in the morning or 3 and 5 in the evening, you're got Meridian Planning and —ling Commission Meeting —" April 11, 2000 Page 28 15 to 20 cars backed up on all four lanes. I did hear him refer to the traffic study. That was done in August of 99. 1 believe there is a new study done on Ten Mile just last week but I did not see it on Pine. Barbeiro: Can you comment on how the traffic would be improved with the stop light, turn lane with the inclusion of that corner development. Walters: I don't have all the stats and I don't know—I am not a traffic expert. I don't think that's true. I just know when I am out there on Pine trying to turn right at 3 o'clock, you've got a pile up, and if you add more — Atkinson: I am Irma Atkinson. I live at 1124 N. Lightning. I will be brief. You have a multi paged packet I left yesterday. I'd like to focus my comments on the conversation that Mrs. Wilder and I had. When we visited with the Ada County Highway District staff on the 29th, we specifically asked them what if the developer agrees to put in stop signs. Tonight we are hearing a traffic signal. He said it is not that simple. You can't just say I am going to put in a traffic stop light. I disagree with Mr. Dobie. If they are a mute point they why did they suddenly put the traffic counter out a week ago today after Mrs. Wilder and I submitted our letters of concern to the Commissioner's at ACRD. I think it is a very important point. We have sent letters to the Commissioner's. We will be following up with them. We are asking them to reconsider their decision to work with the developer. This is too important to rush ahead on. I respectively ask you to table it hold it or deny it at this point until we get the information we need regarding the traffic. In the Comprehensive Plan's both the current one and proposed one is says we want people living near public services. Well their an island with sidewalks that go nowhere. They can't walk to schools or parks. There are no employers there so they have to get in their car and drive and just adds to the problem. Wilder: Commissioner's, Chairman Borup my name is Laura Wilder, I live at 3401 W. Pine Avenue not Pine Lane. Pine Lane is off of Black Cat and this is on the books with ACHD as Pine Avenue even though it is a private drive. In the current Comprehensive Plan for the City of Meridian, this is listed as a general industrial area. Right now there are 8 families on acreages that live there. The only access we have to the world is this intersection at Ten Mile and Pine. This is the only way that we have out. That is why we are terribly concerned about traffic numbers that don't matter. They do matter. I would like to speak tonight in opposition of this rezoning and development. I will speak on two major points. One I have a few more things about traffic and another one just about the general character of the area. First of all a lot of people have talked about the intersection tonight. i have photos of the intersection and how this lines up. This is the intersection of Ten Mile and Pine. The reality is this is an inadequate intersection in a rural transition area that has a lot of work to be done before it can support this project. This is where we go to turn left or right. Borup: Have you seen the ACHD report. Meridian Planning and ling Commission Meeting "— April 11, 2000 Page 29 Wilder: Yes I have, not the one they started last week. We saw the letter that was in the file dated March 8th on which they recommended approval of the project. After we went and spoke to them they realized that they had used inadequate outdated information and began to recognize that further study was needed. They talked about warrants but before they would be able to write the requirements they needed to study the traffic further. I have seen those requirements. They were given based on the old numbers. After we brought to Mr. Roslin's attention the new numbers he really felt further study of the intersection was needed. Everyone had information from ACHD that was outdated and this has a ripple effect for the entire project. It is not fair for anyone who is trying to make a decision about approval to not have up to date information. We do recommend that you postpone acting on this until they have studied the situation further. The issue there has been much said about zoning. Multi level density is in the plan right now. We feel that 50 people who spent 7 months working on the new proposed Comprehensive Plan, they have identified this area as medium density which is up to R-8, single family dwellings, not high density. We feel like if we go ahead and ignore the work that they have done and the recommendation that they are making, it is a slap in the face to the planning and zoning process on what people more recently have studied the whole picture. We see apartments being out of place at that corner. Many people have moved that area because they like the single family homes. People move there to raise their family and are not expecting apartments in the area. One thing that does concern me is the tendency of company's such as Hewlett Packard use these for relocation until their families have found homes. Are there ordinances about short stays, this kind of thing. If you do decide to go ahead and approve this even though the traffic infrastructure is not there and there are compelling safety issues with the sidewalks and roads and intersection, I would ask you please to look at the ordinances. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. END OF SIDE THREE Barbeiro: The developer would like to make that intersection a three lane road with a turn lane in both directions with a stop light. If this commission were to recommend to City Council approval of this development would that improvement be sufficient for your concerns. Wilder: It would definitely help the traffic situation. One improvement that I think is still a concern even though they are putting sidewalk on their side of the road, there are no improvements on the other side of Ten Mile. Prior to the time that is made there are some issues regarding the narrowness of the road and the lack of bike lanes. I do feel the signal would definitely help. Barbeiro: So the signal with addition of turn lanes would not be sufficient for your concerns. Wilder: Not at this time. Meridian Planning and ling Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 Page 30 Hatcher: Mr. Chairman I just want to make a comment. Mrs. Wilder your concern about developing the west side of Ten Mile. The only time that we are going to see the west side of Ten Mile improved or developed without an adjacent development going in is when ACHD makes that development. Wilder: I am aware of that but I think it is an extreme hazard. Hatcher: Correct and half of that wideness that your talking about would occur with the development of this project on the east side. The development on the west side would only occur as if your neighbor develops. I know where your going and what your concerns are. Blazer: My name is Glenn Blazer. I live at 3405 Stone Creek Road. Boise. I am going to try and control myself tonight. What percentage of this project is covered with roofs or asphalt. Would it be 50%. The reason I bring this up is I think the City planning projects are a little remiss in their duties. I talks to Keith Jacobson who is the engineer who has designed all the drainage for our Subdivisions and every thing that should be designed for a rain of one inch. If there were a one inch rain on that project and it is 50% covered with asphalt and roofs there would b 20,000 cubic feet of water. There is no adequate place for that water to go. They are allowed to run the usual amount of water that has been draining into the canal into the canal. The rest of it should be (inaudible) on the project. According to Mr. Jacobson it would take 15 ponds 24 inches square and 2 feet deep to do that. There is not room for them to do that. When you have a project that does not have public parking but private parking, the police are . powerless to go in and regulate the parking. This particular case the driveway through the parking is 25 feet wide. The garages are 10 feet wide and adequately depths. A car backing out of that garage into a 20 foot right of way completely blocks the street. If you have 200 cars in a day going around there, there has got to be congestion. Another thing, I think Planning and Zoning duty and original purpose was to help make the City more beautiful. In this project we have a commercial zone that's rear end to the street. The front of the buildings face the interior. The people who live in the apartments know what it looks like. Around the exterior of the apartments you have these long rows of garages. I control the lots in Thundercreek just north and we will be privileged to look out and see a long row of garages, sheds. It looks like a storage sheds. I wonder if that is giving adequate and due consideration to us who have spend money in making single family homes and trying to develop it. Looks to me like the apartment house projects I have driven around in Boise lately the main apartment face the road. They reversed that from the last time and I was not satisfied that time, but this is—think about children from our Subdivision the little ones have to cross Ten Mile. You add another 50-75 children, they have to get across. That is not reasonable to subject little children to that. Barbeiro: Bruce could you give us a Readers Digest version of his drainage concern so that could be answered right away. Meridian Planning and ling Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 Page 31 Freckleton: Mr. Chairman members of the Commission, ordinance does require for them to retain their drainage on site. In many instances developers are allowed to use existing drainage ditches for pre -development volumes, if that is allowed by the irrigation district. They have to approach them for approval. Mr. Bailey could probably speak to the volumes of water and his proposed methods of handling that volume. The current City Ordinance does require retention of water on site. Fuller: My name is Shirley Fuller. I live at 890 N. Ten Mile. I'd like to start out by saying that I'd like to apologize to our neighbor. There has been a lot of heated discussion this and misunderstandings. For them I'd like to clear up a couple of issues. We've been in this for a long time. When my husband and I decided to put the property up for sale we were approached by 3 developers. One wanted to put 4 homes per acre and do nothing with the corner. He did not want to address fixing the corner. We do not want to leave this property a site. We want to fix it. We want to go away and say we did something good. We lived there 9 years and know it is a problem. It is not going to get any better folks. The second developer came along and you know what he told me. I'll buy the 10 acres, you keep the 2 acres and the corner. You keep it for commercial. I don't want anything to do with it. We did not go along with him either. Vicki Welker came along and she said I'll fix the corner but I have to have enough money to do that. I have to have a project so I can do that. She has changed this project I don't 'now how many times. She has thousands of dollars wrapped up in this. She has tried to please everyone. We think we have a good project. We are doing the best we can. Neighbors I'm sorry. We want to have a good quality neighborhood where the corners are fixed, that's our goal. Fuller: My name is Dave Fuller. I am co-owner of the piece of property. What most of the neighbors worry about traffic. We live on that corner. We been listening to them traffic counters every night. We can't sleep. You see our concern. We are going to have more traffic. This is a prime piece of ground. It is a corner. Something needs to be done for the betterment of the community. We've been to the new Planning and Zoning proposed 10 year plan, 5 year plan and what it shows that most of these folks don't really realize there is a big block of ground over by the high school is all planned high density. We are discussing 100 units plus here. That big acreage down by the high school just a few feet down the road could house thousands of apartments. You talk about move traffic. I said this before, who has more right to use the road than the local people living right there at the intersection or on the road than all the people that commute from Ustick, McMillan clear over by the golf course, all the way to Black Cat use that road. There will be more traffic. I am in favor of it. I hope you folks are. Norton: Mr. Fuller do you live close to this area. Fuller: I live on that area. Norton: Are you going to be staying there. Meridian Planning and ling Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 Page 32 Fuller: No, I have to leave. I am a farmer/rancher. I have to move my operation. De Rosa: I am Joe De Rosa. I live at 1162 N. Lightning. I have two points. I find it interesting that the owner of the property mentioned that one of the developers wanted to put 4 houses per acre but was not going to fix the street. Well, I would assume he would have something to say about that. That would fit more closely in that area. Lightning and Gray Cloud both are going to be feeder roads for this apartment complex. People can look at it any way they want but they are going to go through those two streets to get out on Ten Mile. Second, the Comprehensive Plan, I was involved with it also. I went to those meetings. It has been a long process with a lot of time spent with people who care about this community. That Comprehensive Plan says that they do not want what is existing now and the new Comprehensive Plan would be R-8. That fits more closely with that Subdivision in that area. I went and looked at the packet that they provided you and one of the things I noticed was from the school board it said that Chaparral is all ready above capacity. The crowding won't be alleviated in the middle or high school until the new ones are built. Barbeiro: There is a new elementary school that will be opening Fall of this year that will cut into the Chaparral district. The new junior high school will open Fall of this year. The new high school is planned to open Fall of 2002. Brown: Mr. De Rosa I have seen hundreds if not thousands of Meridian School District comments over the last 9 years. They have always said that. I have never seem them say even in a vacant mile section where there is no houses, anything different then what you just commented on. Bailey: I think it becomes pretty clear from what we are talking about here and we'd like to emphasize that we think what we are doing here is going to make this intersection better, not worse. When you think about the traffic counts that they submitted to ACHD. It is less than a 10 percent increase on either of those roads. The increase of the level of service of the intersection is 100 fold over what it is now. I calculated the common open space we have on the site and this was concerning Mr. Blazer's question on the open space. This is usable open space. What I am referring to is the triangle areas within the project and the open space with the club house. That is about 16 percent of the site. The required for PUD is 10 percent. I don't have detailed drainage plans on the site and have looked in general what it will do and I think 20,000 cubic feet is conservative but in the ball park. There is over 2-2-1/2 acres total of green. If you took a one foot deep swale a half acre 20,000 square feet, you put that 20,000 feet in there. I have no intention of doing anything like that. Our intention is several small swales. Our only intention for using off site drainage on this would be to insure that the pond is draining. We have some historical right to drain the site to the existing drain. Typically the only thing that is used for is a under drain system or system that allows all of those ponds to drain after a storm to make sure we don't have standing water. Hope that answers that question. Meridian Planning and --ling Commission Meeting - April 11, 2000 Page 33 Barbeiro: When you said a 16 percent open space is that including the perimeter buffers. Bailey: No it is not. Brown: What is your treatment of the street going to be on the inside the street side of the sidewalk. You know when the sidewalk quits, your sidewalk the height of the ground and then you have this barrow pit, what are you doing there. How are you finishing that. Bailey: I don't have any specific plans on that. If there is requirements we need to meet on that, but I was expecting that we were going to make it just that, a barrow pit. That would not be a traveled area. It would be the shoulder of the road and barrow pit up to the sidewalk, typical of what you see on most developments. Brown: My recommendation would be when we approve those items that gets treated at least a portion of it with grass until the highway district widens the road all the way out. You could gravel a portion of it. As you drive through the new developments and continue up Ten Mile you see unfinished road, ruts whatever, that are along the side there. I would encourage that to make the city beautiful that Mr. Blazer talked about. He felt our (inaudible) was to make it look it look pretty. I think it would be in your benefit as well as the City's that that was treated. Borup: Any other questions of Mr. Bailey. Thank you very much. Brown: Correct me if I'm not mistaken, multi family developments have different traffic patterns then single family developments. Dobie: That's true. Brown: Are their peak hours the same as single family residential developments. Dobie: The overall traffic generation and the peak hour generation is about 30 percent less in multi family units then it is in single family residential. Brown: Can you speak to why that is. Your theory if nothing else as to why—it doesn't really make sense. You've got people living here and there. Why is a multi family development have different peaks or different traffic patterns. Dobie: Small kids. You shuttle kids around all day to music lessons, etc. Brown: So in multi family developments usually they don't have a large amount of children. Is that what your telling me. Meridian Planning and '—iing Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 Page 34 Dobie: There is different demographics. There is more retired people who don't have to commute to work and they don't have a lot of dependents living with them. It has to do with the demographics. Barbeiro: I'd like to ask a question of Mr. Markeezee please. One of the neighbors asked about the transient nature of this type of apartment complex and people coming in for short term. Could you answer that question for the neighbors please. Markeezee: I don't know why short term residents would be any more of a problem. Is the quality of a short term stay a corporate housing person more difficult, more criminal oriented, more destructive oriented then a regular resident. I am not sure why that is a issue I guess. Barbeiro: My guess would be that a short term person has little or no investment in the community. Markeezee: Typically corporate housing are professionals that come from top companies in the area. They don't come in to tear it up. I don't see the issue there. It has not been a problem at our properties to my knowledge. Barbeiro: As you currently the property managers for Aspen Hills, could you tell me how many people are there on a short term. Markeezee: I don't have the exact but I can tell you a very small percentage. What we do is have a 12 month lease rate. If somebody wants to be there for 6 months, they are charged a high rate, 3 months a higher rate. Borup: Anything from any other Commissioner's. Okay. How would we like to proceed? Hatcher: I move we close the public hearing. Pearson: My name is Brian Pearson. I live at 1158 N. Clara which is just north of the apartment complex. While my home was being built, I lived in the Clock Tower Apartment Complex and that was the home that was being built by the builder who assured me that it was single family dwellings just south of me by the way, but what tends to happen what you consider a luxury apartment complex and I don't see where this is different is that at $800 a month for a 3 bedroom, you won't find —it is not a real family type dwelling place. What you will find is folks that can pay $800 would rather put that into a house payment. What you'll find at Clock Tower and I would not expect much difference here, it might start that way, but after a while is what you have is 3 single folks sharing rent in a 3 bedroom apartment. A lot of the traffic densities are (inaudible) by the fact that you got 3 cars per dwelling, or two. Compounding that, these tend to be socially active folks, real entertaining in nature. It starts with the best of intentions, but economics come into play and there is a profitability factor. They have to Meridian Planning and "—iing Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 Page 35 keep them full any way they can. There was a retiree there with a 12 month lease and talk to that person sometime. I wanted to point that out because your concerned with the exchange of ownership in the community but I think the life style and dwelling mode of these kind of places that is a different point you should consider. Barbeiro: Does your property directly butt up against this property. Pearson: No, it's to the north. Brown: I move we close the public hearing. Hatcher: I second it. Borup: Any discussion. All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Barbeiro: With regards to Mr. & Mrs. Fuller's commentary on their property. It is unusual that they would oppose multi family housing in the property adjacent to theirs and then (inaudible) on their own property. I am overly compelled by 170 signatures from Haven Cove alone and do not doubt that you could get 200 additional signatures from other neighbors. While this does not apply, because there is a preliminary draft, several of the neighbors did make reference to the preliminary draft of the new Meridian Comprehensive Plan. I believe that they would equally disapprove of a commercial development directly to the south of this project, but the new preliminary draft Comprehensive Plan does call for commercial development directly south and kiddy corner from this project. And, since it does call for medium density on this lot, I don't know that commercial development is really incompatible with that. Borup: Anyone else have any discussion. Anyone in the mood to compile a motion. END OF SIDE FOUR Brown: As this does comply with the current Comprehensive Plan, and is appropriate (inaudible) I would like to move that the annexation and zoning of 12.73 acres for the proposed Valeri Heights Subdivision multi family, townhouse, office from an RT to an R- 15 and LO by Vicki Welker at the northeast corner of Pine and Ten Mile Road be approved per staff recommendations. Norton: I'll second it. Borup: Motion and second, discussion. Any Commissioner's care to speak to the motion? We have no discussion. Meridian Planning and '~ ling Commission Meeting --- April 11, 2000 Page 36 Barbeiro: I need to go back to this because we are working off of the current Comprehensive Plan. If I may ask a question of staff please. Brad can you please address the current Comprehensive Plan for that corner. Hawkins Clark: Commissioner Barbeiro for the subject corner. As stated earlier, it is mixed residential designation. This does not have an a text of the Comprehensive Plan now any specific policies that speak to density or compatibility issues of neighboring properties or any such thing. What we as staff have been doing on projects that come under this designation have been comparing mixed residential to the other two types of residential that are in the Comprehensive Plan. In 1993 when the current Comprehensive Plan was designed and put together, the conversations that I had with people that were part of the process, was that they intended for that mixed residential to be something other than single family residential. I wish I could point you to a specific policy in the text that would speak to that but it is simply at this point a matter of deduction. It's designed for a combination of densities. It would allow for some types of low impact commercial or office. It does have the mixed dwelling units mixed uses which we look at from an interpretation point to comply. Barbeiro: If I may ask a question of counsel. Can we use the mixed use residential discussion in the new Comprehensive Plan as intentions for this or does this plan not apply anyway. Swartley: Mr. Chairman, Commissioner Barbeiro, that Comprehensive Plan does not apply at this time so you can not, no. Borup: Questions? Okay guess we are ready for a vote. All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: 3 AYES, 1 NAY 10. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPOSED VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, MULTI FAMILY, TOWNHOUSE, OFFICE FROM RT TO R-15 AND LO BY VICKI WELKER—NE CORNER OF PINE AND TEN MILE: Borup: Brad anything additional to add. Hawkins Clark: Chairman Borup, just to request that previous staff comments be incorporated in this item. Thanks. Borup: Does the applicant have anything they'd like to add. Would you like your previous testimony incorporated in too? All right. Anyone from the public? Need to come up fast. MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING: April 11 2000 APPLICANT: VICKI WELKER ITEM NUMBER: 9 REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONING FOR 12.73 ACRES FOR PROPOSED VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING & ZONING DEPT. CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WASTE WATER DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: COMMENTS SEE PREVIOUS PACKET OF 3/14/00 & ATTACHED MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: SANITARY SERVICE: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Q � d �- vi s LLJ C�: :9: F40Lo - � v py 2 A . 4 "O*N L+e ►rn * q, l a, I I e1 April 10, 2000 Z vo-Peh n� Q- joner �,��d Keith Borup, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission APR 10 2000 200 E. Carlton Citi, of N!L iridian Meridian, ID 83642 City Clerk Office Dear Mr. Borup, The purpose of this letter is to share with you serious concerns we have discovered as we have spent the last month researching Valeri Heights and traffic safety. We were, quite frankly, confused over how Ada County Highway Commission could approve the Valera Heights proposal and state there is no traffic problem at this intersection of Ten Mile and Pine which is less than a mile away from Meridian High School. As residents of this neighborhood, we see cars drastically exceeding the 35 mph speed limit and we see turning traffic backed up all day. We met with 4 staff members at ACRD on 3-29-2000 and explored with them the information used for their decisions. Here's what we discovered: 1. The traffic study12rovided by the developer and completed by Patrick Dobie was based on his traffic counts done on 8-6-99 when Meridian High School was not in session, No wonder their study reports there is minimal traffic at the intersection! This is a problem! 2. The traffic study by ACHD utilized information from ACHD traffic counts done on 8-26-97 and 8-28-97. Not only are these counts of 6,072 (Ten Mile south of Cheng Lane) and 1 $ (pine east of Ten Mile) extremely outdated, but (again) these traffic counts were done during the summer when Meridian High School was not in session. According to information provided by the Meridian School District Administration Office, the school year in 1997 began after Labor Day on September 2. This is a problem! 3. When ACHD Commissioners reviewed the revised oroaosal for Valeri Heiohts on 3-8-2000, they were not orovided_with the more current ACHD traffic count of 8.551 for Ten Mile north of Pine done on 11-23-99. This is an alarming increase of traffic on this road which simply was not considered. This is a problem! 4. In the traffic study_ provided by the developer, Mr. Dobie cites the COMPASS prediction of traffic for this road to reach 8,550 by the year 2005 Clearly, we are exceeding this level NOWwith no dans by ACHD to widen the road change signage, or add signals until the year 2005. This is a problem! 2 We do not believe that approving Valeri Heights (with the addition of 1,320 vehicle trips per day into this extremely inadequate intersection) is responsible planning. The safety of this intersection which is within a half mile of Chaparral Elementary School, within a mile of Meridian High School, and within a mile and a half of Meridian Middle School must be a priority and changes must be made prior to consideration of high density projects! In addition to the traffic concerns, we are also concerned about how this project fits with the current and proposed Comprehensive Plans for the City of Meridian. Regarding the current (1993) Plan,, this project is not compatible in the following ways: a. The Land Use Chapter encourages higher density development within the Old Town area and lower density development in outlying areas. This project is well gutside of this geographical area. b. It does not (from the Transportation Chapter) monitor and coordinate the compatibility of the land use, nor does it encourage proper design of residential neighborhoods to ensure their safety and tranquility. This project will contribute more traffic to an inade_auate intersection and will add pedestrians without sidewalks on both roads involved C. It does not (from the Housing chapter) provide for the development of housing close to employment and shopping centers. There are no employers close to this project There is a store a half mile away, but there are no sidewalks and no public transportation services The addition of pedestrian traffic on these roads without sidewalks is a deadly problem Regarding the proposed Comprehensive Plan, Valeri Heights presents challenges to the Citys vision in the following ways: 1. Traffic Issues. "Meridian's major transportation challenge will be to plan for and accommodate the area's rapid growth in a way that will minimize traffic congestion." (page 63, preliminary draft) "Poorly planned growth may lead to worsening traffic problems...." (page 63) "Large development proposals that are likely to generate significant traffic should be assessed for their impact on the transportation system and surrounding land uses." (page 63) Because decisions have been made too quickly and made with inaccurate and outdated information, this Project at this particular intersection is a traffic nightmare. 3 2. Land Use Planning "The future land use map reflects concentrated urban development in a central area between I-84 and Fairview Avenue and Linder Road and the eastern Impact Area boundary." (page 85) From Action Items: - "Designate Old Town as a priority high-density area." - "Promote and strengthen residential development in and around downtown." This project is well outside of the priority area. - "Designate specific areas with adequate public services for high-density residential." - "Encourage the development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping centers." - "High-density housing must be strategically located to public transportation, community services, and not negatively affect property values." - "Permit new residential, commercial, or industrial developments gDly where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval." This Project is an island without sidewalks connecting it to anywhere. Residents will not be able to safety walk to schools or Albertsons without creating traffic problems. Ten Mile Road is not scheduled to be improved until 2005. There are no employers near this development; residents will have to drive their cars to work, again creating more traffic . In conclusion, The Valera Heights Project is proposed to be developed on Property which is envisioned by citizens and planners to be Medium Density Residential. Valeri Heights violates many of the City of Meridian's planning goals and objectives in the proposed Comprehensive Plan. We respectfully request that Meridian Planning and Zoning Commissioners deny approval based on the extremely serious traffic concerns that this proposed development presents. Respectful!y submitted, David and Irma Atkinson 1124 N. Lightning Place Meridian, ID 83642 (208) 884-3739 enclosures Sent By: Schroeder Enterprises, Inc.; 208 922 4320; Apr -11-00 5:31PM; Page 1/2 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION FROM THE DESK OF... MARGIE SCHROEDER TO: Shelby FAX NO.: 8884218 DATE: April 11, 2000 E kC% E IVED APR 112009 VOY Clerk Off ce COMMENT: Please see that the proper people get this tetter regarding the Planning & Zoning Meeting this evening on the Valeri Heights Proposed Development. Thant: you for your help. PAGES FOLLOWING one If you do not receive all page, of this fax, please contact Margie Schroeder at 8614422 (cell) or 377-2310, ext. 294 (wk.). APR 11 '00 17:15 208 922 4320 PAr,F ni • Page 2 April 5, 2000 11 - We are proposing 304 parking spaces fvr the apartments, 298 are required to meet this requirement. In addition, the parking for the office building, which exceeds the minimum required by City Ordinance can be used for overflow visitor parking in the evenings and on weekends. 12. One of the parking garage areas will serve as a maintenance building. CONDffTONAi, USE — Site Specific Comments: 1. We concur with the recommended restrictions on monument sign sizes. 2. We will screen all trash enclosures. We have been in contact with Sanitary Services Company regarding their standards and have agreed to add several trash areas to meet their requirements. Their approval will be obtained prior to building permit submittal. 3. Handicap parking and accessibility - we will meet this requirement. 4. We intend to record the plat prior to application for any building permit. 5. We will add this landscape area. The parking requirements will still be met with the loss o f one .,pace for this purpose. PRELIMINARY PIAT — General Requirements: 1. A copy of the Street Name Committee report is attached. The final plat will reflect these street names. 2. Eire hydrant location - we will meet this requirement. 3. Agreed 4. This letter is in response to comments. PRELIMINARY PLAT -- Site Specific Reguiremcnts: I . Sanitary Sewer - we will meet this requirement. 2. Water Service - we will meet this requirement. We will submit required fire flow and domestic service requirements prior to review by the Meridian City Council. 3. N/A 4. Lighting - we will meet this requirement. 5. Pressurized irrigation will be provided from surface water currently available at the northeast corner of the site. If the city water is required as a secondary source (instead of the existing well) we agree to pay the required assessments. 6. Easements for the Sub Drain and the Eight mile lateral are delineated on the preliminary plat. 7. Detail Landscape Plans - we will meet this requirement. 8. We will fence the north and east boundaries with 6' high permanent, sight obstructing; fencing. If'you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to contact me at 870-IO13 S, cc - David A. Bailey, P.E. cc: File #C9913 Vicki Welker 600'8 HZb :90 00/90/t o 860SZ968OZ Ranee p i pea DAVID A BAILEY CONSULTING CML ENGNMMG PLANNING (1NVIESIYG noNS TO: Brad Hawkins -Clark City of Meridian 200 B. Carlton, Suite 201 Meridian, ID 83642 DATE: 5 April, 2000 RE: Valeri Heights Planned Development Dear Brad: ]RFCErVE]0 David A. Bailey APR 0 6 2000 6417 Santa Cruz Dr. CITY OF MERIDIAN Boise, Idaho 83709-68.111ANNLNG & ZONING (208)362-6253 (lox) 870-1013 RECEIVE( APR 0 6 2000 City of Meridian City Clerk Office We appreciate your staff report recommending approval of the above project dated 9 March, 2000 and would like to respond to that report as required prior to the Planning and Zoning hearing. The following comments refer to that report: ANNEXATION AND 70NiNG: 1. Agreed 2. If possible, the existing well will be used for landscape irrigation. If not, it will be abandoned in accordance with I•Iealth Department regulations. 3. All ditches crossing the site will be tiled as required and as approved by NMID 4. We will complete the development agreement with the City as required COND>('> IONAIL USE GENERAL COMMENTS: a.,c. We are requesting frontage requirement variances for the townhouse lots but are not requesting any other front, street or side yard setback variances. b. We are proposing 5' wide sidewalks throughout the development and as such are not requesting a variance to the width requirements. 1. OfTstreet parking; is as proposed in the preliminary plat/site plan submitted with the application. We believe this meets the requirements of 11-2-414. 2. Paving and Striping - we will meet this requirement. 3. Drainage plan - we will meet this requirement. 4. Lighting; - we will meet this requirement. 5. Signage — we will meet this requirement. 6. All sidewalks proposed are 5' in width. 7. Accessibility — we will meet these requirements. 8. Trash enclosures will be screened on all sides. 9. The open space within the apartment area and the club house and pool area comprise over 2 acres for a total of l 6% of the site. 10. We are requesting a waiver of this requirement due to the proximity of the Mini — Storage on Ten Mile road and the provision of extra parking spaces above the minimum required, most of which are garage spaces which could accommodate recreational equipment out of sight. Z00'8 HZt':90 00/90/ti0 esosZ9E80Z najiee pinea March 30, 2000 Dave Bivens, Vice -President Ada County Highway District Commissioners 318 East 37`" Street Garden City, ID 83714-6499 Dear Mr. Bivens, The purpose of this letter is to identify areas of traffic and safety concern regarding regarding the Valeri Heights Project at Ten Mile Road and Pine Street in Meridian. As you know, the Commission approved the Preliminary Plat on March 8, 2000. However, we would like to ask that the Commission reconsider their approval based on the following information discovered as we researched this project: 1. When the Commission reviewed this project in September 1999, information provided by ACHD staff included traffic counts done on 8-26-97 (Ten Mile south of Cherry Lane) and on 8-28-97 (Pine east of Ten Mile Road). These counts were, respectively, 6,072 and 1,838. This problematic intersection is less than a mile from Meridian High School; however, school was not in session when this traffic count was done. The school year began that year on 9-2-97. The ACHD traffic count from 1997 does not adeauat ly reflect the traffic on these roads. 2. When the Commission reviewed this project in September, a traffic study paid for by the developer and conducted by Patrick Dobie was provided as well. However, Mr. Dobie did his traffic count on 8-6-99 and, once again, the high school was not in session! His traffic count does not adeauately reflect the traffic on these fgadL 3. When the Commission reviewed the Valeri Heights Project this month, only the information from the September meeting was presented. However, a new traffic count by ACHD had been done on 11-23-99 on Ten Mile north of Pine. This traffic count of 8,551 is alarmingly higher than previous counts, but it was not presented to the Commission to assist in your decision-making. Although a traffic count on Pine east of Ten Mile has not been re -done, the traffic count on Pine west of Linder is comparable; that count on 1-6-2000 was 4,698. 4. Mr. Dobie, in his traffic study update, cites COMPASS projections that traffic on Ten Mile north of Pine will reach 8,500 by Year 2005. It is very concerning to us that this level of traffic was exceeded on 11-23-99 yet there are no plans to make improvements such as widening the road, adding curbs and gutters, putting in sidewalks, nor adding a 4 -way stop or a traffic signal until Year 2005. Page 2 We do not believe that the Commission was able to make an informed decision regarding Valeri Heights because the traffic counts in both traffic studies were done when the high school was not in session. Likewise, the Commission was not provided with the updated traffic count done on 11-23-99 which indicates a dramatic increase in traffic at this inadequate intersection. In addition to these traffic counts which underestimate the impact of the Meridian High School students, there are other concerns about this intersection. Although the paved part of Pine ends at Ten Mile, Pine continues on west of Ten Mile as an unpaved private road which is used by eight families. The traffic studies have not addressed the difficulties of the private road and its impact on those traveling on Ten Mile and Pine. Those of us living near this intersection deal daily with traffic which is backed up for a half mile on Pine as we wait for people to tum left onto Ten Mile. Likewise, we sit southbound on Ten Mile and wait for people to turn left onto Pine. Traffic back-ups are an all -day occurrence as before -school, lunch-hour, and after-school student traffic clogs the streets. This intersection is also a turning point for bus routes coming and going from Meridian Middle School and Meridian High School. The intersection of Ten Mile and Pine is near Chaparral Elementary School which has its own before- and after-school car traffic. Although children living east of Ten Mile are bused to Chaparral because there are no sidewalks and it is a "safe busing zone," it is a daily occurrence that children dart across Ten Mile on foot and on their bicycles. Buses transporting children to and from Chaparral and Meridian Elementary Schools turn at the intersection. The idea of adding Valeri Heights (with 128 apartments, 8 townhouses, and a 2600 square foot commercial development) to this extremely inadequate intersection is alarming to us. We do not believe that he Commissioners were provided with the information they needed to make informed decisions regardinghis roposed development. We respectfully request that your approval of Valeri Heights be at least temporarily rescinded until counts which accurately reflect the level of traffic at this intersection can be done and written into updated traffic studies with which informed decisions can be made. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter of safety in our community. Sincerely, Irma and David Atkinson 1124 N. Lightning Place Meridian, ID 83642 (208) 884-3739 .,uuy reavey-Derr, rresiaem 318 East 37th Street Dave Bivens, Vice President Garden City, Idaho 83714-6499 Marlyss Meyer, Secretary Phone (208) 387-6100 Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Fax (208) 387-6391 Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner E-mail: tell usaachd.ada. id. us April 3, 2000 . — 1 ` �, E ki Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission APR 10 2000 33 E. Idaho Street Meridian, ID 83642 City of hian City Clerrkk Office Subject: Traffic Volumes, Valeri Heights MPP00-005/MAZ00-006/MClJ00-014 Dear Commissioners, It has come to ACHD's attention that the traffic volumes shown on page 2 of the application report for the subject development are outdated. ACHD feels the following information should be considered in your deliberations of the subject development. The most recent count ACHD has on Ten Mile Road at Pine Street is 8,555 vpd. This count was done on 11/23/99 and reflects a 41% increase in traffic over the 8/26/97 count. We did not count traffic volume on Pine Street during this same period but it is likely that a similar increase has occurred there as well. I would estimate the traffic on Pine Street to be about 2600 vpd. The capacity of Ten Mile Road is approximately 14,500 vpd and the capacity of Pine Street is about 8500 vpd. ACHD has not done an investigation of the Ten Mile/Pine intersection but these volume numbers indicate it may be time to install turn lanes, an all -way stop, or both. Please call me at 387-6140 if you have any questions. .rvc FAUOU1 nui iu, r -.F--. Traffic Engineering Supervisor cc: Dave Bivens, ACHD Commissioner J. Schweitzer, Director Larry Sale P&D Supervisor Laura Wilder Irma Atkinson File: Ten Mile/Pine Valeri Heights Volumes.doc E� CotimlNiqhwa��jtPict!140 Y ""''' '�Q"'"'� 318 East 37th Street Dave Bivens, Vice President Garden City, Idaho 83714-6499 Marlyss Meyer, Secretary Phone (208) 387-6100 Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Fax (208) 387-6391 Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner E-mail: tell us(cDachd.ada.id. us April 3, 2000 Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission 33 E. Idaho Street Meridian, ID 83642 Subject: Traffic Volumes, Valeri Heights MPP00-005/MAZ00-006/MC000-014 Dear Commissioners It has come to ACHD's attention that the traffic volumes shown on page 2 of the application report for the subject development are outdated. ACHD feels the following information should be considered in your deliberations of the subject development. The most recent count ACHD has on Ten Mile Road at Pine Street is 8,555 vpd. This count was done on 11/23/99 and reflects a 41% increase in traffic over the 8/26/97 count. We did not count traffic volume on Pine Street during this same period but it is likely that a similar increase has occurred there as well. I would estimate the traffic on Pine Street to be about 2600 vpd. The capacity of Ten Mile Road is approximately 14,500 vpd and the capacity of Pine Street is about 8500 vpd. ACHD has not done an investigation of the Ten Mile/Pine intersection but these volume numbers indicate it may be time to install turn lanes, an all -way stop, or both. Please call me at 387-6140 if you have any questions qua rwaci nui w, r -.r-. Traffic Engineering Supervisor cc: Dave Bivens, ACHD Commissioner J. Schweitzer, Director Larry Sale P&D Supervisor Laura Wilder Irma Atkinson File: Ten Mile/Pine Valeri Heights Volumes.doc ,=AcleC County --_Wiq4waq c It irk, P n D ;A __'_1 '' ' ' ' 318 East 37th Street Dave Bivens, Vice President Garden City, Idaho 83714-6499 Marlyss Meyer, Secretary Phone (208) 387-6100 Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Fax (208) 387-6391 Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner E-mail: tellusCa�achd.ada.id.us April 3, 2000 RECEIVED Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission APR 0 6 2000 33 E. Idaho Street Meridian, ID 83642 City of Meridian City Clerk Office Subject: Traffic Volumes, Valeri Heights MPP00-005/MAZ00-006/MC000-014 Dear Commissioners, It has come to ACHD's attention that the traffic volumes shown on page 2 of the application report for the subject development are outdated. ACHD feels the following information should be considered in your deliberations of the subject development. The most recent count ACHD has on Ten Mile Road at Pine Street is 8,555 vpd. This count was done on 11/23/99 and reflects a 41 % increase in traffic over the 8/26/97 count. We did not count traffic volume on Pine Street during this same period but it is likely that a similar increase has occurred there as well. I would estimate the traffic on Pine Street to be about 2600 vpd. The capacity of Ten Mile Road is approximately 14,500 vpd and the capacity of Pine Street is about 8500 vpd. ACHD has not done an investigation of the Ten Mile/Pine intersection but these volume numbers indicate it may be time to install turn lanes, an all -way stop, or both. Please call me at 387-6140 if you have any questions. JVc f1VJCl IIUIIU, r.C. Traffic Engineering Supervisor cc: Dave Bivens, ACHD Commissioner J. Schweitzer, Director Larry Sale P&D Supervisor Laura Wilder Irma Atkinson File: Ten Mile/Pine Valeri Heights Volumes.doc ** TX CONFIRr BION REPORT ** DATE TIME TO/FROM 03/17 08:34 92083776449 AS OF MAR 17 h 08.36 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD# STATUS EC --S 01'14" 005 254 OK � ----------------------------------------- NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho at the hour of 7:00 p.m. on April 11, 2000 for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of Joseph D. Heilker for a conditional use permit for a vacant lot for proposed 10,000 square foot lease building. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 16th day of March, 2000. PUBLISH March 24, & April 7 2000. Post -it* Fax Note 7671 Date 3 aas�� To /f .J r 1. From cadDept if.Qa-j Co. Phone# V Phone# 8 33 Fax # Fax B LLIAM G. BERG, JR., LERK 0%11114 111(1111// OF SEAL �O` �T 1s� • P,z• �, e�UiV'rY � UJ/ 2S/UU 1Hu 15:zo kAA LUd 666 tflUO ffil!RIDIAN 6(,huuL vibil-uG1 1997-x1998 —AUgUSt 1997-71 I S M T W T F S 1 —September 1997 S M T W T F S i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -11 18 19 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 —September 1997 S M T W T F S 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 21 October 1997 S M T W T F S 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 14 November 1997 S M T W T F S 21 22 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3o 1 2 —December 1997 S M T W T F S 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 $0 F— January 1998 S M T W T F S AUGUST 22&ZS 26-28 29 SEPTEMBER 1 2 2 3 OCTOBER 2-3 31 NOVEMBER 5 6-7 26 27-28 DECEMBER 19 22 -Jan. 2 JANUARY 5 15-16 16 FEBRUARY 16 MARCH 20 23-27 APRIL 3 MAY 29 Ji 4 5 New Teachers Report All Teachers Report Fall In -Service Labor Day Holiday Fhst Day of School -Half Day Grades 1-12 Kindergarten -No School Parent/Teacher Conferences Kindergarten -First Day of School State In -Service No School Grades K-12 Building In -Service -End of Quarter No School Grades K-8 Kindergarten -No School Parent/Teacher Conferences No School Grades K-12 Parent/Teacher Conferences Early Release Grades K-12 Thanksgiving Vacation Early Release Grades K-12 Christmas Vacation School Resumes -Grades K-12 Early Release Grades 9-12 Testing/Building In -Service No School Grades K-8 Building In -Service -End of Quarter No School Grades K-12 District In -Service Early Release Grades K-12 End of Quarter Spring Break -No School No School -Grades K-12 Pamat/Teacher Conferences Memorial Day Holiday Early Release Grades 9-12 Testing/Building In -Service Last Day of School burly Release Grades K-12 End of Quarter Grading Periods Sept_ 2- Oct. 31.»....44 days Nov. 3 -Jan. 16. ...... 43 days Jan. 19 -March 20.»45 days March 30 .Tune 5.....A8 days Approved 12-9-96 wl 00 1 February 1998 S M T W 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 AUGUST 22&ZS 26-28 29 SEPTEMBER 1 2 2 3 OCTOBER 2-3 31 NOVEMBER 5 6-7 26 27-28 DECEMBER 19 22 -Jan. 2 JANUARY 5 15-16 16 FEBRUARY 16 MARCH 20 23-27 APRIL 3 MAY 29 Ji 4 5 New Teachers Report All Teachers Report Fall In -Service Labor Day Holiday Fhst Day of School -Half Day Grades 1-12 Kindergarten -No School Parent/Teacher Conferences Kindergarten -First Day of School State In -Service No School Grades K-12 Building In -Service -End of Quarter No School Grades K-8 Kindergarten -No School Parent/Teacher Conferences No School Grades K-12 Parent/Teacher Conferences Early Release Grades K-12 Thanksgiving Vacation Early Release Grades K-12 Christmas Vacation School Resumes -Grades K-12 Early Release Grades 9-12 Testing/Building In -Service No School Grades K-8 Building In -Service -End of Quarter No School Grades K-12 District In -Service Early Release Grades K-12 End of Quarter Spring Break -No School No School -Grades K-12 Pamat/Teacher Conferences Memorial Day Holiday Early Release Grades 9-12 Testing/Building In -Service Last Day of School burly Release Grades K-12 End of Quarter Grading Periods Sept_ 2- Oct. 31.»....44 days Nov. 3 -Jan. 16. ...... 43 days Jan. 19 -March 20.»45 days March 30 .Tune 5.....A8 days Approved 12-9-96 wl 00 1 February 1998 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 March 1999—, S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 -April 1998 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 29 $0 May 1998 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 June 1998 S__.M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 July 1998 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 10/16/1996 L3O st 1999 W T F S 4 5 6 7 11 12 13 14 18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 - September 1999— .S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 October 1999 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 November 1999 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 December 1999 S M T W T FS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 January 2000 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1999-2000 AUC.= L4T 23 25 30 31 31 SEPTEMBER 1 6 OCTOBER 7&8 ►1 / u: 10 11-12 24 25-26 17 204an. 2 JANUARY V 3 17 20-21 21 18 21 MARCH 24 27-31 APRIL 7 MAY 29 .IIJ�iE 6 7 New Teachers Report All Teachers Report Fall Inservice First Day of School -Early Release Grades 1-12 Kindergarten Orientation Kindergarten -First Day of School Labor Day Holiday State Inservice No School Grades K-12 Building Inservice-End of Quarter No School Grades K-8 No School Kindergarten Parent/Teacher Conferences No School Grades K-12 Parent/Teacher Conferences Early Release Grades K-12 Thanksgiving Vacation Early, Release Grades K-12 Christmas Vacation School Resumes No School Grades K-12 - Civil Rights Day Early Release Grades 9-12 Testing/Building Inservice No School Grades K-8 Building Inservice-End of Semester No School Grades K-12 District Inservice No School Grades K-12 Presidents' Day Early Release Grades K-12 End of Third Quarter Spring Break No School Grades K-12 Parent/Teacher Conferences Memorial Day Holiday Early Release Grades 9-12 TestingBuilding Inservice Last Day of School/Early Release Grades K-12 - End of Quarter First Quarter - 47 days Second Quarter - 42 days Third Quarter - 44 days Fourth Quarter - 47 days July 2000 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 11/30/1998 February 2000 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 March 2000 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 April 2000 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 May 2000 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 July 2000 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 11/30/1998 March 10, 2000 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING: March 14, 2000 APPLICANT: VICKI WELKER ITEM NUMBER: 9 REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONING FOR 12.73 ACRES FOR PROPOSED VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION AGENC COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING & ZONING DEPT. SEE STAFF COMMENTS CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WASTEWATER DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: SANITARY SERVICE: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. HP LaserJet 3100 Printer/Fax/Copier/Scanner oEND CONFIRMATION REPORT for City of Meridian 2088886854 Mar -14-00 9:43AM Job Start Time Usage Phone Number or ID Type Pages Mode Status 472 3/14 9:43AM 0'26" 208 884 4259 Send .............. 1/ 1 EC144 Completed.................... Total 0126" Pages Sent: 1 Pages Printed: 0 March 9, 2000 Meridian City Hall 200 E. Carlton Ave. Meridian ID. 83642 Planning and zoning In regards to the proposed Valerie Heights Apartments. We do not think this is the right place to put apartments. Pine and Ten mile already have a lot of traffic. We get a lot of cut thru traffic from the high school as it is now. Then to add so much more will be a real mess. We had no idea this was proposed when we bought this house. We along with the rest of our neighbors thought it was going to be all single-family houses. Most of us feel very strongly that this kind of development is not compatible with the surrounding area. Please do not let this type of development go in at this spot. We will plan to attend the public hearing on March 14 to strongly oppose the Valerie heights apartments. Thank you for taking the time to hear our concerns. Sincerely Steve and Debbie Shurte 2814 w. Forecast st. Meridian ID. 83642 K�� cla --,14 cottid tUct Wricl - 11 1 ic, Judy Peavey -Derr, President JK Dave Bivens. Vice President 318 East 37th Street Marlyss Meyer, Secretary Garden City. Idaho 8371.1-6.199 Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Phone (208) 387-6100 Susan S. Eastlake. Commissioner Fax (2108) 387-6391 E-mail: tellusrwachd.ada.id.us March 13. 2000 E-7c_ � , -`� ,Lf TO: Vicki Welker Gold River Companies 1311 E. Franklin Rd., Suite 102 Meridian, ID 83642 FROM: Steve Arnold, Principal Development Am Planning & Development SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat: VALERI HEIGHTS TEN MILE ROAD/PINE STREET MAR i 5 2000 Y ,ii=L12 On March 8, 2000, the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District (hereafter called "District") took action on the preliminary Plat as stated on the attached staff report. In order that the Final Plat may be considered by the District for acceptance, the Developer shall cause the following applicable standard conditions to be satisfied prior to District certification and endorsement: 1. Drainage plans shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. 2. If public street improvements are required: Prior to any construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way, the following shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. a. Three complete sets of detailed street construction drawings prepared by an Idaho registered professional Engineer. b. Execute and Inspection Agreement between the Developer and the District together ,vith initial payment deposit for inspection and/or testinr, cervices. C. Complete all greet improvements to the satisfaction of the District, cr execute a Suret,/ Agreement bet%-/een the Developer and the District to guarantee the c:r-mPleticn cf t"e n of all r, .:ir s'. r ... �L,l.,tr.1.,.IC�� rc. i �; snot improvements. Furnish a copy of the , :��I Plat sho..inc stn:�el rarliec as approved c, U,e Lcc<iI Government Agenc,v having such authcrit,; G�c�ether with the pa,rnient of fee charged for the manufacturing and installation of all street signs. .-. 4. If Public Right -of -Nay Trust Fund deposit is required, make the deposit to the District in the form of cash cr cashier's check for the amcunt specified by the District. 5. Furnish easements, agreements and all other datum or documents as required by the District. 6. Furnish Final Plat drawings together with the plat and plan review fees for District acceptance and endorsement. The final plat must contain the signed endorsement of the Owner and the Land Surveyor's certification. 7. All of the material must be submitted to District staff two -weeks prior to Commission review of the final plat. 8. Approval of the plat is valid for one year. The Commission will consider an extension of one year if requested within 15 -days prior to the expiration date. Please contact me at (208) 387-6170, should you have any questions. Cc: Planning & Development Chron/File Planning & Development Services -CITY OF MERIDIAN Construction Services — John Edney Drainage- Chuck Rinaldi David and Shirley Fuller 890 N. Ten Mile Rd. Meridian, ID 83642 David R. Bailey, P.E. David A. Bailey Consulting 6417 Santa Cruz Dr. Boise. 1D 83709 ADP, COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT Planning and Development Division Development .-application Report �[ODIF'IED Preliminary Plat - Valeri Heightsl_,IPPS}0_005 N1AZ00-006/,vY[CUP00-01=t Ten ,dile Road, Pine Street Valeri Heights is a 10 -lot residential commercial subdivision Oil 12.7 acres. The applicant is also requestin` conditional use approval to construct a fftI2S-unit apartment complex, and a 26,000 -square toot Office, Commercial complex, «�ith a rezone from RT to R -I 5 and LO. The site is located at the northeast corner of Ten mile Road and Pine Street. This dek eiopment is estimated to `enerate 1,320 additional l 10 existinv,) vehicle trips per day trafficbased on the submitted study. On September S, I999, the Commission reviewed and approved Valeri Hei;hts. The previousiti approved site was estimated to ;enerate 1,-100 vehi tcle trips per day. The applicant has chanted he site plan eliminating the driveway on Ten Vfile Road. The following report addresses the change to the site plan. Roads impacted by this development: Ten Mile Road Pine Street Lightning Way Gray Cloud Way ACHD Commission Date — iNfarch S, 2000 - 7:00 p.m. W z of _ �z t c� S HP LaserJet 3100 Printer/Fax/Copier/Scanner Facts and Findings: A. Generallnforniation SEND CONFIRMATION REPORT for City of Meridian 2088886854 Mnr_in_nn 11 •AAAAA Owner - David & Shirley Fuller Applicant - Bob Unger, Pinnacle En`ineers RT - Existing zonin`, R-15/10 - Requested zoning 12.73 -Acres 10 - Proposed lots (8 townhouse lots, 1 commercial lot, 1 apartment lot with 128 units) 164 - Proposed dwelling twits 26.000 - Square feet of proposed commercial,'office building 272 - Traffic Analysis Zone JAZ) Gest Ada - Impact Fee Service Area Western Cities - Impact Fee Assessment District Ten Mile Road Minor Arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 6,072 on 8-26-97 (s/o Cherry Lane) $tC551 Va3/g� AC. b 680 -feet of frontage 58 -feet existing right-of-way (33 -feet east of centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Ten Mile Road is improved with 30 -feet of pavement without curb, nutter or sidewalk abutting the site. Pine Street Collector with bike lane designation Traffic count of 1,538 on 8-28-97 (e/o Ten Mile Road) S30 -feet of frontage 50 -feet existing right-of-wav (25 -feet from centerline) 70 -feet required right-of-way (35 -feet from centerline) /Vz000 4,1en P we- w• of UrJ,, r per Act1D ' -A%A-t Pine Street is improved with 23 -feet of pavement with no curb, nutter or sidewalk. Lightning Wav Local street with no bike lane designation No traffic count available 0 -feet of frontage No additional right-ot=wav required UgflitrinuWay is improved with a 37 -foot street section k\ ith curl). `_utter and sidewalk. MEMORANDUM: March 9, 2000 To: Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor and City Council,'CS=T v From: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer MAR 1 0 ?000 Brad Hawkins -Clark' Planner /�C, City of Meridian =''itv Clerk Office Re: VALERI HEIGHTS by GOLD RIVER COMPANIES, INC. • Annexation & Zoning of 13.83 Acres from R -T to R-15 & LO (AZ -00-006) • Conditional Use Permit for 128 -Unit Apartment Complex, 8 Townhouse, and a 26,000 Square Foot Limited Office Complex (CUP -00-014) • Preliminary Plat for Multi -Family and Townhouse Residential & Limited Office (PP - 00 -005) We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATIONS SUMMARY d in this report. The Annexation &Zoning application proposes Three separate applications are covere to annex two existing parcels (both currently zoned RT in Ada County) and rezone 2.87 acres in the southwest corner to Limited Office (L -O) and the remainder of the site (10.96 acres) to R-15. The CUP application proposes a 128 -unit apartment complex and 8 townhouses in the R-15 area and a single, 26,000 office building in the L -O area. The Preliminary Plat application proposes to subdivide the property into three (3) blocks, two of which comprise the eight townhouse lots only and the third is the apartments and office building. Both existing parcels are owned by David and Shirley Fuller and the project was submitted by Gold River Companies, Inc. as a Planned Unit Development. Compared to the previous application for this property which was denied by the City, this plan has reduced the number of apartments by 30 units (158 to 128), increased the number of townhouses from 6 to 8 and increased the office building from 18,000 s.f. to 26,000 s.f. We agree with the Applicant that the new plan has accommodated many of the Commission and Council's previous reasons for denial, most notably the elimination of tandem parking, increased open space and improved building layout. LOCATION The subject parcels are located at the northeast corner of W. Pine Street and S. Ten Mile Road. The property is located in an area designated as Mixed Residential in the Comprehensive Plan. A sub drain of Ten Mile Creek courses the extreme SWC of property. There is an existing house with two valeri Heights PD.AZ.CUP.PP.doc AZ -00-006 CUP -00-014 PP -00-005 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR LEGAL DEPARTMENT Robert D. Come A Good Place to Live (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS BUILDING DEPARTMENT Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Keith Bird (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Tamm deWeerd Tammy City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT Cherie McCandless (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 MEMORANDUM: March 9, 2000 To: Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor and City Council,'CS=T v From: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer MAR 1 0 ?000 Brad Hawkins -Clark' Planner /�C, City of Meridian =''itv Clerk Office Re: VALERI HEIGHTS by GOLD RIVER COMPANIES, INC. • Annexation & Zoning of 13.83 Acres from R -T to R-15 & LO (AZ -00-006) • Conditional Use Permit for 128 -Unit Apartment Complex, 8 Townhouse, and a 26,000 Square Foot Limited Office Complex (CUP -00-014) • Preliminary Plat for Multi -Family and Townhouse Residential & Limited Office (PP - 00 -005) We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATIONS SUMMARY d in this report. The Annexation &Zoning application proposes Three separate applications are covere to annex two existing parcels (both currently zoned RT in Ada County) and rezone 2.87 acres in the southwest corner to Limited Office (L -O) and the remainder of the site (10.96 acres) to R-15. The CUP application proposes a 128 -unit apartment complex and 8 townhouses in the R-15 area and a single, 26,000 office building in the L -O area. The Preliminary Plat application proposes to subdivide the property into three (3) blocks, two of which comprise the eight townhouse lots only and the third is the apartments and office building. Both existing parcels are owned by David and Shirley Fuller and the project was submitted by Gold River Companies, Inc. as a Planned Unit Development. Compared to the previous application for this property which was denied by the City, this plan has reduced the number of apartments by 30 units (158 to 128), increased the number of townhouses from 6 to 8 and increased the office building from 18,000 s.f. to 26,000 s.f. We agree with the Applicant that the new plan has accommodated many of the Commission and Council's previous reasons for denial, most notably the elimination of tandem parking, increased open space and improved building layout. LOCATION The subject parcels are located at the northeast corner of W. Pine Street and S. Ten Mile Road. The property is located in an area designated as Mixed Residential in the Comprehensive Plan. A sub drain of Ten Mile Creek courses the extreme SWC of property. There is an existing house with two valeri Heights PD.AZ.CUP.PP.doc AZ -00-006 CUP -00-014 PP -00-005 r Mayor, Council and P&Z March 9, 2000 Page 2 agricultural outbuildings currently on the west parcel. The east parcel is vacant. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North — Thunder Creek Subdivision (20 single-family homes platted in 1998). Zoned R-4 (Meridian). Four homes abut the north property lines of the proposed site. South — Immediately across W. Pine are several County parcels with single family homes zoned RT. The U.P.R.R. spur lies approximately 950 feet south on Ten Mile Road. The recently constructed Access Mini Storage complex is just south of the railroad tracks on the west side of Ten Mile. East — A private road, Can -Dee Lane, is adjacent to the east boundary. A single family home is situated on the east end of the parcel. West — Single family home on a 5.6 acre parcel zoned RT in Ada County. ANNEXATION & ZONING 1. The legal descriptions submitted for annexation (one each for the requested L -O and R-15 zones) appear to meet the requirements of the Idaho State Tax Commission and the City of Meridian. Approved copies of the legal descriptions have been sent to the City Attorney's Office for their use in the preparation of an ordinance. 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517. Wells may be used for non- domestic ondomestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project, shall be tiled per City Ordinance 11-9-605.M. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. 4. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City as a condition of annexation. The Development Agreement should address, among other things, specific landscape/common area requirements, any height limitations, right-of-way dedication prior to submitting for building permits, signage, bike lanes, etc. Through a development agreement, restrictions could also be placed on the use of the proposed L -O property to prevent future application for a convenience store or other strictly commercial uses that are allowed in the L -O zone with a conditional use. Staff recommends the CU -permitted Bars/Alcoholic Establishments in the L -O be prohibited for this property in the D.A. VBleri Heights PD.AZ.CUP.PP.doc AZ -00-006 CUP -00-014 PP -00-005 50 Mayor, Council and P&Z March 9, 2000 Page 3 CONDITIONAL USE GENERAL COMMENTS: i"'t As is common in a planned development, exceptions can be made by Council to district regulations when they are desirable to achieve the objectives of the proposed PD. "Ord. Section 12-6-5 MODIFICATION OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS A PD shall be allowed only as a Conditional Use in each district subject to the standards and procedures set forth in this Section. A PD shall be governed by the regulations of the district or districts in which said PD is located. The approval of the Final Development Plan for a PD may provide for such exceptions from the district regulations governing use, density, area, bulk, parking, signs, and other regulations as may be desirable to achieve the objectives of the proposed PD, provided such exceptions are consistent with the standards and criteria contained in this Section." Specific variances/exceptions that would need to be approved to grant this CUP/PD as presented would include: a Frontages for townhouse lots b Provision of 5' sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-9-606.B. c Front, street and side yard setbacks Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 11-2-414 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements. 2. Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Sections 11-2-414.D.4 and 11-2-414.D.5 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 3. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 4. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas or the traveling public in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-2-414.D.3. 5. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-2-415 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance or as specifically approved. No temporary Valed Heights PD.ALCUPYRdoc AZ -00-006 CUP -00-014 PP -00-005 Facts and Findings: A. Generallnforniation Owner - David & Shirley Fuller Applicant - Bob Unger, Pinnacle Engineers RT - Existinly zonintz_> R-15/10 - Requested zoning 12.73 -Acres 10 - Proposed lots (8 townhoilse lots, 1 commercial lot. 1 apartment lot with 128 units) 164 - Proposed dwellin` units 26,000 - Square feet of proposed commercial,'office building 272 - Traffic Analvsis Zone (TAZ) ` West Ada - Impact Fee Service Area Western Cities - Impact Fee Assessment District Ten Mile Road .N11IinorA-aerial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 6,072 on 8-26-97 (s/o Cherry Lane) -c9 551 �1/a3 /qq( � A`�il t> 680 -feet of frontage t / �• 58-feet existing right-of-way (33 -feet east of centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Ten Mile Road is improved with 30 -feet of pavement without curb, gutter or sidewalk abut the site. Pine Street Collector with bike lane designation Traffic count of 1,838 on 8-28-97 (e,'o Ten �(ile Road) 830 -feet of fronta,e 50 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 70 -feet required right-of-way (35 -feet from centerline) 1/(,0(2000 4,hq% PI -e- W. off' Uwdt r pe -y- AcAD S>1ud-i Pine Street is improved with 234eet of pavement with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. L.I,_Jhtniny Way Local street with no bike lane designation No traffic count t1vailable 0 -feet of fronta'e No additional ri-grht-of-wav required Li�zhtnin`, %V'jv is improved with a 3 i -toot street sectlolz 41'lth curb, ,utter and sidewalk. CO K6L A Ob Fajc�s O_Vd PIAIA�s aA Oxe Vtot &4QCeA is !+W5 Cq Mayor, Council and P&Z March 9, 2000 Page 4 signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 6. Provide five-foot wide pedestrian walkways in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-9-606.B. 7. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Fair Housing Act (for residential units). 8. Screened trash enclosures shall be provided in accordance with Ordinance 11-2-413.A.3. 9. Proposals for Planned Unit Developments must include a minimum of ten percent common area. Common open space shall mean land area exclusive of street rights-of-way, buildings, parking areas, structures, and appurtenances except those improvements that are accessible and available to all occupants of the private units within the PD. Required landscape setbacks on Ten Mile Road and Pine Street should not be included in these calculations. 10. Storage areas shall be provided for the anticipated needs of boats, campers and trailers. For typical residential development, one (1) adequate space shall be provided every two (2) living units. This may be reduced by City action if there is a showing that the needs of a particular development are less. Staff recognizes that, due to the close proximity of Access Mini Storage just south on Ten Mile Road, this requirement could be waived. 11. One (1) additional parking space beyond that which is required by the Zoning Ordinance may be required for every three (3) dwelling units to accommodate visitor parking. Parking areas may be no closer than four feet (4') to any established street or alleyway. 12. A maintenance building or approved area shall be provided that is suitable for the services required for the repair and maintenance of all common areas. CONDITIONAL USE — Site Specific Comments: 1. Applicant states that two monument signs will be proposed in the future, one at each entrance to the site. Staff recommends a maximum background area of 32 s.£ and a maximum height of 6 feet be placed on these signs. 2. Screen trash areas on all sides. Coordinate screened trash enclosure locations and construction requirements with Sanitary Service Company and provide a letter of approval from their office prior to applying for building permits. Valeri Heights PD.AZ.CUP.PP.doc AZ -00.006 CUP -00-014 PP -00-005 r1*.. Mayor, Council and P&Z March 9, 2000 Page 5 3. Handicap parking, associated signage and building construction shall meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 4. If a building permit is sought prior to platting of property, evidence of dedication of additional right-of-way to ACRD (recorded warranty deeds) will be required prior to application for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. 5. There are a 27 contiguous parking stalls on the east side of the north wing of the office building. A minimum of one (1) landscaped island/bump-out should be added to this row of parking. PRELIMINARY PLAT — General Requirements: L Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 2. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 3. Assessment fees for water and sewer service are determined during the building plan review process. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Re -Assessment Agreement with the City of Meridian for all commercial uses. An assessment agreement is a vehicle that protects the City of Meridian and the Developer in the event that estimated assessments are not in line with actual usages. The agreement provides for reimbursement to the developer for over payment of assessments, and payment to the City of Meridian of any shortfall in assessments. The overpayment/shortfall is determined after adequate historical usage. 4. If possible, respond in writing to each of the comments contained in this memorandum by noon the day of the scheduled hearing by the Meridian Planning and Zoning. Submit ten copies of the revised Preliminary Plat Map to the City Clerk's Office a minimum of one week prior to the hearing by the Meridian City Council. PRELIMINARY PLAT — Site Specific Requirements: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this site will be via extensions from existing mains that were installed adjacent to the proposed development. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline. Valeri Heights PD.AZ.CUP.PP.doc AZ -00-006 CUP -00-014 PP -00-005 n Mayor, Council and P&Z March 9, 2000 Page 6 2. Water service to this site will be via extensions of existing mains installed in adjacent developments. Applicant will be responsible to construct the water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Please provide the Public works department with information on anticipated fire flow and domestic water requirements for the proposed site. Water service to this development is contingent upon positive results from a hydraulic analysis by our computer model. Flow and pressure from the existing mains should be monitored with the Meridian Water Department. 4. Two -hundred -fifty- and 100 -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 5. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on site. Please submit hook-up and design details based on the proposed landscaping. Due to the landscape area, primary water supply connection to the City's mains will not be allowed. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area. 6. Please show all existing easements for irrigation/drainage facilities located within the boundaries of this proposed development. 7. Detailed landscape plans for the common areas, including fencing locations, water fountain area and types of construction, shall be submitted for review and approval with the submittal of the final plat map or prior to applying for building permits, whichever occurs first. A letter of credit or cash surety will be required for the improvements prior to signature on the final plat. 8. Six -foot -high, permanent perimeter fencing shall be provided. Submit detailed plans for approval with submittal of the final plat and/or building permit applications. All required fencing is to be in place prior to applying for building permits. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES The subject property is located in an area designated as Mixed Residential in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. No definition or standards presently exist for this designation. The 1993 Comprehensive Plan contains a variety of goals and policies relevant to this application. The following Valeri Heights PD.ALCUP.PP.doc AZ -00-006 CUP -00-014 PP -00-005 Mayor, Council and P&Z March 9, 2000 Page 7 sections most directly apply to the proposed project and are repeated here for the Council and Commission's consideration during the hearing process. Land Use Chapter I AU — Encourage new development that reinforces the City's present development pattern of higher density development within the Old Town area and lower density development in outlying areas. 1.8U — Promote the development of high-quality and environmentally compatible residential areas that contain the necessary parks, schools and commercial facilities to maintain and form identifiable neighborhoods. 2. 1 — Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi -family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities. 2.2U — Support strategies for the development of neighborhood parks within all residential areas. 2.3U — Protect and maintain residential neighborhood property values, improve each neighborhood's physical condition and enhance its quality of life for residents. 2.5U — Encourage compatible infill development that will improve existing neighborhoods. 6.8U — New urban density subdivisions which abut or are proximal to existing rural residential land uses shall provide screening and transitional densities with larger, more comparable lot sizes to buffer the interface between the urban level densities and rural residential densities. Natural Resources and Hazardous Areas 1.1U — Identify and protect areas with special characteristics such as stream corridors, canals, and wetlands. 2.1U — Development along major drainage ways will be restricted to ensure that development does not cause additional ground or surface water contamination. 3.lU — Manage and prevent unsuitable uses along drainageways and protect the flood plains of creeks and drains. Transportation I AU — Monitor and coordinate the compatibility of the land use and transportation system. 1.20U — Encourage proper design of residential neighborhoods to ensure their safety and tranquility. 2.9U — Designate Pine Street, from Eagle to Ten Mile, as Minor Arterial (proposed extension). Valeri Heights PD.AZ.CUP.PP.&c AZ -00-006 CUP -00-014 PP -00-005 r Mayor, Council and P&Z March 9, 2000 Page 8 4.2 - Pine Street and Ten Mile are designated as bike lanes. Open Space Parks and Recreation 2.5U — New subdivision development... will be considered as opportunities to ... Encourage the development of recreational open spaces and parks as part of new planned developments. Housing 1.1 - ...provide for a wide diversity of housing types ... in a variety of locations suitable for residential development. 1.4 — The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping centers shall be encouraged. 1.6 — Housing proposals shall be phased with transportation, open space and public service and facility plans, which will maximize benefits to the residents, minimize conflicts and provide a tie-in between new residential areas and service needs. 1.19 — High-density development, where possible, should be located near open space corridors or other permanent major open space and park facilities, and near major access thoroughfares. Community Design Chapter 5.2 — Ensure that all new development enhances rather than detracts from the visual quality of its surroundings, especially in areas of prominent visibility. 6.5U — Establish land -use designations that reflect the character of existing neighborhoods. 6.11U — Promote well-planned and well -designated affordable housing in all Meridian neighborhoods. RECOMMENDATION The COMPASS staff also reviewed this application for conformity with their long-range and alternative transportation plans. Specifically, they support the application and feel the office use in the project may decrease the total number of VMTs expected. Dobie Engineers (ACHD concurs) estimates the total number of additional vehicle trips to be 1,320 per day. Depending on the type of future services and tenants in the office building, the number of VMTs generated by the site could decrease, assuming some residents may utilize these businesses and reduce their average number of daily trips. COMPASS is also tentatively planning to conduct a feasibility study to convert the UPRR corridor to a busway. While likely several years out, if this corridor is converted to some form of mass transit, Staff feels the higher density development less than 1,000 feet from the corridor is very compatible and would be a good use to compliment transit. Valai Heights PD.AZ.CUPYR&c AZ -00-006 CUP -00-014 PP -00-005 I— Mayor, Council and. P&Z March 9, 2000 Page 9 With the recommended modifications above, Staff recommends approval of the Annexation, Conditional Use and Preliminary Plat applications. Valeri Heights PD.ALCUPYRdoc AZ -00-006 CUP -00-014 PP -00-005 STREET LOCATION / COMMENT CITY D COUNT DIRECTION AM PEAK PM PEAK TECHNOLOGY WAY S/O GOWEN RD BOISE 1,007. 187 • .. APPROACH & TOTAL 5,812 . NB 61 325 SB TEN MILE CREEK RD W/O PLEASANT VALLEY ADA COUNTY432 EB 14 6 ' CLASSIFICATION 5 WB 5 14 ,y TEN MILE RD BETW L HAZEL & AMITY /90 1,647 day N/O AMITY RD 1/94 1,144 APPROACH & TOTAL csday N/0 CHERRY LANE 6/97 5,228 NB ITD COUNT uesday SB N/0 FRANKLIN RD 123/99 7,964 NB ITD COUNT Tuesday SB N/0 HUBBARD RD 2/23/00 2,995 NB 217 84 APPROACH & TOTAL cdncsday SB 144 209 N/O USTICK RD 5/11/99 2,168 NB 156 77 APPROACH & TOTAL Tuesday SB 84 152 S/O COLUMBIA RD f 5/10/94 1,262 " - APPROACH & TOTAL 1 Tuesday t.. S S/O FRANKLIN RD / 1123/99 5,981 NB ITD COUNT Tuesday SB S/O HUBBARD RD 223/00 3,019 NB 213 88 APPROACH & TOTAL Wednesday SB 155 204 S/0 OVERLAND 9/19/95 3,005 NB 131 175 CLASSIFICATION Tuesday SB 231 127 S/0 USTICK RD 5/12/99 2,979 NB 130 123 APPROACH & TOTAL Wednesday SB 95 188 S/0 VICTORY RD 9/30/97 2,322 NB 159 81 VOLUME Tuesday SB 80 152 N/0 AVALON ST KUNA 8/19/99 73 NB ITD COUNT Thursday SB S/0 AVALON 8/19/99 534 NB ITD COUNT Thursday SB N/0 PINE AVE MERIDIAN 11/23/99 8,551 NB ITD COUNT Tuesday SB THATCHER ST E/O 9TH ST BOISE 2/18/99 484 EB 10 14 APPROACH & TOTAL Thursday WB 32 18 THUNDER MOUNTAIN DR E/O CIMARRON AVE ADA COUNTY 4/21/98 289 EB 9 12 APPROACH & TOTAL Tuesday WB 2 15 THUNDERBOLT DR W/O COLE RD BOISE 4/29/96 964 EB 16 61 VOLUME Monday WB 33 37 TODD WY N/O CHERRY LN MERIDIAN 11/16/99 1,690 NB ITD COUNT Tuesday SB TRAILSIDE DR E/O ISLAND WOOD DR EAGLE~ 22/00 121 EB 4 4 APPROACH & TOTAL Wednesday WB 6 3 92 -Mar -00 Counts compiled by ACHD from average daily traffic data collected by ACHD and ITD. 74 Of 80 VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE Page 2 The sum of site generated traffic plus COMPASS projections was evaluated to assess future traffic conditions. In addition to the traditional PM peak hour traffic analysis, a noon hour evaluation was also prepared for this site. At this time, traffic from Meridian High School loads Pine Street. Future trips at full buildout of the Valeri Heights Subdivision were estimated and assigned to the local streets. Shown in Figure 3 are the probable average daily traffic volumes on the project driveways. Figure 4, which follows, illustrates the turning movements at the arterial intersection and the main site entrance for the peak hour periods in the year 2005. Presented in Table 3 are the findings of a level of service analysis for the major project entrances during the PM peak hour for the year 2005. Appendix C contains the detailed calculations. Table 3 LOS Analysis at Project Entrances (Unsignalized Intersection) SB - L EB - L WB - L Pine Avenue/Drive A B A N/A Ten Mile Road/Drive B A N/A C As indicated in Table 3, projected traffic will experience very little delay during the PM peak hour period with the addition of left -turn lanes as proposed. Shown in Table 4 is the LOS analysis of the arterial intersection of Ten Mile Road with Pine Avenue. In this evaluation both the PM peak hour and noon hour conditions for the year 2005 traffic environment were evaluated with full buildout traffic from Valeri Heights. Table 4 Peak Hour LOS Analvsis for the Arterial Intersections Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. PM Hour Noon Hour Approaches: Left Thru/Right Left Thru/Right Eastbound D D B B Westbound F C B A Northbound A A A A Southbound B A B A Intersection LOS D A Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE Page 1 Dobie Engineering, Inc. 777 Hearthstone Dr. Boise, ID 83702 (208)345-3290 Dave Bailey Hubble Engineering, Inc. 9550 Bethel Ct. Boise, ID 83709 RE: Valeri Heights Subdivision Traffic Study Update Dear Dave: This supplemental traffic analysis was prepared to evaluate the impacts of the revised site plan and development program for the Valeri Heights Subdivision. Refer to the original traffic study (DEI, 8/99) for additional information and analysis. The new development program includes 128 apartments units, 8 townhomes and 32,000 sf of general office space. In addition, the new site plan proposes only one driveway accessing Ten Mile Road. Estimated site generated traffic is summarized in Table 1. Table 1 Site -Generated Traffic (Rounded) Subdivision: No. Units New Trips/Day AM Trips PM Trips Apartment Units 136 900 70 85 Office Space 32.0 555 75 115 Total 1455 145 200 Shown in Table 2 are the projected future traffic volumes within the _study area as presented in the current COMPASS Transportation Planning Model. Table 2 Site Traffic Distribution Average Daily Traffic Projections Street: Year 2005 Year 2015 Ten Mile Road North of Pine Avenue 8,500 17,700 Pine Avenue East of Ten Mile Road 7,100 10,700 Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE Page 3 This summary indicates that the intersection operates at an overall level of service "D" rating during the PM peak hour with the addition of the site -generated traffic from Valeri Heights. The noon traffic is less than the PM peak hour volume and therefore has more favorable service level conditions: Left -turning movements from Ten We Road are within acceptable service levels and will not interfere with through traffic movements. Left -turning traffic exiting to Pine Street, however, will experience severe delays during peak PM periods. The addition of dedicated left -turn lanes will improve this condition. As traffic volumes approach the year 2015 projections, a traffic signal at this intersection should be considered. Please call me if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Patrick Dobie, P.E. Dobie Engineering, Inc. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. STREET LOCATION / COMMENT CITY 'ERWOOD DR S/0 EDNA ST BOISE PM PEAK CLASSIFICATION _. PERSHING DR W/O LATAH ST - CLASSIFICATION PHILIPPI ST N/0 OVERLAND RD SB CLASSIFICATION PHILLIPI ST S/O SPAULDING ST 247 CLASSIFICATION DATE COUNT DIRECTION- AM PEAK PM PEAK 2/23/95 387 NB - 18 Thursday SB SB 33 23 10/21/94 247 186 Friday Tuesday 11/1/95 3,482 NB 90 153 Wednesday 4,017 SB 55 168 11/1/95 569 NB 6 24 Wednesday SB 2 29 S/O TARGEE ST 5/3/95 587 NB 19 30 Wednesday SB 14 33 PHILLIPPI ST N/O BOND ST 4/27/93 186 Tuesday N/O MORRIS HILL RD 7/29/94 4,017 APPROACH & TOTAL Friday S/O GROVE ST 11/15/94 3,620 CLASSIFICATION Tuesday " - S/O MORRIS HILL RD 7/29/94 4,972 APPROACH & TOTAL Friday PIERCE PARK LN N/O STATE ST 10/5/99 7,322 NB ITD COUNT Tuesday SB 'RCE PARK RD W/O CARTWRIGHT RD ADA COUNTY 4/29/98 150 EB 5 7 APPROACH & TOTAL Wednesday WB 1 5 PINE AV W/O MERIDIAN RD MERIDIAN 5/14/96 6,748 EB .. 327 194 VOLUME Tuesday WB 304 410 PINE AVE W/O LOCUST GROVE RD ADA COUNTY 11/4/97 2,765 EB ITD COUNT Tuesday WB E/O E OIST ST MERIDIAN 11/30/99 3,875 EB ITD COUNT Tuesday WB E/0 LINDER RD 1/6/00 4,793 EB 289 162 APPROACH & TOTAL Thursday WB 227 265 W/O E 01ST ST 11/30/99 4,181 EB ITD COUNT Tuesday WB W/O LINDER RD 1/6/00 4,678 EB 261 150 APPROACH & TOTAL Thursday WB 304 243 PINEHURST DR W/O PINEHURST DR BOISE 4/15/94 270 Friday PINTAIL DR E/O LINDER RD MERIDIAN 1/5/94 864 CLASSIFICATION Wednesday PINTO DR N/O AMITY RD ADA COUNTY 8/15/95 96 NB 5 CLASSIFICATION Tuesday SB 6 °LANTATION LANE W/O PLANTATION DR GARDEN CITY 5/3/95 778 EB 55 30 CLASSIFICATION Wednesday WB 15 67 PLEASANT VALLEY RD N/O HOLLILYNN DR ADA COUNTY 10/26/99 3,688 NB ITD COUNT Tuesday SB Counts compiled by ACHD from average daily traffic data collected by ACHD and ITD. 62 Of 80 02 -Mar -00 _ 0) o N VALERI HEIGHTS o Zoning - _A(, E bdiv VICINITY MAP S seg ,F', S3n1w11 0 S3n1w10 300 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 Feet DAVID A BAILEY David A. Bailey 6417 Santa Cruz Dr. CONSULTING Boise, Idaho 83709-6550 (208) 362-6253 CWILINGIN4R2ING(PLANMMlINVESHGA'HONS (208) 870-1013 TO: Shari Stiles City of Meridian 1681 W. Sandalwood Meridian, ID 83642 DATE: February 1, 2000 RE: Valeri Heights Planned Development Ms Stiles: On behalf of Gold River Companies, Inc., we are submitting this application for Annexation and Zoning to R-15 and LO, a Subdivision Preliminary Plat and a Conditional Use Application for 128 Apartment Units, 8 Attached Townhomes and a 26,000 square foot Office Building on 12.73 acres located at the northeast corner of Pine Street and Ten Mile Road. The proposed subdivision consists of 1 Limited Office Lot, 8 Townhouse Lots, 1 Apartment Lot (128 units) and 2 Landscape Lots. We previously submitted an application for Annexation, Subdivision and Conditional Use in July of 1999. The annexation and conditional use were denied and the subdivision application was withdrawn. The previous plan included 18,000 square feet of office space, 158 apartment units and 6 townhouse lots. The configuration ofthe apartments and the townhouses has been significantly changed from that application, the number of units has been significantly reduced and the building layout and appearance has been significantly changed. Many of the recommendations we received from the previous public hearings have been incorporated into this plan, including the removal of all of the previously proposed tandem parking and the creation of more usable open space. The property is currently zoned RT by Ada County. The Meridian Comprehensive Plan designates the area as Mixed Residential, showing these areas on the Comprehensive plan map as buffers between those areas designated for General Industrial and those areas designated for Residential. This proposal provides the ideal transition from Industrial to Limited Office (LO) to Medium High Density Residential (R-15) Apartments to Single Family attached Townhouses located near existing single family residential in Thunder Creek Subdivision. The Apartment portion of the project is in compliance with the Meridian Zoning, Development and Subdivision Ordinances and incorporates the following features: - 2.25 Parking Spaces per unit have been provided, 160 of these spaces are garages. - A Clubhouse with a swimming pool, hot tub, barbecue and half court basketball facility will be provided - Access to the site meets ACHD requirements and provides excellent circulation within the site for emergency access while discouraging cut through traffic from Pine Street to Ten Mile Road. The layout of the access driveways in relation to the apartment buildings also provides additional buffering of the site from adjacent properties. The placement of the garages at the exterior of the property provides additional buffering from adjacent properties. Additional landscaping will be provided in these areas as well. Five foot wide sidewalks are provided throughout the site with stamped concrete walkways across driveways for safety and appearance. Significant landscaping is provided throughout the site including landscape berms adjacent to Pine Street and Ten Mile Road, lighted water fountains in the central courtyard and trees strategically placed within the site to break up the lines of the buildings. Sewer and Water will be extended to the site at the developer's expense. All other utilities are also available to the site. All streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks within the areas to be dedicated for public right of way and all similar improvements on the site will be constructed to ACHD and City of Meridian Standards. All construction on the site will meet ADA and Fair Housing Act accessibility requirements. Cross access easements will be shown on the final plat for access to the Office Space. As shown on the Preliminary Plat Drawing, the Ten Mile Stub Drain currently crosses the Southwest comer of this site in an open condition from Pine Street to Ten Mile Road. The developer will cover this drain at his expense (ACRD has agreed to buy the piping) in order to reduce the safety hazard at this intersection and provide for widening of the roads. All construction will be with the approval of Nampa Meridian Irrigation District. We are submitting with this application copies of a traffic study performed by Dobie Engineering analyzing the traffic impact of this development. The study has taken into account the effect of the high school traffic in this area. We are submitting restrictive covenants for this subdivision for review with this application. The covenants also cover sign restrictions for this site. We are not requesting approval of any sign applications for this site at this time. It is expected that two monument signs meeting city requirements will be applied for in the future, one at each entrance to the site. No signs will be permitted on the Office building which face Pine Street or Ten Mile Road." In accordance with the Planned Development Ordinance, we are requesting a variance from the minimum street frontage requirements for the four interior townhouse lots. Statement of Compliance: 1. All driveways, parking, curbs, gutters and sidewalks will be constructed to Meridian City Ordinance Standards. 2. The proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 3. The development will be connected to City services. 4. This development will be in compliance with Meridian City Ordinances. 5. The preliminary plat will include all appropriate easements. 6. All street names are existing and should not interfere with the City grid. 2 Affidavits: 1. This property will be posted one (1) week before the public hearing with postings containing the name of the applicant, description of the zoning amendment, and time and date of the public hearing. 2. The applicant has read the contents of this application and verifies that the information contained herein is true and correct. D. cc: File #C9913 Vicki Welker — 0)o 4, N VALERI HEIGHTS 0 Zoning E VICINITY MAP o "S3nlwll Stege S = S3n1w10 300 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 Feet N VALERI HEIGHTS 0 Zoning E VICINITY MAP 0 Stseg S '` eg S F< S3n1w11 E�, S3n1w10 300 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 Feet N VALERI HEIGHTS Zoning E VICINITY MAP Stsegiv S S3n1w11 S3n1w10 300 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 Feet CITY OF MERIDIAN EVALUATION SHEET Proposed Development Name Valerl Heights Planned Development File No, P"0-05 Date Reviewed 2/23/00 Preliminary Stage XX Final Engineer/Developer Dave Bailey Consulting 6417 Santa Cruz -Or Boise 09 The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development In accordance with the Boise City Street Name Ordinance. The following streets are exiting and the names shall appear on the plat. ON. TEN MILE RD.` "W PINE ST.' 'N LIGHTING WAY" "N_ GRAY CLOUD WAY" ~r There are_no now street namesproposed for this development 1 11c auuve street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE, AGEN97EPRESENTATNES OR DESIGNEES / // // Ada County Engineer John Priester Date Z Community Planning Assoc. Sue Hansen Date d City of Meridian Cheryl Sable v RS/ Date -.3b4J Meridian Fire Dept. Representative Date 2-Z8�- 00 NOTE: A copy of this mluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed 1111 Subindex Street Index Section NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS Z, 4, 00 TRMLJBSV30t8EFRM ti00'd Fort:30 00/90/to 860SZ9ee0z 5aiie8 ptneQ Fly ✓~`/7 T BOISE AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 633( rr AN AMENDED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIANEANNEXING "(}N NG CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A UCMT'ION OF THE SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 11, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to annex to the said City real property which is hereinbelow described: A tract of land in the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 11, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the section corner common to Sections 2, 3, 10 and 11, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., thence South along the section line common to Sections 10 and 11, 1328.37 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 89°20' East along the North boundary of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 11, 332.03 feet to a point on the approximate centerline of a certain canal; thence South 40°04'40" East along said centerline, 716.11 feet to a point; thence South 58°45'30" East along said centerline, 67.90 feet to a point; thence South 80°14'50" West, 348.42 feet to a steel pin; thence North 88°00' West on a line between two certain ditches, 508.04 feet to a point on the section line common to said Sections 10 and 11; AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - WELKER Page - 1 thence North along said section line, 628.32 feet to the Real Point of Beginning. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the above and referenced real property described as: A tract of land in the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 11, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the section corner common to Sections 2, 3, 10 and 11, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., thence South along the section line common to Sections 10 and 11, 1328.37 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 89020' East along the North boundary of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 11, 332.03 feet to a point on the approximate centerline of a certain canal; thence South 40°04'40" East along said centerline, 716.11 feet to a point; thence South 58°45,30" East along said centerline, 67.90 feet to a point; thence South 80°14150" West, 348.42 feet to a steel pin; thence North 88°00' West on a line between two certain ditches, 508.04 feet to a point on the section line common to said Sections 10 and 11; thence North along said section line, 628.32 feet to the Real Point of Beginning. is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and is zoned R-4 Residential District; that the annexation and zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - WELKER Page - 2 annexation and zoning. Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de - annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements: a. That the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer and resolve how the water and sewer mains will serve the land. b. That the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan adopted January 4, 1994. C. That any development plans will have to show adequate access and will have to meet City requirements and those of the Ada County Highway District. d. That, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G, H 2, K, L of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian. e. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, and 11-9-605 M. which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways. f. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind the applicant, the titled owners, and their assigns. g. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. Section 3. That if Applicant shall fail to meet the above conditions the property shall be subject to de -annexation, which conditions subsequent shall run with land and also be personal to the owner and Applicant. Section 4. That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy of the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - WELKER Page - 3 County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission within ten (10) days following the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 5. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this /5 qday of March, 1994. ATTEST: WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. --/CI STATE OF IDAHO,) . ss. County of Ada, ) CLERK WA �.r.. P. t �j. , ov - i z 9 > SEAL Z. � a # UjWT Q Get ls�. �O h I, WILLIAM BERG, City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Amended Ordinance entitled "AN AMENDED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, T.3N.,R.1W.,B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE", passed as Ordinance No. :3- , by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the 4' AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - WELKER Page - 4 day of a i"Ck , 1994, as the same appears in my office. DATED this 15 day of STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada, ) City Clerk, City of Ada County, Idaho , 1994. 4r «let. Eo y Z 5LAL .7, �L �- 4 C \1Q-1� On this 15 day of March, 1994, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. 1 t0�* 10IIfA,,,�,/ SEAL v f4 Mq tary Public for Idaho siding at Meridian, Idaho commisstion expires 08/02/99 AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - WELKER Page - 5 J------ c�• P f `J -] :-_ •zr ,dM_ I Wf 30�V� 'LJWI Li '• •• d n' �i `' STS` Q J .. :.•. \. � S � �• .Tr I FOR YOUR INFORMATION To: Attn: City of Meridian Company: Fax number: +1 (208) 887-4813 Business phone: From: Terry L. Silsby Fax number: +1 (208) 887-8630 Home phone: Business phone: Date & Time: 9119/00 5:22:10 PM Pages sent: 2 Re: Valeri Heights Subdivision Proposal SEP 19 '00 17:29 1 208 887 8630 PAGE.01 rR. Attn: City of Meridian I object to the high density development of the Valerie Heights subdivision near Pine and 10 -mile due to many issues including traffic density and viable road capacity. I am an associate Real Estate Broker with ERA West Wind of Boise with nearly 10 years experience in real estate site location and market analysis. Thank you for your consideration, Terry L. Silsby 2674 N. Oldstone Way Meridian Idaho 83642 Also others in agreement with my point of view: Laura L. Silsby 2674 N. Oldstone Way Meridian Idaho 83642 Rock and Terryl Brown 2188 Sonoma Meridian Id 83642 898-0650 RECEIVED SEP 2 0 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN SEP 19 '00 17:29 1 208 887 8630 PAGE.02 The Idaho _ Statesman i P.O. Box 40, Boise, Idaho 83707-0040 LEGAL ADVERTISING PROOF OF PUBLICATION Account # DTI# Identification =odd skip Amount: 064514 297146 PUBLIC HEARING and ending with the issue of: AUGUST $168.58 Ordered by: P.O. # Rate Run Dates NT JULY 28, AUGUST 11, 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN Number of Lines 33 EAST IDAHO STREET 56 X 2 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Affidavit Legal # 1 7885 ,�� ran u••�•�� A,BRIC • .fes, o OTAR i . • p(JB0 10 0 �• 0 0•• '• 00 •• •. 9 •000•• P¢ OF I'D801108 Bass'A" JANICE HILDRETH, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That she is the Principal Clerk of The Idaho Statesman, a daily newspaper printed and published at Boise, Ada County, State of Idaho, and having a general circulation therein, and which said newspaper has been continuously and uninterruptedly published in said County during a period of twelve consecutive months prior to the first publication of the notice, a copy of which is attached hereto: that said notice was published in The Idaho Statesman, in conformity with Section 60-108, Idaho Code, as amended for: TWO aconsecutive weekly =single =consecutive daily =odd skip insertion(s) beginning with the issue of: JULY 2 8 , 2000 and ending with the issue of: AUGUST 1 1 2000 STATE OF IDAHO ) )ss COUNTY OF ADA On this 1 1 day of AUGUST in the year of 2000 before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared before me Janice Hildreth known or identified to me to be the person whose name subscribed to the within instrument, and being by me first duly sworn, declared that the state- ments therein are true, and acknowledged to me that she executest the same Notary Public for Idapfi Residing at: Boise, Idaho My Commission expires: LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. on August 15, 2000, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the applications of: City of Meridian for consideration and review of proposed changes to the Landscape Ordinance; Vicki Welker / Gold River Companies for proposed Valerie Heights Subdivision for annexation and zoning of 12.73 acres from RT to L -O and R-15 zones; Preliminary Plat approval of 10 building lots and 2 other lots on 12.73 acres in proposed L -O and R-15 zones; and a Conditional Use Permit for a 128 -unit apartment complex, townhouses and office on 12.73 acres in proposed L -O and R-15 zones all generally located at the north- east corner of Pine Avenue and Ten Mile Road; Gem Star Properties for proposed Autumn Faire Subdivision for annexation and zon- ing of 101.4 acres from RT to R-4 and Preliminary Plat approval for 263 building lots and 12 other lots on 78.4 acres generally located at the southwest corner of Black Cat and Ustick Roads; Gary Benoit for a request to vacate the alley intersecting East 1 st Street between Pine Avenue and Idaho Streets on the east side currently in an OT zone generally located at East 1st Street and Pine Avenue; Randy Ware for annexation and zoning of 2.297 acres from Rl to R-4 generally located at Franklin and Linder Roads; Bond and Shelli Campbell for Preliminary Plat approval of 12 lots on 5.60 acres in an R-4 zone for the proposed subdivision The Hollows generally located north of Ustick Road one-half mile east of Meridian Road; John and Sandra Goade for Preliminary Plat approval of 5 building lots and 1 other lot on 8.29 acres for proposed Waltman Court Subdivision generally located at Waltman Lane and SW 5th; Rod and Sherrie Eisile for a request of a variance allowing applicant to lower finish floor elevation below the Flood Plain because of the size of the site for Eagle Concrete Pumping currently in an I -L zone generally located at Baltic Place in the Meridian Business Park; - Quadrant Consulting for annexation and zoning of seven acres, more or less, for proposed LDS Church generally located south of Overland Road, east of Locust Grove Road on Charolais Drive; Steiner Development, LLC, for annexation and zoning of 10.19 acres from RT to R-8 for Proposed Wilkins Ranch Village planned -unit development, Preliminary Plat approval of 48 building lots with 1 existing home and 5 other lots on 10.19 acres; and a Conditional Use Permit for the planned -unit development consisting of 48 single-family lots ranging from 5252 to 9525 s.f. in a proposed R-8 zone all generally located south of Ustick Road and east of Black Cat Road; - -- `---- ----- - - Chuck a -- Chuck Elliot/Elliot Group, LLC, for annexation and zoning of acres for proposed Elliot Industrial Park for office and shop in an I -L zone, Preliminary Plat approval of two building lots on 5.4 acres, and Conditional Use Permit to construct office and shop all generally located south of Fairview Avenue and east of Locust Grove Road on Wilson Lane; The Bailey Company and TFCM Asscoclates, Ltd., for a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of an Arby's with a drive-thru on property in an 1-L zone generally located on Pad P-2 within the Meridian Crossroads Shopping Cneter at the southeast comer of Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue. Pub. Jul. 28, Aug. 11, 2000 7885 Meridian City Council March 15, 1994 Page 9 suspension of the rules, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow - Yea, Yerrington - Yea, Tolsma - Yea MOTION CARRIED: All yea ITEM #9: AMEND ANNEXATION ORDINANCE #633 FOR VALERI HEIGHTS: Kingsford: AN AMENDED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, T. 3N, R. 1W, B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The reason this was amended is because there was a parcel of land that was excluded that did not allow this property to be contiguous, that has now been included in this legal description. Is there anyone from the public that would like amended Ordinance #633 read in its entirety? Is there a motion? Yerrington: I move that we approve #633 with the suspension of the rules. Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to approve of Ordinance #633 with suspension of the rules, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow - Yea, Yerrington - Yea, Tolsma - Yea MOTION CARRIED: All yea ITEM #10: ORDINANCE #638 - SPORTSMAN POINTE NO. 4: Kingsford: This was an issue that this property didn't get annexed because it was in an area lying outside our Urban Service Planning Area until last fall. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 19, T. 3N, R. 1 E, B.M., AND COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the public that would like Ordinance #638 read in its entirety? Is there a motion? Tolsma: Mayor, I move we approve Ordinance #638 with suspension of the rules. Yerrington: Second Meridian City Council March 15, 1994 Page 10 Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to approve Ordinance #638 with suspension of the rules, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow - Yea, Yerrington - Yea, Tolsma - Yea MOTION CARRIED: All yea ITEM #11: FINAL PLAT: VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION BY VICKIE WELKER AND HUBBLE ENGINEERING: Kingsford: Vickie, are you going to speak to that. Welker: There are a couple of things on Gary Smith's list that I need to address. He is asking on #10 about the square footage on Lot 7 - Block 1, actually 7 through 10 on Block 1. 1 discovered which I didn't realize that the engineer had included the square footage to the middle of the canal which most engineers and developers have been doing. However, we have a fencing requirement along the canal and so we are going to come back the width of the canal itself and 5 feet in the bank and we are working up a improvement agreement with the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District and so I am having the engineers prepare the square footage of each lot so that it has a minimum of 10,000 feet. You will have your 8,000 in any event but I am trying so that we have a minimum of 10,000 square feet in each lot up to the fence line. Which will include 15 feet in the encroachment area and 15 feet of the canal that is not included. And the 15 feet not included will not be included in the net square footage of the lot. I have a pencil drawing if you would like to see how that works out, what changes it might make. Kingsford: Gary, would you like to look at that pencil drawing, are you satisfied that it would meet the square footage requirements for a lot? Smith: Mr. Mayor and Council members, all I was speaking to was the requirements of the ordinance. If she is varying from the ordinance I don't know if I can approve that. Kingsford: She is not varying from the ordinance, I think I am hearing her say. Welker: I am increasing the size, your ordinance requires a minimum of 8,000 and I am trying to get more than that in the lots. So we will have the minimum of 8,000 in all of them. Smith: So, you are decreasing the size of the easement of the ditch then? r ORDINANCE NO. 6 3 3 copy AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 11, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to annex to the said City real property which is hereinbelow described: A parcel of land located in the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 11, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the corner common to Sections 2, 3, 10, and 11, T.3N.,R.1W.,B.M.; thence South 00°00'05" West, 1328.42 feet to the North 1/16 corner; thence South 00°00'04" East, 190.00 feet the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING (INITIAL POINT). Thence South 89°20117" East, 491.10 feet to a point in the center of Eight Mile Lateral; thence along the centerline of Eight Mile Lateral South 39°34148" East, 408.84 feet to a point; thence 114.49 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 21°52100", and a long chord bearing South 50°30148" East, 113.80 feet to a point; thence South 61°26'54" East, 9.02 feet to a point; thence departing said centerline South 80°16100" West, 344.57 feet to a point; thence North 88°01'37" West, 507.99 feet to a point on the section line common to said Sections 10 and 11; thence North 00°00'04" West, 438.22 feet to the point of Beginning comprising approximately 6.73 acres. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - WELKER Page - 1 Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the above and referenced real property described as: A parcel of land located in the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 11, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the corner common to Sections 2, 3, 10, and 11, T.3N.,R.1W.,B.M.; thence South 00000105" West, 1328.42 feet to the North 1/16 corner; thence South 00°00'04" East, 190.00 feet the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING (INITIAL POINT). Thence South 89°20117" East, 491.10 feet to a point in the center of Eight Mile Lateral; thence along the centerline of Eight Mile Lateral South 39034148" East, 408.84 feet to a point; thence 114.49 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 21°5210011, and a long chord bearing South 50°30148" East, 113.80 feet to a point; thence South 61°26154" East, 9.02 feet to a point; thence departing said centerline South 80°16100" West, 344.57 feet to a point; thence North 88°01137" West, 507.99 feet to a point on the section line common to said Sections 10 and 11; thence North 00°00104" West, 438.22 feet to the point of Beginning comprising approximately 6.73 acres. is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and is zoned Low Density Residential District (R-4); that the annexation and zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for annexation and zoning. Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de - annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements: ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - WELKER Page - 2 a. That the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer and resolve how the water and sewer mains will serve the land. b. That the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan adopted January 4, 1994. C. That any development plans will have to show adequate access and will have to meet City requirements and those of the Ada County Highway District. d. That, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address the following, among other items: 1. Inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, K, L of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian. 2. The Applicant and owners of the property, and if required, any assigns, heirs, executors or personal representatives, pay, when required, any impact development fee or transfer fee adopted by the City, if applicable under the development fee or transfer fee Ordinance. e. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, and 11-9-605 M. which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways. f. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind the applicant, the titled owners, and their assigns. g. That if these conditions of approval are not met the property shall be subject to de -annexation. h. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. Section 3. That if Applicant shall fail to meet the above conditions the property shall be subject to de -annexation, which conditions subsequent shall run with land and also be personal to ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - WELKER Page - 3 the owner and Applicant. Section 4. That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy of the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission within ten (10) days following the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 5. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this 1st day of March, 1994. APPROVED: ATTEST: WILLIAM G. BERG, A/. -- CITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO,) . ss. ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - WELKER Page - 4 County of Ada, ) I, WILLIAM BERG, City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OR LAND LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, T.3N.,R.1W.,B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE", passed as Ordinance No. 633 , by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the % s% day of &ak-Cly , 1994, as the same appears in my office. DATED this day of eCi'-el- , 1994. City Clerk, City of Ada County, Idaho STATE OF IDAHO,) • ss. County of Ada, ) March On this 1 day of-Februxrry, 1994, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. SEAL ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - WELKER Notary Publid fo aho Residing at Meridian, Idaho my conunission expires 08/02/99 9`020305 r '11r't N R 801ST P e -- . - -- EST OF 1 L gTENOt �' Qi VI Meridian City Council February 15, 1994 Page 29 Palmer: My lot is 200 feet deep. Yerrington: Fine, thank you. Kingsford: Thank you, anyone else from the public that would like to offer testimony on this conditional use permit? Seeing none I will close the pub!ic hearing. Tolsma: Mr. Mayor, I move we approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law prepared for P & Z, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow: Yea, Yerrington: Yea, Corrie: Yea, Tolsma: Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: Is there a motion on the Conditional Use? Morrow: Move the approve. Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to approve the Conditional Use permit for Leslie Palmer, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow: Yea, Yerrington: Yea, Corrie: Yea, Tolsma: Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #11: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION BY VICKIE WELKER AND HUBBLE ENGINEERING: Kingsford: I"II now open the public hearing on that issue and invite Vickie to come forward. and begin the testimony. Meridian City Council February 15, 1994 Page 30 Vickie Welker, 1145 West State, was sworn by the Attorney. Welker: I have a number of issues on this application I'd like to address. The original intention of this subdivision we submitted this application on the first day of the moratorium las May or June. The original intention of this subdivision is for it to be a small privat exclusive subdivision with a park in the middle to be maintained by a Horn owners Association and the use of the park to be only for homeowners. This w II be 16 lots, a minimum of 10,000 square foot lots going up to 20,000 and the homes will be the larger higher end homes much of what you see in the parade of homes. The first issue I would like to ask the Mayor, I am required in the preliminary plat requirements to tile the ditch, I was going to put in an application for the variance such as they did on Park side Creek but I understand you are in the process of putting together an amendment to amend the Ordinance so the applications are no longer necessary, so I needed to ask am I supposed to do an application or is that being taken care for me or what it your wish? Kingsford: I would suggest that you probably go ahead with the application, so you would be that far along when we get that Ordinance changed. What is the size of that ditch Vickie? Welker: Its over 48 inches, so it comes under the fencing requirements that you are now doing. It is the Eight Mile Lateral. Its the same one that Parkside Creek had, I'm just on the other side of Ten Mile from that. So, it is my intention not to tile, it is my intention to fence it and we do plan to use a 6 foot chain link fence, however I might tell ou that chain link is easier for kids to get across because I used to do it as a kid Kingsford: I think though technically a kid that can get across a chain link fence is also going to be able to better handle a ditch. We are more concerned with the younger ones. Welker: Well that is what our intention is to do the chain link and I don't have a problem with doing a concrete foundation along the bottom of it where kids can't or animals cannot dig under it if so requested. The park is planned to have parking, we do not plan to put a sidewalk because it is a private park for the use of the homeowners only. We do plan to let the homeowners park around it because its for the u e of the homeowners and their own parking only. I do not have a problem with 3utting no parking signs on the corners where access to the main entrances are so that the visibility is not deterred for that purpose, if that is Meridian City Council February 15, 1994 Page 31 what you want done. Do you want me to point out the locations that I have in mind? Corrie: This is not a sidewalk here, this is a sidewalk here, but there is nothing here? So its 36 feet from the sidewalk to the edge of the park (End of Tape) Kingsford: Is that the same plat Vickie as we have? Welker: Yes Kingsford: We're having a real problem with some of these submitalls in that the maps keep changing. Corrie: This is the other one we had, there was no park on it at that time. So, what do you have coming up here, just nothing? Welker: Just nothing, we were going to put a curve around it but not a sidewalk, because the owners want natural landscaping (inaudible) and potentially put a pond and a fountain in the park area for the residents. Tolsma: Its another 7 feet from here to here then. Welker: If you feel th road is too narrow, I suppose we can discuss that. Because its private we, didn't feel it needed to be a larger road because we are not planning on anyone going through it from the other subdivision and that is the next stage to discuss. Corrie:. So this is a private road not dedicated to the County? Welker: No, it is dedicated to the County. Corrie: Well, its not a private road then. Welker: I mean private use of the subdivision, its not a private road. Because you only have residents o one side all the way around, its not intended that there would be public parki g out there, it would only be if the residents park there. Kingsford: Well, virtually sidewalks are on both sides when you look at it from that standpoint. Meridian City Council February 15, 1994 Page 32 Corrie: Are you going, to have gate type of entrance to keep it private? Welker: I don't know if it will have a closed gate, but it will be I'm planning on (inaudible) with very tall tower type gate looking entrance so it looks private and very exclusive. I do intend to put chain link fence around the entire subdivision not just the ditch area Kingsford: Certainly, if its a public street you wouldn't be able to Welker: Right, but w could fence it, it has to remain open. It will have the look as if it could be done hat way. It is what we are planning. So, we don't want to use the sidewalk forte park, and we do not a problem with no parking signs. (Inaudible) on these corners here so that (inaudible) onto the main road is not cut off. I don't see any other her spot than these 3 corners. Kingsford: What is the normal culdesac radius? Tolsma: Well, we are 50 feet from south to here, there is a curve in there 3 feet wide. Welker: On the culdesac we would put no parking signs there, we wouldn't want anybody parking on the inside of that culdesac. And we have reduced the size of the culdesac by 3 feet to accommodate the concerns of the fire department and the disposal trucks as well. Morrow: You are talking on the radius on what amounts to block 1, a 50 foot radius for the overall culdesac and the interior deal is a 20 foot radius. So that leaves the effective use of the road at 30 feet. Welker: No, 23 1 think. Morrow: So, your 50 foot is to the back of the sidewalk? Welker: Yes, so it sh uld be a sufficient turnaround there. We wanted a larger culdesac again for Ian scaping purposes. Now, with regard to the request with the Highway District on the south stub street, this was discussed with Larry Sale at the last Planning a d Zoning meeting and also discussed with Planning and Zoning because of th exclusive use we want to the subdivision we do not want a stub street to the sou h and this has been discussed with Mr. Fuller who is the owner to the south a d he does not request or require a stub street to his Meridian City Council February 15, 1994 Page 33 property. currently h owns 14 acres on the corner of Ten Mile and Pine, he is planning on holding 10 acres for future development and because he has access to both roads he does not need a stub street into our subdivision. We do not want public access in there except off of Ten Mile because of the planning that we are trying to do the Marketing theory that we are trying to use for this subdivision. I would however not have an objection in talking to Wayne Forrey this afternoon, I would not have an objection to having a 10 foot easement between some of the lots there or between 2 of the lots there to provide pedestrian or bicycle pathway so the children can go through that on through to the next subdivision when developed to get over, to the high school on Pine Street rather than going down ten Mile to Pine. I don't have a problem with doing that. And also I do have to work out the fencing and requirements with Mr. Fuller with regard to the ditch that he has that runs on the outh side of our property. He has a little ditch that is on his property which woulc not be affected by us but we would make sure that our fence was far enoug back from that so he doesn't have difficulty keeping the weeds down and keeping care of that. And I will work with him to show him what kind of a fence a are going to put in and how that is going to be done and whether or not we would need to concrete under it or just exactly how we would do that to satisfy him. The sewer easement we have already provided, there has been a discussion of access to the gentleman to the east of us who has the property east of the Eight Mile Lateral and we are providing a 20 foot sewer easement that will be fenced and will be in accordance with my discussion with Gary Smith, we will a putting pit run and gravel in there but it is a finished easement and it will I ie fenced off and we will provide a manhole out by the Lateral so that when he sewer needs to come across there the manhole is already there and they don't iave to dig up that easement or that area to provide for it. I was to work with Gay on the final engineering, I would however like to make, I don't have a problem with that being a condition of this approval but I would like to request that if during the final engineering design we find that the landowner has made arrangemelits or finds access to sewer from another direction that my easement if it is not required by him if he doesn't need it. Which would make our lots larger again and not have to do that improvement if it is not needed by his property. He does have access to other properties, whoever inserts sewer and its also the whatever co nes first situation. We will have a homeowners association which will take care f the maintenance of weeds and the 30 foot easement out to the road, we have all eady provided the 40 foot right of way from the center of Ten Mile for the Highway District, 20 feet of which we would be maintaining until they are ready to use it and 15 feet additionally that we have for our own easement where we will put our own landscaping and entry fence to make the project more exclusive. I have a question in here, it was noted on the Highway Meridian City Council February 15, 1994 Page 34 District letter that says the site is across Ten Mile from the (inaudible) new elementary school and the access layout for the school could be compromised due to my entrance. No one has brought that up to me and I don't know whether that is a problem if it has peen resolved or what, perhaps you could bring me up to speed on that. Kingsford: Do you have a comment on that either Wayne or Bruce? Forrey: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, in a meeting with Dan Mabe this morning at 9:00 he indicated that would probably have that school developed within the next 5 years and sooner if the demand presented itself, but that was on the schedule. Some ime between now and the next 5 years it would be there so at least from the sch of district standpoint that issue is resolved. They have a site and they have a sch dule. Kingsford: How did it fit in with relationship to this plat, again with regard to foot traffic is that the proper place for that foot traffic? Forrey: Yes it woulc be, the layout here is fine for the school because it is on the other side of Ten Mie road. Our concern on the south was for the high school future linkage onto tie property on the south side to go between subdivisions because there is not stub street shown to the south in this revised layout. Although that was a point of discussion at the Planning and Zoning Commission. Welker: I'm sorry I �hought they were talking about the new school across the street on Ten Mile as opposed to the south, so I misunderstood that. Kingsford: Does th4t answer your question then? Welker: Yes, it does. Okay, last but not least is the with the stub street to the south that the last Planning & Zoning hearing Larry Sale said that the Highway District would not h 3ve a problem with eliminating the south stub street as long as the City Council was in agreement that what we were doing satisfied them. So that is my request. Any questions? Kingsford: Questions from the Council? Mr. Morrow Morrow: Yes, I wa t to revisit this so that it is clear in my mind on this item #7 underneath the Finc ings of Fact, this side is across Ten Mile road from the proposed new elementary school and if this proposed street location is approved Meridian City Council February 15, 1994 Page 35 the access layout for the school could be compromised due to the intersection off set requirements. The City of Meridian should coordinate with school district for the school access layout and determine whether they want to allow the layout for this project to be apposed. Now if I'm interpreting that correctly what the discussion Mr. Forrey just had this is that the 2 roads don't line up directly, we were talking with respect to paths or something like that. And if the school is going to locate a site there sometime between now and 5 years do they have a layout for their entry road to the school site and so how does that apply to item #7? If she is going to do her project first then the school would have to design their access around what she has already got, is that correct? Forrey: That would be correct. Morrow: So that is how we as a City would choose to handle it, she is there first so the school comes later and they can design to her project. That is the only question I have. Kingsford: Any other questions? Is there anyone else from the public that would like to offer testimony? Coe Parker, 2930 West Pine, was sworn by the Attorney. Parker: I have the property that is directly across the Eight Mile Lateral and my concern is that I have a piece of land locked property here and I wanted to make sure I have an access to the sewer and water. I had Hubble Engineering draw up a proposed preliminary plat and he I think is also the engineer that did the Valeri Heights subdivision and I hadn't seen this until today when he drew it for me but I would tike to show you. This is the Lateral and this is my property here. I have a lane here that is just an easement, I don't own the property. Haven Cove is here and (inaudible) is here. So I'm completely land locked here and I need access to sewer and water is. Kingsford: When you say land locked your just talking about land locked in regard to sewer. Parker: (Inaudible) they have a stub street here but I think its down here someplace. This property (inaudible). Kingsford: Hubble has shown this exit out at this point here. Meridian City Council February 15, 1994 Page 36 Parker: Yes, I need s me sort of exit out of this property here and something here. I talked to Eddy and he says he has no problem with it, but there is a street here someplace but I'm not sure where it is. Corrie: It doesn't line up with Haven Cove where you have it at the top? Parker: I don't think its here. Corrie: So, in other ords you could adjust your lots to go to that. Parker: This property has a stub street into it. Kingsford: Most likel then what we would ask you to do with regard to the sewer easement is dc the same thing as Valeri Heights is proposing is have a graveled access, easc ment for the City to operate a sewer line if it goes between lots. We are very skeptical of sewer between lots, w must have plenty access and something we don't have a weed problem with. Freckleton: Mr. May r, one thing w have special requirements, we don't allow easements we require 20 foot wide lot that is owned and maintained by the homeowners associat on. Kingsford: Well, it wuId stili have to be an easement, I mean if its a homeowners lot we still have to have an easement to access it. Council have any questions for Coe? Morrow: I have one question, you have no objection to the deletion of the stub street as per the request for Valeri Heights? Parker: To the south, no. Kingsford: Anyone el a from the public that would like to offer testimony on this issue? Dave Fuller, 890 Ten Mile, was sworn by the Attorney. Fuller: I'm the one th y are talking about that is south of the property that she wants to develop. I wrote her a letter saying that I didn't care about stubbing the street in or anything, but if you guys study this property and everything its going to develop and its going to develop soon. If she builds real expensive homes here Meridian City Council February 15, 1994 Page 37 and the we don't plar on it in the future they are not all going to be real expensive homes in that area. If you looked at all of them around in that area a lot of them are mid-range homes I would say. So, I would just request that you guys look over this and plan Pa kers deal, and I've got a big corner there. There is another gentleman here that is a neighbor that he is going to have property to develop too. And I don't have aaV paperwork to show you right off the bat but you just need to plan what is best for he City on this deal, keep it in mind because that whole corner is going to develop. With the school and with the traffic and if she wants to put in a gate so th kids can walk through the subdivisions that is fine with me but the streets is kind of what I'm concerned about, its going to happen quick and should have some planning done to it. Not just on individual subdivision basis maybe it should have more of a comprehensive type deal for the whole corner. That is all I have, any questions? Tolsma: I have one, your property abuts Pine Street and Ten Mile? Fuller: Yes, I have the largest portion on the corner. Tolsma: So you have ingress and egress on your property, that is what I thought it was. Fuller: So they can back the subdivisions up back to back if you want without having through streets if that is in the Comprehensive Plan. Its up to you guys, from what this other gentleman gave an instance earlier about a different situation you didn't have enOL gh ins and outs, I'm kind of concerned a little bit about that too. She did say she would work with me on the fencing, I operate a small farm there right now and here is going to be a big easement field, so I have to work out something with Nampa Meridian Irrigation. Where they put the fence or bury the ditch on whoeve 's side it is is going to be up to them to take care of it. They are going to have to work with us on that, she said she would. Corrie: Mr. Mayor, minor question. Do you plan on developing that yourself or selling it and having it developed, because you mentioned size of homes and cost of homes, are you planning on doing that yourself? Fuller: Yes, I have r lans for the property other than residential, but the Council doesn't really like that, I wanted storage buildings. So I know it is going residential, I'm just saying if you put them real fancy homes there, when we go to develop., I've already offered it to some developers at a price to sell so it is going to happen and if the try to stop me from developing in the future because they've Meridian City Council February 15, 1994 Page 38 got real fancy homes and the other developers want to put in more smaller homes and smaller lots I'm just concerned about what your overall plan is. It needs to be taken into account. Morrow: If I could make a comment there, quite frankly there is no way that we as the City Council can mandate what type of housing goes in what area from our City standpoint it is nice to have some more upper scale housing. We've got a ton of entry level housing and that type of thing and from the tax base and those areas it would be nice to have upper scale stuff. The people who basically make that judgement call would be you the landowner or the developer you choose to sell to and his operation. So actually you would have more control of that than do we. It would nice frm our standpoint to see a continuation of upper scale housing in that area t at least middle income and up type of housing. So, I think with the size that Ten Mile will ultimately be as a street and the fact that I believe Pine Street is designated a collector that we won't see the types of problems with respect that we are seeing in the center valley area that the gentleman earlier was referring to. Also there is a major redesign of Franklin road being done as speak now and so that will solve a lot of the issues with respect to that area too. Fuller: I guess what I was referring to was if you build a $200,000 lot right next one they want to bu Id maybe a $120,000 onto this association that is going to be there already in place is going to come back over and say no. There is going to be some rebuttal there and the $120,000 that you thought maybe entry level in California but a lot opeople here that all they can afford that is high standard. so wanted to bring th t to your attention, planning for the area for the future. Kingsford: Your viewpoint is well taken there Dave. I've had experience that the neighbors are in and what they typically like to see is more expensive and not less expensive. I think what Walt is saying is their zoning might be R-4 they will have to meet those zoning requirements whatever it is, but we can't dictate the price level. Fuller: I understand that Kingsford: Now we might have something happen as has happened in the area south of the freewa that maybe there would be a rural transition or something of that nature, but cert inly we will try to work those out as compatible as possible. Fuller: Just a question to you then with her private type subdivision which you know I kind of like myself but that's what I will be putting in too, a private type Meridian City Council February 15, 1994 Page 39 subdivision that in non -connecting it will probably loop clear around from Pine to Ten Mile in a loop type situation but as the City Council and the streets go, you've got to make that deciion I can't. Kingsford: And of course we will look at that as well as the Highway district and also with some real concern about land locking anybody. Anyone else from the public? Welker: Just an addi Tonal comment perhaps for City Council's information as well as Mr. Fuller's when developer decides to put in a very exclusive subdivision and you are not sure wha is going to go around you it is more my obligation or responsibility to buffer against that as I plan with my amenities and putting my buffers so that my hc meowners don't have a problem with what comes in the future regardless of what it might be, because I can't control that. That will be more my job to do aa developer than it will be the next developer to buffer against me. Kingsford: Certainly your sales depend on that. Anyone else from the public. Seeing none I will close the public hearing, Council members. Morrow: My major concerns here are with respect to the size of the island and culdesac, I think that we can sit here at a design level and say that everything is going to work out in terms of subtracting and adding feet. From a practical standpoint I think that the landscaped island it too big to make the culdesac on a daily basis function f r both our emergency services and our praticals and so think I'd like to see more net road with than the 23 feet that we are talking about in terms of her prese itation. I'm not totally convinced having done things in Spring Meadow and Fliver Run where those types of culdesacs have been done. The net effect of those is after the projects are done they are not very functional. It is always kind of a hassle getting not only emergency vehicles but just the neighborhood cars and neighborhood usage done. It looks great on paper but in the real world it doesn't work too well. So I think my preference would be we have more distance here maybe even consider not having the little landscaped deal in the center of the culdesac. And that is all that I have with respect to this project. Kingsford: Any other comments Council? Tolsma:. I think I agree with Walt's sympathies on that because the garbage trucks or the trash trucks in town are going to have to circle that culdesac for the trash Meridian City Council February 15, 1994 Page 40 and if anybody parks in there, even if there are no parking signs or not if they park there they can't get through there. The 22 feet is pretty narrow. Kingsford: Of course you still have that outside radius looks to me like the thing that heavy equipment is going to be working against anyway not the interior. I share Walt's comment with regard to the vegetation after what it looks like maybe after the fact, but I think there are some neat things that could be done. I will defer to your better judgement, I've not worked with one of those. What is the Council's pleasure wi�h regard to the annexation and zoning, is your desire to have the City Attorney do an Ordinance for Annexation and Zoning? Corrie: I would so move Mr. Mayor. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Bob, second by Max to have the City Attorney prepare an Ordinance for annexation and zoning, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All yea Kingsford: Is there a motion on the preliminary plat? Wayne Crookston: Are you going to approve the Findings of Fact? Kingsford: I suppose better. Morrow: So moved Crookston: There was different testimony but not necessarily detract. Kingsford: Entertain a motion on the Findings. Morrow: So moved Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, .second by Max to approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on the annexation and zoning request for Valeri Heights subdivision, roll call vote. Meridian City Council February 15, 1994 Page 41 ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow: Yea, Yerrington: Yea, Corrie: Yea, Tolsma: Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: The next item with regard to Valeri Heights is the preliminary plat, is it the desire of the Council to approve the preliminary plat or is your desire to re- negotiate the radius of the culdesac? Morrow: I'll propose the motion that we change the turning radius within the culdesac, possibly eliminating the center island or down sizing it. Kingsford: I think the, correct approach is to approve the preliminary plat subject to substantive review of the culdesac. Morrow: Well stated, so moved Corrie: Second Kingsford: Moved bV Walt, second by Bob to approve the preliminary plat subject to substantive revievy of the culdesac interior, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: "Yea ITEM #12: PROCLA ATION: PRAYER VIGIL WEEK: Kingsford: Whereas, the American Mothers, Inc., places great emphasis on the importance of motherhood and strengthening the moral and spiritual foundations of the home; and Whereas, stability in families and communities lies in the moral values of the people; and Whereas, these values basically are learned in the home through teaching and through examples set by parents and family members; and Whereas, mothers and fathers, both young and old, are aware of the awesome responsibility they have to teach moral and spiritual values; and Whereas since Idaho is experiencing significant population growth with accompanying social problems, prayers are especially needed to fortify the moral foundation of our homes and children; Now, therefore, I Grant Kingsford, Mayor of Meridian do hereby proclaim February 25 through March 6, 1994 to be Prayer Vigil Week. ITEM #14: BRIAN THREET: REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY SALES TRAILER IN CONIFER SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON NORTH TALL PINE PLACE, LOT 1, BLOCK 1: MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR, COUNCIL, PLANNING & ZONING FROM: Gary D. Smith, PE , RE: VALERI HEIGHTS SUBD. (Annexation, Zoning, Preliminary Plat) RECEIVED OCT 1 1 1933 COUNCILMEN CITY- �R�et ZVAN MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning & Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI October 11, 1993 5. Are there any property that nee 6. What is the a irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the to be continued? icant planning ;for t 7. Water and sewer main locations neer to meet standard corridor locat_innG'_ Eight Mile Lateral? be somewhat revised 8. No sidewalk is shown around Lot 1- Block 4 (Park). Sidewalk doesn't appear to be necessary however, approval to delete should be requested. HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live City Clerk WILLIJANIC CITY JANICE GASS, Treasurer GASS,Treasur OF MERIDIAN BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief BILL GORDON, Police Chief Phone (208) 888-4433 GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR, COUNCIL, PLANNING & ZONING FROM: Gary D. Smith, PE , RE: VALERI HEIGHTS SUBD. (Annexation, Zoning, Preliminary Plat) RECEIVED OCT 1 1 1933 COUNCILMEN CITY- �R�et ZVAN MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning & Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI October 11, 1993 5. Are there any property that nee 6. What is the a irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the to be continued? icant planning ;for t 7. Water and sewer main locations neer to meet standard corridor locat_innG'_ Eight Mile Lateral? be somewhat revised 8. No sidewalk is shown around Lot 1- Block 4 (Park). Sidewalk doesn't appear to be necessary however, approval to delete should be requested. to'1 Meridian City Council Meeting:_ FEBRUARY 15. 1994 Applicant: VICKIE WELKERAND HUBBLE Agenda Item Number: I 1 ENGINEERING Request: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVSION A en Comments City Clerk: City Engineer:. SEE ATACHED COMMENTS City Planning Director: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS City Attorney: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW City Police Dept: "REVIEWED" City Fire Dept: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS City Building Dept: Meridian School District: SEE ATTACHED COMMETNS Meridian Post Office: Ada County Highway District: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS Ada Street Name Committee: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS Central District Health: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS Nampa Meridian Irrigation: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS Settlers Irrigation: Idaho Power: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS US West: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS Intermountain Gas: Bureau of Reclamation: I / W OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. GROOKSTON, JR., Attorney MEMORANDUM HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TO: CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR FROM: WAYNE S. FORREY, PLANNING DIRECTOR DATE: FEBRUARY 11, 1994 RE: ANNEXATION/ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP Planner & Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman - Planning & Zoning This project was held up for 6 months waiting for adoption of the Comprehensive Plan Update. The developer, staff, Highway District and adjacent property owners have been working on several issues throughout this period to achieve a good development project. To help move this project efficiently through processing steps, the Applicant has submitted a Final plat application and it has been circulated to various agencies for comment. It is now the annexation, Preliminary plat, and Final plat application are ready for City Council action. A Development Agreement is required prior to signature by the City Engineer or City Clerk. 1 recommend that the annexation and preliminary plat be approved subject to compliance with the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and then the City Council could approve the Final plat conditioned upon a signed Development Agreement at the next scheduled City Council meeting which is March 1, 1994. This approval schedule would help expedite this project with adequate and proper safeguards for City review and plat signatures when appropriate. Memorandum To: Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission and City cil From: Wayne S. Forrey, AICP - Planning Direct Date: October 6, 1993 Regarding: Anne: Subdivision by Vi Land Use request of R-4 com Proposed Comprehensive'Pla Meridian School District is in of this proposed development areas. The proposed Compr Annexation or a Deve needed by ACRD for to R-4 I available n designates a future I-84 Ten eement should stipulate need 1 improvements. RECEIVED 0 C TCWN71L"93 RONALD R. TOLSMA CITE' V XYE�HR111MOJIIAN ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning & Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI of Valeri Heights -1hensive Plan. ;neral area. The V school just west within service Interchange. I ROW as Teleconference with Hubble En11 gineers on 06 Oct, 93 indicated that the developer is evaluating a possible variance to allow fencing instead of tiling the Eight Mile Lateral. On Nov. 3, 1993 the City Council will hear a request from Parkside Creek developers to fence instead of tile the Eight Mile Lateral immediately northwest of this site. Prior attempts by other developers to fence the Kennedy Lateral (about the same size as this lateral) have been denied by the City Council. Tiling of this lateral will be required in accordance with City ordinances unless a variance is approved. r� HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live OFFICIALS A EACP,City Clerk CITY OF MERIDIAN JANICE GSS,Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water works Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief Phone (208) 888-4433 BILL GORDON, Police Chief FAX (208) 887-4813 GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor Memorandum To: Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission and City cil From: Wayne S. Forrey, AICP - Planning Direct Date: October 6, 1993 Regarding: Anne: Subdivision by Vi Land Use request of R-4 com Proposed Comprehensive'Pla Meridian School District is in of this proposed development areas. The proposed Compr Annexation or a Deve needed by ACRD for to R-4 I available n designates a future I-84 Ten eement should stipulate need 1 improvements. RECEIVED 0 C TCWN71L"93 RONALD R. TOLSMA CITE' V XYE�HR111MOJIIAN ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning & Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI of Valeri Heights -1hensive Plan. ;neral area. The V school just west within service Interchange. I ROW as Teleconference with Hubble En11 gineers on 06 Oct, 93 indicated that the developer is evaluating a possible variance to allow fencing instead of tiling the Eight Mile Lateral. On Nov. 3, 1993 the City Council will hear a request from Parkside Creek developers to fence instead of tile the Eight Mile Lateral immediately northwest of this site. Prior attempts by other developers to fence the Kennedy Lateral (about the same size as this lateral) have been denied by the City Council. Tiling of this lateral will be required in accordance with City ordinances unless a variance is approved. c(opy BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION VICKIE WELKER ANNEXATION AND ZONING A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11, T 3N , R 1W, B.M., ADA COUNTY MERIDIAN, IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for consideration on October 9, 1993, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the Council having heard and taken oral and written testimony and the Applicant not appearing but through her engineer, Matt Munger, and having duly considered the matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of public hearing on the annexation and zoning was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for October 9, 1993, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the October 9, 1993, hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations; 2. That the property included in the application for annexation and zoning is described in the application, and by this FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 1 reference is incorporated herein; that the property is approximately 8.75 acres in size but only 6.77 acres is being platted; the parcel is on the east side of Ten Mile Road north of Pine and south of Cherry Lane Road; that Matt Munger stated at the hearing that the residential development would be 21 lots 16 of which would be building lots; that the density would be 2.6 units per acre; that the lot sizes would vary from 10,000 to 21,000 square feet; that the homes constructed would be around 2,400 square feet; that access would be from Ten Mile Road; that the Ada County Highway District wanted a stub street rather than the cul- de-sac to access property to the west; that no sidewalk was planned around the common lot in the center of the proposed subdivision which was approximately 12,000 to 13,000 square feet; that Eight Mile irrigation lateral would be tiled; that there would be no pressurized irrigation ; that drainage would be retained on-site. 3. That Coe Parker testified that he had no frontage to develop his property and that he desired access to sewer and water from or through this parcel. 4. That Dave Fuller testified that he had questions over access to water in a tiled lateral and he had concern over sewer to the land that he owned and possibly would develop for commercial use. 5. That the property is presently zoned by Ada County as RT and the proposed use would be for R-4 residential type development as above stated. 6. The general area surrounding the property is used FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 2 agriculturally but there is residential development occurring to the north and east across Eight Mile Lateral and across Ten Mile Road and to the west which are single family developments. 7. That the property is adjacent and abutting to the present City limits. 8. The Applicant is not the owner of record of the property, but it has submitted the consent of the titled owners, DeWayne and Millie Bailey. 9. That the property included in the annexation and zoning application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 10. That the parcel of ground is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the current Meridian Comprehensive Plan and the proposed Comprehensive Plan. 11. That the Application requests that the parcel be annexed and zoned R-4 Residential; that the applicant indicated that the intended development of the property is for single family dwellings. 12. That the property is in the WARRIOR Neighborhood as set forth in Policy Diagram in the current Meridian Comprehensive Plan; that the property is in the Meridian Schools Neighborhood District as designated in the proposed Comprehensive Plan; that the proposed Comprehensive Plan designates the area where the land in the application is located to be a mixed residential area; that under Housing Development on page 25 and 26 of the Current Comprehensive Plan, property inside the Urban Service Planning Area may be FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 3 developed at greater densities than one dwelling unit per acre and it is the policy that a density of greater than 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres may not be exceeded outside of the Urban Service Planning Area. 13. That in the Rural Area section of the currant Comprehensive Plan it does state that land in agricultural activity should so remain in agricultural activity until it is no longer economical to exclude orderly growth and development to maintain agricultural pursuits. 14. That the proposed Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Residential Policies, 2.1U states as follows: "Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi -family, townhouses, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities." 15. That the proposed Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Rural Areas, 6.3 c., it states as follows: "Within the Urban Service Planning Area development may occur in densities as low as 3 dwellings per acre if physical connection is made to existing City of Meridian water and sewer service and the property is platted and subdivided . 16. That the proposed Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Rural Areas, 6.4, it states as follows: "Residential development is allowed in the rural area provided that said development does not exceed the Rural Residential Agricultural density, unless it is inside the Urban Service Planning Area and City sewer and water is provided, when Low, Medium and High density residential may be considered. All residential development must also comply with the other appropriate sections of this plan." 17. That the proposed Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 4 .01-1 Population, Housing Policies, at page 66, it states as follows: "1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile homes, multi -family, townhouses, apartments, condominiums." "1.3 An open housing market for all persons, regardless of race, sex, age, religion or ethnic background." "1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping centers should be encouraged." 18. That there is a population influx into the City of Meridian at the present time which has been going on for some time and is likely to continue; that the land is relatively close to Meridian and economic conditions are making it difficult to continue farming in the area. 19. That the property can be serviced with City water and sewer at this time. 20. Meridian Police Department, Nampa -Meridian Irrigation District, Settlers Irrigation District, Ada County Highway District and Bureau of Reclamation may submit comments and such shall be incorporated herein as if set forth in full; that the Meridian City Engineer, Central District Health Department, Meridian Fire Department, Idaho Power, and the Meridian School District submitted comments and they are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 21. That the comments from the City Engineer regarding determination of ground water level and subsurface soil conditions, water and sewer main locations, and providing sanitary sewer through this property to Coe Parker, are specifically and duly noted. 22. That the comments from the Meridian Fire Chief were that FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 5 there should be a stub street south into other land and he questioned who would take care of the 30 foot easement regarding trash and weeds. 23. That the Planning Director, Wayne Forrey, commented that right-of-way for future Ten Mile Road improvements needs to be dedicated as needed by the Ada County Highway District. 24. That the R-4 Residential District is described in the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 3. as follows: "R-4) Low Density Residential District: Only Single Family Dwellings shall be permitted and no conditional uses shall be permitted except for Planned Residential Development and public schools. The purpose of the (R-4) District is to permit the establishment of low density single-family dwellings, and to delineate those areas where predominately residential development has, or is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, and to protect the integrity of residential areas by prohibiting the intrusion of incompatible non-residential uses. The (R-4) District allows for a maximum of four ( 4 ) dwelling units per acre and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian." 25. The Meridian School District submitted comment and such is incorporated herein as if set forth in full; its comment was that there is no excess capacity in the schools of the District and that residents of the new subdivision could not be assured of attending the neighborhood schools; the School District asked for support for a development fee or a transfer fee to help offset the costs of building additional schools. 26. That in 1992 the Idaho State Legislature passed amendments to the Local Planning Act, which in 67-6513 Idaho Code, relating to subdivision ordinances, stated as follows: "Each such ordinance may provide for mitigation of the effects FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 6 of subdivision development on the ability of political subdivisions of the state, including school districts, to deliver services without compromising quality of service delivery to current residents or imposing substantial additional costs upon current residents to accommodate the proposed subdivision."; that the City of Meridian is concerned with the increase in population that is occurring and with its impact on the City being able to provide fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services to its current residents and to those moving into the City; the City is also concerned that the increase in population is burdening the schools of the Meridian School District which provide school service to current and future residents of the City; that the City knows that the increase in population does not sufficiently increase the tax base to offset the cost of providing fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services; and the City knows that the increase in population does not provide sufficient tax base to provide for school services to current and future students. 27. That pursuant to the instruction, guidance, and direction of the Idaho State Legislature, the City may impose either a development fee or a transfer fee on residential property, which if possible would be retroactive and apply to all residential lots in the City, because of the imperilment to the health, welfare, and safety of the citizens of the City of Meridian. 28. That Section 11-9-605 C states as follows: "Right-of-way for pedestrian walkways in the middle of long blocks may be required where necessary to obtain convenient pedestrian circulation to schools, parks or shopping areas; the pedestrian easement shall be at least ten feet (10') FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 7 wide." 29. That Section 11-9-605 G 1. states as follows: "Planting strips shall be required to be placed next to incompatible features such as highways, railroads, commercial or industrial uses to screen the view from residential properties. such screening shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') wide, and shall not be a part of the normal street right of way or utility easement;" 30. That Section 11-9-605 H 2. states as follows: "Existing natural features which add value to residential development and enhance the attractiveness of the community (such as trees, watercourses, historic spots and similar irreplaceable amenities) shall be preserved in the design of the subdivision;" 31. That Section 11-9-605 K states as follows: "The extent and location of lands designed for linear open space corridors should be determined by natural features and, to lesser extent, by man-made features such as utility easements, transportation rights of way or water rights of way. Landscaping, screening or lineal open space corridors may be required for the protection of residential properties from adjacent arterial streets, waterways, railroad rights of way or other features. As improved areas (landscaped), semi - improved areas (a landscaped pathway only), or unimproved areas (left in a natural state), linear open space corridors serve: 1. To preserve openness; 2. To interconnect park and open space systems within rights of way for trails, walkways, bicycle ways; 3. To play a major role in conserving area scenic and natural value, especially waterways, drainages and natural habitat; 4. To buffer more intensive adjacent urban land uses; 5. To enhance local identification within the area due to the internal; linkages; and 6. To link residential neighborhoods, park areas and recreation facilities." 32. That Section 11-9-605 L states as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 8 Bicycle and pedestrian pathways shall be encouraged within new developments as part of the public right of way or as separate easements so that an alternate transportation system (which is distinct and separate from the automobile) can be provided throughout the City Urban Service Planning Area. The Commission and Council shall consider the Bicycle -Pedestrian Design Manual for Ada County (as prepared by Ada County Highway District) when reviewing bicycle and pedestrian pathway provisions within developments. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met, including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. 2. That the City of Meridian has authority to annex land pursuant to 50-222, Idaho Code, and Section 11-2-417 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that exercise of the City's annexation authority is a Legislative function. 3. That the Planning and Zoning Commission has judged this annexation and zoning application under Section 50-222, Idaho Code, Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Meridian City Ordinances, the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the record submitted to it and things of which it can take judicial notice. 4. That all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been complied with. 5. That the Commission may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and State. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 9 6. That the land within the proposed annexation is contiguous to the present City limits of the City of Meridian, and the annexation would not be a shoestring annexation. 7. That the annexation application has been initiated by the Applicant with the consent of the titled owners and the annexation is not upon the initiation of the City of Meridian. 8. That since the annexation and zoning of land is a legislative function, the City has authority to place conditions upon the annexation of land. Burt vs. The City of Idaho Falls, 105 Idaho 65, 665 P.D 1075 (1983). 9. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, and 11-9-605 M. which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways. 10. That this Application has been submitted prior to the adoption of the proposed amendment to the Meridian Comprehensive Plan; that as a condition of annexation the Applicant, and titled owners, must agree that the proposed Meridian Comprehensive Plan, once adopted, shall apply to the land and any development. 11. That since the Applicant's property is in the WARRIOR NEIGHBORHOOD of the CURRENT Comprehensive Plan, the annexation and zoning Application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and do not conflict with the Rural Areas policies; it further is in compliance with the proposed Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 12. That the requirements of the Meridian City Engineer, FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 10 Central District Health Department and Meridian Fire Department, and of the Ada County Highway District, Settlers and Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, if submitted shall be met. 13. That all ditches, canals, and waterways shall be tiled as a condition of annexation and if not so tiled the property shall be subject to de -annexation. 14. That the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer and resolve how the water and sewer mains will serve the land; that the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance; that, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall be require#d to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address the inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, K, L and the comments of the Planning Director, Wayne Forrey, relating a school site; that the development agreement shall, as a condition of annexation, require that the Applicant, or if required, any assigns, heirs, executors or personal representatives, pay, when required, any development fee or transfer fee adopted by the City; that there shall be no annexation until the requirements of this paragraph are met or, if necessary, the property shall be subject to de -annexation and loss of City services, if the requirements of this paragraph are not met. 15. That proper and adequate access to the property is available and will have to be maintained. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 11 16. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind the applicant, the titled owners, and their assigns. 17. That if these conditions of approval are not met the property shall be subject to de -annexation. 18. With compliance of the conditions contained herein, the annexation and zoning of R-4 Residential would be in the best interest of the City of Meridian. 19. That if these conditions of approval are net met the property shall be subject to de -annexation. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. COMMISSIONER HEPPER COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE COMMISSIONER SHEARER COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) VOTED VOTED VOTED VOTED VOTED FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 12 DECISION AND RECOMMENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the annexation and zoning as stated above for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and that the Applicant and owners be specifically required to tile all ditches, canals and waterways as a condition of annexation and that the Applicant meet all of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian, specifically including the development time requirements and the required development agreement, and the conditions of these Findings and Conclusions of Law, and that if the conditions are not met that the property be de -annexed. MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 13 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk RONALD R. TOLSMA L. CITY OF MERIDIAN MAX MAX YERRINGTON GARY D.SMTHJANICE SP.E.City EngnMeer ROBERT BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WALT W. MORRROWW JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief "BILL" MERIDIANIDAHO 83642 Planner & Zoning Administrator W.L. GORDON, Police Chief , JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. GROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Chairman - Planning & Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian CITY COUNCIL, may we have your answer by: February 9 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 1/27/94 HEARING DATE: 2/15/94 REQUEST: Annexation /zoning and Preliminary Plat for Valeri Heights BY: Vickie Welker and Hubble Engineering LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: East of Ten Mile Road and North of Pine Avenue JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON,C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIIDAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFF.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST (PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUR OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER • -J` � ` qq YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: RECEIVED OCT O 1 i'�COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA RQ�� j,GJESLER CITY Off' t,z MA�SERhrNGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning & Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian _ 0155%ort, may we have your answer by ,xs LtaQ3_- TRANSMITTAL DATE:Zg -'Da_ 3 HEARING DATE: 12; i 4 '1 REQUEST: ��1o►'t, 4U IQ' t�h �(N'i/KrJ Ce (644 ValtrIL 1-kil4s on. BY: V(CLA.i WAIkQNr r LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT e� i, w q S.Ejc,;A (( T>11 k 1 W T2�. IM, Road ad � � el hr good HUB OF TREASURE VALLEI JIM JOHNSON P/Z A Good Place to Live OFFICIALS S. FORREY. CITY Off' MERIDIAN GASS.TeasureP,CityClerk JANICE GASS. Treasurer JAICE ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT BRUCE D. STUART. Water Works Suot. 33 EAST IDAHO WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 KENNY BOWERS. Fire Chief Phone (208) 888-4433 BILL GORDON. Police Chief IDAHO POWER CO;. -(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4813 MAX YERRINGTON, C/C GRANT P. KINGSFORD BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. Mayor RECEIVED OCT O 1 i'�COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA RQ�� j,GJESLER CITY Off' t,z MA�SERhrNGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning & Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian _ 0155%ort, may we have your answer by ,xs LtaQ3_- TRANSMITTAL DATE:Zg -'Da_ 3 HEARING DATE: 12; i 4 '1 REQUEST: ��1o►'t, 4U IQ' t�h �(N'i/KrJ Ce (644 ValtrIL 1-kil4s on. BY: V(CLA.i WAIkQNr r LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT e� i, w q S.Ejc,;A (( T>11 k 1 W T2�. IM, Road ad � � el hr good JIM JOHNSON P/Z _' MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) JIM SHEARER, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR`:DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATIONDISTRICT BOB CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO;. -(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BOB GIESLER, C/C U S: WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) MAX YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. CITY FILES BUILDING INSPECTOR OTHER: FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: POLICE DEPARTMENT m r; Dia, r& Lt�0 L��•� ` CITY ATTORNEY -S�e- ,e- a -5#� b GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER Tk"40 *4,,Q- [a+k-,- �s��vt�. IjL10 WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER 7-/.a- gtiz s C r+R E C- 0 E.�Se'v-4� ,l� a— % /"1 ^ SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS RECEIVED Bob L. Haley Oa DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT EXCE� gs, ti` Dan Mabe, Finance &Administration FEEE — It §99 t DIRECTORS 2 f► Sheryl Belknap, Elementary in CITY OF MERIDIAN Jim Carberry, Secondary Christine Donnell, Personnel Q y Doug Rutan, Special Services ie JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.2 911 MERIDIAN STREET • MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 • PHONE(208)888-6701 January 26, 1994 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Valeri Heights Subdivision Dear Councilmen: I have reviewed the application for Valeri Heights Subdivision and find that it includes approximately 16 homes at the median value of $140,000. We also find that this subdivision is located in census tract 103.1 and in the attendance zone for Meridian Elementary, Meridian Middle School and Meridian High School. Using the above information we can predict that these homes, when completed, will house 4 elementary aged children, 5 middle school aged children, and 4 senior high aged students. At the present time Meridian Elementary is at 102% of capacity, Meridian Middle is at 127% of capacity and Meridian High School is at 123% of capacity. The Meridian School District is not to opposed to growth in our district, however this subdivision will cause increased over- crowding in all three schools. There is little opportunity to shift attendance boundaries since the surrounding schools are also well over capacity. Before we could support this subdivision, we would need land dedicated to the district or at least made available at a minimum price for a school site in this area. The site would need water and sewer service available. In addition we would need to pass another bond issue for the construction of schools. The cost per student for newly constructed schools, excluding site purchase price and offsite improvements, exceeds $5,000 per elementary student and $10,000 per middle or high school student. We are in a difficult position and need your help in dealing with the impact of growth on schools. Sincerely, Z6rls?5� Dan Mabe Deputy Superintendent DM: gr z a SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS n Bob L. Haley Iko EXCEL` RECEIVED DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT Dan Mabe, Finance & Administration OCT 0 5 1993 DIRECTORS Sheryl Belknap, Elementary ndary CITY 0l i� EK11 Jim seineCarbry, nec, Personnel I;IAN Christine Donnell, Personnel Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.2 911 MERIDIAN STREET • MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 • PHONE(208)888-6701 September 30, 1993 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Valeri Heights Subdivision Dear Councilmen: I have reviewed the application for Valeri Heights Subdivision. This planned development will accelerate the need for Joint School District No. 2 to construct additional classrooms and/or to adjust school attendance boundaries. Meridian Schools do not have excess capacity. Nearly every school in the district is beyond capacity. The Meridian School District supports economic growth for Idaho and specifically the district's area, but such growth produces a need for additional school construction. We ask your support for a development fee statute on new home construction or a real estate transfer fee to help offset the costs of building additional school facilities. If this support is lacking then we ask that additional residential development be denied. Residents of the new subdivision cannot be assured of attending the neighborhood school as it may be necessary to bus students to available classrooms across the district. We ask that you assure the developer will provide walkways, bike paths and safe pedestrian access. Sincerely, 4-089� m Dan Mabe, Deputy Superintendent DM: gr JAMES E. BRUCE, President GLENN J. RHODES, Vice President SHERRY R. HUBER, Secretary Vicki Welker P.O. Box 888 Meridian ID 83642 FROM: Larry Sale, Supe is Development Se 0 C T 2 5 1993 CITY OF MERIDIAN October 21, 1993 SUBJECT: VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION - PRELIMINARY PLAT On October 20, 1993, the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District (hereafter called "District") approved the Preliminary Plat as stated on the attached staff report. In order that the Final Plat may be considered by the District for acceptance, the Developer shall cause the following applicable standard conditions to be satisfied prior to District certification and endorsement: 1. Drainage plans shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. 2. If public street improvements are required: Prior to any construction within the existing or proposed public right-of- way, the following shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District: a. Three complete sets of detailed street construction drawings prepared by an Idaho Registered Professional Engineer, together with payment of plan review fee. b. Execute an Inspection Agreement between the Developer and the District together with initial payment deposit for inspection and/or testing services. C. Complete all street improvements to the satisfaction of the District, or execute Surety Agreement between the Developer and the District to guarantee the completion of construction of all street improvements. ada county highway district 318 East 37th - Boise, Idaho 83714 - Phone (208) 345-7680 October 21, 1993 Page 2 3. Furnish copy of Final Plat showing street names as approved by the Local Government Agency having such authority together with payment of fee charged for the manufacturing and installation of all street signs, as required. 4. If Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund deposit is required, make deposit to the District in the form of cash or cashier's check for the amount specified by the District. 5. Furnish easements, agreements, and all other datum or documents as required by the District. 6. Furnish Final Plat drawings for District acceptance, certifications, and endorsement. The final plat must contain the signed endorsement of the Owner's and Land Surveyor's certification. 7. Approval of the plat is valid for one year. An extension of one year will be considered by the Commission if requested within 15 -days prior to the expiration date. Please contact me at 345-7680, should you have any questions. LS cc: Development Services Chron Meridian City Hall Hubble Engineering n JAMES E. BRUCE, President GLENN J. RHODES, Vice President SHERRY R. HUBER, Secretary TO: ACHD Commission T N`I'ER -DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE L7ALERIHT/DSTECH 1.0-13-93 DATE: October 15, 1993 FROM: Development Services SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION (Developer - Vicki Welker, P.O. Box 888, Meridian, ID 83642) (Engineer/Surveyor - Hubble Engineering, 9550 Bethel Ct., Boise, ID 83709) FACTS & FINDINGS: 1. Valeri Heights is a 16 -lot single family residential subdivi- sion on 6.8 acres of property located on the east side of Ten Mile Road approximately 800 -feet south of Cherry Lane. There will be 1,040 -feet of new public streets added to the system. This subdivision would be expected to add 160 vehicle trips per day to Ten Mile Road. 2. Ten Mile Road currently has 50 -feet of right-of-way and is improved with 24 -feet of pavement. This section of Ten Mile is on the ACHD Five Year Work Program. The 2000 Urban Functional Street Classification Map designates Ten Mile as a minor arterial roadway. The District requires a minimum of 90 -feet of right-of-way on arterials in an urban area, width sufficient for 5 traffic lanes, 5 -foot sidewalks, and bicycle pathways. The ultimate right-of-way will be ac- quired now as development is occuring. The developer will be required to provide a deposit to the Public Rights -Of -Way Trust Fund for 5 -foot sidewalk. 3. The ACHD Capital Improvement Plan indicates that Ten Mile is not approved for use of Road Impact Fee funds to increase its capacity; therefore, Road Impact Fee offsets may not be given for construction of the roadway improvements along Ten Mile, but may be given for right-of-way dedication in addition to what exists now. If the developer wishes to be paid for the additional right-of-way, he/she must submit an application to ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 PRELIMINARY PLAT - «,ERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION .-. October 15, 1993 Page 2 the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACRD Ordinance #188. 4. Staff recommends that a stub street be provided to the south boundary for a future inter -neighborhood connection. 5. A park is planned for Lot 1 of Block 4, but no parking area is shown. Much of the frontage around the park would have to be posted for No Parking to enhance corner visibility. 6. The landscape island on Lot 1 of Block 3 in the cul-de-sac appears to be too big to allow a garbage truck to maneuver around it without riding up on the curb or sidewalk to the inside and outside. 7. This site is across Ten Mile Road from a proposed new elementa- ry school, and if this proposed street location is approved, the access layout for the school could be compromised due to intersection offset requirements. The City of Meridian should coordinate with the school district for the school access layout and determine whether they want to allow the layout for this project to be approved. 8. This application was heard by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission on October 12, 1993. SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: 1. Dedicate 45 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Ten Mile abutting parcel (20 additional feet). The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone. 2. Provide a deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund at the District for the required street improvements (5 -foot sidewalk) on Ten Mile abutting parcel. 3. Direct lot or parcel access to Ten Mile is prohibited, in compliance with District policy. Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. 4. Provide stub streets to the south boundary of the property. Coordinate locations with District Traffic Services staff and the adjacent property owner. 5. The landscape island in the cul-de-sac shall be reduced in size to allow a standard garbage truck to maneuver around it. PRELIMINARY PLAT - " ERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION October 15, 1993 :Page 3 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS: 1. Street and drainage improvements required in the public right- of-way shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and policies. 2. Dedicated streets and drainage systems shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and poli- cies. 3. Specifications, land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACHD shall be sealed, signed and dated by a. Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54-1215. 4. Provide written approval from the appropriate irriga- tion/drainage district authorizing storm runoff into their system. 5. Locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drain- age appurtenances, etc.) outside of the proposed street im- provements. Authorization for relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. 6. Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across par- cel. 7. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District for review and appropriate action. 8. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and appropriate action by ACHD. The proposed drainage system shall conform to the requirements of the City of Meridian and shall retain all storm water on-site. Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the public right-of-way or in a drainage easement set aside specif- ically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, or other valuable amenities placed in said easement. Drainage easements and their use restrictions shall be noted on the plat. 9. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for review and appropriate action by ACHD. 14. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5 -feet from the side lot property lines when the driveways are not being shared with the adjacent property. PRELIMINARY PLAT - V. IRI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION October 15, 1993 Page 4 11. Developer shall provide the District with a copy of the record- ed plat prior to the installation of street name signs. Street signs will not be ordered until all fees have been paid and a copy of the recorded plat has been provided to ACHD staff. The copy of the recorded plat shall show the recording information as inscribed by the Deputy County Recorder. 12. Install a stop sign on every unsignalized approach of a project street to an intersection involving a collector or arterial as the cross -street. The stop sign shall be in- stalled when the project street is first accessible to the motoring public. 13. A right-of-way permit must be obtained from ACHD for all street and utility construction within the public right-of- way. Contact Construction Services at 345-7667 (with zoning file number) for details. 14. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any require- ment or policy outlined herein shall be made, in writing, to the Manager of Engineering Services within 15 calendar days of the original Commission action. The request shall include a statement explaining why such a requirement would result in substantial hardship or inequity. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. STAFF SUBMITTING: DATE OF COMMISSION APPROVAL: OCT 2 0 1993 Larry rale PRPTOSED VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION LANE Rom PAjtKSI&,c CRFgit. iuQDrvtStoN 04VEN Covt< SUgDtVISIoN �lS]CtSYlW, C 1y (•IMKS FEET N r m 0 ° rKOPOsEb A^/ N-MTtev � VALrAt 115, s SuBDrr. PINE AVE. F 0 2000 4000 IN ROAD C RECEIVED o c r 14 g1g9g9t,3 SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET CITY O MIERIUTAN Proposed Development Name VALERI HEIGHTS SUB City MERIDIAN Date Reviewed _10/07/93 Preliminary Stage XXXXX Final Engineer/Developer Hubble Enqr. / Vicki Welker Date Sent The following SUBDIVISION NAME is approved by the Ada County Engineer or his designee per the requirements of the IDAHO STATE CODE. not contiguous choose another name X d Dated The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Meridian City Street Name Ordinance. The following existing street names shall appear on the plat as: "WEST CHERRY LANE" "NORTH TEN MILE ROAD" The following proposed street name is over ten letters in length and cannot be approved unless Ada County Highway District will aproved the length of the street "WEST VALERI HEIGHTS COURT" The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE Ada County Engineer John Priestei Ada Planning Assoc. Meridian Fire Dept. Terri Raynor Representative t DESIGNEES Date l Date " Date NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed !!!! Sub Index Stet Index NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS OK /O -- f Z II i v D4 �4 CF, ENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT Rezone # REVIEW SHEET RECEIVE Environmental Health Division FEB - 4 199ii CITY OF MERIDIAN Conditional Use # Preliminary / Final / Short Plat 11 % 4=r Return to: ❑ Boise ❑ Eagle ❑ Garden city Meridian ❑ Kuna ❑ ACz ❑ 1. We have Objections to this Proposal. ❑ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ❑ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ❑ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ❑ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ❑ high seasonal ground water ❑ solid lava from original grade ❑ 6. We can Approve this Proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: ❑ 2 feet ❑ 4 feet 7. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: 0 central sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water well ❑ interim sewage Q central water ❑ individual sewage ❑ individual water 8. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: V central sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water ❑ sewage dry lines �- central water 9. Street Runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ❑ 10. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ❑ 11. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ❑ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ❑ food establishment ❑ swimming pools or spas ❑ child care center ❑ beverage establishment ❑ grocery store 13. yr`. -11' /✓,27— Date: ?�tf'�i�'7f//r�ai%�`�� ;. l:rpsr• or r�T� ��) s Reviewed By: CDHD 10/91 rcb, rev. 11/93 ill CENTRAL REC�iV EU •• DISTRICT w HEALTH OCT 0 8 1993 Return to: DEPARTMENT F-]Boise CITY OT ��t��$t�.i� E] Eagle REVIEW SHEET ❑Garden City Rezone # _ —� '�-Meridian I Use # ❑ Kuna Preliminary/ 'nal/Short Plat _F/L/ jf�lC� ��✓�5��.�� ❑ ACz ❑ 1. We have no objections to this proposal. ❑ 2. We recommend denial of this proposal. ❑ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this proposal. ❑ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can comment. ❑ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewge disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of ❑ high seasonal ground water ❑ solid lava from original grade ❑ 6. We can approve this proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: ❑ 2 feet ❑ 4 feet 7. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: Central sewage ❑ Community sewage system ❑ Community water well ❑ Interim sewage J?J Central water ❑ Individual sewage ❑ Individual water 8. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: Central sewage Community sewage system F-1 Community water ❑ Sewage dry lines Central water 9. Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding probelm. ❑ 10. This department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ❑ 11. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ❑ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan reiew for any: ❑ Food establishment ❑ Swimming pools or spas ❑ Beverage establishment ❑ Grocery store ❑ 13. ❑ Child Care Center DATE: Reviewed by: /I CDHD 10-91 rcb i HUB OF TREASURE VALLE) OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live COUNCILMEN WAYNE S. F , Treasurer AICP, City Clerk CITY O MERIDIAN ROBERT GIESLER RONALD R. TOLSMA JANICICE GASSsurer BRUCE D. STUART, TreaWater Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON. JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO ROBERT D. MAX YERRINGTON NGTON JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. CORRIE MERIDIAN KENNY BOWERS. Fire Chief , IDAHO 83642 Chairman Zoning & Planning BILL GORDON, Police Chief t� Phone (208) 888-4433 JIM JOHNSON GARY SMITH, P.E.. City Engineer ■ - ) FAX (208) 8874813 Centennial Coordinator GRANT P. KINGSFORD PATSY FEDRIZZI Mayor TRANSMITTAILN'TO�AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the MeridianZs,n', � wtissio✓L may we have your answer by : —t_�C-_I _ I It?!?�_ TRANSMITTAL DATE: t 3 HEARING DATE : 6_& /2, 1 'q'q3 � SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT 808 CORp;c C/C ` tREQUEST: 1I01f4t 121 Ca(UA Valer� (*r;_+ S i�tSr'on. MAX YERRINGTON, C/C BY:. Vic t 1. Aiye r BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: WL POLICE DEPARTMENT a CITY ATTORNEY Loca-t"d Qn2v. 1 P/" Agad JIM JOHNSON P/Z , __„liEt;IDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) JIM SHEARER, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR.. DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT 808 CORp;c C/C iDAO POWER CU_. -(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BOB GIESLER, C/C US WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) MAX YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. CITY FILES BUILDING INSPECTOR OTHER: FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: WL POLICE DEPARTMENT a CITY ATTORNEY GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER _ n ° Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District's Eightmile Lateral courses along the north boundary of this project. The right-of-way of the Eightmile Lateral is 60 feet: 30 feet from the center each way. See Idaho Code 42 -1208 --RIGHTS-OF-WAY NOT SUBJECT TO ADVERSE POSSESSION. The developer must contact John P. Anderson or Bill Henson at Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, 466-0663 or 345-2431, for approval before any encroachment or change of right-of-way occurs. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District requires that a Land Use Change/Site Development application be filed for review prior to final platting. Contact Donna Moore at 343-1884 or 466-7861 for further information. All laterals and waste ways must be protected. Municipal surface drainage must be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must review drainage plans. The developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805. It is recommended that irrigation water be made available to all developments within Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. Bill Aenson, Foreman Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District RECEIVED ��Ivugauau 2�c�auct 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-888-6201 14 October 1993 Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Boise 343-1884 Hubble Engineering SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 9550 Bethel Court Boise 345-2431 Boise, ID 83709 RE: Land Use Change Application and Other Pertinent Information Dear Hubble Engineering: Enclosed please find a packet containing the following information: 1. Land Use Change Application 2. Information Regarding Urban Irrigation, i.e. Idaho Code, contracts, petitions, specifications for install 3. Information Regarding Local Improvement District 4. Information concerning Exclusion Filing a Land Use Change Application is a requirement of Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District to allow the development process on Valeri Heights Subdivision to proceed. The blue form at the front of the packet explains the Land Use Change process and fees and also contains the application for your use. If you have any questions concerning the Land Use Change application Or the need further information concerning urban irrigation, please feel free to call on Donna Moore at the District's office. Page 1 of 2 COp� APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 RECEIVED 14 October 1993 Hubble Engineering QCT i 8 1993 Page 2 of 2 If you have questions concerning the development itself, please call on John P. Anderson, District Water Superintendent for Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District at the Shop telephone number listed above. DAREN R. COON, SECRETARY/TREASURER NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT DRC/dnm cc: File Water Superintendent Meridian Planning & Zoning Vicki Welker '0000 OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk JANICE GASS. Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS. Fire Chief BILL GORDON. Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E.. City Engineer HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 FAX (208) 8874813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor SEP 301993 RECEIVED OCT 0 5 1993 CITE' Ox": 11-1L'R1DiAN COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERT GIESLER MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning 6 Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian , may we have your answer by: TRANSMITTAL DATE: FS HEARING DATE: 2 �Q�3 REQUEST: j�o►2 In R' c 11#ffHa rat cutLLd 1V' aleriL E kijk+S 5 Miiion. B Y : LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: ..w \tq S,Q.Cpn'; �� `j/�II I` ►W JIM JOHNSON P/Z :MERIDIAN SCHOOL DhSTRICT MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) JIM SHEARER, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION We require a permanent 10 -foot wide public utilities easement along all lots adjacent to a road right-of-way dedicated to public or private use. Tim Adams Idaho Power 322-2047 �W I� 01_30.83 * OAN 2 81994 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk CITY OF MERIDIAN MAX GTON ROBERTRTD. JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer D. CNGTON GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer ORRIE WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO E S. FORREY, AICP KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief & Zoning Administrator W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642� JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. GROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 8874813Icman - Planning & Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 FEB1 IT1��i GRANT P. KINGSFORD r CU G�� Mayor C1TY U TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian CITY COUNCIL, may we have your answer by: February 9, 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 1/27194 HEARING DATE: 2/15/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning and Preliminary Plat for Valeri Heights BY: Vickie Welker and Hubble Engineering LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: East of Ten Mile Road and North of Pine Avenue JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON,C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT ------- MERIIDAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFF.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST (PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUR OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES We require a permanent 10 -foot wide public utilities easement along all lots adjacent to a road right-of-way dedicated to public or private use. Tim Adams At,A^ Idaho Power 322-2047 Li ) 19 9 3 DATE: MERIDIAN PLANNING ^� ZONING AGENDA ITEM NUMBER APPLICANT: OCjJI-� AGENCY MERIDIAN POLICE - MERIDIAN FIRE DEPT. - MERIDIAN CITY ENGINEER - MERIDIAN ATTORNEY - MERIDIAN POST OFFICE - MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT - MERIDIAN BUILDING DEPT. - ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT - ADA STREET NAME COMMITTEE - CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH - NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION - SETTLERS IRRIGATION - IDAHO POWER - US WEST - INTERMOUNTAIN GAS - BUREAU OF RECLAMATION - MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY - MERIDIAN PLANNING DIRECTOR - OTHER COMMENTS: COMMENTS: Planning and Zoning November 9, 1993 Page s south because its, that property is going to have difficulty serving back into that corner next to the canal. By the same token there is a need to have a utility extension across the drainage ditch to the east into the neighboring property, we would support the extension of a street in that same corridor, and then drop our request for the extension to the south boundary as long as we get a way out of the property that is our primary concern. Shearer: I hear what he is saying, but I don't know what we would approve if we approve something. Johnson: Okay, thanks Larry I appreciate it. What is your pleasure, would you like to take action on the Preliminary Plat at this time? ` M Rountree: r. Chairman, I make a motion that we visit the recommendation on the Preliminary Plat at such time we see the plat revised for the conditions in the Findings of Facts, and the requirements of the City Engineer. Shearer: Second Johnson: We have a motion and a second, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #3: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING TO R-4 BY EDWARD A. JOHNSON: Johnson: Any comments at all, Commissioner Hepper? Hepper: No, I have none. Johnson: Mr. Shearer? Shearer: I have none. Johnson: Mr. Alidjani? Alidjani: ON the same changes you made before on item #19. Johnson: I had one other spelling, minor spelling on item #2 on page 2, it should read additional, its about 10 lines down from the top, righthand side of the page. Any other comments? I like this new format of Findings of Fact, where it address the Comprehensive Plan. It's a little more detail I think a better job, more encompassing. Any Discussion? Entertain a motion for approval. Planning and Zoning November 9, 1993 Page 3 ITEM #2: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING TO R-4 WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION BY VICKI WELKER: Johnson: Any discussion regarding these Findings of Facts? Shearer: On page 2, about half way through the page, they talk about a stub street rather than a cul de sac to access property to the west it says, that should be to the east I believe. Because the cul de sac is on the east end of the property and the west side is bound by the street, Ten Mile. Johnson: Do you agree with that Wayne? Crookston: Yes I do. Johnson: Any other corrections? There is one minor typo, item 19 page 12. Any other discussion? Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I make a motion that the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopt and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions with the noted changes. Hepper: Second Johnson: A motion and second to approve Findings of Fact and Conclusions with corrections. Shearer: Could I get a clarification? Johnson: Go ahead Shearer: We're a little bit vague I think, maybe not , in that we say that the subdivision will meet the requirements of the City Engineer, the City Engineer's notes on this indicates it may be necessary to provide sanitary sewer through the property, I wonder is that been established that we do need sanitary sewer through the property, and is that in conjunction with the elimination of the cul de sac and putting a stub road. Johnson: Well, I think what the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law is saying, is that he determines that to be the case and that's the course we'd have to follow. Is that how you interpret that rather than be that specific? Crookston: Yes, at this juncture the Findings are really part of the annexation only and not of the plating, but those comments are very relevant to the annexation. Planning and Zoning November 9, 1993 Page 4 Johnson: In other words, I don't think it has to be decided on as long as, only the City Engineer decides in that specific area with these comments. Shearer: Are we addressing the Preliminary Plat tonight on this? Rountree: Not until we address the Annexation Shearer: Well I just wondered it says with Preliminary Plat, and that's why I was wondering. Rountree: You could make a recommendation Shearer: You could Johnson: We'd have to do that afterwards. Shearer: Okay I've delayed this long enough. Johnson: Okay, we have a motion and a second, this is a Roll Call Vote. Roll Call Vote: Hepper: Yea, Rountree: Yea, Shearer: Yea, Alidjani: Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Johnson: Any recommendations for the City Council? Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I move that the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the annexation and zoning as stated above for the property described in the application in the condition set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions. Hepper: Second Johnson: Moved and seconded to pass on the decision, the recommended decision to the City Council, all in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Johnson: Any comments or instructions regarding the Preliminary Plat? Mr. Forrey Forrey: Thank you Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, this particular application was submitted and processed by the City as Planning and Zoning November 9, 1993 Page 5 a Annexation and Zoning request with a Preliminary Plat, it was done at the request of the applicant and with support of the city staff because this project and one other project were held up during the moratorium. We agreed to try and expedite after the moratorium was lifted any project that we possibly could with fairness to the development community, so a recommendation if you agree or if you choose to do this would be to if you can to act on the Preliminary Plat to keep it moving onto the City Council schedule if possible. Johnson: Okay, thanks Wayne for that explanation. Gary Smith, is there any comment you have regarding the Preliminary Plat please? Smith: Mr. Chairman, Commission members, I have a very preliminary comment on this sewer. It appears as though, and working with the engineer with Haven Cove Subdivision, that extension of that sewer from Haven Cove into and through Dr. Coe's property is going to be very "iffy" as far as maintaining a depth a reasonable depth on the sewer. By the time the sewer gets to the southwest corner of Haven Cove its only approximately 4 feet deep, and to carry it on into Dr. Coe's property to serve all of his it doesn't appear that it's a workable solution. So I think that when all the calculations are in we'll find we need to come from Ten Mile Road to serve his property with sewer, gravity wise. And to do that means crossing the Eight Mile Lateral and my attitude towards sewer lines and something other than public right of way is not very good, so I guess from that standpoint I would support a stub road from this property to Dr. Parker's and I guess that would fall in line with the Highway District's suggestion of stubbing into his property for access. Now there will also be a possibility of an access out of the southwest corner of Haven Cove. Presently that Preliminary Plat doesn't show an access at that point, they show 3 accesses along their south boundary and one of them I believe was fairly close to Dr. Coe's property or it was common to his east property and his neighbor to the east, but that stub road on that southerly most east -west street in Haven Cove could be moved east and west. So there is a possibility of 2 access points for vehicles. Are there any questions you might have. Johnson: Do you have any questions of Gary or Wayne Forrey? Hepper: So are looking at that sewer coming out of Haven Cove or coming down Ten Mile? Smith: No, I think the sewer for Dr. Coe's property will need to come form Ten Mile through this proposed subdivision rather than out of Haven Cove, it appears as though we're only about 4 feet deep at Haven Cove's south boundary. It doesn't look like it's lo—.1 Planning and Zoning November 9, 1993 Page 6 deep enough to get back into Dr. Coe's property, because the sewer line is coming uphill upgrade faster than the ground is. Hepper: What is the distance that they will have to bring that sewer from down at Ten Mile? Smith: Well, they have to bring it, Valeri Heights has to bring it down Ten Mile anyway, so it is just a matter of extending it. Instead of cul de sac in Valeri Heights it will be a stub street to their east boundary and it would be just a matter of extending the sewer to their east boundary or to Eight Mile Lateral. Rountree: Excuse me, where is the sewer coming from if Valeri Heights doesn't bring it from Ten Mile? Shearer: They are Rountree: Why is it so low then coming through Parker's property? Shearer: That is Haven Cove Smith: Haven Cove's sewer, because Haven Cove's sewer is out of the Nine MiI07"gunk line, over on the west side of the Vineyards subdivision. And in order to get sewer to the southwest corner of Haven Cove we had to run some of it at .3% which is less than the minimum .4% required by the State of Idaho, when we do that the City of Meridian has to state that we understand it's less than minimum grade and we understand that there is a possibility of increased maintenance required on that sewer line, but that is the only way we can get sewer into that southwest corner of Haven Cove. When the sewer line was extended south on Ten Mile Road from Cherry Lane it was my intention all along that we could get the sewer almost to Pine and that the property to the west, to the east of Ten Mile Road to the north of Pine could sewer back to Ten Mile Road. So Valeri Heights falls into that service area, Dr. Coes, Dr. Parker's falls into that same area. And right now the sewer is at the roadway that accesses the Fuller Park or the Little League Baseball fields. Anything else I can answer? Johnson: I don't think so Gary, thank you. Any other questions, any comments Mr. Sale? Sale: No Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission for the record, I'm Larry Sale of Ada County Highway District, we wrestled with the question of access out of this subdivision for sometime with the applicant, we should support the comments Mr. Smith made regarding the extension of streets and especially if its necessary to provide sewer out of this project. If I understood that correct, are you suggesting to extend the street out of Haven Planning and Zoning November 9, 1993 Page 7 Cove to serve Dr. Coe's property or out of this one? How about the stub street? I have told Dr. Coe, or is it Parker or Coe? Johnson: I think its Coe -Parker. Sale: That we would support an extension of a street out of Haven Cove, and the utilities are obviously up to you folks. Shearer: Now you have confused me. I was under the impression that we were taking a stub street out of Valeri Heights also in place of the, isn't that what the recommendation said? Sale: The Highway District recommendation was to stub a street to the south boundary of Valeri Heights, parallel to the drainage ditch. Shearer: Okay Johnson: Any other discussion, are you still confused? Shearer: I didn't think I was confused before. I just wondered if maybe we should see a revised Preliminary Plat before we make approval and recommendation, show these changes. Johnson: Is that a motion? Shearer: I don't know. What does everybody else feel on this? Rountree: My question goes back to what Larry said, that is at one point in time we had a recommendation and that's reflected in the Findings of Fact that there is a stub street as opposed to a cul de sac to the east of the subdivision, and that I would be consistent with what Gary wants in terms of a public right of way and a utility corridor, correct. But not necessarily what ACHD is asking for. Johnson: Mr. Hepper what do you think? Hepper: I don't know, I'm kind of confused on this too now. As I understand the Highway Department is asking for a stub street to the east. Johnson: We don't have a larger map, do we? Rountree: Jim has one right here. Sale: We were aware of the utility problems that Mr. Smith has identified. We felt there should be a stub connection to the Planning and Zoning November 9, 1993 Page 8 south because its, that property is going to have difficulty serving back into that corner next to the canal. By the same token there is a need to have a utility extension across the drainage ditch to the east into the neighboring property, we would support the extension of a street in that same corridor, and then drop our request for the extension to the south boundary as long as we get a way out of the property that is our primary concern. Shearer: I hear what he is saying, but I don't know what we would approve if we approve something. Johnson: Okay, thanks Larry I appreciate it. What is your pleasure, would you like to take action on the Preliminary Plat at this time? Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I make a motion that we visit the recommendation on the Preliminary Plat at such time we see the plat revised for the conditions in the Findings of Facts, and the requirements of the City Engineer. Shearer: Second Johnson: We have a motion and a second, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #3: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING TO R-4 BY EDWARD A. JOHNSON: Johnson: Any comments at all, Commissioner Hepper? Hepper: No, I have none. Johnson: Mr. Shearer? Shearer: I have none. Johnson: Mr. Alidjani? Alidjani: ON the same changes you made before on item #19. Johnson: I had one other spelling, minor spelling on item #2 on page 2, it should read additional, its about 10 lines down from the top, righthand side of the page. Any other comments? I like this new format of Findings of Fact, where it address the Comprehensive Plan. It's a little more detail I think a better job, more encompassing. Any Discussion? Entertain a motion for approval. DATE: �' MERIDIAN PLANNING /� ZONING AGENDA ITEM NUMBER Z - FU �_�� No MEN! p 147 IFF W 21-1011 AGENCY COMMENTS: MERIDIAN POLICE - MERIDIAN FIRE DEPT. - MERIDIAN CITY ENGINEER - a-utj"w cr MERIDIAN ATTORNEY - MERIDIAN POST OFFICE MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT - tk- MERIDIAN BUILDING DEPT. - ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA STREET NAME COMMITTEE - CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH - NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION - SETTLERS IRRIGATION - IDAHO POWER - US WEST - INTERMOUNTAIN GAS - BUREAU OF RECLAMATION - - 11Q -e odaa-Jw MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY - i MERIDIAN PLANNING DIRECTOR - OTHER COMMENTS: RECEIVED FEB 18 1994 SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET Cjyy ()F. MERIDIAN Proposed Development Name City MERIDIAN formerly VALERI HEIGHTS SUB Date Reviewed 02/03/94 Preliminary Stage XXXXX Final Engineer/Developer Hubble Engr. / Vicki Welker Date Sent The following SUBDIVISION NAME is approved by the Ada County Engineer or his designee per the requirements of the IDAHO STATE CODE. u6T �PP�QD�%� Date not contiguous choose another name X The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA C UNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Meridian City Street Name Ordinance. The following existing street names shall appear on the plat as: "WEST CHERRY LANE" "NORTH TEN MILE ROAD" The following proposed street name is over ten letters in length and cannot be approved unless Ada County Highway District will aproved the length of the street itawc . "WEST VALERI HEIGHTS COURT" The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. 1-11 ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE, Ada County Engineer John Priester Ada Planning Assoc. Terri Raynor Meridian Fire Dept. Representativ DESIGNEES Date Date Date NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed 1! 11 Sub Index Street Index NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS OK \1-01Zz. Z 1 f '} - -' :r •'i�iiii�i�iir��ii�iiiiiiitilii�iiii��`iiiliii '• � "11!111111!11!!!�III��IAII�A�I�II��11�111 ... _ iylii-iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiriiii�lyililiiiiii7lY imiiiiiiifiiiiiiifiifiiifiiifiifliiflifi� ■l�ININi��1�1!I��II�I�t�111II111��1��! _ "tea aiilr�#��]=ai�R>>i7aa7�»T7 a,7�7177#�7#' irylii#7#aia#�ySiJi#7#iyii#a�#��ia#7y71i#��• CCLCti[CCCCCCC�CCtC[CCCCLCCLLCLCCCCCCCCCr �� iwwwwr�r r�rrwwrrrr riwrr�aw�rrrri.ar�w rr� »�� +Na+rN.r+++�N�wtaw*�+M•iRl��**N#.RRM+• ' ttKt�r'�CrcK[i F;R t � �k R� tKKCKRcCtF ��_tR �LRRRR KRI f � EKk�'EFCCCttCCrrkK�FCFFclR:'�CR-*R: R:Ct:FCKKr:KK. �r�aaalariaaaaraa�iraaala•aairrarrari�rrar ,�� kF:�R�.�ri�h lCai;Feic� ictRFiiR � ah'ca arr.a:l.K. _ ci[cC�CRcrc�es•!�t}�tC�:'tktct�cltseCl�{+�{'c![�7c�l�t;•!.'- OFFICIc,LS HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live COUNCIL MEMBERS SIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX NGTON GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer CITY OF MERIDIAN CGTON ROBERTRTD. D. ORRIE BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WALT W. MORROW JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief "BILL" MERIDIANIDAHO 83642 Planner & Zoning Administrator W.L. GORDON, Police Chief , JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. GROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Chairman - Planning & Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian CITY COUNCIL, may we have your answer by: February 9, 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 1/27/94 HEARING DATE: 2/15/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning and Preliminary Plat for Valeri Heights BY: Vickie Welker and Hubble Engineering LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: East of "-e'en Mile Road and North of Pine Avenue JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON,C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER REC CITY PLANNER YOUR MERIIDAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFF.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST (PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUR OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: ErWYMPIUMLI! u t, Planning and Zoning October 12, 1993 Page 9 Heron Lane, and I didn't know it was going to be discussed tonight, but just input, is the city requiring the Highway departments to put in curb and gutter in all these types of situations, because from the semi standpoint that really is, if you're going to have people living there we got to have sidewalks for them to walk on. I just wondered if it was a standard policy or not. Johnson: Well that's not exactly the way we would phrase it, the city doesn't require those things, the Highway District does because they have jurisdiction over all streets and roads. And then the city would normally adopt the ACHD's requirements but not necessarily in each and every instance, is that basically our procedure? Fuller: And then the city takes jurisdiction over that? Johnson: No, the city has no jurisdiction. Shearer: ACHD won't have any jurisdiction either if it's a private road and stays a private road. Fuller: I see that's all I have. Johnson: Anyone else? Anyone else on this application on hearing none and seeing none I'll close the public hearing. What is your pleasure gentlemen? What would like to do? Would you like to do anything? Rountree: Mr. Chairman I make a motion that we have Findings of Fact and Conclusions prepared,and that we see the comments from the Ada County Highway District. Alidjani: I'll second Johnson: Moved and seconded that we have Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law prepared by the City Attorney, and input from ACHD, all in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #2: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING TO R-4 WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION BY VICKI WELKER: Planning and Zoning October 12, 1993 Page 10 Johnson: I'll now open this Public representing the applicant that would address the Commission, please do so a Hearing, is there someone like to come forward and t this time. Matt Munger, 6168 Viewpoint, was sworn by the Attorney. Munger: The first thing I'd like to point out to the members of the Commission is that a revised layout that we have mounted on the board there, I'm not sure as to the copy in front of you. We did revise that, and I believe you got the revised copy. The one that was sent out in the mailer was the original version and didn't show the park lot. The annexation proposed is for 8.57 acres of which we're preliminary platting 6.77 acres, the site is located on the east side of Ten Mile road approximately 1/4 mile south of Cherry lane and east -west boundary the east boundary is the Eight Mile lateral. We are proposing annexation and R-4 zoning for this project. The proposed subdivision contains 21 lots, 16 of which are building lots. The gross density for this project is approximately 2.36 lots per acre, which is in excess of the R-4 zoning. The lots we're proposing range in size from 10,000 square feet to approximately 21,000 square feet, and we're proposing homes in the range of 24,000 square feet and up, which is also well in excess, 2400 square feet I'm sorry,which is also well in excess of the requirements. Access to this subdivision will be off of Ten Mile Road, ACHD in their comments requested sub -streets to the north and to the south. We do not feel this appropriate and the parcel of ground to the north of us is rather small and a sub - street would be a hindrance there. The property to the south of us fronts on both Ten Mile road and Pine Street, so a sub -street there would also be a hindrance. We're proposing a 50 foot right of way inside of the subdivision with 36 foot back to back ad the standard 5 foot sidewalk from Meridian. One of Gary Smith's comments was we were not showing a sidewalk on the park, we don't feel that will be of any real benefit and we'd rather have that as greenspace in the park in which we propose to put a pond and a fountain and a small picnic area. Sewer and water for this project will be extended down Ten Mile road, there approximately 180 feet north of project now, the city has mains installed we will extend those across our frontage and internally to provide services to this side. Fire hydrants and street lights will be determined by the City Engineer, and we'll meet those requirements one we receive them. Irrigation is one of the big items that's come up with our clients dealings with the neighbors, there is an existing irrigation ditch on our south boundary, which our client met with the property owner to Planning and Zoning October 12, 1993 Page 11 the south, we have no problem at this time with tiling that ditch and we do not plan on using that ditch for irrigation on site. We're no proposing for any type of a pressurized irrigation system for this project. The Eight Mile Lateral being our east boundary there, raises some questions as to the size of the fencing or tiling requirements that are normally required for a lateral. We're going to work with the city and Nampa/Meridian Irrigation District on that to try to address any concerns that may arise regarding that lateral. Drainage, we're proposing to retain all the drainage on site from storm water run-off and we're looking at doing that through surface ponding or sub -surface trenches depending on the soil conditions when we go out and run our tests on site. Do you have any questions? I'll be happy to answer them. Johnson: Any questions of Mr. Munger? Rountree: What's the size of the park that you're proposing? Munger: I'm not sure of the square footage on the park, do you happen to know Vicki? Welker: It's at least 10,000 square feet Munger: I believe it's between 12 and 13,000 square feet. Rountree: Do you know the square f ootages on lots 7 and 10, I guess that includes the easement for the Eight Mile Lateral? Munger: I don't know those right off hand, lot 7 and 10. Rountree: You might want to check those because you can't include that easement area in your square footage. Munger: Even without the easement I'm sure we're well above that for R-4. Rountree: The parcel is listed at slightly bigger than what your preliminary plat shows that is being platted where are your other acreages to this parcel? Munger: The other acreage that we have listed in our annexation is to the north of us and the city boundary is there so we have to annex that. Planning and Zoning October 12, 1993 Page 12 Rountree: There is an irrigation ditch, Munger: On our north boundary? Rountree: Yes Munger: Okay, the dealings that we've had have been centered around the south and the Eight Mile Lateral, but we'll have no problem dealing with that one either. Johnson: With respect to Gary's comment #9 he hand wrote in here, "it may be necessary to provide sanitary sewer through this parcel", I believe it's Coe Parker property to the east can't read it very well, did you talk to Gary at all about this particular requirement? Munger: No I haven't. Johnson: Gary has been rather hard to get a hold of here lately, with the move and did you have time to think about it? Munger: The copy of comments that I have doesn't have a #6 or #9, sorry. I have 8 , it was faxed to me this morning. Johnson: Well, he specifically requested he be, Gary Smith, that comment with respect to that. Munger: Providing sewer to the east? Johnson: Yes Munger: I'm sure it's something we can work out. We have room for easements for sewer if that's the Comprehensive Plan to bring that main through our site, then we'd sure participate. Johnson: Anyone else have any questions of Mr. Munger? Our policy with respect to tiling verses fencing is basically that we require tiling and we have never deviated from that since we adopted that rule, you might want to be aware of that. The city hasn't deviated from that point in my knowledge since we adopted that ordinance, is that correct Wayne? Munger: Do you have a size limit on ditches for that requirement? Would that requirement also contain the Eight Mile Lateral, which Planning and Zoning October 12, 1993 Page 13 is substantially large? Johnson: I don't know of any size requirement, do you know of any size requirement? Forrey: Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, and Matt, that's always an issue is how big, the New York Canal, the Riddenbaugh Canal, the Boise River where do you stop? The ordinance says laterals and in Meridian we have some large laterals, and this is certainly one of them, but a black and white reading of the ordinance indicates that this Eight Mile Lateral would have to be tiled. The ordinance is based on safety and does not have a size criteria. So, in the sense of safety it wouldn't, size wouldn't be an issue. Does that help? Johnson: Thank you Wayne. Anyone else have a question for Mr Munger before we go to the public? Okay, thank you, this is a public hearing, anyone else from the public that would like to address the Commission on this application, yes sir. Coe Parker, 2930 W Pine, was sworn by the Attorney. Parker: I'd like to move over to the drawing and show you where I am and show you my concern. I have a easement down this lane, Haven cove is here , my concern is that I don't get land locked here, because I don't have any frontage on any major streets, and I'm not opposed to this development,but I moved out to Meridian to live in the country but it doesn't look like I'm going to get to. I'd just like to address that I have access to city either through Haven cove or through this proposal. Johnson: Do you have anything else to add Mr. Parker? Parker: No Johnson: Any questions for Mr. Parker? Crookston: I just have one, on Gary Smith's comments it said your property is to the east of this development. Parker: I'm on the other side of the lateral. Johnson: Your property lies just to the west of the word proposed, is that right? Planning and Zoning October 12, 1993 Page 14 Parker: My property line goes right along here and about right through here. This is just an easement here, it's about 700 foot. Johnson: Thank you very much. Anyone else from the public like to address the Commission, yes sir. Dave Fuller, 890 Ten Mile, was sworn by the Attorney. Fuller: My concern I've gone over with Vicki quite a bit, on the water and the, excuse me I have a few notes here. First, we talked over how the irrigation was going to be set up and she maybe mentioned a well. Another thing I'd like to talk about here, this is farm ground and I have the property directly south of this proposed subdivision. I got some maps here if you guys want to pass them down. This is the whole corner and her development is just north. Johnson: This whole corner right here? Approximately how many acres are you talking about? Fuller: About 14 acres, and this ditch she's talking about tiling is right here. My question is that is fine to tile that, but for the other people once that's tiled what kind of right of way, is that just buried in someone's backyard or is that how that works? You still don't have a maintenance right of way of any kind there? Once it's covered up that's it? Johnson: There has to be an easement for maintenance, as I under it. We've had some problems in the past, trouble getting access to tiled ditches. And as I recall that has been corrected by the ordinance, Wayne would you like to comment on that? Forrey: Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, the ordinance does require that there be access to the maintenance of, so if you're actively using the water you have to be able to continue to use that water, even though it's tiled ad covered up so we identify with the developer your access points and schedule that type of thing. It gets included in the design. Fuller: My question on this deal is with the, where she was going to put her chain link for the backyard was on this pin line, and as you can see on this right here it goes from ten to eighteen foot on this animal fence line right now which is on the proposed property she is going to develop. How does that, you know if you're going Planning and Zoning October 12, 1993 Page 15 to fence that into someone's backyard how are we going to maintain any kind of service area there? Go through each one of these peoples backyard when they divide fences off? Forrey: Probably relocate it and that's a detail to work with Hubble Engineers, you know through good engineering design I think get that point where you can get access and still service the ditch and respect all the new neighbors you've got along there. Johnson: This has to be worked out, in order to Fuller: I just didn't know whether you went with a 15 foot easement you move the fence back so it was uncovered in the backyard, if you get someone in there with a broke pipe, you got to dig it up they don't want you going through these fancy homes to the backyard to dig this up. Johnson: And that's what we're trying to avoid. Fuller: My next thing I'd like to address is right here, this comes in like this, this is going to be developed to, and I've already talked to maybe selling to some developers on this and connecting on to it. And I was concerned about the sewer, whether it was coming through the field or down Ten Mile and you know how it was going to connect, because this is going to develop fairly soon in the next few years, part of it or all of it. Johnson: I don't know if Gary has a comment here about where the sewer coming. Rountree: Coming down Ten Mile Johnson: Ten Mile, Fuller: And then the other thing I'd like to address is the proposed long term R-4 but there is a lot of light commercial coming down Pine Street, and I may talk to Vicki, and talk to her about it she wants real fancy homes which is good but I had thoughts of storage buildings, neighborhood storage, because this area is growing up so fast. And she said those two weren't compatible, so if they're not compatible we need to. I'm concerned about what kind of development we're going to go with. Johnson: Well it's a basic procedure we operate on, on the basis Planning and Zoning October 12, 1993 Page 16 of chronology, who gets the applications in, at this time we're talking about maybe heresay on storage buildings and yeah it might pose a problem, cause they're not always compatible with residential down the road, right now we're looking at an application for residential development and that's what we're addressing. Fuller: I'm just talking about Pine as a Future, there is a lot of small businesses. Johnson: There has been quite a few of different plans proposed on Pine Street, some of which most of which haven't gone through, you're right is this designated a mixed use area? So the chances of it being developed commercially there are pretty slim. In the Comprehensive plan that is not a mixed use area which means that area is theoretically being held for residential development. Fuller: I want to go back to my notes here, about, we also discussed with Vicki about the neighbors and them being notified that when they purchase this that there will be farming activities there, I run a small custom farming operation with equipment in and out. And we do still work jobs and we do do a lot of farming at night after hours, dark, you're familiar with the situation that happened in our neighboring counties. So these are some things that I'd like to see addressed in the proposal plans of whatever you're going to do with that ground adjoining to it. That's all I have. Johnson: Thank you, we appreciate it, your testimony is part of the record. Anyone else like to come forward and address the Commission? Seeing no one then I'll close the Public Hearing. Any discussion gentleman? What's your pleasure? Rountree: Mr. Chairman I make a motion that we have Findings of Fact and Conclusions prepared. Shearer: Second Johnson: I have a motion for Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law prepared by the City Attorney, all in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #3: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HUNTS DATE: MERIDIAN PLANNING ZONING AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2 APPLICANT: {i I �/� a e` /z e LG � ls.2ti� fk r�J �j y'Zp'!26 REQUEST- AGENCY EQUEST AGENCY COMMENTS: MERIDIAN POLICE - «reviC60ea MERIDIAN FIRE DEPT. -.see at�d Commen-� MERIDIAN CITY ENGINEER - MERIDIAN ATTORNEY - MERIDIAN POST OFFICE - - MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT - 5-ee G,Hc,,Jed MERIDIAN BUILDING DEPT. - ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT - ADA STREET NAME COMMITTEE - CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH - LL NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION - SETTLERS IRRIGATION --1 J IDAHO POWER - jo?,e eZaa hed US WEST - INTERMOUNTAIN GAS - BUREAU OF RECLAMATION - MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY - MERIDIAN PLANNING DIRECTOR - OTHER COMMENTS: COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERT GIESLER MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning & Plannin{ JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Za.�'�ne C111SSt�t-, may we have your answer by: TRANSMITTAL_ DATE 2,q -DO�3 .HEARING DATE: (QQJt /Za �Q�3 REQUEST:q 'FU R` t �(N1/M4 a� Cot(" Valera E-tcS i+/ision.. BY: tci Li�ltlk2l' LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: AW \�� t 7W, 9 11,41 JIM JOHNSON P/Z MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C 608 CORRIE, C/C BOB GIESLER, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT, JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT, BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CQ. -(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) U:S WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) CITY FILES OTHER: HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live JA ICE S. GA S, Treasurer urCP, City Clerk JANICE LASS, Treasurer CITY O F MERIDIAN BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR.. Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS. Fire Chief MERIDIAN , IDAHO 83642 BILL GORDON. Police Chief Phone (208) 888-4433 GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERT GIESLER MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE Chairman Zoning & Plannin{ JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Za.�'�ne C111SSt�t-, may we have your answer by: TRANSMITTAL_ DATE 2,q -DO�3 .HEARING DATE: (QQJt /Za �Q�3 REQUEST:q 'FU R` t �(N1/M4 a� Cot(" Valera E-tcS i+/ision.. BY: tci Li�ltlk2l' LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: AW \�� t 7W, 9 11,41 JIM JOHNSON P/Z MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C 608 CORRIE, C/C BOB GIESLER, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT, JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT, BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CQ. -(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) U:S WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS) CITY FILES OTHER: