The URL can be used to link to this page

Sundance Subdivision PP 00-020~,...~ ~L~TY CLERK FILE CHECKLIST' Project Name: Sundance Subdivision File No. Contact Name: _ ~ ~ phone: Date Received from Planning and Zoning Department: Planning and Zoning Level: 0 Transmittals to agencies and others: © Notice to newspaper with publish dates: ^ Certifieds to property owners: PP 00-020 344~,Z~p ~~'-~ ffOSr< Sep#ember 27, 2000 Hearing Date: November 14, 2000 UC-~- ~7 and Nav- lU ^ Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: I x~l Approve n Denv Notes: City Council Level: ^/ Transmittals to agencies and others: ©' ,Notice to newspaper with publish dates ~~ Certifieds to property owners: ^ City Council Action: Hearing Date: ~~~~~C ~ ~' t r! ~~'L- ~-- C 1 and ~ll~'lG-~ -~SIOI ^ Approve ^ Deny ^ Findings /Conclusions /Order received from attorney on: Findings /Conclusions /Order . ResokRions: Orginal Res I Copy Cert MinNebook ^ Approved by Council: ~apy Res,Capy CeR: City Clerk City Engineer Ci Pl Copies Disbursed: ry anner c;ryAnemey Findings Recorded Sterkng Codifiers Project File Copy Res ! Orgirml GeR: Development Agreement: Atla Coumy (CPAs) AppkcaM (non•CPPs} ^ Sent for S~gnature$: Recorded Ordinances: Original: Minutetmok Copies to: City Clerk State T C ^ Signed by all parties: ax omm. Sate Treasarer, Auditor, sass°, ^ Approved by Council: Sterkng aedifiars City Anorney ^ Recorded: Ciry Engineer Cily Planner Prefect fib ^ Copies Disbursed: Appkcam (it eppL) Fsrdkrgs, orders: Original: Minutetrook Ordinance No. Resolution No. Copies to: App4cam Project file City Engineer ^ Approved by Council: Ciry Planner ^ Recorded: Deadline: 10 days Ciry Attorney " Reeved Vacation Fkrdmgs Recorded Devebpment Agreements: OrginaCFireprooi File Published in news a er: ^ ~°°`e5 t°:"'°"eant p p Project file Copies Disbursed: City Engineer City Planner Notes: ~dy AtFerney MAYOR /""• •-. HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY Robert D. Corrie A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIA LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288 2499 • Fax 288-2501 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS N PUBLIC WoRKs Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) s87-2211 • Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, city clerk, by: November 7, 2000 Transmittal Date: October 5, 2000 Hearing Date: November 14, 2000 File No.: PP 00-020 Request: Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 214 single-family lots, 4 future office lots, 23 common lots and 3 other lots on 69.79 acres for proposed Sundance Subdivision By: G.L. Voigt Development Location of Property or Project: northeast corner of Ustick and Meridian Roads Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Your Concise Remarks: Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 ~- ~ R JEST FOR SUBDIVISION APPRC .L PRELIMINARY PLAT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~~~~'~ TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSION• A request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerks possession no later than three days following the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month that the request was made. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:00 P.M., Thursday following the Planning and Zoning Commission action. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Aiulexation and Subdivision: Sundance Subdivision 2. General Location: S W '/4 Section 31 T 4N R 1 E (Northeast corner Ustick & Meridian Roads) 3. Owners of record: McBirney Property Trust (Bob McBirney) Address: 1162 Bentoak Lane, San Jose CA ,Zip 95129 Telephone X408) 446-3759 4. Applicant: G. L. Voi~t Development Address: 1908 E. Jennie Lee Dr., Idaho Falls ID Zip 83404 Telephone (208) 524-6000 5. Engineer, Kathy Stroschein, P. E. Firm Bri~RS En ineering Inc Address, 1800 W. Overland Road, Boise ID Zip 83705 Telephone 344-9700 6. Name and address to receive City billings - Name: G. L. Voigt Development Address 1908 E. Jennie Lee Dr., Idaho Falls ID 83404 Telephone 524-6000 PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres: 69.79 2. Number of building lots: (214) Single Family Lots, (4) Future Office Lots & (23) Common 3. Number of other lots: 3.43 Lots 4. Gross density per acre: 3.15 5. Net density per acre: 4.58 6. Zoning Classification(s): _Existing: RT, Proposed: R-8 7. If the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridian City Limits but w~'t~hin the jurisdictional mile, what is the existing zoning classification? RT (Rural TransYtion) 8. Does the plat border a potential green belt? No 9. have recreational easements been provided for`' No 10. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City? Yes Explain Private 2.52 acre pocket park 11. Are there proposed dedications of common areas? No Explain ,~ . For future parks? Explain 0205\SUBAPPL MER PP.form (1) .-~ 12. What school(s) seiti the area? Linder Elementary Meridia, ~iddle & High, do you propose any agreements for future school sites? No ,Explain 13. Are there any other proposed amenities to the City? Pocket Park ,Explain Water Supply -Central Fire Hydrants 14. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial or combination): Residential 15. Type of Dwelling(s) (Single Family, Duplexes, Multiplexes, other):. Single Family 16. Proposed Development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot(s): 6533 b. Minimum square footage of structure(s): 1301 c. Are garages provided for? Yes Square footage: 400 d. Has landscaping been provided for Yes ,Describe 30 foot landsca e lot adjacent to Meridic & Ustick Roads, 20 feet landscape buffer adioinin~ the two collector roadways & a ~ 52 ac pocket par e. Will trees be provided for? Yes, Will trees be maintained ? Sundance Homeowners Assoc. f. Are sprinkler systems provided for? _ Yes, by the Developer g. Are there multiple units ? No Type: Remarks: h. Are there special set back requirements ? No Explain: i. Has off street parking been provided for ? Yes Explain: Garages and Driveways j. Value range of property: NA k. Type of financing for development: Conventional 1. Were protective covenants submitted? Yes ,Date: 8/31/00 17. Does the proposal land lock other property? No Does it create Enclaves? No STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be constructed to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. 2. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 3. Development will connect to City services. 4. Development will comply with City Ordinances. 5. Preliminary Plat will include all appropriate easements. 6. Street names must not conflict with City grid system. 9-604 B PRE-APPLICATION MEETING The developer shall meet with the Administrator prior to the submission of the Preliminary Development Plan. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss early and informally the purpose and effects of this Ordinance and the criteria and standards contained herein, and to familiarize the developer with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and such other plans and ordinances as deemed appropriate. The developer may also meet with the Commission or Council prior to submitting an application. 0205\SUBAPPL MER PP.form {2) .. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION 1. The proposed streets. will be constructed to Ada County Highway District and City of Meridian standards. (Construction Standards: 36 ft. street section and 5 ft. sidewalks.) 2. The proposed development is in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. This area is designated as Single Family Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Map. 3. The development will connect to City water and sewer facilities. The White Drain sewer trunkline will service this parcel. However, the sewer trunk is not available at this time. The developer understands that the City has no scheduled time frame for extension of the proposed sewer trunk. A water main is available in Ustick Road. 4. The applicant is requesting an R-8 zoning designation and preliminary plat approval. The proposed lots meet or exceed the minimum dimensional standards of the R-8 zone. The smallest lot is 6533 sf, however, most lots 7,000 sf and above. The median lot size in the development is 8718 sf (excluding lots 45, 47, 49 & 50; block 7). All homes will meet or exceed the minimum house square footage of 1301. Stub streets have been provided, however, some block lengths may exceed the maximum of 1,000 feet. Block 10 appears to exceed the threshold. so we have provided a pedestrian pathway (lot 18, block 10) for improved connectivity. 5. The development plan reflects existing easements for the Finch Sub-Drain which is under Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District jurisdiction. 6. The proposed street names have been submitted to the Street Name Committee for their review. 7. The development consists of 241 total lots. (214) single family residential lots, (23) common lots and (4) future office lots. The subject property is 69.79 acres and the proposed density is 3.14 dwellings per acre. The lot sizes vary from 6,533 to 16,978 square feet. The median lot size is 8,718 sf, excluding the four future office lots. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION The plan includes four future office lots adjacent to the Ustick and Meridian Road intersection. Both Ustick and Meridian Road are designated as minor arterials. In the future this intersection will carry high volumes of traffic and will be signalized. This would not be conducive to single family residences. Therefore, from a planning perspective, a more intensive use would be warranted. The four lots would share access points with two of the approaches restricted to right-in-right-out. The applicant understands that a rezone to LO will be required for the office use. A rezone is not possible at this time since the existing Comprehensive Plan would not support such an application. After the new Comprehensive Plan is adopted, the applicant will submit for LO rezone. The project has incorporated a large pocket park consisting of 2.52 acres. The developer intends to landscape the area. The large size of the park will allow it to function as both park and storm drainage retention area. The total landscape area proposed in the development is 7.79 acres. This generous amount of landscaping will provide a aesthetically pleasing atmosphere. This project reflects the new standards proposed in the Landscape Ordinance. Two collector roadways have been incorporated for smooth vehicular access. Landscaping will be installed along the collectors (20 feet) and arterials (30 feet). 8. A traffic study has been submitted with the application. The study will be delivered to ACPID for their review. 9. A variance application will be submitted for Council review if staff determines the block length of block 10 exceeds the 1,000 feet. A pedestrian pathway has been provided to shorten the walking distance. ... RT RT N RT 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet RT RT T RT /~ ~ -L 1` ~1V L O ~ RT MERIDIAN CITY LIMITS RT R, BOUNDARY ® «3 USTIC K ROAD o p R4 R1 R RT Ri ~T1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ITTI ~~--~~----~~--~~LL~~ RT R m ~~~~~, Rd 1 .....1 e Rd0 o ~~ ~ ~ ; ¢p -~_ hi - ---- Ri Rd ~ _L' - - - - - - - _ -- =- RT -- ---- R - R-1 BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. NE BRIGGS INC. ~20s> 34¢9700 1/2 MILE VICINITY MAP SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 31, T.4N., R.lE., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO REVISION HEET 10F1 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD BOISE, IDAHO 83705 DESIGN DRAFT SCALE DATE BKB 1" = 1000' 08/29/00 DWG. NO. 0205 \0205.APR ,-. ~: ~Q g~~ ~ ~ . . I ,~ ry .y X • / J ~ ~ 15 r ,h' . w i ~ - ~, s l v m , ~ - iz ~ 4, y s I f~~ ~ I ga x I ~ ~l \ i ~w~ ",w~ ^ I / l~ . • r o w' w ~ I` i a ^ ~r w atl • R _ _ ~ ~ p p i ~! ~! i.s !3 6. ~' a ° ,w 9 a ,M tf. w ' '.'~ I ~`= ~ r s. . s ~ _ / ,~ yrg_ ~ ~r a - -~ = 'r ~ " , - ~ss..t', _- _ ~ s "mac w a ? ar ~ ~ I ~ a it to ` " ~ P~ 4 ~ ~" i ~ ( I r r I / ~ ~ _ 4 Y ~~- ~~ ~ w ~,~ ~ I~ ~~ // _ ~~ 'rr i6 p` p,, • ~~q, / T ~" ~~ q _ w ~_ 0 ~a h ~ ~ E f:. . ~ :- .w ,n. ^Ta~~ tl~ ~ ,, y a o~ _ I ~3. 3~ aa'z1. - 15 4 a 4 ~ ~ ~<- ~•.. I l '' .; '~~ a na a ~r t~ a ~ ,. _ 3~. _ ,. G! S y ~r + ".. '9. 4 " ro r~' 6 ; - 8_ _. 9. - 9 9r ~.~ I a ,. ~ r a @. ; 3r ~ a .. _ it r /~ " Y ~r - Y g ( d I g -.r a~rS ~ra~: ~.r, _" ~ I rwarrsr n ,~ e ,. - ~f ~ ~jr~j~ yrr~ ~ '4t'+z=~_9a ., 3e'ir ~ v `~y yr-_L.-- A -~-". i / ~ \ / - - / ~~~Crn ~ _ ,'~r~--inn ~~ ~ ~~ ` _ _ _ - _ - ~ \ __. ~' -- ~ '-/ ~ ~ ~\ r ,, -- r ~~ ~ 3 ~ I~ e I ~ ~ t ~-*.~+-~Z -QT - - iii I ~ I3 ~ ~~~, ~ I I I I ~ ~ g I , t ~ 1 ' ~ i I ~ ppP~~FF~~lt~~~f'r~F~~q! tf ` F ~..~ M a I( F F~f F !F ~F . SS k ~~i F~ i~t G ~~ ~ R ~ ~~~- s~ A - p~ppt~t ~gE~ ~ ~ ~ y ! F ~ 6y I ~ K ~ 7 ~ .. ~ ~H6 6 [I = ~ ~ e ~} ~ ~ i ~ r , ~'."~~~ ~~ ~F ®® i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~@ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~~ p i~ ~ i ~~ ~ i~§ ~ _ A a m OE9CiPi OPLY NOT M'PAOV® FOR CONS1g1 CTOP~ OiOF: 07/31/00 3UNDANCE SUBDIVISION '"1°°' °•~•, "0. °~ - '"~ :.°:d,' ems"" ~T1 q w,.. w...u,. _ rwe.rrwwr nwr Wl~N rrt .~ µ~~t ial .-. ~W a ~Q m 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 3 4 5 6 1 2 8 9 B OCI 1 B OC < 5 10 7 12 W. HELENA STREET 29 11 11 '< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ~ 1 30 12 28 LO K 4 g 10 23 22 21 20 19 1 g 17 16 15 14 13 ~ 2 3 27 Z 4 26 13 8 W. KALISPEL STREET 5 25 w. ~~~ STREET 7 6 5 4 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ~ 6 24 48 BL C 1 B O K2 3` 23 2 7ro 47 14 13 12 11 B K 6 W. GREAT FALLS ST. ~ 1 16 15 8 UO 22 46 17 Z 21 9 m 45 g 8 7 2 18 OCK 7 3 2 1 10 20 440 _ 11 5 4 3 5 11 19 43 ~ U 6 ~, ~ 6 12 18 42 - m ----- -- - ~:el~ ~0 11 12.\ 7 13 41 \ BLOC 9 ---- -- 1 9 RT 40 $ 14 7 O 8 14 15 16 1 a G 2 g 39 15 3 W. SMOKEV HRL DRNE 4 5 16 ~ 6 30 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 38 z ° B OC 10 36 37 ACRES 18 23 29 24 23 22 21 20 19 17 16 25 19 20 21 22 24 Z a 28 15 W. WILD HORSE DRNE 25 26 4 27 3 2 5 g 7 8 14 B y 1 OC< 11 g 13 49 47 ~ 37 36 35 34 33 ~ 15 14 13 12 11 10 12 Z BLOCK 7 W-WO LF PO INT CT. w. wolf P OINT D R. 11 50 45 38 39 41 42 43 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 BL CI 10 USTICK ROAD N p K I S ~(~,G RT p C ll R ~ Bo-v - E DGA R ST . SSER S R F MS _ ~ MERIDIAN CITY LIMI S O O 300 D 300 600 Fe t _ ADDESON ST. ~ _ BRIGGS ENGINEERING INC. 1" = 300' VICINITY MAP , REVISION ~~~~~' SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION BRIGGS ANC PORTION OF THE SW I/4 OF SECTION 31, T.4N., R.lE., B.M., ~zos~ 3aa-s7oo ADA COUNTY, IDAHO SHEET t OF ~ 1800 W.OVERLAND ROAD DESIGN DRAFT SCALE DATE DWG. NO. BOISE, IDAHO 83705 BKB 1" = 300' 08/29/00 0205 \0205.APR .-~~ DESCRIPTION FOR SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION August 30, 2000 A parcel of land located in the SW'/4 of Section 31, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southwest comer of the SW'/ of Section 31, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian; thence N 00°50'16" E 45.00 feet along the west line of said SW'/. to a point; thence S 89°35'39" E 25.00 feet to a point on the east right-of-way line of Meridian Road, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; Thence N 00°50'16" E 1874.33 feet along said east right-of-way line to a point; Thence S 89°35'39" E 1605.04 feet to a point; Thence S 00°50'16" W 1894.33 feet to a point on the north right-of-way line of Ustick Road; Thence N 89°35'39" W 1585.04 feet along said north right-of-way line to a point; Thence N 44°22'41" W 28.18 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description, said parcel comprising 69.79 acres, more or less. Michael E. Marks, PLS 4998 0205/0205. subd. des. doc ~0 13: a1 a68aa63759 7_ ~'~ QO 1 1 : ~~a ti~~_^r~_xjua~.. iN;a2: BRIGG? ftJGltiE~P.trn,. lydC. tZ~6345295(i P.07; taectress~ ~i~ .~~ /a~_ ~ _1 Heing !'rrat d~{y sworn ~~n (state) oath, depose srx! say ', '~!'±at t idrn tt-e record owner andior repr~sentat~va pf the praparty {fagCfit~~ nn the ~tsa>hieeti. and 1 grant my permission to 1 a~tt'~nd submit the accompanying appUcation partaiNng td that t?rQP~~Y ~1~ ifl litdemri{ty, defena and hCtld the City of Mer~diar+ and ft's employees harmless any dalm ar 1iatHfity resulting from any Qis~tte ag tQ the $t~tsrnrettts canhAttled heteet 'br aa'. tt~e owrt8rship of the propr3rty +rrhiCh is ties subj~t 4i (h~ applibetian. ids __,„_._d~Y of ,~~~..~-~-~_.~-- - _.._..~ 2p00 "" (3ignature) ~ ',~tigS~RiBEQ A~14 swORN t ore me thfl day ono ysa - rs~ a wrrtip~~• ,: r ~~ ~~ } , ®Fa~ "„~~ F~r~~g ~ tery public fo~aha ~~'~°~ ~ ~~ ~ esldlnq at _,l~'2~ ~~,.~' ~p1Jly Commission ExptirE&:l~~ ~ ~; - .~ ~ s ,~':' A ~ K `~, t r~ ~ ,,~• ~~~~ ,;n ~ :GS Y "~ f~~ 1~~i ~' SOS JACKIE MC'.SIR.NEY PAGE ^02 ^ ~., ~-•, ~~ C~ - FA-134697/MLC. ; Your No. MCBIRNEY/VOIGT SCHEDULE A CONTINUED 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the State of Idaho, County of Ada, and is described as follows: A parcel of real property being a part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 31, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of Section 31, Township 4 North, Range 1 East of Boise Meridian; running thence North 89°58' East, 24.908 chains to a point on the South line of said Section 31; thence North 29.08 chains to a point; thence South 89°58' West, 24.918 chains to the West line of said Section 31; thence South 29.08 chains to a Place of Beginning; being a part of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 31, Township 4 North, Range 1 ~ East of Boise Meridian. ESCEPTING: That portion previously conveyed to the Ada County Highway District by Deed recorded as Instrument No. 8135880, records of Ada County, Idaho, such parcel described as follows: A triangular parcel of land for public right of way located in the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 31, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 31, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian; thence East along the Section line common to Section 6, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, and Section 31, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, a distance of 45.00 feet to a point; thence North, a distance of 25.00 feet to a point, said POINT BEING THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence West along the Northerly right of way line of IIstick Road, a distance of 20.00 feet to a point; thence North along the Easterly right of way line of North Meridian Road, a distance of 20.00 feet to a point; thence Southeasterly, a distance of 28.28 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. AND FIIRTHER EBCEPTING therefrom any portion lying within Meridian Road and IIstick Road. ~_ , 2 !`~ ~, I'SCHEDIILS B - Section i REQIIIREMENTS The follooring requirements must be met: (a) Pay the agreed amounts for the interest in the land and/or the Mortgage to be insured. (b) Pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the Policy. (and and or the Mortgage cto betinsuredeaustgbehsignedredelivered 1 / and recorded. (d) You must give the folloo-inq information: i. Release(s) or Reconveyance(s) of item(s) AS MEETS INSIIRED~S REOIIIREMENTB._ 2. We will require a copy of the trust agreement and any amendments to the MCBIRNEY PROPERTY TRIIST Agreement, for our approval before title; insurance can be issued. (e) We require Seller or Borrowers Affidavit provided and approved prior to recording. } ~~. ,. ~ , '`x Fay - ~ .~ 3 ~ ~ SCHEDULE B - Section 2 EXCEPTIONS Any Policy we issue will have the following exceptions unless they are taken care of to our satisfaction. PART I: 1, Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2, Any facts, rights, interest, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3, Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4, Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. 5, (a) Unpatented"mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the public records. g, Any liens, or rights to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. NOTE: The foregoing numbered exceptions (1-6) may be eliminated in an ALTA Extended or EAGL$ Coverage Policy. tV .,__ 7 t'} : x' _ continued 4 n SCHEDULE B CONTINUED 7. General and Special Taxes for the year 2000, an accruing lien not due or payable until the fourth Monday in November 2000 when the bills are issued, the first half of which is not delinquent until after December 20, 2000. 8. Except mineral or water rights, claims or title to mineral or water. 9. Liens, levies and assessments of the NAMPA MERIDIAN Irrigation District, and the rights, powers and easements of said District as by law provided. 10. Any affect of Record of Survey No. 4556, recorded MARCH 10, 1999, as Instrument No. 99025521, Official Records. 11. Subject to any claims arising from question of gaps or overlaps between the legal description of the herein described property and those of surrounding parcels. 12. Any off-record facts, encumbrances, easements or possessory claims, a survey or inspection would disclose. END SCHEDULE B NOTE: SEE SCHEDULE B -SECTION 1~RE~UIREMENT INFORMATIONAL NOTES: NOTE: General taxes for 1999, in the original amount of $1,275.80, Code Area 242, A. P. No. S0531336210, have been paid in full. NOTE: Pursuant to the State of Idaho insurance regulation: A cancellation fee will be charged on all cancelled orders, unless notified to the contrary, all orders shall be cancelled and a billing sent within 6 months of the effective date on the commitment. NOTE: If you have questions regarding this commitment please contact: MAY LIN CARLSEN, Title Officer, at FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF IDAHO, INC. 7311 Potomac Drive, Boise, Idaho 83704, or call (208) 375-0700 or 1-800-321-7311. continued 5 __ ~ - _ ~ _ .. ; , i j;: - 853062 = , ~ ~- ,... ... GRANT'DEEb - - .. ,,: i FOR VI:L,JE ^RECEIVED, W^ ^P.OBERT McF~IR*IF.Y,c JR. , _ 1162 Bent Oa Y, ~-. y ~ ~ t J i _ ; STATE of c-A~,~or-N,.t } ,, - _ ~ ..SS, _ County of 'iA1.r1,~ G~Rr'.1 ) .; , .r ,, , - - - - ~ ,~ On this 1 ~r,I _~ day of ~cyj , 19f35, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in anj for said State, personally appeared JACQUELINE McLiIRNEY, kn~tan to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument and ac'r.nowledged to me that she executed the same. IN WITNESS"WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed ^ry official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. ~~e.,~ ^rlc -~,~ r=t ~..:~~.~ NO ry Public for Cffr-~.'t;!,U.A -~~, OFFtC LPL ~i: 1r f~; `Residing at ~nl Z5c: c.-f_,hrr.:,q _ / _.41 r ~ NCf?° PT C :IrTi b7 commission ex ires:•~.,., c ~~ h.~ c~nn. e:,, re. ;U7 •7, 1927 .^ ,..:, ~~..~~^ ' STATE OF G:?~~Fc".~1~~1 _ ) _ r.-: , ss. _ County of ~~i1H~a GL.diL~ ) On this ,~~~•/ day of rJ~3/1C)f 1985, before me, the undersicne:d, a Nc,tar~ Public in and for :,did State, personally ap?eared b;F,LIA KA':HLEF,N !SoIIIP.NEY, known to me Eo he the person ~:hos_ narr:e is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument and ac}:no~,:ledged '.~ me that she e::ecuted the. same. I'; ..: "~;~,;,~ 6lri~.iv;OF, I have hereunto set my hand and affix,;d ~' Offi~..:~ .:gal the da y a.~d year in this certificate first above ~ C 2 t t C rl , - s_. K . _. _ ---- .- - -N-o~<,ry Public for ~~~,F:,2,~,~ .~.[, ;; ', 'siding at ~i'IN T`•C ~~~i;-i~'N A. ti,: _ . _ . t hty commission expires JvN :,•:,,,y ~.~ k •~''\ .~ • - STATE OF ./~ ~;FeI_'a/l A ) / SS. _ County of ~/lu>a G'c.Y~1 } On th1S G7r/_ day Of ~/~h-C1-~ l~~~r %~'~G_°_ ff:C, _':~ undersigned, a N~tar}' Public in any nor Scid Sta~~, _ =~~G ;a~ i_/ appeared MAID hP.~:L•' Mc BIRN'cY, known to -:~ -~ ~e ~:~e Ys, name i.s subscribed to the withir, and fGreci-; ir.strume a` ar.d acF:nowledged to m~ that she ezec~~ted t~,e sa-._. It: Z•;:,T:dESS ISiii:R::OF, Z have ;: _ _ e~.... `o ._.~ _ ....r.r. ~ - = " ~ ; mti• nff1C131 Seal thr? oay dnd yea>. ?n t;1.. __--1-1G:~_ ..2 ~,,--i:• - _ c'.O'• _ -.. - _ _~ . .... ~ T% r1~1 ~r~... .. ...,_. ~ ~Gt ~L'y ~^ :~ ~_ _G. Li'r iYCi r., ii .. /,i.. t`: •,~~` __ h' icE•S ld: nC .: _ l r{/: J'L.'~c C/' c- ~~,<.~, ry .. ~-- :; ._ .... ~ i•1y cGr-~:-;;isaion er:~,i__~:~ ;u ->~ ;•i~•' ,~ `~ ~ % ~ .•:y urn' a _.~ '9E. i a i .~ 1 r~. • _ ,+ A parcel of real property berg a part of t:.e South;:est Quarter of Section 31, Township 4 forth, Pange 1 East, Boise 14cridian, Ada County, Idaho, des~ribect as .ollows: Co:r~~nencing at the Southwest co_::er o= 3ectior: 31 To~mship 4 north, Range 1 East of Bolse _:er_c_~;:; running thence iVorth 89°5o""'.East 24.908 chains o a point on S:sth line o? said Section ."sl; thence "port. 29.G8 gains to point; thence South 89°58' [lest ?4.9h8 c::^.~i~s to 'v:est line of said Section 31; thence South. 29.03 chains to ~ place o~ beginning• being a part of th(z SoLth;:est Qua-.er o_ said Section 31 , Township ~~ :,orth, Rage 1 East o: seise `'eridi aa, containing 72 1/2 acres mere •~r less. E4CEP'f That portion pre~•irnlsl.y conve•:ed to toe .-..~ Cou~~_-: Highway District by deed recurued as ~r:st_,.-en_ ::o. O'_350oS0, records of Ada COlli]ty, Idaho, such place'. .._.,~__~~~ as: A triangular i~arcel of land for public __~^_-o.-::ay located in the Southwest Quarter o;_ the Scu~^•.:es= G~.:art~a o= Section 31, Township 4 north, Range 1 East, ~ ise :•:er•:c_<_~, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly desc:iirc~ as `olrcx;: Commencing at the Southwest corner of ti:e Soutnues~ Quarter of-the Southwest Quarter of Section 31, T.=;\., R. ]. F.. , B..1. ; Thence Ea::t along the _ection L.ir,r_ c~ta~on to Section c, 'C. 3N. R.lE. , and Section 31., 'f.4iV. , R.lE. a distance oL ~~5.00 ~ feet to a point ; Thencr_ tdurth, n di.sC:m~~~~ or Z` .00 iee'. to a point, said point being the Rh::11; PO[N'1' OI' T>1•:C;IN~I1G; 'thence l.1(e:>t al<~ng chc Norttlerl~ rigi:t-of-•.;av line of Ustick Roa(1, ;t (1 i. ;:trince of 20.00 Legit to a point; ThenCC n(??'C11 alUll~ the E:rtiterlV ilgnC-Oi:-w~?V lll'~@. Of i•Joac.h ~t~riJi.nn li~u(d, a uisrance of 20.OG ;^eet to ;1 point; 1'hunce Suuth(:rlsterly, a 'istanc~ a 23.25 iect to the kF.AL I'vIiti'f f)1' I;I•:GTiJi~Ii~G. Alta CJUnty. ~~3.J, %. . R~ue,t M n F.::hi.hit e1: to Grant Deed T''~'t 1 ' 5 a' tip: D.1~F - ~ L - 8S J ' +pc?.DA '*tO E R WeG~'Y ~. °_c - .~ r-~ ~rot~>?njnng TFoS Sift ' -- ASSOCIA~'ED EAR'TA SCIENCES l<111C. lltoLbGY • GLOLOCY - >jN~lP1!?F.RING 'Spit, bIURVEYB - SOiI. AND WATHR Qefwt.liY ' R~.70tA1CE. l'LAIVIYIWG AND 817'L INV~,STIGATIe)Ntf 621f $ amr Drlve ~~. Ids ~?0! 612-w11~ July 21, 2000 Attn: Vend Wartman G,L. Voigt Development 2450 S. Five Mile Noise,lD 83709 Dear Vem: This report pertains to the three soil teat holes that we e=xcavated and described on the McBirney property in a part of the SW of section 31, T.4N., R.]E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. The soil characteristics and internal drainage conditions were noted and .logged on the attached field shoat. The purpose of this preliminary soil investigation was to determine suitability for building requirements including placement of footinbs, excavating crawl spaces, designing storm drain facilities, and potential for basements. Free water (water table) was found in all three test holes at depths of l0i" (THl), 8l" (TH2) and 123" (TH3). Monitoring wells (PVC pipes) were installed in each of the feet holes sQ that water table deeptha can be measured and recorded. W star table measurements should betaken at two-week intervals from August 1. though Qctober 1 S, 2000. I would anticipate the water table levels to rise until about the third week in August arld then lower when irrigation alerts to slow down. When water is shut out of the cattals (about Qctober 1 ") I would expect the water tables to drop rapidly. I have estimated soil permeability for each soil layer identified (see attached field sheet). The soil permeabilities were estimated on the basis of soil texture, soil structure, density (porosity), and other characteristics of the horizon in the soil profile. Commonly, the percolation rate of a soil is set by the feast permeable horizon (layer) in fhe soil profile. Monitoring fife three test holes for water table for maximum he;ig?It and duration will give a basis for the type and design of storm drain facility needed. Soil texture, structure, density, clay content, etc., also should be considered in the design. If you have any questions about this t~eport, please call me at (208) 672-9213. Sincerely, Gten H. Logan Certified Professional Soil Scientist i 'd 0S9T-9L~-80Z-i Xdd S3S I21dJ31N3 I'13 ip =8 00 ~ 82 ' I of Evaluation Date 9 2440 J Requested By Vern Wartman for G L Voigt Development Address S _ >: iv e City Noise State mho Zip Code $370.9 Phone (248) 890-8818 Lot Size - Bedrooms - Parcel Legal Description 11cBirnev Drol7erty in mart of SW of Section 31~ T 4N. B M A Count I SlODQ 0-I~ t'val i~a~tart n„ rsl ~., v r ....~_, nne~e. Pit TH1 Pit TH2 Pit TFf3 0-13° Silt loam (20% clay), 0-11" Silty clay bam 0-10" Stit farm (2096 clay), 1 OYR 314, many fine (309° clay), ] OYR t OYR 4/4, common std few medium 3/6, nsany frae fine roots, etzdrtnted 1~TS, eatttttated Tpttt9, cahmsted pumWblltty 2"/hr. ptameabtlrty 2"/hi. pertneabtlity .5- 1 "/Itr. 10-21 " Silty clay loom (30%r+~ 13-28" Silt loam (1 S°~6 cLy), clay), 1 OYR 4J4, few lOYR 3/4, few fine 11-17" Silty clay loam fine roots, estimaued roots, estimated (30%+ clay), .1 OYR permeability .2-.5"/lu. permeability 2"Ihr. 4/6, common fine roots, estimated 21-30" Weakly cemented 18-46" Sih loam (l 59f, clay), permeability .2- very fine Bandy loam lOYR 3/6, fcw Stu .5"/hr. (5-1096 clay), lOYR roots, estimated 516, nn mats, pet ability 2"/hr. 17-32" Moden6ely estimated perrtteability ccrrrented hardpan, .02-.OS"/hr. 46-58" Silt loam(23'f6 ciay), fractured in upper 10YA 4/6, no roots, 10", few fate roots 30-56" Wrsalc to moderately eatitmted in fractures, cemented bardpen, ptrmeability 1 "/hr. impertruable in rwtt-fractured, no Tower part roots, impermeable 58-78" Weak t0 moderate cetttare~d hardpan, 32-42" Loam (20-25% 56-70" Very Site sandy bam no roes, csnitttaoed clay), l OYR 416 (5-10% clay), 7.SYR ptmttesbility .02"/lu. compact, tto roots, 41b, no roots, eadmated estunated permeability 78-132" Extremely gnveily pertncability .5- 2-4"/hr. loamy fine sand (S% 1"/hr. clay), t OYR 4/4, no 70-94" Extremely gravelly roots, estimated 42-b0" Moderatety loamy fine sand (cS96 permeability 15"/hr. cemented hardpan, ctay), variegated non-fractured, no color, tm toots, roots, impermeable estimated permeability 15"lltr. 60-135" Extremely gravelly briny fine sand 94-140" Extremely gravelly (5% clay), 10YR homy coarse sand 4J4, no roots, (<5°~ clay), variegated estitttated cobr, no roots, perrr>eability 15"/hr. eetimr~cd permeability 15-20"lhr. Addltiomal Imfo: TH.1 -1~ree water (water table) at 10i"depth. TH2 -Free water (water table) at 8l" depth. TH3 - Ft'ee wales (water table) at 123" depth. Ju 1.28 ' 00 8:43 ELJ EhITEF ^ SES FAX 1-2085-1 650 P. 2 JN1.20 'W 10:1.9 EW ENTERPI?t,6S ' - ,.., FEiX 1-286-376-1650 P, 2 w'-"~i ' . _'_'~~ ~~-~--~-~-- r AMW N ~ NON 1N1 A! - Ilq I~ A~W Nw10 A~rY Am. Am, •nN ••r 5 ~ MM1 A pN a ~r ~ i ~ Asa .,,._,_.~~~.-,,,A,,,~r~~~H ~--•--~...... ^,Nw, ~ Aw """ ~ ~. w~N i w ! aI i YM AMA A rN A aM N IN - aMw 1M11 awl _A pw •w s/Nl ` - - - •w • A INt ,~. ~~ Aw~I sw Iw. ~ - ~ A w. ~ I w ' ~ »+ Awn 1 N1N `~ 1 s wn A ~~ ~ Imw ~ ~ ' ~ ,~ I r>w. sw~' ~ ~ , ~ aw I i nwI / ~ . ! i.N. iA ~. i !m a .M ~ nr NA nr ! N I ~ i N~ ti j~ i.. . sNN A~ NMI 'A wN AwN aLN Nww aw aNII ar AA+ N1a 'r a1~ ~ i ~ ~ iAI iIM ~/• A` ~ ^~ •Iw `~~~• . ~.~ ..~ / ~ J YI iAl ~ IV• •+P ^ IIN ^ f[N ~ a /N0~ A t i111I IAA A NM 1 ilrl .~ i ~/ 1 fA NNb. A~ 1 .~ ~ ~ N ~ • AA ~ A AM lrl A N Ng N us •~ `^ iYY 1wr Aw A~ A~NM `'~.~~~ ~ 7 ~ r~ ,. - ~ allw ~ iM AN I 'y sw •~ fM- iwR y0. law Ian A aw '~ '~ /r /AN/ /Mk _ NM AfA• Auf ~ . .~ ~ aau~Cj iWn / /w~ o~ (_ r y a.tA. A~rr aar ' N . wI a~ sow /w a ww _ w • ~w ~~ 1 sa* i~u ~ Ihw w~~ i.~ 'srw ,7f ;,~ l ttt AAl/ sM.r ~ awn •Nr N1~ AMN - I Irt t NMI ~.~ f/N Nr A1~ /~ ~ i~Nl~ I fi ~ i1M Nnd 1\ A~ ~ iA~ ' I ~~•~ • aNw NM -~.~-~..~~-~,~~_. ~.~ ~ _~_~._T~ ABM + ' MINI / I Nw f f ~ ~ ~ / a7 I .,•\ aML AwN AEI iNN /MII NMNt •p NMt a4t LNp~ 7A11 fNp NoNi I wN 'I` i-.. 1~ ail N.. 1 i fN A w1 N wY a M~ I IFS • AN N rM a IM/ IMI • wIt / rN N ~Y N NO IINn •N)• Nw .NM ilNi iW Nlna ~r iri iNr iai wwA •~ NM 1~ i1Nl •aIp I i~Nw /~ rl .~ ,s 1 /~ Mf ~e~at ny: , ~ 2[78 888 6854, Aug-3t •~, 8:45ABA, i ~RIG~ gtl~IDy'6~ISIOt*I PRQIP~~'I°~ ®WNFRS W~'f3[IN ~!' L~i?51.IF; $+'AMILY TRUS"I' MUC~R$ FA~413I.Y TRUST 1 f 85 O~PRE'Y" R IDLE RD EAGLE~ID 8361fM{jQOt? 3615 P}i 1~fiErRII?IAN RD !t'vI~11.';I'F RICK R & ttUl-tI7'f? ,jAYNE Nl 3317 N CURT DR MERIDIAN ID 83542-55(17 33I7 N CURT DR MERIDIAN C~IY 33 L 1i3A1iC4 ~iVI; MERIt.}$AN I17 83442-2431 3245 N MI?RiDIAhI RD IiAI'fv~SS DAVID t~l do BAYLE~S EUNICE J 3tibf) N ItriERII?IAPd ItT? MERIDIAN ID 83642-54Zt3 BLAd7E$ V 1, do I R REV LVivt;'I'R.ST 54I3 E L'~TYCK. RI} MERIDIAN ID 63442-5548 54U F, UfiTICK RD MCHIRAiEY FRQPERTY TRUST' 11b2 BI~NTt~AK LN ShN JOtSE C A 95129-3104 {7GLE'r'FiOR4A~ I? Ec MARGARET I 3545 C~TRT DR MERII7~$.~N ID 83442-5522 IvIURRiTHt3MAS LCpREN ~c I~ANC"Y G 3§75 C~.3RT DR MERIDIAN ID 83642-5522 ROBERTS Rt?NAi.I3 P & LINI3A L 3525 trURT DR MERIDIAN 3Ra 83642-.5522 t1t+,SY''u~ARY)ANJE F:LIZI~3ETH 'tRrZ~:U13NNE?FI' RYCI-TARO DEE 3479 C:€;R'i' f1k. MERIDIAN $D 83642-5557 $R4CI~ETT JA:YIES R.~ ~RnCI~ET°r B ~N 3425 Ci1R1° llR MFRII~IAN iD 83442-5557 BENN~ 1'T' E:flW/ARD } 34U1 C:I?RT DR MI:RII)IAN ID ~3b42-5557 SKOGSBERC= D1X7AYNE E & I,AUItFNE 3265 CURT DR ~`~ii?RIDIAN ID 63642-5507 PRESBYI°ERY CsF BOiSF 2if1 lV USTICK MIrRiDihAi ID 83442-t)ilU4 3165 N MERIi7ihN RD PARIt5 MARION E 275 F'. USTICK RD ML'RIDIfII~ ID 83642-5503 WAI.CH VAL A & V-/AI,CN MARY LUU 315 E USTICK RD ;[vERIDIAN 1D 63542-5,544 CUUt;Ei SDAVID J & COUCH CUNSTANCE M 395 F., USTICK RI? M$ItIDIAN ID 63b42-,5549 N I+AUTN LN fiANSEN MllRRP,Y L & HANSI?ICI RAQU$I, i. 375 I? USTICK RD MERIDI.A.N ID 83642-5549 I3ItAMBLE DENNIS D JR 82 E FASTBROOK GT MIrRIi3It1N 1D 83642-OOtX3 MI;RRTZ'I` RICKY D MERRTi'Y MARIE A I12 E E.r1STBR(?tDK 4:RT MERIDIAN ID 83f~42d10(}Q MICI•IA~LSCFN NOLEI?N _' 128 E EA57'13R0®K CRT MERIDIAN ID 83642-5572 Page 2/5 Sent 8y: ; IIURST~VERNAL W & 156 E E557BR4?OK CT MERIDIAN ID 83642-5572 DA1~' GiSRY I3 & KIMEfi J,SN£T S 3 78 E F?~STI31tCK3K ~:T MERIDIAN ID 83642-5572 BEDFORD PLACF_ C-~INF~S ASSOC INC 12a26 Qr~ EXI'LOREIt I7~R STE 22U SCIISE tD 63723.156U N AR1it~W WOt}D STtAY E LSTIL;K RI) Ii®RCF~ARDT MICFiAI_'L R & 13C)RC-~ARDT NANCY A 398 E IGAR CT MERIDE~Ai`t I1] 83~i42-4422 KAt)F't.3RI3 MICHEAL W KAllI't3KIJ NANCY R 4D0 E I~3GAR t~R'I' i~ERIIJI'iAN YD 83642-4422 ANDE$LS(7N TRACY R & ANDE$.SUN KATIiI,.F"F.N L 414 E FSC3GAI2 f: I' MI?RIllf.AN ID 83b4~2-4422 a10 E EDGAR CRT iOFI.iER KATHRYN f? 424 t? F3TX~AR CT MERIr~I aN I:t~ r~.3na~-lpt~a "CUELI;,'ER LARRY KAY do TuRT~-.Te?~ JULIE As~N 44{5 H f~DGAR CT I~IERI£$IAN ID 83ba2-4422 C®Z I.IER DLJNt; AN C & f:C~LLIE,IL Rt1NI C' 464 L' $DGAR CT MERIIIAN ID &3642-4422 STRBIatT' ALLAN i 488 E I~DGAR CI ~'~RERII3IAN II? 83642-4422 BENi~~Tr r,RE~ 5149 C~t'sNABY I.N I~RhIP4 iI3 836A7-Otxx) 550 E 1~DGAR ST 208 888 6854; Aug-3t-00 8:46A~1; Page 3/5 LANU1tL "I'AMRA L 572 E EDGAR 5!` MER,II~IAN ID 83442-000ii BRIGI-ITON CORPC}ItATInN 32426 W FXNLORER, DR S'I'F 22D BOISE 1D 83713-Y 550 596 E EDGAR S'i' LOTS' PHILLII' T & LU'IT JI»RALYN 626 R F.DtaAR ST i~4ERIDIAAI in $3(x42-0000 HICKS LONNIE K i85 E EASTI3R©C-K C"t' Mi?R.IllIAN ID 83642-5572 I trtWLEY TIMUTHY Ii iii E EA5T33ROOK (:'!' MERIDIAN ID 83f,42-5571 83 E EAS`I'I3RCX]K CRT GALi.[ON RICHARD LYNN 113 L EAS7'IiRC?C-K CT MERIDIAN ID 83642-5372 RCiGF„RS WESLLIY L: 129 E EA517lROOK CT MERIDIAN ID 63642-5572 lIR1NI{ STP,VF.N R~BEICT" & BRINK L7INA LYNN 179 E EA5TI3RUOK CT tiIER.IDIAN ID 83b42-5572 CASTILLO J FRANK & f.A~BRECHT-CC.;ASTIi.1.{3 DUNN.t~ M 157 t? EAS'I'BRCsC1K C7' MERI'L3t~#N ID 63b42-557? '~UUILLIAMS RUAtALD L 399 E EDGAR CRT MERIDIAN ID 83fia2-01)00 K©BZA ROBFRT•j .~z KOB~'1 ANITA L 415 E EIJGAR CT MERIDIAN ID 83642-4422 MCUINNIS `1'HCJMAS L~ a!!.3 L EDGAR CT MERIDIAN Ill tt3fi42-aa22 Sent By; ; DAv~s J~t.K M ~ DAMS CIiERYL S 429 F EAR CT \~tE}ZiI3~tSN ID a3~42•aa22 ~~~:~ EDVV~r~ PETER J~ & MURRr15' I3EF3F3I£: !?LAINF. a5S L I:fbGf'~R MERID~Ald II7 83G42-3484 W!-iiTN~Y PAUL L & WH.i7`NRY WANDA L 471 I? 1?~7C`:AR CRT I~tERID$AN 717 83442-4422 2©B BBB 6854; Aug-31-0, 6:47AM, Page 4/5 tJELSC)3~d GRP.Gt~itY~ Nf?LSON DE80dRAH 489 L' t~.i3GAR CT MERIDIAN IT3 83542-4422 ~atvvvty MATTHBI~C~ u ~ BRUWN AU17kEY L 547 E EDGAR ST Mf'.ILIDIAN iD 83042-Ot)(T(3 COLLINS ~'IIJ..~iAItIE 84b E PENNSYi.VANIA BOISE ID 837U6-4U()0571 $ LDGAR ST ,~ ._. ~ ~.. ... ,.. .. _, _l_ ~, ~~ r`te`------e S~ _ n A• n [ d d O C U /n Y G L VOIGT DEVELOPMENT CO. P. O. BOX 2044 208-524-6000 IDAHO FALLS, ID 83403 12x3 DATE 8-29-00 s2-Fii: Po THE City of Meridian ORDER OF ~ ~ 1,636.20 DOLLARS E~M°~„ First 5ecur~ty~ Banking • Investments . /nsurance /I -1-8800-574-420`~0 FOR /t /~ lV 2 X ~ / / v ~ -.~xr ~Il.l N N c -e -_ / -__. ~_-___. __.-_._-__M II'00 l 28 3u' ~: L 24 100064:00 2 00 2 2 7 u^ ---- - -- ---------------Y.._ ._._____-__---~---------------_~.. ~----- Ulseo.,le .n••~Yd d.Y.m nom. sY- ~~ G L VOIGT DEVELOPMENT CO. P. O. BOX 2044 208-524000 IDAHO FALLS, ID 83403 PAY City of Meridian TO THE ORDER OF 8-29-00 DATE .SIT~la3 Mtu~ ~l ~,J First 5ecur~tyID Banking • /nvestments • /nsurance q 1-800-574-4200 FOR ~K ~' I i71 / NNE _P~l?~ *- S~ /~c~ 1~ N[ ~ ------- u'00 L 28 2u' ~: 1 24 100064:00 2 00 2 2 7 -~ v G) ~ ~ ~ N O N c D ~: O ~, O D - o r ~'_"~ ~ d 3 N 0 W ~ 0 W u ~ `~ N w a ~ c f A( v1 r `_ 3 ~ R W .~ `~ N 04 A C fD N ' _ CJ ~ ~ C ~~<``yyy~ \ 1 ( ^ ) 1i ~ ' O y ~ ,v ( w V \ ~ 4 a n A `, \ S n A ~ 3 ~ m s a ry ~ (t W ~( ° p~ (.v ~ ~ D ~ G ~ ~ N m ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ...I y o CD D r X v D 0 ~) `. ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ (~N - -- - ~ -- - - -- - -- -- -- ~ -- O 9 R ~`T ^~ `J ^ V ~ V' ~ ( ~ ~J D Z O C; a v -. c a 3 a~, cD ~ ~ O ~ ~ N Z CD ^a\ o `~ l~\~ ~V Q v 0 1282 sz-si iza i oz 2,873.00 -DOLLARS ~~. ~uT 7 9 C (~D Q. n~' w ° O ~ ~ m~ a ~~~~~ wo o ~ n1 ~v ~a Z n ....... .. .......... ........::~....... ~::: sl~ ......................... ~:~:~. DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY AUGUST 31, 2000 SUBMITTED T0: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT 318 E. 37TH ST. AnISF In R371d .-.. ........ _ e....,...,,.. DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. I SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY AUGUST 31, 2000 SUBMITTED T0: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT 318 E. 37TH ST. BOISE, ID 83714 U ~ DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. 777 HEARTHSTONE DR , BOISE, ID 83702 (208)345-3290 /'\ ... PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Study Objectives :. SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 1 This study was initiated to assess the traffic impacts resulting from the development of the Sundance Subdivision and to evaluate the capacity of the ~. road system to accommodate the site-generated traffic. Dobie Engineering, Inc., --~ was retained by the applicant, G. L. Voigt Development Company, to perform this traffic study in accordance with ACRD policy for development impact ,:, studies. On-Site Development ~' Sundance Subdivision is a proposed 69 acre mixed use development containing 215 single family lots plus 4 office sites (30,000 sf). The property is located at the northeast corner of the Ustick and Meridian Road intersection in Meridian, Idaho. The project will be developed in phases and is now estimated -- to be fully developed by the year 2005. Illustrated in Figure 1 is a general vicinity map showing the location of the ~'" proposed subdivision and adjacent roads. _.. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. ... ~` n .. r~ PROJECTED TRAFFIC Existing Road System Traffic Volume SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 2 The current average daily traffic volumes on the major roadways near the site are listed in Table 1. ~` Table 7 Existing Traffic Volumes - Average Dailv Traffic• Vehicles per Dav~ Date of Count: Meridian Road South of McMillan Road 3,162 4/96 Meridian Road North of Fairview Avenue 12,659 7/gg Ustick Road East of Ten Mile Road 3,633 5/99 ,. Ustick Road West of Locust Grove Road 6,906 g/gg Meridian Road is designated as a minor arterial. Adjacent to the site Meridian Road is improved with two traffic lanes with 3 ft. paved shoulders. t South of Ustick Road, Meridian Road has a three lane urban section with 5 ft. sidewalks. The posted speed limit is 50 mph north of Ustick and 35 mph south of Ustick Road. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. .. .-. SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 3 Ustick Road is a minor arterial with a two lane 30 ft. paved section. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. The Meridian Road/Ustick Road intersection has all-way-stop-control with left-turn lanes on the north and south approaches. With existing traffic volumes the intersection operates at LOS A (ref. Appendix A.) The adjacent lands are mostly undeveloped and no stub streets are currently extended to the site. - In 1999 through traffic counts were made by ACRD staff. Additional PM _ peak hour turning movement counts were recently obtained by Dobie Engineering, Inc., and are summarized in Figure 2. .a .. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. ._ v~u~~e: UCI r SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 4 Trip Generation The following trip rates are recommended in the ITE Trip Generation Manual , (6th Edition), for the proposed land uses. These rates were used in r this report to project traffic volumes within the study area: Table 2 Trip ~. Generation Rates Occurance Residential General Single Family Office (per Unit) (per KSF) y Weekday End Trips 9.57 11.0 AM Peak Hour 0.75 1.56 -^ Enter (25%) (88%) Exit (75%) (12%) _.. PM Peak Hour 1.01 1.49 Enter ... (64%) (17%) Exit (36%) (83%) ~. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. ... ^ ~ SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY .• 5 " Using the trip generation rates in Table 2, future site-generated traffic was estimated for full buildout of the Sundance Subdivision . The findings are presented in Table 3. Table 3 l Site-Generated Traffic (Rounded) Number New Trios/Dav AM PH Trigs PM PH Trigs Residential Lots 215 lots 2060 160 215 General Office 30 KSF 330 45 45 Total 2390 205 260 Traffic projections for the study area were obtained from APA and reflect ,, current planning assumptions in their transportation planning model. Table 4 .~ Reg ional Traffic Model Proiections (Rounded) 2005 2020 Meridian Road North Approach 2,700 3,900 ~. South Approach 4,400 9,200 Ustick Road East Approach `~ 7,700 11,400 West Approach 8,500 10,400 Note: Existing traffic now exceeds projections on North Meridian Road. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc Jh ._ -, SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY .. 6 Traffic Assignments Based on the trip generation rates and regional growth projections ~. previously presented, future trips resulting from development of the Sundance ~. Subdivision lots were estimated and assigned to the internal streets and project entrances. The projected average daily traffic volumes on the internal streets at full buildout of the subdivision are illustrated in Figure 3. _ Shown in Figure 4 are projected year 2005 turning movements at the main entrances at full buildout of the subdivision. .. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. ,ti N FIGURE ~ SUNDANCE SUBD1111SIaN Yf~ 24Q5 AVERAGE aA~L~` TRAF'F(~ 0 0 z I '~ A w USTICK ROAD 0 a Traffic Study Prepared 8~e DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. m H~r.e.. o.. 9e1~ o erg 3~e-~o .- ~~~~ ~ N SU~~#A~C~ SUB130~~IC~J YFZ 2~ lF~~[~IG 1~~tt~t~E~'ts~ ~ PEA ~~R 0 Q 0 Z Q 0 ~~ N `~y ~ I~ ~~ 0 ~- ~tw 3a J •F 33Q t so 33cy .~ 7o z, ` `1 ~ I~ o ~n o n ~ ro cat ~ 37~ ~s 375 .~ UST#CK ft()AD Traffic Study F'rapored Syc DOBIE E~tGINEERtNG, INC. m tt.e.d.ma. ur g,u,s m a~oz sus-~mo .-, SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY ~. 7 CAPACITY ANALYSIS -LEVEL OF SERVICE A capacity analysis and a Level of Service calculation were prepared to evaluate the present and future traffic conditions at both the Sundance Subdivision access and the Ustick Road intersection with Meridian Road. Assumed in the analysis were years 2005 traffic conditions. This analysis was based on the procedures and methodologies developed in the Highway Capacity -- Manual (TRB Report 209) for non-signalized intersections. Capacity Analysis: Project Entrance Projected future traffic volumes at the project intersections are shown in Figure 4. It was assumed in the calculations that Ustick Road would be improved to a three lane section at the Meridian Road intersection by the year .,. 2005. The findings of this analysis for the project entrances are summarized in Table 6 below. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. ~.. SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY .. _ ~ Table 6 Level of Service Analysis Project Entrances 4 Year 2005 Peak Hour "' Left Tum In Left Turn Out Intersection From Main Road From Side Street LOS .„ South Drive ~ Ustick Road A C A West Drive cGD Meridian Road A B A - These findings indicate that both the intersection of the South Drive with Ustick Road and the West Drive with Meridian Road will function within acceptable standards. Refer to Appendix B for details of this calculation. r The office portion of the development will have relatively low traffic volumes on each driveway. The LOS at these intersections will be A/B for all movements. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. -- ~ ~-. SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY ... 9 Capacity Analysis: Arterial Intersection Presented in Table 7 are the results of a level of service calculation for the all-way-stop-control intersection of Meridian Road and Ustick Road. Service ._.. level standards were calculated for the year 2005 PM Hour using existing lane geometry on Meridian Road with the addition of left-turn lanes on the east and west approaches. Details of the calculations are attached in Appendix C. Table 7 LOS Analvsis at Meridian Road/Ustick Road Intersection Year 2005 Traffic Volumes Approach Existing With Left-Turn Lane Northbound C C Southbound B g ..~ Eastbound D C Westbound C C ''~ Intersection C C -~ A small improvement to eastbound traffic flow on Ustick Road would result from the addition of a dedicated left-turn lane. ..~ Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. .-. SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY .~. 10 -` Capacity Analysis: Arterial Roads The capacity of the adjacent section of Ustick Road, shown in Table 8, was calculated for the year 2020 with the addition of the site generated traffic. w Table 8 _ Arterial Capacity - SiteTraffic Conditions Year 2020 Peak Hr. Volume No.Lanes Vol./Cap. LOS Ustick Road 1150 2 0.69 B Meridian Road 800 2 0.48 A ` Both Meridian Road and Ustick Road will provide sufficient capacity through the year 2020 to accommodate the projected traffic. A two-lane section should be adequate. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY -' 11 Capacity Analysis: Lane Geometry at Project Entrances The need for auxiliary lane improvements at the project entrances were evaluated to determine if site related improvements would be needed to serve _. the development. Year 2005 traffic conditions were evaluated. Table 9 Auxiliary Lane Warrants Arterial Tumina Maximum Warrant Ustick Rd./South Drive Volume Volume Art. Volume Met Left Turn 375 vph 40 100 Yes ` Right Tum 8000 vpd 35 10,000 No Arterial Turning Maximum Warrant Meridian Rd./V1/est Drive Volume Volume Art. Volume Met Left Tum 280 vph 15 100 Yes Right Tum 6000 vpd 40 10,000 No Source: ACHD Policy Manual Update Memo (7-17-96) A left-turn lane is warranted on both Meridian Road and Ustick Road. ,.. The right-turn lane warrant is not met for either intersection. No auxiliary lanes .... are required at the office driveways. _. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. ... SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY ~` 12 -- Site Access Roads The West Driveway to Meridian Road will be constructed as a median r divided "T" intersection with stop control on the local street. Access to Ustick Road will also be constructed as a median divided "T" _ intersection with stop control. The South Driveway is approximately 150 ft. east ,.._ of Fauth Place, a private lane. The South Driveway is approximately 750 ft. west of Arrowood Way, a residential collector south of Ustick Road. The separation between these offsetting driveways is adequate. The office driveways will be offset approximately 220 ft. and 440 ft. for the arterial intersection in line with ACHD standards. ._. .._ Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. r~ APPENDIX ,.-. ..~ ,'"~ APPENDIX A .. ... ..~ ~ ~~~ HCS_ Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c 9920C HC0 - ___________________________ . Pale 1 _________ '"- Center For Microcomputers In Transportati ______ on __ ~ -__ University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 _ Streets: (N-S) MERIDIAN ROAD Anal st ( E-W) USTICK ROAD y ................... P. DOBIE Date of Analysis........_. 7/29/0 Other Information.........EXISTING CONDITIONS YR. 2000 -` All-way Stop-controlled i ntersection ----- __________________ Eastbound Westbound _______________ Northbound ______________ Southbound -- L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- o. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 Volumes 10 140 ---- 1 ---- 1 < 0 ---- -- 1 1 -- ---- < fl r 50 30 110 5 PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 95 50 95 180 50 15 200 25 . --_-_-- . .95 .95 . 95 .95 --------Volume Summary and Capacity Analys ------ is Worksheet ----- ------- ------ - EB --------- WB -------- NB ------ SB -- _, LT Flow Rate RT Flow Rate ---ii- -----32-- ----53 ------ 16 Approach Flow Rate 53 211 5 153 53 295 26 253 Proportion LT - Proportion RT 0.05 0.21 0.18 0.06 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.25 153 0.03 0.18 0.10 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate -548 211 548 253 364 295 _... Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.23 0.17 0 32 364 0 28 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.17 0.23 . 0 28 . 0 32 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 . . Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 2 2 LT, Opposing Approach 32 11 2 16 2 RT, Opposing Approach 5 53 53 LT, Conflicting Approaches 69 69 26 53 -- RT, Conflicting Approaches 79 79 43 43 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.21 0.05 58 0 06 58 0 18 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.03 0.25 . 0 10 . 0 18 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.13 0.13 . 0 12 . 0 12 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.14 0.14 . 0 16 . 0 16 Approach Capacity -- 398 470- . 732 . 698 -------------- -- - ---- --------- -------- ----- Intersection Performance Summary -- Approach Approach v/ C Average -Movement- -Flow-Rate -Capacity Rat io Total Delay LOS - .._. EB 211 398 0.53 WB - - 7.5 - B 153 470 0.33 NB 295 3,4 A 732 0.40 SB 253 698 0 36 4.6 A . 4.fl A Intersection Delay = 4.9 Level of Service (Intersection) = A ~, ~ - /~ APPENDIX B ~^ ~ ~~~ HCS: Unsignalized Int..~sections Release 2.1c 0054.HC0 Page 1 ---------------------------------------- Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-03?8 Streets: {N-S) USTICK ROAD {E-W) SOUTH DR. Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ................... P. DOBIE Date of Analysis.......... 7/29/0 Other Information.........SITE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS YR. 2005 Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield volumes PHF Grade MC's ( o) SU/RV's (o) CV's {o) PCE's 0 > 1 0 N 40 375; .95 .95 ~ 0 1.10 0 1 < 0 N 375 40 .95 .95 0 I Adjustment Factors 0 0 0 1 0 1 25 25 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2..60 - Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 3.4.(b) Class B. The Class B member shall be G.• L. voigt Development co. , an, Idaho Corporation Upon the recording hereof, Sundance shall be entitled to three (3) votes for each Lot owned. The Class B membership shall cease and be converted to Class A membership on January 1, 20 ?S, or - upon the sale of all Lots owned by Sundance ~ any phase or division of the Sundance addition as may appear on any Plat or approved Preliminary Plat, whichever event shall fast occur. 3.5 Board of Directors and Officers. The affairs of the Association shall be conducted by a Board of Directors and such officers as the Directors may elect or appoint, in accordance with the Articles, Bylaws, and this Declaration as the same may be amended and supplemented from time to time. 3.6 Powers and Duties of the Association. 3.6.(a) Powers. The Association shall have all the powers of a non-profit corporation organized under the general non-profit corporation laws of the State of Idaho subject only to such limitations upon the exercise of such powers as are expressly set forth in the Articles, the Bylaws and this Declaration. It shall have the power to do any and all lawful things which may be authorized, required or permitted to be done by the Association under this Declaration, the Articles and the Bylaws, including the following: (i) Assessments. The power to levy assessments (initial, annual, special and limited) on the Owners of Lots and to enforce payment of such assessments, all in accordance with the provisions of this Declaration. (ii) Common Areas. The power to acquire, own or control all landscape easements, and Common Areas in the Properties, to maintain the same for the benefit of the Properties, to levy assessments and pay and provide for the maintenance of said Common Areas, and to take all necessary and proper action to provide for the management and use of the same. (iii) Enforcement. The power and authority from time to tune in its own name, on its own behalf or on behalf of any Owner or Owners who consent thereto, to commence and maintain actions and suits to - 12 - n restrain and enjoin any breach or threatened breach of this Declaration or of the Articles or the Bylaws, including the Association rules adopted pursuant to this Declaration, and to enforce by mandatory injunction or otherwise, all provisions thereof. (iv) Delegation of Powers. The authority to delegate its power and duties to committees, officers and employees, or to appoint any person, firm or corporation to act as manager. Neither the Association nor the members of its Board shall be liable for any omission or improper exercise by the manager of any such duty or power to be delegated. (v) Association Rules. The power to adopt, amend and repeal by majority vote of the Board such rules and regulations as the Association deems reasonable and which are consistent with this Declaration (the Association Rules). (vi) Emergency Powers. The Association or any person authorized by the Association may enter upon any Lot in the event of any emergency involving illness or potential danger to life or property or when necessary in connection with any maintenance or construction for which it is responsible. Such entry shall be made with as little inconvenience to the Owners as practicable and any damage caused thereby shall be repaired by the Association. (vii) Licenses, Easements and Ri is-of--Way. The power to grant and convey to any third party such licenses, easements, rights-of- way or fee title in, on, through or under the Common Areas or any landscape easement as may be necessary or appropriate for the orderly maintenance, preservation, and enjoyment of such Common Areas and for the preservation of health, safety, convenience and welfare of the Owners, for the purpose of constructing,. erecting, servicing, operating or maintaining underground lines, cable, wires, pipes, conduits, and other devices for the transmission of any utility service or other public or quasi-public service. (viii) Landscape Easements. The power to control, administer and maintain vegetation on, aesthetic quality of and the means and manner of water distribution to all landscape easements running in - 13 - ,r favor of the Association and the power to take all measures necessary to control, administer and maintain the same. 3.6.(b) Duties of the Association. In addirion to power delegated to it by the Articles, without limiting the generality thereof, the Association or its agents shall have the obligation to conduct all business affairs of common interest to all0wners, and to perform each of the following duties: (i) Insurance. Obtain from reputable insurance companies authorized to do business in the State of Idaho and maintain in effect the following policies of insurance: A. Directors and officers liability insurance if the Board so elects. B. Such other insurance, including but not necessarily limited to workers compensation insurance to the extent necessary to comply with all applicable laws. C. Any liability, casualty or other insurance the Board may deem necessary to carry out the Association functions or to insure the Association against any loss. D. The Association shall be deemed trustee of the interests of all Members of the Association for any insurance proceeds paid to it under such policies, and shall have full power to receive their interests in such proceeds and to deal therewith. E. Insurance premiums for the above insurance coverage shall be deemed a common expense to be included in the annual assessments levied by the Association. (ii) Rule Making. Make, establish, promulgate, amend and repeal the Association Rules. (iii) Architectural Control Committee. Appoint and remove members of the Committee, upon the conditions specified in this Declaration. - 14 - (iv) Ri is of Way and. Pedestrian Accesses. Maintain, repair and replace any landscaping, fencing, or other Improvements located on or within the Properties and designated as pedestrian accesses, walkways, paths or open spaces. (v) Common Areas. Maintain, operate, repair, and provide for the use and management of all Common Areas, storage facilities, screening fences, subdivision entrances, and recreational facilities within the Properties. (vi) Landscape Easements. Provide, maintain and protect the vegetation on, and aesthetic quality of landscape easements, and to provide, maintain and repair water delivery systems necessary to nurture such vegetation and create and maintain such aesthetic quality. 3.7 Personal Liability. No member of the Board or any committee of the Association (including but not limited to the Architectural Control Committee) or any officer of the Association, or the Declarant, or the manager, if any, shall be personally liable to any Owner, or any other party, including the Association, for any damage, loss or prejudice suffered or claimed on the account of any act, omission, error or negligence of the Association, the Board, the manager, if any, or any other representative or employee of the Association, the Declarant or the Architectural Control Committee, any other committee or any officer of the Association, or the Declarant, provided that such person has, upon the basis of such information as may be possessed by him, acted in good faith without willful or intentional misconduct. - 15 - .~:. m F~ /'~ .YL` ARTICLE IV COVENANT FOR MAINTENANCE AND ASSESSMENTS 4.1 Creation of the Lien and Personal Obligation of Assessments. Each Owner of any Lot, by acceptance of a deed therefor, whether or not it shall be so expressed in such deed, is deemed to covenant and agree to pay the Association the following: 4.1.(a) Annual regular Assessments or charges; 4.1.(b) Special Assessments for capital improvements, such Assessments to be established and collected as hereinafter provided; and 4.1.(c) Limited Assessments as hereinafter provided. The regular, special and limited Assessments, together with interest, costs and reasonable attorney's fees, shall be a charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien upon the property against which each such Assessment is made. Each such Assessment, together with interest, costs and reasonable attorney's fees shall also be the personal obligation of the person who was the Owner of such property at the time when the Assessment fell due. The personal obligation for delinquent Assessments shall not pass to his successor in title unless expressly assumed by such successor. 4.2 Purpose of Assessments. 4.2.(a) Regular Assessments. The regular Assessments levied by the Association shall be used exclusively to promote the recreation, health, safety and welfare of the residents in the Properties and for the improvement and maintenance of landscaped areas maintained by the Association, including but not limited to landscape easements, to pay property taxes and other assessments, to maintain, operate and improve any Common Areas, and to pay other reasonable costs and expenses which are incurred by the Association in carrying out the duties and business of the Association; 4.2.(b) Special Assessments for Capital Improvements. In addition to the annual regular Assessments authorized above, the Association may levy, in any assessment year, a special Assessment applicable to that year only for - 16 - ~-. the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, costs and expenses of the Association which exceed the regular Assessments, provided that any such Assessment shall be approved by a majority vote of each class of members who are voting in person or by proxy at a meeting duly called for this purpose. 4.2.(c) Limited Assessments. Limited Assessments may be levied against any Owner in an amount equal to the costs and expenses incurred by the Association, including legal fees, for corrective action necessitated by such Owner, and, further including without limitation, costs and expenses incurred for the repair and replacement of any property maintained by the Association damaged by negligent or willful acts of any Owner or occupant of a Lot who is occupying the Lot with the consent of such Owner, or for maintenance of landscaping performed by the Association which has not been performed by Owner as provided herein. 4.3 Initial Assessment. Each owner shall pay an initial regular Assessment in the amount of One Hundred Fifty and No/100ths Dollars ($150.00) to join the Association; together with an additional amount equal to the first regular annual assessment prorated to the date of conveyance. Payments shall be due upon conveyance of a Lot to an Owner by the Declarant and shall be collected at closing. 4.4 Maximum Annual Regular Assessment. The amount of the regular annual Assessment to be assessed by the Association, shall be One Hundred Fifty and No/100th Dollars ($150.00) per Lot per year. 4.4.(a) The maximum annual Assessment may be increased by the Board each year by not more than ten percent (10%) above the maximum Assessment for the previous year without a vote of the membership of the - - Association as provided below. 4.4.(b) The maximum annual Assessment may be increased above ten percent (10%) by a majority vote of each class of the members who are voting in person or by proxy, at a meeting duly called for this purpose. 4.4.(c) The Board of Directors of the Association may fix the amount of the annual Assessment at an amount not in excess of the maximum as established from time to time. - 17 - 4.4.(d) The total annual regular Assessment levied against the Lots owned by the Declarant, shall be the lesser of (a) the amount of the regular assessment per Lot multiplied by the number of lots owned by the Declarant or (b) the difference between the total annual Assessment levied against Lots owned by parties other than the Declarant, and the reasonable expenditure of the Association for the purposes described in Section 4.2.(a) for the fiscal year. In the event the annual reasonable expenditures of the Association do not exceed the amount of the annual regular assessment per Lot multiplied by the number of Lots owned by parties other than the Declarant, then the Declarant shall owe no regular assessment for the Lots then owned by the Declarant. 4.5 Notice and Quorum for any Action Authorized Under Section 4.2.(bl and 4.4. Written notice of any meeting called for the purpose of taking any action authorized under Sections 4.2.(b) and 4.4 shall be sent to all members not less than ten (10) days nor more than fifty (50) days in advance of the meeting. At the first such meeting called, the presence of members or of proxies entitled to cast fifty-one percent (51%) of all the votes of each class of membership shall constitute a quorum. If the required quorum is not present, another meeting may be called subject to the same notice requirement, and the required quorum at the subsequent meeting shall be forty percent (40%) of all the votes of each class of membership. No such subsequent meeting shall be held more than fifty (50) days following the preceding meeting. 4.6 Uniform Rate of Assessment. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, both annual and special Assessments must be fixed at a uniform rate for all Lots and may be collected on an annual or other basis as determined by the Association from time to time. 4.7 Date of Commencement of Annual Assessments -Due Dates. The annual regular Assessments or any special Assessments then in effect, as provided for herein, shall commence as to a Lot or Lots on the first day of the first year following the conveyance of the Lot or Lots from Declarant to an Owner or Owners. The Board of Directors shall fix the amount of the annual Assessment against each Lot at least thirty (30) days in advance of each annual assessment period. Written notice of the annual Assessment shall be sent to every Owner subject thereto. The due dates shall be established by the Board of Directors. The Association shall, upon demand, and for a reasonable charge, furnish a certificate signed by an officer of the Association setting forth whether the Assessments on a specified Lot have been paid. A properly executed certificate of the Association as to the status of Assessments on a Lot is binding upon the Association as of the date of its issuance. - 18 - ''., 4.8 Effect of Non- a ent of Assessments aRedatelshall bear inters t on. An Assessment not paid within thirty (30) days after th Y from the due date at a rate of eighteen percent (18%) per annum. The Association may bring an action at law against the Owner personally obligated to pay the same, or foreclose the lien against the property. No Owner may waive or otherwise escape liability for the Assessments provided for herein by non-use of the Common Area or abandonment of his Lot. 4.9 Association Lien for Un aid Assessments. Alien shall attach to each Owner's Lot and all real property situated thereon for unpaid Assessments and interest accruing thereon as set forth herein. 4.10 Association Lien Subordinate to Mortgages. The lien of the Assessments provided for herein shall be subordinate to the lien of any first mortgage. (Mortgage as used in this context includes conventional mortgages and Deed of Trust arrangements). However, the sale or transfer of any Lot pursuant to mortgage foreclosure or any proceeding in lieu thereof, shall extinguish the lien of such Assessments as to payment which became due prior to such sale orduanafte rtransfelr.nNo ale orltransfeonal liability of the seller or any lien for assessments shall relieve such Lot from liability for any Assessments thereafter becoming due or from the lien thereof. ARTICLE V ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE 5.1 Members of the Committee. The Architectural Control Committee for the Property, sometimes referred to as the "Committee", shall consist of three (3) members. The following persons are hereby designated by Declarant as the initial members of the Committee: Name Address Gary L. Voigt 1908 Jennie Lee Drive Idaho Falls, Idaho 83404 Eric C. Guanell 1908 Jennie Lee Drive Idaho Falls, Idaho 83404 - 19 - r.. Gary Patrick 1908 Jennie Lee Drive Idaho Falls, Idaho 83404 Each of said persons shall hold office until such ti ovaded herein.signed or has been removed or his successor has been appointed, as p 5.2 Ri~l-t of Appointment and Removal. At any time Declarant is the Owner of at least one (1) of the Lots, Declarant shall have the right to appoint and remove two (2) members of the Committee. Th re ove all me be~s oDf thetConunittee. Association shall have the power to appoint and Members of the Committee may be removed at any time, without cause. 5.3 Review of Proposed Construction. The Committee shall consider and act upon any and all proposals or plans and specifications submitted for its approval pursuant to this Declaration, and perform such o~ n of construction in progr s to assure assigned to it by the Board, including the mspec its conformance with plans approved by the Committee. The Board shall have the power to determine, by rule or by written designation consistent with this Declaration, which types of improvements shall be submitted to the Committee for review and approval. The Committee shall approve proposals or plans and specifications submitted for its approval only if it deems that the construction, alterations or additions contemplated thereby in the locations indicated will not be detrimental to the appearance of any structure affected thereby and will be in harmony with the surrounding structures, and that the upkeep and maintenance thereof will not become a burden on the Association. The maintenance of property values is a primary objective hereof. The Committee may make provision in its rules and guidelines for implementation and maintenance of value standards that will carry out such intent. 5.3.(a) Conditions on Approval. The Committee may condition its - approval of proposals or plans and specifications upon such changes therein as it deems appropriate, or upon the agreement of the Owner submitting the same (hereafter "Applicant") to grant appropriate easements to the Association for the maintenance thereof, or upon the agreement of the Applicant to reimburse the Association for the cost of maintenance, or upon all three, and may require submission of additional plans and specifications or other information before approving or disapproving material submitted. 5.3.(b) Committee Rules and Fees. The Committee also may establish, from time to time, rules and/or guidelines setting forth procedures for the required content of the applications and plans submitted for approval. Such - 20 - ~'1 rules may require a fee to accompany each application for approval, or additional factors which it will take into consideration in reviewing submissions. The Committee shall determine the amount of such fee in a reasonable manner, provided that in no event shall such fee exceed One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00). Such fees shall be used to defray the costs and expenses of the Committee or for other purposes established by the Board. Such rules and guidelines may establish, without limitation, procedures, specific rules and regulations regarding design and style elements, landscaping and fences and other structures such as animal enclosures, as well as special architectural guidelines applicable to Lots located adjacent to public and/or private open space. 5.3.(c) Detailed Plans. The Committee may require such detail in plans and specifications submitted for its review as it deems proper, including without limitation, floor plans, landscape plans, drainage plans, elevation drawings and descriptions or samples of exterior materials and colors. Until receipt by the Committee of any required plans and specifications, the Committee may postpone review of any plan submitted for approval. 5.3.(d) Committee Decisions. Decisions of the Committee and the reasons therefor shall be transmitted by the Committee to the Applicant at the address set forth in the application for approval within thirty (30) business days after filing all materials required by the Committee. Any materials submitted pursuant to this Article shall be deemed approved unless written disapproval by the Committee shall have been mailed to the Applicant within thirty (30) business days after the date of the filing of said materials with the Committee. The said thirty (30) day period shall only commence to run when an authorized representative of the Committee has executed an applicable form acknowledging acceptance of such application and acknowledging that such application is complete. 5.4 Meetings of the Committee. The Committee shall meet from time to time as necessary to perform its duties hereunder. The Committee may from time to time by resolution unanimously adopted in writing, designate a Committee Representative (who may, but not need be, one of its members) to take any action or perform any duties for and on behalf of the Committee, except the granting of variances pursuant to Section 5.9. In the absence of such designation, the vote of any two (2) members of the - 21 - Committee, or the written consent of any two (2) members of the Committee taken without a meeting, shall constitute an act of the Committee. 5.5 No Waiver of Future Approvals. The approval by the Committee of any proposals or plans, specifications or drawings for any work done or proposed, shall not be deemed to constitute a waiver of any right to withhold approval or consent as to any similar proposals, plans and specifications, drawings or matter whatever, subsequently or additionally submitted for approval or consent. 5.6 Compensation of Members. The members of the Committee shall receive no compensation for services rendered, other than reimbursement for expenses incurred by them in the performance of their duties hereunder, except as otherwise agreed by the Board. 5.7 Inspection of Work. Inspection of work and correction of defects therein shall proceed as follows: 5.7.(a) Upon the completion of any work for which approved plans are required under this Article, the Owner shall give written notice of completion to the Committee. 5.7.(b) Within sixty (60) days thereafter, the Committee or its duly authorized representative may inspect such improvement. If the Committee finds that such work was not done in substantial compliance with the approved plans, it shall notify the Owner in writing of such noncompliance within such sixty (60) day period, specifying the particular noncompliance, and shall require the Owner to remedy the same. 5.7.(c) If for any reason the Committee fails to notify the Owner of any noncompliance within sixty (60) days after receipt of the written notice of completion from the Owner, the improvement shall be deemed to be in accordance with the approved plans. 5.8 Nonliability of Committee Members. Neither the Committee nor any member thereof, nor its duly authorized Committee representative, shall be liable to the Association, or to any Owner or Applicant for any loss, damage or injury arising out of or in any way connected with the performance of the Committee's duties hereunder, provided such person has, upon the basis of such information possessed by hire, acted in good faith without willful or intentional misconduct. The Committee shall review and approve or disapprove all plans submitted to it for any proposed improvement, alteration - 22 - ~ ^ or addition, solely on the basis of aesthetic considerations and the ovepralrltybe en i~~ol detriment which would result in the immediate vicinity and to the Pro e g Y• The Committee shall take into consideration the aesthetic aspects of the architectural designs, placement of building, landscaping, color schemes, exterior finishes and materials and other similar features, but shall not be re~pa n~0 relate to strucltural safety of its approval of any plan or design be construed in any y buildings and improvements or their conformance with building or other codes. 5.9 V The Committee may 1 cation or an Sue pementoalmpliance with any of the architectural provisions of this Dec ar Y P Declaration, including restrictions upon height, size, floor area or placement of structures, or similar restrictions, when it deems such action appropriate because of the existence of circumstances such as topography, natural obstructions, hardship, aesthetic or environmental considerations. Such variances muste and shall be ome effective upon signed by at least two (2) members of the Committe , ~ such a recordation in the Office of the County Recorder of Aaa County. variance is granted, no violation of the Restri havesoccurred w th respectlto the matter for Supplemental Declaration shall be deemed to which the variance was granted. The ~ ~s Declararion or ofcany Supplemental to waive any of the terms and provisions Declaration, for any purpose, except as to the particular property and particular provision covered by the variance, nor shall it affect in any way the Owner's obligation to comply with all governmental laws and regulations affecting his use of the premises, including but not limited to, zoning ordinances and Lot setbacks lines or requirements imposed by any governmental or municipal authority. ARTICLE VI ANNEXATION OF ADDITIONAL PROPERTIES 6.1 Right of Annexation. Declarant presently intends to develop other neighboring properties and may, in Declarant's discretion, deem it desirable to annex some or all of such other properties to the property covered by this Declaration. The annexed properties may, at Declarant's solerd is lations~ Such other propertie smay be purpose allowed under appropriate zoning gu annexed to the Property and brought- within the provisions of this Declaration by Declarant, its successors or assign, at any r~eBoard of Dittrecto sA s~ such properties are approval of any Owner, the Association o developed, Declarant shall, with respect thereto, record a Supplemental Declaration, which shall annex such properties to the Property and which may supplement this _ 23 - ~ ~ Declaration with such additional or different covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations and easements as Declarant may deem appropriate for the other properties or portions thereof and may delete or eliminate as to such other properties such covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations and easements as Declarant deems not appropriate for the other properties. 6.2 Method of Annexation. Annexation of real property authorized under Section 1 hereof shall be accomplished by filing of record in the Office of the County Recorder of Ada County, Idaho, a Supplemental Declaration describing the real property to be annexed and extending the plan of this Declaration to such real property. 6.3 Supplemental Declarations. Each Supplemental Declaration contemplated by Section 6.2 hereof may contain such additional or different provisions, covenants, conditions and restrictions not found in the Covenants of this Declaration, provided that such shall not be inconsistent with the general plan of this Declaration. Said additional provisions may include, but need not be limited to, provisions for special maintenance, use restrictions, limited common areas, party walls, parking regulations and any other matters of common concern to owners of any lots in the annexed property. No provisions, covenants, conditions or restrictions contained in a Supplemental Declaration shall be considered applicable to any real property except real property described in a Supplemental Declaration unless otherwise expressly provided. 6.4 Effect of Annexation. Upon the recording of a Supplemental Declaration, all the real property described or covered by the Supplemental Declaration shall be deemed subject to all of the Covenants contained in this Declaration as if, and to the same effect as, the annexed real property was part of the Subject Property (the real property originally specified in and subject to this Declaration) except as specifically stated in the Supplemental Declaration, and to the additional or different provisions, covenants, conditions and restrictions, which may be stated in the Supplemental - - Declaration; and the Association shall have and shall accept and exercise jurisdiction over such property as a part of the Subject Property. In the event of conflict or inconsistency between a Supplemental Declaration and this Declaration, the terms of the Supplemental Declaration shall prevail as to the particular real property described or covered by that Supplemental Declaration. ARTICLE VII EASEMENTS 7.1 Landscape Easements. The Association shall hereby be granted common areas or landscape, open space, pedestrian access and utility easements - 24 - described on the plat for Sundance Division No. 1 and recorded in the records of Ada County, Idaho. Said common area or easements shall be for the purpose of promoting the aesthetic quality and value of the Property and shall be maintained by the Association. t . 7.2 Utility Easements. Easements for installation, use and maintenance of utilities, roads, the irrigation and other support systems are reserved as shown on the recorded plat. Within these easements, no Improvement shall be placed or permitted to remain which may damage or interfere with the installation and maintenance of utilities, roads and other support systems. The easement area of each Lot and all Improvements shall be maintained continuously by the Owner of the Lot, except for those improvements for which a public authority or utility company is responsible or such easements and/or Common Areas maintained by the Homeowner's Association. ARTICLE VIII GENERAL PROVISIONS 8.1 Enforcement. The Association or any Owner, shall have the right to enforce, by proceedings at law or in equity, all restrictions, conditions, covenants, reservations, liens and charges now or hereafter imposed by the provisions of this Declaration. Failure by the Association or by any Owner to enforce any covenant or restriction herein contained shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. 8.2 Severability. Invalidation of any one of these covenants or restrictions by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any other provision which shall remain in full force and effect. 8.3 Interpretation. The terms, covenants and conditions hereof are to be read and interpreted consistently and in a manner to protect property values. 8.4 Term and Amendment. The covenants and restrictions of this Declaration shall run with and bind the land, for a term of twenty (20) years from the date this Declaration is recorded, after which time they shall be automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years unless an instrument signed by seventy-five percent (75%) of the then Owners of the Lots has been recorded, agreeing to change said covenants in whole or in part. This Declaration may be amended, restated, replaced, terminated or superseded during the first twenty (20) year period by an instrument signed - 25 - ~'~, By the President and Secretary of the Association affirming that such amendment was approved by atwo-thirds (2/3) vote of each class of members. Provided, however, that if Declarant is still the Owner of any lots the provisions of Article V may not be amended without the written consent and vote of the Declarant. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the Declarant herein, has hereunto set his hand and seal this day of , 2000. G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT CO. By: GARY L. VOIGT President -26- EXHIBIT "A" See Attachment -27- ~-. , ~uc1"r°!-d~ .-. HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c fl054.HC0 Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 416 `" Potential Capacity: (pcph) 852 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 852 Prob. of Queue-Free State: - 0.97 -- ---- ------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB -------- EB ------------------------------------------------ r Conflicting Flows: (vph) -------- 437 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1061 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1061 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.96 " TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: {pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. -~ of Queue-Free State: 0.94 ------------------------------------------------ Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB -------- SB ------------------------------------------------ _ Conflicting Flows: (vph) -------- 853 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 340 Major LT, Minor TH - Impedance Factor: 0.94 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.94 Capacity Adjustment Factor „_. due to Impeding Movements 0.94 Movement Capacity: {pcph) 321 Intersection Performance Summary Avg . 95 0 -- Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh} (sec/veh) i SB L 29 321 12.3 0.2 C 8.3 SB R 29 852 4.4 0.0 A EB L 46 1061 3.5 0.0 A 0.3 - Intersection Delay = 0.6 sec/veh .,. HCS: Unsignalized Int..rsections Release 2.1c 0054.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 - ------------ Streets: {N-S) MERIDIAN ROAD {E-W) WEST DR. Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ................... P. DOBIE Date of Analysis.......... 7/29/0 Other Information.........SITE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS YR. 2005 Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (o) CV's ( o) PCE's 0 1 < 0 N 230 35 .95 .95 0 0 > 1 0 N 15 280 .95 .95 0 I 1.10 ~ 0 0 0 Adjustment Factors 1 0 1 20 10 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 - Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 .~. '~ ~~ ~T 4~P, HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c 0054.HC0 Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------- - Step l: RT from Minor Street --------------- WB --- EB -------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) --------------- 260 --- - Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1022 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1022 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.99 - --------------------------------------- -------------- --- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB --------------------------------------- _,,, Conflicting Flows: (vph) -------------- 279 --- Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1262 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1262 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.99 _ TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. .~ of Queue-Free State: 0.98 --------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street -------------- WB --- EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 572 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 494 Major LT, Minor TH - Impedance Factor: 0.98 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.98 Capacity Adjustment Factor ,,._, due to Impeding Movements 0.98 Movement Capacity: (pcph) ---------------------------------------- 485 -------------- --- - Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% -- Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph} (pcph) (pcph}(sec/veh} (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 23 485 7.8 0.0 B 6.4 WB R 12 1022 3,6 0.0 A SB L 18 1262 2.9 0.0 A 0.1 Intersection Delay = 0.4 sec/veh r ~ ~''~ APPENDIX C / ~ / ~ r+ If" ~° ~ "1/ HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Rele ase 2.1c 9920C.HC0 Page 1 - Center For Microcomputers In Transport ation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall - Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 -- --------------- _ Streets: (N-S) MERIDIAN ROAD (E-W) USTICK ROAD Analyst ................... P. DOBIE Date of Analysis.......... 7/29/0 Other Information.........SITE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS YR. 2005 -- All-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound _. L T R L T R L T R L T R No . Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 1 1 < 0 1 1 < 0 Volumes 30 330 70 50 33fl 20 70 215 60 25 240 35 - PHF ------------ .95 .95 .95~ -- -- .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 -- ---------------------------------------- Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis worksheet -- ----------------------------------------------------------- ----- -- - -------- -------- EB WB - NB SB -------------------------------------- _ LT Flow Rate ---------- 32 ----------- 53 ---- 74 -------- 26 RT Flow Rate 74 21 63 37 Approach Flow Rate 453 421 363 316 Proportion LT 0.07 0.13 0.20 0.08 ""' Proportion RT 0.16 0.05 0.17 0.12 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 421 453 316 363 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 679 679 874 874 .... Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.29 0.27 0.23 0.20 Proportion, Opposing Approach Fiow Rate 0.27 0.29 0.20 0.23 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 2 2 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 2 2 _ LT, Opposing Approach 53 32 26 74 RT, Opposing Approach 21 74 37 63 LT, Conflicting Approaches 100 100 $5 85 -- RT, Conflicting Approaches 100 100 95 95 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.13 0.07 0.08 0.20 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.05 0.16 0.12 0.17 _ Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches O.IS 0.15 0.10 0.10 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0,15 0.15 0.11 0.11 Approach Capacity -------------------------------------- 554 ---------- 587 ----------- 578 ---- 544 -------- Intersection Performance Summary - Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity ------- -- -- Ratio Total Delay LOS - -- ------ --------- EB 453 554 ------- 0.82 --------- 22.4 -- ---- D WB 421 587 0.72 15.3 C NB 363 578 0.63 10.9 C SB 316 544 0.58 9.1 B Intersection Delay = 15.1 Level of Service (Intersection) = C ~ I HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c 0054.HCO P age 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: {904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) MERIDIAN ROAD (E-W) USTICK ROAD ................ P. D©BIE Analyst ... Date of Analysis.......... 7j29/0 Other Information.........SITE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS YR.. 2005 All-way Stop-controlled Intersection ~,,,,~ `~-~-4- 1..+~°C` 'TU`~~ ~i ~ ------------ --------------- Eastbound ----------- Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No . Lanes 1 1 < 0 1 1 < 0 1 1 < 0 1 1 < 0 Volumes 30 330 70 50 330 20 70 215 60 25 240 35 PHF _95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis Worksheet ---------------------------------- -------- ----- ------------------------ EB WB NB SB ----------------------------------------- LT Flow Rate ------ 32 ----------- 53 -------- 74 ----- 26 RT Flaw Rate 74 21 63 37 Approach Flow Rate 453 421 363 316 Proportion LT 0.07 0.13 0.20 0.08 Proportion RT 0.16 0.05 0.17 0.12 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 421 453 316 363 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 679 679 874 874 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.29 0.27 0.23 0.20 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.27 0.29 0.20 0.23 Lanes on Subject Approach 2 2 2 2 Lanes on Opposing Approach 2 2 2 2 LT, Opposing Approach 53 32 26 74 RT, Opposing Approach 21 74 37 63 LT, Conflicting Approaches 100 1.00 85 85 RT, Conflicting Approaches 100 100 95 95 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.13 0.07 0.08 0.20 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.05 0.16 0.12 0.17 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.10 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.15 0.15_ 0.11 0.11 Approach Capacity ----------------------------------------- 654 ------ 687 ----------- 578 -------- 544 ----- Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio ----- Total Delay ----------- LOS ---- ---------- EB ---------- 453 --------- 654 -- 0.69 13.9 C WB 421 687 0..61 10.3 C NB 363 578 0.63 10.9 C SB 316 544 0.58 9.1 B Intersection Delay = 11.2 Level of Service {Intersection) = C ~~ O ~ .~ ~T .~- \y r- ~i i ~ r ... ,~"'~ "` W tp O V W y - s,a~ - ~~~E f R ~ f ~I~ ~)i ...r 19fc ~, as s sss s s 1/ ~ ss ~, ~"e GOP DECLARATION OF COVENANTS CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR SUNDANCE DIVISION NO 1 THIS DECLARATION is made effective on the day of , 2000, by G.L. Voigt Development Co., an Idaho Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Declarant". WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of certain real property in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as the "Property", more particularly described as fallows: All that certain real property described in Exhibit A hereto, which exhibit is incorporated herein by this reference. NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant hereby declares that the Property and each Lot, parcel or portion thereof, is and/or shall be held, sold, conveyed, encumbered, hypothecated, leased, used, occupied and improved subject to the following terms, covenants, conditions, reservations, easements and restrictions, all of which are declared and agreed to be in furtherance of a general plan for the protection, maintenance, subdivision, improvement and sale of the Property, and to enhance the value, desirability and attractiveness of the Property. The terms, covenants, conditions, reservations, easements and restrictions set forth herein shall run with the land constituting the Property and with each estate therein and shall be binding upon all persons having or acquiring any right, title or interest in the Property or any Lot, parcel or portion of the Property and interest therein, and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon Declarant, it successors in interest and each Grantee or Owner and his respective successors in interest, and may be enforced by Declarant and/or by any Owner or his successors in interest. ,r ~'~, Notwithstanding the foregoing, no provision of this Declaration shall be construed as to prevent or limit Declarant's right to carry out and complete the development of the Property and to construct improvements thereon, nor Declarant's right to maintain model homes, construction, sales or leasing offices or similar facilities on any portion of the Property, nor Declarant's right to post signs incidental to construction, sales or leasing. ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS 1.1 "Articles" shall mean the Articles of Incorporation of the Association ~as the same may from time to time be amended. 1.2 "Assessments" shall mean those payments required of Owners and Association Members including regular, special, limited and such Assessments of the Association as further defined in this Declaration. 1.3 "Association" shall mean and refer to s,indance Homeowners Association, Inc., anon.-profit Idaho corporation, its successors and assigns. The Association shall include, when the context requires, its Board of Directors, officers and other authorized representatives and agents as the same, or any of them, may from time to time be constituted. 1.4 "Association Rules" shall mean those rules and regularions promulgated by the Association governing conduct upon and use of the Property under the jurisdiction or control of the Association, the imposition of fines and forfeitures for violation of Association Rules and Regulations, and procedural matters for use in the conduct of business of the Association. 1.5 "Beneficiary" shall mean a mortgagee under a mortgage or beneficiary under a deed of trust, as the case may be, and/or the assignees of such mortgagee, beneficiary or holder, which mortgage or deed of trust encumbers parcels of real property on the Property. 1.6 "Board" shall mean the Board of Directors or other governing board or individual, if applicable, of the Association. 1.7 "Building Lot". The term "building lot" shall mean and refer to any parcel of real property shown on a recorded Plat or map, any approved Preliminary Plat - 2 - ~, ^, or otherwise described in a recorded instrument, which is identified as an individual lot to be used as a single family residential building site within the entire s'ar;~an~e addition including any phase or division thereof whether or not actually annexed by the Association. The term "building lot" shall also include any "Unit" when such is platted and capable of being sold as a single family residence. A "Building Lot" does not include any lot designated as a common area, landscape easement, open space, pedestrian access which is designated as such on the subdivision plat or specified as being owned by the ASS~Clation. 1.8 "Bylaws" shall mean the bylaws of the Association. 1.9 "Common Area" shall mean all real property within the Property in which the Association owns an interest and which is held for the common use and enjoyment of the owners or for betterment of the Property and shall include any landscape, open space, pedestrian access or utility easement designated on any Plat related to the Property. 1.10 "Corrunittee" shall mean the Architectural Control Committee described in Article V hereof. 1.11 "Declaration" or "Amended Declaration" shall refer to this declaration as hereafter amended ar~d supplemented from time to time, and as recorded in the records of : Aaa County. 1.12 "Declarant" shall mean and refer to the c. z. voigt Development Co. , an Idaho ~corporanon or its successors and assigns. 1.13 "Detached Structure" shall mean any roofed structure with permanent supporting walls or pillars on any Lot which is detached from the Unit on such Lot. 1.14 "Crr<~.ntor" shall mean and refer to the Declarant. 1.15 "Improvement" shall mean any structure, facility or system, or other improvement or object, whether permanent or temporary, which is erected, constructed or placed upon, under or in any portion of the Property, including, but not limited to buildings, fences, streets, drives, driveways, sidewalks, curbs, landscaping, signs, lights, mailboxes, electrical lines, pipes, pumps, ditches, waterways, swimming pools and other recreational facilities and fixtures of any kind whatsoever. 1.16 "Lot" shall mean and refer to a Building Lot. - 3 - 1.17 "Member" shall mean each person or entity holding membership in the Association. 1.18 "Mortgage" shall mean and refer to any mortgage or deed of trust and "Mortgagee" shall refer to the mortgagee, or beneficiary under a deed of trust, and "Mortgagor" shall refer to the mortgagor, or grantor of a deed of trust. 1.19 "Owner" shall mean and refer to the record Owner, whether one or more persons or entities, of a fee simple title to any Lot which is a part of the Property, including contract buyers, but excluding those having such interest merely as security for the performance of an obligation. 1.20 "Plat" shall mean the recorded Plat of sundance Division No. 1, and any other recorded Plat pertaining to the real property described in Exhibit A and the recorded Plat of any other Properties annexed hereto. Any such plat and the specifications therein are incorporated and made a part of this Declaration by this reference. 1.21 "Properties" or "Property" shall mean and refer to the real property hereinbefore described, and such additions thereto as may hereafter be annexed and brought within the coverage of this declaration as more particularly provided for herein. 1.22 "Set: Back" shall mean the minimum distance between the dwelling unit or other structure referred to and a given street, road or Lot line. 1.23 "Unit" shall mean the one single family dwelling which may be situated upon a Lot. ARTICLE II GENERAL COVENANTS CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS 2.1 Land Use and Building Tme. No Lot shall be used except for residential purposes, and no Lot shall be used for the conduct of any trade or business or professional activity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board may, in its discretion after request by an Owner, allow an Owner to conduct a garage sale upon such Owner's Lot. Except as specifically provided otherwise in this Declaration or any Supplemental Declaration, no improvements shall be erected, altered, placed or permitted -- 9 - to remain on any Lot other than one designed to accommodate no more than one (1) single-family residential dwelling. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may, in its discretion after request by an Owner, allow an Owner to place a Detached Structure which the Committee determines to be architecturally and aesthetically compatible with any Unit on the Lot. 2.2.(a) Size Limitations. Split level and two (2) story Units shall have not less than 1301 square feet of interior floor area, exclusive of porches and garages of which at least soo square feet shall be ground level floor area. Single-level Units shall have not less than 1301 square feet of interior floor area on the ground floor of the main structure, exclusive of porches and garages. No Unit higher than split level or two (2) story shall be permitted. 2.1.(b) Gara es. Each Unit constructed on the Property shall include at least a two (2) car, enclosed garage as an attached, integral part of the Unit structure. No garage door shall exceed ten (10) feet in height measured from the ground level. 2.1.(c) Roofin .The roof of each Unit shall, at a minimum, be 25-year (or better) architectural grade shingle, tle or shake with at least a 5/ 12 pitch. Roof color shall be subject to approval by the Committee. 2.1.(d) Chimneys. All chimneys on a Unit shall have chimney enhancer caps. 2.1. (e) Mailboxes. All mailboxes shall be subject to U.S. Postal Services Rules and Regulatons and will be clustered. 2.2 Architectural Control. No Improvements which will be visible above the ground or which will ultimately affect the visibility of any above ground Improvement shall be built, erected, placed or materially altered on the Property, including without limitaton, change of exterior colors or materials, unless and until the building or other plans, specificatons, and a plot plan thereof have been reviewed in advance by the Architectural Control Committee and the same have been approved by the Committee. The Committee may, ire its reasonable discreton, approve or disapprove such Improvements based upon all relevant factors, including without limitaton: design and style, mass and form, value, topography, setback requirements, exterior color and materials, and such Improvements, physical or aesthetc conformity to surrounding terrain and the other Improvements on the Property. Said requirements as to the approval of the architectural design shall apply only to the exterior appearance of the Improvements. - 5 - This Declaration is not: intended to serve as authority for the Architectural Control Committee to control the interior layout or design of buildings except to the extent incidentally necessitated by use and size requirements. 2.3 Maintenance: Owners Obli ag bons. No Improvements, including, but not limited to mail boxes and landscaping, shall be permitted to fall into disrepair, and each Improvement shall at all times be kept in good condition and repair by the Owner thereof. In the event that any Owner shall permit any such improvement, including trees and landscaping, to fall into a state of disrepair or to create a dangerous, unsafe, unsightly or unattractive condition, the Board, upon fifteen (15) days prior written notice to the Owner of said Lot, shall have the right to correct such condition, and to enter upon such Owner's Lot for the purpose of doing so, and such Owner shall promptly reimburse the Association for the cost thereof Such cost shall be a limited Assessment and shall create a lien enforceable in the same manner as other Assessments set forth herein. The Owner of the offending Lot shall be personally liable, and his Lot may be subject to a lien for all costs and expenses incurred by the Association in taking such corrective action, plus all costs incurred in collecting the amounts due. Each Owner shall pay all amounts due for such work within ten (10) days after receipt of written demand therefor, or the amounts may, at the option of the Board, be added to the amounts payable by such Owner as regular Assessments. Each Owner shall have the remedial rights set forth herein if the Association fails to exercise its rights within a reasonable time following written notice. In the event the Improvements on any Lot shall suffer damage or destruction from any cause, the Owner thereof shall undertake the repair, restoration or reconstruction thereof within ninety (90) days of such damage or destruction. If, after ninety (90) days, the repair, restoration or reconstruction of such damaged or destroyed improvements has not taken place, the Association, upon fifteen (15) days prior written notice to the Owner of such Property, shall have the right to correct such condition, and to enter upon said Owner's Lot for the purpose of doing so and such Owner shall bear all costs incurred by the Association and the Association shall have the lien rights set forth above to enforce payment of the same. 2.4 Set I3ack Requirement for Improvements. All Improvements shall be subject to a front, back and side yard set back requirement; which set back hereby restricts the location of an Improvement any closer to a Lot line than the minimum set back restriction stated herein, or the Plat or as otherwise required by applicable law or ordinance. - 6 - • ~ ~ 2.5 Nuisances. No noxious or offensive activity, including without limitation, those creating an offensive odor or offensive noise, shall be carried on upon any Lot nor shall anything be done thereon which may be or may become an annoyance or nuisance to the neighborhood. 2.6 Temporary Improvements. No Improvements of a temporary character and no trailer, basement, tent, shack, garage, barn or other outbuilding shall be placed or used on any Lot at any tune as a residence either temporarily or permanently. 2.7 Si~n_s. No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any Lot except one sign of not more than five (5) square feet advertising the Property for sale or rent, or signs used by a builder or the Declarant to advertise the Property during the construction and sales phase of the development. 2.8 Oil and. Mining Operations. No oil drilling, oil development operations, oil refining, quarrying or mining operation of any kind shall be permitted upon the Property, nor shall oil wells, tanks, tunnels, mineral excavations or shafts be permitted upon the Property. No derrick or other structure designed for use in boring for oil or natural gas or otherwise shall be erected, maintained or permitted upon the Property. 2.9 Animals. No animals, livestock, or poultry of any kind shall be raised, bred or kept on any Lot, except that dogs, cats or other household pets may be kept provided that they are not kept, bred, or maintained for any commercial purpose and provided that the keeper of such pets complies with all state, city and county laws, rules and regulations related thereto. No dog runs or kennels shall be permitted to be kept or placed within five (5) feet of a setback line where applicable. Dog runs or kennels shall only be perntted to be placed and maintained at the rear of dwellings and in no event shall such structure be visible from a street. All such kennels or facilities shall comply " with all applicable laws and rules. 2.10 Refuse Storage and Disposal. No rubbish, trash, garbage, refuse or debris shall be placed or allowed to remain on the Property except trash kept and maintained within the interior of a Unit in sanitary containers. All such material shall only be kept in sanitary containers. All equipment for the storage or disposal of such material shall be kept in a clean, neat and sanitary condition. - 7 - 2.1 1 Sewer and Water. Domestic water and sewage disposal are provided by the City of Meridian All dwellings, Units or Improvements must be connected to and use, City of Meridian water and sewage disposal service and pay all fees, costs and expense related to such service. No individual sewage disposal systems, private wells or water systems are allowed. 2.1 2 Construction by Declarant. Declarant reserves the right to construct Units and make other Improvements upon any Lot and to offer the same with completed structures thereon for sale to individual Owners. 2.13 Boats, Campers and Other Vehicles. No boats, trailers, tractors, recreational vehicles (including but not necessarily limited to campers, motorhomes, or similar vehicles or equipment) dilapidated, unrepaired or unsightly vehicles or similar equipment, or trucks (working or non-working) with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) greater than 11,500 pounds shall regularly be parked or stored on any portion of the Property (including streets and driveways) unless enclosed by a structure or screened from view in a manner approved, in writing, by the Architectural Control Committee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any boat, camper, trailer or recreational vehicle which is in good repair and working order may be stored on the side yard of a Lot between the front and rear yard setbacks if screened by a six foot (6') fence. Provided, however, such storage may not be located adjacent to the street on a corner Lot. Any storage pad must be surfaced with concrete or asphalt. - 8 - /`~, ~'~, 2.14 Latrine and Bath Facilities. All bathrooms, sink and toilet facilities shall be inside residential buildings and shall be connected by underground pipes directly to the City of Meridian sewer and water system. 2.15 Antennae and Satellite Receivers. No television antennae, satellite receiver, radio tower, or radio aerial shall be installed on the Property, other than within the interior of a Unit, unless prior written approval has been secured from the Architectural Control Committee as to both location and size. Satellite receivers are permitted but must be located in the back yard of a single-family residence. Receiver dishes may be mounted on a dwelling unit only on the rear portion thereof so as to be out-of--sight to the degree reasonably possible and must be mounted no hig~rer than the eave-line of the roof. If a receiver is pole-mounted, then the pole. height shall not exceed six (6) feet. 2.16 Hazardous Activities. No activity shall be conducted on or in any Unit or Lot which is or might be unsafe or hazardous to any person, the Property or any other tangible item of value. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, no firearms shall be discharged upon said Property and no open fires shall be lighted or permitted on any property except in aself-contained barbecue unit while attended and in use for cooking purposes, or with a safe and well-designed interior fireplace, except such controlled and attended fires required for clearing or maintenance of land. 2.1 ~ Unsightly Articles. No unsightly articles shall be permitted to remain on any Lot as to be visible from any other portion of the Property. Without limiting the foregoing, no clothing or household fabrics shall be hung, dried or aired in such a way as to be visible from any other Lot or any Common Area. No lumber, grass, shrub or tree clippings, plant waste, compost piles, metals, building materials or scrap or other similar material or articles shall be kept, stored or allowed to accumulate on any portion of the Property except within an enclosed structure or appropriately screened from view as approved, in writing, by the Architectural Control Committee. "Screened" is defined as being concealed, at eye level, from any Common Area or Lot other than that containing the screened material. 2.1 s Construction. During the course of actual construction of any permanent Improvements, the restrictions contained in this Declaration and any supplemental declarations shall be deemed waived to the extent necessary to permit such construction, provided that during the course of such construction nothing shall be done which will result in a violation of these restrictions upon completion of construction and - 9 - all construction shall be diligently prosecuted to completion, continuously and without delays. Construction shall commence and shall be substantially completed within one (1) year of the purchase of any Building Lot unless an extension is approved by the Architectural Control Committee. 2..19 Fences. All fences must be of a material, type and color approved in advance by the Committee. No fences are allowed within any front yard set back area. 2..20 Plat Conditions. All covenants and conditions for sundance Division No. 1, and all Plats for subsequent annexations thereto, restrictions, easements and other matters set forth on such Plats are hereby incorporated by this reference and notice is hereby given as to the same. 2..21 Landscaping and Landscaping Plan. Each Lot shall be landscaped by the Owner thereof within ninety (90) day of the occupancy of the Unit thereon weather permitting. Landscaping plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Architectural Control Committee. The failure of the Owner to timely comply with this landscaping requirement shall constitute a failure to perform maintenance and the Association or Declarant may thereupon invoke those rights and remedies provided in this Declaration. 2. 22 Light, Sound and Odor. No light which is unreasonably bright or causes unreasonable glare shall be emitted from any Lot. No sound shall be emitted from any Lot which is unreasonable loud or annoying, and no odors shall be emitted from any Lot which are noxious or offensive to others. 2..23 Detached Structwes. No Detached Structure shall be constructed or located on any Lot, unless the Committee, upon request by the Owner allows such construction or location after deter,nining the Detached Structure is architecturally and aesthetically compatible with the Unit on the Lot and will otherwise be compatible with other improvements within the property. 2..24 Dumping. No excavation material, grass or yard clippings, rubbish, trash, garbage, refuse or debris shall be placed or allowed to remain on any vacant or unimproved Lot, without the prior written Approval of the Declarant or the Architectural Control Committee. No discharge shall be made into any common drainage structure, The Owner of any Lot who dumps such material or makes a discharge into a common drainage shall be liable for all cleanup and/or removal costs and any damage to the Property caused thereby. - 10 - 2,25 Ouali of Improvements. All Improvements within the Properties shall be designed, built and constructed in accordance with any and all applicable building codes, rules, regulations, zoning ordinances, use restrictions and any applicable annexation agreements. ARTICLE III ~,~suNDarrcE _ HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 3.1 Organization of Association. sundance Homeowners Association, Inc. ("Association") is an Idaho corporation formed under the provisions of the Idaho Nonprofit Corporation act and shall be charged with the duties and invested with the powers prescribed by law and set forth in its Articles and Bylaws and in this Declaration. Neither the Articles nor the Bylaws shall, for any reason, be amended or otherwise changed or interpreted so as to be inconsistent with this Declaration. 3.2 Membership. Each Owner within the meaning of the Declaration (including the Declarant), by virtue of being such an Owner and for so long as such ownership is maintained, shall be a Member of the Association. Where title to a Lot is held by more than one person or entity, membership relating to the Lot shall be shared by all such persons in the same proportion and in the same manner as title to the Lot. 3.3 Assi ability of Membership Interest. Memberships in the Association shall not be assignable, except to the successor-in-interest of the Owner, and all memberships in the Association shall be appurtenant to the Lot owned by such Owner. The memberships in the Association shall not be transferred, pledged or alienated in any way except upon the transfer of title to a Lot and then only to the transferee of title to said Lot. 3.4 Voting. The Association will have two (2) classes of voting memberships. 3.4.(a) Class A. Class A members shall be the Owners, with the exception of the Declarant, and shall be entitled to one (1) vote for each Lot owned. When more than one (1) person holds an interest in any Lot, all such persons shall be members. The vote for such Lot shall be exercised as they determine, but in no event shall more than one (1) vote be cast with respect to any Lot. - 11 - FILE COPY BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN C/C 04/03/01 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY ) PLAT FOR SUNDANCE ) SUBDIVISION, LOCATED AT THE) NORTHEAST CORNER OF ) USTICK ROAD AND MERIDIAN ) ROAD, MERIDIAN, IDAHO ) G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT, ) APPLICANT. ) Case No. PP-00-020 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT The above entitled matter coming on regularly for public hearing before the City Council on March 20, 2001 and continued until April 3, 2001, at the hour of 6:30 o'clock p.m., at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, and the City Council takes judicial notice of its action of the denial of the application for annexation and zoning in Case No. AZ-00-021, and the hearing was opened on the preliminary plat application and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and appearing and testifying on behalf of the Applicant were: Steve Arnold and Becky Bowcutt, and the City Council based upon its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order in Case No. AZ-00-021 does FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT FOR SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION (PP-00-020) - 1 hereby deny the application for preliminary plat approval. FINDINGS OF FACT It is found that the Recommendation To City Council of the Planning and Zoning Commission is not reasonable nor appropriate for the conditions of approval of the preliminary plat due to the denial of the annexation and zoning in Case No. AZ-00-021. DECISION AND ORDER Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code Section 12-3-5 and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND THIS DOES ORDER, that based upon the denial of the annexation and zoning in Case No. AZ-00-021, the Council does hereby deny the application for preliminary plat approval. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT FOR SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION (PP-00-020) - 2 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the (7 day of r- 2001. %' By: RT D. CORRIE Mayor, City of Meridian Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. .~,~~.~p, By• ~ Dated: City Clerk D/ ~ ~o Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Sundance Sub AZ021 PP020\FFCLOrdDenyPP.doc ~ S~~L ~ ~+ s '~" h •-''~~~~~r4,,,~ yr i5~ , ~ Q.~,~~~ /~~ .~ fjR`,,vTy rVes~/~``~\~~7~ FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER OF DENIAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT FOR SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION (PP-00-020) - 3 ~"`{ March 30, 2001 P P 00-020 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 3, 2001 APPLICANT G. L. Voigt Development ~~~ ITEM NO. 1~ REQUEST Preliminary Plat approval of 214 single-family lots, 4 future office lots and 23 common lots on 69.79 acres for proposed Sundance Subdivision -- northeast corner of Ustick and Meridian Roads (,`~ t~ ?~.~~.~: ~:t= ~' y AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS See Previous Item Packet l~tT"~ ~If ~~IQ"` l`' `~z ~~I OTHER: Contacted: '?,(~ ~k e ~ ~ ~~~ ~ t_} Date: Phone: ~R~ - ~q ('~1 I T=M~alterials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. _I R~c~~D PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-UP SHEET APR - 3 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE ~~~~ - C '~ ~-~~",< , ~ ~, _ _ 1-~~'r ~ ~ ('~ PROJECT NUMBER (~~ ~s~~~; ~_ ~ ; ~~"~ PROJECT NAME `~ ~~ , NAME FOR AGAINST ~U l~ ~.~ WHITE PETERSON ~~~~ WHITE, PETERSON, MORROW, GIGRAY, ROSSMAN, NYE & ROSSMAN, P.A. KEVIN & DINNS CHRISTOPHFd2 S. NYE JuLIEKLr;[xFlsctmt P[m,IPA.Piz~msox WM. F. GIGRAY, III ERIC S. ROSSMAN BRENT J. JoHI,rsox TODD A. ROSSMAN D. SAMUQ, 7oHIVSOx DAVID M. SWARTLEY LARRY D. MOORE T>;xRExCER WHITE** WQ.LIAM A. MORROW NICHOLAS L. WOLLIN WILLIAM F. NICHOL$* *Also admitted in OR ** Also admitted in WA ATTORNEYS AT LAW 200 EAST CARLTON AvE., SUITE 31 PosT OFFICE Box1150 MERIDL4N, IDAHO 83680-1150 NAMPA OFFICE 5700 s. FRAxxLIx RD, sT&. 200 NAMPA, IDAHO 83687-8402 TEL. 208)466-9272 FAX ( 08) 466405 To: Staff Applicant Affected Property Owner(s) Re: Application Case No. Tn. (208)288-2499 FAx (208) 288*2501 E-MAU,: @wPPMC.coM March 13, 2001 PP-00-020 PLEASE REPLY TO MERLDJAN OFFICE RECEIVED MAR 19 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN ~~n' CLERK OFFICE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Staff, Applicant and/or Affected Property Owner(s): Please note that these Findin s and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be presented to the pity Council at the public hearing on the above referenced matter by the Plannin and Zoning Administrator. Due to the volume of matters which the City Council must deci~e, and to insure your position is understood and clear, it is im ortant to have a consistent format by which matters are presented at the public hearings befPore the City Council. The City Council strongly recommends: 1. That you take time to carefully review the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, and be ppreppared to state your position on this application by addressing the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zonmg Commission; and 2. That you carefully complete (be sure it is le 'ble) the Position Statement if You d><sagree with the Findings and~ecommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Position Statement form for this application is available at the City Clerk's office. It is recommended that you pprepare a Position Statement and deliver it to the City Clerk prior to the hearing, if possible. if that is not possible, pplease present your Position Statement to the City Council at the hearing, along with eight (S) copes. The coppes will be ppresented to the Mayor, Council, Planning and Zoning Administrator, Public WorZcs and the City Attorney. If you are a part of a ggrroup, it is stropgly recommended that one Position Statement be filled out for the group, wFiich can be signed by the representative for the group. Very truly yo `~ /. 8 ~ City Attorney's ice ly/ BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION, G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT, Applicant Case No. PP-00-020 RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL 1. The property is approximately 69.79 acres in size and is generally located at the northeast corner of Usticlc Road and Meridian Road in Meridian, Idaho. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is the McBirney Property Trust of San Jose, California. 3. The Applicant is G.L. Voigt Development of Idaho Falls, Idaho. 4. The subject property is currently zoned R-T. However, there is an application before the City Council for annexation and zoning to R-8 Medium Density Residential. The zoning of R-8 is defined within the City of Meridian's Zoning and Development Ordinance Section 11-7-2. 5. The subject property is within the city limits of the City of Meridian. 6. The entire parcel of the property is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 1 PRELIMINARY PLAT -SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION - G.L. VOIGT 7. The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following manner: 214 single family lots, 23 common lots and 4 office lots for a residential subdivision. 8. There are no significant or scenic features of major importance that affect the consideration of this application. RECOMMENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the preliminary plat as requested by the Applicant for the property described in the application, subject to the following: ~ ~ Adopt the Planning and Zoning Administrator and Assistant City Engineer Recommendations as follows: 1. Applicant shall obtain a letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names. 2. Applicant shall coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 3. Sanitary sewer service to this development will have to be provided by the future White Trunlc Sewer, which is being designed at this time. The Trunk alignment/construction is totally dependent on whether or not the subdivision layout of the future Bridgetower Subdivision on the east side of Ten Mile, north of Usticlc, is satisfactory to the City, ACRD, the irrigation district and other agencies, and that the appropriate easements can be obtained. If this future phase of Bridgetower is approved (which has not even been submitted to the City yet), the Public Works Department would probably proceed with surveying and easements procurement along the proposed route. Approximately 3 to 4 months of RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT -SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION - G.L. VOIGT design time, followed by 6 or so months of construction is expected. The Public Worlcs Department anticipates the trunk being completed by the end of 2001, assuming a relatively smooth approval process. Since the Bridgetower Subdivision layout is so critical to the future White Trunk, and given the City has not received a formal application on the subdivision yet, the Planning and Zoning Commission feels strongly that it would be premature to annex the proposed Sundance Subdivision until the White Trunk alignment is better known and easements have been obtained by the City. This proposed development cannot be provided sanitary sewer service by gravity into any existing city sewer system. When sewer is available, applicant will be responsible to construct sewer mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline. 4. Water service to this development shall be via extensions from the existing main in Ustick Road adjacent to the proposed subdivision. Applicant will be responsible to construct water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer shall coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Worlcs Department. 5. Underground pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on site. Due to the landscape area, primary water supply connection to the City's mains will not be allowed. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. Applicant has not indicated whether the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and maintained by an association or the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. If the system is being proposed as a private system, plans and specifications for the irrigation system shall be reviewed by the Public Worlcs Department as part of the development plan review process, and a draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system O&M manual must be submitted prior to plan approval. 6. A detailed landscape plan for the common areas, including fencing locations and details, pathways and types of construction, shall be submitted for review and approval with the submittal of the final plat application. The plan must include sizes and species of trees, shrubs, berming/swale details, and all proposed ground cover/treatment. No fencing will be permitted within the required landscape buffers. A letter RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT -SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION - G.L. VOIGT of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the Final Plat. Perimeter fencing shall be installed prior to obtaining building permits. 7. As shown on the plat, the Usticlc Road landscape buffer shall be a minimum of 30-feet in width beyond the required ACHD right-of-way and constructed by the developer as a condition of the plat. The Meridian Road landscape buffer shall be increased to 35 feet to meet the minimum buffer width along entryway corridors. The landscape buffers shall be placed in common separate lots (as shown). Fencing is not to encroach upon these buffers. 8. Six-foot-high, solid, perimeter fencing shall be required along the full northern and eastern boundaries of the subdivision. Applicant shall submit detailed fencing plans for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat. All required fencing is to be in place prior to issuance of building permits. A letter of credit or cash will be required for these fences prior to signature on the final plat. 9. Lot 4, Block 9 (pocket park lot) shall be designed to prevent accumulated water from standing for periods longer than 24 hours. The maximum side slope of this storm drainage lot shall be 4:1 and it shall be planted with grass. 10. The soils investigation report submitted with the application indicates that additional monitoring was to be conducted through October 15, 2000 within the project site. Design engineer to provide the Public Works Department with results of the additional monitoring, and a statement of compliance which certifies that the centerline finish grade of the streets, public or private, is at least three feet above the established normal ground water elevation, prior to the approval of development plans. This is an effort to ensure that the building footings are at least one foot above the highest groundwater elevation. 11. As Residential Collectors, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that N. Broadwater and W. Great Falls Street be constructed with detached sidewalks (parkway design) from their point of access on to Meridian Road and Usticlc Road the full length of the 20-foot wide landscape buffers. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 4 PRELIMINARY PLAT -SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION - G.L. VOIGT 12. City Ordinance 12-4-12 states, "Bicycle and pedestrian pathways shall be encouraged within new developments as part of the public right of way or as separate easements so that an alternate transportation system (which is distinct and separate from the automobiles) can be provided throughout the City urban service planning area." Since no front-on housing is permitted along N. Broadwater and W. Great Falls Street (as Residential Collectors), Planning and Zoning Commission recommends Applicant coordinate with ACRD to provide bike lanes within the 50- foot right-of-way of both collectors. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommend adoption of the applicant's language as follows: The applicant will coordinate with ACRD on bike lane striping. However, in the past ACHD has not always agreed with the City on bike lane striping. Therefore, if ACHD determines that bike lane striping is not necessary or preferable at this location, this recommendation should be ignored. 13. Applicant should clarify that Lot 9, Block 1, Lot 17, Block 7, Lots 18 and 35, Block 10 and Lot 40, Bloclc 7 are all intended as dual purpose micropath/utility corridors. 14. As a condition of the plat, Applicant shall be required to construct a minimum 10-foot wide asphalt path, open-vision fencing or four-foot- high solid fencing (maximum) along both sides of any micropaths, and install bollards at both ends to discourage vehicular access. The developer shall place a deed restriction on the residential lots adjacent to these micropaths to prohibit the construction of any fencing on the residential lot higher than four feet on the sides adjacent to the micropath lot. 15. Applicant shall show all existing permanent and temporary sanitary sewer construction easements on the preliminary plat map. No lots shall be allowed to encroach within any permanent sanitary sewer easement, and no lot improvements shall be allowed to encroach within the temporary construction easement until such time as construction is complete and the temporary easement is released per the terms of the easement. 16. Per City Ordinance 12-4-13, the Finch Sub-Drain must be piped. Applicant shall revise plat to show existing easements for the Finch Sub- Drain. If Applicant proposes lots to encroach within the sub-drain easement, provide a copy of the executed encroachment agreement with RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 5 PRELIMINARY PLAT -SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION - G.L. VOIGT appropriate irrigation district, indicating how the land underlying these easements may be used and showing approval for the P.I. lines to be within the easement, prior to signature on the final plat. 17. Applicant has requested a block length variance for Block 10 as part of their application. The maximum. 1,000 feet length would not be exceeded with the incorporation of the micropath lots 18 and 35, Bloclc 10. The Planning and Zoning Commission would support the requested variance if these lots are constructed and usable as micropaths to break- up the block length. 18. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends the west terminus of W. Wolf Point Court be choked down in its design below the 50-foot width proposed to encourage a slower vehicular approach to the future office park.. 19. If additional non-encroachable easement width is required by ACHD beyond the boundaries of the dual purpose micropath/drainage/sewer lots (currently shown as 20 feet), then the buildable lot boundaries shall be relocated to the non-encroachable easement line in order to meet minimum lot frontage. The minimum lot frontage of the buildable lots adjacent to these dual purpose lots may be reduced below that as allowed by ordinance if ACHD requires additional easement width. 20. Although Lots 21 and 22, Bloclc 7 and Lots 36-39 and Lots 42-44, Bloclc 10 meet minimum frontage requirements, the Planning and Zoning Commission is concerned about the usable width of these lots. For example, Lot 22, Bloclc 7 would only allow a house with an overall width of 43 feet to be built when applicable building setbacks are applied. 21. Add the Right to Farm note to the plat. The Planning and Zoning Commission further recommend: 22. Applicant shall comply with ACHD striping requirements. 23. Applicant must obtain a letter from the Meridian School District stating that the School District approves the preliminary plat of this application and that there are adequate schools for this project. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 6 PRELIMINARY PLAT -SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION - G.L. VOIGT 24. This Recommendation for approval shall not be construed as a guarantee for sewer services, and that by proceeding forward, the developer is assuming the risk of non-serviceability, and that no other methods of sewer service will be considered. Adopt the Recommendations of the Meridian Fire Department as follows: 25. Applicants shall satisfy all fire code requirements including those pertaining to water flow and fire hydrants. 26. Common areas will need to be kept clean of trash and weeds. 2 7. No parking of vehicles or trailers in cul-de-sac. Adopt the Recommendations of the Central District Health Department as follows: 28. The Applicant's central sewage and central water plans must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality. 29. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. 30. stormwater shall be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality. 31. The Engineers and architects involved with the design of the subject project shall obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that prevents groundwater and surface water degradation. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District (ACRD) as follows: 32. Applicant shall dedicate 48-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Ustick Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. 33. Applicant shall dedicate 48-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Meridian Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 7 PRELIMINARY PLAT -SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION - G.L. VOIGT n ,~-. subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. 34. Applicant shall construct the main entrance off Usticlc Road, located approximately 900-feet east of the west property line, as proposed. Construct the main entrance with one inbound segment 21-feet, and construct the outbound segment with two lanes, approximately 29-feet wide. The median shall be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide to total a minimum of a 100-square foot area. The applicant shall be required to dedicate sufficient right-of-way for the street section plus the additional width of the median. 35. Applicant shall construct a center turn lane on Usticlc Road for the main entrance/Usticlc Road intersection. Provide a minimum of 100-feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the. turn lane with District staff. 36. Applicant shall construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Usticlc Road located two-feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. 37. Applicant shall construct a 24 to 30-foot wide driveway on Usticlc Road, located 420-feet east of Meridian Road. Pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Usticlc Road and install pavement tapers with 15-foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. 38. Construct the main entrance off Meridian Road, located approximately 1,300-feet north of the south property line, as proposed. Verify that the entrance is offset a minimum of 125-feet from the proposed main entrance to Cedar Springs Subdivision on the west side of Meridian Road. Design the main entrance with a 21-foot street section for the inbound segment and construct the outbound segment with two lanes, approximately 29-feet wide. The median shall be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide to total a minimum of a 100-square foot area. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way for the street section plus the additional width of the median. 39. Applicant shall construct a center turn lane on Meridian Road for the main entrance/Meridian Road intersection to provide a minimum of 100-feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 8 PRELIMINARY PLAT -SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION - G.L. VOIGT departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. 40. Applicant shall construct a 24 to 30-foot wide driveway on Meridian Road, located 440-feet north of Ustick Road. Pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Meridian Road and install pavement tapers with 15-foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. 41. Applicant shall construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road located two-feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. 42. Broadwater Way shall be designated as a residential collector street with no front-on housing, because the anticipated traffic volumes will exceed 1,000 vehicle trips per day. The access restrictions for these street segments shall be stated on the final plat. District policy requires that these street segments be constructed as 36-foot street sections with curb, gutter and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks. Parking shall be prohibited on these street segments. Coordinate the signage plan with District staff. 43. Unless otherwise approved, construct all public roads within the subdivision as 36-foot street sections with curb, gutter, and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks within 50-feet of right-of-way. 44. Applicant shall construct the turnarounds to provide a minimum turning radius of 45-feet. 45. Applicant shall construct a stub street to the north property line between Lot 22, Block 1, and Lot 1, Block 5 as proposed. A paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub street is not required. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with District staff. 46. Applicant shall construct a stub street to the east property line between Lot 13, Block 5, and Lot 48, Bloclc 10 as proposed. A paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub street is not required. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with District staff. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 9 PRELIMINARY PLAT -SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION - G.L. VOIGT 47. Applicant shall provide a $30,000 deposit to the Public Rights-of-Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing one-quarter of the traffic signal at the intersection of Usticlc Road and Meridian Road. 48. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat shall be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this shall be required on the final plat. 49. Applicant shall relocate any irrigation facilities or utilities outside of the new right-of-way on Usticlc Road or Meridian Road. 50. Except for one approved driveway on Usticlc Road, and one approved driveway on Meridian Road, direct lot or parcel access to Usticlc Road or Meridian Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Recommendations\PP020Sundance.wpd RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 10 PRELIMINARY PLAT -SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION - G.L. VOIGT March 16, 2001 P P 00-020 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING March 20, 2001 APPLICANT G.L. Voigt Development ITEM NO. 13 REQUEST Public Hearing - PP approval of 214 SFD lots, 4 future office lots and 23 common lots on 69.79 acres for proposed Sundance Subdivision -NEC of Ustick and Meridian Roads AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See P >~ Z Item Packet CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: n,~ ~ ~ ~ ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY ~ h'' CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH : /~' V NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: Contacted: ~~ ('C ~ ~ i~C~ Lw (' ~,~ .'°, __, ~~~. Date: ~~ ! C~ Phone: t ~j ~~ ~J~~ L;~j-- Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ~~~or~ ~~ ~I,~v°~v'Iav'~ ~v'v ~Oav~Ia~r~ eOMMI~~IO~r ICY' T~t~ M~TT~r O~ ~~ ) r~~v~~T ~Or ) ~r~I,IMIJV°~r~ ~I,~T nor ) ~v~-v~av°e~ ) ~ UB'DIV'I~IO~V', ) ~.L. VOLT ) 'D~V'~LO~`MFxN'~', ) ~Ipplicant ease ~v°o. ~~-0®-®2® r~eoMM~rrv~.Tlo~v' To CITE Coe~relL :_ 1. MAR 16 2001 1. The property is approximately 69.79 acres in size and is generally located at the northeast corner o~ Ustick Load and Meridian road in Meridian, Idah®. ~. The owner o~ record o~ the subject property is the Mc~irney ~'roperty Trust o~ fan dose, California. 3. The ~ipplicant is ~.L. V'oigt `be~elopment o~ Idaho falls, Idaho. ~. The subject property is currently zoned r=~. J-fowe~er> ~Iaere is an apptiICa~ion before the City Council for annexation and zoning to r-8 Medium `Density residential. 'I~te zoning o~ r-8 is defined ve1ithin the City of Meridian's honing and `beec'elopment Ordinance section 7Y-7-2. 5. The subject property is within the city limits o~ the City o~ Meridian. 6. The entire parcel o~ the property is included within the Meridian Urban ~er~ice Manning area as the t9rban ~er~ice Manning ~Irea is de~fned in the Meridian Comprehensive flan. 7. The ~4pplicant proposes to develop the subject property in the '~®llou,ing manner: ~1~ single family lots, 23 common lots and ~ office lots for a residential subdivision. r~COMMFxN'D~lTIO~V° TO CITE COUdV°CIL - 2 ~l{~LIMIrN~Ir~' ~L~T -~UJY''D~L.NC~ ~UB'DTVI~IOJV' - ~.I,. v'OI~T ~~-, ~. "Mere are no significant or seenic features o~ mayor importanee that affect the eonsideration o~ this application. ~~eo~~~av°v~IT~osr 1. The `I+~eridian Manning and honing Commission hereby recommends to the City Council o~ the City o~ `ivteridian that they approve the preliminary plat as requested by the ~fpplicant for the property described in the application, sub~ec~t to the ~olTowing: adopt the Manning and honing administrator and assistant City ~ngiraeer I{ ecommendations as follows: 7. applicant shall obtain ~ letter from the ada County street ~!°ame Comriaittee, approving the subdivision and street names. 2. applicant shall coordinate dire hydrant placement with the City o~ meridian ~ublie Works 'Department. 3. unitary sewer service to this development will have to be prodded by the future tiVhite ^~runk fewer, whieh is being designed at this time. The gunk alignment/construetion is totally dependent on whether or not the subdivision layout o~ the future ~ridgetower subdivision on the east side ®~ 'den `File, north o~ Ustick, is satis~aetory to the city, acv, the irrigation district and Other agencies, and that the appropriate easements can be obtained. I~ this future phase o~ ~ridgetower is approved (which has not even been submitted to the City yet), the ~ublie tnlorks `Department would probably proceed with surveying and easements procurement along the proposed route. approximately 3 to ~ months of design time, followed by ~ or so months o~ construction is expected. The ~ublie tiVorks `Department anticipates the trunk being completed by the end o~ 2~~1, assuming a relatively smooth approval process. ~inee the Bridgetower subdivision layout is so critical to the future tiVhite gunk, and given the City has not received a formal application on the subdivision yet, the Manning and honing Commission feels strongly that it would be premature to annex the proposed ~undance subdivision until the White gunk alignment is better known and easements have been obtained by the City. This proposed development cannot be provided sanitary sewer service by gravity into any existing city sewer system. tiVhen sewer is available, applicant will be responsible to construct sewer I~~co~m~~v-va~IO~r ~o eIT~ eov~rclL - 3 ~'1{LLIMIJ~fa.l{~ ~L~i~ -~U~(''D~NCE ~UB'DIV"I~IO~V' - ~.L. V'©ICT'~ mains to and through this proposed development. subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routltag with the ~'ublic tiVorks `Department. fewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer trines on the south and west sides o~ the centerline. ~. Water service to this development shall be via extensions from the existing main in Ustick 1{oad adjacent to the proposed subdivision. ~{pplicant will be responsible to construct water mains to and through this proposed development. subdivision designer shall coordinate main sizing and routing with the ~ubllc Works `Department. 5. Underground pressurized irrigation must be provided to all Landscape areas on site. `Due to the Landscape area, primary water supply connection to the Cry's mains w~l not be allowed. ~{pplicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. Applicant has not indicated whether the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and maintained by an association or the JV°ampa ~ `Meridian Irrigation District. I~ the system is being proposed as ~ private system, plans and specifications for the irrigation system shall be reviewed by the ~ubLlc Works Department as part o~ the development plan review process, and ~ draft copy o~ the pressurized irrigation system O~`M manual must be submitted prior to plan approval. 6. A detailed Landscape plan for the common areas, including fencing locations and details, pathways and types o~ construction, shall be submitted for review and approval with the submittal o~ the ~mal plat application. T`he plan must include sizes grad species o~ trees, shrubs, berming/swale details, and all proposed ground coyer/treatment. ~V°o ~encing will be permitted within the required Landscape buffers. A Letter o~ credit or cash surety Ira the amount o~ 77~~ will be required for aLL ~encing, Landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final Lat. perimeter fencing shall be instai~ed prior to obtalrairag building permits. Z. As shown on the plat, the Ustick Load landscape buffer shall be ~ minimum o~ 3(~-feet in width beyond the required ACJ~D right-o~way and constructed by the developer as a condition o~ the plat. ate meridian road Landscape buffer shall be increased to 35 feet to meet the minimum buffer width along entryway corridors. The Landscape buffers shall be placed in common separate Lots (as shown). fencing is not to encroach upon these buffers. ~. ~~-hoot--high, solid, perir~aeter fencing shall be required along the dull northern and eastern boundaries of the subdivision. ~{pplicant shad submit detailed fencing plans for review and approval with submittal o~ the Final Lat. ALL required ~eneing is to be in pl~ee prior to Issuance ®~ building permits. ~ letter o~ credit or cash will be required for these fences prior to signature on the final plat. 1~~C0~[`N[F~.NDA~IOJV° '~'O CI'>~'~ COUSI'CIL - ~ ~'I{~LI`I~Id~f~41{~' ~I.~L`~ -~UdV''D~fdV'C~ ~U~'llIVI~IOJ+f - ~.L. VOI~'>' ~. Lot ~, Block ~ (pocket park lot) shall be designed to present accumulated water from standing for periods longer than ~ hours. rI~he maximum side slope o~ this storm drainage lot shall be ~:7 and it shall be planted with grass. 7®. 7~he soils irx~estigation report submitted with the application indicates that additional monitoring was to be conducted through ®ctober 75, 2(~b(~ within the project site. 'Design engineer to provide the `public works `Department with results o~ the additional monitoring, and ~ statement o~ compliance which certil~es that the centerline Amish grade o~ the streets, public or private, is at lust three ~:et abcn~e the established normal ground water elevation, prior to the approval o~ development plans. '1~ais is an effort to ensure that the building footings are at lust one foot above the highest groundwater elevation. 77. ~s residential Collectors, the ~lann~ag and honing Commission recommends that ~V°. Broadwater and ~. great ells street be constructed with detached sidewalks (parkway design) from their point o~ access on to N[eridian road and Ustick road the dull length o~ the 2b-foot wide I~ndscape buffers. 72. City ~lyditaance 12-~-12 states, `Bicycle and pedestrian pathways shall be encouraged within new der9elopments as part o~ the public right of way or as separate easements so that an alternate transportation system (which is distinct and separate from the automobiles) can be prot'ided throughout the City urban sert'ice planning area." since no front-on housing is permitted Tong ~V°. Broadwater and ~7. great Falls street (as residential Collectors), Manning and honing Commission recommends ~Ipplicant coordinate with ~LC~-f`D to prr~ide bike lanes within the 5b-foot right-o~-vv~y o~ both collectors. 'I~te Manning and honing Commission recommend adoption o~ the applicant's language as follows: 'ate applicant will coordinate with ~I.Cj~f'D on bike lane striping. J-Powever, in the past ~{CJ-i'D has not always agreed with the City on bike lane striping. fi~erefore, i~ ~LCj-L'D determines that bike lane striping is not necessary or preferable at this location, this recommendation should be ignored. 73. Applicant should clarify that Lot ~J, dock 1, Lot 7Z, Block Z, Lots 78 and 35, Block 1c7 and Lot ~(~, Block Z are all intended as dual purpose micropath/utility corridors. 7~. GIs a condition of the plat, ~{pplicant shall be required to construct a minimum lb-foot wide asphalt path, Open-~ISIOn fencing or Our-foot-high solid ~eneing (maximum) along both sides o~ any micropaths, and install bollards at both ends to discourage vehicular access. ~f'te developer shall place a deed restriction on the residential lots adjacent to these micropaths to prohibit the construction o~ any ~;ncing on the residential lot higher than four feet on the sides adjacent to the micropath lot. r~co~~~rrv~~io~r ~o CIS Cov~v°eIL - ~ ~r~LI`1~I~V'~fr~ ~L~I'>' -~USI''D~1'C~ ~iU~'DIV'I~IOJV' - ~.L. V'OI~~ 15. ~Ipplic~nt shill show ill existing perna~nent end temporary s~nit~ry sewer construction easements on the preliminary plat map. ~V°o lots sh~~ be allowed to encroach within any perm~raent s~nit~ry sewer easement, end no lot inapro~ements shill be allowed to encroach within the temporary construction easement until such time ~s construction is complete end the temporary easement is released per the terms o~ the easement. 76. der City C?rdin~nce 72-~-13, the Finch dub-`Drain must be piped. ~Ipplic~nt shill revise plat to shout' existting easements for the Finch dub-`Drain. I~ ~Ipplic~rat proposes lots to enc roach v~ith3n the sub-drain easement, provide ~ copy o~ the executed enc-~o~chment agreement with ~ppropri~te irrigation district, indic~titag how the lend underlying these easements may be used end showing ~ppro~al for the ~.I. lines to be within the e~ssement, prior to signature on the ~m~l plat. 1Z. ~fpplic~rat his requested ~ block length ~~ri~nce for dock `lb ~s pert o~ their ~pplic~tion. The maximum 7,(~(~(~ feet length would not be exceeded with the incorporation o~ the microp~th lots 18 end 35, Block 1~. The ~l~nning end honing Commission would support the requested ~~ri~nce i~ these lots are constructed end usable ~s microp~ths to break-up the block length. 78. The ~I~nning end honing Commission recommends the west terminus o~ tiV. ~ol~ point Court be choked down in its design below the 5(7-foot width proposed to encourage ~ slower ~ehicul~r ~ppro~ch to the future office perk.. 79. I~ ~ddition~l non-encro~ch~ble easement width is required by ~f.C~`D beyond the boundaries o~ the duel purpose microp~th/dr~inage/sewer lots (currently shown as ~c~ feet), then the buildable lot boundaries shill be relocated to the non-encro~ch~ble easement line in order to meet mitaimum lot ~ront~ge. The minimum lot ~ront~ge o~ the buildable lots ~d~~cent to these duel purpose lots may be reduced below that ~s allowed by ordinance i~ ~ICJ-~'D requires additional easement width. ~~- although Lots ~I and 2,2, Block '~ and Lots 36-39 and Lots ~2-~~, Block 1~ meet minimum frontage requirements, the Manning and ~onirag Commission is concerned about the usable width o~ these lots. For exarraple, Lot 2.~, Block 7 would only allow ~ house-with an overall width of ~3 feet to be built when applicable building setbacks are applied. ~I. ~{dd the bight to Farm note to the plat. The Manning and honing Commission further recommend: 22. ~{pplicant shall comply with ICJ-~fi) striping requirements. I~~CO~t`M~v'v~iTYOdv' ~O CIT'~ COU~fCIL - 6 ~'I~ELI`I~IIJd°~1.1{~ ~L~IT -~UdV'`D~NC~ ~UB'DTVI~IO~V' - ~.L. VOI~'~ .-. 23. ~{pptiie~nt must obtain ~ letter from the `Nleridi~ra ~chooti district stating that the school `District approves the preliminary plat o~ this ~pplic~tion end that Mere ire ~dequ~te schools for this project. 2~. `dais I~ecommend~tion for ~pprov~l shill not be construed ~s ~ gu~r~ntee for sever sert'ices, end that by proceeding ~orv~~rd, the developer is assuming the risk o~ non-serviceability, and that no other methods o~ sever service will be considered. adopt the recommendations o~ the meridian Fire `Department as ~ollovs: 25. ~fpplicants shall satiny all fire code requirements including those pertaining to v~ater flow and Tire hydrants. 26. ~,ommon areas w~ need to be kept clean o~ trash and weeds. 27. JV°o parking o~ vehicles or trailers in cul-de-sac. ~.dopt the Recommendations o~ the central `District J-fe~~th `Department ~s ~ol~ovc9s: 28. tae ~{pplicant's central sewage and central water plans must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho `Department o~ health ~ tiVel~are, `Division ®~ ~tavironmental ~uallty. 29. I{ un-ofd is not to create ~ mosquito breeding problem. 3c~. ~tormwater shall be pretreated through ~ gassy wale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality. 37. 1~ae engineers and architects involved with the design o~ the sub~ec~t project shall obtain current best management practices for stormwater dispose and design a stormwater management system that prevents groundwater and surface water degradation. adopt the Recommendations o~ the ~.da County highway `District (~~J-~`D) as ~ollou%s: 32. ~Ipplicant shall dedicate ~8-feet o~ right-o~-vc~~y from the centerline o~ t9stick I~o~d abutting the parcel by means o~ recordation o~ ~ ~iraal subdivision plat or execution o~ ~ warranty deed prior to issuance o~ ~ building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. 33. ~Lpplicant shall dedicate ~8-feet o~ right-o~way from the centerline o~ `I`'Ieridian Road abutting the parcel by means o~ recordation o~ ~ ~iraal subdivision plat or execution o~ ~ warranty deed prior to issuance o~ ~ building permit (or other required permits), whichever oc~Ltrs first. R~eo~t~~.rrv~~toav ~o eI'~ eovsrely - 7 ~R~LI`I~iL~Y'~LR~ ~z,~i.~ -~vsrv~av°c~ ~U~'DIV'I~IO~V° - ~.I,. v'oI~'~ /'~ 3~. ~Ipptifc~rat sh~titi construct the mein entrance o~ Ustick I~o~d, tioc~ted ~pproxim~tetiy ~®(~-feet east o~ the west property trine, ~s proposed. Construct the m~fn entrance tivith one inbound segment ~1-feet, end construct the outbound segment with two Imes, ~pproxim~tetiy 2J-feet wide. 'the median sh~I~ be construed ~ mfnfmum o~ ~- ~eet vvfde to total ~ minimum o~ ~ 7b~-squ~e foot area. the ~pptiic~rat sh~I~ be requfred to dedicate su~ICfent right-off ~~y for the street seetfon plus the ~dditfon~ti vVfdth o~ the median. 35. ~Ipplicant shall construct ~ center turn lane on Ustick Load for the mafn entrance/Ustfck I{ o~d intersection. ~ro~ide ~ minimum o~ lb(~-feet o€ storage vc9ith shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design og the terra lane 1~fth `~IstrICt staff. 36. ~Ipplicant shall construct ~ 5-foot vc9ide concrete sidewalk on Ustfck 1{ oad located tvvo- ~eet vVfthfn the new right-o~tivay. Coordinate the location and ele~atfon o~ the sidewalk with `District stai'~. 3Z. ~lpplfcant shall construct ~ 2~4 to 3b-foot wide driveway on t9stick 1~oad, located ~2b- ~eet east o~ `N~eridian Load. ~a~e the driveway its dullwidth and at least 3(9-feet into the site beyond the edge o~ pavement o~ Ustiek I{ oad and install pavement tapers with 75-foot r~dfi abutting the existing ro~dw~y edge. 3~. Construct the maim entrance o~ `Meridian P~oad, located approximately 1,3~b-feet north o~ the south property line, as proposed. V'erf~y that the entrance fs offset ~ minimum o~ ~5-feet from the proposed main entrance to Cedar ~prmgs ~ubdi~ision on the west side o~ `Meridian I{ oad. °Desfgn the mam entrance vvfth ~ ~1-foot street section for the inbound segment and construct the outbound segment with tvvo Imes, approximately 2~J-feet vvfde. the median shall be constructed ~ minimum o~ ~-feet wide to total ~ minimum o~ ~ 7(~t~-square foot area. `Dedicate su~fcfent right-o~vvay for the street section plus the additional width o~ the median. 3J. ~Ipplfcant shall construct ~ center tuna lame on `Meridian Z~oad for the main entrance/`Meridian Load intersection to provide ~ minimum o~ 7~~-feet o~ storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design ®~ the terra lane with `District staff. ~~. ~{pplfcant shall construct ~ 2~ to 3t~-foot wide driveway on `Meridian I{ oad, located ~~(~-feet north o~ Ustiek Load. ~a~e the driveway its dull width and at least 3®-feet into the site beyond the edge o~ pavement o~ 6Merfdian load and frastall pavement tapers with 75-4oot radii ~buttfng the existing ro~dw~y edge. $~CO~`NIF,JV''D~l'~IOd~f '~O CI'A' COUJ~('CII, - 8 ~'1{19LI`MI~V°~.I~~' ~I,~L'~' -~U~('`D~NC~ ~UB`DIV'I~IOJY' - ~.I,. VOICJ~ n ~1. ~Ipplicant shall construct ~ 5-~oot wide concrete sidewalk on `Meridian Load looted tvno-feet vc'ithin the new right-o~way. Coordinate the location and elevation o~ the sfdewalk v~ith `Dfstrict staff. ~2. Broadwater ~Vay shall be designated as ~ residential collector street with no front-on housing, because the anticipated traffic volumes gill exceed 7,~b~ ,vehicle trips per day. 'I~2e access restrictions for these street segments shall be stated on the ~rnal plat. `District policy requires that these street segments be constructed as 36-foot street sections ,pith curb, gutter and 5-~oot wide concrete sidewalks. harking shall be prohibited on these street segments. Coordinate the sigraage plan -with `District staff. ~3. C9nless otherwise approved, construct all public roads vvfthfn the subdivision as 36-foot street sections vc'ith curb, gutter, and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks within 5ch-feet o~ right-o~-vnay. ~~. ~4pplicant shall construct the turnarounds to provide a minimum turning radius o~ ~5- ~eet. ~5. ~fpplicant shall construct a stub street to the north property line between Lot 2~, dock 7, and Lot 7, Block 5 as proposed. ~! payed temporary turnaround at the end o~ the stub street is not required. Install a sign at the terminus o~ the roadway stating that, "~'J-~I~ I~O~L`D WILL B~ F~X`~~N°`D~`D IrN '1~ ~U'~U13 L". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with `District staff. ~6. ~Ipplicant shall construct a stub street to the east property lfrae between Lot 73, Block 5, and Lot ~~, Block 70 as proposed. ~{ payed temporary turnaround at the end o~ the stub street is not required. Install a sign at the terminus o~ the roadway stating that, "~ ~I~ I~O~1`D tiVILL BL F~XX ~F~`DL`D LN° ~ ~U~UI~~". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street ~fth `District staff. ~'~. ~fpplicant shall provide a ~3l~,bb~ deposit to the public 1{fights-o~~7ay gust fund for the cost o4 constructing one-quarter o~ the traf'f~c signal at the fntersec~tion o~ Ustick Load and `Meridian Load. ~8. dray proposed landscape islands/medians vvithila the public right-o~vvay dedicated by this plat shall be owned and maintained by a homeovVners association. ~V°otes o~ this shall be required on the f'iraal plat. ~~. applicant shall relocate any irrigation facilities or utilities outside o~ the new right-of- vc,ay on Ustick load or ~eridfan Load. 5~. F~cept for one apprc~ed drf~eway on Ustick Load, and one approved driveway on `Meridian 1{oad, direct lot ®r parcel access to Ustick I{ oad or Meridian Load fs ~,~eo~M~M~rv~I~t®a~r `~o eI~ eo~~v°CIL - 9 ~I~~LI~LN~{i{~ ~L~!'~ -~ UJ~I''DaaV°CL ~ UB'DIV I~IO~V' - ~.L. V'OI~`~ prohibited. Isot ~eeess ~estric~ions, ~s required with this ~pptiie~ti®~a, sh~titi be stated ®~ the ~ira~l plat. Z:\Work\`M\`Meeidian\N[eridi~n 1536®`M,\$ecommendeGfor~s\~`$a20i;und~ncewpd I~~e®m~t~t~rrv~.~IOSr ~o eI~ eovav°eII, - x~ ~I{~LI`~II~i°~ll~~' ~I,~f.~ -~UdV'`D~IdV'C~ ~U`B`DIV'I~IOaV' - ~.L. V'OI~'~ ~-,, February 9, 2001 MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING P P 00-020 February 15, 2001 APPLICANT G.L. Voigt Development ITEM NO. 7 REQUEST Preliminary Plat approval for 214 single-family lots, 4 future office lots and 23 common lots on 69.79 acres for proposed Sundance Subdivision in a proposed R-8 zone -NEC of Ustick and Meridian Roads AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: SANITARY SERVICE: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: c~ ~~~ ~ ~~~' ~r~ ~~ ~a~ f'~ (~,~ ~~ ~~ OTHER: Contacted: ~~, Ci~~'Lf. L 1 ! Date: Z ~~ ~ i'' Phone: ~~~i r~C~C ~~ f COMMENTS See previous Item Packet See attached comments Materials presented at publ(c meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ~du ~ou~t~~~~w~~ ~~~t~~~t Judy Peavey-Derr, President 318 East 37th IJdVC oiver~s, vice rresiaent Garden City, Idaho 83714-6499 Marlyss Meyer, Secretary Phone (208) 387-6100 Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Fax (208) 387-6391 Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner E-mail: tellus@achd.ada.id.us November 17, 2000 TO: G.L. Voigt Development 1908 E Jennie Lee Dr. Idaho Falls, ID 83404 FROM: Christy Richardson, Principal Development Analyst Planning & Development C~. ~'6~Z~'e~~ SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat: 214 Lot Subdivision Road REcE'R'ED NOY 2 0 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN n/e/c Ustick Road/ Meridian On November 15,2000, the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District (hereafter called "District") took action on the preliminary Plat as stated on the attached staff report. In order that the Final Plat may be considered by the District for acceptance, the Developer shall cause the following applicable standard conditions to be satisfied prior to District certification and endorsement: 1. Drainage plans shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. 2. If public street improvements are required: Prior to any construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way, the following shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. a. Three complete sets of detailed street construction drawings prepared by an Idaho registered professional Engineer. b. Execute and Inspection Agreement between the Developer and the District together with initial payment deposit for inspection and/or testing services. c. Complete all street improvements to the satisfaction of the District, or execute a Surety Agreement between the Developer and the District to guarantee the completion of the construction of all required street improvements. 3. Furnish a copy of the Final Plat showing street names as approved by the Local Government Agency having such authority together with the payment of fee charged for the manufacturing and installation of all street signs. 2 4. If Public Right-of-Way Trust Fund deposit is required, make the deposit to the District in the form of cash or cashier's check for the amount specified by the District. 5. Furnish easements, agreements and all other datum or documents as required by the District. 6. Furnish Final Plat drawings together with the plat and plan review fees for District acceptance and endorsement. The final plat must contain the signed endorsement of the Owner and the Land Surveyor's certification. 7. All of the material must be submitted to District staff two-weeks prior to Commission review of the final plat. 8. Approval of the plat is valid for one year. The Commission will consider an extension of one year if requested within 15-days prior to the expiration date. Please contact me at (208) 387-6170, should you have any questions. Cc: Planning & Development Chron/File Planning & Development Services-City of Meridian Construction Services -John Edney Drainage- Chuck Rinaldi Bob McBirney McBirney Property Trust 1162 Bentoak Lane San Jose, CA 95129 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT Planning and Development Division Development Application Report Preliminary Plat -Sundance/MPP00-020/ n/e/c Ustick Road/Meridian Road 214-lots MAZ00-021 This application has been referred to ACHD by the City of Meridian for review and comment. Sundance is a 214-lot residential subdivision on 69.79-acres. The applicant is also proposing four office lots, and requesting a rezone from RT to R-8. The site is located at the northeast corner of Ustick Road and Meridian Road. This development is estimated to generate 2,390 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic study. Roads impacted by this development: Ustick Road Meridian Road ACHD Commission Date -November 15, 2000 - 7:00 p.m. Sundance.cmm Page 1 RT _` RT RT L-0 MERIDIAN CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY ~-0 R. RT R~ RT 1000 RT ,ice 0 1000 Feet RT RT ~ ~ • qp ' W l I I I I l l f ~/ /~ R R-1 BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. 1/2 MILE VICINITY MAP REVISION BRIGGS SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION „~ PORTION OFTHE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 31, T.4 N., R.IE., B.M., (208) 3449700 ADA COUNTY, 1DAH0 SHEET 10F1 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD DESIGN DRAFT SCALE DATE DWG. NO. BOISE, IDAHO 83705 gKg ~•~. t000• 08/29/00 0205 W205.APR ~~~ W ~~. H W a~ m 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 1 3 4 5 6 g 9 2 B C 1 B OC 5 10 7 12 W. HELE{IA STREET K ROAD W 11 <' 10 i 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 LO K 4 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 1 30 29 11 S 28 12 ~ 3 27 2 4 26 13 W. KALISPEL STREET 5 2S 7 6 5 4 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6 24 48 B C 1 B O 2 ;` 23 2 7m 47 B K 6 W. GREAT FALLS ST. ~ i 1 16 15 14 13 12 11 22 8 0 46 17 Z 9 m 21 9 8 7 2 18 45 OCK 7 3 2 1 10 20 440 11 5 4 3 , 5 11 19 43 U / ` 6 \ ' ~' ~ 6 ~ 12 18 ' 42 ro 12 \ ..~J" eta Da~ -- ` 4 ~I ! ! 13 ~'g~~ 1 10 1 1' 12 `~ BLOC i 9 7 13 41 ~ 14 7 9 8 8 1 RT 14 15 16 e 40 OG 8 2 39 1 cJ 3 W. SMOKE'Y FILL DRNE 1g 6 4 5 c 30 29 28 30 31 32 33 34 36 37 38 B oc 10 18 23 29 24 23 22 21 20 19 17 16 25 20 21 22 24 = a 28 15 19 Z W. WILD HORSE DRNE 25 26 4 27 3 5 g 7 8 14 r 2 B OC<11 g 13 49 47 37 36 35 34 33 < 15 14 13 12 11 10 12 i BLOCK 7 W. WOLF FONT GT. W N'~ PONT DR. 11 50 45 38 9 41 4 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 3 42 43 BL CI 10 -~ 1 ~~1 N p K ~ 0 S ~G RT B P C BDIVI STRASSER O FARMS ~ W.IULSPEL STREET ACRES MERIDIAN CITY LIMIT S ' ~ I I I I I `1 00 l~ ADDESON ST ~ 300 0 300 600 Fe t . ~G BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. 1" = 300' VICINITY MAP REVISION ~~~~ SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION BRIGGS „,~ PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 31, T.4N., R.IE., B.M., ~zoe~ 3aa-97oo ADA COUNTY, IDAHO sHEEr ToFt 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD DESIGN DRAFT SCALE DATE DWG. NO BOISE, IDAHO 83705 BKB 1" = 300' 08/29!00 . 0205 ~0205.APR Facts and Findings: A. GeneralInfonnation Owner - McBirney Property Trust Applicant - G.L. Voigt Development RT -Existing zoning R-8 -Requested zoning 69-79 -Acres 214 -Proposed residential lots 4 -Proposed office lots 23 -Common lots 2,390 -New vehicle trips per day 255 -Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) West Ada -Impact Fee Service Area Meridian -Impact Fee Assessment District Ustick Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 6,906 on 9-29-98 Better than C-Existing Level of Service Better than C-Existing plus project build-out Level of Service 1,650-feet of frontage 68-feet existing right-of--way (25-feet north from centerline) 96-feet required right-of--way (48-feet from centerline) Ustick Road is improved with two-lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. Meridian Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 4,245 on 7-12-00 Better than C-Existing Level of Service Better than C-Existing plus project build-out Level of Service 1,940-feet of frontage 50-feet existing right-of--way (25-feet from centerline) 96-feet required right-of--way (48-feet from centerline) Meridian Road is improved with two-lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. B. On October 30, 2000, the District Planning and Development staff inspected this site and evaluated the transportation system in the vicinity. On November 3, 2000, the staff met as the District's Technical Review Committee and reviewed the impacts of this proposed development Sundance.cnvn Paee 2 ~ .-. on the District's transportation system. The results of that analysis constitute the following Facts and Findings and recommended Site Specific Requirements. C. On October 25, 2000, the Commission reviewed and approved Cedar Springs, a 333-lot residential subdivision located at the northwest corner of Ustick Road and Meridian Road. D. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. E. The applicant is proposing to constrict the main entrance off Ustick Road, located approximately 900-feet east of the west property line, and 130-feet east of a private lane on the south side of Ustick Road. District policy requires streets to align or offset a minimum of 125-feet (measured centerline to centerline). The proposed location meets District policy. The main entrance should be designed with minimum 21-foot street sections on either side of a center median. The applicant is proposing two 40-foot sections. Staff recommends that the inbound section be reduced to a width of 21-feet, and construct the outbound segment with two lanes. The median should be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide to total a minimum of a 100-square foot area. The applicant will be required to dedicate sufficient right-of--way for the street section plus the additional width of the median. F. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Ustick Road for the main entrance/Ustick Road intersection. The turn lane should be constricted to provide a minimum of 100-feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. G. The applicant should be required to construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Ustick Road located two-feet within the new right-of--way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. H. The applicant is proposing to construct two driveways on .Ustick Road for the office lots, located 220-feet east of Meridian Road, and 420-feet east of Meridian Road. Although the traffic study submitted with this application did not indicate the Ustick Road/Meridian Road intersection being signalized in the near firture, the traffic study submitted for the Cedar Springs Subdivision indicated that there would be a wan-ant for a traffic signal by the year 2005. District policy requires driveways to offset a minimum of 220-feet from a signalized intersection for right- in/right-out, and 440-feet for frill access. The proposed offices are expected to generate only 330 vehicle trips per day. Staff recommends that the applicant construct one driveway on Ustick Road, located 420-feet east of Meridian Road, for a full access driveway. The applicant is proposing to construct the main entrance off Meridian Road, located approximately 1,300-feet north of the south property line. District policy requires streets to align or offset a minimum of 125-feet (measured centerline to centerline). The applicant should verify that the entrance is offset a minimum of 125-feet from the proposed main entrance to Cedar Springs Subdivision on the west side of Meridian Road. The main entrance should be designed with minimum 21-foot street sections on either side of a center median. The applicant is proposing two 30-foot sections. Staff recommends that the inbound section be reduced to a Sundance.cnun Page width of 21-feet, and construct the outbound segment with two lanes. The median should be constricted a minimum of 4-feet wide to total a minimum of a l 00-square foot area. The applicant will be required to dedicate sufficient right-of--way for the street section plus the additional width of the median. J. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Meridian Road for the main entrance/Meridian Road intersection. The turn lane should be constructed to provide a minimum of 100-feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. K. The applicant is proposing to construct two driveways on Meridian Road for the office lots, located 240-feet north of Ustick Road, and 440-feet north of Ustick Road. Although the traffic study submitted with this application did not indicate the Ustick Road/Meridian Road intersection being signalized in the near future, the traffic study submitted for the Cedar Springs Subdivision indicated that there would be a warrant for a traffic signal by the year 2005. District policy requires driveways to offset a minimum of 220-feet from a signalized intersection for right-in/right-out, and 440-feet for full access. The proposed offices are expected to generate only 330 vehicle trips per day. Staff recommends that the applicant construct one driveway on Meridian Road, located 440-feet north of Ustick Road, for a full access driveway. L. The applicant should be required to construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road located two-feet within the new right-of--way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. M. Broadwater Way should be designated as a residential collector street with no front-on housing, because the anticipated traffic volumes will exceed 1,000 vehicle trips per day. The access restrictions for these street segments should be stated on the final plat. District policy requires that these street segments be constructed as 36-foot street sections with curb, gutter and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks. Unless otherwise noted, parking should be prohibited on these street segments. Coordinate the signage plan with District staff. N. Unless otherwise approved, the applicant should be required to construct all public roads within the subdivision as 36-foot street sections with curb, gutter, and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks within 50-feet of right-of--way. O. The turnarounds should be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 45-feet. Sundance.cmm Pa~~e 4 P. The applicant is proposing to construct a shib street to the north property line between Lot 22, Block 1, and Lot 1, Block 5. District Staff supports location of the stub street. The applicant should not be required to provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub street because the stub is only one lot in depth. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with District staff. Abutting the north property line is a 10-foot wide strip of land that exists from Meridian Road beyond the east property line of this site. If this stub street is to be extended in the future, the 10- foot wide strip of land would have to be acquired. Q. The applicant is proposing to construct a stub street to the east property line between Lot 13, Block 5, and Lot 48, Block 10. District Staff supports location of the stub street. The applicant should not be required to provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub street because the stub is only one lot in depth. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with District staff. R. The traffic study submitted with the Cedar Springs Subdivision indicated that full build-out of that subdivision, and this subdivision, should occur by 2005, and that traffic at the Ustick Road/Meridian Road intersection will warrant a signal by the year 2005. A traffic signal will cost approximately $120,000. The southwest corner and the southeast corner have been developed. The northwest corner is vacant land, and the Commission has reviewed and approved a 333-lot residential subdivision. Full build-out of that subdivision, as well as the current application, is expected by 2005. Staff recommends that this applicant contribute one-quarter of the cost of a traffic signal, $30,000 to the Public Rights-of--Way Trust Fund. The District will also require the same deposit from the developer at the northwest corner. S. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of--way dedicated by this plat should be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this should be required on the final plat. T. Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with past action by the District the applicant should be required to pave the driveways their frill width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Ustick Road and Meridian Road and install pavement tapers with 15-foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. U. Any in•igation facilities or utilities should be relocated outside of the new right-of--way on Ustick Road or Meridian Road. V. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will be adequate to accommodate additional traffic generated by this proposed development with the requirements outlined within this report. Sundance.cmm Paae The following Site Specific Requirements and Standard Requirements must be met or provided for prior to ACHD approval of the final plat: Site SpeciiFic Requirements: Dedicate 48-feet ofright-of--way from the centerline of Ustick Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of--way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of--way dedicated as an addition to existing right- of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance # 193. 2. Dedicate 48-feet ofright-of--way from the centerline of Meridian Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of--way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of--way dedicated as an addition to existing right- of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance # 193. Construct the main entrance off Ustick Road, located approximately 900-feet east of the west property line, as proposed. Construct the main entrance with one inbound segment 21-feet, and construct the outbound segment with two lanes, approximately 29-feet wide. The median shall be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide to total a minimum of a 100-square foot area. The applicant shall be required to dedicate sufficient right-of--way for the street section plus the additional width of the median. 4. Construct a center turn lane on Ustick Road for the main entrance/Ustick Road intersection. Provide a minimum of 100-feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. Construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Ustick Road located two-feet within the new right-of--way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. 6. Construct a 24 to 30-foot wide driveway on Ustick Road, located 420-feet east of Meridian Road. Pave the driveway its hill width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Ustick Road and install pavement tapers with l 5-foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. Sundance.cmm Pa~~e 6 ~ ... 7. Construct the main entrance off Meridian Road, located approximately 1,300-feet north of the south property line, as proposed. Verify that the entrance is offset a minimum of 125-feet from the proposed main entrance to Cedar Springs Subdivision on the west side of Meridian Road. Design the main entrance with a 21-foot street section for the inbound segmentand construct the outbound segment with two lanes, approximately 29-feet wide. The median shall be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide to total a minimum of a 100-square foot area. Dedicate sufficient right-of--way for the street section plus the additional width of the median. 8. Construct a center turn lane on Meridian Road for the main entrance/Meridian Road intersection to provide a minimum of 100-feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. 9. Construct a 24 to 30-foot wide driveway on Meridian Road, located 440-feet north of Ustick Road. Pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Meridian Road and install pavement tapers with 15-foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. 10. Construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road located two-feet within the new right-of--way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. 1 1. Broadwater Way shall be designated as a residential collector street with no front-on housing, because the anticipated traffic volumes will exceed 1,000 vehicle trips per day. The access restrictions for these street segments shall be stated on the final plat. District policy requires that these street segments be constructed as 36-foot street sections with curb, gutter and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks. Parking shall be prohibited on these street segments. Coordinate the signage plan with District staff. 12. Unless otherwise approved, construct all public roads within the subdivision as 36-foot street sections with curb, gutter, and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks within 50-feet ofright-of--way. 13. Construct the turnarounds to provide a minimum turning radius of 45-feet. ]4. Construct a stub street to the north property line between Lot 22, Block 1, and Lot 1, Block 5 as proposed. A paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub street is not required. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with District staff. 15. Construct a shib street to the east property line between Lot 13, Block 5, and Lot 48, Block 10 as proposed. A paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub street is not required. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with District staff. 16. Provide a $30,000 deposit to the Public Rights-of--Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing one-quarter of the traffic signal at the intersection of Ustick Road and Meridian Road. Sundance.cmm Page 7 r~., .-. 17. Any proposed landscape islandshnedians within the public right-of--way dedicated by this plat shall be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this shall be required on the final plat. 18. Relocate any irrigation facilities or utilities outside of the new right-of--way on Ustick Road or Meridian Road. 19. Except for one approved driveway on Ustick Road, and one approved driveway on Meridian Road, direct lot or parcel access to Ustick Road or Meridian Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. Standard Requirements: A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity. The written request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for ACRD Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. After ACRD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its original decision The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. 3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building pem~it (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. Sundance.cmm Pa~~e Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of--way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACRD right-of--way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 8. No change in the ternls and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 9. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless awaiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusion of Law: ACRD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development Division at 387-6170. Submitted by: Commission Action: Planning and Development Staff November I5, 2000 Sundance.cmm Pa~~e 9 .ac.. ~ uy ~ ~~~. .,.... ....,.~, To: City Clerk At: 8884218 t ~ ~~~1 ~~~ ~ll/t~~J1/~EJ~?~~Illf~ /I~c ~1GU~R8 ! PLANt~iS 1 SIJIiVE1F~ORS . wy„ , Psebruary 13, 2001 airy of Meridiaa t~ttn: Brad Hawkins-Clark 3~ East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Poe: Sundance Subdivision (Preliminary Plat Requirements) acar Brad, The following are responses to the staff report dated November 9, 2000. ~~nne~tatioa & Zonlne-General Reaulrements: 1800 West Overland Road Boise, Idaho 83705 - 3142 Voice (208) 344-9700 Fax (208) 345-2950 stevea(~briggs-engineering. tom I The applicant will comply. Tho Finch Sub-Drain is located on the oast boundary of the project. The applicant intends to pipe-the portion of the drain lying adjacent to Ustick. However the area ot'the sub- : drain which lies on the east boundary pick up ground water from adjoining parcels. It was our in[en[ not W pipe that section of the drain. 2' The applicant will comply. 3' The applicant will comply. 4 The applicant will comply. Sa The applicant will comply. 6 The applicant will comply. 7 ~ The applicant will comply. 8. The applicant will comply. 9, The applicant will comply. Ahnexation Site_Specltlc 1Rcpulrcmcnts: I .~ The applicant will comply. 2. The applicant will comply. 3.? The applicant agrees and will comply. P~itninttrx Plat ifieaulrements: 1, The applicant will comply. 2. The applicant will comply. 3. Since the November 2000 staff report, progress has been made concerning the White Sewer Trunk (i.e., the submittal of Bridgetower Crossing, easement acquisition, sewer line priority). There has also ': been progress concerning the location of an Elernentgry School site within the Cedar Springs proposed i subdivision. We are aware that there has been an addendum that has been drafted by Planning and Zoning Staff that we believe is favotgblc to our development. At this time we have not yet received a copy of the addendum. At such time the addendum is received and rcviowed we will provide a modified comment to this item. 4. ` The applicant will comply. 5. The applicant will comply. The applicant intends to transfer ownership and maintenance of the pressurc irrigation system to Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District, (f the District will accept the system. 6. ~ The applicant will comply. 7.'; The applicant will comply. i CCD 1 C + I'a~ ~ C • ~ ~ ~ nnn nnn ~nr n nnn~ n, ucll~ uy. , cuu uuu vuu+, I c V' I J- V 1 G, J 71 I Y I~ ~~ rayc crc >~ The applicant will comlily. 9! The applicant will comply. liD. The applicant will comply. 11. The applicant will comply. I,,~. The applicant will coordinate with ACRD on bike lane stripping,. However, in the past ACHD has not always agreed with the City on bike lane stripping. Therefore, if ACHD determines that bike lane stripping is not necessary or preferable at this location, this recommendation should be ignored. 1~. The applictutt wilt comply. 1#. 'fhe applicant will comply. 1S. The applicant will comply. 15. tt was my understanding that drains sloughs and natural waterways wore e.~cempt from the tiling ! requirement, This was based on the functions of drains as collection points for sub-surface drainage. 17. 't'he applicant agrees. I .The applicant will comply. 1 ~. The applicant will comply. 2d. The lot configurations vary to allow a variety of home sizes and shapes. There are homes in developments, which are only 44 feet wide. Before a Onal plat is drafted, each lo[ is evaluated For sire and depth to assure the lots are buildahle based on applicable setbacks. 21. The applicant will comply. 2~. The applicant deferred this item in November, Therefore, the letter will be submitted on February 14, 2001. rrn +c +n~ ~c• ~1 ~1 -.nn nnn cnc~ nnrr ra^~ ~`-, November 9, 2000 P P-00-020 MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING November 14, 2000 APPLICANT G.L. Voight Development ITEM NO. 6 REQUEST Preliminary Plat approval of 214 single family lots, 4 future office lots, 23 common lots and 3.43 other lots on 69.79 for proposed Sundance Subdivision AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: See Attached CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: See Attached CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: See Attached CITY FIRE DEPT: See Attached CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: See Attached MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: See Attached MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: See Attached NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: ~,(~w~~,~ ~Z ~• INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: See attached from Sewer Dept. and Sanitary Service ~-. Contacted: /~ C~iy ~~/~~' Date: `~ 9 Phone: 7~~ J~~~ Materials presented at public meetings sha0 become property of the Cffy of Meridian. ~L~I'OR Rohert D. Comic cmr cot~clL ~,fEb~ERs Ron slndeison Keith Bird Tanutn deWeeid Cherie McCandless MEMORANDUM: To: From: Re: HUB OF TREASURE vAI.T,F.~' ''~ A Good Place to Ln-e ~ LITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 8364? (?AS) 888-~33 • FAY (?08) 887-813 Gry Qerk Office Fas (208) 888--F218 Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to Cit Engineer ~~- Brad Hawkins-Clark, Planner ~~~ LEG.~1I. DEP_~R1tifEI~"I' (-'.08) =88-Z#99 • Fze 288-?S01 PL-BL1c ~~ oR1~ BC'ILDL~G DEPART4fEi~,T (308) 887-~11 ~ Faac 887-1297 PL~'i~~tG Ai~ID ZO~~IING DEP.~R'I1 ~~1`I' (308) 884-5533 ~ FrLY 888-6854 November 9, 2000 ~~~~ y ~ ~/ p 9 Z000 CIS ~ ~1# eke~ffl~~ SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION - Request for Annexation and Zoning of 70.72 Acres from RUT (Ada County) to R-8 by G.L. Voigt Development (File #AZ-00-OZI) - Request for Preliminary Plat on 69.79 Acres for 214 Single Family Lots, 23 Common Lots & Four (4) Office Lots by G.L. Voigt Development for a Residential Subdivision in a Proposed R-8 Zone (File #PP-DO-020) We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATIONS SUMMARY The subject applications propose to annex and plat approximately 70 acres consisting of 214 single-family buildable lots and 23 common lots at a gross density of 3.15 dwelling units per acre. The Annexation application proposes an R-8 zone for the full 70.72 acres, although the four (4) proposed office lots at the SW corner would need to be rezoned in the future in order to accommodate an office use. Since the current Comprehensive Plan designates all of the subject parcel as Single Family Residential, no office or commercial zoning is permitted at this time. The Preliminary Plat includes a centrally located 2.5-acre pocket park and proposes one new access road onto both Meridian Road and Ustick Road. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North -Agricultural land and use with a single family residence, zoned RUT (Ada County) South - Eastbrook Village Subdivision, zoned R-8 in Ada County; four single family residences in Ada County, zoned R1 and RUT; Bedford Place Subdivision, zoned R-8 in Meridian. East - An 11-acre flag pazcel, zoned RUT (Ada County) with existing agricultural use; Weaver Acres Subdivision, zoned R1 (Ada County), with 22+, 1-acre lots. West -One single family residence at the NW corner of Meridian and Ustick; existing agricultural; proposed City Park, zoned Limited Office (Meridian); proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision north of City Park ground. AZ-00-021, PP-00-020 Sundance.az.pp ^_ Mayor, Council and P&~, November 9, 2000 Page 2 CURRENT OWNER OF RECORD The McBirney Property Trust, represented by Bob McBirney, is the current property owner and has submitted consent for both applications. ANNEXATION AND ZONING GENERAL COMMENTS Staff adopted the same general approach to review of the annexation and zoning of this property as the Cedar Springs application last month. Given their close geographic proximity, there are many similar issues between the two applications, the majority of which Staff feel do not meet the required findings to justify annexation at this time. Ordinance 11-15-11, General Standards Applicable to Zoning Amendments, states that both the P&Z Commission and Council are required "to review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment." In other words, there must be ample evidence supporting the necessity for the City to expand its annexed area before the Commission and/or Council approves an annexation request. Specifically, Ordinance 11-15-11 lists the following questions (shown in bold) that must be adequately answered for each property. Staff's analysis of each required finding is below each item (shown in italics): A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and, if not, has there been an application fora Comprehensive Plan amendment; There are several Comprehensive Plan policies that both support and do not support this proposed annexation. Since the preliminary plat was submitted with the annexation, Staff considered both the annexation request and the plat together in this analysis. Comprehensive Plan policies that support the annexation/plat are: • The subject property is designated as Single Family Residential on the Land Use Map of the current Comprehensive Plan. The Applicant is requesting an R-8 zone, which complies with the single family designation. • "Encourage new development...of higher-density development within the Old Town area and lower-density development in outlying areas. " (Land Use Chapter, 1.4I>) • "Encourage residential developments to provide adequate easements for future pathways. "(Transportation Chapter, 1.9U) • "Link residential neighborhoods, park areas and recreation facilities. " (Parks Chapter, 3.1. e.) • "Encourage landscaped setbacks for new development on entrance corridors. " (Community Design Chapter, 4.4U) Comprehensive Plan policies that do not su ort the annexation/plat are: • "School sites should be reserved for future acquisition in advance of development of planned land use. Approval of subdivision plats may be withheld if adequate school facilities or sites are not available to serve the proposed subdivision. " (Schools AZ-00-021, PP-00-020 Sundance.az.pp .-. Mayor, Council and P&~ November 9, 2000 Page 3 Chapter, 3.3). Staff has been informed that the developer of the proposed Cedar Springs Subdivision has been in discussion with the Meridian School District (MSD) about finding a mutually agreeable solution to the overcrowding problem in this area north of the City. The MSD has stated that they desire at least one (1), ten to twelve acre site for an elementary school in every Section (square mile). While Cedar Springs and Sundance are in d~erent Sections, it is d ffcult to determine school needs for these developments since MSD does not have a future site acquisitions map. Regardless of where MSD sites a school in this area (Section 31 or 36), the fact remains that this public service is not available at this time, especially for the projected number of children that 214 new homes would generate. • "Although it is recognized that urbanized development does exist within the rural areas of the Area of City Impact, the rural lands should be kept in agricultural production as long as possible until urban services (municipal sewer and water facilities and other essential services) can be provided" (Land Use Chapter, 6.3) While water service is available to the subject parcel, sanitary sewer and schools cannot be provided at this time. • "All development in the USPA shall be required to connect to the municipal sewer system. " (Public Services Chapter, S.S) This development is in the USPA but cannot be hooked-up to the municipal sewer system. The new White Drain Trunk is planned to serve this parcel but the City is not certain of when the trunk will reach this parcel or what the appropriate alignment of the trunk at this particular location will be. • "Police protection within the city limits...should be maintained according to the recommended service ratio of 1.6 to 1.8 police officers per 1, 000 persons. " (Public Services Chapter, 6.8) • "Housing proposals shall be phased with...public service and facility plans, which will maximize benefrts to the residents, minimize conflicts and provide atie-in between new residential areas and service needs. " (Housing Chapter, 1.6) • "Residential developments shall be phased in accordance with their connection to the municipal sewer system. " (Housing Chapter, 1.7) See above discussion of the White Drain Trunk. B. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that the area should be rezoned. For example, have the streets been widened, new railroad access been developed or planned or adjacent area being developed in a fashion similar to the proposed rezone area; The Parks Department has completed a master plan for the 56-acre park west of the subject parcel, so the City anticipates an imminent change of use in this general vicinity from the existing dominant agricultural uses. Rezoning of land in this area is feasible. A residential zone across Meridian Road from the park is also feasible and appropriate. AZ-00-021, PP-00-020 Sundance.az.pp Mayor, Council and P&Z November 9, 2000 Page 4 C. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; Staff recognizes that the "essential character of the area " will change in the near future and that the change will involve some form of residential development. As noted above, housing is certainly compatible with the park use. The requested R-8 zone is also compatible with the two R-8 zoned subdivisions immediately south of Ustick Road. The "existing character" of the land immediately east of this parcel is predominantly low residential (1 or less units per acre) and agricultural. The "intended character" of the general vicinity as shown in the current and draft Comprehensive Plans is for single family residential. D. Will the proposed uses not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; Single family housing would not be hazardous or disturbing to the future park users or to the rural residences to the east. The only possible disturbance may be with the agricultural uses to the north and east, which could be adequately addressed through the Right-to-Farm clause in Idaho State Code. E. Will the area be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed zoning amendment shall be able to provide adequately any of such services; Sewer Facilities: The Public Facilities Plan shows that the proposed subdivision would be sewered via the new White Drain Trunk. The Trunk alignment/construction is totally dependent on whether or not the subdivision layout of the future Bridgetower Subdivision on the east side of Ten Mile, north of Usticl~ is satisfactory to the City, ACHD, the irrigation district and other agencies. If this future phase of Bridgetower is approved (which has not even been submitted to the City yet), the Public Works Department would probably proceed with surveying and easements along the proposed route. Approximately 3 to 4 months of design time, followed by 6 or so months of construction is expected. The Public Works Department anticipates the trunk being completed by the end of 2001, assuming a relatively smooth approval process. Since the Bridgetower Subdivision layout is so critical to the future White Trunk, and given the City has not received a formal application on the subdivision yet, Staff feels it is pre-mature to annex the proposed Sundance Subdivision until the White Trunk alignment is better known and easements have been obtained by the City. This proposed development can 't be provided sanitary sewer service by gravity into any existing city sewer system. School Facilities: See discussion of school sites under Paragraph A above. AZ-00-021, PP-00-020 Sundance.az.pp Mayor, Council and P&~ November 9, 2000 Page 5 Roadway Ca achy: The Applicant's traffic study projects that, by 2005, the intersection at Meridian and Ustick Roads and at the main entry drives will be a Level of Service "A " or "B " at peak hour. However, the Cedar Springs traffic study projected a Level of Service "E" at the intersection. ACHD has determined that a signal may be warranted at this intersection by 2005 and is, therefore, requiring a $30, 000 deposit from both Cedar Springs and Sundance for this signal (which would cover half of the $120, D00 cost). Under this scenario, assuming a signal would be installed before ultimate build-out of both subdivisions, it is likely the roadway capacity will actually improve sooner with these subdivision contributions to the intersection signal. Fire and Emergencv Medical Services.• Policy 6.9U, pg. 42, of the Public Services Chapter, states "Maintain afive-minute or less response time goal to all fire, police, and medical emergencies within the City. "Staff questions if this goal can be achieved for paramedics originating from St. Luke 's Hospital or for the Fire Department until the Fire Department until the new substation on Ten Mile Road is constructed. F. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; The proposed subdivision would certainly not create any more additional requirements or demands to the City than other residential uses. The primary question is one of timing. Until the White Drain Trunk is constructed, sanitary sewer service is not available for this development. G. Will the area have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; Both the Applicant's traffic study and the ACHD staff report state that, with the addition of center turn lanes on Ustick and Meridian Roads and the intersection, the subdivision traffic can be accommodated on the road infrastructure. H. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance; and None foreseeable. I. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City of Meridian. (Ord. 592, 11-17-1992) A key question for the P&Z Commission and City Council to consider in reviewing this annexation request and others within the White Drain boundaries is one of timing. Is the City willing to annex and approve developments contingent upon planned services versus those that are readily available or imminently pending? Or is the Ciry's "best interest" AZ-00-021, PP-00-020 Sundance.az.pp .-. Mayor, Council and P&~ November 9, 2000 Page 6 better met by waiting until the future services are further along in the planning process and greater assurances can be given to all parties regarding construction timeframes, etc.? Finding "E" above lists several essential services that must be available or which the developer can provide at the time of annexation. While the White Trunk sewer, emergency services, and schools are Tanned to serve the subject parcel, the services are not currently available. Annexation Recommendation Arguments can be made on both sides regarding annexation of this pazcel. It meets the essential requirements of contiguity and is in the Urban Service Planning Area. It's important to point out that the above findings and policies carry different weight and should not be viewed solely on the basis of the number of policies that support or don't support. However, Staff's interpretation of the Land Use Planning Act, Comprehensive Plan policies and required findings of the Zoning & Development Ordinance is that the size and scope of this annexation request does not fulfill the intent of these guiding policies. There are too .many uncertainties related to the timing of the White Drain Trunk to serve this pazcel, the timing of MSD's future school site selection in this azea, the completion of the Ten Mile Fire Station and the improvement schedule of the City Park. The annexation should not be granted at this time. Should the Commission and/or Council choose to annex, Staff recommends that a cost benefit analysis be prepazed by the Applicant detailing the overall projected costs to the City to serve the new homes and how this subdivision benefits the community as a whole if it were annexed. (Comp Plan policy #1.9U of the Housing Chapter states that the City will consider areas for annexation when it is demonstrated through such studies that the City will benefit.) Should the Commission choose to recommend approval of the Annexation, the following comments and conditions shall apply to the Annexation and Preliminary Plat applications: ANNEXATION & ZONING -GENERAL REQUIREMENTS All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the pazcel shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Sections 11-13-4.C. and 12-5-2.M. AZ-00-021, PP-00-020 Sandance.az.pp ,•-~. Mayor, Council and P&~ ~-. November 9, 2000 Page 7 4. Two-hundred-fi$y- and 100-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas in the proposed future commercial lots. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on- site. 6. Off-street parking shall be provided in the proposed future commercial lots in accordance with the City ofMeridian Ordinance 11-13 for use ofproperty. 7. All signage in the proposed future commercial lots shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 8. Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.K. 9. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. ANNEXATION SITE SPECIFIC REQUIRMENTS 1. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City as a condition of annexation. 2. Due to the single-family uses abutting the boundaries of Lots 45, 47 and 49, Block 7 (proposed as future office use}, a minimum 20-foot planting strip, in accordance with City Ordinance 12-4-7.A., is required along the property lines of these three lots and shall be a condition attached to this property in the Development Agreement. 3. The Applicant has noted that Lots 45, 47, 49, and 50, Block 7, at the southwest corner of the development, are intended as future office lots. However, the current Comprehensive Plan does not support an office or commercial zoning. These lots may be annexed with an R-4 zone but shall be restricted from obtaining any building permits until the lots are formally rezoned to the L-O or other zone which allows office uses. Staff does support the concept of incorporating other uses besides residential as part of this development. PRELIMINARY PLAT REQUIREMENTS 1. Obtain a letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 2. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 3. Sanitary sewer service to this development will have to be provided by the future White AZ-00-021, PP-00-020 Sundance.az.pp ,.~. Mayor, Council and P&~ November 9, 2000 Page 8 Trunk Sewer, which is being designed at this time. The Trunk alignment/construction is totally dependent on whether or not the subdivision layout of the future Bridgetower Subdivision on the east side of Ten Mile, north of Ustick, is satisfactory to the City, ACRD, the irrigation district and other agencies, and that the appropriate easements can be obtained. If this future phase of Bridgetower is approved (which has not even been submitted to the City yet), the Public Works Department would probably proceed with surveying and easements procurement along the proposed route. Approximately 3 to 4 months of design time, followed by 6 or so months of construction is expected. The Public Works Department anticipates the trunk being completed by the end of 2001, assuming a relatively smooth approval process. Since the Bridgetower Subdivision layout is so critical to the future White Trunk, and given the City has not received a formal application on the subdivision yet, Staff feels strongly that it would bepre-mature to annex the proposed Sundance Subdivision until the White Trunk alignment is better known and easements have been obtained by the City. This proposed development can not be provided sanitary sewer service by gravity into any existing city sewer system. When sewer is available, applicant will be responsible to construct sewer mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline. 4. Water service to this development shall be via extensions from the existing main in Ustick Road adjacent to the proposed subdivision. Applicant will be responsible to construct water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. 5. Underground pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape azeas on site. Due to the landscape area, primary water supply connection to the City's mains will not be allowed. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. Applicant has not indicated whether the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and maintained by an association or the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. If the system is being proposed as a private system, plans and specifications for the irrigation system shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department as part of the development plan review process, and a draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system O&M manual must be submitted prior to plan approval. 6. A detailed landscape plan for the common areas, including fencing locations and details, pathways and types of construction, shall be submitted for review and approval with the submittal of the fmal plat application. The plan must include sizes and species of trees, shrubs, berming/swale details, and all proposed ground cover/treatment. No fencing will be permitted within the required landscape buffers. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the Final Plat. Perimeter fencing shall be installed prior to obtaining building permits. 7. As shown on the plat, the Ustick Road landscape buffer shall be a minimum of 30-feet in AZ-00-021, PP-00-020 Sundance.az.pp Mayor, Council and P&~ November 9, 2000 Page 9 width beyond the required ACRD right-of--way and constructed by the developer as a condition of the plat. The Meridian Road landscape buffer shall be increased to 35 feet to meet the minimum buffer width along entryway corridors. The landscape buffers shall be placed in common separate lots (as shown). Fencing is not to encroach upon these buffers. 8. Six-foot-high, solid, perimeter fencing shall be required along the full northern and eastern boundaries of the subdivision. Submit detailed fencing plans for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat. All required fencing is to be in place prior to issuance of building permits. A letter of credit or cash will be required for these fences prior to signature on the final plat. 9. Lot 4, Block 9 (pocket park lot) must be designed to prevent accumulated water from standing for periods longer than 24 hours. The maximum side slope of this storm drainage lot shall be 4:1 and it must be planted with grass. 10. The soils investigation report submitted with the application indicates that additional monitoring was to be conducted through October 15, 2000 within the project site. Design engineer to provide the Public Works Department with results of the additional monitoring, and a statement of compliance which certifies that the centerline finish grade of the streets, public or private, is at least three feet above the established normal ground water elevation, prior to the approval of development plans. This is an effort to ensure that the building footings aze at least one foot above the highest groundwater elevation. 11. As Residential Collectors, Staff recommends that N. Broadwater and W. Great Falls Street be constructed with detached sidewalks (pazkway design) from their point of access on to Meridian Road and Ustick Road the full length of the 20-foot wide landscape buffers. 12. City Ordinance 12-4-12 states, `Bicycle and pedestrian pathways shall be encouraged within new developments as part of the public right of way or as separate easements so that an alternate transportation system (which is distinct and separate from the automobiles) can be provided throughout the City urban service planning area." Since no front-on housing is permitted along N. Broadwater and W. Great Falls Street (as Residential Collectors), Staff recommends Applicant coordinate with ACRD to provide bike lanes within the 50-foot right-of--way of both collectors. 13. Applicant should clarify that Lot 9, Block 1, Lot 17, Block 7, Lots 18 and 35, Block 10 and Lot 40, Block 7 aze all intended as dual purpose micropath/utility corridors. 14. As a condition of the plat, Applicant shall be required to construct a minimum 10-foot wide asphalt path, open-vision fencing or four-foot-high solid fencing (maximum) along both sides of any micropaths, and install bollards at both ends to discourage .vehicular access. The developer shall place a deed restriction on the residential lots adjacent to AZ-00-021, PP-00-020 Sundance.az.pp Mayor, Council and P&~ November 9, 2000 Page 10 these micropaths to prohibit the construction of any fencing on the residential lot higher than four feet on the sides adjacent to the micropath lot. 15. Please show all existing permanent and temporary sanitary sewer construction easements on the preliminary plat map. No lots shall be allowed to encroach within any permanent sanitary sewer easement, and no lot improvements shall be allowed to encroach within the temporary construction easement until such time as construction is complete and the temporary easement is released per the terms of the easement. 16. Per City Ordinance 12-4-13, the Finch Sub-Drain must be piped. Please revise plat to show existing easements for the Finch Sub-Drain. If Applicant proposes lots to encroach within the sub-drain easement, provide a copy of the executed encroachment agreement with appropriate irrigation district, indicating how the land underlying these easements may be used and showing approval for the P.I. lines to be within the easement, prior to signature on the final plat. 17. Applicant has requested a block length variance for Block 10 as part of their application. The maximum 1,000 feet length would not be exceeded with the incorporation of the micropath lots 18 and 35, Block 10. Staff would support the requested variance if these lots are constructed and usable as micropaths to break-up the block length. 18. Staff recommends the west terminus of W. Wolf Point Court be choked down in its design below the 50-foot width proposed to encourage a slower vehicular approach to the future office park.. 19. If additional non-encroachable easement width is required by ACRD beyond the boundaries of the dual purpose micropath/drainage/sewer lots (currently shown as 20 feet), then the buildable lot boundaries shall be relocated to the non-encroachable easement line in order to meet minimum lot frontage. The minimum lot frontage of the buildable lots adjacent to these dual purpose lots may be reduced below that as allowed by ordinance if ACRD requires additional easement width. 20. Although Lots 21 and 22, Block 7 and Lots 36-39 and Lots 42-44, Block 10 meet minimum frontage requirements, Staff is concerned about the usable width of these lots. For example, Lot 22, Block 7 would only allow a house with an overall width of 43 feet to be built when applicable building setbacks are applied. 21. Add the Right to Farm note to the plat. 22. Please reply in writing to these comments by 12:OOpm on Monday, 11-13-00. AZ-00-021, PP-00-020 Sundance.az.pp .-v ,.~ KUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR LEGAL DEPARTMENT Robert D. Corrie A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN (tog, ,s8-2499 • Fax 288-2501 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PUBLIC WORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 Keith Bird Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT Cherie McCandless (208~q 3 • Fax 888-6854 ~~~~, . T~y~ a ~~~ TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT:r~~OJE'~TS~~ 'C! WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN '~'^~- ~: ~.~ ~: ~~~., To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: November 7, 2000 Transmittal Date: October 5, 2000 Hearing Date: November 14, 2000 File No.: PP 00-020 Request: Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 214 single-family lots, 4 future office lots, 23 common lots and 3 other lots on 69.79 acres for proposed Sundance Subdivision By: G.L. Voigt Development location of Property or Project: northeast corner of Ustick and Meridian Roads Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department Your Concise Remarks: City Planner Parks Department (Residei,,,o, r.,.,r,,,,a,,.,,,, ~,,,,, ~~ Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 ~~ ~h~~ ~ ~ w~~S: t .•. HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR LEGAL DEPARTMENT Robert D. Come A Good Place to Live (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT Cherie McCandless (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PR~:C~°~ ?1~.n~ WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ~ `~ _ ~ ~ .:~-~ia~. ~~'~~ , To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: Transmittal Date: October 5, 2000 File No.: PP 00-020 Request: Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 214 single-family lots, 4 future office lots, 23 common lots and 3 other lots on 69.79 acres for proposed Sundance Subdivision By: G.L. Voigt Development Location of Property or Project: northeast corner of Ustick and Meridian Roads Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department _~Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner PafkS Department (Residential Applications only) November 7, 2000 Hearing Date: November 14, 2000 Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 MAYOR Robert D. Corrie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tammy deWeerd Cherie McCandless HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-250f PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 387-2211 • Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-684 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Transmittal Date: File No.: PP 00-020 Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: November 7, 2000 October 5, 2000 Hearing Date: November 14, 2000 Request: Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 214 single-family lots, 4 future office lots, 23 common lots and 3 other lots on 69.79 acres for proposed Sundance Subdivision By: G.L. Voigt Development location of Property or Project: northeast corner of Ustick and Meridian Roads Sally Norton, P/Z Bill Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P2 Keith Borup, P/Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C C Water Department Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 ~C~~D ocr z 6 2000 CITY OF MERIDL4nr o c T 2 3 zooo Meridian City Water 5uperinterld~ CENTRAL CENTRti~ DISTRICT HEALTH DEPhr3TMENT •• DisTR~cT Return to: ~1"HEALTH Environmental Health Division ^ Boise DEPARTMENT ^ Eagle Rezone # Conditional Use # ~elimina /Final /Short Plat ~i~ L~ -0a-~ ~... _ ~~.Vc~.~+~.c_~ ~6~~f ~ row./ ^ Garden City ,,(Meridian ^ Kuna ^ ACZ ^ Star ^ 1. We have No Objections to this Proposal. ~ C T 2 ~ 2~0~ ,.. ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. Cam' o~ ME~~ ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data conceming the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ waste flow characteristics ^ or bedrock from original grade ^ other ^ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. ^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. ~8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ~`~~~` 111111 central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage ~entral water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of nvironmental Quality: central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines central water 10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store 14. ~~ ,~~e_ ~P. ~ .~~~~ ~o?'~~~~~~Z Date: ~/ ~?/~~~/ ~ /?~~vx~ ~.~ ~i!c p~~ ~~,~,~iawS Reviewed By: ~ ~-a!/~i ~,~ Review Sheet CDHD 9uU0 Acc CENTRAL •• DISTRICT ~THEALTH DEPARTMENT MAIN OFFICE ~ 707 N. ARMSTRONG PL. ~ 801SE, ID 83700-0825 ~ (209) 375-5211 • FAX 32' c5C0 'I'u prevent and treat disease and disability; to prunurte healthy li`estyles; and to protecf and pronrntc the health arrd grtality of oru- envirunnrcut. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that storm water be pre-treated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to ground water and surface water quality. The engineers and architects involved with the design of this project should obtain current best management practices for storm water disposal and design a storm water management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals that could be used for guidance are: State of Idaho Catalog of Stormwater Best Management Practices For Idaho Cities and Counties. Prepared by the Idaho Division of Environmental Quality, July 1997. Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook. Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department, January 1997. Serving Valley, Elmore, Boise, and Ada Counties Ada /Boise County Office 707 N Armsrong PI. Eo~se. ID 33704 Enviro. Health: 327-7499 Family Planning. 327-7400 Immunizotions' 327-7450 Senior Nuir.tion: 327-7460 WIC: 327-7488 FAX 327-8500 Ada-WIC Satellite Office 1606 Robert St. Boise, ID 83705 Ph. 334-3355 FAX: 334-3355 Elmore County Office 520 E. 8th Street N. Mountain Home, ID 83647 Enviro. Health: 587-9225 Family Health: 587-4407 WIC: 58 7-4409 FAX: 587-3521 Valley County Office 703 N. 1st Street P.O Box 1448 McCall, ID. 83638 Ph 634-7194 FAX 634-2174 ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ Preparing ZO Today's Students For n Tomorrow's Chollenges. o • ~° isP ~ °91e . Mer~a~o SUPERINTENDENT Christine H. Donnell October 25, 2000 Joint School District No. 2 911 Meridian Street • Meridian, Idaho 83642 • (208) 888-6701 • Fax (208) 888-6700 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Councilmen: R~cErv E ~ ~ ~ ~~~0 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE Enclosed for your review is general information relative to schools located in the proposed project area. If you have any questions, please contact Wendel Bigham at 888-6701. Reference: Sundance Subdivision Elementary School: River Valley Elementary School Middle School: Lowell Scott Middle School High School: Eagle High School Comments and/or Recommendations: River Valley Elementary School is over capacity. Lowell Scott Middle School is at capacity. Eagle High School is over capacity. At this point the school district is dealing with growth by providing portable classrooms. With the passage of the General Obligation Bond on September 19th a new high school will soon be under construction. We can predict that these homes, when completed, will house seventy three (73) elementary aged children, fifty two (52) middle school aged children, and forty nine (49) senior high aged students. Sincerely, Wendel Bigham, Supervisor of Facilities and Construction MAYOR ~~ HUB OF TRE~ISURE t/,4LLEY Robert D. Come A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT CITY COUN~ CITY OF MERIDIAN (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 iL MEMBERS PUBLIC WORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: November 7. 2000 Transmittal Date: October 5, 2000 Hearing Date: File No.: PP 00-020 November 14, 2000 Request: Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 214 single-family lots, 4 future office lots, 23 common lots and 3 other lots on 69.79 acres for proposed Sundance Subdivision By: G.L. Voigt Development t_ocation of Property or Project: northeast corner of Ustick and Meridian Roads Sally Norton, P1Z Bill Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro, P/Z Richard Hatcher, P/Z Keith Borup, P1Z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, C/C Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department X Sewer Department Sanitary Service Building Department Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) Gen - 26 PP/FP/PFP - 30 AZ - 27 Meridian School District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co. (FP/PP) U.S. West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FP/PP) Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department R,~CE~D N 0 V - 1 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN Your Concise Remarks: 11/03/2000 10:56 2088885052 SANITARY SERVICE PAGE 07 ~ ~ ~1~~'OR NUB OF TREASURE VALLEY Robtrt D. C~~rric A Good Place to Live LBG.~t, pEPART~IE~I' CITY COUNCIL ~1EMBERS CITY OF MERIDIAN- (=~~' ass-~~~~ .Fax 235.,51 Ran Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO PUBLIC WORKS BUlI.DING pEPAR'TtitENT Keuh Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (?08) sa~•221 t -Fax 2s?-1'_97 Tammy d:Weerd (203) 83S•4~133 -Fax (208) 837-x313 Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 8gg.a218 PLANNING AND ZONIN"G DEPAR7•~IEYT (203) 831.5533 • Fax 53S•G35~ TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Ha11 Attn: Will Berg, city Clerk, by; November 7, 2000 Transmittal Date: October 5, 2174Q Hearing Date: November 14, 2ggq File No.; PP 00-OZO Request: Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 214 single family lots, 4 future office lots. 23 common lots d By. an 3 other lots on 69.79 acres for ~.~.. yoigt Development Location of Property or Project osed Sundance Subdlvislon nortneast corner of Ustick and Meridian Roads _-__,._...._,_., ~auy Norton, P/Z Silt Nary, P/Z Thomas Barbeiro, P/2 Richard Hatcher, P/Z __ Keith Borup, P/z Robert Corrie, Mayor Ron Anderson, C/C Tammy deWeerd, C/C Keith Bird, CiC Cherie McCandless, C/C Water Department Sewer Department ____,~,- X Sanitary Service Building Department ,_~ Flre Department Police Department _.__ City Attorney City Engineer ___~~__~ Meridian SChoot District Meridian Post Office (FP/PP) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc, Central District Health Nampa Meridian Irrig, District Settlers Irrigation District Idaho Power Co, (FP/PP) U.S, West (FP/PP) Intermountain Gas (FPlPP) ________Ada County (Annexation) Idaho Transportation Department Your Concise Remarks: ~Z..o City Planner Parks Department (Residential Applications only) vcn • ?B PPrfPrPfP . a0 4Z - 27 R~c~'~D N 0 V - 3 2000 CITY OF 1VL~II~IA~r NOU 03 '00 10=05 2088885052 PArF c~~ ;'~ ~: 4; ~ `= ~; .. w ~ _. o ~: F.: ~;:; ~ _ P; F.` t K.. . ~~ ~; .. ff[~ t' f: .. t IY: rCl 1' (`~- r- ~r-, r` t- ~_ t:; s" ,.. €~: r= i ~:_ ~: -- h: ~- ;? 13 20 FEB 22, 2001 TEL IYO~ (2081 387-6391 #15951 PAGE 2i1a ~. ~ RECEIVED FEB 2 2 2001 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT Planning and Development Division Development Application Report Preliminary Plat -Cedar Springs n/w/c Meridian Road~'Ustick Road MAZ-00-019/IV1PP-00-018 REVISED CITY OF MERIDIAN Modification The application has been referred to ACHD by the City of Meridian for review and comment. Cedar Springs is a 268-lot residential subdivision on 99.8-acres. The site also includes one office lot and one elementary school site, and one possible multi-family or office/commercial site. The applicant is also requesting annexation into the City of Meridian and a rezone from RUT to R-4. The site is located generally north of Ustick Road on the west side of Meridian Road. This development is estimated to generate 4,168 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic study. On October 25, 2000, the ACHD Commission reviewed and approved Cedar Springs Subdivision, a 333-lot residential subdivision. The applicant has modified the site plan. The new plan has fewer residential lots, the addition of office/commercial lots, and a school site. Changes to this report have been made in bold. Roads impacted by this development: Meridian Road Ustick Road ACHD Commission Date -February 7, 2001 - 12:00 p.m. ~. cmm gage 1 FEB 22 '01 13 39 PAGE. 02 13 20 FEB 22, 2001 Facts and Findings: A. General Information TEL N0~ f2081 387-6391 #15951 PRGE~ 3f10 Owner -Leslie Family Trust/IVloore Family Trust Applicant -J.U.B. RUT -Existing zoning R-4 -Requested zoning 99.8 -Acres 268 -Proposed residential building lots 1 -Proposed office/commercial lot (Meridian Road) 1 -Proposed office/multi-family lot/commercial (Ustick Road) 1 -Proposed elementary school lot 2,566 -vehicle trips per day for single family lots 474 -vehicle trips per day for office/commercial lot (Meridian Road) 418 -vehicle trips per day for office/multi-family lot (Ustick Road) 710 -vehicle trips per day for elementary school site 4,168 -total vehicle trips per day North Ada -Impact Fee Service Area Meridian -Impact Fee Assessment District 255 -Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) Meridian Road Minor arterial wifli bike lane designation Traffic count of 4,156 on 8-2-00 Better than C-Existing Level of Service Better than C-Existing plus project build-out Level of Service 1,530-feet of frontage SO-feet existing right-of--way (25-feet from centerline) 96-feet required right-of--way (48-feet from centerline) Meridian Road is improved with two traffic lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. i J~ti ck Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 3,960 on 8-2-00 Better than C -Existing Level of Service Better than C -Existing plus project build-out Level of Service 460-feet of frontage 50-feet existing right-of--way (25-feet from centerline) 96-feet required right-of--way (48-feet from centerline) Ustick Road is improved with hvo traffic lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. B. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 2 FEB 22 '01 13 39 PAGE. 03 12 21 FEB 22, 2081 TEL N0~ C208) 387-6891 #15951 PAGE 4x10 ^ ~"` C. The applicant submitted a revised traffic study for tlus development. The results of the traffic study, and the key findings include: • The proposed project is a 268-lot single family subdivision located near the Ustick Road and Meridian Road intersection. The revised plan also has one office/commercial lot off Meridian Road, one office or multi-family lot (approximately 63 units) off Ustick Road, and an elementary school site. • The estimated build-out year for the subdivision is 200. • The trip generation is 4,168 vehicle trips per day, or 420 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. • The subdivision proposes one approach to Ustick Road, located west of Meridian Road, and two approaches on Meridian Road, both located north of Ustick Road. • All three proposed approaches have two outbound lanes: a left-turn lane and aright-turn lane. The left-turn movements will operate at LOS A for the three approaches. • The construction of left-turn bays on Ustick Road and Meridian Road for the three proposed subdivision approaches. • There are four stub streets proposed, tlu-ee to the north and one to the west. • The ADT on Ustick Road is 3,960 vehicles per day and 4,156 vehicles per day on Meridian Road, counts taken on August 2, 2000. • The Ustick/Meridian Road all-way stop control intersection is estimated to operate at LOS B. • With the estimated "background" traffic in year 2005, the UsticklMeridian Road all-way stop control intersection is estimated to operate at LOS C. • With the estimated "site" plus "background" traffic in the year 2005, the UsticklMeridian Road all-way stop control intersection is estimated to operate at LOS E. • The study predicts that the Minimum Vehicular Volume warrant will be met for a traffic signal at the Ustick/Meridian Road intersection when the proposed development reaches full build- out. • One internal street, Ashton Lane from Ashby Street to Meridian Road, is estimated to exceed 1,000 vehicles per day and is being designed as a collector street. D. Any existing or proposed irrigation facilities on Ustick Road and Meridian Road should be located outside of the new right-of--way. E. The applicant is proposing two main entrances on Meridian Road located 270-feet north of the south property line, and 300-feet south of the north property line. The proposed entrances are separated by over 800-feet and are located in conforniance with District policy. The roadway entrances should be designed with minimum 21-foot street sections on either side of a center median. The median should be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide to total a minimum of a 100-square foot area. The applicant is proposing to construct two outbound lanes and one inbound lane with a median, within 64-feet of right-of--way. F. The applicant should be required to construct center turn lanes on Meridian Road for the main entrance intersections. The turn lanes should be constructed to provide a minimum of 100-feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lanes with District staff. G. The applicant should be required to construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2-feet within the new right-of--way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 3 FEB 22 ' B1 13 ~ 40 po, ;~ ,~,, 1333 FEB 32, 3001 TEL N0~ C308) 387-6391 #15951 PR~E~ 510 H. The applicant is proposing one main entrance on Ustick Road located at the west property line. The proposed entrance is located in conformance with District policy, and the applicant should construct Venable Lane as one half of a 36-foot street section, plus 12-feet of additional pavement within 42- feet of right-of--way. The applicant is not proposing to construct a median at this entrance. I. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Ustick Road for the main entrance intersection. The turn lane should be constructed to provide a minimum of 100-feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. The applicant should be required to construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Ustick Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2-feet within the new right-of--way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. k. The applicant is proposing to construct a segment of Ashton Drive from Meridian Road to Ashby Drive as a residential collector street with no front-on housing, because the anticipated traffic volumes exceed 1,000 vehicle trips per day. District policy requires that this street segment be constructed as a 36-foot street section with curb, gutter and ~-foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58-feet of right-of--way. Parking should be prohibited on this street segment. Coordinate the signage plan with District staff. The access restrictions for this street segment should be stated on the final plat. L. The applicant is proposing to construct three stub streets to the north. The applicant should not be required to provide paved temporary turnarounds at the end of the stub streets because the stubs are less than 100-feet in length. The applicant should be required to install signs at the termini of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub streets with District staff. The proposed stub streets are located: • Behveen Lot 1, Block 15 and Lot 11, Block 18 • Between Lot 11, Block 15 and Lot 1, Block 13 • Between Lot 8, Block 13 and Lot 2, Block 10 M. The applicant is proposing to construct Ashton Lane to the west property line. The applicant should not be required to provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the street because the stub is less than 100-feet in length. Tlie applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with District staff: N. The applicant is proposing to develop one office/commercial lot on Meridian Road at the southwest corner of the intersection with the proposed southerly main entrance. The applicant is not proposing direct lot access to Meridian Road. One driveway is proposed off.~lshby Drive. The driveway should be located a minimum of 100-feet west of Meridian Road and constructed 24 to 30-feet wide. ACHD will review the office/corrunercial site as a separate application in the future. O. The applicant has proposed an office/commercial lot adjacent to Meridian Road and Ashby Lane. This segment of Ashby Lane should be constructed as a 40-foot street section within 58-feet of right- of-way. Parking should be prohibited on this street segment. Coordinate the signage plan with District staff. The access restrictions for this street segment should be stated on the final plat. Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 4 FEB 22 '81 13 41 PAGE.05 13 23 FEB 22, 2801 TEL N0~ (208) 387-6391 #15951 PAGE 6110 .1 P. The applicant is proposing to develop one office/commercial or multi-family lot on Ustick Road at the northeast corner of the intersection with the proposed main entrance to the subdivision. The applicant is not proposing direct lot access to Ustick Road. Driveways should be located a minimum of 100-feet north of Ustick Road and constructed 24 to 30-feet wide. ACHD will review the office/multi-family site as a separate application in the future. Q. The applicant's site plan indicates a proposed elementary school on Venable Lane located north of Ustick Road. ACHD will review the school site as a separate application in the future. R. Due to the volumes and types of vehicular uses on Venable Lane from Ustick Road to the school site, Venable Lane should be constructed as a local/commercial street. The applicant should construct Venable Lane from Ustick Road to the north property line of the school lot as one half of a 40-foot street section plus 12-feet of additional pavement, with curb, gutter and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk within 42-feet ofright-of--way. To the north of the school site Venable Lane should be constructed as a 36-foot street section. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of--way dedicated by this plat should be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this should be required on the final plat. T. The applicant should be required to construct all public roads within the subdivision as 36-foot street sections with curb, gutter, and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks within 50-feet ofright-of--way. U. The public streets within the subdivision should be located to align or offset a minimum of 125- feet(centerline to centerline). It appears that the street layout is in conformance with District policy. V. The turnarounds should be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 45-feet. W. The applicant's traffic study indicates that full build-out of the subdivision should occur by 2005, and that traffic at the Ustick Road; Meridian Road intersection will warrant a signal by the year 2005. A traffic signal will cost approximately $120,000. The southwest corner and the southeast corner have been developed. The northeast corner is vacant land, and staff has received a traffic study fora 215-lot residential subdivision with four office lots on corner. Full build-out of that subdivision is expected by 2005. Staff recommends that this applicant contribute one-quarter of the cost of a traffic signal, $30,000 to the Public Rights-of--Way Trust Fund. The District will also require the same deposit from the developer at the northeast corner. X. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will be adequate to accommodate additional traffic generated by this proposed development with the requirements outlined within this report. Special Recommendation to the City of Meridian: The City should require the applicant to provide pathways to the City Park site so that pedestrians to not have to access collector roadways for access into the park. Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 5 FEB 22 '01 13 42 pAr,F a~ 1323 FEB 22, 2001 TEL N0~ (308) 387-6391 #15951 PRGE~ 7110 The following Site Specific Requirements and Standard Requirements must be met or provided for prior to ACHD approval of the fmal plat: Site Specific Requirements: Dedicate 48-feet ofright-of--way from the centerline of Meridian Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of--way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #193. 2. Dedicate 48-feet ofright-of--way from the centerline of Ustick Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of--way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of--way dedicated as an addition to existing right-of--way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #193. Locate any existing or proposed irrigation facilities on Ustick Road and Meridian Road outside of the new right-of--way. 4. The two main entrances on Meridian Road located 270-feet north of the south property line, and 300-feet south of the north property line, are approved with this application. The entrances shall be designed with two outbound lanes and one inbound lane on either side of a center median, within 64-feet ofright-of--way. The median shall be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide to total a minimum of a 100-square foot area. Construct center turn lanes on Meridian Road for the main entrance intersections. The turn lanes shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 100-feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lanes with District staff. 6. Construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2- feet within the new right-of--way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. 7. Construct a center turn lane on Ustick Road for the main entrance intersection. The turn lane shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 100-feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff: Construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Ustick Road abutting the entire parcel, located 2-feet within the new right-of--way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff: Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 6 FEB 22 '01 13 43 PAGE. 07 13 24 FEB 22, 2001 TEL N0~ (208) 387-6391 #15951 PAGE 8110 ~ ~ 9. Construct a segment of Ashton Drive from Meridian Road to Ashby Drive as a residential collector street with no front-on housing. Construct the street as a 36-foot street section with curb, gutter and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58-feet of right-of--way. Parking shall be prohibited on this street segment. Coordinate the signage plan with District staff. The access restrictions for this street segment shall be stated on the final plat. 10. Construct the segment of Ashby Drive from Meridian Road to the west property line of the office/commercial lot as a 40-foot street section within 58-feet ofright-of--way. Parking shall be prohibited on this segment of Ashby Drive. Coordinate the signage plan with District staff. The access restrictions for this street segment shall be stated on the final plat. 11. Construct three stub streets to the north, located as proposed: • Between Lot 1, Block 15 and Lot 11, Block 18 • Between Lot 11, Block 15 and Lot 1, Block 13 • Between Lot 8, Block 13 and Lot 2, Block 10 Install signs at the termini of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub streets with District staff. 12. Construct Ashton Lane to the west property line, as proposed. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street with District staff, 13. One driveway on Ashby Drive shall be approved for the proposed office/commercial lot. The driveway shall be located a minimum of 100-feet west of Meridian Road and constructed 24 to 30- feet wide. ACHD will review the office/commercial site as a separate application in the future. 14. One driveway on Venable Lane shall be approved for the proposed office/commercial/mufti-family lot. Driveways shall be located a minimum of 100-feet north of Ustick Road and constructed 24 to 30-feet wide. ACRD will review the office/mufti-family site as a separate application in the future. 15. Construct Venable Lane at the west property line from Ustick Road to the north property line of the school lot as one half of a 40-foot street section plus 12-feet of additional pavement, with curb, gutter and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk within 42-feet ofright-of--way. To the north of the school site, construct Venable Lane one half of a 36-foot street section plus 12-feet of additional pavement within 42-feet of right-of--way. 16. ACHD will review the school site as a separate application in the future. 17. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat shall be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this should be required on the final plat. 18. Unless otherwise specified, construct all public roads within the subdivision as 36-foot street sections with curb, gutter, and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks within 50-feet ofright-of--way. Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 7 FEB 22 ' 81 13 ~ 43 PAr,F _ c,~ 13 25 FEB 22, 2001 TEL N0~ (208) 387-6391 #15951 PRGE~ 9x10 ~ ^, 19. The public streets within the subdivision shall be located to align or offset a minimum of 125- feet(centerline to centerline). 20. The turnarounds shall be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 45-feet. 21. Provide a $30,000 deposit to the Public Rights-of--Way Trust Fund for the cost of one-quarter of a traffic signal at the intersection of Ustick Road and Meridian Road. 22. Other than the proposed public streets, direct lot or parcel access to Ustick Road and Meridian Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. Standard Requirements: A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity The written request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for ACHD Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its original decision The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Conunission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff' approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 8 FEB 22 '81 13 44 PRGE.09 13 26 FEB 22, 2001 TEL NQ~ (208) 387-6391 #15951 PAGE 10/10 ,..., ~ 6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of--way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1580 at least t~vo full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of--way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 8. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusion of Law: ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development Division at 3 87-6170. Submitted bv: Planning and Development Staff Commission Action: February 7, 2001 Cedar Springs.rev.cmm Page 9 FEB 22 'B1 1345 PAGE. 10 TEL N0~ f208) 387-6391 #15951 PAGE 1/10 13 19 FEB 22, 2001 ~. ~-. Ada County Highway District 318 E. 3?th Street Boise, ID 83714 (208) 387-6100 (208) 387-6391 FAX Please Deliver to: City Clerk Fax #: 888-4218 Company: From: Christy Richardson Fax #: (208) 387-6391 Phone: (208} 387-6178 Pages: 10 Message: Here is another revised Cedar Springs report - the last one had some incorrect street names and designations. Please replace with this one - thanks! FFR ~~ 'G11 13:38 PAGE.01 RT RT 500 0 500 1000 Feet N RT MERIDIAN CITY LI BOUNDARY L-0 R1 USTICK ROAD RT R4 R1 RT BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. ANNEXATION VICINITY MAP REVISION ~"°'"E~"'° SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION BRIGGS PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 31, T.4N., R.lE., B.M., ~zos~ saa-s~oo ADA COUNTY, IDAHO SHEET 1 OF 1 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD DESIGN DRAFT SCALE DATE DWG.NO. BOISE, IDAHO 83705 BKB 1" = 500' 0812QY00 172(}5 ~'~~~5.APF The Idaho Statesman P.O. Box 40, Boise, Idaho 83707-0040 ;~ r,..~,_ _, _ -_.~ __, --. _ LEGAL ADVERTISING PROOF OF PUBLICATION`W"`" ~~_~-__~ _ _, Account # DTI# Identification Amount: 064514 392812 NOTICE OF HEARING $83.81 Ordered by: P.O. # Rate Run Dates SHARI STILES NT JANUARY 26, FEBRUARY 9, 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN Number of Lines 33 EAST IDAHO ST. 5 2 MERIDIAN, ID 83642 Affidavit Legal # 1 9397 JANICE HILDRETH, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That she is the Principal Clerk of The Idaho Statesman, a daily newspaper printed and published at Boise, Ada County, State of Idaho, and having a general circulation therein, and which said newspaper has been continuously and uninterruptedly published in said County during a period of twelve consecutive months prior to the first publication of the notice, a copy of which is attached hereto: that said notice was published in The Idaho Statesman, in conformity with Section 60-108, Idaho Code, as amended for: i ~~~ consecutive weeklysingle consecutive daily odd skip insertion(s) beginning with the issue of: JANUARY 2 6 2001 and ending with the issue of: FEBRUARY 9 2001 ~~ ~4 .~ STATE OF IDAHO ) )SS COUNTY OF ADA On this 9 day of FEBRUARY in the year of 2001 before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared before me Janice Hildreth known or identified to me to be the person whose name subscribed to the within instrument, and being by me first duly sworn, declared that the state- ments therein are true, and nowledged to me that she executed the ame. ~-~ Notary Public for Id o Residing at: Boise, Idaho /~ ~jt~ission expires: !~~ KK ~~ ll ~ '7l, ~i . . ~'UBLZG s~ O r~~'•9TF O F I~ A`~~. _ ~ y /~+, NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho at the hour of 7:00 p.m. on February 15, 2001, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of G.L. Voigt Development for Annexation and Zoning of 70.72 acres from RUT to R-8 for proposed Sundance Subdivision; Furthermore, the applicant requests Preliminary Plat approval of 214 single-family lots, 4 future office lots, 23 common lots on 69.79 acres also for proposed Sundance Subdivision in a proposed R-8 zone located on the northeast corner of East Ustick Road and North Meridian Road. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue, and is available for inspection during regular business hours, Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Oral testimony may be limited to three (3) minutes per person. Written testimony may be submitted seven (7) days prior to the above hearing date so that all interested parties may examine them prior to the hearing. DATED this 18th day of January, 2001. PUBLISH January 26th and February 9th, 2001 WIL~~,AI1AtG„Q~RG, JR., C ti~ s, 1~\ ~ A~~~~ "u'ly ~ ~~ T~^ s `'y/. y L k . L - i fiy" ~r t~ypp.' fit, t.~~ ~ .,. r \'° ~ ,... November 14, 2000 Meridian City Council Members 33 E. Idaho Street Meridian, 1D 83642 RE: Proposed Sundance Subdivision Dear Sir or Madam: Nry' j~r I-~~~f~ ~c~zvED N O V 1 4 2600 CITY OF MERIDIAN Our family has lived at 375 E. Usitick Road for 12 years. We have enjoyed living in Meridian and have witnessed tremendous growth. I am writing on behalf of our family over concern of the proposed Sundance Subdivision and four office buildings within that residential area proposed on 70 acres. 1 realize the children an= our future. Over the years I have seen the school system burst at the seams. With added subdivisions I have heard that the intent is more taxes will be paid allowing more schools, However, that never seems to happen fast enough while children suffer. I am concerned as to the quality of education the children who live in this area will receive due to lack of room and resources. li is sad that many kids in the Meridian School system tease that they are not people with names but numbers because they are overcrowded. To me that is not a laughing matter it is disgraceful that we have allowed the rapid growth without the resources to accommodate these children first. My second concern is traffic. With the other subdivisions that have been built in the square block around this site, traffic has increased dramatically. Many times we have to wait several minutes in order to drive out of our driveway onto Ustick Road. I understand it is in the long term plan to widen Ustick Road, but again, building is occurring before resources are provided. The last greatest concern I have is safety for our family and friends. From the small map it appears t iat the Ustick entrance/exit is directly across from ours and our neighbors homes. I also concerned about the safety of our children. Two weeks ago I witnessed a motorist who was driving behind a car that was waiting to turn into a subdivision on Ustick Road. The car coming behind the car was going too fast, which is common on this road, and.to avoid running into the rear of the car waiting to turn attempted to go around and landed in the borrow pit. That could be my front yard, where children play. I do not want that to even be a possibility. When it comes to enjoying where you live, I can't imagine how honible it would be to have lights shining into our bedroom windows time and time again If the council decides to go ahead and approve this subdivision despite the concerns of the citizens at least move the entrance/exit down the road where it is not directly in front of houses on Ustick Road. We are counting on you as Council Members to take the objections into consideration. The owners to my understanding do not even live in the state of Idaho let alone Meridian. They do not have concern for our city. The Hansen family and many others do, we are counting on the people who have authority to make the decisions to have the integrity to consider the thoughts and feeling of those living near this proposed site. Sincerely, ~ ~ ~ ~ "~ ~~ aq~~ ~~ Raquel Wonsan and family 710 960 I00 ~. 0b ~ 00 5--93 S(11d1S #QWO S~Jd 03S/NIW 3QOW Nd I Q I 2~3W d0 J,1 I 0 £IL89L£ 6S:9L bZ/ZZ WOad/O1 3WI1 31dQ Z i? Z 0 ' 3JCd 00 ~ LZ 00 ~ bl; rION d0 Sti ** 1a0d321 NO I 1CWa I dNOJ Xl ** NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho at the hour of 7:00 p.m. on November 14, 2000, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of G.L. Voigt Development for annexation and zoning of 70.72 acres from Ada County Zone RT to R-8 for proposed Sundance Subdivision generally located at the northeast corner of Ustick and Meridian Roads; Furthermore, the applicant requests Preliminary Plat approval of 214 single- family lots, 4 future office lots, 23 common lots, and 3.43 other lots on 69.79 acres also for proposed Sundance Subdivision in a proposed R-8 zone generally located at the northeast corner of Ustick and Meridian Roads. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 5th day of Oc~obe~~~~,~~O1jrr,,fy _ I o `{~; r(~ sir ~jl~L_ ~ V ~ ,~ '~ s ~' ~~~ P~+. WILLIAM G. tERG, JR., T CLERK s PUBLISH October 2~`" d N~~r 1 "', ~ ,~aTi~~ ~\``~ 'ter 9 ~~~ ~. .~ ,~~' ~, ~~ ~, i~ w /'~` ~w b (~ K m 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ' 1 2 3 4 ~ 5 I 6 8 9 10 B C 1 B OC S 7 W. HELENA STREET 12 11 < 1 2 3 4 LO 5 K 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 W W 8 1 30 11 29 28 12 10 23 22 21 20 19 1g 17 16 15 14 13 ~ 2 3 4 27 13 26 - - ° i z LC I I " - W. KALISPEL STREET J z~j -`Qj}~ O 7 g 5 4 3 2~ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ia g 24 48 ~ I ~ BL C{Q 1 ~ BLOGIK 2 , ~ 7~ 23 ° 1 47 l.tW 2 16 15 14 13 12 11 ~ 8 U 22 B K 6 W. GREAT FPLLS ST. Z 1 3 O 46 17 Z 9 m 21 45 9 g 7 2 18 3 2 1 10 20 44° OCK 7 4 3 / 5 11 19 43 ~ 42 i i~ ~ 11 i~ 16 ~, 5 V ~-' 6 I ~ 12 18 i m I i ~ ~ ! ~.~ 12 ~ ~~e`G e~^R ~aE ~ 4 I 7 13 17 41 i /~ ~ 10 11 12 ~ BLOC 9 II~q ,~' I 13 8 9 RT 8 14 15 16 f 0 14 7 OG $ 2 1 39 ~ ~ 3 W. SMOKEYHLL ORNE 18 5 4 30 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 36 37 38 16 m 7O Z BLOC 10 O 18 23 ~ 29 24 23 22 21 20 19 17 16 28 25 15 19 20 21 22 24 za W. WilO HORSE DRNE ~ g 14 25 26 27 3 4 5 6 7 ~ 2 B OC 11 g 13 ~1 49 12 11 37 36 35 34 33 < 15 14 13 10 12 i W, WOLF PONT OR. 11 BLOCK7 W. WOLF PONT CT. 4 5 6 7 8 50 45 38 39 41 42 43 3 9 10 BL C 10 J ROAD N S-~tp,SSER FARMS 300 0 BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. g~(LnEERAa BRIGGS n~ (208) 3449700 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD BOISE, IDAHO 83705 MERIDIAN CITY L[MI'~S 30$6E1"Pd'F~t~R~-~ t RT 1" = 300' VICINITY MAP w. KALISPEL STREET ACRES PP~C I O DNI ~ EDGAR ST. I, II old I ADDESON ST. 0 \\ SUNDANCE SUBDIVISION PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 31, T.4N., R.lE., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO DESIGN DRAFT SCALE GATE DWG. NO. BKB 1" = 300' 08/29/00 0205 REVISION sHEET of i \0205.APR 0 W m v v D -+ j ~ ~ 1 I ~ I p v I ~.. Ut I z I W N -- r m a y Z N ~°- CJl I .~ W I N 1 O ~ ~ a3 , a_ c' ~ ~ m a m m ~~ ~ ~ a v A ~ _ 3 ~ ~ c ~ ?, ~ ,~ 3~. , a N n `~° ~ m m e ~ ? n. ~ N ~ s v \ o p ae ~ P n A A N ~ 'i ~ o > n n ~ G ~. - <zZ 3 a ~ v Q = ~ L` ~ ,~ ~ a o O v 3 ~ ~ v a < r ~ 3 ~ r cn ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ y o N ~ a D a N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' 3 .~ N f ~ n o a '^ Q ~ ~ ~ lD ~ ~ W ~ C m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Of t C ~ ~ d ~ ~ m a ~ (D 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ J~ ~ ~ ~ 7~ ~ N ~ C vi ~ m W D c ' ~ ~ ` ~ ~ _ . 3 `~ ~ `D ~ ~ ^ 00 ^ Q ~ ~ 1 C ~ ~ O y ~ % i ~ ~ ~ ~ .. N 2 ~ (D C G (D y ~p C a 3 a N N W W W ~ W N ~ CW/1 N tWlt v Cf1 .P F+ ~ N ? W W T~ h+ ~ ~ c ,o~ m ~ ~ v r c ii ~ c ii t ii cn i n ° ! . ` " ^ ~ ^ ^ n ~ n ~ n ~ n ~ z . , u~,. ~ l c ~ ( ~ i ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ n j ~ ' ~ I K Q ~ I ~ ~ o ~ ~ i _ c cT_ (~ y +± C u ~' {1 ~ ~ ~ m I ~ ~p 3 d O I ~ ~ ~ i m y` N n ,~ m C ~~ O n m C n A ~ ` N ~m ~~ ~ "- d m m . ~ ~ m ~ m - g o c °-' a t d o. j a m O 7 ~ j ~ C o ~ A N A 7 C w o ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 m ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ cD n o ~ a o d ~ ~ ~ ? ~ y i° m ~ a a a a a a a a a a a~ ~- - e~3oo~ ~ > > > > > > > > > > > ~ 9 a 9 ~~ o N c 'v~' ` °0 ~ .-. ~ n `D c m = o N~ n 3 W a a a a a a a a a ~ mo ~ C n 3 m m 3 Q~ p~ p~ p1 ~ pp~~ ~ 9 a 3 ~ ~ ~ a n~ y ? ~ .A ~ ? ~ ? ~A m ~ _O N-'m y N m d ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ O 67 fA~ Ri ° N ' ~ m o g~ o ~ ` T O .n d N A ° ~d T~ ~ = C.1 , C 7~ 3 A c~ m ~~. ~ a o ~ `D c- ~c y m c ~ J ~i io j m ~ n ~ I ~ ~ cD ~= Q ~ c_ m ~ m y~ ? m T' C17 ~ ~ n ~ j . m V m n n n v N ~. H m ~°-'?mom G ~ ~ ~.~ Oc0 f C N _ ~ - 9 ry O -~ O ~' ^J n ry O~ 7 - e a ~ m o ~ W . = m ~ N % y N ~ ~ ~ m O in d ~ d m ~ '.J ~ -. ~ n O ~ m C 3 N J d X y tp U - ~ ~ N 1 , ~ 'QQ D ® m ] O `C m ~ y ~ a o ~ , ~ ~ C n , m m n ~_ (9 C K -i a m m 7 O m C .9 W 7 ~~ m 0 w w v D r ~~ I f '^ ~ ~ I ,~ W N 1 ~ O i y a m m a- ~ ~ m c m N O ,~ 3 ~ u i ~ Q m m Z o !~ c o ~ ~~ « N i c = o ~ i A N D ~ m O D a n ~ m °' N ~ ~ O ~ d 3 m d c `~ z ~ 0 0 ~ y 3 ~ o~ ~ < a ~ O!D c vo$ ~' m m ~ ~ ~ 7 41 Q `~ 7 ~ ~ '~ <, < °- d ~ m ~ v ¢o ¢o G7 Sp R° R° v lD ~ m ~ O d G ~ ~ n tD ~ 3 ~ - ~ N ~ ~ C m 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ^~~ ~ a ~ m O 7 ip tL (~ ~ ~ m i O y m x ~ C L'7 ~ y ~ m y ~. ~; c ~ c o ~ ~ m m m ^O~^ ~ m ~~ c,~ m ~ 11 _ d r ~ d ~ ,~ 8 ~ A C. d c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ m ,~ 3 ~_ o o n = NiO~z.o ~ a m ~_~ c ~ -~ d ~ ~ ~ ` o .... or m s - n m = a m = < ~ ~ ~ 'n ~o cime m m `m ~ c i iNmOC, 3=' e m c m g c° -' °myC moo y c ° ~ m 3 - N - m ~ ~ o -t «+ , - ~ `~ 3 g o~ 7 7 7 3 7 = O O ~~ S ' m m O - F ff O °~~ 0~ ~ ~ Z~ o m C' cc ao m-~~~ m ,a ,~ ~;ag3d a a a a a .. a a m ~ ~ O ~ c f ~ ~ W pppp ~~ a y ~ m m ~ d.n C N 7 ~/ m W .A p~ pp11 ~A Q~ .A ~ pp~~ A r m ~ O m p N -{ (D ~ N a m m ~O C~ mno°iwm o ,e~ m~ mn C. ~ ~ ~ ' 1D m Cn " y c y ~~ ~.~ m.7 ~ ~ Q p ~ O m ~ m n 0 m- ~ y ~ O G o a o ~ n~, `-'> ~3N m~ n p v ~ ~ > ~cy,~~`° ~ m O ~x ~•~? H n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: u,~ mm~ m ~ a O~ ao cN=. a m O , ~ K (~_m - J 0 0 o n 0 m ~0'0 '< 3 3 o m ~ m _ ~ to m ~ c a 3 G m y y O N~ m 7 W ~ 3 m G c? _N. 7 ~, N 3 m m C~ N? ~. u O~c N j n 7 ~ O D m ~ 7 r ~ m m H ~ C c ~ m o m n O 3 m A C x 0 O v N a D n~ O c a ~. m W V v cD N o ~ ~ ~ I j 1 ~ Q I ~ I G1 ~! I U, I CIt I a I W N -~ r m o a 3 ~ ~ - ~ ~ J. W ~ N ~ d ~ 7 a ? ~ d ~ N 7 C ~3 I a ' A `°~ ~ 7~~ ° a nc af° ~~ ~ ~ '~ N ° o O i a ~ L A /p N 1 ~ O ~ d n y m - < Z ~ c ; a3 I m c ~ - ~ ~ d ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ W ~ Ul ~ N fn ~ ~ 1 ~ ~, ~ 7 ~ ~ ? 'S /y~, rm N n- G < ~ ~ N ~ 30 7 ~ N ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G m ~ r p r+; N d fD C j ,~, m m p ~ ti m ~ R ~ C~ y~ I f (D C G ~ C ~O $ ~^ ~ ~ m m a o r ~ ~ ~ rn n~~i1 ~ m m m m ~' _ - i ~ - n „ ; _ _ _ ~ ~1 17 ~ ^ I = G ~ ¢ r = ~ .7 .nr I ~ c~ I ~ ~ 3 'o' i ~ ~ ~ ' N;O~~.o-~ ~ d o m 7 " - ~ ~ ... _ _ m ~ c m d `~ m e d ~~ ~ ~ H 7 H = n m~ ~ a - (D o N ~ y j ~. 69 ~ 4 d p ~ n m d~ 7 O 0 ~ ~' C a d D. 7 < d N m y' m ?. o~ 3 3 3 3 3 ~ N ° ~ a a a a oBx -~ a n a a - - - _ ~. ~ y C U d H n~ 3 0 0~ OI 7 ~ ~ ", 7 ~ _ ~ O ~^ ~ m m~~ ~ d ~ -m (~ (~ n x > > `° m n ~ ~ o N c d N a ~ 3~ o a a a a n n a a 1 ~, _~ ~_ '~ C m a o N ~ lA1 ap Cp WW11 pp~1 QQ~~ ~ pp~~ ~ `9 ~ 2 T m a d 7 ~ ~m 3 ~ ~i ~ ~ -A J~ .A .A H$ 3 d °1 y,' an O N -1 an d mp (9 TO N ~~ y (n ~ 7 yN m ma ~ ~ N O c7 n 7 y m m - , ~ o Q !' e a ~ U7 ~ C7 C~ C ~. „ A ~ d ~ -_ y J d N. C y 0 m Q Z' ~ (D G~ N 7~ C~ _ ~ 1 na ~~ ~ J y ? O ~D c_, x_ 7 3 N 7 -~ ~ tD N J 7 T ~ ~ 10 =~<? N d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G ~ ~ N ~ w Ca0 a ocn ~ ~;? ~ g u ~ o m . ~ n £ ~ h = p o ? ~ ~ ° •< ° 3 m~ oy.3 d °~x = V d ~~ N~c cm°' ~~? m _d s ~ m ~ ~ C m ]- p m ~yc3«.3 d N m od1DO~ „( ~ ~ W m ~ $ a ~ C , m o + m ~O y n~, D N d CJ CJ N G T1 D CJ V O1 I I 1 0 ~ I p I J I ~ ~ I ~ I W N 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ "~ fV ~ O. ~ m m a a m Z I y N 7 ,Q c ~~ ~ a `°Q o z > 3 '° ~ ~ mm ~ o.~ 3 v z « g o O c °D r ,, ~ P A f0 N ~ ~ ~ c D a G ,~ (9 ~ G Z O C m d 3 d c ~ m ~ z ~ c c 3 ~ ~ o ~ ~ °~ ~B ~. ~ m ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ j a ~ ¢° ¢° v ~ b U _ D O o _ m N _ ~ N ~ v (~ t6 q n n ~ ` W ~ 3 m ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ Z ~ y ^^^ ^ ~ ~ ~ O cD ~n ~ x C C'] ~ `G C ~ y O 2 G C 5 m ~ ~' a'AO ~ - a g m m m ^^^^ m ~ i ~ ( ~~ ~~ ~ j ='?_ 1 I y' dl d _ C'~y O ~ ~~ w c c G m < ~ ~ .^ m~ ` J O 3 ~ m _ ~ ~, _ - v c' ~ _~ ~ N~O~'~.o 7 m j ~ '~' n m +~; C; o ` ~ m m c d ~ u ~ phi ` ~ _ ~Sn t°o cn m ~° ~-' y y i 6~ i d - 9 ~ J d j ~. M N . ~ U • ~ ~ G m°'mgd^~ vo"~ _ ~N .c m m ~ [D lD m - w - - ~n ogx.°o~ - - `m 3'^~ ~; ~ ~ ~ wwJ~' m~ ~ n(n x j~ m G . G ~ v ~ j ~ O. p J '" C (D m fn ~' ~ O 7 N ~ 7 ;~ O< C ~ n j d ~ ~ < O O yc. j O d j^ m 7 N N ~ JJ ry 7J 6 3 _. A C H ~~ 0' N ~ ~ d N~ J (D ~ c ~ O V1 N J v y o m m G ~ O (7 ~°_o3°j y' n o d m~ ~~ m n -_ o C= : o . m 3 3 d m a ~ J d ~. C ?~ O I I T Q~ O. O e o m a o~ I I ° T ~~ C O ? n o f c ~D c e, 7 T ~ O 0 ~ C 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_..~ ,~ a O n m u+ , N y m u m q T D cD. Q p cn d ?" o =, Q a m m ~ b -- y - ~ F •cn m ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ' ~ J !. , ~ o O3 o u d a V ~ o . ~ N. 3, N ~v H c N ~ ~ G~ N J N a ~ m ~ ~ a ~ G m 7_ N W d y d C~ N~ . O ?' O O~ ~ n ~ o v N - ~ m ~ o~ ~ i N Gv m y !1l D x m m C a