Loading...
Resolution Business Park PP 00-006CITY CLERK FILE CHECKLIST Project Name:I r� �, �U�• % Gf: 1.k, File No. �j.� � � - (1 0 �>7 Contact Name: ti �� Oi� , 7� y f f Phone: 4- i - Date Received from Planning and Zoning Department: Planning and Zoning Level: ❑ Transmittals to agencies and others: ❑ Notice to newspaper with publish dates: Hearing Date: ❑ Certifieds to property owners: _ ❑ Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: Notes: City Council Level: Transmittals to agencies and others: ❑J Notice to newspaper with publish dates Certifieds to property owners: City Council Action: and 0 Approve 0 Deny Hearing Date:% � nom_ 9 _ and 2. EJ- Approve ❑ Deny LLFindings / Conclusions / Order received from attorney on: Findings / Conclusions / Order: 2- Approved by Council: _ Q Copies Disbursed: ❑ Findings Recorded Development Agreement: ❑ Sent for signatures: ❑ Signed by all parties: ❑ Approved by Council: ❑ Recorded: ❑ Copies Disbursed: Ordinance No. ❑ Approved by Council: ❑ Recorded 2'2-0 —0c) —2Z --b Resolution No. Deadline: 10 days ❑ Published in newspaper: ❑ Copies Disbursed: Notes: (/�- /10 —D D Resolutions: Original Res / Copy Cert: Minutebook Copy Res / Copy Cert: City Clerk City Engineer City Planner City Attorney Sterling Codifiers Project File Copy Res / Original Cert: Ada County (CPAs) Applicant (non -CPAs) Recorded Ordinances: Original: Minutebook Copies to: City Clerk State Tax Comm. Sterling Codifiers City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Project file Applicant (if appl.) Findings / Orders: Original: Minutebook Copies to: Applicant Project file City Engineer City Planner City Attorney *' Record Vacation Findings ** Recorded Development Agreements: Original: Fireproof File Copies to:Applicant Project file City Engineer City Planner City Attorney NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho at the hour of 6:30 p.m. on March 22, 2000 for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of G.L. Voigt Development/Overland, LLC for preliminary plat of 107.06 acres, LO and CG zoning for proposed Resolution Business Park which is generally located south of Overland and east of Locust Grove. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 1St day of March 2000. WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., 6YITYCLERK PUBLISH March 10 and 17, 2000. V- ,� U 112A - 7 1SC g88 -4q-33 4�7 ** TX CONFIR-ION REPORT ** DATE TIME TO/FROM 05 03/02 09:57 208 377 E309 C% "7* G 3D 9 AS OF MAR 02 --- '3 09: 58 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD# STATUS EC --S 01'12" 005 019 OK l amu-- "-7 .a,t��-�v�t yr t-wa 8BB- �cF33 MAYOR HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY Robert D. Corrie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 Ron Anderson Keith Bird EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 PUBL33 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 •Fax 887-1297 Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22 2000 FILE NUMBER: — PP -00-006 REQUEST: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF 107.06 PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY: G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: – LO AND CG ZONING 10 LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED) SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR _RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C _TAMMY de WEERD, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE _BUILDING DEPARTMENT _FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER _CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO -(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM & FINAL) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: a PARCEL OWNER OWNADDI OWNADD3 OWNLAST 51117438620 VAN AUKER RONALD W 3084 E LANARK MERIDIAN ID 83642 2 51117346610 PECK CURTIS D & KIM L 6149 N MEEKER PL STE 250 BOISE ID 83713-1568 3 S1117346600 HOWELL WILLARD & ANGELA PO BOX 848 EAGLE ID 83616 y R7100270100 CONTRACTORS EQUIP SUPLY CO INC 2000 E OVERLAND MERIDIAN ID 83642 6 R7100270300 PLAYGROUND INC 4098 N JULLION WAY BOISE ID 63704-2763 b R7100270200 JE DOUBLE D LLC 4601 N FIVE MILE BOISE ID 83713 7 51117346660 HOWELL WILLARD & ANGELA PO BOX 848 EAGLE ID 83616 51118449300 LOCUST GROVE PROPERTIES LLC 1109 MAIN ST SUITE #500 BOISE ID 83702 ') S1119110025 FARRELL ART V PATRICIA PARKS 32 W PROSPECTORS DR CASCADE ID 83611 �p R8076810230 CAMERON MICHAEL J & CAMERON TEENA L 1632 S LABRADOR PL MERIDIAN ID 83642 11 R8075810240 REDENBO NEWTON C & REDENBO CHRISTI L 1654 S LABRADOR PL MERIDIAN ID 83642 Nl R8075810250 DROLLINGER KELLI A & DROLLINGER SCOTT 1670 S LABRADOR PL MERIDIAN ID 83642 1 R8075810260 REMKES KARL B & BREEZI 1700 S LABRADOR PL MERIDIAN ID 83642 ' R8075810270 VIERTEL EUGENE K & VIERTEL JEANNETTE L 1728 S LABRADOR PL MERIDIAN ID 83642 R8075810280 GEHRING JEFF D & LAURIE H 1550 E PEACOCK ST MERIDIAN ID 83642 (p R8075810290 JOHNSON GREG B PO BOX 344 MERIDIAN ID 83680-0344 R8075810300 CONRAD GERALD L & CONRAD JOANNE C 2181 RIBIER DR MERIDIAN ID 83642 ( R8075810310 SPORTSMAN POINTE OWNERS ASSOCIATION 6223 N DISCOVERY WAY SUITE #100 BOISE ID 83713 R8075810410 MACKENZIE DON 1551 E PEACOCK ST MERIDIAN ID 83680 2p R8075810420 BURKETT BOB F & BURKETT KATHERINE A 1573 E PEACOCK ST MERIDIAN ID 83642 2( R8075810430 NELSON STEVEN J & NELSON JANET L 1595 E PEACOCK ST MERIDIAN ID 83642 ZL R8076810320 SPORTSMAN POINTE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION 6223 N DISCOVERY WAY SUITE #100 BOISE ID 83713 23 R8075810400 AUSTIN ROBERT D & TERESA A TRS AUSTIN R D & T A TRUSTEES 1834 S LABRADOR PL MERIDIAN ID 83642 yJR8075810390 ROBINSON JUSTIN & AMY B 1564 E PUFFIN CT MERIDIAN ID 83642 xj R8075810380 HINCKLEY N E & BUCHAK SUSAN C 1582 E PUFFIN CT MERIDIAN ID 83642 26 R8075810370 CARICO SCOTT & MELISSA L 1581 E PUFFIN CRT MERIDIAN ID 83642 2,1 R8075810350 PERRY RONALD R & DEANNA L 1886 S LABRADOR PL MERIDIAN ID 83642 7,Q'R8075810360 PAFFUMI ROBERT D & PAFFUMI ANGELA R 1563 E PUFFIN CRT MERIDIAN ID 83642 SIT R8075810340 COMPTON T NEAL & COMPTON SUSAN E 1574 E MASTIFF ST MERIDIAN ID 83642 70 R8075810330 JACKSON LARRY E & NASH- TONI L 1598 E MASTIFF ST MERIDIAN ID 83642 -41 R8075810030 MOONEY CRAIG J & BAIRD LISA ANN 1575 E MASTIFF ST MERIDIAN ID 83642 3 L R8075810020 KNOWLES TODD A & LISA O 1597 E MASTIFF ST MERIDIAN ID 83642 3 3 R8075810010 SPORTSMAN POINTE OWNERS ASSOCIATION 6223 N DISCOVERY WAY SUITE #100 BOISE ID 83713 3 51120121000 KENAI PARTNERS LLC 6223 N DISCOVERY WAY BOISE ID 83713 ,56S1120223301 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LDS 6223 N DISCOVERY WAY BOISE ID 83713 34 51120131315 COULTER KENNETH D & COULTER CONNIE 3889 BOWMAN RD EMMETT ID 83617-9713 97 R7463830020 SCHMIDT RICHARD A & SCHMIDT KAREN 1770 CHAROLAIS DR MERIDIAN ID 83642-4324 34 R7463830030 WELSH STANLEY W & WELSH REGINA L 1866 CHAROLAIS DR MERIDIAN ID 83642-6624 3,1 S1120131400 KENAI PARTNERS LLC 6223 DISCOVERY WAY BOISE ID 83713 gVR7463830100 WELCH PATRICIA ANN 1931 CHAROLAIS DR MERIDIAN ID 83642-6625 1 R7463830090 BLACK MICHAEL L & BLACK LISA L 1867 CHAROLAIS DR MERIDIAN ID 83642-6625 287463830080 STEINBRONER F & M TRUSTEES 1835 CHAROLAIS DR MERIDIAN ID 83642-6625 R7349250240:ENCE MARIANNE AND SNODGRASS DONNA JEAN 2036 E BLUE TICK ST MERIDIAN ID 83642 R7349250230 STROLBERG ERIC KENT & 715.-R7349260220 STROLBERG TARA LYNN 9423 CALICO BOISE ID 83709 HOWARD KLETE A & R7349250210 GREENER LAURA HOWARD SHAUNA J 1974 E BLUE TICK ST MERIDIAN ID 83634 L & GREENER ROBERT 1950 E BLUE TICK ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-5910 R734:250200 TRASKA JOHN P & TRASKA JUELIE A 1928 E BLUE TICK ST MERIDIAN ID 83642 87349250190 CARPENTER GAIL P & VICKI L 1900 E BLUE TICK ST MERIDIAN ID 83642 87349250320 ROGERS JOHN M & ROGERS DIXIE L 1985 E BLUE TICK MERIDIAN ID 83642 R7349260330 HOLTON HOMES INC 16299 FRANKLIN NAMPA ID 83687 R7349250660 BURNHAM JACK LEE & BURNHAM CAROL ANN 2236 S TAGISH WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642 5'-,Z,R7349250310 HOLTON HOMES INC _ 16299 FRANKLIN NAMPA ID 83687 S R7349250300 NOBLE ROGER J JR & NOBLE MARY ANN 1964 E GRIFFON ST MERIDIAN ID 83642 R7349250650 MONTROSE TODD L & MONTROSE NAOMI K 2268 S TAGISH WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642 5 R7349250640 FOGG STACEY �R7349250460 2290 S TAGISH WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642 SMITH JODY G & SMITH MISTY M 1997 E GRIFFON ST MERIDIAN ID 83642 DECKER STANLEY R & DECKER TAMMY L 1973 E GRIFFON ST MERIDIAN ID 83642 s�R7349250470 R7349260630 RENNA EDWARD A & RENNA TARI M 2312 S TAGISH WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642 51120244600 MERIDIAN CITY 33 E IDAHO AVE MERIDIAN ID 83642-2631 R7349250620 MICONE PHILIP V & MICONE PATRICIA A 2330 S TAGISH WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642 ( R7349260450 MAUS DOUGLAS G 2315 S TAGISH WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642 (PL R7349260440 DEVELLE ROBYN R 1978 E DOBERMAN MERIDIAN ID 83642 61 R7349250610 VANCE ROBERT D & SKINNER-VANCE MARY T 2354 S TAGISH WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642 101 R7349250600 GLENN ROBERT R 2604 N COLE RD BOISE ID 83704-5910 65 R7349250590 DELK ANNA L 2011 E DOBERMAN DR MERIDIAN ID 83642 41,R7349250680 CUSHING TERRY A & CUSHING ALVETA L 1989 E DOBERMAN DR MERIDIAN ID 83642 bl R5330160640 FARWEST LLC 4550 W STATE ST BOISE ID 83703-4467 69115330160130 LOS ALAMITOS PARK SUB HOA INC 95510 BETHEL CRT BOISE ID 83709 61 R5330160120 CHRISTENSON JAMES A & CHRISTENSON KAREN S 2401 S BRANDYS JEWEL AVE MERIDIAN ID 83642 70 R5330160070 LOS ALAMITOS PARK SUB HOA INC COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT 9550 BETHEL CRT BOISE ID 83709 -jf R5330160010 AGENBROAD RONALD C & AGENBROAD CAROLYN L 2410 S TAGISH WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642 -'2 R6330150200 HUMPHRY KELLY J & HUMPHRY WENDY K 2028 E PARTY JET ST MERIDIAN ID 63642 73 R5330150210 JACKSON MICHAEL L 2050 E PARTY JET MERIDIAN ID 83642 �¢ R5330150190 CARSON BRYAN C 2002 E PARTY JET ST MERIDIAN ID 83642 T R5330160550 KUBENA TED M & LOIS I TRUST KUBENA TED M & LOIS I TRUSTEES 2454 E RED CLOUD AVE MERIDIAN ID 83642 11,R5330160020 HERNDON DOUGLAS L & HERNDON LAUREL 2428 S TAGISH WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642 rR6330160110 GUTH KEVIN R & GUTH KAREN 2427 S BRANDYS JEWEL AVE MERIDIAN ID 83642 -7f'R5330160100 WOODWARD JIM R & WOODWARD LOUINDA L 2453 S BRANDYS JEWEL AVE MERIDIAN ID 83642 COMPTON RICHARD W & LAW-COMPTON SUSAN 2472 S BRANDYS JEWEL AVE MERIDIAN ID 83642 ;R5330160560 R5330160030 HOWARD LEROY V & IR5330160040 DUNCAN TERRI HOWARD MARLENE 2452 S TAGISH WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642 4240 FORTUNA WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 83719-0974 . cvz�o \a� A. XIATED EARTH SCIENCES INS BIOLOGY • GEOLOGY • ENGINEERING • SOIL SURVEYS • SOIL AND WATER QUALITY • RESOURCE PLANNING AND SITE INVESTIGATIONS 4696 Overland Rd., Suite 516 Boise, Idaho 83705 208 336-8661 December 17, 1999 Attn: Vern Wartman G. L. Voigt Development Co. 1900 E. Jennie Lee Idaho Falls, ID 83403 Dear Vern: A soil investigation was made on the Millennium Subdivision located in the NW -NW of Section 29, T.3N., R.1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. The purpose of the investigation was to determine soil physical properties and soil internal drainage conditions in areas where storm drainage facilities may be installed. Three backhoe test pits were excavated and described in the areas of potential storm drains. Soil texture, soil colors (as indicators of internal soil drainage), permeability of identified layers, restrictive soil layers (cemented hardpan, clay content, compacted layers), plant rooting depth, and presence or absence of free water (water table) were all considered in this study. Detailed field notes and a map showing approximate location of test holes are attached. Monitoring wells (perforated 4" PVC pipes) were installed in each test hole to monitor the seasonal groundwater depths during the 2000 irrigation season. The groundwater depths, if any occurs, should be measured and recorded every 10 days from about April 1, 2000 — August 31, 2000. If no ground water appears in the wells by July 1, 2000, monitoring could be discontinued. All three test holes were dry at the time of excavation and there were no mottles or gleyed colors (oxidation and/or reduction colors caused by fluctuating groundwater). I don't anticipate high groundwater in the test hole areas, but monitoring the wells will confirm it. See the attached field notes for detail on soil physical properties. If you have any questions about this report, please call me at (208) 672-9213. Sincerely, WS�— -Oo�oz� Glen H. Logan Certified Professional Soil Scientist cc: Attn: Becky Bowcutt cc: Vern Wartman Briggs Engineering, Inc. 2450 S. Five Mile 1800 W. Overland Road Boise, ID 83709 Boise, ID 83705 , ^ AES Soil Evaluation Evaluation Date 12/16/99 Requested By Briggs Engineering for G. L. Voigt Development Co Address City Idaho Falls State Idaho Zip Code 83403 Phone (208)890-8818 Lot Size — Bedrooms — Parcel — Legal Description Part of NWNW of Section 29, T.3N., R.1E., B.M. Ada County, Idaho �l rung ()-1 °< Ftral tiat'ar1 Rtr ('-1 cn W T.nr^r=n ('DCC Additional Info: TH 1 - No free water (water table) to 144" depth. No gleyed or mottled colors indicating high water table. TH2 - No free water (water table) to 165" depth. No gleyed or mottled colors. TH3 - No free water (water table) to 165" depth. No gleyed or mottled colors. Pit TH 1 Pit TH2 Pit TH3 0-8" Silt loam (20-25% 0-9" Silt loam (20% 0-8" Silt loam (25+% clay), IOYR 3/4, many clay), 10YR 3/4, clay), 1OYR 3/4, fine roots, estimated many fine roots, many fine roots, permeability 2"/hr. estimated estimated permeability 2"/hr. permeability 1-2"/hr. 8-21" Loamy fine sand (5% clay), weakly cemented 9-21" Silt loam (25% 8-30" Silt loam (25% clay), and very compact, clay), 10YR 3/6, 10YR 4/4, common 10YR 4/6, common common fine roots, fine roots, estimated fine roots, estimated estimated permeability 2"/hr. permeability .5"/hr. permeability 1-2"/hr. 30-65" Indurated hardpan, 21-65" Indurated hardpan, fractured, few fine fractured, few fine 21-32" Silt loam (20% roots in upper 3", roots in upper 6", clay), l OYR 5/4, estimated estimated permeability few fine roots, permeability <.2"/hr. estimated permeability 2"/hr. 65-110" Loamy medium sand 65-82" Fine sandy loam (10- (<5% clay), compact, 15`0 clay), lOYR 3/4, 32-69" Indurated hardpan, no roots, estimated no roots, estimated fractured, few fine permeability .5"/hr. permeability 5"/hr. roots in upper 4", estimated 110-122" Gravelly loamy 82-118" Very gravelly coarse permeability medium sand (5% sand (<5% clay), <.2"/hr. clay), very compact, variegated color, no variegated color, no roots, estimated 69-108" Very fine sandy roots, estimated permeability 15+"/hr. loam (10-15% permeability .5 "/hr. clay), l OYR 5/6, no 118-144" Fine sandy loam roots, estimated 122-165" Extremely gravelly (15-20% clay), very permeability 4"/hr. fine sand, variegated compact, IOYR 5/4, no color, no roots, roots, estimated 108-128" Loamy fine sand estimated permeability <.2"/hr. (5-10% clay), very permeability 20+"/hr. compact and weakly cemented, 10YR 5/4, no roots, estimated permeability <.2 "/hr. 128-165" Extremely gravelly fine sand (<5% clay), variegated color, no roots, estimated permeability 20+"/hr. Additional Info: TH 1 - No free water (water table) to 144" depth. No gleyed or mottled colors indicating high water table. TH2 - No free water (water table) to 165" depth. No gleyed or mottled colors. TH3 - No free water (water table) to 165" depth. No gleyed or mottled colors. 12. What school(s) set a the area? Mary McPherson do you propose any agreements for future school sites? No Explain 54.99 Acres is proposed as a Meridian High School Site (Lot 1, Block 1) (owned by Joint School District No 2) 13. Are there any other proposed amenities to the City? No , Explain 14. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial or combination): Commercial/ Office/Multi Family (Lot 9, Block 1) 15. Type of Dwelling(s) (Single Family, Duplexes, Multiplexes, other): Apartments/200 Units 16. Proposed Development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot(s): 38,879 b. Minimum square footage of structure(s): Varies for multi -family, office & retail C. Are garages provided for? Yes Square footage: 200 — 400 f SF d. Has landscaping been provided for: Yes , Describe (30') Landscaping_ adjoining, Overland Road and (20') adjoining, Locust Grove e. Will trees be provided for? Yes Will trees be maintained ? Yes f. Are sprinkler systems provided for? Yes g. Are there multiple units ? Yes Type: Apartments (10 units/building,) Remarks: (1) Lot will accommodate the multi -family h. Are there special set back requirements ? No Explain: i. Has off street parking been provided for ? Yes Explain: Parking lots and g,arag,es within the apartment complex j. Value range of property: N/A k. Type of financing for development: Conventional 1. Were protective covenants submitted? No , Date: Will submit with final plat 17. Does the proposal land lock other property? No Does it create Enclaves? No STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be constructed to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. 2. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 3. Development will connect to City services. 4. Development will comply with City Ordinances. 5. Preliminary Plat will include all appropriate easements. 6. Street names must not conflict with City grid system. 9-604 B PRE -APPLICATION MEETING The developer shall meet with the Administrator prior to the submission of the Preliminary Development Plan. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss early and informally the purpose and effects of this Ordinance and the criteria and standards contained herein, and to familiarize the developer with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and such other plans and ordinances as deemed appropriate. The developer may also meet with the Commission or Council prior to submitting an application. 0 l 01 \SU BA PPL -MER -pp (2) STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK 1. The proposed internal transportation facility will be a mixture of public streets and private drives. The construction of the private drives will be consistent with commercial developments where internal access is provided to parking facilities adjoining the businesses. Pedestrian facilities will be provided with 5' sidewalks. The internal public streets will be constructed with a 41 foot (back of curb to back of curb) street section which compiles with ACHD Standards. Ada County Highway District will require 5 -foot sidewalks along Overland and Locust Grove Roads. 2. The two parcels (Voigt and Overland LLC) are designated mixed planned use development. The Meridian School District parcel is designated single-family residential. A request for annexation and rezone was submitted on the Voigt and Overland LLC. The subdivision application is part of a planned development and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The property will be served by the Five -Mile Creek sewer trunk line which is under construction. Therefore, sewer service will be available to the property. A 12 -inch water main is currently located in Overland Road and will require an extension of a 10 -inch water line to the Meridian School District Lot 10. 4. The proposed development will comply with all standards set forth in the Meridian Zoning Ordinance. 5. All existing easements are shown on the preliminary plat. 6. Received street name approval from Street Name Committee January 13,2000. 7. The subdivision will be mixed use with offices, retail uses, LDS Seminary, ice rink facility, multi -family development and high school. 8. The applicant prefers to fence off the Hunter Lateral. Staff may need to determine if a variance application is required. 0101\statmnt of comp] 5Z i 950011 `'4S • 41..1, �,�',• _ r.r. (J:1Or.R BOiSE 10 WARRANTY DEED FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO. '95 Al 6 FIN ti 58 For Value Received 4a i`r�E FEE.__.._ RECORDED ;.i i:_ OF N.L. Patel M.D., Inc., Profit Sharing and Pension Plan,as to a 50% interest; Sanjay Ray M.D., Inc., Money Purchase Plan Trust, as to a 30% interest and Ravinder N. Gupta, M.D., Inc., Profit Sharing Plan and Trust, as to a 20% interest hereinafter referred to as Grantor, does hereby grant, bargain, sell, and convey unt.� i r �b< 0 a 0 Gary L. Voigt, a single person, and R. Craig Groves, a married man as his sole and separate property hereinafter referred to as Grantee, whose current address is 1965 E. Overland Road, Boise, ID the following described premises, to -wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. To HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, with their appurtenances unto the said Grantee, his heirs and assigns forever. And the said Grantor does hereby covenant to and with the said Grantee, that Grantor is the owner in fee simple of said premises; that said premises are free from all encumbrances except current years taxes, levies, and assessments, and except U.S. Patent reservations, restrictions, easements of record, and casements visible upon the premises, and that Grantor will rrant and defend the same from all claims whatsoever. Dated: December 30,1994. N.L. Patel M.D., Inc., Profit Sharing and Pension Plan N. L. Patel, Trustee Sanjay Ray M.D., Inc., Money Purchase Plan Trust Sanjay Ray, Trustee by Naran Bhai L. Patel, his attorney in fact Ravinder N. Cupca, M.D., Inc., Profit Sharing Plan and Trust BY: Auvifr�6)t or 6, Y�.,�.,1 / r L(�� ! 6 '� c-1'1�frl71 Ravinder. N. Cupta, Trust:ee by Naran Bhni Patel, his attorney in fact First .American Title Company of Idaho i ). 00 p Iii 0 a d X � Q 0 ai o 1— o C w O a � N IY MJ CQu M o 11;rn p a > 0 d 72 'o i a> 07 nl (J Q CD O I� UEST FOR SUBDIVISION APPR(�%L PRELIMINARY PLAT AND/OR FINAL PLAT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION "IL P- oo- TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSION: A request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerks possession no later than three days following the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month that the request was made. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:00 P.M., Thursday following the Planning and Zoning Commission action. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Annexation and Subdivision: Resolution Business Park 2. General Location:' NW '/, Section 20 T. 3N., R. 1 E 3. Owners of record: G L Voigt Overland LLC & Joint School District No. 2 Address: P. O. Box 2044, Idaho Falls, Idaho , Zip 83403 Telephone (208)524-6000 4. Applicant: G L Voigt Address: P O Box 2044 Idaho Falls, Idaho , Zip 83403 Telephone (208)524-6000 5. Engineer, Stan McHutchison Firm Briggs Engineering, Inc. Address, 1800 W Overland Road Boise, ID Zip 83705 Telephone 344-9700 6. Name and address to receive City billings - Name: G L. Voigt Address P O Box 2044 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83403 Telephone (208)524-6000 PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres: 107.06 2. Number of building lots: 17 3. Number of other lots: 2 4. Gross density per acre: .16 5. Net density per acre: .18 6. Zoning Classification(s): Proposed L -O & C -G 7. If the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridian City Limits but within the jurisdictional mile, what is the existing zoning classification? Lot 10- 16 Block 1 (Zoned RT) 8. Does the plat border a potential green belt? No 9. Have recreational easements been provided for? No 10. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City? No Explain 11. Are there proposed dedications of common areas? No Explain 4.2 Acres in southeast corner of original property was deeded to City for a future lark For future parks? N/A Explain 0101 \SUBAPPL-MER-pp (1) DEC-lb-lyyy 13.;4 BRIGGS IGGS ENGINEERING, INC. i 12083452950 P.02 n LLL TL 1 �- , -3 -• `..1� L l -I LTF d7 ,r• 1-4\ THIS DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS & RESTRICTIONS AND GRATIN OF EASEMENTS FOR . ("Declaration") is made this an Idaho corporation ("Declarant"). ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS In addition to definitions contained elsewhere in this Declaration, the following terms shall have the following definitions when used herein. 1.1 Building shall mean the main portion of a roofed and walled structure built for permanent use and all projections or extension thereof, including, but not limited to, attached garages, platforms, docks and similar facilities. 1.2 Building Site shall mean a tract of real property in the Center as determined by the legal description in a conveyance or lease from the Declarant. If a fee simple title to two (2) or more adjacent Building Sites is acquired by the same Owner, such commonly -owned Building Sites may, at the option of said Owner, be combined and treated as a single Building Site for the purpose of this Declaration. 1.3 Center shall mean the real property known as , located in the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described in Exhibit "A "attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof. 1.4 Committee shall mean and refer to the Development Control Committee established pursuant to Article 5 hereof, its successors and assigns. 1.5 Declaration shall mean and refer to this Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions and Grant of Easements, including any amendments hereto in accordance with Article 15. 1.6 Improvements shall mean all Buildings, driveways, exterior lighting, fences, Landscaping, Lawns, loading areas, parking areas, railroad trackage, retaining walls, roadways, drainage channels, screening walls, Signs, utilities, walkways and other structures of any kind whatsoever. 1.7 Landscaping shall mean all Lawns, vegetative ground cover, shrubbery, trees, flowers, vines, earth forms, exterior irrigation systems, earth berms, terraces, retaining walls, fences, decoration rock and similar materials. 1.8 Lawns is a space of ground covered with turf grass, kept mowed, irrigated and otherwise neatly maintained. 4 G= 1.9 Occupant shall mean an individual, group of individuals or legal entity, other than an Owner, which has purchased, leased, rented or has otherwise legally acquired the right to occupy and use any Building Site, any Improvement thereon or any portion thereof, whether or not such right is exercised. 1.10 Open Space shall mean the gross land area on a Building Site exclusive of all Improvements other than fences, Landscaping, Lawns, retaining walls, drainage channels and underground utilities. 1.11 Owner shall mean an individual, group of individuals or legal entity which is record owner of a fee simple estate, or which has an equity of redemption, in a Building Site. 1.12 Sign shall mean any structure, device or contrivance and all parts thereof which are erected or used for advertising, directional or identificational purposes or any poster, bill, bulletin, printing, lettering, painting, device or other advertising of any kind whatsoever, which is placed, posted, or otherwise fastened or affixed to the ground or to structures within the boundaries of the Center. 1.13 Street shall mean any public right-of-way whether or not presently improved. ARTICLE 2 RECITALS 2.1 Owner. Declarant is the current owner of the fee simple estate in the real property constituting the Center. 2.2 Benefit. Declarant is desirous of subjecting the Center and all future Owners and Occupants to the provisions of this Declaration for the term set forth herein. ARTICLE 3 DECLARATIONS Declarant hereby declares that all Building Sites in the Center shall be held, transferred, sold, conveyed, leased, subleased and occupied subject to the provisions of this Declaration. ARTICLE 4 PURPOSE This Declaration is made to require development, improvement and use of property in the Center so as to: 4.1 Protection. Protect the Owners and Occupants of Building Sites against such use of neighboring Building Sites as might depreciate the value of their property. 4.2 Improvements. Encourage the erection of attractive, permanent Improvements appropriately located to ensure harmonious appearance and functions. 4.3 Parking. Assure adequate off-street parking spaces and off-street truck loading and maneuvering facilities. 4.4 Aesthetics. Encourage the development of aesthetic architectural and engineering design, including compatible Landscaping, and, in general, provide a harmonious development that will promote the general welfare of the Owners and Occupants. ARTICLE 5 CONTROL COMNUTTEE 5.1 Establishment and Appointment of Members. There is hereby established a Development Control Committee which shall consist of three (3) regular members, appointed initially by the Declarant; ______ ,. So long as the Declarant owns a minimum of five (5) acres in the Center, the Declarant shall be the appointing authority and shall appoint all members of the Committee and shall have the right to remove any and all members from the Committee at any time for any reason, with or without cause. Declarant at any time may assign in writing, for a definite or indefinite period of time, this right of appointment and removal, of one or more of said members. When the Declarant no longer owns five (5) or more acres in the Center, a majority of the Owners shall be the appointing authority. 5.2 Term. The regular term of office of each member of the Committee shall be one (1) year, ending December 31, or until such member's successor has been duly appointed. 5.3 Chairman. The appointing authority shall designate one (1) of the appointed members of the Committee to be Chairman. The Chairman shall take charge of and conduct all meetings and shall provide for reasonable notice to each member of the Committee prior to any meeting setting forth the place and time of said meeting, which notice may be waived. 5.4 Voting. The affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the Committee present at any meeting at which a quorum is present shall constitute the action of the Committee on any matter before it, e At least two (2) members must be present in person to constitute a quorum. The Committee may also take action without a meeting by unanimous written consent of its members. 0 5.5 Control. Except for Improvements which may be installed by the Declarant for the benefit of one or more of the Building Sites in the Center, no Improvement shall be made or altered on any Building Site nor any such work commenced until full and complete plans and specifications for such Improvements have been approved by the Committee, provided that alterations or remodeling which are completely within a Building and which do not change the exterior appearance and are not visible from the outside, may be undertaken without such approval. All construction shall be in accordance with approval. 5.6 Limitations and Effect of Actions. The approval or consent of the Committee on matters properly coming before it shall not be unreasonably withheld and actions taken shall not be arbitrary, capricious or discriminatory. Within such limits, however, decisions of the Committee shall be conclusive and binding on all interested parties. 5.7 Certificate of Compliance. Upon payment of a reasonable fee, set from time to time by the Committee, and upon the written request by any Owner, the Committee shall mail or deliver within thirty (30) days from receipt of the request, a certificate in recordable form stating whether or not the Building Site of such Owner is in violation of any provision of this Declaration. Said written statement shall be conclusive evidence of the facts stated therein in favor of the persons who rely thereon in good faith. If the Committee fails to mail or deliver such statement within said thirty (30) day period, the Building Site shall be conclusively presumed to be in conformance with this Declaration as of the date of receipt of such request. All references to days in this Section shall mean business days. 5.8 Liability of Committee. Neither the Declarant, the members of the Committee, or their officers, directors, agents, representatives, successors or assigns of the Declarant or such members shall be liable in damages to any person or entity submitting plans and specifications for approval, or to any Owner or Occupant of any Building Site or any other person by reason of mistake in judgment, negligence or nonfeasance arising out of or in connection with the approval process or the actions of members of the Committee when acting in that capacity. Every person or entity agrees, by submission of such plans and specifications, and every Owner and Occupant of any Building Site within the Center agrees, by acquiring title thereto or an interest therein, or by taking possession thereof, that such person, entity, Owner or Occupant will not bring any action or suit against the Declarant, the members of the Committee, or their officers, directors, agents or representatives, to recover any such damage. ARTICLE 6 LAND USE / EASEMENTS 6.1 Building Site. Building Sites within the Center shall be used for high quality officer purposes and similar uses which do not constitute noxious uses as described in Section 7.7 and which otherwise contribute to the implementation of and are consistent with the statement of purpose set forth in Article 4 of this Declaration. The term "similar uses" shall 7 include facilities for the assembly of light technical equipment and research and development laboratories which are architecturally compatible with high quality office uses. 6.2 Land Division. Except for land owned by the Declarant, no Building Site may be divided or subdivided without the prior written consent of the Committee. In connection with the consideration of a request by an Owner for consent to one of the above, the Committee may request such reasonable information as it deems necessary or desirable. After receipt of such information, the provisions for response and for challenge contained in Section 8.1 shall be applicable. 6.3 Easements. 6.3.1 Utility Easements. Each Owner and the Declarant, as grantors, hereby grant to the Declarant and their Owners, as grantees, for the benefit of all property in the Center owned by the Declarant and each Building Site in the Center owned by the other Owners, a non- exclusive easement under, through and across the ten feet (10') of any lot shown on any official plat of any portion of the Center adjacent to any Street and the five feet (5') adjacent to all lot lines not adjacent to a Street for the installation, repair, replacement, maintenance and operation of public utilities (including, without limitation, water mains, sewers, telephone lines, electrical conduits or systems, gas mains, television cables and fiber optic cables), drainage systems or structures and street lights (in the case of an easement area adjoining a Street only). The grantees utilizing such facilities shall bear all costs related to the installation, operation, maintenance, repair and replacement of such easement facilities, shall repair to the original specifications any damage to the surface resulting from such use and shall provide as -built plans for all such facilities to the Owner of all lots upon which such utility lines and facilities are located within thirty (30) days after the date of completion of construction of same. Each Owner agrees to grant such additional easements as are reasonably required by any public or private utility for the purpose of providing the utility lines and facilities described herein provided such easement are not otherwise inconsistent with the provisions of this Declaration. 6.3.2 Sign Easement. The Owner of as shown on the official plat thereof recorded in the official records of Ada County, Idaho, hereby grants to the Declarant and such other owners of Building Sites in the Center as may be designated by the Declarant, as grantees, for the benefit of the Lots and Building Sites owned by same an easement under, through and across a portion of said for the installation, operation, maintenance, repair and replacement of one (1) permanent free-standing sign and all utility lines and facilities appurtenant thereto and temporary marketing signs announcing that Building Sites are available for sale or rent. Such signs shall generally be located near the southeast corner of said Lot , Block , in a location mutually acceptable to Declarant and the Owner said Lot , Block The design of the permanent free-standing sign structure and the sign fascia used thereon shall be subject to the approval of the Committee. The design of temporary marketing signs shall not be subject to approval of the Committee. ARTICLE 7 DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS The following requirements shall apply to the development and improvement of each Building Site and shall constitute restrictions on the property in the Center. 7.1 Site Related Requirements. 7. 1.1 Required Setbacks. All Buildings shall be setback the following minimum distances: A. From property lines abutting Road - B. From property lines abutting C. From property lines abutting all other Streets - twenty feet (20'). D. From property lines not fronting on a Street - five feet (5) for side yards and twenty feet (20') for rear yards. Subject to the approval of the Committee, underground Building components such as storage tanks or vaults may be placed within the setbacks areas. 7.1.2 Screening of Service Facilities and Storage Areas. Garbage and refuse containers shall be contained within Buildings or other enclosed structures, or shall be concealed by means of shrubbery or solid screening walls or fences of no less than four feet (4') in height of material similar to and compatible with that of the Building. Fuel and other storage tanks and bins shall be installed underground wherever practicable or screened from public view. No materials, supplies, or movable equipment (including, without limitation, fleet automobiles parked overnight) shall be stored in any area on a Building Site except inside a closed Building or behind a visible barrier which screens same so they are not visible from neighboring Building Sites or Streets. Such screening walls, barriers and fences shall be integrated into the Building and site plans and designed so as not to attract attention and shall be inconspicuously located. 7.1.3 Exterior Lighting. All exterior and security lighting shall have underground service, and shall be designed, erected, altered and maintained by the Owner and Occupant of the Building Site on which it is located, and shall be compatible and harmonious throughout the Center. 7.1.4 Drainage. The Owner of each Building Site shall submit to the Committee a drainage plan in conjunction with Building and site plans. The drainage plan shall be certified by a licensed engineer qualified in drainage design. Building Site drainage E Improvements shall be designed so as to limit surface water discharge from a building Site to a rate not to exceed the discharge resulting from a twenty-five (25) year storm under pre - development (natural) conditions. 7.1.5 Open Space/Landscaping. Open Area shall equal or exceed ten percent (10%) of the gross land area of each Building Site, and shall be landscaped. Each Owner or Occupant within the Center shall be responsible for the construction, installation and maintenance of functional and aesthetically suitable Landscaping on the Building Site. Such Landscaping shall be installed only after complete Landscaping Plans therefor have been submitted to and approved by the Committee. Landscaping shall be capable of preventing soil erosion under normal surface runoff conditions. Earthen berms at least three feet (3') in height shall shield all parking areas from view from the surrounding Streets. Approved Landscaping shall be installed within six (6) months of issuance of a Certificate of occupancy for the Building, weather permitting. 7.1.6 Easement Areas. Within the easement areas reserved on the plat(s) of the Center, no structure or planting or other Improvement shall be placed or permitted to remain which may damage or interfere with the installation, operation or maintenance of utilities for which the easement was intended. 7.1.7 Driveways. The design and location of driveway cuts onto Street shall be approved by the Committee. 7.1.8 Fences. No fence shall exceed eight feet (8') in height. Unless otherwise approved by the Committee, any fence visible from a Street shall be constructed of materials similar to or compatible with those materials used in the Building. Chain link fences are discouraged but, upon a proper showing of need and compatibility, may be allowed upon Committee approval. 7.2 Building Related Requirements. 7.2.1 Temporary Structures. No temporary Building or other temporary structures shall be permitted on any Building, equipment, materials and the like shall be permitted for construction purposes during the construction period of a permanent Building. Such temporary structures, equipment and materials shall be removed not later than thirty (30) days after the date of substantial completion of the permanent Buildings. 7.2.2 Exterior Materials, Colors. Architecturally and aesthetically suitable Building materials shall be applied to or used on all sides of a Building which is visible to the general public and shall be harmonious and compatible with colors of the natural surroundings and other adjacent Buildings. Unless otherwise approved by the Committee, steel shall not be an acceptable exterior material. 7.2.3 Height Limits. No Building (including any equipment installed thereon) 10 shall exceed forty feet (401) in height. 7.2.4 Utilities - Mechanical Equipment - Roof Projections. A. All utilities, including electrical, water, sanitary, sewer, storm drainage, gas and telephone, shall be underground. Pad -mounted transformers, switchgear and similar equipment which must be installed above -ground shall be screened with suitable Landscaping consistent with the requirements of the utility provider. B. All mechanical equipment shall be located or screened so as not to be visible to the general public from Streets, or from the front view of other Building Sites. Mechanical equipment screening walls shall be of design and materials compatible with those of the Building. Antennae shall be visually masked to the extent practicable and consistent with operation requirements. 7.3 Signs. The locations, type, size, design and material of all Signs shall be approved in writing by the Committee. Only the following types of Signs are allowed: 7.3.1 Public necessity signs identifying danger or hazard on or near the Building Site or Building. 7.3.2 Property Signs offering the property for sale or lease, or announcing contemplated Improvements. 7.3.3 Signs identifying the Owner or Occupant of Buildings. 7.3.4 Service Signs giving information to the public such as directions to parking facilities. 7.4 Noxious Uses. No trades, services or activities shall be conducted on Building Sites within the Center nor shall anything else be done thereon which may be or become an annoyance or nuisance to the Owner or Occupants of adjacent properties, including, without limitation, by reason of unsightliness, excessive emission of fumes, odors, glare, vibration, gases, radiation, electrical disturbance, fire hazard, dust, liquid waste, smoke, debris, water pollution, air pollution or noise. - 7.5 Construction Requirements. 7.5.1 Site Preparation. All Building Sites are to be cleared and excavated in a workmanlike manner with consideration for surrounding Building Site Owners and Occupants. All dirt and debris not to be used in construction are to be removed from the Center or stockpiled in an assigned location approved by the Committee. 7.5.2 General Damages. The Owner and the Owner's agents shall be 11 responsible for repairs of any damage which may occur during excavation to sidewalks, Streets, utilities or other existing Improvements on or off the Building Site. Owner and their agents shall inspect any Improvements installed by Declarant prior to commencement of construction and report any problems to the Committee. Unless otherwise notified prior tp commencement of construction, any Improvements installed by Declarant shall be considered in good repair and all damages occurring during construction will be the responsibility of the Owner and the Owner's agents. Said repairs shall be made immediately upon occurrence. 7.5.3 Construction Maintenance. Job sites are to be kept as clean as possible during construction. All dirt, nails, gravel and other building materials must be promptly removed from streets and sidewalks. No materials are allowed to be kept on adjoining Building Sites. Street and curbs shall be protected at all times. All construction sites must be free of materials and debris prior to each weekend. Dumpsters are the responsibility of the Owner and shall be located as designated by the Committee. Said facilities are to be kept orderly at all times and emptied or serviced on a timely basis. 7.6 Variances. The Declarant, or any Owner or prospective Owner, may apply to the Committee for a variance in the development requirement set forth in this Declaration, for purposes of the development and improvement of a particular Building Site. The Committee may grant or deny such application for a change or a variance, subject to the following conditions. 7.6.1 The change or variance sought must be due to extraordinary or exceptional circumstances, be reasonable and not impose a hardship on adjoining Building Sites. 7.6.2 The granting of a variance by the Committee shall not be deemed as a wavier to any provision of this Declaration beyond the particular situation for which the variance is granted. ARTICLE 8 APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 8.1 Procedure and Controls. All submissions to the Committee for approvals required by this Declaration shall be made in accordance with this Article 8. In the event the Committee fails to approve or disapprove a proposal within thirty (30) days after said proposal has been submitted in such form as may be required by the Committee, the Applicant may deliver to the Committee a written notice of inaction. Should the Committee fail to respond within five (5) days of receipt of the notice of inaction, the Applicant may consider the proposal approved, except in the case of a variance request which shall be considered disapproved. All references to days in this Section shall mean business days. 8.2 Rules and Regulations/Guidelines. The Committee is hereby empowered to 12 adopt rules and regulations to govern procedures, including such rules as the Committee may deem appropriate and in keeping with the spirit of due process of law. The Committee is further hereby empowered to adopt guidelines as it shall deem appropriate and consistent with the provisions of this Declaration, with regard to matters subject to the Committee's approval, including matters of design, materials and aesthetic interest. 8.3 Fees. The Committee may establish, by its adopted rules and regulations, a fee schedule to be paid by each Owner or Occupant submitting plans and specifications to the Committee for approval. No submission for approval shall be considered complete until any such fee has been paid. Such fee shall not exceed such reasonable amount as may be required to reimburse the Committee for the costs of professional review of submittals. 8.4 Application Requirements. All proposals submitted for approval must contain the following: 8.4.1 Site Plan. Complete Building Site plan showing the exterior perimeter of the Building Site, proposed location of all structures, parking areas, utilities, loading areas, trackage, driveways, walkways, Signs, easements, setbacks, storage, Landscaping, trash areas and storage tanks. 8.4.2 Architectural Plan. Complete set of architectural plans and elevations showing Building elevations, ground floor plans with finished floor elevations, building materials and colors, brief description of mechanical, electrical and structural systems, including the treatment of screening of all mechanical equipment and mechanical screen details, elevations, etc., and exterior site lighting (including fixture selection). 8.4.3 Site Engineering Plan. Complete engineering plans showing surface draining and grading; utility connections; above-ground utilities and appurtenances; means, methods and devices to protect existing pavements, curbs, Landscaping and other existing Improvements; and exterior lighting including the signage. 8.4.4 Physical Inspection. Statement of a date when the Committee can make a physical on-site inspection for the purpose of viewing and approving the layout of the proposed structure on the Building Site. 8.4.5 Use. A description of the proposed uses of the Building Site and any accessory uses and a comment on their suitability under the provisions of this Declaration and the ordinances of the City of Meridian. 8.4.6 Signage Plan. Complete plans and specifications for all signage including all sign fascia and Sign structures. 8.4.7 Other. Any other information which may be reasonably required by the Committee in order to ensure compliance with the requirements contained herein. 13 Committee. 8.4.8 Fee. Payment of any Development Review Fee required by the 8.5 Submittals. All submissions to the Committee shall be in duplicate originals and addressed or delivered to: or any such address as the Declarant shall hereafter designate in writing by notice addressed to the Owners and Occupants. 8.5.1 Upon receipt of approval from the Committee, the Owner or Occupant shall diligently proceed with the approved work. If the work is not commenced within one (1) year from the date of approval, then the approval shall automatically expire. Upon the showing of hardship or cause by the Owner, the Committee may, in writing, extend the one (l) year time period. Once commenced, all work shall be diligently prosecuted to completion. 8.5.2 Approval of plans by the Declarant or the Committee may be secured prior to the acquisition of a Building Site pursuant to the terms of a sale contract. 8.6 Revisions. In the event an Owner or Occupant desires to deviate from an approved proposal, the Owner or Occupant shall submit a revised application indicating the proposed changes from the approved proposal. Said revised application will be reviewed and approved or disapproved in the same manner as an original application. ARTICLE 9 MAINTENANCE 9.1 Owner Responsibility. Each Owner and Occupant shall be responsible for keeping the Building Site (whether or not improved), Buildings and other Improvements, including, without limitation, Lawn and Landscaping, maintained in a safe, clean, neat and orderly condition and shall prevent rubbish, unused equipment or machinery and the like from accumulating on the Building Site. 9.2 Track and Streets. Such maintenance shall include any railroad track areas within Building Sites and all Streets and sidewalks adjacent to each Building Site that are not maintained by local, county or state governments. 14 ARTICLE 10 ENFORCENIE TT 10.1 Forbearance. Enforcement of the provisions of this Declaration shall be by an appropriate proceeding at law or in equity against any person, corporation or other entity violating or attempting to violate such provisions, either to restrain such violation, to enforce liability, or to recover damages, or by any appropriate proceeding at law or in equity against the land to enforce any lien or charge arising by virtue thereof. The Declarant and the Committee shall not be liable for enforcement or for failure to enforce said provisions. Failure of the Declarant, the Committee, or any Owner or Occupant to enforce any of the provisions of this Declaration shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so. 10.2 Nuisance. The result of every action or omission whereby any restriction or covenant herein contained is violated in whole or in part is hereby declared to be and to constitute a nuisance, and every remedy allowed by law or equity against any Owner or Occupant creating or allowing a nuisance shall be applicable against every such result and may be exercised by the Declarant or by any Owner or Occupant. 10.3 Attorneys Fees. In any legal or equitable proceeding for the enforcement or to restrain the violation of this Declaration, or any provision hereof, the party or parties judged to be in violation shall pay the attorneys' fees of the prevailing party or parties, in such amount as may be fixed by the court in such proceeding. All remedies provided herein or the law or in equity shall be cumulative and not exclusive. 10.4 Inspection. After reasonable notice to an Owner, the Declarant and any member of the Committee may from time to time at any reasonable hour or hours enter and inspect any portion of a Building Site to ascertain compliance with this Declaration. 10.5 Self -Help. In the event the Owner or Occupant fails to comply with the provisions of this Declaration, the Committee, at its sole discretion, may notify said Owner or Occupant of such noncompliance in writing, detailing any and all work which must be performed by said Owner or Occupant to bring said Building or Building Site into compliance with this Declaration. If said Owner or Occupant fails to perform such work within thirty (30) days after receipt of notice of noncompliance, then, and in that event, the Committee may perform any and all necessary work detailed in the noncompliance notice and submit all costs and expenses therefor to said Owner or Occupant for prompt payment. If said Owner or Occupant fails to reimburse the Committee for such work within thirty (30) days thereafter, the Committee may collect all such costs and expenses through any appropriate proceeding at law or in equity or may file against the property of said Owner or Occupant a real property lien in an adequate amount to cover all costs and expenses incurred by the Committee in connection with said work, and 15 foreclose said lien, in like manner, as a mortgage on real property under Idaho law. Said lien shall be subordinate to all mortgages and deeds of trust of record at the time a notice of said lien is first filed of record. ARTICLE 11 NOTICE TO BE GIVEN BY OWNERS Any Owner of a Building Site who shall transfer any title to or create any right of occupancy of such Building Site or portions thereof, shall give written notice to the Committee of the identity of the new Owner of Occupant and shall give said new Owner or Occupant notice of the requirements of this Declaration. ARTICLE 12 COMPLIANCE WITH LAW Zoning ordinances, building codes, fire codes and any other governmental laws and regulations applicable to Building Sites in the Center including, without limitation, all federal, state and local laws relating to the handling, storage and disposal of hazardous wastes, shall be observed. In the event of any conflict between this Declaration and any such governmental laws and regulations, the more restrictive standards shall apply. Any approval given by the Committee and any variance granted shall not in any way relieve Owners and Occupants from obtaining approvals required by any governmental body having jurisdiction, including, without limitation, the Ada County Highway District, the City of Meridian and any irrigation districts within which the Center is located. Each Owner or Occupant shall give written notice to the Declarant and the Committee of any violation or alleged violation of such laws and regulations related to the Building Site of such Owner or Occupant, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Declarant and the Members of the Committee from and against all claims, liabilities, losses and costs of any kind arising out of a failure to comply with any such laws and regulations. ARTICLE 13 MORTGAGES, DEEDS OF TRUST Breach of any provision of this Declaration shall not defeat or render invalid the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value with respect to property within the Center, but said provision shall be binding upon and effective against any Owner of said premises whose title thereto is acquired by foreclosure, trustee's sale or otherwise. ARTICLE 14 16 -A*., SEVERABILITY Invalidation of any one or more of the provisions of this Declaration by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any of the remaining provisions, which shall remain in full force and effect. ARTICLE 15 DURATION AND MODIFICATION; MULTIPLE OWNERS 15.1 Duration. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions set forth in this Declaration shall run with and bind the land within the Center, and shall remain in effect, and shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Declarant, the Owners, the Occupants, and the Committee for a term of fifty (50) years from the date this Declaration is recorded. The rights specific to Blue Cross shall not be assignable. The provisions of this Declaration shall automatically extend for consecutive periods of ten (10) years each, unless at any time after the commencement of an extension period, Declarant (so long as the Declarant owns any real property or any interest in part of the Center), or the Owners by a two-thirds (2/3) vote (if the Declarant no longer owns any such interest), execute and record a termination agreement terminating the provisions of this Declaration. 15.2 Modification, Termination. This Declaration may be amended or terminated by the Declarant so long as the Declarant owns a minimum of five (5) acres in the Center, and otherwise by a three-quarters (3/4) vote (with each lot in the Center owned by Declarant and each Building Site owned by others being entitled to one [1] vote). Amendments to or terminating of this Declaration shall be by an instrument in writing, properly executed, acknowledged and recorded with the Ada County Recorder. If any Building Site is owned by Blue Cross, its approval shall also be required for any amendment or termination of this Declaration. 15.3 Multiple Orders. The Owners (if consisting of more than one [ I ] person or entity) of each Building Site shall agree among themselves and designate in writing to the Committee a single person or entity who is entitled to act (i.e., vote, consent, approve, etc.) Under this Declaration for that Building Site. If the Owners of any such Building Site cannot agree who shall be entitled to act for that Building Site within thirty (30) days after receipt of request for same from any other Owner or member of the Committee, then that Building Site shall not be entitled to act under this Declaration, any provision in this Declaration to the contrary notwithstanding. Without limiting the foregoing, in the event a Building Site is not entitled to act hereunder, it shall be disregarded for the purpose of applying the requirements set forth in Section 15.2. The obligations under this Declaration of multiple Owners of a single Building Site shall be joint and several. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant has caused this instrument to be signed by its 17 duly authorized officers and its corporate seal to be affixed hereto on the date first above written. SIGNATURES: 18 EXHIBIT "A" y ; ?t�Part of the Northwest quarter of Section 20, Township 3 Korth, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the quarter section corner'between Sections 17 and:20; Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian; thence South 0014' East 2,645.6 feet to the center of said Section 20; thence South 89018' West 944.0 feet to the center of a lateral; thence traversing along the center of said lateral North 39033' West 232.0 feet to a point; thence North 12044' West 626.0 feet to a point; thence North 54038' West 570.0 feet to a point; thence North 14006' West 202.0 feet to a point; thence North 21036' West 48.0 feet to a point; thence North 11050' West 150.0 feet to a point; thence North 8016' West 150.0 feet to a point; thence North 5006' West 150.0 feet to a point; thence • North 13002' West 150.0 feet to a point; thence North 19055' West 450.0 feet to a point; thence - North 16024' West 122.0 feet to a point; thence North 8048' West 150.0 feet to a point on the North boundary of said Section 20; thence North 139031' East 2,062.0 feet to the'REAL POINT Or BEGINNING. -4+r*.4998 1:18PM Ameri,ii Lied Titre Wf QUITCLAIM DEED 03:. (,)k -u5 ('—, F. J3 For Value Received Pam Stainaclurt� i XX H r nett who accquired title as Pam Ste nec er , an unmarrM person do hereby convey, relaass, romisa and Gsever quit eiaim unto Ovetlaad 16 LLC whom current address is 6223 North D16cev9r7 Nay, Boise, Idaho 83713 the following dewAibad premises, to -wit: Sae attached Exhiyi,t "A" AMERICAN LAND TITLE �Ci1Ro�o- RE�UESr ADA COUNTY RECORDER J. BOfSE. UAHOROdQ � SEE QEPUTY1 1998HY-7 Prl3-44 9804409 b+',et Malmo do Wmffl„odaflim". It bay M tm *W 0 to b exehiftn, insurabil ty or aflect on tl>te. f toQather with their aDportenancea. Dated: April 30, 1998 Pan Stsineekert Hartnett ;. y Y STATE OF MARC. COUNZY OF, . � ft 3[� �, fr - togs WON ma, a notart gablk_in atd for $eay; D�aearRs' loPPdld Pam StaiaecUr 45 ' 'r , •�- �" � -;L ��., "'nit �': ';•��; `-' .'Z. Icaoi+y b ma be }�1! •••frill sa>Meribad'?to tL� ala tll�t. a ��.` V I . , Or. 30. 1958 1 18PY Amer:, -In Lane Til..Ha. 0835 P, ' ti, 3 EXHIBIT A BEOIMING AT THE SECTION CORNER COMMON TO 9SCTlow 3.7, 18, 19 Alia 20, IN TOWNSHIP 3 bMRTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE M=I im, ADA COUNTY, IDAKOr THEKCS NORTH 69.31' EAST 593 FSHT TO A POINT IN THE CW MR OF A LATER.0 OF RIDMMAUGH CANAL; TRSNC' DOWN THE CENTER OF SAID LATERAL SOUTH 4049' EAST 150 FST; THSNCB SOUTH 36024' BAST 111 FEET; THMfC8 SOUTH 19055' BAST 450 MT; THMfCE SOUTH 13002', EAST 150 YM: THENCE SOM 5006' EAST 130 FST; THENCE SOUTH 0016' RUT 150 FST; THMICS SOUTH 11.50' EAST 130 FMI THENCE SOUTH 21.36' EAST 40 FIXTI TKCMCE LRAVING 5A.ID LATZRAL, SOUTH $9425' WEST 923 FMi THENCE NORTH 1,320.1 FEET TO THE SAID PLACE OF Lzal TING. EXCAPTXNG TRSIFROM THE FOLLOKNO DESCRIHED PARCEL: A PARCEL OF LAND nt TS NOR7`HMRST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOi1MIP 3 WORT. RAMX 1 EAST, OF TRX BOISE MBRIDLAN, ADA COVNTy, IDAHO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED As FOLLOWS: COM WCING AT THE NORTHYAST CORNER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANOH 1 EAST, BOISE MnIDIIW; THENCE SOUTH 4034'14• 'AST 1,324.09 PREP ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SRCTION 30 TO THE NORTBWEST CORNER OF RIM VIEW SMZVISION; TRENCH NORTH 09059'190 EAST 25.00 FLET ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF RIM VIEW SUBDIVISION TO A POINT ON TRE EASTSRI.Y RIGHT-OF-WAY OF LOCUST GROVE ROAD. THE REAL POINT OP 9,SGIb== OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE NORTH 0034'140 EAST 35?.59 FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIORT-OF-WAY TO A POIMT; THENCE NORTH 09.39'19' BAST 024.96 FEST TO A POINJ• ON TIM GSNTSRLINB Or THE HUZITER LATERALt ALONG SA -Ib CSN=LINS THE FOLLOWING; THENCE SOUTH 5031'22P HAST 47.1$ FEET TO A POINT; T$ENCE SOUTH $030'22" EAST 217,92 ?SET TO A P0nff; TgZb= SOUTH 16011'230 MAST 94.94 FEET TO TBR NORTHEAST CORNER OF RIM VIZW SUBDIVISION; TBSCE 500TH 09.59'190 NEST 492.07 FRET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF RIK VIEW SUWIVISION TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTI08. r", REVISED DESCNPMIJ PAU :021001614 0408161school,dQ ;�`- ,a-�`'€y✓ � � psi ` T ., rz=y, .,,z` r x �s ,�- �� ,'aa�`t. '3#�fi t s y��afir", � KIY.�"� r 3 S Thenoe N 15'36'19" 1111215,00 feet to thetinortheast comer of Rim View Subdivision, Continuing along the centerline of the Hunter Leiters! the followingsours es and distances, . Tha�i11$t�16t to a Point;_ y g qg oe N 01}'33'19 Then " W217.21 feet tc apoint, Thenoe N 05`79'17" W 1617.79 feet to a point, r tit to�►�i�o� a line parallel with the north tine of the NW 114 - ��6� tea` �a3loWing-��ac�ribati parcel; A tmt►1sk W-btin 20, Township 3 Na Mer�an; d;ounty, ideho�articularly described as foliowsRanpe l East, B Cammencina at'tha mr1h 41L tiQ�1 0116 Feb -03-00 04:11P Foley, & Freeman 1208885130 P.01 C O V E R FOLEY & FREEMAN, CHARTERED P.O. Box 10 77 E. Idaho, Suite 300 Meridian, Idaho 83642 (208)888-9111 S H E E T (208)888-5130 Fax To: Meridian City Planning & Zoning Department Attn: Brad Fax 4: (208) 888-6854 Subject: G. L. Voigt Development Application for Plat of Joint School District No. 2 ("Meridian School District") Parcel Date: February 3, 2000 Pages: Dour (4), including this page. Dear Brad: As you are aware, I represent the Meridian School District. Pursuant to our telephone conversation this afternoon, transmitted herewith please find the Affidavit of Legal Interest which was executed by Christine Donnell on behalf of the Meridian School District. As I indicated during my call, this affidavit is being submitted for the sole purpose of allowing the Applicant to plat my client's school site property, and should not be construed in any manner as my client's agreement with, or consent to, any of the Applicant's other applications regarding property located in the vicinity of the school site. Sincerely, reeman, Chartered M Yreeman The information contained in this facsimile message is privileged or confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is neither allowed nor intended. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone at the above number, and return the original message to us at the above address via the U.S. Postal Service. Thank you. ORIGINAL WILL NOT BE MAILED Fzb-03-00 04:11P Foley & Freeman 120,EJ8885130 AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss COUNTY OF ADA ) Joint School District No. 2, located at 911 Meridian Street, Meridian, Idaho 83642, by and through Superintendent Christine Donnell, being duly sworn upon oath, deposes and says: 1. Joint School District No. 2 is the record owner of the property described in the attached Exhibit "A". 2. Joint School District No. 2 grants permission to G. L. Voigt Development, of P. O. Box 2044, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83403, to submit the accompanying Plat application pertaining to the real property described in the attached Exhibit ({ 11 A. Dated this day of January, 2000. JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 By: Christine Donnell, Sdperintendent SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. IF III urrniuurUna. d Notary Pu is for Idaho Residing: Commission Expires" 4 � 11/cr, Feb -03-00 04:12P Foley & Freeman 120„8885130 P_03 EXHIBIT "A" A parcel of land lying in the Northwest Quarter of Section 20, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the North 1/4 corner of Section 20, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise, Meridian, thence South 0024116" West 849.15 feet along the East line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 20 to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence South 00024116" West 1,796.28 feet to the Southeast corner of the Northwest Quarter (center 1/4 corner); thence South 89115515811 West 946.95 feet along the South line of the Northwest Quarter to a point on the centerline of the Hunter Lateral; along the centerline of the Hunter Lateral the following courses and distances; thence North 38029136" West 241.86 feet to a point; thence North 06006140" West 42.59 feet to a point; thence North 11033107" West 554.27 feet to the Southeast corner of Rim View Subdivision, filed in Book 43 of Plats at Page 3477, records of Ada County; along the East boundary of Rim View Subdivision and continuing along the centerline of the Hunter Lateral the following courses and distances; thence Northwesterly along a curve to the left 33.20 feet, said curve having a radius of 72.06 feet, a central angle of 26°24'01", tangents of 16.90 feet, and a chord of 32.91 feet which bears North 40058137" West; thence North 54010137" West 543.31 feet to a point; thence North 15036119" West 215.00 feet to the Northeast corner of Rim View Subdivision; continuing along the centerline of the Hunter Lateral the following courses and distances; thence North 16°10'37" West 98.91 feet to a point; thence North 08033119" West 217.21 feet to a point; thence North 05029117" West 167.79 feet to a point; thence South 89°52'19" East 1,821.57 feet along a line parallel with the North line of the Northwest Quarter to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following described parcel: A parcel of land lying in the Northwest Quarter of Section 20, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the North quarter corner of Section 20, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian; thence continued Feb -03-00 04:12P Fold & Freeman 120jk8885130 P.04 LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTINUED South 0024116" West 2,334.43 feet along the East line of the Northwjst Quarter of said Section 20, to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence South 00024116" West 311.00 feet to the Southeast corner of the Northwest Quarter (center 1/4 corner); thence South 89°55'58" West 562.00 feet along the South line of the Northwest Quarter to a point; thence North 00024'1611 East 311.00 feet along a line parallel with the East line of the Northwest Quarter to a point; thence South 89055'58" East 562.00 feet along a line parallel with the South line of the Northwest Quarter to BEGINNING. the REAL POINT OF Jan -03-00 04:36P VOIGT-DAVIS REALTORS . .. � •• •,,-,• an+cwa e,wi+'�ttKlrw, 1rK.. 208^ 29-0882 1208345950 STATE OF t COUNTY OF That i AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST ss ) (nafFie) (address) �� ii5 �- �C•�___ being first duly sworn upon (state) oath, depose and say-, P.02 P. 02 the record owner and/or representative of the property described on the attached, I grant my permission to submit the accompanying application pertaining to that property_ this -day day of L .lam- J 40- div (S' ature) SUBSCRiSED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. P�GtA,.A.,.d���1 VXOTARy iAUBL�G; vo Notary Public fpr ldah Residing at My Commission Expires: -li-- 0 1 JAN -0? -2000 i6.00 208 529 0882 TOTAL P.02 G;; P-02 Jan -04-00 09:34A The West Co JHN—W—dVM 1J !77 :NC l l.]1.7J G'IV i t'CCrt 1 i'�V r a� w. 1 ` STATE OF f HO } COUNTY OF DAss } I, (name) That I Dated 2088889947 P-02 AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST /. (address) ;Ky) being first duly sworn upon (state) oath, depose and say-- the ay_ the record owner and/or representative of the property described on the attached, I grant my permission to submit the accompanying application pertaining to that property. �3 day of (S' r SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to beforse me the day and year first above written_ Al tiA L. 6 '•., .•'� 41ti'•..•••... is SOT Aliis r • MP is •I�•` •••.N.••••�V,�,,� TE OF lq •`' a NotAry Public for Idaho Residing at ins° r, c a ,. NAY Commission Expires: 2 96% TOTAL P.02 P.0-, ADA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PHONE: (208) 364-2277 650 MAIN STREET, BOISE, IDAHO 83702 9 FAX: (208) 364-2406 BUILDING • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • ZONING January 3, 2000 Becky Bowcutt Briggs Engineering Inc 1800 W Overland Road Boise ID 83705-3142 RE: Subdivision Name Reservation - RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION Dear Becky: At your request I will reserve the name "RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION" for you to use for your project. I can honor this reservation only as long as your project is in the approval process. Final approval can only take place when the final plat is recorded. Sincerely, John E. Priester, P.E.L.S. County Engineer JP/gip 0 SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET Proposed Development Name Resolution Subdivision File # Date Reviewed 1/11/00 Preliminary Stage XX Final Engineer/Developer Briggs Engineering, Becky Bowcut The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Boise City Street Name Ordinance. The following streets are existing and the names shall appear on the plat: "OVERLAND RD." and "S. LOCUST GROVE RD." The following street names are approved for this development and shall be placed on the reserved list: "S. MILLENNIUM WAY" "S. CELEBRATION AVE." "E. GALA ST." "E. Y2K LANE" and " S. RESOLUTION LANE" The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COQ:N 'i STREET NAMi� COMMITTEE EN Y R a ESENTA7IVES OR i�ESd g�EES Ada County Engineer John Priester Date f -/ 3 —p7 Community Planning Assoc. Sue Hansen ✓V_ ' Date / -/ 3 - o d City of Meridian Cheryl Sable Date Meridian Fire District Representative24- Date NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed 1111 Subindex Street Index Section NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS d/L,, 1/31ew TR%SUBSXSM_CITY.FRM AFFIDAVIT OF ACCURACY STATE OF IDAHO ) COUNTY OF ADA ) I, Beck Bowcutt Briggs Engineering Inc. 1800 W. Overland Road (name) (address) Boise Idaho being first duly sworn upon (city) (state) oath, depose and say: That I prepared the attached applications and the information contained is true and correct. (Preliminary Plat, Annexation, Re -zone, Conditional Use and Planned Unit Development) Dated this day of �r� ��' 2000 (Signature) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. ',,11/......ire.,. .••as's A 10V1 S'°•. $pTARr i AU B L1G 010 1 \affid-accuracy of ry Public for Idaho Residing at :�,� My Commission Expires: t7 -,Z'3 -�Zn.5 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF IDAHO ) ss COUNTY OF ADA ) I, Donna Wilson Briggs Engineering Inc. 1800 W. Overland Rd. (name) (address) Boise ID , being first duly sworn upon (city) (state) oath, depose and say: I will personally post the subject property with the hearing notice sign one week prior to the public hearing for the (annexation, rezone, conditional use, and preliminary plat of Resolution Subdivision). Dated this day of o SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. .•'• 'jSR MOp , {01 AR r 'Womp co * PU0v"N09 O 0101\affid-posting Notary PuHfic for Idaho Residing at 1 My Commission Expires: -1-21') - SUBDIVISION: Resolution Subdivision BOOK/PAGE: RECORDED DATE: INSTRUMENT #: DRAFT DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS & RESTRICTIONS FOR RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS 1.1 Building 1.2 Building Site 1.3 Center 1.4 Committee 1.5 Declaration 1.6 Improvements 1.7 Landscaping 1.8 Lawns 1.9 Occupant 1.10 Open Space 1.11 Owner 1.12 Sign 1.13 Street ARTICLE 2 RECITALS 2.1 Owner 2.2 Benefit ARTICLE 3 DECLARATIONS ARTICLE 4 PURPOSE 4.1 Protection 4.2 Improvements 4.3 Parking 4.4 Aesthetics .-. Page No. 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 ARTICLE 5 CONTROL COMMITTEE 6 5.1 Establishment and Appointment of Members 6 5.2 Term 6 5.3 Chairman 6 5.4 Voting 6 5.5 Control 7 5.6 Limitations and Effect of Actions 7 5.7 Certificate of Compliance 7 5.8 Liability of Committee 7 ARTICLE 6 LAND USE/ EASEMENTS 6.1 Building Sites 6.2 Land Division 2 7 7 7 6.3 Easements ARTICLE 7 DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 7.1 Site Related Requirements 7.2 Building Related Requirements 7.3 Signs 7.4 Noxious Uses 7.5 Construction Requirements 7.6 Variances 8 9 9 11 11 11 11 12 ARTICLE 8 APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 12 8.1 Procedure and Controls 12 8.2 Rules and Regulations/Guidelines 12 8.3 Fees 13 8.4 Application Requirements 13 8.5 Submittals 14 8.6 Revisions 14 ARTICLE 9 MAINTENANCE 14 9.1 Owner Responsibility 14 9.2 Track and Streets 14 ARTICLE 10 ENFORCEMENT 15 10.1 Forbearance 15 10.2 Nuisance 15 10.3 Attorneys Fees 15 10.4 Inspection 15 10.5 Self -Help 15 ARTICLE 11 NOTICE TO BE GIVEN BY OWNERS 16 ARTICLE 12 COMPLIANCE WITH LAW 16 ARTICLE 13 MORTGAGES, DEEDS OF TRUST 16 ARTICLE 14 SEVERABILITY 16 ARTICLE 15 DURATION AND MODIFICATION; MULTIPLE OWNERS 17 15.1 Duration 17 15.2 Modification, Termination 17 3 A DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY JANUARY 28, 2000 SUBMITTED T0: CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 E. IDAHO AVE. MERIDIAN, ID 83642 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT 318 E. 37TH ST. BOISE, ID 83714 DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. 777 HEARTHSTONE DR., BOISE, ID 83702 (208)345-3290 RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Study Objectives The purpose of this study is to asses the traffic impacts resulting from the development of the Resolution Subdivision in Meridian, Idaho, and to evaluate the capacity of the road system to accommodate the site -generated traffic. The study format conforms to ACHD standards for a Transportation Impact Study (TIS.) On -Site Development The Resolution Subdivision is planned for construction on a 50 acre site on the south side of Overland Road east of Locust Grove Road. The mixed use development will include apartment units, an ice skating arena, specialty retail space and professional offices. A summary of the proposed development program is shown in Table 1. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 2 Table 1 Resolution Subdivision Shopping Center 145,000 sf Office 125,000 sf Ice Arena 57,000 sf Day Care Center 19,000 sf Apartments 200 dwelling units In addition to this site development program, a new public high school (approximately 1600 students) will be constructed south of the Resolution Subdivision. Illustrated in Figure 1 is a general vicinity map showing the proposed site plan and arterial roadways. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. FIGURE 1 RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION VICINITY MAP NORTH Traffic Study Prepared BY DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. 777 HowWA e Or Bd.m IG 137M 343-3M RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 3 PROJECTED TRAFFIC Traffic and Circulation The current average daily traffic volumes on the major roadways in the general vicinity of the subject property are listed in Table 2. Table 2 Existing Traffic Volumes Average Daily Traffic: Vehicles per Day: Date of Count: Meridian Road North of Overland Road 28,834 11/96 Eagle Road North of Overland Road 21,289 6/99 Overland Road East of Locust Grove Road 11,230 7/98 Overland Road West of Locust Grove Road 10,054 7/98 Locust Grove Road South of Overland Road" 3,500 1/00 'Estimated from peak hour Meridian Road (SH 69) is a principal arterial connecting the central business areas of Kuna and Meridian with the interstate highway system. The Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection is signalized, and all approach roads Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 4 — have protected left -turn lanes. Meridian Road has a 5 lane section, and the posted speed limit is 55 mph on Meridian Road and 45 mph on Overland Road. Overland Road is a minor arterial with bike lane designation. It currently has a two lane section and 4 ft. shoulders. The ACHD Five Year Work Program includes reconstructing Overland Road to a five lane section. This work should be completed by year 2005. Locust Grove Road is a 2 lane section line road. The 2020 Regional Transportation Plan includes a new Interstate 84 highway overpass connection for Locust Grove Road between Overland and Franklin Roads. In January of 2000, Overland Road and Locust Grove Road turning movement counts were made by Dobie Engineering, Inc. Additional average daily counts were obtained from ITD and ACRD. Figures 2 and 3 show the existing PM peak hour turning movements at the site intersections. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. CELEBRATION BUSINESS PARK FIGURE 2 — LOCATION: Overland Road and Meridian Road CONDITION: Existing Conditions (1999) DATE: May 27, 1999 PM PEAK HOUR (4:30-5:30pm) — N A MERIDIAN RD. I - 2200 I 1295 905 225 — 850 1 220 — I I 210 485 210 OVERLAND RD. I I I 225 < I I "---- 210 _ 430 190 v I <---- 190 580 15 > v---- 180 — 780 < 935 210 ----" I ^ 220 — 350 105 ----> 1 1 105 355 35 ----v I I > 30 35 850 180 15 I I I 485 OVERLAND RD. 30 -- 1065 530 — 1595 MERIDIAN RD. — FILE: 9981 M Source: DEI CELEBRATION BUSINESS PARK FIGURE 3 — LOCATION: Overland Road and Locust Grove Road CONDITION: Existing Conditions (2000) DATE: January 4, 2000 (Tuesday) -` PM PEAK HOUR (4:30-5:30pm) — N A LOCUST GROVE RD. I 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 OVERLAND RD. I I I 530 500 v I <---- 500 670 30 > v---- 170 880 < 1020 0 ----^ I ^ 0 — 350 290 ----> I I 290 350 60 ----v I> 60 _ I 60 0 170 30 I 0 OVERLAND RD. 60 — 230 90 320 LOCUST GROVE RD. — FILE: 9981 PM Source: DEI RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 5 Baseline Conditions: System Capacity In order to assess the marginal impacts of the new development, the existing system capacity under baseline traffic conditions was first evaluated. The level of service at the arterial intersections was calculated for baseline conditions in the year 2005. The findings are presented in the following table. This analysis was prepared using the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual and HCS Software. A detailed analysis is presented in Appendix A for review. Table 3 Level of Service Calculation Arterial Intersections Approach Overland Road/Meridian Road Locust Grove/Overland Road (Signalized) (Unsignalized) Northbound C F/B Southbound C E/D Eastbound B B Westbound D B Overall Intersection D A Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY _ 6 Baseline conditions at the Overland/Meridian intersection were obtained from the traffic study of the Queenland Acres comprehensive plan amendment and assumed an improved signalized intersection with dual left lanes on all approaches by 2005. Shown in Table 4 are the existing levels of service for the adjacent arterial links on Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. System capacity was calculated without traffic from the proposed development. It is anticipated that Overland Road will be constructed to a five lane section by 2005. Table 4 Level of Service Calculation Arterial Roadways Peak Hr. No. of Volume Lanes Capacity Vol/Cap LOS Overland at Locust Grove 1400 5 4000 .35 A Locust Grove s/o Overland 350 2 1130 .30 A Source: APA Roadway Capacity Guidelines (2/97) Assumed in this analysis was an LOS "C" capacity (v/c=.75) of 850 vph for a two lane suburban collector and 3000 vph for a five lane minor arterial. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 7 Trip Generation The following trip rates for the proposed uses are recommended in the ITE Trip Generation Manual , (6th Edition) for the proposed land uses: The future site -generated traffic at full buildout of the subdivision was estimated using the trip generation rates in Table 5. The projected traffic volumes are presented in Table 6. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. Table 5 Trip Generation Rates (per 1000 sf) Shoppinq Day Trip Occurance Office Center Apartments Ice Rink Care Weekday End Trips 12.6 59.7 5.86 22.88 40.0 �- AM Peak Hour 1.78 1.37 0.44 1.32 7.0 Enter (82%) (61%) (17%) (66%) (53%) Exit (12%) (39%) (83%) (34%) (47%) PM Peak Hour 1.75 5.53 0.54 1.75 7.7 Enter (17%) (48%) (67%) (34%) (47%) Exit (83%) (52%) (33%) (66%) (53%) Note: ITE LU 495 (Recreational Community Center) was used to estimate traffic from the Ice Rink. ITE LU 820 (Shopping Center) was sued to estimate traffic from the retail buildings. The future site -generated traffic at full buildout of the subdivision was estimated using the trip generation rates in Table 5. The projected traffic volumes are presented in Table 6. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 8 It was assumed that 30% of the retail traffic would be pass -by trips now existing on the adjacent arterials, and 20% of the office and day care traffic would be captured within the complex. It was further assumed that the proposed high school south of the site would contribute 3000 vpd and 250 peak hour trips. Access to the school will be via Drive B. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. Table 6 Site Generated Traffic (Rounded) Land Use: Bldg. Area New Trips/Day AM PH Trios PM PH Trios Office 125 KSF 1,575 225 220 Retail 145 KSF 8,655 200 800 ® Apartments 200 DU 1,170 90 110 Ice Rink 57 KSF 335 75 100 Day Care Center 19 KSF 760 135 145 Total Driveway Volume 12,495 725 1375 Less Pass -By ( 2,600) (60) (240) Less Capture 465 _(60) 75) New Traffic 9,430 595 1060 It was assumed that 30% of the retail traffic would be pass -by trips now existing on the adjacent arterials, and 20% of the office and day care traffic would be captured within the complex. It was further assumed that the proposed high school south of the site would contribute 3000 vpd and 250 peak hour trips. Access to the school will be via Drive B. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 9 Shown in Table 7 is the projected traffic volume currently found in the COMPASS transportation model for the system roadways. Table 7 Regional Traffic Growth (Rounded) 2005 Eagle Road 22,000 Meridian Road 33,000 Overland Road e/o Locust Grove 14,000 Locust Grove Road s/o Overland 3,500 Locust Grove Road n/o Overland n/a Source: COMPASS 1/00 2020 26,000 38,000 18,000 8,700 10,000 The traffic volumes evaluated in this study are higher than the COMPASS projections with the inclusion of the site generated trips. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 10 Trip Distribution Directional counts and turning movement volumes measured at the Overland/Locust Grove Road intersection were used to develop the trip distribution factors, which follow. The most probable peak hour trip distribution for the project entrances on Overland and Locust Grove Road are shown in Table 8. Table 8 PM Peak Hour Trip Distribution (% of Approach Volume) Outbound Trips Turninq Inbound Trips Turning Right Left Rlght Left Overland Entrance PM Peak Hour 60% 40% 40% 60% Locust Grove Entrance PM Peak Hour 70% 30% 30% 70% Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 11 Traffic Assignments Based on the trip generation and distribution assumptions previously presented, future trips resulting from full buildout of the Resolution Subdivision were estimated and assigned to the internal streets and project entrances. Projected average daily traffic volumes for year 2005 site traffic conditions are illustrated in Figure 3. Shown in Figure 4 are the year 2005 peak hour turning movements at the project driveways. These volumes include the future traffic from the full buildout of the Resolution Subdivision and proposed high school plus the background traffic for the year 2005 projected by COMPASS for the adjacent arterials. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. FIGURE 3 LOCUST GROVE ROAD _, RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION © OO AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC �..-_v.... YR. 2005 I�LT/NL r p v CLL------------ _ p 0 a 0 D'" _ 0_ RETAIL 0 E �► E anvr..nc F, E Z r � i �-� z 1 =__, o i i t o err= 1 i i 1� ♦3000 �► ®® o 0- (1:0 0am Comm Coal Ut 11 25 �40P o o B aFFlCE 4 ADT -I- AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC Traffic Study Prepared By: DOME ENGINEERING, INC. m Hmwlmd . Or. 0.6% 0 oM 346-3ao N Ell LOCUST GROVE ROAD -0-375 -0-395 50 70 175 -low-r 195 -01.r 115 -' 25 v 30 i 150 -t- 4j , h ha Co Dov Ln0 00 00 RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION o v' of 50 J 75.3, h� ON CA a� 0 FIGURE 4 RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION SITE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS YR. 2005 t 5 -0- 5 Ir 5 F Y M r D 2 O M 0 )I- 0 Traffic Study Prepared By: :Ct A DOME ENGINEERING, INC. m mmwvm r or. sdft 0 WM 34&-=O RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 12 CAPACITY ANALYSIS - LEVEL OF SERVICE Capacity Analysis - Arterial Intersections A capacity analysis and Level of Service calculation was prepared to evaluate the future traffic conditions at the project entrances and arterial intersection. This analysis was based on the procedures and methodologies developed in the Highway Capacity Manual (TRB Report 209). Overland Road/Locust Grove Road Intersection Projected site traffic conditions at this intersection are shown in Figure 4, and results of the level of service calculation for stop control conditions are shown in Table 9. Table 9 Stop Control Conditions Overland and Locust Grove Roads Approach Left Thru-Right Eastbound B B Westbound B B Northbound F B Southbound F F Intersection F Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 13 Service levels were also calculated for site traffic conditions with a traffic signal. Projected traffic conditions for the years 2005 and 2020 were tested. The results are summarized in Table 10. Table 10 Overland Road and Locust Grove Road Signalized Intersection Approach Year 2005 Year 2020 Eastbound C C Westbound C D Northbound C D Southbound C D Intersection C D With the additional traffic from the proposed development and projected growth in the study area through 2005, the overall level of service will remain as an "C" rating with signalized improvements to the intersection. The detailed calculations supporting these findings are contained in Appendix B. In order to accommodate year 2020 traffic volumes, additional improvements to this intersection are required. They include dual left -turn lanes on all approaches or two through lanes on all approaches. Prepared by Dobe Engineering, Inc. RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 14 Capacity Analysis: Project Driveways Presented in Table 11 are the findings of the peak hour LOS analysis at the main unsignalized project entrances with traffic projected for the year 2005. Future turning volumes are shown in Figure 4. The calculations are included in Appendix C for review. Table 11 LOS Analysis at Proiect Entrances (Unsignalized Conditions) Left Turn In_ Left Turn Out Overall PM Peak Hour From Main Road From Site Road Intersection Locust Grove Rd. Drive F A C q Overland Road Drive A B F A Drive B B F D Drive E A F q The figures in Table 11 indicate that long delays are likely for exiting left -turning traffic at the Overland driveways. However, traffic entering the site causes little interference with the arterial traffic flow on Overland Road, and service levels are within acceptable standards. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 15 Capacity Analysis: Arterial Roadways The future capacity of the adjacent arterials was calculated for the year 2005 (with site traffic) and the year 2015. The findings of this analysis are presented in Table 12. Planned improvements to Overland Road will provide adequate capacity to accommodate projected traffic growth. Locust Grove Road capacity appears adequate to accommodate traffic increases through the year 2005. Beyond that time frame, additional lanes will be required to maintain acceptable service levels. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. Table 12 LOS Analysis: Arterial Roadways Peak Hr. No. of Volume Lanes Capacity Vol/Caa LOS Overland Road 2005 2100 5 4000 .52 A 2020 2500 5 4000 .62 B Locust Grove Road 2005 600 2 1130 .53 A 2020 1200 3 2000 .60 B Source: APA Roadway Capacity Guidelines (2/97) Planned improvements to Overland Road will provide adequate capacity to accommodate projected traffic growth. Locust Grove Road capacity appears adequate to accommodate traffic increases through the year 2005. Beyond that time frame, additional lanes will be required to maintain acceptable service levels. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC STUDY 16 Auxiliary Lane Evaluation at Project Entrance The need for turn lane improvements was evaluated to help determine what improvements, if any, would be required to insure safety and operating efficiency under year 2005 traffic conditions. The turn lane analysis for Locust Grove Road is shown below in Table 13. Source: ITE Traffic Manual Sec. 454 This analysis indicates that Locust Grove Road will require a center left -turn lane to accommodate turning traffic entering the site. Deceleration lanes will not be required on Locust Grove Road. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. Table 13 Turn Lanes at Project Entrances (50 mph Operating Speed) Opposing DHV Warrant Advancing DHV Warrant Entrance Volume L -Turn Met Volume R -Turn Met Drive F 225 70 Yes 6000 30 No Drive G 200 50 Yes 6000 25 No Source: ITE Traffic Manual Sec. 454 This analysis indicates that Locust Grove Road will require a center left -turn lane to accommodate turning traffic entering the site. Deceleration lanes will not be required on Locust Grove Road. Prepared by Dobie Engineering, Inc. APPENDIX APPENDIX A Ay��Ci< r - HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 - ----------------------------------- Streets: (N -S) LOCUST GROVE ROAD (E -W) OVERLAND ROAD Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ................... P. DOBIE Date of Analysis.......... 1/28/0 Other Information ......... YR 2005 BASELINE CONDITIONS Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound westboundNorthbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (t) SU/RV'S (t) CV's ( o) PCE'S ------------ 1 2 < 0 N 5 410 85 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1 2 < 0 N 225 670 5 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 ---------------- 1 1 < 0 50 5 80 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 1 1 < 0 5 5 5 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up ., Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 260 355 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1022 915 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1022 915 Prob. of Queue -Free -------------------------------------------------------- State: 0.91 0.99 Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 521 710 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 900 713 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 900 713 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.71 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1428 1470 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 159 151 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.70 0.70 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 112 106 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.95 0.94 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1426 1384 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 130 138 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.66 0.67 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.74 0.74 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.73 0.67 Movement Capacity: -------------------------------------------------------- (pcph) 95 93 Intersection Performance Summary SB L SB T SB R ` EB L WB L 6 93 41.4 Avg. 95% 6 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) 900 (veh) (sec/veh) -------- ------ NB L 58 ------ 95 ------ ------- 84.8 ------- 2.4 ----- --------- F NB T 6 112 > 35.3 NB R 92 1022 > 682 6.2 0.5 B SB L SB T SB R ` EB L WB L 6 93 41.4 0.1 E 6 106 > 27.3 6 915 > 190 20.2 0.1 D 6 713 5.1 0.0 B 0.1 261 900 5.6 1.3 B 1.4 Intersection Delay = 4.2 sec/veh APPENDIX B .. .0 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) LOCUST GROVE ROAD (E -W) OVERLAND ROAD Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ................... P. DOBIE Date of Analysis.......... 1/28/0 Other Information ......... YR 2005 SITE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ------------------------------------------ ------------------ Eastbound westbound NorthboundSouthbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCIS (o) SU/RV Is (o) CVIS (o) PCE IS ------------ 1 2 < 0 N 5 410 210 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 --------------- 1 2 < 0 N 250 1010 5 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 ---------------- 1 1 < 0 110 5 150 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 --------------- 1 1 < 0 5 5 5 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 -------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 '- Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 326 534 Potential Capacity: (pcph) P 947 743 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 947 743 Prob. of Queue -Free State: ----------------------------------- 0.82 0.99 Step 2: LT from Major Street ----------------------------------- WB EB ._ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 653 1068 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 765 458 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 765 458 Prob. of Queue -Free State: --------------------------------------------- 0.62 0.99 Step 3: TH from Minor Street --------------------------------------------- NB SB -- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1878 1986 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 87 75 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.61 0.61 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 53 46 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.89 0.87 Step 4: LT from Minor Street ------------------------------------------- NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1876 1769 _ Potential Capacity: (pcph) 67 78 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.53 0.54 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.63 0.64 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.63 0.52 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -- ---------------------------------------------------- 42 41 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 950 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach _ Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) ------ ------ ------ (veh) (sec/veh) NB L 128 42 ------- * ------- 11.8 ----- F --------- -- NB T 6 53 > 470.1 NB R 174 947 > 606 8.4 1.3 B SB L 6 41 102.3 0.3 F SB T 6 46 > 66.0 SB R 6 743 > 87 47.9 0.3 F B-- EB L 6 458 8. 0 0.0 B 0.1 WB L 289 765 7.5 1.9 B 1.5 _ Intersection Delay = 58.8 sec/veh 11�f?V,ej,K HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4c 01-28-2000 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation -------------------------------------------------- Streets: (N -S) LOCUST GROVE ROAD (E -W) OVERLAND ROAD Analyst: P. DOBIE File Name: 9960B.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-28-0 Comment: YR 2005 W/SITE TRAFFIC ------------- ----------------____________ Northbound I Southbound I Eastbound I Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes •- Volumes PHF or PK15 Lane W (ft) Grade It Heavy Veh Parking Bus Stops ` Con. Peds Ped Button Arr Type -- RTOR Vols Lost Time Prop. Share] Prop. Prot. ------------ Phase Combi n 1 2 < 250 1010 5 0.95 0.95 0.95 12.0 12.0 0 2 2 2 (Y/N) N 0 0 (Y/N) Y 11.5 3 3 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 6 7 8 1 1 < 110 5 150 0.95 0.95 0.95 12.0 12.0 0 2 2 2 (Y/N) N 0! 0 (Y/N) Y 17.5 s 3 3 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 ation 1 2 1 1 < 5 5 5 0.95 0.95 0.95 12.0 12.0 0 2 2 2 (Y/N) N 0 0 (Y/N) Y 17.5 s 3 3 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 ---------------- Signal Operatic 3 4 1 2 < 5 410 210 0.95 0.95 0.95 12.0 12.0 0 2 2 2 (Y/N) N 0 0 (Y/N) Y 11.5 s 3 3 0 3.00 3.00 3.00I --------------- >ns 5 NB Left * EB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right - Peds * Peds SB Left * WB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds EB Right NB Right WB Right SB Right -- Green 8.5A 17.5A Green 19.OA 29.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- r Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ` ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- NB L 187 1770 0.621 0.106 29.2 D 24.7 C TR 327 1592 0.498 0.206 21.5 C -- SB L 187 1770 0.027 0.106 23.3 C 20.1 C TR 354 1723 0.028 0.206 18.5 C EB L 393 1770 0.013 0.222 17.6 C 16.6 C _ TR 1179 3536 0.582 0.333 16.6 C WB L 393 1770 0.669 0.222 23.7 C 25.0 C TR 1241 3723 0.903 0.333 25.3 D Intersection Delay = 22.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.713 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1 < 5 5 5 0.95 0.95 0.95 12.0 12.0 0 2 2 2 (Y/N) N 0 0 (Y/N) Y 17.5 s 3 3 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 ---------------- Signal Operatic 3 4 1 2 < 5 410 210 0.95 0.95 0.95 12.0 12.0 0 2 2 2 (Y/N) N 0 0 (Y/N) Y 11.5 s 3 3 0 3.00 3.00 3.00I --------------- >ns 5 NB Left * EB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right - Peds * Peds SB Left * WB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds EB Right NB Right WB Right SB Right -- Green 8.5A 17.5A Green 19.OA 29.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- r Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ` ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- NB L 187 1770 0.621 0.106 29.2 D 24.7 C TR 327 1592 0.498 0.206 21.5 C -- SB L 187 1770 0.027 0.106 23.3 C 20.1 C TR 354 1723 0.028 0.206 18.5 C EB L 393 1770 0.013 0.222 17.6 C 16.6 C _ TR 1179 3536 0.582 0.333 16.6 C WB L 393 1770 0.669 0.222 23.7 C 25.0 C TR 1241 3723 0.903 0.333 25.3 D Intersection Delay = 22.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.713 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 < 5 410 210 0.95 0.95 0.95 12.0 12.0 0 2 2 2 (Y/N) N 0 0 (Y/N) Y 11.5 s 3 3 0 3.00 3.00 3.00I --------------- >ns 5 NB Left * EB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right - Peds * Peds SB Left * WB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds EB Right NB Right WB Right SB Right -- Green 8.5A 17.5A Green 19.OA 29.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- r Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ` ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- NB L 187 1770 0.621 0.106 29.2 D 24.7 C TR 327 1592 0.498 0.206 21.5 C -- SB L 187 1770 0.027 0.106 23.3 C 20.1 C TR 354 1723 0.028 0.206 18.5 C EB L 393 1770 0.013 0.222 17.6 C 16.6 C _ TR 1179 3536 0.582 0.333 16.6 C WB L 393 1770 0.669 0.222 23.7 C 25.0 C TR 1241 3723 0.903 0.333 25.3 D Intersection Delay = 22.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.713 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- A HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4c 01-28-2000 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ---------------------------------------------- Streets: (N -S) LOCUST GROVE ROAD (E -W) OVERLAND ROAD Analyst: P. DOBIE File Name: 9960B.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-28-0 Comment: YR 2020 W/SITE TRAFFIC -------------------------------------------_____________________ Northbound I Southbound I Eastbound I Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes -- Volumes PHF or PK15 Lane W (ft) - Grade Heavy Veh Parking Bus Stops Con. Peds Ped Button Arr Type -- RTOR Vols Lost Time Prop. Share Prop. Prot. ------------ Phase Combi n 2 1 < 200 100 200 0.95 0.95 0.95 12.0 12.0 0 2 2 2 (YIN) N 0 0'i (YIN) Y 20.5 sl 3 3 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 ation 1 2 2 1 < 200 200 200 0.95 0.95 0.95 12.0 12.0 0 2 2 2 (YIN) N 0 0 (YIN) Y 20.5 s 3 3 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 ---------------- Signal Operatic 3 4 -- NB Left 2 < Thru 150 Right 250 Peds 0.95 SB Left 12.0 Thru Cap Right 0 -" Peds 2 EB Right 2 WB Right N - Green 6.OA 23.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combinat: - --------------------------------------- Intersection Perforr 2 2 < < 150 500 250 0.95 0.95 0.95 12.0 12.0 Cap Right 0 Peds 2 2 2 (YIN) N Green 9.OA 36.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 0 Lon order: #1 #2 #5 #6 0 (YIN) Y 14.5 S 3 3 1676 0.707 0.267 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 ---------------- >ns 7 8 3539 5 0.078 2 2 < 300 1200 150 0.95 0.95 0.95 12.0 12.0 Cap Right 0 Peds 2 2 2 (YIN) N Green 9.OA 36.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 0 Lon order: #1 #2 #5 #6 0 (YIN) Y 14.5 3 3 1676 0.707 0.267 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 --------------- 6 7 8 EB Left Lane Thru Adj Sat Right g/C Peds WB Left Thru Cap Right Ratio Peds Delay NB Right Delay SB Right NB Green 9.OA 36.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Lon order: #1 #2 #5 #6 --------------------------------- lance Summary ----- 28.1 Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS NB ----- L ---- 275 ------- 3539 ----- 0.788 ----- 0.078 ----- 35.9 --- D ----- 28.1 --- D TR 447 1676 0.707 0.267 22.8 C - SB L 275 3539 0.788 0.078 35.9 D 37.0 D TR 459 1723 0.918 0.267 37.5 D EB L 393 3539 0.415 0.111 24.5 C 15.4 C TR 1455 3539 0.569 0.411 13.6 B "- WB L 393 3539 0.827 0.111 34.6 D 33.2 D TR 1506 3663 0.991 0.411 32.9 D Intersection Delay = 28.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D Lost ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.929 APPENDIX C .. HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) DRIVE A (E -W) OVERLAND ROAD Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ................... P. DOBIE Date of Analysis.......... 1/28/0 Other Information ......... YR 2005 SITE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection -------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound NorthboundSouthbound L T R L T R L T R L T R - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCIs (o) SU/RV Is (t) CVIS (%) PCE Is ------------ 0 2 < 0 N 625 50 .95 .95 0 --------------- 1 2 0 N 75 1325 .95 .95 0 1.10 1 0 1 50 75 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 --------------- _ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up r Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road *5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 — Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road *6.00 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC -------------------------------------------------------- Intersection'j� Step 1: RT from Minor Street -------- SB _ Conflicting Flows: (vph) ------------------------- 356 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 914 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 914 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.90 Step 2: LT from Major Street ------------------------------------------ WB EB - Conflicting Flows: (vph) 711 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 786 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 786 — Prob. of Queue -Free State: --------------------------------------------------- 0.89 Step 4: LT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- NB SB - Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2158 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 80 Major LT, Minor TH _ Impedance Factor: 0.89 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.89 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.89 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 71 -- Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% — Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ ------ (veh) (sec/veh) NB L 58 71 -------------- ----- 152.1 3.0 F --------- 63.5 NB R 87 914 4.4 0.3 A — WB L 87 786 5.1 0.3 B 0.3 _ Intersection Delay = 3.8 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1 c Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) DRIVE B (E -W) OVERLAND ROAD Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ................... P. DOBIE Date of Analysis.......... 1/28/0 Other Information ......... YR 2005 SITE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCIS (%) SU/RV's (t) CVIs (%) PCE Is ------------ 0 2 < 0 N 495 120 .95 .95 0 --------------- 1 2 0 N 180 1195 .95 .95 0 1.10 ---------------- 1 0 1 120 180 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 --------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) -------------------------------------------------------- Left Turn Major Road *5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road *6.00 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC ---------------------------------- Intersection �� 3 Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB -------------- SB -------------- Conflicting Flows: ( h) _ ------------ 324 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 949 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 949 Prob. of Queue -Free State: ---- ------------------------------ 078 Step 2: LT from Major Street WB ---------------------- EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) ------------ 647 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 843 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 843 Prob. of ---------Queue_Free-State: 0.75 ---------------------NB--------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street ------------------ ------------- SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) ------------------------- 2031 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 94 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.75 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.75 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.75 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 71 Intersection Performance Summary Flow Move Shared Rate 95% Total Queue Approach Ca Movement (pcph) (p Cap (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) Delay Length LOS (veh) Delay Move---- -- ------ (sec/veh) NB L 139 71 ------- ------- 568.0 10.5 F NB R 208 949230.1 4.9 0.9 p, WB L 208 843 5.7 1.1 B 0.7 Intersection Delay = 30.6 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c I VT Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation -- University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) DRIVE E (E-W) OVERLAND ROAD Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ................ P. DOBIE Date of Analysis.......... 1/28/0 Other Information ......... YR 2005 SITE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ----------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L- T R --- L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 2 < 0 Stop/Yield N Volumes 515 50 PHF .95 .95 Grade 0 MC's (o) SU/RV's (o) CVIs (%) PCE Is ----------------------- 1 2 0 N 75 1215 .95 .95 0 1.10 --------------- 1 0 1 50 75 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 --------------- - Adjustment Factors Vehicle Maneuver Critical Follow-up — -------------------------------------------------------- Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 -------- Right Turn Minor Road 2.10 — Through Traffic Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Left Turn Minor Road 3.30 *6'50 6.00 3.40 — HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection — . -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- NB SB - Conflicting Flows: (vph) 298 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 978 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 978 Prob. of Queue-Free State: — -------------------------------------------------------- 0.91 Step 2: LT from Major Street -------------------------------------------------------- WB EB - Conflicting Flows: (vph) 595 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 892 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 892 Prob. of Queue-Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.90 Step 4: LT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- NB SB - Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1926 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 106 Major LT, Minor TH — Impedance Factor: 0.90 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.90 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.90 -` Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 96 — Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% _ Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ ------ (veh) (sec/veh) NB L 58 96 -------------- ----- 83.1 2.3 F --------- 35.7 NB R 87 978 4.0 0.2 A WB L 87 892 4.5 0.3 A 0.3 Intersection Delay = 2.4 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c V1 Page 1 Center For For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) DRIVE F (E -W) LOCUST GROVE ROAD Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ................... P. DOBIE Date of Analysis.......... 1/28/0 Other Information ......... YR 2005 SITE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection -------- --------------------------- -------------------------------------- Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCIs (%) SU/RV's (o) CVIs (o) PCE Is ------------ 0 1 < 0 N 195 30 .95 .95 0 --------------- 1 1 0 N 70 395 .95 .95 0 1.10 --------------- 1 0 1 30 70 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 -------------- - Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up _ Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------- Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 -- Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 221 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1070 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1070 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.92 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 237 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1322 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1322 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.94 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 711 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 410 Major LT, Minor TH 81 1070 Impedance Factor: 0.2 A 0.94 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.94 Capacity Adjustment Factor 0.4 due to Impeding Movements 0.94 Movement Capacity: -------------------------------------------------------- (pcph) 385 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 950 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- WB L ------ 35 ------ 385 ------------- 10.3 ------- ----- 0.2 C --------- 5.6 WB R 81 1070 3.6 0.2 A SB L 81 1322 2.9 0.1 A 0.4 Intersection Delay = 1.0 sec/veh -.erfiified Mailing Rety Project Name C �r` t������ File No(s) C(2 Address Reason for Return MR WILI- WM' MOO WIN • I IQ . wr. 1L 0 LOT MIA 17r1�� A1TM' Iffiff __ � 1I.s9URMrid July 13, 2000 RZ 00-003 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 18, 2000 APPLICANT G.L. Voigt / Overland 16, LLC ITEM NO. REQUEST Development Agreement - rezone of 37.64 acres from R-4 to L -O zone for proposed Resolution Business Park - south of Overland Road and east of Locust Grove Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS See attached signed D/A OTHER: Contacted: %(G�;(,t 'r?� Date: �� d Phone: T(�,lec� r�C ''dam= Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. .- July 13, 2000 ORDINANCE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 18, 2000 APPLICANT G.L. Voigt / Overland 16, LLC ITEM NO. Q REQUEST Annexation and zoning of 16.119 acres from RT to C -G for proposed Resolution Business Park - south of Overland Road and east of Locust Grove Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS See attached signed D/A Contacted: , Date: Phone: r Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. December 21, 2000 Stan McHutchison Briggs Engineering, Inc. 1800 W. Overland Rd. Boise, ID 83705 Re: Resolution Subdivision No. 1 Dear Stan: RWEwED DEC 2 2 2000 CITY OF NIERMIAN 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has completed a review on the above-mentioned project. The design on the 36" Class III pipe has been re -designed based on your re -grading of the piping of the Hunter Lateral. The pipe size is acceptable because of the minimum cover over the pipeline. It appears the overflow has been changed from flowing into the Cook Lateral and will run into a waste ditch along Overland Road. A maintenance road will be required along the side of the proposed pipeline. The short distance from the end of the pipeline to Overland Road is still a concern for the District. If constructed according to the plans, this project appears to be acceptable with the exception of the open space at Overland Road. Please contact the District's attorney, Ms. Laura Burri at 342-4591 and ask that she prepare a pressure irrigation contract. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me Sincerely, owlb4_ -- Bill Henson, Asst. Water Superintendent NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT BH: din Cc: File Board of Directors Secretary -Treasurer Water Superintendent Ride 4- Gillmore Sharp & Smith, Inc. — John Sharp Ringert Clark Chartered — Laura Burri City of Meridian APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 13 14 i ** TX CONFIRMAILON REPORT ** DATE TIME TO/FROM 12/22 15:10 PUBLIC WORKS 12/22 15:10 208 888 6854 AS OF DEC 22 'to 15:11 PAGE.01 CITY OF MERIDIAN MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD# STATUS OF --S 00'13" 001 197 OK EC --S 00'23" 001 197 OK RBcE1VF4D DEC 2 2 2w December 21, 2000 Stan McHutchison Briggs Engineering, Inc. 1800 W. Overland Rd. Boise, ID 83705 Re: Resolution Subdivision No. 1 Dear Stan: 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651.4395 FAX # 208.463-0092 Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nompo 466.7861 SHOP! Nompo 466-0663 The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has completed a review on the above-mentioned project. The design on the 36" Class III pipe has been re -designed based on your re -grading of the piping of the Hunter Lateral. The pipe size is acceptable because of the minimum cover over the pipeline. It appears the overflow has been changed from flowing into the Cook Lateral and will run into a waste ditch along Overland Road. A maintenance road will be required along the side of the proposed pipeline. The short distance from the end of the pipeline to Overland Road Is still a concern for the District, If constructed according to the plans, this project appears to be acceptable with the exception of the open space at Overland Road. Please contact the District's attorney, Ms. Laura Surri at 342-4591 and ask that she prepare a pressure irrigation contract. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me Sincerely, oi&6 Bill Henson, Asst. Water Superintendent NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT BH: din Cc: File Board of Directors Secretary -Treasurer Water Superintendent Ride 4- Gillmore Sharp & Smith, Inc. — John Sharp Ringert Clark Chartered -- Laura Surri City of Meridian APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS • 23.000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - e0 000 July 13, 2000 ORDINANCE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 18, 2000 APPLICANT G.L. Voigt / Overland 16, LLC ITEM NO. ' �r REQUEST Ordinance - rezone of 37.64 acres from R-4 to L -O zone for proposed Resolution Business Park - south of Overland Road and east of Locust Grove Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS See attached Ordinance M Contacted: ' E Date: --1/ l+ Phone: -� 4..I b, ,4 `' r7 �J r Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. City of Meridian City Clerk's Office Phone: 208-888-4433 Fax: 208-888-4218 To: Steve O'Brien From: Shelby Fax: Pages: 5 Phone: Date: 06/22/00 Re: Resolution Business Park cc: Ordinance (RZ 00-003) ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle Steve, I'll need this Ordinance for the July 5th Agenda. ThanksM Shelby -1. i n to roff ice MEMORANDUM To: William G. Berg, Jr. From: Marlene St. Geo Subject: Development Agreement for RZ-00-003 Date: June 27, 2000 Will: *"r RECEIVEj) JUN 212ppp CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE Pursuant to a voice mail from Becky Bowcutt, pertaining to the Development Agreement for G.L. Voigt rezone for Resolution Park, please find attached a new original of page 4 to that agreement. Please replace this new page 4 with the one previously sent in the Development Agreement. The designation zone has been changed to reflect the L -O zone. If you have any questions please give me a call. ficn�=� /'-LCe-2uz'L' Z:\WorkVVI\Meridian 15360M\Resolution Business Park AZ RZ CUP PP\Berg062700.Mem Memo To: Shelby From: Steve O'Brien CC: Date: 06/29/00 Re: Ordinance for Resolution Business Park RECEIVE JUN 2 9 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY r.i FRK OFFICE Enclosed is a map for the above referenced ordinance. I still have the Sontag Eye Associates Ordinance Map to complete. I'll get it done by tomorrow afternoon, and send it over on Monday. From the desk of... Steve OBrien Engineering Tech. I Meridian Public Warks Departrra 200 E. Carlton St, Suite 100 Meridian, Idaho 83642 2600 (208) 887-2211 0 Page 1 Fax (208) 887-1297 JUN 22 '00 17:17 FR CITY OF MERIDIAN rem 208 884 4259 TO PUBLIC WORKS City of Meridian City Clerk's Office Phone: 208-888-4433 Fax: 208-888-4218 to: Steve O'Brien From: Shelby Fac Pages: 5 Phone: pone: 06/22/00 Re: Resolution Business Park cc: Ordinance (RZ 00-003) P. 01/07 ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ P'ease Reply ❑ Please Recycle Steve, 111 need this Ordinance for the July 5th Agenda. ThanksM Shelby JUN 22 '00 17:16 FR CITY OF MERIDIPN 206 684 4255 TO PUBLIC WORKS P.02i07 CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE FINDING THAT THE OWNER OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY HAS MADE A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR REZONE OF THE .ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR REAL PROPERTY THAT LIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN FROM R-4 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DIS TRXCT) ZONING DISTRICT TO L -O (LIMITED OFFICE DISTRICT) AS DEFINED UNDER MERIDIAN CITY CODE § 11-7-2 G, REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS ORDERS OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ADD SAID REZONING DESIGNATION TO THE OFFICIAL MAPS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. FINDINGS; 1. The otivner of the following described property has made a written request for a re -zone of the zoning classification for the subject Real Property herein described from R-4 (Low Density Residential) District to L-0 (Limited Office) District as defined under Meridian City Code § 1 ] -7-2 G; and 2. The City of Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission and City G. L. V01GT / (L-0) RZ-00-003 / RE -ZONE 01WINANCE - 1. JUN 22 '00 17:1B FR CITY OF MERIDIAN 20E B64 4259 TO PUBLIC WORKS P.03i07 n Council having given notice and conducted all public hearings in accordance with law and having issued its findings of fact and conclusions of law and Decision and Order granting the application for rezone; and 3. The real property which is the subject of this ordinance is legally described as follows: A parcel of land including a portion of Overland Road right-of- way lying in the NW 1/4 of Section 20, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the North 1/4 corner of Section 20, T. 3N., R. lE., B.M., the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; Thence S 00c24'1 6" W 849.15 feet along the east line of the NW I/4 to a point; Thence _\' 89°52'19" W 1,821.54 feet parallel with the north line of the NW 1/4 to a point on the centerline of the Hunter Lateral; Thence N 05°29'17" W 20.43 feet along said centerline to a point; Thence N 16°14'08" W 216.98 feet along said centerline to a point; Thence N 18'2739"W 470.81 feet along said centerline to a point; Thence N 07°06'04" W 175.77 feet along said centerline to a point on the centerline of Overland Road, which is also the north line of said NW 1/4; G. L. VO1GT / (L -O) RZ-00-003 / RE -ZO'N'E ORDINANCE - 2 JUN 22 '22 17:19 FR CITY OF MERIDIAN 20S 894 4259 TO PUBLIC FORKS P.04i07 Thence S 89'52'19" E 2,060.97 feet along said north line to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; Said parcel of land contains 38.018 acres more or less. 4. The following conditions shall be required as follows to -wit: 4.1 Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance. The ditches to be piped shall be shown on the site plans_ Plans shall be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. 4.2 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project shall have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 4.3 Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements. 4.4 Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 4.5 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 4.6 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct G. L. VOIGT / (L-0) RZ-00-003 / RE -ZONE ORDINANCE - 3 JUN 22 '00 17:18 FR CITY OF MERIDIAN 208 884 4259 TO PUBLIC WORKS P.05i07 illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section. 4.7 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 4.8 Provide five -foot -wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance. 4.9 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 4.10 A Development Agreement shall be required. 4.11 Applicant shall provide an internal vehicular access connection through the apartment complex to Locust Grove Road. SECTION 2. That the above-described Property be, and the same is hereby re- zoned and designed (L -O) Limited Office District. SECTION 3. That the City Engineer is hereby direct to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps depicting the City of Meridian land use zones in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 4: All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its G. L. VO1GT / (L -O) RZ-00-003 / RE -ZONE ORDINANCE - 4 JUN 22 '00 17:18 FR CITY OF MERIDIPN 208 884 4255 TO PUBLIC WORKS P.06i07 /_. /'y passage, approval and publication, according to law. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this _ day of , 2000. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this _ day of , 2000. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO,) SS. County of Ada. ) On this day of , 2000, before me, theNotary undersigned, a � ry Public in and for said State, personally appeared ROBERT D. COME and WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk of the CITY of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) NOTARY PUBLIC FOR 1DAHO RESIDING AT: MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: msg\7AW0rk\N \Meridian 15360MUteso1u60n Business Pa if A2 RZ ci-T PP\tZOrdinancc G. L. VOIGT / (L -O) RZ-00-003 / RE -ZONE ORDINANCE - 5 JUN 22 '00 17:19 FR CiT'r' OF MERIDIAN 208 B84 4259 TO PUBLIC WORKS P.07i07 CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To: The Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor of Ada Countv, and The State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk, of the City of Meridian, Ada County, State of Idaho, do hereby certify that the attached copy of Ordinance No. , passed by the City Council of the City of Meridian, on the day of 2000, is a true and correct copy of the original of said document which is in the care, custody and control of the City Clerk of the City of Meridian. WILLIAM G. BERG, JR - STATE OF IDAHO. ss. County of Ada, ) On this day of in the year 2000, before me, , a Notary Public, appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR, known or identified to me to be the City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Idaho that executed the said instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of the City of Meridian. ( SEAL) Notary Public for Idaho Commission Expires:_ msg�Z:\Wor'.;',ti1�Mcridiar, 15360:`^\ _suietion Evsiness Park A7 R7- CUP nCertitcationOf0crl<R7.0rd CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF, v1ERIDLAN - 1 RZ-00-001 ** TOTAL PPSE.07 ** June 2, 2000 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 6, 2000 APPLICANT G.L. Voigt / Overland, LLC ITEM NO. REQUEST Preliminary Plat of 17 building lots and 2 other lots on 107.06 acres for proposed Resolution Business Park - south of Overland Road and east of Locust Grove Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS See attached PZ minutes See attached memo See attached recommendations See attached�� Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. 9,C(A,�Cv ko�A� d (,O(Dv - �w -(�yy 6c -t-1 ERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING --MAY 9, 2000 The regular scheduled meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission was call to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Keith Borup. MEMBERS PRESENT: Keith Borup, Sally Norton, Kent Brown, Tom Barbeiro, Richard Hatcher. OTHERS PRESENT: David Swartley, Bruce Freckleton, Brad Hawkins Clark, Will Berg. Borup: We'd like to call to order our meeting this evening. This is a regular scheduled meeting for Planning and Zoning Commission. I'd like to go through attendance of the Commissioner's. First item on the agenda is the Consent Agenda. I would entertain a motion for approval of the Consent Agenda. Brown: Mr. Chairman I would move approval of the Consent Agenda, Items A,B and C, minutes from the March 22"d, April 3rd and April 11th meetings. Hatcher: I second the motion. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Brown: I would like to be excused for the first 7 items. Borup: Okay. Have fun. Item number 1 and 2 were tabled. I believe we tabled those items wanting to finalize Items 3 through 6. Would we like to skip to Items 3 through 6 and come back or would the Commissioner's like to open and vote on 1 and 2 right now. 3. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF 17 LOTS ON 107.06 ACRES IN PROPOSED L-0 AND C -G ZONES FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC—OVERLAND AND LOCUST GROVE ROADS: Borup: Does staff have any additional comments to make on this. It was continued for the ACHD report. We had the draft report a while back. We have the final report now. Is the applicant here and like to come forward. Do any of the Commissioner's have anything additional they'd like to ask the applicant, other than the ACHD report. Bowcutt: These items were deferred because we were awaiting Ada County Highway District Staff Report as you recall at our public hearing a month or so ago. We had not even received a draft. The staff, I think they went through about 3 versions of the draft and it did go to the highway district Commissioner's last Wednesday at their noon meeting for discussion. To bring you up to date the Commissioner's did recommend Meridian Planning an&`1,9ning Commission �. May 9, 2000 Page 2 approval of all the projects involved. They instructed their staff to get with us and the City of Meridian and the school district and see what can be done to exhilarate the upgrade of Overland Road between Locust Grove and Eagle Road. At this point of time, it is on their 2004 plan. They realize that they could have an operational high school as early as 2002. That did concern them. They have also required multiple improvements of my client, which includes constructing a 3`d lane from the east end of our property up to the intersection of Locust Grove and then south on Locust Grove to our southerly boundary. On of the comments that was made by the Commission, that type of improvement can run anywhere from $125 to $175 thousand dollars. If we go in and we construct that 3rd lane and then they come in 6, 12, 18 months later and tear it all out to build their five lane, it makes more sense that we exhilarate the 5 lane and put those monies to use building or helping to construct the 5 lane. Therefore, it would save some public funds. The things that I want to bring to your attention that they placed upon this project, they have asked us to contribute 25% of a signal at the intersection of Locust Grove and Overland. The intersection operates at a level of service A at this time, however, the left hand turn lane operates at a level of service F. According to ACHD's traffic counts the counts at this time do not warrant signalization. In the future they realize they will need a signal there. They understand that the retail that we propose at that corner is down the road is not one of the first 3 or 4 phases that is going to be further down the road then that. Probably co-insiding with some type of a Locust Grove overpass. They accept the fact that a light is necessary, but state they will construct that light when it is warranted. Secondly, they have asked us to contribute $112,500 which would be 75% of the light at our new Millenium Way Overland intersection which is the collector roadway for the high school. That 75% does include the high school or the school district share. My conversations with the school district, they have indicated that they will pay whatever proportionate share the highway district deems is attributed to their traffic volume. There is approximately 5000 trips a day through Millenium Way. Of those 5,000, 3,000 will be from going to and from the high school site. They've asked us to contribute $52,800 dollars to a trust fund for sidewalk along Overland Road. We asked them to allow us to construct the sidewalk versus trust funding for it. The policy of the City of Meridian is they would like to see those sidewalks go in as soon as possible. Their concern was if we placed the sidewalk in at the edge of the new right of way that it could be torn out when the road is rebuilt. Our suggestion was we'll take the sidewalk and meander within our 30 foot landscaped area. Therefore, we will be outside the right of way and would not require any modification. The Commission seemed to believe that's a viable option. They asked staff to get with us and discuss it. We will be building decel lanes at the intersection. They ok'ed all of our approaches on Overland Road. They asked us to upgrade our collector. We shoed a 41 foot collector roadway section for Millenium Way. They indicated they'd like that to be 46 foot section. My client agreed to that. They asked us to provide adequate stacking room for any of the approaches as they intercept with Millenium Way. The only major revision was on Locust Grove. We have this approach right here. They have asked us to move this to offset it from this roadway here to Meridian Planning and—_'nning Commission .� May 9, 2000 Page 3 increase that distance of offset. We will shift this building this direction and then shift this to the south and then put parking in there. Our offsets from all of the major intersections for the signal will be installed in the future are acceptable. This was the only thing of significance. This is a multi phased project and the highway district commission liked this—the idea of a long term project. The first phase will be the ice hockey facility. The second phase would consist of 140 units of the total 200 apartments, 2001. The seminary will go in whatever time the high school goes in. All of this is down the road. Your staff placed a limitation on the conditional use permit for the apartments -40 units in the first phase. I brought that up with Ada County Highway District and they said that doesn't make any sense. That is one of the lowest traffic generators on the site. Also, you can't afford to pay all of these trust funds and make all the improvements if you can't begin the projects. 40 units is not acceptable. My clients indicate they can not function with 40 units. Ada County Highway District did look at impact fees generated by this project. The school district is exempt from impact fees but all of the uses on the property would be subject. The multi family project would pay $160,000 in impact fees. The retail space would generate over one million dollars. That brings you up to date. Barbeiro: Becky is Millenium Drive to be placed as part of the first phase. Bowcutt: Yes sir. The first phase we are constructing all of the public roadway systems. We'll built Millenium Way and put all the sewer, water, 3 phase power and then build this public street here, the rotary and this public street here. We have all ready designed all of those roadways. Barbeiro: Can you remind me of what kind of meetings you've had with the school district in regards to Millenium Drive, the students that will use that and the roadway being the primary road for all of the construction at the high school. Bowcutt: They will be coming up and down that roadway. It will have to be there before they can pull their permit. The highway district has indicated they want to focus all of the high school traffic where that signal is going to be constructed. Barbeiro: As I recall, the conditional use permit for the high school won't be available until the signal is operational. Bowcutt: According to your planning staff the high school does not require a conditional use permit in their R-4 zone. They will just be submitting for building permit. That is why the highway district imposed the 75% of that light—the $112,000 because they would not see that school application come through. All of my users will be conditional use applications. That was the other thing that they liked. Norton: According to the Ada County Highway District we received the draft report and then the final report sometime today. The difference between the two is that instead of Meridian Planning and,':Zoning Commission .. May 9, 2000 Page 4 paying the $52,000 for the sidewalk on Overland, you will put in the sidewalk in your landscape area. Is that correct? Bowcutt: That's what we requested. Norton: You started to talk about not doing the center lane improvement on Overland in order for Overland to be widened to 5 lanes earlier. Would you go through what you said on that. Bowcutt: In the staff report approved by the Commission it mandates that we construct a 3rd center turn lane for the entire length of our property. It would be from our perimeter to the intersection and then down to our southern boundary here. Three lane on Overland and Locust Grove. Norton: How close is your far east property to Eagle Road? Bowcutt: This is one half mile. In our staff report we are required to construct that. The issue we brought up with the commission is we would like to see the improvements accelerated. We don't want to see the third lane wasted. The elevations will all change. Norton: Did you get any idea how far up the priority list it was going to be moved? Bowcutt: The staff and I had at least four discussions. They indicated that their superiors would not make a decision. We would have to take our plea to the commission and that is what we did. They instructed their staff, you need to figure out a solution and now. With that school coming in 2002, 1 would anticipate them trying to accelerate it two years—If I had to guess. Norton: Are you under the understanding that that road will be five lanes by the time school goes in 2002. Bowcutt: That is what I hope and I think the commission wants their staff to figure out how to do that. Borup: At this point, something could be worked out that's the way to go. If it can't be worked out then the 3 lanes are going in. Bowcutt: We will end up building the third lane. Those requirements are set down. I did forget to mention, they are going to add additional turn lanes at the Eagle Road Overland intersection and that work should begin in a few months and they indicated they are going to get started on the Meridian Road Overland intersection for that improvement. Borup: Before we proceed I'd like a show of hands how many people are here to testify on this application. We have received public testimony over the last three months so Meridian Planning ancl^oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 5 what we'd be open for is anything pertaining to the ACHD report we will be glad to take any testimony on. Bertell: Steve Bertell. I live at 2535 S. Velvet Falls Way. Mr. chairman and members of the commission, at this time I would like to present to the board a total of 725 signatures from residents from all the impacted Subdivisions, all respectfully asking the commission to at least delay the approval of this development until such a time as Overland and Locust Grove Roads are widened. Those who have signed the petitions are frustrated over having to drive in all ready heavily trafficked roadway on a daily basis. We agree with the ACHD impact analysis statement that the findings of the development would only intensify the all ready major traffic problems in this area. In fact, I parked at the intersection of Overland and Locust Grove the afternoon of March 23`d from 3 PM until 6 PM and I counted 3137 vehicles using that intersection, either crossing or turning from one street to another. This coincides with the ACHD report findings of approximately 11,422 vehicles using Overland Road on a daily basis. This is existing traffic. Also, during that 3 hour period, I witnessed one rear ender accident, one near accident and my wife and I came upon another accident on Overland Road on April 10th at 5:50 PM. The traffic on these roads will easily double if not triple as a result of this development. The Ada County Highway District has no plans to widen Overland until 2004 since it is in their 5 year plan. No plans to widen Locust Grove south of Overland until sometime outside the 2005 year plan. No plans to install a traffic light there until it is warranted. I don't know what the definition of warranted is. The developer stated they wanted to start the major ice hockey and sports arena this year pending bond approval. The high school could open as early as fall 2002. Don't misunderstand us. We are not opposed to this development, but what we are saying is that we are requesting that Overland and Locust Grove be widened to accommodate the dramatic traffic increase that this proposal would create. If there is a traffic mishap on the freeway, Overland Road immediately backs up. If emergency vehicle needed to get to one of our Subdivisions, it would be difficult at best for that vehicle to get through. Let's not make Overland and Locust Grove roads another fiasco like the Curtis Road extension was. At least consider the opinions of the 725 residents as well as all of us who live in the 6 impacted Subdivisions. Borup: You feel that the road would be improved on a faster time frame without the million dollars that this project would contribute toward the roads. Bertell: I am a lay man and don't know where the money would come from. We are concerned about— Borup: We are lay men too (Inaudible) and it is not going to come from anywhere other than this type of thing. So, the fastest way to get Overland approved, is to get the money. Since this has been carrying on for several months, we had quite a number of staff recommendations on this project. Do we need a refresher on that. We know staffs recommendation is. I am thinking I mean the applicant either agrees with them or —she mentioned one in her report, so I think I'd like to get Becky back up. You had Meridian Planning ano-Zoning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 6 mentioned one item as far as staff recommendation on number of apartment units. We've got your response to all of staff comments. That was the only one that stuck out. Were there any others? That was under the CUP, Item number 2 on your response. Bowcutt: The annexation and zoning application, we were in agreement. preliminary plat, I highlighted item 8. The applicant intends to provide landscape easements along Locust Grove and Overland Roads. An association will be formed to govern perimeter landscaping. We ask that that be an easement. I believe that staff had a discussion about it being a separate lot. Borup: Staff's concern was who will maintain it. Bowcutt: At a minimum the landscape buffer shall be placed within a permanent landscape easement designated such on the plat. We would like that to be designated as an easement on the plat and provide an association for maintenance. Item 8, preliminary plat requirements. Item 10, we agreed to pipe the Hunter Lateral as requested by staff. We ask that we be allowed to provide a western fence along the western side of the apartments. Staff made a statement they prefer that it be unfenced if we pipe the lateral. Clarification on Item 13. We have a little access road. It was not intended to be a private drive. It is an access way providing joint access to those buildings. We just want to clarify that our intention was not to construct curb gutter or sidewalk there because it is an alley access. Under the PUD, I highlighted Item 4. We did not provide any RV storage, parking areas for the multi family. Those uses will be prohibited. Only personal cars will be allowed. We do not propose a maintenance building at this site. All maintenance will be contracted out with a maintenance company. We disagreed on Item 7 concerning the parking requirements. Staff asked for 2.3 spaces per dwelling unit. The ordinance mandates 2. 1 know of no multi family application where staff imposed 2.3. 1 went to another complex that has garages called the Renascence next to Chinden and Eagle Road. We did that civil engineering for that site. That one has garages and I noticed that people who have two cars but have a single garage, their spouse parked in front of the garage. I think what staffs intention for additional parking was for guests or something like that. Our contention is, it is not necessary with our type of design we have more than what we would ever need in parking. For the Ice Rink, I think there was a difference of eight spaces. Mr. McKeegan got up to discuss that stating that we have substantial amount of overflow parking to the north and there will be very few events where you would find that all parking spaces would be completely utilized. His contention was that adequate parking was provided. Obviously we were opposed to the limitation—it was the limitation of 30 units in the first phase of the apartments. We had asked for the first phase to consist of 140. For the record and for those people in the audience that were not here at the last hearing, we are asking for conceptual approval of this planned unit development, but we are only asking for site specific approval for the ice arena and the 200 unit apartments. All the other users with the exception of the high school will have to come back before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. All surrounding properties within 300 feet will be notified. Legal notice will be put in the paper. Each user will have Meridian Planning and---z<)ning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 7 to come back before this body and go through this process again. That is one factor that should be taken into consideration as far as what improvements are done out on these roadway systems when the timing of these lights and so forth. If a user comes in say a year and a half from now, and he will generate a substantial amount of traffic, at that point of time if those improvements aren't out there to support that development, I would anticipate commission having a difficult time of proving it. We've got to start somewhere and we've got to get that collector roadway and this other network of roadways and utilities to provide access to the high school. The only way we can afford to do it is to take these first couple phases and move forward. Borup: Thank you. Any questions from the commission? Barbeiro: We can ask staff questions as a whole or individually. The one that catches my eye right now is the storage areas because that is a city ordinance. Other then that, if you wanted to go down the line with some of the things that Becky disagreed with. Hawkins Clark: Commissioner Barbeiro, members of the Commission the ordinance requirement for storage areas has typically been something that if the developer makes a commitment we have waived at this level. It is not necessarily required a variance. It really particularly when garages are provided. It is something we look favorable at. Borup: At this particular site there is a proposed mini storage unit down the street. Barbeiro: How about the maintenance building. Hawkins Clark: I think when the covenants, correct me Becky if they are not, but typically we —they are going to contract out. That is not ordinance required. I think it is a recommendation. We are fine with that. On the parking issue mainly we were pointing out that the fact that on Valeri Heights no tandem parking was allowed. If your going to allow it here, we just mainly wanted to raise the attention. We certainly aren't looking for more asphalt. I think we concur with the 460 number for required parking. The cross access issue was important. Obviously we'd ask for a revised preliminary plat that shows that, that shows the new Locust Grove Driveways to be submitted for the City Council—prior to the City Council so we can review the revised preliminary plat that reflects these changes. Barbeiro: Becky, in our last meeting, you did tell us that you were going to have a cross access over the Hunter Lateral, is that correct. Bowcutt: Yes, I think our sketched out we were going to make an inter connection between those two buildings and just north of the daycare facility into that little rotary. We make on making that revision and getting that to staff prior to the City Council. Meridian Planning and-4oning Commission May 9, 2000 .-. Page 8 Barbeiro: Brad the recommendation regarding landscape buffers. 25 versus 30 and staff would prefer to have a separate lot where the developer would prefer to have an easement. Comment on that please. Hawkins Clark: This issue comes up frequently. It is mainly our concern is the consistency of appearance for principle arterials like what Overland is going to be. I think in this case with the easement going to be maintained the full buffer distance by a single entity, that's fine. Our main issue is when you have single, multiple single lots that all have a easement, each of them can take care of that landscape however they want. Barbeiro: Becky, the property will remain under one ownership, is that correct. Bowcutt: No sir. When you plat it then it would be eligible to sell off the lots to separate owners. What we propose to do is place landscape easements on the plat and then we will have to have covenants, obviously governing the uses on these lots and so forth. On these covenants it would stipulate like lot owner dues. They would not be homeowners association dues, but lot owner dues which would provide for the maintenance of all of the landscaping. It is all maintained the same. We are going to provide a landscape plan so all of it would be the same. You would not end up with a hodge podge. That is not our intention. Barbeiro: Your new plan will account for 7 handicapped spots at the arena. Bowcutt: Yes sir. Mr. McKeegan when on the record last time that they would add those. Barbeiro: Brad, when we talked about the 30 dwelling units for the apartments, Becky's note was that ACHD thought that the apartments would be one of the lower traffic count generators. Can you comment on that. Hawkins Clark: It was a bad day. Staff has re -thought that. Those are national transportation engineer figures that seem to have been accounted for. This is the only - there are only two projects that are coming in right now and certainly when you look at traffic generation you can't really take into account projects that aren't before this commission. Your really only have two projects that are before you and to put some controls on—your certainly not going to put a control on the ice arena. They are going to have events and that will draw—I think the apartment complexes—we did talk about if they are doing the 140 previously they had outlined a phase one which was more or less the northwest portion of their site B there and it didn't provide for any vehicular access out of that phase one out onto Millenium Way. Every one of those 140 was funneling out through the driveway onto Overland at the west end and not Millenium Way which is the collector. I think we would point out that we would like to see some kind of vehicular access in phase one over to Millenium Way. Meridian Planning anp`oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 9 Bowcutt: I think the applicant indicated at the last hearing he would be willing to revise what they had proposed as their first 140 units because you felt or this commission felt it was critical that they intersect with Millenium Way. So their will be an access. We will go on the record with the first phase will intersect with Millenium Way by that vehicular connection. Barbeiro: The final point was, the gates we discussed in the last one to prevent cross tracking through the residential from the high school over to Locust Grove, the developer suggested putting gates in. Is that something that will be a final item for you or is it still up in the air. Bowcutt: I think they are still under the opinion that they would prefer some type of gates. Borup: This was a gate at which point? Barbeiro: There was to be a gate over the Hunter Lateral crossing to prevent the kids from crossing through the apartments and the developer also considered putting a gate into the entrance off of Overland and just past the entrance off of Millenium Way. I believe there were three gates. Is that correct. Bowcutt: Yes, that was my understanding. We would have to have approval from your fire department to install those. The location would also have to be approved by Ada County Highway District because they want to make sure you have adequate stacking room. Borup: Has that been discussed with ACHD staff? Bowcutt: It was brought up briefly and their comment was we have to have adequate stacking room. They allow you to do it within a private roadway network as long as you have it 50 or 75 feet into the property. Maybe its 100, 1 can't remember. The last one I had was a mini storage. They don't want 3 or 4 cars turning into the site and then waiting for the gate and sticking out into the roadway. I would recommend that the commission put their subject to Ada County Highway District and fire department approval. Borup: The only other comment I think staff was on the fence —1 don't think the staff comments addressed that either way, or did they. (Inaudible)privacy fence (inaudible). There is no concern there is there. Hawkins Clark: No. Norton: I have a question for staff. At our last public hearing I had a question about gates, but has been addressed. My notes say signage of gates would be worked out with staff. Has signage been addressed. Meridian Planning an&nning Commission �..� May 9, 2000 Page 10 Hawkins Clark: Signage of the gates –of the project. They did have a written response on signage from I believe Idaho Electric Signs and then McKeegan responded for signage on the ice arena in writing. That should be in the packets. Bowcutt: I think we did have a discussion because they had some types of lights on the side of building. Norton: That was addressed on the ice arena, but for the apartment complex— Bowcutt: I did provide some specifications on signage. I believe it was a monument type sign. END OF SIDE ONE Bowcutt: I'll have to check my packet. I believe it was a monument sign. That is what staff has proposed. Borup: I think we'd be comfortable that it wouldn't be anything difference than a monument sign. Anything else. You checking or are you done Becky. Oh. Any final comments from staff. Hawkins Clark: Commissioner I think the main concern—I don't know that there is an emergency vehicular access issue has been resolved to our satisfaction. With the school site—schools are allowed in the R-4 without any public hearings. They can just come in when they get this approved and not have any public hearings on the school site and really this is the opportunity to deal with the school site even though the majority of this— Borup: You taking about a secondary access. Hawkins Clark: Yes. What did they say potentially 1800 students or something. We certainly understand and want to support the protecting these neighborhoods from cross through traffic from the school, but there is a stub street here on the west boundary of the site and then there is a stub street here immediately next to the future park site, which would be here. Whether or not those are extended into the site or how that would work, I guess our main issue or concern is that it be dealt with and maybe it can be dealt with at Council level, but somehow there'd be another access into this 55 acre school site other than just Millenium Way, particularly for emergency vehicles. Borup: Have you discussed it to what point. Would the emergency break away ballards or something like that. Hawkins Clark: Right. I don't believe the fire department has really specifically addressed it. Meridian Planning an#--,Koning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 11 Barbeiro: Brad, we have two opportunities to add emergency access. Is this where the seminary is going? Hawkins Clark: No. Here, right. Barbeiro: With the new LDS church, is there any opportunity to have a emergency access straight through their property or off of this road here as that roads appears to abut the property of the high school. Hawkins Clark: Commissioner, the LDS church is being built. It is designed. The site is under construction. I don't think there is any opportunity there. Borup: Sounds like here and here are the two stub streets. I don't think the intention is to have a traffic flow through there. Break away emergency ballard would let the fire trucks through and isn't that staffs concern. Do we know where this building maybe sited. Bowcutt: I can answer that question. The only information we received from the school district is that the school would most likely sit back in this location here up against this Hunter Lateral. Obviously the parking lots and field would be back here. There is two existing public streets right here coming into Raven Hills and another one here in Los Alamitos. It is the highway districts intention that those not be connected to the site vehicularly for like student use but be connected for pedestrian bicycle and possibly emergency access. I would assume something like ballards or maybe what they propose there. It depends on the site configuration. I stopped at Mr. Carberry's office today to see if I could obtain a copy of their draft site plan. He indicated that he does not have a copy of it. You got one. He said I don't have one, in fact I think they are still working on it. Your going to have to talk to Skyler at Hummel Architects. I said it would be nice Jim if I could see it to make sure your needs are met as far as secondary emergency access. Until we see where those circulation patterns of the school are located, we don't know what to do. Borup: Maybe at this point we just need to put some requirements in there and let them design around it. Bowcutt: Our agreement with the school district states that we... the seller acknowledges that the above described street, which is our Millenium Way, shall be the sole access route to the school which buyer intends to construct on the premises other than the emergency access here and after set forth. So, (inaudible) if we it we'd want an emergency access through you. Borup: So hereinafter set forth they are not specified. Meridian Planning ani"-)ning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 12 Bowcutt: Yeah, it was emergency vehicle access if required. In order to meet uniform fire code. (Inaudible) got a lot of parking lot along here, if they need it and if that is a adequate location, then it makes sense that we do have a secondary emergency access. It would all depend on their site plan and their needs. Borup: What are saying would be secondary. Bowcutt: If you look at— Borup: Okay, the access is still from Millenium right? Bowcutt: Yes sir. Borup: So from Millenium Drive is blocked there is no secondary access. Bowcutt: This is their primary vehicular access. There is landscaping and parking areas— Borup: Okay, your saying they could come down here through the parking lot into the site. Bowcutt: Exactly. So if the school says based on our configuration we need some emergency vehicle access here or here or even link into this drive that wraps around here. That would be an option. If its needed. I have not seen the site plan. Have you seen it. You got a copy of it. Barbeiro: It was the first draft which was two months ago. Bowcutt: Oh. He said they are still working on it. I am going to try to obtain a copy hopefully before we go to the council because I'd like them to see that and I think it would be beneficial if we know what it looks like. Borup: Sounds like the mood of the City and probably the Commissioner's is that there needs to be some type of emergency secondary access. Not a vehicle access but just emergency. Barbeiro: So when building our recommendation we would include additional emergency access through this site to be determined later. Or more specific. Borup: I don't know that we need to be more specific as long as there is another access. Hatcher: One thing to take into consideration when we are discussing emergency access of the future high school site is as Becky has pointed out, if we were to bring in a second emergency access in the approximate location of the ice hockey arena or Meridian Planning ano'',oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 13 possibly at the apartments, first of all the apartments are a congested meandering parking lot. There is no primary means of traffic, just a private roadway system. I don't think that is a valid option. Second, bringing a secondary emergency access in and around the ice skating rink I don't think is a valid option either for the sample fact that if you have a event occurring your going to have high traffic volume there. Playing devil's advocate we have an event at the school that requires emergency vehicles and we have the ice rink letting out. Millenium and all those roads are going to be plugged. When considering an emergency access to the high school, I think we should look at the options of doing emergency break away ballards down at Raven the Subdivision down below with the public road. Borup: What is the purpose of the secondary emergency access. Hatcher: If the fire truck can't get to — Borup: And that would be because of heavy traffic or because of some accident blocking the entire roadway. I assume it would be something blocking the entire roadway and then they would need another access. Hatcher: That is correct and that is why I am saying if we (inaudible) by the ice rink, they are too close together. Borup: Your saying something would be blocking both roads. Hatcher: I am saying if an event at the ice rink was to let out— Borup: That's just heavy traffic. That's not necessarily blocking — Hatcher: Hey, we've all been there. We know what it can really be like. One all ready looks like it is all ready a culdesac if I'm not mistaken. One of the two southern ones— we put the condition on the school district now and let them design accordingly and be done with it. Barbeiro: Couldn't we have a primary and a secondary. Hatcher: You would. Millenium would be your primary. We are talking about the secondary right now. I don't think this site is big enough to need three accesses. Borup: Okay, one of you guys had a motion earlier. Hatcher: I was trying to make a motion to close the public hearing. Norton: I second the motion. Borup: All in favor. Meridian Planning an�oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 14 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Barbeiro: Which hearing did we just close. Borup: Technically we closed— Hatcher: Can we close all of them, one through six. Borup: Technically we closed 3, cause that is the only one we opened. I think all the testimony we received was on all the applications, so — Hatcher: Mr. Chairman, I motion that we close the public hearing for Item 4,5,and 6. Borup: Let me open it. Open public hearing for Item number 4. Hatcher: I motion that we close it. Norton: I second it. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: I'd like to open Item number 5. Hatcher: I motion that we close it. Norton: I second it. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: I'd like to open Item number 6. Hatcher: I motion that we close that. Norton: I second that. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: Would you like to handle Items 1 and 2 and then go on to the others. Meridian Planning an--roning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 15 Barbeiro: Can we do both of them at the same time. Borup: They are both two separate items, but get those two out of the way and then get into the other—or those two have all ready been closed, so— Barbeiro: If there is no discussion, I have a motion. I motion that we recommend to City Council request for annexation and zoning of 16.119 acres from RT to CG for proposed Resolution Business Park by G.L. Voigt Development to include staff comments. Hatcher: I second the motion. Borup: Any discussion. Norton: I have discussion. I believe we discussed the CG change to CN change. I'd like to make a friendly amendment to that motion that the CG be amended. Barbeiro: Thank you Commissioner Norton, you are correct and I wish to amend that to be a CN. Borup: Any other discussion. All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: Item number 2. Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman, I wish to recommend approval to City Council request for rezone of 37.64 acres from R-4 to L -O for proposed Resolution Business Park by G.L. Voigt Development with staff comments. Hatcher: Second the motion. Borup: Any discussion. All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: We have four more items. Again, comments have been concerning all of them. We have two items on the preliminary plat. No one item, sorry. Barbeiro: The discussion between myself and Commissioner Hatcher has to do with— we would like—here's what we're differing. I would like to see a development agreement between ACHD and the developer prior to any certificate of occupancy of any building. Meridian Planning ary''Woning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 16 Hatcher: What I was trying to go for on a condition of approval from this board or recommended condition of approval to City Council would be that no certificate of occupancy would be issued to any of the proposed developments of this project until Overland Road improvements have been instructed. If that means the ice rink waits until 2002 or 2003, so be it. Barbeiro: You want a 5 lane road before anything opened. That is going to put a crimp in the developer, but I think if we had a development agreement with ACHD and the developer to have 5 lanes prior to fall 2002 when the high school opened, seeing how the development would be phased, I believe that would be correct and proper with this development. I would hate to see the development held back because the 5 lanes wasn't open for then as a condition they have to ensure that it is at least 3 lanes. If they are going to go out and do 3 lanes then ACHD is going to come in tear it out. That seems like a tremendous waste of public funds. Hatcher: Absolutely. If it boils down to working things out with ACRD. Borup: Oh it does and I agree with what your saying there, but your putting a requirement on the developer that they got no control over. Barbeiro: If we have a development agreement, that is something the developer and ACHD— Borup: ACHD don't do development agreements specifically do they. Just a written agreement. Hatcher: Putting money into a slush fund for future improvement on this project is not acceptable in my opinion. That is exactly what ACHD will do. I have no opposition of the project. In fact it is a wonderful project. Overland Road can not handle any capacity that this project would generate without the required improvements. Barbeiro: So ACHD does not do development agreements so this— Borup: I don't know if that is the terminology they use. I am not sure either way. I just have not heard that used before. Hatcher: Bruce can you comment on how ACHD typically has been dealing with those issues. Freckleton: Commissioner Hatcher and members of the commission Becky was just indicating that she is aware of one that they have done with Touchmark. I know they do non -development agreements when you have a plat and your doing it in phases if you want to record the entire plat without bonding or building the other phase. That is something we would have to address with them. Meridian Planning and,,oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 17 Barbeiro: What would staff's recommendations be to insure that somehow we have an agreement amongst all the parties that this is going to be 5 lanes prior to a large portion of occupancy. I do not want to put a high school there without a five lane road. Hatcher: I personally don't want to stop the project. I don't want to stop construction of any of the projects on the site, but I don't want to see any of them operable until the road is done. Freckleton: My personal opinion would be unless we've got it nailed down when these things are going to happen, I would not even issue the building permit. Your looking at a can of worms if you issue a building permit and hold up occupancy without some dates being set. Hatcher: Okay so the building permit will not be issued until some sort of agreement is been reached without Ada County so that their construction schedule coincides with the projects construction schedule as deemed by the time line we are discussing. Basically what that does—I would say put one hand behind the developers back. Now we are putting both hands behind with the building permit because there is a lot of negotiations that have to go on between the developer and ACHD to meet these requirements. Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman would it be of any assistance to re -open the public hearing and get some comments from the developer on this. Hatcher: I don't think it is going to help. Borup: Have you got your thoughts together on what it is that you maybe recommending. Barbeiro: Well, now that I know there really is no such thing as a development with ACHD and my other concerns are that with the new high school, this would also stop any issuance of a building permit for a new high school to be built which would cause great problems with the school bond election coming up because of the state law requiring the school to allocate the funds for and spend the funds any certain time frame. If they can not get a building permit that may cause problems with the school bonding. Hatcher: Keep in mind as well as it was brought up by staff, school district does not need public hearing. As soon as phase one is done and Millenium Drive is built, that high school can go up. We have no control over that, so any conditions as of brought of that includes traffic, any conditions we want to impose on that high school have to be done during phase one. You could have 5000 high school kids going to high school on a 2 or 3 lane road. Borup: Do any Commissioner's remember what the going to the 3 lanes what that did to the service and what the road could handle. I am not finding that. Do you remember Meridian Planning anq�Zoning Commission May 9, 2000 ^ Page 18 that Brad at all. What capacity was that going to add. Where I was going or at least the ACHD report is saying that the present configuration on Overland can handle a little less than 3000 additional vehicles. In the same paragraph they are saying that it would add 6. They are over 3000 short without —that's with the current road. I am not sure what the 3 lane would add to that capacity. I don't think it adds a lot of vehicle capacity. it will alleviate congestion. Hatcher: The third lane is a turning lane so it's going to allow people to stack up so that they won't be able to turn left because of on coming traffic. Borup: ACHD's statement is that a traffic signal is not warranted yet because traffic volumes are low enough. Barbeiro: That's Locust Grove and Overland, not Millenium. Borup: No, the side driveway is on Overland. I don't think they are taking the school into consideration on any of these figures. That adds a whole different aspect of it. Barbeiro: I need your assistance on this so we don't shut down the developer, we don't shut down the high school but we insure that there is a five lane road. Something that we don't seem to have a lot of control over. Borup: It is in the hand of ACRD. I don't have an answer to that. I think we can make some recommendations and let City Council look at it. Hatcher: The way we would want to word it to City Council would be that we recommend approval pending — Barbeiro: ACHD's commitment to widen that road. Hatcher: Commitment is not good enough. It has to be in writing. Barbeiro: Well, can the City work into a development agreement with ACHD as opposed to the developer. Hatcher: I don't think you want to bring the city into this. Borup: Why would the city want to. Barbeiro: We'd have a bigger gun than the developer does. Borup: To do what. Hatcher: We do? Meridian Planning and,?oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 19 Barbeiro: Sounded good. Borup: Lets go ahead. Lets get a recommendation drafted and put the conditions on you'd like to and --. At this point I assume your going to incorporate staff comments. Barbeiro: I have some comments within those too. Mr. Chairman, I move that we recommend approval to City Council request for preliminary plat of 17 lots on 107.06 acres in proposed L-0 zone and C -N zones for proposed Resolution Business Park by G.L. Voigt Development to include staff comments making note of Item 8 on page 6 that we would recommend an easement as opposed to a separately platted buffer— Swartley: Mr. Chairman, Mr. Barbeiro what are you trying to do an easement as opposed to a buffer? Barbeiro: As I read it, the staff wanted to have a separate common lot as opposed to an easement. Swartley: Oh okay. I understand. Barbeiro: That Item number 10 that applicant will go ahead and build a privacy fence, Item number 11, the applicant will built a vehicular access over the Hunter Lateral between site B and site A, included in that the developer will put a operable gate there with cooperation of the Meridian Fire Department to prevent student crossing to get over to Locust Grove. Help me out with number 12. The applicant wanted a minimum of 35 foot landscape buffer. We are going to allow them to put a meandering sidewalk as opposed to a sidewalk right up to the easement. Page 8, item 7 allowing them to— Swartley: Mr. Barbeiro could you repeat the numbers 10 and 11 for me please. Barbeiro: Number 10 were we—the developer build the privacy fence. Number 11 in his cross access between site B and site A we put an emergency gate or a gate between the two with the cooperation of the Meridian Fire Department. This is all subject to the recommendation of ACHD and the Meridian Fire Department. Borup: That was on the motion. Hatcher: Road improvements, refresh my memory. We going to tack that onto the preliminary plat or conditional use permit. Borup: I thought you were doing it on the conditional use permit. I think they lumped it all together. The traffic is going to be generated by the conditional use permit project not by the plat. Hatcher: Okay, lets see if I got this right. Meridian Planning and Zpning Commission May 9, 2000 ^ Page 20 Borup: ACHD's comments addressed everything all together. They combined all their comments as a project as a whole. Hatcher: The last outstanding issue I wanted to add to Commissioner Barbeiro's motion is that a written agreement between the developer and ACHD that coordinates and synchronizes construction completion of a 5 lane Overland improvement prior to the completion of phase one occupancy. The agreement be submitted to the City of Meridian prior to the issuance of a building permit. Norton: I would like to add to that motion that a revised preliminary plat to reflect the changes that have been discussed be submitted to the city prior to the City Council meeting. Borup: I think that was in the staff comments all ready. Hatcher: So you made the motion, we amended it so your going to have to second it. Barbeiro: To include their comments from Commissioner's Hatcher and Norton in the motion. Norton: I'll Second. Borup: Any other discussion. Seeing none, all in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Barbeiro: I wish to recommend approval to City Council request for conditional use permit for proposed planned commercial development consisting of multi family commercial, and LDS seminary in proposed L-0 and C -N zoning by G.L. Voigt Development to incorporate all of our notes from Item number 3. Borup: This was a conceptual concept that was made mention earlier. This is a conceptual approval of the project as a whole. Barbeiro: And to include that page 10, item 11 storage areas that we waive the requirement for storage areas, page 10 item 12 that we waive the requirement for a maintenance building. Borup: Actually that should come under item 5. Barbeiro: Thank you Mr. Chairman. You are correct. (Inaudible) make the recommendation for approval for incorporating all the comments from Item number 3. Hatcher: I will second that. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 21 Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: Okay now item number 5 which is the conditional use permit for the apartment complex. Barbeiro: I wish to recommend approval to City Council request for conditional use permit for proposed 200 unit luxury apartment complex to be zoned L-0 for proposed Resolution Business Park by Desert West Properties, LLC to include all comments from Item 3 and Item 4 and from page 10 item 11 the storage areas waiving the requirement for storage areas, page 10 item 12 waiving the requirement for a maintenance building, page 11 CP apartment complex, item number 2 where staff recommends a number of units constructed in phase one be limited to a maximum of 30, make that a maximum of 140. Hatcher: I second the motion. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman I wish to recommend approval to City Council request for conditional use permit for an ice arena consisting of office, pro shop, fitness center, restaurant, locker rooms, equipment storage and arenas zoned L-0 by Pat McKeegan to incorporate staff comments and comments from Item 3,4, and 5. Hatcher: Before this last issue is voted on, the preliminary plat did we property address the secondary emergency access to the high school. Borup: No we didn't. We spend time talking about it and then did not get it in the motion. We need to address that. We need to go back and amend the motion. Norton: I second the motion on number 6. Borup: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman, I wish to return to item number 3, the preliminary plat for the 17 lots and make an amendment to include the or note the developer will work in conjunction with the school district and arrange a secondary emergency access through their property apart from the primary access on Millenium Drive. Borup: Do you want to be more specific. Meridian Planning andZoning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 22 Hatcher: I think you want to be more specific in location. What I just heard you say is a second emergency access through the current development. I would prefer to have a second emergency access through break away bollards down at Raven Hill. Borup: The road is all ready there. The stub street is there. It is all ready dead ended. Hatcher: It is a stub street. You'd have to dead end it with emergency bollards. Barbeiro: Is the school property also part— Borup: That is a separate lot and they will not be coming before us for the school property. Hatcher: It is not part of phase one but it is part of this development. Barbeiro: I would concur. We have a secondary access from the south through one of the two roads that are coming in. Borup: Emergency break away bollards not direct vehicle access. I think that sounds consistent with ACHD wants also. The no vehicle access is consistent. We need a whole site. Hatcher: You have the adjacent Subdivisions. Borup: What do you want, street names. There is only two streets to choose from. Two out of the two. Go over and talk to staff. Let them choose a street and it not come from the north. Bruce, do you have any idea how man times in the last five years the fire department has ever gone through the break away bollard. Okay that's what I felt. Did you hear that comment Commissioner's? Commissioner's: No. Borup: As far as Bruce has understand it the fire department has never had to use emergency access and the break away bollards. I am saying it needs to be there, but its not going to be a traffic issue. Hatcher: The one street we are talking about is East Blue Tick Street. The other road appears to be South Red Cloud Avenue. Borup: The reason I asked that question maybe for anyone living in those areas, the emergency access not be a traffic—it hasn't happened yet in this town, but like anything it is an emergency. It is there for emergency, so its there. Brad did you have some input. The amended motion was to state a southern emergency access. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 23 Barbeiro: A southern emergency access with break away bollards and not regular traffic. Borup: No specific street? Hatcher: No specific streets required. Borup: So, if they can come up with another street, that's fine. Barbeiro: Before we make the final vote, lets see if staff has anything. Borup: The motion that is in effect now is that there be an emergency access from one of the southern streets, not from the northern. We did not specify beyond that. Did you have anything to add. Hawkins Clark: Commissioner just as a suggestion that was provided which has not been considered. As far as emergency there is here on Locust Grove, as I understand the goal of your discussion as a Commission is to help get emergency access so that Overland is not the only way. Another one on Locust. One suggestion is to provide on the southern portion emergency ingress egress here on the southern portion north of this LDS church that is being built between the retail and the daycare which does access the high school site. Borup: So, that could be a third option. Hawkins Clark: Could be in terms of accessibility and response time for EMS, police, fire. Certainly an argument can be made for greater direct access as compared to going through either Los Alamitos or Raven Hill. END OF SIDE TWO Borup: to work out as far as the access for them. Barbeiro: Okay lets go ahead and say that additional access the developer will work with the school district of the options themselves for along the southwest boundaries. Commissioner Norton, does that work for you? Okay. Hatcher: I second the amended motion. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Norton: Mr. Chairman I would like to have a little more discussion on number 5 with the apartment complex. 140 apartments, does that also include the club house? I'd like to Meridian Planning and—Zoning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 24 amend the motion then to include the club house to be constructed along with the 140 apartments. Borup: Is that different that the original or what the developer was planning. And the club house. Norton: Okay, I'll withdraw that. Borup: Anything or are we ready to move on. Let's take a short break. 7. TABLED FROM APRIL 11; 2000: REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL 77 FOOT HIGH POLE SIGN FOR CHEVRON/MCDONALDS BY EAGLE PARTNER, LLC -603 S. EAGLE ROAD: Borup: This item was tabled to allow more information which I think you've each received in your packets. Do we have any comments, questions or discussion or anybody ready for a motion. Norton: I am ready to make a motion on number 7. 1 would like to recommend to City Council the request for modification of conditional use permit to allow additional 77 foot high pole sign for Chevron/McDonalds by Eagle Partners be denied based on using the Comprehensive Plan as a guide only and taking into consideration the following: 1. The pylon sign was not addressed in the development agreement with the city on March 9, 1999. 2. This commission made a decision in June of 1999 that a pylon sign is inappropriate. 3. A Chevron pylon sign doesn't set an appropriate tone for entering the Magic View Subdivision. 4. This pylon sign is too close proximity to a neighborhood. Hatcher: I second the motion. Borup: Discussion. Barbeiro: When we voted in June of 1999 on this issue, the two primary items that I saw were that the light from this sign would be detrimental to the neighbors and that there was presented an ordinance that only freeway frontage could have such a sign. In our last— Borup: Freeway frontage or freeway business. Barbeiro: Freeway business I believe it was. And, as I recall—do we have such an ordinance. I was unable to find such an ordinance saying that freeway business or freeway frontage is a requirement for a pylon sign. Borup: I don't believe so. 200 E. C arttan Ave., Ste. 201 Meriden, IQ 83642 law Phone:(208)884,5533 CITY OF MERIDIAN Fax (208)888.6854 Planning ,. • RECEWED To; Becky BoyrjA Frons Sonya Day CITY O F MERIDIAN Fa)c 376-8713 Dat« 5115100 CIT`( CLERK OFFICE pf''Onsc Penes: 2 (Inducing cover) Res Resauhon Bus. Parte CC: Will 6erq M- qZ I $ O Ur9nt 0 For RwAQw 0 Phase CommeW O Please Rely ❑ Pies" Recycle •GOr*rmwrta MAY 15 '00 16:52 2088886854 PAGE.01 Memo Ta Becky Bowcutt From: Brad Hawklns-Clark'oO c CC: Shari Stiles, Will Berg, Bruce Freckleton Date: 05/15/00 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE Re: Fire Department Approval of Gates in Resolution Business Park (File No. PP -00-06) Becky, As you know, on 5/9100 the P&Z Commission recommended approval to City Council of the Resolution Business Park applications. All six applications are scheduled for hearing at the June 6, 2000 Council meeting. One of the pending items that the Commission included in their motion was to install an "operable gate" in the new road between Site A and B with the cooperation of the Fire Department in order to prevent students crossing over to Locust Grove. The size, exact placement, and type of construction all need to be finalized. Please work with Kenny Bowers, Fire Chief, on this and obtain written approval from Kenny priq_r to the meeting. Also, prior to the June e meeting, please submit a revised copy of the plat showing the new vehicular cross access between Site A and B, the preferred emergency access point (three options were discussed by P&Z), and other revisions as required in the Staff report. If possible, it would also be helpful to have details from ACHD on what warrants would be required in order to justify the new Locust/Overtand signal. Thanks, Brad • Page 1 MAY 15 '00 16:52 2088886854 PAGE.02 /ca CoUn��/d%�tic�hwcty ,C.Ji�tNict juay Heavey-Derr, President Dave Bivens, Vice President 318 East 37th Street Marlyss Meyer, Secretary Garden City, Idaho 83714-6499 Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Phone (208) 387-6100 Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner Fax (208) 387-6391 E-mail: tellus@achd.ada.id.us May 8, 2000 TO: G. L. Voigt MAY 1 5 2000 G. L. Voigt, Overland L.L.C. & Joint School District No. 2 P.O. Box 2044 CITY OF MERIDIAN Idaho Falls, ID 83403 FROM: Steve Arnold, Principal Development Analyst Planning & Development SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat: Resolution Business Park Locust Grove and Overland Roads On May 3, 2000, the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District (hereafter called "District") took action on the preliminary Plat as stated on the attached staff report. In order that the Final Plat may be considered by the District for acceptance, the Developer shall cause the following applicable standard conditions to be satisfied prior to District certification and endorsement: Drainage plans shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. 2. If public street improvements are required: Prior to any construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way, the following shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. a. Three complete sets of detailed street construction drawings prepared by an Idaho registered professional Engineer. b. Execute and Inspection Agreement between the Developer and the District together with initial payment deposit for inspection and/or testing services. C. Complete all street improvements to the satisfaction of the District, or execute a Surety Agreement between the Developer and the District to guarantee the completion of the construction of all required street improvements. 3. Furnish a copy of the Final Plat showing street names as approved by the Local Government Agency having such authority together with the payment of fee charged for the manufacturing and installation of all street signs. 2 '^ 4. If Public Right -of -Way Trust Fund deposit is required, make the deposit to the District in the form of cash or cashier's check for the amount specified by the District. 5. Furnish easements, agreements and all other datum or documents as required by the District. 6. Furnish Final Plat drawings together with the plat and plan review fees for District acceptance and endorsement. The final plat must contain the signed endorsement of the Owner and the Land Surveyor's certification. 7. All of the material must be submitted to District staff two -weeks prior to Commission review of the final plat. 8. Approval of the plat is valid for one year. The Commission will consider an extension of one year if requested within 15 -days prior to the expiration date. Please contact me at (208) 387-6170, should you have any questions. Cc: Planning & Development Chron/File Planning & Development Services -City of Meridian Construction Services — John Edney Drainage- Chuck Rinaldi Stan McHutchison Briggs Engineering, Inc. 1800 W. Overland Road Boise, ID 83705 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT Planning and Development Division Development Application Report Preliminary Plat — Resolution Business Park / MAZ00-004/MCUP00-015/MCUP00-016/ Locust Grove Rd/Overland Road MCUP00-017 An application for a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City of Meridian for a 17 -lot residential and commercial subdivision on 107.06 -acres. The applicant is also requesting conditional use and rezone approval. The City has forwarded the application to ACHD for review and comment. The site is located at the southeast corner of Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. This development is estimated to generate 9,430 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic study. Roads impacted by this development: Locust Grove Road Overland Road ACHD Commission Date — May 3, 2000 - 12:00 p.m. Will Berg From: jansyl@micron.net Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 9:07 AM To: bergw@ci.meridian.id.us Subject: Fw: G.L. Voigt Development of Resolution Business Park City Council Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 5:39 PM Subject: G.L. Voigt Development of Resolution Business Park City Council To: Meridian City Council Re: G.L. Voigt Development Mr. Berg, I, f1,1"', (�}' J U IN - 08 2000 CITY OF NIERIDI40i Tammy DeWeerd suggested I send the following information to you in the event I am unable to attend the 6/6/00 meeting regarding G. L. Voigt and the development of Resolution Business Park. I currently reside in the Summerfield Subdivision at the NE corner of Ustick and North Locust Grove in the city of Meridian. This subdivision was developed by G.L. Voigt (a few phases were not, but I am addressing the ones that were). TL.- �_._- Will Berg Trc,nt S From: jansyl@micron.net��— Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 9:07 AM To: bergw@ci.meridian.id.us —� Subject: Fw: G.L. Voigt Development of Resolution Business Park City Council J U N Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 5:39 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN Subject: G.L. Voigt Development of Resolution Business Park City Council To: Meridian City Council Re: G.L. Voigt Development Mr. Berg, Tammy DeWeerd suggested I send the following information to you in the event I am unable to attend the 6/6/00 meeting regarding G. L. Voigt and the development of Resolution Business Park. I currently reside in the Summerfield Subdivision at the NE corner of Ustick and North Locust Grove in the city of Meridian. This subdivision was developed by G.L. Voigt ( a few phases were not, but I am addressing the ones that were). The developer was responsible for the perimeter fence. A fence was erected, however the section on Locust Grove is falling over after only three years. The developer was responsible for the pressurized irrigation system. A trouble -prone pooly designed system was installed causing several homeowners unneccessary expenses. The developer was responsible for drainage in the subdivsion. Houses were built such that water drains to the adjacent house to the rear. No drainage was installed between the 'park' and the adjacent lots causing the park to drain to the adjacent properties. Drainage problems occur in the street storm drains, they appear to be under -sized. The deveoper was responsible for each lot being built. There is one home in Summerfield that has been under construction for 6 years. The developer was supposed to provide a common area 230 x 140, large enough to accomodate a soccer field. I still haven't come across that yet. If the Council decides to approve the development of Resolution Park by G. L.. Voigt what, if any, checks and balances will there be to assure that: a) the project won't fall apart in 3 years b) quality design will be used c) drainage problems will be addressed and resolved prior to construction d) the project will be completed e) the developer will provide all that has been agreed upon Thank you, Jan Sylvester 1775 E. Summerheights Drive Meridian, Idaho 6/6/00 83642 208 8845680 6/6/00 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT Planning and Development Division Development Application Report Preliminary Plat — Resolution Business Park / Locust Grove Rd/Overland Road MAZ00-004/MCUP00-015/MCUP00-016/ MCUP00-017 An application for a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City of Meridian for a 17 -lot residential and commercial subdivision on 107.06 -acres. The applicant is also requesting conditional use and rezone approval. The City has forwarded the application to ACHD for review and comment. The site is located at the southeast corner of Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. This development is estimated to generate 9,430 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic study. Roads impacted by this development: Locust Grove Road Overland Road ACHD Commission Date — May 3, 2000 - 12:00 p.m. Resolution Subdivision Page 1 R1 INTERSTATE 84 1-L MERIDIAN CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY RT i i BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. cim:�) (208)344-9700 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD BOISE, IDAHO 83705 C -G R1 I \ RESQLU I -L SED UBDIVIS 500 \ 1 0 T 500 C -G RT 11000 Feet PROPOSED REZONE REVISION RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20, T.3N., R.IE., B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO SHEET 1 OF 1 DESIGN DRAFT SCALE DATE DWG. NO. \0101.APR BKB 1"=500' 02101/00 1 0101 LOCUST GROVE ROAD FIGURE 3 ' © O — _ _ RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC a YR. 2005 y� I E 81 �J � 0 �0 .. E m I t D ,. r a' D Z I .wnrtn.n,TZ I i D I omoe i 1 � - t-s000 -► _ I I 1' �..� -.4-6000 Ir o g .. ---- -NO- ADT -00- AVERAGE ►AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC Traftic Study PreQared By. 1 0 JE I DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. i ors�a Facts and Findings: A. General Information Owner — G.I. Voigt Applicant - Same R-4, RT - Existing zoning L -O, C -G - Requested zoning 107.06 - Acres 17 - Proposed lots 200 - Proposed multi -family dwelling units 346,000 - Square feet of proposed building 125,000 -square feet of Office building 145,000 -square feet of Retail building 57,000 -square feet of an Ice Rink 19,000 -square feet of Day Care Center Meridian High School 2,300 - Total lineal feet of proposed public streets 286 - Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) West Ada - Impact Fee Service Area Meridian - Impact Fee Assessment District Locust Grove Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count 3,552 on 7-16-99 A -Existing Level of Service C -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 950 -feet of frontage 50 to 70 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Locust Grove Road is improved with two lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. The segment of Locust Grove Road abutting the site is not listed in the current Five Year Work Program for reconstruction. Overland Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count 11,422 on 11-30-99 (west of Eagle Road) Traffic count 9,916 on 11-23-99 (west of Locust Grove Road) D -Existing Level of Service E -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 2,640 -feet of frontage 50 to 70 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Resolution Subdivision Page 2 FMQ Overland Rod is improved with two lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. The segment of Overland Road abutting the site is listed in the current Five -Year Work Program for reconstruction to 5 -lane in FY (2004). Blue Tick Street/Brandvs Jewel Street Local streets with no bike lane designation No traffic count available 50 -feet of frontage 50 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 50 -feet required right-of-way for their extensions Blue Tick Street and Brandys Jewel Street are improved as 37 -foot street section with curb, gutter and sidewalk. B. On March 27, 2000, the District Planning and Development staff inspected this site and evaluated the transportation system in the vicinity. On March 31, 2000, the staff met as the District's Technical Review Committee and reviewed the impacts of this proposed development on the District's transportation system. The results of that analysis constitute the following Facts and Findings and recommended Site Specific Requirements. C. Locust Grove Road has 3,522 existing vehicle trips per day, which is a Level of Service A (LOS A). An acceptable Level of Service for this segment of roadway is D (LOS D) or 14,000 vehicle trips per day. The proposed application will add approximately 3,000 vehicle trips per day on Locust Grove Road. D. Current traffic counts indicate that Overland Road carries 11,422 vehicle trips per day (VTD). The planning threshold for Overland Road is 14, 000 VDT with its current configuration. When Overland Road is rebuilt to five lanes, the planning threshold for Overland Road will be 33,000 VTD. The proposed application will add approximately 6,000 vehicle trips per day on Overland Road, therefore the existing, plus project traffic exceeds the planning threshold of Overland Road with its current configuration. When Overland Road is rebuilt to five -lanes, the roadway will be adequate to accommodate the traffic generated from this site. E. The Eagle Road/Overland Road intersection operates at a Level of Service E/F threshold, and is listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The subject site's additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. The District has already initiated a project (to be started within the next few months) to provide additional turn lanes and make other capacity enhancements to improve the intersections' operating characteristics. The improvement plans have not been finalized but the anticipation is for a substantial increase in capacity. F. The Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection operates at a Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The subject site's additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. G. A traffic study was submitted for the Resolution Subdivision site development plan. The key findings of the traffic study include the following: Resolution Subdivision Page 3 • The proposed development is expected to generate 12,495 total daily vehicle trips. An estimated 3,045 trips are pass -by trips, leaving 9,430 new daily vehicle trips added to the adjacent roadway system. • The Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection currently operates at Level of Service (LOS) F. Because Meridian Road is a principal arterial, LOS E is acceptable under current District policy. The intersection exceeds the allowable Level of Service. • Under "existing plus project" traffic volumes (Year 2005), the Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection is expected to operate at Level of Service (LOS) F. The District has currently programmed a project to upgrade Overland Road to create additional capacity. The design and magnitude of the improvements have not yet been determined. Because Meridian Road is a principal arterial, LOS E is acceptable under current District policy. • The Locust Grove Road/Overland Road intersection currently operates at an overall Level of Service (LOS) A. The intersection is STOP controlled only on the two Locust Grove Road approaches. Left turns from northbound Locust Grove on to westbound Overland Road operate at an LOS F condition. If a traffic signal were constructed with the existing traffic volumes and roadway geometry, the intersection would operate at an overall LOS B. • Under the existing traffic volumes, bot '� ' n ' Locust Grove Road operates at an arterial LOS of A with volume -to -capacity ratios of less than 0.35 during peak hour conditions. • The Year 2020 traffic forecast of 18,000 vehicles per day for Overland Road indicates the need to widen the roadway from two to five lanes. The widening is desirable from an operational and safety standpoint and is required within 500 feet of the Eagle Road intersection. • The Year 2020 traffic forecast of 8,700 vehicles per day for Locust Grove Road does not indicate the need to add capacity. • The forecast traffic volumes at the Locust Grove Road intersection with Overland Road justify a traffic signal under existing plus project traffic volumes. The applicant should be required to provide 25 -percent of the cost for the traffic signal, which is $37,500.00. The District will constrict the traffic signal when it is warranted. • The site driveways on Overland Road are expected to have traffic volumes low enough that traffic signals are not needed. • The new public street intersection on Overland Road is expected to have traffic volumes that warrant a traffic signal. The applicant should be required to provide 75 -percent of the cost to construct the traffic signal, which is $112,500.00 (total cost is $150,000). The District will construct the traffic signal when it is warranted. • The site driveway intersections on Locust Grove Road are expected to have traffic volumes low enough that traffic signals are not needed, however, all the intersections on Locust Grove Road will require the construction of a center turn lane. • All the intersections on Overland Road will require the construction of a center turn lane. Due to the locations of the intersections and the taper lengths required for the turn lanes, the applicant would be required to add another traffic lane on Overland Road abutting the entire site. • The consultant was not aware of ACHD's project to widen the Overland Road/Eagle Road intersection when the TIS was performed. The Eagle Road/Overland Road intersection was identified to operate at Level of Service (LOS) F under existing and build out conditions. The District is adding turn -lanes at the intersection this fiscal year, Resolution Subdivision Page 4 W which will improve the operations of the intersection to an adequate Level of Service D (LOS D). Overland Road is scheduled for reconstruction from two to five lanes in FY 2004. When the roadway is reconstructed to five lanes, the intersection will operate at an adequate Level of Service C (LOS Q. H. The applicant is proposing a stub street to the south property line located 1,000 -feet west of the east property line. District Staff supports the location of the stub street. The applicant should provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub street with a temporary easement provided to the District. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that; "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. I. The applicant is proposing a stub street to the east property line located 400 -feet south of Overland Road. District Staff supports the location of the stub street. The applicant should provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub street with a temporary easement provided to the District. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that; "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. The improvement of Overland Road abutting this development is included in the District's current Five Year Work Program. District policy requires the applicant to provide a $52,800.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the parcel (approximately 2,640 -feet) prior to District approval of a final plat, whichever occurs first. K. The improvement of Locust Grove Road abutting this development is not included in the District's current Five Year Work Program. District policy requires the applicant to construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel prior to District approval of a final plat. The sidewalk should be located two feet within the new right-of-way of Locust Grove Road. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. L. The applicant is proposing two driveways on Locust Grove Road. The driveways are located as follows: ♦ The northern driveway is proposed to be located 440 -feet south of Overland Road. ♦ The southern driveway is proposed to be located 690 -feet south of Overland Road. Peacock Street intersects Locust Grove Road from the west approximately 550 -feet south of Overland Road and Labrador Street approximately 1,100 -feet south of Overland Road. District policy requires the applicant to locate driveways on Locust Grove Road a minimum of 440 -feet south of Overland Road and 220 -feet from the streets on the west side of Locust Grove Road. The applicant's proposed driveways do not meet the required offset from Peacock Street on the west side of Locust Grove Road. The applicant should be required to locate the northern driveway to align with Peacock Street to west, and the southern driveway should be located 75 - feet north of the south property line. The driveways should be constructed 30 to 35 -foot wide Resolution Subdivision Page 5 with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the roadway. The applicant should be required to provide 100 -feet of stacking for both the inbound and out -bound travel lanes for the driveway. ;Coordinate the design of the driveways with District staff. M. The applicant is proposing three driveways on Overland Road. The driveways are located as follows: ♦ 480 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 930 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 1,280 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of stacking for this driveway. All the driveways align with existing driveways on the north side of the road, which meets District policy. The driveways should be constructed 30 to 35 -feet wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the existing roadway edge. N. The applicant is proposing to construct two public roads off Overland Road. The roads are proposed to be located: ♦ 320 -feet west of the east property line: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to locate driveways off this public street a minimum of 100 -feet south of Overland Road. The roadway should be constructed as a 40 -foot street section with curbs gutters and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58 -feet of right-of-way. ♦ 850 -feet west of the east property line: based on the submitted traffic study this roadway should be signalized and driveways on this roadway should be located a minimum of 175 -feet south of Overland Road and consecutive driveways should be required to align or offset a minimum of 150 -feet. The roadway should be constructed as a 46 -foot street section with curbs, gutters, and a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 64 -feet of right-of-way. This road should be signalized. The applicant should be required to construct a signal for the new intersection. Coordinate the design of the signalized intersection with District staff. The District should provide 25 -percent of the cost of the signal. ♦ The applicant is proposing an east/west road located 400 -feet south of Overland Road: the applicant should be required to locate driveways on the new roadway a minimum of 50 -feet from a public street intersection. The applicant is proposing a traffic circles within the roadway. The street section around the traffic circle should be constructed 29 -feet wide. A YIELD sign should be installed at all approaches into the islands and directional islands should be constructed in the street approaches to the traffic circles to guide motorists in the proper direction. The pedestrian crossings shall be located at the intersection to Resolution Subdivision Page 6 5 W improve pedestrian/vehicular recognition and safety. Coordinate the traffic control plan and location of the pedestrian crossings with District staff. In order to provide safe turning movements into the driveways and streets on Overland Road and avoid a continuous meandering travel path a continuous turning lane is required from Locust Grove Road to the east property line. The design will provide turning movement at all driveways and streets through and including Locust Grove and new east -west street. O. ACHD's Park & Ride Division Staff have indicated the need for a park and ride location at the applicant's site. The District requests that applicant grant the District an easement for a 10 to 12 - space Park & Ride area at this site. Commuteride staff will contact the applicant to coordinate the location of the Park & Ride area. P. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that Tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Pat Nelson at 387-6160. Q. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, it is recommended that the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. R. A Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) is formed with a coordinator that works as a liaison between businesses and private and public transportation providers to increase the use of alternative transportation and other trip reduction measures (shuttle buses, bus pass programs, vanpools, carpools, bicycle and walking enhancements). An annual survey will be required of the TMA/TMO to monitor participation in alternative transportation programs and forwarded to the A.CHD Commuteride Office. S. District policy states that direct access to arterials and collectors is normally restricted and that the developer shall try to use combined access points. In accordance with District policy the applicant should be required to provide a recorded cross access easement among the lots within the proposed subdivision for use to access the public streets prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits). T. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Locust Grove Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. U. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Overland Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. V. Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with past action by the District the applicant should be required to pave all driveways their full width and at least 30 -feet into the site beyond the edge of Resolution Subdivision Page 7 pavement of Overland Road and Locust Grove Road and install pavement tapers with 15 -foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. W. h1 accordance with District policy, stub streets to the undeveloped parcels abutting this site may be required upon review of a future application for this site. X. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, may be placed on future development of this parcel. Y. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the school parcel abutting this site should be extended upon review of a future application for this site. Z. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will require improvement in order to accommodate the additional traffic generated by this proposed development. The Overland Road/Meridian Road intersection currently operates at deficient Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of the 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The reconstruction of the intersection by the District is not listed in ACHD's Five year Work Program. The following Site Specific Requirements and Standard Requirements must be met or provided for prior to ACHD approval of the final plat: Special Recommendation to City of Meridian: In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Ms Pat Nelson at 387-6160. 2. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) should be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is fonned with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. 3. ACHD's Park & Ride Division Staff have indicated the need for a park and ride location at the applicant's site. The District requests that applicant grant the District an easement for a 10 to 12 -space Park & Ride area at this site. Comnmteride staff will contact the applicant to coordinate the location of the Park & Ride area. 4. The transportation system will require improvement in order to accommodate the additional traffic generated by additional development. The Overland Road/Meridian Road intersection currently operates at a deficient Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. Additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. The reconstruction of the Overland Road/Meridian Road Street intersection is not currently listed in ACHD's Five year Work Program. Resolution Subdivision Page 8 Site Specific Requirements: Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Overland Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right- of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #193. 2. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right- of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #193. 3. Provide a stub street to the south property line located 1,000 -feet west of the east property line. Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. 4. Provide a stub street to the east property line located 400 -feet south of Overland Road. Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. Provide a $112,500.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for 75 -percent of the cost to construct a traffic signal on Overland Road for the new collector roadway. The District will construct the signal when it is warranted. 6. Provide a $37,500.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for 25 -percent of the cost of constructing a traffic signal at the Overland Road/Locust Grove Road intersection. The District will construct the signal when it is warranted. Provide a $52,800.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the parcel (approximately 2,640 -feet) prior to District approval of a final plat, whichever occurs first. 8. Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel prior to District approval of a final plat. Locate the sidewalk two feet within the new right-of-way of Locust Grove Road. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. Resolution Subdivision Page 9 9. Locate two driveways on Locust Grove Road as follows: ♦ The northern driveway shall be located 550 -feet south of Overland Road to align with Peacock Street to the west. ♦ The southern driveway shall be located 75 -feet north of the south property line. The driveways shall be constructed 30 to 35 -foot wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the roadway. Provide 100 -feet of stacking for both the inbound and out -bound travel lanes for the driveways. Coordinate the design of the driveways with District staff. 10. Locate three driveways on Overland Road as follows: ♦ 480 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 930 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 1,280 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 100 -feet of stacking for this driveway. The driveways shall be constructed 30 to 35 -feet wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the existing roadway edge. 11. Locate two public roads as follows: ♦ off Overland Road 320 -feet west of the east property line: locate driveways off this public street a minimum of 100 -feet south of Overland Road. The roadway shall be constructed as a 40 -foot street section with curbs gutters and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58 -feet of right-of-way. ♦ off Overland Road 850 -feet west of the east property line: driveways off this roadway shall be located a minimum of 175 -feet south of Overland Road and consecutive driveways are required to align or offset a minimum of 150 -feet. The roadway shall be constructed as a 46 -foot street section with curbs, gutters, and a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 64 -feet of right-of-way. The applicant shall be required to construct a signal for the roadway/Overland Road intersection. Coordinate the design of the signalized intersection with District staff. 12. Locate an east/west road 400 -feet south of Overland Road: locate driveways on the east/west roadway a minimum of 50 -feet from a public street intersection. The traffic circle within the roadway shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 29 -feet wide street section around the traffic circle. A YIELD sign shall be installed at all approaches into the island and a directional island shall be constructed in the street approaches to the traffic circle to guide motorists in the proper direction. The pedestrian crossings shall be located at the intersection to improve pedestrian/vehicular recognition and safety. Coordinate the design of the buffer circle, the traffic control plan and location of the pedestrian crossings with District staff. Resolution Subdivision Page 10 � r..N 13. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, shall be placed on future development of this parcel. 14. Construct a center turn lane on Overland Road abutting the entire site. 15. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the school parcel abutting this site should be extended upon review of a future application for this site. 16. Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Overland Road and Locust Grove Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. Standard Requirements: A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity. The written request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for ACHD Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its original decision The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. 3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. Resolution Subdivision Page 11 .10� 6. Constriction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 8. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 9. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusion of Law: ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development Division at 387-6170. Submitted by Commission Action: Planning and Development Staff May 3, 2000 Resolution Subdivision Page 12 JuLiE KLErN FLSCHER Wm. F. QGRAY, In BRENT J. JOHNSON D. SAmuEL JOHNSON WILLIAM A. MoRRow WELL,AM F. NrcHoLs CHRISTOPHER S. NYE PH¢.IP A. PETERSON STEPHEN L. PRuss ERIC S. ROSSMAN TODD A. RossMAN DAviD M. SwARTLEY TERRENCER. WHITE WHITE, PETERSON, PRUSS, MORROW & GIGRAY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAw 200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE POST OFFICE Box 1150 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680-1150 TEL 208) 288-2499 FAX( 08) 288-2501 May 30, 2000 To: Staff Applicant Affected Property Owner(s) Re: Application Case No. PP -00-006 Hearing Date: Tune 6, 2000 M� NAMPA OFFICE 104 NINTH AvfiNuE SOUTH POST OFFICE Box 247 NAMPA, IDAHO 83653-0247 TEL.208) 466-9272 FAX (208) 4664405 PLEASE REPLY TO MERIDIAN OFFICE RDS J U N - 1 2000 CITY OF M ERID.IAN FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Staff, Applicant and/or Affected Property Owner(s): Please note that these Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be presented to the pity Council at the public hearing on the above referenced matter by the Plannin and Zoning Administrator. Due to the volume of matters which the City Council must decide, and to insure your position is understood and clear, it is important to have a consistent format by which matters are presented at the public hearings before the City Council. The City Council strongly recommends: That you take time to carefully review the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, and be prepared to state your position on this application by addressing the Findings and Recommendations of the Planlung and Zoning Commission; and 2. That you carefully complete (be sure it is legible) the Position Statement if You disa ee with the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Position Statement form for this application is available at the City Clerk's office. It is recommended that you pprepare a Position Statement and deliver it to the City Clerk prior to the hearing, if possible. If that is not possible, please present your Position Statement to the City Council at the hearing, along with eight (8) copies. The co 'es will be presented to the Mayor, Council, Planning and Zoning Administrator, Public Works and the City Attorney. If you are a part of a ggrroup, it is strongly recommended that one Position Statement be filled out for the group, wFiich can be signed by the representative for the group. Very truly yours, lity�Attomey' 0ffice BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK, G.L. VOIGT, Applicant Case No. PP -00-006 RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL 1. The property is approximately 107.06 acres in size and is generally located at the SE corner of Overland Road and S. Locust Grove Road in Meridian, Idaho 2. The owner of record of the subject property is G.L. Voigt and Joint School District No. 2. 3. The Applicant is G.L. Voigt, Idaho Falls, Idaho. 4. The subject property is currently zoned Ada County R -T . The zoning of C -N and L -O is defined within the City of Meridian's Zoning and Development Ordinance Section 11-7-2. 5. The proposed site of the subject property is generally located at the SE corner of Overland Road and South Locust Grove Road with approximately 1/2 mile of frontage along Overland. The future high school parcel is currently land -locked and directly south of the 36 -acre parcel. Surrounded on the North is an R.V. park, Cesco (John Deere), Transport, Truck & Trailers, future location of Treasure Valley RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 1 PRELIMINARY PLAT -RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK - G.L. VOIGT Music, and two vacant parcels. All are zoned C -G (Meridian). To the South is an LDS Church which is currently being constructed on the Ada County parcel immediately south of the Overland, LLC parcel fronting on Locust Grove. Rim View Subdivision, zoned R-1 in Ada County, is south of the church. Raven Hill and Los Alamitos Subdivision, zoned R-4 (Meridian), lie south of the school parcel. East of the property are several large, vacant parcels currently in agricultural use, all are zoned RT (Ada County). To the West of the subject parcels are several phases of Sportsman Pointe Subdivision, zoned R-4, which lie across Locust Grove Road. There is also an unplatted, triangular shaped parcel at the SW corner of the intersection that is not in City limits, zoned RT (Ada County), with a single family residence. 6. The subject property is within the city limits of the City of Meridian. 7. The entire parcel of the property is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 8. The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following manner: business park. 9. There are no significant or scenic features of major importance that affect the consideration of this application. RECOMMENDATION 1. The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT -RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK - G.L. VOIGT the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the preliminary plat as requested by the Applicant for the property described in the application, subject to the following: Adopt the Planning and Zoning Administrator and Assistant City Engineer Recommendations as follows: 1.1 Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 1.2 Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 1.3 Applicant shall be required to enter into a Re -Assessment Agreement with the City of Meridian for all commercial uses. 1.4 Sanitary sewer service to this site will be via extensions from the Five Mile Trunk that is currently under construction by this applicant. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline. 1.5 Water service to this site will be via extensions from newly constructed mains under the interstate, and from extensions of existing mains installed in adjacent developments. Applicant will be responsible to construct the water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Please provide the Public works department with information on anticipated fire flow and domestic water requirements for the proposed site. Water service to this development is contingent upon positive results from a hydraulic analysis by our computer model. Flow and pressure from the existing mains should be monitored with the Meridian Water Department. 1.6 Two -hundred -fifty- and 100 -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT -RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK - G.L. VOIGT All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 1.7 Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on site. Please submit hook-up and design details based on the proposed landscaping. Due to the size of landscaped area, primary water supply connection to the City's mains will not be allowed. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area. 1.8 Applicant has not indicated whether the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and maintained by an association or the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. If the system is being proposed as a private system, plans and specifications for the irrigation system shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department as part of the development plan. review process. A draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system O&M manual must be submitted prior to plan approval. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area. 1.9 Show all existing easements for irrigation/drainage facilities located within the boundaries of this proposed development (i.e. Hunter Lateral easements). 1.10. Detailed landscape plans for the Overland Road and Locust Grove Road landscape frontage buffers and for street landscaping along Millennium Way and Celebration Avenue shall be submitted for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat application. This requirement does not include interior lot landscaping. Interior landscaping will be dealt with on a site by site review basis with future CUP applications. A letter of credit or cash surety will be required for the improvements prior to signature on the Final Plat. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 4 PRELIMINARY PLAT -RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK - G.L. VOIGT 1.11 Staff recommended the Overland and Locust Road landscape buffers be platted as separate common lots within the subdivision and maintenance be the responsibility of the Development Committee/ Association. However, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend an easement as opposed to a separately platted buffer zone. 1.12 Six -foot -high, permanent perimeter fencing shall be required along the eastern boundary of Lot 1, Block 3, and Lot 2, Block 1, and along the southern boundary of Lot 15 & 16, Block 1. Submit detailed fencing plans for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat. All required fencing is to be in place prior to issuance of building permits. 1.13. The Applicant will construct a privacy fence along the east boundary of the Hunter Lateral. 1.14 Applicant shall provide a vehicular access across the Hunter Lateral between Site "A" and Site "B" and the developer will install an in- operable gate with cooperation of the Meridian Fire Department to prevent students crossing to Locust Grove Road. 1.15 Applicant shall provide 35 feet of landscape buffer along Overland Road and a meandering sidewalk. 1.16 Applicant shall enter into a written agreement with ACHD that coordinates and synchronizes construction completion of the five lane Overland Road improvement prior to the completion of Phase I occupancy. The Agreement must be submitted to the City of Meridian prior to the issuance of a building permit. 1.17 The revised Preliminary Plat must be submitted to the City prior to the City Council meeting at which it will be heard. Adopt the Recommendations of the Meridian Fire Department as follows: 1.18 All fire codes will have to be met. Adopt the Recommendations of the Central District Health Department as follows: 1.19 The Applicant's central sewage and central water plans must be RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 5 PRELIMINARY PLAT -RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK - G.L. VOIGT submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality. 1.20 Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. 1.21 Stormwater shall be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality. 1.22 The Engineers and architects involved with the design of the subject project shall obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that prevents groundwater and surface water degradation. The Planning and Zoning Commission further recommended: 1.23 For additional access the developer will work with the School District on the options for along the SW boundaries. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows: 1.24 In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. 1.25 In order to reduce trips to and from this development, the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) should be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. 1.26 ACHD's Park & Ride Division Staff have indicated the need for a park and ride location at the applicant's site. The District requests that applicant grant the District an easement for a 10 to 12 -space Park & Ride area at this site. Commuteride staff will contact the applicant to coordinate the location of the Park S& Ride area. 1.27 The transportation system will require improvement in order to RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 6 PRELIMINARY PLAT -RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK - G.L. VOIGT accommodate the additional traffic generated by additional development. The Overland Road/Meridian Road intersection currently operates at a deficient Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. Additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. The reconstruction of the Overland Road/Meridian Road Street intersection is not listed in ACHD's Five Year Work Program. 1.28 Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Overland Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. 1.29 Dedicate 43 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. 1.30 Provide a stub street to the south property line located 1,000 -feet west of the east property line. 1.31 Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. 1.32 Provide a stub street to the east property line located 400 -feet south of Overland Road. Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. 1.33 Provide a S 112,500.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for 75 -percent of the cost to construct a traffic signal on Overland Road for the new collector roadway. The District will construct the signal when it is warranted. 1.34 Provide a $37,500.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for 25 -percent of the cost of constructing a traffic signal at the Overland RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 7 PRELIMINARY PLAT -RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK - G.L. VOIGT Road/Locust Grove Road intersection. The District will construct the signal when it is warranted. 1.35 Provide a $52,800.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the parcel (approximately 2,640 -feet) prior to District approval of a Final plat, whichever occurs First. 1.36 . Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel prior to District approval of a final plat. Locate the sidewalk two feet within the new right-of-way of Locust Grove Road. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. 1.37 Locate two driveways on Locust Grove Road as follows: • The northern driveway shall be located 550 -feet south of Overland Road to align with Peacock Street to the west. • The southern driveway shall be located 75 -feet north of the south property line. The driveways shall be constructed 30 to 35 -foot wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the roadway. Provide 100 -feet of stacking for both the inbound and out -bound travel lanes for the driveways. Coordinate the design of the driveways with District staff. 1.38 Locate three driveways on Overland Road as follows: • 480 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. • 930 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. • 1,280 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 100 -feet of stacking for this driveway. The driveways shall be constructed 30 to 35 -feet wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the existing roadway edge. 1.39 Locate two public roads as follows: • off Overland Road 320 -feet west of the east property line: locate driveways off this public street a minimum of 100 -feet south of RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 8 PRELIMINARY PLAT -RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK - G.L. VOIGT Overland Road. The roadway shall be constructed as a 40 -foot street section with curbs gutters and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58 - feet of right-of-way. • off Overland Road 850 -feet west of the east property line: driveways off this roadway shall be located a minimum of 175 -feet south of Overland Road and consecutive driveways are required to align or offset a minimum of 150 -feet. The roadway shall be constructed as a 46 -foot street section with curbs, gutters, and a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 64 -feet of right-of-way. The applicant shall be required to construct a signal for the roadway/Overland Road intersection. Coordinate the design of the signalized intersection with District staff. 1.40 Locate an east/west road 400 -feet south of Overland Road: locate driveways on the east/west roadway a minimum of 50 -feet from a public street intersection. The traffic circle within the roadway shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 29 -feet wide street section around the traffic circle. A YIELD sign shall be installed at all approaches into the island and a directional island shall be constructed in the street approaches to the traffic circle to guide motorists in the proper direction. The pedestrian crossings shall be located at the intersection to improve pedestrian/vehicular recognition and safety. Coordinate the design of the buffer circle, the traffic control plan and location of the pedestrian crossings with District staff. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, shall be placed on future development of this parcel. 1.41 Construct a center turn lane on Overland Road abutting the entire site. 1.42 In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the school parcel abutting this site should be extended upon review of a future application for this site. 1.43 Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Overland Road and Locust Grove Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. ZAWor1,VV1\ Meridian 15360M\Recommendations\ResolutionPPRec.wpd RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 9 PRELIMINARY PLAT -RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK - G.L. VOIGT RECEIVED MAY 15 2000 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT CITY OF MERIDIAN Planning and Development Division CITY CLERK OFFICE Development Application Report Preliminary Plat — Resolution Business Park / Locust Grove Rd/Overland Road MAZ00-004/MCUP00-015/N4CUP00-016/ MCUP00-017 An application for a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City of Meridian for a 17 -lot residential and commercial subdivision on 107.06 -acres. The applicant is also requesting conditional use and rezone approval. The City has forwarded the application to ACHD for review and comment. The site is located at the southeast corner of Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. This development is estimated to generate 9,430 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic study. Roads impacted by this development: Locust Grove Road Overland Road ACHD Commission Date — May 3, 2000 - 12:00 p.m. Facts and Findings: A. General Information Owner — G.I. Voigt Applicant - Same R-4, RT - Existing zoning L -O, C -G - Requested zoning 107.06 - Acres 17 - Proposed lots 200 - Proposed multi -family dwelling units 346,000 - Square feet of proposed building : 125,000 -square feet of Office building : 145,000 -square feet of Retail building : 57,000 -square feet of an Ice Rink : 19,000 -square feet of Day Care Center : Meridian High School 2,300 - Total lineal feet of proposed public streets 286 - Traffic Analysis Zone JAZ) West Ada - Impact Fee Service Area Meridian - Impact Fee Assessment District Locust Grove Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count 3,552 on 7-16-99 A -Existing Level of Service C -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 950 -feet of frontage 50 to 70 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Locust Grove Road is improved with two lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. The segment of Locust Grove Road abutting the site is not listed in the current Five Year Work Proeram for reconstruction. Overland Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count 11,422 on 11-30-99 (west of Eagle Road) Traffic count 9,916 on 11-23-99 (west of Locust Grove Road) D -Existing Level of Service E -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 2,640 -feet of frontage 50 to 70 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Resolution Subdivision Pane Overland Rod is improved with two lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. The segment of Overland Road abutting the site is listed in the current Five -Year Work Program for reconstruction to 5 -lane in FY (2004). Blue Tick Street/Brandys Jewel Street Local streets with no bike lane designation No traffic count available 50 -feet of frontage 50 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 50 -feet required right-of-way for their extensions Blue Tick Street and Brandys Jewel Street are improved as 37 -foot street section with curb, gutter and sidewalk. B. On March 27, 2000, the District Planning and Development staff inspected this site and evaluated the transportation system in the vicinity. On March 31, 2000, the staff met as the District's Technical Review Committee and reviewed the impacts of this proposed development on the District's transportation system. The results of that analysis constitute the following Facts and Findings and recommended Site Specific Requirements. C. Locust Grove Road has 3,522 existing vehicle trips per day, which is a Level of Service A (LOS A). An acceptable Level of Service for this segment of roadway is D (LOS D) or 14,000 vehicle trips per day. The proposed application will add approximately 3,000 vehicle trips per day on Locust Grove Road. D. Current traffic counts indicate that Overland Road carries 11,422 vehicle trips per day (VTD). The planning threshold for Overland Road is 14, 000 VDT with its current configuration. When Overland Road is rebuilt to five lanes, the planning threshold for Overland Road will be 33,000 VTD. The proposed application will add approximately 6,000 vehicle trips per day on Overland Road, therefore the existing, plus project traffic exceeds the planning threshold of Overland Road with its current configuration. When Overland Road is rebuilt to five -lanes, the roadway will be adequate to accommodate the traffic generated from this site. E. The Eagle Road/Overland Road intersection operates at a Level of Service E/F threshold, and is listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The subject site's additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. The District has already initiated a project (to be started within the next few months) to provide additional turn lanes and make other capacity enhancements to improve the intersections' operating characteristics. The improvement plans have not been finalized but the anticipation is for a substantial increase in capacity. F. The Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection operates at a Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The subject site's additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. G. A traffic study was submitted for the Resolution Subdivision site development plan. The key findings of the traffic study include the following: • The proposed development is expected to generate 12,495 total daily vehicle trips. An estimated 3,045 trips are pass -by trips, leaving 9,430 new daily vehicle trips added to the adjacent roadway system. • The Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection currently operates at Level of Service (LOS) F. Because Meridian Road is a principal arterial, LOS E is acceptable under current District policy. The intersection exceeds the allowable Level of Service. • Under "existing plus project" traffic volumes (Year 2005), the Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection is expected to operate at Level of Service (LOS) F. The District has currently programmed a project to upgrade Overland Road to create additional capacity. The design and magnitude of the improvements have not yet been determined. Because Meridian Road is a principal arterial, LOS E is acceptable under current District policy. • The Locust Grove Road/Overland Road intersection currently operates at an overall Level of Service (LOS) A. The intersection is STOP controlled only on the two Locust Grove Road approaches. Left turns from northbound Locust Grove on to westbound Overland Road operate at an LOS F condition. If a traffic signal were constructed with the existing traffic volumes and roadway geometry, the intersection would operate at an overall LOS B. • Under the existing traffic volumes, Locust Grove Road operates at an arterial LOS of A with volume -to -capacity ratios of less than 0.35 during peak hour conditions. • The Year 2020 traffic forecast of 18,000 vehicles per day for Overland Road indicates the need to widen the roadway from two to five lanes. The widening is desirable from an operational and safety standpoint and is required within 500 feet of the Eagle Road intersection. • The Year 2020 traffic forecast of 8,700 vehicles per day for Locust Grove Road does not indicate the need to add capacity. • The forecast traffic volumes at the Locust Grove Road intersection with Overland Road justify a traffic signal under existing plus project traffic volumes. The applicant should be required to provide 25 -percent of the cost for the traffic signal, which is $37,500.00. The District will construct the traffic signal when it is warranted. • The site driveways on Overland Road are expected to have traffic volumes low enough that traffic signals are not needed. • The new public street intersection on Overland Road is expected to have traffic volumes that warrant a traffic signal. The applicant should be required to provide 75 -percent of the cost to construct the traffic signal, which is $112,500.00 (total cost is $150,000). The District will construct the traffic signal when it is warranted. • The site driveway intersections on Locust Grove Road are expected to have traffic volumes low enough that traffic signals are not needed, however, all the intersections on Locust Grove Road will require the construction of a center turn lane. • All the intersections on Overland Road will require the construction of a center turn lane. Due to the locations of the intersections and the taper lengths required for the turn lanes, the applicant would be required to add another traffic lane on Overland Road abutting the entire site. • The consultant was not aware of ACHD's project to widen the Overland Road/Eagle Road intersection when the TIS was performed. The Eagle Road/Overland Road intersection was identified to operate at Level of Service (LOS) F under existing and build out conditions. The District is adding turn -lanes at the intersection this fiscal year, which will improve the operations of the intersection to an adequate Level of Service D (LOS D). Overland Road is scheduled for reconstruction from two to five lanes in FY 2004. When the roadway is reconstructed to five lanes, the intersection will operate at an adequate Level of Service C (LOS Q. H. The applicant is proposing a stub street to the south property line located 1,000 -feet west of the east property line. District Staff supports the location of the stub street. The applicant should provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub street with a temporary easement provided to the District. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that; "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. I. The applicant is proposing a stub street to the east property line located 400 -feet south of Overland Road. District Staff supports the location of the stub street. The applicant should provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub street with a temporary easement provided to the District. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that; "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. J. The improvement of Overland Road abutting this development is included in the District's current Five Year Work Program District policy requires the applicant to provide a $52,800.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the parcel (approximately 2,640 -feet) prior to District approval of a final plat, whichever occurs first. K. The improvement of Locust Grove Road abutting this development is not included in the District's current Five Year Work Program. District policy requires the applicant to construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel prior to District approval of a final plat. The sidewalk should be located two feet within the new right-of-way of Locust Grove Road. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. L. The applicant is proposing two driveways on Locust Grove Road. The driveways are located as follows: ♦ The northern driveway is proposed to be located 440 -feet south of Overland Road. ♦ The southern driveway is proposed to be located 690 -feet south of Overland Road. Peacock Street intersects Locust Grove Road from the west approximately 550 -feet south of Overland Road and Labrador Street approximately 1,100 -feet south of Overland Road. District policy requires the applicant to locate driveways on Locust Grove Road a minimum of 440 -feet south of Overland Road and 220 -feet from the streets on the west side of Locust Grove Road. The applicant's proposed driveways do not meet the required offset from Peacock Street on the west side of Locust Grove Road. The applicant should be required to locate the northern driveway to align with Peacock Street to west, and the southern driveway should be located 75 - feet north of the south property line. The driveways should be constructed 30 to 35 -foot wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the roadway. The applicant should be required to provide 100 -feet of stacking for both the inbound and out -bound travel lanes for the driveway. Coordinate the design of the driveways with District staff. A The applicant is proposing three driveways on Overland Road. The driveways are located as follows: ♦ 480 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 930 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 1,280 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of stacking for this driveway. All the driveways align with existing driveways on the north side of the road, which meets District policy. The driveways should be constructed 30 to 35 -feet wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the existing roadway edge. N. The applicant is proposing to construct two public roads off Overland Road. The roads are proposed to be located: ♦ 320 -feet west of the east property line: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to locate driveways off this public street a minimum of 100 -feet south of Overland Road. The roadway should be constructed as a 40 -foot street section with curbs gutters and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58 -feet of right-of-way. ♦ 850 -feet west of the east property line: based on the submitted traffic study this roadway should be signalized and driveways on this roadway should be located a minimum of 175 -feet south of Overland Road and consecutive driveways should be required to align or offset a minimum of 150 -feet. The roadway should be constructed as a 46 -foot street section with curbs, gutters, and a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 64 -feet of right-of-way. This road should be signalized. The applicant should be required to construct a signal for the new intersection. Coordinate the design of the signalized intersection with District staff. The District should provide 25 -percent of the cost of the signal. ♦ The applicant is proposing an east/west road located 400 -feet south of Overland Road: the applicant should be required to locate driveways on the new roadway a minimum of 50 -feet from a public street intersection. The applicant is proposing Resolution Subdivision Nee 6 n a traffic circles within the roadway. The street section around the traffic circle should be constructed 29 -feet wide. A YIELD sign should be installed at all approaches into the islands and directional islands should be constructed in the street approaches to the traffic circles to guide motorists in the proper direction. The pedestrian crossings shall be located at the intersection to improve pedestrian/vehicular recognition and safety. Coordinate the traffic control plan and location of the pedestrian crossings with District staff. In order to provide safe turning movements into the driveways and streets on Overland Road and avoid a continuous meandering travel path a continuous turning lane is required from Locust Grove Road to the east property line. The design will provide turning movement at all driveways and streets through and including Locust Grove and new east -west street. O. ACHD's Park & Ride Division Staff have indicated the need for a park and ride location at the applicant's site. The District requests that applicant grant the District an easement for a 10 to 12 - space Park & Ride area at this site. Commuteride staff will contact the applicant to coordinate the location of the Park & Ride area. P. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that Tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Pat Nelson at 387-6160. Q. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, it is recommended that the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. R. A Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) is formed with a coordinator that works as a liaison between businesses and private and public transportation providers to increase the use of alternative transportation and other trip reduction measures (shuttle buses, bus pass programs, vanpools, carpools, bicycle and walking enhancements). An annual survey will be required of the TMA/TMO to monitor participation in alternative transportation programs and forwarded to the ACHD Commuteride Office. S. District policy states that direct access to arterials and collectors is normally restricted and that the developer shall try to use combined access points. In accordance with District policy the applicant should be required to provide a recorded cross access easement among the lots within the proposed subdivision for use to access the public streets prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits). T. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Locust Grove Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. Resolution Subdivision U. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Overland Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. V. Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with past action by the District the applicant should be required to pave all driveways their full width and at least 30 -feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Overland Road and Locust Grove Road and install pavement tapers with 15 -foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. W. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the undeveloped parcels abutting this site may be required upon review of a future application for this site. X. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, may be placed on future development of this parcel. Y. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the school parcel abutting this site should be extended upon review of a future application for this site. Z. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will require improvement in order to accommodate the additional traffic generated by this proposed development. The Overland Road/Meridian Road intersection currently operates at deficient Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of the 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The reconstruction of the intersection by the District is not listed in ACHD's Five year Work Program. The following Site Specific Requirements and Standard Requirements must be met or provided for prior to ACHD approval of the final plat: Special Recommendation to City of Meridian: 1. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Ms Pat Nelson at 387-6160. 2. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) should be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. 3. ACHD's Park & Ride Division Staff have indicated the need for a park and ride location at the applicant's site. The District requests that applicant grant the District an easement for a 10 to 12 -space Park & Ride area at this site. Commuteride staff will contact the applicant to coordinate the location of the Park & Ride area. Resolution Subdivision Page 8 4. The transportation system will require improvement in order to accommodate the additional traffic generated by additional development. The Overland Road/Meridian Road intersection currently operates at a deficient Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. Additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. The reconstruction of the Overland Road/Meridian Road Street intersection is not currently listed in ACHD's Five year Work Program. Site Specific Requirements: 1. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Overland Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #193. 2. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACRD Ordinance #193. 3. Provide a stub street to the south property line located 1,000 -feet west of the east property line. Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. 4. Provide a stub street to the east property line located 400 -feet south of Overland Road. Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. 5. Provide a $112,500.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for 75 -percent of the cost to construct a traffic signal on Overland Road for the new collector roadway. The District will construct the signal when it is warranted. 6. Provide a $37,500.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for 25 -percent of the cost of constructing a traffic signal at the Overland Road/Locust Grove Road intersection. The District will construct the signal when it is warranted. 7. Provide a $52,800.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the parcel (approximately 2,640 -feet) prior to District approval of a final plat, whichever occurs first. 8. Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel prior to District approval of a final plat. Locate the sidewalk two feet within the new right-of-way of Locust Grove Road. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. 9. Locate two driveways on Locust Grove Road as follows: ♦ The northern driveway shall be located 550 -feet south of Overland Road to align with Peacock Street to the west. ♦ The southern driveway shall be located 75 -feet north of the south property line. The driveways shall be constructed 30 to 35 -foot wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the roadway. Provide 100 -feet of stacking for both the inbound and out -bound travel lanes for the driveways. Coordinate the design of the driveways with District staff. 10. Locate three driveways on Overland Road as follows: ♦ 480 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 930 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 1,280 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 100 -feet of stacking for this driveway. The driveways shall be constructed 30 to 35 -feet wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the existing roadway edge. 11. Locate two public roads as follows: ♦ off Overland Road 320 -feet west of the east property line: locate driveways off this public street a minimum of 100 -feet south of Overland Road. The roadway shall be constructed as a 40 -foot street section with curbs gutters and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58 -feet of right-of-way. ♦ off Overland Road 850 -feet west of the east property line: driveways off this roadway shall be located a minimum of 175 -feet south of Overland Road and consecutive driveways are required to align or offset a minimum of 150 -feet. The roadway shall be constructed as a 46 -foot street section with curbs, gutters, and a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 64 -feet of right-of-way. The applicant shall be required to construct a signal for the roadway/Overland Road intersection. Coordinate the design of the signalized intersection with District staff. June 15, 2000 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 20, 2000 APPLICANT G.L. Voigt / Overland LLC ITEM NO. J REQUEST Findings - Preliminary Plat approval of 17 building lots and 2 other lots on 107.06 acres for proposed Resolution Business Park south of Overland Road and east of Locust Grove Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS See attached Findings Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meridian. 1't interoffice MEMORANDUM To: William G. Berg, Jr. JUN 15 2000 CITY OF INIERID.M From: Wm. F. Nichols Subject: Resolution Business Park By: Overland 16, L.L.C. and Joint School District No. 2, Owners, and G.L. Voigt Development, Applicant File: PP -00-006 Date: June 14, 2000 Will: Please find attached the original of the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT, pursuant to action of the Council at their June 6, 2000 meeting. The Findings will be on the Council's agenda for June 20, 2000 meeting. Please serve conformed copies of the Findings upon the Applicant and the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works and the City Attorney office, if Council approves the Findings. If you have any questions arise please advise. Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\Resolution Business Park AZ RZ CUP PP\Berg061400PP.Mem NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. on June 6, 2000, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of G.L. Voigt Development / Overland, LLC for preliminary plat approval of 107.06 acres in proposed L -O and C -G zones for 17 building lots and 2 other lots generally located at the NW quarter, Section 20, T.3N., R.1 E. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 15th day of May, 2000 PUBLISH May 19th and June 2"d, 2000 WILLIAM G. BERG, jK, 61TY-CLERK '1 P! g fP PP a�,1 'OR4 SEAL 11-% :11 -, ��„ AN POIN SUBDIVISION m rn i t_�S�— � jiNC SEC C11t.( 0 — «:.._ — — — —42 WAY UNE �— IIIIlIAIr� _ _ IIS.. IEEEEEEEII I�' !.•� � Igloos co RESOLUTION """ �"'�"'• "� _ _ SUBDIVISION an�eas PRELIMINARY 317E Pl — 911E •A• Do�1i hwE. snt('iaC a x O F a gg f 5R6 F i FA s,4 sq SR �F ■� '� CE L� q � �� g 11 H8 m s V > 's q q • Fo i ,1111..` �►�� _ ri.. Il�j -•-� 1 1 I yFAIN I ilk co RESOLUTION """ �"'�"'• "� _ _ SUBDIVISION an�eas PRELIMINARY 317E Pl — 911E •A• Do�1i hwE. snt('iaC a x O F a gg f 5R6 F i FA s,4 sq SR �F ■� '� CE L� q � �� g 11 H8 m s V > 's q q • Fo ** TX CONFIRMA,.,jN REPORT ** AS OF MAY 15 '06 1?:2? PAGE.01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD# STATUS 0? 05/15 1?:18 PUBLIC WORKS OF --S 04'04" 013 083 OK 08 05/15 1?:22 2088886854 EC --S 04'28" 013 093 OK _41 t LaV a ouvt �c tY'CCt Judy Peavey -Derr, President 318 East 37th Street uave isivens, vice rresioent Garden City, Idaho 63714-6499 Marlyss Meyer, Secretary Phone (208) 387-6100 Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Fax (208) 387-6391 Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner E-mail: tellus@achd.ada,id,us May 8, 2000 pCErVEI) TO: G. L. Voigt MAY 15 2000 G. L. Voigt, Overland L.L.C. & Joint School District No. 2 MY OF MERIDIAN P.O. Box 2044 Idaho Falls, ID 83403 FROM: Steve Arnold, Principal Development Analyst Planning & Development SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat: Resolution Business Park Locust Grove and Overland Roads On May 3, 2000, the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District (hereafter called "District") took action on the preliminary Plat as stated on the attached staff report. In order that the Final Plat may be considered by the District for acceptance, the Developer shall cause the following applicable standard conditions to be satisfied prior to District certification and endorsement: Drainage plans shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. 2. If public street im rov rn qujrgd: Prior to any construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way, the following shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. a. Three complete sets of detailed street construction drawings prepared by an Idaho registered professional Engineer. b. Execute and Inspection Agreement between the Developer and the District together with initial payment deposit for inspection and/or testing services. C. Complete all street improvements to the satisfaction of the District, or execute a Surety Agreement between the Developer and the District to guarantee the completion of the construction of all required street improvements. 3. Furnish a copy of the Final Plat showing street names as approved by the Local Government Agency having such authority together with the payment of fee charged for the manufacturing and installation of all street signs. MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING: APPLICANT : �` G ` �aC % AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: REQUEST: L AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: - CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA STREET NAME COMMITTE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: 1001 v fly, 10• ��jj G"f el �lt COMMENTS 14:20 MAY 09, 2000 TEL N0: (208) 387-6391 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT #2605 PAGE: 2/13 Fc"IvED MAY 0 9 2000 Planning and Development Division City of Meridian Development Application Report Citv7Clerk Off o, ^ M rV Preliminary Plat — Resolution Business Park 1 MAZ00-004/MCUP00-015/MCUP00-016/ MCUP00-017 Locust Grove Rd/Overland Road An application for a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City of Meridian for a 17 -lot residential and commercial subdivision on 107.06 -acres. The applicant is also requesting conditional use and rezone approval. The City has forwarded the application to ACHD for review and comment. The site is located at the southeast corner of Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. This development is estimated to generate 9,430 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic study. Roads impacted by this development: Locust Grove Road Overland Road ACHD Commission Date — May 3, 2000 - 12:00 p.m. Resolution Subdivision Page 1 MAY 09 '00 14:29 PAGE.02 14:21 MAY 09, 2000 TEL N0: (208) 387-6391 0-1 r� Facts and Findings: A. Generallnformation Owner — G.I. Voigt Applicant - Same R-4, RT - Existing zoning L -O, C -G - Requested zoning 107.06 - Acres 17 - Proposed lots 200 - Proposed multi -family dwelling units 346,000 - Square feet of proposed building 125,000 -square feet of Office building 145,000 -square feet of Retail building 57,000 -square feet of an Ice Rink 19,000 -square feet of Day Care Center Meridian High School 2,300 - Total lineal feet of proposed public streets 286 - Traffic Analysis Zone JAZ) West Ada - Impact Fee Service Area Meridian - Impact Fee Assessment District Locust Grove Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count 3,552 on 7-16-99 A -Existing Level of Service C -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 950 -feet of frontage 50 to 70 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) #2605 PAGE: 3/13 Locust Grove Road is improved with two lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. The segment of Locust Grove Road abutting the site is not listed in the current Five Year Work Program for reconstruction. Overland Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count 11,422 on 11-30-99 (west of Eagle Road) Traffic count 9,916 on 11-23-99 (west of Locust Grove Road) D -Existing Level of Service E -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 2,640 -feet of frontage 50 to 70 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Resolution Subdivision Page 2 MAY 09 '00 14:30 PAGE.03 14:21 MRY 09, 2000 TEL N0: (208) 387-6391 #2605 PRGE: 4/13 .-1 Overland Rod is improved with two lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. The segment of Overland Road abutting the site is listed in the current Five -Year Work Program for reconstruction to 5 -lane in FY (2004). _Blue Tick Street/Brandys Jewel Street Local streets with no bike lane designation No traffic count available 50 -feet of frontage 50 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 50 -feet required right-of-way for their extensions Blue Tick Street and Brandys Jewel Street are improved as 37 -foot street section with curb, gutter and sidewalk. B. On March 27, 2000, the District Planning and Development staff inspected this site and evaluated the transportation system in the vicinity. On March 31, 2000, the staff met as the District's Technical Review Committee and reviewed the impacts of this proposed development on the District's transportation system. The results of that analysis constitute the following Facts and Findings and recommended Site Specific Requirements. C. Locust Grove Road has 3,522 existing vehicle trips per day, which is a Level of Service A (LOS A). An acceptable Level of Service for this segment of roadway is D (LOS D) or 14,000 vehicle trips per day. The proposed application will add approximately 3,000 vehicle trips per day on Locust Grove Road. D. Current traffic counts indicate that Overland Road carries 11,422 vehicle trips per day (VTD). The planning threshold for Overland Road is 14, 000 VDT with its current configuration. When Overland Road is rebuilt to five lanes, the planning threshold for Overland Road will be 33,000 VTD. The proposed application will add approximately 6,000 vehicle trips per day on Overland Road, therefore the existing, plus project traffic exceeds the planning threshold of Overland Road with its current configuration. When Overland Road is rebuilt to five -lanes, the roadway will be adequate to accommodate the traffic generated from this site. E. The Eagle Road/Overland Road intersection operates at a Level of Service E/F threshold, and is listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The subject site's additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. The District has already initiated a project (to be started within the next few months) to provide additional turn lanes and make other capacity enhancements to improve the intersections' operating characteristics. The improvement plans have not been finalized but the anticipation is for a substantial increase in capacity. F. The Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection operates at a Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The subject site's additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. G. A traffic study was submitted for the Resolution Subdivision site development plan. The key findings of the traffic study include the following: Resolution Subdivision Page 3 MAY 09 '00 14:31 PArF_R4 14:24 MAY 09, 2000 TEL N0: (208) 387-6391 #2605 PAGE 7113 provide 100 -feet of stacking for both the inbound and out -bound travel lanes for the driveway. Coordinate the design of the driveways with District staff. M. The applicant is proposing three driveways on Overland Road. The driveways are located as follows: ♦ 480 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 930 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 1,280 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of stacking for this driveway. All the driveways align with existing driveways on the north side of the road, which meets District policy. The driveways should be constructed 30 to 35 -feet wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the existing roadway edge. N. The applicant is proposing to construct two public roads off Overland Road. The roads are proposed to be located: ♦ 320 -feet west of the east property line: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to locate driveways off this public street a minimum of 100 -feet south of Overland Road. The roadway should be constructed as a 40 - foot street section with curbs gutters and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58 -feet of right-of-way. ♦ 850 -feet west of the east property line: based on the submitted traffic study this roadway should be signalized and driveways on this roadway should be located a minimum of 175 -feet south of Overland Road and consecutive driveways should be required to align or offset a minimum of 150 -feet. The roadway should be constructed as a 46 -foot street section with curbs, gutters, and a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 64 -feet of right-of-way. This road should be signalized. The applicant should be required to construct a signal for the new intersection. Coordinate the design of the signalized intersection with District staff. The District should provide 25 -percent of the cost of the signal. ♦ The applicant is proposing an east/west road located 400 -feet south of Overland Road: the applicant should be required to locate driveways on the new roadway a minimum of 50 -feet from a public street intersection. The applicant is proposing a traffic circles within the roadway. The street section around the traffic circle should be constructed 29 -feet wide. A YIELD sign should be installed at all approaches into the islands and directional islands should be constructed in the street approaches to the traffic circles to guide motorists in the proper direction. The pedestrian crossings shall be located at the intersection to improve pedestrian/vehicular recognition and safety. Coordinate the traffic control plan and location of the pedestrian crossings with District staff. Resolution Subdivision Page 6 MAY 09 '00 14:33 PAr,F A� 14:25 MAY 09, 2000 TEL N0: (208) 387-6391 #2605 PAGE 813 In order to provide safe turning movements into the driveways and streets on Overland Road and avoid a continuous meandering travel path a continuous turning lane is required from Locust Grove Road to the east property line. The design will provide turning movement at all driveways and streets through and including Locust Grove and new east -west street. O. ACHD's Park & Ride Division Staff have indicated the need for a park and ride location at the applicant's site. The District requests that applicant grant the District an easement for a 10 to 12 - space Park & Ride area at this site. Commuteride staff will contact the applicant to coordinate the location of the Park & Ride area. P. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that Tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Pat Nelson at 387-6160. Q. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, it is recommended that the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. R. A Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) is formed with a coordinator that works as a liaison between businesses and private and public transportation providers to increase the use of alternative transportation and other trip reduction measures (shuttle buses, bus pass programs, vanpools, carpools, bicycle and walking enhancements). An annual survey will be required of the TMA/TMO to monitor participation in alternative transportation programs and forwarded to the ACHD Commuteride Office. S. District policy states that direct access to arterials and collectors is normally restricted and that the developer shall try to use combined access points. In accordance with District policy the applicant should be required to provide a recorded cross access easement among the lots within the proposed subdivision for use to access the public streets prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits). T. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Locust Grove Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. U. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Overland Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. V. Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with past action by the District the applicant should be required to pave all driveways their full width and at least 30 -feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Overland Road and Locust Grove Road and install pavement tapers with 15 -foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. W. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the undeveloped parcels abutting this site may be required upon review of a future application for this site. Resolution Subdivision Page 7 MAY 09 '00 14:34 PQrp no 14:25 MAY 09, 2000 TEL NO: (208) 387-6391 #2605 PAGE: 9'13 011111 �-. X. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, may be placed on future development of this parcel. Y. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the school parcel abutting this site should be extended upon review of a future application for this site. Z. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will require improvement in order to accommodate the additional traffic generated by this proposed development. The Overland Road/Meridian Road intersection currently operates at deficient Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of the 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The reconstruction of the intersection by the District is not listed in ACHD's Five year Work Program. The following Site Specific Requirements and Standard Requirements must be met or provided for prior to ACHD approval of the final plat: Special Recommendation to City of Meridian: In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Ms Pat Nelson at 387-6160. 2. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) should be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. 3. ACHD's Park & Ride Division Staff have indicated the need for a park and ride location at the applicant's site. The District requests that applicant grant the District an easement for a 10 to 12 -space Park & Ride area at this site. Commuteride staff will contact the applicant to coordinate the location of the Park & Ride area. 4. The transportation system will require improvement in order to accommodate the additional traffic generated by additional development. The Overland Road/Meridian Road intersection currently operates at a deficient Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. Additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. The reconstruction of the Overland Road/Meridian Road Street intersection is not currently listed in ACHD's Five year Work Program. Resolution Subdivision Page 8 MAY 09 '00 14:35 14:26 MRY 09, 2000 Site Specific Requirements: TEL N0: (206) 387-6391 #2605 PAGE: 10/13 Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Overland Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance 9193. 2. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #193. Provide a stub street to the south property line located 1,000 -feet west of the east property line. Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. 4. Provide a stub street to the east property line located 400 -feet south of Overland Road. Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. Provide a $112,500.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for 75 -percent of the cost to construct a traffic signal on Overland Road for the new collector roadway. The District will construct the signal when it is warranted. 6. Provide a $37,500.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for 25 -percent of the cost of constructing a traffic signal at the Overland Road/Locust Grove Road intersection. The District will construct the signal when it is warranted. 7. Provide a $52,800.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the parcel (approximately 2,640 -feet) prior to District approval of a final plat, whichever occurs first. 8. Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel prior to District approval of a final plat. Locate the sidewalk two feet within the new right-of-way of Locust Grove Road. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. Resolution Subdivision Page 9 MAY 09 '00 14:36 PAGE.10 14:27 MAY 09, 2000 TEL N0: (208) 387-6391 #2605 PAGE: 11/13 9. Locate two driveways on Locust Grove Road as follows: ♦ The northern driveway shall be located 550 -feet south of Overland Road to align with Peacock Street to the west. ♦ The southern driveway shall be located 75 -feet north of the south property line. The driveways shall be constructed 30 to 35 -foot wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the roadway. Provide 100 -feet of stacking for both the inbound and out -bound travel lanes for the driveways. Coordinate the design of the driveways with District staff. 10. Locate three driveways on Overland Road as follows: ♦ 480 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 930 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 1,280 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 100 -feet of stacking for this driveway. The driveways shall be constructed 30 to 35 -feet wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the existing roadway edge. 11. Locate two public roads as follows: ♦ off Overland Road 320 -feet west of the east property line: locate driveways off this public street a minimum of 100 -feet south of Overland Road. The roadway shall be constructed as a 40 -foot street section with curbs gutters and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58 -feet of right-of-way. ♦ off Overland Road 850 -feet west of the east property line: driveways off this roadway shall be located a minimum of 175 -feet south of Overland Road and consecutive driveways are required to align or offset a minimum of 150 -feet. The roadway shall be constructed as a 46 -foot street section with curbs, gutters, and a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 64 -feet of right-of-way. The applicant shall be required to construct a signal for the roadway/Overland Road intersection. Coordinate the design of the signalized intersection with District staff. 12. Locate an east/west road 400 -feet south of Overland Road: locate driveways on the east/west roadway a minimum of 50 -feet from a public street intersection. The traffic circle within the roadway shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 29 -feet wide street section around the traffic circle. A YIELD sign shall be installed at all approaches into the island and a directional island shall be constructed in the street approaches to the traffic circle to guide motorists in the proper direction. The pedestrian crossings shall be located at the intersection to improve pedestrian/vehicular recognition and safety. Coordinate the design of the buffer circle, the traffic control plan and location of the pedestrian crossings with District staff. 13. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, shall be placed on future development of this parcel. Resolution Subdivision Page 10 MAY 09 '00 14:36 PAGE.11 14:26 MAY 09, 2000 TEL N0: (208) 387-6391 #2605 PAGE: 12/13 14. Construct a center turn lane on Overland Road abutting the entire site. 15. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the school parcel abutting this site should be extended upon review of a future application for this site. 16. Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Overland Road and Locust Grove Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. Standard Requirements: A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity. The written request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for ACHD Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its original decision. The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 5. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. Resolution Subdivision Page 11 MAY 09 '00 14:37 PAGE.12 14:28 MAY 09, 2000 TEL N0: (208) 387-6391 #2605 PAGE: 13/13 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACRD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 8. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 9. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusion of Law: ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development Division at 387-6170. Submitted by: Planning and Development Staff Commission Action: May 3, 2000 Resolution Subdivision Page 12 MAY 09 '00 14:38 PAGE.13 oz 12 y O rA I (IQ zr / J z O ■, . �. p. C. QTQ CE V C� Mme• / O "C o . 1 c • ow �\ lr'Y v� p 0 �• = V� ,moo '\ V ` ` !� FF�•.��� • H • IQ rA Op C v`, 1 QQ O f7 m &A A m. �M A o Wt� O w a o o o CD ro 41 Q+ Ow o oz 12 y O t" f!1 A w N 0.- O 5 �1 0 n, z a M F, y O a r O rA fD � A CA C. QM "I tD A c �•rA.. Cr arca• � d+ e0oa�`'d� fD •� m �, D rA A O � ZArA O 0 0 o rls v o o' a�?orA .a� m M A7 "rT' ow d Po ar�a3c... • sy � nos ""'r ►�. A tRD rA .-• A7d IQ Ow G � O y 0 �+ �+ �•+ r-+ r r �D 00 J C1 V1 •P W N �-` d C"'' � � ,� ■p O � V1 A W N i-+ O t A � � •0 � � �' rD rA A S zz A `fl fD fr" ►s � A � O A• p,,; G. QC• m a." rA oo pod, rA to r� O .� rr• iy O rA h ao.A„fD 3 CD C�o�1 � D C -1ZA O� � � \� � V � �� ', +-� � � � � .per• � � 0cr 01% � C� 57 rA y O .-+ r.+ I-+ N r-+ r. to .. W N r-+ O =� I vJ � c� r c� i --- *-o-�I.- *-►��000�c�ur,.AwN�C.0-+e w o A: a `J `v r 0 tA TQ TQ QM arpQ s p 1w rA ow �'�►C Q Qro( ntz �� O QQ 0 rA p 27 A rD 04- o o o i {� p�rA CL eD ' ry a p o arQ O o A: A� � • Sy A A � ►•� Vn ffDD O p ,f D� O c a FD ►� J= eD A C fD f Z7GR+� �o aeD eD D S D O CCA a O A ow IQ is V 3�V y O ►••► �, ►-r r-+ 0- i-•► �.o w J� C" C C 0 M n m V1 46 W Ni.- O fD O m 0 ra "'O O 0 7D m o n c �• a s �• b rrA fD ►! 0 a E4. rb Nom' "r rC..CD r% fD CD C3 �r'C �- Ca r Cj' n y 0 ZA Deo \ Cr p � � �, � �• c�0� o, nWw p �. y o 40 Vow 0 Q n ��- C� �' n p C o n fTQ D fD ow 00 C n O O p b fD ry CLQ f9 "n"• n! gr n `�CTCLp.��,aC rnn n ow Q n n• rn 'ZS E n Citi � CL o n c, � o ow o j p rD fD p ep 'U d C. Z, O UQ m ow .,!. 0 W � a• p TJ � O � � �• � C ri TQ n rD ri v O p c►� � "S a aCD o, W. rD or a p rb eD c ss r., �• ae, p. A (IQ O O CD -1 p a Q 0- zw Wt 0, = m: M a'=, ►z ml A� O 01 pfD �.. a �o y y M `D w -1 C1 to 4.0. W y O � �" V1 A W N �-+ Q. �\ rp O rD p ►p "C O v� \ fD C P4. �• y !z r, A ^. "! rA. �., i� ,n� y ""• v rpft d n m �• O G rA `e a = fv or eD ;IN n O O r �� e fD � �. �• �. aro G, � � � 22 ~ ``l, LU O• oo � eD oQjn lKietTQ oQo`•��• CM QtQ 31 �. n o eD m r° < o "" a. a n }a � IQe a i � �c-� 6 -Z -4) ���-►��►��000-4o�cn4�1.0 �a � m m FA rA Ow aria a. NJ r. C� Ow rA ►! C� A A C � "Ci i? 1 ;=` r` < ,�� p, � � arQ• f DSD.! o �. a0 Ow Ow= w-- O. N a arQ o a » i-►, O fD fD � \'LA 1T\�O.�n M RrCS O 'O qt - J` S I ti J J TQ O �• fRD _O O A. fD » M ^ IQ y O VI •P W N �~-► C �D 00 J C1 IA •A. W N �-+ C C s, c o W A a "Y t.,! TQ C fD fD crV aCL �•� to eb a pp,,, fb s S rr� CL to da "A's m TQ fD cc l A S C A" C p• D p p O Q COQ 'A to � ,ono �1 05 to m �''\ �` A a • a v4 c to o bd fi X o C a rA IQ o c Ato M 0. A ►� C �.%� ` C Gr m � �q• � � C C. to. p. n'ap.toNO p. JJi Owl 'C TQ OW to eb to rA TQ fD VI 40h, W N *+ O R�? ZVI y O Z R�? ZVI y O y y ti cn U C' M--► ►-► �O 00 J O� VI 4h, W N e= �J 3 qq y O 5 �- *- *- �- y- 0.- �o w --4 n a� w N � o � � � w C �i IQ l Y 1WfD Icy 11��• �. v R �� 1L`, \ ►`'� "►� D C „AT Q9' CCD �eDto sy CL o R o o O QM 00 amCrQ C v � "'C rD a, O C � A7• � �• c a a. MOW o mz r eD "a cC D W.- 411 p. ,, p e� "a vi rter�. am} _ft CD rA ✓ U � � `� �n ^i -`�` A7 t,' � A7 :=• rA rA w r ai 0-1 V1 ~p W N �~-► p �O 00 �1 C� V1 W N i--� o -1,, O CL CL ts lz ir A CL A �' A T o LA i cr CL Szl�st z<fD fD MD fD Lp i v , To "! Qq O -1 A tC RDc. r.��I'D ID .�' yid A C 00. rA jV tD C r fD � `� �, J \ , � A � Cr � O PAD � A7• rA Ow p �1J .� ; "j c or c b A wt rA IN Ci" �' tib �• � t e' �p �. ►cam C A �7Q t'D C Ii y y y O VI 4�6 W N *- p m C DAA tD `t fD fD TQ �IrD fl,,co o O�arc � 04, o 04' ei cr a to E. r arD o'er, IrD n A 'g - CD fD `r C � A. v� �h ►.. J� fD eD MeD a r'(A ao co fD A '��1 A in A7• A rD Q; A "Y C rj n fD eD A; n fD�. fD rL (D fDW m O fD y 0 *+46 h-► i-+ ►-+ f-+ �p 00 J 01 VI .p W N �•► �O A r* t� D' a ' VI .A WO , ` � � � < eC 0R• C A CD 4:2- QTQ ft S c c 52' c a rA f° rAs aye nrAof r G v a s EACL 0 A c• x v D o •-r CCD Q G.IQ �\ f D a =w A < rD p C1 c A.R•DO,,� Com. �'o �- rYCL O O Q < 54 ►� o� Fes' 8 s, y O 4, S acteb CD c . a �. (FQ. w oCS o Oar�Q A G ►+� A a cr fD Ow � o eD O OQ O 'n At,;E Q C 2ow• meD eb a 0 0 027 Ao' � � eD rA eD A � A fD A7 ►A... � < � � �• CSD r`rZ eC eD ZA n A `"%, (IQ "! fD ~ eD rY A S 4 W N O � D--A � O 3 "`e as o B a C A A f�aD s � � o � p G � � �•� � fD ara � Co d ; c. �e �. �o a• y m r rr. � r�r �! � i� � ►""• e p I� LL. G UQ o 0 o C �.- \ Cr a C O 9. "o CD cr o COta� � 0 owo c. \^ a rQ o n �• 1 1 O °h v4 G t n rn ow xv Ts, eD A (� rA e A� CAD C. eD ivrA 3=• eD Y �C rA n '.Y. TCD fDQ O-+ i"'' F-+ �-+ F-+ r-► �O 00 J O� VI J� W N �-► p A C' O � ... 7Q C fD fD �i fD ow `3' fD a" p G CL Cr � � C � ri rC c g. p C. O fD tv I�, fD o ao o'O (IQ CL O M riga.=R&ODcr ��� C� 1 �Q ' Y am -f O Q+ • CD "%CL 7Q o fD `e fD C i �-► fD CL fD ft ft 'A a � a f<D C 'A O A "'C eD FD CD rn \ o s,aro C z. ° arQ o a' 3 a CD ft n CD 7Q , yy.loll., CD IrD I ml �. sp y 0 CD CD CLm m ~ CD n O ~� A � w fD cm a fD Q" o � . OD a c.� Q, o Oar�a CL oW CD m eD.a�a'"o oa `o.cm�. a, gt ow � e ow.. b �. ID CD 0 �. c-aeCDeD CD o o c a =�op' Xco . fD CD ae F* (A ow AD O n� eDD m 6arA "C fD CCD O n O C R� fD n. eD IS y O N-" )'" 0" *" M " i-+ "o M �i to -A W N M-+ O y O pEra, a �a pw A d � A O O A r.►, � r. n ow p feD D f�D C G. `<ft � rte • '� cc.aCD�fDa.a�o�ox IM o R CD rn ol o � ml f=DCD c cram oa"-c �. `C 06 � fD tD C i ��-► LU ri ��• A n r•r rA a 04 _r11 � A A• C� b fAD � f�D e•r C/� C i.r 'Y n fD wl AD �, y C � A� �• f�D ,C cC fD '`7' A A � CZ+ A• � A� D 0 �• A � a' fD n arQ A� A `l A O v fD CD y O J 01 to 46 W N �-+ G A r* O w !n" G+ r* vl n .t Irl Y..& V u u u u kw — — ., _ _ . . _ F••► .iii I!v O i t go *A Z, W k J 6-` In""p 00 J Q\ V1 .G W N v 111's Q. CL� .—.. r-• rD A C b A o p �• a� va wl CL p A p fD ►*o C� O, ol wl Ow ' R' C. `e o cc A fp ffl � � G R �• � CL M O co� cww A O �•� a, �yara•f°� Oma,, M b A r O C ' C mw. cr C " a. p. rA G D A Cr OftCD FA ra Ow ti G `C rp eD v fD �-t ~ rrA a M n or TA o � V1 W N i~+ O 00 �l O� V1 W N �-► C. A �, C `� �' L R ty p� !D UQ O p• �c eD r� ��.eDar��oR� �w►�e �d� S � -� tot�bA o rR � � 00, off" t' -f `� ""• ,�,r G to TQ ow eD �ar~Rcr c•� a CL A A A R p CD AIIQ A C m O =, c CD ^r A sZ, A• A 0 Q Coln CL �• arc A fD �' p rn rl R � re rAfD V v v J %S A M 1 A rA L fD rA m fD � D A••0'Q *"�-`�-•`�-" *-A *" �o w -4 CIA VI .A W N �-" O 4 I I- l, L- t L-) ki Y W NCL ?Z9��Q` Ao � a \ \ A b�, rA r., a. �• G TQ TQ A C� w l CL eD �`�►.ro i ki Y W NCL Ao � a ,s b�, rA r., a. �• y ` TQ TQ A C� w f�D CL eD �`�►.ro 14 y N a CDa to CA CA c, n o I - a00 m Z. 1 M• CL CL ow oro• � *I wo oma. � ora � � ,.� �, � `� o �".'t• O cn aCD rD O wr. mo n C "U rAril n `ti fD ora o A9 �• A � � �s v. � C CC EA r0� r�ji CL rA y 0 y O VI L W N i.+ D h 0 r" ►.� fD C ce �• C A A co o is D O A Cr Aow C. O a"O��C �Q• ` W •,! O fD C rA `d CL CL fD ) �� A ��~•�.� D 1. D m°' :0 D it aria• � j C✓ m �r cOft A yCDeD CL h 0 N ;0arEg4.0 eD mw CFQ co o is D O A Cr Aow C. O a"O��C N co ` W •,! O fD C rA `d fD ) �� A ��~•�.� 1. y 0 Cil ,A W N ).-�p J O\ Cil A W N �-► d �, O Wd C. Gni Ail V- y O CL B n = Q CLV `e a � c �. co�aa a b4 0Qow ow "t o Pyr r. CL m ��'b oar a.a•� ,orow o.d v� �TQ C OCQ o o 0 .. � C A� (IQ �D b tD o C p �' ►.5 re.. O ow 0 �TQ 0 �. A, � ►n 0; IQ `Ar. q -j. O r. `C � n cs y O �1" S- y O Z 0-1 0', �,-, w-+ �-► �-+ �O oo J O� V1 W N �-+ a r+ < C sn A is ria VII ma I \ G !* is m �„0 °rarroarc D, rA IQ �` V ;\ n � d yid ��. �' ►*� �. G� c C.L. -44 arcIQ rA 01) cr IS- lk— oq• b rD ty � � �• Uo fD L b �2ZiY ap a� a �c y O w-+ 1- �E" �." �m" �- �o w J O-, Vl (A 46 W N I-+ Cl- - O b � o� A �(IQ� `5 r: Q y' A R � tD O a R 14. o• R, Q o CFq C a �+ A o o p' W� rA Pill CD o R R 0 0 Q C ft M0. °rte Ow �o �-+ �-► F--+ �+ �o W -1 O., cn .rte W N C., r C C W 'A n p V� W N O fD p fD p 0 b O w rA ea CL am ro (� a 4�-r A7 p' A� �• fD fD �y i� to 71 i C ' O A=, 2D CL f4 D n a O a srA 0+ mw ow 01 ow C C� co '-,IC. o oro o o' 0 CL fD TQrr rD �' Cry „C ffD �pfD "•rte �' : D 46 m v. to V fD UQ C.to C•� p ► l C. w p fnD tC CL O y O o- �- �-+ f- o-+ *- �.O V1 46 W W i-+ O -1 C1 to r y O � )'-► h-+ i-+ 0.+ *+ �O 00 v O� CJI �. W N F•-� � C fD D "C b O i? CJI W N �-•� p C rA ?. � . (�•, .1 �.... \ {gyp{ y.�l � Ir Vl � IAr. � �r A ', � A .-\ to y ►� .. �' A• fD rr RCD fD vi b A7 C3 < A C p O w fD Ch v�� O �l,' ems• r. �Ci r� C14 712 ts 3 \. h R � � Ni v C F.� �%Q �, �• A tD C Gr TQ 0 LA m QTQ v' fD fDyft R"4 D `rt /�+ �• A A IQr rA f, d � � o y y CJI � Mu s, y O Ll F.-' �-i *A F..' *--' to -9�. W N i-+ O tV r PEW r` E y y o. C a A M Cr `r'p IQ D R� �•CD p p ar Q p a A b t� �e c. eD o s arow o ml W ml CD O ark o•O, �aaa�pe0�°� ~ � A p ,5. � c � pr C, �,, � o CL ow �• .� fD TQ o; fD arar�r�ac°"W p. R, p b i C p ow ar � o E y y �- i- r-•+ h- F-+ �--+ �p = to p. W N �+ O ow ara �O d amw wCL o °`�ara•�'� CL `t �' d G � � O p• r� O owCLoO�0 �c a �. p CL Ml 0P mo r-. � :r. .`L O O ow a �o MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING — APRIL 11 2000 The regular scheduled meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Keith Borup. MEMBERS PRESENT: Keith Borup, Sally Norton, Kent Brown, Tom Barbeiro, Richard Hatcher. OTHERS PRESENT: David Swartley, Bruce Freckleton, Brad Hawkins Clark, Christie Richardson, Ray Voss, Will Berg. Borup: Good evening ladies and gentlemen. We'd like to begin the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting regular scheduled meeting for Tuesday April 11th. First item is minutes from the March 14th meeting. Any comments, questions, additions on the minutes. Does that mean no. Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman I wish to make a motion that we approve the minutes from the March 14th meeting as submitted. Norton: I second. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: 3 AYES, 1 ABSTAIN Borup: Item number 1 and 2 is tabled from the previous meeting. Items 3,4,5,6 are continued public hearings all on the same project. I'd like to hear a staff report first on the status. We continued awaiting the ACHD report, which we have not received. Brad have you got some update on that. Hawkins Clark: Yes Commission Borup and Commissioner's, the first two items as you know, you closed the public hearings. The others, particularly the plat, was continued for the purpose of receiving the Ada County Highway District report. Our department spoke with Ada County Highway District this afternoon and they have requested that, number one, the packet that you received that had the draft ACHD staff report be omitted and not entered into the record. There was some mistakes and confusion on that. Number two, the date for the resolution ACHD commission meeting was set for tomorrow night. That has been moved off of tomorrow nights agenda. There has not been a new date set. They are in the process, I understand, of working with the developer on several major issues related to the road widening and other issues of dedication and such. Those discussions are happening with ACHD staff and the developer and a revised report has not been submitted for your consideration. Borup: Thank you. Any questions from the Commissioner's. Brad, do you know whether the developers representative is here tonight. Meridian Planning and 7—ing Commission Meeting — April 11, 2000 Page 2 Hawkins Clark: I believe Becky Bowcutt from Briggs Engineering did call. I did not speak with her but she did call and state she was not coming. There may be someone else present. I don't know. Borup: Before we open the hearing, is there any one here representing the application? Thank you. Commissioner's in light of the fact that these were continued for a specific purpose, receiving the ACHD report, is there any motion you'd like to make. I think we could deal with all six items probably in one motion. Norton: Mr. Commissioner. Does staff know when we'd get a ACHD report. Hawkins Clark: We do not. Norton: Mr. Chairman, can we state a meeting date which we could continue this. Borup: If we continue, it would need to be to a date certain. Hatcher: Are there standard scheduled meetings now. Borup: Not yet. I don't think—we won't have anything from ACHD in 2 weeks any way. Hatcher: I make a motion then that we take the first six items on our agenda and continue them until our regularly scheduled meeting which would be May 9th Barbeiro: I'll second the motion. Borup: Motion and second to continue items 1 through 6 for May 9th meeting. Any discussion. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: 3 AYES, 1 ABSTAIN Borup: All right, nine minutes after and we've gone through 6 items. Norton: Would it be possible to move number 15 up next as the applicant had submitted a letter. Borup: I think the applicants letter was submitted concerned that it might be bumped from the agenda, was my understanding. I think out of fairness to the other applicants maybe lets at least take the next two and then and then discuss that. That sound all right. Meridian Planning and %.ing Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 Page 3 Berg: Mr. Chairman and members of the Commission, the concern about moving items different from what the agenda, we as an agency we publish our agenda and people get in their heads trying to figure out a time they need to be there, so we just got to be a little bit of leery of moving them too far without the public trying to out guess the time frame. I try to discourage to out guess what the decisions of the commission might be but they still try to do that. I think it is a good idea to maybe to try to not push some things real early if they are late on the agenda unless we can get that notice out a little bit earlier to the public. Borup: I think we make sure the items heard tonight one way or the other without going all night. Brown: Just for the audience to understand, I'd like to make a statement about what our purpose is here. We are a voluntary body. We are not elected. We are just citizens like yourselves. Hopefully that will bring a few more smiles then what I see out there tonight. We are just residents of the City of Meridian and the area of impact, just like you are. We volunteer our time to come down here and make recommendations to the City Council. Our decisions are only recommendations to the Council. They are the decision making body. We spend time reading the reports and weighing the information and hopefully that will make us a little more happy in this meeting. I understand that everybody has their own kingdoms in which they live and hopefully we can do the best for the City of Meridian. Thank you. 7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RV SALES, RV RETAIL AND REPAIR ZONED I -L BY MAPLE GROVE R.V.-2490 W. FRANKLIN ROAD: Borup: Brad, have you got anything additional. I think we received a revised plat which is what we requested from last time. Hawkins Clark: Yes Commissioner. Not a plat but a site plan should have been received right. This was continued from the April 3rd meeting. It is my understanding for two reasons. One was to obtain a revised plan per the staff recommendations and then the second was for the variance application regarding the paving. There was—you should have in your packets a March 27 letter from our fire Marshall and Chief, Skip Voss and Kenny Bowers dated March 27 regarding this project as well as an April 6th letter from Matthew Dugan. Just for the benefit of the audience the cross hatched on the screen is the property subject property. The revised plan dated April 6th which you should have, does address most of the staff comments that we had. They are providing a 30 foot landscape setback instead of the 35, but giving the situation of the building on Franklin and here is the—actually we do not have the revised site plan available for you on the slide. It was not provided in 8-1/2 by 11 so apologies for that. The fencing, they are providing solid wood only in the rear storage area. Staffs initial aim on that was to see fencing on the site, but that would be a commission decision as to whether or not Meridian Planning and Zor "I Commission Special Meeting March 22, 2000 Page 9 3. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF 107.06 ACRES LO AND CG ZONING FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC—OVERLAND AND LOCUST GROVE ROADS.- Hawkins OADS: Hawkins Clark: Commissioner's this application does incorporate the high school site to the south. This is the only one of the six applications tonight that does incorporate this area. This was done at the request of the City. This was originally an illegal split. The city requested that the developer's incorporate the high school, Meridian School District, into this preliminary plat application and they have stated that they do not either support nor oppose the proposed development. The school district is simply willing to be incorporated into this preliminary plat application. In order to formalize the division of land here, this 107 acres, we do ask that our comments that are dated March 20, be incorporated. I'd like to go through about 4 of those points. The applicant has given a response to those. I would highlight number 8, which is on page 6 has to do with the easements which are located they are currently here along the north portion of the project along Overland Road and along the south, typically on plats. The city has requested that landscape buffers that are along arterial be incorporated separate legal lots and the applicant has stated they would prefer those to be easements. Staff don't have a problem with that. Our main concern is consistency of design and landscaping maintenance in the future. In terms of that, we would be willing if the commission would want to modify that and have those easements just along Overland and Locust Grove landscape buffers. Overland Road is 35 feet wide landscape buffer. Locust Grove is 25 feet. Condition number 10 pertains to the fencing in the project and the applicant is proposing to construct a fence along the east boundary of the Hunter. Again, staff has recommending that Hunter be piped. They had proposed in their plat that that be left over. There (inaudible) say that they concur with that and we would also concur with their comment that the fence they are stating they would prefer to have a fence along the boundary of that lateral in terms of the apartments. Our main point was as long as there is some kind of cross connection there between the sites. Some kind of good neighbor fence, preferably not a chain link. We would concur that if a fence if inter- connection is provided is find in terms of that west boundary on the apartment complex. Then, Item number 11 1 think we are in agreement there. There in terms of getting some kind of cross connection here as the plat currently does not propose any connection between this area, which is the proposed apartment complex and this 16 acre piece. How that happens, where it happens we would leave up to the applicant. Item number 13 deals with the private road. Here is the proposed private road off of Overland, which would service this lot number 6 and then lot number 8 simply coming down and making an "L" shaped. If it is only intended as a private drive which is stated in their response to our written comments, basically just to provide some kind of access, private access between these two future lot owners whoever the users are. This could potentially be as traffic moves easterly this will be the first entrance and if it is to be private, staff just simply have some concern as to whether this would become sort of the primary entrance into the site and don't really have an answer but maybe some kind of knuckle turn around instead of having that access directly onto Overland. Just cut that off and buffer it across there. That is it on the preliminary plat application. Meridian Planning and Zo ` g Commission Special Meeting March 22, 2000 Page 10 Borup: Any questions for Brad? Norton: Brad, I have two questions. Back to your number 10 regarding tiling the Hunter Lateral. In other words the applicant agrees to the the Hunter Lateral and provide a neighborly fence by the apartment buildings. Is that correct? Hawkins Clark: Correct. Norton: Then my next question is number 11, the suggestion of the cross access road. What was the applicants response or did they respond to number 11. Hawkins Clark: They did. If I can read it for you if you didn't receive. It states a vehicular connection between site A and B could be accomplished from the driveway between building 7 and 8. So they are kind of combining applications here. Building 7 and 8 —here is the next project but so just so you'll see what we are talking about. I believe they are referring to this northern area here. Here is building 7 so it would be essential be coming in off —the connection which they are saying would be on the south here. It would be coming across through there. Here is the Hunter right here and in order to get some kind of connection here, the proposed daycare is here. Norton: So they are agreeable for the cross traffic then. Hawkins Clark: I would point out they say could be accomplished. They have not out right agreed in their response. Barbeiro: Brad could you go back to the plat that we had before showing the school district site. Incorporating the school district into this plat, will have the school district site currently as an R-4. Then the school district would come back later to change the zoning on that. Hawkins Clark: High schools are permitted in an R-4. Barbeiro: I did not read it as tiling the lateral. I though that was going to remain open. Staffs recommendation not the way we had it originally. Okay, that's why I was confused. Hawkins Clark: It is city ordinance. It would have to be waived by the City Council if they were to leave it open. Borup: The applicant like to come forward. Bowcutt: Becky Bowcutt, Briggs Engineering. END OF SIDE ONE Meridian Planning and Zc g Commission Special Meeting March 22, 2000 Page 11 Bowcutt: Just for the benefit of the residents that are here, this application is that plat which we are asking to basically subdivide the property or cut it up into those lots shown. This does not approve any particular use on the property. This is just a plat. As Brad indicated, when we came before the City with pre -application conference Miss Stiles asked that we include the school district's lot as part of this plat. She has some concerns because it does not have frontage on Overland Road. It has an easement out to Overland road but no frontage. We talked to the school district. At first they were opposed then we stated it would be of no cost to you. We will put it in with ours, so they said fine. That would be good just as long as it's just the plat. That is what we have done here. What we are proposing is to build this 60 foot collector roadway coming in at this location here. In the preliminary site plans that I've seen on the school, they anticipate the building being located in this particular area kind of next to the Hunter Lateral. The school would be located in about this area and the reason being is the demography of the site. That has a slope to it so the building and their parking lots would go real well there. If they were to put ball fields they would have to do a substantial amount of grading. They anticipate the flatter portions of this site being utilized for their fields. This collector roadway will be bringing extending 12 inch water and 10 inch sewer down the collector roadway to here, stubbing to this site. This street here, the traffic circle and the stub street to our eastern boundary and then this roadway here are all proposed as public street to be built to public street standards and dedicated to Ada County Highway District. When the school is completed, the highway district then anticipates a light will be needed at that location. The school alone will generate approximately 3000 trips per day. The problem with the high school is its peak hour happens in a 30 minute time frame. In the morning, at lunch and when they leave. It is a short period of time. It is hard to manage that type of traffic. It's been explained to me that their peak traffic would be comparable to say retail uses that generate 25,000 trips a day because it is such a short timeframe. The little lane that we have right here, we have viewed that not as a private road but kind of an access driveway. Because the property line for the multi family would adjoin here, under uniform fire code we've got to have vehicular access like around these buildings. Like here, around the arena there is an access. That is what we intended this to function as. Each of these lots having cross access agreements or easements we show that on the plat, if staff still chooses for access, but we did not intend it to be like a public street. I see staffs comments that their worried that somebody may come down and go that direction. We may have to study that a little bit and talk to the traffic engineer and see if that would be a problem. With kids, cause they cut through that driveway we would want to know that now not after it's built. In staff's comments, just briefly I'll go through them. We have agreed to I believe most of their comments stated that we would comply. Pressurized irrigation, we will be building a pressure irrigation system to Nampa Meridian Irrigation standards, turning that system over to the district. I have contacted the Meridian School District to see if they would like to participate in the design and construction of a large regional pump station that would have the ability to service their ball fields and so forth. I have not received any answer. They may feel it premature at this time. If they have no interest in the pump station then we would proceed with building our pump station. Typically the way the systems are designed they have the ability to be upgraded with larger pumps and so forth. There was a discussion on landscaping on Locust Grove Meridian Planning and Zc ,g Commission Special Meeting March 22, 2000 Page 12 and Overland. We meet or exceed the requirements of the ordinance. We would like that to be an easement. We would be glad to put that easement on the plat. It is an easement for landscaping under jurisdiction of the association tying that into the protected covenants. As staff indicated, the purpose for that is to have consistency in the type of landscaping and the maintenance of that landscaping long term. Item 10, staff asked that we pipe the Hunter Lateral. We have agreed in our investigations on the Hunter Lateral we take a 36 inch concrete pipe approximately I believe your policy has been if it is less than a 48 inch then you are required to pipe it. We have agreed we will pipe it. The apartment complex, they feel it is important that they have some type of perimeter fence there. For buffer, for security purposes it wouldn't be like some industrial chain link looking thing. They want something that would look residential. As far as the interconnection we took staffs recommendation and we thought yep, that makes sense. Then we could capture some of that traffic in-between the two parcels and the two types of uses. If I may, this is kind of what we anticipate would work. It would be an access point between building 7 and 8 just above the traffic circle, interconnecting the two users. That would provide pedestrian access and vehicular access between the two. We feel the fencing along the remainder of that western boundary would not hamper interaction between the two uses. It would be—this access would be extended. This building would be clipped off. This access would be (inaudible) right here. I believe that is all that we have. The rest of the conditions we are in agreement. Do you have any questions. Barbeiro: On the road connecting in from Overland to the high school, how many lanes is that? Bowcutt: The highway district is going to determine the number of lanes. At this point, I don't believe it has been determined. We are providing a 60 foot right of way there with a 41 foot section, is what we anticipated. Your going to have multiple turn lanes out there at the entrance though. Like your probably –that entrance will be widened so you have multiple left hand lanes catching the light. With the volumes, there are going to have to do something like that. Maybe a free right hand turn. We will know that within a week of what they anticipate the build out for that. If they need a little more right of way, we do have quite a bit of landscaping running parallel on both sides of that collector roadway. Barbeiro: In the absence of the Ada County Highway District report then you would intend to having one lane in, two left hand turns and one right hand turn lanes for a total of 4 lanes wide at this point. Bowcutt: Possibly. Barbeiro: And, of course you would not use the second left hand turn lane until Overland was 5 lanes (inaudible). In the mean time that would be cross hashed. Bowcutt: They'd have to obviously have to do something like that, unless they can convince them to—improving that to 5 lanes, then it would be all ready to go. Meridian Planning and Zc` Tg Commission Special Meeting March 22, 2000 Page 13 Barbeiro: The Meridian School District in their notes asked for an additional access, emergency access, to the north to Overland. The current plat that you have does not address that and I did not see it in any of the additional notes. Bowcutt: i took a copy of this plat over to the school district and asked for input. They did not give me any comments to that effect, but they may have commented in writing. I have not seen that. There is a stub street here, at this location here at the eastern edge of Los Alamitos. There is a stub street located at the southern end in Los Alamitos. The vehicular access is intended to be that collector roadway there. We did not want to send the traffic this director here. That was based on the neighborhood meeting that we had. One of the main concerns that we heard from the residents, I believe at Sportsman Pointe, was we don't want that traffic going on to Locust Grove. We are trying to concentrate it at Overland. I think the secondary access is for emergency purposes, was it not? Barbeiro: That was the request. If I may quote Jim Carberry of the Meridian School District, Joint School District #2 would like to see a secondary access road to the north of the school site. According to the plat, there is only one entrance to the high school site from the north. This particular one does not explain whether it was an emergency or full access. Bowcutt: We have multiple points along here that we could, depending on their configuration because I don't know what their site plan is. They don't have one yet. I was told that they have authorized the architect to begin the site planning, but I have not seen any drafts other than a hand sketch that was given to us back in 97. There is multiple points that we could create emergency vehicle access through the complex itself. You could even come along here, here or along this parking lot. Like I said, it will be contingent upon their site plan because if I put one over here and that is the baseball diamond, it's not doing them a lot of good. Barbeiro: I was at the Meridian School District planning meeting for the new high school. They do have two proposed site plans. One which is a single building site plan and one is a campus site plan where the high school might have 3 or 4 different buildings and how those would be situated with the field. I would hope that you'd get a chance to meet with Jim Carberry. Again, I just happen to run into him today and he mentioned that the road had not been included in any of the plats that he'd seen and wanted to be sure that they wanted to do that. Bowcutt: Okay. I'll be glad to meet with them if they have something that is more concrete then what they had a few years back and we can work with that and try to satisfy them. Barbeiro: The high school going in behind here and as you said your going to have students flying out of there at lunch time, what provisions have you made for walking access from the high school to the existing businesses. Meridian Planning and Zc g Commission Special Meeting March 22, 2000 Page 14 Bowcutt: If you look at the colored—this is just a larger version of the site plan that is up there except in black and white. We have meandering sidewalks that will meander in the landscape area parallel with this collector road. They'd be off set from the roadway which would be safer for the pedestrians then putting the sidewalk (inaudible) a curb. They will meander through our landscaping all the way up to Overland and then will end up putting sidewalk all along our Overland frontage. That is always a standard condition of the highway district and the City of Meridian. We'd then end up putting sidewalk all along our Locust Grove frontage and then there is pathways that are delineated through out the multi family complex and then we show some pathways that run through here to try to link everything up pedestrian. One of staff comments was like to provide bicycle racks at some of these various uses. We concurred. That is an excellent idea. Barbeiro: Where I see a concern is since the building will be right here, they are not going to bicycle over here and then come back around over here. They are going jump side here, here. Bowcutt: No, they come through a pathway there at that southeast corner here. This would be piped, the Hunter Lateral. There would be no barrier for them here. We could put a pathway and meander it in here to intercept with the sidewalks or walk ways within the interior of the complex. Barbeiro: That would be a very, very nice idea. Having taught at Meridian High School and Centennial and Eagle High School, I have seen every traffic disaster that teenagers can do in high school environment. Is this site here that the school site in total or does in incorporate off to the side. Bowcutt: No sir it doesn't. What you see is everything that the school district owns. The out parcel right there is owned by the city of Meridian. That parcel is 4 acres. That parcel is 2.3. That parcel there in Thousand Springs adjoins it and I think it is 3 or 4 acres. That was going to be some type of a neighborhood park. Just to service the neighborhoods. Barbeiro: The plans that you have—do they—[ thought the lateral would be open. Will the landscaping remain along the tiled lateral. Bowcutt: Nampa Meridian typically if we tile it, then they want a gravel access roadway over the top of it and they won't allow us to plant any trees. We can't even plant turf within their easement without their approval through the license agreement process. We would have to work with them. Probably the optimum thing would try to have something that could function both as their access drive and as a pathway. Even if it were gravel, it could function that way. Barbeiro: Assuming I am a teenager with a new drivers license, your proposed access would cross over the lateral —zigzag through your multi family, I am the sixteen year old Meridian Planning and Zo- — g Commission Special Meeting March 22, 2000 Page 15 going to make this run here —cross over to get to Locust Grove so I could make a left turn, so on and so on. Bowcutt: We've discussed that. That was one of the concerns of the multi family applicant. One of the things that we talked about was possibly putting up coded gate for the residents and the residents have the code. I've seen that done on some retirement complexes in Boise. Older ones that back up, I think this one backed up to a shopping center, they had a key pad. That one was pedestrian only, whereas this one would be vehicular and pedestrian. Barbeiro: So you'd put a center gate which would allow pedestrian traffic and bicycles to pass at will. Bowcutt: We don't want to create a cut through situation either. So, something like that could be done. Borup: Becky, I think most of my questions have been answered. I am assuming that you had mentioned (Inaudible) Overland is five lanes now. I assume you design allowed for the additional right of way. Bowcutt: Yes sir. The site planning for Overland and Locust Grove takes into consideration of the future right of way needs to expand both the roadways to their build out width. Borup: Thank you. Now I'd like to invite up any public testimony, We do want to hear from everyone this evening. This is concerning the platting. Not the specific buildings. We may need to enforce our 3 minute limit but we will see how it goes. Shipley: John Shipley. 2770 S. Locust Grove. Listening to you folks, I don't recognize anybody but Mr. Borup. I have not been here for a long time. Obviously, if you knew what the law actually said about developing something ahead the roads and the schools, then it would be appropriate to address these things after those things were done. Borup: Is there a law that you are aware of that we are not. Shipley: I am aware that there can only be so many cars on the — Borup: You specifically said a law sir that we weren't aware of. Shipley: It was talked of in meetings and past times and I'm not aware of why nobody here knows about it. I don't know the number. If your speed is impeded by 1/3 the speed limit because of traffic, then there is too many cars. If you go ahead and okay all of this stuff without knowing what the highway district people have got in mind then it is just like spinning wheels. Meridian Planning and Zo, Commission Special Meeting March 22, 2000 Page 16 Borup: We agree. Maybe I need to repeat that again. Our intention—we have all ready discussed prior to that we will not be making any recommendation without the highway districts report. It is not our policy, especially on a project of this size. Shipley: Is the man named Kent Brown is he the same one that works at the highway district. Borup: No he isn't He is the same name, different person. Avera: My name is Herman Avera. I'm at 947 E. St. Maarten Drive in part of the Meridian Greens Subdivision. My concern if I understand the numbers correctly, is that they are suggesting that the high school is going to add an additional 3000 trips per day. At lunch time most of the fast food places that are there now are out on Meridian Road, which means they are going to have to get out on this one road, make a left turn onto Overland and go down to Meridian and make a right turn there to get to the fast food places for lunch. It would seem that you make a 1000 trips for that and then 1000 trips to get out of here in the afternoon and there is no light or stop light at that exit and that is the only exist out of there. My concern is for the safety not only for the students, but pedestrians who might be walking across there, because I know that the school buses stop along Overland Road now to pick up and drop off elementary kids. I don't know how that is going to be addressed. Borup: You feel a signal is necessary? Avera: Certainly a signal will be necessary by the time the school completes and the children are driving in and out. Yes. Barbeiro: Mr. Avera, if I may. If we used Eagle High School as a comparative, about 20 percent of the students at Eagle High School do leave and go onto Eagle Road for lunch. Meridian High School is closer to 30 percent. I believe this high school will be somewhere in-between. That would give you between 240 and 300 leaving at lunch time, not the 1000 you had thought. Avera: Do we think that 240 leaving here and turning left without a signal is safe. Barbeiro: It is never—the school is not intended to open prior to a signal being at that intersection. Christianson: James Christianson. 241 S. Brandy Jewel Avenue. I could not see the plat of the apartment buildings of where the access was to the apartment buildings. Is it coming off of Overland or – Borup: They were talking about right here. This is the apartment buildings here and there is— Christianson: I met how do they get out of the complex. Meridian Planning and Zc g Commission Special Meeting March 22, 2000 Page 17 Borup: Overland. That is the intention. Staff (inaudible) some access here so that people who live in these apartments can get to the commercial buildings. Christianson: (Inaudible) if they were going to the access road where the school is to get out or if they was going out on Overland. Borup: If they are travelling anywhere, they going Overland. If they want to get to these businesses I would assume they would use that so they don't have to fight the traffic. Thank you. Anyone else. Cushing: My name is Terry Cushing. I live at 1989 E. Doberman. My concern is that and I know that some of this has been addressed but I talked to the Ada County Highway District the other day and they assured me after their meeting that they was going to they figured this complex would generate 12000 trips a day. What they said was it would add 6000 and they figured the six was from people who would all ready be on Overland road or in the area. As a person who has to come up Locust Grove and turn onto Overland several times a day, I find it very difficult to do safely. I think that adding any kind of load to the streets there, until that street or until the light is put at Locust Grove, and in front of the high school, I think that it is an error that we should not be in acting any —1 am not trying to say not in my backyard or anything, but gracious sakes, we've got to be able to get out on that road and right now it is difficult and if you add 6000 trips, it is going to be impossible. Hinkley: Nathan Hinkley. East Puffin Court. What I want to know is what else is going to have to happen. There is no two ways about it. That land can't sit dormant forever. They want to build an ice skating rink and put stores in there and offices and the high school. I'm going to have to pay for the high school so are all my neighbors and my daughter will be using it. That is only right. But, for the rest of it, why does Ada County and the tax payers have to pay for the street improvements. I've done a lot of street lighting and a lot of traffic signals, why does not the developer pay for it. The developer should pay a little of it. They are adding the traffic. They are adding the congestion. Just asking why. Borup: Why they don't pay 100 percent of it? Hinkley: Not completely 100 percent but most of it. Why don't we get the roads built and the traffic signals in and then give them permission to go ahead and build. We vote on these things as we go, public hearings, city approvals or whatever. Borup: The applicant may want to clarify that but from her earlier testimony and assuming that's correct, she stated that 85 percent of the funds would be coming from impact fees, which is paying by the development. So, that has to happen first before the money is there. So the 15 percent would be from tax payers. 85 percent from the impact fees. Yes, developers in this area. Meridian Planning and Zc g Commission Special Meeting March 22, 2000 Page 18 Hinkley: Will we get the roads built and the traffic signals and then put all this stuff in. Borup: Because you won't have the money. They have to apply for the permit and then they pay the money at the time they apply and then the money there. It can happen gradually. Anyone else like to come forward. Rassmusson: Sonya Rassmusson. I live at 1395 E. Peacock. I know there is a lot of concern about all the traffic that will happen. There on Overland especially with all the high school students. I am worried about it too but it is really important that we get a high school because the high school is so over crowded and we do need on there. It is a good location. I am hoping that there is a lot of neighborhoods close by and that I am hoping that the school district will put walk way access from Los Alamitos. It would be nice if the students from Sportsman and even Meridian Greens could walk to the school. I am hoping that will alleviate a little of the traffic. I know a lot of kids will still drive, but I think it is important that we work with the Ada County Highway District. Even just getting a turning lane and a light at the beginning when the school is opened, I know I talked to them. They are not looking at doing anything until 2004 and they aren't going to bump that up just because a school is going in. I don't know. How does the Planning and Zoning Commission—can you work together with the Ada County Highway District in getting a turning lane and a light? Borup: I agree. I think that is —again it's my personal opinion. I think it is going to be necessary for this. I think the applicant would agree with that too. Tom has said the school is going to require a light and the turning lane is going to need to be without stopping up traffic, so I think those are two very pertinent suggestions. Barbeiro: I understood that before the school opened there would be a stop light there. That was one of the requirements and also turn lanes. Are you referring to Overland and Locust Grove or the intersection where the high school will be coming out. Rassmusson: Right now the school only has that one main entrance. They were thinking they should have another one but they have no plan for it right now. The ideal location would be off of Eagle Road but they'd have to cut across. I don't even know what is going in there, next to the site. Is there anything planned for over there? The neighbors are going to fight if you go through Los Alamitos as a—they don't want teenagers running up and down their streets. They need to find an entrance somewhere else but have at least walk way access for the students to walk through and for the community. They want to involve the community and use the facilities so it would be nice if neighbors could walk. Barbeiro: Are you referring to popping a little easement so that they can access the site just by walking through it. The school intends to be right here and these are all going to be lawn fields so of course you couldn't have a driving access. Meridian Planning and Z( "ig Commission Special Meeting March 22, 2000 Page 19 Rassmusson: No, but they are still going to be cutting through neighborhoods. If I lived in that Subdivision, I would not want because if you had football games you'll get a lot of traffic going through those neighborhoods. Barbeiro: I think this is one where when the final layout for the school comes out, that would be the time to find out how you wanted to have that cross traffic going through. I don't see the cross traffic coming from the high school because it is intended to have emergency access, but this road here will be the single entrance in with the hope that an emergency road may come along. Borup: Any one else. Bertell: Marianne Bertell, 2534 S. Velvet Falls. In all of this development the impact of all the homes, we still have two more Subdivision being completed also in that area and all of this, I really fell the at the City of Meridian needs to put some bike paths and park area usable to the public that live there now and pay taxes. Some of that area should be set aside for the public who lives there. Borup: Maybe like right down at this corner would be good. Bertell: That is not big enough and it is not accessible. You can't get through to it. Borup: How many acres do you feel it should be? Bertell: I don't know. I just know more than 5 acres. You needs access also from Locust Grove for people walking, biking etc. Borup: That is a question 1 don't know if we know how they are proposing access to that park area. Bertell: It would almost have to go up where your commercial zoning starts and cut across somehow. Borup: Right now there is street stubs right here that would get to the park. Bertell: But again they are the Subdivisions and people don't want everyone coming through their subdivision. There is a lot of people needing access to a park area and to the school from Locust Grove. A bike path. A walking path. Then, some sort of public park large enough to accommodate that large of area of population. 5 acres is not adequate for that large population. There will be thousands of homes there. Traston: John Traston for (inaudible) sub. I was wondering if anybody considered another option on the high school on which instead of having it located back off of Overland, if it joined Overland there would be room for two access streets and to the high school parking area. That would alleviate the high school kids from having to drive Meridian Planning and Z ig Commission Special Meeting March 22, 2000 Page 20 in and out of residential areas or retail store areas. Instead of having it behind, have it right up on the street. Borup: And then have the people drive through the school to get to the retail. Traston: Well there in behind that there is room for a park. Borup: And your talking to the wrong people here. We are not the school board. Traston: Yeah, but that seems it would take care of a few problems as far as access for the school and then it would also take care of the next problem number 5 on how to get rid of that nasty old farmer complex. Borup: Anyone else before we sum up. Seeing none. Becky any final comments? Bowcutt: Just briefly, Ada County Highway District stated to me today which is consistent with what Mr. Barbeiro has stated, that they would not allow that high school to go in without that signal being there. They had the same requirement for Eagle High School at Park and Highway 44. Concerning the traffic, we pay for a lot of our improvements with impact fees. The majority of the development out in this vicinity had been single family dwellings where you are paying 600 700 dollars per home. That money is coming in. When you start having your larger users, such as the ice hockey facility or a retail or an office building, they are getting that money in a big chunk. It is not hundreds of dollars, sometimes it is hundreds of thousands of dollars. For example, the BLM Building that we did, the impact fee for that facility was all most $200,000. That provides a lot of money for the highway district to go in and bring these roads up to par. As I stated before, if we can get the highway district to look further down the road and get this as a priority, then it will benefit everyone including the eventual school district. They stated it is on their 5 year plan. It is not 20 years away. It is on their 5 year plan. The way they work it with their 5 year plan, if it is on there, there it is programmed. It may move up on the schedule. It may move back on the schedule. A good example is the Locust Grove improvements that are taking place in your vicinity. They moved —those were supposed to be in 1999. They moved them out to 2002. Then they moved them back to 2000. They have juggled around 4 or 5 different times and finally they ended up making the improvement on the bridge. That is how they work. They've got a lot of people that have many items on their wish list and they are trying to prioritize. I feel that this high school is obviously going to have to be a priority. The safety of the teenagers, the adjoining developments is a priority. The stub streets here in Raven Hills and in Los Alamitos, when those Subdivision were designed, they were intended to be a residential street to connect to another residential street because this property had come through as a single family development. They were never intended to be a collector roadway for any use more intensive such as the high school. The city has been putting that together (the park site) and has been donated as each of these properties developed. When this property was annexed they got 4.2 acres. When Los Alamitos was developed they got 2.9. When Thousand Springs was platted they got another 4 and when this parcel here is ever developed or asked for annexation, Meridian Planning and Zci g Commission Special Meeting March 22, 2000 Page 21 they will get the last piece of the puzzle. I think that the intent is to be between 10 and 12 acres. It is a neighborhood park, not a community park. As far as a park that people would drive to, they want a park that people will walk, bike, job and so forth. It is not intended to be like a sports park or regional park that you find at Eagle Road and McMillan. That one the City of Boise has been constructing and that sits on 40 acres and it serves the whole west side there. This is just intended to service these Subdivisions. Right now we've been working in Thousand Springs Development. We've been working on a crossing of the Ridenbaugh Canal to make a connection between Los Alamitos and Thousand Springs. That will also facilitate people walking to the park and back and forth. It will also take some vehicular traffic and take it eastward out to Eagle Road, so that will also help. It will give you guys a secondary access because at this point of time you have one access here with a connection to Raven Hills there, but they both dump to Locust Grove. That gives you an alternative. Borup: Any questions for Becky. One clarification. You said ACHD said their going to be putting a signal in—part of that signal include the turn lane. Is that part of the signal design normally or did they indicate either way. Is that something you anticipate the developer would be taking care of. Bowcutt: I anticipate we will end of putting the turn lanes—I think the traffic study stated that a middle turn lane needed to be provided in Locust Grove. Borup: I was thinking on Overland. Bowcutt: Extra lanes in Overland, widening of Overland there and creating some turn lanes. I won't know the specifics until the highway district completes their analysis. We are going to have to pay our proportionate share. I had some developments where they figured our share of a signal was 50% or 30% and you pay you trust fund that money so you write them out a check for X number of dollars. That money is then used to put that signal in. That happens. We can't—someone says well why can't this wait till the roadway goes in. I don't think they are going to build the roadway until the development goes in and the school goes in. If my development doesn't go in, the school can't go in. We've got to pull the sewer, the water, 3 phase power, bill collector roadways, there is a lot of work that's got to be done. We spent $250,000 just getting the sewer across Interstate 84 to Overland Road. That was 2700 feet of a big deep sewer line. We assisted the City with the water line and doing a joint effort there which saved the City a considerable amount of money. We used the same contractor and did a joint effort. We have been trying to do our part to improve the infra structure out in this area. We are not going to stop here with the roadway. We are going to do what we can. The highway district can't tell a developer go in and you build Overland Road 5 lanes all the way over from Locust Grove to Eagle Road. The reason being is the need for that roadway to be improved is not just due to our usage, but the existing usage in the area. They can't put that burden upon you. In fact if they do make you do certain things that increase capacity that is not related to you, they have to reimburse you. END OF SIDE TWO Meridian Planning and Z ^-ig Commission Special Meeting r March 22, 2000 Page 22 Bowcutt: Friday of this week in draft form. Borup: I just want it to be before our next meeting. Bowcutt: Yes. Barbeiro: I wanted to clarify, you had discussed about entering into some sort of agreement where you (inaudible) would pay for the widening of Overland to the half way point, then the County would cover the rest of it. It would be in one single project. Bowcutt: That is what we are trying to do. A joint effort to try and cut down on the cost. Barbeiro: Your going to pay a considerable amount in impact fees. Bowcutt: They would give you impact fee credits. That's what we discussed. Like they said, they qualified that. That has to have approval of the Commission. The staff can not make that commitment. For example for the public, say we spend $300,000 improving Overland Road and installing a signal. Then, the impact fees that would be applied to the uses on the site, that money would be credited so you would not have to pay those impact fees. They have a provision to go about it in that fashion but it has to have commission approval because they are basically dispensing with public funds and staff can't do that. Barbeiro: In other words, you would pay your impact fees up front as opposed to paying them incrementally as the buildings come in and then as you buildings come in the County would credit you back the fees that would have come from those individual lots. One of your options is to pay up front impact fees that you may not be charged for 6 or 7 years until you get complete build out. Bowcutt: If Ada County Highway District would agree to that. I have some projects where they would not agree. A lot of it depended on they didn't want to see a portion of a roadway improved because they believe that that causes more hazard then it helps. For example, say building Overland Road from Locust Grove for a half mile 5 lanes and then it nets down to two. They'd want to be able to do the whole thing and (inaudible) sometimes they will say no, we don't want to use impact fee credits in this instance. Barbeiro: Somehow I think with the implementation of a high school in this place you would find an exception. Bowcutt: I would hope that they will work with us and I have asked them to look at the options and be open minded and take into account that school that that is going to happen within a relatively short period of time. Barbeiro: Also wanted to get your confirmation if you are aware of it, while the school comes in here about 1/3 of a mile, I believe it was intended (inaudible) was planning to Meridian Planning and Zr—ng Commission Special Meeting March 22, 2000 Page 23 have another light at that point and then go out to Eagle. This 1/3 of a mile was –the light was much later on until of course it is all built in so they would go a light at Locust Grove, the high school and 1/3 mile. Bowcutt: That was one of the things that they discussed today was the timing of that. think they believe that the light at Locust Grove would come first. My question to them when the overpass is constructed which that may become a reality from what I'm hearing. Its being lobbied for. My question was, would that light then the money spent be wasted and their indication was no. They would have to move the light, but the money spent would not be wasted. Barbeiro: Apart from that when you talk about moving the light—when they planned the lights they still will likely be out far enough where they can build the road and not move the lights. All they have to do is rewire. Bowcutt: One of the engineers thought they would probably have to move it a little bit. Why they do that I don't know. Maybe they can't get it out that far when the roadway is up here. The arms are only at certain length. I don't know. He thought it would have to be moved. Borup: Thank you. Norton: Mr. Chairman, I am ready to make a motion. I move that we continue this public hearing to April 11, 2000 so we can hear and read the ACHD report. This is for the request for the preliminary plat of 107.06 acres of LO and CN zoning for proposed Resolution Business Park. Barbeiro: I would second the motion Mr. Chairman. Borup: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES 4. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPOSED PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF MULTI -FAMILY, COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND LDS SEMINARY, LO AND CG ZONING BY G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC—OVERLAND AND LOCUST GROVE ROADS: Borup: Brad. Would you like to explain the difference between Item number 4 and Item number 5. I'd like to open the public hearing. Hawkins Clark: Yes, the difference between Item number 4, conditional use permit for a conceptual overall plan. This CUP basically is not approving any specific use that is currently shown up on the screen. It is simply the applicant is coming to us and saying MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING: March 22, 2000 APPLICANT: G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT ITEM NUMBER: 3 REQUEST: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF 107.06 ACRES LO AND CG ZONING FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING & ZONING DEPT. COMMENTS COMING CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: SEE COMMENTS CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WASTEWATER DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: SEE COMMENTS NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SEE COMMENTS 1 SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: kyL. C US WEST. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: SANITARY SERVICE: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR LEGAL DEPARTMENT A Good Place to Live Robert D. Corrie (208) 288-2499 •Fax 288-2501 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHOBUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN,. IDAHO 83642 x'(208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813PLANNING AND ZONING City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT Cherie McCandless ity of Nleridia (208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6854 itp Cl,-rk Offi, TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000 FILE NUMBER: PP -00-006 REQUEST: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF 107.06 ACRES – LO AND CG ZONING FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY: G L VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED) SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR _RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C _TAMMY de WEERD, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE :VUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM & FINAL) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS L L C Q, I_-) .e .3 Lt-; r L L Al -k-<l c-2 7 o CENTRAL (C q7tr_ DISTRICTHEALTH DEPARTMENT Rezone # CENTKAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT Environmental Health Division Conditional Use # Prelimina / Final / Short Plat _ '7'/P — n C) — 0C) L Return to: ❑ Boise ❑ Eagle ❑ Garden City ,'Meridian ❑ Kuna ❑ ACz ❑ I. We have No Objections to this Proposal. MAR 6 2000 ❑ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. CITY F�L' ❑ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ❑ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ❑ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ❑ high seasonal ground water ❑ waste flow characteristics ❑ or bedrock from original grade ❑ other ❑ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. ❑ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: central sewage Elcommunity sewage system Elcommunity water well ❑ interim sewagecentral water ❑ individual sewage Ll individual water 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Divof Environmental Quality: isioicentral sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water ❑ sewage dry lines central water 10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ❑ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ❑ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ❑ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ❑ food establishment ❑ swimming pools or spas ❑ child care center ❑ beverage establishment ❑ grocery store 14.ii.9l'/ Si o�u� r�2 ' ��,:.1 Date: 3 /-.2— Reviewed .2—Reviewed By: Au CDHD 10/91 rd, rev. 7/97 Review Sheet CENTRAL (( •• DISTRICT WHEUTH DEPARTMENT MAIN OFFICE - 707 N. ARMSTRONG PL - BOISE, ID 83704-0825 - (K3)375-51211 To prevent and treat disease and disability; to promote healthv li%styles; and to protect and promote the health and quality of our environnneut. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that storm water be pre-treated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to ground water and surface water quality. The engineers and architects involved with the design of this project should obtain current best management practices for storm water disposal and design a storm water management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals that could be used for guidance are: State of Idaho Catalog of Stormwater Best Management Practices For Idaho Cities and Counties. Prepared by the Idaho Division of Environmental Quality, July 1997. Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook. Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department, January 1997. Ada / Boise County Office 707 N Armsrong PI. Boise, ID 83704 Enviro. Health: 327-7499 Family Planning: 327-7400 immunizations: 327-7450 Senior Nutrition: 327-7460 WIC: 327-7488 FAX: 327-8500 Serving Valley, Eltnore, Boise, and Ada Counties Ada -WIC Satellite Office 1606 Robert St. Boise, ID 83705 Ph. 334-3355 FAX: 334-3355 Elmore County Office 520 E. 8th Street N. Mountain Home, ID 83647 Enviro. Health: 587-9225 Family Health: 587-4407 WIC: 587-4409 FAX: 587-3521 Valley County Office 703N 1 st Street P0. Box 1448 McCall, ID. 83638 Ph 634-7194 FAX h334-2174 March 2, 2000 MAR - 6 2000 CITY OF MEftFD1AN �r�ia �i �Penid�ast %vti�atioct �ld�ttct Will Berg, City Clerk Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission 33 East Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 Re: PP -00-006 Resolution Subdivision Dear Commissioners: 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District's Hunter Lateral courses along the west boundary of the proposed project. The District reserves the right to claim what we deem necessary to operate and maintain the Hunter Lateral. All storm drainage must be retained on site. Sincerely, Bill Henson, Asst. Water Superintendent NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT cl:ff:m Cc: File — Shop File — Office Water Superintendent Briggs Engineering, Inc. — Becky Bowcutt APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 SUEEIVISION EVALUATION "BEET Proposed Development Name Resolution Subdivision File # ',1,-'.R - 7 2000 CM N LUERM Date Reviewed 3/1/00 Preliminary Stage Final XX Engineer/Developer Briggs Engineering Becky Bowcut The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Boise City Street Name Ordinance. The following streets are existing and the names shall appear on the plat: "OVERLAND RD." and "S. LOCUST GROVE RD." The following street names are approved for this development and shall be placed on the reserved list: "S. CELEBRATION AVE." "E. GALA ST." "E. Y2K LANE" and "S. RESOLUTION LANE" The name "MILLENNIUM" is on the reserved list for another development. Please choose another name. The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE ,,4GEWY REJ�2ESENTATIVES OR DESIGNEES Ada County Engineer John Priester Community Planning Assoc. Sue Hansen City of Meridian Cheryl Sable Meridian Fire District Representative Date 3 7 �— Date Date .3 -_2 Date 3,3-60 0 NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed 1111 Sub Index Street Index Section NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS l 44fL2 G%D� l6h TRISUBSZM C1TY.FRM SUP"IVISION EVALUATION ,"EET Proposed Development Name Resolution Subdivision File # Date Reviewed 1/11/00 Preliminary Stage XX Fina Engineer/Developer Briggs Engineering, Becky Bowcut f ' U,1''/ Fa, ,,IAR - 7 2 0 0 u Uri OF iVIERIDIL The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Boise City Street Name Ordinance. The following streets are existing and the names shall appear on the plat: "OVERLAND RD." and "S. LOCUST GROVE RD." The following street names are approved for this development and shall be placed on the "S. MILLENNIUM WAY" S. CELEBRATION AVE." "E GALA ST." "E Y2K LANE" and The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE,/�ENPY RIESENTATIVES OR DESIGNEES Ada County Engineer John Priestei Community Planning Assoc. Sue Hansen City of Meridian Meridian Fire District Cheryl Sable Representati) Date I -/ 3 -00— Date / -13-0d Date /-/.3-U d Date / / `1 NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed 1111 Subindex Street Index Section NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS O/L_L/ 1131,1)67 TRISU8SISM_CITY.FRM BRIGGS EW.,MEERING Inc, ENGINEERS / PLANNERS / SURVEYORS January 3, 2000 Ms. Sue Hansen APA Mapping 650 Main Street Boise, Idaho 83702 Re: Reservation of Street Names Proposed G.L. Voigt Development Dear Anne: 1800 West Overland Road Boise, Idaho 83705 — 3142 Voice (208) 344-9700 Fax (208) 345-2950 E-mail BEI-Idaho@msn.com Fr, /1 - EJ:,_! 1- 7*77 - " A4 -AR - 7 2006 CITY OF �11E, RiD in, Please review the following street names for a parcel located in the NW '/4, Section 20, 13N., R IE. 1. Millennium Way 2. Gala Street 3. Celebration Avenue 4. Resolution Lane (Private) 5. Y2K Lane (Private) Sincerely, BRIGGS ENGINEERING, Inc. Becky L. Bowcutt Land Use Planner C 4. 990123\Stmame MAYOR Robert D. Corrie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tammy deWeerd Cherie McCandless ,..� NUB OF TREASURE VALLEY ^ A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208)884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 MEMORANDUM: March 20, 2000 EFJTo: Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council FC From: Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Technician?q�_— MAR 2 0 2000 Brad Hawkins -Clark, Planner34r– City- of Meridian Christy Richardson, Planner City- Clerk Offic- Re: - Request for a Annexation and Zoning of 16.1 Acres from R -T to C -G by Overland, L.L.C. (File AZ -00-004) - Rezone of 37.6 Acres from R-4 to L -O by G.L. Voigt (File RZ-00-003) - Preliminary Plat of 107.06 Acres by G.L. Voigt (File PP -00-006) - Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Commercial Development (RESOLUTION PLAZA) consisting of Multi -Family, Commercial, Office and LDS Seminary in the proposed L -O and C -G Zones (File CUP -00-017) - Conditional Use Permit for a 200 Unit Luxury Apartment Complex by Desert West Properties, L.L.C. (File CUP -00-015) - Conditional Use Permit for a 86,160 Square Foot Ice Arena by Pat McKeegan (File CUP -00-016) We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATIONS SUMMARY There are six (6) separate applications covered in this report, each addressed separately after the summary. Five of the applications are associated with two parcels and propose a Planned Commercial Development (PD -C), generally located at the SE corner of Overland and South Locust Grove Roads. The sixth application (preliminary plat) also includes a 55 -acre parcel to the south of the PD -C owned by the Meridian School District and site of a future high school. The PD -C proposed uses include retail, office, an LDS Seminary, a 1,430 -seat ice hockey arena (two rinks), a daycare and a 200 -unit luxury apartment complex. The annexation application applies only to the 16 -acre parcel west of the Hunter Lateral. The rezone application applies only to the 37.64 -acre parcel south of Overland and east of the Hunter. Since ACHD has not yet submitted a report on the Preliminary Plat or three (3) CUP applications, Staff is recommending these four (4) applications be continued or tabled. Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ.PP.CUP.doc AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Mayor, Council and P&� March 20, 2000 Page 2 LOCATION The property is generally located at the SE corner of Overland Road and South Locust Grove Road with approximately %2 mile of frontage along Overland. The future high school parcel is currently land -locked and directly south of the 36 -acre parcel. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North — R.V. park, Cesco (John Deere), Transport, Truck & Trailers, future location of Treasure Valley Music, and two vacant parcels. All are zoned C -G (Meridian). South — An LDS church is currently being constructed on the Ada County parcel immediately south of the Overland, LLC parcel fronting on Locust Grove. Rim View Subdivision, zoned RI in Ada County, is south of the church. Raven Hill and Los Alamitos Subdivision, zoned R4 (Meridian), lie south of the school parcel. East — Several large, vacant parcels currently in agricultural use are east of the subject parcels. All are zoned RT (Ada County). West — Several phases of Sportsman Pointe Subdivision, zoned R4, lies across Locust Grove Road to the west. There is also an unplatted, triangular shaped parcel at the SW corner of the intersection that is not in City limits, zoned RT (Ada Co.), with a single family residence. CURRENT OWNERS OF RECORD Gary L. Voigt is the property owner of the 37.6 acre parcel. Craig Groves and Greg Johnson (Overland LLC) are the owners of the 16.1 acre parcel. Meridian Joint School District No. 2 is the owner of the 55 acre parcel. All owners have submitted consent to be a part of these applications. GENERAL COMMENTS/OVERVIEW (All Applications) 1. The 1993 Meridian Comprehensive Plan was amended by Resolution #266 (File CPA -99- 005) for the Voigt and Overland LLC parcels from Single Family Residential to Mixed/Planned Use Development on 11-16-99 by action of the City Council. Under the amended Mixed Use designation, the proposed uses are permitted. 2. The applicant has proposed a tentative phasing plan consisting of four levels of priority: Phase I - Ice Hockey Facility (Construction anticipated in year 2000) Phase II - Apartment Complex Site `B" (Construction anticipated in year 2001) Phase III - Office/Retail Site "C" (Schedule dependent on tenant sales) Phase IV - Commercial/Office Site "A" (Applicant anticipates that this corner will not develop until the Locust Grove overpass is constructed.) NOTE: The Final Plat must be recorded prior to issuance of any building permits or Certificates of Zoning Compliance. 3. The Meridian School District will be a party to the preliminary plat at the City's request. The Meridian School District does not support nor oppose the Resolution Plaza project. It should be noted that the School District plans a High School on their 54.99 acre site. Development of the school site is contingent on a bond issue. The school district has indicated that a bond AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-013 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&:"—" March 20, 2000 Page 3 issue for the high school will be submitted for a vote in the fall of 2000. If approved, construction of the school will take place in 2001. 4. On July 19, 1999, the APA (COMPASS) Board of Directors moved the proposed Locust Grove/I-84 overpass from the Destination 2020 Plan (soft projection) to the Transportation Improvement Plan (hard planning document). APA projects a dramatic increase in traffic for South Locust Grove when the overpass is constructed and they support a transportation management plan be developed for this project to coordinate the commuter needs of future residents and employees. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (All Applications) Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for non- domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements. 4. Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 5. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 6. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section. 7. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 8. Provide five -foot -wide sidewalks in accordance.with City Ordinance. 9. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaz .AZ.RZTRCUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&''' March 20, 2000 Page 4 ANNEXATION & ZONING REQUIREMENTS (File AZ -00-004) The legal description submitted in the application appears to meet the requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission. The parcel is contiguous to the existing corporate city limits of Meridian. 2. Staff agrees with the Applicant's forecast that the Overland/Locust Grove area will become a major intersection, especially with the construction of the I-84/Locust Grove overpass. Staff also agrees that neighborhood commercial services are needed in this area to service the existing residential subdivisions and proposed apartment complex residents. However, we do not support the proposed C -G zone. Staff recommends a lower -intensity commercial zone Neighborhood Commercial (C -N). All of the proposed uses listed in item #10 of the application (retail,. day care, and office) are permitted either outright or with a CUP in both the C -N and C -G. But there are several uses permitted in the C -G that are prohibited in the C -N, including auto repair, service stations, hotels, truck stops, heavy equipment sales and auto sales lots. Given the previously stated concerns of the Sportsman Pointe and Los Alamitos residents and the increased number of children in the apartment complex, Staff feel the down -zoned C -N is a more appropriate zone and will adequately meet the development intentions of the Applicant. The subject lots can be adequately served by public facilities, and the proposed uses will allow for orderly expansion of the city limits. 4. A Development Agreement will be required as a condition of annexation Annexation Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the annexation but denial of the requested C -G zone. We recommend C -N zoning. REZONE REQUIREMENTS (File RZ-00-003) The legal description submitted in the application appears to meet the requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission. 2. Staff agrees with the proposed Limited Office (L -O) zone. It is the most appropriate zone for the proposed mixed uses within the Planned Development. 3. The subject lot can be adequately served by public facilities, and the proposed uses will allow for orderly expansion of the city limits. 4. A Development Agreement will be required as a condition of rezone. Rezone Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the rezone with the requested L -O zone. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaz .AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&:� March 20, 2000 Page 5 PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL COMMENTS (File PP -00-006) Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 2. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 3. Assessment fees for water and sewer service are determined during the building plan review process. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Re -Assessment Agreement with the City of Meridian for all commercial uses. An assessment agreement is a vehicle that protects the City of Meridian and the Developer in the event that estimated assessments are not in line with actual usages. The agreement provides for reimbursement to the developer for over payment of assessments and payment to the City of Meridian of any shortfall in assessments. The overpayment/shortfall is determined after adequate historical usage. PRLIMINARY PLAT REQUIREMENTS (File PP -00-006) 1. Sanitary sewer service to this site will be via extensions from the Five Mile Trunk that is currently under construction by this applicant. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline. 2. Water service to this site will be via extensions from newly constructed mains under the interstate, and from extensions of existing mains installed in adjacent developments. Applicant will be responsible to construct the water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Please provide the Public works department with information on anticipated fire flow and domestic water requirements for the proposed site. Water service to this development is contingent upon positive results from a hydraulic analysis by our computer model. Flow and pressure from the existing mains should be monitored with the Meridian Water Department. 3. Two -hundred -fifty- and 100 -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 4. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on site. Please submit hook-up and design details based on the proposed landscaping. Due to the size of landscaped area, primary water supply connection to the City's mains will not be allowed. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaz&AZ.RZTRCUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&'�`' March 20, 2000 Page 6 5. Applicant has not indicated whether the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and maintained by an association or the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. If the system is being proposed as a private system, plans and specifications for the irrigation system shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department as part of the development plan, review process. A draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system O&M manual must be submitted prior to plan approval. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area. 6. Show all existing easements for irrigation/drainage facilities located within the boundaries of this proposed development (i.e. Hunter Lateral easements). 7. Detailed landscape plans for the Overland Road and Locust Grove Road landscape frontage buffers and for street landscaping along Millenium Way and Celebration Avenue shall be submitted for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat application. This requirement does not include interior lot landscaping. Interior landscaping will be dealt with on a site by site review basis with future CUP applications. A letter of credit or cash surety will be required for the improvements prior to signature on the Final Plat. 8. Staff recommends the Overland and Locust Road landscape buffers be platted as separate common lots within the subdivision and maintenance be the responsibility of the Development Committee/Association. The draft CC&Rs submitted with the application states each separate lot owner in the subdivision will be responsible for construction, installation and maintenance of landscaping on each building site. By placing responsibility for the arterial landscape buffers with a single entity (the Association), greater consistency of design and maintenance may be achieved. At a minimum, the landscape buffers shall be placed within a permanent landscape easement designated as such on the plat. No easements are currently shown. 9. Six -foot -high, permanent perimeter fencing shall be required along the eastern boundary of Lot 1, Block 3, and Lot 2, Block 1, and along the southern boundary of Lot 15 & 16, Block 1. Submit detailed fencing plans for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat. All required fencing is to be in place prior to issuance of building permits. 10. The Applicant is proposing to construct a fence along the east boundary of the Hunter Lateral. Staff recommends the Lateral be piped and no fence constructed. Given the close proximity of the proposed 200 unit apartment complex, High School, and Daycare, staff recommends the applicant be required to comply with Ord. 12-4-13 (Piping of AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doe Mayor, Council and P&Z '...' March 20, 2000 Page 7 Ditches). The City required the developers of Raven Hill and Los Alamitos subdivisions (upstream from subject site) to tile the Hunter and see no reason this site should receive an exemption from the piping ordinance. 11. Applicant shall provide a vehicular access across the Hunter Lateral from the proposed apartment complex (Site `B") to the proposed Office/Retail area (Site "A"). The purpose of this connection is to minimize the vehicular impact on Overland Road and to provide an internal connection to the Daycare and Retail sites. The Transportation Impact Study submitted by Dobie Engineering, Inc. assumed 20% of the office and day care traffic would be captured within the complex. However, this capturing cannot take place unless an internal access road is provided. If a connection is not provided across the Hunter, an additional 20% of vehicle trips would be added to Overland Road (based on Dobie's estimations). 12. Applicant has provided the minimum required 35 feet of landscape buffer along Overland Road, an entryway corridor. Staff agrees. They show 25 feet of landscape buffer along Locust Grove Road (including the 5 foot wide detached sidewalk). Since Locust Grove is not listed as an entryway corridor, Staff supports the 25 -foot buffer width for this arterial. At a minimum, the Overland Road landscape buffer must be completed from the eastern property boundary to 30 feet west of Millenium Way prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy for any building within the subdivision. 13. Applicant is proposing a 30 -foot wide private road (Y2K Lane) to serve Lot 6 and 8. Block I. Applicant should explain the purpose for the private classification and whether or not sidewalks will be provided. All private roads must approved by the City Council. Staff questions the intent of the private classification, particularly when this will be the first drive providing access into the site for eastbound traffic on Overland and will likely be heavily used. If approved, Staff recommends 5 -foot sidewalks be provided on at least one (1) side of the road. Preliminary Plat Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions: a) additional fencing is provided, b) the Hunter Lateral is tiled, c) provide a single vehicular connection across the Hunter Lateral, and d) landscaping is provided and constructed per item #12. Until the City receives a copy of the ACHD report, the public hearing should be continued. CUP (PUD/COMMERCIAL) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-017) As part of a conditional use permit, the City of Meridian may impose restrictions and conditions in addition to current City Ordinances. 2. This Conditional Use Permit is for the overall concept only. Future phases of the project will require separate Conditional Use Permits for each phase and each must substantially comply with the final approved Concept Plan. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z~ March 20, 2000 Page 8 3. Conceptually (based upon the submitted Overall Preliminary Site Plan dated 2-01-00), staff believes the project is in accord with the purpose of Planned Developments as outlined in the Subdivision & Development Ordinance. The mixed residential, office, recreation and retail uses meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and should contribute to a reduction in traffic in this area. 4. Planned Development Regulations: As a mixed/planned use development, the Resolution Plaza development must comply with the following sections of the subdivision ordinance: 12-6-4 Procedures for Planned Developments, 12-6-6 General Regulations for Planned Development, and 12-6-7 General Standards for Planned Developments. In addition, residential areas must comply with 12-6-8-A Design Standards for Planned Development -Residential. All commercial and office uses must comply with 12-6-8-B Design Standards for Planned Development -Commercial. 5. Colored Rendering: Colored renderings of the development must be submitted prior to the City Council meeting to meet the intent of Section 12-6-4 of the PD ordinance. 6. Open Space: All Planned Developments (PD) are required to have at least 10% of the gross land area of the PD as common open space as 12-6-7-E-5. The total common open space calculation for Resolution Plaza is shown separately on Sheets 1-3 (Sites "A" — "C"). Site "A" is 4.53 acres (1.44 required), Site "B" is 5.29 acres (1.45 required), and Site "C" is 4.10 acres (1.86 required). These calculations include landscape buffers and islands. Standard practice has been that residential PD's cannot count required buffers and landscape setbacks toward the 10% open space requirement, but commercial PD's have been allowed to count it. Total gross site acreage for the Resolution Plaza project is 47.04 acres (excluding public rights-of-way). 10% open space would be 4.7 acres. The minimum amount of open space has been met. All open space delineated as common open space must meet all standards of 12-6-7-E. 7. Parking: The matrix below summarizes the total off-street parking counts for the conceptual PD -C: Site / Use " K Parkin Proposed Parkin Required il ads N of first drivewa (3) 257 250 -Retail& office pads b/w driveways (2) 183 181 - Office & day care pads S of second driveway Site "A" Total 189 629 100 (est.) 531 Site "B" (Apartment complex) 553* 460 (2.3/d.u.) Site "C" - Retail & office pads on Y2K Lane (2) 156 151 AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016. CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ.PP. CUP. doc Mayor, Council and P&Z� March 20, 2000 Page 9 - LDS Seminary 17 20 (est.) - Office buildings S of Gala St. (2) 129 98 - Retail & office buildings N of Gala St. 2) 317 287 - Ice Arena 278 286 (1/5 seats *The Applicant is proposing 152 tandem parking spaces for the complex. The P&Z Commission discouraged tandem parking for a proposed apartment complex of similar size in October 1999 (Valerie Heights). If the tandem parking is subtracted from the total parking spaces, their total provided would be 401 spaces. On the Site "A" plan, a row of parking is proposed along the south edge of the north driveway and along both the north and south edges of the south driveway with no separation. Given the likelihood of these private driveways receiving high volumes of traffic at build -out (functioning more as public roads), Staff feels this design would be unsafe and should be relocated. The first parking stalls are less than 40 feet from the property line and vehicles backing out of the stalls into the drive aisle will likely be a hazard for vehicles entering the site off Locust Grove. The proposed Ice Arena seats a total of 1,430 people. Technically, the Applicant meets City ordinance, which is based on one stall for every 5 seats. If one assumes the arena will utilize the parking north of Gala Street for evening events, an additional 317 stalls could feasibly be added to serve the arena, providing a total of 595 stalls. The Applicant should provide more detail on the hours of operation for the ice arena and their experience with other similar venues and whether or not both rinks will be used simultaneously. 8. Parking Lot Landscaping: Landscape islands serving a single row of parking shall have one tree. Islands serving a double row of parking shall have two trees. A minimum of one 3" caliper tree per 1500 square feet of asphalt (including driveways connecting from the loop road) is required per City Ordinance. 9. Streets and Circulation: Staff agrees with the proposed stub road (Gala Street) to the east, unplatted property. As stated in the Preliminary Plat comments, we recommend access be provided internally with a connection between Sites "A" and `B". There is a conflict between the Concept Plan and Plat for the Seminary site. The plat proposes a flag lot for Lot 4, Block 1 (the proposed 19,648 s.f. office building), with the flag serving as the driveway. However, the Concept Plan shows the seminary utilizing the flag driveway, not the office. Staff does not disagree with the design, but it should be noted for future cross access agreements. 10. Signage: The Applicant submitted a letter from Idaho Electric Signs regarding signage for the apartment complex and a letter from Patrick McKeegan outlining intent for the ice arena signage. The monument signs shall not exceed 70 s.f. All signage throughout the PD -C shall be coordinated and complement building materials and themes. This applies to all future buildings. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00.017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza.AZ.RZ,PRCUP.doc Mayor, Council and P& March 20, 2000 Page 10 11. Storage Areas: Per Ordinance 12-6-8.A.1, Storage areas shall be provided for the anticipated needs of boats, campers, motorhomes, and trailers. No such areas are designated on the Site Plan. Applicant shall either provide a storage area adequate to serve every two (2) living units or provide evidence that storage needs can be met through an alternative method. 12. Maintenance Building: A maintenance building or approved area shall be provided that is suitable for the services required for the repair and maintenance of all common areas as per Section 9-607.H.3. 13. Trash Enclosures: No trash enclosures are shown on the Conceptual Site Plan. Staff recommends all such areas be situated outside of view from either Overland or Locust Grove Roads. Applicant shall coordinate locations and construction requirements of the required trash enclosures with Meridian Sanitary Service, Inc., and provide a letter of approval from their office when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. 14. Hours of Operation: No details of hours of operation are provided. For the future CUP applications, all office and retail uses should be harmonious with the apartment complex and residential homes to the west. 15. Alternative Transportation Options: At build -out, this site will serve as a principal center of employment for the east Meridian/west Boise area. While Boise Urban Stages does not currently service Overland Road, it has the potential to be a likely destination point for mass transit in the future. Staff strongly recommends an area be designated and/or preserved on the Concept Plan for a future bus stop. We also recommend the inclusion of bicycle racks at all office and retail buildings and the ice hockey arena. 16. All conditions placed on this application shall run with the land and shall not lapse or be waived as the result of any change in tenancy or ownership of any or all of the lands governed by this CUP application. All such conditions shall be deemed the requirements for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any use or structure as per City Ordinance. 17. Applicant shall utilize the Ada County Highway District design standards for the private street within this development, with the exception of width requirements. Street designs shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Meridian Public Works Department. PD -C Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the concept plan with the above conditions. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z�' March 20, 2000 Page 11 rte, CUP (APARTMENT COMPLEX) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-017) 1. All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site "B" (apartment complex) shall be incorporated here. 2. The Applicant is proposing to construct the complex in two (2) phases, with the first phase consisting of approximately 140 units and the clubhouse. Staff recommends the number of units constructed in phase 1 be limited to a maximum of thirty (30) dwelling units and that no more units be granted occupancy until Overland Road capacity is improved. Overland Road between Locust Grove and Eagle Road is currently a two-lane, non - signalized arterial. Numerous traffic concerns have been entered into the public record regarding the capacity of both Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. Traffic was cited as one of the principal reasons for the City's denial of the proposed Sundance Apartments at the NW corner of Locust Grove Road and Overland Road last Fall. Dobie Engineering's traffic study lists Overland Road (east of Locust Grove Road) as having 11,230 vehicles/day in 7/98. Over the past twenty (20) months, this figure has certainly increased; especially factoring in the new homes built in Sherbrooke Hollows to the south. Dobie's study estimates 1,170 new trips/day to be generated by the apartment complex and 335 new trips/day generated by the ice arena. The study also projects a Level of Service "F" for the left -turn outs from all three Overland Road driveways until signals are installed. The study further assumes the high school, potentially slated for construction in 2001 (which is the same year as the apartment complex), will generate 3,000 trips/day and 250 peak hour trips. Overland Road is designated in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as a 5 -lane arterial with bike lanes to be constructed in 2005. Staff believes that limiting new development on the subject site, to the Ice Arena and thirty (30) apartments would facilitate a smoother transition for the neighborhoods and ease the impact on Overland Road until such time as it is widened and signalized. 3. All applicable Fair Housing and ADA requirements for multi -family housing must be met, including accessibility design for the ground floor units. Handicap parking shall be provided to serve the Clubhouse. CUP (Apartments) Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the condition that only the clubhouse and thirty (30) dwelling units receive occupancy until Overland Road is improved. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. CUP ("THE POND" ICE ARENA) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-015) All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site "C" (ice arena) shall be incorporated here. 2. A minimum of seven (7) handicap accessible spaces must be provided to directly serve this AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ. PP. CUP.doc � Mayor, Council and P&Zr March 20, 2000 Page 12 facility. Only two (2) are shown. Revise site plan accordingly. CUP (Ice Arena) Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS The 1993 Comprehensive Plan contains a variety of goals and policies relevant to this application. The following sections most directly apply to the proposed project and are repeated here for the Council and Commission's consideration during the hearing process. Goal 3 is "to encourage the kind of economic growth and development which supplies employment and economic self-sufficiency for existing and future residents, reduces the present reliance on Boise and strengthens the City's ability to finance and implement public improvements, services, and its open space character." Goal 4 is "to provide housing opportunities for all economic groups within the community." Goal 8 is "to establish compatible and efficient use of land through the use of innovative and functional site design." Economic Development 1.1 The City of Meridian shall make every effort to create a positive atmosphere that encourages... commercial enterprises to locate in Meridian. 1.3 The character, site improvements and type of new commercial or industrial developments should be harmonized with the natural environment and respect the unique needs and features of each area. Land Use I AU Encourage new development that reinforces the City's present development pattern of higher density development within the Old Town area and lower density development in outlying areas. 1.8U Promote the development of high-quality and environmentally compatible residential areas that contain the necessary parks, schools and commercial facilities to maintain and form identifiable neighborhoods. 2.1 U Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi -family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities. 2.2U Support strategies for the development of neighborhood parks within all residential areas. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ,PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 13 2.3U Protect and maintain residential neighborhood property values, improve each neighborhood's physical condition and enhance its quality of life for residents. 4.8U Encourage commercial uses, offices and medical -care uses to locate in the Old Town district, business parks, shopping centers and near high-intensity activity areas, such as freeway interchanges. 6.8U New urban density subdivisions which abut or are proximal to existing rural residential land uses shall provide screening and transitional densities with larger, more comparable lot sizes to buffer the interface between the urban level densities and rural residential densities. Transportation 1.4U Monitor and coordinate the compatibility of theland use and transportation system. 1.20U Encourage proper design of residential neighborhoods to ensure their safety and tranquility. Open Space, Parks and Recreation 2.5U New subdivision development... will be considered as opportunities to ... encourage the development of recreational open spaces and parks as part of new planned developments. Housing 1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide diversity of housing types ... in a variety of locations suitable for residential development. 1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping centers shall be encouraged. 1.6 Housing proposals shall be phased with transportation, open space and public service and facility plans, which will maximize benefits to the residents, minimize conflicts and provide a tie-in between new residential areas and service needs. 1.19 High-density development, where possible, should be located near open space corridors or other permanent major open space and park facilities, and near major access thoroughfares. Community Design 5.2 Ensure that all new development enhances rather than detracts from the visual quality of its surroundings, especially in areas of prominent visibility. 6.5U Establish land -use designations that reflect the character of existing neighborhoods. AZ -00-004, U-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza.AZ.RZ. PR CUP. doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 14 6.11 U Promote well-planned and well -designated affordable housing in all Meridian neighborhoods. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ. PP. CUP. doe BR/GGS /nom _^ 1800 West Overland Road ENG*ffF%ZS / PLANNERS / $UWEY0M Boise, Idaho 83705 — 3142 Voice (208) 344-9700 Fax (208) 345-2950 E-mail briggs@micron.net March 22, 2000 Mr. Brad Hawkins -Clark Mr. Bruce Freckleton City of Meridian 200 L. Carlton, Suite 201 Meridian, Tdaho 83642 KE CE TV7 MAR 2 2 '2900 CITY OF 1i !Z,1DLA2N Re: Resolution Plaza. (Annexation, Rezone, Preliminary Plat, PUD & Conditional Use Applications) Dear Brad and Bruce: This letter is in response to staff comments dated March 20, 2000 General Comments : 1. We are in agreement. 2. The phasing information is correct. 3. The School District information is correct. 4. We would like more detailed information on transportation management plans. General Requirements : l . Internal irrigation and drainage ditches will be piped. The Hunter Lateral adjoining the west boundary of the Voigt property will be piped. The section of the adjoining Hunter Lateral which abuts the Meridian School District property will be the responsibility of the District if piping is required for Lot 1, Block 1. 2. A septic system and two wells presently exist on the property. The septic system and residential well will be removed per City Ordinance. The second well was used for agricultural purposes. We are exploring the possible use of the well as a secondary pressure irrigation source. 3. The applicant will comply. 4. The applicant wi I I comply. 5. The applicant will provide a drainage plan. A drainage ditch traverses the subject property. The ditch receives nun -off from the property. We may explore approval to discharge; the pre - development (low. 6. The applicant wi 1I comply. 7. The applicant will comply. 8. The applicant will comply. 9. The applicant will comply. 0 10 1 \CityMer Hawkins -Clark R.esponse.Irr MAR 22 100 12:24 12083452950 PAGE.02 Annexation and Zoning Requirements: (File AZ -00-004) 1. Acceptable. 2. Staffs recommendation for Neighborhood Commercial (CN) zoning is acceptable since the anticipated uses would be allowed within the CN designation. 3. We are in agreement. 4. The applicant will comply and enter into a development agreement. Rezone Requirements :(File R2-00-003) 1. We are in agreement. 2. We are in agreement. 3. We are in agreement. 4. The applicant will comply and enter into a development agreement. Preliminary plat General Comments: (File PP -00-006) 1. The subdivision name Resolution Subdivision has been approved by the Ada County Engineer. The Street Name Committee has reviewed the proposed street name and has issued an evaluation and approval. 2. The applicant will comply. 3. The applicant will comply. Preliminary Plat Requirements: (File PP -00-006) 1. The applicant will comply. 2. The applicant will comply. 3. The applicant will comply. 4. The applicant will provide pressure irrigation to all lots with the exception of Lot 1, Block 1 (Meridian School District lot). We have contacted the School District concerning participation in a joint pump station. However, if the District believes financial participation is premature, since their irrigation needs are unknown at this time. We will proceed with an independent station. 5. The applicant intends to design and construct the pressure irrigation facilities to Nampa Meridian Irrigation District Standards. The system will be owned and maintained by Nampa Meridian Irrigation District with approval by the District Board. An agricultural well exists on the G. L. Voigt parcel. The well was historically used for a dairy. We intend to utilize the well as a secondary source ifapproval from Tdaho Department of Water Resources can be obtained. 6. 'The applicant will delineate the NMID casement for the Hunter Lateral on the plat. No other irrigation easements exist on the subject properties. 7. The applicant will comply. 8. The applicant intends to provide landscape easements along Locust Grove and Overland Roads. An :association will be formed to govern perimeter landscaping. 0. The applicant will comply. 0101\CityMer Hawkins -Clark Response.ltn- MAR 22 '00 12:25 12083452950 PAGE.03 10,11, 10-14, 10. The developer of the apartment complex believes a fence along their western boundary is necessary as a buffer and for security purposes. Interconnection can be accomplished with pedestrian pathways and (1) vehicular connection as requested in Condition No. 11. The applicant will pipe the Hunter Lateral as requested by staff. 11. A vehicular connection between Site A & B could be accomplished from the driveway between building 7 & 8. If the daycare building size were reduced and the driveway angles north to intersect_just above the traffic circle. 12. The applicant will comply. 13. The private road functions as a joint private access between Lot 8 & 6, Block l and Millennium Way. This access could be accomplished with an easement or cross access agreement for a driveway. The applicant did not intend the driveway to be constructed with curbs, gutter and sidewalk. CUP (PUD/Commercial) Requirements: (File CUP -00-017) 1. The applicant understands. 2. The applicant understands the approval is conceptual and future uses will require site specific conditional use approval. The staff and commission must understand the term conceptual. Final development plans will most likely reflect minor deviations from the concept. 3. The applicant is in agreement. 4. The applicant will comply with the requirements of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance as follows: Sections 12-6-4, 12-6-6, 12-6-7 & 12-6-8-B. The applicant disagrees with the requirements of Section 12-6-8-A (1, 2 & 3). (1) The multi -family project applicant indicates the parking of any type of recreational vehicle will be prohibited. Any resident with RV's will need to store the vehicles at a public storage facility offsite. Therefore, there is no necessity to provide a storage area. (2) The applicant opposes the recommendation to provide one additional parking space for every three dwelling units in addition to the required 2 spaces per dweling unit. This section is not a mandate since it refers to the word "may" not shall or should. The applicant for the apartment complex has provided two (2) parking spaces per dwelling unit as specified in Section 11-13-15-B of the Meridian Ordinance. The standard of two spaces per unit is universal in most jurisdictions. The applicant has also provided attached garages which enhances the aesthetics of the project with less hard surface areas. Driveways (tandem parking) to the garages provides additional parking for guests. (3) No maintenance building is proposed with the multi -family or commercial project. The applicants intend to contract with a landscape company for maintenance of common areas and landscaping. Therefore, this requirement should 0101\CiryMer Hawkins -Clark Response.ltr MAR 22 '00 12:25 12083452950 PAGE.04 r 1..., be deleted. 5. A colored site/landscapc plan and multiple colored elevations of proposed structures was submitted with the applications. The applicants will need specifics concerning additional information required under Section 12-6-4. It is the applicant's belief that Section 12-6-4 has been satisfied. 6. The applicant is in agreement. 7. The applicant disagrees with the parking requirement of Site B (Apartment Complex). Staff indicates a requirement of 2.3 spaces/dwelling unit. The Ordinance mandates (2) spaces/du. Staff has never required parking in excess of 2/unit on any previous applications processed by Briggs Engineering. I believe this recommendation is excessive and adds to paved areas at the expense of landscaping/common areas. The Ordinance does not mandate anything beyond (2) spaces/unit. The parking required condition should he revised to reflect "400". The Apartment Complex was designed with 401 parking spaces (garages and open parking) to meet the Ordinance requirement of 2 spaces/unit. The tandem parking (driveways in front of attached garages) was considered excess, yet was referenced on the site plan. Mr. McKeegan, the architect for the Ice Arena believes the parking provided (278 spaces) will be under utilized most of the time. (See Mr. McKeegan's letter attached.) Customers of the rink will have the ability to park in adjoining lots during heavy peak hours for the rink. We believe a minor amount of over—flow parking is reasonable. Please refer to the letter from Patrick McKeegan dated March 21, 2000 for additional information on the Ice Arena's parking needs and hours of operation. The applicant will revise the site plan and remove the three rows of parking stalls which back directly into the access driveways on Site A. S. The applicant will comply with landscaping requirements for parking lots. 9. The applicant is in agreement and will delineate the necessary cross access easements on the final plat for lots which may share private access driveways. 10. The applicant will comply. 11. The applicant for the Apartment Complex will prohibit the parking of recreational vehicles within the complex. 12. The maintenance of common areas will be contracted with a lawn care company. Therefore, there is no practical need for a maintenance building for any of the proposed developments. 1 ). A site plan was sent to Meridian Sanitary Services for their review and comment. A meeting has been scheduled with Bill Gregory, Meridian Sanitary Services on March 22. 2000 to obtain recommendations for trash enclosure locations. The applicant will comply. 14. See letter from Patrick McKeegan concerning hours of operation for the Ice Arena. We agree that hours of operation are important in order to coexist with existing residential development and the proposed multi -family developnZcnt. 15. An easement for a possible future bus stop could be provided on the plat. 010I\CityMer Hawkins -Clark Response.ltr MAR 22 '00 12:26 12083452950 PAGE.05 R/GGS /NEER/ ' enc. 1800 W. Overland Road —Boise, Idaho 83 tub — zUa i44 -y ry The inclusion ol'bicycle racks within the development is acceptable. 16. The applicant is in agreement. 17. The applicant proposes the Y2K Lane as a private driveway. The applicant does not intend to construct this as a public street with curb, gutter and sidewalk CUP (Apartment Com)lex) Requirements: (File CUP -00-017) The applicant agrees, with the exception of those conditions which we have documented our opposition. The applicant disagrees with the limitation of the apartment complex to 30 units. it is not economically feasible to construct the necessary infrastructure (Le. clubhouse, pool, sewer, water, roadways & parking) to accommodate 30 units. (See letter from Desert West, LLC.) It is our desire to encourage ACT IT) to consider a private/public effort to improve Overland Road. The applicant will comply with ADA requirements. CUP ("The Pond" Ice Arena) Requirements• (File CUP -00-015) 1. The applicant agrees with the exception of those conditions which we have documented Opposition. 2. The applicant will comply. (See Patrick McKeegan's letter dated March 21. 2000.) Sincerely, BRIG S ENGINEERI G, T Bee L. Bowcutt I.and Use Planner BLB:fc 0101\CityMer Hawkins -Clark Response.ltr MAR 22 '00 12:26 12083452950 PAGE.06 ga ick WKeegan Architects 419 S. 8m Street, Suite 13 Boise, Idaho 83702-7157 208.424.8608 Fax 208.424.8609 www.mckeeganarch.com March 21, 2000 Becky Bowcutt Briggs Engineering 1800 W. Overland road Boise, ID 83705 Re: Pond Ice Arena CUP Report Response Project No. 99052 Dear Becky. I have reviewed Meridian's comments and am pleased with the positive response. My response to their comments on the Ice Facility follows. For clarity I have indicated the City's page and paragraph number. Page 3, Item 4: Transportation Management Plan. We support the concept and would participate in a development wide plan. Page 3, Item 5: Drainage. Will there be a development wide drainage plan or will we be required to maintain all drainage on our parcel? Our civil engineer has indicated that we can accommodate our drainage runoff on our parcel. Page 4, Item 2: C -N zoning. I assume that since staff has not stated the Ice Rink use is not allowed in the GN zoning that it is. We have no problem with the designation for our use. Page 5, Item 4 and Page 6 Item 5: Pressurized irrigation system. Will this be a development wide system or will each parcel be responsible for its needs? Page 5, Item 9: Perimeter fencing. Will the fencing be installed by the development or are we responsible for the portion abutting our proposed lot? Page 7 Item 2: Conceptual approval only. It was Mr. Smith's understanding that our application was for CU approval of our project also. When is the earliest we could apply for our CU? Page 8, Item 5. Colored rendering. I thought we furnished one with our previous package to you. I have enclosed another for this submission. r1AP-? t --nn�a 15 = 45 208 424 8509 P. 0 t MAR 22 '00 12:2? 12083452950 PAGE.O? Page 9, Item 7: Additional detail on operations. Mr, smith has conducted focus groups to determine the feasibility for this facility and what the communities needs are for ice related recreation. He is also actively involved in the local recreational hockey leagues. Much of the information is proprietary business information but I can summarized our plans as follows: There is a need in the area for additional ice facilities. Ice World is currently running at full capacity and cannot support the current need or anticipated growth in hockey. Many of the adult participants work non-traditional hours because of the nature of the major employers (Micron, HP, etc.) running multiple shifts. There is a need for a facility that will provide around the clock ice facititles. Our facility will be open 24 hours but except for a few peak periods during the day will not require anywhere near the parking that is being requested. For example if both sheets were being used by four teams there would be approximately 64 persons on the ice. During open recreational skating there might be as many as 100 persons on one or both sheets. Open recreational skating will be scheduled after school and during the early evenings when the sheets are not scheduled for practice. The majority of the time the ice will be scheduled by teams (16 players plus coaches) for practice on a rotating basis. We anticipate once a month having tournaments or other events that would require the full parking count. These would usually occur during the weekend or evenings when the office parking would not be used. We believe the parking we have provided will be underutilized most of the time and that the shared use for the additional 8 seats is reasonable. We had hoped the City would allow more shared parking so the total development parking lots would not need to be so large. Page 10, Item 15: Bicycle racks. They will be provided at our facility. Page 11, Item 2. HC parking spaces. 5 additional HC parking spaces will be designated. If you have any questions, or need more information, please call. Sincerely. Patrick McKeegan Architects /Patrick Mc gan Principal Architect MAR -21-2000 15:46 20e 424 8609 P_22 MAR 22 '00 12:27 12063452950 PAGE.08 Desert West Properties, LLC 3/21/00 Planning & Zoning Commission / Mayor & City Council City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Ccammcnts on the submittal review comments for the 200 unit Luxury Apartment Complex by Desert West Properties, LLC Dear, Commission and council With regard to conditions proposed M the March 20`h 2000 review of our application for a Conditional Use Permit (File CUP -00-015) We would like to address the items that pertain to the 200 Unit Luxury Apartment complex. Preliminary Plat Requirements (File PP -00-006) Item 10: It is the preference of the applicant to pipe the hunter lateral as well as construct the 6' fence. It is our opinion that the perimeter fence is necessary to maintain the level of security and cleanliness that our clientele will expect from a facility of this caliber. We ask the City council to allow us to provide this important amenity. Thank you. Itcm 11: The applicant would be agreeable to this condition provided that we are able to limit the traffic into the complex to residents only, thereby protecting the project from drive threw traffic that would be detrimental to the peace and tranquility of our secured environment. CUP (PUD/Commercial) Requirements (Pile CUP -00-017) Item 7: The applicant believes that there has been an error in the calculation of the requircd parking. When the tandem parking spaccs are deducted from the total of the proposed parking, 401 spaces remain. It is our understanding that these are 2 stalls required for each of the 200 units equaling 400 stalls. Item 8: It is our intent to comply with this request fully. Item 11: It is the intent of the applicant to restrict parking to automobiles and light duty trucks able to fit into one stall. Storage of boats, campers, motorhomes, trailers and vehicles that are inoperable or not used regularly will not be allowed and the owuci• will be rcquired to secure suitable storage elsewhere. NPP -22-2000 e8 : 75 2088989527 I P.02 MAR 22 '00 12:28 12083452950 PAGE.09 Item 12: The applicant will be subcorrtracting maintenance and grounds keeping to a qualified professional. Item 13: the applicant intends to conform to this request in hill. CUP (Apartment Complex) requirements (File CUP -00-017) Item 2: The applicant has concluded that it is not economically feasible to limit the number of units that can be built in phase I, and requests that the council delete such a requirement, as it would interfere with the ability of the business to be profitable. We arc aware of the traffic problem on Overland road, however, it is our belief that by developing thus site fully and paying the ACRD impact fees we will be closer to funding The expansion than if development is drawn out and funding is not as available. In addition, the l P 2 70 trips per day estimated by Dobie Engineering is somewhat insignificant when compared to the traffic generated by the High school and other commercial enterprises. We appreciate responsibility that you bear and thank you for the service you render in behalf of this community. Sincerely, The Principles of Desert West Property LLC Ocscn Wcsr ProPotes. LLC, PO Dox 1030 Mendip, Who 83642 x208) 898-0800 F". (208) 098.9527 MAR -22-2000 08:35 _US898952" 9:7%: f = �3 MAR 22 '00 12:28 TOTAL P.10 12083452950 PAGE.10 r-. Ep1GINEERING CBRIGGS ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL COMPANY FAX .� /. DATE -3 - z2- cz�) NO. OF PAGES SENT Z (Including Transmittal) REMARKS REPLY REQUESTED COPY FROM 117 Lo BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD BOISE, IDAHO 83705 FAX (208) 345-2950 * TEL (208) 344-9700 (BEI) PROJECT NO. ai 01 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD * BOISE, IDAHO 83705 * (208)344-9700 FAX (208)345-29`. MAR 22 '00 12:24 12083452950 PAGE.01 MAYOR Robert D. Corrie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tammy deWeerd Cherie McCandless MEMORANDUM: � HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY .-. A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 To: Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council From: Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Technician? ,— Brad Hawkins -Clark, Planner34r_ Christy Richardson, Planner LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208)887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 March 20, 2000 gE� CED MAR 2 0 2000 City of Meridian City Clerk Offic^ Re: - Request for a Annexation and Zoning of 16.1 Acres from R -T to C -G by Overland, L.L.C. (File AZ -00-004) - Rezone of 37.6 Acres from R-4 to L -O by G.L. Voigt (File RZ-00-003) - Preliminary Plat of 107.06 Acres by G.L. Voigt (File PP -00-006) - Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Commercial Development (RESOLUTION PLAZA) consisting of Multi -Family, Commercial, Office and LDS Seminary in the proposed L -O and C -G Zones (File CUP -00-017) - Conditional Use Permit for a 200 Unit Luxury Apartment Complex by Desert West Properties, L.L.C. (File CUP -00-015) - Conditional Use Permit for a 86,160 Square Foot Ice Arena by Pat McKeegan (File CUP -00-016) We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATIONS SUMMARY There are six (6) separate applications covered in this report, each addressed separately after the summary. Five of the applications are associated with two parcels and propose a Planned Commercial Development (PD -C), generally located at the SE corner of Overland and South Locust Grove Roads. The sixth application (preliminary plat) also includes a 55 -acre parcel to the south of the PD -C owned by the Meridian School District and site of a future high school. The PD -C proposed uses include retail, office, an LDS Seminary, a 1,430 -seat ice hockey arena (two rinks), a daycare and a 200 -unit luxury apartment complex. The annexation application applies only to the 16 -acre parcel west of the Hunter Lateral. The rezone application applies only to the 37.64 -acre parcel south of Overland and east of the Hunter. Since ACHD has not yet submitted a report on the Preliminary Plat or three (3) CUP applications, Staff is recommending these four (4) applications be continued or tabled. Resolution Plaza.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Mayor, Council and P&� March 20, 2000 Page 2 LOCATION The property is generally located at the SE corner of Overland Road and South Locust Grove Road with approximately %2 mile of frontage along Overland. The future high school parcel is currently land -locked and directly south of the 36 -acre parcel. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North — R.V. park, Cesco (John Deere), Transport, Truck & Trailers, future location of Treasure Valley Music, and two vacant parcels. All are zoned C -G (Meridian). South — An LDS church is currently being constructed on the Ada County parcel immediately south of the Overland, LLC parcel fronting on Locust Grove. Rim View Subdivision, zoned R1 in Ada County, is south of the church. Raven Hill and Los Alamitos Subdivision, zoned R4 (Meridian), lie south of the school parcel. East — Several large, vacant parcels currently in agricultural use are east of the subject parcels. All are zoned RT (Ada County). West — Several phases of Sportsman Pointe Subdivision, zoned R4, lies across Locust Grove Road to the west. There is also an unplatted, triangular shaped parcel at the SW corner of the intersection that is not in City limits, zoned RT (Ada Co.), with a single family residence. CURRENT OWNERS OF RECORD Gary L. Voigt is the property owner of the 37.6 acre parcel. Craig Groves and Greg Johnson (Overland LLC) are the owners of the 16.1 acre parcel. Meridian Joint School District No. 2 is the owner of the 55 acre parcel. All owners have submitted consent to be a part of these applications. GENERAL COMMENTS/OVERVIEW (All Applications) 1. The 1993 Meridian Comprehensive Plan was amended by Resolution #266 (File CPA -99- 005) for the Voigt and Overland LLC parcels from Single Family Residential to Mixed/Planned Use Development on 11-16-99 by action of the City Council. Under the amended Mixed Use designation, the proposed uses are permitted. 2. The applicant has proposed a tentative phasing plan consisting of four levels of priority: Phase I - Ice Hockey Facility (Construction anticipated in year 2000) Phase Il - Apartment Complex Site `B" (Construction anticipated in year 2001) Phase III - Office/Retail Site "C" (Schedule dependent on tenant sales) Phase IV - Commercial/Office Site "A" (Applicant anticipates that this corner will not develop until the Locust Grove overpass is constructed.) NOTE: The Final Plat must be recorded prior to issuance of any building permits or Certificates of Zoning Compliance. 3. The Meridian School District will be a party to the preliminary plat at the City's request. The Meridian School District does not support nor oppose the Resolution Plaza project. It should be noted that the School District plans a High School on their 54.99 acre site. Development of the school site is contingent on a bond issue. The school district has indicated that a bond AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00.015 Resolution Pl=.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&-t� March 20, 2000 Page 3 issue for the high school will be submitted for a vote in the fall of 2000. If approved, construction of the school will take place in 2001. 4. On July 19, 1999, the APA (COMPASS) Board of Directors moved the proposed Locust Grove/I-84 overpass from the Destination 2020 Plan (soft projection) to the Transportation Improvement Plan (hard planning document). APA projects a dramatic increase in traffic for South Locust Grove when the overpass is constructed and they support a transportation management plan be developed for this project to coordinate the commuter needs of future residents and employees. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (All Applications) 1. Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for non- domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements. 4. Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 5. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 6. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section. 7. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 8. Provide five -foot -wide sidewalks in accordance.with City Ordinance. 9. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ.PP. CUP. doe Mayor, Council and P&J March 20, 2000 Page 4 ,o-. ANNEXATION & ZONING REQUIREMENTS (File AZ -00-004) 1. The legal description submitted in the application appears to meet the requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission. The parcel is contiguous to the existing corporate city limits of Meridian. 2. Staff agrees with the Applicant's forecast that the Overland/Locust Grove area will become a major intersection, especially with the construction of the I-84/Locust Grove overpass. Staff also agrees that neighborhood commercial services are needed in this area to service the existing residential subdivisions and proposed apartment complex residents. However, we do not support the proposed C -G zone. Staff recommends a lower -intensity commercial zone Neighborhood Commercial (C -N). All of the proposed uses listed in item #10 of the application (retail,, day care, and office) are permitted either outright or with a CUP in both the C -N and C -G. But there are several uses permitted in the C -G that are prohibited in the C -N, including auto repair, service stations, hotels, truck stops, heavy equipment sales and auto sales lots. Given the previously stated concerns of the Sportsman Pointe and Los Alamitos residents and the increased number of children in the apartment complex, Staff feel the down -zoned C -N is a more appropriate zone and will adequately meet the development intentions of the Applicant. 3. The subject lots can be adequately served by public facilities, and the proposed uses will allow for orderly expansion of the city limits. 4. A Development Agreement will be required as a condition of annexation Annexation Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the annexation but denial of the requested C -G zone. We recommend C -N zoning. REZONE REQUIREMENTS (File RZ-00-003) 1. The legal description submitted in the application appears to meet the requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission. 2. Staff agrees with the proposed Limited Office (L -O) zone. It is the most appropriate zone for the proposed mixed uses within the Planned Development. 3. The subject lot can be adequately served by public facilities, and the proposed uses will allow for orderly expansion of the city limits. 4. A Development Agreement will be required as a condition of rezone. Rezone Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the rezone with the requested L -O zone. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza .AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z� March 20, 2000 Page 5 PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL COMMENTS (File PP -00-006) 1. Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 2. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 3. Assessment fees for water and sewer service are determined during the building plan review process. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Re -Assessment Agreement with the City of Meridian for all commercial uses. An assessment agreement is a vehicle that protects the City of Meridian and the Developer in the event that estimated assessments are not in line with actual usages. The agreement provides for reimbursement to the developer for over payment of assessments and payment to the City of Meridian of any shortfall in assessments. The overpayment/shortfall is determined after adequate historical usage. PRLIMINARY PLAT REQUIREMENTS (File PP -00-006) Sanitary sewer service to this site will be via extensions from the Five Mile Trunk that is currently under construction by this applicant. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline. 2. Water service to this site will be via extensions from newly constructed mains under the interstate, and from extensions of existing mains installed in adjacent developments. Applicant will be responsible to construct the water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Please provide the Public works department with information on anticipated fire flow and domestic water requirements for the proposed site. Water service to this development is contingent upon positive results from a hydraulic analysis by our computer model. Flow and pressure from the existing mains should be monitored with the Meridian Water Department. 3. Two -hundred -fifty- and 100 -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 4. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on site. Please submit hook-up and design details based on the proposed landscaping. Due to the size of landscaped area, primary water supply connection to the City's mains will not be allowed. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP,CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&''0` March 20, 2000 Page 6 5. Applicant has not indicated whether the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and maintained by an association or the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. If the system is being proposed as a private system, plans and specifications for the irrigation system shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department as part of the development planreview process. A draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system O&M manual must be submitted prior to plan approval. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area. 6. Show all existing easements for irrigation/drainage facilities located within the boundaries of this proposed development (i.e. Hunter Lateral easements). 7. Detailed landscape plans for the Overland Road and Locust Grove Road landscape frontage buffers and for street landscaping along Millenium Way and Celebration Avenue shall be submitted for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat application. This requirement does not include interior lot landscaping. Interior landscaping will be dealt with on a site by site review basis with future CUP applications. A letter of credit or cash surety will be required for the improvements prior to signature on the Final Plat. Staff recommends the Overland and Locust Road landscape buffers be platted as separate common lots within the subdivision and maintenance be the responsibility of the Development Committee/Association. The draft CC&Rs submitted with the application states each separate lot owner in the subdivision will be responsible for construction, installation and maintenance of landscaping on each building site. By placing responsibility for the arterial landscape buffers with a single entity (the Association), greater consistency of design and maintenance may be achieved. At a minimum, the landscape buffers shall be placed within a permanent landscape easement designated as such on the plat. No easements are currently shown. 9. Six -foot -high, permanent perimeter fencing shall be required along the eastern boundary of Lot 1, Block 3, and Lot 2, Block 1, and along the southern boundary of Lot 15 & 16, Block 1. Submit detailed fencing plans for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat. All required fencing is to be in place prior to issuance of building permits. 10. The Applicant is proposing to construct a fence along the east boundary of the Hunter Lateral. Staff recommends the Lateral be piped and no fence constructed. Given the close proximity of the proposed 200 unit apartment complex, High School, and Daycare, staff recommends the applicant be required to comply with Ord. 12-4-13 (Piping of AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plan. AZ.RZ.PP,CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 7 Ditches). The City required the developers of Raven Hill and Los Alamitos subdivisions (upstream from subject site) to tile the Hunter and see no reason this site should receive an exemption from the piping ordinance. 11. Applicant shall provide a vehicular access across the Hunter Lateral from the proposed apartment complex (Site `B") to the proposed Office/Retail area (Site "A"). The purpose of this connection is to minimize the vehicular impact on Overland Road and to provide an internal connection to the Daycare and Retail sites. The Transportation Impact Study submitted by Dobie Engineering, Inc. assumed 20% of the office and day care traffic would be captured within the complex. However, this capturing cannot take place unless an internal access road is provided. If a connection is not provided across the Hunter, an additional 20% of vehicle trips would be added to Overland Road (based on Dobie's estimations). 12. Applicant has provided the minimum required 35 feet of landscape buffer along Overland Road, an entryway corridor. Staff agrees. They show 25 feet of landscape buffer along Locust Grove Road (including the 5 foot wide detached sidewalk). Since Locust Grove is not listed as an entryway corridor, Staff supports the 25 -foot buffer width for this arterial. At a minimum, the Overland Road landscape buffer must be completed from the eastern property boundary to 30 feet west of Millenium Way prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy for any building within the subdivision. 13. Applicant is proposing a 30 -foot wide private road (Y2K Lane) to serve Lot 6 and 8, Block 1. Applicant should explain the purpose for the private classification and whether or not sidewalks will be provided. All private roads must approved by the City Council. Staff questions the intent of the private classification, particularly when this will be the first drive providing access into the site for eastbound traffic on Overland and will likely be heavily used. If approved, Staff recommends 5 -foot sidewalks be provided on at least one (1) side of the road. Preliminary Plat Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions: a) additional fencing is provided, b) the Hunter Lateral is tiled, c) provide a single vehicular connection across the Hunter Lateral, and d) landscaping is provided and constructed per item #12. Until the City receives a copy of the ACHD report, the public hearing should be continued. CUP (PUD/COMMERCIAL) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-017) 1. As part of a conditional use permit, the City of Meridian may impose restrictions and conditions in addition to current City Ordinances. 2. This Conditional Use Permit is for the overall concept only. Future phases of the project will require separate Conditional Use Permits for each phase and each must substantially comply with the final approved Concept Plan. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc n Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 8 3. Conceptually (based upon the submitted Overall Preliminary Site Plan dated 2-01-00), staff believes the project is in accord with the purpose of Planned Developments as outlined in the Subdivision & Development Ordinance. The mixed residential, office, recreation and retail uses meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and should contribute to a reduction in traffic in this area. 4. Planned Development Regulations: As a mixed/planned use development, the Resolution Plaza development must comply with the following sections of the subdivision ordinance: 12-6-4 Procedures for Planned Developments, 12-6-6 General Regulations for Planned Development, and 12-6-7 General Standards for Planned Developments. In addition, residential areas must comply with 12-6-8-A Design Standards for Planned Development -Residential. All commercial and office uses must comply with 12-6-8-B Design Standards for Planned Development -Commercial. 5. Colored Rendering: Colored renderings of the development must be submitted prior to the City Council meeting to meet the intent of Section 12-6-4 of the PD ordinance. 6. Open Space: All Planned Developments (PD) are required to have at least 10% of the gross land area of the PD as common open space as 12-6-7-E-5. The total common open space calculation for Resolution Plaza is shown separately on Sheets 1-3 (Sites "A" — "C"). Site "A" is 4.53 acres (1.44 required), Site `B" is 5.29 acres (1.45 required), and Site "C" is 4.10 acres (1.86 required). These calculations include landscape buffers and islands. Standard practice has been that residential PD's cannot count required buffers and landscape setbacks toward the 10% open space requirement, but commercial PD's have been allowed to count it. Total gross site acreage for the Resolution Plaza project is 47.04 acres (excluding public rights-of-way). 10% open space would be 4.7 acres. The minimum amount of open space has been met. All open space delineated as common open space must meet all standards of 12-6-7-E. 7. Parking: The matrix below summarizes the total off-street parking counts for the conceptual PD -C: Site / Use Parking Proposed Parking Required Site "A" - Retail pads N of first driveway (3) 257 250 - Retail & office pads b/w driveways (2) 183 181 - Office & day care pads S of second driveway 189 100 (est.) Site "A" Total 629 531 Site "B" (Apartment complex) 553* 460 (2.3/d.u.) Site "C" - Retail & office pads on Y2K Lane (2) 156 151 AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 9 - LDS Seminar 17 20 (est.) - Office buildings S of Gala St. (2) 129 98 - Retail & office buildings N of Gala St. (2) 317 287 -Ice Arena 278 286 (115 seats) *The Applicant is proposing 152 tandem parking spaces for the complex. The P&Z Commission discouraged tandem parking for a proposed apartment complex of similar size in October 1999 (Valerie Heights). If the tandem parking is subtracted from the total parking spaces, their total provided would be 401 spaces. On the Site "A" plan, a row of parking is proposed along the south edge of the north driveway and along both the north and south edges of the south driveway with no separation. Given the likelihood of these private driveways receiving high volumes of traffic at build -out (functioning more as public roads), Staff feels this design would be unsafe and should be relocated. The first parking stalls are less than 40 feet from the property line and vehicles backing out of the stalls into the drive aisle will likely be a hazard for vehicles entering the site off Locust Grove. The proposed Ice Arena seats a total of 1,430 people. Technically, the Applicant meets City ordinance, which is based on one stall for every 5 seats. If one assumes the arena will utilize the parking north of Gala Street for evening events, an additional 317 stalls could feasibly be added to serve the arena, providing a total of 595 stalls. The Applicant should provide more detail on the hours of operation for the ice arena and their experience with other similar venues and whether or not both rinks will be used simultaneously. 8. Parking Lot Landscaping: Landscape islands serving a single row of parking shall have one tree. Islands serving a double row of parking shall have two trees. A minimum of one 3" caliper tree per 1500 square feet of asphalt (including driveways connecting from the loop road) is required per City Ordinance. 9. Streets and Circulation: Staff agrees with the proposed stub road (Gala Street) to the east, unplatted property. As stated in the Preliminary Plat comments, we recommend access be provided internally with a connection between Sites "A" and `B". There is a conflict between the Concept Plan and Plat for the Seminary site. The plat proposes a flag lot for Lot 4, Block 1 (the proposed 19,648 s.f. office building), with the flag serving as the driveway. However, the Concept Plan shows the seminary utilizing the flag driveway, not the office. Staff does not disagree with the design, but it should be noted for future cross access agreements. 10. Signage: The Applicant submitted a letter from Idaho Electric Signs regarding signage for the apartment complex and a letter from Patrick McKeegan outlining intent for the ice arena signage. The monument signs shall not exceed 70 s.f. All signage throughout the PD -C shall be coordinated and complement building materials and themes. This applies to all future buildings. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 10 11. Storage Areas: Per Ordinance 12-6-8.A.1, Storage areas shall be provided for the anticipated needs of boats, campers, motorhomes, and trailers. No such areas are designated on the Site Plan. Applicant shall either provide a storage area adequate to serve every two (2) living units or provide evidence that storage needs can be met through an alternative method. 12. Maintenance Building: A maintenance building or approved area shall be provided that is suitable for the services required for the repair and maintenance of all common areas as per Section 9-607.H.3. 13. Trash Enclosures: No trash enclosures are shown on the Conceptual Site Plan. Staff recommends all such areas be situated outside of view from either Overland or Locust Grove Roads. Applicant shall coordinate locations and construction requirements of the required trash enclosures with Meridian Sanitary Service, Inc., and provide a letter of approval from their office when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. 14. Hours of Operation: No details of hours of operation are provided. For the future CUP applications, all office and retail uses should be harmonious with the apartment complex and residential homes to the west. 15. Alternative Transportation Options: At build -out, this site will serve as a principal center of employment for the east Meridian/west Boise area. While Boise Urban Stages does not currently service Overland Road, it has the potential to be a likely destination point for mass transit in the future. Staff strongly recommends an area be designated and/or preserved on the Concept Plan for a future bus stop. We also recommend the inclusion of bicycle racks at all office and retail buildings and the ice hockey arena. 16. All conditions placed on this application shall run with the land and shall not lapse or be waived as the result of any change in tenancy or ownership of any or all of the lands governed by this CUP application. All such conditions shall be deemed the requirements for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any use or structure as per City Ordinance. 17. Applicant shall utilize the Ada County Highway District design standards for the private street within this development, with the exception of width requirements. Street designs shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Meridian Public Works Department. PD -C Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the concept plan with the above conditions. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. AZ -00-004, 122-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 11 CUP (APARTMENT COMPLEX) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-017) 1. All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site `B" (apartment complex) shall be incorporated here. 2. The Applicant is proposing to construct the complex in two (2) phases, with the first phase consisting of approximately 140 units and the clubhouse. Staff recommends the number of units constructed in phase 1 be limited to a maximum of thirty (30) dwelling units and that no more units be granted occupancy until Overland Road capacity is improved. Overland Road between Locust Grove and Eagle Road is currently a two-lane, non - signalized arterial. Numerous traffic concerns have been entered into the public record regarding the capacity of both Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. Traffic was cited as one of the principal reasons for the City's denial of the proposed Sundance Apartments at the NW corner of Locust Grove Road and Overland Road last Fall. Dobie Engineering's traffic study lists Overland Road (east of Locust Grove Road) as having 11,230 vehicles/day in 7/98. Over the past twenty (20) months, this figure has certainly increased; especially factoring in the new homes built in Sherbrooke Hollows to the south. Dobie's study estimates 1,170 new trips/day to be generated by the apartment complex and 335 new trips/day generated by the ice arena. The study also projects a Level of Service "F" for the left -turn outs from all three Overland Road driveways until signals are installed. The study further assumes the high school, potentially slated for construction in 2001 (which is the same year as the apartment complex), will generate 3,000 trips/day and 250 peak hour trips. Overland Road is designated in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as a 5 -lane arterial with bike lanes to be constructed in 2005. Staff believes that limiting new development on the subject site, to the Ice Arena and thirty (30) apartments would facilitate a smoother transition for the neighborhoods and ease the impact on Overland Road until such time as it is widened and signalized. 3. All applicable Fair Housing and ADA requirements for multi -family housing must be met, including accessibility design for the ground floor units. Handicap parking shall be provided to serve the Clubhouse. CUP (Apartments) Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the condition that only the clubhouse and thirty (30) dwelling units receive occupancy until Overland Road is improved. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. CUP ("THE POND" ICE ARENA) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-015) All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site "C" (ice arena) shall be incorporated here. 2. A minimum of seven (7) handicap accessible spaces must be provided to directly serve this AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00.006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ. PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 12 facility. Only two (2) are shown. Revise site plan accordingly. CUP (Ice Arena) Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS The 1993 Comprehensive Plan contains a variety of goals and policies relevant to this application. The following sections most directly apply to the proposed project and are repeated here for the Council and Commission's consideration during the hearing process. Goal 3 is "to encourage the kind of economic growth and development which supplies employment and economic self-sufficiency for existing and future residents, reduces the present reliance on Boise and strengthens the City's ability to finance and implement public improvements, services, and its open space character." Goal 4 is "to provide housing opportunities for all economic groups within the community." Goal 8 is "to establish compatible and efficient use of land through the use of innovative and functional site design." Economic Development 1.1 The City of Meridian shall make every effort to create a positive atmosphere that encourages... commercial enterprises to locate in Meridian. 1.3 The character, site improvements and type of new commercial or industrial developments should be harmonized with the natural environment and respect the unique needs and features of each area. Land Use 1 AU Encourage new development that reinforces the City's present development pattern of higher density development within the Old Town area and lower density development in outlying areas. 1.8U Promote the development of high-quality and environmentally compatible residential areas that contain the necessary parks, schools and commercial facilities to maintain and form identifiable neighborhoods. 2.1 U Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi -family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities. 2.2U Support strategies for the development of neighborhood parks within all residential areas. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 13 2.3U Protect and maintain residential neighborhood property values, improve each neighborhood's physical condition and enhance its quality of life for residents. 4.8U Encourage commercial uses, offices and medical -care uses to locate in the Old Town district, business parks, shopping centers and near high-intensity activity areas, such as freeway interchanges. 6.8U New urban density subdivisions which abut or are proximal to existing rural residential land uses shall provide screening and transitional densities with larger, more comparable lot sizes to buffer the interface between the urban level densities and rural residential densities. Transportation 1.4U Monitor and coordinate the compatibility of the land use and transportation system. 1.20U Encourage proper design of residential neighborhoods to ensure their safety and tranquility. Open Space, Parks and Recreation 2.5U New subdivision development... will be considered as opportunities to ... encourage the development of recreational open spaces and parks as part of new planned developments. Housing 1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide diversity of housing types... in a variety of locations suitable for residential development. 1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping centers shall be encouraged. 1.6 Housing proposals shall be phased with transportation, open space and public service and facility plans, which will maximize benefits to the residents, minimize conflicts and provide a tie-in between new residential areas and service needs. 1.19 High-density development, where possible, should be located near open space corridors or other permanent major open space and park facilities, and near major access thoroughfares. Community Design 5.2 Ensure that all new development enhances rather than detracts from the visual quality of its surroundings, especially in areas of prominent visibility. 6.5U Establish land -use designations that reflect the character of existing neighborhoods. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ.PP.CUP.doe Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 14 6.11 U Promote well-planned and well -designated affordable housing in all Meridian neighborhoods. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc 03-01-00 11:59 MERIDIAN WASTEWATER ID=2088840744 P03/04 HUB OF TREASURE VAU I EY MAYOR HUB DEPARTMENT Robert D. Corric A Good Place to Live (208) 288.Z'499 - Fay 2S8-2501 CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS BUILDING DEPARTMENT Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO (208) 887-2211 - Fax 387.1297 Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 - Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Tammy dewcerd DEP.�RTMENT Chcric McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888 4218 (208) 884.5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE- February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000 FILE NUMBER: PP -00.006 REQUEST: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF 107.06 ACRES — LO AND CG ZONING FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY- G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND LLC LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT- LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND ROADS SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED SALLY NORTON, PIZ KENT BROWN, PIZ THOMAS BARBEIRO, PIZ _RICHARD HATCHER, PIZ KEITH BORUP, P/Z ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR `RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C TAMMY de WEERD, CIC JWATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE _BUILDING DEPARTMENT _FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM & FINAL) RECEIVI-111D MAR - 1 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN MAR 01 '00 12:01 2088840744 PAGE.03 NUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT Robert D. Corrie (208) 288-2499 - Fax 288-2501 CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS BUILDING DEPARTMENT Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO (208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297 Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 '' ' +-JNNING AND ZONING Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT Cherie McCandless ry °9 1884-5533 -Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000 FILE NUMBER: PP -00-006 REQUEST: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF 107.06 ACRES – LO AND CG ZONING FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY: G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND LLC LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED) SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C _TAMMY de WEERD, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE _BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL) YOUR rONGISE REMARKS: TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To iMsure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000 FILE NUMBER: PP -00-006 REQUEST: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF 107.06 ACRES – LO AND CG ZONING FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY: G L VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED) SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C TAMMY de W EERD, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE _BUILDING DEPARTMENT _FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER R -FC -E' FEB 2 9 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: /O RECEIVED FEB 2 g 2000 Meridian City Water Superwen" HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR LEGAL DEPARTMENT Robert D. Corrie A Good Place to Live (208) 288-1_499 - Fax 288-2501 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PUBLIC WORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To iMsure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000 FILE NUMBER: PP -00-006 REQUEST: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF 107.06 ACRES – LO AND CG ZONING FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY: G L VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED) SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C TAMMY de W EERD, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE _BUILDING DEPARTMENT _FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER R -FC -E' FEB 2 9 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: /O RECEIVED FEB 2 g 2000 Meridian City Water Superwen" L M y Fi 7t � bin 5 m m L 3F LOCUST GROVE ,o v 9ZN a6 �ti M tax L L2o m S ~ r'r s IS u ?��c ry - m m o I'D v� oN z v�D cp N D Q� Zl . m o .I Z £ -P v cl JR d c l o C4 D v W z S00624'16'W rel 84915' rr m o c� H Z 'z z O C I� b D n ro n r i N fTl C d Lamm PL a mo n m D D Z ac) p Z (� W ci Z do 3 C Z o L. ❑ ❑MW --I'—' z ~ Z ❑ m w r*i tj m d : D v) z No Z (� D z N a 'n r' _ V D zQi V O) Ul W N ` o D y cr CD O. OD°i m Vcl CD o f0D y 7 CL CD c> -01Q75 CD 1 yC-D p l+ ?FDq � 3 � -�✓SD( CD y S N Q n z � N c y �l I CD 1 ❑❑❑ ❑ C CD 00.5. X Q o O� �mCD � m� Q T (D ^ mEr 0 w 1 O t n�i o p m } n � CL o_Wi m CD 3 _� m O am�o'cwccO o mQma o w (7 - 3 3 �.�c3y w oo c�c m P o' D n o' iU ( N N O CL 0D0'3 3.o � <� a OO O X a§ C w C N C - 69 C p cD CD CO C O ID N Q 3 m w (J= Od.0 mo W Z w �m a v n3. .� CL c El El 3 (7 U) 2 Om Z (O C (3D O. Oa O 4=i Q N w � = OC CD w'_ Q w' w» 3 �° a p _mmv,mD 4 .o m (D X O CD o $ a 0 03 E;* ° 3' o w (C (D CD � � 2) D c y y 7 w (p 3 T C y 0 _� O (�D N _� ca 0, m ` n Qpm CDCD (DCL 03 n °m w w (D W 3 -nom -.. m o - aaFQy° �� c(D C N•N. C. a 00 CD �• Q �� a CD a o O c 3 m' 3 w- 3 w , N (OD 7 a m a � j. N w N w d �. �a n3 w 7>o RL a m (D rn0 v w N w D O a p CTi ? W N 1 W 0o V (.J1A W N .a z z CD Dv Q c m CL W m 3 m 00 7 C y O) V m ° y Q ,r vCD CD p - C.��_ 3- Sj moo; x Q n Z C n Q O OT 3 D CD (off w 3 m J n ^ n CD \N N n � 0 m 00 ❑❑❑ El3 - j ,� C. m m -� c� ) 0ETmm� p y m x (DQ c � 'a `G A � Q (p CD 0 O y`� Q CD CD ID ❑❑❑❑ (u o- cpm `D3 0 CD CD CC a 7 n Q C CD ca�. 07 3 m —o 7 O Cl. o m c p a QuCDa UOa 17 p' Ci o 33 n_° � m C6 oo�d m 0 d- I o 7 i7 N Wc N 7 O2 Q 3 30 d m y m 0 O w O A C � C oox.�7m mm C o(D 3 Q 0 m w o 0 o c a _ j.Qj V s �' O El El m cn 0' O nm � O w D c Q N 373 O -C °o m $ o m (p 6 .1 l ° F Q _O N1N w (D 2J 7 41 J 7 (Ay (D ma .. �oxN'Dm CD y D W o y3 oox. �mo�,��. m� aamw 0 CD CD2o m a o— 2 7 m (D o m5' mw333y* m2 �Oo CDm c w m m waD ID ��'3 -n U) O -N 03�, CD Cn cCD — o Cb W o O w e CD m �. Q O (O N 7pow m CD0 O- a 3 �3om�w X W ao.yw3. 7 w m 30 0 CL y c 3 bH 7 (D A w (/ D w (D wO w J,c' 0,0 7 O G CL d (D n' N P D (D (D CO 3 r7 I 1 1 1 1 1 W N O CO 00 V cn W N 1 m o Dy w a00 °NV �. z Z tdpynCD JCD, _ n CD M '3-" CD o m p1 C',cy 0CD� �C� o ID d O m 3 ° 'o m m m (p C Q (p a ID m x O W N C O C 0 C O° � m@_ 7 w w `ty-. O W fG C_ .�. °onmQma w �m m o c N :3�.<»�mw 0 2 d 0 .2 N J O y ° � 3 �'O w O . O; 7 N X wCD mcowN 3 ID w g o c j jCL eq-: � a3a a ��j2.w a o 30cw n aom o NZ3 3 (D I D W. W"g. a� -. 69 p'nj��Dw m l N X _a ID 00 3 d 0 O 0 X. y 3 7 � 3 d 7 m"OD c _d o CL W W 3 N sj.a3 cam, w m 3 3 v Cm. 3m CD m — m' n cl .oa www. nim0 0,0 _ c , �00,ow 35' X, w Er W. 3.x co N j O a p y C 3 wE K n 7 a s w w a _ N 4 d w C N N �. Dd m m o -W w w CD o a C N y Qd O (D N e I� Oc: o ❑EI❑ ❑ 7n w CD 0W3 CD x p N N 0 ID o CL CD _� CD ❑ElEl❑ vETC� W� o CD C 3 wa R,0 p_M CD �� 3 m O D' — M. O D ' a c �rjCD ° o nG C CD a <� m w w C <D a =zo ❑❑ m 0 Uj 0 (p O m Z -7 (o �z O y 6y' O C (D C <D Q Q CD a N 37 N Q 60 X T Cl) _ CD U N n c-, a 11 a� 3 N C,) S)> (D D 2 — � Om -. m T Raj p _ CD o C x CDN. C) J N = C m p' Q O q Q mCDd 37 d n w �. z Z _ n I� Oc: o ❑EI❑ ❑ 7n w CD 0W3 CD x p N N 0 ID o CL CD _� CD ❑ElEl❑ vETC� W� o CD C 3 wa R,0 p_M CD �� 3 m O D' — M. O D ' a c �rjCD ° o nG C CD a <� m w w C <D a =zo ❑❑ m 0 Uj 0 (p O m Z -7 (o �z O y 6y' O C (D C <D Q Q CD a N 37 N Q 60 X T Cl) _ CD U N n c-, a 11 a� 3 N C,) S)> (D D 2 — � Om -. m T Raj p _ CD o C x CDN. C) J N = C m p' Q O q Q mCDd 37 d 65' 00 3 D.c W N O CO W V cn p W N -+ O D Z CD Q coo �m , ICD V m N m SD y C. m D co C� CD o I w 3 n TP cVVR ,--•�, Q � CD o 3 m �y ,� (� 1 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ c a CDa f lb m 5 0 m p E' 46 m w G` y] y .7 2- .�•. ao �m Qm n m"mom ID 0 o n N N O w3, X3 �3'Oy O p , O G - c C o �. 3 D W01 c O C N O a 167 �. a a m �7 C. 3 a o c w m 2 3 — 0 o mo om3 33' 6n' m :3w W vi ' a n � � �mbwma ID o 0 3 a 5' -0 n O % y N 3 y 3 �0 m c d�cm afo y 3 _ co c� m 9'aw ��.ac. m a 3 3 5 QCT. ym CD m _ m m amm a 'o_�� ^wpo 3. 2 p vo 5 am � 3 o'm.0 w o d,w� cx a°NNw3 am-wwm —m d N c 3 fA �. m' o� y FID o '<'o o Rlb(D.�v m CD m I On Os w m ID O p C Ica, a Q D N N N C O m a n3i j ❑ElEl❑ C CDCD 0: n�'ac �QaPa� CD = p m 3 m m v - 0 c O m i c N CD a a <� N w C N C D a �CD ❑❑ m� p m Z X• �o Da o m' QCDti m c N c CL f Q m D a CD N CD n y D 6 o 0 X -n cn WCD N Q N' -0 - Cl) W S ID pro m -. lD CD U) p 0 N. m (n CD CD 0 4 0 Q CDT m V R u � r o °a Z Ca N O OD V Uir Qc W N i ADZ W oQ m dam V 5. 10 .E V °oL - > > aye ID o m o v nrz y -- a3 0�5� 75n 0 _� CIN 0 CD CD 0 D w ^ CD_ fD C Q (Q a (D F � x 0 1 N d o N m C m a (D ogc m o' j m W N O O O p 2 O 1 C oox.�0m m 3 y o'OID 3onm m C 3 CD 0 ICDL . � C, a m o n 3�D ocm < 3 0 o m o m .�� n3 m 3 m» FS mmnom' p N a m O X _a n O 3 7 m' °ioox3 3 w co CL (a 0:3m 0m m �' 3 3 M (3D = m' M n m n m d m a 3 �a mem. o O - 0 3 I om a f3m3oj� om.�x .x cn�° mcm'3 n m 3 N m O a fD j' m m D d m m o 7 O �G n m CD N m m m 4 m m y 000 0 m d o m CCc- D o C J. CD A Cl N co 0 CL o m 3 � ID❑000 �. Dpi M O co 3 ate. am m o m ID. o' �> o a c � � 3 m m CD a n w N m C � CD a -� 00 �ID CDS O m Z"o m o c c �. m c a 0 Q CD CCD <D Al CD n o y D Q O 0 X m C ID to mn oaMw ID = O° W m H W O lD TI Lab '0 3 w m N N C CD o co a 3m T r oTCL m Ul p W N 1 1 (O 0 O W V 0) (.nA W r m a N 1 m '"G2) 00 V CD ° •m ID D v (DU) $ a N = D CD or a a ti%, oCD R CDN az O 3 SD N- w EIDE] 0:07 � n n � m n ` ` CCD X . yCD T ° a" o m m CD m CD ❑00❑ DID CD - $ `6- m 0 a W �5. 3 m Pn-M 0 CD Cl) W O C m' $ tD C CDD N O ncmmo� C" -o 2, m y 7 N m c Z _ °"'.�mcma n w o�viioon mm�oo cam' �w D) N (D N G ID or � p o w 0 7 E"7 n oox. c (D CO C Ul N N C cD CD (D W = O C a J j lo Q p Q 3 p D O N Oa jn M 7��OCd �(D E] E) N� j 9-- d C 7 O O CD Z j T. (Q N N 7 y 3 a O (n cr N y (D dy N Q (j' C Q CD O O. N- I N N T Q m 0 N X 4 CD 37 n O ° O3� 7 4b N ` SG°D°3N� mn gom> m m c 3 cn W n N. 3m, v Q o x. 7 N j'n- TC -_ .0c� (p COCD 7 (D N n N (D 0 Q N 2. Q w.��.3 o ((nD ama Cl m=Oupi NNS CD (D W � - 0 a C, D" .0 L. � cn � A3i o � CD xW CL . = W 'R z y Cn'O y C C . Q N N N 3 w ' 0 p a oa (D i= y 0) C 3 fA j , \ ) (D DECD 3 7 OG ➢l d m a 01 y a (D N S r E170� 1 .r• 1 1 -n a m Cn 1 1 G.) N ODv cn 3 a W N O D Z W OQ co ° 6".0 a (DG� V ° Q y 01 A N D Q c c Qco �. m (D o � (D °i <' Z c v a m o �CDw 0 CD m Zw m T i m 3 w m � rn n O CG, n m _a n m 0 0 m° ❑OEI0CD m m c J �1 00 S�omx cr aCDNm a W I(D o 77 ° 3 1 ` (D w CD - ED ❑ ❑ 0 ^_ _O CD CDD W 5* D c 0 1 VVV O O CD R E o 0 C1 O' -mow D D 0 (D m`m) _ 3m m 7 , 2 C O ID 5 ECL m y c N m c D » no�mQm'a -10 O d_- y (D O(D .�J w p 7 3 �.N -a,. � � < m� Cl 0 C- `- c 0 CD 3 N d 0 o N O 3.0 w 3 D � w o p o c oox. 00 < m' m0 (D n,CD.mm`� 3O m(D ° CD Oa 00 00(D D1 O (7 (D m n El El =or 3 N O C N M 0 CD Z C1 O O y C 7 0 y. O O N Q� Q R CDZ c N ' 3m! (D cD KD =c 4 a (gyp c 4 _. o EAN o --,�w �D a y o(D X Q m D N 0°033 0. S y m CD n D cD�j (n' o d (CD g�N3--n Al Q C) x' =waw 3 C)m B. a -CD CD 0 CL 3 n'.aCD c(o �9 33Fn Qn :w� m m -,za m= OvOi N CSD 0 OMS 03 aM.20.P0LD =• mo wc o CDO O ° , 3 O CD3a D .Z QOa -3 m:3 m -m-9 x. Cn (D N . afDN�w3 Df jN (D j' c' N W N N c TV D3�1 N N CD aC m 0 c m m Q m m m