The URL can be used to link to this page

Resolution Business Park CUP 00-015/Nt CITY CLERK FILE CHECKLIST Project Name: Resolution - Ice Arena File No. CUP 00-015 Date Received from Planning and Zoning Department: Planning and Zoning Level: Hearing Date: F--1 Transmittals to agencies and others: ❑ Notice to newspaper with publish dates: _ ❑ Certifieds to property owners: ❑ Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Notes: Cityy Council Level: �1 Transmittals to agencies and others: Notice to newspaper with publish dates: Certifieds to property owners: City Council Action: Notes: and Approve ❑ Deny Hearing Date: n/a June 6, 2000 15 -May -00 and 2 -Jun -00 May 22, 2000 Approve ❑ Deny Findings / Conclusions / Order received from attorney on: % L. A e (k Z0 6 () Findings / Conclusions / Order: U 1' Approved by Council: �.Y 2.�� 7 tbtj ❑" Copies Disbursed: TLt k-� 21 ❑ Findings Recorded Development Agreement: ❑ Sent for signatures: ❑ Signed by all parties: ❑ Approved by Council: ❑ Recorded: ❑ Copies Disbursed: Ordinance No. Resolution No. ❑ Approved by Council: ❑ Recorded: Deadline: 10 days ❑ Published in newspaper: ❑ Copies Disbursed: Resolutions: Original Res / Copy Cert: Minutebook Copy Res / Copy Cert: City Clerk City Engineer City Planner City Attorney Sterling Codifiers Project File COPY Res / Original Cert: Ada County (CPAs) Applicant (non -CPAs) Recorded Ordinances: Original: Minutebook Copies to: City Clerk State Tax Comm. Sterling Codifiers City Attorney City Engineer City Planner Project file Applicant (if appl.) Findings / Orders: Original: Minutebook Copies to: Applicant Project file City Engineer City Planner City Attorney "Record Vacation Findings'• Recorded Development Agreements: Original: Fireproof File Copies to:Applicant Project file City Engineer City Planner City Attorney NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho at the hour of 6:30 p.m. on March 22, 2000 for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of Pat McKeegan (Lee Smith Ice Arena) for a conditional use permit for an ice arena consisting of office, pro shop, fitness center, restaurant, locker room and equipment storage generally located south of Overland and east of Locust Grove Road. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 1St day of March, 2000. WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CI Y CLERK \,,`11111 It ti PUBLISH March 10 and 17, 2000. �.�oe�p01i,�o�''L SEAL ✓� 9C`C,1 � '�/�11j;ct ntt111111� MAYOR Robert D. Corrie HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PUBLIC WORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000 FILE NUMBER: CUP -00-015 REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE FOR "THE POND" ICE ARENA CONSISTING OF OFFICE, PRO SHOP, FITNESS CENTER, RESTAURANT, LOCKER ROOMS, EQUIPMENT ATORAGE AND ARENAS ZONED LO BY: PAT MCKEEGAN (REPRESENTATIVE FOR LEE SMITH ICE ARENA) LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT. LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED) SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C _TAMMY de WEERD, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE _BUILDING DEPARTMENT _FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM & FINAL) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: TAN -27-00 THU 15:06 MCKEEGAN.ARCHITECTS 208 424 8609 _ -- P.02 ----------------------------------------- -- ----------------- ------- ^------ ---- -- JAN -27-2000 1125 13., _jGS ENG I NEER I NO, I NC . 12083452950 P-02 CITY O MERIDIAN APPLICATION FOR A CONDMONAL USE PERMIT NAW: PAT McKMAN (REPRESEI ATIVE FOR LEE SMITH)—_ --PHONE:- 424-8608 419 S. 8TH STREEP, SUITE B, BOISE, inAHO 83702 GMERAL LOCATION: NW 1/4 S=ION 20, T. 3N, R. 1E DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE:— ,THE P0ND" ICE AREMA—(86- , 160— F) CC)ISISIING OF: Of TCE, PRO SHOm� S CMV'I'a,_ ST U T. I,CX=R ROCS__ r. EQUIPMIT STIORAGE AND ARENAS. ZONING CLASSWICATION: L-0 ( PROPOSED [ certify that the information contained herein is uve and correct. 161, Signature of Apph Social Security Number_ LEGAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINO Pmi ant to estabWvd procedure, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Meridian Piauning and Zoning Commission will hold a Public Hearing in the Meridian City lbt on at _._ _w __. __•m The purpose of the Hearing is to consider a CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT submitted by for the property generally descnbed as located at _ SUMDMI SIGN, BLOCK__-, LOT _9 HN -27-2000 151:10 �'.r.....,.•_..�. 2-064,r 4 'Sf_ 0'-% LEE SMITH/ICE ARENA (CONDITIONAL USE) 1. Pat McKeagan (Representative for Lee Smith) 419 S. 8th Street, Suite B, Boise, Idaho 83702 (Phone: 424-8608). 2. G. L. Voigt, P. O. Box 2044, Idaho Fails, Idaho 83403 (Phone: 524-6000). 3. Legal Description attached. 4. Deed attached, notarized consent attached. 5. Existing Use: Agricultural/Residential. 6. Present Use: Agricultural/Residential, 7. Proposed use: A 86,160 Sq. Ft. Ice Arena facility ("The Pond") consisting of office space, pro shop, fitness center, restaurant, locker rooms, equipment storage and (2) ice rinks. 8. Present zoning R-4 (Low Density Residential). 9. 30 copies of vicinity map (1:300) attached. 10. 35 copies of site plan attached, 1 - 8f2 " X 11" site plan, elevations & narrative on construction materials. 11. Radius list of 300 feet attached. 12. The subject property is located next to a proposed high school. This type of facility will provide recreational activities for the high school kids and the Meridian area as a whole. "The Pond" will be within walking distance of some residential neighborhoods. 13. Fee attached. 14. The applicant agrees to pay any sewer, water or trash fees, if any, associated with the use. 15. Affidavit of Posting attached. 16. Affidavit of Accuracy attached. 991105\Smith-C;U.pond "The Pond" Ice Arena Conditional Use Submittal Narrative The Pond Ice Arena is proposed to be located in the southeast corner of the retail/office/apartment complex located south of Overland Road and east of Eagle Road. The location is directly north of the future high school site. The facility will be used for ice hockey training recreational hockey and skating and for ice related exhibitions. One ice sheet will conform to Olympic standards with an approximate seating capacity of 1,080. The second will conform to narrower National Hockey League standards with seating for 350. Queuing areas will be used for additional seating during special events. Ancillary uses include 10 locker rooms, a skate rental/changing area, operations offices, pro shop, fitness center and restaurant/lounge. Private box seating will be provided at the restaurant and offices overlooking the Olympic rink. The structure is being constructed with the rinks, equipment rooms, lockers and rental/changing area located approximately 16 feet below grade. The entries, offices, pro shop, fitness center and restaurant are located at grade on the main level. Recessing the main portion of the structure keeps the height of the buildings main ridge at approximately 24 feet, in scale with the adjacent residential and office/retail uses. The building square footage is: Main Level Office 1,680 SF Pro Shop 1,860 SF Fitness Center 2,576 SF Restaurant 2,577 SF Circ/Queuing 4,067 SF 12,760 SF Rink Level Sheets/Seating 56,850 SF Equip/Stg 5,000 SF Locker/Rental 11,550 SF 73,400 SF Total SF 86,160 SF The main entry has a two story glazed element wrapped with a two level entry canopy and trellis. Steel framing, signage and banners are used to enhance the festive sports theme of the facility. The glazing encompasses the restaurant on the main level. A mezzanine above the will be used for storage and the central core mechanical equipment. The central core will have an open ceiling plan over the pro shop, offices and circulation/queuing spaces. A central stair and elevator is used to access the lower level. The exterior wall will have undulating landscaped berms, graphics and variations in color and texture to break up the length of the fagade. The exterior materials are textured insulated panels and aluminum storefront glazing for the walls, metal fascia, standing seam roof system and glazed skylights. The color scheme consists of two- tone panels in a light terra cotta/tan color with dark blue fascia and trim. The steel structure and tellis will be painted in a complimentary blue/gray color. The storefront glazing will be blue -silver tinted mounted in mill -finish aluminum framing. The roof will be a light blue/gray color. Building and site lighting will conform to the overall development standards. Lighting on the south and east sides' will low level directed to fall within our property limits. Maintenance, delivery and trash areas are located on the south side out of view. Parking will be shared with the rest of the office/retail complex. The parking is addressed as a part of the development narrative. The PorLd Ice Arerm Overland Road - Meridian, Idaho 83842 �7 Patrick MgKeegan Architects ) 419 So.th Stt St. - Boise, Idito �^83702 - (208) 46-8608 Ax (208) 624-8609 PR0MM. 00068 DATE: 11-30-00 SCALE IS SHOWN —1 RICHT V PATRICK MCKEECAH ARCHITECT. DRAWINGS HA' HOT DE REVSED M1-1 —1— PERHiS . nT —111T The Pond Ice Arens Overland Road - Meridian, Idaho 88842 u� Patrick MCHee=aa Architects PcT"RA nzv a 419 SAAth 8th St. - BoLe, IdA . 83702 - (208) 424-8608 FAz (208) 424-0609 PROMT.. 0008: COPYRIGHT CCJPATRICK MCKEEGAN ARCNRECR. ORAWINGS MAY NOT DE REUSED -HOW WRITTEN PEA REVISION: NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. on June 6, 2000, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of Pat McKeegan (Lee Smith Ice Arena) for a Conditional Use Permit for an ice arena consisting of office, pro shop, fitness center, restaurant, and locker room and equipment storage generally located south of Overland and east of Locust Grove Road. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested Persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 15th day of May, 2000 PUBLISH May 19th and June 2"d, 2000. V'VkILLIAM G. BER4J.,6TLY CLERK list) It11fl/1rfF��' 0 on SEAL ,`af�%P&iSitilt tit,+��t' �I 86 3 i O W 1 1 m Y2K I -L BLOCK 4 BLOCK 3 9 GALA ST. -4 3 4 PROPOSED 5 ICE RINK SITE BLOCK 1 PROPOSED RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION 1 MERIDIAN CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY I C -G R-4 300 0 1 300 600 Feet TICK ST BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST " THE POND ICE RINK REVISION BRIGGS RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20, T.3N., R.1 E., B.M., (208) 344-9700 MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO SHEET 1 OF 1 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD DESIGN BOISE, IDAHO 83705 DRAFT SCALE DATEDWG. NO. BKB 1" = 300 01/27/00 0101 1 \0101.APR DESCRIPTION FOR ICE RINK - CONDITIONAL USE RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION January 31, 2000 A parcel of land lying in the NW 1/4 of Section 20, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being a portion of that Remainder Parcel as shown on Record of Survey No. 4056, records of Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the North 1/4 corner of Section 20, T. 3N., R. 1 E., B.M., thence S 00024'16" W 443.01 feet along the east line of the NW 1/4 of said Section 20 to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; Thence S 00024'16" W 406.14 feet to, a point; Thence N 89°52'19" W 559.67 feet to a point; Thence N 00°07'41" E 406.14 feet to a point; Thence S 89°52'19" E 127.41 feet to a point of curvature; Thence along a curve to the right 25.79 feet, said curve having a radius of 20.00 feet, a central angle of 73°52'20", tangents of 15.04 feet and a chord which bears S 52056'09" E 24.04 feet to a point of reversed curvature; Thence along a curve to the left 180.50 feet, said curve having a radius of 70.00 feet, a central angle of 147°44'40", tangents of 242.08 feet and a chord which bears S 89052'19" E 134.49 feet to a point of reversed curvature; Thence along a curve to the right 25.79 feet, said curve having a radius of 20.00 feet, a central angle of 73052'20", tangents of 15.04 feet and a chord which bears N 53°11'31" E 24.04 feet to a point of tangency; Thence S 89°52'19" E 261.29 feet to a point to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 5.064 acres or 220,602 square feet, more or less. Michael E. Marks, PLS, No. 4998 0101\Ice rink.des i ,C--74 ?z/7`1 950011 '+ u�.l vl.F.it l BME 10 WARRANTY DEED FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO. �Oi For Value Received 4aiJECORDED ,i -i:; N.L. Patel M.D., Inc., Profit Sharing and Pension Plan,as to a 50°Jo interest Sanjay Ray M.D., Inc., Money Purchase Plan Trust, as to a 30% interest and Ravinder N. Gupta, M.D., Inc., Profit Sharing Plan and Trust, as to a 20% interest hereinafter referred to as Grantor, does hereby grant, bargain, sell, and convey untolb/2rJDDtr11'7 Gary L. Voigt, a single person, and R. Craig Groves, a married man as his sole and ieparate property hereinafter referred to as Grantee, whose current address is 1965 E. Overland Road, Boisc, ID the following described premises, to -wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. To HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, with their appurtenances unto the said Grantec, his heirs and assigns forever. And the said Grantor docs hereby covenant to and with the said Gra-itee, that Grantor is the owner in fee simple of said premises; that said premises are free from all encumbrances except current years taxes, levies, and assessments, and except U.S. Patent reservations, restrictions, easements of record, and casements visible upon the premises, and that Grantor willrrant and defend the same from all claims whatsoever. Dated: December 30, 1994 N.L. Patel M.D., Inc., Profit Sharing and Pension Plan B'f : 6rrl -� c j, -4 .1 � * L --e r 1- % . N. L. Patel, Trustee Sanjay Ray M.D., Inc., Money Purchase Plan Trust BY: S °"')°_"1 ' J r-1 Sanjay Ray, Trustee by Naran Bhai L. Patel, his attorney in fact Ravinder N. Gupta, M.D., Inc., Profit Sharing Plan and Trust BY: 601"Viit�f* dr G 11 IYa.«., Ravinder. N. Gupta, Trustcc by Naran Bhni Patel, his attorney in fact First .American Title Company of Idaho EXHIBIT "A° Part of the Northwest quarter of Section 20, Township 3. North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly..,; described as follows: Beginning at the quarter section corner'between Sections 17 and; 20; Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian; thence.` South 0014' East 2,645.6 feet to the center of said Section 20; thence South 89018' West 944.0 feet to the center of a lateral; thence traversing along the center of said lateral North 39033' West 232.0 feet to a point; thence North 12044' West 626.0 feet to a point; thence North 54038' West 570.0 feet to a point; thence North 14006' West 202.0 feet to a point; thence North 21036' West 48.0 feet to a point; thence North 11050' West 150.0 feet to a point; thence North 8016' West 150.0 feet to a point; thence North 5006' West 150.0 feet to a point; thence North 13002' West 150.0 feet to a point; thence North 19055' West 450.0 feet to a point; thence North 16024' West 122.0 feet to a point; thence North 8048' West 150.0 feet to a point on the North boundary of said Section 20; thence North 89031' East 2,062.0 feet to the'REAL POINT Or BEGINNING. Jan -03-00 04:36P VOIGT OAVIS REALTORS " •.,' ++ a•,.icxaJ e�wt 208 529-0882 P,02 P.02 rctn�nu, �rvt. 2208345'950 STATE OF I COUNTY OF That i ss AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST (address) being first duty sworn upon (state) - — oath, depose and say: the record owner and/or representative of the property described on the attached, I grant my permission to �- c submit the accompanying application pertaining to that property. this 3 day of 4-9- 'actDv (S' acture) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. - ,tXpTA /� y"';N .SAv6�`G. OF << Notary Public f Idah Residing at %�.C1 My Commission Expires: 1 TOTAL P.02 JAN -03-2000 16 98 00 208 529 0882 i P.02 IEB. -11' 00 (THU) 15:34 K I NKO' S_ TEL : 2083362537 FE13-14-2000 16:53 1RIGGS ENGINEERING. INC. AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST STATE OF IDAHO COUNTY OF ADA j ss I 9 - C2xi Name 12083452950 P.02 5c 1f,q. I onto Ad -dr e. �6 , :,rP S9 %7L T.�.�, being first duly swum upon (city) (state) oath, depose and say: T . That I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant my permission to (na e} (address) to submit the accompanying application pertaining to that property. P. 003 2. 1 agree to indemnify, defend and hold the City of Meridian and it's employees harmless from any claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements contained herein or as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application. Dated this �_ day of (� � v� (Signature) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. No ary Public for Idaho 4 Residing at'�'1� T My Commission Expires: k, FEB -1? -2000 13:53 2083362537 92% TOTAL P.OP P.03 rrEB. -11' 1)(THU) 15:34 KINKO' S TEL:2083362537 FEB -14-2000 16:53 BRIGGS ENGINEERING. INC. � .kY,1?063452950 STATE OF IDAHO } } ss COUNTY OF ADA ) I, 96be,-T Name AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST 6cvss 6ZZ3 N•f0iSc S(A �' ( e ( O O 60�-_5 XA 85-7L3 —,being first duly swom upon (city) (state) oath, depose and say: P. 002 1 • That ( am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant my permission to At (nareel J (address) to submit the accompanying application pertaining to that property. 2. l agree to indemnify, defend and hold the City of Meridian and it's employees harmless from any claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements Contained herein or as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application. 1, Dated this day of a "L �g t -- ure) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written, f V1 Al o ry Public for Idaho _ - Residing at - - _ My Commission Expires: 5 TOTAL P.02 FEB -17-2000 14:52 209336"D5:3 92% P.02 AFFIDAVIT OF ACCURACY STATE OF IDAHO ) COUNTY OF ADA ) I, Beck Bowcutt Briggs Engineerim Inc 1800 W Overland Road (name) (address) Boise Idaho being first duly sworn upon (city) (state) oath, depose and say - That I prepared the attached applications and the information contained is true and correct. (Preliminary Plat, Annexation, Re -zone, Conditional Use and Planned Unit Development) Dated this day of ��u 2000 (Signature) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. 0 10 1 \affid-accuracy i' �- of ry Public for Idaho Residing at 232i My Commission Expires- -�7-Z-5 -,Z4ZS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF IDAHO ) ss COUNTY OF ADA ) I, Donna Wilson, Briggs Engineering, Inc. 1800 W. Overland Rd. (name) (address) Boise ID being first duly sworn upon (city) (state) oath, depose and say: I will personally post the subject property with the hearing notice sign one week prior to the public hearing for the (annexation, rezone, conditional use, and preliminary plat of Resolution Subdivision). Dated this day of iw a14A1 (Signature) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. ••.•''SSEER Mph •.• ,=S DoT AR Y Z �. P U BL~� O l� �`�` Of19 O lO Raflid-posting e otary Put 11c for Idaho Residing at WT m My Commission 12M. , T ffi� &2 o /t/6 — 36D ' o,- ,vwn- c. i sT PARCEL PRIMOWNER S1117346610 PECK CURTIS D & KIM L <' 51117438620 VAN AUKER RONALD W 3 51117346600 HOWELL WILLARD & ANGELA y R7100270100 CONTRACTORS EQUIP SUPLY CO INC S R7100270200 JE DOUBLE D LLC c R7100270300 PLAYGROUND INC S1117346660 HOWELL WILLARD & ANGELA S S1120212410 VOIGT GARY L AND GROVES C R & R L AND BASS ROBERT & DANA 5 S1120121000 KENAI PARTNERS LLC io S1120223302 OVERLAND 16 LLC A S1120223301 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LDS R 51120244300 JOINT SCHOOL DIST #2 ADOCONCAT 6149 N MEEKER PL STE 250 3084 E LANARK PO BOX 848 2000 E OVERLAND 4601 N FIVE MILE 4098 N JULLION WAY PO BOX 848 1908 JENNIE LEE DR 6223 N DISCOVERY WAY 6223 N DISCOVERY WAY 50 E NORTH FLOOR 22ND 911 N MERIDIAN RD STATCONCAT BOISE, ID 83713-1568 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 EAGLE, ID 83616-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 BOISE, ID 83713-0000 BOISE, ID 83704-2763 EAGLE, ID 83616-0000 IDAHO FALLS, ID 83404-6159 BOISE, ID 83713-0000 BOISE, ID 83713-0000 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84150-0002 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-2241 0 Z 0 0 M 0 FAIT C•1 0 co 0) 0 0� CA 0 A-ok, _ The Pond Ice Arens Overland Road - Meridian, Idaho 88842 Patdei W. Kown AmMtwU _ IV S -M Bilk SI. - Ba.. m h. a37U - (208) 424 -ON F.: (269) 4243669 eorvmnn ©reisia ue~tewx axxrtcer. owwxes w� xo* �s uuss ter. /"1 77 N — O C266 oRICA d � � a Q F L � C,3 x �wl N x Q CL Ice cr Q I p.. _ C � C M v O 0 a'M d- n -31 A. FZ L a� m f�J A O 0 0 ❑ (n M O J Z Q N C 77 June 2, 2000 CUP 00-015 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 6, 2000 APPLICANT Pat McKeegan ITEM NO. !� REQUEST CUP for an ice arena consisting of office, pro shop, fitness center, restaurant, locker room and equipment storage for proposed Resolution Business Park / Lee Smith Ice Arena - south of Overland Road, east of Locust Grove Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS See attached PZ minutes See attached recommendations Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Coot - [ Vk WHITE, PETERSON, PRUSS, MORROW & GIGRAY, P.A ATTORNEYS AT Law JuLIEKLEm FISCFffit F.. 200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE BRE J. JOHNS N POST OFFICE BOX 1150 D. SAT D. SAMUEL Jotnvsox L JOHNSON MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680-1150 WILLIAM A. MoRRow WILLIAM F.NtcHOI.sCHRISTO TEL 208 288-2499 PHILIP APON (2 08)288-2501 FAxBER OSPETER STEPHEN L. PRuss ERIC S. RossMAN TODD A. ROSSMAN DAVID M. SwARTLEY TIRRENCE R. WHITE May 30, 2000 To: Staff Applicant Affected Property Owner(s) Re: Application Case No. CUP -00-015 Hearing Date: Tune 6, 2000 NAMPA OFFICE 104 NINTH AvENUE SOUTH POST OFFICE BOX 247 NAMPA, IDAHO 83653-0247 TEL.208) 466-9272 FAX (208) 4664405 PLEASE REPLY TO MERIDIAN OFFICE RBCEPv7E- J U N - 1 2000 CITY OF MERM AN FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Staff, Applicant and/or Affected Property Owner(s): Please note that these Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be presented to the 'City Council at the public hearing on the above referenced matter by the Planninand Zoning Administrator. Due to the volume of matters which the City Council must deci e, and to insure your position is understood and clear, it is impportant to have a consistent format by which matters are presented at the public hearings bef-Ore the City Council. The City Council strongly recommends: That you take time to carefully review the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, and be Findings to state your position on this application by addressing the Findings and Recommendations of the Plammng and Zoning Commission; and That you carefully complete (be sure it is legible) the Position Statement if You disagree with the Findings and -Recommendations of the Plan><ung and Zoning Commission. The Position Statement form for this and is available at the City Clerk's office. It is recommended that you prepare a Position Statement and deliver it to the City Clerk prior to the hearing: if possible. If that is not possible, please present your Position Statement to the City Council at the hearing, along with eight (8) copies. The copies will be 'Cresented to the Mayor, Council, Planning and Zoning Administrator, Public Works and the ity Attorney. If you are a part of a g�rroup, it is strongl recommended that one Position Statement be filled out for the group, which can be signed by the representative for the group. Very truly yours, ity Att ey s ice ty BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ICE ARENA AND ASSOCIATED BUSINESSES PAT MCIkEEGAN FOR LEE SMITH Applicant Case No. CUP -00-015 RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL 1. The property is located at the SE corner of Overland Road and S Locust Grove Road, Meridian, Idaho. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is G. L. Voigt of Idaho Falls. 3. Applicant is Pat McKeegan for Lee Smith of Boise. 4. The subject property is currently zoned Ada County (R -T) and Meridian R-4. There is a current application and recommendation before the Meridian City Council for rezoning to L -O and C -N. The zoning districts of L -O and C -N are defined within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-7-2. 5. The proposed application requests a conditional use permit for an Ice Arena consisting of an office, pro shop, fitness center, restaurant, locker rooms, equipment storage and arenas. The zoning designation within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance requires a conditional use permit be obtained RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT —"THE POND" ICE ARENA — PAT MCKEEGAN FOR LEE SMITH for most uses including those requested by the Applicant. (Meridian City Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-8-1). 6. The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission recognizes that the proposed application is in compliance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 7. The use proposed within the subject application will in fact, constitute a conditional use as determined by City Policy. RECOMMENDATION 1. The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the conditional use permit as requested by the applicant, subject to the following. It should be noted that this is part of a multi -faceted requested development including annexation, rezoning, preliminary plat and 3 conditional use permits and conditional recommendations contained in AZ - 00 -004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006, CUP -00-015, CUP -00-016 and CUP -017 will apply where relevant. Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 1.1 All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site "C" (ice arena) shall be incorporated here. 1.2 A minimum of seven (7) handicap accessible spaces must be provided to directly serve this pavement of Overland Road and Locust Grove Road and install pavement tapers with 15 -foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. ey/Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\Recommendations\ResolutionCUP15.wpd RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT —"THE POND" ICE ARENA — PAT MCKEEGAN FOR LEE SMITH MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING --MAY 9 2000 The regular scheduled meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission was call to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Keith Borup. MEMBERS PRESENT: Keith Borup, Sally Norton, Kent Brown, Tom Barbeiro, Richard Hatcher. OTHERS PRESENT: David Swartley, Bruce Freckleton, Brad Hawkins Clark, Will Berg. Borup: We'd like to call to order our meeting this evening. This is a regular scheduled meeting for Planning and Zoning Commission. I'd like to go through attendance of the Commissioner's. First item on the agenda is the Consent Agenda. I would entertain a motion for approval of the Consent Agenda. Brown: Mr. Chairman I would move approval of the Consent Agenda, Items A,B and C, minutes from the March 22"d, April 3rd and April 11th meetings. Hatcher: I second the motion. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Brown: I would like to be excused for the first 7 items. Borup: Okay. Have fun. Item number 1 and 2 were tabled. I believe we tabled those items wanting to finalize Items 3 through 6. Would we like to skip to Items 3 through 6 and come back or would the Commissioner's like to open and vote on 1 and 2 right now. 3. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF 17 LOTS ON 107.06 ACRES IN PROPOSED L-0 AND C -G ZONES FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC—OVERLAND AND LOCUST GROVE ROADS: Borup: Does staff have any additional comments to make on this. It was continued for the ACHD report. We had the draft report a while back. We have the final report now. Is the applicant here and like to come forward. Do any of the Commissioner's have anything additional they'd like to ask the applicant, other than the ACHD report. Bowcutt: These items were deferred because we were awaiting Ada County Highway District Staff Report as you recall at our public hearing a month or so ago. We had not even received a draft. The staff, I think they went through about 3 versions of the draft and it did go to the highway district Commissioner's last Wednesday at their noon meeting for discussion. To bring you up to date the Commissioner's did recommend Meridian Planning and , ming Commission May 9, 2000 Page 2 approval of all the projects involved. They instructed their staff to get with us and the City of Meridian and the school district and see what can be done to exhilarate the upgrade of Overland Road between Locust Grove and Eagle Road. At this point of time, it is on their 2004 plan. They realize that they could have an operational high school as early as 2002. That did concern them. They have also required multiple improvements of my client, which includes constructing a 3rd lane from the east end of our property up to the intersection of Locust Grove and then south on Locust Grove to our southerly boundary. On of the comments that was made by the Commission, that type of improvement can run anywhere from $125 to $175 thousand dollars. If we go in and we construct that 3�d lane and then they come in 6, 12, 18 months later and tear it all out to build their five lane, it makes more sense that we exhilarate the 5 lane and put those monies to use building or helping to construct the 5 lane. Therefore, it would save some public funds. The things that I want to bring to your attention that they placed upon this project, they have asked us to contribute 25% of a signal at the intersection of Locust Grove and Overland. The intersection operates at a level of service A at this time, however, the left hand turn lane operates at a level of service F. According to ACHD's traffic counts the counts at this time do not warrant signalization. In the future they realize they will need a signal there. They understand that the retail that we propose at that corner is down the road is not one of the first 3 or 4 phases that is going to be further down the road then that. Probably co-insiding with some type of a Locust Grove overpass. They accept the fact that a light is necessary, but state they will construct that light when it is warranted. Secondly, they have asked us to contribute $112,500 which would be 75% of the light at our new Millenium Way Overland intersection which is the collector roadway for the high school. That 75% does include the high school or the school district share. My conversations with the school district, they have indicated that they will pay whatever proportionate share the highway district deems is attributed to their traffic volume. There is approximately 5000 trips a day through Millenium Way. Of those 5,000, 3,000 will be from going to and from the high school site. They've asked us to contribute $52,800 dollars to a trust fund for sidewalk along Overland Road. We asked them to allow us to construct the sidewalk versus trust funding for it. The policy of the City of Meridian is they would like to see those sidewalks go in as soon as possible. Their concern was if we placed the sidewalk in at the edge of the new right of way that it could be torn out when the road is rebuilt. Our suggestion was we'll take the sidewalk and meander within our 30 foot landscaped area. Therefore, we will be outside the right of way and would not require any modification. The Commission seemed to believe that's a viable option. They asked staff to get with us and discuss it. We will be building decel lanes at the intersection. They ok'ed all of our approaches on Overland Road. They asked us to upgrade our collector. We shoed a 41 foot collector roadway section for Millenium Way. They indicated they'd like that to be 46 foot section. My client agreed to that. They asked us to provide adequate stacking room for any of the approaches as they intercept with Millenium Way. The only major revision was on Locust Grove. We have this approach right here. They have asked us to move this to offset it from this roadway here to Meridian Planning and ._ -ining Commission May 9, 2000 Page 3 increase that distance of offset. We will shift this building this direction and then shift this to the south and then put parking in there. Our offsets from all of the major intersections for the signal will be installed in the future are acceptable. This was the only thing of significance. This is a multi phased project and the highway district commission liked this—the idea of a long term project. The first phase will be the ice hockey facility. The second phase would consist of 140 units of the total 200 apartments, 2001. The seminary will go in whatever time the high school goes in. All of this is down the road. Your staff placed a limitation on the conditional use permit for the apartments -40 units in the first phase. I brought that up with Ada County Highway District and they said that doesn't make any sense. That is one of the lowest traffic generators on the site. Also, you can't afford to pay all of these trust funds and make all the improvements if you can't begin the projects. 40 units is not acceptable. My clients indicate they can not function with 40 units. Ada County Highway District did look at impact fees generated by this project. The school district is exempt from impact fees but all of the uses on the property would be subject. The multi family project would pay $160,000 in impact fees. The retail space would generate over one million dollars. That brings you up to date. Barbeiro: Becky is Millenium Drive to be placed as part of the first phase. Bowcutt: Yes sir. The first phase we are constructing all of the public roadway systems. We'll built Millenium Way and put all the sewer, water, 3 phase power and then build this public street here, the rotary and this public street here. We have all ready designed all of those roadways. Barbeiro: Can you remind me of what kind of meetings you've had with the school district in regards to Millenium Drive, the students that will use that and the roadway being the primary road for all of the construction at the high school. Bowcutt: They will be coming up and down that roadway. It will have to be there before they can pull their permit. The highway district has indicated they want to focus all of the high school traffic where that signal is going to be constructed. Barbeiro: As I recall, the conditional use permit for the high school won't be available until the signal is operational. Bowcutt: According to your planning staff the high school does not require a conditional use permit in their R-4 zone. They will just be submitting for building permit. That is why the highway district imposed the 75% of that light—the $112,000 because they would not see that school application come through. All of my users will be conditional use applications. That was the other thing that they liked. Norton: According to the Ada County Highway District we received the draft report and then the final report sometime today. The difference between the two is that instead of Meridian Planning and __ening Commission May 9, 2000 Page 4 paying the $52,000 for the sidewalk on Overland, you will put in the sidewalk in your landscape area. Is that correct? Bowcutt: That's what we requested. Norton: You started to talk about not doing the center lane improvement on Overland in order for Overland to be widened to 5 lanes earlier. Would you go through what you said on that. Bowcutt: In the staff report approved by the Commission it mandates that we construct a 3 I center turn lane for the entire length of our property. It would be from our perimeter to the intersection and then down to our southern boundary here. Three lane on Overland and Locust Grove. Norton: How close is your far east property to Eagle Road? Bowcutt: This is one half mile. In our staff report we are required to construct that. The issue we brought up with the commission is we would like to see the improvements accelerated. We don't want to see the third lane wasted. The elevations will all change. Norton: Did you get any idea how far up the priority list it was going to be moved? Bowcutt: The staff and I had at least four discussions. They indicated that their superiors would not make a decision. We would have to take our plea to the commission and that is what we did. They instructed their staff, you need to figure out a solution and now. With that school coming in 2002, 1 would anticipate them trying to accelerate it two years—If I had to guess. Norton: Are you under the understanding that that road will be five lanes by the time school goes in 2002. Bowcutt: That is what I hope and I think the commission wants their staff to figure out how to do that. Borup: At this point, something could be worked out that's the way to go. If it can't be worked out then the 3 lanes are going in. Bowcutt: We will end up building the third lane. Those requirements are set down. I did forget to mention, they are going to add additional turn lanes at the Eagle Road Overland intersection and that work should begin in a few months and they indicated they are going to get started on the Meridian Road Overland intersection for that improvement. Borup: Before we proceed I'd like a show of hands how many people are here to testify on this application. We have received public testimony over the last three months so Meridian Planning and ,ning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 5 what we'd be open for is anything pertaining to the ACHD report we will be glad to take any testimony on. Bertell: Steve Bertell. I live at 2535 S. Velvet Falls Way. Mr. chairman and members of the commission, at this time I would like to present to the board a total of 725 signatures from residents from all the impacted Subdivisions, all respectfully asking the commission to at least delay the approval of this development until such a time as Overland and Locust Grove Roads are widened. Those who have signed the petitions are frustrated over having to drive in all ready heavily trafficked roadway on a daily basis. We agree with the ACHD impact analysis statement that the findings of the development would only intensify the all ready major traffic problems in this area. In fact, I parked at the intersection of Overland and Locust Grove the afternoon of March 23'd from 3 PM until 6 PM and I counted 3137 vehicles using that intersection, either crossing or turning from one street to another. This coincides with the ACHD report findings of approximately 11,422 vehicles using Overland Road on a daily basis. This is existing traffic. Also, during that 3 hour period, I witnessed one rear ender accident, one near accident and my wife and I came upon another accident on Overland Road on April 10th at 5:50 PM. The traffic on these roads will easily double if not triple as a result of this development. The Ada County Highway District has no plans to widen Overland until 2004 since it is in their 5 year plan. No plans to widen Locust Grove south of Overland until sometime outside the 2005 year plan. No plans to install a traffic light there until it is warranted. I don't know what the definition of warranted is. The developer stated they wanted to start the major ice hockey and sports arena this year pending bond approval. The high school could open as early as fall 2002. Don't misunderstand us. We are not opposed to this development, but what we are saying is that we are requesting that Overland and Locust Grove be widened to accommodate the dramatic traffic increase that this proposal would create. If there is a traffic mishap on the freeway, Overland Road immediately backs up. If emergency vehicle needed to get to one of our Subdivisions, it would be difficult at best for that vehicle to get through. Let's not make Overland and Locust Grove roads another fiasco like the Curtis Road extension was. At least consider the opinions of the 725 residents as well as all of us who live in the 6 impacted Subdivisions. Borup: You feel that the road would be improved on a faster time frame without the million dollars that this project would contribute toward the roads. Bertell: I am a lay man and don't know where the money would come from. We are concerned about— Borup: We are lay men too (Inaudible) and it is not going to come from anywhere other than this type of thing. So, the fastest way to get Overland approved, is to get the money. Since this has been carrying on for several months, we had quite a number of staff recommendations on this project. Do we need a refresher on that. We know staffs recommendation is. I am thinking I mean the applicant either agrees with them or —she mentioned one in her report, so I think I'd like to get Becky back up. You had Meridian Planning and ,ning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 6 mentioned one item as far as staff recommendation on number of apartment units. We've got your response to all of staff comments. That was the only one that stuck out. Were there any others? That was under the CUP, Item number 2 on your response. Bowcutt: The annexation and zoning application, we were in agreement. preliminary plat, I highlighted item 8. The applicant intends to provide landscape easements along Locust Grove and Overland Roads. An association will be formed to govern perimeter landscaping. We ask that that be an easement. I believe that staff had a discussion about it being a separate lot. Borup: Staff's concern was who will maintain it. Bowcutt: At a minimum the landscape buffer shall be placed within a permanent landscape easement designated such on the plat. We would like that to be designated as an easement on the plat and provide an association for maintenance. Item 8, preliminary plat requirements. Item 10, we agreed to pipe the Hunter Lateral as requested by staff. We ask that we be allowed to provide a western fence along the western side of the apartments. Staff made a statement they prefer that it be unfenced if we pipe the lateral. Clarification on Item 13. We have a little access road. It was not intended to be a private drive. It is an access way providing joint access to those buildings. We just want to clarify that our intention was not to construct curb gutter or sidewalk there because it is an alley access. Under the PUD, I highlighted Item 4. We did not provide any RV storage, parking areas for the multi family. Those uses will be prohibited. Only personal cars will be allowed. We do not propose a maintenance building at this site. All maintenance will be contracted out with a maintenance company. We disagreed on Item 7 concerning the parking requirements. Staff asked for 2.3 spaces per dwelling unit. The ordinance mandates 2. 1 know of no multi family application where staff imposed 2.3. 1 went to another complex that has garages called the Renascence next to Chinden and Eagle Road. We did that civil engineering for that site. That one has garages and I noticed that people who have two cars but have a single garage, their spouse parked in front of the garage. I think what staffs intention for additional parking was for guests or something like that. Our contention is, it is not necessary with our type of design we have more than what we would ever need in parking. For the Ice Rink, I think there was a difference of eight spaces. Mr. McKeegan got up to discuss that stating that we have substantial amount of overflow parking to the north and there will be very few events where you would find that all parking spaces would be completely utilized. His contention was that adequate parking was provided. Obviously we were opposed to the limitation—it was the limitation of 30 units in the first phase of the apartments. We had asked for the first phase to consist of 140. For the record and for those people in the audience that were not here at the last hearing, we are asking for conceptual approval of this planned unit development, but we are only asking for site specific approval for the ice arena and the 200 unit apartments. All the other users with the exception of the high school will have to come back before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. All surrounding properties within 300 feet will be notified. Legal notice will be put in the paper. Each user will have Meridian Planning and 7 ning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 7 to come back before this body and go through this process again. That is one factor that should be taken into consideration as far as what improvements are done out on these roadway systems when the timing of these lights and so forth. If a user comes in say a year and a half from now, and he will generate a substantial amount of traffic, at that point of time if those improvements aren't out there to support that development, I would anticipate commission having a difficult time of proving it. We've got to start somewhere and we've got to get that collector roadway and this other network of roadways and utilities to provide access to the high school. The only way we can afford to do it is to take these first couple phases and move forward. Borup: Thank you. Any questions from the commission? Barbeiro: We can ask staff questions as a whole or individually. The one that catches my eye right now is the storage areas because that is a city ordinance. Other then that, if you wanted to go down the line with some of the things that Becky disagreed with. Hawkins Clark: Commissioner Barbeiro, members of the Commission the ordinance requirement for storage areas has typically been something that if the developer makes a commitment we have waived at this level. It is not necessarily required a variance. It really particularly when garages are provided. It is something we look favorable at. Borup: At this particular site there is a proposed mini storage unit down the street. Barbeiro: How about the maintenance building. Hawkins Clark: I think when the covenants, correct me Becky if they are not, but typically we —they are going to contract out. That is not ordinance required. I think it is a recommendation. We are fine with that. On the parking issue mainly we were pointing out that the fact that on Valeri Heights no tandem parking was allowed. If your going to allow it here, we just mainly wanted to raise the attention. We certainly aren't looking for more asphalt. I think we concur with the 460 number for required parking. The cross access issue was important. Obviously we'd ask for a revised preliminary plat that shows that, that shows the new Locust Grove Driveways to be submitted for the City Council—prior to the City Council so we can review the revised preliminary plat that reflects these changes. Barbeiro: Becky, in our last meeting, you did tell us that you were going to have a cross access over the Hunter Lateral, is that correct. Bowcutt: Yes, I think our sketched out we were going to make an inter connection between those two buildings and just north of the daycare facility into that little rotary. We make on making that revision and getting that to staff prior to the City Council. Meridian Planning and _- ,ning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 8 Barbeiro: Brad the recommendation regarding landscape buffers. 25 versus 30 and staff would prefer to have a separate lot where the developer would prefer to have an easement. Comment on that please. Hawkins Clark: This issue comes up frequently. It is mainly our concern is the consistency of appearance for principle arterials like what Overland is going to be. I think in this case with the easement going to be maintained the full buffer distance by a single entity, that's fine. Our main issue is when you have single, multiple single lots that all have a easement, each of them can take care of that landscape however they want. Barbeiro: Becky, the property will remain under one ownership, is that correct. Bowcutt: No sir. When you plat it then it would be eligible to sell off the lots to separate owners. What we propose to do is place landscape easements on the plat and then we will have to have covenants, obviously governing the uses on these lots and so forth. On these covenants it would stipulate like lot owner dues. They would not be homeowners association dues, but lot owner dues which would provide for the maintenance of all of the landscaping. It is all maintained the same. We are going to provide a landscape plan so all of it would be the same. You would not end up with a hodge podge. That is not our intention. Barbeiro: Your new plan will account for 7 handicapped spots at the arena. Bowcutt: Yes sir. Mr. McKeegan when on the record last time that they would add those. Barbeiro: Brad, when we talked about the 30 dwelling units for the apartments, Becky's note was that ACHD thought that the apartments would be one of the lower traffic count generators. Can you comment on that. Hawkins Clark: It was a bad day. Staff has re -thought that. Those are national transportation engineer figures that seem to have been accounted for. This is the only – there are only two projects that are coming in right now and certainly when you look at traffic generation you can't really take into account projects that aren't before this commission. Your really only have two projects that are before you and to put some controls on—your certainly not going to put a control on the ice arena. They are going to have events and that will draw—I think the apartment complexes—we did talk about if they are doing the 140 previously they had outlined a phase one which was more or less the northwest portion of their site B there and it didn't provide for any vehicular access out of that phase one out onto Millenium Way. Every one of those 140 was funneling out through the driveway onto Overland at the west end and not Millenium Way which is the collector. I think we would point out that we would like to see some kind of vehicular access in phase one over to Millenium Way. Meridian Planning and. ming Commission May 9, 2000 Page 9 Bowcutt: I think the applicant indicated at the last hearing he would be willing to revise what they had proposed as their first 140 units because you felt or this commission felt it was critical that they intersect with Millenium Way. So their will be an access. We will go on the record with the first phase will intersect with Millenium Way by that vehicular connection. Barbeiro: The final point was, the gates we discussed in the last one to prevent cross tracking through the residential from the high school over to Locust Grove, the developer suggested putting gates in. Is that something that will be a final item for you or is it still up in the air. Bowcutt: I think they are still under the opinion that they would prefer some type of gates. Borup: This was a gate at which point? Barbeiro: There was to be a gate over the Hunter Lateral crossing to prevent the kids from crossing through the apartments and the developer also considered putting a gate into the entrance off of Overland and just past the entrance off of Millenium Way. I believe there were three gates. Is that correct. Bowcutt: Yes, that was my understanding. We would have to have approval from your fire department to install those. The location would also have to be approved by Ada County Highway District because they want to make sure you have adequate stacking room. Borup: Has that been discussed with ACHD staff? Bowcutt: It was brought up briefly and their comment was we have to have adequate stacking room. They allow you to do it within a private roadway network as long as you have it 50 or 75 feet into the property. Maybe its 100, 1 can't remember. The last one I had was a mini storage. They don't want 3 or 4 cars turning into the site and then waiting for the gate and sticking out into the roadway. I would recommend that the commission put their subject to Ada County Highway District and fire department approval. Borup: The only other comment I think staff was on the fence —1 don't think the staff comments addressed that either way, or did they. (Inaudible)privacy fence (inaudible). There is no concern there is there. Hawkins Clark: No. Norton: I have a question for staff. At our last public hearing I had a question about gates, but has been addressed. My notes say signage of gates would be worked out with staff. Has signage been addressed. Meridian Planning and ling Commission May 9, 2000 Page 10 Hawkins Clark: Signage of the gates –of the project. They did have a written response on signage from I believe Idaho Electric Signs and then McKeegan responded for signage on the ice arena in writing. That should be in the packets. Bowcutt: I think we did have a discussion because they had some types of lights on the side of building. Norton: That was addressed on the ice arena, but for the apartment complex— Bowcutt: I did provide some specifications on signage. I believe it was a monument type sign. END OF SIDE ONE Bowcutt: I'll have to check my packet. I believe it was a monument sign. That is what staff has proposed. Borup: I think we'd be comfortable that it wouldn't be anything difference than a monument sign. Anything else. You checking or are you done Becky. Oh. Any final comments from staff. Hawkins Clark: Commissioner I think the main concern—I don't know that there is an emergency vehicular access issue has been resolved to our satisfaction. With the school site—schools are allowed in the R-4 without any public hearings. They can just come in when they get this approved and not have any public hearings on the school site and really this is the opportunity to deal with the school site even though the majority of this— Borup: You taking about a secondary access. Hawkins Clark: Yes. What did they say potentially 1800 students or something. We certainly understand and want to support the protecting these neighborhoods from cross through traffic from the school, but there is a stub street here on the west boundary of the site and then there is a stub street here immediately next to the future park site, which would be here. Whether or not those are extended into the site or how that would work, I guess our main issue or concern is that it be dealt with and maybe it can be dealt with at Council level, but somehow there'd be another access into this 55 acre school site other than just Millenium Way, particularly for emergency vehicles. Borup: Have you discussed it to what point. Would the emergency break away ballards or something like that. Hawkins Clark: Right. I don't believe the fire department has really specifically addressed it. Meridian Planning and. .ning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 11 Barbeiro: Brad, we have two opportunities to add emergency access. Is this where the seminary is going? Hawkins Clark: No. Here, right. Barbeiro: With the new LDS church, is there any opportunity to have a emergency access straight through their property or off of this road here as that roads appears to abut the property of the high school. Hawkins Clark: Commissioner, the LDS church is being built. It is designed. The site is under construction. I don't think there is any opportunity there. Borup: Sounds like here and here are the two stub streets. I don't think the intention is to have a traffic flow through there. Break away emergency ballard would let the fire trucks through and isn't that staffs concern. Do we know where this building maybe sited. Bowcutt: I can answer that question. The only information we received from the school district is that the school would most likely sit back in this location here up against this Hunter Lateral. Obviously the parking lots and field would be back here. There is two existing public streets right here coming into Raven Hills and another one here in Los Alamitos. It is the highway districts intention that those not be connected to the site vehicularly for like student use but be connected for pedestrian bicycle and possibly emergency access. I would assume something like ballards or maybe what they propose there. It depends on the site configuration. I stopped at Mr. Carberry's office today to see if I could obtain a copy of their draft site plan. He indicated that he does not have a copy of it. You got one. He said I don't have one, in fact I think they are still working on it. Your going to have to talk to Skyler at Hummel Architects. I said it would be nice Jim if I could see it to make sure your needs are met as far as secondary emergency access. Until we see where those circulation patterns of the school are located, we don't know what to do. Borup: Maybe at this point we just need to put some requirements in there and let them design around it. Bowcutt: Our agreement with the school district states that we ... the seller acknowledges that the above described street, which is our Millenium Way, shall be the sole access route to the school which buyer intends to construct on the premises other than the emergency access here and after set forth. So, (inaudible) if we it we'd want an emergency access through you. Borup: So hereinafter set forth they are not specified. Meridian Planning and _ ,ning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 12 Bowcutt: Yeah, it was emergency vehicle access if required. In order to meet uniform fire code. (Inaudible) got a lot of parking lot along here, if they need it and if that is a adequate location, then it makes sense that we do have a secondary emergency access. It would all depend on their site plan and their needs. Borup: What are saying would be secondary. Bowcutt: If you look at— Borup: Okay, the access is still from Millenium right? Bowcutt: Yes sir. Borup: So from Millenium Drive is blocked there is no secondary access. Bowcutt: This is their primary vehicular access. There is landscaping and parking areas— Borup: Okay, your saying they could come down here through the parking lot into the site. Bowcutt: Exactly. So if the school says based on our configuration we need some emergency vehicle access here or here or even link into this drive that wraps around here. That would be an option. If its needed. I have not seen the site plan. Have you seen it. You got a copy of it. Barbeiro: It was the first draft which was two months ago. Bowcutt: Oh. He said they are still working on it. I am going to try to obtain a copy hopefully before we go to the council because I'd like them to see that and I think it would be beneficial if we know what it looks like. Borup: Sounds like the mood of the City and probably the Commissioner's is that there needs to be some type of emergency secondary access. Not a vehicle access but just emergency. Barbeiro: So when building our recommendation we would include additional emergency access through this site to be determined later. Or more specific. Borup: I don't know that we need to be more specific as long as there is another access. Hatcher: One thing to take into consideration when we are discussing emergency access of the future high school site is as Becky has pointed out, if we were to bring in a second emergency access in the approximate location of the ice hockey arena or Meridian Planning and — ning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 13 possibly at the apartments, first of all the apartments are a congested meandering parking lot. There is no primary means of traffic, just a private roadway system. I don't think that is a valid option. Second, bringing a secondary emergency access in and around the ice skating rink I don't think is a valid option either for the sample fact that if you have a event occurring your going to have high traffic volume there. Playing devil's advocate we have an event at the school that requires emergency vehicles and we have the ice rink letting out. Millenium and all those roads are going to be plugged. When considering an emergency access to the high school, I think we should look at the options of doing emergency break away ballards down at Raven the Subdivision down below with the public road. Borup: What is the purpose of the secondary emergency access. Hatcher: If the fire truck can't get to — Borup: And that would be because of heavy traffic or because of some accident blocking the entire roadway. I assume it would be something blocking the entire roadway and then they would need another access. Hatcher: That is correct and that is why I am saying if we (inaudible) by the ice rink, they are too close together. Borup: Your saying something would be blocking both roads. Hatcher: I am saying if an event at the ice rink was to let out— Borup: That's just heavy traffic. That's not necessarily blocking — Hatcher: Hey, we've all been there. We know what it can really be like. One all ready looks like it is all ready a culdesac if I'm not mistaken. One of the two southern ones— we put the condition on the school district now and let them design accordingly and be done with it. Barbeiro: Couldn't we have a primary and a secondary. Hatcher: You would. Millenium would be your primary. We are talking about the secondary right now. I don't think this site is big enough to need three accesses. Borup: Okay, one of you guys had a motion earlier. Hatcher: I was trying to make a motion to close the public hearing. Norton: I second the motion. Borup: All in favor. Meridian Planning and ^ ning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 14 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Barbeiro: Which hearing did we just close. Borup: Technically we closed— Hatcher: Can we close all of them, one through six. Borup: Technically we closed 3, cause that is the only one we opened. I think all the testimony we received was on all the applications, so — Hatcher: Mr. Chairman, I motion that we close the public hearing for Item 4,5,and 6. Borup: Let me open it. Open public hearing for Item number 4. Hatcher: I motion that we close it. Norton: I second it. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: I'd like to open Item number 5. Hatcher: I motion that we close it. Norton: I second it. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: I'd like to open Item number 6. Hatcher: I motion that we close that. Norton: I second that. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: Would you like to handle Items 1 and 2 and then go on to the others. Meridian Planning and, ling Commission May 9, 2000 Page 15 Barbeiro: Can we do both of them at the same time. Borup: They are both two separate items, but get those two out of the way and then get into the other—or those two have all ready been closed, so— Barbeiro: If there is no discussion, I have a motion. I motion that we recommend to City Council request for annexation and zoning of 16.119 acres from RT to CG for proposed Resolution Business Park by G.L. Voigt Development to include staff comments. Hatcher: I second the motion. Borup: Any discussion. Norton: I have discussion. I believe we discussed the CG change to CN change. I'd like to make a friendly amendment to that motion that the CG be amended. Barbeiro: Thank you Commissioner Norton, you are correct and I wish to amend that to be a CN. Borup: Any other discussion. All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: Item number 2. Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman, I wish to recommend approval to City Council request for rezone of 37.64 acres from R-4 to L -O for proposed Resolution Business Park by G.L. Voigt Development with staff comments. Hatcher: Second the motion. Borup: Any discussion. All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: We have four more items. Again, comments have been concerning all of them. We have two items on the preliminary plat. No one item, sorry. Barbeiro: The discussion between myself and Commissioner Hatcher has to do with— we would like—here's what we're differing. I would like to see a development agreement between ACHD and the developer prior to any certificate of occupancy of any building. Meridian Planning and ning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 16 Hatcher: What I was trying to go for on a condition of approval from this board or recommended condition of approval to City Council would be that no certificate of occupancy would be issued to any of the proposed developments of this project until Overland Road improvements have been instructed. If that means the ice rink waits until 2002 or 2003, so be it. Barbeiro: You want a 5 lane road before anything opened. That is going to put a crimp in the developer, but I think if we had a development agreement with ACHD and the developer to have 5 lanes prior to fall 2002 when the high school opened, seeing how the development would be phased, I believe that would be correct and proper with this development. I would hate to see the development held back because the 5 lanes wasn't open for then as a condition they have to ensure that it is at least 3 lanes. If they are going to go out and do 3 lanes then ACHD is going to come in tear it out. That seems like a tremendous waste of public funds. Hatcher: Absolutely. If it boils down to working things out with ACRD. Borup: Oh it does and I agree with what your saying there, but your putting a requirement on the developer that they got no control over. Barbeiro: If we have a development agreement, that is something the developer and ACHD— Borup: ACHD don't do development agreements specifically do they. Just a written agreement. Hatcher: Putting money into a slush fund for future improvement on this project is not acceptable in my opinion. That is exactly what ACHD will do. I have no opposition of the project. In fact it is a wonderful project. Overland Road can not handle any capacity that this project would generate without the required improvements. Barbeiro: So ACHD does not do development agreements so this— Borup: I don't know if that is the terminology they use. I am not sure either way. I just have not heard that used before. Hatcher: Bruce can you comment on how ACHD typically has been dealing with those issues. Freckleton: Commissioner Hatcher and members of the commission Becky was just indicating that she is aware of one that they have done with Touchmark. I know they do non -development agreements when you have a plat and your doing it in phases if you want to record the entire plat without bonding or building the other phase. That is something we would have to address with them. Meridian Planning and ~ning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 17 Barbeiro: What would staff's recommendations be to insure that somehow we have an agreement amongst all the parties that this is going to be 5 lanes prior to a large portion of occupancy. I do not want to put a high school there without a five lane road. Hatcher: I personally don't want to stop the project. I don't want to stop construction of any of the projects on the site, but I don't want to see any of them operable until the road is done. Freckleton: My personal opinion would be unless we've got it nailed down when these things are going to happen, I would not even issue the building permit. Your looking at a can of worms if you issue a building permit and hold up occupancy without some dates being set. Hatcher: Okay so the building permit will not be issued until some sort of agreement is been reached without Ada County so that their construction schedule coincides with the projects construction schedule as deemed by the time line we are discussing. Basically what that does—I would say put one hand behind the developers back. Now we are putting both hands behind with the building permit because there is a lot of negotiations that have to go on between the developer and ACHD to meet these requirements. Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman would it be of any assistance to re -open the public hearing and net some comments from the developer on this. Hatcher: I don't think it is going to help. Borup: Have you got your thoughts together on what it is that you maybe recommending. Barbeiro: Well, now that I know there really is no such thing as a development with ACHD and my other concerns are that with the new high school, this would also stop any issuance of a building permit for a new high school to be built which would cause great problems with the school bond election coming up because of the state law requiring the school to allocate the funds for and spend the funds any certain time frame. If they can not get a building permit that may cause problems with the school bonding. Hatcher: Keep in mind as well as it was brought up by staff, school district does not need public hearing. As soon as phase one is done and Millenium Drive is built, that high school can go up. We have no control over that, so any conditions as of brought of that includes traffic, any conditions we want to impose on that high school have to be done during phase one. You could have 5000 high school kids going to high school on a 2 or 3 lane road. Borup: Do any Commissioner's remember what the going to the 3 lanes what that did to the service and what the road could handle. I am not finding that. Do you remember Meridian Planning and _ ning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 18 that Brad at all. What capacity was that going to add. Where I was going or at least the ACHD report is saying that the present configuration on Overland can handle a little less than 3000 additional vehicles. In the same paragraph they are saying that it would add 6. They are over 3000 short without —that's with the current road. I am not sure what the 3 lane would add to that capacity. I don't think it adds a lot of vehicle capacity. It will alleviate congestion. Hatcher: The third lane is a turning lane so it's going to allow people to stack up so that they won't be able to turn left because of on coming traffic. Borup: ACHD's statement is that a traffic signal is not warranted yet because traffic volumes are low enough. Barbeiro: That's Locust Grove and Overland, not Millenium. Borup: No, the side driveway is on Overland. I don't think they are taking the school into consideration on any of these figures. That adds a whole different aspect of it. Barbeiro: I need your assistance on this so we don't shut down the developer, we don't shut down the high school but we insure that there is a five lane road. Something that we don't seem to have a lot of control over. Borup: It is in the hand of ACRD. I don't have an answer to that. I think we can make some recommendations and let City Council look at it. Hatcher: The way we would want to word it to City Council would be that we recommend approval pending — Barbeiro: ACHD's commitment to widen that road. Hatcher: Commitment is not good enough. It has to be in writing. Barbeiro: Well, can the City work into a development agreement with ACHD as opposed to the developer. Hatcher: I don't think you want to bring the city into this. Borup: Why would the city want to. Barbeiro: We'd have a bigger gun than the developer does. Borup: To do what. Hatcher: We do? Meridian Planning and ping Commission May 9, 2000 Page 19 Barbeiro: Sounded good. Borup: Lets go ahead. Lets get a recommendation drafted and put the conditions on you'd like to and --. At this point I assume your going to incorporate staff comments. Barbeiro: I have some comments within those too. Mr. Chairman, I move that we recommend approval to City Council request for preliminary plat of 17 lots on 107.06 acres in proposed L -O zone and C -N zones for proposed Resolution Business Park by G.L. Voigt Development to include staff comments making note of Item 8 on page 6 that we would recommend an easement as opposed to a separately platted buffer— Swartley: Mr. Chairman, Mr. Barbeiro what are you trying to do an easement as opposed to a buffer? Barbeiro: As I read it, the staff wanted to have a separate common lot as opposed to an easement. Swartley: Oh okay. I understand. Barbeiro: That Item number 10 that applicant will go ahead and build a privacy fence, Item number 11, the applicant will built a vehicular access over the Hunter Lateral between site B and site A, included in that the developer will put a operable gate there with cooperation of the Meridian Fire Department to prevent student crossing to get over to Locust Grove. Help me out with number 12. The applicant wanted a minimum of 35 foot landscape buffer. We are going to allow them to put a meandering sidewalk as opposed to a sidewalk right up to the easement. Page 8, item 7 allowing them to— Swartley: Mr. Barbeiro could you repeat the numbers 10 and 11 for me please. Barbeiro: Number 10 were we—the developer build the privacy fence. Number 11 in his cross access between site B and site A we put an emergency gate or a gate between the two with the cooperation of the Meridian Fire Department. This is all subject to the recommendation of ACHD and the Meridian Fire Department. Borup: That was on the motion. Hatcher: Road improvements, refresh my memory. We going to tack that onto the preliminary plat or conditional use permit. Borup: I thought you were doing it on the conditional use permit. I think they lumped it all together. The traffic is going to be generated by the conditional use permit project not by the plat. Hatcher: Okay, lets see if I got this right. Meridian Planning and ning Commissio^ May 9, 2000 Page 20 Borup: ACHD's comments addressed everything all together. They combined all their comments as a project as a whole. Hatcher: The last outstanding issue I wanted to add to Commissioner Barbeiro's motion is that a written agreement between the developer and ACHD that coordinates and synchronizes construction completion of a 5 lane Overland improvement prior to the completion of phase one occupancy. The agreement be submitted to the City of Meridian prior to the issuance of a building permit. Norton: I would like to add to that motion that a revised preliminary plat to reflect the changes that have been discussed be submitted to the city prior to the City Council meeting. Borup: I think that was in the staff comments all ready. Hatcher: So you made the motion, we amended it so your going to have to second it. Barbeiro: To include their comments from Commissioner's Hatcher and Norton in the motion. Norton: I'll Second. Borup: Any other discussion. Seeing none, all in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Barbeiro: I wish to recommend approval to City Council request for conditional use permit for proposed planned commercial development consisting of multi family commercial, and LDS seminary in proposed L -O and C -N zoning by G.L. Voigt Development to incorporate all of our notes from Item number 3. Borup: This was a conceptual concept that was made mention earlier. This is a conceptual approval of the project as a whole. Barbeiro: And to include that page 10, item 11 storage areas that we waive the requirement for storage areas, page 10 item 12 that we waive the requirement for a maintenance building. Borup: Actually that should come under item 5. Barbeiro: Thank you Mr. Chairman. You are correct. (Inaudible) make the recommendation for approval for incorporating all the comments from Item number 3. Hatcher: I will second that. Meridian Planning and ning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 21 Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: Okay now item number 5 which is the conditional use permit for the apartment complex. Barbeiro: I wish to recommend approval to City Council request for conditional use permit for proposed 200 unit luxury apartment complex to be zoned L-0 for proposed Resolution Business Park by Desert West Properties, LLC to include all comments from Item 3 and Item 4 and from page 10 item 11 the storage areas waiving the requirement for storage areas, page 10 item 12 waiving the requirement for a maintenance building, page 11 CP apartment complex, item number 2 where staff recommends a number of units constructed in phase one be limited to a maximum of 30, make that a maximum of 140. Hatcher: I second the motion. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman I wish to recommend approval to City Council request for conditional use permit for an ice arena consisting of office, pro shop, fitness center, restaurant, locker rooms, equipment storage and arenas zoned L-0 by Pat McKeegan to incorporate staff comments and comments from Item 3,4, and 5. Hatcher: Before this last issue is voted on, the preliminary plat did we property address the secondary emergency access to the high school. Borup: No we didn't. We spend time talking about it and then did not get it in the motion. We need to address that. We need to go back and amend the motion. Norton: I second the motion on number 6. Borup: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman, I wish to return to item number 3, the preliminary plat for the 17 lots and make an amendment to include the or note the developer will work in conjunction with the school district and arrange a secondary emergency access through their property apart from the primary access on Millenium Drive. Borup: Do you want to be more specific. Meridian Planning and . iing Commission May 9, 2000 Page 22 Hatcher: I think you want to be more specific in location. What 1 just heard you say is a second emergency access through the current development. I would prefer to have a second emergency access through break away bollards down at Raven Hill. Borup: The road is all ready there. The stub street is there. It is all ready dead ended. Hatcher: It is a stub street. You'd have to dead end it with emergency bollards. Barbeiro: Is the school property also part— Borup: That is a separate lot and they will not be coming before us for the school property. Hatcher: It is not part of phase one but it is part of this development. Barbeiro: I would concur. We have a secondary access from the south through one of the two roads that are coming in. Borup: Emergency break away bollards not direct vehicle access. I think that sounds consistent with ACHD wants also. The no vehicle access is consistent. We need a whole site. Hatcher: You have the adjacent Subdivisions. Borup: What do you want, street names. There is only two streets to choose from. Two out of the two. Go over and talk to staff. Let them choose a street and it not come from the north. Bruce, do you have any idea how man times in the last five years the fire department has ever gone through the break away bollard. Okay that's what I felt. Did you hear that comment Commissioner's? Commissioner's: No. Borup: As far as Bruce has understand it the fire department has never had to use emergency access and the break away bollards. I am saying it needs to be there, but its not going to be a traffic issue. Hatcher: The one street we are talking about is East Blue Tick Street. The other road appears to be South Red Cloud Avenue. Borup: The reason I asked that question maybe for anyone living in those areas, the emergency access not be a traffic—it hasn't happened yet in this town, but like anything it is an emergency. It is there for emergency, so its there. Brad did you have some input. The amended motion was to state a southern emergency access. Meridian Planning and ping Commission May 9, 2000 Page 23 Barbeiro: A southern emergency access with break away bollards and not regular traffic. Borup: No specific street? Hatcher: No specific streets required. Borup: So, if they can come up with another street, that's fine. Barbeiro: Before we make the final vote, lets see if staff has anything. Borup: The motion that is in effect now is that there be an emergency access from one of the southern streets, not from the northern. We did not specify beyond that. Did you have anything to add. Hawkins Clark: Commissioner just as a suggestion that was provided which has not been considered. As far as emergency there is here on Locust Grove, as I understand the goal of your discussion as a Commission is to help get emergency access so that Overland is not the only way. Another one on Locust. One suggestion is to provide on the southern portion emergency ingress egress here on the southern portion north of this LDS church that is being built between the retail and the daycare which does access the high school site. Borup: So, that could be a third option. Hawkins Clark: Could be in terms of accessibility and response time for EMS, police, fire. Certainly an argument can be made for greater direct access as compared to going through either Los Alamitos or Raven Hill. END OF SIDE TWO Borup: to work out as far as the access for them. Barbeiro: Okay lets go ahead and say that additional access the developer will work with the school district of the options themselves for along the southwest boundaries. Commissioner Norton, does that work for you? Okay. Hatcher: I second the amended motion. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Norton: Mr. Chairman I would like to have a little more discussion on number 5 with the apartment complex. 140 apartments, does that also include the club house? I'd like to Meridian Planning and ning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 24 amend the motion then to include the club house to be constructed along with the 140 apartments. Borup: Is that different that the original or what the developer was planning. And the club house. Norton: Okay, I'll withdraw that. Borup: Anything or are we ready to move on. Let's take a short break. 7. TABLED FROM APRIL 11'2000: REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL 77 FOOT HIGH POLE SIGN FOR CHEVRON/MCDONALDS BY EAGLE PARTNER, LLC -603 S. EAGLE ROAD: Borup: This item was tabled to allow more information which I think you've each received in your packets. Do we have any comments, questions or discussion or anybody ready for a motion. Norton: I am ready to make a motion on number 7. 1 would like to recommend to City Council the request for modification of conditional use permit to allow additional 77 foot high pole sign for Chevron/McDonalds by Eagle Partners be denied based on using the Comprehensive Plan as a guide only and taking into consideration the following: 1. The pylon sign was not addressed in the development agreement with the city on March 9, 1999. 2. This commission made a decision in June of 1999 that a pylon sign is inappropriate. 3. A Chevron pylon sign doesn't set an appropriate tone for entering the Magic View Subdivision. 4. This pylon sign is too close proximity to a neighborhood. Hatcher: I second the motion. Borup: Discussion. Barbeiro: When we voted in June of 1999 on this issue, the two primary items that I saw were that the light from this sign would be detrimental to the neighbors and that there was presented an ordinance that only freeway frontage could have such a sign. In our last— Borup: Freeway frontage or freeway business. Barbeiro: Freeway business I believe it was. And, as I recall—do we have such an ordinance. I was unable to find such an ordinance saying that freeway business or freeway frontage is a requirement for a pylon sign. Borup: I don't believe so. Will Berg From: jansyl@micron.net Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 9:07 AM To: bergw@ci.meridian.id.us Subject: Fw: G.L. Voigt Development of Resolution Business Park City Council Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 5:39 PM Subject: G.L. Voigt Development of Resolution Business Park City Council To: Meridian City Council Re: G.L. Voigt Development Mr. Berg, T re/w S 11, 1'2, �'>>, (Ar J U IN - is 7[?0 CITY OF MERIDIAN Tammy DeWeerd suggested I send the following information to you in the event I am unable to attend the 6/6/00 meeting regarding G. L. Voigt and the development of Resolution Business Park. I currently reside in the Summerfield Subdivision at the NE corner of Ustick and North Locust Grove in the city of Meridian. This subdivision was developed by G.L. Voigt ( a few phases were not, but I am addressing the ones that were). The developer was responsible for the perimeter fence. A fence was erected, however the section on Locust Grove is falling over after only three years. The developer was responsible for the pressurized irrigation system. A trouble -prone pooly designed system was installed causing several homeowners unneccessary expenses. The developer was responsible for drainage in the subdivsion. Houses were built such that water drains to the adjacent house to the rear. No drainage was installed between the 'park' and the adjacent lots causing the park to drain to the adjacent properties. Drainage problems occur in the street storm drains, they appear to be under -sized. The deveoper was responsible for each lot being built. There is one home in Summerfield that has been under construction for 6 years. The developer was supposed to provide a common area 230 x 140, large enough to accomodate a soccer field. I still haven't come across that yet. If the Council decides to approve the development of Resolution Park by G. L.. Voigt what, if any, checks and balances will there be to assure that: a) the project won't fall apart in 3 years b) quality design will be used c) drainage problems will be addressed and resolved prior to construction d) the project will be completed e) the developer will provide all that has been agreed upon Thank you, Jan Sylvester 1775 E. Summerheights Drive Meridian, Idaho 6/6/00 83642 208 8845680 6/6/00 June 15, 2000 CUP 00-023 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 20, 2000 APPLICANT Cole Associates Architects ITEM NO. N REQUEST Findings - CUP for Generations Plaza II for the demolition of an existing auto garage structure and construction of a new two-story retail / office building in an OT zone - east of 1 st and East Pine Avenue AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS Findings forthcoming Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ��I - 7,Z60 VVOAd_ LVY\ S � June 15, 2000 CUP 00-015 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 20, 2000 APPLICANT G.L. Voigt / Overland LLC ITEM NO. K REQUEST Findings - CUP for ice arena consisting of office, pro shop, fitness center restaurant, locker room and equipment storage for proposed Resolution Bus. Park south of Overland Road and east of Locust Grove Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS See attached Findings Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Sw l�rn614 P'\ interoffice MEMORANDUM FY cFIvED To: William G. Berg, Jr. JUN 1 5 2000 From: William F. Nicho4o CITY OF �L,, Y D AN Subject: PAT McKEEGAN (REPRESENTATIVE FOR LEE SMITH ICE ARENA) File No.: CUP -00-015 Date: June 14, 2000 Will: . Please find attached the original FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS, pursuant to action of the Council at their June 6, 2000, meeting. The Findings will be on the Council's agenda for their June 20, 2000, meeting. I have also attached the original of the ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, if the Council approves the FINDINGS. Please serve copies of both documents upon the Applicant and appropriate departments. If you have any questions please advise. msg/ZAWork\M\Meridian 15360M\Resolution Business Park A7 -R7- CUP PP\C1kLtrCUPffds&0rder15 RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300' VAN AUKER RONALD W 3084 E LANARK MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 2600 E OVERLAND RD PECK CURTIS D & KIM L 6149 N MEEKER PL STE 250 BOISE ID 83713-1568 2400 E OVERLAND RD HOWELL WILLARD & ANGELA PO BOX 848 EAGLE ID 83616-0000 2200 E OVERLAND RD 2270 E OVERLAND RD CONTRACTORS EQUIP SUPLY CO INC 2000 E OVERLAND MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 PLAYGROUND INC 4098 N JULLION WAY BOISE ID 83704-2763 1780 E OVERLAND RD JE DOUBLE D LLC 4601 N FIVE MILE BOISE ID 83713-0000 1822 E OVERLAND RD OVERLAND 16 LLC 6223 N DISCOVERY WAY BOISE ID 83713-0000 E OVERLAND RD VOIGT GARY L AND GROVES C R & R L AND BASS ROBERT & DANA 1908 JENNIE LEE DR IDAHO FALLS ID 83404-6159 1965 E OVERLAND RD KENAI PARTNERS LLC 6223 N DISCOVERY WAY BOISE ID 83713-0000 E OVERLAND RD JOINT SCHOOL DIST #2 911 N MERIDIAN RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-2241 E OVERLAND RD CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LDS 50 E NORTH FLOOR 22ND SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150-0002 S LOCUST GROVE RD 1V 200 E. Cotton Ave., Ste. 201 Meridien, ID 83642 Phone; (208)884-5533 Fax (208)088.68.'54 To: Becky Bumutt From Sonya Day Fac 376-8713 Datec Irdi s 0 RECEIVED CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE Phonec Penes: 2 (Indudng cancer) R« Resolution Bus, Parte CC: Will 6erg 8$$- qZI $ ❑ Urgnt 0 For Review ❑ Plow Commout ❑ Please R*ly ❑ Pham Recycle •Gommanls MAY 15 '00 1E:52 2088886854 PAGE.01 Memo To: Becky Bowcutt Fran Brad Hawkins -Clark' c CC: Shari Stiles, Will Berg, Bruce Freckleton Date: 05/15/00 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE Re: Fire Department Approval of Gates in Resolution Business Park (File No. PP -00-06) Becky, As you know, on 5/9/00 the P8Z Commission recommended approval to City Council of the Resolution Business Parts applications. All six applications are scheduled for hearing at the June 6, 2000 Council meeting. One of the pending items that the Commission included in their motion was to install an "operable gate" in the new road between Site A and 6 with the cooperation of the Fire Department in order to prevent students crossing over to Locust Grove. The sizeexact Placement, and type of construction all neer) to be finalized. Please work with Kenny , Bowers, Fire Chief, on this and obtain written approval from Kenny per to the meeting. Also, prior to the June 60 meeting, please submit a revised copy of the plat showing the new vehicular cross access between Site A and B, the preferred emergency access point (three options were discussed by P&Z), and other revisions as required in the Staff report. If Possible, it would also be helpful to have details from ACHD on what warrants would be required in order to justify the new Locust/Overland signal. Thanks, Brad • Page 1 MAY 15 '00 16:52 z. 2068886854 PAGE.02 a MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING: / U G�f "l/ Ze.?G�7 0 APPLICANT' 6• l` �U l � AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: REQUEST' 1 Ge 14Y-ej(,to- (Zee fn1u z4A AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: �(I ADA STREET NAME COMMITTE : n�1i CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS 14:20 MAY 09, 2000 � TEL N0: (208) 387-639 #2605 PAGE: 2/13 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT MAY 0 4 �ooa Planning and Development Division City of lieridia n Development Application Report C.'itV Clerk O;:fi� F Preliminary Plat — Resolution Business Park l MAZ00-004/MCUP00-015/MCUP00-016/ MCUP00-017 Locust Grove Rd/Overland Road An application for a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City of Meridian for a 17 -lot residential and commercial subdivision on 107.06 -acres. The applicant is also requesting conditional use and rezone approval. The City has forwarded the application to ACHD for review and comment. The site is located at the southeast corner of Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. This development is estimated to generate 9,430 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic study. Roads impacted by this development: Locust Grove Road Overland Road ACHD Commission Date — May 3, 2000 - 12:00 p.m. Resolution Subdivision Page I 14:21 NAY 09, 2000 �-� TEL N0: (208) 387-6391 Facts and Findings: A. General Information Owner — G.I. Voigt Applicant - Same R-4, RT - Existing zoning L -O, C -G - Requested zoning 107.06 - Acres 17 - Proposed lots 200 - Proposed multi -family dwelling units 346,000 - Square feet of proposed building 125,000 -square feet of Office building 145,000 -square feet of Retail building 57,000 -square feet of an Ice Rink 19,000 -square feet of Day Care Center Meridian High School 2,300 - Total lineal feet of proposed public streets 286 - Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) West Ada - Impact Fee Service Area Meridian - Impact Fee Assessment District Locust Grove Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count 3,552 on 7-16-99 A -Existing Level of Service C -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 950 -feet of frontage 50 to 70 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) #2605 PAGE: 3/13 Locust Grove Road is improved with two lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. The segment of Locust Grove Road abutting the site is not listed in the current Five Year Work Program for reconstruction. Overland Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count 11,422 on 11-30-99 (west of Eagle Road) Traffic count 9,916 on 11-23-99 (west of Locust Grove Road) D -Existing Level of Service E -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 2,640 -feet of frontage 50 to 70 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Resolution Subdivision Page 2 14:21 MAY 09, 2000 ^ TEL N0: (208) 387-6391^ #2605 PAGE 4113 Overland Rod is improved with two lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. The segment of Overland Road abutting the site is listed in the current Five -Year Work Program for reconstruction to 5 -lane in FY (2004). Blue Tick Street/Brandys Jewel Street Local streets with no bike lane designation No traffic count available 50 -feet of frontage 50 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 50 -feet required right-of-way for their extensions Blue Tick Street and Brandys Jewel Street are improved as 37 -foot street section with curb, gutter and sidewalk. B. On March 27, 2000, the District Planning and Development staff inspected this site and evaluated the transportation system in the vicinity. On March 31, 2000, the staff met as the District's Technical Review Committee and reviewed the impacts of this proposed development on the District`s transportation system. The results of that analysis constitute the following Facts and Findings and recommended Site Specific Requirements. C. Locust Grove Road has 3,522 existing vehicle trips per day, which is a Level of Service A (LOS A). An acceptable Level of Service for this segment of roadway is D (LOS D) or 14,000 vehicle trips per day. The proposed application will add approximately 3,000 vehicle trips per day on Locust Grove Road. D. Current traffic counts indicate that Overland Road carries 11,422 vehicle trips per day (VTD). The planning threshold for Overland Road is 14, 000 VDT with its current configuration. When Overland Road is rebuilt to five lanes, the planning threshold for Overland Road will be 33,000 VTD. The proposed application will add approximately 6,000 vehicle trips per day on Overland Road, therefore the existing, plus project traffic exceeds the planning threshold of Overland Road with its current configuration. When Overland Road is rebuilt to five -lanes, the roadway will be adequate to accommodate the traffic generated from this site. E. The Eagle Road/Overland Road intersection operates at a Level of Service E/F threshold, and is listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The subject site's additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. The District has already initiated a project (to be started within the next few months) to provide additional turn lanes and make other capacity enhancements to improve the intersections' operating characteristics. The improvement plans have not been finalized but the anticipation is for a substantial increase in capacity. F. The Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection operates at a Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The subject site's additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. G. A traffic study was submitted for the Resolution Subdivision site development plan. The key findings of the traffic study include the following: Resolution Subdivision Page 3 14:22 MRY 09, 2000 ^ TEL N0: (288) 387-6391 #2605 PACE 5113 • The proposed development is expected to generate 12,495 total daily vehicle trips. An estimated 3,045 trips are pass -by trips, leaving 9,430 new daily vehicle trips added to the adjacent roadway system. • The Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection currently operates at Level of Service (LOS) F. Because Meridian Road is a principal arterial, LOS E is acceptable under current District policy. The intersection exceeds the allowable Level of Service. • Under "existing plus project" traffic volumes (Year 2005), the Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection is expected to operate at Level of Service (LOS) F. The District has currently programmed a project to upgrade Overland Road to create additional capacity. The design and magnitude of the improvements have not yet been determined. Because Meridian Road is a principal arterial, LOS E is acceptable under current District policy. • The Locust Grove Road/Overland Road intersection currently operates at an overall Level of Service (LOS) A. The intersection is STOP controlled only on the two Locust Grove Road approaches. Left turns from northbound Locust Grove on to westbound Overland Road operate at an LOS F condition. If a traffic signal were constructed with the existing traffic volumes and roadway geometry, the intersection would operate at an overall LOS B. • Under the existing traffic volumes, LA4q R@ad and Locust Grove Road operates at an arterial LOS of A with volume -to -capacity ratios of less than 0.35 during peak hour conditions. • The Year 2020 traffic forecast of 18,000 vehicles per day for Overland Road indicates the need to widen the roadway from two to five lanes. The widening is desirable from an operational and safety standpoint and is required within 500 feet of the Eagle Road intersection. • The Year 2020 traffic forecast of 8,700 vehicles per day for Locust Grove Road does not indicate the need to add capacity. • The forecast traffic volumes at the Locust Grove Road intersection with Overland Road justify a traffic signal under existing plus project traffic volumes. The applicant should be required to provide 25 -percent of the cost for the traffic signal, which is $37,500.00. The District will construct the traffic signal when it is warranted. • The site driveways on Overland Road are expected to have traffic volumes low enough that traffic signals are not needed. • The new public street intersection on Overland Road is expected to have traffic volumes that warrant a traffic signal. The applicant should be required to provide 75 -percent of the cost to construct the traffic signal, which is $112,500.00 (total cost is $150,000). The District will construct the traffic signal when it is warranted. • The site driveway intersections on Locust Grove Road are expected to have traffic volumes low enough that traffic signals are not needed, however, all the intersections on Locust Grove Road will require the construction of a center turn lane. • All the intersections on Overland Road will require the construction of a center turn lane. Due to the locations of the intersections and the taper lengths required for the turn lanes, the applicant would be required to add another traffic lane on Overland Road abutting the entire site. • The consultant was not aware of ACHD's project to widen the Overland Road/Eagle Road intersection when the TIS was performed. The Eagle Road/Overland Road intersection was identified to operate at Level of Service (LOS) F under existing and build out conditions. The District is adding turn -lanes at the intersection this fiscal year, Resolution Subdivision Page 4 14:23 MAY 09, 2000 TEL N0: (208) 387-639;,.., #2605 PAGE 6/13 which will improve the operations of the intersection to an adequate Level of Service D (LOS D). Overland Road is scheduled for reconstruction from two to five lanes in FY 2004. When the roadway is reconstructed to five lanes, the intersection will operate at an adequate Level of Service C (LOS C). H. The applicant is proposing a stub street to the south property line located 1,000 -feet west of the east property line. District Staff supports the location of the stub street. The applicant should provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub street with a temporary easement provided to the District. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that; "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. I. The applicant is proposing a stub street to the east property line located 400 -feet south of Overland Road. District Staff supports the location of the stub street. The applicant should provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub street with a temporary easement provided to the District. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that; "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. The improvement of Overland Road abutting this development is included in the District's current Five Year Work Program. District policy requires the applicant to provide a $52,800.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the parcel (approximately 2,640 -feet) prior to District approval of a final plat, whichever occurs first. K. The improvement of Locust Grove Road abutting this development is not included in the District's current Five Year Work Program. District policy requires the applicant to construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel prior to District approval of a final plat. The sidewalk should be located two feet within the new right-of-way of Locust Grove Road. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. L. The applicant is proposing two driveways on Locust Grove Road. The driveways are located as follows: ♦ The northern driveway is proposed to be located 440 -feet south of Overland Road. ♦ The southern driveway is proposed to be located 690 -feet south of Overland Road. Peacock Street intersects Locust Grove Road from the west approximately 550 -feet south of Overland Road and Labrador Street approximately 1,100 -feet south of Overland Road. District policy requires the applicant to locate driveways on Locust Grove Road a minimum of 440 -feet south of Overland Road and 220 -feet from the streets on the west side of Locust Grove Road. The applicant's proposed driveways do not meet the required offset from Peacock Street on the west side of Locust Grove Road. The applicant should be required to locate the northern driveway to align with Peacock Street to west, and the southern driveway should be located 75 - feet north of the south property line. The driveways should be constructed 30 to 35 -foot wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the roadway. The applicant should be required to Resolution Subdivision Page 5 14:24 MAY 09, 2000 I-, TEL N0: (208) 387-639;, , #2605 PAGE: 7/13 provide 100 -feet of stacking for both the inbound and out -bound travel lanes for the driveway. Coordinate the design of the driveways with District staff. M. The applicant is proposing three driveways on Overland Road. The driveways are located as follows: ♦ 480 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 930 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 1,280 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of stacking for this driveway. All the driveways align with existing driveways on the north side of the road, which meets District policy. The driveways should be constructed 30 to 35 -feet wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the existing roadway edge. N. The applicant is proposing to construct two public roads off Overland Road. The roads are proposed to be located: ♦ 320 -feet west of the east property line: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to locate driveways off this public street a minimum of 100 -feet south of Overland Road. The roadway should be constructed as a 40 - foot street section with curbs gutters and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58 -feet of right-of-way. ♦ 850 -feet west of the east property line: based on the submitted traffic study this roadway should be signalized and driveways on this roadway should be located a minimum of 175 -feet south of Overland Road and consecutive driveways should be required to align or offset a minimum of 150 -feet. The roadway should be constructed as a 46 -foot street section with curbs, gutters, and a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 64 -feet of right-of-way. This road should be signalized. The applicant should be required to construct a signal for the new intersection. Coordinate the design of the signalized intersection with District staff. The District should provide 25 -percent of the cost of the signal. ♦ The applicant is proposing an east/west road located 400 -feet south of Overland Road: the applicant should be required to locate driveways on the new roadway a minimum of 50 -feet from a public street intersection. The applicant is proposing a traffic circles within the roadway. The street section around the traffic circle should be constructed 29 -feet wide. A YIELD sign should be installed at all approaches into the islands and directional islands should be constructed in the street approaches to the traffic circles to guide motorists in the proper direction. The pedestrian crossings shall be located at the intersection to improve pedestrian/vehicular recognition and safety. Coordinate the traffic control plan and location of the pedestrian crossings with District staff. Resolution Subdivision Page 6 14:25 MAY 09, 2000 ,1 TEL N0: (208) 387-639;..1 #2605 PAGE: 8/13 In order to provide safe turning movements into the driveways and streets on Overland Road and avoid a continuous meandering travel path a continuous turning lane is required from Locust Grove Road to the east property line. The design will provide turning movement at all driveways and streets through and including Locust Grove and new east -west street. O. ACHD's Park & Ride Division Staff have indicated the need for a park and ride location at the applicant's site. The District requests that applicant grant the District an easement for a 10 to 12 - space Park & Ride area at this site. Commuteride staff will contact the applicant to coordinate the location of the Park & Ride area. P. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that Tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Pat Nelson at 387-6160. Q. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, it is recommended that the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. R. A Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) is formed with a coordinator that works as a liaison between businesses and private and public transportation providers to increase the use of alternative transportation and other trip reduction measures (shuttle buses, bus pass programs, vanpools, carpools, bicycle and walking enhancements). An annual survey will be required of the TMA/TMO to monitor participation in alternative transportation programs and forwarded to the ACHD Commuteride Office. S. District policy states that direct access to arterials and collectors is normally restricted and that the developer shall try to use combined access points. In accordance with District policy the applicant should be required to provide a recorded cross access easement among the lots within the proposed subdivision for use to access the public streets prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits). T. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Locust Grove Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. U. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Overland Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. V. Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with past action by the District the applicant should be required to pave all driveway_ s their full width and at least 30 -feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Overland Road and Locust Grove Road and install pavement tapers wifli 15 -foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. W. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the undeveloped parcels abutting this site may be required upon review of a future application for this site. Resolution Subdivision Page 7 14:25 MRY 09, 2000 TEL N0: (208) 387-6391 #2605 PRGE: 9/13 X. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, may be placed on future development of this parcel. Y. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the school parcel abutting this site should be extended upon review of a future application for this site. Z. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will require improvement in order to accommodate the additional traffic generated by this proposed development. The Overland Road/Meridian Road intersection currently operates at deficient Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of the 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The reconstruction of the intersection by the District is not listed in ACHD's Five year Work Program. The following Site Specific Requirements and Standard Requirements must be met or provided for prior to ACHD approval of the final plat: Special Recommendation to City of Meridian: In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Ms Pat Nelson at 387-6160. 2. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) should be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. ACHD's Park & Ride Division Staff have indicated the need for a park and ride location at the applicant's site. The District requests that applicant grant the District an easement for a 10 to 12 -space Park & Ride area at this site. Commuteride staff will contact the applicant to coordinate the location of the Park & Ride area. 4. The transportation system will require improvement in order to accommodate the additional traffic generated by additional development. The Overland Road/Meridian Road intersection currently operates at a deficient Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. Additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. The reconstruction of the Overland Road/Meridian Road Street intersection is not currently listed in ACHD's Five ,year Work Program. Resolution Subdivision Page 8 14:26 MAY 09, 2000 f.� TEL N0: (208) 387-6391 r-� #2605 PRGE: 10/13 Site Specific Requirements: Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Overland Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #193. 2. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #193. Provide a stub street to the south property line located 1,000 -feet west of the east property line. Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. 4. Provide a stub street to the east property line located 400 -feet south of Overland Road. Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD u7ILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. 5. Provide a $112,500.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for 75 -percent of the cost to construct a traffic signal on Overland Road for the new collector roadway. The District will construct the signal when it is warranted. 6. Provide a $37,500.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for 25 -percent of the cost of constructing a traffic signal at the Overland Road/Locust Grove Road intersection. The District will construct the signal when it is warranted. 7. Provide a $52,800.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the parcel (approximately 2,640 -feet) prior to District approval of a final plat, whichever occurs first. Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel prior to District approval of a final plat. Locate the sidewalk two feet within the new right-of-way of Locust Grove Road. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. Resolution Subdivision Page 9 14:27 MAY 09, 2000 TEL N0: (208) 387-6393 #2605 PAGE: 11/13 9. Locate two driveways on Locust Grove Road as follows: ♦ The northern driveway shall be located 550 -feet south of Overland Road to align with Peacock Street to flee west. ♦ The southern driveway shall be located 75 -feet north of the south property line. The driveways shall be constructed 30 to 35 -foot wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the roadway. Provide 100 -feet of stacking for both the inbound and out -bound travel lanes for the driveways. Coordinate the design of the driveways with District staff. 10. Locate three driveways on Overland Road as follows: ♦ 480 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 930 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 1,280 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 100 -feet of stacking for this driveway. The driveways shall be constructed 30 to 35 -feet wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the existing roadway edge. 11. Locate two public roads as follows: ♦ off Overland Road 320 -feet west of the east property line: locate driveways off this public street a minimum of 100 -feet south of Overland Road. The roadway shall be constructed as a 40 -foot street section with curbs gutters and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58 -feet of right-of-way. ♦ off Overland Road 850 -feet west of the east property line: driveways off this roadway shall be located a minimum of 175 -feet south of Overland Road and consecutive driveways are required to align or offset a minimum of 150 -feet. The roadway shall be constructed as a 46 -foot street section with curbs, gutters, and a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 64 -feet of right-of-way. The applicant shall be required to construct a signal for the roadway/Overland Road intersection. Coordinate the design of the signalized intersection with District staff. 12. Locate an east/west road 400 -feet south of Overland Road: locate driveways on the east/west roadway a minimum of 50 -feet from a public street intersection. The traffic circle within the roadway shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 29 -feet wide street section around the traffic circle. A YIELD sign shall be installed at all approaches into the island and a directional island shall be constructed in the street approaches to the traffic circle to guide motorists in the proper direction. The pedestrian crossings shall be located at the intersection to improve pedestrian/vehicular recognition and safety. Coordinate the design of the buffer circle, the traffic control plan and location of the pedestrian crossings with District staff. 13. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, shall be placed on future development of this parcel. Resolution Subdivision Page 10 14:28 MRY 09, 2000 TEL N0: (208) 387-639 11-1 #2605 PRGE: 12113 14. Construct a center turn lane on Overland Road abutting the entire site. 15. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the school parcel abutting this site should be extended upon review of a future application for this site. 16. Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Overland Road and Locust Grove Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. Standard Requirements: A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity The written request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for ACHD Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its original decision. The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. 3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 5. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 5. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. Resolution Subdivision Page 11 14:28 MAY 09, 2000 TEL NO: (208) 387-6391^ #2605 PAGE: 13/13 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 8. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 9. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusion of Law: ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development Division at 387-6170. Submitted bv: Commission Action: Planning and Development Staff May 3, 2000 Resolution Subdivision Page 12 MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING — APRIL 11 2000 The regular scheduled meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Keith Borup. MEMBERS PRESENT: Keith Borup, Sally Norton, Kent Brown, Tom Barbeiro, Richard Hatcher. OTHERS PRESENT: David Swartley, Bruce Freckleton, Brad Hawkins Clark, Christie Richardson, Ray Voss, Will Berg. Borup: Good evening ladies and gentlemen. We'd like to begin the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting regular scheduled meeting for Tuesday April 11th. First item is minutes from the March 14th meeting. Any comments, questions, additions on the minutes. Does that mean no. Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman I wish to make a motion that we approve the minutes from the March 14th meeting as submitted. Norton: I second. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: 3 AYES, 1 ABSTAIN Borup: Item number 1 and 2 is tabled from the previous meeting. Items 3,4,5,6 are continued public hearings all on the same project. I'd like to hear a staff report first on the status. We continued awaiting the ACHD report, which we have not received. Brad have you got some update on that. Hawkins Clark: Yes Commission Borup and Commissioner's, the first two items as you know, you closed the public hearings. The others, particularly the plat, was continued for the purpose of receiving the Ada County Highway District report. Our department spoke with Ada County Highway District this afternoon and they have requested that, number one, the packet that you received that had the draft ACHD staff report be omitted and not entered into the record. There was some mistakes and confusion on that. Number two, the date for the resolution ACHD commission meeting was set for tomorrow night. That has been moved off of tomorrow nights agenda. There has not been a new date set. They are in the process, I understand, of working with the developer on several major issues related to the road widening and other issues of dedication and such. Those discussions are happening with ACHD staff and the developer and a revised report has not been submitted for your consideration. Borup: Thank you. Any questions from the Commissioner's. Brad, do you know whether the developers representative is here tonight. Meridian Planning and Zoo, ,g Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 Page 2 Hawkins Clark: I believe Becky Bowcutt from Briggs Engineering did call. I did not speak with her but she did call and state she was not coming. There may be someone else present. I don't know. Borup: Before we open the hearing, is there any one here representing the application? Thank you. Commissioner's in light of the fact that these were continued for a specific purpose, receiving the ACHD report, is there any motion you'd like to make. I think we could deal with all six items probably in one motion. Norton: Mr. Commissioner. Does staff know when we'd get a ACHD report. Hawkins Clark: We do not. Norton: Mr. Chairman, can we state a meeting date which we could continue this. Borup: If we continue, it would need to be to a date certain. Hatcher: Are there standard scheduled meetings now. Borup: Not yet. I don't think—we won't have anything from ACHD in 2 weeks any way. Hatcher: I make a motion then that we take the first six items on our agenda and continue them until our regularly scheduled meeting which would be May 9th. Barbeiro: I'll second the motion. Borup: Motion and second to continue items 1 through 6 for May 9th meeting. Any discussion. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: 3 AYES, 1 ABSTAIN Borup: All right, nine minutes after and we've gone through 6 items. Norton: Would it be possible to move number 15 up next as the applicant had submitted a letter. Borup: I think the applicants letter was submitted concerned that it might be bumped from the agenda, was my understanding. I think out of fairness to the other applicants maybe lets at least take the next two and then and then discuss that. That sound all right. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Special Meeting March 22, 2000 Page 40 this side that would allow access to the commercial property but (inaudible) access off Overland and off of Millennial Way. Borup: Any one else like to come forward. Babbit: Carl Babbit, 1671 E. Time Zone. I have a question. They are talking about the ice rink going in 2001 and then this apartment, is it going in 2001 too. So they are going at the same time? So, the road that would go back to the high school would be put in because of the ice rink all ready, correct? Where they are doing it in two phases, I understand what they are saying, that they have to do pretty phase to make it work. I am wondering is if they would be required to go ahead and put the road through to the high school road—the collector. Don't have to do that second phase now but in regard of doing the (inaudible) if they would be required to put the road through to there, that would give two exits out of that. Borup: We'll find out an answer on that. Good question. END OF SIDE FOUR MOTION TO CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE ACHD REPORT WAS APPROVED. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED FOR ITEM NUMBER 6—BRAD HAWKINS CLARK STAFF REPORT WAS MADE. APPLICANT PATRICK MCKEEGAN GIVING TESTIMONY. MARION BARTELL GAVE TESTIMONY. MICHAEL CLARK GAVE TESTIMONY. HARMON AVERA GAVE TESTIMONY. QUESTIONS ANSWERED BY PATRICK MCKEEGAN. Malfunction of tape machine prevented this from being recorded. McKeegan: For the restaurant portion of the facility we are going to have—if it is allowed by law or wherever the law allows, we've—one time we talked about putting in a bar. We decided not to do that. It is going to be a food related with probably with beer and wine as a is a available just like you'd have at any other restaurant. We'd have the same restrictions that the liquor commission puts on. Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman may we refer to legal counsel with regards to alcohol within a range of a school. Borup: We could but they all ready said they would abide with the law McKeegan: Yeah and I guess if we are within 1300 feet of a school (inaudible). We are right next to them — I'm guessing we may not be able to do it. Borup: The traffic count, about the only thing that would be less traffic then what your doing is maybe a bare weed patch or something. Norton: If you were to compare a high school football game and the number of seats in a stadium to your 1400 seat, are they comparable? Meridian Planning and Zc — g Commission Special Meeting ._ March 22, 2000 Page 41 McKeegan: It is my understanding, my kids play soccer instead of football because I have girls. All the large games are played at Boise State. I can't tell you. Norton: The point is being this doesn't seem like a lot of seats for a whole lot of traffic. McKeegan: It really isn't. We looked at that and adding additional seats, but the problem is when your digging a hole 16 feet deep, that is a very expensive hole and you don't want-- Again, this is an indoor venue. Everybody is going to be inside the building. I would guess that if you had practice football games or soccer games on the high school field, those would have more of a noise impact than our use on the inside. Borup: The seats for both arenas—is there any time when both arenas being operated. McKeegan: During a tournament you would. You'd have both sheets of ice. We have I think 350 for the small rink and 1000 for the larger. During the normal course of business we just don't see that many that large of an impact. Again, it is an interior indoor venue. It is not an external venue like you would have for a football or soccer game. I compare it more to a state championship basketball game. That is probably about the size you'd have with many a couple thousand spectators. Borup: Commissioner's. Norton: Mr. Chairman, I would like to continue the public hearing to April the 11th so that we are able to consider the Ada County Highway District report on the request for a conditional use permit for an ice arena consisting of office, pro shop, fitness center, restaurant, locker rooms, equipment storage and arena zoned LO by Pat McKeegan. Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman I second the motion. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: I'd like to thank everyone for being here this evening. One of the main purposes of this commission is gathering information and that's what we have tried to do this evening. I think you may appreciate sometimes the responsibility or maybe the dilemma we have. We've had people testifying all the way from wanting this area to ua all residential to all commercial. I guess that mean that maybe the majority wants somewhere in-between. I don't know. Obviously you can see, everybody's desire can't be met because even in this audience there was no agreement. We do the best we can by gathering this information and try to do what we feel is best for the City of Meridian. As is stated earlier, we are not wanting to continue ahead with out all the information and the information from ACHD is very important. That is why this hearing is being continued to get that information. We anticipate to do this next time is gather this Meridian Planning and Zc—* g Commission Special Meeting March 22, 2000 Page 42 information and then proceed to make our recommendation which again will go to City Council. Again, thank you for being here this evening. Norton: I move that we adjourn the meeting. Barbeiro: I second it. Borup: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: Meeting adjourned at 10:50 p.m. (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) APPROVED: KEITH BORUP, CHAIRMAN WILLIAM G. BERG, CITY CLERK MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING: March 22, 2000 APPLICANT: PAT MCKEEGAN (REP FOR LEE SMITH ICE ARENA) ITEM NUMBER: 6 REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE FOR "THE POND" ICE ARENA AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING & ZONING DEPT CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WASTEWATER DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: COMMENTS COMING SEE COMMENTS SEE COMMENTS ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: SANITARY SERVICE: OTHER: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS I� Ir^' All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. MAYOR HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY Robert D. Corrie A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT CITY OF MERIDIAN (708' 288-2499 •Fax 288 -2501 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PUBLIC LICC woRKs Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642�'08) 887-22-I1 • Fax 887-1297 ErFE Tammy deWeerd (208) 888 4433 •Fax (208) 887-4813 I- LANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218,Y DEPARTMENT ZOOO (208) 884-5533 ax 888-6854 t-lit.11 Of .Merjcjjas TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000 FILE NUMBER: CUP -00-015 REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE FOR "THE POND" ICE ARENA CONSISTING OF OFFICE, PRO SHOP, FITNESS CENTER, RESTAURANT, LOCKER ROOMS, EQUIPMENT ATORAGE AND ARENAS ZONED LO BY: PAT MCKEEGAN (REPRESENTATIVE FOR LEE SMITH ICE ARENA) LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED) SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR _RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C _TAMMY de WEERD, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE UILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER _CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: "9 4JI- 0 0 L L 1z4vq a; Z. . fc- 13.,E ix: `r CL March 2, 2000 Will Berg, City Clerk Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission 33 East Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 MAR - 6 2000 CI'T'Y nF 71711.11i 9P_°7.A T 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 Re: CUP -00-015 The Pond Ice Arena/Resolution Subdivision Dear Commissioners: Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District's Hunter Lateral courses along the west boundary of the proposed project. The District reserves the right to claim what we deem necessary to operate and maintain the Hunter Lateral. All storm drainage must be retained on site. Sincerely, Bill Henson, Asst. Water Superintendent NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT BH: dln Cc: File — Shop File — Office Water Superintendent Briggs Engineering, Inc. —Becky Bowcutt APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 CCCENTRAL CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT DISTRICT Environmental Health Division HEALTH DEPARTMENT tional Use Preliminary / Final / Short Plat -C)0—n/S —7—cc S'FL 2 D Return to: ❑ Boise ❑ Eagle ❑ Garden City tR"Meridian ❑ Kuna ❑ ACz ❑ I. We have No Objections to this Proposal.. ❑ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. MAR 6 2000 " ITY OF �T ❑ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ❑ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ❑ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ❑ high seasonal ground water ❑ waste flow characteristics ❑ or bedrock from original grade ❑ other ❑ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. ❑ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ❑ central sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water well ❑ interim sewage ❑ central water ❑ individual sewage ❑ individual water 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: ❑ central sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water ❑ sewage dry lines ❑ central water 10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ❑ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ❑ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. 13. Wewill quire plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ood establishment Elswimming pools or spas E] child care center beverage establishment ❑ grocery store 14.t c'c� �a ; r�x'ir� Si r �. �. T� � Date: .3 Reviewed By:� CDHD 10/91 rcb, rev. 7/97 Review Sheet cqff CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT MAIN OFFICE - 707 N. ARMSTRONG PL. - BOISE, ID 83704-0825 - (208) 375-521' - FAX 327-' _Ku To prevent and treat disease and disability; to promote healthy lifestyles; and to protect and promote the health and quality of our environnurnt. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that storm water be pre-treated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to ground water and surface water quality. The engineers and architects involved with the design of this project should obtain current best management practices for storm water disposal and design a storm water management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals that could be used for guidance are: State of Idaho Catalog of Stormwater Best Management Practices For Idaho Cities and Counties. Prepared by the Idaho Division of Environmental Quality, July 1997. Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook. Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department, January 1997. Ada / Boise County Office 707 N Armsrong PI. Boise, ID 83704 Enviro. Health: 327-7499 Family Planning: 327-7400 Immunizations: 327-7450 Senior Nutrition: 327-7460 WIC: 327-7488 FAX 327-8500 Serving Valley, Elmore, Boise, and Ada Counties Ada -WIC Satellite Office 1606 Robert St. Boise, ID 83705 Ph. 334-3355 FAX. 334-3355 Elmore County Office 520 E. 8th Street N. Mountain Home, ID 83647 Enviro. Health, 587-9225 Family Health: 587-4407 WIC: 587-4409 FAX: 587-3521 Valley County Office 703 N_ 1 st Street P O Box 1448 McCall, ID, 83138 Ph. 634-7194 FAX: 634-2174 02-28-00 13:18 MERIDIAN WA5TEWATER ID=2088840744 MAYOR HUB OF TREASURE VALL,F_Y Robcrt D, Corrie A Good Place to Live CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY OF MERIDIAN Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tammy deWeerd Cheric McCandless 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 - Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 P01/01 LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) -"SS -2499 • Fax 288.2501 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 - fax 888.6854 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13_2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE- March 22, 2000 FILE NUMBER: CUP -00-015 REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE FOR "THE POND" ICE ARENA CONSISTING OF OFFICE, PRO SHOP, FITNESS CENTER, RESTAURANT, LOCKER ROOMS, EQUIPMENT ATORAGE AND ARENAS ZONED LO BY: PAT MCKEEGAN (REPRESENTATIVE FOR LEE SMITH ICE ARENA) LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED)_ SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z ^KEITH BORUP, P/Z ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR IRON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C TAMMY de WEERD. C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE BUILDING DEPARTMENT _FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER FEB 2 9 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM & FINAL) FEB 2e '00 13:19 2oeee40744 PAGE.01 A MAYOR Robert D. Come CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tammy deWeerd Cherie McCandless .-. HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY r� A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 MEMORANDUM: March 20, 2000 To: Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council �,_ ' From: Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Technician MAR 2 0 2000 Brad Hawkins -Clark, Planner34lC Cita of Meridian Christy Richardson, Planner City Clerk Office Re: - Request for a Annexation and Zoning of 16.1 Acres from R -T to C -G by Overland, L.L.C. (File AZ -00-004) - Rezone of 37.6 Acres from R-4 to L -O by G.L. Voigt (File RZ-00-003) - Preliminary Plat of 107.06 Acres by G.L. Voigt (File PP -00-006) - Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Commercial Development (RESOLUTION PLAZA) consisting of Multi -Family, Commercial, Office and LDS Seminary in the proposed L -O and C -G Zones (File CUP -00-017) - Conditional Use Permit for a 200 Unit Luxury Apartment Complex by Desert West Properties, L.L.C. (File CUP -00-015) - Conditional Use Permit for a 86,160 Square Foot Ice Arena by Pat McKeegan (File CUP -00-016) We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATIONS SUMMARY There are six (6) separate applications covered in this report, each addressed separately after the summary. Five of the applications are associated with two parcels and propose a Planned Commercial Development (PD -C), generally located at the SE corner of Overland and South Locust Grove Roads. The sixth application (preliminary plat) also includes a 55 -acre parcel to the south of the PD -C owned by the Meridian School District and site of a future high school. The PD -C proposed uses include retail, office, an LDS Seminary, a 1,430 -seat ice hockey arena (two rinks), a daycare and a 200 -unit luxury apartment complex. The annexation application applies only to the 16 -acre parcel west of the Hunter Lateral. The rezone application applies only to the 37.64 -acre parcel south of Overland and east of the Hunter. Since ACHD has not yet submitted a report on the Preliminary Plat or three (3) CUP applications, Staff is recommending these four (4) applications be continued or tabled. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 Resolution Plan. AZ.RZ.PP. CUP. doc CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Mayor, Council and P&;'_�' March 20, 2000 Page 2 LOCATION The property is generally located at the SE corner of Overland Road and South Locust Grove Road with approximately % mile of frontage along Overland. The future high school parcel is currently land -locked and directly south of the 36 -acre parcel. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North — R.V. park, Cesco (John Deere), Transport, Truck & Trailers, future location of Treasure Valley Music, and two vacant parcels. All are zoned C -G (Meridian). South — An LDS church is currently being constructed on the Ada County parcel immediately south of the Overland, LLC parcel fronting on Locust Grove. Rim View Subdivision, zoned R1 in Ada County, is south of the church. Raven Hill and Los Alamitos Subdivision, zoned R4 (Meridian), lie south of the school parcel. East — Several large, vacant parcels currently in agricultural use are east of the subject parcels. All are zoned RT (Ada County). West — Several phases of Sportsman Pointe Subdivision, zoned R4, lies across Locust Grove Road to the west. There is also an unplatted, triangular shaped parcel at the SW corner of the intersection that is not in City limits, zoned RT (Ada Co.), with a single family residence. CURRENT OWNERS OF RECORD Gary L. Voigt is the property owner of the 37.6 acre parcel. Craig Groves and Greg Johnson (Overland LLC) are the owners of the 16.1 acre parcel. Meridian Joint School District No. 2 is the owner of the 55 acre parcel. All owners have submitted consent to be a part of these applications. GENERAL COMMENTS/OVERVIEW (All Applications) 1. The 1993 Meridian Comprehensive Plan was amended by Resolution #266 (File CPA -99- 005) for the Voigt and Overland LLC parcels from Single Family Residential to Mixed/Planned Use Development on 11-16-99 by action of the City Council. Under the amended Mixed Use designation, the proposed uses are permitted. 2. The applicant has proposed a tentative phasing plan consisting of four levels of priority: Phase I - Ice Hockey Facility (Construction anticipated in year 2000) Phase II - Apartment Complex Site `B" (Construction anticipated in year 2001) Phase III - Office/Retail Site "C" (Schedule dependent on tenant sales) Phase IV - Commercial/Office Site "A" (Applicant anticipates that this corner will not develop until the Locust Grove overpass is constructed.) NOTE: The Final Plat must be recorded prior to issuance of any building permits or Certificates of Zoning Compliance. 3. The Meridian School District will be a party to the preliminary plat at the City's request. The Meridian School District does not support nor oppose the Resolution Plaza project. It should be noted that the School District plans a High School on their 54.99 acre site. Development of the school site is contingent on a bond issue. The school district has indicated that a bond AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plzm.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&;'-' March 20, 2000 Page 3 issue for the high school will be submitted for a vote in the fall of 2000. If approved, construction of the school will take place in 2001. 4. On July 19, 1999, the APA (COMPASS) Board of Directors moved the proposed Locust Grove/I-84 overpass from the Destination 2020 Plan (soft projection) to the Transportation Improvement Plan (hard planning document). APA projects a dramatic increase in traffic for South Locust Grove when the overpass is constructed and they support a transportation management plan be developed for this project to coordinate the commuter needs of future residents and employees. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (All Applications) 1. Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for non- domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements. 4. Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 5. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 6. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section. 7. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 8. Provide five -foot -wide sidewalks in accordance.with City Ordinance. 9. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ,RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&;'� March 20, 2000 Page 4 ANNEXATION & ZONING REQUIREMENTS (File AZ -00-004) The legal description submitted in the application appears to meet the requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission. The parcel is contiguous to the existing corporate city limits of Meridian. 2. Staff agrees with the Applicant's forecast that the Overland/Locust Grove area will become a major intersection, especially with the construction of the I-84/Locust Grove overpass. Staff also agrees that neighborhood commercial services are needed in this area to service the existing residential subdivisions and proposed apartment complex residents. However, we do not support the proposed C -G zone. Staff recommends a lower -intensity commercial zone Neighborhood Commercial (C N). All of the proposed uses listed in item #10 of the application (retail,, day care, and office) are permitted either outright or with a CUP in both the C -N and C -G. But there are several uses permitted in the C -G that are prohibited in the C -N, including auto repair, service stations, hotels, truck stops, heavy equipment sales and auto sales lots. Given the previously stated concerns of the Sportsman Pointe and Los Alamitos residents and the increased number of children in the apartment complex, Staff feel the down -zoned C -N is a more appropriate zone and will adequately meet the development intentions of the Applicant. 3. The subject lots can be adequately served by public facilities, and the proposed uses will allow for orderly expansion of the city limits. 4. A Development Agreement will be required as a condition of annexation Annexation Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the annexation but denial of the requested C -G zone. We recommend C -N zoning. REZONE REQUIREMENTS (File RZ-00-003) 1. The legal description submitted in the application appears to meet the requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission. 2. Staff agrees with the proposed Limited Office (L -O) zone. It is the most appropriate zone for the proposed mixed uses within the Planned Development. The subject lot can be adequately served by public facilities, and the proposed uses will allow for orderly expansion of the city limits. 4. A Development Agreement will be required as a condition of rezone. Rezone Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the rezone with the requested L -O zone. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&" March 20, 2000 Page 5 PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL COMMENTS (File PP -00-006) 1. Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 2. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 3. Assessment fees for water and sewer service are determined during the building plan review process. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Re -Assessment Agreement with the City of Meridian for all commercial uses. An assessment agreement is a vehicle that protects the City of Meridian and the Developer in the event that estimated assessments are not in line with actual usages. The agreement provides for reimbursement to the developer for over payment of assessments and payment to the City of Meridian of any shortfall in assessments. The overpayment/shortfall is determined after adequate historical usage. PRLIMINARY PLAT REQUIREMENTS (File PP -00-006) Sanitary sewer service to this site will be via extensions from the Five Mile Trunk that is currently under construction by this applicant. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline. 2. Water service to this site will be via extensions from newly constructed mains under the interstate, and from extensions of existing mains installed in adjacent developments. Applicant will be responsible to construct the water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Please provide the Public works department with information on anticipated fire flow and domestic water requirements for the proposed site. Water service to this development is contingent upon positive results from a hydraulic analysis by our computer model. Flow and pressure from the existing mains should be monitored with the Meridian Water Department. 3. Two -hundred -fifty- and 100 -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 4. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on site. Please submit hook-up and design details based on the proposed landscaping. Due to the size of landscaped area, primary water supply connection to the City's mains will not be allowed. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&:�' March 20, 2000 Page 6 5. Applicant has not indicated whether the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and maintained by an association or the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. If the system is being proposed as a private system, plans and specifications for the irrigation system shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department as part of the development plan review process. A draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system O&M manual must be submitted prior to plan approval. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area. 6. Show all existing easements for irrigation/drainage facilities located within the boundaries of this proposed development (i.e. Hunter Lateral easements). 7. Detailed landscape plans for the Overland Road and Locust Grove Road landscape frontage buffers and for street landscaping along Millenium Way and Celebration Avenue shall be submitted for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat application. This requirement does not include interior lot landscaping. Interior landscaping will be dealt with on a site by site review basis with future CUP applications. A letter of credit or cash surety will be required for the improvements prior to signature on the Final Plat. 8. Staff recommends the Overland and Locust Road landscape buffers be platted as separate common lots within the subdivision and maintenance be the responsibility of the Development Committee/Association. The draft CC&Rs submitted with the application states each separate lot owner in the subdivision will be responsible for construction, installation and maintenance of landscaping on each building site. By placing responsibility for the arterial landscape buffers with a single entity (the Association), greater consistency of design and maintenance may be achieved. At a minimum, the landscape buffers shall be placed within a permanent landscape easement designated as such on the plat. No easements are currently shown. 9. Six -foot -high, permanent perimeter fencing shall be required along the eastern boundary of Lot 1, Block 3, and Lot 2, Block 1, and along the southern boundary of Lot 15 & 16, Block 1. Submit detailed fencing plans for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat. All required fencing is to be in place prior to issuance of building permits. 10. The Applicant is proposing to construct a fence along the east boundary of the Hunter Lateral. Staff recommends the Lateral be piped and no fence constructed. Given the close proximity of the proposed 200 unit apartment complex, High School, and Daycare, staff recommends the applicant be required to comply with Ord. 12-4-13 (Piping of AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc .r. Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 7 Ditches). The City required the developers of Raven Hill and Los Alamitos subdivisions (upstream from subject site) to tile the Hunter and see no reason this site should receive an exemption from the piping ordinance. 11. Applicant shall provide a vehicular access across the Hunter Lateral from the proposed apartment complex (Site "B") to the proposed Office/Retail area (Site "A"). The purpose of this connection is to minimize the vehicular impact on Overland Road and to provide an internal connection to the Daycare and Retail sites. The Transportation Impact Study submitted by Dobie Engineering, Inc. assumed 20% of the office and day care traffic would be captured within the complex. However, this capturing cannot take place unless an internal access road is provided. If a connection is not provided across the Hunter, an additional 20% of vehicle trips would be added to Overland Road (based on Dobie's estimations). 12. Applicant has provided the minimum required 35 feet of landscape buffer along Overland Road, an entryway corridor. Staff agrees. They show 25 feet of landscape buffer along Locust Grove Road (including the 5 foot wide detached sidewalk). Since Locust Grove is not listed as an entryway corridor, Staff supports the 25 -foot buffer width for this arterial. At a minimum, the Overland Road landscape buffer must be completed from the eastern property boundary to 30 feet west of Millenium Way prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy for any building within the subdivision. 13. Applicant is proposing a 30 -foot wide private road (Y2K Lane) to serve Lot 6 and 8, Block 1. Applicant should explain the purpose for the private classification and whether or not sidewalks will be provided. All private roads must approved by the City Council. Staff questions the intent of the private classification, particularly when this will be the first drive providing access into the site for eastbound traffic on Overland and will likely be heavily used. If approved, Staff recommends 5 -foot sidewalks be provided on at least one (1) side of the road. Preliminary Plat Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions: a) additional fencing is provided, b) the Hunter Lateral is tiled, c) provide a single vehicular connection across the Hunter Lateral, and d) landscaping is provided and constructed per item #12. Until the City receives a copy of the ACHD report, the public hearing should be continued. CUP (PUD/COMMERCIAL) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-017) As part of a conditional use permit, the City of Meridian may impose restrictions and conditions in addition to current City Ordinances. 2. This Conditional Use Permit is for the overall concept only. Future phases of the project will require separate Conditional Use Permits for each phase and each must substantially comply with the final approved Concept Plan. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 8 3. Conceptually (based upon the submitted Overall Preliminary Site Plan dated 2-01-00), staff believes the project is in accord with the purpose of Planned Developments as outlined in the Subdivision & Development Ordinance. The mixed residential, office, recreation and retail uses meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and should contribute to a reduction in traffic in this area. 4. Planned Development Regulations: As a mixed/planned use development, the Resolution Plaza development must comply with the following sections of the subdivision ordinance: 12-6-4 Procedures for Planned Developments, 12-6-6 General Regulations for Planned Development, and 12-6-7 General Standards for Planned Developments. In addition, residential areas must comply with 12-6-8-A Design Standards for Planned Development -Residential. All commercial and office uses must comply with 12-6-8-B Design Standards for Planned Development -Commercial. 5. Colored Rendering: Colored renderings of the development must be submitted prior to the City Council meeting to meet the intent of Section 12-6-4 of the PD ordinance. 6. Open Space: All Planned Developments (PD) are required to have at least 10% of the gross land area of the PD as common open space as 12-6-7-E-5. The total common open space calculation for Resolution Plaza is shown separately on Sheets 1-3 (Sites "A" — "C"). Site "A" is 4.53 acres (1.44 required), Site `B" is 5.29 acres (1.45 required), and Site "C" is 4.10 acres (1.86 required). These calculations include landscape buffers and islands. Standard practice has been that residential PD's cannot count required buffers and landscape setbacks toward the 10% open space requirement, but commercial PD's have been allowed to count it. Total gross site acreage for the Resolution Plaza project is 47.04 acres (excluding public rights-of-way). 10% open space would be 4.7 acres. The minimum amount of open space has been met. All open space delineated as common open space must meet all standards of 12-6-7-E. 7. Parking: The matrix below summarizes the total off-street parking counts for the conceptual PD -C: Site / Use Parking Proposed Parking Required Site "A" - Retail pads N of first driveway (3) 257 250 - Retail & office pads b/w driveways (2) 183 181 - Office & day care pads S of second driveway 189 100 (est.) Site "A" Total 629 531 Site `B" (Apartment complex) 553* 460 (2.3/d.u.) Site "C" - Retail & office pads on Y2K Lane 2) 156 151 AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP,CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 9 - LDS Seminar 17 20 (est.) - Office buildin s S of Gala St. (2) 129 98 - Retail & office buildings N of Gala St. (2) 317 287 -Ice Arena 278 286 (115 seats) *The Applicant is proposing 152 tandem parking spaces for the complex. The P&Z Commission discouraged tandem parking for a proposed apartment complex of similar size in October 1999 (Valerie Heights). If the tandem parking is subtracted from the total parking spaces, their total provided would be 401 spaces. On the Site "A" plan, a row of parking is proposed along the south edge of the north driveway and along both the north and south edges of the south driveway with no separation. Given the likelihood of these private driveways receiving high volumes of traffic at build -out (functioning more as public roads), Staff feels this design would be unsafe and should be relocated. The first parking stalls are less than 40 feet from the property line and vehicles backing out of the stalls into the drive aisle will likely be a hazard for vehicles entering the site off Locust Grove. The proposed Ice Arena seats a total of 1,430 people. Technically, the Applicant meets City ordinance, which is based on one stall for every 5 seats. If one assumes the arena will utilize the parking north of Gala Street for evening events, an additional 317 stalls could feasibly be added to serve the arena, providing a total of 595 stalls. The Applicant should provide more detail on the hours of operation for the ice arena and their experience with other similar venues and whether or not both rinks will be used simultaneously. 8. Parking Lot Landscaping: Landscape islands serving a single row of parking shall have one tree. Islands serving a double row of parking shall have two trees. A minimum of one 3" caliper tree per 1500 square feet of asphalt (including driveways connecting from the loop road) is required per City Ordinance. 9. Streets and Circulation: Staff agrees with the proposed stub road (Gala Street) to the east, unplatted property. As stated in the Preliminary Plat comments, we recommend access be provided internally with a connection between Sites "A" and `B". There is a conflict between the Concept Plan and Plat for the Seminary site. The plat proposes a flag lot for Lot 4, Block 1 (the proposed 19,648 s.f. office building), with the flag serving as the driveway. However, the Concept Plan shows the seminary utilizing the flag driveway, not the office. Staff does not disagree with the design, but it should be noted for future cross access agreements. 10. Signage: The Applicant submitted a letter from Idaho Electric Signs regarding signage for the apartment complex and a letter from Patrick McKeegan outlining intent for the ice arena signage. The monument signs shall not exceed 70 s.f. All signage throughout the PD -C shall be coordinated and complement building materials and themes. This applies to all future buildings. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Pl=.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 10 11. Storage Areas: Per Ordinance 12-6-8.A.1, Storage areas shall be provided for the anticipated needs of boats, campers, motorhomes, and trailers. No such areas are designated on the Site Plan. Applicant shall either provide a storage area adequate to serve every two (2) living units or provide evidence that storage needs can be met through an alternative method. 12. Maintenance Building: A maintenance building or approved area shall be provided that is suitable for the services required for the repair and maintenance of all common areas as per Section 9-607.H.3. 13. Trash Enclosures: No trash enclosures are shown on the Conceptual Site Plan. Staff recommends all such areas be situated outside of view from either Overland or Locust Grove Roads. Applicant shall coordinate locations and construction requirements of the required trash enclosures with Meridian Sanitary Service, Inc., and provide a letter of approval from their office when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. 14. Hours of Operation: No details of hours of operation are provided. For the future CUP applications, all office and retail uses should be harmonious with the apartment complex and residential homes to the west. 15. Alternative Transportation Options: At build -out, this site will serve as a principal center of employment for the east Meridian/west Boise area. While Boise Urban Stages does not currently service Overland Road, it has the potential to be a likely destination point for mass transit in the future. Staff strongly recommends an area be designated and/or preserved on the Concept Plan for a future bus stop. We also recommend the inclusion of bicycle racks at all office and retail buildings and the ice hockey arena. 16. All conditions placed on this application shall run with the land and shall not lapse or be waived as the result of any change in tenancy or ownership of any or all of the lands governed by this CUP application. All such conditions shall be deemed the requirements for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any use or structure as per City Ordinance. 17. Applicant shall utilize the Ada County Highway District design standards for the private street within this development, with the exception of width requirements. Street designs shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Meridian Public Works Department. PD -C Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the concept plan with the above conditions. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ,RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 11 CUP (APARTMENT COMPLEX) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-017) All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site `B" (apartment complex) shall be incorporated here. 2. The Applicant is proposing to construct the complex in two (2) phases, with the first phase consisting of approximately 140 units and the clubhouse. Staff recommends the number of units constructed in phase 1 be limited to a maximum of thirty (30) dwelling units and that no more units be granted occupancy until Overland Road capacity is improved. Overland Road between Locust Grove and Eagle Road is currently a two-lane, non - signalized arterial. Numerous traffic concerns have been entered into the public record regarding the capacity of both Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. Traffic was cited as one of the principal reasons for the City's denial of the proposed Sundance Apartments at the NW corner of Locust Grove Road and Overland Road last Fall. Dobie Engineering's traffic study lists Overland Road (east of Locust Grove Road) as having 11,230 vehicles/day in 7/98. Over the past twenty (20) months, this figure has certainly increased; especially factoring in the new homes built in Sherbrooke Hollows to the south. Dobie's study estimates 1,170 new trips/day to be generated by the apartment complex and 335 new trips/day generated by the ice arena. The study also projects a Level of Service "F" for the left -turn outs from all three Overland Road driveways until signals are installed. The study further assumes the high school, potentially slated for construction in 2001 (which is the same year as the apartment complex), will generate 3,000 trips/day and 250 peak hour trips. Overland Road is designated in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as a 5 -lane arterial with bike lanes to be constructed in 2005. Staff believes that limiting new development on the subject site, to the Ice Arena and thirty (30) apartments would facilitate a smoother transition for the neighborhoods and ease the impact on Overland Road until such time as it is widened and signalized. 3. All applicable Fair Housing and ADA requirements for multi -family housing must be met, including accessibility design for the ground floor units. Handicap parking shall be provided to serve the Clubhouse. CUP (Apartments) Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the condition that only the clubhouse and thirty (30) dwelling units receive occupancy until Overland Road is improved. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. CUP ("THE POND" ICE ARENA) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-015) 1. All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site "C" (ice arena) shall be incorporated here. 2. A minimum of seven (7) handicap accessible spaces must be provided to directly serve this AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 12 facility. Only two (2) are shown. Revise site plan accordingly. CUP (Ice Arena) Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS The 1993 Comprehensive Plan contains a variety of goals and policies relevant to this application. The following sections most directly apply to the proposed project and are repeated here for the Council and Commission's consideration during the hearing process. Goal 3 is "to encourage the kind of economic growth and development which supplies employment and economic self-sufficiency for existing and future residents, reduces the present reliance on Boise and strengthens the City's ability to finance and implement public improvements, services, and its open space character." Goal 4 is "to provide housing opportunities for all economic groups within the community." Goal 8 is "to establish compatible and efficient use of land through the use of innovative and functional site design." Economic Development 1.1 The City of Meridian' shall make every effort to create a positive atmosphere that encourages... commercial enterprises to locate in Meridian. 1.3 The character, site improvements and type of new commercial or industrial developments should be harmonized with the natural environment and respect the unique needs and features of each area. Land Use 1 AU Encourage new development that reinforces the City's present development pattern of higher density development within the Old Town area and lower density development in outlying areas. 1.8U Promote the development of high-quality and environmentally compatible residential areas that contain the necessary parks, schools and commercial facilities to maintain and form identifiable neighborhoods. 2.1 U Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi -family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities. 2.2U Support strategies for the development of neighborhood parks within all residential areas. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ.PP.CUP.doe Mayor, Council and P&2 March 20, 2000 Page 13 2.3U Protect and maintain residential neighborhood property values, improve each neighborhood's physical condition and enhance its quality of life for residents. 4.8U Encourage commercial uses, offices and medical -care uses to locate in the Old Town district, business parks, shopping centers and near high-intensity activity areas, such as freeway interchanges. 6.8U New urban density subdivisions which abut or are proximal to existing rural residential land uses shall provide screening and transitional densities with larger, more comparable lot sizes to buffer the interface between the urban level densities and rural residential densities. Transportation 1.4U Monitor and coordinate the compatibility of the land use and transportation system. 1.20U Encourage proper design of residential neighborhoods to ensure their safety and tranquility. Open Space, Parks and Recreation 2.5U New subdivision development... will be considered as opportunities to ... encourage the development of recreational open spaces and parks as part of new planned developments. Housing 1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide diversity of housing types ... in a variety of locations suitable for residential development. 1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping centers shall be encouraged. 1.6 Housing proposals shall be phased with transportation, open space and public service and facility plans, which will maximize benefits to the residents, minimize conflicts and provide a tie-in between new residential areas and service needs. 1.19 High-density development, where possible, should be located near open space corridors or other permanent major open space and park facilities, and near major access thoroughfares. Community Design 5.2 Ensure that all new development enhances rather than detracts from the visual quality of its surroundings, especially in areas of prominent visibility. 6.5U Establish land -use designations that reflect the character of existing neighborhoods. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ.PP.CUP. doc Mayor, Council and P&Z~ March 20, 2000 Page 14 6.11 U Promote well-planned and well -designated affordable housing in all Meridian neighborhoods. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc BR/GGS EVIG/NEER/N -1 Inc. ENGINEERS/ P I ANNERS / SURVEYORS March 22, 2000 Mr. Brad Hawkins -Clark Mr. Bruce Freckleton City of Meridian 200 L. Carlton, Suite 201 Meridian, Idaho 83642 ,-11 1800 West Overland Road Boise, Idaho 83705 — 3142 Voice (208) 344-9700 Fax (208) 345-2950 E-mail briggs@micron.net P T7,'C T MAR 2 2 2000 CITY OFilEIRLINj Re: Resolution Plaza. (Annexation, Rezone, Preliminary Plat, PUD & Conditional Use Applications) Dear Brad and Bruce: This letter is in response to staff comments dated March 20, 2000 General Comments : 1. We are in agreement. 2. The phasing information is correct. 3. The School District information is correct. 4. We would like more detailed information on transportation management plans. General Requirements 1. Internal irrigation and drainage ditches will be piped. The Hunter Lateral adjoining the west boundary of the Voigt property will be piped. The section of the adjoining Hunter Lateral which abuts the Meridian School District property will be the responsibility of the District if piping is required for Lot 1, Block 1. 2. A septic system and two wells presently exist on the property. The septic system and residential well will be removed per City Ordinance. The second well was used For agricultural purposes. We are exploring the possible use of the well as a secondary pressure irrigation source. 3. The applicant will comply. 4. The applicant will comply. 5. The applicant will provide a drainage plan. A drainage ditch traverses the subject property. The ditch receives nm -off from the property. We may explore approval to discharge the pre - development (low. 6. The applicant wi I I comply. 7. The applicant will comply. 8. The applicant will comply. 9. The applicant will comply. 0 10 1 \CityMer Hawkins -Clark Respoase.ltr MAR 22 '00 12:24 12083452950 PAGE.02 Annexation and Zoning Requirements: (File A7,-00-004) 1. Acceptable. 2. Staffs recommendation for Neighborhood Commercial (CN) zoning is acceptable since the anticipated uses would be allowed within the CN designation. 3. We are in agreement. 4. The applicant will comply and enter into a development agreement. Rezone Requirements :(File R2-00-003) 1. We are in agreement. 2. We are in agreement. 3. We are in agreement. 4. The applicant will comply and enter into a development agreement. Preliminary Plat General Comments. (File PP -00-006) 1. The subdivision name Resolution Subdivision has been approved by the Ada County Engineer. The Street Name Committee has reviewed the proposed street name and has issued an evaluation and approval. 2. The applicant will comply. 3. The applicant will comply. Preliminary Plat Requirements: (File PP -00-006) 1. The applicant will comply. ?. The applicant will comply. 3. The applicant will comply. 4. The applicant will provide pressure irrigation to all lots with the exception of Lot 1, Block 1 (Meridian School District lot). We have contacted the School District concerning participation in a joint pump station. However, if the District believes financial participation is premature, since their irrigation needs are unknown at this time. We will proceed with an independent station. 5. The applicant intends to design and construct the pressure irrigation facilities to Nampa Meridian Irrigation District Standards. The system will be owned and maintained by Nampa Meridian Irrigation District with approval by the District Board. An agricultural well exists on the G. L. Voigt parcel. The well was historically used for a dairy. We intend to utilize the well as a secondary source if approval from Idaho Department of Water Resources can be obtained. 6. The applicant will delineate the NMID casement for the Hunter Lateral on the plat. No other irrigation easements exist on the subject properties. 7. The applicant will comply. S. The applicant intends to provide landscape easements along Locust Grove and Overland Roads. An :association will be formed to govern perimeter landscaping. 9. The applicant will comply. 0101\CityMer Hawkins -Clark Response.1tr MAR 22 '00 12:25 12083452950 PAGE.03 10. The developer of the apartment complex believes a fence along their western boundary is necessary as a buffer and for security purposes. Interconnection can be accomplished with pedestrian pathways and (1) vehicular connection as requested in Condition No. 11. The applicant will pipe the Hunter Lateral as requested by staff. 11. A vehicular connection between Site A & B could be accomplished from the driveway between building 7 & 8. if the daycare building size were reduced and the driveway angles north to intersect.just above the traffic circle. 12. The applicant will comply. 13. The private road functions as a joint private access between Lot 8 & 6, Block 1 and Millennium Way. This access could be accomplished with an easement or cross access agreement for a driveway. The applicant did not intend the driveway to be constructed with curbs, gutter and sidewalk. CUP (PUD/Commercial) Requirements• (File CUP -00-017) 1. The applicant understands. 2. The applicant understands the approval is conceptual and future uses will require site specific conditional use approval. The staff and commission must understand the term conceptual. Final development plans will most likely reflect minor deviations from the concept. 3. The applicant is in agreement. 4. The applicant will comply with the requirements of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance as follows: Sections 12-6-4, 12-6-6, 12-6-7 & 12-6-8-B. The applicant disagrees with the requirements of Section 12-6-8-A (1, 2 & 3). (1) The multi -family project applicant indicates the parking of any type of recreational vehicle will be prohibited. Any resident with RV's will need to store the vehicles at a public storage facility offsite. Therefore, there is no necessity to provide a storage area. (2) The applicant opposes the recommendation to provide one additional parking space for every three dwelling units in addition to the required 2 spaces per dweling unit. This section is not a mandate since it refers to the word "may" not shall or should. The applicant for the apartment complex has provided two (2) parking spaces per dwelling unit as specified in Section 11-13-15-B of the Meridian Ordinance. The standard of two spaces per unit is universal in most jurisdictions. The applicant has also provided attached garages which enhances the aesthetics of the project with less hard surface areas. Driveways (tandem parking) to the garages provides additional parking for guests. (3) No maintenance building is proposed with the multi -family or commercial project. The applicants intend to contract with a landscape company for maintenance of common areas and landscaping. Therefore, this requirement should 0101\CiryMer Hawkins -Clark Response.ltr MAR 22 '00 12:25 12083452950 PAGE.04 be deleted. 5. A colored site/landscape plan and multiple colored elevations of proposed structures was submitted with the applications. The applicants will need specifics concerning additional information required under Section 12-6-4. It is the applicant's belief that Section 12-6-4 has been satisfied. 6. The applicant is in agreement. 7. The applicant disagrees with the parking requirement of Site B (Apartment Complex). Staff indicates a requirement of 2.3 spaces/dwelling unit. The Ordinance mandates (2) spaces/du. Staff has never required parking in excess of 2/unit on any previous applications processed by Briggs Engineering. I believe this recommendation is excessive and adds to paved areas at the expense of landscaping/common areas. The Ordinance does not mandate anything beyond (2) spaces/unit. The parking required condition should be revised to reflect "400". The Apartment Complex was designed with 401 parking spaces (garages and open parking) to meet the Ordinance requirement of 2 spaces/unit. The tandem parking (driveways in front of attached garages) was considered excess, yet was referenced on the site plan. Mr. McKeegan, the architect for the Ice Arena believes the parking provided (278 spaces) will be under utilized most of the time. (Sec Mr. McKeegan's letter attached.) Customers of the rink will have the ability to park in adjoining lots during heavy peak hours for the rink We believe a minor amount of over—flow parking is reasonable. Please refer to the letter from Patrick McKeegan dated March 21, 2000 for additional information on the Ice Arena's parking needs and hours of operation. The applicant will revise the site plan and remove the three rows of parking stalls which back directly into the access driveways on Site A. S. The applicant will comply with landscaping requirements for parking lots. 9. The applicant is in agreement and will delineate the necessary cross access easements on the final plat for lots which may share private access driveways. 10. The applicant will comply. 11. The applicant for the Apartment Complex will prohibit the parking of recreational vehicles within the complex. 12. The maintenance of common areas will be contracted with a lawn care company. Therefore, there is no practical need for a maintenance building for any of the proposed developments. 13. A site plan was sent to Meridian Sanitary Services for their review and comment. A meeting has been scheduled with Bill Gregory. Meridian Sanitary Services on March 22, 2000 to obtain recommendations for trash enclosure locations. The applicant will comply. 14. See letter from Patrick McKeegan concerning hours of operation for the Ice Arena. We agree that hours of operation are important in order to coexist with existing residential development and the proposed multi -family development. 15. An easement For a possible future bus stop could be provided on the plat. 0101\CityMer Hawkins -Clark Responsc.ltr MAR 22 100 12:26 12083452950 PAGE.05 117C. 1800 W. Overland Road —Eloise Idaho 83 — Lutl 344-y The inclusion ol-bicycle racks within the development is acceptable. 16. The applicant is in agreement. 17. The applicant proposes the Y2K Lane as a private driveway. The applicant does not intend to construct this as a public street with curb, gutter and sidewalk. CUP (Apartment Complex) Requirements: (File CUP -00-017) I. The applicant agrees, with the exception of those conditions which we have documented our opposition. 2. The applicant disagrees with the limitation of the apartment complex to 30 units. it is not economically feasible to construct the necessary infrastructure (i.e. clubhouse, pool, sewer, water, roadways & parking) to accommodate 30 units. (See letter from Desert West, LLC.) It is our desire to encourage AC11D to consider a private/public effort to improve Overland Road. 3. The applicant will comply with ADA requirements. CUP ("The Pond" Ice Arena) Reg uiremcnts: (File CUP -00-015) 1. The applicant agrees with the exception of those conditions which we have documented opposition. 2. The applicant will comply. (See Patrick McKeegan's letter dated March 21, 2000.) Sincerely, BRIG S ENGINES G, T i3ecly L. Bowcutt Land Use Planner BLB:fc 0101\CiryMer Hawkins -Clark Response.ltr MAR 22 '00 12:26 12083452950 PAGE.06 - P1 j ick W Keegan Architects 419 S. em Street, Suite B Boise, Idaho 83702-7157 208.424.8608 Fax 208.424.8609 www_ mCkeeganarch.com March 21, 2000 Becky Bowcutt Bnggs Engineering 1800 W. Overland road Boise, 10 83705 Re- Pond Ice Arena CUP Report Response Project No. 99052 Dear Becky. I have reviewed Meridian's comments and am pleased with the positive response. My response to their comments on the Ice Facility follows. For clarity I have indicated the City's page and paragraph number. Page 3, Item 4: Transportation Management Plan. We support the concept and would participate in a development wide plan. Page 3, Item 5: Drainage. Will there be a development wide drainage plan or will we be required to maintain all drainage on our parcel? Our civil engineer has indicated that we can accommodate our drainage runoff on our parcel. Page 4, Item 2: C -N zoning. I assume that since staff has not stated tate Ice Rink use is not allowed in the C -N zoning that it is. We have no problem with the designation for our use. Page 5, Item 4 and Page 8 Item 5: Pressurized irrigation system. Will this be a development wide system or will each parcel be responsible for its needs? Page 5, Item 9: Perimeter fencing. Will the fencing be installed by the development or are we responsible for the portion abutting our proposed lot? Page 7 Item 2. Conceptual approval only. It was Mr. Smith's understanding that our application was for CU approval of our project also. When is the earliest we could apply for our CU? Page 8, Item 5. Colored rendering. I thought we furnished one with our previous package to you. I have enclosed another for this submission. MAP-.1--nnn 15:45 20e 424 8509 p.01 MAR 22 '00 12:27 12083452950 PAGE.07 Page 9, Item 7; Additional detail on operations. Mr. Smith has conducted focus groups to determine the feasibility for this facility and what the communities needs are for ice related recreation. He is also actively involved in the local recreational hockey leagues. Much of the information is proprietary business information but I can summarized our plans as follows*, There is a need in the area for additional ice facilities. Ice World is currently running at full capacity and cannot support the current need or anticipated growth in hockey. Many of the adult partidpants work non-traditional hours because of the nature of the major employers (Micron, HP, etc,) running multiple shifts. There is a need for a facility that will provide around the clock Ice facilitles_ Our facility will be open 24 hours but except for a few peak periods during the day will not require anywhere near the parking that is being requested. For example if both sheets were being used by four teams there would be approximately 64 persons on the ice. During open recreational skating there might be as many as 100 persons on one or both sheets. Open recreational skating will be scheduled after school and during the early evenings when the sheets are not scheduled for practice. The majority of the time the ice will be scheduled by teams (16 players plus coaches) for practice on a rotating basis. We anticipate once a month having toumaments or other events that would require the full parking count. These would usually occur during the weekend or evenings when the office Parking would not be used. We believe the parking we have provided will be underutilized most of the time and that the shared use for the additional 8 seats is reasonable. We had hoped the City would allow more shared parking so the total development parking bots would not need to be so barge. Page 10, Item 15: Bicycle racks. They will be provided at our facility. Page 11, Item 2: HC parking spaces. 5 additional HC parking spaces will be designated. If you have any questions, or need more information, please call. Sincerely. Patrick McKeegan Architects /Patrick Zgan Principal Architect MAR -21-2000 15=46 208 424 8609 P_R2 MAR 22 '00 12:27 12083452950 PAGE.08 Desert 'gest Properties, LLC 3/21/00 Planning & Zoning Commission / Mayor & City Council City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Cotmncnts on the submittal review comments for the 200 unit Luxury Apartment Complex by Desert West Properties, LLC Dear, Commission and council With regard to conditions proposed m the March 20`' 2000 review of our application for a Conditional Use Permit (File CUP -00-015) We would like to address the items that pertain to the 200 Uait Luxury Apartment complex. Preliminary Plat Requirements (File PP -00-006) Item 10: It is the preference of the applicant to pipe the hunter lateral as well as construct the 6' fecce. It is our opinion that the perimeter fence is necessary to maintain the level of security and cleanliness that our clientele will expect from a facility of this caliber. We ask the City council to allow us to provide this important amenity. Thank you. Itrm 11: The applicant would be agreeable to this condition provided that we are able to limit the traffic into the complex to residents only, thereby protecting the project from drive threw traffic that would be detrimental to the peace and tranquility of our secured environment. CUP (PUD/Commercial) Requirements (File CUP -00-017) Item 7: The applicant believes that there has been an error in the calculation of the required parking. When the tandem parking spaces are deducted from the total of the proposed parking, 401 spaces remain. It is our understanding that there are 2 stalls required for each of the 200 units equaling 400 stalls. Item 8: It is our intent to comply with this request fully. Item 11: It is the intent of the applicant to restrict parking to automobiles and light duty trucks able to fit into one stall. Storage of boats, campers, motorhomes, trailers and vehicles that are inoperable or not used regularly will not be allowed and the owner will be required to secure suitable storage elsewhere. NOP -22-2000 ee : 'S 2088�8g52^ �.._„ P-02 MAR 22 '00 12:26 12083452950 PAGE.09 Item 12: The applicant will be subcorrtracting maintenance and grounds keeping to a qualified professional. Item 13: the applicant intends to conform to this request in full. CUP (Apartment Complex) requirements (File CUP -o0 -o17) Item 2: The applicant has concluded that it is not economically feasible to limit the number of units that can be built in phase 1, and requests that the council delete such a requirement, as it would interfere with the ability of the business to be profitable. We are aware of the traffic problem on Overland road, however, it is our belief that by developing this site fully and paying the ACHD impact fees we will be closer to funding the expansion than if development is drawn out and funding is not as available. In addition, the ],170 trips per day estimated by Dobie Engineering is somewhat insignificant when compared to the traff c generated by the High school and other commercial enterprises. We appreciate responsibility that you bear and thank you for the service you render in behalf of this community. Sincerely, The Principles of Desen West Property LLC MAR -22-2000 08:35 Dcscrt Warr ProPotes, LLC, PC pox 1030 Mtndiao. Idaho 63642 (208)696-0800 Fan. (208) 898.9527 -a88a85527 r. -,z MAR 22 '00 12:28 TOTAL P.10 12083452950 PAGE.10 ----------- I . Ci1 F_NGINEERING 6RIGGS I ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL TO - +) I COMPANY FAX NO. DATE 3 - Z Z - cb NO. OF PAGES SENT (Including Transmittal) REFERENCE REMARKS REPLY REQUESTED COPY FROM r✓�0�� BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD BOISE, IDAHO 83705 FAX (208) 345-2950 * TEL (208) 344-9700 (BEI) PROJECT NO. - 4210 I 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD * BOISE, IDAHO 83705 * (208)344-9700 "► .'z FAX (208)345-29`. MAR 22 '00 12:24 12083452950 PAGE.01 MAYOR Robert D. Corrie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tammy deWeerd Cherie McCandless MEMORANDUM: HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY ^ A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 To: Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council From: Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Technician Brad Hawkins -Clark, Planner3r- Christy Richardson, Planner LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208)288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 March 20, 2000 REC11-VEID LIAR 2 0 2000 City of ';Nleridiala. City Clerk Office Re: - Request for a Annexation and Zoning of 16.1 Acres from R -T to C -G by Overland, L.L.C. (File AZ -00-004) Rezone of 37.6 Acres from R-4 to L -O by G.L. Voigt (File RZ-00-003) Preliminary Plat of 107.06 Acres by G.L. Voigt (File PP -00-0016) Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Commercial Development (RESOLUTION PLAZA) consisting of Multi -Family, Commercial, Office and LDS Seminary in the proposed L -O and C -G Zones (File CUP -00-017) - Conditional Use Permit for a 200 Unit Luxury Apartment Complex by Desert West Properties, L.L.C. (File CUP -00-015) - Conditional Use Permit for a 86,160 Square Foot Ice Arena by Pat McKeegan (File CUP -00-016) We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATIONS SUMMARY There are six (6) separate applications covered in this report, each addressed separately after the summary. Five of the applications are associated with two parcels and propose a Planned Commercial Development (PD -C), generally located at the SE corner of Overland and South Locust Grove Roads. The sixth application (preliminary plat) also includes a 55 -acre parcel to the south of the PD -C owned by the Meridian School District and site of a future high school. The PD -C proposed uses include retail, office, an LDS Seminary, a 1,430 -seat ice hockey arena (two rinks), a daycare and a 200 -unit luxury apartment complex. The annexation application applies only to the 16 -acre parcel west of the Hunter Lateral. The rezone application applies only to the 37.64 -acre parcel south of Overland and east of the Hunter. Since ACHD has not yet submitted a report on the Preliminary Plat or three (3) CUP applications, Staff is recommending these four (4) applications be continued or tabled. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ,PP.CUP.doc CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Mayor, Council and P&"-' March 20, 2000 Page 2 LOCATION The property is generally located at the SE corner of Overland Road and South Locust Grove Road with approximately '/z mile of frontage along Overland. The future high school parcel is currently land -locked and directly south of the 36 -acre parcel. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North — R.V. park, Cesco (John Deere), Transport, Truck & Trailers, future location of Treasure Valley Music, and two vacant parcels. All are zoned C -G (Meridian). South — An LDS church is currently being constructed on the Ada County parcel immediately south of the Overland, LLC parcel fronting on Locust Grove. Rim View Subdivision, zoned R1 in Ada County, is south of the church. Raven Hill and Los Alamitos Subdivision, zoned R4 (Meridian), lie south of the school parcel. East — Several large, vacant parcels currently in agricultural use are east of the subject parcels. All are zoned RT (Ada County). West — Several phases of Sportsman Pointe Subdivision, zoned R4, lies across Locust Grove Road to the west. There is also an unplatted, triangular shaped parcel at the SW corner of the intersection that is not in City limits, zoned RT (Ada Co.), with a single family residence. CURRENT OWNERS OF RECORD Gary L. Voigt is the property owner of the 37.6 acre parcel. Craig Groves and Greg Johnson (Overland LLC) are the owners of the 16.1 acre parcel. Meridian Joint School District No. 2 is the owner of the 55 acre parcel. All owners have submitted consent to be a part of these applications. GENERAL COMMENTS/OVERVIEW (All Applications) 1. The 1993 Meridian Comprehensive Plan was amended by Resolution #266 (File CPA -99- 005) for the Voigt and Overland LLC parcels from Single Family Residential to Mixed/Planned Use Development on 11-16-99 by action of the City Council. Under the amended Mixed Use designation, the proposed uses are permitted. 2. The applicant has proposed a tentative phasing plan consisting of four levels of priority: Phase I - Ice Hockey Facility (Construction anticipated in year 2000) Phase II - Apartment Complex Site `B" (Construction anticipated in year 2001) Phase III - Office/Retail Site "C" (Schedule dependent on tenant sales) Phase IV - Commercial/Office Site "A" (Applicant anticipates that this corner will not develop until the Locust Grove overpass is constructed.) NOTE: The Final Plat must be recorded prior to issuance of any building permits or Certificates of Zoning Compliance. 3. The Meridian School District will be a party to the preliminary plat at the City's request. The Meridian School District does not support nor oppose the Resolution Plaza project. It should be noted that the School District plans a High School on their 54.99 acre site. Development of the school site is contingent on a bond issue. The school district has indicated that a bond AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plua.AZ.RZ. PP. CUP. doc Mayor, Council and P&:�_' March 20, 2000 Page 3 issue for the high school will be submitted for a vote in the fall of 2000. If approved, construction of the school will take place in 2001. 4. On July 19, 1999, the APA (COMPASS) Board of Directors moved the proposed Locust Grove/I-84 overpass from the Destination 2020 Plan (soft projection) to the Transportation Improvement Plan (hard planning document). APA projects a dramatic increase in traffic for South Locust Grove when the overpass is constructed and they support a transportation management plan be developed for this project to coordinate the commuter needs of future residents and employees. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (All Applications) Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for non- domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements. 4. Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 5. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 6. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section. 7. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 8. Provide five -foot -wide sidewalks in accordance.with City Ordinance. 9. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plat .AZ.RZTRCUP.doc Mayor, Council and P& March 20, 2000 Page 4 na ANNEXATION & ZONING REQUIREMENTS (File AZ -00-004) The legal description submitted in the application appears to meet the requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission. The parcel is contiguous to the existing corporate city limits of Meridian. 2. Staff agrees with the Applicant's forecast that the Overland/Locust Grove area will become a major intersection, especially with the construction of the I-84/Locust Grove overpass. Staff also agrees that neighborhood commercial services are needed in this area to service the existing residential subdivisions and proposed apartment complex residents. However, we do not support the proposed C -G zone. Staff recommends a lower -intensity commercial zone Neighborhood Commercial (C N). All of the proposed uses listed in item #10 of the application (retail,, day care, and office) are permitted either outright or with a CUP in both the C -N and C -G. But there are several uses permitted in the C -G that are prohibited in the C -N, including auto repair, service stations, hotels, truck stops, heavy equipment sales and auto sales lots. Given the previously stated concerns of the Sportsman Pointe and Los Alamitos residents and the increased number of children in the apartment complex, Staff feel the down -zoned C -N is a more appropriate zone and will adequately meet the development intentions of the Applicant. 3. The subject lots can be adequately served by public facilities, and the proposed uses will allow for orderly expansion of the city limits. 4. A Development Agreement will be required as a condition of annexation Annexation Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the annexation but denial of the requested C -G zone. We recommend C -N zoning. REZONE REQUIREMENTS (File RZ-00-003) The legal description submitted in the application appears to meet the requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission. 2. Staff agrees with the proposed Limited Office (L -O) zone. It is the most appropriate zone for the proposed mixed uses within the Planned Development. The subject lot can be adequately served by public facilities, and the proposed uses will allow for orderly expansion of the city limits. 4. A Development Agreement will be required as a condition of rezone. Rezone Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the rezone with the requested L -O zone. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-007, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&"—," March 20, 2000 Page 5 PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL COMMENTS (File PP -00-006) 1. Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 2. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 3. Assessment fees for water and sewer service are determined during the building plan review process. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Re -Assessment Agreement with the City of Meridian for all commercial uses. An assessment agreement is a vehicle that protects the City of Meridian and the Developer in the event that estimated assessments are not in line with actual usages. The agreement provides for reimbursement to the developer for over payment of assessments and payment to the City of Meridian of any shortfall in assessments. The overpayment/shortfall is determined after adequate historical usage. PRLIMINARY PLAT REQUIREMENTS (File PP -00-006) 1 • Sanitary sewer service to this site will be via extensions from the Five Mile Trunk that is currently under construction by this applicant. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline. 2• Water service to this site will be via extensions from newly constructed mains under the interstate, and from extensions of existing mains installed in adjacent developments. Applicant will be responsible to construct the water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Please provide the Public works department with information on anticipated fire flow and domestic water requirements for the proposed site. Water service to this development is contingent upon positive results from a hydraulic analysis by our computer model. Flow and pressure from the existing mains should be monitored with the Meridian Water Department. 3. Two -hundred -fifty- and 100 -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 4. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on site. Please submit hook-up and design details based on the proposed landscaping. Due to the size of landscaped area, primary water supply connection to the City's mains will not be allowed. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Pla a.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&�` March 20, 2000 Page 6 n Applicant has not indicated whether the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and maintained by an association or the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. If the system is being proposed as a private system, plans and specifications for the irrigation system shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department as part of the development plan. review process. A draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system O&M manual must be submitted prior to plan approval. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area. 6. Show all existing easements for irrigation/drainage facilities located within the boundaries of this proposed development (i.e. Hunter Lateral easements). 7. Detailed landscape plans for the Overland Road and Locust Grove Road landscape frontage buffers and for street landscaping along Millenium Way and Celebration Avenue shall be submitted for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat application. This requirement does not include interior lot landscaping. Interior landscaping will be dealt with on a site by site review basis with future CUP applications. A letter of credit or cash surety will be required for the improvements prior to signature on the Final Plat. 8. Staff recommends the Overland and Locust Road landscape buffers be platted as separate common lots within the subdivision and maintenance be the responsibility of the Development Committee/Association. The draft CC&Rs submitted with the application states each separate lot owner in the subdivision will be responsible for construction, installation and maintenance of landscaping on each building site. By placing responsibility for the arterial landscape buffers with a single entity (the Association), greater consistency of design and maintenance may be achieved. At a minimum, the landscape buffers shall be placed within a permanent landscape easement designated as such on the plat. No easements are currently shown. 9. Six -foot -high, permanent perimeter fencing shall be required along the eastern boundary of Lot 1, Block 3, and Lot 2, Block 1, and along the southern boundary of Lot 15 & 16, Block 1. Submit detailed fencing plans for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat. All required fencing is to be in place prior to issuance of building permits. 10. The Applicant is proposing to construct a fence along the east boundary of the Hunter Lateral. Staff recommends the Lateral be piped and no fence constructed. Given the close proximity of the proposed 200 unit apartment complex, High School, and Daycare, staff recommends the applicant be required to comply with Ord.12-4-13 (Piping of AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ.PP. CUP. doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 7 Ditches). The City required the developers of Raven Hill and Los Alamitos subdivisions (upstream from subject site) to tile the Hunter and see no reason this site should receive an exemption from the piping ordinance. 11. Applicant shall provide a vehicular access across the Hunter Lateral from the proposed apartment complex (Site `B") to the proposed Office/Retail area (Site "A"). The purpose of this connection is to minimize the vehicular impact on Overland Road and to provide an internal connection to the Daycare and Retail sites. The Transportation Impact Study submitted by Dobie Engineering, Inc. assumed 20% of the office and day care traffic would be captured within the complex. However, this capturing cannot take place unless an internal access road is provided. If a connection is not provided across the Hunter, an additional 20% of vehicle trips would be added to Overland Road (based on Dobie's estimations). 12. Applicant has provided the minimum required 35 feet of landscape buffer along Overland Road, an entryway corridor. Staff agrees. They show 25 feet of landscape buffer along Locust Grove Road (including the 5 foot wide detached sidewalk). Since Locust Grove is not listed as an entryway corridor, Staff supports the 25 -foot buffer width for this arterial. At a minimum, the Overland Road landscape buffer must be completed from the eastern property boundary to 30 feet west of Millenium Way prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy for any building within the subdivision. 13. Applicant is proposing a 30 -foot wide private road (Y2K Lane) to serve Lot 6 and 8, Block 1. Applicant should explain the purpose for the private classification and whether or not sidewalks will be provided. All private roads must approved by the City Council. Staff questions the intent of the private classification, particularly when this will be the first drive providing access into the site for eastbound traffic on Overland and will likely be heavily used. If approved, Staff recommends 5 -foot sidewalks be provided on at least one (1) side of the road. Preliminary Plat Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions: a) additional fencing is provided, b) the Hunter Lateral is tiled, c) provide a single vehicular connection across the Hunter Lateral, and d) landscaping is provided and constructed per item 412. Until the City receives a copy of the ACHD report, the public hearing should be continued. CUP (PUD/COMMERCIAL) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-017) 1. As part of a conditional use permit, the City of Meridian may impose restrictions and conditions in addition to current City Ordinances. 2. This Conditional Use Permit is for the overall concept only. Future phases of the project will require separate Conditional Use Permits for each phase and each must substantially comply with the final approved Concept Plan. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ,RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 8 3. Conceptually (based upon the submitted Overall Preliminary Site Plan dated 2-01-00), staff believes the project is in accord with the purpose of Planned Developments as outlined in the Subdivision & Development Ordinance. The mixed residential, office, recreation and retail uses meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and should contribute to a reduction in traffic in this area. 4. Planned Development Regulations: As a mixed/planned use development, the Resolution Plaza development must comply with the following sections of the subdivision ordinance: 12-6-4 Procedures for Planned Developments, 12-6-6 General Regulations for Planned Development, and 12-6-7 General Standards for Planned Developments. In addition, residential areas must comply with 12-6-8-A Design Standards for Planned Development -Residential. All commercial and office uses must comply with 12-6-8-B Design Standards for Planned Development -Commercial. 5. Colored Rendering: Colored renderings of the development must be submitted prior to the City Council meeting to meet the intent of Section 12-6-4 of the PD ordinance. 6. Open Space: All Planned Developments (PD) are required to have at least 10% of the gross land area of the PD as common open space as 12-6-7-E-5. The total common open space calculation for Resolution Plaza is shown separately on Sheets 1-3 (Sites "A" — "C"). Site "A" is 4.53 acres (1.44 required), Site `B" is 5.29 acres (1.45 required), and Site "C" is 4.10 acres (1.86 required). These calculations include landscape buffers and islands. Standard practice has been that residential PD's cannot count required buffers and landscape setbacks toward the 10% open space requirement, but commercial PD's have been allowed to count it. Total gross site acreage for the Resolution Plaza project is 47.04 acres (excluding public rights-of-way). 10% open space would be 4.7 acres. The minimum amount of open space has been met. All open space delineated as common open space must meet all standards of 12-6-7-E. 7. Parking: The matrix below summarizes the total off-street parking counts for the conceptual PD -C: Site / Use Parking Proposed Parking Required Site "A" - Retail pads N of first driveway (3) 257 250 - Retail & office pads b/w driveways (2) 183 181 - Office &_day care pads S of second driveway 189 100 (est.) Site "A" Total 629 531 Site `B" (Apartment complex) 553* 460 (2.3/d.u.) Site "C" - Retail & office pads on Y2K Lane (2) 156 151 AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z --� March 20, 2000 Page 9 - LDS Seminar - Office buildin s S of Gala St. (2) 17 129 20 (est.) 98 - Retail & office buildings N of Gala St. (2) 317 287 - Ice Arena 278 286 (1/5 seats) *The Applicant is proposing 152 tandem parking spaces for the complex. The P&Z Commission discouraged tandem parking for a proposed apartment complex of similar size in October 1999 (Valerie Heights). If the tandem parking is subtracted from the total parking spaces, their total provided would be 401 spaces. On the Site "A" plan, a row of parking is proposed along the south edge of the north driveway and along both the north and south edges of the south driveway with no separation. Given the likelihood of these private driveways receiving high volumes of traffic at build -out (functioning more as public roads), Staff feels this design would be unsafe and should be relocated. The first parking stalls are less than 40 feet from the property line and vehicles backing out of the stalls into the drive aisle will likely be a hazard for vehicles entering the site off Locust Grove. The proposed Ice Arena seats a total of 1,430 people. Technically, the Applicant meets City ordinance, which is based on one stall for every 5 seats. If one assumes the arena will utilize the parking north of Gala Street for evening events, an additional 317 stalls could feasibly be added to serve the arena, providing a total of 595 stalls. The Applicant should provide more detail on the hours of operation for the ice arena and their experience with other similar venues and whether or not both rinks will be used simultaneously. 8. Parking Lot Landscaping: Landscape islands serving a single row of parking shall have one tree. Islands serving a double row of parking shall have two trees. A minimum of one 3" caliper tree per 1500 square feet of asphalt (including driveways connecting from the loop road) is required per City Ordinance. 9. Streets and Circulation: Staff agrees with the proposed stub road (Gala Street) to the east, unplatted property. As stated in the Preliminary Plat comments, we recommend access be provided internally with a connection between Sites "A" and `B". There is a conflict between the Concept Plan and Plat for the Seminary site. The plat proposes a flag lot for Lot 4, Block 1 (the proposed 19,648 s.f. office building), with the flag serving as the driveway. However, the Concept Plan shows the seminary utilizing the flag driveway, not the office. Staff does not disagree with the design, but it should be noted for future cross access agreements. 10. Signage: The Applicant submitted a letter from Idaho Electric Signs regarding signage for the apartment complex and a letter from Patrick McKeegan outlining intent for the ice arena signage. The monument signs shall not exceed 70 s.f. All signage throughout the PD -C shall be coordinated and complement building materials and themes. This applies to all future buildings. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00.015 Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ. PP.CUP.doe Mayor, Council and P&Z --� March 20, 2000 Page 10 11. Storage Areas: Per Ordinance 12-6-8.A.1, Storage areas shall be provided for the anticipated needs of boats, campers, motorhomes, and trailers. No such areas are designated on the Site Plan. Applicant shall either provide a storage area adequate to serve every two (2) living units or provide evidence that storage needs can be met through an alternative method. 12. Maintenance Building: A maintenance building or approved area shall be provided that is suitable for the services required for the repair and maintenance of all common areas as per Section 9-607.H.3. 13. Trash Enclosures: No trash enclosures are shown on the Conceptual Site Plan. Staff recommends all such areas be situated outside of view from either Overland or Locust Grove Roads. Applicant shall coordinate locations and construction requirements of the required trash enclosures with Meridian Sanitary Service, Inc., and provide a letter of approval from their office when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. 14. Hours of Operation: No details of hours of operation are provided. For the future CUP applications, all office and retail uses should be harmonious with the apartment complex and residential homes to the west. 15. Alternative Transportation Options: At build -out, this site will serve as a principal center of employment for the east Meridian/west Boise area. While Boise Urban Stages does not currently service Overland Road, it has the potential to be a likely destination point for mass transit in the future. Staff strongly recommends an area be designated and/or preserved on the Concept Plan for a future bus stop. We also recommend the inclusion of bicycle racks at all office and retail buildings and the ice hockey arena. 16. All conditions placed on this application shall run with the land and shall not lapse or be waived as the result of any change in tenancy or ownership of any or all of the lands governed by this CUP application. All such conditions shall be deemed the requirements for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any use or structure as per City Ordinance. 17. Applicant shall utilize the Ada County Highway District design standards for the private street within this development, with the exception of width requirements. Street designs shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Meridian Public Works Department. PD -C Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the concept plan with the above conditions. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ.PP. CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 11 CUP (APARTMENT COMPLEX) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-017) 1. All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site "B" (apartment complex) shall be incorporated here. 2. The Applicant is proposing to construct the complex in two (2) phases, with the first phase consisting of approximately 140 units and the clubhouse. Staff recommends the number of units constructed in phase 1 be limited to a maximum of thirty (30) dwelling units and that no more units be granted occupancy until Overland Road capacity is improved. Overland Road between Locust Grove and Eagle Road is currently a two-lane, non - signalized arterial. Numerous traffic concerns have been entered into the public record regarding the capacity of both Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. Traffic was cited as one of the principal reasons for the City's denial of the proposed Sundance Apartments at the NW corner of Locust Grove Road and Overland Road last Fall. Dobie Engineering's traffic study lists Overland Road (east of Locust Grove Road) as having 11,230 vehicles/day in 7/98. Over the past twenty (20) months, this figure has certainly increased; especially factoring in the new homes built in Sherbrooke Hollows to the south. Dobie's study estimates 1,170 new trips/day to be generated by the apartment complex and 335 new trips/day generated by the ice arena. The study also projects a Level of Service "F" for the left -turn outs from all three Overland Road driveways until signals are installed. The study further assumes the high school, potentially slated for construction in 2001 (which is the same year as the apartment complex), will generate 3,000 trips/day and 250 peak hour trips. Overland Road is designated in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as a 5 -lane arterial with bike lanes to be constructed in 2005. Staff believes that limiting new development on the subject site, to the Ice Arena and thirty (30) apartments would facilitate a smoother transition for the neighborhoods and ease the impact on Overland Road until such time as it is widened and signalized. 3. All applicable Fair Housing and ADA requirements for multi -family housing must be met, including accessibility design for the ground floor units. Handicap parking shall be provided to serve the Clubhouse. CUP (Apartments) Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the condition that only the clubhouse and thirty (30) dwelling units receive occupancy until Overland Road is improved. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. CUP ("THE POND" ICE ARENA) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-015) 1. All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site "C" (ice arena) shall be incorporated here. 2. A minimum of seven (7) handicap accessible spaces must be provided to directly serve this AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP,CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 12 facility. Only two (2) are shown. Revise site plan accordingly. CUP (Ice Arena) Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS The 1993 Comprehensive Plan contains a variety of goals and policies relevant to this application. The following sections most directly apply to the proposed project and are repeated here for the Council and Commission's consideration during the hearing process. Goal 3 is "to encourage the kind of economic growth and development which supplies employment and economic self-sufficiency for existing and future residents, reduces the present reliance on Boise and strengthens the City's ability to finance and implement public improvements, services, and its open space character." Goal 4 is "to provide housing opportunities for all economic groups within the community." Goal 8 is "to establish compatible and efficient use of land through the use of innovative and functional site design." Economic Development 1.1 The City of Meridian shall make every effort to create a positive atmosphere that encourages... commercial enterprises to locate in Meridian. 1.3 The character, site improvements and type of new commercial or industrial developments should be harmonized with the natural environment and respect the unique needs and features of each area. Land Use 1 AU Encourage new development that reinforces the City's present development pattern of higher density development within the Old Town area and lower density development in outlying areas. 1.8U Promote the development of high-quality and environmentally compatible residential areas that contain the necessary parks, schools and commercial facilities to maintain and form identifiable neighborhoods. 2.1U Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi -family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities. 2.2U Support strategies for the development of neighborhood parks within all residential areas. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z ~ March 20, 2000 Page 13 lo�, 2.3U Protect and maintain residential neighborhood property values, improve each neighborhood's physical condition and enhance its quality of life for residents. 4.8U Encourage commercial uses, offices and medical -care uses to locate in the Old Town district, business parks, shopping centers and near high-intensity activity areas, such as freeway interchanges. 6.8U New urban density subdivisions which abut or are proximal to existing rural residential land uses shall provide screening and transitional densities with larger, more comparable lot sizes to buffer the interface between the urban level densities and rural residential densities. Transportation 1.4U Monitor and coordinate the compatibility of the land use and transportation system. 1.20U Encourage proper design of residential neighborhoods to ensure their safety and tranquility. Open Space, Parks and Recreation 2.5U New subdivision development... will be considered as opportunities to ... encourage the development of recreational open spaces and parks as part of new planned developments. Ho_ using 1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide diversity of housing types ... in a variety of locations suitable for residential development. 1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping centers shall be encouraged. 1.6 Housing proposals shall be phased with transportation, open space and public service and facility plans, which will maximize benefits to the residents, minimize conflicts and provide a tie-in between new residential areas and service needs. 1.19 High-density development, where possible, should be located near open space corridors or other permanent major open space and park facilities, and near major access thoroughfares. Communitv Design 5.2 Ensure that all new development enhances rather than detracts from the visual quality of its surroundings, especially in areas of prominent visibility. 6.5U Establish land -use designations that reflect the character of existing neighborhoods. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 14 6.11 U Promote well-planned and well -designated affordable housing in all Meridian neighborhoods. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaz AZ.RZTP.CUP.doc MAYOR NUB OF TREASURE VALLEY Robert D. Corrie A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT CITY OF MERIDIAN 2°8) 1-88-2499 Fax 288.25°' CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO PUBLIC PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT T-IF�rPU % • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROTECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000 FILE NUMBER: CUP -00-015 REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE FOR "THE POND" ICE ARENA CONSISTING OF OFFICE, PRO SHOP, FITNESS CENTER, RESTAURANT, LOCKER ROOMS, EQUIPMENT ATORAGE AND ARENAS ZONED LO BY: PAT MCKEEGAN (REPRESENTATIVE FOR LEE SMITH ICE ARENA) LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED) SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR _RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C _TAMMY de WEERD, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE BUILDING DEPARTMENT IRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER _CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL) YOURnOp4¢ISE REMARKS: '` MAYOR ��fZobert D. Corrie _CCIITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tammy deWeerd Cherie McCandless HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 - Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 - Fax 288-2501 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13. 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: _February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 21-2000 FILE NUMBER: CUP -00-015 REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE FOR "THE POND" ICE ARENA CONSISTING OF OFFICE PRO SHOP FITNESS CENTER RESTAURANT LOCKER ROOMS EQUIPMENT ATORAGE AND ARENAS ZONED LO BY: PAT MCKEEGAN (REPRESENTATIVE FOR LEE SMITH ICE ARENA) LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED) SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR _RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C TAMMY de WEERD, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE _BUILDING DEPARTMENT _FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER _CITY PLANNER 'FECIBYV_j� FEB 2 9 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS:_/% RECEIVED FEB 2 g 2000 Meridian City Water t te;r�ealt W 8 6 1 o 1 W LANE 2 BLOCK 4 -w BLOCK 3 GALA ST. 9 -4/ 3 5 1 4 BLOCK 1 PROPOSED RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY CK ST BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. N BRIGGS wC (208) 3449700 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD BOISE, IDAHO 83705 1 2 PROPOSED ICE RINK SITE R-4 3°° CONDITIONAL USE F THE POND ICE F RESOLUTION SUBDIV. PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, DESIGN DRAFT SCALE DATE BKB 1" = 300' 1 01127/00 C -G C� n w <Z w CL Q 0CD 0 n CD0 O y m m V m 0 Cb 0 0 CD mCbs Q � a � o CD m lb x 0 — w°�jOccoi � p n c w m N m N � (� A 3Mw S _ v w d 0 c w o w uw2O703 3.o w ° c'3 w o o N c oox, �m CD w C �7 N o o MR m w o � m o� N Cw_ m w ° 3 n O O y D O W N O N N 3 3 . c N D O O w d O N � � 7 (ny p N X O (D 0�03'O 7 O w 00 O x 3. y 3 S N p w m c 3 m URD 3 �. 3cv D y y R ID a N-0 p c 9 j ? O P v o-� gam' G 00 C 2.00D ao. 3 o m° p S. Sx >ID - N C n N (D tl 7 O - w � m w o CL ] _ N �3c3t»: w_ v m o 2 n =01 mCD a m Ui N a ; (D m p❑❑ 0 c (D N C) U) Z (D 0 oCD a ° c m 7 m 0< C a G Q CD o. N ID _n wCDD (D N N Qp 0 x (D I CD Qaw N CL -n .0 ID N = (D In w o (D O 0 _. CD CD U) 7px w.N n Al CD � Cp -n CD p CD C 33 T N r- _r 1 s 1 w Cn W N j CO co �I U I A W N 1CD O G 21 m a _ i Q 3 N N N O. CD CD O m o c D CD CD C� n w <Z w CL Q 0CD 0 n CD0 O y m m V m 0 Cb 0 0 CD mCbs Q � a � o CD m lb x 0 — w°�jOccoi � p n c w m N m N � (� A 3Mw S _ v w d 0 c w o w uw2O703 3.o w ° c'3 w o o N c oox, �m CD w C �7 N o o MR m w o � m o� N Cw_ m w ° 3 n O O y D O W N O N N 3 3 . c N D O O w d O N � � 7 (ny p N X O (D 0�03'O 7 O w 00 O x 3. y 3 S N p w m c 3 m URD 3 �. 3cv D y y R ID a N-0 p c 9 j ? O P v o-� gam' G 00 C 2.00D ao. 3 o m° p S. Sx >ID - N C n N (D tl 7 O - w � m w o CL ] _ N �3c3t»: w_ v m o 2 n =01 mCD a m Ui N a ; (D m p❑❑ 0 c (D N C) U) Z (D 0 oCD a ° c m 7 m 0< C a G Q CD o. N ID _n wCDD (D N N Qp 0 x (D I CD Qaw N CL -n .0 ID N = (D In w o (D O 0 _. CD CD U) 7px w.N n Al CD � Cp -n CD p CD C 33 T N