The URL can be used to link to this page

Resolution Business Park AZ 00-004CITY CLERK FILE CHECKLIST Project Name: Resolution Business Park File No. AZ 00-004 Date Received from Planning and Zoning Department: Unknown Planning and Zoning Level: Hearing Date: E Transmittals to agencies and others: Notice to newspaper with publish dates: 03/10/00 Certifieds to property owners: Q Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: Notes: March 22, 2000 and 03/17/00 March 8, 2000 T] Approve 0 Deny Second hearing on May 9, 2000 City Council Level: QTransmittals to agencies and others: 0 Notice to newspaper with publish dates: LCJ Certifieds to property owners: Q City Council Action: Hearing Date: June 6, 2000 n/a 5-19-00 and 06/02/00 � EJ Approve [] Deny LJ Findings / Conclusions / Order received from attorney on: 411— &= CjL� Notes: Findings / Conclusions / Order: Approved b Council: vv� / by e �v `� V (. Resolutions: Original Disbursed: Copies Dis Res / Copy Cert: Minutebook Copy Res / Copy Cert: City Clerk I " 1 v !Z- --� City Engineer Findings Recorded City Planner City Attomey Development Agreement: Starting Codifiers Project File Sent for signatures: Copy Res / Original Cert: Ada County (CPAs) " Applicant (non -CPAs) EJSigned by all parties: Recorded Ordinances: Approved by Original: Minutebook Copies to: City Clerk Council: State F] Recorded: Tax Comm. SterlingCodifiers City Attorney Copies Disbursed: City Engineer City Planner No. Resolution No. Project file ApplOrdinance (ifrder) Findings Findings /Orders: Approved by Council: Original: Minutebook E]Project Recorded: Copies to: Applicant file Deadline: 10 days City Engineer ❑ Published in newspaper: City Planner city Attorney Copies Disbursed: " Record Vacation FindingsEl Recorded Development Agreements: Original: Fireproof File Copies to:Applicant Project file City Engineer City Planner City Attorney Y C d d a H T d d C. E O U m n:oU� m mo m ai mQ np L U C `O N .0 E N N N y C m C U C a cc E N N O d� J, c ac� x o Eow- o . , d £ ° o L LO o n�LL n Ea .8 c° o mo a V n N N C m - ° D _- N d m - m N a) O -O_ -.,,e Cc Ep O� ro a�aci�E�L E LL QEcE cU O N cin c O RS 00 �O 2 wLL °�c mO 0`'Ea°ii`�m -)- m� E >L -o r tE= (D N Uy LL Em'Ro$m ° mEp" a° c n p° n U 0 � E c4 O.L. U N V W N O N l=C H N D '� LL to N U -cam ''=E c E cc m° CL LL N m T O O �O U p - � 0 o �00a°a'E�c Y Z m0 V Via° .� N ❑❑ ai p drnoErnm 0f»Eo> 0 El E U m E E L m N u N E> o c 0roomoa a a L U O N W U' c c p a°imom10 ° 0CD .. Q c Q 0 n N C CO Ew OU ' N (aL U '-E _ 2 m a a I]> ❑ ❑ o � i� E v N _ 70 LL 7 N d 1 N N N T n m N O C W U N t U o ° D- E] D❑❑❑❑ a yl,,'� 2 ]] o v � M } m a m E v\ rv\ � ,{ ' U \ AUT \ N 0 N d 0 oa m R � \ v � N 7 y Z.E o > 1 :4 chi o �¢ e "�J _ UE N = Z a +~ oa m U) a a� c E � C d L ad Z aN Z Q J T N co Ln CO I� co D) CO r T T T T T ~ J Y C d d a H T d d C. E O U § / C', m n � n o ¥ = o Q 0 | |C E 4) ¢ � N N 0 "o ¢ LL U C N N (0:)- Y 0- w E U LL ' U o m mx a) Cc: LL acc E a U m N _ LL X U O Q Cc 0 'n, ¢m ¢ LL d p �c z O N U U m= o' U El o a � m m c> =o m U � N o > N U C Q O aiC Z 75 Or'a0i c � ¢ U G Oca E..0 O O (0 L r ¢ U x U ❑r E3 .. m •� m E a o N�0 a� N CL a) �5o a .o 00 �cw¢5o m U ❑ ❑❑❑ a p FM N c c�� d QE - z � °°a Nd y (Q Q� C T N M LO CO co 0)T T T T T Z o � m E 5 m C a'U) N N O CO O U C r- 62 g E w c m -- - a .Sm � � N 0 KC x C. o YO E o W n E> L j p L o O Hid Ute. E U T C N E DaNa m N c , y p 0 C E C L a) � C U N UO -p `7 p O1 p C m G m m E > L Ew'xo$m c°Eopa owL 6 N!n c `d c,4.2 m E � E p U t0p_i0 _ U N C O N u C C a d a Eo ID a m o o �`0o�vim d 6g E rn m a). = u T�u3Eoo 7 C O tl U > o o C E L j c 0 '.2 c o a m . a pamup •� 'p m O O N c m d m m C c c d apiviomm L F R'nin R m I IC d 0) m 0 a 2D Q CL o c co CO n0 M I> E z 0 o a LO �_j a \� 01 N 0 � C momaimQ aoL U c�- g 1�nd1°°m �2 OC E Q C � U C C N C `Icl A m E EoWaE> . a c .� o \ a).0. L C 0 C O L 0 O F N a' 3U a Q LL EE 0 macmm pN'0 rn N EpOULL _ m 0o-0�oc O U ll N C0 O N O O a O m N@ U C cC=_ LLE O O 0 Ua W N-� n L 7 C N � co Oy C �v m c = E r(r(D � = EN V ?aN E -o 0 C E O -OO QE C y o 9 c Z co m0 ad Ecc ° a0� o Y UUF '� 08. poim N El El U Q g ID U 0 0 c 0 ca E� o N -oma >oEy N� o=FL-�c o o n N C .2J c m c O O m -0 C C U = 0 co V O N ` 0 a O '00 ` j U U 0,> 1 �� D L 0 2 E G C U _ O a ro J E w 0 LO) 0rin \ 0 C — N 0 U5� 0 E❑ LL w V 0 CL 2 .— r a 01 Nzt YwCC s0cu °' El ❑❑❑ N O 1 a CL LL o N N t 1 m cc U U \ll N AL¢Z E a o� � c ! a m U ami 0) c Z .0 a p fn C T N LO c co p T r T N r M T T to T b0i F J Zai .a Q co E 0 LL U) a. E m AL m a�aai a: LL C N N a E O �% O U LL ' U ca y � m r a) o CL Uti aro*. E D0 U4 m v cc U) �LL N 41 X U O 9 o U m Q ,_- l coN cr m CC LL i O m C d D0 Y C Z N O U m2 v El El p D m m � c> a R t m CD a m a U Q C O a ;6 E �Sm � o = rn CC O V C C R E�RU : S c N R N CLU c0 cr) ❑ ❑ .. m LL E O m N -D Z '� E a�5 O a m N CC C .J� UW @ U ❑ ❑❑❑ CL oR r v r In CO It I-_ C'.O 1 O) I Cr I T I r I CO CO l r 0�yaim m °ac cne R mocaam¢ O.O U C p •�• lOf7 N N� .� E w c m c U R Emnoumc ENE'm�� cl xco.c',�o E.2 w aE > m T o 0; o IL-� y�U> R O j C N a0 E ` R m mm'�E�L y E E U cc c N p p c 'm ASE`>L N N R O D U C W L N C N R E w d c O N T ,Q U R E ctl _ U O_N O 00 N c N C aED'- d o a m o O — N N d �m w c E > 7 C -0E tEtl U > ._ E aC o y o ", E r c m c° R~ c o a R E°uc a. w C g ro R ,2d Rmc a�=c�CLL CI] O Y c N 3 C o a ti C U m a �- o m � U a C -� E a N U a 0 00 ECO D Z> �c CD a m a oa o0 ac cr) ; m Z '� o D R U- oR r F J CL LY E � a) m 'TO'� ¢ LL O C N ]C3N N cd co)- Y aoi v.- O N O u)ti U L O p U- CL CO "Z= co _ � N ca LL x U O t] QN U cu o y �LL CC m �LL Q 3 d C � O 7 O NY c Z �U U m= a a) � 7 7 � C > C U a) O V ca 0 a U Z E �c m cc U 7 r – 2 Q U ❑❑❑❑ E `L a O � aoN�' CL o = Oo Y W Q O U❑❑❑❑ a.. _V \rn J� '-Q ff v N N = N d c m c envU10 9O N a)iaQ O.OL U G� cF»E= °g NE C U a a) v jN N 0 a) E as E E C X C o W n EO O > L 2 O L O F � a U > .in�3�a a1 U T C � a3 d u –E E aci m `m c E c L ' E U V C N C N' o N N E > L E N X O V {p CL °n aw(D c� C L )n m -S pi — E� O C N O O E U w E U p N C n) U O Y rn N O C O C- C 5 O C C6 a) - E m Rm w c w E > ID g O U > —0 cE' � o c E� Lc m o U c o m.2 o a 2 0. cc c mZi�Lo �'mE'm d N c V N j V U .O Y O N C N N N O =��E=�a L a) N O al F O'p_C0�(n m 0 �c 0 a n E N Q a - Q Z ° -c 0~0 E N M C U) a) d d C 1 V 7> Z p LL N y Y lC C w c T N M d' LO CO I� D) r T T T T r- d Z J ( \ N cU E AL LL QLL :D cu m n SOC LL E O O O O C p c% = m o cl-OULL aC= E a U m o r ca U LL N a> X U 0 9 N U° Q ca O :F; LL Q N Li � o N C O _ F.-.2 ID czv ❑❑ cu m m c > 1� i 1 2@ > c m � U _ Aaz V Q C O 1°dr �( d d E ap N N '- C CY. {o Q z O CL D U C ld Ew_ QU U J E a LL _ N O N a) .0 N e Q d N C, U OU Y W ccc El DO CL N N N C iacUm io m ai mQ l O t U C n O 2 A � - =� E y `� U C N N C K C X C '� O E a v o L p o nm3-a E 0 > c m E V5 E E cL y U D d p D 0 _ N EC-0 c'm 'rnm c ca E y X O V m CL E o ° a C w L G U c U C U N E c o E E N d c �O U p _ m O O N C amaE�. d o a m o m rn r d mg I - � w E o 0 O C O (0 m U mE o o o F -mon c .� m °0oo«�m ZC mZ5 Ev UONa D0 H0) +' _ c_ w N N C N •O ID a F- ° 65 l0 to O I I C _!j Y �L a 3 o V d a a � co 1 a ^ N N V1 N U_ N 0 � a0 0 0 �a E �o J d Z.> N (D 0 I T I N co I d N m Ln LO r --co T T T T T 1� i 1 m � U Aaz 1°dr �( d d E ap N {o Q z O C T N N N C iacUm io m ai mQ l O t U C n O 2 A � - =� E y `� U C N N C K C X C '� O E a v o L p o nm3-a E 0 > c m E V5 E E cL y U D d p D 0 _ N EC-0 c'm 'rnm c ca E y X O V m CL E o ° a C w L G U c U C U N E c o E E N d c �O U p _ m O O N C amaE�. d o a m o m rn r d mg I - � w E o 0 O C O (0 m U mE o o o F -mon c .� m °0oo«�m ZC mZ5 Ev UONa D0 H0) +' _ c_ w N N C N •O ID a F- ° 65 l0 to O I I C _!j Y �L a 3 o V d a a � co 1 a ^ N N V1 N U_ N 0 � a0 0 0 �a E �o J d Z.> N (D 0 I T I N co I d N m Ln LO r --co T T T T T NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho at the hour of 6:30 p.m. on March 22, 2000 for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of G.L. Voigt Development/Overland, LLC for annexation and zoning of 16.119 acres from R -T to CG for proposed Resolution Business Park which is generally located south of Overland and east of Locust Grove. Furthermore, the application requests a rezone of 37.64 acres from R-4 to LO and a conditional use permit for commercial development consisting of multi -family, office and seminary. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 1St day of March 2000. ) -, (; � WILLIAM G. BERG, JR/,, CItY CLERK t`�,nnr�srrrrrrr \'\\N\\\ OF Cj PUBLISH March 10 and 17, 2000. AL - s �\ v NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho at the hour of 6:30 p.m. on March 22, 2000 for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of Pat McKeegan (Lee Smith Ice Arena) for a conditional use permit for an ice arena consisting of office, pro shop, fitness center, restaurant, locker room and equipment storage generally located south of Overland and east of Locust Grove Road. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 1St day of March, 2000. WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CITY CLERK v\,�\or- \v��trstrltrrrrrr PUBLISH March 10 and 17, 2000. �o SEAL _- 76 0Ovaa Y�,,`,o�. rrr11r311;1 1100\\` D '-1 86 3 1 1 W J W BLOCK 4 BLOCK 3 GALA ST. -4 3 5 4 BLOCK 1 PROPOSED RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN CITY IMITS BOUNDARY TICK ST --` ■ BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC N BRIGGS INC. (208) 344-9700 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD BOISE, IDAHO 83705 1 PROPOSED ICE RINK SITE C -G R-4 300 0 1 300 600 Feet CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST THE POND ICE RINK REVISION RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20, T.3N., R.IE., B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO SHEET 1 OF 1 DESIGN DRAFT SCALE DATE DWG. NO, BKB 1" = 300' 01/27/00 0101 I 10101.APR NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho at the hour of 6:30 p.m. on March 22, 2000 for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of G.L. Voigt Development/Overland, LLC for preliminary plat of 107.06 acres, LO and CG zoning for proposed Resolution Business Park which is generally located south of Overland and east of Locust Grove. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 1St day of March 2000. Z WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., 1TYCLERK W%11 rj!I rris,�f IF ME,- ()n PUBLISH March 10 and 17, 2000. �G UAL ��+lE;¢;}p Ei9iilt4l�� 97`7 �-63a9� 33 err ** TX CONFIRMF, _ON REPORT ** DATE TIME TO/FROM 05 03/02 09:5? 208 377 6309 AS OF MAR 02 'uO 09:58 PAGE.01 CITY OF MERIDIAN MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD# STATUS EC --S 01'12" 005 019 OK l alw_uz 1�bcc XA-�- 8Bg- ��F33 MAYOR Robert D. Corrie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 PUBLIC WORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000 FILE NUMBER: AZ -00-004 REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 16.119 ACRES FROM RT TO CG FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY: G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED) SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C _TAMMY de WEERD, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE _BUILDING DEPARTMENT _FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM & FINAL) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: CITY OF MERIDIAN ^ 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, ID 8364/ - Phone: (208) 888-4433 Fax: (208) 887-4813 APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OR REZONE F. 1 AZ- 00 - O04 PROPOSED NAME OF SUBDI•VISION: Resolution Business Park GENERAL LOCATION: NW 1/4 Section 20, T. 3N., R. IE TYPE (RESIDENTIAL, INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL): Commercial ACRES OF LAND IN PROPOSED REZONE: 16.119 Acres (includes R -O -W) PRESENT LAND USE: Vacant/Agricultural PROPOSED LAND USE: Planned Commercial Development PRESENT ZONING DISTRICT: RT (Rural Transition) PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT: CG ( General Retail & Service Commercial) APPLICANT: Overland, L.L.C. PHONE: 323-4002 ADDRESS: 6223 N. Discovery Way, Boise, Idaho 83713 ENGINEER, SURVEYOR, OR PLANNER: Briggs En ineering, Inc. PHONE: 344-9700 ADDRESS: 1800 W. Overland Road, Boise, Idaho 83705 OWNER(S) OF RECORD: Overland, L.L.C. PHONE: 323-4002 ADDRESS: 6223 N. Discovery Way, Boise Idaho 83713 0 10 1 \annex-rezone-mer.app2 OVERLAND L.L.C. (ANNEXATION) 1. Overland L.L.C., 6223 N. Discovery Way, Boise, Idaho 83713 (Phone: 323-4002). 2. Overland L.L.C., 6223 N. Discovery Way, Boise, Idaho 83713 (Phone: 323-4002). 3. Notarized request attached. 4. Legal description attached. 5. Vacant/Agricultural. 6. A Planned Commercial Development (Concept Approval Requested). 7, Existing Zoning: RT ( Rural Transition). 8. Proposed Zoning: CG ( General Retail & Service Commercial). 9. The parcel is located at the southeast corner of Locust Grove and Overland Roads, When Locust Grove is extended over Interstate 84, this will become a major intersection. A large amount of residential development has been constructed in this area. Additional residential development is proposed in this vicinity. The need for neighborhood commercial use will increase over time. 10. The parcel is a portion of a planned development. The development includes a neighborhood commercial center which will provide necessary goods and services for the surrounding subdivisions. Anticipated commercial uses include: video store, dry cleaners, deli, convenience store, grocery store, day care, office, ice rink, school and apartments. 11. The parcel is designated Mixed Planned Use Development. Existing uses to the north include: RV Park, Contractors yard, Equipment Dealer and (future) Freightliner Sales and Service Center. The proposed annexation will be consistent and compatible with the uses to the north. 12. 1" = 100 map attached. 13. 1" = 300 map (30 copies) attached. 14. List of property owners attached. 15. Fee attached. ($752.52) 16. Affidavit of Posting attached. 17. Affidavit of Accuracy attached. 0101\Overland LLC annex Jan -04-00 09:34A4ID The v,Y�,yv v_ p_02 J HN -U,.3 -404W 1 J Westpark Co 208$$89947 b7 ifn t uua cj," i t rccn i ,"j > A I w. STATE OF 10 AHO COUNTY OF ADA .!I } ss (name) AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST ./,..d, . -D.1). (address) • VAig being first duty sworn upon (state) oath, depose and say= That I the record owner and/or representative of the property described on the attached, nd I grant my permission to submit the accompanying application pertaining to that property. Dated is _'_day ofa no. c- r 4 (S' r { SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. 62 NotAq Public for Idaho Residing at (n e , La My Commission Expires: d��ggtiti'S•�'•"•• oli',��i t. 1'UBLt0 j % . p : TE OF 19 TOTAL TOTA P.02 JAN -04-2000 08:-54 96%, P. �;` ANNEXATION/REZONE DESCRIPTION FOR OVERLAND LLC PORTION OF RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION January 31, 2000 A parcel of land including a portion of the right-of-way of Locust Grove and Overland Road, lying in the NW 1/4 of Section 20, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Section 20, T. 3N., R. 1 E., B.M., the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; Thence S 00034'14" W 970.53 feet along the west line of the NW 1/4 to a point; Thence N 89059'19" E 849.95 feet to a point on the centerline of the Hunter Lateral; Thence N 05°29'17" W 140.30 feet along said centerline to a point; Thence N 16114'08" W 216.98 feet along said centerline to a point, Thence N 18°27'39" W 470.81 feet along said centerline to a point; Thence N 07006'04" W 175.77 feet along said centerline to a point on the centerline of Overland Road, which is also the north line of said NW 1/4-1 Thence N 89152'19" W 595.39 feet along said north line to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; Said parcel of land contains 16.119 acres more or less. Michael E. Marks, PLS - No. 4998 0101 Annexation.des o 00 ��AEL B.�Q4 rROVAL RY 0 9 00 MERNAAN PUBLIC WORKS DEPT., Mtcicta [end Tit: `10.03:: P. ?/3 wr'%/,� WtJUCLAIM DEED For Value iaaived pea stiiaackert�j� H r nett who accquired title as Pam Ste Tucker an unmarrfei person do hereby convey, mean, Papulae and formw quit &gm onto Overland 16 LLC wbOq current addrs" is 6223 nortb Discovery Way, Soise, Idaho 83717 the 10min= described pteteises, to.wit: See attaehsd WdUt "A" �J1lk-tS P11 - AMERICAN LAND TITLE CICORQED-REOUE$T ADA COUNTY RECORDER J BOISE. UANOROaQ FEE DEPUTY) l948MY-7 Phi 3:44 9804409ji *fW"an.W a,o*, ithmrob i I"&*Ed 0 to Its sxshftn, Inr jnWxwy ar affect on ftt .. bmwther wkh ter agporeeuam"& Dated: April 30, 1998 Pas Stsiaeckere Hartnett rr•'re or in"o, coup= or, o■ this 3 dar el - 1/9g. Wan me. a ---4 aa1 !K' 8 -4.p --mar EPPmAvd •�,,J�. a Pas scain�okir t .b lues it.6eisi new ...... Ii f ;4b"me b �UltrlbeiM {L`hltaa,�/tri[• a� �� •� : r . . :' C1 .1 +Pr. 30. 1953 t; l8PM pc�er::�o Laac "i t:. EXHIBIT A 2MI)WIM AT THR SWTIOII COMM CO1MON TO 51=10" 17, l e , 19 AND 20, IN T0lf SXXF 3 UMTH, RANGE 1 PAST, BOI88 MtRIDUM, ADA COUM, IDAMI %7qW= NORTH 95•31' CUT 593 FEET TO A POINT IN TSS CENTER OF A LATSRAI„ OP RIDzw&m QH CANAL' lmwcg DOW THE COrrzR OF SAID LATERAL, som 4.44' uAST ISO I'm ; THENC8 SOOTS 16.24' PAST 122 QST; THZ Cg SOUTH 19'36' SAS? 430 FtYTi THRNCs SOUTH 13.02'. RAST 360 FIi'1'; TBSNCE SOUTH 5*06' RAST 130 FIM; Tag SOUTH 5016' MT 130 TMJ TSE SOUTH ll•SO' RUT 130 F=i THENCR SOUTH 21.36' EAST 40 PSLTI TKCcH LIAVI)M SAID LATRRAL, SOUTH 69025' W28T 923 rMt THSNCS NORTH 1,32S.1 FEAT TO 'TRP SAID PLACE OF 93GIN ING. SAS TRWU T M TBS FOLL411= DESCRISPD PARCZL : A PAR= O! LAND IN Talo NORTIMMT QUARTER OF 39.CTION 10, TSNNSBIP 3 NOiLTH. RAMX 1 RAST, OF TRX soISB KPRrDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDA=, Balm MOR!< PAR'TICUL.ARLY DSSCRIMm AS T'OLLOMS: COMNMwcnm AT THE WORTHSAST CORmat OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, DOISE IdMIDI ; TKXN= SOUTH 0.34'14• EAST 1,325.09 F= ALONG THE WZST LINE OF SAID SECTION 20 TO THE MOR72MT CORNER OF RIM VI3'Oi S99DMSION; T wcx NORTH 19459'196 BAST 29-00 FM AIM T M MORTIGatLy BOO;MARY Or R= vm 408DIVISISN TO A Ponn ON TRE EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -MAY OF LOCUS? GRA'V3 ROAD. THE REAL POINT OP B11GII+Ra!nm OF THIS DRSCRIPTION; TIECKCH NORTH 0*34'14" EA6T 3S7.92 FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-wA,Y TO A POna, TRZZKB W RTH 99*59'19• EAST 424.96 FBbT TO A POINT ON nM CXWrHRUNg OF TIM KLJS = LATERALr ALMNG SAID CRNTERLIHB TSE FOLLOM37i0; TFZ= SOUTH 5.31'22• EAST 47.15 FZ9T TO A POINT; T$SiiC3 SOUTH 9*30'220 EAST 217.32 PEST TO A POINT; THZNCX SOUTH 16.11'23• RUT 94.94 FEET TO THE NORTS&&ST COR?RR OF RIM vrNW SUNDMSION) Tssars SOUTH 49.59-19• W98T 492.07 PRET ALONG TSS NORTH LING OF RIM VIP1f SUBDIVISION TO THE REAL Pon" OF "GINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTIOU. No. 0835 P, 3/3 AFFIDAVIT OF ACCURACY STATE OF IDAHO ) COUNTY OF ADA ) I, Beck Bowcutt Briggs Engineering Inc 1800 W Overland Road (name) (address) Boise Idaho being first duly sworn upon (city) (state) oath, depose and say: That I prepared the attached applications and the information contained is true and correct. (Preliminary Plat, Annexation, Re -zone, Conditional Use and Planned Unit Development) Dated this day of 2000 (Signature) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. ',4%��1Ise �,• .•`'��A WILS'•••. ,0TA*.p i U B LiG OF ID usann► 0 10 1 \affid-accuracy of ry Public for Idaho Residing at �©i E� My Commission Expires: -,Zd" S AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF IDAHO ) ss COUNTY OF ADA ) I, Donna Wilson Briggs Engineering Inc 1800 W Overland Rd (name) (address) Boise ID being first duly sworn upon (city) (state) oath, depose and say: I will personally post the subject property with the hearing notice sign one week prior to the public hearing for the (annexation, rezone, conditional use, and preliminary plat of Resolution Subdivision). Dated this day of (Signature) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. r`0Q��1�ER M�Q6 's l'UBLZG �'''•eT8 OF 19�� 0 10 1 WE d-pos t i ng w N il fvl,.�,-fo r I d a h o • •ir My Commission Expires:-J,-�7:2-1.� RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300' (AZ) LOCUST GROVE PROPERTIES LLC 1109 MAIN ST SUITE #500 BOISE ID 83702-0000 1545 S LOCUST GROVE RD CONTRACTORS EQUIP SUPLY CO INC 2000 E OVERLAND MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 PLAYGROUND INC 4098 N JULLION WAY BOISE ID 83704-2763 1780 E OVERLAND RD JE DOUBLE D LLC 4601 N FIVE MILE BOISE ID 83713-0000 1822 E OVERLAND RD OVERLAND 16 LLC 6223 N DISCOVERY WAY BOISE ID 83713-0000 E OVERLAND RD VOIGT GARY L AND GROVES C R & R L AND BASS ROBERT & DANA 1908 JENNIE LEE DR IDAHO FALLS ID 83404-6159 1965 E OVERLAND RD JOINT SCHOOL DIST #2 911 N MERIDIAN RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-2241 E OVERLAND RD CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LDS 50 E NORTH FLOOR 22ND SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150-0002 S LOCUST GROVE RD FARRELL ART V 32 W PROSPECTORS DR CASCADE ID 83611-0000 1695 S LOCUST GROVE RD CAMERON MICHAEL J & CAMERON TEENA L 1632 S LABRADOR PL MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 REDENBO NEWTON C & REDENBO CHRISTI L 1654 S LABRADOR PL MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 DROLLINGER KELLI A & DROLLINGER SCOTT 1670 S LABRADOR PL MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 REMKES KARL B & BREEZI 1700 S LABRADOR PL MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 VIERTEL EUGENE K & VIERTEL JEANNETTE L 1728 S LABRADOR PL MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 GEHRING JEFF D & GEHRING LAURIE H 1550 E PEACOCK ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 JOHNSON GREG B PO BOX 344 MERIDIAN ID 83680-0344 1572 E PEACOCK ST CONRAD GERALD L & CONRAD JOANNE C 2181 RIBIER DR MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 1594 E PEACOCK ST SPORTSMAN POINTE HOA PARK POINTE REALTY 6223 N DISCOVERY WAY SUITE #100 BOISE ID 83713-0000 S LOCUST GROVE RD MACKENZIE DON 1551 E PEACOCK ST MERIDIAN ID 83680-0000 BURKETT BOB F & BURKETT KATHERINE A 1573 E PEACOCK ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 NELSON STEVEN J & NELSON JANET L 1595 E PEACOCK ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 AUSTIN ROBERT D & TERESA A TRS AUSTIN R D & T A TRUSTEES 1834 S LABRADOR PL MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 ROBINSON JUSTIN & AMY B 1564 E PUFFIN CT MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 HINCKLEY N E & BUCHAK SUSAN C 1582 E PUFFIN CT MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 CARICO SCOTT & CARICO MELISSA L 1581 E PUFFIN CRT MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 PERRY RONALD R & DEANNA L 1886 S LABRADOR PL MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 PAFFUMI ROBERT D & PAFFUMI ANGELA R 1563 E PUFFIN CRT MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 COMPTON T NEAL & COMPTON SUSAN E 1574 E MASTIFF ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 JACKSON LARRY E & NASH JACKSON TONI L 1598 E MASTIFF ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 MOONEY CRAIG J & BAIRD LISA ANN 1575 E MASTIFF ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 KNOWLES TODD A & KNOWLES LISA O 1597 E MASTIFF ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 PARCEL PRIMOWNER / R7100270100 CONTRACTORS EQUIP SUPLY CO INC Z R7100270200 JE DOUBLE D LLC 3 R7100270300 PLAYGROUND INC 9 S1118449300 LOCUST GROVE PROPERTIES LLC S R8075810230 CAMERON MICHAEL J & CAMERON TEENA L lr R8075810240 REDENBO NEWTON C & REDENBO CHRISTI L I S1119110026 FARRELL ART V lr R8075810250 DROLLINGER KELLI A & DROLLINGER SCOTT `1 R8075810260 REMKES KARL B & BREEZI 10 51120212410 VOIGT GARY L AND GROVES C R & R L AND BASS ROBERT & DANA I1 R8075810270 VIERTEL EUGENE K & VIERTEL JEANNETTE L JZ R8075810280 GEHRING JEFF D & GEHRING LAURIE H 13 R8075810290 JOHNSON GREG B #4 R8075810300 CONRAD GERALD L & CONRAD JOANNE C 1; R8075810310 SPORTSMAN POINTE HOA i(. R8075810410 MACKENZIE DON i i R8075810420 BURKETT BOB F & BURKETT KATHERINE A 1X R8075810430 NELSON STEVEN J & NELSON JANET L 19 R8075810390 ROBINSON JUSTIN & AMY B at R8075810400 AUSTIN ROBERT D & TERESA A TRS AUSTIN R D & T A TRUSTEES dl R8075810380 HINCKLEY N E & BUCHAK SUSAN C 4,�R8075810320 SPORTSMAN POINTE HOA ,3R8075810370 CARICO SCOTT & CARICO MELISSA L QA R8075810350 PERRY RONALD R & DEANNA L ,aS R8075810360 PAFFUMI ROBERT D & PAFFUMI ANGELA R a,,,R8075810340 COMPTON T NEAL & COMPTON SUSAN E 4-) R8075810330 JACKSON LARRY E & NASH-JACKSON TONI L ,aa S1120223301 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LDS al S1120244300 JOINT SCHOOL DIST #2 3e, R8075810030 MOONEY CRAIG J & BAIRD LISA ANN dl R8075810020 KNOWLES TODD A & KNOWLES LISA O l4R8075810010 SPORTSMAN POINTE HOA ADDCONCAT 2000 E OVERLAND 4601 N FIVE MILE 4098 N JULLION WAY SUITE #500 1632 S LABRADOR PL 1654 S LABRADOR PL 32 W PROSPECTORS DR 1670 S LABRADOR PL 1700 S LABRADOR PL 1908 JENNIE LEE DR 1728 S LABRADOR PL 1550 E PEACOCK ST PO BOX 344 2181 RIBIER DR SUITE #100 1551 E PEACOCK ST 1573 E PEACOCK ST 1595 E PEACOCK ST 1564 E PUFFIN CT 1834 S LABRADOR PL 1582 E PUFFIN CT SUITE #100 1581 E PUFFIN CRT 1886 S LABRADOR PL 1563 E PUFFIN CRT 1574 E MASTIFF ST 1598 E MASTIFF ST 50 E NORTH FLOOR 22ND 911 N MERIDIAN RD 1575 E MASTIFF ST 1597 E MASTIFF ST SUITE #100 STATCONCAT MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 BOISE, ID 83713-0000 BOISE, ID 83704-2763 BOISE, ID 83702-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 CASCADE, ID 83611-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 IDAHO FALLS, ID 83404-6159 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83680-0344 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 BOISE, ID 83713-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83680-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 BOISE, ID 83713-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84150-0002 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-2241 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 BOISE, ID 83713-0000 Q 2 CW L O co �w U- in °Ma „p C N 2 � U 0 iZ 0 w U 4] 0 ®■®■IO■M■®■® V N T 0: m e -q a �y� Z C-) Cv 0 V J N Z (U7 a ate' e v C� a� ®■®■IO■M■®■® V N T 0: m e -q a �y� Z C-) Cv 0 V J N Z (U7 a FACT SHEET CEivl,, J U N - 6 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN Ice arena scheduled to be completed by the end of year 2000 and is described as `the largest hockey arena west of Salt Lake City, seating 1,400 + spectators Source: Meridian P&Z Commission Meeting, 3-22-2000 Proposed high school is slated to open Fall 2002 and designed to accomodate 1,800 students; generating potentially 3,000 or more vehicle trips per weekday Source: Meridian School District; Meridian P&Z Meeting, 3-22-00 Multi family/retaiUoffice development is designed to facilitate over 1, 500 vehicles, generating potentially 3,000 or more vehicle trips per day Source: blueprint shows approximately 1, 505 parking spaces Widening of Overland Rd. between Locust Grove and Eagle Rds not scheduled until 2005 Source: Traffic Services Division, Ada County Highway District Widening of Locust Grove Rd south of Overland Rd proposed for 2005 and beyond (5-20 years; not even on current ACHD Locust Grove Rd improvement project calendar) Source: Traffic Services Division, Ada County Highway District Traffic light installation at Locust Grove & Overland Rds not scheduled until 2004 at the earliest Source: Traffic Services Division, Ada County Highway District Approx. 3,100 vehicles utilize the Locust Grove10verland Rd intersection between 3 p. m. and 6 p. m. weekdays (3,137 vehicles counted Spm-6pm Thursday 3-23-00) dl e ht /�. RECEIVE J U N - 6 2000 TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF MERIDIAN Vehicles Entering/Exidng Intersection of Overland and Locust Grove Roads 3 p. m. to 6 p. in. 3-23-2000 3:00 -3:15 ...............219 3:15-3:30 ...............197 3:30-3:45 ...............229 3:45 - 4:00 ...............210 4:00 - 4:15 ............... 267 4:15-4:30 ...............230 4:30 - 4:45 ...............269 4:45- 5.00 ...............235 5:00- 5:15 ...............342 5.15-5.30 ............... 294 530-5.45 ...............338 5:45 - 6:00 ...............307 TOTAL .................. 3,137 We are not apposed to development; just to development Rr to widening of Overland and Locust Grove Roads. ...Irior to the beginning of heavy construction vehicles travelling the roads, tying up trafafic, or lane restrictions. We need to consider the need for emergency vehicles traversing Overland and Locust Grove Roads to access homes in the area, or accidents on Overland. It would be difficult, at best, as thereV is no place for traffice to pull over out of the way. We ask that Overland and Locust Grove not become another fiasco like the Curtis Road extension. We respectfully request that you consider the opinions of the 725 residents of Meridian who signed the petitions, as well as all of us who live near this development. We ask that the City Council of Meridian: Plan wisely, Plan Carefully,...Put the horse before the cart. .....Not wait until a mother and father are called by the Coroner to identify their child's body. Please take action to alleviate traffic and ped5trin roblems and potential hazards prior to approval of this project, which will create tWeswit blems. Thank you. LC/2� C„T uvrJ$ C v vnty� - l'`� urs ire-vv� b c u s°�' C r OU & 6,4,P-, J U N - 6 2000 My name is Marion Bertel. CITY OF MERIDIAN I live at 2534 S. Velvet Falls Way, Salmon Rapids Subdivision, Meridian, Id. 83642. IRS : -Z+k .Ms 9 fhit c ILr i^ �a c It t this time I would like to reiterate to the members of the City Council what my husband has stated to the Planning Commission at the last meeting. We have here 725 signatures from residents of the: Salmon Rapids Subdivision Raven Hill Subdivision Los Alamitos Subdivision Sportsman Pointe Subdivision Hunt's Bluff Subdivision and Meridian Greens Subdivision ....all respectfully asking the City Council to, at least delay the approval of the development proposed for the Locust Grove and Overland Road area until such time as Overland Road is widened to five lanes.(w Art. w b; V,5, e 0-` ) Those who have signed the petitions are frustrated over having to drive the already heavily -trafficked roads on a daily basis ... and agree with the Ada County Highway impact analysis that a development such as the one before the City Council tonight would only intensify and exacerbate an already existing major traffic problem. My husband parked at the intersection of Locust Grove and OvXerland Roads tion March 23 from 3:00 pm til 6:00 pm, and counted 3,137 vehicles using the intersection. This coincides with the ACHD's findings of 11,422 vehicle trips per day on Overland Road. Please bear in mind:this�s already existing traffic. During that three -hours period he also saw one rear -end accident and one near accident.. T c aGoident As the ACED pointed out in its report, the traffic on Overland Road and Locust Grove will easily double, and more likely triple, as a result of this development. We, as residents of the six existing subdivisions directly impacted by this development, and, a seventh subdivision which is just being developed, are especially concerned since: 1) It appears ACHD has no plans to widen Overland Road until 2004. 2) No plans to widen Locust Grove south of Overland until way beyond 2005 3) No plans to even install a traffic light at the intersection of Overland and Locust Grove Roads until 2004 or until "warranted." The developer hopes to start the major ice hockey and sports arena before the end of this year .... and the Meridian School District, pending bond approval, could open the new high school by the fall of 2002. Additionally office, retail and residential phases of the development will be completed probably well before 2005. I INTERSTP—, 84 ` I -L MERIDIAN CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY 500 0 C -G w.... N C -G I 1000 Feet 8 a� 8 1 1 LBLOCK 4 BLOCK 3 8 GAA STREET BLOCK 2 3 �JJ 2 5 4 BLOCK 1 SITE '5c 14 R-4 r � R1 , RT s R-4 ff� RT BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION REVISION BRIGGS PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20, T.3N., R. 1E., B.M., (208) 34¢9700 MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD SHEET t OF t BOISE. IDAHO 83705 DESIGN DRAFT SCALE DATE BKB 1•• = WG. NO, 500 D 02/01/00 0101 10101 APR RT i-+ �— i-+ I-- F-+ �-- �,O W J CN (A • 6 W N C. C C WG V146W N ►-+ O fD p d "O "� CA ;..a. � �rAOW te a r ob � i o o �' EEL - ; O on arq sv eD L� fS rA DO a Q D" O Oq Pill `C � � Qr � C � p., oma•+ A D eD =' n 0 rOD F4 C ow o' �. pec � mo WW - X co C. p 'T �. Ul CDTQ car C a TQ F5 c � o o 44 N a fD fD co m �- fD a p p " a CDm tZ. 01 51 @..I, CL '�'`� C 1I G.. C Z 1 C" N O O O 0 O C O (IQ ? rA �C}� O G • A r. V1 ~i On.I•= A CD b.l. �• ■•1. ■r. CO... A �= et fD to A t ^ A JI O fD rAA! re (jQ �' �D D OD TQ �C e 3- C fD A rA rA o .. ZA QM 2. ��' `� rD rD C C• "� >Z.,rA O D C g (IQ o' C arcft , c(' a' i D JJ eD y Cry O La��c°rr•°e�� a QM C C A QrQ t) � ID IrQ cr o04 QQn o ? y A A " crC.Cr� fD OC c CL UQ =' C C CL 0 s y y — *- i-+ r-+ r — �-O W -1 a1 (A A W N �- to A W N 0-4 O /\ S L S y y • a r+ < c � � A r� eD A r, r. A r• O ra C t VAiUQft T "C m A r S A r• QTQ 0% CD y�yy f D co CDeD QM go fD fD eD eD � to a y RDI' eD N A A O < r.Cr EA 0Y �D �h ;a��a�a�• ebfD �"aca c... QTQ .� A (IQ ► G 0. �� Vit, S A= O :T O eDD ° :2:3 � a r < 'nrA mz fD fDD2 M fD rA C a o a �o s y y n, 4 sp y O r W" H.+ to A w Mc"occ-,jC7,cn'�wN�� C"� �.oTs o eD M f •( r. r • fD r7 UIQCD A O pq, • v eD to �� fD to �.y VI w fD f eD /"r rr eD w Q 7Q A C fD p a+ O �h 7- tjD eD C J G MeD C CA eD � O d r. rA n A ft ".� ►� CD �h ... v r C ""• CD f�mo�a��. ID 'D QM QM ar J 1,7" n A V on fD a+• A� �• "! fD m 4N, � U �. m (A eD V? cL cr �► CL e c Iqu SP y 0 y O — w" *-+ �-+ w. •-• ',Q W J C1 to 4�6 W N to A W N ►-+ O (*-' " �-a LJ CD c= O � rD p CD c= O � w 'L3 A O a, v1 A � A ii F.w QQ ara w p _ rte.. 0. rA NCL d CL IQ 0 x "s fD (IQ CL �Q A fS CD a, O M A a T rA�_;�� r• rr =. a� o ` WCL i CL y � CL A " ,.y O y 0 GIQ A ~now. � fC � M OQ t�D O A O n• a; a+ 0q• CL rA�D CD r. o oCD n CD rA QTQ CD aawoara Mo PIN 0 f�DA `•� M a• A Z. 0 ara o a a fp O ►h �. C� a r O � � � � � fid � O• ~• p„p I'D a � -D, N (IQ o CD o �' �. LAo o .. x (Fa• fD n. 0mr a CD ft A y 0 v .I C C A7 � A ty n "I � A A7 � 0Q *I 'L� fD tD A A O rs• '_'• �. �. (IQ � IQ TQ sy f CL -, a. �. cr ft o � � OO A � �• b A Cr ra A � cC `C C• Cr O. C OUQ C0ra CD •e C rD 0 0 � A;'�.�� f � fD CrQ w w�'h � � A O s y y s y y 00 00 0 w A eD A• d �3 ...��.et fD d O m fD rD -1 m d A� m ►.rft�. d `s O m ft � • ft04. O O (IQcC ft d CL p O rD OF C frD = ►�.� Q' p ... ft A � C � f7 O fD row CL P* n fD -% a o y R " IrD UQ A� M. "DI, %� A� fD OD CL fD A a" "a -i Z 35 O CL O "5 fD `C 4z so < O O O ..j A� �• A� y 77 O 0. � (4. A 'C ~ fD 1 fD rD Sy ACrQ ri "p""+ O � 7. O "L3 O A� O rn � r•r � R � C. p M cr CD y fD O "3 rp a A� < r3 rrjl' CD A "! n A = C O �D A ►{. O O �. fD r� G "' • rD A O y J O fD f�D 00 a+ % G. C. A a OfD A A d IQ to ra tZ. 0. CL O eD a � c y O 00 J C1 to A W cq i nlj N y O ,..r C O e � � �Q = C O" TQ A O QQep • r. yeDrD rr, IQ ftC o r eD IQ rD o, fD a o o M CL M fD IQ y. eD r° o CL ft a eD cr � h � y a. � r D'a�c� fD o �• eD.�Q0 o r. A O Wt O �. Rs C `� d d � h n C � ►=• Qri fD eD h vl v� fD �• ... 0 y O !-+ p..i �+ M-+ �+ �-+ \D 00 J O� (JI � W N F-+ ►a n <'r tiff 77 ��..!! V1 •A W N p O O¢ a C � � `Y � C eE UQ• C fD CD �4CL 7� L-' As eD n O G Tri CD fD o 35 it ft C— n As C � � �* C �•� l O a¢ 0 OO oro zi fD ft Io! xo ft '� �• fD fD fD fD fD tz fD fD ✓ � � � n � G � "C± � O �s r' S (!� N `t' vs �• w fD C O p fD C '3vel C) ¢ �' �-* , 1.= �. tD .+ CD w ILA fD fD FACDft eD fD '� m c � =w &M M CQ< eD - fDfD.... rD fD O ~ fD H G-� 0"i��+.��--►�� A.nW00 A -P, a � El m `C ft G D S r fb C c t�D =D"a ~p C bC s o fD OD ft rDft a n arc' cc U� o rs e b ¢ �. M CD �. �e a J � Ji �► � �� , mss; ,� a ,� � �. CD A A C� "� ('p tD CD A fD O A7 fD v� ?D r CD y 2 / wl IrD � ^ D " ft y y 5 uaa w°'� R � ti .b F �"IM ��c e m CL c mr "R M' fD Cr O Op C R• � R "n b Cr NeD r D o wl N� v� CD C O n �' p p: Q' o �. ft o R i o 0 0 T 41 ow R 04 ow CL . Cr aCD ID C O � ►l 7Q O ►I A rA t04�D C CCA •� o C n Qr gr core) 0o".Rra� O R .. v� ►+� .. `< 06eD A� R wl R R• C+ , "C mw. C. C. ,... w% R �.. O C,+ M S � fD � A� rn t=. >✓ a ,� � fD O R•' Q+ n' C eD IIryIIZX a� r s moi/ 'Q on R lyyY f�D V fD O O 0Q w IQ p„ ar o o O aria A r fo R A ark AMR �. c IQCD n � o CD cr p��. fD a cr fD �o fD R p O fD � �, o y• O n' D 00 R y fD 00 eD R. v� C ' A7 �• fD "�� o id m �, oa fD 0 a C y O O fD R C C 'Z:S fD CD as aQ fo e ty CD m c a �. fD p � �.. � R• UQ fD n fD c fD pr a �e r m O CD R a C" mw. CL ara r� A �- �, ... (IQ C n M CD a �• TQ fD fD ►t Wl oe CL O CL fD a a a o oIrD G. R C3 p Gr .CrQf. OfAD P CCD M O "O R �R.►. fD A C eD ^ r A � A tIl i"'! �• tiff' d' Do fD "IfD C CL CD tv A fD Ci. fD fDfD ,.! fD C fD C y O fh � W N �~+ O � OO �1 01 t!� � W N �+ "C t7 C3�" O A� "MS•' G,. �' Gi CD CD CD CD �C C j o (IQ CD �Q C.m ID `,• � C a R+ O O C� 0Q ri J % Cr A C "� ft,off, m �'� Zr cs 19 a, a N411 14"r (�eDa ara c c a Gr t<D omA A je C W -i Q Wt W Wt CD Q �• i�r � o.. Cr `< o \ CD u�1 kT r v� ~ W N ��.► oo J C-, CA .n W N n i Qra \ W . r :zv v eC �„ 6Qm O fD � ! N �• n d� n C R ri GTQ TQ lit Z- l 1e CD U ml G 39 OOki T: C ow fD s /rkafl-�� ts 0 Z Ig rr M ° = °r LA ow OrQ Cs eD rp S rA TQ CL CD enD a m n v ^ .r arca fD y O f4 a v, R �1 ul `` *�+ < cr .0 tD eb ff7AD et A D ZA no 5 IQ fD IQ n n a C m mr a s a.�e- Cr PC 0 0 mom°'CL 13 tz om A A oMo A - F7+ o v :4 Mr 7d m, < • CL 0 cr cr cr o 0 A ;< eD C6 r O o G. CL Qq� Cao D A ... I -a arc m° m 0to 46— A a m o a, A sp ll� TQ rA A u� Q26m'°G "w'M �a r r.r a pp iP Q„ � A f1D fD O K 7 C uo i7 AD fD dQ CL �a f�CmmD;m�9eb m fD ft D fD D G. r' ,•� v°M'°"TQn�.° D ® D � D Ctea � �. �'► O Q °Q m n o `� Q O pre �b rA fo C C� C CL fp CL °cr p fD fD A �• Vl r.. pD FD "! p O CL pCLq OC Ofo so fo A �' O � � �: O 0 p C � c � 1.0 11 AA fD �• �y m Q IfD < M to �• A A A a A A A � C � A ,•� ?� � OpQ "1 p• fD y O v��-,wN*"o`coo�cTcn�wn�►-�►r� D D w m m O Cr a. @ �' �c fD O �... a �• QM UQ A ow C ?D fD IN ow on M s ►�.� C O A Q' < � "O CL ow ra tD a, o < r~�..r O. N' Qr r N D r� a+ ►py ►o �. QTQ U rA Po ^ a rA FA csa- O= 7 VI � W W *-+ p r n � n �ox-IO � �� *"' O-+ F- & 0-& �-► 0" ',p W -4 ON VI 40. W N �+ V1 .P W N o+ O y y 0', *" M-+ r-+ �O 00 J O\ V1 W N V1 .p W i--� b A A7 R oo o ? a C. C o CL ft 'C fD ft O < � '�. .�~.•+ ice. eD CD c iv n A A �ft m A � ~• tD ►"� � tD ` v1 �Q O A y O na g m r � e CL J� a � � a J � O � a d� C� 9 � CL � a ft ►*� �CS w• UQ �p a o � K 10� a� a.o p��•0�� fD � gr Ow � r c°rar°•0 ��ar@c° is "Ilk � 8 ar Q � O Mo. W M aQTQ a: �AoC' rA C b rA P 'Z! 1�! Wt EAA• A � A tz y O 46 46 W W ►-► �+ �p 00 -4Mr O D �w CL • .1 m��earae�� tD re D'a�,� ►bC� fD �ft a c �• ' " A . to D ft o �•_ 1� n 0 IQ a� O N O� a O O O ��• � tD IQ A ^ o "`C A O �• ��, 0 A Woo A a D• wo mw. / v w GIQ th 0"'M--► i-+ �-► '-Zp OC �1 a*,V1 A W W N IQ y a A "ti r.L Mir - mW o d or aa"Ca�I 0 � N C• taD a A trAw CL D rep CL n A m a A a �* fD 0 w "Ao � CL CD eD 00 p a . CLrA CL aro c x cr CL m OW a r.L CL — = 1�� a� -' �. A CEJ \ (tN- b O D: Q n °eD "! r rA 70 A M 1 R n A m wd. wM rA co fD CD rAbaa Y y O ter * O -A C- -' �- -4 CIA AA 46 � c a Q� b � J � �C feD p rC►. �. d D. �. �� O d d C " r* fD 0 ara C. A is �► rD tD 0 0„ b Wl or fD ft rr C. ee I.. pa•maro nom•° x ., Q A o C W -. MI`� A tC C PC o A 0 � Lr � � o � B . eD eD o treD 00 m to 0— w CL C r° 0 ' +. 3 AD M 95 0 o Cr ACL arc' o° ° d. fD d+ own ��* rAn Cr m 'C r Wt c" ° y C CDA•�`��fD rA JE C.12 (IQ A fD CSrArAD wl m fD y O Y J CrN to 4�6 w N ►-.► G A-.1, O 0 W= !* 11 11 -4 r 1 I `ate'.,,�• 0 R. TQ Craw 0 n R p g' d to cr Is ts ts o' A • ow Q o. is 'b a. IqEA o ►o ow A� � O 5. a' 0 L � w O Ow a a IQ ow 0 a n 0 NN. e a ►*� Pa a 'ti pre o O' w 0 �n ow . A9 aww.ow CD w,• P+ rA LA •P W N � O QM grgr V) aae r+R � o � o � rk 0 QM *1 O cr co ow e C) •�`�. 'A o ow Cri to�� a�, A �•�,a a� fi -�� AG��DD Wi "I CL v. � t/ CD QM y O 0-` 0-1 -i ON to 4�6 W N � to A W N O -A O _ ozsp y O ate°ow o CL CD � ol 4. `� O C A �0�., C� �• fD Mw N CL fD o o ow O &00 a� m�•� CL QTQ A v• '� rj• faD r o /� '� � to G� o co • * Md. ►a C+ c. c �. pad a� 0 C+fD o n• UQ rr � r 0 :r fD MnCL fD � &OD � � �•ara ozsp y O 10 VA 44, W N *- p M J W N i--� C. C =1 Q 0 e fD c � b � fD O � �. 0 35 IQ rA A� �Q TQ ¢ O O• O r.r O ti CLa� w '0 O ►% CL rD eD y g sv f° ft Cr • o aacc'� eD (IQ CrQ ow ow ara =w o, �`J1 "�% �• A� ft "1 0 O w W CL =W fD ow ow �* C . � Ow C Qw M C O mw; A7 00 n Q. b b C (IQ i� C � A� ""• fp rn.. � IQ o "cww t C a n C. rA y �y F-+ i-.+ r--► 0- r—+ 0.- V1 W W �+ O 0 z c t �j J i 41 / _ � � C eD D ai fD n O fD ft arCD `< fDUq' C p co D D ID p' A CD �IQ eD a p f<D A X17 ft CO 5 CDDra�e��, eD o a, M fD a ri1• O ft tD D ar DfD c FC fD "I CD "A's rA � A a D• f�D � � � fD � � � J - &M fDft p, G. wl D "C 't n A 20 IQ ACD fD rr fD z O '� �' t!� to D O Oq i � � C eD D ai fD n O fD ft arCD `< fDUq' C p co D D ID p' A CD �IQ eD a p f<D A X17 ft CO 5 CDDra�e��, eD o a, M fD a ri1• O ft tD D ar DfD c FC fD "I CD "A's rA � A a D• f�D � � � fD � � � J - &M fDft p, G. wl D "C 't n A 20 IQ ACD fD rr fD z O '� �' t!� to D O Oq I� O IQ CD �C �* �G WAra n �• v'. � �' �• UQ "r `7• fD A7 (iQ -,I-t is f A A� ►� � r'h � � QDa' J O fD �r rr T ? � TV p �• a o s� yy j , � � Q„ A �A,', �O• ray. � aa,p'"a,eD °n o4 ep "I-- a, �. a, ►*� 7c C y m CA Is - V' �o O ►r3 r R" � A� A .. `•01 A A 'r mO LU A7CL QQ r• �4 OQ Om O' tib s � A CD Im ^ � � 1 0% fD eD r QQ r.. I� � � � � � I-► � co a � cn � w N �-► VI •P. W N � O c-. L vl�,Tk b r rs 1 - R, Cti kA CL TD ✓' � � tY' (rte '� r. � r ara ow A � O AD �r a 4 CD C �C IQ �p f D 119 m I nom' O CD = = p c CD csw cODas aeeafDmm tet O Rdq' `W A = 't A �q IQ � a p CeD A m C Q rA a �. CD CD fD ►*a ?D y n C ro d A• o� �.. o��ao�oa eD .eDrr y' GCC CRC A7 �fD s ml PC a.°ra.� �' �.c r: m :TOS �.ac 4�_O Q�QCD Ai �. rA 55 CSD 0 a CL IQ mr 39 f no A• C A �+ A C O CCD C 'A arq CD � C r+. CD A A CC A d �• �' �TA W CLCD eD Q+ 0 vl�,Tk ara ow A � O AD �r a 4 CD C �C IQ �p f D 119 m I nom' O CD = = p c CD csw cODas aeeafDmm tet O Rdq' `W A = 't A �q IQ � a p CeD A m C Q rA a �. CD CD fD ►*a ?D y n C ro d A• o� �.. o��ao�oa eD .eDrr y' GCC CRC A7 �fD s ml PC a.°ra.� �' �.c r: m :TOS �.ac 4�_O Q�QCD Ai �. rA 55 CSD 0 a CL IQ mr 39 f no A• C A �+ A C O CCD C 'A arq CD � C r+. CD A A CC A d �• �' �TA W CLCD eD Q+ 0 U1 W- W N N O O C a iz so y O O OCL D a. m c 'I ft arDQ '�' d C ,fit n � A� D tti �• Oyy m w eD G. O rD py py . n D✓ ft CL ft D `C• RDQ O *1n O C ara f D *I a. Q' f° �. c f' c �IQ D n f� a D m CDA C fD " p ml ft f nom,,. �' �'• A� �h ry ftCL nC CD iz so y O �-► �► ►-• �o 00 J 01 (A A W N �-► a r C C n =0-0 mmpo w I n f D C G < F I.- A o �. fD L p• rA a IQ ow d a CID OIm�, ►b rA � f, f D m �. ow ow c o pr N CO a O � o � CD W rA o a CDC CD eD �•c�"Cr �� a � as R' p„ � � �• CL ow 0 ^w <AfD � ow c a Cr r. -.IQ c �. �1 0:n cs n p o rD fD fD IQ FD �i o o= o M o fD eD to CD ow M A crEA �• � ►� rAIQ n n ow c y O c Z v� N O O O CA 46 W N 0-► C t�D r f<D � ►� "C O � aQ� N aa(ra t�D r f<D � ►� "C O � aQ� aa(ra O W TQ is CO '� ►� co v' aro � �, Da,`��' C Q° �D cr C) ' y O M— P.— r-+ r+ r- 'Sp -\ r y azsp y O 0-+ *+ U 4;,6 QA 2' E ID aI=[Z. ImII'AII y O y O 5 y O �l I S y O �-+ 46 W �-+ �-+ i-+ �G 00 -I O� VI W N C C b "L3 O ren (!� � W N r-+ p fi �f � � �� tee° � � �•� c�a ft law �D 71 bQM ►� rp.a R 010 J AD �' r•l ° O �• fit ov CD con fb im fD fS ° o a r* 00 .� ; w p; Tl ov rA fD to op cr M% �W 4IrA a �o y O V1 -;�, W N O r y O mm r�O M ' � arc eD ►� eD CD eD A A "! 0.- W, n pr a Oq `O a �. ... fD aa,kT0 CD p rD A,•�„� CD a C A D r � a� = fD �, o o � a a g o �• fD o. a � o fD sv v, fD QM N y O June 2, 2000 AZ 00-004 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 6, 2000 APPLICANT G.L. Voigt / Overland, LLC ITEM NO. REQUEST Annexatio nand zoning of 16.119 acres from R -T to C -G for proposed Resolution Business Park - south of Overland Road and east of Locust Grove Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS See attached PZ minutes See attached recommendations Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING --MAY 9 2000 The regular scheduled meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission was call to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Keith Borup. MEMBERS PRESENT: Keith Borup, Sally Norton, Kent Brown, Tom Barbeiro, Richard Hatcher. OTHERS PRESENT: David Swartley, Bruce Freckleton, Brad Hawkins Clark, Will Berg. Borup: We'd like to call to order our meeting this evening. This is a regular scheduled meeting for Planning and Zoning Commission. I'd like to go through attendance of the Commissioner's. First item on the agenda is the Consent Agenda. I would entertain a motion for approval of the Consent Agenda. Brown: Mr. Chairman I would move approval of the Consent Agenda, Items A,B and C, minutes from the March 22nd, April 3rd and April 11th meetings. Hatcher: I second the motion. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Brown: I would 'like to be excused for the first 7 items. Borup: Okay. Have fun. Item number 1 and 2 were tabled. I believe we tabled those items wanting to finalize Items 3 through 6. Would we like to skip to Items 3 through 6 and come back or would the Commissioner's like to open and vote on 1 and 2 right now. 3. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF 17 LOTS ON 107.06 ACRES IN PROPOSED L-0 AND C -G ZONES FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC—OVERLAND AND LOCUST GROVE ROADS: Borup: Does staff have any additional comments to make on this. It was continued for the ACHD report. We had the draft report a while back. We have the final report now. Is the applicant here and like to come forward. Do any of the Commissioner's have anything additional they'd like to ask the applicant, other than the ACHD report. Bowcutt: These items were deferred because we were awaiting Ada County Highway District Staff Report as you recall at our public hearing a month or so ago. We had not even received a draft. The staff, I think they went through about 3 versions of the draft and it did go to the highway district Commissioner's last Wednesday at their noon meeting for discussion. To bring you up to date the Commissioner's did recommend Meridian Planning ancr`)ning Commission r May 9, 2000 Page 2 approval of all the projects involved. They instructed their staff to get with us and the City of Meridian and the school district and see what can be done to exhilarate the upgrade of Overland Road between Locust Grove and Eagle Road. At this point of time, it is on their 2004 plan. They realize that they could have an operational high school as early as 2002. That did concern them. They have also required multiple improvements of my client, which includes constructing a 3 I lane from the east end of our property up to the intersection of Locust Grove and then south on Locust Grove to our southerly boundary. On of the comments that was made by the Commission, that type of improvement can run anywhere from $125 to $175 thousand dollars. If we go in and we construct that P lane and then they come in 6, 12, 18 months later and tear it all out to build their five lane, it makes more sense that we exhilarate the 5 lane and put those monies to use building or helping to construct the 5 lane. Therefore, it would save some public funds. The things that I want to bring to your attention that they placed upon this project, they have asked us to contribute 25% of a signal at the intersection of Locust Grove and Overland. The intersection operates at a level of service A at this time, however, the left hand turn lane operates at a level of service F. According to ACHD's traffic counts the counts at this time do not warrant signalization. In the future they realize they will need a signal there. They understand that the retail that we propose at that corner is down the road is not one of the first 3 or 4 phases that is going to be further down the road then that. Probably co-insiding with some type of a Locust Grove overpass. They accept the fact that a light is necessary, but state they will construct that light when it is warranted. Secondly, they have asked us to contribute $112,500 which would be 75% of the light at our new Millenium Way Overland intersection which is the collector roadway for the high school. That 75% does include the high school or the school district share. My conversations with the school district, they have indicated that they will pay whatever proportionate share the highway district deems is attributed to their traffic volume. There is approximately 5000 trips a day through Millenium Way. Of those 5,000, 3,000 will be from going to and from the high school site. They've asked us to contribute $52,800 dollars to a trust fund for sidewalk along Overland Road. We asked them to allow us to construct the sidewalk versus trust funding for it. The policy of the City of Meridian is they would like to see those sidewalks go in as soon as possible. Their concern was if we placed the sidewalk in at the edge of the new right of way that it could be torn out when the road is rebuilt. Our suggestion was we'll take the sidewalk and meander within our 30 foot landscaped area. Therefore, we will be outside the right of way and would not require any modification. The Commission seemed to believe that's a viable option. They asked staff to get with us and discuss it. We will be building decel lanes at the intersection. They ok'ed all of our approaches on Overland Road. They asked us to upgrade our collector. We shoed a 41 foot collector roadway section for Millenium Way. They indicated they'd like that to be 46 foot section. My client agreed to that. They asked us to provide adequate stacking room for any of the approaches as they intercept with Millenium Way. The only major revision was on Locust Grove. We have this approach right here. They have asked us to move this to offset it from this roadway here to Meridian Planning ar"_"oning Commission .�. May 9, 2000 Page 3 increase that distance of offset. We will shift this building this direction and then shift this to the south and then put parking in there. Our offsets from all of the major intersections for the signal will be installed in the future are acceptable. This was the only thing of significance. This is a multi phased project and the highway district commission liked this—the idea of a long term project. The first phase will be the ice hockey facility. The second phase would consist of 140 units of the total 200 apartments, 2001. The seminary will go in whatever time the high school goes in. All of this is down the road. Your staff placed a limitation on the conditional use permit for the apartments -40 units in the first phase. I brought that up with Ada County Highway District and they said that doesn't make any sense. That is one of the lowest traffic generators on the site. Also, you can't afford to pay all of these trust funds and make all the improvements if you can't begin the projects. 40 units is not acceptable. My clients indicate they can not function with 40 units. Ada County Highway District did look at impact fees generated by this project. The school district is exempt from impact fees but all of the uses on the property would be subject. The multi family project would pay $160,000 in impact fees. The retail space would generate over one million dollars. That brings you up to date. Barbeiro: Becky is Millenium Drive to be placed as part of the first phase Bowcutt: Yes sir. The first phase we are c nstructing all of the public roadway systems. We'll built Millenium Way and put all the sewer, water, 3 phase power and then build this public street here, the rotary and this public street here. We have all ready designed all of those roadways. Barbeiro: Can you remind me of what kind of meetings you've had with the school district in regards to Millenium Drive, the students that will use that and the roadway being the primary road for all of the construction at the high school. Bowcutt: They will be coming up and down that roadway. It will have to be there before they can pull their permit. The highway district has indicated they want to focus all of the high school traffic where that signal is going to be constructed. Barbeiro: As I recall, the conditional use permit for the high school won't be available until the signal is operational. Bowcutt: According to your planning staff the high school does not require a conditional use permit in their R-4 zone. They will just be submitting for building permit. That is why the highway district imposed the 75% of that light—the $112,000 because they would not see that school application come through. All of my users will be conditional use applications. That was the other thing that they liked. Norton: According to the Ada County Highway District we received the draft report and then the final report sometime today. The difference between the two is that instead of Meridian Planning ar mooning Commission" May 9, 2000 Page 4 paying the $52,000 for the sidewalk on Overland, you will put in the sidewalk in your landscape area. Is that correct? Bowcutt: That's what we requested. Norton: You started to talk about not doing the center lane improvement on Overland in order for Overland to be widened to 5 lanes earlier. Would you go through what you said on that. Bowcutt: In the staff report approved by the Commission it mandates that we construct a 3`d center turn lane for the entire length of our property. It would be from our perimeter to the intersection and then down to our southern boundary here. Three lane on Overland and Locust Grove. Norton: How close is your far east property to Eagle Road? Bowcutt: This is one half mile. In our staff report we are required to construct that. The issue we brought up with the commission is we would like to see the improvements accelerated. We don't want to see the third lane wasted. The elevations will all change. Norton: Did you get any idea how far up the priority list it was going to be moved? Bowcutt: The staff and I had at least four discussions. They indicated that their superiors would not make a decision. We would have to take our plea to the commission and that is what we did. They instructed their staff, you need to figure out a solution and now. With that school coming in 2002, 1 would anticipate them trying to accelerate it two years—If I had to guess. Norton: Are you under the understanding that that road will be five lanes by the time school goes in 2002. Bowcutt: That is what I hope and I think the commission wants their staff to figure out how to do that. Borup: At this point, something could be worked out that's the way to go. If it can't be worked out then the 3 lanes are going in. Bowcutt: We will end up building the third lane. Those requirements are set down. I did forget to mention, they are going to add additional turn lanes at the Eagle Road Overland intersection and that work should begin in a few months and they indicated they are going to get started on the Meridian Road Overland intersection for that improvement. Borup: Before we proceed I'd like a show of hands how many people are here to testify on this application. We have received public testimony over the last three months so Meridian Planning an " 'oning Commission ~ May 9, 2000 Page 5 what we'd be open for is anything pertaining to the ACHD report we will be glad to take any testimony on. Bertell: Steve Bertell. I live at 2535 S. Velvet Falls Way. Mr. chairman and members of the commission, at this time I would like to present to the board a total of 725 signatures from residents from all the impacted Subdivisions, all respectfully asking the commission to at least delay the approval of this development until such a time as Overland and Locust Grove Roads are widened. Those who have signed the petitions are frustrated over having to drive in all ready heavily trafficked roadway on a daily basis. We agree with the ACHD impact analysis statement that the findings of the development would only intensify the all ready major traffic problems in this area. In fact, I parked at the intersection of Overland and Locust Grove the afternoon of March 23rd from 3 PM until 6 PM and I counted 3137 vehicles using that intersection, either crossing or turning from one street to another. This coincides with the ACHD report findings of approximately 11,422 vehicles using Overland Road on a daily basis. This is existing traffic. Also, during that 3 hour period, I witnessed one rear ender accident, one near accident and my wife and I came upon another accident on Overland Road on April 10th at 5:50 PM. The traffic on these roads will easily double if not triple as a result of this development. The Ada County Highway District has no plans to widen Overland until 2004 since it is in their 5 year plan. No plans to widen Locust Grove south of Overland until sometime outside the 2005 year plan. No plans to install a traffic light there until it is warranted. I don't know what the definition of warranted is. The developer stated they wanted to start the major ice hockey and sports arena this year pending bond approval. The high school could open as early as fall 2002. Don't misunderstand us. We are not opposed to this development, but what we are saying is that we are requesting that Overland and Locust Grove be widened to accommodate the dramatic traffic increase that this proposal would create. If there is a traffic mishap on the freeway, Overland Road immediately backs up. If emergency vehicle needed to get to one of our Subdivisions, it would be difficult at best for that vehicle to get through. Let's not make Overland and Locust Grove roads another fiasco like the Curtis Road extension was. At least consider the opinions of the 725 residents as well as all of us who live in the 6 impacted Subdivisions. Borup: You feel that the road would be improved on a faster time frame without the million dollars that this project would contribute toward the roads. Bertell: I am a lay man and don't know where the money would come from. We are concerned about— Borup: We are lay men too (Inaudible) and it is not going to come from anywhere other than this type of thing. So, the fastest way to get Overland approved, is to get the money. Since this has been carrying on for several months, we had quite a number of staff recommendations on this project. Do we need a refresher on that. We know staff's recommendation is. I am thinking I mean the applicant either agrees with them or —she mentioned one in her report, so I think I'd like to get Becky back up. You had Meridian Planning an,"7oning Commission ^ May 9, 2000 Page 6 mentioned one item as far as staff recommendation on number of apartment units. We've got your response to all of staff comments. That was the only one that stuck out. Were there any others? That was under the CUP, Item number 2 on your response. Bowcutt: The annexation and zoning application, we were in agreement. preliminary plat, I highlighted item 8. The applicant intends to provide landscape easements along Locust Grove and Overland Roads. An association will be formed to govern perimeter landscaping. We ask that that be an easement. I believe that staff had a discussion about it being a separate lot. Borup: Staff's concern was who will maintain it. Bowcutt: At a minimum the landscape buffer shall be placed within a permanent landscape easement designated such on the plat. We would like that to be designated as an easement on the plat and provide an association for maintenance. Item 8, preliminary plat requirements. Item 10, we agreed to pipe the Hunter Lateral as requested by staff. We ask that we be allowed to provide a western fence along the western side of the apartments. Staff made a statement they prefer that it be unfenced if we pipe the lateral. Clarification on Item 13. We have a little access road. It was not intended to be a private drive. It is an access way providing joint access to those buildings. We just want to clarify that our intention was not to construct curb gutter or sidewalk there because it is an alley access. Under the PUD, I highlighted Item 4. We did not provide any RV storage, parking areas for the multi family. Those uses will be prohibited. Only personal cars will be allowed. We do not propose a maintenance building at this site. All maintenance will be contracted out with a maintenance company. We disagreed on Item 7 concerning the parking requirements. Staff asked for 2.3 spaces per dwelling unit. The ordinance mandates 2. 1 know of no multi family application where staff imposed 2.3. 1 went to another complex that has garages called the Renascence next to Chinden and Eagle Road. We did that civil engineering for that site. That one has garages and I noticed that people who have two cars but have a single garage, their spouse parked in front of the garage. I think what staffs intention for additional parking was for guests or something like that. Our contention is, it is not necessary with our type of design we have more than what we would ever need in parking. For the Ice Rink, I think there was a difference of eight spaces. Mr. McKeegan got up to discuss that stating that we have substantial amount of overflow parking to the north and there will be very few events where you would find that all parking spaces would be completely utilized. His contention was that adequate parking was provided. Obviously we were opposed to the limitation—it was the limitation of 30 units in the first phase of the apartments. We had asked for the first phase to consist of 140. For the record and for those people in the audience that were not here at the last hearing, we are asking for conceptual approval of this planned unit development, but we are only asking for site specific approval for the ice arena and the 200 unit apartments. All the other users with the exception of the high school will have to come back before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. All surrounding properties within 300 feet will be notified. Legal notice will be put in the paper. Each user will have Meridian Planning ane"`oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 7 to come back before this body and go through this process again. That is one factor that should be taken into consideration as far as what improvements are done out on these roadway systems when the timing of these lights and so forth. If a user comes in say a year and a half from now, and he will generate a substantial amount of traffic, at that point of time if those improvements aren't out there to support that development, I would anticipate commission having a difficult time of proving it. We've got to start somewhere and we've got to get that collector roadway and this other network of roadways and utilities to provide access to the high school. The only way we can afford to do it is to take these first couple phases and move forward. Borup: Thank you. Any questions from the commission? Barbeiro: We can ask staff questions as a whole or individually. The one that catches my eye right now is the storage areas because that is a city ordinance. Other then that, if you wanted to go down the line with some of the things that Becky disagreed with. Hawkins Clark: Commissioner Barbeiro, members of the Commission the ordinance requirement for storage areas has typically been something that if the developer makes a commitment we have waived at this level. It is not necessarily required a variance. It really particularly when garages are provided. It is something we look favorable at. Borup: At this particular site there is a proposed mini storage unit down the street. Barbeiro: How about the maintenance building. Hawkins Clark: I think when the covenants, correct me Becky if they are not, but typically we —they are going to contract out. That is not ordinance required. I think it is a recommendation. We are fine with that. On the parking issue mainly we were pointing out that the fact that on Valeri Heights no tandem parking was allowed. If your going to allow it here, we just mainly wanted to raise the attention. We certainly aren't looking for more asphalt. I think we concur with the 460 number for required parking. The cross access issue was important. Obviously we'd ask for a revised preliminary plat that shows that, that shows the new Locust Grove Driveways to be submitted for the City Council—prior to the City Council so we can review the revised preliminary plat that reflects these changes. Barbeiro: Becky, in our last meeting, you did tell us that you were going to have a cross access over the Hunter Lateral, is that correct. Bowcutt: Yes, I think our sketched out we were going to make an inter connection between those two buildings and just north of the daycare facility into that little rotary. We make on making that revision and getting that to staff prior to the City Council. Meridian Planning an'%"oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 8 Barbeiro: Brad the recommendation regarding landscape buffers. 25 versus 30 and staff would prefer to have a separate lot where the developer would prefer to have an easement. Comment on that please. Hawkins Clark: This issue comes up frequently. It is mainly our concern is the consistency of appearance for principle arterials like what Overland is going to be. I think in this case with the easement going to be maintained the full buffer distance by a single entity, that's fine. Our main issue is when you have single, multiple single lots that all have a easement, each of them can take care of that landscape however they want. Barbeiro: Becky, the property will remain under one ownership, is that correct. Bowcutt: No sir. When you plat it then it would be eligible to sell off the lots to separate owners. What we propose to do is place landscape easements on the plat and then we will have to have covenants, obviously governing the uses on these lots and so forth. On these covenants it would stipulate like lot owner dues. They would not be homeowners association dues, but lot owner dues which would provide for the maintenance of all of the landscaping. It is all maintained the same. We are going to provide a landscape plan so all of it would be the same. You would not end up with a hodge podge. That is not our intention. Barbeiro: Your new plan will account for 7 handicapped spots at the arena. Bowcutt: Yes sir. Mr. McKeegan when on the record last time that they would add those. Barbeiro: Brad, when we talked about the 30 dwelling units for the apartments, Becky's note was that ACHD thought that the apartments would be one of the lower traffic count generators. Can you comment on that. Hawkins Clark: It was a bad day. Staff has re -thought that. Those are national transportation engineer figures that seem to have been accounted for. This is the only – there are only two projects that are coming in right now and certainly when you look at traffic generation you can't really take into account projects that aren't before this commission. Your really only have two projects that are before you and to put some controls on—your certainly not going to put a control on the ice arena. They are going to have events and that will draw—I think the apartment complexes—we did talk about if they are doing the 140 previously they had outlined a phase one which was more or less the northwest portion of their site B there and it didn't provide for any vehicular access out of that phase one out onto Millenium Way. Every one of those 140 was funneling out through the driveway onto Overland at the west end and not Millenium Way which is the collector. I think we would point out that we would like to see some kind of vehicular access in phase one over to Millenium Way. Meridian Planning an,''oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 9 Bowcutt: I think the applicant indicated at the last hearing he would be willing to revise what they had proposed as their first 140 units because you felt or this commission felt it was critical that they intersect with Millenium Way. So their will be an access. We will go on the record with the first phase will intersect with Millenium Way by that vehicular connection. Barbeiro: The final point was, the gates we discussed in the last one to prevent cross tracking through the residential from the high school over to Locust Grove, the developer suggested putting gates in. Is that something that will be a final item for you or is it still up in the air. Bowcutt: I think they are still under the opinion that they would prefer some type of gates. Borup: This was a gate at which point? Barbeiro: There was to be a gate over the Hunter Lateral crossing to prevent the kids from crossing through the apartments and the developer also considered putting a gate into the entrance off of Overland and just past the entrance off of Millenium Way. I believe there were three gates. Is that correct. Bowcutt: Yes, that was my understanding. We would have to have approval from your fire department to install those. The location would also have to be approved by Ada County Highway District because they want to make sure you have adequate stacking room. Borup: Has that been discussed with ACHD staff? Bowcutt: It was brought up briefly and their comment was we have to have adequate stacking room. They allow you to do it within a private roadway network as long as you have it 50 or 75 feet into the property. Maybe its 100, 1 can't remember. The last one I had was a mini storage. They don't want 3 or 4 cars turning into the site and then waiting for the gate and sticking out into the roadway. I would recommend that the commission put their subject to Ada County Highway District and fire department approval. Borup: The only other comment I think staff was on the fence —1 don't think the staff comments addressed that either way, or did they. (Inaudible)privacy fence (inaudible). There is no concern there is there. Hawkins Clark: No. Norton: I have a question for staff. At our last public hearing I had a question about gates, but has been addressed. My notes say signage of gates would be worked out with staff. Has signage been addressed. Meridian Planning anc` ,)ning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 10 Hawkins Clark: Signage of the gates –of the project. They did have a written response on signage from I believe Idaho Electric Signs and then McKeegan responded for signage on the ice arena in writing. That should be in the packets. Bowcutt: I think we did have a discussion because they had some types of lights on the side of building. Norton: That was addressed on the ice arena, but for the apartment complex— Bowcutt: I did provide some specifications on signage. I believe it was a monument type sign. END OF SIDE ONE Bowcutt: I'll have to check my packet. I believe it was a monument sign. That is what staff has proposed. Borup: I think we'd be comfortable that it wouldn't be anything difference than a monument sign. Anything else. You checking or are you done Becky. Oh. Any final comments from staff. Hawkins Clark: Commissioner I think the main concern—I don't know that there is an emergency vehicular access issue has been resolved to our satisfaction. With the school site—schools are allowed in the R-4 without any public hearings. They can just come in when they get this approved and not have any public hearings on the school site and really this is the opportunity to deal with the school site even though the majority of this— Borup: You taking about a secondary access. Hawkins Clark: Yes. What did they say potentially 1800 students or something. We certainly understand and want to support the protecting these neighborhoods from cross through traffic from the school, but there is a stub street here on the west boundary of the site and then there is a stub street here immediately next to the future park site, which would be here. Whether or not those are extended into the site or how that would work, I guess our main issue or concern is that it be dealt with and maybe it can be dealt with at Council level, but somehow there'd be another access into this 55 acre school site other than just Millenium Way, particularly for emergency vehicles. Borup: Have you discussed it to what point. Would the emergency break away ballards or something like that. Hawkins Clark: Right. I don't believe the fire department has really specifically addressed it. Meridian Planning ar'..oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 11 Barbeiro: Brad, we have two opportunities to add emergency access. Is this where the seminary is going? Hawkins Clark: No. Here, right. Barbeiro: With the new LDS church, is there any opportunity to have a emergency access straight through their property or off of this road here as that roads appears to abut the property of the high school. Hawkins Clark: Commissioner, the LDS church is being built. It is designed. The site is under construction. I don't think there is any opportunity there. Borup: Sounds like here and here are the two stub streets. I don't think the intention is to have a traffic flow through there. Break away emergency ballard would let the fire trucks through and isn't that staffs concern. Do we know where this building maybe sited. Bowcutt: I can answer that question. The only information we received from the school district is that the school would most likely sit back in this location here up against this Hunter Lateral. Obviously the parking lots and field would be back here. There is two existing public streets right here coming into Raven Hills and another one here in Los Alamitos. It is the highway districts intention that those not be connected to the site vehicularly for like student use but be connected for pedestrian bicycle and possibly emergency access. I would assume something like ballards or maybe what they propose there. It depends on the site configuration. I stopped at Mr. Carberry's office today to see if I could obtain a copy of their draft site plan. He indicated that he does not have a copy of it. You got one. He said I don't have one, in fact I think they are still working on it. Your going to have to talk to Skyler at Hummel Architects. I said it would be nice Jim if I could see it to make sure your needs are met as far as secondary emergency access. Until we see where those circulation patterns of the school are located, we don't know what to do. Borup: Maybe at this point we just need to put some requirements in there and let them design around it. Bowcutt: Our agreement with the school district states that we ... the seller acknowledges that the above described street, which is our Millenium Way, shall be the sole access route to the school which buyer intends to construct on the premises other than the emergency access here and after set forth. So, (inaudible) if we it we'd want an emergency access through you. Borup: So hereinafter set forth they are not specified. Meridian Planning an'~'oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 12 Bowcutt: Yeah, it was emergency vehicle access if required. In order to meet uniform fire code. (Inaudible) got a lot of parking lot along here, if they need it and if that is a adequate location, then it makes sense that we do have a secondary emergency access. It would all depend on their site plan and their needs. Borup: What are saying would be secondary. Bowcutt: If you look at— Borup: Okay, the access is still from Millenium right? Bowcutt: Yes sir. Borup: So from Millenium Drive is blocked there is no secondary access. Bowcutt: This is their primary vehicular access. There is landscaping and parking areas— Borup: Okay, your saying they could come down here through the parking lot into the site. Bowcutt: Exactly. So if the school says based on our configuration we need some emergency vehicle access here or here or even link into this drive that wraps around here. That would be an option. If its needed. I have not seen the site plan. Have you seen it. You got a copy of it. Barbeiro: It was the first draft which was two months ago. Bowcutt: Oh. He said they are still working on it. I am going to try to obtain a copy hopefully before we go to the council because I'd like them to see that and I think it would be beneficial if we know what it looks like. Borup: Sounds like the mood of the City and probably the Commissioner's is that there needs to be some type of emergency secondary access. Not a vehicle access but just emergency. Barbeiro: So when building our recommendation we would include additional emergency access through this site to be determined later. Or more specific. Borup: I don't know that we need to be more specific as long as there is another access. Hatcher: One thing to take into consideration when we are discussing emergency access of the future high school site is as Becky has pointed out, if we were to bring in a second emergency access in the approximate location of the ice hockey arena or Meridian Planning anr'�oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 13 possibly at the apartments, first of all the apartments are a congested meandering parking lot. There is no primary means of traffic, just a private roadway system. I don't think that is a valid option. Second, bringing a secondary emergency access in and around the ice skating rink I don't think is a valid option either for the sample fact that if you have a event occurring your going to have high traffic volume there. Playing devil's advocate we have an event at the school that requires emergency vehicles and we have the ice rink letting out. Millenium and all those roads are going to be plugged. When considering an emergency access to the high school, I think we should look at the options of doing emergency break away ballards down at Raven the Subdivision down below with the public road. Borup: What is the purpose of the secondary emergency access. Hatcher: If the fire truck can't get to — Borup: And that would be because of heavy traffic or because of some accident blocking the entire roadway. I assume it would be something blocking the entire roadway and then they would need another access. Hatcher: That is correct and that is why I am saying if we (inaudible) by the ice rink, they are too close together. Borup: Your saying something would be blocking both roads. Hatcher: I am saying if an event at the ice rink was to let out— Borup: That's just heavy traffic. That's not necessarily blocking — Hatcher: Hey, we've all been there. We know what it can really be like. One all ready looks like it is all ready a culdesac if I'm not mistaken. One of the two southern ones— we put the condition on the school district now and let them design accordingly and be done with it. Barbeiro: Couldn't we have a primary and a secondary. Hatcher: You would. Millenium would be your primary. We are talking about the secondary right now. I don't think this site is big enough to need three accesses. Borup: Okay, one of you guys had a motion earlier. Hatcher: I was trying to make a motion to close the public hearing. Norton: I second the motion. Borup: All in favor. Meridian Planning an,,—oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 14 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Barbeiro: Which hearing did we just close. Borup: Technically we closed— Hatcher: Can we close all of them, one through six. Borup: Technically we closed 3, cause that is the only one we opened. I think all the testimony we received was on all the applications, so — Hatcher: Mr. Chairman, I motion that we close the public hearing for Item 4,5,and 6. Borup: Let me open it. Open public hearing for Item number 4. Hatcher: I motion that we close it. Norton: I second it. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: I'd like to open Item number 5. Hatcher: I motion that we close it. Norton: I second it. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: I'd like to open Item number 6. Hatcher: I motion that we close that. Norton: I second that. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: Would you like to handle Items 1 and 2 and then go on to the others. Meridian Planning anr—oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 15 Barbeiro: Can we do both of them at the same time. Borup: They are both two separate items, but get those two out of the way and then get into the other—or those two have all ready been closed, so— Barbeiro: If there is no discussion, I have a motion. I motion that we recommend to City Council request for annexation and zoning of 16.119 acres from RT to CG for proposed Resolution Business Park by G.L. Voigt Development to include staff comments. Hatcher: I second the motion. Borup: Any discussion. Norton: I have discussion. I believe we discussed the CG change to CN change. I'd like to make a friendly amendment to that motion that the CG be amended. Barbeiro: Thank you Commissioner Norton, you are correct and I wish to amend that to be a CN. Borup: Any other discussion. All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: Item number 2. Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman, I wish to recommend approval to City Council request for rezone of 37.64 acres from R-4 to L-0 for proposed Resolution Business Park by G.L. Voigt Development with staff comments. Hatcher: Second the motion. Borup: Any discussion. All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: We have four more items. Again, comments have been concerning all of them. We have two items on the preliminary plat. No one item, sorry. Barbeiro: The discussion between myself and Commissioner Hatcher has to do with— we would like—here's what we're differing. I would like to see a development agreement between ACHD and the developer prior to any certificate of occupancy of any building. Meridian Planning ani oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 16 Hatcher: What I was trying to go for on a condition of approval from this board or recommended condition of approval to City Council would be that no certificate of occupancy would be issued to any of the proposed developments of this project until Overland Road improvements have been instructed. If that means the ice rink waits until 2002 or 2003, so be it. Barbeiro: You want a 5 lane road before anything opened. That is going to put a crimp in the developer, but I think if we had a development agreement with ACHD and the developer to have 5 lanes prior to fall 2002 when the high school opened, seeing how the development would be phased, I believe that would be correct and proper with this development. I would hate to see the development held back because the 5 lanes wasn't open for then as a condition they have to ensure that it is at least 3 lanes. If they are going to go out and do 3 lanes then ACHD is going to come in tear it out. That seems like a tremendous waste of public funds. Hatcher: Absolutely. If it boils down to working things out with ACHD. Borup: Oh it does and I agree with what your saying there, but your putting a requirement on the developer that they got no control over. Barbeiro: If we have a development agreement, that is something the developer and ACHD— Borup: ACHD don't do development agreements specifically do they. Just a written agreement. Hatcher: Putting money into a slush fund for future improvement on this project is not acceptable in my opinion. That is exactly what ACHD will do. I have no opposition of the project. In fact it is a wonderful project. Overland Road can not handle any capacity that this project would generate without the required improvements. Barbeiro: So ACHD does not do development agreements so this— Borup: I don't know if that is the terminology they use. I am not sure either way. I just have not heard that used before. Hatcher: Bruce can you comment on how ACHD typically has been dealing with those issues. Freckleton: Commissioner Hatcher and members of the commission Becky was just indicating that she is aware of one that they have done with Touchmark. I know they do non -development agreements when you have a plat and your doing it in phases if you want to record the entire plat without bonding or building the other phase. That is something we would have to address with them. Meridian Planning an,�oning Commission ^ May 9, 2000 Page 17 Barbeiro: What would staff's recommendations be to insure that somehow we have an agreement amongst all the parties that this is going to be 5 lanes prior to a large portion of occupancy. I do not want to put a high school there without a five lane road. Hatcher: I personally don't want to stop the project. I don't want to stop construction of any of the projects on the site, but I don't want to see any of them operable until the road is done. Freckleton: My personal opinion would be unless we've got it nailed down when these things are going to happen, I would not even issue the building permit. Your looking at a can of worms if you issue a building permit and hold up occupancy without some dates being set. Hatcher: Okay so the building permit will not be issued until some sort of agreement is been reached without Ada County so that their construction schedule coincides with the projects construction schedule as deemed by the time line we are discussing. Basically what that does—I would say put one hand behind the developers back. Now we are putting both hands behind with the building permit because there is a lot of negotiations that have to go on between the developer and ACHD to meet these requirements. Barbeirc: Mr. Chairman would it be of any assistance to re -open the public hearing and get some comments from the developer on this. Hatcher: I don't think it is going to help. Borup: Have you got your thoughts together on what it is that you maybe recommending. Barbeiro: Well, now that I know there really is no such thing as a development with ACHD and my other concerns are that with the new high school, this would also stop any issuance of a building permit for a new high school to be built which would cause great problems with the school bond election coming up because of the state law requiring the school to allocate the funds for and spend the funds any certain time frame. If they can not get a building permit that may cause problems with the school bonding. Hatcher: Keep in mind as well as it was brought up by staff, school district does not need public hearing. As soon as phase one is done and Millenium Drive is built, that high school can go up. We have no control over that, so any conditions as of brought of that includes traffic, any conditions we want to impose on that high school have to be done during phase one. You could have 5000 high school kids going to high school on a 2 or 3 lane road. Borup: Do any Commissioner's remember what the going to the 3 lanes what that did to the service and what the road could handle. I am not finding that. Do you remember Meridian Planning ar"70ning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 18 that Brad at all. What capacity was that going to add. Where I was going or at least the ACHD report is saying that the present configuration on Overland can handle a little less than 3000 additional vehicles. In the same paragraph they are saying that it would add 6. They are over 3000 short without —that's with the current road. I am not sure what the 3 lane would add to that capacity. I don't think it adds a lot of vehicle capacity. It will alleviate congestion. Hatcher: The third lane is a turning lane so it's going to allow people to stack up so that they won't be able to turn left because of on coming traffic. Borup: ACHD's statement is that a traffic signal is not warranted yet because traffic volumes are low enough. Barbeiro: That's Locust Grove and Overland, not Millenium. Borup: No, the side driveway is on Overland. I don't think they are taking the school into consideration on any of these figures. That adds a whole different aspect of it. Barbeiro: I need your assistance on this so we don't shut down the developer, we don't shut down the high school but we insure that there is a five lane road. Something that we don't seem to have a lot of control over. Borup: It is in the hand of ACRD. 1 don't have an answer to that. I think we can make some recommendations and let City Council look at it. Hatcher: The way we would want to word it to City Council would be that we recommend approval pending — Barbeiro: ACHD's commitment to widen that road. Hatcher: Commitment is not good enough. It has to be in writing. Barbeiro: Well, can the City work into a development agreement with ACHD as opposed to the developer. Hatcher: I don't think you want to bring the city into this. Borup: Why would the city want to. Barbeiro: We'd have a bigger gun than the developer does. Borup: To do what. Hatcher: We do? Meridian Planning ar—'oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 19 Barbeiro: Sounded good. Borup: Lets go ahead. Lets get a recommendation drafted and put the conditions on you'd like to and --. At this point I assume your going to incorporate staff comments. Barbeiro: I have some comments within those too. Mr. Chairman, I move that we recommend approval to City Council request for preliminary plat of 17 lots on 107.06 acres in proposed L-0 zone and C -N zones for proposed Resolution Business Park by G.L. Voigt Development to include staff comments making note of Item 8 on page 6 that we would recommend an easement as opposed to a separately platted buffer— Swartley: Mr. Chairman, Mr. Barbeiro what are you trying to do an easement as opposed to a buffer? Barbeiro: As I read it, the staff wanted to have a separate common lot as opposed to an easement. Swartley: Oh okay. I understand. Barbeiro: That Item number 10 that applicant will go ahead and build a privacy fence, Item number 11, the applicant will built a vehicular access over the Hunter Lateral between site B and site A, included in that the developer will put a operable gate there lith c,:operation of the Meridian Fire Department to prevent student crossing to get over to Locust Grove. Help me out with number 12. The applicant wanted a minimum of 35 foot landscape buffer. We are going to allow them to put a meandering sidewalk as opposed to a sidewalk right up to the easement. Page 8, item 7 allowing them to— Swartley: Mr. Barbeiro could you repeat the numbers 10 and 11 for me please. Barbeiro: Number 10 were we—the developer build the privacy fence. Number 11 in his cross access between site B and site A we put an emergency gate or a gate between the two with the cooperation of the Meridian Fire Department. This is all subject to the recommendation of ACHD and the Meridian Fire Department. Borup: That was on the motion. Hatcher: Road improvements, refresh my memory. We going to tack that onto the preliminary plat or conditional use permit. Borup: I thought you were doing it on the conditional use permit. I think they lumped it all together. The traffic is going to be generated by the conditional use permit project not by the plat. Hatcher: Okay, lets see if I got this right. Meridian Planning anr'" oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 20 Borup: ACHD's comments addressed everything all together. They combined all their comments as a project as a whole. Hatcher: The last outstanding issue I wanted to add to Commissioner Barbeiro's motion is that a written agreement between the developer and ACHD that coordinates and synchronizes construction completion of a 5 lane Overland improvement prior to the completion of phase one occupancy. The agreement be submitted to the City of Meridian prior to the issuance of a building permit. Norton: I would like to add to that motion that a revised preliminary plat to reflect the changes that have been discussed be submitted to the city prior to the City Council meeting. Borup: I think that was in the staff comments all ready. Hatcher: So you made the motion, we amended it so your going to have to second it. Barbeiro: To include their comments from Commissioner's Hatcher and Norton in the motion. Norton: I'll Second. Borup: Any other discussion. Seeing none, all in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Barbeiro: I wish to recommend approval to City Council request for conditional use permit for proposed planned commercial development consisting of multi family commercial, and LDS seminary in proposed L-0 and C -N zoning by G.L. Voigt Development to incorporate all of our notes from Item number 3. Borup: This was a conceptual concept that was made mention earlier. This is a conceptual approval of the project as a whole. Barbeiro: And to include that page 10, item 11 storage areas that we waive the requirement for storage areas, page 10 item 12 that we waive the requirement for a maintenance building. Borup: Actually that should come under item 5. Barbeiro: Thank you Mr. Chairman. You are correct. (Inaudible) make the recommendation for approval for incorporating all the comments from Item number 3. Hatcher: I will second that. Meridian Planning ar-"-Zoning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 21 Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: Okay now item number 5 which is the conditional use permit for the apartment complex. Barbeiro: I wish to recommend approval to City Council request for conditional use permit for proposed 200 unit luxury apartment complex to be zoned L-0 for proposed Resolution Business Park by Desert West Properties, LLC to include all comments from Item 3 and Item 4 and from page 10 item 11 the storage areas waiving the requirement for storage areas, page 10 item 12 waiving the requirement for a maintenance building, page 11 CP apartment complex, item number 2 where staff recommends a number of units constructed in phase one be limited to a maximum of 30, make that a maximum of 140. Hatcher: I second the motion. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman I wish to recommend approval to City Council request for conditional use permit for an ice arena consisting of office, pro shop, fitness center, restaurant, locker rooms, equipment storage and arenas zoned L -O by Pat McKeegan to incorporate staff comments and comments from Item 3,4, and 5. Hatcher: Before this last issue is voted on, the preliminary plat did we property address the secondary emergency access to the high school. Borup: No we didn't. We spend time talking about it and then did not get it in the motion. We need to address that. We need to go back and amend the motion. Norton: I second the motion on number 6. Borup: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman, I wish to return to item number 3, the preliminary plat for the 17 lots and make an amendment to include the or note the developer will work in conjunction with the school district and arrange a secondary emergency access through their property apart from the primary access on Millenium Drive. Borup: Do you want to be more specific. Meridian Planning an 'oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 22 Hatcher: I think you want to be more specific in location. What I just heard you say is a second emergency access through the current development. I would prefer to have a second emergency access through break away bollards down at Raven Hill. Borup: The road is all ready there. The stub street is there. It is all ready dead ended. Hatcher: It is a stub street. You'd have to dead end it with emergency bollards. Barbeiro: Is the school property also part— Borup: That is a separate lot and they will not be coming before us for the school property. Hatcher: It is not part of phase one but it is part of this development. Barbeiro: I would concur. We have a secondary access from the south through one of the two roads that are coming in. Borup: Emergency break away bollards not direct vehicle access. I think that sounds consistent with ACHD wants also. The no vehicle access is consistent. We need a whole site. Hatcher: You have the adjacent Subdivisions. Borup: What do you want, street names. There is only two streets to choose from. Two out of the two. Go over and talk to staff. Let them choose a street and it not come from the north. Bruce, do you have any idea how man times in the last five years the fire department has ever gone through the break away bollard. Okay that's what I felt. Did you hear that comment Commissioner's? Commissioner's: No. Borup: As far as Bruce has understand it the fire department has never had to use emergency access and the break away bollards. I am saying it needs to be there, but its not going to be a traffic issue. Hatcher: The one street we are talking about is East Blue Tick Street. The other road appears to be South Red Cloud Avenue. Borup: The reason I asked that question maybe for anyone living in those areas, the emergency access not be a traffic—it hasn't happened yet in this town, but like anything it is an emergency. It is there for emergency, so its there. Brad did you have some input. The amended motion was to state a southern emergency access. Meridian Planning an,6--7oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 23 Barbeiro: A southern emergency access with break away bollards and not regular traffic. Borup: No specific street? Hatcher: No specific streets required. Borup: So, if they can come up with another street, that's fine. Barbeiro: Before we make the final vote, lets see if staff has anything. Borup: The motion that is in effect now is that there be an emergency access from one of the southern streets, not from the northern. We did not specify beyond that. Did you have anything to add. Hawkins Clark: Commissioner just as a suggestion that was provided which has not been considered. As far as emergency there is here on Locust Grove, as I understand the goal of your discussion as a Commission is to help get emergency access so that Overland is not the only way. Another one on Locust. One suggestion is to provide on the southern portion emergency ingress egress here on the southern portion north of this LDS church that is being built between the retail and the daycare which does access the high school site. Borup: So, that could be a third option. Hawkins Clark: Could be in terms of accessibility and response time for EMS, police, fire. Certainly an argument can be made for greater direct access as compared to going through either Los Alamitos or Raven Hill. END OF SIDE TWO Borup: to work out as far as the access for them. Barbeiro: Okay lets go ahead and say that additional access the developer will work with the school district of the options themselves for along the southwest boundaries. Commissioner Norton, does that work for you? Okay. Hatcher: I second the amended motion. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Norton: Mr. Chairman I would like to have a little more discussion on number 5 with the apartment complex. 140 apartments, does that also include the club house? I'd like to Meridian Planning ar"?oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 24 amend the motion then to include the club house to be constructed along with the 140 apartments. Borup: Is that different that the original or what the developer was planning. And the club house. Norton: Okay, I'll withdraw that. Borup: Anything or are we ready to move on. Let's take a short break. 7. TABLED FROM APRIL 11, 2000: REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL 77 FOOT HIGH POLE SIGN FOR CHEVRON/MCDONALDS BY EAGLE PARTNER, LLC -603 S. EAGLE ROAD: Borup: This item was tabled to allow more information which I think you've each received in your packets. Do we have any comments, questions or discussion or anybody ready for a motion. Norton: I am ready to make a motion on number 7. 1 would like to recommend to City Council the request for modification of conditional use permit to allow additional 77 foot high pole sign for Chevron/McDonalds by Eagie Partners be denied based on using the Comprehensive Plan as a guide only and taking into consideration the following: 1. The pylon sign was not addressed in the development agreement with the city on March 9, 1999. 2. This commission made a decision in June of 1999 that a pylon sign is inappropriate. 3. A Chevron pylon sign doesn't set an appropriate tone for entering the Magic View Subdivision. 4. This pylon sign is too close proximity to a neighborhood. Hatcher: I second the motion. Borup: Discussion. Barbeiro: When we voted in June of 1999 on this issue, the Nvo primary items that I saw were that the light from this sign would be detrimental to the neighbors and that there was presented an ordinance that only freeway frontage could have such a sign. In our last— Borup: Freeway frontage or freeway business. Barbeiro: Freeway business I believe it was. And, as I recall --do we have such an ordinance. I was unable to find such an ordinance saying that: freeway business or freeway frontage is a requirement for a pylon sign. Borup: I don't believe so. �1 WHITE, PETERSON, PRUSS MORROW & GIGRAY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW JULIE KLEIN FISCHER WM. F. GIGRAY, In BRENTJ.JOHNSON A SAMUEL JOHNSON WILLIAM A. MoRRow WILLIAM K NICHOLS CHRisTOPnER S. NYE PHILIP A. P=soN STEARIN B. PRUSS ERIC S. RossMAN TODD A. RossMAN DAVID M. S WARTLEY TERRENCER. WHITE To: Staff Applicant Affected Property Owner(s) 200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE POST OFFICE Box 1150 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680-1150 TEL 208)288-2499 FAX ( 08) 288-2501 May 23, 2000 Re: Application Case No. AZ -00-004 Hearing Date: June 6. 2000 NAMPA OFFICE 104 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH POST OFFICE BOX 247 NAMPA, IDAHO 83653-0247 TEL.208) 466-9272 FAX( 08) 4664405 PLEASE REPLY TO MERIDIAN OFFICE .J U N - 1 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Staff, Applicant and/or Affected Property Owner(s): Please note that these Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be presented to the -City Council at the public hearing on the above referenced matter by the Planning and Zoning Administrator. Due to the volume of matters which the City Council must decide, and to insure your position is understood and clear, it is important to have a consistent format by which matters are presented at the public hearings before the City Council. The City Council strongly recommends: That you take time to carefully review the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, and be prepared to state your position on this application by addressing the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission; and That you carefully complete (be sure it is legible) the Position Statement if you disagree with the Findings and -Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Position Statement form for this application is available at the City Clerk's office. It is recommended that you prepare a Position Statement and deliver it to the City Clerk prior to the hearing, if possible. If that's not possible, please present your Position Statement to the City Council at the hearing, along with eight (8) copies. The copies will be Zoning presented to the Mayor, Council, Planning and Administrator, Public Works and the City Attorney. If you are a part of a group, it is strongly recommended that one Position Statement be filled out for the group, which can be signed by the representative for the group. IY/ BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 16.119 ACRES FROM R-2 TO C -G FOR RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY G.L. VOIGT Case No. AZ -090-004 RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL 1. The property is approximately 16.1 acres in size and is located at the SE corner of Overland Road and S. Locust Grove Road. The property is designated as Resolution Business Park. Idaho. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is Overland LLC of Boise, 3. Applicant is owner of record. 4. The property is presently zoned by Ada County as R -T, and consists of Rural Transitional agricultural land. S. The Applicant requests the property be zoned as C -G. 6. The subject property is bordered to the north by C -G zoning, to the south and west by R-1 and R-4, and to the ease by Ada County R T and city limits of the City of Meridian are adjacent and abut to the north, south and west of the subject property. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 1 ANNEXATION AND ZONING - RESOLUTION PLAZA, - G.L. VOIGT 7. The property which is the subject of this application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 8. The entire parcel of the property is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 9. The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following manner: planned commercial development. 10. The Applicant requests zoning of the subject real property as C -G which is consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map which designates the subject property as Mixed Planned Use Development. 12. There are no significant or scenic features of major importance that affect the consideration of this application. RECOMMENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the requested annexation as requested by the Applicant, but that the zoning as recommended by the Staff should be a lower intensity commercial zone, Neighborhood Commercial (C -N), rather than C -G, for the property described in the application subject to signing a development agreement. ZAWork\M\Mezidian 15360M\Rewmmendations\1Z004Resolution.Ree RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 2 ANNEXATION AND ZONING - RESOLUTION PLAZA - G.L. VOIGT r'1 Will Berg From: jansyl@micron.net Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 9:07 AM To: bergw@ci.meridian.id.us PAaP 1 of 7 YY�tt�- �-lo-a b Subject: Fw: G.L. Voigt Development of Resolution Business Park City Council J U N - 6 7000 Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 5:39 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN Subject: G.L. Voigt Development of Resolution Business Park City Council To: Meridian City Council Re: G.L. Voigt Development Mr. Berg, Tammy DeWeerd suggested I send the following information to you in the event I am unable to attend the 6/6/00 meeting regarding G. L. Voigt and the development of Resolution Business Park. I currently reside in the Summerfield Subdivision at the NE corner of Ustick and North Locust Grove in the city of Meridian. This subdivision was developed by G.L. Voigt ( a few phases were not, but I am addressing the ones that were). The developer was responsible for the perimeter fence. A fence was erected, however the section on Locust Grove is falling over after only three years. The developer was responsible for the pressurized irrigation system. A trouble -prone pooly designed system was installed causing several homeowners unneccessary expenses. The developer was responsible for drainage in the subdivsion. Houses were built such that water drains to the adjacent house to the rear. No drainage was installed between the 'park' and the adjacent lots causing the park to drain to the adjacent properties. Drainage problems occur in the street storm drains, they appear to be under -sized. The deveoper was responsible for each lot being built. There is one home in Summerfield that has been under construction for 6 years. The developer was supposed to provide a common area 230 x 140, large enough to accomodate a soccer field. I still haven't come across that yet. If the Council decides to approve the development of Resolution Park by G. L.. Voigt what, if any, checks and balances will there be to assure that: a) the project won't fall apart in 3 years b) quality design will be used c) drainage problems will be addressed and resolved prior to construction d) the project will be completed e) the developer will provide all that has been agreed upon Thank you, Jan Sylvester 1775 E. Summerheights Drive Meridian, Idaho 6/6/00 Page 2 of 2 83642 208 8845680 6/6/00 June 2, 2000 CUP 00-016 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 6, 2000 APPLICANT G.L. Voigt / Overland, LLC ITEM NO. 14 REQUEST Cup for a 200 -unit luxury apartment complex in proposed L -O zone for proposed Resolution Business Park - south of Overland Road, east of Locust Grove Rd AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: rJ US WEST: Ili INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS See attached PZ minutes See attached recommendations Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING --MAY 9, 2000 The regular scheduled meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission was call to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Keith Borup. MEMBERS PRESENT: Keith Borup, Sally Norton, Kent Brown, Tom Barbeiro, Richard Hatcher. OTHERS PRESENT: David Swartley, Bruce Freckleton, Brad Hawkins Clark, Will Berg. Borup: We'd like to call to order our meeting this evening. This is a regular scheduled meeting for Planning and Zoning Commission. I'd like to go through attendance of the Commissioner's. First item on the agenda is the Consent Agenda. I would entertain a motion for approval of the Consent Agenda. Brown: Mr. Chairman I would move approval of the Consent Agenda, Items A,B and C, minutes from the March 22"d, April 3rd and April 11th meetings. Hatcher: I second the motion. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Brown: I would like to be excused for the first 7 items. Borup: Okay. Have fun. Item number 1 and 2 yvere tabled. I believe we tabled those items wanting to finalize Items 3 through 6. Would we like to skip to Items 3 through 6 and come back or would the Commissioner's like to open and vote on 1 and 2 right now. 3. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF 17 LOTS ON 107.06 ACRES IN PROPOSED L -O AND C -G ZONES FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC—OVERLAND AND LOCUST GROVE ROADS: Borup: Does staff have any additional comments to make on this. It was continued for the ACHD report. We had the draft report a while back. We have the final report now. Is the applicant here and like to come forward. Do any of the Commissioner's have anything additional they'd like to ask the applicant, other than the ACHD report. Bowcutt: These items were deferred because we were awaiting Ada County Highway District Staff Report as you recall at our public hearing a month or so ago. We had not even received a draft. The staff, I think they went through about 3 versions of the draft and it did go to the highway district Commissioner's last Wednesday at their noon meeting for discussion. To bring you up to date the Commissioner's did recommend Meridian Planning and�Zoning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 2 approval of all the projects involved. They instructed their staff to get with us and the City of Meridian and the school district and see what can be done to exhilarate the upgrade of Overland Road between Locust Grove and Eagle Road. At this point of time, it is on their 2004 plan. They realize that they could have an operational high school as early as 2002. That did concern them. They have also required multiple improvements of my client, which includes constructing a 3"d lane from the east end of our property up to the intersection of Locust Grove and then south on Locust Grove to our southerly boundary. On of the comments that was made by the Commission, that type of improvement can run anywhere from $125 to $175 thousand dollars. If we go in and we construct that 3rd lane and then they come in 6, 12, 18 months later and tear it all out to build their five lane, it makes more sense that we exhilarate the 5 lane and put those monies to use building or helping to construct the 5 lane. Therefore, it would save some public funds. The things that I want to bring to your attention that they placed upon this project, they have asked us to contribute 25% of a signal at the intersection of Locust Grove and Overland. The intersection operates at a level of service A at this time, however, the left hand turn lane operates at a level of service F. According to ACHD's traffic counts the counts at this time do not warrant signalization. In the future they realize they will need a signal there. They understand that the retail that we propose at that corner is down the road is not one of the first 3 or 4 phases that is going to be further down the road then that. Probably co-insiding with some type of a Locust Grove overpass. They accept the fact that a light is necessary, but state they will construct that light when it is warranted. Secondly, they have asked us to contribute $112,500 which would be 75% of the light at our new Millenium Way Overland intersection which is the collector roadway for the high school. That 75% does include the high school or the school district share. My conversations with the school district, they have indicated that they will pay whatever proportionate share the highway district deems is attributed to their traffic volume. There is approximately 5000 trips a day through Millenium Way. Of those 5,000, 3,000 will be from going to and from the high school site. They've asked us to contribute $52,800 dollars to a trust fund for sidewalk along Overland Road. We asked them to allow us to construct the sidewalk versus trust funding for it. The policy of the City of Meridian is they would like to see those sidewalks go in as soon as possible. Their concern was if we placed the sidewalk in at the edge of the new right of way that it could be torn out when the road is rebuilt. Our suggestion was we'll take the sidewalk and meander within our 30 foot landscaped area. Therefore, we will be outside the right of way and would not require any modification. The Commission seemed to believe that's a viable option. They asked staff to get with us and discuss it. We will be building decel lanes at the intersection. They ok'ed all of our approaches on Overland Road. They asked us to upgrade our collector. We shoed a 41 foot collector roadway section for Millenium Way. They indicated they'd like that to be 46 foot section. My client agreed to that. They asked us to provide adequate stacking room for any of the approaches as they intercept with Millenium Way. The only major revision was on Locust Grove. We have this approach right here. They have asked us to move this to offset it from this roadway here to Meridian Planning anti -Zoning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 3 increase that distance of offset. We will shift this building this direction and then shift this to the south and then put parking in there. Our offsets from all of the major intersections for the signal will be installed in the future are acceptable. This was the only thing of significance. This is a multi phased project and the highway district commission liked this—the idea of a long term project. The first phase will be the ice hockey facility. The second phase would consist of 140 units of the total 200 apartments, 2001. The seminary will go in whatever time the high school goes in. All of this is down the road. Your staff placed a limitation on the conditional use permit for the apartments -40 units in the first phase. I brought that up with Ada County Highway District and they said that doesn't make any sense. That is one of the lowest traffic generators on the site. Also, you can't afford to pay all of these trust funds and make all the improvements if you can't begin the projects. 40 units is not acceptable. My clients indicate they can not function with 40 units. Ada County Highway District did look at impact fees generated by this project. The school district is exempt from impact fees but all of the uses on the property would be subject. The multi family project would pay $160,000 in impact fees. The retail space would generate over one million dollars. That brings you up to date. Barbeiro: Becky is Millenium Drive to be placed as part of the first phase. Bowcutt: Yes sir. The first, phase we are constructing all of the public roadway systems. We'll built Millenium Way and put all the sewer, water, 3 phase power and then build this public street here, the rotary and this public street here. We have all ready designed all of those roadways. Barbeiro: Can you remind me of what kind of meetings you've had with the school district in regards to Millenium Drive, the students that will use that and the roadway being the primary road for all of the construction at the high school. Bowcutt: They will be coming up and down that roadway. It will have to be there before they can pull their permit. The highway district has indicated they want to focus all of the high school traffic where that signal is going to be constructed. Barbeiro: As I recall, the conditional use permit for the high school won't be available until the signal is operational. Bowcutt: According to your planning staff the high school does not require a conditional use permit in their R-4 zone. They will just be submitting for building permit. That is why the highway district imposed the 75% of that light—the $112,000 because they would not see that school application come through. All of my users will be conditional use applications. That was the other thing that they liked. Norton: According to the Ada County Highway District we received the draft report and then the final report sometime today. The difference between the two is that instead of Meridian Planning an�oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 4 paying the $52,000 for the sidewalk on Overland, you will put in the sidewalk in your landscape area. Is that correct? Bowcutt: That's what we requested. Norton: You started to talk about not doing the center lane improvement on Overland in order for Overland to be widened to 5 lanes earlier. Would you go through what you said on that. Bowcutt: In the staff report approved by the Commission it mandates that we construct a 3 I center turn lane for the entire length of our property. It would be from our perimeter to the intersection and then down to our southern boundary here. Three lane on Overland and Locust Grove. Norton: How close is your far east property to Eagle Road? Bowcutt: This is one half mile. In our staff report we are required to construct that. The issue we brought up with the commission is we would like to see the improvements accelerated. We don't want to see the third lane wasted. The elevations will all change. Norton: Did you get any idea how far up the priority list it was going to be moved? Bowcutt: The staff and I had at least four discussions. They indicated that their superiors would not make a decision. We would have to take our plea to the commission and that is what we did. They instructed their staff, you need to figure out a solution and now. With that school coming in 2002, 1 would anticipate them trying to accelerate it two years—If I had to guess. Norton: Are you under the understanding that that road will be five lanes by the time school goes in 2002. Bowcutt: That is what I hope and I think the commission wants their staff to figure out how to do that. Borup: At this point, something could be worked out that's the way to go. If it can't be worked out then the 3 lanes are going in. Bowcutt: We will end up building the third lane. Those requirements are set down. I did forget to mention, they are going to add additional turn lanes at the Eagle Road Overland intersection and that work should begin in a few months and they indicated they are going to get started on the Meridian Road Overland intersection for that improvement. Borup: Before we proceed I'd like a show of hands how many people are here to testify on this application. We have received public testimony over the last three months so Meridian Planning anO-►Zoning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 5 what we'd be open for is anything pertaining to the ACHD report we will be glad to take any testimony on. Bertell: Steve Bertell. I live at 2535 S. Velvet Falls Way. Mr. chairman and members of the commission, at this time I would like to present to the board a total of 725 signatures from residents from all the impacted Subdivisions, all respectfully asking the commission to at least delay the approval of this development until such a time as Overland and Locust Grove Roads are widened. Those who have signed the petitions are frustrated over having to drive in all ready heavily trafficked roadway on a daily basis. We agree with the ACHD impact analysis statement that the findings of the development would only intensify the all ready major traffic problems in this area. In fact, I parked at the intersection of Overland and Locust Grove the afternoon of March 23'd from 3 PM until 6 PM and I counted 3137 vehicles using that intersection, either crossing or turning from one street to another. This coincides with the ACHD report findings of approximately 11,422 vehicles using Overland Road on a daily basis. This is existing traffic. Also, during that 3 hour period, I witnessed one rear ender accident, one near accident and my wife and I came upon another accident on Overland Road on April 10th at 5:50 PM. The traffic on these roads will easily double if not triple as a result of this development. The Ada County Highway District has no plans to widen Overland until 2004 since it is in their 5 year plan. No plans to widen Locust Grove south of Overland until sometime outside the 2005 year plan. No plans to install a traffic light there until it is warranted. I don't know what the definition of warranted is. The developer stated they wanted to start the major ice hockey and sports arena this year pending bond approval. The high school could open as early as fall 2002. Don't misunderstand us. We are not opposed to this development, but what we are saying is that we are requesting that Overland and Locust Grove be widened to accommodate the dramatic traffic increase that this proposal would create. If there is a traffic mishap on the freeway, Overland Road immediately backs up. If emergency vehicle needed to get to one of our Subdivisions, it would be difficult at best for that vehicle to get through. Let's not make Overland and Locust Grove roads another fiasco like the Curtis Road extension was. At least consider the opinions of the 725 residents as well as all of us who live in the 6 impacted Subdivisions. Borup: You feel that the road would be improved on a faster time frame without the million dollars that this project would contribute toward the roads. Bertell: I am a lay man and don't know where the money would come from. We are concerned about— Borup: We are lay men too (Inaudible) and it is not going to come from anywhere other than this type of thing. So, the fastest way to get Overland approved, is to get the money. Since this has been carrying on for several months, we had quite a number of staff recommendations on this project. Do we need a refresher on that. We know staff's recommendation is. I am thinking I mean the applicant either agrees with them or —she mentioned one in her report, so I think I'd like to get Becky back up. You had Meridian Planning an�LZoning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 6 mentioned one item as far as staff recommendation on number of apartment units. We've got your response to all of staff comments. That was the only one that stuck out. Were there any others? That was under the CUP, Item number 2 on your response. Bowcutt: The annexation and zoning application, we were in agreement. preliminary plat, I highlighted item 8. The applicant intends to provide landscape easements along Locust Grove and Overland Roads. An association will be formed to govern perimeter landscaping. We ask that that be an easement. I believe that staff had a discussion about it being a separate lot. Borup: Staff's concern was who will maintain it. Bowcutt: At a minimum the landscape buffer shall be placed within a permanent landscape easement designated such on the plat. We would like that to be designated as an easement on the plat and provide an association for maintenance. Item 8, preliminary plat requirements. Item 10, we agreed to pipe the Hunter Lateral as requested by staff. We ask that we be allowed to provide a western fence along the western side of the apartments. Staff made a statement they prefer that it be unfenced if we pipe the lateral. Clarification on Item 13. We have a little access road. It was not intended to be a private drive. It is an access way providing joint access to those buildings. We just want to clarify that our intention was not to construct curb gutter or sidewalk there because it is an alley access. Under the PUD, I highlighted Item 4. We did not provide any RV storage, parking areas for the multi family. Those uses will be prohibited. Only personal cars will be allowed. We do not propose a maintenance building at this site. All maintenance will be contracted out with a maintenance company. We disagreed on Item 7 concerning the parking requirements. Staff asked for 2.3 spaces per dwelling unit. The ordinance mandates 2. 1 know of no multi family application where staff imposed 2.3. 1 went to another complex that has garages called the Renascence next to Chinden and Eagle Road. We did that civil engineering for that site. That one has garages and I noticed that people who have two cars but have a single garage, their spouse parked in front of the garage. I think what staffs intention for additional parking was for guests or something like that. Our contention is, it is not necessary with our type of design we have more than what we would ever need in parking. For the Ice Rink, I think there was a difference of eight spaces. Mr. McKeegan got up to discuss that stating that we have substantial amount of overflow parking to the north and there will be very few events where you would find that all parking spaces would be completely utilized. His contention was that adequate parking was provided. Obviously we were opposed to the limitation—it was the limitation of 30 units in the first phase of the apartments. We had asked for the first phase to consist of 140. For the record and for those people in the audience that were not here at the last hearing, we are asking for conceptual approval of this planned unit development, but we are only asking for site specific approval for the ice arena and the 200 unit apartments. All the other users with the exception of the high school will have to come back before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. All surrounding properties within 300 feet will be notified. Legal notice will be put in the paper. Each user will have Meridian Planning an9l..Z.,oning Commission �-. May 9, 2000 Page 7 to come back before this body and go through this process again. That is one factor that should be taken into consideration as far as what improvements are done out on these roadway systems when the timing of these lights and so forth. If a user comes in say a year and a half from now, and he will generate a substantial amount of traffic, at that point of time if those improvements aren't out there to support that development, I would anticipate commission having a difficult time of proving it. We've got to start somewhere and we've got to get that collector roadway and this other network of roadways and utilities to provide access to the high school. The only way we can afford to do it is to take these first couple phases and move forward. Borup: Thank you. Any questions from the commission? Barbeiro: We can ask staff questions as a whole or individually. The one that catches my eye right now is the storage areas because that is a city ordinance. Other then that, if you wanted to go down the line with some of the things that Becky disagreed with. Hawkins Clark: Commissioner Barbeiro, members of the Commission the ordinance requirement for storage areas has typically been something that if the developer makes a commitment we have waived at this level. It is not necessarily required a variance. It really particularly when garages are provided. It is something we look favorable at. Borup: At this particular site there is a proposed mini storage unit down the street. Barbeiro: How about the maintenance building. Hawkins Clark: I think when the covenants, correct me Becky if they are not, but typically we –they are going to contract out. That is not ordinance required. I think it is a recommendation. We are fine with that. On the parking issue mainly we were pointing out that the fact that on Valeri Heights no tandem parking was allowed. If your going to allow it here, we just mainly wanted to raise the attention. We certainly aren't looking for more asphalt. I think we concur with the 460 number for required parking. The cross access issue was important. Obviously we'd ask for a revised preliminary plat that shows that, that shows the new Locust Grove Driveways to be submitted for the City Council—prior to the City Council so we can review the revised preliminary plat that reflects these changes. Barbeiro: Becky, in our last meeting, you did tell us that you were going to have a cross access over the Hunter Lateral, is that correct. Bowcutt: Yes, I think our sketched out we were going to make an inter connection between those two buildings and just north of the daycare facility into that little rotary. We make on making that revision and getting that to staff prior to the City Council. Meridian Planning an,�L;oning Commission r May 9, 2000 Page 8 Barbeiro: Brad the recommendation regarding landscape buffers. 25 versus 30 and staff would prefer to have a separate lot where the developer would prefer to have an easement. Comment on that please. Hawkins Clark: This issue comes up frequently. It is mainly our concern is the consistency of appearance for principle arterials like what Overland is going to be. I think in this case with the easement going to be maintained the full buffer distance by a single entity, that's fine. Our main issue is when you have single, multiple single lots that all have a easement, each of them can take care of that landscape however they want. Barbeiro: Becky, the property will remain under one ownership, is that correct. Bowcutt: No sir. When you plat it then it would be eligible to sell off the lots to separate owners. What we propose to do is place landscape easements on the plat and then we will have to have covenants, obviously governing the uses on these lots and so forth. On these covenants it would stipulate like lot owner dues. They would not be homeowners association dues, but lot owner dues which would provide for the maintenance of all of the landscaping. It is all maintained the same. We are going to provide a landscape plan so all of it would be the same. You would not end up with a hodge podge. That is not our intention. Barbeiro: Your new plan will account for 7 handicapped spots at the arena. Bowcutt: Yes sir. Mr. McKeegan when on the record last time that they would add those. Barbeiro: Brad, when we talked about the 30 dwelling units for the apartments, Becky's note was that ACHD thought that the apartments would be one of the lower traffic count generators. Can you comment on that. Hawkins Clark: It was a bad day. Staff has re -thought that. Those are national transportation engineer figures that seem to have been accounted for. This is the only – there are only two projects that are coming in right now and certainly when you look at traffic generation you can't really take into account projects that aren't before this commission. Your really only have two projects that are before you and to put some controls on—your certainly not going to put a control on the ice arena. They are going to have events and that will draw—I think the apartment complexes—we did talk about if they are doing the 140 previously they had outlined a phase one which was more or less the northwest portion of their site B there and it didn't provide for any vehicular access out of that phase one out onto Millenium Way. Every one of those 140 was funneling out through the driveway onto Overland at the west end and not Millenium Way which is the collector. I think we would point out that we would like to see some kind of vehicular access in phase one over to Millenium Way. Meridian Planning an L;oning Commission r, May 9, 2000 Page 9 Bowcutt: I think the applicant indicated at the last hearing he would be willing to revise what they had proposed as their first 140 units because you felt or this commission felt it was critical that they intersect with Millenium Way. So their will be an access. We will go on the record with the first phase will intersect with Millenium Way by that vehicular connection. Barbeiro: The final point was, the gates we discussed in the last one to prevent cross tracking through the residential from the high school over to Locust Grove, the developer suggested putting gates in. Is that something that will be a final item for you or is it still up in the air. Bowcutt: I think they are still under the opinion that they would prefer some type of gates. Borup: This was a gate at which point? Barbeiro: There was to be a gate over the Hunter Lateral crossing to prevent the kids from crossing through the apartments and the developer also considered putting a gate into the entrance off of Overland and just past the entrance off of Millenium Way. I believe there were three gates. Is that correct. Bowcutt: Yes, that was my understanding. We would have to have approval from your fire department to install those. The location would also have to be approved by Ada County Highway District because they want to make sure you have adequate stacking room. Borup: Has that been discussed with ACHD staff? Bowcutt: It was brought up briefly and their comment was we have to have adequate stacking room. They allow you to do it within a private roadway network as long as you have it 50 or 75 feet into the property. Maybe its 100, 1 can't remember. The last one I had was a mini storage. They don't want 3 or 4 cars turning into the site and then waiting for the gate and sticking out into the roadway. I would recommend that the commission put their subject to Ada County Highway District and fire department approval. Borup: The only other comment I think staff was on the fence —1 don't think the staff comments addressed that either way, or did they. (Inaudible)privacy fence (inaudible). There is no concern there is there. Hawkins Clark: No. Norton: I have a question for staff. At our last public hearing I had a question about gates, but has been addressed. My notes say signage of gates would be worked out with staff. Has signage been addressed. Meridian Planning ano_�oning Commission -� May 9, 2000 Page 10 Hawkins Clark: Signage of the gates -of the project. They did have a written response on signage from I believe Idaho Electric Signs and then McKeegan responded for signage on the ice arena in writing. That should be in the packets. Bowcutt: I think we did have a discussion because they had some types of lights on the side of building. Norton: That was addressed on the ice arena, but for the apartment complex— Bowcutt: I did provide some specifications on signage. I believe it was a monument type sign. END OF SIDE ONE Bowcutt: I'll have to check my packet. I believe it was a monument sign. That is what staff has proposed. Borup: I think we'd be comfortable that it wouldn't be anything difference than a monument sign. Anything else. You checking or are you done Becky. Oh. Any final comments from staff. Hawkins Clark: Commissioner I think the main concern—I don't know that there is an emergency vehicular access issue has been resolved to our satisfaction. With the school site—schools are allowed in the R-4 without any public hearings. They can just come in when they get this approved and not have any public hearings on the school site and really this is the opportunity to deal with the school site even though the majority of this— Borup: You taking about a secondary access. Hawkins Clark: Yes. What did they say potentially 1800 students or something. We certainly understand and want to support the protecting these neighborhoods from cross through traffic from the school, but there is a stub street here on the west boundary of the site and then there is a stub street here immediately next to the future park site, which would be here. Whether or not those are extended into the site or how that would work, I guess our main issue or concern is that it be dealt with and maybe it can be dealt with at Council level, but somehow there'd be another access into this 55 acre school site other than just Millenium Way, particularly for emergency vehicles. Borup: Have you discussed it to what point. Would the emergency break away ballards or something like that. Hawkins Clark: Right. I don't believe the fire department has really specifically addressed it. Meridian Planning ar�+.Z,-oning Commission --� May 9, 2000 Page 11 Barbeiro: Brad, we have two opportunities to add emergency access. Is this where the seminary is going? Hawkins Clark: No. Here, right. Barbeiro: With the new LDS church, is there any opportunity to have a emergency access straight through their property or off of this road here as that roads appears to abut the property of the high school. Hawkins Clark: Commissioner, the LDS church is being built. It is designed. The site is under construction. I don't think there is any opportunity there. Borup: Sounds like here and here are the two stub streets. I don't think the intention is to have a traffic flow through there. Break away emergency ballard would let the fire trucks through and isn't that staffs concern. Do we know where this building maybe sited. Bowcutt: I can answer that question. The only information we received from the school district is that the school would most likely sit back in this location here up against this Hunter Lateral. Obviously the parking lots and field would be back here. There is two existing public streets right here coming into Raven Hills and another one here in Los Alamitos. It is the highway districts intention that those not be connected to the site vehicularly for like student use but be connected for pedestrian bicycle and possibly emergency access. I would assume something like ballards or maybe what they propose there. It depends on the site configuration. I stopped at Mr. Carberry's office today to see if I could obtain a copy of their draft site plan. He indicated that he does not have a copy of it. You got one. He said I don't have one, in fact I think they are still working on it. Your going to have to talk to Skyler at Hummel Architects. I said it would be nice Jim if I could see it to make sure your needs are met as far as secondary emergency access. Until we see where those circulation patterns of the school are located, we don't know what to do. Borup: Maybe at this point we just need to put some requirements in there and let them design around it. Bowcutt: Our agreement with the school district states that we ... the seller acknowledges that the above described street, which is our Millenium Way, shall be the sole access route to the school which buyer intends to construct on the premises other than the emergency access here and after set forth. So, (inaudible) if we it we'd want an emergency access through you. Borup: So hereinafter set forth they are not specified. Meridian Planning an¢.Zoning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 12 Bowcutt: Yeah, it was emergency vehicle access if required. In order to meet uniform fire code. (Inaudible) got a lot of parking lot along here, if they need it and if that is a adequate location, then it makes sense that we do have a secondary emergency access. It would all depend on their site plan and their needs. Borup: What are saying would be secondary. Bowcutt: If you look at— Borup: Okay, the access is still from Millenium right? Bowcutt: Yes sir. Borup: So from Millenium Drive is blocked there is no secondary access. Bowcutt: This is their primary vehicular access. There is landscaping and parking areas— Borup: Okay, your saying they could come down here through the parking lot into the site. Bowcutt: Exactly. So if the school says based on our configuration we need some emergency vehicle access here or here or even link into this drive that wraps around here. That would be an option. If its needed. I have not seen the site plan. Have you seen it. You got a copy of it. Barbeiro: It was the first draft which was two months ago. Bowcutt: Oh. He said they are still working on it. I am going to try to obtain a copy hopefully before we go to the council because I'd like them to see that and I think it would be beneficial if we know what it looks like. Borup: Sounds like the mood of the City and probably the Commissioner's is that there needs to be some type of emergency secondary access. Not a vehicle access but just emergency. Barbeiro: So when building our recommendation we would include additional emergency access through this site to be determined later. Or more specific. Borup: I don't know that we need to be more specific as long as there is another access. Hatcher: One thing to take into consideration when we are discussing emergency access of the future high school site is as Becky has pointed out, if we were to bring in a second emergency access in the approximate location of the ice hockey arena or Meridian Planning anO..Zoning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 13 possibly at the apartments, first of all the apartments are a congested meandering parking lot. There is no primary means of traffic, just a private roadway system. I don't think that is a valid option. Second, bringing a secondary emergency access in and around the ice skating rink I don't think is a valid option either for the sample fact that if you have a event occurring your going to have high traffic volume there. Playing devil's advocate we have an event at the school that requires emergency vehicles and we have the ice rink letting out. Millenium and all those roads are going to be plugged. When considering an emergency access to the high school, I think we should look at the options of doing emergency break away ballards down at Raven the Subdivision down below with the public road. Borup: What is the purpose of the secondary emergency access. Hatcher: If the fire truck can't get to — Borup: And that would be because of heavy traffic or because of some accident blocking the entire roadway. I assume it would be something blocking the entire roadway and then they would need another access. Hatcher: That is correct and that is why I am saying if we (inaudible) by the ice rink, they are too cote together. Borup: Your saying something would be blocking both roads. Hatcher: I am saying if an event at the ice rink was to let out— Borup: That's just heavy traffic. That's not necessarily blocking — Hatcher: Hey, we've all been there. We know what it can really be like. One all ready looks like it is all ready a culdesac if I'm not mistaken. One of the two southern ones— we put the condition on the school district now and let them design accordingly and be done with it. Barbeiro: Couldn't we have a primary and a secondary. Hatcher: You would. Millenium would be your primary. We are talking about the secondary right now. I don't think this site is big enough to need three accesses. Borup: Okay, one of you guys had a motion earlier. Hatcher: I was trying to make a motion to close the public hearing. Norton: I second the motion. Borup: All in favor. Meridian Planning an�,Zoning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 14 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Barbeiro: Which hearing did we just close. Borup: Technically we closed— Hatcher: Can we close all of them, one through six. Borup: Technically we closed 3, cause that is the only one we opened. I think all the testimony we received was on all the applications, so — Hatcher: Mr. Chairman, I motion that we close the public hearing for Item 4,5,and 6. Borup: Let me open it. Open public hearing for Item number 4. Hatcher: I motion that we close it. Norton: I second it. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: I'd like to open Item number 5. Hatcher: I motion that we close it. Norton: I second it. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: I'd like to open Item number 6. Hatcher: I motion that we close that. Norton: I second that. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: Would you like to handle Items 1 and 2 and then go on to the others. Meridian Planning ancL?oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 15 Barbeiro: Can we do both of them at the same time. Borup: They are both two separate items, but get those two out of the way and then get into the other—or those two have all ready been closed, so— Barbeiro: If there is no discussion, I have a motion. I motion that we recommend to City Council request for annexation and zoning of 16.119 acres from RT to CG for proposed Resolution Business Park by G.L. Voigt Development to include staff comments. Hatcher: I second the motion. Borup: Any discussion. Norton: I have discussion. I believe we discussed the CG change to CN change. I'd like to make a friendly amendment to that motion that the CG be amended. Barbeiro: Thank you Commissioner Norton, you are correct and I wish to amend that to be a CN. Borup: Any other discussion. All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: Item number 2. Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman, I wish to recommend approval to City Council request for rezone of 37.64 acres from R-4 to L -O for proposed Resolution Business Park by G.L. Voigt Development with staff comments. Hatcher: Second the motion. Borup: Any discussion. All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: We have four more items. Again, comments have been concerning all of them. We have two items on the preliminary plat. No one item, sorry. Barbeiro: The discussion between myself and Commissioner Hatcher has to do with— we would like—here's what we're differing. I would like to see a development agreement between ACHD and the developer prior to any certificate of occupancy of any building. Meridian Planning ar)4Zoning Commission r� May 9, 2000 Page 16 Hatcher: What I was trying to go for on a condition of approval from this board or recommended condition of approval to City Council would be that no certificate of occupancy would be issued to any of the proposed developments of this project until Overland Road improvements have been instructed. If that means the ice rink waits until 2002 or 2003, so be it. Barbeiro: You want a 5 lane road before anything opened. That is going to put a crimp in the developer, but I think if we had a development agreement with ACHD and the developer to have 5 lanes prior to fall 2002 when the high school opened, seeing how the development would be phased, I believe that would be correct and proper with this development. I would hate to see the development held back because the 5 lanes wasn't open for then as a condition they have to ensure that it is at least 3 lanes. If they are going to go out and do 3 lanes then ACHD is going to come in tear it out. That seems like a tremendous waste of public funds. Hatcher: Absolutely. If it boils down to working things out with ACRD. Borup: Oh it does and I agree with what your saying there, but your putting a requirement on the developer that they got no control over. Barbeiro: If we have a development agreement, that is something the developer and ACHD— Borup: ACHD don't do development agreements specifically do they. Just a written agreement. Hatcher: Putting money into a slush fund for future improvement on this project is not acceptable in my opinion. That is exactly what ACHD will do. I have no opposition of the project. In fact it is a wonderful project. Overland Road can not handle any capacity that this project would generate without the required improvements. Barbeiro: So ACHD does not do development agreements so this— Borup: I don't know if that is the terminology they use. I am not sure either way. I just have not heard that used before. Hatcher: Bruce can you comment on how ACHD typically has been dealing with those issues. Freckleton: Commissioner Hatcher and members of the commission Becky was just indicating that she is aware of one that they have done with Touchmark. I know they do non -development agreements when you have a plat and your doing it in phases if you want to record the entire plat without bonding or building the other phase. That is something we would have to address with them. Meridian Planning an�LZoning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 17 Barbeiro: What would staff's recommendations be to insure that somehow we have an agreement amongst all the parties that this is going to be 5 lanes prior to a large portion of occupancy. I do not want to put a high school there without a five lane road. Hatcher: I personally don't want to stop the project. I don't want to stop construction of any of the projects on the site, but I don't want to see any of them operable until the road is done. Freckleton: My personal opinion would be unless we've got it nailed down when these things are going to happen, I would not even issue the building permit. Your looking at a can of worms if you issue a building permit and hold up occupancy without some dates being set. Hatcher: Okay so the building permit will not be issued until some sort of agreement is been reached without Ada County so that their construction schedule coincides with the projects construction schedule as deemed by the time line we are discussing. Basically what that does—I would say put one hand behind the developers back. Now we are putting both hands behind with the building permit because there is a lot of negotiations that have to go on between the developer and ACHD to meet these requirements. Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman would it be of any assistance to re -open the public hearing and get some comments from the developer on this. Hatcher: I don't think it is going to help. Borup: Have you got your thoughts together on what it is that you maybe recommending. Barbeiro: Well, now that I know there really is no such thing as a development with ACHD and my other concerns are that with the new high school, this would also stop any issuance of a building permit for a new high school to be built which would cause great problems with the school bond election coming up because of the state law requiring the school to allocate the funds for and spend the funds any certain time frame. If they can not get a building permit that may cause problems with the school bonding. Hatcher: Keep in mind as well as it was brought up by staff, school district does not need public hearing. As soon as phase one is done and Millenium Drive is built, that high school can go up. We have no control over that, so any conditions as of brought of that includes traffic, any conditions we want to impose on that high school have to be done during phase one. You could have 5000 high school kids going to high school on a 2 or 3 lane road. Borup: Do any Commissioner's remember what the going to the 3 lanes what that did to the service and what the road could handle. I am not finding that. Do you remember Meridian Planning an ,Zoning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 18 that Brad at all. What capacity was that going to add. Where I was going or at least the ACHD report is saying that the present configuration on Overland can handle a little less than 3000 additional vehicles. In the same paragraph they are saying that it would add 6. They are over 3000 short without —that's with the current road. I am not sure what the 3 lane would add to that capacity. I don't think it adds a lot of vehicle capacity. It will alleviate congestion. Hatcher: The third lane is a turning lane so it's going to allow people to stack up so that they won't be able to turn left because of on coming traffic. Borup: ACHD's statement is that a traffic signal is not warranted yet because traffic volumes are low enough. Barbeiro: That's Locust Grove and Overland, not Millenium. Borup: No, the side driveway is on Overland. I don't think they are taking the school into consideration on any of these figures. That adds a whole different aspect of it. Barbeiro: I need your assistance on this so we don't shut down the developer, we don't shut down the high school but we insure that there is a five lane road. Something that we don't seem to have a lot of control over. Borup: It is in the hand of ACRD. I don't have an answer to that. I think we can make some recommendations and let City Council look at it. Hatcher: The way we would want to word it to City Council would be that we recommend approval pending — Barbeiro: ACHD's commitment to widen that road. Hatcher: Commitment is not good enough. It has to be in writing. Barbeiro: Well, can the City work into a development agreement with ACHD as opposed to the developer. Hatcher: I don't think you want to bring the city into this. Borup: Why would the city want to. Barbeiro: We'd have a bigger gun than the developer does. Borup: To do what. Hatcher: We do? Meridian Planning ancLZoning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 19 Barbeiro: Sounded good. Borup: Lets go ahead. Lets get a recommendation drafted and put the conditions on you'd like to and --. At this point I assume your going to incorporate staff comments. Barbeiro: I have some comments within those too. Mr. Chairman, I move that we recommend approval to City Council request for preliminary plat of 17 lots on 107.06 acres in proposed L -O zone and C -N zones for proposed Resolution Business Park by G.L. Voigt Development to include staff comments making note of Item 8 on page 6 that we would recommend an easement as opposed to a separately platted buffer— Swartley: Mr. Chairman, Mr. Barbeiro what are you trying to do an easement as opposed to a buffer? Barbeiro: As I read it, the staff wanted to have a separate common lot as opposed to an easement. Swartley: Oh okay. I understand. Barbeiro: That Item number 10 that applicant will go ahead and build a privacy fence, Item number 11, the applicant will built a vehicular access over the Hunter Lateral between site B and site A, included in that the developer will put a operable gate there with cooperation of the Meridian Fire Department to prevent student crossing to get over to Locust Grove. Help me out with number 12. The applicant wanted a minimum of 35 foot landscape buffer. We are going to allow them to put a meandering sidewalk as opposed to a sidewalk right up to the easement. Page 8, item 7 allowing them to— Swartley: Mr. Barbeiro could you repeat the numbers 10 and 11 for me please. Barbeiro: Number 10 were we—the developer build the privacy fence. Number 11 in his cross access between site B and site A we put an emergency gate or a gate between the two with the cooperation of the Meridian Fire Department. This is all subject to the recommendation of ACHD and the Meridian Fire Department. Borup: That was on the motion. Hatcher: Road improvements, refresh my memory. We going to tack that onto the preliminary plat or conditional use permit. Borup: I thought you were doing it on the conditional use permit. I think they lumped it all together. The traffic is going to be generated by the conditional use permit project not by the plat. Hatcher: Okay, lets see if I got this right. Meridian Planning anA;oning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 20 Borup: ACHD's comments addressed everything all together. They combined all their comments as a project as a whole. Hatcher: The last outstanding issue I wanted to add to Commissioner Barbeiro's motion is that a written agreement between the developer and ACHD that coordinates and synchronizes construction completion of a 5 lane Overland improvement prior to the completion of phase one occupancy. The agreement be submitted to the City of Meridian prior to the issuance of a building permit. Norton: I would like to add to that motion that a revised preliminary plat to reflect the changes that have been discussed be submitted to the city prior to the City Council meeting. Borup: I think that was in the staff comments all ready. Hatcher: So you made the motion, we amended it so your going to have to second it. Barbeiro: To include their comments from Commissioner's Hatcher and Norton in the motion. Norton: I'll Second. Borup: Any other discussion. Seeing none, all in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Barbeiro: I wish to recommend approval to City Council request for conditional use permit for proposed planned commercial development consisting of multi family commercial, and LDS seminary in proposed L -O and C -N zoning by G.L. Voigt Development to incorporate all of our notes from Item number 3. Borup: This was a conceptual concept that was made mention earlier. This is a conceptual approval of the project as a whole. Barbeiro: And to include that page 10, item 11 storage areas that we waive the requirement for storage areas, page 10 item 12 that we waive the requirement for a maintenance building. Borup: Actually that should come under item 5. Barbeiro: Thank you Mr. Chairman. You are correct. (Inaudible) make the recommendation for approval for incorporating all the comments from Item number 3. Hatcher: I will second that. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 21 Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: Okay now item number 5 which is the conditional use permit for the apartment complex. Barbeiro: I wish to recommend approval to City Council request for conditional use permit for proposed 200 unit luxury apartment complex to be zoned L-0 for proposed Resolution Business Park by Desert West Properties, LLC to include all comments from Item 3 and Item 4 and from page 10 item 11 the storage areas waiving the requirement for storage areas, page 10 item 12 waiving the requirement for a maintenance building, page 11 CP apartment complex, item number 2 where staff recommends a number of units constructed in phase one be limited to a maximum of 30, make that a maximum of 140. Hatcher: I second the motion. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman I wish to recommend approval to City Council request for conditional use permit for an ice arena consisting of office, pro shop, fitness center, restaurant, locKer roorns, equipment storage and arenas zoned L-0 by Pat McKeegan to incorporate staff comments and comments from Item 3,4, and 5. Hatcher: Before this last issue is voted on, the preliminary plat did we property address the secondary emergency access to the high school. Borup: No we didn't. We spend time talking about it and then did not get it in the motion. We need to address that. We need to go back and amend the motion. Norton: I second the motion on number 6 Borup: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman, I wish to return to item number 3, the preliminary plat for the 17 lots and make an amendment to include the or note the developer will work in conjunction with the school district and arrange a secondary emergency access through their property apart from the primary access on Millenium Drive. Borup: Do you want to be more specific. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 22 Hatcher: I think you want to be more specific in location. What I just heard you say is a second emergency access through the current development. I would prefer to have a second emergency access through break away bollards down at Raven Hill. Borup: The road is all ready there. The stub street is there. It is all ready dead ended. Hatcher: It is a stub street. You'd have to dead end it with emergency bollards. Barbeiro: Is the school property also part— Borup: That is a separate lot and they will not be coming before us for the school property. Hatcher: It is not part of phase one but it is part of this development. Barbeiro: I would concur. We have a secondary access from the south through one of the two roads that are coming in. Borup: Emergency break away bollards not direct vehicle access. I think that sounds consistent with ACHD wants also. The no vehicle access is consistent. We need a whole site. Hatcher: You have the adjacent Subdivisions. Borup: What do you want, street names. There is only two streets to choose from. Two out of the two. Go over and talk to staff. Let them choose a street and it not come from the north. Bruce, do you have any idea how man times in the last five years the fire department has ever gone through the break away bollard. Okay that's what I felt. Did you hear that comment Commissioner's? Commissioner's: No. Borup: As far as Bruce has understand it the fire department has never had to use emergency access and the break away bollards. I am saying it needs to be there, but its not going to be a traffic issue. Hatcher: The one street we are talking about is East Blue Tick Street. The other road appears to be South Red Cloud Avenue. Borup: The reason I asked that question maybe for anyone living in those areas, the emergency access not be a traffic—it hasn't happened yet in this town, but like anything it is an emergency. It is there for emergency, so its there. Brad did you have some input. The amended motion was to state a southern emergency access. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 23 Barbeiro: A southern emergency access with break away bollards and not regular traffic. Borup: No specific street? Hatcher: No specific streets required. Borup: So, if they can come up with another street, that's fine. Barbeiro: Before we make the final vote, lets see if staff has anything. Borup: The motion that is in effect now is that there be an emergency access from one of the southern streets, not from the northern. We did not specify beyond that. Did you have anything to add. Hawkins Clark: Commissioner just as a suggestion that was provided which has not been considered. As far as emergency there is here on Locust Grove, as I understand the goal of your discussion as a Commission is to help get emergency access so that Overland is not the only way. Another one on Locust. One suggestion is to provide on the southern portion emergency ingress egress here on the southern portion north of this LDS church that is being built between the retail and the daycare which does access the high school site. Borup: So, that could be a third option. Hawkins Clark: Could be in terms of accessibility and response time for EMS, police, fire. Certainly an argument can be made for greater direct access as compared to going through either Los Alamitos or Raven Hill. END OF SIDE TWO Borup: to work out as far as the access for them. Barbeiro: Okay lets go ahead and say that additional access the developer will work with the school district of the options themselves for along the southwest boundaries. Commissioner Norton, does that work for you? Okay. Hatcher: I second the amended motion. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Norton: Mr. Chairman I would like to have a little more discussion on number 5 with the apartment complex. 140 apartments, does that also include the club house? I'd like to Meridian Planning anS_Zoning Commission May 9, 2000 Page 24 amend the motion then to include the club house to be constructed along with the 140 apartments. Borup: Is that different that the original or what the developer was planning. And the club house. Norton: Okay, I'll withdraw that. Borup: Anything or are we ready to move on. Let's take a short break. 7. TABLED FROM APRIL 11, 2000: REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL 77 FOOT HIGH POLE SIGN FOR CHEVRON/MCDONALDS BY EAGLE PARTNER, LLC -603 S. EAGLE ROAD.- Borup: OAD: Borup: This item was tabled to allow more information which I think you've each received in your packets. Do we have any comments, questions or discussion or anybody ready for a motion. Norton: I am ready to make a motion on number 7. 1 would like to recommend to City Council the request for modification of conditional use permit to allow additional 77 foot high pole sign for Chevron/McDonalds by Eagle Partners be denied based on using the Comprehensive Plan as a guide only and taking into consideration the following: 1. The pylon sign was not addressed in the development agreement with the city on March 9, 1999. 2. This commission made a decision in June of 1999 that a pylon sign is inappropriate. 3. A Chevron pylon sign doesn't set an appropriate tone for entering the Magic View Subdivision. 4. This pylon sign is too close proximity to a neighborhood. Hatcher: I second the motion. Borup: Discussion. Barbeiro: When we voted in June of 1999 on this issue, the two primary items that I saw were that the light from this sign would be detrimental to the neighbors and that there was presented an ordinance that only freeway frontage could have such a sign. In our last— Borup: Freeway frontage or freeway business. Barbeiro: Freeway business I believe it was. And, as I recall—do we have such an ordinance. I was unable to find such an ordinance saying that freeway business or freeway frontage is a requirement for a pylon sign. Borup: I don't believe so. WHITE, PETERSON, PRUSS, MORROW & GIGRAY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW JULIE KLEIN RscHER 200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE NAMPA OFFICE Wm. F. GiGRAY, Iii POST OFFICE BOX 1150 104 Nwm AvENUE SouTH BRENT J. JOHNSON D. Swum JOHNSON MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680-1150 POST OFFICE BOX 247 NAMPA, IDAHO 83653-0247 WILLIAM A. MORROW TEL. (208) 466-9272 WILLiAmt F. NicxoLs CHRISTOPHER S. NYE Try 208 288-2499 FAX (208) 4664405 PHiLiP A. PETERSON FAL08)288-2501 ( ) STEPHEN L. PRUSS PLEASE REPLY TO ERic S. RossmAN MERIDIAN OFFICE TODD A. ROSSMAN DAVID M. S WARTLEY TERRENCER WHITE May 30, 2000 FECEt To: Stpapff J U N _ 1 2000 Affected Property Owner(s) licant Ci OFD IM Re: Application Case No. CUP -00-016 Hearing Date: Tune 6. 2000 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Staff, Applicant and/or Affected Property Owner(s): Please note that these Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be presented to the laity Council at the public hearing on the above referenced matter by the Planningand Zoning Administrator. Due to the volume of matters which the City Council must decie, and to insure your position is understood and clear, it is important to have a consistent format by which matters are presented at the public hearings before the City Council. The City Council strongly recommends: 1. That you take time to carefully review the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, and be prepared to state your position on this application by addressing the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission; and 2. That you carefully complete (be sure it is legible) the Position Statement if You disagree with the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Position Statement form for this application is available at the City Clerk's office. It is recommended that you prepare a Position Statement and deliver it to the City Clerk prior to the hearing, if possible. If that is not possible, please present your Position Statement to the City Council at the hearing, along with eight (8) copies. The copies will be presented to the Mayor, Council, Planning and Zoning Administrator, Public Works and the City Attorney. If you are a part of a group, it is strongly recommended that one Position Statement be filled out for the group, which can be signe4 by the representative for the group. Ve01tyAttorney's truly yours, ice Iy/ i.A\ BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR 200 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX DESERT WEST PROPERTIES, LLC Applicant Case No. CUP -00-017 RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL 1. The property is located at the SE corner of Overland Road and S. Locust Grove Road, Meridian, Idaho. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is G.L. Voigt of Idaho Falls. 3. Applicant is Desert West Properties LLC of Meridian. 4. The subject property is currently zoned Ada County (R -T) and Meridian R-4. There is a current application and recommendation before the Meridian City Council for rezoning to L -O and C -N. The zoning district of L -O and C -N is defined within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-7-2. 5. The proposed application requests a conditional use permit for a 200 unit luxury apartment complex. The zoning designation within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance requires a conditional use permit be obtained for most uses including those requested by the Applicant. (Meridian City Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-8-1). RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - I CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — APARTMENT COMPLEX — DESERT WEST PROPERTIES, LLC 6. The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission recognizes that the proposed application is in compliance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 7. The use proposed within the subject application will in fact, constitute a conditional use as determined by City Policy. RECOMMENDATION 1. The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the conditional use permit as requested by the applicant, subject to the following. It should be noted that this is part of a multi -faceted requested development including annexation, rezoning, preliminary plat and 3 conditional use permits and conditional recommendations contained in AZ - 00 -004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006, CUP -00-015, CUP -00-016 and CUP -017 will apply where relevant. Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 1.1 All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site "B" (apartment complex) shall be incorporated here. 1.2 The Applicant is proposing to construct the complex in two (2) phases, with the first phase consisting of approximately 140 units and the clubhouse. Staff recommends the number of units constructed in phase 1 be limited to a maximum of one hundred and forty (140) dwelling units and that no more units be granted occupancy until Overland Road capacity is improved. 1.3 Overland Road between Locust Grove and Eagle Road is currently a two-lane, non -signalized arterial. Numerous traffic concerns have been entered into the public record regarding the capacity of both Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. Traffic was cited as one of the principal reasons for the City's denial of the proposed Sundance Apartments at RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — APARTMENT COMPLEX — DESERT WEST PROPERTIES, LLC the NW corner of Locust Grove Road and Overland Road last Fall. Dobie Engineering's traffic study lists Overland Road (east of Locust Grove Road) as having 11,230 vehicles/day in 7/98. Over the past twenty (20) months, this figure has certainly increased; especially factoring in the new homes built in Sherbrooke Hollows to the south. Dobie's study estimates 1,170 new trips/day to be generated by the apartment complex and 335 new trips/day generated by the ice arena. The study also projects a Level of Service "F" for the left -turn outs from all three Overland Road driveways until signals are installed. The study further assumes the high school, potentially slated for construction in 2001 (which is the same year as the apartment complex), will generate 3,000 trips/day and 250 peak hour trips. Overland Road is designated in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as a 5 -lane arterial with bike lanes to be constructed in 2005. Staff believes that limiting new development on the subject site, to the Ice Arena and thirty (30) apartments would facilitate a smoother transition for the neighborhoods and ease the impact on Overland Road until such time as it is widened and signalized. 1.4 All applicable Fair Housing and ADA requirements for multi -family housing must be met, including accessibility design for the ground floor units. Handicap parking shall be provided to serve the Clubhouse. 1.5 Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the condition that only the clubhouse and one hundred and forty (140) dwelling units receive occupancy until Overland Road is improved. 1.6 The requirement for storage areas is waived for this permit. 1.7 The requirement for a maintenance building is waived for this permit. ey/Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\Recommendations\CUP016Resolution.wpd RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — APARTMENT COMPLEX — DESERT WEST PROPERTIES, LLC Y 53EC0RDER 4CJAL, 10 PM 1: 2 3) MF-RDIAN CITY CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. E` CEPJTY 1 00006 3004 AN ORDINANCE FINDING THAT CERTAIN LAND LIES CONTIGUOUS OR ADJACENT TO THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO; AND FINDING THAT THE OWNER HAS MADE A REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION IN WRITING TO THE COUNCIL; AND THAT SAID LAND BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AND ZONING DESIGNATED NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT (C -N); AND DECLARING THAT SAID LAND, BY PROPER LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BE A PART OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, ORDERS OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ADD SAID PROPERTY TO THE OFFICIAL MAPS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO; AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN TO FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE AREAS TO BE ANNEXED WITH ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AUDITOR, TREASURER AND ASSESSOR, AND THE STATE TAX COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, PURSUANT TO IDAHO CODE SECTION 50-223 AND SECTION 63-2215. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. FINDINGS: That the following described land is contiguous and adjacent to the City of Meridian, Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for annexation to the City of Meridian, Idaho, by the owner of said Property to -wit: ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ -00-004) - 1 ,"_N A parcel of land including a portion of the right-of-way of Locust Grove and Overland Road, lying in the NW 1/4 of Section 20, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Section 20, T. 3N., R. IE., B.M., the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; Thence S 00'34'14" W 970.53 feet along the west line of the NW 1/4 to a point; Thence N 89°59'19" E 849.95 feet to a point on the centerline of the Hunter Lateral; Thence N 05'29'17" W 140.30 feet along said centerline to a point; Thence N 16°14'08" W 216.98 feet along said centerline to a point; Thence N 18°27'39" W 470.81 feet along said centerline to point; Thence N 07°06'04" W 175.77 feet along said centerline to a point on the centerline of Overland Road, which is also the north line of said NW 1/4; Thence N 89'52'19" W 595.39 feet along said north line to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; Said parcel of land contains 16.119 acres more or less. SECTION 2: That the above-described real property be, and the same is hereby annexed and made a part of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. SECTION 3: That the real property herein by this ordinance annexed to the City of Meridian hereinabove described shall be zoned Neighborhood Business District (C -N). SECTION 4: That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ -00-004) - 2 ter, Will Berg From: jansyl@micron.net Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 9:07 AM 11 To: bergw@ci.meridian.id.us Subject: Fw: G.L. Voigt Development of Resolution Business Park City Council ; U U Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 5:39 PM CITE' OF MERli; Subject: G.L. Voigt Development of Resolution Business Park City Council To: Meridian City Council Re: G.L. Voigt Development Mr. Berg, Tammy DeWeerd suggested I send the following information to you in the event I am unable to attend the 6/6/00 meeting regarding G. L. Voigt and the development of Resolution Business Park. I currently reside in the Summerfield Subdivision at the NE corner of Ustick and North Locust Grove in the city of Meridian. This subdivision was developed by G.L. Voigt ( a few phases were not, but I am addressing the ones that were). The developer was responsible for the perimeter fence. A fence was erected, however the section on Locust Grove is failing over after only three years. The developer was responsible for the pressurized irrigation system. A trouble -prone pooly designed system was installed causing several homeowners unneccessary expenses. The developer was responsible for drainage in the subdivsion. Houses were built such that water drains to the adjacent house to the rear. No drainage was installed between the'park' and the adjacent lots causing the park to drain to the adjacent properties. Drainage problems occur in the street storm drains, they appear to be under -sized. The deveoper was responsible for each lot being built. There is one home in Summerfield that has been under construction for 6 years. The developer was supposed to provide a common area 230 x 140, large enough to accomodate a soccer field. I still haven't come across that yet. If the Council decides to approve the development of Resolution Park by G. L.. Voigt what, if any, checks and balances will there be to assure that: a) the project won't fall apart in 3 years b) quality design will be used c) drainage problems will be addressed and resolved prior to construction d) the project will be completed e) the developer will provide all that has been agreed upon Thank you, Jan Sylvester 1775 E. Summerheights Drive Meridian, Idaho 6/6/00 ►�"1 and area maps as well as the official zoning maps, comprehensive plan and all official maps depicting the boundaries of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 5: The zoning designation set forth in Section 3 of this ordinance is subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Development Agreement by and between the City of Meridian and the owner of the land described in Section 1 dated the day of ;�&I, , 2000, and that the uses are to be developed under the planned unit development process and conditional use permit process. SECTION 6: All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 7: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. SECTION 8: The Clerk of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a map prepared in a draftsman manner plainly and clearly designating the boundaries of the City of Meridian, including the lands herein annexed, with the following officials of the County of Ada, State of Idaho, to -wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho, all in compliance with Idaho Code §63- 2215 and §50-223. ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ -00-004) - 3 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of U-9- , 2000. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this Sf" day of t, - , 2000. YOR wil; I'M Lp uzuef" za STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada. On this / s day of , 2000, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for laid State, personally appeared ROBERT D��-��,, CORRIE and h �� a known tome to be the Mayor and 0 6"erl� of the CITY of Mendian, Idaho, Sand who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL)g•*,* oft Alt }• s G L* PUBy1 00 MSG\Z:\A c at1'4iPAi� '•.._. E Of 61k, i"' V'L�� NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO RESIDING AT: MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:// -a.7 --e,/ Business Park AZ RZ CUP PP\AZOrd ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ -00-004) - 4 CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To: The Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor of Ada County, and The State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Cleric, of the City of Meridian, Ada State of Idaho, do hereby certify that the attached copy of Ordinance No. U County, passed by the City Council of the City of Meridian, on the �r day of /i, 2000, is a true and correct copy of the original of said document which is in the care, custody and control of the City Cleric of the City of Meridian. STATE OF IDAHO, ) ss. County of Ada, ) s� On this day of , in the year 2000, before me, a Notary Public, appeared � known or identified to me to be the City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Idaho that executed the said instrument, and acknowledged to me that he e;; � d.'T %kme on behalf of the City of Meridian. �/.., "�qT Ak y :. p tT 1 Notary Public for Idaho •. J' ,g 4TE DI Commission Expires: _a msg\Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\Resolution Business Park AZ RZ CUP PP\CertificationOFC(erkOrd CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AZ -00-004 ** TX CONFIRMS ' REPORT *w. DATE TIME TO/FROM 04 07/26 11:42 PUBLIC WORKS 33 East Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 Ph: 208.888-4433 Fax: 208-888-4218 rem AS OF JUL 26 'E :43 PAGE.01 CITY OF MERIDIAN MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD# STATUS OF --S 01'30" 007 133 OK City of Meridian City Clerk's Office TO: Steve O'Brien From: Shelby Fax: Pages: 7 Phone: we: 07/26/00 Re: Ordinance for Tuesday, August cc: 1It Meeting 0 Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply 0 Please Recycle Hello, Steve. I need this Ordinance map for this Tuesday's meeting on the 11+. Sorry for the short notice. Also, Will asked # there's any way that it could be black ink rather than the green; it doesn't seem to copy as well. Thanks so muchll June 15, 2000 AZ 00-004 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 20, 2000 1 APPLICANT G.L. Voigt / Overland LLC ITEM NO. REQUEST Findings - AZ of 16.119 acres from R -T to C -G for proposed Resolution Business Park - south of Overland Road and east of Locust Grove Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS See attached Findings Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. WHITE, PETERSON, PRUSS, MORROW & GIGRAY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW JULIE KLEIN FISCHER PHILIP A. PETERSON Wm. F. GIORAY, III STEPHEN L. PRUSS BRENT JOHNSON ERIC S. ROSSMAN D. SAMUEL JOHNSON TODD A. ROSSMAN WILLIAM A. MORROW DAVID M. SWARTLEY WILLIAM F. NICHOLS• TERRENCE R. WHITE" CHRISTOPHER S. NYE 200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE, SUITE 31 POST OFFICE BOX 1150 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680-1150 TEL (208) 288-2499 FAX (208) 288-2501 Email via Internet @ wfg@wppmg.com 'ALSO ADMITTED IN OR -ALSO ADMITTED IN WA June 12, 2000 William G. Berg, Jr., City Cleric MERIDIAN CITY HALL 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 NAMPA OFFICE 104 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH POST OFFICE BOX 247 NAMPA, IDAHO 83653-0247 TEL (208) 466.9272 FAX (208) 466-4405 PLEASE REPLY TO MERIDIAN OFFICE PtFjCE-1VED J U N t 5 2000 CITY OF 1`Y ERMIAN Re: OVERLAND 16, L.L.C. / ANNEXATION AND ZONING FINDINGS, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, RESOLUTION AND CERTIFICATE OF CLERK CASE NO. AZ -00-004 Dear Will: Please find enclosed the original of the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING prepared as per instructions from the Council meeting of June 6, 2000, and which are on the agenda for June 20, 2000. I have also attached the originals of the Resolution and Certificate of the Cleric for the Development Agreement for owner/developer 7 s signature. I have also attached hereto the Development Agreement for the above matter. After the Council meeting of June 20, 2000, if Council approves the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the above matter, then the Findings will need to be attached to the four Development Agreements as Exhibit "B". June 9, 2000 Page 2 After the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order Granting Application for Annexation and Zoning have been adopted, please submit the Development Agreement to the owner/developer for signature. Very truly y c Wm. F. Nic ols msg/Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\Resolution Business Park AZ RZ CUP PP\FFCL and DevAgtClk.ltr RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300' (PP) LOCUST GROVE PROPERTIES LLC KENAI PARTNERS LLC 1109 MAIN ST SUITE #500 6223 N DISCOVERY WAY BOISE ID 83702-0000 BOISE ID 83713-0000 1545 S LOCUST GROVE RD E OVERLAND RD VAN AUKER RONALD W JOINT SCHOOL DIST #2 3084 E LANARK 911 N MERIDIAN RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN ID 83642-2241 2600 E OVERLAND RD E OVERLAND RD PECK CURTIS D & KIM L CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LDS 6149 N MEEKER PL STE 250 50 E NORTH FLOOR 22ND BOISE ID 83713-1568 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150-0002 2400 E OVERLAND RD S LOCUST GROVE RD HOWELL WILLARD & ANGELA COULTER KENNETH D & PO BOX 848 COULTER CONNIE EAGLE ID 83616-0000 3889 BOWMAN RD 2200 E OVERLAND RD EMMETT ID 83617-9713 2270 E OVERLAND RD E OVERLAND RD CONTRACTORS EQUIP SUPLY CO INC SCHMIDT RICHARD A & 2000 E OVERLAND SCHMIDT KAREN MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 1770 CHAROLAIS DR MERIDIAN ID 83642-4324 PLAYGROUND INC 4098 N JULLION WAY WELSH STANLEY W & BOISE ID 83704-2763 WELSH REGINA L 1780 E OVERLAND RD 1866 CHAROLAIS DR MERIDIAN ID 83642-6624 JE DOUBLE D LLC 4601 N FIVE MILE WELCH PATRICIA ANN BOISE ID 83713-0000 1931 CHAROLAIS DR 1822 E OVERLAND RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-6625 OVERLAND 16 LLC BLACK MICHAEL L & 6223 N DISCOVERY WAY BLACK LISA L BOISE ID 83713-0000 1867 CHAROLAIS DR E OVERLAND RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-6625 VOIGT GARY L AND GROVES C R & STEINBRONER F & M TRUSTEES R L AND BASS ROBERT & DANA 1835 CHAROLAIS DR 1908 JENNIE LEE DR MERIDIAN ID 83642-6625 IDAHO FALLS ID 83404-6159 1965 E OVERLAND RD FLEMING JAMES M & BURNHAM JACK LEE & FLEMING ANITA G BURNHAM CAROL ANN 1771 E CHAROLAIS DR 2236 S TAGISH WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642-6625 MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 SPENCE MARIANNE AND HOLTON HOMES INC SNODGRASS DONNA JEAN 16299 FRANKLIN 2036 E BLUE TICK ST NAMPA ID 83687-0000 MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 1986 E GRIFFON ST ARNOLD GREG G NOBLE ROGER J JR & ARNOLD THERESA R NOBLE MARY ANN 2002 E BLUE TICK ST 1964 E GRIFFON ST MERIDIAN ID 00008-3642 MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 HOWARD KLETE A & MONTROSE TODD L & HOWARD SHAUNA J MONTROSE NAOMI K 1974 E BLUE TICK ST 2268 S TAGISH WAY MERIDIAN ID 83634-0000 MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 GREENER LAURA L & FOGG STACEY GREENER ROBERT 2290 S TAGISH WAY 1950 E BLUE TICK ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN ID 83642-5910 SMITH JODY G & TRASKA JOHN P & SMITH MISTY M TRASKA JUELIE A 1997 E GRIFFON ST 1928 E BLUE TICK ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 DECKER STANLEY R & CARPENTER GAIL P & DECKER TAMMY L CARPENTER VICKI L 1973 E GRIFFON ST 1900 E BLUETICK ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 RENNA EDWARD A & PRICE TRAVIS & SUSAN RENNA TARI M 1878 E BLUETICK 2312 S TAGISH WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 ROGERS JOHN M & ME DIXIE L <CIROGERS 33 E ID1985 E BLUE TICK ME631 MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 KYNASTON DEAN J MICONE PHILIP V & KYNASTON ANGELA J MICONE PATRICIA A 1963 E BLUE TICK ST 2330 S TAGISH WAY MERIDIAN ID 00008-3642 MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 7n COLEMAN MICHAEL T & CAMERON MICHAEL J & COLEMAN MARILYN F CAMERON TEENA L 2049 E PARTY JET ST 1632 S LABRADOR PL MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 ROHM RODNEY AMOS & REDENBO NEWTON C & ROHM DARLA M REDENBO CHRISTI L 2027 E PARTY JET RD 1654 S LABRADOR PL MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 HALL KOREY A & DROLLINGER KELLI A & HALL TIFFANY L DROLLINGER SCOTT 2471 BRANDYS JEWEL AVE 1670 S LABRADOR PL MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 WYMAN J D & REMKES KARL B & BREEZI WYMAN JOLENE L 1700 S LABRADOR PL 2488 S BRANDYS JEWEL AVE MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 SPOMER MICHAEL W & VIERTEL EUGENE K & CURTRIGHT TIMOTHY & VIERTEL JEANNETTE L CURTRIGHT JUDY 1728 S LABRADOR PL 2320 E THREE BARS DR MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 6223 N DISCOVERY WAY SUITE #100 LUKE WILLIAM A & GEHRING JEFF D & DUNCAN TERRI GEHRING LAURIE H 4240 FORTUNA WAY 1550 E PEACOCK ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 83719-0974 MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 2470 S TAGISH WAY 1551 E PEACOCK ST FARRE L ART V JOHNSON GREG B DUNN PHILIP R PO BOX 344 2292 EAST THREE BARS DR MERIDIAN ID 83680-0344 MERIDIAN ID 83642-4562 1572 E PEACOCK ST VARGASON RICK D CONRAD GERALD L & 2244 E THREE BARS DR CONRAD JOANNE C MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 2181 RIBIER DR MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 SPOMER MICHAEL W & 1594 E PEACOCK ST SPOMER VALERIE A 2494 S TAGISH WAY SPORTSMAN POINTE HOA MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 PARK POINTE REALTY 6223 N DISCOVERY WAY SUITE #100 LUKE WILLIAM A & BOISE ID 83713-0000 LUKE PHILLIS J S LOCUST GROVE RD 2124 E THREE BARS DR MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 MACKENZIE DON 1551 E PEACOCK ST FARRE L ART V MERIDIAN ID 83680-0000 32 W PROSPECTORS DR CASCADE ID 83611-0000 1695 S LOCUST GROVE RD BURKETT BOB F & BURKETT KATHERINE A 1573 E PEACOCK ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 NELSON STEVEN J & NELSON JANET L 1595 E PEACOCK ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 AUSTIN ROBERT D & TERESA A TRS AUSTIN R D & T A TRUSTEES 1834 S LABRADOR PL MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 ROBINSON JUSTIN & AMY B 1564 E PUFFIN CT MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 HINCKLEY N E & BUCHAK SUSAN C 1582 E PUFFIN CT MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 CARICO SCOTT & CARICO MELISSA L 1581 E PUFFIN CRT MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 PERRY RONALD R & DEANNA L 1886 S LABRADOR PL MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 PAFFUMI ROBERT D & PAFFUMI ANGELA R 1563 E PUFFIN CRT MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 COMPTON T NEAL & COMPTON SUSAN E 1574 E MASTIFF ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 JACKSON LARRY E & NASH JACKSON TONI L 1598 E MASTIFF ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 MOONEY CRAIG J & BAIRD LISA ANN 1575 E MASTIFF ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 KNOWLES TODD A & KNOWLES LISA O 1597 E MASTIFF ST MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 \U ENGINEERS / PLANNERS / SURVEYORS March 22, 2000 Mr. Brad Hawkins -Clark Mr. Bruce Freckleton City of Meridian 200 E. Carlton, Suite 201 Meridian, Idaho 83642 1800 West Overland Road Boise, Idaho 83705 — 3142 Voice (208) 344-9700 Fax (208) 345-2950 E-mail briggs@micron.net Re: Resolution Plaza (Annexation, Rezone, Preliminary Plat, PUD & Conditional Use Applications) Dear Brad and Bruce: This letter is in response to staff comments dated March 20, 2000 General Comments: 1. We are in agreement. 2. The phasing information is correct. 3. The School District information is correct. 4. We would like more detailed information on transportation management plans. General Requirements : 1. Internal irrigation and drainage ditches will be piped. The Hunter Lateral adjoining the west boundary of the Voigt property will be piped. The section of the adjoining Hunter Lateral which abuts the Meridian School District property will be the responsibility of the District if piping is required for Lot 1, Block 1. 2. A septic system and two wells presently exist on the property. The septic system and residential well will be removed per City Ordinance. The second well was used for agricultural purposes. Weare exploring the possible use of the well as a secondary pressure irrigation source. 3. The applicant will comply. 4. The applicant will comply. 5. The applicant will provide a drainage plan. A drainage ditch traverses the subject property. The ditch receives run-off from the property. We may explore approval to discharge the pre - development flow. 6. The applicant will comply. 7. The applicant will comply. 8. The applicant will comply. 9. The applicant will comply. 0101\CityMer Hawkins -Clark Response.ltr BRIGGS ENG/NEE�.tNG� Inc. 1800 W. Overland Road — BoiseJdaho 83705 — (208) 344-9700 Annexation and Zoning Requirements: (File AZ -00-004) 1. Acceptable. 2. Staff's recommendation for Neighborhood Commercial (CN) zoning is acceptable since the anticipated uses would be allowed within the CN designation. 3. We are in agreement. 4. The applicant will comply and enter into a development agreement. Rezone Requirements :(File R2-00-003) 1. We are in agreement. 2. We are in agreement. 3. We are in agreement. 4. The applicant will comply and enter into a development agreement. Preliminary Plat General Comments: (File PP -00-006) 1. The subdivision name Resolution Subdivision has been approved by the Ada County Engineer. The Street Name Committee has reviewed the proposed street name and has issued an evaluation and approval. 2. The applicant will comply. 3. The applicant will comply. Preliminary Plat Requirements: (File PP -00-006) 1. The applicant will comply. 2. The applicant will comply. 3. The applicant will comply. 4. The applicant will provide pressure irrigation to all lots with the exception of Lot 1, Block 1 (Meridian School District lot). We have contacted the School District concerning participation in a joint pump station. However, if the District believes financial participation is premature, since their irrigation needs are unknown at this time. We will proceed with an independent station. 5. The applicant intends to design and construct the pressure irrigation facilities to Nampa Meridian Irrigation District Standards. The system will be owned and maintained by Nampa Meridian Irrigation District with approval by the District Board. An agricultural well exists on the G. L. Voigt parcel. The well was historically used for a dairy. We intend to utilize the well as a secondary source if approval from Idaho Department of Water Resources can be obtained. 6. The applicant will delineate the NMID easement for the Hunter Lateral on the plat. No other irrigation easements exist on the subject properties. 0�7. The applicant will comply. 1 8. The applicant intends to provide landscape easements along Locust Grove and Overland Roads. An association will be formed to govern perimeter landscaping. 9. The applicant will comply. 0101\CityMer Hawkins -Clark Response. ltr BRIGGS ENG/NEE�, /DC, 1800 W. Overland Road — Boise,.Who 83705 —(208) 344-9700 10. The developer of the apartment complex believes a fence along their western boundary is necessary as a buffer and for security purposes. Interconnection can be accomplished with pedestrian pathways and (1) vehicular connection as requested in Condition No. 11. The applicant will pipe the Hunter Lateral as requested by staff. 11. A vehicular connection between Site A & B could be accomplished from the driveway between building 7 & 8. If the daycare building size were reduced and the driveway angles north to intersect just above the traffic circle. c,'� MP rt 17,. The applicant willcomply. pp U � / 13. The private road functions as a joint private access between Lot 8 & 6, Block 1 and Millennium Way. This access could be accomplished with an easement or cross access agreement for a driveway. The applicant did not intend the driveway to be �fonstructed with curbs, gutter and sidewalk. CUP (PUDhCommelcial)Requirements: (File CUP -00-017) .e^ 1. The applicant understands. 2. The applicant understands the approval is conceptual and future uses will require it� specific conditional use approval. The staff and commission must understand the term conceptual. Final development plans will most likely reflect minor deviations from the concept. 3. The applicant is in agreement. 4. The applicant will comply with the requirements of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance as follows: Sections 12-6-4, 12-6-6, 12-6-7 & 12-6-8-13. The applicant disagrees with the requirements of Section 12-6-8-A (1, 2 & 3). (1) The multi -family project applicant indicates the parking of any type of recreational vehicle will be prohibited. Any resident with RV's will need to store the vehicles at a public storage facility offsite. Therefore, there is no necessity to provide a storage area. OV/(2) The applicant opposes the recommendation to provide one additional parking space for every three dwelling units in addition to the required 2 spaces per dweling unit. This section is not a mandate since it refers to the word "may" not shall or should. The applicant for the apartment complex has provided two (2) parking spaces per dwelling unit as specified in Section 11-13-15-B of the Meridian Ordinance. The standard of two spaces per unit is universal in most jurisdictions. The applicant has also provided attached garages which enhances the aesthetics of the project with less hard surface areas. Driveways (tandem parking) to the garages provides additional parking for guests. 0\1/ (3) No maintenance building is proposed with the multi -family or commercial project. The applicants intend to contract with a landscape company for maintenance of common areas and landscaping. Therefore, this requirement should 0101\CityMer Hawkins -Clark Response. ltr BRIGGS InC. 1800 W. Overland Road — Boise.ldaho 83705 — (208) 344-9700 be deleted. 5. A colored site/landscape plan and multiple colored elevations of proposed structures was submitted with the applications. The applicants will need specifics concerning additional information required under Section 12-6-4. It is the applicant's belief that Section 12-6-4 has been satisfied. 6. The applicant is in agreement. 7. The applicant disagrees with the parking requirement of Site B (Apartment Complex). Staff indicates a requirement of 2.3 spaces/dwelling unit. The Ordinance mandates (2) spaces/du. Staff has never required parking in excess of 2/unit on any previous applications processed by Briggs Engineering. I believe this recommendation is excessive and adds to paved areas at the expense of landscaping/common areas. The Ordinance does not mandate anything beyond (2) spaces/unit. The parking required condition should be revised to reflect "400". The Apartment Complex was designed with 401 parking spaces (garages and open parking) to meet the Ordinance requirement of 2 spaces/unit. The tandem parking (driveways in front of attached garages) was considered excess, yet was referenced on the site plan. Mr. McKeegan, the architect for the Ice Arena believes the parking provided (278 spaces) will be under utilized most of the time. (See Mr. McKeegan's letter attached.) Customers of the rink will have the ability to park in adjoining lots during heavy peak hours for the rink. We believe a minor amount of over—flow parking is reasonable. Please refer to the letter from Patrick McKeegan dated March 21, 2000 for additional information on the Ice Arena's parking needs and hours of operation. The applicant will revise the site plan and remove the three rows of parking stalls which back directly into the access driveways on Site A. 8. The applicant will comply with landscaping requirements for parking lots. 9. The applicant is in agreement and will delineate the necessary cross access easements on the final plat for lots which may share private access driveways. 10. The applicant will comply. 11. The applicant for the Apartment Complex will prohibit the parking of recreational vehicles within the complex. 12. The maintenance of common areas will be contracted with a lawn care company. Therefore, there is no practical need for a maintenance building for any of the proposed developments. 13. A site plan was sent to Meridian Sanitary Services for their review and comment. A meeting has been scheduled with Bill Gregory, Meridian Sanitary Services on March 22, 2000 to obtain recommendations for trash enclosure locations. The applicant will comply. 14. See letter from Patrick McKeegan concerning hours of operation for the Ice Arena. We agree that hours of operation are important in order to coexist with existing residential development and the proposed multi -family development. 15. An easement for a possible future bus stop could be provided on the plat. 0101\CityMer Hawkins -Clark Response. ltr BRIGGS ENG/NEE (NG, //7C. 1800 W Overland Road — BoiseA_a o 83705 — (208) 344-9700 The inclusion of bicycle racks within the development is acceptable. 16. The applicant is in agreement. 17. The applicant proposes the Y2K Lane as a private driveway. The applicant does not intend to construct this as a public street with curb, gutter and sidewalk. CUP (Apartment Complex) Requirements: (File CUP -00-017) 1. The applicant agrees, with the exception of those conditions which we have documented our opposition. 2. The applicant disagrees with the limitation of the apartment complex to 30 units. It is not economically feasible to construct the necessary infrastructure (i.e. clubhouse, pool, sewer, water, roadways & parking) to accommodate 30 units. (See letter from Desert West, LLC.) It is our desire to encourage ACHD to consider a private/public effort to improve Overland Road. 3. The applicant will comply with ADA requirements. CUP ("The Pond" Ice Arena) Requirements: (File CUP -00-015) 1. The applicant agrees with the exception of those conditions which we have documented opposition. 2. The applicant will comply. (See Patrick McKeegan's letter dated March 21, 2000.) Sincerely, BRIG S ENGINEERING, I Becky L. Bowcutt Land Use Planner BLB:fc 0101\CityMer Hawkins -Clark Response. Itr MAR -21-00 TUE 15:41 MCKEEGAN.ARCHITECTS 208 424 8609 P.01 Patrick _ MgKeegan Architects 419 S. 8th Street, Suite B Boise, Idaho 83702-7157 208.424.8608 Fax 208.424.8609 www.mckeeganarch.com March 21, 2000 Becky Bowcutt Briggs Engineering 1800 W. Overland road Boise, ID 83705 Re: Pond Ice Arena CUP Report Response Project No. 99052 Dear Becky, I have reviewed Meridian's comments and am pleased with the positive response. My response to their comments on the Ice Facility follows. For clarity I have indicated the City's page and paragraph number. Page 3, Item 4. Transportation Management Plan. We support the concept and would participate in a development wide plan. Page 3, Item 5: Drainage. Will there be a development wide drainage plan or will we be required to maintain all drainage on our parcel? Our civil engineer has indicated that we can accommodate our drainage runoff on our parcel. Page 4, Item 2: C -N zoning. I assume that since staff has not stated the Ice Rink use is not allowed in the C -N zoning that it is. We have no problem with the designation for our use. Page 5, Item 4 and Page 6 Item 5: Pressurized irrigation system. Will this be a development wide system or will each parcel be responsible for its needs? Page 6, Item 9: Perimeter fencing. Will the fencing be installed by the development or are we responsible for the portion abutting our proposed lot? Page 7 Item 2. Conceptual approval only. It was Mr. Smith's understanding that our application was for CU approval of our project also. When is the earliest we could apply for our CU? Page 8, Item 5. Colored rendering. I thought we furnished one with our previous package to you. I have enclosed another for this submission. MAR -21-00 TUE 15:42 MCKEEGAN.ARCHITECTS 208 424 8609 P-02 Page 9, Item 7: Additional detail on operations. Mr. Smith has conducted focus groups to determine the feasibility for this facility and what the communities needs are for ice related recreation. He is also actively involved in the local recreational hockey leagues. Much of the information is proprietary business information but I can summarized our plans as follows: There is a need in the area for additional ice facilities. Ice World is currently running at full capacity and cannot support the current need or anticipated growth in hockey. Many of the adult participants work non-traditional hours because of the nature of the major employers (Micron, HP, etc.) running multiple shifts. There is a need for a facility that will provide around the clock ice facilities_ Our facility will be open 24 hours but except for a few peak periods during the day will not require anywhere near the parking that is being requested. For example if both sheets were being used by four teams there would be approximately 64 persons on the ice. During open recreational skating there might be as many as 104 persons on one or both sheets. Open recreational skating will be scheduled after school and during the early evenings when the sheets are not scheduled for practice. The majority of the time the ice will be scheduled by teams (16 players plus coaches) for practice on a rotating basis. We anticipate once a month having tournaments or other events that would require the full parking count. These would usually occur during the weekend or evenings when the office parking would not be used. We believe the parking we have provided will be underutilized most of the time and that the shared use for the additional 8 seats is reasonable. We had hoped the City would allow more shared parking so the total development parking lots would not need to be so large. Page 10, Item 15_ Bicycle racks. They will be provided at our facility. Page 11, Item 2. HC parking spaces. 5 additional HC parking spaces will be designated If you have any questions, or need more information, please call. Sincerely, Patrick McKeegan Architects /Patrick Mc egan Principal Architect MAR -21-2000 15:46 20B 424 8609 P.02 03/22/2000 08:32 2088989527 SELECT DEVELOPMENT PAGE 02 Desert West Properties, LLC 3/21/00 Planning & Zoning Commission / Mayor & City Council City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Comments on the submittal review comments for the 200 unit Luxury Apartment Complex by Desert West Properties, LLC Dear, Commission and council With regard to conditions proposed in the March 20t6 2000 review of our application for a Conditional Use Permit (Pile CUP -00-015) We would like to address the items that pertain to the 200 Unit Luxury Apartment complex. Preliminary Plat Requirements (Pile PP -00-006) Item 10: It is the preference of the applicant to pipe the hunter lateral as well as construct the 6' fence. It is our opinion that the perimeter fence is necessary to maintain the level of security and cleanliness that our clientele will expect from a facility of this caliber. We ask the City council to allow us to provide this important amenity. Thank you. item 11: The applicant would be agreeable to this condition provided that we are able to limit the traffic into the complex to residents only, thereby protecting the project from drive threw traffic that would be detrimental to the peace and tranquility of our secured environment. CUP (PUD/Commercial) Requirements (Pile CUP -00-017) Item 7: The applicant believes that there has been an error in the calculation of the required parking_ When the tandem parking spaces are deducted from the total of the proposed parking, 401 spaces remain. It is our understanding that there are 2 stalls required for each of the 200 units equaling 400 stalls. Item 8: It is our intent to comply with this request fully_ Item 11: It is the intent of the applicant to restrict parking to automobiles and light duty trucks able to fit into one stall. Storage of boats, campers, motorhomes, trailers and vehicles that are inoperable or not used regularly will not be allowed and the owner will be required to secure suitable storage elsewhere. 03/22/2000 08:32 2088989527 SELECT DEVELOPMENT Item 12: The applicant will be subcontracting maintenance and grounds keeping to a qualified professional. Item 13. the applicant intends to conform to this request in full. CUP (Apartment Complex) requirements (File CUP -00-017) Item 2: The applicant has concluded that it is not economically feasible to limit the number of units that can be built in phase I, and requests that the council delete such a requirement, as it would interfere with the ability of the business to be profitable. We arc aware of the traffic problem on Overland road, however, it is our belief that by developing this site fully and paying the ACHD impact fees we will be closer to funding the expansion than if development is drawn out and funding is not as available. In addition, the 1,170 trips per day estimated by Dobie Engineering is somewhat insignificant when compared to the traffic generated by the High school and other commercial enterprises. We appreciate responsibility that you bear and thank you for the service you render in behalf of this community. Sincerely, The Principles of Desert West Property LLC Desert WcA Properties, U.C. PO Box 1030 Mendal, Idaho 83642 (208)898.0800 Fwx.(308)898-9527 PAGE 03 NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. on June 6, 2000, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of G.L. Voigt Development / Overland, LLC for annexation and zoning of 16.119 acres from R -T to C -G for proposed Resolution Business Park which is generally located south of Overland Road and east of Locust Grove Road; Furthermore, the applicant requests a rezone of 37.64 acres from R-4 to L -O and a Conditional Use Permit for commercial development consisting of multi -family, office and seminary. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 15th day of May, 2000 PUBLISH May 19th and June 2"d, 2000 WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CITY CLERK *1\j�l��llt9tltt/t��/' � O 9 SEAL _ ��ir>>rrta; raaeelat�� 0 A i E BEAGLE ST BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. BRIGGS (206) 3449700 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD BOISE, IDAHO 83705 E PUFFIN CT N MERIDIAN CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY , L C -G PROPOSED JW '\\ R1 DR 0 _1 300 1 600 Feet PROPOSED ANNEXATION & REZONE REVISION RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20, T.3N., R. 1E., B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO SHEET OF 1 DESIGN DRAFT SCALE DATE I DWG. NO. BK13 1"=300 1 02/01/00 0101 \0101 APR r'v: City of Meridian; 2088886854 May -15-00 4:52PM; Page 1j2 200 E. Carlton Ave., Ste. 201 LlwWlen, ID 83642 Phan& (208)884-5533 CITY OF 71 a Fax (208)888.6854 Planning& Zoning RECEIVEj) MAY 15 2000 To; Becky BOMWU From rya Day CITY OF MERIDIAN F'90c 376-8713 Datm 5/15/00 CITY CLERK OFFICE Phom Pte= 2 (Inducting cover) R.: Resolution Bus, Park CC: W1,11 6erq 8$g- q 21$ 0 Urgwd m For RwAaw 0 PtOmse Counhad O Please Rw+y ❑ Please Recycle MAY 15 '00 16:52 2088886854 PAGE.01 MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING MARCH 22 2000 A special meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Chairman Keith Borup. MEMBERS PRESENT: Keith Borup, Thomas Barbeiro, Sally Norton. OTHERS PRESENT: Brad Hawkins Clark, David Swartley, Will Berg. Borup: Good evening ladies and gentlemen. Weil like to convene this special -meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission. This is a special meeting because we felt because of the magnitude of the project had deserved a meeting by itself. There will be 6 public hearings tonight. Essentially all relate to the same development. i would like to mention that the Planning and Zoning Commission is a adversary panel essentially. We make recommendations to the City Council and the City Council is the one that can take our recommendations and then they will act on it. Basically the procedure will be that the staff will give a report on each application public hearing. The applicant will have an opportunity to present their project. After the applicant, we take public testimony and finally the applicant will have final summary comments. Before we start, we'd like to go ahead and take roll call. We do have a quorum but we are missing a couple Commissioner's. We have Commissioner Norton, Commissioner Barbeiro, Commissioner-Borup, with Richard Hatcher and Kent Brown absent. Having said that, the other item I might mention. Because of the complexity of this project and to try to keep things straight in our mind and probably benefit of all of you, we will essentially be handling testimony on each public hearing separately. Often times we will take testimony on both annexation -and zoning and conditional use permit and -maybe a preliminary plat that all have to do with the same project. Since there are several different projects involved here, we thought it be less confusing and to make the evening run smoother if we take testimony on the specific item that the hearing is on. We'd like to proceed with that. If -someone forgets about that when they are up here, I will try to remind you. Having said that, we would like to start with the staff report. Let me open the public hearing first. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 16.119 ACRES FROM RT TO CG FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPN LENT/OVERLAND, LLC—OVERLAND AND LOCUST GROVE ROADS: Hawkins Clark: Good evening Commissioner's. Just as a general comment to remind the Commission and those present this entire area in question here was changed on the Comprehensive -Plan this last summer. It was previously designated as a single family, residential and the designation in the land use map was changed to a mixed plan use. That was a separate application and process that was made this last summer. This application here on the screen before you pertains to this cross hashed area which is Meridian Planning and Zr ig Commission Special Meeting March 22, 2000 Page 2 the a little more than 16 acres immediately at the southeast corner. We just request that our staff comments be incorporated. We are recommending that -the requested zone of CG be down zoned to a CN. Essentially all of the uses that are requested are permitted in the CN, neighborhood commercial. Other than that, I don't think there is anything else on the annexation application other than what is in the staff report that want to bring up. Thanks. Borup: Oh your done. That was quick. Commissioner's, any questions? Norton: I just have one question for Brad. The change from CG to CN, I understand that the CN zoning would not allow auto repairs, service station, hotels, truck stops, heavy equipment sales and auto sales. Is that correct? Hawkins Clark: That's correct. There are other uses that would be allowed in the CG. I just simply listed a few. Borup: The applicant or representative like to come forward. Bowcutt: Becky-Bowcutt, -Briggs-Engineering, 1800 W. Overland in Boise. i am representing the applicant in this matter. The property is owned by Overland, LLC. As Brad indicated sometime, I think it was late last year, we came through and asked for a re -designation of this property and then the adjoining property owned by G.L. Voigt Development fo-change the land use from or the designation from single family residential �o mixed planned use development. That application was granted. We've been working with the city over the past probably 10 months for extension of public services to this area, from the north side of Interstate 84. The sewer was located up in Wells Circle, which is within the interior of that Subdivision you see, -right above where it says 1-84. We worked with the city to extend the sewer to the south side of the Interstate to Overland and in conjunction, the water line was extended westward on Overland and taken north at the same time through the same bore to the north side of Overland—north sidee-ofthe interstate for St. Luke's+iospital. That is creating a loop of the city wader system to increase the fire flow capacity that was necessary for the phase 3 of the St.' Luke's Hospital. That part of the infra structure has been installed. It was just completed here a few weeks ago, so now we submitted our applications and we are before you on this corner parcel. Originally we asked for a CG designation. The reason being after pre applications meetings with the staff. They said yeah, that is probably the best zone because it is predominantly CG north of us. As you can see all that orange area. When we received comments from the staff stating that CN was probably more appropriate because it does have some limitations on some more intensive uses. We discussed it and we concur with the staff. We believe that the neighborhood commercial would be acceptable because that is the intent of this application for development of this corner parcel is to provide neighborhood commercial uses that would service this area. It was not intended to be like highway commercial like you would find say on Fairview. Some of the uses that we have discussed would be such things as dry cleaners, video stores, maybe a deli, possibly a convenience store. Maybe in the future a grocery store, if there is enough homes in that area. We question Rv: city or Meridian; Memo U Becky Bowcutt 2088886854; May -15-00 4:53PM; Page 2/2 MAY 15 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE Front: Brad Hawkins -Clark CC: Shari Stiles, Will Berg, Bruce Freckleton Gate: 05/15/00 Re: Fire Department Approval of Gates in Resolution Business Park (File No. PP -00-06) Becky, As you know, on 519100 the P8Z Commission recommended approval to City Council of the Resolution Business Park applications. All six applications are scheduled for hearing at the June 6, 2000 Council meeting. One of the pending items that the Commission included in their motion was to install an "operable gate" in the new road between Site A and B with the cooperation of the Fire Department in order to prevent students crossing over to Locust Grove. The size, exact placement, and type of Construction all need to be finalized. Please work with Kenny Bowers, Fire Chief, on this and obtain written approval from Kenny Prior to the meeting. Also, prior to the June 6"' meeting, please submit a revised copy of the plat showing the new vehicular cross access between Site A and B, the preferred emergency access point (three options were discussed by P8Z), and other revisions as required in the Staff report. If possible, it would also be helpful to have details from ACHD on what warrants would be required in order to justify the new Locust/Ovedand signal. Thanks, Brad • Page 1 MAY 15 '00 16.52 2088886854 PAGE.02 � CGv MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING:%d' / APPLICANT: 6, L = l� 0 �� AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: fR REQUEST: /) Ir- /-v &/7 AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY:. CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA STREET NAME COMMITTE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: Q �� /4�. //q Ams t oo COMMENTS Meridian Planning and Zor``g Commission Special Meeting March 22, 2000 Page 3 the fact that we think it is longer term as far as development of this corner parcel. We really believe that that overpass at Locust Grove would most likely have to go in before you start getting enough volume to get tenants interested for commercial uses on this corner parcel. We are looking long term and what we tried to do was come in and put these two parcels together and come up with a planned unit development. Trying to give the commission and council an idea of what can be done with these parcels and how they can inter relate and serve this area. Do you have any questions? Borup: Thank you. We would like to open this up for any public testimony. Again, keep in mind the testimony we are taking at this time is on the annexation and zoning of this parcel on the corner. The staff recommendation was to zone it Commercial Neighborhood and the applicant said they concur with that zoning designation. So if we have anyone you are welcome to come forward at this time. Seeing none—what we are doing right now this is just on the zoning of this parcel. We will be getting to the other ones on the office buildings, the skating rink, the apartment buildings—those are all covered. There is an agenda on the back that lists the different hearings that will be discussed. We are handling these one at a time so that we can keep the comments pertinent to the area where that is the application. The comments that we had from the staff and from the applicant was essentially requesting annexation and zoning of that shaded area. Nothing else at this time. We still have a plat they need to file and a conditional use permit—and then any buildings going in would some of the uses would need to be under a conditional use permit so when they have a specific use for that building, they'd come back before the commission with another public hearing for those uses, because there is a lot uses on the neighborhood commercial that require another public hearing if those type—there would be some permitted uses but other uses require a conditional use. At this point we are not going to be going anymore detail other than the land itself. The question was, what does RT to CG. RT is rural transition. It is the county designation. This property is still in the county. CG is general commercial. We would probably not be zoning it general commercial. Staff has recommended neighborhood commercial and the applicant has concurred with that, which is a lower zoning (inaudible) zoning, less extensive uses. It wouldn't have the heavy uses allowed in the neighborhood commercial. That's a liability company. That's the owner of the property. Barbeiro: If you would like I have a copy of the zoning ordinances here. If you'd like to come up here I will loan you this while you're here. Borup: Are we okay to answer questions if 1 repeat them or do we need to get them up here. You can come up, but the question was so we can get it on the record, does the zoning allow gas stations and the answer is no. Is that correct Brad. Hawkins Clark: I would just reiterate that we have requested as staff that any future use in that (inaudible) will require conditional use permit. Even though it's normal, so everyone within 300 feet of that property boundaries that cross hashed piece would receive notification by mail. Regardless of if it's permitted in the CN. Meridian Planning and Zc–",g Commission Special Meeting March 22, 2000 Page 4 Borup: Did that clarify that. There won't be anything happening without come back for another public testimony pubic hearing. Any building or any use. Just state your name and address and then ask the question. Demayo: My name is Michael Demayo. I live at 1986 E. Easy Jet Street, Los Alamitos Subdivision. I am not sure of the procedures. Is this the time that we would discuss what kind of improvements to the street and infra structure. Borup: That would be coming up. Thank you. Anyone else. Shipley: I am John Shipley. I live at 2770 S. Locust Grove, right where they are putting in the bridge. I would like to ask the Commissioner's what does the law say about traffic and how much traffic can be on a road before you even discuss anymore develops. Borup: Our attorney may want to answer that but I am not aware of any law that discusses that at all. Swartley: Mr. Chairman, no I am not either and those are issues that would be addressed at ACHD not at this commission. Shipley: I just wanted to verify that the other night I went over to Wal-Mart at 4 o'clock and it took me 2-1/2 hours to get home. Any dumb plumber knows that you can't stick 4 lanes of traffic into a 2 lane pipe. Thank you. Borup: Anyone else. Commissioner's. Did the applicant have any final comment. Bartell: Marian Bartell. I live at 2534 S. Velvet Falls. My great concern is that Overland Road is over capacity now and my feeling is I've got the complete plat from Briggs Engineering of everything that is going in proposed and we have talked to Ada County Highway District. They don't plan to widen Overland 5 years. They plan to put the overpass in first and then it may be 5 years the soonest on Locust Grove if may be up to 20 years and I am just speaking in general of all it going in. Everything north of Overland, which we have no objections to, that's good usable commercial property. South of Overland, your dumping so much traffic, as he said, into a tiny space. My opinion is it is highly reckless endangerment of lives and that there is no other way to put it. You can not put that many cars into that area on a road all ready over crowded. It won't work. Five years the soonest before it is going to be developed. Thank you. Borup: I agree that's a problem. ACHD has stated many times that it's got to happen the other way. They don't build the roads without the cars. They build the roads for the cars and—we're going to need to keep this a little more orderly. We've been listening to ACHD reports the last 5 years and we know what they say. They have told us that repeated times. I might mention right now as we do not have the ACHD report on this project, that is something that this commission has always required before we finalize anything. We are not sure of the status of that report and where as far as a time frame. Meridian Planning and Z(----ig March 22, 2000 Page 5 Did you have something new? Commission Special Meeting Bartell: Yes. In the mornings and in the evenings Overland— Borup: Something pertaining to the annexation. This annexation has no buildings no roads. It is not going to effect traffic. Norton: I move that we close the public hearing. Barbeiro: I will second the motion. Borup: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: In light of that fact maybe we might want to discuss a little bit where we might want to head. We do not have the ACHD report. It would be my anticipation that we will probably be continuing the other hearings without the ACHD report. That has been our practice in the past. Do the Commissioner's confer. Okay. Then, also keeping consistent with our preference to submit all applications to City Council together. The best option here is to table Item number 1. The attorney feels that the discussion should take place right prior to the vote. If we vote on it tonight, within 45 days it needs to get to City Council. That time frame may work out or we may have a situation where it go to City Council prior to us acting on the balance of the items. I was saying we had a couple of options but probably tabling it is the most viable, if the other Commissioner's agree. Barbeiro: Would that be necessary we go through a motion to table this. I wish to motion that we table Item number 1 request for annexation and zoning of 16.119 acres from RT to CN for proposed Resolution Business Park to our next regularly scheduled meeting of April 11tH Norton: I second. Borup: Motion and second, any discussion. All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: Thank you. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR REZONE OF 37.64 ACRES FROM R-4 TO LO FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC—OVERLAND AND LOCUST GROVE ROADS: Borup: Mr. Hawkins Clark, do you have a report for us. MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING — APRIL 11 2000 The regular scheduled meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Keith Borup. MEMBERS PRESENT: Keith Borup, Sally Norton, Kent Brown, Tom Barbeiro, Richard Hatcher. OTHERS PRESENT: David Swartley, Bruce Freckleton, Brad Hawkins Clark, Christie Richardson, Ray Voss, Will Berg. Borup: Good evening ladies and gentlemen. We'd like to begin the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting regular scheduled meeting for Tuesday April 11th. First item is minutes from the March 14th meeting. Any comments, questions, additions on the minutes. Does that mean no. Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman I wish to make a motion that we approve the minutes from the March 14th meeting as submitted. Norton: I second. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: 3 AYES, 1 ABSTAIN Borup: Item number 1 and 2 is tabled from the previous meeting. Items 3,4,5,6 are continued public hearings all on the same project. I'd like to hear a staff report first on the status. We continued awaiting the ACHD report, which we have not received. Brad have you got some update on that. Hawkins Clark: Yes Commission Borup and Commissioner's, the first two items as you know, you closed the public hearings. The others, particularly the plat, was continued for the purpose of receiving the Ada County Highway District report. Our department spoke with Ada County Highway District this afternoon and they have requested that, number one, the packet that you received that had the draft ACHD staff report be omitted and not entered into the record. There was some mistakes and confusion on that. Number two, the date for the resolution ACHD commission meeting was set for tomorrow night. That has been moved off of tomorrow nights agenda. There has not been a new date set. They are in the process, I understand, of working with the developer on several major issues related to the road widening and other issues of dedication and such. Those discussions are happening with ACHD staff and the developer and a revised report has not been submitted for your consideration. Borup: Thank you. Any questions from the Commissioner's. Brad, do you know whether the developers representative is here tonight. Meridian Planning and Zu,ing Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 Page 2 Hawkins Clark: I believe Becky Bowcutt from Briggs Engineering did call. I did not speak with her but she did call and state she was not coming. There may be someone else present. I don't know. Borup: Before we open the hearing, is there any one here representing the application? Thank you. Commissioner's in light of the fact that these were continued for a specific purpose, receiving the ACHD report, is there any motion you'd like to make. I think we could deal with all six items probably in one motion. Norton: Mr. Commissioner. Does staff know when we'd get a ACHD report. Hawkins Clark: We do not. Norton: Mr. Chairman, can we state a meeting date which we could continue this. Borup: If we continue, it would need to be to a date certain. Hatcher: Are there standard scheduled meetings now. Borup: Not yet. I don't think—we won't have anything from ACHD in 2 weeks any way. Hatcher: I make a motion then that we take the first six items on our agenda and continue them until our regularly scheduled meeting which would be May 9th. Barbeiro: I'll second the motion. Borup: Motion and second to continue items 1 through 6 for May 9th meeting. Any discussion. All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: 3 AYES, 1 ABSTAIN Borup: All right, nine minutes after and we've gone through 6 items. Norton: Would it be possible to move number 15 up next as the applicant had submitted a letter. Borup: I think the applicants letter was submitted concerned that it might be bumped from the agenda, was my understanding. I think out of fairness to the other applicants maybe lets at least take the next two and then and then discuss that. That sound all right. Meridian Planning and Zo...,ig Commission Meeting April 11, 2000 Page 3 Berg: Mr. Chairman and members of the Commission, the concern about moving items different from what the agenda, we as an agency we publish our agenda and people get in their heads trying to figure out a time they need to be there, so we just got to be a little bit of leery of moving them too far without the public trying to out guess the time frame. I try to discourage to out guess what the decisions of the commission might be but they still try to do that. I think it is a good idea to maybe to try to not push some things real early if they are late on the agenda unless we can get that notice out a little bit earlier to the public. Borup: I think we make sure the items heard tonight one way or the other without going all night. Brown: Just for the audience to understand, I'd like to make a statement about what our purpose is here. We are a voluntary body. We are not elected. We are just citizens like yourselves. Hopefully that will bring a few more smiles then what I see out there tonight. We are just residents of the City of Meridian and the area of impact, just like you are. We volunteer our time to come down here and make recommendations to the City Council. Our decisions are only recommendations to the Council. They are the decision making body. We spend time reading the reports and weighing the information and hopefully that will make us a little more happy in this meeting. I understand that everybody has their own kingdoms in which they live and hopefully we can do the best for the City of Meridian. Thank you. 7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RV SALES, RV RETAIL AND REPAIR ZONED I -L BY MAPLE GROVE R.V.-2490 W. FRANKLIN ROAD: Borup: Brad, have you got anything additional. I think we received a revised plat which is what we requested from last time. Hawkins Clark: Yes Commissioner. Not a plat but a site plan should have been received right. This was continued from the April 3rd meeting. It is my understanding for two reasons. One was to obtain a revised plan per the staff recommendations and then the second was for the variance application regarding the paving. There was—you should have in your packets a March 27 letter from our fire Marshall and Chief, Skip Voss and Kenny Bowers dated March 27 regarding this project as well as an April 6th letter from Matthew Dugan. Just for the benefit of the audience the cross hatched on the screen is the property subject property. The revised plan dated April 6th which you should have, does address most of the staff comments that we had. They are providing a 30 foot landscape setback instead of the 35, but giving the situation of the building on Franklin and here is the—actually we do not have the revised site plan available for you on the slide. It was not provided in 8-1/2 by 11 so apologies for that. The fencing, they are providing solid wood only in the rear storage area. Staffs initial aim on that was to see fencing on the site, but that would be a commission decision as to whether or not co r T o a w CT1 WO N O 00 Q \\ cn �a ID a A le� "IZ!3 s Cly' �ir��' Ca N 1 r -* D nZ m i CL (D y Q JJCD 3 a a � Z a a a � N ❑OOOS) y Jv p c coo ID � N a m ti r� Q o CD 3 CD O❑OO w. - � m � C, m C, o m= z. 0- a R 0 � (ni G c CD (D a c m CD m a 0 OO -0 CD Om 0 Z x �o C c � �.. m c aID 0 m n m Q (CD a w m0 \ m och o � Q 0 X (D C, N ti (D n Q a �) a0-3 CD 2 �O 7 !I7 O (D CD p = O m CD 3 CD o cp Q N G � t "I'o _ <Z CL 3 cr 00 0— 93 ECD c N CD _ 0 y 3 C i 0 (b m 5 0 CD d p =ID mmmm'm� D .7 w O n (D C N _ Q Q CD aN Ln W m� �oo�d Al o (Dy 3.� (r°�3 g o o �3E»� m ID N °i) C (f (c 300 0O Z o nool m oQ(D 3 n 3 a D n ID 0— 0 '3 y0 n C d �D 03' m°pa'$IDOCL 3 D j ' (3 3 -' n' OD j ND m m yi n n' N�(D 'O y O (D k Q n °03��' =CD �3 m S 0 0 CD0 nID c(o mR3�3v' c m� b m (D N C CL n o O��c'� Oo D UJ N y x' a�aN�� O. (D .0 N j 3 a i 0 d� Da w N N I N d ID N y (=i s o� Z cl �cna0n� a A le� "IZ!3 s Cly' �ir��' Ca N 1 r -* D nZ m i CL (D y Q JJCD 3 a a � Z a a a � N ❑OOOS) y Jv p c coo ID � N a m ti r� Q o CD 3 CD O❑OO w. - � m � C, m C, o m= z. 0- a R 0 � (ni G c CD (D a c m CD m a 0 OO -0 CD Om 0 Z x �o C c � �.. m c aID 0 m n m Q (CD a w m0 \ m och o � Q 0 X (D C, N ti (D n Q a �) a0-3 CD 2 �O 7 !I7 O (D CD p = O m CD 3 CD o cp Q N G � t r CD Ca CD l CD C �t CODS o CD m CD Z CL = m Q o N Oa oCD 5.0 CDCD 0 y w 'v N CD v 2 3 CD a D m crlbD 0 f m x O OD d 'o 0. an d m: m 4 M c m c N m ID v, °703 �0< O o X OT O N ID m= oo O0 N' w p O � O 0 O .a n O w C n3�°n 3 m o w 1 c w m ° -3 — d3.` 3 m m w m � . Fn n a -Ib Ma. x p ° 0 3 3' aL° �'-w`y 3 �m 3 m w m c a� 3 .=o. S OFS.nw 'a0 n O n 3 c°'Q m y 3 3 v+' L dL ' m (D (D m w>?��3 -0 CL o.zw .<nF.� °O� c's �vo��3m o d o'm� w co w ID c 3. w m _;m c n(D y N j 3 (CDL E2(3D N 7 zm n IL CL .CD mm i �n I(,I_r% I W ❑❑ ❑ CD I� ClN0a Cl N 0 N a o C 0ElO❑ r ❑❑ ❑ CD ClN0a Cl N 0 N a o C 0ElO❑ CD �N (ice �_ °� z� a �a _ Z3 m Q 3cD o CD 0 w ° a G P � w � `c m CD ID C j n w 0 N S�(D (D a O _ c 0E] _ - 0� (D Al p a o c �. c a p -n CD _n \ ID ti �Cl) O n x. CD CD F=ti CD CL W a0•3 CDco0a j (D S CD 2 � w 0 _n p n Q)O-.. (D CD to Q 0 9ID mO� CL CD w N ti i a d A W N1A 01 CO 0 V (Y) W N 1 CD p Z i Cl) :3m yam a (D O(Dd ^� 9 ° CD CD � 0 a or m m`, Q C w Q con V,—) ��t- OCD o CD m (�} w 1 N N � 3 1 LB o m (� 3 ° ,J N r �' h i lb m x 0 m ai cm 2. WCL m y (.-D m c ,�.. m50- d_ v m 0 CD w o. m s 1 o O O (81X c 0 O ] N N C 69 01 110Dai.o �. 01 tO o (J= C w 8O Q N m N CD m�37 3.-5w ocd_ coo D o v CD o w w D a o u D X G CD ° o 3 o o k m m O y W p 3 m �o DQo- 0 a3 cam. F3.3 3 J N N Q (D t1 >?W.° w 1 n F � c � c O o c m 3 Er R ow,x CL, a w m D N j N lD w w c z �0�oa D v m w o w NtD y a 2:aitmm�m n m # m z SD rQ b Ni� J 1 DDD D 0 m m x 0 c n x0 Z `l co m Q 3 CD w ❑DDD Cl. n � n m m o m _ waw n� CD :D co a m w - `D a o -. c m CD D C (D D Q. MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING: May 9 2000 APPLICANT: G.L. VOIGT ITEM NUMBER: 1-6 REQUEST: RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK -ALL SIX PROJECTS AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING & ZONING DEPT. CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WASTEWATER DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: SANITARY SERVICE: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. r ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT Planning and Development Division Development Application Report Preliminary Plat — Resolution Business Park / Locust Grove Rd/Overland Road MAZ00-004/MCUP00-015/MCUP00-016/ MCUP00-017 An application for a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City of Meridian for a 17 -lot residential and commercial subdivision on 107.06 -acres. The applicant is also requesting conditional use and rezone approval. The City has forwarded the application to ACHD for review and comment. The site is located at the southeast corner of Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. This development is estimated to generate 9,430 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic study. Roads impacted by this development: Locust Grove Road Overland Road ACHD Commission Date — May 3, 2000 - 12:00 p.m. Resolution Subdivision Page 1 R1 i INTERSTATE 84 I -L MERIDIAN CITY IMITS BOUNDARY C -G R1 01 "0111,14, ON 1 i N � 500 1 I -L I C -G RT 0 500 1000 Feet BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. PROPOSED REZONE REVISION BRIGGS RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20, T.3N., RAE., B.M., (208) 3444-9700 MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO SHEET 1 OF 1 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD DESIGN DRAFT SCALE DATE 00' DWG. NO. \0101.APR BOISE, IDAHO 83705 BKB 1"=5 02/01/70 0101 LOCUST GROVE ROAD ----�- LIML I i f 6000 -No. B TAIL 1 � 0o o p Q Q p �--� o � c FIGURE 3 RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC YR. 2005 f ADT -0- AVERAGE AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC TraM Study Prepared By: DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. m H—&.W— o.. 5+a 0 OM 30-X= e"1 Facts and Findings: A. General Information Owner — G.I. Voigt Applicant - Same R-4, RT - Existing zoning L -O, C -G - Requested zoning 107.06 - Acres West Ada - Impact Fee Service Area Meridian - Impact Fee Assessment District Locust Grove Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count 3,552 on 7-16-99 A -Existing Level of Service C -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 950 -feet of frontage 50 to 70 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Locust Grove Road is improved with two lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. The segment of Locust Grove Road abutting the site is not listed in the current Five Year Work Program for reconstruction. Overland Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count 11,422 on 11-30-99 (west of Eagle Road) Traffic count 9,916 on 11-23-99 (west of Locust Grove Road) D -Existing Level of Service E -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 2,640 -feet of frontage 50 to 70 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Resolution Subdivision Page 2 17 - Proposed lots r> 200 - Proposed multi -family dwelling units 346,000 - Square feet of proposed building 125,000 -square feet of Office building 145,000 -square feet of Retail building 57,000 -square feet of an Ice Rink : 19,000 -square feet of Day Care Center Meridian High School 2,300 - Total lineal feet of proposed public streets 286 - Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) West Ada - Impact Fee Service Area Meridian - Impact Fee Assessment District Locust Grove Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count 3,552 on 7-16-99 A -Existing Level of Service C -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 950 -feet of frontage 50 to 70 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Locust Grove Road is improved with two lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. The segment of Locust Grove Road abutting the site is not listed in the current Five Year Work Program for reconstruction. Overland Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count 11,422 on 11-30-99 (west of Eagle Road) Traffic count 9,916 on 11-23-99 (west of Locust Grove Road) D -Existing Level of Service E -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 2,640 -feet of frontage 50 to 70 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Resolution Subdivision Page 2 r Overland Rod is improved with two lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. The segment of Overland Road abutting the site is listed in the current Five -Year Work Program for t: reconstruction to 5 -lane in FY (2004). Blue Tick Street/Brandys Jewel Street Local streets with no bike lane designation No traffic count available 50 -feet of frontage 50 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 50 -feet required right-of-way for their extensions Blue Tick Street and Brandys Jewel Street are improved as 37 -foot street section with curb, gutter and sidewalk. B. On March 27, 2000, the District Planning and Development staff inspected this site and evaluated the transportation system in the vicinity. On March 31, 2000, the staff met as the District's Technical Review Committee and reviewed the impacts of this proposed development on the District's transportation system. The results of that analysis constitute the following Facts and Findings and recommended Site Specific Requirements. C. Locust Grove Road has 3,522 existing vehicle trips per day, which is a Level of Service A (LOS A). An acceptable Level of Service for this segment of roadway is D (LOS D) or 14,000 vehicle trips per day. The proposed application will add approximately 3,000 vehicle trips per day on Locust Grove Road. D. Current traffic counts indicate that Overland Road carries 11,422 vehicle trips per day (VTD). The planning threshold for Overland Road is 14, 000 VDT with its current configuration. When Overland Road is rebuilt to five lanes, the planning threshold for Overland Road will be 33,000 VTD. The proposed application will add approximately 6,000 vehicle trips per day on Overland Road, therefore the existing, phis project traffic exceeds the planning threshold of Overland Road with its current configuration. When Overland Road is rebuilt to five -lanes, the roadway will be adequate to accommodate the traffic generated from this site. E. The Eagle Road/Overland Road intersection operates at a Level of Service E/F threshold, and is listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The subject site's additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. The District has already initiated a project (to be started within the next few months) to provide additional turn lanes and make other capacity enhancements to improve the intersections' operating characteristics. The improvement plans have not been finalized but the anticipation is for a substantial increase in capacity. F. The Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection operates at a Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The subject site's additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. G. A traffic study was submitted for the Resolution Subdivision site development plan. The key findings of the traffic study include the following: Resolution Subdivision Page 3 r • The proposed development is expected to generate 12,495 total daily vehicle trips. An 1-11 0ii estimated 3,045 trips are pass-by trips, leaving 9,430 new daily vehicle trips added to the adjacent roadway system. • The Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection currently operates at Level of Service (LOS) F. Because Meridian Road is a principal arterial, LOS E is acceptable under -. current District policy. The intersection exceeds the allowable Level of Service. • Under "existing plus project" traffic volumes (Year 2005), the Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection is expected to operate at Level of Service (LOS) F. The District has currently programmed a project to upgrade Overland Road to create additional capacity. C.- The design and magnitude of the improvements have not yet been determined. Because Meridian Road is a principal arterial, LOS E is acceptable under current District policy. • The Locust Grove Road/Overland Road intersection currently operates at an overall Level of Service (LOS) A. The intersection is STOP controlled only on the two Locust Grove Road approaches. Left turns from northbound Locust Grove on to westbound Overland Road 4 operate at an LOS F condition. If a traffic signal were constructed with the existing traffic volumes and roadway geometry, the intersection would operate at an n, overall LOS B. • Under the existing traffic volumes, both Overland Road and Locust Grove Road operate at an arterial LOS of A with volume -to -capacity ratios of less than 0.35 during peak hour conditions. • The Year 2020 traffic forecast of 18,000 vehicles per day for Overland Road indicates the need to widen the roadway from two to five lanes. The widening is desirable from -. an operational and safety standpoint and is required within 500 feet of the Eagle Road intersection. • The Year 2020 traffic forecast of 8,700 vehicles per day for Locust Grove Road does not indicate the need to add capacity. • The forecast traffic volumes at the Locust Grove Road intersection with Overland Road justify a traffic signal under existing plus project traffic volumes. The applicant should be required to provide 25 -percent of the cost for the traffic signal, which is $37,500.00. The District will construct the traffic signal when it is warranted. • The site driveways on Overland Road are expected to have traffic volumes low enough 4 that traffic signals are not needed. • The new public street intersection on Overland Road is expected to have traffic volumes n, that warrant a traffic signal. The applicant should be required to provide 75 -percent of the cost to construct the traffic signal, which is $112,500.00 (total cost is $150,000). The District will construct the traffic signal when it is warranted. • The site driveway intersections on Locust Grove Road are expected to have traffic volumes low enough that traffic signals are not needed, however, all the intersections on Locust Grove Road will require the construction of a center turn lane. • All the intersections on Overland Road will require the construction of a center turn lane. Due to the locations of the intersections and the taper lengths required for the turn lanes, the applicant would be required to add another traffic lane on Overland Road .. abutting the entire site. • The consultant was not aware of ACHD's project to widen the Overland Road/Eagle Road intersection when the TIS was performed. The Eagle Road/Overland Road intersection was identified to operate at Level of Service (LOS) F under existing and build out conditions. The District is adding turn -lanes at the intersection this fiscal year, Resolution Subdivision Page 4 r' which will improve the operations of the intersection to an adequate Level of Service D (LOS D). Overland Road is scheduled for reconstruction from two to five lanes in FY ., 2004. When the roadway is reconstructed to five lanes, the intersection will operate at an adequate Level of Service C (LOS Q. H. The applicant is proposing a stub street to the south property line located 1,000 -feet west of the east property line. District Staff supports the location of the stub street. The applicant should provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub street with a temporary easement provided to the District. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that; "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. �r 1. The applicant is proposing a stub street to the east property line located 400 -feet south of Overland Road. District Staff supports the location of the stub street. The applicant should provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub street with a temporary easement provided to the District. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that; "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. J. The improvement of Overland Road abutting this development is included in the District's current Five Year Work Program. District policy requires the applicant to provide a $52,800.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the parcel (approximately 2,640 -feet) prior to District approval of a final plat, whichever occurs first. K. The improvement of Locust Grove Road abutting this development is not included in the District's current Five Year Work Program. District policy requires the applicant to constrict a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel prior to District approval of a final plat. The sidewalk should be located two feet within the new right-of-way of Locust Grove Road. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. L. The applicant is proposing two driveways on Locust Grove Road. The driveways are located as r follows: ♦ The northern driveway is proposed to be located 440 -feet south of Overland xa-0 Road. ♦ The southern driveway is proposed to be located 690 -feet south of Overland Road. Peacock Street intersects Locust Grove Road from the west approximately 550 -feet south of Overland Road and Labrador Street approximately 1,100 -feet south of Overland Road. District q. policy requires the applicant to locate driveways on Locust Grove Road a minimum of 440 -feet south of Overland Road and 220 -feet from the streets on the west side of Locust Grove Road. The applicant's proposed driveways do not meet the required offset from Peacock Street on the west side of Locust Grove Road. The applicant should be required to locate the northern driveway to align with Peacock Street to west, and the southern driveway should be located 75 - feet north of the south property line. The driveways should be constructed 30 to 35 -foot wide Resolution Subdivision Page 5 AW vn"with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the roadway. The applicant should be required to provide 100 -feet of stacking for both the inbound and out -bound travel lanes for the driveway Coordinate the design of the driveways with District staff. Mo M. The applicant is proposing three driveways on Overland Road. The driveways are located as follows: All the driveways align with existing driveways on the north side of the road, which meets District policy. The driveways should be constructed 30 to 35 -feet wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the existing roadway edge. N. The applicant is proposing to construct two public roads off Overland Road. The roads are proposed to be located: ♦ 320 -feet west of the east property line: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to locate driveways off this public street a minimum of 100 -feet south of Overland Road. The roadway should be constructed as a 40 -foot street section with curbs gutters and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58 -feet of right-of-way. ♦ 850 -feet west of the east property line: based on the submitted traffic study this roadway should be signalized and driveways on this roadway should be located a minimum of 175 -feet south of Overland Road and consecutive driveways should be required to align or offset a minimum of 150 -feet. The roadway should be constructed as a 46 -foot street section with curbs, gutters, and a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 64 -feet of right-of-way. This road should be signalized. The applicant should be required to construct a signal for the new intersection. Coordinate the design of the signalized intersection with District staff. The District should provide 25 -percent of the cost of the signal. ♦ The applicant is proposing an east/west road located 400 -feet south of Overland Road: the applicant should be required to locate driveways on the new roadway a minimum of 50 -feet from a public street intersection. The applicant is proposing a traffic circles within the roadway. The street section around the traffic circle should be constructed 29 -feet wide. A YIELD sign should be installed at all approaches into the islands and directional islands should be constructed in the street approaches to the traffic circles to guide motorists in the proper direction. The pedestrian crossings shall be located at the intersection to Resolution Subdivision Page 6 ♦ 480 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 930 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 1,280 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of stacking for this driveway. All the driveways align with existing driveways on the north side of the road, which meets District policy. The driveways should be constructed 30 to 35 -feet wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the existing roadway edge. N. The applicant is proposing to construct two public roads off Overland Road. The roads are proposed to be located: ♦ 320 -feet west of the east property line: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to locate driveways off this public street a minimum of 100 -feet south of Overland Road. The roadway should be constructed as a 40 -foot street section with curbs gutters and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58 -feet of right-of-way. ♦ 850 -feet west of the east property line: based on the submitted traffic study this roadway should be signalized and driveways on this roadway should be located a minimum of 175 -feet south of Overland Road and consecutive driveways should be required to align or offset a minimum of 150 -feet. The roadway should be constructed as a 46 -foot street section with curbs, gutters, and a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 64 -feet of right-of-way. This road should be signalized. The applicant should be required to construct a signal for the new intersection. Coordinate the design of the signalized intersection with District staff. The District should provide 25 -percent of the cost of the signal. ♦ The applicant is proposing an east/west road located 400 -feet south of Overland Road: the applicant should be required to locate driveways on the new roadway a minimum of 50 -feet from a public street intersection. The applicant is proposing a traffic circles within the roadway. The street section around the traffic circle should be constructed 29 -feet wide. A YIELD sign should be installed at all approaches into the islands and directional islands should be constructed in the street approaches to the traffic circles to guide motorists in the proper direction. The pedestrian crossings shall be located at the intersection to Resolution Subdivision Page 6 r"R1 e00%, r improve pedestrian/vehicular recognition and safety. Coordinate the traffic control plan and location of the pedestrian crossings with District staff. In order to provide safe turning movements into the driveways and streets on Overland Road and avoid a continuous meandering travel path a continuous turning lane is required from Locust Grove Road to the east property line. The design will provide turning movement at all driveways and streets through and including Locust Grove and new east -west street. O. ACHD's Park & Ride Division Staff have indicated the need for a park and ride location at the applicant's site. The District requests that applicant grant the District an easement for a 10 to 12 - space Park & Ride area at this site. Commuteride staff will contact the applicant to coordinate the location of the Park & Ride area. ' P. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that Tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Pat Nelson at 387-6160. Q. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, it is recommended that the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. R. A Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) is formed with a coordinator that works as a liaison between businesses and private and public transportation providers to increase the use of alternative transportation and other trip reduction measures (shuttle buses, bus pass programs, vanpools, carpools, bicycle and walking enhancements). An annual survey will be required of the TMA/TMO to monitor participation in alternative transportation programs and forwarded to the ACRD Commuteride Office. S. District policy states that direct access to arterials and collectors is normally restricted and that the developer shall try to use combined access points. In accordance with District policy the applicant should be required to provide a recorded cross access easement among the lots within the proposed subdivision for use to access the public streets prior to issuance of a building permit ° (or other required permits). T. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Locust Grove Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. U. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Overland Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. V. Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with past action by the District the applicant should be required to pave all driveways their frill width and at least 30 -feet into the site beyond the edge of Resolution Subdivision Page 7 h� pavement of Overland Road and Locust Grove Road and install pavement tapers with 15 -foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. w W. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the undeveloped parcels abutting this site may be required upon review of a future application for this site. X. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, may be placed on future development of this parcel. Y. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the school parcel abutting this site should be extended upon review of a future application for this site. Z. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will require improvement in order to accommodate the additional traffic generated by this proposed development. The Overland Road/Meridian Road intersection currently operates at deficient Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of the 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The reconstruction of the intersection by the District is not listed in ACHD's Five year Work Program. The following Site Specific Requirements and Standard Requirements must be met or provided for prior to ACHD approval of the final plat: Special Recommendation to City of Meridian: In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Ms Pat Nelson at 387-6160. 2. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) should be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. ACHD's Park & Ride Division Staff have indicated the need for a park and ride location at the applicant's site. The District requests that applicant grant the District an easement fora 10 to 12 -space Park & Ride area at this site. Commuteride staff will contact the applicant to coordinate the location of the Park & Ride area. 4. The transportation system will require improvement in order to accommodate the additional traffic generated by additional development. The Overland Road/Meridian Road intersection currently operates at a deficient Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. Additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. The reconstruction of the Overland Road/Meridian Road Street intersection is not listed in ACHD's Five year Work Program. Resolution Subdivision Pave 8 Site Specific Requirements: 1. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Overland Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right- of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #193. 2. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right- of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #193. 3. Provide a stub street to the south property line located 1,000 -feet west of the east property line. Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. 4. Provide a stub street to the east property line located 400 -feet south of Overland Road. Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. 5. Provide a $112,500.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for 75 -percent of the cost to constrict a traffic signal on Overland Road for the new collector roadway. The District will constrict the signal when it is warranted. 6. Provide a $37,500.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for 25 -percent of the cost of constructing a traffic signal at the Overland Road/Locust Grove Road intersection. The District will construct the signal when it is warranted. 7. Provide a $52,800.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the parcel (approximately 2,640 -feet) prior to District approval of a final plat, whichever occurs first. 8. Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel prior to District approval of a final plat. Locate the sidewalk two feet within the new right-of-way of Locust Grove Road. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. Resolution Subdivision Page 9 10 11. tolos e^� Locate two driveways on Locust Grove Road as follows: ♦ The northern driveway shall be located 550 -feet south of Overland Road to align with Peacock Street to the west. ♦ The southern driveway shall be located 75 -feet north of the south property line. The driveways shall be constructed 30 to 35 -foot wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the roadway. Provide 100 -feet of stacking for both the inbound and out -bound travel lanes for the driveways. Coordinate the design of the driveways with District staff. Locate three driveways on Overland Road as follows: ♦ 480 -feet east of Locust Grove Road for this driveway. ♦ 930 -feet east of Locust Grove Road for this driveway. provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking ♦ 1,280 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 100 -feet of stacking for this driveway. The driveways shall be constructed 30 to 35 -feet wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the existing roadway edge. Locate two public roads as follows: ♦ off Overland Road 320 -feet west of the east property line: locate driveways off this public street a minimum of 100 -feet south of Overland Road. The roadway shall be constructed as a 40 -foot street section with curbs gutters and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58 -feet of right-of-way. ♦ off Overland Road 850 -feet west of the east property line: driveways off this roadway shall be located a minimum of 175 -feet south of Overland Road and consecutive driveways are required to align or offset a minimum of 150 -feet. The roadway shall be constricted as a 46 -foot street section with curbs, gutters, and a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 64 -feet of right-of-way. The applicant shall be required to construct a signal for the roadway/Overland Road intersection. Coordinate the design of the signalized intersection with District staff. 12. Locate an east/west road 400 -feet south of Overland Road: locate driveways on the east/west roadway a minimum of 50 -feet from a public street intersection. The traffic circle within the roadway shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 29 -feet wide street section around the traffic circle. A YIELD sign shall be installed at all approaches into the island and a directional island shall be constructed in the street approaches to the traffic circle to guide motorists in the proper direction. The pedestrian crossings shall be located at the intersection to improve pedestrian/vehicular recognition and safety. Coordinate the design of the buffer circle, the traffic control plan and location of the pedestrian crossings with District staff. Resolution Subdivision Page 10 n. eloN 13. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, shall be placed on future development of this parcel. t 14. Construct a center turn lane on Overland Road abutting the entire site. 15. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the school parcel abutting this site should be extended upon review of a future application for this site. 16. Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Overland Road and Locust Grove Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as y required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. Standard Requirements: 1. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall specifically identifyeach requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity. The written request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9.00 a m on the day scheduled for ACHD Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the i Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its orilzinal decision The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance 4193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An en1-1 gineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. Resolution Subdivision Page I 1 ?011- /lo's r r -r 6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two frill business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 8. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 9. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusion of Law: I. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development Division at 387-6170. Submitted by: Commission Action, Planniniz and Development Staff Resolution Subdivision Page 12 14:20 MAY 09, 2000 TEL N0: (208) 387-639 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT Plannin d D 1 #2605 PAGE: 2/13 MAY 2000 g an eve opment. Division Citi, of Meridian, Development Application Report C l e.rk Q nrl Preliminary Plat — Resolution Business Park / MAZ00-004/MCUP00-015/MCUP00-016/ MCUP00-017 Locust Grove Rd/Overland Road An application for a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City of Meridian for a 17 -lot residential and commercial subdivision on 107.06 -acres. The applicant is also requesting conditional use and rezone approval. The City has forwarded the application to ACHD for review and comment. The site is located at the southeast corner of Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. This development is estimated to generate 9,430 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic study. Roads impacted by this development: Locust Grove Road Overland Road ACHD Commission Date — May 3, 2000 - 12:00 p.m. Resolution Subdivision Page 1 14:21 MRY 09, 2000 TEL N0: (208) 387-6391 r. Facts and Findings: A. General Information Owner — G.I. Voigt Applicant - Same R-4, RT - Existing zoning L -O, C -G - Requested zoning 107.06 - Acres 17 - Proposed lots 200 - Proposed multi -fancily dwelling units 346,000 - Square feet of proposed building 125,000 -square feet of Office building 145,000 -square feet of Retail building 57,000 -square feet of an Ice Rink 19,000 -square feet of Day Care Center Meridian High School 2,300 - Total lineal feet of proposed public streets 286 - Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) West Ada - Impact Fee Service Area Meridian - Impact Fee Assessment District Locust Grove Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count 3,552 on 7-16-99 A -Existing Level of Service C -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 950 -feet of frontage 50 to 70 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) #2605 PRGE: 3/13 Locust Grove Road is improved with two lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. The segment of Locust Grove Road abutting the site is not listed in the current Five Year Work Program for reconstruction. Overland Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count 11,422 on 11-30-99 (west of Eagle Road) Traffic count 9,916 on 11-23-99 (west of Locust Grove Road) D -Existing Level of Service E -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 2,640 -feet of frontage 50 to 70 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline) Resolution Subdivision Page 2 MOV fa0 ) lata I n - -71-n 14:21 MAY 09, 2000 TEL N0: (208) 387-6391 #2605 PAGE: 4/13 Overland Rod is improved with two lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. The segment of Overland Road abutting the site is listed in the current Five -Year Work Program for reconstruction to 5 -lane in FY (2004). Blue Tick Street/Brandys Jewel Street Local streets with no bike lane designation No traffic count available 50 -feet of frontage 50 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 50 -feet required right-of-way for their extensions Blue Tick Street and Brandys Jewel Street are improved as 37 -foot street section with curb, gutter and sidewalk. B. On March 27, 2000, the District Planning and Development staff inspected this site and evaluated the transportation system in the vicinity. On March 31, 2000, the staff met as the District's Technical Review Committee and reviewed the impacts of this proposed development on the District's transportation system. The results of that analysis constitute the following Facts and Findings and recommended Site Specific Requirements. C. Locust Grove Road has 3,522 existing vehicle trips per day, which is a Level of Service A (LOS A). An acceptable Level of Service for this segment of roadway is D (LOS D) or 14,000 vehicle trips per day. The proposed application will add approximately 3,000 vehicle trips per day on Locust Grove Road. D. Current traffic counts indicate that Overland Road carries 11,422 vehicle trips per day (VTD). The planning threshold for Overland Road is 14, 000 VDT with its current configuration. When Overland Road is rebuilt to five lanes, the planning threshold for Overland Road will be 33,000 VTD. The proposed application will add approximately 6,000 vehicle trips per day on Overland Road, therefore the existing, plus project traffic exceeds the planning threshold of Overland Road with its current configuration. When Overland Road is rebuilt to five -lanes, the roadway will be adequate to accommodate the traffic generated from this site. E. The Eagle Road/Overland Road intersection operates at a Level of Service E/F threshold, and is listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The subject site's additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. The District has already initiated a project (to be started within the next few months) to provide additional turn lanes and make other capacity enhancements to improve the intersections' operating characteristics. The improvement plans have not been finalized but the anticipation is for a substantial increase in capacity. F. The Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection operates at a Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The subject site's additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. G. A traffic study was submitted for the Resolution Subdivision site development plan. The key findings of the traffic study include the following: Resolution Subdivision Page 3 14:22 MAY 09, 2000 r TEL N0: (208) 387-639;_-,#2685 PAGE 5/13 • The proposed development is expected to generate 12,495 total daily vehicle trips. An estimated 3,045 trips are pass -by trips, leaving 9,430 new daily vehicle trips added to the adjacent roadway system. • The Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection currently operates at Level of Service (LOS) F. Because Meridian Road is a principal arterial, LOS E is acceptable under current District policy. The intersection exceeds the allowable Level of Service. • Under "existing plus project" traffic volumes (Year 2005), the Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection is expected to operate at Level of Service (LOS) F. The District has currently programmed a project to upgrade Overland Road to create additional capacity. The design and magnitude of the improvements have not yet been determined. Because Meridian Road is a principal arterial, LOS E is acceptable under current District policy. • The Locust Grove Road/Overland Road intersection currently operates at an overall Level of Service (LOS) A. The intersection is STOP controlled only on the two Locust Grove Road approaches. Left turns from northbound Locust Grove on to westbound Overland Road operate at an LOS F condition. If a traffic signal were constructed with the existing traffic volumes and roadway geometry, the intersection would operate at an overall LOS B. • Under the existing traffic volumes, Locust Grove Road operates at an arterial LOS of A with volume -to -capacity ratios of less than 0.35 during peak hour conditions. • The Year 2020 traffic forecast of 18,000 vehicles per day for Overland Road indicates the need to widen the roadway from two to five lanes. The widening is desirable from an operational and safety standpoint and is required within 500 feet of the Eagle Road intersection. • The Year 2020 traffic forecast of 8,700 vehicles per day for Locust Grove Road does not indicate the need to add capacity. • The forecast traffic volumes at the Locust Grove Road intersection with Overland Road justify a traffic signal under existing plus project traffic volumes. The applicant should be required to provide 25 -percent of the cost for the traffic signal, which is $37,500.00. The District will construct the traffic signal when it is warranted. • The site driveways on Overland Road are expected to have traffic volumes low enough that traffic signals are not needed. • The new public street intersection on Overland Road is expected to have traffic volumes that warrant a traffic signal. The applicant should be required to provide 75 -percent of the cost to construct the traffic signal, which is $112,500.00 (total cost is $150,000). The District will construct the traffic signal when it is warranted. • The site driveway intersections on Locust Grove Road are expected to have traffic volumes low enough that traffic signals are not needed, however, all the intersections on Locust Grove Road will require the construction of a center turn lane. • All the intersections on Overland Road will require the construction of a center turn lane. Due to the locations of the intersections and the taper lengths required for the tuns lanes, the applicant would be required to add another traffic lane on Overland Road abutting the entire site. • The consultant was not aware of ACHD's project to widen the Overland Road/Eagle Road intersection when the TIS was performed. The Eagle Road/Overland Road intersection was identified to operate at Level of Service (LOS) F under existing and build out conditions. The District is adding turn -lanes at the intersection this fiscal year, Resolution Subdivision Page 4 14:23 MAY 09, 2000 TEL N0: (208) 387-6391 #2605 PAGE: 6/13 which will improve the operations of the intersection to an adequate Level of Service D (LOS D). Overland Road is scheduled for reconstruction from two to five lanes in FY 2004. When the roadway is reconstructed to five lanes, the intersection will operate at an adequate Level of Service C (LOS C). H. The applicant is proposing a stub street to the south property line located 1,000 -feet west of the east property line. District Staff supports the location of the stub street. The applicant should provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub street with a temporary easement provided to the District. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that; "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. I. The applicant is proposing a stub street to the east property line located 400 -feet south of Overland Road. District Staff supports the location of the stub street. The applicant should provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub street with a temporary easement provided to the District. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that; "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff The improvement of Overland Road abutting this development is included in the District's current Five Year Work Program. District policy requires the applicant to provide a $52,800.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the parcel (approximately 2,640 -feet) prior to District approval of a final plat, whichever occurs first. K. The improvement of Locust Grove Road abutting this development is not included in the District's current Five Year Work Program. District policy requires the applicant to construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel prior to District approval of a final plat. The sidewalk should be located two feet within the new right-of-way of Locust Grove Road. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. L. The applicant is proposing two driveways on Locust Grove Road. The driveways are located as follows: ♦ The northern driveway is proposed to be located 440 -feet south of Overland Road. ♦ The southern driveway is proposed to be located 690 -feet south of Overland Road. Peacock Street intersects Locust Grove Road from the west approximately 550 -feet south of Overland Road and Labrador Street approximately 1,100 -feet south of Overland Road. District policy requires the applicant to locate driveways on Locust Grove Road a minimum of 440 -feet south of Overland Road and 220 -feet from the streets on the west side of Locust Grove Road. The applicant's proposed driveways do not meet the required offset from Peacock Street on the west side of Locust Grove Road. The applicant should be required to locate the northern driveway to align with Peacock Street to west, and the southern driveway should be located 75 - feet north of the south property line. The driveways should be constructed 30 to 35 -foot wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the roadway. The applicant should be required to Resolution Subdivision Page 5 14;24 NRY 09, 2000 TEL N0: (208) 387-639 #2605 PRGE: 7/13 provide 100 -feet of stacking for both the inbound and out -bound travel lanes for the driveway. Coordinate the design of the driveways with District staff. M. The applicant is proposing three driveways on Overland Road. The driveways are located as follows: ♦ 480 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 930 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 1,280 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of stacking for this driveway. All the driveways align with existing driveways on the north side of the road, which meets District policy. The driveways should be constructed 30 to 35 -feet wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the existing roadway edge. N. The applicant is proposing to construct two public roads off Overland Road. The roads are proposed to be located: ♦ 320 -feet west of the east property line: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to locate driveways off this public street a minimum of 100 -feet south of Overland Road. The roadway should be constructed as a 40 - foot street section with curbs gutters and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58 -feet of right-of-way. ♦ 850 -feet west of the east property line: based on the submitted traffic study this roadway should be signalized and driveways on this roadway should be located a minimum of 175 -feet south of Overland Road and consecutive driveways should be required to align or offset a minimum of 150 -feet. The roadway should be constructed as a 46 -foot street section with curbs, gutters, and a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 64 -feet of right-of-way. This road should be signalized. The applicant should be required to construct a signal for the new intersection. Coordinate the design of the signalized intersection with District staff. The District should provide 25 -percent of the cost of the signal. The applicant is proposing an east/west road located 400 -feet south of Overland Road: the applicant should be required to locate driveways on the new roadway a minimum of 50 -feet from a public street intersection. The applicant is proposing a traffic circles within the roadway. The street section around the traffic circle should be constructed 29 -feet wide. A YIELD sign should be installed at all approaches into the islands and directional islands should be constructed in the street approaches to the traffic circles to guide motorists in the proper direction. The pedestrian crossings shall be located at the intersection to improve pedestrian/vehicular recognition and safety. Coordinate the traffic control plan and location of the pedestrian crossings with District staff. Resolution Subdivision Page 6 14:25 MAY 09, 2000 TEL N0: (208) 387-6391 .-. .1 #2605 PAGE: 8i13 In order to provide safe turning movements into the driveways and streets on Overland Road and avoid a continuous meandering travel path a continuous turning lane is required from Locust Grove Road to the east property line. The design will provide turning movement at all driveways and streets through and including Locust Grove and new east -west street. O. ACHD's Park & Ride Division Staff have indicated the need for a park and ride location at the applicant's site. The District requests that applicant grant the District an easement for a 10 to 12 - space Park & Ride area at this site. Commuteride staff will contact the applicant to coordinate the location of the Park & Ride area. P. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that Tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Pat Nelson at 387-6160. Q. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, it is recommended that the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (T -MO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. R. A Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) is formed with a coordinator that works as a liaison between businesses and private and public transportation providers to increase the use of alternative transportation and other trip reduction measures (shuttle buses, bus pass programs, vanpools, carpools, bicycle and walking enhancements). An annual survey will be required of the TMA/TMO to monitor participation in alternative transportation programs and forwarded to the ACHD Commuteride Office. S. District policy states that direct access to arterials and collectors is normally restricted and that the developer shall try to use combined access points. In accordance with District policy the applicant should be required to provide a recorded cross access easement among the lots within the proposed subdivision for use to access the public streets prior to issuance of a building pennit (or other required permits). T. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Locust Grove Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. U. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Overland Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. V. Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with past action by the District the applicant should be required to pave all driveways their full width and at least 30 -feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Overland Road and Locust Grove Road and install pavement tapers with 15 -foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. W. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the undeveloped parcels abutting this site may be required upon review of a future application for this site. Resolution Subdivision Page 7 14:25 MAY 09, 2008 TEL N0: (208) 387-639;,—,42605 PAGE 9/13 r+ X. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, may be placed on future development of this parcel. Y. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the school parcel abutting this site should be ex. tended upon review of a future application for this site. Z. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will require improvement in order to accommodate the additional traffic generated by this proposed development. The Overland Road/Meridian Road intersection currently operates at deficient Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of the 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The reconstruction of the intersection by the District is not listed in ACHD's Five year Work Program. The following Site Specific Requirements and Standard Requirements must be met or provided for prior to ACHD approval of the final plat: Special Recommendation to City of Meridian: In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Ms Pat Nelson at 387-6160. 2. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) should be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. ACHD's Park & Ride Division Staff have indicated the need for a park and ride location at the applicant's site. The District requests that applicant grant the District an easement for a 10 to 12 -space Park & Ride area at this site. Commuteride staff will contact the applicant to coordinate the location of the Park & Ride area. 4. The transportation system will require improvement in order to accommodate the additional traffic generated by additional development. The Overland Road/1%leridian Road intersection currently operates at a deficient Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. Additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. The reconstruction of the Overland Road/Meridian Road Street intersection is not currently listed in ACHD's Five ,year Work Program. Resolution Subdivision Page 8 14:26 MAY 09, 2000 TEL NO: (208) 387-639;_-" r" #2605 PAGE 10113 Site Specific Requirements: Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Overland Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #193. 2. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #193. Provide a stub street to the south property line located 1,000 -feet west of the east property line. Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. 4. Provide a stub street to the east property line located 400 -feet south of Overland Road. Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD AWILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. Provide a $112,500.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for 75 -percent of the cost to construct a traffic signal on Overland Road for the new collector roadway. The District will construct the signal when it is warranted. Provide a $37,500.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for 25 -percent of the cost of constructing a traffic signal at the Overland Road/Locust Grove Road intersection. The District will construct the signal when it is warranted. 7. Provide a $52,800.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the parcel (approximately 2,640 -feet) prior to District approval of a final plat, whichever occurs first. Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel prior to District approval of a final plat. Locate the sidewalk two feet within the new right-of-way of Locust Grove Road. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. Resolution Subdivision Page 9 14:27 MAY 09, 2000 TEL N0: (208) 387-6391,-, ^ #2605 PAGE 11/13 9. Locate two driveways on Locust Grove Road as follows: ♦ The northern driveway shall be located 550 -feet south of Overland Road to align with Peacock Street to the west. ♦ The southern driveway shall be located 75 -feet north of the south property line. The driveways shall be constructed 30 to 35 -foot wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the roadway. Provide 100 -feet of stacking for both the inbound and out -bound travel lanes for the driveways. Coordinate the design of the driveways with District staff. 10. Locate three driveways on Overland Road as follows: ♦ 480 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 930 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 1,280 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 100 -feet of stacking for this driveway. The driveways shall be constructed 30 to 35 -feet wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the existing roadway edge. 11. Locate two public roads as follows: ♦ off Overland Road 320 -feet west of the east property line: locate driveways off this public street a minimum of 100 -feet south of Overland Road. The roadway shall be constructed as a 40 -foot street section with curbs gutters and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58 -feet of right-of-way. off Overland Road 850 -feet west of the east property line: driveways off this roadway shall be located a minimum of 175 -feet south of Overland Road and consecutive driveways are required to align or offset a minimum of 150 -feet. The roadway shall be constructed as a 46 -foot street section with curbs, gutters, and a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 64 -feet of right-of-way. The applicant shall be required to construct a signal for the roadway/Overland Road intersection. Coordinate the design of the signalized intersection with District staff. 12. Locate an east/west road 400 -feet south of Overland Road: locate driveways on the east/west roadway a minimum of 50 -feet from a public street intersection. The traffic circle within the roadway shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 29 -feet wide street section around the traffic circle. A YIELD sign shall be installed at all approaches into the island and a directional island shall be constructed in the street approaches to the traffic circle to guide motorists in the proper direction. The pedestrian crossings shall be located at the intersection to improve pedestrian/veMcular recognition and safety. Coordinate the design of the buffer circle, the traffic control plan and location of the pedestrian crossings with District staff. 13. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, shall be placed on future development of this parcel. Resolution Subdivision Page 10 14 28 MAY 09, 2008 TEL N0: (208) 387-639x, #2605 PAGE: 12/13 14. Construct a center turn lane on Overland Road abutting the entire site. 15. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the school parcel abutting this site should be extended upon review of a future application for this site. 16. Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Overland Road and Locust Grove Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. Standard Requirements: A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity. The written request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a m on the day scheduled for ACHD Co,nimission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its original decision. The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACRD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 5. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), wluch incorporates any required design changes. 6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. Resolution Subdivision Page 11 14:28 MAY 09, 2000 �-. TEL N0: (208) 387-639Y-, #2605 PAGE 13113 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACRD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 8. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 9. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusion of Law: ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development Division at 387-6170. Submitted by: Commission Action: Planning and Development Staff May 3, 2000 Resolution Subdivision Page 12 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING: Avril 11, 2000 APPLICANT: G.L. VOIGT ITEM NUMBER: 1-6 REQUEST: RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK - ALL SIX PROJECTS AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING & ZONING DEPT. CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WASTE WATER DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: AWAITING COMMENTS +J� ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: SANITARY SERVICE: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING: April 11, 2000 APPLICANT; G.L. VOIGT ITEM NUMBER: 1-6 REQUEST: RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK -ALL SIX PROJECTS AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING & ZONING DEPT. CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WASTE WATER DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: COMMENTS 4 '1 H I ", 1 � I i MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: - • ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: -A MMENTS Woo ;K— \ ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITT i2ctLi4eGt 7-9-Cti-ew CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: SANITARY SERVICE: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. sent By: city ort Meridian; 2088886854; Apr -11-00 12:16PM; Page 1 RECE F YV-E� f Y � ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT APR 1 1 2000 �A Planning and Development Division Development Application Report CITY OF MERIDIAN Preliminary Plat— Resolution Business Park Locust Grove Rd/Overland Road An application for a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City of Meridian for a 17 -lot residential and commercial subdivision on 107.06 -acres. The applicant is also requesting conditional use and rezone approval. The City has forwarded the application to ACRD for review and comment. The site is located at the southeast corner of Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. This development is estimated to generate 9,430 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic study. Roads impacted by this development: Locust Grove Road m Overland Road ACHD Commission Datc April 12, 2000 (Tentative) - 12:00 p.m. rzceivec. 3-31-oo APR 11 100 13:18 GI RDN EP, Resolullon 54)bdi%inion Page 1 208RRRRRS4 pony a1 ' 1 r� rzceivec. 3-31-oo APR 11 100 13:18 GI RDN EP, Resolullon 54)bdi%inion Page 1 208RRRRRS4 pony a1 Sent By: City Or meridian; IN ■■I ■ a elk, own INTERSTATE 84 I -L MERIDIAN CITY r LIMITS BOUNDARY RT GG 2088886854; Apr -11-00 12:15PM; Page 2 N i PROPOSED R1 RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION CG R-4 R1 r j RT � RT i soo 0 500 1000 Fast I -4 BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. PROPOSED REZONE REVISION BRIGGS RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20. T.3N., R. 1E., B.M., C208) U4..o7W MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY. IDAHO 9++E� 1 OF 1 IAW W. OVERLAND AOAD O"ON DRAFT $CALE DATE Owc. NO. BOISE IDAHO 03705 wo 1' 900 ozwm0 0101 )ol0l,APR APR 11 '00 13.18 2088886854 PAGE.02 By: City OT Meridian; 2088886854; Apr -11-00 12:17PM; L-lift Alm qgup Page 3 FIGURE 3 RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC YR. 2005 I is 4 ADT -9- AVERAGE AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC Tromu sway yr p r d 8)c DOME ENGINEERINIC. INC, m "Wo,r,. l airs o o Sig -ma APR 11 '00 13:1e 2088886854 PAGE.03 sent By: City OT Meridian; 2088886854; West Ada - Impact Fee Service Area Meridian - Impact Fee Assessment District r ,Locust Grove Road Minot- arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count 3,552 on 7-16-99 A -Existing Level of Service C -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 950 -feet of frontage 50 to 70-fect existing right-of-way (25 -feet frotn centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feel from centerline) Apr -11-00 12:17PM; Page 4 Locust Grove Road is improved with two lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. The segment of Locust Grove Road abutting the site is not listed in the current Five Year Work Program for reconstruction. yn •,af ,r:,r -Overland Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count 13,551 on 11-30-99 D -Existing Level of Service [-Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 2,640-1eet of frontage 50 to 70 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feel from centerline) Overland 0 is improved with two lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. The segment of locust Grove Road abutting the site is listed in the current hive Year Work Program for reconstruction to 5 -lane in FY (2004). RcsoRuion Subdivision P,e 2 APR 11 100 13:18 2088886854 PAGE.04 Facts and Findings: A. General Information Owner — G.L Voigt Applicant - Same R-4, RT - Existing zoning L-0, C -G - Requested zoning 107.06 - Acres 17 - Proposed lots 200 - Proposed multi -family dwelling units 346,000 - Square feet of proposed building 125,000 -square feet of Office building a : 145,000 -square feet of Retail building 57,000 -square feet of an ice Rink 19,000 -square feet of Day Care Center 2,300 - Total lineal feet of proposed public streets 286 - Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) West Ada - Impact Fee Service Area Meridian - Impact Fee Assessment District r ,Locust Grove Road Minot- arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count 3,552 on 7-16-99 A -Existing Level of Service C -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 950 -feet of frontage 50 to 70-fect existing right-of-way (25 -feet frotn centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feel from centerline) Apr -11-00 12:17PM; Page 4 Locust Grove Road is improved with two lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. The segment of Locust Grove Road abutting the site is not listed in the current Five Year Work Program for reconstruction. yn •,af ,r:,r -Overland Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count 13,551 on 11-30-99 D -Existing Level of Service [-Existing plus project build -out Level of Service 2,640-1eet of frontage 50 to 70 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feel from centerline) Overland 0 is improved with two lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. The segment of locust Grove Road abutting the site is listed in the current hive Year Work Program for reconstruction to 5 -lane in FY (2004). RcsoRuion Subdivision P,e 2 APR 11 100 13:18 2088886854 PAGE.04 sent By: City OT Meridian; 2088886854; Apr -11-00 12:17PM; Page 5 blue Tick Strect/Rrandys Jewel Street Local streets with no bike lane designation No traffic count available 50 -feet of frontage �• 50 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline) 50 -feet required right-of-way for their extensions Blue Tick Street and Brandys Jewel Street arc improved as 37 -foot street section with curb, gutter and sidewalk. r B. On March 27, 2000, the District Planning and Development staff inspected this site and evaluated the transportation system in the vicinity. On March 31, 2000, the staffme t as the District's Technical Review Committee and reviewed the impacts of this proposed development on the District's transportation system. The results of that analysis constitute the following Facts and Findings and recommended Site Specific Requirements. C. Overland Road has 3,522 existing vehicle trips per day, which is a Level of Serviced LOS�Rk). An acceptable Level of Service for this segment of roadway is D (LOS D) or 14,000 vehicle trips per day. The proposed application will add approximately 3,000 vehicle trips per day on .Locust Grove Road. r w� D. Current traffic counts indicate that Overland Road. carries 13,551 vehicle trips perday (VTD). The planning threshold for Overland Road is 14, 000 VDT with its current configuration. When Overland Road is rebuilt to five lanes, the planning threshold for Overland Road wilt be 33,000 VTD. The proposed application will add approximately 6,000 vehicle trips per day on Overland 0-4 Road, therefore the existing, plus project traffic exceeds the planning threshold of Overland Road with its current configuration. When Overland Road is rebuilt to five -lanes, the roadway will be adequate to accommodate the traffic generated from this site. E. The Eagle Road/Overland Road intersection operates at a Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of the 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The subject site's additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. f• UnIft The Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection operates at a Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of the 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The subject site's additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. G. A traffic study was submitted for the Resolution Subdivision site devclopittent plan. The key findings of the traffic study include the following: • The proposed development is expected to generate 12,405 total daily vehicle trips. An estimated 3,045 trips are pass -by trips, leaving 9,430 new daily vehicle trips added to the adjacent roadway system. • The Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection currently operates at Level of Service (LOS) F. Because Meridian Road is a principal arterial, LOS E is acceptable under �•,; current District policy. The intersection exceed the allowable Lcvcl of Service. .AtMY Resoluiiou Subdivisjon Pape 3 APR 11 '00 13:19 2088886854 PAGE.05 Sent By: City oT Meridian; 2088886854; Apr -11-00 12:18PM; Page 6 • Under "existing plus project" traffic volumes (Year 2005), the Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection is expected to operate at Level of Service (LOS) F. The District has Fly�Y currently programmed a project to upgrade Overland Road to create additional capacity. The design and magnitude of the improvements have not yet been determined. Because Meridian Road is a principal arterial, LOS E is acceptable under current District policy. • The Locust Grove Road/Overland Road intersection currently operates at an overall Level of Service (LOS) A. The intersection is STOP controlled only on the two Locust Grove Road approaches. Left turns from Locust grove operate at an LOS F Condition. if a traffic signal were constructed with the existing traffic volumes and roadway geometry, the intersection would operate at an overall LOS of B. rnw t • Under the existing traffic volumes, both Overland Road and Locust Grove Road operate at an arterial LOS of A with volume -to -capacity ratios of less than 0.35 during peak hour conditions. • The Year 2020 traffic forecast of 18,000 vehicles per day for Overland Road indicate the need to widen the roadway from two to three travel lane. • The Year 2020 traffic forecast of 8,700 vehicles per day for Locust Grove Road do not indicate the need to widen the roadway from two to three travel lane. • The forecast traffic volumes at the Locust Grove Road intersection with Overland Road justify a traffic signal under existing plus project traffic volumes. • The remaining main site driveways and public street intersections on Overland Road are expected to have traffic volumes low enough that traffic signals are not needed. • The main site driveway intersections on Locust Grove Road arc expected to have traffic volumes low enough that traffic signals are not needed. • All the intersections on Locust Grove Road will require the construction of a center turn lane. • All the intersections on Overland Road will require the construction of a center turn lane. The applicant is proposing a stub street to the south property line located 1,000 -feet west of the east property line_ District Staff supports location of the stub street. The applicant should provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub with a temporary casement provided «,. to the District. T he applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN'rHE FU"PURE". Coordinate the sign `vy plan for the stub street, and the design of tic turnaround with District staff, 1. The applicant is proposing a stub street to the cast property line located 400 -feet south of Overland Road. District Staff"supports location of the stub street. The applicant should provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. '1- he applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the roadway staring that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN 'FHE FtJ URt -'. Coordinate the sign plan for the stuh street, anti the design of the tumarourtd with District staff 1. District policy requires the applicant to provide a $52,800.00 deposit to the PUhlic Righis-uf= Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the parcel (approximately 2,640 -feet) prior to District approval ol'a final plat, whichever - occurs First. RcsoIL16011 Subdivision Pa -e 4 APR 11 '00 13:19 2o9eee6854 PAGE.06 sent By: city of Meridian; 2088886854; Apr -11-00 12:18PM; Page 7/13 r- K. District policy requires the applicant to construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel prior to District approval of a final plat. L. The applicant is proposing two driveways on i.ocust Grove Road. The driveways are located as Ur follows: • The northern driveway is proposed to be located. 440 -feet. south of Overland Road. • The southem driveway is proposed to be located 690 -feet south of Overland Road. Peacock Street is located approximately 550 -feet south of Overland Road and Labrador Street is located approximately 1,100 -feet south of Overland Road. Distnct policy requires the applicant to locate driveways on Locust Grove Road a minimum of 440 -feet south of Overland Road for and 220 -feet from the streets on the west side of the roadway. The applicant's proposed driveways do not meet the required offset from Peacock Street on the west side of the roadway. The applicant should be required to located the northern driveway to align with Peacock Street to west, and the southern driveway should be located 75 -feet north of the south property line. The driveways should be constructed 30 to 35 -foot wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the roadway. The applicant should be required to provide 100 -feet of stacking for both the inbound and out -bound travel lanes for the driveway. Coordinate the design of the driveways with District staff. M. The applicant is proposing three driveways on Overland Road. The driveways are located as follows: • 480 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. • 930 -feel east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. • 1,280 -feet cast of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of stacking for this driveway. All the driveways align with existing driveways on the north side of the road. Disa-ict policy requires that driveways on Overland Road be located a minimum of 440 -feet from the Locust Grove Road/Overland Road intersection and aligned or offset 230 -feet from existing driveways on Overland Road. The proposed driveways meet District policy. The driveways should be constructed 30 to 35-11cet with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the existing roadway cd,,.c, N. The applicant is proposing to construct two public roads off Overland Road, The roads are proposed to be located: RuSU111001) Subdivision Pagc 5 APR 11 '00 13:20 2088886854 PAGE.07 sent By: city of Meridian; 2088886854; Apr -11-00 12:18PM; Page 8/13 • 320 -feet west of the east property line: based on the submitted traffic study the �.� applicant should be required to located driveways off this public street a minimurn of 100 -feet south of Overland Road. The roadway should be constricted as a 40 -foot street section with curbs gutters and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58 -feet of right-of-way. • 850 -feel west of the east property line: based on the submitted traffic study this roadway should be signalized and driveways on this roadway should be located a minimum of 175 -feet suuth of Overland Road and consecutive driveways should be required to.align or offset a minimum of 150 -feet. The roadway should be constructed as a 46 -foot street section with curbs, gutters, and a 5 - foot wide concrete sidewalk within 64 -feet of right-of-way. This road should be signalized. The applicant should be required to construct a signal 1br the roadway/Overland Road intersection. Coordinate the design of the signalized y intersection with District staff. • The applicant is proposing an east/wet road located 400 -feet south of Overland Road: the applicant should be required to locate driveways on the cast/west roadway a minimum of 50 -feet from a public street intersection. The applicant is proposing a traffic circles within the roadway. The street section around the traffic circle should be constructed of 29 -feet back-to-back. A YIELD sign should be installed at all approaches into the islands and directional islands �should be constructed in the street approaches to the traffic circles to guide motorists in the proper direction. The pedestrian crossings shall be located at «� the intersection to improve pedestrian/vehicular recognition and safety. i Coordinate the traffic control plan and location of the pedestrian crossings with District staff. O. ACHD's Park & Ride Division Staff have indicated the need for a park and ride location at the applicant's site. The District requests that applicant grant the District an easement for a 10 to 12 - space Park & Ride area at this site. Commuteride staff will contact the applicant to coordinate the location of the Park & Ride area. P. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that Tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Coin ill uteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Pat Nelson at 387-6160. ��. 1n order to reduce trips to and from this development, it is recommended that the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is fornned with a boundary that includes this site: or is adjacent to this dcvclupment. R. A Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Trinsporration Nlan;iocment Organisation (TMO) is formed with a coordinator that %-,orks as a liaison between businesses and private and public transportation providers to increase thr use of alternative transportation and other trip reduction measures (shuttle buses, bus pass programs, vanpools, carpools, bicycle and walking Resolution Subdivision P3,,e G APR 11 '00 13:20 2088886854 PAGE.08 Sent By: City of Meridian; 2088886854; Apr -11-00 12:19PM; MAN z' ,.r.f Page 9/13 enhancements). An annual survey will be required of the TIVIAfI'MO to monitor participation in alternative transportation programs and forwarded to the ACHD Commuteride Office. S. District policy states that direct access to arterials and collectors is nonnally restricted and that the developer shall try to use combined access points. In accordance with District policy the applicant should be required to provide a recorded cross access easement among the lots within the proposed subdivision for use to access the public streets prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits). T. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Locust Grove Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. U. The applicant should be required to constntct a center turn lane on Overland Road abutting the entire site. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. V. Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with past action by the District the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30 -feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Overland Road and Locust Grove Road and install pavement tapers with 15 -foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. W. in accordance with District policy, stub streets to the undeveloped parcels abutting this site may be required upon review of a future application for this site. X. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, may be placed on future development of this parcel. Y. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the school parcel abutting this site should be extended upon review of a future application for this site. Z. Based on development patterns in this area and the resulting tragic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will require improvement in order to accommodate the additional traffic generated by this proposed development. The Overland Road/Meridian Road intersection signal currently operates at deficient Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of the 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The reconstruction of the interscetion by the District is not listed in ACI-1D's Five year Work program. The following Site Specific Requirements and Standard Requirements must be met or provided for prior to ACHD approval of the final plat: Special Recommendation to Seiw Citv: In order to reduce trips to and from this devel0Pnle11r it is recommended (hal tenants occupying the proposal building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACI ID on employee participation. Conlmureride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more m inforation contact Ms. Pat Nelson at 337-6160. APR 11 '00 13:20 Resolution suhdi0sion Paoe 7 2088886854 PAGE.09 Sent By: City of Meridian; 2088886854; Apr -11-00 12:19PM; Page 10/13 2. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, the tenants occupying the proposed 4u building(s) should be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary �•�+ that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. 3. The transportation system will require improvement in order to accommodate the additional traffic generated by additional development. The Overland Road/Meridian Road intersection signal currently operates at a deficient )Level of Service F (LOS w), and is listed as one of the 100 critical intersections in Ada County. Additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. The reconstruction of the Overland Road/Orchard Street intersection is not listed in ACHD's Five year Work Program. Site Specific Requirements: I . Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Overland Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-uf-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. 'The owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing night - of -way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of ;; w application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section a 15 of ACf1D Ordinance # 193. 2. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required pen -nits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. Te owner w' be comp ' * t or this addition -of-way at. is a local street an Brough opted stanch h th velopers utting eTties Provide a stub street to the south property line located 1,000 -feet west of the east property line. Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. Install it sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE f-UT•URE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the: design of the turnaround with District staff, 4. Provide a stub street to the east property Iine located 400 -feet south of Overland Road. Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end ofthe stub with a temporary easement provided to the District. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL. RE EXTENDE=D IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff. 5. Provide a $52,800.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of- constructing fconstructing a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the parcel _ (approximately 2,640 -feet) prior to District approval of a final plat, whichever occurs first. Resolution Subdivision Pa.ue Z APR 11 '00 13:21 2088886854 PAGE.10 sent By: City oT Meridian; 2088886854; Apr -11-00 12:20PM; Page 11/13 r 6. Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel prior to District approval of final plat. Locate the sidewalk two feet within the new right-of-way of Locust Grove Road. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. aeaaa'p ,N wlm� 7. Locate two driveways on Locust Grove Road as follows: „mow. -r-0 MSW ♦ The northern driveway is shall be located 550 -feet south of Overland Road to align with Peacock Street to the west. ♦ The southern driveway is proposed to be located 75 -feet north of the south property line. The driveways shall be constructed 30 to 35 -foot wide with 15-fuut radii pavement tapers abutting the roadway. Provide 100 -feet of stacking for both the inbound and out -bound travel lanes for the driveways. Coordinate the design of the driveways with District staff. 8. Locate three driveways on Overland Road as follows: • 480 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 930 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this driveway. ♦ 1,280 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 100 -feet of stacking for this driveway. The driveways shall be constructed 30 to 35 -feet with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the existing roadway edge. 9. Locate two public roads off Overland Road as follows: ♦ 320 -feet west of the east property line: located driveways off this public street a minimum of 100 -feet south of Overland Road. The roadway shall be constructed as a 40 -Coot street section with curbs gutters and 5 foot wide concrete sidewalks within 58 -feet of right-of-way. ♦ 850 -feel west of the east property line: driveways off this roadway shall be located a minimum of 175 -feet south of Overland Road and consecutive driveways should be required to align or offset a minimum of 150 -feet. The roadway shall be constructed as a 46 -foot street section with curbs, gutters, and a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 64 -feet of right-of-way. The applicant shall be required to construct a signal for the roadway/Overland Road intersection. Coordinate the design of the sipnalizcd intersection with District staff ♦ Locate an east/ et -oad 400-11eet south of Overland Road: locate driveways on the east/west roadway a mininuun of -50 feet from a public street intersection. The traffic circle within the roadway shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 29 -feet back-to-back street section around the traffic circle. A YIELD sign shall be installed at .ill approaches into the island and a directional island shall be constructed in the street approaches to the traffic circle to guide Resolution SubdiOsinn Paue'1) APR 11 '00 13:21 2oesee6854 PAGE.11 sent By: City of Meridian; 2088886854; Apr -11-00 12:20PM; Page 12/13 �. � 10. motorists in the proper direction. The pedestrian crossings shall be located at The intersection to improve pedestrian/vchicttlar recognition and safety. Coordinate the traffic control plan and location of the pedestrian crossings with District staff. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, shall be placed on future development of this parcel. 11. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the school parcel abutting this site should be extended upon review of a future application for this site. .aroma •r»• 12. Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Overland Road and Locust Grove Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. x Standard Requirements: 1. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a wrist n eYplanation of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inen,uity. The w•ntten request shall be submi ted to the District no later than 9-00-a.m. on the day seheduled for ACHD Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the p Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. After ACED Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action r shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall r specifically identify each reguiruucnt to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the ornmission at the time of its original decision The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the nett regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. Payment of applicable road impact lees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance f#193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. Resolution Subdo inion Page 10 APR 11 100 13=22 2085886854 PAGE.12 sent By: City o7 Meridian; 2088886854; Apr -11-00 12:20PM; Page 13/13 .�M " ',", 5. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit , (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 6. Construction, use and property development shall be in confonnance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DiGLiNE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of constriction. S. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing 40 and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 9. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusion of Law: 1. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity l'<x impacted by the proposed development. e.. '7;-0 Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development Division at 387-6170. r '1vc.A 'mak. Submitted by: COm"'isslon Action: Planning and Development Staff Resolution Subdivision Pace t APR 11 100 13:22 2088886854 PAGE.13 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING: March 22 2000 APPLICANT: G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT ITEM NUMBER: 1 REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 16.119 ACRES FROM RT TO CG FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING & ZONING DEPT. CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WASTEWATER DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: COMMENTS SEE SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET COMMENTS COMING SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: SANITARY SERVICE: OTHER: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS �H rA� V' n j All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. SU136dVISION EVALUATION Sk.BEET Proposed Development Name Resolution Subdivision File # Date Reviewed 3/1/00 Preliminary Stage Final XX Engineer/Developer Briggs Engineering. Becky Bowcut 7 N MAR - 7 2000 The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Boise City Street Name Ordinance. The following streets are existing and the names shall appear on the plat: "OVERLAND RD." and "S. LOCUST GROVE RD." The following street names are approved for this development and shall be placed on the reserved list: "S. CELEBRATION AVE." "E. GALA ST." "E. Y2K LANE" and " S. RESOLUTION LANE" The name "MILLENNIUM" is on the reserved list for another development. Please choose another name. The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE Ie=iGEP1)CY RE�hESENTATIVES OR DESIGNEES Ada County Engineer John PriesterDate Community Planning Assoc. Sue Hansen Date :J4/1 /0-a City of Meridian Cheryl Sable Date _ 3 -2 -1-4- 1 Meridian Fire District Representative t � 0'D�ate 3,3-00 NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed 1111 Sub Index Street Index Section NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS e,Ikfiu� . 16,;, TR%SUMSM_CITY.FRM SUBljiVISION EVALUATION Sr -&ET Proposed Development Name Resolution Subdivision File # Date Reviewed 1/11/00 Preliminary Stage XX Final Engineer/Developer Briggs Engineering Becky Bowcut r,-BCU'1-\T',1) MAR — 7 2000 C11T CtshIiIUN, The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Boise City Street Name Ordinance. The following streets are existing and the names shall appear on the plat: "OVERLAND RD." and "S. LOCUST GROVE RD." The following street names are approved for this development and shall be placed on the "S. MILLENNIUM WAY" S. C_ ELEBRATION AVE." "E. GALA ST." "E. Y2K LANE" and The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE,/APENPY RP�kESENTATIVES OR DESIGNEES Ada County Engineer John Priestei Community Planning Assoc. Sue Hansen City of Meridian Meridian Fire District Cheryl Sable Representati, Date Date / -/3- od Date 1-13-D d Date 1_1( - o NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat', otherwise the plat will not be signed 1111 Subindex Street Index Section NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS O/L-Li/ 1/31eq0 TR\SUBS1SM_CITY.FRM p (- �- BRIGGS ENGINEERING Inc. 1800 West Overland RoadS"'' ENGINEERS /PLANNERS /SURVEYORS Voice Idaho 83705 — 3142 MAR - 7 2000 (208) 344-9700 Fax (208) 345-2950 E-mail BEI-Idaho@msn.com C'I F r';�EPUB AN January 3, 2000 Ms. Sue Hansen APA Mapping 650 Main Street Boise, Idaho 83702 Re: Reservation of Street Names Proposed G.L. Voigt Development Dear Anne: Please review the following street names for a parcel located in the NW '/4, Section 20, 13N., R IE. 1. Millennium Way 2. Gala Street 3. Celebration Avenue c 4. Resolution Lane (Private) 5. Y2K Lane (Private) Sincerely, BRIGGS ENGINEERING, Inc. Becky L. Bowcutt Land Use Planner 990123\Stmame M r I I l N oriTED I ( 1 1 � --% / � 1 -- .J, l `, (SEE rt - •126) Ali a°�a° a°sg : SAXFg6> Egg fi_�lq x ;oa "g• gE�.gi � [•o �$ t�� g o c� §§§� a"s `Y.ia 4 § _ • 8 �t xf Ka wi i •• 1 a -'� 1C. gg CQ p N RESOLUTION § §E mc PSUBD'VISIONT ig ✓a {� 5 0 �7_� 4r <I SUPERINTENDENT Christine H. Donnell March 1, 2000 Joint School District No. 2 911 Meridian Street • Meridian, Idaho 83642 • (208) 888-6701 • Fax (208) 888-6700 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Councilmen: MAR ' 6 2000 CITE' OF IVIERIDIAN Enclosed for your review is general information relative to schools located in the proposed project area. If you have any questions, please contact Jim Carberry at 888-6701. Reference: Resolution Plaza Apartment Complex & Commercial Development Elementary School: Mary McPherson Elementary School Middle School: Lewis & Clark Middle School High School: Meridian High School Comments and/or Recommendations: Mary McPherson Elementary School is at capacity. Lewis & Clark Middle is currently under construction and is scheduled to open in the Fall of 2000. Meridian High School is over capacity. Joint School District No. 2 would like to see a secondary access to the North of the school site. According to the plat there is only one entrance to the High School Site from the North. Sincerely, Jim Carberry, Administrator of Support Services 11 Preparing Today's O11Z1 0 Students For Tomorrow's Challenges. ops P•�Qgle. c Me6d`O� SUPERINTENDENT Christine H. Donnell March 1, 2000 Joint School District No. 2 911 Meridian Street • Meridian, Idaho 83642 • (208) 888-6701 • Fax (208) 888-6700 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Councilmen: MAR ' 6 2000 CITE' OF IVIERIDIAN Enclosed for your review is general information relative to schools located in the proposed project area. If you have any questions, please contact Jim Carberry at 888-6701. Reference: Resolution Plaza Apartment Complex & Commercial Development Elementary School: Mary McPherson Elementary School Middle School: Lewis & Clark Middle School High School: Meridian High School Comments and/or Recommendations: Mary McPherson Elementary School is at capacity. Lewis & Clark Middle is currently under construction and is scheduled to open in the Fall of 2000. Meridian High School is over capacity. Joint School District No. 2 would like to see a secondary access to the North of the school site. According to the plat there is only one entrance to the High School Site from the North. Sincerely, Jim Carberry, Administrator of Support Services CENTRAL CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARP-TENT •• DISTRICT Environmental Health Division �U HEALTH DEPARTMENT Rezone # 14 Z co q Conditional Use # Preliminary / Final / Short Plat �� a D / � T` � a'✓ .IIS c. S � .✓ e S S �.�i-K Return to: ❑ Boise ❑ Eagle ❑ Garden City ;Meridian ❑ Kuna ❑ ACz �j I. We have No Objections to this Proposal. MAR 6 2000 ❑ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. CITY OF NERID ; ❑ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ❑ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ❑ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ❑ high seasonal ground water ❑ waste flow characteristics ❑ or bedrock from original grade ❑ other ❑ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. ❑ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and [DHD 10/91 rcb, rev. 1/91 Review Sheet water availability. ❑ 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ❑ central sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water well ❑ interim sewage ❑ central water ❑ individual sewage ❑ individual water ❑ 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: ❑ central sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water ❑ sewage dry lines ❑ central water ❑ 10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ❑ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ❑ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ❑ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ❑ food establishment ❑ swimming pools or spas ❑ child care center ❑ beverage establishment ❑ grocery store 14. �D o�� Ucs��ov✓ .�?.✓yr'xr+T:c� �J > Zo.,.c� ti �+ -� Date: a-/ .2— C5 Reviewed By: [DHD 10/91 rcb, rev. 1/91 Review Sheet MAYOR Robert D. Corrie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tammy deWeerd Cherie McCandless HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208)887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 MEMORANDUM: March 20, 2000 To: Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council P __/ VED From: Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Technician MAR 2 0 2000 Brad Hawkins -Clark, Planner34r- City of Meridian Christy Richardson, Planner City Clerk Office. Re: - Request for a Annexation and Zoning of 16.1 Acres from R -T to C -G by Overland, L.L.C. (File AZ -00-004) - Rezone of 37.6 Acres from R-4 to L -O by G.L. Voigt (File RZ-00-003) - Preliminary Plat of 107.06 Acres by G.L. Voigt (File PP -00-006) - Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Commercial Development (RESOLUTION PLAZA) consisting of Multi -Family, Commercial, Office and LDS Seminary in the proposed L -O and C -G Zones (File CUP -00-017) - Conditional Use Permit for a 200 Unit Luxury Apartment Complex by Desert West Properties, L.L.C. (File CUP -00-015) - Conditional Use Permit for a 86,160 Square Foot Ice Arena by Pat McKeegan (File CUP -00-016) We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATIONS SUMMARY There are six (6) separate applications covered in this report, each addressed separately after the summary. Five of the applications are associated with two parcels and propose a Planned Commercial Development (PD -C), generally located at the SE corner of Overland and South Locust Grove Roads. The sixth application (preliminary plat) also includes a 55 -acre parcel to the south of the PD -C owned by the Meridian School District and site of a future high school. The PD -C proposed uses include retail, office, an LDS Seminary, a 1,430 -seat ice hockey arena (two rinks), a daycare and a 200 -unit luxury apartment complex. The annexation application applies only to the 16 -acre parcel west of the Hunter Lateral. The rezone application applies only to the 37.64 -acre parcel south of Overland and east of the Hunter. Since ACHD has not yet submitted a report on the Preliminary Plat or three (3) CUP applications, Staff is recommending these four (4) applications be continued or tabled. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 Resolution Plaza.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 2 LOCATION The property is generally located at the SE corner of Overland Road and South Locust Grove Road with approximately %2 mile of frontage along Overland. The future high school parcel is currently land -locked and directly south of the 36 -acre parcel. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North — R.V. park, Cesco (John Deere), Transport, Truck & Trailers, future location of Treasure Valley Music, and two vacant parcels. All are zoned C -G (Meridian). South — An LDS church is currently being constructed on the Ada County parcel immediately south of the Overland, LLC parcel fronting on Locust Grove. Rim View Subdivision, zoned R1 in Ada County, is south of the church. Raven Hill and Los Alamitos Subdivision, zoned R4 (Meridian), lie south of the school parcel. East — Several large, vacant parcels currently in agricultural use are east of the subject parcels. All are zoned RT (Ada County). West — Several phases of Sportsman Pointe Subdivision, zoned R4, lies across Locust Grove Road to the west. There is also an unplatted, triangular shaped parcel at the SW corner of the intersection that is not in City limits, zoned RT (Ada Co.), with a single family residence. CURRENT OWNERS OF RECORD Gary L. Voigt is the property owner of the 37.6 acre parcel. Craig Groves and Greg Johnson (Overland LLC) are the owners of the 16.1 acre parcel. Meridian Joint School District No. 2 is the owner of the 55 acre parcel. All owners have submitted consent to be a part of these applications. GENERAL COMMENTS/OVERVIEW (All Applications) 1. The 1993 Meridian Comprehensive Plan was amended by Resolution 4266 (File CPA -99- 005) for the Voigt and Overland LLC parcels from Single Family Residential to Mixed/Planned Use Development on 11-16-99 by action of the City Council. Under the amended Mixed Use designation, the proposed uses are permitted. 2. The applicant has proposed a tentative phasing plan consisting of four levels of priority: Phase I - Ice Hockey Facility (Construction anticipated in year 2000) Phase II - Apartment Complex Site `B" (Construction anticipated in year 2001) Phase III - Office/Retail Site "C" (Schedule dependent on tenant sales) Phase IV - Commercial/Office Site "A" (Applicant anticipates that this corner will not develop until the Locust Grove overpass is constructed.) NOTE: The Final Plat must be recorded prior to issuance of any building permits or Certificates of Zoning Compliance. 3. The Meridian School District will be a party to the preliminary plat at the City's request. The Meridian School District does not support nor oppose the Resolution Plaza project. It should be noted that the School District plans a High School on their 54.99 acre site. Development of the school site is contingent on a bond issue. The school district has indicated that a bond AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 3 issue for the high school will be submitted for a vote in the fall of 2000. If approved, construction of the school will take place in 2001. 4. On July 19, 1999, the APA (COMPASS) Board of Directors moved the proposed Locust Grove/I-84 overpass from the Destination 2020 Plan (soft projection) to the Transportation Improvement Plan (hard planning document). APA projects a dramatic increase in traffic for South Locust Grove when the overpass is constructed and they support a transportation management plan be developed for this project to coordinate the commuter needs of future residents and employees. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (All Applications) 1 • Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for non- domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements. 4. Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 5. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 6. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section. 7. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 8. Provide five -foot -wide sidewalks in accordance,with City Ordinance. 9. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 4 ANNEXATION & ZONING REQUIREMENTS (File AZ -00-004) The legal description submitted in the application appears to meet the requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission. The parcel is contiguous to the existing corporate city limits of Meridian. 2. Staff agrees with the Applicant's forecast that the Overland/Locust Grove area will become a major intersection, especially with the construction of the I-84/Locust Grove overpass. Staff also agrees that neighborhood commercial services are needed in this area to service the existing residential subdivisions and proposed apartment complex residents. However, we do not support the proposed C -G zone. Staff recommends a lower -intensity commercial zone, Neighborhood Commercial (C -N). All of the proposed uses listed in item #10 of the application (retail,. day care, and office) are permitted either outright or with a CUP in both the C -N and C -G. But there are several uses permitted in the C -G that are prohibited in the C -N, including auto repair, service stations, hotels, truck stops, heavy equipment sales and auto sales lots. Given the previously stated concerns of the Sportsman Pointe and Los Alamitos residents and the increased number of children in the apartment complex, Staff feel the down -zoned C -N is a more appropriate zone and will adequately meet the development intentions of the Applicant. 3. The subject lots can be adequately served by public facilities, and the proposed uses will allow for orderly expansion of the city limits. 4. A Development Agreement will be required as a condition of annexation Annexation Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the annexation but denial of the requested C -G zone. We recommend C -N zoning. REZONE REQUIREMENTS (File RZ-00-003) The legal description submitted in the application appears to meet the requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission. 2. Staff agrees with the proposed Limited Office (L -O) zone. It is the most appropriate zone for the proposed mixed uses within the Planned Development. The subject lot can be adequately served by public facilities, and the proposed uses will allow for orderly expansion of the city limits. 4. A Development Agreement will be required as a condition of rezone. Rezone Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the rezone with the requested L -O zone. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Pla AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Em Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 5 PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL COMMENTS (File PP -00-006) 1. Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 2. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. Assessment fees for water and sewer service are determined during the building plan review process. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Re -Assessment Agreement with the City of Meridian for all commercial uses. An assessment agreement is a vehicle that protects the City of Meridian and the Developer in the event that estimated assessments are not in line with actual usages. The agreement provides for reimbursement to the developer for over payment of assessments and payment to the City of Meridian of any shortfall in assessments. The overpayment/shortfall is determined after adequate historical usage. PRLIMINARY PLAT REQUIREMENTS (File PP -00-006) Sanitary sewer service to this site will be via extensions from the Five Mile Trunk that is currently under construction by this applicant. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline. 2. Water service to this site will be via extensions from newly constructed mains under the interstate, and from extensions of existing mains installed in adjacent developments. Applicant will be responsible to construct the water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Please provide the Public works department with information on anticipated fire flow and domestic water requirements for the proposed site. Water service to this development is contingent upon positive results from a hydraulic analysis by our computer model. Flow and pressure from the existing mains should be monitored with the Meridian Water Department. 3. Two -hundred -fifty- and 100 -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 4. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on site. Please submit hook-up and design details based on the proposed landscaping. Due to the size of landscaped area, primary water supply connection to the City's mains will not be allowed. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 6 5. Applicant has not indicated whether the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and maintained by an association or the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. If the system is being proposed as a private system, plans and specifications for the irrigation system shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department as part of the development plan. review process. A draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system O&M manual must be submitted prior to plan approval. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area. 6. Show all existing easements for irrigation/drainage facilities located within the boundaries of this proposed development (i.e. Hunter Lateral easements). 7. Detailed landscape plans for the Overland Road and Locust Grove Road landscape frontage buffers and for street landscaping along Millenium Way and Celebration Avenue shall be submitted for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat application. This requirement does not include interior lot landscaping. Interior landscaping will be dealt with on a site by site review basis with future CUP applications. A letter of credit or cash surety will be required for the improvements prior to signature on the Final Plat. 8. Staff recommends the Overland and Locust Road landscape buffers be platted as separate common lots within the subdivision and maintenance be the responsibility of the Development Committee/Association. The draft CC&Rs submitted with the application states each separate lot owner in the subdivision will be responsible for construction, installation and maintenance of landscaping on each building site. By placing responsibility for the arterial landscape buffers with a single entity (the Association), greater consistency of design and maintenance may be achieved. At a minimum, the landscape buffers shall be placed within a permanent landscape easement designated as such on the plat. No easements are currently shown. 9. Six -foot -high, permanent perimeter fencing shall be required along the eastern boundary of Lot 1, Block 3, and Lot 2, Block 1, and along the southern boundary of Lot 15 & 16, Block 1. Submit detailed fencing plans for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat. All required fencing is to be in place prior to issuance of building permits. 10. The Applicant is proposing to construct a fence along the east boundary of the Hunter Lateral. Staff recommends the Lateral be piped and no fence constructed. Given the close proximity of the proposed 200 unit apartment complex, High School, and Daycare, staff recommends the applicant be required to comply with Ord.12-4-13 (Piping of AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 7 Ditches). The City required the developers of Raven Hill and Los Alamitos subdivisions (upstream from subject site) to tile the Hunter and see no reason this site should receive an exemption from the piping ordinance. 11. Applicant shall provide a vehicular access across the Hunter Lateral from the proposed apartment complex (Site `B") to the proposed Office/Retail area (Site "A"). The purpose of this connection is to minimize the vehicular impact on Overland Road and to provide an internal connection to the Daycare and Retail sites. The Transportation Impact Study submitted by Dobie Engineering, Inc. assumed 20% of the office and day care traffic would be captured within the complex. However, this capturing cannot take place unless an internal access road is provided. If a connection is not provided across the Hunter, an additional 20% of vehicle trips would be added to Overland Road (based on Dobie's estimations). 12. Applicant has provided the minimum required 35 feet of landscape buffer along Overland Road, an entryway corridor. Staff agrees. They show 25 feet of landscape buffer along Locust Grove Road (including the 5 foot wide detached sidewalk). Since Locust Grove is not listed as an entryway corridor, Staff supports the 25 -foot buffer width for this arterial. At a minimum, the Overland Road landscape buffer must be completed from the eastern property boundary to 30 feet west of Millenium Way prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy for any building within the subdivision. 13. Applicant is proposing a 30 -foot wide private road (Y2K Lane) to serve Lot 6 and 8, Block 1. Applicant should explain the purpose for the private classification and whether or not sidewalks will be provided. All private roads must approved by the City Council. Staff questions the intent of the private classification, particularly when this will be the first drive providing access into the site for eastbound traffic on Overland and will likely be heavily used. If approved, Staff recommends 5 -foot sidewalks be provided on at least one (1) side of the road. Preliminary Plat Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions: a) additional fencing is provided, b) the Hunter Lateral is tiled, c) provide a single vehicular connection across the Hunter Lateral, and d) landscaping is provided and constructed per item #12. Until the City receives a copy of the ACHD report, the public hearing should be continued. CUP (PUD/COMMERCIAL) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-017) 1. As part of a conditional use permit, the City of Meridian may impose restrictions and conditions in addition to current City Ordinances. 2. This Conditional Use Permit is for the overall concept only. Future phases of the project will require separate Conditional Use Permits for each phase and each must substantially comply with the final approved Concept Plan. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 8 3. Conceptually (based upon the submitted Overall Preliminary Site Plan dated 2-01-00), staff believes the project is in accord with the purpose of Planned Developments as outlined in the Subdivision & Development Ordinance. The mixed residential, office, recreation and retail uses meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and should contribute to a reduction in traffic in this area. 4. Planned Development Regulations: As a mixed/planned use development, the Resolution Plaza development must comply with the following sections of the subdivision ordinance: 12-6-4 Procedures for Planned Developments, 12-6-6 General Regulations for Planned Development, and 12-6-7 General Standards for Planned Developments. In addition, residential areas must comply with 12-6-8-A Design Standards for Planned Development -Residential. All commercial and office uses must comply with 12-6-8-B Design Standards for Planned Development -Commercial. 5. Colored Rendering: Colored renderings of the development must be submitted prior to the City Council meeting to meet the intent of Section 12-6-4 of the PD ordinance. 6. Open Space: All Planned Developments (PD) are required to have at least 10% of the gross land area of the PD as common open space as 12-6-7-E-5. The total common open space calculation for Resolution Plaza is shown separately on Sheets 1-3 (Sites "A" — "C"). Site "A" is 4.53 acres (1.44 required), Site `B" is 5.29 acres (1.45 required), and Site "C" is 4.10 acres (1.86 required). These calculations include landscape buffers and islands. Standard practice has been that residential PD's cannot count required buffers and landscape setbacks toward the 10% open space requirement, but commercial PD's have been allowed to count it. Total gross site acreage for the Resolution Plaza project is 47.04 acres (excluding public rights-of-way). 10% open space would be 4.7 acres. The minimum amount of open space has been met. All open space delineated as common open space must meet all standards of 12-6-7-E. 7. Parking: The matrix below summarizes the total off-street parking counts for the conceptual PD -C: Site / Use Parking Proposed Parking Required Site "A" - Retail pads N of first driveway (3) 257 250 - Retail & office pads b/w driveways (2) 183 181 - Office & day care pads S of second driveway 189 100 (est.) Site "A" Total 629 531 Site `B" (Apartment complex) 553* 460 (2.3/d.u.) Site "C" - Retail & office pads on Y2K Lane (2) 156 151 AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 9 - LDS Seminary 17 20 (est.) - Office buildings S of Gala St. (2) 129 98 - Retail & office buildings N of Gala St. (2) 317 287 -Ice Arena 278 1 286 115 seats) *The Applicant is proposing 152 tandem parking spaces for the complex. The P&Z Commission discouraged tandem parking for a proposed apartment complex of similar size in October 1999 (Valerie Heights). If the tandem parking is subtracted from the total parking spaces, their total provided would be 401 spaces. On the Site "A" plan, a row of parking is proposed along the south edge of the north driveway and along both the north and south edges of the south driveway with no separation. Given the likelihood of these private driveways receiving high volumes of traffic at build -out (functioning more as public roads), Staff feels this design would be unsafe and should be relocated. The first parking stalls are less than 40 feet from the property line and vehicles backing out of the stalls into the drive aisle will likely be a hazard for vehicles entering the site off Locust Grove. The proposed Ice Arena seats a total of 1,430 people. Technically, the Applicant meets City ordinance, which is based on one stall for every 5 seats. If one assumes the arena will utilize the parking north of Gala Street for evening events, an additional 317 stalls could feasibly be added to serve the arena, providing a total of 595 stalls. The Applicant should provide more detail on the hours of operation for the ice arena and their experience with other similar venues and whether or not both rinks will be used simultaneously. 8. Parking Lot Landscaping: Landscape islands serving a single row of parking shall have one tree. Islands serving a double row of parking shall have two trees. A minimum of one 3" caliper tree per 1500 square feet of asphalt (including driveways connecting from the loop road) is required per City Ordinance. 9. Streets and Circulation: Staff agrees with the proposed stub road (Gala Street) to the east, unplatted property. As stated in the Preliminary Plat comments, we recommend access be provided internally with a connection between Sites "A" and `B". There is a conflict between the Concept Plan and Plat for the Seminary site. The plat proposes a flag lot for Lot 4, Block 1 (the proposed 19,648 s.f. office building), with the flag serving as the driveway. However, the Concept Plan shows the seminary utilizing the flag driveway, not the office. Staff does not disagree with the design, but it should be noted for future cross access agreements. 10. Signage: The Applicant submitted a letter from Idaho Electric Signs regarding signage for the apartment complex and a letter from Patrick McKeegan outlining intent for the ice arena signage. The monument signs shall not exceed 70 s.f. All signage throughout the PD -C shall be coordinated and complement building materials and themes. This applies to all future buildings. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plua.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc r, Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 10 11. Storage Areas: Per Ordinance 12-6-8.A.1, Storage areas shall be provided for the anticipated needs of boats, campers, motorhomes, and trailers. No such areas are designated on the Site Plan. Applicant shall either provide a storage area adequate to serve every two (2) living units or provide evidence that storage needs can be met through an alternative method. 12. Maintenance Building: A maintenance building or approved area shall be provided that is suitable for the services required for the repair and maintenance of all common areas as per Section 9-607.H.3. 13. Trash Enclosures: No trash enclosures are shown on the Conceptual Site Plan. Staff recommends all such areas be situated outside of view from either Overland or Locust Grove Roads. Applicant shall coordinate locations and construction requirements of the required trash enclosures with Meridian Sanitary Service, Inc., and provide a letter of approval from their office when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. 14. Hours of Operation: No details of hours of operation are provided. For the future CUP applications, all office and retail uses should be harmonious with the apartment complex and residential homes to the west. 15. Alternative Transportation Options: At build -out, this site will serve as a principal center of employment for the east Meridian/west Boise area. While Boise Urban Stages does not currently service Overland Road, it has the potential to be a likely destination point for mass transit in the future. Staff strongly recommends an area be designated and/or preserved on the Concept Plan for a future bus stop. We also recommend the inclusion of bicycle racks at all office and retail buildings and the ice hockey arena. 16. All conditions placed on this application shall run with the land and shall not lapse or be waived as the result of any change in tenancy or ownership of any or all of the lands governed by this CUP application. All such conditions shall be deemed the requirements for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any use or structure as per City Ordinance. 17. Applicant shall utilize the Ada County Highway District design standards for the private street within this development, with the exception of width requirements. Street designs shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Meridian Public Works Department. PD -C Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the concept plan with the above conditions. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 11 CUP (APARTMENT COMPLEX) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-017) 1. All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site `B" (apartment complex) shall be incorporated here. 2. The Applicant is proposing to construct the complex in two (2) phases, with the first phase consisting of approximately 140 units and the clubhouse. Staff recommends the number of units constructed in phase 1 be limited to a maximum of thirty (30) dwelling units and that no more units be granted occupancy until Overland Road capacity is improved. Overland Road between Locust Grove and Eagle Road is currently a two-lane, non - signalized arterial. Numerous traffic concerns have been entered into the public record regarding the capacity of both Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. Traffic was cited as one of the principal reasons for the City's denial of the proposed Sundance Apartments at the NW corner of Locust Grove Road and Overland Road last Fall. Dobie Engineering's traffic study lists Overland Road (east of Locust Grove Road) as having 11,230 vehicles/day in 7/98. Over the past twenty (20) months, this figure has certainly increased; especially factoring in the new homes built in Sherbrooke Hollows to the south. Dobie's study estimates 1,170 new trips/day to be generated by the apartment complex and 335 new trips/day generated by the ice arena. The study also projects a Level of Service "F" for the left -turn outs from all three Overland Road driveways until signals are installed. The study further assumes the high school, potentially slated for construction in 2001 (which is the same year as the apartment complex), will generate 3,000 trips/day and 250 peak hour trips. Overland Road is designated in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as a 5 -lane arterial with bike lanes to be constructed in 2005. Staff believes that limiting new development on the subject site, to the Ice Arena and thirty (30) apartments would facilitate a smoother transition for the neighborhoods and ease the impact on Overland Road until such time as it is widened and signalized. All applicable Fair Housing and ADA requirements for multi -family housing must be met, including accessibility design for the ground floor units. Handicap parking shall be provided to serve the Clubhouse. CUP (Apartments) Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the condition that only the clubhouse and thirty (30) dwelling units receive occupancy until Overland Road is improved. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. CUP ("THE POND" ICE ARENA) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-015) 1. All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site "C" (ice arena) shall be incorporated here. 2. A minimum of seven (7) handicap accessible spaces must be provided to directly serve this AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 12 facility. Only two (2) are shown. Revise site plan accordingly. CUP (Ice Arena) Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS The 1993 Comprehensive Plan contains a variety of goals and policies relevant to this application. The following sections most directly apply to the proposed project and are repeated here for the Council and Commission's consideration during the hearing process. Goal 3 is "to encourage the kind of economic growth and development which supplies employment and economic self-sufficiency for existing and future residents, reduces the present reliance on Boise and strengthens the City's ability to finance and implement public improvements, services, and its open space character." Goal 4 is "to provide housing opportunities for all economic groups within the community." Goal 8 is "to establish compatible and efficient use of land through the use of innovative and functional site design." Economic Development 1.1 The City of Meridian shall make every effort to create a positive atmosphere that encourages... commercial enterprises to locate in Meridian. 1.3 The character, site improvements and type of new commercial or industrial developments should be harmonized with the natural environment and respect the unique needs and features of each area. Land Use I AU Encourage new development that reinforces the City's present development pattern of higher density development within the Old Town area and lower density development in outlying areas. 1.8U Promote the development of high-quality and environmentally compatible residential areas that contain the necessary parks, schools and commercial facilities to maintain and form identifiable neighborhoods. 2.1 U Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi -family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities. 2.2U Support strategies for the development of neighborhood parks within all residential areas. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Pla a.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doe Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 13 2.3U Protect and maintain residential neighborhood property values, improve each neighborhood's physical condition and enhance its quality of life for residents. 4.8U Encourage commercial uses, offices and medical -care uses to locate in the Old Town district, business parks, shopping centers and near high-intensity activity areas, such as freeway interchanges. 6.8U New urban density subdivisions which abut or are proximal to existing rural residential land uses shall provide screening and transitional densities with larger, more comparable lot sizes to buffer the interface between the urban level densities and rural residential densities. Transportation 1.4U Monitor and coordinate the compatibility of the'land use and transportation system. 1.20U Encourage proper design of residential neighborhoods to ensure their safety and tranquility. Open Space, Parks and Recreation 2.5U New subdivision development... will be considered as opportunities to ... encourage the development of recreational open spaces and parks as part of new planned developments. Housing 1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide diversity of housing types... in a variety of locations suitable for residential development. 1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping centers shall be encouraged. 1.6 Housing proposals shall be phased with transportation, open space and public service and facility plans, which will maximize benefits to the residents, minimize conflicts and provide a tie-in between new residential areas and service needs. 1.19 High-density development, where possible, should be located near open space corridors or other permanent major open space and park facilities, and near major access thoroughfares. Community Design 5.2 Ensure that all new development enhances rather than detracts from the visual quality of its surroundings, especially in areas of prominent visibility. 6.5U Establish land -use designations that reflect the character of existing neighborhoods. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 14 6.11 U Promote well-planned and well -designated affordable housing in all Meridian neighborhoods. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc MHH-22-2000 12:18 BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. BR/GGS E/1�HNE�ER/NG / / PLANNM / SURVEYORS March 22, 2000 Mr. Brad Hawkins -Clark Mr. Bruce Freckleton City of Meridian 200 L. Carlton, Suite 201 Meridian, Idaho 83642 12083452950 P.02 Boise, Idaho 83705 — 3142 Voice (208) 3449700 Fax (208) 345-2950 E-mail briggs@micron.nei =�a MAR 2 2 2000 CITY OF !4EJq1DLAN Re: Resolution Plaza. (Annexation, Rezone, Preliminary Plat, PUD & Conditional Use Applications) Dear Brad and Bruce: This letter is in response to staff comments dated March 20, 2000 General Comments : 1. We are in agreement. 2. The phasing information is correct. 3. The School District information is correct. 4. We would like more detailed information on transportation management plans. General Requirements l . Internal irrigation and drainage ditches will be piped. The Hunter Lateral adjoining the west boundary of the Voigt property will be piped. The section of the adjoining Hunter Lateral which abuts the Meridian School District property will be the responsibility of the District it piping is required for Lot 1, Block 1. 2. A septic system and two wells presently exist on the property. The septic system and residential well will be removed per City Ordinance. The second well was used for agricultural purposes. We are exploring the possible use of the well as a secondary pressure irrigation source. 3. The applicant will comply. 4. The applicant wi I1 comply. 5. The applicant will provide a drainage plan. A drainage ditch traverses the subject property. The ditch receives nun -off from the property. We may explore approval to discharge; the pre - development now, 6. The applicant will comply. 7. The applicant will comply. 8. The applicant will comply. 9. The applicant will comply. 0 10 1 \CityMcr Hawkins -Clark Response.ltr MAR 22 '00 12:24 12083452950 PAGE.02 MAR -22-2000 12:18 BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. ----- 12083452950 P.e3 Annexation and Zoning Requirements (File AZ -00-004) 1. Acceptable. 2. Staff's recommendation for Neighborhood Commercial (CN) zoning is acceptable since the anticipated uses would be allowed within the CN designation. 3. We are in agreement. 4. The applicant will comply and enter into a development agreement. Rezone Reguirements :(File R2-00-003) 1. We are in agreement. 2. We are in agreement. 3. We are in agreement. 4. The applicant will comply and enter into a development agreement. Preliminary Plat General Comments: (File PP -00-006) 1. The subdivision name Resolution Subdivision has been approved by the Ada County Engineer. The Street Name Committee has reviewed the proposed street name and has issued an evaluation and approval. 2. The applicant will comply. 3. The applicant will comply. Preliminary Plat Requirements (File PP -00-006) 1. The applicant will comply. 2. The applicant will comply. 3. The applicant will comply. 4. The applicant will provide pressure irrigation to all lots with the exception of Lot 1, Block 1 (Meridian School District lot). We have contacted the School District concerning participation in a joint pump station. However, if the District believes financial participation is premature, since their irrigation needs are unknown at this time. We will proceed with an independent station. 5. The applicant intends to design and construct the pressure irrigation facilities to Nampa Meridian Irrigation District Standards. The system will be owned and maintained by Nampa Meridian Irrigation District with approval by the District Board. An agricultural well exists on the G. L. Voigt parcel. The well was historically used for a dairy. We intend to utilise the well as a secondary source if -approval from Idaho Department of Water Resources can be obtained. 6. 'The applicant will delineate the NMID casement for the Hunter Lateral on the plat. No other irrigation easements exist on the subject properties. 7. The applicant will comply. 8. The applicant intends to provide landscape easements along Locust Grove and Overland Roads. An association will be formed to govern perimeter landscaping. 9. The applicant will comply. 0101\CityMer Hawkins -Clark Response.lt- MAR 22 '00 12:25 12083452950 PAGE.03 MAR -22-2000 12:18 BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. 12083452950 P.04 I-,— 10. The developer of the apartment complex believes a fence along their western boundary is necessary as a buffer and for security purposes. Interconnection can be accomplished with pedestrian pathways and (1) vehicular connection as requested in Condition No. 11. The applicant will pipe the Hunter Lateral as requested by staff. 11. A vehicular connection between Site A & B could be accomplished from the driveway between building 7 & 8. if the daycare building size were reduced and the driveway angles north to intersect just above the traffic circle. 12. The applicant will comply. 13. The private road functions as a joint private access between Lot 8 & 6, Block t and Millennium Way. This access could be accomplished with an easement or cross access agreement for a driveway. The applicant did not intend the driveway to be constructed with curbs, gutter and sidewalk. CUP (PUD/Commercial) Requirements: (File CUP -00-017) I. The applicant understands. 2. The applicant understands the approval is conceptual and future uses will require site specific conditional use approval. The staff and commission must understand the term conceptual. final development plans will most likely reflect minor deviations from the concept. 3. The applicant is in agreement. 4. The applicant will comply with the requirements of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance as follows: Sections 12-6-4, 12-6-6, 12-6-7 & 12-6-8-B. The applicant disagrees with the requirements of Section 12-6-8-A (1, 2 & 3). (1) The multi -family project applicant indicates the parking of any type of recreational vehicle will be prohibited. Any resident with RV's will need to store the vehicles at a public storage facility offsite. Therefore, there is no necessity to provide a storage area. (2) The applicant opposes the recommendation to provide one additional parking space for every three dwelling units in addition to the required 2 spaces per dweling unit. This section is not a mandate since it refers to the word "may" not shall or should. The applicant for the apartment complex has provided two (2) parking spaces per dwelling unit as specified in Section 11-13-15-B of the Meridian Ordinance. The standard of two spaces per unit is universal in most jurisdictions. The applicant has also provided attached garages which enhances the aesthetics of the project with less hard surface areas. Driveways (tandem parking) to the garages provides additional parking for guests. (3) No maintenance building is proposed with the multi -family or commercial project. The applicants intend to contract with a landscape company for maintenance of common areas and landscaping. Therefore, this requirement should 0101\CityMer Hawkins -Clark Response.ltr MAR 22 '00 12:25 12083452950 PAGE.04 MAR -22-2000 12:19 BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. YII\lM 12083452950 P.05 be deleted. 5. A colored site/landscape plan and multiple colored elevations of proposed structures was submitted with the applications. The applicants will need specifics concerning additional information required under Section 12-6-4. It is the applicant's belief that Section 12-6-4 has been satisfied. 6. The applicant is in agreement. 7. The applicant disagrees with the parking requirement of Site B (Apartment Complex). Staff indicates a requirement of 2.3 spaces/dwelling unit. The Ordinance mandates (2) spaces/du. Staff has never required parking in excess of 2/unit on any previous applications processed by Briggs Engineering. I believe this recommendation is excessive and adds to paved areas at the expense of landscaping/common areas. The Ordinance does not mandate anything beyond (2) spaces/unit. The parking required condition should he revised to reflect 1,1400". The Apartment Complex was designed with 401 parking spaces (garages and open parking) to meet the Ordinance requirement of 2 spaces/unit. The tandem parking (driveways in front of attached garages) was considered excess, yet was referenced on the site plan. Mr. McKeegan, the architect for the lee Arena believes the parking provided (278 spaces) will be under utilized most of the time. (Sec Mr. McKeegan's letter attached.) Customers of the rink will have the ability to park in adjoining lots during heavy peak hours for the rink. We believe a minor amount of over—flow parking is reasonable. Please refer to the letter from Patrick McKeegan dated March 21, 2000 for additional information on the Ice Arena's parking needs and hours of operation. The applicant will revise the site plan and remove the three rows of parking stalls which back directly into the access driveways on Site A. S. The applicant will comply with landscaping requirements for parking lots. 9. The applicant is in agreement and will delineate the necessary cross access easements on the final plat for lots which may share private access driveways. 10. The applicant will comply. 11. The applicant for the Apartment Complex will prohibit the parking of recreational vehicles within the complex. 12. The maintenance of common areas will be contracted with a lawn care company. Therefore, there is no practical need for a maintenance building for any of the proposed developments. 13. A site plan was sent to Meridian Sanitary Services for their review and comment. A meeting has been scheduled with Bill Gregory, Meridian Sanitary Services on March 22, 2000 to obtain recommendations for trash enclosure locations. The applicant will comply. 14. See letter from Patrick McKeegan concerning hours of operation for the Ice Arena. We agree that hours of operation are important in order to coexist with existing residential development and the proposed multi -family development. 15. An easement For a possible future bus stop could be provided on the plat. 0101\CityMer llawkins-Clark Response. Itr MAR 22 100 12:26 12083452950 PAGE.05 MAR -22-2000 12:20 BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. 12083452950 P.06 HR/GGS E/MG/NF..EKSAM; //fC 1800 W Overland Road *e —Idaho 83/05 (GU8) 344 yIUU The inclusion of bicycle racks within the development is acceptable. 16. The applicant is in agreement. 17. The applicant proposes the Y2K Lane as a private driveway. The applicant does not intend to construct this as a public street with curb, gutter and sidewalk. CUP (Apartment Complex) Requirements: (File CUP -00-017) I. The applicant agrees, with the exception of those conditions which we have documented our opposition. 2. The applicant disagrees with the limitation of the apartment complex to 30 units. it is not economically feasible to construct the necessary infrastructure (i.e. clubhouse, pool, sewer, water, roadways & parking) to accommodate 30 units. (See letter from Desert West, LLC.) It is our desire to encourage ACT TD to consider a private/public effort to improve Overland Road. 3. The applicant will comply with ADA requirements. CUP ("The Pond" Ice Arena) Requirements• (bile CUP -00-015) 1. The applicant agrees with the exception of those conditions which we have documented opposition. 2. The applicant will comply. (See Patrick McKeegan's letter dated March 21, 2000.) Sincerely, BRIG S ENGINES G, T Becky L. Bowcutt T.dnd Use Planner BLB:fc 0101\CiryMer Hawkins -Clark Response.ltr MAR 22 '00 12:26 120R�dS�4�n oor_r �� MAR -22-2000 12:20 BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. 1. 16^ -_ Patrick W Keegao Architects 419 S. 8R► Street, Suite B Boise, Idaho 83702-7157 208.424.8608 Fax 208.424.8609 www.mckeeganarCh.com March 21, 2000 Becky Bowcutt Briggs Engineering 1800 W. Overland road Boise, ID 83705 Re: Pond Ice Arena CUP Report Response Project No. 99052 Dear Becky, 12083452950 P.07 I have reviewed Meridian's comments and am pleased with the positive response. My response to their comments on the Ice Facility follows. For clarity I have indicated the City's page and paragraph number. Page 3, Item 4: Transportation Management Plan. We support the concept and would participate in a development wide plan. Page 3, Item 5: Drainage. Will there be a development wide drainage plan or will we be required to maintain all drainage on our parcel? Our civil engineer has indicated that we can accommodate our drainage runoff on our parcel. Page 4, Item 2: C -N zoning. 1 assume that since staff has not stated the Ice Rink use is not allowed in the C -N zoning that it is. We have no problem with the designation for our use. Page 5, Item 4 and Page 6 Item 5: Pressurized irrigation system. Will this be a development wide system or will each parcel be responsible for its needs? Page 5, Item 9: Perimeter fencing. Will the fencing be installed by the development or are we responsible for the portion abutting our proposed lot? Page 7 Item 2. Conceptual approval only. It was Mr. Smith's understanding that our application was for CU approval of our project also. When is the earliest we could apply for our CU? Page 8, Item 5. Colored rendering. I thought we fumished one with our previous package to You. I have enclosed another for this submission. MAF' -71 15:45 208 424 6609 MAR 22 '00 12:27 12083452950 PAGE.07 MRR-22-2000 12:20 BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. 12083452950 P.08 Page 9, Item 7; Additional detail on operations. Mr. Smith has conducted focus groups to determine the feasibility for this facility and what the communities needs are for ice related recreation. He is also actively involved in the local recreational hockey leagues. Much of the information is proprietary business information but t can summarized our plans as follows-, There is a need in the area for additional ice facilities, Ice World is currently running at full capacity and cannot support the current need or anticipated growth in hockey. Many of the adult participants work non-traditional hours because of the nature of the major employers (Micron, HP, etc.) running multiple shifts. There is a need for a facility that will provide around the clock Ice facilities. Our facility will be open 24 hours but except for a few peak periods during the day will not require anywhere near the parking that is being requested. For example if both sheets were being used by four teams there would be approximately 64 persons on the ice. During open recreational skating there might be as many as 100 persons on one or both sheets. Open recreational skating will be scheduled after school and during the early evenings when the sheets are not scheduled for practice. The majority of the time the ice will be scheduled by teams (16 players plus coaches) for practice on a rotating basis. We anticipate once a month having tournaments or other events that would require the full parking count. These would usually occur during the weekend or evenings when the office parking would not be used. We believe the parking we have provided will be underutilized most of the time and that the shared use for the additional 8 seats is reasonable. We had hoped the City would allow more shared parking so the total development parking lots would not need to be so large. Page 10, Item 15: Bicycle racks. They will be provided at our facility. Page 11, Item 2: HC parking spaces. 5 additional HC parking spaces will be designated. If you have any questions, or need more information, please call. Sincerely. Patrick McKeegan Architects /Patrick Mc gan Principal Architect MAR -21-2000 15=46 208 424 2609 MAR 22 '00 12:27 12083452950 PAGE.08 P.A2 MAR -22-2000 12:21 BRIGGS ENGINEERING INC. 12083452950 P.09 Desert West Properties, LLC Planning & Zoning Commission / Mayor & City Council City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 3/21/00 Rc: Comnicnts on the submittal review comments for the 200 unit Luxury Apartment Complex by Desert West Properties, LLC Dear, Commission and council With regard to conditions proposed m the March 20'h 2000 review of our application for a Conditional Use Permit (File CUP -00-015) We would Like to address the items that perrtain to the 200 Unit Luxury Apartment complex. Preliminary Plat Requirements (File PP -00-006) Item 10: It is the preference of the applicant to pipe the hunter lateral as well as construct the 6' fence. It is our opinion that the perimeter fence is necessary to maintain the level of security and cleanliness that our clientele will expect from a facility of this caliber. We ask the City council to allow tis to provide this important amenity. Thant: you. [tem 11: The applicant would be agreeable to this condition provided that we are able to limit the traffic into the complex to residents only, thereby protecting the project from drive threw traffic that would be detrimental to the peace and tranquility of our secured environment. CUP (PUD/Commercial) Requirements (File CUP -00-017) Item 7: The applicant believes that there has been an error in the calculation of the required parking. When the tandem parking spaces are deducted from the total of the proposed parking, 401 spaces remain. It is our understanding that there are 2 stalls required for each of the 200 units equaling 400 stalls. Item 8: It is our intent to comply with this request fully. Item 11: It is the intent of the applicant to restrict parking to automobiles and light duty trucks able to Ft into one stall. Storage of boats, campers, motorhomes, trailers and vehicles that are inoperable or not used regularly will not be allowed and the owner will be required to secure suitable storage elsewhere. MOP -22-2000 ee:'S 20829695.2" MAR 22 '00 12:28 12083452950 PAGE.09 P . 02 MRR-22-2000 12:21 BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. 12083452950 P.10 Item 12: The applicant will be subcontracting maintenance and grounds keeping to a qualified professional. Item 13: the applicant intends to conform to this request in full. CUP (Apartment Complex) requirements (File CUP -00-017) Item 2: The applicant has concluded that it is not economically feasible to limit the number of units that can be built in phase 1, and requests that the council delete such a requirement, as it would interfere with the ability of the business to be profitable. We arc aware of the traffic problem on Overland road, however, it is our belief that by developing this site fully and paying the ACRD impact fees we will be closer to funding the expansion than if development is drawn out and funding is not as available. In addition, the 1,170 trips per day estimated by Dobie Engineering is somewhat insignificant when compared to the traffic generated by the High school and other commercial enterprises. We appreciate responsibility that you bear and thank you for the service you render in behalf of this community. Sincerely, The Principles of Desert West Property LLC MAR -22-2030 08:135 Descrt Wcar Properdcs. LLC, F0 Dox 1030 Mendiao. Idaho 93642 (208) 896-0800 F.A. (M) 898.9527 _a'-:�8985+52" r. TOTAL P.10 MAR 22 '00 12;28 12083452950 PAGE.10 MRR-22-2000 12:17 BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. 12083452950 P.01 E►1GINEERING BRIGGS I ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL COMPANY - I FAX NO. .• DATE 3 - z - cb NO. OF PAGES SENT 0 (Including Transmittal) FROM coD - Lo) BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD BOISE, IDAHO 83705 FAX (208) 345-2950 * TEL (208) 344-9700 (BEI) PROJECT NO. d/ o REFERENCE i 6-1� .'Z - REMARKS REPLY REQUESTED COPY 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD * BOISE, IDAHO 83705 * (208)344-9700 FAX (208)345-29` MAR 22 '00 12:24 12083452950 PRGE.01 INTERSTATE 84 ` I N MERIDIAN CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY i C -G 500 0 500 L.1000 Feet C -G I I lu 4 1 LBLOCK3 BLOCK4 9 GH STREET ,i BLOCK 2 lJJ 3 2 5 4 BLOCK 1 SITE �'4"Z I ► R-4 I i � R1 I 7 RT I R-4 I _ !` RT -- s� BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION REVISION BRIGGS PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20, T -3N., R. 1E., B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO (208) 344-8700 SHEET 7800 W. OVERLAND ROAD 1 OF 1 BOISE, DESIGN IDAHO 83705 DRAFT SCALE DATE BKB 1"= 500' 02/01/00 DWG. 01071 10107 APR RT r 12 11 13 K 1 10 14 15 18 lu 4 1 LBLOCK3 BLOCK4 9 GH STREET ,i BLOCK 2 lJJ 3 2 5 4 BLOCK 1 SITE �'4"Z I ► R-4 I i � R1 I 7 RT I R-4 I _ !` RT -- s� BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION REVISION BRIGGS PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20, T -3N., R. 1E., B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO (208) 344-8700 SHEET 7800 W. OVERLAND ROAD 1 OF 1 BOISE, DESIGN IDAHO 83705 DRAFT SCALE DATE BKB 1"= 500' 02/01/00 DWG. 01071 10107 APR RT r MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, MARCH 22 AT 6:30 P.M. ROLL CALL: SALLY NORTON THOMAS BARBEIRO RICHARD HATCHER KENT BROWN CHAIRMAN KEITH BORUP PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 16.119 ACRES FROM RT TO CG FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC -OVERLAND AND LOCUST GROVE ROADS.- 2. OADS: 2. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR REZONE OF 37.64 ACRES FROM R-4 TO LO FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC -OVERLAND AND LOCUST GROVE ROADS: 3. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF 107.06 ACRES LO AND CG ZONING FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC -OVERLAND AND LOCUST GROVE ROADS: 4. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPOSED PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF MULTI -FAMILY, COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND LDS SEMINARY, LO AND CG ZONING BY G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC -OVERLAND AND LOCUST GROVE ROADS: 5. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PROPOSED 200 UNIT LUXURY APARTMENT COMPLEX TO BE ZONED LO FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY DESERT WEST PROPERTIES, LLC -OVERLAND AND LOCUST GROVE ROADS: 6. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN ICE ARENA CONSISTING OF OFFICE, PRO SHOP, FITNESS CENTER, RESTAURANT, LOCKER ROOMS, EQUIPMENT STORAGE AND ARENAS ZONED LO BY PAT MCKEEGAN (LEE SMITH ICE ARENA) -OVERLAND AND LOCUST GROVE ROADS: MAYOR Robert D. Come CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tammy deWeerd Cherie McCandless r HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY .�. A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208)887-2211• Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 MEMORANDUM: March 20, 2000 TYWCEIVED To: Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council jv_- From: Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Techniciar�� MAR 2 0 2000 Brad Hawkins -Clark, Planner3NC. City of Meridian Christy Richardson, PlanneCity Clerk Office r Re: - Request for a Annexation and Zoning of 16.1 Acres from R -T to C -G by Overland, L.L.C. (File AZ -00-004) - Rezone of 37.6 Acres from R-4 to L -O by G.L. Voigt (File RZ-00-003) - Preliminary Plat of 107.06 Acres by G.L. Voigt (File PP -00-006) - Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Commercial Development (RESOLUTION PLAZA) consisting of Multi -Family, Commercial, Office and LDS Seminary in the proposed L -O and C -G Zones (File CUP -00-017) - Conditional Use Permit for a 200 Unit Luxury Apartment Complex by Desert West Properties, L.L.C. (File CUP -00-015) - Conditional Use Permit for a 86,160 Square Foot Ice Arena by Pat McKeegan (File CUP -00-016) We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATIONS SUMMARY There are six (6) separate applications covered in this report, each addressed separately after the summary. Five of the applications are associated with two parcels and propose a Planned Commercial Development (PD -C), generally located at the SE corner of Overland and South Locust Grove Roads. The sixth application (preliminary plat) also includes a 55 -acre parcel to the south of the PD -C owned by the Meridian School District and site of a future high school. The PD -C proposed uses include retail, office, an LDS Seminary, a 1,430 -seat ice hockey arena (two rinks), a daycare and a 200 -unit luxury apartment complex. The annexation application applies only to the 16 -acre parcel west of the Hunter Lateral. The rezone application applies only to the 37.64 -acre parcel south of Overland and east of the Hunter. Since ACHD has not yet submitted a report on the Preliminary Plat or three (3) CUP applications, Staff is recommending these four (4) applications be continued or tabled. Resolution Pla a.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Mayor, Council and P&'— March 20, 2000 Page 2 LOCATION The property is generally located at the SE corner of Overland Road and South Locust Grove Road with approximately '/2 mile of frontage along Overland. The future high school parcel is currently land -locked and directly south of the 36 -acre parcel. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North – R.V. park, Cesco (John Deere), Transport, Truck & Trailers, future location of Treasure Valley Music, and two vacant parcels. All are zoned C -G (Meridian). South – An LDS church is currently being constructed on the Ada County parcel immediately south of the Overland, LLC parcel fronting on Locust Grove. Rim View Subdivision, zoned R1 in Ada County, is south of the church. Raven Hill and Los Alamitos Subdivision, zoned R4 (Meridian), lie south of the school parcel. East – Several large, vacant parcels currently in agricultural use are east of the subject parcels. All are zoned RT (Ada County). West – Several phases of Sportsman Pointe Subdivision, zoned R4, lies across Locust Grove Road to the west. There is also an unplatted, triangular shaped parcel at the SW corner of the intersection that is not in City limits, zoned RT (Ada Co.), with a single family residence. CURRENT OWNERS OF RECORD Gary L. Voigt is the property owner of the 37.6 acre parcel. Craig Groves and Greg Johnson (Overland LLC) are the owners of the 16.1 acre parcel. Meridian Joint School District No. 2 is the owner of the 55 acre parcel. All owners have submitted consent to be a part of these applications. GENERAL COMMENTS/OVERVIEW (All Applications) 1. The 1993 Meridian Comprehensive Plan was amended by Resolution #266 (File CPA -99- 005) for the Voigt and Overland LLC parcels from Single Family Residential to Mixed/Planned Use Development on 11-16-99 by action of the City Council. Under the amended Mixed Use designation, the proposed uses are permitted. 2. The applicant has proposed a tentative phasing plan consisting of four levels of priority: Phase I - Ice Hockey Facility (Construction anticipated in year 2000) Phase II - Apartment Complex Site `B" (Construction anticipated in year 200 1) Phase III - Office/Retail Site "C" (Schedule dependent on tenant sales) Phase IV - Commercial/Office Site "A" (Applicant anticipates that this corner will not develop until the Locust Grove overpass is constructed.) NOTE: The Final Plat must be recorded prior to issuance of any building permits or Certificates of Zoning Compliance. 3. The Meridian School District will be a party to the preliminary plat at the City's request. The Meridian School District does not support nor oppose the Resolution Plaza project. It should be noted that the School District plans a High School on their 54.99 acre site. Development of the school site is contingent on a bond issue. The school district has indicated that a bond AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution P1m.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&,-,'-^' March 20, 2000 Page 3 issue for the high school will be submitted for a vote in the fall of 2000. If approved, construction of the school will take place in 2001. 4. On July 19, 1999, the APA (COMPASS) Board of Directors moved the proposed Locust Grove/I-84 overpass from the Destination 2020 Plan (soft projection) to the Transportation Improvement Plan (hard planning document). APA projects a dramatic increase in traffic for South Locust Grove when the overpass is constructed and they support a transportation management plan be developed for this project to coordinate the commuter needs of future residents and employees. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (All Applications) 1 • Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for non- domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements. 4. Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 5. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 6. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section. 7. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 8. Provide five -foot -wide sidewalks in accordance.with City Ordinance. 9. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ,RZ.PP,CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&.`�' March 20, 2000 Page 4 ANNEXATION & ZONING REQUIREMENTS (File AZ -00-004) The legal description submitted in the application appears to meet the requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission. The parcel is contiguous to the existing corporate city limits of Meridian. 2. Staff agrees with the Applicant's forecast that the Overland/Locust Grove area will become a major intersection, especially with the construction of the I-84/Locust Grove overpass. Staff also agrees that neighborhood commercial services are needed in this area to service the existing residential subdivisions and proposed apartment complex residents. However, we do not support the proposed C -G zone. Staff recommends a lower -intensity commercial zone, Neighborhood Commercial (C -N). All of the proposed uses listed in item #10 of the application (retail, day care, and office) are permitted either outright or with a CUP in both the C -N and C -G. But there are several uses permitted in the C -G that are prohibited in the C -N, including auto repair, service stations, hotels, truck stops, heavy equipment sales and auto sales lots. Given the previously stated concerns of the Sportsman Pointe and Los Alamitos residents and the increased number of children in the apartment complex, Staff feel the down -zoned C -N is a more appropriate zone and will adequately meet the development intentions of the Applicant. 3. The subject lots can be adequately served by public facilities, and the proposed uses will allow for orderly expansion of the city limits. 4. A Development Agreement will be required as a condition of annexation Annexation Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the annexation but denial of the requested C -G zone. We recommend C -N zoning. REZONE REQUIREMENTS (File RZ-00-003) The legal description submitted in the application appears to meet the requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission. 2. Staff agrees with the proposed Limited Office (L -O) zone. It is the most appropriate zone for the proposed mixed uses within the Planned Development. The subject lot can be adequately served by public facilities, and the proposed uses will allow for orderly expansion of the city limits. 4. A Development Agreement will be required as a condition of rezone. Rezone Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the rezone with the requested L -O zone. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&'�' March 20, 2000 Page 5 PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL COMMENTS (File PP -00-006) Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 2. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 3. Assessment fees for water and sewer service are determined during the building plan review process. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Re -Assessment Agreement with the City of Meridian for all commercial uses. An assessment agreement is a vehicle that protects the City of Meridian and the Developer in the event that estimated assessments are not in line with actual usages. The agreement provides for reimbursement to the developer for over payment of assessments and payment to the City of Meridian of any shortfall in assessments. The overpayment/shortfall is determined after adequate historical usage. PRLIMINARY PLAT REQUIREMENTS (File PP -00-006) 1. Sanitary sewer service to this site will be via extensions from the Five Mile Trunk that is currently under construction by this applicant. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline. 2. Water service to this site will be via extensions from newly constructed mains under the interstate, and from extensions of existing mains installed in adjacent developments. Applicant will be responsible to construct the water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Please provide the Public works department with information on anticipated fire flow and domestic water requirements for the proposed site. Water service to this development is contingent upon positive results from a hydraulic analysis by our computer model. Flow and pressure from the existing mains should be monitored with the Meridian Water Department. 3. Two -hundred -fifty- and 100 -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 4. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on site. Please submit hook-up and design details based on the proposed landscaping. Due to the size of landscaped area, primary water supply connection to the City's mains will not be allowed. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ.PP. CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&."-*' March 20, 2000 Page 6 5. Applicant has not indicated whether the pressurized irrigation system within this development is to be owned and maintained by an association or the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. If the system is being proposed as a private system, plans and specifications for the irrigation system shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department as part of the development plan. review process. A draft copy of the pressurized irrigation system O&M manual must be submitted prior to plan approval. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area. 6. Show all existing easements for irrigation/drainage facilities located within the boundaries of this proposed development (i.e. Hunter Lateral easements). 7. Detailed landscape plans for the Overland Road and Locust Grove Road landscape frontage buffers and for street landscaping along Millenium Way and Celebration Avenue shall be submitted for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat application. This requirement does not include interior lot landscaping. Interior landscaping will be dealt with on a site by site review basis with future CUP applications. A letter of credit or cash surety will be required for the improvements prior to signature on the Final Plat. 8. Staff recommends the Overland and Locust Road landscape buffers be platted as separate common lots within the subdivision and maintenance be the responsibility of the Development Committee/Association. The draft CC&Rs submitted with the application states each separate lot owner in the subdivision will be responsible for construction, installation and maintenance of landscaping on each building site. By placing responsibility for the arterial landscape buffers with a single entity (the Association), greater consistency of design and maintenance may be achieved. At a minimum, the landscape buffers shall be placed within a permanent landscape easement designated as such on the plat. No easements are currently shown. 9. Six -foot -high, permanent perimeter fencing shall be required along the eastern boundary of Lot 1, Block 3, and Lot 2, Block 1, and along the southern boundary of Lot 15 & 16, Block 1. Submit detailed fencing plans for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat. All required fencing is to be in place prior to issuance of building permits. 10. The Applicant is proposing to construct a fence along the east boundary of the Hunter Lateral. Staff recommends the Lateral be piped and no fence constructed. Given the close proximity of the proposed 200 unit apartment complex, High School, and Daycare, staff recommends the applicant be required to comply with Ord. 12-4-13 (Piping of AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Pla AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z '—." March 20, 2000 Page 7 Ditches). The City required the developers of Raven Hill and Los Alamitos subdivisions (upstream from subject site) to tile the Hunter and see no reason this site should receive an exemption from the piping ordinance. 11. Applicant shall provide a vehicular access across the Hunter Lateral from the proposed apartment complex (Site `B") to the proposed Office/Retail area (Site "A"). The purpose of this connection is to minimize the vehicular impact on Overland Road and to provide an internal connection to the Daycare and Retail sites. The Transportation Impact Study submitted by Dobie Engineering, Inc. assumed 20% of the office and day care traffic would be captured within the complex. However, this capturing cannot take place unless an internal access road is provided. If a connection is not provided across the Hunter, an additional 20% of vehicle trips would be added to Overland Road (based on Dobie's estimations). 12. Applicant has provided the minimum required 35 feet of landscape buffer along Overland Road, an entryway corridor. Staff agrees. They show 25 feet of landscape buffer along Locust Grove Road (including the 5 foot wide detached sidewalk). Since Locust Grove is not listed as an entryway corridor, Staff supports the 25 -foot buffer width for this arterial. At a minimum, the Overland Road landscape buffer must be completed from the eastern property boundary to 30 feet west of Millenium Way prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy for any building within the subdivision. 13. Applicant is proposing a 30 -foot wide private road (Y2K Lane) to serve Lot 6 and 8, Block 1. Applicant should explain the purpose for the private classification and whether or not sidewalks will be provided. All private roads must approved by the City Council. Staff questions the intent of the private classification, particularly when this will be the first drive providing access into the site for eastbound traffic on Overland and will likely be heavily used. If approved, Staff recommends 5 -foot sidewalks be provided on at least one (1) side of the road. Preliminary Plat Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions: a) additional fencing is provided, b) the Hunter Lateral is tiled, c) provide a single vehicular connection across the Hunter Lateral, and d) landscaping is provided and constructed per item 912. Until the City receives a copy of the ACHD report, the public hearing should be continued. CUP (PUD/COMMERCIAL) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-017) As part of a conditional use permit, the City of Meridian may impose restrictions and conditions in addition to current City Ordinances. 2. This Conditional Use Permit is for the overall concept only. Future phases of the project will require separate Conditional Use Permits for each phase and each must substantially comply with the final approved Concept Plan. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plan AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 8 3. Conceptually (based upon the submitted Overall Preliminary Site Plan dated 2-01-00), staff believes the project is in accord with the purpose of Planned Developments as outlined in the Subdivision & Development Ordinance. The mixed residential, office, recreation and retail uses meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and should contribute to a reduction in traffic in this area. 4. Planned Development Regulations: As a mixed/planned use development, the Resolution Plaza development must comply with the following sections of the subdivision ordinance: 12-6-4 Procedures for Planned Developments, 12-6-6 General Regulations for Planned Development, and 12-6-7 General Standards for Planned Developments. In addition, residential areas must comply with 12-6-8-A Design Standards for Planned Development -Residential. All commercial and office uses must comply with 12-6-8-B Design Standards for Planned Development -Commercial. 5. Colored Rendering: Colored renderings of the development must be submitted prior to the City Council meeting to meet the intent of Section 12-6-4 of the PD ordinance. 6. Open Space: All Planned Developments (PD) are required to have at least 10% of the gross land area of the PD as common open space as 12-6-7-E-5. The total common open space calculation for Resolution Plaza is shown separately on Sheets 1-3 (Sites "A" — "C"). Site "A" is 4.53 acres (1.44 required), Site `B" is 5.29 acres (1.45 required), and Site "C" is 4.10 acres (1.86 required). These calculations include landscape buffers and islands. Standard practice has been that residential PD's cannot count required buffers and landscape setbacks toward the 10% open space requirement, but commercial PD's have been allowed to count it. Total gross site acreage for the Resolution Plaza project is 47.04 acres (excluding public rights-of-way). 10% open space would be 4.7 acres. The minimum amount of open space has been met. All open space delineated as common open space must meet all standards of 12-6-7-E. 7. Parking: The matrix below summarizes the total off-street parking counts for the conceptual PD -C: Site / Use Parking Proposed Parking Required Site "A" -- -- - Retail pads N of first driveway 3) 257 250 - Retail & office pads b/w driveways (2) 183 181 - Office & day care pads S of second driveway 189 100 (est.) Site "A" Total 629 531 Site "B" (Apartment complex) 553* 460 (2.3/d.u.) Site "C" -- -- - Retail & office pads on Y2K Lane (2) 156 151 AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ.PP. CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z '—." March 20, 2000 Page 9 - LDS Seminar 17 20 (est.) - Office buildings S of Gala St. (2) 129 98 - Retail & office buildings N of Gala St. (2) 317 287 -Ice Arena 278 286 (115 seats) *The Applicant is proposing 152 tandem parking spaces for the complex. The P&Z Commission discouraged tandem parking for a proposed apartment complex of similar size in October 1999 (Valerie Heights). If the tandem parking is subtracted from the total parking spaces, their total provided would be 401 spaces. On the Site "A" plan, a row of parking is proposed along the south edge of the north driveway and along both the north and south edges of the south driveway with no separation. Given the likelihood of these private driveways receiving high volumes of traffic at build -out (functioning more as public roads), Staff feels this design would be unsafe and should be relocated. The first parking stalls are less than 40 feet from the property line and vehicles backing out of the stalls into the drive aisle will likely be a hazard for vehicles entering the site off Locust Grove. The proposed Ice Arena seats a total of 1,430 people. Technically, the Applicant meets City ordinance, which is based on one stall for every 5 seats. If one assumes the arena will utilize the parking north of Gala Street for evening events, an additional 317 stalls could feasibly be added to serve the arena, providing a total of 595 stalls. The Applicant should provide more detail on the hours of operation for the ice arena and their experience with other similar venues and whether or not both rinks will be used simultaneously. 8. Parking Lot Landscaping: Landscape islands serving a single row of parking shall have one tree. Islands serving a double row of parking shall have two trees. A minimum of one 3" caliper tree per 1500 square feet of asphalt (including driveways connecting from the loop road) is required per City Ordinance. 9. Streets and Circulation: Staff agrees with the proposed stub road (Gala Street) to the east, unplatted property. As stated in the Preliminary Plat comments, we recommend access be provided internally with a connection between Sites "A" and `B". There is a conflict between the Concept Plan and Plat for the Seminary site. The plat proposes a flag lot for Lot 4, Block 1 (the proposed 19,648 s.f. office building), with the flag serving as the driveway. However, the Concept Plan shows the seminary utilizing the flag driveway, not the office. Staff does not disagree with the design, but it should be noted for future cross access agreements. 10. Signage: The Applicant submitted a letter from Idaho Electric Signs regarding signage for the apartment complex and a letter from Patrick McKeegan outlining intent for the ice arena signage. The monument signs shall not exceed 70 s.f. All signage throughout the PD -C shall be coordinated and complement building materials and themes. This applies to all future buildings. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 10 11. Storage Areas: Per Ordinance 12-6-8.A.1, Storage areas shall be provided for the anticipated needs of boats, campers, motorhomes, and trailers. No such areas are designated on the Site Plan. Applicant shall either provide a storage area adequate to serve every two (2) living units or provide evidence that storage needs can be met through an alternative method. 12• Maintenance Building: A maintenance building or approved area shall be provided that is suitable for the services required for the repair and maintenance of all common areas as per Section 9-607.H.3. 13. Trash Enclosures: No trash enclosures are shown on the Conceptual Site Plan. Staff recommends all such areas be situated outside of view from either Overland or Locust Grove Roads. Applicant shall coordinate locations and construction requirements of the required trash enclosures with Meridian Sanitary Service, Inc., and provide a letter of approval from their office when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. 14. Hours of Operation: No details of hours of operation are provided. For the future CUP applications, all office and retail uses should be harmonious with the apartment complex and residential homes to the west. 15. Alternative Transportation Options: At build -out, this site will serve as a principal center of employment for the east Meridian/west Boise area. While Boise Urban Stages does not currently service Overland Road, it has the potential to be a likely destination point for mass transit in the future. Staff strongly recommends an area be designated and/or preserved on the Concept Plan for a future bus stop. We also recommend the inclusion of bicycle racks at all office and retail buildings and the ice hockey arena. 16. All conditions placed on this application shall run with the land and shall not lapse or be waived as the result of any change in tenancy or ownership of any or all of the lands governed by this CUP application. All such conditions shall be deemed the requirements for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any use or structure as per City Ordinance. IT Applicant shall utilize the Ada County Highway District design standards for the private street within this development, with the exception of width requirements. Street designs shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Meridian Public Works Department. PD -C Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the concept plan with the above conditions. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ,RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z " March 20, 2000 Page 11 CUP (APARTMENT COMPLEX) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-017) 1- All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site `B" (apartment complex) shall be incorporated here. 2. The Applicant is proposing to construct the complex in two (2) phases, with the first phase consisting of approximately 140 units and the clubhouse. Staff recommends the number of units constructed in phase 1 be limited to a maximum of thirty (30) dwelling units and that no more units be granted occupancy until Overland Road capacity is improved. Overland Road between Locust Grove and Eagle Road is currently a two-lane, non - signalized arterial. Numerous traffic concerns have been entered into the public record regarding the capacity of both Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. Traffic was cited as one of the principal reasons for the City's denial of the proposed Sundance Apartments at the NW corner of Locust Grove Road and Overland Road last Fall. Dobie Engineering's traffic study lists Overland Road (east of Locust Grove Road) as having 11,230 vehicles/day in 7/98. Over the past twenty (20) months, this figure has certainly increased; especially factoring in the new homes built in Sherbrooke Hollows to the south. Dobie's study estimates 1,170 new trips/day to be generated by the apartment complex and 335 new trips/day generated by the ice arena. The study also projects a Level of Service "F" for the left -turn outs from all three Overland Road driveways until signals are installed. The study further assumes the high school, potentially slated for construction in 2001 (which is the same year as the apartment complex), will generate 3,000 trips/day and 250 peak hour trips. Overland Road is designated in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as a 5 -lane arterial with bike lanes to be constructed in 2005. Staff believes that limiting new development on the subject site, to the Ice Arena and thirty (30) apartments would facilitate a smoother transition for the neighborhoods and ease the impact on Overland Road until such time as it is widened and signalized. 3. All applicable Fair Housing and ADA requirements for multi -family housing must be met, including accessibility design for the ground floor units. Handicap parking shall be provided to serve the Clubhouse. CUP (Apartments) Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the condition that only the clubhouse and thirty (30) dwelling units receive occupancy until Overland Road is improved. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. CUP ("THE POND" ICE ARENA) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-015) I. All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site "C" (ice arena) shall be incorporated here. 2. A minimum of seven (7) handicap accessible spaces must be provided to directly serve this AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ.PP.CUP. doc Mayor, Council and P&Z'` March 20, 2000 Page 12 facility. Only two (2) are shown. Revise site plan accordingly. CUP (Ice Arena) Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS The 1993 Comprehensive Plan contains a variety of goals and policies relevant to this application. The following sections most directly apply to the proposed project and are repeated here for the Council and Commission's consideration during the hearing process. Goal 3 is "to encourage the kind of economic growth and development which supplies employment and economic self-sufficiency for existing and future residents, reduces the present reliance on Boise and strengthens the City's ability to finance and implement public improvements, services, and its open space character." Goal 4 is "to provide housing opportunities for all economic groups within the community." Goal 8 is "to establish compatible and efficient use of land through the use of innovative and functional site design." Economic Development 1.1 The City of Meridian shall make every effort to create a positive atmosphere that encourages. commercial enterprises to locate in Meridian. 1.3 The character, site improvements and type of new commercial or industrial developments should be harmonized with the natural environment and respect the unique needs and features of each area. Land Use 1 AU Encourage new development that reinforces the City's present development pattern of higher density development within the Old Town area and lower density development in outlying areas. 1.8U Promote the development of high-quality and environmentally compatible residential areas that contain the necessary parks, schools and commercial facilities to maintain and form identifiable neighborhoods. 2.1 U Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi -family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities. 2.2U Support strategies for the development of neighborhood parks within all residential areas. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ.PP.CUP. doc Mayor, Council and P&Z " March 20, 2000 Page 13 2.3U Protect and maintain residential neighborhood property values, improve each neighborhood's physical condition and enhance its quality of life for residents. 4.8U Encourage commercial uses, offices and medical -care uses to locate in the Old Town district, business parks, shopping centers and near high-intensity activity areas, such as freeway interchanges. 6.8U New urban density subdivisions which abut or are proximal to existing rural residential land uses shall provide screening and transitional densities with larger, more comparable lot sizes to buffer the interface between the urban level densities and rural residential densities. Transportation 1.4U Monitor and coordinate the compatibility of theland use and transportation system. 1.20U Encourage proper design of residential neighborhoods to ensure their safety and tranquility. Open Space, Parks and Recreation 2.5U New subdivision development... will be considered as opportunities to ... encourage the development of recreational open spaces and parks as part of new planned developments. Housing 1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide diversity of housing types... in a variety of locations suitable for residential development. 1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping centers shall be encouraged. 1.6 Housing proposals shall be phased with transportation, open space and public service and facility plans, which will maximize benefits to the residents, minimize conflicts and provide a tie-in between new residential areas and service needs. 1.19 High-density development, where possible, should be located near open space corridors or other permanent major open space and park facilities, and near major access thoroughfares. Community Design 5.2 Ensure that all new development enhances rather than detracts from the visual quality of its surroundings, especially in areas of prominent visibility. 6.5U Establish land -use designations that reflect the character of existing neighborhoods. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ.PP.CUP. doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 14 6.11 U Promote well-planned and well -designated affordable housing in all Meridian neighborhoods. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc RectivQ � OTS S• Z�`AO 'At &,kV4 -floes titsMcs� � IG- - . 70 -T� a y � AR -2 - 2 '2 000 CITY Or YIERMIAN / ''1 Civ v �� ✓! � V' I / { INTERS84 i I -L MERIDIAN CITY f�LIMITS BOUNDARY 500 0 C -G N C -G 500 1000 Feet a s e a 1 1 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 3 9 c�StRfET ,i1BLOCK2 lJJ 3 2 5 4 BLOCK SITE R-4 r � R1ij ' j RT � ' -4 f I� RT BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION REVISION C_ZBRIGGS PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20, T.3N., RAE., B.M., (toe) 34¢9700 MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD SHEET 1 OF 1 BOISE, IDAHO 83705 DESIGN DRAFT SCALE DATE BKB 1•= 500' 02ro1/00 DWG. NO. 0101 10101 APR RT HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT Robert D. Come (208) (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS BUILDING DEPARTMENT Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO v� � Y (zos) 887-221 t •Fax 887-1297 Keith Bird MERIDIANIDAHO 83642 p , Tamm deWeerd Tammy (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 2 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 I• (208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6854 lty of Meiricii_. TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000_ FILE NUMBER: AZ -00-004 REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 16.119 ACRES FROM RT TO CG FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY: G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND LLC LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED) SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C _TAMMY de W EERD, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE �&UILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM & FINAL) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: Z z_'— 0 0 MAYOR H(,,B OF TREASURE VALLEY Robert D. Corrie A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT CITY CITY OF MERIDIAN 1208) 288-2499 . Fax 288.2501 COUNCIL MEMBERS L PUBLIC WORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO+�� BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 to 2 8 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 - Meridian DEPARTMENT of Clerk Offif (208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6854 �. TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn.- Will Berg, City Clerk by: _ March 13, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000 FILE NUMBER- AZ -00-004 REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 16.119 ACRES FROM RT TO CG FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY- G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED) SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR _RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C _TAMMY de WEERD, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE _BUILDING DEPARTMENT _,MRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM & FINAL) YOUR CONC,IS"EMARKS: WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000 FILE NUMBER: AZ -00-004 REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 16.119 ACRES FROM RT TO CG FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY: G L VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED) SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C KEITH BIRD, C/C ---/TAMMY de WEERD, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE _BUILDING DEPARTMENT _FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER FEB 2 9 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS:1*0 Ze,,�-iAr�j -2---27- a 4 -41Z RECEIVED FEB 2 8 2000 Meridian City Water Superiatendenj HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY MAYOR Robert D. Corrie A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT CITY OF MERIDIAN (_08)_88--199 - Fax 288-2501 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PUBLIC WORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird NIERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) S88-4433 • Fax (208) 887-.1813 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-.1218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000 FILE NUMBER: AZ -00-004 REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 16.119 ACRES FROM RT TO CG FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY: G L VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED) SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C KEITH BIRD, C/C ---/TAMMY de WEERD, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE _BUILDING DEPARTMENT _FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER FEB 2 9 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS:1*0 Ze,,�-iAr�j -2---27- a 4 -41Z RECEIVED FEB 2 8 2000 Meridian City Water Superiatendenj Mayor, Council and P&Z ~` March 20, 2000 Page 10 11. Storage Areas: Per Ordinance 12-6-8.A.1, Storage areas shall be provided for the anticipated needs of boats, campers, motorhomes, and trailers. No such areas are designated on the Site Plan. Applicant shall either provide a storage area adequate to serve every two (2) living units or provide evidence that storage needs can be met through an alternative method. 12. Maintenance Building: A maintenance building or approved area shall be provided that is suitable for the services required for the repair and maintenance of all common areas as per Section 9-607.H.3. 13. Trash Enclosures: No trash enclosures are shown on the Conceptual Site Plan. Staff recommends all such areas be situated outside of view from either Overland or Locust Grove Roads. Applicant shall coordinate locations and construction requirements of the required trash enclosures with Meridian Sanitary Service, Inc., and provide a letter of approval from their office when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. 14. Hours of Operation: No details of hours of operation are provided. For the future CUP applications, all office and retail uses should be harmonious with the apartment complex and residential homes to the west. 15. Alternative Transportation Options: At build -out, this site will serve as a principal center of employment for the east Meridian/west Boise area. While Boise Urban Stages does not currently service Overland Road, it has the potential to be a likely destination point for mass transit in the future. Staff strongly recommends an area be designated and/or preserved on the Concept Plan for a future bus stop. We also recommend the inclusion of bicycle racks at all office and retail buildings and the ice hockey arena. 16. All conditions placed on this application shall run with the land and shall not lapse or be waived as the result of any change in tenancy or ownership of any or all of the lands governed by this CUP application. All such conditions shall be deemed the requirements for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any use or structure as per City Ordinance. IT Applicant shall utilize the Ada County Highway District design standards for the private street within this development, with the exception of width requirements. Street designs shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Meridian Public Works Department. PD -C Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the concept plan with the above conditions. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ. PP.CUP. doc Mayor, Council and P&Z'`� March 20, 2000 Page 11 CUP (APARTMENT COMPLEX) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-017) 1. All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site `B" (apartment complex) shall be incorporated here. 2. The Applicant is proposing to construct the complex in two (2) phases, with the first phase consisting of approximately 140 units and the clubhouse. Staff recommends the number of units constructed in phase 1 be limited to a maximum of thirty (30) dwelling units and that no more units be granted occupancy until Overland Road capacity is improved. Overland Road between Locust Grove and Eagle Road is currently a two-lane, non - signalized arterial. Numerous traffic concerns have been entered into the public record regarding the capacity of both Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. Traffic was cited as one of the principal reasons for the City's denial of the proposed Sundance Apartments at the NW corner of Locust Grove Road and Overland Road last Fall. Dobie Engineering's traffic study lists Overland Road (east of Locust Grove Road) as having 11,230 vehicles/day in 7/98. Over the past twenty (20) months, this figure has certainly increased; especially factoring in the new homes built in Sherbrooke Hollows to the south. Dobie's study estimates 1,170 new trips/day to be generated by the apartment complex and 335 new trips/day generated by the ice arena. The study also projects a Level of Service "F" for the left -turn outs from all three Overland Road driveways until signals are installed. The study further assumes the high school, potentially slated for construction in 2001 (which is the same year as the apartment complex), will generate 3,000 trips/day and 250 peak hour trips. Overland Road is designated in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as a 5 -lane arterial with bike lanes to be constructed in 2005. Staff believes that limiting new development on the subject site, to the Ice Arena and thirty (30) apartments would facilitate a smoother transition for the neighborhoods and ease the impact on Overland Road until such time as it is widened and signalized. All applicable Fair Housing and ADA requirements for multi -family housing must be met, including accessibility design for the ground floor units. Handicap parking shall be provided to serve the Clubhouse. CUP (Apartments) Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the condition that only the clubhouse and thirty (30) dwelling units receive occupancy until Overland Road is improved. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. CUP ("THE POND" ICE ARENA) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-015) 1. All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site "C" (ice arena) shall be incorporated here. 2. A minimum of seven (7) handicap accessible spaces must be provided to directly serve this AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ.PP. CUP. doc Mayor, Council and P&Z'� ^ March 20, 2000 Page 12 facility. Only two (2) are shown. Revise site plan accordingly. CUP (Ice Arena) Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS The 1993 Comprehensive Plan contains a variety of goals and policies relevant to this application. The following sections most directly apply to the proposed project and are repeated here for the Council and Commission's consideration during the hearing process. Goal 3 is "to encourage the kind of economic growth and development which supplies employment and economic self-sufficiency for existing and future residents, reduces the present reliance on Boise and strengthens the City's ability to finance and implement public improvements, services, and its open space character." Goal 4 is "to provide housing opportunities for all economic groups within the community." Goal 8 is "to establish compatible and efficient use of land through the use of innovative and functional site design." Economic Developing 1.1 The City of Meridian shall make every effort to create a positive atmosphere that encourages.. -commercial enterprises to locate in Meridian. 1.3 The character, site improvements and type of new commercial or industrial developments should be harmonized with the natural environment and respect the unique needs and features of each area. Land Use 1 AU Encourage new development that reinforces the City's present development pattern of higher density development within the Old Town area and lower density development in outlying areas. 1.8U Promote the development of high-quality and environmentally compatible residential areas that contain the necessary parks, schools and commercial facilities to maintain and form identifiable neighborhoods. 2.1 U Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi -family, townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities. 2.2U Support strategies for the development of neighborhood parks within all residential areas. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ,PP,CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z ,-' March 20, 2000 Page 13 2.3U Protect and maintain residential neighborhood property values, improve each neighborhood's physical condition and enhance its quality of life for residents. 4.8U Encourage commercial uses, offices and medical -care uses to locate in the Old Town district, business parks, shopping centers and near high-intensity activity areas, such as freeway interchanges. 6.8U New urban density subdivisions which abut or are proximal to existing rural residential land uses shall provide screening and transitional densities with larger, more comparable lot sizes to buffer the interface between the urban level densities and rural residential densities. Transportation 1.4U Monitor and coordinate the compatibility of the land use and transportation system. 1.20U Encourage proper design of residential neighborhoods to ensure their safety and tranquility. Open Space Parks and Recreation 2.5U New subdivision development... will be considered as opportunities to ... encourage the development of recreational open spaces and parks as part of new planned developments. Housing 1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide diversity of housing types... in a variety of locations suitable for residential development. 1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping centers shall be encouraged. 1.6 Housing proposals shall be phased with transportation, open space and public service and facility plans, which will maximize benefits to the residents, minimize conflicts and provide a tie-in between new residential areas and service needs. 1.19 High-density development, where possible, should be located near open space corridors or other permanent major open space and park facilities, and near major access thoroughfares. Communitv Design 5.2 Ensure that all new development enhances rather than detracts from the visual quality of its surroundings, especially in areas of prominent visibility. 6.5U Establish land -use designations that reflect the character of existing neighborhoods. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc Mayor, Council and P&Z March 20, 2000 Page 14 6-11U Promote well-planned and well -designated affordable housing in all Meridian neighborhoods. AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015 Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP_CUP.doc �!�Uilials t t4To PXcEIVZD 7X AA -R-2 2 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN Cao h C e v,hl % s /V�UV� �eVeA`ki7- 0 P2 ou /P- /a A, a/ �1/Pv /� C-/ a CJyt-7/G� PU � o-se-s',a ICT -11(f U a � � ✓ 1p v S' �_�I c� l�J�• � /?0 w - ---- /s v `y t INTERS 84 I I -L MERIDIAN CITY MITS BOUNDARY 500 0 C -G N C -G 500 1000 Feet 8 I 14LSOR1' 4 BLOCK 3 ET fig 2 2 2 BLOCK SITE UJla X R-4 R1 T 1 RT 1 77 -4 RT t � � BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION REVISION BRIGGS PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20, T.3N., R. IE., B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO (208) 344-8700 SHEET 1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD 1 OF 1 DESIGN DRAFT SCALE BOISE, IDAHO 83705 BKB DATE For -, .NO. 1"=500' 0?01 10101 APR RT MAYOR HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY Robert D. Corrie A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT CITY COUNCIL CITYOF MERIDIAN (208) 288-2499 Fax 288-250' MEMBERS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642;�i tl_l ��, (208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218I) DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6854 amity of Meridia-- TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE.- February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE.- March 22, 2000 FILE NUMBER: AZ -00-004 REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 16.119 ACRES FROM RT TO CG FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY: G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED) SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR _RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C _TAMMY de WEERD, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE ____.E3UILDING DEPARTMENT `FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: 2- Q 0 44 .S MAYOR HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY Robert D. Corrie A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY OF MERIDIAN (208) 288-2499 . Fax 288_250I Ron Anderson . 33 EAST IDAHO cl; ice, ID L PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-22II -Fax 887-297 Tammy deWeerd n (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813,;' 87-4813 : 2, 8 ZQ0U PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 iI Of Meridian DEPARTMENT 884-5533 G y ,t,, Clerk Off""' (208) • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000 FILE NUMBER: AZ -00-004 REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 16.119 ACRES FROM RT TO CG FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY: G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED) SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR _RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C _TAMMY de WEERD, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE BUILDING DEPARTMENT _JPIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM & FINAL) • • III Ali 4 NO IIIW1�'W � TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000 FILE NUMBER: AZ -00-004 REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 16.119 ACRES FROM RT TO CG FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY: G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED) SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR _RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C KEITH BIRD, C/C _,ZfAMMY de WEERD, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE _BUILDING DEPARTMENT _FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER c jV FEB 2 9 2000 CI'T'Y OF MERIDIAN MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL) V�J�+ RECEIVED FEB 2 8 2000 Meridian City Water SuperiatendeW HUB HUG OF TREASURE VALLEY ^ MAYOR Robert D. Coe rri A Good Place to Live DEPARTMENT CITY Off' MERIDIAN ,°s) 2x - Fax 288.2501 CITY COUNCIL MM EBERS BLIC PUBLIC WORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird :�tERID[AiY, IDAHO 83642 208) 887-22l l • Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) SSS -4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PL.\NNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 388-4218 DEPARTMENT (22-08) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000 FILE NUMBER: AZ -00-004 REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 16.119 ACRES FROM RT TO CG FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY: G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED) SALLY NORTON, P/Z KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z _RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z _KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR _RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C KEITH BIRD, C/C _,ZfAMMY de WEERD, C/C _WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE _BUILDING DEPARTMENT _FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT _CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER c jV FEB 2 9 2000 CI'T'Y OF MERIDIAN MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL) V�J�+ RECEIVED FEB 2 8 2000 Meridian City Water SuperiatendeW