Resolution Business Park CUP 00-017MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live
GCt�Q�
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Ron Anderson
CITY OF MERIDIAN (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501
PUBLIC WORKS
33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Keith Bird
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297
Tammy deWeerd
Cherie McCandless
(208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218
PLANNING AND ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854
MEMORANDUM: March 20, 2000
To: Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council t CEIVE]J
From: Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Technician. MAR 2 o 2000
Brad Hawkins -Clark, Planner3AC. City of Meridian
Christy Richardson, Planner, City Clerk Office.
Re: - Request for a Annexation and Zoning of 16.1 Acres from R -T to C -G by
Overland, L.L.C. (File AZ -00-004)
- Rezone of 37.6 Acres from R-4 to L -O by G.L. Voigt (File RZ-00-003)
- Preliminary Plat of 107.06 Acres by G.L. Voigt (File PP -00-006)
- Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Commercial Development
(RESOLUTION PLAZA) consisting of Multi -Family, Commercial, Office
and LDS Seminary in the proposed L -O and C -G Zones (File CUP -00-017)
- Conditional Use Permit for a 200 Unit Luxury Apartment Complex by Desert
West Properties, L.L.C. (File CUP -00-015)
- Conditional Use Permit for a 86,160 Square Foot Ice Ar6na by Pat McKeegan
(File CUP -00-016)
We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the
applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by
motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATIONS SUMMARY
There are six (6) separate applications covered in this report, each addressed separately after the
summary. Five of the applications are associated with two parcels and propose a Planned
Commercial Development (PD -C), generally located at the SE corner of Overland and South
Locust Grove Roads. The sixth application (preliminary plat) also includes a 55 -acre parcel to
the south of the PD -C owned by the Meridian School District and site of a future high school.
The PD -C proposed uses include retail, office, an LDS Seminary, a 1,430 -seat ice hockey arena
(two rinks), a daycare and a 200 -unit luxury apartment complex. The annexation application
applies only to the 16 -acre parcel west of the Hunter Lateral. The rezone application applies only
to the 37.64 -acre parcel south of Overland and east of the Hunter.
Since ACHD has not yet submitted a report on the Preliminary Plat or three (3) CUP
applications, Staff is recommending these four (4) applications be continued or tabled.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006 Resolution Pla .AZ.RZ. PP,CUP.doc
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 2
r..
LOCATION
The property is generally located at the SE corner of Overland Road and South Locust Grove
Road with approximately %2 mile of frontage along Overland. The future high school parcel is
currently land -locked and directly south of the 36 -acre parcel.
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
North — R.V. park, Cesco (John Deere), Transport, Truck & Trailers, future location of Treasure
Valley Music, and two vacant parcels. All are zoned C -G (Meridian).
South — An LDS church is currently being constructed on the Ada County parcel immediately
south of the Overland, LLC parcel fronting on Locust Grove. Rim View Subdivision, zoned R1
in Ada County, is south of the church. Raven Hill and Los Alamitos Subdivision, zoned R4
(Meridian), lie south of the school parcel.
East — Several large, vacant parcels currently in agricultural use are east of the subject parcels.
All are zoned RT (Ada County).
West — Several phases of Sportsman Pointe Subdivision, zoned R4, lies across Locust Grove
Road to the west. There is also an unplatted, triangular shaped parcel at the SW corner of the
intersection that is not in City limits, zoned RT (Ada Co.), with a single family residence.
CURRENT OWNERS OF RECORD
Gary L. Voigt is the property owner of the 37.6 acre parcel. Craig Groves and Greg Johnson
(Overland LLC) are the owners of the 16.1 acre parcel. Meridian Joint School District No. 2 is
the owner of the 55 acre parcel. All owners have submitted consent to be a part of these
applications.
GENERAL COMMENTS/OVERVIEW (All Applications)
1. The 1993 Meridian Comprehensive Plan was amended by Resolution #266 (File CPA -99-
005) for the Voigt and Overland LLC parcels from . Single Family Residential to
Mixed/Planned Use Development on 11-16-99 by action of the City Council. Under the
amended Mixed Use designation, the proposed uses are permitted.
2. The applicant has proposed a tentative phasing plan consisting of four levels of priority:
Phase I - Ice Hockey Facility (Construction anticipated in year 2000)
Phase II - Apartment Complex Site `B" (Construction anticipated in year 2001)
Phase III - Office/Retail Site "C" (Schedule dependent on tenant sales)
Phase IV - Commercial/Office Site "A" (Applicant anticipates that this corner will
not develop until the Locust Grove overpass is constructed.)
NOTE: The Final Plat must be recorded prior to issuance of any building permits or Certificates
of Zoning Compliance.
3. The Meridian School District will be a party to the preliminary plat at the City's request. The
Meridian School District does not support nor oppose the Resolution Plaza project. It should
be noted that the School District plans a High School on their 54.99 acre site. Development
of the school site is contingent on a bond issue. The school district has indicated that a bond
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza.AZ.RZPP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 3
issue for the high school will be submitted for a vote in the fall of 2000. If approved,
construction of the school will take place in 2001.
4. On July 19, 1999, the APA (COMPASS) Board of Directors moved the proposed Locust
Grove/I-84 overpass from the Destination 2020 Plan (soft projection) to the Transportation
Improvement Plan (hard planning document). APA projects a dramatic increase in traffic for
South Locust Grove when the overpass is constructed and they support a transportation
management plan be developed for this project to coordinate the commuter needs of future
residents and employees.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (All Applications)
1. Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this
project shall be tiled per City Ordinance. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the
site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district,
with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department.
No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project.
2- Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be
removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for non-
domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
3. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with City of Meridian Zoning and
Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements.
4. Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of
Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.
5. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required
and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site
drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site.
6. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any
nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section.
7. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian
Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing
signs will be permitted.
8. Provide five -foot -wide sidewalks in accordance.with City Ordinance.
9. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities
Act.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 4
,--N
ANNEXATION & ZONING REQUIREMENTS (File AZ -00-004)
1 • The legal description submitted in the application appears to meet the requirements of the
City of Meridian and State Tax Commission. The parcel is contiguous to the existing
corporate city limits of Meridian.
2. Staff agrees with the Applicant's forecast that the Overland/Locust Grove area will
become a major intersection, especially with the construction of the I-84/Locust Grove
overpass. Staff also agrees that neighborhood commercial services are needed in this area
to service the existing residential subdivisions and proposed apartment complex
residents. However, we do not support the proposed C -G zone. Staff recommends a
lower -intensity commercial zone Neighborhood Commercial (C N). All of the proposed
uses listed in item #10 of the application (retail,, day care, and office) are permitted either
outright or with a CUP in both the C -N and C -G. But there are several uses permitted in
the C -G that are prohibited in the C -N, including auto repair, service stations, hotels,
truck stops, heavy equipment sales and auto sales lots. Given the previously stated
concerns of the Sportsman Pointe and Los Alamitos residents and the increased number
of children in the apartment complex, Staff feel the down -zoned C -N is a more
appropriate zone and will adequately meet the development intentions of the Applicant.
3. The subject lots can be adequately served by public facilities, and the proposed uses will
allow for orderly expansion of the city limits.
4. A Development Agreement will be required as a condition of annexation
Annexation Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the annexation but denial of the requested C -G zone. We
recommend C -N zoning.
REZONE REQUIREMENTS (File RZ-00-003)
1. The legal description submitted in the application appears to meet the requirements of the
City of Meridian and State Tax Commission.
2. Staff agrees with the proposed Limited Office (L -O) zone. It is the most appropriate zone
for the proposed mixed uses within the Planned Development.
3. The subject lot can be adequately served by public facilities, and the proposed uses will
allow for orderly expansion of the city limits.
4. A Development Agreement will be required as a condition of rezone.
Rezone Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the rezone with the requested L -O zone.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-007, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP. doe
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 5
PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL COMMENTS (File PP -00-006)
Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision
and street names. Make any corrections necessary to conform.
2. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department.
Assessment fees for water and sewer service are determined during the building plan
review process. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Re -Assessment Agreement
with the City of Meridian for all commercial uses. An assessment agreement is a vehicle
that protects the City of Meridian and the Developer in the event that estimated
assessments are not in line with actual usages. The agreement provides for
reimbursement to the developer for over payment of assessments and payment to the City
of Meridian of any shortfall in assessments. The overpayment/shortfall is determined
after adequate historical usage.
PRLIMINARY PLAT REQUIREMENTS (File PP -00-006)
1. Sanitary sewer service to this site will be via extensions from the Five Mile Trunk that is
currently under construction by this applicant. Applicant will be responsible to construct
the sewer mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to
coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes
are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline.
2. Water service to this site will be via extensions from newly constructed mains under the
interstate, and from extensions of existing mains installed in adjacent developments.
Applicant will be responsible to construct the water mains to and through this proposed
development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public
Works Department. Please provide the Public works department with information on
anticipated fire flow and domestic water requirements for the proposed site. Water
service to this development is contingent upon positive results from a hydraulic analysis
by our computer model. Flow and pressure from the existing mains should be monitored
with the Meridian Water Department.
3. Two -hundred -fifty- and 100 -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at
locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at
subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants.
4. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on
site. Please submit hook-up and design details based on the proposed landscaping. Due
to the size of landscaped area, primary water supply connection to the City's mains will
not be allowed. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water
for the primary source. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall
be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ,PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 6
5. Applicant has not indicated whether the pressurized irrigation system within this
development is to be owned and maintained by an association or the Nampa & Meridian
Irrigation District. If the system is being proposed as a private system, plans and
specifications for the irrigation system shall be reviewed by the Public Works
Department as part of the development plan. review process. A draft copy of the
pressurized irrigation system O&M manual must be submitted prior to plan approval. The
City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round
source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the
culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the
developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior
to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. If City water is proposed as
a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire
common open area.
6. Show all existing easements for irrigation/drainage facilities located within the
boundaries of this proposed development (i.e. Hunter Lateral easements).
7. Detailed landscape plans for the Overland Road and Locust Grove Road landscape
frontage buffers and for street landscaping along Millenium Way and Celebration
Avenue shall be submitted for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat
application. This requirement does not include interior lot landscaping. Interior
landscaping will be dealt with on a site by site review basis with future CUP applications.
A letter of credit or cash surety will be required for the improvements prior to signature
on the Final Plat.
8. Staff recommends the Overland and Locust Road landscape buffers be platted as separate
common lots within the subdivision and maintenance be the responsibility of the
Development Committee/Association. The draft CC&Rs submitted with the application
states each separate lot owner in the subdivision will be responsible for construction,
installation and maintenance of landscaping on each building site. By placing
responsibility for the arterial landscape buffers with a single entity (the Association),
greater consistency of design and maintenance may be achieved. At a minimum, the
landscape buffers shall be placed within a permanent landscape easement designated as
such on the plat. No easements are currently shown.
9. Six -foot -high, permanent perimeter fencing shall be required along the eastern boundary
of Lot 1, Block 3, and Lot 2, Block 1, and along the southern boundary of Lot 15 & 16,
Block 1. Submit detailed fencing plans for review and approval with submittal of the
Final Plat. All required fencing is to be in place prior to issuance of building permits.
10. The Applicant is proposing to construct a fence along the east boundary of the Hunter
Lateral. Staff recommends the Lateral be piped and no fence constructed. Given the
close proximity of the proposed 200 unit apartment complex, High School, and Daycare,
staff recommends the applicant be required to comply with Ord. 12-4-13 (Piping of
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ,RZ.PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 7
Ditches). The City required the developers of Raven Hill and Los Alamitos subdivisions
(upstream from subject site) to tile the Hunter and see no reason this site should receive
an exemption from the piping ordinance.
11. Applicant shall provide a vehicular access across the Hunter Lateral from the proposed
apartment complex (Site `B") to the proposed Office/Retail area (Site "A"). The purpose
of this connection is to minimize the vehicular impact on Overland Road and to provide
an internal connection to the Daycare and Retail sites. The Transportation Impact Study
submitted by Dobie Engineering, Inc. assumed 20% of the office and day care traffic
would be captured within the complex. However, this capturing cannot take place unless
an internal access road is provided. If a connection is not provided across the Hunter, an
additional 20% of vehicle trips would be added to Overland Road (based on Dobie's
estimations).
12. Applicant has provided the minimum required 35 feet of landscape buffer along Overland
Road, an entryway corridor. Staff agrees. They show 25 feet of landscape buffer along
Locust Grove Road (including the 5 foot wide detached sidewalk). Since Locust Grove is
not listed as an entryway corridor, Staff supports the 25 -foot buffer width for this arterial.
At a minimum, the Overland Road landscape buffer must be completed from the eastern
property boundary to 30 feet west of Millenium Way prior to issuance of certificate of
occupancy for any building within the subdivision.
13. Applicant is proposing a 30 -foot wide private road (Y2K Lane) to serve Lot 6 and 8,
Block 1. Applicant should explain the purpose for the private classification and whether
or not sidewalks will be provided. All private roads must approved by the City Council.
Staff questions the intent of the private classification, particularly when this will be the
first drive providing access into the site for eastbound traffic on Overland and will likely
be heavily used. If approved, Staff recommends 5 -foot sidewalks be provided on at least
one (1) side of the road.
Preliminary Plat Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions: a) additional
fencing is provided, b) the Hunter Lateral is tiled, c) provide a single vehicular connection across
the Hunter Lateral, and d) landscaping is provided and constructed per item #12. Until the City
receives a copy of the ACHD report, the public hearing should be continued.
CUP (PUD/COMMERCIAL) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-017)
As part of a conditional use permit, the City of Meridian may impose restrictions and
conditions in addition to current City Ordinances.
2. This Conditional Use Permit is for the overall concept only. Future phases of the project
will require separate Conditional Use Permits for each phase and each must substantially
comply with the final approved Concept Plan.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 8
3. Conceptually (based upon the submitted Overall Preliminary Site Plan dated 2-01-00),
staff believes the project is in accord with the purpose of Planned Developments as
outlined in the Subdivision & Development Ordinance. The mixed residential, office,
recreation and retail uses meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and should
contribute to a reduction in traffic in this area.
4. Planned Development Regulations: As a mixed/planned use development, the Resolution
Plaza development must comply with the following sections of the subdivision
ordinance: 12-6-4 Procedures for Planned Developments, 12-6-6 General Regulations for
Planned Development, and 12-6-7 General Standards for Planned Developments. In
addition, residential areas must comply with 12-6-8-A Design Standards for Planned
Development -Residential. All commercial and office uses must comply with 12-6-8-B
Design Standards for Planned Development -Commercial.
5. Colored Rendering: Colored renderings of the development must be submitted prior to
the City Council meeting to meet the intent of Section 12-6-4 of the PD ordinance.
6. Open Space: All Planned Developments (PD) are required to have at least 10% of the
gross land area of the PD as common open space as 12-6-7-E-5. The total common open
space calculation for Resolution Plaza is shown separately on Sheets 1-3 (Sites "A" —
"C"). Site "A" is 4.53 acres (1.44 required), Site `B" is 5.29 acres (1.45 required), and
Site "C" is 4.10 acres (1.86 required). These calculations include landscape buffers and
islands. Standard practice has been that residential PD's cannot count required buffers
and landscape setbacks toward the 10% open space requirement, but commercial PD's
have been allowed to count it.
Total gross site acreage for the Resolution Plaza project is 47.04 acres (excluding public
rights-of-way). 10% open space would be 4.7 acres. The minimum amount of open space
has been met. All open space delineated as common open space must meet all standards
of 12-6-7-E.
7. Parking: The matrix below summarizes the total off-street parking counts for the
conceptual PD -C:
Site / Use
Parking Proposed
Parking Required
Site "A"
- Retail pads N of first driveway (3)
257
250
- Retail & office pads b/w driveways (2)
183
181
- Office & day care pads S of second driveway
189
100 (est.)
Site "A" Total
629
531
Site `B" (Apartment complex)
553*
460 (2.3/d.u.)
Site "C"
- Retail & office pads on Y2K Lane (2)
156
151
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Pla AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 9
- LDS Seminar
- Office buildings S of Gala St. (2)
17
129
20 (est.)
98
- Retail & office buildings N of Gala St. (2)
317
287
-Ice Arena
278
286 1/5 seats)
*The Applicant is proposing 152 tandem parking spaces for the complex. The P&Z
Commission discouraged tandem parking for a proposed apartment complex of similar
size in October 1999 (Valerie Heights). If the tandem parking is subtracted from the total
parking spaces, their total provided would be 401 spaces.
On the Site "A" plan, a row of parking is proposed along the south edge of the north
driveway and along both the north and south edges of the south driveway with no
separation. Given the likelihood of these private driveways receiving high volumes of
traffic at build -out (functioning more as public roads), Staff feels this design would be
unsafe and should be relocated. The first parking stalls are less than 40 feet from the
property line and vehicles backing out of the stalls into the drive aisle will likely be a
hazard for vehicles entering the site off Locust Grove.
The proposed Ice Arena seats a total of 1,430 people. Technically, the Applicant meets
City ordinance, which is based on one stall for every 5 seats. If one assumes the arena
will utilize the parking north of Gala Street for evening events, an additional 317 stalls
could feasibly be added to serve the arena, providing a total of 595 stalls. The Applicant
should provide more detail on the hours of operation for the ice arena and their
experience with other similar venues and whether or not both rinks will be used
simultaneously.
8. Parking Lot Landscaping: Landscape islands serving a single row of parking shall have
one tree. Islands serving a double row of parking shall have two trees. A minimum of
one 3" caliper tree per 1500 square feet of asphalt (including driveways connecting from
the loop road) is required per City Ordinance.
9. Streets and Circulation: Staff agrees with the proposed stub road (Gala Street) to the east,
unplatted property. As stated in the Preliminary Plat comments, we recommend access be
provided internally with a connection between Sites "A" and "B". There is a conflict
between the Concept Plan and Plat for the Seminary site. The plat proposes a flag lot for
Lot 4, Block 1 (the proposed 19,648 s.f. office building), with the flag serving as the
driveway. However, the Concept Plan shows the seminary utilizing the flag driveway, not
the office. Staff does not disagree with the design, but it should be noted for future cross
access agreements.
10. Signage: The Applicant submitted a letter from Idaho Electric Signs regarding signage
for the apartment complex and a letter from Patrick McKeegan outlining intent for the ice
arena signage. The monument signs shall not exceed 70 s.f. All signage throughout the
PD -C shall be coordinated and complement building materials and themes. This applies
to all future buildings.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ.PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 10
11. Storage Areas: Per Ordinance 12-6-8-A.1, Storage areas shall be provided for the
anticipated needs of boats, campers, motorhomes, and trailers. No such areas are
designated on the Site Plan. Applicant shall either provide a storage area adequate to
serve every two (2) living units or provide evidence that storage needs can be met
through an alternative method.
12. Maintenance Building: A maintenance building or approved area shall be provided that is
suitable for the services required for the repair and maintenance of all common areas as
per Section 9-607.H.3.
13. Trash Enclosures: No trash enclosures are shown on the Conceptual Site Plan. Staff
recommends all such areas be situated outside of view from either Overland or Locust
Grove Roads. Applicant shall coordinate locations and construction requirements of the
required trash enclosures with Meridian Sanitary Service, Inc., and provide a letter of
approval from their office when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance.
14. Hours of Operation: No details of hours of operation are provided. For the future CUP
applications, all office and retail uses should be harmonious with the apartment complex
and residential homes to the west.
15. Alternative Transportation Options: At build -out, this site will serve as a principal center
of employment for the east Meridian/west Boise area. While Boise Urban Stages does not
currently service Overland Road, it has the potential to be a likely destination point for
mass transit in the future. Staff strongly recommends an area be designated and/or
preserved on the Concept Plan for a future bus stop. We also recommend the inclusion of
bicycle racks at all office and retail buildings and the ice hockey arena.
16. All conditions placed on this application shall run with the land and shall not lapse or be
waived as the result of any change in tenancy or ownership of any or all of the lands
governed by this CUP application. All such conditions shall be deemed the requirements
for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any use or structure as per City
Ordinance.
17. Applicant shall utilize the Ada County Highway District design standards for the private
street within this development, with the exception of width requirements. Street designs
shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Meridian Public Works Department.
PD -C Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the concept plan with the above conditions. The hearing should be
continued until ACHD submits a report.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Pla a.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 11
CUP (APARTMENT COMPLEX) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-017)
I. All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site "B" (apartment complex)
shall be incorporated here.
2. The Applicant is proposing to construct the complex in two (2) phases, with the first phase
consisting of approximately 140 units and the clubhouse. Staff recommends the number of
units constructed in phase 1 be limited to a maximum of thirty (30) dwelling units and that no
more units be granted occupancy until Overland Road capacity is improved.
Overland Road between Locust Grove and Eagle Road is currently a two-lane, non -
signalized arterial. Numerous traffic concerns have been entered into the public record
regarding the capacity of both Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. Traffic was cited as
one of the principal reasons for the City's denial of the proposed Sundance Apartments at the
NW corner of Locust Grove Road and Overland Road last Fall. Dobie Engineering's traffic
study lists Overland Road (east of Locust Grove Road) as having 11,230 vehicles/day in
7/98. Over the past twenty (20) months, this figure has certainly increased; especially
factoring in the new homes built in Sherbrooke Hollows to the south. Dobie's study estimates
1,170 new trips/day to be generated by the apartment complex and 335 new trips/day
generated by the ice arena. The study also projects a Level of Service "F" for the left -turn
outs from all three Overland Road driveways until signals are installed. The study further
assumes the high school, potentially slated for construction in 2001 (which is the same year
as the apartment complex), will generate 3,000 trips/day and 250 peak hour trips.
Overland Road is designated in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as a 5 -lane
arterial with bike lanes to be constructed in 2005. Staff believes that limiting new
development on the subject site, to the Ice Arena and thirty (30) apartments would facilitate a
smoother transition for the neighborhoods and ease the impact on Overland Road until such
time as it is widened and signalized.
3. All applicable Fair Housing and ADA requirements for multi -family housing must be met,
including accessibility design for the ground floor units. Handicap parking shall be provided
to serve the Clubhouse.
CUP (Apartments) Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the condition that only the
clubhouse and thirty (30) dwelling units receive occupancy until Overland Road is improved.
The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report.
CUP ("THE POND ICE ARENA) REQUIREMENTS, (File CUP -00-015)
1. All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site "C" (ice arena) shall be
incorporated here.
2. A minimum of seven (7) handicap accessible spaces must be provided to directly serve this
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ,PP,CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 12
facility. Only two (2) are shown. Revise site plan accordingly.
-CUP (Ice Arena) Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The hearing should be continued until
ACHD submits a report.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS
The 1993 Comprehensive Plan contains a variety of goals and policies relevant to this
application. The following sections most directly apply to the proposed project and are repeated
here for the Council and Commission's consideration during the hearing process.
Goal 3 is "to encourage the kind of economic growth and development which supplies
employment and economic self-sufficiency for existing and future residents, reduces the present
reliance on Boise and strengthens the City's ability to finance and implement public
improvements, services, and its open space character."
Goal 4 is "to provide housing opportunities for all economic groups within the community."
Goal 8 is "to establish compatible and efficient use of land through the use of innovative and
functional site design."
Economic Development
1.1 The City of Meridian shall make every effort to create a positive atmosphere that
encourages... commercial enterprises to locate in Meridian.
1.3 The character, site improvements and type of new commercial or industrial developments
should be harmonized with the natural environment and respect the unique needs and
features of each area.
Land Use
1.4U Encourage new development that reinforces the City's present development pattern of
higher density development within the Old Town area and lower density development in
outlying areas.
1.8U Promote the development of high-quality and environmentally compatible residential
areas that contain the necessary parks, schools and commercial facilities to maintain and
form identifiable neighborhoods.
2.1 U Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi -family,
townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the
City with a range of affordable housing opportunities.
2.2U Support strategies for the development of neighborhood parks within all residential areas.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 13
2.3U Protect and maintain residential neighborhood property values, improve each
neighborhood's physical condition and enhance its quality of life for residents.
4.8U Encourage commercial uses, offices and medical -care uses to locate in the Old Town
district, business parks, shopping centers and near high-intensity activity areas, such as
freeway interchanges.
6.8U New urban density subdivisions which abut or are proximal to existing rural residential
land uses shall provide screening and transitional densities with larger, more comparable
lot sizes to buffer the interface between the urban level densities and rural residential
densities.
Transportation
1.4U Monitor and coordinate the compatibility of the land use and transportation system.
1.20U Encourage proper design of residential neighborhoods to ensure their safety and
tranquility.
Open Space Parks and Recreation
2.5U New subdivision development... will be considered as opportunities to ... encourage the
development of recreational open spaces and parks as part of new planned developments.
Housing
1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide diversity of housing types ... in a
variety of locations suitable for residential development.
1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping
centers shall be encouraged.
1.6 Housing proposals shall be phased with transportation, open space and public service and
facility plans, which will maximize benefits to the residents, minimize conflicts and
provide a tie-in between new residential areas and service needs.
1.19 High-density development, where possible, should be located near open space corridors
or other permanent major open space and park facilities, and near major access
thoroughfares.
Community Design
5.2 Ensure that all new development enhances rather than detracts from the visual quality of
its surroundings, especially in areas of prominent visibility.
6.5U Establish land -use designations that reflect the character of existing neighborhoods.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 14
6.11U Promote well-planned and well -designated affordable housing in all Meridian
neighborhoods.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc
MAR -22-2000 12:22 BR,JGGS ENGINEERING INC.
March 22, 2000
Mr. Brad Hawkins -Clary
Mr_ Bruce Freckleton
City of Meridian
200 E. Carlton, Suite 201
Meridian, Idaho 83642
i SURVEYOiis
— 12083452950 P.02
1800 West Overland Road
Boise, Idaho 83705 – 3142
Voice (208) 344-9700
Fax (208) 345-2950
E-mail briggs@micron.net
Re: Resolution Plaza (Annexation, Rezone, Preliminary Plat, PUD & Conditional Use Applications)
Dear Brad and Bruce:
This letter is in response to staff comments dated March 20, 2000
General Comments:
I . We are in agreement.
2. The phasing information is correct.
3. The School District information is correct.
4_ We would like more detailed information on transportation management plans.
General Requirements:
I. Internal irrigation and drainage ditches will be piped_ The Hunter Lateral adjoining the west
boundary of the Voigt property will be piped. The section of the adjoining Hunter Lateral
which abuts the Meridian School District property will be the responsibility of the District if
piping is required for Lot 1, Block 1.
2. A septic system and two wells presently exist on the property. The septic system and residential
well will be removed per City Ordinance. The second well was used for agricultural purposes.
We are exploring the possible use of the well as a secondary pressure irrigation source_
3. The applicant will comply.
4. The applicant will comply.
5. The applicant will provide a drainage plan. A drainage ditch traverses the subject property. The
ditch receives run-off from the property. We may explore approval to discharge the pre -
development flow.
6. The applicant wi ll comply.
7. The applicant will comply.
8. The applicant will comply.
9. The applicant will comply.
0101\ClryMer Hawkins -Clark Response.ltr
MAR -22-2000 12:23 BRAGS ENGINEERING, INC. 12083452950 P.03
Annexation and Zoning Requirements: (bile AZ -00-004)
1. Acceptable.
2. Staffs recommendation for Neighborhood Commercial (CN) zoning is acceptable since the
anticipated uses would be allowed within the CN designation.
3. We are in agreement.
4. The applicant will comply and enter into a development agreement.
Rezone Requirements :(File R2-00-003)
1. We are in agreement.
2. We are in agreement.
3. We are in agreement.
4. The applicant will comply and enter into a development agreement.
Preliminary Plat General Comments: (File PP -00-006)
1. The subdivision name Resolution Subdivision has been approved by the Ada County Engineer.
The Street Name: Committee has reviewed the proposed street name and has issued an
evaluation and approval.
2. The applicant will comply.
3_ The applicant will comply.
Preliminary Plat Requirements: (File PP -00-006)
1. The applicant will comply.
2. The applicant will comply.
3. The applicant will comply.
4. The applicant will provide pressure irrigation to all lots with the exception of Lot 1,
Block 1 (Meridian School District .lot). We have contacted the School District concerning
participation in a joint pump station. However, if the District believes financial
participation is premature, since their irrigation needs are unknown at this time. We will
proceed with an independent station.
5. The applicant intends to design and construct the pressure irrigation facilities to Nampa
Meridian Irrigation District Standards. The system will be owned and maintained by
Nampa Meridian irrigation District with approval by the District Board.
An agricultural well exists on the G. L. Voigt parcel. The well was historically used for a
dairy. We intend to utilize the well as a secondary source if approval from Idaho
Department of Water Resources can be obtained.
6. The applicant will delineate the NM1D easement for the ITunter Lateral on the plat. No
other irrigation easements exist on the subject properties.
7. The applicant will comply.
8. The applicant intends to provide landscape easements along Locust Grove and
Overland Roads. An association will be formed to govern perimeter landscaping.
9. The applicant will comply.
0 10 1 \CityMer Hawkins -Clark Response.ltr
MAR -22-2000 12:23 BRAGS ENGINEERING, INC. 12083452950 P.04
10. The developer of the apartment complex believes a fence along their western
boundary is nmessary as a buffer and for security purposes. Interconnection can be
accomplished with pedestrian pathways and (1) vehicular connection as requested
in Condition No. 11.
The applicant will pipe the Hunter Lateral as requested by staff.
11. A vehicular connection between Site A & B could be accomplished from the driveway
between building 7 & 8. If the daycare building size were reduced and the driveway
angles north to intersect just above the tragic circle.
12. The applicant will comply.
13. The private road functions as a joint private access between Lot 8 & 6, Block 1 and
Millennium Way. This access could be accomplished with an easement or cross
access agreement for a driveway. The applicant did not intend the driveway to be
constructed with curbs, gutter and sidewalk.
CLJP (PTJD/Commereial)Requirements: (File CIJP-00-017)
1. The applicant understands.
2. The applicant understands the approval is conceptual and future uses will require site
specific conditional use approval. The staff and commission must understand the term
conceptual. Final development plans will most likely reflect minor deviations from the
concept_
3. The applicant is in agreement.
4. The applicant will comply with the requirements of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance as
follows: Sections 12-6-4, 12-6-6, 12-6-7 & 12-6-8-13.
The applicant disagrees with the requirements of Section 12-6-8-A (1, 2 & 3).
(1) The multi -family project applicant indicates the parking of any type of
recreational vehicle will be prohibited. Any resident with RV's will need to store the
vehicles at a public storage facility offsite. Therefore, there is no necessity to provide
a storage area.
(2) The applicant opposes the recommendation to provide one additional parking
space for every three dwelling units in addition to the required 2 spaces per dwcling
unit. This section is not a mandate since it refers to the word "may" not shall or
should. The applicant for the apartment complex has provided two (2) parking
spaces per dwelling unit as specified in Section 11-13-15-B of the Meridian
Ordinance. The standard of two spaces per unit is universal in most jurisdictions.
The applicant has also provided attached garages which enhances the aesthetics of
the project with less hard surface areas. Driveways (tandem parking) to the garages
provides additional parking for.guests.
(3) No maintenance building is proposed with the multi -family or commercial
project. The applicants intend to contract with a landscape company for
maintenance of common areas and landscaping. Therefore, this requirement should
0101\CityMer Hawkins -Clark Response.ltr
MAR -22-2000 12:24 13,LGGS ENGINEERING, INC.
be deleted.
12083452950 P.05
5. A colored siteflandscape plan and multiple colored elevations of proposed structures
was submitted with the applications. The applicants will need specifics concerning
additional information required under Section 12-6-4. it is the applicant's belief
that Section 12-64 has been satisfied.
6. The applicant is in agreement.
7. The applicant disagrees with the parking requirement of Site B (Apartment
Complex). Staff indicates a requirement of 2.3 spaces/dwelling unit. The Ordinance
mandates (2) spaces/du. Staff has never required parking in excess of 2/unit on any
previous applications processed by Briggs Fngineering. 1 believe this
recommendation is excessive and adds to *paved areas at the expense of
landscaping/common areas. The Ordinance does not mandate anything beyond (2)
spaces/unit. The parking required condition should be revised to reflect "40011. The
Apartment Complex was designed with 401 parking spaces (garages and open
parking) to meet the Ordinance requirement of 2 spaces/unit. The tandem parking
(driveways in front of attached garages) was considered excess, yet was referenced
on the site plan.
Mr. McKeegan, the architect for the Ice Arena believes the parking provided (278
spaces) will be under utilized most of the time. (See Mr. McKeegan's letter
attached.)
Customers of the rink will have the ability to park in adjoining lots during heavy
peak hours for the rink. We believe a minor amount of over—flow parking is
reasonable. Please refer to the letter from Patrick McKeegan dated March 21, 2000
for additional information on the Ice Arena's parking needs and hours of operation.
The applicant will revise the site plan and remove the three rows of parking stalls
which back directly into the access driveways on Site A.
8. The applicant will comply with landscaping requirements for parking lots.
9_ The applicant is in agreement and will delineate the necessary cross access easements on
the final plat for lots which may share private access driveways.
10. The applicant will comply.
11. The applicant for the Apartment Complex will prohibit the parking of recreational
vehicles within the complex.
12. The maintenance of common areas will be contracted with a lawn care company.
Therefore, there is no practical need for a maintenance building for any of the
proposed developments.
13. A site plan was sent to Meridian Sanitary Services for their review and comment. A
meeting has been scheduled with Bill Gregory, Meridian Sanitary Services on March 22,
2000 to obtain recommendations for trash enclosure locations. The applicant will comply.
14. See letter from Patrick McKeegan concerning hours of operation for the Ice Arena_
We agree that hours of operation are important in order to coexist with existing
residential development and the proposed multi -family development.
15. An easement for a possible future bus stop could be provided on the plat.
0101\CityMer Hawkins -Clark Response.in-
BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. 1208345950 P. 86
.+•.•vvv �--v_•r^.•,SSW se. Arsoff— iovv 2
vv uvdnana K' – b( _Idaho 08/45 2 ups) 344-9 6
The inclusion of bicycle racks within the development is acceptable.
16. The applicant is in agreement.
IT The applicant proposes the V21K Lane as a private driveway. The applicant does not
intend to construct this as a public street with curb, gutter and sidewalk
CUP (Annttrnent Complexl Requirements: (File CUP -00-017)
1. The applicant agrees, with the exception of those conditions which we have documented
our opposition.
2. The applicant disagrees with the limitation of the apartment complex to 30 units. it is not
economically feasible to construct the necessary infrastructure (i.e. clubhouse, pool,
sewer, water, roadways & parking) to accommodate 30 units. (See letter from Desert
West, LLC.)
It is our desire to encourage ACM) to consider a private/public effort to improve Overland
Road.
3. The applicant will comply with ADA requirements.
CUP ("The Pond" Ice Arena) Requirements: ffile CUP -00-015)
1 • The applicant agrees with the exception of those conditions which we have documented
opposition.
2. The applicant will comply. (See Patrick McKeegan's letter dated March 21, 2000.)
Sincerely,
BRl S E-NGINEERING, I
OL.
Becky L. Bowcutt
Land Use Planner
BLB:fc
01011CityMer Hawkins -Clark Response.ltr
'IAR-22-2000 12:25 BPACQGS ENGINEERING, INC. 12083452950 P.07
Patrick
W Keepn
Architects
419 S. eth Street, Suite 9
Boise, Idaho 83702-7157
208.424.8608 Fax 208.424.8609
www_ mckeeganarch.com
March 21, 2000
Becky Bowcutt
Briggs Engineering
1800 W. Overland road
Boise, ID 83705
Re: Pond Ice Arena CUP Report Response
Project No. 99052
Dear Becky,
I have reviewed Meridian's comments and am pleased with the positive response. My response
to their comments on the Ice Facility follows. For clarity I have indicated the City's page and
paragraph number.
Page 3, Item 4: Transportation Management Plan. We support the concept and would
participate in a development wide plan.
Page 3, Item 5: Drainage. Will there be a development wide drainage plan or will we be
required to maintain all4rainage on our parcel? Our civil engineer has indicated that we can
accommodate our drainage runoff on our parcel.
Page 4, Item 2: C -N zoning. I assume that since staff has not stated the Ice Rink use is not
allowed in the C•N zoning that it is. We have no problem with the designation for our use.
Page 5, Item 4 and Page 6 Item 5: Pressurized irrigation system. Will this be a development
wide system or will each parcel be responsible for its needs?
Page 8, Item 9: Perimeter fencing. Will the fencing be installed by the development or are we
responsible for the portion abutting our proposed lot?
Page 7 Item 2: Conceptual approval only. It was Mr. Smith's understanding that our application
was for CU approval of our project also. When is the earliest we could apply for our CU?
Page 8, Item 5. Colored rendering. I thought we furnished one with our previous package to
you. I have enclosed another for this submission_
15:45 208 424 f?6@?9 F-01
MAR -22-2000 12:25 $S1GGS ENGINEERING, INC. 12083452950 P.08
Page 9, Item 7: Additional detail on operations. Mr. Smith has conducted focus groups to
determine the feasibility for this facility and what the oommunities needs are for ice related
recreation. He is also actively involved in the local recreational hockey leagues. Much of the
information is proprietairy business information but I can summarized our plans as follows:
There is a need in the area for additional ice facilities. ice World is currently running s
t full
capacity and cannot support the current need or anticipated growth in hockey. y of the
adult participants work: non-traditional hours because of the nature of the major employers
(Micron, HP, etc.) running multiple shifts. There is a need for a facility that will provide around
the clock Ice facilities_
Our facility will be open 24 hours but except for a few Peak periods during the day will not
require anywhere near the parking that is being requested. For example if both sheets were
being used by four teams there would be approximately 64 persons on the ice. During open
recreational skating there might be as many as 100 persons on one or both sheets. Open
recreational skating will be scheduled after school and during the early evenings when the
sheets are not scheduled for practice. The majority of the time the ice will be scheduled by
teams (16 players plus coaches) for practice on a rotating basis.
We anticipate once a month having tournaments or other events that would require the full
parking count. These would usually occur during the weekend or evenings when the office
parking would not be used. We believe the parking we have provided will be underutilized most
of the time and that the shared use for the additional 8 seats is reasonable. We had hoped the
City would allow more shared parking so the total development parking lots would not need to
be so large.
Page 10, Item 15: Bicycle racks. They will be provided at our facility.
Page 11, Item 2: HC parking spaces. 5 additional HC parking spaces will be designated.
If you have any questions, or need more information, please call.
Sincerely,
Patrick McKeegan Architects
Patrick Mc gan
Principal Architect
MAR-21-ZOW 15;46 208 424 8609 P.02
MAR -22-2000 12:25 BAGS ENGINEERING INC.
12083452950 P.09
Desert West Properties, LLC
3/21/00
Planning & Zoning Commission / Mayor & City Council
City of Meridian
33 East Idaho
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Re: Comments on the submittal review comments for the 200 unit Luxury Apartment
Complex by Desert West Properties, LLC
Dear, Commission and council
With regard to conditions proposed m the March 20`h 2000 review of our application for a
Conditional Use Permit (File CUP -00-015) We would like to address the items that
pertain to the 200 Unit Luxury Apartment complex.
Preliminary Plat Requirements (File PP -00-006)
Item 10: It is the preference of the applicant to pipe the hunter lateral as well as construct
the 6' Eence_ It is our opinion that the perimeter fence is necessary to maintain the level of
security and cleanliness that our clientele will expect from a facility of this caliber. We
ask the City council to allow us to provide this important amenity. Thank you.
Item 11: The applicant would be agreeable to this condition provided that we are able to
limit the traffic into the complex to residents only, thereby protecting the project from
drive threw traffic that would be detrimental to the peace and tranquility of our secured
environment.
CUP (PUD/Commercial) Requirements (File CUP -00-017)
Item T. The applicant believes that there has been an error in the calculation of the
required parking. When the tandem parking spaces are deducted fxom the total of the
proposed parking, 401 spaces remain. It is our understanding that there are 2 stalls
required for each of the 200 units equaling 400 stalls.
Item 8: It is our intent to comply with this request fully.
Item 11: It is the intent of the applicant to restrict packing to automobiles and light duty
trucks able to fit into one stall. Storage of boats, campers, inotorhomes, trailers and
vehicles that are inoperable or not used regularly will not be allowed and the owner will
be required to secure suitable storage elsewhere.
MIP- 22-2000 08:35 2c�2 v0 2^ y3:: P.02
MAR -22-2000 12:26 P` 3GS ENGINEERING, INC
— 12083452950 P.10
Item 12: The applicant will be subcontracting maintenance and grounds keeping to a
qualified professional.
Item 13: the applicant intends to conform to this request in full.
CUP (Apart>nent Complex) requirements (Pile CUP -00-017)
Item Z: The applicant has concluded that it is not economically feasible to limit the
number of units that can be built in phase I, and requests that the council delete such a
requirement, as it would interfere with the ability of the business to be profitable. We are
aware of the traffic problem on Overland road, however, it is our belief that by
developing this site fully and paying the ACHD impact fees we will be closer to funding
the expansion than if development is drawn out and funding is not as available. In
addition, the 1,170 trips per day estimated by Dobic Engineering is somewhat
insignificant when compared to the traffic generated by the High school and other
commercial enterprises.
We appreciate responsibility that you bear and thank you for the service you render in
behalf of this community.
Sincerely,
The Principles of Desert West Property LLC
MAR -22-2000 0": 35
Dcscri Wo[ Prvpertics. LLC. PO Box 1070 Mcridim+. Idaho 87642
(208) 6960800 Fax. (209) 898-9527
^.x G 389527
93%
P.03
1Ce Awtic(. (COP)
City of Meridian
Conditional Use Permit
Application Checklist
Applicant:ri��
Project: 7 r—
Date: 9/ /0/ CO
Item
No.
Description
Comments
1.
Applicant contact information
,,X
2.
Property owner contact information
3.
Legal description
4.a.
Warranty deed
4.b.
Notarized consent of property owner
2
5.
Description of existing use(building use
6.
Present use of property (other land use)
7.
Proposed use of property
8.
Zone of property
V
9.
Vicinity ma - 30 copies
10.
Site plan scale of not less than 1 "=50') - 35 copies
V
10.a.
Building location(s)
10.b.
Parking and loading areas
10.c.
Traffic access drives
10.d.
Traffic circulation patterns
V
10.e.
Open/common spaces
10.£
Landscape plan
?
10. .
Refuse & service areas
10.h.
Utilities plan, including:
- Sewer
- Water
- Irrigation
- Storm drainage
10.i.
Signage
10.'.
8'/z" x 11" copy of site plan
10.k.
Building elevations(front, rear and sides
,.
10.1.
Construction materials (may be included on elevations
drawing)✓
('��Lmt. e
1 1.
Surrounding property mailing addresses
12
Characteristics of property that make conditional use
e
desirable
13.
Application and mailing fee
14.
Additional services statement
15.
Application verification statement
16.
Posting of roperty affidavit
10
CAP&Zadmin\CUPCheckl ist2
CITY CLERK FILE CHECKLIST
Project Name: 6& . pa 1ik, File No. CO
Contact Name: k3ec=� 6,au- ctt-� Phone: 3,7 Q 4
Date Received from Planning and Zoning Department:
Planning and Zoning Level:
El
Notes:
Transmittals to agencies and others:
Notice to newspaper with publish dates:
Certifieds to property owners:
Hearing Date:
and
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: [—] Approve F-] Deny
City Council Level:
0 Transmittals to agencies and others:
Notice to newspaper with publish dates:
Certifieds to property owners:
2 City Council Action:
Hearing Date: J-ra rv-,
and _T t t /lam Z-
%l�(
L[ Approve ❑ Deny
Findings / Conclusions / Order received from attorney on: 1-j t , v-, % �-,. 2z,0 C,
Findings / Conclusions / Order:
Approved by Council:
- z_0 - G 0
Resolutions:
Original Res / Copy Cert: Minutebook
ED
Copies Disbursed:
; - ZZ _ 00
Copy Res /Copy Cert: City Clerk
City Engineer
City Planner
Findings Recorded
City Attorney
Sterling Codlflers
Development
Agreement:
Project File
Copy Res / Original Cert:
❑
Sent for signatures:
Ada County (CPAs)
Applicant (non -CPAs)
Recorded Ordinances:
❑
Signed by all parties:
original: Minutebook
Copies to: City Clerk
State Tax
❑
Approved by Council:
I
Comm.
Starting Codifiers
F -]Recorded:
City Attorney
City Engineer
❑
Copies Disbursed:
City Planner
Project file
Applicant (if appl.)
Ordinance No. Resolution No.
Findings/Orders:
❑
Approved by Council:
Original: Minutebook
Copies to: Applicant
F-1City
Recorded: Deadline: 10 days
Project file
Engineer
City Planner
F-1City
Published in newspaper:
Attorney
"RecordVacationFindings"
Copies Disbursed:
Recorded Development Agreements:
p
Original:Fireproof File
Notes:
Copies to:Applicant
Project file
City Engineer
City Planner
City Attorney
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian
and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the
City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street,
Meridian, Idaho at the hour of 6:30 p.m. on March 22, 2000 for the purpose of
reviewing and considering the application of Pat McKeegan (Lee Smith Ice Arena) for a
conditional use permit for an ice arena consisting of office, pro shop, fitness center,
restaurant, locker room and equipment storage generally located south of Overland and
east of Locust Grove Road.
A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's
office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during
regular business hours.
A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested
persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to
submit testimony.
DATED this 1St day of March, 2000.
PUBLISH March 10 and 17, 2000
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CITY CLERK
OF
,"1\\tfJ11if1/!1111
G� PCR�., J ��
`S'. ]AL
1
CR
-r IS1
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian
and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the
City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street,
Meridian, Idaho at the hour of 6:30 p.m. on March 22, 2000 for the purpose of
reviewing and considering the application of G.L. Voigt Develop men t/Overland, LLC for
annexation and zoning of 16.119 acres from R -T to CG for proposed Resolution
Business Park which is generally located south of Overland and east of Locust Grove.
Furthermore, the application requests a rezone of 37.64 acres from R-4 to LO
and a conditional use permit for commercial development consisting of multi -family,
office and seminary.
A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's
office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during
regular business hours.
A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested
persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to
submit testimony.
DATED this 1St day of March 2000.
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR//, CIV CLERK
``litirrJrrrrr
0r- map•
PUBLISH March 10 and 17, 2000,
Eu AL _-
s
E BEAGLE ST
BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC.
gn�wEEgrq
BRIGGS
(208) 344-9700
1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD
BOISE, IDAHO 83705
E PEACOCK ST
EENFFINC-T
E MASnFF ST
MERIDIAN CITY
LIMITS BOUNDARY
C -G
------- - - -r-- -
----I�--
PROPOSED
RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION
PROPOSED ANNEXATION & REZONE
RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION
PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20, T.3N., R. IE., B.M.,
MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO
DESIGN DRAFT SCALEDATE DWG. NO,
BKB 1" =300' 02/01/00 1 0101
600 Feet
REVISION
SHEET 1 OF 1
\0101.APR
ti -A
1. v,]iFvf.vd
WIN."
0
0
X
V)
AN POIN SUBDIVI ION Z1
m
m
o
_ —_ t� _ _ �I/VC .SEC Cr1`(/NfJN _ •• �`n �` �, �
rrrr TT lr-m Y,
c RESOLUTION ..... o..�� r�
- SUBDIVISION s.i■a■
e
PRELIMINARY .SITE PLµ - �TE 'A' �Ym15 RN.p. y.l�gly
D .. ............»... a,
o a ^> S
4�F
6w� E .g
- sv R. v
a �
. R 3
D
I®
I
a
J L
i I
i'• • � ••
Iii�
c RESOLUTION ..... o..�� r�
- SUBDIVISION s.i■a■
e
PRELIMINARY .SITE PLµ - �TE 'A' �Ym15 RN.p. y.l�gly
D .. ............»... a,
o a ^> S
4�F
6w� E .g
- sv R. v
a �
. R 3
8
F 6 1 F
W �1
W
BLOCK 4 u BLOCK 3
9 GALA ST.
-4 3
5 4
BLOCK 1
PROPOSED
RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION
MERIDIAN CITY
LIMITS BOUNDARY
TICK 5T
BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC.
K
BRIGGS
�c
:D
(208) 344.8700
1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD
BOISE, IDAHO 83705
1
PROPOSED
ICE RINK SITE
I
C -G
R—(I, 300 0 1 300 600 Feet
CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST
THE POND ICE RINK REVISION
RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION
PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20, T.3N., R. 1E., B.M.,
MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO SHEET
DRAFT
1 OF 1
DESIGN 17,
CA77F
ATEBKB 1., DWG. NO.
01/27/00 0101 10101.APR
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian
and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the
City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street,
Meridian, Idaho at the hour of 6:30 p.m. on March 22, 2000 for the purpose of
reviewing and considering the application of G.L. Voigt Develop ment/Overland, LLC for
preliminary plat of 107.06 acres, LO and CG zoning for proposed Resolution Business
Park which is generally located south of Overland and east of Locust Grove.
A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's
office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during
regular business hours.
A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested
persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to
submit testimony.
DATED this 1St day of March 2000.
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., alTYCLERK
`\`\!\t,�����ir� �rrrrrrrrf
OF
PUBLISH March 10 and 17, 2000.
jz-�4
.
TIOM10
r/ 377-63oy�
`f
888-�F33
** TX CONFIR�—TION REPORT **
DATE TIME TO/FROM
05 03/02 09:57 208 377 6309
�G3o9
U
AS OF MAR 0;'—"lo 09:58 PAGE.01
CITY OF MERIDIAN
MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD# STATUS
EC --S 01'12" 005 019 OK
l
v
ABB- qcc33
TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian
Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations
to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13, 2000
TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000
FILE NUMBER: CUP -00-017
REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF MULTI -FAMILY. COMMERCIAL. OFFICE AND LDS
SEMINARY – PROPOSED LO AND CG ZONING
BY: G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC
LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND
ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED)
SALLY NORTON, P/Z
KENT BROWN, P/Z
THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z
_RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z
_KEITH BORUP, P/Z
_ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR
_RON ANDERSON, C/C
CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C
_KEITH BIRD, C/C
_TAMMY de WEERD, C/C
_WATER DEPARTMENT
_SEWER DEPARTMENT
SANITARY SERVICE
_BUILDING DEPARTMENT
_FIRE DEPARTMENT
POLICE DEPARTMENT
_CITY ATTORNEY
_CITY ENGINEER
CITY PLANNER
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT
IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM & FINAL)
YOUR CONCISE REMAR
r,
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
A Good Place to Live
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MERIDIAN
(208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501
MEMBERS
PUBLIC WORKS
Ron Anderson
33 EAST IDAHO
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Keith Bird
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297
Tammy deWeerd
(208) 888-4433 - Fax (208) 887-4813
PLANNING AND ZONING
Cherie McCandless
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854
TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian
Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations
to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13, 2000
TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000
FILE NUMBER: CUP -00-017
REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF MULTI -FAMILY. COMMERCIAL. OFFICE AND LDS
SEMINARY – PROPOSED LO AND CG ZONING
BY: G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC
LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND
ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED)
SALLY NORTON, P/Z
KENT BROWN, P/Z
THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z
_RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z
_KEITH BORUP, P/Z
_ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR
_RON ANDERSON, C/C
CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C
_KEITH BIRD, C/C
_TAMMY de WEERD, C/C
_WATER DEPARTMENT
_SEWER DEPARTMENT
SANITARY SERVICE
_BUILDING DEPARTMENT
_FIRE DEPARTMENT
POLICE DEPARTMENT
_CITY ATTORNEY
_CITY ENGINEER
CITY PLANNER
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT
IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM & FINAL)
YOUR CONCISE REMAR
CITY OF MERIDIAN
APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
1"A
NAME: G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, L.L.C. PHONE: 524 -C -Q G 0-0-00 00 '011
ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 20441, IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO 83403/6223 N. DISCOVERY WAY, BOISE, IDAHO
8371.3
G04ERAL LOCATION: NW 1/4 SECTION 20, T. _3Nl_ R. 1 E
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE: PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
CONSISTING OF MULTI -FAMILY, COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND LDS SEMINARY
t G&'
ZONING CLASSIFICATION: L -O ( PROPOSED
I certify that the information contained herein is true and correct.
gna f cant
Social Security Number
LEGAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Pursuant to established procedure, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Meridian Planning and
Zoning Commission will hold a Public Hearing in the Meridian City Hall on
at _.m. The purpose of the Hearing is to consider a
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT submitted by
the property generally described as located at
SUBDIVISION, BLOCK , LOT
TO
for
G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT / OVERLAND LLC
CONDITIONAL USE
(PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT)
"CONCEPT PLAN"
1. G. L. Voigt, P., O. Box 2044, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83403 (Phone: 524-6000).
Overland LLC, P. O. Box 344, Meridian, Idaho 83680 (Phone: 323-4002).
2. G. L. Voigt, P. O. Box 2044, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83403 (Phone: 524-6000).
Overland LLC, P. O. Box 344, Meridian, Idaho 83680 (Phone: 323-4002).
3. Legal Description attached.
4. Deed attached, notarized consent attached.
5. Existing use: Vacant/Agricultural.
6. Present use: Vacant/Agricultural.
7. Proposed uses: Retail, office, LDS Seminary, ice arena and multi -family complex.
8, Present zoning R-4 (Low Density Residential) and RT (Rural Transition).
9. Thirty (30) copies of vicinity map (1": 300') attached.
10. Thirty-five (35) copies of site plan attached, one - 8'/2 " X 11" site plan and example,
elevations.
11. Radius list of property owners within 300 foot attached.
12. This area needs a planned commercial development which provides necessary
services to support the existing residential neighborhoods,St. Luke's Hospital and
the proposed high school. If goods and services can be provided in the suburban
areas, the number of trips on the major arterials (i.e.. Fairview and Eagle Roads)
can be reduced. We are providing an overall concept plan with the understanding
that site specific conditional uses for future uses will be required.
13. Fee attached.
14. The applicants agree to pay sewer, water and trash fees, if any, associated with the
uses.
15. Affidavit of Accuracy attached.
16. Affidavit of Posting attached.
0101\Voigt.CU
Inc.
ENGINEERS / PLANNERS /SURVEYORS ' Boise, .Ida "370 "' 314
Boise, Idaho 83705 — 3142
Voice (208) 344-9700
Fax (208) 345-2950
E-mail briggs@micron.net
February 17, 2000
Mr. Brad Hawkins -Clark
City of Meridian
200 E. Carlton, Suite 201
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Re: Resolution Plaza Applications
Dear Brad:
This letter is in response to your letter dated February 11, 2000 requesting additional information on
the Resolution Plaza application.
Annexation (Overland L.L.C. Parcel)
The 35 copies of Site Plan (A) were submitted for informational purposes. The City Ordinance requires
a minimum scale of 50 feet for site plans. In order to meet that requirement the site plan needed
partitioned into three sections.
Overland LLC site plan is a concept only. The applicant understands that site specific conditional use
applications will be required for all uses on the subject property. At this time no specific information
is available on a future tenant.
Rezone oigt Parcel)
1. Notarized request is attached.
C. U. P. (Overall Planned Commercial Development)
1. Notarized request is attached.
2. a. (10) copies of revised landscape plan is attached.
b. (1) colored 11 x 17 revised landscape plan is attached.
c. A tree species legend has been added to the revised landscape plan, which covers the entire
project.
3. Trash enclosure locations were added to the overall site plan. I met with Bill Gregory, Sanitary
Services Company on February 17, 2000 and provided him with a copy of the site plan with trash
enclosure locations identified. He indicated he will review the site plan and make
recommendations.
4. Conceptual sign locations have been identified on the overall site plan. A letter is attached from
Idaho Electric Signs providing information on the Desert West LLC sign. A letter is attached from
Pat McKeegan addressing signage on the Ice Hockey facility.
BRIGGS ENGINEE"9/G, /-n-C. 1800 W. Overland Road — Boise,"9ho 83705 — (208) 344-9700
Phasing of the project is as follows:
Phase 1: Ice Hockey Facility — construction anticipated in year 2000.
Phase 2: Apartment complex (Site B) — construction anticipated in spring 2001.
Phase 3: Office/Retail (Site C) — schedule depends on tenant sales.
Phase 4: Commercial/Office (Site A) — We anticipate this comer will not develop until the Locust
Grove overpass is constructed.
The public streets (Millenium Way, Celebration Avenue, and Gala Street) and other utilities will be
constructed in the summer of 2000.
Development of the Meridian School District site is contingent on a bond issue. Jim Carberry indicated
a bond issue for the high school will be submitted for a vote in the fall of 2000. If approved,
construction of the school will take place in 2001.
C. U. P. Ice Arena
1. Notarized request attached.
2. (10) copies of revised landscape plan attached.
3. A letter from Pat McKeegan, project Architect, is a attached.
C.U.P. Apartments
1. Notarized request attached.
2. (10) copies of revised landscape plan attached.
3. Letter from Idaho Electric Sign is attached addressing signage.
Preliminary Plat
1. A draft of the CC&R's is attached.
Other
1. Copies of the LDS Seminary plans were submitted for informational purposes only. The seminary
will probably be constructed whenever the high school is built. A site specific conditional use will
need to be submitted by the LDS Church.
2. $6.92 is attached for Sonya.
Sincerely,
BRIGGS ENGINEERING, Inc.
4"4 0-4:9
Becky L. Bowcutt
Land Use Planner
BLB*
0101\CityMer Hawkins.ltr
COMMERCIAL/CONDITIONAL USE
DESCRIPTION FOR
OVERLAND LLC PORTION OF
RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION
January 28, 2000
A parcel of land lying in the NW 1/4 of Section 20, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise
Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the northwest corner of Section 20, T. 3N., R. 1 E., B.M.;
Thence S 89°52'19" E 25.00 feet along the north line of said Section 20 to a point;
Thence S 0°34'14" W 25.00 feet to the intersection of the southerly right-of-way of
Overland Road and the easterly right-of-way of Locust Grove Road, the REAL POINT OF
BEGINNING of this description;
Thence S 00°34'14" W 945.47 feet along said easterly right-of-way to a point;
Thence N 89059'19" E 824.95 feet to a point on the centerline of the Hunter Lateral;
Thence N 05029'17" W 140.30 feet along said centerline to a point;
Thence N 16014'08" W 216.98 feet along said centerline to a point;
Thence N 18°27'39" W 470.81 feet along said centerline to a point;
Thence N 07°06'04" W 150.57 feet along said centerline to a point on the southern right-of-
way of Overland Road;
Thence N 89052'19" W 573.76 feet along said southern right-of-way to the REAL POINT
OF BEGINNING of this description;
Said parcel of land contains 15.23 acres more or less.
Michael E. Marks, PLS - No. 4998
0101\commercial GU.des
DESCRIPTION FOR
REZONE OF VOIGT PORTION OF
RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION
January 6, 2000
A parcel of land including a portion of Overland Road right-of-way lying in the NW 1/4 of
Section 20, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the North 1/4 corner of Section 20, T. 3N., R. 1 E., B.M., the REAL POINT
OF BEGINNING of this description;
Thence S 00024'16" W 849.15 feet along the east line of the NW 1/4 to a point;
Thence N 89052'19" W 1,821.54 feet parallel with the north line of the NW 1/4 to a point
on the centerline of the Hunter Lateral;
Thence N 05029'17" W 20.43 feet along said centerline to a point;
Thence N 16014'08" W 216.98 feet along said centerline to a point;
Thence N 18027'39" W 470.81 feet along said centerline to a point;
Thence N 07006'04" W 175.77 feet along said centerline to a point on the centerline of
Overland Road, which is also the north line of said NW 1/4-1
Thence S 89052'19" E 2,060.97 feet along said north line to the REAL POINT OF
BEGINNING of this description;
Said parcel of land contains 38.018 acres more or less.
Michael E. Marks, PLS - No. 4998
0101\Rezone legal.des
.fit- -�9�3 1'IBPt� Amtri:ta Lead TitA
Wt 1�
QUITCLAIM DEED
For Value Received
Pea Stainaclrert f e { ¢� H r nett who accquired title
as Payr Ste nec r an u=Zrr a perAcn
do hereby coaval, relaw, sulker and forever quit eiaim unto
Overland 16 LLC
whop current address is
6223 North DIscovary Kay, Boise, Idaho 83713
the following deaeribed promises, to -wit:
Sao attached Exhibit "A"
AMERICAN LAND TITLE C.�CORDEQ- RE�3U�5 f
ACA COUNTY RECORDER
J. DAVID NAVARRO
BOISE, IUAVO FEE d� DEPUTY
1998MY-7Pr) 3:44 9804409
PWMW mrd a, W 5=mmadatbn u* h has not been
nixed N do b Sx*WWn, InsunOW or affect on Elbe.
toEathar v kb O e& amorttama&
Dated: April 30, 1998
Pau Stsineekerc Hartnett
WrATZ or MAKO. COUNTY Op'..
ON (/� o of 11,98
Won w6 a netarr pabiia_ia aad for 8tua. penonelly,
y .
Pam Staiaactirt. 'T
iaDwSbed 10 tla�,� atle,iarle�Lai
i 2 • f
pasflra� at }yl
%�cp
:daht'' t14
F
Fma
+�r. 30. 1953 !; ISPIi Amer::an Lane "i t;,
No. 0835 P, 3,`3
EZSIBIT A
BRQI2a MNG AT TAR SECTION CORNNR COMMON TO SHCTIONS 17, 16, 19 Alis
20, IN TOMNSMIP 3 bMRTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MSRIDIM, =A
COUNTY, IDAKO; THX3-=
NORTH /9.31' BAST 593 FRHT TO A POINT IN THE CWMR OP A LATSRJ4I,
OF RIDENRALIGH CANAL] TRBNC9 DOWN TER CDrrMt OF SAID LAT=RA4
SOUTH 4.44' WT 150 Ps THIMS:
SOUTH 16.34' EAST 122 FEET; THZNC8
SO= 19'SS' LAST 490 nMw; THENCE
SOUTH 13.021.RAST 150 YM: THENCE
SOU18 5006' RAST 150 F!=T; 1HENCS
SOUTH $016' RAST 130 F=E'T; Tmmem
SOUTH 11.50' EAST 150 F:= l THENCE
SOUTH 21.36' EAST 48 FSE'!; TZCb)CR L3AVING SAID LATERAL,
SOUTH 89425' NEST 923 FESTr TIMCE NORTH 1.370.1 FEET TO THE SAID
PLACE OF BSGIiililNGI
ZXCEPTLMC THEREFROM THE I+OLLO'aiM DCSCRIBRD PARCEL:
A PARCRI. OF LAW IN THE NORTHMlGST QLWTER OF SECTION 20, TOialiBRIP
3 WORTH. RAME 1 &ABT, OF TRS BOISE NSRIDIAN. ADA COUIM, IoA=,
BRIM MORE PARTICULAFI,Y DESCRIBED AS FOLIAMS:
COWGVCING AT TRE HORTS=AST CORNER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 3
NORTH, RANGE 1 BAST, DOISR MERIDIAN; THENCE
SOUTH 0.34'140 BAST 1,339.09 F= ALONG THE WZST LINE OF SAID
SECTION 30 TO TRZ NORTHWEST CORNER OF RIM VIEW SVWZVISIONj
THENCE
NORTH 49459'19• EAST 25.00 FEET ALCM TS= NORTHI2iLY BOURDARY OF
RIH VIEW SUBDIVISION TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT -OP -NAY OF
LOCUST GROVE ROAD, THE REAL POINT OP BSGZSB+nm OF THIS
DESCRIPTION; THZtMZ
NORTH 0*34'14" EAST 357.59 FERT ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -MAY
TO A POINT: TH%VCB
NORTH 19.59'19' BAST 824.96 FEST TO A POIDFr ON THS CxmTHRLINt or
THE HUNTIR L.ATZRAL; AIAIPO SAID CMMULINE THE T0L.:,OWlM, THIWCS
SOUTH 5.31'22• RAST 47.16 FEET TO A POINT; T23MM3
SOtPrH 6030'22" LAST 211.32 FSET TO A POINT; THBLi'CE
SOCTH 16.11'130 RAST 94.94 PERT TO THE NORTHZAST CORNER OF RIM
VIZV SURVIVISION; TB95=
SOUTH 49059'190 WEST 692.87 FERT ALOM THE NORTH LINE OF RIM VIZN
SEYBDIVISION TO THE REAL, POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DRSCRIPTIOU.
32 a17N 9500110j. DAVE
Bois-,- I D ua.r
WARRANTY DEED FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO •,,
For Value Received FEE,___
RECORDED,'.;
N.L. Patel M.D., Inc, Profit Sharing and Pension Plan,as to a 50% interest; Sanjay Ray M.D., Inc., Money
Purchase Plan Trust, as to a 30% interest and Ravinder N. Gupta, M.D, Inc., Profit Sharing Plan and Trust,
as to a 20% interest
hereinafter referred to as Grantor, does hereby grant, bargain, sell, and convey untols -5001417
Gary L. Voigt, a single person, and R. Craig Groves, a married man as his sole and separate property
hereinafter referred to as Grantee, whose current address is
1965 E. Overland Road, Boise, ID
the following described premises, to -wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
To HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, with their appurtenances unto the said Grantec, his heirs = SI
and assigns forever. And the said Grantor does hereby covenant to and with the said Grantee, that Grantor is>
the owner in fee simple of said premises; that said premises are free from all encumbrances except current
years taxes, levies, and assessments, and except U.S. Patent reservations, restrictions, easements of record, and
easements visible upon the premises, and that Grantor willrwarrant and defend the same from all claims
wh:i: soc ., uF
Dated: December 30,1994.
N.L. Patel M.D., Inc., Profit Sharing and s'
Pension Plan
.:A
3Y: 456 '14,. -7'L
V. L. ?ate', :_uscee
Sanjay Ray M.D., Inc., Money Purchase afS
Plan Trust
BY
rx?
Sanjay Ray, Trustee by Naran Bhai L.
Patel, his attorney in fact II .;+
Ravinder N. Gupta, M.D., Inc., Profit
Sharing Plan and Trust
BY:
(J2avitree't Orv t>t~t ti r iYaf rl7,%�
Ravinder N. Gupta, Trustee by Naran Bhai
Patel, his attorney in fact
First American Title Company of Idaho
EXHIBIT "A"
Part of the Northwest quarter of Section 20, Township 3 North,
Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly
described as follows:
Beginning at the quarter section corner'between Sections 17 and'20:,
Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian; thence
South 06141 East 2,645.6 feet to the center of said Section 20;
thence
South 890181 West 944.0 feet to the center of a lateral; then&e
traversing along the center of said lateral
North 390331 West 232.0 feet to a point; thence
North 120441 West 626.0 feet to a point; thence
North 540381 West 570.0 feet to a point; thence
North 140061 West 202.0 feet to a point; thence
North 210360 West 48.0 feet to a point; thence
North 110501 West 150.0 feet to a point; thence
North 80161 West 150.0 feet to a point; thence
North 50061 West 150.0 feet to a point; thence
North 130021 West 150.0 feet to a point; thence
North 190551 West 450.0 feet to a point; thence
North 160241 West 122.0 feet to a point; thence
North 80481 West 150.0 feet to a point on the North boundary of
said Section 20; thence
North 390311 East 2,062.0 feet to the'REAL POINT OF BEGINNING.
Jan -04-00 09:34A The WP�tpark Co 2088889947
JHrF- _110W 1�;b7 arctuw c,M.,,iccn,.ur ,.... P.02
STATE OF IC
COUNTY OF
I, -A
That I
Dated
ss
(name)
AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST
(address)
&;lg a • I being first duly swom upon
*Y) (state) oath. depose and say.-
the
ay:
the record owner and/or representative of the property described on the attached,
1 grant my permission to
submit the accompanying application pertainhg to that property.
_ _day of Ma n IAC r
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written.
Notiry Pub is for Idaho
Residing at fn Q r, - a 11
My Commission Expires: .
�- .
,�' j• �pTq,R },
t
,,�`
'•.,,�rE `O F. 19 �.0•, TOTAL P.02
'.892068889947 96% P.02
Jan -03-0004:36P VOIGT-.pAVIS REALTORS 208 529-0882
•w t rGGM i rata > IPA_ P-02
22oe3a5''950 P. e2
STATE OF 1
COUNTY OF
That I
AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST
N -W
1W -_j•#:!
.7,od • lCd being first duly sworn upon
(state) oath, depose and say:
the record owner and/or representative of the property described on the attached,
I grant my permission to
submit the accompanying application pertaining to that property.
this 3 day of _ 1 n,-� 49- acv
i
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written.
olk 'Q• •9%%
.N
r
4OTA Iq y : t�
(J 13
�QrF
Of
Notary Public f r Idah
Residing at 1�
My Commission Expires:
1
JAN -03-2000 16 00 TOTAL P.02
208 529 0882 98% P.02
FEB.-11'00(THU) 15:34 KINKO'S— TEL:2083362531
-s.
FEB -14-2000 16:53 BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC.
AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST
STATE OF IDAHO
COUNTY OF ADA
I
ss
}
Name
12083452950 P.02
U 92 z3 N Ca v �EKy W A'
I (DID ddre s
83?1, , being first duly swom upon
(city) (state) oath, depose and say:
P. 003
1. That I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant my
permission to
& -5-
(nae) (address)
to submit the accompanying application pertaining to that property.
2. 1 agree to indemnify, defend and hold the City of Meridian and it's employees harmless from
any claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements contained herein
or as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application.
Dated this �_ day of CC >i
,
(Signature)
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written.
_ No ary Public for Idaho
Residing at —T -
My
My Commission Expires: ,t
A
FEB -17-2000 14:5-3 2083362537 92%
TQTnL n.AP
P.03
FEB. -17' 00 (THU) 15:34
FEB -14-2000 16:S3
STATE OF IDAHO
COUNTY OF ADA
I, kr)
KINKO'S-- TEL:2083362�37
BRIGGS ENG I NEER I NG . INC. ' �)tdJ J,k, ,, YNT3452950
AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST Y
Name
} ss
}
IQ . 6w5;S
:,:,� Z Z3 N - al—sc
sa7ee 100
' S , xA S S7L.3 , being first duly swom upon
(city) (state) oath, depose and say:
P. 002
M
1. That I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant my
permission to
l�vv uJ a
Lih
(na e) (address)
to submit the accompanying application pertaining to that property.
2. 1 agree to indemnify, defend and hold the City of Meridian and it's employees harmless from
any claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements contained herein
or as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application.
Dated this _�day of `"Po
i ure)
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written,
Lry Public for Idaho `�
- . - - Residing at -z��
- _ My Commission Expires:In
s
TOTAL P.02
FEB -17-2000 14:52 2083362537 "< P.02
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCURACY
STATE OF IDAHO )
COUNTY OF ADA )
I, Beck Bowcutt Briggs Engineering Inc 1800 W Overland Road
(name) (address)
Boise Idaho being first duly sworn upon
(city) (state) oath, depose and say:
That I prepared the attached applications and the information contained is true and correct.
(Preliminary Plat, Annexation, Re -zone, Conditional Use and Planned Unit Development)
Dated this day of2000
(Signature)
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written.
'0,01. A* i
,pU B L1G
•t'•'rl' OF 1� �.•`�'
0101 \affid-accuracy
-- 1Vot y Public for Idaho
Residing at �c>/,f�
My Commission Expires: 7-Z5 -,ZZS
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF IDAHO )
ss
COUNTY OF ADA )
I, Donna Wilson Briggs Engineering Inc. 1800 W. Overland Rd.
(name) (address)
Boise ID , being first duly sworn upon
(city) (state) oath, depose and say:
I will personally post the subject property with the hearing notice sign one week prior to the public
hearing for the (annexation, rezone, conditional use, and preliminary plat of Resolution
Subdivision).
Dated this day of
(Signature)
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written.
A'h
° J�....M.•00 tiNotary Pu I c for Idaho
• Residing at I UD
* G My Commission Expires:
:• j'Ua%A
OP 19�oo
0101\affid-posting
a
t
1
i
t
DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC.
RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION
TRAFFIC STUDY
JANUARY 28, 2000
SUBMITTED TO:
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 E. IDAHO AVE.
MERIDIAN, ID 83642
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
318 E. 37TH ST.
BOISE, ID 83714
- DOBIE ENGINEERING, INC. 777 HEARTHSTONE DR., BOISE, ID 83702 (208)345-3290
/1-1 36
RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK
PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 30W (CUP - PUD)
LOCUST GROVE PROPERTIES LLC
KENAI PARTNERS LLC
1109 MAIN ST SUITE #500
6223 N DISCOVERY WAY
BOISE ID 83702-0000
BOISE ID 83713-0000
1545 S LOCUST GROVE RD
E OVERLAND RD
VAN AUKER RONALD W
JOINT SCHOOL DIST #2
3084 E LANARK
911 N MERIDIAN RD
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
MERIDIAN ID 83642-2241
2600 E OVERLAND RD
E OVERLAND RD
PECK CURTIS D & KIM L
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LDS
6149 N MEEKER PL STE 250
50 E NORTH FLOOR 22ND
BOISE ID 83713-1568
SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150-0002
2400 E OVERLAND RD
S LOCUST GROVE RD
HOWELL WILLARD & ANGELA
FARRELL ART V
PO BOX 848
32 W PROSPECTORS DR
EAGLE ID 83616-0000
CASCADE ID 83611-0000
2200 E OVERLAND RD
1695 S LOCUST GROVE RD
2270 E OVERLAND RD
CAMERON MICHAEL J &
CONTRACTORS EQUIP SUPLY CO INC
CAMERON TEENA L
2000 E OVERLAND
1632 S LABRADOR PL
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
PLAYGROUND INC
REDENBO NEWTON C &
4098 N JULLION WAY
REDENBO CHRISTI L
BOISE ID 83704-2763
1654 S LABRADOR PL
1780 E OVERLAND RD
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
JE DOUBLE D LLC
DROLLINGER KELLI A &
4601 N FIVE MILE
DROLLINGER SCOTT
BOISE ID 83713-0000
1670 S LABRADOR PL
1822 E OVERLAND RD
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
OVERLAND 16 LLC
REMKES KARL B & BREEZI
6223 N DISCOVERY WAY
1700 S LABRADOR PL
BOISE ID 83713-0000
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
E OVERLAND RD
VIERTEL EUGENE K &
VOIGT GARY L AND GROVES C R &
VIERTEL JEANNETTE L
R L AND BASS ROBERT & DANA
1728 S LABRADOR PL
1908 JENNIE LEE DR
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
IDAHO FALLS ID 83404-6159
1965 E OVERLAND RD
GEHRING JEFF D &
GEHRING LAURIE H
1550 E PEACOCK ST
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
JOHNSON GREG B
PO BOX 344
MERIDIAN ID 83680-0344
1572 E PEACOCK ST
CONRAD GERALD L &
CONRAD JOANNE C
2181 RIBIER DR
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
1594 E PEACOCK ST
SPORTSMAN POINTE HOA
6223 N DISCOVERY WAY SUITE #100
BOISE ID 83713-0000
S LOCUST GROVE RD
MACKENZIE DON
1551 E PEACOCK ST
MERIDIAN ID 83680-0000
BURKETT BOB F &
BURKETT KATHERINE A
1573 E PEACOCK ST
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
NELSON STEVEN J &
NEI -SON JANET L
1595 E PEACOCK ST
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
AUSTIN ROBERT D & TERESA A TRS
AUSTIN R D & T A TRUSTEES
1834 S LABRADOR PL
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
ROBINSON JUSTIN & AMY B
1564 E PUFFIN CT
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
HINCKLEY N E & BUCHAK SUSAN C
1582 E PUFFIN CT
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
CARICO SCOTT &
CARICO MELISSA L
1581 E PUFFIN CRT
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
PERRY RONALD R & DEANNA L
1886 S LABRADOR PL
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
PAFFUMI ROBERT D &
PAFFUMI ANGELA R
1563 E PUFFIN CRT
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
COMPTON T NEAL &
COMPTON SUSAN E
1574 E MASTIFF ST
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
JACKSON LARRY E &
NASH JACKSON TONI L
1598 E MASTIFF ST
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
MOONEY CRAIG J &
BAIRD LISA ANN
1575 E MASTIFF ST
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
KNOWLES TODD A &
KNOWLES LISA O
1597 E MASTIFF ST
MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000
SEE
son
e}L �_
�GV/eX.S S/Te"'*o� 1EXC UG 4.
PARCEL PRIMOWNER
S1117346610 PECK CURTIS D & KIM L
Z 51117438620 VAN AUKER RONALD W
51117346600 HOWELL WILLARD & ANGELA
R7100270100 CONTRACTORS EQUIP SUPLY CO INC
S R7100270200 JE DOUBLE D LLC
Co R7100270300 PLAYGROUND INC
-7 S1118449300 LOCUST GROVE PROPERTIES LLC
s S1117346660 HOWELL WILLARD & ANGELA
R8075810220 SPORTSMAN POINTE HOA
I c, R8075810230 CAMERON MICHAEL J & CAMERON TEENA L
R8075810240 REDENBO NEWTON C & REDENBO CHRISTI L
/ S1119110025 FARRELL ART V
i3 R8075810250 DROLLINGER KELLI A & DROLLINGER SCOTT
)I R8075810260 REMKES KARL B & BREEZI
1 S 51120212410 VOIGT GARY L AND GROVES C R & R L AND BASS ROBERT & DANA
14o R8075810270 VIERTEL EUGENE K & VIERTEL JEANNETTE L
1-7 R8075810280 GEHRING JEFF D & GEHRING LAURIE H
8 R8075810290 JOHNSON GREG B
R8075810300 CONRAD GERALD L & CONRAD JOANNE C
ac. R8075810310 SPORTSMAN POINTE HOA
S1120121000 KENAI PARTNERS LLC
zz R8075810410 MACKENZIE DON
z� R8075810420 BURKETT BOB F & BURKETT KATHERINE A
z -4 R8075810430 NELSON STEVEN J & NELSON JANET L
Z 51120223302 OVERLAND 16 LLC
R8075810390 ROBINSON JUSTIN & AMY B
Z 7 R8075810400 AUSTIN ROBERT D& TERESA A TRS AUSTIN R D& T A TRUSTEES
Z�( R8075810380 HINCKLEY N E & BUCHAK SUSAN C
R8075310320 SPORTSMAN POINTE HOA
R8075810370 CARICO SCOTT & CARICO MELISSA L
31 R8075810350 PERRY RONALD R & DEANNA L
37 R8075810360 PAFFUMI ROBERT D & PAFFUMI ANGELA R
3- R8075810340 COMPTON T NEAL & COMPTON SUSAN E
R8075810330 JACKSON LARRY E & NASH-JACKSON TONI L
SS S1120223301 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LDS
3�, S1120244300 JOINT SCHOOL DIST #2
3-7 R8075810030 MOONEY CRAIG J & BAIRD LISA ANN
3 R8075810020 KNOWLES TODD A & KNOWLES LISA O
3"J R8075810010 SPORTSMAN POINTE HOA
ADDCONCAT
6149 N MEEKER PL STE 250
3084 E LANARK
PO BOX 848
2000 E OVERLAND
4601 N FIVE MILE
4098 N JULLION WAY
SUITE #500
PO BOX 848
SUITE #100
1632 S LABRADOR PL
1654 S LABRADOR PL
32 W PROSPECTORS DR
1670 S LABRADOR PL
1700 S LABRADOR PL
1908 JENNIE LEE DR
1728 S LABRADOR PL
1550 E PEACOCK ST
PO BOX 344
2181 RIBIER DR
SUITE #100
6223 N DISCOVERY WAY
1551 E PEACOCK ST
1573 E PEACOCK ST
1595 E PEACOCK ST
6223 N DISCOVERY WAY
1564 E PUFFIN CT
1834 S LABRADOR PL
1582 E PUFFIN CT
SUITE #100
1581 E PUFFIN CRT
1886 S LABRADOR PL
1563 E PUFFIN CRT
1574 E MASTIFF ST
1598 E MASTIFF ST
50 E NORTH FLOOR 22ND
911 N MERIDIAN RD
1575 E MASTIFF ST
1597 E MASTIFF ST
SUITE #100
STATCONCAT
BOISE, ID 83713-1568
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
EAGLE, ID 83616-0000
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
BOISE, ID 83713-0000
BOISE, ID 83704-2763
BOISE, ID 83702-0000
EAGLE, ID 83616-0000
BOISE, ID 83713-0000
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
CASCADE, ID 83611-0000
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
IDAHO FALLS, ID 83404-6159
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
MERIDIAN, ID 83680-0344
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
BOISE, ID 83713-0000
BOISE, ID 83713-0000
MERIDIAN, ID 83680-0000
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
BOISE, ID 83713-0000
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
BOISE, ID 83713-0000
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84150-0002
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-2241
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000
BOISE, ID 83713-0000
TAT
�y�i
FEB -17-00 THU 14:45 MCKEEGAN.ARCHITECTS 208 424 8609 P.01
Patrick
_ M1 Keegan
= Architect
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 17, 2000 PROJECT NO:
TO: Becky Bowcutt, Briggs Engineering MAIL O
RE: Pond Ice Rink Exterior Signage
FAX .� pages
Original ill will not O be mailed
Becky — I discussed the exterior signage with lee Smith. At this time he is still discussing the
project with potential sponsors so specific details have not been established. Below is a list of
the conceptual signage we have discussed.
1. Streetscape'. We anticipate having a monument sign located near the circle drive northwest
of our site identifying the complex and individual uses (rink, fitness center, restaurant, and
pro shop), We would also expect to be identified on any complex signage located on
Overland Road.
2. Entry: We envision a two-sided sign at the steel entry element using indirect and neon for
lighting. We will also have fabric or painted metal banners identifiying the uses or sponsors
along the top of the entry trellis. These are shown on the rendering submitted with the
application.
3. Building elevations: We have shown large graphics of hockey players, skaters and other
winter sports related icons equally spaced around the building. These would be painted
metal panels set off of the building. The panels will be backlit with neon and indirectly face
lit with recessed ground lighting_
4. All signage facing the residential areas will be on timers so it can be turned off at night. The
entry and building signage facing the office and retail buildings will be on timers to coincide
with lighting for the remainder of the complex.
We will keep you and the City as we develop speck information on the project signage. If you
have any questions or need more information, please call.
Signed:
Copies:
Fite
419 S.8 St Ste B, Boise, ID 83702 pma@mckeeganarch.com Ph. 208-424-8608 Fax 208-424-8609
FEB -17-2000 14:4P. 208 424 8609 98% P.01
Feb -16-00 10:48A IES l3'44.SE 208 338 9409 P_O2
6528 SUPPLY WAY - BOISE, IDAHO 83716 (208) 336-91401 FAX (2018) 33&9409
A::'
February 16, 2000
City of Meridian
Planning & "Zoning
33 F.. Idaho
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Dear Sirs:
'This letter is intended to serve for information and conceptual purposes regarding the
proposed signage for the new apartment complex under consideration for the Millennium
Business Park to be located one quarter nine east of Locust Grove on Ovc,-rland
Road.
The sign package for the proposed complex suggests two free-standing monument
signs to be flood lit utilizing materials to complement and continue the theme of the
buildings. For instance, the signs would be approximately 10 to 12 feet in length
with an overall height of 6 feet incorporating design elements of the buildings. Copy
would be a brushed brass or bronze lettering in a classic font style.
Renderings for the actual designs can be submitted for consideration pending review
of the project for the complex itself.
Please feel flee to call if you should have any questions regarding this information
or if I may be of service to you.
Sincerely,
Debbie Anderson
Account Representative
FEB -16-2000 10:54 208 338 9409 P.02
i
X1
A
CD
1
N
I2
Sy
�-
CDi 3
I�
N
N
l� (�LD
CD
dF
ID
(D.
-�.J
I
<
CL
_
v
-4-.
o
W
+c .ILA
N
w
W
N
1
CD
N
O
O
>
D
X
O
O
I-
u P
.7t
("j
.__
r�
_
o
v_1
cn _
op
I
N
I
5N'
I
'Sa
I
N
�(,n
N
�
C
CT
w w �
Oa
Q
a a
w 00 1 Fn
o Zr (1)M
Do
O <
N �
�z
Financial
LEE/LYNLEE SMITH FOR HAYDEN SMITH CONSERV Account' 1133
3904 HILLCREST DRIVE
BOISE, ID 83705-4547 62-15/311
lP!,,av,to the
GATdeY Of
. ,I n (�, ,r -L
921 smrmBARNEY
g0 ❑ PNC National Bank
Wilmington, DE
For (1JL ic-. '-,I C— 1J,1 -
1:0311001S?':
J,1-1:0331LOO157i: 120901692LII' 1 1 3 3
Andrea L Mc Gartu 92'126
208-375-6801 1992
Bole, IP -921g X3714 -1 61 y�' `'�` Zl r l de
yut (.t��
KEYBANK NPMONAL ASSOCIATION
BOISE, IDAHO 83701
1-800-KEY2YOU
7X-
NP
1: 1 24 10 15551: L20 -60020G 5 2114 199 2 1
0
•
BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. - BOtSE
3� -J- tg4i 3f.
'73 S
,, 3 0. q7
�.
Y 3i
ENGINEER�,yC
BRIGGS
INC.
BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC.
1800 WEST OVERLAND ROAD
BOISE, IDAHO 83705
(208) 344-9700
FIRST SECURITY BANK OF IDAHO
BOISE, IDAHO 83730
92-6/1241
29752
29752
DATE AMOUNT
-oa
PAY db
TO THE
ORDER
OF
IIa0 2975 211' 1:1 241000641:003 00010 1011' !I
THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS A COLORED BACKGROU O ON WHITE PAPER. MICBOPRINT IS LOCATED BELOW THIS WARNING BAND. TO VERIFY THE ARTIFICIAL WATERMARK ON THE BACK. HOI 1 eT eu eun� r
CD
O
i
�
z�
0
CC)U
o
b
�
CYIJ
n
�
o
c
i
p,
a
3
C
N
y
n
r
OT
3
-
v
3
(,
Z
a
�
�
N
N
�
C
1
�D
x
>
Sn
0
c
N
ANG1117RNC
:1IGGS
N C.
W. Overland Rd. J�
se, Idaho 83705
vN
J
1
n
CDM
LI ca W O O
00
0? m-
d W
SD
a
00 0
CA)
P.
v_
N K
Z
OU,
s.
f
7 f sr
1 -t
/a\
Air
O\
$RUEGGER'S WAI '
uKm ruu 5
nq IPA
Sharon Smith
From: Will Berg
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 2:21 PM
To: Sharon Smith; Tara Green
Subject: FW: Document request
--Original Message -----
From: Liza Morris [mailto:lmorris@colepoe.com]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 11:38 AM
To: Will Berg
Subject: Document request
Dear Clerk's Office,
We represent a property owner in the Resolution Park area near Mountain View High School.
We are preparing a Development Agreement Modification at this time. One of the key
documents we need to see is the Overall Preliminary Site Plan by Briggs Engineering, cited
on Page 1 of 9, Order of Conditional Approval of Conditional Use Permit, CUP -00-017.
We have not been able to locate this drawing in Searchable Documents.
This Site Plan differs a great deal from the recorded Plat on file with Ada County.
Please forward the drawing in .pdf format if possible, or we will send someone to obtain a
copy.
We appreciate your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Liza Morris
cole + poe architects, P.A.
519 West Front Street
Boise, Idaho 83702
tel: (208) 331-3200
fax: (208) 331-3244
email: lmorris@colepoe.com
DISCLAIMER: All drawings, notes and/or data contained in this email or attached computer
file(s) prepared by cole + poe architects, P.A. as instruments of service are the property
of cole + poe architects, P.A., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including
any common law, statutory, or copyrights. The recipient of this information shall not
copy, use, or modify this information without the prior written authorization of cole +
poe architects, P.A.
1
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF )
G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND 16, )
L.L.C, FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT )
FOR A PLANNED COMMERCIAL )
DEVELOPMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT )
CONSISTING OF MULTI -FAMILY, )
COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND LDS SEMINARY)
IN AN L -O AND C -N ZONE LOCATED AT SE )
CORNER OF OVERLAND ROAD AND S )
LOCUST GROVE ROAD, MERIDIAN, IDAHO )
06-12-00
CASE NO. CUP -00-017
ORDER OF
CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT
This matter coming before the City Council on the 20`h day of June, 2000,
under the provisions of Meridian City Code § 11-17-4 for final action on conditional
use permit application and the Council having received and approving the
Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission the Council takes the
following action:
1. That the Applicant of the property is granted a conditional use permit for the
proposed application request of a conditional use permit for the construction,
development, maintenance and use for a commercial development consisting of
multi -family housing, commercial offices and an LDS Seminary, as described in the
OVERALL PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN, DWG Date: 02/01/00 MNM, DWG NO.
990123, SHEET 1 OF 1 SITE, \MIL-PRE1. MNM, RESOLUTION SUBDIVISION,
BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. ARCHITECT, and SITE A: DESERT WEST,
L.L.C., SITE B: OVERLAND, LLC, SITE C: G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT, (ICE
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PAGE 1 OF 9
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT / OVERLAND 16, L.L.C. FOR PLANNED
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / CUP -00-017
RINK ONLY) -PAT McKEAGAN (REP. LEE SMITH), Developers, and, for the
development of the aforementioned planned commercial development for a
commercial development consisting of multi -family housing, commercial offices and
an LDS Seminary and which property is described as:
A parcel of land lying in the NW 1/4 of Section 20, Township 3 North, Range 1 East,
Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the northwest comer of Section 20, T. 3N., R. IE., B.M.;
Thence S 89'52'19" E 25.00 feet along the north line of said Section 20 to a point;
Thence S 0'34'14" W 25.00 feet to the intersection of the southerly right-of-way of
Overland Road and the easterly right-of-way of Locust Grove, the REAL POINT OF
BEGINNING of this description;
Thence S 00'34'14" W 945.47 feet along said easterly right-of-way to a point;
Thence N 89'59'19" E 824.95 feet to a point on the centerline of the Hunter Lateral;
Thence N 05°29'17" W 140.30 feet along said centerline to a point;
Thence N 16°14'08" W 216.98 feet along said centerline to a point;
Thence N 18°27'39" W 470.81 feet along said centerline to a point;
Thence N 07°06'04" W 150.57 feet along said centerline to a point on the southern
right-of-way of Overland Road;
Thence N 89°52'19" W 573.76 feet along said southern right-of-way to the REAL
POINT OF BEGINNING of this description;
Said parcel of land contains 15.23 acres more or less.
AND
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PAGE 2 OF 9
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT / OVERLAND 16, L.L.C. FOR PLANNED
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / CUP -00-017
A parcel of land including a portion of Overland Road right-of-way lying in the NW
1/4 of Section 20, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County,
Idaho, more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the North 1/4 corner of Section 20, T. 3N., R. lE., B.M., the REAL
POINT OF BEGINNING of this description;
Thence S 00'24'16" W 849.15 feet along the east line of the NW 1/4 to a point;
Thence N 89°52'19" W 1,821.54 feet parallel with the north line of the NW 1/4 to a
point on the centerline of the Hunter Lateral;
Thence N 05'29'17" W 20.43 feet along said centerline to a point;
Thence N 16° 14'08" W 216.98 feet along said centerline to a point;
Thence N 18°27'39" W 470.81 feet along said centerline to a point;
Thence N 07°06'04" W 175.77 feet along said centerline to a point on the centerline
of Overland Road, which is also the north line of said NW 1/4;
Thence S 89'52'19" E 2,060.97 feet along said north line to the REAL POINT OF
BEGINNING of this description;
Said parcel of land contains 38.018 acres more or less.
2. That the above named applicant is granted a conditional use permit for a
planned commercial development for consisting of multi -family housing, commercial
offices and an LDS Seminary, located at the southeast corner of Overland Road and
S. Locust Grove Road, Meridian, Idaho, subject to the following conditions of use
and development:
2.A This project is part of a multi -faceted requested development
including annexation, rezoning, preliminary plat and three (3)
conditional use permits and conditional recommendations contained
in AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006, CUP -00-015, CUP -00-016
and CUP -00-017, will apply where relevant.
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PAGE 3 OF 9
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT / OVERLAND 16, L.L.C. FOR PLANNED
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / CUP -00-017
Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as
follows:
2.1 This Conditional Use Permit is for the overall concept only. Future
phases of the project shall require separate Conditional Use Permits
for each phase and each must substantially comply with the final
approved Concept Plan.
2.2 Planned Development Regulations: As a mixed/planned use
development, the Resolution Plaza development must comply with
the following sections of the subdivision ordinance: 12-6-4
Procedures for Planned Developments, 12-6-6 General Regulations
for Planned Development, and 12-6-7 General Standards for Planned
Developments. In addition, residential areas must comply with 12-6-
8-A Design Standards for Planned Development -Residential. All
commercial and office uses must comply with 12-6-8-B Design
Standards for Planned Development -Commercial.
2.3 Colored Rendering: Colored renderings of the development must be
submitted prior to the City Council meeting to meet the intent of
Section 12-6-4 of the PD ordinance.
2.4 Open Space: All Planned Developments (PD) are required to have at
least 10% of the gross land area of the PD as common open space as 12-
6-7-E-5. The total common open space calculation for Resolution Plaza
is shown separately on Sheets 1-3 (Sites "A" - "C"). Site "A" is 4.53
acres (1.44 required), Site "B" is 5.29 acres (1.45 required), and Site
"C" is 4.10 acres (1.86 required). These calculations include landscape
buffers and islands. Standard practice has been that residential PD's
cannot count required buffers and landscape setbacks toward the 10%
open space requirement, but commercial PD's have been allowed to
count it.
Total gross site acreage for the Resolution Plaza project is 47.04 acres
(excluding public rights-of-way). 10% open space would be 4.7 acres.
The minimum amount of open space has been met. All open space
delineated as common open space must meet all standards of 12-6-7-E.
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PAGE 4 OF 9
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT / OVERLAND 16, L.L.C. FOR PLANNED
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / CUP -00-017
2.5 Parking: The matrix below summarizes the total off-street parking
counts for the conceptual PD -C:
Site/Use
Parking Proposed
Parking Required
Site "A"
--
- Retail pads N of first driveway (3)
257
250
- Retail & office pads b/w driveways (2)
183
181
- Office SL day care pads S of second
driveway
189
100 (est.)
Site "A" Total
629
531
Site "B" (Apartment Complex)
553*
460 (2.3/d.u)
Site "C"
--
--
- Retail & office pads on Y2K Lane (2)
156
151
- LDS Seminary
17
20 (est.)
- Office buildings S of Gala St. (2)
129
98
- Retail & office buildings N of Gala St. (2)
317
287
- Ice Arena
278
286 (1/5) seats
The Applicant is proposing 152 tandem parking spaces for the
complex. The P&Z Commission discouraged tandem parking for a
proposed apartment complex of similar size in October 1999 (Valerie
Heights). If the tandem parking is subtracted from the total parking
spaces, their total provided would be 401 spaces, and the parking
shall be limited to the 401 parking spaces for this project.
On the Site "A" plan, a row of parking is proposed along the south edge
of the north driveway and along both the north and south edges of the
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PAGE 5 OF 9
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT / OVERLAND 16, L.L.C. FOR PLANNED
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / CUP -00-017
south driveway with no separation. The likelihood of these private
driveways receiving high volumes of traffic at build -out (functioning
more as public roads), would be unsafe and shall be relocated. The first
parking stalls are less than 40 feet from the property line and vehicles
backing out of the stalls into the drive aisle would likely be a hazard for
vehicles entering the site off Locust Grove.
The proposed Ice Arena seats a total of 1,430 people. Technically, the
Applicant meets City ordinance, which is based on one stall for every 5
seats. (If one assumes the arena will utilize the parking north of Gala
Street for evening events, an additional 317 stalls could feasiblely be
added to serve the arena, providing a total of 595 stalls.)
2.6 Parking Lot Landscaping: Landscape islands serving a single row of
parking shall have one tree. Islands serving a double row of parking shall
have two trees. A minimum of one 3" caliper tree per 1500 square feet
of asphalt (including driveways connecting from the loop road) is
required per City Ordinance.
2.7 Streets and Circulation: A proposed stub road (Gala Street) to the east,
is unplatted property. Access shall be provided internally with a
connection between Sites "A" and "B". There is a conflict between the
Concept Plan and Plat for the Seminary site. The plat proposes a flag
lot for Lot 4, Block 1 (the proposed 19,648 s.f office building), with the
flag serving as the driveway. However, the Concept Plan shows the
seminary utilizing the flag driveway, not the office, and it shall be noted
for future cross access agreements.
2.8 Signage: The Applicant submitted a letter from Idaho Electric Signs
regarding signage for the apartment complex and a letter from Patrick
McKeegan outlining intent for the ice arena signage. The monument
signs shall not exceed 70 s.f. All signage throughout the PD -C shall be
coordinated and complement building materials and themes. This
applies to all future buildings.
2.9 Trash Enclosures: No trash enclosures are shown on the Conceptual
Site Plan. All such areas shall be situated outside of view from either
Overland or Locust Grove Roads. Applicant shall coordinate locations
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PAGE 6 OF 9
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT / OVERLAND 16, L.L.C. FOR PLANNED
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / CUP -00-017
and construction requirements of the required trash enclosures with
Meridian Sanitary Service, Inc., and provide a letter of approval from
their office when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance.
2.10 Hours of Operation: No details of hours of operation are provided. For
the future CUP applications, all office and retail uses shall be
harmonious with the apartment complex and residential homes to the
west.
2.11 Alternative Transportation Options: At build -out, this site would serve
as a principal center of employment for the east Meridian/west Boise
area. While Boise Urban Stages does not currently service Overland
Road, it has the potential to be a likely destination point for mass
transit in the future. An area shall be designated and/or preserved on
the Concept Plan for a future bus stop. The inclusion of bicycle racks
at all office and retail buildings and the ice hockey arena shall be
included.
2.12 All conditions placed on this application shall run with the land and
shall not lapse or be waived as the result of any change in tenancy or
ownership of any or all of the lands governed by this CUP application.
All such conditions shall be deemed the requirements for the issuance of
a Certificate of Occupancy for any use or structure as per City
Ordinance.
2.13 Applicant shall utilize the Ada County Highway District design
standards for the private street within this development, with the
exception of width requirements. Street designs shall be reviewed and
approved by the City of Meridian Public Works Department.
2.14 Developer shall, in any future development, insure that emergency
vehicular access through this property from Locust Grove Road to the
parcel lying to the east (RZ-00-003) shall be designed and built.
Additional Recommendations and/or comments from Meridian Fire Department,
Central District Health Department and Nampa &. Meridian Irrigation District are as
follows:
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PAGE 7 OF 9
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT / OVERLAND 16, L.L.C. FOR PLANNED
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / CUP -00-017
2.15 The Meridian Fire Department requires that the road and street
names and signs shall be installed before building is started.
2.16 The Central District Health Department requires that written
approval for the central sewage and central shall be submitted for
their approval. Additionally, plans for the central sewage and central
water shall be approved by the Idaho Department of Health SL
Welfare, Division of Environment Quality. Run-off is not to create a
mosquito breeding problem. That storm water be pre-treated
through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent
impact to ground water and surface water quality. Best management
practices for storm water disposal and design a storm water
management system that is preventing groundwater and surface
water degradation. Manuals for guidance are:
2.16.1 State of Idaho Catalog f Stormwater Best Management
Practices For Idaho Cities and Counties. Prepared by the
Idaho Division of Environment Quality, July 1997.
2.16.2 Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook.
Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department,
January 1997.
2.17 The Nampa Sz Meridian Irrigation District notes that the Hunter
Lateral courses along the west boundary of the proposed project.
The District reserves the right to claim what they deem necessary to
operate and maintain the Hunter Lateral. All storm drainage shall be
retained on site.
3. The above conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall
meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application for a conditional
use permit.
4. Notice to Permit Holder, this conditional use permit is not transferable
without complying with the provisions of Meridian City Code § 11-17-8, a copy of
which is attached to this permit.
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PAGE 8 OF 9
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT / OVERLAND 16, L.L.C. FOR PLANNED
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / CUP -00-017
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the C day of
2000.
. Corrie, Mayor City of Meridian
Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works
Department and City Attorney.
By. c
145� /c;�-F Dated
City Clerk
6-20 -o0
msg/Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\Resolution Business Park AZ RZ CUP PP\CUPOrder17
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PAGE 9 OF 9
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT / OVERLAND 16, L.L.C. FOR PLANNED
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / CUP -00-017
FILE COPY
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL
IN THE MATTER OF THE
REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED
COMMERCIAL
DEOVELOPMENT FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING
OF MULTI -FAMILY,
COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND
LDS SEMINARY, IN AN L -O
AND C -N ZONE LOCATED AT
SE CORNER OF OVERLAND
ROAD AND S LOCUST GROVE
ROAD, MERIDIAN, IDAHO
G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT /
OVERLAND 16, L.L.C.,
APPLICANT.
06-12-00
Case No. CUP -00-017
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND
DECISION AND ORDER
GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT
The above entitled conditional use permit application having come before
the City Council on June 6, 2000, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., at Meridian City Hall, 33 East
Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator,
appeared and testified, and appearing on behalf of the Applicant was Becky Bowcutt,
Briggs Engineering, Inc., and appearing and testifying with comments or concerns were:
Marion Burtell, Ted Sutherland, Bruce Waite, Dave Sheppard, John Shipley, Lacey White,
Norma Gale, and Michelle Barron, and the City Council having duly considered the
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/ OVERLAND 16, L..L.C.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / (CUP -00-017) - 1
12ez) l a h o o 1309 kl eY ktr-k,
r-.
evidence and the record in this matter and the Recommendations to City Council issued
by the Planning and Zoning Commission who conducted a public hearing and the Council
having heard and taken oral and written testimony, and having duly considered the
matter, the City Council hereby makes the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law
and Decision and Order to -wit:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. A notice of a public hearing on the conditional use permit was published for
two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for June 6, 2000,
before the City Council, the first publication appearing and written notice having been
mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the
external boundaries of the property under consideration more than fifteen (15) days prior
to said hearing and with the notice of public hearing having been posted upon the property
under consideration more than one week before said hearing and the copies of all notices
were made available to newspaper, radio and television stations as public service
announcements; and the matter having been duly considered by the City Council at the
June 6, 2000, public hearing; and the applicant, affected property owners, and government
subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian,
having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence.
2. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth
in Idaho Code §67-6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code §§ 11-15-5 and 11-17-5 as
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT / OVERLAND 16, L..L.C.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / (CUP -00-017) - 2
evidenced by the Affidavit of Mailing, and the Affidavit of Publication and Proof of
Posting filed with the staff report.
3. This proposed development request is in Ada County (R -T) and Meridian (R-
4), by reason of the provisions of the Meridian City Code § 11-17-4, a public hearing was
required before the City Council on this application.
4. The property is located at the SE corner of Overland Road and S. Locust
Grove Road, Meridian, Idaho.
5. The owner of record of the subject property is G.L. Voigt of Idaho Falls and
Overland 16, LLC of Boise.
6. Applicant is owner of record.
7. The subject property is currently zoned Ada County (R -T) and Meridian R-4.
There is a current application and recommendation before the Meridian City Council for
rezoning to L -O and C -N. The zoning district of L -O and C -N is defined within the City
of Meridian. Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-7-2.
8. The proposed application requests a conditional use permit for a commercial
development consisting of multi -family housing, commercial offices and an LDS Seminary.
The L -O and C -N zoning designations within the City of Meridian Zoning and
Development Ordinance require a conditional use permit be obtained for most uses
including those requested by the Applicant. (Meridian City Zoning and Development
Ordinance, Section 11-8-1) .
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/ OVERLAND 16, L..L.C.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / (CUP -00-017) - 3
9. The Meridian City Council recognizes that the proposed application is in
compliance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
10. The use proposed within the subject application will in fact, constitute a
conditional use as determined by City Ordinance.
11. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Zoning,
Subdivision and Development Ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City
Code and all current zoning maps thereof and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of
Meridian, and Maps and the Ordinance establishing the Impact Area Boundary.
12. Giving due consideration to the comment received from the governmental
subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction public
facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense
upon the public if the following conditions of development are imposed and the
following is also found to be required to mitigate the effects of the proposed use and
development upon services delivered by political subdivisions providing services to the
subject real property within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian:
Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering departments
as follows:
12.A This project is part of a multi -faceted requested development including
annexation, rezoning, preliminary plat and three (3) conditional use
permits and conditional recommendations contained in AZ -00-004, RZ-
00-003, PP -00-006, CUP -00-015, CUP -00-016 and CUP -00-017, will
apply where relevant.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT / OVERLAND 16, L..L.C.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / (CUP -00-017) - 4
Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as
follows:
12.1 This Conditional Use Permit is for the overall concept only. Future
phases of the project shall require separate Conditional Use Permits for
each phase and each must substantially comply with the final approved
Concept Plan.
12.2 Planned Development Regulations: As a mixed/planned use development,
the Resolution Plaza development must comply with the following
sections of the subdivision ordinance: 12-6-4 Procedures for Planned
Developments, 12-6-6 General Regulations for Planned Development,
and 12-6-7 General Standards for Planned Developments. In addition,
residential areas must comply with 12-6-8-A Design Standards for
Planned Development -Residential. All commercial and office uses must
comply with 12-6-8-B Design Standards for Planned Development -
Commercial.
12.3 Colored Rendering: Colored renderings of the development must be
submitted prior to the City Council meeting to meet the intent of Section
12-6-4 of the PD ordinance.
12.4 Open Space: All Planned Developments (PD) are required to have at least
10% of the gross land area of the PD as common open space as 12-6-7-E-
5. The total common open space calculation for Resolution Plaza is
shown separately on Sheets 1-3 (Sites "A" - "C"). Site "A" is 4.53 acres
(1.44 required), Site "B" is 5.29 acres (1.45 required), and Site "C" is
4.10 acres (1.86 required). These calculations include landscape buffers
and islands. Standard practice has been that residential PD's cannot
count required buffers and landscape setbacks toward the 10% open
space requirement, but commercial PD's have been allowed to count it.
Total gross site acreage for the Resolution Plaza project is 47.04 acres
(excluding public rights-of-way). 10% open space would be 4.7 acres. The
minimum amount of open space has been met. All open space delineated
as common open space must meet all standards of 12-6-7-E.
12.5 Parking: The matrix below summarizes the total off-street parking counts
. for the conceptual PD -C:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/ OVERLAND 16, L..L.C.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / (CUP -00-017) - 5
Site/Use
Parking Proposed
Parking Required
Site "A"
- Retail pads N of first driveway (3)
257
250
- Retail & office pads b/w driveways (2)
183
181
- Office & day care pads S of second
driveway
189
100 (est.)
Site "A" Total
629
531
Site "B" (Apartment Complex)
553*
460 (2.3/d.u)
Site "C"
- Retail & office pads on Y2K Lane (2)
156
151
- LDS Seminary
17
20 (est.)
- Office buildings S of Gala St. (2)
129
98
- Retail & office buildings N of Gala St. (2)
317
287
- Ice Arena
278
286(l seats
The Applicant is proposing 152 tandem parking spaces for the complex.
The P&Z Commission discouraged tandem parking for a proposed
apartment complex of similar size in October 1999 (Valerie Heights). If
the tandem parking is subtracted from the total parking spaces,
their total provided would be 401 spaces, and the parking shall be
limited to the 401 parking spaces for this ,project.
On the Site "A" plan, a row of parking is proposed along the south edge
of the north driveway and along both the north and south edges of the
south driveway with no separation. The likelihood of these private
driveways receiving high volumes of traffic at build -out (functioning more
as public roads), would be unsafe and shall be relocated. The first parking
stalls are less than 40 feet from the property line and vehicles backing out
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT / OVERLAND 16, L..L.C.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / (CUP -00-017) - 6
of the stalls into the drive aisle would likely be a hazard for vehicles
entering the site off Locust Grove.
The proposed Ice Arena seats a total of 1,430 people. Technically, the
Applicant meets City ordinance, which is based on one stall for every 5
seats. (If one assumes the arena will utilize the parking north of Gala
Street for evening events, an additional 317 stalls could feasiblely be
added to serve the arena, providing a total of 595 stalls.)
12.6 Parking Lot Landscaping: Landscape islands serving a single row of
parking shall have one tree. Islands serving a double row of parking shall
have two trees. A minimum of one 3" caliper tree per 1500 square feet of
asphalt (including driveways connecting from the loop road) is required
per City Ordinance.
12.7 Streets and Circulation: A proposed stub road (Gala Street) to the east, is
unplatted property. Access shall be provided internally with a connection
between Sites "A" and "B". There is a conflict between the Concept Plan
and Plat for the Seminary site. The plat proposes a flag lot for Lot 4,
Block 1 (the proposed 19,648 s.f office building), with the flag serving as
the driveway. However, the Concept Plan shows the seminary utilizing
the flag driveway, not the office, and it shall be noted for future cross
access agreements.
12.8 Signage: The Applicant submitted a letter from Idaho Electric Signs
regarding signage for the apartment complex and a letter from Patrick
McKeegan outlining intent for the ice arena signage. The monument
signs shall not exceed 70 s.f. All signage throughout the PD -C shall be
coordinated and complement building materials and themes. This applies
to all future buildings.
12.9 Trash Enclosures: No trash enclosures are shown on the Conceptual Site
Plan. All such areas shall be situated outside of view from either Overland
or Locust Grove Roads. Applicant shall coordinate locations and
construction requirements of the required trash enclosures with Meridian
Sanitary Service, Inc., and provide a letter of approval from their office
when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance.
12.10 Hours of Operation: No details of hours of operation are provided. For
the future CUP applications, all office and retail uses shall be harmonious
with the apartment complex and residential homes to the west.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/ OVERLAND 16, L..L.C.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / (CUP -00-017) - 7
i
12.11 Alternative Transportation Options: At build -out, this site would serve as
a principal center of employment for the east Meridian/west Boise area.
While Boise Urban Stages does not currently service Overland Road, it
has the potential to be a likely destination point for mass transit in the
future. An area shall be designated and/or preserved on the Concept Plan
for a future bus stop. The inclusion of bicycle racks at all office and retail
buildings and the ice hockey arena shall be included.
12.12 All conditions placed on this application shall run with the land and shall
not lapse or be waived as the result of any change in tenancy or
ownership of any or all of the lands governed by this CUP application. All
such conditions shall be deemed the requirements for the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for any use or structure as per City Ordinance.
12.13 Applicant shall utilize the Ada County Highway District design standards
for the private street within this development, with the exception of
width requirements. Street designs shall be reviewed and approved by the
City of Meridian Public Works Department.
12.14 Developer shall, in any future development, insure that emergency
vehicular access through this property from Locust Grove Road to the
parcel lying to the east (RZ-00-003) shall be designed and built.
Additional Recommendations and/or comments from Meridian Fire Department,
Central District Health Department and Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District are as
follows:
12.15 The Meridian Fire Department requires that the road and street names
and signs shall be installed before building is started.
12.16 The Central District Health Department requires that written approval
for the central sewage and central shall be submitted for their approval.
Additionally, plans for the central sewage and central water shall be
approved by the Idaho Department of Health &_ Welfare, Division of
Environment Quality. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding
problem. That storm water be pre-treated through a grassy swale prior to
discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to ground water and surface
water quality. Best management practices for storm water disposal and
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/ OVERLAND 16, L..L.C.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / (CUP -00-017) - 8
design a storm water management system that is preventing groundwater
and surface water degradation. Manuals for guidance are:
12.16.1 State of Idaho Catalog f Stormwater Best Management Practices
For Idaho Cities and Counties. Prepared by the Idaho Division
of Environment Quality, July 1997.
12.16.2 Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook. Prepared by
City of Boise Public Works Department, January 1997.
12.17 The Nampa SL Meridian Irrigation District notes that the Hunter Lateral
courses along the west boundary of the proposed project. The District
reserves the right to claim what they deem necessary to operate and
maintain the Hunter Lateral. All storm drainage shall be retained on site.
13. The proposed uses within the subject application will be harmonious
with and in accordance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and the City of
Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance because:
13.1 The subject property is designated on the "Generalized Land Use Map" as
"Commercial".
14. The uses proposed within the subject application subject to the
conditions herein ordered will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be
harmonious and appropriate in appearance or intended character of the general vicinity
and that such uses will not change the intended essential character of the same area.
15. The uses proposed within the subject application will not be hazardous
or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/ OVERLAND 16, L..L.C.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / (CUP -00-017) - 9
t
16. The uses proposed within the subject application will be served
adequately by central public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and
fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer.
17. The uses proposed within the subject application will not involve uses,
activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be
detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive
production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors.
18. The development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of
natural or scenic feature of major importance relating to the property.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the
"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975" hereinafter referred to for convenience as the
"Act" codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503).
2. The Meridian City Council may exercise all the powers required and
authorized under the "Act" except the power to adopt ordinances by the establishment
of a Planning and Zoning Commission by ordinance pursuant to Idaho Code Section
67-6504 which the City Council of the City of Meridian has established by the passage
of the "City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance" at Titles XI and XII,
Chapter I, Meridian City Code.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/ OVERLAND 16, L..L.C.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / (CUP -00-017) - 10
3. As part of a zoning ordinance the City Council can, subject to hearing
and notice provision required, provide for the process of special and/or conditional use
permits which a proposed use is otherwise prohibited by the terms of the ordinance but
allowed with conditions under the specific provisions of the ordinance which the City
of Meridian has done in the adoption of its zoning ordinances.
4. The City Council has the duty and responsibility to review the facts and
circumstances of each application for special use permit to determine prior to granting
the same that the evidential showing supports the finding that the following standards
are met and that the proposed development: (Meridian City Code § 11-17-3 )
a. Will, in fact, constitute a conditional use as determined by City policy;
b. Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive
Plan and this Ordinance;
C. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be
harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of
the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the
same area;
d. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring
uses;
e. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such
as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal,
water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed
conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services;
f. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the
community;
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/ OVERLAND 16, L..L.C.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / (CUP -00-017) - 11
F
g. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and
conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general
welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
h.
Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic
feature of major importance.
5. Prior to granting a conditional use permit in a Limited Office District (L-
O) and Neighborhood Business District (C -N), a public hearing shall be conducted
with notice to be published and provided to property owners or purchasers of record
within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the land under
consideration for the conditional use permit all in accordance with the provisions of
Meridian City Code § 11-17-5 City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance,
which provides as follows:
"Prior to approving a Conditional Use Permit, the applicant and the
Commission and Council shall follow notice and hearing procedures provided in
Chapter 15 of this Title. Provided, however, that conditional use applications
for land in Old Town and in industrial and commercial districts shall only be
required to have one public hearing which shall be held before the Planning and
Zoning Commission; and after the recommendation of the Commission is
made, the application shall go before the City Council without a public hearing
and the Council may approve, deny, or modify the recommendation of the
Commission."
6. Following the public hearing and within 45 days after the conclusion of
the public Bearing the Commission shall, transmit its recommendations to the
Meridian City Council with supportive reasons. The Commission shall recommend
that the application be approved, approved with conditions or denied. The
Commission shall ensure that any approval or approval with conditions of an
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT / OVERLAND 16, L..L.C.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / (CUP -00-017) - 12
f
f
application shall be in accordance with Meridian Comprehensive Plan, City of
Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, and Idaho State law. (Meridian City
Code § 11-17-6)
7. When the City Council approves a conditional use permit it may impose
conditions of that approval that reasonably:
A. Minimize adverse impact on other development;
B. Control the sequence and timing of development;
C. I Control the duration of development;
D. Assure that the development is maintained property;
E. Designate the exact location and nature of the development;
F. Require the provision for on-site public facilities or services; and
G. Require more restrictive standards than those generally required, in this
Ordinance.
8. ' The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and
the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 21,
1993, Ord. 629, January 4, 1994 and Maps.
DECISION AND ORDER
GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING FINDINGS
OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does hereby ORDER
and this does Order that:
1. That the above named applicant is granted a conditional use permit for a
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT / OVERLAND 16, L..L.C.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / (CUP -00-017) - 13
0.
commercial development consisting of multi -family housing, commercial offices and an
LDS Seminary, subject to the following conditions of use and development:
1.A This project is part of a multi -faceted requested development including
annexation, rezoning, preliminary plat and three (3) conditional use
permits and conditional recommendations contained in AZ -00-004, RZ-
00-003, PP -00-006, CUP -00-015, CUP -00-016 and CUP -00-017, will
apply where relevant.
Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as
follows:
1.1 This Conditional Use Permit is for the overall concept only. Future
phases of the project shall require separate Conditional Use Permits for
each phase and each must substantially comply with the final approved
Concept Plan.
1.2 Planned Development Regulations: As a mixed/planned use development,
the Resolution Plaza development must comply with the following
sections of the subdivision ordinance: 12-6-4 Procedures for Planned
Developments, 12-6-6 General Regulations for Planned Development,
and 12-6-7 General Standards for Planned Developments. In addition,
residential areas must comply with 12-6-8-A Design Standards for
Planned Development -Residential. All commercial and office uses must
comply with 12-6-8-B Design Standards for Planned Development -
Commercial.
1.3 Colored Rendering: Colored renderings of the development must be
submitted prior to the City Council meeting to meet the intent of Section
12-6-4 of the PD ordinance.
1.4 Open Space: All Planned Developments (PD) are required to have at least
10% of the gross land area of the PD as common open space as 12-6-7-E-
5. The total common open space calculation for Resolution Plaza is
shown separately on Sheets 1-3 (Sites "A" - "C"). Site "A" is 4.53 acres
(1.44 required), Site "B" is 5.29 acres (1.45 required), and Site "C" is
4.10 acres (1.86 required). These calculations include landscape buffers
and islands. Standard practice has been that residential PD's cannot
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/ OVERLAND 16, L..L.C.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / (CUP -00-017) - 14
f. r
se
rM
count required buffers and landscape setbacks toward the 10% open
space requirement, but commercial PD's have been allowed to count it.
Total gross site acreage for the Resolution Plaza project is 47.04 acres
(excluding public rights-of-way). 10% open space would be 4.7 acres. The
minimum amount of open space has been met. All open space delineated
as common open space must meet all standards of 12-6-7-E.
1.5 Parking: The matrix below summarizes the total off-street parking counts
for the conceptual PD -C:
stalls are less than 40 feet from the property line and vehicles backing out
of the stalls into the drive aisle would likely be a hazard for vehicles
entering the site off Locust Grove.
The proposed Ice Arena seats a total of 1,430 people. Technically, the
Applicant meets City ordinance, which is based on one stall for every 5
seats. (If one assumes the arena will utilize the parking north of Gala
Street for evening events, an additional 317 stalls could feasiblely be
added to serve the arena, providing a total of 595 stalls.)
1.6 Parking Lot Landscaping: Landscape islands serving a single row of
parking shall have one tree. Islands serving a double row of parking shall
have two trees. A minimum of one 3" caliper tree per 1500 square feet of
asphalt (including driveways connecting from the loop road) is required
per City Ordinance.
1.7 Streets and Circulation: A proposed stub road (Gala Street) to the east, is
unplatted property. Access shall be provided internally with a connection
between Sites "A" and "B". There is a conflict between the Concept Plan
and Plat for the Seminary site. The plat proposes a flag lot for Lot 4,
Block 1 (the proposed 19,648 s.f office building), with the flag serving as
the driveway. However, the Concept Plan shows the seminary utilizing
the flag driveway, not the office, and it shall be noted for future cross
access agreements.
1.8 Signage: The Applicant submitted a letter from Idaho Electric Signs
regarding signage for the apartment complex and a letter from Patrick
McKeegan outlining intent for the ice arena signage. The monument
signs shall not exceed 70 s.f. All signage throughout the PD -C shall be
coordinated and complement building materials and themes. This applies
to all future buildings.
1.9 Trash Enclosures: No trash enclosures are shown on the Conceptual Site
Plan. All such areas shall be situated outside of view from either Overland
or Locust Grove Roads. Applicant shall coordinate locations and
construction requirements of the required trash enclosures with Meridian
Sanitary Service, Inc., and provide a letter of approval from their office
when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/ OVERLAND 16, L.1. C.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / (CUP -00-017) - 17
r
1. 10 Hours of Operation: No details of hours of operation are provided. For
the future CUP applications, all office and retail uses shall be harmonious
with the apartment complex and residential homes to the west.
1.11 Alternative Transportation Options: At build -out, this site would serve as
a principal center of employment for the east Meridian/west Boise area.
While Boise Urban Stages does not currently service Overland Road, it
has the potential to be a likely destination point for mass transit in the
future. An area shall be designated and/or preserved on the Concept Plan
for a future bus stop. The inclusion of bicycle racks at all office and retail
buildings and the ice hockey arena shall be included.
1.12 All conditions placed on this application shall run with the land and shall
not lapse or be waived as the result of any change in tenancy or
ownership of any or all of the lands governed by this CUP application. All
such conditions shall be deemed the requirements for the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for any use or structure as per City Ordinance.
1.13 Applicant shall utilize the Ada County Highway District design standards
for the private street within this development, with the exception of
width requirements. Street designs shall be reviewed and approved by the
City of Meridian Public Works Department.
1.14 Developer shall, in any future development, insure that emergency
vehicular access through this property from Locust Grove Road to the
parcel lying to the east (RZ-00-003) shall be designed and built.
Additional Recommendations and/or comments from Meridian Fire Department,
Central District Health Department and Nampa S& Meridian Irrigation District are as
follows:
12.15 The Meridian Fire Department requires that the road and street names
and signs shall be installed before building is started.
12.16 The Central District Health Department requires that written approval
for the central sewage and central shall be submitted for their approval.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT / OVERLAND 16, L..L.C.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / (CUP -00-017) - 18
Additionally, plans for the central sewage and central water shall be
approved by the Idaho Department of Health S& Welfare, Division of
Environment Quality. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding
problem. That storm water be pre-treated through a grassy swale prior to
discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to ground water and surface
water quality. Best management practices for storm water disposal and
design a storm water management system that is preventing groundwater
and surface water degradation. Manuals for guidance are:
12.16.1 State of Idaho Catalog f Stormwater Best Management
Practices For Idaho Cities and Counties. Prepared by the
Idaho Division of Environment Quality, July 1997.
12.16.2 Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook.
Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department,
January 1997.
12.17 The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District notes that the Hunter Lateral
courses along the west boundary of the proposed project. The District
reserves the right to claim what they deem necessary to operate and
maintain the Hunter Lateral. All storm drainage shall be retained on site.
2. The conditions shall be reviewable by the Council pursuant to Meridian
City Code § 11-17-9.
3. The above conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant
shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application for a
conditional use, permit.
4. That the City Attorney draft an Order Granting Conditional Use Permit
in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk
and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Planning and Zoning
Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT / OVERLAND 16, L..L.C.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / (CUP -00-017) - 19
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City
of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person being a person
who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance
or denial of the conditional use permit may within twenty-eight (28) days after the
date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title
67, Idaho Code.
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the
day of STt"-' - , 2000.
ROLL CALL:
COUNCILMAN RON ANDERSON VOTED_A—
COUNCILPERSON KEITH BIRD VOTED_��
COUNCILMAN TAMMY deWEERD VOTED
COUNCILMAN CHERIE McCANDLESS VOTED—Y�—
MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) VOTED
DATED: z Z
MOTION:
APPROVED _ DISAPPROVED:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/ OVERLAND 16, L..L.C.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / (CUP -00-017) - 20
Copy served upon Applicant, Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works
Department and the City Attorney.
By' • Dated: 6—zw'—&1)o
City Clerk
msg/ZAWorkVVWeridian 15360M\Resolution Business Park AZ RZ CUP PP\CUPFindings 17
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION
AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/ OVERLAND 16, L..L.C.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT / (CUP -00-017) - 21
k
June 2, 2000 CUP 00-017
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 6, 2000
APPLICANT G.L. Voigt / Overland, LLC ITEM NO. I I
REQUEST CUP for proposed Resolution Business Park for a planned commercial
development consisting of multi -family, commercial, office and LDS seminary in a
proposed L -O and C -G zone - south of Overland Road & east of Locust Grove Road
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
COMMENTS
See attached PZ minutes
See attached memo
See attached recommendations
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
�qq -qlov �a,4" COOL (-Yv �vy-, W
k,
MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING --MAY 9 2000
The regular scheduled meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission was
call to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Keith Borup.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Keith Borup, Sally Norton, Kent Brown, Tom Barbeiro, Richard
Hatcher.
OTHERS PRESENT: David Swartley, Bruce Freckleton, Brad Hawkins Clark, Will Berg.
Borup: We'd like to call to order our meeting this evening. This is a regular scheduled
meeting for Planning and Zoning Commission. I'd like to go through attendance of the
Commissioner's. First item on the agenda is the Consent Agenda. I would entertain a
motion for approval of the Consent Agenda.
Brown: Mr. Chairman I would move approval of the Consent Agenda, Items A,B and C,
minutes from the March 22nd, April 3rd and April 11th meetings.
Hatcher: I second the motion.
Borup: All in favor.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Brown: I would like to be excused for the first 7 items.
Borup: Okay. Have fun. Item number 1 and 2 were tabled. I believe we tabled those
items wanting to finalize Items 3 through 6. Would we like to skip to Items 3 through 6
and come back or would the Commissioner's like to open and vote on 1 and 2 right now.
3. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF
17 LOTS ON 107.06 ACRES IN PROPOSED L-0 AND C -G ZONES FOR
PROPOSED RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK BY G.L. VOIGT
DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC—OVERLAND AND LOCUST GROVE
ROADS:
Borup: Does staff have any additional comments to make on this. It was continued for
the ACHD report. We had the draft report a while back. We have the final report now.
Is the applicant here and like to come forward. Do any of the Commissioner's have
anything additional they'd like to ask the applicant, other than the ACHD report.
Bowcutt: These items were deferred because we were awaiting Ada County Highway
District Staff Report as you recall at our public hearing a month or so ago. We had not
even received a draft. The staff, I think they went through about 3 versions of the draft
and it did go to the highway district Commissioner's last Wednesday at their noon
meeting for discussion. To bring you up to date the Commissioner's did recommend
Meridian Planning ano�oning Commission
May 9, 2000
Page 2
approval of all the projects involved. They instructed their staff to get with us and the
City of Meridian and the school district and see what can be done to exhilarate the
upgrade of Overland Road between Locust Grove and Eagle Road. At this point of
time, it is on their 2004 plan. They realize that they could have an operational high
school as early as 2002. That did concern them. They have also required multiple
improvements of my client, which includes constructing a Td lane from the east end of
our property up to the intersection of Locust Grove and then south on Locust Grove to
our southerly boundary. On of the comments that was made by the Commission, that
type of improvement can run anywhere from $125 to $175 thousand dollars. If we go in
and we construct that 3rd lane and then they come in 6, 12, 18 months later and tear it
all out to build their five lane, it makes more sense that we exhilarate the 5 lane and put
those monies to use building or helping to construct the 5 lane. Therefore, it would save
some public funds. The things that I want to bring to your attention that they placed
upon this project, they have asked us to contribute 25% of a signal at the intersection of
Locust Grove and Overland. The intersection operates at a level of service A at this
time, however, the left hand turn lane operates at a level of service F. According to
ACHD's traffic counts the counts at this time do not warrant signalization. In the future
they realize they will need a signal there. They understand that the retail that we
propose at that corner is down the road is not one of the first 3 or 4 phases that is going
to be further down the road then that. Probably co-insiding with some type of a Locust
Grove overpass. They accept the fact that a light is necessary, but state they will
construct that light when it is warranted. Secondly, they have asked us to contribute
$112,500 which would be 75% of the light at our new Millenium Way Overland
intersection which is the collector roadway for the high school. That 75% does include
the high school or the school district share. My conversations with the school district,
they have indicated that they will pay whatever proportionate share the highway district
deems is attributed to their traffic volume. There is approximately 5000 trips a day
through Millenium Way. Of those 5,000, 3,000 will be from going to and from the high
school site. They've asked us to contribute $52,800 dollars to a trust fund for sidewalk
along Overland Road. We asked them to allow us to construct the sidewalk versus trust
funding for it. The policy of the City of Meridian is they would like to see those
sidewalks go in as soon as possible. Their concern was if we placed the sidewalk in at
the edge of the new right of way that it could be torn out when the road is rebuilt. Our
suggestion was we'll take the sidewalk and meander within our 30 foot landscaped
area. Therefore, we will be outside the right of way and would not require any
modification. The Commission seemed to believe that's a viable option. They asked
staff to get with us and discuss it. We will be building decel lanes at the intersection.
They ok'ed all of our approaches on Overland Road. They asked us to upgrade our
collector. We shoed a 41 foot collector roadway section for Millenium Way. They
indicated they'd like that to be 46 foot section. My client agreed to that. They asked us
to provide adequate stacking room for any of the approaches as they intercept with
Millenium Way. The only major revision was on Locust Grove. We have this approach
right here. They have asked us to move this to offset it from this roadway here to
Meridian Planning an0--Zoning Commission �.
May 9, 2000
Page 3
increase that distance of offset. We will shift this building this direction and then shift
this to the south and then put parking in there. Our offsets from all of the major
intersections for the signal will be installed in the future are acceptable. This was the
only thing of significance. This is a multi phased project and the highway district
commission liked this—the idea of a long term project. The first phase will be the ice
hockey facility. The second phase would consist of 140 units of the total 200
apartments, 2001. The seminary will go in whatever time the high school goes in. All of
this is down the road. Your staff placed a limitation on the conditional use permit for the
apartments -40 units in the first phase. I brought that up with Ada County Highway
District and they said that doesn't make any sense. That is one of the lowest traffic
generators on the site. Also, you can't afford to pay all of these trust funds and make
all the improvements if you can't begin the projects. 40 units is not acceptable. My
clients indicate they can not function with 40 units. Ada County Highway District did
look at impact fees generated by this project. The school district is exempt from impact
fees but all of the uses on the property would be subject. The multi family project would
pay $160,000 in impact fees. The retail space would generate over one million dollars.
That brings you up to date.
Barbeiro: Becky is Millenium Drive to be placed as part of the first phase.
Bowcutt: Yes sir. The first phase we are constructing all of the public roadway
systems. We'll built Millenium Way and put all the sewer, water, 3 phase power and
then build this public street here, the rotary and this public street here. We have all
ready designed all of those roadways.
Barbeiro: Can you remind me of what kind of meetings you've had with the school
district in regards to Millenium Drive, the students that will use that and the roadway
being the primary road for all of the construction at the high school.
Bowcutt: They will be coming up and down that roadway. It will have to be there before
they can pull their permit. The highway district has indicated they want to focus all of
the high school traffic where that signal is going to be constructed.
Barbeiro: As I recall, the conditional use permit for the high school won't be available
until the signal is operational.
Bowcutt: According to your planning staff the higih school does not require a conditional
use permit in their R-4 zone. They will just be submitting for building permit. That is
why the highway district imposed the 75% of that light—the $112,000 because they
would not see that school application come through. All of my users will be conditional
use applications. That was the other thing that they liked.
Norton: According to the Ada County Highway District we received the draft report and
then the final report sometime today. The difference between the two is that instead of
Meridian Planning an;1,7oning Commission
May 9, 2000
Page 4
paying the $52,000 for the sidewalk on Overland, you will put in the sidewalk in your
landscape area. Is that correct?
Bowcutt: That's what we requested.
Norton: You started to talk about not doing the center lane improvement on Overland in
order for Overland to be widened to 5 lanes earlier. Would you go through what you
said on that.
Bowcutt: In the staff report approved by the Commission it mandates that we construct
a 3rd center turn lane for the entire length of our property. It would be from our
perimeter to the intersection and then down to our southern boundary here. Three
lane on Overland and Locust Grove.
Norton: How close is your far east property to Eagle Road?
Bowcutt: This is one half mile. In our staff report we are required to construct that. The
issue we brought up with the commission is we would like to see the improvements
accelerated. We don't want to see the third lane wasted. The elevations will all change.
Norton: Did you get any idea how far up the priority list it was going to be moved?
Bowcutt: The staff and I had at least four discussions. They indicated that their
superiors would not make a decision. We would have to take our plea to the
commission and that is what we did. They instructed their staff, you need to figure out a
solution and now. With that school coming in 2002, 1 would anticipate them trying to
accelerate it two years—If I had to guess.
Norton: Are you under the understanding that that road will be five lanes by the time
school goes in 2002.
Bowcutt: That is what I hope and I think the commission wants their staff to figure out
how to do that.
Borup: At this point, something could be worked out that's the way to go. If it can't be
worked out then the 3 lanes are going in.
Bowcutt: We will end up building the third lane. Those requirements are set down.
I did forget to mention, they are going to add additional turn lanes at the Eagle Road
Overland intersection and that work should begin in a few months and they indicated
they are going to get started on the Meridian Road Overland intersection for that
improvement.
Borup: Before we proceed I'd like a show of hands how many people are here to testify
on this application. We have received public testimony over the last three months so
Meridian Planning an¢..Zoning Commission
May 9, 2000
Page 5
what we'd be open for is anything pertaining to the ACHD report we will be glad to take
any testimony on.
Bertell: Steve Bertell. I live at 2535 S. Velvet Falls Way. Mr. chairman and members of
the commission, at this time I would like to present to the board a total of 725 signatures
from residents from all the impacted Subdivisions, all respectfully asking the
commission to at least delay the approval of this development until such a time as
Overland and Locust Grove Roads are widened. Those who have signed the petitions
are frustrated over having to drive in all ready heavily trafficked roadway on a daily
basis. We agree with the ACHD impact analysis statement that the findings of the
development would only intensify the all ready major traffic problems in this area. In
fact, I parked at the intersection of Overland and Locust Grove the afternoon of March
23rd from 3 PM until 6 PM and I counted 3137 vehicles using that intersection, either
crossing or turning from one street to another. This coincides with the ACHD report
findings of approximately 11,422 vehicles using Overland Road on a daily basis. This is
existing traffic. Also, during that 3 hour period, I witnessed one rear ender accident, one
near accident and my wife and I came upon another accident on Overland Road on
April 10th at 5:50 PM. The traffic on these roads will easily double if not triple as a result
of this development. The Ada County Highway District has no plans to widen Overland
until 2004 since it is in their 5 year plan. No plans to widen Locust Grove south of
Overland until sometime outside the 2005 year plan. No plans to install a traffic light
there until it is warranted. I don't know what the definition of warranted is. The
developer stated they wanted to start the major ice hockey and sports arena this year
pending bond approval. The high school could open as early as fall 2002. Don't
misunderstand us. We are not opposed to this development, but what we are saying is
that we are requesting that Overland and Locust Grove be widened to accommodate
the dramatic traffic increase that this proposal would create. If there is a traffic mishap
on the freeway, Overland Road immediately backs up. If emergency vehicle needed to
get to one of our Subdivisions, it would be difficult at best for that vehicle to get through.
Let's not make Overland and Locust Grove roads another fiasco like the Curtis Road
extension was. At least consider the opinions of the 725 residents as well as all of us
who live in the 6 impacted Subdivisions.
Borup: You feel that the road would be improved on a faster time frame without the
million dollars that this project would contribute toward the roads.
Bertell: I am a lay man and don't know where the money would come from. We are
concerned about—
Borup: We are lay men too (Inaudible) and it is not going to come from anywhere other
than this type of thing. So, the fastest way to get Overland approved, is to get the
money. Since this has been carrying on for several months, we had quite a number of
staff recommendations on this project. Do we need a refresher on that. We know
staffs recommendation is. I am thinking I mean the applicant either agrees with them or
—she mentioned one in her report, so I think I'd like to get Becky back up. You had
Meridian Planning an�L.Zoning Commission
May 9, 2000
Page 6
mentioned one item as far as staff recommendation on number of apartment units.
We've got your response to all of staff comments. That was the only one that stuck out.
Were there any others? That was under the CUP, Item number 2 on your response.
Bowcutt: The annexation and zoning application, we were in agreement. preliminary
plat, I highlighted item 8. The applicant intends to provide landscape easements along
Locust Grove and Overland Roads. An association will be formed to govern perimeter
landscaping. We ask that that be an easement. I believe that staff had a discussion
about it being a separate lot.
Borup: Staff's concern was who will maintain it.
Bowcutt: At a minimum the landscape buffer shall be placed within a permanent
landscape easement designated such on the plat. We would like that to be designated
as an easement on the plat and provide an association for maintenance. Item 8,
preliminary plat requirements. Item 10, we agreed to pipe the Hunter Lateral as
requested by staff. We ask that we be allowed to provide a western fence along the
western side of the apartments. Staff made a statement they prefer that it be unfenced
if we pipe the lateral. Clarification on Item 13. We have a little access road. It was not
intended to be a private drive. It is an access way providing joint access to those
buildings. We just want to clarify that our intention was not to construct curb gutter or
sidewalk there because it is an alley access. Under the PUD, I highlighted Item 4. We
did not provide any RV storage, parking areas for the multi family. Those uses will be
prohibited. Only personal cars will be allowed. We do not propose a maintenance
building at this site. All maintenance will be contracted out with a maintenance
company. We disagreed on Item 7 concerning the parking requirements. Staff asked
for 2.3 spaces per dwelling unit. The ordinance mandates 2. 1 know of no multi family
application where staff imposed 2.3. 1 went to another complex that has garages called
the Renascence next to Chinden and Eagle Road. We did that civil engineering for that
site. That one has garages and I noticed that people who have two cars but have a
single garage, their spouse parked in front of the garage. I think what staffs intention
for additional parking was for guests or something like that. Our contention is, it is not
necessary with our type of design we have more than what we would ever need in
parking. For the Ice Rink, I think there was a difference of eight spaces. Mr. McKeegan
got up to discuss that stating that we have substantial amount of overflow parking to the
north and there will be very few events where you would find that all parking spaces
would be completely utilized. His contention was that adequate parking was provided.
Obviously we were opposed to the limitation—it was the limitation of 30 units in the first
phase of the apartments. We had asked for the first phase to consist of 140. For the
record and for those people in the audience that were not here at the last hearing, we
are asking for conceptual approval of this planned unit development, but we are only
asking for site specific approval for the ice arena and the 200 unit apartments. All the
other users with the exception of the high school will have to come back before the
Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. All surrounding properties
within 300 feet will be notified. Legal notice will be put in the paper. Each user will have
Meridian Planning an¢Zoning Commission —,
May 9, 2000
Page 7
to come back before this body and go through this process again. That is one factor
that should be taken into consideration as far as what improvements are done out on
these roadway systems when the timing of these lights and so forth. If a user comes in
say a year and a half from now, and he will generate a substantial amount of traffic, at
that point of time if those improvements aren't out there to support that development, I
would anticipate commission having a difficult time of proving it. We've got to start
somewhere and we've got to get that collector roadway and this other network of
roadways and utilities to provide access to the high school. The only way we can afford
to do it is to take these first couple phases and move forward.
Borup: Thank you. Any questions from the commission?
Barbeiro: We can ask staff questions as a whole or individually. The one that catches
my eye right now is the storage areas because that is a city ordinance. Other then that,
if you wanted to go down the line with some of the things that Becky disagreed with.
Hawkins Clark: Commissioner Barbeiro, members of the Commission the ordinance
requirement for storage areas has typically been something that if the developer makes
a commitment we have waived at this level. It is not necessarily required a variance. It
really particularly when garages are provided. It is something we look favorable at.
Borup: At this particular site there is a proposed mini storage unit down the street.
Barbeiro: How about the maintenance building.
Hawkins Clark: 1 think when the covenants, correct me Becky if they are not, but
typically we —they are going to contract out. That is not ordinance required. I think it is
a recommendation. We are fine with that. On the parking issue mainly we were
pointing out that the fact that on Valeri Heights no tandem parking was allowed. If your
going to allow it here, we just mainly wanted to raise the attention. We certainly aren't
looking for more asphalt. I think we concur with the 460 number for required parking.
The cross access issue was important. Obviously we'd ask for a revised preliminary
plat that shows that, that shows the new Locust Grove Driveways to be submitted for
the City Council—prior to the City Council so we can review the revised preliminary plat
that reflects these changes.
Barbeiro: Becky, in our last meeting, you did tell us that you were going to have a cross
access over the Hunter Lateral, is that correct.
Bowcutt: Yes, I think our sketched out we were going to make an inter connection
between those two buildings and just north of the daycare facility into that little rotary.
We make on making that revision and getting that to staff prior to the City Council.
Meridian Planning anPL-Zoning Commission r-•
May 9, 2000
Page 8
Barbeiro: Brad the recommendation regarding landscape buffers. 25 versus 30 and
staff would prefer to have a separate lot where the developer would prefer to have an
easement. Comment on that please.
Hawkins Clark: This issue comes up frequently. It is mainly our concern is the
consistency of appearance for principle arterials like what Overland is going to be. I
think in this case with the easement going to be maintained the full buffer distance by a
single entity, that's fine. Our main issue is when you have single, multiple single lots
that all have a easement, each of them can take care of that landscape however they
want.
Barbeiro: Becky, the property will remain under one ownership, is that correct.
Bowcutt: No sir. When you plat it then it would be eligible to sell off the lots to separate
owners. What we propose to do is place landscape easements on the plat and then we
will have to have covenants, obviously governing the uses on these lots and so forth.
On these covenants it would stipulate like lot owner dues. They would not be
homeowners association dues, but lot owner dues which would provide for the
maintenance of all of the landscaping. It is all maintained the same. We are going to
provide a landscape plan so all of it would be the same. You would not end up with a
hodge podge. That is not our intention.
Barbeiro: Your new plan will account for 7 handicapped spots at the arena.
Bowcutt: Yes sir. Mr. McKeegan when on the record last time that they would add
those.
Barbeiro: Brad, when we talked about the 30 dwelling units for the apartments, Becky's
note was that ACHD thought that the apartments would be one of the lower traffic count
generators. Can you comment on that.
Hawkins Clark: It was a bad day. Staff has re -thought that. Those are national
transportation engineer figures that seem to have been accounted for. This is the only -
there are only two projects that are coming in right now and certainly when you look at
traffic generation you can't really take into account projects that aren't before this
commission. Your really only have two projects that are before you and to put some
controls on—your certainly not going to put a control on the ice arena. They are going
to have events and that will draw -1 think the apartment complexes—we did talk about if
they are doing the 140 previously they had outlined a phase one which was more or
less the northwest portion of their site B there and it didn't provide for any vehicular
access out of that phase one out onto Millenium Way. Every one of those 140 was
funneling out through the driveway onto Overland at the west end and not Millenium
Way which is the collector. I think we would point out that we would like to see some
kind of vehicular access in phase one over to Millenium Way.
Meridian Planning an¢L oning Commission
May 9, 2000
Page 9
Bowcutt: I think the applicant indicated at the last hearing he would be willing to revise
what they had proposed as their first 140 units because you felt or this commission felt it
was critical that they intersect with Millenium Way. So their will be an access. We will
go on the record with the first phase will intersect with Millenium Way by that vehicular
connection.
Barbeiro: The final point was, the gates we discussed in the last one to prevent cross
tracking through the residential from the high school over to Locust Grove, the
developer suggested putting gates in. Is that something that will be a final item for you
or is it still up in the air.
Bowcutt: I think they are still under the opinion that they would prefer some type of
gates.
Borup: This was a gate at which point?
Barbeiro: There was to be a gate over the Hunter Lateral crossing to prevent the kids
from crossing through the apartments and the developer also considered putting a gate
into the entrance off of Overland and just past the entrance off of Millenium Way. I
believe there were three gates. Is that correct.
Bowcutt: Yes, that was my understanding. We would have to have approval from your
fire department to install those. The location would also have to be approved by Ada
County Highway District because they want to make sure you have adequate stacking
room.
Borup: Has that been discussed with ACHD staff?
Bowcutt: It was brought up briefly and their comment was we have to have adequate
stacking room. They allow you to do it within a private roadway network as long as you
have it 50 or 75 feet into the property. Maybe its 100, 1 can't remember. The last one I
had was a mini storage. They don't want 3 or 4 cars turning into the site and then
waiting for the gate and sticking out into the roadway. I would recommend that the
commission put their subject to Ada County Highway District and fire department
approval.
Borup: The only other comment I think staff was on the fence —1 don't think the staff
comments addressed that either way, or did they. (Inaudible)privacy fence (inaudible).
There is no concern there is there.
Hawkins Clark: No.
Norton: I have a question for staff. At our last public hearing I had a question about
gates, but has been addressed. My notes say signage of gates would be worked out
with staff. Has signage been addressed.
Meridian Planning and-?oning Commission
May 9, 2000
Page 10
Hawkins Clark: Signage of the gates -of the project. They did have a written response
on signage from I believe Idaho Electric Signs and then McKeegan responded for
signage on the ice arena in writing. That should be in the packets.
Bowcutt: I think we did have a discussion because they had some types of lights on the
side of building.
Norton: That was addressed on the ice arena, but for the apartment complex—
Bowcutt: I did provide some specifications on signage. I believe it was a monument
type sign.
END OF SIDE ONE
Bowcutt: I'll have to check my packet. I believe it was a monument sign. That is what
staff has proposed.
Borup: I think we'd be comfortable that it wouldn't be anything difference than a
monument sign. Anything else. You checking or are you done Becky. Oh. Any final
comments from staff.
Hawkins Clark: Commissioner I think the main concern—I don't know that there is an
emergency vehicular access issue has been resolved to our satisfaction. With the
school site—schools are allowed in the R-4 without any public hearings. They can just
come in when they get this approved and not have any public hearings on the school
site and really this is the opportunity to deal with the school site even though the
majority of this—
Borup: You taking about a secondary access.
Hawkins Clark: Yes. What did they say potentially 1800 students or something. We
certainly understand and want to support the protecting these neighborhoods from cross
through traffic from the school, but there is a stub street here on the west boundary of
the site and then there is a stub street here immediately next to the future park site,
which would be here. Whether or not those are extended into the site or how that would
work, I guess our main issue or concern is that it be dealt with and maybe it can be
dealt with at Council level, but somehow there'd be another access into this 55 acre
school site other than just Millenium Way, particularly for emergency vehicles.
Borup: Have you discussed it to what point. Would the emergency break away ballards
or something like that.
Hawkins Clark: Right. I don't believe the fire department has really specifically
addressed it.
Meridian Planning anO--Zoning Commission
May 9, 2000
Page 11
Barbeiro: Brad, we have two opportunities to add emergency access. Is this where the
seminary is going?
Hawkins Clark: No. Here, right.
Barbeiro: With the new LDS church, is there any opportunity to have a emergency
access straight through their property or off of this road here as that roads appears to
abut the property of the high school.
Hawkins Clark: Commissioner, the LDS church is being built. It is designed. The site
is under construction. I don't think there is any opportunity there.
Borup: Sounds like here and here are the two stub streets. I don't think the intention is
to have a traffic flow through there. Break away emergency ballard would let the fire
trucks through and isn't that staffs concern. Do we know where this building maybe
sited.
Bowcutt: I can answer that question. The only information we received from the school
district is that the school would most likely sit back in this location here up against this
Hunter Lateral. Obviously the parking lots and field would be back here. There is two
existing public streets right here coming into Raven Hills and another one here in Los
Alamitos. It is the highway districts intention that those not be connected to the site
vehicularly for like student use but be connected for pedestrian bicycle and possibly
emergency access. I would assume something like ballards or maybe what they
propose there. It depends on the site configuration. I stopped at Mr. Carberry's office
today to see if I could obtain a copy of their draft site plan. He indicated that he does
not have a copy of it. You got one. He said I don't have one, in fact I think they are still
working on it. Your going to have to talk to Skyler at Hummel Architects. I said it would
be nice Jim if I could see it to make sure your needs are met as far as secondary
emergency access. Until we see where those circulation patterns of the school are
located, we don't know what to do.
Borup: Maybe at this point we just need to put some requirements in there and let them
design around it.
Bowcutt: Our agreement with the school district states that we ... the seller
acknowledges that the above described street, which is our Millenium Way, shall be the
sole access route to the school which buyer intends to construct on the premises other
than the emergency access here and after set forth. So, (inaudible) if we it we'd want
an emergency access through you.
Borup: So hereinafter set forth they are not specified.
Meridian Planning and-�.oning Commission
May 9, 2000
Page 12
Bowcutt: Yeah, it was emergency vehicle access if required. In order to meet uniform
fire code. (Inaudible) got a lot of parking lot along here, if they need it and if that is a
adequate location, then it makes sense that we do have a secondary emergency
access. It would all depend on their site plan and their needs.
Borup: What are saying would be secondary.
Bowcutt: If you look at—
Borup: Okay, the access is still from Millenium right?
Bowcutt: Yes sir.
Borup: So from Millenium Drive is blocked there is no secondary access.
Bowcutt: This is their primary vehicular access. There is landscaping and parking
areas—
Borup: Okay, your saying they could come down here through the parking lot into the
site.
Bowcutt: Exactly. So if the school says based on our configuration we need some
emergency vehicle access here or here or even link into this drive that wraps around
here. That would be an option. If its needed. I have not seen the site plan. Have you
seen it. You got a copy of it.
Barbeiro: It was the first draft which was two months ago.
Bowcutt: Oh. He said they are still working on it. I am going to try to obtain a copy
hopefully before we go to the council because I'd like them to see that and I think it
would be beneficial if we know what it looks like.
Borup: Sounds like the mood of the City and probably the Commissioner's is that there
needs to be some type of emergency secondary access. Not a vehicle access but just
emergency.
Barbeiro: So when building our recommendation we would include additional
emergency access through this site to be determined later. Or more specific.
Borup: I don't know that we need to be more specific as long as there is another
access.
Hatcher: One thing to take into consideration when we are discussing emergency
access of the future high school site is as Becky has pointed out, if we were to bring in a
second emergency access in the approximate location of the ice hockey arena or
Meridian Planning ansL?oning Commission
May 9, 2000
Page 13
possibly at the apartments, first of all the apartments are a congested meandering
parking lot. There is no primary means of traffic, just a private roadway system. I don't
think that is a valid option. Second, bringing a secondary emergency access in and
around the ice skating rink I don't think is a valid option either for the sample fact that if
you have a event occurring your going to have high traffic volume there. Playing devil's
advocate we have an event at the school that requires emergency vehicles and we
have the ice rink letting out. Millenium and all those roads are going to be plugged.
When considering an emergency access to the high school, I think we should look at
the options of doing emergency break away ballards down at Raven the Subdivision
down below with the public road.
Borup: What is the purpose of the secondary emergency access.
Hatcher: If the fire truck can't get to —
Borup: And that would be because of heavy traffic or because of some accident
blocking the entire roadway. I assume it would be something blocking the entire
roadway and then they would need another access.
Hatcher: That is correct and that is why I am saying if we (inaudible) by the ice rink,
they are too close together.
Borup: Your saying something would be blocking both roads.
Hatcher: I am saying if an event at the ice rink was to let out—
Borup: That's just heavy traffic. That's not necessarily blocking —
Hatcher: Hey, we've all been there. We know what it can really be like. One all ready
looks like it is all ready a culdesac if I'm not mistaken. One of the two southern ones—
we put the condition on the school district now and let them design accordingly and be
done with it.
Barbeiro: Couldn't we have a primary and a secondary.
Hatcher: You would. Millenium would be your primary. We are talking about the
secondary right now. I don't think this site is big enough to need three accesses.
Borup: Okay, one of you guys had a motion earlier.
Hatcher: I was trying to make a motion to close the public hearing.
Norton: I second the motion.
Borup: All in favor.
Meridian Planning and: -zoning Commission
May 9, 2000
Page 14
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Barbeiro: Which hearing did we just close.
Borup: Technically we closed—
Hatcher: Can we close all of them, one through six.
Borup: Technically we closed 3, cause that is the only one we opened. I think all the
testimony we received was on all the applications, so –
Hatcher: Mr. Chairman, I motion that we close the public hearing for Item 4,5,and 6.
Borup: Let me open it. Open public hearing for Item number 4.
Hatcher: I motion that we close it.
Norton: I second it.
Borup: All in favor.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Borup: I'd like to open Item number 5.
Hatcher: I motion that we close it.
Norton: I second it.
Borup: All in favor.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Borup: I'd like to open Item number 6.
Hatcher: I motion that we close that.
Norton: I second that.
Borup: All in favor.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Borup: Would you like to handle Items 1 and 2 and then go on to the others.
Meridian Planning ano-7,oning Commission
May 9, 2000
Page 15
Barbeiro: Can we do both of them at the same time.
Borup: They are both two separate items, but get those two out of the way and then get
into the other—or those two have all ready been closed, so—
Barbeiro: If there is no discussion, I have a motion. I motion that we recommend to
City Council request for annexation and zoning of 16.119 acres from RT to CG for
proposed Resolution Business Park by G.L. Voigt Development to include staff
comments.
Hatcher: I second the motion.
Borup: Any discussion.
Norton: I have discussion. I believe we discussed the CG change to CN change. I'd
like to make a friendly amendment to that motion that the CG be amended.
Barbeiro: Thank you Commissioner Norton, you are correct and I wish to amend that to
be a CN.
Borup: Any other discussion. All in favor.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Borup: Item number 2.
Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman, I wish to recommend approval to City Council request for
rezone of 37.64 acres from R-4 to L -O for proposed Resolution Business Park by G.L.
Voigt Development with staff comments.
Hatcher: Second the motion.
Borup: Any discussion. All in favor.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Borup: We have four more items. Again, comments have been concerning all of them.
We have two items on the preliminary plat. No one item, sorry.
Barbeiro: The discussion between myself and Commissioner Hatcher has to do with—
we would like—here's what we're differing. I would like to see a development
agreement between ACHD and the developer prior to any certificate of occupancy of
any building.
Meridian Planning an¢LZoning Commission
May 9, 2000
Page 16
Hatcher: What I was trying to go for on a condition of approval from this board or
recommended condition of approval to City Council would be that no certificate of
occupancy would be issued to any of the proposed developments of this project until
Overland Road improvements have been instructed. If that means the ice rink waits
until 2002 or 2003, so be it.
Barbeiro: You want a 5 lane road before anything opened. That is going to put a crimp
in the developer, but I think if we had a development agreement with ACHD and the
developer to have 5 lanes prior to fall 2002 when the high school opened, seeing how
the development would be phased, I believe that would be correct and proper with this
development. I would hate to see the development held back because the 5 lanes
wasn't open for then as a condition they have to ensure that it is at least 3 lanes. If they
are going to go out and do 3 lanes then ACHD is going to come in tear it out. That
seems like a tremendous waste of public funds.
Hatcher: Absolutely. If it boils down to working things out with ACHD.
Borup: Oh it does and I agree with what your saying there, but your putting a
requirement on the developer that they got no control over.
Barbeiro: If we have a development agreement, that is something the developer and
AC H D—
Borup: ACHD don't do development agreements specifically do they. Just a written
agreement.
Hatcher: Putting money into a slush fund for future improvement on this project is not
acceptable in my opinion. That is exactly what ACHD will do. I have no opposition of
the project. In fact it is a wonderful project. Overland Road can not handle any capacity
that this project would generate without the required improvements.
Barbeiro: So ACHD does not do development agreements so this—
Borup: I don't know if that is the terminology they use. I am not sure either way. I just
have not heard that used before.
Hatcher: Bruce can you comment on how ACHD typically has been dealing with those
issues.
Freckleton: Commissioner Hatcher and members of the commission Becky was just
indicating that she is aware of one that they have done with Touchmark. I know they do
non -development agreements when you have a plat and your doing it in phases if you
want to record the entire plat without bonding or building the other phase. That is
something we would have to address with them.
Meridian Planning anO–Zoning Commission �f^
May 9, 2000
Page 17
Barbeiro: What would staff's recommendations be to insure that somehow we have an
agreement amongst all the parties that this is going to be 5 lanes prior to a large portion
of occupancy. I do not want to put a high school there without a five lane road.
Hatcher: I personally don't want to stop the project. I don't want to stop construction of
any of the projects on the site, but I don't want to see any of them operable until the
road is done.
Freckleton: My personal opinion would be unless we've got it nailed down when these
things are going to happen, I would not even issue the building permit. Your looking at
a can of worms if you issue a building permit and hold up occupancy without some
dates being set.
Hatcher: Okay so the building permit will not be issued until some sort of agreement is
been reached without Ada County so that their construction schedule coincides with the
projects construction schedule as deemed by the time line we are discussing. Basically
what that does—I would say put one hand behind the developers back. Now we are
putting both hands behind with the building permit because there is a lot of negotiations
that have to go on between the developer and ACHD to meet these requirements.
Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman would it be of any assistance to re -open the public hearing and
;et some comments from the developer on this.
Hatcher: I don't think it is going to help.
Borup: Have you got your thoughts together on what it is that you maybe
recommending.
Barbeiro: Well, now that I know there really is no such thing as a development with
ACHD and my other concerns are that with the new high school, this would also stop
any issuance of a building permit for a new high school to be built which would cause
great problems with the school bond election coming up because of the state law
requiring the school to allocate the funds for and spend the funds any certain time
frame. If they can not get a building permit that may cause problems with the school
bonding.
Hatcher: Keep in mind as well as it was brought up by staff, school district does not
need public hearing. As soon as phase one is done and Millenium Drive is built, that
high school can go up. We have no control over that, so any conditions as of brought of
that includes traffic, any conditions we want to impose on that high school have to be
done during phase one. You could have 5000 high school kids going to high school on
a 2 or 3 lane road.
Borup: Do any Commissioner's remember what the going to the 3 lanes what that did to
the service and what the road could handle. I am not finding that. Do you remember
Meridian Planning ant=Zoning Commission
May 9, 2000
Page 18
that Brad at all. What capacity was that going to add. Where I was going or at least the
ACHD report is saying that the present configuration on Overland can handle a little less
than 3000 additional vehicles. In the same paragraph they are saying that it would add
6. They are over 3000 short without —that's with the current road. I am not sure what
the 3 lane would add to that capacity. I don't think it adds a lot of vehicle capacity. It
will alleviate congestion.
Hatcher: The third lane is a turning lane so it's going to allow people to stack up so that
they won't be able to turn left because of on coming traffic.
Borup: ACHD's statement is that a traffic signal is not warranted yet because traffic
volumes are low enough.
Barbeiro: That's Locust Grove and Overland, not Millenium.
Borup: No, the side driveway is on Overland. I don't think they are taking the school
into consideration on any of these figures. That adds a whole different aspect of it.
Barbeiro: I need your assistance on this so we don't shut down the developer, we don't
shut down the high school but we insure that there is a five lane road. Something that
we don't seem to have a lot of control over.
Borup: It is in the hand of ACHD. I don't have an answer to that. I think we can make
some recommendations and let City Council look at it.
Hatcher: The way we would want to word it to City Council would be that we
recommend approval pending —
Barbeiro: ACHD's commitment to widen that road.
Hatcher: Commitment is not good enough. It has to be in writing.
Barbeiro: Well, can the City work into a development agreement with ACHD as
opposed to the developer.
Hatcher: I don't think you want to bring the city into this.
Borup: Why would the city want to.
Barbeiro: We'd have a bigger gun than the developer does.
Borup: To do what.
Hatcher: We do?
Meridian Planning and -.Zoning Commission
May 9, 2000
Page 19
Barbeiro: Sounded good.
Borup: Lets go ahead. Lets get a recommendation drafted and put the conditions on
you'd like to and --. At this point I assume your going to incorporate staff comments.
Barbeiro: I have some comments within those too. Mr. Chairman, I move that we
recommend approval to City Council request for preliminary plat of 17 lots on 107.06
acres in proposed L -O zone and C -N zones for proposed Resolution Business Park by
G.L. Voigt Development to include staff comments making note of Item 8 on page 6 that
we would recommend an easement as opposed to a separately platted buffer—
Swartley: Mr. Chairman, Mr. Barbeiro what are you trying to do an easement as
opposed to a buffer?
Barbeiro: As I read it, the staff wanted to have a separate common lot as opposed to an
easement.
Swartley: Oh okay. I understand.
Barbeiro: That Item number 10 that applicant will go ahead and build a privacy fence,
Item number 11, the applicant will built a vehicular access over the Hunter Lateral
between site B and site A, included in that the developer will put a operable gate there
with cooperation of the Meridian Fire Department to prevent student crossing to get
over to Locust Grove. Help me out with number 12. The applicant wanted a minimum
of 35 foot landscape buffer. We are going to allow them to put a meandering sidewalk
as opposed to a sidewalk right up to the easement. Page 8, item 7 allowing them to—
Swartley: Mr. Barbeiro could you repeat the numbers 10 and 11 for me please.
Barbeiro: Number 10 were we—the developer build the privacy fence. Number 11 in
his cross access between site B and site A we put an emergency gate or a gate
between the two with the cooperation of the Meridian Fire Department. This is all
subject to the recommendation of ACHD and the Meridian Fire Department.
Borup: That was on the motion.
Hatcher: Road improvements, refresh my memory. We going to tack that onto the
preliminary plat or conditional use permit.
Borup: I thought you were doing it on the conditional use permit. I think they lumped it
all together. The traffic is going to be generated by the conditional use permit project
not by the plat.
Hatcher: Okay, lets see if I got this right.
Meridian Planning anr�-Toning Ccmmission
May 9, 2000
Page 20
Borup: ACHD's comments addressed everything all together. They combined all their
comments as a project as a whole.
Hatcher: The last outstanding issue I wanted to add to Commissioner Barbeiro's motion
is that a written agreement between the developer and ACHD that coordinates and
synchronizes construction completion of a 5 lane Overland improvement prior to the
completion of phase one occupancy. The agreement be submitted to the City of
Meridian prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Norton: I would like to add to that motion that a revised preliminary plat to reflect the
changes that have been discussed be submitted to the city prior to the City Council
meeting.
Borup: 1 think that was in the staff comments all ready.
Hatcher: So you made the motion, we amended it so your going to have to second it.
Barbeiro: To include their comments from Commissioner's Hatcher and Norton in the
motion.
Norton: I'll Second.
Borup: Any other discussion. Seeing none, all in favor.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Barbeiro: I wish to recommend approval to City Council request for conditional use
permit for proposed planned commercial development consisting of multi family
commercial, and LDS seminary in proposed L -O and C -N zoning by G.L. Voigt
Development to incorporate all of our notes from Item number 3.
Borup: This was a conceptual concept that was made mention earlier. This is a
conceptual approval of the project as a whole.
Barbeiro: And to include that page 10, item 11 storage areas that we waive the
requirement for storage areas, page 10 item 12 that we waive the requirement for a
maintenance building.
Borup: Actually that should come under item 5.
Barbeiro: Thank you Mr. Chairman. You are correct. (Inaudible) make the
recommendation for approval for incorporating all the comments from Item number 3.
Hatcher: I will second that.
Meridian Planning an�_Zoning Commission
May 9, 2000
Page 21
Borup: All in favor.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Borup: Okay now item number 5 which is the conditional use permit for the apartment
complex.
Barbeiro: I wish to recommend approval to City Council request for conditional use
permit for proposed 200 unit luxury apartment complex to be zoned L-0 for proposed
Resolution Business Park by Desert West Properties, LLC to include all comments from
Item 3 and Item 4 and from page 10 item 11 the storage areas waiving the requirement
for storage areas, page 10 item 12 waiving the requirement for a maintenance building,
page 11 CP apartment complex, item number 2 where staff recommends a number of
units constructed in phase one be limited to a maximum of 30, make that a maximum of
140.
Hatcher: I second the motion.
Borup: All in favor.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman I wish to recommend approval to City Council request for
conditional use permit for an ice arena consisting of office, pro shop, fitness center,
restaurant, locker rooms, equipment storage and arenas zoned L-0 by Pat McKeegan
to incorporate staff comments and comments from Item 3,4, and 5.
Hatcher: Before this last issue is voted on, the preliminary plat did we property address
the secondary emergency access to the high school.
Borup: No we didn't. We spend time talking about it and then did not get it in the
motion. We need to address that. We need to go back and amend the motion.
Norton: I second the motion on number 6.
Borup: All in favor?
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman, I wish to return to item number 3, the preliminary plat for the
17 lots and make an amendment to include the or note the developer will work in
conjunction with the school district and arrange a secondary emergency access through
their property apart from the primary access on Millenium Drive.
Borup: Do you want to be more specific.
Meridian Planning and-.7oning Commission
May 9, 2000
Page 22
Hatcher: I think you want to be more specific in location. What I just heard you say is a
second emergency access through the current development. I would prefer to have a
second emergency access through break away bollards down at Raven Hill.
Borup: The road is all ready there. The stub street is there. It is all ready dead ended.
Hatcher: It is a stub street. You'd have to dead end it with emergency bollards.
Barbeiro: Is the school property also part—
Borup: That is a separate lot and they will not be coming before us for the school
property.
Hatcher: It is not part of phase one but it is part of this development.
Barbeiro: I would concur. We have a secondary access from the south through one of
the two roads that are coming in.
Borup: Emergency break away bollards not direct vehicle access. I think that sounds
consistent with ACHD wants also. The no vehicle access is consistent. We need a
whole site.
Hatcher: You have the adjacent Subdivisions.
Borup: What do you want, street names. There is only two streets to choose from.
Two out of the two. Go over and talk to staff. Let them choose a street and it not come
from the north. Bruce, do you have any idea how man times in the last five years the
fire department has ever gone through the break away bollard. Okay that's what I felt.
Did you hear that comment Commissioner's?
Commissioner's: No.
Borup: As far as Bruce has understand it the fire department has never had to use
emergency access and the break away bollards. I am saying it needs to be there, but
its not going to be a traffic issue.
Hatcher: The one street we are talking about is East Blue Tick Street. The other road
appears to be South Red Cloud Avenue.
Borup: The reason I asked that question maybe for anyone living in those areas, the
emergency access not be a traffic—it hasn't happened yet in this town, but like anything
it is an emergency. It is there for emergency, so its there. Brad did you have some
input. The amended motion was to state a southern emergency access.
Meridian Planning and—Zoning Commission
May 9, 2000
Page 23
Barbeiro: A southern emergency access with break away bollards and not regular
traffic.
Borup: No specific street?
Hatcher: No specific streets required.
Borup: So, if they can come up with another street, that's fine.
Barbeiro: Before we make the final vote, lets see if staff has anything.
Borup: The motion that is in effect now is that there be an emergency access from one
of the southern streets, not from the northern. We did not specify beyond that. Did you
have anything to add.
Hawkins Clark: Commissioner just as a suggestion that was provided which has not
been considered. As far as emergency there is here on Locust Grove, as I understand
the goal of your discussion as a Commission is to help get emergency access so that
Overland is not the only way. Another one on Locust. One suggestion is to provide on
the southern portion emergency ingress egress here on the southern portion north of
this LDS church that is being built between the retail and the daycare which does
access the high school site.
Borup: So, that could be, a third option.
Hawkins Clark: Could be in terms of accessibility and response time for EMS, police,
fire. Certainly an argument can be made for greater direct access as compared to
going through either Los Alamitos or Raven Hill.
END OF SIDE TWO
Borup: to work out as far as the access for them.
Barbeiro: Okay lets go ahead and say that additional access the developer will work
with the school district of the options themselves for along the southwest boundaries.
Commissioner Norton, does that work for you? Okay.
Hatcher: I second the amended motion.
Borup: All in favor.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
Norton: Mr. Chairman I would like to have a little more discussion on number 5 with the
apartment complex. 140 apartments, does that also include the club house? I'd like to
Meridian Planning ana-Zoning Commission
May 9, 2000
Page 24
amend the motion then to include the club house to be constructed along with the 140
apartments.
Borup: Is that different that the original or what the developer was planning. And the
club house.
Norton: Okay, I'll withdraw that.
Borup: Anything or are we ready to move on. Let's take a short break.
7. TABLED FROM APRIL 11, 2000: REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL 77 FOOT HIGH POLE
SIGN FOR CHEVRON/MCDONALDS BY EAGLE PARTNER, LLC -603 S.
EAGLE ROAD:
Borup: This item was tabled to allow more information which I think you've each
received in your packets. Do we have any comments, questions or discussion or
anybody ready for a motion.
Norton: I am ready to make a motion on number 7. 1 would like to recommend to City
Councilfor mod;".. -:tion of conditicnal use permit to allow additional 77 foot
high pole sign for Chevron/McDonalds by Eagle Partners be denied based on using the
Comprehensive Plan as a guide only and taking into consideration the following: 1.
The pylon sign was not addressed in the development agreement with the city on March
9, 1999. 2. This commission made a decision in June of 1999 that a pylon sign is
inappropriate. 3. A Chevron pylon sign doesn't set an appropriate tone for entering the
Magic View Subdivision. 4. This pylon sign is too close proximity to a neighborhood.
Hatcher: I second the motion.
Borup: Discussion.
Barbeiro: When we voted in June of 1999 on this issue, the two primary items that I
saw were that the light from this sign would be detrimental to the neighbors and that
there was presented an ordinance that only freeway frontage could have such a sign.
In our last—
Borup: Freeway frontage or freeway business.
Barbeiro: Freeway business I believe it was. And, as I recall—do we have such an
ordinance. I was unable to find such an ordinance saying that freeway business or
freeway frontage is a requirement for a pylon sign.
Borup: I don't believe so.
200 E. Cartton Ave., Ste. 201
Meridian, ID 83642
Prime: (208)884.5533 CITY OF
Fax (208)888.6854
PlanningZoning
RECEIVED
To: Becky Bwo= Frv"c Sonya Dar CITY OF MERIDIAN
Fac 376-8713 Datoc st1 X00 CITY CLERK OFFICE
Phom Pages: 2 (Inducing aNer)
Reg Resduban Bus. Pari( CC: Wr fi 6m 8g g- qZI%
❑ urgw* 0 For ftwAsw ❑ Ploase Comment ❑ Please Rely ❑ Plea" Recycle
sGominonls
MAY 15 '00 16:52 2088886854 PAGE.01
Memo
TO: Becky Bowcutt
Frvrm Brad Hawkins -Clark e
cc: Shari Stiles, Will Berg, Bruce Freckleton
Date: 05/15/00
CITY OF MERIDIAN
CITY CLERK OFFICE
Re: Fire Department Approval of Gates in Resolution Business Park (File No. PP -00-06)
Becky,
As you know, on 519100 the P&Z Commission recommended approval to City Council of the
Resolution Business Parte applications. All six applications are scheduled for hearing at the
June 6, 2000 Council meeting.
One of the pending items that the Commission included in their motion was to install an
"operable gate" in the Tnew road between Site A and B with the cooperation of the Fire
Department in order to prevent students crossing over to Locust Grove. The size, exact
Placement, and type of Construction all need to be finalized. Please work with Kenny Bowers,
Fire Chief, on this and obtain written approval from Kennyn� c r to the meeting.
Also, prior to the June 60 meeting, please submit a revised copy of the plat showing the new
vehicular cross access between Site A and B, the preferred emergency access point (three
options were discussed by PBZ), and other revisions as required in the Staff report. If
Possible, it would also be helpful to have details from ACHD on what warrants would be
required in order to justify the new Locust/Overtand signal.
Thanks,
Brad
• Page 1
MAY 15 '00 16:52
20eeee6854 PAGE.02
WHITE, PETERSON, PA SS, MORROW & GIGRAY, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
JULIE KLEIN MscHER
Wm. F. QGRAY, ]H
200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE
BRENT J. JOHNSON
POST OFFICE BOX 1150
D. SAmuEL JOHNSON
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680-1150
WILLIAM A. MoRRow
WILLIAM F. NICHOLS
CHRISTOPHER S. NYE
TEL 208)288-2499
PHILIP A. PETERSON
FAX (308) 288-2501
STEPHEN L. PRuss
ERIC S. RossMAN
TODD A. ROSSMAN
DAVID M. SwARTLEy
TERRENCE R. WHITE
May 30, 2000
To: Staff
Applicant
Affected Property Owner(s)
Re: Application Case No. CUP -00-017
Hearing Date: Tune 6. 2000
NAWA OFFICE
104 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH
POST OFFICE BOX 247
NAMPA, IDAHO 83653-0247
TEL. 208)466-9272
FAX ( 08) 4664405
PLEASE REPLY TO
MERIDIAN OFFICE
j?.BCE1VE])
J U N - 1 2000
CITY OF MERIDIAN
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION
Staff, Applicant and/or Affected Property Owner(s):
Please note that these Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and
Zoning Commission shall be presented to the City Council at the public hearing on the above
referenced matter by the Planning and Zoning Administrator. Due to the volume of matters
which the City Council must decide, and to insure your position is understood and clear, it is
important to have a consistent format by which matters are presented at the public hearings
before the City Council.
The City Council strongly recommends:
That you take time to carefully review the Findings and
Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, and be
prepared to state your position on this application by addressing the
Findings and Recommendations of the Plannutg and Zoning Commission;
and
2. That you carefully complete (be sure it is leggi�ble) the Position
Statement if You disagree with the Findings and vecommendations
of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Position Statement
form for this application 1s available at the City Clerk's office.
It is recommended that you prepare a Position Statement and deliver it to the
City Clerk prior to the hearing, if possible. If that is not possible, please present your Position
Statement to the City Council at the hearing, along with eight (8) copies. The copies will be
presented to the Mayor, Council, Planning and Zoning Administrator, Public Works and the
City Attorney. If you are a part of a ggrroup, it is strongl recommended that one Position
Statement be filled out for the group, wFiich can be signed by the representative for the group.
Very truly yours,
ly/
BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE
REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR PROPOSED
MULTI FAMILY, COMMERCIAL
OFFICE AND LDS SEMINARY
DEVELOPMENT, TO BE
KNOWN AS RESOLUTION
BUSINESS PARK
G.L. VOIGT
Applicant
Case No. CUP -00-017
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY
COUNCIL
1. The property is located at the SE corner of Overland Road and S. Locust
Grove Road, Meridian, Idaho.
2. The owner of record of the subject property is G.L. Voigt of Idaho Falls
and Overland LLC of Boise.
3. Applicant is owner of record.
4. The subject property is currently zoned Ada County (R -T) and Meridian
R-4. There is a current application and recommendation before the Meridian City
Council for rezoning to L -O and C -N. The zoning district of L -O and C -N is defined
within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-7-2.
5. The proposed application requests a conditional use permit for a
commercial development consisting of multi -family housing, commercial offices and
an LDS Seminary. The L -O and C -N zoning designations within the City of
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 1
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK
—G. L. VOIGT
Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance require a conditional use permit be
obtained for most uses including those requested by the Applicant. (Meridian City
Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-8-1) .
6. The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission recognizes that the
proposed application is in compliance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
7. The use proposed within the subject application will in fact, constitute a
conditional use as determined by City Policy.
RECOMMENDATION
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to
the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the conditional use
permit as requested by the applicant, subject to the following. It should be noted
that this is part of a multi -faceted requested development including
annexation, rezoning, preliminary plat and 3 conditional use permits and
conditional recommendations contained in AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006,
CUP -00-015, CUP -00-016 and CUP -017 will apply where relevant.
Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as
follows:
1.1 This Conditional Use Permit is for the overall concept only. Future
phases of the project will require separate Conditional Use Permits for
each phase and each must substantially comply with the final approved
Concept Plan.
1.2 Planned Development Regulations: As a mixed/planned use
development, the Resolution Plaza development must comply with the
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 2
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK
—G. L. VOIGT
following sections of the subdivision ordinance: 12-6-4 Procedures for
Planned Developments, 12-6-6 General Regulations for Planned
Development, and 12-6-7 General Standards for Planned Developments.
In addition, residential areas must comply with 12-6-8-A Design
Standards for Planned Development -Residential. All commercial and
office uses must comply with 12-6-8-B Design Standards for Planned
Development -Commercial.
1.3 Colored Rendering: Colored renderings of the development must be
submitted prior to the City Council meeting to meet the intent of
Section 12-6-4 of the PD ordinance.
1.4 Open Space: All Planned Developments (PD) are required to have at
least 10% of the gross land area of the PD as common open space as 12-
6-7-E-5. The total common open space calculation for Resolution Plaza
is shown separately on Sheets 1-3 (Sites "A" - "C"). Site "A" is 4.53
acres (1.44 required), Site "B" is 5.29 acres (1.45 required), and Site
"C" is 4.10 acres (1.86 required). These calculations include landscape
buffers and islands. Standard practice has been that residential PD's
cannot count required buffers and landscape setbacks toward the 10%
open space requirement, but commercial PD's have been allowed to
count it.
Total gross site acreage for the Resolution Plaza project is 47.04 acres
(excluding public rights-of-way). 10% open space would be 4.7 acres.
The minimum amount of open space has been met. All open space
delineated as common open space must meet all standards of 12-6-7-E.
1.5 Parking: The matrix below summarizes the total off-street parking
counts for the conceptual PD -C:
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 3
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK
—G.L.VOIGT
Site/Use
Parking Proposed
Parking Required
Site "A"
--
--
- Retail pads N of first driveway (3)
257
250
- Retail office pads b/w driveways (2)
183
181
- Office SL day care pads S of second
driveway
189
100 (est.)
Site "A" Total
629
531
Site "B" (Apartment Complex)
553*
460 (2.3/d.u)
Site "C"
--
--
- Retail &_ office pads on Y2K Lane (2)
156
151
- LDS Seminary
17
20 (est.)
- Office buildings S of Gala St. (2)
129
98
- Retail &_ office buildings N of Gala St. (2)
317
287
- Ice Arena
278
286 (1/5) seats
The Applicant is proposing 152 tandem parking spaces for the complex. The
P&Z Commission discouraged tandem parking for a proposed apartment complex
of similar size in October 1999 (Valerie Heights). If the tandem parking is
subtracted from the total parking spaces, their total provided would be 401
spaces.
On the Site "A" plan, a row of parking is proposed along the south edge
of the north driveway and along both the north and south edges of the
south driveway with no separation. Given the likelihood of these private
driveways receiving high volumes of traffic at build -out (functioning
more as public roads), Staff feels this design would be unsafe and should
be relocated. The first parking stalls are less than 40 feet from the
property line and vehicles backing out of the stalls into the drive aisle
will lilcely be a hazard for vehicles entering the site off Locust Grove.
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 4
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK
—G. L. VOIGT
The proposed Ice Arena seats a total of 1,430 people. Technically, the
Applicant meets City ordinance, which is based on one stall for every 5
seats. If one assumes the arena will utilize the parking north of Gala
Street for evening events, an additional 317 stalls could feasibly be
added to serve the arena, providing a total of 595 stalls. The Applicant
should provide more detail on the hours of operation for the ice arena
and their experience with other similar venues and whether or not both
rinks will be used simultaneously.
1.6 Parking Lot Landscaping: Landscape islands serving a single row of
parking shall have one tree. Islands serving a double row of parking shall
have two trees. A minimum of one 3" caliper tree per 1500 square feet
of asphalt (including driveways connecting from the loop road) is
required per City Ordinance.
1.7 Streets and Circulation: Staff agrees with the proposed stub road (Gala
Street) to the east, unplatted property. As stated in the Preliminary Plat
comments, we recommend access be provided internally with a
connection between Sites "A" and "B". There is a conflict between the
Concept Plan and Plat for the Seminary site. The plat proposes a flag lot
for Lot 4, Block 1 (the proposed 19,648 s.f office building), with the
flag serving as the driveway. However, the Concept Plan shows the
seminary utilizing the flag driveway, not the office. Staff does not
disagree with the design, but it should be noted for future cross access
agreements.
1.8 Signage: The Applicant submitted a letter from Idaho Electric Signs
regarding signage for the apartment complex and a letter from Patrick
McKeegan outlining intent for the ice arena signage. The monument
signs shall not exceed 70 s.f. All signage throughout the PD -C shall be
coordinated and complement building materials and themes. This
applies to all future buildings.
1.9 Storage Areas: Per Ordinance 12-6-8.A. 1, Storage areas shall be
provided for the anticipated needs of boats, campers, motorhomes, and
trailers. No such areas are designated on the Site Plan. Applicant shall
either provide a storage area adequate to serve every two (2) living units
or provide evidence that storage needs can be met through an
alternative method.
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 5
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK
—G.L.VOIGT
1. 10. Maintenance Building: A maintenance building or approved area shall
be provided that is suitable for the services required for the repair and
maintenance of all common areas as per Section 9-607.H.3.
1.11 Trash Enclosures: No trash enclosures are shown on the Conceptual
Site Plan. Staff recommends all such areas be situated outside of view
from either Overland or Locust Grove Roads. Applicant shall coordinate
locations and construction requirements of the required trash
enclosures with Meridian Sanitary Service, Inc., and provide a letter of
approval from their office when applying for a Certificate of Zoning
Compliance.
1.12 Hours of Operation: No details of hours of operation are provided. For
the future CUP applications, all office and retail uses should be
harmonious with the apartment complex and residential homes to the
west.
1.13 Alternative Transportation Options: At build -out, this site will serve as
a principal center of employment for the east Meridian/west Boise area.
While Boise Urban Stages does not currently service Overland Road, it
has the potential to be a likely destination point for mass transit in the
future. Staff strongly recommends an area be designated and/or
preserved on the Concept Plan for a future bus stop. We also
recommend the inclusion of bicycle racks at all office and retail
buildings and the ice hockey arena.
1.14 All conditions placed on this application shall run with the land and
shall not lapse or be waived as the result of any change in tenancy or
ownership of any or all of the lands governed by this CUP application.
All such conditions shall be deemed the requirements for the issuance of
a Certificate of Occupancy for any use or structure as per City
Ordinance.
1.15 Applicant shall utilize the Ada County Highway District design
standards for the private street within this development, with the
exception of width requirements. Street designs shall be reviewed and
approved by the City of Meridian Public Works Department.
ey/Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\Recommendations\CUP017Resolution.wpd
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 6
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — RESOLUTION BUSINESS PARK
—G.L.VOIGT
Will Berg
From: jansyl@micron.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 9:07 AM
To: bergw@ci.meridian.id.us
Subject: Fw: G.L. Voigt Development of Resolution Business Park City Council
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 5:39 PM
Subject: G.L. Voigt Development of Resolution Business Park City Council
To: Meridian City Council
Re: G.L. Voigt Development
Mr. Berg,
U N - L 2000
CITY OF INIERIULN
Tammy DeWeerd suggested I send the following information to you in the event I am unable to attend the
6/6/00 meeting regarding G. L. Voigt and the development of Resolution Business Park.
I currently reside in the Summerfield Subdivision at the NE corner of Ustick and North Locust Grove in the
city of Meridian. This subdivision was developed by G.L. Voigt ( a few phases were not, but I am addressing
the ones that were).
The developer was responsible for the perimeter fence. A fence was erected, however the section on Locust
Grove is falling over after only three years.
The developer was responsible for the pressurized irrigation system. A trouble -prone pooly designed system
was installed causing several homeowners unneccessary expenses.
The developer was responsible for drainage in the subdivsion. Houses were built such that water drains to
the adjacent house to the rear. No drainage was installed between the 'park' and the adjacent lots causing the
park to drain to the adjacent properties.
Drainage problems occur in the street storm drains, they appear to be under -sized.
The deveoper was responsible for each lot being built. There is one home in Summerfield that has been
under construction for 6 years.
The developer was supposed to provide a common area 230 x 140, large enough to accomodate a soccer
field. I still haven't come across that yet.
If the Council decides to approve the development of Resolution Park by G. L.. Voigt what, if any, checks and
balances will there be to assure that:
a) the project won't fall apart in 3 years
b) quality design will be used
c) drainage problems will be addressed and resolved prior to construction
d) the project will be completed
e) the developer will provide all that has been agreed upon
Thank you,
Jan Sylvester
1775 E. Summerheights Drive
Meridian, Idaho
6/6/00
83642
208 8845680
6/6/00
June 15, 2000
CUP 00-017
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 20, 2000
APPLICANT G.L. Voigt / Overland LLC ITEM NO. _rt
REQUEST Findings - CUP for proposed Resolution Business Park for PCD consisting of
multi -family, commercial, office and LDS seminary in proposed L -O and C -G zones
south of Overland Road and east of Locust Grove Road
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
COMMENTS
See attached Findings
�, ✓,sem
Of
Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
-q1D V Sl cv { Yrq [(�
i n to roff ice
MEMORANDUM
PcElvED
To: William G. Berg, Jr. .1 J N 1 5 i_000
From: William F. Nichols CITY OF MERIDIAN
Subject: G. L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND 16, L.L.C. PLANNED
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
File No.: CUP -00-017
Date: June 13, 2000
Will:
Please find attached the original FINDINGS OF FACT
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS, pursuant to action of
the Council' at their June 6, 2000, meeting. The Findings will be on the Council's
agenda for their June 20, 2000, meeting.
I have also attached the original of the ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, if the Council approves the
FINDINGS.
Please serve copies of both documents upon the Applicant and
appropriate departments.
If you have any questions please advise.
msgfZ:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\Resolution Business Park AZ RZ CUP PP\C1kLtrCUPffcls&Order17
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING:
APPLICANT : �d� �/ AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
Xef�9&�i� A
REQUEST:
fu i 7 }s-rz a & r� AL P&
cvye,- � Ze C*ti" 61'ov-e
AGENCY
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:,
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
ADA STREET NAME COMMITTE:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
`VY��,R
COMMENTS
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT MA) 0 .1 nno
Planning and Development Division City of Meridian
Development Application Report Citti Clerk office
Preliminary Plat — Resolution Business Park /
MAZ00-004/MCUP00-015/MCUP00-016/
MCUP00-017
rg-z- -A/-6
Locust Grove Rd/Overland Road
An application for a preliminary plat has been submitted to the City of Meridian for a 17 -lot residential
and commercial subdivision on 107.06 -acres. The applicant is also requesting conditional use and
rezone approval. The City has forwarded the application to ACHD for review and comment. The site
is located at the southeast corner of Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. This development is
estimated to generate 9,430 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic study.
Roads impacted by this development: Locust Grove Road
Overland Road
ACHD Commission Date — May 3, 2000 - 12:00 p.m.
Resolution Subdivision
Page 1
MAY 09 '00 14:29 PAGE.02
Facts and Findings:
A. General Information
Owner
— G.I. Voigt
Applicant
- Same
R-4, RT
- Existing zoning
L -O, C -G
- Requested zoning
107.06
- Acres
17
- Proposed lots
200
- Proposed multi -family dwelling units
346,000
- Square feet of proposed building
125,000 -square feet of Office building
145,000 -square feet of Retail building
57,000 -square feet of an Ice Rink
19,000 -square feet of Day Care Center
Meridian High School
2,300
- Total lineal feet of proposed public streets
286
- Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ)
West Ada - Impact Fee Service Area
Meridian - Impact Fee Assessment District
Locust Grove Road
Minor arterial with bike lane designation
Traffic count 3,552 on 7-16-99
A -Existing Level of Service
C -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service
950 -feet of frontage
50 to 70 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline)
96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline)
Locust Grove Road is improved with two lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. The segment
of Locust Grove Road abutting the site is not listed in the current Five Year Work Program for
reconstruction.
Overland Road
Minor arterial with bike lane designation
Traffic count 11,422 on 11-30-99 (west of Eagle Road)
Traffic count 9,916 on 11-23-99 (west of Locust Grove Road)
D -Existing Level of Service
E -Existing plus project build -out Level of Service
2,640 -feet of frontage
50 to 70 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline)
96 -feet required right-of-way (48 -feet from centerline)
Resolution Subdivision
Page 2
MAY 09 '00 14:30 PAGE.03
Overland Rod is improved with two lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. The segment of
Overland Road abutting the site is listed in the current Five -Year Work Program for
reconstruction to 5 -lane in FY (2004).
Blue Tick Street/Brandys Jewel Street
Local streets with no bike lane designation
No traffic count available
50 -feet of frontage
50 -feet existing right-of-way (25 -feet from centerline)
50 -feet required right-of-way for their extensions
Blue Tick Street and Brandys Jewel Street are improved as 37 -foot street section with curb,
gutter and sidewalk.
B. On March 27, 2000, the District Planning and Development staff inspected this site and evaluated
the transportation system in the vicinity. On March 31, 2000, the staff met as the District's
Technical Review Committee and reviewed the impacts of this proposed development on the
District's transportation system. The results of that analysis constitute the following Facts and
Findings and recommended Site Specific Requirements.
C. Locust Grove Road has 3,522 existing vehicle trips per day, which is a Level of Service A (LOS
A). An acceptable Level of Service for this segment of roadway is D (LOS D) or 14,000 vehicle
trips per day. The proposed application will add approximately 3,000 vehicle trips per day on
Locust Grove Road.
D. Current traffic counts indicate that Overland Road carries 11,422 vehicle trips per day (VTD).
The planning threshold for Overland Road is 14, 000 VDT with its current configuration. When
Overland Road is rebuilt to five lanes, the planning threshold for Overland Road will be 33,000
VTD. The proposed application will add approximately 6,000 vehicle trips per day on Overland
Road, therefore the existing, plus project traffic exceeds the planning threshold of Overland Road
with its current configuration. When Overland Road is rebuilt to five -lanes, the roadway will be
adequate to accommodate the traffic generated from this site.
E. The Eagle Road/Overland Road intersection operates at a Level of Service E/F threshold, and is
listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The subject site's additional traffic will
exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection. The District has already initiated a project (to
be started within the next few months) to provide additional turn lanes and make other capacity
enhancements to improve the intersections' operating characteristics. The improvement plans
have not been finalized but the anticipation is for a substantial increase in capacity.
F. The Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection operates at a Level of Service F (LOS F), and is
listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. The subject site's additional traffic will
exacerbate the traffic problems at the intersection.
G. A traffic study was submitted for the Resolution Subdivision site development plan. The key
findings of the traffic study include the following:
Resolution Subdivision
Page 3
MAY 09 '00 14:31 PAGE.04
•►. 100`�..
• The proposed development is expected to generate 12,495 total daily vehicle trips. An
estimated 3,045 trips are pass -by trips, leaving 9,430 new daily vehicle trips added to the
adjacent roadway system.
• The Meridian Road/Overland Road intersection currently operates at Level of Service
(LOS) F. Because Meridian Road is a principal arterial, LOS E is acceptable under
current District policy. The intersection exceeds the allowable Level of Service.
• Under "existing plus project" traffic volumes (Year 2005), the Meridian Road/Overland
Road intersection is expected to operate at Level of Service (LOS) F. The District has
currently programmed a project to upgrade Overland Road to create additional capacity.
The design and magnitude of the improvements have not yet been determined. Because
Meridian Road is a principal arterial, LOS E is acceptable under current District policy.
• The Locust Grove Road/Overland Road intersection currently operates at an overall
Level of Service (LOS) A. The intersection is STOP controlled only on the two Locust
Grove Road approaches. Left turns from northbound Locust Grove on to westbound
Overland Road operate at an LOS F condition. If a traffic signal were constructed with
the existing traffic volumes and roadway geometry, the intersection would operate at an
overall LOS B.
• Under the existing traffic volumes, Locust Grove Road operates
at an arterial LOS of A with volume -to -capacity ratios of less than 0.35 during peak hour
conditions.
• The Year 2020 traffic forecast of 18,000 vehicles per day for Overland Road indicates
the need to widen the roadway from two to five lanes. The widening is desirable from
an operational and safety standpoint and is required within 500 feet of the Eagle Road
intersection.
• The Year 2020 traffic forecast of 8,700 vehicles per day for Locust Grove Road does not
indicate the need to add capacity.
• The forecast traffic volumes at the Locust Grove Road intersection with Overland Road
justify a traffic signal under existing plus project traffic volumes. The applicant should
be required to provide 25 -percent of the cost for the traffic signal, which is $37,500.00.
The District will construct the traffic signal when it is warranted.
• The site driveways on Overland Road are expected to have traffic volumes low enough
that traffic signals are not needed.
• The new public street intersection on Overland Road is expected to have traffic volumes
that warrant a traffic signal. The applicant should be required to provide 75 -percent of
the cost to construct the traffic signal, which is $112,500.00 (total cost is $150,000).
The District will construct the traffic signal when it is warranted.
• The site driveway intersections on Locust Grove Road are expected to have traffic
volumes low enough that traffic signals are not needed, however, all the intersections on
Locust Grove Road will require the construction of a center turn lane.
• All the intersections on Overland Road will require the construction of a center turn lane.
Due to the locations of the intersections and the taper lengths required for the turn lanes,
the applicant would be required to add another traffic lane on Overland Road abutting the
entire site.
• The consultant was not aware of ACHD's project to widen the Overland Road/Eagle
Road intersection when the TIS was performed. The Eagle Road/Overland Road
intersection was identified to operate at Level of Service (LOS) F under existing and
build out conditions. The District is adding turn -lanes at the intersection this fiscal year,
Resolution Subdivision
Page 4
MAY 09 '00 14:32 PAGE.05
which will improve the operations of the intersection to an adequate Level of Service D
(LOS D). Overland Road is scheduled for reconstruction from two to five lanes in FY
2004. When the roadway is reconstructed to five lanes, the intersection will operate at an
adequate Level of Service C (LOS C).
H. The applicant is proposing a stub street to the south property line located 1,000 -feet west of the
east property line. District Staff supports the location of the stub street. The applicant should
provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub street with a temporary easement
provided to the District. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the
roadway stating that; "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the
sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff.
The applicant is proposing a stub street to the east property line located 400 -feet south of
Overland Road. District Staff supports the location of the stub street. The applicant should
provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub street with a temporary easement
provided to the District. The applicant should be required to install a sign at the terminus of the
roadway stating that; "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the
sign plan for the stub street, and the design of the turnaround with District staff.
The improvement of Overland Road abutting this development is included in the District's current
Five Year Work Program. District policy requires the applicant to provide a $52,800.00 deposit
to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing a 5 -foot wide concrete
sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the parcel (approximately 2,640 -feet) prior to District
approval of a final plat, whichever occurs first.
K. The improvement of Locust Grove Road abutting this development is not included in the District's
current Five Year Work Program. District policy requires the applicant to construct a 5 -foot wide
concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel prior to District approval of a final
plat. The sidewalk should be located two feet within the new right-of-way of Locust Grove Road.
Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff.
L. The applicant is proposing two driveways on Locust Grove Road. The driveways are located as
follows:
♦ The northern driveway is proposed to be located 440 -feet south of Overland
Road.
♦ The southern driveway is proposed to be located 690 -feet south of Overland
Road,
Peacock Street intersects Locust Grove Road from the west approximately 550 -feet south of
Overland Road and Labrador Street approximately 1,100 -feet south of Overland Road. District
policy requires the applicant to locate driveways on Locust Grove Road a minimum of 440 -feet
south of Overland Road and 220 -feet from the streets on the west side of Locust Grove Road.
The applicant's proposed driveways do not meet the required offset from Peacock Street on the
west side of Locust Grove Road. The applicant should be required to locate the northern
driveway to align with Peacock Street to west, and the southern driveway should be located 75 -
feet north of the south property line. The driveways should be constructed 30 to 35 -foot wide
with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers abutting the roadway. The applicant should be required to
Resolution Subdivision
Page 5
MAY 09 '00 14:32 PAGE.06
provide 100 -feet of stacking for both the inbound and out -bound travel lanes for the driveway.
Coordinate the design of the driveways with District staff.
M. The applicant is proposing three driveways on Overland Road. The driveways are located as
follows:
♦ 480 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the
applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this
driveway.
♦ 930 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the
applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking for this
driveway.
♦ 1,280 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: based on the submitted traffic study the
applicant should be required to provide a minimum of 100 -feet of stacking for
this driveway.
All the driveways align with existing driveways on the north side of the road, which meets
District policy. The driveways should be constructed 30 to 35 -feet wide with 15 -foot radii
pavement tapers abutting the existing roadway edge.
N. The applicant is proposing to construct two public roads off Overland Road. The roads are
proposed to be located:
♦ 320 -feet west of the east property line: based on the submitted traffic study the
applicant should be required to locate driveways off this public street a minimum
of 100 -feet south of Overland Road. The roadway should be constructed as a 40 -
foot street section with curbs gutters and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within
58 -feet of right-of-way.
♦ 850 -feet west of the east property line: based on the submitted traffic study this
roadway should be signalized and driveways on this roadway should be located a
minimum of 175 -feet south of Overland Road and consecutive driveways should
be required to align or offset a minimum of 150 -feet. The roadway should be
constructed as a 46 -foot street section with curbs, gutters, and a 5 -foot wide
concrete sidewalk within 64 -feet of right-of-way. This road should be signalized.
The applicant should be required to construct a signal for the new intersection.
Coordinate the design of the signalized intersection with District staff. The
District should provide 25 -percent of the cost of the signal.
♦ The applicant is proposing an cast/west road located 400 -feet south of Overland
Road: the applicant should be required to locate driveways on the new roadway a
minimum of 50 -feet from a public street intersection. The applicant is proposing
a traffic circles within the roadway. The street section around the traffic circle
should be constructed 29 -feet wide. A YIELD sign should be installed at all
approaches into the islands and directional islands should be constructed in the
street approaches to the traffic circles to guide motorists in the proper direction.
The pedestrian crossings shall be located at the intersection to improve
pedestrian/vehicular recognition and safety. Coordinate the traffic control plan
and location of the pedestrian crossings with District staff.
Resolution Subdivision
Page 6
MAY 09 '00 14=33 PAGE.07
In order to provide safe turning movements into the driveways and streets on Overland Road and
avoid a continuous meandering travel path a continuous turning lane is required from Locust
Grove Road to the east property line. The design will provide turning movement at all driveways
and streets through and including Locust Grove and new east -west street.
O. ACHD's Park & Ride Division Staff have indicated the need for a park and ride location at the
applicant's site. The District requests that applicant grant the District an easement for a 10 to 12 -
space Park & Ride area at this site. Commuteride staff will contact the applicant to coordinate the
location of the Park & Ride area.
P. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that Tenants occupying
the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for
employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff
will coorduiate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information
contact Pat Nelson at 387-6160.
Q. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, it is recommended that the tenants
occupying the proposed building(s) be required to participate in any Transportation Management
Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a
boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development.
R. A Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization
(TMO) is formed with a coordinator that works as a liaison between businesses and private and
public transportation providers to increase the use of alternative transportation and other trip
reduction measures (shuttle buses, bus pass programs, vanpools, carpools, bicycle and walking
enhancements). An annual survey will be required of the TMA/TMO to monitor participation in
alternative transportation programs and forwarded to the ACHD Commuteride Office.
S. District policy states that direct access to arterials and collectors is normally restricted and that the
developer shall try to use combined access points. In accordance with District policy the
applicant should be required to provide a recorded cross access easement among the lots within
the proposed subdivision for use to access the public streets prior to issuance of a building permit
(or other required permits).
T. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Locust Grove Road abutting
the entire site. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff.
U. The applicant should be required to construct a center turn lane on Overland Road abutting the
entire site. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff.
V. Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being
tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with past action by the District the applicant should be
required to pave all driveways their full width and at least 30 -feet into the site beyond the edge of
pavement of Overland Road and Locust Grove Road and install pavement tapers with 15 -foot
radii abutting the existing roadway edge.
W. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the undeveloped parcels abutting this site may
be required upon review of a future application for this site.
Resolution Subdivision
Page 7
MAY 09 '00 14:34 PAGE.oe
X. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, may
be placed on future development of this parcel.
Y. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the school parcel abutting this site should be
extended upon review of a future application for this site.
Z. Based on development patterns ui this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates
that the transportation system will require improvement in order to accommodate the additional
traffic generated by this proposed development. The Overland Road/Meridian Road intersection
currently operates at deficient Level of Service F (LOS F), and is listed as one of the 100 critical
intersections in Ada County. The reconstruction of the intersection by the District is not listed in
ACHD's Five year Work Program.
The following Site Specific Requirements and Standard Requirements must be met or provided
for prior to ACHD approval of the final plat:
Special Recommendation to City of Meridian:
In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that tenants occupying
the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for
employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride
staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more
information contact Ms Pat Nelson at 387-6160.
2. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, the tenants occupying the proposed
building(s) should be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association
(TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that
includes this site or is adjacent to this development.
ACHD's Park & Ride Division Staff have indicated the need for a park and ride location at the
applicant's site. The District requests that applicant grant the District an easement for a 10 to
12 -space Park & Ride area at this site. Commuteride staff will contact the applicant to
coordinate the location of the Park & Ride area.
4. The transportation system will require improvement in order to accommodate the
additional traffic generated by additional development. The Overland Road/Meridian
Road intersection currently operates at a deficient Level of Service F (LOS F), and is
listed as one of 100 critical intersections in Ada County. Additional traffic will exacerbate
the traffic problems at the intersection. The reconstruction of the Overland
Road/Meridian Road Street intersection is not currently listed in ACHD's Five year Work
Program.
Resolution Subdivision
Page S
MAY 09 '00 14:35 PAGE.09
Site Specific Requirements:
Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Overland Road abutting the parcel by
means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance
of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business
days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner
will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right-of-way from
available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to
the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD
Ordinance 9193.
2. Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel
by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to
issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30
business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The
owner will be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated as an addition to existing right-of-way
from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of
application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section
15 of ACHD Ordinance 9193.
Provide a stub street to the south property line located 1,000 -feet west of the east property line.
Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub with a temporary easement
provided to the District. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD
WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and
the design of the turnaround with District staff.
4. Provide a stub street to the east property line located 400 -feet south of Overland Road. Provide
a paved temporary turnaround at the end of the stub with a temporary easement provided to the
District. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE
EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the design of
the turnaround with District staff.
Provide a $112,500.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for 75 -percent of the
cost to construct a traffic signal on Overland Road for the new collector roadway. The District
will construct the signal when it is warranted.
6. Provide a $37,500.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for 25 -percent of the cost
of constructing a traffic signal at the Overland Road/Locust Grove Road intersection. The
District will construct the signal when it is warranted.
7. Provide a $52,800.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of
constructing a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Overland Road abutting the parcel
(approximately 2,640 -feet) prior to District approval of a final plat, whichever occurs first.
8. Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel prior to
District approval of a final plat. Locate the sidewalk two feet within the new right-of-way of
Locust Grove Road. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff.
Resolution Subdivision
Page 9
MAY 09 '00 14:36 PAGE.10
9. Locate two driveways on Locust Grove Road as follows:
♦ The northern driveway shall be located 550 -feet south of Overland Road to align
with Peacock Street to the west.
♦ The southern driveway shall be located 75 -feet north of the south property line.
The driveways shall be constructed 30 to 35 -foot wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers
abutting the roadway. Provide 100 -feet of stacking for both the inbound and out -bound travel
lanes for the driveways. Coordinate the design of the driveways with District staff.
10. Locate three driveways on Overland Road as follows:
♦ 480 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minnnum of 50 -feet of stacking
for this driveway.
♦ 930 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 50 -feet of stacking
for this driveway.
♦ 1,280 -feet east of Locust Grove Road: provide a minimum of 100 -feet of
stacking for this driveway.
The driveways shall be constructed 30 to 35 -feet wide with 15 -foot radii pavement tapers
abutting the existing roadway edge.
11. Locate two public roads as follows:
♦ off Overland Road 320 -feet west of the east property lune: locate driveways off
this public street a minimum of 100 -feet south of Overland Road. The roadway
shall be constructed as a 40 -foot street section with curbs gutters and 5 -foot wide
concrete sidewalks within 58 -feet of right-of-way.
♦ off Overland Road 850 -feet west of the east property line: driveways off this
roadway shall be located a minimum of 175 -feet south of Overland Road and
consecutive driveways are required to align or offset a minimum of 150 -feet.
The roadway shall be constructed as a 46 -foot street section with curbs, gutters,
and a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 64 -feet of right-of-way. The applicant
shall be required to construct a signal for the roadway/Overland Road
intersection. Coordinate the design of the signalized intersection with District
staff.
12. Locate an east/west road 400 -feet south of Overland Road: locate driveways on the east/west
roadway a minimum of 50 -feet from a public street intersection. The traffic circle within the
roadway shall be constructed to provide a minimum of 29 -feet wide street section around the
traffic circle. A YIELD sign shall be installed at all approaches into the island and a directional
island shall be constructed in the street approaches to the traffic circle to guide motorists in the
proper direction. The pedestrian crossings shall be located at the intersection to improve
pedestrian/vehicular recognition and safety. Coordinate the design of the buffer circle, the traffic
control plan and location of the pedestrian crossings with District staff.
13. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways,
shall be placed on future development of this parcel.
Resolution Subdivision
Page 10
MAY 09 '00 14:36 PAGE.11
14. Construct a center turn lane on Overland Road abutting the entire site.
15. In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the school parcel abutting this site should be
extended upon review of a future application for this site.
16. Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel
access to Overland Road and Locust Grove Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as
required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat.
Standard Requirements:
A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall
be made in writing to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall
specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of
why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity. The written request
shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for ACHD
Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on
the next available meeting agenda.
Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action
do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and
report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items
will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission.
2. After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action
shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the
action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall
specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of
data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its original decision. The request
for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the
Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of
the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard.
Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance
with Ordinance #193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance,
4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy
Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all
applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the
State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit
(or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes.
6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
Resolution Subdivision
Page 11
MAY 09 100 14:37 PAGE.12
7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way.
Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to
ACRD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full
business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact
ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are
compromised during any phase of construction.
8. No change in the terns and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing
and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized
representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to
obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District.
9. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or
other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in
interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject
property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to
the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought.
Conclusion of Law:
ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity
impacted by the proposed development.
Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development
Division at 387-6170.
Submitted by:
Commission Action:
Planning and Development Staff May 3, 2000
Resolution Subdivision
Page 12
MAY 09 '00 14:38 PAGE.13
MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING — APRIL 11 2000
The regular scheduled meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission was
called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Keith Borup.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Keith Borup, Sally Norton, Kent Brown, Tom Barbeiro, Richard
Hatcher.
OTHERS PRESENT: David Swartley, Bruce Freckleton, Brad Hawkins Clark, Christie
Richardson, Ray Voss, Will Berg.
Borup: Good evening ladies and gentlemen. We'd like to begin the Planning and
Zoning Commission meeting regular scheduled meeting for Tuesday April 11 th. First
item is minutes from the March 14th meeting. Any comments, questions, additions on
the minutes. Does that mean no.
Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman I wish to make a motion that we approve the minutes from the
March 14th meeting as submitted.
Norton: I second.
Borup: All in favor.
MOTION CARRIED: 3 AYES, 1 ABSTAIN
Borup: Item number 1 and 2 is tabled from the previous meeting. Items 3,4,5,6 are
continued public hearings all on the same project. I'd like to hear a staff report first on
the status. We continued awaiting the ACHD report, which we have not received. Brad
have you got some update on that.
Hawkins Clark: Yes Commission Borup and Commissioner's, the first two items as you
know, you closed the public hearings. The others, particularly the plat, was continued
for the purpose of receiving the Ada County Highway District report. Our department
spoke with Ada County Highway District this afternoon and they have requested that,
number one, the packet that you received that had the draft ACHD staff report be
omitted and not entered into the record. There was some mistakes and confusion on
that. Number two, the date for the resolution ACHD commission meeting was set for
tomorrow night. That has been moved off of tomorrow nights agenda. There has not
been a new date set. They are in the process, I understand, of working with the
developer on several major issues related to the road widening and other issues of
dedication and such. Those discussions are happening with ACHD staff and the
developer and a revised report has not been submitted for your consideration.
Borup: Thank you. Any questions from the Commissioner's. Brad, do you know
whether the developers representative is here tonight.
Meridian Planning and Z,''ng Commission Meeting
April 11, 2000
Page 2
Hawkins Clark: I believe Becky Bowcutt from Briggs Engineering did call. I did not
speak with her but she did call and state she was not coming. There may be someone
else present. I don't know.
Borup: Before we open the hearing, is there any one here representing the application?
Thank you. Commissioner's in light of the fact that these were continued for a specific
purpose, receiving the ACHD report, is there any motion you'd like to make. I think we
could deal with all six items probably in one motion.
Norton: Mr. Commissioner. Does staff know when we'd get a ACHD report.
Hawkins Clark: We do not.
Norton: Mr. Chairman, can we state a meeting date which we could continue this.
Borup: If we continue, it would need to be to a date certain.
Hatcher: Are there standard scheduled meetings now.
Borup: Not yet. I don't think—we won't have anything from ACHD in 2 weeks any way.
Hatcher: I make a motion then that we take the first six items on our agenda and
continue them until our regularly scheduled meeting which would be May gtn
Barbeiro: I'll second the motion.
Borup: Motion and second to continue items 1 through 6 for May 91h meeting. Any
discussion. All in favor?
MOTION CARRIED: 3 AYES, 1 ABSTAIN
Borup: All right, nine minutes after and we've gone through 6 items.
Norton: Would it be possible to move number 15 up next as the applicant had
submitted a letter.
Borup: I think the applicants letter was submitted concerned that it might be bumped
from the agenda, was my understanding. I think out of fairness to the other applicants
maybe lets at least take the next two and then and then discuss that. That sound all
right.
Meridian Planning and Zc,,iqg Commission Meeting
April 11, 2000
Page 3
Berg: Mr. Chairman and members of the Commission, the concern about moving items
different from what the agenda, we as an agency we publish our agenda and people get
in their heads trying to figure out a time they need to be there, so we just got to be a
little bit of leery of moving them too far without the public trying to out guess the time
frame. I try to discourage to out guess what the decisions of the commission might be
but they still try to do that. I think it is a good idea to maybe to try to not push some
things real early if they are late on the agenda unless we can get that notice out a little
bit earlier to the public.
Borup: I think we make sure the items heard tonight one way or the other without going
all night.
Brown: Just for the audience to understand, I'd like to make a statement about what our
purpose is here. We are a voluntary body. We are not elected. We are just citizens
like yourselves. Hopefully that will bring a few more smiles then what I see out there
tonight. We are just residents of the City of Meridian and the area of impact, just like
you are. We volunteer our time to come down here and make recommendations to the
City Council. Our decisions are only recommendations to the Council. They are the
decision making body. We spend time reading the reports and weighing the information
and hopefully that will make us a little more happy in this meeting. I understand that
everybody has their own kingdoms in which they live and hopefully we can do the best
for the City of Meridian. Thank you.
7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR RV SALES, RV RETAIL AND REPAIR ZONED I -L BY MAPLE
GROVE R.V.-2490 W. FRANKLIN ROAD:
Borup: Brad, have you got anything additional. I think we received a revised plat which
is what we requested from last time.
Hawkins Clark: Yes Commissioner. Not a plat but a site plan should have been
received right. This was continued from the April 3`d meeting. It is my understanding for
two reasons. One was to obtain a revised plan per the staff recommendations and then
the second was for the variance application regarding the paving. There was—you
should have in your packets a March 27 letter from our fire Marshall and Chief, Skip
Voss and Kenny Bowers dated March 27 regarding this project as well as an April 6th
letter from Matthew Dugan. Just for the benefit of the audience the cross hatched on
the screen is the property subject property. The revised plan dated April 6th which you
should have, does address most of the staff comments that we had. They are providing
a 30 foot landscape setback instead of the 35, but giving the situation of the building on
Franklin and here is the—actually we do not have the revised site plan available for you
on the slide. It was not provided in 8-1/2 by 11 so apologies for that. The fencing, they
are providing solid wood only in the rear storage area. Staffs initial aim on that was to
see fencing on the site, but that would be a commission decision as to whether or not
Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Special Meeting
March 22, 2000
Page 23
have another light at that point and then go out to Eagle. This 1/3 of a mile was –the
light was much later on until of course it is all built in so they would go a light at Locust
Grove, the high school and 1/3 mile.
Bowcutt: That was one of the things that they discussed today was the timing of that. I
think they believe that the light at Locust Grove would come first. My question to them
when the overpass is constructed which that may become a reality from what I'm
hearing. Its being lobbied for. My question was, would that light then the money spent
be wasted and their indication was no. They would have to move the light, but the
money spent would not be wasted.
Barbeiro: Apart from that when you talk about moving the light—when they planned the
lights they still will likely be out far enough where they can build the road and not move
the lights. All they have to do is rewire.
Bowcutt: One of the engineers thought they would probably have to move it a little bit.
Why they do that I don't know. Maybe they can't get it out that far when the roadway is
up here. The arms are only at certain length. I don't know. He thought it would have to
be moved.
Borup: Thank you.
Norton: Mr. Chairman, I am ready to make a motion. I move that we continue this
public hearing to April 11, 2000 so we can hear and read the ACHD report. This is for
the request for the preliminary plat of 107.06 acres of LO and CN zoning for proposed
Resolution Business Park.
Barbeiro: I would second the motion Mr. Chairman.
Borup: All in favor?
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES
4. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR
PROPOSED PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF
MULTI -FAMILY, COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND LDS SEMINARY, LO AND CG
ZONING BY G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC—OVERLAND
AND LOCUST GROVE ROADS:
Borup: Brad. Would you like to explain the difference between Item number 4 and Item
number 5. I'd like to open the public hearing.
Hawkins Clark: Yes, the difference between Item number 4, conditional use permit for a
conceptual overall plan. This CUP basically is not approving any specific use that is
currently shown up on the screen. It is simply the applicant is coming to us and saying
Meridian Planning and Z — ng Commission Special Meeting
March 22, 2000
Page 24
as a concept, will the city approve this conditional use permit. Anything that would
come in, if you do approve it, would have to substantially comply with this plan. The
planned unit development commercial, which it is called, is designed to be the overall
under lane foundation approval for the whole entire 55 acre site or whatever the
acreage is. The conditional use permit does not include the high school property. This
is—you were talking about strictly these two parcels up here. Specific conditional use
permit with more specific details on parking, trash enclosures and this would be a
general compliance and I think something that we have used as a department has been
that if for instance if the City approves this overall concept plan, we are not talking about
specific footprints of a 20,000 square foot retail and a 10,000 here. We are talking
about general concept that if it differs by more than 20 percent in the future, then we
would say that that is not permitted. Again, that is not ordinance. That is more or less
the procedure internally. The purpose of this would be for the developers compared to
coming in for each one piece meal. They are saying we want to look at this overall
project. We want to get general conceptual approval.
Borup: I want to make sure everyone is understood the difference here as far as Items
5 and 6 will be for specific items that is listed on the application. Thank you.
Hawkins Clark: I think there are a couple of points on the staff report dated March 20th
to point out. I think the applicants response details most of those. I think there is
general agreement that the future uses will all require conditional uses. They are
proposing two of those tonight. On Item number 4 which the applicant has stated that
they disagree on a couple of points. One is the multi family project which is the site B
designated on the screen. 200 units including a club house area which here off of
Overland Road, the entrance would be coming into the club house is a general
receiving area here, the club house situated here with another amenity there. There are
each proposed unit as I understand would be approximately 10—each building would
be 10 dwellings. One of the requirements that the city has for most residential planned
developments is that any RV's boats those kinds of things they provide storage areas.
They are stating that any resident would with RV's would have to store those offsite and
staff has no problems as long as that is made clear and a condition. In terms of the
maintenance building proposed for (inaudible) landscaping and that kind of thing, they
are proposing that that be a landscape company which bring their equipment from
offsite. On the parking issues the staff report does provide a matrix that outlined the
proposed parking and the parking required. Item number 7 and we certainly don't want
to see a lot more asphalt either. Our only purpose in pointing that out is as you can see,
most of the items the site A, which includes the retail pads and the offices and day care
on the west side of the project, that would be all taking access off of Locust. They
exceed the number of parking. Parking required is 531. They were proposing 629
stalls there. In the apartment complex, there is a issue of the tandem parking and we
simply want to point out that with Valeri Heights that was something that was discussed
and some complexes and property management complexes pointed out the difficulties
with that. We really don't have a strong position either way. Just wanted to point out as
far as consistency. I think they seem to be well parked and when you include the
garages there is 401 spaces there. On the ice arena again talking conceptually, they
Meridian Planning and Zc—,,g Commission Special Meeting "
March 22, 2000
Page 25
are looking at about 1430 seats inside the arena. Technically they meet the city
ordinance which is based on one parking stall for every 5 seats. The applicant also did
submit a more detailed narrative about their anticipating mostly smaller numbers, some
evening events which they could use the parking that is north on site C. It may not be
directly serving the ice arena but it would be within walking distance certainly and that
would provide them, if they incorporated the other parking on the office and retail sites
around there. We said 595 stalls. Since the City of Meridian doesn't have much
experience with ice arenas we feel it important to leave that up to the applicant who has
more experience with the type of use. There was some comparison with ice world up in
Boise at the near the airport out there. They have had they based their parking ratio on
one for every four seats. Understand that they are not having too much difficulty with
some events in terms of meeting parking demand. There is some other issues in terms
of the hours of operation and alternative transportation. They have agreed in terms of
the bike racks and a future bus stop. Potentially designating an easement somewhere
within the site for a future bus stop. We would point out that would be important to
include as a condition to facilitate future mass transit options. We are recommending
again as the other ones that it be continued since there has not been a ACHD report.
Borup: Any questions from the commission? Does the applicant have anything to add.
Seeing none. Becky did you have anything to add.
Bowcutt: Becky Bowcutt, Briggs Engineering. I am representing the applicant in this
matter. As staff indicated, this is a planned unit development application asking for a
conceptual approval of the mixed uses on this particular site. Every user is required to
have a separate site specific conditional use permit. The two applications behind this
one –one deals with the apartments the other deals with the ice arena. As I indicated
before, we know three of our users. The rest of our users are anticipated. We
understand that we are committing to circulation patterns, parking requirements, etc.
There is always a little bit of minor deviation when you go from a conceptual design to a
final development plan. We do expect a little bit of deviation. It is just a given in the
industry. We feel that this provides the city with an over look at what is going to
happen. One of the big complains like along Fairview, along Overland and some of
those areas is what they call a strip commercial development where you have small
parcels adjoining a particular arterial. You have independent users coming in asking for
rezones and conditional use permits for a multiple type of uses and there's not any over
all through in the layout, interconnection, pathways etc. Everything is done on a piece
meal basis. The advantage of the PUD is that we can come in and master plan these
two parcels. It is approximately 54 acres in size. The properties are under two
separate ownerships who are cooperating on this application. I'll go into staffs
comments, you should have a copy of my responses. We concurred with many of staffs
requirements or statements and we did state in writing that we understand or that we
are in agreement. Item 4, we are in agreement with all sections listed with exception of
section 12 -6 -8 -Al -2-3. These particular requirements, Item 1 is storage areas. It says
storage areas shall be provided for anticipated needs of boats, campers, trailers, etc.
Within the multi family project any type of recreational vehicles will be prohibited. So,
we do not want to provide a mini storage facility for those types of vehicles. Those will
Meridian Planning and Zc`ig Commission Special Meeting
March 22, 2000
Page 26
be stored at a public mini storage off site somewhere else. Item 2 under that is parking
space. It reads one additional parking beyond that which is required by the zoning title
may be required for every three dwelling units to accommodate visitor parking. In all my
previous multi family applications with the City of Meridian and the City of Boise and
many other jurisdictions, two parking spaces per unit for multi family is a standard. The
staff has asked for 2.3. 1 think that that is excessive. All we are doing is creating more
asphalt, more hard surface and we are taking away from what can be done with
common areas and landscaping. It has never been applied in this fashion before to my
knowledge on any application that I've had. I have not see one recently that it's been
applied and I'd like to reference that it states maybe. One item unique about this project
is the fact that each unit has a minimum of one and up to two enclosed, attached
garages that are built into the building itself. We also have additional surface parking
like you would find in a standard apartment complex. In front of some of these garages
you would have a driveway, very similar to what you'd find at a single family dwelling. If
you visited a friend there very often, you probably most likely will know what building
they live in and were their garage is. You could park behind it. I don't feel that the .3
percent is required or needed here. I understand the City in the past has not counted
tandem parking and we did not count tandem parking in our parking calculations. We
have 401 spaces. We have 200 units.
Borup: Is you 401 include the garage
Bowcutt: Yes sir. The tandem we felt was just gravy. We had a substantial number of
tandem parking spaces.
Borup: Could you show that drawing to the audience.
Bowcutt: That particular design I've heard it referred to as a manor house. As far as
apartment buildings are concerned, it is probably one of the most pleasing designs that I
have ever encountered. The closest thing to that would probably be the Renaissance
Apartments at Hobble Creek. We did the civil engineering on that project and I
processed their conditional use permit. Those were very attractive. They used a lot of
brick, a lot of decking, off sets in the exterior. That is what this building provides. Going
back to the tandem spaces, we have 240 attached garages, 161 surface parking and
then 152 so called tandem spaces. Technically you could fit 553 vehicles on the site, if
necessary. We feel that we have met if not exceeded, the parking requirements of this
facility. Therefore, that is why we do not believe that .3 or that section 2 of 12-6-$A
should be applied. Thirdly, the requirement for Item 3 is a maintenance building that
you will provide a maintenance building. I think that was put in the ordinance before the
days of lawn care company's. All of the projects in this development will be retaining a
lawn care company. They house and store their own equipment and bring it onsite, do
the work and exit. We have no need for a maintenance facility. I'd like Mr. McKeegan,
the architect for the ice arena, to address the statements from staff concerning their
project because they know their project better than anyone and then I will have a
representative from apartment complex may want to make some statements concerning
their parking also.
Meridian Planning and Z(` ,g Commission Special Meeting
March 22, 2000
Page 27
Borup: Excuse me Becky, are you saying you'd like to do testimony of both of those at
this point rather then at the specific conditional use permit for the —
Bowcutt: The only reason was there was some of staffs comments directed at those
users as part of this concept. Is that acceptable to the commission.
Borup: I think it is if you want to—then they be coming back up again for the same
thing.
Bowcutt: I think they are just going to address staffs comments, not do their
presentation.
Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman, before the architect comes up if I could ask staff a question. In
figuring out the 2.3, were you aware that Briggs Engineering did not include the tandem
parking spaces in their configuration for the two spaces per unit?
Hawkins Clark: Yes.
Norton: Mr. Chairman, I have a comment or a question for staff. For myself and for the
audience could you please explain what tandem parking is please.
Hawkins Clark: That would be if on the garage units directly behind the garage as
compared to a separated out delineated parking stall that is designated just for a stall
you'd actually have parking behind the garage which typically would obviously prohibit
movement in and out of the garage. It is technically a space that vehicles could park.
Borup: On this definition its tandem would be two parking spots. One is in the garage
and the driveway leading to the garage. Essentially like any single family home.
McKeegan: My name is Patrick McKeegan. I am representing the applicant for the ice
rink. My address is 419 S. 8th Street, Ste. B in Boise Idaho. At this point in time I just
want to address the specific items that were requested under item number 7 by staff for
this application. What I specifically wanted to address was the parking issue. In order
to do that I have to talk a little bit about how we are going to operate the facility.
Basically the ice rink is going to have 2 sheets of ice. One is going to be a standard
NHL sheet and the other one is going be built to Olympic standards. It will be the only
Olympic ice rink west of Salt Lake City. That has a little bit of significance because
currently the U.S. and Canada are the only countries where hockey is played on in ice
skating event and exhibitions and competitions take place on anything less than an
Olympic size rink. The number of seats that we are providing in the facility is around
1400 which sounds like an awful lot but the true operation of the facility, if you have 2
sheets of ice with two teams playing on each sheet of ice, an average hockey team has
12 to 16 players, so that would mean you would have between 24 and 32 players on
each sheet of ice, 64 participants then the referees and coaches, so you may have at
any given time during a practice or standard play, you have both sheets of ice are
Meridian Planning and Z(—ig Commission Special Meeting
March 22, 2000
Page 28
booked approximately 100 persons who, some of who would be sharing the driving in
coming to the facility. Approximately once a month we would anticipate having an event
that would be a tournament for league play or perhaps a ice exhibition. Bring in ice
skaters or perhaps an exhibition of profession teams from Europe for instance playing a
local or American professional teams and giving them a Olympic size venue to show
with the different skills actually. Skating on Olympic ice is much different than to play on
Olympic ice. It is much different on American ice because you have more of a
defensive and strategy game because you have 15 feet wider area to play. We are
providing with our area 278 packing spaces. If we are only having during peak periods
non event periods 100 per hour there we feel that we have provided more than enough
parking at that time and that the additional 7 spaces over what is required or what staff
is requesting the additional 7 spaces could come from the retail and office spaces. The
reason we believe that is because most of the events will take place on weekends when
the office building will not be occupied or in the evening again when the office buildings
will not be occupied. Except for architects and planners it seems like most people get to
go home around 5 or 5:30 so that space frees up. The reason we'd like to have that
kind of shared agreement is so that we are not providing an additional 100 or 150
spaces of asphalt anymore than is needed. We just basically ask that we be allowed to
provide the number of spaces that is shown. That concludes my comments right now
on this specific item. I will get more on the design of the building and that during the
specific conditional use hearings. Also, I would like to mention that I do have a
representative from the development group on the operational side of it that will be here
to answer questions to. I just thought of one more thing. There was a lot of discussion
about pedestrian access to the school and stuff and kids driving off the school to go eat.
We are going to do everything we can to capture those kids before they get offsite. In
our facility we are going to have some eating facilities and we are going to —one of the
things that is being pushed right now is that trying to make hockey a letter sport in the
high schools. We anticipate that happening in the next two to three year. One of the
reasons that we selected this site was because we knew the high school was going in
there. We knew the City of Meridian was lacking in recreational opportunities and we
wanted to do some with the existing recreational facilities down the road with Roaring
Springs and those facilities. Also we want to be able to work with the high school so
that to give them the kids there some opportunities for recreational opportunities without
having to drive somewhere else.
Borup: Becky, did you say someone else wanted to testify at this point. Okay, thank
you. I'd like to continue the public hearing with any public testimony at this time.
Bartell: Marianne Bartell. 2434 S. Velvet Falls Meridian. I just have one comment and
that is if you look at the plan over there, they have the orange as the commercial. I
went to a meeting last week regarding the Master Plan for Meridian and hypothetically it
sounded very lovely. The neighbors with a convenience store and this type of
development, not heavy, solid commercial in one area. The people from north Meridian
were crying for stores, gas stations. We are being inundated with commercial,
commercial, commercial. We moved there thinking that was going to be residential. An
apartment complex was all ready voted down once by the City Council because the
Meridian Planning and Zo — g Commission Special Meeting
March 22, 2000
Page 29
people turned out so highly against it. We are only talking about approximately 1/8 of
the acreage there between that mile, that 50 some acres, isn't there close to 400 all
together. Beyond what you are showing on Resolution Park.
Borup: Your just saying clear to Eagle Road.
Bartell: We moved there with all the intention of being in a residential area. It is
becoming a heavily impacted commercial area. Not just servicing our area, but bring
people in from other areas to come there. That is not what the conception of the Master
Plan was from what I understood last week. It was servicing the area, not bringing
people into the area and traffic into the area. It is away from the Master Plan. There is
nothing in north Meridian, it is all right in that area. I just—it doesn't seem to go with the
Master Plan and I don't think it goes with the neighborhood and what they desire.
Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman, if I may ask Miss Bartell a question please. In the 20 year plan
and in the original plan, all of the freeway frontage was intended to be commercial.
That is what I was trying to understand.
Bartell: I am talking about south of Overland and all of that area. Everyone that moved
into that area was under the impression that was all going to be residential. We put our
roots down. We planned to stay there until we moved out in a pine box. We don't want
to see it a heavy commercial area where people are coming to it. In the Master Plan,
my understanding was that each area is to be developed with their own little commercial
center and surrounding neighborhoods and to make it a nice place to live. Instead it is
becoming heavy commercial all condensed into a solid area and that is very undesirable
to the people who live there.
Borup: Is that it?
Avera: My name is Herman Avera. 947 E. St. Martin Drive. I am the president of the
Meridian Greens HOA, a community of all most 300 homes that took 9 years to build up.
During that time we have seen the City of Meridian more than triple in population and
witness the impact that this population growth has had on the cities supporting
infrastructure, including schools, roads and police protection. As a neighborhood that
is likely to be directly effected, we are concerned that the approval of this development
will have severe negative consequences on our local infrastructure and would urge that
you recommend against approval of this development until the following problems are
resolved. First, schools. According to Mr. Jim Carberry's report to the City Council last
July, the elementary and high school effected by this development are all ready
currently over capacity. Middle school is at capacity. Many of us have children in
these effected schools and are all ready troubled by the problems of the over crowded
classrooms cause. Knowing the difficulty of passing school bonds here, doesn't it make
sense to delay construction of high density housing which would quickly add students to
these all ready over crowded schools until at least some new schools are built to handle
the in -flow. You have all ready covered the traffic problems. Police and fire protection.
Even if the crime and emergency rates per person remain constant, this development
Meridian Planning and Zc'�,ng Commission Special Meeting
March 22, 2000
Page 30
with high density development, a high school, new businesses and the rink, will
increase the reported incidents in our part of Meridian. This increase will require
additional police and fire resources to handle the problems in this area. According to a
recent article in the Idaho Statesman, the police captain Dave Bowman is quoted as
saying, we are not keeping up with the growth, in fact I think we are falling behind. This
is the current situation independent of the additional growth due to this proposed
development. If we can't handle the current situation, how will be deal with this
increase. Meridian Greens is a Subdivision that was built up over nine years and we
have seen how difficult it is to increase Meridian's infrastructure to keep pace with the
population growth rate. While we can understand the City's desire for higher density
housing, and additional commercial tax revenue, we urge the commission to delay this
project until the infrastructure in this area has been developed to handle our current
needs, as well as the new needs for this development. Thank you for listening.
Borup: Any questions from the commission.
Barbeiro: A part from this individual development for residents, the Meridian School
District will be adding 1100 new students per year which, according to Mr. Carberry will
require at least 2 new elementary schools per year for the next 6 to 10 years. The
intent for the high school, they hope that is, was a bond for the high school, an
additional Jr. High School and 2 new elementary schools with the hope that they would
all come in in the Fall of 2002. The frustrating part is that we can't continue to build
schools, yet this individual development will have as much impact as any development
anywhere. What is it about this development that is of a greater priority or lessor priority
of other developments in increase of student flow.
Avera: I can't speak to the other developments personally, but Meridian Greens has
taken 9 years to add 300 homes. We are talking about adding 200 residents here in
probably less than 5. 1 am just afraid that adding that many new residents with children
to the school system will over load it faster then we can build new school for it.
Barbeiro: Again, my point is that the school district is aware and is planning...
Avera: Well, planning it and getting the money to do it by convincing 2/3's of the voters
to pass a bond is not the same thing. Until is happens, you won't have the rooms to put
the body's and they will have to go in the existing buildings. I probably don't speak for
the majority of the people here, but the taxes that I pay on my home to send my kids to
school I would gladly pay double for if it kept the rest of the community at a lower
density.
Keeling: Delores Keeling. I live at 2575 Bayou Bar. Some time ago where there was a
petition on the north side of Overland for 275 apartment units, we came out in mass and
against that because of the impact on the area. Overland would be much over
crowded. The children would not have any way to go to the Boon Docks. There aren't
any sidewalks, Now we going to put in 200 apartments on top of a new high school,
business. It seems unreasonable that we would put more apartments in when we have
Meridian Planning and Z(— ig Commission Special Meeting
March 22, 2000
Page 31
all ready fought. Meridian Greens along has 800 petitions against that on the north
side. I just don't under stand it and if we are going to put commercial in all the way on
Overland, let's go commercial or else raise the —can the high school be put up on
Overland so that we don't have to have businesses on Overland.
Borup: The school district doesn't own the property there. That was their choice I am
assuming.
Keeling: I am objecting and I am sure there is many here that do object to the
apartments. Everything else, if they can get the money for it. You get the impact fees
from businesses not from residential. Why don't they make Overland —zone it for
businesses so that we can get the impact fees for the schools that we need.
Borup: A single family home is 1294 dollars. Business are more. Your saying you'd
like to see all commercial.
END OF SIDE THREE
Borup: You'd like to see a light there.
Keeling: Absolutely.
Brimhall: My name is Reed Brimhall. I live at 840 E. Martinque in Meridian Greens. I
just want to give you a couple things to think about. We have not talked much about
Overland Road west of Locust Grove. Every morning I try to turn left out of southeast
5th and I don't know that my wife thinks I am patient or not. I think I am. It is a
frustrating experience any time between 7 and 8 in the morning and coming back in the
evening. I came down tonight. I got off on Eagle tonight. I usually get off at Meridian
because I knew we were going to come a participate tonight. As I drove down Overland
and stacked up against Locust Grove, I actually started laughing about this discussion
we were going to have tonight because the amount of traffic there was on that road at
5:15. It took me close to 10 minutes to get from Eagle to S.E. 5th. The problem doesn't
just end at Locust Grove. The problem goes all the way to Meridian Road, particularly
with the developments on the other side. We talked about widening to 5 lanes the one
mile between Eagle and Locust Grove and no discussion about widening the rest. We
can't ignore that. The second, I grew up in Pocatello across the street from the football
stadium there in a residential area called University Park. It was built when I was in
high school, so it is really old. It is called the mini dome for those of you who may have
watched football one time or another. My parents recently moved out of their home
there. I can tell you with things like high school activities and that ice arena and those
once a month activities that he is talking about. There were times when my parents
would go for 2 hours without being able to get out of their drive way because of the
traffic going in and out of those activities. You'll have people trying to get out of SE 5th
and SE 3`d and out of Locust Grove and out of the arterial that come out of their homes
at the same times these events are happening. Even with widened roads with those
Meridian Planning and Zc — g Commission Special Meeting
March 22, 2000
Page 32
residential areas so close, your talking about a lot of frustrated people because of the
volume of traffic.
Babbit: My name is Carl Babbit. I live at 1671 E. Time Zone. I have probably been in
this area longer than anyone here because I grew up here. One of our Subdivision Los
Alamitos was our farm. I guess what I'd like to say is I have no problem with any of that.
I know it is coming. It is growth and I know everybody says they moved out there to be
in the Country but everybody moves out to be in the Country and then it is not the
country anymore. I guess my concern is, I read in the paper that they are talking about
the Meridian Comprehensive area and they have had a citizens committee working on
it. Well even them have said we need a 5 lane on Overland Road before we do
anything. That is the some statement of it. Let's build this but let's get the 5 lane road
first. If there is any power here, that is where it needs to go. We all know it is going to
grow but let's put in the road. That is what I am asking.
Borup: Do you have a solution where the money should come from.
Babbit: I think, they are talking about the 5 lane from Kuna Meridian Road up to Locust
Grove. Impact fees have been paid on that for how many years now. We've go
Subdivision's all on one side. We have Coke and all those places on the other side.
The impact fees have been paid. I know they just don't set that aside for that road. The
impact fees have all been put in for that. There is one mile that is all ready paid for.
Borup: The residential don't have enough fees to pay for a mile.
Babbit: Well they don't but with the equipment on the other side and we have all the
people working there. I think we are sticking our heads in the said if we are saying that
that doesn't need to be five lane. The money has been there. It should have been
planned. You can take the impact fees on South Locust Grove there is a Subdivision a
whole mile there with impact fees on them. That's not planned for 20 more years. It's
there. We just need to use it. I would say they have a good idea paying half of the mile
between south Locust Grove and Eagle Road. They pay half. The county pay the other
half. I do happen to know the people who bought that land have a lot of money. They
are going to make money. So they are going to be willing to do it. This is where the
Commissioner's need to come in and say this is what we want. We are talking about
the overpass over the freeway. That is where you guys come in. We have to do this.
That is what I am asking is that you guys step up and not just wait and hear what the
county says and do what they want. That is what I am asking for all of you.
Barbeiro: I want to applaud the organization that your neighbors have had in the past
and having objected to a residential development kitty corner from where this is going
now. If your neighbor organization were to walk in with 150 people to Ada County
Highway District meeting and one by one walk up to that podium and tell them what you
want, they will do it. Then they come back to us on how they are going to do it. It is
unfortunate that their meetings are at noon, but the impact that your organization had at
Meridian Planning and Zr—)g Commission Special Meeting
March 22, 2000
Page 33
the City Council meeting would be equal if not greater at a Ada County Highway District
meeting.
Babbit. I don't usually know when they are. If that was given out and published and
maybe to our Subdivision—
Barbeiro: They are advertised in the Local section of the Idaho Statesman. They
usually have 2 or 3 days advance notice for each of the meeting.
Bowcutt: One of the residents asked why does this corridor have to be commercial. If
they look across to the north side of Overland Road, we have adjoining uses such as
Cesco Equipment, Freightliner, a contractors yard, an RV Park, that is a commercial
zone but those users in my opinion are far greater an intensity than your average
commercial use. They are more of an industrial use. We have a major arterial that
some day is going to be a 5 lane road. You don't put single family resident up against
that. We try to provide some type of buffer. Those buffers are multi family, commercial
office then you transition into the interior of the section of your single family. That is
what we call good planning and I think with the new Comprehensive Plan map, that is
what they are trying to accomplish so that we don't end up with home backing up to 5
lane arterials in the future. All of us impact each other in this valley. It was said, this is
going to draw people there. Yes, some people may be drawn there to go to the ice
arena, but it may capture some traffic that may not go through some one else's area
which would reduce the number of trips on our arterials. You've got to think of it from
both perspectives. It is a give and take.
Barbeiro: Becky I have a question I want to ask you if I may. In your draft plan we have
a zig zag road here. I am reminded of Park Lane from the highway to Eagle High
School. It is a giant drag strip. Is there any other types of road or something that we
could do in there that would discourage teenage hot rodding down that 600 foot strip.
Bowcutt: Typically with those types of collectors, we're not trying to make them do 90
degree turns. A collector is to move high volume of traffic in relatively short period of
time. Local streets we try to make 90 degree turns to cut down on the speeds. I don't
see them putting traffic calming devices on collectors either. I don't necessarily think
that that is one thing that the highway district would endorse. There is no way you could
logically go about that. We are trying to make it convenient. We don't want people
cutting through elsewhere. It is a short stretch. I don't think they can get up real high
speeds through there, but you never know.
Norton: I'd like to continue this pubic hearing to April 11, 2000 for the conditional use
permit for the proposed planned commercial development consisting of multi family,
commercial, office, an LDS Seminary, LO and CN zoning.
Barbeiro: We have a motion and second to continue the public hearing to April 11. All
in favor.
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING: March 22, 2000
APPLICANT: G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT ITEM NUMBER: 4
REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING
OF MULTI FAMILY COMMERCIAL OFFICE AND LDS SEMINARY
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING & ZONING DEPT
CITY ATTORNEY:
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WASTE WATER DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE
COMMENTS COMING
SEE COMMENTS
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: ] Il
l�
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: SEE COMMENTS
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SEE COMMENTS
SETTLERS IRRIGATION: I
IDAHO POWER:
l
US WEST:
1
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
SANITARY SERVICE:
OTHER:
All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
MAYOR HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
Robert D. Corrie A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT
CITY OF MERIDIAN 08) 288-2499 L - Fax 288-2501
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PUBLIC WORKS
Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-22 11 • Fax 887-1297
Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813�C�TF.� PLANNING AND ZONING
Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 s DEPARTMENT
FFB 2- 200E (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854
TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian
Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations
to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13, 2000
TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000
FILE NUMBER: CUP -00-017
REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF MULTI -FAMILY, COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND LDS
SEMINARY – PROPOSED LO AND CG ZONING
BY: G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC
LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND
ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED)
SALLY NORTON, P/Z
KENT BROWN, P/Z
THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z
_RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z
_KEITH BORUP, P/Z
_ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR
_RON ANDERSON, C/C
CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C
_KEITH BIRD, C/C
_TAMMY de WEERD, C/C
_WATER DEPARTMENT
_SEWER DEPARTMENT
SANITARY SERVICE
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
POLICE DEPARTMENT
_CITY ATTORNEY
_CITY ENGINEER
_CITY PLANNER
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT
IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM & FINAL)
YOUR CONCISE REMARKS.
i#105 -'U'ewt)
CCCENTRAL CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
•• DISTRICT Environmental Health Division
""HEALTH
DEPARTMENT
Rezone ##
—Do -1017
Preliminary /Final / Short Plat
Return to:
❑ Boise
❑ Eagle
❑ Garden City
Meridian
❑ Kuna
❑ ACz
❑ I. We have No Objections to this Proposal. LIAR 6 2004
❑ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. CTTV OF K,__
❑ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal.
❑ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment.
❑ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of:
❑ high seasonal ground water ❑ waste flow characteristics
❑ or bedrock from original grade ❑ other
❑ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or
surface waters.
❑ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and
water availability.
8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for:
Ecentral sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water well
❑ interim sewage )central water
❑ individual sewage ❑ individual water
9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare,
Division of Environmental Quality:
central sewage ❑ community sewage system ❑ community water
❑ sewage dry lines ff central water
10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
❑ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other
considerations indicate approval.
❑ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage
Regulations.
❑ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any:
❑ food establishment ❑ swimming pools or spas ❑ child care center
EJ beverage establishment ❑ grocery store
4. .4 ice' D i �� L✓ T .P luo9i��C i'lf�lr/�` Date: / : l Q
/�L�Cd rv�ry ,O.911"T& , Reviewed By: ;l,,�i>'✓�i�'r
(DHD 10/91 rcb. rev. 7/97 Review Sheet
CENTRAL
•• DISTRICT
PTHEALTH
DEPARTMENT MAIN OFFICE - 707 N. ARMSTRONG PL • BOISE, ID 83704-0825 • (203) 375-5211 • FAX 327-8500
To prevent and treat disease and disability; to promote healthy lifestyles; and to protect and promote the health and quality n/'our eundronnurnt.
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that storm water be pre-treated through a grassy swale
prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to ground water and
surface water quality. The engineers and architects involved with the design
of this project should obtain current best management practices for storm
water disposal and design a storm water management system that is
preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals that could
be used for guidance are:
State of Idaho Catalog of Stormwater Best Management Practices For
Idaho Cities and Counties.
Prepared by the Idaho Division of Environmental Quality, July 1997.
Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook.
Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department, January 1997.
Ada / Boise County Office
707 N Armsrong PI.
Boise, ID 83704
Enviro. Health: 327-7499
Family Planning: 327-7400
Immunizations: 327-7450
Senior Nutrition: 327-7460
WIC 327-7488
FAX 327-8500
Serving valley, Elmore, Boise, and Ada Counties
Ada -WIC Satellite Office
1606 Robert St.
Boise. ID 83705
Ph. 334-3355
FAX: 334-3355
Elmore County Office
520 E. 8th Street N.
Mountain Home, ID 83647
Enviro. Health 587-9225
Family Health: 587-4407
WIC: 587-4409
FAX: 587-3521
Valley County Office
703 N 1 st Street
P O Box 1448
McCall, ID 83638
Ph 634-7194
FAX 634-2174
March 2, 2000
Will Berg, City Clerk
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
33 East Idaho
Meridian, ID 83642
Re: CUP -00-017 Resolution Subdivision
Dear Commissioners:
MAR - 6 2000
CITY OF 1'
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-463-0092
Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861
SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District's Hunter Lateral courses along the west
boundary of the proposed project. The District reserves the right to claim what we deem
necessary to operate and maintain the Hunter Lateral. All storm drainage must be
retained on site.
Sincerely,
Bill Henson, Asst. Water Superintendent
NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Cc: File — Shop
File — Office
Water Superintendent
Briggs Engineering, Inc. — Becky Bowcutt
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Ron Anderson
Keith Bird
Tammy deWeerd
Cherie McCandless
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854
MEMORANDUM: March 20, 2000
To: Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council tFCB1VEFJ
From: Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering TechniciaqF�7_ MAR 2 0 2000
Brad Hawkins -Clark, Planner34lC City of Meridian
Christy Richardson, Planner City Clerk Oiiicc:
Re: - Request for a Annexation and Zoning of 16.1 Acres from R -T to C -G by
Overland, L.L.C. (File AZ -00-004)
Rezone of 37.6 Acres from R-4 to L -O by G.L. Voigt (File RZ-00-003)
Preliminary Plat of 107.06 Acres by G.L. Voigt (File PP -00-006)
Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Commercial Development
(RESOLUTION PLAZA) consisting of Multi -Family, Commercial, Office
and LDS Seminary in the proposed L -O and C -G Zones (File CUP -00-017)
- Conditional Use Permit for a 200 Unit Luxury Apartment Complex by Desert
West Properties, L.L.C. (File CUP -00-015)
- Conditional Use Permit for a 86,160 Square Foot Ice Arena by Pat McKeegan
(File CUP -00-016)
We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the
applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by
motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATIONS SUMMARY
There are six (6) separate applications covered in this report, each addressed separately after the
summary. Five of the applications are associated with two parcels and propose a Planned
Commercial Development (PD -C), generally located at the SE corner of Overland and South
Locust Grove Roads. The sixth application (preliminary plat) also includes a 55 -acre parcel to
the south of the PD -C owned by the Meridian School District and site of a future high school.
The PD -C proposed uses include retail, office, an LDS Seminary, a 1,430 -seat ice hockey arena
(two rinks), a daycare and a 200 -unit luxury apartment complex. The annexation application
applies only to the 16 -acre parcel west of the Hunter Lateral. The rezone application applies only
to the 37.64 -acre parcel south of Overland and east of the Hunter.
Since ACHD has not yet submitted a report on the Preliminary Plat or three (3) CUP
applications, Staff is recommending these four (4) applications be continued or tabled.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
Resolution Pla AZ.RZPP.CUP.doc
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Mayor, Council and P&�_
March 20, 2000
Page 2
LOCATION
The property is generally located at the SE corner of Overland Road and South Locust Grove
Road with approximately '/z mile of frontage along Overland. The future high school parcel is
currently land -locked and directly south of the 36 -acre parcel.
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
North — R.V. park, Cesco (John Deere), Transport, Truck & Trailers, future location of Treasure
Valley Music, and two vacant parcels. All are zoned C -G (Meridian).
South — An LDS church is currently being constructed on the Ada County parcel immediately
south of the Overland, LLC parcel fronting on Locust Grove. Rim View Subdivision, zoned R1
in Ada County, is south of the church. Raven Hill and Los Alamitos Subdivision, zoned R4
(Meridian), lie south of the school parcel.
East — Several large, vacant parcels currently in agricultural use are east of the subject parcels.
All are zoned RT (Ada County).
West — Several phases of Sportsman Pointe Subdivision, zoned R4, lies across Locust Grove
Road to the west. There is also an unplatted, triangular shaped parcel at the SW corner of the
intersection that is not in City limits, zoned RT (Ada Co.), with a single family residence.
CURRENT OWNERS OF RECORD
Gary L. Voigt is the property owner of the 37.6 acre parcel. Craig Groves and Greg Johnson
(Overland LLC) are the owners of the 16.1 acre parcel. Meridian Joint School District No. 2 is
the owner of the 55 acre parcel. All owners have submitted consent to be a part of these
applications.
GENERAL COMMENTS/OVERVIEW (All Applications)
1. The 1993 Meridian Comprehensive Plan was amended by Resolution #266 (File CPA -99-
005) for the Voigt and Overland LLC parcels from Single Family Residential to
Mixed/Planned Use Development on 11-16-99 by action of the City Council. Under the
amended Mixed Use designation, the proposed uses are permitted.
2. The applicant has proposed a tentative phasing plan consisting of four levels of priority:
Phase I - Ice Hockey Facility (Construction anticipated in year 2000)
Phase II - Apartment Complex Site `B" (Construction anticipated in year 2001)
Phase III - Office/Retail Site "C" (Schedule dependent on tenant sales)
Phase IV - Commercial/Office Site "A" (Applicant anticipates that this corner will
not develop until the Locust Grove overpass is constructed.)
NOTE: The Final Plat must be recorded prior to issuance of any building permits or Certificates
of Zoning Compliance.
3. The Meridian School District will be a party to the preliminary plat at the City's request. The
Meridian School District does not support nor oppose the Resolution Plaza project. It should
be noted that the School District plans a High School on their 54.99 acre site. Development
of the school site is contingent on a bond issue. The school district has indicated that a bond
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza.AZ.RZ,PRCUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 3
issue for the high school will be submitted for a vote in the fall of 2000. If approved,
construction of the school will take place in 2001.
4. On July 19, 1999, the APA (COMPASS) Board of Directors moved the proposed Locust
Grove/I-84 overpass from the Destination 2020 Plan (soft projection) to the Transportation
Improvement Plan (hard planning document). APA projects a dramatic increase in traffic for
South Locust Grove when the overpass is constructed and they support a transportation
management plan be developed for this project to coordinate the commuter needs of future
residents and employees.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (All Applications)
Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this
project shall be tiled per City Ordinance. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the
site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district,
with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department.
No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project.
2• Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be
removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for non-
domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
3. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with City of Meridian Zoning and
Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements.
4. Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of
Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.
5. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required
and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site
drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site.
6. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any
nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section.
7. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian
Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing
signs will be permitted.
8. Provide five -foot -wide sidewalks in accordance.with City Ordinance.
9. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities
Act.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Pla a.AZ,RZ.PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&�_
March 20, 2000
Page 4
ANNEXATION & ZONING REQUIREMENTS (File AZ -00-004)
1. The legal description submitted in the application appears to meet the requirements of the
City of Meridian and State Tax Commission. The parcel is contiguous to the existing
corporate city limits of Meridian.
2. Staff agrees with the Applicant's forecast that the Overland/Locust Grove area will
become a major intersection, especially with the construction of the I-84/Locust Grove
overpass. Staff also agrees that neighborhood commercial services are needed in this area
to service the existing residential subdivisions and proposed apartment complex
residents. However, we do not support the proposed C -G zone. Staff recommends a
lower -intensity commercial zone Neighborhood Commercial (C N). All of the proposed
uses listed in item #10 of the application (retail,. day care, and office) are permitted either
outright or with a CUP in both the C -N and C -G. But there are several uses permitted in
the C -G that are prohibited in the C -N, including auto repair, service stations, hotels,
truck stops, heavy equipment sales and auto sales lots. Given the previously stated
concerns of the Sportsman Pointe and Los Alamitos residents and the increased number
of children in the apartment complex, Staff feel the down -zoned C -N is a more
appropriate zone and will adequately meet the development intentions of the Applicant.
The subject lots can be adequately served by public facilities, and the proposed uses will
allow for orderly expansion of the city limits.
4. A Development Agreement will be required as a condition of annexation
Annexation Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the annexation but denial of the requested C -G zone. We
recommend C -N zoning.
REZONE REQUIREMENTS (File RZ-00-003)
1. The legal description submitted in the application appears to meet the requirements of the
City of Meridian and State Tax Commission.
2. Staff agrees with the proposed Limited Office (L -O) zone. It is the most appropriate zone
for the proposed mixed uses within the Planned Development.
The subject lot can be adequately served by public facilities, and the proposed uses will
allow for orderly expansion of the city limits.
4. A Development Agreement will be required as a condition of rezone.
Rezone Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the rezone with the requested L -O zone.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ,PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&2,
March 20, 2000
Page 5
PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL COMMENTS (File PP -00-006)
1. Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision
and street names. Make any corrections necessary to conform.
2. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department
3. Assessment fees for water and sewer service are determined during the building plan
review process. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Re -Assessment Agreement
with the City of Meridian for all commercial uses. An assessment agreement is a vehicle
that protects the City of Meridian and the Developer in the event that estimated
assessments are not in line with actual usages. The agreement provides for
reimbursement to the developer for over payment of assessments and payment to the City
of Meridian of any shortfall in assessments. The overpayment/shortfall is determined
after adequate historical usage.
PRLIMINARY PLAT REQUIREMENTS (File PP -00-006)
1. Sanitary sewer service to this site will be via extensions from the Five Mile Trunk that is
currently under construction by this applicant. Applicant will be responsible to construct
the sewer mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to
coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes
are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline.
2. Water service to this site will be via extensions from newly constructed mains under the
interstate, and from extensions of existing mains installed in adjacent developments.
Applicant will be responsible to construct the water mains to and through this proposed
development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public
Works Department. Please provide the Public works department with information on
anticipated fire flow and domestic water requirements for the proposed site. Water
service to this development is contingent upon positive results from a hydraulic analysis
by our computer model. Flow and pressure from the existing mains should be monitored
with the Meridian Water Department.
3. Two -hundred -fifty- and 100 -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at
locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at
subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants.
4. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on
site. Please submit hook-up and design details based on the proposed landscaping. Due
to the size of landscaped area, primary water supply connection to the City's mains will
not be allowed. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water
for the primary source. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall
be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaz AZ,RZ.PP.CUP.doc
r,
Mayor, Council and P&2,
March 20, 2000
Page 6
5. Applicant has not indicated whether the pressurized irrigation system within this
development is to be owned and maintained by an association or the Nampa & Meridian
Irrigation District. If the system is being proposed as a private system, plans and
specifications for the irrigation system shall be reviewed by the Public Works
Department as part of the development planreview process. A draft copy of the
pressurized irrigation system O&M manual must be submitted prior to plan approval. The
City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round
source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the
culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the
developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior
to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. If City water is proposed as
a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire
common open area.
6. Show all existing easements for irrigation/drainage facilities located within the
boundaries of this proposed development (i.e. Hunter Lateral easements).
7. Detailed landscape plans for the Overland Road and Locust Grove Road landscape
frontage buffers and for street landscaping along Millenium Way and Celebration
Avenue shall be submitted for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat
application. This requirement does not include interior lot landscaping. Interior
landscaping will be dealt with on a site by site review basis with future CUP applications.
A letter of credit or cash surety will be required for the improvements prior to signature
on the Final Plat.
8. Staff recommends the Overland and Locust Road landscape buffers be platted as separate
common lots within the subdivision and maintenance be the responsibility of the
Development Committee/Association. The draft CC&Rs submitted with the application
states each separate lot owner in the subdivision will be responsible for construction,
installation and maintenance of landscaping on each building site. By placing
responsibility for the arterial landscape buffers with a single entity (the Association),
greater consistency of design and maintenance may be achieved. At a minimum, the
landscape buffers shall be placed within a permanent landscape easement designated as
such on the plat. No easements are currently shown.
9. Six -foot -high, permanent perimeter fencing shall be required along the eastern boundary
of Lot 1, Block 3, and Lot 2, Block 1, and along the southern boundary of Lot 15 & 16,
Block 1. Submit detailed fencing plans for review and approval with submittal of the
Final Plat. All required fencing is to be in place prior to issuance of building permits.
10. The Applicant is proposing to construct a fence along the east boundary of the Hunter
Lateral. Staff recommends the Lateral be piped and no fence constructed. Given the
close proximity of the proposed 200 unit apartment complex, High School, and Daycare,
staff recommends the applicant be required to comply with Ord. 12-4-13 (Piping of
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc
r
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 7
Ditches). The City required the developers of Raven Hill and Los Alamitos subdivisions
(upstream from subject site) to tile the Hunter and see no reason this site should receive
an exemption from the piping ordinance.
11. Applicant shall provide a vehicular access across the Hunter Lateral from the proposed
apartment complex (Site `B") to the proposed Office/Retail area (Site "A"). The purpose
of this connection is to minimize the vehicular impact on Overland Road and to provide
an internal connection to the Daycare and Retail sites. The Transportation Impact Study
submitted by Dobie Engineering, Inc. assumed 20% of the office and day care traffic
would be captured within the complex. However, this capturing cannot take place unless
an internal access road is provided. If a connection is not provided across the Hunter, an
additional 20% of vehicle trips would be added to Overland Road (based on Dobie's
estimations).
12. Applicant has provided the minimum required 35 feet of landscape buffer along Overland
Road, an entryway corridor. Staff agrees. They show 25 feet of landscape buffer along
Locust Grove Road (including the 5 foot wide detached sidewalk). Since Locust Grove is
not listed as an entryway corridor, Staff supports the 25 -foot buffer width for this arterial.
At a minimum, the Overland Road landscape buffer must be completed from the eastern
property boundary to 30 feet west of Millenium Way prior to issuance of certificate of
occupancy for any building within the subdivision.
13. Applicant is proposing a 30 -foot wide private road (Y2K Lane) to serve Lot 6 and 8,
Block 1. Applicant should explain the purpose for the private classification and whether
or not sidewalks will be provided. All private roads must approved by the City Council.
Staff questions the intent of the private classification, particularly when this will be the
first drive providing access into the site for eastbound traffic on Overland and will likely
be heavily used. If approved, Staff recommends 5 -foot sidewalks be provided on at least
one (1) side of the road.
Preliminary Plat Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions: a) additional
fencing is provided, b) the Hunter Lateral is tiled, c) provide a single vehicular connection across
the Hunter Lateral, and d) landscaping is provided and constructed per item #12. Until the City
receives a copy of the ACHD report, the public hearing should be continued.
CUP (PUD/COMMERCIAL) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-017)
As part of a conditional use permit, the City of Meridian may impose restrictions and
conditions in addition to current City Ordinances.
2. This Conditional Use Permit is for the overall concept only. Future phases of the project
will require separate Conditional Use Permits for each phase and each must substantially
comply with the final approved Concept Plan.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ.PP_CUP.doe
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 8
3. Conceptually (based upon the submitted Overall Preliminary Site Plan dated 2-01-00),
staff believes the project is in accord with the purpose of Planned Developments as
outlined in the Subdivision & Development Ordinance. The mixed residential, office,
recreation and retail uses meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and should
contribute to a reduction in traffic in this area.
4. Planned Development Regulations: As a mixed/planned use development, the Resolution
Plaza development must comply with the following sections of the subdivision
ordinance: 12-6-4 Procedures for Planned Developments, 12-6-6 General Regulations for
Planned Development, and 12-6-7 General Standards for Planned Developments. In
addition, residential areas must comply with 12-6-8-A Design Standards for Planned
Development -Residential. All commercial and office uses must comply with 12-6-8-B
Design Standards for Planned Development -Commercial.
5. Colored Rendering: Colored renderings of the development must be submitted prior to
the City Council meeting to meet the intent of Section 12-6-4 of the PD ordinance.
6. Open Space: All Planned Developments (PD) are required to have at least 10% of the
gross land area of the PD as common open space as 12-6-7-E-5. The total common open
space calculation for Resolution Plaza is shown separately on Sheets 1-3 (Sites "A" —
"C"). Site "A" is 4.53 acres (1.44 required), Site `B" is 5.29 acres (1.45 required), and
Site "C" is 4.10 acres (1.86 required). These calculations include landscape buffers and
islands. Standard practice has been that residential PD's cannot count required buffers
and landscape setbacks toward the 10% open space requirement, but commercial PD's
have been allowed to count it.
Total gross site acreage for the Resolution Plaza project is 47.04 acres (excluding public
rights-of-way). 10% open space would be 4.7 acres. The minimum amount of open space
has been met. All open space delineated as common open space must meet all standards
of 12-6-7-E.
7. Parking: The matrix below summarizes the total off-street parking counts for the
conceptual PD -C:
Site / Use
Parking Proposed
Parking Required
Site "A"
- Retail pads N of first driveway (3)
257
250
- Retail & office pads b/w drivewa s (2)
183
181
- Office & day care pads S of second driveway
189
100 (est.)
Site "A" Total
629
531
Site "B" (Apartment complex)
553*
460 (2.3/d.u.)
Site "C"
- Retail & office pads on Y2K Lane (2)
156
151
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 9
- LDS Seminary 17 20 (est.)
- Office buildings S of Gala St. (2 129 98
- Retail & office buildings N of Gala St. (2) 317 287
-Ice Arena 278 286 (1/5 seats
*The Applicant is proposing 152 tandem parking spaces for the complex. The P&Z
Commission discouraged tandem parking for a proposed apartment complex of similar
size in October 1999 (Valerie Heights). If the tandem parking is subtracted from the total
parking spaces, their total provided would be 401 spaces.
On the Site "A" plan, a row of parking is proposed along the south edge of the north
driveway and along both the north and south edges of the south driveway with no
separation. Given the likelihood of these private driveways receiving high volumes of
traffic at build -out (functioning more as public roads), Staff feels this design would be
unsafe and should be relocated. The first parking stalls are less than 40 feet from the
property line and vehicles backing out of the stalls into the drive aisle will likely be a
hazard for vehicles entering the site off Locust Grove.
The proposed Ice Arena seats a total of 1,430 people. Technically, the Applicant meets
City ordinance, which is based on one stall for every 5 seats. If one assumes the arena
will utilize the parking north of Gala Street for evening events, an additional 317 stalls
could feasibly be added to serve the arena, providing a total of 595 stalls. The Applicant
should provide more detail on the hours of operation for the ice arena and their
experience with other similar venues and whether or not both rinks will be used
simultaneously.
8. Parking Lot Landscaping: Landscape islands serving a single row of parking shall have
one tree. Islands serving a double row of parking shall have two trees. A minimum of
one 3" caliper tree per 1500 square feet of asphalt (including driveways connecting from
the loop road) is required per City Ordinance.
9. Streets and Circulation: Staff agrees with the proposed stub road (Gala Street) to the east,
unplatted property. As stated in the Preliminary Plat comments, we recommend access be
provided internally with a connection between Sites "A" and `B". There is a conflict
between the Concept Plan and Plat for the Seminary site. The plat proposes a flag lot for
Lot 4, Block 1 (the proposed 19,648 s.f. office building), with the flag serving as the
driveway. However, the Concept Plan shows the seminary utilizing the flag driveway, not
the office. Staff does not disagree with the design, but it should be noted for future cross
access agreements.
10. Signage: The Applicant submitted a letter from Idaho Electric Signs regarding signage
for the apartment complex and a letter from Patrick McKeegan outlining intent for the ice
arena signage. The monument signs shall not exceed 70 s.f. All signage throughout the
PD -C shall be coordinated and complement building materials and themes. This applies
to all future buildings.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 10
11. Storage Areas: Per Ordinance 12-6-8.A.1, Storage areas shall be provided for the
anticipated needs of boats, campers, motorhomes, and trailers. No such areas are
designated on the Site Plan. Applicant shall either provide a storage area adequate to
serve every two (2) living units or provide evidence that storage needs can be met
through an alternative method.
12. Maintenance Building: A maintenance building or approved area shall be provided that is
suitable for the services required for the repair and maintenance of all common areas as
per Section 9-607.H.3.
13. Trash Enclosures: No trash enclosures are shown on the Conceptual Site Plan. Staff
recommends all such areas be situated outside of view from either Overland or Locust
Grove Roads. Applicant shall coordinate locations and construction requirements of the
required trash enclosures with Meridian Sanitary Service, Inc., and provide a letter of
approval from their office when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance.
14. Hours of Operation: No details of hours of operation are provided. For the future CUP
applications, all office and retail uses should be harmonious with the apartment complex
and residential homes to the west.
15. Alternative Transportation Options: At build -out, this site will serve as a principal center
of employment for the east Meridian/west Boise area. While Boise Urban Stages does not
currently service Overland Road, it has the potential to be a likely destination point for
mass transit in the future. Staff strongly recommends an area be designated and/or
preserved on the Concept Plan for a future bus stop. We also recommend the inclusion of
bicycle racks at all office and retail buildings and the ice hockey arena.
16. All conditions placed on this application shall run with the land and shall not lapse or be
waived as the result of any change in tenancy or ownership of any or all of the lands
governed by this CUP application. All such conditions shall be deemed the requirements
for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any use or structure as per City
Ordinance.
17. Applicant shall utilize the Ada County Highway District design standards for the private
street within this development, with the exception of width requirements. Street designs
shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Meridian Public Works Department.
PD -C Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the concept plan with the above conditions. The hearing should be
continued until ACHD submits a report.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plam.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 11
CUP (APARTMENT COMPLEX) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-017)
1. All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site "B" (apartment complex)
shall be incorporated here.
2. The Applicant is proposing to construct the complex in two (2) phases, with the first phase
consisting of approximately 140 units and the clubhouse. Staff recommends the number of
units constructed in phase 1 be limited to a maximum of thirty (30) dwelling units and that no
more units be granted occupancy until Overland Road capacity is improved.
Overland Road between Locust Grove and Eagle Road is currently a two-lane, non -
signalized arterial. Numerous traffic concerns have been entered into the public record
regarding the capacity of both Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. Traffic was cited as
one of the principal reasons for the City's denial of the proposed Sundance Apartments at the
NW corner of Locust Grove Road and Overland Road last Fall. Dobie Engineering's traffic
study lists Overland Road (east of Locust Grove Road) as having 11,230 vehicles/day in
7/98. Over the past twenty (20) months, this figure has certainly increased; especially
factoring in the new homes built in Sherbrooke Hollows to the south. Dobie's study estimates
1,170 new trips/day to be generated by the apartment complex and 335 new trips/day
generated by the ice arena. The study also projects a Level of Service "F" for the left -turn
outs from all three Overland Road driveways until signals are installed. The study further
assumes the high school, potentially slated for construction in 2001 (which is the same year
as the apartment complex), will generate 3,000 trips/day and 250 peak hour trips.
Overland Road is designated in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as a 5 -lane
arterial with bike lanes to be constructed in 2005. Staff believes that limiting new
development on the subject site, to the Ice Arena and thirty (30) apartments would facilitate a
smoother transition for the neighborhoods and ease the impact on Overland Road until such
time as it is widened and signalized.
3. All applicable Fair Housing and ADA requirements for multi -family housing must be met,
including accessibility design for the ground floor units. Handicap parking shall be provided
to serve the Clubhouse.
CUP (Apartments) Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the condition that only the
clubhouse and thirty (30) dwelling units receive occupancy until Overland Road is improved.
The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report.
CUP ("THE POND" ICE ARENA) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-015)
All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site "C" (ice arena) shall be
incorporated here.
2. A minimum of seven (7) handicap accessible spaces must be provided to directly serve this
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaz .AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z r`
March 20, 2000
Page 12
facility. Only two (2) are shown. Revise site plan accordingly.
CUP (Ice Arena) Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The hearing should be continued until
ACHD submits a report.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS
The 1993 Comprehensive Plan contains a variety of goals and policies relevant to this
application. The following sections most directly apply to the proposed project and are repeated
here for the Council and Commission's consideration during the hearing process.
Goal 3 is "to encourage the kind of economic growth and development which supplies
employment and economic self-sufficiency for existing and future residents, reduces the present
reliance on Boise and strengthens the City's ability to finance and implement public
improvements, services, and its open space character."
Goal 4 is "to provide housing opportunities for all economic groups within the community."
Goal 8 is "to establish compatible and efficient use of land through the use of innovative and
functional site design."
Economic Development
1.1 The City of Meridian shall make every effort to create a positive atmosphere that
encourages... commercial enterprises to locate in Meridian.
1.3 The character, site improvements and type of new commercial or industrial developments
should be harmonized with the natural environment and respect the unique needs and
features of each area.
Land Use
I AU Encourage new development that reinforces the City's present development pattern of
higher density development within the Old Town area and lower density development in
outlying areas.
1.8U Promote the development of high-quality and environmentally compatible residential
areas that contain the necessary parks, schools and commercial facilities to maintain and
form identifiable neighborhoods.
2.1 U Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi -family,
townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the
City with a range of affordable housing opportunities.
2.2U Support strategies for the development of neighborhood parks within all residential areas.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Pl=.AZ.RZ.PP,CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&2,
March 20, 2000
Page 13
2.3U Protect and maintain residential neighborhood property values, improve each
neighborhood's physical condition and enhance its quality of life for residents.
4.8U Encourage commercial uses, offices and medical -care uses to locate in the Old Town
district, business parks, shopping centers and near high-intensity activity areas, such as
freeway interchanges.
6.8U New urban density subdivisions which abut or are proximal to existing rural residential
land uses shall provide screening and transitional densities with larger, more comparable
lot sizes to buffer the interface between the urban level densities and rural residential
densities.
Transportation
1.4U Monitor and coordinate the compatibility of theland use and transportation system.
1.20U Encourage proper design of residential neighborhoods to ensure their safety and
tranquility.
Open Space Parks and Recreation
2.5U New subdivision development... will be considered as opportunities to ... encourage the
development of recreational open spaces and parks as part of new planned developments.
Housing
1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide diversity of housing types ... in a
variety of locations suitable for residential development.
1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping
centers shall be encouraged.
1.6 Housing proposals shall be phased with transportation, open space and public service and
facility plans, which will maximize benefits to the residents, minimize conflicts and
provide a tie-in between new residential areas and service needs.
1.19 High-density development, where possible, should be located near open space corridors
or other permanent major open space and park facilities, and near major access
thoroughfares.
Community Desian
5.2 Ensure that all new development enhances rather than detracts from the visual quality of
its surroundings, especially in areas of prominent visibility.
6.5U Establish land -use designations that reflect the character of existing neighborhoods.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza.AZ,RZ.PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 14
6.11 U Promote well-planned and well -designated affordable housing in all Meridian
neighborhoods.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plan, AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doe
BROGS E�`'G/NEFR/NG, /nom --
ENGINEERS / PLMwERs / suRvEyms
March 22, 2000
Mr. Brad Hawkins -Clark
Mr. Bruce Freckleton
City of Meridian
200 E. Carlton, Suite 201
Meridian, Idaho 8.3642
1800 West Overland Road
Boise, Idaho 83705 — 3142
Voice (208) 344-9700
Fax (208) 345-2950
E-mail briggs@micron.net
C_`,T-N.17_� �
;BAR 2 2 200a
CITY OF
Re: Resolution Plaza (Annexation, Rezone, Preliminary Plat, PUD & Conditional Use Applications)
Dear Brad and Bruce:
This letter is in response to staff comments dated March 20, 2000
General Comments :
1. We are in agreement.
2. The phasing information is correct.
3. The School District information is correct.
4. We would like more detailed information on transportation management plans.
General Requirements :
l . Internal irrigation and drainage ditches will be piped. The Hunter Lateral adjoining the west
boundary of the Voigt property will be piped. The section of the adjoining Hunter Lateral
which abuts the Meridian School District property will be the responsibility of the District if
piping is required for Lot 1, Block 1.
2. A septic system and two wells presently exist on the property. The septic system and residential
well will be removed per City Ordinance. The Second well wns used for agricultural purposes.
We are exploring the possible use of the well as a secondary pressure irrigation source.
3. The applicant will comply.
4. The applicant wi I I comply.
5. The applicant will provide a drainage plan. A drainage ditch traverses the subject property. The
ditch receives nun -off from the property. We may explore approval to discharge; the pre -
development (low.
6. The applicant wi 11 comply.
7. The applicant will comply.
A. The applicant will comply.
9. The applicant will comply.
0 10 1 \CityMcr Hawkins -Clark Response. Irr
MAR 22 '00 12:24
12083452950 PAGE.02
Annexation and Zoning Requirements: (File AZ -00-004)
1. Acceptable.
2. Staffs recommendation for Neighborhood Commercial (CN) zoning is acceptable since the
anticipated uses would be allowed within the CN designation.
3. We are in agreement.
4. The applicant will comply and enter into a development agreement.
Rezone Requirements :(File R2-00-003)
1. We are in agreement.
2. We are in agreement.
3. We are in agreement.
4. The applicant will comply and enter into a development agreement.
Preliminary Plat General Comments: (File PP -00-006)
1. The subdivision name Resolution Subdivision has been approved by the Ada County Engineer.
The Street Name Committee has reviewed the proposed street name and has issued an
evaluation and approval.
2. The applicant will comply.
3. The applicant will comply.
Preliminary Plat Requirements: (File PP -00-006)
1. The applicant will comply.
2. The applicant will comply.
3. The applicant will comply.
4. The applicant will provide pressure irrigation to all lots with the exception of' Lot 1,
Block 1 (Meridian School District lot). We have contacted the School District concerning
participation in a joint pump station. However, if the District believes financial
participation is premature, since their irrigation needs are unknown at this time. We will
proceed with an independent station.
5. The applicant intends to design and construct the pressure irrigation facilities to Nampa
Meridian Irrigation District Standards. The system will be owned and maintained by
Nampa Meridian Irrigation District with approval by the District Board.
Am agricultural well exists on the G. L. Voigt parcel. The well was historically used for a
dairy. We intend to utilise the well as a secondary source if -approval from Tdaho
Department of Water Resources can be obtained.
6. 'The applicant will delineate the NMID casement for the Hunter Lateral on the plat. No
other irrigation easements exist on the subject properties.
7. The applicant will comply.
8. The applicant intends to provide landscape easements along Locust Grove and
Overland Roads. An association will be formed to govern perimeter landscaping.
9. The applicant will comply.
0101\CityMer Hawkins -Clark Response.ltr
MAR 22 '00 12:25
12083452950 PAGE.03
10. The developer of the apartment complex believes a fence along their western
boundary is necessary as a buffer and for security purposes. Interconnection can be
accomplished with pedestrian pathways and (1) vehicular connection as requested
in Condition No. 11.
The applicant will pipe the Hunter Lateral as requested by staff.
11. A vehicular connection between Site A & B could be accomplished from the driveway
between building 7 & 8. if the daycare building size were reduced and the driveway
angles north to interseet.just above the traffic circle.
12. The applicant will comply.
13. The private road functions as a joint private access between Lot 8 & 6, Block 1 and
Millennium Way. This access could be accomplished with an easement or cross
access agreement for a driveway. The applicant did not intend the driveway to be
constructed with curbs, gutter and sidewalk.
CUP (PUD/Commercial) Requirements• (File CUP -00-017)
1. The applicant understands.
2. The applicant understands the approval is conceptual and future uses will require site
specific conditional use approval. The staff and commission must understand the term
conceptual. Final development plans will most likely reflect minor deviations from the
concept.
I The applicant is in agreement.
4. The applicant will comply with the requirements of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance as
follows: Sections 12-6-4, 12-6-6, 12-6-7 & 12-6-8-B.
The applicant disagrees with the requirements of Section 12-6-8-A (1, 2 & 3).
(1) The multi -family project applicant indicates the parking of any type of
recreational vehicle will be prohibited. Any resident with RV's will need to store the
vehicles at a public storage facility offsite. Therefore, there is no necessity to provide
a storage area.
(2) The applicant opposes the recommendation to provide one additional parking
space for every three dwelling units in addition to the required 2 spaces per dweling
unit. This section is not a mandate since it refers to the word "may" not shall or
should. The applicant for the apartment complex hits provided two (2) parking
spaces per dwelling unit as specified in Section 11-13-15-B of the Meridian
Ordinance. The standard of two spaces per unit is universal in most jurisdictions.
The applicant has also provided attached garages which enhances the aesthetics of
the project with less hard surface areas. Driveways (tandem parking) to the garages
provides additional parking for guests.
(3) No maintenance building is proposed with the multi -family or commercial
project. The applicants intend to contract with a landscape company for
maintenance of common areas and landscaping. Therefore, this requirement should
0101\CityMer Hawkins -Clark Response.ltr
MAR 22 '00 12:25
12083452950 PAGE.04
be deleted.
S. A colored site/landscape plan and multiple colored elevations of proposed structures
was submitted with the applications. The applicants will need specifics concerning
additional information required under Section 12-6-4. It is the applicant', belief
that Section 12-6-4 has been satisfied.
6. the applicant is in agreement.
7. The applicant disagrees with the parking requirement of Site B (Apartment
Complex). Staff indicates a requirement of 2.3 spaces/dwelling unit. The Ordinance
mandates (2) spaces/du. Staff has never required parking in excess of on any
previous applications processed by Briggs Engineering. I believe this
recommendation is excessive and adds to paved areas at the expense of
landscaping/common areas. The Ordinance does not mandate anything beyond (2)
spaces/unit. The parking required condition should be revised to reflect "400". The
Apartment Complex was designed with 401 parking spaces (garages and open
parking) to meet the Ordinance requirement of 2 spaces/unit. The tandem parking
(driveways in front of attached garages) was considered excess, yet was referenced
on the site plan.
Mr. McKeegan, the architect for the lee Arena believes the parking provided (278
spaces) will be under utilized most of the time. (Sec Mr. McKeegan's letter
attached.)
Customers of the rink will have the ability to park in adjoining lots during heavy
peak hours for the rink. We believe a minor amount of over—flow parking is
reasonable. Please refer to the letter from Patrick McKeegan dated March 21, 2000
for additional information on the Ice Arena's parking needs and hours of operation.
The applicant will revise the site plan and remove the three rows of parking stalls
which back directly into the access driveways on Site A.
S. The applicant will comply with landscaping requirements for parking lots.
9. The applicant is in agreement and will delineate the necessary cross access easements on
the final plat for lots which may share private access driveways.
10. The applicant will comply.
11. The applicant for the Apartment Complex will prohibit the parking of recreational
vehicles within the complex.
12. The maintenance of common areas will be contracted with a lawn care company.
Therefore, there is no practical need for a maintenance building for any of the
proposed developments.
1 ). A site plan was sent to Meridian Sanitary Services for their review and comment. A
meeting has been scheduled with Bill Gregory. Meridian Sanitary Services on March 22.
2000 to obtain recommendations for trash enclosure locations. The applicant will comply.
14. See letter from Patrick McKeegan concerning hours of operation for the Ice Arena.
We agree that hours of operation are important in order to coexist with existing
residential development and the proposed multi -family development.
15. An easement for a possible future bus stop could be provided on the plat.
0101\CityMer Hawkins -Clark Response.ltr
MAR 22 '00 12:26
12083452950 PAGE.05
issvva /NEER/ inc. 1800 W. Ove n Road - iio�se iaano a:siu5 - pub :�aa-a
tO
The inclusion ofbicycle racks within the development is acceptable.
16. The applicant is in agreement.
17. The applicant proposes the Y2K Lane as a private driveway. The applicant does not
intend to construct this as a public street with curb, gutter and sidewalk
CUP (Apartment Complex) Requirements: (File CUP -00-017)
I. The applicant agrees, with the exception of those conditions which we have documented
our opposition.
2. The applicant disagrees with the limitation of the apartment complex to 30 units. it is not
economically feasible to construct the necessary infrastructure (Le. clubhouse, pool,
sewer, water, roadways & parking) to accommodate 30 units: (See letter from Desert
West, LLC.)
It is our desire to encourage ACIID to consider a private/public effort to improve Overland
Road.
3. The applicant will comply with ADA requirements.
CUP ("The Pond" Ice Arena) Requirements: (bile CUP -00-015)
I. The applicant agrees with the exception of those conditions which we have documented
opposition.
2. The applicant will comply. (See Patrick McKeegan's letter dated March 21. 2000.)
Sincerely,
BRIG S ENGINES G, i
Becky L. BOwcutt
I.and Use Planner
BLB:fc
0101\CityMer Hawkins -Clark Response.ltr
MAR 22 '00 12:26
12083452950 PAGE.06
Ph,, ick
WKeegan
Architects
419 S. 8m Street, Suite B
Boise, Idaho 83702-7157
206.424.8608 Fax 208.424.8609
www.mckeeganarch.com
March 21, 2004
Becky Bowcutt
Bnggs Engineering
1800 W. Overland road
Boise, ID 83705
Re: Pond Ice Arena CUP Report Response
Project No. 99052
Dear Becky,
I have reviewed Meridian's comments and am pleased with the positive response. My response
to their comments on the Ice Facility follows. For clarity I have indicated the City's page and
Paragraph number.
Page 3, Item 4: Transportation Management Plan. We support the concept and would
participate in a development wide plan.
Page 3, Item 5: Drainage. Will there be a development wide drainage plan or will we be
required to maintain all drainage on our parcel? Our civil engineer has indicated that we can
accommodate our drainage runoff on our parcel.
Page 4, Item 2: C -N zoning. I assume that since staff has not stated the Ice Rink use is not
allowed in the GN zoning that it is. We have no problem with the designation for our use.
Page 5, Item 4 and Page 8 Item 5: Pressurized irrigation system. Will this be a development
wide system or will each parcel be responsible for its needs?
Page 5, Item 9: Perimeter fencing, Will the fencing be installed by the development or are we
responsible for the portion abutting our proposed lot?
Page 7 Item 2. Conceptual approval only. It was Mr. Smith's understanding that our application
was for CU approval of our project also. When is the earliest we could apply for our CU?
Page 8, Item 5. Colored rendering. I thought we furnished one with our previous package to
you. I have enclosed another for this submission.
IAP- i —ntin 15:45 208 424 8509
P.01
MAR 22 '00 12:27
12083452950 PAGE.07
Page 9, Item 7: Additional detail on operations. Mr. Smith has conducted focus groups to
determine the feasibility for this facility and what the communities needs are for ice related
recreation. He is also actively involved in the local recreational hockey leagues. Much of the
information is proprietary business information but I can summarized our plans as follows:
There is a need in the area for additional ice facilities. Ice World is currently running at full
capacity and cannot support the current need or anticipated growth in hockey. Many of the
adult participants work non-traditional hours because of the nature of the major employers
(Micron, HP, etc.) running multiple shifts. There is a need for a facility that will provide around
the clock Ice facilities.
Our facility will be open 24 hours but except for a few peak periods during the day will not
require anywhere near the parking that is being requested. For example if both sheets were
being used by four teams there would be approximately 64 persons on the ice. During open
recreational skating there might be as many as 100 persons on one or both sheets. Open
recreational skating will be scheduled after school and during the early evenings when the
sheets are not scheduled for practice. The majority of the time the ice will be scheduled by
teams (16 players plus coaches) for practice on a rotating basis.
We anticipate once a month having tournaments or other events that would require the full
parking count. These would usually occur during the weekend or evenings when the office
parking would not be used. We believe the parking we have provided will be underutilized most
of the time and that the shared use for the additional 8 seats is reasonable. We had hoped the
City would allow more shared parking so the total development parking lots would not need to
be so large.
Page 10, Item 15: Bicycle racks. They will be provided at our facility.
Page 11, Item 2: HC parking spaces. 5 additional HC parking spaces will be designated.
If you have any questions, or need more information, please call.
Sincerely.
Patrick McKeegan Architects
/Patrick Mc gan
Principal Architect
MAR -21-2000 15=46 208 424 8609 P.22
MAR 22 '00 12:27
12083452950 PAGE.08
Desert West Properties, LLC
3/21/00
Planning & Zoning Commission / Mayor & City Council
City of Meridian
33 East Idaho
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Re: Cotmncnts on the submittal review comments for the 200 unit Luxury Apartment
Complex by Desert West Properties, LLC
Dear, Commission and council
With regard to conditions proposed m the March 20'h 2000 review of our application for a
Conditional Use Permit (File CUP -00-015) We would like to address the items that
pertain to the 200 Unit Luxury Apartment complex.
Preliminary Plat Requirements (File PP -00-006)
Item 10: It is the preference of the applicant to pipe the hunter lateral as well as construct
the 6' fence. It is our opinion that the perimeter fence is necessary to maintain the level of
security and cleanliness that our clientele will expect from a facility of this caliber. We
ask the City council to allow us to provide this important amenity. Thant: you,
Item 11: The applicant would be agreeable to this condition provided that we are able to
limit the traffic into the complex to residents only, thereby protecting the project from
drive threw traffic that would be detrimental to the peace and tranquility of our secured
environment.
CUP (PUD/Commercial) Requirements (File CUP -00-017)
Item 7: The applicant believes that there has been an error in the calculation of the
required parking. When the tandem parking spaces are deducted from the total of the
proposed parking, 401 spaces remain. It is our understanding that there are 2 stalls
required for each of the 200 units equaling 400 stalls.
Item 8: It is our intent to comply with this request fully.
Item 11: It is the intent of the applicant to restrict parking to automobiles and light duty
trucks able to fit into one stall. Storage of boats, campers, motorhomes, trailers and
vehicles that are inoperable or not used regularly will not be allowed and the ow -rim- will
be required to secure suitable storage elsewhere.
MAF 22-2000 2088969527 r.._ P.e2
MAR 22 '00 12.28 12083452950 PAGE.09
Item 12: The applicant will be subcorrtracting maintenance and grounds keeping to a
qualified professional.
Item 13: the applicant intends to conform to this request in full.
CLIP (Apartment Complex) requirements (File CLIP -00-017)
Item 2: The applicant has concluded that it is not economically feasible to limit the
number of units that can be buih in phase 1, and requests that the council delete such a
requirement, as it would interfere with the ability of the business to be profitable. We arc
aware of the traffic problem on Overland road, however, it is our belief that by
developing flus site fully and paying the ACRD impact fees we will be closer to funding
the expansion than if development is drawn out and funding is not as available. In
addition, the 31-170 trips per day estimated by Dobie Engineering is somewhat
insignificant when compared to the traffic generated by the High school and other
commercial enterprises.
We appreciate responsibility that you bear and thank you for the service you render in
behalf of this community.
Sincerely,
The Principles of Desert West Property LLC
tkscrt Wclr PmPomcs. LLC, PO Dox 1030 Merndiai. Idaho 83642
(208) 898-0800 Fv.. (208) 898.9527
MAR -22-2000 08:33 _�_ `898G52 % 93.%: f c ,
MAR 22 '00 12:28 TOTAL P.10
12083452950 PAGE.10
-{ EWG1NEERING \ _
C I . BRIGGS
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
TO
COMPANY
FAX • .� •
DATE 3 - �f'Z- 6z)
NO. OF PAGES SENT
(Including Transmittal)
REFERENCE
REMARKS
REPLY REQUESTED
COPY I �* p
FROM
C�o-LOD
BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC
1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD
BOISE, IDAHO 83705
FAX (208) 345-2950 * TEL (208) 344-9700
(BEI) PROJECT NO. bio t
1800 W. OVERLAND ROAD * BOISE, IDAHO 83705 * (208)344-9700
FAX (208)345-29,r
MAR 22 '00 12:24
12083452950 PAGE.01
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Ron Anderson
Keith Bird
Tammy deWeerd
Cherie McCandless
!1 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY �
A Good Place to Live
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854
MEMORANDUM: March 20, 2000
To: Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council �,EC B1VEFJ
From: Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Technician MAR L o 2000
Brad Hawkins -Clark, Planner3aC City of Meridian
Christy Richardson, Planner City Clerk Office
Re: - Request for a Annexation and Zoning of 16.1 Acres from R -T to C -G by
Overland, L.L.C. (File AZ -00-004)
Rezone of 37.6 Acres from R-4 to L -O by G.L. Voigt (File RZ-00-003)
Preliminary Plat of 107.06 Acres by G.L. Voigt (File PP -00-006)
Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Commercial Development
(RESOLUTION PLAZA) consisting of Multi -Family, Commercial, Office
and LDS Seminary in the proposed L -O and C -G Zones (File CUP -00-017)
- Conditional Use Permit for a 200 Unit Luxury Apartment Complex by Desert
West Properties, L.L.C. (File CUP -00-015)
- Conditional Use Permit for a 86,160 Square Foot Ice Arena by Pat McKeegan
(File CUP -00-016)
We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the
applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by
motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATIONS SUMMARY
There are six (6) separate applications covered in this report, each addressed separately after the
summary. Five of the applications are associated with two parcels and propose a Planned
Commercial Development (PD -C), generally located at the SE corner of Overland and South
Locust Grove Roads. The sixth application (preliminary plat) also includes a 55 -acre parcel to
the south of the PD -C owned by the Meridian School District and site of a future high school.
The PD -C proposed uses include retail, office, an LDS Seminary, a 1,430 -seat ice hockey arena
(two rinks), a daycare and a 200 -unit luxury apartment complex. The annexation application
applies only to the 16 -acre parcel west of the Hunter Lateral. The rezone application applies only
to the 37.64 -acre parcel south of Overland and east of the Hunter.
Since ACHD has not yet submitted a report on the Preliminary Plat or three (3) CUP
applications, Staff is recommending these four (4) applications be continued or tabled.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
Resolution Pla a.AZ.RZTRCUP.doc
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Mayor, Council and P&/10-1
March 20, 2000
Page 2
LOCATION
The property is generally located at the SE corner of Overland Road and South Locust Grove
Road with approximately '/2 mile of frontage along Overland. The future high school parcel is
currently land -locked and directly south of the 36 -acre parcel.
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
North — R.V. park, Cesco (John Deere), Transport, Truck & Trailers, future location of Treasure
Valley Music, and two vacant parcels. All are zoned C -G (Meridian).
South — An LDS church is currently being constructed on the Ada County parcel immediately
south of the Overland, LLC parcel fronting on Locust Grove. Rim View Subdivision, zoned R1
in Ada County, is south of the church. Raven Hill and Los Alamitos Subdivision, zoned R4
(Meridian), lie south of the school parcel.
East — Several large, vacant parcels currently in agricultural use are east of the subject parcels.
All are zoned RT (Ada County).
West — Several phases of Sportsman Pointe Subdivision, zoned R4, lies across Locust Grove
Road to the west. There is also an unplatted, triangular shaped parcel at the SW corner of the
intersection that is not in City limits, zoned RT (Ada Co.), with a single family residence.
CURRENT OWNERS OF RECORD
Gary L. Voigt is the property owner of the 37.6 acre parcel. Craig Groves and Greg Johnson
(Overland LLC) are the owners of the 16.1 acre parcel. Meridian Joint School District No. 2 is
the owner of the 55 acre parcel. All owners have submitted consent to be a part of these
applications.
GENERAL COMMENTS/OVERVIEW (All Applications)
1. The 1993 Meridian Comprehensive Plan was amended by Resolution #266 (File CPA -99-
005) for the Voigt and Overland LLC parcels from Single Family Residential to
Mixed/Planned Use Development on I1-16-99 by action of the City Council. Under the
amended Mixed Use designation, the proposed uses are permitted.
2. The applicant has proposed a tentative phasing plan consisting of four levels of priority:
Phase I - Ice Hockey Facility (Construction anticipated in year 2000)
Phase II - Apartment Complex Site "B" (Construction anticipated in year 2001)
Phase III - Office/Retail Site "C" (Schedule dependent on tenant sales)
Phase IV - Commercial/Office Site "A" (Applicant anticipates that this corner will
not develop until the Locust Grove overpass is constructed.)
NOTE: The Final Plat must be recorded prior to issuance of any building permits or Certificates
of Zoning Compliance.
3. The Meridian School District will be a party to the preliminary plat at the City's request. The
Meridian School District does not support nor oppose the Resolution Plaza project. It should
be noted that the School District plans a High School on their 54.99 acre site. Development
of the school site is contingent on a bond issue. The school district has indicated that a bond
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plm.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&:�'
March 20, 2000
Page 3
issue for the high school will be submitted for a vote in the fall of 2000. If approved,
construction of the school will take place in 2001.
4. On July 19, 1999, the APA (COMPASS) Board of Directors moved the proposed Locust
Grove/I-84 overpass from the Destination 2020 Plan (soft projection) to the Transportation
Improvement Plan (hard planning document). APA projects a dramatic increase in traffic for
South Locust Grove when the overpass is constructed and they support a transportation
management plan be developed for this project to coordinate the commuter needs of future
residents and employees.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (All Applications)
1. Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this
project shall be tiled per City Ordinance. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the
site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district,
with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department.
No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project.
2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be
removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for non-
domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation.
3. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with City of Meridian Zoning and
Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements.
4. Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of
Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.
5. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required
and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site
drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site.
6. Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any
nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section.
7. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian
Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing
signs will be permitted.
8. Provide five -foot -wide sidewalks in accordance.with City Ordinance.
9. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities
Act.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ,RZ.PP,CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&'.."
March 20, 2000
Page 4
ANNEXATION & ZONING REQUIREMENTS (File AZ -00-004)
The legal description submitted in the application appears to meet the requirements of the
City of Meridian and State Tax Commission. The parcel is contiguous to the existing
corporate city limits of Meridian.
2. Staff agrees with the Applicant's forecast that the Overland/Locust Grove area will
become a major intersection, especially with the construction of the I-84/Locust Grove
overpass. Staff also agrees that neighborhood commercial services are needed in this area
to service the existing residential subdivisions and proposed apartment complex
residents. However, we do not support the proposed C -G zone. Staff recommends a
lower -intensity commercial zone Neighborhood Commercial (C N). All of the proposed
uses listed in item #10 of the application (retail,, day care, and office) are permitted either
outright or with a CUP in both the C -N and C -G. But there are several uses permitted in
the C -G that are prohibited in the C -N, including auto repair, service stations, hotels,
truck stops, heavy equipment sales and auto sales lots. Given the previously stated
concerns of the Sportsman Pointe and Los Alamitos residents and the increased number
of children in the apartment complex, Staff feel the down -zoned C -N is a more
appropriate zone and will adequately meet the development intentions of the Applicant.
3. The subject lots can be adequately served by public facilities, and the proposed uses will
allow for orderly expansion of the city limits.
4. A Development Agreement will be required as a condition of annexation
Annexation Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the annexation but denial of the requested C -G zone. We
recommend C -N zoning.
REZONE REQUIREMENTS (File RZ-00-003)
The legal description submitted in the application appears to meet the requirements of the
City of Meridian and State Tax Commission.
2. Staff agrees with the proposed Limited Office (L -O) zone. It is the most appropriate zone
for the proposed mixed uses within the Planned Development.
3. The subject lot can be adequately served by public facilities, and the proposed uses will
allow for orderly expansion of the city limits.
4. A Development Agreement will be required as a condition of rezone.
Rezone Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the rezone with the requested L -O zone.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ,PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&�
March 20, 2000
Page 5
PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL COMMENTS (File PP -00-006)
1. Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision
and street names. Make any corrections necessary to conform.
2. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department.
3. Assessment fees for water and sewer service are determined during the building plan
review process. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Re -Assessment Agreement
with the City of Meridian for all commercial uses. An assessment agreement is a vehicle
that protects the City of Meridian and the Developer in the event that estimated
assessments are not in line with actual usages. The agreement provides for
reimbursement to the developer for over payment of assessments and payment to the City
of Meridian of any shortfall in assessments. The overpayment/shortfall is determined
after adequate historical usage.
PRLIMINARY PLAT REQUIREMENTS (File PP -00-006)
1. Sanitary sewer service to this site will be via extensions from the Five Mile Trunk that is
currently under construction by this applicant. Applicant will be responsible to construct
the sewer mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to
coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes
are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline.
2. Water service to this site will be via extensions from newly constructed mains under the
interstate, and from extensions of existing mains installed in adjacent developments.
Applicant will be responsible to construct the water mains to and through this proposed
development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public
Works Department. Please provide the Public works department with information on
anticipated fire flow and domestic water requirements for the proposed site. Water
service to this development is contingent upon positive results from a hydraulic analysis
by our computer model. Flow and pressure from the existing mains should be monitored
with the Meridian Water Department.
3. Two -hundred -fifty- and 100 -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at
locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at
subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants.
4. Underground year-round pressurized irrigation must be provided to all landscape areas on
site. Please submit hook-up and design details based on the proposed landscaping. Due
to the size of landscaped area, primary water supply connection to the City's mains will
not be allowed. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water
for the primary source. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall
be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ.PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&'1
March 20, 2000
Page 6
5. Applicant has not indicated whether the pressurized irrigation system within this
development is to be owned and maintained by an association or the Nampa & Meridian
Irrigation District. If the system is being proposed as a private system, plans and
specifications for the irrigation system shall be reviewed by the Public Works
Department as part of the development plan. review process. A draft copy of the
pressurized irrigation system O&M manual must be submitted prior to plan approval. The
City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round
source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the
culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the
developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior
to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. If City water is proposed as
a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire
common open area.
6. Show all existing easements for irrigation/drainage facilities located within the
boundaries of this proposed development (i.e. Hunter Lateral easements).
7. Detailed landscape plans for the Overland Road and Locust Grove Road landscape
frontage buffers and for street landscaping along Millenium Way and Celebration
Avenue shall be submitted for review and approval with submittal of the Final Plat
application. This requirement does not include interior lot landscaping. Interior
landscaping will be dealt with on a site by site review basis with future CUP applications.
A letter of credit or cash surety will be required for the improvements prior to signature
on the Final Plat.
8. Staff recommends the Overland and Locust Road landscape buffers be platted as separate
common lots within the subdivision and maintenance be the responsibility of the
Development Committee/Association. The draft CC&Rs submitted with the application
states each separate lot owner in the subdivision will be responsible for construction,
installation and maintenance of landscaping on each building site. By placing
responsibility for the arterial landscape buffers with a single entity (the Association),
greater consistency of design and maintenance may be achieved. At a minimum, the
landscape buffers shall be placed within a permanent landscape easement designated as
such on the plat. No easements are currently shown.
9. Six -foot -high, permanent perimeter fencing shall be required along the eastern boundary
of Lot 1, Block 3, and Lot 2, Block 1, and along the southern boundary of Lot 15 & 16,
Block 1. Submit detailed fencing plans for review and approval with submittal of the
Final Plat. All required fencing is to be in place prior to issuance of building permits.
10. The Applicant is proposing to construct a fence along the east boundary of the Hunter
Lateral. Staff recommends the Lateral be piped and no fence constructed. Given the
close proximity of the proposed 200 unit apartment complex, High School, and Daycare,
staff recommends the applicant be required to comply with Ord. 12-4-13 (Piping of
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Pla -AZRZTP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 7
Ditches). The City required the developers of Raven Hill and Los Alamitos subdivisions
(upstream from subject site) to tile the Hunter and see no reason this site should receive
an exemption from the piping ordinance.
11. Applicant shall provide a vehicular access across the Hunter Lateral from the proposed
apartment complex (Site `B") to the proposed Office/Retail area (Site "A"). The purpose
of this connection is to minimize the vehicular impact on Overland Road and to provide
an internal connection to the Daycare and Retail sites. The Transportation Impact Study
submitted by Dobie Engineering, Inc. assumed 20% of the office and day care traffic
would be captured within the complex. However, this capturing cannot take place unless
an internal access road is provided. If a connection is not provided across the Hunter, an
additional 20% of vehicle trips would be added to Overland Road (based on Dobie's
estimations).
12. Applicant has provided the minimum required 35 feet of landscape buffer along Overland
Road, an entryway corridor. Staff agrees. They show 25 feet of landscape buffer along
Locust Grove Road (including the 5 foot wide detached sidewalk). Since Locust Grove is
not listed as an entryway corridor, Staff supports the 25 -foot buffer width for this arterial.
At a minimum, the Overland Road landscape buffer must be completed from the eastern
property boundary to 30 feet west of Millenium Way prior to issuance of certificate of
occupancy for any building within the subdivision.
13. Applicant is proposing a 30 -foot wide private road (Y2K Lane) to serve Lot 6 and 8,
Block 1. Applicant should explain the purpose for the private classification and whether
or not sidewalks will be provided. All private roads must approved by the City Council.
Staff questions the intent of the private classification, particularly when this will be the
first drive providing access into the site for eastbound traffic on Overland and will likely
be heavily used. If approved, Staff recommends 5 -foot sidewalks be provided on at least
one (1) side of the road.
Preliminary Plat Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions: a) additional
fencing is provided, b) the Hunter Lateral is tiled, c) provide a single vehicular connection across
the Hunter Lateral, and d) landscaping is provided and constructed per item #12. Until the City
receives a copy of the ACHD report, the public hearing should be continued.
CUP (PUD/COMMERCIAL) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-017)
1. As part of a conditional use permit, the City of Meridian may impose restrictions and
conditions in addition to current City Ordinances.
2. This Conditional Use Permit is for the overall concept only. Future phases of the project
will require separate Conditional Use Permits for each phase and each must substantially
comply with the final approved Concept Plan.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plm.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc
i -a
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 8
3. Conceptually (based upon the submitted Overall Preliminary Site Plan dated 2-01-00),
staff believes the project is in accord with the purpose of Planned Developments as
outlined in the Subdivision & Development Ordinance. The mixed residential, office,
recreation and retail uses meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and should
contribute to a reduction in traffic in this area.
4. Planned Development Regulations: As a mixed/planned use development, the Resolution
Plaza development must comply with the following sections of the subdivision
ordinance: 12-6-4 Procedures for Planned Developments, 12-6-6 General Regulations for
Planned Development, and 12-6-7 General Standards for Planned Developments. In
addition, residential areas must comply with 12-6-8-A Design Standards for Planned
Development -Residential. All commercial and office uses must comply with 12-6-8-B
Design Standards for Planned Development -Commercial.
5. Colored Rendering: Colored renderings of the development must be submitted prior to
the City Council meeting to meet the intent of Section 12-6-4 of the PD ordinance.
6. Open Space: All Planned Developments (PD) are required to have at least 10% of the
gross land area of the PD as common open space as 12-6-7-E-5. The total common open
space calculation for Resolution Plaza is shown separately on Sheets 1-3 (Sites "A" —
"C"). Site "A" is 4.53 acres (1.44 required), Site `B" is 5.29 acres (1.45 required), and
Site "C" is 4.10 acres (1.86 required). These calculations include landscape buffers and
islands. Standard practice has been that residential PD's cannot count required buffers
and landscape setbacks toward the 10% open space requirement, but commercial PD's
have been allowed to count it.
Total gross site acreage for the Resolution Plaza project is 47.04 acres (excluding public
rights-of-way). 10% open space would be 4.7 acres. The minimum amount of open space
has been met. All open space delineated as common open space must meet all standards
of 12-6-7-E.
7. Parking: The matrix below summarizes the total off-street parking counts for the
conceptual PD -C:
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ. RZ. PP. CUP. doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 9
- LDS Seminary 17 20 (est.)
- Office buildings S of Gala St. (2) 129 98
- Retail & office buildings N of Gala St- (2) 317 287
- Ice Arena 278 286 (1/5 seats
*The Applicant is proposing 152 tandem parking spaces for the complex. The P&Z
Commission discouraged tandem parking for a proposed apartment complex of similar
size in October 1999 (Valerie Heights). If the tandem parking is subtracted from the total
parking spaces, their total provided would be 401 spaces.
On the Site "A" plan, a row of parking is proposed along the south edge of the north
driveway and along both the north and south edges of the south driveway with no
separation. Given the likelihood of these private driveways receiving high volumes of
traffic at build -out (functioning more as public roads), Staff feels this design would be
unsafe and should be relocated. The first parking stalls are less than 40 feet from the
property line and vehicles backing out of the stalls into the drive aisle will likely be a
hazard for vehicles entering the site off Locust Grove.
The proposed Ice Arena seats a total of 1,430 people. Technically, the Applicant meets
City ordinance, which is based on one stall for every 5 seats. If one assumes the arena
will utilize the parking north of Gala Street for evening events, an additional 317 stalls
could feasibly be added to serve the arena, providing a total of 595 stalls. The Applicant
should provide more detail on the hours of operation for the ice arena and their
experience with other similar venues and whether or not both rinks will be used
simultaneously.
8. Parking Lot Landscaping: Landscape islands serving a single row of parking shall have
one tree. Islands serving a double row of parking shall have two trees. A minimum of
one 3" caliper tree per 1500 square feet of asphalt (including driveways connecting from
the loop road) is required per City Ordinance.
9. Streets and Circulation: Staff agrees with the proposed stub road (Gala Street) to the east,
unplatted property. As stated in the Preliminary Plat comments, we recommend access be
provided internally with a connection between Sites "A" and `B". There is a conflict
between the Concept Plan and Plat for the Seminary site. The plat proposes a flag lot for
Lot 4, Block 1 (the proposed 19,648 s.f. office building), with the flag serving as the
driveway. However, the Concept Plan shows the seminary utilizing the flag driveway, not
the office. Staff does not disagree with the design, but it should be noted for future cross
access agreements.
10. Signage: The Applicant submitted a letter from Idaho Electric Signs regarding signage
for the apartment complex and a letter from Patrick McKeegan outlining intent for the ice
arena signage. The monument signs shall not exceed 70 s.f. All signage throughout the
PD -C shall be coordinated and complement building materials and themes. This applies
to all future buildings.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza .AZ.RZ.PP_CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 10
11. Storage Areas: Per Ordinance 12-6-8.A.1, Storage areas shall be provided for the
anticipated needs of boats, campers, motorhomes, and trailers. No such areas are
designated on the Site Plan. Applicant shall either provide a storage area adequate to
serve every two (2) living units or provide evidence that storage needs can be met
through an alternative method.
12. Maintenance Building: A maintenance building or approved area shall be provided that is
suitable for the services required for the repair and maintenance of all common areas as
per Section 9-607.H.3.
13. Trash Enclosures: No trash enclosures are shown on the Conceptual Site Plan. Staff
recommends all such areas be situated outside of view from either Overland or Locust
Grove Roads. Applicant shall coordinate locations and construction requirements of the
required trash enclosures with Meridian Sanitary Service, Inc., and provide a letter of
approval from their office when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance.
14. Hours of Operation: No details of hours of operation are provided. For the future CUP
applications, all office and retail uses should be harmonious with the apartment complex
and residential homes to the west.
15. Alternative Transportation Options: At build -out, this site will serve as a principal center
of employment for the east Meridian/west Boise area. While Boise Urban Stages does not
currently service Overland Road, it has the potential to be a likely destination point for
mass transit in the future. Staff strongly recommends an area be designated and/or
preserved on the Concept Plan for a future bus stop. We also recommend the inclusion of
bicycle racks at all office and retail buildings and the ice hockey arena.
16. All conditions placed on this application shall run with the land and shall not lapse or be
waived as the result of any change in tenancy or ownership of any or all of the lands
governed by this CUP application. All such conditions shall be deemed the requirements
for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any use or structure as per City
Ordinance.
17. Applicant shall utilize the Ada County Highway District design standards for the private
street within this development, with the exception of width requirements. Street designs
shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Meridian Public Works Department.
PD -C Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the concept plan with the above conditions. The hearing should be
continued until ACHD submits a report.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 11
CUP (APARTMENT COMPLEX) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-017)
1. All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site `B" (apartment complex)
shall be incorporated here.
2. The Applicant is proposing to construct the complex in two (2) phases, with the first phase
consisting of approximately 140 units and the clubhouse. Staff recommends the number of
units constructed in phase 1 be limited to a maximum of thirty (30) dwelling units and that no
more units be granted occupancy until Overland Road capacity is improved.
Overland Road between Locust Grove and Eagle Road is currently a two-lane, non -
signalized arterial. Numerous traffic concerns have been entered into the public record
regarding the capacity of both Overland Road and Locust Grove Road. Traffic was cited as
one of the principal reasons for the City's denial of the proposed Sundance Apartments at the
NW corner of Locust Grove Road and Overland Road last Fall. Dobie Engineering's traffic
study lists Overland Road (east of Locust Grove Road) as having 11,230 vehicles/day in
7/98. Over the past twenty (20) months, this figure has certainly increased; especially
factoring in the new homes built in Sherbrooke Hollows to the south. Dobie's study estimates
1,170 new trips/day to be generated by the apartment complex and 335 new trips/day
generated by the ice arena. The study also projects a Level of Service "F" for the left -turn
outs from all three Overland Road driveways until signals are installed. The study further
assumes the high school, potentially slated for construction in 2001 (which is the same year
as the apartment complex), will generate 3,000 trips/day and 250 peak hour trips.
Overland Road is designated in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as a 5 -lane
arterial with bike lanes to be constructed in 2005. Staff believes that limiting new
development on the subject site, to the Ice Arena and thirty (3 0) apartments would facilitate a
smoother transition for the neighborhoods and ease the impact on Overland Road until such
time as it is widened and signalized.
3. All applicable Fair Housing and ADA requirements for multi -family housing must be met,
including accessibility design for the ground floor units. Handicap parking shall be provided
to serve the Clubhouse.
CUP (Apartments) Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the condition that only the
clubhouse and thirty (30) dwelling units receive occupancy until Overland Road is improved.
The hearing should be continued until ACHD submits a report.
CUP ("THE POND ICE ARENA) REQUIREMENTS (File CUP -00-015)
1. All requirements provided in the PD -C section that apply to Site "C" (ice arena) shall be
incorporated here.
2. A minimum of seven (7) handicap accessible spaces must be provided to directly serve this
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ,PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 12
facility. Only two (2) are shown. Revise site plan accordingly.
CUP (Ice Arena) Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The hearing should be continued until
ACHD submits a report.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS
The 1993 Comprehensive Plan contains a variety of goals and policies relevant to this
application. The following sections most directly apply to the proposed project and are repeated
here for the Council and Commission's consideration during the hearing process.
Goal 3 is "to encourage the kind of economic growth and development which supplies
employment and economic self-sufficiency for existing and future residents, reduces the present
reliance on Boise and strengthens the City's ability to finance and implement public
improvements, services, and its open space character."
Goal 4 is "to provide housing opportunities for all economic groups within the community."
Goal 8 is "to establish compatible and efficient use of land through the use of innovative and
functional site design."
Economic Development
1.1 The City of Meridian shall make every effort to create a positive atmosphere that
encourages... commercial enterprises to locate in Meridian.
1.3 The character, site improvements and type of new commercial or industrial developments
should be harmonized with the natural environment and respect the unique needs and
features of each area.
Land Use
1.4U Encourage new development that reinforces the City's present development pattern of
higher density development within the Old Town area and lower density development in
outlying areas.
1.8U Promote the development of high-quality and environmentally compatible residential
areas that contain the necessary parks, schools and commercial facilities to maintain and
form identifiable neighborhoods.
2.1 U Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi -family,
townhouses, duplexes, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the
City with a range of affordable housing opportunities.
2.2U Support strategies for the development of neighborhood parks within all residential areas.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc
r-�
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 13
2.3U Protect and maintain residential neighborhood property values, improve each
neighborhood's physical condition and enhance its quality of life for residents.
4.8U Encourage commercial uses, offices and medical -care uses to locate in the Old Town
district, business parks, shopping centers and near high-intensity activity areas, such as
freeway interchanges.
6.8U New urban density subdivisions which abut or are proximal to existing rural residential
land uses shall provide screening and transitional densities with larger, more comparable
lot sizes to buffer the interface between the urban level densities and rural residential
densities.
Transportation
1.4U Monitor and coordinate the compatibility of the land use and transportation system.
1.20U Encourage proper design of residential neighborhoods to ensure their safety and
tranquility.
Open Space, Parks and Recreation
2.5U New subdivision development... will be considered as opportunities to ... encourage the
development of recreational open spaces and parks as part of new planned developments.
Housing
1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide diversity of housing types ... in a
variety of locations suitable for residential development.
1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping
centers shall be encouraged.
1.6 Housing proposals shall be phased with transportation, open space and public service and
facility plans, which will maximize benefits to the residents, minimize conflicts and
provide a tie-in between new residential areas and service needs.
1.19 High-density development, where possible, should be located near open space corridors
or other permanent major open space and park facilities, and near major access
thoroughfares.
Community Design
5.2 Ensure that all new development enhances rather than detracts from the visual quality of
its surroundings, especially in areas of prominent visibility.
6.5U Establish land -use designations that reflect the character of existing neighborhoods.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Pl=.AZ.RZ.PP.CUP.doc
Mayor, Council and P&Z
March 20, 2000
Page 14
6.11 U Promote well-planned and well -designated affordable housing in all Meridian
neighborhoods.
AZ -00-004, RZ-00-003, PP -00-006
CUP -00-017, CUP -00-016, CUP -00-015
Resolution Plaza. AZ,RZ,PP.CUP.doc
03-01-00 11:59 MERIDIAN WA5TEWATER ID=2088840744 P01/04
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY ..�
MAYOR LEGAL DEPARTMENT
Robert D. Corrie A Good Place to Live (208) 288-2499 • F,X 288.2501
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS
Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-2211 • Fax 887-1297
Tammy dcwccrd (208) S88-4433 - Fax (208) 857-4813 PLANNINGAND ZONING
Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT
(208)884-5533 - Fax 888-6854
TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH TIME CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian
Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations
to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13, 2000
TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE:_ March 22, 2000
FILE NUMBER: CUP -00-017
REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF MULTI -FAMILY, COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND LDS
SEMINARY — PROPOSED LO AND CG ZONING
BY: G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENTIOVERLAND, LLC
LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND
ROADS --(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED)
SALLY NORTON, PIZ
KENT BROWN, PIZ
THOMAS BARBEIRO, PIZ
_RICHARD HATCHER, PIZ
_KEITH SORUP, PIZ
ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR
�RON ANDERSON, C/C
CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C
_KEITH BIRD, C/C
TAMMY de WEERD, C/C
!WATER DEPARTMENT
SEWER DEPARTMENT
SANITARY SERVICE
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
iFIRE DEPARTMENT
POLICE DEPARTMENT
_CITY ATTORNEY
CITY ENGINEER
^CITY PLANNER
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT
IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM & FINAL)
FF,,cF-41vT---0D
MAR - 1 2000
CITY OF MERIDIAN
MAR 01 '00 12:00 2088840744 PAr,F ni
MAYOR
'^ HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY .�
Robert D. Corrie
A Good Place to Live
LEGAL DEP.-\RTMENT
CITY OF MERIDIAN
208) _288-2499 - Fax 233.250'
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Ron Anderson
33 EAST IDAHO
PUBLIC
PUBLIC tvORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Keith Bird
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 837-2211 • Fax 887-1297
Tammy deWeerd
(208) 388-4•133 • Fax (208) 887-.1813
PLANNING AND ZONING
Cherie McCandless
City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218
DEPARTMENT
(208) 881-5533 • Fax 888-6851
TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian
Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations
to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13, 2000
TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000
FILE NUMBER: CUP -00-017
REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF MULTI -FAMILY COMMERCIAL OFFICE AND LDS
SEMINARY – PROPOSED LO AND CG ZONING
BY: G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND, LLC
LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND
ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED)
SALLY NORTON, P/Z
KENT BROWN, P/Z
THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z
_RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z
_KEITH BORUP, P/Z
_ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR
_RON ANDERSON, C/C
CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C
_KEITH BIRD, C/C
TAMMY de WEERD, C/C
VILWATER DEPARTMENT
_SEWER DEPARTMENT
SANITARY SERVICE
_BUILDING DEPARTMENT
_FIRE DEPARTMENT
POLICE DEPARTMENT
_CITY ATTORNEY
_CITY ENGINEER
_CITY PLANNER
.FE
FFR 2 s 2000
CITY OF MERIDIAN
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT
IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM & FINAL)
YOUR CONCISE R
'?,ECEIVED
FEB 2 S 2000
Meridian City
Water Superiatendeat
lz_�f
MAYOR y. NUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
Robert D. Corrie A Good Place to Live
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS x
ITY OF MERIDIA,
Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO��
Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813' R 2 8 200111
Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218
of i'i'Ierdiaru
Clerk Office
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 - Fax 288-2501
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 - Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533 - Fax 888-6854
TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian
Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations
to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 13, 2000
TRANSMITTAL DATE- February 25, 2000 HEARING DATE: March 22, 2000
FILE NUMBER: CUP -00-017
REQUEST: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF MULTI -FAMILY COMMERCIAL OFFICE AND LDS
SEMINARY – PROPOSED LO AND CG ZONING
BY: G.L. VOIGT DEVELOPMENT/OVERLAND. LLC
LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: LOCUST GROVE AND OVERLAND
ROADS—(SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ENCLOSED)
SALLY NORTON, P/Z
KENT BROWN, P/Z
THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z
_RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z
_KEITH BORUP, P/Z
_ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR
_RON ANDERSON, C/C
CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C
_KEITH BIRD, C/C
_TAMMY de WEERD, C/C
_WATER DEPARTMENT
_SEWER DEPARTMENT
SANITARY SERVICE
_BUILDING DEPARTMENT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
POLICE DEPARTMENT
_CITY ATTORNEY
_CITY ENGINEER
_CITY PLANNER
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT
IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT)
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL)
YOUR CONC66IE RI?IMARKS: