Loading...
Park and Ride ACHD CUP 00-032 .,ITY CLERK FILE CHECKLIST Project Name: Park 8~ Ride Contact Name f ,tr~~ ~ ~ Phone: Date Received from Planning and Zoning Department: Planning and Zoning Level: Hearing Date: ^ Transmittals to agencies and others: _ ^ Notice to newspaper with publish dates: _ ^ Certifieds to property owners: _ ^ Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Notes: ^ Approve ^ Deny City Council Level: Q Transmittals to agencies and others: x^ Notice to newspaper with publish dates: Q Certifieds to property owners: City Council Action: 387-6100 and Hearing Date: July 5, 2000 n/a - n/a n/a ~e;aprove Findings /Conclusions /Order received from attorney on: Findings /Conclusions /Order: ^ Approved by Council: _ ^ Copies Disbursed: _ ^ Findings Recorded ^ Published in newspaper: ^ Copies Disbursed: Ordinance No. Resolution No. ^ Approved by Council: ^ Recorded: Deadline: 10 days Development Agreement: ^ Sent for signatures: ^ Signed by all parties: ^ Approved by Council: ^ Recorded: ^ Copies Disbursed: __ Notes: No 2nd public hearing for CUP in Commercial Zones File No. CUP 00-032 and n/a ^ Deny ~ /lI Resolutions: Original Res /Copy Cert: Minutebook Copy Res /Copy Cert: City Clerk City Engineer City Planner City Attomey Sterling Codifiers Project File Copy Res /Original Cert: Ada County (CPAs) Applicant (non-CPAs) Recorded Ordinances: Original: Minutebook Copies to: City Clerk State Tax Comm. Sterling Cod'rfiers City Attomey City Engineer City Planner Project file Applicant (if appl.) Findings /Orders: Original: Minutebook Copies to: Applicant Project file City Engineer City Planner City Attomey "' Record Vacation Findings *' Recorded Developrrent /~greemeMs: Ortginal:Fireproof File Copies to:Applicant Project file City Engineer City Planner City Attomey "'~ , NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho at the hour of 7:00 p.m. on June 13, 2000 for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of Ada County Highway District for a conditional use permit for 6.36 acres for proposed park and ride lot for 100 vehicles located on the southwest corner Meridian Road and northeast corner Overland Road. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 19th day of May, 2000. ~{~~~t~tigl4f fit F41171t/~/~ ~~° ~ r w ~' ~° ~~.L ~~- ~~~' ~ ~~ ,~ ~ Q PUBLISH May 26 ar~f ~; ~~0 •~» ~.,~ ~` \4 1 `~ \~, t/tP`t~~tzt ¢44i44~ti~~~ ~~~~~--- ILLIAM G. BERG, JR., C Y CLERK .~. ~ i - i i -~ ~ ~ ! ~ - ', MAYOR HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY _ Robert D. Cowie A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT CITY COUN CITY OF MERIDIAN (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 CIL MEMBERS PUBL-C WORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 ~208> 887-z2t - • Fax 887--297 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZON-NG Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: June 2, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 9, 2000 HEARING DATE: June 13, 2000 FILE NUMBER: CUP-00-032 REQUEST: Park & Ride Lot for 100 Vehicles-6.36 Acres Zoned CG BY: Ada County Highway District LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Southwest corner Meridian Road. Northeast corner Overland Road - SALLY NORTON KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR _RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C TAMMY de WEERD, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE BUILDING DEPARTMENT _FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMEWT CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: CITY OF MERIDIAN APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ~C~~~ 4d~lF,I ~,,~.r-.a~ ~~u~,~~r~.I ~M.~3 L NAME: Ada Count Hi hwa District PHONE: 345-7635 ADDRESS: 318 East 37th Street Boise Idaho 83714-6499 /~~~~ GENERAL LOCATION: SW corner Sec. 16 T3N R1E NE corner of C DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE: Park and Ride Lot for 100 vehicles ZONING CLASSIFICATION: C-G ~~tiu~'~ I certify that the information contained herein is true and correct. LEGAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ~/• gnature of Applicant ~ ~~~ Pursuant tp established procedure, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a Public Hearing in the Meridian City Hall on at _ .m. The purpose of the Hearing is to consider a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT submitted by Ada County H~hway District for the property generally described as located at SW1/4 Sec 16 T3N R1E. NE corner Overland andSH69, SUBDIVISION, BLOCK ,LOT TO +~ 1. Name, address and phone number of applicant. Ada County Highway District 318 East 37th Street Boise, Idaho 83714-6499 Steve Spickelmier 208-345-7635 or John Sharp, P.E. Sharp & Smith, Inc 208-344-0676 Engineer in charge of the design 2. Name, address and phone number of property owner. J.L. Boyd Company 202 N. 9th Street, Suite 201 P.O. BOX B I OS Boise, Idaho 83707 James L. Boyd 208-388-0300 3. Legal Description enclosed. 4. Warranty deed and notarize consent of property owner enclosed. r-• 5, 6 & 7. Description of existing use and present use of the subject property. Proposed use of the subject property. DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING LAND USE/PRESENT USE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: The selected site for the park and ride is pasture land zoned C-G by the City of Meridian. The property is owned by a land development company and is slated for development, as stated by the land owner. The surrounding land consists of one single family residence, zoned R-l, a automobile dealership, two service stations, one restaurant, a motel, and Interstate 84. The land is one single parcel with an access road provided to the lot from Overland Road. The access road will be improved to Ada County Highway District Standards and the right of way purchased. The City of Meridian has been contacted concerning the project. The proposed use is an permitted use according to their zoning requirements. PROPOSED USE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: The project consists of constructing a 100 plus vehicle park and ride lot near Meridian, Idaho. The project is planned for a 6.36 acre parcel located about 800 feet east of the SH69 and r~ ^ Overland Road intersection, on the north side of Overland Road. The site has been pasture land for many years and is adjacent to Interstate highway and to SH-69. The City of Meridian has zoned the area C-G. The surrounding land use varies from a private single family dwellings to a automobile dealership, a restaurant, a motel, and two service stations. The owner of this property is a development company and plans to develop the land. The project will comply with the City of Meridian's landscaping plans, which require one 3"caliper tree per 1500 square feet of asphalt surface. The project lot will have these trees and grass around the perimeter. The parking area is 46,680 square feet and will have 33 trees planted around the perimeter. The site will be irrigated via a pressure irrigation system. The storm water runoff will be run to a drainage Swale along the west side of the parking area and retained. The construction site will have silt fences and drainage swales constructed to contain the surface runoff during the actual construction. Since the Ten Mile Creek is the only stream channel in the project area, the channel bordering the project can have a berm constructed to prevent surface water from reaching the drain. In addition, dust abatement will be included in the construction specification to keep dust under control during construction. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: This project will assist in reducing the volume of vehicles on Overland Road, Franklin Road, SH-69, and I84 by either car pooling or van pool. The size of the lot is 118 vehicles. The lot is planned for the northeast corner of the intersection of Meridian Road and Overland Road. The lot is located along a frontage road and will be compatible with the surrounding area. This location is convenient for commuters wishing to travel to and from the above listed highways. No travel patterns will be changed only the number of occupants in a vehicle will be changed. In addition, no displacements will take place. This lot is expected to enhance the service to the surrounding neighborhood and allow commuting. No neighborhood or service impacts are anticipated. There will not be any loss of parking and no economic disruption is expected due to the fact that the construction will not effect the roadway nor will there be any detours. This lot is to conserve energy by promoting van or car pooling, and thus is consistent with energy conservation. Consistent with local of state planning? This park and ride lot is part of the long range planning of Ada County and is consistent with and included in the SIP as a strategy to improve air quality. Consideration of other alternatives. Ada County Highway District has reviewed many possible locations for park and ride lots. As part of this site selection, the area surrounding the Meridian Interchange was review for possible lot locations, 18 different locations were reviewed. This site was selected due to its availability and its closeness to the Meridian Interchange with I- 84 and a major intersection of county roads. The direct access to the interstate is of great importance for locating the lot at this location. Thus this site was the preferred alternative. Air Quality Impacts. Based upon the analysis completed by Ada County Highway 1'\ ~'` District, see enclosed analysis, the project will help improve the air quality of the area by reducing the number of vehicles on the highways. The enclosed analysis indicates that a reduction of 1.269 Lbs of CO and 349 Lbs of PM-10 is expected, Ada County Highway District analysis is attached. Flood plain Encroachment. The area of the proposed site is adjacent to the Ten Mile Drain, far southwest corner of the site. The drain then flows into a box culvert and crosses Sh-69 and the Interstate. The City Flood Map, panel number 160180-0004 A, shows that Ten Mile Creek has a small AE designated flood Zone, in which the base 100 year flood elevation has been determined. That flood elevation is at 2614 feet above mean seal level, which is to the top of the east bank of the Ten Mile Creek. A very small flood plain area is shown on the map which the parking is also outside. Thus no flood plain Development Permit is required. The flood plain map shows a `Zone X' which is a 500 year flood plain area. This project touches this zone, however after discussing this location with the City of Meridian, this is a 500 year flood designation and is not within the area of concern for FEMA. No ground disturbing construction will be done in the floodway area. The project area is to be constructed outside of the floodway area and the flood plain. Visual Impacts. This site is presently bare soil with some grasses. This site will have the asphalt surface and the disturbed ground will be seeded with grass and small trees, as part of the City of Meridian requirements. 8. Present Zoning is C-G. 9&10 enclosed 11. List of mailing address of all property owners with in 300'. Enclosed 12. See above discussion 13. Fee for filing as per City of Meridian is $299.22. 14. The applicant agrees to pay any additional sewer, water or trash fees or charges, if any, associated with the use, whether that use be residential, commercial or industrial. 15. The application has been verified and I state that the contents and information is true and correct. Signed: ~ Date: `~ ~ ~- ~°~~ W. Sharp, P.E. W.H. MOORE C O M P A N Y M E= IIA /'1 D A N A 11 ~~ r~cear' tstate ueve~opment 600 N STEELHEAD WAY, SUITE 144 (83704) P.O. BOX 8204 BOISE, IDAHO 83707-2204 April 10, 2000 To: City of Meridian From: Winston H. and Diane L. Moore Re: Consent to conditional use application TELEPHONE (208) 323-1919 /FAX 323-7523 The Ada County Highway District ("ACRD") is considering purchasing from us a parcel of land for the purpose of developing apark-and-ride lot. Please consider this as our consent to the application by ACRD or its representative, Sharp and Smith, Inc., to apply for and obtain the related conditional use permit, subject to the understanding that if ACRD does not close the purchase and the property is not developed for such use, then the regulations and conditions governing the use and development of the property will remain unchanged from those currently in place. Sincerely, Winston H. Moore A Di a L. Moore B Winston H. Moore, her att e - t sj Enclosure: copy of deed to Moore State of Idaho ) ss. County of Ada ) On this ~_ day of April, 2000, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Winston H. Moore, known or identified to me to be the same person described in and who executed the within instrument, and he duly acknowledged to me that he executed the same as principal, and additionally that he separately executed the name of Diane L. Moore as principal and his own name as her attorney in fact. ~ a '~ ': '~ Notary Public for Idaho ~,~~~'~~ ~ '~ Residing at /~ ~ ~1~-- s ~ f, u Comm Expires /,;2 - /,~ ~ ~ ~ ,,,, .9 27 q c"D J ~ ~ ~ ~ A ll`` J .~ a ' O l~' G ~ ~ rr ~~ ~ ~1~~ e.9 dim ~ a7, ?j 'y ~~UUsOOi'.E ~~ +$ WARRANTY DEED For value received, Cecil A. Thomas, the grantor, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto Winston H. Moore and Diane L. Moore, husband and wife, the grantee, whose current address is PO Box 8204, Boise, Idaho 83707, the following real property located in Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows, to wit: See Exhibit A, attached; Subject to current taxes and assessments, easements, rights-of-way and restrictions of record To have and to hold said premises, with their appurtenances, unto the grantee, its heirs and assigns forever. And the grantor does hereby covenant to and with the grantee that it is the owner in fee simple of said premises; that they are free from all encumbrances; and that it will warrant and defend the same from all lawful claims whatsoever. Dated: %~ % `~ - 95 ~e~~ c~1~~r ~~r~~ ~~ , /~ Y RECG,c ~---rte-c 1, ,! ~a~r-~-~' J. Gr~V10 t~~V1~RR0 _~~ iI -~~,~~-, ~~~~~,f;~ FEB. ~~'~r"~~ i Cecil A. Thomas ~ ~ - --- 2000 I;~ 17 !~j 1 IQ: 19 j (j 0 ~ ~_ ~ 0 0 2 State of Idaho ) ss. County of Ada) On this ~~ ~ day of 1995, before me, the undersigned, a Nota public m and for said State, ~ ersonall appeared Cecil A. Thomas, known or identified to me to be the same person described in and who executed the within instrument, and he duly acknowledged to me that he executed the same. ,,, , A,l~ ~. ~~( nL~ - ~.. . !)- ,. s , ~%z~ Notary F~iblic for Idaho Residing at ,~'r1i~:. ,~~~ Comm Expires ~ ~~ .,. -,A~~ - - - . ~ - -- ~~ /~ A parcel of land being a portion of Government Trot /+ of the 5TJ 1/G of Sec- tion 18, T.3N., R.lE:, B.M., Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a brass cap marking the Southwest: corner of the said Govern- ment Lot 4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 18; thence North 89°43'32" East 701.34 feet along t.•he Southerly boundary of the said Government Lot 4 of the SW I/4 of Section ].8, which is also the centerline of Overland Road, to a point; thence North 0°45'10" East 25.00 feet to an iron pi.n on the Northerly right- of-way line of the said Overland Road, also said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 0°45'10" East 9~i9.J_7. feet: to a highcaay right:-of-way monument marking a point of beginning of curve on t_•he proposed Southerly right- of-way line of Ramp B-C of Interstate Highway 80 North, Federal Aid Project No. I-80N-1(74)44; thence along the said proposed Southeastery i-i.ght-of-way Line of Ramp B-C of Interstate Highway 80 North along a curve to t:lye left: 320.58 feet, said curve having a central angle of 9°57'22", a radius of. 1,844.86 feet, tangents of 160.69 feet and a long chord of 320.17 feet bearing South 66°00'45" West to an ~.ron pin marking a point of tangent; thence South 61°02.04" West 388.26 feet a.a.on~; t:he said proposed. Sout'}~easi:er].y right-of-way line of Ramp B-C of Interstate highway 80 North to an iron pin oil t:lie Easterly right-of-way line of State Highway No, 69, as shown on Federal Aid Project No. I-80N-1(12)37; thence South 1°02'04" West 183.85 feet along t}ie said Easterly right-of-way line of State Highway No. 69 to an iron pin; thence South 6°51'05" West 52.00 feet along Clue said easterly right:-oi:-~oa~* line of State Highway No. 69 to an iron pin; thence North 89°28'42" East 574.55 feet L-o an iron pin; thence South 0°45'10" West 400.94 feet to an iron pin. on the said Northerly right-of-way line of Overland Road; thence North 89°43'32" East 60.01 feet along L'he said. Northerly right-oL•- waq line of Overland Road to the point of beginning, comprising 6.363 acres, more or less. SUBJECT T0: A 50.00 foot easement lying 50.00 feet Northeasterly of and adjacent with the centerline of Tenmile Creek. E,~9~ibRt ~i..~N . , gip. `~ ~ ~yz I y ~~ ~~V Stns. Env. ~• ~,. ~. ~A1F~izM~D ~~cCF Ll N E- s9;z-,~ r~s~- ~o~Yy i '-.4UrM . iii V ' 1 Li L~3~ L: ~~ •< ~° 73 V dZ~L r~• ---- --- ; ,` i ~~ i ,~ If `,I r~CR. ~~~ ?cr ~ ~i°,s~-; o~ a::rlf..:G c.. ~..r..~c-n~-~,s i ti1id~Nest American Svelter Systems ~ °.C. Bcx 1~~~ ~Rrcn. ~ric '310 :u~r. ~ nrorG`~`_0 ~r- BRA Nti sr ~.~ 1 ~:C~V~ ORA NING ~UM6~.R .f r f31KE-SHELL series The Bike-Shell' Solution Model 201 ~ 202 Series is designed for the economically motivated buyer, using FRP materials with OSB marine core. '~ One-piece frame with pre-hung door alleviates adjustment. An exterior of fiberglass reinforced plastic is highly resistant to impact and scratching. The outer finish never needs painting, will not rust or corrode and is extremely resistant to most stains and chemicals. The standard key-lock mechanism is completely internal and resists tampering (System for user provided padlock is also available.) Security free due to built-in door locks with concealed hinges. Locking bar from top to bottom. American Bicycle Security Company is one of the largest makers of bike security systems in the world, with dozens of satisfied customers and hundreds of successful installations throughout the united States. Our wide experience can help you get your bicycle transportation program off the ground and running fast. Phone today for more information concerning our new line of lockers. AMERICAN 131CYClE O SECURITY COMPANY iM For further information: American Bicycle Security Company P.O. Box 7359. Ventura, CA 93006 Te1800-245-3723 805-933-3688 Fax 805-933-1865 e-mail: turtleQa ameribike.com http: //www.ameribike.com/ /"~ ... ' --~, .' 12.23 em '4 E1~` I ,- ' s Specifications: Structure and finish Walls, tops, doors and door frames made of colored fiberglass- reinforced plastic with OSB core. Solid color never needs paint- ing, is graffiti resistant and resists impact and scratches. Interior walls of OSB sealed two side. Standard color is tan. Bottom of all walls are encapsulated in plastic or aluminum extrusion for superior durability. Frame Walls, tops and door frames shall lock together utilizing custom extrusion manufactured from 6063-T5, commercial anodized aluminum. Locks and locking hardware Chicago ACI II, 7 pin tumbler Pop Out "T" handle locks with three keys and removable lock cylinders. Internal locking hard- ware consists of six chromolly steel cams controlling an extruded aluminum locking bar which engages the door frame over 3 foot span. High quality custom extruded continuous door hinge has no hinge pins to wear or rust. All fastener and assembly hard- ware is zinc plated or better and internal to prevent tampering. Optional features: • Heavy Duty pad lock system that will accommodate high security pad locks. • MEDECO Stainless Steel high security T-Handle lock. • Coin and Token operated locks for collection or return. • Ventilation system, includes stainless steel louvered vents on exterior walls for dissipation of heat and dampness. Also allows air exchange throughout all lockers. Visit our web site for the most current list of new designs and features. //www.ameribike.com/ See price sheet for more options. AMERICAN t31CYClE 0 SECURITY COMARNY ,~~ ©JP.N 1998J.5 V J pC Cd O ¢ c o 7E a ~ g mC ~.e ~ Sa 8 JOS ~W 0~ 1G~1W ~-~°~~ oNO~~°nE~°x¢E ~+ 1-c~ zz-~~n 7n-OE `t `Q o~c ~o~-v+wm ~-no a Ct~<N ¢1--1- I 1 LLpr7N 'N 00o WoNEEw O~oE OoC C~e-~ G¢40C WUW6 LYO 1~NMf ~¢df~M~-1M~ 1~t n n =~~ s tE S ~~ A __~ No ~` 1.20X n n~ _ i N / y O~ I 1 i 'i n ;. .r v!' 4f~1 L_-:.~-- ~.. L ~V ~ .- ~ -'~ , ~. ~, bra , O~q ~." ~~ ~~J 7 IJ ~ ~ ti y N n ~ ~ ~ ~Q ~~ ~ ~ 8. a~ J \ a Z p o ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ ~ DZ `~ \~ 1^ W Q \ ~ ~ \` ~ ~ .. \. ~ `~.~ , \ J Y ~ ~` ;i '~~ -t t ~,. - i 0 ,~ ~ F.._.._.->.____ W ~ O ~ 10 ,1\ n O Q ~ o a ~ `, Z ¢ V y (~ 1~1 t 7 V ~ W ~' ~j ~ II '~ F z '~%i ~n II ~G4H 'a ~~< :~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ a I F i ~~ ~ ~yyy1~H y'~ ','SSo~~i P U~~ ~pl O''.,..` "'~ SOUTH ^~ I-84 _Q ~~ Q P~~ ~ ~~5~ ~ ~ ~, O ~~ ' .~ r~ i O~ ~~ ~a '~ :~ ~ y ~~ ~ :~ 25' ~ 25' 26' f~ ~ f ~ ,~~~ ~ n J ~~\ 3 = 1:~ ~ t .~ W `"' Q r.~ a ~ f v r /~/~ V/ / ^^ 1~ 1 ~(/~ f L.C. z ~` H R']~U :tuanaaa F---i ~~ ~ S f L I` it 1 ~ ~ x .nwc 7 ~ :ue.nae-a ~ ! `~ .-. urnTT1T AAI G ~MERII ~. N -. ~ .~ ~--~ ~ I.a s t I e a ~ e i II a I~ ..- - ~~ tl~~ e ~ I a~ an.c c anauur_ e t II .' ~ j 8' 2' I a /30' R.+C - I r ~"~ City of Meridian Conditional Use Permit Application Checklist Applicant: ~h~A ~ ,~,,,,;~, Date: ti' /~/ oC~ Project: a.c,~-cn 1'~. , u ~. r~ ~,.1 a - n ~ .~,.~,nt .~ ntiu.:dl~,~.- ,ZOn¢ : @ C-~ Item No. Description Comments ~ 1. A licant contact information 2. Pro e owner contact information ,/ 3. Le al descri tion ,/ 4.a. Warranty deed (recorded) / 4.b. Notarized consent of ro ert owner 5. Descri tion of existin use uildin use) ,i 6. Present use of ro ert other land use / 7. Pro sed use of roe ,/ 8. Zone of ro ert / 9. Vicinit ma - 30 copies referred scale 1"=300' / 10. Site lan (scale of not less than 1 "=50') - 35 copies 10.a. Buildin locations ,/ 10.b. Parkin and loadin azeas 10.c. Traffic access drives .~ 10.d. Traffic circulation atterns I O.e. O en/common s aces 10.f. Landsca a lan ,/ 10. Refuse & service areas ~ 10.h. Utilities lan, includin : / -Sewer ,/ -Water ,/ - Irri ation / - Storm drains e 10.i. Signage (number, location, overall dimensions -elevations re erred, not re uired 10.'. 8`/2" x 11" co of site lan / 10.k. Buildin elevations rout, rear and sides / 10.1. Construction materials m be included on elevations drawin 11. Surroundin roe mailin addresses / 12. Characteristics of roe that make conditional use desirable 13. A lication and mailin fee ~ q , ~- ~/ 14. Additional services statement ,/ 15. A lication verification statement 16. Postin of ro ert affidavit C:\P&Zadmin\CUPCheckl ist2 Sent By: City of Meridian; 20HHBH6H54; May-3-00 2:29PM; Page 2/2 9k~RP & SMITH. INC_ 206341"4676 ~"-i ? 1 ' i SHARP & SMITH INC. NG ~~ & S~RVEY~ ~&S ENGINEE~t3 327 NORM Q7TH STRreEf . eOi5£ IDAHO83702-4797 • AREA CODE 208/S44.Od7d May 3, 2000 i ~: TO: i I Clay of ly~erldlan I' 20o E. C~Ntan Suit® 201 Meridian Idaho 83642 RE.• AG`HD Park & R/de Condltlona/ Use ~: I~ AFFADAVIT ~ The above indicated property will be posted by Sharp & Smith, tnc. one weak prior to'the public hearing. ' ' SI d: ~ ' ~; j ~~z ~ . John W: Sharp P.E. & P.L.S. ~ , JWS:ms ' MAY 03 '00 14 30 2088886854 PAGE.02 ~ ~. ACHD~ Park n'Ride Lot Fropert_y owners within 340' THOMAS C:ECTL A PO BUX 8204 BOTSE ID 83707-2204 W (?VERT.Al~iD RU AULI3ACI~f DANIEL P & AULBACH DIANA L i 674 COLiIV'I'RY TERRACE WAY MERIDIAN Td $3642-3003 CHETWO(?D LAWRENCE H & SHIRLE Y S PO $OX 207 MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 250 E OVERLAND RD 550 E OVVERLAND RD E OVERLAND RD COPE CCiRINh'E E 9 30 E OVERLAND RD MERIDIAN ID 83642-3048 130 E OVERLAND RD FLYII~TG J INC 50 VV 990 BRiGHAM CITY UT 84302-0678 1580 N [44ERIll1AN Kll HARM(7N SIDNEY WILLIAM 8c I)Egt3RAH ANiti~ 1637 COL`NTRY TERRACE WAY MERlD1AN ID 83642-3002 KI,1NE DAV1fl A ?27 E 1ST ST iViERIDLAN TD 8364a-3o3I 1635 S GIBSGtiN WAY G:4CTDETTE M1CHAI~L VIC`1'i]R 1536 COUNTRY TERTLA{;E WAY MbRII)L43r' ID 8364,;.-3l'!03 LITTT~:E J:]Y~'L' A I o3~3 S GTBSON WAY MERIDIAN ill 0000$-364'2 GAiGE A JOHN & META E TRUST GAiGL• A JC}IIN & META E TRZ3STEES 167] COUNTR'r' TERRAC`.E 4VAY l4iERIDiAN lb 33642-3002 RUNDELL MARViN L & R1.JNDEI,I, NORMA L 1677 GI~3SC)N WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642-3031. "1`HACKER PATRICK M 8t JUDI B 165 E OVERLAND RD MERIDIAN 1D 83642-3012 14IOREDA ATITHONY J 16000 S VISTA AY11 KUNA ID 83634-2728 ' 1'13 S COUNTRY TfiR,ltACE WAY CARSON BRTAN L & CARSON ANN M 1712 COUNTRY TERRACE WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642-3U05 aen~ ny: ~l~y ~ ivier LU~~jr ; ~~ 2i3© E. CArYtCr1 Avg., Ste. 2D1 phone 884--5533 / Fsx 888-6849 ~ John Sharp c~aaoovo:;~+~ ~. Frome Sonya Dey Fax: 34d-0676 3 (tndude. Cover) Pf':a~a Deli 01123100 Rea ACRD Paris n' Ride trot -~ pr~opQrty awrrer GC: list ^ Urywtt F~ Far fEte~riaw ~ Plews~ Con+rte~n# ©Pfln~se Reply ^ Pfle~~ Recycle • ~~: ~~ ~ rn:Li !ir'ic~s `L~ ~ ~I'{ rte ~ ~, ~3 J ~~~, ~~- ~- ~ ~s nut- ne~esS~Lrr ~o rn~K.~ 3ta cap+ e ~ o.~ +{-ti.~ a_t~tct chid ~r~r1i-!'7~ ~r YV~Q.~ - ~ ~S ~''ho~~ h- a u Z~ ~^ m O n Z D //7C~~ { z~ ~- r~ O ~ ~ o O '- ~ f- m ~ _ CD fp ~ N z N a ~ (, ~ ~ ~ ~ V ° V / ~ ^~ C A ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~~ A t9 ~ p O ~ ~ {- < d . m ~ • ° o 3 ~ c N H ~ m F. i~ 2 d n ~ ~ v O \ _ / ^\ ~ m L ` ` ..7' a d r '- n; ~ ~ ° Z ~ o n ~ n ~ ° n o t m ~ A ° O -I p (D T -I a a x N I"' n 0 Or. N ~ ~ v N G ~ ~ N - - -- - - -- r ~ N _ " !~ C w O O =mom a ~ Q Woo~m W < ?0 ~ ~v _n Z SHARP & SMITH, INC. 327 N. 27TH ST. 208-344-0676 BOISE, ID 83702 5460 92-372/1231 3624 ' 's DATE April 28, 2000 PAY ~;~~~ ORDER OF City of Meridian --- ~ ~ 299.22 i~l Two hundred ninety-nine and 22/ 100 --- ~ ry -,~,e= i4j DOLLARS ~~~• ~~ ~bank® ~I Anytime, Anywhere Access ', 1-800-673-3555 i~.', www.usbank.com '~,~~ Conditional Use Permit Gy- FOR _._.._ __._ m ~I'005460~I' ~:~23103729~:~53300 L30311' m J ~ CoC w-0 ~ ~ ~ J0S 2W EG EG=~WLL L~ OOZLL ppI ONOEEp~~OXE OHO ~07C X01-NN~ COEE ~Q1 CU EEEEE`7771n ¢t-f-I ILL*~aN 'N ~ooo o~4oowW~wa 8~ a~Nn ~2~non ~ .n nv~n.-svl~ rda`- 0 n n z~~ ~~ •~ ~7 ~~~ ~J ° .~~~~,b,,~d, ~x Q a ~ -~-1 ~ ~ ~ _ ~~- -~i-- 4 ~ o ~I \ o ~~ ^ \. ~ Y Y ` + ., ~ ~ \ ~ ' ,,~ ~ N „ ~ M ~ O \ Z ~~. O -_.....~ ~ 1 ~ n H f o ,f ~~ n O n o ` ~ O ~' ~ ~ Z ~~, o W n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~\i t -~; ~ - -- - ~~ of '.. Y ° ~ ~ -- - -- _ a ( o H ~' ----- --- - x~' ''':t ~~~ ,~ s ~ ~ z w ,' x t a I H ~~ ~ s o ~ z ati~ o i " r ~ ~ `P WW N j' l / G / / ' yi O C /, / i O ~ /~ / The Idaho Statesman ~' ~~~~~~tir M>~'f 2 ~ L~~1 P.O. Box 40, Boise, Idaho 83707-0040 LEGAL ADVERTISING PROOF OF PUBLICA~~'~G F~~~ri~' '= Identification Amount: 064514 (447417 NOTICE OF HEARING I $1 16 88 Ordered by P.O. # Rate Run Dates NT MAY 11, 25, 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN Number of Lines 33 EAST IDAHO ST. 73 MERIDIAN, ID 83642 Affidavit Legal # 10366 JANICE HILDRETH, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That she is the Principal Clerk of The Idaho Statesman, a daily newspaper printed and published at Boise, Ada County, State of Idaho, and having a general circulation therein, and which said newspaper has been continuously and uninterruptedly published in said County during a period of twelve consecutive months prior to the first publication of the notice, a copy of which is attached hereto: that said notice was published in The Idaho Statesman, in conformity with Section 60-108, Idaho Code, as amended for: 7~/O consecutive weekly single consecutive daily odd skip insertion(s) beginning with the issue of: MAY 1 1 2001 and ending with the issue of: MAY 2 5 2001 COUNTY OF ADA On this 2 5 day of MAY in the year of 2001 before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared before me Janice Hildreth known or identified to me to be the person whose name subscribed to the within instrument, and being by me first duly sworn, declared that the state- ments therein are true, and acknowledged to me that she executed the same. ~!~ Notary Public for Ida Residing at: Boise, Idaho ~ L ,,~I~)~~I~ expires: ~ G` 'fir • o; ~OTAR j, ti .y ? ~•~ '• '°UBLlG ~'t: ~`'~unn~~~~~ SIAItUFIDAHO ) )SS Others present: Bill Nichols, Shari Stiles, Gary Smith, Will Berg, Tom Kuntz Bill Gordon. Corrie: I'll open the Meridian City Council meeting for the night at 7:30 .m. and I'll have the City Clerk call roll, please. First off, I want to thank everybod for being here tonight. I told the Fire Marshall to leave town for awhile and so he won't be interrupting our seating arrangements here. First off, I would like to thank Mr. Foomer's (sic) high school government class .for being here this evening and also for giving up the seats. They're going to be leaving at about 8:00 and they said they didn't want to interrupt as much as possible, so the were standing in the back and -Thank you guys for comin y should say. Also, we have Troop 138 - is also represented hereuto seeu how government works. I am anxious to see how it works tonight, as well. Also, one little item that I want everybody to know is that we're celebrating a birthda u here tonight. Cherie McCandless' birthday is today. So Cherie, congratulationp from the Council and the audience and Happy Birthday to you. Bird: Let's sing to her. Item A. Approve minutes of August 10, 2000, Special City Council Meeting: Item B. Approve minutes of August 22, 2000, Special City Council Meeting: Item C. Approve minutes of August 24, 2000, Special City Council Meeting: Item D. Tabled from July 5, 2000: Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: CUP 99-039 Request for Conditional Use Permit for planned unit development including continuing care retirement community, single- and multi-family residential and office and retail use by Touchmark Living Centers -Joseph A. Billig -east of St. Luke's between Franklin Road and Interstate 84: Item E. Tabled from September 5, 2000: Amended Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: CUP 00-032 Request for Conditional Use Permit for 6.36 acres for a proposed Park-and-Ride Lot for ~~ ~~~y ~~unai Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order by Mayor Robert D. Corrie at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, September 19, 2000. Members present: Robert Corrie, Keith Bird, Tammy De Weerd, Cher' McCandless, Ron Anderson. ie Meridian City Council Meeting iti, September 19, 2000 Page 2 r_ 100 vehicles by Ada County Highway District currently in a C-G zone -southwest corner of Meridian Road and northeast corner of Overland Road: Item F. Tabled from September 5, 2000: Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: AZ 00-009 Request for annexation and zoning of 101.4 acres from RT to R-4 for proposed Autumn Faire Subdivision by Gem Star Properties, LLC -southwest corner of Black Cat and Ustick Roads: Item G. Tabled from September 5, 2000: Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: PP 00-009 Request for Preliminary Plat approval for 78.4 acres with 263 building lots and 12 other lots for proposed Autumn Faire Subdivision by Gem Star Properties - southwest corner of Black Cat and Ustick Roads: Item H. Tabled from September 5, 2000: Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: VAC 00-005 Request for vacation of the alley intersecting East 1St between Pine Avenue and Idaho Street on the east side currently in an OT zone for Generations Plaza by Gary Benoit -East 1 St and East Pine Avenue: Item I. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: AZ 00-016 Request for annexation and zoning of 10.19 acres from RT to R-8 for proposed Wilkins Ranch Village planned-unit development by Steiner Development, LLC -south of Ustick Road and east of Black Cat Road: Item J. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: PP 00-016 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 48 building lots with 1 existing home and 5 other lots on 10.19 acres for proposed Wilkins Ranch Village planned-unit development by Steiner Development, LLC - south of Ustick Road and east of Black Cat Road: Item K. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: CUP 00-040 Request for Conditional Use Permit for proposed Wilkins Ranch Village planned-unit development consisting of 48 single-family lots ranging from 5,252 s.f. to 9,525 s.f. in a proposed R-8 zone by Steiner Development -south of Ustick Road and east of Black Cat Road: Item L. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: VAR 00-017 Request for variance from the maximum 1,000-foot block length for Bear Creek Subdivision by Briggs Engineering -east of Stoddard Lane and south of Overland Road: Meridian City Council Meeting ~'~\ September 19, 2000 Page 3 /~~, Item M. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: VAC 00-005 Request for vacation of public utilities, drainage and irrigation easement along common lot line between Lots 22 and 23 of Block 10, The Lakes at Cherry Lane No. 6, by Ron Leslie: Item N. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: VAC 00-007 Request for vacation of public utilities, drainage and irrigation easement along common lot line between Lots 35 and 36, Block 17 of Haven Cove Subdivision No. 9 by Glenn Blaser -east of Ten Mile Road and north of Pine Avenue on Ebbtide Street: Item O. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: VAR 00-013 Request for a variance of the 1,000-foot maximum block length for proposed Bridgetower Subdivision by Primeland Development Co., LLP, in a proposed R-4 zone -north of Ustick Road and east of Ten Mile Road: Item P. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: AZ 00-017 Request for annexation and zoning of 52.90 acres from RT to R-4 by Primeland Development Co., LLP, for proposed Bridgetower Subdivision -north of Ustick Road and east of Ten Mile Road: Item Q. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: PP 00-017 Request for Preliminary Plat approval for proposed Bridgetower Subdivision with 106 building lots, 1 HOA recreation center, 1 park lot and 19 common lots on 46.2 acres in a proposed R-4 zone by Primeland Development Co., LLP -north of Ustick Road and east of Ten Mile Road: Item R. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: CUP 00-043 Request for Conditional Use Permit to construct aplanned-unit development consisting of 106 building lots by Primeland Development Co., LLP for proposed Bridgetower Subdivision - north of Ustick Road and east of Ten Mile Road: Item S. Development Agreement: Packard Acres Subdivision with Packard Estates Development, LLC: Item T. New Beer and Liquor License: Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar by Restaurant Concepts II, LLC - 1460 North Eagle Road: Item U. Resolution No. 336: For first addendum for franchise agreement to perform solid waste collection for SSI to provide for the addition of recycling program: ,.` .r:- Meridian City Council Meeting September 19, 2000 Page 4 Item V. Resolution No. 337: To provide for the increase in rates and set solid waste collection rates: Corrie: Okay, Council. You have the Consent Agenda in front of you. What would you like to do with that? Bird: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: Item B we'd like to table to October 3, 2000; Item D tabled to October 3, 2000; We'd like to pull Item F to 1 F on the regular agenda; pull Item G to 1 G on the regular agenda; pull Item H to 1 H on the regular agenda; and U, the number is 336, Resolution No. 336; and V is Resolution No. 337. With that I would make a motion that we approve the Consent Agenda as noted. McCandless: I'll second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded to approve the Consent Agenda with Item B being tabled until October 3rd and Item D to October 3rd and F, G and H would be pulled and be the first items on the regular agenda. Is there any further discussion? Hearing none. Roll-call vote, Mr. Berg. Roll-call: Anderson, aye; De Weerd, aye; Bird, aye; McCandless, aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item F. Tabled from September Conclusions of Law: AZ zoning of 101.4 acres from Subdivision by Gem Star Black Cat and Ustick Roads; 5, 2000: Findings of Facts and 00-009 Request for annexation and RT to R-4 for proposed Autumn Faire Properties, LLC -southwest corner of Corrie: Now, the Regular Agenda. We will take up Item F which is pulled from the Consent Agenda. This is the Item -Findings of Facts Conclusion of Law: AZ 00-009 -request for annexation and zoning of 101.4 acres from RT to R-4 for Autumn Faire Subdivision. Staff, comments. Nichols: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council. The revisions to the proposed findings after I received a letter from the attorney for the applicant pointed out some corrections that needed to be made. I can go through those fairly quickly. This is on the annexation and zoning. Page 1, we had incorrectly listed Langley Farms as the applicant, when in fact it was Gem Star Properties, so we made that correction. Then down to page 6 -what previously was Item 16.8 and 16.10 in the previous ones were duplications, so we just left 16.8 and moved the rest of them up. Then, the next item, which was also on page 6, which is Item 16.13 in the revised findings, they wanted us to designate where this pathway was going Theldaho ~~Statesman P.O. Box 40, Boise, Idaho 83707-0040 LEGAL ADVERTISING PROOF OF PUBLICATION Account # DTI# Identification Amount: 064514 447652 NOTICE OF HEARING $48.24 Ordered by: P.O. # Rate Run Dates NT MAY 12, 25, 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN Number of Lines 33 EAST IDAHO ST 2 9 . MERIDIAN, ID 83642 Affidavit Legal # 1 10379 JANICE HILDRETH, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That she is the Principal Clerk of The Idaho Statesman, a daily newspaper printed and published at Boise, Ada County, State of Idaho, and having a general circulation therein, and which said newspaper has been continuously and uninterruptedly published in said County during a period of twelve consecutive months prior to the first publication of the notice, a copy of which is attached hereto: that said notice was published in The Idaho Statesman, in conformity with Section 60-108, Idaho Code, as amended for: TWO consecutive weekly ~ single consecutive daily ~X odd skip insertion(s) beginning with the issue of: MAY 1 2 2001 and ending with the issue of: MAY 2 5 2001 a ;~ ,,,`'~~N~uuapq.,.i ~. ~. L• BRIG+ ,~ ~.~ :* PUB LAG COUNTY OF ADA On this 2 5 day of MAY in the year of 2001 before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared before me Janice Hildreth known or identified to me to be the person whose name subscribed to the within instrument, and being by me first duly sworn, declared that the state- ments therein are true, and acknowledged to me that she executed the same ~ _ •` Notary Public for Idahq/" Residing at: Boise, Idah((o ~ ,1 B My Commission expires: dU RE~E!'~ MA'(2 ~ ~"13~ ~:a%i-~liy~! Via' ACCTS. F~+YY,~`~~ r STATE OF IDAHO ) )SS July 13, 2000 CUP 00-032 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUIy 18, 2000 APPLICANT Ada County Highway District ITEM NO. "~ REQUEST Findings -CUP for 6.36 acres for proposed Park and Ride lot for 100 vehicles in a C-G zone - SW corner of Meridian Road and NE corner of Overland Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS See attached Findings ~~k¢cl~~~~ ~ C~~f b~ ~~~~~ f° f~'1 Contacted: ~~;'-1c~~ `~~-'~C ~e"~~{,r~L' ~t ~ Date: d °1f'~..j Phone: ~~i ~.~ ~~-` ;~~„~~' t ~` 4 t_- ~~ Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. !~ ~~; ~~ ~ ~` interoffice M E M O R A N D U M To: William G. Berg, Jr. From: William F. Nichol Subject: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT (PARK AND RIDE) File No.: CUP-00-032 Date: July 10, 2000 Will: J U L 1 1 2000 CI~`Y OF l~~I~~~~~i Please find attached the original FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS, pursuant to action of the Council, at their July 5, 2000, meeting. The Findings will be on the Council's agenda for their July 18, 2000, meeting. I have also attached the original of the ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, if the Council approves the FINDINGS. Please serve copies of both documents upon the Applicant and appropriate departments. If you have any questions please advise. msg/Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\Park and Ride\CI1cLtrCUPffcls&Order32 ~'"~ BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL 07-07-00 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PROPOSED PARK-AND-RIDE LOT FOR 100 VEHICLES IN A C-G ZONE LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MERIDIAN ROAD AND NORTHEAST CORNER OF OVERLAND ROAD, MERIDIAN, IDAHO Case No. CUP-00-032 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT, APPLICANT. The above entitled conditional use permit application having come before the City Council on July 5, 2000, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and appearing on behalf of the Applicant were: John Sharp, Design Engineer for Ada County Highway District, and Pat Nelson, and no one appeared in opposition, and the City Council having duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter and the Recommendations to City Council issued by the Planning and Zoning Commission who conducted a public hearing and the Council having heard and taken oral FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACHD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 1 OF 13 and written testimony, and having duly considered the matter, the City Council hereby makes the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order to-wit: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. A notice of a public hearing on the conditional use permit was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for July 5, 2000, before the City Council, the first publication appearing and written notice having been mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the property under consideration more than fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing and with the notice of public hearing having been posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said hearing and the copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and television stations as public service announcements; and the matter having been duly considered by the City Council at the July 5, 2000, public hearing; and the applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian, having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence. 2. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Idaho Code §67-6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code §§ 11-15-5 and 11-17-5 as evidenced by the Affidavit of Mailing, and the Affidavit of Publication and Proof of Posting filed with the staff report. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACHD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 2 OF 13 /'\ 3. This proposed development request is in a C-G zone, by reason of the provisions of the Meridian City Code § 11-17-4, a public hearing was required before the City Council on this application. 4. The property is located at the northeast corner of State Highway 69 and Meridian Road, Meridian, Idaho. 5. The owner of record of the subject property is J.L. Boyd Company of Boise. 6. Applicant is Ada County Highway District. 7. The subject property is currently zoned C-G. The zoning district of C-G is defined within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-7- 2I~. 8. The proposed application requests a conditional use permit fora 100 vehicle park and ride lot. The C-G zoning designation within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance requires a conditional use permit be obtained for most uses including those requested by the Applicant. (Meridian City Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-8-1). 9. The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission recognizes that the proposed application is in compliance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 10. Tl1e use proposed within the subject application will in fact, constitute a conditional use as determined by City Ordinance. 11. The Meridian City Council takes notice and recognizes the Planning and FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACHD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 3 OF 13 Zoning Commission's recognition of the concerns of the following, Sidney Harmon, homeowners representative for the Country Terrace Subdivision, Larry Chetwood, President of Meridian Ford, the manager of the JBs restaurant, Marlc Freeman, attorney for Colleen Cope, a homeowner. 12. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Zoning, Subdivision and Development Ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City Code and all current zoning maps thereof and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, and Maps and the Ordinance establishing the Impact Area Boundary. 13. Giving due consideration to the comment received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the following conditions of development are imposed and the following is also found to be required to mitigate the effects of the proposed use and development upon services delivered by political subdivisions providing services to the subject real property within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian: 14. The proposed uses within the subject application will be harmonious with and in accordance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance because: 14.1 The subject property is designated on the "Generalized Land Use Map" as "Commercial". 15. The uses proposed within the subject application subject to the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER. GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACHD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 4 OF 13 .--1 P'`ti conditions herein ordered will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance or intended character of the general vicinity and that such uses will not change the intended essential character of the same area. 16. The uses proposed within the subject application will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. 17. The uses proposed within the subject application will be served adequately by central public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer. 18. The uses proposed within the subject application will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. 19. The development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of natural or scenic feature of major importance relating to the property. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975" hereinafter referred to for convenience as the "Act" codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (LC. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council may exercise all the powers required and authorized under the "Act" except the power to adopt ordinances by the establishment of FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACHD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 5 OF 13 !'r a Planning and Zoning Commission by ordinance pursuant to Idaho Code Section 67- 6504 which the City Council of the City of Meridian has established by the passage of the "City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance" at Titles XI and XII, Chapter I, Meridian City Code. 3. As part of a zoning ordinance the City Council can, subject to hearing and notice provision required, provide for the process of special and/or conditional use permits which a proposed use is otherwise prohibited by the terms of the ordinance but allowed with conditions under the specific provisions of the ordinance which the City of Meridian has done in the adoption of its zoning ordinances. 4. The City Council has the duty and responsibility to review the facts and circumstances of each application for special use permit to determine prior to granting the same that the evidential showing supports the finding that the following standards are met and that the proposed development: (Meridian City Code § 11-17-3 ) a. Will, in fact, constitute a conditional use as determined by City policy; b. Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and this Ordinance; c. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; d. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; e. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACRD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 6 OF 13 ~-~• l'~ sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; f. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; g. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, srnolce, fumes, glare or odors; h. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance. 5. Prior to granting a conditional use permit in a General Retail and Service Commercial District (C-G), a public hearing shall be conducted with notice to be published and provided to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the land under consideration for the conditional use permit all in accordance with the provisions of Meridian City Code § 11-17-5 City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, which provides as follows: "Prior to approving a Conditional Use Permit, the applicant and the Commission and Council shall follow notice and hearing procedures provided in Chapter 15 of this Title. Provided, however, that conditional use applications for land in Old Town and in industrial and commercial districts shall only be required to have one public hearing which shall be held before the Planning and Zoning Commission; and after the recommendation of the Commission is made, the application shall go before the City Council without a public hearing and the Council may approve, deny, or modify the recommendation of the Commission." 6. Following the public hearing and within 45 days after the conclusion of the public hearing the Commission shall, transmit its recommendations to the Meridian City Council with supportive reasons. The Commission shall recommend that the application FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACHD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 7 OF 13 /"`~ be approved, approved with conditions or denied. The Commission shall ensure that any approval or approval with conditions of an application shall be in accordance with Meridian Comprehensive Plan, City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, and Idaho State law. (Meridian City Code § 11-17-6) 7. When the City Council approves a conditional use permit it may impose conditions of that approval that reasonably: A. Minimize adverse impact on other development; B. Control the sequence and timing of development; C. Control the duration of development; D. Assure that the development is maintained properly; E. Designate the exact location and nature of the development; F. Require the provision for on-site public facilities or services; and G. Require more restrictive standards than those generally required, in this Ordinance. 8. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 21, 1993, Ord. 629, January 4, 1994 and Maps. DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THEABOVEAND FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does hereby ORDER and this does Order that: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACHD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 8 OF 13 1. That the above named applicant is granted a conditional use permit for a 100 vehicle park and ride lot, subject to the following conditions of use and development: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 1.1 Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. The ditches to be piped shall be shown on the site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Worlcs Department. 1.2 Off-street parking shall be in accordance with the design standards set forth in Section 11-13-4 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on- site. 1.3 Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Sections 11-13-4.D. and 11-13-4.E.-G. of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 1.4 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11- 14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 1.5 Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.I~. 1.6 .Provide street lights in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.M. The lights on the property will only shine 180°. 1.7 As part of a conditional use permit, the City of Meridian may impose additional restrictions/conditions. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACHD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 9 OF 13 ~, /""`~ 1.8 No new municipal sewer or water service is being requested by ACHD to serve the site (no restroom). The only public amenities proposed are a pay phone, transit shelters and security bicycle lockers, none of which require City services. 1.9 City Ordinance 11-2-2 defines "Subdivision" as the "result of an act of dividing an original lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more parts. The term "subdivision" shall also include the dedication of a public street.. ." The dedication of new road right-of-way on this parcel, therefore, will require a preliminary and final plat in order to create the two separate legal parcels noted on the Site Plan. The Park & Ride Lot shall proceed with the condition that a Preliminary Plat application be submitted prior to any development on the proposed 3.25-acre parcel east of the subject lot. So, under this scenario, the CUP could be approved and the Park Sz Ride Lot constructed with this condition attached for the 3.25-acre parcel. 1.10 The proposed roadway also exceeds the Meridian City Ordinance Section 12-4-2-B., which states that no street which ends in a cul-de-sac or a dead- end shall be longer than four hundred fifty feet (450'). Avariance from this section shall be required for the City to approve public road dedication and a plat. 1.11 No trash enclosures or containers are shown on the Site Plan. The Applicant shall detail if and/or where they intend to provide trash receptacles, size, exact location, etc. 1.12 Ordinance 12-4-7 requires a minimum of 20-foot wide planting strip be constructed next to incompatible features. This use is incompatible with the single family residence adjacent to the south (Cope property). Therefore, the landscape strip shown along the south boundary shall be increased from 15 feet (as shown) to 20 feet wide. The Applicant shall construct either a 3-4 foot high screening wall in front of the 16 parking spaces that head-in to the south property line OR provide a dense landscape screen that will provide an effective buffer within three (3) years from date of lot completion. In order to accommodate the five-foot-wide increased buffer on the south side, reducing the 40-foot wide buffer along 1-84 to 35 feet would suffice. As 1-84 and SH69 are both designated as entryway corridors, a 35-foot minimum landscape buffer adjacent to the roadways shall be a condition of approval. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACHD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 10 OF 13 /"~ 2. The conditions shall be reviewable by the Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-17-9. 3. The above conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application for a conditional use permit. 4. That the City Attorney draft an Order Granting Conditional Use Permit in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which maybe adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the conditional use permit may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. ¢t, By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the ~ ~ '- day of ~~ , 2000. ROLL CALL: COUNCILMAN RON ANDERSON VOTED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACHD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 12 OF 13 /"~, 1.13 Applicant shall provide a detailed landscape plan for review and approval with submittal for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. Said Certificate of Zoning Compliance shall be required prior to breaking ground in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-19-1. 1.14 The Site Plan shows four (4) trees within the Ten Mile Drain easement. A License Agreement with Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District granting approval for the trees within their easement shall be submitted prior to the City granting final approval for the site. If such an Agreement cannot be obtained, the trees cannot be omitted and must be relocated to another location within the site. 1.15 The Site Plan does not show any trees within the interior lot planting islands. A minimum of I four (4) shade trees shall be added to these planters in order to provide improved aesthetics and cooling to the lot interior. 1.16 No van-accessible parking stall (8-foot access aisle) is shown on the Site Plan. At least one of the aisles shall be widened to 8 feet to provide better van accessibility. 1.17 No signage details were submitted with the application other than standard ADA handicap parking signs. Standard highway district signage is anticipated, but this shall be clarified by the Applicant. The City P&Z Department would request ACHD's cooperation to be able to review any signs proposed to identify the site beyond the normal street directional signage. 1.18. The Destination 2015 Plan lists the 1-84/Meridian Road Interchange improvement under the future project list. It calls for a cloverleaf design to facilitate 1-84 westbound traffic onto SH69 southbound. The future design of the interchange could possibly significantly impact the subject parcel. The Applicant shall address this issue with ITD and clarify to the City how the future interchange design may impact the Park &. Ride Lot. Comments shall be included to City Council regarding traffic and the widening of the roads around Franklin and Meridian Roads, in addition to discussion made on the record. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACHD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 11 OF 13 COUNCILPERSON KEITH BIRD VOTED_1~~~-` v COUNCILMAN TAMMY deWEERD VOTED_~~ COUNCILMAN CHERIE McCANDLESS VOTED-^~~. MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) VOTED DATED: 7-. ~` _c~U MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: Copy served upon Applicant, Planning and Zoning Department, Public Worlcs Department and the City Attorney. By: City Clerlc msp~Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\Park and Ride\CUPFindings032 Dated: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACHD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 13 OF 13 /"'~ BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL 07-07-00 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT, FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PROPOSED PARK-N-RIDE LOT FOR 100 VEHICLES IN A C-G ZONE LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MERIDIAN ROAD AND NORTHEAST CORNER OF OVERLAND ROAD, MERIDIAN, IDAHO CASE NO. CUP-00-032 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT This matter coming before the City Council on the 18TH day of July, 2000, under the provisions of Meridian City Code § 11-17-4 for final action on conditional use permit application and the Council having received and approving the Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission the Council takes the following action: 1. That the Applicant of the property is granted a conditional use permit fora 100 vehicle park and ride lot, the proposed application request of a conditional use permit for the construction, development, maintenance and use fora 100 vehicle park and ride lot, as described in the "PLAN, DESIGNED: JOHN W. SHARP, CADD FILE NAME: 6545VMO1.DGN, DRAWING DATE: 4/00, FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO.: CM-0100(148), REGION 10, IDAHO, COUNTY: ADA, I~EY NUMBER: 6545, SHEET 1 OF 1, SHARP & SMITH, INC., Architects, IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT, Developer, for the development of the aforementioned development for a development consisting of a 100 vehicle park and ride lot and. which property is described in the attached Exhibit "A", and incorporated as if set forth in full hereat. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -PAGE 1 OF 5 BY ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT / CUP-00-032 2. That the above named applicant is granted a conditional use permit fora 100 vehicle park and ride lot, located at the southwest corner of Meridian Road, the northeast corner of Overland Road, Meridian, Idaho, subject to the following conditions of use and development: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 2.1 Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. The ditches to be piped shall be shown on the site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Worlcs Department. 2.2 Off-street parking shall be in accordance with the design standards set forth in Section 11-13-4 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 2.3 Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Sections 11-13-4.D. and 11-13-4.E.-G. of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 2.4 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 2.5 Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.I<. 2.6 Provide street lights in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12- 5-2.M. The lights on the property will only shine 180°. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -PAGE 2 OF 5 BY ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT / CUP-00-032 ,~ 2.7 As part of a conditional use permit, the City of Meridian may impose additional restrictions/conditions. 2.8 No new municipal sewer or water service is being requested by ACHD to serve the site (no restroom). The only public amenities proposed are a pay phone, transit shelters and security bicycle lockers, none of which require City services. 2.9 City Ordinance 11-2-2 defines "Subdivision" as the "result of an act of dividing an original lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more parts. The term "subdivision" shall also include the dedication of a public street..." The dedication of new road right-of-way on this parcel, therefore, will require a preliminary and final plat in order to create the two separate legal parcels noted on the Site Plan. The Parlc & Ride Lot shall proceed with the condition that a Preliminary Plat application be submitted prior to any development on the proposed 3.25-acre parcel east of the subject lot. So, under this scenario, the CUP could be approved and the Park & Ride Lot constructed with this condition attached for the 3.25-acre parcel. 2.10 The proposed roadway also exceeds the Meridian City Ordinance Section 12-4-2-B., which states that no street which ends in a cul-de- sac or a dead-end shall be longer than four hundred fifty feet (450'). A variance from this section shall be required for the City to approve public road dedication and a plat. 2.11 No trash enclosures or containers are shown on the Site Plan. The Applicant shall detail if and/or where they intend to provide trash receptacles, size, exact location, etc. 2.12 Ordinance 12-4-7 requires a minimum of 20-foot wide planting strip be constructed next to incompatible features. This use is incompatible with the single family residence adjacent to the south (Cope property). Therefore, the landscape strip shown along the south boundary shall be increased from 15 feet (as shown) to 20 feet wide. The Applicant shall construct either a 3-4 foot high screening wall in front of the 16 parking spaces that head-in to the south property line OR provide a dense landscape screen that will provide ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -PAGE 3 OF 5 BY ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT / CUP-00-032 an effective buffer within three (3) years from date of lot completion. In order to accommodate the five-foot-wide increased buffer on the south side, reducing the 40-foot wide buffer along 1-84 to 35 feet would suffice. As 1-84 and SH69 are both designated as entryway corridors, a 35-foot minimum landscape buffer adjacent to the roadways shall be a condition of approval. 2.13 Applicant shall provide a detailed landscape plan for review and approval with submittal for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. Said Certificate of Zoning Compliance shall be required prior to breaking ground in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-19-1. 2.14 The Site Plan shows four (4) trees within the Ten Mile Drain easement. A License Agreement with Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District granting approval for the trees within their easement shall be submitted prior to the City granting final approval for the site. If such an Agreement cannot be obtained, the trees cannot be omitted and must be relocated to another location within the site. 2.15 The Site Plan does not show any trees within the interior lot planting islands. A minimum of I four (4) shade trees shall be added to these planters in order to provide improved aesthetics and cooling to the lot interior. 2.16 No van-accessible parking stall (8-foot access aisle) is shown on the Site Plan. At least one of the aisles shall be widened to 8 feet to provide better van accessibility. 2.17 No signage details were submitted with the application other than standard ADA handicap parking signs. Standard highway district signage is anticipated, but this shall be clarified by the Applicant. The City P&Z Department would request ACHD's cooperation to be able to review any signs proposed to identify the site beyond the normal street directional signage. 2.18 The Destination 2015 Plan lists the 1-84/Meridian Road Interchange improvement under the future project list. It calls for a cloverleaf design to facilitate 1-84 westbound traffic onto SH69 southbound. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -PAGE 4 OF 5 BY ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT / CUP-00-032 ~, The future design of the interchange could possibly significantly impact the subject parcel. The Applicant shall address this issue with ITD and clarify to the City how the future interchange design may impact the Parlc Sz Ride Lot. Comments shall be included to City Council regarding traffic and the widening of the roads around Franklin and Meridian Roads, in addition to discussion made on the record. 3. The above conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application for a conditional use permit. 4. Notice to Permit Holder, this conditional use permit is not transferable without complying with the provisions of Meridian City Code § 11-17-8, a copy of which is attached to this permit. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 2000. day of Robert D. Corrie, Mayor City of Meridian Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: City Clerk Dated: msg/Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\Park and Ride\CUPOrder32 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -PAGE 5 OF 5 BY ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT / CUP-00-032 n A parcel of land being a portion of Government Tot ~ _ Lion 18, T.3N., R.IE:, B,M,~ Ada County, Idaho and mare particularlyldescribed as follows: Beginning at a brass cap marking the Southwest: corner of the said Govern- ment Lot 4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 18; thence North 89°43'32" East 701.34 feet along L•he Southerly boundary of the said Goverrnnent Lot 4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 5.8, which is also the centerline of Overland Road, to a point; thence North 0°45'10" East 25.00 feet to an iron pin on the Northerly right- of-way line of the said overland Road, also said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 0°45'10" East 949,1.J. feet: to a highcJay right:-of-way monument marking a point of beginning of curve on t_•he proposed Southerly rigI~C- of-way line of Ramp B-C of Interstate Highway 80 North, Federal Aid Project No. I-80N-1(74)44; thence along the said proposed Southeastery right-of-way Line of Ramp B-C of Interstate Highway 80 North along a curve to t:l~e left 320.58 fee L-, said curve having a central angle of 9°57'22", a radius of. 1,844.8b feet, tangents of 160.69 feet and a long chord of 320.17 feet bearing Sot~tt~ 66°00'45" West to an iron piyi marking a point of tangent; thence South 6I°02'04" West 388.26 feet a.3.on~; t:he said proposed. Sout}~easterl.y right-of-way line of Ramp B-C of Interstate IIighway 80 North to an iron piii o~z t:lie Easterly right-of-way line of State Highway No. 6~, as shown on Federal Aid Project No. I-80N-1(12)37; thence South 1°02'04" West 183.85 feet along the said Easterl~T right-of-Stay lice of State Highway No. 69 to an iron pin; thence South 6°51`05" West 52.00 feet along the sa~.ci Easterly right-of-wa5~ line of State Highway No. 69 to an iron pin; thence North 89°28'42" East 574.55 feet L-o an iron pin; thence South 0°45'10" West 400.94 feet to an iron pin. on the said Northerly right-of-way line of Overland Road; thence North 89°43'32" East 60.OI feet along the said. Northerly right-oL•- Way line of Overland Road to the point of beginning, comprising 6.363 acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO: A 50.00 foot easement lying 50.00 feet Northeasterly of and adjacent with the centerline of Tenm{le Creek. E ~ib~t ~. V.H. MOORE C O M P A N Y Real Estate Development TELEPHONE (208) 323.1919 /FAX 323-7523 600 N. STEELHEAD WAY, SUITE 144 (83704) P.O. BOX 8204 BOISE, IDAH083707.2204 Date: July 14, 2000 To: William G. Berg, Jr. City Clerk City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 From: Jonathan R. Seel Subject: Park & Ride CUP-00-32 ~~~ LU~L; a r On June 9, 2000 the City of Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard an application for a Park & Ride for land located at Meridian Road and I-84. ACHD was the applicant and Winston Moore the land owner. The staff report for the Park & Ride required curb, gutter and sidewalk (sidewalks) the entire length of the public road (from Overland to the project) that ACHD is to construct as part of this project. ACHD on the other hand wanted to construct a 28 foot asphalt road with only sidewalk along that portion disignated for the Park & Ride. In other words, the balance of the street would be a 28 foot asphalt section. We supported staff's recommendation and same was so approved by the Commission. This week we were informed that the City Council had heard this application and removed the requirement for sidewalks, except for the Park & Ride parcel. This was apparently based on comments from ACHD that they did not want to construct sidewalks the entire length of the future road. We question the procedural aspects of the hearing for the Park & Ride and submit our concerns for your consideration. Specifically: • We have been advised that the City Council hearing was not a public hearing. If so why was ACRD, as we understand it, able to present information to the Council that the project was over budget and they could not construct sidewalks the entire length of the proposed public road. And if they did speak, should not the public have had the opportunity to refute their comments? • Which brings me to the second issue. We were not notified of the Council hearing. Given we are the land owner, should we not have been notified? If the City does not notify the public, then the Council should have a closed hearing and no one should be able to present facts to the Council. We regret any inconvenience this may cause the Council, but we believe this application should be reheard with an opportunity for Winston Moore to express his concerns. I look forward to receiving your response. ~, ou~tt ~ Iwcc ~~tv~~ct Judy Peavey-Derr, President 318 East 37th StrPPt "' ~ """ """"" Garden City, Idaho 83714-6499 Marlyss Meyer, Secretary Phone (208) 387-6100 Sherry R. Huber Commissioner Fax (208) 387-6391 Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner E-mail: tellus@achd.ada.id.us September 7, 2000 You're Invited to attend the Grand Opening of the Rackham Road Commuter Park c~C Ride Lot The new Commuter Park & Ride Lot will be officially opened in a ribbon cutting ceremony on Thursday, September 14, 2000, during National Try Transit Week. The ceremony will take place at 11:00 AM at the lot, located on Rackham Road, which is north of Overland, just east of Eagle Road. This is the first lot that the Highway District has constructed and is complete with bike lockers and a covered transit shelter. The lot has been a cooperative effort between the Ada County Highway District and the Idaho Transportation Department. The land was donated by ITD, with construction costs funded from a Congestion Mitigation Air Quality grant with ACRD providing the local matching funds. It will accommodate twenty-five commuters. Please make plans to join us at the ceremony! Sincerely, Pat Nelson Commuteride Coordinator ~CE~D SEP - g 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN r, n BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL FaE Corr Revised 07-19-00 IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PROPOSED PARK-AND-RIDE LOT FOR 100 VEHICLES IN A C-G ZONE LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MERIDIAN ROAD AND NORTHEAST CORNER OF OVERLAND ROAD, MERIDIAN, IDAHO ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT, APPLICANT. Case No. CUP-00-032 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The above entitled conditional use permit application having come before the City Council on July 5, 2000, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and appearing on behalf of the Applicant were: John Sharp, Design Engineer for Ada County Highway District, and Pat Nelson, and no one appeared in opposition, and the City Council having duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter and the Recommendations to City Council issued by the Planning and Zoning Commission who conducted a public hearing and the Council having heard and taken oral FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACRD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 1 OF 13 h4 r and written testimony, and having duly considered the matter, the City Council hereby makes the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order to-~vit: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. A notice of a public hearing on the conditional use permit was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for July 5, 2000, before the City Council, the first publication appearing and written notice having been mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the property under consideration more than fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing and with the notice of public hearing having been posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said hearing and the copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and television stations as public service announcements; and the matter having been duly considered by the City Council at the July 5, 2000, public hearing; and the applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions providing services within. the Planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian, having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence. 2. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Idaho Code §67-6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code §§ 11-15-5 and 11-I7-5 as evidenced by the Affidavit of Mailing, and the Affidavit of Publication and Proof of Posting filed with the staff report. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACRD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 2 OF 13 .: n 3. This proposed development request is in a C-G zone, by reason of the provisions of the Meridian City Code § 11-17-4, a public hearing was required before the City Council on this application. 4. The property is located at the northeast corner of State Highway 69 and Meridian Road, Meridian, Idaho. 5. The owner of record of the subject property is J.L. Boyd Company of Boise. 6. Applicant is Ada County Highway District. 7. The subject property is currently zoned C-G. The zoning district of C-G is defined within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-7- 2I~. 8. The proposed application requests a conditional use permit fora 100 vehicle park and ride lot. The C-G zoning designation within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance requires a conditional use permit be obtained for most uses including those requested by the Applicant. (Meridian City Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-8-1). 9. The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission recognizes that the proposed application is in compliance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 10. The use proposed within the subject application will in fact, constitute a conditional use as determined by City Ordinance. 11. The Meridian City Council takes notice and recognizes the Planning and FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACHD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 3 OF i3 ~ ~"~ Zoning Commission's recognition of the concerns of the following, Sidney Harmon, homeowners representative for the Country Terrace Subdivision, Larry Chetwood, President of Meridian Ford, the manager of the JBs restaurant, Marlc Freeman, attorney for Colleen Cope, a homeowner. 12. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Zoning, Subdivision and Development Ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City Code and all current zoning maps thereof and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, and Maps and the Ordinance establishing the Impact Area Boundary. 13. Giving due consideration to the comment received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the following conditions of development are imposed and the following is also found to be required to mitigate the effects of the proposed use and development upon services delivered by political subdivisions providing services to the subject real property within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian: 14. The proposed uses within the subject application will be harmonious with and in accordance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance because: 14.1 The subject property is designated on the "Generalized Land Use Map" as "Commercial". 15. The uses proposed within the subject application subject to the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACHD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 4 OF 13 ~'1 conditions herein ordered will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance or intended character of the general vicinity and that such uses will not change the intended essential character of the same area. 16. The uses proposed within the subject application will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. 17. The uses proposed within the subject application will be served adequately by central public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer. 18. The uses proposed within the subject application will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. 19. The development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of natural or scenic feature of major importance relating to the property. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975" hereinafter referred to for convenience as the "Act" codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (LC. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council may exercise all the powers required and authorized under the "Act" except the power to adopt ordinances by the establishment of FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACHD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 5 OF 13 ~ ~ a Planning and Zoning Commission by ordinance pursuant to Idaho Code Section 67- 6504 which-the City Council of the City of Meridian has established by the passage of the "City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance" at Titles XI and XII, Chapter I, Meridian City Code. 3. As part of a zoning ordinance the City Council can, subject to hearing and notice provision required, provide for the process of special and/or conditional use permits which a proposed use is otherwise prohibited by the terms of the ordinance but allowed with conditions under the specific provisions of the ordinance which the City of Meridian has done in ,the adoption of its zoning ordinances. 4. The City Council has the duty and responsibility to review the facts and circumstances of each application for special use permit to determine prior to granting the same that the evidential showing supports the finding that the following standards are met and that the proposed development: (Meridian City Code § 11-17-3 ) a. Will, in fact, constitute a conditional use as determined by City policy; b. Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and this Ordinance; c. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; d. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; e. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACRD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 6 OF 13 ^ r'. sewer or that the person responsible For the establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; f. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; g. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; h. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance. 5. Prior to granting a conditional use permit in a General Retail and Service Commercial District (C-G), a public hearing shall be conducted with notice to be published and provided to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the land under consideration for the conditional use permit all in accordance with the provisions of Meridian City Code § 11-17-5 City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, which provides as follows: "Prior to approving a Conditional Use Permit, the applicant and the Commission and Council shall follow notice and hearing procedures provided in Chapter 15 of this Title. Provided,. however, that conditional use applications for land in Old Town and in industrial and commercial districts shall only be required to have one public hearing which shall be held before the Planning and Zoning Commission; and after the recommendation of the Commission is made, the application shall go before the City Council without a public hearing and the Council may approve, deny, or modify the recommendation of the Commission." 6. Following the public hearing and within 45 days after the conclusion of the public hearing the Commission shall, transmit its recommendations to the Meridian City Council with supportive reasons. The Commission shall recommend that the application FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACHD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 7 OF 13 ,•_.. be approved, approved with conditions or denied. The Commission shall ensure that any approval or approval with conditions of an application shall be in accordance with Meridian Comprehensive Plan, City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, and Idaho State law. (Meridian City Code § 11-17-6) 7. When the City Council approves a conditional use permit it may impose conditions of that approval that reasonably: A. Minimize adverse impact on other development; B. Control the sequence and timing of development; C. Control the duration of development; D. Assure that the development is maintained properly; E. Designate the exact location and nature of the development; F. Require the provision for on-site public facilities or services; and G. Require more restrictive standards than those generally required, in this Ordinance. 8. T'ne City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 21, 1993, Ord. 629, January 4, 1994 and Maps. DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THEABOVEAND FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does hereby ORDER and this does Order that: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACRD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 8 OF 13 1. That the above named applicant is granted a conditional use permit for a 100 vehicle park and ride lot, subject to the following conditions of use and development: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 1.1 Any e;cisting irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. The ditches to be piped shall be shown on the site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. 1.2 Off-street parking shall be in accordance with the design standards set forth in Section 11-13-4 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on- site. 1.3 Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Sections 11-13-4.D. and 11-13-4.E.-G. of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 1.4 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11- 14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 1.5 Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.K. 1.6 Provide street lights in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.M. The lights on the property will only shine 180°. 1.7 As part of a conditional use permit, the City of Meridian may impose additional restrictions/conditions. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACHD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 9 OF 13 ~ ~ 1.8 No new municipal sewer or water service is being requested by ACHD to serve the site (no restroom). The only public amenities proposed are a pay phone, transit shelters and security bicycle lockers, none of which require City services. 1.9 City Ordinance 11-2-2 defines "Subdivision" as the "result of an act of dividing an original lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more parts. The term "subdivision" shall also include the dedication of a public street.. ." The dedication of new road right-of--way on this parcel, therefore, will require a preliminary and final plat in order to create the t~vo separate legal parcels noted on the Site Plan. The Parlc &. Ride Lot shall proceed with the condition that a Preliminary Plat application be submitted prior to any development on the proposed 3.25-acre parcel east of the subject lot. So, under this scenario, the CUP could be approved and the Parlc Sz Ride Lot constructed with this condition attached for the 3.25-acre parcel. 1.10 The proposed roadway also exceeds the Meridian City Ordinance Section 12-4-2-B., which states that no street which ends in a cul-de-sac or a dead- end shall be longer than four hundred fifty feet (450'). Avariance from this section shall be required for the City to approve public road dedication and a plat. 1.11 It shall be required that the new 480-foot access road, serving as a commercially zoned parcel, off Overland shall be constructed as a commercial street section. The Park and Ride lot, pedestrian and bicycle access into the site from Overland Road shall be required to have sidewalk constructed on the east and north sides of the new access road. 1.12 No trash enclosures or containers are shown on the Site Plan. The Applicant shall detail if and/or where they intend to provide trash receptacles, size, exact location, etc. 1.13 Ordinance 12-4-7 requires a minimum of 20-foot wide planting strip be constructed next to incompatible features. This use is incompatible with the single familyresidence adjacent to the south (Cope property). Therefore, the landscape strip shown along the south boundary shall be increased from I5 feet (as shown) to 20 feet wide. The Applicant shall construct either a 3-4 foot high screening wall in front of the 16 parking spaces that head-in to the south property line OR provide a dense landscape screen that will provide FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACHD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 10 OF 13 ,~''~ ~ an effective buffer within three (3) ,years from date of lot completion. In order to accommodate the five-foot-wide increased buffer on the south side, reducing the 40-foot wide buffer along 1-84 to 35 feet would suffice. As 1-84 and SH69 are both designated as entryway corridors, a 35-foot minimum landscape buffer adjacent to the roadways shall be a condition of approval. 1.14 Applicant shall provide a detailed landscape plan for review and approval with submittal for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. Said Certificate of Zoning Compliance shall be required prior to breaking ground in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-19-1. 1.15 The Site Plan shows four (4) trees within the Ten Mile Drain easement. A License Agreement with Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District granting approval for the trees within their easement shall be submitted prior to the City granting final approval for the site. If such an Agreement cannot be obtained, the trees cannot be omitted and must be relocated to another location within the site. 1.16 The Site Plan does not show any trees within the interior lot planting islands. A minimum of I four (4) shade trees shall be added to these planters in order to provide improved aesthetics and cooling to the lot interior. 1.17 No van-accessible parking stall (8-foot access aisle) is shown on the Site Plan. At least one of the aisles shall be widened to 8 feet to provide better van accessibility. 1.18 No signage details were submitted with the application other than standard ADA handicap parking signs. Standard highway district signage is anticipated, but this shall be clarified by the Applicant. The City P&Z Department would request ACHD's cooperation to be able to review any signs proposed to identify the site beyond the normal street directional signage. 1.19 The Destination 2015 Plan lists the 1-84/Meridian Road Interchange improvement under the future project list. It calls fora .cloverleaf design to facilitate 1-84 westbound traffic onto SH69 southbound. The future design of the interchange could possibly significantly impact the subject parcel. The Applicant shall address this issue with ITD and clarify to the City how the future interchange design may impact the Parlc Sz Ride Lot. Comments shall be included to City Council regarding traffic and the widening of the roads FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACHD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 11 OF 13 around Franklin and Meridian Roads, in addition to discussion made on the record. 2. The conditions shall be reviewable by the Council pursuant to Meridian City J Code § 11-17-9. 3. The above conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application for a conditional use perrrut. 4. That the City Attorney draft an Order Granting Conditional Use Permit in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which maybe adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the conditional use permit may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the `~~~' da Y of 7Z /n , 2000. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACHD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 12 OF 13 ~-. ,,..~ ROLL CALL: COUNCILMAN RON ANDERSON VOTED ~- COUNCILPERSON KEITH BIRD VOTED_ \~~~ COUNCILMAN TAMMY deWEERD VOTED_ 1'~~ COUNCILMAN CHERIE McCANDLESS VOTED MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) VOTED .~ DATED:~~-~D MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: Copy served upon Applicant, Planning and Zoning Department, Public Worlcs Department and the City Attorney. By. .~. -~ City Clerk msg/Z:\Work\MUVleridian 15360NMark and Ride\CUPFindings032 Dated: ~~'~~0~ ~t~1ti1~ tt» i--lliirei f' .~~ ~ fri V ~ ~ ~~ _r =~9~ ,~~ -,, Qq , r ~'sc ' ,, ,~~ ,,~~~~~~urut sNtttN~`~`````y FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS BY: ACRD IN C-G ZONE /CUP-00-032 PAGE 13 OF 13 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL Revised 07-19-00 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT, FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PROPOSED PARK-N-RIDE LOT FOR 100 VEHICLES IN A C-G ZONE LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MERIDIAN ROAD AND NORTHEAST CORNER OF OVERLAND ROAD, MERIDIAN, IDAHO CASE NO. CUP-00-032 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT This matter coming before the City Council on the 18~ day of July, 2000, under the provisions of Meridian City Code § 11-17-4 for final action on conditional use permit application and the Council having received and approving the Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission the Council takes the following action: 1. That the Applicant of the property is granted a conditional use permit fora 100 vehicle park and ride lot, the proposed application request of a conditional use permit for the construction, development, maintenance and use fora 100 vehicle park and ride lot, as described in the "PLAN, DESIGNED: JOHN W. SHARP, CADD FILE NAME: 6545VMOl .DGN, DRAWING DATE: 4/00, FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO.: CM-0100(148), REGION 10, IDAHO, COUNTY: ADA, I~EY NUMBER: 6545, SHEET 1 OF 1, SHARP &. SMITH, INC., Architects, IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT, Developer, for the development of the aforementioned development for a development consisting of a 100 vehicle park and ride lot and which property is described in the attached Exhibit "A", and incorporated as if set forth in full hereat. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -PAGE 1 OF 5 BY ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT / CUP-00-032 n 2. That the above named applicant is granted a conditional use permit fora 100 vehicle park and ride lot, located at the southwest corner of Meridian Road, the northeast corner of Overland Road, Meridian, Idaho, subject to the following conditions of use and development: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 2.1 Any existing irrigation drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. The ditches to be piped shall be shown on the site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. 2.2 Off-street parking shall be in accordance with the design standards set forth in Section 11-13-4 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 2.3 Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Sections 11-13-4.D. and 11-13-4.E.-G. of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 2.4 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 2.5 Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.I<. 2.6 Provide street lights in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12- 5-2.M. The lights on the property will only shine 180°. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -PAGE 2 OF 5 BY ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT / CUP-00-032 n ~"~, 2.7 As part of a conditional use permit, the City of Meridian may impose additional restrictions/conditions. 2.8 No new municipal sewer or water service is being requested by ACHD to serve the site (no restroom). The only public amenities proposed are a pay phone, transit shelters and security bicycle lockers, none of which require City services. 2.9 City Ordinance 11-2-2 defines "Subdivision" as the "result of an act of dividing an original lot, tract or parcel of land into t~vo (2) or more parts. The term "subdivision" shall also include the dedication of a public street..." The dedication of new road right-of-way on this parcel, therefore, will require a preliminary and final plat in order to create the two separate legal parcels noted on the Site Plan. The Parlc ~ Ride Lot shall proceed with the condition that a Preliminary Plat application be submitted prior to any development on the proposed 3.25-acre parcel east of the subject lot. So, under this scenario, the CUP could be approved and the Park & Ride Lot constructed with this condition attached for the 3.25-acre parcel. 2.10 The proposed roadway also exceeds the Meridian City Ordinance Section 12-4-2-B., which states that no street which ends in a cul-de- sac or a dead-end shall be longer than four hundred fifty feet (450'). A variance from this section shall be required for the City to approve public road dedication and a plat. 2.11 It shall be required that the new 480-foot access road, serving as a commercially zoned parcel, off Overland shall be constructed as a commercial street section. The Parlc and Ride lot, pedestrian and bicycle access into the site from Overland Road shall be required to have sidewalk constructed on the east and north sides of the new access road. 2.12 No trash enclosures or containers are shown on the Site Plan. The Applicant shall detail if and/or where they intend to provide trash receptacles, size, exact location, etc. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -PAGE 3 OF 5 BY ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT / CUP-00-032 !'1 r, 2.13 Ordinance 12-4-7 requires a minimum of 20-foot wide planting strip be constructed next to incompatible features. This use is incompatible with the single family residence adjacent to the south (Cope property). Therefore, the landscape strip shown along the south boundary shall be increased from 15 feet (as shown) to 20 feet wide. The Applicant shall construct either a 3-4 foot high screening wall in front of the 16 parking spaces that head-in to the south property line OR provide a dense landscape screen that will provide an effective buffer within three (3) years from date of lot completion. In order to accommodate the five-foot-wide increased buffer on the south side, reducing the 40-foot wide buffer along 1-84 to 35 feet would suffice. As 1-84 and SH69 are both designated as entryway corridors, a 35-foot minimum landscape buffer adjacent to the roadways shall be a condition of approval. 2.14 Applicant shall provide a detailed landscape plan for review and approval with submittal for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. Said Certificate of Zoning Compliance shall be required prior to breaking ground in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-19-1. 2.15 The Site Plan shows four (4) trees within the Ten Mile Drain easement. A License Agreement with Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District granting approval for the trees within their easement shall be submitted prior to the City granting final approval for the site. If such an Agreement cannot be obtained, the trees cannot be omitted and must be relocated to another location within the site. 2.16 The Site Plan does not show any trees within the interior lot planting islands. A minimum of I four (4) shade trees shall be added to these planters in order to provide improved aesthetics and cooling to the lot interior. 2.17 No van-accessible parking stall (8-foot access aisle) is shown on the Site Plan. At least one of the aisles shall be widened to 8 feet to provide better van accessibility. 2.18 No signage details were submitted with the application other than standard ADA handicap parking signs. Standard highway district ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -PAGE 4 OF 5 BY ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT / CUP-00-032 /'~ ,...~ signage is anticipated, but this shall be clarified by the Applicant. The City P&Z Department would request ACHD's cooperation to be able to review any signs proposed to identify the site beyond the normal street directional signage. 2.19 The Destination 2015 Plan lists the 1-84/Meridian Road Interchange improvement under the future project list. It calls for a cloverleaf design to facilitate 1-84 westbound traffic onto SH69 southbound. The future design of the interchange could possibly significantly impact the subject parcel. The Applicant shall address this issue with ITD and clarify to the City how the future interchange design may impact the Park SL Ride Lot. Comments shall be included to City Council regarding traffic and the widening of the roads around Franklin and Meridian Roads, in addition to discussion made on the record. 3. The above conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application for a conditional use permit. 4. Notice to Permit Holder, this conditional use permit is not transferable without complying with the provisions of Meridian City Code § 11-17-$, a copy of which is attached to this permit. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the l ~~ da of .a~~~ y 2000. D. Cowie, Mayor City of Meridian Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. `~,~`~~,,t,,t~,++a,,,,,'~~f~ r' ~ T~ By: Dated: ~._ ~~0 ~ s City Clerk x ~~~, - msg/Z:\Work\M~leridian 15360M\Park and Ride\CUPOrder32 7 ~~ ~4 ~, ~O T tst • ,~` ~ ~,~ ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -PAGE 5 OF 5 ,,'~~'~n,~~r~£'~ ~+t~~\\``\a\` BY ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT / CUP-00-032 8itt+ ttt31 A parcel of Land being a portion of Government Tot 4 of the SW 1/4 of Sec- tion 18, T.3N., R. L,, B „~,~ Ada County, Iaaho and more particularly desc_ibed as follows: Beg-?*.ning at a brass cap marking the Southwest' corner of t;Ze said Govern- ment Lot 4 of the SW 1/4 of Section l8; thence North 89°43`32" East 701.34 feet along L'he Southerly boundary of the said Gove_*;~ent Lot 4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 18s which is also the centerline of Overland Aoad, to a point; thence North 0°45'IO" East 25.00 feet to an j.ron p~~ on the Northerly right- of-way Zine of the said Overland Road, also saj.d point being the REAL POINT OF B-cGINNING; thence continuing North 0°45'10" East 949.1.1. feet. r_o a hight~ay right-of-~.~ay moment marking a point of beginning of curve on the proposed Southerly right- of-way line of Ramp B-C of Interstate Highway 80 North, Federal Aid Project No. I-80N-1(74)44; thence along the said proposed Southeastery right-of-Way Line of Ramp B-C of Interstate Highway 80 North along a curve to t_•l~e left 320.58 feet, said carve having a central angle of 9°57'22", a radius of. 1,844.8b feet, tangents of 100.69 feet and a long chord of 320.17 feet bearing South 66°00`4;" West to an j_ron pin marking a point of tangent; thence South 6I°02'04" West 388.26 feet a.~.ong t:he said proposed Sout}~easterJ.y right-of-c~ay line of Ramp B-C of Interstate IIighway 80 North to an iron pin on Clle Easterly right-of-gray line of State Highway No, 69, as shown on rederal Aid Project No, I-80N-1(12)37; thence South I°02'04" West 183.85 feet along t•_he said Easterly right-of-Way line of State Highway No. fig to an iron pin; thence South 6°51'0,51 West 52.00 feet along the sa~.d Easterly right-of-WaZ* line of S tote Highway No _ 69 to an iron pin; thence North 89°28'42" East 574.55 feat L'o an iron pin; thence South 0°45'10" West 400.94 feet to an iron pin. on the said Northerly right-of-tray line of overland Road; thence North 89°43'32" East 60.01 feet along the said. Northerly right-oi- way line of Overland Road to the point of beginn~.ng, comprising 6.363 acres, more or less. SUdTCT T0: A 50.00 foot easement lying 50.00 fee*_ Northeasterly o£ and adjacent with the centerline of Tenm{le Creek. E ;i~ib~t .~du ~ou~t~.~~~wu~ ~~~tN~~t 18 East wave ovens, vice rresiaen>: Garden City, Idaho 83714-6499 Marlyss Meyer, Secretary Phone (208) 387-6100 Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Fax (208) 387-6391 Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner E-mail: tellus@achd.ada.id us August 30, 2000 R,~C~~D Luc ~ o z~ca Mayor Robert Corrie and Ci~ ~F ME1L~INI~ Meridian City Council Members 33 E. Idaho St. Meridian ID 83642 Re: CUP 00-032 -Meridian - I-84-Overland Park 8 Ride Development Proposal The formal finding of facts on the above referenced project was to be discussed on Tuesday, September 5, 2000 agenda at the City Council meeting. The Ada County Highway District Commission has been considering all information on the site proposal and has deferred a decision on the site until after their September 6, 2000 meeting. Please consider this a request to postpone any discussion on the project until your September 19, 2000 meeting. This will allow my office to obtain direction from the District Commissioners and be better able to inform the Council of their decision. If you have further questions, please contact me at my office, 387-6162 Sincerely, c~/D~~ ~~ Pat Nelson Ridesharing Coordinator C: J Schweitzer Terry Little Steve Spickelmier John Sharp X:\Word -Letterhead & MemoWCHD Letter -with filename.doc AUG 30 '00 15 26 PAGE. 02 Ad^ County Highway ~~,trict 318 E. 37th Street Boise, ID 83714 (208) 38T-6100 (208) 38?-6391 FAX Please Deliver toy WILL BERG Fax #c 888-4218 Company: CITY OF MIIRIDIAN From Pat Nelson Fax #: (208) 387-6391 Phone: (208) 387-6100 Pages: 2 Message: AUG 30 '00 15 16 PAGE.01 ** TX CONFIR~ION REPORT ** DATE TIME TO/FROM 23 08/30 15 37 PUBLIC WORKS 24 08/30 15 38 LEGAL DEPARTMENT 25 08/30 15 39 208 888 6854 AS OF AUG 30 ';r~5~39 PAGE.01 CITY OF ~,~RIDIAN MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD# STATUS OF--S 00'13" 001 152 OK EC--S 00'25" 001 152 OK EC--S 00'22" 001 152 OK ~~cc ~ount ~ ~' / c'~ _ .J~tc hcva aUc~ t~ ~ ~ ~ cct udy Peavey Derr, President 318 East 37th Street )awe Rivana Viro Preci'lens Martyrs Meyer, Secretary Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner SUran S. Eartlake. Commicsinnor August 30, 2000 warden City, Idaho 83714.6499 Phone (208) 387-6100 Fax (208)387-6391 E-mail: tellus@achd.ada id.us R~CE~D A'JG 3 0 2000 Mayor Robert Corrie and C~ 0~' ~~~ Meridian City Council Members 33 E. Idaho St. Meridian ID 83642 Re: CUP 00-032 -Meridian - I-84-Overland Park & Ride Development Proposal The formal frnding of Facts on the above referenced project was to be discussed on Tuesday, September 5, 2000 agenda at the City Council meeting. The Ada County Highway District Commission has been considering all information on the site proposal and has deferred a decision on the site until after their September 6, 2000 meeting. Please consider this a request to postpone any discussion on the project until your September 19, 2000 meeting, This will allow my office to obtain direction from the District Commissioners and be better able to inform the Council of their decision, If you have further questions, please contact me at my office, 357-6162. Sincerely, Pat Nelson Ridesharing Coordinator C: J Schweitzer Terry Little Steve Spickelmier John Sharp Xawwd - Letterhead d MemetnCNl) Lettor- w8A filename doe AUG 30 '00 15 16 PAGE.02 Ads County Highway ~r ,trict 31$ E. 3 fith Street Boise, ID 83714 (208) 387-6100 (208) 38?-6391 FAX Please Deliver toy CITY CLERK WILL HERa Fax #'~ 688-4218 Company: CITY OF MERIDIAN Frotn~ Pat Nelson Fax #: (208) 367-6391 Phone: (208) 387-6100 Pages: 2 Message: ATTENTION CITY CLERR AGENDA ITIIM CHANGE REQUEST REQUEST TO DEFERR ACTION ON AGENDA-ITEM FOR TONIGHTI PLEASE MARE SURE CITY CLERK (OR REPLACEMENT FOR TONIGHT) GETS THIS REQUEST BEFORE THE MEETING TONIGHTI THANK YOU. PAT NELSON 387-6162 OR CELL 841-1513 AUG 01 '00 14 00 PAGE.01 -/d~da ~ountc~.Jrtic,~hcvacy aLJi~trict Judy Peavey-Derr, President Dave Bivens, Vice President 318 East 37th Street Marlyss Meyer, Secretary Garden City, Idaho 83714-6499 Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Phone (208) 387-6100 Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner Fax (208) 387-6391 E-mail: tellus@achd.ada.id.us August 1, 2000 Will Berg, City Clerk City of Meridian 33 E Idaho St. Meridian ID 83642 Re: Deferral Request for Meridian/Overland Park & Ride Lot Findings of Fact The formal findings of fact for the development application for a Park & Ride Lot at Meridian Road and Overland is scheduled to be considered on tonight's agenda by the Meridian City Council. The recent decision by the Council to reverse an earlier decision regarding the requirement for sidewalks on the proposed development was unexpected and will require further investigation by ACRD before making a decision to move forward on the project. In addition, the District is still in negotiations for acquisition of the property and it would be premature to bring this application forward without knowing the full cost of the project. Therefore, the Ada County Highway District respectfully requests that a deferral of this agenda item be granted for a period of 30 days, or September 5, 2000 to allow the District to explore the alternatives and total cost of the project. If you have any questions regarding the request, please contact me at 387-6162. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sincerely, o~ Pat Nelson Ridesharing Coordinator C: J Schweitzer, Director Terry Little S. Spickelmier x:lword -Letterhead & MemoWCHD Letter -with filename.doc AUG 01 '00 14:00 PAGE. 02 ~"'~ September 19, 2000 CUP 00-032 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 19, 2000 APPLICANT Ada County Highway District ITEM NO. E REQUEST Tabled from September 5, 2000 -Amended Findings -Request for CUP for 6.36 acres for proposed Park-and-Ride lotfor 100 vehicles in a C-G zone - SW corner of Meridian Road and NE Corner of Overland Road. AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS See previous item packet ~J~ c rr" OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the Cffy of Meridian. i'~ August 31, 2000 CUP 00-032 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 5, 2000 APPLICANT Ada County Highway District ITEM NO. E REQUEST Amended Findings -Request for CUP for 6.36 acres for proposed Park-and-Ride lot for 100 vehicles in a C-G zone - SW corner of Meridian Road and NE corner of Overland Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS See previous item packet Gi ~p,0o ~~ ~~ See attached Contacted: ~ ~(/~-~~~Date: / Q"D Phone: ~'~ ~~~ Materials presented at public meetings shall b~efcome property of the City of Meridian. x17 /'~. July 24, 2000 CUP 00-032 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING August 1, 2000 APPLICANT Ada County Highway District ITEM NO. g REQUEST Findings: CUIP for 6.36 acres for a proposed Park-and-Ride lot for 100 vehicles in a C-G zone - SW corner of Meridian Road and NE corner of Overland Road AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: COMMENTS See attached Findings /Order ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: 1 CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: I ~~~ ~ I~ NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: ~ ` '` SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: Contacted: Date: ~ a'~j Qo Phone: ~j~j7 ~(p ~ o D Materials presented art public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ` ~ ~~ RECEIVED interoffice u~ZOZ~a MEMORANDUM CITY O ~~rY CLERK OFFICE Toy William G. B From: William F. N Subject: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT (PARK AND RIDE) File No.: CUP-00-032 Date: July 19, 2000 Will: Please find attached the revised original FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND. DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS, pursuant to action of the Council at their July 18, 2000, meeting. Please note that on page 10 that a new 1.11 has been added from the Planning and Zoning Recommendations, and additionally all numbers thereafter have been re-numbered. I have also attached the revised original of the ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, with the same above revisions, and after the Council approves the FINDINGS, please serve copies of both documents upon the Applicant and appropriate departments. If you have any questions please advise. msg/Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\Park and Ride\C11cLtrCUPffcls&Order32071900.Mem n CITY OF MERIDIAN RESEARCH REQUEST OCT 112000 City ,~~ v1.~:ridian pity ~l~r~ ~i`~ieP July 28, 2000 VAR 00-010 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING .lUly 5, 2000 APPLICANT Ada County Highway District ITEM NO. 5 REQUEST CUP for 6.36 acres for a proposed Park-and-Ride lot for 100 vehicles in a C-G zone #NAME? AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: i'1 See attached Recommendations ~~ See attached 1" ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~""~ ;~ ~~ OTHER: Contacted: C~~ri~'~r~,~~~C:Ftq,y~~_~Zv Date: ~ r7~,~' Phone: ~~~'7-~( C%C> Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. .~'\ WHITE, PETERSON, PRUSS, MORROW & GIGRAY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW JULIE KLEmr FlscFmz WM. F. GIGRAY, III BRENT J. JOFINSON D. SAMUEL70FINSON WII.LIAM A. Moxxow WILLIAM F. NICHOLS CHRISTOPHER $. NYE I'HII.IF A. I'EIIItSON STEPHIN L. PRUSs ERIC S. ROSSMAN TODD A. ROSSMAN DAVID M. S WARTLEY TNatREHCER WHITE 200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE PosT OFFICE Box 1150 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680-1150 TFa. 208) 288-2499 FAx (~08) 288-2501 June 26, 2000 To: Staff Applicant Affected Property Owner(s) Re: Application Case No. CUP-00-032 Hearing Date: lulu 5, 2000 ~;~ NAMPA OFFICE 104 NINTE AVII~UE SouTx POST OFFICEBOX 247 NAMPA, IDAHO 83653-0247 TEL. (208)466-9272 FAX (208)466-4405 PLEASE REPLY TO MERIDIAN OFFICE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Staff, Applicant and/or Affected Property Owner(s): Please note that these Findin s and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be presented to the ~ity Council at the public hearing on the above referenced matter by the Planning and Zoning Administrator. Due to the volume of matters which the City Council must decide, and to insure your position is understood and clear, it is im ortant to have a consistent format by which matters are presented at the public hearings be~ore the City Council. The City Council strongly recommends: 1. That you take time to carefully review the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, and be prepared to state your position on this application by addressing the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zomng Commission; and That you carefully complete (be sure it is le 'ble) the Position Statement if you disagree with the Findings and~ecommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Position Statement form for this application is available at the City Clerk's office. It is recommended that you pprepare a Position Statement and deliver it to the City Clerk prior to the hearing, if possible. If that is not possible, please present your Position Statement to the City Council at the hearing, along with eight ($) copies. The copies will be presented to the Mayor, Council, Planning and Zoning Administrator, Public Works and the City Attorney. If you are a part of a group, it is strongly recommended that one Position Statement be filled out for the group, which can be signed by the representative for the group. Very truly yours, ity rney's ffi e ~'°'~ BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FORA 100- VEHICLE PARK AND RIDE LOT Case No. CUP-00-032 RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT, Applicant 1. The property is located at the northeast corner of State Highway 69 and Meridian Road, Meridian, Idaho. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is J.L. Boyd Company of Boise. 3. Applicant is Ada County Highway District. 4. The subject property is currently zoned C-G. The zoning district of C-G is defined within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-7-2IC 5. The proposed application requests a conditional use permit fora 100 vehicle park and ride lot. The C-G zoning designation within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance requires a conditional use permit be obtained for most uses including those requested by the Applicant. (Meridian City Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-8-1). RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -PARK AND RIDE LOT FOR 100 VEHICLES ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ~'`~ ~"~ 6. The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission recognizes that the proposed application is in compliance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 7. The use proposed within the subject application will in fact, constitute a conditional use as determined by City Policy. 8. The Planning and Zoning Commission recognizes the concerns of the following, Sidney Harmon, homeowners representative for the Country Terrace Subdivision, Larry Chetwood, President of Meridian Ford, the manager of the JBs restaurant, Marlc Freeman, attorney for Colleen Cope, a homeowner. RECOMMENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the conditional use permit as requested by the applicant, subject to the following, with modifications by the Planning and Zoning Commission italicized: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 1.1 Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Worlcs Department. 1.2 Off-street parking shall be in accordance with the design standards set forth in Section 11-13-4 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. All site drainage shall be contained RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -PARK AND RIDE LOT FOR 100 VEHICLES ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT and disposed of on-site. 1.3 Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Sections 11-13-4.D. and 11-13-4.E.-G. of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 1.4 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 1.5 Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.I~. 1.6 Provide street lights in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5- 2.M. The lights on the property will only shine 180°. 1.7 As part of a conditional use permit, the City of Meridian may impose additional restrictions/conditions. 1.8 No new municipal sewer or water service is being requested by ACHD to serve the site (no restroom). The only public amenities proposed are a pay phone, transit shelters and security bicycle lockers, none of which require City services. 1.9 City Ordinance 11-2-2 defines "Subdivision" as the "result of an act of dividing an original lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more parts. The term "subdivision" shall also include the dedication of a public street..." The dedication of new road right-of-way on this parcel, therefore, will require a preliminary and final plat in order to create the two separate legal parcels noted on the Site Plan. Staff has indicated to the property owner (W.I-~,Moore) that we could support allowing the Park ~ Ride Lot to proceed with the condition that a Preliminary Plat application be submitted prior to any development on the proposed 3.25-acre parcel east of the subject lot. So, under this scenario, the CUP could be approved and the Park ~ Ride Lot constructed with this condition attached for the 3.25-acre parcel. 1.10 The proposed roadway also exceeds the Meridian City Ordinance Section 12-4-2-B., which states that no street which ends in a cul-de-sac RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -PARK AND RIDE LOT FOR 100 VEHICLES ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT i-"~ or a dead-end shall be longer than four hundred fifty feet (450'). A variance from this section would be required for the City to approve public road dedication and a plat. 1.11 Staff does not agree with ACHD that the new, 480-foot access road off Overland be constructed as a rural road with no sidewalk, curb or gutter. Serving a commercially zoned parcel, it should be constructed as a commercial street section. Also, as a Park ~ Ride Lot, pedestrian and bicycle access into the site from Overland Road seems important. We recommend that sidewalk be constructed on at least one side of the new access road until such time as Parcel 2 is developed. 1.12 No trash enclosures or containers are shown on the Site Plan. The Applicant should detail if and/or where they intend to provide trash receptacles, size, exact location, etc. 1.13 Ordinance 12-4-7 requires a minimum of 20-foot wide planting strip be constructed next to incompatible features. Staff considers this use incompatible with the single family residence adjacent to the south (Cope property). Therefore, the landscape strip shown along the south boundary must be increased from 15 feet (as shown) to 20 feet wide. We recommend the Applicant construct either a 3-4 foot high screening wall in front of the 16 parking spaces that head-in to the south property line OR provide a dense landscape screen that will provide an effective buffer within three (3) years from date of lot completion. In order to accommodate the five-foot-wide increased buffer on the south side, Staff could support reducing the 40-foot wide buffer along 1-84 to 35 feet. As 1-84 and SH69 are both designated as entryway corridors, a 35-foot minimum landscape buffer adjacent to the roadways shall be a condition of approval. 1.14 Applicant is to provide a detailed landscape plan for review and approval with submittal for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. Said Certificate of Zoning Compliance is required prior to breaking ground in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-19- l . 1.15 The Site Plan shows four (4) trees within the Ten Mile Drain easement. Staff supports these locations, but a License Agreement with Nampa- Meridian Irrigation District granting approval for the trees within their easement must be submitted prior to the City granting final approval for RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -PARK AND RIDE LOT FOR 100 VEHICLES ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT .~`~y the site. If such an Agreement cannot be obtained, the trees cannot be omitted and must be relocated to another location within the site. 1.16 The Site Plan does not show any trees within the interior lot planting islands. A minimum of I four (4) shade trees should be added to these planters in order to provide improved aesthetics and cooling to the lot interior. 1.17 No van-accessible parking stall (8-foot access aisle) is shown on the Site Plan. Staff recommends at least one of the aisles be widened to 8 feet to provide better van accessibility. 1.18 No signage details were submitted with the application other than standard ADA handicap parking signs. Standard highway district signage is anticipated, but this should be clarified by the Applicant. The City P&Z Department would request ACHD's cooperation to be able to review any signs proposed to identify the site beyond the normal street directional signage. 1.19 The Destination 2015 Plan lists the 1-84/Meridian Road Interchange improvement under the future project list. It calls for a cloverleaf design to facilitate 1-84 westbound traffic onto SH69 southbound. The future design of the interchange could possibly significantly impact the subject parcel. The Applicant should address this issue with ITD and clarify to the City how the future interchange design may impact the Park & Ride Lot. The Planning and Zoning Commission specifically recommended that Comments be included to City Council regarding trafi c and the widening of the roads around Franklin and Meridian Roads, in addition to discussion made on the record. ey/Z:\Work\MuVleridian 15360M\Recommendations\CUP032ACHDLot.wpd RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -PARK AND RIDE LOT FOR 100 VEHICLES ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ~ u ~ z 1 ~ooo ~du ~o~~t~~~~~w ~C~ ~NGC~ Judy Peavey-Derr, President 318 East 37th Street Dave Bivens, Vice President Garden City, Idaho 83714-6499 Marlys Meyer, Secretary Phone (208) 387-6100 Sherry R. Huber Commissioner Fax (208) 387-6391 Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner E-mail: tetlus anachd.ada.id.us June 7, 2000 Ada County Highway District 318 E. 3 7"' Street Boise, ID. 83714 Re: Staff Level Approval MCUP-00-32 Facts and Findings: Overland Road e/o Meridian Rd Park & Ride A. The Ada County Highway District (ACRD) staff has received the above referenced application requesting conditional approval to construct Park & Ride facility for 100 vehicles. The 1.5-acre site is located on the north side of Overland Road approximately 600-feet east of Meridian Road. This development is estimated to generate 220 additional vehicle trips per day based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation manual. B. The application and site plan stamped as received by the City of Meridian on Apri128, 2000, and submitted to the District on May 12, 2000, have been reviewed by the ACRD Planning and Development staff and conforms to applicable District standards/policy, or can be made to conform with the change(s) to the plan described in the requirements stated below. This is a staff level approval and will not be heard by the ACRD Commission unless the site plan is changed in such a manner as to not conform with District standards/policy or an appeal of the Planning and Development staff decision is submitted as described within the Standard Requirements outlined below. On May 15, 2000, the District Planning and Development staff inspected this site and evaluated the transportation system in the vicinity. On May 19, 2000, the staff met as the District's Technical Review Committee and reviewed the impacts of this proposed development on the District's transportation system. The results of that analysis constitute the following Facts and Findings and recommended Site Specific Requirements. D The applicant is proposing to dedicate a 60-foot strip of right-of-way from Overland Road to the subject park and ride facility. The right-of--way strip is proposed to align with Country Ten•ace ~"~ ~'"1 Way to the south. The applicant is proposing to construct the roadway as a 28-foot wide roadway from Overland Road to the subject site. Where the site abuts the right-of--way, the applicant is proposing to construct the roadway as a 40-foot street section with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks within the 60-foot strip right-of--way. E. Driveways on the roadway extended should be constructed as 24 to 30-foot wide curb cuts and located a minimum of 50-feet north of Overland Road. Coordinate the design and location of driveways on the new roadway extended with District staff. The following requirements are provided as conditions for approval: Site Specific Requirements: 1. Dedicate a 60-foot wide strip ofright-of--way from Overland Road to the subject site. Dedicate the right-of--way by means of recordation of the lot split or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of--way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will not be compensated for this additional right-of--way because is a local street and is to be brought to adopted standards by the developers of abutting properties. 2. Construct the new roadway as a 28-foot wide roadway from Overland Road to the subject site and aligned within one lane width of Country Terrace Way on the south side of Overland Road. Where the site abuts the right-of--way, the applicant shall construct the roadway as a 40-foot street section with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks within the 60-foot strip right-of--way. Coordinate the design of the new street with the District's Planning and Development staff. 3. Provide a turnaround at the terminus of the roadway with a minimum turning radius of 45-feet. Coordinate the design of the turnaround with the District's planning and development staff. 4. Comply with requirements of ITD for State Highway I-84 frontage. Submit to the District a letter from ITD regarding said requirements prior to District approval of the lot split or issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Contact District III Traffic Engineer Michael Garz at 334-8340. 5. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 6. Driveways on the roadway extended shall be constructed as 24 to 30-foot wide curb cuts and located a minimum of 50-feet north of Overland Road. Coordinate the design and location of driveways on the new roadway extended with District staff. 7. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, shall be placed on future development of this parcel. Page 2 MCUP00-32 Standard Requirements: This decision of the Planning and Development Supervisor may be appealed to the Ada County Highway District Commission by the applicant or by another party within 15 calendar days from the date of this report. The request shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity The request will be heard by the District Commission at an evening meeting within 20 calendar days of the District's receipt of the appeal letter. The appellant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting. 2. After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within two days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of it's original decision The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. 3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the ITD, Idaho Transportation Department specifications and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 5. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless awaiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. No change in the terns and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. Page 3 MCUP00-32 Conclusion of Law: i"''~ ACRD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the ACHD Planning and Development staff at 387-6170. Sincerely, al annin and Development Supervisor cc: Project file Lead agency Chron Page 4 MCUP00-32 ! ' ~ i I ~ ~ I ' Q ~ I ~ ~' ~ ~ ~~ z t~ w 0 - - .- z a~ a. ca a. e;'e abed •`V"Jd9tr: Z l 00-FZ-qad `t~S@98@B80Z ~. `uetpT,~aVy to ~(}TO :~(g ~uag SOUTH ^~ I-84 L a PAP o~ ~ ~~-~ ~/ ~~~ -~O ~~ P~~ ~~5~ ~~~ ~... ~~ ~% ~~. '~ ,Ny -.rnT71T n AI '~MERI ~. N i~ ~... - _ ' ~ ~4 ~ ,~, ' ~-- rte'-- I'^t .: ~~ ` ~ \~ ,~ ~ ! ~\ t/ 3 ~ ~~ n ~. ~ ~! .~ r `.7 i .- - t I ~ ~/ •,~ - ~ ~I t o ! ' II ~~ •~ . Q I! .. Q 'I ~.. ~-' 1 ~ I,. w ; I .._ ~~~ v,o, ~. .~ i ~~ ~ ~ j '; ~ . ~~ . 97,. ~ ~~ 1 _...nae_a ~ ! ~p• R.C ,~. `, ~ i c-1 ;~I! .~ ,-~ ** TX CONFIF '.ON REPORT ** AS OF JUN 21 318 PAGE.01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD# STATUS 20 06/21 13 09 PUBLIC WORKS OF--S 01'32" 006 239 OK 21 06/21 13 11 LEGAL DEPARTMENT EC--S 02'19" 006 239 OK 22 06/21 13 14 2088886854 EC--S 01'48" 006 239 OK 23 06/21 13 16 FIRE DEPT EC--S 01'46" 006 239 OK ~~ '~.~,1C~T~9~ e u ~ z 9 zoos ~ou~t / / / ~c~a ~C dCwci rn Judy Peavey-Derr, President 318 East 37th Sheet nave R6,nnc ti;.... ~___:~__. - Garden City, Idaho 83714-6499 Marlys Meyer, Secretary Phone (208) 387-6100 Sherry R. Huber Commissioner Fax (208) 387-6391 Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner E-mail: tellus achd.ada id us htne 7, 2000 Ada County Highway District 318 E. 37`" Street Boise, ID. 83714 Re: Staff Level Approval MCUP-00-32 k'acts and Fyndings: Overland Road e/o Meridian Rd Park & Ride A. The Ada County Highway District (ACRD) staff has received the above referenced application requesting conditional approval to construct Park & Ride facility for 100 vehicles. The ].S-acre site is located on the north side of Overland Road approximately 600-feet east of Meridian Road. This development is estimated to generate 220 additional vehicle trips per day based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation manual. B. The application and site plan statnped as received by the City of Meridian on Apri128, 2000, and submitted to the District on May 12, 2000, have been reviewed by the ACHD Planning and Development staff and conforms to applicable District standards/policy, or can be made to conform with the change(s) to the plan described in the requirements stated below. This is a staff ]eve[ approval and will not be heard by the ACRD Commission unless the site plan is changed in such a manner as to not conform with District standards/policy or an appeal of the Planning and Development staff decision is submitted as described within the Standard Requirements outlined below. On May I5, 2000, the District Planning and Development staff inspected this site and evaluated the transportation system in the vicinity. On May 19, 2000, the staff met as the District's Technical Review Committee and reviewed the impacts of this proposed development on the District's transportation system. The results of that analysis constitute tl~e following Facts and Findings and recommended Site Specific Requirements. D The applicant is proposing to dedicate a 60-foot strip of ~ibht-of-way from Overland Road to the subject park and ride facility. The rig}tt-of--way strip is proposed to align with Country Tenace Whitney: Yes, that is correct. ~/ ~~ ~ ~Q, S Borup: Anyone else here to testify on this application. Seeing none, Commissioner's. Barbeiro: I motion that we close the public hearing. Nary: Second. Borup: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Barbeiro: I motion that we recommend approval to City Council request for a conditional use permit for proposed two office warehouse buildings zoned I-L by H&W Incorporated corner of Franklin Road and 10t" Street to incorporate staff comments. Norton: I second that motion. Borup: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES 7. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR 6.36 ACRES FOR A PROPOSED PARK AND RIDE LOT FOR 100 VEHICLES ZONED C-G BY ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT-SOUTHWEST CORNER MERIDIAN ROAD AND NORTHEAST CORNER OVERLAND ROAD: Siddoway: This is a proposed park and ride facility to be constructed by the Ada County Highway District at the on ramp to I-84 at Meridian Road on the east side. It would be accessing that lot off of Overland Road. Looking south a little bit and west toward Meridian Road there is a single family lot that exists on that property to the south. There were several issues as to whether it needs to be platted to dedicate the public road. That is staffs position. I have all ready talked to the applicant who has suggested to me that they will comply with staff comments. Staff comments were submitted by Brad Hawkins Clark. Don't have the date. Oh, June 9, 2000. I will stand for questions and let the applicant speak to any concerns he might have. Borup: Any questions. I noticed we did not have any comments from ACRD. Siddoway: Not commenting on their own project. I do have some draft comments in my folder. That is all I have. Borup: Is there anything in your comments that you did not corporate in you comments. Siddoway: Yes. They are asking that they not be required to do a public street. That they be allowed to do a rural street with no curb gutter and sidewalk. Makes no sense /"\ ~-. to us to be providing a park and ride lot to encourage alternative forms of transportation and not allow pedestrians or bikes to get there but cars. We want to see it developed as a public street, dedicated as a public street and provide curb gutter and sidewalk. Barbeiro: Could you go back to the plan that shows where it sits on Meridian and Overland. Thank you. Borup: The applicant here and like to come forward. We do have two letters that we received in our packet. One from Sidney Harmon and one from Larry Chadwood from Meridian Ford. Those are part of the record. Sharp: My name is John Sharp, 327 N. 27t" Street in Boise and I am the design engineer on this working for ACHD. The location that we have is was selected from about a one year study that we conducted for ACHD and we had 18 sites that we looked at within the Meridian interchange area and selected this one. This has been going on for 2 years so we have met with Meridian Planning and Zoning staff and some of these things I thought we had addressed but the stuff that deals with the entrance road and things I guess ACHD will have to address that. We went through discussions on that earlier and had some things laid out on that and they advised us that it would be a public street and that it be 28 foot roadway through there. That is what it is designed for. At the time future development came in there on the other side that they would be required to do the development for the curb gutter and sidewalk on the other sides of the access street. The road comes in off of Overland Road and goes north and then turns and goes back to the west. Borup: Your saying when someone else comes in they would develop the east and the west side of that section. So what part would you guys be doing? The middle? Sharp: Yeah. We are doing the culdesac and the parking lot area. When we started this we were advised that a lot split would be adequate, now I have no idea how that is going to work out, so if a Subdivision is necessary that can be done too. Borup: So this parcel is being divided off from another larger parcel. Sharp: Yes. It is a little over 6 acres and with the access road right of way and the parking lot area there is about 3 acres coming out of this 6 acres. It is all most a 50/50 split on it with the road and the parking lot combined. The parking lot is a acre or the area we are proposing is about 1.7 acres and the access road right of way into it is about 1.4 acres. There is only a couple issues here that I'd like to get some clarification on. Item 7 about the 20 offset versus the 15, when we originally started that we were under the impression that 15 would be adequate so the 20 foot we would have to go back and do a little bit of shifting. They said we could utilize 5 feet along the east bound on ramp of the interstate by shifting it over. There is a sewer line and a easement thing over there so we would have to be careful how we handled that also. Item 10 we've tried to keep the interior of the parking lot open and some of the surrounding area open as much as possible for security reasons. There is a plan to put a video camera in ~ ',•\ there at a later date so we have tried to keep the parking area open as much as possible in order to maintain that security and been seen both from the interstate and Meridian Road. Item 12 on the signs, the majority of the trailblazers for the park and ride lot are up because they are using several places around the interchange now. We would only be putting a couple extra signs up at the intersection of Overland Road and at the entrance of the parking lot. I apologize if I did not get those in there, but I do have the locations of those shown. Item 13 about the future cloverleaf on the interstate. We discussed this with ITD at the on set of this project. We originally looked at the site they keep their stock pile sand for this park and ride lot and they informed us that it would not be a good idea because some date in the future they wanted to development that quadrant with a cloverleaf. In our discussions at the time they were looking at all this they had no plans to do anything additional in the southeast quadrant of that interchange. To my knowledge that is still the intent. If you have questions I would like to clarify them. Barbeiro: The road would be right here about where the L in Overland is. What is the distance from here to Meridian Road. Sharp: I don't have the right of way plans with me. Borup: Looks like maybe 690 from center to center. Sharp: ACHD has a requirement on a off set intersection to be no more than 12 feet from the 2 center lines and we are right at 11. Barbeiro: This here is the road into Meridian Ford. I have been out here at 8 o'clock in the morning where the traffic is backed up nearly to the Meridian Ford line. I am concerned people trying to make a left turn into here (inaudible) but I have seen many days where the traffic is backed up there. If your going to make a right hand turn your going to have traffic stacking back in here because people aren't going to let you in to make that turn. How have you addressed that possibility. Sharp: There was discussion about widening that out and putting a left turn lane in there. Barbeiro: Are there any provisions here for bike lockers. Sharp: Yes, there is 4 bike lockers on there plus 2 shelters for bus Norton: Would ACHD be receptive to the idea of doing a little horse trading. If the City of Meridian would eliminate you requirement to have trees in the parking lot would you put in a right turn lane on Overland Road to be opened about the same time this park and ride would be opened. Sharp: I couldn't answer that. I don't' know if there is enough right of way for that but we've got a man here from ACHD you can talk to on that. 01 ~••~ Borup: Is this intended to be a permanent parking lot. Sharp: As far as I know it is permanent. Borup: You bought the land. Sharp: There are in the process now of appraising it and working- Borup: That is all thank you. Is someone else from ACHD want to come up now or if we got questions. Roselyn: Joe Roselyn. I am a traffic engineering supervisor for ACHD. Let me address a couple things. The concern about the pedestrian access. We discussed that and what we can do or offering to do right now would be actually shift the center striping of the road if you will and put in a curb and basically provide a separated shoulder to separate the pedestrians from the traffic with a curb on the road and wait for the adjoining properties to develop to get the sidewalks in. We have done that at a few other locations around town. It is less than 300 vehicles a day so you will have a peak surge because it is a park and ride but we feel that is not an uncomfortable amount of traffic for pedestrians to walk with the traffic. Borup: Was there any type of modeling done on this at all. Roselyn: We are actually anticipating most of the usage would be coming from people south of Overland road particularly off of highway. There is no real way to model it. Our assumptions are based on where we see the people request (inaudible). We expect around three quarters to 80% actually from south of Overland and the part people coming from the other side of the freeway. Additional traffic would be higher than 20 percent some of those people who are not now ride sharing would be coming off of Kuna Road and coming onto Overland to get in. Nary: I was just curious, was there any discussion or any thought put into any other alternative entrance or exit from that. It seems like the couple of public comment letters we have are simply just concerned with what we are talking about. Stacking of traffic on Overland right in that location. It is a fairly congestive intersection in morning and afternoon. Was there any thought by ACHD an additional access point to that lot- anotherway to get in and out of it so not everybody has to turn right or left at that street. Roselyn: We are fairly restricted in that lot. You have the freeway on the one side, canal down basically between the lot and Highway 69 and we can't get direct access onto the freeway ramp. We all ready asked ITD. Meridian Ford on the other side has us landlocked over there. If the residential property develops in the future there may be some joint access that could be worked out. That doesn't get you any further away from the intersection. That section of Overland is in our 5 year work program, about 2003 or 2004, to be widened out to 5 lanes and with intersection improvements at Meridian /1 /"~ Road to add some double turn lanes and stuff. We are proposing a left turn lane in and also looking at maybe even because of that Subdivision entrance maybe giving them a right turn lane. Haven't made the measurements to see how much right of way we have there. Nary: Does that roadway line up with the proposed roadway for that Subdivision right there. Roselyn: It is offset by about 11 feet Borup: Commissioner Norton alluded to the intersection at Overland and Meridian and I think ACHD has all ready told us the status of that intersection at previous hearings. Has there been any discussion on doing a temporary right turn lane there. Roselyn: We would love to but unfortunately discussions we have had with the property owners-that little piece of private property there on that corner that all most useless for development, but I think the person is holding on to it to eventually gouge us when we come in to buy the right of way. That is what it is going to take. Buy that lot out. That signal pole is basically at the back of the right of way. Borup: The two lots on the east of the access, is part of Meridian Ford or is that . Roselyn: Yeah that is Meridian Ford property. What they are saying is they don't have any immediate plans. Borup: Your request just to do a paved roadway without any improvement on either side and let that happen as its developed. Is that ACHD recommendation in the past on other applications. Is that normal. Roselyn: I can't say yes or no. It is a case by case on some of these. It has happened before. It is kind of what we do on collectors and arterial actually. We wait for, we have the developer build the essential road and then we come back later with the improvements to get the rest of it. Borup: You were saying in this case you feel you could do a pedestrian bicycle lane with a curb separation it from -essentially you would be paving it while-so a paved sidewalk with a curbing to separate it is what your proposing. Roselyn: Right. Borup: Do we have anyone else like to testify on this application. Freeman: Good evening. My name is Mark Freeman. I live at 3550 Birdie Court in Meridian. I am a attorney and I represent the property owner to the south of the proposed development Corrine Cope who is present with her daughter Linda. Mr. Chairman and Commissioner's the small squared area the area of the property where ~ ~ the residents and the other out buildings are located. The white area that surrounds that is basically pasture land. I will try to be brief. My clients property is zoned R-1. It is a single family residence. I have reviewed the staff comments and my client as proposed my client does not see that this conditional use permit should be granted as proposed, however there may be modifications that can be made through negotiations or otherwise which may make it acceptable to her. I will list the various areas that my client is concerned with. Some of them may not directly involve your commission. She has some concern like I mentioned it is pasture land. Horses are currently pastured on the property. She has irrigation that comes into her property on the southeast corner. I have spoken to the consultant engineer and they are making improvements there. We need to be assured that the way that property be irrigated will allow my client to continue to use the property in a current use. She does not have any intention or plans in the near future to sell it to develop it. So, the comments about developing the property commercially at least as far as my clients property is concerned is just speculation. As far as the comments regarding the access road that would be dedicated, obviously my client believes that a public dedicated road is appropriate. She agrees with the staff comments that it should include curb gutter and sidewalk. I would ask the same question and being a lawyer and wanting a crack at the other side but I would have asked how many times that ACHD has approved that and I know there have been occasions where a similar road has been approved. I think it is unlikely. I think that if I understand the staff comments that the proposal from the staff is to at least to curb gutter and sidewalk on one side of the road. Although it is not a high density road for a number of cars during the day, I would assume that people and pedestrians are going to enter into that lot at the same time the vehicles are going in and out. You may say 300 vehicles but your spreading that out over a relatively close period of time and that is when the pedestrians are there and that is why a sidewalk is needed at that time. There are some other issues that may not be relative today. I need to mention them. One is that either in the plans or as proposed ACHD has talked about or is attempting to obtain an easement from my client for some irrigation purposes just outside the right of way of where the road will be located. She has not be contacted about that and the issue is not resolved. That has not been discussed or obtained. If that is the way ACHD has designed the project they will not be able to proceed unless they obtain that easement or make some other arrangements. We agree with staff comments which state that the proposed use of this property is incompatible with the adjacent single family residence which is owned by my client Corrine Cope. For that reason we believe that the commission and council should consider additional buffering to make it more compatible because clearly it is not compatible. My client has living in that home for I don't know how long-50 years, and it is residence. It is easy in a growing city like Meridian to look at that and say gee I wish I had that property or the person who has it may want to sell it and they might want lots of other things but until that person makes that decision that is a residential property and we need to understand that. We believe that the additional screening and landscaping on the south side of this project as proposed by the staff is appropriate. The extension of the landscape screening from 15 to 20 feet. That is appropriate. This property since it is not fenced at all between the two parcels and horses roam over the entire parcel. Clearly the applicant, if this is approved, will have to fence off my clients property to keep the horses and livestock out of the parking lot and off the road. We believe that an appropriate condition would be the building of a cyclone fence all the way around my clients property. The additional buffering on the south side of the parking lot we feel is also appropriate. We would propose-they would like a berm with maybe a fence on it with some screening and foliage as suggested by staff would work but that may not be consistent of how the city would like to do it in the future. Although it may be difficult my client believes that the impact on their property is even more so by the road into the property as opposed to the parking lot. For that reason although it may be that ACHD and the applicant doesn't have enough width property to it, we believe that it would be appropriate in this use to have the applicant to do some landscape buffering or screening all the way along the road from the parking lot all the way down south to Overland Road. It could be some type of fence or some type of landscape buffer, but again with the understanding this is residential property that road and vehicles turning in early in the morning and lights flashing in the house as they are turning in from Overland Road onto that road is really the same issue my client would have with the access road that you might expect she'd have from the parking lot where lights should be shielded. There is another issue and I don't really know where the city is on the issue as far as their ordinances are concerned but my client has concern about the way that parking lot will be illuminated. We have received from the engineer a copy of that portion of the application which identified why type of light poles will be used. We have concerns that without some types of shielding, with poles of that height there will be a lot of spillage of light onto there property. That will be difficult and suggest the commission should consider some type of screening or shading as a condition. As I mentioned the current usage-my clients property is residential property. The surrounding land is used as pasture. The horses water in the Ten Mile Canal. I am of the opinion and my clients in essence have a prescriptive easement over this corner of the property to water their horses. Sort of a foggy issue which if I am correct and it is a prescriptive easement, will require on of two things to happen. One this will either be fenced off in such a way my clients horses can get into the canal through this property or we will have to make arrangement with the applicant to have some other type of watering arrangement done. There is one place where the canal is low enough to access it is here because the canal bank is too steep. The sewer line as I understand it is located somewhere around here. If we can resolve these other issues, is there a way for us to get either an easement or a stub for that sewer line and the response I got was that might be okay if it is okay with the City of Meridian. I would just wonder if I can get any kind of sense from someone who knows that whether that would be a problem. My clients property would gravity flow to there if it ever is developed or when it is developed. Borup: I thought there were no plans for developing and now your worried about her sewer access. Freeman: My clients are more interested (inaudible) Mr. Chairman, but I am looking out for their best interests in the long run. That is my job. Those are all the comments I have. Borup: Any comments for Mr. Freeman. ,~'~ /'~, Nary: Would you say the bottom line is your would not be adverse of this development if all those conditions were met. Freeman: If the screening and the others can be resolved then 1 believe she would not have difficulty with this proposed use. Norton: Does your client just happen to own that little corner piece of property on Overland and Meridian Road. Freeman: No she does not. Borup: Do you know the distance from her house to this property. It is probably 300 and some feet. Freeman: I don't think it is 300. You might be correct. Barbeiro: Doesn't the house sit about right here. Freeman: My estimation is that it is a little more to the east. Borup: Anyone else. Johnson: Bryce Johnson. 1565 S. Meridian Road. I own and operate JB's Restaurant at the corner of Overland and Meridian Road. In 1991 I built the restaurant. I bought a great site. A good freeway location with good access. In 1994 my partner and I bought the rest of the corner, built the Texaco and added to his motel and I built a small office building. I paid my impact fees. We contributed a sizable amount of property to ACHD to widen Overland Road and improve the END OF SIDE SIX Johnson: driveway that was up the hill. We paid to have the driveway moved down so that it was more accessible and safer. This was in 1994 and we were assured by ACHD that Overland road and the interchange and intersection there was going to be improved in the next couple years. The bottom line of why I am torturing you at a quarter after twelve is we are in the middle of the year 2000 and my business is being impacted. John Jackson's business is being impacted because ACRD has decided that it would be better to build a park and ride then pay for the improvements and improve the infrastructure. Respectfully, and I know this is Planning and Zoning Commission and I understand but I would ask you to please consider if it is a need to have versus a nice to have. A park and ride right now- Borup: Excuse me. Are you saying you rather see the intersection improved then have a park and ride. '`~ /"~ Johnson: Absolutely. Thanks for stopping me. Borup: Let me clarify that. Mr. Oland are these funds -I am assuming that there are separate funding and ones probably got some federal highway money in it and they can't be mixed or co-mingled in any way. Speaker off microphone. Borup: Why don't you come on up. He mentioned that it was 80% federal money on the park and ride and then you had other comments. Oland: We know the problems occurring out there and we do have project in the 5 year work program. We have modified the signal about a year and a half ago to try to improve the intersection. We are moving forward with our other programs. All it takes is a lot of money. Borup: Do you think in 1994, was there a statement made that it would be improved in 2 years. Oland: Well, it was probably said it was on our list of things to do. Borup: It would all ready been in the 5 year plan to have made that statement. Oland: Well, no. It is on our list to do. I did not say it was going to be done in 2 years. Borup: For ACRD to say it was going to be done in 2 years it all ready would have been on the 5 year plan. Oland: Things more because of money-changing priorities. A lot of these projects get shifted. Borup: I think you can see this for the City of Meridian is a very high priority. Maybe number one. Oland: Yeah, well it was number one then now Franklin is number one and next week something else will be number one depending on-we were all ready this last year made a lot of changes to push Franklin Road up without effecting Overland. Every year we justify our work program based on input from the cities and citizens. It is in the 5 year work program. Johnson: We saw the plan. We actually put sidewalks in based on the interchange plan. I was lead to believe it was part of the 5 year plan and was told that it would be one of the priorities. Two more quick comments. As a business owner and a concerned citizen I would ask the Planning and Zoning Commission to be aware it is a big problem and any help you can do -your sitting here approving Subdivision and ,~'~ ,~•\ possibly park and rides that are going to generate more traffic in a situation that is all ready a big problem. Borup: You'd like less traffic by your business. Johnson: To be honest with you right now it is to that point, especially during the commuter times in the afternoon. It is not that the property is a problem. It's the interchange is a problem. The Meridian Overland Road it is an absolute bottleneck. You know that. The other comment. We do need a commuter ride. The scientific survey that I do every day is I have 15 to20 percent of my parking spots taken up by commuter riders. Borup: Anyone else. Boyd: My name is Jim Boyd. I reside at 5016 Lakes Edge Place in Boise. I'd like to made a couple of comments. I am speaking on behalf of the current owner of the property. It is currently in the City of Meridian zoned C-G and with within that zone I would personally think (Inaudible) probably a park and ride would be about as compatible of a use for that residential as I can think of. There are a lot of uses that would have a greater impact for her serenity as a residential use there. Secondly, I believe her house because it is quite close to Overland Road, the noise off Overland and the existing lights and so forth would have as much of a impact as the park and ride. There was one photograph that was shown that showed the distance. Sharp: John Sharp again. Some of the issues that Mr. Freeman addressed -this is going to sound like passing the buck a little bit but Idaho Transportation Department is doing the appraisals and right of way negotiations on this. They are appraising the property and they will probably do the purchasing of the property. It is a Federal Aided project and under that they have to certify the right of way. The irrigation we are trying to fix it as good or better then it is right now. The easement the irrigation the fence the horse water and all those issues that directly effect her property when the negotiation for the right of way is going on is the time she has her chance to handle those because the things that directly effect the property owner a lot of those things we don't get involved with unless it is a design issue like the irrigation. The irrigation of plumbing is on the plans. There will be a diversion box up there at the road where it is just an open ditch now. It will be a concrete diversion box at that time with a slide gate in it to divert water to the south or to the west to her. There is a little problem with the horses water. There is some trading that can be done- automatic water could be supplied through the (Inaudible) negotiations. There is things that can be done. The location to the water is one somebody else's property now and she is using the property so we can try to provide equal of better if possible. Ada County themselves have a requirement for what illumination can go to the property line. When I talked to the Meridian staff they said they did not have any requirements for the intensity of lighting at the property line. These light fixtures that we are using are 30 foot mounting height and square box type that you see mostly used around the area. They are shielded as such that most of the light is directed downwards. The screening -we've tried not to put too much down ~, there for security reasons, but if that is a issue for headlight glare and things like that we can handle that also. All the issues that have been brought up by Mr. Freeman most of that will be handled through the right of way and negations that right now I have just a standard barbed wire fence around the property. If there is another type of fencing that needs to be put across her property boundary then I can put that in the contract as well. Nary: Your talking about incorporating these requests from Mrs. Cope for these concessions. Would you or ACHD have any objection to incorporating those as conditions on this permit. Sharp: Yes and no. I don't have a problem with it but I guess some of those things need to be worked out through like the easement. That is a condition of the right of way. The irrigation and fencing type, those things always worked out through the right of way negotiations. I guess we could say yes but if ITD doesn't negotiate those then I am not sure. Nary: It seems like some what of what they were asking for fencing was fencing along the boundary line. Sharp: That is in there. We are completely enclosing it because it is a rural pasture and both sides or remaining portion of the lot that we are trying to acquire plus Mrs. Cope's property will have to be fenced in order to maintain livestock. Nary: So the lighting and the screening would not be a problem as a condition. Your only talking about the right of way, the water. Sharp: The water and some of the other issues I would prefer those negotiated through the right of way and other big issues that come up as well. Siddoway: I would like to point out a few things based on the applicants testimony and then the concerns raised by attorney Mark Freeman. Most of the concerns are addressed in staff comments. Site specific requirement number 3 does require that a preliminary plat be submitted prior to any development on the parcel that is going to be east of this park and ride lot. That plat will require a variance because this culdesac is long and exceeds the maximum culdesac length as per ordinance so a variance and a preliminary plat will need to be filed. If there is less than 4 lots then they can do the preliminary plat and final plat concurrently. Staffs position on the curb gutter and sidewalk is in staff comment number 5 where we do want to see that. At least one sidewalk on one side but it is zoned commercially, CG, it should be constructed as a commercial street section in our opinion. Number 7 responds to the buffering issue. I don't know how the applicant got the 15 foot number, but 20 foot wide planting strip is the standard. The option for the lighting problems would be either to provide a 3-4 foot wall to contain those headlights or increase the density of the landscaping along this area so it provides an effectively buffer within 3 years from the date of planting. Also in relation to the trees, we do want to see some interior landscaping. We are saying add some trees in these islands at least four and their security cameras can be located in ~ ~ such a way that they can still obtain the site visibility with those trees on the lot. Number 11, they don't show any van accessible handicapped parking stalls. There is a sewer main that runs along this side here. There trees that are proposed may be within the easement. We don't know because the easement is not shown. Those trees will either have to be located outside of that sewer main easement. Barbeiro: Bruce there was a question about access of a sewer. Freckleton: I think it is a good question to raise. We have a main trunk line that runs along Five Mile Creek. There is a crossing somewhere in this vicinity down here and then we have a line that runs across here and up paralleling the interstate. Access to the sewer from Mrs. Cope's property, the trunkline is on the opposite side of the Ten Mile Creek from her place except in the location of this crossing here. So if a service live could be extended to that crossing location, it could be done without having to cross underneath Ten Mile Creek which would be real costly and difficult. Borup: Does that line end at that point. Freckleton: It crosses over and comes on up - On the west side of Ten Mile Creek is the main trunk line. It runs up crosses underneath Overland road and continues out toward Meridian Greens. At that location we have a crossing and then a line that comes up along here and all the way up by Ford. The flow of that sewer comes back toward Ten Mile Creek. I believe that the boundary of the Cope property is Ten Mile drain. The trunkline is on the opposite side of Ten Mile Drain from the Cope property. Barbeiro: I move we close the public hearing. Nary: Second. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Norton: It has come to my attention that little corner property is owned by Flying J and may ACHD just needs to bite the bullet and buy that property and make a temporary right turn lane to help out those neighbors and businesses on Overland Road. I understand the need for park and ride. I feel ACHD needs to be friendly to the City of Meridian and help them out. Maybe in return the City of Meridian will be friendly toward ACRD and do a park and ride. That is my discussion. Barbeiro: As a part of what I would like to put in the recommendations is to include staff comments would be if any lighting is to be placed on the south boundary that it be a 180 degree lighting not 360 so that whatever lighting 30 feet high would only go in (inaudible) to the north. That ACHD build a 6 foot chain link fence along the roadway and along the east and north complete to maintain the pasture. That ACHD negotiate with the landowner to the south regarding the (inaudible) Ten Mile canal and has staff /~ .~-. has indicated continue to include the additional buffering. I believe that between ACHD and the owner because they currently do not have an easement as Mr. Freeman explained, that as a part of their easement negotiations that ACHD would give the land owner the prescriptive easement to the Ten Mile Creek. Siddoway: (Inaudible) by ACHD the map on the wall shows it as part of the lot and I have been told that ACHD has purchased that outright. Barbeiro: Mr. Freeman if you and Steve could discuss what easement it is - Siddoway: We should reopen the public hearing. Nary: Is what your suggesting as part of the easement is that ACHD negotiate or solidify this prescriptive ease that may exist for Mrs. Cope to water her horses. I don't know that we can do that. I don't know that we can extract that from ACHD, that they go to negotiate somebody else's easement as a condition. Borup: I don't know that ACHD necessarily needs that easement for the irrigation. If there is an existing irrigation ditch or a pipe under that access, all they have to do is make sure it continues on. It comes out of the same place and I'm not sure how that ditch goes along there, but it the ditch runs east to west, they just pipe it and it stays the same use. I don't know that they need an easement to do that. Maybe it is more complicated. Siddoway: We have some clarification here. They do have enough right of way all ready for the road. What they need is an easement for tiling the ditch that runs along the western side of that road. There is a current users ditch that in its existing location there. It runs north and south on the Cope property. That is why ACHD needed to get an easement for- Borup: Why? If it is not on their property why do they have to the it. Siddoway: I don't know. Borup: If the ditch is not currently on their property, then why are they worrying about tiling it? Do we need to worry about this? Barbeiro: I think 1 just opened up more than I should of. My intent was making note of Mr. Freeman's- Borup: Sounds like if they are talking about tiling the ditch they are trying to do Mrs. Cope a favor. If it is on both their properties maybe it is a joint helping both owners. If its not the ditch just be left open and they don't have to worry about it. Sounds like maybe we shouldn't be worrying about it. n ~ Freckleton: I guess maybe we should get some clarification on that location. Is the property line of the right of way line down the center line of the ditch or is the ditch solely on- Borup: Why don't we re-open the public hearing. Nary: Mr. Chairman, I move we re-open the public hearing. Norton: I second. Sharp: The irrigation ditch comes across the southern edge of Overland Road to Mrs. Cope's property. At the edge of the right of way that goes into the park and ride, it branches and goes west to her place and then south or north to the park and ride area, that 6.1 acres. Borup: So your concern is tiling that ditch to irrigate the other half of the property. Sharp: We are tiling the ditch in order to not cause future problems but to take the water down to both this property for irrigation for the landscaping and for the additional property that is there. Maintaining it. A permanent easement is standard procedure so that a property owner that is on the other end of the ditch has the right to go in there and maintain it if they need to. Borup: There is no existing permanent easement now? Sharp: They will buy the permanent easement from her. Freckleton: Does the ditch currently serve that property your talking about? Sharp: It serves both properties. Freckleton: At current state there is no easement. It is just a users ditch that has been there for- Sharp: The easement is there for prescription for the irrigation facilities. ITD standard procedure is to purchase a permanent easement and the it so that there is no question as to maintenance in the future. Freckleton: Does the Cope property have access points along that ditch or is provision being made to supply them with whatever historical use they may have had. Sharp: Presently they are taking water out there that continues on to the west and then it goes down across their property or straight down to the property the park and ride is going on to. What we are doing is piping it under the proposed access road and it will go into a diversion structure there where there will be a slide gate to control the water to /', go either north or to the west. My intent was not to disrupt any of the existing conditions. Borup: So the easement that you need because you want to - Sharp: It is a convenience. Nary: I move we close the public hearing. Norton: I second. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Nary: I am looking at Meridian City Code 11-17-3 which is the general standard applicable conditional uses and I think basically to make this as brief as possible, that is the guideline we have to look at on the conditional use permit as to whether to grant it or not and that is really where we need to focus. It appears from the evidence we have before us tonight condition A is that it will in fact be a conditional use permit as staff has made a determination of that as correct. It is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan that the design and construction will not change the character of the general vicinity. What we have determined from the facts is that this is a CG zoned lot so this is a compatible type of use for this type of lot. It appears that most of the evidence that we have heard is on sub D which is will not be hazardous or disturbing to exist in your neighboring uses. I thing Mrs. Cope's counsel has told us that they feel it is compatible as long as all of these conditions are met. I would echo what commissioner Barbeiro said earlier that the lighting be included as additional condition that there be 180 degree lighting on the south side boundary lines so that none of the light spills over onto the Cope's property. That the under conditions under the other ones, there is 9, under the conditional use permit section, the adequate public facilities and services we have had a lot of discussion regarding the sewer lines and access and easement and all that. Also, (inaudible) indicate there is no need for sewer on this property itself. Whether or not it is going to interfere with the easement they are not allowed to interfere with our easement anyway that may be existing for the sewer so even granting this conditional use permit won't change that. There is no additional requirements or public costs for public facilities for the City of Meridian that are detrimental to the economic welfare of the community in granting this conditional use permit. The evidence has been simply that there is better uses at times. Mr. Johnson pretty much stated simply that he'd prefer a different use or that the roadway be changed. That is not really the issue before this commission. G,H and I. His the only one that may have some relevance to what we are talking about. It appears from the staff report that this is going to add a whole lot more to what is all ready what is felt to be congested area to begin with. There is some concession ACHD is making. I would suggest that those comments be included to the City Council about widening and creating a turn lane and some of those things to alleviate the concerns that H would have and the neighbors have raised from the Subdivision that is right across the street. Other then that these 9 conditions appears can be all met by the conditions that have been proposed tonight, therefore I move approval of this request for conditional use permit for this proposed park and ride lot for 100 vehicles zoned CG by Ada County Highway District at the southwest corner of Meridian Road and northeast corner of Overland Road pursuant to the staff comments and the additional conditions that have been made as part of the record in discussion tonight. Barbeiro: For clarification that we would include a fence along the north and east property and of course the lights. Nary: The only thing on the fencing I think there was discussion about different kinds of fencing. I am not sure what is the most appropriate kind of fencing. Do you want to include that fencing has to be done along the boundary line rather than a specific chain link versus something else. Barbeiro: Fencing appropriate to maintain the pasture and livestock. Nary: Fencing appropriate to maintain the property owner for the Cope's should be added. Barbeiro: I will second the motion. Borup: Any discussion? All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: 2 AYES 1 NAY Whitney: Yes, that is correct. Borup: Anyone else here to testify on this application. Seeing none, Commissioner's. Barbeiro: I motion that we close the public hearing. Nary: Second. Borup: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Barbeiro: I motion that we recommend approval to City Council request for a conditional use permit for proposed two office warehouse buildings zoned I-L by H&W Incorporated corner of Franklin Road and 10th Street to incorporate staff comments. Norton: I second that motion. Borup: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES ,~ 7. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR 6.36 ACRES FOR A PROPOSED PARK AND RIDE LOT FOR 100 VEHICLES ZONED C-G BY ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT-SOUTHWEST CORNER MERIDIAN ROAD AND NORTHEAST CORNER OVERLAND ROAD: Siddoway: This is a proposed park and ride facility to be constructed by the Ada County Highway District at the on ramp to I-84 at Meridian Road on the east side. It would be accessing that lot off of Overland Road. Looking south a little bit and west toward Meridian Road there is a single family lot that exists on that property to the south. There were several issues as to whether it needs to be platted to dedicate the public road. That is staffs position. I have all ready talked to the applicant who has suggested to me that they will comply with staff comments. Staff comments were submitted by Brad Hawkins Clark. Don't have the date. Oh, June 9, 2000. I will stand for questions and let the applicant speak to any concerns he might have. Borup: Any questions. I noticed we did not have any comments from ACHD. Siddoway: Not commenting on their own project. I do have some draft comments in my folder. That is all I have. Borup: Is there anything in your comments that you did not corporate in you comments. Siddoway: Yes. They are asking that they not be required to do a public street. That they be allowed to do a rural street with no curb gutter and sidewalk. Makes no sense > A 1 to us to be providing a park and ride lot to encourage alternative forms of transportation and not allow pedestrians or bikes to get there but cars. We want to see it developed as a public street, dedicated as a public street and provide curb gutter and sidewalk. Barbeiro: Could you go back to the plan that shows where it sits on Meridian and Overland. Thank you. Borup: The applicant here and like to come forward. We do have two letters that we received in our packet. One from Sidney Harmon and one from Larry Chadwood from Meridian Ford. Those are part of the record. Sharp: My name is John Sharp, 327 N. 27th Street in Boise and I am the design engineer on this working for ACHD. The location that we have is was selected from about a one year study that we conducted for ACHD and we had 18 sites that we looked at within the Meridian interchange area and selected this one. This has been going on for 2 years so we have met with Meridian Planning and Zoning staff and some of these things I thought we had addressed but the stuff that deals with the entrance road and things I guess ACHD will have to address that. We went through discussions on that earlier and had some things laid out on that and they advised us that it would be a public street and that it be 28 foot roadway through there. That is what it is designed for. At the time future development came in there on the other side that they would be required to do the development for the curb gutter and sidewalk on the other sides of the access street. The road comes in off of Overland Road and goes north and then turns and goes back to the west. Borup: Your saying when someone else comes in they would develop the east and the west side of that section. So what part would you guys be doing? The middle? Sharp: Yeah. We are doing the culdesac and the parking lot area. When we started this we were advised that a lot split would be adequate, now I have no idea how that is going to work out, so if a Subdivision is necessary that can be done too. Borup: So this parcel is being divided off from another larger parcel. Sharp: Yes. It is a little over 6 acres and with the access road right of way and the parking lot area there is about 3 acres coming out of this 6 acres. It is all most a 50/50 split on it with the road and the parking lot combined. The parking lot is a acre or the area we are proposing is about 1.7 acres and the access road right of way into it is about 1.4 acres. There is only a couple issues here that I'd like to get some clarification on. Item 7 about the 20 offset versus the 15, when we originally started that we were under the impression that 15 would be adequate so the 20 foot we would have to go back and do a little bit of shifting. They said we could utilize 5 feet along the east bound on ramp of the interstate by shifting it over. There is a sewer line and a easement thing over there so we would have to be careful how we handled that also. Item 10 we've tried to keep the interior of the parking lot open and some of the surrounding area open as much as possible for security reasons. There is a plan to put a video camera in there at a later date so we have tried to keep the parking area open as much as possible in order to maintain that security and been seen both from the interstate and Meridian Road. Item 12 on the signs, the majority of the trailblazers for the park and ride lot are up because they are using several places around the interchange now. We would only be putting a couple extra signs up at the intersection of Overland Road and at the entrance of the parking lot. I apologize if I did not get those in there, but I do have the locations of those shown. Item 13 about the future cloverleaf on the interstate. We discussed this with ITD at the on set of this project. We originally looked at the site they keep their stock pile sand for this park and ride lot and they informed us that it would not be a good idea because some date in the future they wanted to development that quadrant with a cloverleaf. In our discussions at the time they were looking at all this they had no plans to do anything additional in the southeast quadrant of that interchange. To my knowledge that is still the intent. If you have questions I would like to clarify them. Barbeiro: The road would be right here about where the L in Overland is. What is the distance from here to Meridian Road. Sharp: I don't have the right of way plans with me. Borup: Looks like maybe 690 from center to center Sharp: ACHD has a requirement on a off set intersection to be no more than 12 feet from the 2 center lines and we are right at 11. Barbeiro: This here is the road into Meridian Ford. 1 have been out here at 8 o'clock in the morning where the traffic is backed up nearly to the Meridian Ford line. I am concerned people trying to make a left turn into here (inaudible) but I have seen many days where the traffic is backed up there. If your going to make a right hand turn your going to have traffic stacking back in here because people aren't going to let you in to make that turn. How have you addressed that possibility. Sharp: There was discussion about widening that out and putting a left turn lane in there. Barbeiro: Are there any provisions here for bike lockers. Sharp: Yes, there is 4 bike lockers on there plus 2 shelters for bus Norton: Would ACHD be receptive to the idea of doing a little horse trading. If the City of Meridian would eliminate you requirement to have trees in the parking lot would you put in a right turn lane on Overland Road to be opened about the same time this park and ride would be opened. Sharp: I couldn't answer tha#. I don't' know if there is enough right of way for that but we've got a man here from ACHD you can talk to on that. /~ ,i-~ Borup: Is this intended to be a permanent parking lot. Sharp: As far as I know it is permanent. Borup: You bought the land. Sharp: There are in the process now of appraising it and working- Borup: That is all thank you. Is someone else from ACHD want to come up now or if we got questions. Roselyn: Joe Roselyn. I am a traffic engineering supervisor for ACHD. Let me address a couple things. The concern about the pedestrian access. We discussed that and what we can do or offering to do right now would be actually shift the center striping of the road if you will and put in a curb and basically provide a separated shoulder to separate the pedestrians from the traffic with a curb on the road and wait for the adjoining properties to develop to get the sidewalks in. We have done that at a few other locations around town. It is less than 300 vehicles a day so you will have a peak surge because it is a park and ride but we feet that is not an uncomfortable amount of traffic for pedestrians to walk with the traffic. Borup: Was there any type of modeling done on this at all. Roselyn: We are actually anticipating most of the usage would be coming from people south of Overland road particularly off of highway. There is no real way to model it. Our assumptions are based on where we see the people request (inaudible). We expect around three quarters to 80% actually from south of Overland and the part people coming from the other side of the freeway. Additional traffic would be higher than 20 percent some of those people who are not now ride sharing would be coming off of Kuna Road and coming onto Overland to get in. Nary: I was just curious, was there any discussion or any thought put into any other alternative entrance or exit from that. It seems like the couple of public comment letters we have are simply just concerned with what we are talking about. Stacking of traffic on Overland right in that location. It is a fairly congestive intersection in morning and afternoon. Was there any thought by ACHD an additional access point to that lot- anotherway to get in and out of it so not everybody has to turn right or left at that street. Roselyn: We are fairly restricted in that lot. You have the freeway on the one side, canal down basically between the lot and Highway 69 and we can't get direct access onto the freeway ramp. We all ready asked ITD. Meridian Ford on the other side has us landlocked over there. If the residential property develops in the future there may be some joint access that could be worked out. That doesn't get you any further away from the intersection. That section of Overland is in our 5 year work program, about 2003 or 2004, to be widened out to 5 lanes and with intersection improvements at Meridian Road to add some double turn lanes and stuff. We are proposing a left turn lane in and also looking at maybe even because of that Subdivision entrance maybe giving them a right turn lane. Haven't made the measurements to see how much right of way we have there. Nary: Does that roadway line up with the proposed roadway for that Subdivision right there. Roselyn: It is offset by about 11 feet. Borup: Commissioner Norton alluded to the intersection at Overland and Meridian and I think ACHD has all ready told us the status of that intersection at previous hearings. Has there been any discussion on doing a temporary right turn lane there. Roselyn: We would love to but unfortunately discussions we have had with the property owners-that little piece of private property there on that corner that all most useless for development, but I think the person is holding on to it to eventually gouge us when we come in to buy the right of way. That is what it is going to take. Buy that lot out. That signal pole is basically at the back of the right of way. Borup: The two lots on the east of the access, is part of Meridian Ford or is that . Roselyn: Yeah that is Meridian Ford property. What they are saying is they don't have any immediate plans. Borup: Your request just to do a paved roadway without any improvement on either side and let that happen as its developed. Is that ACRD recommendation in the past on other applications. Is that normal. Roselyn: I can't say yes or no. It is a case by case on some of these. It has happened before. It is kind of what we do on collectors and arterial actually. We wait for, we have the developer build the essential road and then we come back later with the improvements to get the rest of it. Borup: You were saying in this case you feel you could do a pedestrian bicycle lane with a curb separation it from -essentially you would be paving it while-so a paved sidewalk with a curbing to separate it is what your proposing. Roselyn: Right. Borup: Do we have anyone else like to testify on this application. Freeman: Good evening. My name is Mark Freeman. I live at 3550 Birdie Courtin Meridian. I am a attorney and I represent the property owner to the south of the proposed development Corrine Cope who is present with her daughter Linda. Mr. Chairman and Commissioner's the small squared area the area of the property where the residents and the other out buildings are located. The white area that surrounds that is basically pasture land. I will try to be brief. My clients property is zoned R-1. It is a single family residence. I have reviewed the staff comments and my client as proposed my client does not see that this conditional use permit should be granted as proposed, however there may be modifications that can be made through negotiations or otherwise which may make it acceptable to her. I will list the various areas that my client is concerned with. Some of them may not directly involve your commission. She has some concern like I mentioned it is pasture land. Horses are currently pastured on the property. She has irrigation that comes into her property on the southeast corner. I have spoken to the consultant engineer and they are making improvements there. We need to be assured that the way that property be irrigated will allow my client to continue to use the property in a current use. She does not have any intention or plans in the near future to sell it to develop it. So, the comments about developing the property commercially at least as far as my clients property is concerned is just speculation. As far as the comments regarding the access road that would be dedicated, obviously my client believes that a public dedicated road is appropriate. She agrees with the staff comments that it should include curb gutter and sidewalk. I would ask the same question and being a lawyer and wanting a crack at the other side but I would have asked how many times that ACRD has approved that and I know there have been occasions where a similar road has been approved. I think it is unlikely. I think that if I understand the staff comments that the proposal from the staff is to at least to curb gutter and sidewalk on one side of the road. Although it is not a high density road for a number of cars during the day, I would assume that people and pedestrians are going to enter into that lot at the same time the vehicles are going in and out. You may say 300 vehicles but your spreading that out over a relatively close period of time and that is when the pedestrians are there and that is why a sidewalk is needed at that time. There are some other issues that may not be relative today. I need to mention them. One is that either in the plans or as proposed ACHD has talked about or is attempting to obtain an easement from my client for some irrigation purposes just outside the right of way of where the road will be located. She has not be contacted about that and the issue is not resolved. That has not been discussed or obtained. If that is the way ACHD has designed the project they will not be able to proceed unless they obtain that easement or make some other arrangements. We agree with staff comments which state that the proposed use of this property is incompatible with the adjacent single family residence which is owned by my client Corrine Cope. For that reason we believe that the commission and council should consider additional buffering to make it more compatible because clearly it is not compatible. My client has living in that home for I don't know how long-50 years, and it is residence. It is easy in a growing city like Meridian to look at that and say gee I wish I had that property or the person who has it may want to sell it and they might want lots of other things but until that person makes that decision that is a residential property and we need to understand that. We believe that the additional screening and landscaping on the south side of this project as proposed by the staff is appropriate. The extension of the landscape screening from 15 to 20 feet. That is appropriate. This property since it is not fenced at all between the two parcels and horses roam over the entire parcel. Clearly the applicant, if this is approved, will have to fence off my clients property to keep the horses and livestock out ~ ~ of the parking lot and off the road. We believe that an appropriate condition would be the building of a cyclone fence all the way around my clients property. The additional buffering on the south side of the parking lot we feel is also appropriate. We would propose-they would like a berm with maybe a fence on it with some screening and foliage as suggested by staff would work but that may not be consistent of how the city would like to do it in the future. Although it may be difficult my client believes that the impact on their property is even more so by the road into the property as opposed to the parking lot. For that reason although it may be that ACHD and the applicant doesn't have enough width property to it, we believe that it would be appropriate in this use to have the applicant to do some landscape buffering or screening all the way along the road from the parking lot all the way down south to Overland Road. It could be some type of fence or some type of landscape buffer, but again with the understanding this is residential property that road and vehicles turning in early in the morning and lights flashing in the house as they are turning in from Overland Road onto that road is really the same issue my client would have with the access road that you might expect she'd have from the parking lot where lights should be shielded. There is another issue and I don't really know where the city is on the issue as far as their ordinances are concerned but my client has concern about the way that parking lot will be illuminated. We have received from the engineer a copy of that portion of the application which identified why type of light poles will be used. We have concerns that without some types of shielding, with poles of that height there will be a lot of spillage of light onto there property. That will be difficult and suggest the commission should consider some type of screening or shading as a condition. As I mentioned the current usage-my clients property is residential property. The surrounding land is used as pasture. The horses water in the Ten Mile Canal. I am of the opinion and my clients in essence have a prescriptive easement over this corner of the property to water their horses. Sort of a foggy issue which if I am correct and it is a prescriptive easement, will require on of two things to happen. One this will either be fenced off in such a way my clients horses can get into the canal through this property or we will have to make arrangement with the applicant to have some other type of watering arrangement done. There is one place where the canal is low enough to access it is here because the canal bank is too steep. The sewer line as I understand it is located somewhere around here. If we can resolve these other issues, is there a way for us to get either an easement or a stub for that sewer line and the response I got was that might be okay if it is okay with the City of Meridian. I would just wonder if I can get any kind of sense from someone who knows that whether that would be a problem. My clients property would gravity flow to there if it ever is developed or when it is developed. Borup: I thought there were no plans for developing and now your worried about her sewer access. Freeman: My clients are more interested (inaudible) Mr. Chairman, but I am looking out for their best interests in the long run. That is my job. Those are all the comments I have. Borup: Any comments for Mr. Freeman. /"~, ro Nary: Would you say the bottom line is your would not be adverse of this development if all those conditions were met. Freeman: If the screening and the others can be resolved then I believe she would not have difficulty with this proposed use. Norton: Does your client just happen to own that little corner piece of property on Overland and Meridian Road. Freeman: No she does not. Borup: Do you know the distance from her house to this property. It is probably 300 and some feet. Freeman: I don't think it is 300. You might be correct. Barbeiro: Doesn't the house sit about right here. Freeman: My estimation is that it is a little more to the east. Borup: Anyone else. Johnson: Bryce Johnson. 1565 S. Meridian Road. I own and operate JB's Restaurant at the corner of Overland and Meridian Road. In 1991 I built the restaurant. I bought a great site. A good freeway location with good access. In 1994 my partner and I bought the rest of the corner, built the Texaco and added to his motel and I built a small office building. I paid my impact fees. We contributed a sizable amount of property to ACHD to widen Overland Road and improve the END OF SIDE SIX Johnson: driveway that was up the hill. We paid to have the driveway moved down so that it was more accessible and safer. This was in 1994 and we were assured by ACRD that Overland road and the interchange and intersection there was going to be improved in the next couple years. The bottom line of why I am torturing you at a quarter after twelve is we are in the middle of the year 2000 and my business is being impacted. John Jackson's business is being impacted because ACRD has decided that it would be better to build a park and ride then pay for the improvements and improve the infrastructure. Respectfully, and I know this is Planning and Zoning Commission and I understand but I would ask you to please consider if it is a need to have versus a nice to have. A park and ride right now- Borup: Excuse me. Are you saying you rather see the intersection improved then have a park and ride. %'~ T, Johnson: Absolutely. Thanks for stopping me. Borup: Let me clarify that. Mr. Oland are these funds -I am assuming that there are separate funding and ones probably got some federal highway money in it and they can't be mixed or co-mingled in any way. Speaker off microphone. Borup: Why don't you come on up. He mentioned that it was 80% federal money on the park and ride and then you had other comments. Oland: We know the problems occurring out there and we do have project in the 5 year work program. We have modified the signal about a year and a half ago to try to improve the intersection. We are moving forward with our other programs. All it takes is a lot of money. Borup: Do you think in 1994, was there a statement made that it would be improved in 2 years. Oland: Well, it was probably said it was on our list of things to do. Borup: It would all ready been in the 5 year plan to have made that statement. Oland: Well, no. It is on our list to do. I did not say it was going to be done in 2 years. Borup: For ACRD to say it was going to be done in 2 years it all ready would have been on the 5 year plan. Oland: Things more because of money-changing priorities. A lot of these projects get shifted. Borup: I think you can see this for the City of Meridian is a very high priority. Maybe number one. Oland: Yeah, well it was number one then now Franklin is number one and next week something else will be number one depending on--we were all ready this last year made a lot of changes to push Franklin Road up without effecting Overland. Every year we justify our work program based on input from the cities and citizens. It is in the 5 year work program. Johnson: We saw the plan. We actually put sidewalks in based on the interchange plan. I was lead to believe it was part of the 5 year plan and was told that it would be one of the priorities. Two more quick comments. As a business owner and a concerned citizen I would ask the Planning and Zoning Commission to be aware it is a big problem and any help you can do -your sitting here approving Subdivision and r-r there for security reasons, but if that is a issue for headlight glare and things like that we can handle that also. All the issues that have been brought up by Mr. Freeman most of that will be handled through the right of way and negations that right now I have just a standard barbed wire fence around the property. If there is another type of fencing that needs to be put across her property boundary then I can put that in the contract as well. Nary: Your talking about incorporating these requests from Mrs. Cope for these concessions. Would you or ACRD have any objection to incorporating those as conditions on this permit. Sharp: Yes and no. I don't have a problem with it but I guess some of those things need to be worked out through like the easement. That is a condition of the right of way. The irrigation and fencing type, those things always worked out through the right of way negotiations. I guess we could say yes but if ITD doesn't negotiate those then I am not sure. Nary: It seems like some what of what they were asking for fencing was fencing along the boundary line. Sharp: That is in there. We are completely enclosing it because it is a rural pasture and both sides or remaining portion of the lot that we are trying to acquire plus Mrs. Cope's property will have to be fenced in order to maintain livestock. Nary: So the lighting and the screening would not be a problem as a condition. Your only talking about the right of way, the water. Sharp: The water and some of the other issues I would prefer those negotiated through the right of way and other big issues that come up as well. Siddoway: I would like to point out a few things based on the applicants testimony and then the concerns raised by attorney Mark Freeman. Most of the concerns are addressed in staff comments. Site specific requirement number 3 does require that a preliminary plat be submitted prior to any development on the parcel that is going to be east of this park and ride lot. That plat will require a variance because this culdesac is long and exceeds the maximum culdesac length as per ordinance so a variance and a preliminary plat will need to be filed. If there is less than 4 lots then they can do the preliminary plat and final plat concurrently. Staffs position on the curb gutter and sidewalk is in sfiaff comment number 5 where we do want to see that. At least one sidewalk on one side but it is zoned commercially, CG, it should be constructed as a commercial street section in our opinion. Number 7 responds to the buffering issue. I don't know how the applicant got the 15 foot number, but 20 foot wide planting strip is the standard. The option for the lighting problems would be either to provide a 3-4 foot wall to contain those headlights or increase the density of the landscaping along this area so it provides an effectively buffer within 3 years from the date of planting. Also in relation to the trees, we do want to see some interior landscaping. We are saying add some trees in these islands at least four and their security cameras can be located in ~ ~ such a way that they can still obtain the site visibility with those trees on the lot. Number 11, they don't show any van accessible handicapped parking stalls. There is a sewer main that runs along this side here. There trees that are proposed may be within the easement. We don't know because the easement is not shown. Those trees will either have to be located outside of that sewer main easement. Barbeiro: Bruce there was a question about access of a sewer. Freckleton: I think it is a good question to raise. We have a main trunk line that runs along Five Mile Creek. There is a crossing somewhere in this vicinity down here and then we have a line that runs across here and up paralleling the interstate. Access to the sewer from Mrs. Cope's property, the trunkline is on the opposite side of the Ten Mile Creek from her place except in the location of this crossing here. So if a service live could be extended to that crossing location, it could be done without having to cross underneath Ten Mile Creek which would be real costly and difficult. Borup: Does that line end at that point. Freckleton: It crosses over and comes on up - On the west side of Ten Mile Creek is the main trunk line. It runs up crosses underneath Overland road and continues out toward Meridian Greens. At that location we have a crossing and then a line that comes up along here and all the way up by Ford. The flow of that sewer comes back toward Ten Mile Creek. I believe that the boundary of the Cope property is Ten Mile drain. The trunkline is on the opposite side of Ten Mile Drain from the Cope property. Barbeiro: I move we close the public hearing. Nary: Second. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Norton: It has come to my attention that little corner property is owned by Flying J and may ACRD just needs to bite the bullet and buy that property and make a temporary right turn lane to help out those neighbors and businesses on Overland Road. I understand the need for park and ride. I feel ACHD needs to be friendly to the City of Meridian and help them out. Maybe in return the City of Meridian will be friendly toward ACRD and do a park and ride. That is my discussion. Barbeiro: As a part of what I would like to put in the recommendations is to include staff comments would be if any lighting is to be placed on the south boundary that it be a 180 degree lighting not 360 so that whatever lighting 30 feet high would only go in (inaudible) to the north. That ACRD build a 6 foot chain link fence along the roadway and along the east and north complete to maintain the pasture. That ACHD negotiate with the landowner to the south regarding the (inaudible) Ten Mile canal and has staff /"'~ has indicated continue to include the additional buffering. I believe that between ACHD and the owner because they currently do not have an easement as Mr. Freeman explained, that as a part of their easement negotiations that ACHD would give the land owner the prescriptive easement to the Ten Mile Creek. Siddoway: (Inaudible) by ACHD the map on the wall shows it as part of the lot and I have been told that ACHD has purchased that outright. Barbeiro: Mr. Freeman if you and Steve could discuss what easement it is - Siddoway: We should reopen the public hearing. Nary: Is what your suggesting as part of the easement is that ACRD negotiate or solidify this prescriptive ease that may exist for Mrs. Cope to water her horses. I don't know that we can do that. I don't know that we can extract that from ACHD, that they go to negotiate somebody else's easement as a condition. Borup: I don't know that ACHD necessarily needs that easement for the irrigation. If there is an existing irrigation ditch or a pipe under that access, all they have to do is make sure it continues on. It comes out of the same place and I'm not sure how that ditch goes along there, but it the ditch runs east to west, they just pipe it and it stays the same use. I don't know that they need an easement to do that. Maybe it is more complicated. Siddoway: We have some clarification here. They do have enough right of way all ready for the road. What they need is an easement for tiling the ditch that runs along the western side of that road. There is a current users ditch that in its existing location there. It runs north and south on the Cope property. That is why ACRD needed to get an easement for- Borup: Why? If it is not on their property why do they have to the it. Siddoway: I don't know. Borup: If the ditch is not currently on their property, then why are they worrying about tiling it? Do we need to worry about this? Barbeiro: I think I just opened up more than I should of. My intent was making note of Mr. Freeman's- Borup: Sounds like if they are talking about tiling the ditch they are trying to do Mrs. Cope a favor. If it is on both their properties maybe it is a joint helping both owners. If its not the ditch just be left open and they don't have to worry about it. Sounds like maybe we shouldn't be worrying about it. /" ~ Freckleton: I guess maybe we should get some clarification on that location. Is the property line of the right of way line down the center line of the ditch or is the ditch solely on- Borup: Why don't we re-open the public hearing. Nary: Mr. Chairman, I move we re-open the public hearing. Norton: I second. Sharp: The irrigation ditch comes across the southern edge of Overland Road to Mrs. Cope's property. At the edge of the right of way that goes into the park and ride, it branches and goes west to her place and then south or north to the park and ride area, that 6.1 acres. Borup: So your concern is tiling that ditch to irrigate the other half of the property. Sharp: We are tiling the ditch in order to not cause future problems but to take the water down to both this property for irrigation for the landscaping and for the additional property that is there. Maintaining it. A permanent easement is standard procedure so that a property owner that is on the other end of the ditch has the right to go in there and maintain it if they need to. Borup: There is no existing permanent easement now? Sharp: They will buy the permanent easement from her. Freckleton: Does the ditch currently serve that property your talking about? Sharp: It serves both properties. Freckleton: At current state there is no easement. It is just a users ditch that has been there for- Sharp: The easement is there for prescription for the irrigation facilities. ITD standard procedure is to purchase a permanent easement and the it so that there is no question as to maintenance in the future. Freckleton: Does the Cope property have access points along that ditch or is provision being made to supply them with whatever historical use they may have had. Sharp: Presently they are taking water out there that continues on to the west and then it goes down across their property or straight down to the property the park and ride is going on to. What we are doing is piping it under the proposed access road and it will go into a diversion structure there where there will be a slide gate to control the water to i'"~ /"~ go either north or to the west. My intent was not to disrupt any of the existing conditions. Borup: So the easement that you need because you want to - Sharp: It is a convenience. Nary: I move we close the public hearing. Norton: I second. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Nary: I am looking at Meridian City Code 11-17-3 which is the general standard applicable conditional uses and I think basically to make this as brief as possible, that is the guideline we have to look at on the conditional use permit as to whether to grant it or not and that is really where we need to focus. It appears from the evidence we have before us tonight condition A is that it will in fact be a conditional use permit as staff has made a determination of that as correct. It is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan that the design and construction will not change the character of the general vicinity. What we have determined from the facts is that this is a CG zoned lot so this is a compatible type of use for this type of lot. It appears that most of the evidence that we have heard is on sub D which is will not be hazardous or disturbing to exist in your neighboring uses. I thing Mrs. Cope's counsel has told us that they feel it is compatible as long as all of these conditions are met. I would echo what commissioner Barbeiro said earlier that the lighting be included as additional condition that there be 180 degree lighting on the south side boundary lines so that none of the light spills over onto the Cope's property. That the under conditions under the other ones, there is 9, under the conditional use permit section, the adequate public facilities and services we have had a lot of discussion regarding the sewer lines and access and easement and all that. Also, (inaudible) indicate there is no need for sewer on this property itself. Whether or not it is going to interfere with the easement they are not allowed to interfere with our easement anyway that may be existing for the sewer so even granting this conditional use permit won't change that. There is no additional requirements or public costs for public facilities for the City of Meridian that are detrimental to the economic welfare of the community in granting this conditional use permit. The evidence has been simply that there is better uses at times. Mr. Johnson pretty much stated simply that he'd prefer a different use or that the roadway be changed. That is not really the issue before this commission. G,H and I. His the only one that may have some relevance to what we are talking about. It appears. from the staff report that this is going to add a whole lot more to what is all ready what is felt to be congested area to begin with. There is some concession ACHD is making. I would suggest that those comments be included to the City Council about widening and creating a turn lane and some of those things to alleviate the concerns that H would have and the neighbors have raised from the ,^ Subdivision that is right across the street. Other then that these 9 conditions appears can be all met by the conditions that have been proposed tonight, therefore I move approval of this request for conditional use permit for this proposed park and ride lot for 100 vehicles zoned CG by Ada County Highway District at the southwest corner of Meridian Road and northeast corner of Overland Road pursuant to the staff comments and the additional conditions that have been made as part of the record in discussion tonight. Barbeiro: For clarification that we would include a fence along the north and east property and of course the lights. Nary: The only thing on the fencing I think there was discussion about different kinds of fencing. I am not sure what is the most appropriate kind of fencing. Do you want to include that fencing has to be done along the boundary line rather than a specific chain link versus something else. Barbeiro: Fencing appropriate to maintain the pasture and livestock. Nary: Fencing appropriate to maintain the property owner for the Cope's should be added. Barbeiro: I will second the motion. Borup: Any discussion? All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: 2 AYES 1 NAY Borup: Thank you everyone. Commissioner's we are past the time when we said we wasn't going to keep continuing on. We have 3 more items. I don't know. Do we want to have another special meeting this month or would you like to continue on. Barbeiro: With 3 more hours we are going to be here another hour and a half, minimum. Swartley: Before we reset these last 3 items. I don't know what these folks are here for but I don't know if some of them don't have any opposition to what the staff's comments and or are willing to comply with that, there is no opposition from the public, maybe those items we could take up and move along and just if we have to send something over then at least we send something over that is going to be contested. 10. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 4.7 ACRES FROM R-1 TO R-4 FOR PROPOSED ADDITION OF HOME BY OPAL C. FARRINGTON-NORTHWEST CORNER OF EAST PINE AND ADKINS WAY: Siddoway: This is a application for annexation and zoning from Opal C. Farrington. .''~ June 9, 2000 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING: June 13. 2000 APPLICANT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ITEM NUMBER: 7 REQUEST: CUP FOR 6.36 ACRES FOR A PROPOSED PARK AND RIDE LOT FOR 100 VEHICLES AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: SEE ATTACHED LETTER CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING & ZONING DEPT. COMMENTS COMING CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WASTE WATER DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SEE COMMENTS MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: ~~~~~ C~ SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: J~' US WEST: `~ BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: SANITARY SERVICE: . ~~~~. P~~' ~~u OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. MAYOR Robert D. Cowie CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tammy deWeerd Cherie McCandless MEMORANDUM: HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 To: Planning & Zoning Commission, Mayor and City Council From: Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Technician ~~ Brad Hawkins-Clark, Planner ~~C. #E- LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208)887-2211 • Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 June 9, 2000 <-~. ~ U N 0 9 2000 ~'ity of ;1leridiac~ itd ~~` P€~r); f~ffic Re: Request for Conditional Use Permit to Construct a Park & Ride Lot for 118 Vehicles on 3.11 Acres - by Ada County Highway District We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATION SUMMARY This application requests approval to construct a new Park & Ride Lot, to be owned and maintained by the Ada County Highway District, at the NE corner of the intersection of SH69/Meridian Road and Overland Road. The lot would comprise 3.11 acres of an existing 6.36 acre parcel and contain 118 parking spaces. While aone-time lot split is technically permitted on the parcel in that the parcel appears to be in the same configuration as in 1984, the right-of--way dedication for the new public road accessing the site will force the parcel to be platted in order to bring the two parcels into conformance with City codes. The parcel is currently zoned C-G (Commercial General), which requires a CUP for all public and quasi-public uses. The Ada County Highway District May 29, 2000 report requires 60 feet ofright-of--way dedication for the road off Overland but does not require curb, gutter and sidewalk along the 480-foot strip. As noted below, P&Z Staff are recommending this be constructed as any standard commercial street section and that all road improvements be made. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North - I-84 eastbound on-ramp. Central Valley Corporate Park on the north side of I-84. South - A 3.8-acre parcel, owned by Corinne E. Cope, zoned Rl in Ada County, with asingle-family residence and other agricultural outbuildings and amenities. Ten Mile Drain and a 50-foot wide easement course the extreme SW corner of the parcel. A 0.7-acre vacant parcel, zoned C-G and owned by Flying J, touches the SW corner on the south side of Ten Mile Drain. East -Meridian Ford sales lot. West - SH69. CUP-00-032 ACRD Park-n-Ride.CUP.doc ~ ~ P&Z Commission/Mayor & Council June 9, 2000 Page 2 GENERAL CONDITIONAL USE REQUIREMENTS 1. Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the site plans. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. 2. Off-street parking shall be in accordance with the design standards set forth in Section 11-13- 4 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 3. Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Sections 11-13-4.D. and 11-13-4.E.-G. of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 4. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 5. Provide five-foot-wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.K. 6. Provide street lights in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2.M. SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS 1. As part of a conditional use permit, the City of Meridian may impose additional restrictions/conditions. 2. No new municipal sewer or water service is being requested by ACHD to serve the site (no restroom). The only public amenities proposed are a pay phone, transit shelters and security bicycle lockers, none of which require City services. 3. City Ordinance 11-2-2 defines "Subdivision" as the "result of an act of dividing an original lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more parts. The term "subdivision" shall also include the dedication of a public street..." The dedication of new road right-of--way on this parcel, therefore, will require a preliminary and final plat in order to create the two separate legal parcels noted on the Site Plan. Staffhas indicated to the property owner (W.H. Moore) that we could support allowing the Park & Ride Lot to proceed with the condition that a Preliminary Plat application be submitted prior to any development on the proposed 3.25-acre parcel east of the subject lot. So, under this scenario, the CUP could be approved and the Park & Ride Lot constructed with this condition attached for the 3.25-acre parcel. CUP 00-032 ACRD Park-n-Ride.CUP.dce P&Z Commission/Mayor & Council June 9, 2000 Page 3 4. The proposed roadway also exceeds the Meridian City Ordinance Section 12-4-2-E., which states that no street which ends in a cul-de-sac or a dead-end shall be longer than four hundred fifty feet (450'). A variance from this section would be required for the City to approve public road dedication and a plat. 5. Staff does not agree with ACRD that the new, 480-foot access road off Overland be constructed as a rural road with no sidewalk, curb or gutter. Serving a commercially zoned parcel, it should be constructed as a commercial street section. Also, as a Park & Ride Lot, pedestrian and bicycle access into the site from Overland Road seems important. We recommend that sidewalk be constructed on at least one side of the new access road until such time as Parcel 2 is developed. 6. No trash enclosures or containers are shown on the Site Plan. The Applicant should detail if and/or where they intend to provide trash receptacles, size, exact location, etc. 7. Ordinance 12-4-7 requires a minimum of 20-foot wide planting strip be constructed next to incompatible features. Staff considers this use incompatible with the single family residence adjacent to the south (Cope property). Therefore, the landscape strip shown along the south boundary must be increased from 15 feet (as shown) to 20 feet wide. We recommend the Applicant construct either a 3-4 foot high screening wall in front of the 16 parking spaces that head-in to the south property line OR provide a dense landscape screen that will provide an effective buffer within three (3) years from date of lot completion. In order to accommodate the five-foot-wide increased buffer on the south side, Staffcould support reducing the 40-foot wide buffer along I-84 to 35 feet. As I-84 and SH69 are both designated as entryway corridors, a 35-foot minimum landscape buffer adjacent to the roadways shall be a condition of approval. 8. Applicant is to provide a detailed landscape plan for review and approval with submittal for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. Said Certificate of Zoning Compliance is required prior to breaking ground in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-19-1. 9. The Site Plan shows four (4) trees within the Ten Mile Drain easement. Staff supports these locations, but a License Agreement with Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District granting approval for the trees within their easement must be submitted prior to the City granting final approval for the site. If such an Agreement cannot be obtained, the trees cannot be omitted and must be relocated to another location within the site. 10. The Site Plan does not show any trees within the interior lot planting islands. A minimum of four (4) shade trees should be added to these planters in order to provide improved aesthetics and cooling to the lot interior. CUP 00-032 ACRD Park-n-Ride.CUP.doc n P&Z Commission/Mayor & Council June 9, 2000 Page 4 11. No van-accessible parking stall (8-foot access aisle) is shown on the Site Plan. Staff recommends at least one of the aisles be widened to 8 feet to provide better van accessibility. 12. No signage details were submitted with the application other than standard ADA handicap parking signs. Standard highway district signage is anticipated, but this should be clarified by the Applicant. The City P&Z Department would request ACHD's cooperation to be able to review any signs proposed to identify the site beyond the normal street directional signage. 13. The Destination 2015 Plan lists the I-84/Meridian Road Interchange improvement under the future project list. It calls for a cloverleaf design to facilitate I-84 westbound traffic onto SH69 southbound. The future design of the interchange could possibly significantly impact the subject parcel. The Applicant should address this issue with ITD and clarify to the City how the future interchange design may impact the Park & Ride Lot. CUP 00-032 ACRD Park-n-Ride.CUP.doc Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Dear Commissioners: June 9, 2000 ~~~~IVE~ ¢.l JUN 0 9 2000 Cit~• of tileridian City Clerk Office A survey of the homeowners in Country Terrace Subdivision indicated that they are overwhelmingly opposed to the conditional use permit requested by ACRD for a park and ride lot for 100 vehicles located on E.36 acres at the corner of Meridian Road and Overland Road with access only from Overland Road for the Following reasons: Overland Road is an archaic two lane road that can hardly handle the present traffic and is total gridlock during the morning and evening rush hours, at which time the lot will be used, making both entry and exit from the lot virtually impossibile. The city council has given its approval for a large complex at the corner of Overland and Locust Grove Roads t~: hich when completed prior to year 2004, the year impravements are scheduled on Overland Road, is going to make Overland a total gridlock around the clock. A new high school is planned in the immediate future adding several hundred more vehicles morning, noon, and afternoon which `will add more gridlock. Western Equipment is building a truck repair facility adding more heavy equipment to a road that cannot handle the present traffic. A large storage facility is planned on Overland Road adding even more vehicles. The overpass for Locust Grove and I-84 isn't even on the schedule to help alleviate the Overland Road traffic problems. Overland Road is also going to be home to a transport trailer plant which will draw even more truck traffic. ACRD knows Overland Road desperately needs a right turn lane for traffic coming from the east at the corner of Overland and Meridian Roads aiid refuses to install oiie to ease and move the present traffic going into Meridian. This would allow the traffic to move out of the way aiid make it possible to enter or exit the parking lot at the time it will be used. Homeowners in our subdivision now have trouble entering Overland and with everything planned it will become even more of a problem. Another 100 vehicles will only compound the problem. Another location not having the traffic problems on Overland is the place a park and ride lot should be located. ~?~''~ ~~ Sidney Marmon Home Owners Representative ,-. ,ate ~CE~`'~D JUN 12 2000 MERIDIAN FORD P~~ MEZO ~N ~G June 10, 2000 Meridian Planning and Zoning Meridian City Hall 200 E. Carlton Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 iileri da a ~/ Dear Planning and Zoning, While I fully support the necessity and concept of a "Park and Ride" located in Meridian, I urge you to review the hazards of placing one at the Meridian and Overland crossroads at this time. Showroom: 250 E. Overland Rd. Meridian, Id. 83642 Mailing: P.O. Box 207 Meridian, Id. 83680 Telephone: 208-888-4403 Fax: 208-888-4215 www.meridianford.com The current traffic congestion on our section of Overland would only worsen during the rush hour time frames with Park and Ride in place. Currently, vehicles back up to Bonefish while they are waiting for the Meridian Road stop light at 5:00 p.m. Turning left from Bonefish now can be hazardous as cars are also attempting to enter or exit Overland from Meridian Greens. During the morning rush hour, I can envision Overland east bound park and ride participants unable to make the required left turn into their location because of west bound Overland traffic and vehicles backing up all the way to the Meridian Road/Overland intersection. The result would be to prevent the drivers south bound in Meridian Road from making a left onto Overland Road which is currently stacking up well past JB's Restaurant. Until the intersection of Meridian Road and Overland is widened and improved, with an additional left turn lane, adding more vehicles at rush hour does not seem wise. Additionally, we oppose future development south of Overland, near Locust Grove before those roads are widened and turn lanes added. If I can be of any help to the Planning Committee, please let me know. Thank you. Sincerely, Larry Chetwood President ~~ 05/23/2000 06:32 M,~YOR Robmrt D: Cowie CITY COUNCIL 41EMBERS Ron Anderson Keith 8i~•d Tammy deweerd Cherie McCandless 2088885052 SANITARY SERVICE ~ ~ HUB OF TREASURE GALLEY A Good Place to Livc CITE OF MERInIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 8362 (208) BSS-~33 • Fax (205) 887•~tS 13 City Clerk Office Fax (205) 338.215 PAGE 07 LEG.~L DEP~\RT,~1E~~T (2178) 2S3•_4V9 • F,~ 'S~.~Srii I'Uf3L1C \VORKS 13U1LDING DEPARTMENT (208)t;87.2?11 • F,x 587-IZ~7 PLANNING AND ZnNIN(; D EPA RTv1 ENT (208) SSa-553; • Fix fi5fi-GS51 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES 1FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Wifl Berg, City Clerk by: June 2 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: Mav 9, 2000 HEARING DATE: June 13y 2000 FILE NUMBER: CUP-00-032 REQUEST: Park 8 Ride Lot for 100 Vehicles-6.36 Acres ,Zoned CG ~~~TION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Northeast corner Overland Road Southwestcorner Meridian Road - SALLY NORTON KENT BROWN P2 MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT , THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT -RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z KEITH 60RUP P/t' COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION - , -ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT _RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT , KEITH BIRD C/C IDAHO POWER C0.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) - , TAMMY de WEERD, C/C W U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) , ATER pEPARTMENT EWER DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM ~ FINAL) SANITARY SERVICE -BUILDING DEPARTMEIyT -FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: POLICE DEPARTMENT -.--,CITY ATTORNEY ` -„CITY ENGINEER ,,CITY PLANNER REc~rv~D MAY 2 3 2000 CITY 0~ il~E~ID~'V MAY 23 '00 06=40 2088885052 PAGE. 07 CENTRAL •• DISTRICT ~1'rHEALTH DEPARTMENT Rezone # CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT Environmental Health Division Preliminarq /Final /Short Plat We have No Objections to this Proposal. ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. Return to: ^ Boise ^ Eagle Garden City Meridian Kuna ^ Acz A~ ~ ~ ~~~~ C~ ~~ ~~~ ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4• We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ waste flow characteristics ^ or bedrock from original grade ^ other ^ 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. ^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. ^ 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ^ central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage ^ central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water ^ 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: ^ central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines ^ central water ^ 10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ I I. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store 14. ~,~r~ ~ii~' .4~~3~ S~~s~-.,.ifa-~~~ Date: / /_ ~ C r~ v~.~ ~ y~o~s Reviewed By: [DHD 10/91 rc6, ~.,ro, Review Sheet CENTRAL ~• DISTRICT ~1"HEAL DEPA T TH R M ENT MAIN OFFICE • 707 N. ARMSTRONG Pl. • 9CISE. i0 83704-0825 • (208) 375-3? i I • F,-;;( 327~8~OG Tu prevent and !teat disease and disability; to prunrute lrealtlry lifestyles; acrd to prated mrd prunurte the kealtlr and quality of unr ern~irnmrrent. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that storm water be pre-treated through a grassy Swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to ground water and surface water quality. The engineers and architects involved with the design of this project should obtain current best management practices for storm water disposal and design a storm water management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals that could be used for guidance are: State of Idaho Catalog of Stormwater Best Management Practices For Idaho Cities and Counties. Prepared by the Idaho Division of Environmental Quality, July 1997. Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook. Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department, January 1997. Serving valley, Elntnre, Boise, and Ada Counties Ada /Boise County Office 707 N. Armsrong PI. Boise. ID 83704 Enviro. Hecith: 327-7499 Family Planning: 327-7400 immunizations: 32 7 -7450 Senior Nutrition: 327-7460 ~r/IC: 327-7488 FAX 327-8500 Ada-WIC Satellite Office 1606 Robert St. Boise. ID 83705 Ph. 334-3355 FAX: 33d-3355 Elmore County Office 520 E, 8th Street N. Mountain Home..D 83647 Enviro. Health: 587-9225 Family. Health: 587-4407 WIC: 587-4409 FAX: 587-3521 Valley County Office 7CJ N. l st Street P O Box 1448 McCall, !D 83638 Ph. 634-7194 FAX: 534-2174 .~~ „~„ ~' Cl Iw. ~~: `' t ,. . i AYOR ~ HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY Rob U. Conie A Gpod Place t0. Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT CO NC1L MEMB vITY r OF MERIDIAN (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 ERS PUBLIC WORK R Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO S BUILDING DEPARTMENT eith Bird ~ MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208> 887-2211 • Fax887-1297 mmy deWeerd ~~; ;::~ < (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 ~ PLANNING AND ZONING 'herie McCandless ~ ; City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT i;.: „ ~, I ;. ; (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 ~ ; u~'ar~ ~.. °. , i TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN a` ~ ~~~` '` To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian ~~ Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations ~~ ~k ~' to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: June 2. 2000 ~~, .,> e~ ~ '~~ .TRANSMITTAL DATE:- Mav 9, 2000 HEARING DATE: June 13. 2000 i~, ~~. ~.~~.: ~~r' ~-~~; :..FILE NUMBER: CUP-00-032 ,< 6'N ,a~;. REQUEST: Park & Ride Lot for 100 Vehicles-6.36 Acres Zoned CG ~~.. `~~ '~` BY: Ada County-Highway District f, fi~i , } L LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Southwest corner Meridian Road ~. ~~ ~ _ ' ~'' :Northeast corner Overland Road ~~a k t 1"~%t ; ~` L+K -SALLY NORTON MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT KENT BROWN, P2 MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) THOMAS BARBEIRO P2 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT -,RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION -KEITH BORUP, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH '' .,ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT _RON ANDERSON, C/C ~ SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C IDAHO POWER C0.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT ~. _ ) M , ,n K EITH BIRD . , C/ _ C ~_ ' U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL,PLAT) r ~+ ~ TAMMYde WEERD, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ' ~ ~',WATER DEPARTMENT r,_ ,' BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PRELIM -SEWER DEPARTMENT ~' ~-`<.. ( & FINAL) E ~ SANITARY SERVICE '' ~' ~` '~ -BUILDING DEPARTMENT, t , ~'' -FIRE DEPARTMENT ~ YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: NO ~~iwr•~S" a 4 ~ -,,,POLICE DEPARTMENT + xx..,; , ' ri ,' ~ =.CITYATTORNEY ~ - ~' ,..-,CITY ENGINEER ~_ ,,,-CITY PLANNER ~,. :. `,. r ; i ~ ~ i ~ 7 ..- ~ ry ~ , r r w ~ s..: ~ ~ o,-x,. r k, i .... ~~ I r ~~ ~: ~ ~ - '.. - ~' P~ -~ e~ .r . ~~. . «,~.., ~ I ~ ks-~ x RECE/VE ,t. .. D r i xu ...w+. ~ ~r .f...,3 ..aa.u.; ~. ~ _,~~.+, _..~ .... ... ~ ..MAY t ~ MAY 1 1 2000 200 0 a, `,., a , ; ; ~~, Meridian City .{, .t f i ~ ~~ I~I~IDIA,'~' WaterSuperiAtendext MAYOR ~ HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY ~` Robert D. Cowie A GOOd Place t0 Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY OF MERIDIAN (zo8> 288.2499 • Fax 28.25°' Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO PUBLIC woRKs BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) s87-22I I • Fax 887-1297 Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZOMNG Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: June 2, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 9, 2000 HEARING DATE: June 13. 2000 FILE NUMBER: CUP-00-032 REQUEST: Park & Ride Lot for 100 Vehicles-6.36 Acres Zoned CG BY: Ada County Highway District LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Southwest corner Meridian Road Northeast corner Overland Road - SALLY NORTON KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR _RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C TAMMY de WEERD, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT _SANITARY SERVICE ~UILDING DEPARTMENT _FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER _CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER C0.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL) YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ` / ~ `~~._-" ~ LC~ ~3~tT ~' ~raC ~ Ind ~w~ CEI~~ ~~ ~~AY 1 ~ 200 y° ~ ~ ~ERIUtH~'J MAYOR ~`' HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY '~ Robert D. Cowie A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT CITY COUNCI CITY OF MERIDIAN B 201 (`08) L MEMBERS PUBL C bVORKS Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT Keith Bird MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 8s7-2z t I • Fax 88~- 1297 Tammy deWeerd (203) 383-4433 • Fax (208) 337-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (203) 833-4218 DEPARTMENT (208) 884-533 • Fax 888-6854 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations wilt be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: June 2, 2000 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 9, 2000 HEARING DATE:_ June 13, 2000 FILE NUMBER: CUP-00-032 REQUEST: Park ~ Ride Lot for 100 Vehicles-6.36 Acres Zoned CG BY: Ada Countv Highway District LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Southwest corner Meridian Road, Northeast corner Overland Road - SALLY NORTON KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO, P/Z RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z KEITH BORUP, P/Z _ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR _RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C _KEITH BIRD, C/C TAMMY de WEERD, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT _SEWER DEPARTMENT SANITARY SERVICE BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY _CITY ENGINEER _CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL) ~~ ~~dd bbL0b8880Z MAYOR Rabat D. Cowie CITY COUNCIL MEMEERS Ron Anderson Keith Burl Tammy dcWoE~ Cherie McCandless .•.. ~ bb : ~ Z 00 ~ ~ ~ .lbW HU6 OF 7"REASURE bAGGEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF ME12 ~ DI N A .LEGAL DEPARTMENT (2t,~) zs$-~~». F,,~ ass-~5~~ . . . , 33 EAST IAAHO MERIDIAN ID a1 H0 83642 PUBLIC WORKS 1 DING DE1FA Ras EN9 t20S' , . . (203) 888.443; • Fax (?43) 331-a3i3 ' r ~ ) 7 City Clerk Ofi'ice fax '~ (_03) 833-4213 YLANN[NCi AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (20S) 854-55:y.; • Fax g88-G85a TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR CQMMENTS ON DEvE~,OpMENT PROJECTS WITH THE C1<TX OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridi Plann[ng ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendatioan to Merldlan City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: June 2 2000 ns TRANSMITTAL DATE: Ma 9 2000 HEARING DATE: June 13 2000 FILE NUMBER: CuP_nn_n~~ REQUEST: BY:_ Ada LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Southwest corner Meridian Road Northeast corner Overland Road - SALLY NORTON KENT BROWN, P/Z THOMAS BARBEIRO. P/Z ----RICHARD HATCHER, P/Z -.KEITH BORUP, P/Z -ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR _RON ANDERSON, C/C CHERIE McCANDLESS, C/C -KEITH BIRD, C/C TAMMY de WEERD, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT rSANITARY SERVICE -BUILDING DEPARTMENT -FIRE DEPARTMENT 1 POLICE DEPARTMENT -CITY ATTORNEY -CITY ENGINEER -CITY PLANNER w~~ MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH ~NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER C0.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(pRELIM & FINAL) RE°E~D MAY 1 1 20Qp CITY OF ME.R,IDL~1Y b0/i0d bbLAb888AZ YOUR CONCISE REMARKS• N 'L E a D ~ N ~ O ~ '~ ¢ N C ~ LL fN ~fQ ~ ~ N a ~~0m wEo cv~~LL ~„_o Eo L ~ O ~ O ~ lL ~. ~Q E ° ~ ~, fq ~ ~ = ~ lL X U O .a w y Q flS O.L.. D li N ~m ¢ ~ ~ ¢ ~i ~ ~' ~ d V1 .1] N O C 0 ~ C Z N O = ~ ^^ o d d 7 ~ - ~ C ~ L ~ N ~ ? ~ ~ > ~ d U '~ ~ _ Q O v ~" ¢ O Q _ ~~ . ~ N ~ ~ N N O C Of ¢ ~ U C ~ ~ E w O O C t p~ U ~ =U d aCi -_ ~ U ~O ~O^ ~ro ~ E LL ~ o ~ ~ w` ,V ~~ a~ a ~ ~ `' o Y l! J~ y O ~ VM' ~ ~ U V~ v °0 3 a Q N d ~i~i~i~~ °' ~ v E ~ ~ W - O az ~Nd M `° ° ~ d ~ N d v Ear a~ Zap ~ r N ('r1 I~ $ m `~ ~ V) ~ ~ I O I T I r I T I T mod; N a'O d) ~ N a O L C C Q 0 ~'N~m .~ - ~ a v N'm 'N m ~ 5v~~°Sm Emv,o~c ~N~a~~ E~am_ X'- X C A O EoW~E>, m~ o 0 0 c _ ~ O = Q O ~. ~a 3~ n E ~ m d~ m N Q H 'O N m -Ea °'~'c mym inEEEct N U N~ C U a C ~ O ~ (p - W N o10~a°'imm .~~E dr E N K p O m d y f0 '~ U c~,EOOa c W r$ c N t0 F- N ~ . o v ~ ~ E caiv,._ y~o~-E Ey~a~ `0 C 'O d U >. w O -EU`0~m N 7 O O'N E C p ~`~ d ~ ~ aE.o c d ~ O y ~ c c:°$~rim d°o~pErnm '~c`ax_Eo> J C O X O U 0) i o.E E¢`o m d O C . L ? C ~ CO ~ N ~ C O p, N ._ N ~$N~~m C m ~ $ fn's E .ro y mom"~ ~ a 'D `N j U G ~ 'O _C N N C H l0 l0 loo ® •~ L~ d N 0 ~0 N a m O Y c :: o p, E ~ a~ ~ a d N y a o p E U 2 `m a _~ m a° N _U d ~ a~ a_ oo~ E `0 ~a z > -~ ~ 'm U ~Q y d a o~ m= ~~ E ~ ~~ z .o d '- F- J m ~ Q ti ~i d