Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
July 2000
RECEIVED JAN 10 2002 City of Meridian City Clerk Offiec- - Comprehensive - Parks & Recreation System Plan Parks & Recreation Department City of Meridian Idaho Section 1 Existing Conditions Section 2 Needs Assessment Section 3 Park Facilities Development & Operations Objectives Section 4 Costs & Funding Section 5 Policies � Standards Appendices ll I if Comprehensive Parks & Recreation System Plan Parks & Recreation Department City of Meridian Idaho By LANDERMAN-MOORE ASSOCIATES ROBERT W. DROLL, LNNDSCAPE ARCHITECT, PS July 2000 Table of Contents Transmittal i Authorization _ ll Acknowledgments _ Introduction/ Summary iv -ix Section 1 Existing Conditions 1 1.1 Recreation Resources 1 _ 1.2 Recreation Programs & Services 4 1.3 Population & Demographics 6 1.4 Current Level of Service 10 Section 2 Needs Assessment 13 _ 2.1 User Groups & Community Workshops 13 2.2 Key Person Interviews 17 2.3 Needs Assessment 26 Section 3 Park Facilities Development & Operations Objectives 29 3.1 Parkland Acquisition 29 3.2 New Parks Development Objectives 30 3.3 Recreation Facilities 32 3.4 Park & Recreation Department Mission Statement 35 3.5 Park & Recreation Department Organization 36 3.6 Recreation Programs 38 . _ 3.7 Senior Programs & Services 41 3.8 Park Operations/ Maintenance 42 Section 4 Costs & Funding 53 4.1 Acquisition & Development Costs 53 4.2 Administration, Operations & Maintenance Costs 58 '— 4.3 Maintenance Management 62 4.4 Funding Programs 66 4.5 Potential Funding Sources 70 Section 5 Policies & Standards 73 5.1 Park & Recreation Policies 74 5.2 Park & Recreation Standards 79 Appendix A. List of Workshop Participants B. User Groups Questionnaire C. Workshop Agendas & Notes D. Parkland Acquisition Criteria E. Key Person Interviews: Groups, Participants & Summary Responses to Questions List of Illustrations Introduction/ Summary following page Meridian Vicinity/ Location Map ix Section 1 Existing Conditions 1-1 Meridian Parks Inventory 12 Section 2 Needs Assessment 2-1 Meridian Recreation Service Areas 28 Section 3 Park Facilities Development & Operations Objectives 3-1 Comprehensive Parks & Recreation System Plan 34 Section 5 Policies & Standards 5-1 Neighborhood Park Classification Model 85 5-2 Community Park Classification Model 85 5-3 Special Use Park Classification Model 85 5-4 Suggested Outdoor Facility Development Standards 85 List of Tables — Section 1 Existing Conditions — 3-1 1-1 Existing Operational Parks 2 r 1-2 Undeveloped Park Land 2 1-3 Western Ada County Park District, Existing Operational Parks 3 1-4 Existing Trail Systems 3 1-5 Population, Housing & Household 6 _ 1-6 Population by Age 7 1-7 Population by Race 8 1-8 Public Schools Enrollment by Grade 9 "- 1-9 Current Level of Service 10 Section 2 Needs Assessment 2-1 Parkland Needs, 1999 - 2005 - 2010 27 2-2 Land Acquisition & Park Needs, 2000, 2005 & 2010+ 28 Section 3 Park Facilities Development & Operations Objectives — 3-1 Parks Development Program - Year 2000 31 3-2 Parks Development Program - Year 2005 31 3-3 Parks Development Program - Year 2010+ 32 '- 3-4 Facility - Space Standards for Neighborhood Parks 33 3-5 Facility - Space Standards for Community Parks 34 3-6 Park Maintenance Job Descriptions 45 Section 4 Costs & Funding .... 4-1 Comparative Land Values 54 4-2 Land Acquisition Cost Projections 55 4-3 Capital Development Costs Projections by Park Classification 55 _ 4-4 Parks Development Costs Projections 56 4-5 Park & Recreation System, Land Acquisition & 57 Development Cost Projections 4-6 Annual Per -capita Costs 58 — 4-7 Administration, Operations & Maintenance Cost Projections 60 4-8 Selected Communities Administration and 61 0 & M Costs Per -capita Ratio Transmittal July 14, 2000 Mr. Tom Kuntz, Director MERIDIAN PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 11 West Bower Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Mr. Kuntz, We are pleased to transmit the final Comprehensive Parks & Recreation System Plan. This document includes revisions pursuant to the draft review transmitted by your office on January 25, 2000. The recommendations set forth are the result of public input, key person interviews, research, analysis, and planning activity. It is apparent that parks and recreation is important to Meridian's citizens. The Comprehensive Plan establishes a guide to the development of a parks and recreation system over the next ten years. We appreciate the opportunity to have been of service and wish the Department and City of Meridian well in its endeavors. "- Res ectfully Submitted, Norman J. Landerman-Moore, President LANDERMAN-MOORI AssocIATFIS I Authorization On July 6, 1999, the City of Meridian commissioned preparation of a Comprehensive Parks & Recreation System Plan. The City Council authorized the Director of Parks & Recreation to proceed with an agreement securing the services of LANDERMAN- MOORE ASSOCIATES of Anacortes, Washington. -' On July 23"', initial meetings were held in Meridian, Idaho to review the scope of work, establish logistical procedures, review existing parks and collect data and information relevant to the assignment. Research and analysis activities began in September of 1999 and continued to completion of the work by way of transmittal of the final plan to the City Council. City of Meridian Robert D. Corrie, MAYOR Ron Anderson, c0uNC1LNn:N1B1?R Keith Bird, couNCIJ.N[P.MBFIR Tammy de Weerd, COUNcu_NIFNIBUR Cheri McCandless, couNCHAI :MBFIR — ll Acknowledgments We wish to express gratitude to the many individuals and recreation organizations who participated in the key person interviews, public workshops and meetings, conducted during the planning process. We offer a special recognition to the Parks & Recreation Department, Director and staff, the Parks & Recreation Commission and City staff for their diligence and cooperation in advancing the plan to its completion. We also recognize and thank the Mayor and City Council for their leadership and support in this important undertaking. City Council Robert D. Corrie, MAYOR Ron Anderson, COUNCILh ENBER Keith Bird, COUNCILMEMBER Tammy de Weerd, COUNCn,NIFNIBER Cheri McCandless, COUNCILM MBER Parks & Recreation Parks & Recreation _ Commission Department David Moe, CI IAIR-MAN Tom Kuntz, DIRECTOR Jim Keller, VICE PRI-SIDENT Catrina Thomas, RIC. SUPERINTENDENT Sheri Baker Tami Smith, ADM. ASSISTANT Joe da Rosa Elroy Huff, PARK SUPERINTENDENT Ed Fong Dennis Summers, PARK SUPERVISOR — Rick Heller Kristin Lundgren Spence Shivers Brad Day 111 Introduction/ Summary It is recognized that the residents of the City of Meridian view the availability of parks and recreation activities important to individual and family health, fitness and quality of life. However, interests in, and the importance of, recreation activities vary and are individual choices expressed in terms of preference as to the facilities within parks to be developed and recreation programs to be offered. The City of Meridian, through its Park & Recreation Department, seeks to provide recreation opportunities, and facilitate the needs of the population to participate in recreation through locating and developing a well designed and maintained parks system. Also, to improve recreation services, and encourage the efficient use of community resources through partnerships with schools, leagues and private entities. In order to further enhance parks and recreation service capabilities, the City has been engaged in organizing a Comprehensive Parks & Recreation System Plan. The plan is a guideline for the advancement of parks and recreation services for the next 10 years and beyond, and addresses the following objectives: • Conduct an evaluation and inventory of existing public parks and recreation programs. • Assess and forecast public needs for future parks and recreation services. • Project the cost of improving, maintaining and operating existing and future recreation facilities. iv • Recommend development and service standards for existing and future parks and facilities. • Graphic and narrative description of park classifications and recreation service areas. • Identify costs and funding programs for park improvements and program services. • Suggest a set of policies and standards to guide the development -- and administration of a Parks & Recreation System. — As the needs for acquiring parkland, developing facilities and providing services are pursued, the supporting policies and implementation procedures will need to be adopted, allowing effective implementation and administration of the Meridian Parks & Recreation System. The Department has taken the initiative for the orderly development of parks and recreation services through the Comprehensive Plan process which is organized as an administrative and policy tool that will guide decisions involving the development and operations of public recreation in the City of Meridian over the coming ten (10) years and beyond. • Between 1990 and 1999 Meridian's population grew from 9,596 _ to 37, 735. By 2005, the population within the City boundaries is projected to be about 48, 000; and by 2010, within an expanded City boundary, the population may reach 92,500. • The City currently operates 35.8 acres of parkland and about 900 lineal feet of trail. Meridian also owns a 56 -acre park site and a 6.7 -acre park, which may be developed in the near future. Within the City boundaries, Western Ada County Park District operates a 25 -acre park and a 2.1 -acre "Pocket park ". Thus, at present, there are approximately 62.9 acres of public parks available to a population approaching 40, 000. u • The 56 -acre park site is master planned to become a Community Park and the 6.7 -acre Chateau Park is master planned to become a neighborhood park. When these two park sites are developed, they will add 62.7 acres to the park inventory operated and maintained by the City of Meridian. • The City's current level of service, based on acres of parkland _ per every 1, 000 residents, is 0.95 ac/1, 000. Considering public access to Western Ada County Parks District parks, the current overall level of service is about 1.7 ac/1,000. If the City develops the 56 -acre community park and 6.7 -acre Chateau Park, the level of service provided by the City of Meridian will increase to 2.6 ac/1, 000 and the overall level of service would be 3.3 acres for every 1, 000 residents. • The park and recreation needs assessment reveals a requirement for the City of Meridian to establish a level of service (LOS) standard of 6.0 acres per 1, 000 residents. • Based on the 6.0 ac/1, 000 LOS, the City of Meridian will need to acquire additional parkland and/or establish land use agreements with the School District at the following magnitudes. Year 2000 100.0 Acres Year 2005 62.8 Acres Year 2010+ 265.8 Acres • For the same time period (2000 to 2010+), there is a need to develop ten (10) new neighborhood parks, six (6) new community parks and establish a trails and pathways system that utilizes approximately 91.6 acres or nearly 63 miles of trails and pathways within parks and public rights-of-way. • The location of new parks, trails and pathways is planned to occur within two (2) Recreation Service Areas. Area I is north of the I-84 Freeway and Area 2 is south of the Freeway. V1 • In order to establish and maintain a level of service of 6.0 ac/1, 000 over the next 10 to 15 years, the City of Meridian would need to develop the existing undeveloped park sites, acquire land and develop new parks in both Recreation Service Areas as follows: Year 2000 3 Community Parks 3 Neighborhood Parks 7.0 Miles of Trails & Pathways Year 2005 1 Community Park — 3 Neighborhood Parks 10.4 Miles of Trails & Pathways Year 2010+ 3 Community Parks 5 Neighborhood Parks 45.3 Miles of Trails & Pathways • The Department of Parks & Recreation should work with sports leagues and recreation organizations to assist in facilitating recreation scheduling and use of public parks and recreation facilities. The Department Should assist community and non- profit groups to organize and produce recreation classes and activities, and promote the use of parks on a year around basis. • The Department's mission is generally to provide opportunities and encourage participation in recreation activities through ` developed and well maintained parks, recreation programs and support services. • The Department will need to establish a maintenance management system and develop its organizational structure —' along functional lines with staffing that ensure quality administration, recreation services and maintenance. Vii -' • Development costs projected for the 56 -acre Community Park and Chateau Park total $11.5 million. • Land acquisition costs for the 428.6 additional acreage required by 2010 and beyond is projected to range between $8.6 million to $12.9 million in 1999 dollar values. • Parks, trails and pathways total development costs projected at year 2010 and beyond ranges between $40.2 million to $68.7 million in 1999 dollar values. • The current annual per -capita cost to operate and maintain City of Meridian, Parks & Recreation is about $13.50. The projected O & Mper-capita costs by 2005 and 2010 are as follows: Year 2005 $47.08 -' Year 2010+ $55.56 This results in an annual operations and maintenance budget projection of about $2.3 million for 2005 and $5.2 million by 2010 and beyond. • A set of policies has been recommended for adoption. Such policies focus on organization, development and administration -' of a City or municipal parks and recreation department and its stewardship for public assets. The policy categories are: Parkland Acquisition Park & Facility Improvement Recreation Programs & Services Park Operations & Maintenance Economic Pefformance & Finance Support Activities vil • Standards for various park classifications including community and neighborhood parks, special use parks, and trails and pathways are provided for adoption. -- • Funding programs identified to consider for the development of a parks and recreation system include public debt financing programs, statutory programs, provided by state law or local ordinances and other funding procedures which include concession contracts, interlocal agreements and user fees. Meridian Vicinity/ Location Map Section 1 Existing Conditions This section discusses current recreation resources, their use and the level of service provided by the City of Meridian for public recreation. The following also identifies current improvement activities for new parks and recreation facilities. 1.1 Recreation Resources The City of Meridian currently has five (5) operational City parks, which total 35.8 acres of land. Western Ada County Park District owns and operates one (1) 25 -acre park and a small "pocket park" that is 2.1 acres in size. The City also owns 62.7 acres of undeveloped parkland, which includes a 6.7 -acre site named Chateau Park and a 56 -acre Community Park site, which are currently being master planned. When the two new parks are developed and operational, the City of Meridian will own a total of 98.5 acres of operational parks. The following is a listing and general description of the existing public recreation resources within the City of Meridian. 1 Total Existing Operational Parks 35.8 Ac. SOURCE: City of Meridian, Parks & Recreation Department Landerman-Moore Associates Table 1-2 City of Meridian Undeveloped Park Land NAME ACRES "Community Park" 56.0 Chateau Park 6,7 Total Undeveloped Park Land 62.7 Acres SOURCE. Citv of Meridian, Parks & Recreation Department Landerman-Moore Associates 2 Table 1-1 City of Meridian Existing Operational Parks 1999 NAME FACILITIES ACRES Storey Park Softball, Baseball, Playground, 15.0 Ac. Picnic Shelters, Restroom, Horse Shoe Pit, Open Play & Parking 8th Street Park Turf Play Area, Playground 2.5 Ac. Tully Park Softball, Soccer, Basketball, 18.0 Ac. Picnic Shelters, Playgrounds, Restrooms, Open Play Areas & Parking Generation Plaza Monument Feature 0.1 Ac. City Hall Park Monument Feature 0.2 Ac. Total Existing Operational Parks 35.8 Ac. SOURCE: City of Meridian, Parks & Recreation Department Landerman-Moore Associates Table 1-2 City of Meridian Undeveloped Park Land NAME ACRES "Community Park" 56.0 Chateau Park 6,7 Total Undeveloped Park Land 62.7 Acres SOURCE. Citv of Meridian, Parks & Recreation Department Landerman-Moore Associates 2 Table 1-3 Western Ada County Park District Existing Operational Park 1999 NAME .ACR1;S Fuller Park 25.0 "Tanury Street Pocket Park" 2.1 Total District Parks 27.1 Acres NOTE: Fuller Park includes softball, playgrounds, picnic shelters, restrooms, open play areas and on-site parking SOURCE. City of Meridian, Parks & Recreation Department Landerman-Moore Associates City Trails The trail systems that exist provide limited opportunities. The following table indicates trail systems that are developed and operational. Table 1-4 Existing Trail Systems 1999 IR -NIL SYSTEM USP/ CLASSIFICATION \TION Fodiergil Pathway N/A 900 L.F. Total 900 L.F. NOTE: _-1 pathway located within Fuller Park owned and operated by Western _lida Special District is available for public use. Odier undeveloped land for trails include the "5- 'Alile Creek" pathway. SOURCE. City of Meridian, Parks & Recreation Department Landerman-Moore Associates 3 A" 1.2 Recreation Programs & Services The City of Meridian, Park & Recreation Department is the primary recreation service provider for the jurisdictional area. Recreation activities and services provided by the City are organized by seasons of the year, i.e., winter, spring, summer and are fall and administered by Department Staff. No participation rate data is available at this time. Recreation activities offered by the City of Meridian are described as follows: • Kids Dance Pre -Ballet for Tots Beginning Ballet Jazz Clogging Beginning Tap Dance Ballet, Jazz & Tap Combo Pre -Ballet • Tennis & Day Camps Junior Tennis Tennis Lessons (Free) Summer Kids Klass Life on the Farm Day Camp • Kid's Arts & Crafts Drawing & Painting Sculptures & Such Cartooning Groovy 70's Art from Around the World Functional Art Kids Stamping • Music, Sports & Such Kids Kenpo Karate Beginning Guitar Lessons Beginning Fiddle Lessons Kid's Bowling Bumper Bowling Kids Golf Basics • Free Fun Fine Station Fun Police Department Visit Estate Planning • Ice Skating Parent & Me Snow Plow Sam I Basic I Adult & Teen • Adult Activities Tennis Beginning Fly Casting Archery Lamb Kabob Cooking Adult First Aid & CPR Infant & Child First Aid & CPR Climbing Adult Karate Square Dancing Kickboxing Aerobics Women's Self Defense • Dog Training & Dancing Dog Training Level 1 Dog Training Level 2 Line Dancing Adult Swing Dance Beginning Ballroom Dance .. 4 • Crafts & Fitness Stamped Revolving Cards Framed in Stitches Five Cards for $5 Handsaw Blade Painting Adult Kenpo Karate Cardio Karate Kickboxing Stretch & Tone • Summer Stitching Silk Ribbon Needlework Cross Stitch Basics Specialty Stitches Mystery Christmas Ornament Hardanger Stitching Kids Cross Stitch • Families & Seniors Roaring Springs Fun Day 50's+ Adult Tap Dance Father's Day Stepping Stone Bingo Senior Center Activities Women's/Children's Health Services • Youth Activities Soccer Wrestling In-line Hockey Ice Hockey Football Baseball & Softball Babe Ruth Baseball Kids Bowling Kids Beginning Archery .� Motor Development Skills Introduction to Cheerleading Kids Karate Gymnastics • Arts for Youth Kids Drawing Kids Clay Teen Drawing Teen Sculpture • Arts & Crafts Silk Ribbon Needlework Beginning Cross Stitch Beginning Hardanger Stitch Crochet Felted Hat Herbal Skin Care Beginning Spinning Reading Knitting Patterns Button Making The following is representative of other recreation service providers that are in Meridian or in other communities within the region. Fine Arts Organizations Swim Clubs -- YMCA & YWCA Explorers Cultural & Historical Associations Tennis Clubs League Sports Clubs Brownies & Cub Scouts .... Private/ Commercial Recreation Biking & Hiking Clubs Boys & Girls Clubs Police & Sheriff Departments 4H & FFA Organizations Nature Study Groups Health Clubs Dance Clubs Girl Scouts & Boy Scouts Social Clubs Each of these recreation service providers contributes to the Supply of activities that make up the recreational and leisure resources available to the citizens of Meridian. 5 -' 1.3 Population & Demographics The City of Meridian was incorporated as a village in 1903 with a population of 200. By the early 1990's, the City had grown to a population of nearly 10,000. The City population continued to -' grow and, as of the summer of 1999, the City of Meridian had a population of 37,735. The City Comprehensive Plan indicates that the population within the City boundaries could increase to 48,200 within the next five years. Within approximately 10 years, or by 2010, the population may reach 92,500. Long-term projections indicate that as the City continues to expand its boundaries and experience a high rate of population growth, there may be 150,000 residents at full build -out. A projected date for build -out of the City of Meridian has not been made. The following table indicates population, housing and household size for the years of 1990 to 2010. Table 1- 5 City of Meridian Population, Housing & Household 1990-2010 1'EykR POPULATION HOUSING HOUSI-f-IOII) SIZE 1990 9,596 2,649 2.65 1999 37,735 7,639 2.70 2005 48,200 11,560 2.70 2010 92,500 33,636 2.75 SOURCE. Ada County Planning Claritas, Inc. ro Table 1-6 City of Meridian Population by Age - 1999 SGP, MERIDIAN Under 5 Years 3,321 8.8 5 to 9 Years 3,585 9.5 10 to 14 Years 3,170 8.4 15 to 19 Years 2,756 7.3 20 to 24 Years 2,189 5.8 25 to 29 Years 2,301 6.1 .. 30 to 34 Years 2,453 6.5 35 to 39 Years 3,547 9.4 .., 40 to 44 Years 3,472 9.2 45 to 54 Years 4,604 12.2 55 to 64 Years 2,981 7.9 65 to 74 Years 1,660 4.4 75 to 84 Years 1,207 3.2 85 Years & Over 489 1.3 Total 37,735 .-. Median Age in Years 35.5 SOURCE. Ada County Planning Claritas, Inc. Landerman-Moore Associates %I The ethnic diversity of the City of Meridian is identified in the following table. The data used reflects a current total population of 37,735. The ethnic distribution by percent of total population has been assumed to remain relatively constant. However, changes in the ethnicity of the community may change in coming years. Table 1- 7 Population by Race - 1999 RACE MERIDLAN % White 36,075 95.6 Hispanic 1,132 3.0 Asian 340 0.9 Black 113 0.3 All Other 75 0.2 Total 37,735 SOURCE: Ada County Planning Claritas, Inc. Landerman-Moore Associates The community of Meridian is served by Joint School District No. 2 of Ada County. Within the City of Meridian, there are -- seven (7) Elementary Schools, two (2) Middle Schools and two (2) High Schools. The total enrollment, as of June 1999, was 8,254. By the beginning of year 2000, it is estimated that total enrollment in Meridian schools will be about 9,500 and indications in family size suggest continued growth in youth populations. ^ E:3 Table 1-8 City of Meridian Public Schools Enrollment by Grade June 1999 GRADE TOTAL. Pre -School 36 Kindergarten 756 .. First 822 Second 778 .- Third 758 Fourth 740 Fifth 722 Sixth 492 Seventh 497 Eighth 525 Ninth 656 Tenth 535 Eleventh 486 Twelfth 451 Total 8,254 SOURCE: Joint School District No. 2 .. City of Meridian It is recommended that the Parks & Recreation Department •• request school enrollment data annually in order to monitor youth population growth and consider user demand and recreation programming for events and youth activities. .� 9 1.4 Current Level of Service Level of service standards for parks and recreation is generally described by the National Recreation & Parks Association (NRPA) on the basis of acres of parkland per every 1,000 residents within a specified service area. Using the acres per 1,000 ratio applied to the 35.8 acres of City parks and 27.1 acres of District Parks, located within the City of Meridian, the current level of service is 1.67 acres per 1,000 residents. Current national standards for urbanizing communities are between 5.0 acres to 8.0 acres per 1000 population *. Sections 2 & 3 will indicate a recommended Level of Service (LOS) standard of 6.0 acres per 1,000 residents for the City of Meridian. If the standard is adopted, there would be a need to increase the current Level of Service by 4.33 acres per 1,000 to meet the requirements of the existing population. Table 1- 9 Current Level of Service Acres/ 1,000 Ratio (assumes population of 37,735) JURISDICTION PARK ACREAGE \C/1 000 RATIO City of Meridian 35.8 Ac. 0.95 Ac./1,000 Western Ada County Park District 27.1 Ac. 0.72 Ac./1,000 62.9 Ac. 1.67 Ac/1,000 SOURCE. City of Meridian Landerman-Moore Associates * National Recreation & Parks Association "Parks, Recreation, Open Space & Greenway Guidelines", December 1996 10 Current planning activity includes master plans for the potential development of a 56 -acre community park and improvements to _ Chateau Park, a 6.7 acre site, classified as a neighborhood park. When these two parks are developed and operational, the City of Meridian will have 98.5 acres of parks available for public use. Considering the additional parks and recreation resources provided by Western Ada County Park District (27.1 acres), there would be the potential of 125.6 acres of parks and recreational facilities available within the next year or two. If these improvements are realized, the City of Meridian will have raised its level of service (LOS) to approximately 3.3 acres per 1,000 resident population. 11 12 Illustration 1-1 Meridian Parks Inventory 4000 0 4000 Feet �7 � Legend City Limits r7 County Owned Land Landerman-Moore Associates Rohe t W. Droll, Landscape Architect Pa - t t Section 2 Needs Assessment The Comprehensive Plan addresses recreation interests through an assessment of recreation demand. —' Decisions regarding parks and recreation demand involve a determination of what level of facilities and level of services are to be provided and the _ classification and geographic distribution of parks within the community. In order to facilitate information leading to an understanding of recreation demand, three (3) community and user group workshops were held. In addition, a series of key person interviews were conducted _ generating important views from individuals and recreation user groups regarding their interests and needs. The information and data gathered has been used to identify recreation activity interests and park facilities needed by the population. The following text and tables further describe in -put through public participation and analysis used in determining _ demand and the needs for parks and recreation in the community of Meridian. 2.1 User Groups & Community Workshops The three (3) workshops were organized to generate information regarding recreation programs and park facility needs. The workshops were group focus sessions addressing recreation programs and facilities. 13 The following describes the format and issues addressed in the workshop activities. A summary of the results of the workshops may be found in the Appendix. Group I - RECREATION ACTIVITIES This group was asked to focus on recreation programs and user interests. Their focus sessions included the following discussion —' topics. A. Discuss the types of recreation activities or programs that occur as provided by the City, schools, churches, private companies or others in the Meridian area. B. List the types and discuss the relative importance of recreation activities to your community. C. Discuss and list other recreation issues, deficiencies and level of service provided in the community. D. Conduct a round table discussion that focuses on new recreation activities which are needed or desirable. E. Make a list of "NEW RECREATION PROGRAMS & SERVICES" needed. F. Discuss recreation activities with a view toward their level of importance or priority and rank them by low priority and ascending order to activities of high priority using a scale of 0-5. — 14 -` Group II - PARK LAND & FACILITIES NEEDS Workshop participants who joined Group II were asked to focus on the following items of discussion: A. Discuss your views regarding the location, size, type of facilities and use of existing parks in Meridian. Carefully review their location, size, and type of park facilities. B. List any deficiencies that may be apparent. List comments so that they may be understood by all participants. Try to maintain a consensus on any park land and facility issues your group identifies. C. Review the lists and make any changes or additions that _ may be appropriate. D. Discuss ideas that group members may have for new parks and improved facilities at existing parks. Make a general list of the suggestions made. E. Discuss ideas for new parks, their general location, size and facility needs related to activities discussed by Group I. 15 The following is a synopsis of the views expressed during the workshops as taken from the group leader notes. League Sports: The community has a strong interest in league sports activities for youth, young adults and adult members of the population. The greatest demand and interest level is for soccer and baseball fields. Other organized sports needs include youth and adult softball, basketball, volleyball and youth football. –' Individual Sports: While league sports maintain a high level of interest, there is an equally strong interest in individual sports or sporting activities that are not organized on the basis of leagues. — These include skateboarding, in-line skating, tennis, golf, handball, wrestling, fencing, and swim competition. Trails & Pathways: The broadest community based interest in trails or pathways appears to be with walkers and joggers followed by bicyclists. — Specialized Sports: There are a number of sports interests which are evolving from individual activity into league, competition or event activities. These include skate -boarding, remote control model airplanes, or in-line skating/hockey, long distance runs and competition events. Family Fitness/ Leisure Activity: The traditional and cultural interest in health, — fitness, outdoor leisure activities and passive recreation remains a high value in terms of the needs of all age groups of the population. _ Cultural & Special Events: Interest and participation in the cultural and special events is much greater than anticipated and is an under- served category of recreation in the community. Activities — include dance, music, art, theater, cultural interpretation and festivals or major seasonal and cultural events. Adult Activities: Those representing adult activities have suggested a continuing and expanded need to serve the recreation needs of active adults. This segment of the population is growing in terms of its percentage of the total population and recreation service requirements are perceived to expand accordingly. Special Populations: The view of many attending the workshops is that there are a number of special populations that require recreation programs. 16 6" 2.2 Key Person Interviews A series of questions were scripted by LMA and the City of Meridian to ask of key people representing several aspects of the community. The people interviewed were also selected by the g City. wm The questions were administered at City hall over a two (2) day period. A total of 35 people were invited to be interviewed, however, 25 people actually participated in the interview process. The interview sessions were structured into gioups and organized in terms of "category of interest", such as sports leagues, schools, PTA, day care, general recreation activities and so -forth. The following synopsis provides summary statements for each of _• the questions asked. Statements of individuals, then groups, have been merged and are based on a reading of each response given by individuals within each of the groups interviewed. The summary statements may provide information as to an interest in, and/or a bias toward, a particular function of parks and public recreation. However, this procedure, while providing indicators, does not represent a statistical validation typically found in the science of a properly administered citizens' survey. Thus, conclusions and " decisions rendered on the basis of interviews and the summary statements should be balanced with the workshop information and level of service standards suggested for the community of Meridian. Please refer to Appendix E for a review of Group Summaries. Individual interview responses are on file with the Department of Parks & Recreation. The following are Questions asked, along with Summary Response to Key Person Interviews. 17 1. What, in your view, are the types of recreation programs of greatest benefit to the people of Meridian? Why? The predominant view is that youth and adult sports programs would be of greatest benefit to the people of meridian. In addition, the view is expressed that both indoor and outdoor recreation programs are of benefit and consideration should be given to facilities and programs that will accommodate family activities, fine arts, music, seniors and programs for children. 2. What is your perspective on the growth and the need for parks? The unquestionable response is that population growth has surged far ahead of parks and recreation resources. The dominant view is to acquire land for new parks, however, several expressed the need to give priority to improving existing parks and developing parkland that the City currently owns. 3. What is your perspective on the need for recreation programs? The general perspective is that there is a great need for recreation programs that serve the needs of people of all ages and for all seasons. The dominant suggestions are listed as follows: Youth Sports Community Theater Swim/Aquatics Adult Recreation Plays & Musicals Child Development Recreation Classes Indoor Recreation Activities Dance Instruction After-school Programs for Kids Additional commentary included the importance of private service provider participation, evening programs for adults, educational programs, pet training activities, affordable programs that are held in a recreation center and the importance of well advertised programs and use of volunteer support groups to facilitate recreation services along with City staff. 4. What are your feelings regarding the adequacy of existing parks, their locations, conditions, size and suitability? All responses indicate that a severe deficiency of parks and recreation services exists in the City of Meridian. Some comments suggested that new subdivisions approved by the City require land for new parks. The south and west areas _ of the City were specifically named as having the greatest deficiencies. -' 5. How do you feel about the current level of recreation services in Meridian? The general consensus is that the level of service for parks on the basis of acres per 1000 persons must be raised in order to have sufficient land and parks to serve the people. a suggestion was made that the City at least try to reach 50% to 75% of the National Recreation & Parks Association Standard which is 8.0 acres per 1000 residents within the City boundary. 6. Are there any special needs or conditions for recreation facilities and programs that should be addressed? Most responses indicate special needs in the area of seniors, handicapped or mobility challenged and children within young families. The suggestions included more supervised leisure activities, especially after-school programs, Boys & -' Girls Clubs programs and the need for year around, indoor and outdoor recreation. 19 7. How do you feel about the City developing public partnerships to expand recreation services? With the exception of one response, all expressed the view that public partnerships with organizations such as the School District and other public institutions is appropriate and a positive way to advance recreation in Meridian. 8. How do you feel about the City developing private partnerships to expand recreation services? For Meridian to seek out and enter into private partnerships is viewed as a very positive step in advancing parks and recreation services. However, several cautions that centered on the need for the City to maintain control and stewardship of public resources and programs, along with concerns to be aware of pricing and profit motivations on the part of private industry. Some private non-profit -' organizations in the area of sports leagues and Boys & Girls Clubs would make good partners for the City. 9. Should the City look only to the taxpayer to support public recreation, or are there other funding sources that -' should be considered for Parks and Recreation? What role should user fees play if any? -' It is generally felt that the City should look at all possible sources of funds to capitalize and operate a Parks & Recreation System. When user fees are emphasized, they should be fair and reasonable and only for specialized activities. Additionally, the view was expressed to seek _ grants, charge park users who live outside the City more than Meridian residents and use developer fees to the extent — possible. 20 10. Of the following, what are the recreation service priorities in Meridian? Please rank in descending order, the — number "1" being the highest. League Sports Trails & Pathways Individual Sports Historical/ Cultural Passive/ Leisure Special Events/ Festivals RECREATION CATEGORY SCORE PRIORITY — League Sports 2.04 I St Passive/Leisure 3.08 2nd Individual Sports 3.28 3rd -' Special Events 3.60 4th Trails & Pathways 3.72 5th _ Historical & Cultural 4.32 6th NOTE: Numbers represent total average score by recreation category. 11. Are there specific areas of the City that you feel are currently under served when compared to other areas? The specific areas that are underserved include areas south of the freeway, downtown or central core area, and areas west of downtown. Some suggested that the northwest area is also under -served and a comment was made to follow the _ school's development pattern with parks. 12. Is there a need for a Community Recreation Center? How about a sports tournament complex, aquatic center or other major recreation facilities in Meridian? What are the benefits? With the exception of one or two, there was strong support _ for a Community Recreation Center to serve the people of Meridian. However, ways in which it would be implemented varied with some suggesting a private facility, some -' suggesting a public facility and most expressing the view that a Community Recreation Center may be an opportunity for a public/private partnership or joint venture. 21 Some commented that a community center should be linked to sports fields, or an aquatic center, or other high intensity use recreation facilities. 13. What kind of recreation activities do you feel are suitable for privatization or public/ private partnerships? There is consistency in the view that specialized facilities such as an aquatic center, sports tournament facilities, golf courses, special events centers, performing arts centers, skating rinks, rifle ranges and community recreation centers are facilities that are suitable for privatization or public/ private partnerships. 14. What are your views regarding local partnerships with -- other public agencies such as school districts for park facilities and recreation programs? Local partnerships with other public agencies, such as school districts are good, even necessary concept and way to advance parks and recreation services for the benefit of the public. Public partnerships are viewed as an effective way to improve level of services at the least cost to the —' taxpayer. Such agreements should be formalized and based on long term relationships and growth management practices to secure land, and use school facilities for recreation programs. 15. In your view, how can parks and recreation programs provide opportunities for improving social responsibility and leadership development in your community? Responses to this question varied widely and reflected individual perceptions as to the character of the population and ways in which parks and recreation would be of benefit. _ In general, there appears to be a consensus that public 22 recreation programs are most beneficial for children and youth and young families. Such resources, if adequate, can -- improve families and the social quality of neighborhoods while instilling a sense of personal and community pride in youth. 16. What are your views regarding the need for nature parks within the City? A predominant view is that Idaho itself, as well as areas outside the City, are "nature parks ". However, many expressed the desire to have some parkland dedicated to a park with a more natural and passive setting. Their view is centered on walking paths, water features, trees and a more natural landscape with open turf areas for simple passive -' play. To the degree that such a park could be created, it should take a lesser priority than traditional parks 17. How do you think the people of Meridian measure the value of parks and recreation programs in Meridian? How do you measure the value of recreation in Meridian? There is a strong consensus that parks and recreation ^' services high valued by the people of Meridian. However, in the view of some, the apparent lack of interest or value is manifest mostly by those ho have resided in Meridian for a long time. New members of the community are, however, deeply concerned about the lack of parks and recreation and are adamant that the City government takes a leadership role in addressing the development of parks and recreation facilities. 23 Comments The following are selected specific comments made by those persons interviewed. The comments are direct quotes from the interview response form. a) "I'm certainly not opposed to the development of parks. I am opposed, however, to the City competing with private enterprise regarding recreation. " b) "I greatly value recreation in meridian and hope my kids learn to enjoy the outdoors and many varied activities. The Meridian parks need to be developed and upgraded as the population grows. " c) "The City need's to make parks and recreation one of its highest priorities. It is something that residents can enjoy and use immediately. It creates goodwill between the City and its residents. " d) "Let's keep the family unity together. Involve at risk youth or any youth into programs. Mentoring." e) "I think providing a traveling parks & rec team from park to park or school to school to provide free services and opportunity to check out equipment for the day. " "Parks & Rec internship at the local high school taught life skills (CPR, etc.) Volunteer Support. " g) "We need to address the needs for parks & rec for youth, families & Senior citizens; and ways to finance these to get the job done. We are ready to move forward. " h) "We have a need to expand facilities and put money into providing recreational facilities for all age ranges and economic classes. " i) "My opinion is that the more programs you can offer the general public, the better. If you initially offer a program that is disorganized, or not well supervised, it will fail. Begin designs for the initial presentation of the programs to be well organized & supervised, and it will be profitable for years to come. " j) "Cater programs to the youth, make them responsible citizens and expect adults to fund their own recreation, for the most part. " k) `I feel the City needs to really listen to the majority of the people; especially the established programs not just a few small groups. " Z) "The City of meridian needs to become involved with organizations that provide for our children. Currently, _ Meridian Babe Ruth receives no space from Parks & Rec. We rely entirely on the schools. If we ever lost the use of these fields we would have no place to play. " m) "Thanks for allowing me to share my views & also represent the seniors of Meridian, Idaho. " 25 2.3 Needs Assessment The predominant need is to improve existing parkland owned by the City and improve facilities within established parks. When the _ 56 -acre community park and 6.7 acre Chateau Park are fully developed, the City will have 98.5 acres of operational parks. By recognizing Fuller Park and Tammy Street Pocket park as recreation assets, 27.1 additional acres may be included in the context of parkland available to Meridian residents. The result of such improvements and park resources recognition is that 125.6 acres of Parks would be made available. Using the suggested Level of Service (LOS) standard of 6.0 acres per 1,000 residents and the 1999 population level of 37,735, there would be established a 3.3 acre per 1,000 level of service. Thus, the deficiency would be 2.7 acres per 1,000, which equates to the need to acquire a minimum of 100 additional acres to meet current demand. It is noted, however, that the population within the city of meridian continues to grow at an aggressive rate. Thus, the land requirements, even at a 6.0 acre LOS will continue to increase over time. Considering the projected population growth within Meridian for 2005 and 2010, the following table indicates the probable amount of parkland that would be necessary to sustain a 6.0 acre per 1,000 level of service standard. 26 Table 2- 1 City of Meridian Parkland Needs 1999 — 2005 - 2010 YEAR POPULATION P M \ND 1999 37,735 226.4 Ac. 2005 48,200 289.2 Ac. 2010 92,500 555.0 Ac. ,r SOURCE. Landerman-Moore Associates Selection and organization of parkland into park units should be done on the basis of NRPA park classifications and facilities design standards. Such standards will indicate the type of facilities and improvements to be made within a participating park unit. However, consideration of the recreation categories discussed in the workshops and provided through key person interviews, and the priority rankings provided by Question 10 of the interview, should guide specific design decisions for park development. The workshops and interview information indicate a need to focus parks and recreation development efforts on two (2) park classifications; these being Neighborhood Parks and Community Parks. Also, there is a need to develop additional trails and pathways which support the needs of various users including walkers joggers and bicyclists. T The progression of parkland acquisition and new park development within the city over the next 10 years should be designed to achieve and maintain the 6.0 acres per 1000 resident population LOS. This includes acquisition of 100 additional acres to meet current needs, and a continuing land acquisition program to grow the Parks & Recreation System with the population. 27 The following table identifies the projected number of acres and new parks, required to meet the LOS Standard, by their respective classifications for development during the time period of 2000, 2005, 2010 and beyond. Table 2-2 _ City of Meridian Land Acquisition & Park Needs 2000, 2005 & 2010+ TIME LAND PARK NUMBER TOTAL. PERIOD REQUIRED CLASSIFICATIONS OF PARKS ACRES 2000 100.0 Ac. Community Parks 2 75.0 Ac. Neighborhood Parks 2 15.0 Ac. — Trails & Pathways (all classes) 10.0 Ac. 2005 62.8 Ac. Community Parks 1 25.0 Ac. _ Neighborhood Parks 3 22.0 Ac. Trails & Pathways (all classes) 15.8 Ac. 2010+ 265.8 Ac. Community Parks 3 150.0 Ac. –' Neighborhood Parks 5 50.0 Ac. Trails & Pathways (all classes) 65.8 Ac. Totals 428.6 Ac. Park Units: 16 428.6 Ac. NOTE: Land acquisition requirements are based on a 6.0 acre/ per 1,000 level of service standard. SOURCE: Landerman-Moore Associates Illustration 2-1 Meridian Recreation Service Areas Area 1 Area 2 4000 0 4000 Feet Legend City Limits County Owned Land Note: Recreation Service Areas 1 & 2 Divided By Interstate 84 Landerman-Moore Associates Robert W. Droll, Landscape Architect PS Area 1 Area 2 Section 3 Park Facilities Development & Operations Objectives This section discusses park and recreation development objectives in terms of parkland acquisition and development of new parks and recreation facilities. 3.1 Parkland Acquisition Parkland acquisition requirements described in Section 2 indicate a need to secure 100 additional acres to serve the current population at a level of service of 6.0 acres per 1,000 population. If the City of Meridian continues to grow in terms of population over the next ten years at a rate similar to previous years, the population could reach about 92,500. If such a population is realized, at or beyond the year 2010, the City would require a total of 555 acres of parkland. Acquisition & Development As previously discussed, the view of the public is to give priority to land acquisition and improve all existing parks and develop the 56 - acre community park and Chateau Park. In this regard, the following applies: 29 Priority One: Projects identified in the year 2000 Capital Outlay Program. These are projects, which —. have been determined to be of importance, or which meet identified needs of the community such as the 56 -acre community parks and Chateau Park. It is anticipated that these projects would be implemented within the next three years. Land acquisition in Recreation Service Area No. 2, south of the I-84 Freeway, should also be given first priority. Priority Two: Projects that should be planned for implementation by 2005. These projects meet a Level of Service (LOS) of 6.0 acres/ 1,000 and are considered important development objectives. Priority Three: Projects that meet long-term needs and should be planned for implementation by 2010. Such projects should meet the LOS standard and overall park and recreation needs in response to the actual population of Meridian based on the 2010 Census. 3.2 New Parks Development Objectives Development objectives for new parks beyond existing parks and parkland owned by the City, and within Recreation Service Areas 1 & 2 are identified by park classification, number of park units and total acres to be acquired or developed. 30 A-" 0-0 0-4 .-. * Requires parkland acquisition SOURCE: Landerman-Moore Associates Table 3-1 City of Meridian Parks Development Program Year 2000 RECREATION PARK NUMBER TOTAL SERVICE AREA CLASSIFICATION OF PARKS ACRES 1 Community Park 1 56.0 Ac. Neighborhood Park 1 6.7 Ac. 2 Community Parks 2 * 75.0 Ac. 2 Neighborhood Parks 2 * 15.0 Ac. (Land Acquisition for Trails & Pathways) 10.0 Ac. Totals: Park Units: 6 162.7 Ac. * Requires parkland acquisition SOURCE: Landerman-Moore Associates Totals: Park Units: 4 62.8 Ac. NOTE: Land acquisition is required for all park development programmed for the year 2005. SOURCE.- Landerman-Afoore Associates 31 Table 3-2 City of Meridian Parks Development Program Year 2005 RECREATION PARK NUMBER TOTAL SERVICE AUA CLASSIFICATION OF PARKS ACRES 1 Community Park 1 25.0 Ac. Neighborhood Park 1 7.0 Ac. (Land Acquisition for Trails & Pathways) 15.8 Ac. 2 Neighborhood Parks 2 15.0 Ac. Totals: Park Units: 4 62.8 Ac. NOTE: Land acquisition is required for all park development programmed for the year 2005. SOURCE.- Landerman-Afoore Associates 31 Table 3-3 City of Meridian Parks Development Program Year 2010+ RL -'CREATION PARK NUMBER TOTAL SERVICE ARBA CLASSIFICATION OF PARKS A IU S 1 Community Parks 2 100.0 Ac. Neighborhood Park 3 22.0 Ac. _ (Land Acquisition for Trails & Pathways) 35.8 Ac. 2 Community Park 1 50.0 Ac. Neighborhood Parks 2 28.0 Ac. (Land Acquisition for Trails & Pathways) 30.0 Ac. Totals: Park Units: 8 265.8 Ac. NOTE: Land acquisition is required for all park development programmed for the year 2010 and beyond. SOURCE. Landerman-Moore Associates 3.3 Recreation Facilities The type and space allocation of facilities to be included in park _ design is accomplished by adapting the suggested NRPA Standards for park classification based on the population ratio method. The following identifies suggested facilities and space standards to be used to guide design decisions for a particular park unit. There is, however, considerable flexibility as to the type and scope of facilities to be developed and the space allocation to -- accommodate them. Thus, the overall size requirements of a specific park and the level of facility development may expand or shrink accordingly. 32 Table 3- 4 City of Meridian s Facility — Space Standards for Neighborhood Parks RI -,,S PARK FACILITY ADJOINING SCHOOL SETARATE PARK Play Apparatus Area – pre-school .25 .25 Play Apparatus Area – older children .25 .25 Paved Multi-purpose Courts .50 .50 Recreation Center Building * .25 Sports Fields * 5.00 Senior Citizens' Area .50 .50 — Quiet Areas & Outdoor Classroom 1.00 1.00 Open or "free play" Area .50 .50 Family Picnic Area 1.00 1.00 Off-street Parking * 2.30** Sub Total 4.00 11.55 �.. Landscaping (buffer and special areas) 2.50 3.00 Undesignated Space 65 1.45 Total 7.15 16.00 * Provide by elementary ,drool * * Based on 25 cars @ 400 sq. ft. per car. .-, SOURCE. Landerman-Moore Associates NOTE: A Neighborhood Park may or may not include the facilities indicated. Priority should be given to specific neighborhood or recreation service needs. 33 Table 3- 5 City of Meridian ^ Facility - Space Standards for Community Parks : DI.' k 11, \Clil S PARK FACILITY \-JOINING SCHOOL SEPARA1E? PARK r Play Apparatus Area - pre-school .35 .35 Play Apparatus Area - older children .35 1.50 Paved Multi-purpose Courts 1.25 1.75 ^ Tennis Complex 1.00 1.50 Recreation Center Building * 2.00 Sports Fields 2.00 12.00 ^ Senior Citizens' Complex 1.90 1.90 Open or "free play" Area 4.00 5.00 Archery Range ^ .75 .75 Swimming Pool 1.00 1.00 Outdoor Theater .50 1.50 ^ Ice Rink (artificial) 1.00 1.00 Family Picnic Area 4.00 4.00 Outdoor Classroom Area 1.00 1.00 Off-street Parking 1.50 5.0 Sub Total 20.60 40.25 Landscaping (buffer and special areas) 3.00 6.00 Undesignated Space (10%) 2.06 4.03 Total 25.66 50.28 ^ * Provide Jr. or Sr. I ligh School * * Based on 544 cars n 400,,(1. ft. per car. --• SOURCE: Landerman-Moore Associo[es NOTE: A Community Park may or may not include the facilities indicated. ,.., Priority should be given to specific community or recreation service needs. 34 Illustration 3-1 Comprehensive Parks & Recreation System Plan Area 1 Meridian Community Park Chateau Pad[, , Meighborhood Park th St. Che Lane Park Oolfu�e Linden © Elementary School �Iler Cherry Ln. Meridian Legend ■ * Community Park • * Neighborhood Park 4000 0 4000 Feet City Limits County Owned Land *Symbol denotes need for park classification in Lenderman -Moore Associates Recreation Service Area (but not specific location) Robert IN. Droll, Landscape Architect PS 3.4 Park & Recreation Department Mission Statement ,.. The Department's Mission Statement is generally to provide opportunities and encourage participation in life enhancing activities through developed and well maintained parks, recreation programming and services. In this regard, the Department has established certain goals, which are expressed as follows. a. Meet the needs of the community through providing well- designed, safe and user-friendly parks, recreation facilities, programs and services. b. Meet the park and recreation needs of youth, families, and senior citizens. Collaborate with citizens, businesses, School District, social agencies, service clubs, and local agencies to provide the highest quality Park and Recreation programs and service possible. c. Maintain community and user group cooperation and communication for highest and best use of park resources. d. Monitor public recreation needs through periodic surveys (5 -year interval) and develop, maintain and improve Park & Recreation facilities and infrastructure pursuant to needs and amendments to the Meridian Comprehensive Parks & — Recreation System Plan. The following chart is a suggested organizational structure for the Park & Recreation Department based on its functional activities. 35 3.5 Park & Recreation Department Organization Existing Park & Recreation Department Administration Park & Recreation Director Administrative Assistant Parks Superintendent Groundskeepers I, II, III Seasonal Parks Worker Recreation Superintendent Program Supervisor Class Instructor As the Parks & recreation Department grows to a sufficient level of service to sustain administration, recreation services, operations and maintenance, its organizational structure may change. The following chart is a suggested organizational adjustment, which may be considered in the future. 36 RECREATION PROGRAMS & SERVICES • Youth & Teen • Recreation & Education • Community Events • Cultural Arts • Sports Leagues • Special Publications • Rentals Park & Recreation Department Administration PARK & RECRE.ITION DIRECTOR OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE • Park Maintenance • Park Improvements • Sports Services • Community Events • Warehousing • Equipment Management • Custodial Contracts • Facility Maintenance • Contract Service 37 ADMINIS 1Z,\TIVE SERVICES Registration Accounting Clerical CAPITAL PROJECTS • Land Acquisition • Planning • Facility Design • Construction Management 3.6 Recreation Programs -. The objective of Recreation Program Services is to provide opportunities and encourage participation in life enhancing activities expanded use of facilities, by programming and services '- on a year-round basis. Recreation programming and services are a functional response tv demand patterns influenced by public demand. The Department has organized its recreation programs schedule by season of the -' year (winter, spring, summer and fall), and by recreation categories. The following recreation activities are recommended to be provided by local or area user groups and, where appropriate, the Department of Parks & Recreation. Recreation Activities Adult Basketball Dance Team Open Gym Adult Volleyball Dog Obedience Community Education Adult Tap Dance Financial Seminars Rock Climbing Adult Watercolor Girls Fastpitch Softball Rubber Stamping -- Advanced Water-based Workshop Senior Volleyball Painting Hip Hop/ Jazz Dance Spring Break Day Camp After-school Recreation Hip/Hop Step Sunshine Generation _ Baby-sitting Basics Aerobics Preschool Performance Ballet/Jazz/Tap Home Buying Seminars Tai -Chi Coaches & Parents Indoor Play Teen Basketball Baseball Clinic Intro to Cheerleading Teen Challenge Drama Club Creative Movement Little Gym Tumbling Teen Night Cross Training Aerobics Little League Water Aerobics Dance (Drop-in) Baseball Skills _ The following is a functional diagram indicating the various program categories a Recreation Program Manager may coordinate with private organizations or administer when the Department is "' program service provider. Functional Structure Recreation Program Manager RECREATION MANAGER YOUTH & GENERAL CON UNITY ATHLETIC' ARTS & TEEN RECREATION & CULTURAL LEAGUES CRAFTS EVENTS * Athletic league activities are managed by league organizations and coordinated by -' the Department for field usage. Based on the needs assessment found in Section 2, which includes the workshops and key person interviews, the recreation programming objectives are stated by the general recreation categories as follows: 1. League Sports - This activity has significant and continuing importance to the youth of Meridian. The primary service providers are established league organizations within the community and area. The function of the Department is primarily to coordinate and schedule the use _ of the City's sports fields and any league sports facilities that may be developed. As the level of league sports activity increases and new facilities are developed, the City should consider participating in the promotion or sponsorship of league tournaments thus taking a more participatory role in sporting events. For the interim, the City can develop agreements with various league sports organizations to coordinate league sports activities. 39 2. Individual Sports - The participation/ demand level for individual sports indicates a greater need for programming. Programming and facilities for individual sports should be increased significantly. This activity can be facilitated through contract classes or training programs, interlocal agreements and scheduling facilities for individual access requirements. 3. Passive Recreation Activities - Classes and programs that serve general passive recreation activities requirements should be organized to respond to expressed demand. The type and level of services are closely dependent on public interest, season, and the availability of facilities. There is a wide variety of programs and services that could be offered, however, a determination of which program emphasis must come from expressed interests. 4. Trails & Pathways - This recreation activity is highly individualized. However, there are a number of program categories that maybe considered. Depending on the location, distance and design of the trail systems, programming may include: Walk-A-Thons Bicycle Regattas/ Races 5 K or 10 K Runs Nature Study Walks/ Tours Marathons Special Events Programming trails for group participation greatly enhances trail awareness and use of the trail system. Community trail clean-up programs can be instituted, which tends to establish greater appreciation for trails. '— 5. Historical & Cultural - There is a moderate need for historical and cultural programming. The development of historical pageants, tours and themed events linked to park sites and places of historic significance should be considered. Seminars, classes and special programs may be offered to establish appreciation of historical and cultural values. 6. Special Events, Festivals & Concerts - The need for this type of recreation activity has been expressed. The City may consider serving in three different, but related, capacities: 1) Event Producer, 2) Events Co - Producer and 3) Landlord. Each role provides opportunity for the City to promote special event activities to a wide range of participants. 40 Types of special events programming include concerts, arts and crafts fairs, holiday themed events, cultural festivals and commemoration events such as the City's Annual Birthday Celebration. 7. Special Populations - The needs senior citizens and people with disabilities can be served by classes, special events and programs designed to provide physical and mental enhancement. Such activities should be organized and coordinated with representatives of those organizations who represent special populations. 3.7 Senior Programs & Services Special consideration should be given to senior citizen _ participation in recreation programs and leisure activities provided by local organizations or the Department. Recreation programs and services that may be provided to senior citizens include classes, sports programs, special events and other recreation services provided outlined as follows: Classes Beginning Bridge Baroque & Rococo Art Country Western Dance FIT (Aerobics) Ballet Modern Art Tai Chi Native & Colonist Art Intermediate Bridge Workshops Bells' Dancing Insurance Clinic Memory Loss Financial Roundtable Food Stamps Legally Speaking Stay Safe Around Animals Airport Update Ladies Only Golf Masterpieces of Venice Beginning Tai Chi Beginning Movement Ballroom Dance Country Line Dance Pen & Ink Intermediate Tai Chu 55 Alive Driving Cancer & Estate Planning Mind & Body Teach Old Dogs New Tricks A Healthy Digestive System Living Well with Vision Changes 41 Horticulture Tap Dance World Travelogue If You Want to Write Ballroom, Patterns &:Mixers Watercolor Painting Intro to Computers Belly Dancing Renaissance Art Walkers of All Ages Are You Sleeping Okay? Arthritis Pain 'Management Diabetes Computer Lab Common Foot Problems in Older Adults Taking die Stress out of Holiday Fun Learn How Your Property Taxes are .Assessed Health Care Directives & :Advanced Directives Travel/ Trips Hawaiian Cruise Las Vegas, Nevada Santa Fe, New hfexico Special Events Sunday .Afternoon Dances Sweethearts Dance %Vellness Team Practical Tips to Lower Your Blood Pressure Understanding .Alzheimer's Disease Quick Healthy Meals for One or Two People Theater Festivals Shakespearean Festival Beach Day .Annual Senior Picnic 3.8 Park Operations/ Maintenance Osteoporosis: .A Battle of the Bones Taking the Chill Out of Freezing Mississippi Queen Cruise Mystery Trip Grandparent's Day Summer Fling Dance The Mission of Park Operations & Maintenance is to provide safe, aesthetically pleasing and usable parks and recreation facilities for the public. This responsibility can be administered by implementing a maintenance management system that is essential _ to protect the quality and value of public parks. The are three (3) basic elements of the maintenance management system. These are: Mission & Objectives Statement Organizational Arrangement Systems & Procedures. 42 Mission & Objectives Mission & Objectives are organized on the basis of the four key functional categories listed below. • Develop and implement regularly scheduled routine, reactive, and preventive maintenance programs. • Develop and implement maintenance and operation support, scheduled and coordinated with recreation programs and special events. • Develop and administer the Department's Capital Outlay Program and identify maintenance implications for proposed capital outlay projects. • Develop and coordinate the City's special projects involving new or temporary construction, park or facility modifications, and equipment or furniture transport, set-up and removal. Organizational Arrangement Departmental organization changes should be considered on the _ basis of providing a more functional arrangement of "in-house" maintenance activities with private contracted services assigned to certain routine maintenance tasks. The in-house or departmental positions are linked to basic _ preventative and normal routine maintenance activities. The number of personnel required to perform tasks for various functions should be based on the number of acres and the scope of facilities that require maintenance. _ The Park Maintenance Manager or similar classification oversees day to day scheduling and coordination with recreation program services staff, record keeping, purchase/ work order requests and general filing. 43 The following organizational chart is structured for basic functions of park operations and maintenance services. Functional Organization Structure PARK MAINTENANCE MANAGER La GROUNDS MAINTENANCE STRUCTURES NfAINTENANCE SECTION SECTION 1.b LC EQUIPNfENT & SUPPLY ELECTRICAL & MECHANICAL SECTION SECTION l.d Le The following describes the functions of each category of maintenance services identified in the maintenance organization diagram. 44 Table 3-6 Parks Maintenance .� Job Descriptions La - PARK INLUNTENANCE \L-�NAGER • Budget Planning & Control • Job & Workload Scheduling • Maintenance Performance Reporting • Records .Management "" • Coordination with Recreation Program Services Lb - GROUNDS MAINTENANCE SECTION • Rounds - safety inspection and general clean-up. • Turf - mow, edge, trim, weed, create, top dress, overseed. • Plants - trees, scrubs, ground cover, seasonal planting, train, trim, special watering and weed control. • Clinical - fertilizer and pesticide application. • Sports Areas -Fields - special maintenance and set-up, courts, cleaning and refurbishment. • Play Equipment - inspect, clean, rake, groom to a constant depth. ^, Lc - STRUCTURES K-UNTENANCE SECTION • Custodial - janitorial services, building room set-up, general building up -keep. • Carpentry - wood construction and repairs, cabinetry, sign installation and repair and general repairs. • Paint & Sign - interior and exterior painting, paint courts and parking lots stripes. • Plumbing - irrigation systems, sinks, toilets, drinking fountains, faucets, dish washer and drainage systems. �+ • Concrete/ Asphalt - Form and pour concrete, lay and seal hot or cold asphalt, overlay, fog seal or slurry coat asphalt. Ld - ELECTRICAL & MECHANICAL SECTION • Electrical - wiring, conduits, switch boxes and power outlets, electrical lights. • HVAC - heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment and systems, mechanical equipment. • Safety - alarms, security lights, emergency lock -ups, fire extinguishers, kitchen stove and .. fire systems. Le - EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES SECTION • Equipment Replacement - automotive and equipment acquisition and replacement, trucks, .--, tractors mowers, specialty equipment. • Equipment Maintenance - scheduled maintenance and repairs needed to keep equipment in a safe and efficient working condition. �-. • Fuel Management - gasoline and diesel and lubricants used for equipment. • Tool Room - Control tools distribution and maintain inventory. • Warehouse - supply purchasing, storage, control and distribution (trash bags, paint, and other products) .�. • Furniture Inventory & Control SOURCE. Landerntan-Moore Associates 45 Some maintenance service requirements may be contracted with private service providers. Overall responsibility for contracting maintenance -related work should be assigned to the Park Maintenance Manager. Guidelines should be developed for establishing the basis of contracting outside services. Considerations for private maintenance services may include: • Statutory/ Legal Requirements • Cost & Scope of Work Performed • Manpower & Special Skills Requirements • Special Tool or Equipment Use Requirements Short-term contracts may be covered by a work order which identify the purpose of work requested, contractors name, location of work, cost information (materials and labor) and other key information. Long-term contracts (one-year or longer) should be established on the basis of competitive bidding. Those activities which may be fall to long-term service agreements include routine HVAC systems, electrical vaults, lighting, major painting projects and other minor capital projects involving facilities repair or infrastructure improvements. Systems & Procedures Systems and procedures will help to ensure effective work programs involving maintenance services. Normally, a single "work order" system is employed. Several systems and procedures should be considered for an —' effective maintenance management system. The following descriptions are provided. 46 a. Develop a Facility Inventory Record System: • Description and location of facility (site). • Date of construction and/ or installation of an improvements to site or structures. • Areas (types) in terms of square feet, linear feet or volume. • Fixtures and mechanical/ electrical equipment descriptions. • Location of reference materials, drawings, specifications, technical data, manufacturers maintenance manuals and technical literature. • Other pertinent data regarding construction or maintenance of the site/ facility. • Create a facilities inventory file system including computer based data retrieval. b. Prepare a Maintenance Workloads Schedule: • All routine maintenance schedules should describe facilities, grounds and equipment service requirements in relation to manpower, materials and equipment or tools required to perform the required tasks. • Define maintenance levels in order of magnitude (I, II, I1I & IV) with Level I being the highest service level of preventive maintenance task scheduling and Level IV being the lowest, often deferred tasks level. • Schedule capital outlay and maintenance projects on the basis of pre -determined "project" labor and material requirements so as to reduce impacts on normal maintenance workloads. • Develop an on-going program of routine, reactive and preventive maintenance using an inventory performance standard and calendar task spread sheet as shown in the example of Table 3-10. C. Organize an Inspection & Reporting Procedure Formation of a program of regular inspection of the Park System should include the following procedures. • Identify maintenance deficiencies and make corrective recommendations for action and budgeting. 47 • Identify potential failures of plant life, structures, utility systems and mechanical systems. • Adopt a procedures and set of written instructions regarding what is to be inspected, measurements to be taken and service requirements. • Establish a system of posting inspection records for follow-up on required maintenance services or repair items. The following are examples for organizing and managing a maintenance management system for the City of Meridian. _ City of Meridian Parks & Recreation Department Maintenance Management System Level I Services The highest level of routine preventive maintenance services applied to high quality landscape improvements with high traffic areas such as plazas, play equipment, neighborhood parks and community parks. 1. TURF CARE - GRASS - Grass height maintained according to species and variety of grass. Mowed at least once every five working days, but may be as often as once every three working .., days. Aeration as required, not less than four times per year. Reseeding or sodding as needed. Weed control should be practiced so that no more than one percent of the surface has weeds present. Some pre -emergent products may be utilized at this level. 2. FERTILIZER - Adequate fertilizer level to ensure that all plant materials are healthy and growing vigorously. Amounts depend on species, length of growing season, soils and rainfall. Distribution should ensure an even supply of nutrients for the entire year. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium percentage should follow local recommendations from the County Extension ^ Service. Trees, shrubs and flowers should receive fertilizer levels to ensure optimum growth. 3. IRRIGATION - Sprinkler irrigated. Electric automatic commonly used. Some manual systems could be considered adequate under plentiful rainfall circumstances and adequate staffing. Frequency of use following rainfalls, temperature, seasonal length and demands of plants material. 4. LITTER CONTROL - Minimum of once per day, 7 days per week. 13xtremcly high visitation may increase the frequency. Receptacles should be plentiful enough to hold all trash generated between servicing 5. PRUNING - Usually done at least once per season unless species planted dictate more frequent attention. Sculptured hedges or high growth species may dictate a more frequent requirement than most trees and shrubs in natural, growth style plantings. G. DISEASES & INSECT CONTROL - Usually done when disease or insects are inflicting noticeable damage, reducing vigor of plant materials or could be considered a bother to the public. Some preventative measures may be utilized such as systemic chemical treatments, ~" 48 .. cultural prevention of disease problems can reduce time spent in this category. some minor problems may be tolerated at this level. 7. SNOW REMOVAL - Snow removal by noon the day following snowfall. Gravel or snowmelt ... may be utilized to reduce ice accumulation on walkways. 8. LIGHTING - Replacement on a scheduled frequency and/ or repair of fixtures when observed or reported not working. �. 9. SURFACES - Should be cleaned, repaired, repainted or replaced when appearance has noticeably deteriorated. 10. REPAIRS - Repairs to all park elements of the design should be done immediately upon discovery provided replacements parts and technicians are available to accomplish the job. When disruption to the public might be major, repairs may be postponed to a time period that is less disruptive. 11. INSPECTION - Inspections of this area should be done daily by a trained staff member. 12. FLORAL PLANTINGS - Some sort of floral planting present. Normally no more complex than two rotations of bloom per year. Care cycle usually at least once per week except watering may be more frequent. Health and vigor dictate cycle of fertilization and disease control. Beds ^ essentially kept weed free. 13. RESTROOMS - When in seasonal use should be maintained at least once per day as long as they are open to public. High use may dictate two servicings per day. Servicing period should ensure " an adequate supply of paper and that restrooms are reasonably clean and free from foul odors. 14. SPECIAL FEATURE'S - Should be maintained for safety, function and high quality appearance as per established design. Level II Services The moderate level of maintenance services for locations with moderate level of development and visitation rates. 1. TURF CARE - Cut once every 5 working days. Normally not aerated unless turf quality indicates a need or in anticipation of an application of fertilizer. Reseeding or sodding done only when major bare spots appear. Weed control measures normally used when 50 percent of small areas is weed infested or general turf quality low in 15 percent or more of the surface. 2. FERTILIZER - Applied only when turf vigor seems to be low. Low level application done on a once per year basis. Rate suggested is one-half the level recommended for species and variety. ... 3. IRRIGATION - Dependent on climate. Rainfall locations above 25 inches a year usually rely on natural rainfall with the possible addition of portable irrigation during periods of drought. When irrigation is automatic, a demand schedule is programmed. Wherc manual servicing is required, two to three times per week operation would be the norm. 4. Lrr ER CONTROL- Minimum service of two to three times per week. I ligh use may dictate higher levels during warm weather. .—. 5. PRUNING - When required for health or reasonable appearance. With most tree and shrub species this would not be more frequent than once every two or three years. -. 49 0- 6. DISE-ASF & iNS11,'CT CONTROL, - Done only on epidemic or serious complaint basis. Pest, weed and rodent control measures may be put into effect when the health or survival of the plant material is threatened or where public's comfort is concerned. ^ 7. SNOW REMOVAL- Snow removal done based on local law requirements but generally accomplished by the day following snowfall. Some crosswalks or surfaces may not be cleared at all. 8. LIGHTING - Replacement or repair of fixtures when report filed or when noticed by ^ employees. 9. SURFACE'S- Cleaned on complaint basis. Repaired or replaced as budget allows. 10. REPAIRS - Should be done whenever schedules will allow, but should be done immediately when safety or function is in question. 11. INSPECTIONS - Once per week. ~ 12. FLORAL PLANTING - Only perennials or flowering trees or shrubs. 13. RESTROONIS - When present, serviced minimum of 5 times per week. Seldom more than once per day. 14. SPECIAL FEATURES - Minimum allowable maintenance for features present with function and safety in mind. Level III Services A moderately low level of maintenance, deferred maintenance and remedial maintenance activity associated with sites or facilities that have low-6sitor rates. .� 1. TURF CARE - Low frequency mowing schedule based on species. Low growing grassed may not be mowed. High grassed may receive periodic mowing to aid public use or reduce fire danger. Weed control limited to legal requirement of noxious weeds. r. 2. FERTILIZER- Not fertilized. 3. IRRIGATION - No irrigation. 4. 111YE'R CONTROL- Once per week or less. Complaint may increase above one servicing. 5. PRUNING- No regular trimming. Safetv of damage from weather may dictate actual work schedule. G. DISFASV & INSFCT CONTROL. - None except where epidemic and epidemic condition threatens resource or people. ^ T SN( AV RI{NIOVAL - None except where major access ways or active parking areas dictate the need. 8. I.IG1 ITING - Replacement on compliant or employee discovery. 9. SURFACFS - Replaced or repaired when safety is a concern and when budget is available. 10. RI:PAIRS - Should be done when safety is a concern and when budget is available. �, 50 I . INSPECTIONS - Once per month. 12. FLOR\L PLANTINGS - None, may have wild flowers, perennials, flowering trees or shrubs in place. 13. RF,SIROOMS - When present, five time per week. 14. SPECIAL FEATURES - Minimum maintenance to allow safe use. Level IV Services Minimum maintenance, very low visitor rate and areas of undeveloped land. 1. TURF AREAS - Not mowed. Weed control only if legal requirement demand it. 2. FERTILIZER - Not fertilized. 3. IRRIGATION - No irrigation. ... 4. LITER CONTROL - On demand or complaint basis. 5. PRUNING - No pruning unless safety is involved. .�. G. DISEASE & INSECT CONTROL - No control except in epidemic or safety situations. 7. SNOW REMOVAL - No snow removal. ►-� 8. LIGHTING- Replacement on compliant basis. 9. SURFACES - Serviced when safety is consideration. 10. REPAIRS - Should be done when safety or function is in question. 11. INSPECTION - Once per quarter or every 3 months. 12. FLORAL PLANTINGS - None. 13. RESIROOMS - Service based on need. 14. SPECIAL FEATURES - Service based on lowest acceptable frequency for feature. 15. Safety and function interruption a concern when either seem significant. P-" 51 52 Section 4 Costs & Funding This section projects probable costs for land acquisition, site and facility development and Operations & Maintenance services. 4.1 Acquisition & Development Costs Cost projections for land acquisition and development and operations and maintenance services are described in the following text.. Units of cost, that is to say dollars per acre or some other cost unit are based on 1) 1999 dollar values; 2) the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the Boise SMSA; and 3) comparative values of land by land use category. Acquisition Costs Land suitable for parks will normally be prime property located in areas where real estate interests have established valuation levels. In this regard, it is anticipated that parkland will have a relatively high assessed value. Since, it is not known what specific sites, locations and/ or land classifications will be included in an acquisition program, comparative values in 1999 dollar values are used. 53 It should be noted that the actual cost of land will vary greatly depending on the size and location of properties, sellers' interests and terms sought and/or agreed to by and between the seller and the City of Meridian. The following illustrates comparative raw land values which are averaged on a per acre basis for the City of Meridian. 0— Table 4-1 .. Comparative Land Values 1999 LAND CA'EGORY COST PER ACRE/(000';) Residential $ 20 to $ 25 /per Ac. Commercial $152 to $348 / per Ac. Institutional $ 25 to $ 30 /per Ac. SOURCE: John L. Scott Real Estate, Meridian, Idaho Landerman-Moore Associates .. In order to reduce land acquisition costs, the City may consider acquiring land through dedicated, traded, lease/purchase, .. easements or through interlocal agreements with the school district and other public agencies. The most appropriate land values used to identify probable acquisition costs is based on the Institutional Land category, which is reported to have a value range of $25,000 to $30,000 per acre. It is recognized that land acquisition would be undertaken over the �- long-term and it is anticipated that real estate values will increase significantly. However, it is appropriate to establish a sense of overall acquisition costs for the projected acres needed. 54 Totals 428.6 $8.6 M to $12.9 M NOTE: Total cost range amounts have been rounded to the nearest $100. SOURCE: John L. Scott Real Estate, Meridian, Idaho Landerman-Moore Associates Site/ Facilities Development Costs by Park Classification The following represents development cost projected by park classification. Costs are expressed in 1999 dollar values and based on comparisons of park development projects in the Boise/ Ada County region. Table 4-3 Capital Development Cost Projections by Park Classification PARK CLASSIFICATION (OtiT/A W_jOCx)'ti) Neighborhood Parks $ 80 - $ 120 Community Parks $ 85 - $ 150 Trails & Pathways $ 20 - $ 35 L.F. Special Use Park ( varies ) SOURCE: Landerman-Moore Associates Robert W. Droit, Landscape Architect, PS 55 Table 4-2 Land Acquisition Cost Projections ( 1999 Dollar Values) YEAR ACRES V \1 'F RANGE (000',) COST 2000 100.0 $25 to $30/ac. $2.0 M to $3.0 M 2005 62.8 $25 to $30/ac. $1.3 M to $1.9 M 2010+ 265.8 $25 to $30/ac. $5.3 M to $8.0 M Totals 428.6 $8.6 M to $12.9 M NOTE: Total cost range amounts have been rounded to the nearest $100. SOURCE: John L. Scott Real Estate, Meridian, Idaho Landerman-Moore Associates Site/ Facilities Development Costs by Park Classification The following represents development cost projected by park classification. Costs are expressed in 1999 dollar values and based on comparisons of park development projects in the Boise/ Ada County region. Table 4-3 Capital Development Cost Projections by Park Classification PARK CLASSIFICATION (OtiT/A W_jOCx)'ti) Neighborhood Parks $ 80 - $ 120 Community Parks $ 85 - $ 150 Trails & Pathways $ 20 - $ 35 L.F. Special Use Park ( varies ) SOURCE: Landerman-Moore Associates Robert W. Droit, Landscape Architect, PS 55 Based on park needs and development objectives identified in Sections 2 & 3, the following is a projection of probable park development costs. actual costs may vary due to time, specific site and facilities design and the value of the dollar for construction labor, materials and equipment. Table 4-4 City of Meridian Parks Development Cost Projections (1999 Dollar Values) CLASSIFICATION ACRES COti F / ACRFS (1x10',) TOTALS Neighborhood Parks 93.7 Community Parks 306.0 Trails & Pathways * 91.6 ( 332,508 L.F.) $80 to $120 $85 to $150 $20 to $35 (L.F.) $7.5Mto$11.2 M $26.0 M to $45.9 M $6.7 M to $11.6 M * Conversion from acres to lineal feet assumes an average 12 ft. wide trail and pathway system. SOURCE. Landerman-Moore Associates The combined cost projections for land acquisition and facilities development as identified in Sections 2 & 3, addressing park and recreation development objectives is indicated in the following table. The figures shown are merely indicators of the magnitude of cost associated with building a parks and recreation system that supports the needs of Meridian residents at a Level of Service (LOS) standard of 6.0 acres per 1,000 residents. 56 $48.8 to $81.6 * The acreage amount shown does not include the 56 -acre community park site and the 6.7 acre Chateau Park site. SOURCE: Landerman-Moore Associates The preparation of master plans for the 56 -acre community park and Chateau Park has provided development cost information. At the time of submittal of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Parks & Recreation System Plan, the development costs for Chateau Park is $785,000 and the development costs for the 56 -acre community park is separated into three phases as follows: Phase 1 $ 1,994,000 Phase 2 $ 4,520,000 Phase 3 $ 3,824,000 This data is included here as a matter of information in regard to the City's current planning activity. 57 Table 4-5 City of Meridian ^ Park & Recreation System Land Acquisition & Development Cost Projections (1999 Dollar Values) FUNCTION ACDI:ti PIZ JECIIM RANGE (mdhons) Land Acquisition 428.6 * $8.6 to $12.9 — Neighborhood Parks 93.7 $7.5 to $11.2 Community Parks 306.0 $26.0 to $45.9 Trails & Pathways 91.6 $6.7 to $11.6 ^ (332,508 L.P. $48.8 to $81.6 * The acreage amount shown does not include the 56 -acre community park site and the 6.7 acre Chateau Park site. SOURCE: Landerman-Moore Associates The preparation of master plans for the 56 -acre community park and Chateau Park has provided development cost information. At the time of submittal of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Parks & Recreation System Plan, the development costs for Chateau Park is $785,000 and the development costs for the 56 -acre community park is separated into three phases as follows: Phase 1 $ 1,994,000 Phase 2 $ 4,520,000 Phase 3 $ 3,824,000 This data is included here as a matter of information in regard to the City's current planning activity. 57 4.2 Administration, Operations & Maintenance Costs ... Administrative, operations and maintenance costs are often determined or measured on the basis of per capita ratios of the resident population. However, maintenance costs, that is maintaining park sites, buildings and facilities, may be assigned on the basis of dollars per acre per year. The current (1999) annual per -capita cost for administration, operations and maintenance, using a population figure of 37,735, is -' about $13.50 as identified in the following table. Future per -capita rates will be effected by growth of services, the amount of land to _ be maintained and programs to be operated and or administered. —, Table 4-6 Annual Per -Capita Costs 1999 PROGRAM BUDGET AMOUNT PER -CAPITA RATE Administrative Services $ 294,000 $ 7.79 Recreation Programs & Services 13,000 0.34 Operations & Maintenance 200,000 5.34 Totals $ 507,000 $ 13.47 SOURCE: Parks & Recreation Department, 1999 Budget Future per -capita cost ratios will depend on inflation, growth in services and general economic conditions. Budget implications of -" park administration, operations and maintenance are influenced by the following key factors: 1. Administration and maintenance workload performance standard for routine and preventative service with 6712 recreation program support requirements, including equipment/ facility prep, clean-up and special event activities. 2. Recreation program service standards established as a matter of policy by the City of Meridian as compared to administrative style. 3. Maintenance and operations resource requirements _ based on an adopted level of maintenance service, including permanent and temporary staffing, contracted services, and adequate materials, supplies and equipment to facilitate the level of maintenance service adopted. 4. The number of parks, park acreage, facilities and facility use, program schedules and event attendance levels. Magnitude of costs are also influenced by design, level of facilities developed within a park, climatic conditions, intensity of program services, administrative procedures and status of the maintenance management system. Departmental operating costs have been identified on an annual per capita basis for population levels _ assigned to each planning year objective. The following table is a projection of administration, operations and maintenance costs for 2005, 2010 and beyond. Cost projections include future staffing, inflationary effects and funding levels required to maintain a level of service standard of 6.0 acres per 1,000 residents. 59 Table 4-7 City of Meridian _ Administration, Operations & Maintenance Cost Projections 2005 & 2010 + 2005 2010 FUNCTION (48, 200) (92,500) Administration (4.25) $ 204,850 (5.02) $ 464,350 Operations (17.55) $ 845,910 (20.71) $ 1,915,675 Maintenance (25.28) $ 1,218,496 (29.83) $ 2,759,275 Total (47.08) $ 2,269,256 (55.56) $ 5,139,300 NOTE: The overall increase in per capita cost between the year 2005 and 2010+ is $8.48 which includes park development, inflation and population growth influences. SOURCE: Landerman-Moore Associates If recreation services are to meet its administration, operations and maintenance requirements, the current level of funding and corresponding ratio should be increased. Comparative information from other Pacific Northwest communities indicate a range of per capita cost ratios, which may or may not be at a level sufficient to adequately support the functions of parks and recreation services. The following table indicates the funding level on a per capita basis for selected communities in Idaho and Washington State. 60 Table 4-8 Selected Communities .� Administration and O & M Costs Per Capita Ratio �. MINU IUNII'Y PER -CAPITA Rall' Meridian $13.50 Boise $66.42 Nampa (Not available) Auburn $79.00 Edmonds $57.00 Marysville $53.00 Redmond $94.00 SOURCE. Landernsan-Moore Associates It should be noted that some communities' maintenance costs are separated from administration and operations, and are calculated as to their relative value on the basis of park classifications and cost per acre within each classification. The following are maintenance costs by classification averaged for communities within the Northwest region. Community Parks $8,000 to $10,000 per acre/yr. Neighborhood Parks $7,000 to $9,000 per acre/yr. Trails $5,000 to $6,000 per mile/yr. Maintenance costs indicated may be mitigated due to weather and level of use. However, the costs indicated assume a standard of service that includes preventive maintenance and protection of public parks and recreation facilities. 61 4.3 Maintenance Management As part of the Comprehensive Parks & Recreation System Plan implementation, it is necessary to structure a maintenance management system that is responsive to the level of development that will occur over time. In this regard, there are four (4) key areas of maintenance activity that are considered essential: 1. Developing and maintaining a regular program of routine and preventative maintenance. 2. Organizing a maintenance services program which supports program and use activities support. 3. Participating in capital budget development and reviewing the impacts upon maintenance demand as a result of capital outlay and facility development activity. 4. Performing or coordinating special projects involving new construction, plant facilities or site/ facility modifications, improvements or renovation. Organizational elements of maintenance should be formed to _ address several basic functions. The five (5) functional elements would be organized to report directly to the Park Maintenance Manager who administers maintenance and operations. These elements are: 0 Grounds Maintenance 0 Structures Maintenance .... • Electrical & Mechanical Maintenance • Motor Pool & Equipment Services • Central Warehousing, Tools, Supplies & Equipment 62 Peak recreation use periods or program support workloads should be met by shifting selected staff from regular maintenance activities to recreation program support teams. Specialized program support should be covered by multi -craft support teams drawn from the park operations staff and augmented with temporary or part-time employees. All general support needs should be supplied by operations and maintenance from temporary personnel resources _ where possible. Other factors, which must be identified and structured, are: • The categories of service, responsibilities and procedures for contracting maintenance work through private industry sources. • A facility inventory and record of service activities system. • Maintenance workload schedules should be prepared to determine staffing patterns, staffing levels and equipment, tools and supplies resource requirements by week and month. • An inspection and reporting procedure should be developed for identification and evaluation of key maintenance problems on a semi- - annual basis. • Services performance standards should be developed and implemented _ to monitor results and methods used for maintaining park sites and facilities. • A maintenance budgeting process should be established which focuses on labor, materials and equipment resources required to carry out routine maintenance, to support recreation programs demand, and for specialized maintenance services provided by private contractors. • Formal methods for planning and scheduling maintenance work should be installed. This includes seasonal, weekly and daily scheduling, and scheduling backlog jobs, repairs and remedial maintenance tasks. • A system for recording maintenance services and repairs made to major equipment items and facilities should be developed. 63 • An integrated reporting structure should be developed to provide a basis for work orders, budget information and cost control. • A work order system with documentation methods and a "request for services" authorization process should be established between park operations and recreation services. • An 24-hour emergency work request system should be established to respond to fire, flooding or other emergencies. • A centralized control of special tools and portable equipment with multiple users should be established. • Operating procedures should be established to provide close control for requisition of items stored in warehouse and supply rooms. • A training, skills and safety development program should be established with a certificate procedure linked to employment development and advancement. As these systems and practices are defined and implemented, the specific budget implications of operations and maintenance will become evident. This is due to the fact that fiscal management -' controls and reporting systems are (or should be) designed into each maintenance procedure. The budget implications of park operations and maintenance -' resource requirements are influenced by the following key factors: 1. Maintenance workload performance at a standard of routine and preventative service with recreation program support requirements, including equipment/ facility prep, clean-up and special events activities. 2. The maintenance and senices standards established as a matter of policy as compared to administrative style. '" 64 3. Maintenance and operations resource requirements based on level of services, including permanent and temporary staffing, contracted maintenance services, and materials, supplies and equipment. 4. The level and quality of parks and facility use, program schedules and event attendance levels. The magnitude of park operations costs are influenced by park design, the amount of development within a park, climate conditions, intensity of use, administrative procedures and policy for maintenance practices. Normally, the extent of facilities and amenities provided within mini parks or neighborhood parks is _ substantially greater than for larger community parks. Annual operations and maintenance costs have been identified on the basis of annual cost per acre maintained. Cost projections for maintenance functions, including contract services, are separated into (3) three categories: 1. Salaries & Wages/ Benefits 2. Services & Supplies 3. Equipment When applying the acre/year cost ratio, the estimates are more static, changing only as the acreage size and facility inventory changes. However, a greater impact on cost changes may occur due to additional parkland and increased use of individual parks and the City's overall park system. 65 4.4 Funding Programs The Parks & Recreation Department is currently funded through a number of tax -based sources, user fees and grant programs administered by local, state and federal agencies. It is recommended that financing programs for future development and maintenance of park and recreation facilities be considered within the context of the following policy statement: —' "It is the objective of the City of Meridian to achieve a balance between recreation program service costs and revenue generation in order to enhance the city's financial ability to meet its recreation goals while reducing the burden of tax - based funding for facilities and recreation services. " Such a cost and revenue "balance" may be achieved by establishing funding objectives which require that a portion of revenue be generated from the tax base while the balance of funds are generated through discretionary sources, interlocal agreements, and enterprise opportunities. The City should advance specific financing opportunities within present statutory capability and then combine new funding alternatives it determines appropriate for acquisition, development, operations and maintenance of park and recreation facilities. The following is a brief explanation of funding programs, which the City may seek to employ as administrative actions or, if necessary, establish by ordinance. 66 Concession Contracts - The Department may use concession service agreements for selected categories of recreation programs. Contracts negotiated on a service level, per capita basis, or percentage of gross revenues against a guaranteed minimums should be considered as the need or opportunity becomes apparent. Concession contracts may be multi-year, renewed annually or for a single activity. Audit procedures and strict performance standards should be established as conditions to the agreement. Such contracts may also provide concessionaire participation in site and/or facilities improvements where long-term relationships are to be established between the City and the contractor. User Fees - The fee structure preferred by recreation agencies is a system of individual activity fees. This reflects the common desire to offer certain traditional activities free of any fees or charges while enabling the City to defray facility operating costs and expenses for intensive activities such as league sports. Additionally, there may be entrance fees for "special use" park facilities and entrance fees plus activity fees at other facilities such as sports parks and commercial recreation centers. The actual fee schedule is a function of policy and may be subject to annual review. Adoption of user fee schedules should consider "market values" for recreation services, which have a modifying effect on the amount of user fees charged. User fees do not offset all public costs for parks and recreation and should be considered an offset of some recreation program operations and maintenance expenses. Special Fund for Park & Recreation - Some City governments have approached the public to request their support for parks and recreation through creation of a special or benefit assessment. The funds are exclusively for parkland acquisition and development and serve as the basis for securing property for future construction. This revenue source is normally on-going and assessed annually on an "assessment unit" basis for residential parcels with clearly defined public benefits within specific recreation service areas and for a specified amount. 67 Bond Financing - There are several bonding mechanisms used for parks and recreation. The creation and flow of bond revenues involves a public debt financing requiring legal and/or voter consideration. These funding mechanisms should be considered for use as a function of enterprise activity where public/ private partnership recreation development opportunities are found. General Obligation Bonds - Used for development of public facilities such as in a special area where there are requirements for infrastructure to allow development to progress for public facilities. Revenue Bond Funds - Revenue bonds encompass a broad category of financing mechanisms. For the purposes of project development, revenue bonding procedures may be used based on authorizing statutes or based on leasehold values of land, facilities and operating entities that create a cash flow. Cities also have authority to issue revenue bonds for utility purposes such as water service, sewer service, refuse and storm water drainage. The recommended policy of economic performance by which the Department's enterprise functions can be stated as follows: "The Department will identify and utilize a combination of revenue centers with emphasis on formation of public/private joint ventures, partnerships or concession agreements. Such revenue centers shall be organized to create funds to create a capital trust fund, and to create a revenue share to support qualified public service (non -revenue) programs that are for the well-being -' of the community. " 68 If enterprise activity is instituted, it is recommended that the Department be empowered by the City Council to carry out policies and administrative procedures regarding the creation of new revenue sources including the following: • Land lease/ development agreements with private corporations for the development of family entertainment centers. • Land lease/ development agreements with public and private entities for the development and operations of a special events and entertainment center. • Concession or operating agreements for promotion and administration of festivals, pageants or cultural/ special events. • Land lease/development or co -development agreements for .-. development and operations of a sports complex and sports tournament centers. -- • Land lease/development agreements for community centers, family health and fitness centers, water slide parks, corporation picnic centers, and other forms of joint development projects. • Operating and concession agreements for retail commercial novelty and food sales linked to other seasonal recreation activities. In addition, the following may be considered for potential active or passive projects, which show creativity, partnering and/ or leveraging. The primary focus is on gaining financial leverage, thereby improving the effectiveness of each dollar spent. Joint Development - Public/ private or public/ public partnerships designed to leverage each dollar through the added economics of joint development in areas of acquisition, O & N1, infrastructure development, joint use parking/ drainage, etc. 69 Stewardship - Active maintenance of park and open space areas brings greater value to adjacent development and that development should be willing to contribute to maintaining a portion of the resource. In addition, natural resource land prohibited from development still has an intrinsic value. This value can be paid from bond moneys to an owner, who will in return pass the money through to a steward for maintenance or capital improvement purposes, receiving in return added value to the adjacent property through an improved natural amenity. Joint Use - While not actually joint development, there may be opportunities such as joint use parking from an adjacent public or private facility that will reduce the cost of new facility (parking, surface water retention, etc. Philanthropy - Contributions from private donors provide potential leverage. Easements - Interlocal, rights -or -way, conservation. 4.5 Potential Funding Sources The following paragraphs provide an overview of various funding mechanisms for financing the Comprehensive Parks & Recreation System Plan development program. a. Public Statutory Funding Programs The principal public funding sources applicable to the parks and recreation development program are in the categories of local, state and federal programs. The following identifies the currently enacted statutory funding programs that may be considered for recreation and leisure activities development. The programs cited will apply to a combination of funding requirement or specific project objectives. For example, some funding sources are for the 70 purpose of acquisition only, others are for specific capital improvements; while yet others provide for a combination of acquisition, capital projects and operations and maintenance requirements. • Local Funding Programs: Property Tax Retail Sales Tax Interest Earnings Real Estate Excise Tax Development Impact Fee, Chapter 12, Title 2, City of Meridian Ordinance • State Funding Programs: Idaho Development Impact Fee Act, Title 67, Chapter 82, Idaho Code (.fit the present, there are no other State initiatives or parks and recreation bond funding programs to support recreation at the local level.) • Federal Funding Programs: TEA -21 Surface Transportation Enhancement Activities Program (STP) TEA -21 National Recreational Trails Fund Land & Water Conservation Fund It should be noted that most or all of the public funding sources listed are highly competitive. Participation in the funding programs, administered by federal and state agencies, is dependent upon meeting the criteria of the funding program, including time frames and participation requirements. 71 VA Section 5 Policies & Standards It is generally recognized that preservation of land for recreation purposes has a positive influence on the local economy and quality of life. Parks and recreation assets are of public interest and are perceived to be a significant benefit in social, economic and environmental terms. As urbanization occurs, land for parks and recreation purposes becomes a limited and valuable resource, which must be conserved where possible. In this regard, a mission of the Meridian Parks & Recreation Department is to establish and maintain public policies that address recreation resources within its jurisdiction. In order to facilitate such policies and serve the community recreation needs, the Department must set forth policies which are designed to guide development and administration of park and recreation services. The suggested policies contained in this section are consistent with those typically adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Other suggested policies expand upon existing policies and pertain to various elements contained in the Meridian Comprehensive Parks & Recreation System Plan. 73 5.1 Park & Recreation Policies 5.1a Park Land & Acquisition Policy Pursuant to the Objectives discussed in Section 3, it is the City's intent to: 1. Develop and maintain procedures and priorities for selection, classification and acquisition of parklands and the use of such lands for recreation purposes. All lands designated for recreation purposes shall be suitable for the park classification and recreation activities intended. 2. Develop interlocal agreements for "right -of -use", land transfers, lease, exchange, dedication and surplus or easement land acquisition procedures. Undertake a working relationship with public agencies such as the School District and Water District for acquisition of parkland. 3. Utilize the resources of national, regional and local conservation organizations, corporations, non-profit associations and benevolent entities to identify and acquire environmentally sensitive land, urban wildlife habitat or preservation areas within the City and its urban growth boundary. 5.1b Park & Facility Improvement Policy It is the intent of the City to: 1. Provide for the orderly and comprehensive planning of parklands and recreation resources through design standards, specific site planning and Master Plan procedures. Such procedures should respond to public need and service area requirements for park development, facilities and recreation services. 2. Park design shall conform to local ordinance or recognized state and national standards for access, safety, health and protection of humans and domestic animal species. Park development shall be of high quality and aesthetically pleasing, sensitive to the opportunities or constraints of the natural, physical or architectural environment. 74 3. Encourage and support development of local neighborhood and community-based programs for park improvements, including participation of civic clubs, non-profit organizations, churches, and organized volunteer groups. 4. Provide barrier -free (ADA compliant) access, where readily achievable, by modifying existing facilities or when designing and/ or constructing new recreation facilities and/ or providing recreation services. 5. Provide amenities at recreation and open space facilities such as restrooms, lighting, seating, drinking fountains, trash receptacles, bicycle racks, and shelters wherever possible and appropriate. 5.1c Recreation Programs & Services Policy It is the intent of the City to: 1. Provide recreation programs that are responsive to population age group demographics and growth needs. Provide programs and services which are non -fee and user fee based as appropriate to achieve a balance within a variety of recreational programs and services offered throughout the community. 2. Promote or sponsor community events, family programs and other social activities that serve general and special populations .... of the community in terms of age group and ethnicity, cultural heritage and youth at risk. 3. Develop joint recreation programs and participate in joint recreation services with school districts, law enforcement, social agencies and other community groups and associations, as well as surrounding communities or neighborhoods within the local or sub -regional area. 5.1d Park Operations & Maintenance Policy It is the intent of the City to: 1. Develop and maintain a maintenance/ management schedule that identifies preventative maintenance, remedial maintenance and deferred maintenance programs for parklands and facilities 75 including all structures, site improvements and tool or equipment resources. 2. Establish year -around maintenance service program that protects public property, preserves its value, ensures its intended use, life expectancy, safety, security and appearance. 3. Maintain parkland and facilities in a manner that promotes community pride, exhibits cleanliness and security and reduc,:s public liability. 4. Develop and maintain the appropriate park rules and regulations that serve the continuing need to ensure access, safety, law enforcement, environmental protection, and protection of park sites and recreational resources as public assets. 5. Organize a schedule of maintenance activities that are to be contracted to private industry on a work order and/ or a competitive bid basis. Me Economic Performance & Finance Policy 1. The City will identify and participate in growth impact related public services fees and organize assessment methods such as benefit assessments in order to finance projects that are identified by the public as needed. Both public and private revenue sources will be employed to achieve a balance of equity and cost to the tax payer through increased private participation in recreation service activity through enterprise opportunities. 2. Identify and secure alternative funding programs administered by state and federal agencies, which are in the form of grants and loans. 5.1f Support Activities The following are a number of suggested supporting activities that reinforce the basic policies of the City. 76 1. Conserve Open Space Land For Natural, Cultural & Recreation Values: • Coordinate and maintain procedures for conservation of open space through mechanisms such as zoning, donation, purchase of easements, management strategies, or establishment of resource .. conservation and recreation authorities. • Where appropriate for recreation purposes, transfer derelict land, easements, tax delinquent land, surplus roadway/highway rights- of-way, and other land not presently in productive use where such land can be used for land exchange, purchase or long-term leases. • Make maximum use of lands associated with public utilities, water supply reservoirs and drainage or irrigation districts to meet �• recreation needs. • Adopt improved regulations for new residential and commercial .. development which require either the dedication of park lands, provision of recreation facilities or payment of fees in -lieu of land to a parks and recreation trust fund. • Work with conservation groups to encourage donations and dedicated lands through equitable incentives. 2. Encourage Joint Use of Existing Physical Resources ^ • Utilize school sites and public buildings for recreation and service programs through establishing joint use agreements. • Develop specific agreements and reciprocal no fee policies, which encourage park, use by school groups and school use by recreation user groups of all ages. Assist in providing services required to open up school facilities for recreational purposes after school hours. This will overcome constraints on land availability and joint -use. • Encourage use of local park and recreation facilities for a wider range of human service delivery (i.e., health information, consumer protection, nutrition, seniors, childcare, bookmobiles, playmobiles, etc.). 77 3. Encourage Planning, Development & Full Utilization of Trails as Recreation Facilities. • Plan urban trail systems for maximum pedestrian and bicycle access to new parks as an alternative to automobile access. Also, plan trail systems that link adjoining communities and urban areas leading to rural or natural areas through regional trail linkages. • Develop specific plans for trails to be used as guides in creating coordinated recreation and transportation systems for pedestrian and all non -motorized vehicles or forms of transportation. 4. Provide Appropriate & Responsive Recreation Services through Specific Planning. • Coordinate recreation planning with other human services planning, including schools and law enforcement; coordinate park and facility planning with land use planning in the City, within sphere areas and surrounding communities or neighborhoods. • Provide for the needs of special populations including those who are economically disadvantaged, physically handicapped and developmentally disabled in park facility planning, design and program services. • Participate in federal and state bonds and grants programs to ensure that the City is taking full advantage of all appropriate local and non -local sources of financial assistance. • Conduct a demographics analysis and citizen/ user groups' participation and recreation preference surveys every 3-5 years to determine and/or adjust recreation needs data. • Encourage ongoing commuruity input into the development and -- management of park facilities, programs and services through community and user group forums facilitated by the Parks & Recreation Department. • Promote environmental education through nature walks, environmental education programs and environmental improvement programs sponsored by the City and local 9:l educational institutions and non-profit organizations participating in environmental awareness. • Promote historical and cultural education through special event programs, the preservation of historical sites and promotion of pageants, festivals and events that extol and promote the cultural and historical heritage of the City of Meridian. 5.2 Park & Recreation Standards The intent of parks and recreation standards is to aid in identifying facility requirements and the organization of recreation resources in _ a manner which is be responsive to public needs, and creates quality recreational experiences. Parks Classifications The classification of parks that respond to the various recreation needs of the City of Meridian are discussed in Section 2 and are repeated here to provide emphasis of policies related to parks development. 1. Neighborhood Parks 2. Community Parks 3. Trails & Pathways 4. Special Use Parks Each classification has certain site design guidelines, which are described in the following text. Illustrations of park classifications are conceptual models, which establish a framework of planning activity and to guide decisions regarding development objectives. Several factors must be considered in connection with the classification and planning/design decisions. These are: 79 a. Determination of specific need in neighborhood, service area or community setting where the park is to be located. b. Assess relationship of need, design criteria, service capability and suitability of a specific site to support recreation service needs. c. Examine the probability of school/park relations in terms of site development and facility use for recreation purposes. d. Assess the probability of creating public/ private partnerships in combination with a neighborhood or community park. e. Evaluate operational and maintenance requirements for the park that is being considered for development. 5.2a Park Classification Standard Classification of parks establishes several essential elements for park land requirements based on population ratios and the types of recreational uses and services to be provided. These elements include a) orientation, b) function and c) space, design and service areas. A particular park may be oriented to the needs of a single local neighborhood, a service area, or citywide use. The physical improvements of a park should respond to the preferences or needs of citizens. Space, design and service areas establish early definition of the location of parks, accessibility, service distances to populations and the amenities to be provided. The following describes the park classifications for the City of Meridian, which is modified from the NRPA standards to fit the needs of the community. EM Neighborhood Parks I. Definition Summary: A neighborhood park by size, program and location provides space and recreation activities for the immediate neighborhood in which it is located. It is considered an extension of a neighborhood resident's "out -of -yard" and outdoor use area. 2. Size Objectives: Five (5) acres to Seven (7) acres 3. Service Area Objectives: Generally a one (1) mile radius, but actually defined by collector street patterns, which form the limits of neighborhood or recreation service area. Population served may range from 2,000 and up to 5,000. 4. Location Objectives: Centrally located for equitable pedestrian access within a definable neighborhood service area. Adjoining or adjacent to an elementary, middle school or high -- school, or fire station/ library, if possible. 5. Program Objectives: Compatible with the neighbor -hood setting and park site constraints. Generally including the following, which are determined with public input as to use and activities: a. Parking for ten (10) to twenty (20) spaces. 1) On street is acceptable if negative impact to residential units can be mitigated. On-site parking is preferable as a planning objective. 2) Bike racks with Class II trail connections where possible b. Restrooms 1) Men's restroom with one (2) water closets, one (1) urinal and two (2) lavatories. 2) Women's restroom with two (3) water closets and two (2) lavatories. 3) Utility and minimum park janitorial storage space. c. Tot Lot/ Children's Play Area —' d. Family Fvcnt Group Picnic Facility e. Informal Family Picnic Area with Benches & Tables 81 £ Unstructured Turf Grass Play Area/Play or Practice Field for Children, Young Adults & Families. g. Sport Facilities - Compatible with Neighborhood Setting & Park Site Constraints. 1) Basketball: half court, full court or tri -court configuration 2) Volleyball area 3) Softball field/soccer practice or game overlay 4) Other features as needs or site conditions allow • Orientation: .._ Serves all age groups with an emphasis on youth and families in neighborhood settings. • Function: To provide a combination of active recreation and passive activities, both outdoor and indoor facilities, and special features r as required or needed. • Space, Design & Service Area: A minimum size of 5.0 to 7.0+ acres with amenities, which include sports facilities, picnic, swim, cultural activities, arts, crafts and individual passive activities. The park should serve a neighborhood population of 2,000 up to 5,000. Distance of the resident from the park will depend on urban development patterns and circulation patterns. Community Parks 1. Definition Summary: A Community Park by size, program —. and location provides space and recreation activities for a defined service area, the entire City or significant geographic segment of the City's population. 2. Size Objectives: Usually more than 15 acres. I Service Area Objectives: Generally a 2 to 5 mile radius within the City and adjacent neighborhoods outside of City limits. 4. Location Objectives: Centrally located if planned to serve a particular geographic segment of the City. Located adjoining or immediately adjacent to a collector street providing community wide vehicular access reducing neighborhood traffic impacts. Connected with Class II on -street and/or off-street community —. trail and bike lane system. Adjoining or adjacent to an elementary, middle or high school if possible. 5. Program Objectives: Elements that fulfill the service area park facilities and recreation program demands. Compatible with the community setting and park site constraints. Generally may include the following facilities: a. Off-street parking calculated to satisfy demand of park and recreation activities provided. Includes bike racks and public transit station at the site and both on-site and street parking. b. Restrooms 1) Accommodating level of park and recreation activities provided and number of people served. Restrooms should be located within 500 L.F. of each other. c. Community Recreation Center d. Park Maintenance & Equipment Storage Building e. Tot Lot/Children's Play Area f. Group Picnic Shelters g. Family Picnic Facilities h. Sport/ recreation facility fulfilling the overall City demand. Appropriate program elements include: 1) Community Pool/ Water Feature 2) Soccer Fields 3) Softball, Little League Baseball, ,Junior Pony League Baseball 4) Football 5) Roller Hockey/ Skate Board Area 6) Tennis courts 7) Basketball courts 8) Amphitheater/ Performing Arts 9) Volleyball (indoor and outdoor) 10) Jogging Trails 11) Other facilities as desirable and park site plan permissible 12) Concessions (Food and Beverage) • Orientation: Multi-purpose service area or community -wide recreation resource serving the needs of most or all of the population. • Function: .. Provides opportunities for indoor and outdoor recreation of a diverse mix of uses and experiences including walking and bicycling trails, amphitheaters, sports, swimming, passive areas and special use areas. • Space, Design & Service Area: The minimum space for a community park is over 15 acres in size. The facilities may provide for some sports activities, however, an emphasis is on passive cultural and community centers with recreational programming and organized activities. The community park may serve populations within a 3 to 5 mile radius. Special Use Parks 1. Definition Summary: A Special Use Park is often considered a revenue generating enterprise created to satisfy the demand for a particular sport, recreational or special event. The Special Use Park may be a public developed and administrated facility but is most likely operated by private sector with local agency participation. 2. Size Objective: Actual size is determined by market demand and special uses or recreation programs being facilitated to serve market and program production needs. EY! Illustration 5-1 Neighborhood Park Classification Model "^ Neighborhood Parks remain the fundamental element of the park system, serving as the recreational and social focus of the neighborhood. Neighborhood Parks are developed for recreational activities for those living within the immediate area. Successful park design accommodates a wide range of age groups and creates a sense of place by fusing the site's unique character with the surrounding neighborhood. _ Typical Neighborhood Park Elements Active Uses Passive Uses ... • Multipurpose • Wading Pools • Individual/Group Ballfields • Handball Courts Picnic Area • Basketball Courts • Horseshoe Pits • Trails ... • Tennis Courts • Shuffleboard Courts • Open Spaces/Fields • Playgrounds • Ice Skating Areas • Gardens • Open Play Areas • Activities Center • Seating Areas/ • Volleyball Courts • Skate Courts Pavilion (beginner) ._ Development Cost Range: $80,000 - $120,000 per acre Annual Maintenance Cost Range: $5,000 - $7,000 per acre Illustration 5-2 Community Park Classification Model Community Parks serve the recreational needs of several neighborhoods or large areas of the municipality — within a 0.5 to 3.0 mile radius, as well as preserving open spaces and unique — landscapes. Community Parks accommodate group activities and other activities not found — nor perhaps wanted- in smaller parks. Community Parks are developed for both passive and active uses. Typical Community Park Elements Active Uses Passive Uses • Ballfields • Swnnrrung Beaches • Individual/Group • Basketball Courts • Archery Ranges Picnic Area • Handball Courts • Tennis Courts • Trails ... • Horseshoe Pits • Playgrounds • Open Spaces/Fields • Shuffleboard Courts • Gardens • Open Spaces/Fields • Ice Skating Rinks • Cultural Activities • Swimming Pools Facilities • Volleyball Courts • Seating Areas/ Pavilions • Nature Study Areas Development Cost Range: $85,000 - $150,000 per acre Annual Maintenance Cost Range: $5,000 - $10,000 per acre Illustration 5-3 Special Use Park Classification Model 0 r- Special Use Parks cover a wide range of parks and recreation facilities oriented toward single purpose use. Special Use Parks generally fall into three categories: (1) historic/ cultural/ social sites; (2) recreation facilities; (3) outdoor recreation facilities. Typical Special Use Park Elements Historic/Cultural/ Outdoor Social Sites Recreation Facilities Recreation Facilities • Performing Arts • Community Centers • Tennis Centers ... Parks • Senior Centers • Softball/Baseball • Arboretums • Theaters Complexes • Gardens • Hockey Arenas • Sports Stadiums ._ • Indoor Theaters • Marinas • Amphitheaters • Golf Courses • Churches • Aquatic Parks • Historic Downtown Areas Development Cost Range: varies, depending on program Annual Maintenance Cost Range: varies, depending on program Illustration 5-4 Suggested Outdoor Facility Development Standards Activity Format Recommended Size and Recommended Dimensions Recommended Orientation Services Radius and Location Space Requirements Notes Badminton Singles -17' x 44' 1622 sq. ft. Longaxis north - southDou 1/4 - 1/2 mile. Unusually in school with with 5' unobstructed uc unobstructed area recreation center or church facility. t on both sides. Safe walking or biking or biking access. Basketball 1. Youth 46' - 50' x 84' 50'x 84' Long axis north - south 1/4 - 1/2 mile. Same as badminton. 2. High school 50'x 94 with 5' 2400-3036 sq. ft. 5040-7280 sq. ft. Outdoor courts in 3. Collegiate unobstructed space all 5600-7980 sq. ft. neighborhood/community parks, plus sides. active recreation areas in other parks settings. Handball (3-4 wall) 20'x 40' with a minimum of 800 sq. ft. for 4 -wall, 10' Long axis north - south. Front 15 - 30 min. travel time, 4 -wall usually to rear of 3 -wall court. 1000 sq. ft. for 3 -wall. wall at north end. indoor as part of unlit -purpose Minimum 20' overhead clearance. building. 3-2 all usually in park or school setting. Ice hockey Rink 85' x 200' (Min. 85'x 22,000 sq. ft. including Long axis is north - south if 1/2 - 1 hour travel time. Climate 185') Additional 5000 22,000 sq. ft. including support area. outdoors. important consideration affecting no. support area. of units. Best as part of multipurpose facility. Tennis 36'x 78'. 12ft. Clearance Min. of 7,200 sq. ft. Long axis north - south. 1/4 - 1/2 mile. Best in batteries of 2 on both ends. single court area (2 4. Located in acres per complex). neighborhood/community park or near school site. Volleyball 30'x 60' Minimum of 6' Minimum 4,000 sq. ft. Long axis north - south. 1/2 - 1 mile. clearance on all sides. Baseball 1. Official Baselines - 90' Pitching dist. 60.5' 3.0 - 3.85 A min. Located home plate so pitcher 1/4-1/2 mile. Part of neighborhood Foul lines - min. 320' is not throwing across sun, and complex. Lighted fields part of Center field - 400'+ batter not facing it. Line from home community complex. 2. Little League Baselines -60' 1.2 A min. plate through pitchers mound to run east-northeast. Pitching distance -46' Foul lines - 200' Center field - 200'-250' Field Hockey 180 x 300' with a minimum Minimum 1.5 A Fall season - Long axis 15-30 minutes travel time. Usually of 10' clearance on all northwest or southeast. For part of baseball, football, soccer sides longer periods, north/south complex in community park or adjacent the high school. Football 160'x 360 with a minimum Minimum 1.5 A Same as field hockey. 15 - 30 min. travel time. Same is field of 6' clearance on all hockey. sides. soccer 195' to 225'x 330' to 360' 1.7 - 2.1 A. with 10' minimum Same as field hockey. 1-2 miles. Number of units depends — clearance on all sides. on popularity. Youth popularity. Youth soccer on smaller fields adjacent to fields or neighborhood parks. — Golf -driving range 900' x 690' wide. Add 12' 13.5 A for min. of 25 width each additional tee. tees. Long axis is southwest - 30 minute travel time. Park of golf northeast with golfer driving course complex. As separate unit northeast. may be privately operated. 1/4 mile running track Over-all width - 276' length 4.3 A - 600'. Track width for 8 - Lon axis in sector from north g 15-30 minute travel time. Usuall y part 4 lanes is 32' to south to northwest - of a high school or community park southeast, with finish line at complex in combination with football, — north end. soccer, etc. Softball Baselines - 60' 1.5 - 2.OA Pitching dist. 45' men. Same as baseball in 1.4 - 1/2 mile. Slight difference. May ^ 40' women dimensions for 16". also be used for youth baseball. Fast pitch field radius from plate - 225' Slow pitch - 275' (men) 250' women . Multiple use court 120'x 80' 9,840 sq. ft. Long axis of court with primary 1 - 2 miles, in neighborhood or use north and south. community y parks. — tennis, etc.) Archery range 300' length x minimum 10' Minimum 0.65 A between targets. Roped, Archer facing north + or - 45 30 minutes travel time. Part of a clear area on side of range degrees. regional/metro complex. — minimum 30', clear space behind targets minimum of 90' x 45' with bunker. Golf ^ 1. Par 3 (18 hole) Average length varies -600 50 - 60 A - 2700 yards. Majority of holes on north/south 1/2 - 1 hour travel time. Climate axis important consideration affecting no. of units. Best as part of multipurpose facility. 2. 9 -hole standard Average length 2250 Minimum of 50 A yards. 9 -hole course can accommodate 350 people/day. 3. 18 -hole Average length 6500 Minimum of 110 yds standard yards. 500 - 550 people/day —' Course may be located in community, district of regional/metro park. Swimming Teaching - min. 25 yds x Varies on size of pool None, but care must be taken in 15 to 30 minute travel time. Pools for — pools 45' even depth of 3-4 ft. and amenities, siting life stations in relations to general community use should Usually 1 - 2 A sites. afternoon sun planned for teaching competitive and recreational purpose with enough to Competitive - min. 25m x 16m m. Min. of 25 sq. ft. water surface per swimmer Ration of 2 to 1 deck to water. Beach areas Beach area should have N/A 50 sq. ft. of land and 50 sq.. Ft. of water per user. Turnover rate is 3. There should be a 3 -4 A supporting area per A of beach. N/A accommodate tm and 3m diving boards. Located in community park or school site. 1/2 to 1 hour travel time. Should have a sand bottom with a maximum slope of 5%. Boating areas completely segregated from swimming areas. In regional/metro parks. 3. Service Area Objectives: Community or area -wide and determined by the type of recreation, special events or use activity being facilitated. 4. Location Objectives: Determined by the property opportunity, service area and size objectives. 5. Program Objectives: Special Use Parks require facility programming that is market driven and based on community planning objectives for establishing public/ private partnerships for recreation. The magnitude and type of special use facilities may include: — a. Water Play Park b. Amphitheater c. Festival/ Swap Meet/ Farmers Market d. Sports Complex e. Family Fitness/ Entertainment Center f. Skateboard/ In-line Hockey Park • Orientation: Provides special event attractions and activities to all age groups within a given market/user area for which the special use park is focused. • Function: Special events, fairs, festivals, expositions, symposiums, sports, community gatherings, ethnic/cultural celebrations, plays and numerous other activities which draw spectator and participants to a specific location. • Space, Design & Service area: The minimum size for special parks varies depending on intent of use and programming. Accommodates major parking space, audiences, performance areas and multi -use areas. Serves populations within a 1- hour to V/2 -hour drive zone. Trails & Pathways Trails and pathways vary in purpose, design and use depending on the location of the trail and its linkage to other use areas or destinations. 1. Users: The typical users are pedestrians and bicyclists. Other users of trails or bike lanes and walkways, especially in urban areas, are in-line skaters, skate boarders, people in wheelchairs and others who may have specialized trail or pathway needs. The major distinction of users are commuters as compared to recreational. 2. Accessibility: Multi -use trail systems are designed to be accessible to a predetermined class of users. Access points to and from neighborhoods, to parks, civic centers and roadways are important elements in trail access and design. 3. Types of Trails: Bicycle trails have a set of classifications (Class I, II, III and IV) which determines use and design considerations such as hard surfaces, widths, signage and lane configuration. — Class I Trail: Class I Trails typically connect communities with exclusive rights of _ ways for the principal use of pedestrians and human powered wheeled vehicles. Class I Trails are — physically separated from roads and streets and have their own physical _ corridor of use. Both definitions are applicable. Class II Trail: A Class II Trail is a two way striped bike lane on one side of the road within the paved area of the road for the preferential use of bicyclists. Class II Trail bike lane widths vary from 5'-8' wide. 86 Class IIA Trail: A Class IIA Trail is a one way striped bike lane on both sides of the road with the direction of travel being the same as the motorist. Bike lane width should be 5' minimum. Class III Trail: Class III Bikeways or bike routes occur on public Rights -of -Way and share the roadway with motorized vehicles. Bike routes are established along routes not served by bike paths or bike lanes. Bike routes are established by placing Bike Route Signing along the public street/highway. Class IV Trail: Natural Pedestrian Trails are normally 4'-6' foot wide unpaved trail (boardwalk, crushed rock, wood chips, bark mulch, etc.) designed for low use/impact in natural areas. The trail may be wider if desired. Appendix A List of Workshop Participants City of Meridian Comprehensive Park & Recreation System Plan List of Workshop Participants Workshop No. 1 Workshop No. 2 Workshop No. 3 Glenn Bentley Buffy Jones Phil Barker Tammy De Weerd Bud Bringor Cherri Boles Bob Thurston Reid Ostermeier Fred Reich Shawn Wardle Phil Barker Steve Siddoway Vivian Klein Steve Lawson Bud Bringor Morgan Shepherd Shawn Wardle Meg Roberts Nancy Link Keith Bird Rob Oskolkoff Chris Perry Amber Wardle Dan Bromet Jason Papke Angela Lindig Thomas Torres Jim Laufenberg Tim Heinze Tresha Griffith Ryan Rupp Rick Behymer M.Rudder Meg Roberts Steve Moore Walter Casey Steve Siddoway Bob Corrie -Mayor Norma Stout Kristin Smagula Kristin Smagula Shawn Wardle Debbie Watkins Tammy De Weerd Reed Ostermeier Teresa Lagoski Debbie Walters Nancy Link Norma Wellman Norma Stout Jennifer Lovan-Holloway Lisa Corrie Kathy Webster Teresa Lagoski Dyan Webster Tammy De Weerd Austin Byrne Peggy Gardner Blake R e) Terry Leighton Megan Roberts Tad Holloway Kim Meyers Trace Leighton Lisa Corrie John Herman (sp?) Frank Thompson Kristin Smagula Lome Richards Trace Leighton Appendix B User Groups Questionnaire City of Meridian Comprehensive Park & Recreation System Plan RECREATION QUESTIONNAIRE The City of Meridian is preparing a Comprehensive Park & Recreation System Plan for future Parks & Recreation services. Your input is needed, so we are requesting that you complete this questionnaire and return it to the City Parks & Recreation Department. 1. If you are a member of a league or recreation organization, please print the official name of your organization and described your recreation activity. (name) (activity) 2. Is your league or organization local only, or is it part of a larger regional or national group? Please check the statement best describes your organization. Local organization only Local unit of a Regional Organization Local unit of a National Organization 3. How many members in your local league or organization? 4. How many years has your league or organization existed in the Meridian area? Number of years 5. Which of the following age groups best describes your membership? Please check all that apply. Children 0 - 7 years — Youth 8 - 16 years Young Adults 17 - 21 years Adults 22 - 55 years Older Adults 56 + years All Ages 6. Please check those months in which your group is most active in league or recreation activities. Check the months that apply. January May September February June October March July November April August December 7. What part of the week and times of day are your activities scheduled? Please check all that apply. — AM PM Weekdays Weekends 8. Which of the following best describes activities provided by your organization? Please check one response. a. For individuals g. For groups h. For families i. For the mobility impaired j. For developmentally disabled k. For others (please specify) 9. Of the following facilities, which do you feel would be Most Important, Second Most Important, Third Most Important for your recreation needs? (check those that apply) Second Third Most Most Most Important Important Important _ A. Children's play area ............................. El ❑ ❑ B. Multi-purpose sports fields ................... 11 ❑ ❑ C. Ball diamonds ........................................❑ ❑ ❑ _ D. Basketball courts ................................... ❑ ❑ ❑ E. Tennis courts ...........................................❑ ❑ ❑ F. Picnic areas ............................................❑ ❑ ❑ G. Pool/aquatic centers ........................... ❑ ❑ ❑ H. Recreation centers/gyms....................❑ ❑ ❑ I. Crafts rooms ...........................................❑ ❑ ❑ -- J. Child care centers ................................ 11 ❑ ❑ K. Senior citizens centers .......................... ❑ ❑ ❑ L. Handball courts ..................................... [1 ❑ ❑ M. Open park lands ................................... 11 ❑ ❑ N. Community Center ............................... 11 ❑ ❑ O. Preschool areas .....................................❑ ❑ ❑ _ P. After school room/area ....................... D ❑ ❑ Q. Teen room/area.....................................0 ❑ D R. ................. ......................................... ❑ Ll❑ _ S. Soccer fields ........................................... ❑ ❑ ❑ T. Rollerblade/ skateboard ..................... F1, ❑ ❑ U. Other......................................................... 1 ❑ ❑ Please describe other facilities not listed, which you would use if available: 2 10. Please list the type of parks and recreation facilities, including community centers, which your organization will use if available Please list in order of preference. Facility Name a. b. C. d. 11. Which of the following forms of transportation do you rely on to get to the activities offered by your organization within the City of Meridian ? _ Individual motor vehicle Car or van pool Walk Bicycle Other 12. Please indicate the name and location of any facilities you use that are located outside the City of Meridian. Facility Name Location a. 13. It would be helpful to us if you could tell us something about the trends in your league or organization membership during the past year (1998-99). Has your membership: ( check one response) Grown? _ Stayed about the same size? Reduced in size? 14. If your organization has grown, by what percentage and number do you estimate that your membership grew during 1998? Please state your estimate : % Number 15. How many persons in your household ? 16. In the past six (6) months, have you or any members of your household participated in any recreation activities provided by the City of Meridian? Yes No 17. How often do you or your family members use a park in Meridian? (select one category) Daily Once a week Once a month Every 2 months Every 6 months Once a year Less than once a year 18. How would you normally hear about a City recreation program or activity? (mark all that apply) Quarterly Brochure Friends _ Family School Newspaper Cable Channel Other 19. How would you rate the importance of parks and recreation? (mark one response each for both a and b) VERY MODESTLY NOT SO NOT AT ALL -. IMPORTANT IMPORTANT IMPORTANT IMPORTANT a. To your family b. To the community 20. How would you rate your overall satisfaction with size, location and facilities of City parks? (check one) RATING Very satisfied Somewhat satisfied Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied No opinion Comments: 21. We would like your opinion on park and recreation priorities. Which of the following should the City give priority to: (mark your first three priorities) a. Passive, open play parks b. Sports parks — c. Community recreation center d. Smaller neighborhood parks e. Trails, bicycling and jogging paths f. Special events and festival parks g. Historic and interpretive parks h. Aquatic parks i. Other ( please write in ) 22. Of the following recreational activities, which would you or your family most _ likely participate in? a. Pre-school classes _ b. Elementary age youth c. Teen classes d. Adult classes and activities e. Senior classes f. Family activities g. Open gym activities h. League sports i. Individual sports _ j. Special Events k. Swimming/ aquatics I. Other ( please write in ) Thank You for -your cooperation and assistance City of Meridian Parks e'er Recreation Department 5 Appendix C Workshop Agendas & Notes City of Meridian Comprebensive Park & Recreation System Plan Community Recreation & User Groups Workshop No. 1 A G E N D A FACILITATOR: Landerman-Moore Associates DATE: Thursday, September 23, 1999 TIME: 7PM to 9PM LOCATION: Meridian Old Town Branch Library, 18 Idaho Street, Meridian Note to Participants: (Please read carefully) "- This workshop is designed to identify issues, opportunities and needs regarding parks and recreational services to be provided by the City of Meridian, Parks & Recreation Department. The principal objective is to develop an understanding of public recreation activities and preferences. Your participation is essential in the process of determining the appropriate level of service and preparing a comprehensive plan to develop future parks. The workshop is organized into two (2) groups: Group I - Recreation Activities Needs Group II - Park Land and Facilities Needs Workshop participants will work within their group for two 40 -minute sessions. A group leader will be selected for each group and asked to take notes and help direct the discussion. We sincerely appreciate your participation and input. City of Meridian Parks & Recreation Department Group Assignment GROUP I - RECREATION ACTIVITIES First Session: (40 Minutes) -- A) Take a few moments to discuss the types of recreation activities or programs that occur as provided by the City, schools, churches, private companies or others in the Meridian area. B) Using the general heading of " RECREATION ACTIVITIES " list the types and discuss the relative importance of recreation activities to your community. C) For the remaining time (allow at least 10 minutes) discuss and list other recreation issues, deficiencies and level of service provided in the community. At the close of the first session, the group leader will report the findings of Group I. About 3 minutes will be allowed. Break: A 10 minute break for all participants for refreshments and conversation. Second Session: (30 Minutes) A) By examining the comments of both Groups I & II made during the first session, conduct a round table discussion that focuses on new recreation activities which are needed or desirable. B) Make a list of "NEW RECREATION PROGRAMS & SERVICES" needed. C) Discuss recreation activities with a view toward their level of importance or priority and rank them by low priority and ascending order to activities of high priority using a scale of 0-5. At the close of the second session, the group leader will report the findings to the entire workshop (3-5 minutes). An open workshop discussion will be facilitated by the workshop coordinator for about 10 minutes, then the workshop will be adjourned promptly at 9PM. Group Assignment GROUP II - PARK LAND & FACILITIES First Session: (40 Minutes) A) Using maps and other information provided, discuss your views regarding the location, size, facilities and use of existing parks in Meridian. Carefully review their location, size, and type of park facilities. B) Using your own knowledge of existing park sites, list any deficiencies that may be apparent. List comments so that they may be understood by all participants. Try to maintain a consensus on any park land and facility issues your group identifies. At the close of the first session, the group leader will report the findings to the workshop. (about 3 minutes will be allowed). Break: A 10 minute break for all participants for refreshments and conversation. Second Session: (30 Minutes) A) Based on the findings of the initial work session, review the lists and make any changes or additions that may be appropriate. B) Discuss ideas that group members may have for new parks and improved facilities at existing parks. Make a general list of the suggestions made. C) Discuss ideas for new parks, their general location, size and facility needs related to activities discussed by Group I. The group leader will report the findings of this session. (about 3 - S minutes will be allowed) —' A general discussion will be facilitated by the workshop coordinator for about 10 minutes and then the workshop will adjourn promptly at 9PM. City of Meridian Comprehensive Park & Recreation System Plan Community Recreation & User Groups Workshop No. 1 September 23, 1999 NOTES GROUP I - RECREATION ACTIVITIES The following summarizes notes taken during the workshop: — A. Activities for Meridian Community Park and Chateau Park: — Tennis Restrooms/ Drinking Fountains Teen Park Amphitheater Skateboard Park Botanical/ Flower Gardens Rollerblade Skating Weed/ Bug Control '-' Pathways B. Recreation Activity Deficiencies: Lifetime Sports: Golf Walking Bicycling League Softball (men's/ women's) — Fishing Swimming/ Aquatics Motorized Sports Skiing/ Cross-country Running/ Jogging General Activities: Bird Watching Picnicking Festivals/ Special Sunday School — Events Historical Activities Crafts Pageants Camping Youth Sports: Generally that felt there is sufficient programming provided in the City and area. However, the following — should be considered: Soccer Softball — Wrestling Football C. Other Programs/ Transportation for Seniors & Disabled Horseback Riding Activities: Arts & Music Festival Jogging Gun Laws, Practice & Competition Running/ Marathons Dog Parks Walking Crafts Programs Drivers Education Racquetball Birdwatching Senior Activities Rafting Water Sports Shooting Softball Archery Soccer Water Skiing Motocross Snowboarding Tennis Camping Baseball Picnicking Football Fishing Cross -county/ Track Skiing Pottery Basketball Snowshoe Racing Swimming Gardening ATV/ 4 -Wheel Sports Snowmobileing Karate Classes Boating Golf Wrestling Volleyball Weight -lifting Ice Hockey D. Activity Priorities: (Priority schedule 0 to 5, where 5 is the highest) Priority 5 Teen Programs Priority 4 Non -sport Youth Activities Interpretive Special Events Historical Musical Festivals Gun Safety Heritage Festivals Archery Fair/ Rodeo Shooting Competition 4-H & FFA Priority 3 Dog Programs Fly Tying/ Casting Music Programs Rock Climbing Craft Classes Radio Control Model Classes Private/ Commercial Recreation Radio Control Competition/ Racing Amusement Programming Bonsai Gardening Kayaking Scuba diving Priority 2 Racquetball Other 2 City of Meridian Comprehensive Park &Kecreation System Plan Community Recreation & User Groups Workshop No. 1 .� September 23, 1999 NOTES GROUP II - PARK LAND & FACILITIES The following summarizes notes taken during the workshop: A. Existing Parks & Facilities: (First Session) • Terrace Lawn, is it a City Park? Why is a cemetery considered a public park? • 8thStreet (tot lot) is very small, out of the way and no nice shade trees. • Tully Park is beautiful with wonderful play areas. • Chateau Park is undeveloped; when will it be developed and what about the tiling of irrigation ditch? • Cherry Lane Golf Course is considered a park? Are there walking paths or other recreation facilities? • Stoney Park - no comments • Generation Park - Nice for people lunching. • 13 Acres between Eagle and Locust south of Overland, Thousand Springs seems suitable for park. • Christmas tree sales lot/ space. • Botanical gardens. General Comments: Some came from towns with parks and recreation facilities, bicycle paths, trees, gardens, community theater, etc. Businesses look to locate in communities with good parks and strong recreation services/ activities for families. 3 B. Park & Recreation Facilities Needs: (First Session) • Water tower at 56 -acre park could be used for recreation purposes, rock climb, outdoor mural, etc. • (2) to Street Park, good for all neighborhoods, need one like it in other areas of City. Need more direction signs indicating parks locations. • Tully Park - needs more benches, tennis courts and is not large enough to function properly for baseball fields. Need facilities for small children. • New Parks - Meridian needs a community center, youth center and/ or a multi- purpose center with rooms for crafts, exercise, classes, dance, games. • Aquatic center with water sports facilities is needed. • Youth center where membership is free to community youth. • Tennis courts for practice and tournament play is needed. (from Tennis Association) • Parks are not connected by paths. Need linkage of park system for better access. Use greenbelt system on irrigation canal system or other means. • Need more common (open space) areas which are required for new development not presently considered. • Fuller Park is over -run with weeds. No facilities for small children. Park needs walking paths, swings, flowers. • Generations Park - needs skateboard park and teen facilities for rollerblade and skateboarding. • Fuller Park - needs indoor facilities, restrooms, play fields, fountains, water features, gazebo, amphitheater, children's theater, rose garden. • There is a general need for meeting and recreation classrooms, after-school facilities and preteen club facility for recreation. C. General Comments: • New parks need to be larger (community park) in size, at least the size of Tully Park. • Locate (separate) throughout the City, different activities (facilities) for different areas such as tennis, swimming, league sports, etc. • A community recreation center with indoor/ outdoor recreation facilities walking paths and flower gardens is needed. • Important that facilities for recreation activities consider the following: League Sports Running Music Youth Human Health/ Fitness Passive Play Senior Citizens M City of Meridian Comprehensive Park & Recreation System Plan Community Recreation & User Groups Workshop No. 2 A G E N D A FACILITATOR: Landerman-Moore Associates DATE: Thursday, October 7, 1999 TIME: 7PM to 9PM LOCATION: Meridian Old Town Branch Library, 18 Idaho Street, Meridian Note to Participants: (Please read carefully) This workshop designed is to identify Park & Recreation needs and services to be provided by the City of Meridian, Parks & Recreation Department. The objective is to develop an understanding of recreation facilities, activities and preferences. Your participation is essential in determining the appropriate level of service and preparing a comprehensive plan for future parks. The workshop is organized into two (2) groups: Group I - Recreation Activities Group II - Park Land & Facilities Workshop participants will work within their group for two 40 -minute sessions. A group leader will be selected for each group and asked to take notes and help direct the discussion and report on findings. We sincerely appreciate your participation and input. City of Meridian Parks & Recreation Department Workshop No. 2 Group Assignment GROUP I - RECREATION ACTIVITIES First Session: (40 Minutes) A) Take a few moments to review recreation activities or programs that were identified in Workshop No. 1. B) Using the demographic information provided, identify the probability of participation in recreation activities. C) For the remaining time (allow at least 10 minutes) make any adjustments to the list of recreation activities that may be provided by or through the City Parks & Recreation Department. At the close of the first session, the group leader will report the findings of Group I. About 3 minutes will be allowed. Break: A 10 -minute break for all participants for refreshments and conversation. Second Session: (30 Minutes) A) By examining the comments of Group II regarding park facilities, conduct a roundtable discussion that focuses on priorities in terms of recreation program needs. B) Make a priority list of "RECREATION PROGRAMS & SERVICES" to be considered by the City. C) Discuss recreation activities with a view toward where, within the City, they should be provided or occur. At the close of the second session, the group leader will report the findings to the entire workshop (3-5 minutes). An open workshop discussion will be facilitated by the workshop coordinator for about 10 minutes, then the workshop will be adjourned promptly at 9PM. Workshop No. 2 Group Assignment GROUP II - PARK LAND & FACILITIES First Session: (40 Minutes) A) Using maps and technical "level of service" information provided, discuss your views regarding what foundation level of service the City should consider providing. Carefully review their location, size, and type of park facilities. B) List comments so that they may be understood by all participants. Try to develop a consensus on level of service by reviewing park classifications and facility issues. At the close of the first session, the group leader will report the findings to the workshop. (about 3 minutes will be allowed). Break: A 10 -minute break for all participants for refreshments and conversation. Second Session: (30 Minutes) A) Based on the findings of Group I and your initial work session, review the level of service and park classifications information and make any changes or additions that may be appropriate. B) Discuss ideas regarding the classification, size and location for new parks. Make suggestions to improve facilities at existing parks. Make a general list of the suggestions made. ' C) Discuss ideas for new parks, their general location, and possible linkage by walking and bike paths, trails or other means. The group leader will report the findings of this session. (about 3 - 5 minutes will be allowed) A general discussion will be facilitated by the workshop coordinator for about 10 minutes and then the workshop will adjourn promptly at 9PM. City of Meridian Comprehensive Park & Recreation System Plan Community Recreation & User Groups Workshop No. 2 October 7, 1999 NOTES GROUP I - RECREATION ACTIVITIES GROUP II - PARK LAND & FACILITIES The following summarizes notes taken during the workshop: Community Gardens Tennis Courts Walking Trails/ Bike Trails Open Spaces City set aside land for parks (other ? ) Poor planning of parks Sound barrier at Tully behind playground Involve neighbors in design of Parks Neighborhood Parks 5-15 acres Community Parks 15+ Open space between Tully and Chateau(?) (north of) 56 acre -Amphitheater -City Leagues -Greenbelt -Tennis Courts -Volleyball -Ann Morrison (sp?) Park ? Golf Course -Open Space 1. We have 5% of needed "Poor Service" 2. Acquire more land and be able to develop 3. We need big parks plus small 5+ acre neighborhood parks and special use parks. 4. Locations: NE of Chateau Park, south of Freeway, NW corner, basically around the perimeter as it exists now 5. Two issues: 1) Already behind in existing neighborhoods 2) Have forethought in the development to come 6. Neighborhood: open land designed for multi-purpose, picnic area, playground equipment, backstops, walking path, tennis courts, linking (?) parks with bike/ walking paths, skateboard parks, basketball courts 7. Special Parks: High level skating parks, swimming pools wants Neighborhood Parks: How can we link them? Naturally on the canals! open land, picnic areas - shelter backstops, walking paths, trees, benches, water, features, barbecue Community Parks: Basketball Ball fields Volleyball Tennis Courts Skateboard Swimming Pool Soccer Botanical Garden Picnic Areas Trees _ Benches Restrooms A Community Center for classes and meetings Type and parks needed Teen programs - a teen center for teens to hang out Handicapped accessible parks 7-12 Youth Football need. 575 kids 100-200 kids skateboarding Bike paths or greenbelt Parks for dogs Aquatic center Senior citizens 1) Transportation 2) Socializing 2 Senior Citizens different types of days * Age 19-50 focus on greenbelt; walkways are important * Amphitheater needs to get a program set up, to see activity Youth - music different activities beside athletic Generations Plaza Age 19 - 50 A. City Leagues B. Amphitheater C. Greenbelt 1. Teen Programs A. Skateboard park B. BMX 2. Adult Programs A. Passive/ Physical 3. Senior Activities Camp for year -a -round ? Interest - < Teens > 3 City of Meridian Comprehensive Park & Recreation System Plan Community Recreation & User Groups Workshop No. 3 A G E N D A FACILITATOR: Landerman-Moore Associates DATE: Thursday, October 21, 1999 TIME: 7PM to 9PM LOCATION: Meridian Old Town Branch Library, 18 Idaho Street, Meridian Note to Participants: (Please read carefully) This is the third public workshop designed to establish Park & Recreation needs and services to be provided by the City of Meridian, Parks & Recreation Department. The objective of this workshop is to finalize public input regarding recreation facilities and services. Your participation is essential in preparing a comprehensive plan for future parks and recreation activities. The workshop is organized into two (2) groups: Group I - Recreation Activities Group II - Park Land & Facilities Workshop participants will work within their group for two 40 -minute sessions. A group leader will be selected for each group and asked to take notes and help direct the discussion and report on findings. We sincerely appreciate your participation and input. City of Meridian Parks & Recreation Department Group Assignment GROUP I - RECREATION ACTIVITIES First Session: (40 Minutes) A) Using the list of recreation programs provided, review recreation activities or programs identified in Workshop No. 2 and make any appropriate changes or additions. B) Using the demographic information provided, discuss and create two lists of participation rates in terms of: 1) Services to be provided by the City of Meridian and, 2) Services to be provided by "others" At the close of the first session, the group leader will report the findings of Group I. About 3 minutes will be allowed. Break: A 10 -minute break for all participants for refreshments and conversation. Second Session: (30 Minutes) A) Identify, discuss and make a list of recreation activities that would be provided on the basis of a user fee or program changes. B) Make a list of "RECREATION PROGRAMS & SERVICES" to be provided by the City that are free of user fees or charges. C) Evaluate and make recommendations as to where, and in what season of the year, recreation activities and services should be provided. At the close of the second session, the group leader will report the findings to the entire workshop (3-5 minutes). An open workshop discussion will be facilitated by the workshop coordinator for about 10 minutes, then the workshop will be adjourned promptly at 9PM. Group Assignment GROUP II - PARK LAND & FACILITIES First Session: (40 Minutes) A) Using maps, acreage requirements and parks classification information provided, discuss the general location, size, and type of park facilities that will be needed. B) Form a consensus on the facilities that should be developed by reviewing park models and facilities information provided. At the close of the first session, the group leader will report the findings to the workshop. (about 3 minutes will be allowed). Break: A 10 -minute break for all participants for refreshments and conversation. Second Session: (30 Minutes) A) Use about 15 minutes to finalize your findings developed in the previous session. B) Discuss ideas regarding funding programs for development of new parks. Make suggestions as to public and private partnerships as ..., well as funding priorities for park facilities. The group leader will report the findings of this session. (about 3 - 5 minutes will be allowed) A general discussion will be facilitated by the workshop coordinator for about 10 minutes and then the workshop will adjourn promptly at 9PM. I I I I Appendix D Park Land Acquisition Criteria .. Park Land Acquisition Criteria This criteria is to guide investigations and planning activities regarding the acceptance of dedicated lands or land acquisition for park and recreational purposes. The criteria has a two step process. The first is an initial screening, the second, is a more detailed review. Upon completion of these steps, staff or a committee organized specifically for property acquisition, through purchase or dedication, may make the appropriate findings and recommendations. This same criteria should apply to any lands being considered under an adopted Comprehensive Plan, local ordinance or as a result of Growth Management Act requirements. STEP ONE: Initial Screening CRITERIA PROCEDURE 1. Site Location Examine site location in reference to the service area, surrounding land uses, zoning, jurisdiction and geographic relationship to population/ growth centers. 2. Site Condition Examine size in relation to park classification, land use requirements and conditions on site, soil structure, topography, natural features, vegetation, structures, etc. 3. Accessibility Examine vehicular and people access to the site, condition of roadways, and how traffic generated may conflict with neighborhoods or with ease of access within service area. 4. Infrastructure Status Examine availability of water, sewer, power and status of storm drains, and other public works systems in relationship to location and intended -- use of site. 5. Comprehensive Plan/ Review the site and intended use in relation _ Zoning Compatibility to the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning & Recreation Element of the Comprehensive Plan or Growth Management. 6. Economic Value Examine land costs and the relative value for comparable properties in relation to acquisition ... and development. 7. Conservation/ Examine unique or important features which -- Resource Value may indicate resource preservation or interpretive opportunities for wildlife habitat, natural environment, historic, cultural or view qualities. STEP TWO: Park Site Selection Review Following the initial screening, additional criteria along with the required maps, data and forms should enable a selection committee to make a -- determination of recommendation, acceptance or rejection of land being dedicated or acquired. YES NO 1. Will the site support the perceived park uses, or programs or services activities? 2. Is the site's location convenient for access by the majority of intended users? .... 3. Is the site the right size and shape to accommodate physical development requirements? 4. Is the topography conducive to desired site development in terms of net usable space? 5. Is the general surrounding, physical and natural environment aesthetically pleasing? YES NO _ 6. Is the site safe relative to high tension wires, noxious odors, traffic, and proximity to other potentially non -compatible land uses? 7. Is there severe air pollution potential from manufacturing or other sources? 8. Is the site free of industrial and traffic noise generated in the air or from surface activity? 9. Does the land drain properly and are general soil conditions acceptable for site and facility improvements? 10. Does the site have desirable trees and other natural vegetation? 11. Is potable water available? 12. Is the site near other community services: library, schools, museum, fire station or police station? -' 13. Is there a relationship of the site to existing parks, trails, conservation areas or educational facilities? 14. How is surrounding land zoned - will development of the park enhance surrounding land uses? 15. Are utility services available (water, sewer gas, electric)? 16. Is the site readily accessible by public service agencies such as police and fire department? 17. Is the site easily accessible for any type of vehicles? _ 18. Is acquisition cost affordable and in line with comparative land values? _ 19. Can the land be shared with other community facilities and/ or organizations for recreation purposes? YES NO 20. Is the site expandable for the future needs through acquisition of adjacent properties? 21. Is the site suitable for enterprise or public/ private partnership development? NOTE: If any response is "No", there should be a critical examination as to the justification of accepting the land, if being dedicated, or acquiring the land. The site selection team or committee should be unanimous in its findings and recommendations before any action is taken. i ., Appendix E Key Person Interviews: Groups, Participants & Summary Responses to Questions City of Meridian Comprehensive Parr & Recreation System Plan Key Person Interviews Groups & Participants List The following identifies the 25 participants and the group to which they were assigned. r Group 1 Ms. Donna Jones Group 2 John W. Homan . , Mark Suderman Terry Leighton Tom Salove Jim Johnson Group 3 Kristin Lundgren _ Corby Goade Group 4 Todd Grande Bill Wallace Group 5 Robert Corrie _ Tom Kuntz Group 6 David Moe Group 7 (no participants) Group 8 Jodi Wind Summer Gold Ed Fong "- Group 9 James Closson Chad Vaughn Patty Taylor _ Greg Steele Michell Bird Group 10 Ken Maddox Daven Newman Cherie McCandless "' Keith Bird Appendix E City of Meridian _ Comprehensive Park & Recreation System Plan Key Person Interviews Summary Responses to Questions I . What, in your view, are the types of recreation programs of greatest benefit to the people of Meridian? Why? -- Group 1: Trails, pathways, picnic shelters, restrooms Group 2: Youth and children's open play fields, adult sports, youth sports, year- ` around programs, opportunities for learning social and competitive skills. Group 3: Recreation activities that keep people active, include all ages and interest groups and bring people together. Group 4: Youth sports and recreation programs for all ages. Group 5: Adult and family activities, outdoor recreation and places to build relationships. Group 6: Team sports needed by families moving to area. Group 7: (no participants) Group 8: Adult and youth leagues, arts and crafts, fine arts classes, music, parenting and family activities. Group 9: Recreation programs for youth, adults; people of all ages and ethnic groups. Emphasis on sports, programs for children and equitable costs. Group 10: Youth sports, adult softball, adult volleyball, basketball; ; summer as well as year around youth activities; also, recreation programs for young adults. 2. What is your perspective on the growth and the need for parks? Group 1: Large population growth, parks essential, programs for all ages. Group 2: Strong growth has outpaced parks and recreation. Deficiency is extreme and City should develop parks. Group 3: Growth rate phenomenal, park needs will continue to increase and are important. Group 4: More land for recreation should be developed along with subdivisions. Parkland should be designated not just open space. Group 5: Park facilities and open space essential, need to pursue space (land) for parks and recreation, also opens pace lands. Group 6: Population growth, not enough parkland acquired. Group 7: (no participants) 0 Appendix E Group 8: Need to know park locations, need more parks, great need for updating and maintaining existing parks. Group 9: Meridian behind population and growth. Overall deficiency is very evident. -' Group 10: Parks provide place for families, we need additional parks and growth is far ahead of existing parks. We need to improve what we have first. 3. What is your perspective on the need for recreation programs? Group 1: Youth sports, swim, open play, recreation classes, dance and theater. — Group 2: Need indoor programs, provide joint programs and publicize existing programs, need programs for families. Volunteer organizations do a great job of organizing and managing recreation programs. City personnel do not need to run traditional youth sports activities. Group 3: More and better organized and managed programs. — Group 4: Recreation centers to assist in development of children and more programs for youth. — Group 5: Youth recreation is number one, a survey should be done later. Group 6: Indoor activities along with other outside activities. Group 7: (no participants) Group 8: Scholarships, year around programs that are affordable and programs that are in a Recreation Center. — Group 9: Adult programs, after school programs for kids and evening hours programs for adult and youth. Pet training and educational programs for families and pets important. — Group 10: Utmost importance, private service providers should be included. 4. What are your feelings regarding the adequacy of existing parks, their locations, — conditions, size and suitability? Group 1: More parks needed throughout City, especially downtown. _. Group 2: Very inadequate and high deficiency of parks. Facilities are important. Meridian must take a proactive approach to developing Parks and Recreation. Group 3: Inadequate, need sports complex, local neighborhood parks with open play, playgrounds and community park. — Group 4: We need more parks!. Group 5: There are deficiencies and we need more land now especially on south side Of City. '- Group 6: Not enough; parks needed in south and west areas. Group 7: (no participants) — Group 8: Swimming pool, open play fields, parks located close to neighborhoods, insufficient parking at parks. I Appendix E Group 9: All areas deficient. Need more tennis courts and to improve facilities at existing parks. All parks should support several types of recreation. Group 10: Deficiencies in all areas, need to develop land owned by City, develop pocket parks in subdivisions and recognize that there are simply not _ enough parks. 5. How do you feel about the current level of recreation services in Meridian? — Group 1: Needs to be greatly improved. Group 2: Recreation services need to be increased, many opportunities if parks were _ available, need to use schools more for recreation programs. Group 3: More recreation services for youth and teens who do not participate in traditional sports programs. '- Group 4: Needs to be increased. Group 5: Current level low, but need based on level of support. There are a — number of private recreation facilities which are used and helpful. Need more public recreation/parks. Group 6: Try to raise the level to at least 50% to 75% ofNRPA standard. Group 7: (no participants) Group 8: Not adequate compared to population and growth. Must require parks in _ new subdivisions. More parks for children. Group 9: Very poor, deficient in several areas of recreation and special need for tennis courts. Group 10: Inadequate services, limited facilities, however, there are some services, if you look around, current conditions as to services, may be fair, but are improving. 6. Are there any special needs or conditions for recreation facilities and programs that should be addressed? Group 1: Handicapped access, seniors need to be involvedd participate. Group 2: Young families, seniors, baseball, soccer and youth sports facilities more recreation programs for all ages. Group 3: Meridian needs year around recreation and conform to needs and access requirements of all people. Group 4: After school programs, youth and senior activities, need more meeting and activity space. "- Group 5: More supervised leisure activities, for youth, seniors, families and youth after school programs. _ Group 6: Boys and Girls Club/ other than sports. Group 7: (no participants) _ Group 8: Handicapped access, Special Olympics, sign language scholarships for children with special needs. E Appendix E Group 9: Senior programs, walking paths and after school programs for kids. Handicapped facilities. Group 10: Boys and Girls Club services should be supported, however, more services are needed, there is not enough. 7. How do you feel about the City developing public partnerships to expand — recreation services? Group 1: Yes, it should be pursued. — Group 2: Good approach, schools, other cities and organizations where responsibilities are shared but needs to be formalized. Group 3: Well defined and managed programs are beneficial. — Group 4: It is critical; should be done to achieve better results. Group 5: Essential to partner with schools and others. Group 6: Not in favor. Group 7: (no participants) — Group 8: School/parkjoint development, a good concept! Group 9: Very favorable, great idea and should be implemented. Group 10: Partnerships are a positive way to improve services, is successful in other — 9: cities but must be fair. — 8. How do you feel about the City developing private partnerships to expand recreation services? — Group 1: Yes, City could benefit. Group 2: In favor of private partnerships, with City control and formalized procedures. — Group 3: Be aware of profit motive, but could be useful, however be sure private entity represents wholesome programs. ,., Group 4: Could help develop Recreation Center with Boys and Girls Clubs, such as facility like Albertson's Park, Boise. Group 5: Need to establish partnerships with private sources. — Group 6: Yes, so long as City has control. Group 7: (no participants) _ Group 8: Yes, great to add to programs, private partnerships a good idea. Group 9: Very favorable, great idea and should be implemented, however, City should maintain control. Group 10: Must be positive for City users, but greatest thing that can be done. 0 Appendix E 9. Should the City look only to the taxpayer to support public recreation, or are there other funding sources that should be considered for Parks and - Recreation? What role should user fees play if any? Group 1: Agree in principle, but other sources need to be explored. - Group 2: Tax based funds, grants and user fees should be used, however, caution Special Events/ should apply to user fees so as not to prevent public participation due to Sports Sports fee rates. - Group 3: Look to any and all sources, but keep user fees under control. Group 4: User fees should be used. - Group 5: Reasonable user fees good to off -set costs. Group 6: Share financial obligations. - Group 7: (no participants) Group 8: No! Private industry participation appropriate, look at resident vs. non- 4.8 Group resident fees for classes. Group 9: Developers should be responsible for providing more parks. User fees are 4.0 4.5 OK but need to be reasonable so as to not exclude people. - Group 10: Taxpayers should not be only source and charged extra fees. Taxpayers 4.0 3.5 should vote on funding programs. People who live outside Meridian 5.5 3.5 should pay extra fees and user fees should be used. 10. Of the following, what are the recreation service priorities in Meridian? Please rank in descending order, the number "l " being the highest. League Sports Trails & Pathways Individual Sports Historical/ Cultural Passive/ Leisure Special Events/ Festivals - League Individual Passive/ Trails & Historical/ Special Events/ Sports Sports Leisure Pathways Cultural Festivals Group 1: 6.0 4.0 5.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 -" Group 2: 1.0 2.6 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.8 Group 3: 2.0 3.0 1.5 4.0 4.5 2.0 Group 4: 1.0 4.0 3.5 3.5 5.5 3.5 Group 5: 4.0 2.0 1.0 4.5 5.5 4.0 Group 6: 3.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 - Group 7: (no participants) Group 8: 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 6.0 Group 9: 2.2 3.8 2.6 4.6 5.0 2.8 - Group 10: 1.25 4.0 4.5 3.5 4.0 3.75 NOTE: Numbers represent Group averages which may differ from Recreation Category averages. 0 Appendix E Are there specific areas of the City that you feel are currently under served when compared to other areas? Group 1: Downtown area - desperate need for transportation. Group 2: South offreeway, downtown and west of town center. Group 3: South of Freeway and Northwest area. _ Group 4: Follow schools in development program. Group 5: South offreeway. — Group 6: South of Freeway, Southeast and Southwest areas. Group 7: (no participants) Group 8: Central core area, south of freeway, downtown and in neighborhoods older than five (S) years. — Group 9: City Center, downtown, old town and south area. Group 10: South of Freeway, Old town, North West Areas. 12. Is there a need for a Community Recreation Center? How about a sports tournament complex, aquatic center or other major recreation facilities in Meridian? What are the benefits? Group 1: Yes! Community Recreation and Aquatic Center. Group 2: Yes there is a need. CRC could be utilized and there are major benefits too the people. Group 3: Yes, applied to CRC, STC and AC. Group 4: Yes! Recreation Center and Sports Complex. Group 5: Yes! Very necessary. Group 6: No need for Recreation Center; Aquatic Center possible. Group 7: (no participants) Group 8: Yes! We need this now. Group 9: Yes, must be done well and in right location however other parks and recreation programs come first. Group 10: Absolutely! (No! other priorities) Recreation Center my not be possible because it cannot pay for itself and City has no extra money to subsidize it - Yes! but make it affordable. 7 Appendix E 13. What kind of recreation activities do you feel are suitable for privatization or public/ private partnerships? Group 1: Arts, cultural event and aquatic center. Group 2: Recreation Center, Golf Course, Tournament sports Centers, and — wherever possible, however government should protect public interests for parks and recreation. — Group 3: Aquatic Centers and Tournament Sports Complexes. Group 4: Performing Arts Centers and Recreation Centers. Group 5: Indoor skating rinks, rifle ranges, Comm unityRecreationCtr. Group 6: Golf Course. Group 7: (no participants) — Group 8: Public/ Private recreation is great idea however, costs must be affordable for families. — Group 9: Recreation Center (partnership) tennis and other. Group 10: Sport Complexes. — 14. What are your views regarding local partnerships with other public agencies such as school districts for park facilities and recreation programs? — Group 1: No response. Group 2: Partnerships important but must be formalized with schools and other — public agencies. Public partnerships are a necessity now and most likely will be in future. — Group 3: Broaden relationships and effective use of facilities. Group 4: Good concept could be good for City. — Group 5: Yes, City, County, School District, local partnerships. Group 6: Yes! Partnerships with School District and work jointly on land acquisition — for school/park development. Group 7: (no participants) — Group 8: Yes! Schools should be utilized year around and a formal school/park development program implemented. — Group 9: Partnerships are important and can serve people well. Group 10: Yes, school facilities should be used, great idea but somebody needs to — provide leadership ... ... like gov't. Appendix E 15. In your view, how can parks and recreation programs provide opportunities for improving social responsibility and leadership development in your community? Group 1: Use civic organization for parks and recreation functions. Group 2: City parks and recreation programs serve an important role but these — qualities must be taught at home. The City can do more if it develops a parks and recreation system. — Group 3: Teach youth to direct energies in positive physical manner and develop self worth which benefits community. _ Group 4: Mentor kids, provide facilities and programs. Group 5: Programs for youth at risk, outdoor activities and programs involving — families. Group 6: ? is it necessary to keep youth busy. — Group 7: (no participants) Group 8: Instills sense of community, respect, helps provide neighborhood unity and — helps children feel proud of the place they live in. Group 9: They keep kids involved, exposed to many good activities, are busy, _ learning, socializing and developing quality life skills. Group 10: Recreation services are positive for community. _ 16. What are your views regarding the need for nature parks within the City? Group 1: Very much needed...... and educational. Group 2: Nature parks are fine, but no need in City, peoples' needs for traditional recreation must be priority. Group 3: Many nature areas already exist but one might be considered. Group 4: Nature Parks/ Centers are useful and beneficial to community. Group 5: OK but limit amount of area and essential to have a place that is more quiet! Group 6: Very much in favor. Group 7: (no participants) Group 8: Walking paths for exercise, softball fields and soccer fields are OK but we need a park with open play, children's play equipment and lots of trees. Group 9: Yes, it would be nice to have a relaxing park and there will be a need and a benefit. Group 10: A small park after we have sufficient traditional parks. Appendix E 17. How do you think the people of Meridian measure the value of parks and recreation programs in Meridian? How do you measure the value of recreation in Meridian? Group 1: Some feel it is of value, some not, but 1 feel it is of high value and we need more parks and recreation programs in Meridian. Group 2: The newer population value parks and recreation highly but the perception is that the older population (lifetime conservative residents) do not value City parks and recreation as being important or necessary. A condition evidenced by lack of parks and recreation programs in Meridian. Group 3: Valued very highly - but people aren't used to getting involved. Group 4: High value! Needs to be available and accessible. Group 5: Very good value, especially to new community residents. Group 6: Not many people care unless they understand problems (no land no facilities... no problems!). Group 7: (no participants) Group 8: Safety, cleanliness, maintenance, location and cost factors. Group 9: People put a great value on recreation and use of parks. It's definitely important. Group 10: High value on parks and recreation. Exception, statement made by Cherie McCandless: "People I've talked to aren't too concerned about parks or more recreation! ". Comments: Group 1: The seniors' needs must be represented. Group 2: -Youth recreation makes better citizens. *City government must listen to majority who need parks. -City needs to become more involved with and build facilities that support organized sports. Group 3: More recreation programs can and should be offered. Group 4: None Group 5: None Group 6: None Group 7: (no participants) Group 8: Park and Recreation internships at local high school, provide a traveling parks and recreation team. Provide free services and opportunities to use equipment. Keep the family unit together through parks and quality recreation programs. Group 9: City needs to make Parks and Recreation its highest priority. Group 10: None 10