Loading...
Agency Comments~~~~~ .. ...~ ~nJ ~" ~~~~~~~~~~• (/OfwsWt/l~I~~O ~~iLV'6G~i Date: September 18, 2012 To: Linder Church of Christ 1555 N. Linder Road Meridian, ID 83642 Subject: MAZ-12-007 W. Ustick Road Rebecca W. Arnold, President Sara M. Baker, Vice President John S. Franden, Commissioner Carol A. McKee, Commissioner Mitchell A. Jaurena, Commissioner On September 18, 2012 the Ada County Highway District Staff acted on your application for the above referenced project. The attached report lists site-specific requirements, conditions of approval and street improvements, which are required. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (208) 387-6174. Sincerely, ~~ Jarom Wagoner Planner II Development Services Ada County Highway District CC: Project file City of Meridian (sent via email) Shawn Nickel (sent via email) Ada County Highway District • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 208-387-6100 • FX 345-7650 • www.achdidaho.org ~~~~~~ ~~ .. _ . . ~~m~ ~o _S Development Services Department Project/File: MAZ-12-007 This is an annexation and rezone application to annex and rezone 21.82 acres from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to C-C (Community Business) and R-8 (Medium Density Residential). The site is located at W. Ustick Road, approximately'/2 mile west of Black Cat Road in Meridian, Idaho. Lead Agency: City of Meridian Site address: W. Ustick Road Staff Approval: September 18, 2012 Applicant: Linder Church of Christ 1555 N. Linder Road Meridian, ID 83642 Representative: Shawn L. Nickel 1589 N. Estancia Place Eagle, ID 83616 Staff Contact: Jarom Wagoner Phone: 387-6174 E-mail: jwaaonert~achdidaho.org Tech Review: September 18, 2012 A. Finding s of Fact Description of Application: The applicant is proposing to annex and rezone approximately 22 acres. The applicant is proposing to rezone 17.35 acres to C-C (Community Business District) and 4.46 acres to R-8 (Medium Density Residential District). The applicant is proposing to construct a 50,000 square foot church within the C-C zone with future additional office/commercial space and a future multi-family housing complex. The applicant is proposing 13 single-family lots within the R-8 zone. 2 Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area: Direction Land Use Zonin North Rural Urban Transition Zone RUT South Rural Urban Transition Zone RUT East Medium Densit Residential District R-8 West Rural Urban Transition Zone RUT 3. Site History: ACHD has not previously reviewed this site for a development application. 4. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that time. 2 MAZ-12-007 5. Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)/Five Year Work Plan (FYWP): There are currently no roadways, bridges or intersections in the general vicinity of the project that are currently in the Five Year Work Program. • Ustick Road is listed in the Capital Improvements Plan to be widened to 5-lanes from McDermott Road to Black Cat Road between 2022 and 2026. B. Traffic Findings for Consideration 1. Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 456 additional vehicle trips per day (none existing); 28 additional vehicle trips per hour in the PM peak hour (none existing), based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8'h edition. These estimates are for the church use only, since the extent of the commercial and residential aspect is still undetermined. 2. Condition of Area Roadways Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour (VPH) Functional PM Peak PM Peak Existing Roadway Frontage Classification Hour Hour Level Plus ' Traffic Count of Service Pro ect Ustick Road 1,020 Principal 236 Better than Better feet Arterial "D" than "D" * Acceptable level of service for atwo-lane principal arterial is "E" (690 VPH). 3. Average Daily Traffic Count (VDT) Average daily traffic counts are based on ACHD's most current traffic counts. The average daily traffic count for Ustick Road east of McDermott Road was 4,515 on March 17, 2011. C. Findings for Consideration This application is for a rezone application only. Listed below are some of the findings for consideration that the District may identify when it reviews a future development application. The District may add additional findings for consideration when it reviews a specific redevelopment application. 1. Ustick Road a. Existing Conditions: Ustick Road is improved with 2-travel lanes, and no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. There is 50 feet of right-of--way for Ustick Road (25 feet from centerline). b. Policy: Arterial Roadway Policy: District Policy 7205.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for improving all street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is taken to all of the adjacent streets. Master Street Map and Typology Policy: District Policy 7205.5 states that the design of improvements for arterials shall be in accordance with District standards, including the Master Street Map and Livable Streets Design Guide. The developer or engineer should contact the District before starting any design. Street Section and Right-of-Way Width Policy: District Policies 7205.2.1 & 7205.5.2 state that the standard 5-lane street section shall be 72 feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) within 96 feet of right-of-way. This width typically accommodates two travel lanes in each direction, a continuous center left-turn lane, and bike lanes on a minor arterial and a safety shoulder on a principal arterial. 3 MAZ-12-007 Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7205.5.7 requires a concrete sidewalk at least 5-feet wide to be constructed on both sides of all arterial streets. A parkway strip at least 6-feet wide between the back-of--curb and street edge of the sidewalk is required to provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians. Consult the District's planter width policy if trees are to be placed within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next to the back-of-curb shall be a minimum of 7 feet wide. Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway. Meandering sidewalks are discouraged. A permanent right-of-way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right- of-way line and 2 feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located wholly within the public right-of--way or wholly within an easement. ACHD Master Street Map: ACHD Policy Section 3111.1 requires the Master Street Map (MSM) guide the right-of-way acquisition, arterial street requirements, and specific roadway features required through development. This segment of Ustick Road is designated in the MSM as a Residential Arterial with 5-lanes and on-street bike lanes, a 71-foot street section within 96 feet of right-of-way. c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is not proposing any improvements to Ustick Road, abutting the site. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: In accordance with the MSM the applicant should be required to dedicate 48 feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Ustick Road, abutting the site. The applicant should be required to construct a 5-foot wide sidewalk located a minimum of 42 feet from the centerline of Ustick Road (measured to the near edge of sidewalk). The sidewalk should be located either wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within a permanent right-of-way easement. As the site is further developed, depending on the scope of the commercial and residential components, a traffic impact study may be required with future applications. 2. Internal Local Street (Moonlake Drive) a. Existing Conditions: The site has no internal local streets. b. Policy: Local Roadway Policy: District Policy 7207.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for improving all local street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is taken to all of the adjacent streets. Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District Policy 7207.5 states that right-of-way widths for all local streets shall generally not be less than 50-feet wide and that the standard street section shall be 36-feet (back-of--curb to back-of-curb). The District will consider the utilization of a street width less than 36-feet with written fire department approval. Continuation of Streets Policy: District Policy 7207.2.4 states that an existing street, or a street in an approved preliminary plat, which ends at a boundary of a proposed development shall be extended in that development. The extension shall include provisions for continuation of storm drainage facilities. Benefits of connectivity include but are not limited to the following: • Reduces vehicle miles traveled. • Increases pedestrian and bicycle connectivity. • Increases access for emergency services. 4 MAZ-12-007 • Reduces need for additional access points to the arterial street system • Promotes the efficient delivery of services including trash, mail and deliveries. • Promotes appropriate intra-neighborhood traffic circulation to schools, parks, neighborhood commercial centers, transit stops, etc. • Promotes orderly development. Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7207.5.7 states that afive-foot wide concrete sidewalk is required on both sides of all local streets, except those in rural developments with net densities of one dwelling unit per 1.0 acre or less, or in hillside conditions where there is no direct lot frontage, in which case a sidewalk shall be constructed along one side of the street. Some local jurisdictions may require wider sidewalks. The sidewalk may be placed next to the back-of--curb. Where feasible, a parkway strip at least 8 feet wide between the back-of-curb and the street edge of the sidewalk is recommended to provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians and to allow for the planting of trees in accordance with the District's Tree Planting Policy. If no trees are to be planted in the parkway strip, the applicant may submit a request to the District, with justification, to reduce the width of the parkway strip. Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway. Meandering sidewalks are discouraged. A permanent right-of--way easement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of the dedicated right-of--way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right- of-way line and 2 feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within an easement.). Cul-de-sac Streets Policy: District Policy 7207.5.8 requires cul-de-sacs to be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 45 feet; in rural areas or for temporary cul-de-sacs the emergency service providers may require a greater radius. Landscape and parking islands may be constructed in turnarounds if a minimum 29-foot street section is constructed around the island. The pavement width shall be sufficient to allow the turning around of a standard AASHTO SU design vehicle without backing. The developer shall provide written approval from the appropriate fire department for this design element. The District will consider alternatives to the standard cul-de-sac turnaround on a case-by-case basis. This will be based on turning area, drainage, maintenance considerations and the written approval of the agency providing emergency fire service for the area where the development is located. c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing to extend the existing stub street, Moonlake Drive, into the development. Moonlake Drive is proposed to be constructed as a 36-foot street section with rolled curb, gutter, and 5-foot wide sidewalk within 50 feet of right- of-way to match the existing street section. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District Local Roadway Policy and should be approved as proposed. The applicant should be required to construct the cul-de-sac to provide a minimum turning radius of 45 feet. 3. Driveways 3.1 Ustick Road a. Existing Conditions: There are no driveways onto Ustick Road, from the site. 5 MAZ-12-007 b. Policy Access Points Policy: District Policy 7205.4.1 states that all access points associated with development applications shall be determined in accordance with the policies in this section and Section 7202. Access points shall be reviewed only for a development application that is being considered by the lead land use agency. Approved access points may be relocated and/or restricted in the future if the land use intensifies, changes, or the property redevelops. Access Policy: District Policy 7205.4.7 states that direct access to principal arterials is typically prohibited. If a property has frontage on more than one street, access shall be taken from the street having the lesser functional classification. If it is necessary to take access to the higher classified street due to a lack of frontage, the minimum allowable spacing shall be based on Table 1 b under District policy 7205.4.7, unless a waiver for the access point has been approved by the District Commission. Driveways, when approved on a principal arterial shall operate as a right-in/right-out only, and the District will require the construction of a raised median to restrict the left turning movements. Driveway Location Policy: District Policy 7205.4.7 requires driveways located on principal arterial roadways to be located a minimum of 355-feet from the nearest intersection for aright- in/right-out only driveway. Full-access driveways are not allowed on principal arterial roadways. Successive Driveways: District Policy 7205.4.7 Table 1 b, requires driveways located on principal arterial roadways with a speed limit of 50 MPH to align or offset a minimum of 520 feet from any existing or proposed driveway. Driveway Width Policy: District Policy 7205.4.8 restricts high-volume driveways (100 VTD or more) to a maximum width of 36-feet and low-volume driveways (less than 100 VTD) to a maximum width of 30-feet. Curb return type driveways with 30-foot radii will be required for high-volume driveways with 100 VTD or more. Curb return type driveways with 15-foot radii will be required for low-volume driveways with less than 100 VTD. Driveway Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District Policy, 7205.4.8, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30- feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers in accordance with Table 2 under District Policy 7205.4.8. Temporary Access Policy: District Policy 7202.4.2 identifies a temporary access as that which "is permitted for use until appropriate alternative access becomes available". Temporary access may be granted through a development agreement or similar method, and the developer shall be responsible for providing a financial guarantee for the future closure of the driveway. Cross Access Easements/Shared Access Policy: District Policy 7202.4.1 states that cross access utilizes a single vehicular connection that serves two or more adjoining lots or parcels so that the driver does not need to re-enter the public street system. c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct a 40-foot wide driveway onto Ustick Road located approximately 700 feet west of the intersection of Ustick Road and Christian Way (measured centerline-to-centerline). d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal does not meet District Access Management Policy; which requires driveways on principal arterials, when allowed, to operate as right-in/right-out only. Staff recommends a modification of policy to allow the driveway to remain as a temporary full access driveway. This is due to the rural nature of the area, that Ustick Road is a single lane principal arterial (one lane in each direction), and the road has less than 5,000 vehicle trips per day. Additionally, the driveway provides 6 MAZ-12-007 ingress/egress for the commercial traffic from/onto Ustick Road, thus not requiring cross thru traffic with the residential subdivision to the east. Staff recommends that the applicant enter into a development agreement with the District for the future restriction or closure of the driveway. Due to the fact that the CIP listed improvements for Ustick Road are not scheduled to occur until 2022-2026, the applicant should not be required to provide a surety for the future restrictions/closure of the driveway. 3.2 McMurtrey Street a. Existing Conditions: There is a hammerhead driveway at the terminus of McMurtrey Street, abutting the site. b. Policy: Driveway Location Policy: District Policy 7208.4.1 requires driveways located near intersections to be located a minimum of 75-feet (measured centerline-to-centerline) from the nearest street intersection. Successive Driveways: District Policy 7208.4.1 states that successive driveways away from an intersection shall have no minimum spacing requirements for access points along a local street, but the District does encourage shared access points where appropriate. Driveway Width Policy: District Policy 7208.4.3 restricts commercial driveways to a maximum width of 40-feet. Most commercial driveways will be constructed as curb-cut type facilities. Driveway Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District Policy, 7208.4.3, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30 feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway. c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing to extend the driveway off of the McMurtrey Street stub to provide access to the church site. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District Policy and should be approved, as proposed. The applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30 feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway. 4. Tree Planters Tree Planter Policy: Tree Planter Policy: The District's Tree Planter Policy prohibits all trees in planters less than 8-feet in width without the installation of root barriers. Class II trees may be allowed in planters with a minimum width of 8-feet, and Class I and Class III trees may be allowed in planters with a minimum width of 10-feet. 5. Landscaping Landscaping Policy: A license agreement is required for all landscaping proposed within ACHD right-of--way or easement areas. Trees shall be located no closer than 10-feet from all public storm drain facilities. Landscaping should be designed to eliminate site obstructions in the vision triangle at intersections. District Policy 5104.3.1 requires a 40-foot vision triangle and a 3-foot height restriction on all landscaping located at an uncontrolled intersection and a 50-foot offset from stop signs. Landscape plans are required with the submittal of civil plans and must meet all District requirements prior to signature of the final plat and/or approval of the civil plans. 6. Other Access Ustick Road is classified as a principal arterial roadway. Other than the access specifically approved with this application, direct lot access is prohibited to this roadway. 7 MAZ-12-007 D. Site Specific Conditions of Approval This application is for a rezone only. Listed below are site-specific conditions of approval that the District may require when it reviews a future development application for this site. The District may add additional site-specific requirements when it reviews a specific re-development application 1. Dedicate 48 feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Ustick Road, abutting the site. The right-of- way purchase and sale agreement and deed must be completed and signed by the applicant prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits). Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The District will purchase the right-of-way which is in addition to existing right-of-way from available Corridor Preservation Funds. 2. Construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk located a minimum of 42 feet from the centerline of Ustick Road abutting the site (measured centerline to near edge of sidewalk). The sidewalk shall be located either wholly within the public right-of-way or wholly within a public right-of-way easement. 3. Extend the existing stub street of Moonlake Drive into the development and construct Moonlake Drive as a 36-foot street section with rolled curb, gutter, and 5-foot wide sidewalks within 50 feet of right-of--way, as proposed. 4. Construct the cul-de-sac of Moonlake Drive to provide a minimum turning radius of 45 feet. 5. Construct a 40-foot wide driveway onto Ustick Road located approximately 700 feet west of the intersection of Ustick Road and Christian Way, as proposed. Pave the driveway its full width and at least 30 feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway. 6. Construct a 36-foot wide driveway at the terminus of McMurtrey Street, abutting the site. Pave the driveway its full width and at least 30 feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway. 7. Enter into a development agreement with the District for the future restriction/closure of the driveway on Ustick Road located 700 feet west of the intersection of Ustick Road and Christian Way. 8. Other than the access specifically approved with this application, direct lot access is prohibited to Ustick Road. 9. Payment of impacts fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit. 10. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. E. Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACRD right-of-way. 2. Private sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within the ACHD right-of- way. 3. In accordance with District Policy, 7203.3, the applicant may be required to update any existing non-compliant pedestrian improvements abutting the site to meet current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The applicant's en4ineer should provide documentation of ADA compliance to District Development Review staff for review. 4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. g MAZ-12-007 5. A license agreement and compliance with the District's Tree Planter policy is required for all landscaping proposed within ACHD right-of-way or easement areas. 6. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of--way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACRD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 8. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 9. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the ACHD Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Standards unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 10. Construction, use and property development shalt be in conformance with all applicable requirements of ACRD prior to District approval for occupancy. 11. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of ACRD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from ACHD. 12. If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACHD Planning Review will review the site plan and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that time. Any change in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with ACHD Policy and Standard Conditions of Approval in place at that time unless awaiver/variance of the requirements or other legal relief is granted by the ACHD Commission. F. Conclusions of Law 1. The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are satisfied. 2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. G. Attachments 1. Vicinity Map 2. Site Plan 3. Utility Coordinating Council 4. Development Process Checklist 5. Request for Reconsideration Guidelines g MAZ-12-007 10 MAZ-12-007 Vicinity Map Site Plan ~s sir x mcsss~ ~sv~art~ ~ ~ -.~---_. ~~:o:~ air ~®s~a-zarzarv- w a ~ M • ~. ~ w R F ¢r i fi iii iii i ~ ~~ -,` i~ t U O ~ i t i i j i~~ .; r~,, ~~ ti.... ~ ! i i~: ij i J ~ ~ ~ ~ i ii ii. j~ W ~ ~ ~ t jj a ~#f ~ ~~~! ~ ~ ~ '~ ii ~ ~!~ 4~ i~ i T"", ~" ' ~+'" +~~, ~~: r, ~~ 5 ' Y :1y ~• i ,/= ~,- .. ~, r, r .~ i~~;? f ~1~1 3AOtlO NVfltIOW . 11 MAZ-12-007 Ada County Utility Coordinating Council Developer/Local Improvement District Right of Way Improvements Guideline Request Purpose: To develop the necessary avenue for proper notification to utilities of local highway and road improvements, to help the utilities in budgeting and to clarify the already existing process. 1) Notification: Within five (5) working days upon notification of required right of way improvements by Highway entities, developers shall provide written notification to the affected utility owners and the Ada County Utility Coordinating Council (UCC). Notification shall include but not be limited to, project limits, scope of roadway improvements/project, anticipated construction dates, and any portions critical to the right of way improvements and coordination of utilities. 2) Plan Review: The developer shall provide the highway entities and all utility owners with preliminary project plans and schedule a plan review conference. Depending on the scale of utility improvements, a plan review conference may not be necessary, as determined by the utility owners. Conference notification shall also be sent to the UCC. During the review meeting the developer shall notify utilities of the status of right of way/easement acquisition necessary for their project. At the plan review conference each company shall have the right to appeal, adjust and/or negotiate with the developer on its own behalf. Each utility shall provide the developer with a letter of review indicating the costs and time required for relocation of its facilities. Said letter of review is to be provided within thirty calendar days after the date of the plan review conference. 3) Revisions: The developer is responsible to provide utilities with any revisions to preliminary plans. Utilities may request an updated plan review meeting if revisions are made in the preliminary plans which affect the utility relocation requirements. Utilities shall have thirty days after receiving the revisions to review and comment thereon. 4) Final Notification: The developer will provide highway entities, utility owners and the UCC with final notification of its intent to proceed with right of way improvements and include the anticipated date work will commence. This notification shall indicate that the work to be performed shall be pursuant to final approved plans by the highway entity. The developer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting prior to right of way improvements. Utility relocation activity shall be completed within the times established during the preconstruction meeting, unless otherwise agreed upon. Notification to the Ada County UCC can be sent to: 50 S. Cole Rd. Boise 83707, or Visit iducc.com for a-mail notification information. 12 MAZ-12-007 Development Process Checklist Items Completed to Date: ®Submit a development application to a City or to Ada County ®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD ®The ACHD Planning Review Section will receive the development application to review ®The Planning Review Section will do one of the following: ^Send a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific conditions of approval at this time. ®Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. ^Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. Itetna to be c©mal®tad I~ Ncar±lts ^For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" letter: • The applicant should submit one set of engineered plans directly to ACRD for review by the Development Review Section for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements required by ACHD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee assessment.) • The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the right-of- way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts. ^Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval. DID YOU REMEMBER: Construction (Non-Subdivisions) ^ Driveway or Property Approach(s) • Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to ACHD Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval. ^ Working in the ACHD Right-of-Way • Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit Application" to ACRD Construction -Permits along with: a) Traffic Control Plan b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt. Construction (Subdivisions) ^ Sediment & Erosion Submittal • At least one week prior to setting up aPre-Construction Meeting an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plan, done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACHD Construction to be reviewed and approved by the ACHD Stormwater Section. ^ Idaho Power Company • Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being scheduled. ^ Final Approval from Development Services is required prior to scheduling aPre-Con. 13 MAZ-12-007 Request for Appeal of Staff Decision Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the final decision made by the ROW DS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection. Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply and any modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at the hearing. 14 MAZ-12-007 q~ (v a ~x~~a~ ~ ~ Des 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 Phones: Area Code 208 City of Meridian City Clerk's Office 33 E Broadway Avenue Ste 102 Meridian, ID 83642-2619 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 RE: AZ 12-007/Cinder Church of Christ Dear Wade: Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District (NMID) has no comment on the above-referenced application for Annexation and Zoning. All laterals and waste ways must be protected. The District's Sky Pilot Drain courses along the south boundary. The District's easement for the Sky Pilot Drain at this location is a minimum of one-hundred feet (100'), fifty feet (50') each side of the centerline. At the time #his parcel of ground is developed a Land Use Change Application must be filed. NMID must approve all plans dealing with any encroachments within the easement of the District's Sky Pilot Drain. Any and all encroachments must have approved plans and signed License Agreement with NMID before construction starts. Please contact the District directly to verify the width of easement necessary to operate, maintain, and repair the Sky Pilot Drain. All municipal surface drainage must be retained on-site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District (NMID) must review drainage plans. The Developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805. Sincerely, C v~~--.- Andy Madsen Asst. Water Superintendent Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District AM/dbg . PC: File/Office APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS • 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 August 21, 2012 .. DIS RICT CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT Return to: HEALTH Environmental Health Division ^ ACz DEPARTMENT ^ Boise ^ Eagle Rezone # ~ Z ~2 -~ ~ 7 ^ Garden City Conditional Use # ^ Kuna Preliminary /Final /Short Plat %-~' Y~-OQ-P.Y (I~~u ~,I~,Meridian ~~'~ ~~ ^ Star ~1. We have No Objections to this Proposal. ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ waste flow characteristics ^ bedrock from original grade ^ other ^ 6. This office may require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and surface waters. ^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. ^ 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ^ central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage ^ central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water ^ 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality: ^ central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines ^ central water ^ 10. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ 11. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store ^ 13. Infiltration beds for storm water disposal are considered shallow injection wells. An application and fee must be submitted to CDHD. ^ 14. Reviewed By: Date:~~~~~~ Review Sheet 15726-001EH1111 IDAHO TRAFISPORTA'C'ION DEPARTMENT P.O. Box 8Q28 (gas) 334-830© Boise, I~ 83707-202$ itd.idaho.gov August 20, 2012 Machelle Hill Meridian City Clerk's Office 33 East Idaho Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 VIA EMAIL Re: AZ 12-007 Annexation and Zoning, Linder Church of Christ The Idaho Transportation Department has reviewed the referenced annexation and zoning application for the Linder Church of Christ on West Ustick Road. ITD has the following comments: 1) ITD has no objection to the annexation and zoning request. The project does not require access to the State Highway System. If you have any questions, you may contact Matt Ward at 334-8341 or me at 334-8377. Sincerely, / '" ~ Dave Szplett Development Services Manager dave.szplett(c~itd.idaho. og_v