Loading...
Agency Comments.. DIS RICT CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT Return to: HEALTH Environmental Health Division ^ ACz DEPARTMENT ^ Boise ^ Eagle Rezone # ^ Garden City Conditional Use # I ^ Kuna Preliminary /Final /Short Plat ~~ ,o1-f~p~ ~ileridian l~~s~ ~' _Bus~ ~'~,1 ~v~r~~/ ~ ^ star ^ 1. We have No Objections to this Proposal. ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ waste flow characteristics ^ bedrock from original grade ^ other ^ 6. This office may require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and surface waters. ^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. 8. After writte,~r approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ntral sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water The followi plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality: tral sewage ^ ommunity sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines central water ^ 10. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ 11. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store ^ 13. Infiltration beds for storm water disposal are considered shallow injection wells. An application and fee must be submitted to CDHD. ^ 14. Reviewed By: / Dater/~/~ Review Sheet 15726-001EH1111 ~~~~~~~ ~~~ n ~ r~r (/iDttitM~v~~~! ~ ~O S~LNi~ili Date: July 26, 201.2 To: Ronald Van Auker 3084 Lanark Street Meridian, ID 83642 Subject: MAZ-12-003 2950 E. Franklin Road Rebecca W. Amdd, Prudent Sara M. Baker, Vice Pnsicknt John S. Franden, Commoner Card A. McKee, Mitchell A. ]aurena, CommisskxKr On July 26, 2012 the Ada County Highway District Staff acted on your application for the above referenced project. The attached report lists site-specific requirements, conditions of approval and street improvements, which may be required with a future development application. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (208) 387-6178. Sincerely., Mindy WaNace Planning Review Supervisor Development Services Ada County Highway District CC: Project file City of Meridian, Munger Engineering, Ada County Highway Distrkt • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 308-387-6100 • FX 345-7650 • www.ad~daho.ory 1~ _ _ ~~ ~~s CHD ., Com"~aC ~o ~~.~ Development Services Depnrtrnent Project/File: MAZ-12-003 &MCPAM-12-003 This is an annexation, rezone and comprehensive plan amendment application is to annex into the City of Meridian, and rezone the site from residential (RUT) to commercial and industrial (C2 & I-L). This site is located on the northwest corner of Franklin Road and Olson Avenue in Ada County, Idaho. Lead Agency: City of Meridian Site address: 2950 E. Franklin Rd. Staff Approval: July 26, 2012 Applicant: Ronald Van Auker 3084 Lanark St. Meridian, Idaho 83642 Representative: Munger Engineering,lnc. Matt M. Munger 4090 W. State St., Ste 29 - < °°`~`~'° - ~- 9 ~ i ' Boise, Idaho 83703 i ~ rm~ ~ .~ " ' ; ~~~ '~'~. ,~ I ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~~„ Staff Contact: A , Kristy Heller Phone: 387-6171 E-mail: kheller(a~achdidahv.org A. Findings of Fact 1. Description of Application: This is an annexation, rezone and comprehensive plan amendment application is to annex into the City of Meridian, and rezone the site from residential (RUT) to commercial and industrial (C2 & I-L). The site has one single family residence. 2. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Arpa~ Direction Land Use Zoning North Li ht Industrial Olson & Bush Sub I-L South Communit Business C-C East General Retail/Service Commercial & Li ht Industrial C-G & I-L West Rural Urban Transition RUT 3. Site History: ACHD has not previously reviewed this site for a development application. 4. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that time. 5. Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)/Five Year Work Plan (FYWP): There are currently no roadways, bridges or intersections in the general vicinity of the project that are currently in the Five Year Work Plan or the District's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). 1 MAZ-12-003 &MCPAM-12-003 B. Traffic i=indinsts for Consideration 1. Trip Generation (if TIS not requirod): When a future development application is submitted that identifies a proposed use, then the trip generation will be estimated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual in effect at that time. 2. Condition of Area Roadways Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour (VPH) Functional PM Peak PM Peak Existing Plus Roadway Frontage Classification Hour Hour Level Project Traffic Count of Service Franklin Road 300-feet Principal 902 Arterial Olson Avenue 490-feet LOCI nia nia n/a Commercial *Acceptable level of service for efive-lane principal arterial is "E" (1,770 VPH). 3. Average Daily Traffic Count (VDT) Average daNy traffic counts are based on ACHD's moat current traffic counts. The average daily traffic count for Franklin Road west of Eagle Road was 16,745 on 8/1312009. There are no average. daily traffic count for Olson Avenue. C. Findings for Consideration This application is far a rezone only. Listed below are some of the findings for consideration th€~t the District may identify when it reviews a future developmen# application. The District may add additional findings far consideratan when it reviews a specific redeye%pmerrt application. 1. Franklin Road a. .Existing Conditions: Franklin Road is improved with 5-travel lanes, vertical curb, gutter, and 5-foot wide :sidewalks abutting the site. There is 80-feet of right-of--way for Franklin Road (40- feet from centerline). b. Policy: Arterial Roadway Policy: District PoNcy 7205.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for improving all street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access ~ taken to ail of the adjacent streets. Master Street Map and Typology Policy: [3istrict Policy 7205.5 states that the design of improvements for arterials shall be in accordance with District standards, including the Master Street Map and Livable Streets Design Guide. The developer or engineer should canted the District before starting any design. Street Section and Right-of--Way Width: District policies 7205.2.1 8~ 7205.5.1 state that .the standard 5-lane street .section shall be 72-f®et tback-af-curb to back-of-curb) within 96-feet. of right-of-way. This width typically accommodates two travel lanes in each direction, a continuous center left-tum lane, and bike lanes on a minor arterial and a safety shoulder on a pri~ipal arterial. Sidewalk Policy: District policy 7205.5.7 requires a concrete sidewalks at least 5-feet wide ~ be constructed on both sides of afl arterial streets. A parkway strip at least 6-feet wide between the back-ofi-curb and street edge of the sidewalk is requir®d to provkie ir~cr®ased safety and protection of pedestrians. Consult the District's planter width policy if trees are io be placed within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next to the back-of-curb shah be a minimum of 7-feet wide. 2 MAZ-12-003 & MCPAM-12-003 Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be paraibl to the adjacent roadway. Meandering sidewalks are discouraged. A permanent right-of-way ®asement shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed outside of the dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right- of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks sh~t~ either be kx~ted wholly within the public right-of--way or wholly within an easement.). ACHD AAaater Street Map: ACHD Policy Section 3111.1 requires the Master Street Map (MSM) guide the right-of--way acquisition, arterial street requirements, and specific roadway features required through development. This segment of Franklin [load is designated ~ the MSM as a Planned Commercial Arterial with 5-lanes. and an-street b#k® lanes, a 67-foot stre®t section within 93-feet of right-of--way. c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is not proposing any roadway improvements with this annexation and rezone application. d. Staff CommentsiRecommendations: Franklin Road in its current configuration with 64-feet of pavement curb-to-curb contains ail the elements of a Planned Commercbl Arterial roadway; as such, staff does not recommend any improvements or right-of-way dedication as part of this application. If the City of Meridian desires additional amenities within the pedestrian zone, the city should coordinate those requests with the applicant. 2. C31son Avenue. a. Existing Conditions: Olson Avenue is improved with 2-travel lanes, vertical curb, and gutter abutting the site. There is no sidewalk existing abutting the site. There is 58-feet ~ r~ht-0f- wayfor Olson Avenue (29-feet from centerline). b. Policy: Commercial Roadway Policy:. District PoNcy 7208.2.1 states that the developer is responsible far improvir~ all commercial street frontages adjacent to the site regardbss of whether or not access is taken to s,>ll ~ the adjacent streets. Street Section and Right-of--Way Policy: District Policy 7208.5 states that right-of-way widths for new commercial streets shall typically be 50 and 70-feet wide and that the standard street section will vary depending on the need for a center tum lane, bike ones, volumes, percentage of truck traffic, and/or on-street parking. A 40-foot street sectbn (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) will typically accommodate two travel lanes and a center tum larw. Off Site Streets Policy: District Poky 7208.2.3 states that if the proposed devebpment is not served by a public street, the developer shall pave the street or widen the existing pavement to provide a 30 foot. wide (minimum) paved street with 3-foot gravel shoukers from the proposed :development to the public street specified by the District. Wider stro®et widths may be required depending on the magnitude of the development and other factors, incFuding the potential for bicycle, bus and pedestrbn traff~. If the proposed development is served by a paved public road less than 30-feet wtde, the developer shall widen the pavement to a minimum of 30-feet wide or add 3-feet of additional pavement plus 3-foot gravel shoulders to the existing road, whichever is greater. The road shall be widened from the site to -the public street specified by the District. A~ uti6ity rek~tbn costs associated with the-off-sifie street widening shall be borne by the developer. Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7208.5.6 requires a concrete sidewalks at least 5-feet wkie to be constructed on both sides of all commercial streets. A parkway strip at bast 6-feet wide between the back-of--curb and street edge of ttt~ sidewalk is required to provide Increased safety and protection of pedestrians. Consult the District's planter width policy If trees are to be placed within the parkway strip. 3 MAZ-12-003 & MCPAM-12-003 A permanent right-of-way easement shah be provided if public sidewalks ara placed outside of the' dedicated right-of-way. The easement shall encompass the. entire area between the right- of-way line and 2-feet behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks ahaFl either be located wholly within the public right-of--way or wholly within an easement. c. Applicant's Proposal: The a~icant is not proposing any roadway improvements with this annexation and rezone application. d. Staff Commenta/Rscommendations: The applicant's proposal does not meet District policy. Olson Avenue is improved with 2-travel lanes, vertical curb, and gutter abutting the sits. There is no sidewalk existing abutting the site. Therefore, the appbcant should be required to construct a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk abutting the site. If the sidewalk is detached and located outside of the existing right-of-way, the applicant should be required to provide a permanent right-of-way easement far any segment of the sidewalk located outside of the right-of--way. 3. Driveways 3.1 Franklin Road a. Existing Conditions: There is one 40-foot wide existing driveway onto Frar-klin Road located 75-feet west of the intersection of Franklin Road .and 41son Avenue (measured near edge to near edge). b. Policy Access Points Policy: District Policy 7205.4.1 states that all access points associated with development applications shall be determined in accordance with the policies in tiffs section and Section 7202. Access paints shall be reviewed only for a development app cation that is being considered by the lead land use agency. Approved access points may be relocated and/or restricted in the future if the land use intensifies, changes, or the property redewelopa. Access Policy: District policy 7205.4.7 states that direct access to principal arterials is typically prohibited. If a property has firontage on more than one street, access shah be taken from the street having the lesser functional dassification. ifi it is necessary to take access to the higher classified street due to a lack of frontage, the minimum al~wable spacing shall be based on Table 1b under District policy 7205.4.7, anises a waiver for the access point has been approved by the District Commission. Driveways, when approved on a principal arterial shall. operate as a right-in/right-out only, and the District wip require the construction of a raised m~ian to restrict the left fuming movements. Driveway Location Policy:: District policy 7205.4.7 requires driveways located on principal arterial roadways to be located a minimum of 355-feet from the nearest intersection fora right- in/right-out only driveway. Full-access driveways are not allowed on principal arterial roadways. Successive Driveways: District policy 7205.4.7 Table 1 b, requires driveways kx;ated on principal arterial roadways with a speed limit of 40 MPH to align or offset a minimum of 400- feet from any existing or proposed driveway. Driveway Width Policy: District policy 7205.4.8 restricts high-volume driveways (1001/TD or more) to a maximum width of 36-feet and low-volume driveways (less than 100 VTD) to a maximum width of 30-feet. Curb return type driveways with 30-foot radii wiN be required #or high-volume driveways with 100 VTD or more. Curb return type driveways with 15-foot radii will be required for low-volume driveways with less than 100 VTD. Driveway Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District pricy, 7205.4.8, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at Feast 30- feet into the site beyond. the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers accordance with Table 2 under District Policy 7205.4.8. 4 MAZ-12-003 ~ MCPAM-12-003 Minor Improvements Policy: District Pofrcy 7203.3 states that minor improvements to existing streets adjacent to a proposed development may be required. Thes® improvements are to ~rrect deficisnciss or replace deteriorated facilities. Included are sidewalk construction or replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused driveways with curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation or reconstruction of pedestrian ramps; pavement repairs; signs; traffic control devices; and other similar items. c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is not proposing any changes/addltions bthe existing driveways with this annexation and rezone application. d. Staff Cornments/Recommendations; The existing 40-foot wide driveway onto Franklin Road located 75-feet west of the intersection of Franklin Road and Olson Avenue jmeasured near edge to near edge) does no# meet District Access Management, Sucxessive Driveway, Driveway Location, or Width Policies, and should be closed with any future development application. The driveway would need to be closed with the construction of with vertical curb, gutter, and sidewalk to match existing conditions on Franklin Road. 3.2 Olson Avenue. a. Existing Conditions: There are no existing driveways onto Olson Avenue from the site. b. Policy: Driveway Location Policy: District policy 7208.4.1 requires driveways located near intersections to be located a minimum. of 75-feet (measured centerline-to-centeriine) from the nearest street intersection. Successive Driveways:. District Policy 7208.4.1 states that successive driveways aweiy from an intersection shall have no minimum spacing requirements for. access points akmg a .local street, but the District does encourage shared access points where appropriate. Driveway Width Policy: District poky 7208.4.3 restricts commercial driveways to a maximum width of 40-feet. Most commercial driveways will be constructed as curb-cwt type faciNties. Driveway Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create ma~tenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. in accordance with District policy, 7208.4.3, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway. c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is not proposing any driveways onto Olson Avenue with this annexation and rezone application. d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: District staff wtii review any proposed drfveways with a future development application. The applicant shall be required to meet alt District policies in effect at the time. 4. Tree Planters Tree Planter Policy: Tree Planter Policy: The District's Tree Planter Policy prohibits all trees in planters less than 8-feet in width wi#hout the installation of root barriers. Class II trees may be allowed in planters with a minimum width of 8-feet, and Chess i and Class III trees may be allowed in planters with a minimum width of 10-feet. 5. Landscaping Landscaping Policy: A license agreement is required for all landscaping proposed within ACHD right-of-way or easement areas. Tress shall be kocated no closer than 10~'eet from aA public storm drain facilities. Landscaping should be designed to eliminate site obstructions in the visbn triangle at intersections. District Policy 5104.3.1 requires a 40-foot vision triangle and a 3-foot height restriction on all landscaping located at an uncontrolled intersection and a ~-foot offset from stop signs. Landscape plans are required with the submittal of civil plans and must meet alt District. requirements prior to signature of the final plat and/or approval of the civil plans. 5 MAZ-12-003 & MCPAM-12-003 6. Other Access Franklin Road is classified as a principal arterial roadway. With a future development application, direct tot access is prohibited to this roadway. D. Site Specjfic Conditions of Approval This application is for a rezone only. Listed below are some of the site specltic conditions of approval that the ©lstrict may require when it reviews a future development application. The DiaMct msy add additional site specific requirements when !t reviews a specific redevelopment application 1. Construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk abutting the site along Olson Avenue abutting the site. If the sidelnraik is detached and located outside of the existing right-of--way, them a permanent right-of-way should be provided 2. Close the existing 40-foot driveway onto Franklin Road and replace with vertical curb, gutter, and 5-foot wide attached sidewalk to match existing conditions. 3. District staff will review any proposed driveways onto Olson Avenue with future development applications. The applicant shall be required to meet all District policies in effect at the time. 4. Direct lot access to Franklin Road is prohibited. 5. Payment of impacts are due prior to Issuance of a building permit. 6. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. E. Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Any existing Irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACRD right-of-way. 2. Private sewer or water systems are prohibited from being locafied within the ACRD right-of- way. 3. In accordance with District policy, 7203.6, the applicant may be required to update any existing non-compliant pedestrian improvements abutting the :site to meet current Americar~ with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The aaplicant's engineer should provkle documentation of ADA compliance to District Development Review staff for review. 4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 5. A license agreement and compliance with the District's Tree Planter poky is required for aU landscapir-g proposed with+n ACHD right-of-way or easement areas. 6. Ail utility relocation costs associated with .improving street frontages abutting the alts shah be looms by the developer. 7. It Is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the rigtrt-af~vay. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right~f-way. The applicant shah contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare. or fiNed) are compromised during any phase of construction. 8. Utility street .cuts to pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for detatts. 9. All design and construction shall be ~ accordance with the ACHD Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supptemerrts, Construction Services procedures and all app~cabls 6 MAZ-12-003 ~ MCPAM-12-0(33 ACRD Standards unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 10. Construction, use and property dev®lopment shall be in conformance with ail appliccable requirements of ACHD prior to District approval for occupancy. 11. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of ACRD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any Change from ACHD. 12. If the site plan or :use should change in the future, ACHD Planning Review wail review the site plan and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that time. Any change in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with ACHD Policy and Standard Conditions of .Approval in place at that time unless awaiver/variance of the requirements or other legal relief is granted by the ACHD Commission. F. Conclusions of Law 1. The proposed site plan is approved, if aH of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are satisfied. 2. ACRD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development w~l not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. G. Attachments 1. !/icinity Map 2. Site Plan 3. Utility Coordinating Council 4. Development Process .Checklist 5. Request for Reconsideration Guidelines 7 MAZ-12-003 & MCPAM-12-003 Ada County Utility Coordinating Council DeveloperfLocal Improvement District Right of Way Improvements Guideline Request Purpose: To develop the necessary avenue for proper notification to utilities of focal highway and road improvements, to help the utilities in budgeting and to clarify the already existing process. 1) Notification: Within five (5) working days upon notification of required right of way improvements by Highway entities, developers shall provide written notification to the affected utility owners and the Ada County Utility Coordinating Council (UCC). Notification shall include but not be limited to, project limits, scope of roadway improvements/project, anticipated construction dates, and any portions critical to the right of way improvements and coordination of utilities. 2) Plan Review: The developer shall provide the highway entities and all utility owners with preliminary project plans and schedule a plan review conference. Depending on the scale of utility improvements, a plan review conference may not be necessary, as determined by the utility owners. Conference notification shall also be sent to the UCC. During the review meeting the developer shall notify utilities of the status of right of way/easement acquisition necessary for their project. At the plan review conference each company shall have the right to appeal, adjust and/or negotiate with the developer on its own behalf. Each utility shall provide the developer with a letter of review indicating the costs and time required for relocation of its 8 MAZ-12-003 & MCPAM-12-003 facilities. Said letter of review is to be provided within thirty calendar days after the date of the plan review conference. 3) Revisions: The developer is responsible to provide utilities with any revisions to preliminary plans. Utilities may request an updated plan review meeting if revisions are made in the preliminary plans which affect the utility relocation requirements. Utilities shall have thirty days after receiving the revisions to review end comment thereon. 4) Final Notification: The developer will provide highway entities, utility owners and the UCC with final notification of its intent to proceed with right of way improvements and ~clude the anticipated date work will commence. This notification shall indicate that the work to be performed shall be pursuant to final approved plans by the highway entity. The developer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting prior to right of way improvements. Utility relocation activity shall be completed within the times established during the preconstruction meeting, unless otherwise agreed upon. Notification to the Ada County UCC can be senf to: 50 S. Cole Rd. Boise 83707, or Visit iducc.com for a-mail notification information. 8 MAZ-12-003 & MCPAM-12-003 Develo ment Process Checklist Items Comphted to Date: ®Submit a development appNcatbn to a Cfty or to Ada County The City or the County will. tranamit the development application to ACRD The ACRD Planning Review Section will receive the development applcaton to review (The Planning Review Section wNl do ~S of the following: ®Sentl a "No Review" letterto the applicant stating that there are no site specific conditions of approval at this time. ®Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. ®Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. ^For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" letter: • The appl~artt should submit one set of engineered plans directly to ACRD for review by the Development Review Section for plan roview and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site Mttprovements required by ACRD, then architectural plans maybe submitted for purposes of impact fee assessment.) • The applicant is requited to get a permft from Construction Services (ACRD) for ~ work in the right-of- way, inGud'rng, but not lirrtited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utiNty cuts. ^Pay Impact Fees prior to ~suance of buitding permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval. QlD YOU RE14lEM8ER: Construction (Noon-Subdivlsfor-s) ^ Driveway or Property Approach{sj • Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to ACRD Constriction (tor approval by Development Servk:es d!~ Traffic Services). There is a one week tumaroun~i for this approval. ^ Working in the ACRD Right-of--Way • Four business days prior th starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "'Temporary Highway tJse Pem>it Application` to ACRD Construction -Permits along with: a) Traffic Gontroi Plan bj An Erosion & Sediment Corrtrol Narrative & Plat, done by a CertiRed Plan Designer, tf trench ~ >50' or you are placing >E3t9t) sf of concrete or asphalt. ConsMuct/on (Subdivia/on:) ^ Sediment b Erosion 8ubmittai • At least one week prior to setNtrg up aPre-Construction Meeting an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative !& Plod, done. by a Certified Plan De~gner, must be fumed lrto ACRD Construction b be revievred and approved by ilia ACHt) Stormwater Section. ^ Idaho Power Company Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his tPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prbr to Pre-Con bethq scheduled. ^ Final Approval from Development l~ervices is required prior to sc~eduting a Pre-Con. 10 MAZ-12-U03 & MCPAM-12-Q03 Request for Appeal of Staff Decision 1. Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not .properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual. a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs. b. Initiation: An appeal is Initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of the .decision that is the subject of the appeal. The' notice of appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The .grounds shall Include a written summary of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection. c. Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A .copy of the reply and any modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal. d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's Haply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing. e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at the hearing. 11 MAZ-12-003 $ MCPAM-12-003 Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action 1. Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action: A Commissioner, a member of ACHD staff or any other person objecting to any final action taken by the Commission may request reconsideration of that action, provided the request is not for a reconsideration of an action previously requested to be reconsidered, an action whose provisions have been partly and materially carried out, or an action that has created a contractual relationship with third parties. a. Only a Commission member who voted with the prevailing side can move for reconsideration, but the motion may be seconded by any Commissioner and is voted on by all Commissioners present. If a motion to reconsider is made and seconded it is subject to a motion to postpone to a certain time. b. The request must be in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Highway District no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day prior to the Commission's next scheduled regular meeting following the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken. Upon receipt of the request, the Secretary shall cause the same to be placed on the agenda for that next scheduled regular Commission meeting. c. The request for reconsideration must be supported by written documentation setting forth new facts and information not presented at the earNer meeting, or a changed situation that has developed since the taking of the earNer vote, or information establishing an error of fact or law in the earlier action. The request may also be supported by oral testimony at the meeting. d. If a mo#ion to reconsider passes. the effect is the original matter is in the exact position it occupied the moment before it was voted on originaNy. It will normally be returned to ACHD staff for further .review. The Commission may set the date of the meetir~ st which the matter is to be returned. The Commission shall only take action on the original matter at a meeting where the agenda notice so provides. e. At the meeting where the. original matter is again on the agenda for Commission action, interested persons and ACHD staff may present such written and oral testimony as the President of the Commission determines to be appropriate, and the Commissron may take any action the majority of the Commission deems advisable. f. If a motion to reconsider passes, the applicant may be charged a reasonable fee, to cover administrative costs, as established by the Commission. 12 MAZ-12-003 & MCPAM-12-003 .. ~~ TRICT CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT Return to: HEALTH Environmental Health Division ^ ACZ DEPARTMENT ^ Boise ^ Eagle Rezone # /¢ Z. / 2--d~ 3 ^ Garden City Conditional Use # CP~r~t ~a -~o~ ^ Kuna Preliminary /Final /Short Plat ~eridian __ ^ Star `;~1. We have No Objections to this Proposal. ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ waste flow characteristics ^ bedrock from original grade ^ other ^ 6. This office may require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and surface waters. ^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. ^ 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ^ central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage ^ central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water ^ 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality: ^ central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines . ^ central water ^ 10. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ 11. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store ^ 13. Infiltration beds for storm water disposal are considered shallow injection wells. submitted to CDHD. ^ 14. ^ child care center An application and fee must be Reviewed By: Date: 7 /~Z /~ Review Sheet 16726.001EH1111 ~i~ ~ 72aew/ra &?N.etcds'aw 9~ntyatioa D<a~tee 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 Phones: Area Code 208 City of Meridian City Clerk's Office 33 E Broadway Avenue Ste 102 Meridian, ID 83642-2619 RE: CPAM 12-003 & AZ 12-003/2950 E. Franklin Rd. Dear Jaycee: OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District (NMID) has no comment on the above-referenced application for Comprehensive Plan or Annexation & Zoning. All laterals and waste ways must be protected. NMID's Snyder Lateral courses through this project with an easement of forty feet (40'); twenty feet (20') each side of centerline. All municipal surface drainage must be retained on-site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, NMID must review drainage plans. The Developer must comply with Idaho Code 31- 3805. Sincerely, I'" , Andy M dsen Asst. Water Superintendent Nampa ~ Meridian irrigation District AM/dbg PC: File/Office APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 July 18, 2012 \DAMp * ~ 9 ~~.0 Q~i p9TAT10N O~QP July 9, 2012 IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT P.O. Box 8028 Boise, ID 83707-2028 (208) 334-8300 itd.idaho.gov Machelle Hill City Clerk's Office City of Meridian 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Meridian Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zoning (CPAM 12-003 and AZ 12-003) Dear MS Hill: The Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) has reviewed the referenced comprehensive plan amendment. ITD has the following review comments: 1. ITD has no objection to these applications and requires no mitigation. The trip generation is similar to that envisioned in the existing Comprehensive Plan and the project does not require access to the State Highway System. 2. Please note that ITD is in the process of installing median islands in SH-55 (Eagle Road). The new medians will prohibit the eastbound left turns from Lanark Street. The northbound left turns from SH-55 to Lanark Street will not be restricted. If you have any questions, you may contact Matt Ward at 334-8341 or me at 334-8377. Sincerely, Dave Szplett Access Management Manager dave.szplett(~itd.idaho.aov