Loading...
2012 04-05E IDIAN~ MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING IDAHO COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA City Council Chambers 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho Thursday, April 05, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. AMENDED AGENDA 1. Roll-call Attendance X Tom O'Brien _X Steven Yearsley X Michael Rohm _X Joe Marshall X Scott Freeman -Chairman 2 3. 4. Adoption of the Agenda Approved as Amended Consent Agenda A. Approve Minutes of March 15, 2012 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Approved Action Items A. Public Hearing: CUP 12-003 Capital Christian Wireless Communications Facility by Tony Wilson Located at 2760 E. Fairview Avenue Request: Conditional Use Permit Approval to Construct and Operate a Wireless Communication Facility Consisting of Five (5) 120-Foot High Monopole Stealth Towers and Five (5) Equipment Shelters in an L-O Zoning District Continue Public Hearing to May 17, 2012 Planning & Zoning Meeting B. Public Hearing: CUP 12-002 Signature Smiles by Dale Binning Located at 3200 and 3250 N. Leslie Way Request: Conditional Use Permit for a Healthcare (Dental) Ofhce in C-G and C-N Zoning Districts as Required by the Development Agreement Approved C. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP 12-002 Signature Smiles by Dale Binning Located at 3200 and 3250 N. Leslie Way Request: Conditional Use Permit for a Healthcare (Dental) Ofhce in C-G and C-N Zoning Districts as Required by the Development Agreement Approved Meeting Adjourned at 7:38 p.m. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda -Thursday, April 05, 2012Page 1 of 1 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Meridian Planning and Zoning Meeting April 5, 2012 Meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of April 5, 2012, was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Scott Freeman. Present: Chairman Scott Freeman and Commissioner Tom O'Brien, Commissioner Michael Rohm, Commissioner Steven Yearsley and Commissioner Joe Marshall. Others Present: Machelle Hill, Ted Baird, Pete Friedman, and Dean Willis. Item 1: Roll-Call Attendance: Roll-call X Steven Yearsley X Tom O'Brien X Michael Rohm X Joe Marshall X Scott Freeman -Chairman Freeman: Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. At this time I'd like to call to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission for this date of April 5th, 2012, beginning with roll call. Freeman: Thank you. Before we adopt the agenda, which we are going to do in just a minute, I wanted to let the audience know -- anybody here who is here to participate in the public hearing for CUP 12-003, Capital Christian Wireless Communications Facility, the applicant has asked to continue that to the next meeting, which is going to be the May 7th hearing date. So, we are going to be opening that today for the sole purpose of continuing it and that's all and, then, it will be heard on that date. So, that item won't be heard today. So, if you are here for that purpose you're .welcome to stay if you would like to, but there won't be any opportunity to participate or hear the applicant's testimony or the staff report. Item 2: Adoption of the Agenda. Freeman: With that the first item that we need to take care of is the adoption of the agenda, with one amendment, that Item A, public hearing for CUP 12-003, Capital Christian Wireless Communications facility, will be opened for the sole purpose of continuing this item to the regularly scheduled meeting of May 17th. And it will be opened only for that purpose. So, could I get a motion? O'Brien: So moved. Marshall: Second. Freeman: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as amended. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. Meridian Planning & Zoning April 5, 2012 Page 2 of 14 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 3: Consent Agenda A. Approve Minutes of March 15, 2012 Planning and Zoning Commissioner Meeting Freeman: Okay. The next item on the agenda is the Consent Agenda. We only have the approval of the minutes of March 15th, 2012, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on the Consent Agenda. Could I get a motion to approve the Consent Agenda? Yearsley: So moved. Marshall: Second. Freeman: I have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Freeman: Okay. Before we get into the first public hearing on Item B, I just wanted to review for everyone the process here, so you can kind of understand how this is going to work. We are going to open the item and, then, immediately hear the staff report on how the application adheres to the Comprehensive Plan Uniform Development Code, then, the applicant will be given 15 minutes to come and testify, tell us about the application, after which time any public testimony will be taken by anyone else that wishes to speak. There are sign-up sheets in the back. If you came with the purpose of testifying it would be helpful if you would put your name on that list. But even if you don't I will give you the opportunity to speak if you would like to. You will be given three minutes to offer public testimony. After which time the applicant will have another opportunity for ten minutes to address anything that has been heard. We will, then, close the public hearing, the Commission will deliberate on the item and, hopefully, we will be able to close up with a recommendation for City Council. Item 4: Action Items B. Public Hearing: CUP 12-002 Signature Smiles by Dale Binning Located at 3200 and 3250 N. Leslie Way Request: Conditional Use Permit for a Healthcare (Dental) Office in C-G and C-N Zoning Districts as Required by the Development Agreement. Friedman: So, with that I'd like to at this time open the public hearing for CUP 12-002, Signature Smiles and hear the staff report. Pete. Meridian Planning & Zoning April 5, 2012 Page 3 of 14 Friedman: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Council. Again, I apologize for the technical difficulties we are having. I cannot get the Powerpoint presentation up on the public screens, so -- the Commission can see it on their screens, so, basically, what they have is a vicinity map, and aerial, the site plan that was contained in the staff report and so forth. So, with that I'll give you alittle -- I beg your pardon? Did it come up? cannot work the magic on this thing. I don't -- I have been trying every way I can to get it up there. If the Chair would like to give me a brief moment to make a recess, I can go print off staff reports for those who -- in the audience, so at least they will be able to follow along with maps and so forth. Friedman: Okay. That may not be a bad idea. Can we take a brief recess and do that? Go ahead, Pete. We will take a brief recess, so that you can make some copies for those in the audience that want to have them. (Recess: 7:05 p.m. to 7:12 p.m.) Freeman: Okay. So, we have an overhead. We are back from recess. I believe anybody in the audience that's wanted hard copies of the documents you have received those now. So, as soon as Pete's able to get the overhead going we will get the staff report going. Friedman: Although I'm not confident, since the Powerpoint's not being displayed up here, I'm not confident that we are going to get the overhead either. Freeman: We love technology. Friedman: We do when it works. I apologize, I think I'm running into the same difficulty, so -- Freeman: Okay. Friedman: -- anyway, this is an anomaly in our usually otherwise flawless presentations. But with the Commission's permission I will continue. So, the site is located at the corner of Ustick Road and Leslie Road. It's in the Champion Subdivision. The best way to describe it is just located to the west of the Center Point Subdivision and it's a bit of history. It's kind of an unusual situation. When the development was originally approved, it was approved under the name of Parkstone and this was back in 2003 and in those days the city's then zoning ordinances allowed use exceptions through the planned development process. So, when that development went through it was -- it went through as a planned development. It had a residential component and, then, it had two commercial lots and part of the original development agreement for that annexation and preliminary plat and rezone were that any future use on the commercial lots obtain a conditional use permit, even though it was zoned C-G. The conditional use permit was intended to identify uses and hours of operation in recognition of the residential properties surrounding it, at least to the north and to the west. So, there it sat for all these years. The UDC was adopted in 2005. We no longer allow these use Meridian Planning & Zoning April 5, 2012 Page 4 of 14 exceptions, but that being said, the property was vested with the C-G zoning and as the Commission knows under the current code a dental office or a professional office is considered a principally permitted use in the C-G zone. So, if that were just a free- standing C-G lot somewhere, we wouldn't be here tonight. The applicant had the choice. They could have gone in and requested an amendment to the development agreement to allow any use that would have been permitted in the C-G zone or they would -- they have elected, rather, to come through the conditional use permit process before the Commission. Either one was a hearing. One was just before the Council and one was before the Commission. They elected to make application for the conditional use permit. Staff has reviewed the application. We find it, you know, not only consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning in place, it meets all of the development standards in terms of required parking spaces fora 4,700 square foot professional office. There are two lots here under the same ownership currently and some of the parking does flow onto the adjacent lot, as well as the access -- the single point access off of Leslie straddles that lot line, if you will. So, you will note that in the recommended conditions of approval that there be a cross-access and parking agreement submitted -- or evidence of one submitted to the staff, along with a certificate of zoning compliance. A couple of the other recommended conditions of approval are that there be a limitation on the hours of use. I don't believe that's going to be a problem. We are recommending 6:00 a.m. until 11:00 p.m. in recognition of the residential properties surrounding the area. There is a long list of conditions from the Public Works Department, although many of those are just routine. So, really, the primary conditions that we have recommended for you are the evidence of the access agreement, the limitation on uses. When staff was going through the site plan we did note that the way the parking lot was currently laid out it doesn't meet our code, but that's something that we can work with them on and correct prior to CZC approval. In addition, they will be required to obtain certificate of zoning compliance and design review approval. Again, having given the building a cursory review based on our design guidelines, we find that it fits very well and comports well with the design guidelines. So, again, the primary reason for this application being before you tonight is really a technicality of the development agreement. If this were adental -- again, if this were a dental office going in any other C-G zoned parcel or lot, it would -- it would be a principally permitted use, you wouldn't even see it. So, we have had verbal communication from the applicant. I believe they are in agreement with all the recommended conditions and with that I'd be happy to answer any questions. Freeman: Thank you, Pete. Any questions of staff? Marshall: Yes, sir, Mr. Chair. Freeman: Commissioner Marshall. Marshall: Pete, a couple quick questions. One, the lots directly east of there, along the whole backside of Kohl's, what are those zoned? Friedman: I believe those are zoned C-G. Those are part of Center Point development. Meridian Planning & Zoning April 5, 2012 Page 5 of 14 Marshall: Right. With no restrictions. Friedman: If there are restrictions Idon't -- I can't bring them to mind immediately. think the plan was for them to transition into offices. If my memory serves me correctly, you have the bulk of the more intense retail use in the Center Point development and these were intended to be I believe a transitional office use. Marshall: All right. And, then, my second question, then, Pete, is how is it that the parking plot is not meeting code? Friedman: Oh, it just has to do with dimensions of the travel aisles and the actual dimensions of the parking spaces with regard to overhangs and so forth, but that can be remedied at the time of the CZC. Marshall: They are not deep enough? Friedman: They are deep enough. We require a 25 foot width for two way traffic, that sort of thing. Marshall: Correct. Staff: Again, we -- we can work with them on that at the certificate of zoning compliance. Marshall: Okay. But, again, if we are only asking for an easement -- across-access easement for the ingress-egress, does this require the other property, if it say were to be sold off, do additional parking stalls go with the other property or are they somehow retained for this purpose? And without those parking stalls, because that wipes out that whole center parking, does this facility have enough parking? Friedman: Thank you, Mr. Chair, Members of the Commission. Yeah, there is enough parking. Forty-seven hundred square feet would require nine parking spaces at the most, because it is under joint ownership, actually, it's very advantageous having that ownership arrangement, because we can get the cross-parking and cross-access agreement from a single owner, rather than having to finesse it between two property owners or get it from one property owner at this juncture and have another property owner come in the future and not understand or maybe not be willing to give that. Marshall: I guess what I had missed, Pete, was it's across-parking access easement, not just an ingress-egress easement. Friedman: Correct. Marshall: Okay. I'm sorry, I focused on ingress-egress. Thank you. Freeman: Okay. That's clarified. Any other questions of staff? Meridian Planning & Zoning April 5, 2012 Page 6 of 14 Baird: Mr. Chair? Freeman: Yes. Baird: Before we go forward I want to make sure that we have a complete record, because of the technical difficulties with the audio-visual. In case of -- any testimony that anybody gives on the matter that raises a question of anybody in the audience and if they need to see something, I would welcome them to come up during the period and ask to see in particular what is of concern, because I want the decision that's made tonight to be fully -- the public to be fully informed, so that we don't have any challenges down the road that they didn't have access to that. Just for the record, the application packet has been available on the city's website. The agency comment, the application, the draft findings, the notices in the staff report, have all been available to the public before the meeting for view. So, again, I just wanted to be -- in an abundance of caution put that out there for the people tonight. Don't feel like you -- if you need to see something just ask for it and we will get it for you. Freeman: Thank you, Ted. Do we have an available additional monitor in case that comes up? Baird:. I have got one up here that we can turn around. Freeman: Okay. Maybe we have one over here. Baird: That's connected to this. Freeman: Okay. We will figure that out as it comes. Baird: If there is something that's asked we will figure out a way to show it. Freeman: All right. Thank you. Well, at this time would the applicant like to come forward and tell us about your application. We can give you 15 minutes for your initial presentation. Binning: My name is Dale Binning, I'm the -- I live at 1590 Shenandoah Drive in Boise. I'm the project architect for Signature Smiles. We have -- our application here just -- just the things that are -- that came up with Mr. Friedman was the -- the cross-access agreement for the parking and we are in agreement with that. The shared access was a requirement from ACRD when that was developed. So, our parking was -- is a shared -- is going to be shared parking. We have -- we already have plans to create that agreement and that document and get it recorded. The -- the parking spaces we -- they are drawn -- it's an easy fix, because they were drawn at 18 foot, which is actually fairly standard if you have a -- if you can park with your bumper hanging over a sidewalk curb. Just by changing those to 17, which was in the report here, that automatically changes our 24 foot wide drive aisle to 25. So, problem solved. There was one other item -- I can't remember what it was. But I think it was just the parking. We got the -- Meridian Planning & Zoning April 5, 2012 Page 7 of 14 just a few items kind of that are kind of specific to the site. We feel that it was -- has always been a project that was very compatible to that site. We had quite a turnout for a neighborhood meeting. They all agreed that since that was actually zoned C-G, it could have been anything from a 7-Eleven to something that -- with long hours. The dental clinic was an ideal location with ideal hours. They are four days week from 9:00 to 5:00, I believe, and nothing on weekends. So, it's going to be -- the building design itself, it was -- it was intentionally placed up on the -- on the front of the lot closer to Ustick. As turns it out when -- when people were kind of looking to the site plan and they realized that the building was actually going to serve as a pretty good buffer from the traffic and the noise on Ustick and that that was a good choice, they were generally happy it wasn't placed back further on the lot with the parking out on the street. So, we think that we have -- we have done something there that's very -- very beneficial to the location and places the building right up on the street with the parking sort of concealed from the Main Street of the back. The building itself is designed intentionally to be very compatible with residential. It has a gable roof -- or a hip roof. A low profile. It has most -- all the materials on the building are found in the homes that are in the subdivision. The only difference might be the commercial aluminum glass store front entrance -- office entrance, but -- and a parking lot sitting in front of it. But we also have -- the site has -- was part of the approval with the subdivision was that it had a 20 foot buffer all the way around it, including residential. So, that is still in place. It's all maintained and it's healthy. I think there is one tree out on Ustick that died this winter, but that remains to be seen, but -- so it's all -- all taken very well care of. We are in response to the neighbor -- one of the neighbors we are adding some additional trees along the north property line to help increase and create a buffer there for just a specific request of that neighbor. I don't -- I think that was -- that was really all that I had to explain on the project. I think it's a really good project and we are very excited to work on it. I think it's a very nice project for the location and it's going to be a very nice looking building. Freeman: Thank you. Before you go, were there any questions of the applicant? All right. Thank you very much. At this time I'll take public testimony. I do have a couple of names on the list. David John. John: I didn't have public testimony, so I just -- I'm for the project. Freeman: Okay. So, you don't want to give any public testimony? All right. That's fine and -- John: It's a great site and a great project. I mean I could come up and say a few things. Freeman: If you do, please, give your name and address into the microphone when you approach, then, we can get you on the record. Thank you. John: I'm David John and my address is 3338 North Justin Avenue. 1 live just up around the corner from the lot there and I have lived in other communities in Meridian where they have had dental offices at the entrance like that and it works out fine. I have Meridian Planning & Zoning April 5, 2012 Page 8 of 14 lived in Bridgetower out off of Ustick farther out near Ten Mile and we actually -- there were two dental offices right at the entrance to the neighborhood and proved to be just -- just fine. No traffic problems. I think it's -- I think it would be a great addition to the neighborhood and, like you said, it's a lot better than having a convenience store or something like that that's open 24-7. So, other than that I think it will be fine. Freeman: Good. Thank you for your testimony. Bryan Carter. Please state your name and address for the record when you reach the microphone. Thank you. Carter: My name is Bryan, with a Y, Carter, at 2860 North Mildew Way in Meridian. live off of the southwest area of the Ustick and Locust Grove area. I am looking at the -- I do note that I'm neutral at this point on this. I do have a question and I did want to see, as I have mentioned, about the actual -- I don't have anything here that shows how the parking is going to be done. If I could look at that. Baird: Sir, thank you. Just to advise you, the protocol is to speak through the chair. Carter: Okay. Baird: And, again, (think -- I think we will make sure we get things -- Freeman: I'm the chair. Baird: I'm not allowed to answer you directly, so -- Carter: Mr. Freeman, if I can view the -- do you have the ability that I can see the parking? Freeman: I believe we do. Ted, can we make that available over here at this monitor near Pete and you could take a look. Carter: Okay. Freeman: Alternative number two. So, you have had a chance to observe the site plan off that -- Freeman: I did. And I understand where the egress and ingress sits as it's called in. Thank you. Freeman: Great. Carter: Which is going to be on Leslie Way and am I correct in understanding that there is a light at Center Point Way; is that correct? Freeman: I believe that's correct. But I will have Pete answer that question. Meridian Planning & Zoning April 5, 2012 Page 9 of 14 Friedman: I believe there is a light at Center Point Way. I think it's alert -- controlled left turn if I recall. Carter: Okay. Freeman: Yes, there is. I live in that area. There is definitely a light at that intersection. Carter: Talking to the architect on the designs and the -- and how it looks, if I may. In looking at that, other -- my question is in looking at the -- on page eight, I believe, of -- no, not eight -- nine. Let's see. Ten. Fire Department area. Fire Department 3.1 had no concerns with this application. In looking at the parking lot and whatnot, specifically Leslie Way, will there be a necessity for other developers if they put any -- develop -- do any development work for them to require a turnaround for a fire truck or will it -- or is there a through way for the fire truck in that residential area? Friedman: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, that residential area is pretty much in the process of being built out. The streets in there actually wind through there and connect and, then, there is also an entrance further to the west for Champion Park. I can't speak for the Fire Department specifically about the turnaround, but I believe this building is close enough to the road where they can access it. It's also within the distance that they can access it with their hoses and their apparatus and if we see another building on the north -- northern property boundary they will have an opportunity to comment again, but, again, not speaking for them, if they didn't require a vehicle turn around in here, then, we probably aren't likely to require one for another building in there. They can actually use the drive aisle as a turnaround if they have to. Freeman: Thank you, Pete. Carter: Thank you, Mr. Friedman. It is good, then, to see that there will not be any requirement of any future -- or potential requirement of any future developer to put in a turnaround as such was required by a church on Pienza Way, the King's Congregation, who had to spend 22,000 dollars of their tithe money to put in a turnaround, which should have been required of the developer and somehow the P&Z permitted him to not do that and I'm just glad and delighted to see that a future developer may not have the burden upon their monies to do that. Thank you. Freeman: Okay. At this time if the applicant would like you can have another ten minutes to respond to anything that you heard or embellish anything that's been previously stated. Okay. I don't have anybody else either on my list -- I forgot to ask -- that was wanting to offer public testimony. Is there anybody else in the audience that wishes to testify this evening? Okay. Well, with that could I get a motion to close the public hearing? Marshall: Mr. Chair? Freeman: Commissioner Marshall. Meridian Planning & Zoning April 5, 2012 Page 10 of 14 Marshall: I move we close the public hearing on CUP 12-002. Rohm: Second. Freeman: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on CUP 12-002, Signature Smiles. All those in favor say aye. Opposed. Public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Freeman: Any discussion, Commissioners? O'Brien: I have none. Freeman: None? Commissioner Marshall, I saw your mouth moving, so I assume you want to speak? Marshall: Mr. Chair, yes. Actually, I'm very pleased to see this. I think this is exactly the type of facility that should abut residential, it should be low intensity office, and I'm a little discouraged to see it all zoned C-G. I don't like C-G against residential. But this is the type of use that should go there and I hope that the additional lots to the east develop in a similar format. Freeman: Thank you, Commissioner Marshall. Any other comments? Yearsley: Uh -- Freeman: Commissioner Yearsley. Yearsley: Sorry. I think it's a great plan. I think the way they have got it laid out in the parking lot and the shared access I think is -- makes it nice and makes it look good to the street, so I think it's a good project. Freeman: Great. Any others? Okay. I think what we need, then, is a motion on this item. Marshall: Mr. Chair? Freeman: Commissioner Marshall. Marshall: After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve file number CUP 12-002 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 5th, 2012, with no modifications. I further move to direct staff to prepare an appropriate findings document to be considered tonight at the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing on April 5th, 2012. Yearsley: I'll second that. Meridian Planning & Zoning April 5, 2012 Page 11 of 14 Freeman: Okay. Do we have that motion correct? The Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law actually have been prepared and we are going to be recommending those, along with the approval of this item. We are going to cover two birds with one stone here. All right. I have a motion and a second to approve CUP 12-002, Signature Smiles and to recommend approval of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for this item. Marshall: Do we have to do the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law separately and -- Freeman: They were included in your motion, so I assume we are going to cover them. Marshall: Well, I was simply -- Baird: Pardon me, Mr. Chair. Simple because they are listed as a separate agenda item I think it would be cleaner just to close the hearing with the motion and have a separate motion to pass -- Freeman: That's how we normally do it. Marshall: And, Mr. Chair, my motion was simply to have staff prepare them, within the next two minutes, so that we could consider them. That is all my motion was for. Rohm: Second. Freeman: All right. Thank you. I have a motion and a second to recommend approval for CUP 12-002, Signature Smiles. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. Thank you. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. C. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP 12-002 Signature Smiles by Dale Binning Located at 3200 and 3250 N. Leslie Way Request: Conditional Use permit for a Healthcare (Dental) Office in C-G and C-N Zoning District as Required by the Development Agreement. Freeman: Now, I do need a motion regarding the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Marshall: Mr. Chair, I move that we approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for CUP 12-002 as written by staff. Yearsley: Second that. Meridian Planning & Zoning April 5, 2012 Page 12 of 14 Freeman: I have a motion and a second to approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for CUP 12-002, Signature Smiles. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Freeman: All right. Is there anything else? I don't believe there is. Friedman: Just, Chairman and Commissioners, as a point of clarification, the reason we did put the Findings on tonight, as opposed to the normal process is that it wasn't certain whether or not we were going to have a meeting the next time around, so we decided that we would put them on tonight and move this project along. Freeman: Okay. Thank you. That does occur from time to time. It seems convenient to do so. I believe I just need one more motion, then. Yearsley: Mr. Chairman? Freeman: Commissioner Yearsley. Yearsley: Just a clarification. Do we not need to open the public hearing for the CUP 12-003 and continue it as a motion? Rohm: Yeah. We do. Marshall: I believe we did that before we approved the Consent Agenda, didn't we? Rohm: No. Freeman: I thought we did that, too. Yearsley: Okay. I just wasn't sure. Freeman: I could stand corrected here. Rohm: I don't think we did. Hill: No, Mr. Chair, we did not. Rohm: We said we were going to. Freeman: We didn't do it, we just said we were going to do it. Hill: You said we were going to do it. Meridian Planning & Zoning April 5, 2012 Page 13 of 14 A. Public Hearing: CUP 12-003 Capital Christian Wireless Communications Facility by Tony Wilson Located at 2760 E. Fairview Avenue Request: Conditional Use Permit Approval to Construct and Operate a Wireless Communication Facility Consisting of five (5) 120-Foot High Monopole Stealth Towers and five (5) Equipment Shelters in an L-O Zoning District. Freeman: Thank you, Commissioner Yearsley. So, at this time I would like to open the public hearing for CUP 12-003, Capital Christian Wireless Communication, for the sole purpose of continuing it to the regularly scheduled meeting on May 17th, 2012. Yearsley: Mr. Chairman? Freeman: Commissioner Yearsley. Yearsley: I make a motion that we continue the public hearing CUP 12-003, Capital Christian Wireless Communication facility to the March -- Freeman: May. Yearsley: -- May 17th, 2012. Rohm: Second. Freeman: I have a motion and a second to continue the public hearing for CUP 12-003, Capital Christian Wireless to the May 17th public hearing. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Freeman: Thank you, Commission Yearsley, for watching my back. Now, I think I need one more motion. Rohm: Mr. Chairman? Freeman: Commissioner Rohm. Rohm: I move we adjourn. Marshall: Second. O'Brien: Second. Freeman: I have a motion and second and another second to adjourn. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. Meridian Planning & Zoning April 5, 2012 Page 14 of 14 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Freeman: We are adjourned. Thank you. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:41 P.M. (AUDIO REC0,6~DING ON FILE O~ THESE PROCEEDINGS.) AP ~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ )2 FREEMA - IRMA DATE APPROVED A /1 ~ v ~DgpTEDAUCG~ H N, C RK 3`~ ~'~ ~ 0 /+ City of ~+ IDANO s SEAL nyr~* ~~ ~! e T t F A6u0.~~~~~b Meridian Planning Zoning Commission Meeting DATE: April 5, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: 3A PROJECT NUMBER: ITEM TITLE: Approve Minutes of March 15, 2012 PZ meeting MEETING NOTES ~p~-~ -Sy l~"~'1 ,S-D CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian Planning Zoning Commission Meeting ~ DATE: April 5, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: 4~ PROJECT NUMBER: CUP 12-003 ITEM TITLE: Capital Christian Wireless Communication Facility Public Hearing -Conditional use permit approval to construct and operate a wireless communication facility consisting of five 120-foot high monopole stealth towers and five equipment shelters in an L-O zoning district by Tony Wilson - 2760 E. Fairview Avenue MEETING NOTES -rb~ int. CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian Planning Zoning Commission Meeting DATE: April 5, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: CUP 12-002 ITEM TITLE: Signature Smiles Public Hearing -Conditional use permit for a healthcare (dental) office in C-G 8~ C-N zoning districts as required by the DA by Dale Binning - 3200 8~ 3250 N. Leslie Way MEETING NOTES ~-ppvev~e. ~ ~ x'12 ~_p CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS Meridian Planning Zoning Commission Meeting DATE: April 5, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: 4C PROJECT NUMBER: CUP 12-002 ITEM TITLE: Signature Smiles Findings for Approval -Conditional use permit for a healthcare (dental) office in C-G & C- Nzoning districts as required by the DA by Dale Binning - 3200 & 3250 N. Leslie Way MEETING NOTES ,~jo pw~cd Jrn,/ ~y ~-fl CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION DATE: E-MAILED TO STAFF SENT TO AGENCY SENT TO APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS V V