2012 04-05E IDIAN~ MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING
IDAHO COMMISSION MEETING
AGENDA
City Council Chambers
33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho
Thursday, April 05, 2012 at 7:00 p.m.
AMENDED AGENDA
1. Roll-call Attendance
X Tom O'Brien _X Steven Yearsley
X Michael Rohm _X Joe Marshall
X Scott Freeman -Chairman
2
3.
4.
Adoption of the Agenda Approved as Amended
Consent Agenda
A. Approve Minutes of March 15, 2012 Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting Approved
Action Items
A. Public Hearing: CUP 12-003 Capital Christian Wireless
Communications Facility by Tony Wilson Located at 2760 E.
Fairview Avenue Request: Conditional Use Permit Approval to
Construct and Operate a Wireless Communication Facility
Consisting of Five (5) 120-Foot High Monopole Stealth Towers
and Five (5) Equipment Shelters in an L-O Zoning District
Continue Public Hearing to May 17, 2012 Planning & Zoning
Meeting
B. Public Hearing: CUP 12-002 Signature Smiles by Dale Binning
Located at 3200 and 3250 N. Leslie Way Request: Conditional
Use Permit for a Healthcare (Dental) Ofhce in C-G and C-N
Zoning Districts as Required by the Development Agreement
Approved
C. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
12-002 Signature Smiles by Dale Binning Located at 3200 and
3250 N. Leslie Way Request: Conditional Use Permit for a
Healthcare (Dental) Ofhce in C-G and C-N Zoning Districts as
Required by the Development Agreement Approved
Meeting Adjourned at 7:38 p.m.
Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda -Thursday, April 05, 2012Page 1 of 1
All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.
Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing,
please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
Meridian Planning and Zoning Meeting April 5, 2012
Meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of April 5, 2012, was called
to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Scott Freeman.
Present: Chairman Scott Freeman and Commissioner Tom O'Brien, Commissioner
Michael Rohm, Commissioner Steven Yearsley and Commissioner Joe Marshall.
Others Present: Machelle Hill, Ted Baird, Pete Friedman, and Dean Willis.
Item 1: Roll-Call Attendance:
Roll-call
X Steven Yearsley X Tom O'Brien
X Michael Rohm X Joe Marshall
X Scott Freeman -Chairman
Freeman: Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. At this time I'd like to call to order the
regularly scheduled meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission for this
date of April 5th, 2012, beginning with roll call.
Freeman: Thank you. Before we adopt the agenda, which we are going to do in just a
minute, I wanted to let the audience know -- anybody here who is here to participate in
the public hearing for CUP 12-003, Capital Christian Wireless Communications Facility,
the applicant has asked to continue that to the next meeting, which is going to be the
May 7th hearing date. So, we are going to be opening that today for the sole purpose of
continuing it and that's all and, then, it will be heard on that date. So, that item won't be
heard today. So, if you are here for that purpose you're .welcome to stay if you would
like to, but there won't be any opportunity to participate or hear the applicant's testimony
or the staff report.
Item 2: Adoption of the Agenda.
Freeman: With that the first item that we need to take care of is the adoption of the
agenda, with one amendment, that Item A, public hearing for CUP 12-003, Capital
Christian Wireless Communications facility, will be opened for the sole purpose of
continuing this item to the regularly scheduled meeting of May 17th. And it will be
opened only for that purpose. So, could I get a motion?
O'Brien: So moved.
Marshall: Second.
Freeman: I have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as amended. All those in
favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries.
Meridian Planning & Zoning
April 5, 2012
Page 2 of 14
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Item 3: Consent Agenda
A. Approve Minutes of March 15, 2012 Planning and Zoning
Commissioner Meeting
Freeman: Okay. The next item on the agenda is the Consent Agenda. We only have
the approval of the minutes of March 15th, 2012, Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting on the Consent Agenda. Could I get a motion to approve the Consent
Agenda?
Yearsley: So moved.
Marshall: Second.
Freeman: I have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. All those in
favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Freeman: Okay. Before we get into the first public hearing on Item B, I just wanted to
review for everyone the process here, so you can kind of understand how this is going
to work. We are going to open the item and, then, immediately hear the staff report on
how the application adheres to the Comprehensive Plan Uniform Development Code,
then, the applicant will be given 15 minutes to come and testify, tell us about the
application, after which time any public testimony will be taken by anyone else that
wishes to speak. There are sign-up sheets in the back. If you came with the purpose of
testifying it would be helpful if you would put your name on that list. But even if you
don't I will give you the opportunity to speak if you would like to. You will be given three
minutes to offer public testimony. After which time the applicant will have another
opportunity for ten minutes to address anything that has been heard. We will, then,
close the public hearing, the Commission will deliberate on the item and, hopefully, we
will be able to close up with a recommendation for City Council.
Item 4: Action Items
B. Public Hearing: CUP 12-002 Signature Smiles by Dale Binning
Located at 3200 and 3250 N. Leslie Way Request: Conditional
Use Permit for a Healthcare (Dental) Office in C-G and C-N
Zoning Districts as Required by the Development Agreement.
Friedman: So, with that I'd like to at this time open the public hearing for CUP 12-002,
Signature Smiles and hear the staff report. Pete.
Meridian Planning & Zoning
April 5, 2012
Page 3 of 14
Friedman: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Council. Again, I apologize for
the technical difficulties we are having. I cannot get the Powerpoint presentation up on
the public screens, so -- the Commission can see it on their screens, so, basically, what
they have is a vicinity map, and aerial, the site plan that was contained in the staff report
and so forth. So, with that I'll give you alittle -- I beg your pardon? Did it come up?
cannot work the magic on this thing. I don't -- I have been trying every way I can to get
it up there. If the Chair would like to give me a brief moment to make a recess, I can go
print off staff reports for those who -- in the audience, so at least they will be able to
follow along with maps and so forth.
Friedman: Okay. That may not be a bad idea. Can we take a brief recess and do that?
Go ahead, Pete. We will take a brief recess, so that you can make some copies for
those in the audience that want to have them.
(Recess: 7:05 p.m. to 7:12 p.m.)
Freeman: Okay. So, we have an overhead. We are back from recess. I believe
anybody in the audience that's wanted hard copies of the documents you have received
those now. So, as soon as Pete's able to get the overhead going we will get the staff
report going.
Friedman: Although I'm not confident, since the Powerpoint's not being displayed up
here, I'm not confident that we are going to get the overhead either.
Freeman: We love technology.
Friedman: We do when it works. I apologize, I think I'm running into the same difficulty,
so --
Freeman: Okay.
Friedman: -- anyway, this is an anomaly in our usually otherwise flawless
presentations. But with the Commission's permission I will continue. So, the site is
located at the corner of Ustick Road and Leslie Road. It's in the Champion Subdivision.
The best way to describe it is just located to the west of the Center Point Subdivision
and it's a bit of history. It's kind of an unusual situation. When the development was
originally approved, it was approved under the name of Parkstone and this was back in
2003 and in those days the city's then zoning ordinances allowed use exceptions
through the planned development process. So, when that development went through it
was -- it went through as a planned development. It had a residential component and,
then, it had two commercial lots and part of the original development agreement for that
annexation and preliminary plat and rezone were that any future use on the commercial
lots obtain a conditional use permit, even though it was zoned C-G. The conditional use
permit was intended to identify uses and hours of operation in recognition of the
residential properties surrounding it, at least to the north and to the west. So, there it
sat for all these years. The UDC was adopted in 2005. We no longer allow these use
Meridian Planning & Zoning
April 5, 2012
Page 4 of 14
exceptions, but that being said, the property was vested with the C-G zoning and as the
Commission knows under the current code a dental office or a professional office is
considered a principally permitted use in the C-G zone. So, if that were just a free-
standing C-G lot somewhere, we wouldn't be here tonight. The applicant had the
choice. They could have gone in and requested an amendment to the development
agreement to allow any use that would have been permitted in the C-G zone or they
would -- they have elected, rather, to come through the conditional use permit process
before the Commission. Either one was a hearing. One was just before the Council
and one was before the Commission. They elected to make application for the
conditional use permit. Staff has reviewed the application. We find it, you know, not
only consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning in place, it meets all of the
development standards in terms of required parking spaces fora 4,700 square foot
professional office. There are two lots here under the same ownership currently and
some of the parking does flow onto the adjacent lot, as well as the access -- the single
point access off of Leslie straddles that lot line, if you will. So, you will note that in the
recommended conditions of approval that there be a cross-access and parking
agreement submitted -- or evidence of one submitted to the staff, along with a certificate
of zoning compliance. A couple of the other recommended conditions of approval are
that there be a limitation on the hours of use. I don't believe that's going to be a
problem. We are recommending 6:00 a.m. until 11:00 p.m. in recognition of the
residential properties surrounding the area. There is a long list of conditions from the
Public Works Department, although many of those are just routine. So, really, the
primary conditions that we have recommended for you are the evidence of the access
agreement, the limitation on uses. When staff was going through the site plan we did
note that the way the parking lot was currently laid out it doesn't meet our code, but
that's something that we can work with them on and correct prior to CZC approval. In
addition, they will be required to obtain certificate of zoning compliance and design
review approval. Again, having given the building a cursory review based on our design
guidelines, we find that it fits very well and comports well with the design guidelines.
So, again, the primary reason for this application being before you tonight is really a
technicality of the development agreement. If this were adental -- again, if this were a
dental office going in any other C-G zoned parcel or lot, it would -- it would be a
principally permitted use, you wouldn't even see it. So, we have had verbal
communication from the applicant. I believe they are in agreement with all the
recommended conditions and with that I'd be happy to answer any questions.
Freeman: Thank you, Pete. Any questions of staff?
Marshall: Yes, sir, Mr. Chair.
Freeman: Commissioner Marshall.
Marshall: Pete, a couple quick questions. One, the lots directly east of there, along the
whole backside of Kohl's, what are those zoned?
Friedman: I believe those are zoned C-G. Those are part of Center Point development.
Meridian Planning & Zoning
April 5, 2012
Page 5 of 14
Marshall: Right. With no restrictions.
Friedman: If there are restrictions Idon't -- I can't bring them to mind immediately.
think the plan was for them to transition into offices. If my memory serves me correctly,
you have the bulk of the more intense retail use in the Center Point development and
these were intended to be I believe a transitional office use.
Marshall: All right. And, then, my second question, then, Pete, is how is it that the
parking plot is not meeting code?
Friedman: Oh, it just has to do with dimensions of the travel aisles and the actual
dimensions of the parking spaces with regard to overhangs and so forth, but that can be
remedied at the time of the CZC.
Marshall: They are not deep enough?
Friedman: They are deep enough. We require a 25 foot width for two way traffic, that
sort of thing.
Marshall: Correct.
Staff: Again, we -- we can work with them on that at the certificate of zoning
compliance.
Marshall: Okay. But, again, if we are only asking for an easement -- across-access
easement for the ingress-egress, does this require the other property, if it say were to
be sold off, do additional parking stalls go with the other property or are they somehow
retained for this purpose? And without those parking stalls, because that wipes out that
whole center parking, does this facility have enough parking?
Friedman: Thank you, Mr. Chair, Members of the Commission. Yeah, there is enough
parking. Forty-seven hundred square feet would require nine parking spaces at the
most, because it is under joint ownership, actually, it's very advantageous having that
ownership arrangement, because we can get the cross-parking and cross-access
agreement from a single owner, rather than having to finesse it between two property
owners or get it from one property owner at this juncture and have another property
owner come in the future and not understand or maybe not be willing to give that.
Marshall: I guess what I had missed, Pete, was it's across-parking access easement,
not just an ingress-egress easement.
Friedman: Correct.
Marshall: Okay. I'm sorry, I focused on ingress-egress. Thank you.
Freeman: Okay. That's clarified. Any other questions of staff?
Meridian Planning & Zoning
April 5, 2012
Page 6 of 14
Baird: Mr. Chair?
Freeman: Yes.
Baird: Before we go forward I want to make sure that we have a complete record,
because of the technical difficulties with the audio-visual. In case of -- any testimony
that anybody gives on the matter that raises a question of anybody in the audience and
if they need to see something, I would welcome them to come up during the period and
ask to see in particular what is of concern, because I want the decision that's made
tonight to be fully -- the public to be fully informed, so that we don't have any challenges
down the road that they didn't have access to that. Just for the record, the application
packet has been available on the city's website. The agency comment, the application,
the draft findings, the notices in the staff report, have all been available to the public
before the meeting for view. So, again, I just wanted to be -- in an abundance of
caution put that out there for the people tonight. Don't feel like you -- if you need to see
something just ask for it and we will get it for you.
Freeman: Thank you, Ted. Do we have an available additional monitor in case that
comes up?
Baird:. I have got one up here that we can turn around.
Freeman: Okay. Maybe we have one over here.
Baird: That's connected to this.
Freeman: Okay. We will figure that out as it comes.
Baird: If there is something that's asked we will figure out a way to show it.
Freeman: All right. Thank you. Well, at this time would the applicant like to come
forward and tell us about your application. We can give you 15 minutes for your initial
presentation.
Binning: My name is Dale Binning, I'm the -- I live at 1590 Shenandoah Drive in Boise.
I'm the project architect for Signature Smiles. We have -- our application here just -- just
the things that are -- that came up with Mr. Friedman was the -- the cross-access
agreement for the parking and we are in agreement with that. The shared access was a
requirement from ACRD when that was developed. So, our parking was -- is a shared
-- is going to be shared parking. We have -- we already have plans to create that
agreement and that document and get it recorded. The -- the parking spaces we -- they
are drawn -- it's an easy fix, because they were drawn at 18 foot, which is actually fairly
standard if you have a -- if you can park with your bumper hanging over a sidewalk
curb. Just by changing those to 17, which was in the report here, that automatically
changes our 24 foot wide drive aisle to 25. So, problem solved. There was one other
item -- I can't remember what it was. But I think it was just the parking. We got the --
Meridian Planning & Zoning
April 5, 2012
Page 7 of 14
just a few items kind of that are kind of specific to the site. We feel that it was -- has
always been a project that was very compatible to that site. We had quite a turnout for
a neighborhood meeting. They all agreed that since that was actually zoned C-G, it
could have been anything from a 7-Eleven to something that -- with long hours. The
dental clinic was an ideal location with ideal hours. They are four days week from 9:00
to 5:00, I believe, and nothing on weekends. So, it's going to be -- the building design
itself, it was -- it was intentionally placed up on the -- on the front of the lot closer to
Ustick. As turns it out when -- when people were kind of looking to the site plan and
they realized that the building was actually going to serve as a pretty good buffer from
the traffic and the noise on Ustick and that that was a good choice, they were generally
happy it wasn't placed back further on the lot with the parking out on the street. So, we
think that we have -- we have done something there that's very -- very beneficial to the
location and places the building right up on the street with the parking sort of concealed
from the Main Street of the back. The building itself is designed intentionally to be very
compatible with residential. It has a gable roof -- or a hip roof. A low profile. It has
most -- all the materials on the building are found in the homes that are in the
subdivision. The only difference might be the commercial aluminum glass store front
entrance -- office entrance, but -- and a parking lot sitting in front of it. But we also have
-- the site has -- was part of the approval with the subdivision was that it had a 20 foot
buffer all the way around it, including residential. So, that is still in place. It's all
maintained and it's healthy. I think there is one tree out on Ustick that died this winter,
but that remains to be seen, but -- so it's all -- all taken very well care of. We are in
response to the neighbor -- one of the neighbors we are adding some additional trees
along the north property line to help increase and create a buffer there for just a specific
request of that neighbor. I don't -- I think that was -- that was really all that I had to
explain on the project. I think it's a really good project and we are very excited to work
on it. I think it's a very nice project for the location and it's going to be a very nice
looking building.
Freeman: Thank you. Before you go, were there any questions of the applicant? All
right. Thank you very much. At this time I'll take public testimony. I do have a couple
of names on the list. David John.
John: I didn't have public testimony, so I just -- I'm for the project.
Freeman: Okay. So, you don't want to give any public testimony? All right. That's fine
and --
John: It's a great site and a great project. I mean I could come up and say a few things.
Freeman: If you do, please, give your name and address into the microphone when you
approach, then, we can get you on the record. Thank you.
John: I'm David John and my address is 3338 North Justin Avenue. 1 live just up
around the corner from the lot there and I have lived in other communities in Meridian
where they have had dental offices at the entrance like that and it works out fine. I have
Meridian Planning & Zoning
April 5, 2012
Page 8 of 14
lived in Bridgetower out off of Ustick farther out near Ten Mile and we actually -- there
were two dental offices right at the entrance to the neighborhood and proved to be just
-- just fine. No traffic problems. I think it's -- I think it would be a great addition to the
neighborhood and, like you said, it's a lot better than having a convenience store or
something like that that's open 24-7. So, other than that I think it will be fine.
Freeman: Good. Thank you for your testimony. Bryan Carter. Please state your name
and address for the record when you reach the microphone. Thank you.
Carter: My name is Bryan, with a Y, Carter, at 2860 North Mildew Way in Meridian.
live off of the southwest area of the Ustick and Locust Grove area. I am looking at the --
I do note that I'm neutral at this point on this. I do have a question and I did want to see,
as I have mentioned, about the actual -- I don't have anything here that shows how the
parking is going to be done. If I could look at that.
Baird: Sir, thank you. Just to advise you, the protocol is to speak through the chair.
Carter: Okay.
Baird: And, again, (think -- I think we will make sure we get things --
Freeman: I'm the chair.
Baird: I'm not allowed to answer you directly, so --
Carter: Mr. Freeman, if I can view the -- do you have the ability that I can see the
parking?
Freeman: I believe we do. Ted, can we make that available over here at this monitor
near Pete and you could take a look.
Carter: Okay.
Freeman: Alternative number two. So, you have had a chance to observe the site plan
off that --
Freeman: I did. And I understand where the egress and ingress sits as it's called in.
Thank you.
Freeman: Great.
Carter: Which is going to be on Leslie Way and am I correct in understanding that there
is a light at Center Point Way; is that correct?
Freeman: I believe that's correct. But I will have Pete answer that question.
Meridian Planning & Zoning
April 5, 2012
Page 9 of 14
Friedman: I believe there is a light at Center Point Way. I think it's alert -- controlled
left turn if I recall.
Carter: Okay.
Freeman: Yes, there is. I live in that area. There is definitely a light at that intersection.
Carter: Talking to the architect on the designs and the -- and how it looks, if I may. In
looking at that, other -- my question is in looking at the -- on page eight, I believe, of --
no, not eight -- nine. Let's see. Ten. Fire Department area. Fire Department 3.1 had
no concerns with this application. In looking at the parking lot and whatnot, specifically
Leslie Way, will there be a necessity for other developers if they put any -- develop -- do
any development work for them to require a turnaround for a fire truck or will it -- or is
there a through way for the fire truck in that residential area?
Friedman: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, that residential area is pretty
much in the process of being built out. The streets in there actually wind through there
and connect and, then, there is also an entrance further to the west for Champion Park.
I can't speak for the Fire Department specifically about the turnaround, but I believe this
building is close enough to the road where they can access it. It's also within the
distance that they can access it with their hoses and their apparatus and if we see
another building on the north -- northern property boundary they will have an opportunity
to comment again, but, again, not speaking for them, if they didn't require a vehicle turn
around in here, then, we probably aren't likely to require one for another building in
there. They can actually use the drive aisle as a turnaround if they have to.
Freeman: Thank you, Pete.
Carter: Thank you, Mr. Friedman. It is good, then, to see that there will not be any
requirement of any future -- or potential requirement of any future developer to put in a
turnaround as such was required by a church on Pienza Way, the King's Congregation,
who had to spend 22,000 dollars of their tithe money to put in a turnaround, which
should have been required of the developer and somehow the P&Z permitted him to not
do that and I'm just glad and delighted to see that a future developer may not have the
burden upon their monies to do that. Thank you.
Freeman: Okay. At this time if the applicant would like you can have another ten
minutes to respond to anything that you heard or embellish anything that's been
previously stated. Okay. I don't have anybody else either on my list -- I forgot to ask --
that was wanting to offer public testimony. Is there anybody else in the audience that
wishes to testify this evening? Okay. Well, with that could I get a motion to close the
public hearing?
Marshall: Mr. Chair?
Freeman: Commissioner Marshall.
Meridian Planning & Zoning
April 5, 2012
Page 10 of 14
Marshall: I move we close the public hearing on CUP 12-002.
Rohm: Second.
Freeman: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on CUP 12-002,
Signature Smiles. All those in favor say aye. Opposed. Public hearing is closed.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Freeman: Any discussion, Commissioners?
O'Brien: I have none.
Freeman: None? Commissioner Marshall, I saw your mouth moving, so I assume you
want to speak?
Marshall: Mr. Chair, yes. Actually, I'm very pleased to see this. I think this is exactly
the type of facility that should abut residential, it should be low intensity office, and I'm a
little discouraged to see it all zoned C-G. I don't like C-G against residential. But this is
the type of use that should go there and I hope that the additional lots to the east
develop in a similar format.
Freeman: Thank you, Commissioner Marshall. Any other comments?
Yearsley: Uh --
Freeman: Commissioner Yearsley.
Yearsley: Sorry. I think it's a great plan. I think the way they have got it laid out in the
parking lot and the shared access I think is -- makes it nice and makes it look good to
the street, so I think it's a good project.
Freeman: Great. Any others? Okay. I think what we need, then, is a motion on this
item.
Marshall: Mr. Chair?
Freeman: Commissioner Marshall.
Marshall: After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve
file number CUP 12-002 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of April 5th,
2012, with no modifications. I further move to direct staff to prepare an appropriate
findings document to be considered tonight at the Planning and Zoning Commission
hearing on April 5th, 2012.
Yearsley: I'll second that.
Meridian Planning & Zoning
April 5, 2012
Page 11 of 14
Freeman: Okay. Do we have that motion correct? The Findings of Facts and
Conclusions of Law actually have been prepared and we are going to be recommending
those, along with the approval of this item. We are going to cover two birds with one
stone here. All right. I have a motion and a second to approve CUP 12-002, Signature
Smiles and to recommend approval of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for
this item.
Marshall: Do we have to do the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law separately
and --
Freeman: They were included in your motion, so I assume we are going to cover them.
Marshall: Well, I was simply --
Baird: Pardon me, Mr. Chair. Simple because they are listed as a separate agenda
item I think it would be cleaner just to close the hearing with the motion and have a
separate motion to pass --
Freeman: That's how we normally do it.
Marshall: And, Mr. Chair, my motion was simply to have staff prepare them, within the
next two minutes, so that we could consider them. That is all my motion was for.
Rohm: Second.
Freeman: All right. Thank you. I have a motion and a second to recommend approval
for CUP 12-002, Signature Smiles. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion
carries. Thank you.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
C. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP
12-002 Signature Smiles by Dale Binning Located at 3200 and
3250 N. Leslie Way Request: Conditional Use permit for a
Healthcare (Dental) Office in C-G and C-N Zoning District as
Required by the Development Agreement.
Freeman: Now, I do need a motion regarding the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law.
Marshall: Mr. Chair, I move that we approve the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law for CUP 12-002 as written by staff.
Yearsley: Second that.
Meridian Planning & Zoning
April 5, 2012
Page 12 of 14
Freeman: I have a motion and a second to approve the Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law for CUP 12-002, Signature Smiles. All those in favor say aye.
Opposed? Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Freeman: All right. Is there anything else? I don't believe there is.
Friedman: Just, Chairman and Commissioners, as a point of clarification, the reason
we did put the Findings on tonight, as opposed to the normal process is that it wasn't
certain whether or not we were going to have a meeting the next time around, so we
decided that we would put them on tonight and move this project along.
Freeman: Okay. Thank you. That does occur from time to time. It seems convenient
to do so. I believe I just need one more motion, then.
Yearsley: Mr. Chairman?
Freeman: Commissioner Yearsley.
Yearsley: Just a clarification. Do we not need to open the public hearing for the CUP
12-003 and continue it as a motion?
Rohm: Yeah. We do.
Marshall: I believe we did that before we approved the Consent Agenda, didn't we?
Rohm: No.
Freeman: I thought we did that, too.
Yearsley: Okay. I just wasn't sure.
Freeman: I could stand corrected here.
Rohm: I don't think we did.
Hill: No, Mr. Chair, we did not.
Rohm: We said we were going to.
Freeman: We didn't do it, we just said we were going to do it.
Hill: You said we were going to do it.
Meridian Planning & Zoning
April 5, 2012
Page 13 of 14
A. Public Hearing: CUP 12-003 Capital Christian Wireless
Communications Facility by Tony Wilson Located at 2760 E.
Fairview Avenue Request: Conditional Use Permit Approval to
Construct and Operate a Wireless Communication Facility
Consisting of five (5) 120-Foot High Monopole Stealth Towers
and five (5) Equipment Shelters in an L-O Zoning District.
Freeman: Thank you, Commissioner Yearsley. So, at this time I would like to open the
public hearing for CUP 12-003, Capital Christian Wireless Communication, for the sole
purpose of continuing it to the regularly scheduled meeting on May 17th, 2012.
Yearsley: Mr. Chairman?
Freeman: Commissioner Yearsley.
Yearsley: I make a motion that we continue the public hearing CUP 12-003, Capital
Christian Wireless Communication facility to the March --
Freeman: May.
Yearsley: -- May 17th, 2012.
Rohm: Second.
Freeman: I have a motion and a second to continue the public hearing for CUP 12-003,
Capital Christian Wireless to the May 17th public hearing. All those in favor say aye.
Opposed? Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Freeman: Thank you, Commission Yearsley, for watching my back. Now, I think I need
one more motion.
Rohm: Mr. Chairman?
Freeman: Commissioner Rohm.
Rohm: I move we adjourn.
Marshall: Second.
O'Brien: Second.
Freeman: I have a motion and second and another second to adjourn. All those in
favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries.
Meridian Planning & Zoning
April 5, 2012
Page 14 of 14
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Freeman: We are adjourned. Thank you.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:41 P.M.
(AUDIO REC0,6~DING ON FILE O~ THESE PROCEEDINGS.)
AP
~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ )2
FREEMA - IRMA DATE APPROVED
A
/1 ~ v ~DgpTEDAUCG~
H N, C RK 3`~ ~'~
~ 0 /+ City of
~+ IDANO
s
SEAL
nyr~* ~~ ~! e T t F A6u0.~~~~~b
Meridian Planning Zoning Commission Meeting
DATE: April 5, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: 3A
PROJECT NUMBER:
ITEM TITLE:
Approve Minutes of March 15, 2012 PZ meeting
MEETING NOTES
~p~-~
-Sy l~"~'1
,S-D
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
Meridian Planning Zoning Commission Meeting ~
DATE: April 5, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: 4~
PROJECT NUMBER: CUP 12-003
ITEM TITLE: Capital Christian Wireless Communication Facility
Public Hearing -Conditional use permit approval to construct and operate a wireless
communication facility consisting of five 120-foot high monopole stealth towers and five
equipment shelters in an L-O zoning district by Tony Wilson - 2760 E. Fairview Avenue
MEETING NOTES
-rb~ int.
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
Meridian Planning Zoning Commission Meeting
DATE: April 5, 2012
ITEM NUMBER:
PROJECT NUMBER: CUP 12-002
ITEM TITLE: Signature Smiles
Public Hearing -Conditional use permit for a healthcare (dental) office in C-G 8~ C-N
zoning districts as required by the DA by Dale Binning - 3200 8~ 3250 N. Leslie Way
MEETING NOTES
~-ppvev~e. ~ ~ x'12 ~_p
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
Meridian Planning Zoning Commission Meeting
DATE: April 5, 2012 ITEM NUMBER: 4C
PROJECT NUMBER: CUP 12-002
ITEM TITLE: Signature Smiles
Findings for Approval -Conditional use permit for a healthcare (dental) office in C-G & C-
Nzoning districts as required by the DA by Dale Binning - 3200 & 3250 N. Leslie Way
MEETING NOTES
,~jo pw~cd Jrn,/ ~y ~-fl
CLERKS OFFICE FINAL ACTION
DATE: E-MAILED TO
STAFF SENT TO
AGENCY SENT TO
APPLICANT NOTES INITIALS
V V