Loading...
Public TestimonyN-25-2012 20:26 From: L. Ko~arik January 25, 2012 208 288 0015 To:8884218 To: The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian Fax: 888-421 S From: Larry E Kovarik 2686 E Green Canyon Dr Meridian, Idaho 83642 288-0015 IrkovCcUaol.com Re: Public Hearing for Gramercy LLC Rezone --- Feb. 2, 2012 To whom it may concern, Paee:1~4 Page 1 First of all, in general, l would like to state for the record, that ! am opposed to the proposed re plat and rezone from R-15, TN-C, and C-G to R-40 of the properties within the Gramercy development south of E Overland and S Wells. The reason that! oppose this is increased population densfir. Currently within that area, they have the ability fo build apartments with a lesser density. It was approved approximately in or around 2006 to have some type of multi-family housing (condominiums, townhouses, or apartments) to be surrounded by residential homes, courtyard homes, and brownstones (see attached blocks 3, 4, 5, 8 6). Part of that original plan has already been constructed In the western portion of that drawing with residential homes and an apartment complex consisting of 3 buildings each with 16 units. In my opinion, continuing the same architectural style and size apartments inside of block 5 makes the most sense, and also keeps the population density at a reasonable level with regard to 1) traffic ingress and egress to that area, 2) lights and lighting, 3) noise, 4) foot traffic to the existing parks and walkways, and 5) possibility of any type of increased crimes. Secondly, this type of density does not belons~ immediately next to residential neighborhoods where people live and raise their children. l'm not convinced it belongs anywhere within the core of any city. Yes, it maybe argued that it is necessary to provide this type of housing for individuals that cannot afford homes, but again, I argue that the density should be kept to a minimum. 1 fully understand the economics of developers wanting a higher density rate, but that doesn't mean it should be allowed or accepted. !f the City of Meridian wants to approve this type of situation, then designate peripheral areas of land for this type of development. Next, how many times in a short period of years is a parcel going fo be replatted and rezone? It was not that long ago that this area was farmland, and the City of Meridian zoned it for various types of development. Again, 1 understand that housing sales are way down these days, and it's the owner/developer's interest to capitalize on the best use of the land, which they claim is apartments, but maybe they need to ride out the storm like all the homeowner's that have lost a considerable amount of equity in their homes, like myself. What if 1 approached the City after meeting with my neighbors and asked to have my property rezoned to convert my home into multi-family? I'm confident that wouldn't be allowed. Last, I did attend both neighborhood meetings on October 26 and December t of last year with one or all in attendance of Architect Rob Thornton, Civil Engineer Becky McKay, and Project Manager Taylor Merrill. 1 will admit that from these meetings, Gramercy LLC was receptive to make some changes from their earliest proposal, the biggest being moving the entire apartment complex as far northward as to abut E Blue Horizon Dr. It was also from these meetings that Mr. Lyman Holyoak and 1 were named by our homeowner associations to represent them for any and all discussions outside of the neighborhood meetings with Gramercy LLC. (cont:) JAN-25-2012 20:26 From: L. Kovarik 208 288 0015 To:8884218 Public Hearing for Gramercy LLCRezone --- Feb. 2, 2012 (cone) Pa9e:2~4 Page 2 Ifl and only if, this re-plat and rezone were fo be approved by both your P 8 Z Board and also Meridian Cify Council, then it was agreed from the discussions Mr. Holyoak and/or myself had with either or all Architect Rob Thornton, Project Manager Taylor Merrill and owner/developer Greg Johnson during several meetings that the following would be contained and written info future documents as suggested by your Board and/or Meridian City Council; 1) The apartments would be located as far north as to abut E Blue Horizon Dr and have a spine road provided by a permanent easement running from E B-ue Horizon Dr north and south the entire lensrth of the apartment complex as to provide ingress and egress to the remaining parcel of land adjoining this parcel to the south. **'Also, as requested by homeowner representative's Holyoak and Kovarik, an attempt would be made to avoid any and all ingress and egress to thaf most southerly parcel from both E Copper Point and E Griffon (other than defined by Meridian City or ACHD law or ordinances) in future development of that parcel. 2) Iron fencing and landscaping would be installed of the ve onset and be innin of the entire apartment complex construction on the most southern and southwestern borders, 3) The landscaping on the most southern border will be installed with mature trees, shrubs, etc. to be as thick as possible as to block as much of the view and noise to the surrounding residents of Corey Barton Homes and Thousand Springs. "**Also, as requested by homeowner representative's Holyoak and Kovarik, the ground cover beneath all the southern and southwestern landscape should be bermed high enough to prevent car lights from showing through and reduce noise to the south and southwestern residential communities and should include rock rather fhan grass or any other type of material. 4) *"'~It was requested by homeowner representative's Holyoak and Kovarik that the garages for this entire complex be constructed on the southern border rather than the eastern border to also reduce lights and noise to the surrounding homeowner residents. 5) At the verv onset and beninninq_ of the entire apartment complex construction, it was requested that as much and as tall landscaping as possible be installed on the most southwestern border over the ACHD Drainage Easement as permitted, again, to block light and noise. 6) All of the grounds lighting (on poles, inside of carports, on the sides of the buildings, etc.) will point downward and be subdued and all patio lighting for each unit will be recessed and also point downward and be subdued. 7) CCR's or whatever written document is necessary would spell out tenant restrictions regardfng noise, storage of items, and vehicles. No storage or trash permitted whatsoever in open view to the public on patios or within the carport areas. No unlicensed vehicles whatsoever permitted to be parked anywhere on premises. 8) Trash bins, if necessary on the southern and southwestern borders, will be placed in the most least conspicuous areas and be completely surrounded by a brick, block, or stucco enclosure and have anon-see•thru gate. (cont.) JAN-25-2012 20:26 From: L. Ko~arik 208 288 0015 To:8884218 Pa9e:3~4 Public Hearing for Gramercy LLCRezone --• Feb. 2, 2012 (cont.) Page 3 Again, it is important to paint out that all of the prior requests and recommendations must be guaranteed by some means in writing by the owner/developer of this prope-fy if this re plat and reaone is to occur. !t must also be passed to any and all new owner/developers or partners of this property if that shall occur. As /stated at the beginning of this letter, my Prst choice is for the Meridian Planning and Zoning Board to deny the re•plat and reaone of the safd parcel to R-40 based on the problems associated with increased density and also since that entire parcel was just approved in or around 2006 for C-G, TN-C, and R-15, and a preliminary plan was drawn and conveyed to the public as seen in the attached drawing for residential homes, courtyard homes, and brownstones surrounding multi-family housing of some nature. However, if the Meridian P 8 Z Board along with the City of Meridian Mayor and City Council deem this necessary for community development, then the described parcel needs to adhere to those tentative agreements made between the homeowner representatives Holyoak and Kovarik and the representatives of Gramercy LLC. I will be present at the meefing on February 2, 2012, and any questions pertaining this letter can be directed tome either that night or prior byphone or a-mail. Thank you, rry E K varik Date i ~~~~ ~~:~+ ~~ +~~~~II~ ~~~'' ~~~~ ~~~~~1~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~'~ ~~~~ ~,`~oY ~~ ~M• D* 8TZb888~o1 :.~ • ;;a=•• .~. ._.... Y ^.l;a a ;:~~ - <• : ~ . ...: '¢~'r : ~ s(is~Q~ 'i~ r4. i.µ ~~ k G~•ti €i'~li i~~~~~. rev x`e7`e_ ~j~~/~~'~~ ~O~ /v r ' Vim' , ~a t/i9~1~ ST00 88Z 80Z ~?.~eno~ •1:wo.~~ 9Z~0Z ZZOZ-SZ-Nti!' 1/24/2012 08:27 FAX 208 288 6393 January 24, 2012 HR BOISE FAX To: The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian From: Harvard Hanks Geneva Han#cs 2592 E Green Canyon Dr Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Feb. 2, 2012 Public Hearing for Gramercy LLC Rezone To whom it may concern, f~001/001 After meeting with the Architect Rob Thornton, Civil Engineer Becky McKay, and Project Manager Taylor Merrill on October 26 and December 1, 2011, and also after having and sharing discussions with Thousand SpringslGramercy (Corey Barton Homes) representatives Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak, we are still in opposition to the proposed re-plat and rezone from R-15, TN-C, and C-G to R-40 of the properties within the Gramercy development south of E Overland and S Wells. Although Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak described to us some of the changes Gramercy LLC were willing to make to accommodate the residents of Thousand Springs and Gramercy (Corey Barton Homes), we still feel that the current density R-15 with the last proposed plans in or around 2006 to build multi-family housing of either apartments, condominiums, or townhouses is sufficient for that area. We understand the current economic conditions and why the ownerldeveloper is interested in making the change to capitalize on those conditions, but R-40 zoning, in our opinion, is unacceptable because of the possibility of the following; 1) Increased traffic flow both in and out at all times of the day 2) Increased crime of any or all nature(s) 3) Additional lights 4) Additional noise 5) Additional foot traffic through our neighborhoods 6) Other not mentioned Much to our dismay with the new 48 apartments being built back there now, if the approximate 2006 plan to add more of those type of units eastward were to continue, surrounded by courtyard homes, residential homes, and brownstones, as drawn in that plan, most likely that would mean maybe the addition of no more than 48 to 90 extra units (3 to 5 added buildings of 16 units like the current structures being built). We would have to accept that plan as that was our understanding when purchasing our existing home. Sincerely, Harvard Hanks Harvard Hanks Geneva Hanks Geneva Hanks Date: 23 January 2012 _..,.,...,,,._y`_... 01/26/2012 16:35 FAX 2083847294 January 24, 2012 BOISE PAPER SOLUTIONS To:,The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian From: OSNu~ ~ GL ~ ~/~~~~ Z~(v 1 7E, r~ ~,L Re: Feb. 2, 2012 Public Hearing for Gramercy LLC Rezone To whom it may concern, I~jool/ool 208.888-4218 (fax) After meeting with the Architect Rob Thornton, Civil Engineer Becky McKay, and Project Manager Taylor Merrill on October 2fi and December 1, 2011, and also after having and sharing discussions with Thousand SpringslGramercy (Corey Barton Homes) representatives Lany Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak, we are still in opposition to the proposed re-plat and rezone from R-15, TN-C, and C-G to R-40 of the properties within the Gramercy development south of E Overland and S Wells. Although Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak described to us some of the changes Gramercy LLC were willing to make to accommodate the residents of Thousand Springs and Gramercy (Corey Barton Homes), we still feel that the current density R-15 with the last proposed plans in or around 2006 to build multi-family housing of either apartments, condominiums, or townhouses is sufficient foc that area. We understand the current economic conditions and why the ownerldeveloper is interested in making the change to capitalize on those conditions, but R-40 zoning, in our opinion, is unacceptable because of the possibility of the following; 1) Increased traffic flow both in and out at all times of the day 2) Increased crime of any or all nature(s) 3) Additional lights 4) Additional noise 5) Additional foot traffic through our neighborhoods 6) Other not mentioned Much to our dismay with the new 48 apartments being built back there now, if the approximate 2006 plan to add more of those type of units eastward were to continue, surrounded by courtyard homes, residential homes, and brownstones, as drawn in that plan, most likely that would mean maybe the addition of no more than 48 to 90 extra units {3 to 5 added buildings of 16 units like the current structures being built). We would have to accept that plan as that was our understanding when purchasing our existing home. Sincerely, ~'~'r~ Date: January 26, 2012 To: The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian (Fax 888-4218) From: Lyman Holyoak, 2581 E Griffon St, Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Feb. 2, 2012 Public Hearing for Gramercy LLC Rezone To whom it may concern, After meeting with the Architect Rob Thornton, Civil Engineer Becky McKay, and Project Manager Taylor Merrill on October 26 and December 1, 2011, and also after having and sharing discussions with Thousand SpringslGramercy (Corey Garton Homes) representatives Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak, we are still in opposition to the proposed re-plat and rezone from R-15, TN-C, and C•G to R-40 of the properties within the Gramercy development south of E Overland and S Wells. Although Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak described to us some of the changes Gramercy LLC were willing to make to accommodate the residents of Thousand Springs and Gramercy (Corey Barton Homes), we still feel that the current density R-15 with the last proposed plans in or around 2006 to build multifamily housing of either apartments, condominiums, or townhouses is sufficient for that area. We understand the current economic conditions and why the ownerldeveloper is interested in making the change to capitalize on those conditions, but R•40 zoning, in our opinion, is unacceptable because of the possibility of the following; 1) Increased traffic flow both in and out at all times of the day 2) Increased crime of any or all nature(s) 3) Additional lights 4) Additional noise 5) Additional foot traffic through our neighborhoods 6) Other not mentioned Much to our dismay with the new 48 apartments being built back there now, if the approximate 2006 plan to add more of those type of units eastward were to continue, surrounded by courtyard homes, residential homes, and brownstones, as drawn in that plan, most likely that would mean maybe the addition of no more than 48 to 90 extra units (3 to 5 added buildings of 16 units like the current structures being built). We would have to acce t that I our din hen we invested in Gramer~Park. CEPT A BALANCED MULTI-USE DEVELOPMENT NOT A SINGLE- NDING 14 HOMES. Sincerely, w~-~- ~,~ yman Holyoak ~,Z:a6ed 8TZb888~o1 / ~ l/Z ate: Foew.aeyd puejl.~eaH:wo.~~ Oti~ST ZTOZ-9z-N JAN. 26. 2012 8:39AM January 24, 2012 To: The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian From: ~"o sl~wQ ~. ~~t.~.~l ~~,L..1 .~(0~9 ~. Grew '(~w+.'avt DY~v~ 1Mer~~.tla~n ~© a3~~~- 1 p~{, ~~oe) r3~o - oy 3s ~~~. ~ J®s~ ~a -fo k corn, r-~er~~ a 1. r...o ~ Re: Feb. 2, 2012 Public Hearing for Gramercy LLC Rezone to whom it may concern, N0. 4651 P. 2 208-688.42181fax1 After meeting with the Architect Rob Thornton, Civil Engineer Becky McKay, and Project Manager Taylor Merrill on October 26 and December 1, 2011, and also after having and sharing discussions with 'thousand SpringslGramercy (Corey Barton Homes) representatives Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak, we are still in opposition to the proposed re-plat and rezone from R-15, TN-C, and C-G to R-40 of the properties within the Gramercy development south of E Overland and S Wells. Although Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak described to us some of the changes Gramercy LLC were willing to make to accommodate the residents of Thousand Springs and Gramercy (Corey Barton Homes), we still feel that the current density R-15 with the last proposed plans in or around 2006 to build multifamily housing of either apartments, condominiums, or townhouses is sufficient for that area. We understand the current economic conditions and why the ownerldeveloper is interested in making the change to capitalize on those conditions, but R-40 zoning, in our opinion, is unacceptable because of the possibility of the following; 1) Increased traffic flow both in and out at all times of the day 2) Increased crime of any or all nature(s) 3) Additional lights 4) Additional noise S) Additional foot traffic through our neighborhoods 6) Other not mentioned % AJE~~~-~- %•,,~r.~.a1t oh l"'''~~ v" ~""~F Much to our dismay with the new 48 apartments being built back there now, if the approximate 2006 plan to add more of those type of units eastward were to continue, surrounded by courtyard homes, residential homes, and brownstones, as drawn in that plan, most likely that would mean maybe the addition of no more than 48 to 90 extra units (3 to 5 added buildings of 16 units like the current structures being built). We would have to accept that plan as that was our understanding when purchasing our existing home. Sincerely, c ~ ~~ ~ ~~ Da e: 01-26 21:47 January 24, 2~ 12 a> To: The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian From: Mark Stelluto 2699 E. Green Canyon Dr. Meridian, ID 83642 (208) 884-5546 Re: Feb. 2, 20] 2 Public Hearing for Gramercy i,I.C Rezone To whom it may concern, After meeting with the Architect Rob Thornton, Civil Engineer Becky McKay, and Project Manager Taylor Merrill on October 26 and December 1, 2011, and also after having and sharing discussions with 'I housand Springs/Gramercy (Corey Barton Homes) representatives Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak, we are still in opposition to the proposed re-plat and rezone from R-15, TN-C, and C-G to R-40 of the properties within the Gramercy development south of E Overland and S Wells. Although Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak described to us some of the changes Gramercy LLC were willing to make to accommodate the residents of Thousand Springs and Gramercy (Corey Barton Homes), we still feel that the current density R-l5 with the last proposed plans in or around 2006 to build multi-family housing of either apartments, condominiums, or townhouses is sufficient for that area. We understand the current economic conditions and why the owner/developer is interested in making the change to capitalize on those conditions, but R-40 zoning, in our opinion, is unacceptable because of the possibility of the following; 1) Increased traffic flow both in and out at all times of the day 2) Increased crime of any or all nature(s) 3) Additional lights 4) Additional noise 5) Additional foot traffic through our neighborhoods 6) Other not mentioned Much to our dismay with the new 48 apartments being built back there now, if the approximate 2006 plan to add more of those type of units eastward were to continue, surrounded by courtyard homes, residential homes, and brownstones, as drawn in that plan, most likely that would mean maybe the addition of no more than 48 to 90 extra units (3 to 5 added buildings of 16 units like the current structures being built). We would have to accept that plan as that was our understanding when purchasing our existing home. Sincerely, o~-Z5-12 P 1/1 JAN-25-2012 09:11 From: January 24, 2012 To:8884218 To: The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian From: /~ic~iard G~q/'k~.,~/.~~.~ fw~iaP~ /76ridign~ ~~ Re: Feb. 2, 2012 Public Hearing for Gramercy LLC Rezone To whom it may concern, Pa9e:2~4 After meeting with the Architect Rob Thornton, Civil Engineer Becky McKay, and Project Manager Taylor Merrill on October 26 and December 1, 2011, and also after having and sharing discussions with Thousand SpringslGramercy (Corey Barton Homes) representatives ferry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak, we are still in opposition to the proposed re-plat and rezone from R-15, TN-C, and C-G to R•40 of the properties within the Gramercy development south of E Overland and S Wells. Although ferry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak described to us some of the changes Gramercy LLC were willing to make to accommodate the residents of Thousand Springs and Gramercy (Corey Barton Homes), we still feel that the current density R-15 with the last proposed plans in or around 2006 to build multi-family housing of either apartments, condominiums, or townhouses is sufficient for that area. We understand the current economic conditions and why the owner/developer is interested in making the change to capitalize on those conditions, but R•40 zoning, in our opinion, is unacceatable because of the possibility of the following; 1) Increased traffic flow both in and out at all times of the day 2) Increased crime of any or all nature(s) 3) Additional fights 4) Additional noise 5) Additional foot traffic through our neighborhoods 6) Other not mentioned Much to our dismay with the new 48 apartments being built back there now, if the approximate 2006 plan to add more of those type of units eastward were to continue, surrounded by courtyard homes, residential homes, and brownstones, as drawn in that plan, most likely that would mean maybe the addition of no more than 48 to 90 extra units (3 to 5 added buildings of 16 units like the current structures being built). We would have to accept that plan as that was our understanding when purchasing our existing home. Sincerely, ~z Date: JAN-25-2012 09:12 From: January 24, 2012 To:8884218 Pa9e:3~4 To: The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian From: Gj~~'1P_r1i ~ LD(C~ ~ ~I 51 S • I -P~ ~ ~tb Gtr PG ~ brAN ~ ~ p ~3 coNL Re: Feb, 2, 2012 Public Hearing for Gramercy LLC Rezone To whom it may concern, After meeting with the Architect Rob Thornton, Civil Engineer Becky McKay, and Project Manager Taylor Merrill on October 26 and December 1, 2011, and also after having and sharing discussions with Thousand SpringslGramercy (Corey Barton Homes) representatives Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak, we are still in opposition to the proposed re•piat and rezone from R-15, TN-C, and C-~ to R-40 of the properties within the Gramercy development south of E Overland and S Wells. Although Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak described to us some of the changes Gramercy LLC were willing to make to accommodate the residents of Thousand Springs and Gramercy (Corey Barton Homes), we still feel that the current density R-15 with the last proposed plans in or around 2006 to build multi-family housing of either apartments, condominiums, or townhouses is sufficient for that area. We understand, the current economic conditions and why the ownerldeveloper is interested in making the change to capitalize on those conditions, but R-40 zoning, in our opinion, is unacceptable because of the possibility of the following; 1) Increased traffic flow both fn and out at all times of the day 2) Increased crime of any or all nature(s) 3) Additional lights 4) Additional noise 5) Additional foot traffic through our neighborhoods 6) Other not mentioned Much to our dismay with the new 48 apartments being built back there now, if the approximate 2006 plan to add more of those type of units eastward were to continue, surrounded by courtyard homes, residential homes, and brownstones, as drawn in that plan, most likely that would mean maybe the addition of no more than 48 to 90 extra units (3 to 5 added buildings of 16 units like the current structures being built). We would have to accept that plan as that was our understanding when purchasing our existing home, Sincerely, -'~ ~I ~~~~t~ Date: JAN-25-2012 09:12 From: January 24, 2012 To:8884218 Pa9e:4~4 To: The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian 1 From: ~~ ~ c. -~ ~ ~(' v ~ Z 7 G s ? °J l~ ~~ ~-c~ `C (~/~-/ ~~..eP ~ `~r `a- w ~-~"I ~3 L y t` Re: Feb. 2, 2012 Public Hearing for Gramercy LLC Rezone To whom it may concern, After meeting with the Architect Rob Thornton, Civil Engineer Becky McKay, and Project Manager Taylor Merrill on October 26 and December 1, 2011, and also after having and sharing discussions with Thousand SpringslGramercy (Corey Barton Homes) representatives Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak, we are still in opposition to the proposed re-plat and rezone from R-15, TN-C, and C-G to R-40 of the properties within the Gramercy development south of E Overland and S Wells. Although Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak described to us some of the changes Gramercy LLC were willing to make to accommodate the residents of Thousand Springs and Gramercy (Corey Barton Homes), we still feel that the current density R-15 with the last proposed plans in or around 2006 to build multi-family housing of either apartments, condominiums, or townhouses is sufficient for that area. We understand the current economic conditions and why the owner/developer is interested in making the change to capitalize on those conditions, but R-40 zoning, in our opinion, is unacceatable because of the possibility of the following; 1) Increased traffic flow both in and out at all times of the day 2) Increased crime of any or all nature(s) 3) Additional lights 4) Additional noise 5) Additional foot traffic through our neighborhoods 6) Other not mentioned Much to our dismay with the new 48 apartments being built back there now, if the approximate 2006 plan to add more of those type of units eastward were to continue, surrounded by courtyard homes, residential homes, and brownstones, as drawn in that plan, most likely that would mean maybe the addition of no more than 48 to 90 extra units (3 to 5 added buildings of 16 units like the current structures being built). We would have to accept that plan as that was our understanding when purchasing our existing home. Sincerely, Date: JAN-25-2012 10:34 From: January 24, 2012 To:8884218 To: The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian From; Tom and Barb Medics 2685 E Green Canyon Dr Meridian, Idaho 83642 208.871.6945 bjmedica(a~msn.com Re: Feb, 2, 2012 Public Hearing for Gramercy LLC Rezone To whom it may concern, Pa9e:2~2 After meeting with the Architect Rob Thornton, Civil Engineer Becky McKay, and Project Manager Taylor Merrill on October 26 and December 1, 2011, and also after having and sharing discussions with Thousand SpringslGramercy (Corey Barton Homes) representatives Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak, we are still in opposition to the proposed re-plat and rezone from R-15, TN-C, and C-G to R-40 of the properties within the Gramercy development south of E Overland and S Wells. Although Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak described to us some of the changes Gramercy LLC were willing to make to accommodate the residents of Thousand Springs and Gramercy (Corey Barton Homes), we still feel that the current density R-15 with the last proposed plans in or around 2006 to build multi-family housing of either apartments, condominiums, or townhouses is sufficient for that area. We understand the current economic conditions and why the owner/developer is interested in making the change to capitalize on those conditions, but R-40 zoning, in our opinion, is unacceptable because of the possibility of the following; 1) Increased traffic flow both in and out at all times of the day 2) Increased crime of any or all nature(s) 3) Additional lights 4) Additional noise 5) Additional foot traffic through our neighborhoods 6) Other not mentioned Much to our dismay with the new 48 apartments being built back there now, if the approximate 2006 plan to add more of those type of units eastward were to continue, surrounded by courtyard homes, residential homes, and brownstones, as drawn in that plan, most likely that would mean maybe the addition of no more than 48 to 90 extra units (3 to 5 added buildings of 16 units like the current structures being built). We would have to accept that plan as that was our understanding when purchasing our existing home. Sincerely, w Tom Medics; Barb Me ica Date: 01-25-12; 08: 35AM; Richard & GIoria Fern 2660 E. Green Canyon Drive Meridian ID 83642 208.887-0981 Fernga@q.com January 24, 2012 2089394840 To: The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian FAX 208.888-4218 From: Richard & Gloria Fern Re: Feb. 2, 2012 Public Hearing for Gramercy LLC Rezone To whom it may concern, # 1/ 1 After meeting with the Architect Rob Thornton, Civil Engineer Becky McKay, and Project Manager Taylor Merrill on October 26 and December 1, 2011, and also after having and sharing discussions with Thousand SpringslGramercy (Corey Barton Homes) representatives Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak, we are still in opposition to the proposed re-p[at and rezone from R-15, TN-C, and C-G to R-40 of the properties within the Gramercy development south of E Overland and S Wells. Although Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak described to us some of the changes Gramercy LLC were willing to make to accommodate the residents of Thousand Springs and Gramercy (Corey Barton Homes), we still feel that the current density R-15 with the last proposed plans in or around 2006 to build multi-family housing of either apartments, condominiums, or townhouses is sufficient for that area. We understand the current economic conditions and why the owner/developer is interested in making the change to capitalize on those conditions, but R-40 zoning, in our opinion, is unacceptable because of the possibility of the following; 1) Increased traffic flow both in and out at ail times of the day 2) Increased crime of any or all nature(s) 3) Additional lights 4) Additional noise 5) Additional foot traffic through our neighborhoods 6) Other not mentioned Much to our dismay with the new 48 apartments being built back there now, if the approximate 2006 plan to add more of those type of units eastward were to continue, surrounded by courtyard homes, residential homes, and brownstones, as drawn in that plan, most likely that would mean maybe the addition of no more than 48 to 90 extra units (3 to 5 added buildings of 16 units like the current structures being built). We would have to accept that plan as that was our understanding when purchasing our existing home. Sincerely, ~~G~ ~ j2y ! Z Richard~Fern a Date: ` ~~ ~ 24 IZ Gloria Fern ate: Jan.24.2012 09:48 PM Hersley January 24, 2012 2088980466 To: The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian PAGE. 1/ 1 From: Rochelle Hersley, 2606 Green Canyon Dr, Meridian, ID 83642, 208.884.5745; Hersley@msn.com Re: Feb. 2, 2012 Public Hearing for Gramercy LLC Rezone To whom it may concern, After meeting with the Architect Rob Thornton, Civil Engineer Becky McKay, and Project Manager Taylor Merrill on October 26 and December 1, 2011, and also after having and sharing discussions with Thousand Springs/Gramercy (Corey Barton Homes) representatives Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak, we ar® still in opposition to the proposed re•plat and rezone from R-15, TN•C, and C•G to R-40 of the properties within the Gramercy development south of E Overland and S Wells. Although Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak described to us some of the changes Gramercy LLC were willing to make to accommodate the residents of Thousand Springs and Gramercy (Corey Barton Homes), we still feel that the current density R-15 with the last proposed plans in or around 2006 to build multi-family housing of either apartments, condominiums, or townhouses is sufflclQnt for that area. We understand the current economic conditions and why the owner/developer is interested in making the change to capitalize on those conditions, but R-40 zoning, in our opinion, is unacceptable because of the possibility of the following; 1) Increased traffic flow both in and out at all times of the day 2) increased crime of any or all nature(s) 3) Additional lights 4) Additional noise 5) Additional foot traffic through our nelghborhooda 6) Other not mentioned Much to our dismay with the new 48 apartments being built back there now, if the approximate 2006 plan to add more of those type of units eastward were to continue, surrounded by courtyard homes, residential homes, and brownstones, as drawn in that plan, most likely that would mean maybe the addition of no more than 48 to 90 extra units (3 to 5 added buildings of 16 units like the current structures being built). We would have to accept that plan as that was our understanding when purchasing our existing home. Sincerely, Rochelle Hersley Date: Jan. 24. 2012 10:37AM PSI January 24, 2012 To: The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian From: Re: Feb. 2, 2012 Public Hearing for Gramercy LLC Rezone To whom It may concern, No. 6149 P. 2 After meeting with the Architect Rob Thornton, Civil Engineer Becky McKay, and Project Manager Taylor Merrill on October 26 and December 1, 2011, and also after having and shadng discussions with Thousand Springs/Gramercy (Corey Barton Homes) representatives Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak, we are still In o ositlon to the proposed re-plat and reaone from R-15, TN-C, and C-G to R-40 of the properties within the Gramercy development south of E Overland and S Wells. Although Lanry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak described to us some of the changes Gramercy LLC were willing to make to accommodate the residents of Thousand Springs and Gramercy (Corey Barton Homes), we still feel that the current density R-15 with the last proposed plans in or around 2006 to build mulll-family housing of either apartments, condominiums, or townhouses is sufficient for that area. We understand the current economic conditions and why the owner/developer is interested in making the change to capitalize on those conditions, but R-40 zoning, in our opinion, is unacceatable because of the possibility of the following; 1) Increased traffic flow both in and out at all times of the day 2) Increased crime of any or all nature(s) 3) Additional lights 4) Additional Holes 5) Additional foot traffic through our neighborhoods 6) Other not mentioned Much to our dismay with the new 48 apartments being built back there now, If the approximate 2006 plan to add more of those type of units eastward w®re to continue, surrounded by courtyard homes, residential homes, and brownstones, as drawn In that plan, most likely that would mean maybe the addition of no more than 48 to 90 extra units (3 to 5 added buildings of 16 units like the current structures being built). We would have to accept that plan as that was our understanding when purchasing our existing home. Sincerely, ' l ~ 1 t~ Christop r M. Prindle ~~ Date: 01i24i2012 09:07 January 24, 2012 US MARSHALS BOISE~ID 3 912088884218 To: The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian From: Mark and Jenna Saari, 2543 ~. Griffon, Merldian, Idaho 83642 Celt: 208.830.3907, Email: mark saari@hotmail.com Re: Feb. 2, 2012 Public Hearing for Gramercy LLC Rezone To whom it may concern, N0.267 After meeting with the Architect Rob Thornton, Civil Engineer Becky McKay, and Project Manager Taylor Merrill on October 26 and December 1, 2011, and also after having and sharing discussions with Thousand gpringslGramercy (Corey Barton Homes) representatives Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak, we are still in opposition to the proposed re-plat and rezone from R-15, TN-C, and C-G to R-40 of the properties within the Gramercy development south of E Overland and S Wells. Although Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak described to us some of the changes Gramercy LLC were willing to make to accommodate the residents of Thousand Springs and Gramercy (Corey Barton Homes), we still feel that the current density R-15 with the last proposed plans in or around 2006 to build multi-family housing of either apartments, condominiums, or townhouses is sufficient for that area. We understand the current economic conditions and why the ownerldeveloper is interested in making the change to capitalize on those conditions, but R~40 zoning, in our opinion, is unacce table because of the possibility of the following; 1) Increased traffic flow both in and out at all times of the day 2) Increased crime of any or all nature(s) 3) Additional lights 4) Additional noise 5) Additional foot traffic through our neighborhoods 6) Other not mentioned Much to our dismay with the new 48 apartments being built back there now, if the approximate 2006 plan to add more of those type of units eastward were to continue, surrounded by courtyard homes, residential homes, and brownstones, as drawn in that plan, most likely that would mean maybe the addition of no more than 48 to 90 extra units (3 to 5 added buildings of 16 units like the current structures being built). We would have to accept that plan as that was our understanding when purchasing our existing home. Sincerely, -` ( y Date: ~arl~ ~a~,~~~ D01 N-24-2012 09:41 FROM: RAC BOISE o1 2086856609 70:98884218 January 24, 2012 To: The Meridian PI 'nnirig and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian From: ~,~ rs 77 : /1.~ ~~ ---~ Re: Feb, 2, 2012 Pu lic Mlearing for Gramercy LLC Rezone To whom it may cor(Gern P.1~1 After meeting with he Architect Rob Thornton, Civil Engineer Becky McKay, and Project Manager Taylor Merrill on Oc obe ~ 26 and December 1, 2011, and also after having and sharing discussions with Thousand Springs! :ramercy (Corey Barton Homes) representatives Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak, we are still in o o itior to the proposed re•plat and re=one from R-15, TN-C, and C•G to R•40 of the properties within th ° Gramercy development south of E Overland and S Welis. Although Larry Kov rik and Lyman Holyoak described to us some of the changes Gramercy lLC were willing to make to ~ ccommodate the residents of Thousand Springs and Gramercy (Corey Barton Homes), we still fe 1 that the current density R•15 with the last proposed plans in or around 2006 to build multi-family housing of either apartments, condominiums, or townhouses is sufficient for that area. ~. We understand the °urrent economic conditions and why the owner/developer is interested in making the change to capit lice on those conditions, but R-40 zoning;°tn our opinion, is unacceptable because of the possibility of he following; ~~~~ e 1) Increased 2)Increased 3) Additions 4) Additions 5) Additions 6) Other not Much to our dism; plan to add more ~ residential homes, addition of no me structures being k purchasing our exi Sincerely, ~v ,'s T? ti~ ~~~y L~ , ~~'1.1~~~.-, . flow both in and out at all gFnes of the day ~..~. of any or all nature(s~)~~ ~- ., -. through our neighborhoods vftlt the new 48 apartments being built back there now, if the approximate 2006 hose type of units eastward were to continue, surrounded by courtyard homes, id brownstones, as drawn in that plan, most likely that would mean maybe the than 46 to 90 extra units (3 to 5 added buildings of 16 units like the current t). We would have to accept that plan as that was our understanding when ~g f~ ome. G 'l ~n ~G~c. n ~ O~ l~d? _ ~~1~ ~ ~ ~ 4l '~ Da e: January 25, 2012 ~,~~. ~ (~ riS' Y}'JC;~G o~ ~~ .L ~ C.U~~~r of C ~G~6~ ~~ ~ ~'17~~ . °~' ~ ~ g~3C~ ~ 2 ~M Sincerely, ~ Inn In ~ Q j V l `-^'~J i~G~ To: The Meridian Planning and honing Commission of the City of Meridian From: Laura McDougal Re: Feb. 2, 2012 Public Hearing for Gramercy LLC Rezone 1. To whom it may concern, After meeting with the Architect Rob Thornton, Civil Engineer Becky McKay, and Project Manager Taylor Merrill on October 26 and December 1, 2011, and also after having and sharing discussions with Thousand Springs/Gramercy (Corey Barton Homes) representatives Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak, we are still in opposition to the proposed re-plat and rezone from R-15, TN-C, and C-G to R-40 of the properties within the Gramercy development south of E Overland and S Wells. Although Larry Kovarik and Lyman Holyoak described to us some of the changes Gramercy LLC were willing to make to accommodate the residents of Thousand Springs and Gramercy (Corey Barton Homes), we still feel that the current density R-15 with the last proposed plans in or around 2006 to build multi-family housing of either apartments, condominiums, or townhouses is sufficient for that area. We understand the current economic conditions and why the ownerldeveloper is interested in making the change to capitalize on those conditions, but R-40 zoning, in our opinion, is unacceatable because of the possibility of the following; 1) Increased traffic flow both in and out at all times of the day ?) Increased crime of any or all nature(s) 3) Additional lights 4) Additional noise 5) Additional foot traffic through our neighborhoods 6) Other not mentioned Much to our dismay with the new 48 apartments being built back there now, if the approximate 2006 plan to add more of those type of units eastward were to continue, surrounded by courtyard homes, residential homes, and brownstones, as drawn in that plan, most likely that would mean maybe the addition of no more than 48 to 90 extra units (3 to 5 added buildings of 16 units like the current structures being built). We would have to accept that plan as that was our understanding when purchasing our existing home. ~~„n~x,~2..