Agency CommentsCENTRAL
•• DISTRICT
~'R' H EALT H _ , • FAX 327-8500
DEPARTMENT MAIN OFFICE • 707 N. ARMSTRONG PL. BOISE, ID 83704-0825 • (208) 375 521
"To improve the health of our contnnuzities by identifying seestaiuable solutions to comrauniry health issues,
developing partnerships for implementation of strategies, and demonstrating our success thrazgh neeasurenaent of outcomes."
12-0268
February 8, 2012
Christopher D. Rich
Ada County Recorder
200 West Front Street
Boise, ID 83702
RE: Optometrist Subdivision
Dear Mr. Rich:
Central District Health Department has reviewed and does approve the final plat for this
subdivision for central water and central sewer facilities. Final approval was given
February 8, 2012.
Sanitary Restrictions as required by Idaho Code, Title 50, Chapter 13 have been satisfied
according to this letter to be read on file with the County Recorder or his agent listing the
conditions of approval. Sanitary Restrictions may be re-imposed in accordance with Section
50-1326, Idaho Code, by the issuance of a certificate of disapproval.
If you have any questions, please call 327-8517.
Sincerely,
i'~~`
Michael H. Reno, R.E.H.S.
Supervisor
Land Based Programs
cc: Department of Housing and Urban Development
City of Meridian
McElroy Investments, LLC
KM Engineering, LLP
MHR:bm Servitag Valley, Elmore, Boise, and Ada Counties
Ada !Boise County Office Elmore County Office Valley County Office
707 N. Armstrong PI. 520 E. 8th St. North 703 N. 1st St.
ID 83638
McCall
Boise, ID 83704 Mountain Home, ID 83647 ,
634-7194
Ph
Enviro. Health: 327-7499 Enviro. Health: 587-9225 .
FAX: 634-2174
Reproductive Health: 327-7400 family Health: 587-4407
Immunizations: 327-7450 WIC: 587-4409
WIC: 327-7488 FAX: 587-3521
FAX: 327-8500
~io~wrwv'#~'uL~o S'*.rvwco
Date: December 6, 2011
To: Dr. Kevin McElroy
McElroy Investments, LLC
3022 E. Green Canyon Drive
Meridian, ID 83642
Subject: Optometrist Subdivision/MPFP-11-003
50 E. Carmel Drive
Rebecca W. Amold, President
John S. Franden, ice President
Carol A. McKee, Commissioner
Sara M. Baker, Commissioner
David L. Case, Commissioner
On December 6, 2011 the Ada County Highway District Staff acted on your application for the
above referenced project. The attached report lists site-specific requirements, conditions of
approval and street improvements, which are required.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (208) 387-6174.
Sincerely,
~~
Jarom Wagoner
Planner II
Development Services
Ada County Highway District
CC: Project file
City of Meridian (sent via email)
Kelly Kehrer, KM Enginnering, LLP (sent via email)
Ada County Highway District • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 208-387-6100 • FX 345-7650 • www.achdidaho.org
Development Services Department
s ~~~~~
~iovwrN~v~"cof!~o 5'uroco
Project/File: Optometrist Subdivision / MPFP-11-003
This application is for preliminary plat and final plat approval of a 2-lot commercial
subdivision on 1.06 acres. The site is located at 50 E. Carmel Drive in Meridian,
Idaho.
Lead Agency: City of Meridian
Site address: 50 E. Carmel Drive
Staff Approval: December 6, 2011
Applicant: Dr. Kevin McElroy
McElroy Investments, LLC
3022 E. Green Canyon Drive
Meridian, ID 83642
Representative: Kelly Kehrer
KM Engineering, LLP
391 W. State Street, Ste. A
Eagle, ID 83616
Staff Contact: Jarom Wagoner
Phone: 387-6174
E-mail: jwagoner(c~achdidaho.ora
Tech Review: December 6, 2011
A. Findings of Fact
1. Description of Application: The applicant is requesting to subdivide 1.06 acres of commercial
zoned property into two parcels. The expected use of one of the lots is for an optometrist office.
2. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area:
Direction Land Use Zonin
North Communi Business District C-C
South Rural-Urban Transition Zone RUT
East Medium-Densit Residential District R-8
West Rural-Urban Transition Zone RUT
3. Site History: ACHD staff previously reviewed this site as MCZC-11-028 & MDES-11-017 in
August of 2011. The requirements of this staff report are consistent with those of the prior action.
4. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any
building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in
effect at that time.
2 Optometrist Subdivision
5. Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)/Five Year Work Plan (FYWP):
There are currently no roadways, bridges or intersections in the general vicinity of the project that
are currently in the Five Year Work Program.
• Meridian Road is listed in the Capital Improvements Plan for Right-of-Way corridor preservation
only to accommodate the future widening of Meridian Road to five lanes between Ustick Road
and Cherry Lane between 2019 and 2027.
B. Traffic Findings for Consideration
1. Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 98 additional vehicle trips per day
(none existing); 9 additional vehicle trips per hour in the PM peak hour (none existing), based on
the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th edition.
2. Condition of Area Roadways
Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour (VPH)
PM Peak PM Peak Existing
Roadway Frontage Functional Hour Hour Level Plus
Classification Traffic Count of Service Pro'ect
Meridian 230-feet Minor Arterial 558 Better than
"
" Better
"
"
Road D than
D
Carmel Street 280-feet Local N/A N/A N/A
* Acceptable level of service for athree-lane minor arterial is "D" (720 VPH)
3. Average Daily Traffic Count (VDT)
Average daily traffic counts are based on ACHD's most current traffic counts.
• The average daily traffic count for Meridian Road south of Ustick Road was 11,475 on
November 17, 2009.
C. Findings for Consideration
1. Meridian Road
a. Existing Conditions: Meridian Road is improved with 3-travel lanes, vertical curb, gutter,
and 5-foot wide sidewalk, abutting the site. There is 60 to 70-feet of right-of-way for Meridian
Road (30 to 33-feet from centerline), abutting the site.
b. Policy
Arterial Roadway Policy: District Policy 7205.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for
improving all street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is taken
to all of the adjacent streets.
Master Street Map and Typology Policy: District Policy 7205.5 states that the design of
improvements for arterials shall be in accordance with District standards, including the Master
Street Map and Livable Streets Design Guide. The developer or engineer should contact the
District before starting any design.
Right-of-Way Policy: District Policy 7205.2.1.c states that the standard right-of-way width for
a 5-lane arterial roadway shall be 96-feet. This right-of-way allows for the construction of a S-
lane roadway with curb, gutter, 5-foot concrete detached sidewalks and bike lanes.
Street Section Policy: District Policy 7205.5.2 states that the standard 5-lane street section
for arterial streets shall be 72-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). This width typically
accommodates 2-travel lanes in each direction, a continuous center left-tum lane, and bike
lanes on a minor arterial and a safety shoulder on a principal arterial.
3 Optometrist Subdivision
Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7205.5.7 states that concrete sidewalks at least five-feet wide
are required on both sides of all arterial streets. A parkway strip at least 6-feet wide between
the back-of-curb and street edge of the sidewalk is required to provide increased safety and
protection of pedestrians. Consult the District's planter width policy if trees are to be placed
within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next to the back-of-curb shall be a minimum
of 7-feet wide.
Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway.
Meandering sidewalks are discouraged.
Appropriate easements shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed out of the right-of-way.
The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right-of--way line and 2-feet
behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located wholly within the
public right-of-way or wholly within an easement.
Minor Improvements Policy: District Policy 7203.3 states that minor improvements to
existing streets adjacent to a proposed development may be required. These improvements
are to correct deficiencies or replace deteriorated facilities. Included are sidewalk construction
or replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused
driveways with curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation or reconstruction of pedestrian ramps;
pavement repairs; signs; traffic control devices; and other similar items.
ACHD Master Street Map: ACHD Policy Section 3111.1 requires the Master Street Map
(MSM) guide the right-of-way acquisition, arterial street requirements, and specific roadway
features required through development. This segment of Meridian Road is designated in the
MSM as a Residential Arterial with 5-lanes and on-street bike lanes, a 71-foot street section
within 97-feet of right-of-way.
c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is proposing to expand the existing sidewalk by 5-feet, so
as to be 10-feet wide.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: Consistent with the MSM the applicant should be
required to either dedicate 48-feet of right-of--way (15 to 18-feet additional) from the centerline
of Meridian Road, abutting the site
OR
Provide the District with a 10-foot wide sidewalk easement, in addition to the necessary
additional right-of-way (5 to 8-feet) so as to total 48-feet from the centerline of Meridian Road,
abutting the site.
The applicant's proposal to widen the existing sidewalk on Meridian Road by 5-feet to total 10-
feet in width should be approved, as proposed. This portion of sidewalk, known as the Five
Mile Creek Pathway, is within the Meridian Pathways Master Plan.
The applicant should provide the District with a sidewalk easement for any portion of sidewalk
not located within ACHD right-of-way.
Additionally, the applicant should be required to replace any deteriorated or deficient sidewalk,
curb and/or gutter along Meridian Road abutting the site, consistent with ACHD's Minor
Improvements Policy 7203.3.
2. Carmel Drive
a. Existing Conditions: Carmel Drive is improved with 2-travel lanes, vertical curb, gutter,
and 5-foot wide sidewalk abutting the site. There is 60-feet of right-of-way for Carmel Drive
(30-feet from centerline).
4 Optometrist Subdivision
b. Policy
Local Roadway Policy: District Policy 7207.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for
improving all local street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is
taken to all of the adjacent streets.
Right-of-Way Policy: District Policy 7207.5 states that right-of-way widths for all local streets
shall general not be less than 50-feet wide.
Standard Urban (36-foot to 33-foot) Street Section Policy: District Policy 7207.5.2.1 states
that the standard street section shall be 36-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) for
developments with any buildable lot that is less than 1 acre in size. This street section shall
include curb, gutter, and minimum 5-foot concrete sidewalks on both sides.
Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7207.5.7 states that five-foot wide concrete sidewalks are
required on both sides of all local streets, except those in rural developments with net
densities of one dwelling unit per 1.0 acre or less, or in hillside conditions where there is no
direct lot frontage, in which case a sidewalk shall be constructed along one side of the street.
Some local jurisdictions may require wider sidewalks.
The sidewalk may be placed next to the back-of-curb. Where feasible, a parkway strip at least
8-feet wide between the back-of-curb and the street edge of the sidewalk is recommended to
provide increased safety and protection of pedestrians and to allow for the planting of trees in
accordance with the District's Tree Planting Policy. If no trees are to be planted in the
parkway strip, the applicant may submit a request to the District, with justification, to reduce
the width of the parkway strip.
Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway.
Meandering sidewalks are discouraged.
Appropriate easements shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed out of the right-of--way.
The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right-of-way line and 2-feet
behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located wholly within the
public right-of-way or wholly within an easement.
Minor Improvements Policy: District Policy 7203.3 states that minor improvements to
existing streets adjacent to a proposed development may be required. These improvements
are to correct deficiencies or replace deteriorated facilities. Included are sidewalk construction
or replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused
driveways with curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation or reconstruction of pedestrian ramps;
pavement repairs; signs; traffic control devices; and other similar items.
c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant has not proposed any improvements to Carmel Drive.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District Policy and
should be approved, as proposed.
The applicant should be required to replace any deteriorated or deficient sidewalk, curb and/or
gutter along Carmel Drive abutting the site, consistent with ACHD's Minor Improvements
Policy 7203.3.
3. Driveways
3.1 Meridian Road
a. Existing Conditions: There is a 35-foot wide driveway on Meridian Road located
approximately 210-feet north of the intersection of Meridian Road and Carmel Drive.
b. Policy
Access Points Policy: District Policy 7205.4.1 states that all access points associated with
development applications shall be determined in accordance with current policies and shall be
reviewed only for a development application that is being considered by the lead land use
5 Optometrist Subdivision
agency. Approved access points may be relocated and/or restricted in the future if the land
use intensifies, changes, or the property redevelops.
Number of Driveways on Arterials Policy: District Policy 7205.4.4 states that the intent of
this policy is to limit the number of access points to those that are warranted or necessary to
serve the development, while maintaining the function and performance of the arterial.
Driveway Spacing on Minor Arterials Policy: District Policy 7205.4.6 states that direct lot or
parcel access to a minor arterial is typically prohibited. If a property has frontage on more
than one street, access shall be taken from the street having the lesser functional
classification.
Successive Driveways Policy: District Policy 7205.4.6 Table 1a, requires driveways located
on minor arterial roadways away from a signalized intersection with a speed limit of 35 MPH to
align or offset a minimum of 330-feet from any existing or proposed driveway.
c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing to close the 35-foot wide driveway located
approximately 210-feet north of the intersection of Meridian Road and Carmel Drive with
vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District Policy and
should be approved, as proposed.
3.2 Carmel Drive
a. Existing Conditions: There are no driveways on Carmel Drive, abutting the site.
b. Policy
Driveway Location Policy: District Policy 7208.4.1 requires driveways located near
intersections to be located a minimum of 75-feet (measured centerline-to-centerline) from the
nearest street intersection.
Successive Driveways Policy: District Policy 7208.4.1 states that away from an intersection
there are no minimum spacing requirements for access points along a local street, but the
District does encourage shared access points where appropriate.
Driveway Width Policy: District Policy 7208.4.3 states that commercial driveways shall be
restricted to a maximum width of 40-feet. These driveways should be constructed as curb-cut
type facilities.
Driveway Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance
problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District Policy,
7208.4.3, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-
feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway.
c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct a 27-foot wide driveway
located approximate-y 175-feet east of the intersection of Carmel Drive and Meridian Road
(measured centerline-to-centerline).
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District Driveway
Policy and should be approved, as proposed.
The applicant should be required to pave the driveway its entire width at least 30-feet into the
site beyond the edge of pavement.
4. Tree Planters
Tree Planter Policy: Tree Planter Policy: The District's Tree Planter Policy prohibits all trees in
planters less than 8-feet in width without the installation of root barriers. Class II trees may be
allowed in planters with a minimum width of 8-feet, and Class I and Class III trees may be
allowed in planters with a minimum width of 10-feet.
6 Optometrist Subdivision
5. Landscaping
Landscaping Policy: A license agreement is required for all landscaping proposed within
ACHD right-of-way or easement areas. Trees shall be located no closer than 10-feet from all
public storm drain facilities. Landscaping should be designed to eliminate site obstructions in
the vision triangle at intersections. District Policy 5104.3.1 requires a 40-foot vision triangle and
a 3-foot height restriction on all landscaping located at an uncontrolled intersection and a 50-
foot offset from stop signs. Landscape plans are required with submittal of civil plans and must
meet all District requirements prior to signature of the final plat and/or approval of the civil plans.
6. Other Access
Meridian Road is classified as a minor arterial roadway. Direct lot access is prohibited to this
roadway.
D. Site-Specific Conditions of Approval
1. Dedicate 48-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Meridian Road, abutting the site. The
right-of-way purchase and sale agreement and deed must be completed and signed by the
applicant prior to scheduling the final plat for signature by the ACRD Commission or prior to
issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30
business days to process the right-of--way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The
District will purchase the right-of-way which is in addition to existing right-of--way from available
Corridor Preservation Funds.
OR
Provide the District with a 10-foot wide sidewalk easement, in addition to the necessary
additional right-of-way (5 to 8-feet) so as to total 48-feet from the centerline of Meridian Road,
abutting the site. The right-of-way purchase and sale agreement and deed must be completed
and signed by the applicant prior to scheduling the final plat for signature by the ACHD
Commission or prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever
occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of
all requested material. The District will purchase the right-of-way which is in addition to existing
right-of-way from available Corridor Preservation Funds.
2. Replace the existing 35-foot wide driveway on Meridian Road, located 210-feet north of the
intersection of Meridian Road and Carmel Drive, with vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk, as
proposed.
3. Construct a 27-foot wide driveway onto Carmel Drive so as to be located approximately 175-feet
east of the intersection of Carmel Drive and Meridian Road. Pave the driveway its full width at
least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement.
4. Direct lot access is prohibited to Meridian Road.
5. Payments of impact fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit.
6. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
E. Standard Conditions of Aaaroval
1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACRD right-of-way.
2. Private sewer/water systems are prohibited from being located within ACHD right-of-way.
3. In accordance with District policy, 7203.6, the applicant may be required to update any
existing non-compliant pedestrian improvements abutting the site to meet current Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The applicant's engineer should provide
documentation of ADA compliance to District Development Review staff for review.
7 Optometrist Subdivision
4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged
during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at
387-6280 (with file number) for details.
5. A license agreement and compliance with the District's Tree Planter policy is required for all
landscaping proposed within ACHD right-of-way or easement areas.
6. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall
be borne by the developer.
7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way.
The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant.
The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) at least two full business
days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD
Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACRD conduits (spare or filled) are
compromised during any phase of construction.
8. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in
writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file
numbers) for details.
9. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the ACRD Policy Manual, ISPWC
Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable
ACHD Standards unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of
Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
10. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements of ACHD prior to District approval for occupancy.
11. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in
writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an
authorized representative of ACHD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain
written confirmation of any change from ACHD.
12. If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACHD Planning Review will review the
site plan and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that time.
Any change in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall
require the applicant to comply with ACRD Policy and Standard Conditions of Approval in
place at that time unless awaiver/variance of the requirements or other legal relief is
granted by the ACHD Commission.
F. Conclusions of Law
1. The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval
are satisfied.
2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the
proposed development.
G. Attachments
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site Plan
3. Utility Coordinating Council
4. Development Process Checklist
5. Request for Reconsideration Guidelines
8 Optometrist Subdivision
Optometrist Subdivision
Vicinity Map
Site Plan
~~ _
R Z C
a ~~
~ g hg ~ t!
~~ » ~ `
¢$3{ pg
4 ~ ~e~ ~ ~ ~ k~ kR Z ~ ~ ~ i ~~~
'~~ a g~~=C= ~555•s N
~i~~~~:S~I~Ei~s a A~~~fi~~~LL
I!I~ e °
~:
xW
g ;~; ~; p®a~...~
~~
~ r~
~° i
e
'.
v ~ \k
~ . . ~P
z ~e ~'~,~
~ ~~_ ~ a~~gj~ ~~ g~ o ,~, ~4~
~z¢~p~ a3YC 3 l`3 Mry~^~~ ~~ y~ \
m at o I ~ B 1 /yy~' i `1
I Y i
01p ~g ~-- ~ ~~ I
r z _ _ ~ wase~•E ~saa~ - - ~ %~ i ~ ~ I ~ x
0
a pm Cr~ _ ~i~~ ~ I I yq
,~j LL S u, .~8'£B M.8£.BZ.IIONr I - ~ ~~ ~ ~ °'
a ova ~ i - __ ~~~, '',, i I I ! ~.
o ,,.
g `I ~` ~I I ~ `lU ~ l ~~~ j ~~ ~ I I
O ~~~ ~~ ~~ I~ m 8 $~ ~ ~~ I ig~
-~ I
I t====-_~_______ __________ I ^ I ~~
_ ~ SB'09L •'__ ,eL'Oet -_-~ C .oc ,a[ I
89'9x S9'IeL 3,Iyxf.OBN ~ -t-
,or,sxaw~~ I ~:. ~ - ~F
3Es ~:
.......
,uyzc~ 9rcu ~ wzoz n•w9e ~ ~ • ...
'--- '
Qd02/ NCO/b/9W %V aJ7- - - -~
....
...................... .xz-s.ex ivavzmw ....... .
10 Optometrist Subdivision
Ada County Utility Coordinating Council
Developer/Local Improvement District
Right of Way Improvements Guideline Request
Purpose: To develop the necessary avenue for proper notification to utilities of local highway
and road improvements, to help the utilities in budgeting and to clarify the already existing process.
1) Notification: Within five (5) working days upon notification of required right of way
improvements by Highway entities, developers shall provide written notification to the affected
utility owners and the Ada County Utility Coordinating Council (UCC). Notification shall include
but not be limited to, project limits, scope of roadway improvements/project, anticipated
construction dates, and any portions critical to the right of way improvements and coordination
of utilities.
2) Plan Review: The developer shall provide the highway entities and all utility owners with
preliminary project plans and schedule a plan review conference. Depending on the scale of
utility improvements, a plan review conference may not be necessary, as determined by the
utility owners. Conference notification shall also be sent to the UCC. During the review meeting
the developer shall notify utilities of the status of right of way/easement acquisition necessary
for their project. At the plan review conference each .company shall have the right to appeal,
adjust and/or negotiate with the developer on its own behalf. Each utility shall provide the
developer with a letter of review indicating the costs and time required for relocation of its
facilities. Said letter of review is to be provided within thirty calendar days after the date of the
plan review conference.
3) Revisions: The developer is responsible to provide utilities with any revisions to preliminary
plans. Utilities may request an updated plan review meeting if revisions are made in the
preliminary plans which affect the utility relocation requirements. Utilities shall have thirty days
after receiving the revisions to review and comment thereon.
4) Final Notification: The developer will provide highway entities, utility owners and the UCC with
final notification of its intent to proceed with right of way improvements and include the
anticipated date work will commence. This notification shall indicate that the work to be
performed shall be pursuant to final approved plans by the highway entity. The developer shall
schedule a preconstruction meeting prior to right of way improvements. Utility relocation activity
shall be completed within the times established during the preconstruction meeting, unless
otherwise agreed upon.
Notification to the Ada County UCC can be sent to: 50 S. Cole Rd. Boise 83707, or Visit
iducc.com for a-mail notification information.
11 Optometrist Subdivision
Development Process Checklist
Items Completed to Date:
®Submit a development application to a City or to Ada County
®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD
®The ACHD Planning Review Section will receive the development application to review
®The Planning Review Section will do one of the following:
^Send a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific conditions of approval at
this time.
®Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and
evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
^Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system
and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
ltsm~l to b~ cotngletod~lw A~i~il>c:
^For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" letter:
• The applicant should submit one set of engineered plans directly to ACRD for review by the Development
Review Section for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements
required by ACHD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee assessment.)
• The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the right-of-
way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts.
^Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval.
DID YOU REMEMBER:
Construction (Non-Subdivisions)
^ Driveway or Property Approaches)
• Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to ACHD Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic
Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval.
^ Working in the ACHD Right-of-Way
• Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit
Application" to ACHD Construction -Permits along with:
a) Traffic Control Plan
b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you
are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt.
Construction (Subdivisions)
^ Sediment & Erosion Submittal
• At least one week prior to setting up aPre-Construction Meeting an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plan,
done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACHD Construction to be reviewed and approved by the ACRD
Stormwater Section.
^ Idaho Power Company
• Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being
scheduled.
^ Final Approval from Development Services is required prior to scheduling aPre-Con.
12 Optometrist Subdivision
Request for Appeal of Staff Decision
Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant
of the final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS
Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts
presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and
capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual.
Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees
to be charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover
administrative costs.
Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal
with the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within
ten (10) working days from the date of the decision that is the
subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision
being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and
telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds
shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy
relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall
include a written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission
shall not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the
provisions of this subsection.
Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days
from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice
of the appeal, and may during such time meet with the appellant to
discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision
that is being appealed. A copy of the reply and any modifications to
the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to
the Commission hearing on the appeal.
Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the
hearing of the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the
Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held within thirty (30)
days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's
reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed,
the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the
Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing.
Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall
either affirm or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend
or supplement the decision being appealed, as such action is
adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at the
hearing.
13 Optometrist Subdivision
a ~~~~ak ~~ Dz
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-463-0092
Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861
SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
Cit}~ of Meridian
City Clerk's Office
33 E Broadway Avenue Ste 102
Meridian, II3 83642-2619
RE: PFP 11-003lOptometrist Subdivision
Dear Jaycee:
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District requires that a Land Use Change Application be filed, for
review, prior to final platting. Please contact Suzy Hewlett at 466-7861 for further information.
All laterals and waste ways must be protected. The District's Five Mile Drain courses through this
proposed project. The District's easement for the Five Mile Drain at this location is a minimum of one
hundred feet (100'), fifty feet (50') to each side of the centerline.
However please contact the District directly to verify the width of easement necessary to operate,
maintain and repair the Five Mile Drain. Please send revised plans showing exactly what proposed
encroachments, if any, will be within the District's easement and exactly how far. This easement
must be protected. Any encroachment without a signed License Agreement and approved plan
before any construction is started is unacceptable.
All municipal surface drainage must be retained on site, if any surface drainage leaves the site, NMID
must review drainage plans. The developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805.
Sincerely,
Greg G. Curtis
Water Superintendent
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District
GGC/dbg
C: File/Office
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
28 November 2011
?a &'11tur~lCaa 9zn'gar'ar~ Dtaaxrct
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 8 3 651-43 95
FAX # 208-463-0092
Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861
Kelly Kehrer, P.E. SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
KM Engineering, LLP
391 W. State Street, Suite A
Eagle, ID 83616
RE: Land Use Change Application -Optometrist Subdivision
Please note the District now requires three (3) sets of clans
Dear Kelly Kehrer:
Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to file with the Irrigation
District for its review on the above-referenced development. If this development is under a
"rush" to be finalized, I would recommend that you submit a cashier's check, money order or
cash as payment of the fees in order to speed the process up. If you submit a company or
personal check, it must clear the bank before processing the application.
Should this development be planning a pressure urban irrigation system that will be owned,
operated and maintained by the Irrigation District, I strongly urge you to coordinate with John P.
Anderson, Water Superintendent for the Irrigation District, concerning the installation of the
pressure system. Enclosed is a questionnaire that you must fill out and return in order to initiate
the process of contractual agreements between the owner or developer and the Irrigation
District for the ownership, operation and maintenance of the pressure urban irrigation system.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call on me at the District's
office, or John P. Anderson, at the District's shop.
Sincerely,
Suzett .Hewlett, Asst. SecretarylTreasurer
NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
SGH/smk
cc: File
Water Superintendent
City of Meridian
Dr. Kevin McElroy, Manager, McElroy Investments, LLC, 3022 E. Gree anyon nve,
Meridian, ID 83642 C(~py
enc. V 1
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
30 November 2011
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION DISTRICT CjO~Y
P.O. BOX 7571 BOISE, IDAHO 83707-1 57 1
PHONE: 344-2471 FAX: 343-1642
November 29, 2011
Kelly Kehrer, P.E.
KM Engineering
391 West State Street, Suite A
Eagle, ID 83616
Re: PFP I 1-003 Optometrist Subdivision
Dear Mr. Kehrer:
.j~ECEI~'~ -
NOV
3 0 2011
..1rY ar- ~ DAN
After review of the Preliminary Plat of the above-mentioned application, Settlers Irrigation
District requests the following:
1. All irrigation drainage facilities along with their easements must be protected and
continue to function. This property lies within the Settlers Irrigation District. Please
contact SID for additional requirements.
2. A Land Use Change Application must be on file prior to any approvals.
3. A license agreement MUST be signed and recorded prior to construction of any SID
facilities, or within its easements.
4. Any changes to the existing irrigation system such as relocation, water delivery, tiling,
and landscaping must be approved by Settlers Irrigation District's Board of Directors.
5. All storm drainage must be retained on-site.
6. A pressure irrigation system must be provided to service all lots within the above-
mentioned subdivision from the current delivery point.
If you have any questions please ca11343-5271.
Sincerely,
f/'`'
Nathan Draper, Manager
Settlers Irrigation District
Enclosures
Cc: City of Meridian (w/o enclosures)
CENTRAL
•• DISTRICT
~R'HEALTN
DEPARTMENT
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
Environmental Health Division
Retum to:
^ ~9~
^ Garden City
ridian
^ Kuna
^ACZ
^ star
Rezone #
Conditional Use #
Preliminary /Final /Short Plat c~ F ~
o Tom e-r,~tsr- sub~3 ~ ~.~~ ~..,
^1. We have No Objections to this Proposal.
^2 We recommend Denial of this Proposal.
^3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal.
^4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment.
^5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of:
^ high seasonal ground water ^ waste flow characteristics
^ bedrock from original grade ^ other
^6. This office may require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters andlor
surface waters.
^7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and
water availability.
~. After writte pproval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for:
ie~-itral sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well
^ interim sewage central water
^ individual sewage ^ individual water
The followi plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality:
ntral sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water
^ sewage dry lines ~ntral water
10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
^11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other
considerations indicate approval.
^12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State
Sewage Regulations.
^13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any:
^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center
^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store
^14. Please see attached stormwater management recommendations
^ 15. Reviewed By:
Dater/~,~/~
Review Sheet
15726-001EH0904