The URL can be used to link to this page

11-828 Public Works Adopting Hazard Mitigation Plan0 on CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. //.Or 0 0� BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BIRD, HOAGLUN, ROUNTREE, ZAREMBA A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADOPTING APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE ADA COUNTY ALL HAZARDS MITIGATION PLAN, DIRECTING PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF TO IMPLEMENT THE STRATEGIES THEREIN AND TO CONTINUE REPRESENTING THE CITY OF MERIDIAN IN MATTERS RELATED TO THE PLAN, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, natural hazards bearing a risk to life, property, environment and the County's economyexist within the City of Meridian, as they do throughout Ada County; and WHEREAS,p roactive mitigation of known hazards before a disaster event can reduce or eliminate long-term risk to life and property; and WHEREAS, The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-390) established new requirements for pre and post disaster hazard mitigation programs; and WHEREAS, EREAS a coalition of Ada Count stakeholders with common planning objectives, including a representative of the City of Meridian, formed the Hazard Mitigation Steering Committee to pool resources and create consistent mitigation strategies to be implemented within eachp artner's identified capabilities within the Ada County Planning Area; and WHEREAS, with public input, the Hazard Mitigation Steering Committee completed a planning tannin process that included assessing the greatest risks and vulnerabilities to the impacts of natural hazards, overall and within each jurisdiction; developing mitigation strategies, and creating the Ada County All Hazard Mitigation Plan ("ACAHMP"); WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council find that it is in the best interest of the people of Meridian to adopt and implement applicable portions of the ACAHMP; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That Volume I of the ACAHMP, the executive summary of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and the Meridian annex to and all appendices of Volume II of the ACAHMP, attached hereto as Exhibit B, are hereby adopted by and within the City of Meridian. Section 2. That City staff will use the adopted and approved portions of the ACAHMP to guide pre- and post -disaster mitigation of the hazards identified. Section 3. That City staff will coordinate the strategies identified in the ACAHMP with other planning programs and mechanisms under its jurisdictional authority. RESOLUTION ADOPTING PROVISIONS OF THE ADA COUNTY ALL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN PAGE 1 OF 2 Section 4. That City staff will continue its support of the Hazard Mitigation Steering Committee and continue to participate in the Planning Partnership as described b the HMP. ACA Y Section 5. That all ordinances, resolutions, or previous iterations of applicable hazard pp mitigation plans, or portions thereof, that are in conflict with the ACAHMP are hereby superseded and shall be void upon this resolution's adoption and approval. Section 6. That this resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon on its adoption and approval. ADOPTED b the Cit Councilday y y of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this to of December, 2011. APP ROVED by the Mayor of the Cit of Meridian Idaho this da f Y � y o December, 2011. SD A IJC&, G '1 City of E 0% Tammy de e d, Mayor IDAHO a cee SEAL ,44 r Alt.w �POfIDe TBE�►s�� City Clerk RESOLUTION ADOPTING PROVISIONS OF THE ADA COUNTY ALL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN PAGE 2 OF 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ada County and a partnership of local governments within the county have developed a hazard mitigation plan to reduce future losses resulting from disasters. Hazard mitigation is the use of long- and short-term strategies to reduce the loss of life, personal injury, and property damage that can result from a disaster. It involves planning efforts, policy changes, programs, capital projects, and other activities that can mitigate the impacts of hazards. The federal Disaster Mitigation Act (DMA) requires proactive pre -disaster planning as a condition of receiving certain financial assistance under the Robert T. Stafford Act. The DMA encourages state and local authorities to work together on pre -disaster planning, and it promotes "sustainable hazard mitigation," which includes the sound management of natural resources, local economic and social resiliency, and the recognition that hazards and mitigation must be understood in the largest possible social and economic context. The enhanced planning network called for by the DMA helps local governments accurately assess mitigation needs, resulting in faster allocation of funding and more cost- effective risk reduction projects. The responsibility for hazard mitigation lies with private property owners; business and industry; and local, state and federal government. It is impossible to predict exactly when and where disasters will occur or the extent to which they will impact an area; but with careful planning and collaboration among public agencies, stakeholders and citizens, it is possible to minimize losses that disasters can cause. PLAN UPDATE Federal regulations require hazard mitigation plans to include a plan for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the hazard mitigation plan. An update provides an opportunity to reevaluate recommendations, monitor the impacts of actions that have been accomplished, and determine if there is a need to change the focus of mitigation strategies.. DMA compliance requires that plans be updated. A jurisdiction covered by a plan that has expired is not able to pursue funding under the Robert T. Stafford Act for which a current hazard mitigation plan is a prerequisite. Initial Response to the DMA in Ada County In 2006, Ada City -County Emergency Management (ACCEM) was awarded a federal Pre -Disaster Mitigation Grant and a Wildfire Mitigation Assistance Grant to prepare the Ada County All Hazards Mitigation Plan. ACCEM hired a consultant to prepare the plan with oversight from a planning committee made up of stakeholders within the Ada County. The County Commissioner's Office contacted stakeholders directly to invite their participation and schedule meetings of the planning committee. The planning process included five phases: • 1. Collection of Data about the extent and periodicity of hazards in and around Ada County. This included an area encompassing Ada, Canyon, Owyhee, Boise and Canyon Counties to ensure a robust dataset for making inferences about hazards in Ada County specifically. • 2. Field Observations and Estimations about risks and locations of structures and infrastructure relative to risk areas. • 3. Mapping of data relevant to pre -disaster mitigation control and treatments, structures, resource values, infrastructure, risk assessments, and related data. ES -1 Ada County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update; Volume 1—Planning-Area-Wide Elements... • 4. Facilitation of Public Involvement from the formation of the planning committee to a public mail survey, news releases, public meetings, public review of draft documents and acknowledgement of the final plan by the signatory representatives. • 5. Analysis and Drafting of the Report to integrate the results of the planning process, providing ample review and integration of committee and public input, followed by signature of the final document. A principal objective of the planning process was the integration of the National Fire Plan, the Idaho Statewide Implementation Strategy, the Healthy Forests Restoration Act, the Idaho State Hazard Mitigation Plan 2004, the Ada County Comprehensive Plan, and FEMA requirements for a countywide all hazards mitigation plan. The effort used the best and most appropriate science from all partners, integrating local and regional knowledge about hazards while meeting the needs of local citizens, the regional economy and the significance of this region to the rest of Idaho and the Inland West. The plan was published in three volumes: Volume I addressed flood, landslide, earthquake and severe weather; Volume II was the wildfire mitigation plan; and Volume III contained appendices. The plan identified and prioritized 37 strategies to address flood, landslide, earthquake and severe weather and 44 strategies addressing wildfire mitigation. The Ada County Plan Update Effort Recognizing limitations in the initial plan, ACCEM utilized the plan update requirements to significantly enhance the Ada County All Hazards Mitigation Plan in scope and content. The updated plan differs from the initial plan for a variety of reasons: • Better guidance now exists on what is required to meet the intent of the DMA. • The scope of the plan has been expanded by including Special Purpose District planning partners not involved in the initial planning effort. These district planning partners are true stakeholders in mitigation within the planning area. • Newly available data and tools provide for a more detailed and accurate risk assessment. The initial plan did not use tools such as FEMA's Hazards U.S. Multi -Hazard (HAZUS-MH) computer model or new data such as FEMA's countywide Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps (DFIRMs). • The risk assessment has been prepared to better support future grant applications by providing risk and vulnerability information that will directly support the measurement of "cost-effectiveness" required under FEMA mitigation grant programs. • Science and technology have improved since the development of the initial plan. • The plan meets program requirements of the federal Community Rating System, thus reducing flood insurance premiums in participating jurisdictions. • There was a strong desire on the part of ACCEM for this plan to be a user-friendly document that is understandable to the general public and not overly technical. • The plan identifies actions rather than strategies. Strategies provide direction, but actions are fundable under grant programs. This plan replaces strategies with a guiding principal, goals and objectives. The identified actions meet multiple objectives that are measurable, so that each planning partner can measure the effectiveness of their mitigation actions. ES -2 ..EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PLAN UPDATE METHODOLOGY A partnership of local governments in the defined planning area collaborated on the development of this hazard mitigation plan update. This partnership followed a five -phase planning process over 14 months that resulted in a document that will provide a blueprint for hazard risk reduction in the Ada County planning area for the next five years. Phase 1—Organize and Review A planning team was assembled to provide technical support for the plan update, consisting of key County staff and ACCEM, as well as a technical consultant. The first step in developing the plan update was to organize the planning partnership. The County and six municipal governments committed to this update process. With special-purpose districts included, plan coverage was expanded to include 22 planning partners as shown in Table ES -1 and Table ES -2. All planning partners committed to the process by providing letters of intent to participate and agreeing to partner expectations. TABLE ES -1. MUNICIPAL PLANNING PARTNERS Boise Eagle Garden City Kuna Meridian Star Ada County TABLE ES -2. SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICT PLANNING PARTNERS Ada County Paramedics Kuna Rural Fire District North Ada County Fire and Rescue Whitney Fire Protection District Drainage District #4 Joint School District #2 Greater Boise Auditorium District Flood Control District #10 Eagle Fire District Meridian Rural Fire Protection District Star Joint Fire Protection District Boise Warm Springs Water District Eagle Sewer District Independent School District of Boise Ada County Highway District A 17 -member steering committee was assembled to oversee the development of the plan, consisting of planning partner staff, citizens, and other stakeholders in the planning area. A key function of the Steering Committee was to confirm a guiding principal, goals and objectives for this updated plan. Full coordination with other county, state and federal agencies involved in hazard mitigation occurred from the onset of the plan update process. A multi -media public involvement strategy centered on a hazard preparedness questionnaire was also implemented under this phase, as well as a comprehensive review of the previous plan and the State of Idaho Hazard Mitigation Plan. Additionally, a comprehensive review was performed of existing programs that may support or enhance hazard mitigation actions. ES -3 Ada County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update; Volume 1—Planning-Area-Wide Elements... Phase 2—Update the Risk Assessment Risk assessment is the process of measuring the potential loss of life, personal injury, economic injury, and property damage resulting from natural hazards. This process assesses the vulnerability of people, buildings and infrastructure to natural hazards. It focuses on the following parameters: • Hazard identification and profiling • The impact of hazards on physical, social and economic assets • Vulnerability identification • Estimates of the cost of potential damage or costs that can be avoided through mitigation. The risk assessment for this hazard mitigation plan meets requirements outlined in Chapter 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44CFR). Phase 2 occurred simultaneously with Phase 1, with the two efforts using information generated by one another to create the best possible risk assessment. This was the most comprehensive phase of the plan update process. All facets of the risk assessment of the plan were visited by the planning team and updated with the best available data and technology. Phase 3—Engage the Public A public involvement strategy was developed by the Steering Committee that maximized the capabilities of the planning partnership. This strategy was implemented by the planning team and included three public meetings early in the plan update process, one public meeting to review the draft plan, distribution of a hazard mitigation survey, a County -sponsored website dedicated to the plan update, and multiple media releases throughout the process. Phase 4—Assemble the Updated Plan The planning team and Steering Committee assembled key information from Phases 1, 2 and 3 into a document to meet the DMA requirements for all planning partners. Under 44CFR, a local hazard mitigation plan must include the following: • A description of the planning process • Risk assessment • Mitigation strategy – Goals – Review of alternatives – Prioritized "action plan" • Plan maintenance section • Documentation of adoption. The updated plan contains two volumes. Volume 1 contains all components that apply to all partners and the broader planning area (plan process, outreach strategy, plan maintenance, risk assessment, goals, objectives and countywide initiatives). Volume 2 contains all components that are jurisdiction -specific (ranking of risk, capability assessment, an action plan, prioritization of that action plan and a status report on prior actions). Each planning partner has a dedicated chapter in Volume 2. ES -4 .EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Phase 5—Plan Adoption/Implementation The final adoption phase will begin once pre -adoption approval is granted by Idaho Bureau of Homeland Security (IBHS) and FEMA. Each partner will adopt the updated plan individually. A plan implementation and maintenance section included in this document details the formal process for ensuring that the plan remains active and relevant. The plan maintenance process includes a schedule for monitoring and evaluating the plan's progress annually and producing a plan revision every five years. Throughout the life of this plan, a steering committee representative of the original committee will provide a consistent source of guidance and oversight. The plan adoption phase includes strategies for continued public involvement and incorporation of the recommendations of this plan into other planning mechanisms within the planning area, such as general plans, capital improvement plans, building codes, and emergency management plans. MISSION STATEMENT, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The following mission statement guided the Steering Committee and the planning partnership in selecting the initiatives contained in this plan update: To reduce the vulnerability to natural hazards in order to protect the health, safety, welfare and economy of the Ada County community. The Steering Committee and the planning partnership established the following goals for the plan update: I. Protect lives and reduce hazard -related injuries. 2. Minimize or reduce damage from natural hazards to property, including critical facilities. 3. Encourage the development and implementation of long-term, cost-effective mitigation projects. 4. Maintain, enhance and restore the natural environment's capacity to deal with the impacts of natural hazard events. 5. Improve emergency management preparedness, collaboration, and outreach within the planning area. Plan objectives were developed through a facilitated exercise that focused.on finding objectives that meet multiple goals. The objectives are listed in Table ES -3. MITIGATION INITIATIVES Mitigation initiatives are activities to reduce or eliminate losses resulting from natural hazards. Mitigation initiatives are the key element of the hazard mitigation plan update. By implementing these initiatives, the planning partnership will strive to become disaster -resistant through sustainable hazard mitigation. The Ada County planning partnership has identified over 200 initiatives that will strive to reduce risk to the hazards of concern identified in this plan. Although adoption of this plan makes the planning partners eligible for FEMA grant funding, the purposes of the plan go beyond grant eligibility. It was important to the planning partnership and the Steering Committee to look at initiatives that will work through all phases of emergency management. Some of the initiatives outlined in this plan are not grant eligible but were chosen for their effectiveness in achieving the goals of the plan. A series of countywide initiatives were identified, as summarized in Table ES -4. Jurisdiction -specific initiatives are listed in Volume 2 of this plan. ES -5 Ada County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update, Volume 1—Planning-Area-Wide Elements... IMPLEMENTATION Full implementation of the recommendations of this plan will require time and resources. Specific recommendations and plan review protocols are provided to evaluate changes in vulnerability and action plan prioritization after the plan is adopted. The true measure of the plan's success will be its ability to adapt to the changing climate of hazard mitigation. Funding resources are always evolving, as are state and federal mandates. Ada County and its planning partners have a long-standing tradition of proactive response to issues that may impact local citizens. Each local government will assume responsibility for adopting the recommendations of this plan and committing resources toward implementation. The framework established by this plan identifies a strategy that maximizes the potential for implementation based on available and potential resources. It commits all planning partners to pursue initiatives when the benefits of a project exceed its costs. The planning partnership developed this plan with extensive public input, and public support of the actions identified in this plan will help ensure the plan's success. ES -6 TABLE ES -3. OBJECTIVES FOR NATURAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE Objective Number Objective Statement 1 Minimize disruption of local government and commerce operations caused by natural hazards 2 Using best available data and science, continually improve understanding of the location and potential impacts of natural hazards, vulnerability of building types and community development patterns; based on this analysis, identify and _ _ _ _ implement the measures needed to enhance life 3 Retrofit, purchase or relocate structures based on one or more of the following criteria: level of exposure, repetitive loss history, and previous damage from natural hazards. 4 Prevent or discourage new development in hazardous areas; if building occurs in high-risk areas, ensure that it is done in such a way as to minimize risk. 5 Integrate hazard mitigation policies into community land use plans that not only protect the built up environment but also maintain or enhance the natural environment's ability to withstand and recover from natural disasters, with an emphasis on the promotion of regional_ consistency_ inlicy. 6 Strengthen codes and code enforcement to ensure that new construction of property and infrastructure can withstand the im acts of natural hazards. _ 7 Develop new and improve existing early warning emergency notification protocol, systems and evacuation procedures. 8 Educate the public on the area's potential natural hazards and ways to personally ............... preparefor, respond to, recover from and mitigate --the impacts of these events_ _ 9 Establish a partnership among all levels of government and the business community to iTpjrove and_i dement methods to protect property_ _ _ _� _ 10 Increase resilience and the continuity of operations of identified critical facilities and infrastructure within the planning area. IMPLEMENTATION Full implementation of the recommendations of this plan will require time and resources. Specific recommendations and plan review protocols are provided to evaluate changes in vulnerability and action plan prioritization after the plan is adopted. The true measure of the plan's success will be its ability to adapt to the changing climate of hazard mitigation. Funding resources are always evolving, as are state and federal mandates. Ada County and its planning partners have a long-standing tradition of proactive response to issues that may impact local citizens. Each local government will assume responsibility for adopting the recommendations of this plan and committing resources toward implementation. The framework established by this plan identifies a strategy that maximizes the potential for implementation based on available and potential resources. It commits all planning partners to pursue initiatives when the benefits of a project exceed its costs. The planning partnership developed this plan with extensive public input, and public support of the actions identified in this plan will help ensure the plan's success. ES -6 ...EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE ES -4. ACTION PLAN—COUNTYWIDE MITIGATION INITIATIVES Hazards Addressed Lead Agency Possible Funding Sources or Resources Time Linea Objectives CW-1—Sponsor and maintain a natural -hazard informational website to include the following types of information: • Hazard -specific information such as warning, private property mitigation alternatives, important facts on risk and vulnerability • Pre- and post -disaster information such as notices of grant funding availability • CRS creditable information • Links to planning partners' pages, FEMA and Idaho Bureau of Homeland Security • Natural hazard mitigation plan information such as progress reports, mitigation success stories, update strategies, Steering Committee meetings. All ACCEM ACCEM Operation Budget Short term, 2,8,9 ongoing CW-2—The Steering Committee will remain as a viable body over time to monitor progress of the plan, provide technical assistance to planning partners and oversee the update of the plan according to schedule. This body will continue to operate under the ground rules established at its inception. All ACCEM Can be funded under existing programs Short term, 5,8,9 ongoing CW-3—All planning partners that committed to the update effort will formally adopt this plan when pre -adoption approval has been granted by IBHS and FEMA Region X. Each planning partner will adhere to the plan maintenance protocol identified in this plan. All actions under this initiative will be coordinated by ACCEM All ACCEM/ Each planning Can be funded under existing programs Short term All partner CW -4 --Continue to implement ongoing public outreach programs administered by ACCEM. Seek opportunities to promote the mitigation of natural hazards within the planning area, utilizing information contained within this plan. All ACCEM Can be funded under existing programs Short term, 2,8,9 ongoing CW-5—Seek the use of the best available data, science and technology to update the risk assessment to this plan as that data, science, technology and funding resources become available. All ACCEM FEMA Hazard Mitigation Grant Long -Term, 2,9 funding, RiskMAP, federal hazard depends on analysis funding funding CW -(Continue to support and coordinate with the Idaho Silver Jackets program. All ACCEM Can be funded under existing programs Short term, 2,6,8,9 ongoing CW -7— Provide technical support and coordination for available grant funding opportunities to the planning partnership All ACCEM Can be funded under existing programs. Short term 2,9 This technical assistance is a reimbursable activity under FEMA Hazard Mitigation Gran Programs CW-8—Participate as a cooperating partners with FEMA and other stakeholders in FEMA's RiskMAP initiative All ACCEM Can be funded under existing programs. Short term 2,9 Could be subsidized with funding under the RiskMAP initiative ES -7 Ada County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update; Volume 1—Planning-Area-Wide Elements... TABLE ES -4. ACTION PLAN—COUNTYWIDE MITIGATION INITIATIVES Hazards Addressed Lead Agency Possible Funding Sources or Resources Time Linea 2 jectives CW -9— Leverage public outreach partnering capabilities (such as CERT) within the planning area to promote a uniform and consistent message on the importance of proactive hazard mitigation. All ACCEM ACCEM Operation Budget Short Term, All ongoing CW -10— Coordinate mitigation planning and project efforts within the planning area to leverage all resources available to the planning partnership. All ACCEM ACCEM Operation Budget Short Term, 1,9,10 ongoing CW -11— Where appropriate, support retrofitting, purchase, or relocation of structures located in hazard -prone areas to protect structures from future damage, with repetitive and severe repetitive loss properties as a priority. Seek opportunities to leverage partnerships within the planning area in these pursuits. All Planning Partners Hazard Mitigation Grant funding Long-term, 3,9 depends on funding CW -12— Utilize information contained within the Ada County Hazard Mitigation Plan to support updates to other emergency management plans in effect within the planning area. All ACCEM Can be funded under existing programs Short term, 1,2,5,10 ongoing CW -13 --Using the most current HAZUS model and other data available, examine exposure and level of risk to the known hazards of concern for first responder facilities and identified potential sheltering sites. All ACCEM, all first responder Can be funded under existing programs Long -Term, 2,9 planning partners depends on funding CW -14— Based on identified risks, relocate or structurally harden first responder facilities as needed. Relocation may not be an option based on response requirements of the organization. All ACCEM, all I' Responder Hazard Mitigation or Emergency Long -Term, 3,9 Planning Partners management grant funding depends on funding CW -15— Using the most current HAZUS model and other data available, categorize potential sheltering sites from lowest to highest exposure to the known hazards of concern. Identify partners that own the sheltering sites and encourage building enhancements at those sites that would allow for operations during a major disaster event. All ACCEM, all Planning Partners Can be funded under existing programs, Long -Term, 2,9 to be augmented by Mitigation Planning depends on grant funding at next plan update. funding ES -8 CHAPTER 7. CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEX 7.1. HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact Kyle Radek, City Engineer Mollie Mangerich 33 E. Broadway Ave 33 E. Broadway Ave Meridian, ID 83642 Meridian, ID 83642 Telephone: 208.898.5500 Telephone: (208)898-5500 e-mail Address: kradek@meridiancity.org e-mail Address: mman erg ichhkmeridiancity.org 7.2. JURISDICTION PROFILE The following is a summary of key information about the jurisdiction and its history: • Date of Incorporation—August, 1903 • Current Population -75,290 as of 2/23/2009 • Population Growth—Meridian has seen significant growth in the last 10 years, with an increase of 12.8% since 2009. Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho (COMPASS) estimates that the population of Meridian will increase to 138,564 by 2035, an increase of over 70%. • Location and Description—Meridian is not only geographically located in the center of the Treasure Valley, but it also is the population center of the Treasure Valley; people are evenly distributed in all directions from Meridian. Downtown Meridian is approximately 10 miles from the heart of Boise. • Brief History—Meridian has transformed from a sagebrush -filled mail drop located on the Oregon Trail in the 1880s, to a small fruit orchard center after the turn of the century through the 1930s, to a dairy -based farming community in the 1940s. Meridian is named for Idaho's principle meridian used for the initial survey of the state which coincides with Meridian Road at the center of the City. Its character as a small farming community continued until approximately 1990, when its population was still about 10,000. • Climate—Meridian is favored by a mild, and climate. July is the hottest month, with the average high temperature of 90° F. January is the coldest month with an average low temperature of 22° F. The normal precipitation pattern in the Meridian area shows a winter high of 1.2 inches of precipitation per month and a very pronounced summer low of about 0.1 inches. Typically there are 12 inches of annual precipitation. • Governing Body Format—Meridian uses the Mayor -Council form of local government. In Meridian, the Council, which includes the Mayor, possesses both legislative and executive authority. Departments include: City Clerk, Finance, Fire, Human Resources, Mayor's Office, Parks & Recreation, Planning, Police, and Public Works. • Development Trends—As of 2009, single family housing is the predominant development in Meridian, accounting for 88% of all dwelling units. Additionally, Meridian currently provides 15% of available jobs in Ada County, or 29,013, with Boise providing 139,883 of 7-1 192,679 jobs. Meridian seeks to improve and diversify its housing inventory, create strong and sustainable jobs, improve infrastructure, and support diversified modes of transportation. 7.3. JURISDICTION -SPECIFIC NATURAL HAZARD EVENT HISTORY Table 7-1 lists all past occurrences of natural hazards in the county. Repetitive loss records are as follows: • Number of FEMA Identified Repetitive Flood Loss Properties: None • Number of Repetitive Flood Loss Properties that have been mitigated: Not Applicable 7.4. HAZARD RISK RANKING Table 7-2 presents the ranking of the hazards of concern. 7.5. CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT The assessment of the jurisdiction's legal and regulatory capabilities is presented in Table 7-3. The assessment of the jurisdiction's administrative and technical capabilities is presented in Table 7-4. The assessment of the jurisdiction's fiscal capabilities is presented in Table 7-5. Classifications under various community mitigation programs are presented in Table 7-6. 7.6. HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN AND EVALUATION OF RECOMMENDED INITIATIVES Table 7-7 lists the initiatives that make up the jurisdiction's hazard mitigation plan. Table 7-8 identifies the priority for each initiative. Table 7-9 summarizes the mitigation initiatives by hazard of concern and the six mitigation types. 7.7. STATUS OF PREVIOUS PLAN INITIATIVES Table 7-10 summarizes the current status of initiatives that were adopted by the County for the previous hazard plan. Those that are directly carried over as actions in this hazard plan are also indicated as such in Table 7-7. 7.8. FUTURE NEEDS TO BETTER UNDERSTAND RISKIVULNERABILITY The City of Meridian is traversed and served by 2 major canal networks. The New York Canal carries up to 2400 cubic feet per second and the Ridenbaugh Canal conveys up to 600 cubic feet per second through the City. Both canals are situated on ground higher than most of the community and intersect the City's natural creeks which are also used and maintained as drains by the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District. There is no record of historic failures of either of these canals affecting Meridian; however, a catastrophic failure would be a significant event. The calculated peak discharge for the 100 year flood in Tenmile Creek is about 400 cubic feet per second. A failure of either canal in the Tenmile Creek basin would provide opportunity to exceed that flow by several times. The City of Meridian currently has no assessment of the vulnerability of flooding or effect of flooding from a canal breech. Such an assessment should be done, preferably in cooperation with the entities (Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District and Boise Project Board of Control) that manage these facilities. 7-2 ...7. CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEX Additionally, data is needed on the following hazards to have a better understanding on risk within the planning area: • Earthquake—NEHRP soils data as well as USGS "shake maps" for scenario events most likely to impact the planning area. • Landslide—Soils data for landslide susceptibility Analysis. • Wildfire—Enhanced wildfire mapping that will better support risk ranking and the measurement of risk reduction activities. Mapping similar to California's Fire and Resource Assessment Program (FRAP). • Flood—A consistent data set on flood risk that is both publically and politically supported that accurately reflects the true flood risk is desperately needed within the planning area. 7.9. HAZARD AREA EXTENT AND LOCATION Hazard area extent and location maps for the City of Meridian are included at the end of this chapter. These maps are based on the best available data at the time of the preparation of this plan, and are considered to be adequate for planning purposes. 7-3 TABLE 7-1. NATURAL HAZARD EVENTS Type of Event Date Preliminary Damage Assessment Thunderstorm/Wind 8/21/2010 N/A Thunderstorm/Wind 6/4/2010 N/A Thunderstorm/Wind ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7/22/2008 N/A Thunderstorm/Wind 7/4/2006 N/A Thunderstorm/Wind 1/30/2004 N/A Thunderstorm/Wind 7/25/2002 N/A Thunderstorm/Wind --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8/13/1996 N/A Hail 7/6/1995 ' N/A Hail 6/16/1995 N/A Thunderstorm/Wind 4/27/1995 N/A 7-3 7-4 TABLE 7-2. HAZARD RISK RANKING Rank Hazard Type Risk Rating Score(Probability x Impact) 1 ------ Severe Weather -- - - - - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (3x12)=36 -2 - -------Earthquake (2x12)=24 - - ------------------------------ 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flood (3x6)=18 4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wildfire (3x6)=18 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Landslide (1x6)=6 -6 -Volcano----------------------------------------------- 1x6)=6 - ------------------------------- -7-------------------- Drought------------------------------------------------ (2x1)=2 ------------- 8 Dam Failure (1x0)=0 7-4 TABLE 7-3. LEGAL AND REGULATORY CAPABILITY State or Other Local Federal Jurisdictional State Authority Prohibitions Authority Mandated Comments Codes, Ordinances & Requirements Building Code Yes No No No Adopted 2009 IBC January 2011, Ordinance 11-1472 Zonings - — -- -Yes No No No —City Code Title l l Chapter 2 - ----------- Subdivisions Yes No No No City Code Title I 1 Chapter_6_____________ Stormwater Management Yes Yes Yes Yes ACHD holds NPDES Permit. City is responsible for Stormwater Pollution Prevention associated -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - with -City -Projects ------------------------------- Post Disaster Recovery No No No No Real Estate Disclosure No No No No Growth Management Yes No No No October 2010 Comprehensive plan adopted by resolution #11-784 on ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4/19/2011. ------------------------------------------------------------ Site Plan Review Yes No Yes No City Planning, Public Works, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District Settlers Irrigation District Special Purpose (flood Yes No No No NFIP Participating Community, management, critical areas) City Code Section 10 Chapter 6 Planning Documents Comprehensive Plan Yes No No No October 2010 Comprehensive plan adopted by resolution #11-784 on 4/ 19/2011. Floodplain or Basin Plan -N° -N°---------------No -----------------No 7-4 ...7. CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEX TABLE 7-3. LEGAL AND REGULATORY CAPABILITY No State or Other No No Local Federal Jurisdictional State No Authority Prohibitions Authority Mandated Comments Stormwater Plan No No No - - No Capital Improvement Plan Yes No No No 5 -Year CIP for water, sewer and Strategic plan presented to City reclaimed water utilities. Updated annually. Last update to cover 2012 Council and public record on thru 2016. Habitat Conservation Plan No No No No Economic Development Plan Yes No No No Updated 2010-2012. Mayor's Office of Economic Excellence. Strategic plan presented to City Council and public record on October 12, 2010 Emergency Response Plan Yes No No No ACCEM: Ada County Flood Response Plan. Adopted: January, 2006 Ada County Mass Casualty Incident Plan. Adopted: 12/16/2010 Ada County HAZMAT Response Plan. Adopted: April 2011 Ada County Wildfire Response Plan_ Adopted_ May 2010 Shoreline Mannjement Plan No No No No Post Disaster Recovery Plan No No No No UP TABLET{. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY g1aR/Personnel Resources Available? Ih anmen/A enc /Position Plannem or engineers with know ledge of land Yes Planning Oeustria t employs several qualified plasters, developmemane.land management practices ..------------------------------------- - es _. ___- Engineers ssionals haioN in M1uilJing Yea Public Works Ceparlm qualified Engineer; m infmstrul trvmiolca oriineers auris Plan OvelopnenlA Plan Revlewen untl [tors__ Pleasure or engineers with an understanding Yen Planning and Public Works of Robins[ hamNe Withhold Public Expenditurein Haeattl-Penne Areas ........... ... _ Yee Sm_R wilhirrainingin be efiV t analysis ___Y Public We Floadpl_ gL_____ ___,__Y Other CendeJ PlwMPln Mmstee' Public Wods Sorcerous --------------— statstat__ _ No ___stat stat — - —stat _este_— _ Personnel skilled or trained in G19 Yes Public Works a3pi_eaF_ ... .... _.......... .stat. stat_. Sciesist Smaller with naturesrnlM1verds in laal No use Ernest yager_____ .p est__Y Fre R co_ step... Grant writers Yes Planning TABLETS. FISCALCAPASILITY Aceeesible or Financial Raoorces Eli 'blero use? Yu Capital Improvements Passed Funding y Authority to Levy Fewer for specific Purpous Yee. User Fees for Wahq Sewer Gas of Electric Sets ice Yates _ Incur Debt luough General Obligation Bonds-- -stat_"_._._._._._._._._._.___. Incur Debt through Special Tax Bonds No [new Deb[through Prvvabd sidlAily-Bonds No Withhold Public Expenditurein Haeattl-Penne Areas ........... ... _ Yee Gt Progv-ns State Sponsored! ran _ stat Yes___ Development Impact Fres for Hamsbuyers or Developers yes Other None T -B .7. CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEX TABLE74. COMMUNITY CLASSIFICATIONS ParficipalfivirL Classification Oero Classified Co_mmwity. Ration _ No N/A N/A BUJdagCWe Effecevene Gmd�Sbedul ._ Yes_ _ 10/10 _ N/A Public Protection __ _ _ _ _ Yes _ ISO Class 3_ 30W SaahrmRagy .....____ Yes Blue WA____ Final No N/A WA TABLET -T. HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN MATRIX Appwasto Included new or in existing Hal Objectives Lead Estimated Soured of Enhance sots MIE ted Met Agency Cost Funding Timeline Nunn atlative MM-1—Conduct aaurny ofweter, sewer, fire, and poli" infissbucnue including power gmeretion equipment wastewater comment plant Facilities, commumications, and Supervisory (Natural aW Data Acquisition (SCALA) equipment to anal vuUerability m severe washer and origin l Jen design and ettuse improvement to margins.. Existing Severe Social 1,2,3,10 CIA Medium Enterprise Short Icrm No linnbquake Fund, General Fund ImiHvtlrepat-3—Become a"P itewiu Community". New and Wildiand Fire 2,4.5.6,8 City Low GeneralFund Shoff l'e m No I elsun Initiative MM-3—Mantain compliance had goad sanding in the Normal Flood Insurwce Progrem. New and Flowl 1,2105,6.8 City Low General Fund, ShenTew Yes Lxhhlm So nuc Water Ongoing 8.Lg L11N 6nnd Eightive NMI —Apply for pectimpation in Jas Community Rating SS'stem(CRS) hard Maimain Sanding Far CRS. New and Flood 1,2,4,5,6,7, City Low General Fund, Short Iam. No hxisting 8 Surface Water Ongoing Lou Fund InRivtlre Y,[. Cosidergas "eetion of a ranges voter mility. New and Floo,Sl 1,2,4,5.6,8, City law General Fund, ShortTerm No F'ohmar Weather 111 Surface Water Ongoing Utility Fwd Initiative pat-6—Levelop awmpreMtuive surtece water prolocriw pagan, Including a stermwater management Plan Now and Flood, Smvm 1,2,3,10 City Med Surface Water Short Tew, NO Existing WcAor Utility Fund Long Tam, Ongoing 77 TABLE 1-T. HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN MATRIX Applleslo Included ones or in existing Ilnmrds Oblcetives Levl Estimated Sources of Previous assets Mi( rred Met Agonies Cost Funding I meiue Plon? Tentative Oft Partner with ACHD b implement a thwart mplaament program for approximately 15 esings ofFivemile, Nimmile, and Temple Curtis; including design and compression. Existing Flood, ensure 1,2 ACED, Illgh Surface Water LongTerm No Weather Clry Thility Pund, FEMA PUN or I Poll Grants Initiative Ni Paruler with Idaho Trampurtelion Department (ED) to design end minsruct entrant improvement; on Fivent Creek at the l-861 Eagle Rood lntemM1enge smanding to recnmmendntioner of "Flvemlle Cheek at Inn mrme 84 --Eagle Rued to Walls Sheat" HydmWic Repon, November 2008. E.eitting Flood, Severe L2 City High SurfaceWater Short 'Iearn No Weather uhurypund, or Long IID Funding, Term PI MA PDM or IIMGPGmnB. Initiative a vulnerability azazsrement on the Ridmbnuyh vW New Yoh Ceml system in the Mendhn Am of lmpxt Existing Flood, L2 (It, Mail Surface Water 1hotlTetm No EanM1 cake _ UtHILY Fund Initiative NM-10—Perform an assessment to determine housing areas unit would benefit from foundation elevation proleXa Wanda with homeowners to apply for grant funding for pmlectc Existing Flood 3.89 City Low Surfaeu Walur SM1onTerm No Unity Fund or Long form Ioigative 0111-11—Intagrate Lam] Haurd Mitigation Plan into the City ofMeddiau's CompreMnsive Plain New unit All Imeards 25.6 Meridien la" General Fund Next No Existing Planning available Dom inside to Crimp Plan Initiative#M-12—Comider appropriate higher regulmmy standards hat prevent Or resume all to the built improve from the knowimprovewne of . No" =it All Hazards 46 Meridian Low General Fund Long Term No Existing Planning Dept, 78 .J, CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEX TABLE T -T. HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN MATRIX Applies to Included new in existing Hazards ObjeGives Lead Estimated Sources of Previous assets Margaret Met ApeneZ ApeCwt Funding Timeline Plane Intllaflve ill Where appropriate, support retMfitting, pmcimx, or relocation ofanuchues nMted in hamrd-prone areas to protect structures from future damage, witM1 properties with a mm W repetilive ]MRS as a priority. Exisling Allhazards 3.$9 Meridian high FEMA Hnmrd InngTerm No Building Mitigation Deus on Dep. Burn, with funding preperty owner contribution for local match Initiative WiNli--Sppon County -wide initial identified in Volmm 1. New and All Harnrds All Ciq Low General fund Shon'I'am', No Emainz Ongoing In WfivepM-I Cominuemmppan IM'unplemenmtion, monitarLtg, mainrormce,eW updating ofd'm Flan, M mr ed m Volume t. New& All Ilasms All ACCEM, Low General Fund, Shoo Term, No Existing Meridian FEMA Ongoing Maigmlon Grant Funding for 5 -year dare Wi -10 TABLE TB. MITIGATION STRATEGY PRIORITY SCHEDULE eof Do Renefits ISPhi Can Project He Funded Initiative Objectives Equal or Grant- Under Booing M Met Hearts Com ExwMCosts? EI' i ProramsBudgets I Poll 0 M_-1 CHigh M¢diu_m__ Yes Yp No __MeG_u_m_ M 2 5 _ H gM1 Medmm__ Y No _ _ No Medium M l 6 High Low Y No Yes _ - _ HBh,_. ..._ M 4 ) I gl L w ..._.___ Y _ No _ Yes --___High __. _ _M_ 5 ) II M1 _ g L _ _ Y . o Yes Hi&t M6 4 _IIgM1 Hg11 Y No Nc�- High, _M ] 2 High Hi@ ,-- Y _-_ Yes No _ High_ of 8— _ Igh _.._ Nom Y _._._. You No H.P%'. M_9 2 . _. Med Medium —__ Y - Yw .__._ No _ _ ......_. H _M-10 ] _ _ 11 gM1 _- Lo _ Y --__No_ _Y --- . ....._ ...._.. _._Mull l High Low Yes Yes_ High _ M-12 --- 1 _Hi&M1_____ Inw___ Yes _ NO ._. Yes Mi ------. --m-13— 3 _ High High ___ Y YenNo Metlium 4-I4 10 _flgM1 Low Y _ . —.--No Yes- _ High._ M-15 10 high Low Yes Yen Yes High a. Sec Scwmn Ennrtlieferena ,lme lot found.Ibrvle6ntiomofhlah, n¢&um and low Pm ma. -10 ..J CITY OF MERIOIANANNEX TABLE T -S. ANALYSIS OF MITIGATION INITIATNES Initiative Addressing Han d, by Mitigation Type 3. Public e, Natural 6. 1. 2, Property Education and Resource 5. Emirgetcy Structural Hamra ape Preveation Protected Awareness Protection Services Pro'cols DBI. Failure N/A N/A NIA WA NIA WA Drought M-I1.M-12, M-13 M -N Id -11 M -IS Eufiquak M -I, MA m-% M-13 M -IC M II M-1 M-II,ad- ----------- - _ _ _ _ 1211,-15._.. _..._...._._ �...- M - Flood 1,3 M-0 3 M<,M-S,.M 1,3 M -0,M MS M II M -M "1,5, M4, 1,5 M4 Ml 1,8-13 M S,MiiG M-0,10 M-7, M-9, 10 M -I3 "' 1,-10 M 9 1,-111 M 11, M 12 M -IS Landal . 1,11 M-10 M 13 Ml M II Sive W alh M-1, M4 M-1, M-13 Mil mil M-16 ' M-1, M-5, al 1,4,M-0, eM_IS M -g —_ -'-'12 _____ — __ —. Wildfire M-2,1,-11, Mi M -2, M.14 M - II M M-13, M -IS 1. Pmmtion', 6111,, nl, neminist, ivnoemgulnlmy upon that adds,... J ,x L dmdbuildingemeeeeeloludtort&es, M1vmd Iossa Includmplen.i i mi xmdplvn fall, upiW implovpnem prog^^4 oPm same prettrvmioq and 2. Pmprty RottGon: Motli(almn ofbuiNingao bprdtecl tM1em!1111 eavarem vol ofsW res, (1111.. AnmN ars fi,dhah, "i clevabon, mimbomq Sndi rei..11111 shulRt; end sturte,mommtdue, 3. Public ldua and A s: Ani infm,n and slowed oRciale 1,111 bawds and wgvi N mitiga¢ fled, boilers amed Impose,n emere Aided, hamed IIIIfim, recro, and scho.l.an, mdlint Muret G, Neural Planar, Pmkn n: Accord not mcninfinhvmd loss and earn, 1 11 IntiPit tun sof Ideal ry1= Iwiudea#dlment and erosion conWl, crown, wmdm ecessation, mbershed menegmeot fomalmd vegeuton mmngmen4 add wrlmd es, and proutev. 5. Insurgency sery com,Amon, tw period Wolf and property during and imminently doer a,..1111 marl. mendel..amer chum ,,,ormeymepl.a and Pit p do ofed tial faction 6. gar' wdt.i Paul MM .1 thatrvohe thea 1.Ofdaori w recur' me imp.. If a bi lncwdea eama, wtbmk 1e.eeA old is, comm".mx and safe rounno TABLE 7-10. PREVIOUS ACTION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION STATUS A.Ln% _.__ _ _ TM1ls is now oddassea.by Objective q8 __�_ X _ . ..... _ This now add ssed b�Objecu qb_—_._._.. _81 X______ Th nowaddessediJective q5 BI d X Th rsnow add essad by Objaeve q2 A.I. X ..._._.. --mis isoow add sed by_Objecl' Xb. hit X._. . _ This is -now addressed by Objenive p5.____ 8. Ig_ X —This Is vow addictedby action item AC Alh X I his notiond of apply to the C ly 8 I X This be mien over for inview by ninmotion developl planning most development services and its putpor furbirdon is now addressed by Ojectves5an< 8.13 _. This action is now addsessM by plan mamkilaice 82a % Red Cross Shelter sites are not owned by the _- __- - ____----------- comity........ ----- _-------------- 8.1s X All Ada County Nsidens aro encouraged to awn NOAA radios as pan of their personal all haeaN preparedness. This information is included in all public presentations, the website and appears 82.e X The revised format of the pian update provides for imvrable actions that can be Nominated and plemented at an individual jurisdiction or district 826 % ""' The process of this evaluation is ongoing as is the nation of mitigation metegim based on the most cent dam. "is objective was sour en with multiple actlorm that may not all be implemented at once. Its concert and puryase art now covered by Objectives ________ ------------ 2,3,4,5 andb_. __ 82M1 A (Well lntait o This infrastructure is not County prfic - it will the attracted Jmb'sdhpi onal murex. _ 82 ____ __ _ ___ _ _ TM1' action is now covered by Ob,�ct e3 713 83g x This action will M addmsxd in Me appropriate TABLE 7.10. PREVIOUS ACTION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION STATUS Action Hiatus 8? M1 % this action will M addressed in the appropriate CanvOverto Removed;N0 Action# Completed Plunlludwe Lon a I cedes Comments 82J % Mora random early warning systems are Ming ____ ____ Uisiri_ct_Planning ParNers __ _ _ _ .. ._ __. _ 'urvutigamd that will capitalize on current available Hqk X This action will MndtlressM in Ne appropriate tmhnolopJes. _ _......__._.__. _ HT X Tins is now addressed by Objabve 43_ 831, _ X I [its is now addressed bby�Ob'a[ive p2 H 3 C _ _ 1 hwisnow, add sal bKOb.xtive #2 R.1c % hestacontains momb.en dee eTF2 --and-10 nieardiosmmwe complained an nw ObLnes 84.b % this action willb adtlmssd in the appropriate 2 need i10 ___ addressed by_ 8.9.e x This action will be addressed In lbe agrooate 713 83g x This action will M addmsxd in Me appropriate _. _..___ J nadichonal annex (ACHDi 8? M1 % this action will M addressed in the appropriate ___ _ ........... _... J 'saiGio (ACHD� ._._. __ .... BJj X Action iscumllFAM viable. Requires lrtigal tan ____ ____ Uisiri_ct_Planning ParNers __ _ _ _ .. ._ __. _ Hqk X This action will MndtlressM in Ne appropriate ft.a.e X (memories will oast into other projects ebeicy. thatimproves S of addrsused byO improvements are now addrmsed by Objectives I are now --and-10 84.b % this action willb adtlmssd in the appropriate _ J sdlaio I (Kinn)_--------------- __._... RJ.c X Completed—ACHD has pled Opinion on signals for Responders [o control Meta .Pus h anchor City has an evacuallon plea along with the vonha ev plan ow plan _ SAA._ z msis now aaare.:9edayobjednepm by ACRD and dins BAn X lhis ka basic addressp!in not need to be addressed in NC Midgmtkin Plan the Fire Mitigation Activities 5.1a x Ongoing activity that is now addressed by Objective 6. 51b X This is now andilmosed by Objective M6 Slc X Th 'sm ddrevai by ObjxGve pfi 713 TABLE740. PREVIOUS ACTION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION STATUS Action slaws CarryOverlo Rbnwed;No Aclionn Com lend PlanUpdate Licargerfreasible Comments 5. A X Ordinance 4760 bans fireworks in the threatened area_s_o_fthe_w_i_nw retMConn _ .._...._._._.w 5.2m .a X soildOsteering Cpmmiaaeisn in Comprised solely ofjurisdidltlireminvoIn (refighting f ties.... .... 5.2.6 X Ongoing activity for is mwatltlressed by Objective 8. 52r X I his activity will be addraosedin the annexes of ........... __._........_..__................... _... TPProprirceae 52d X This activity will beadtions. in Ne armexes of ._._._._.. ____._.__._.. appropriate acts will tlglow. 5.2.e X appropriate will beatldresudin [he means of —_ — — 5.2.f X This aztiviry will be Mdresutl in the compact; of ____ PP opriala f A L'C "s:__. — — 5.2g X This activity will be addressed in Use annexes of ---- _-------- PPrapr_ete fire jurridi3ioni 52.11 X This activity will h acerwind In Ne CiV of Boise 52 X P uatlon plan mplem. Public outreach is gngoingand is now Mdrestrab�O65 a_ e 521 X IThISaCtiViVWIIIb Ma d'ath f app 52k X, .,71M1is ar[viry will be addressed in the annexes of --------- ____ __ eprupriater yin _done _............. s3. x __ m aativiry addressed by Objective 7._ _..._..53b_._._ X ______ Tb' tvity _ addressed by ObT t 9._ 53 c _---- .__---- X ---------- T'hisactivii is now.addresped by Objective 9. _ S.l.d % This aovgoingactiviry regulated by Coon Ordinance p)69. 53 X flux is an ongoing act'ry that involves multiple r],en!I3 rind itions and disnlctc Its purpose and Intent a mW'" Y now atldressetl by Objectives 5 aM 9 _ ......_._ ._._._. ____ _ _._... 5.3.f X This activity is a response action and will be addresses] by the jurisdiction in EmeBency ___ _ _ _ _ —opecamans Plans _Sig _ _ X __ __ Th's aaivi_ty' Mtlre _tl_by Obs t e5 53M1 X Th activitywillb radamossecl in the ACRD annex 7-14 TABLE 7-10. PREVIOUS ACTION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION STATUS 5.4.1b X This activity is new addressed by Objectives 8 acid 9. ----------------------------- 54c X This activity is now addressed by Objectives 8 and 54d X Ihis activitywll be addressed in date annex of ......... ___......................appropriate _Fine 54c % This activity will be addressed In the ammx of appropriate 0rchuradictlon._ 54.f A IM1'aemlwry will heightening in tied atwxo[ ___..... ....__appropriate 0rcymiatlictlon. 5.4.g % This activity will be addressed in the annex of _____ _appropriate li sd¢uon 5.4.h X This activity will be addressed in the annex of ppropriamfre2unsd coon 54.1 % This activity will be addressed in the annex of ^ppropiiatejunsd lion 5 j X Thisna ivory will he addressed in the annex of ............_Pp_Priatejunsd ctlon _ 5.4.k X This activity is being removed from the Mitigation Plan as it is adores[ function of the Intempereble Communications Initiatives being funded dwugh BITS. 11 5.41 % This activity bang ronoved from the Mitigation Plan as. it is a direct function of the Interoperable Communications Initiatives being funded! m thugh IBI IS. 54m X This activity will be addressed by die policies of the Ire jurinfictions that have volunteer staff. 54n X ACCEM creardinall with all local resparee agencies to create multi-year training plans. Training fonds are available through ACCEM or directly __._____ through lB IS.AeR ing_the scope.. ____ 55 _ _____ X ____ I hisacavityis nowashchressexpLOblechwi 5 s X [his activity is now addressed by Objectives and 9. 55 X Ih activity is now adelmssM 1y ObycI 8.. 550 X __ IM1sactivry address Oby blechw 5. _ 5 5 X _ ____ _____ Ihisaaiv try snow eddresscd by ob'<nive 9. TABLET -10. PREVIOUS ACTION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION STATUS Action Status Call Over to Removed; No Anions Completes] Plan U Owe Lon rPeal Comments scI X Tlds is a positron tbatwill be implemented by the Bureeuofl dM g_ enonanaeneededbazis gs.A Su afLe that will bcina tedbythe __ t B aft dM g to_v defib is >>b X Th ivi claddressed by Objective 9 T-16 D � K W X 3 as 3� V �: S3ms w f + nip Pow, e - v Lui , 1. sjr./7 -SjI�-",,d `�' Ll ❑I�'.'T^P- �". 3 ° zc� � Jlf�l a23 3e r a �!)!I (§f§2{ �� }( _ gnat[[ { u d \: /\,\ « ! j/. 7:1 ( * ~ ~�©~� \� OV z \ ' aru \,k.= m ` [ !� |■ a ■ /! �[ !1 - � ALJJob 2z � � ~,a6}�- M \ >p .y 4_. :v(>C>, ~ ƒ \� , __`}a 2 _ ` �\� .�`� (� �•`k� � � ( } \`�` \)\)) \ ! )la \ l poil\ / � \�\ Tn3N r ; 2 /Ott °\ -j �2 �� < zJ \U �\ \ -- i /)H, / Aga / [�k [ \ Hi )�7 ®E -j ,[1-j C. �( _ A J )l�� !g§Q!Q! ))% [ J ® !s ) [ !2 � ■ s !� � � 2 ~ � \ S �\ �j ! . a �SS , 40 mop %j -1 � � !| • !� !! ��[[�)Q ( \)■■ ■ � ).« ,75 \ % \ :g 1 2 \ �. a X u s• cW Ua �e �a ' g • $�3 'nn s,:n RqRs ns P4, � o Q xEA a x i cwc G C d c a € 6 v r tT—V` °da�,��7�°�r dm° r .I.y.I.s ..�. .g, li CKI d L a 'W a� ^r < f of , Z d Q E �� 2 K x o a FS 3 Wc X u m - & w g a � e O LL � �� a � E � � s aha �e o ° a� Y �e Sp U rc rc # • ��m% }t - -h