Agency Comments~~~~,
Date: November 9, 2011
To: Dexter King (sent via email)
1195 W. Overland Road
Meridian, ID 83642
Subject: MAZ-11-003
1195 W. Overland Road
Rebecca W. Amold, President
John S. Franden, Vice President
Carol A. McKee, Commissioner
Sara M. Baker, Commissioner
David L. Case, Commissioner
On November 9, 2011 the Ada County Highway District Staff acted on your application for the
above referenced project. The attached report lists site-specific requirements, conditions of
approval and street improvements, which are required.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (208) 387-6174.
Sincerely,
~~
Jarom Wagoner
Planner II
Development Services
Ada County Highway District
CC: Project file
City of Meridian (sent via email)
Ada County Highway District • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 208-387-6100 • FX 345-7650 • www.achdidaho.org
Development Services Department
7~~~3
~-'
co,~t~~xo ~:~
Project/File: MAZ-11-003
This application is for annexation and rezone of approximately 7.6 acres from RUT
(Rural-Urban Transition) to R-8 (Medium-Density Residential). The site is located at
1195 W. Overland Road in Meridian, Idaho.
Lead Agency: City of Meridian
Site address: 1195 W. Overland Road
Staff Approval: November 9, 2011
Applicant: Dexter King
1195 W. Overland Road
Meridian, ID 83642
Staff Contact: Jarom Wagoner
Phone: 387-6174
E-mail: jwagoner .achdidaho.org
Tech Review: November 9, 2011
A. Findings of Fact
1. Description of Application: The applicant is requesting to annex and rezone the site from RUT
(Rural-Urban Transition) to R-8 (Medium-Density Residential). The property is 7.6 acres and
currently has asingle-family residence.
2. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area:
Direction Land Use Zonin
North General Retail & Service Commercial District C-G
South Rural-Urban Transition Zone RUT
East Rural-Urban Transition Zone RUT
West Rural-Urban Transition Zone RUT
3. Site History: ACHD has not previously reviewed this site for a development application.
4. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any
building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in
effect at that time.
5. Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)/Five Year Work Plan (FYWP):
There are currently no roadways, bridges or intersections in the general vicinity of the project that
are currently in the Five Year Work Program or the District's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).
2 MAZ-11-003
B. Traffic Findings for Consideration
1. Trip Generation: This development is estimated to not generate any additional trips, as the use
currently exists.
2. Condition of Area Roadways
Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour (VPH)
PM Peak PM Peak Existing
Roadway Frontage Functional
Classification Hour Hour Level Plus
'
Traffic Count of Service Pro
ect
Overland
320-feet Principal
432 Better than
"
" Better
"
"
Road Arterial D than
D
*Acceptable level of service for afive-lane principal arterial is "E" (1,770 VPH).
3. Average Daily Traffic Count (VDT)
Average daily traffic counts are based on ACHD's most current traffic counts.
The average daily traffic count for Overland Road east of Linder Road was 4,705 on
January 13, 2010.
C. Findings for Consideration
This application is for a rezone application only. Listed below are some of the findings for consideration
that the District may identify when it reviews a future development application. The District may add
additional findings for consideration when it reviews a specific redevelopment application.
1. Overland Road
a. Existing Conditions: Overland Road is
and 7-foot wide sidewalk abutting the site.
(48-feet from centerline).
improved with 5-travel lanes, vertical curb, gutter,
There is 96-feet of right-of-way for Overland Road
b. Policy:
Arterial Roadway Policy: District Policy 7205.2.1 states that the developer is responsible for
improving all street frontages adjacent to the site regardless of whether or not access is taken
to all of the adjacent streets.
Master Street Map and Typology Policy: District Policy 7205.5 states that the design of
improvements for arterials shall be in accordance with District standards, including the Master
Street Map and Livable Streets Design Guide. The developer or engineer should contact the
District before starting any design.
Street Section and Right-of-Way Width: District Policies 7205.2.1 & 7205.5.1 state that the
standard 5-lane street section shall be 72-feet (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) within 96-feet of
right-of-way. This width typically accommodates two travel lanes in each direction, a
continuous center left-turn lane, and bike lanes on a minor arterial and a safety shoulder on a
principal arterial.
Sidewalk Policy: District Policy 7205.5.7 requires a concrete sidewalks at least 5-feet wide to
be constructed on both sides of all arterial streets. A parkway strip at least 6-feet wide
between the back-of-curb and street edge of the sidewalk is required to provide increased
safety and protection of pedestrians. Consult the District's planter width policy if trees are to
be placed within the parkway strip. Sidewalks constructed next to the back-of-curb shall be a
minimum of 7-feet wide.
Detached sidewalks are encouraged and should be parallel to the adjacent roadway.
Meandering sidewalks are discouraged.
3 MAZ-11-003
Appropriate easements shall be provided if public sidewalks are placed out of the right-of-way.
The easement shall encompass the entire area between the right-of-way line and 2-feet
behind the back edge of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall either be located wholly within the
public right-of-way or wholly within an easement.).
Minor Improvements Policy: District Policy 7203.3 states that minor improvements to
existing streets adjacent to a proposed development may be required. These improvements
are to correct deficiencies or replace deteriorated facilities. Included are sidewalk construction
or replacement; curb and gutter construction or replacement; replacement of unused
driveways with curb, gutter and sidewalk; installation or reconstruction of pedestrian ramps;
pavement repairs; signs; traffic control devices; and other similar items.
ACHD Master Street Map: ACHD Policy Section 3111.1 requires the Master Street Map
(MSM) guide the right-of-way acquisition, arterial street requirements, and specific roadway
features required through development. This segment of Overland Road is designated in the
MSM as a Planned Commercial Arterial with 5-lanes and on-street bike lanes, an 82-foot
street section within 108-feet of right-of-way.
c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is not proposing any improvements to Overland Road.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: Overland Road was recently improved to 5-lanes with
on-street bike lanes, vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk; therefore no additional street
improvement should be required, with this application.
Consistent with the MSM the applicant should be required to dedicate 54-feet of right-of-way
from the centerline of Overland Road, abutting the site.
2. Driveways
2.1 Overland Road
a. Existing Conditions: There are two driveways on Overland Road, abutting the site. They are
located as follows:
• 23-foot wide driveway located approximately 1,050-feet west of the intersection of
Overland Road and Stoddard Road (measured centerline-to-centerline).
• 12-foot wide driveway located approximately 1,320-feet west of the intersection of
Overland Road and Stoddard Road (measured centerline-to-centerline).
b. Policy
Access Points Policy: District Policy 7205.4.1 states that all access points associated with
development applications shall be determined in accordance with the policies in this section
and Section 7202. Access points shall be reviewed only for a development application that is
being considered by the lead land use agency. Approved access points may be relocated
and/or restricted in the future if the land use intensifies, changes, or the property redevelops.
Access Policy: District Policy 7205.4.7 states that direct access to principal arterials is
typically prohibited. If a properly has frontage on more than one street, access shall be taken
from the street having the lesser functional classification. If it is necessary to take access to
the higher classified street due to a lack of frontage, the minimum allowable spacing shall be
based on Table 1 b under District Policy 7205.4.7, unless a waiver for the access point has
been approved by the District Commission. Driveways, when approved on a principal arterial
shall operate as a right-in/right-out only, and the District will require the construction of a
raised median to restrict the left turning movements.
Driveway Location Policy: District Policy 7205.4.7 requires driveways located on principal
arterial roadways to be located a minimum of 355-feet from the nearest intersection for aright-
in/right-out only driveway. Full-access driveways are not allowed on principal arterial
roadways.
4 MAZ-11-003
Successive Driveways Policy: District Policy 7205.4.7 Table 1 b, requires driveways located
on principal arterial roadways with a speed limit of 45 MPH to align or offset a minimum of
450-feet from any existing or proposed driveway.
Driveway Width Policy: District Policy 7205.4.8 restricts high-volume driveways (100 VTD or
more) to a maximum width of 36-feet and low-volume driveways (less than 100 VTD) to a
maximum width of 30-feet. Curb return type driveways with 30-foot radii will be required for
high-volume driveways with 100 VTD or more. Curb return type driveways with 15-foot radii
will be required for low-volume driveways with less than 100 VTD.
Driveway Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance
problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy,
7205.4.8, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-
feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers in
accordance with Table 2 under District Policy 7205.4.8.
Cross Access Easements/Shared Access Policy: District Policy 7202.4.1 states that cross
access utilizes a single vehicular connection that serves two or more adjoining lots or parcels
so that the driver does not need to re-enter the public street system.
c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is not proposing any changes to the existing driveways.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal does not meet District
Access Management or Successive Driveway Polices, and should not be approved as
proposed. The 20-foot wide driveway, located approximately 1,050-feet west of the
intersection of Overland Road and Stoddard Road, is a secondary driveway to the site and
offsets the neighboring driveway to the east by approximately 60-feet (measured centerline-to-
centerline). The applicant should be required to replace this driveway with vertical curb,
gutter and sidewalk to match the existing conditions on either side.
The 12-foot wide driveway, located approximately 1,320-feet west of the intersection of
Overland Road and Stoddard Road, does not meet District Successive Driveway Policy as it
offsets the neighboring driveway to the west by approximately 40-feet (measured centerline-
to-centerline); however, staff recommends a modification of policy to allow the driveway to
remain due to the fact that with the closure of the secondary driveway, this driveway will
provide sole access to the site. The applicant should be required to pave the driveway its
entire width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement.
3. Tree Planters
Tree Planter Policy: Tree Planter Policy: The District's Tree Planter Policy prohibits all trees in
planters less than 8-feet in width without the installation of root barriers. Class II trees may be
allowed in planters with a minimum width of 8-feet, and Class I and Class III trees may be allowed
in planters with a minimum width of 10-feet.
4. Landscaping
Landscaping Policy: A license agreement is required for all landscaping proposed within ACHD
right-of-way or easement areas. Trees shall be located no closer than 10-feet from all public
storm drain facilities. Landscaping should be designed to eliminate site obstructions in the vision
triangle at intersections. District Policy 5104.3.1 requires a 40-foot vision triangle and a 3-foot
height restriction on all landscaping located at an uncontrolled intersection and a 50-foot offset
from stop signs. Landscape plans are required with the submittal of civil plans and must meet all
District requirements prior to signature of the final plat and/or approval of the civil plans.
5. Other Access
Overland Road is classified as a principal arterial roadway. Other than the access specifically
approved with this application, direct lot access is prohibited to this roadway.
5 MAZ-11-003
D. Site-Specific Conditions of Approval
This application is for a rezone only. Listed below are site-specific conditions of approval that the
District may require when it reviews a future development application for this site. The District may add
additional site-specific requirements when it reviews a specific re-development application.
1. Dedicate 54-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Overland Road, abutting the site. The right-
of-way purchase and sale agreement and deed must be completed and signed by the applicant
prior to scheduling the final plat for signature by the ACHD Commission or prior to issuance of a
building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days
to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The District will
purchase the right-of-way which is in addition to existing right-of-way from available Corridor
Preservation Funds.
2. Replace the existing 20-foot wide driveway, located approximately 1,050-feet west of the
intersection of Overland Road and Stoddard Road with vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk so as to
match the existing conditions on either side.
3. Payment of impacts are due prior to issuance of a building permit.
4. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
E. Standard Conditions of Approval
1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACHD right-of-way.
2. Private sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within the ACHD right-of-
way.
3. In accordance with District policy, 7203.6, the applicant may be required to update any
existing non-compliant pedestrian improvements abutting the site to meet current Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The applicant's engineer should provide
documentation of ADA compliance to District Development Review staff for review.
4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged
during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at
387-6280 (with file number) for details.
5. A license agreement and compliance with the District's Tree Planter policy is required for all
landscaping proposed within ACHD right-of-way or easement areas.
6. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall
be borne by the developer.
7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way.
The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant.
The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) at least two full business
days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD
Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACRD conduits (spare or filled) are
compromised during any phase of construction.
8. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in
writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file
numbers) for details.
9. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the ACHD Policy Manual, ISPWC
Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable
6 MAZ-11-003
ACHD Standards unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of
Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
10. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements of ACHD prior to District approval for occupancy.
11. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in
writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an
authorized representative of ACHD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain
written confirmation of any change from ACHD.
12. If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACHD Planning Review will review the
site plan and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that time.
Any change in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall
require the applicant to comply with ACHD Policy and Standard Conditions of Approval in
place at that time unless awaiver/variance of the requirements or other legal relief is
granted by the ACHD Commission.
F. Conclusions of Law
1. The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval
are satisfied.
2. ACRD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the
proposed development.
G. Attachments
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site Plan
3. Utility Coordinating Council
4. Development Process Checklist
5. Request for Reconsideration Guidelines
7 MAZ-11-003
MAZ-11-003
Vicinity Map
Site Plan
Dennis King
Annexation Sketch
A PARCEL. OF LANG SITUATE IN THE NORTH HALF OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,
RANGE 1 WEST B015E MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO
589'03'00"E, 316.93'
NOTE
THIS SKETCH WAS PREPARED FROM RECORD OF
SURVEY NUMBER 1515, RECORDS, ADA COUNTY,
IDAHO. A NEW LAND SURVEY WAS NOT PERFORMED,
B&A Engineers, Inc.
co~iu~sn spa gun
ssosw.a,. ~~r:a.e~.ras~
ryoafs~s.~
~4~~
SM
NORTH
SCALE: 1'200'
9 MAZ-11-003
Ada County Utility Coordinating Council
Developer/Local Improvement District
Right of Way Improvements Guideline Request
Purpose: To develop the necessary avenue for proper notification to utilities of local highway
and road improvements, to help the utilities in budgeting and to clarify the already existing process.
1) Notification: Within five (5) working days upon notification of required right of way
improvements by Highway entities, developers shall provide written notification to the affected
utility owners and the Ada County Utility Coordinating Council (UCC). Notification shall include
but not be limited to, project limits, scope of roadway improvements/project, anticipated
construction dates, and any portions critical to the right of way improvements and coordination
of utilities.
2) Plan Review: The developer shall provide the highway entities and all utility owners with
preliminary project plans and schedule a plan review conference. Depending on the scale of
utility improvements, a plan review conference may not be necessary, as determined by the
utility owners. Conference notification shall also be sent to the UCC. During the review meeting
the developer shall notify utilities of the status of right of way/easement acquisition necessary
for their project. At the plan review conference each company shall have the right to appeal,
adjust and/or negotiate with the developer on its own behalf. Each utility shall provide the
developer with a letter of review indicating the costs and time required for relocation of its
facilities. Said letter of review is to be provided within thirty calendar days after the date of the
plan review conference.
3) Revisions: The developer is responsible to provide utilities with any revisions to preliminary
plans. Utilities may request an updated plan review meeting if revisions are made in the
preliminary plans which affect the utility relocation requirements. Utilities shall have thirty days
after receiving the revisions to review and comment thereon.
4) Final Notification: The developer will provide highway entities, utility owners and the UCC with
final notification of its intent to proceed with right of way improvements and include the
anticipated date work will commence. This notification shall indicate that the work to be
performed shall be pursuant to final approved plans by the highway entity. The developer shall
schedule a preconstruction meeting prior to right of way improvements. Utility relocation activity
shall be completed within the times established during the preconstruction meeting, unless
otherwise agreed upon.
Notification to the Ada Counfy UCC can be sent to: 50 S. Cole Rd. Boise 83707, or Visit
iducc.com for a-mail notification information.
10 MAZ-11-003
Development Process Checklist
Items Completed to Date:
®Submit a development application to a City or to Ada County
®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD
®The ACHD Planning Review Section will receive the development application to review
®The Planning Review Section will do one of the following:
^Send a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific conditions of approval at
this time.
®Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and
evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
^Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system
and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
It6t178 #O bB C~l~ ~Y ADDIICi11t:
^For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" letter:
• The applicant should submit one set of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development
Review Section for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements
required by ACHD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee assessment.)
• The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the right-of-
way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts.
^Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval.
DID YOU REMEMBER:
Construction (Non-Subdivisions)
^ Driveway or Property Approach(s)
Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to ACHD Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic
Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval.
^ Working in the ACRD Right-of-Way
• Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit
Application" to ACRD Construction -Permits along with:
a) Traffic Control Plan
b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you
are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt.
Construction (Subdivisions)
^ Sediment & Erosion Submittal
• At least one week prior to setting up aPre-Construction Meeting an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plan,
done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACHD Construction to be reviewed and approved by the ACRD
Stormwater Section.
^ Idaho Power Company
• Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being
scheduled.
^ Final Approval from Development Services is required prior to scheduling aPre-Con.
11 MAZ-11-003
Request for Appeal of Staff Decision
1. Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant
of the final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS
Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts
presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and
capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual.
Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees
to be charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover
administrative costs.
Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal
with the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within
ten (10) working days from the date of the decision that is the
subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision
being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and
telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds
shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy
relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall
include a written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission
shall not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the
provisions of this subsection.
Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days
from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice
of the appeal, and may during such time meet with the appellant to
discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision
that is being appealed. A copy of the reply and any modifications to
the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to
the Commission hearing on the appeal.
Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the
hearing of the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the
Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held within thirty (30)
days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's
reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed,
the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the
Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing.
Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall
either affirm or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend
or supplement the decision being appealed, as such action is
adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at the
hearing.
12 MAZ-11-003
~.
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-463-0092
Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861
SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
1 November 2011
City of Meridian
City Clerk's Office
33 E Broadway Avenue Ste 102
Meridian, ID 83642-2619
RE: AZ 11-003/King Property
Dear Jaycee:
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has 1io comment on the above-referenced application
for Annexation & Zoning ONLY.
All laterals and waste ways must be protected. NMID's Hardin Drain is located on the south
boundary of the property with an easement of sixty feet (60'); thirty feet (30') each side of
centerline. All municipal surface drainage must be retained on-site. If any surface drainage
leaves the site, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must review drainage plans. The
Developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805.
Sincerely,
~~
Gre .Curtis
Water Superintendent
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District
GGC/dbg
C: File/Office
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
Page 1 of 1
Machelle Hill
From: Dave Szplett [Dave.Szplett@itd.idaho.gov]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 1:57 PM
To: clerk
Subject: Re: AZ 11-003 King Annexation
The Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) has reviewed the King Annexation as AZ 11-003.
ITD has no comments on this application. The proposed changes do not directly impact the State
Highway System.
If you have any questions, you may contact Matt Ward at 334-8341 or me at 334-8377.
Sincerely,
Dave SspCett
Access Management Manager-ITD District III
Email: dave.szplett@itd.idaho.~ov
208.334.8377 office
208.949.5683 cell
10/24/2011
CENTRAL CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
•• DISTRICT Retum to:
~RHEALTN Environmental Health Division ^goi~
DEPARTMENT
^ ~9~
Rezone # Z l~ -- ~ ~ ^ Garden City
,,Meridian
Conditional Use # ^~~
Preliminary /Final /Short Plat ^ACZ
w~ ne9 aO,~G ^ Star
We have No Objections to this Proposal.
^2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal.
^3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal.
^4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment.
^5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of:
^ high seasonal ground water ^ waste flow characteristics
^ bedrock from original grade ^ other
^6. This office may require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or
surface waters.
^7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and
water availability.
^8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for:
^ central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well
^ interim sewage ^ central water
^ individual sewage ^ individual water
^9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality:
^ central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water
^ sewage dry lines ^ central water
^10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
^11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other
considerations indicate approval.
^12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State
Sewage Regulations.
^13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any:
^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center
^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store
^ 14. Please see attached stormwater management recommendations
^ 15.
Reviewed By:
Dater/~_/~
Review Sheet
15726-001EH0904