Loading...
Staff ReportSTAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: September 27, 2011 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bill Parsons, Associate City Planner (208) 884-5533 E IDIAN~- IDAHO SUBJECT: MDA-11-008 -Spring Creek Ustick (aka Ashtyn Park) I. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The Applicant, Douglas Clegg, is requesting to terminate the recorded development agreement (instrument #107022433) approved with the Ashtyn Park annexation and the amended development agreement (#1 1 1 00 1 079) approved with the Spring Creek Ustick Assisted Living Facility. The original DA was amended to construct the assisted living facility in lieu of a six (6) building office complex as originally proposed. The facility is now constructed and open and the applicant wishes to terminate both agreements in order to finalize the sale of the property. II. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the application as detailed in Section VIII of the staff report. III. PROPOSED MOTION Approval After considering all Staff, Applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve File Number MDA- 11-008, as presented in Staff Report for the hearing date of September 27, 2011, with the following changes: (insert any changes here). I further move to direct Legal Department Staff to prepare a Development Agreement for this site that reflects the changes noted in Section VIII. Denial After considering all Staff, Applicant, and public testimony, I move to deny File Number MDA-11- 008, as presented during the hearing on September 27, 2011. (You should state why you are denying the request.) Continuance I move to continue File Number MDA-11-008 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (you should state specific reason(s) for continuance) IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location: The site is located on the southwest corner of Ustick Road and Meridian Road in the northeast '/ of Section 1, Township 3 North, Range 1 West B. Owner(s): David and Charlie Price 2291 N. Greenview Court Eagle, ID 83616 C. Applicant/Representative: Doug Clegg 253 E. Calderwood, Suite E Meridian, Idaho 83642 Spring Creek Ustick MDA-11-008 Page 1 D. Applicant's StatementJJustification: Please see applicant's narrative for this information (Exhibit A.4). V. PROCESS FACTS A. The subject application is a request for a development agreement modification. Per Meridian City Code, a public hearing is required before the City Council on this matter. B. Newspaper notifications published on: September 5, and 19, 2011 C. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: September 1, 2011 D. Applicant posted notice on site by: September 16, 2011 VI. LAND USE A. Existing Land Use(s) and Zoning: This site is developed with a 28,100 square foot assisted living facility, zoned L-O. B. Character of Surrounding Area and Adjacent Land Use and Zoning: This site is currently surrounded by a mix of uses that include single family residences, a city park, a developing office complex and a church. North: Settlers Park, zoned L-O East: Single-family residential properties in Eastbrook Village Subdivision and a Single Family Residence, zoned R-8 and R-4 South: Rural Residence, zoned RUT in Ada County West: Church, zoned L-O C. History of Previous Actions: • In 2006, this property was annexed (AZ-06-034) with an L-O zoning district. A development agreement (DA), instrument #107022433, was recorded as a provision of annexation. • In 2010, the applicant received a development agreement modification (MDA-10-006), conditional use permit (CUP-10-004) and certificate of zoning compliance (CZC-10-052) approval to proceed with developing the site with an assisted living facility. The facility is now completed and certificate of occupancy has been issued for the building. • In 2011, the Director issued a determination letter stating that all requirements for developing the assisted living facility have been completed. D. Utilities: 1. Public Works: Location of sewer: Not applicable to this application. Location of water: Not applicable to this application. Issues or concerns: None VII. AGENCY COMMENTS MEETING No other comments were received by the Planning Department for the subject application. VIII. STAFF ANALYSIS The applicant is requesting Council to terminate both development agreements (DA) that govern the property. On September 6`h, the applicant was before Council discussing the options for terminating such agreements (see Exhibit A.2). Council's decided that the termination or modification of the agreements should remain part of the public hearing process as outlined in the UDC and not approved Spring Creek Ustick MDA-11-008 Page 2 administratively. On August 29, 2011, the Director issued a determination letter to assist the applicant on concluding the sale of the property (see Exhibit A.3). The letter was meant to satisfy the lending institution by stating that the applicant had complied all of the provisions in both DA's and stated that a certificate of occupancy (CO) had been issued thus verifying that all applicable conditions approved by the City have been met and remain in effect for the subject property. The letter did not accomplish a satisfactory outcome for the applicant who then decided to proceed with the modification. Staff has reviewed the recorded DA's with the approved CUP and CZC to ensure that any DA provisions that were not codified in the UDC at the time are now in place to govern the development before recommending termination of the DA's. In particular, staff had concerns with recommending termination since the applicant was to provide cross access and sewer connection to the adjacent church property and comply with a specific concept plan and building elevations. Per the requirements of the CUP and CZC, the applicant was to provide recorded sewer maintenance and cross access agreements and comply with the site plan, landscape plan and building elevations as conditioned in the recorded DA's. Further, Staff has a copy of the recorded documents in the file that address cross access and sewer connections between the two properties. Staff is of the opinion that many of the recorded DA provisions are either codified in the UDC or conditioned with the CUP and CZC. The approved CUP Findings, CZC and CO are evidence the project complies with all conditions. For these reasons, staff is supportive of terminating the recorded development agreements as requested by the applicant. However, development agreements are meant to run with the land. This issue encountered by the applicant has lead to a larger discussion on how the City is to proceed with future requests for termination of development agreements. Based on Council's direction, Staff has met to discuss the standard development agreement language contained in the City's template. Because this issue has been raised, the City's Legal Department has agreed to modify the standard DA language so that it clear to future owners/developers that the DA is meant to run (not be terminated) with the land and can be modified at the request of the applicant once provisions are completed to the satisfaction of the City during the public hearing process. IX. EXHIBITS A. Maps/Other 1. Vicinity/Zoning Map -Property Subject to Development Agreement 2. Applicant's Narrative 3. Director's Determination Letter Spring Creek Ustick MDA-11-008 Page 3 Exhibit A.1 -Vicinity/Zoning Map E CASSIDY DR ~ 3 o ~ z a r z E PATAGONIA D ,,~ SITE L-O W USTICK D-- -_-- --E=USTICK=RD-- E ~- C EASTBRQ~lpq CT "~.~:~ oC ~ ~` ~ `~#'P'''~ j{{{ M ~~~,~t r r ~~~i~ i a RUT y,, ~, z s. s ~ ii l ~ ~~ ~:,k ~~, R_4 W SEDGEWICK L-O ;,. s i Spring Creek Ustick MDA-11-008 Page 4 Exhibit A.2 -Applicant's Narrative ~ ~~ Creek _~ ~ INDEPENDENT • ASSISTED WING • ASSISTED LIVING PLUS August 30, 2011 Dear City Council and Mayor: We are requesting that our existing development agreement for the Spring Creek Assisted Living Facility located at 3165 Meridian Road be terminated. This request is in compliance with the language in the development agreement that was previously approved by the city council. Because this project has a certificate of occupancy, is fully compliant as noted in the Directors Determination Letter, and has no additional phases, the need for this development agreement has expired. Commercial loans for projects of this nattue are usually between five and seven years before they mature. Most municipalities including the City of Meridian have changes with staff and elected officials within this time period. There have been instances when these changes, create a different view of the intent of an approved development agreement after a project has been completed. These differing views can vary from the original intent of a development agreement due to a lack of participation in discussions and negotiations that are part of their creation. Because of what has happened recently with many lenders in this market, they along with title officers have become increasingly detailed about underwriting procedures. When a development agreement has language as outs does that grants permission for termination upon completion and compliance, underwriters are seeking termination of these agreements. This termination insures lenders and potential buyers that the project is not only compliant with existing staff and elected officials, but is without risk of misinterpretation with future staff and elected leadership. It is our hope that the City Council will agree that the termination of this development agreement was approved by them when the agreement was entered into before construction of this new facility. This development has completed all the requirements to satisfy this agreement as noted in the Directors Determination. Consequently, it imposes a perceived risk to lenders and potential buyers. We are t~equesting that the city approve the termination of the agreement as previously agreed too. We look forward to discussing this at the next normally scheduled meeting on September 6~h and thank you in advance for your consideration. Reslfully, ~/ Dougl ~ Clegg CEO Spring Creek Idaho surrnu.xmanorcora Ct&braaing SearorA[omniu Spring Creek Ustick MDA-11-008 Page 5 Exhibit A.3 -Director's Determination Letter (~~E IDIZ IAN,- ~J August 29, 2011 Doug Clegg 283 E. Calderwood Unit E Meridian, ID 83642 Mayor Tammy de Weerd Cky Council Members: Keith Bird Brad Hoaglun Charles Rountree David Zaremba ItE: Completion of recorded Development Agreement(DA) #107022433 and Addendum #110078719 Dear Mr. Clegg: This response is to your request for a Director's Determination set forth in your IetOer dated August 23, 2011. Specifically you are requesting the City to verify that you have complied with the original and amended development agrcements approved with the annexation and development of the assisted living facility located at 3165 N. Meridian Road. As indicated in your request, there is a recorded DA and one recorded addendum associated with the subject property. Our records indicate the following two (2) recorded documents: • Instrument #107022433 (original DA) • Instnunent #110078719 (addendum) To summarize your request, the Planning Department has researched the aforementioned documents to determine if any DA provisions have not bcen completed. Provided below is a detailed analysis of the two recorded documents. 1. Ashtm Park Annexation (A.7~06-0341_DA~107022433 The original DA contains sixteen (16) DA provisions that requsre cmnpliance with the following: • a concept plan (# 1); • building elevations (#8); • other related development requirements (#2,3,4,5,6,7,13,14,15 dr 16); • landscape buffers (#9 do # 10) and; • access management(#I1 & 12). After reviewing the sixteen (16) provisions in the original DA, it appears many of the provisions (#2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 & t5) are requirements in the Unified Development Code (i7DC) and would be required with development of the property regardless of the DA. The original concept plan and building elevations (# 16c 8) were requirements of the development agreement have been amended with the DA modification (file #IvIDA-10-006). Planning DeparGnent . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ID 831342 Phone 208-884-5533 . Fax 208-888854 . www.meridiencify.org Spring Creek Ustick MDA-11-008 Page 6 Doug Clegg Page 2 ~. Spring Ustick Develolxnent Agt~xment Modificati~ (bIDA-10-006) # l 10078719 >n 2010, several of the DA provisions approves with the original DA were amended to develop the site with an assisted living facility in lieu of the office park. Specifically, the City Council approved a new concept plan, new building elevations and modified several other provisions that addressed the uses and hours of operation in the I,-O zone, a pressurized irrigation system, and a penmancet sewer easement for the church property to west. The DA modification did not establish the assisted living facility use on the property; that required the procurement of a conditional use permit. In 2010, the property received conditional use permit (CUP-10-004) approval for the assistai living facility. Compliance with the above referenced development agreements were part of the review for the project. The approved CUP Findings for the project is evidence the project compliat with the applicable DA provisions. Other DA provisions required compliance prior to the issuance of a certificate of zoning compliance (CZC) or building occupancy. In 2010, the certificate of zoning compliance (CZC-10-052) was issued by the Planning Department followed by the issuance the certificate of occupancy (CO) to opmate the assisted living facility. 71re issuance of the CO is the final process verifying that all City requirements have been completed. In summary, I have concluded that the project complies wiW all of the DA provisions and conditions of approval associated with the property. Further, the approved CUP and CZC are indicators that the DA provisions are complete as the site is now developed and approved for occupancy. To the best of our knowledge there are no outstanding issues remaining for the property however, the developed properly is still subject to the conditions of approvals associated with the approved CUP and CZC. Future development of this property will have to comply with all city ordinances in effect at the time of development. Spring Creek Ustick MDA-11-008 Page 7