The URL can be used to link to this page

ApplicationMayor Tammy de Weerd City Council Members: E IDIAN~ Keith Bird i+ Brad Hoaglun Charles Rountree IDAHO David Zaremba TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To ensure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall Attn: Jaycee Holman, City Clerk, by: 8-Sep-11 Transmittal Date: August 23, 2011 File No.: RZ 11-004 & PP 11-007 Hearing Date: September 15, 2011 Request:. Public Hearing -Rezone of 1.48 acres of land from the R-8 zoning district to the R-15 zoning district AND Preliminary Plat approval of 148 residential lots and 12 common lots on 28.2 acres in an existing R-8 and a proposed R-15 zone for Chesterfield By: Liberty Development, Inc. Location of Property or Project: south side of W. Pine Avenue; midway between N. Black Cat Road and N. Ten Mile Road Joe Marshall (No FP) Scott Freeman (No FP) Steven Yearsley (No FP) Michael Rohm (No FP> Tom O'Brien (No FP) Tammy de Weerd, Mayor Charlie Rountree, C/C Brad Hoaglun, C/C Keith Bird, C/C David Zaremba C/C Sanitary ServIC2S (No VAR, VAC, FP) Building Department /Rick Jackson Fire Department Police Department City Attorney City Public Works/Scott Steckline City Planner Parks Department Economic Dev. City Engineer Meridian School District (No FP) Meridian Post Office (FP/PP/SHP only> Ada County Highway District Ada County Development Services Central District Health COMPASS (Comp Plan only) Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrig. District Idaho Power Co. (FP,PP,cuP/SHP only) QWest (FP/PP/SHP only) IntermoUntaln G8S (FP/PP/SHP only) Idaho Transportation Dept. (No FP) Ada County Ass. Land Records Downtown Projects: Meridian Development Corp. Historical Preservation Comm. South of RR / SW Meridian: NW Pipeline New York Irrigation District Boise-Kuna Irrigation District Boise Project Board of Control /Tim Page Your Concise Remarks: City Clerk's Office • 33 E. Idaho Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-888-4433 •Fax 208-888-4218 • www.meridiancity.org E IDIAN~.=---- Planning Department 1 c: ~ t~~ :~ COMMISSION & COUNCIL REVIF~ APPLICATION -~~ +{~ ~•~. ~. ,~ Type of Review Requested (check all that apply) ' ~} ''~~~" „k. ^ Alternative Compliance ` ^ Annexation and Zoning ^ Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment ^ Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment STAFF USE ORILY: ^ Conditional Use Permit n,p ~0 /1 Z ~~_~ ^ Conditional Use Permit Modification File number(s): I~! ' // - ^Design Review ^ Final Plat ^ Final Plat Modification Project name: ^ Planned Unit Development Date filed: ~"12' 1 ~ Date con lete: ~~- ~ ^ Preliminary Plat • ~ ~ ~tl,SOIt,S ^ Private Street Assigned Planner: _ ^ Rezone Related files: ~ Z 'd ~/ -0 3 7 : / 'd.3 "d ^Shortplat Cct/~- o3-07C~' FP~-OS-Osd ^ Time Extension (Commission or Council) ^ UDC Text Amendment Hearing date: '~S-« ~ Commission ^ Council ^ Vacation (Council) ^ Variance ^ Other Applicant Information Applicant name: Steve Arnold. CK Eneineers Phone: 871-7020 Applicant address: 1785 Whisper Cove Avenue, Boise, Idaho Zip: 83709 Applicant's interest in property: ^ Own ^ Rent ^ Optioned ~ Other Engineering Consultant Owner name: Liberty Development Inc. Phone: 895-8858 Owner address: 2358 S. Titanium Place Meridian Id. Zip: 83642 Agent name (e.g., architect, engineer, developer, representative): Steve Arnold Firm name: CK Engineers Phone: 871-7020 Address: 1785 Whisper Cove Avenue, Boise Id. Zip: 83709 Primary contact is: Q Applicant ^ Owner ^ Agent ^ Other Contact name: Steve Arnold Phone: 871-7020 E-mail: stevenck-engineers.com Fax: 321-0525 Subject Property Information Location/street address: south side of Pine Street, east of Blackcat Road. Assessor's parcel number(s): 51210315010 Township, range, section: Sec 10, 3N, 1W Total acreage: 28~~. Current land use: Agriculture Current zoning district: R-8 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 • Meridian, Idaho 83012 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org • Project Description Projecdsubdivision name: Cheste~eld Subdivision General description of proposed projectfrequest: Arequest for preliminary plat approval for 148-single family lots and rezone for 1.48 acres for the alley loaded lots. Proposed zoning district(s): Existing R-8, and R-15 for a portion of the lots adjacent to the existing alley Acres of each zone proposed: 1.48-acres R-15 Type of use proposed (check all that apply): ^ Residential ^ Commercial ^ Office ^ Industrial ^ Other Amenities provided with this development (if applicable): 3.10 acres of common/open space with a gathering area Who will own & maintain the pressurized irrigation system in this development? Nampa Meridian Irrigation Which irrigation district does this property lie within? Nampa Meridian Irrigation District Primary irrigation source: Surface Water from NMID Secondary: City Water Square footage of landscaped areas to be irrigated (if primary or secondary point of connection is City water>: 3.10-acres Residential Project Summary (if applicable) Number of residential units: 148 Number of building lots: 148 Number of common and/or other lots: 12 Proposed number of dwelling units (for multi-family developments only): 1 Bedroom: N/A 2 or more Bedrooms: N/A Minimum syuare footage of structure(s) (excl. garage): N/A for R-8 Proposed building height: 35-feet Minimum property size (s.f): 3,600 s.f Average property size (s.f.): 7,363 s.f Gross density (DU/acre-total land): 5.25 Net density (DU/acre-excluding roads & alleys): 6.76 Percentage of open space provided: 11-Percent Acreage of open space: 3.10 Percentage of useable open space: 10-Percent (See Chapter 3, Article G, for qualified open space) Type of open space provided in acres (i.e., landscaping, public, common, etc): 3.10 acres common space & st buffer Type of dwelling(s) proposed: OSingle-family ^ Townhomes ^Duplexes ^Mu1ti-family Non-residential Project Summary (if applicable) Number of building lots: Other lots: Gross floor area proposed: Existing (if applicable): Hours of operation (days and hours): Building height: Percentage of site/project devoted to the following: Landscaping: Total number of employees: Building: Paving: Maximum number of employees at any one time: Number and ages of students/children (if applicable): Seating capacity: Total number of parking spaces provided: Number of compact spaces provided: Authorization Print applicant name: - ~~G /~ `fi' Applicant signature: .~~~ .~- Date: 8/9/2011 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org 2 • • Narrative/Statement of Development Features for the Chesterfield Preliminary Plat The applicant is proposing 148 single-family dwellings with 12-common lots that will be served via public roads constructed to ACHD standazds. The site is approximately 28.2-acres and will be providing 3.10- acres of common/open space azeas. Within Lot 5, Block 13, the application will provide an amenity. A play structure was constructed in phase one as a condition of the CUP. The density is approximately 5.25 dwelling units per acre, which is considered medium density. The housing and product type will be similar to what was constructed in phase one. 2. The proposed use and development plan is harmonious with the existing and proposed uses which calls for single-family dwellings within this section of Meridian. The proposed development has a medium density of 5.25 dwellings per acre. The site is currently zoned R-8, the applicant is requesting a rezone for a portion of the site, 1.48-acres, to R-15 for the lots adjacent to the existing alley. The request for the rezone was to allow those lots to fall below the R-8 dimensional standazds; all services were previously constructed to those lots which made constructing them to conform to the R-8 standards not practical. Lots will range from 3,600-square feet (alley lots) to over 11,000-square feet. The average lot size faz exceeds the minimum requirements of the R-8 zone. 3. Our last meeting to discuss the preliminary plat and annexation application was on Apri126, 2011. There were several prior to that meeting discussing various method to develop the property. 4. The site will generate approximately 1,480 additional vehicle trips per day. The existing streets can accommodated the traffic generated from this site. A traffic study has been submitted to ACHD and was approved with the original application. 5. The applicant will not be requesting a variance. 6. The use will not adversely affect other properties in the vicinity. The site is contiguous to other parcels that have been previously developed in a similaz fashion. The property was previously annexed into the City of Meridian. This development conforms to the original application that expired. The only difference from this application and the previous is the lots fronting Newland Street along the southern boundary. Those lots have been modified from shazed driveways to single access driveways. 7. The site will be served adequately by existing public facilities and services. There is an existing sewer line located within the proposed alignment of Meadow Pine Street, extending south through Sheeford Avenue and the common lot at the southeast corner of the development. The sewer was previously constructed through this site to serve other developments within the vicinity. The proposed use will not create excessive additional cost for public facilities and services. 8. The proposed use will not involve activities or processes that produce traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glaze or odors that will be detrimental to any persons or property. 9. The proposed uses will not result in the destruction of a natural scenic or historic feature considered being of major importance. 10. The applicant agrees to pay any additional sewer, water or trash fees or charges, if any, associated with the use. Development will connect to City services and comply with City Ordinances. 11. The Street names do not conflict with City grid system, existing sfreet names are utilized within the proposed development. 12. The property will be posted 10 days before the hearing. A signed affidavit has been provided to reassure the City of its installation. 13. The applicant will deliver to the Zoning Administrator a notarized statement that the property was posted. uuwc tUMflU UOLMIrJ W:UL Mre DEPUfY Ytcki Allen RECORDED-REQUEST OF 2~~'1'~0 _~ + Pioneer L II I I I II II II11J~,((I I I2I IIIII II I !II III WARRANTY DEED Order No. 250730 FOR VALUE RECEIVED Centennial Development. LLC, sn Idaho Limited Liability Company, the grantor{s), do(es) hereby gran[, bargain, sell and convey unto Liberty Development' Inc., an Idaho Corporation whose current address is: 36 E. Pine Meridian, Idaho 83642 the grantee(s), the following described premises, in Ada County, Idaho, TO WIT: See attached EXHIBIT A, hereby made a part hereof. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, with thttr appurtenances unto the said Grantee(s), heirs and assigns forever. And the said Grantor does hereby covenant to and with the said Grantee(s), that Liberty Development, Inc., an Idaho Cotporatiao, is the owner in tee simple of said premises; and that said premises are free from all encumbrances Except: Current Year Tazes, conditions, covenants, restrictions, reservations, easements, rights and rights of way, apparent or of record. And that Centennial Development, LLC, an Idaho Limited Liability Company, will warrant and defrnd the same frrom ail lawful claims whatsoever. Centennial Development, LLC, an Idaho Limited Liability Company By: Heanla Devel went, LLC, an Idaho Limited Liability Company, Manager of Centennial Development, LLC B• and , Sr., ager of Heartland Development, LLC .•-~-••~ ~°•a jo'rAR r Dated: pl - ~vZ- tD ,~" _'~ ~~ t PDeL~G m~ O Limited Liability Company Acknowledgment ~.8 °F l9 State of Idaho ) )ss County of Ada ) efD ~- , On this,~~ day of i-^ , ,}r , in the year 2005, before rne~} KC.~ ~ ,V.v 5 ~../. s notary public in and for the State of Idaho, personally apparel John A. Laude, Sr., Manager of Hwnland Devebpmmt, LLC, known or identified co me (of proved to me on the troth of ), to be one of the members ar designated agrnts in the limited ' ' iry company of Hw elopmwt, LLC, and the member a designated agent or one of the mvnbus or dcsigna ag who subscribed ~ lirtq' lability company name to the foregoing insnument, and acknowledged to me that he or a ex ted the rmit ability rnmpany name. ~f~ ' -r-~ N blic ford Residing at~~.ti~ ~ A .i ~ y c~ My commission expires e~- C~7 -t'~ ~' ~ • Order No. 250730 EXHIBIT A A parcel of land being a portion of the NE '/. of the SW '/. and a portion of the NW '/. of the SE '/, of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a 3" brass cap marking the NW corner of the SW '/. of said Section 10; Thcnce South 89° 10'36" East coincident with the North line of the NW '/. of the SW '/. a distance of 1318.88 feet to a 5/8" rebar and no cap marking the NW corner of said NE'/. of the SW '/. and the POINT OF BEGWNING; Thence South 89°11' l0" East coincident with the North line of said NE '/. of the SW '/. a distance of 1317.15 feet to a 3" brass cap marking the NW comer of said NW '/. of the SE '/,; Thence South 89°11'07" East coincident with the North line of said NW '/. of the SE'/. a distance of 853.69 feet to a 5/8" rebar/cap PLS 5461 of the West right of way line of the Ten Mile Drain; Thence South 17°00'28" East coincident with said West right of way line of the Ten Mile Drain, 198.28 feet to a 5/8" rebar/cap PLS 5461; Thence South 22°19'37" East coincident with said West right of way line of the Ten Mite Drain, 83.44 feet to a 5/8" rebar/cap PLS 5461; Thence South 18°56'22" East coincident with said West right of way line of the Ten Mite Drain, 94.89 feet to a 5/8" rebar/cap PLS 5461; Thence South 24°58' 19" East coincident with said West right of way line of the Ten Mile Drain, 125.16 feet to a 5/8" rebar/cap PLS 5461; Thence South 38°55'23" East coincident with said West right of way line of the Ten Mile Drain, 100.02 feet to a 5/8" rebar/cap PLS 5461; Thence South 39°18'43" East coincident with said West right of way line of the Ten Mile Drain, 89.05 feet to a 5/8" rebar/cap PLS 5461 . Thence South 45°01'45" East coincident with said West right of way line of the Ten Mile Drain, 1.76 feet to a 5I8" rebar/cap PLS 5461; Thence leaving said West right of way line of the Ten Mile Drain, North 88°27'07" West, 16.07 fcet to a 5J8" rebar/cap PLS 5461; Thence South 00°50'53" West, 267.00 feet to a 5/8" rebar/cap PLS 5461 on the North right of way line of the Oregon Shortline Railroad; Thence North 88°26'25" West coincident with the said North right of way line of the Oregon Shortline Railroad, 2454.42 feet to a S/8" rebar/cap PLS 5461 on the West line of said NE'/. of the SW '/.; Thence North 00°36'48" East coincident with the West line of said NE'/. of the SW '!. a distance of 848.58 feet to the POINT OF BEGINIV7:NG. • • AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST STATE OF IDAHO COUNTY OF ADA 1. .,J~ 1~~, 23f S 5, 7 ~ -t~ n r ~~ ~~~r_~ /~,/~ ~ ~ (name) w~~ /. (address) (city) (state) being first duly sworn upon, oath, depose and say: That I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant my permission to: (n~me) (address) --~ $ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~• to submit the accompanying application(s) pertaining to that property. I agree to indemnify, defend and hold the City of Meridian and its employees harmless from any claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements contained herein or as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application. 3. I hereby grant permission to City of Meridian staff to enter the subject property for the purpose of site inspections related to processing said application(s). Dated this ~ ~~ day SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me OpVID L~~,~ tzoT~Rr ~~w p0B LiG ~ O ~~F OF 10 p~••~ Residing at: ~~D)'!.C ~ D My Commission Expires: 8~~3~ ~ a-o ! 3 ~/ CJ' / y~,~~ (Notary Public for Idaho) • PRELIMINARY PLAT SHOWI~ CHES7'FRf'IEI,D ~L'BDIVIS70.~- LOCATED IN THE SOUTH 1 /2 OF SECTION 10, T.3N., R.1 W., B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2011 -- SCALE 1" = 1000' ~ -- ~= N W E S y5\p NA ~ F~ p~ ~~G1STE/?FO ~a/ 2~ a 9412 '° ST ~O C ATE OF SOP P ~p S. KIN`~~ DRAWN BY: ut5 C H E S T E R F~ E N D CHECKED BY: CSK CK ENGINEERING DATE: os/ot/t t 860 HEADWATERS DR. ~ C ~l TY MAP FILE: CHESTERFlELD PRE PU+T.DWG EAGLE, ID 83616 p PHONE 208-869-0590 D ~ R : P:\CHESfERFlELD\q(-ENG\owcs • CITY OF MERIDIAN PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES Project/Subdivision Name: Leh? ei~ Applicant(s)/Contact(s): h rbu City Staff: . ~i t Location: 5n ~-f~ ~. ~~- D t tee.. Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use MaF Design Guidelines Development C ntext: Proposed Use: ~ s ~ dR~. ~ l Q Existing Use: ~a~ r Surrounding Uses: ~ o ~ ~- C_ b Street Buffer(s) and/or Land Use Buffe~r(sQ): Open Space/Amenities/Pathways: / Access/Stub StreetslStreet System: ~ uu Sewer & Water Service: ~~ • ~;o~-~ .ti Topography/Hydrology/Floodplain Issues; _ Canals/Ditches/Irrigation/Hazards: 7-~-~ History: Az-o3-03~ " P -a3-c Additional Meeting Notes: t i_ ~ , Other AgencieslDepartments to Contact: ^ Ada County Highway District ^ Nampa Meridian Irrigation District ^ Idaho Transportation Department ^ Settler's Irrigation District ^ Sanitary Services Company ^ Police Department ^ Central District Health Department ^ Fire Department Application(s) Required: ^ Administrative Design Review ^ ~] Alternative Compliance ~/(~ 0. o u ^ [~ Annexation ^ ^ City Council Review ^ ^ Comprehensive Plan Amendment -Map ^ ^ Comprehensive Plan Amendment -Text ^ Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit ModificationlTransfer Development Agreement Modification Final Plat Final Plat Modification Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat ~ 2, ~~W,o o I- ~ zN•De P~~' Private Street 1 ~+ m ~e~ , Public Works Department S~G~`~'~ Building Department $~7 ^ Parks Department ^ Other. ^ Short Plat ^ Time Extension -Council ^ UDC Text Amendment ^ Vacation ^ Variance ^ Other Notes: 1) Applicants are required to hold a neighborhood meeting in accord with UDC 11-5A-5C prior to submittal of an application requiring a public hearing (except for a vacation or short plat); and 2) All applicants for permits requiring a public hearing shall post the site with a public hearing notice in accord with UDC 11-5A-5D.3 (except for UDC text amendments, Comp Plan text amendments, and vacations). The information provided during this meeting is based on current UDC requirements and the Comprbhensive Plan. Any subsequent changes to the UDC and/or Comp Plan may affect your submiftaland/or application. This pre-application meeting shall be valid for four (4) months. (~ ~~ ~. .~ ~T Proposed Zoning: ~~-/ Existing Zoning: 2 - ~ C/a~,..~ Date: ~/-Z6 -// of Property: t 2 ~ a ~,~,~,-~. al~r~~ 25 ' ~ r~-..g ~0'',,,Q ~-S -fir ~~ e ~ ~o . ~ G K c ~k, loe~~.d G.. .~l~o`( z.e7-w .rI • ENGINEERINGP~ :June I0, 201.I INVITATIUN' TQ NE~GI~BURH~UD M~~'~G l~ ~ ~; This is an imritation to a neighborhood meeting concerning a Pmlminary Flat and a Rezone of ~ portion of the prev7iously approved Che~erfield Subdivision. `The site is located oh the south side of Pine Avenue, ifl mile east of Black Cat Road (South i!2 of Section 10, T.3N., R, i W.). The City of Meridian requires the applmt to provide an opporttndty fc~ public it prior to the submittal of a Preliminary P} and Rezone ~ The be requesting approval to construct 149 si.fa~nily lots cm Z$.~. The neighborhood meeting will be held 6;00-g.m. on Tuesday, Jury 2i, 20i I ~ the .proposed development .site, off Pine Avenge. If you cacmot atte~acl the ~ and have questions concerning the application for Preliminary Ply and Rene, please feel ~ -tn call me at 871.7020. Sincerely, CK Engineers P,C. Steve .Arnold Planning Profits A~anag~r y W W O Z W Q Z H W 0 Z V d ~O a .o ~_ O N N U N C i+ o a` N C A ~ a w c z d ~ ~ a n ~~ ~~ .~ W N .J ~- . ~ ~ h ~ m O f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~' ! , '~ O ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ C N . ~ e0 S ~ d ~ Z ~. ~ .~ ' E ca ~~ M ~ ~ ~ 0 U ui ~ .- >~ '` w 0 ~• ,a? o ~p N O ~ ~ _ co CD N C O L a U 1A • COMMITMENT OF PROPERTY POSTING Per Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-SA-SD, the applicant for all applications requiring a public hearing (except for a UDC text amendment, a Comprehensive Plan text amendment and/or vacations) shall post the subject property not less than ten (10) days prior to the hearing. The applicant shall post a copy of the public hearing notice of the application(s) on the property under consideration. The applicant shall submit proof of property posting in the form of a notarized statement and a photograph of the posting to the City no later than seven (7) days prior to the public hearing attesting to where and when the sign(s) were posted. Unless such Certificate is received by the required date, the hearing will be continued. The sign(s) shall be removed no later than three (3) days after the end of the public hearing for which the sign(s) had been posted. I am aware of the above requirements and will comply with the posting requirements as stated in UDC 11-SA-5. Applicant/agent signature Date ~,~.~-~ uru~u on+vn aevon+nAi zouc a l u @ 1f~a acsrtAr>:In weo. No. , 9 `~ ~-:c _~-_ ~ ~ a 114 b b ~ N 17 ,A3~ I I I ~ I I ~ I ~ I 1 _ __ w ^ g ^ 1e .oo• .H,.ml I ~'$g{ Q I ~: F as 1 ,ar ~ ~-- 4 S - • g ! Iti 84 .m af,~ K.P a"' ,a 3,u _ i ~ ~ __ - GG L_ ~ d b• ~ ~ A a v 4 w• ~ Ew•'Ew ilo ~ i85 .b' ~oP .vt °I N N ( t .o n N ~ I ~ .. ~ o." f ~y i I _ ~ f, i ~~ dew $iv ~~ ~~ ~~~ e~u aia, i.H i,.e ~ ; 5 I-- o< ~ ~ ~ a, b ( A ~ ~...i -i' - - -- -- - 8 ~ ~ 1 u l ~ l i' 3 °' ~ I --- _ j I :rr a.>v s,~ +i<a irx'a~~ a&~ 1 aiws ia- 18 I .~ < r oT a ~~ ' m~ ~• b~ ~~ y. a. ~~ s.~ - - 4 y~~ b V -- a",~'vs i ~ ~ I- ~ ~~ ~~ ~~>Ga ti ~ $~° ai° 8~, Lei°'Qi° -i. Qi„ Ri„ a i a I I _ ~ ~$ ~ ~w~g aE_ ii~$ic$i,>xi~,aia$i~eimaieao^a a o i (-- - ~ ~. ~. ~. n. `' L _ R °°T~-~a --- -~ -_~ -- - _ - sI r.- ~, ~ I ~.Sa ~I Eo s~ aia e~~ ~ x,~~s,~~ 8i,, ii~ Q6-, ~ a.~ ~ I I ~ i 4 , gy9~', m Ha ..". fl =siY N~' w~A~ it~w a~~ eirleim ~ i~'e. $~.N F~ °^°_$ a~ uI ~ ~. "_ .. _. _ moot' E ~~~~ •~m ~I ab° ° rte, i m a_•-"m ~ ~~/~ BE ~ ja ~ a j~,+Pi .,a ~ a~X Ai I~ ~a a„m E~ ~ w~ ~ x~ I N N o~ ' Q a g~ o~ E J ~ V Z~ A ' n~~b U~ I a a~ »~ `t~ ¢ e e~u~`E' £` . ~ f ~ ~~ 1 `p ~ ~ V mN OV m~J /' ZWN~ a x ttom~, n ~- t-p~~1 n • L m ~1 4 e'.0 e~~~. _-___ _. _ OIL ~F i0 unvutlFO / ~la ~~I ?~ a QF i ~/Nlu/u &I ~ ~41e11i,~A°~ ~y 3 I NZ Q'µ°GR kli$ ~~i hS~ ~~ ~~~~ s~ te4~ a~~~ .~~~ ~~ ~~^~~ ~~ ~ 2R4 C ~`Y Rig ~~~ _~ ~6YFlm ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~{z R3&~$~ _. E ~, q ,~ 9.. ~ ~~ P ~ ~ s 6 F ~9~ ~~~ ~~> ~s ~~~~~ ~ ~ R~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~6~ mks ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ b~~w~~ ~~ ~~~ i~~$~i~~~~~~ a~~ ~g ~ a~ ,3 ~ ~~ 4~~ ~-~ ~~ ~~~~ s ~ ~~~~~~ ~ M k $ ~m ~~~ 6 ~ ~~ ~ i~ ~~ mSm v ,II i 1 ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ mr ~ 666 ) ,. I VIII ,I P ~~~ ~~ '_~ ~~ ~~ ~T .~ ~~~~~~ lii ~i llIlli ~~ _.. 'tn,~~ "= CHESTERFIELD SUBDIVISION DEI!EL4"ER/9WyER PIANNER~cDNTACT Etl~B , A ~ PRELIMINARY PLAT LIBERTY OEVELDPMENf INC. CK"ENGINEERING CK-ENGMIEERING ~~ SHAWN BROWNLEE SIEVE ARNOLD CHAD KINKELA w 9 SECTION ~ D, T.3N., R. ~ W. B.M. 2558 S. TITANIUM PLACE 1785 WHISPER COVE AVE. 960 HFADWAIERS DR. _ 1 '~ CITY GF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2081895- 858642 z e 8711-670209 ~ ~9 059,D~6 ~~~ ~' ~~ .moo, ~ ' ~;~, ~~ _• s v. Q~w. ~ '~T 1- .. o ' ~ .~ ~ , ° l ~ ~ f ~ ® ; a, ®; ®, ; ®, ® ®; 1 - ~ ~ ~ ® ~ ~ ~ _ _- -- ., _ ~ , ~ ~ m ~ ~~ ~' 0 0 0 ~°~ °j of ~ ° o 4-- -,- -~.~--,- ~ _ _ _0 ~ ~ a a ~ ~ ® ~ o~ ~~ o~ ~~ °~ ©~ a m~ ® - ~ ___. ~11I o _ i 1_.~ L L 1.. _ I~~ -._ _. ~ ' N ~ ° a-~ ® - ---~ i m -- ~ m - ® o ' o 2 ~ _~' -~I~ ~~~,_ s _ _® - ~ o ~ ~ i ~ p o _ ® }- - - o , a! -- ~ ® ~ ~~ " ~ ® a~-~ ® 0, °~ '~`'® ~ o~ fJ --'`~ ~ ~ ~. b ___ ,~ ® .~ ~ ~ ~ /' ' ~~~ ^ ~y t 1 D o~ m v ~~ I ~ __ o ~m Z~~ ~; yLi m 1~.. Z ~fi '; o" o~.Dv D li C -C ~ ~ 10` ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ =4&6z6 ~~~~ ~ ~ Z;N rn ~ '-yC- O Cy 0 g~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~~ °n I"n ~ z o ~b~ ~~ B~ ~ !! i p~~ ~6~ ~Q~~ a i'r ~ ~ C=O ~~ {~Si`ci~ti~tly0tlyyc~~1 •Aw H ^00 •if ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ g ' ~ ~ ; PRE-PL AT CHESTERFIELD PRELIMINAR Y PLAT ...a ~ I I ~ ~ a 9 r g OVERALL SITE PLAN TRILOGY DEVELOPMENT ~ ~I a , MERIDIAN, IDAHO l CHt-STERF4EI_G U Z " ' ' - SUBDIVISIO N: N0. 1 77 E 33.00 m N 00'28 OG yJ '~ * _00'2 77" E 567.73' . .. ~.r r. r~. r _ .r r. .~, r r ~ ' ~ D ~ ~ II T ~ ~ i ~ _ ai ~ }~ l I~ I I I ~ k ~ I ~ ~ `' ------- f:31 •. . '~ ~~j ~ ~ ~~ Q~ a ~I Q~ Q ~ ss ,.. 1 ~ ~~ m I I I I A I I ~° •` ~ ~ ! I ~ 1 ~ 1 .. ----- ' Z --- , --y - ' ' -- - ----- - 3AV NO11ViWJ -- -- -- J '~ O ~: ~ 't ~p~ / , ~ • Aid '• } t ~ .r r . , • ti s I I . fi f :v :A 'i' i O I O I O r 'i ~ h , I O I O ~ I~i 1 ~.~~ ' >: f: M tY ~ f ~'y.~: ~JV / L M • I- vJl r .~ V Y1ryiJ R~If.'; .. ,• ~. w . t I I ~ • ¢ a r ii L ,~ ti •'J m•:'i ~ P ^~, I , pI11 V I • I 1 I O 1 ~ I~ O l O 4 . i f~^ t j Ja ~.3rf rR 'LA'S' •, :q'~• •i. l '•t•Ji A. ~1; i.~•... :f vi tl`11~: t ai Ai ni f $ tt; ~~. •p~ ,: t pt y ~ •7 ~7 ® I 1 , ; a • 4 J ' l f~ r ~i } . • : : ; . f o- ~~ , 1 i } ; ~ . A r °r•A ,. e y ~. A . , i ~ 1 Jt~ ~ ~ I oRweouEwE. ; ~ _T --- -r--- ~--- .,, ~~ ~ e ~ m -~ 00 I I I ~ ----- ~ >~ :OI OI O 1 O~ Di 1 ~ A m ' I 1 I I O ~ I ' y I , I I I I I r-_ _ __ .. I ~ ~ ~ I I 1 I 3 I O ~ ~ 1 I I O I 1 ______ y~ } ~ I I OI O I O I ~ '1 I ~$®~• •~ I J 1 I /~ I . I I I I I I I I I ~~ _ ~t~ , NOTEI CREEK RVE. ~ I ', ~ _ - - _ ~ -_ -- - _ ~ -1 _r-' -~~ /^ ~ ~ ..f•..•. ~ ' I ' ) a , , I I I 1 / 1 - ~ 1 1 ~~ ;O I I OI O I i I O I ~ O I 1 Jw 1 ¢ ~~ ~•! ~ Y~ >!ii I I 1 I I I O I p A ~'~I 1 4~ O f7 . I I I 1 1 • n s - - -~--- ~ ~~ I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ _.. ~ • I I I I I I I I' ~ O I 1 ~ __ ___ _ _ I O ~; I I 1 ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~; °~ Xl~ASIONS: CHESTERFIELD PRELIMINARY PLAT ~ ; f ~~ ~I9L c ~ i G ~>a LA PRE-PLAT NDSCAPE PLAN TRILOGY DEVELOPMENT ~ 9 r MERIDIAN, IDAHO • l ~..l.~... ~.....~.~. ....~~.... .. ..Q.... .. ~; •I o• ®f ®I ®I~ ~ o ', ~ N ~v ^, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ y ^ i I --i-- ~ --~---- i ~ -- ~ ' '~ m ~ ~~ -- -- I ~ I ; ,. Z ~~~~_~ gfE!lflIOE AVE. ~ ~~~~ ~~~.~~_ t ____ __ I O '6 $g ='.1 ~~ o ~ ,. _.1 ~o i o ---- ~~~ C~_ ~ ~~~ N ~ ' {:. <.• y' , i i _ ~. . ~ •,: ~ ~g m ~ ~ t O ; ` /~ ~r ,tom ~~ ~ ~g ~ • • •r •r'1•~ •:'r:.,t • ~ / o ^ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ w - ~, .;. ~ ~ •. ..... •~ • ~ ~ ~ / ~~ ~ ' O ~ ~~ - ~ /-'_ ~ , ~ ` ~ ~ , ,, ~ / ~ \~ , - ~" ~ ,- , ~ / \ ` ' ,, '' ~ ~~ • -- ~ ~ ~ m .• , ,- -~~ ~ - ~ - ~ N _ '~ ~. - '" ~ a> ~ ., ' '~ ~ \ / , ~+ r ~~~ ,~ e ~~ ~, ~ »~ ~~ ~ ~ •, . wo ~ •s^ A 1+ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ° CHESTERFIELD PRELIMINARY PLAT (Q;1751 0N5: ,j ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 9 . PRE-PLA T TRILOGY DEVELOPMENT IV ~ ~~ o ~ f a LANDSCAPE PLAN MERIDIAN, IDAHO • '.. SUB~IV!SIONI NIO. 1 J ' ^ ' ^ a ~' " N 01'12'43" E 160.00' --~-ter== `~ _. _ _ _ . --" ------r+--- --- , ~ N~ 00'2 17" E 56 .~-.. - o ~ f ~ 1 I- +~ ~ , O I t' ~ i ~ 1 i ~. I i^ m ~. g I -------- ~g ~g of ~ o~ of ® I I , ~. I o~. of I^ I , ~e O ~e ~ CCCgggggg ~ I ~ ~ 1 I I ~ I^ ~ ~ a - - - -- -- -- -- ~ .M. .. ~ ti:. i .~ li f ~ ' 4 a ~ _.. .r d y: '•r ' ~. ~ I I 1 M I ^ I ^ C r ' , , v ~ a s I I O . 3 , f/~ •.•i ~t •P r.,,~t f?x':3 •:q tr ~ t •y ..~ .'' ~' '' , ~ I I ~g 1 I I I I I I ^ I 1 ^ i x r ~ ~ `. ~g onl~suuE ~~. ^ f0 00 C7 ~ ® ~° b i ' -- - --- , 1 '° ~ D ~ ~ ~ ~ I - - - -~~--~ ~~O I I I ®~ I t I I I I I I 1 I ^ 1 O I ~ I O I i0 I I I I : I 1 I I I - ----~ I f--- ~ --.~ _ ~ ~ ® I I 1 ^ ~ --------~ I O' I I i 1 N P OI O O I . ' ~ I ^ I ~ ~ I I ~ I ® I y I I I I I I ^ 1 I ^ I ^ fi t3~~ E I _ _ ._ _ _ ~ ~ O I I I I NOTEL CREEK AVE. ^ 2 ii{t ~ I ^ ti k --- - -- -- - - -r- -1--- I 1 -^ -r -~- ^ ~ 1 I ~ _ __ - ~ . --- O I ---. ®I o of of 'o , ~ ~ I I I I ,~. 6 ~ E o _ I __ _ ~.~ -~- 1 I --! -- 1---- I , I _ --L--~- ~ ~ O I ~ ^ i ~ ~ O I A I ~ O ^ I ^, z ___ -___ I I ^ 1 ~ ~ flEY1510N5: r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ CHESTERFIELD P RELIMINARY PLAT W l I !~ ~ E ~1i LANDSCAPE PLAN TRILOGY DEVELOPMENT t ~I - MERIDIA N, IDAHO I I I I I I . o ~~ O ~ ~ -__ ` ~--- u \ ~ • ~ I ~ r Z = ~ I--- ' - i -----i o I ~ ~ Q ~ I , ~ \ ~ ~\ ~ , m ~ ~- _- _-__ ~ ` I ~~ ~ A I o~ ~ / T r Z N_ , ® 1 ~ ~ i ~------ ----~ --- ----- ~ ~ O `-- ~ ( ~ I ~ ~tZ --- ------~ ------ - I o~ ® ~ I ~ ~-- o l ---- ------ + -- ~ O I ~ M ',~ ~--~,- ~ ~ ~ ~ . -- -----~ I O ~ I ~ O ~~-- , ~ ~ -- ~ ' i ' p H~i C --- i ----- ~ -~ --------- --- _ ~ ~ 0 Tl~--- ~ ~ ~ % o I + I .. O • ~~ i ~ - --_~ _ _ _'..J _ _ I O _ _ _ -- - _ ~ O ~ x~~ C~ T ~ _ ~ f----_ ~----- ~ ~ ~ -----~ -- ~oo D ~ o f ,-------g ® 1 ~ ~ m m ~ ~ o I -- ---- o I ~ I ~ ~-- ~ -' _ __, d ~ __ ~_ ~ --~ ---~ ~ ~ ~~ I g ~ < i ~ \ • fi ~ ~ $g $, ~ o ~ I o ~ , , -- I ~ I ® ~ $ ., ~ . , ~,, ,~ , --- -----a I , I ~ ~ , ^ ~ ® ~ _ 0 ~ dQ '"~ ., S 0030'03" W 267.00' o ao ",r i i y ~~ V , ~ __ .. ` • U t ~ ~/ I: , f ^0 ~t^ ~~~ 6 ~ TEN SIONS: f" ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ '~ ¢ °~ ~ PRE-PLAT CHESTERFIELDPRELtMINARYPLAT ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ .a LANDSCAPE PLAN TRILOGY DEVELOPMENT - -~ s MERIDIAN, IDA HO l ~ .. ~ ~~ r ~~ D ~ v? sy .,•tII~r.ptp.~.~j ~ ~a ~~ti~~$ar~r~ ~4~ ,~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ a~ i• Z ~ m ® p F E 8 Flo a - . . • ~ r 1 e e ~ ~ ~ a a ~ s . o e o , : R 4 s ~ ~ y ~~ ~ ~~ a Bg 6 ~~ #r~r}~~~~~~r ip~ o ~ }7 1 ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~E~~~ i ~~~~~ ~ ~~~'€~~~ g 6 ~~ Q ~ vg ~ Y~ F ~e ~ ~ r ~ ~~~a ~~~ 1~,~.~t ~. cn ~ ~ ,a~ 4g ~ag~~, ~t ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~.~~i; 3 d rP r ~~ ~ g ~ ~6~ ~ ~~~ ~4 ~~ ~~ ~ ~S~ iR. ~ ~ ~~~ I; ~ T , i ,~ N i ~ rt~~ ! ~ ~~ ik j• 9 `: f #d~g~ ~~q~~~~~~~'i i a ~ i ~ ~ ~ !~ ~~ 8 s ~~ ~ i q~ '~" ~ r' ~ g~ EE i1~Qn3yy ~8~a~~jy{{ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~ z ~ p p F F Y "' Y!" Y Y Y Y Y e ~a~ ~ Itl RSi ~ $~~s ~axAlagi r; a ~t$ ¢ ~ _ ~ Exec ~ ~ R ~ $RR~? $$$~$ + $$,~i$$ a ¢~~ t ~~ j1€jt{y ~~~ ~i~~+S~q$~~ S~ ~ t~ ~~€ C 6 > ~ r Y 9~~ ~ ST '~ '~ $ ! ! C ~ a4 d 4~ ~ '3 °T ~ '~ ~ ~T '~ '~ ~ $ ~{ ~{ S 4 0 '~ °A '~ '~ ~I 'fi ~ A r~,s~r $ar ~ g ~~ ~ s g~g~(i ~~` t t ~ E ; ~ i ~ $ $ , . K e e ~ $ ~ ~ $ $ $ $ ¢ $ i ~ ~ e K ~ $ $ i $ i $ $ ~~ ~ ~;i~j7 ~~ ! ~f ~[[ !~ k ~ i ~ i i i f # i ~ E ~r (A ~ 7 ~ ~ ~~~~a ~~~~ Y ° c i~g i~j ~g f ~br89Sa ~~ 1~. ~ lt~~s4~'~~ ~ryp ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ aZ ~~ S ~~ 46arga~~ ;P R~~ep~~r ~Y a ~~~ ~e~iG ~~ ~~ ~~ a~9 °~~ i ~ ~ ~F~~3~p~ ~ ~° ~~ i~ ~ ~ N°8~i~~3q~ ~ a ~ s k ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~' ~ '~ `~ ~~~~~~ a ~ ~ e~a~~ ~ ; ~~ ~ g ~ i ~~~~3i~i ~~~ ~p ~ a ~Ab i r q ~ ~ ai ~~~ ;f~i o ~ ~~~~~~ ~ a ~~k E ~- ~ i ~ t F ~ ~~ ~ ~ r ~ a ~ ~~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ $ ~~ R i ~ ~~ E ° ~~ ~e ~~ sF ~ a ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ $ ~~ i ~ ~ ~ b a gg ~~ ~° ~~ ~ a R F ~ ~ v E~ ~i ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ! 39~ ~ ®®®®qy ~~~ ~ ~~~~ 8 ~~~ ~~ ~• ~•+~ ~, ~$ ~~ e x ~~ 4 ~ is N ~ ~~a^ ~ $~~, a Y 66 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~x { a e~ L ~ ~ ~ Z •fi= °O • i ~° S ~ `~ CA ~ ~ `' g 6 ~ ~~ ' ~f ~O •ta Y PENSIONS: N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R PRE -PLAT CHE STERFIELD PRELIMINARY PLAT ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ LANDSCAP E SCHEDULE, TRILOGY DEVELOPMENT ~ ti N OTES & DETA ILS MERIDIAN, IDAHO K ~n~~~ !_unSk, EPONT VIEW P.IAif SU1E VIEW DKK VIEW 6EFT 51DE VIEW iP.N71SlONAI. ELEVATION scri.e: v ~" . ~., a~ • L.~rdt rsornaunrua 11WVfpKH MM.^aIMM ~:.>n Y~ 1'A v1 ~a l.N XJ~~ Faorrr vow ~nx raw ~~~r ~ vow t~nnmorw. ~~~vnnora • i T 9 n ~, i s, 0 3 m ~~ ~~ z; 4 ~~.~. ~`~ I i 1 g~ i 9 ~~ c T Z ~- ~ 0 3 m .~ • STOEBNER TYE R & STOEBNER ROBYN L ROMICK CHRISTOPHER E HEARST LLC 4213 W HEARST ST 4195 W HEARST ST 2489 N O'CONNER AVE MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83646-5572 MERIDIAN, ID 83646-0000 CASTLEBROOK SUB #3 HOA RAFTERY STEPHEN P & RAFTERY JOANIE FIELDSTAD LANCE C & FIELDSTAD PO BOX 1090 4144 W HEARST ST SAMANTHA L MERIDIAN, ID 83680-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 4178 W HEARST ST MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 PARR ROBERT M & PARR PAMELA S BYRON CATHERINE FOUTS AARON P & ROUSSEAU DANIELLE 226 SOUTHERN HEIGHTS BLVD 4127 W HEARST ST ELIZABETH SAN RAFAEL, CA 94901-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 3952 W HEARST ST MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 RHODE JOHN & RHODE KARI PAUL GUY R & PAUL DEBRA L NORBE JOSEPH ALBERT 3980 W HEARST ST 4004 W HEARST ST 4022 W HEARST ST MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 GRECO JOHN S JR GERMANE MATTHEW J & GERMANE NICOLE HICKS CRAIG PO BOX 4994 L 4076 W HEARST ST BOISE, ID 83711-0000 3066 S 1265 W MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 SYRACUSE, UT 84075-8050. BALL RYAN C & BALL JILL N CASTLEBROOK HOA KOETSIER PETER III & KOETSIER PHYLLIS E 4100 W HEARST ST PO BOX 1090 4105 W HEARST ST MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83680-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 PARDUE RANDY & PARDUE ATHENA ALDAPE ANGELA BETH BURNETT DAREN J & BURNETT BERTA M 4089 W HEARST ST 4067 W HEARST ST 4049 W HEARST ST MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 ORGILL NICKOLAS & ORGILL MELISSA CORDEN RAYMOND MCCOY BRIAN G & MCCOY MARGARET E 4033 W HEARST ST 4013 W HEARST ST 3991 W HEARST DR MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 HELBACH ZACHARY &HELBACH AMANDA BURGARD DAVID C & BURGARD CAROL R CASTLEBROOK HOA 3967 W HEARST ST 3939 W HEARST ST PO BOX 1090 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83680-0000 KAWAKAMI VALERIE L 2000 REVOCABLE DAVEY RICHARD A &DAVEY JULIE A ASHLEY DANIEL W TRUST 848 N OXWICH AVE 856 N OXWICH AVE PO BOX 956 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 BONSALL, CA 92003-0000 • CASTLEBROOK HOA PO BOX 1090 MERIDIAN, ID 83680-0000 HOBEN RICH J 4138 W MEADOWPINE ST MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 DAS INVESTMENTS LLC 6152 W HALF MOON LN EAGLE, ID 83616-0000 HEMENWAY DOUGLAS J 4164 W FARLAM DR MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 TOLMAN BENJAMIN H 4155 W FARLAM DR MERIDIAN; ID 83642=0000. ' WEBER CODY & WEBER KIMBERLY S 4208 W NEWLAND ST MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000- - COREY BARYON HOMES INC PO BOX 369 MERIDIAN, ID 83680-0000 TYE JEAN ELSIE 4117 W NEWLAND ST MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA 751 BROAD ST NEWARK, NJ 07102-3777 • PIKE ALISON & PIKE BRETT 4206 W MEADOWPINE ST MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 CASTLEBROOK HOA PO BOX 1090 MERIDIAN, ID 83680-0000 CICHOSKI MICHAEL G & WHEELOCK HOLLY R 4185 W MEADOWPINE ST MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 ALVEY JOSHUA THOMAS & ALVEY JENNIFER NICOLE 4196 W FARLAM DR MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 RIEDINGER ROD R &RIEDINGER TAMMY L 4160 W NEWLAND ST MERIDIAN, ID 83642-Ob00 ROBERSON JOSHUA D 724 N CARISBROOKE AVE MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MARLER ANETA J 4215 W NEWLAND ST MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 TEN MILE DEVELOPMENT LLC 1409 N MAIN ST MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 JENSEN RICHARD P & JENSEN FAITH 3720 W PINE AVE MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 DAS INVESTMENTS LLC 6152 W HALF MOON LN EAGLE, ID 83616-0000 WRIGHT DAVID K & WRIGHT OLEYDI M 4124 W MEADOWPINE ST MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 DONOHOO MATTHEW LYLE 374 N SANDRA PL EAGLE, ID 83616-0000 COWLES PATRICK E & COWLES PATRICIA L 10160. TIMBERRIM DR CASCADE, ID 83611-0000 MCCASHLAND DAVID S & MCCASHLAND CHRISTY A 4192 W NEWLAND ST MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 MAXWELL SCOTT A & MAXWELL JANET M 698 N CARISBROOKE•AVE 141ERTDIAN, ID 83642-0000 FASANO LETITIA C 4189 W NEWLAND ST MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 BOSLAU FAMILY TRUST & BOSLAU RODNEY JAMES TRUSTEE 3800 W PINE AVE MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 LIBERTY DEVELOPMENT INC 2364 S TITANIUM PL MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 NEWKIRK GLENN H & NEWKIRK BETTY JEAN F L & M ASSOCIATES LLC SCHWEIGER GARY R &SCHWEIGER JUDITH 4250 W FRANKLIN RD 6120 SYDNEY CIR L TRUST &SCHWEIGER GARY R MERIDIAN, ID 83642-5442 NAMPA, ID 83687-0000 3515 W PINE AVE MERIDIAN, ID 83642-5437 HICKS DAVID B & HICKS DEBBIE J 3725 W PINE AVE MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 • • GRS INVESTMENTS LLC 3515 W PINE AVE MERIDIAN, ID 83642-0000 AVEST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP P.O. BOX 140337 BOISE,ID 83714-0000 Project Name: Chesterfield File No: RZ-11-004 Request: Rezone of 1.48 acres of land from the R-8 zoning district to the R-15 zoning district, by Liberty Development, Inc. File No: PP-11-007 Request: Request for preliminary plat approval of 148 residential lots and 12 common lots on 28.2 acres in an existing R-8 and a proposed R-15 zone. Location: South side of W. Pine Avenue; midway between N. Black Cat Road and N. Ten Mile Road in the S '/2 of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West. CHESTERFIELD SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS UPDATE Prepared for Trilogy Development 2358 South Titan Place Meridian, Idaho 83642 SubmNted by C-K Engineering 860 Headwaters Drive Eagle, Idaho 83616 August 12, 2011 Prepared by: ' -> _- ' ;', r David Szplett Reviewed b Cjj, ~ OP ~~ S. • TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 3 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ......................................................................................................................3 STUDY AREA CONDITIONS ......................................................................................................................6 Study Area ...........................................................................................................................................6 Land Use ..............................................................................................................................................6 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................................6 Traffic Volumes ...................................................................................................................................6 Road System .......................................................................................................................................6 Study Period ........................................................................................................................................ 7 PROJECTED TRAFFIC ........:........................................................................................................................8 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................................13 Capacity Analysis and Level-of-Service ...................................................................................13 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES ..........................................................................................................15 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................................15 • • INTRODUCTION C-K Engineers has been retained to prepare an updated traffic impact analysis for the proposed Chesterfield development. The proposed Chesterfield subdivision is a single family development located south of the Pine Avenue and east of Black Cat Road in Meridian, Idaho. This project is planned to include 148 single family homes on 28.2 acres. This project was originally submitted and approved as a preliminary plat application in 2003. The original project was never constructed. This traffic analysis is an update of that original analysis. Figure 1 shows the location of the project and its vicinity. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the traffic impacts resulting from the proposed development in the vicinity of the project. This study will make recommendations for improvements to the transportation system which will mitigate any potentially adverse impacts of the development. This report is prepared in conformance with the Ada County Highway District's requirements of a major traffic impact study. In particular, the scope of the study includes the following: • Trip generation of the proposed development; • Trip distribution and traffic assignment of the site generated traffic; • Roadway capacity impacts on arterial roads in the project vicinity; • Impacts of the site generated traffic on the existing Black Cat Road intersections with Pine Avenue and Franklin Road plus one new site access intersection with Pine Avenue; and • Any potential transportation mitigation measures. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed Chesterfield subdivision is a residential development site located southeast of the Overland Road intersection with Locust Grove Road in Meridian, Idaho. This project single family development located south of the Pine Avenue and east of Black Cat Road. The proposed site plan for the project is shown in Figure 2. This transportation analysis assumes the development will be completed by the Year 2016. • • Figure 1: Project Location • L ~ N _ y 7 y N ~ / ~^ / 1 /1' ~~ C © S + ~ 1 tW / r(T ~ / (3LL~1d1/~ ~ u IC I p~ 1~ v ~I _ .. 7 = V: ~ i~ ~. ~ _ _ W - ~ ~Y ~ ~ ^ M •~ C •. W N ~~ ~ ~ t ~1t • u i,~rri vti ~ t~ ~ ~~ = A. W E ~ n: Z 1~/ ~ Z. r _ ..~1 ^ tY' ~~ U1 m ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~ 1~ N 0.tlt h ` ~ ~. ~ , ' R' ~ ^' C ";tt Rnw qac Il afR~-- . I ` . _ ~~~$ nAS u6 l' R „~N ~ a ~ N Z I( - ~ y ~ - a y• ~ I~ °t „ ~ ~ 1°-'r rocc $ 11 $SS F • ~ G~ ~ W •~ ' ' ~1 l~ ~ ''sr g , ' ~t I' .~ ~~I ~ $nw ~..c Im mf I R oosc •~ n n i~% $ L ',1 ~I C_ N ~ c: O ~ ~ 1 }y iY -i .cry ~ u ` .101 }` !01 :aa~ R ~~y '~ k r ~N~a $ I RY~nw« 'oo~ $ I. R: rrooc~ ~-•,~ ~ U ~ ~ n raaw8 .a n~~1 ,rot aw. R N rw <~N 1:°. 8 C C'1 J ~ ~ i wN ~' ~ two 88 - L $f:~ "~~ a R ~fi pt I I . ~N .m. $`SNavoa g~N .nN wa *~ wp COt w f Oal rr''..,, "V I pM wp $ W ~ ~ ~ ~,~ . w 1 $_ncaco 18"' k e. ! R ~ m~ 1' ~~ rz ~ I k2«~ rl - r ~ ~ , l ~ N A .m: I $: N xoo •~' v ac >e ~ tih , ~ 91r 1 d ac NNCOO. >d , r t i ~ ~N iu0i $~g,:9$r^E '„Ig13 n~$I ^e~'9. '~°G3 F:u:t I jivn~ 8 99 Y , I'- I ~ r acao $ (cec. w sa e I I .w~ ~ f Li // I i •rrhNxw$ H.. ~$~~$^~k~~~~N~~~ ~~Sm~6 9~n~ ( R :n a o 3N~ .c. ,cc .tt ,cc oc a ,c. cN ,Ic .wt ' - I ~ w , cox -8- ~- '_ r - -t-- A ~ -. _ ,M .tt JJC .ac .CG ac .X .a4 • • ~ . e _. _ i ~ ,- i ,tip ~k ~~ - ~ 8 t ..al ~_ . ~•. ~i• ~. ~~• ~. ~" .i n N ma .u+ m ~ i 6 rM~' $ - - ~ - ~ .rr ' 1 ' ~r I ° ~' ss~t.owt I $ ~' y $ N'8 ~ '$ ~tl~ ' ' $ ~ B . _ ~ i ~ . btS ! n -a .g tt§pg g .,N M S yy 8E B '4 a x a .a .cc ~.tt .rc .c ~ ~ oao - r o~~cj4 ~~ ~ - - - .s . H -~ .Mnr WCc .n n ,N . / ,tt ,a ,w as ac oc i h ~c~ , ~ s e~ ti39$ i it~ik ':•$ ~.:B s3sE: -•k Ro$ %+`aa_ ~... ng_. y~ ~~ g A - - ~ n ~ ~ i ~ 6 - r _ .co ro ~_ t 5-- F P _S ~• ° s It + - M b pi .06 .3 ~ I . 1 (. ,I 1 ~ RAM otL6 • q~ ^ ^ _ _ 1 .at N flu N an. y i~ I FI K 0 Nd~.cr~.W~ .9 .M .CI' :~ ~ .cif N ^ 4 I Ly i ,y y •~$ aw8 m-g $ p ''4$ ~`uit i ^ 1 ~ .W. ~ I ~~ rt F ^ ^ f „i Y. L. V !C ^ ~I I ~ R f- - - -~ ~ ~ f 'S ~ I ~ ~ l 'ON 'CQ1i ?OW]15717 ~ ~noz ~+uvx^nu ucruo n'^mn 1 ~ ""iN-TN rS7~+lo Figure 2: Site Plan • • STUDY AREA CONDITIONS Study Area The area of influence will be the western region of Meridian. The area of primary impact has been determined according to ACRD policy and includes segments of Pine Avenue, Black Cat Road and Franklin Road in the project vicinity. The intersections considered for impacts are the existing Pine Avenue /Black Cat Road intersection, the existing Franklin Road / Black Cat Road intersection and the new site access intersection with Pine Avenue. Land Use The project area is currently vacant. The site is proposed for residential use in accordance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. EXISTING CONDITIONS Traffic Volumes Existing average daily traffic (ADT) volumes and a.m. and p.m. peak hour turning movement volumes were obtained from August, 2011 traffic counts (see Appendix). The existing daily and peak hour traffic counts near the site are summarized in Figure 3. Road System The road system in the site vicinity is described below: • Pine Avenue is an east-west, two-lane facility classified as a collector by COMPASS. The roadway is not stripped but operates as a two-lane facility. The roadway width is sufficient to allow for a continuous center turn lane. Most of the roadway segment east of Black Cat Road is fully improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk. The posted speed limit is 35 MPH adjacent to the project site. • Black Cat Road is anorth-south, two-lane facility classified as a minor arterial by COMPASS. Black Cat Road has only limited improvements near the project site. The posted speed limit is 35 MPH north of Franklin Road. The signed speed limit increases to 45 MPH south of Franklin Road. • Franklin Road is a west-west two-lane facility classified as a principal arterial by COMPASS. The posted speed limit is 50 MPH in the vicinity of the project site. The intersections in the site vicinity are described below: • The intersection of Pine Avenue and Black Cat Road is currently atwo-way stop controlled intersection. The stop control is on the Pine Avenue approaches. Both roadways provide two travel lanes. None of the approaches have added left turn lanes. • The intersection of Franklin Road and Black Cot Road is currently an all-way stop controlled intersection. Both roadways provide two travel lanes. None of the approaches have added left or right turn lanes. • • PM 7 tsz 3a AM 8 174 14 hu bfl PM PM AM PM 40 8 bR A 9 14 2 2 twu tvu 2 2 9 1 ri IeR S5 35 bll MI AM 1 BO 26 P14 a zza w PINE AVE O 4 U U m FRANKLIN RD PIA 43 73 >s AM ,o ,~ M PAA PM AM PM B M 2B 173 78B 1H 1ru 4ru 86 20 B M Mt 8 tl Mt 4vu AM 31 1 H PM 17 n Za Figure 3: Existing Traffic Volumes STUDY PERIOD The build-out year for this study will be 2016. This date was selected to allow for project approval, engineering, construction, and full development of the site. The weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour periods were analyzed for site impacts. Typically the a.m. peak hour occurs between 6:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. The p.m. peak hour occurs between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. PROJECTED TRAFFIC Site Traffic Trip, Generation Site traffic generation is normally estimated by procedures recommended in the latest edition of the Trip Generation Manual (8'h Ed) published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Trip rates estimated in the manual are based on actual driveway traffic measurements performed on different land uses nationwide, particularly in metropolitan areas. New Table 1: Trip Generation Summery Caie~ory Sln~e ~~ Bona u:. coa. s~o Number of Untis 148 Trlp Generation Race 24hr daily rate 9.57 am peak hour rate 0.75 pm peak hour rate 1.01 Total Trlps GeneraFed 24-hr daily rate 1,416 am peak hour trips 111 m eak hour rate 149 Source: Trio Generation. Institute of Transportation Engineers, 8th Edition. The site trip generation is obtained by applying the trip rates from the Trip Generation Manual to each of the uses of the site development. Table 1 presents the summary of the site trip generation used in this report. The proposed development is projected to generate an ADT of 1,416 vehicles per day, of which the a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic is 111 and 149 vehicles per hour respectively. Trip Distribution ` Once the generated trips are estimated, they are distributed to their geographic origins or destinations and assigned to particular segments of the encompassed transportation network. The trip distribution along the roadway network and turning movement percentages were based on the COMPASS Regional Model. The distribution of the site traffic along the roadway network is given in Figure 4 in the form of percentages of total generated traffic for the site. Figure 5 illustrates the rounded internal site traffic distribution. Figure b presents the forecast site traffic on the external network. Figure 4: Site Trip Distribution `~. ~~: ~n N ~! ----- t' W ~i G W < l N 6 ~ v~ ,~ h MW~ ~f L'S aC ~ .,~ ~ ~~~ ~ ..-(-" 1 \/~ .-' ~_.. ~ ~ yi Y~~ -s ~ i •4~~ s ,y, gyg M ' ,^ ~~~ '~ ~`VC'9 ~~ ,~ .xu~ R ~~ R e 'n rwz$ ~i V ~ Y"M m00 •4.4 am f mn aooc y :~i i ~ .i et 1 «~g '~ v , ~ w ~Ow ~ ~n • •~~ `S .w ,~ ~ n ` ~~~ - _ i ±~ ,~ _ ~, 0 r~ i` ~s U F- J ~,q~. _ z („'~ `% ~r'~ G H v j ` ~ Z ~~ ~~ _ $ ~ q ~ ~ ~: ,.`, o ~ `~ U L Q. a Z {`~ ~ W rr} Z ~~ ~rQ. W =? L ~ ~ ~ G] a L r i., J `~ "~ ~~ ~~ C V i i7 ~ I~ ~ W F ~ :" l ~ rn W ;!~I i v 3AOi lWLV371S~1 ALSN]0 ~'M~7W • W ~/S / Z W ~7~ $ / ,~~' / h ,Y// M~~ r~ v~' r r T(t~ / / r ~' i °~ c3LLaldn~~ Figure 5: Internal Site Trip Distribution R5 A ~~ ~r~O~t are o o ~s nla o o a H I riru kR AM PM PM PM 0 0 IeR 17 0 0 0 Bru Cru 0 0 0 H kA OB BD 0 0 0 0 78 are o -0 0 0 h Mru AM PM AM 0 IIR 0 0 IMu tlru 0 0 28 W IeR 0 0 I txu ri PM 03 0 0 PM 52 0 0 PINE AVE D d U dU J FRANKLIN RD PM 8 4 28 AM 13 7 b fuu INt AM PM NM PM 4 18 IeR r 2 8 0 0 tru tlru 0 0 0 0 ri kR 0 0 bR tvu AM 0 18 0 PM 0 Bt 0 Figure 6: Peak Hour Site Traffic • • ~ a 17e sa zz rl Aru u4 w4 u`1 ~+ 4e e z z nru tlru z z 10 1 krt 130 e2 rrt a4 1 1a 81 PM 10 z62 147 ~ o 0 0 0 d nru Nn ,v4 PM PM 0 o brt 0 o Cru nru o 0 zs e7 w1 0 0 tru as es o 0 ant u o 0 PINE AVE Q 4 U Ud J m FRANKLIN RD PM ~ BD 118 PM 23B tlvu Idl PAI PM AA1 PM 14 Mfl r 187 ltru Bru 0D b 10 ri NR 9 52 AM 24 78 PM 20 144 b Figure 7: Peak Hour Build Out Traffic • Background Traffic The background (no-build) traffic volumes are calculated to account for the increase in traffic on the vicinity roadways due to development and the natural growth in traffic. The background traffic volumes were assumed to increase by 3~ per year. The traffic generated from the adjacent project is also included in the peak hour and daily background traffic numbers. The background traffic numbers are used for the Background Year 2016 analysis. Total Traffic The site traffic is added to the background traffic to obtain the total build-out traffic for the Year 2016. The combined volumes for the 2016 background a.m. and p.m. peak hours were added to the forecast a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes generated by the project site and are shown in Figure 7. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Capacity Analysis and Level-of-Service An intersection capacity analysis was performed existing, 2016 background, and 2016 build-out conditions using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS+) based on the 2000 edition of the Highway Capacity Manual. The existing traffic control was assumed to be in place for Year 2016 conditions. The results of the area's capacity analysis are summarized below in Table 2. Table 2: Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary Miersecron Peak Moor TrodNt: COntol AM 9.0 A Pine at Notel PM Two-Way Stop 9.3 A AM 11.5 B 12.3 B 14.3 B Pine at Black Cat PM Two-way Stop 13.3 B 14.7 B 19.2 C AM 10.6 B 12.1 B FrankinatBlackCat PM AI~WayStop 138 B 35,5 E AM A~-WayStop 11.8 B 12.7 B Franklin at Black Cai pM - Improved ~ 1} 16.4 C 18.7 C fie lOS for a two-way stop references the minor street approach. fie major sheet does not stop. j l) W Ith an added westbound right turn lane The intersection of Pine Avenue and Black Cat Road is currently atwo-way stop controlled intersection. The stop control is on the Pine Avenue approaches. Both roadways provide two travel lanes. None of the approaches have added leff turn lanes. This intersection currently operates at LOS B during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours respectively. For the Year 2016 background condition (i.e. regional growth but without the site-generated traffic), the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS B during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. No improvements are needed to accommodate the existing or background traffic volumes. For the Year 2016 build out condition (i.e. background regional growth plus the site- generated traffic), the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS B and C during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. No additional improvements are needed to accommodate • • the build out traffic volumes. The intersection does not warrant a southbound left turn lane in Black Cat Road. The intersection of Franklin Road and Black Cat Road is currently an all-way stop controlled intersection. Both roadways provide two travel lanes. None of the approaches have added left or right turn lanes. This intersection currently operates at LOS B during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours respectively. For the Year 2016 background condition (i.e. regional growth but without the site-generated traffic), the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS B and E during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Improvements are needed to accommodate the background traffic volumes. The addition of a westbound right turn lane will improve the intersection operations to LOS B and C during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. For the Year 2016 build out condition (i.e. background regional growth plus the site- generated traffic), the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS B and C during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with the improvement needed to accommodate the background traffic volumes. No addffional improvements are needed to accommodate the build out traffic volumes. The site plan shows a new site access on Pine Avenue, approximately 425-ft east of west site boundary. This new access was constructed by as part of the adjacent subdivision. The driveway separation meets current ACRD policy fora 330-ft separation from an adjacent intersection (Policy Manual Section 7206.4.5). Roadway Capacity The peak hour planning development thresholds for arterial and collector streets are as follows: • A 2-lane arterial road (Black Cat Road and Franklin Road) is 550 vehicles per hour at LOS D and 690 at LOS E. • A 2-lane collector road (Pine Avenue) is 425 vehicles per hour at LOS D and 525 at LOS E. Table 3 on the next page summarizes the existing and future peak hour traffic projections and daily capacity requirements on roadways within the vicinity of the site. The forecast peak hour build-out volumes on the study area roadways are all less than the planning development thresholds. None of the study area roadways require expansion to accommodate the site generated traffic volumes. Site Access and Circulation Only one new site access is planned for the project. The site also has two existing stub streets connecting to the subdivision to the west. The site plan shows a new site access on Pine Avenue, approximately 425-ft east of west site boundary. This new access was constructed by as part of the adjacent subdivision. The driveway separation meets current ACRD policy fora 330-ft separation from an adjacent intersection (Policy Manual Section 7206.4.5). • Under build out conditions the intersection will operate at LOS A during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours as an unsignalized intersection. This intersection does not meet current ACHD policy for an added westbound right turn lane. Pine Avenue does not extend east of the project site and there are no westbound traffic volumes. Table 3: PM Peak Hour Existing and Future Traffic Projectiotts on Vicinity Roadways location TraNl Direcfan 2011 Traffic PAiI Paak Har Za18 ProjaC:t Traffic 2016 Bugd dut VoNtrrle PWNfittp TixeMtold (L05 D- 2 Wr) Plrlrtinp 11riMt1olit (LAB E - 2 tan Pine N Black Cat EB 92 107 97 204 425 525 WB 51 59 52 111 425 525 w/ Black Cat EB 11 13 0 13 425 525 WB 18 21 0 21 425 525 Black Cat Road N Pine NB 248 287 1D 298 550 890 SB 189 219 19 239 550 690 al Pine NB 295 342 78 420 550 890 SB 188 218 41 259 550 890 sJ FraMdn NB 302 350 78 428 550 690 SB 127 147 4 151 550 690 FrankFn Roed e/ Black Cast EB 239 277 29 308 550 890 WB 476 552 8 580 550 680 wV Black Cat EB 205 238 16 253 550 690 WB 321 372 8 3B0 550 890 3% annual growth rate Estimated from the peak hour wNames " The COMPASS model output is sha~un in the Appendix TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES This project is expected to generate approximately $650,000 in impact fee revenues to the Ada County Highway District under the requirements of Ordinance 208. Table 4 illustrates the impact fee calculation. CONCLUSIONS Land Use Amount Fee Rate Impact Fse Single Family Homes 148 $3,787 $560,000 Total Impact Fees (estimated) $560,000 Based upon Ordinance 208 The following are the principal conclusions of the traffic analysis for the Chesterfield development. 1) The proposed development is projected to generate an average daily traffic (ADT) volume of 1,416 vehicles of which the a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic is 111 and 149 vehicles per hour respectively. 2) As a result of the site build-out, traffic on the area roadways is expected to increase in the vicinity. Traffic on Pine Avenue may increase by 1,416 trips per day east of Black Cat Road. Traffic on Black Cat Road may increase by 283 trips per day south of Pine Avenue and 1,133 trips per day south of Pine Avenue. • • 3) The intersection of Pine Avenue and Black Cat Road is currently atwo-way stop controlled intersection. The stop control is on the Pine Avenue approaches. Both roadways provide two travel lanes. None of the approaches have added left turn lanes. This intersection currently operates at LOS B during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours respectively. For the Year 2016 background condition (i.e. regional growth but without the site-generated traffic), the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS B during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. No improvements are needed to accommodate the existing or background traffic volumes. For the Year 2016 build out condition (i.e. background regional growth plus the site- generated traffic), the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS B and C during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. No additional improvements are needed to accommodate the build out traffic volumes. The intersection does not warrant a southbound left turn lane in Black Cat Road. 4) The intersection of Franklin Road and Black Cat Road is currently an all-way stop controlled intersection. Both roadways provide two travel lanes. None of the approaches have added left or right turn lanes. This intersection currently operates at LOS B during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours respectively. For the Year 2016 background condition (i.e. regional growth but without the site-generated traffic), the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS B and E during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Improvements are needed to accommodate the background traffic volumes. The addition of a westbound right turn lane will improve the intersection operations to LOS B and C during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. For the Year 2016 build out condition (i.e. background regional growth plus the site- generated traffic), the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS B and C during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with the improvement needed to accommodate the background traffic volumes. No additional improvements are needed to accommodate the build out traffic volumes. 5) The site plan shows a new sffe access on Pine Avenue, approximately 425-ft east of west site boundary. This new access was constructed by as part of the adjacent subdivision. The driveway separation meets current ACRD policy fora 330-ft separation from a signalized intersection (Policy Manual Section 7206.4.5). Under build out conditions the intersection will operate at LOS A during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours as an unsignalized intersection. This intersection does not meet current ACRD policy for an added westbound right turn lane. Pine Avenue does not extend east of the project site and there are no westbound traffic volumes. 6) The forecast peak hour build-out volumes (Year 2016) for Pine Avenue, Black Cat Road and Franklin Road are all lower than the planning development thresholds in the vicinity of the project. None of the study area roadways require further expansion to accommodate the site generated traffic volumes. 7) This project is expected to generate approximately $560,000 in impact fee revenues to the Ada County Highway District under the requirements of Ordinance 208. Following are the transportation-related improvements needed to accommodate the traffic volumes generated by the Chesterfield development: • • • No traffic-related improvements have been identified with this analysis. The following improvement is needed to increase capacity at the Franklin Road /Black Cat Road intersection but is not required by the traffic generated by the proposed development. • Construct a westbound right turn lane at the Franklin Road intersection with Black Cat Road. Only 9.4% of the p.m. peak hour trafl=lc volumes are attributed to the Chesterfield project. • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed Chesterfield subdivision is a residential development located south of Pine Avenue and east of Black Cat Road in Meridian, Idaho. This project is planned to include 148 single family homes on an 8.2 acres. This project was originally submitted as a preliminary plat and development application in 2003. The original project was never constructed. The new site plan has a reduced number of lots and this traffic analysis is an update of that original analysis. The following are the principal conclusions of the traffic analysis for the Cheste~eld development. 1) The proposed development is projected to generate an average daily traffic (ADT) volume of 1,416 vehicles of which the a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic is 111 and 149 vehicles per hour respectively. 2) As a result of the site build-out, traffic on the area roadways is expected to increase in the vicinity. Traffic on Pine Avenue may increase by 1,416 trips per day east of Black Cat Road. Traffic on Black Cat Road may increase by 283 trips per day south of Pine Avenue and 1,133 trips per day south of Pine Avenue. 3) The intersection of Pine Avenue and Black Cat Road is currently atwo-way stop controlled intersection. The stop control is on the Pine Avenue approaches. Both roadways provide two travel lanes. None of the approaches have added left turn lanes. This intersection currently operates at LOS B during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours respectively. For the Year 2016 background condition (i.e. regional growth but without the site-generated traffic), the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS B during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. No improvements are needed to accommodate the existing or background traffic volumes. For the Year 2016 build out condition (i.e. background regional growth plus the site- generated traffic), the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS 8 and C during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. No additional improvements ore needed to accommodate the build out traffic volumes. The intersection does not warrant a southbound left turn lane in Black Cat Road (see Appendix). 4) The intersection of Franklin Road and Black Cat Road is currently an all-way stop controlled intersection. Both roadways provide two travel lanes. None of the approaches have added left or right turn lanes. This intersection currently operates at LOS B during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours respectively. For the Year 2016 background condition (i.e. regional growth but without the site-generated traffic), the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS B and E during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Improvements are needed to accommodate the background traffic volumes. The addition of a westbound right turn lane will improve the intersection operations to LOS B and C during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. For the Year 2016 build out condition (i.e. background regional growth plus the site- generated traffic), the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS B and C during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with the improvement needed to accommodate the • CJ background traffic volumes. No additional improvements are needed to accommodate the build out traffic volumes. 5) The site plan shows a new site access on Pine Avenue, approximately 425-ft east of west site boundary. This new access was constructed by as part of the adjacent subdivision. The driveway separation meets current ACRD policy fora 330-ft separation from an adjacent intersection (Policy Manual Section 7206.4.5). Under build out conditions the intersection will operate at LOS A during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours as an unsignalized intersection. This intersection does not meet current ACHD policy for an added westbound right turn lane. Pine Avenue does not extend east of the project site and there are no westbound traffic volumes. 6) The forecast peak hour build-out volumes (Year 2016) for Pine Avenue, Black Cat Road and Franklin Road are all lower than the planning development thresholds in the vicinity of the project. None of the study area roadways require further expansion to accommodate the site generated traffic volumes. 7) This project is expected to generate approximately $560,000 in impact fee revenues to the Ada County Highway District under the requirements of Ordinance 208. Following are the transportation-related improvements needed to accommodate the traffic volumes generated by the Chesterfield development: • No traffic-related improvements have been identified with this analysis. The following improvement is needed to increase capacity at the Franklin Road /Black Cat Road intersection but is not required by the traffic generated by the proposed development. • Construct a westbound right turn lane at the Franklin Road intersection with Black Cat Road. Only 9.4% of the p.m. peak hour traffic volumes are attributed to the Cheste~eld project. • • REFERENCES "Trip Generation 8th Edition," by Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington D.C., 2003. "Highway Capacity Manual" Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C. "Development Policy Manual," City of Meridian. "Development Policy Manual," Ada County Highway District. "NCHRP 279, Intersection Channelization Guide," Transportation Research Board. 2002 • • APPENDIX Traffic Counts • VI N a~o ~ N 4~ H ao N n cd+ ~-1 ~ 4 h m H M a N H ~ tv'J n 0 H m H d c .~ a _+ O A N q O ~n O raqni C~ ~n O v~ Q~ v~ a V ~ b ~D r n n n c3 w Y A ~ Q. ~ m Q v+ `~ ~ ~ h y T a ~ ~O l0 ~O i'~ h w u 'a d ~ ~ a r ' V aL a ~ ~ o a ~ ~~~~~~ °; Y M M a a M a A N ~ ee-~ _ ~ ~ ~1 r O@ f 1 H O~~ ~ c ~1 .~1 z Y'i .X H q u a t ~"'~ H O O H G1 H H ~ y T ~nrrnavrvHa H H H H H H O H N N a H tw tlb C H N m H H 0 0 0 L r p W .t ui .o ~ p O h N N +-~ O N M r~ .~ O Q1 U1 ~i N Or r lD h t3 M /~ 40 M M M H N H nJ V Y1 a .r a 4 v+aa.ohooam ,~ ~ N H m Qi M {~ N H H H H H N fJ N N M o Hoooo.-+-+ H H O H N N a H N pl H r N m ~n an Y N M M a CO ,~ V a .n .n a .n E A o ~ ~' EN^'oeMV°'D ~ ~ H .-I i .'~ ~ e c N H _ 9 W a v L .~ ~R H N m H .-1 0 0 0 r ~O vi O Ol ~ ~ ~ H Q H O ® O Q H C H H O O H O H N ~ p W N H O N m N .-~ O H O N H N N N .-~ Ly L M Q a ~ m N N N 7 e n M a in ~n ~v -+ r h H b h rn a ao r .+ a r H -~ .+ .-+ Z ~ ttpp N M n M N V a ~O L tt l3 H H O H N N a H N H N a v~ a .+ a M a N H DD N T V1 ~/y M h H J1 N N f0 O r N M ra o+ o Q M ~~ O N O N N C~ ~n o vi .n o v~ an o a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n t E o v t.. ~ a • C O M .N, OD M N N M T f•/ ~-1 ~ ~ ~ ~ M N O ~O n~ .y ~ a n W JI H fJ N G A ^y v1 Y. 0 A J ~ r M O v1 G1 ] 1!'1 ~ 1f1 C7 ~ a Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~tlDn n - n ~ Sao b ~ 4 m 4 ~n n ~ ~ ~ a V y ~ ~ ~ u d u o u " 4 y C O O _. v v ~ t- O U r n ra M N O W Y Vl Q V1 f~l ~ M .r v, .o .O a ~ o ~ M1 n Q1 V1 1~ M ~ ~ ~~ W Vt S!1 .-~ H , ,~ N ~ ~ H q v a r .~ N O w ti W m tS1 W .-~ .-y w N w N L 7~ 3 O O M M O N N V O N O .-~ M p~ 0 0 .~ fryy ~p M el r, K ~ 1f1 R '1 ~ e U N M 4 YJ O O O O rJ .-~ rJ m yA+ s N M N 1C ~ n l(.1 pp V1 H n N ~D ~ .-~ N N si r-1 tt Tr n ~p ~ h n1 a{ 00 M -~ •1 M M ~T M M t!1 V v M M ~ ~ ~ h ~+ m ui w n ,w oo v ao ..i H -0 O q m .-. M M op n ... m y .+ a oa m w w .n M N M I!9 1L1 N 05 O~ Y H N N W W t0 ,~wcamrnrn a. u a ~ ~°- ~ Qp1 OtO Nn-~ NN} O~ M N A u a ~ r1 ~O ~O Q~ n m c} N J M M ~J M t} 't t .~ {Q Q1 M N M h n N ~ N'1 4 tD ~O 9 W ~O 10 V . 3 V1 1!1 10 00 h Ot r! OD ti ti ~ Vl !- M N M N N t m .C 'p V m m m y m N L` P A W 00 H n rn m m 00 in H '+ .-, e} ~D V1 n Op N t0 O ti N efa.on~ae vm .-1 N .-1 N N N p N N 00 h N O h M .ti PI N H ~i ry H N N .j .ti ~p M W M ~ V~ r ~ . -amn..wM.+~ ,-~ .-1 N rJ N N v et n •t M ~n a V n N ti N ~ ~ VJ O~ N V T O rl H h fJ ~ ~ iD 4 M n H n M1 0 M f~ N ~o n m a <~~~~~~~ .n r~ ~ vi o ~ v v ~ ~ ~ ~ Q 4 _ S C A N i- r° a Capacity Analysis -Existing Conditions • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: DBS Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 8/11/ 2011 Analysis Time Period: AM Pe ak Hour Intersection: Pine at Black Cat Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Exist ing 2011 Project ID: East/West Street: Pine North/South Street: Black Cat Intersection Orientation: N S Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehic le Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 ? 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1 90 25 14 174 8 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 100 27 15 193 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street; Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 55 2 9 40 2 9 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 61 2 10 44 2 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (~) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/S torage Yes /0 No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Approach Movement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 - 7 8 9 I ZO 11 12 LTR LTR I LTR I LTR v (vph) 1 15 73 56 C(m) (vph) 1383 1472 626 627 v/c 0.00 0.01 0.12 0.09 95% queue length 0.00 0.03 0.39 0.29 Control Delay 7.6 7.5 11.5 11.3 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 11.5 11.3 Approach LOS B B • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: DBS Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 8/11/2011 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Pine at Black Cat Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Existing 2011 Project ID: East/West Street: Pine North/South Street: Black Cat Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustme nts Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 9 226 60 30 152 7 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 251 66 33 168 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 35 2 14 8 2 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 38 2 15 $ 2 1 Fercent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (~) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Yes /0 No Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 LTR LTR I LTR I LTR 10 33 55 11 1414 1255 496 445 0.01 0.03 0.11 0.02 0.02 0.08 0.37 0.08 7.6 7.9 13.2 13.3 A A B B 13.2 13.3 B B 12 • ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DBS Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 8/11/2011 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: Franklin at Black Cat Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2011 Existing Project ID: East/West Street: Franklin North/South Street: Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Eastbound 1 Westbound I Northbound ( Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R i Volume 18 198 20 18 85 26 121 51 43 (lbb 40 25 ~ Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Flow Rate 250 130 126 255 g Heavy Veh 3 3 4 4 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 Opposing-Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting-lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry group 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Workshee t 3 - Saturat ion Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Ll L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 250 130 126 255 Left-Turn 8 8 23 184 Right-Turn 22 28 47 27 Prop. Left-Turns 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.7 Prop. Right-Turns 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.1 Prop. Heavy Vehic1e 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 1 1 1 1 Adjustments Exhibit 17-33: hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 - 0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 0.1 Work sheet 4 - Dep arture Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Ll L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 Ll L2 Flow rate 250 130 126 255 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 • • x, initial 0.22 0.12 0.11 hd, final value 5.15 5.27 5.22 x, final value 0.36 0.19 0.18 Move-up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 3.2 3.3 3.2 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service_ Eastbound Westbound Northbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 250 130 126 Service Time 3.2 3.3 3.2 Utilization, x 0.36 0.19 0.18 Dep. headway, hd 5.15 5.27 5.22 Capacity 500 380 376 Delay 11.00 9.51 9.38 LOS B A A Southbound L1 L2 255 3.3 0.37 5.27 505 11.39 B Approach: Delay 11.00 9.51 9.38 11.39 LOS B A A B Intersection Delay 10.61 Intersection LOS B 0.23 5.27 0.37 2.0 3.3 • ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DBS Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 8/11/_'011 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Franklin at Black Cat Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2011 Existing Project ID: East/West Street: Franklin North/South Street: Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I Volume 152 144 9 145 258 73 117 77 20 -75 73 46 I Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Flow Rate 227 417 125 215 Heavy Veh 3 3 4 4 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 Opposing-Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting-lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry group 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Workshee t 3 - Saturat ion Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 227 417 125 215 Left-Turn 57 50 18 83 Right-Turn 10 81 22 51 Prop. Left-Turns 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.4 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 Prop. Heavy Vehic1e 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 1 1 1 1 Adjustments Exhibit 17-33: hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 - 0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.1 -0.0 -0.0 0.0 Work sheet 4 - Dep arture Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Ll L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow rate 227 417 125 215 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.20 0.37 0.11 0.19 • • hd, final value 5.74 5.33 6.17 x, final value 0.36 0.62 0.21 Move-up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 3.7 3.3 4.2 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service_ Eastbound Westbound Northbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 227 417 125 Service Time 3.7 3.3 4.2 Utilization, x 0.36 0.62 0.21 Dep. headway, hd 5.74 5.33 6.17 Capacity 477 649 375 Delay 11.97 16.54 10.84 LOS B C B Approach: Delay 11.97 16.54 10.84 LOS B C B Intersection Delay 13.82 Intersection LOS B 5.97 0.36 ~.0 4.0 Southbound L1 L2 215 4.0 0.36 5.97 465 12.24 B 12.24 B Capacity Analysis -Background Conditions • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: DBS Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 8/11/2011 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: Pine at Black Cat Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Background 2016 Project ID: East/West Street: Pine North/South Street: Black Cat Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 ^_ 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1 104 29 16 202 9 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 115 32 17 224 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R ( L T R Volume 64 2 10 46 2 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 71 2 11 51 2 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (~) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Yes /0 No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Approach Movement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 LTR LTR - LTR ( LTR 12 v (vph) 1 17 84 64 C(m) (vph) 1345 1447 577 580 v/c 0.00 0.01 0.15 0.11 95~ queue length 0.00 0.04 0.51 0.37 Control Delay 7.7 7.5 12.3 12.0 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 12.3 12.0 Approach LOS B B ~ s TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: DBS Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 8/11/2011 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Pine at Black Cat Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Background 2016 Project ID: East/West Street: Pine North/South Street: Black Cat Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R i L T R Volume 10 262 70 35 176 8 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 291 77 38 195 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undi vided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 41 2 16 9 2 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 45 2 17 10 2 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade ($) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Yes /0 No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Approach Movement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 LTR LTR ( LTR ( LTR v (vph) 11 38 64 13 C(m) (vph) 1381 1202 436 385 v/c 0,01 0.03 0.15 0.03 95$ queue length 0.02 0.10 0.51 0.10 Control Delay 7,6 8.1 14.7 14.7 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 14.7 14.7 Approach LOS B B • ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DBS Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 8/11/2011 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Franklin at Black Cat Jurisdiction: Units: U. S, Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Background Project ID: East/West Street: Franklin North/South Street: Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R Volume 160 167 10 152 299 '_OZ f20 89 23 (87 85 53 $ Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Flow Rate 262 612 145 2.48 $ Heavy Veh 3 3 4 4 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 Opposing-Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting-lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry group 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L"1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 262 612 145 248 Left-Turn 66 57 22 96 Right-Turn 11 223 25 5$ Prop. Left-Turns 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.4 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.2 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 1 1 1 1 Adjustments Exhibit 17-33: hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 - 0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.1 -0.1 -0.0 0.0 Work sheet 4 - Dep arture Headway and Service Time Eastbound Wes tbound Northbound Sout hbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow rate 262 612 145 248 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.23 0.54 0.13 0.22 • hd, final value x, final value Move-up time, Service Time 6.70 5.81 0.49 0.99 m 2.0 2.0 4.7 3.8 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level Eastbound Westbound L1 L2 Ll L2 • 7.38 0.30 2.0 5.4 of Service_ Northbound L1 L2 Flow Rate 262 612 145 Service Time 4.7 3.8 5.4 Utilization, x 0.49 0.99 0.30 Dep. headway, hd 6.70 5.81 7.38 Capacity 512 619 395 Delay 15.90 56.85 13.47 LOS C F B Southbound L1 L2 248 5.0 0.48 7.03 491 16.44 C Approach: Delay 15.90 56.85 13.47 16.44 LOS C F B C Intersection Delay 35.51 Intersection LOS E 7.03 0.48 2.0 5.0 • Capacity Analysis -Build Out Conditions • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: DBS Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 8/11!2011 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: Pine at Notel Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Build Out 2016 Project ID: East/West Street: Pine North/South Street: Notel Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 26 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 28 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 83 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 92 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Percent Grade ($) Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 0 Configuration Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95v queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 0 0.90 0 0 0 No 0 LR 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 LT I LR I 0 92 1599 992 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.31 7.3 9.0 A A 9.0 A • • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: DBS Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 8/11/2011 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Pine at Notel Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Build Out 2016 Project ID: East/West Street: Pine North/South Street: Notel Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 97 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 107 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 52 0 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 57 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (~) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists ?/Storage No / / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB No rthbound Southbound Movement 1 4 ( 7 8 9 ( 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I LR i v {vph) 0 57 C{m) (vph) 1497 895 v/c 0.00 0.06 95o queue length 0.00 0.20 Control Delay 7.4 9.3 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.3 Approach LOS A • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: DBS Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 8/11/2011 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: Pine at Black Cat Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Build Out 2016 Project ID: East/West Street: Pine North/South Street: Black Cat Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustme nts Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R i L T R Volume 1 104 51 22 202 9 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 115 56 24 224 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Movement Westbound 7 8 L T 9 R I 10 I L Eastbound 11 T 12 R Volume 130 2 27 46 2 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 144 2 30 51 2 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Yes /0 No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95o queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 LTR LTR I LTR I LTR 1 24 176 64 1345 1418 564 540 0.00 0.02 0.31 0.12 0.00 0.05 1.32 0.40 7.7 7.6 14.3 12.6 A A B B 14.3 12.6 B B 12 • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: DBS Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 8/11/ 2011 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Pine at Black Cat Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Build Out 2016 Project ID: East/West Street: Pine North/South Street: Black Cat Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehic le Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 10 262 147 54 176 8 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 291 163 60 195 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 82 2 27 9 2 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 91 2 30 10 2 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (~) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Yes /0 No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Approach Movement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 LTR LTR I LTR ( LTR v (vph) 11 60 123 13 C(m) (vph) 1381 1117 375 322 v/c 0.01 0.05 0.33 0.04 95~ queue length 0.02 0.17 1.40 0.13 Control Delay 7.6 8.4 19.2 16.6 LOS A A C C Approach Delay 19.2 16.6 Approach LOS C C • ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DBS Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 8/11/2011 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: Franklin at Black Cat Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Build Out Project ID: East/West Street: Franklin North/South Street: Black Cat Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I Volume 114 230 23 19 99 32 124 75 50 -239 53 0 I °s Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Flow Rate 295 155 164 323 ~ Heavy Veh 3 3 4 4 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 Opposing-Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting-lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry group 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Workshee t 3 - Saturat ion Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Ll L2 Li L2 L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 295 155 164 323 Left-Turn 15 10 26 265 Right-Turn 25 35 55 0 Prop. Left-Turns 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.8 Prop. Right-Turns 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.0 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 1 1 1 1 Adjustments Exhibit 17-33: hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 0.2 Worksheet 4 - Dep arture Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 Ll L2 Flow rate 295 155 164 323 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.26 0.14 0.15 0.29 • • hd, final value 5.66 5.86 5.76 5.78 x, final value 0.46 0.25 0.26 0.52 Move-up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 3.7 3.9 3.8 3.8 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 Flow Rate 295 155 164 323 Service Time 3.7 3.9 3.8 3.8 Utilization, x 0.46 0.25 0.26 0.52 Dep, headway, hd 5.66 5.86 5.76 5.78 Capacity 545 405 414 573 Delay 13.47 10.82 10.80 14.82 LOS B B B B Approach: Delay 13.47 10.82 10.80 14.82 LOS B B B B Intersection Delay 13.03 Intersection LOS B • ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DBS Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 8/11/2011 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Franklin at Black Cat Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Build Out Project ID: East/West Street: Franklin North/South Street: Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Westbound - Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 176 167 10 152 299 208 120 144 23 1116 89 62 Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Flow Rate 280 620 207 294 Heavy Veh 3 3 4 4 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 Opposing-Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting-lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry group 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 280 620 207 294 Left-Turn 84 57 22 128 Right-Turn 11 231 25 68 Prop. Left-Turns 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.4 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.2 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 1 1 1 1 Adjustments Exhibit 17-33: hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 - 0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.1 -0.2 0.0 0.0 Work sheet 4 - Dep arture Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Flow rate 280 620 207 294 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.25 0.55 0.18 0.26 • hd, final value 7.46 6.55 7.89 7.55 x, final value 0.58 1.13 0.45 0.62 Move-up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 5.5 4.5 5.9 5.6 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 280 620 207 294 Service Time 5.5 4.5 5.9 5.6 Utilization, x 0.58 1.13 0.45 0.62 Dep. headway, hd 7.46 6.55 7.89 7.55 Capacity 460 620 426 459 Delay 20.27 102.64 17.29 21.94 LOS C F C C Approach: Delay 20.47 102.64 17.29 21.94 LOS C F C C Intersection Delay 56.63 Intersection LOS F • ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DBS Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 8/11/2011 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: Franklin at Black Cat Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Background - Improved Project ID: East/West Street: Franklin North/South Street: Black Cat Worksheet ? - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R ( L T R I L T R I I I I I I Volume 19 230 23 19 99 30 i24 59 50 1192 46 29 $ Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LT LTR LTR PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Flow Rate 290 120 146 296 g Heavy Veh 3 3 4 4 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 Opposing-Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting-lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry group 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 290 120 146 296 Left-Turn 10 10 26 213 Right-Turn 25 0 55 32 Prop. Left-Turns 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.7 Prop. Right-Turns 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 Prop. Heavy Vehic1e 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 1 1 1 1 Adjustments Exhibit 17-33: hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 - 0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.0 0.1 -0.1 0.1 Warksheet 4 - Dep arture Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Ll L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Flow rate 290 120 146 296 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.26 0.11 0.13 0.26 • • hd, final value 5.37 5.73 5.46 x, final value 0.43 0.19 0.22 Move-up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 3.4 3.7 3.5 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service_ Eastbound Westbound Northbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flaw Rate 290 120 146 Service Time 3.4 3.7 3.5 Utilization, x 0.43 0.19 0.22 Dep. headway, hd 5.37 5.73 5.46 Capacity 540 370 396 Delay 12.41 10.08 10.01 LOS B B B Approach: Delay 12.41 10.08 10.01 LOS B B B Intersection Delay 11.82 Intersection LOS B 5.47 0.45 2.0 3.5 Southbound L1 L2 296 3.5 0.45 5.47 546 12.85 B 12.85 B • • ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DBS Agency/Co.; Date Performed: 8/11/2011 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Franklin at Black Cat Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Xear: 2016 Background Improved Project ID: East/West Street: Franklin North/South Street: Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics i Eastbound - Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 160 167 10 -52 299 201 120 89 23 187 85 53 Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LT R LTR LTR PHF 0.90 0.90 1.00 0.90 0.90 Flow Rate 262 389 201 145 248 ~ Heavy Veh 3 3 0 4 4 No, Lanes 1 2 1 1 Opposing-Lanes 2 1 1 1 Conflicting-lanes 1 1 2 2 Geometry group 4a 5 2 Z Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Worksheet 3 - Saturat ion Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 262 389 201 145 248 Left-Turn 66 57 0 22 96 Right-Turn 11 0 201 25 58 Prop. Left-Turns 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.2 0.2 Prop. Heavy Vehicle0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 4a 5 2 2 Adjustments Exhibit 17-33: hLT-adj 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.7 -0.6 - 0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.1 0.1 -0.7 -0.0 0.0 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow rate 262 389 201 145 248 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.23 0.35 0.18 0.13 0.22 hd, final value x, final value Move-up time, Service Time C~ J 6.41 6.47 5.63 6.84 0.47 0.70 0.31 0.28 2.0 2.3 2.0 4.4 4.2 3.3 4.8 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service_ Eastbound Wes tbound Northbound L1 L2 L1 L2 m L1 L2 Flow Rate 262 389 201 145 Service Time 4.4 4.2 3.3 4.8 Utilization, x 0.47 0.70 0.31 0.28 Dep. headway, hd 6.41 6.47 5.63 6.84 Capacity 512 544 451 395 Delay 14.90 22.84 10.90 1'.43 LOS B C B B Approach: Delay 14.90 18.77 12.43 LOS B C B Intersection Delay 16.43 Int ersection LOS C 6.54 0.45 2.0 4.5 Southbound L1 L2 248 4.5 0.45 6.54 498 14.81 B 14.81 B • ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DBS Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 8/11/2011 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hou r Intersection: Franklin at Black Cat Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Build Out Improved Project ID: East/West Street: Franklin North/South Street: Black Cat Worksheet 2 - Volume Adj ustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Wes tbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R - L T R I L T R I I I I I I Volume 114 230 23 19 99 32 124 75 50 1239 53 0 I ~ Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L"1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LT LTR LTR PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Flow Rate 295 120 164 323 ~ Heavy Veh 3 3 4 4 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 Opposing-Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting-lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry group 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Worksheet 3 - Saturati on Headway Ad justment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 295 120 164 323 Left-Turn 15 10 26 265 Right-Turn 25 0 55 0 Prop. Left-Turns 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.8 Prop. Right-Turns 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 Prop. Heavy Vehic1e0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 1 1 1 1 Adjustments Exhibit 17-33: hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.0 0.1 -0.1 0.2 Worksheet 4 - Depa rture Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Flow rate Z95 120 164 323 hd, initial value 3.20 3,20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.26 0.11 0.15 0.29 • • hd, final value 5.56 5.95 5.62 5.65 x, final value 0.46 0.20 0.26 0.51 Move-up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 3.6 4.0 3.6 3.7 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 295 120 164 323 Service Time 3.6 4.0 3.6 3.7 Utilization, x 0.46 0.20 0.26 0.51 Dep. headway, hd 5.56 5.95 5.62 5.65 Capacity 545 370 414 573 Delay 13.12 10.42 10.54 14.32 LOS B B B B Approach: Delay 13.12 10.42 10.54 14.32 LOS B B B B Intersection Delay 12.72 Intersection LOS B ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: DBS Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 8/11/2011 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Franklin at Black Cat Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Build Out Improved Project ID: East/West Street: Franklin North/South Street: Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Westbound { Northbound { Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R Volume (76 167 10 (52 299 208 120 144 23 1116 89 62 ~ Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LT LTR LTR PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Flow Rate 280 389 207 294 o Heavy Veh 3 3 4 4 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 Opposing-Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting-lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry group 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Workshee t 3 - Saturat ion Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 280 389 207 294 Left-Turn 84 57 22 128 Right-Turn 11 0 25 68 Prop. Left-Turns 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.4 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 1 1 1 1 Adjustments Exhibit 17-33: hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 - 0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 Work sheet 4 - Dep arture Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Ll L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 Ll L2 Flow rate 280 389 207 294 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.25 0.35 0.18 0.26 hd, final value 6.71 6.44 6.99 x, final value 0.52 0.70 0.40 Move-up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 4.7 4.4 5.0 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service_ Eastbound Westbound Northbound L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 280 389 207 Service Time 4.7 4.4 5.0 Utilization, x 0.52 0.70 0.40 Dep. headway, hd 6.71 6.44 6.99 Capacity 488 531 442 Delay 16.80 22.90 14.60 LOS C C B Southbound L1 L2 294 4.7 0.55 6.73 487 17.63 C Approach: Delay 16.80 22.90 14.60 17.63 LOS C C B C Intersection Delay 18.65 Intersection LOS C 6.73 0.55 2.0 4.7 • LEFT TURN NOMOGRAPH - Pine Avenue at Black Cat Road - • • D. G O d' O L C.. .~.. v t!J d LL E N ,~ %~ J O L A 0 4-~ C '~ ~v ~ ~~ '~ (.7 `' a~ c m J C L Q~ J C ~ ~ J ~ 3 L _ ~ C Q ~ ~ a ''' 3 ~. . tV ~ c i. Q N 2 !~ ~~ ~.. x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 0 .. ~ ~ Z Z n n n n n n n o Ob h+ 97 4l V M ~~ ~ ~1f~i~ `t~Al awnioA Bu;saidp n r~ t- U n V ~~ U ~, O n hs A L d d E 0 c .~ c a • • COMPASS Data • 2016 Peak Hour Demand • i Gh4Ry Ln. ~ ~ ~ p isy, sJd a S`_+ti ~.: a r.:~'= Sit =ti~1 X37 ~ dt? z, S ~ ~ ~ 7 Q ~ ~ ~ a ~yy V 'n R i y 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ V7 v'ne St a ~ 111 `~ ! I P112 St ~ -~ Pipe S1 ; s Pine St w 110 V Q D •~ ~ M ~tasdcfin f2d. Fr'~(1 Rd- FranFcbn Rd ~ rn :1v .:i'.:z 3-0S ~~ `'3 595 821' 1065 v m • ~~ 2016 Official Model Numbers E "henry Ln. 'c' 0. , C7alRy N. ". ~ ry Ln s z S/ T s ~ ,r t p ~ ~~1 D u PRp J'Y ?a'4 St ~ '~ 1 ~ J e +r a - ~ ~} c; FrsrAdin Re. fra±kln Rd. Franki+n Rd y 1 - ' - G. y -- • Area of Influence for a proposed single family development east of Black Cat Rd and south of Pine St located in TAZ 999. location shown in Figure 1 Fig;;re 1 ~ ~ 7 S ce.,ry L~. Charryr In.. - _ . ~t[~ xr a:i.~ gat tG+ y, ~ Y:c 1TJ 4Rf1 -rte, --- 436 S[3 ;,23 '~ 4 b C P u t3 ~ ~~ V ~ ~: Y yp~ Q s4O i ~[. ~,. u ~. a -- .. ... 113 13i !'lees Pine Jl veu3~' • ~ I (+~ 8t vera OJ4 H `.~. frantGn Rd naeteeRa. `..Bt az r-4u, F.3~ trsn .pk, a. ~- =µ'' -t, roz era t The following table documents the existing demographics for TAZ 999 as welt as the demographics used for the special model run. Demographics for TAZ 999 2010 2016 Forecast 2016 Forecast + Proposal Househo I ds 23 52 _266 (52 + 214) __ _ __ Jobs 13 13 13 n N N (D _~ N~ Q