St. Luke's Meridian Medical Center CZC 00-036
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
MAYOR A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT
Robert D. Cowie (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501
CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Ron Anderson 33 EAST IDAHO BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Keith Bird
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 887-221 I • Fax 887-1297
Tammy deWeerd (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 PLANNING AND ZONING
Cherie McCandless City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533 • Fax 888-6854
CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIAN CE*
Date: May 30, 2000
Owner: Applicant: St. Lukes Meridian Medical Center
Contact: Jav Gibbons South Landscape Architects
Address: Eagle Road, north of I-84
Proposed Use:_ St. Luke's Meridian Medical Center Phase III C~~ ' ~D'' 0~
Zoning: L-O
COMMENTS:
Development Agreement (DA) & Conditional Use Permit (CUPZ Project is subject to all conditions
of the DA (Instrument No. 100021863; March 21, 2000) and the CUP (approved November
4, 1999). The City's failure to specifically identify all requirements of the DA and/or CUP
in this Certificate of Zoning Compliance does not relieve the owner of responsibility for
compliance.
Sig_na~e: All signage is subject to design review and requires separate permits. No signage is
permitted in ACHD right-of--way. No portable signs or temporary signage permitted (such
as A-Frames).
Parkin : Standard and handica _ ccessible parking requirements are met by the plan per
memorandum dated 0 from South Landscape Architects/Olson Associates.
Dimensions of all parking areas shall conform to minimum dimensions as per city ordinance
and ADA. Handicap parking spaces must have signage per ADA standards.
Handicap-Accessibility: By stamping the building plans, the project architect and landscape
architect certify that the site is in compliance with federal handicap-accessibility
requirements.
Landscaping: The site/landscape plan has been determined to be in compliance with zoning
requirements, with the following comments: My revisions to the submitted table, titled `Tree
Planting Requirements', show a total caliper inch requirement for phases 1-3 of 1714 cal-in.
The total provided is 1709 (5 cal-in. short of the requirement). However the "110% Rule"
for 2" cal. trees was not in effect at the time Phases 1 and 2 were constructed. Therefore, the
submitted landscape plan is deemed adequate, but future phases will have to meet landscape
requirements on their own, without reliance on any landscaping provided in phases 1-3. All
trees, shrubs, and lawn azeas must be planted as per the approved landscape plan (Sheets L-
1.1, L-1.2, L1.3, and L3.0, dated 4/14/00). Written approval of any changes is required; no
field changes permitted.
Irri ag tion: An underground, pressurized irrigation system must be installed to all landscaped areas.
Li tin :Lighting shall not cause glare or impact the traveling public or neighboring development.
Undevelope~roperty: Any undeveloped portion of St. Luke's property must be kept mowed and
free from weeds over 8" in height until such time it is built out. No pazking, storage or other
use is permitted on the undeveloped portion of the property.
Certificate of Occupancy: The parking shown on the approved plan as "Potential 5`h/6`h Floor
Parking Expansion" must be provided prior to obtaining occupancy for those portions of the
building. See Findings of Fact 19.22 and Conclusions of Law 2.22.
Plan Modifications: The Site Plan and Landscape Plan are not to be altered without prior
written approval of the Planning & Zoning Department. No field changes to the site
or landscape plans are permitted; prior written approval of alt changes is required.
The Site Plan and Landscape Plans dated 4/14/2000 are approved with the comments noted above.
ari Stiles
Planning & Zoning Administrator
*Receipt of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance does not indicate compliance with requirements of other
departments/agencies, including, but not limited to, Ada County Highway District, Central District Health
Department, affected irrigation district(s), Meridian Sewer, Water, Building or Fire Departments, etc. This
certificate shall expire one (1) year from the date of issuance if work has not begun.
W
m
m
m
m
z
y
E
V
t
>'
E
~t
N
~-1.
~ x
D x
D x
D
~ rn m rn i rTi'
r = ~ ~ Z fT1
~
m p m
r
'~ p O ~
v ° ~ ~ _'
r
Z I
~ ~
_ n^
Y L
m
'
~ ~ ~
I a
Oo
N
v w
~ j
W ~
I N
N
r ~
N
,o
~'
w ~ o
~
~.
m ~ m
'
;'
mp
N ~
m ~,
~O
., a ~
N
~+ J
N J I
t~0 ~ O
I „ T
!~/
.
Iw ~~ m
~ p ~
_ ~~
~m
w m~ ~
`~
~
j I
~
~ ~ A
~m ~
-
~
.~ N -~ = o
~~ W
~
Z~
Dy
m
,
N
N m m ~
v +
W~p,~
m'`' m
W W OD N y N
V to -~
O ~
a
a
x y
~
~• IN ~
V
~ W~,1
~
~
tC (
fl N I
v.
- ~ '~;
„.
+'.
:,h: rv ~t
~.*" 'r
1
,: .
.~
..
.,~,
.~
~.
it!
s
:~ .
,,.
Sent By: OLSON ASSOCIATES
~, o ~`~,
~ r `. ~
~n pmp
t 0 7
i ~
W
d
.~
v.
0
to
0
0
ii
r
00
ARCHITECTS; 1208 466 2212; Jun-5-04.14:12; Page 2/2
.~
"' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rn ~ ~ ~ ~
I- ~ Cl (
p
} ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 44
m ~ ~ ~ ~
O ~ ~ ~ O
v ~ ~ r
._
a
Z $
y N
~ r
~ ~
K~ ~ ~ ,~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~
~~p
~~
A
N N
G
~
O ~
O ~
~ g~
$ -
~ m
~ m
~ ~
r
~ ~
~ m ~
~ ~
~
$ s
V a~-
T
(N N c A 0~ + e ~ r
~ -
~ ~
~
~1 ~ ~ p1 N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 01 •
~ •
N «
O
m m ~ +
H N ~ ~
11
~i0 O ~
N ~ ~ W ~
ro
m
a
r
A
~ a
~iA~ tp ~ Oe ~p
a
r
O ~ N ~ W ~ ~
Sent By: OLSON ASSOCIATES ARCHI~TS; 1208 466 2212; Jun-~ 13:19;
~ ~ ~ ~ ti
~, ~
s
w
~~
L
W ~ ~ ~ ~ M
yF~
F ~
O P ~ N N ~
• `V
~ _
p
~ w ~ ~ ~
•
~ ~g ~ ~~ $ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~8 $ ap
• r-
,-
•
~
~r. "8
°~ ~
&.- ~~
~~o ~
a ~~~~
~p~~
.-..
.~
~~~ R ~
~~
~i7 S! ~ ~Y~ ~ ~3~~ ~ ~! ~
g ~ ~ y
Z
a
~ ~
~ o
W
~~ ~ C
W ~~~ ~ p
C ~
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I
~
~~
~
~
Y
~~
~
G ~ ~
~
~
~
p
F N
~ ~ ~
d
Page 2/2
i
w
a
.~
&g
r .n
o e
~ ~
o
0 `~ o
d' :- ~
M .N. c
-~ O
w
a
~ 3
x
'' Q1 w ~
'a a~ o>
~
tG
z
W ~ ~yy
a f J
JWW ~.
~
O~y
- f' F
~ N N ,~ N N ~ O
O
~~
z
W N
~ YW
JK R'
=a~
N rc
$ ~ 0
m 0
m
W LL cc ~ri ~ V
I3 N
~ _
N
Z ~ V 0 07 O V N W W ~ ~ ~ ~ fO N ~
~c ~ M M O
~a
a_ ~
~ w0 r
~ ~ N
'
b
UF ~+'7
M ~7
M
~ N~7
W N
~
~ ^O^
n i~
n
~ g8
O 8
r` o
W o
W
.
7LL~(LLJ~
~O th O N N r f`7 N N ~ Oi CD
~ pm m
y
fh
fNq ~2
W N
~a?~
W
K
F
F- N V
m' s
f 1"' Of 0 0
5 ~ 1n 7 0 t
A m
^ N N N
QQ
M
~ pp
M po
f~
~
N a
a
O nn
N
N
V
~ p
p
~ l
~
~
M (N
~
M (
N~
M
~ !' N
~" N
C7
~_
Z
W Z
~i J Q
~ ~ ~
J
W
~
~
m
~
~
~ _
~
~
~
di
~
~
~
J
~
~
~
~
~
~
F-
w ~
/
ii
W
>
~
"
~
Q~
}j
~
~
0 ~
-'
a
~
~'
~
J
~
~'
y
U
W C
@
G
Q ~
c LL
~' (
@
(!J
~ ~
c S O
W 2j
~
JI ~p
i I L- _ ~
~ ~
~ (n
~
~ LL
~
~ VJ
~ =
~ ~ J
Q
W o 0 0 o d y ~ g ~ ~ ~ W
v) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -- W
~ H
qq~~
a
~ q?~~
a y
~ ~
d ~
~ `~ ~ ~ a q~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ a p
~ a a a a ~ a a a a a b` a d ~
~g
o~
~ ~
,,,, ~,~.
. •~•
:,.a~,
•
~da ountc~ ic~hwu~
Sherry R. Huber, President
Judy Peavey-Derr, Vice President Garden ~
Marlys Meyer Routson, Secretary F
Dave Bivens, Commissioner ,
Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner a-mail: tellu
September 8, 1999
TO: Jeff Hull
St. Luke's Regional Medical Center
190 E Bannock
Boise, ID 83712
~ ,~
FROM: Steve Arnold, Principal Development Analyst~~-.~~ !:, .
Ada County Highway District
~f./~.~
UBJECT: MCU99-23 - Ea le n/o I-84 ~E
S g ~~.
Expansion of St. Luke's
Your application for the above referenced project was acted on by the Commissioners of the Ada
County Highway District on August 11, 1999. The attached staff report lists conditions of approval and
street improvement s which are required.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 387-6170.
cc: Plan&Dev Svsc-Chron/File
John Edney
Chuck Rinaldi
Jim Jones & Associates
South Lanscape Architecture
City Of Meridian
Steve Siddoway
•
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
Planning and Development Division
Development Application Report
MCUP99-23
Eagle Road n/o I-84 Expansio-~ of St. Luke's
The applicant is requesting conditional use approval for phase three of the medical center. The
37.5-acre site is located at the northeast corner of I-84 and Eagle Road. The site I~as an existin`
140,000-square foot building (phase !)and 128,000-square foot building (phase ?) is cun•ently
under construction. The subject application is for phase three which is a 132,600-square foot
building. This development is estimated to generate 2,100 additional (3,100 existing) vehicle
trips per day based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation manual.
Roads impacted by this development: Eagle Road
ACHD Commission Date -August 11, 1999 - 7:00 p.m.
_ o-__.
SP N_G_YK.o_QD ~ ~~ ., w;
.____ _ft _
I ~ '~ ---- ...__ .. w
_-.•_
i
.__ ---~ Y - ...
~' .._
..._ _ .. ~y~ .....
---•--MA Gl_C .VIE-VK---- ...., O,o
~'~ ~ SITE -
~ r
u7' m
~ z -_ . .
_ _-_. ~
- -- - 7 O _ -- .-
- r r ___
-- --- Z
~ _.. _
2
r-
O N
~ __
m
Z~
J
a
~_
~..
W
Y
J
I-
LL
O
O
r
of
0
N j
.-
o~
0
~ ~
I
0
0
cc
-~
tiZ
---v~ O_!
W~. ~ j~,
/~ ~.\
=p~
WN
C~
~~~
of
o
c~
i
0
'a2~ 3lJ`d~
CJ
•
~w_. ~^.` .1.~y~ _ OHY01 'NYg1tl 3n 'OYOtl 319Y3 N1006 OZS o'~ 0 ~5 ~ i I I
',I w...,~ ~:,e:~ ;~.~;~^Y;:.~: ' ~~
el asvt~a Nd-ld 311S J`` ~ I I ~'~
i ~;:~s°il i
u YJ'P3~1Ff~+V ~R~V'~
~ -__
.~:
~ttt3a waa3~ mpg
B
3xf11 ~ ^~
~
om ,
f!f f i
`
9 (( ~
I`
.i vw:::.. . ~ n
. Z u 9',
t i~~ 6 t i I
ui~ w.i ~a~
R 1ru~ \~~
y3~ 3
0
o D?i 1
~~ ~
0
~ 5;7 a
~e~ ~
Y .xk
o` '! t
L e (~c G.
£ ~'[Q ;"
~C ~[
i i i~ a`
K ~ ~~ ~q
a a
k ~- ~ 4
rg :a r§ e9
r r r r~
a~ xt5 ~a! : ~
g LY 1' sY a~i
g ~iQ ~i~ siY ikiP1~
~~~1 g~s8 ~=E1 ~~~Is
~ % tl 3 !
$ ~ ~
11111111111~,I1`~T1I lillllil~lll,IIII
~ III'lllllllll I V~11111111
~I ~_ . , I ! I I ~I I
~i '11111 II '1
1
I
~i. IIII
y- 1 3- ~ I 111 I I
I --.
i •~h.y ,'~~ ~ J
Ji ...
is
~M
~} , ~
;1 1
~ YrJ~ON1 i I~nl O a1.f~
'~- , j .
M
~ _ ~-
` . 1 I I wr~.a+rTwvw .o w
~~ ~ I . , a
I,
I'
~, ~ I J ~ J ,
lfSr -, ~_~ + ~, ~ 1
~j
i~ __
I i..
f - ~~_`
1.
6
e R~~
?:: €
~' r
1
~~~
-!eg E
~ ;#~: ~
a ~ ~~ P3
yyiy t
~ ~e~e~ 34
t ~ y
u 6
i
~t ~ I i I j I ~~ o
~ , ~ f~~ ~~SII ' ~W
~~ ~~~f~ ~~~ ~~~~'~~~ 1 ~ N
!~ U
N
k 1! k k 1 k! r[ t 1 1 k !:
f
M? - I
~III~II~I II II~Rf ~lll ~I~I I~ !1
~. ^~~
I ~
Y M ~~ <
it
~~ ~ := ` .~
I
r
~1~, .
i •.
s
!" a. .y~
r , '• ~ '
' ~ +l I
i ~ ~ ~'
-. ..
__, ._.. ~AGI.~ tZoA~
o v o a a~~ v a
r ) ~ _,
--_ Q--~--
__.-~
l
~ G w
--
..J
~~
~
~~.
,
~--_
~AGL.C 1~jE.w --- ~
SITE
m
z
0
m
z
,,
•
Facts and Findings:
A. GeneralInforniatiorl
Owner - St. Luke's Regional Medical Center
Applicant -Same
L-0 -Existing zoning
37.5 -Acres
182,600 -Square feet of proposed building
140,000 -Square feet of existing building
128,000 - Currently under construction (phase fi)
283 -Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ)
West Ada -Impact Fee Benefit Zone
Western Cities -Impact Fee Assessment District
Fab] Road
Principal arterial
Traffic count 31,975 on 11-6-96
1,24- feet of frontage
138-feet existing right-of--way
Comply with ITD for required right-of--way
Eagle Road is improved ~~ith ~ traffic lanes with curb, gutter and sidewalk abtrttin~ this site.
The signalized intersection of the main driveway to St. Luke's complex and Eagle Road is
located at the site's north property line. y
B. Utility street cuts in new pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in
writing by the District. Contact Constnrction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for
details.
C. The Destination 2015 Regional Transportation Plan identified Eagle Road as a limited access
facility. Under this designation, access to Eagle Road would be regulated by a limited number
of traffic signals (with adequate spacing between successive signals), turn channelization and
restrictions at trnsignalized intersections and raised medians between channelized turns. Grade-
separated interchanges should be anticipated at arterial/arterial intersections.
D. Montvue Subdivision abuts the site's northern property line. The property owners~of Montvue
Subdivision have requested the District to provide their subdivision access to tl~e signalized
intersection at St. Luke's northern property line. The development to the north originally
opposed a public street adjacent to the southern boundary of their subdivision when the first
phase of the St. Luke's property was befo-•e the Commission. The District originally
recommended a public street along the St. Luke's northern boundary and eventually dropped the
requirement due to neighborhood concerns. The site has been developed according to previous
Commission action that did not require a public roadway along tl~e northern property line.
`1CUP992 3.C~i~l
Pa~_e 2
• s
Since that time the traffic on Earle Road has increased significantly, thus making left turns
into/out of the Montvue Subdivision very difficult. Staff is anticipating that the traffic on Eagle
Road will increase up to 20% per year. Montvue Drive is the only public street access that
Montvue Subdivision has to the public roadways. The applicant has concerns about granting
cross access to the subdivision to the north. The property to the east is proposed as an adult
living center and the subject applicant has ne;otiated with that parcel to the east for a reciprocal
cross access agreement, located along the site's north property line, that will be utilized by St.
Luke's for access to Frankli~l Road aid tl~e parcel to tl~e east will utilize it for access to Eagle
Road. The public transportation system would greatly benefit from cross access agreements
between the subject site and the parcels to the north and east. Staff encourages the subject
applicant to work with the District to determine a location for a cross access agreement from
the subject site's north property to the Montvue Subdivision, which will provide residents in the
subdivision access to Eagle Road via the signalized intersection at tl~e site's north property line.
E. State Hishway-55 and Interstate-S4 are under the jurisdiction of Idaho Transportation De-
partment (ITD). Application materials should be submitted to ITD for review and requirements
of that Department and the applicant should submit to the District a letter from ITD regarding
said requirements prior to District approval of the final plat or issuance of a building permit (or
other required pernits), whichever occurs first. The applicant may contact District III Traffic
Engineer Walter Burnside at 334-5340.
F. The site's two existing driveways on Eagle Road, one alined with Magic View Drive on the
west side of the road and the other adjacent to the northern boundary, were previously approved
with phase one of the St. Luke's development. Staff recommends that no other driveways be
permitted on Eagle Road.
G. There are currently approximately 31,975 vehicle trips per day on Eagle Road, and traffic on
Eagle Road is anticipated to increase significantly over the next few• years. This development
and the potential for redevelopment in the area will exacerbate the existing traffic problems on
Eagle Road. The new traffic from this development and other approved developments in the
vicinity will add 11,510 vehicle trips per day, bringing the total to approximately 43,45
vehicle trips per day, which will exceed the pl«nning tlr~•eshold Level of Service (LOS) E
volume of a ttipical five-lane roadway. According to the July 31, 1997 "Ada County Road~vc~ti~
Capacity Gcridelines for Plan ring Applications", 40,000 AADT is the middle of the range of
LOS E for a typical five-lane roadway (Urban/Suburban Arterial -Non-Business District), with
42,500 being the upper limit of that range. This section of Eagle Road between I-54 and
Franklin Road is not a typical five-lane roadway. It has a degree of access control and glow-to-
moderate volume of turning conflicts between signalized intersections. T11is section of
roadway should have the capacity to accommodate all of the traffic from the currently proposed
developments. The planning threshold has not been detern~ined for this type of roadway. Staff
recommends that the APA Transportation Nlodel Advisory Committee (TMAC) be requested to
evaluate Eagle Road from I-84 to S.H. 44 and establish planning thresholds For it.
H. The Eagle Road Cor,•idor Study states that access control on Eagle Road can increase the .,
capacity of the roadway by as much as fifty-percent which is the same increase in capacity that
can be experienced by the construction of two additional lanes. Access control will increase the
planning threshold (LOS E) to higher levels, perhaps as much as »,000 ADT. The
MCUP99'_:.C~I~1
Paue 3
construction of frontage roads, grade-separated interchanges and tl~e elimination of signalized
intersections recommended by the Study will further increase the LOS E planning threshold to
80,000 ADT because of the rota! elimination ofside-friction from intersections.
The study suggests the following methods of access control:
Marginal Access Control Concepts:
a. driveway spacing between successive driveways
b. driveway spacing from an intersection
c. driveway design
2. Medial Access Control Concepts:
a. median type
b. median width
c. the geometries of median openings, and
d. spacing of median openings
Major intersection Control Concepts
a. at-grade intersection modifications
b. grade-separated intersections
4. Frontage Roads: frontage roads were proposed as an option to provide full access to
abutting parcels along Eagle Road when access restrictions were imposed.
The access control measures were to be implemented in phases as adequate Levels of Service
on Eagle Road were exceeded. The study recommended five different phases of access control
beginning with the existing access conditions to a future restricted-access expressway with
grade-separated intersections. The first level of access control would allow full access
driveways at 660-foot intervals; the second level of access control would eliminate the left turns
at those driveways through the installation of raised medians. The first level of access control
on Eagle Road between I-84 and Franklin Road has been implemented. Traffic is now
anticipated to exceed LOS E for typical five-lane roadways under the level one access control.
Right-of--way preservation for frontage roads and roadway improvements should be
implemented to allow Eagle Road to maintain its function and to carry tl~e exceptional volume
of traffic that is expected. In order to accommodate the traffic generated from this site and
future development along Eagle Road, staff recommends ti~at a median be constructed in Earle
Road from the Eagle Road/I-84 interchange to Franklin Road as the second level of access v
control. The median should be constructed to eliminate left toms at the eighth-mile driveways
and street approaches. In future phases of corridor protection, a fi•onta~e road on both tl~e east
and west side of Eagle Road should be constructed from Franklin Road south to the signalized
intersection at St. Luke's driveway to provide tliose parcels affected by tl~e median access to full
access intersections to Eagle Road. In even later stages of protection, the urban interchange at
the intersection of Eagle Road and Franklin Road should be constructed.
Paee -4
• •
Special Recommendation to ITD and the Cite of lvleridian:
Other than the t~vo existing driveways on Eagle Road, direct lot or parcel access to Eagle Road
should be prohibited.
This development a~ld the potential for redevelopment in the area, will exacerbate tl~e existing
traffic problems on Eagle Road. The District recommends that a median be constructed in
Eagle Road from the Eagle Road/i-S4 interchange to Franklin Road as suggested in the second
level of access control recommended in the Eagle Road Access Control Study. The median
should be constructed to eliminate left turns at driveway and street approaches at every location
except the St. Luke's signalized driveway. In later stages of protection, frontage road on both
tl~e east and west side of Eagle Road should be constructed from Franklin Road south to tl~e
signalized intersection at St. Luke's driveway to provide access to full access intersections for
the parcels affected by tl~e median.
Special Request of the Applicant:
Staff encourages the subject applicant to work with the District to determine a location for a
cross access from the subject site's north property to the IViontvue Subdivision, which will
provide residents in the subdivision access to Eagle Road via the signalized intersection at the
site's north property line.
The following requirements are provided as conditions for approval:
Site Specific Requirements:
Comply with requirements of ITD for State Highway-~5 and Interstate-84 frontage. Submit to
the District a letter from ITD regarding said requirements prior to District approval of the final
plat or issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first.
Contact District III Traffic Engineer Walter Burnside at 334-8340.
As required by District policy, restrictions on tl~e width, number and locations of driveways,
s11a11 be placed on future development of this parcel.
Standard Requirements:
A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein
shall be made in writing to the ACRD Planning and Development Supervisor. There nest
shall specifically identify each requirement to he reconsidered and include a written explanation
4f why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardshi.Ror ine pity. The written
request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:~~ a.m. on the day scheduled for
AC'HD Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the
Commission on the next available meeting agenda.
Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on tl~e day scheduled for Commission action
do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from t11e consent agenda and
N(CUP992 ~.C'~l~t
Pase ~
report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those
items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission.
After ACRD Commission action, anv request for reconsideration ofthe Commission's action
shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the
action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The reni~PSt for reconsid~rltion shall
~necifically identify each req_iiirement to he reconsidered and include written documentltloll of
data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its origin•il d ision. The request
for reconsideration will be heard by tl~e District Commission at the next regular meeting of the
Commission. If tl~e Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified
of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard.
Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in
accordance with Ordinance #188, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact
Fee Ordinance.
4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District
Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services
procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An
engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit
(or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes.
6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of--way.
Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to
ACRD . The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-185) at least two full
business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of--way. The applicant shall contact
ACRD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACRD conduits (spare or filled) are
compromised during any phase of construction.
No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing
and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized
representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to
obtain written confirmation of any change From the Ada County Highway District:
9. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans,
or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in
interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject
property unless awaiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant
to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought.
`iCUP9923.C~1~1
Pa~_e G
Conclusion of Law:
ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity
impacted by the proposed development.
Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development
Division at 387-6170.
August 11 1999 __
MCUP992~.C~IM
Pace 7
06/01/2000 12:29 208-387-6393 ACHD PLANNING PAGE 01
GL OGL12~1~ GGj. 2f.UGL~ C~ ~/^CC~
Judy Peavey-Derr, President 318 East 37th Street
Dave Bivens, Vice President Garden City, Idaho 83714-6499
Marlyss Meyer, Secretary Phone (208) 387-6100
Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Fax (208) 387-6391
Susan S. Eastlake. Commissioner E-mail: tellus@achd.ada.id,us
PLANNING and DEVELOPMENT
DATE: ~ ~`~
DELIVER FAX 70;
NAME OF COMPANY:
TITLE/DEPARTMENT:
RECEIVING FAX NUMBER:_ ~~7 Ia~7
CONFIDENTIAL: YES NO
NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover sheet)
FRAM ADA COUNTY HIGHV11gY QISTRICT (fax # 387-6391 or (fax # 387-63931
NAME: ~--~"-~1 ~ ~' ~~~%
TITLE/DEPARTMENT:
.s~P.~
COMMENTS: ;~~r~ l5 Gi C.o,,~y ~ ~~~ ~~
~.
~~ C~r'l~l~ z,. ~ ~~ ~2 Sin ~-
Please ca11 if you have any questions or if you did not receive all pages of this fax.
You may call us at 387-6170
r
JUN 01 '00 13 34 208 387 6393 PAGE.01
06/01/2000 12:29
208-387-6393
ACHD PLANNING
PAGE 02
~G>LGi. ~OLCi2~ •/QL~C`2LUGL •
~ .l ~ ~l ~ ~Y'LC~
Judy Peavey-Derr, President 318 East 37th Street
Dave Givens, Vice President Garden City, Idaho 83714-6499
Marlyss Meyer, Secretary Phone (208) 387-8100
Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Fax (208) 387-6391
Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner a-mail: tellus achd.ada.id.us
June 1, 2000
South Landscape Architecture
Attn: Jay Gibbons
915 W. Jefferson
Boise, Idaho 83702
RE: iV1CUP-99-0023/Eag1e Rd & ~-84 /St. Lu1ce's Expansion Phase 3
PLANS AC'(`R.PTANCE
The District has reviewed the plans for the above referenced project, and they are accepted for public street
construction. By stamping and signing the improvement plans, the Registered Engineer ensures the District
that the plans conform to all District policies and standards. Variances or waivers must be specifically and
previously approved by the District in writing. Acceptance of the improvement plans by the District does not
relieve the Registered Engineer of these responsibilities. The District will assess the following impact fee for
this project. The impact fee must be paid prior to issuance of a building permit.
Total Impact);ee due: $343,141.00
Standard Requlrenaents:
z ~ Utility street cuts in new pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in
writing by the District.
2• All irrigation facilities must be located outside the public right-of--way unless otherwise
approved by the District.
3• Replace damaged curb, gutter, and sidewalk with new curb, gutter, and sidewalk to match
existing improvements.
3. fall facilities to be constructed with a proposed development, and to be owned and maintained by
the District; must be constructed according to the latest edition of LS.P.W.C. and the District's
Supplemental Standard Specifications.
>~ Any work in the public right-of--way requires a permit from ACRD Construction Services.
~• An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
1f you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at 387-6176.
Sincerely,
e e
Planning and Development
JUN 81 '88 13 34 208 387 6393 PAGE. 82
06/01/2000 12:29
y
208-387-6393
ACHD PLANNING
PAGE 03
~~ OGL~Z ~ C~ 2U/C>Ll~ Lit/^LC~
'"'"~ ' "'"ter-~°" ~ ~ ~ °~~u~~ ~~ 318 East 37th Street
Dave Bivens, Vice President Garden City, Idaho 83714-6499
Marlyss Meyer, Secretary Phone (208) 387-6100
Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Fax (208) 387-6391
Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner _ e-mail: tellusto)achd.ada.id.us
June 1, 2000
MCUp-99-0023
Eagle Road
,~t_ T.tlkea F~rnancinn Ah~ca ;
IMPACT FEl/ CALCULATION
Building Type Cost per Unit
(per 1,000 SF) Area (Sl~) Total Cost
Medical-Hospital $1,336.00 256,842 $343,141.00
Total Impact Fee Due
$343,I4I.00
JUN 01 '00 13:34 208 3B7 6393 PAGE. 03