Loading...
ACHD CommentsAda County Highway District John S. Franden, President 3775 N. Adams Street Dave E. Wynkoop 1st Vice President Garden City ID 83714-6499 Susan S. Eastlake, 2nd Vice President Phone (208) 387-6100 Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner FAX (2q8) 387-6391 Dave Bivens, Commissioner E-mail: tellus@AC D.ada.id.us TO: Ram International P.O. Box 99010 Lakwood, WA 98499 July 1, 2004 SUBJECT: MCZC04-050 Ram Restaurant including site improvements Eagle Road south of Presidential Drive g k i ~ .lr.... .~ J ~ _ ~ ~~ ZGa~t (~i},y ~~,~r~ ©ffice On August 23, 2000, the Ada County Highway District Commissioners acted on MPFP00-002 for Presidential Subdivision. The conditions and requirements also apply to MCZC04-050. If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact this office at (208) 387-6171. Sincerely, ~'`- `~2`~Yt--- Jo a Newton Development Analyst Right-of-Way & Development Services CC: Project File, Drainage/Utilities/Construction Services Lead Agency: City of Meridian Crossings LLC P.O. Box 15407 Boise, Idaho 83715 BRS Architects Roger Foster 1010 South Allante Place, Suite 100 Boise, Idaho 83709 ~...o ~. ..-,a.o tl RtiyOD• J ~r iRYI O^Yi7R nFl~~ YYr?N ddGfYl1 '~ db~y~ ~~NNy'1d-,L~~1.IH~~d ~' e ~ ~ d M ~I I ~~ MMt ~.rtu.Mp • • o J 0 i ~ y 7~ g~ ~ ~ •` y ~ ~' ~ ~ I r ~ i , ~ ~ i i i M :dt ~ I _ .wn n~cn.r• I Q ~ ~ ° _~ r ~ ~ .assn ~ ..[ y ar n 1 +ON MOAN~O/q air /'j j \~ I ~, i ' ;~ ~ ;~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ j=1 I '•I 1 ~ ~ I ~ d% / 1 • ~; .._..._.__..._..._. ------- ... I 1 _~*•F~__a~- ~ Dev opment Process hecklist ®Submit a development application to a City or to the County ®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACRD ®The ACHD Planning Review Division will receive the development application to review ®The Planning Review Division will do one of the following: ^Send a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific I requirements at this time. ^Send a "Comply With" letter to the applicant stating that if the development is within a platted subdivision or part of a previous development application and that the site specific requirements from the previous development also apply to this development application. ^Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. ^Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. ^The Planning Review Division will hold a Technical Review meeting for all Staff and Commission Level reports. ^For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" or "Comply With" letter: • The applicant should submit two (2) sets of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development Review Division for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements required by ACHD, then architectural plans maybe submitted for purposes of impact fee calculation.) • The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction'Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the right-of--way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts. ^Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval. DID YOUREMEMBER: Construction (Zone) ^ Driveway or Property Approach(s) • Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to Ada County Highway District (ACHD) Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval. ^ Working in the ACHD Right-of--Way • Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit Application" to ACHD Construction -Permits along with: a) Traffic Control Plan b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt. Construction (Subdivisions) ^ Sediment & Erosion Submittal • At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Con an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACHD Construction -Subdivision to be reviewed and approved by the ACHD Drainage Division. ^ Idaho Power Company • Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being scheduled. ^ Final Approval from Development Services • ACHD Construction -Subdivision must have received approval from Development Services prior to scheduling aPre-Con. • • Fi wre 1 ~ ~~} U Q. ~ s s g i j G a m m ~~, ~. .~ ~ . ~ ~~ m ~ 8. . ~. E °~ ~~8 a ~,m^a. W ~ a ~. m o U. a~~m ~~m~ ~m~r ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~- ~~~ a n s s ~~ n a n ~~~ ~~ ~ ,~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ m ~~ ~ €s~ ~~ ~~ t~~tm ~ ~~ ~~ E~~~. m~~a ~ E¢= - E-~ ~ ~ c E ~ '".: ~ a~~° ~'~~~ m ~E <~ ~~ m ~ g ~ ~. W. p ~ ~ W ~ G _ ¢¢ ~ e°L1E~ ~9,t m, C gtl ~$ ~. go s~ 3 ~~ ~~ ~ m ~ m ~~ ~~~ o ~ E~~ ~ ~~C F ~ ~~ ~~`_~~ ~ ~~~ -E~~ ..................... 4 ~. ~ a~ ~ ~' 3~ ~c m E o v m c ~~ ~~,~ ~$ A ~ m~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~. ~ ~. ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ z ~~~ a ~~ m ~o ~~ ~m ~ ~~~ `~E ~ ~~ . ~~~ ~~~ ~.~ ~ ~_®~~ C;~ _ £~ s ~ Aso n a ! _@ °° W ~iIi $~ ~~.v1 ~~~' Wpm ~~m; ~~ ~ a > i m ~~m~m m l~~a ~~.~t S° ~j ~' ~~~ .wP'~';~~. ~ ~ - Ada County Highway District Right-of--Way & Development Department Planning Review Division Thrs appl~cat~on does not require Commission action and is approved at the staff level as of June 10, 2003. Tech Review for this item was held with the applicant via phone%-mail on June 2nd and 3rd, 2003. Please refer to Attachment 3 for appeal guidelines. I Staff,contact: Craig Hood, 387-6174, chood(c~achd.ada.id.us i File Numbers: MPP03-013/MCZC03-036, Lynwood Plaza Subdivision Site Address: Cherry Lane, east of Ten Mile Road Owner: Oakwood Enterprises, LLC 114 E. Idaho Avenue, #230 Meridian, ID 83642 Applicant: Centennial Development, LLC 114 E. Idaho Avenue, #230 Meridian, ID 83642 Representative: Shawn L. Nickel C/O Land Consultants, Inc. 52 N. 2"d Street Eagle, ID 83616 Application Information The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval from the City of Meridian to subdivide 2.69-acres of L-O zoned property into 5 commercial lots. The site is located on the north side of Cherry Lane, approximately 1,300-feet east of Ten Mile Road in Meridian. Acreage: 2.69-acres Current zoning: L-O Proposed buildable lots: 5 Vicinit • A. Findings of Fact 1. Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 258 additional vehicle trips per day (0 existing) based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. 2. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any building permit(s) on the site. The fee will be based on the impact'fee ordinance in effect at the time the District receives a development application, or building permit submittal. 3. Traffic Impact Study: A traffic impact study was not required with this application 4. Site Information: The site is currently vacant. 5. Description of Adjacent/Surrounding Area: a. North: Single-family homes b. South: Single-family homes c. East: Single-family homes d. West: Single-family homes 6. Impacted Roadway: Cherry Lane: Frontage: Functional Street Classification: Traffic count: Level of Service: Speed limit: Nearest intersection: 415-feet Principal Arterial 11,386 east of Ten Mile Road on 4-22-02 14,352 west of Linder Road on 4-22-02 LOS "C" or better 35 MPH Haven Cove Avenue; an uncontrolled intersection 7. Roadway Improvements Adjacent To and Near the Site Cherry Lane is currently improved with 5 lanes (2 eastbound, 2 westbound and a center turn lane), curb, gutter and sidewalk abutting the site. 8. Existing Right-of-Way There is currently 96-feet of right-of-way (45-feet from centerline) for Cherry Lane abutting the site. 9. Existing Access to the Site '- There is currently a 50-foot wide curb return on the site. This curb return is located approximately 130-feet east of the west property line and in alignment with Haven Cove Avenue on the south side of Cherry Lane. 10. Site History ACHD Planning and Development Review staff has not reviewed this site in the recent past. 11. Five Year Work Program/Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Ten Mile Road, from Cherry Lane to Ustick Road, is currently in the District's Five Year Work Program for roadway improvements in 2008 (also in CIP). Linder Road, from Cherry Lane to Ustick Road, is currently in Preliminary Development (PD) as part of the District's Five Year Work Program (also in CIP). This section of Cherry Lane is not currently in the District's Five Year Work Program or CIP. 2 ,~ B. Findings for Consideration Right-of-Way ~ Sidewalk District policy requires 96-feet of right-of-way on arterial roadways (Figure 72-F1 B). This right-of-way allows for the construction of a 5-lane roadway with curb, gutter, 5-foot wide concrete detached sidewalks and bike lanes. If a proposed development abuts a collector or arterial street, the developer shall provide a sidewalk along the paved frontage and dedicate the right-of-way required by the proposed land use and scale of the project. The developer may construct additional improvements as provided in Section 7300 (District policy 7203.4.3). Cherry Lane is currently improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk within 96-feet of right-of-way. Therefore, the applicant should not be required to dedicate any additional right-of-way or construct any roadway improvements (curb, gutter or sidewalk) abutting the site unless it is damaged (see Standard Conditions of Approval #3 below) or reconstructed (see Access Points below). 2. Access Points Direct access to arterials and collectors is normally restricted (District policy 7207.8). District policy 72-F5, requires driveways located on collector or arterial roadways with a speed limit of 35 MPH to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet (measured centerline to centerline) from any existing or proposed driveway (or street). District policy 7207.9.3 restricts industrial/commercial driveways with daily traffic volumes over 1,000 vehicles to a minimum width of 24-feet and a maximum width of 40-feet. Curb return type driveways with 15-foot radii will be required for industrial/commercial driveways accessing collector and arterial roadways. Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. District policy 7207.9.1 requires driveways to be paved to their full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway including pavement tapers with 15-foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. The existing access point aligns with Haven Cove Avenue Street on the south side of Cherry Lane (measured centerline to centerline). The applicant is proposing to slightly modify the existing curb return on Cherry Lane, and then utilize it for all of the lots within the subdivision. Lots 1-5, Block 1, should utilize the existing location of the access point onfo Cherry Lane. The applicant should provide a copy of a recorded cross access easement to the District that allows all of the lots within the subdivision to use one driveway for access to the public streets. In accordance with District policy 7207.9.1, the applicant should also be required to pave the driveway to its full width and at least 30- feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway. If the curb return access point is altered, it should align (centerline to centerline) with Haven Cove Avenue and new curbing shall be installed with 15-foot radii to match into the existing improvements on Cherry Lane. Other than the access point specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Cherry Lane is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. 3 C. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. Reconstruct the existing curb return access point on Cherry Lane located approximately 125- feet east of the west property line and in alignment with Haven Cove Avenue on the south side of Cherry Lane (measured centerline to centerline). Lots 1-5, Block 1, shall share said access point for access to Cherry Lane, as proposed. Provide a copy of a recorded cross access easement to the District that allows all of the lots within the subdivision to use the access point for access to the public streets. 2. Other than the access point specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Cherry Lane is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. 3. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. D. Standard Conditions of Approval Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way. 2. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 3. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 4. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. 5. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACRD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 6. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 7. .Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 8. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #197, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387- 6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 4 10. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 11. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the properly which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. E. Conclusions of Law 1. The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are satisfied. 2. ACRD requirements are intended to .assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Attachments 1. Vicinity Map 2. Preliminary Plat 3. Appeal Guidelines 5 • Request for Appeal of Staff Decision 1. Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual. ~ a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs. b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission, shall not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection. c. Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply, and any modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal. d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing. e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at the hearing. Appeal Guidelines 6 . w,R~ t~ A ~s ~wl~~ a s~rr ~ ~avr ~ .. MVI+~p `tom„ rdOMJI ~ A~~'1 ~ o~r~r~ t~H ~f a~3 ~ ~~ e ~ ~~t ~~ ~ . ~ ~ . , I . ~.-- , _____, fi ~ ; ~i ~~ , ~. ~ ; Y ~~~ , _ _1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 ~ I 0 ~~ - r .. D ~ ~ ~i I D ~ i ~ • ~ 'I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ - .u ~s~- ~ ~~ , i ~~ - ; .•. i =~. ~ ~' p '~ o i o 3 ;-f ' i ~ ~ ~ a ~ I ~~ ®~ ~I ~ ! • 1~ r t x. _..__. .r :~ a ~. ~.s .. f ) -~ ~, S~ ,,L_ ~ `_ ~ t I ` f l . fi mac., - ~ . T b. ~. ~ ~< u •c ~ ; ~ y '; ~ ; ~~_ ~ ..~ - ~ ~_E is y ~ ~b.J~"4. ~.L S r _ ~-.~x ~. ; ~; ~' ... J tom. ., . ! ~ ~ j S._' _ ~ '~~.,"~ y I s,F xr~ ~ _ ...,y .i ~, s - . '~ i L t ~ - " ~ ~,~ a \ -"'u+ent~e~.~w_ ..•. -' _•- ~ ~ : ~• .f ~ a F / 1 ~ E 3 ~ 9 _. r ~ I i ~/ 3 .I t~ r ' r ~ ~_ ..mss ' •, .-^~, i ~` ~ `~ ~ ~i 4'~ ~ ~i/ ~ 1 4 IM - I ~ ._ ~ y Tr7rr.-. ~'Ryi a -~ ~ i 'I -. 1 F r I= 7 ~ '6~ -r ~s f ~~~- f x ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~~ t } { s ~ 4 I . t- t ~~~ E i/ ~ 1 - F . -; t ri ~;~ ~. ~~ ~= - ` S ~J ~. I • .~ '~ 4 ~ ~ ~ r 4 le i '+'o .c I `. ~~.. ~ 4' '~'- is i ti%z t `~. sic ! ~ -- ~\ 9r i. ~ Q M1 µ i ! s - F 7 h ~~ "~T'~.-E _ j ~~ _ 1 f ? c .~.+ ~.1 ~=~ ~' _ ~ - 1 f - t , 'EM' - '- ~ 'w.«e,~•ti,~ i , ~ ~ ' ~• ~~^' -'-~~. t-_-..,__y_~ F 3 # ~.~„~ i ~ ~ ~ - 'tea` ~ i ~ n r l _' i ' ~"~:' ,\~' ~i-- qtT' ~ .. ~ la. t ~^ p" s,.. i _ t_~ ~' • ~y, 'fit / ~ _ ,` ~t _.. ._.._ ~ . t - y ^~' J t . ... /~ f ,k . c"sL ~ 1.. 1 j _i-i ~ ;~ ~/ ' . .. ` y ~ / 4 ' C e j~,~~ -y~.(r~ t1 It ~~ ~•S~r,~~ ~tt .,~ ~ `'i,~~~F~`y" ~s. ~i "'~~/ FC.E `L ~z' y ,,. ' '- i' 1 }_~~ ~ _ ~ / f t /~ f ~ f , ~; b '.. er~.: cs ~~^,, L•b ~~,5 / icy i ~i `, f I ~~ a-~1 k ~f A ~ ~ _~. iSi ~ 1 w °~' a ~ • ~ ors v. . ~. ~+- ~° ~ ~ ~" , v'~;k.~ f n +S t 1! r ~~77'~ ~ J'" ~ i,,, .r - c a 't. ~y y '.1~y r A~ ,:C..! r y f { ' ~: i '- ~, ~` ~~ X I :~.1 i s i' ~ ~ _~~ 4 *~f-f, + i ',rte t ~-~ ~,Y t•'T' __$ .';,ire .~ /yam Ada County Highway District John S. Franden, President David E. Wynkoop, 1st Vice President 3775 N Adams Street Susan S. Eastlake, 2nd Vice President Garden City ID 83714-6499 Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Phone (208) 387-6100 David Bivens, Commissioner FAX (208) 387-6391 E-mail: tellus@ACHD.ada.id.us Ram International P.O. Box 99010 Lakewood, WA 98499 Subject: Address: Project: Dear Applicant, MCZC04-050 Eagle Road, south of Presidential Drive Ram Restaurant and site improvements ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ City of Meridian City Clerk Office I must apologize for the mix up on your application. I simply attached the wrong staff report to your letter. I have attached the correct staff report. Please discard the previous mailing. This error will not hold up your project, because the error has been corrected before plans were submitted to the District. I have also submitted the correct report to the City of Meridian along with this explanation. Sincerely ` ~~ Jo a ~,swton Development Analyst Right-of-Way and Development Services CC: Project File, Construction Services, Drainage, Utilities Lead Agency: City of Meridian Crossings LLC P.O. Box 15407 Boise, Idaho 83715 BRS Architects Roger Foster 10140 South Allante Place, Suite 100 Boise, Idaho 83709 ~i CH John S. Franden, President Dave E. Wynkoop 1st Vice President Susan S. Eastlake, 2nd Vice President Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Dave Bivens. Commissioner 3775 N. Adams Street Garden City ID 83714-6499 Phone (208) 387-6100 FAX (20~) 387-6391 E-mail: tellus@AC, D.ada.id.us July 1, 2004 TO: Ram International P.O. Box 99010 ` Lakwood, WA 98499 SUBJECT: MCZC04-050 Ram Restaurant including site improvements Eagle Road south of Presidential Drive On August 23, 2000, .the Ada County Highway District Cpmmissioners acted on MPFP00-002 for Presidential Subdivision. The conditions and requirements also apply to MCZC04-050. If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact this office at (208) 38.7-6171. Sincerery, ~t~- Jo a Newton Development Analyst Right-of-Way & Development Services CC: Project File, Drainage/Utilities/Construction Services Lead Agency: City of Meridian Crossings LLC P.O. Box 15407 Boise, Idaho 83715 BRS Architects Roger Foster 1010 South Allante Place, Suite 100 Boise, Idaho 83709 Ada County Highway District ...,Q~ d 011A'`p~ 0 iWl~ 1OW gLL7R 1 - Ow~gsp YY~yN daIOIYJI b .-al~'o'1 ~~NNb1d-,L~~,LIH~~V .' 1-' ~' d _ 3~ i ..e ~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~3 ~ ~ ~ Z ~ 4 ~ i i ~ g~ ~ ~~ ~ i .Y ~ ~~ i i; E a s _=.i '- -----_ I ~ I ~ I r I i - I ~ I I I ... ~ ~ ~ ~ .v,. n.acat.r• 1 Q I I ~~ j ~. \, I ~ ~ ~, ~ ;~ ~ ! ~~ ,~ e~ ~ 1 ~~ ~~ I I ti~ jf~ I _ ~ "i' j f I~~l I 1 n o: ~~% err ------- ~ j ••~'~ as 1 9 ~ ~ ~• .wm ~.rty.NH ~ wrc ~..uw~ e+a.rp.,~~ - -- --- Devel6pment Process ('Recklist ®Submit a development application to a City or to the County ®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACRD ®The ACRD Planning Review Division will receive the development application to review ®The Planning Review Division will do one of the following: ^Send a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific / requirements at this time. i ^Send a "Comply With" letter to the applicant stating that if the development is within a platted subdivision or part of a previous development application and that the site specific requirements from the previous development also apply to this development application. - ^Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. ^Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. ^The Planning Review Division will hold a Technical Review meeting for all Staff and Commission Level reports. ^For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" or "Comply With" letter: The applicant should submit two (2) sets of engineered plans directly to ACRD for review by the Development Review Division for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements required by ACRD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee calculation.) The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACRD) for ANY work in the right-of--way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts. ^Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval. DID YOUREMEMBER: Construction (Zone) ^ Driveway or Property Approach(s) • Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to Ada County Highway District (ACRD) Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval. ^ Working in the ACRD Right-of--Way • Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit Application" to ACRD Construction -Permits along with: a) Traffic Control Plan b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt. Construction (Subdivisions) ^ Sediment & Erosion Submittal • At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Con an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACRD Construction -Subdivision to be reviewed and approved by the ACRD Drainage Division. ^ Idaho Power Company • Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being scheduled. ^ Final Approval from Development Services • ACRD Construction -Subdivision must have received approval from Development Services prior to scheduling aPre-Con. • ~r Figure 1 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT -. Planning and Development Division Development Application Report Preliminary Plat - Presidential/MPFP00-002 3-lot commercial subdivision An application has been submitted to the City of Meridian for approval of a preliminary/final plat. The application has been referred to ACRD by the City of Meridian for review and comment. The'] 0.99- ' acre site is located at the southeast comer of Presidential Drive and Eagle Road. This development is estimated to generate 4,000 additional vehicle trips per day based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation manual. This site and the associated trip generation was included in the original approval of the Meridian Family Center. None of the'site specific requirements have changed from the original report (MCUP-17-98). Roads impacted by this development: Eagle Road Presidential Drive ~ _ Pine Avenue Fairview Avenue ACRD Commission Date -August 23, 2000 - 7:00 p.m. Presidential Sub.cmm 1 . ~ ~ i Facts and Findings: A. General Information `, •_ - ------------------------------------------------------------ Deleted• 9 Owner -Developers Diversified Applicant -Tom Bauwens, Dakota Company I-L -Existing zoning 10.99 -Acres 3 -Proposed building ]ots 0 - Tota] lineal feet of proposed public streets 145 -Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) West Ada -Impact Fee Service Area Meridian -Impact Fee Assessment District Eagle Road (State Highway 55) -- Principal arterial Traffic count of 39,019 on 5-9-00 E-Existing Level of Service F-Existing plus project build-out Level of Service 750-feet of frontage 140-feet existing right-of--way Comply with ITD right-of--way requirements Eagle Road is improved with a 5'travel lanes and no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting this site. Eagle Road (SH-55) is under the jurisdiction of the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD). Presidential Drive Local/commercial street No current traffic count available 650-feet of frontage 69-feet existing right-of--way No additional rig~tt~f--way required The applicant previously made improvements to Presidential Drive by constructing the - westbound approach at the Eagle Road/Presidential Drive intersection to provide two westbound travel lanes, and one eastbound lane. Pine Avenue (not vet built) Collector with bike lane designation No traffic count available 660-feet of frontage 48-feet existing right-of--way No additional right-of--way required Pine Avenue between Eagle Road and Cloverdale Road is included in the Five Year Work Program. Presidential Sub.cmm 2 r w Fairview Avenue Principal arterial Traffic count of 25,6] 0 on 5-9-00 (e/o Eagle Road) Traffic count of 30,081 on 5-9-00 (w/o Eagle Road) C-Existing Level of Service F-Existing plus project build-out Level of Service 0-feet of frontage Fairview Avenue is improved with 5-travel lanes. There is sidewalk abutting the Family Center site. B. ,Cm September 23, 1998, the ACHD Commission reviewed MCUP-17-98, a conditional use ! application for an 848,000-square foot retail shopping center on 74.74-acres. The entire site, including this portion was estimated to generate 26,950 vehicle trips per day at full build-out. This site was included as part of the original application. This report reflects the requirements -- that pertain to this 10.99-acres of the overall site. The original staff report is included with this preliminary plat report, and includes the original traffic study conducted for the entire site. C. Eagle Road (State Highway 55) is under the jurisdiction of Idaho Transportation Department (ITD). Application materials should be submitted to ITD for review and requirements of that Department and the applicant should submit to the District a letter from ITD regarding said requirements prior to District approval of the final plat or issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. The applicant may contact District IlI Traffic Engineer Lance Johnson at 334-8340. ' D. Eagle Road traffic volumes have increased an average of 16% over the last seven years. Traffic has increased an average of 20% over the last four years. The APA model assumes a 4% annual growth rate until the Year 2015. While it is unlikely that the 20% growth rate will be maintained, the APA forecast is likely low, based on observed development rates and counts. E. The preceding analyses identified the following public street improvements needed to accommodate the additional traffic created by this project and the normal growth of background traffic (pertaining to this current site): A: Construct a traffic signal at the Eagle Road/Pine Avenue intersection. ~: "_ Construct dual southbound left turn lanes on Eagle Road at the Pine Avenue intersection. C. Construct dual westbound left tum lanes on Pine Avenue at the Eagle Road intersection. D. Construct Pine Avenue 28-feet wide from Eagle Road east to the eastern property line of this project. Two lanes are needed from the western driveway to the eastern property line. Four lanes are needed from the western driveway to the western property line. Presidential Sub.cmm 3 • • Depending upon the magnitude and direction of project development, staff determined that it was possible to implement the needed improvements in phases. The following table identifies the threshold level of development at which each improvement is needed. Some of these improvements have been constructed with previous development, and some are currently underway. THRESHOLD VALUES FOR SITE SPECIFIC .IMPROVEMENTS Needed Improvement Threshold Value'at Which Improvement is Required Dual left-turn lanes andright- X Needed after 450,000 GSF of buildings are constructed. turn lanes at (currently underway) Eagle/Fairview Signal at Records/Fairview X Needed at start of development north of Florence Street. (previously constructed) Dual left-tum lanes at X Needed at start of development north of Florence- Fairview/Records (on Street. Records) X Developer required to dedicate 6-feet ofright-of--way within 500-feet of Records intersection for future addition of dual left-tum lanes on Fairview by ACHD or others. (previously constructed) Signal at Eagle/Pine X Needed at. start of development south of Presidential Drive. (required with this development) Dual left-tum lanes on Eagle at X Needed at start of development south of Presidential Eagle/Pine Drive. (required with this development) Dual left-turn lanes on Pine at X Needed at start of development south of Presidential Eagle/Pine Drive. (required with this development) Construct Pine east of Eagle X Needed at start of development south of Presidential Drive. (required with this development) Construct deceleration lanes at ~ X Needed at start of development. (previously the Eagle Road accesses constructed) Construct third eastbound lane X Needed after 450,000 GSF of buildings are constructed. on Fairview west and east of (currently underway) Eagle F. Fairview Avenue and Pine Avenue are ACHD classified roadways and, as such, would be eligible for the use of impact fee revenue to increase their capacity, if such improvement is included in the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) and the Five Year Work Program (FYWP). Idaho Code also allows the use of road impact fee revenue on State Highways, such as Eagle Presidential Sub.cmm Page 4 ~ 4 Road for capacity enhancement. Only one of the improvements recommended by the traffic impact study, the Eagle/Pine signal, is included in the FYWP. Some of the recommended improvements will be necessary in the future to accommodate traffic growth without the traffic that will be generated by this proposal, and the District would be constructing those improvements at the appropriate time, partially funded from impact fee revenue. The large volume that will be generated by the proposed development accelerates the need for those improvements. Staffhas evaluated the relative benefits that will be realized by the eneral traveling public from the various recommended improvements and suggests that they be considered in two categories, system improvements and site related improvements as follows: System Improvements are capital improvements other than asite-related improvement which is a public facility and is designed to provide service to the community at large. The costs of these improvements would be offset from the Road Impact Fees for the project. No system improvements are required with this application, as they have been constructed with MCUP-17-98, or are currently underway as part of that application. Site-related improvements are capita] improvements or right-of--way dedication for direct access to and/or within the proposed project or development. The costs of these improvements, as related to this application, must be borne by the developer of the project: a. Construct a traffic signal at the Eagle Road/Pine Avenue intersection -the District should provide the materials, an~ the developer should install the signal. Part of the expense of the road construction is the District=s responsibility because it will be slightly more than the development actually requires. The provision of the signal equipment by the District will balance that expense. The signal will include provision for Opticom equipment. b. Construct dual southbound left turn lanes on Eagle Road and matching shadow striping or median at the Pine Avenue intersection. c. Construct dual westbound left tum lanes on Pine Avenue at the Eagle Road intfwrs_ection. d. Construct Pine Avenue from Eagle Road east to the eastern property line of this project. The street section will consist of four lanes at Eagle Road east to the full access driveway into the retail center. From that point east to the property line, the street section will consist of 28-feet of pavement with two 3-foot wide -" unpaved shoulders. e. Construct afive-foot sidewalk on Eagle Road abutting the site. G. District policy states that direct access to arterials and collectors is normally restricted and that the developer shall try to use combined access points. in accordance with District policy the applicant should be required to provide a recorded cross access easement among all of the lots in the subdivision for access to the public streets prior to final plat approval. H. District staff is extremely concerned with intemal site access and the possible traffic conflicts within the site and on the adjacent residential subdivision. Staff believes that an improved intemal site circulation system should be designed to minimize those impacts. The proposed Presidential Sub.cmm Page 5 ~ • system could include on-site travel routes parallel to Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue to improve access to the two signalized intersections of Pine Avenue/Eagle Road and Records Drive/Fairview Avenue, but should not be immediately in front of the stores. After discussing this issue with the applicant and his representative, the applicant proposed the following two modifications to the site plan to reduce the impacts on the residential streets and the access road directly in front of the stores: 1. Locate a second driveway on Pine Avenue, 175-feet east of Eagle Road, and lengthen the on-site stacking served by this driveway to a minimum of 50-feet to open up the parking area at the southwest corner of the site. This would allow the vehicles parked in this area additional access to Pine Avenue without using the drive aisle immediately in front of the stores. 2. Design additional access aisles in the northwest corner of the site to provide better access to the western driveway on Fairview Avenue. This will provide additional access to much of the parking area in this part of the site to minimize the traffic attempting to drive to the signalized intersections of Records Avenue/Fairview Avenue and Pine Aventie/Eagle Road. Staff is of the opinion that additional site plan corrections are necessary to provide adequate on- site circulation. The Institute of Transportation publication "Guidelines for Planning and Designing Access Systems for Shopping Centers® states that a shopping center of this magnitude should be constructed with a "ring road" or frontage road near the circumference of the site to expedite the movement of on-site traffic. That consideration is especially important in this situation because of the great distances from some parts of the center to the two signalized intersections with the arterial system. Additional access aisles parallel to Fairview Avenue and Eagle Road would partially satisfy the need for a frontage or ring road. During the Commission meeting, the Commission discussed the merits of expanding the access aisle configuration to function as a continuous vehicular way from Records Drive to Pine Avenue. This way would be interrupted by crossings of the driveways into the site and Presidential Drive; but would greatly increase ease of access to the two signalized intersections serving the site (Records and Pine). The Commission agreed with staff that such opening of the access aisle was necessary and would be included as a Site Specific Requirement. The applicant has previously constructed these improvements to Presidential Drive: .westbound. approach at the Eagle Road/Presidentia] Drive intersection to provide two westbound travel lanes. • westem median in Presidential Drive to provide a left turn lane at the entrance to the project site (at the store fronts). Provide a minimum of 100-feet of storage area for the new tum lane. • full access driveway on Presidential Drive, 340-feet east of Eagle Road. The driveway width should be limited to 30-feet. The minimum storage length should be 50-feet. Install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign at the driveway=s intersection with Presidential Drive. • full-access driveway connection to Presidential Drive at the midpoint between Eagle Road and the project roadway in front of the stores. The minimum storage length Presidential Sub.cmm Page 6 a • should be 50-feet. Install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign at the driveway=s intersection with Presidential Drive. • full access driveway on Presidential Drive as proposed 620-feet east of Eagle Road. The driveway width should be limited to 30-feet. Instal] a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign at the driveway=s intersection with Presidential Drive. J. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. K. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of--way dedicated by this plat should be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this should be required on the final plat. L. As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, may ~. be placed on future development of this parcel. M. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that Tenants gccupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Pat Nelson at 387-6160 for further information. N. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, it is recommended that the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. A Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) is formed with a coordinator that works as a liaison between businesses and private and public transportation providers to increase the use of alternative transportation and other trip reduction measures (shuttle buses, bus pass programs, vanpools, car pools, bicycle and walking enhancements). An•annual survey will be required of the TMA/'fM0 to monitor participation in alternative transportation programs and forwarded to the ACHD Commuteride Office. O. The existing transportation system will be adequate to accommodate the additional traffic generated by this proposed development only with the additional requirements outlined within this, report. The existing transportation system is not adequate for the anticipated traffic volumes without improvement. Recommendations: Special Recommendations to the City of Meridian: Presidential Sub.cmm Page 7 s The Institute of Transportation publication "Guidelines for Planning and Designing Access Systems for Shopping Centers states that a shopping center of this magnitude should be constructed with a ring road or frontage road near the circumference of the site to expedite the movement of on-site traffic. That consideration is especially important in this situation because of the great distances from some parts of the center to the two signalized intersections with the arterial system. The applicant should be required to revise the site plan to provide internal site circulation equivalent to a public street system to ensure that infra-site circulation does not use the public street system to circulate through the adjacent subdivision to gain access to the signalized intersections on Eagle Road and Fairview Avenue. The on-site system should roughly parallel Fairview Avenue and Eagle Road but should not be located immediately in front of the stores. Opening of access aisles located 100-feet or more away from and parallel with Fairview Avenue and Eagle Road will fulfill this requirement. The access aisles should be as direct as possible and provide a means of driving a vehicle from Records Drive to Pine Avenue without interruption except at the major driveways into the site and at Presidential Drive. Coordinate the intemal roadway design with District staff. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that tenants occupying the proposed building consider formation of an Altemative Transportation Program. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Mrs. Pat Nelson at 387-6160. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) are urged to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or• is adjacent to this development. The District would appreciate the formation of such an entity by this complex. Special Recommendations to ITD: The applicant should be required to construct the needed improvements to create dual left-turn lanes on the two Trag~e Road approaches of the Eagle/Pine intersection. The northbound left-. turn lanes are not directly usable by the development. However, they may reduce congestion caused by trips to/from the development and are needed to "shadow" improvements at the Pine Ayenue/Eagle Road intersection. TTie"applicant should construct afive-foot sidewalk on Eagle Road abutting each development phase prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. The construction plans for the development showing the sidewalk should be approved prior to issuance of a building permit. The following Site Specific Requiremeuts and Standard Requiremeuts must be met or provided for prior to ACRD approval of the f nal plat: Site Specific Requirements: Comply with all requirements associated with MCUP-17-98, as approved on September 23, 1998. Presidential Sub.cmm Page 8 ! • 2. Comply with requirements of ITD for Eagle Road (State Highway 55) frontage. Submit to the District a letter from ITD regarding said requirements prior to District approval of the final plat or issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Contact District III Traffic Engineer Lance Johnson at 334-8340. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall enter into a development agreement for the design and construction of the traffic signal at Eagle Road and Pine Avenue, and any associated improvements. The applicant shall provide and install Opticom device (an optical communication device for emergency vehicle pre-emption of the signal operation) as part of the signal installation. The District will provide the materials for the signal (with the exception of the Opticom device) as its share of the entire Pine Avenue construction from Eagle Road to the east boundary of the -. development. The District will also provide signal inspection, and will contribute a portion of the design fee. Submit the signal design to District staff for approval prior to construction. The applicant shall also widen the approach to Eagle Road to provide two westbound left tum lanes, and one westbound through/right-tum lane. Should the ACRD roadway project to extend Pine Avenue from Eagle Road to Cloverdale Road occur prior to this development, all features related to Pine Avenue are to be constructed by the applicant poor to final plat approval, or the cost therefor paid to the District: Specifically, this includes the extra left-turn lanes onto and off of Eagle Road and into the full access driveway from Pine Avenue into the development. 4. Prior to final plat approval, construct Pine Avenue as a 28-foot street section from the project=s eastern property line to Eagle Road abutting'the entire subdivision. Coordinate the roadway design with District staff. 5. Prior to final plat approval, construct afive-foot sidewalk on Pine Avenue from the project=s. eastern property line to Eagle Road abutting the entire subdivision. 6. Construct aright-in/right-out driveway on Pine Avenue a minimum 175-feet east of Eagle Road, latxiited to a' driveway width of 30-feet. The minimum storage length shall be 100-feet. Install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign at the driveway=s intersection with Pine Avenue. A median island shall be installed in Pine Avenue from the stop bar at Eagle Road to a point 50- feet east of the driveway. 7. Construct a full access driveway on Pine Avenue as proposed approximately 340-feet east of Eagle Road, limited to 30-feet of driveway width. The minimum storage length should be 100- feet. Install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign at the driveway=s intersection with Pine Avenue. Presidential Sub.cmm Page 9 • s Construct a full access driveway on Pine Avenue as proposed approximately 620-feet east of Eagle Road, limited to a driveway width of 30-feet. Install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign at the driveway=s intersection with Pine Avenue. Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Pine Avenue is prohibited. 10. Other than the previously approved driveways on Presidential Drive, direct lot or parcel access to Presidential Drive is prohibited. The approved driveways shall be: • located 175-feet east of Eagle Road. The driveway width shall be limited to 30-feet, with the minimum storage length of 50-feet. Install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign at the driveway=s intersection with Presidential Drive. • located at the midpoint (340-feet from Eagle Road) between Eagle Road and the project roadway in front of the stores. The driveway width shall be limited to 30-feet, with the minimum storage length of 50-feet. Install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign at the driveway=s intersection with Presidential Drive. • _ located 620-feet east of Eagle Road. The driveway width shall be limited to30-feet, with the minimum storage length of 50-feet. Install a 36" by 36" high intensity STOP sign at the driveway=s intersection with Presidential Drive. 11. Prior to any occupancy within Presidential Subdivision, construct and install traffic calming facilities on Presidential Drive beginning at the eastern property line of the development and extending through the intersection with Fillmore Way. Coordinate the design and placement of the calming facilities with District staff and the Crossroads Subdivision Owners Association. 12. Create a vehicular way behind the pads fronting on Fairview Avenue and Eagle Road (approximately 100-feet into the site) to connect Records Drive and Pine Avenue. Install curb returns at the intersections of this vehicular way with Records Drive and Presidential Drive. Instal] STOP signs on the access aisles intersecting with this vehicular way and install STOP signs on the vehicular way at its intersections with Records Drive, the five major driveways into the site, Presidential-Drive and Pine Avenue. Coordinate the location of the vehicular way with District staff. 13. Provide a recorded cross access easement among all of the lots in the subdivision for access to thepublic streets prior to final plat approval. Standard Requirements: A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the ACRD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written exylanation of why such a reauirement would result in a substantial hardshtn or tneautty. The wntten request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for ACRD Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Presidential Sub.cmm Page 10 l • Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. ! After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall s ecifical] identi each re uirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its on 'nal decision. The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of th'e date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. 3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. ` 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 5. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway.District prior to District approval for occupancy. ~. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of--way. Existing utilities $amaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the, applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking Found within ACHD right-of--way. The applicant shall contact RCHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACRD conduits (spare or filled) are ~ampromised during any phase of construction. 8. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 9. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject Presidential Sub.cmm Page 11 _ • . ~ property unless awaiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusion of Law: 1. ACRD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. . Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Planning and Development I Division at 387-6170. i Submitted bv: Commission Action: Planning and Development Staff Au ust 23 2000 Presidential Sub.cmm Page 12 W .- ~ O 0 0 w 0 ~~ 0 0 co N O O Z • EAGLE RD '0 Z m ~< m C7 s Z rn -~ n C W ~o O