Agency Commentsf ~~~3
~~~~~~
co~~o ~:~
November 15, 2010
To: Boise Hunter Homes
1025 S. Bridgeway Place, Ste. 290
Eagle, ID 83616
Subject: Kingsbridge Phase 2 & 3 / MPP-10-007
Eagle Road &Kingsbridge Drive
Sherry R. Huber, President
Rebecca W. Arnold, Vice President
John S. Franden, Commissioner
Carol A. McKee, Commissioner
Sarah M. Baker, Commissioner
On November 15, 2010 the Ada County Highway District acted on your application for the above
referenced project. The attached report lists site-specific requirements, conditions of approval and
street improvements, which are required.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (208) 387-6174.
Sincerely,
~~-
Jarom Wagoner
Planner II
Right-of-Way & Development Services
Ada County Highway District
CC: Project file
City of Meridian (sent via email)
NorthSide Management, LLC (sent via email)
Ada County Highway District • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 208-387-6100 • FX 345-7650 • www.achdidaho.org
Right-of-Way & Development Services
_ Department
'~'~~~~
~/on,.nw~"uel~o ~ico
Project/File: Kingsbridge Phase 2 8~ 3 /MPP-10-007
This application is for preliminary plat approval of 72-residential lots and 7-common
lots on 38.31 acres. The site is located east of Eagle Road at the current terminus of
Kingsbridge Drive in Meridian, Idaho.
Lead Agency: City of Meridian
Site address: Eagle Road &Kingsbridge Drive
Staff Approval: November 15, 2010
Applicant: Boise Hunter Homes
1025 S. Bridgeway Place, Ste. 290
Eagle, ID 83616
Representative: NorthSide Management, LLC
Scott Noriyuki
3106 Ridgeway Drive
Boise, ID 83702
Staff Contact: Jarom Wagoner
Phone: 387-6174
E-mail: iwaaoner(p~achdidaho.org
Tech Review: November 15, 2010
A. Findings of Fact
1. Description of Application: The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval of 72
residential lots on 38.31 acres. The site was originally approved as part of Kingsbridge
Subdivision. From that application the first phase, Kingsbridge Phase 1, was completed after
which the property lay dormant and thus the approvals have expired for the other two phases.
This application is to re-establish those entitlements. There are variations in lot and street
layout from the original design.
2.
D t' n of Ad'acent Surroundin Area•
escn
Direction io
Land Use
Zonin
North Rural-Urban Transition Zone RUT
South Rural-Urban Transition Zone RUT
East Rural-Urban Transition Zone RUT
West Low-Density Residential District R-2
3. Site History: ACRD Commission previously reviewed this site as Kingsbridge
Subdivision/MPP-05-004 in February of 2004. The requirements of this staff report are
consistent with those of the prior action.
Kingsbridge Phase 2 & 3/MPP-10-007
4. Adjacent Development: The following developments are pending or underway in the vicinity of
the site:
• Harcourt Subdivision, 60-residential lots on 22-acres, located directly northwest of the site, staff
level approval received November 21, 2006. The developer has recently filed a 24-month time
extension for this property.
5. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any
building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in
effect at that time.
6. Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)/Five Year Work Plan (FYWP):
• Eagle Road is scheduled in the Five Year Work Plan to be widened to 5-lanes from Victory
Road to Copper Point Drive. Construction of this project is currently underway and is
anticipated to be completed in early 2011.
The intersection of Eagle Road and Victory Road is scheduled in the Five Year Work Plan to be
widened to 5-lanes on the north leg, 5-lanes on the south leg, 5-lanes on the east leg, and 5-
lanes on the west leg. Construction of this project is currently underway and is anticipated to be
completed in early 2011.
Eagle Road is listed in the Capital Improvements Plan to be widened to 5-lanes from Victory
Road to Amity Road between 2014 and 2018.
B. Traffic Findings for Consideration
1. Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 690 additional vehicle trips per
day (none existing); 72 additional vehicle trips per hour in the PM peak hour (none existing),
based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8~' edition.
2. Condition of Area Roadways
Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour (VPH)
PM Peak PM Peak Existing
Roadway Frontage Functional Hour Hour Level Plus
Classification Traffic Count of Service Pro'ect
Principal 315 Better than Better
"
Ea le Road
g None Arterial "E" than "E
Kingsbridge 50-feet Residential N/A N/A N/A
Street Collector
*Acceptable level of service for atwo-lane principal arterial is "E" (690 VPH).
* Acceptable level of service for atwo-lane collector is "D" (425 VPH).
3. Average Daily Traffic Count (VDT)
Average daily traffic counts are based on ACHD's most current traffic counts.
• The average daily traffic count for Eagle Road north of Amity Road was 6,254 on
February 5, 2009.
C. Findings for Consideration
1. Plans and Studies
Southwest Boise Transportation Study
The Southwest Boise Transportation Study (SWBS) is a regional study that identifies future
roadway improvements, collector roadway connections, intersection and corridor needs in
2 Kingsbridge Phase 2 & 3/MPP-10-007
Southwest Boise. The study helps ACHD plan for and accommodate future traffic demand in
the Southwest Boise area. The study was created in collaboration with the City of Boise and
was adopted by the ACRD Commission in May of 2009.
2. Internal Collector Roadway (Kingsbridge Drive)
a. Existing Conditions: The site has no internal collector roadways. Kingsbridge Drive
currently dead ends at its eastern terminus abutting the site. To that point, Kingsbridge Drive
is improved with 2-travel lanes, vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk within 50-feet of right-of-way
(25-feet from centerline).
b. Policy
Residential Collector Policy: District policy 72-F1A, 7202.3.2 and 7202.3.5, requires that
residential collectors be constructed as 36-foot street sections with curb, gutter and 5-foot
wide concrete sidewalks with no front-on housing. The access restrictions for these street
segments should be stated on the final plat. Unless otherwise noted, parking should be
prohibited on these street segments. Coordinate the signage program with District staff.
Sidewalk Policy: District policy requires 7-foot wide attached (or 5-foot detached) concrete
sidewalk on all collector roadways and arterial roadways (7204.7.2).
c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct Kingsbridge Drive from its
current terminus 300-feet to the east with its intersection of Newbridge Avenue as a standard
36-foot residential collector. From that point on, Kingsbridge Drive is proposed to continue to
the east as a standard 36-foot wide local street.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District Policy and
should be approved, as proposed. The residential collector segment of Kingsbridge Drive,
from its current terminus to Newbridge Avenue, should be constructed as a 36-foot residential
collector roadway with vertical curb, gutter and 5-foot wide detached (or 7-foot wide attached)
concrete sidewalks. Parking and front-on housing are prohibited on residential collector
roadways. Coordinate a signage program for NO PARKING signs with District Traffic
Services and Development Review staff.
The local segment of Kingsbridge Drive, from Newbridge Avenue to the east property line,
should be constructed as a 36-foot local street section with vertical curb, gutter and 5-foot
wide detached (or 7-foot wide attached) concrete sidewalks. Traffic volumes on this segment
of Kingsbridge Drive are not anticipated to reach collector volumes even after the roadway is
extended to the east (as development occurs), due to planned collector roadways shown on
the MSM. However, staff recommends that no more than the five proposed lots (Lots 32-36)
be allowed to front-on the local segment of Kingsbridge Drive. Additionally, staff is supportive
of the applicant's proposal for the shared driveways between Lots 32 & 33 and Lots 34 & 35.
3. Internal Local Streets
a. Existing Conditions: The site has no internal local streets.
b. Policy
36-Foot Street Section Policy: District policy 7204.4.2 states, "developments with any
buildable lot that is less that 1-acre in size will typically provide streets having a minimum
pavement width of 32-feet with curb, gutter and sidewalks. The total street width shall be 36-
feet from back-of-curb to back-of-curb. Variations of this width may be allowed, depending on
traffic volumes forecast to be generated by the development. Concrete sidewalks shall be a
minimum of 5-feet in width unless they are separated from the curb 5-feet or more in which
case the sidewalk shall be a minimum of 4-feet in width.
Turnaround Policy: District policy 7205.2.1 requires turnarounds to be constructed to provide
a minimum turning radius of 45-feet. Landscape and parking islands may be constructed in
turnarounds if a minimum inside curb radius of 28-feet, and a minimum outside radius of 45-
3 Kingsbridge Phase 2 & 3/MPP-10-007
feet are provided. The pavement width shall be sufficient to allow the turning around of a
standard AASHTO SU design vehicle without backing.
c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct the internal local roadways as
36-foot street sections with vertical curb, gutter and 5-foot concrete sidewalks within 50-feet of
right-of-way. The applicant has proposed to construct four cul-de-sac turnarounds within the
development.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District Policy and
should be approved as proposed.
4. Roadway Offsets
a. Existing Conditions: There are no roadway offsets internal to the development.
b. Policy
Local Offset Policy: District policy 7204.11.6, requires local roadways to align or offset a
minimum of 150-feet from a residential collector roadway (measured centerline to centerline).
District policy 7204.11.6, requires local roadways to align or offset a minimum of 125-feet from
another local roadway (measured centerline to centerline).
c. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing numerous roadway offsets within the
development. All roadway offsets are from local/local intersections and have an offset
distance of greater than 125-feet.
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District policy and
should be approved, as proposed
5. Stub Streets
a. Existing Conditions: There are existing streets stubbed to the site. Kingsbridge Drive,
located approximately 480-feet north of the Ten Mile Lateral. Darlington Way, located
approximately 1,050-feet north of the Ten Mile Lateral.
b. Policy
Stub Street Policy: District policy 7203.5.1 states that the street design in a proposed
development shall cause no undue hardship to adjoining property. An adequate and
convenient access to adjoining property for use in future development may be required. If a
street ends at the development boundary, it shall meet the requirements of sub section 7205,
"non-continuous streets." District policy 7205.5 states that stub streets will be required to
provide intra-neighborhood circulation or to provide access to adjoining properties. Stub
streets will conform with the requirements described in Section 7204.5, 7204.6 and 7204.7,
except a temporary cul-de-sac will not be required if the stub street has a length no greater
than 150-feet. A sign shall be installed at the terminus of the stub street stating that, "THIS
ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE."
District policy 7203.5.2 states that an existing street or a street in an approved preliminary
plat, which ends at a boundary of a proposed development, shall be extended in that
development. The extension shall include provisions for continuation of storm drainage
facilities.
Temporary Turnaround Policy: District policy 7205.2 requires construction of a temporary
cul-de-sac with the same dimensional requirements as a standard cul-de-sac, with a minimum
turning radius of 45-feet where curb is required and 42-feet where curb is not required. The
pavement width shall be sufficient to allow the turning around of a standard AASHTO SU
design vehicle without backing. If a temporary turnaround is proposed to be located within a
future building lot, the temporary turnaround easement shall be for the entire building lot to
prevent the easement from being constructed over.
4 Kingsbridge Phase 2 & 3/MPP-10-007
c. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct two stub streets, one to the
north and one to the east. There locations are to be:
stub street to the north located between Lot 31 and Lot 58 approximately 1,300-feet south
of Victory Road and 2,425-feet east of Eagle Road (measured centerline to centerline).
• stub street to the east located between Lot 26 and Lot 29 approximately 2,200-feet south
of Victory Road and 2,650-feet east of Eagle Road (measured centerline to centerline).
d. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District Policy and
should be approved, as proposed. The applicant should be required to construct a temporary
turnaround at the terminus of both stub streets as they are in excess of 150-feet in length and
install signs at the terminus of the stub streets stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE
EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE."
6. Driveways
Kingsbridge Drive
a. Existing Conditions: There are no driveways on Kingsbridge Drive.
b. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing two shared driveways and one single
driveway on Kingsbridge Drive east of Newbridge Avenue. The shared driveways are
proposed between Lots 32 & 33 and Lots 34 & 35. Lot 36 is proposed to have a single
driveway.
c. Staff Comments/Recommendations: The applicant's proposal meets District Policy and
should be approved, as proposed.
7. Tree Planters
Tree Planter Policy: Tree Planter Policy: The District's Tree Planter Policy prohibits all trees in
planters less than 8-feet in width without the installation of root barriers. Class II trees may be
allowed in planters with a minimum width of 8-feet, and Class I and Class III trees may be
allowed in planters with a minimum width of 10-feet.
8. Landscaping
Landscaping Policy: A license agreement is required for all landscaping proposed within
ACHD right-of-way or easement areas. Trees shall be located no closer than 10-feet from all
public storm drain facilities. Landscaping should be designed to eliminate site obstructions in
vision triangles at intersections. District Policy 5104.3.1 requires a 40-foot vision triangle and a
3-foot height restriction on all landscaping located at an uncontrolled intersection and a 50-foot
offset from stop signs. Landscape plans are required with the submittal of civil plans and must
meet all District requirements prior to signature of the final plat and/or approval of the civil plans.
D. Site Specific Conditions of Approval
1. Construct Kingsbridge Drive as a residential collector with a 36-foot street section, vertical curb,
gutter and 5-foot wide detached (or 7-foot wide attached) concrete sidewalk from its current
terminus to its intersection with Newbridge Avenue, as proposed. Parking and front-on housing
are prohibited on this segment of Kingsbridge Drive. Coordinate a signage program for NO
PARKING signs with District Traffic Services and Development Review staff.
2. Construct all internal local streets as 36-foot street sections with vertical curb, gutter and 5-foot
wide concrete sidewalks within 50-feet of right-of-way, as proposed.
4. Construct two shared driveways on Kingsbridge Drive, as proposed. The shared driveways
shall be between Lots 32 and 33 and Lots 34 and 35. Pave the driveway its full width at least
30-feet in to the site beyond the edge of pavement.
5 Kingsbridge Phase 2 & 3/MPP-10-007
5. Construct a stub street to the north, Stockenham Avenue, located between Lot 31 and Lot 58
approximately 1,300-feet south of Victory Road and 2,425-feet east of Eagle Road (measured
centerline to centerline), as proposed. Provide a temporary turnaround at the terminus of the
roadway, and install a sign stating, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE."
6. Construct a stub street to the east, Kingsbridge Drive, located between Lot 26 and Lot 29
approximately 2,200-feet south of Victory Road and 2,650-feet east of Eagle Road (measured
centerline to centerline), as proposed. Provide a temporary turnaround at the terminus of the
roadway, and install a sign stating, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE."
7. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
E. Standard Conditions of Approval
1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACHD right-of-way
2. Private sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within the ACRD right-
of-way.
3. In accordance with District policy, 7203.6, the applicant may be required to update any
existing non-compliant pedestrian improvements abutting the site to meet current
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The applicant's engineer should
provide documentation of ADA compliance to District Development Review staff for
review.
4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged
during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at
387-6280 (with file number) for details.
5. A license agreement and compliance with the District's Tree Planter policy is required for
all landscaping proposed within ACRD right-of-way or easement areas.
6. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall
be borne by the developer.
7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way.
The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant.
The applicant shall be required to calf DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) at least two full business
days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact
ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are
compromised during any phase of construction.
8. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in
writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file
numbers) for details.
9. Alt design and construction shall be in accordance with the ACHD Policy Manual, ISPWC
Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all
applicable ACHD Standards unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in
the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
10. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements of ACHD prior to District approval for occupancy.
11. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in
writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an
authorized representative of ACRD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain
written confirmation of any change from ACHD.
6 Kingsbridge Phase 2 & 3/MPP-10-007
12. If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACHD Planning Review will review the
site plan and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that
time. Any change in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to comply with ACHD Policy and Standard
Conditions of Approval in place at that time unless awaiver/variance of the requirements
or other legal relief is granted by the ACHD Commission.
F. Conclusions of Law
1. The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of
Approval are satisfied.
2. ACHD requirements are consistent with applicable federal, state and local laws.
Attachments
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site Plan
3. Utility Coordinating Council
4. Development Process Checklist
5. Request for Reconsideration Guidelines
7 Kingsbridge Phase 2 & 3/MPP-10-007
Vicinity Map
Site Plan
~~-
__ ~ ~ I t
~~ arwwn` ~ ` 1,` ~ ~ ~a t ~~`a -,~7-
~~ jj \\ 1 1
ii ff \ ^^ j 1~
I I 1 i4 ~`d ~ AI 1M~d_ I ~n !~
1 I I 1 It ~~ T' ~ '
i5 I 1 1 1 1 x t --.~1_--~
_~ ~ 1 I 1 1 I ® 6 I ~ui- I I
I 1 ,
1 ~ , x~,rp.-' ~~~
^f I' / a} EI.
1
•~ I ~o ~I •p ~ ~' I ~-~-W I ~~yr I - ~' ~ M~
` ,,, ~ ~n 1 ~~ S ~I fa ----~~- +n ~ ~ _ ~c _ p oaf
~~~ ® ~ as E G rte- _ r I ~~` ~ ~ ~^ 1 ~I ~ i ~e I ~~ i ~ ,
1
1 1 w ~
~° --
I J Gr rY --JL-
I ~ ~ ~
>: - ~I -~
0 yy~~ gg
1 ~ S~ ~I
' 1
I
I
! x
i~ _`_xtar--I-----------~--[~~ ----i-- ----a--
/il ,
4 ~ 1 I 1 ~ I
1 1
1
1
I I I 1 ~
p ----~-- _ _ {~-- e-
61~j 1 n i~~I^Il~A~~a+n,~~;~~,i~l~j '~i~~~~~~` ~~~~{p},11~ ~~~~ ~~~~ [r=~~ i)~r :~j~ ~ ~ ~
~ S
:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ;,~ l,~~i~=i~j~~~~ ~j~'l~~~ °~ ~ ! ~ ~ i ~- ~ gyp: ~.
ii l ~_ ~,
b e r ~ i i I { `~ ~~ r4 Project Overview Idnpsbrldpe Subdiviaton
ff t~ Lot Dlmensto~a Phase 2 ~ 3
0 1 ; ~ P, ~ ~ Pre4mfnary Plat ~ ~~~
8 Kingsbridge Phase 2 & 3/MPP-10-007
Ada County Utility Coordinating Council
Developer/Local Improvement District
Right of Way Improvements Guideline Request
Purpose: To develop the necessary avenue for proper notification to utilities of local highway
and road improvements, to help the utilities in budgeting and to clarify the already existing process.
1) Notification: Within five (5) working days upon notification of required right of way
improvements by Highway entities, developers shall provide written notification to the affected
utility owners and the Ada County Utility Coordinating Council (UCC). Notification shall include
but not be limited to, project limits, scope of roadway improvements/project, anticipated
construction dates, and any portions critical to the right of way improvements and coordination
of utilities.
2) Plan Review: The developer shall provide the highway entities and all utility owners with
preliminary project plans and schedule a plan review conference. Depending on the scale of
utility improvements, a plan review conference may not be necessary, as determined by the
utility owners. Conference notification shall also be sent to the UCC. During the review meeting
the developer shall notify utilities of the status of right of way/easement acquisition necessary
for their project. At the plan review conference each company shall have the right to appeal,
adjust and/or negotiate with the developer on its own behalf. Each utility shall provide the
developer with a letter of review indicating the costs and time required for relocation of its
facilities. Said letter of review is to be provided within thirty calendar days after the date of the
plan review conference.
3) Revisions: The developer is responsible to provide utilities with any revisions to preliminary
plans. Utilities may request an updated plan review meeting if revisions are made in the
preliminary plans which affect the utility relocation requirements. Utilities shall have thirty days
after receiving the revisions to review and comment thereon.
4) Final Notification: The developer will provide highway entities, utility owners and the UCC with
final notification of its intent to proceed with right of way improvements and include the
anticipated date work will commence. This notification shall indicate that the work to be
performed shall be pursuant to final approved plans by the highway entity. The developer shall
schedule a preconstruction meeting prior to right of way improvements. Utility relocation activity
shall be completed within the times established during the preconstruction meeting, unless
otherwise agreed upon.
Notification to the Ada County UCC can be sent to: 50 S. Cole Rd. Boise 83707, or Visit
iducc.com for a-mail notification information.
9 Kingsbridge Phase 2 & 3/MPP-10-007
Development Process Checklist
Items Completed to Date:
®Submit a development application to a City or to Ada County
®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD
®The ACHD Planning Review Section will receive the development application to review
®The Planning Review Section will do one of the following:
^Send a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific conditions of
approval at this time.
®Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation
system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
^Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the
transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
^For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" letter:
• The applicant should submit one set of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the
Development Review Section for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are
no site improvements required by ACHD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of
impact fee assessment.)
• The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the
right-of-way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility
cuts.
^Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval.
DlD YOU REMEMBER:
Construction (Non-Subdivisions)
^ Driveway or Property Approach(s)
• Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to ACRD Construction (for approval by Development Services
& Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval.
^ Working in the ACHD Right-of-Way
• Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use
Permit Application" to ACRD Construction -Permits along with:
a) Traffic Control Plan
b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50'
or you are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt.
Construction (Subdivisions)
^ Sediment & Erosion Submittal
• At least one week prior to setting up aPre-Construction Meeting an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative &
Plan, done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACHD Construction to be reviewed and
approved by the ACHD Stormwater Section.
^ Idaho Power Company
• Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con
being scheduled.
^ Final Approval from Development Services is required prior to scheduling aPre-Con.
10 Kingsbridge Phase 2 & 3/MPP-10-007
Request for Appeal of Staff Decision
Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an
applicant of the final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the
ROWDS Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the
relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted
arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy
Manual.
Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to
be charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover
administrative costs.
Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with
the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10)
working days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the
appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed,
identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state
the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary
of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and
law relied upon and shall include a written argument in support of the
appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of appeal that does
not comply with the provisions of this subsection.
Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from
the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the
appeal, and may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the
matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision that is being
appealed. A copy of the reply and any modifications to the decision being
appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing
on the appeal.
Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing
of the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at
a regular meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery
to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A
copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply
shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the
hearing.
Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either
affirm or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or
supplement the decision being appealed, as such action is adequately
supported by the law and evidence presented at the hearing.
11 Kingsbridge Phase 2 & 3/MPP-10-007
~~ •
•
• •
f ~ ~ ~ ~ Dint School Dlstrlct No. 2
1303 E.Central Drive • Meridian, Idaho 83642 • (208) 855-4500 • Fax (208) 350-5962
SUPERINTENDENT
Dr. Linda Clark
November 2, 2010
City of Meridian
City Clerk's Office
Attn: Jaycee Holman
33 East Broadway Avenue
Meridian, ID 83642
Dear Planners:
Joint School District No. 2 has experienced phenomenal student growth in the last ten years. Nearly
every high school, middle school, and elementary school throughout the district is operating at or over
capacity. Approval of the Kin sg bridge Subdivision will have an impact on school enrollment at Lake
Hazel Elementary School, Lake Hazel Middle School and Mountain View High School in Joint School
District No. 2. Based on U.S. census data, we can predict that these homes, when completed, will
house 58 school aged children.
Joint School District No. 2 supports economic growth. However, growth fosters the need for additional
school capacity. Revenue support from developers of new residential subdivisions is required for the
purchase of the school sites necessary to serve the proposed subdivision. Joint School District No.2
estimates the revenue required for the purchase of future school sites is $830.00 per new home unit.
The approval of Kin sg bridge Subdivision will create the need for $59,760.00 in revenue to purchase
the school sites this subdivision will require. In lieu of these sources of revenue, the district will accept
the donation of land appropriate for school sites. Such sites will need water and sewer service
available, and prior to the commencement of construction, the district will need to pass a bond issue
for the construction of schools.
Residents cannot be assured of attending the neighborhood school as it may be necessary to bus
students to available classrooms across the district. We ask that you require the developer to provide
safe walkways, bike baths and safe pedestrian access for our students.
School capacity is addressed in Idaho code 67-6508. Joint School District No. 2 is currently operating
beyond capacity. Future development will continue to have an impact on the district's capacity.
Sincerely,
Bruce Gestrin Ph.D.
Assistant Superintendent
Page 1 of 1
Machelle Hill
From: Larry Strough [Larry.Strough@itd.idaho.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 10:32 AM
To: Machelle Hill
Cc: Pam Golden
Subject: PP 10-007
Attachments: img-Y03093113-0001.pdf
ITD has no comment on the enclosed notice.
Thank You
Larry Strough
334-8924
v~.~~
11 /3/2010
arm a ~sr~~aw ~ u~ D~r~r
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-463-0092
Phones: Area Code 208
City of Meridian
City Clerk's Office
Jaycee Holman
3~ E Broaddvay :4venae Ste 102
Meridian, ID 83642-2619
OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861
SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
RE: PP 10-007/Kingsbridge
Dear Jaycee:
If all storm drainage is retained on-site there will be no impact on Nampa & Meridian
Irrigation District and no further review will be required.
If any surface drainage leaves the site, the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District requires that
a Land Use Change Application is filed for review prior to final platting. Please contact Suzy
Hewlett at 466-7861 for further information.
This proposed project impacts facilities governed by Boise Project Board of Control. Please
contact Bob Carter, Boise Project -Board of Control, at 344-1141 or 2465 Overland Rd.,
Room 202, Boise, Idaho 83705-3173.
Sincerely,
F ~.
P. Anderson
ater Superintendent
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District
JPA/dbg
C: Each Board
D. Coon
G. Curtis
File
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
9 November 2010
~ ~ nr~~~a.~ ~~ air
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-463-0092
Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampa 466.7861
Scott Noriyuki SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
NorthSide Management, LLC
3109 Ridgeway Drive
Boise, ID 83702
RE: Land Use Change Application - Kinpsbridpe
Please note the District now requires three (3) sets of clans
Dear Mr. Noriyuki:
Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to file with the Irrigation
District for its review on the above-referenced development. If this development is under a
"rush" to be finalized, I would recommend that you submit a cashier's check, money order or
cash as payment of the fees in order to speed the process up. If you submit a company or
personal check, it must clear the bank before processing the application.
Should this development be planning a pressure urban irrigation system that will be owned,
operated and maintained by the Irrigation District, I strongly urge you to coordinate with John P.
Anderson, Water Superintendent for the Irrigation District, concerning the installation of the
pressure system. Enclosed is a questionnaire that you must fill out and return in order to initiate
the process of contractual agreements between the owner or developer and the Irrigation
District for the ownership, operation and maintenance of the pressure urban irrigation system.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call on me at the District's
office, or John P. Anderson, at the District's shop.
Sincerely,
Suzette G. Hewlett, Asst. Secretary/Treasurer
NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
SGH/smc
cc: File
Water Superintendent
Jaycee Holman, City of Meridian
Kingsbridge Properties, LLC, 661 S. Rivershore Lane, #120, Eagle, ID
Boise Hunter Homes, 1025 S. Bridgeway Place, Suite 290, Eagle, ID 8 ~O~ 1
enc.
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
9 November 2010
CENTRAL
•• DISTRICT
pITHEALTN
DEPARTMENT
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
Environmental Health Division
Retum to:
^ Boise
^ ~9~
®Me'
^~
^ACZ
^~'
Rezone #
Conditional Use #
Preliminary /Final /Short Plat ~~ - 14 -dC~'~7
Kr~lGzs 32~~C .S'J,Q~1 ~'~.SrO.J
^1. We have No Objections to this Proposal.
^2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal.
^3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal.
^4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment.
^5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of:
^ high seasonal ground water ^ waste flow characteristics
^ bedrock from original grade ^ other
^6. This office may require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters andlor
surface waters.
^7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and
water availability.
~8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for:
®..central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well
^ interim sewage f~central water
^ individual sewage ^ individual water
~9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality:
~ central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water
^ sewage dry lines central water
~-10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
^ 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other
considerations indicate approval.
^12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State
Sewage Regulations.
^13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any:
^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center
^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store
^14. Please see attached stormwater management recommendations
^ 15. Reviewed By
Dater/~/~
Review Sheet
15726-001EH0904