Loading...
Agency Comments~~3 ~~~ eo,~cxa ~:~ August 30, 2010 To: Russell D. & Karen Hunemiller 3299 W. Davis Lane Meridian, ID 83642 Subject: Barletta Subdivision 3299 W. Davis Lane Sherry R. Huber, President Rebecca W. Arnold, Vice President John S. Franden, Commissioner Carol A. McKee, Commissioner Sarah M. Baker, Commissioner On August 27, 2010 the Ada County Highway District acted on your application for the above referenced project. The attached report lists site-specific requirements, conditions of approval and street improvements, which are required. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (208) 387-6174. Sincerely, SP~a~ Jarom Wagoner Planner II Right-of-Way & Development Services Ada County Highway District CC: Project file City of Meridian (sent via email) Engineering Solutions, LLP (sent via email) Ada County Highway District • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 208-387-6100 • FX 345-7650 • www.achd.ada.id.us Right-of--Way & Development Services f _ Department }+~ ~~~~ ~iomgwv'~`ul~o StiLt~ico Project/File: Barletta Subdivision This application is for annexation, rezone, a preliminary plat for 2 residential parcels and 2 common lots of 5.94 acres. The site is located at 3299 W. Davis Lane, Meridian, Idaho. Lead Agency: City of Meridian Site address: 3299 W. Davis Lane Staff Approval: August 27, 2010 Applicant: Russell & Karen Hunemiller 3299 W. Davis Lane Meridian, ID 83642 Representative: Engineering Solutions Becky McKay 1029 N. Rosario Street, Suite 100 Meridian, ID 83642 Staff Contact: Jarom Wagoner Phone: 387-6174 E-mail: iwa4oner(a~achdidaho.org Tech Review: August 23, 2010 A. Findings of Fact 1. Description of Application: The applicant is requesting to annex approximately 5.94 acres into the city of Meridian. The property is currently within unincorporated Ada County and is zoned R-1. The applicant is requesting a zoning designation of R-2. The R-2 zone allows a maximum of 2 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is also requesting approval of the preliminary plat for Barletta Subdivision. Barletta Subdivision consists of 2 residential parcels and 2 common lots. 2. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area: Direction Land Use Zonin North Estate Residential Zone R1 South Estate Residential Zone R1 East Mixed Em to ment Zone M-E West Estate Residential Zone R1 3. Site History: ACHD has not previously reviewed this site for a development application. 4. Adjacent Development: The following developments are pending or underway in the vicinity of the site: • Southridge Subdivision, 206 residential lots, located adjacent to the site on the east side of S. Ten Mile Road, the Commission approved the preliminary plat on September 11, 2007. 2 Barletta Subdivision • MAZ-08-015, annexation and rezone of 36.27 acres from RUT to M-E zoning, located approximately'/4 mile northeast of the site, staff level approval on February 18, 2009. • Southridge West Commercial Subdivision, annexation and rezone of 15 acres from R1 to M-E and R-8 zoning, located adjacent to the site on the east side of S. Ten Mile Road, staff level approval on April 22, 2010. 5. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that time. 6. B. 1. 2. Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)/Five Year Work Plan (FYWP): • S. Ten Mile Road is scheduled in the Five Year Work Plan to be widened to 5-lanes from the ITD Ten Mile Interchange project to the new W. Overland Road intersection in 2011. Traffic Findings for Consideration Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 10 additional vehicle trips per day (10 existing); 1 additional vehicle trip per hour in the PM peak hour (1 existing), based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th edition. Condition of Area Roadways Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour (VPH) Functional PM Peak PM Peak Existing Roadway Frontage Hour Hour Level Plus Classification Traffic Count of Service Pro'ect S. Ten Mile 104-feet Principal 890 Better than Better " " Road Arterial "E" than E W. Overland Principal Better than Better Road None Arterial 374 «E" than "E" 3. *Acceptable level of service for afive-lane principal arterial is "E" (1,770 VPH). Average Daily Traffic Count (VDT) Average daily traffic counts are based on ACHD's most current traffic counts. The average daily traffic count for S. Ten Mile Road north of W. Overland Road was 8,717 on May 27, 2009. The average daily traffic count for W. Overland Road east of S. Ten Mile Road was 3,051 on January 13, 2010. C. Findings for Consideration 1. Plans and Studies South Meridian Transportation Plan The South Meridian Transportation Plan (SMTP) is a long range planning tool used to identify future roadway, intersection, and corridor needs in the South Meridian Area. Providing a framework for future roadway improvements based on the land use designations. The plan was created in collaboration with the City of Meridian and was adopted by the ACRD Commission in September of 2009. 2. S. Ten Mile Road a. Existing Conditions: S. Ten Mile Road is improved with 2-travel lanes and no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. However, this segment of S. Ten Mile Road is part of the Five Year Work Plan and is to be widened to 5-lanes in late 2010, early 2011 with curb, gutter and 3 Barletta Subdivision sidewalk. There is currently 73-feet of right-of-way for S. Ten Mile Road (25-feet from centerline), with an additional 31-feet of right-of-way in the acquisition stage abutting the property. This will bring the total right-of-way abutting the site to 106-feet. b. Policy Arterial Roadway Policy: District Policy 7203.4.3 states that if a proposed development abuts an arterial street, the developer shall provide sidewalk along the paved frontage and dedicate right-of-way required by the proposed land use and scale of the project. Right-of-Way and Street Section Policy: District policy requires 96-feet of right-of-way on arterial roadways (Figure 72-F1 B). This right-of-way allows for the construction of a 5-lane roadway with curb, gutter, 5-foot wide concrete detached sidewalks and bike lanes. Sidewalk Policy: District policy requires 7-foot wide attached (or 5-foot wide detached) concrete sidewalk on all collector roadways and arterial roadways (7204.7.2). c. ACRD Master Street Map: ACRD Policy Section 3111.1 requires the Master Street Map (MSM) guide the right-of-way acquisition, collector street requirements, and specific roadway features required through development. This segment of Ten Mile Road is designated in the MSM as a Planned Commercial Arterial with 5-lanes and on-street bike lanes, an 82-foot street section within 108-feet of right-of-way. d. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is proposing to dedicate 56-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of S. Ten Mile Road. e. Staff Comments/Recommendations: Staff is currently working with the applicant in acquiring right-of-way in conjunction with the S. Ten Mile Road widening project. The applicant should be required to have the right-of-way documents signed before ACHD Commissioners signature on the final plat. The applicant would normally be required to construct a 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk abutting the site. However, since the S. Ten Mile Road widening project has already been designed and given its anticipated start date staff recommends a modification of policy to allow the applicant to either: a) provide ACHD with a road trust deposit in the amount of $2,100 (two-thousand one-hundred dollars) for the cost of constructing the sidewalk or b) delay the completion of their project until the contract for construction has been formally awarded. District Policy 7203.4.5 states that if a proposed development abuts a street that the District has programmed for improvement, the developer will have no financial requirement for improvements of the abutting street if: a. The District has formally awarded a contract for the construction of the street improvements before the development application is received; and b. The District's project includes all improvements required by the DEVELOPMENT POLICY MANUAL. The anticipated start date for the S. Ten Mile Road project is late 2010 to early 2011, with expected bids for construction to be received in October of 2010. ACRD can give the applicant no guarantees regarding these projected start dates, however barring any unforeseen delays this should provide the applicant sufficient time to complete their hearing process with the city of Meridian. This will allow the applicant to submit their final development applications with the District after the formal awarding of the S. Ten Mile Road construction contract and thus negate the requirement of condition #2 as stated in the Site Specific Conditions of Approval. 4 Barletta Subdivision 3. Private Roads a. Private Road Policy: District policy 7205.6 states that other jurisdictions in Ada County establish the requirements for private streets. The District retains authority and will review the proposed intersection of a private and public street for compliance with District intersection policies and standards. b. Applicant Proposal: The applicant is proposing to access the site from Davis Lane, an existing private road. c. Staff Comments/Recommendations: Davis Lane is a private road with 24-feet of pavement. As it is today, Davis Lane does not meet ACHD standards for public streets. Even if Davis Lane were re-built to ACHD standards the District would still not accept it as a public roadway. This is due to the fact that the roadway would not serve a public benefit since it most likely will never be extended or stubbed to an adjacent property in the future. This is due to the Ridenbaugh Canal which wraps around the exterior boundary of the subdivision and Davis Lane. ACRD does not make any assurances that the private road, which is a part of this application, will be accepted as a public road if such a request is made in the future. Substantial redesign and reconstruction costs may be necessary in order to qualify this road for public ownership and maintenance. The following requirements must be met if the applicant wishes to dedicate the roadway to ACHD: • Dedicate a minimum of 50-feet of right-of-way for the road • Construct the roadway to the minimum ACRD requirements • Construct a stub street to the surrounding parcels 4. Tree Planters Tree Planter Policy: Tree Planter Policy: The District's Tree Planter Policy prohibits all trees in planters less than 8-feet in width without the installation of root barriers. Class II trees may be allowed in planters with a minimum width of 8-feet, and Class I and Class III trees may be allowed in planters with a minimum width of 10-feet. 5. Landscaping Landscaping Policy: A license agreement is required for all landscaping proposed within ACHD right-of-way or easement areas. Trees shall be located no closer than 10-feet from all public storm drain facilities. Landscaping should be designed to eliminate site obstructions in the vision triangle at intersections. District Policy 5104.3.1 requires a 40-foot vision triangle and a 3-foot height restriction on all landscaping located at an uncontrolled intersection and a 50- foot offset from stop signs. Landscape plans are required with the submittal of civil plans and must meet all District requirements prior to signature of the final plat and/or approval of the civil plans. D. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. Dedicate 56-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of S. Ten Mile Road abutting the parcel. The right-of-way purchase and sale agreement and deed must be completed and signed by the applicant prior to scheduling the final plat for signature by the ACHD Commission or prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The District will purchase the right-of-way which is in addition to existing right-of-way from available Corridor Preservation Funds. 5 Barletta Subdivision 2. Provide the District with a road trust in the amount of $2,100 (two-thousand one-hundred dollars) for the future construction of a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk. Sidewalk is to be built in conjunction with the S. Ten Mile Road street widening project. 3. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. E. Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the ACHD right-of-way. 2. Private sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within the ACHD right- of-way. 3. In accordance with District policy, 7203.6, the applicant may be required to update any existing non-compliant pedestrian improvements abutting the site to meet current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The applicant's engineer should provide documentation of ADA compliance to District Development Review staff for review. 4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 5. A license agreement and compliance with the District's Tree Planter policy is required for all landscaping proposed within ACRD right-of-way or easement areas. 6. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 7. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACRD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACRD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 8. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 9. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the ACHD Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Standards unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 10. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of ACHD prior to District approval for occupancy. 11. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of ACRD. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from ACHD. 12. If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACHD Planning Review will review the site plan and may require additional improvements to the transportation system at that time. Any change in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with ACHD Policy and Standard Conditions of Approval in place at that time unless awaiver/variance of the requirements or other legal relief is granted by the ACHD Commission. 6 Barletta Subdivision F. Conclusions of Law 1. The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are satisfied. 2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Attachments 1. Vicinity Map 2. Site Plan 3. Utility Coordinating Council 4. Development Process Checklist 5. Request for Reconsideration Guidelines 7 Barletta Subdivision Vicinity Map Site Plan Barletta Subdivision (PROPOSm soun+aroc~ sueo.) Ada County Utility Coordinating Council Developer/Local Improvement District Right of Way Improvements Guideline Request Purpose: To develop the necessary avenue for proper notification to utilities of local highway and road improvements, to help the utilities in budgeting and to clarify the already existing process. 1) Notification: Within five (5) working days upon notification of required right of way improvements by Highway entities, developers shall provide written notification to the affected utility owners and the Ada County Utility Coordinating Council (UCC). Notification shall include but not be limited to, project limits, scope of roadway improvements/project, anticipated construction dates, and any portions critical to the right of way improvements and coordination of utilities. 2) Plan Review: The developer shall provide the highway entities and all utility owners with preliminary project plans and schedule a plan review conference. Depending on the scale of utility improvements, a plan review conference may not be necessary, as determined by the utility owners. Conference notification shall also be sent to the UCC. During the review meeting the developer shall notify utilities of the status of right of way/easement acquisition necessary for their project. At the plan review conference each company shall have the right to appeal, adjust and/or negotiate with the developer on its own behalf. Each utility shall provide the developer with a letter of review indicating the costs and time required for relocation of its facilities. Said letter of review is to be provided within thirty calendar days after the date of the plan review conference. 3) Revisions: The developer is responsible to provide utilities with any revisions to preliminary plans. Utilities may request an updated plan review meeting if revisions are made in the preliminary plans which affect the utility relocation requirements. Utilities shall have thirty days after receiving the revisions to review and comment thereon. 4) Final Notification: The developer will provide highway entities, utility owners and the UCC with final notification of its intent to proceed with right of way improvements and include the anticipated date work will commence. This notification shall indicate that the work to be performed shall be pursuant to final approved plans by the highway entity. The developer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting prior to right of way improvements. Utility relocation activity shall be completed within the times established during the preconstruction meeting, unless otherwise agreed upon. Notification to the Ada County UCC can be sent to: 50 S. Cole Rd. Boise 83707, or Visit iducc.com for a-mail notification information. 9 Barletta Subdivision Development Process Checklist Items Completed to Date: ®Submit a development application to a City or to Ada County ®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD ®The ACHD Planning Review Section will receive the development application to review ®The Planning Review Section will do one of the following: ^Send a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific conditions of approval at this time. ®Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. ^Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. .,; .. ,>, ^For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" letter: • The applicant should submit one set of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development Review Section for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements required by ACHD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee assessment.) • The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the right-of-way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts. ^Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval. DID YOU REMEMBER: Construction (Non-Subdivisions) ^ Driveway or Property Approach(s) • Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to ACHD Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval. ^ Working in the ACHD Right-of-Way • Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit Application" to ACRD Construction -Permits along with: a) Traffic Control Plan b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt. Construction (Subdivisions) ^ Sediment 8~ Erosion Submittal • At least one week prior to setting up aPre-Construction Meeting an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plan, done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACRD Construction to be reviewed and approved by the ACHD Stormwater Section. ^ Idaho Power Company • Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being scheduled. ^ Final Approval from Development Services is required prior to scheduling aPre-Con. 10 Barletta Subdivision Request for Appeal of Staff Decision Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection. Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply and any modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at the hearing. 11 Barletta Subdivision ~a~a d71P~«kak ~v~gauow Dra~r~r 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-463-0092 Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 City of Meridian City Clerk's Office Jaycee Holman 33 E Broadway Avenue Ste 102 Meridian, ID 83642-2619 RE: AZ 10-002 & PP 10-002/Barletta Subdivision Dear Jaycee: Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has no objection on the above-referenced application for Annexation & Zoning. However Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District's Ridenbaugh Canal with an easement of one hundred and twenty feet (120'); sixty feet (60') either side of centerline lies on both the east and west side of this property Therefore a Land Use Change Application will be required. Sincerel/y,~ v John P. Anderson water Superintendent Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District JPA/dbg C: Office/File APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 17 August 2010 .. DISTRICT CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT Retum to: HEALTN Environmental Health Division ^Boise DEPARTMENT ^ Eagle Rezone # ~~, ~a -QQ Z ^ Garden City Meridian Conditional Use # una Preliminary /Final /Short Plat ~ C~ " 0° ~" ^ACZ 1.~+3~~TT~ Syd~t ~1S~o ^Star ~~ ^1. We have No Objections to this Proposal. ^2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ~3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ~4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ~5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water f,~j waste flow characteristics ,~-bedrock from original grade ^ other ~6. This office may require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. ^7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. ^8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ^ central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage ^ central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water ^9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality: ^ central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines ^ central water ~10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store ^14. Please see attached stormwater/~management recommendations 15. ~l~ ~1bS /p~ >r`cCei vr.~' arc csy~'cw ~~, Reviewed By: S Date r/~Z/~ Review Sheet 15726-001EH0904 Page 1 of 1 Machelle Hill ~~r'(~~-t'1T~ ~~~~ ,~~~-~ From: Larry Strough [Larry.Strough@itd.idaho.gov] Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 10:51 AM To: Machelle Hill Cc: Pam Golden Subject: AZ 10-002 & PP 10-002 Attachmen ts: img-X05105726-0001.pdf ITD has no comment on the enclosed notice. Thank You Larry Strough 334-8924 10/5/2010