The URL can be used to link to this page

Railside Subdivision PPWILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Plan to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public Worl:sBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 ROBERT D. CORRIE Maya GOUNGIL b!E6!BERS WALT W. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M.ROUNTREE GLENN R. BENTLEY P & Z COMMISSION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman TIM HEPPER JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND MALCOLM MACCOY TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning 8: Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: April 2. 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/18/96 HEARING DATE: 4/ x/96 REQUEST: Preliminary Plat for Railside Subdivision 9 BY: Ronald Yanke LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: South of Pine Road. West of Locust Grove Road JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MERIDIAP! SCHOOL DISTRICT MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) JIM SHEARER, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT GREG OSLUND, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH BOB CORRIE, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) -WALT MORROW, C/C U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) GLENN BENTLEY, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) WATER DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) SEWER DEPARTMENT CITY FILES BUILDING DEPARTMENT OTHER: FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER CITY ®F IKII~IA~ .ice ~rJ~u.~ Engineers Surveyors Planners Project: 11138 Date: March 15, 1996 LEGAL DESCRIPTION POR RAILSIDE INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION A parcel of land lying in the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Eoise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of the Southeast quarter (the East quarter correr!of Section 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 Eaet, Boise Meridian, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of tr•:s description; thence South 00°26'33" Weet 1221.06 feet (formerly known as South 00°26'x0" Wept 1227.x8 feet) along the East line of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter cf said Section 7 to a point on the Northerly right-of-way line of the Oregon Short Line Railroad; thence North 88°53'58" west 961.51 feet (formerly known ae North 88°37'27" West 861.63 feet) along said Northerly right-of-way line to a point; thence North O1°22'23" East 973.27 feet (formerly known as North O1°22'33" East 975.59 feet) to a point; thence North 89°33'35" East 160.27 feet (formerly known as North e9°33'52" East 160.24 feet) parallel with the North line of•the Ncrtheast quarter of the Southeast quarter =.. a point; thence North 00°26'45" west 225.01 feet (formerly known as North 00°26'08" west 225.00 feet) to a point on the North line of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter; thence North 89°33'47" East 688.97 feet (formerly known as North 89°33'52" East 688.97 feet) along the North line of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. Said parcel contains 22.84 acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO: All existing easements and road rights-of-way of record or appearing on the above-described parcel of land. Prepared by: GAL:cc P:\prajucce\11131\admin\railegal.doc MAR 15 '96 15 54 J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. 208 323 9336 PAGE.02 • REG~UEST F+~R SUBDIVISIClN APPROVAL q~'~1 ~4~ ~~ PRELIMINARY PLAT AND/OR FINAL PLAT PLANNIfJG A1~U 2UNING CUMMI55ION ~~~ ~~ TIME TABLE ~'i]R SUBMISSIO't: ~ A request far pr~elzrninary plat approval must be in the City Clerks passessiar, no later than three days following the regular meeting oz the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning a•r,d Zoning Commission, will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month the request was made. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:60 P. M.. Thursday follawing the Planning and Zoning Commission action,. GENERAL INFURMATIUN Railside Industrial Park 1. Name of Anne:~cation and Subdivision. SE 1/4, Section 7, T.3N, R.lE. 2. General Location, Ronald Yanke 3. Owners of record, ~e 4414 S. Gekeler Ln. ~ dip 83705relephone 342-8901 Addre~.,. P.O. Box 5405, Boise ID ~. Applicant, Same Address, Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. Firm J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 5. Engineer, Address 25o s. Beechwood, ,Zip 83709 Telephone 376-7~~?n Suite 201, Boise, ID 6. Name and address to receive City billings: Name Ronald Yanke Address 4414 S. Gekeler Ln. Telephone 342-8901 P.O. Box 5405, Boise, ID 83705 PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres~22.8Z 2. Number of lots 13 3. Lots per acre o _ s 7 ~. Density per acre N/A 5. Zoning Clas~if ication c s) iL ~ • 6. If the proposed sut~division is outside the Meridiar, City Limits but within the jurisdictionN.LA mile, wi,at is the existing zoning classification // 7. Uoes the plat border a potential green belt No 8. Have recreational easements been provided for No 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City No Explain 10. Are there proposed dedications of common areas? No Explain For future parks? No Explain 11. What school t s ) service the area Meridian , do you propose any agreements for future school sites rro Explain the industrial park will not generate students. 12. Other proposed amenities to the City Water Supply city Water Fire Department Meridian Other _ Irrigation ~ Explain Nampa-Meridian L:s. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial ur combination ) Industrial 14. Type of Dwelling(s) Single Family, Duplexes. Multiplexes, other Industrial 15. Proposed Development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot (s) . 46, o0o square feet b. Minimum square f ootage of structure (s ) N/A c. Are garages provides for. NSA square f ootage d. Are other coverings provided for No e. Landscaping has been provided for YES. Describe Landscaping will be constructed as required by Meridian Code. (2> ~ ~ f. Trees will be provided for YES. Trees will be maintained YES g. Sprinkler systems are provided for No. Variance .is requested. h. Are there multiple units NO Type remarks i. Are there special set back requirements rro Explain j. Has off street parking been provided for YES ,Explain Each lot is large enough to accomodate off street parking. k. Value range of property $50,000 - S14o,o0o per lot. 1. Type of financing for development Conventional m. Protective covenants were submitted .Date 16. Does the proposal land lock other property rro Does it create Enclaves rro STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be canstructed to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Uimen$ions will be determined by the City Engineer. A11 sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. ~. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Gamprehensive Plan. 3. Development will connect to City services. ~. Development rill comply with City Ordinances. 5. Preliminary Plat will include all appropriate easements. 6. Street names must not conflict with City grid system. (3) ~ ~ . ~JUJ J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. ENGINEERS•SURVEYORS•PLANNERS 250 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, ID 83709-0944 208/376-7330 FAX: 208/323-9336 To: Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Prepared by: Carl L. Stearns, Planning Associate J-U-B ENGINEERS RE: Railside Industrial Park Subdivision J-U-B FILE NO.: 11131 DATE: March 15, 1996 The applicant is seeking approval for Railside Industrial Park Subdivision. The subdivision consists of 13 lots between 1 and 1.5 acres in size. The 22.82 acre (gross) property is located south of Pine Road and west of Locust Grove Road and is described as a portion of the SE 1 /4, of Section 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Ada County, Idaho. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Mr. Ronald Yanke 4414 S. Gekeler Lane, P.O. Box 5405 Boise, ID 83705 Engineer: Gary Lee, P.E./L.S. J-U-B Engineers, Inc. 250 South Beechwood Avenue, Ste. 201 Boise, ID 83709-0944 376-7330 (Voice) 323-9336 (Fax) Intended Use for the Property: The applicant intends to develop a light industrial park soubdivision of 13 lots. Lots will be constructed and used for light industrial uses be each lot purchaser. • ~J~u Engineers Surveyors Planners Ownership and Size: Owners: Mr. Ronald Yanke and Ms. Linda Yanke, husband and wife. Gross: 22.82 Acres Net: 18.73 Acres ROW: 4.09 Acres Density: 0.52 Lots per Acre Existing Zoning of the Subject Property: Light Industrial (IL) Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: The zoning of the majority of surrounding properties is Light Industrial (IL) with the exception of the property to the north which is R-8 (see attached zoning map). This property is Maw's Addition and was developed for single-family residential construction. Adjacent land uses include light industrial, agricultural, and residential. Services: Roads: Fire Protection: Water: Waste-Water: Irrigation: School District: Pine Street to the north and Locust Grove to the east. Meridian Fire Protection District City of Meridian water City of Meridian sewer Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District Meridian School District Statement of Variance Request: The applicant is requesting a variance from the pressurized irrigation requirements of the City of Meridian. The proposed subdivision will be an industrial park, and therefore extensive area for landscaping is not expected. A 10 foot easement for landscaping is proposed for the north and east boundary of the property, however, this minimal amount of area does not necessitate a pressurized irrigation system. f~ ~~-u-B~ Engineers Surveyors Planners Statement of Development Features: Easements and right-of-ways are being provided for and dedicated for sewer, water, landscaping and roads. Respectfully Submitted, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. ~ ~~ . ~, _ Carl L. Stearns Planning Associate .. ~ r -_ T ~ ~• ~ _ ".."~ ~ s.. . '~ .. ~ ~ 3tiw a _ 1 .: r 7l ~., s .. t ~ --. ~''.~, ~ _ ; ~ ». _ ::- ~-: i.,. ' ' # t ~ .i,~; V, ~„ ~ is ~. ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~. r ' .. . ` -r ,_ r T r ~ ~ h a. h ~~ ~'~- . ~ r a r ~rRS~ n ~~ii _~~' • ~ ~ + 'T ~ r ~~ , ~~t -~~r ~i. f f i"' ~ ~ ..~ __.. ~ ~i1" ~.~ ~, .. ~-. R-8 ~ . r o ` , `~ - C-G _ -G ~ -G p C" v ~ 1 y 1 _g } _ ~, - - ~,~ E t '~ J I-L = ~ x ~i~. r ~ - I-L ~ ~~ ,~,~.~ ~ - ~._ o - '~ I .._ _. l - - I- ~ I-L '~, ... C-G I ~ -} M C 1 ~ 5 > ~ ,- -, \ ., ' ,. r ~J J J ~ 'J .. ~~ ~ ~ I ' . THIS FORM FURNISHED COURTESY OF: ~ J ~ J ` ~'. .. ., ~ ~ i ..... , i 30t~c '.~ ALLIANCE TITLE & ESCROW CORP. '~~ DES 2i P('1 , QU rLE _.._. READ Qc APPROVED BY GRANTEE(S): fl E C 0 i, L :i u .. ; gi n i. _ '~ E S T F SPACE ABOVE THIS LQJE FOR RECORDWO DATA 7210} Order No.: 95057417 KS WARRANTY DEED FOR VALUE RECEIVED BEDELCO, INC., an Idaho corporation GRANTOR(S), does(do) here~~by//~RANT, BARGAIN, SELL and CONVEY unto~RONALD C . YANKE and LINDA L. YANKEI/huaband and wife GRANTEE(S), whose current address is: PO BOX 5405, BOISE, ID 83705 the following described real property in ADA County, State of Idaho, more particularly described as follows, to wit: Aa set forth on the attached EXHIBIT "A", which by this reference becomes a parr. hereof. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, with their appurtenances unto the said Grantee(s), and Grantee(s) heirs and assigns forever. And the said Grantor(s) does(do) hereby covenant to and with the said Grantee(s), that Grantor(s) is/are the owner(s) in fee simple of said premises; that said premises are free from all encumbrances, EXCEPT those to which this conveyance is expressly made subject and those made, suffered or done by the Grantee(s); and subject to reservations, restrictions, dedications, easements, rights of way and agreements, (if any) of record, and general taxes and assessments, (including irrigation and utility assessments, if any) for the current year, which are not yet due and payable, and that Grantor(s) will warrrant and defend the same from all lawful claims whatsoever. Dated: December 15, 1995 BEDELCO, INC., an Idaho corporation By: n Smith, President By: :" L. Bewa, Secretary 5~~~' P` P' C. !~ " `~?.? , J ~ ~~~„ ~ t, ~.~` i _~ -~ r'., i1 J -',J~~ M ~ ~ STATE OF IDAHO, COUNTY OF ADA, ss. On this ~ day of December in the year 1995, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State personally appeared W. Burton Smith and E.L. Bews known to me to be the President and Secretary, respectively of the corporation that executed this instrument and the person who executed the instrument on behalf of said corporation, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal and year in this certificate first above written. ' Signature: Name : A ~ • ~ .10.x/ . (Type pr_ Print) Residing At: ~(1~~, My Commission expires: ,,_Q N~~~a~~~~~~, * •. .~ •'t v ~y$ . _ s• . ~ c_e ,~ ,{(,o :.f `-v i ..• ~\,. ..5, . QRDER NO. 9505741' ; • '` ~ EXHIBIT "A" A parcel of land lying in ttie Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter (the East Quarter corner) of Section 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence South 00 degrees 26'40" West 1227.48 feet along the Eaet line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 7 to a point on the Northerly right of way line of the Oregon Short Line Railroad; thence North 88 degrees 37'27" West 861.63 feet along said Northerly right of way line to a point; thence North O1 degrees 22'33" East 975.59 feet to a point; thence North 89 degrees 33'52" East 160.24 feet parallel with the North line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter to a point; thence North 00 degrees 26'08" West 225.00 feet to a point on the North line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 33'52" East 688.97 feet along the North line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. J Q ~~ ~ t/) ~Z Z ~ W ~ ~S J ~ m Q ~ ~~ _ i i ~ ~ / _ Q 6 I ' ~ ~+ " I ~ n ^ ~~ [~ w e S J ~ _ ' ` i t O O t0 ell ~ ~~ J Q U N - s r ; •, :~ ~r~~ #~~~. _ 9. ~ee ~r / .~ I I ~ ~1! / i 1 I _~^.jE ' I I - - - - -tl..~tt _ _ ~ -~ 'fem. _ .. v ?603 G09Z ' N ~6'It}- 1[ ~', e ~ o ~___~_-+r_______ ._.. ~BQi Y kII' - 1 ps ____ _....._____....' 7 E sw __-_ f ~ _ L '~ t y ~ ' i l i ^r ~ i I' .i Q c .. • ~. I ~7 I ( . ~ _______l_+____ ~L92. ~6 ___ __ ~,^J:. 0 .~,.., a ;;r V ~ r r r . Z 1~ i ~ t°`~IFtfy~1E ~lumi ..._ .. - ~.~.... .~ ,, . ~ - I y' r i v anerw~++ 7 \ ~ _____ _ ___I . ---- -1----= ~ I ~ ____ar____ ____~___ 10alOT _ ~~ _ _ _ _ _ I. W 1t2f.06 -~-~~~ -~~~ yL 9 Q ~~ .~ :g~~ a a~~ Q. Z~~ ~0;0~ Opr ~S~ SIN 9Y9Y ~'" g~ fig. `~. ~~~ {j 2 --- ~x i I II!~i 1E°e~~° ~~~~ E [~` 1~~3s~~~~~s~ .~ ER ~€ €~t ~f~ ~~~'~~ f OQ ~~ i 3~ t r~ ~ T r~ r ~q ~~ -[ ~ f ~ i tt ~~ ` [ 1 t i ~ ~ ~ raj ~ :f~ ttt `~ I is ' ~~ ~R ~~=Qa~° ~ g£ ~ • 1 t ~ ~ i~ ` ~i ~ rt ~ x~ a .~ ~e ~~E t t {~ ~ j ; ~ g j !~ i ~~ 7 1 [ ~ 1 ~ [ ~ ~¢ a ~~ n ~ • s ; is' • ~ -. 4 ~ iz yp v a 9T [u [ orb .,. .. e..%~.u~~n. - ~ RAILSIDE INDUSTRIAL SUBD -_-•-__-- J•U-B ENGINEERS, Ina ' ~1 ~ ~ T: ~ ~~ ;~ -ae -_ f69 90YIM NLCMw090 .KW[ [ .-.S V.; AO uzi~ a ~- -- -- ------- ~ - ......... PRELIMINARY PLAT U16.-a.. 99R[. p.wo I i i .. ru fa-»f-wea ........ r 03/15/96 16:53 $`208 323 9336 ,l r~~u ~= Engineers Sur~cyors Planners Project: 11138 Date: March 15, 1996 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR RAILSIDE INDUSTRIAL P.a,RK SUBDIVISION fL7.10 0 A parcel of land lying in the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described ae follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of the Southeast quarter (the East quarter corner)of Section 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence South 00°26'33" West 1221.06 feet (formerly known as Sot:th 00°26'40" Wept 1227.49 feet) along the East line of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said SEaLlon 7 to a point on the Northerly right-of-way line of the Oregon Short Line Railroad; thence North 88°53'58" west 961.51 feet (formerly known ae North 88°37'27" west 861.63 feet) along said Northerly right-of-way line to a point; thence North 01°2Z'23" East 973.27 feet (formerly known as North O1°22'33" East 975.59 feet) to a point; thence North 89°33'35" East 160.27 feet (formerly known as North 89°33'52" East 160.24 feet) parallel with the North line of the Northeast quarter of the 5outheaet quarter to a point; thence North 00°26'45" West 225.01 feet (formerly known as Nor;.h 00°26'08" west 225.00 feet) to a point on the North line of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter; thence North 89°33'47" East 688.97 feet (formerly known as North B9°33'52" East 688.9 feet) along the North line of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter to the REAL POIN2 OF BEGINNING of this description. Said parcel contains 22.84 acres, more or less. SUBJECT 2'0: All existing easements and road rights-of-way of record or appearing on the above-described parcel of land. Prepared by: J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. GAL:cc P:\projecCS\11131\admin\raiJ.egai.doc Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. J-Li-B ENG. BOISE MAR 15 '96 15 54 205 323 9336 PAGE.02 x • PFMR02PLFB 96 N E W y1 A S T E R t1 P D .A T E STEWART 3/14%96 Parcel 51107417212 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name YANKE RONALD C' & LINDA L 010 22.929 Uata From Master Buyer Bank Code C,jO Lien Code Address PO BOX 5405 Prepaid L.I.D. BOISE ID Bankrupt 83705 - 0000 Sub.Code Anexation Last Change : 96/U2/09 By ASR_DIXIE From: Total Entity Legal PAR #7212 OF NE4SE4 SEC_' 7 3N 1E Exemption #417210-5 ;`-95093709 Grp OOU Typ 000 Ap M3N1E0077212 3N 1E 07 Hardship Property Zoning I-L Flag Address 01125 E PINE AVE MERIDIAN ID 836 42-0000 D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMARY Ucc. 0 NON-OCC Action: F2=Select. F3=Exit. F10-Tax PFrIR02PttB 96 N E W M A S T E R U P D A T E STEW ART 3,`14/96 Parcel 51107417815 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE. Name BEDELCU INC 010 16.071 Data From Master Buyex• Bank Code ~~ ~~~ Lien Code Address 9530 HALSTEAD DR Prepaid L.I,D. BOISE ID Bankrupt 83704 - 0000 Sub.Code Anexation Last Change 96/02/09 By ASR_DIXIE From: Total Entity Legal PAR #7815 OF NE4SE4 SEC 7 3N 1E Exemption #417210-B Grp U00 Typ 000 Ap M3N1E0077815 3N lE 07 Hardship Property Zoning I-L Flay Address 01125 E PINE AVE MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMARY Or_.c. 0 NUN-OCC Action: F2=Select. F3=Exit. F10=Tax • PFMR02PI1B 96 N E W M A S T E R U P D A T E STEWA RT 3/14(96 Parcel 51107417300 Code r'lrea 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name CULLINS RICHARD H & FRANCES E 200 .880 27900 Data From 410 98300 Master Buyer 990 4915U- Bank c"ode US1 C/O Address 1125 E PINE AVE MERIDIAN ID 83642 - 0()00 Last. Change : 95110/25 By ASR_JAMIS Total 77050 Legal PAR #7300 OF NE4SE4 SEC 7 :3N 1E #9223317 e;rp 000 Typ 000 Ap Lien Code Prepaid L.I.D. Bankrupt Sub . code Anexatior~ From: Entity Exempt ion M3N1E0077300 3N lE 07 Hardship Property Zoning I-L Flag Address 01125 E PINE AVE MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMARY Occ. 0 ':VON-OCC Action: F2=Select. F3=Exit. F10-Tax PF'TMiR02PtiiB 96 N E W M A S T E R U P D A T E- STEWART 3114/96 Parcel 81724180010 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name PALMER TRUY & TAWNEE 2U0 .210 17000 Uat.s From 410 49500 Master Buyer 990 Bank ~~'ode GEM C/O Address 1040 E PINE ST MERIDIAN ID 83642 - 0000 Last Change 95/07,•'21 By ASR ALLEN Lega 1 LOT 1 BLIi 1 DANBtiRY FAIR SLiB NO 1 #95022313 Total 6650U Grp 000 Typ 000 Ap Lien Code Prepaid L.I.D. Bankrupt Sub.Code Anexation From: Entity Exemption M26410010010 3N 1E 07 Hardsl--ip Property Zoning R-8 Flag Address 01040 E PINE AVE MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMARY Occ. 0 ~tON-OCC Action: F2=Select. F3=Exit F10-Tax • • PFMR02PUB 96 V E W M A S T E R U P D A T E STEWART 3/14f96 Parcel 82039261200 Code Area 210 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name FARRINGTON OPAL C TRUST 150 3.700 25900 Data From FARRINGTON OPAL C TRLISTEE 370 44600 Master Bui°er c/u Address 1180 EAST PINE MERIDIAN ID 83642 - 0000 Last. Change 91./11/12 By ASR HOWARD Legal LOT 5 EXC E 120` OF S 363' EAST SIDE ADD MERIDIAN #9159821 00569000005A Property Address 01130 E PINE Type 1 REAL F2=Select. F3=Exit. Total 70500 Grp 000 Typ 000 Ap 3N 1E 07 Hardship Zoning Rl ID Roll 1 PRIMARY Oc.r_.. 0 NUN-OCC F10=Tax Bank Code Lien Code Prepaid L.I.D. Bankrupt Sub.Code Anexation From: Entity Exempt ior~ Flaq D.D. Action: PFMR02PUB 96 N E W M A S T E R U P D A T E STEWART 3/14,`'96 Parcel 82039261300 Code Area 21C) Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name FARRINGTON OPAL C TRUST 150 1.000 30000 Data From FARRINGTON OPAL C TRUSTEE 370 92700 Master Buyer 990 46350- Bank Code C/O Address 1180 E FINE MERIDIAN ID 83642 - 0000 Last. Change 94/07/20 By ASK_DIXIE Total 76350 Legal E 120' OF S 363' OF LOT 5 EAST SIDE ADD MERIDIAN #9159820 Grp 000 Typ U00 Ap Lien Code Prepaid L.I.D. Bankrupt. Sub.Code Anexation From: Entity Exemption 005690000058 3N 1E 07 Hardship Property Zoning R1 Flag Address 01180 E PINE AVE MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMAF'tY Ucc. 0 NUN-OCC Ar_tion: F2=Select F3=Exit F10=Tax • PFNIRO 2PL'B 96 N E WM A S T E R L1 P D A T E STEWA RT 3 14/96 Parcel 82039260754 Code Area 03 Type Qt.y Value ACTIVE Name GREGORY :STEVEN G 200 .400 25900 Data From 410 66900 Master Buyer SCRIVNER RIAHCARD N & MARY C 990 33450- Bank Code t~T,M C/O Address 6161 N WILLOWDALE PLACE BOISE ID 83?14 - 0000 Last. Change : 95%02/13 By ASk OTT Legal PAR #0754 OF LOT 3 EAST SIDE ADD MERIDIAN #0750-B Total Lien Code Prepaid L.I.D. Bankrupt Sub.Code Anexation From: 59350 Entity Exemption Grp 000 Typ OOU Ap M0569000003B 3N lE 07 Hardship PropeY-ty Zoning R-f) Flag Address 01210 E PINE AVE MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMARY Occ. 0 NON-OCC Action: F2=Select. F3=Exit F10=Tax PFMR02Pt1B 96 N E W M A S T E R L1 F D A T E STEWART 3;'14/96 Parcel 82039260726 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name MAWS LTD PARTNERSHIP 150 1.800 27000 Data From Buyer C/O Address 6161 N WILLOWDALE BOISE ID 83714 - 0000 Last Change 95/02/13 By ASR_OTT Total 27000 Legal PAR #0726 OF LOT 3 EAST SIDE ADD MERIDIAN #0725-B Grp 000 Typ 000 Ap 005690000038 3N 1E 07 Hardship Property Zoning R-8 Address 00000 E PINE AVE MERIDIAN ID Type 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMARY Oc~c. 0 NUN-OCC F2=Select. F3~Exit F10=Tax Master Bank Code Lien Code Prepaid L.I.D. Bankrupt Sub.Code Anexation From: Entity Exemption Flay D.D. Action: • PF~iR02PZiB 96 N E W M A S T E R G P D A T E STEWART 31`14!96 Parr_el 85512710010 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name I-IICHALSCHECK DEAN E & SANDRA h) x'00 .190 17000 Data From 410 64600 Master Buyer Bank Cade BPS C/U Lien Code MFH Address 1350 E PINE AV"E FrePaid L.I.D. MERIDIAN ID Bankrupt. 53642 - 0000 Sub.Code J4 Anexation Last. Change : 94/04/29 By ASR2_ALLEN From: Total 81600 Entity Leda I LOT 1 BLI 1 ?~1AWS ADD #2 #94035446 Exemption Grp OOU Typ OOU Ap M27520010010 3N 1E 07 Hardship Property Zoning R-$ Flag Address 01350 E PINE AVE MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 D.D. 'T'ype 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMARY t)cc_~. U NUN-UCC Ar_.tion: F2=Select. F3=Exit F10=Tax PFMRU2PUB 96 N E W M A S T E R U P D A T E STEWART 3;14/96 Parr_el 85512710020 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name CZARNECKI CHERYL A 200 .160 16500 Data From 410 60300 Master Buyer 990 301:50- Bank C_'ode PMI C/~~ Lien Code MFH Address 907 N RALSTIN PL Prepaid L.I.D. MERIDIAN ID Bankrupt 53642 - UQ00 Sub.Code E4 Anexation Last Change 94/04/13 By ASR_LAZEN From: Total 46650 Entity Legal LOT 2 BLK 1 MAWS ADD #1 Exemption #94013875 tarp OUO Typ OOU Ap M27520010020 3N 1E 07 Hardship Property Zoning R-8 Flaq Address 00907 N RALSTIN PL MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 FRIMARY t~cr_. 0 NUN-Ot"C Action: F2=Select F3=Exit. F10=Tax i • FFMRf)2PtIB 96 N E W NI A S T E R C P D ?1 T E STEWART 3/14/96 Parcel 85512710030 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name PURDY MICHAEL A 200 .i40 16500 Data From 410 77600 Master Buyer 990 3$800- Bank Code SSC C/O Lien Code MFH Address 931 N RALSTIN PL Prepaid L.I.D. MERIDIAN ID Bankrupt 83 642 - 0000 Sub.Code Anexation Last Change 93/08/19 By ASR_MOUSER From: Total 55300 Entity Legal LOT 3 BLK 1. 1~TAWS ADD #1 Exemption #9361575 Grp 000 Typ 000 Ap M27520010030 3N 1E U7 Hardship Property Zoning R-8 Flag Address 00931 N RALSTIN PL MERIDIAN ID 8364 2-0000 D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMARY Ocr_. 0 NON-OCC Ar_.tion: F2=Select F3=Exit. F10-Tax PFNIR02PUB 96 N E W M A S T E R C' P R A T E STEWA RT 3/14/96 Parcel 85512710040 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE name WAGEMAN CLINTON I 200 .220 17500 Data From 410 86700 Master Bud=er 990 43350- Bank Code NUR C/~~ Lien Code MFH Address 953 N RALSTIN PL Prepaid L.I.D. MERIDIAN ID Bankrupt 83642 - 0000 Sub.Code Anexation Last. Change 94/01/24 By ASR_RICHMN From: Total 60850 Entity Lega 1 LOT 4 BI,K 1 ~'IAWS ADD #1 Exempt ion #93110522 Grp 000 Typ 000 Ap M27520010040 3N 1E 07 Hardship Property Zoning R-8 Flag Address 00953 N RALSTIN PL MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 FRIMARY Ocr_.. 0 NON-UCC Action: F2=Seler_t F3=Exiit F10-Tax • i PFMR02PtIB 96 N E W M A S T E R Q P D A T E STEWART 3/14/96 Parr_el 85512710050 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name MITCHELL RICHARD M 200 .180 17000 Data From 410 85800 Master Buyer c}90 42900- Bank Code HFS C/O Lien Code MFH Address 975 N RALSTIN PL Prepaid L.I.D. MERIDIAN ID Bankrupt (;3642 - 0000 Sub.Code Anexatior- Last. Change 93/09/13 By ASR_MOUSER From: Total 59900 Entity Legal LOT 5 BLK 1 MAWS ADD #1 Exemption #9371477 t;rp 000 Typ 000 Ap M27520010050 3N lE 07 Hardship Property Zoning R-8 L'lay Address 00975 N RALSTIN PL MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 D.D. T~Tpe 1 REAL Rol l I PRIMARY t7r_.c . 0 NON-OCC Action: F2=Select F3=Exit F10=Tax PFMR02PtIB 96 N E W M A S T E R LI F D A T E STEWART 3i 14!96 Parcel 85512710060 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name MEATTE NICKIE D 200 .240 27500 Data From 410 69800 Master Buyer Bank Code CHA C/O Lien Code MFf3 Address 13043 S FIVE MILE RD Prepaid KUNA L.I.D. ID Bankrupt 83634 - 2663 Sub.Code Anexation Last. Change 95/06/01 By ASR_RICH From: Total 87300 Entity Legal LOT 6 BLK 1 MAWS ADD #1 Exemption #9397919 t;rp 000 Typ OOU Ap M27520010060 3N lE 07 Hardship Property Zoning R-8 Fla 9 Address 00989 N RALSTIN PL MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 D.D. ~'ype 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMARY Occ, 0 NON-OCC Action: F2=Select F3=Exit. F10=Tax • PFN1R02PUB 96 N E W M A S T E R U P D A T E STEWART 3•'14/96 Parcel 85512710080 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name PALMER LISA J 200 .200 17000 Data From 410 79200 Master Buyer 990 39600- Bank code FTB C/O Lien Code MFH Address 994 N RALSTIN PL Prepaid L.I.D. MERIDIAN ID Bankrupt $3 642 - O00U Sub.Code Anexation Last. Change 94/08/05 By ASR2_ALLEN From: Total 56600 Entity Legal LOT 8 BLK 1 MAWS ADD #1 Exemption #94069133 Grp 000 Typ 000 Ap M27520010080 3N 1E 07 Hardship Property Zoning R-8 Flag Address 00994 N RALSTIN PL MERIDIAN ID 8364 2-0000 D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMARY Occ. 0 NON-OCC Ar_tion: F2=Select. F3=Exit F1 0=Tax PFAIR02Pi:+B 96 N E W M A S T E R U P D A T E STEWART 31''14196 Parcel 85512710090 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name t~LSUN CHERIE R ?00 .210 17000 Data From 410 83800 Master Buyer 990 41900- Bank Code SUM c/O Address 951 N SCRIVNER WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642 - 0000 Last. Change 93/08/12 By ASR_MOUSEK Total 58900 Legal LOT 9 BLK 1 MAWS ADD #1 ,9334079 Grp 000 Typ 000 Ap Lien Code MFH Prepaid L.I.D. Bankrupt Sub.Code Anexation From: Entity Exemption M27520010090 3N lE 07 Hardship Property Zoning R-8 Flag Address 00951 N SCRIVNER WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMARY Or_•C. 0 NON-OCC Action: F2=Select. F3=Exit F10-Tax • PFMR02PL'B 96 N E W M A S T E R LT P D A T E STEWART 3 14/96 Parcel 85512710100 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name ~1ICKERSON LANCE CURTIS & 200 .1.70 17000 Data From CAROL TERESA 410 79600 Master Buyer 990 39800- Bank Code MEL C/O Address 973 N SCRIVNER WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642 - 0000 Last. Change : 93/10/06 By ASR MOtISER Lego 1 LOT 10 BLIi 1 MACas ADD #1 #9379441 Lien Code MFH Prepaid L.I.D. Bankrupt Sub.Code Anexation From: Total 56800 Entity Exemption Grp 000 Typ 000 Ap M27520010100 3N 1E 07 Hardship Property Zoning R-8 Flag Address 00973 N SCRIVNER WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642-000() D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMARY Ucc. 0 NON-OCC Action: F2=Select. F3=Exit F10=Tax PFMR02PL1B 96 N E W M A S T E R U P D A T E STEWART 3/14!96 Parcel 85512710180 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name OLSUN BARBARA J 200 .160 17000 Data From 410 82600 Master Buyer 990 41300- Bank Code NUR C/O Address 988 N SCRIVNER WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642 - 0000 Last. Change 96/01/10 By ASR CHADWL Legal LOT 6 BLK 2 14IAWS ADD #1 #95081505 Lien Code Prepaid L.I.D. Bankrupt Sub.Code Anexation From: Total 5$300 Entity Exemption Grp 000 Typ 000 Ap M27520020060 3:~ 1E 07 Hardship Property Zoning R-8 Flag Address 00988 N SCRIVNER WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 FRIMARY Occ. 0 NUN-OCC Action: F2=Select F3=Exit F10=Tax • • PFMR02PIB 96 N E W M A S T E R U P D A T E STEWART 3/14/96 Parcel 85512710170 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name VANDECOEVERING JAMES P & 200 .160 17000 Data From BRENDA L 410 80600 Master Buyer 990 Bank Code NOR C/O Address 96f) N SCRIVNER WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642 - 0000 Last. Change 95/05/09 By ASR MOUSER Total 97600 Legal LOT 5 BLK 2 1~9AWS ADD #1 #95020933 carp 000 Typ 000 Ap Lien Code Prepaid L.I.D. Bankrupt Sub.Code Anexation From: Entity Exemption M27520020050 3N 1E 07 Hardship Property Zoning R-8 Flag Address 00960 N SCRIVNER WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMARY Occ. 0 NON-OCC Action: F2=Select F3=Exit. F10=Tax PFr9R02PUB 96 N E W M A S T E R L P D A T E STEWA RT 3114196 Parcel 85512710160 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name BAILEY KEVIN DAVID & BARBARA J 200 .290 17500 Data From 410 85800 Master Buyer 990 42900- Bank Code NBK C / CJ Address 946 N SCRIVNER WAY MERIDIAN ID (33642 - 0000 Last. Change 94/06/30 By ASR MOUSER Total 60400 Legal LOT 4 BLK 2 MAWS ADD #1 #94035896 carp 000 Typ 000 Ap Lien Cvde MFH Prepaid L.I.D. Bankrupt Sub.Code J4 Anexation From: Entity Exemption M27520020040 3N 1E 07 Hardship Property Zoning R-8 Flag Address 00946 N SCRIVNER WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642-0000 D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMARY Ocr_. 0 NON-OCC Action: F2=Select F3=Exit. F10=Tax • PFMR02FUB 96 N E W M A S T E R U P D A T E STEWART 3/14/96 Parcel R551271C)150 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name BANKS SHELEEN 200 .180 17000 Data From 410 59100 Master Buyer 990 29550- Bank Code SSC C /~~ Address 938 N SCRIVNER WAY Lien Code MFH Prepaid L.I.D. MERIDIAN ID Bankrupt 83 642 - OU00 Sub.Code E4 Last. Change 94/04/05 By ASR_LAZEN Anexation From: Total 46550 Entity Legal LOT 3 BLK 2 MAWS ADD #.1 Exemption #94022586 #94023491 carp 000 Typ 000 Ap M2752002003t) 3N lE 07 Hardship Property Zoning R-8 Flag Address 00938 N SCRIVNER WAY MERIDIAN ID 8364 2-0000 D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMARY Occ. 0 NON-OCC Action: F2=Select. F3=Exit F1 0=Tax PF1~iR02PUB 96 N E W M A S T E R L P D A T E STEWA RT 3,•'14196 Parcel 85512710140 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name SCARPELLA JEFF L 200 .160 17000 Data From 410 65900 Master Buyer 990 32950- Bank Cade FMC C/~~ Address 922 N SCRIVNER WAY Lien Code MFH Prepaid L.I.D. MERIDIAN ID Bankrupt 83642 - 0000 Sub.Code Last Change 95/04/18 By ASR_MOUSER Anexation From: Total 49950 Entity Legal LOT 2 BLR 2 MAWS ADD #1 Exemption #9384185 t;rp 000 Typ 0 00 Ap M27520020020 3N 1E 07 Hardship Property Zoning R-8 Flag Address 00922 N SCRIVNER WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642-000() D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMARY Occ. 0 NON-OCC Action: F2=Select F3-Exit F10=Tax • PFI~`IR02PL'B ~iG N E W M A S T E R U P D A T E STEWART .3/14196 Parcel 85512710130 Code Area 03 TY1~e Qty Value ACTIVE Name BOOTH JEFF MARTIN & 200 .180 17000 Data From ELIZABETH ANN 410 76000 Master Buyer 990 38000- Bank Code FMC C/O Lien Code MFH Address 910 ~t SCRIVNER WAY Prepaid L.I.D. MERIDIAN ID Bankrupt 83642 - 0000 Sub.Code Anexation Last. Change 93/05/25 By ASR_WEAVER From: Total 55000 Entity Legal LOT 1 BLK 2 TM1AWS ADD #1 Exemption #9320713 GT-p 000 Typ 000 Ap M27520020010 3N 1E 07 Hardship Property Zoning R-8 Flag Address 00910 N SCRIVNER WAY MERIDIAN ID 8364 2-0000 D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMARY Ucc. 0 NUN-OCC Action: F2=Select F3=Exit F10=Tax PFMR02PUB 96 N E W M A S T E R U P D A T E STEWART 3114/96 Parcel 51108233800 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name NEWBERRY ENTERPRISES 140 4.880 122000 Data From 360 597500 Master Buyer Bank Code C!O HI-MICRU TOOL CORP Lien Code Address 1410 E PINE ST Prepaid L.I.D. MERIDIAN ID Bankrupt 83642 - 5938 Sub.Code Anexation Last. Change : 88/OF,/10 By ASR_CHILDE From: Total 719500 Entity Legal PAR #3800 OF SW4NW4 SEC 8 3N 1E Exemption #8447798 Grp 000 Typ 000 Ap NI3N1E0083800 3N lE 08 Hardship Property Zoning I-L Flag Address 01410 E PINE ID D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 PR IMARY Occ. U NUN-OCC Action: F2=Select. F3=Exit F10=Tax • . PFMR02PUB 96 N E W M A S T E R U P D A T E STEW ART 3/14/9b Parcel 5110$325404 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name ANDERSON LUMBER COMPANY 010 7.730 6184 Data From Buyer Master C/O Bank Code Address 4700 S HARFtISON BLVD Lien Code Prepaid L.I.D. OGDEN UT Bankrupt 84409 - 0000 Sub.Code Last. Change 95/09/26 By ASR_DIXIE Anexation From: Legal PAR #5404 OF NW4SW4 Total 6184 Entity SEC 8 3N 1E Exemption #325400-5 #95001258 Grp 000 Typ 000 Ap M3N1E0085404 3N lE 08 Hardship Property Zor~ing I-L Flag Address 00000 E PINE AVE MERIDIAN ID D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 FRIMARY Occ. 0 NUN-OCC Action: F2=Select. F3=Exit F10=Tax PFMR02PL1B 96 N E W M A S T E R tt F D A T E STEWART 3; 14/96 Parcel 51108325402 Code Area 03 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name YANKE/TRICON L L C 010 10.770 8616 Data From Buyer Master C/t) Bank Code Address PO BoX 5405 Lien Code Prepaid BOISE ID L.I.D. Bankrupt 83705 - OOOU Sub.Code Last. Change 95/09/26 By ASR_DIXIE Anexation From: Total 8616 Entity Legal PAR #5402 OF NW4SW4 SEC. 8 3N 1E Exemption #325400-B Grp 000 Typ 000 Ap M3N1E0085402 3N 1E 08 Hardship Property Zoning I-L Flay Address 00000 E PINE AVE MERIDIAN ID D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMARY Occ. 0 NUN-OCC Action: F2=Select. F3=Exit. F10=Tax i PFMRU2PUB 96 N E W M A S T E R U P D A T E STEWART 3%14%9E Parcel S11u74~911U Code Area U3 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name BUILDERS MARKETPLACE INC 17U 2U.53t1 3u79uU Data From 39(1 1113ttUU Master Buyer C%O Address 131)u E FRANKLIN MERIDIAN ID 83641 - UUUl1 Last Change 95%u3%14 By ASR OTT Legal PAR #9110 OF S1SE4 SEC 7 3N 1E #4491Uu-4491UU-439u1)U-C Bank Code Lien Code Prepaid L.I.D. Bankrupt Sub.Code Anexation From: Total 142171)u Entity Exemption Grp U (1 l1 Typ U U lJ Ap M3N1Et1U7911U 3N 1E U7 Hardship Property Zoning I-L Flag Address U1311U E FRANKLIN RD MERIDIAN ID 83641-(1(1(1(1 D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMARY Ocr_. U NON-OCC Action: Fl=Select F3=Exit F1U-Tax PFMRUIPUB 9b N E W M A S T E R U P D A T E STEWART 3%14%9Ei Parcel S11i17449999 Code Area 141 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name MADDEN FAMILY TRUST 1110 1£t.1t3U 114(17 Data From MADDEN RALPH & NOLA TRUSTEES 1911 .5UU Master Buyer C/O Address 1Ei1U E FRANKLIN RD MERIDIAN ID 83(141 - UUU(J Last Change 91%1U%07 By ASR1 FAUCE Legal E1SE4SE4 EXC R%W SEC 7 3N 1E #9148768 Bank Code Lien Code Prepaid L.I.D. Bankrupt Sub.Code Anexation From: Total 114(17 Entity Exemption Grp UUU Typ UUU Ap U3NU1EU79999 3N 1E t17 Hardship Property Zoning RT Flag Address U161(1 E FRANKLIN RD MERIDIAN ID 83641-(lU(1U D.D. Type 1 REAL Roll 1 PRIMARY Occ. U NON-OCC Action: F1=Select F3=Exit F1U-Tax • PFMRU2PUB yki N E W M A S T E R U P D A T E STEWART 3%14%9E Parcel S11u8336UCi0 Code Area 142 Type Qty Value ACTIVE Name MADDEN FAMILY TRUST Ull) 17.5ut1 13y33 Data From MADDEN RALPH & NOLA TRUSTEES lUU .5()U 165UU Master Buyer 1yU l.Ei5u Bank Code C%O 31u 6111011 Lien Code Address 16211 E FRANKLIN 310 4100 Prepaid 9yU 30100- L.I.D. MERIDIAN ID Bankrupt t33Ei42 - UUUU Sub.Code Anexation Last Change 94i1u/17 By ASR_OTT From: Total 7473:1 Entity Legal W2SW4SW4 EXC.R%W SEC $ 3N 1E Exemption yl4ti 71iti U3NUlEUf36UUU Property Address U162U E FRANKLIN Type 1 REAL F2=Select F3=Exit Grp U U U Typ U 110 Ap 3N lE U$ Hardship Zoning RT Flag RD MERIDIAN ID tt3642-U(lQll D.D. Roll 1 PRIMARY Occ. l1 NON-OCC Action: FlU=Tax ~ ~ Meridian City Council May 7, 1996 Page 57 don't have the capability of doing that. If we don't then we need to acquire that capability so that staff knows what has to happen, the applicant at the point of making the application and going through the process understands what has to happen before they can start up. So I think that if we don't have any of those things in place right now that we need to adjust our procedure so that they are all in place so everybody has a fair chance of knowing what is expected of them. Smith: Thank you Morrow: So I guess to finish.the thought out is that we can have Wayne and Will research if we have that capability now or let's find out what it is we have got. Then we implement the procedure. If we need to modify it then we will cover it at a strategic planning session and get it committed by ordinance or whatever it takes to get it done. Crookston: It would created as of the Council action, people have 30 days to file an appeal, but the approval would be effective as of the date that the conditional use was granted unless we put in there that it is granted upon the issuance of a letter from either the City Clerk or the Planning & Administrator. Morrow: Well I think it makes certain sense to, if you. grant somebody the opportunity to press ahead with something than an appeal comes through. Then what do you do tell them to stop? Crookston: Yes, if that is part of it, but it is granted unless an appeal is filed of the granting or if it is denied an appeal is filed because of the denial. Morrow: Well that is something that we can deal with at a later time. ITEM #14: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR RAILSIDE SUBDIVISION BY RON YANKE: Corrie: I will open the public hearing and invite the representative from Railside Subdivision. Morrow: Before we press on with this hearing, I do want to ask the Council, I am a titled owner of a parcel that was bought in Layne Industrial Park which was also developed by the Yanke group. I would ask the Council whether they see that to be a conflict or not in hearing of this issue and if so then I will stand down. Corrie: You are directly involved with this parcel? • • Meridian City Council May 7, 1996 Page 58 Morrow: No, I am not directly involved with this parcel I am a titled owner of a lot in Layne. Industrial Park which was developed by this same group of people. If the Council perceives that to be a conflict I will stand down. Rountree: Mr. Mayor I would move that the Council .does not perceive Mr. Morrow's situation with property ownership a conflict of interest. Bentley: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree, second by Mr. Bentley that there is no conflict. and that Mr. Morrow can continue on with the Council on this hearing, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Tolsma: Mr. Mayor I will have to declare a conflict because I do a lot of work for Mr. Ron Yanke (inaudible) Morrow: I would move that Mr. Tolsma's situation in doing work for the Yanke shop is not a conflict in the hearing of this issue. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree that there is no conflict with Mr. Tolsma, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Gary Lee, JUB Engineers, 1750 Summertree, was sworn by the City Attorney. Lee: Our request this evening before you is a preliminary plat known as Railside Industrial Park Subdivision. It is about 23 acres situated on Pine Road just west of Locust Grove. There are 13 lots planned in the development, average size in there is 1 to 1 1/2 acres in size for each lot. The intended use for this particular development it is zoned light industrial presently and is situated in the City limits of the City of Meridian. The property is surrounded on three sides anyway by industrial zoning, light industrial to the east, south and west. There is a piece of R-8 zoning right acxoss Pine Street to the north. There is an existing residential development there at this time called Maws Addition. The current use of that property is agricultural and has been for quite a few years. The improvements planned for the development include standard ACHD roads for all of the interior streets which will conform to their collector standard. The Pine Street widening program has been • • Meridian City Council May 7, 1996 Page 59 discussed at the Highway District. There will be additional rights of way dedicated there for future widening of Pine Street although I don't think that is going to take place anytime real soon. Locust Grove as you are aware takes a jog in that area to the east about 600 feet. It crosses the railroad tracks and couples up with Franklin Road. That jog will eventually be eliminated so there are plans for right away along the east boundary for this project for the extension of Locust Grove Road. We have met with the Highway District to review the requirements and standards as well. Although that stretch of road won't be built at this time either. Within the development we have requested a waiver from both the Highway District and the City on installing sidewalks on one side of street for the interior street running north south known as Ralston. The interior street running east and west known as Commercial. ACHD has granted their approval for that waiver and we would like or request the same from the City. The preliminary plat has also identified some landscaping buffers along Pine Road at the request of Shari Stiles we have shown 20 feet in there. We would like to request that the Council consider that those, that easement or that landscaping be placed in an easement in lieu of a common lot.. Our reasoning behind that is there is no purpose for a business owners association for this development. We would like to stay away from having one developed just to maintain landscaping. The way the lay out is situated that would affect two lots on Pine Street, they won't be taking access directly on Pine but they will have a continuous strip of land along there. We would like to keep it in an easement. We have reviewed the ACHD staff comments and we concur with that they have recommended and we will be working with them in the final design for roadway widths and so on and so forth. We have reviewed the City Engineer and City Planner comments and there were three of them in that. list that we would like to discuss. The first one being general condition #4 about the sidewalk issue. Again we would like to request a waiver on that on those two streets I mentioned previously. On site specific condition #4 the landscaping again, like I said place that in an easement in lieu of a common lot. Also, there was mention of discussion for landscaping along the west boundary of the property since it borders an existing home and it also will border future alternate living housing project in that area. We have spoken to the developer the Wayne Forrey and he offered testimony at the P & Z meeting last month about his involvement in developing some landscape buffer on his project. The last item is site specific condition 7 where the City Engineer has mentioned the requirements for a common lot for an existing sewer line that traverses along the south boundary of the property. 1 might point out that sewer line is in place and has been for a few years but there is no easement for it on the property. We would like to request that an easement be established in the plat and not a common lot. The reason being is that we would like to have access fa use of that property or possibly fire lanes or maybe future access to rail. So we would like to see an easement there rather than a lot. The other items on the list we concur with and will provide during the final platting stages. If you have any questions I would be glad to entertain those. • • Meridian City Council May 7, 1996 Page 60 Corrie: Council, any questions? Rountree: I have a question, who is going to maintain the landscaping if it is in an easement? Lee: The property owner for the lots. Rountree: Who is going to put the landscaping in? Lee: Well there was a discussion about that at P & Z meeting. I believe the developer would if it was a requirement of the City to do it initially with construction. However the best situation for them would be postponement until the site plan is submitted on each of those lots to take care of it at that point. Rountree: That is all I have. Corrie: Mr. Tolsma? Tolsma: (Inaudible) Lee: I suppose if that is an issue for the city that it can be worked into either the CC&R's or your conditions of approval that a certain type or quantity of landscaping would be required. That is something that the City planning staff could address and (Inaudible) conformity is an issue then certainty I think it can be addressed in some special documents. Tolsma: (Inaudible) Lee: It wasn't the intent to combine the two easements. Really now that you brought it up it wasn't really a site specific condition on the review and maybe we would like to ask the question is it really required along Locust Grove. If not we just assume not put it in because it is an industrial use. Our initial plan was 20 along Pine and 10 along Locust Grove and then a utility easement along that. Tolsma: (Inaudible) Stiles: I don't remember when we discussed this, Gary came in at our pre-application meeting and the ten foot came up. I don't really remember what I told him about that. It is required on Pine Street because of the residential properties across the street. I am concerned that be in place prior to the rest of that. Prior to any development taking place in there to provide that protection and buffer for those residential properties. It escapes Meridian City Council May 7, 1996 Page 61 me where the ten foot came ftom on Locust Grove except that it would be just nice to have.. I don't believe it is designated as any type of entrance corridor in the comp plan. Lee: We did talk about the ten feet on Locust Grove and if it is not going to be a requirement then our feeling is we would like not to put it in. Pine street that would be fine and we expect to but it is not required on Locust Grove, we are going to have industrial users on the other side of the street. Stiles: We would require landscaping for each parcel (inaudible) and we have been requiring perimeter landscaping or trying to require perimeter landscaping for these lots in the industrial subdivision. It is real hard to try and get anybody in an industrial subdivision to put any landscaping in. I e uirement t ough fo eanything on Locust Grove. to have. I-don't believe that there is a r q Morrow: Unless we make a requirement. Lee: (Inaudible) that is why it is on the drawing because Shari and I did talk about it. But it didn't come up on the site specific conditions so that is why I posed the question, is it really required. Morrow: If 1 may offer in terms of what we have been doing because of problems that we have experienced with these very landscaping issues with respect to the easement thing is some months ago we as a Council went to requiring business in industrial parks and developments just to be like the residential in terms of making common lots and a homeowners association if you will, a business owners associations or whatever to take care of it. We have not experienced en stated earliere I guefss it would also ask Gary n handling for the reasons that have be terms of your feelings of item 7, the 20 foot sewer easement should be designated as a separate lot by our policy. Your reaction to his, Gary Lee's proposal? Smith: I first of all didn't know that sewer line was the without an easement. It was installed to provide sewer to Layne Industrial Park on Lanark Street I believe so I don't know. Layne did that, as part of their, provide that easement, built that sewer. I don't know why it is not there. Secondly, I have assumed a problem with easements that John Anderson has with easement for sewer for water lines or for irrigation lines. As far as I am concerned if an easement didn't show up again for sewer line that would be just fine. have real problems with not being able to get to a sewer line because something has been built over it. We have got, I can tak vate for hat sewer9 ne weocan't,~we wtould have to over sewer Imes. If we have to exca go around the building if we had a problem, easements all three. I don't know what, I can understand this applicant's concern over having an alley there on the back side of these • Meridian City Council May 7, 1996 Page 62 industrial lots that is probably not a good idea. I don't know what is a good idea. Being able to get to the sewer line is our requirement, it is our responsibility to maintain that. If we have to go through gate after gate after gate, fence after fence with locks, however it is to be handled I don't know. I am battling the sewer line easement in Tract Subdivision right now that was caused by the developer not doing what he said he was going to do. It is back in our lap to try and resolve it. tam going to resolve it to a certain point but I am not backing off of the requirement that was made to an extent where the City of Meridian has to incur some additional responsibilities to maintain a sewer line. If these sewer lines can be put into areas that are accessible at all times by the City then the development community is going to have to figure out something else as far as Gary Smith is concerned. Morrow: So do you really feel strongly about this? Rountree: Do you have any opinion Gary? Smith: I am gradually forming one. Gary Lee and I did talk about this and I understand the problem with having an alley back there and maybe this isn't the place for me to get on my soap box but I had a chance. Morrow: Thank you, you have answered the question very well. Lee: Could that be a dedicated right of way? Smith: I guess you get into the situation where once you get into a 20 foot accessway how do you get out of it. We need a turn around someplace. We can't, with our hydrocleaner, dragging that thing behind a pick up, it is pretty tough to back it up for that distance I would say. So we need to think about doing something else and I don't' know about deed restrictions if that is an alternative or not. Lee: What about granting a use easement to the property owner if it is a common lot? Again like you say you have fence and gate problems. Smith: I don't know how accessible these things would be if we had a plug in the line and we had to access it after normal business hours for the particular lot, can we go about cutting our way through the fence to get in there, I don't know what legally we can do or if that is something that is addressable in a deed restriction. We try to notify the owner if we can't get them and it is an emergency we bull doze the fence and go in and do what needs to be done. If there is a shed built over the line we bull doze that too and the property owner is responsible for putting it back. Lee: Well if you own the lot I guess what I am saying is that the easement will be granted • • Meridian City Council May 7, 1996 Page 63 to the user and the City would own the lot or have exclusive rights to it in some manner. - Smith: So it is kind of a thorny issue with me right at the moment because I am battling this other one too. Crookston: Gary are you going to have requests for variances, I didn't write them all down but at least for the sidewalks and the streets that you wanted to do differently. Lee: Well the sidewalk as I understand is a request for a waiver, not necessarily a variance. And the variance request we have for the next item is for pressure irrigation. Crookston: You had something else, a difference on the streets. Lee: No, not on the streets other than the sidewalk on Ralston and Commercial. We will comply with ACRD requirements on the streets. Crookston: I have it written down here waiver on streets. Lee: I must have mis-worded because there isn't a waiver on the streets. Crookston: I can't say right now whether or not there is a waiver procedure for sidewalks, I don't believe that is how it is. Lee: Well I think that is how we handled it in Layne Industrial anything that was over 100 feet was a request for a waiver to the City. Is that how we handled that Gary, before, think it was. Stiles: We waived that requirement in Layne Industrial Park, it does say in the ordinance that the City may waive the requirement for sidewalk on both sides if the lots are over 100 feet. I don't really think in this kind of a subdivision it would serve any purpose to have them on both sides. Crookston: I recall that now from going through Cherry Lane Subdivision, the Lake at Cherry Lane No. 5 there where they wanted sidewalk on one side. Stiles: That was part of their conditional use permit for a planned development. Crookston: I ran into what you are talking about when I was dealing with that. Corrie: Anything else Gary? • ~. Meridian -City Council May 7, 1996 Page 64 Lee: l don't think so unless there are other questions? Corrie: Thank you Gary, anyone else from the public that would like to issue testimony? Seeing none I will Wayne Forrey, 3045 Thayen Place, Boise, was sworn by the City attorney. Forrey: Mayor and members of the Council, my wife and I are purchasing just under 13 acres immediately to the west, we border Ron Yanke's property here. So I hope That doesn't have a conflict of .interest because I am a neighbor. He is proposing a good development we don't have a problem with it at all. I wanted to re-emphasize am I understanding correctly that the City is requiring Ron Yanke to have a landscape strip where his property touches my property? I gathered from the P & Z Commission (Inaudible) Forrey: That is fine, that is perfect, we intend to fully landscape our side of the property. So I was going to reiterate that it is not necessary to impose that on this project. Corrie: Thank you Wayne, anyone else from the public that would like to offer testimony? Crookston: I would like to ask Mr. Lee a question. And mostly this pertains to the development of Mr. Yanke's property in comparison to what Mr. Forrey's doing, do you know what kind of uses are going to be proposed in there? Lee: Not at this time we don't there are lots in there that will be offered for sale. It will be similar I suppose to what is going on in Layne Industrial. Crookston: Thank you Corrie: Discussion Council? Rountree: The two items, one with respect to the landscape lots being common lots I think we need to make a condition on the preliminary plat. I think we need to resolve the sewer easement to a common lot. Other than that I don't have any problem with the preliminary plat. Morrow: I don't either except I would go further to say that I want to waive the five foot walk on both sides of the street, it needs to be just one side in an industrial park. I think for the sake of consistency we continue to do the common lot for landscape purposes. Gary is right about the easement situation with the sewer line thing. It needs to be a common lot • Meridian City Council May 7, 1996 Page 65 that can be maintained by the owners association. • Corrie: Any further discussion? 1 will close the public hearing. Morrow: Mr. Mayor I would move that we approve the preliminary plat for Railside Subdivision by Ron Yanke subject to the following conditions, the waiver is granted for the' five foot sidewalk on both sides of the street it would be on one side of the street only, that a common lot be required for the sewer line and common lot for landscape purposes to be administered by a business owners association. Tolsma: Second Corrie: Motion is made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Tolsma, any discussion? All those in favor? Rountree: I have one comment, do we need to in the motion indicate a preference for when that landscaping is put in like with the initial development? Morrow: I think it needs to be part of the development but in terms of what they did in Layne Industrial Park that has been a real fast project so the landscaping would be as they are cutting dirt they are forming the berm for the dirt for the roadways they form the been (End of Tape) Rountree: If you are comfortable from experience with that I have no problem. Morrow: Well I am not, if you want to make it part of the requirement that it be, I guess when else would you put it in. tt is a common lot, we have addressed the issue in terms of common lot, that should satisfy the requirement for being in and done. Corrie: (Inaudible) Morrow: It is also part of the development agreement in terms of the check list, it is the same as the occupancy permit that is what we are gravitating towards in the development agreement is just a checklist as opposed to being fairly lengthy (inaudible) Rountree: I am comfortable with your .explanation Walt. Corrie: Okay, you have heard the motion and second, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: MAY 7 1996 APPLICANT: RON YANKE ITEM NUMBER; 14 REQUEST; PUBLIC HEARING• PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR RAILSIDE SUBDMSION AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS "REVIEWED" SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ~~~~ ~~ SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ~~U~ OTHER: A~11 Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 9, 1996 Page 27 hearing. Crookston: Don't you want to continue the public hearing for a presentation by the applicant? Johnson: Yes, that is a good suggestion, !will not close the public hearing I will leave it open so we can receive the applicant's testimony. We will need a motion to table it to our next meeting even though we have a request from the applicant. Oslund: Mr. Chairman, 1 move we go ahead and keep it open and go ahead and table it to the regularly scheduled meeting in May. Hepper: Second Johnson: All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #11: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR RAILSIDE SUBDIVISION BY RONALD YANKE: Johnson: At this time I will open the public hearing and invite Mr. Yanke or his representative to address the Commission. Gary Lee, JUB Engineers, 1750 Summertree, was sworn by the City Attorney. Lee: The application before you this evening is a request by the applicant of approval of a preliminary plat known as the Railside Industrial Park Subdivision. This development consists of 13 industrial lots ranging in size between 1 and 1 /2 acres. It is situated on 22.8 acres off of Pine Road just directly west of Locust Grove. It is north of the rail road and situated in a presently zoned industrial or I-L zone. The intent obviously is to develop light industrial uses in that park as presented in the preliminary plat the uses will identify and comply with the current ordinances. This particular piece of property as well as surrounding parcels to the east, south and west is in an I-L zone and has been for quite some time. It is bordered to a residential subdivision to the north known as Maws Addition which is in an R-8 zone. The current use of the property has been in agriculture production for quite some time. As you have seen earlier this evening there is an application just to the west boundary of it by Mr. Forrey for the residential use. There are services available on Pine Street for water and sewer as well as a sewer line along the south boundary adjacent to the existing railroad track. There has been a variance application submitted to the City which I guess will be heard by the City Council seeking Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission Apri 19, 1996 Page 28 a variance on the pressurized irrigation ordinance. This project being an industrial use will be mainly hard surfaced areas, buildings, and very minimal landscaping. There will be some provided to meet the minimum requirements. of the City. There will be a landscape buffer along Pine street in accordance with the City staff recommendations of a 20 foot wide strip and also a ten foot wide .strip along the future Locust Grove as it may extend in the future. There has also been a request for a waiver on sidewalk on one side of the street on Ralston and Commercial Avenue.. This is very similar in nature to the Layne Industrial Subdivision that was approved about a year ago just to the east of this property on the present Locust Grove site. The lot dimensions are 185 to 200 foot in frontage so this waiver we believe is a reasonable request. There are no commercial uses or attractions in the neighborhood that would cause an excessive amount of pedestrian traffic. We have reviewed at least technical staff review from ACRD on their comments regarding right of way and road widths. We have agreed to shift the right of way along Pine Street southerly so that the existing improvements along Maws Addition can stay as they are today. By doing this we are giving up additional right of way there to accommodate future plans (inaudible) street through there. Also there wilt be an adjustment to the right of way along Locust Grove to line up with the present Locust Grove north of Pine. A couple of comments from the City Engineer and City Planner. A letter we received on Friday, general condition 4 speaks to the waiver, we would like to have the waiver on the sidewalk to have it on one side of Ralston and Commercial Avenue. Site specific condition 4, we would like to request that the landscaping along Locust Grove and Pine Street be placed. in an easement and the maintenance of that landscape easement be by the individual lot owner rather than in a designated common lot. The reason for that is this particular development we have no cause or reason to form a business owners association and we would like not to do that. Site specific condition 7 where the City Engineer spoke about the common lot for the sewer tines along the south edge of the boundary of the project. We would like to discuss this further with the City Engineer and see if we can't have some sort of exclusive easement right for the City and keep that on private property. We may suggest that maybe limit the use of that property to either emergency vehicle access or possibly parking and restrict any storage or building use. Again we don't want to have to form a homeowners association to maintain the common lots that would be an unreasonable request. (End of Tape) Lee: Well that concludes my presentation, I would entertain any questions that you may have at this time. Johnson: Questions of the applicant from the commissioners? Hepper: Gary I had a question on these site speck comments from Shari Stiles and Bruce Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 9, 1996 Page 29 .. Freckleton, #4 states that a 20 foot planting strip would be required. It says as residential properties abut this subdivision 20 foot planting strips are required adjacent to existing residential properties to the north and the west of the subdivision. Do you agree with putting a 20 foot planting strip down the west side? Lee: That would be the residential house that is on the corner I suppose you are speaking of? Hepper: Well to the west of your project wouldn't that be Forrey? Lee: Well there is a jog in the parcel and there is an existing home situated on Pine Street. Yes you are correct in stating that part of it adjoins Wayne Forrey's property. Ostund: Their's is right here, Forrey's is right here. Just a little clarification once again, Forrey's property is to the west of your property. Lee: Starting on the northwest corner of Lot 2 that is correct. Although that piece west of Lot 1 is owned by a third party and there is a house on that property now. Hepper: (Inaudible) 20 foot landscape strip down the west side, apparently it says, because those are both residential, Forrey's would also be residential. Lee: I did have a conversation with Wayne Forrey and his comment to me at the time was he is planning on some landscape buffering on his development. He wasn't going to make any undo hardships on future developments along this already approved industrial area. Hepper: That is kind of what I was getting at was if you had worked anything out to accommodate each other or just see that Shari's request is met. Lee: I guess we would probably like to entertain that portion line along the west boundary of Lot 1 which is a single family residence, there is a fair amount of separation between the boundary and his home at present by his own property. His property is an industrial zone. Oslund: So let's say that again then, along Lot 1 and Block 2 you are not proposing to landscape. Lee: No Oslund: How about along Blocks 2, 3, 5 of Block, I am sorry Lot 2, 3 and 5 of Block 2? • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 9, 1996 Page 30 Lee: No, no plans for landscaping there. Oslund: I guess I would, the fact that Wayne has come in and is proposing a residential, basically a residential development to your west, somebody is going to have to put something in there and buffer. It seems to me that since Wayne was in here a little earlier, the only thing that seems logical is that this particular application you would be required to put the buffering even though he beat you only by 30 days. Lee: This is all industrial use in this area. Hepper: I believe that Wayne testified and we could ask him that he testified before that he would be willing to put in the required buffering so as not to place a hardship on the industrial that was previously there before his property. So I guess before we go too much farther we need to maybe get a comment from Wayne on this too. Johnson: Any other questions of Mr. Lee? MacCoy: I do, you don't have any problem with item 10, a note will be placed on the final plat that states no direct access will be allowed to Pine and Locust Grove, are your plans to be all internal? Lee: Yes, that is fine, that is correct. MacCoy: ACRD will have their statement I am sure, but I just think it is good policy to maintain internal, you don't end up with a problem. Lee: We agree MacCoy: You had shown your drawing here JUB Engineering drawing that you have a 58 foot right of way, what set that? Lee: That is the ACHD revised policy for collector streets. MacCoy: For 58 not 60? Lee: That is correct, it will have the same size street within that right of way as it always has and that will be 41 feet back to back. Johnson: Anything else Malcolm? MacCoy: No, that covers mine, Gary and Shari have covered most of them. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 9, 1996 Page 31 Oslund: I have got another, you kind of peaked my interest when we mentioned about the: lots. Block 2 and Lot 1 and Block 1 those lots abutting East Pine. If you want to create a 20 foot landscaping easement there rather than a common parcel to affect the landscaping improvements. I guess I wonder, I understand what you are trying to achieve there. What is the easement, what is the purpose of the easement. Could you just make that one ownership lot? Lee: Well it would be a specific site easement on that lot for landscaping. And the CC&R's should address those two lots as being required to have landscaping in that easement. Oslund: Easements ftom who to who? I guess I don't understand. Lee: Well I guess since it is a City requirement the easement should be for the benefit of the City so it is part of their beautification of the entry into the City of Meridian. Or it could be for the beneficial use of the lot owners in the subdivision, either one. Oslund: That seems a little peculiar to me, because they are not really, the other, I don't see what the benefit is to the other. If you are going to do that it seems to me you just make it again a common ownership parcel and just ~ ahead and do it the way we have seen it on others. I guess and maybe it is directed more to Wayne, if we try to do something like that, in other words create some landscaping upfront that none of the other parcels have any involvement in does that make a case at ail for possibly improving all of these parcel under the preliminary plat and then putting lots 1 and 1 along East Pine Street of the conditional use permit. I don't see how we hake any control if we approve the preliminary plat with this kind of arrangemerrt. I don't see how we Crookston: The concern is going to be who is going to take care of that landscaping. Oslund: Or that it gets done, how do we know that it will get done, I guess it what I am asking. We trust you guys, don't get us wrong. Lee: Well I guess our point of view is really the only people that are going to benefit from that lot or that landscape easement won't ~ the users in the development. It is not a common open space area for them to enjoy necessarily. And then you have only got 2 landowners to get after for landscaping maintenance or whatever the City may see fit rather than 13. Oslund: I agree, I guess I just don't see the purpose of the easement there because when you grant an easement you are granting something to somebody so they and they pay something to receive that benefit. f see those iwo parcels, if an owner, a particular owners wants to dress up frontage maybe that is something that they would like. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 9, 1996 Page 32 . Lee: Well maybe we should handle that in the CC&R's then to make those restrictions on those two lots and those along Locust Grove. (Inaudible) 20 feet landscaping and you can be specific on what you want, so many trees, so much in the way of shrubs and so on and so forth. Oslund: Well if we were to approve the preliminary plat with a condition or not a condition but the fact that we would show that there. was some landscaping up front what is the process for affirming that is going to happen? . . Johnson: Shari Stiles would you like to address the landscaping issue if you would at this point (inaudible). Stiles: Chairman Johnson and Commissioners I believe this came up in the Valley Center Subdivision, I am not sure how that ended up whether they required an easement or a lot. I believe Mr. Morrow was quite specific that he wanted a lot. The main concern is consistency of the landscaping that it fit as one unit and that it be done prior to any building on the rest of the plat so that planting strip which is intended as a buffer for the residential across the street be in place prior to do any construction on the lot. I think that they could probably handle it with probably a note on the final plat and in the covenants that I believe the Council can make the condition that landscaping be construct prior to beginning any construction on any portion of the plat. Johnson: Is that a similar case where only two of 13 lots owners would benefit from the easement or was it a situation where the landscaping area ran the length of the project or do you recall specifically. Is it really similar to what we are talking about here? Stiles: It is somewhat similar, they had much more frontage on Overland Road. There is really nothing across the street from them and also it was a new annexation. This property has been annexed for many years and we cannot require a development agreement as part of the plat. Johnson: If as Mr. Lee suggests they handle this through the CC&R's do you think that would be acceptable to you, do you think that would be acceptable to the City Council? Stiles: I think that if the maintenance is handled through the CC&R's I still do believe that it should be constructed as part of the initial improvements. Johnson: And your hammer on that, your leverage on that to satisfy Commissioner Oslund is what? Stiles: Prior to their getting a signature on the final plat they would need to bond for those Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 9, 1996 Page 33 ~~ improvements. Johnson: Or do the improvements. Stiles: Right Johnson: And Gary do you have any comments regarding Shari Stiles' comments? lee: No, I really don't think that is a concern. I think our biggest concern was forming an association and having a corporation formed just to take care of landscaping. Johnson: I can see where you wouldn't want to do that (inaudible) and I don't think that is appropriate either. I wonder if there is a better way of handling it. As long as you have the signature or development agreement or something (inaudible) seems to me we could be satisfied it would be completed because that seems to be Commissioner Oslunds Concern that it will get done even though he trusts you guys. Mr. Forrey, since your name came up in vain here several times would you make yourself available please so we could ask you a couple of questions. Wayne Forrey, 3045 Thayen Place, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Fon-ey: Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, I met some time ago with Mike Ford who is an executive with Ron Yanke Company. I committed to Mr. Ford that on our project our retirement center campus we would build a lot of landscaping and quality screening and fencing and it would not be necessary to ask them to do any of that work. I made that same commitment to Gary Lee I think on two occasions. Our project abuts only a portion; my entire property is the west boundary here except for the home on Pine. The elderly campus is toward the north part of my property. So I am not asking for a special landscape strip we will provide that ourself we will self buffer and screen. I don't think it is appropriate to ask these gentlemen to do it, we are perfectly happy without it. Johnson: Any other questions of Mr. Forrey or any other questions? to other words you told us what we wanted to hear. Thank you Wayne I appreciate it. Is there anyone else from the public or does the applicant stilt (inaudible). Lee: I am finished unless there are some questions? Johnson: Thank you Gary, any other people in the audience that would like to address the Commission on this application. No further comments Mr. Lee? I will Gose the public hearing at this time. This would require findings of fact and conclusions of law. i ~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission Apri 19, 1996 Page 34 Oslund: I thought it was just a plat? Johnson: You are right it is just a plat, sorry about that, recommendation. Hepper: Mr. Chairman, I move that we recommend approval on the preliminary plat. MacCoy: Second Johnson: Commissioner Hepper motions for approval, seconded by Commissioner Malcolm MacCoy, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea FIVE MINUTE RECESS ITEM #12: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PHOTOGRAPHIC PORTRAIT STUDIO BY BERTON & DEANNA SPENCER: Johnson: At this point I will open the public hearing and invite the applicant or the applicant's representative to address the Commission. Berton Spencer, 213 E. 3rd, was sworn by the City Attorney. Spencer:. Originally when we began this process and what we determined was really quite a process what we would basically need is we need a place to do some photographic portraits. The main thing that we are considering is for like seniors and at this location there wouldn't be more than one possibly two seniors there at a time. It is going to be very limited. The other thing would be interviewing and discussing wedding plans with brides should we do weddings. Most of our work is done on site. For instance working with seniors on the green belt, environmental type work. We originally made the application for the enclosing the car port for a photographic studio and I saw that there were several questions and comments with regard to that. Basically how we feel at this particular time is that anything that if you don't want to enclose it we won't enclose it. I have also noticed that there are also some concerns about a sign and that sort of thing. This would be an appointment only sort of situation that we would like to have at this location. I am not sure at this particular time if an accessory use permit might be a better thing than a full conditional use permit but we would just like to state that any, we would be more than willing to work with the Commission on anyway it would allow us to be able to do this. Johnson: Thank you Mr. Spencer,- any questions from the Commissioners to the Applicant? WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney MEMORANDUM: ~ • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live WALT W. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CITY OF MERIDIAN EE C GLENN R. BENTLEY 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 P & Z COMMISSION Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Public Works/Building DepatUnent (208) 887-2211 TIM HEPPER Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND ROBERT D. CORRIE MALCOLM MACCOY Mayor Apri14, 1996 To: Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning From: Bruce Fre on, Assistant to City Engineer Shari S~~Z Administrator Re: RAILSIDE INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION (Preliminary Plat - By Ronald Yanke) We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, for your information and consideration as conditions of the Applicant during the hearing process: 1. Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project, shall be tiled per City Ordinance 11-9-605.M. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3 . Determine the seasonal high groundwater elevation, .and submit a profile of the subsurface soil conditions as prepared by a soil scientist with the development plans. 4. Provide 5-foot-wide sidewalks on both sides of proposed streets in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-9-606.B. 5. Water service to this development is contingent upon positive results from a hydraulic analysis by our computer model. C: \OFFICE\ W P W IN\C3ENHRAI.\RAIISIDH. PP ~~~~ ~ 6. Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, and road base to be approved by the Ada County Highway District prior to any building permits being issued. 7. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian's Water Works Superintendent. Fire hydrant locations shall be depicted on the preliminary plat map. 8. Indicate any existing FEMA Floodplain Boundaries on the Preliminary Plat Map, and/or any plans to reduce said boundaries. 9. Respond, in writing, to each of the comments contained in this memorandum, and submit to the City Clerk's Office prior to the scheduled hearing. 1. The treatment capacity of the Meridian Wastewater Treatment Plant is currently being evaluated. Approval of this application needs to be contingent upon our ability to accept the additional sanitary sewage generated by this proposed development. The subdivision designer is to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Meridian Public Works Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of roadway centerlines. 2. The subdivision designer is to coordinate water main routing with the Meridian Public Works Department. Water lines shall be located on the north and east sides of roadway centerlines. The City of Meridian desires to have a 12" diameter water main extended from Pine Street to the Oregon Short Line Railroad in the future Locust Grove Extension. We feel that this development should shoulder 'h of the main line extension cost. Further research needs to be done to find out the best method of posting surety for this cost. 3. The Ada County Highway District Development Services Draft Report for this development, in part, calls for the dedication of 52' for right-of-way south of the section line in Pine Street, and requires the construction of a 5' wide sidewalk within an easement in the 20' landscape lot. Pine Street, designated as a minor arterial in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, should have a 90' right-of-way. Maws Addition, to the north of this property, has only dedicated 30' from centerline; therefore, with ACHD's conditions, a total of 82' will be provided. The ACHD report also calls for the dedication of 48' of right-of--way west from the ultimate centerline of the Locust Grove extension. As the Maws Addition No. l has only A:~RA111,31DE.PP i ~12G; I s, de ~a ye. 3 dedicated 33' from the section line on Locust Grove Rd. , this alignment may need to be offset to avoid disrupting seven existing home sites. 4. As residential properties abut this subdivision, 20' planting strips are required adjacent to the existing residential properties to the north and west of this subdivision. The City, as a condition of preliminary plat approval, should require that a common landscape lot, a minimum of 20' beyond required right-of--way on Pine Street, be included on the plat for ownership and maintenance by the subdivision association. Although the existing residence on Pine Street west of this property is also zoned I-L, consideration for buffering of this parcel should also be given. 5. Provide 250-watt high pressure sodium streetlights at locations designated by the Meridian Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 6. Provide statements of dedications to the public and/or easements, together with a statement of location, dimension and purpose of such. Designate the Oregon Short Line Railroad right-of-way on the plat, as well as any eausting easement/right-of-way for the drain on the westerly boundary. 7. The proposed 20' sewer easements shall be designated as separate lots per Meridian City policy. The sewer access easement shown between Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, is not needed. $. Any proposal for a supplementary connection from the City's water system to the pressurized irrigation system will need to be reviewed closely due to the size of the area to be watered. Applicant shall provide a statement as to the ownership of and operation and maintenance for the pressurized irrigation system. 9. Temporary perimeter fencing is to be provided prior to obtaining building permits to contain construction debris. Permanent, non-combustible fencing is to be provided outside of the UPRR right-of--way/easement. 10. Add note that no direct lot access is allowed on Pine Street or Locust Grove Road. 11. Revise the Preliminary Plat to include all proposed and existing utilities including pressurized irrigation, with proposed source (unless a variance is granted), and addressing all other comments contained herein. Resubmit the Preliminary Plat with all revisions. A:\RAII,SIDE.PP HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • WILLIA;~A G. BF_RG, JR., City Clerk ~JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Flre Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney A Good Place to Live WALT W. MORROW, President CITY OF MERIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA EYEE C G ENN R. BENTL 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 P & Z COMMISSION Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Public Worlcs/Building Department (208) 887-2211 TIM HEPPER Motor Vehicle/Drivets License (208) 888-4443 JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND ROBERT D. CORRIE MALCOLM MACCOY Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: April 2. 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/18/96 HEARING DATE: 4/ 2/96 REQUEST: Preliminary Plat for Railside Subdivision BY: Ronald Yanke LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: South of Pine Road, West of Locust Grove Road JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z GREG OSLUND, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z BOB CORRIE, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C GLENN BENTLEY, C/C -WATER DEPARTMENT -SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT} ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATIO~P ~ LIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES (~ OTHER: d" (~ YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: MAR 1 9 1996 CITY O>F 1~EKIDUN 7iFFICiAc$ G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • A Good Place to Live WALT W. MORROW, President CITY OF MERIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA EE C L ENN R. BENTLEY G 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, ID/gHfT 83642 P & Z COMMISSION Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 TIM HEPPER Motor Vehicle/Drivers Liotase (208) 888-4443 JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND ROBERT D. CORRIE MALCOLM MACCOY Maya TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning 8z Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk. by: April 2, 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/18/96 HEARING DATE: 4/ 2/96 REQUEST: Preliminary Plat for Railside Subdivision BY: Ronald Yanke LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: South of Pine Road, West of Locust Grove Road JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z GREG OSLUND, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z BOB CORRIE, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C GLENN BENTLEY, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT} BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES(,' OTHER: ~° ~D° YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: CITY PLANNER S+a-c~/ .~-~ C.c.)~t- ~ ~' .c.~-~- 14~t.~ t"~ Iii K~ Sl7ri ~+ ~ ~~+'r sh S ~ ^^Y' .~'~° ~ ~- ~+G~.2 ~.ri~~0.[/- / i9 R ~.p G 4. i U awl r2,a C ~a~ ~ ~? tc~q~~ a (p cw ~a:"~ N ~ c ~o~ j -~' 3~" u' (A ~ A F ~7 i.+ RI ~. ~ i~+ ~ E. r fll ^ .~. «~i. ^ y .~'. ~v ad = ~ ° O :ife~ co ~ ~ ° O ^ ~ ~~p1 E~ ~' O ~.~ ~°y Z ~•a ~ 7 pa :v ~ .(06 .~j m w v_ O C+7 N ~ c D! ~ ~ d 6 Z ~ ~ E eV1o L',~' ~ A ~O C 7 c~ d n ~ 6 N n 7 S ?:'O O I C. Q ' ~ dg ~ co ~+ ~ ~9' I ~ ~ G. w, ~ :r ~ -~ o' ~ I H °. ~ o m ~ ~ 3 a'te' ,~ n ~ =`~ ~ ~ H °, m ~• ~ <' x-~eoi m o 3~,b ~~ D s3 E '^E.f ~ arof 8 a H ^a°o v •a ^ ~ -~ E c o$ ~~ ~ w 70 ~ ~.~ ~ H m c ^~ .fl 5'~ y ~ ~ .x^, 'O o.~ o ^+' 9 f O ~ q° O ° n, c o o ° ~ ~ o c ~ ~'.n ~ ~ m n+ o ci ° ~ w m ~o `" F"3 o~ ~a~f° m ? ~°'rJE g~ yo•F o~ ~ R ~ a~ c wg ~, ~ ~ TrR ~~~ w ~' ~ ~~ w.,3 ~ a ~ ^° w- h`D$`~ W ^~ n,A ~~ o.~ ca c ~ 'day c ~~0.E N ~o ~co BE moo. ~~ 'J~CcJ Ro ~ H a w Q O f7N ~° ^ ~ S S .^... f D N ~ fV N~ M ,^~n S 7 C ~,~ O• ~ ^* 7 nt ~ 7 O ~ C •`~ b 000 ~. .~ ^ .,.n ~ a S ^ °. 3 m ^ ^ ~ g ~ '^ ~ 8. ~ ~ W~ ~ o ~ AE ~~ ~,m c ~ ~ v+ 0 a ~ 5'0v°~ in y ~ rtrtE~ ~ ~mrt~ c n rr N• ~C m ~ rt ~ ~ ~ i u • rn rt • u / e Yi N ~ , {. 1 ~ " G w F-~ N O UI ",3 s ~ N $ ~ fD ~ $ CT U1 ''Cf o g ~nm ro ~ ~~ ~ n n ~~ rt w ~~ ~ ~° rtfi ~ [n ~ ~' ~' O ~ ~•N•(p rh ,c ~ . ~° ~ ~+ Al (D ~ (D V7 ri ~A ~"S a c m w ~• a I-i ft W > a ~ ' ~ ~ ~• N N n O Z N O m ~NNNNN ~OJANODO p~A J U W W A U a V 1 ~ ~' Nr~D OD J W N O D ~ JtwAWw"' 00 30 ~ 0~ 0~ A ~ ~ Qp Qp Q tQ i i a 3 i t i 3~ GOO OO GGC p p p p .1 p p p p 0000 pQ p p p S ,p0000J 9~1 n tAW 0000 i a i a: a a s~ 86000068 JO. ~nA COB ~ WWNNr" 888gao . n~brTtAA twn to to xTx J,~~O~wOQ.~N ~ ~~~$8$$$25$8$8r588 Q.O lwnO ~~88 'e U~JyNy~~OO 88~25~ s x 9 g~ 8 ~ ~ 0 OWOb~WO.JOW JOUQipUOWJNJ s~ ~ ~ W~UrN. ~~ s ODUN~OJO ~~~s~ ~~~~s g~ggg~~g g ~ pp~~ po~~ pp~. ~ ,OW N J W ~ O A O ~ •U .~1~ /1 ~ A V 0 + D t / ~t J O O C W ~ A w D J N ~ ~~ 88 ~ p ppp~~Lpp1 {w11pp~1 pppp p p u yp ~pp pp O p pp p.pp a p p ~ OO OOOOOOOOOOOO~O p pp Qp p~ 8 OOGO p pp yp , p p p OOOOO~ 4 `L~ OgQO tJn~ JCpJgJ O~OCp~O~gT UNtA 1$8AAGAAAg8 a00000p 0000000000 WWWWg8 0000 NNNgNrr 08000$ x ~ fix' ~~ A W N ~~~ m r c ~L m ~ a m ~m~< ~ Z O N ~ x n c O D 2 7D C r v_ Z^ L/ N n 0 w a~ ..» ~ N . W $~ E ~ ~ C• H ~ ~ -o c ~, n ^ ~`~ c F o. C a ~~ z o ~ ~~ ~ ~ o ^O ~ ~ se C ^s.~ ~~ ~mc ~~ $ a 4 ~^ ~, a £ .' ~E~ 43 '~~ ~'~ V~o ~~ ~~ ~ ?~ ~~ ~~ B~ ~~ m~m rC~~. N 7 c ~~ ~~ a? S~ o ^ F s e 9 n. ~~ w ~ ~ s. ~ F 9 2 !t D c z O T m O m 2 O i a m 0 0 m • ~c~no JAMES E. BRUCE, President SHERRY R. HUBER, Vice President SUSAN S. EASTLAKE, Secretary TO: Ronald Yanke P.O. Box 5405 Boise D 3 5 FROM: Gallagh ,Coordinator Development Services Division SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat-Railside Industrial Park Pine Rd and Locust Grove Rd REcEiv~,~D ~~'-~ ~~ 6 199f~ CITY OF IIAERfDIAf~s April 11, 1996 On April 10, 1996, the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District (hereafter called "District") took action on the Preliminary Plat as stated on the attached staff report. In order that the Final Plat may be considered by the District for acceptance, the Developer shall cause the following applicable standard conditions to be satisfied prior to District certification and endorsement: 1. Drainage plans shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. 2. If public street improvements are required: Prior to any construction within the existing or proposed public right-of--way, the following shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District: a. Three complete sets of detailed street construction drawings prepared by an Idaho Registered Professional Engineer, together with payment of plan review fee. b. Execute and Inspection Agreement between the Developer and the District together with initial payment deposit for inspection and/or testing services. c. Complete all street improvements to the satisfaction of the District, or execute Surety Agreement between the Developer and the District to guarantee the completion of construction of all street improvements. ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714-6499 • Phone (208) 345-7680 • April 11, 1996 Page 2 3. Furnish copy of Final Plat showing street names as approved by the Local Government Agency having such authority toeether with payment of fee charged for the manufacturing and installation of all street signs, as required. 4. If Public Rights-of--Way Trust Find deposit is required, make deposit to the District in the form of cash or cashier's check for the amount specified by the District. 5. Furnish easements, agreements, and all other datum or documents as required by the District. 6. Furnish Final Plat drawings for District acceptance, certifications, and endorsement. The final plat must contain the signed endorsement. The final plat must contain the signed endorsement of the Owner's and Land Surveyor's certification. 7. Approval of the plat is valid for one year. An extension of one year will be considered by the Commission if requested within 15-days prior to the expiration date. Please contact me at 345-7680, should you have any questions. KG cc: Development Services Chron John Edney Chuck Rinaldi J-U-B City of Meridian ADA OUNTY HIGHWAY DIS RIOT Development Services Division Development Application Report Preliminary Plat -Railside Industrial Park Pine Road and Locust Grove Road Meridian Railside Industrial Park is a 13-lot industrial subdivision on 23-acres. The site is located at the southwest corner of Pine Avenue and Locust Grove Road extended. This development is estimated to generate additiona12,850 vehicle trips per day based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation manual. Roads impacted by this development: Pine Avenue Locust Grove Road ACRD Commission Date -April 10, 1996 - 7:00 p.m. ~ U ~ ~. 0 SITE in a~ c~ U O Franklin J ~ c ~ m - m y W E S J Q ~~ ~~ Z Z O s m W _J Q °~ ~~ a~ s u ~I~ ~~~ ~ a U N c F ...--° ~ _ ~ ~ i r .l i tttt-tit-tbi i~~ 1Vld AtltMIW ll3tld i --- _ --- 1 ~~ OU rA\ ~ octl-ttt-wt i.q../ I ~ ~ _ ~z ~J .'.~ i 02 ]lM5 I _ .. ~. _ _ ~ ]n. N. (IOO.M~)U .IfOS tRi _........ _.. ~..._.._ _i.. ~ ..". .. .. ... Wa Z= ~1; ~ ;~ ~~I Stl33N17N3 8'fl'f p9f1S 1~i1211S(14NI 301S'lIV2! ,,.~,,^ ' 'sa_ st 8~i~$ ~~g~a~ a~:i~~ j s0 ~ ~ ~; 3 e~ 1i~~3F[i1F~~dFFF ii~~i4~~i55 i I it f C~~ j~ ~i'! `~N/1six~ ano?1 ~ J-Snao't ~7 a_ ~- 1 ~~ --- g . ~. <.4 b°~~ `02 E AILLS ~• in'33 :~ J rr s M ~~,~ re r~bX ~p ^~-~ T ^ Y6 ~~ e' 1 ~ ~' !I U;~ W ~1< ~~;~~ .~~ t s, ~a ~~a r R ~I .// I ; Y Y~s~ ~Y ~~~a it ~ ~1~~tt ~I { a 1~ t t I j 11 lit t~ fit }~j~ ,~ ~~j1 ' '' ° ~$ ' iii '~~ 1~~ i~l~t' ~l~f ~ f t ~ ~: E `:j t i'' !+~ yy II((i ~ ~ ' , ~ t ~ j r( ~ ~ S 71 2i!((i jjli~ a i, f(~ Q j o ~~d i~i ~i~ :~:!2~ liDi 3 !~ id . 't~ ~~ 1t z. .. s t _ w\tt -~,. , '";~= .= Facts and Findings: A. General Information I-L -Existing zoning 22.82 -Acres 13 -Proposed building lots 0 -Square feet of existing building 1,650 -Total lineal feet of proposed public streets (approx) 269 -Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) West Ada -Impact Fee Benefit Zone Western Cities -Impact Fee Assessment District pine Avenue Collector street with bike lane designation Traffic count 1,515 on 2/9/95 680-feet of frontage 50 to 55-feet existing right-of--way (25-feet south of centerline) 82-feet required right-of--way (52-feet south of section line) Pine Avenue is improved with 27-feet of pavement with curb, gutter and sidewalk on the north side of the street only. Locust Grove Minor arterial with bike lane designation No traffic count available 1,170-feet of frontage 0-feet existing right-of--way 96-feet required right-of--way Locust Grove is improved north of Pine Avenue with 35-feet of pavement with curb, gutter and sidewalk only on the west side. B. The site is undeveloped and is bordered by Pine Avenue on the north, Locust Grove Road extended on the east, the Oregon Short Line Railroad on the south, and unplatted land on the west with an existing dwelling on Pine Avenue. C. Locust Grove Road is planned to be extended south of Pine Street to Franklin Road in a straight alignment along the east side of this site. The applicant is not proposing access to the planned extension of Locust Grove Road. All of the lots in the subdivision can be accessed by the internal streets. When Locust Grove Road is improved in the future, Commercial Avenue will intersect Locust Grove Road. In the meantime, the subdivision can operate with the internal streets connecting to Pine Avenue. A temporary paved turnaround with a temporary easement to the District will be required at the east end of Commercial Avenue until Locust Grove Road is improved. RAILSIDE.WPD Page 2 • In accordance with District policy, staff recommends that the applicant be required to provide a $5,850.00 deposit to the Public Rights-of--Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing a 5- foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel (approximately 1,170- feet) prior to issuance of any required permits or District approval of a final plat, whichever occurs first. D. Pine Avenue abutting this site is not listed in the District's current Five Year Work Program. The Pine/Executive Corridor Report states that 90-feet of right-of--way is needed for this segment of Pine Avenue. The north right-of--way line has already been established with the platting of Maws Addition No.l (a single-family residential development). The City of Meridian will require a 20-foot wide buffer strip along Pine Avenue. Because of the constriction caused by the earlier development of Maw's Addition and the resulting 30-feet of dedicated right-of--way, staff recommends that the applicant dedicate 52-feet of right-of--way south of the section line (to total 82-feet) on Pine Street and construct the sidewalk in an easement in the 20-foot wide buffer strip. E. The applicant is proposing to stub Commercial Avenue to the site's west boundary. Staff supports this stub street. A temporary paved turnaround with a temporary easement to the District will be required at the west end of Commercial Avenue. The north-south road, Ralstin Street is proposed to intersect Pine Avenue aligned with Ralstin Street in Maws Addition No.l Subdivision. F. In accordance with District policy, staff recommends that the applicant be required to construct the streets within the subdivision with standard vertical curb, gutter, 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk, and a 41-foot street section within a 58-foot right-of--way prior to issuance of any required permits or District approval of a final plat, whichever occurs first. Staff recommends a waiver of policy that sidewalk be required on only one side of the internal streets, because the pedestrian traffic in industrial subdivisions is lower than in commercial or residential developments and can adequately be served on one side of the street. G. Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. If the driveway is not to be paved on site, staff recommends that the applicant pave the driveway its full required width of 30 to 40-feet to at least 30-feet beyond the sidewalk. H. The transportation system will be adequate to accommodate the additional traffic generated by this proposed development. I. This application is scheduled for a public hearing by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission on April 9, 1996. The following requirements are provided as conditions for approval: RAILSIDE.WPD Page 3 • Site Specific Requirements: 1. Dedicate 52-feet of right-of--way from the section line, or a total of 82-feet from the existing north right-of--way line, of Pine Avenue abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of--way (that which is in excess of 30-feet from the section line) from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone. If the owner wishes to be paid for the additional right-of--way, the owner must submit a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance, with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #188. 2. Dedicate 48-feet of right-of--way from the ultimate street centerline of Locust Grove Road extended abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of--way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone. If the owner wishes to be paid for the additional right-of--way, the owner must submit a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance, with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #188. 3. Construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk abutting the parcel on Pine Avenue within an easement to the District. The easement shall be recorded and the instrument number shall be noted on the final plat. The north edge of the sidewalk shall be at least 5-feet south of the future curb location. A 70-foot street section as measured from the existing back of curb on the north side of Pine Avenue will be constructed by the District at a future date. 4. Provide a $5,850.00 deposit to the Public Rights-of--Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel (approximately 1,170-feet) prior to issuance of any required permits or District approval of a final plat, whichever occurs first. 5. Ralstin Street shall align with Ralstin Street in Maws Addition No.l Subdivision. 6. Commercial Avenue extend from the right-of--way for Locust Grove Road to the west boundary of the site with a temporary easement for a paved turnarounds at the site's east and west boundaries. 7. All internal public streets shall be constructed with standard vertical curb, gutter, 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on one side and a 41-foot street section within 58-foot right-of--way. A 5- foot wide concrete sidewalk shall be constructed on the north side of Commercial Avenue and the west side of Ralstin Street. 8. Driveways shall be located a minimum of 50-feet from any intersection, as measured near edge of driveway to back of curb. RAILSIDE. WPD Page 4 • 9. Driveways shall be a minimum of 30-feet wide and a maximum of 40-feet wide, paved a minimum of 30-feet beyond the back of sidewalk. Shared driveways are encouraged. 10. Restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, as required by District policy, shall be placed on future development of this parcel. 11. Direct lot or parcel access to Locust Grove Road and Pine Avenue is prohibited. Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. Standard Requirements: A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the Development Services Supervisor. The request shall specifically identi each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of ~y such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity. The written request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a.m. on t_h_e day scheduled for Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. After Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Development Services Supervisor within two days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall specifically id n i each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to he Co mission at the time of its original decision. The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. 3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #188, also known as, Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. Aright-of--way permit must be obtained from ACRD for any street or utility construction within the public right-of--way. Utility cuts should be combined where practical to limit pavement damage. iliy street cuts in roads paved within the last five years will not be allowed unless approved by the District Commission. Contact Construction Services at 345- 7667 (with file number) for details. RAILSIDE.WPD Page 5 • 5. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and appropriate action by ACHD prior to District approval of the final plat or issuance of building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. The proposed drainage system shall retain all storm water on-site and shall conform to the requirements of the city or county having jurisdiction. Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the public right-of--way or in a common lot owned by a homeowners association set aside specifically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, or other valuable amenities placed in said easement. Drainage lots and their use restrictions shall be noted on the plat (when applicable). 6. Locate driveways a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot property lines when driveways are not to be shared with the adjacent property. 7. If sidewalk is to be constructed or is currently abutting the site, construct pedestrian ramps on the corner of all street intersection in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 40-1335. 8. Dedicate up to a 20-foot x 20-foot right-of--way triangle (or appropriate curve) to keep street improvements within the public right-of--way at all intersections abutting and/or within the development by means recordation of the final plat or prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. 9. Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across parcel. 10. Continue borrow ditch drainage abutting parcel (culvert may be required). 11. Provide written approval from the appropriate irrigation/drainage district authorizing storm runoff into their system. 12. If street improvements are required, locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drainage ditches and appurtenances, etc.) outside of the public right-of--way. Authorization for relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. If determined by the District, existing irrigation facilities may remain in the right-of--way with District review and approval of easements recorded for future relocation at a later date. 13. Locate proposed sign(s) out of the public right-of--way and out of the clear-vision sight- triangle of all street and driveway intersections. 14. Install a stop sign on every unsignalized approach of a project street to an intersection involving a collector or arterial as the cross-street. The stop sign shall be installed when the project street is first accessible to the motoring public. 15. The developer is required to install street name signs at the locations approved by the Ada County Highway District. Purchase street name signs, sign poles, and mounting hardware from ACHD's Traffic Operations Department or an approved outside supplier. The District will not manufacture street signs until a copy of the recorded plat showing the recording data has been provided to Development Services staff. RAILSIDE.WPD Page 6 16. Any portion of a street which is required by the District to be designated as no parking shall be posted by the installation of standard "no parking" signs. A signing plan shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer and submitted to ACHD Traffic Services staff for their review and approval prior to final plat approval by the District. If a final plat is not required, the signing plan approval shall be completed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permit). 17. Provide a clear vision sight triangle at all driveway and street intersections. Within this triangle no obstruction higher than 36-inches above the top of pavement will be allowed, including but not limited to landscaping, berms, fences, walls or shrubs. The triangle shall be defined with the long leg measured 200-feet to 540-feet (depending on speed limit) along the centerline of any road; and the short leg measured from the curb line of the road 20-feet along the centerline of the intersecting driveway or street (see District Policy Figure F7). Provide notes of these restrictions on the platlsite plan and street construction plans. 18. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District for review and appropriate action. 19. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for review and appropriate action by ACHD. 20. All public streets and drainage systems shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and policies. 21. Specifications, land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACHD shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54-1215. 22. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 23. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 24. The connection of driveways to the public street system is not allowed without approval of the District. To obtain approval, anyone proposing to construct a driveway is required to contact the Construction Services Division of the District to obtain a proper permit prior to commencing construction per District Policy 7207.9. 25. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. RAILSIDE. WPD Page 7 26. An chan e b the a scant in the lanned use of the propertyhich is the subject of this Y g Y PP P application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless awaiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. APR 12 1995 RAILSIDE.WPD Page 8 + RECEIVED SUBDIVISION EVALUATION S~EET APR 1 11996 (~tTY OF MERIDIAK Proposed Development Name RAII SmF INnt1STRIAL SUB _ ___ City MERIDIAN Date Reviewed 3/28/96 Preliminary Stage XXXXX Fina Engineer/Developer J-U-B Engr Inc /Ronald Yank The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Boise City Street Name Ordinance. The following existing ~+~pA+ n~rr, cc shall ap~,P ar ~±r? ±hP r~l at a s• "E PINE AVENUE" / "N LOCUST G ROVE ROA D" "E COMMERC IAL k~tfidH E~- ST i2 ~ ~T "N RALST IN irifl~ET~ -- ,~y~ t+1t~~ The street sho~~~n on the plat as N ORTH LOCU ST GROVE (FU TURE ) is ' 'gnment with the •i ing LOCUST GROVE ROAD that is nort h of it but i s ra rallPl to the existing LOCUST C;RC~VF RnAI~ that is ~~' of it Either the name of this section of road needs to have a new The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMM Ada County Engineer John Pries Ada Planning Assoc. Terri Rayn City of Meridian Represent. Meridian Fire District Represent. VES OR DESIGNEES Date ~ Date a Date 3 -2~'9,~ Date 3-29` 9>~ NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed !!!! Sub Index Street Index 3N 1 E 07_ Section NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS O~ ~`~ .3/Z>~/~~ D A~ 8 S ~~ ~t `~CI -z ~~ C _D O r Sv ~m zZ v ~~ ~~ CENTRAL CEN ~~• DISTRICT ~RHEALTH DEPARTMENT Rezone # DISTRICT HEALTH D Environmental Health Division } 111 ENT SAE ~ ~ 199 ~NTY ~:~~~ i~Ea?IDIal~.' Co se # eliminary / final /Short Plat ~4i /:.S'fDE ~ her/~;S~v..J Return to: ^ Boise ^ Eagle ^ Garden city ~leridian ^ Kuna ^ Acz ^ I . We have No Objections to this Proposal. ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. We can Approve this Proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: ^ 2 feet ^ 4 feet ^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. ~- 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ,~ central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines ~-central water ,~ 10. ^ I I. ^ 12. ^ 13. Street Runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. Stormwater disposal systems shall be reviewed by relative to: ^ Waste Disposal ^ Injection Well rules. ^ Groundwater Protection This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 14. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ~ ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store 15. J /~2~11Nir7~'7z /kil7/r~F~~iiiF~ % L~"r %~7~~y9 ~,S' ~77J~C/y~ Date: 3 / 2~ !~ Reviewed By: Review Sheet (DHD 10/91 rth, rev. I/9S • CENTRAL •• DISTRICT ~R' H EALTH .208 375-5211 • FAX:321-8500 DEPARTMENT MAIN OFFICE • 707 N. ARMSTRONG PL. • BOISE, ID. 83704 ( ) To prevent and treat disease and disability; to promote healthy lifestyles; and to protect and promote the health and quality of our environment. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that the first one half inch of stormwater be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality. The engineers and architects involved with the design of this project should obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals that could be used for guidance are: :1) GUIDELINES FOR TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF STORMWATER RUN OFF. Idaho Division of Environmental Quality, Southwest Idaho Regional Office, September 1995. 2) STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND, State of Washington Department of Ecology, February 1992. 3) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER AND SITE DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT. Serving Valley, Elmore, Boise, and Ada Counties Ada / lobe County OIAce 707 N. Amuhong p. Boise. ID. 83704 Enviro. Heath: 321.1499 Famiy Plarvtlnp: 327-1400 Immun¢otions: 32).7450 Nutritbn: 327.1460 WIC lase .Merman EYnae County OIAce Elmore Count' Once 1606 Roberts 520 E. 8th Sheet N, of Envirarmentd Heath ID. Boise Mountain Hone. ID. 190 S. 4th Sheet E. , 83105 Ph. 334.3355 83647 Ph. 5!1.4401 ID. t 324 Meridan, ID. Ph. 587.q~ 83647 83642 Ph. 888.6525 Volep Coudy Olke P.O.Boz 1448 MCCd. ID. !3638 Ph 634.7194 • ~~~E1V~~ ~~A p ~I'~li ; ERIDIQI`~ 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-888-6201 Phones: Area Code 208 03 April 1996 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Boise 343-1884 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Boise 345-2431 CITY OF MERIDIAN ' 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN ID 83642 ~~ • ~~~ /~ /~/, ~ Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District's Gruber Lateral courses along the South boundary of the project. The right-of-way of the Gruber Lateral is 30 feet: 15 feet from the center each way facing downstream. AND Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District's Snyder Drain courses along the North West corner of the project. The right-of-way of the Snyder Drain is 60 feet: 30 feet from the center each way facing downstream. See Idaho Code 21-120B--RIGHTS-OWAY NOT SUBJECT TO ADVERSE POSSESSION. The developer must contact John P. Anderson or Bill Henson at Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, 466-0663 or 345-2431, for approval before any encorachment or change of right- of-way occurs. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District requires a Land Use Change/Site Development application be filed for review by the Irrigation District prior to final platting. All laterals and waste ways must be protected. All municipal surface drainage must be retained or. site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must review drainage plans. Contact Donna Moore at 343-1884 or 466-7861 for further information. The developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805. It is recommended that irrigation water be made available to all developments within Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. ~~ Bill Henson, Asst. Water Superintendent Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 • • s 7?.a~ryla. & ~l~~cid~aoc ~lvuga~tioo~ D~a.~ctct 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651.4395 FAX # 208-888-6201 Phones: Area Code 208 Gary A. Lee P.E./L.S. J-U-B Engineers, Inc. 250 South Beechwood, Suite 201 Boise, ID 83709 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Boise 343-1884 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Boise 345-2431 RE: Land Use Change Application for Railside Industrial Park Dear Gary: Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to file with the Irrigation District for its review on the above- referenced development. If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call on Donna Moore at the District's office or John Anderson, the District's Water Superintendent at the District's shop. Sincerely, DAREN R. COON, SECRETARY/TREASURER NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT DRC/dnm cc: File Water Superintendent Ronald Yanke City of Meridian enc. C~Oo p~T APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS • 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 5 April 1996 WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk .JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Weste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney • • COUNCIL MEMBERS HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live WALT W MORROW, President CITY OF MERIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA EE GLENN R. B NTLEY 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 P & Z COMMISSION Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Pnblic WorksBuilding Depamixnt (208) 887-7211 TIM HEPPER Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4413 JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND ROBERT D. CORRIE MALCOLM MACCOY Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning Sz Zoning Commission, please submit your corrunents and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by:,.2.1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/18/96 HEARING DATE: - ~ REQUEST: Preliminary Plat for Railside Subdivision ~~ BY: Ronald Yanke LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: South of Pine Road. West of Locust Grove Road JIM JOHNSON, P/Z ~MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z GREG OSLUND, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z BOB CORRIE, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C GLENN BENTLEY, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ~Ec~l ~/E ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT I-~ALTH APR 0 3 199~R NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT CITY OF MERIDIAA+ IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ,~~ ,E~S,e.F~r ~o.M , ~.,~ ~o> ra is,E o~ rro ~ /lCoiZr?f R~LS~IN v C~O~fs t7/~/~Vi4l~ffs , / ~.._ ll~i~/ f/`.-/t- /1L0T u.'E'a ~~ ~+r~ ,~Ns'i~st F~~c ~~s's ~cac. ro C7.°r~ ~w -- C'i'P~' INK/•StiE~E~ TO Y~EH~ ~ GOC'/I S"T ~iQOY.C 771 ~ ZO ° ~LU~ D.E / Z ~ U ,E~QrL~-/~ ~° 7 T6 i4E /3~~/ - /3t~ Ci ~ ~Es' =ZZ~ ~A~ ¢/l ~~ ~~ ~. ~ ~~~~~ JUB ENGINEERS, INC. 250 S. Beechwood Suite 201 Boise, ID 83709 April 8, 1996 Bruce Freckleton & RECEIVED Shari Stiles APR 0 8 1996 City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Avenue MEFfDIAN CITY ENGIi+EER Meridian, ID 83642 Re: RAILSIDE INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION Your Memorandum dated April 4, 1996 Dear Bruce & Shari: I have reviewed your comments concerning the above referenced project and would like to respond as follows: GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The irrigation ditches that traverse through the project that will continue to deliver water to downstream users will be tiled in accordance with City Ordinance. In'igation Plans will be prepared and submitted with the Final Improvement Drawings. 2. There are no known existing wells or septic tanks on the site to abandon. 3. The seasonal high ground water will be determined by a professional qualified to make such an assessment. The results of their study will be submitted to the City Staff for review. The study will be conducted during the preparation of Final Improvement Drawings. 4. Five foot sidewalks will be provided in accordance with City Ordinance. However, as per the Preliminary Plat Application, the owner/developer has requested that a waiver be granted to allow for sidewalk along side of the street only. 5. We hereby request that a hydraulic water system analysis be pertormed to determine the adequacy of the City's water system to deliver the required water flows. Bruce Freckleton & Shari Stiles April 8, 1996_ Page 2 6. A letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee will be submitted to the City once their comments are received. Street signs will be installed, water system approved & activated, and road base approved by the ACRD prior to requesting building permits within this development. 7. During the preparation of the Water System Improvement Plans, we will meet with the City's Water Superintendent to agree upon the location of the fire hydrants. 8. Existing FEMA Floodplain Boundaries will be shown on the Preliminary and Final Plat, if they exist on-the property. 9. This letter is in response to the City's comments dated April 4, 1995. SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS 1. During preparation of the Sanitary Sewer System Improvement Plans, we will coordinate pipe line size and location requirements with the City Engineer. 2. During the preparation of the Water System Improvement Plans, we will meet with the City Engineer to properly size the water system delivery piping. Any surety requirements will be discussed with the City and the Developer. 3. Right-of-way dedication for Pine Street and Locust Grove Road is being reviewed by ACRD. The final R/W determination will be made at the ACRD Commission Meeting to be held April 10, 1996. Those revised R/W dimensions will be reflected on the Final Plat and Improvement Plans. 4. We have shown a 20 foot wide landscape strip along Pine Street to act as a buffer to the residential housing north of this project. In addition, a 10 foot wide landscape strip is shown along Locust Grove Road. However, the developer respectfully requests that the landscaping be placed in an easement for maintenance by each individual lot owner. Also, the owner to the west, Wayne Forrey, has indicated to us that he will install a landscape strip on his project to provide the necessary buffering between his residential development and this industrial use. 5. The required street lights will be planned for and shown on the Final Improvement Plans as they are on the Preliminary Plat or as approved by the City Engineer. • Bruce Freckleton & Shari Stiles April 8, 1996 _ Page 3 6. All existing Rights of Way and easements will be shown on the Preliminary and Final Plats. Any new proposed easements are shown on the Preliminary Plat as notes. These same easements will be reflected on the Final Plat. 7. The Final Plat will show the necessary sanitary sewer lines to be situated within a platted common lot. The easement between Lots 1 & 2, Block 3 will be eliminated. Also, the owner hereby requests that future land owners have access to the new sewer common lots as driveways, parking, etc. 8. The owner/developer does not intend to make a cross connection to the City of Meridian Water System for irrigation purposes. An application has been filed with the City requesting a Variance for the required Pressurized Irrigation System. Other Industrial Subdivisions in this area do not have Pressurized Irrigation Systems. 9. A temporary perimeter fence will be shown on the Final Improvement Plans and will be constructed prior to obtaining building permits. 10. A note will be placed on the Final Ptat which states that no direct access will be allowed onto Pine Street or Locust Grove Road. 11. A revised Preliminary Plat will be prepared and submitted for your review. It will address all of the responses contained herein. We hope that the information contained herein is an adequate response to your questions and concerns. If you need additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, J-U-6 ENGINEERS, Inc. Gary A. Lee, P.E./L..S. Project Manager cc: Mike Ford, Yanke Machine Shop f:~projects1111311adminlcityltrl.dx • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 9, 1996 Page 27 hearing. Crookston: Don't you want to continue the public hearing for a presentation by the applicant? Johnson: Yes, that is a good suggestion, I will not close the public hearing I will leave it open so we can receive the applicant's testimony. We will need a motion to table it to our next meeting even though we have a request from the applicant. Oslund: Mr. Chairman, I move we go ahead and keep it open and go ahead and table it to the regularly scheduled meeting in May. Hepper: Second Johnson: All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #11: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR RAILSIDE SUBDIVISION BY RONALD YANKE: Johnson: At this time I will open the public hearing and invite Mr. Yanke or his representative to address the Commission. Gary Lee, JUB Engineers, 1750 Summertree, was sworn by the City Attorney. Lee: The application before you this evening is a request by the applicant of approval of a preliminary plat known as the Raitside Industrial Park Subdivision. This development consists of 13 industrial lots ranging in size between 1 and 1 /2 acres. It is situated on 22.8 acres off of Pine Road just directly west of Locust Grove. It is north of the rail road and situated in a presently zoned industrial or I-L zone. The intent obviously is to develop light industrial uses in that park as presented in the preliminary plat the uses will identify and comply with the current ordinances. This particular piece of property as well as surrounding parcels to the east, south and west is in an I-L zone and has been for quite some time. It is bordered to a residential subdivision to the north known as Maws Addition which is in an R-8 zone. The current use of the property has been in agriculture production for quite some time. As you have seen earlier this evening there is an application just to the west boundary of it by Mr. Forney for the residential use. There are services available on Pine Street for water and sewer as well as a sewer line along the south boundary adjacent to the existing railroad track. There has been a variance application submitted to the City which I guess will be heard by the City Council seeking • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 9, 1996 Page 28 a variance on the pressurized irrigation ordinance. This project being an industrial use will be mainly hard surfaced areas, buildings, and very minimal landscaping. There will be some provided to meet the minimum requirements of the City. There will be a landscape buffer along Pine street in accordance with the City staff recommendations of a 20 foot wide strip and also a ten foot wide strip along the future Locust Grove as it may extend in the future. There has also been a request for a waiver on sidewalk on one side of the street on Ralston and Commercial Avenue. This is very similar in nature to the Layne Industrial Subdivision that was approved about a year ago just to the east of this property on the present Locust Grove site. The lot dimensions are 185 to 200 foot in frontage so this waiver we believe is a reasonable request. There are no commercial uses or attractions in the neighborhood that would cause an excessive amount of pedestrian traffic. We have reviewed at least technical staff review from ACRD on their comments regarding right of way and road widths. We have agreed to shift the right of way along Pine Street southerly so that the existing improvements along Maws Addition can stay as they are today. By doing this we are giving up additional right of way there to accommodate future plans (inaudible) street through there. Also there will be an adjustment to the right of way along Locust Grove to line up with the present Locust Grove north of Pine. A couple of comments from the City Engineer and City Planner. A letter we received on Friday, general condition 4 speaks to the waiver, we would like to have the waiver on the sidewalk to have it on one side of Ralston and Commercia! Avenue. Site specific condition 4, we would like to request that the landscaping along Locust Grove and Pine Street be placed in an easement and the maintenance of that landsc~e easement be by the individual lot owner rather than in a designated common lot. The reason for that is this particular development we have no cause or reason to form a business owners association and we would like not to do that. Site specific condition 7 where the City Engineer spoke about the common lot for the sewer lines along the south edge of the boundary of the project. We would like to discuss this further with the City Engineer and see if we can't have some sort of exclusive easement right for the City and keep that on private property. We may suggest that maybe limit the use of that property to either emergency vehicle access or possibly parking and restrict any storage or building use. Again we don't want to have to form a homeowners association to maintain the common lots that would be an unreasonable request. (End of Tape) Lee: Well that concludes my presentation, I would entertain any questions that you may have at this time. Johnson: Questions of the applicant from the commissioners? Hepper: Gary I had a question on these site specific comments from Shari Stiles and Bruce • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 9, 1996 Page 29 Freckleton, #4 states that a 20 foot planting strip would be required. It says as residential properties abut this subdivision 20 foot planting strips are required adjacent to existing residential properties to the north and the west of the subdivision. Do you agree with putting a 20 foot planting strip down the west side? Lee: That would be the residential house that is on the comer I suppose you are speaking of? Hepper: Well to the west of your project woul~'t that be Forrey? Lee: Well there is a jog in the parcel and there is an existing home situated on Pine Street. Yes you are correct in stating that part of it adjoins Wayne Forrey's property. Oslund: Their's is right here, Forrey's is right here. Just a little clarification once again, Forrey's property is to the west of your property. Lee: Starting on the northwest corner of Lot 2 that is correct. Although that piece west of Lot 1 is owned by a third party and there is a house on that property now. Hepper: (Inaudible) 20 foot landscape strip down the west side, apparently it says, because those are both residential, Forrey's would also be residential. Lee: I did have a conversation with Wayne. Forrey and his comment to me at the time was he is planning on some landscape buffering on his development. He wasn't going to make any undo hardships on future developments along this already approved industrial area. Hepper: That is kind of what I was. getting at was if you had worked anything out to accommodate each other or just see that Shari's request is met. Lee: I guess we would probably like to entertain that portion line along the west boundary of Lot 1 which is a single family residence, there is a fair amount of separation between the boundary and his home at present by his own property. His property is an industrial zone. Oslund: So let's say that again then, along Lot 1 and Block 2 you are not proposing to landscape. Lee: No Oslund: How about along Blocks 2, 3, 5 of Block, I am sorry Lot 2, 3 and 5 of Block 2? • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission Apri 19, 1996 Page 30 Lee: No, no plans for landscaping there. Oslund: I guess I would, the fact that Wayne has come in and is proposing a residential, basically a residential development to your west, somebody is going to have to put something in there and buffer. It seems to me that since Wayne was in here a little earlier, the only thing that seems logical is that this particular application you would be required to put the buffering even though he beat you only by 30 days. Lee: This is all industrial use in this area. Hepper: I believe that Wayne testified and we could ask him that he testified before that he would be willing to put in the required buffering so as not to place a hardship on the industrial that was previously there before his property. So I guess before we go too much farther we need to maybe get a comment from Wayne on this too. Johnson: Any other questions of Mr. Lee? MacCoy: I do, you don't have any problem with item 10, a note will be placed on the final plat that states no direct access will be allowed to Pine and Locust Grove, are your plans to be all internal? Lee: Yes, that is fine, that is correct. MacCoy: ACRD will have their statement I am sure, but I just think it is good policy to maintain internal, you don't end up with a problem. Lee: We agree MacCoy: You had shown your drawing here JUB Engineering drawing that you have a 58 foot right of way, what set that? Lee: That is the ACRD revised policy for collector streets. MacCoy: For 58 not 60? Lee: That is correct, it will have the same size street within that right of way as it always has and that will be 41 feet back to back. Johnson: Anything else Malcolm? MacCoy: No, that covers mine, Gary and Shari have covered most of them. • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 9, 1996 Page 31 Oslund: I have got another, you kind of peaked my interest when we mentioned about the lots. Block 2 and Lot 1 and Block 1 those lots abutting East Pine. If you want to create a 20 foot landscaping easement there rather than a common parcel to affect the landscaping improvements. I guess I wonder, I understand what you are trying to achieve there. What is the easement, what is the purpose of the easement. Could you just make that one ownership lot? Lee: Well it would be a -specific site easement on that lot for landscaping. And the CC&R's should address those two lots as being required to have landscaping in that easement. Oslund: Easements from who to who? I guess I don't understand. Lee: Well I guess since it is a City requirement the easement should be for the benefit of the City so it is part of their beautification of the entry into the City of Meridian. Or it could be for the beneficial use of the lot owners in the subdivision, either one. Oslund: That seems a little peculiar to me, because they are not really, the other, I don't see what the benefit is to the other. If you are going to do that it seems to me you just make it again a common ownership parcel and just go ahead and do it the way we have seen it on others. I guess and maybe it is directed more to Wayne, if we try to do something like that, in other words create some landscaping upfront that none of the other parcels have any involvement in does that make a case at all for possibly improving all of these parcel under the preliminary plat and then putt~g lots 1 and 1 along East Pine Street of the conditional use permit. I don't see how we have any control if we approve the preliminary plat with this kind of arrangement. I don't see how we Crookston: The concern is going to be who is going to take care of that landscaping. Oslund: Or that it gets done, how do we know that it will get done, I guess it what I am asking. We trust you guys, don't get us wrong. Lee: Well I guess our point of view is really the only people that are going to benefit from that lot or that landscape easement won't be the users in the development. It is not a common open space area for them to enjoy necessarily. And then you have only got 2 landowners to get after for landscaping maintenance or whatever the City may see fit rather than 13. Oslund: I agree, 1 guess I just don't see the purpose of the easement there because when you grant an easement you are granting something to somebody so they and they pay something to receive that benefit. I see those two parcels, if an owner, a particular owners wants to dress up frontage maybe that is something that they would like. • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 9, 1996 Page 32 Lee: Well maybe we should handle that in the CC&R's then to make those restrictions on those two lots and those along Locust Grove. (Inaudible) 20 feet landscaping and you can be specific on what you want, so many trees, so much in the way of shrubs and so on and so forth. Oslund: Well if we were to approve the preliminary plat with a condition or not a condition but the fact that we would show that there was some landscaping up front what is the process for affirming that is going to happen? Johnson: Shari Stiles would you like to address the landscaping issue if you would at this point (inaudible). Stiles: Chairman Johnson and Commissioners I believe this came up in the Valley Center Subdivision, I am not sure how that ended up whether they required an easement or a lot. I believe Mr. Morrow was quite specific that he wanted a lot. The main concern is consistency of the landscaping that it fit as one unit and that it be done prior to any building on the rest of the plat so that planting strip which is intended as a buffer for the residential across the street be in place prior to do any construction on the lot. I think that they could probably handle it with probably a note on the final plat and in the covenants that I believe the Council can make the condition that landscaping be construct prior to beginning any construction on any portion of the plat. Johnson: Is that a similar case where only two of 13 lots owners would benefit from the easement or was it a situation where the landscaping area ran the length of the project or do you recall specifically. Is it really similar to what we are talking about here? Stiles: It is somewhat similar, they had much more frontage on Overland Road. There is really nothing across the street from them and also i# was a new annexation. This property has been annexed for many years and we cannot require a development agreement as part of the plat. Johnson: If as Mr. Lee suggests they handle this through the CC&R's do you~think that would be acceptable to you, do you think that would be acceptable to the City Council? Stiles: I think that if the maintenance is handled through the CC&R's I still do believe that it should be constructed as part of the initial improvements. Johnson: And your hammer on that, your leverage on that to satisfy Commissioner Oslund is what? Stiles: Prior to their getting a signature on the final plat they would need to bond for those .;y~ • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 9, 1996 Page 33 improvements. Johnson: Or do the improvements. Stiles: Right Johnson: And Gary do you have any comments regarding Shari Stiles' comments? Lee: No, I really don't think that is a concern. I think our biggest concern was forming an association and having a corporation formed just to take care of landscaping. Johnson: I can see where you wouldn't want to do that (inaudible) and I don't think that is appropriate either. I wonder if there is a better way of handling it. As long as you have the signature or development agreement or something (inaudible) seems to me we could be satisfied it would be completed because that seems. to be Commissioner Oslunds Concern that it will get done even though he trusts you guys. Mr. Forney, since your name came up in vain here several times would you make yourself available please so we could ask you a couple of questions. Wayne Forney, 3045 Thayen Place, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Forney: Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, I met some time ago with Mike Ford who is an executive with Ron Yanke Company. I committed to Mr. Ford that on our project our retirement center campus we would build a lot of landscaping and quality screening and fencing and it would not be necessary to ask them to do any of that work. I made that same commitment to Gary Lee I think on two occasions. Our project abuts only a portion, my entire property is the west boundary here except for the home on Pine. The elderly campus is toward the north part of my property. So I am not asking for a special landscape strip we will provide that ourself we will self buffer and screen. I don't think it is appropriate to ask these gentlemen to do it, we are pertectly happy without it. Johnson: Any other questions of Mr. Forney or any .other questions? In other words you told us what we wanted to hear. Thank you Wayne I appreciate it. Is there anyone else from the public or does the applicant still (inaudible). Lee: I am finished unless there are some questions? Johnson: Thank you Gary, any other people in the audience that would like to address the Commission on this application. No further comments Mr. Lee? I will close the public hearing at this time. This would require findings of fact and conclusions of law. _ ... 5._.. ~~~ • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 9, 1996 Page 34 Oslund: I thought it was just a plat? Johnson: You are right it is just a plat, sorry about that, recommendation. Hepper: Mr. Chairman, I move that we recommend approval on the preliminary plat. MacCoy: Second Johnson: Commissioner Hepper motions for Malcolm MacCoy, all those in favor? Opposed? approval, seconded by Commissioner MOTION CARRIED: All Yea FIVE MINUTE RECESS ITEM #12: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PHOTOGRAPHIC PORTRAIT STUDIO BY BERTON & DEANNA SPENCER: Johnson: At this point I will open the public hearing and invite the applicant or the applicant's representative to address the Commission. Berton Spencer, 213 E. 3rd, was sworn by the City Attorney. Spencer: Originally when we began this process and what we determined was really uite a process what we would basically need is we need a place to do some photographic portraits. The main thing that we are considering is for like seniors and at this location there wouldn't be more than one possibly two seniors there at a time. It is going to be ve limited. The other thing would be interviewing and discussing wedding plans with brides should we do weddings. Most of our work is done on site. For instance working with seniors on the green belt, environmental type work. We originally made the application for the enclosing the car port for a photographic studio and I saw that there were several questions and comments with regard to that. Basically how we feel at this particular time is that anything that if you don't want to enclose it we won't enclose it. I have also noticed that there are also some concerns about a sign and that sort of thing. This would be an appointment only sort of situation that we would like to have at this location. I am not sure at this particular time if an accessory use permit might be a better thing than a full conditional use permit but we would just like to state that any, we would be more than willing to work with the Commission on any way it would allow us to be able to do this. Johnson: Thank you Mr. Spencer, any questions from the Commissioners to the Applicant? i I i MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: APRIL 9 1996 APPLICANT: RONALD YANKE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 11 REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR RAILSIDE SUBDMSION NCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS "REVIEWED" SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS c~Jr 1' /~~ ~I~ OTHER: AI! Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. • ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT Development Services Division Development Application Report Preliminary Plat -Railside Industrial Park Pine Road and Locust Grove Road Meridian Railside Industrial Park is a 13-lot industrial subdivision on 23''`-acres. The site is located at the southwest corner of Pine Avenue and Locust Grove Road extended.. This development is estimated to generate additiona12,850 vehicle trips per day based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation manual. Roads impacted by this development: Pine. Avenue Locust Grove Road ACHD Commission Date -April 10, 1996 - 7:00 p.m. ~ U ~ 1. 0 SITE in a~ U O Franklin J ~' ~ ca o N ~ ~ W E S • _~ J Q O Z Z O f~ _s m W _J Q ~~ O~ 5 ~ir/ ~,, 0 0 so II w J Q U N 6 6r li, .1 . \ ;I .t(t-tlt-.ot • I 1~1A AtlrNIWIl3tlA t - - ivf OU ICC IiYK _ lj yi _ ]n. ]n. OOP~(~lM MillOf Ot[ W ° 2 2 I ~ ;I ~~~I Stl33NIJN3 9'fl'f Q8(~S ~(dlalS(laNl 341S11Vb ~-r3, ° o I ~F i , ~ ti i ~ 1 s t ~ ~: ~i~ 1 =i$~q~' r~b~ °S lit 1~~ d,~ ~I~t`' ~~{~ ~ '~ ~ ~~ F~ ~, ~ ~- 6 Y r ~a i € s Ft R~ ~i u3~ ,; t ii ~ ~~ WAN r ~ j t ~ ~9 8 0 6 ~ x~ ~~ I ~~( Np~ f a } ! ~ ~ f 3 ! i ; F b~ 1 ~8 S o I ~,~ ~ ~a: ~; t 3 _ n. ~~3t~~l~~ls~~~ ~i ilb~ gg lil~lti5 . I !0 I~~II ~ ~- r~ ~i ~~ ~ ~ ~ I Illlt ~ Y Y~ ! Y st F; a~ ,,tl~, ,,1~ ~ i. i~ } ~, ,~ ~, ~ ~Id ~~i ii~ i~:ft~ ~i~t t j~ is . t~ ~t i~ Z . _ s _ 2no2t~ J.snoo'i ~2l9~.J- m0'I ~ fi+oisr~x~ ~~~Iln~ ~ ~~ ~- ~ O31YW9/i1~ifOT _ -- ----' _ .~__ ___~______ ~ 3610 .~ Y ~ I - 1 ~~ ~~ ; t- - _. a ,_ _ ~ -~ . j I _ _.. ~_ I L I I ____ ___. r ~ I ~3 ---_-- -_------------- .~ i~h X ~ ~ ~ .r a _ ...._ - ' i ~l ~ ---'~ N ~' ,I ... _ .. +--~ ~ -------~-f---- i09t I ~ ' ~ ~;. - ; . -_ z rtztm-~ - - - - I II ~3r-./ ~ ., ~ ~ ate ~ ;'; ~ - ~ .p .., 8~ °~at ~° a $as ~.6g ~a o ,.vtiry ~r~^ 1 I~ t a • Facts and Findings: A. General Information I-L -Existing zoning 22.82 -Acres 13 -Proposed building lots 0 -Square feet of existing building 1,650 -Total lineal feet of proposed public streets (apprax} 269 -Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) West Ada -Impact Fee Benefit Zone Western Cities -Impact Fee Assessment District Pine Avenue Collector street with bike lane designation Traffic count 1,515 an 2/9/95 680-feet of frontage 50 to 55-feet existing right-of-way (25-feet south of centerline) 52-feet required right-of-way south of sectionline Pine Avenue is improved with 27-feet of pavement with curb, gutter and sidewalk on the north side of the street only. Locust Grove Minor arterial with bike lane designation No traffic count available 1,170-feet of frontage 0-feet existing right-of--way 96-feet required right-of--way (48-feet from ultimate street centerline) Locust Grove is improved north of Pine Avenue with 35-feet of pavement with curb, gutter and sidewalk only on the west side. B. The site is undeveloped. The site is bordered by Pine Avenue on the north, Locust Grove Road extended on the east, the Oregon Short Line Railroad on the south, and unplatted land on the west with an existing dwelling on Pine Avenue. C. Locust Grove Road is planned to extend south of Pine Street to Franklin Road in a straight alignment along the east side of this site. The applicant is not proposing access to the planned extension of Locust Grove Road. All of the lots in the subdivision can be accessed by the internal streets. When Locust Grove Road is improved in the future, Commercial Avenue will intersect Locust Grove Road. In the meantime, the subdivision can operate with the internal streets connecting to Pine Avenue. A temporary paved turnaround with a temporary easement to the District will be required at the east end of Commercial Avenue until Locust Grove Road is improved. RAILSIDE. WPD Page 2 In accordance with Dis• t policy, staff recommends that the •l' pp scant be required to provide a $5,850.00 deposit to the Public Rights-of--Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing a 5- foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel (approximately 1,170- feet) prior to issuance of any required permits or District approval of a fmal plat, whichever occurs first. D. Pine Avenue abutting this site is not listed in the District's current Five Year Work Program. The Pine/Executive Corridor Report states that 90-feet of right-of--way is needed for this segment of Pine Avenue. The north right-of-way,,line has already been established with the platting of Maws Addition No.l (a single-family residential development). The City of Meridian will require a 20-foot wide buffer strip along Pine Avenue. Staff recommends that the applicant dedicate 52-feet of right-of--way south of the section line on Pine Street and construct the sidewalk in an easement in the;20-foot .wide buffer strip. E. The applicant is proposing to stub Commercial Avenue to the site's west boundary. Staff supports this stub street. A temporary paved turnaround with a temporary easement to the District will be required at the west end of Commercial Avenue. The north-south road, Ralstin Street is proposed''to intersect'Pine Avenue aligned with Ralstin Street in Maws Addition No.l Subdivision. F. In accordance with District policy, staff recommends that the applicant be required to construct the streets within the subdivision with curb, gutter, 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks, and a 41-foot street section within a 58-foot right-of--way prior to issuance of any required permits or :District approval of a final plat, whichever occurs first. G. Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. If the driveway is not to be paved on site, staff recommends that the applicant pave the driveway its full required width of 30 to 40-feet to at least 30-feet beyond the sidewalk. H. The transportation system will be adequate to accommodate the additional traffic generated by this proposed development. This application is scheduled for a public hearing by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission on Apri12, 1996. The following requirements are provided as conditions for approval: Site Specific Requirements: Dedicate 52-feet of right-of--way from the sectionline of Pine Avenue abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of--way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone. If the owner wishes to be paid for the additional right-of--way, the owner RAILSIDE.WPD Page 3 • • must submit a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance, with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #188. 2. Dedicate 48-feet of right-of--way from the ultimatestreet centerline of Locust Grove Road extended abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. The owner will be compensated.. for this additional right-of--way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone. If the owner wishes to be paid for the additional right-of--way, the owner must submit a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance, «~ith Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #188. Construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk abutting the parcel on Pine Avenue within an easement to the District. The easement shall be recorded and the instrument number shall be noted on the final plat. The north edge of the sidewalk shall be at least 5-feet south of the future curb location. A 70-foot street section as measured from the existing back of curb on the north side of Pine Avenue will be constructed by the District at a future date. 4. Provide a $5,850.00 deposit to the Public Rights-of--Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel (approximately 1,170-feet) prior to issuance of any required permits or District approval of a final plat, whichever occurs. first. 5. Ralstin Street shall align with Ralstin Street in Maws Addition No.l Subdivision. 6. Commercial Avenue extend from the right-of--way for Locust Grove Road to the west boundary of the site with a temporary easement for a paved turnarounds at the site's east and west boundaries. 7. All internal public streets shall be constructed with curb, gutter, 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on both sides and a 41-foot street section within 58-foot right-of--way. 8. Driveways shall be located a minimum of 50-feet from any intersection, as measured near edge of driveway to back of curb. 9. Driveways shall be a minimum of 30-feet wide and a maximum of 40-feet wide, paved a minimum of 30-feet beyond the back of sidewalk. Shared driveways are encouraged. 10. Restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, as required by District policy, shall be placed on future development of this parcel. 11. Direct lot or parcel access to Locust Grove Road and Pine Avenue is prohibited. Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. Standard Requirements: RAILSIDE.WPD Page 4 1. A request for modifica n, variance or waiver of any requirem~t or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the Development Services Supervisor. Th~ e req ~PSt .hall specifically identify each requirement to be recon idered and ;nrlnctP a written e~cplanatinn of Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. _on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. After Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Development Services Supervisor within two days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $lI0.Q0. The reque~r fir rP~~n~;~PTar;., hall specifically identify each requirement to be reco sidere and include written documentati n of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of it original decision The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. 3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #188, also known as, Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. Aright-of--way permit must be obtained from ACHD for any street or utility construction within the public right-of--way. Utility cuts should be combined where practical to limit pavement damage. Utility street cuts in road paved wit in the tat five years will not be allowed unless approved by the District Co mission Contact Construction Services at 345- 7667 (with file number) for details. 5. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and appropriate action by ACHD prior to District approval of the final plat or issuance of building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. The proposed drainage system shall retain all storm water on-site and shall conform to the requirements of the city or county having jurisdiction. Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the public right-of--way or in a common lot owned by a homeowners association set aside specifically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, or other valuable amenities placed in said easement. Drainage lots and their use restrictions shall be noted on the plat (when applicable). 6. Locate driveways a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot property lines when driveways are not to be shared with the adjacent property. RAILSIDE. WPD Page 5 • 7. If sidewalk is to be constructed or is currently abutting the site, construct pedestrian ramps on the corner of all street intersection in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 40-1335. 8. Dedicate up to a 20-foot x 20-foot right-of--way triangle (or appropriate curve) to keep street improvements within the public right-of--way at alT intersections abutting .and/or within the development by means recordation of the final plat or prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. 9. Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across parcel........ 10. Continue borrow ditch drainage abutting parcel (culvlrrt may be required). 11. Provide written approval from the appropriate irrigation/drainage district authorizing storm runoff into their system. 12. If street improvements are required, locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drainage ditches and appurtenances, etc.) outside of the public right-of--way. Authorization for relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. If determined by the District, existing irrigation facilities may remain in the right-of--way with District review and approval of easements recorded for future relocation at a later date. 13. Locate proposed sign(s) out of the public right-of--way and out of the clear-vision sight- triangle of all street and driveway intersections. 14. Install a stop sign on every unsignalized approach of a project street to an intersection involving a collector or arterial as the cross-street. The stop sign shall be installed when the project street is first accessible to the motoring public. 15. The developer is required to install street name signs at the locations approved by the Ada County Highway District. Purchase street name signs, sign poles, and mounting hardware from ACHD's Traffic Operations Department or an approved outside supplier. The District will not manufacture street signs until a copy of the recorded plat showing the recording data has been provided to Development Services staff. 16. Any portion of a street which is required by the District to be designated as "no parking" shall be posted by the installation of standard "no parking" signs. A signing plan shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer and submitted to ACHD Traffic Services staff for their review and approval prior to final plat approval by the District. If a final plat is not required, the signing plan approval shall be completed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permit). 17. Provide a clear vision sight triangle at all driveway and street intersections. Within this triangle no obstruction higher than 36-inches above the top of pavement will be allowed, including but not limited to landscaping, berms, fences, walls or shrubs. The triangle shall be defined with the long leg measured 200-feet to 540-feet (depending on speed limit) along the centerline of any road; and the short leg measured from the curb line of the road 20-feet RAILSIDE.WPD Page 6 along the centerline o~ intersecting driveway or street (see ~trict Policy Figure F7). Provide notes of these restrictions on the plat site plan and street construction plans. 18. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District for review and appropriate action. 19. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for review and appropriate action by ACRD. 20. All public streets and drainage systems shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and policies. 21. Specifications, land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACHD shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54-1215. 22. The applicant shall submit revised-plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required .permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 23. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 24. The connection of driveways to the public street system is not allowed without approval of the District. To obtain approval, anyone proposing to construct a driveway is required to contact the Construction Services Division of the District to obtain a proper permit prior to commencing construction per District Policy 7207.9. 25. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 26. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless awaiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. Submitted by: Date of Commission Approval• RAILSIDE.WPD Page 7 ,~ • • Development Services Staff RAILSIDE.WPD Page 8 ~ ~ ~F~~,.,~ a SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET d.~'~, ~ 4 1y9 ~~~ rr~ iLIEF~l~I~,s Proposed Development Name RAILSIDE INDUSTRIAL SUB City MERIDIAN Date Reviewed 3/28/96 Preliminary Stage XXXXX Final Engineer/Developer J-U-B Engr Inc /Ronald Yanke The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Boise City Strut Name Ordinance. "E PINE AVENUE` "N LOCUST GR OVE ROAD" "E COMMERCI AL E'L- ST~ 2 f ~T " N RALSTIN - ~ yLN y~ The street sho~~~n on the plat as N ORTH LOCUS T GROVE (FUT URE) is in alignment with the xi ing LOCUST GROVE ROAD that is north of it but is par allel t o the existing LOCUST rROVF ROAD that iswes~ of it Either the name of this. section of road needs to have a new The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMM Ada County Engineer Ada Planning Assoc. City of Meridian Meridian Fire District John Priester Terri Raynor Representative Representative ~PRESENTATIVES OR DESIGNEES Date ~ ~' Date a-~ Date 3 -28''9 Ol~l~-~` Date 3 -- Z ~-- y ~i NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be prese~ed to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat w~ not be signed !!!! Sub Index Street Index 3N 1 E U7_ Section NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS '~ ' G .i ~~ ~~'