The URL can be used to link to this page

Lake at Cherry Lane, The No. 6 PP. ~ WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., Clty Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" CORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place IEo Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public Works/Building DepartmenE (208) 887-2211 Motor Vehicle/Drivets License (208) 888-4443 GRANT P. KINCSFORD Mayor COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW P & Z COMMISSION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman MOE ALIDJANI JIM SHEARER CHARLIE ROUNTREE TIM HEPPER TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning 8< Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: January 2, 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 12/18/95 HEARING DATE: 1/9/96 REQUEST: Preliminary Plat for The Lake at Cherry Lane No 6 Subdivision BY: Steiner Development LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Immediately east of the Lake at Cherry Lane No. 3 Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z GREG OSLUND, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z BOB CORRIE, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C GLENN BENTLEY, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANN~IG ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: DEC 1 9 1995 CITY pF ~~I~1D-AN • , REG~UEST FvR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PRELIMINARY PLAT AND/OR FINAL PLAT PLANNI;~1G AND ZONING COMMISSION TIME TASLE Fi7R ~UBMISSIG~i: A •request fo'r preliminary plat apps•aval must be in the City Clerks passessian no later than three days follawing the regular meeting o= the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and moaning Commission will hear the request at the mar,thly meeting following the month the •request was made. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received bef ore 5:~d0 P. M., Thursday following the Planning and Zoning Commission action. GENERAL INFGRMATION 1. Name of Anne:tation and Subdivision. The Lake at Cherry Lane #~y 2. General Location, 40 acre site immediately east of The Lake at Cherry Lane #3 3. Owners of record, Bill & .Viola '"eter Address, 2201 N. Allumbaucth ,Zip83704Telephone 376-8465 Boise, ID 4. Applicant, Steiner Development Address,PO Box 190472, BoiGP, TD L.L.C. 83719 5. Engineer, Tom Eddy R.L.S. Firm Power Engineers Address 290 T1. Maple Grove Rd.Zip83704 Telephone 378-6380 6. Name and address to receive City billings: Name Douq Campbell Steiner Dev. Address PO Box 190472 Telephone 884-2076 oise, ID 83719 PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres l-9-~1 q ~7 2. Humber of lots 52 S/F detached dwelling; 1 recreation center 3. Lots per acre 5.20 per dwelling unit 4. Density per acre 5.30 5. Zoning Classification(s) R-15 - R-4 • • E,. If the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridian City Limits but within the jurisdictional mile, what is the e:tisting zoning classification R-15 7. Does the plat border a potential green belt No $. Have recreational easements been provided for Yes 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City No Explain 10. Are there proposed dedications of common areas? Yes Explain Private open spaces, recreation center, pool For future parks? Yes Explain Private recreation area 11. What schoolts) service the area Meridian do you propose any agreements for future school sites No , Explain 12. Other proposed amenities to the City Yes Water Supply Extension of Main Fire Department Donate Fire Station site Other _ . Explain Fire Department has approved of this site for a donation 23. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial or combination) Residential 14. Type of Dwellingts) Single Family, Duplexes, Multiplexes, other Single family detached 15. Proposed Development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot t s) , 46 40 b. Minimum square footage of structure(s) 1301 c. Are garages provides for, Yes square footage 2 car d. Are other coverings provided for e. Landscaping has been provided for Yes,. Describe Extensive landscapina in road intersection and along mPn nrt;iA a.,.a throughout. the residential common areas. t2) l ..: . ~ f. Trees will be provided for Yes Trees will be maintained Private company g. Sprinkler systems are provided for Yes h. Are there multiple units Yes Type Single family remarks Detached senior/adult living i. Are there special set back requirements Yes . Explain Garage setback 18' ~. Has off street parking been provided for Yes . Explain Normal off-street parking k. Value-range of property Homes $110.000 and up 1. Type of financing for development Conventional m. Protective covenants were submitted No .Date forthcoming 16. Does the proposal land lock other property No Does it create Enclaves No STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Streets, curbs gutters and side to standards as required by Ada Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions City Engineer. All sidewalks width. 2. Proposed use is in canf ormance Comprehensive Plan. valks are to be constructed County Highway District and will be determined by the will be five (5) feet in with the City of Meridian 3. Development will connect to City services. 4. Development will comply with City Ordinances. 5. Preliminary Plat will include all appropriate easements. 6. Street names must not conflict with City grid system. t3) THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. l~4 SUBDIVISION Preliminary Plat Application -Statements of Compliance 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalls are to be coastivcted to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. Steiner Development will comply with Statement No. 1. Development will be a planned unit development under a Conditional Use Permit. All streets will be private but will meet all standards. 2. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Yes -Steiner Development will comply with Statement No. 2. 3. Development will connect to City services. Yes -Steiner Development will comply with Statement No. 3. 4. Development wiR comply with City Ordinances. Yes -Steiner Development will comply with Statement No. 4. 5. Preliminary Plat will include all appropriate easements. Yes -Steiner Development will comply with Statement No. 5. 6. Street names must not conflict with City grid system. Yes -Steiner Development will comply with Statement No. 6. Z`~:' ~: 111 V1if u 1 ` w If .~ _.:. -`-,.= !l•~ ~ 1 i •~ I '~ 1 ~ ~h ~ \ w l ~ ~ )~ i ~ [ J ~ I ~ • u ,,~~ a~ .•~ ~. .~.. 1 ~ I ~~ • ~+~ t l . ~~.. _.. - ~ ,., ~ .-± ] r~.f ~' „•~. ~/~'~/S f ' ' ~ !- a1 F • ~ 1 \ ~ + F A ~ . - • _ _ / . `7' ^ ~'• I ~ 1 i~ !~ _~ `J / + _ ~ • i ~ 1 7~Y/ ~~ ~ 1 71~ \ ~ /'~ ~y7 •~~ l ~ ~_ it I Y J ,~ 1 1 { w ( } ( ( _ R'~ ~ iN ~~ ~ ~ ~! ~ ~ ~~ ! ~/ ~ f f ~ 1(~~ ~~1( ~ ~ '~ Lll ~I/"" 1 a- /~~' ~ i,./''~ t T ~ ,n ~ _ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ©~ r ~'' ~~- v ~ ~- p -, ~ ~ vn w31 •~sl~t•.r~~ 1~ ~ ' ~ ~ I ~i ~A ;._ - ._ ~ li~i 'L ' i , ! s~ ~ ~ i f l !'~ : ' I i , w i ~~ ~ ' t'1 SIG W ~~ Eli -~ ~a~ `w a % • .~ .~ --~ • i 1_ Y ~ •~Ia ~`-- -- ~,._..,,~..•~rii •~•I~l.•I J.f.!•1' ~I .. ~.. I ~'! . I . I . I I 1 ~--~-~ ~~ t _____1 ~ i l t l l' 11' ~ t -~~.. .~I. !.!•1.1.1.1__! T'T'®~_ t O_ ~i(\`/ • 1;" ~ -~.~- % •.1~-~I ~~~ -~La~ . --~:~ I •« ~A I E' It _ ~~ 290 North Maple Grove Road Boise, ID 83704 (208) 378-6380 Fax 1208) 378-0025 PROJECT: 527153 DATE: December 15, 1995 A~1AComE~ H DESCRIl'TION FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE N0.6 A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER SECTION 3 T.3N., R.1W., B.M. MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO A parcel of land being a portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 3, T.3N., R.1 W., B.M., Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a Brass cap marking the Southeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, T.3N., R.1 W., B.M., Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, thence along the Southerly boundary of the.said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, North 88°55'29" West 45.00 feet to a point marking a point on the Westerly right-of--way of N. Ten Mile Road, and marking a point on the Northerly boundary of Cherry Lane Village No. 5 Subdivision as filed for record in the office of the Ada County Recorder, Boise, Idaho, in Book 69 of Plats at Pages 7033 and 7034, said point also being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said Southerly boundary and along said Northerly boundary North 88°55'29" West 723.68 feet to a point: thence leaving said Southerly and Northerly boundaries North 0°19'15" East 95.01 feet to a point; thence North 11°39'01" West 20.50 feel to a point; thence North 04°20'56" West 281. IS feet to. a point; thence North 00°26'04" East 137.33 feet to a point marking a point of curve; thence along a curve to the left 156.57 feet. said curve having a central angle of 08°37'32", a radius of 1040.00 feet. tangents of 78.-13 feet, and a long chord of 156.42 feet bearing North 81°47'22" East to a point marking a point of tangent: thence North 77°28'36" East 92.50 feet to a point marking a point of curve; thence along a curve to the right 216.69 feet, said curve having a central angle of 12°55'58", a radius of 960.00 feet, tangents of 108.31 feet. and a long chord of 216.23 feet bearing North 83°56'35" East to a point marking a point of tangent: thence South 89°35'26" East 271.66 feet to a point marking a point of curve; thence along a curve to the right 31.42 feet, said curve having a central angle of 90°00'00", a radius of 20.OU feet, tangents of 20.Ot1 feet, and a long chord of 28.28 feet bearing South 44°35'26" East to a point marking a point of tangent, also said point marking a point on the Westerly right-of--way of N. Ten Mile Road; Pacific Land Surveyors, a division of POWER Engineers, Inc., an Idaho Corporation C7 • thence along said Westerly right-of--way South 00°24'34" West 589.48 feet to the point of beginning, comprising 9.97 acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO: All existing easements and road rights-of--way of record or appearing on the above-described parcel of land. Prepared by: DGP/beb Don G. Payne, P.L.S. Pacific Land Surveyors ~ ! ~rrAt,1~~••r 8 I, William Teter, do hereby certify that I am the. record owner of the }and described as the "Lake at Cherry Lane ~5 Subdivision" in an application for Preliminary Plat being submitted to the City of Meridian for consideration. Dated this da o , 19 95-- By: - William Teter F ~ p`. ci~oo S~3~r k STATE OF IDAHO ) ss. County of Ada ) ON THIS l day of ~~~ e.~,. .c , 19 ~5 , before me a notary public in and for said State, personally appeared GU,'//,`,~,,. T.~Tr/1 known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that -executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. My Notary Commission Expires a~G~ ~ ~ ~~ 1~~~G G My Notary Bond riOTAn y -o-- Notary Public for 1'iahoG~~ Residing at ~y ,Idaho ~•' :1 ii ~~_ '~ _• "~ ' • • __ ".i . !Ul F. T10:• ESTtTE_,OF ~• •.~ , -_ ~•'~ i ' •~ •'s..'. Mi.•.... •• ~~CORD• •l.l.T8TE1t~• _ .:~• i• - .• •• ~M • ' .. ~ Q.. : ~ .•• ~~:'t NY•.~•. ~: jff:~. • •! •-~• ! . t. • •~ .r .. ~" ;3ic .. ~,; '~.' :• : _~ ~.•' ')~~-••• •_1• r ELM V, ''_ ;~ _ '•.!~ •' ~ . ..•; ti . ~R; ;,L'secutoc' c •..:~: fairs•.~Ot ! ~~- •~ '-. ~"~• ~-~ _ ,: ` -~, dee6~iieil tiav ;` J ~.• : c D • ~' . .•-, ~: ~ ~ :.• :lt -`'`'~ ;;! s.tit~`d'.. •~~ oa:~tlie.. .~"oC"• -• - ='•.1963' ~ ~ :~' l_ .1•, ~ .• red'~ot• eet,Lie• •iad tLled~! •c t~~Ca~s=~~{~ ~~' =.~ ~~ :!~. tStia'l•'accbuiic~aiici'reFoct'Of•,hil-•ics tart do ••~-: 7 ,•• •ti•~~:~. ~~. a i4 cLtf ~f•.aiil:;~esta't ~ • •• , ~-: •_ _ ee litiwi•a~ for s••t, i ~leoxn@ !-. _ • { a;:.•.~. ~ ~ . - !'!' •acrouot ;f ied nll ~eticion~~ :~qa c' a lyj.v{Lli.;.aide •~ :.._~ Y' ~~•;'-_ •`~. fi - i:.~- -~ >'.'d~~tr S toa;dt.~tlsi*: eic ;;r_•~ .''~` `.: • ' `LP.tid• ' i.• '•td~•aeeOtaiC' ~~~•-idb~:cnia_ ,. • . ~ •~~••~• •1 .,; , .. . ! .bad :c ~ coalios• oe :' •• ~^ ::.~:i ~;,::••~•reiiilar=p •Ca• ~lseara u i:oa •j>~. ~- - . jj •~ .. •~ : ;ti to':ot:~bi._' t' 9 f' lal.biau'at ::cb:LSe:'aat•Lpfacti n•Y ~'~_'r'.s."1'(..,,'c: .ot"la tt'~ ti0ti~j~l: ~~idij~tlopo~i "• •!il+r:-iatttaroc~ j '•; ^•..~~ .:` .~ ld . fouac;aad,l~enett~6;•o sid:Petiti0o •. :•~g~dttly~~lw .~~ .L '•' '>''•i:i•.~ oQu3t~d•b~=1'av"apd•'c!'tl:ot ~t;-ofsthla~ ~t ;tatil'Yw. = .,;: . n-:+:.~, '~•ob)eet~loe a:vritln Lola i ! tiaa~lu { ~+eptt =~;, . ' 1G • i! : eeoaaiC' ' txa ,_ ;•~ f),i111o or! •l'<,•=l.std'sxacutor; ppii;Lai;"Gy: J ~t -~ .~a t;~;''~ =.ss~ '~.: ~C .:,. 1 ;~ id''it" •pei~ln~t:W. t!>t•_ ~`:1 aL~er' j ~ •' ~_• ~'_ '`• '~`~• =:~ •: •na~d:.'aeeouat•'na~ct+r. voncMrs'ft~la'a berils'• '~1i7•~!~t+ed•: :.`e- • .~ ~ ::; 't to fus+Port. a ceof,• eliae°~iiid IiSeo~iiitrl 'ltf~•ii .i+ia ~• •~:• j:J:~„ . --cor=eec;;•aisil~ be.,iu'id•:aeeoiiat • • o•eta` es'i,o•:•+e~d•: :.: :; .. lia .ehtitl~d `tQ:- .:seEClad' •Itlow - ,. ~', •i'i`.'': •eiid~aisproved• •ancl cl-t'.CO1lsC.'1t i •. •• •ts !: . .• • - :dp~r•~anSi r.d..ai~i:'cli: glace • :• ;ti. ~`: ~ ~ ~. -a:1~C~lZT(ic6ar•Elsi'•~f~.•fiaal;•`:'' '•= .j _~ '.'- ` •.ccbwt.oe•.a d:tl~e~:sA±+~,,l~~bi ~ .1'n~><1 •• . ~ • .%: ...• .-i•:•~~ _•.var=rans:ered asi.!_ newi;antGaS-;fo • ,.•itc`' ~ ••ssd~tad: ~sa~rr j•-'~- °..~+ .;~ ~~: = aa• il.ti:lid;: =R' •i: •:.::% ~:' rid}~ti ~, ., ..; ._ i~lowd.._ n1 • ~~ •~, _ ~ ;~~ :• : i~..•i>Vhl .. ,.- w. j~ T .;~. -~j. i~.^ Sys ..~}~ ^'•'-.!,'.s ~ ; (~ -• - - ~'• ., `-,' ;ura ~ + -~••' is ' w~ ;rvl'.L~}.'3}.i;. +«:. i ~7>i rf~ ..,. a'.~~°.a•~I' ''~-7'.,• '~flli't Y~~F~•:ar .~ ~ ~~. JI • `- ~ ~~i ;~.•.• ~! S • ,~:, iii.~t: Luttlia~ ' _. • •oQfai o~:iai'd~ =• = :.M ~~~' ~`~ "' _ ~..~wcco~ui sep~e ;~V t~}~ ~ea~•J<i~ri~~i -a. ~ •. .: j:: aecuto s ;ao: 21ikt]ao ~ '~ -`: ~ r• :» ,~ .~, ~=i' %!~~ :.I:=~:!` ;~h ~'.irdd'i: ''Llie=e 'v ,,,.~, ~1~a~rda~~- ...••,• ~M),~e "~::..:.:;.:. -•-- _"I~._ .. -- • -- - ~i_.. .. ' Siva isiilew.:~L:-•- • la:. s*s'••~ '~Qa.~~ ,(iKd~~ - •!''";~::: '•ti' a '.nd?.li•=~iL L'oti.iiti'oe~.'~: ~:". ` y` ;~_ 'And' tlidt• wppaa't'ia .» tip.:''' ~:..~~ ::.::':rr~r-=~: '^ .. ~' ~ ~ - •1Nr~ ;.. ,,~- . •1' •,,: • .. ..xl~T .' r: 't, ~ •~~'~It . .~ .~. f. .``' ~` ~ ~ w . :P l' ? ~.- :•~tiF•. ~ =~. . •~~~-• r-'J. ,••Sl~, -1 - , :,... ~~a. I;. • ~;•= ' r~• ~~~ _ _ . . :•lk~. t:~: t• 'a7~ ~•'s•~~~!: ;~ ;+~':. ~~ ~~ ^~. ~~~' .• i~ `' .~... ~~~ . • ?~ ;•• :~~.-: - • s..i•~r ~ . . „f a „~~`~ ~' '~ •'~'r>•~...~'~. .~ ..: 1.:; ' z. ~. ~;: .• ~~~• ~z .'' • ' _; ... - •••ti ~,•'I, • 1.1,. •~ Y '-: ~^ e4.:::: ~` • ~ s xs.:•.tY .~ . ;i :. y-•~ ~i.i i `•r+ `~ t ~ f•;•~. , • t'ysidw~• ~o! '~dj ~Cci.lit ~; ~':_ ~f :1.~ '! .. ; ; . f el M;.~. "'• ` ~: ~+ ~rW~. cb. •tolla-i i it~ ~ aC;lair~•.'eiiiljt .:~;. ~ ~•' ..2'!1a! al.l o~ thi- ~1r tt7-.':ot•t~1~ t ri' ~.~ • d+at{t /: 'via tlla 'en9'exa+ tjr r~n7-' bL:. ' . • 1.••:~1f : ~.~ : ait~il . tMlabaM j: aC ~t~'_ C!a>f of ~E•N • ~ . i :: ~ ~ clte;ciiis o•[.Ela.,•:iss~YLL;~~dn0'7 -~,. :}. :: •Taur~ uii.d; ~tt:.wie' o'rlQ.d~iC-~~ ;~: ,~~; •,~,. .w. Et ~d•and b.glitittty .~ Fta>[, ~aboi -qO / 1 ~ ~: -_ • • • 1:. ' ~~• Z.,,.ftK w~ •~ 1 , .•1i-~?~ a is _ ........" _ . _ . •~ ~• .. Q1arLiit::•Tltar. iad aei ' • " cilia-•= =.i•"~~~ •';': •l96]1in ds'Couner~'~~ahe•:aod~ttri o.ti(,' •tl~ flu: ,i. ~ .w .; :• ~. Ott :•:'•.~:~: :,~':.i. •;- .• J'.. -l 1.i. •..J_ti ~(.~.~•~ •~:•~,•cwiidw L:tti eel. eeof~C~• :doe ~::j :. •.y '~'prccletll ~rly•diea>?ibi~'.,u1d•n~.ritieu o:-t ~,:1.~ '_• :~.._~.j.z~clicor as tollave,: Co-v[E:• -'j:._"~:~- ;;1•'•'.'•j;:F•- ~4! I •1''h.:3L~ bf,t~ii•E~1t oq Saatioa a'':r~~~i16i ~~• - p •-.a[; .boisi ticridian,•' ia•;Ada ~Il~aty~ ~ti . • M : .•. 1' .1 :'• .L.:. • .• ~: •~ ~ ~ '~i/l •i1 011 1~1111~' ..~..~'I .:!• ;~. :`: '~: .f ~ 1 •~• ltteeellaneou+~• . '• !~ „•~•~ =. 1• ,. •i, ' i. ~~ ;aad any . tsch~.r PropicF .not oo>r •.diecori'r.d~ laRt ~•{"=` ~ !:~ w~ ~LelonY;.to tM..std •e.eite' ~t: •to.vtil;Ctt:•tlfa 'p1i `;' •7 ~. Sao' lac.r.ec •bs`a . -. -.,. r . ad ';ttie::are.-Ls•~-e;.b~=d att. ;.a-; :.. .~- ? ;•to-vit- •Zo:tlw"$11t~c.jotj •. •:.t: •,• tl. •I 1111x. ••~•~/:1:~• bL'=a- .ti.•. - •+ . ~ , is ~.{~ =-i.t,:= ~ • ;~2 a.wa, a.~ E~: • OE' y~ai ! t11aC, lay~'oi .lii~w . J :fir ii~iil~Lb~= ot; cl1~%• -~.. 1,- • ~`•. i ice. ~i • ~.l2q~n;:: .3. -~•.• I9 S ':.ti1dliDoel.t;Ea • NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., on January 9, 1996, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of Steiner Development, for a Preliminary Plat for land located in the SE 1/4, NE 1/4, NE 1/4 of Section 3, T.3N, R.1W, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is generally located immediately east of The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 3 Subdivision. Applicant requests Preliminary Plat approval of the parcel of land above described for 52 single family dwelling lots for The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 6 Subdivision Amore particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public .hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Dated this 21st day of December, 1995. WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CI CLERK C ~ r. ' ~ w ~~ • • fw""'~~'r_'*' r ~ ~ ~ . rr' ~' a r'~ la ~ • ~ _ ~ ~J ~. x - ~... M my •~«~, E :~~••~s 5 ~ ~_ 1 ~~ " ..• =, i ~T ~ _ 'rte - '.' ~ r~. _ ~ ~ ~ • ~ w ~ ~+`rY.~~~•~ylr•rrrr~ ~ + r r. .~ ~~ •~ , ~ : Q p , ~ rte, ~ !r' ~ ~ _ o f ,..~ ~ O ~~ ~ wr ~ s , - ~. ~ t • ~` I ~ ~ • L:, ' -~ ~ ~ ~ I / ~ 1 1 _~. .~ ~ o • - 1 ~~~~ u _ _ - .._ ~ `~---- - ~- .,..1~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ - ~. 1 i ~ tfrn ?I ~8 Nb~l i • ^ a ~ ^ ^ s ~ ~ ~ • ^ ./ ...a ~ 1 ~ s r' t , ~` ~ ~M . ~.~ 1 ~ Y ~ .~ ~ • ~ ~ s • ~; ~ J r. n ~, h ~ ^ \ , ~ ~ • !i µN~ ~ ,y~ ~~ q ` •l •~ ~ i . ~ « ~ W ~" ^ ~ 1~~ 1 ~ ~ ^ w .;ti: s ~, =~ , ~r ~ ~ , Senior Adult Living Planned Unit Development Property zoned: R-15 - R-4 Preliminary plat application: 52 single family unit detached under Conditional Use Permit Planned unit development Parcel size: 9.97 acres Units per acre: 5.22 Street width: 40 ft. private road right of way Lot sizes: from 4640 s. f. to 8000 s. f. Size of homes: 1301 s. f. minimum Garages: 2 car Set back: See attached Stories: All single story units Roofing: To be one solid color architecture 80 shingle Painting: Four different color combinations Landscaping: All front yards will be landscaped Parking: Each unit has two car garage and space for two on driveway plus off-street parking if needed STEINER DEVELOPMENT, INC. • LAND DEVELOPMENT :• 1 9 E. FAIRVIEW MERIDIAN, ID 83642 •:~ 208.884.2076 • ~ • ";~; ~s' ,:<x~,~~ AMENITIES 1. Private clubhouse Z. Pool 3. Recreation center with kitchen facilities 4. Gated security entrance 5. 6 ft. privacy wall surrounding project 6. Future bus stop 7. Golf cart pathway to golf course 8. 20 foot landscape buffer along Ten Mile Road 9. Donated City Fire Station 10. Landscaped median throughout project 11. 1/2 mile from proposed new Albertson store STEINER DEVELOPMENT, INC. • LAND DEVELOPMENT • 1 9 E. FAIRVIEW MERIDIAN. ID 83642 :• 208.884.2076 !: SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET ~~~iJi V ~~ O C T 2 8 1°~'& Proposed Development Name THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO 6 City MERIDIAN ~~ ~~~~ Date Reviewed 10/24/96 Preliminary Stage XX)UUC Final Engineer/DeveloperJ'acific Land S~rvevors / Steiner Dev ~~pment The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Boise City Street Name Ordinance. T_he f411ovvina existing street names s all appear on the plat as °N T N MILE ROAD" "N TANG ENT AVE ' i Y l "N PHO NIX AVE The f ollowing proposed strr~Qt n~mac are applov e~ and mall ap pear on the plat a~ "N ALTO AVE I<I iZKAM "W MONESS N STREET° "W MONTROSE DRIV The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by ~e representative or his designee In order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE EN RE ENTATIVES OR DESIGNEES Ada County Engineer John Priester ~ Date G~~ Ada Planning Assoc. Terri Rayno~~ Date ~ ©- Z~ ~~ fo City of Meridian Representative Date 10 - ate- fd Fire District Representative Date O ,oZ7'' ~c NOTE: A oopy of the evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plaY', otherwise the plat will not be signed 1111 Sub Index Street Index 3 1 E 3 Section NUMBERING OF LOTS AND TR~3UBSISM_CITY.FRM S~IVISION EVALUATION~EET RE~EIVED OC~ - 81996 c~rv bF -~~nun- Proposed Development Name THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO 5 City MERIDIAN Date Reviewed 9/5/96 Preliminary Stage Final XX)UUC Engineer/Developer PBCIfIC Land $UryeyorS / Stelfler Development The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Meridian City Street Name Ordinance. The following existing street names shall appear on the plat as' "N TEN MILE ROAD" "W TETER STREET" The following g_rogosed ctrapt name are apDfoved and shall aRDear on the Dlat as' j ~4n.1 G1-~ ~ T "N VENUE" ' "N PHOENIX AVENUE" N ROBIE AVENUE" "W KIRKAM STREET" "W MOON LAKE STREET" "W. ROCKIE STREET" is similarto ROCKY and therefore cannot be used Please choos ar~~ name. The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representativesoftha ADA COUNTY S~'REET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ~-, ADA COUNTY STREET NAME Ada County Engineer Ada Planning Assoc. City of Meridian Meridian Fire Dept. John Priester Terri Raynor, Representative Representative ~~~ `9' ~ NOTE: A copy of this evaluationsheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat" otherwise the plat will not be signed 1111 Sub Index Street Index 3N 1W 03 Section S 'ATIVES OR DESIGNEE Date ~y r 4 Date I ~ Date ~' S G NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS SU~IVISION EVALUATION ~ET ~~0~~~~~ S ~ P 1 6 1Q~6 Proposed Development Name THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. 5 City _MERI~IY OF 1KERID~AA1 Date Reviewed 9/5/96 Preliminary Stage Final X)CXXX EngineeNDeveloper .Pacific Land Surveyors / Steiner DeveloRment The Street name comments listed below are made bfhe members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direc6io of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in acxordance with the Meridian City Street Name Ordinance. The followin eq xisting street names shall aRpear on the plat as: "N. TEN MILE ROAD" "W. USTICK ROAD" "W. TETER STREET" N.~r~oozs ~>~ SfhFt-L ~3c N _ ~aNU~T ~~~>vt~t- "N. PHOENIX AVENUE' N. ROBIE AVENUE' "W. KIRKAM STREET" "W. MOON LAKE STREET' 'W. ROCKIE STREET" shall be used on the street between "N. PHOENIX AVENUE' and "N. SCOTTSDALE AVENUE". The above street name comments have been read andtpproved by the following agency'epresentatives of the. ADA COUNTY STREE NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the reprea6ative or his designee in order for the street names to be officialry approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE NCY R R E ATIVES OR DESIGNEES Ada County Engineer John Priester Date ~ S ~f Ada Planning Assoc. Terri Raynor ~ G~ - - _ Date ~- r ~ - City of Meridian Representative Date ~'- ~" S ~ Meridian Fire Dept. Representative 4w~-`z~ Date " ~ (D NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheetnust be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the'Yinal p1aY', otherwise the plat will not be signed 1111 Sub Index Street Index 3N 1W 03 Sectiop~ NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS 1 WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, Clty Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public WorlcsBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 ROBERT D. CORRIE Mayor September 11, 1996 Ms. Dale Conrad Washington Mutual 8620 Emerald Suite 190 Boise, ID 83704 373-3000 fax 373-3030 Re: The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 5 Subdivision Dear Ms. Conrad GOUNGIL MEMBERS WALT W. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M. ROUNTREE GLENN R. BENTLEY P & Z COMMISSION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman TIM HEPPER JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND MALCOLM MACCOY As of this date, The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 5 Subdivision preliminary plat has been approved by the City Council on July 10, 1996. A copy of those minutes are enclosed for your use. The development plans are in our possession and have been reviewed. If you have any questions, please calf me. Sincerely _~ William (;. Berg, Jr. City Clerk cc: file • Meridian City Council July 10, 1996 Page 3 - we authorize the City Attorney to conduct the negotiations for the late comers agreement pending the successful negotiations that we authorize the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest the late comers agreement for Gemtone Business Center No. 2. Rountree: Second Corrie: Okay, you have heard the motion by Mr. Morrow to have the attorney if it is approved by him to have the Mayor sign and the City Clerk to attest and it was seconded by Mr. Rountree, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea McHutchinson: Our next step is to probably get back to you regarding your comments. Crookston: That would be fine. ITEM #3: TABLED JUNE 18, 1996: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. 5 BY THE STEINER DEVELOPMENT: Corrie: Is there a representative from Steiner, Steve? Bradbury: Thank you Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, my name is Steve Bradbury, as you know I represent Steiner Development. You have before you I think the preliminary plat for The Lake at Cherry Lane Subdivision I think we are calling it number 6 now which is consistent with I think the Conditional Use Permit. I think we have agreed that we are calling this one six. It has been tough, I have been guessing half of the time myself. I believe it is consistent with the conditional use permit with the planned unit development which you approved last, 1 guess we were in March or April, the first part of April. We believe that it :responds to all of the concerns that had been expressed by the City Engineer, the City zoning staff. I Fod spoken with both Gary and Shari and over the cour~:a of the last couple of weeks to try to determine if there are any other issues that they were concerned with and they both responded in the negative that is it appears to be acceptable - to them. Since you have seen this darn thing so many times I am not sure that 1 want to take up your time explaining it any more. I would simply respond to any questions that you have. Corrie: Questions from Council? Rountree: Are we sure now vwe have all of the setbacks, comers and sides and everything? Bradbury: I believe that we do, I think so. I think we even got the right boundaries too. • Meridian City Council July 10, 1996 Page 4 - Now don't be giving me the fish eye I am not an engineer. Corrie: Any further questions from the Council? Rountree: Just a question for staff? Gary or Shari have all of your issues been addressed? Smith: Mr. Rountree, from my standpoint yes. Stiles: Yes they have. Corrie: Any further questions from Council? I will entertain a motion on the preliminary plat. Morrow. Mr. Mayor, I would move that we approve the preliminary plat for the Lake at Cherry Lane No. 6 by Steiner Development. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree that the preliminary plat for the Lake at Cherry Lane No. 6 by Steiner Development be approved, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #4: TABLED JUNE 18, 1996: FINAL PLAT FOR PACKARD SUBDIVISION NO. 1 BY PNE/EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION: Corrie: Is there a representative from Packard Subdivision? Tealy: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, my name is Pat Tealy I am represe; Ming the applicant for Packard Subdivision No. 1. Hopefully after all of these delays we have gotten the conditions met for the final plat approval. We submitted everything that was asked for I believe. There are two items in question that I got feed back on. Number one is the development agreement, we submitted the development agreement that evidently it has not, there are questions that the staff has about the development agreement we don't know the specifics of what they are but we are willing to address that and make that a condition of the final approval. What we did is take the development agreement as provided to us by the City of Meridian and filled in the blanks and submitted it back to the City. It was reviewed by the applicant's attorney and submitted back to the City. I believe the staff may have concerns with the development agreement, is that correct Shari or questions about portions of it? ~ ~ MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Auaust 20.1996 APPLICANT: STEINER DEVELOPMENT ITEM NUMBER; 12 REQUEST: REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION AND INFORMATION CENTER FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. S AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS r~J~ a~P ~~N ~~ All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ~~ a ~.f. 16 August 1996 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 Attn: Honorable. MayorRobert Con'ie and City Councilmen RE: Request for Temporary Construction and Infprmation Center Dear Mayor Corrie and Councilmen: Steiner Development; L.L.C.. is requesting permission to operate a construction and information center to be located on the 40 acre Teter parcel also known as The takes at Cherry Lane # 5 and # 6. The attached exhibit shows a picture of the proposed unit and .where the office would be located on the parcel We would like eons-year occupancy permit and will meet all City Code requirements. We feel that with our financial commitments to the area and the size of our project, as .well as the uniqueness of the golf course and our senior communities center we are offering., that the best way to approach our marketing efforts would be through this information. center. Below lists the office information: Office size - 12 x 56 Sewer - Will be provided by a holding tank that will be serviced weekly by The A Company.. Water -Will be supplied by a welt which is currently on site. Parking. Area - 3/4" gravel, 8° thick and compacted parking for 8 to 10 vehicles. Power -Run-overhead to a temporary power pole. Temporary power permit has been issued by the City of Meridianper Gary Smi#h with the understanding that obtaining a permanent permit will be based on future Council action. Thank you for your time and we look forward to a positive outcome. Si rel , Doug Cam II STEINER DEVELOPMENT, INC. •: LAND DEVELOPMENT 19 E. FAIRVIEW MERIDIAN, ID 83642 208.8842076 • • _~. _ _'.,•Y ; '"a ~~ ~, k•:~ -.~ b;~.~' y .. •T'' ..• S ] '-~1 . _.. ~~`~~, 1 .='.. i ~' {~ _... Terms /y! ~G ,: ~;.- tt~ w z ~~ ~ ~ U ~" ~"' ~ ~~ d ~x~d H ~ ~ 7 ° w w a ' ~ a ~Q ~ Q; }~ " ~ -.~ ~U~HUW fs W ~` g ~ ~ ~wrnaA zz tu ~w~ ~z~~H z ~ v~ ~~~~rn ~~ o ~ w I , a c ~ c~°'.~ooawo~ tt~ ~ Z C~~rn~d+~~AA--~ !-, I R -- -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - --7 A > ~ ~3 ~ ~ ~, ~ - - - - x $~ a ao°~ i z w O a D ~ ~ o u O O O I ~ I ~~~ ~, D .iVAI ~I3I~02I 'N a -I WI I I l I -! ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~~ j ~ \ ~ __ ~ ~ ~ ~. R JCVY 3Ifi02I 'H O O ~nrt~nv ,ru~~HV,c •x I~, r ~ ~I 1 I 1CVY ~SO~I 'H /\ AWiI~ia~ns Scotsman Sales Office. Where you make a sale is just as important as how you inalce a sale. An upscale sales center from Williams Scotsman can help put your prospects at ease. Our easily configured mobile space comes in a variety of sizes. Flexible interiors allow for quick, inexpensive modification of floor plans, and we can even custom design your space to meet specific needs, budgets and codes. Steps, security systems and furniture leasing are available from Williams Scotsman to finish off your space. And you have a variety of lease, purchase or lease-to-purchase plans to choose from. Malce your point of sale as comfortable and attractive as possible. Contact SCOTSMAN Sales Offices And More. k a Williams Scotsman Sales Representative today. r~ ~c~n~ SHERRY R. HUBER, President SUSAN S. EASTLAKE, Vice President JAMES E. BRUCE, Secretary TO: Steiner Development, L.L.C. P.O. Box 190472 Boise, ID 83719 FROM: Karen Gallagher, Coordinator Development Services Division SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat-The Lake At Cherry Lane #6 Ten Mile Rd r ,~.:~ t~~'. August 26, 1996 On August 21, 1996, the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District (hereafter called "District") took action on the Preliminary Plat as stated on the attached staff report. In order that the Final Plat may be considered by the District for acceptance, the Developer shall cause the following applicable standard conditions to be satisfied prior to District certification and endorsement: Drainage plans shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. 2. If public street improvements are required: Prior to any construction within the existing or proposed public right-of--way, the following shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District: a. Three complete sets of detailed street construction drawings prepared by an Idaho Registered Professional Engineer, together with payment of plan review fee. b. Execute and Inspection Agreement between the Developer and the District together with initial payment deposit for inspection and/or testing services. Complete all street improvements to the satisfaction of the District, or execute Surety Agreement between the Developer and the District to guarantee the completion of construction of all street improvements. ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714-6499 • Phone (208) 345-7680 August 26, 1996 Page 2 • 3. Furnish copy of Final Plat showing street names as approved by the Local Government Agency having such authority #~ eg they with payment of fee charged for the manufacturing and installation of all street signs, as required. 4. If Public Rights-of--Way Trust Find deposit is required, make deposit to the District in the form of cash or cashier's check for the amount specified by the District. 5. Furnish easements, agreements, and all other datum or documents as required by the District. 6. Furnish Final Plat drawings for District acceptance, certifications, and endorsement. The final plat must contain the signed endorsement. The final plat must contain the signed endorsement of the Owner's and Land Surveyor's certification. 7. Approval of the plat is valid for one year. An extension of one year will be considered by the Commission if requested within 15-days prior to the expiration date. Please contact me at 345-7680, should you have any questions. KG cc: Development Services Chron John Edney Chuck Rinaldi City of Meridian ADA~OUNTY HIGHWAY DI~RICT Development Services Division Development Application Report Preliminary Plat -The Lake at Cherry Lane #6 Ten Mile Road s/o Ustick Road City of Meridian The Lake at Cherry Lane #6 is a re-subdivision of Lot 7, Block 9, The Lake at Cherry Lane #5 for 52-lot residential subdivision on 9.97-acres. The site is located on Ten Mile Road approximately 1/3 mile south of Ustick. This development is estimated to generate 520 additional vehicle trips per day based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation manual. Roads impacted by development: Ten Mile Road ACHD Commission Date -August 21, 1996 - 12:00 p.m. 'k SIT tr tte c~ ~ ~i c m r E s / ~ i~:' ! • ` ~ ;.I/1V-1t N ink ?....; g ' .~Id'~~r• ': ~.~ ((// ..'~ •-- ' ' - ', r~' S ~ Q ~~~ ~7~ 1~i~• ~J Gool~in ~.. ~.~ ~ti ~ . ~~ N ~ r ' =~. ':_ ^ :~ ~' yj .^ o ~l_ - ; r w O w r• •- N3~ c :,, ,, .` W c L/ ~ .~r~~s~w~~~~. ~ , ~~ 1 ~ t °~' - -~ ° i _-___ o ~-- a - ~ ~, 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ W , © ' ~ - V ~ ~---~. Q D 3. . ;' ~ I . - ~. ~ ~... • ~: ~s - ' , • f _ _ _ r- -~.~- _ ~ . • . . ~ 1~ -(_ ~ i p 1 ~ • ~ i ~~~~ •~ •} ~~----- • ~, ~ v ~~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~. • t/m 21 s'78 n?l nl a • ~ • • • • ~ • • ~ • • •.. • ~ , s v_ ~ • ~ w. ,. r • V • .' • • ~ ~ ~ A "~ y w ~ ~' • • ~ /~ Z t` ~ w .( `]( . ~ ~ , Y • •• G • . ~' 2 • ••• 0 • • ~_ ~ L ~ • , w = • • ~ • ( ` LJ Facts and Findings: A. General Information R-8 -Zoning 52 -Lots 9.97 -Acres 0 -Total lineal feet of proposed public streets 260 -Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) West Ada- Impact Fee Benefit Zone Western Cities- Impact Fee Assessment District Ten Mile Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 1,632 on 4/15/94 440-feet of frontage 70-feet existing right-of--way (25-feet w/o section line) 90-feet required right-of--way (45-feet w/o section line) U Ten Mile Road is improved with 24-feet of pavement with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. This section is scheduled for design for reconstruction in the ACHD Five Year Work Plan for FY 2000. In accordance with District policy, staff recommends that the applicant construct a 5- foot wide concrete sidewalk on Ten Mile Road abutting the parcel (approximately 440-feet) B. This subdivision is a part of the previously approved Lake at Cherry Lane #5. The applicant is required to comply with the requirements of that review as well as any additional requirements outlined in this report. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to construct the east-west residential collector street (Teter Boulevard) abutting the entire north boundary of the site as required in the District's approval of The Lake at Cherry Lane #5, and a temporary turnaround if necessary. C. No access is proposed to Ten Mile Road except for the fire station on the out parcel. Staff recommends that direct lot or parcel access to Ten Mile Road be prohibited except for the fire station. D. The interior roads are proposed to be private roads. Staff recommends that the applicant install street name and stop signs for the private roads. E. ACHD does not make any assurances that the private roads which are a part of this application will be accepted as public roads if such a request is made in the future. CHERRYL6. WPD Page 2 • • Substantial redesign and reconstruction costs will be necessary in order to qualify this road for public ownership and maintenance. F. The submitted plat shows a security gate to be constructed at the project entry street. Staff recommends that the applicant install the gate a minimum of 50-feet from the east/west public road right-of--way (Teter Boulevard) and provide an area for vehicles to turn around without backing into the public street. G. The transportation system will be adequate to accommodate the additional traffic generated by this proposed development. H. The first preliminary plat for The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 6 was submitted in December of 1995. The District did not proceed with the preliminary plat because a digital disk of the subdivision was not submitted. A revised preliminary plat for The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 6 was received by the District on June 28, 1996. A digital disk of the subdivision has been received and the preliminary plat can be processed. This application was scheduled for a public hearing by the City of Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission on July 2, 1996. The following requirements are provided to the City of Meridian as conditions for approval: Site Specific Requirements: If the final plat for The Lake at Cherry Lane #5 has not be approved by the District prior to the District's approval of this final plat, the following conditions shall be required: Dedicate 45-feet of right-of--way from the ultimate street centerline of Ten Mile Road abutting the parcel (20 additional feet) prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits). The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of--way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone. If the owner wishes to be paid for the additional right-of--way, the owner must submit a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance, with Section 15 of ACRD Ordinance #188. Construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Ten Mile Road abutting the parcel (approximately 440-feet). Dedicate and construct the east-west residential collector street (Teter Boulevard) abutting the entire north boundary of the site as required in the District's approval of The Lake at Cherry Lane #5. Construct a temporary turnaround at the east end of the site/road if a turnaround or loop roadway has not been constructed by The Lake at Cherry Lane #5. CHERRYL6.WPD Page 3 • Direct lot or parcel access to Ten Mile Road is prohibited, in compliance with District policy. Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. 2. Install street name and stop signs for the private roads at intersections with public roads. 3. If a security gate is installed, the gate shall be a minimum of 50-feet from the east/west public road right-of--way (Teter Boulevard) and shall provide an area for vehicles to turn around without backing into the public street. 4. The interior roads are private roads. The applicant shall provide a plan showing how the private road grade meets the public road. District Policy requires a design approach speed of 20 MPH and a maximum intersection approach grade of 2 % for at least 40-feet. Street name and stop signs are required for the private road. The signs may be ordered through the District at the cost of $115. Verification of the correct. annroved name of the road is required. 5. ACHD does not make any assurances that the private roads which is a part of this application will be accepted as a public road if such a request is made in the future. Substantial redesign and reconstruction costs may be necessary in order to qualify this road for public ownership and maintenance. Standard Requirements: A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the Development Services Supervisor. The request shall ~necificall~identifv each requirement to be reconsidered and include a written explanation of why su,~ch a r~uirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequ~. The written request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9.00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested reconsideration. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. A request for an appeal of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Development Services Supervisor within 15 calendar days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The appeal will be scheduled to be heard by the Commission within 20 calendar days after receipt. The request for ~pneal~pecifically identify each CHERRYL6.WPD Page 4 • 3. Aright-of--way permit must be obtained from ACHD for any street or utility construction within the public right-of--way. Utility cuts should be combined where practical to limit pavement damage. i ltili , street cuts in roads paved within the last five years will not be allowed unless approved ~y the District Commission. Contact Construction Services at 345- 7667 (with file number) for details. 4. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and appropriate action by ACRD prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits). The proposed drainage system shall retain all storm water on-site (may be coordinated with The Lake at Cherry Lane #5) and shall conform to the requirements of the city or county having jurisdiction. Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the public right-of--way or in a common lot owned by a homeowners association set aside specifically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, or other valuable amenities placed in said easement. Drainage lots and their use restrictions shall be noted on the plat (when applicable). 5. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot property lines when driveways are not being shared with the adjacent property. 6. Construct pedestrian ramps on the corner of all street intersection in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 40-1335. 7. Dedicate a up to a 20-foot x 20-foot right-of--way triangle (or appropriate curve) to keep street improvements within the public right-of--way at all intersections abutting and/or within the development prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits). 8. Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across parcel. 9. Continue borrow ditch drainage abutting parcel (culvert may be required). 10. Provide written approval from the appropriate irrigation/drainage district authorizing storm runoff into their system. 11. If street improvements are required, locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drainage ditches and appurtenances, etc.) outside of .the public right-of--way. Authorization for relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. If determined by the District, existing irrigation facilities may remain in the right-of-way with District review and approval of easements recorded for future relocation at a later date. CHERRYL6.WPD Page 5 • 12. Locate proposed sign(s) out of the public right-of--way and out of the clear-vision sight- triangle of all street and driveway intersections. 13. Install a stop sign on every unsignalized approach of a project street to an intersection involving a collector or arterial as the cross-street. The stop sign shall be installed when the project street is first accessible to the motoring public. 14. The developer is required to install street name signs at the locations approved by the Ada County Highway District. Purchase street name signs, sign poles, and mounting hardware from ACHD's Traffic Operations Department or an approved outside supplier. The District will not manufacture street signs until a copy of the recorded plat showing the recording data has been provided to Development Services staff. 15. Provide a clear vision sight triangle at all driveway and street intersections. Within this triangle no obstruction higher than 36-inches above the top of pavement will be allowed, including but not limited to landscaping, berms, fences, walls or shrubs. The triangle shall be defined with the long leg measured 200-feet to 540-feet (depending on speed limit) along the centerline of any road; and the short leg measured from the curb line of the road 20-feet along the centerline of the intersecting driveway or street (see District policy Figure F7). Provide notes of these restrictions on the plat/site plan and street construction plans. 16. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District for review and appropriate action. 17. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for review and appropriate action by ACHD. 18. All public streets and drainage systems shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and policies. 19. Specifications, land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACHD shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54-1215. 20. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. CHERRYL6.WPD Page 6 21. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. CHERRYL6. WPD Page 7 • • "'~ Meridian City Council July 10, 1996 Page 3 we authorize the City Attorney to conduct the negotiations for the late comers agreement pending the successful negotiations that we authorize the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest the late comers agreement for Gemtone Business Center No. 2. Rountree: Second Corrie: Okay, you have heard the motion by Mr. Morrow to have the attorney if it is approved by him to have the Mayor sign and the City Clerk to attest and it was seconded by Mr. Rountree, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: Atl Yea McHutchinson: Our next step is to probably get back to you regarding your comments. Crookston: That would be fine. ITEM #3: TABLED JUNE 18, 1996: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. 5 BY THE STEINER DEVELOPMENT: Corrie: Is there a representative from Steiner, Steve? Bradbury: Thank you Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, my name is Steve Bradbury, as you know I represent Steiner Development. You have before you I think the preliminary plat for The Lake at Cherry Lane Subdivision I think we are calling it number 6 now which is consistent with I think the Conditional Use Permit. I think we have agreed that we are calling this one six. It has been tough, I have been guessing half of the time myself. I believe it is consistent with the conditional use permit with the planned unit development which you approved last, I guess we were in March or April, the first part of April. We believe that it responds to all of the concerns that had been expressed by the City Engineer, the City zoning staff. 1 hid spoken with both Gary and Shari and over the cour°:e of the last couple of weeks to try to determine if there are any other issues that they were concerned with and they both responded in the negative that is it appears to be acceptable to them. Since you have seen this darn thing so many times I am not sure that I want to take up your time explaining it any more. I would simply respond to any questions that you have. Corrie: Questions from Council? Rountree: Are we sure now we have all of the setbacks, comers and sides and everything? Bradbury: I believe that we do, I think so. I think we even got the right boundaries too. * ,, • Meridian City Council July 10, 1996 Page 4 - Now don't be giving me the fish eye I am not an engineer. Corrie: Any further questions from the Council? a Rountree: Just a question for staff? Gary or Shari have all of your issues been addressed? Smith: Mr. Rountree, from my standpoint yes. Stiles: Yes they have. Corrie: Any further questions from Council? I will entertain a motion on the preliminary plat. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we approve the preliminary plat for the Lake at Cherry Lane No. 6 by Steiner Development. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree that the preliminary plat for the Lake at Cherry Lane No. 6 by Steiner Development be approved, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #4: TABLED JUNE 18, 1996: FINAL PLAT FOR PACKARD SUBDIVISION NO. 1 BY PNE/EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION: Corrie: Is there a representative from Packard Subdivision? Tealy: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, my name is Pat Tealy I am represP-Ming the applicant for Packard Subdivision No. 1. Hopefully after all of these delays we have gotten the conditions met for the final plat approval. We submitted everything that was asked for - I believe. There are two items in question that I got feed back on. Number one is the development agreement, we submitted the development agreement that evidently it has not, there are questions that the staff has about the development agreement we don't know the specifics of what they are but we are willing to address that and make that a condition of the final approval. What we did is take the development agreement as provided to us by the City of Meridian and filled in the blanks and submitted it back to the City. It was reviewed by the applicant's attorney and submitted back to the City. I believe the staff may have concerns with the development agreement, is that correct Shari or questions about portions of it? MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: July 2.1996 APPLICANT: ITEM NUMBER; 3 REQUEST:TABLED JUNE 18. 1996: PRELIMIINARY PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: A / CITY BUILDING DEPT: Q J MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: r ~' MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shal l become property of the City of Meridian. WILLIIeM G. BERG, JR., Ctty Clerk JA":!Cic L GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROfT Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Flre Chief W.L. "BILL' GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney • t ~ H UB OF TREASURE YAILEy COLtNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live WALT W. MORROW, President CITY OF MERIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA E C GLENN R. BENTLEY 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO $3642 P & Z COMMISSION Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Public Worlcs/Building IkpaRrneat (208) 887-2211 TIM HEPPER MOWr Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND " ROBERT D. CORRIE MALCOLM MACCOY Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WTI'H THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: June 28~ 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 6!24/96 HEARING DATE: 7/2 /96 REQUEST: Revised Preliminary Plat for The Lake at Chemr Lane No 6 BY: Steiner Development LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: W. of Ten Mile Road and South of Ustick Road JIM JOHNSON, P2 MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MALCOLM MACCOY, P2 MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) JIM SHEARER, P2 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ,~ C ~~ ~ v ~.~ GREG OSLUND, P2 ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P2 CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH 4- `~ jg~~~': ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDWN IRRIGATION DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT ;I`~"V OF ~~lEP1[3i~i. CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) WALT MORROW, C/C U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) GLENN BENTLEY, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PREUM ~ FINAL PLAT) -WATER DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY FILES > /~ •~- OTHER: ~,FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY ~ S .-a o crrvG ~ .e a err! ; wrcr CITY ENGINEER T' CITY PLANNER Cl~u av 7'" Si ~ E S ,~r~~ .? ~? ~~ WIL! ~l4M G. BERG, JR., Clty Clerk JANICE L. GASS, Clty Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. 3HAWCROFT, Weste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parka Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P 8 Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Flre Chief W.L. "BILL' GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF 1V~RIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAR (208) 887-4813 Public Works/Building Depa~ent (208) 887-2211 Motor Vehicle/Drivers Liaea:e (208) 888-4443 ROBERT D. CORRIE Maya GO~JNGIL MEMBERS WALT W. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M. ROUNTREE GLENN R. BENTLEY P & Z COMMISSION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman TIM HEPPER JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND " MALCOLM MACCOY TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: June 28, 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 6/24/96 ~ HEARING DATE: 712/96 REQUEST: Revised Preliminary Plat for The Lake at Chenv Lane No 6 BY: Steiner Develoa~ment LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: _ W. of Ten Mile Road and South o Ustick Road JIM JOHNSON, P2 MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MALCOLM MACCOY, P2 MERIDWV POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8r FINAL PLAT) JIM SHEARER, P2 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT GREG OSLUND, P2 _~4DA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P2 CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT} WALT MORROW, CIC U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) GLENN BENTLEY, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRE 8 FINAL PLAT) WATER DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF RECLAMA RELI FINAL PLAT) SEWER DEPARTMENT CITY FILES / BUILDING DEPARTMENT / OTHER: `j IRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER JUN 2 $ 1996 {~'ty (~~' MERIDIAN t h • • SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET Proposed Development Name THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. 5 City MERIDIAN Date Reviewed 7/11/96 Preliminary Stage XXXXX Final EngineedDeveloper Pacific Land Surveyors / Steiner Develor,ment The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer] rr3garding this development in accordance with the Meridian City Street Name Ordinance. The following proposed street names may be reserved for use in this development "SCOTTSDALE" "PHOENIX" The above street name comments have been road and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL ofthe signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. n ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTE , AG C R RE NT TNES OR DESIGNEES Ada County Engineer John Priester ~ Date ~~ ~~ Ada Planning Assoc. Terri Rayn r 1 Date ~ City of Meridian Representative/ ate `~~"Z~ Meridian Fire Dept. Representative ~ ~-~'-~-- Date ~~~1 9 NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineerat the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed !I!! _ .__ Sub Index Street Index _3N 1W 03 Section _ _ NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS . • FAClMlL~ CQV~R SHEET DATE: TO: __Terri Ravner. Project Analvat -- AdA PLANNING ASSOc~roTrnN FAX Ar: I2081 345.5279 RE: street N m~ Request ~0• Proposed Development Name~~~ L0.~r ~~.w~r . ~ city .~~..~ Date Submitted ~/- Preliminary Stage Finai Engineer/Daveioper ! ~}! G LdY~~ 5.,r+~.~.~~.. c• Contact Person _L_._~dr (tS ~ ~~ V ~ ,_,_ Phane #~ ~ g~ ~ ~!~ Signature ~ l.~ 5~"/_~_ The Street names listed below are being requested for use within this development. EXlSi"ING S7RE~TS: PROPOSED STREET NAMES: C I~/ 3N iC" A copy cf the plat with readable street names should be included with this request far processing by the Street Name Committee. NUMBER OF PAGE=S TO FOLLOW: ~ RETURN FAX #: ~~ OO 2 ~ TAlSUBSVQTpEET.F/J( ,~~ - -~- SENT BY~ 4--16-96 :11~38AM ; • EBERLE, BERL I IW •, .. _ 208 887 4813:# 1/ 3 EBERL~ RLnv, KADnvG, TuRNBOw i & ie~LVEEN, CHARTERED 300 North Sixth Street Post Office Box 1368 Boise, Idaho 83701-1368 Tione No.: (208) 344-8535 Faesimile No.: (208) 344-8542 ~' COVER SHEET SATE: April 16, 1996 FAGES ~TCLUDING THIS SHEET: 3 TO: Mayor Corm snd Meridian City Council NUMHER: 887-4813 FROM: Stephen A. B~sdbury . MATTBR: Lako at Chem Jane Subdivision No. S MEMO: Please see attached. if transmission is aa~tproperly received, please call Jeri at (208) 344-8535. ****** 71M ~-~....4w ~ In AYr aw..~~d/w 4.rrwryire rrnflyel, c.ryUxalaf wt .lyk- A.r +~ .Jeer MiN/~N e..riry ~.1.6.`r. ~/Ar r+W-.f dW wota~e a nw elr 4rrnlul mioaw. )w eee brrrM +~ Or a~r~.r.due.., ~Irslbra. a nl7~f q~Orr aamroY~.ear b ~nkd7 ) 0'i~ Awe rashes/ dir .aan~rogo+ M fmb'. PMT ~ Vt Airrel.tdy 4y eslfra .de~.tar6aMR rAe. alpi.e nrrwR N rs M 11. fin. ali~si des !ldl. Ie.Y. IVs MY aAn6rwa y.r fir /wlbFl. 7ki` }rM. APR 16 '96 11 39 2083448542 PAGE.O? SE1VT BY ~ 4-16-96 : l I ~ 39A1N : FRFRI F, BI]tL 1 N~ 208 887 4813: # 21 3 • EBERLE, 13ERLlN, KAOING, TURNBOW & MCKLVEEN, CHARTERED ATTORNFT$ ANO COVNSE~OR6 AT I.Aw CAOITOI PARK P1.A2A 300 NORTH SIXI'N STREET • PDST OFFICE 9071 13lS9 $TGMiCN A. BRAG•URY BOISE. IDAHO 837OI April 16, 1996 TItANSMl1'TED VIA FACSIlyIILE Mayor Robert Corrie Meridian City Council 33 East Idaho Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 . 7>FL.6PFION C. FiICatMrlE ~M-AOA6 .>Mr+o 4 OEAIIN ~ COuN30. L ~LFitRI[ IrCiJ•IY7>) Re: Request for Reconsideration on Conditional Use Permit for The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 5 Request for Tabling of Preliminary Plat for The Lake at Cherry Lane Na S Dear Mayor Come and Members of the City Cowtcil: You will recall that on Apri12, 1996, you adopted Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Steiner Development's application for a conditional use pexmit for a planned utit development designated as The Lake at Cherry Lane Subdivision No. 5. You will also rot;all that in connection with that application, Steiner Development requested relief from certain of the standard setback requirements applicable to residential structures in an R-15 zone. In approving the conditional use permit, the City Council granted some of the requested setback relief (that is, reducing the front yard setbacks from 20 to 15 feet) but denied the request that street side yard setbacks be reduced from 20 to 15 feet. Steiger Development would like an opportunity to discuss the street side yard s~back with the City Council further and attempt to dentooatrate to the City Council that a reduction of thaz setback would be appropriate for this developrreot. Accordingly, please treat this letter as Steiner Development's request for reconsideration of the City Council's April 2, 1996, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Steiner Development's application for a conditional use permit for a planned unit development font The Lake at Cherry Lane No. S, insofar as those findings and conclusions denied Steiner Development's request for a reduction in the stnoet side yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet, I would appreciate it if youwould make the nea- arrangements to have this request placed on the agenda of the City Council's next regularly scheduled meeting which, I believe, is lay 7, 1996. At that time, we will be prepared to present information to the Council derrromtrating why the requested setback reduction should be allowed. APR 16 '96 11 40 2083448542 PAGE. 08 SENT BY~ 4-16-96 :11~40AM : Mayor Corrie and City Council April 16, 1996 Page 2 EBERLE,BERLIN~ • ....... .......,. i:::. ,_ 208 887 4813:# 3/ 3~. In addition, and in view of the above stated request for reconsideration, Steiner Development also asks that further consideration of the preliminary plat for The Take at Cherry. Lane No. 5 be continued until May 7, 1996, in order that the City Council will have an opportunity to address the setback issues. As you can no doubt appreciate, the layout of the plat is, at least in part, dependent upon the size of the setbacks applicable to the lots in that subdivision. it appears to us that further consideration of the preliminary plat may be inappropriate prior to final determination on the applicable setbacks. Your consideration of this n~uest will be much appreciated. very truly yours, to hen .Bradbury SAB: jlQ cc via fax; Shari Stiles Glary Smith Will Berg Wayne Crookston Doug Campbell cc via mail: Sandy Clay APR 16 '96 11 40 2083448542 PAGE.09 ~ ~ MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 18 1996 The regular meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order by Mayor Robert D. Corrie at 7:30 P. M.: MEMBERS PRESENT: Walt Morrow, Glenn Bentley, Charles Rountree, Ron Tolsma: OTHERS PRESENT: Will Berg, Wayne Crookston, Shari Stiles, Gary Smith, Mike Wardle, Roen Wilson, Wayne Forrey, Karen Forrey, Gordon Slyter, Van Elg, Chief Gordon, Larry Gray, John Stubblefield, Pat Dobie, David Turnbull, Mike Cavens, Brian Iverson, Becky Bowcutt, Dan Clark, Robert Phillips, Pat Tealey: MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD JUNE 4, 1996: Corrie: Any corrections to the minutes? Entertain a motion we accept the minutes as typed. Rountree: Mr. Mayor, I move that we accept the minutes as typed from our previous meeting. Bentley: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree, second by Mr. Bentley, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #1: TABLED JUNE 4, 1996: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. 5 BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT: Corrie: Council, you have a letter I think asking that be tabled one more time until the July 2nd meeting, you are all in receipt of that? Morrow: Mr. Mayor I wov:~i move that we table the preliminary plat for the Lake at Cherry _ Lane No. 5 until our meeting on July 2, 1996. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree that we table the preliminary plat for the Lake at Cherry Lane No. 5 by Steiner Development until our meeting on July 2, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #2: TABLED JUNE 4, 1996: FINAL PLAT: PACKARD SUBDIVISION NO. 1 BY MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: JUNE 18.1996 APPLICANT: ITEM NUMBER; 1 REQUEST: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. S BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: S CITY FIRE DEPT: ~ ,/~ 1 CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ~S MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. SENT BY~EBERLE BERLIN .....~ .. Eberle Berlin-- 206 667 4613 ~i1 2 ~~: Jse Permit for The Lake fat Cherry Labe J ~,' -~ 1 4 1"~~ QTY OF A+[E~IDIAN ~ No. S ~; Request for Tabling of Preliminary Plat fo The Lake at Ch Late No.~ S i ~Y I?eat ~ul~yor Currie and Members of the City Council: Please consider this letter,as our request for the C uncil to continue furthe~' consideration of thy' preliminary plat until the July2, 19%, meeting. ~ ~ - ;i Thank you for your continued courtesy and consideration. In the event'~you have atiy ~q~estioris, please feel free w give. me a call. , V trul Ur EBERI..E, $ERLIN, KADI(NC~, TURNBOW & MCKLVEE~T, CI~ARTERED ATroRrOnrs Arm CovNSBLORS AT LAw CAMCAL PARK PLATw 'rgygp~0~ 300 NORTH SDCtH 5TR88T 08~ 34~-855 P09T OPPICB BO?L 136 FMS Boiss,lDAHO 83701 8) 34~-85+{~ 3TBeHrat A. BRADB~tRY ] L. BBBI:W jOF COiA18ffi, ' T.H. B$~lLa (197?r1977? ]une 14, 1996 Re: Request for Reconsideration on Conditional Ma j-or Robert Currie Meri~isll City Council ' 3~3 sty Idaho Avenue ii[eiatl, ID 83642 SAB:J~T cc: Shari Stiles nary Smith :Doug Campbell Sandy Clay 6-14-96 ~ 3~26PM ~y y yo , 9, ' l~ ~~a ~~ Stephen A. Bradbury ' i j j JUN 14 ' 96 1S~ 30 2083448542 PAGE.02 ~-• T SENT BY~EBERLE BERLIN ; 6-14-96 ; 3~26PM ; Eber I e Ber I in-- 206 667 4613;~i 1 EBERLE, $E~tLnv, xADnvG, TURNBo & McK~LVEEN, CHARTERED 300 North Sixth Street Post Office Box 1368 Boise, Idaho 83701-1368 Telephong No.: (208) 344-8535 ,~ Facsimile No.: (208) 344-8542 FAx COVER SHEET DATE: June 14, 1996 PAGES' INCLUDING THIS SHEET: 2 TO: Mayor Come and Meridian Ciry Council NUMBER: .i 887-4813 PROM: Stephen A. &adbury A~dT`TER: ~, Lake at Cherry Lane Subdivision No. 5 MEMO:, Please see attached. If transmission ig not properly recxived, please call Jeri at (208) ~ WAmwk~ ~nr In Ma 4.aerA~w wn~.w4 .qr ~ ary A. or a y Ak e~rnl~,r e..wa ~sI a6rw. r uw ao ~4~~ r+•... N+-Ay ++Ma r. ay , any .. opyj 4/11Ys ea~ieron r,ninry ~.~. pyor As» ~ .Il.~ l~~ ~!Oh' at Mwe~.leb 6~ es1Ye'rMf~~Yas cwt n~ ds mlab~d warpN ro r ar eAe xEa. ~Ikar~ N. U.i. A/dA Wr rNl ~YO~Yrrr P~.M ' . JUN 14 '96 15 29 r S. .abr q/iMr mrorye rr. ~«.oro~„r,,, w ZAatyar. L; 2083448542 PAGE.01 Meridian City Council June 4, 1996 Page 21 ITEM #2: TABLED MAY 7, 1996: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. 5 BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT; DISCUSSION OF REQUIREMENTS IN FINDINGS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMlT: Corrie: Is there a representative from The Lake at Cherry Lane? Bradbury: Thank you Mr. Mayor, members of the Council my name is Steve Bradbury as you know I am an attorney representing Steiner Development, the applicant who is seeking approval for the Lake at Cherry Lane Subdivision. I guess there are actually two things that we are here to talk about and I would like to take the second one first because it probably fits better. Some time back in April I sent a letter to the Mayor and Council asking the Council to take a second look at the findings and conclusions that they adopted on the second of April with respect to that subdivision and you recall the one 1 am talking about is the proposed senior complex over there. What the developer had requested in connection with that project was that, it was a conditional use permit for a planned development for this subdivision. Part of that planned development request the developer was requesting release from certain of the setback requirements which are typically required in the applicable zone in that case it was an R-15. The Council granted a number of the developers requests in that respect but there was one that the Council did not and that had to do with the reduction of the street sideyard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet, the R-15 zone requires 20 feet setback between a structure and the street when it is a side street. Since that time Mr. Campbell and I have been scratching our heads and try to figure out how we might be able to suggest to you that perhaps you take another look at it and give you a couple of reasons why. We were trying to think of what the issues might be in your minds and I guess we have come up with a couple of the and there are probably others but we have at least two. Those would be, I have to expect that one of the things that you are worried about is safety for the driving public. As they motor around corners you want to be able to see around the corner. And that is why the State, the City and the highway district all have vision triangle requirements. That is one issue that we figure is probably of some concern. The second issue is the aesthetics, you don't want to have houses all jammed up against the streets. You want to have a little bit of space. So we understand both of those issues and we think that we can accomplish both of them even with a 15 foot setback. What I did is I sent a letter to you folks dated the 31st and I have a drawing that looks something like this, did you folks all get one of those? What we did is or Mr. Campbell asked his project engineer Keith Jacobs to do a layout and to show out the streets might be set up and what we have here is a layout of the subdivision showing the foot prints of the proposed structures on the lots as well as the patterns of the streets and the sidewalks which would be built. What we asked Mr. Jacobs to do is to show the vision triangles on each one of these corners that we are talking. It is these comers here, here and here and around here that we are asking for a reduction in the setback from 20 to 15 feet. What we asked Mr. Jacobs to do is to show the vision triangle and how it meets Meridian City Council June 4, 1996 Page 22 • the requirements not only of State code but the policies of the Highway District and in fact exceeds the requirements of the City's ordinance to meet those vision triangles even though we may only have a 15 foot setback. So that you are not mislead in any way there are a couple of proposed lots, structures here that actually encroach by a couple of as I understand it a couple two or three inches into that vision triangle and we fully acknowledge that we would have to deal with that if the Council was inclined to reconsider the setback requirement. For the most part the vision triangle is required by State law, it can be complied with even with a 15 foot setback. Now the other thing that we expect probably are thinking about is just the aesthetics and that is-are these houses going to be jammed up against the roads. You will recall that these are private streets, you approved them as private streets and they are proposed to have 42 feet total right of way width, but only 37 of those feet are actually going to be improved that is there is going to be 28 feet of asphalt, 2 feet of curb and gutter on either side and then there is going to be a 5 foot sidewalk on one side. So that gets us up to 37 feet, so five feet of unimproved road right of way. What we also asked Mr. Jacobs to do is to design, to depict on the drawing and show in the design how it is that if the improvements for the right of way were all put over within one foot of the sidewalk side of the streets we would end up with an additional four feet of unimproved area adjacent to each one of these corner lots that we were worried about that we are asking to have some relief from the setbacks. That is what Mr. Jacobs has done and our artistry, my artistry is not particularly good but the green is the area that we are showing on the map as being those additional four feet which would exist of unimproved area that when added to the 15 foot setback which is depicted on the drawing would then result in there being a total of 19 feet between any structure and any portion of the road right of way. So in essence what we are hoping the Council wit( recognize is even with a 15 foot sideyard setback we are going to have nearly the 20 feet of separation between homes and streets. We are hopeful that the Council will recognize given the fact that these are private streets, they don't attach, there are no through streets here, they service only this portion of the subdivision. We don't expect there will be a great deal of traffic in the subdivision. It is a senior citizens complex or proposed to be one. We are hopeful that it makes good sense in order to allow the project to proceed as it is presently designed to reconsider your previous determination not to allow fora 15 foot side yard setback and grant that relief at this point. With that I guess since you have so much more business yet to do tonight I will be pleased to answer any questions if you have them. Morrow: I have a question Mr. Bradbury, as t recall is this not a gated corrr~nunity? Bradbury: Yes, the proposal is to have a gate in there. I guess the other thing that is on your agenda tonight is the preliminary plat and of course we are holding onto the plat until we know what you folks have in mind for the setbacks. Our expectation would be depending on the outcome of this request then we would be able to present that preliminary plat to you at a future date. • Meridian City Council June 4, 1996 Page 23 Morrow: Mr. Mayor I would ask for comments from staff either Shari or Gary. Smith: Mr. Mayor and Council members, I spoke with the developer and Mr. Bradbury a week or more ago concerning these corner lots. The one thing that I asked them to consider is the situation we find ourselves in quite often with people wanting to build fences in the setback area on corner lots. Typically the corner lots are the same size as the interior lots and the property owners which to have a back yard because they are forced or faced with a side yard and front yard setback. So they come to the fence variance committee that the City Council has formed requesting some relief from that side yard setback fora 6 foot privacy fence. When we move five feet closer to the road, closer to the street this becomes another issue or maybe a bigger issue because the fence committee has been pretty much steadfastly holding to ten feet minimum from property line. Those property lines in a standard subdivision are 2 feet behind the sidewalk. So that from the sidewalk, the back of sidewalk to the building is 22 feet typically. We are counting 10 feet off the back of .sidewalk. So I don't know how this is going to be met with the people building on the lots and the desires of having a sideyard fence closer than the setback distance which in this case has been reduced to 15 feet or could be reduced to 15 feet with your action. In other words, there is not going to be much gain on a fence as far as the fence variance committee and I am speaking myself but from the fence committee's past performance in hearing and acting upon requests for variances. I think they are going to hold to the ten feet in other words. So I don't want the impression that there is going to be more room in these back yards because of this closer setback because I personally don't feel that there will be. Thank you. Corrie: Shari, any comments? Do you understand what he has said here? Bradbury: I do Mr. Mayor and I apologize, I remember that we had this discussion a week ago and I should have phrased it because at the time Mr. Campbell and I put our heads together and said we understand what the City Engineer's concern is and it is a legitimate issue and we kind of in our short hand talked back and forth and said we could probably handle that in the restrictive covenants. Understanding that in addition to the City's requirements we can adopt restrictivve covenants which can regulate the location of fences. Which Mr. Campbell is more than willing to do and we would of course accept any kind of condition along those lines that you folks though was appropriate. Let me add one more thing that we tend to forget as we go through these as months go by and we talk about these projects in little bits and pieces. One of the primary features of this project is the developer is going to build it out not only the subdivision improvements but also the homes within the subdivision and also the landscaping on each of the lots including the fencing. And so it is a total build out so the developer is going to have in essence at least initial construction complete control on where everything is put and how it is built and the way it appears. So to that extent I think by imposing an appropriate condition on location of • Meridian City Council June 4, 1996 Page 24 fences and so that you folks all feel comfortable with it I think we can at least establish the , line in the sand if you will from the beginning. I will expect that the residents then would probably have a tendency to accept what it is they buy when they buy it. And of course the (inaudible) pleased to live with the reasonable condition with respect to fencing if that is (inaudible). Morrow: I have a question, with respect to the fences Steve, this is a PUD, planned unit development basically, and it is an issue here where you are doing the build out. (Inaudible) you don't see the typical 6 foot cedar fencing you see something more along the lines of 3 foot rod iron fences and so on my question would be what is your plan for fencing, you commitment to the fencing issue? Bradbury: I am going to have to look over at Mr. Campbell because I have to tell you I don't know the answer to the question. My reaction is like yours I would be surprised to see 6 foot cedar fencing around these lots. I would be very surprised to see 6 foot cedar fences along any of these side yards. Campbell: We will probably handle it with a 6 foot rod iron, probably 4 inches on center, more of an open look. Corrie: Thank you, any further comments from Council? Morrow: I guess a follow up question Mr. Mayor to Gary Smith, the issues of is there a difference in terms of rod iron and open fences as opposed to close fences with respect to your committee? Smith: Yes sir, by ordinance the fence can be in the setback area and be classified as open up to 4 foot in height, up to 3 foot in height as a closed fence. An open fence is if my memory serves me correct 20% of the space can be occupied by solid material. Morrow: Thank you Smith: So in one foot of length in fence 12 inches, 20% of that would be 2.4 inches of solid material in one foot. Corrie: Any other comments? Rountree: I have another question for Gary, with the kind of proposal that has been indicated here would that take care of your concern? Smith: I don't know if I have an answer to that Councilman Rountree, if it taller than 4 foot • Meridian City Council June 4, 1996 Page 25 even if it is open, I don't think the ordinance addresses anything that is taller than 4 feet- if it is open. I know there are some 6 foot chain link fences that exist, I am not sure they were permitted into existence but they are there. Bradbury: If it is will help I just asked Mr. Campbell if 4 feet was satisfactory to him and he indicated to me that was just fine. I hope the Council does get hung on the six foot fence because that is what Mr. Campbellinee f eel better abso utelyWith. If the four foot makes you feel better and makes the eng Cowie: I guess Council we don't have a procedure for reconsideration, however I guess if there are no changes in the plat is that correct Shari does this change anything as far as the plat is concerned? This specific change can be made in your conditional use permit. Counselor we discussed this this afternoon, do you want to further with that. Crookston: (Inaudible) that the City Council has the authority even though we do not have a reconsideration procedure that the Council can just of its own motion address a reconsideration request. As I have previously stated though we do need a get a procedure for it but that does not mean the Council does not have the authority to do it. Rountree: I guess my question would be that it would follow the parliamentary process, Roberts Rules process of a motion made by council person previously casting an affirmative. If you voted for it last time you can make a motion if you didn't vote for it last time you are out of line. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we approve the 15 yard set back for Cherry Lane at the Lake No. 5 subject to any and all fencing meeting current City ordinances and set back regulations. Crookston: I think that it would be appropriate to state which lots that pertains to because if you leave. it as is then that would apply to all lots. Bentley: Mr. Mayor, Walt can you restate that motion because if I heard you correctly you stated the motion was approve the 15 foot setback in accordance with the existing ordinances for setbacks. Morrow: No, that is not what I said, my motion was I believe to approve the 15 foot side yard setback and that the existing ordinances with respect to fences be adhered to. In answer to Mr. Crookstons point, in a PUD, we are addressing, the discussion here is we are addressing the issue of these specific lots that are corner lots. But in the interior lots we don't have a side yard setback problem. At this point in terms of the motion if we are going to include the description of each of the lots that it applies then we need a menu of Meridian City Council June 4, 1996 Page 26 those lots. Crookston: That is correct, possibly the easiest way to handle it is to just as Mr. Bradbury indicated they could meet the vision triangle within a foot as I understood it is that not correct Mr. Bradbury? That you could meet the vision triangle (End of Tape) Bradbury: If I am understanding the question our engineer in calculating the vision triangles has concluded that all of the lots would meet except there are a couple that had a few inches that we would have to deal with through a redesign or somehow accomplish which we would of course do. I think I can, if you feel it is important I can give you the menu that you are asking for on the lots. But I might suggest that you simply talk in terms of the 15 foot street side yard setback on corner lots. Now, I hate to make it more complicated than it already is but there were these two lots up here at the entrance that were allowed a 10 foot side yard setback so they would need to be excluded from consideration. They already have the 10, like I say I hate to make it already complicated than it is but we we are really talking about is the corner lots that would otherwise require 20 foot side yard setback simply requesting it be reduced to 15 and the motion could be phrased in that form. If you would like a menu I could try and give that to you. Morrow: Well at this point I want to withdraw the motion. I think given the discussion that just took place and the other entry lots my preference now would be to have a menu of the lots that we are talking about per the counselor's suggestion for sake of (inaudible). Maybe I might suggest while they are putting that menu together that we continue this and press on with items 3 and 4 and then come back to this Mr. Mayor rather than wait or take a recess while they put that together. Are you ready for that now? Bradbury: I can read it to you, it is going to be Lots 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 47, 51, 56, all in Block 11. Morrow: That is all of them then, those are the ones that show on our map here. Bradbury: That is correct, wait I missed one, I am sorry, and 23, same block. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would that we grant to the Lake at Cherry Lane No. 5 the 15 foot side yard. setback on Lots 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 47, 51, 56, 23 of Block 11 and that each of those lots meet the existing Meridian City fencing ordinance and specifications. Rountree: I will second with a clarification. Corrie: Discussion Meridian City Council June 4, 1996 Page 27 Rountree: 15 foot side yard variance, not 15 yard. Morrow: Yes, 15 feet Mr. Rountree, that is my intention. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree. fora 15 foot side yard setback meeting the existing ordinances for fences on Lots 23, 38, 38, 40, 41, 42, 46, 47, 51, 56 all of Block 11, and adhere to the existing ordinance (inaudible) any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Corrie: I guess we need to go to the preliminary plat. Bradbury: We just simply ask that you defer the preliminary plat until the next meeting to give us an opportunity to present it in a final form for your consideration. Corrie: That would be the 18th of June. Rountree: Mr. Mayor, I move that we table the preliminary plat on the Lake at Cherry Lane No. 5 until our next regularly scheduled meeting June 18. Bentley: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree, second by Mr. Bentley that the preliminary plat be tabled until the next meeting June 18, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #3: TABLED MAY 7, 1996: FINAL PLAT: FIELDSTONE MEADOWS NO. 5 SUBDIVISION BY GARY VOIGT: Corrie: Councilmembers you have in your packet a request to table this, they asked for an indefinite time, I don't think we can do that we have to have a time. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, in that case I would move that we table it until our meeting of July 2nd. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree that the final plat hearing be tabled until July 2nd meeting, any further discussion? Opposed? COMMENTS MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: JUNE 4.1986 APPLICANT: STEINER DEVELOPMENT ITEM NUMBER; 2 REQUEST; PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE N0.5 AND DISCUSSION OF REQUIREMENTS IN FINDINGS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: ~`~ xw CJ l ~~ ~~ ` ~ ~ i ~~' ~a i ~,QP r~~"~ ~~~,y X31 ~ 6 ~~,~ ~~ ~S ~ gay""` ~b ~ ,~ ~`'k~,,y~ . ~~ 6''~' ~4~1 Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. • • ~~~EOV~ EBERLE, BERLIN, KADING, TURNBOW & MCKLVE~~ DF ~AER1DIAr~ CHARTERED ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW STEPHEN A. BRADBURY Mayor Robert Come Meridian City Council 33 East Idaho Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 CAPTfAL PARK PLAZA 300 NORTH SIXTH STREET PosT OFFICE Box 1368 BOISE, IDAHO 83701 May 31, 1996 TELEPHONE (208) 344-8535 FACSIMILE (208)344-8542 JAMES L. BERLIN OF COUNSEL T.H. EBERLE (1922-1977) Re: Request for Reconsideration on Conditional Use Permit for The Lake at Cherry Lane No. S Dear Mayor Corrie and Members of the City Council: I write in order to provide you with additional information in support of Steiner Development's Request for Reconsideration of the City Council's Apri12, 1996, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on its application for a conditional use permit for a planned unit development for The Lake at Cherry Lane Subdivision No. 5. You will recall that in connection with that application, Steiner Development requested relief from certain of the standard setback requirements applicable to residential structures in an R-15 zone. In approving the conditional use permit, the City Council granted some of the requested setback relief (that is, reducing the front yard setbacks from 20 to 15 feet) but denied the request that street side yard setbacks be reduced from 20 to 15 feet. By my letter dated April 16, 1996, I requested that the City Council permit Steiner Development an opportunity to discuss the street side yard setback further and attempt to demonstrate to the City Council that a reduction of that setback would not be injurious to the City or the public. It appears to us that there are at least two reasons why the City might seek to require a relatively large street side yard setback. First, the City is likely to be concerned about the safety of the traveling public in maintaining reasonable sight lines across corner lots, which sight lines might be lost if structures were built too close to the street. Second, the City probably would like to maintain an open and spacious appearance along its rights of way, which appearance might also be lost if homes were built too close to the street. In this case, however, we think we can solve both of those problems even with a 15 foot street side yard setback. • Mayor Come and City Council May 31, 1996 Page 2 Attached to this letter is a drawing of the proposed subdivision plat showing the location of the proposed dwelling structures on each lot. Also depicted on this drawing is the location of the proposed street improvements, including sidewalks, curbs, and gutters. At each of the corners in the subdivision is also shown the location of the vision triangle as required by Idaho Code § 49-221. As you can see, except on just two lots where the homes slightly encroach into the vision triangle (by a matter of a few inches) a 15 foot side yard setback is sufficient to meet the requirements of the state statute. Also attached is a drawing taken from Ada County Highway District's policy manual depicting the sight triangle which it requires on streets to be dedicated to it as well as a drawing taken from the City of Meridian Subdivision Ordinance depicting the sight triangle required by the city (which, by the way, is actually smaller than that imposed by the Ada County Highway District). In addition, the Council may recall that the road right of way width approved by the Council is 42 feet, only 37 of which, however, is to be improved (28 feet of asphalt, two feet on each side of curb and gutter and five feet of sidewalk on one side). That, of course, leaves five feet of unimproved road right of way which might be used to supplement the street side yard setbacks. If the road improvements were constructed on the road right of way as depicted on the drawing attached to this letter so that the improvements were located within one foot of the lot line adjacent to the sidewalk, there would be an additional four feet of unimproved right of way in the areas colored in green on the attached drawing. As you can see, that additional four feet of unimproved area is adjacent to the very corner lots for which Steiner Development seeks 15 foot side yard setbacks. If approved for construction in that fashion, there would be a total of 19 feet between any structure and an adjacent side street, effectively providing fora 19 foot street side yard setback. Recognizing that there is not likely to be a great deal of traffic on these streets (since none of them are through streets and they serve only the proposed senior citizen housing project) it appears to Steiner Development that an effective 19 foot street side yard setback should be sufficient to satisfy the City's concerns. It is with these thoughts in mind that Steiner Development requests that the City Council reconsider its decision and approve a 15 foot side yard setback .for the corner lots located in The Lake at Cherry Lane Subdivision No. 5. Very truly yours, SAB: jkr cc: Shari Stiles Gary Smith Doug Campbell Sandy Clay '~~ Stephe A. Bradbury 49-221 MOTOR VEHICLES 60 49-221. Removal of traffic hazards. - (1) It shall be the responsibil- ity of the owner of real property to remove from his property any hedge, shrubbery, fence, wall or other sight obstructions of any nature except buildings and trees where these sight obstructions constitute a traffic haz- ard. The above sight obstructions shall not extend more than three (3) feet in height above the existing center line highway elevation within the vi- sion triangle of vehicle operators. The boundaries of the vision triangle are defined by measuring from the intersection of the edges of two (2) adjacent highways forty (40) feet along each highway and connecting the two (2) points with a straight line. The sight distance obstruction is also applicable to railroad-highway grade crossings with vision triangle defined by mea- suring forty (40) feet along the railroad property line. (2) When the department or any local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that a traffic hazard exists, it shall notify the owner and order that the hazard be removed within fifteen (15) days. (3) The failure of the owner to remove the traffic hazard within fifteen (15) days shall constitute a misdemeanor and every day the owner shall fail to remove the obstruction shall be a separate and distinct offense. [1988, ch. 265, § 17, p. 549.] Compiler's notes. This section was for- merly compiled as 49-593 and was amended and redesignated by § 17 of S.L. 1988,. ch. 265 to become this section. The history of former § 49-593 is as fol- lows: [I.C., § 49-593, as added by 1977, ch. 152, § 2, p. 337; am. 1982, ch. 353, § 21, p. 874.] Former § 49-221, which comprised 1951, ch. 55, § 5, p. 79; am. 1957, ch. 38, § 1, p. 72; am. 1969, ch. 210, § 1, p. 611; am. 1977, ch. 122, § 1, p. 261; am. 1978, ch. 285, § 2, p. 692, was repealed by S.L. 1980, ch. 246, § 1, effective May 1, 1980. 49-222. Rights of owners of real property. -Nothing in this title shall be construed to prevent the owner of real property used by the public for purposes of vehicular travel by permission of the owner, and not as a matter of right, from prohibiting such use, or from requiring other or differ- ent or additional conditions than those specified in this title, or otherwise regulating such use as may seem best to the owner, except as provided in section 49-213, Idaho Code. [1988, ch. 265, § 18, p. 549.] Compiler's notes. This section was for- merly compiled as § 49-594 and was amended and redesignated by § 18 of S.L. 1988, ch. 265 to become this section. The history of former § 49-594 is as fol- lows: [I.C., § 49-594, as added by 1977, ch. 152, § 2, p. 337.] Former § 49-222, which comprised 1951, ch. 55, § 6, p. 79, was repealed by S.L. 1980, ch. 246, § 1, effective May 1, 1980. 49-223. Sale of nonconforming traffic-control devices. - A person shall not sell nor offer for sale any sign, signal, marking or other device intended to regulate. warn or guide traffic unless it conforms with the adopted state manual and specifications. [1988, ch. 265, § 19, p. 549.] 61 Compiler's notes merly compiled as 4 and redesignated b} 265 to become this The history of for lows: [I.C., § 49-59E 152, § 2, p. 337.] 49-224, 49-225. Compiler's not which comprised I. 1957, ch. 199, § 4, 1 § 2, p. 611, was re 265, § 3, effective 49-226. Film -.It shall be w affidavit as req. false or mislea Compiler's note merly compiled amended and rede 1988, ch. 265 to t The history of fc 49-227. Op who shall oper. and with inten vehicle, witho~~ meanor. The c shall not in ar. sent on a prey: same or a dif accessory to or also be guilty shall include, Code, boats, a: cles, hot air b~ § 21, p. 549; Compiler's nc merly compiled amended and re 1988, ch. 265 to The history of lows: [1927, ch. § 48-131.1 Former § 49-= ch. 90, § 3, p• 20~ ch. 265, § 3, eff Construction. • ~ Fence Regulation 9-617 A~ CITY OF MERIDIAN INSIDE LOT Property Line T28 Merldlan Street / / 888-4d33 ~ ~ 6' Solid or Open Fence ' tl~ Behind Set Back • I~ ~,I t I~ Property ~• ; ~,' ~ " I 1 Line ~~~ ~• ;,~ • ~I:. S ;~~~~li • ;I ~ .. ~ ~ ' ~, ~ I ~ Property , ~••~ il! t• ~ ;~ line-~• ~~ -~ ' ail: II• i i / ~ i,t. it / ~ ~ tl /~ ~' T 3' Solid Fence ' ~ ,~~ 20' Setback or 4 Open ~~ ~ ° / 4 ' x 4 ' ground TYPe Fence / , ~~eet area In Front of Setback~~ ~S ,. ~~~ • ~ \ , Leave Open Access to tilater Meters, Fence Regulation ~ Fire Hydrant, ,, CORNER LOT ~ ~ / Power Transformers, etc: I 6' Wood, Solid or Open Fence Property Line ~ ~ , ~II'i I t r i~ / ~ I `~7 0 ~ / /i• is / ~, - , ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ / ~ ~ / Z0' Setback ~ •~ -3' Wood or Solid Fence ° 3' Wood or Solid Fence Open Fence or 4' Open Fence 30' x ,~,i0, ~ S`teeti~ 3' Chain Link or Open Fence x 4' r groun ar -46- Leave Open Access to Water Meters, I Fire Hydrant, EXHIBIT "D„ Power Transformers, etc. 1191 t - nz axn~z3 I _~ Q I S S Z A ~~_ ~ Z ~ N O --~ C = --~ m=om A ~ ~ -) 7D D 02 ~mrn 0 O O 2 a 0 -I r z i i I ~~ i ~_ I ~S v O ~~ m z -i W C71 S w N q W W N N ~1 N ~ O ~ ca O O ~ r A ?< .9 ~IWItM n znp~rn ~ o c '~ Z tlI m ~ --~ v o m m ~' }'~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l / O ~ ~ ~ 1 _ ={m~i0 ~ O~DZ Z Z cn (n C7 ~ (T1 ~1 m O Tf ~° p O ~ _ 7 A N~ e ~, W 3 a a o o '" a o c ~ ~ v s a o 0 ~~ O ~• A ~O 0 y ~ 1 a -C« ~ A o -~ 0 0 1 ..~ • ~ ~~ avox 3'IIY1 N3,L 'N G '_' ~ ,-, ~-., _ ~~ t 1 i _ ~ .._.__~ i - - -~ -- I - _ . ... . ~~ i ~ a m E i i . ~ N W c. l0 k _ ~~. ~ ~ M - .. _ I r n r--~ _ ~ i i ~. = ~ ~ ~_ _ I ~ I I I 1 ~ i ~_~~ y I ~ i i _~I o ~ i i ~ ' Z ~ i, ' I i ~~ _ --~ I ~i i ~ I~ .~, o q= - i_ ~~~ I i , ~ j I r- 1 I - ` __ ~~ j b ~ / - t 'i _ r i -'_ - ~ i '._J~~ ~~\\ /-~ j ` e AYY 017Y ' / \ ~ ~~ ~ J,NON N ~~ ~ ~ r ~~ O 1 I _ v1 • J ~ ~ - Z ~ J N U -- ~ _ I ~. i ~ - ~ v7 F ~ ~ ~ ~ i I m i --rte • i h ~ I I '' - I^ ~ 2 W ; I I ~~ ~ - ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ - _ ~ C - G f f `f c ~ i ~ ' I~ ~ 1 ~ s -~.J i ~ '. ~ i ~ ~l _- I k , (1 i _ ~ W ~ I O _ •,~ m - r r ~~ I ...f= - _ z 'm o N S ~ i ~ ~ i 9 i _ _ i ~~ ~ '_ ~ i , , - ~ i ~+ `~ ~' < , i" i AVY H138YZVN 'N - .__. ~ U ~~ ~ -~ - '-'~ -__. _ .-_. ..- _ ~ ~_ -_ I . i va I - i - _ - - i ~ -- i -J l ._ i ~ -_ 4 9 4 0 Z. Z'ZCS 3 .. 00 N i r Meridian City Council May 7, 1996 Page 15 on whatever solution we came up with for this problem. So it seems to me to make more sense to table this until the July 16th or thereabouts to give us time to implement a committee to do the study and take advantage of any changes we might opt to make. At that point in time we do new findings based on what the policy or the ordinance restructuring is going to be. Crookston: I think that it is mandatory that we keep the hearing open for whatever length of time you want to deal with it. But we have to keep it open to allow any additional testimony if there is, there may not be any. But if you are going to have workshops and things of that nature to change the ordinance or to have additional facts on that I think that you still need to leave this hearing open so that you can receive testimony on those from the workshops. Morrow: And tabling keeps the hearing open is that correct? Crookston: That is correct. Morrow: I move we table until July 16. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion has been made and seconded that we table the public hearing until July 16, 1996, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Crookston: Do you want a notice done for the July 16 meeting to give the public an opportunity to come forward? Corrie: I think you would have to counselor? Morrow: We have to notice it but we don't have to make that decision until some time in June. Crookston: That would be true. Morrow: So let's make it in June when we see how we are progressing in terms of the study. ITEM #3: TABLED APRIL 2, 1996: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. 5 BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT: DISCUSSION OF REQUIREMENTS IN • • Meridian City Council May 7, 1996 Page 16 FINDINGS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: Corrie: You have in your packet Council a request that they also for reconsideration of the findings of fact and also for the preliminary plat to be tabled-until June 4. Morrow: So moved Rountree: Second Cowie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree that we table the preliminary plat until the June 4 meeting, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #4: TABLED APRIL 16, 1996: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR DOVE MEADOWS NO. 2 SUBDIVISION BY DAVE LEADER: Morrow: Mr. Mayor, on a presentation that we have from staff, item 4 it says preliminary plat for Dove Meadows No. 2 by Dave Leader, comment is still remaining are the issues of the 20 foot planting strip requirement on Hickory, progress in tiling of the ditch along the northern boundary and the landscaping and irrigation. We have not received any additional information, could we have, as I recall the reason for tabling was those four items and the resolution of those. Shari you are,indicating that there has been no progress made on the part of the applicant on all of those four items. Stiles: Councilman Morrow, Mayor and Council I am not aware of the progress if there has been any made. I know they were talking about tiling that ditch in cooperation with Wingate Subdivision but I still think that is an issue that needs to be taken care of prior to approval. And to the irrigation, maybe their representative is here and could address some of those items. Morrow: Mr. Mayor that would be my preference. Con-ie: Is there a representative, I think I saw Dave Leader here. Leader: I think there is a representative here I don't know where he is. Morrow: My question would be the four items that, when you were here last were as Shari alluded to is what has been the resolution of the ditch along the northerly boundary and the landscaping and irrigation issues and the 20 foot planting strip? • • Meridian City Council April 16, 1996 Page 9 have been going to conferences, and this year the northwest chapter will have their annual chapter meeting and training session over in Yakima, Washington in September. It is a 3 day affair and it is great. You meet all kinds of city planner and how to work and protect trees. Also as Dorothy mentioned in order to get some of the grants for Tree City USA you need to have matching funds, the work that we do in your City limits to remove and replace trees will count as matching funds for grants. So when you go to apply for the Tree City USA grants make sure you contact me and 1 will give you the dollars that we spend and you can use those for your matching funds.. As I mentioned we would be more than happy to buy you some new trees if your Parks Department wants to go out and look at the schools, the cemeteries, wherever you see overhead lines where kids may be and let's get some new small trees planted to eliminate somebody else coming in and planting a large growing species at a later date. Tree City USA author I brought a copy of one of the Tree City USA publications is Dr. James Fasio and fortunately he is from the University of Idaho and he writes the national publication that all cities are following. This also has a copy of the (inaudible) proper pruning of trees and a little article about the City of LaGrande (inaudible) $500 for stripping down trees. There is an Idaho overhead line safety act that has the $500 penalty for anybody working within 10 feet of the power lines unless they are qualified to work around energized lines. As far as I am concerned the $500 means nothing if they are not around. We do have some new brochures to give out to the customers prior to us contacting them which is why I wanted to come tonight to let you know the new procedures and new standards and that we do work with customers to remove trees also. A lot of them are just self starters. Here is a brochure that the City of Boise put in their sewer bill talking about stopping tree topping, mulching, watering, saving water and then another brochure on avoiding utilities. That is all I have, any questions? Corrie: Any questions from Council? Jack, thank you very much. At this time I would like to recognize the scout troop that is here tonight, welcome fellahs and hope you get some real pointers on the City government tonight. ITEM #3: TABLED APRIL 2, 1996: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. 5 BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT: Corrie: I believe you have in your packet that they requested tabling the preliminary plat until a later date. Do you have that in your packet? Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we table that as per requested by Steven Bradbury the preliminary plat for The Lake at Chevy Lane No. 5 until May 7, 1996. Rountree: Second Corrie: Okay, we have eight public hearings that night as well, we could put it the 21st if i • Meridian City Council April 16, 1996 Page 10 you so desire but if you want to leave it the 7th that is perfectly alright. Morrow: My preference would be to deal- with the issue as it comes and to get it cleared. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree, to table until May the 7th meeting, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #4: TABLED APRIL 2, 1996: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ASHFORD GREENS NO. 2 BY BRIGHTON CORPORATION: Corrie: Does the Council have any discussion before we take up the findings of fact and conclusions? Is the representative here, I have one question. On Interlachen what are the plans for that street that go into your subdivision? Wardle: Mr. Mayor in the original approval of the conditional use permit we were required to deal with a connection but until that parcel through which that must pass to make the connection is actually put into design mode it is premature to determine what that might be. ACRD was reluctant to have a connection for fear that it would put traffic on Interlachen that they never anticipated. So whatever is done is going to have to be done with the City staff as well as ACHD. Corrie: Thank you Morrow: Mr. Mayor, for the record in the findings of fact and conclusions there is a reference to the deed for the golf course property to bring the Council up to speed the first draft of the second deed or second time around yesterday afternoon and that is being reviewed so that is under progress as we speak. Corrie: Mr. Morrow did they take off the restrictions that were on there previously? Morrow: That is correct. Corrie: Any further discussion? Rountree: I have a question Mr. Mayor, the delivery of that warranty deed does that meet the terms of Item 18 on page 23 of the findings of fact, actually page 24 with (inaudible) Crookston: I have not seen the deed myself so I don't know. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: MAY 7 1996 APPLICANT: STEINER DEVELOPMENT ITEM NUMBER; 3 REQUEST; PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO 5 SUBDMSION AG NC COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: k~'' OTHER: III Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. SENT BY~ 4-16-96 ;11~41AM ; • ~®ERLE, BERLIN, KADING, TURNBQW ~c MCKLVEEN, CHARTERED ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW CAPITOL PARK PLAZA 300 NORTII $ixTH $TRCCT POST PRICE BO% 138g STEPHEN A. BRADpURY BOI$G~ IDAHO B37C11 April !6, 1996 TRANSMITTED VIA FACSIMILE Mayor Robert Come Meridian City Council 33 East Idaho Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 208 88'7 4813;# 2! 3 TlLEPMONE (E06) 344.8633 FACSIMILE (206) 344-6741 JAMEB L. BCALIN OF COVNBCL T, H. EBERLe ~Nilt•Ip71) Re: Request for Reconsideration on Conditional Use Permit for The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 5 Request for Tabling of Preliminary Plat for The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 5 Dear Mayor Come and Members of the City Council: You will recall that on April 2, 1996, you adopted Fiadings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Steiner Development's application for a conditional use permit for a planned unit development designated as The Labe at Cherry Lane Subdivision No. 5. You will also recall that in connection with that application, Steiner Development requested relief from certain of the standard setback requirements applicable to residential structures in an R-15 zone. In approving the conditional use permit, the City Council granted some of the requested setback relief (that is, reducing the front yard setbacks from 20 to 15 feet) but denied the request that street side yard setbacks be reduced from 20 to l5 feet. Steiner Development would like an opportunity to discuss the street side yard setback with the City Council further and attempt to demonstrate to the City Council that a reduction of that setback would be appropriate for this development. Accordingly, please treat this letter as Steiner Development's request for reconsideration of the City Council's April 2, 1996, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Steiner Development's application for a conditiona! use permit for a planned unit development for The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 5, insofar as those findings and conclusions denied Steiner Development's request for a reduction in the street side yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. I would appreciate it if you would make the necessary arrangements to have this request placed on the agenda of the Ciry Council's next regularly scheduled meeting which, I believe, is May 7, 1996. At that time, we will be prepared to present information to the Council demonstrating why the requested setback reduction should, be allowed. APR 16 '96 11 42 EBERLE, BERLIN-~ 2083448542 PAGE. 11 SENT BY~ 4-16-96 ;11~42AM ; Mayor Conie and City Council April 16, 1996 Page 2 208 887 4813;# 3/ 3 in addition, and in view of the above stated request for reconsideration, Steiner Development also asks that further consideration of the preliminary plat for The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 5 be continued until May 7, 1996, in order that the City Council will have an opportunity to address the setback issues. As you can no doubt appreciate, the layout of the plat is, at least in part, dependent upon the size of the setbacks applicable to the lots in that subdivision. It appears to us that further consideration of the preliminary plat may be inappropriate prior to final determination on the applicable setbacks. Your consideration of this request will be much appreciated. SAB:jlcr cc via tax: Cc via mail: APR 16 '96 11 43 Shari Stiles Gary Smith Will Berg Wayne Crookston Doug Campbell Sandy Clay EBERLE,BERLIN-~ 2083448542 PAGE. 12 SEN 208 887 4813 # 1/ 3 4-16-96 ~11~41AM EBERLE, BERLIN-~ i EBERLE, BERLIN, KADING, TURNBOW & McKLVEEN, CHARTERED 300 North Sixth Street Post Office Box 1368 Boise, Idaho 83701-1368 Telephone No.: (208) 344-8535 Facsimile No.: (208) 344-8542 FAX COVER SHEET DATE: Apri116, 1996 PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET: 3 TO: NUMBER: Will Berg 887-4813 FROM: Stephen A. Bradbury MATTER: Lake at Cherry Lane Subdivision No. 5 MEMO: Please see attached. If transmission is not properly received, please call Jeri at (208) 344-8535. *~~**~ 7'we rya eaud.d r~ mr, n.a~ard++ew b ouamepdMro errwtead, e~^nr oMr ew~+ ~hA- e~. ~r ~ruN r.~r~.~.r o~ e.ary ~..~.~ ~•. ~a~ ~.. al ~ to eer die Mradd ~vAM•.~. Y•~ w Aewe6y »wy-eA aher w7.Q.....Mad~w dlaM6adaw et utyyNB M dtle mwmadadan 4 enrahJa~^~• $fa Mwe ,w.Wwad rhb ~ M ernv. Pry' ~Y r AnmrcNuNly Ly eolker Hfe/M1ene rwA npell ek oNlwt wewape iu ro at dk el»~s ~v. ~r V.S. Afml. Ae Hflf nA.6reeY~Jb''P~+le• 7aenk Ynw APR 16 '96 11=41 2083448542 PAGE. 10 Mr SENT BY~EBERLE BERLIN h~ ;, , ~; :7 5- 7-96 ; 2~54PM ; Eberle Berlin- .. _.. EBERLE, ~E~LIN, KADING, TURNBOW & MCKLVEEN, ' CHARTERED ~ ~ j A'f'TmfiMETB ANp COUN>1LLOR>i AT LAW ~ I CAPITOL PARK PLAZA ~ ~ 300 NGRTM $IriTN $TI1~L~T j PD6T OFRIC6 BOx 13 ~ ~S1~PMCN A, BRAD6URY ~ i 1 8QIs6, IDAHO 8371 i 208 867 4613;it 2 TaL PNONE law) ~oa•seae FACSINILR laDlt) ~~~ee~a JA»ss L, btnuN ~ May 7, 1996 ; ~ m. ca~fusL ~ i , i i 'i ~~ TXtA1~S~iITTTD VW FACE 1`he Ht~norable Robert Come , 'j Mayon City of Meridian ! ~ ,~ 33 East Idaho Avenue i ' ! Mctidiatt, ID 83642 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ` ~. ;~ ~, Re: % ! Request for Reconsideration on Conditional Use Permit for The Lake at Ch ~ Lane No. 5 .Request for Tabling of Preliminary Plat for The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 5 Dear' Mayor Corrie: ..This follows and will confirm our telephone conversation of this date in wh ah you advised met~at due to scheduling problems,,the'City Council is not able to take up Steiner Development's Regt>~St for Reconsideration contained in my letter to you dated April 14, 1 ~ 96. It is my undetstanding that the City Councili will, instead, take the matter up during its June 4, 1996, meeting. Consequently, and in view of the scheduling of the Request for Recons>tderatioo, it would be al#propriate for the Council to continue further consideration of the preliminary plat until June. 4, 1996, as well. Thank you fvr your continued courtesy and consideration. In the event you would like to discus this proposal further, please feel free to give me a call. i V trul ~. SAB~jkr cc.vi~ fax: Shari Stiles '• ,' ~ Glary Smith . ~ Will Berg Wayne Crookston Doug Campbell evil mail: sanay clay ,, _ ,.,_._..~.r___r_._.^~__._ , MAY 07 '96 14 56 ery y yours, tephe A. Bradbury . .... 2083448542 PAGE.02 SENT BY~EBERLE BERLIN 5- 7-96 ~ 2~53PM Eberle Berlin- EBERLE, BERLIN, KADING, TURNBOW ~ 1V.~cK~LVE~N, CHARTERED ~~ ' ~~0 North Sixth Street -host Office Box 1368 ;Boise, Idaho 83701-1368 Te~~~hone No.: (208) 344-8535 acsiinile No..: (208) 344-8542 ;FAX 'COVER SHEET j DATE: May 7, 1996 PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET: 2 TO: Will Berg NUMBER: 887-4813 ' FRgM: Stephen A. Bradbury MATTER: Lake at Chevy Lane Subdivision No. 5 ME O: Please ~e ~ettadhed. Jf transmission is not properly received, please call Jeri at (208) 344- ****w~r ~ ea.mrst 6r ALLt nmanLstm 4.pme~+eA.w A'! eeMfowfO! ow Madsd mb !ir d6r ae r~Ne 6dWOd x ~' n.naf .bar. k nH do 1.wn1aA roclpknti Y~ sn MriS ~wQRef .1Y /rry Ywar.~.lyp, Qlnr!lmlar w agplsd C/dW ee~wir/crrar bJMtRfs ~Yss tra. ~ !rasa weAh - NaiwRmstj 6Y Dolt-r role~ila1r of Horn IM ai~rl nrw~ w r.r ae .her M<w,ts .b (1.6. A/ap. 1W wfll M-lee~e 7awlyr' 206 667 4613~ii 1 aNafar e/Ydo 'tlib sanrnwJaMrw ti SAaat rea ~~ ~~ i i i i I y.. . PAGE.01 MAY 0? '96 14 55 ~ 2083448542 SENT BY~EBERLE BERLIN ~ 5- 7-96 ~ 2~26PM ' ,~~ I' i • 206 967 4613~Ji 2 3~ Fist Idaho Avenue Mciidiati, ID 83642 Re; Request for Reconsideragpn on;Conditional Use Permit for The Lake at Cherry Lane No. ~' Request for Tabling of P~eli>~inary Plat for The Lake at Cherry Lane No. Doer Mayor Como: ,; This follows and will confirmiour telephone conversation of this date in wh h you advised me that due to scheduling problems, ,the City Council is not able to take up Steiner elogment';s Request for Reconsideration cuntai~ed in my letter to you dated April 16, 1 6. It is my undefstanding that the' Ciry Council' will, instead, take the matter up during its June 4, 1996, meeang. Consequesttly, and in view of the scheduling of the Request for Reconsid qn, it would be appropriate for the Council to continue further consideration of the prelimi ;plat until Juste 4, 196, as well. Thank you for your'continue~ courtesy and consideration. In the event yoit would like to discuss this proposal further, plestse feel free to give me a call. ~ M Y - 7 ~~ "~ i j JANq L. ~t1'L,N May 7, 1996 o. c~,NOlI~1„ 1 T. N. EmeALi QYYe~~g77) ?~ ~'. i ~ SMITThD VIA FACSA~Y.E i T~ Honorable Robert. Come. Mayor City of~ Meridian I ~ Eberle Berlin .• .. E9ERLE, ~FR~.IN, KADING, TURN6OW & MCKLVEEN,~ ~~°~Y ®~ ~`~~~~ I i ~ CHARTERED ~~ i A ONNtYp AND WUNB[L011S AT LAW ' ~ - CAPITOL PARK PLAZA ~ TEI-EPF~~FF~11~~ON6 ~~ 300 NOIITN 51MTN BTRLLT ~ (s44~ 94~A990 ~1,~! P09T ORVICt ®OII I'J!!6 P~¢ 1 0.1 ?T,[PN[N A. ~RAGAIJIIY ~ BOlst.. IDI~NO 031GI (i06~ 9~~86A4. SAB: jkr cc via fax: cc via mail: Shari Stiles Gary Smith. Will Berg Wayne Crookston Doug Campbell Sandy Clay Very truly yours, tephe A. Bradbury I ............__....._... _.,.. _... ...,_.__ -.1 _ ..- --_.~__w...----- -.. __._~ MAY 07 '96 14 30 2083448542 PAGE.02 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: APRIL 16.1996 APPLICANT: STEINER DEVELOPMENT ITEM NUMBER; 3 REQUEST; PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO 5 AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION; SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS ~~"~ r~~a~ sk ~ ~~ ~1, f ~~ OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. • IRRIGATION PIPELINE EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE is made between WILLIAM E. TETER and VIOLA M. TETER, husband and wife (hereinafter referred to as "Grantors") and STEINER DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., an Idaho limited liability company (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantors are the owners of certain real property located in Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described herein; and WHEREAS, Grantors desire to provide aright-of--way easement for an underground irrigation pipeline; and WHEREAS, the underground pipeline is to be constructed by Grantee; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary for Grantee to maintain and service the said pipeline from time to time; and WHEREAS, Grantors desire to provide a temporary easement for the construction of the said underground irrigation pipeline; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by Grantee, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto Grantee aright-of--way easement for the constnaction, operation and maintenance of one underground irrigation pipeline under and across all that real property described in Exhibit A hereto. Said pipeline is for the sole benefit of the real property immediately north and adjacent to the real property described on Exhibit A. The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of one underground irrigation pipeline, together with its maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of Grantee, with the reasonable right of access to such facilities at any reasonable time; provided, however, that in the event the surface of the easement area is disturbed or other damage occasioned as a result of Grantee's maintenance, repair or replacement of the irrigation pipeline, Grantee shall,. at its sole expense, expediently replace and restore the easement area to a condition comparable to that existent prior to undertaking such maintenance, repair, or replacement. There shall be only one imgation pipeline installed and once the original pipeline is installed, it shall not be relocated. This easement shall not be construed to provide Grantors with any right to place any structures on the surface of the easement premises except such manholes and manhole covers as may be reasonably necessary or required by governmental agencies to provide for the maintenance and cleaning of the irrigation pipeline. Grantors shall have no obligation to repair or maintain the said IRRIGATION PIPELINE EASEMENT - 1 • underground irrigation pipeline as provided for herein and in the event Grantors are required to undertake to repair or maintain the said pipeline, Grantee shall reimburse them their reasonable costs incurred thereby. Grantors do further hereby give, grant and convey unto Grantee a temporary construction easement over all that real property described in Exhibit B attached hereto, for the purpose of construct the said underground irrigation pipeline herein described, the same to expire and terminate on June 1, 1996, or when the initial construction is completed, whichever is sooner. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto that Grantee will timely complete the work of laying the underground irrigation pipeline and restoring the premises used therefore to a condition comparable with that existing prior to the undertaking of the construction of such underground imgation pipeline., TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said easements and right-of--way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns until such time as the said irrigation pipeline is no longer used for its intended purpose for a period of two years. GRANTEE shall hold harmless and indemnify Grantors and their successors and assigns from any claims, demands, or actions against them arising out of the use and occupation of the easement premises as provided for herein. In the event of any litigation between the parties hereto, Grantors shall be entitled to all attorneys fees incurred. GRANTORS DO HEREBY COVENANT AND AGREE that they will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures on the area described for this easement which would interfere with the use of the said described easement for the purposes stated herein as Exhibit A, but no provision of this easement shall in any way limit Grantor's use of the property except as specified herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantors have executed this instrument on the /~~ay of 1996. WII.LIAM E. TETER //r ~ ~~.~ ~--- .,Gd-CQ- ~i ,; ~ZCiy VIOLA M. TETER IRRIGATION PIl'ELINE EASEMENT - 2 • STATE OF IDAHO ) ss. County of Ada ) On this ~t'Eday of~~~~c.~/ , 1996, before me, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared William E. Teter and Viola M. Teter, husband and wife, known to me or identified to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and notarial seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary u ~c f da o Residing at: T ~ My Commission Expires: o, ~ o/ IItRIGATION PIPELINE EASEMENT - 3 StIV I tfY ~ cl~tHLt 13tf~L 1 N . .~ . 9EM' ~Y~ I • 5 ~• 1 •• •I ~i Z ;i ., I~ L~ - ~~ .' ~~ :. .; „ .,; :; i ~~ ' :~ . ii ' . . ' .. ~~ i ,, ,; . ~. ~• • ~r 1..: . , :; .: ' t. 7 i . ~., ,. . . .~ ~;.~. ~ , . ,'.i .i ,. ~:..I. ': . i' ' l7(~ ~, ass ; s:mot ; ~+o~a Rtrad 93 3;ti 4 ~Ri.E ~.,IiV~~ ,/ ~ • 4t ~ • ~ I .. '1 . '~ ~ '• • ' ~ ~ m taa~oa ~~uersre-dead : ~~zoa~iia~e~ooae: . PRR?7~CI; 32T1s9 ~ _-. DRlB; •N~u~4 11.1996 . 1 . j i ~~' . w T~ mar Q~Att:TllR OR']~ NioQtTt~A~i' Qrc1AxT~[t ' ~ ~ ~C[xOl+i 3, T.3Np ]f.1W., A.TV1. . ~m1tIDQA~ ADA ~'0~1TY. IDAHO A panel attend ]n;~h. oftNe 6o:rM.t Qa~ attbe Nonisstt 4~~ Seofloa ~, T. 3 N„ R. ] W', aM,, ciao, Ada Coue4i+~ iaaba ~ 111 tbee t3weeey a[euad aty~aant to the follosrinp dera~ibodtine ~ n+oro partieWr'iy deeb96ad as i6®ras: ~, :. . ~. .. ~Idnnm~ at aHQa cep m~kl~ Ibo $ellttaDpt Corner rdthe S'authease Qaetterof t1~e No~tesit ~ `~ . Querler o~9ecdae 3. T.3N, ~ R l W.. BM. ~eridl~, Ada Cpmt~q, id.ba; ` • ~ ~ , t6enoe s1oAg ibv t3ermmly bouorlary dseid 9oathqut Qtpnnr nittN Natdieq~t t3ea~; Nome ~: OtN~~'34" tut 13ss,91 i>setlo tM Ne.ehm.etoo~ dald $autt~ettait t~oerte~ dtlte Hortl~st tZulatd~ . ,, ~°°~ a~ - ~oiai tmi Yaps the Roetboii~r bonMary ota~id 5outti~at, t3wroe~ oP ~ Qwutor. t+larte ag~~00• Wc~ lulAd ~q is do itdt Rio medda6 d» l~Toedi~t O~ o[ add. Caaettheset Qdrnr ate 2~tQt6ast f,~weer. add 4aa- pis ekn tie NbtlLea~ aaeser of The g}lee At tt~aq_al.~tlae No. 3y~Siiolry~~als~ filled ~freeoarrd la tM dlll~oe o~t~e Jld~~c~a~emb~/re~rc}ryd/eyi;~ . ~~pp~~°°.66°.~~f ~~Wf IV d~fa~~ iWI ~7t~j~~~~t~~1~IGIW ;1M~7i 611E •~ ]tea ~Id Nenhar~ bmwe0ry and aloe6 theweeta~r ~oemA~eq of aw ^id tiontr~ . t~na:h~+o~tbe Nord+ceet Q~ andaGo ~ t5e Iot~dTlee Iaf<e At l'hcny i.ime No. S . ~ .. 8u~divislan, 8oum 00'9ti~• wex 9Q3.r1 tact 1o poha. ea[d paieit bda6 the potm oia ol't>ds . e..ea+c~e. ~ .. ;, . . ~ . >~-i owe +Md io.d>t ¢ ar sppea~dn6 m the a~cdeealbod ~ , ptroel el']attd. . `, .. :. ;: . ~.: ~~ . .. ,. ~ :. 'j , i !. 4 • I '. ' Dole O. 'n0. P,L.Ij. ' 1'rlaz'tta Lrisa , a disid•n o[MyW]C$ y lea, ea iloho lJorpoxatlo~a .• ' I;RHIBIT A . Eberle Beriin-- Prep~ect !~: Pad~io [paid Swvtyocs 5tN I t3Y ~ tf3tKLt tltNL! N . ~1U~' BY: .; . ~~ 3-12-9f3 Y~03PM ; ,. . . , Eberle f3erfin-+ P411~ ~S HO1JC~ 93f369428;it 5 F~,E .[. ~~ 2! .~ :.~a.. ffsaTe: lMrreh a 19lit+ • , ,~ , :. ~~ . ~ -• i ~. ~ }' • . ' IItil TE>'!s ladpl~gT Q17Ai~ t7F TIl3: ht~f9tl~Aa'T QUAR'IB1t . ~ . ~ • . ~ ~~ ' i , ' j ;3HG'1'>~19~ T ~T., Ift.1W.,1l.111. •~ ; .: ' ~~ 1, ADACOIfN'lY~ 1DA11~ A ptucet ad send is the:o[ tla sfi0utblert Qdwrppr oltAO NOnlheatt Qllgletor, }loClbn 9, T 7 N~ R i W:', ~ ~, - . . ~ ~ ~ a : fde6o~b met Berbdlr aPetiQ I~eoent eo t111e Ap deierlbe4 Ifs~e, . Iftegt~nia= aet a Aries 4ep'mertdo~ tM 8outtiePo comer oP the &t t d ~ Nretheart : ,' . , .I Qm~rter od•$ea~aai ~. T,~N.; R,1W.~ H.M,; Meddles, APIs Caamq, Id>rb; ~ °, I ~ i ~en~ ~ '~i7 at add.Saathea~t d t>te NecthetR Qnatler ~ NoAh .. '' ~ ~ . , •, Of~°Z#'S4 f°ad 1~25,9111~ b tbo NoctLerat co~eer' otlMid Qalaetre od the Neoth~tlt Qwnte~ , . I - I .~~ ~ ~.~ tab kavi~eef~d Sreleiflyb4uadigrsnd aloes the Natberty baendrry of tdd Soq>fq~R t~etecd " • ~ •the t'Qnaner. Necth i9~03~00' West 1321 Q4 Poet to In.it+~ pin meriahy t1~ Noettt~rest ~n~. ~ : - . I ~. . i of plil~ >9aatteesl Q~aMer o[ibe Noctbert 4oarty. a~W hen pin elmu ~orrldu` the Noaheast aamsr ed : ; ' The Laiaa Ilt Cherry l,tiw:IV~ 3 BuYSdtristoca ar med ~6or aecgrd hs the ad6oe a~~e dd! Ce~j neaoedee. , . ~ 8ole>a, rdati0. in Beolt 7~D d l?'lae~ ~ pines 7167 ~ 716t;, qid itea pda Leo fbei~ Ws R~L PQINr OF ~ ~ '• ~ ~ ' ' ! theeoo >o~nt odd xotl~, aea~e~ry •aa eaee~ th. We~a~y ba~edst7 of rb. WQ saotltueeot ~ . .; . ~ Qd.r~. aftba Nor#heaet tZeatier~ aed aho tie i' be~eandeq dThe like At Chong fnee Na 3. ~ ~ ~_ ' flebdfvLioo~ Soath 11q°hb'04" Weft 9?a.71 ~Dd >a pplot, Mid poid b~ the pobiE d ~ e~tma . i ~~+ rid eas,a~eet wlrN 6r oermigsbrd whee ooneatiwtion it aomplaad eAd ~ . ~:I d fbY ~> ownor. ~ ~ : . ~; ' I ~ .• ~! f r_ All Eltl~ eeesmeele and med . ~~~ ~tho . •I . ~ ~ :i .; ,~I ~:I .. ' ~'I ~ EXHIBITS B '~ ' . ..,i • ~ Dan a pl.,f1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . • Plwine I+md !lmsay~.., r n.tPDWI~ ~.*, ireN ~n ~Ai1'o C7~p~atien ~ ~ .. = •-r- - -.- . ~.... ~~~ ~ Aeolne L•nd ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ THE LAKE AT CHERRY N0. 3 aY3.~, S as" • aos.~, s oo• Za• o.~ r 00 ~ ! < ~ ~. P i i i ~ ~Q ~ ~A u~ Z auss c+~ erawrr i + N 002~'3s' E ~. w. si oa yen 1523.91 d ~ N : ~ o ~~ SEA ~ '~ ~ ~ Z ~ o 1 u ~ ~ ~ = 1'*1 r+~ ~~ ~~, z ~ ~~ ~; Rl m e~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ z N ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ } , • • Meridian City Council April 2, 1996 Page 17 Smith: The remainder I assume will be a landscaped area or grass or whatever. This street section if it is centered in the 42 foot right of way, it will put the back of the sidewalk right on the right of way line, the street section could be off centered so that there could be a small space adjacent to the back of sidewalk between the back sidewalk and property line, but nevertheless if it is centered it will fit. Corrie: Any other corrections? I will entertain a motion on the findings of fact and conclusions of law as corrected. Morrow: Mr. Mayor I would move we adopt and approve these findings of fact and conclusions of law as amended. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow,.second by Mr. Rountree that we approve the findings of fact and conclusions of law as amended, any further discussion? Roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Bentley -Yea, Rountree -Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that the City Council hereby decides that this application for a conditional use permit is approved under the conditions stated above as amended and these findings of fact and conclusions of law. And the conditional use approval is subject to all City ordinances specifically including but not limited to 11-9-607 design review, plat approval under the procedures of the subdivision and development ordinance and if all requirements or representations made are not met this approval shall be subject to cancellation and the property subject to de-annexation. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion is made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree on the decision, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #6: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE N0. 5 BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT: Corrie: The developer here would like to say something. r '~ ~ • Meridian City Council April 2, 1996 Page 18 Bradbury: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, the preliminary plat that you have before you was delivered to the City a little bit later than we what we had hoped we would be able to accomplish when we were here two weeks ago. It is my understanding although I have not had an opportunity to meet with him that the City Engineer has reviewed the pla# and has some concerns with respect tb some of the features of the plat. What we would like to ask you to do is table the matter for another two weeks in order to give us an opportunity to meet with the City Engineer and buff this thing up so we can take a rather unique approach to this and actually give you something to approve that is exactly right if we can get there. Morrow: So moved Bentley: Second Cowie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Bentley that the preliminary plat for the Lake at Cherry Lane No. 5 be tabled until April 16, all those in favor say aye? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #7: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ASHFORD GREENS N0.2 BY BRIGHTON CORPORATION: Cowie: We don't have the findings of fact and conclusions of law completed at this time, is that correct Mr. Crookston? We don't Crookston: That is correct Mr. Mayor, it is not that the City doesn't have them it is that the City Attorney did not find (inaudible) at 6:28 this evening. Cowie: I will entertain a motion to table the findings of fact and conclusions of law for Ashford Greens No. 2 until the next meeting April 16. Bentley: So moved Rountree: Second Cowie: Motion made and seconded that we table this item #7, all those in favor say aye? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #8: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ASHFORD GREENS NO. 2 BY BRIGHTON Meridian City Council March 19, 1996 Page 36 Campbell: Which this isn't, this is nothing new it happens in other cities. I know where you are coming from and I think it has to be a function or mechanism that the homeowners association has to handle and if there is a big function then they are going to have to handle it the best way they can. Even if they did double park the ideal situation, like I said we have the ideal situation with the one street parking even if someone did park on the other side there is still enough room for a fire truck to get through. It is just, the fire chief felt more comfortable going with the parking on one side and posting on the other side. We have agreed to that. Corrie: Any further questions for Doug or Steve? If there is no more public testimony I will close the public hearing, Council? Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I think from my perspective in terms of the findings of fact and conclusions of law that we have before us that were approved by P & Z there have been substantial changes or alterations to those findings of fact as proposed before us tonight and apparently some of which were discussed with P & Z by virtue of the minutes but are not part of the findings of fact. I would move then that we instruct the City Attorney to prepare new findings of fact and conclusions. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree that the City Attorney do findings of fact and conclusions of law, any further discussion? All those approved say aye? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #13: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. 5 BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT: Corrie: l will open the public hearing. Steve do you have anything else you want to cover on that one? Bradbury: Mr. Mayor I would simply ask that my testimony from the previous item be incorporated into the record for this item. I would be pleased to respond to any additional questions you may have. Perhaps one item and it may be just thinking that there might be concern in your minds with respect to do you have a preliminary plat before you or don't you. You do have a preliminary plat before that we are asking you to approve but with some changes as we have discussed them. Granted you do not have a drawing of those proposed changes that is true. The changes as we have discussed I think you could if you were inclined could approve the preliminary plat which is before you subject to those • • Meridian City Council March 19, 1996 Page 37 changes be made. That is what we would like to request that you do this evening. If .you have any questions of course I will. Corrie: Any questions for Steve? Staff? Thank you Steve. Rountree: I have one Mr. Mayor, when will the City be in receipt of a new preliminary plat? Bradbury: We hoped you would receive it today, unfortunately you did not. Doug do you have an idea from Keith about what the timing is going to be? (Inaudible) Campbell: We are trying to get the preliminary plat back here today with all of the changes that the P & Z requested. I don't think that we have made that many changes on the preliminary plat to where it is not a significant change but a few alterations that we have had to make to, for P & Z's recommendations. We just ran out of time, but we felt that we could work off of what you have here in front of you and then bring all of the corrections in and let the staff handle it at their level. Which I don't think I even answered your question, we will have it around this week. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I guess a comment here for our staff and Attorney, the Council and Mr. Campbell is that in the chain of events the preliminary plat is the most important document. I have a great reluctance to move forward with this until we have a corrected preliminary plat in front of us. So as a point of discussion 1 believe my position here will be on item 13 that it goes no further until we have a valid preliminary plat in hand and address those issues at that point in time. Rountree: Mr. Mayor I would move that we table action on this item until our next regularly scheduled meeting and we are in receipt of a preliminary plat. Morrow: Second Corrie: I will close the public hearing, a motion was made that we table the request for preliminary plat for the Lake at Cherry Lane No. 5 until the April 2nd meeting, all those in favor say aye? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Corrie: I will entertain a motion for a five minute recess. Morrow: So moved • Meridian City Council March 19, 1996 Page 38 Rountree: Second FIVE MINUTE RECESS • ITEM #14: PUBLIC HEARING: RE-QUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A 74 UNIT PUD WITH DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS FOR ASHFORD GREENS NO. 2 (FORMERLY JAMES PLACE): Corrie: I will now open the public hearing Mr. Wardle. Mike Wardle, 50 Broadway Avenue, Suite D, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Wardle: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, this project is similar in some respects to that that you just reviewed but substantially different in the planned character. I want to spend just a few minutes if we possible can so we don't belabor this evening. It is a little background, the location of this project for Ashford No. 2 is in the center part of the conditional use permit that the Council approved in December of 1994. This is actually the first of two medium density parcels. The parcel in the center was approved at that point conceptually for up to 8 units to the acre. Overall density of the project at that time as originally approved was 3.55 units to the acre including the medium density parcels. With this change as submitted this property is coming in at a density of approximately 4.9 units to the acre. We are going to show you a detached dwelling concept. So the overall density of the project is as a result also reduced. I guess there is probably nothing more on the overall site but this one simply shows the location and a layout that, I want to just quickly go through the fact that what we are going to talk about are again detached dwellings. The proposal as submitted to the Commission and as discussed anal as recommended for approval both as a conditional use permit and as a preliminary plat accommodates five different dwelling units ranging from 1225 square feet up to 1881 square feet. All of the information that was presented is in the packet that you received last week so I am trusting you will have read that if you have questions specifically we can go through but generally we are talking about just a variety of fairly traditional appearing dwellings, lap siding, shake roofs, and the floor plans. all of these floor plans and elevations are in blue print form in the files in your planning department. In addition these boards have been retained here during the hearing process and were there for review. I think it is probably more appropriate to look at the cluster concept that is being proposed. I would like to provide to the Council two different renderings. These are actually copies of the renderings that were submitted. to and reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. (Inaudible) Believe it or not through the modem technology the exact duplication of what we show as kind of a salmon pink here is kind of a faded out yellowish green on your copies. This is the technical site plan and I want to emphasize the fact that the architectural firm that designed the units has also designed the layout. They have placed the buildings they have ~J MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: MARCH 19.1996 APPLICANT: STEINER DEVELOPMENT ITEM NUMBER; '~~' REQUEST; PUBLIC HEARING• PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. 5 AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION; SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS P & Z MINUTES FROM 1-9-96 SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS 311~~/1 ~'~'l~~il SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ~ 2 SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ~~ OTHER: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. •~ •• Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission January 9, 1996 Page 26 Johnson: Anyone else from the Commission? Thank you Steve. This is a public hearing, anyone else from the public that would like to address the Commission at this time on this application? Seeing no one then I will close the public hearing. Hepper: Mr. Chairman, I move we have the City Attorney prepare findings of fact. Shearer: Second Johnson: Moved and second that we have the City Attorney prepare findings of fact on the application for the Lake at Cherry Lane Subdivision No. 5, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #11: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO.6 SUBDIVISION BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT: Johnson: I will now open the public hearing and invite Mr. Bradbury to come up for four times in a row. Steve Bradbury, 300 N. 6th Street, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Bradbury: I will just give the same presentation over again for you. What I would suggest that perhaps we do is simply agree to incorporate the comments I made in my previous presentation into the record into .this one and let it go at that unless you have any particular questions. Johnson: That is a good move thank you. Any questions from the Commission on the preliminary plat? This is a public hearing is there anyone that wants to address the Commission on the preliminary plat for this application? Seeing no one then and assuming you people are finished I will close the public hearing at this time. Shearer: Do you just want to table this until the next meeting? Johnson: That is about all we can do. Shearer: I move we table this item until the February 13th meeting. MacCoy: Second Johnson: We have a motion and a second to table item 11 until the February 13th meeting, all those in favor? Opposed? ~~ ~~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission January 9, 1996 Page 27 MOTION CARRIED: All Yea TEN MINUTE BREAK ITEM #12: PUBLIC HEARING: .REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR DOVE MEADOWS SUBDIVISION N0. 2 BY DAVE LEADER: Johnson: I will now open the public hearing and invite Mr. Leader or his representative to come forward and address the Commission. Ted Hutchinson, Tealys Land Surveying, 109 S. 4th Street, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Hutchinson: Mr. Chairman and members of the Commission, this is the second phase of Dove Meadows No. 2, as you recall the original portion of this when it was approved did expire and we have now completed the application and brought it forward to you in this form. There is a slight change from the original form thaf was reviewed and approved by this body and that is on the northwest end. Originally there was a stub street that went to the west to the Avest property, however because of the changes in the development plan on that property we have looped the street and connected it up and also have connected with the stub street into Wingate Place Subdivision No. 2. We have reviewed the comment sheet from Bruce Freckleton in the City Engineer's office.. We responded in writing to his comments and submitted the amended preliminary plat, I believe you should have that before you today. We have gone through those comments, we have no problem with complying at those comments with the exception of I believe it is lots 3 and 4 of Block 3 we do have a problem with the frontage on those because it is on a curve. Johnson: This is item #3 on the site specific comments? Hutchinson: Site specific comments from Mr. Freckleton. Lots 3 and 4 of Block 3, Lots 21, 20 on Block 2 have been adjusted so that they do have the proper frontage on the revised plat. Lots 3 and 4 because they are on the outside of the curve we are unable to get the 65 feet of frontage at the street line. They are a little bit closer if you are at the setback line however we are going to have to request a variance from the street frontage standard and that application will be forthcoming. The lots do, Lot 3 I believe is about 9000 square feet, Lot 4 is 8000 square feet or vice versa I can't recall exactly which one is which. They are both in excess of 8000 square feet. So they are good sized lots just because the way that curve happens on the street that it is a little difficult to meet the frontage requirement. Johnson: How much is a little difficult? WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATNA. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chfef WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor MEMORANDUM: To: Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning From: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer Re: THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. b ? {Preliminary Plat/Conditional Use - By Steiner Development) COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW P & Z COMMISSION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman MOE ALIDJANI JIM SHEARER CHARLIE ROUNTREE TIM HEPPER January 5, 199b 1 have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, for your information and consideration as conditions of the Applicant during the hearing process: GENERAL COMMENTS l . Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project, shall be tiled per City Ordinance l 1-9-b05.M. The ditches to be piped are to be shown on the Preliminary Plat. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate imgation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Determine the seasonal high groundwater elevation, and submit a profile of the subsurface soil conditions as prepared by a soil scientist with the street development plans. 4. Submit copy of proposed restrictive covenants and/or deed restrictions for our review. 5. Provide 5 foot wide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-9-b06.B. b. Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names. Make any necessary corrections to the Preliminary Plat map prior to resubmittal to the City. 7. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian's Water Works Superintendent. C:\WPWIN60\GENERAL\LAKE;r6. PBcZ M • Mayor, Council and P&Z January 5, 199b Page 2 $. Indicate any existing FEMA Flood Plain Boundaries on the Preliminary Plat Map, and/or any plans to reduce said boundaries. 9. Submit a master street drainage plan, including the method of disposal & approval from the affected irrigation/drainage district. 10. Off street parking shall be provided in accordance with Section l 1-2-414 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements. ll. Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Sections 11-2-414.D.4 and 11-2-414.D.5 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act {ADA) requirements. 12. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted for all off-street parking areas and shall be approved by the City Engineer {Ord. 557, 10-1-91). 13. Outside lighting shall be designed anti placed so as to not direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-2-414.D.3. l4. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section l 1-2-415 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. 15. Respond in writing, to each of the comments contained in this memorandum, and submit with copies of the revised Preliminary Plat Map to the City Clerks Office prior to the scheduled hearing date. SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS• 1. Revise the Preliminary Plat to include the source for the pressurized irrigation system. System shall be designed such that no lateral lines run parallel within the street right-of- ways. Crossings from block to block will be allowed. Any proposal for a supplementary connection from the City's water system to the pressurized irrigation system being proposed will need to be reviewed closely due to the size of the area to be watered. Applicant shall provide a statement as to the ownership of and operation/maintenance of the pressurized irrigation system. C:\WPWIN60\GENERAL\IAKE#6.P&Z ~ ~ Mayor, Council and P&Z January 5, 199b Page 3 2. 100 watt high pressure sodium street lights will be required at locations designated by the Meridian Public Works Department. All street lights shall be installed, at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 3. The Meridian Fire Department and Meridian School District need to review and approve of the travel way widths. I am concerned about the narrower width of the roadways as it will make it more difficult to navigate with school busses and emergency vehicles. As an absolute minimum, "No Parking" signs should be posted along one side of the street. I don't know how enforcement of the "No Parking" will be accomplished. 4. The treatment capacity of the City of Meridian's Wastwater Treatment Plant is currently being evaluated. Approval of this application needs to be contingent upon our ability to accept the additional sanitary sewage generated by this proposed development. 5. Many concept versions of this project have been submitted to the City of Meridian over the last year or so. Shari Stiles and I reviewed and submitted comments to the Planning and Zoning Commission for the Preliminary Plat of the Lake at Cherry Lane No's. 5 & bon March 10, 1995. There were eight General Comments, eleven Site Specific Comments -Public Works, and ten Site Specific Comments -Planning Department. Prior to the City Council meeting of October 1?, 1995, I reviewed my files to try and determine if our review comments had been addressed by the applicant. On October 13, 1995, I prepared a memorandum to the City Council in which I requested that the Preliminary Plat for the Lake at Cherry Lane No. 5 & b be tabled until we receive and review a Preliminary Plat map that represented the most current proposal as well as address all of our comments. City Council approved the Plat at the October 17, 1995 meeting with the conditions that a note be added to the Preliminary Plat map regarding the R-4 Zone along the southerly boundary and meeting the staff conditions. To this date I still don't have a revised Preliminary Plat map that has been revised to show the "three zone concept" nor have all of Shari's and my comments been addressed. The Approved Preliminary Plat indicates that there will be two phases to this project, the phase line shows that the project will be divided in more or less anorth-south fashion. From the Plat map I assume that one would be "The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 5" and the other would be "The Lake at Cherry Lane No. b". The application before you doesn't include the north portion of what I assume was presented as being "The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 6"; therfore it is not in conformance with the Approved Preliminary Plat. I respectfully request that a condition of this application be that the applicant address all of our previous comments and submit a Preliminary Plat Map that represents the current development proposal. C:\WPWIN60\GENERAL\I.AI~NG.P&Z WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor MEMORANDUM: TO: Planning & Zoning C 'ssion/Mayor and City Council FROM: S les, P& Administrator COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW P & Z COMMISSION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman MOE ALIDJANI JIM SHEARER CHARLIE ROUNTREE TIM HEPPER January 8, 1996 SUBJECT: Request for Conditional Use Permit with Preliminary Plat for The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 6 by Steiner Development As is common in a planned development, exceptions can be made by Council to district regulations when they are desirable to achieve the objectives of the proposed PD. "9-607 E MODIFICATION OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS A PD shall be allowed only as a Conditional Use in each district subject to the standards and procedures set forth in this Section. A PD shall be governed by the regulations of the district or districts in which said PD is located. The approval of the Final Development Plan for a PD may provide for such exceptions from the district regulations governing use, density, area, bulk, parking, signs, and other regulations as may be desirable to achieve the objectives of the proposed PD, D1UVIded such exceptions are consistent with the standards and criteria contained in this Section. " Variances/exceptions that would need to be approved to grant this CUP in an area zoned R-4/R-15 as presented would be: 1. Minimum lot sizes 2. Frontages 3. Minimum roadway widths/private drives 4. Parking areas closer than 4' from road right-of--way; depths less than Ordinance requires 5. Provision of 5' sidewalks on each side of roadway in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-9-606.B. 6. Front and side yard setbacks (5' per story on side) • P&Z Commission, Mayor and Council January 5, 1996 Page Two The preliminary plat has been submitted as "The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 6" . This should be changed to "The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 5". Although the preliminary plat was originally submitted showing this CUP area as Lot 10, Block 11, with the phasing line shown as dividing the property into west and east sections, the Applicant's intent is to develop all of the property shown as being south of Teter Boulevard as "The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 5" and the property north of Teter Boulevard as "The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 6. " Applicant needs to submit the following additional. information: 1. Colored rendering of adequate scale to show the completed development that will include at least the following: a. Architectural style and building design (provided); b. Building materials and color (provided); c. Detailed landscape plan showing sizes and species, particularly for 20' planting strip along Ten Mile Road; d. Screening; and e. Garbage areas. 2. Ada County Street Name Committee approval letter. 3. Proposed restrictive covenants/deed restrictions. 4. Master street drainage plan. 5. ACRD Technical Review Committee approval. 6. Indicate minimum house size on plat. 7. Permanent perimeter fencing to be in place prior to obtaining building permits. 8. Recreation center to be completed as part of initial development. 9. Submit approval from Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District/Ada County Highway District for pressurized irrigation/drainage plan. Will ACHD take responsibility for proposed drainage pond, or will this be maintained by the Homeowners Association. • • P&Z Commission/Mayor and Council .January 8, 1996 Page Three 10. Provide detail of pedestrian walkway/golf cart access currently shown on Lot 14, Block 11, as well as gates proposed within the development. 11. No Parking areas to be enforced by Homeowners Association. Parking may need to be prohibited adjacent to landscape islands and allowed on one side of street only in other areas. WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANIC~L. GASS, City Treasurer ,GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney . HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY ~ COUNCIL MEMBERS " A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON WALT W. MORROW 33 EAST IDAHO p & Z COMMISSION MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman MOE ALIDJANI Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 JIM SHEARER Motor Vehicle/Drivas License (208) 888-4443 CHARLIE ROUNTREE TIM HEPPER GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning S< Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: anuary 2. 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 12/18/95 HEARING DATE: 1/9/96 REQUEST: Preliminary Plat for The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 6 Subdivision BY: Steiner Development LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Immediately east of the Lake at Cherry Lane No. 3 Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z GREG OSLUND, P2 TIM HEPPER, P/Z BOB CORRIE, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C!C WALT MORROW, C/C GLENN BENTLEY, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PR LIM ~ FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAM (PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES G~ OTHER: /" YOUR CONCISE REMA S: t~~C'_Ir_~° CITY D~ ~ERIDI~-'~ HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY ILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk ICE L. GASS, City Treasurer ~ D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney A Good Place to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON CITY O~ MERIDIAN WALT W. MORROW 33 FAST IDAHO P & Z COMMISSION MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 MOE AUDJANI Public WorksBuildirrg Department (208) 887-2211 JIM SHEARER Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 CHARLIE ROUNTREE TIM HEPPER GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: anuary 2, 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 12/18/95 HEARING DATE: 1/9/96 REQUEST: Preliminary Plat for The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 6 Subdivision BY: Steiner Development LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Immediately east of the Lake at Cherry Lane No. 3 Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z GREG OSLUND, P2 TIM HEPPER, P/Z BOB CORRIE, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C GLENN BENTLEY, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: Ia ` ~ 7 ` ~~ YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: CITY ATTORNEY B r hJr. i 5 .~ ocy n1 olV fke CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER " ~4r ~ n.r~ oa ~f~~- p~/QJLd~.J o S, D i .u : ~ S .~ D ~.c, r~ d hl 7F" ~ r• i / Irl- ~ 14 ~.- - FCJ~~~J1~~ `t~ `-e e 1 u. ~ f~ o u- s E . + 1 7 R,~; n .:1~1 $ U1 ~~Lty~~dr S~RINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Bob L. Haley DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT spa EXCEL` Dan Mabe, Finance 8~ Administration E` ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT G7 'yam Christine Donnell, Personnel & Instruction ? ~1~~\~/~~ 1 en DIRECTORS ~ J ,~ ~` Sheryl Belknap, Elementary Q Jim Carberry, Secondary ~ Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911MERIDIANSTREET • MERIDIAN,IDAH083642 • PHONE(208)888-6701 1! a~"~" January 2, 1996 ~~~~° ~~ ]~;y~~~~'~r. City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 6 Subdivision Dear Councilmen: I have reviewed the application for The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 6 Subdivision and find that it includes approximately 52 homes assuming a median value of $115,000. We also find that this subdivision is located in census tract 103.10 and in the attendance zone for Linder Elementary School, Meridian Middle School and Meridian High School. Elementary students from this development will be transported to Lake Hazel Elementary, due to overcrowding at Linder Elementary. Using the above information we can predict that these homes, when completed, will house 15 elementary aged children, 12 middle school aged children, and 15 senior high aged students. At the present time Linder Elementary is at 146.40. The Meridian School District is not opposed to growth, however this subdivision will cause increased over-crowding in all three schools. There is little opportunity to shift attendance boundaries since the surrounding schools are also well over capacity. The Meridian School District will support this development but we will need land dedicated to the district or at least made available at a minimum price for a school site in this area. The site would need water and sewer services available. In addition we would need to pass another bond issue for the construction of schools. The cost per student for newly constructed schools, excluding site purchase price and offsite improvements, exceeds $5,000 per elementary student and $10,000 per middle or high school student. • We are in a difficult position and need your help in dealing with the impact of growth on schools. Sincerely, ~~~ Jim Carberry Administrator of Support Programs JC:gr ~~ ~~ Return to: ^ Boise t_ ~3.j Q `f !~`~~: ^ Eagle Rezone # '~~•~~~~' ~~~~~~#~~ ^ Garden city C ' 'onal Use # reliminary Final /Short Plat Svc jj /~//~'/v,~/ '~iJT' C, .~eridian ^ Acz ^ I. We have No Objections to this Proposal. ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. We can Approve this Proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: ^ 2 feet ^ 4 feet ^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. ~- 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: v~~central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: ~}-central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines ~ central water ~- 10. Street Runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ I I. Stormwater disposal systems shall be reviewed by relative to: ^ Wasce Disposal ^ Injection Well rules. ^ Groundwater Protection ^ 12. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ 13. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ I4. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center 15. ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store Date: ~/ /~ ~ it-i"~"~Z /Ll N frc t- / Tom")'/ ~ Reviewed By: - /~~ C CENTRAL CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT •• DISTRICT Environmental Health Division ~'RHEALTH ~~~E~. DEPARTMENT Review Sheet CDHD 10/91 rcb, rev. I/9S • • CENTRAL ~• DISTRICT ~' H EALTH 75-5211 • FAX:327-8500 DEPARTMENT MAIN OffICE • 707 N. ARMSTRONG PL. BOISE, ID. 83104 (208) 3 To prevent and treat disease and disability; to promote healthy lifestyles; and to protect and promote the health and quality of our environment. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT RECOMIV~NDATIONS We recommend that the first one half inch of stormwater be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality. The engineers and architects involved with the design of this project should obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals that could be used for guidance are: 1) GUIDELINES FOR TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF STORMWATER RUN OFF. Idaho Division of Environmental Quality, Southwest Idaho Regional Office, September 1995. 2) STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND, State of Washington Department of Ecology, February 1992. 3) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT GUIDELINES FOR. STORMWATER AND SITE DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT. Serving Valley, Elmore, Boise, and Ada Counties Ada / Boisee County Office WIC Boise • Meridian Elmae County Office Elmore County Office ~~Y County Office Box 1448 P O 107 N. Amutrong PI. 1606 Roberts 520 E. 8th Street N. of Environmental HeaBh . . 83638 ID McCall Boise, ID. 83704 Boise, ID. Mountain Home, ID. 190 S. 4th Sheet E. , . 634-7194 Ph Enviro. Heatlh: 327.7499 83705 Ph. 334-3355 83647 Ph. 587.4407 Mountain Home, ID. . Family Planning: 321-1400 324 Meridian, ID. 83647 Ph. 587-9225 Immun¢ations; 321-7450 83642 Ph. 888-6525 Nutrition: 327-1460 WIC; 321-7488 WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., Clty Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Flre Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Pl~ee to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA CITY OF MERIDIAN MAX YERRINGTON wA~ W. MORROW 33 EAST IDAHO P & Z COMMISSION MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 JIM JOHNSON, chairman Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 MOE ALIDJANI Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2 Motor Vehicle/Drivas License (208) 888-444 ~~ L~ ~ V ~ JIM SHEARER L`y^ARLIE ROUNTREE TIM HEPPER GRANT P. xiNGSFORD DEC 2 2 1995 Mayor NAMPA & MppE~~RSSIrrDIAN TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMEN'~I~~tOJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning 8~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: Januar.~ 2, 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 12/18/95 HEARING DATE: 1/9/96 REQUEST: Preliminary Plat for The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 6 Subdivision BY: Steiner Development LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Immediately east of the Lake at Cherry Lane No. 3 Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z GREG OSLUND, P2 TIM HEPPER, P/Z BOB CORRIE, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C GLENN BENTLEY, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER irrigation water be made MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDUIW POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: All laterals and waste ways must be protected. Municipal surface drainage must be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must review draina e lans. It is recommended that available to all deve opments wit in t is istrict. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District requires that a Land Use Change/Site Development application be filed for review prior to final platting. t;ontact Donna Moore at 343-1884 or 466-7861 for further information. Bill He>hs n Assistant Water Su erintendent Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District "°•~ ' ~I~'~ t~~ ~~iG~-~IU'~j`k DEC 22 '95 11~51AM IPCO BOISE OPERATIONS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., Cfry Clerk JANIGE L. OASS, Clty Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUAR7 Walar Works Supt. JOHN T, SHAWCROFT, Waste Wator Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P 8 Z AGmInlslrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Flre Chi61 W.L. 'BILL GORDON, Potica Oh1et WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR„ Atlomey • • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Livc CITY ~]F MERIDIA1o1 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO s364a Phone (208) 888~dd33 • FAX (208) 887-x813 Public Works/Building Department (209) 887-2211 Motor Vchiclc/Otivers License (209) 688.4443 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor P.1i1 COUNCIL MEMBEIiC RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT O. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW P 9 z C MMlss10N JIM JOHNSON, Chairman MOE ALIDJANI JIM SHEARER CHARLIE ROUNTREE TIM HEPPER TRANSMYTTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH TIDE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn; Will Berg, City Clerk by:~lanua 2. 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 12/18195 HEARING DATE: 1/9/96 REQUEST: Preliminary Plato The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 6 Subdivision BY: Seel a Development LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT:- Immediately s of the Lake at Cherry LaRe_No. 3_Su~diwisi_Qn JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z GREG OSLUND, P2 TIM HEPPER, P/Z BOB CORRIE, MAYOR „_,,,,RONALD TOLSMA, C/C CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C GLENN BENTLEY, C/C -WATER DEPARTMENT -SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT ~Y_ITV OT7r1I7NFV ~MERIDI, ~VIERIDIA _}1DA COi _^}1DA PLP CENTRA _NAMPA 3ETTLEI IDAHO P Post-it® Fax Note 7671 oats p~as- / To L) r t O F DER r D rAN From ~y,q Co.lDapt. pu 6 ~ W 8 S Co. I A too p0 w ER ~o - Phona# $^ 33 Phones 3ZZ- Zo~Z aX~ gs7- ~Br3 Fain 388- ~9z~4 U.S. WEI - --- ~INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) _ BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM $ FINAL PLAT) -CITY PILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ~ECEIVE~- DEC 1 ~ 1995 We require a permanent 10-foot wide public utilities ~~TY OF 1vi1~t~11U~A easement along ali lots adjacent to a road right-of-way dedicated to public or private use. Tim Adams ~~ ~~'~ Idaho Power ~ti 322-2047 DEC 22 '95 10 51 PAGE.01 ~~ ...~. • EaERLE, BERLIN, KADING, TURNBOW & MCKLVEEN , CHARTERED ATT011N[Mi ANO COUNi[LO11>• AT LAw cAl•ITOL PAgR PLAZA TEL[PMON[ 300 N011TN SIXTH STaEBT ~ ~~d~ ~~AV~ PORT OFPIC[ BOX 1308 FACa1 MIL~1C gT[!IN¢N A. B11AO~UIQr ®OIA[, IDAHO ®370) ~~) OAiO-ee6! JM~K~ L.:Yww~1w Or COIrN![L T, M. E[ML~~IOOMw79) January 9, 1996 '~ KECEIVED ,~ '~R,AI~$riITTBD VIA FA~;BIMI7.$ : ' Jni'! ~ ~ iafls .: Bruce Freckleton Ae~si®tant to City Engineer ~DigNCITY~ ; C~,~ty of Meridian 3,3'' East Idaho Avenue ,' Me'7ridian, ID 83642 Re: Redivision!of Lot 1.0, Block li, The Lake at Cherry Lane subdivision No. 5 (previously Designated as The Lake at~ Cherry Lnn® No. 6) ,;, Deer Bruce: , 1 .s This follows our meeting of January 8, 1996, in v~hich yQu, Gary, Shari, Doug, and I discussed n number of issues surrounding' the above referenced application. Please treat this letter as' Steiner Development's written response to your review comments dated January 5, 1996, pursuant to the request contained in General Comment No. 15. ,~ 1. The applicant intends to relocate and tile, in accordance with city ordinance, all ditches which cross the subject property, will obtain approval from the appropriate irrigation district, and arrange for written confirmation of the approval to be sulpmitted to thv public works department. Z. The applicant will either abandon the existing domestic: well or, if possible, make use of it in accordance with city. ordinance. 3. As we discussed, the applicant will determine the seasonal high ground water elevation and submit a profile of they subsurface soil conditions with the street development plans. 4. The applicant is working on the proposed restrictive covenants and will provide them for review by the city prior to final plat approval. T- ~. _ ~ _ TAN A4 ' QF 1 d: d7 ?t~RZddR~d7 PAf:F R7 Bruce Freckleton ;January 9, 1996 Page 2 r 5. As we have discussed, the proposed protect i® being ,processed ae a planned unit development and eontemplate~ that the street® would be private, rather ~*~~~ ,..,,,~,{.G. As a peat of that f: process, the applica~it will seek approval from the cit for f~.qe .foot sidewalks on one aide of each street within t~ project boundaries. 6. The applicant will obtain all necessary appr~ivals from 'the Ada county street Name Committee and submit that;approval~, along with any changes which may be necessary to the p*eliminnry plat just e® soon as the street mime committee has taken action. 7. The applicant will coordinate fire hydrant plaeQment with the city of Meridian's waterworks Superintendent. I B. It is the applicant's understanding that the subject parcel of property is not affected by any FEMA flood plain boundaries. Any flood plain issues which exist on othea~ portions of the property will b® handled at the time those are proposed for development. ~ 9. It is our understanding that~a street drainage plan has bean submitted to you under separate cover and you are in possession of it. ' 10-14. The applicant will comply with all provioions of city code and federal law with respect to off-street parking requirements, exterior lighting, and signage. ' B4sFonss to Bita Bnaaifio Coumaat^ ' 1. the applicant proposes to supply pressurized #rrigation water to subject property through the same system ae wi;ll supply water to The Lake at Cherry Lane Subdivision Nos. 3 and 4. The source of the water will be a shared source to be used by adjacent developers. The applicant has bean in hontact with Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District and is negotiating a contrast whereby the irrigation district will take title to the system once it h:s boon completed and thereafter own and operate it. The applicant does not have any present intention to' propose a supplementary convection from the city's water system to the pressurized irrigation system. ; 2. The applicant will work with`the Meridian Public works Department with respect to the placement of and specifications for the street lights. The applicant understands that the street lights are to be installed at its expense. JAN 09 '96 14 43 w 2083448542 PAGE.03 • . . Bruce Freckleton January 9, 1996 Page 3 3. Aa indicated above, the applicant is proposing private roads on the interior of the planned unit development. Since the pro jnct contemp).n+-~+a -.~,~q;;q for older persons, it ie unlikelg ~~^~ very many children, ii any, will be residing in the pro ect. For that reason, it is un],ikely that school. buses will be r quired to travel the interior roadways. The. applicant has had d scussions with the Meridian Fize Chief and has been advised that' there ie sufficient right of way to safely operate emergency vehic~.es on the int®rnal roadways. In the event the fire department determines that no parking should be permitted on the interior streets, the applicant understands that it will be 'required to poet no parking signs, at its expense, and provide for the enforcement of the no parking requirements b~ the Homeowners Association which will be formed in accordance with the proposed restrictive covenants. 4. The applicant understands that approval of the project is contingent upon the capacity of the city of Meridians Wastewater Treatment Plant. 5. We recognize and understand the concerns you have expressed with respect to the status of the previously submitted preliminary plat. During our meetin,q of January 8, 1996, we discussed a number of those issues and have, we understand, resolved many of your concerns. The applicant has agreed to submit a final version of the preliminary plat showing the proper phase and zoning boundary lines. We have also agreed that~we would provide you with written responses to your comments of March 10, 1995. I trust that I have adequately responded to your comments. In the event you have questions, concerns, or are in need of additioaal information, .please feel free to contact me. SAB:jkr cc; Doug Campbell sandy Clay JAN 09 '96 14=44 very truly youre~ ' TEPHE A. BRADBURY 2083448542 PAGE. 04 S~IVISION EVALUATION EET ~EcE'v~0 FE B 0 5 1996 Proposed Development Name _THE LoKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. 6 City MERII~A~Il~#:n"~~ Date Reviewed 12/28/95 Preliminary Stage XXXXX Final Engineer/Developer .Pacific Land Surveyors / Steiner Development The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Boise City Street Name Ordinance. "N. TEN MILE ROAD" STR~? "W. TEETER DAtVE'r' The fol lowing new stre et names are approved and shall ~oear on the plat as• _ "WEST MONTROSE DRIVE" "WEST MONESSEN STREET" "WEST MORTENSON STREET" _- "NORTH ALTO AVENUE" "NAZA RETH" is a dupl ication and therefore cannnt hP ucerl_ "_SAXTON" is a duplication and they _fnre cannnt hp ~~cpri_ ~~ ~Q~_1 /~ L1 D ~~ f'~n.~- ~ 1,~SeG1. ~'~tflasc, C~~~,/ lltir-u~ . The above street name comments have been read and approved.. by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE, ArG~E,~IC„Y RENTATIVES OR DESIGNEES Ada County Engineer John Priester Ada Planning Assoc. Terri Raynor City of Meridian Meridian Fire Dept. Representative ~~~~ Date ~Z Z~ ~S~ Date `~ ~~ Date / 9>~ .1-'~~ Date ~2 " 2g ` 4~ NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed !!!! Sub Index Street Index 3N 1 E 32 Section NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS o{ C~~~:/rB~~"" ~~~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 13, 1996 Page 9 Johnson: Well, the findings of fact have resolved that, the fact that we have a conflict should be addressed in the motion. Olsund: I make a motion that the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopt and approves these findings of fact and conclusions but in addition to, hopefully I am doing this right, give me a hand here if I am not. Let me start over again.. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these findings of fact and conclusions with the following added conditions. One, that the roads shall be private and to the width shown on the applicant's plans. And two that the right of way width at the entry be reduced from 80 feet to 70 feet. Shearer: Second Johnson: We have a motion and a second, this is a roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Hepper -Yea, Shearer -Yea, Oslund -Yea, MacCoy -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Johnson: Recommendation to the City Council? Oslund: The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends that this application be approved under the conditions stated above in these findings of fact and conclusions of law. That any ultimate approval should be subject to all City ordinances specifically including design review and plat approval under the procedures of the subdivision and development ordinance. Shearer: Second Johnson: It has been moved and seconded to pass the recommendation onto the. City Council. as stated by Commissioner Oslund, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #9: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO.S SUBDIVISION BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT; TABLED JANUARY 9, 1996: Johnson: Any comments regarding the preliminary plat? Oslund: I move that we recommend to the City Council that the preliminary plat be approved per the conditions set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law for the -, ~ . Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 13, 1996 Page 10 conditional use. Shearer: Second Johnson: It is moved and seconded.we pass a recommendation to the City Council of the City of Meridian as stated by Commissioner Oslund, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #10: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR REZONE OF 8.34 ACRES TO C-N BY SMITH'S FOOD AND DRUG CENTER, INC.: Johnson: Any comments regarding the findings of fact for Smith's Food and Drug Center, Inc? Oslund: Point of interest, page 17, item 7, recommended that the vacant parcel to the west be developed as a park with maintenance provided by homeowners association of Valerie Place Subdivision. I guess I wonder do we have the authority to place it in their, within their responsibility to maintain? Do they have anything to say about this? Johnson: Does anyone have a valid recommendation here? Mr. Crookston, are we making a valid recommendation here? Crookston: It is something that would have to be worked out between Smith's and the homeowners association of Valerie Place. It is a recommendation to the Council hopefully they would come to the City and talk about it. We cannot require that. Oslund: If we can't come to an agreement and that deal falls through what happens with our, it just evaporates altogether or what? Crookston: Well it would. It is my understanding that the City does not want to have an approximately 2 acre park to maintain and care for. That is why that is in there the way it is. Their proposal was to either have it as a .park or to make it part of a residential subdivision is what they said at the hearing. Johnson: Understand? Oslund: It is clear as mud I guess. Johnson: Well the park was one of two alternatives proposed as I recall. Any other comments regarding these findings of fact that have been prepared for Smith's Food and • MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: JANUARY 9.1996 APPLICANT: STEINER DEVELOPMENT AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 11 REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING• REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO 6 SUBDIVISION AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS "REVIEWED" ~/ ~3 SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS A /~ ~~ ' ~ SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ~~ SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS III Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.