Loading...
Interstate Center FPWILLIAM G. BERG, JR., Clty Clerk JANICE L. GASS, Clty Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., Clty Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administratpr PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney .J ~U 1 ' B OF TR~.SZ/~ ~ E]j.LEj GOUNGIL ti!E6!BERg A Good Place t0 Live WALT W. MORROW, President CITY OF MERIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA EE ~ L G ENN R. BENTLEY 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 P & Z COMMISSION Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 TIM HEPPER Motor VShicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND ROBERT D. CORRIE MALCOLM MACCOY Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 8, 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/26/96 HEARING DATE: 10/15 /96 REQUEST: Final Plat for Interstat Center BY: W.H. Moore Comuanv LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Overland Road. S uth of I-84 Interchange JIM JOHNSON, P2 MALCOLM MACCOY, P2 JIM SHEARER, P2 GREG OSLUND, P2 KEITH BORUP, P2 ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C GLENN BENTLEY, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPAR ~ MENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: REQUES~FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL IMINARY LA N / AL PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSION: A request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerks possession no later than three days following the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month the request was made. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:00 P.M., Thursday following the Planning and Zoning Commission action. GENERAL INFORMATION Name of Annexation and Subdivision, Interstate Center 2. General Location, SE 1/4 Section 13. T.3N.. R 1W. 3. Owners of record, Winston H. Moore Address, 600 N. Steelhead Way. Ste 144. Boise. ID. ,Zip 83704 Telephone (2081 32 -1 1 4. Applicant, W.H. Moore Com a~nx Address, 600 N. Steelhead, Ste. 144. Boise. Id 83704 5. Engineer, Stan McHutchison Firm Briggs Engineering. Inc. Address, 1111 S. Orchard. Ste. 600. Boise. Id Zip 83705 Telephone 344-9'T00 6. Name and address to receive City billings: Name W.H. Moore Com a~nx Address 600 N.Steelhead. Ste. 144. Boise. Id 83704 Telephone 323_1919 PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features Acres 39.06 2. Number of lots 23 buildable and 4 common lots 950615~applicat (1) 3. Lots per acres 4. Density per acre I~/A 5. Zoning Classification(s) ~ C 6. If the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridian City Limits but within the jurisdictional mile, what is the existing zoning classification 20.67 AC Annex/Rezone requested 3/14/95 7. 8. 9. 10 Does the plat border a potential green belt Possibly (Ten Mile Creekl Have recreational easements been provided for Existing sewer easement along T n i Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City ~ Explain Are there proposed dedications of common areas? ILQ Explain For future parks? Explain 11. What school(s) service the area Meridian School District, do you propose any agreements for future school sites Vim, Explain 12. 13. 14. 15. Other proposed amenities to the City Central Water Supply Fire Hydrants Fire Department Central Sewer, Other , Explain Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial or combination) Commercial Type of Dwelling(s) Single Family,Duplexes, Multiplexes, other N/A Proposed Development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot(s), 39.200 b. Minimum square footage of structure(s), I~/A c. Are garages provided for, Imo/ square footage d. Are other coverings provided for ~/q e. Landscaping has been provided for ,Describe Landscape Plan was submitted during preliminary slat process. 950615~applicat (2) Trees will be p~ided for at the time of developm~t of the first lot on Overland Road ,trees will be maintained by the Lot Owner's Association. g. Sprinkler systems are provided for in common lots. h. Are there multiple units N/ Type Remarks Are there special set back requirements yg~ Explain 35 feet adjacent to Overland & 20 feet next to I-84 Has off street parking been provided for y~ Explain The develo ment will accommodate on site parking k. Value range of property I~/A Type of financing for development ~/ m. Protective covenants were submitted yam, Date Apri129. 1996 16. Does the proposal land lock other property~lo, Does it create Enclaves 1~. STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be constructed to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. 2. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 3. Development will connect to City services. 4. Development will comply with City Ordinances. 5. Preliminary Plat will include all appropriate easements. 6. Street names must not conflict with City grid system. 950615~applicat (3) • STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE INTERSTATE CENTER 1. The .proposed internal transportation facility will be a private drive. The construction will be consistent with commercial developments where internal access is provided to parking facilities adjoining the businesses. Pedestrian facilities will be provided with 5' sidewalks. The internal street will be constructed with a 41 foot (back of curb to back of curb) street section. Ada County Highway District requires a 5 foot sidewalk along Overland Road. The applicant will provide a bond for this improvement and construct the facilities when the development is built. 2. The westerly portion of the parcel is designated mixed planned use development. A request for annexation and rezone was submitted and approved for C-G with a development agreement. The easterly portion of the parcel is zoned C-G. The subdivision application for the purpose of a commercial development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and existing zoning designation of C-G. The applicant is aware of the annexation requirement on the westerly portion which requires a planned development or Conditional Use application for all uses. 3. The property abuts the Ten Mile Creek sewer interceptor. Therefore, sewer service is available to the property. A 10-inch water main is currently located in Overland Road and will require an extension of a 12 inch water line to the parcel's west boundary. 4. The proposed lots meet all standards set forth in the Meridian Zoning Ordinance. 5. All existing and proposed easements are shown on the final plat. 6. No new public streets are proposed. 7. The applicant is requesting anon-development agreement with City of Meridian. This will allow recordation of the final plat with restrictions on construction until plans are submitted and approved. ACHD has requested conceptual plans for the sidewalk improvements and the relocation of the Kennedy Lateral. These drawings are attached. 950615~statment.com a ° ~ O • (L)mLtiiil 'ON L'13'Otld ON 7V70m! ~ _. ~ O A lV t~ 8 e 3 ~ ° ,o `88 >_-° _ c ' _ g . s B~g~ °oL\ ~~' ' ,: _`°. " ° s :~g €w _ . _ ~.. 01~OS9L 3 1L_Z0.10 N _ _ -..-.. NVIGIa3W-VN11>1) ..- . !7) `NC1 _ ..-K6"NI171 "K1 ~~ '[9Y ti ~• 0 ~~ ~O~ON °H; $~o~~° "\~ EO ~tw ~a"° § : Efi :'~ s`~-fi ° s8~ v'~Y ~ 8;0€ ~~ ( g ~- 3~ 89 'ON AVMHOIH 31`I1S ~ Mf:t SIN p! ~ ~ tlco Wd ~ ~nee Q.'° w EyfiO so~~ S°~. ~ d~ 03~ _ $ e i'' ~ •i } ~ I~ o fi<.:p'c ~i E~ ~a't as ~~ °oo o cs~ .,c°°€ §~° Z.cE `°°~° u~oo o5°° °~n.~° ~°3og$ ~~~ • y ~ oD S ~ I .7 ~~., Oi Y,Y Z x ~3/~O~ ~ RvV W~ ~a '7 ~ ~ ~ ~ Ea r rs° S _ . ~~a~EcQ ~'-S a~P ° oEoc ~~o~~:Q c°{ ~ N K• ~~ ~i ~I O¢~,~+bt O s7 ry m l . M p]i . ~ ~ i5og"'+ o-o ~°,asfi~.~~~~i6 ss'a S "$ °^ a ar ~Sg,~;~ . Y Z p Z 5~ i +I G ^ ^ ~. O ~ vr3 CG 77 V nr .Yu' ..°rc U° C ~>~ Y Y~ ° ~° - ` P £ S ~~ e$ Pb° C b °C °~S ~ O o S C Fb ~ /i °~ y ~ ~' O ZO Z F1 y ~~ ~ ~ I f ~~ } W E' • $ °~'- ~ O Z ~ f/1 I s°~'°o.sV~wB ~~fi~;b"=~<"z` a~~': 6s':a~ <S y , !i. fi~°v o'o .~- fi=°'c pOe P'~~..:. \.y c- oe 5 Lco ar .~ 8 ov- 5 ...fig 52w_ a ?.$.- ~°,~~- N , Km ~ S~ p~y °..E~$°.£'~ $•-5- ° .T e' ro NapeoL Z ~ i. I g o :~~~as" ~» J Y fi.° -'~"°" ~=:3-~~, °°~Jg+s`~ ;.>"°'b y8~8``. N 1 Rio S~'3 ~~€s~ aa8" 6h: ~~_ ~s b +o _ .16'0/9 M,LZ,ZO.IOS _ I $g~ ,t6'Olt I ~ $ o t ° 8 °°~~ E6.o.. ~ °}'.~ . ~$ o,yi ~yoY ~ , .N)'9fl .10'OYl .g~~~~~.~:fi~or+~ "fi~~E5Eo3ifi..~o'~~~Q.~r~^y~.6 0 , zoo y~.4°w •$",, .. g,f ~~EB Sv~~Zi ~~ Y~ £R~ a 8~ a ad~.suc~:,Y.~s'E_<°. a$8~3~S~saE~'kss~9e9E~~ ~~ ~ y h~ ~'•~I ~ m 2 ~ ,•',~ C I y ~ ~ bM !%~ ~ 917 AO'SOl R ,00'0-t t g °qqt %' i / / G~ ~ ,00'9fZ q 3 1tSL00 N ~~ ~~ 3 ~ ~ ,,~ / /~ ,fir ~V OP,O ~ i WR q~ m Q i I rc o N$ / ~ Q~/ 1 2g ~•~ ~ y / / Q / sa W Z. ^~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g 3 lttloo N 3 1t,t100 N n 1 r~= m r ~ O ~ Z o. ~ ~ ~ .ZO"lLZ .OOY9L I ~ ~C~ `/ ~ ~ ~ ~ A~~ b/, / Y~S~ Ci f ; o ~ I~ Oy~ O ~ V ~ ~ ~ V\ ~ / m p t~`I 1~ ~ O ~ ~~ ~~C -- ~ p y( °< ~ 8 ~ y / .ao•act 3 1£.£L00 N ~ G ~ N ~x o ~ I ~ #~ J Qi j~< r ~, ~b~~~ /4 I e i z Ls 8 iO ~ ~ ~ ~~~ 0. o "' ,S' e I v y~ N~~ 2 $ i // 3 1f,CL00 N 3 1tfL00 N ~~ '^ m `~ CH W K a W ~ iDi~ °i / / .00'092 .00'99L 1 ~ a 1 I I ~~,~ 3 1t.CL00 N 3 1t,tW0 N 3 1f,tL00 N 13 ~ '~ ' / 1 z+•LSr .ao•oez .ao's9L ~ ~ ----------------- 3 J~q $ ;) 8 $ I~ $ Sy'' n IIc_Si i~ 3 yZ ~ 'C I I _ O! I I ~I NI>~ m ~~ I N 3 1£.£1L10 N 3 lt,t 100 N ~~ ~ m ; ~~ I g I ,oo•a9z ,OOY,9L ' (~ u 1 WssasssssWS3sWWss ~~ ~ I W 1 I° I ~; ~ _ a«a~aaxk«:'~'~R„~'na?"-: _• - Yg ~~ R x I ,9SZLf 3 1£.£L00 N I Z 8 I n 8 N ~ '' 1 ~'Z^S:3S°.lY~S4F.31~'1-R7t y 6 ~ ~ ---a s I ~ -~ ~ ~~i:ios°i~ei.'sn§isa: p ~ ~~:=..r»...,. c'3 ~ fi ~ '~' % .r .* 1 i ~.' 88o'.EASS:8°S°$R8E^., S E yI ~~ 3 1L,tL00 N 3 1t,tL00 N ~ 1 Y; ;,~R~°OjRnX~i ~OnRRR~ B_ S G ~ o ~ I .ooro9L ,00'S9Z ~ ~' i $@ ~I n 2 i ~ ~ w I i~ b 1 ~ N g N .~ I .~rd`3 ~ 7 Sl I I 3 R I e~N~:ls.8t8ei^•i"R a M~~ n n I .~ ~ I 1 I A~~~.~LR~.R~n^q_71_~~~~^R. ~' ~ ssssasssassassaese 0 0 • ~ a m I (avow ~vniad> .ooro9z ~ ,00'S9L 3 .L£SLOO N ~ 9~$RR~~~~~~~R$RRRR~~ ,00'09! ,00'09! >; ,00'98! ~ 1 I ^$$$nn7t'«e$$$$$~$i^ _ ~7Sj 1 R1 ~~ '--'_'_' fiEEEEgg Efi p W xx~ ~ ~E 3 ~ 3 ~~ i W%~ ~ 3 ~.~ ~~ ~~ n off ~W~I~ 1~ W ,Y I~ aD N (rY~ gg $rJ JIb9»~ qI ~ z z ~> i I ~ _ m ,{y1 33~ fi~fi ~4TjN ~~ I ZW I R N 3N1- Y66W ~ I l~} i I \~ I ~ ~ I I ~ ALZLZ ' i 1 ~ I ,l9'lL .C9'0C Lti'ril tt'f6l ,S9'W A/'96 'Y ,ZO'S9l _ ~ I ~ i I ,02262 3 .Lt,1C.00 N , _ , 14'922 3 "6S,9f.00 N ,ZC'6ZL M "LC,£1.00 N ,56'01£ 3 "t1,C0~t0 f ' I E.6/ tZ M .OS,6LN) l ,LB I I ~ i 3 .11,1000 431LVldNf1 I N FED z ~ t~:_~ r ~ z 84 << ^~~ SiTF ^ ~ OVERLAND RO.eO ..~r.~+* 1 i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -- s~ e.4. j "- ~~, ~ ~~ ~3 ~ r~ ~ ~~ ~s i 1" W ~ a a i I ._ o ---- . _. 1~1 ~ [3. _ ~4~ ~, ~~ ~ ~ ~.I 1; ;; t iJ -, -f +~ C~ r,,r ` ~7 r!; r' '1 ~J I vii, ~ p~iee-~i~~r ~ -f Gam' ._- - -_ - -- - -- - -~ -- -- -- - DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ~~=- , ; _ THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this ~ ~ day of ~Q ~ , 1997, by and between the CITY OF MERIDIAN, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, party of the first part, hereinafter called the "CITY", and Winston H. Moore and Diane L. Moore, husband and wife, parties of the second part, hereinafter called the "DEVELOPER", whose address is P. O. Box 8204, Boise, Idaho 83707-2204. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, DEVELOPER is the sole owner, in law and/or equity, of a certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in Exhibit "A" (Property), which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full; and WHEREAS, DEVELOPER is defined as Winston H. Moore and Diane L. Moore and/or their successors, heirs, assigns. WHEREAS, the State of Idaho legislature, in 1991, passed Idaho Code, 67-6511A, Development Agreements, which provides that cities may enter into development agreements with developers upon rezoning and annexation of land; and . WHEREAS, the CITY has passed two development agreement ordinances, one when land is rezoned, 11-2-416 L, and one when land is annexed, when it.is also rezoned, 11-2-417 D; and WHEREAS, the DEVELOPER submitted and the CITY has approved an annexation and rezone to General Commercial (C-G) of the Property, and.has submitted a subdivision final plat for said Property; and WHEREAS, the DEVELOPER has made representations at the public hearings before the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission and the Meridian. City Council as to how the Property would be developed and what improvements would be made; and WHEREAS, the CITY has authority to place conditions and restrictions upon annexation or rezoning of property; and WHEREAS, the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law required that the DEVELOPER enter into a Development Agreement; and 2/18/97 INTERSTATE CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Page 1 • WHEREAS, the CITY, in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, annexed the Property subject to de-annexation if the DEVELOPER did not enter into a Development Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: DEVELOPER agrees, and hereby binds his, its or their heirs, successors and assigns to this agreement, as a condition of the annexation of the area, as follows: 1. That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full, and the terms of this agreement cannot be altered, changed or modified without the express written consent of the CITY. 2. 3 That DEVELOPER, in accordance with its representations before the CITY, shall, on the land described in Exhibit "A": a. Submit to the CITY an application for conditional use, and obtain the CITY's approval thereof, prior to, and as a condition of, the commencement of construction of any building(s) or improvements by DEVELOPER or use by DEVELOPER of any lot on the Property. b. Submit a final subdivision plat application of the Property to the CITY to be approved by the CITY and recorded in the Ada County Recorder's office prior to any development, except for the proposed Lot 5 of Block 1 of the plat for Interstate Center as discussed in Item 3. Select Development has submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit to develop a family entertainment center on Lot 5 of Block 1. The CITY has agreed that recordation of the final plat will not be a condition to approving the conditional use permit for the developmen Conditions of approval for the conditional use permit are further described in Exhibit "B", which is attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, and outlined in the Findings of Fact n fusions of Law for that particular Conditional Use Permit. and Co c 4. That DEVELOPER will file with the City Engineer, a complete set o Improvement Plans ("Improvement Plans") showing all internal streets, all utilities and required transitional paving in Overland Road, entry drives entering the property from a public or private right-of-way, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, pressurized irrigation facilities, pumping stations, piping of irrigation ditches, fire hydrants, sewe3 and water lines and appurtenances (including. extensions along the exterior boundary of Property), electrical, gas and telephone lines, landscaping, The Select Development project, but no occupancy permit shall be issued for that project until final plat has been recorded. 2/18/97 INTERSTATE CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Page 2 drainage, street and other signage, barricades, and other such improvements contemplated within the development, which Improvement Plans, and all improvements shown thereon, shall meet the approval of the City Engineer. Said Improvement Plans shall be and are incorporated herein and made a part hereof by reference, and are referred to herein as the Subdivision Improvements. It is agreed that the improvements to be constructed and installed by successor owners which are located wholly within the boundaries of the lots (hereafter "On- Site Improvements") shall be subject to approval by the CITY in the normal course of the CITY's issuance of a conditional use permit and building permit for the construction of a building on such separate lot, with the CITY's remedy for the failure to construct or install such On-Site Improvements being as provided in the Ordinances of the CITY or the denial of a Certificate of Occupancy with respect to the building constructed on said lot. The failure of the owner of a lot within the property to construct or install the On-Site Improvements on said lot shall not affect or interfere with the issuance of a building permit or a Certificate of Occupancy with respect to any other lot within the property, provided the owner thereof is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the approvals granted for that lot by the CITY and/or the plans approved by the CITY for the building constructed thereon. 5. That DEVELOPER will, at his or their own expense, construct and install all Subdivision Improvements, as well as any and all other improvements as reviewed and approved by the CITY. CITY has approved construction of the Subdivision Improvements in phases, the first of which are those improvements necessary to serve Lots 1-5, 22 and 23, Block 1. DEVELOPER agrees that no Certificates of Occupancy will be issued for any building or use on a lot in a phase until all Subdivision Improvements have been installed, completed and accepted by the CITY for that phase. 6. That DEVELOPER will construct and install all Subdivision Improvements in strict accordance with a filed and approved plat and Improvement Plans, and the City Standard Engineering Drawings and Standard Engineering Specifications current and in effect at the time the construction of said improvements is accomplished. 7. That DEVELOPER will provide the City Engineer with at least fifteen (15) days advance written notification of when and what improvements he intends to complete and the time schedule therefor; and agrees to make such modifications and/or construct any temporary facilities necessitated by such phased construction work as shall be required and approved by the City Engineer. 2/ 18/97 INTERSTATE CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Page 3 r ~ 8. That DEVELOPER will have "corrected" original drawings of the Improvement Plans prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer and will provide the CITY with said Plans or a duplicate mylar copy of said Plans. The Improvement. Plans of the proposed improvements shall be "corrected" to show the actual constructed location (both horizontally and vertically) of the various streets, water and sewer lines, all utility lines, piped irrigation ditches, and pressurized imgation lines and their individual building service lines, sidewalk, curb and gutter alignment and grades, etc. The "corrected" Improvement Plans shall include a "Certification" thereon, signed by the Registered Professional Engineer in charge of the work, that said Plans of the various improvements are true and correct. 9. That DEVELOPER shall, immediately upon the completion of phase(s) of said development, notify the City Engineer and request his inspection and written acceptance of such completed improvements or portion thereof. 10. That DEVELOPER agrees, upon a Finding by the City Council, duly entered in the official minutes of the proceedings of the City Council, that a portion, or portions, or the entirety of said improvements need to be completed in the interest of the health, welfare and/or safety of the inhabitants of the CITY, the DEVELOPER will, within a reasonable tune as determined by the CITY, construct said needed improvements, or, if he does not so construct within a reasonable time after written notification of such Council action, and the CITY thereafter determines to constzuct, and does construct such improvement, the DEVELOPER will pay to the CITY the actual costs paid or incurred by the CITY for such improvements so constructed by the CITY, plus interest thereon at an annual interest rate equal to the prime interest rate of First Security Bank of Idaho plug five percent (5.0%) until paid, said payment to be made in such manner and under such terms as the CITY shall order after conference with the DEVELOPER. Provided, however, the City Council shall not make the Finding set forth in this paragraph except at a regular or special meeting of the City Council, duly held, and unless the DEVELOPER has been notified in writing of the time and place of such meeting at least three (3) days prior thereto and has been given an opportunity to be present in person or by counsel, and to be heard on the merit of the proposed Finding. 11. That DEVELOPER agrees that upon its having received written notification from the City Engineer, that any of the requirements herein specified have not been complied with within any phase of the Subdivision Improvements, that the CITY shall have the right to withhold the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy within that phase and/or shall have the right to withhold the providing of culinary water service to any parcel within such phase until such time as all requirements 2/18/97 INTERSTATE CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Page 4 • specified herein have been complied with; provided, however, the DEVELOPER shall have the right to appear before the City Council at any regular meeting after any Certificate of Occupancy or any water service shall have been withheld for reasons set forth in this paragraph, and shall have the right to be heard as to why such Certificate of Occupancy should be issued or water service allowed. The Council shall then decide whether said Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued or water service to said parcel allowed, and its decision shall be final, except that the rights of the parties are preserved at law and equity, including, but not limited to, the right of appeal to a court of competent jurisdiction. 12. That DEVELOPER agrees that as security for the construction by the DEVELOPER of the Subdivision Improvements, the CITY shall require from the DEVELOPER irrevocable letter(s) of credit, cash deposit(s), certified check(s), or negotiable bond(s) as allowed under Section 11-9-606 C of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian, and the CITY shall have the right to withhold a building permit with respect to any lot within the Property until the same is provided by the DEVELOPER. Said improvements shall include, but not be limited to, sewer, water, curb, gutter and sidewalks, irrigation and drainage piping, pressurized imgation system, landscaping and berming, and fencing. 13. That DEVELOPER agrees, in recognition of the unique and peculiar circumstances relative to this development, to the special conditions set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof; and agrees to construct a perimeter fence around building construction areas to contain debris prior to any construction, except where roadways and streets for access are located and except where the CITY has agreed in writing that such fencing is not necessary. 14. That DEVELOPER agrees that those portions of the water main or sanitary sewer lines, as identified in the Improvement. Plans, requiring increased line size or capacity because of future service needs originating from properties not owned by DEVELOPER and located within the vicinity of the subject development, will be constructed by the DEVELOPER. In recognition of the cost savings which can be accomplished by construction of such excess capacity and/or improvements concurrently with the facilities to be constructed for DEVELOPER's purposes, and the impracticality or impossibility of constructing such excess capacity and/or improvements separately or at a later time, DEVELOPER agrees to design and construct such facilities subject to the CITY's entering into a late comers agreement to reimburse DEVELOPER for any such excess capacity. DEVELOPER agrees to obtain three independent bona fide bids for the performance of such work from qualified and responsible contractors and shall deliver copies of such bids to the CITY prior to the commencement of such work. Such bids shall be solicited and 2/ 18/97 INTERSTATE CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Page 5 • itemized in a manner which allows clear and specific identification of that portion of the construction work representing excess capacity. The CITY's obligation to enter into a late comers agreement to help DEVELOPER to pay for such costs shall be limited to the lowest of such bids irrespective of whether the lowest bidder is in fact selected by DEVELOPER to perform the work. 15. That DEVELOPER agrees that any notice required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or deposited in the United States mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY of Meridian: City Engineer City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 with copy to: Wayne G. Crookston, Jr. Ambrose, Fitzgerald & Crookston P. O. Box 427 Meridian, ID 83680 DEVELOPER: Winston H. and Diane L. Moore P. O. Box 8204 Boise, Idaho 83707-2204 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof. The parties may at any time hereafter modify or amend this Agreement by a subsequent written agreement executed by the parties. This Agreement shall not, however, be changed orally, nor shall it be deemed modified in any way by the act of any of the parties hereto. Nothing herein is intended, nor shall it be construed, as obligating a party to agree to any modification to this Agreement. 16. That DEVELOPER agrees to pay all recording fees necessary to record this Agreement with the Ada County Recorder's office. 17. All covenants and conditions set forth herein shall be appurtenant to and run with the land and shall be binding upon DEVELOPER's heirs, successors or assigns. 18. This Agreement shall become valid and binding only upon its approval by the City Council and execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. 2/18/97 INTERSTATE CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Page 6 19. That DEVELOPER agrees to abide by all ordinances of the CITY of Meridian and the Property shall be subject to de-annexation if the owner or his assigns, heirs, or successors shall not meet the conditions contained in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, this Development Agreement, and the Ordinances of the CITY of Meridian, and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian which was approved and adopted on January 4, 1994. DATED the date, month and year first appearing. DEVELOPER: By Winston H. Moore By a~ Diane L. Moore CITY OF MERIDIAN: By ~../ obert D. Corrie, Mayor By William G. Berg, City Cler ,~{ OF ~~ ~ ~. ~~i .: 817i~L r 7 ~(JN'TY ~. 2/18/1997 INTERSTATE CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Page 7 STATE OF IDAHO ) County of Ada) ss. On this 3 ~j day of ~~L~ , 1997, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeare inston H. Moore and Diane L. Moore, husband and wife, known, or proved to me, to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument ,and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in t}~ i~aefirst above written. ~~ ,_, * ; '~ ®~ ,~ „ Notary Public for Idaho v b f°U B LAG e' ;` Residing at: ~~~/f-~ ~~~'I~1 (SEAL) ~'• `~T 'aa y9~ O °°` My Commission Expires: /~ /.~ - ~ F~- ~? ~~ ,~i '7 a9ese 4o9~ `i a+e ~°°..~ O F 1~9 e' ee°e ~e~te~a~~es~ STATE OF IDAHO ) County of Ada) ss. On this ~7 day of 1997, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appe ed Robert D. Come and William G. Berg, Jr., known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian that executed this instrument and the persons who executed the said instrument on behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that said City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL) ~ ~° ss = ~o .~OZ A R Y VB~ .. ~3"y ,~~.,,.~4 .~ .~ ~jJ/1111/11111\ 9~,....; ~~- Not P lic for Idaho Res din at: Y~P~ 1'Ir ~'• •-. My mmission Expires: ~,~~ 2/18/1997 INTERSTATE CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Page 8 DESCRIPTION OF INTERSTATE CENTER October 11, 1996 A portion of the SE 1/4 of Section 13, Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a found brass cap at the southeast corner of Section 13. T.3N., R.1 W.. B.M., thence N 89°46'23" W 412.04 feet along the south line of said Section 13 to the southwest corner of Mr. Sandman Subdivision No. 2; thence N 01°02'27" E 45.00 feet to the southwest comer of Lot 6. Block 1, Mr. Sandman Subdivision No. 2, the Initial Point of this subdivision; Thence S 01°02'27" W 45.00 feet to a point on said section tine; Thence N 89°46'23" W 1696.99 feet along said section line to a point; Thence N 00°31'11" E 19.24 feet to a point; Thence N 01°03'11" E 340.95 feet to a point; Thence N 00°13'37" W 229.32 feet to a point; Thence N 00°38'59" E 228.87 feet to a point; Thence N 01°19'50" W 21.81 feet to a point; Thence N 00°31'11" E 292.20 feet to a point on the southerly right-of--way of Interstate 84; Thence S 89°33'35" E 385.48 feet along said right-of-way to a point; Thence S 85°44"44" E 459.84 feet along said right of way to a point; Thence S 46°46'12" E 34.20 feet to a point; Thence S 67°45'31" E 350.76 feet to a point; Thence S 60°10'33" E 194.73 feet to a point; Thence N 45°33'43" E 17.75 feet to a point on the southerly right of way of Interstate 84; Thence S 46°28'17" E 134.62 feet along said right of way to a point of curvature; 95061511egal. des EXHIBIT A • Thence along said right-of--way to a curve to the left 256.12 feet, said curve having a radius of 431.97 feet, a central angle of 33°58'15", tangents of 131.95 feet and a chord of 252.38 feet which bears S 63°27'24" E to the northwest corner of Mr. Sandman Subdivision; Thence S 01°02'27" W 610.94 feet to the Initial Point of this subdivision. Said parcel contains 39.08 acres, more or less, _ Michael E. Marks, No. 4998 g50615uegal.des ~ i EXHIBIT "B" TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO AND WINSTON H. AND DIANE L. MOORE DEVELOPER shall develop the property described in Exhibit "A" (Property) as a Planned Commercial Development pursuant to §11-9-607 of the Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. 2. DEVELOPER acknowledges and agrees that it will be required to submit to the CITY an application for Conditional Use Permit pursuant to § 11-2-418 of the Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, and obtain the CITY's approval thereof, prior to, and as a condition of, the commencement of construction of any buildings or improvements on the Property allowed within the C-G Zone, it being acknowledged that DEVELOPER has submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit for the Family Entertainment Center, which application has been approved in accordance with the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and subject to the execution of this Development Agreement. 3. DEVELOPER agrees to comply with the requirements of the Meridian Police Department, Meridian Fire Department, Meridian City Engineer, Meridian Planning Director, Ada County Highway District (hereafter "ACRD"), Central District Health Department and the Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District. 4. DEVELOPER covenants and agrees that, in connection with the development of the Property as may be approved by the CITY, DEVELOPER shall, at its cost and expense, do and perform the following: a. Landscaping -Overland Road. Construct a landscape strip within the Property along the full length of the Property adjacent to the north right-of-way line of Overland Road ("Overland Road Landscaping"), except for driveway accesses. The Overland Road Landscaping shall be a minimum of thirty-five feet (35') in width beyond required ACRD right-of--way, including any necessary bike lanes. The Overland Road Landscaping will be landscaped and sprinkler irrigated, by means of pressurized irrigation, in accordance with landscape plans to be submitted by DEVELOPER and approved by the CITY and Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District. EXHIBIT "B" 2/18/97 INTERSTATE CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Page 1 of 4 • b. Landsca ing -Interstate 84. Construct landscaping within the Property (Lot 6) adjacent to the south right-of-way line of Interstate 84 (I-84 Landscaping). The I- 84 Landscaping shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') in width beyond the required TTD right-of-way. The I-84 Landscaping will be landscaped and pressure- sprinkler-imgated in accordance with the landscape plan to be submitted by DEVELOPER and approved by the City and shall be constructed and installed prior to the opening for business of any uses on the Property. c. ~irb, Gutter and Sidew lk -Overland Road. Prior to obtaining a building permit for the initial building on the Property, deposit funds with or provide a letter of credit to the Ada County Highway District for construction of a five-foot (S') concrete sidewalk and match paving in the public right-of--way of Overland Road along the full length of the Property adjacent to the south boundary of the Property ("Overland Road CG&S"). The Overland Road Sidewalk shall be constructed in accordance with the standards and specifications of the ACHD in effect at the time of construction. d. Curb, C~~tter an_d Sidewalk -Private Roadway. At the time of the construction of the initial building constructed on the Property, construct curb, gutter, five-foot (5') wide concrete sidewalk and match paving along both sides of the private road easement within the phase being constructed. The Private Roadway CG&S shall be constructed in accordance with the standards and specifications of ACRD in effect at the time of constriction, or as otherwise approved by the Meridian Public Works Department for a private roadway. e. D~dicadon/Sale of Additional Righ -of-w ,y -Overland Road. Dedicate or sell land adjacent to the existing north right-of--way line of Overland Road required to meet ACHD's requirement for aforty-five-foot (45') right-of--way from the centerline of Overland Road, including any necessary bike lanes. f. Desig,~Asl'gnement of Entrances. Design/align the entrances from Overland Road to minimize to the extent possible the impacts of automobiles entering and exiting the Property, per the approval of ACHD. g. Loo Road. Construct the loop road through the Property as shown on the final plat at the time of development of the Property. The loop road shall be in the location and of the dimensions shown on the approved plat, and that portion of the loop road within the phase of the subdivision being constructed shall be paved prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. EXHIBIT "B" 2/18/97 INTERSTATE CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Page 2 of 4 • h. Subdivision Plat(s). DEVELOPER shall timely prepare, submit, and obtain the required approval by the CITY of a subdivision plat for the Property, said plat to be in conformity with the requirements of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and State Code. i. Traffic Studv(s). Provide to the CITY and ACHD a traffic impact study prepared by a recognized traffic engineer at the time the Conditional Use Permit is filed by DEVELOPER, if such is required by ACRD or CITY for the development anticipated. j. Goml?liance with ACRD Conditions of A~roval. In the development of the Property, comply with the terms and conditions of the ACHD Staff Report, or as may be required by ACHD in approving Conditional Use Applications to be filed by DEVELOPER. In cases where ACHD's and the CITY's conditions of approval conflict, the conditions which are more restrictive shall take precedence. k. Canals, Ditches and Waterwavs. Tile all canals, ditches and other waterways and submit evidence of appropriate approvals from the irrigation district and/or downstream water users. The Kennedy Lateral shall be relocated outside of the future ACHD right-of--way on Overland Road in accordance with plans approved by the Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District and the CITY. DEVELOPER shall submit executed license agreement from the Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District prior to obtaining building permits. Ten Mile Creek is excluded from the tiling requirement. 1. Water and Sewer Service. Connect all water and sewer facilities within the Property to the municipal water and sewer service of the City of Meridian. All water and sewer facilities constructed or installed by DEVELOPER on the Property shall be in accordance with plans and specifications therefor which shall be first approved by the CITY. m. Lighting. All lighting will be designed in accordance with Meridian Ordinance Section 2-414.D.3 and approved by the Meridian City Engineer. No glare or illumination of adjacent properties, as determined by the CITY, will be permitted, including impacts to Overland Road and I-84. n. All signage within the Property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Sign Code and the standards set forth in Section 11-2-415 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. All signage shall receive design approval of the Planning & Zoning Department. A-frame signs shall not be permitted. Sign permits must be obtained from the Building Department for all signage. EXHIBIT "B" 2/18/97 INTERSTATE CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Page 3 of 4 • r 5. Maintenance of Improvements. All improvements referenced in this agreement shall be perpetually maintained by the DEVELOPER and/or their successors, heirs and assigns in a neat, aesthetically pleasing and workmanlike manner. EXHIBIT "B" 2/18/97 INTERSTATE CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Page 4 of 4 CENTRAL • •• DISTRICT 'HEALTH DEPARTMENT MAIN OFFICE • 707 N. ARMSTRONG PL. • BOISE, ID 83704-0825 • (208) 3755211 • FAX 321-8500 To prevent and treat disease and disability; to promote healthy lifestyles; and to protect and promote the health and quality of our environment. 99=134 February 2, 1999 R,EcEIV~D F E B - 4 1999 David Navarro Ada County Recorder 650 Main Street Boise, ID 83702 RE: Interstate Center Subdivision (Revised) Dear Mr. Navarro: CITY OF MERIDIAN Central District Health Department, Environmental Health Division. has reviewed the final plat on this subdivision for central water and central sewer facilities. Sanitary Restrictions will be retained on Lots 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, Block 1. No owner shall construct any building,. dwelling, or shelter which necessitates the supplying of water or sewage facilities for persons using such premises until santitary restriction are satisfied and lifted. Sanitary Restrictions are satisfied and removed for Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 19 through 28, Block 1. This final approval was given on February 2, 1999. No lot size may be reduced without prior approval of the health authority. If you have any questions please call. Sincerely, ~ L- ~i~ ~ Thomas E. Schmalz, E. .S. Senior Environmental Health Specialist cc: Tom Turco, Environmental Health Director Martin 0. Jones, Environmental Health Supervisor HUD W.H. Moore Company Briggs Engineering . City of Meridian Serving Palley, Elmore, Boise, and Ada Counties Ada / Boise County Office Ada-WIC Satellite Office Elmore County Office Valley County Office 707 N. Armsrong PI. 1606 Roberts 520 E. 8th Sheet N. 703 N. 1 st Street ID 83704 Boise Boise, 10 83705 Mountain Home, ID 83647 P.O. Box 1448 , Enviro. Health: 327-7499 Ph. 334-3355 Enviro. Health: 587-9225 McCall, ID. 83638 Family Planning: 327-7400 FAX: 334-3355 Family Health: 587-4407 Ph. 634-7194 Immun¢ations: 327-7450 WIC: 587-4409 FAX: 634-2174 Senior Nutrition: 327-7460 FAX: 587-3521 WIC: 327-7488 ~ FAX: 327-8500 • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. SMITH, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., Clty Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 ROBERT D. CORRIE Mayor March 2, 1998 Idaho Power Company 10790 W. Franklin Road Boise, ID 83709 322-2000 388-2402 388-6532 fax 322-2032 Re: Street Lights for Interstate Center Subdivision Phase #1 COUNCIL MEMBERS WALT W. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M. ROUNTREE GLENN R. BENTLEY P & OMMI ION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman MALCOLM MACCOY KEITH BORUP RON MANNING BYRON SMITH Street Lights have been installed by the developer in Interstate Center Subdivision Phase #1. These are 250 watt high pressure sodium lights on steel poles, owned by the City of Meridian with a maintenance agreement with Idaho Power. The three (3) street lights are located at: Lot 1 Block 1 W. Overland Road Lot 23 Block 1 (private road) Lot 5 Block 1 (private road) See attached map for additional information. Please use this letter as your authority to activate these street lights. Sincerely William G. Berg, Jr.. City Clerk Jf'IIV-1N-177! 1! •Gl r"lCUI'1 vlclun m.N~cc~n.wn Joint Trench Coo~tor Boise Operatllon ~,~'~ (208)386-620 _ . FAX (208) 33888-6997 ~'~ CELLULAR (I 08) 859-0181 1 V VV 11V yJ 1 CJy Post-it" Fax No /ti/~ ""'~/. 14.9 pales' ~ To ~ ~ c i Frorn 1 Co,lOepc. Co. Ptlone R vtane • 34 S"L &•$/ Fax w ~ F 7- 4. ~./3 Fax s 1 IDAHO PO R COMPANY ! 10790 LIN ROAD ~ '~~ • P.O. BOX 7~ ' BOISE,IOAHO 83709 e~ocK ! i • I 1 , S 7 1 I I ~ ~ 25a w~lt•r N.P.s. s.~. ~3~ "' ' North i 1 W E ' ' ~_ .~ i PR-3)~ stuff ~ a -4 I 1 I ~ 0 1 '',, , ~• I NOTES: ! I G°~` 1 ~ ' ~/'I to F-145= 1 1/2 tx-s ~ > j%~ ii z' Prirnory Coble is 3/O o1 t2.~ kv in 4' conduit I ~ 3-phose ------ I ~ r` I `~ conduit ! I ~ 1 ?R-2 I II BLOCK - ' I I C a RR~1.; a: j I M 23 2' i j 2, ~~ ~ s I + ! ~ '_ I W 1 .~ ~u 1 1 1 EDY LATE72A6 -~ - - -- - -_ ~s ---_ -- -------.--1 --..--------..---~.-_ i e ~ ~~ ~ w. O~E~~.4NC R0.4p ! OR-15 +L ~` A 1 I '~.!-2S R-1~ ~ i SOUTH 1~/e CORNER ~~ >~s Previous Plat Mop Na. Tox Code ~• ~ 0 /U T ~° Pole/ ranch Ft ~ wirc I Ft. Feeder Ft. Feld Location: Diet. Office: Meridian i Western Lines ! Jab Title: a Phase 1 , I Job Desc: U.G. to 6 Commercial Lots ~ work Raq. c9609170.Q No. d -N 5 KV o MRDN-013 5 KVF 12 12 ar a. ee valtoye: cast. p. . . i N By Date State County o. st, D , Eslirtl0tsd gab 10-22-96 ~D Add 33 Completed Section Township ~ Range Meridian ~ Pbt Map 13 3N 1 W B.M. Plot Mop No. (R-FlLE) W k O d N I Fdr. Map or r er o. 553 12 Entered - Funct. Loeotion w. order NA R/W Permission Feeder Map (F-FILE) Mop 45 2 ~ 7 145 I Govt. Pvt. R.R. Hrry. J.U. O O O O O 1 8507-13 2 )A.~IO POWER CO. TY01RK ORD~'R MAP o zoo aoo Sheet ~ or ~ __ _ - TOTAL P.01 JAN 14 '9? 16 27 PAGE.01 WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. SMITH, Ciry Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., Ciry Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN 7. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney MEMORANDUM: ROBERT D. CORRIE Mayor GOUNGIL MEMBERS WALT W. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M. ROUNTREE GLENN R. BENTLEY P & Z COMMISSION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman MALCOLM MACCOY KEITH BORUP RON MANNING BYRON SMITH Date: Z`Z 3-1 To: Will Berg, City Clerk Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer From: Harold Hudson, Electrical Inspector Re: STREET LIGHT ELECTRICAL INSPECTION I have inspected and approved the elec lights in oQ/ll TeyS TffTr~ can now proceed with the activation. wiring and associated components for _,~ street ~~~ .Idaho Power Co. Harold Hudson, Electrical Inspector • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-221 I Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 C:10FFICE\ W PW IN\GENERAL\ELECMSP. MMO vtt:l un m. W t ECInIMN Post-it-Fax Note /tilt ~°K /, rr~..9 t~ges' ~ • Jo,rtt Trench Coordinator Boise Operatb~ ~~'~ =' (208)388-620 _ . fAX (208) 3888-6997 03) g59-018t CELLULAR ( ~ i To ~ f c~ c ~~ From i Co,iGepc Co. , Pnone R Phont a ~Q• S-L &-8~/ F,x ° ~ F ~- 4 P~3 Fyt t , IDAHO PO R COMPANY D ~ ~ ~ `r~ CUN ROA 10790 FRAN • P.O. BOX Ta O 83709 c , o ' BOISE, IOA e~ a ~ • s ~ ~ I ~ I I ~' 25a w~rr N.P.S. s,~• ~~~ ~ North I I ; W E 1 4 ~ ~ I f ?R- =1~ st 4~ ~ I ~ Nsc.oo. j p . ~ NOTES ~ ~ .on,~m,a , I _ I : I L1O~` 1 t ~ • / ~/1 to F-145= 11/2 tx-s I > /z2 Z' Primary Coble is 3/0 0l 12.E kv in 4' Conduit I •' ~ ~~ ~ 3-phase ------ ' , conduit , I ~ I '} s t ` I 11 8llX7c ~ 1 • ~ ?R-1-: 1 ~ I 23 2• ~, ~ ~ ,.,` z I . '~. i I ~ ~ NEVY LATFRAI - - - -- 1-- - ;s ---~ 70l.6Y 1 - --~ ~---~--~~ ; -------~~-._-------_ ~ y Kati w. O~/ER~ANG ROAD i I O R 25 R is ~ A 1 -or0~ 1~ ; SOUTH l~a CORNER S` Previous Plot Mop No. i O o: z a 0 W Tox Code ~' ~ 0 /U T~'P° Pole/ ronch F ( Wire I Ft ' Feeder Ft. ~'°'~ ~°"°^~ Meridian Dist. Office:; Western Lines ,lob r~l°: Phase 1 I I Job Dex: U.G. to 6 Commercial Lots I W° ~aeq• c9609170.Q ' 5 Kv 5 KVF MRDN 013 12 12 Voltage: Const. op. °ed°r-Na. - . . Br Oote state county Oist. No. EeliRWted geb t0-22-96 ~D Add 33 ' Completed Section Township Rangt Meridian ~ pbt ,~,p 13 3N 1 W B.M. 1 Plot Map No. (R-FlLE) W I Fdr. Mop ork Order No. 553- 12 Entered Funet. location w, order NA R/W Permission Feeder Mop (F-FlI.E) Mop 45 217 145 I ~°"• ~'~• ~•~• "'"' ~•u• O O O O O 18507-13 2 )AHO POWER CO. TY01RK ORDER MAP o 200 aoo Sheet ~ or ' _. ~ _ - TOTAL P.01 JAN 14 '97 162? PAGE.01 . .. • ~' ELECTRICAL PERMIT Iss~.~ed: 1 /(~ /~~~ Permit No: 12064 OWNER/AF'pLICANT------------------------pROpERTY LOCATION------------------------ W. H. MOORE I 1 INTERSTATE CENTER MERIDIAN, ID 83000 I I Lot: Block: Long Legal: 208/000-0000 I Sub: T: S: I pare No: CONTRACTOR------------------ I -----------DESIGNER--------------------------------- ALLOWAY ELECTRIC I 1420 GROVE ST. I BOISE, ID 83702 I 208/344-2507 ~ I 000/000-0000 I r'ROJECT INFO-------------------------------------------------------------------- prj Value: ~3, 600.00 I Temp Service: prj Type: I Residential Service: Occ Type: COMMERCIAL I Number of Raoms: Occ Grp: Occ Load: I Electrical Heat: Cnstr Type: I Number of Circuits: Land Use: IOther:STREETLIGHTS I ='ROJECT NOTES------------------------------------------------------------------- I NSTALLAT I ON OF 3--250 WATT STREETL I GHTS... L 1 B i, L23 B 1, L5 B 1 ='ROJECT FEES ASSESSMENT--------------------------------------------------------- Amount paid: X0.00 TOTAL ELECTRICAL FEE: X106.00 Balance Due: X106.00 Vua un m. N 1 CCLNUan Post-if' Fax Note /6/1 ~°'~ ~ T nch C d' r ~~ ~~,-q Pages re oo mato Jo~r Boise Operat~ ~~~~ (208)388-1i~20 r , FAX (206) 33888-6837 --__.. ~ry~ellc~ a CELLUTAA (i 08) 859-0181 To ~ c ` From , Co,iGepc. Co. PAone a Phont a ;~ Ti-'L &'8'I Fax • ~ F -~ 4 F.~3 Fax • i IDAHO PO R COMPANY 1 10790 IN ROAD ~ ~~ • P.O. BOX 7 ' BOISE, IDAHO 83709 e~oac ~ i , .-{- S ~ ! (~ 1 1 ~ 1 I '~ 25a err N.P.s. s.~. (3~ ~ ^• t ~ North W E ~ `~~, j C1 I ~_ i PR-~• r stuff . I -1 I < -4 ~ ' a ~ ` 1 . ~ ., _- NOTES: j 1 1 e ' ~ on~M ~ ~ < ~ ;)r1 to F-145= 1 1/2 tx-s i • N>> ~' 22 `~.~ Z' Primary eobte is 3/0 0l 12,E kv in 4' conduit _ 1 ~ 3-phase ------ conduit , I t ` _~1 ' i 1 I S I H ?R-2 f ! 6lOCK ~ ~ 1 i l ~ ~ ~ ~ I f•~ ~-, •I 23 ~ 2~ I z _ \\ ~ W Z ` 1 I ' ~ 1 _ ~V ~ \~ -J- I _~- - NED'7 LA .'rERAL -~ - - -- 1S -- _ 1 ~ 7QLfr _I - ----•--•~------ ; -------•- J ------~ 1 WPK'ily W. OVERLANC ROAt) i ~ OR-t5 R 1~ ~ SOUTH t~t CORNE~2• S` Previous Plot Mop Ho. Tax Code '~. ~ o /U T n'° Polt/ ranch F I IKre I Ft. Fsader Ft. Meridian Diet officee' Feld location: 1 Western Lines Job rule: Phase 1 t Job Dssc: U.G. to 6 Commercial Lots ~ worse Req. e9609170.0 No . ' V 013 5 KV M N Feeder-No. Voltage: cons. 12.5 K op. 12. - RD Br Dote state county 07st. No. ~ I:.sGmatsd gab 1o-22-ss 1D Add 33 ' Completed Section Township Rongt Meridian Pbt Mop 13 3N 1 W B.M. 1 Plat Map No (R-FllE) I Fdr. Mop . Work Order No. Entered 553- ~ 2 Funct. location W. Order ' NA R/W Permission Feeder Map (F-FlLE) Mop 45 217 145 j r~~t. °~. R.~. "`"' ~.u• 0 0 0 0 0 18507-13 2 )AHO POWER CO. W01RK ORDER MAP o 20o aoo Sheet ~ or ~ -- ' - TOTAL P.01 JAN 14 '97 16:27 PAGE.01 September 6, 1997 A & S Construction ATTN: Owner 312 East Franklin Rd. Meridian, ID 83642 Dear Sir: ~ ~ . „- ~.~~:,. "fit ~ ~.,~ ~EP 1 ~ i'7 s , This letter is to inform you of an accident which occurred on your construction site on September 3, 1997 at approximately 10:10 p.m. As I was traveling east on Overland Road in Meridian, I struck a pile of gravel approximately 3 %z feet high which was situated in the middle of the right hand lane. I sustained a moderate amount of damage to my Nissan pickup truck. At this time, it appears that I have no physical injuries except for some soreness. There was no construction sign posted nor any other signs upright except fora `detour ahead' sign. There were no reflective barrels placed in front of the pile. However, there were several further behind it, which did not help to warn me of the obstruction since they were out of my view and it was dark at that location. I summoned the police and he took a report of the incident. As you can see from the report, the officer also stated that the `Road Closed to Through Traffic' sign was placed face down at the side of the road and he had to set it upright. Also, I returned to the location shortly after the accident and took pictures. Enclosed are copies of the photographs. I am requesting that your company. pay to repair the damage to my vehicle as I feel the accident occurred due to negligence on your company's part to correctly place the proper warning signs. feel this is fair. I look forward to hearing from you concerning this situation and would like a response within seven days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Sincerely, ~~~~~~~~ ~es E. Blair 4116 W. Blue Creek Dr Meridian, ID 83642 884-5117 c: Ada County Highway District Ciiy of Meridian ~. ~G ~ ICl~ho Vehicle Goliision Report Agency Officer m ITD-905-95M 27-010500-0 Revised t2/21/98 Code # ~ Distict /S No „~ Page 1 Date of Collision Da of Collision Circle Time Police Police EMS EMS Locatio City Or Town ^ N ^ E ^ IN Di t h d S M T~T F S spa c e Arrived Dispatched Arrived / Miles ^ S .l~ W ^ OF If Copision Complete k~catlon to lo: sox # 1 Name of Street On Private Property ~ posted Speed Caunry Interchange # Intersection 1 2 ON - a , of 2 streets Intersection of 2 In the Intersedton wtth: p~ Speed R. R. Crossing i Latitude (GPS) Street and: Parking Lot ! 1, 2, 3 Driveway / All Outside an Intersection Name of Cross Street or # of Ref. Mile Post Marker Cain Loc MBe Point Longitude (GPS) ey 3 ^ Miles N S E W Non-Intersection 1,3 ,~ ,Feet ^ ^ ^ CF ~ UNIT 1 ~ Veh icle O Pedestrian O Pedalcyclist Vehicle Owner Last Fast M.I. Unit Driver Last First M.I. Same as Driver Type ^ Hit & A dress Run As Driver Street Address Home Phone Vehide Year Make (Dodge-Chev.) Model (Dart-Nova) Style (2 Dr.) Unit Use CttY State Zip Code Work Phone Attach 1 Vehide Color License late No. Slate ..Z QQ "~ / ~~~dsZ v ~_ Driver's License No. State Idaho Code # /Violation ^ Cited . Vehide identification o. Est, st of Damage Attach 2 ~ t '`~ ~~ r~ ~ ~~ Sex Date of Birth Prot Dev. Injury Ejection Trapped Transported nsurance Carrier Name Policy Number Passenger Names and Addresses (Unit 1 only, additional Same Address Prot Trans- assen ers on a e 3 as Oriver Seating Sex Date of Birth Dev, njury Ejection Trapped ported D UNIT 2 O Vehicle O Pedestrian O Pedalcyclist Vehicle Owner Last First M.I. Unit Driver Last First M.I. ^ Same as Driver Type ^ Hit & Run Address ^ As Driver Unit Use Street Address Home Phone Vehide Year Make (Dodge-Chev.) Model (Dart-Nova) Style (2 Dr.) Cm' State Zip Code Work Phone Vehide Color License Plate No. State Attach 1 Driver's License No. State Idaho Code # /Violation ^ Cited Vehide Identification No. Est Cost of Damage Attach 2 Sex Date of Birth Prot Dev. Injury Ejection Trapped Transported I nsurance Carrier Name Policy Number Yes O No Passenger Names and Addresses (Unit 2 only, additional Same Address Prot Trans- assen ers on a e 3 as Driver Seating Sex Date of Birth Dev. I nju Ejection Trapped ported Injured Transported To: ~ gy: Front Seating Front 1 2 3 Vehicle 1 4 5 6 4 7 8 9 Motorcycle 7 14 Trailing Unit 99 Other 16 Pedestrian U Unknown 17 Pedalcyde PassengerCodes -Non Trailing Unit 11 Sleeper Sect.(Trudc Cab) 12 Other endosed Passngr./Cargo area 13 Unenclosed PassngrJCargo area 15 Riding on Vehide Exterior Protective Devices 0 None 4 Child Safety 1 Shoulder Beit Only Seat 2 Lap Belt Only 5 Helmet Used 3 Shoulder 8 Lap 6 Nonmotorist Air Bag Equipped 7 Non-Activated Air Bag, Belts in Use 8 Non-Activated Air Bag, No Beks in Use 10 Air Bag Adivaied, Betts in Use 11 Air Bag Activated, No Belts in Use Ejection Trapped 1 Not Ejected 1 Not Trapped 2 Totaly Ejected 2 Trapped /Extrication 3 Partialy Ejected unit used T .Thrown from 3 Trapped !other cyde etc. extrigfion method Injury Unit Type K Dead 1 Pedestrian 8 Pickup with Camper 10 Motorhome A Incapacitating 2 Pedalgde 7 Pickup /Van /Panel / 11 Snowmobile B Non-Incapacitating 3 Motorcyde 4 M d Sport Utility Vehicle 5 ATV C Possible ope 30 Fann Equipment (Ust) 28 Train D None Evident 6 Car 40 Construction Equip. (List) 99 Other Non- U Unknown COmm@rcial Motor Veh. Transported For Medical Care By 1 Ambulance 2 Police Car 3' Helicopter 4 Private Vehide 5 Not Transported 15 Bus 24 Bobtail 21 Single Unit Truck - 2 axle/6 Tires 25 Tractor w/Semi Trailer 22 Single Unit Truck - 3 axle 26 Tractor w/Double Trailer 23 Truck with Trailer 27 Tractor w/Tripie Trailer Unit Use Attachments 1 Police 5 Taxi 2 Ambulance 6 Fire 3 Driver Tmg. 7 Wrecker 4 Government 8 School Bus 1 Boat Trailer 5 Mobile Home 2 Utility Trailer 9 Other 3 Travel Trailer 4 Towed Vehide L._~, 1 Business/Commercial 3 School/Playground 5 Agricultural 7 Residential 2 IndustriallManufaduring 4 Recreational Ares a Undeveloped © Light Conditions 1 Day 3 Dark -Street lights On 5 Dark - No Street Lights 2 DawNDusk 4 Dark -Street Lights Oft Weather Conditions -TwoSelectlons Possible 1 Clear 3 Rain 5 SIeeUHail 7 Blowing DusUSand A Smoke/Smog 2 Cbudy 4 Snow B Fog 8 Severe Cross Winds © Road Surtace Conditions 1 Dry 3 Slush 5 Snow 7 Water 2 Wet 4 Ice 8 Mud 9 Other ® Other Road Conditions 0 None 4 High/Low Shoulder 8 Flooded 1 Ruts/Bumps/Notes 5 Loose GreveUSeal Coat 9 Poor Pavement 2 Slick Asphalt (Bleeding) 6 Under Construction Markings 3 Washboard 7 Lane Closed UNIT # 1 . Officer Case # No. is ~ Road T e 1 2-Way & Raised/Depressed Divider 5 Ramp 2 2-Way 8 2-Way Left Tum Lane Divider 6 Alley 3 One-Way 7 Rest Area 4 2-Way 8 No Divider B Port of Entry A 2-Way & 2 Double Yellow Painted Divider 9 Other Road Surtace Type 1 Concrete 2 Paved (Asphelf/Bridt) 3 GraveUStone 4 Dirt Roadway 1 straight 2 come G@OmetriCS 1 Upgrade/DoNrrlgrade 3 Hillcrest 5 Level Traffic Control 0 None 4 Flashing Beacon 8 Officer/Flagger 1 Stop Sign 5 Trefflc Signal-Pad. Only A School Bus Signal 2 Yield 8 R. R. Gates/Signal B No-Pass Bartier Line 3 Traffic Signal 7 R. R. Flashing Beacon C Construction Signing SPECIFY 1 Functioning 2 NotFundioning 3 Removed Page 2 ~~ -~~ --~ -- •© •-® UNIT # 2 0 None 1 Exceeded Posted Speed 5 Improper Lane Change 11 improper Tum 6 Following Too Cbse 12 Failed to Signal 17 Wheel Defect 18 Light Defect 22 Inattention 23 Vi i 28 Impropery Parked 2 Speed Too Fast for Conditions 7 Drove Left of Center 8 Oil Roadwa / 13 Failed to Yield 14 P d 19 Other Vehicle s on Obstruction 24 Asleep/Drowsy 31 Previous!'.cddent 32 Distraction iNon 3 Too Slow for Tratfic 4 Improper Overtakin y Over Corrected 101 asse Stop Sign 15 Disregarded Signal Defect 21 Alcohol Impaired 25 Sick 26 Fatigued Vehicle (List) 99 Other g mproper Backing 1 B Tire Defect 34 Drug Impaired 27 Physical fmpaimtent 0 None 1 Curve in Road 2 Hill Crest ~s- INITIAL Point of Impact /. / ~-- PRINCIPLE Point of Impact 0 None 3 Roadway Slope/Snowbank 7 Bright Headlights 12 Splash/Spray from Other Vehicle 4 Trees/Crop/Brush 8 Weather Conditions 18 Vehlde Stopped on Roadway 5 Reflection from Surface 10 RaiNSnow/Ice on Windows 13 Moving Vehicle 6 Bright Sunlight 11 Cradced/Dirty Windows 14 Parked Vehicle POINT OF IMPACT Auto /Motorcycle / „ u ~ Tractorwlth Seml Trailer Trailing Unk #1 , u , Trailing Unk #2 , ,• ~ , • . n . « 13 Top8lNlndows ~ ~ ~ 33 Tc +~ « « « 14 Undercarriage ' . 34 Undercarriage „ „ 54 Undercarriage " « « 1 Very Minor 2 Minor 3 Minor/Moderate 4 Moderate INITIAL -~~ Poirrt of Impact PRINCIPLE---a Poirlt of Impact 5 Moderate/Severe 6 Severe 7 Very Severe i owea uue to uamage I Towed By: ^ Yes ~No ~ Towed By: ~ Towed Due to Damage ^ Yes ^ No Driver Of UNIT # 1 ALCOHOL /DRUG INVOLVEMENT Driver of UNlT # 2 C;ya ~ 1 Nei'u`ier Aicohoi or Drugs Detected 2 Yes Alcohol 3 Yes Orugs 4 Yes Both Alcohol Test 1 Drug Test 1 None Given Alcohol ! Dru Test 2 Test Refused 3 Blood Test 4 Urine Test 5 Breath Test a Field Test _ Alcohol Test Drug Test BAC Test Results: Drug Used (if known): Drug Test Results BAC Test Results: Drug Used (if known): Drug Test Results UNIT # 1 COMMERCIAL VEHICLE Refer to Instruetlon Sheet taefore eompletinp UNIT # 2 u I C B argo ody 1 Bus 2 VaNEndosed Box 3 Cargo Tank 4 Flatbed 5 Dump 6 Concrete Muter 7 Auto Trans orter 8 G b /R # Axles VWR-Power GVWR-All Trailers ICC # p ar age e fuse 9 O ther 1 0 Pickup Bed or Load T # For Loa # Axles GVWR-Power VWR-AII Trailers ICC # For oad DOT # For Load Hazard ous ^ placard: ~ s No Spilled: O N Material Haz-Mat # Hazardous Placard: ill S Haz-Mat # o p O N ed: O No Material Carrier Name 8 ICC# or DOT# for Load obtained from 1 Shipping Papers (If Cartier Carrier Name ... 2 Vehicle Side 3 Driver 4 Log Book 9 Other ^ different If Cartier Carrier Name d from Address Vehicle ifferent from Address Owner) City State Vehicle ZrP Owner) City - State Zip 15 Traffic Sign 18 Billboard/Fence 17 Building 99 Other 1 Overturn 2 Separation of Unit 3 Cargo Loss/Shift 4 Jack-Knifed 5 Ran ofi Road 6 Down Hill Runaway 7 Fire/Explosion 8 Gas/Inhalation 9 Other Nonoollision 10 Loss of Control 11 FelUPushed/Jumped 12 Non-Collision injury 13 immersion 71 Came Bade on Rosd 72 Drove lJR of CenEer UNIT # 1 FIRST Harmful Everrt MOST Harmful Event a Driver /Ped Action FIRST EVENT REI-ATIONSHIP TO JUNCTION UNIT # 2 1 In Intersection 3 At Dnveway/Alley 5 On Ramp 7 At Railroad Crossing 2 Intersection Related 4 Driveway/Alley Related 6 Ramp Related 9 Other •~•~_•..+~ .....cca.. ~ rvrv car ~ risaVEL (If fuming, select direction before fuming rral Direction of Street Un1t Direction General DlrecUon of Street Unit DlrecUon O South /North ^ North ^ South O South /North O North O Scutt ~ West /East ,iy'j: East O West ^ West /East O East O West the scene events forALL units in the orcJer 41 Culvert 42 Curb 43 Diteh 44 Embankment 45 Fence 48 Mailbox 47 Tree 48 Building Well 49 Other Fbred Object One Veh. Collision With 14 Pedestrian 24 Bridge Rail 15 Pedalcycle 25 Overpass 18 Railroad Train 28 Guardrail Face 17 DomestlcAnimal 27 Guardrail End 18 Wild Animal 28 Median Banter 19 Other Object 30 Highway Traffic Not Fined Sign Post 20 Parked Vehicle 31 Ovefiesd Sign support on Private property 32 Street Light Support 21 Impact Attenuatot 33 Utility Pole 22 Bridge/Pier/Abutment 39 Other Pole Sideswiped Sideswiped ngle Same Opposite 52 ~/ 5 :~~ 58 Turning Events Head-On An le 54 ~ S9 + 50 Head-On '~ 51 Rear-End Rear-End rtre 80 Backed Into _.~ y~ 81 Parked Veh. 58 . ~ g ~~ 99 Other THE EVENT 1 On Roadway 4 Roadside (Includes Sidewalk) 7 Median A In Parking Lot LOCATION 2 LeR Shoulder 5 Outside Right of Way 8 Gore B Parking Lot Access Road 3 Right Shoulder 6 Ofi Roadway - Loc Unknown 9 Other P Private Prriperty Indicate road names and show ail lanes Show North by Arrow in Circle rroperty Damage (Name of Object Struck -Owner Name and Address) Narrative /Additional Information /Additional Passengers (indicate unit # and all s,/ .d' WITNESSES Name X and # Address Date of Report Photos 7 Y ~ N•~[ N~ ~ ~SY Page 3 FlRST Hamttul Event ^ MOST Hamtful Event ^ Driver /Ped Action ^ Driver Actions 1 Going Straight 14 Starting in Traffic 2 Turning Right 15 Parking 3 Right Tum on Red 1 B Entering Drivwy./Aley 4 Turning leR 17 Leaving Orivuvy./Alley 5 LeR Tum on Red 18 Baddng 6 U-Tum 20 Avoiding Obstacle 7 Merging 21 Avoiding VehJPed. 8 Changing Lanes 22 Pursuing Vehicle 10 Passing 23 Fleeing Pursuit 11 Negotiating Curve 24 Raclng 12 Stopped in Traffic 25 Parked Vehicle 13 Skmring in Traffic 26 Driverless Vehicle In Motion Pedestrian/Pedalcycle Actions 30 Crossing at Painted Intersection 31 Crossing at Unpainted Intersection 35 Crossing at Non-Intersection X•walk 36 Crossing Not at Intersection 40 Waik/Ride with Traffic in Bike Lane 41 Walk/Ride with Traffic No Bike Lane 42 WaIklRide Faring Traffic in Bike Lane 43 Walk/Ride Faring Traffic No Bike Lane 50 Standing on Roadway 51 Playing on Roadway 52 Working on Roadway 80 Enter/Leave School Bus 70 Not on Roadway D9 Other for additional Estimated Damage a State Home Phone Work Phone ~ZS~ i~ ~~ ~~-I Send ORIGINAL to: Office of Highway Safety, P. O. Box 7129, Boise, Idaho 83707-1129 iR~cEl-v~~j CENTRAL •• DISTRICT .Y; s ~ ~ 1Q07 ~tt'HEALTH Y~~ ~~ ~~R~p~AN DEPARTMENT MAIN OFFICE • 707 N. ARMSTRONG Pl. • BOISE, ID 83104-0825 • (208) 375-5211 • FAX 327-8500 To prevent and treat disease and disability; to promote healthy lifestyles; and to protect and promote the health and quality of our environment. 97-388 June 9, 1997 David Navarro Ada County Recorder 650 Main Street Boise, ID 83702 RE: Interstate Center Subdivision Dear Mr. Navarro: Central District Health Department, Environmental Health Division has reviewed the final plat on this subdivision for central water and central sewer facilities. Sanitary Restrictions will be retained on Lots 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 26, 27, 28, Block 1. No owner shall construct any building, dwelling, or shelter which necessitates the supplying of water or sewage facilities for persons using such premises until santitary restriction are satisfied and lifted. Sanitary Restrictions are satisfied and removed for Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 23 and 24, Block 1. This final approval was given on June 9, 1997. No lot size may be reduced without prior approval of the health authority. If you have any questions please call. Sincerely, ~~~yn.f, ~ .C~ Thomas E. Schmalru~ H.S. Senior Environmental Health Specialist cc: Tom Turco, Environmental Health Director Martin O. Jones, Environmental Health Supervisor HUD W.H. Moore Company Briggs Engineering City of Meridian Serving Valley, Elmore, Boise, and Ada Counties Ada /Boise County Office 707 N. Armsrong PI. Boise, ID 83704 Enviro. Health: 327-7499 Family Planning: 327-7400 Immunizations: 327-7450 Senior Nutrition: 327-7460 WIC: 327-7488 FAX: 327-8500 Ada-WIC Satellite Office 1606 Roberts Boise, ID 83705 Ph. 334-3355 FAX: 334-3355 Elmore County Office 520 E. 8th Street N. Mountain Home, ID 83647 Enviro. Health: 587-3521 Family Health: 587-4407 WIC: 587-4409 FAX: 587-3521 Valley County Office 703 N. 1st Street P.O. Box 1448 McCall, ID. 83638 Ph. 634-7194 FAX: 634-2174 i«1 V ~ Meridian City Council , February 18, 1997 Page 38 parking, paving, landscaping requirements and all ordinances of the City of Meridian. A conditional use should be subject to review upon notice to the applicant by the City. Morrow. Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree, second by Mr. Morrow, the decision and recommendation as read, all those approved? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #14: MARTY GOLDSMITH: CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF SALMON RAPIDS SUBDIVISION: Corrie: Is a representative from Salmon Rapids Subdivision here tonight? Smith: Mr. Mayor, 1 have a meeting scheduled with the representatives Thursday morning to discuss this sewer service area issue. So, I don't think anybody is still here from Marty Goldsmith's court. Rountree: Becky is here. (Inaudible) Smith: I think Becky is requesting that we table this until March 4. Corrie: Council, entertain a motion. Morrow. Mr. Mayor, I would move that we table to March 4 for discussion of Salmon Rapids subdivision. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree to table to March 4 on the continued discussion of ,Salmon Rapids Subdivision, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #15: INTERSTATE CENTER: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, CC&R'S AND NON-DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: Corrie: Is there a representative from Interstate? Meridian City Council February 18, 1997 Page 39 Seel: My name is Jonathan Seel with the W.H. Moore Company, 600 North Steelhead, Boise, Idaho. We have reviewed through the development agreement, the CC&R's (inaudible) and also the non-development agreement and we are in agreement with them and we are prepared to sign them. Corrie: Council questions? Morrow: Only for the city attorney, all of these documents have been reviewed and approved by you? Crookston: I have reviewed I think three different sets of ~ them. Ms. Stiles prepared some changes that I have not yet reviewed, she handed them to me tonight. So I have not reviewed those. There are some changes to my understanding from comments t made and gave to Mr. Seel. He prepared some ch~ges to those but I have not Ms. Stiles changes so I would say that I am not in a position to say that I can approve them. Corrie: Is that all three of them counselor? Crookston: That is true. Corrie: Shari, are you prepared to answer some of Walt's questions or I am sorry (inaudible) Morrow. The question was has the counselor reviewed it and these are all approved from his standpoint. The answer is that no they have not been reviewed by him in the final format. Now have you seen them in the final format and they need to go to him so he can review what the final format is? Stiles: He got them just today because I revised them just today. This is probably the 6:n time. Seel: No absolutely not, we provided these documents and the CC&R's and the non- development agreement back in the end of September. We got some comments from Mr. Crookston, I think probably a week and a week and a half ago which we incorporated in the documents and I delivered them to the Mayor at that time. I was under the understanding that these have been reviewed. We are anxious to move on with this thing and we have been dealing with -this since September. We have a one page non-development agreement, we have a 4 or 5 page CC&R agreement. My understanding is the development agreement was approved today, Shari and I went through it. She gave me her final comments, we were in agreement on that and I thought this was all buttoned up. It is not 10:00 tonight and I am sitting here and I am told approximately that these agreements haven't been reviewed at this point. Winston Moore is more than anxious to get this thing wrapped up and is extremely frustrated at this point. And to sit here and then say that owe have gone through 6 or 7 versions we Meridian City Council February 18, 1997 Page 40 haven't. We have provided and we have been waiting for changes. The only changes that I got were some handwritten changes that. you provided a week and a half ago that I picked up. We incorporated those, I delivered them back here and said that was fine, we will put those in. Now I am told that they have been reviewed, excuse my frustration but after you have been dealing with this for 4 or 5 months you get a little frustrated. We are ready to move on with this thing, I don't think it is that complex and I don't know what else to really say. Other than we have basically been at the beck and call, there have been changes and we have made them. Shari gave me changes I got her back red line and she has worked with me on those.. We got those changed, I picked those things up today and we were ready to sign thing this afternoon and now I am told they are not ready. So 1 don't know where we are. Crookston: I can tell the Council that I did no# see what Ms. Stiles and Mr. Seel worked out. Seel: We haven't done anything on the CC&R's and non-development agreement. The only changes that have been done on those have been the changes that you requested. What I have been advised is that Shari does not deal with those things that you deal with those. -Well again I am a little oon#used here on this whole process other than it seems like it is getting a little convoluted. What we would like to ~ is to go ahead and proceed. We want to record this plat (End of Tape) but we haven't changed anything and I met with Mayor Corrie today, he provided me with document that we are under the impression were acceptable as they were. That is the- information that I have given to Winston Moore, we are set we are going to get it approved tonight presumably and everything has been blessed and you can plan on getting them signed tomorrow. So I am sorry for being a little terse here but it is just a certain level of frustration at this point and I don't know what to do. Crookston: Mr. Mayor and Council I can't blame you Mr. Seel, I can't approve these until I have seen them and I specifically talking about the development agreement. Let me interject that I don't know that you can go anywhere until they are afl done. I don't know that the Council should approve the CC~R's or non-development agreement until the development agreement is approved. Seel: Well I don't disagree with that and that is the dilemma that we are at. Again, maybe I am getting mixed signals here but I am told a development agreement is dealing with Shari and that was approved today.- The impression at least that l got was that was okay, it was in the acceptable form. The CC&R's and non-development agreement are essentially your baby and the things that we provided back in September haven't changed other than the f~evv comments that you marked on there and at that time you said you had reviewed and that they were okay. That is when I came over and picked them up. Meridian City Council February 18, 1997 Page 41 Crookston: All I am saying is that I have not reviewed the final document so that I can yes this is what I did, what I prepared and has the changes that I had in it. Because I haven't seen the final document. Seel: Why am I here today, I am sorry I thought we were supposed to be on the agenda tonight to get this approved. Again 1 apologize for being rude here but I am just Corrie: I was under the impression counselor you were going to review these and have it done by Monday, that is what you told me. . Crookston: I can't, Mr. Mayor, I cannot approve them when l get them tonight. (Inaudible) Crookston: I got the development agreement tonight, between the special meeting and the regular meeting. As I understand it Mr. Seel and Shari worked on the document today. Seel: We worked on-the development agreement, the non-development agreement is Crookston: That is what we are talking about. Seel: Okay, I think we are talking about two different issues. The development or the non-development agreement and CC&R's were provided back in September. I called you a week or a week and a half ago. You said they are ready and I said I would come by and pick them up. You had some hand written notes on them, I incorporated that in and I was under the assumption that they were done. We haven't touched them since, I have not talked to Shari about either one of those documents because she has told me that is not her baby. As far as the development agreement that is her responsibility and yes we have gone through it. She made a few changes today, f requested a few changes. I picked up what is an execution document in my mind today at 1:00 assuming that t was coming here tonight with the fact that we would have it blessed. Now I am told that we are not going to have any of the documents (inaudible) and I am presuming now at this point we are looking at potentially two weeks and I don't know how much longer. I think next time you are going to Winston Moore sitting here because he is more than frustrated at this point about this whole process. So I don't know what else to say. Corrie: Jonathan, let me get something clear in my mind, you made some changes in the development agreement and the non-development agreement today with Shari? Seel: No, on the development agreement with Shari, Shari gave me back comments last week, we looked through those. We made, the long and short of it is up until today we made some changes in the development agreement. Shari and I sat by phone Meridian City Council February 18, 1997 Page 42 today, wrapped up a few minor things, there were a few technicalities. With respect to the non-development agreement and CC&R's I have never ta~Ced to Shari about those, I have been advised that Mr. Crookston is responsible for chose. That is why I' have been calling Mr. Crookston on these things and that is why I have also talked to you to wrap those things up. So, we really have two things and at least my understanding we have two people that are assuming responsibility for different documents. But as far as the CC&R's and the non-development agreement v~ have not made any changes in those and I have had no communication with Shari other than that they need to go to Wayne Crookston. So that is where I am right now. Very simply what we are trying to do is we are just trying to get this project through. We are trying to build here a good project for the City and we can't record the plat until we get these things signed and we can't sell any land or talk to any potential investors until we dfl~ that. Even at this point if it was approved tonight we are probably looking at April 1~ before we will have this plat recorded. That is an optimistic scenario. From what I am hearing tonight that is probably out the window. So we have some (inaudible) coming to town this week as I have talked to you that is an issue with people if they think the plat is not approved. They are a little bit reluctant to come forward. So that is where it is right now, and I appreciate apologies but what I need is results right now. I need something that has been approved that I can come in front of you and we can get hopefully approved. have spent a lot of time on the development agreement ~d Shari has. The non- development is one page, it should be pretty straight forward. So help me. Rountree: I question where we are, the CC8~R's and non-development agreement are okay? Crookston: I believe they are, I have not seen the final dooument but if they. are the same as what I have already reviewed then they are fine. The only question that I have is that in the development agreement because changes were made today. Morrow. Mr. Mayor, if I might offer for point of clarification here Mr. Seel is yes Ms. Stiles does work with the body of the development agreement. But the Council's charge to the City Attorney is that he is to review all of those from a legal standpoint to make sure that everything in fact is as we as a Council went it. In this particular instance based on what City Attorney Crookston is telling me is that the CC&R's and the non-development agreement he was in agreement with. in terms of (inaudible) verbal reply from your perspective that everything was fine. He has not seen the very final document that has changes (inaudible) Seel: That is absolutely correct. Morrow. In terms of the development agreement if changes v~ere being made as late as this afternoon how could that document have gone from the two of you working on it to him for review so that when we ask the question as a Council is the development Meridian City Council February 18, 1997 Page 43 agreement okay from a legal standpoint, his answer is t don't know I haven't seen it. And you are telling us that you guys were working on it yet this afternoon. Seel: We were working on and there have been delays and some changes that were promised on February 6. We have been pushing it from this end. I don't know what the arrangement is between Shari Stiles and Wayne Crookston (inaudible) Shari was handling that. I was under the impression that whatever changes were made and acceptable for her would be appropriate and the reason for being here tonight is simply to have these things approved. So I don't disagree with, the fact that there were some changes although not substantive changes, but yes changes as of today. But, again, I am going on what l have been advised and I was under the impression that I would come here tonight and that all of the documents were: in a form that was acceptable to be signed and that we could simply move on with this. So, again it is just some of my frustration because a lot of this stuff has taken I®nger than I think we have all anticipated. I am just trying to get this accomplished so that we can get this approved. Morrow. I understand what your frustration is and I ue~derstand where you are trying to go with it. Seel: Again I apologize if I am being rude, I .don't mean to, it is just 10:00 and it has been a long day and you kind of think you are going. to give birth to a child and you have to go home again. Morrow: Point of discussion Mayor, I think basically as a Council we can do one of two things. We have always indicated to our staff and to our people when we approve something what it is we want is we want and in its final format we want obviously final format means that City Attorney Crookston has reviewed everything from a legal standpoint no matter what the document might be. That we are empowering the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Only a Council can provide that function. Essentially to get to that goal now we have two choices. One is that we could table this until our next meeting in which case we have these assurances that it has in fact been done. Or the second choice we have is we can empower the Mayor to sign and the clerk to attest upon successful conclusion and of review by City Attorney Crookston. If that occurs at weeks end then fine so be it, if that occurs the 3`~ of March so be it. I guess from my perspective is that I want the assurances from City ~lttomey Crookston on record that he has reviewed and everything is satisfactory before any signature occurs on the part of the Mayor and the City Clerk. I don't want to put the City or two individuals that occupy those positions in the position of going beyond what we are held to by City ordinance and State statute and so on and so ford. So I see it as two potential solutions both of which are acceptable to me. Seel: If I could at least put some input I would Morrow. I think this is a discussion of the Council Meridian City Council February 18, 1997 Page 44 Rountree: Mr. Mayor, in order for me to I guess concur in the second option that Councilman Morrow I would need some assurances from Shari that in fact the changes made today were minor and not of substance. Then I would throw out a third option that possibly we could take this up in our planning meeting or have we not scheduled that one. Or can that be done? Corrie: No decisions can be made at planning meetings, you need a special meeting. Rountree: Okay, my question then would be to Shari were the changes you worked out today of minor substance and do you feel your issues and concems and the City's concerns have been taken care of. Stiles: Councilman Rountree and Mayor and Council I think that what we have ended up with is in substantial compliance with what you have in your packet. There would be some minor changes and Jonathan has spent a lot of time on this and has actually improved a lot of the wording that was repetitive and didn't, the terms that didn't match up. So he has put a lot of work into it. Part of the problem was in some of the reviews we would do the reviews send him a copy then They would review it and send us back a copy that wasn't the same as what we though we had discussed previously. So we worked out the- final details of that on the phone today and I believe it is a good document. Rountree: But the changes are not of major substance? Stiles: I don't believe them to be no. Crookston: Excuse me are we talking about o~y the development agreement? Stiles: Only the development agreement. Seel: I would like to interject too that I think Shari has put a great deal of time and effort in this and I appreciate her getting it bads as quickly as she has. So she deserves credit in this too. Tolsma: Mr. Mayor, 1 believe with Mr. Moore's track record of what the projects he has done in Boise and Meridian and everything in the past and with the minor changes that Shari says was recommended and what the attorney that has previously reviewed the CC&R's and development agreements even though the changes possibly are minor or he hasn't reviewed the final documents I would agree with Walt's second choice that possibly we instruct the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest if the review from the City Attorney on the final document is favorable. Bentley: Second Meridian City Council February 18, 1997 Page 45 Corrie: Motion is made and seconded, made by Mr. Tolsma, second by Mr. Bentley that the development agreement, non-development agreement and CCS~R's be approved, that the Mayor sign and the Clerk to attest on the final approval of the City Attorney's office. Any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Corrie: I might just add Jonathan, there was a change in, the development that t wasn't aware of. So just so you and I are still (Inaudible) Mr. Crookston if you will do that for us posthaste. Seel: Thank you very much and again t apologize if I came across a little strong but (inaudible). ITEM #16: TED CUNNINGHAM: REQUEST FOR HOOK UP TO CITY SEWER AT 125 BLUE HERON LANE: Corrie: Is Mr. Cunningham here this evening? Berg: I am not here to represent Mr. Cunningham but I did have a conversation with him this afternoon.. He is requesting to table this item, this request until March 4, the reason being is they are doing some test holes out on his property. There might be a possibility that he can put in another drain field or not depending on what Central District Health tells him. So he would like to table this item until March 4. Morrow. So moved Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree to table the request for hook up to City sewer at 125 Blue Heron Lane to March 4, 1997, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #17: DEPARTMENT REPORTS: Corrie: I guess I would like to have Mr. Bentley, can you give us a run down on the, Dave Hanson is here, Council has received the packet which is a proposal that he has made to do the preliminary study on the rec. center on the preschematic work plan. I think a couple of the three people here know about it. To make sure everybody on Council is aware of what this is. If he has any questions they can ask him and then we will go forward. ' Meridian City Council • • February 18, 1997 Page 38 parking, paving, landscaping requirements and all ordinances of the City of Meridian. A conditional use should be subject to review upon notice to the applicant by the City. Morrow. Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree, second by Mr. Morrow, the decision and recommendation as read, all those approved? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #14: MARTY GOLDSMITH: CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF SALMON RAPIDS SUBDIVISION: Corrie: Is a representative from Salmon Rapids Subdivision here tonight? Smith: Mr. Mayor, 1 have a meeting scheduled with the representatives Thursday morning to discuss this sewer service area issue. So, I don't think anybody is still here from Marty Goldsmith's court. Rountree: Becky is here. (Inaudible) Smith: I think Becky is requesting that we table this until March 4. Corrie: Council, entertain a motion. Morrow. Mr. Mayor, I would move that we table to March 4 for discussion of Salmon Rapids subdivision. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree to table to March 4 on the continued discussion of Salmon Rapids Subdivision, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #15: INTERSTATE CENTER: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, CC&R'S AND NON-DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: Corrie: Is there a representative from Interstate? Meridian City Council • • February 18, 1997 Page 39 Seel: My name is Jonathan Seel with the W.H. Moore Company, 600 North Steelhead, Boise, Idaho. We have reviewed through the development agreement, the CC&R's (inaudible) and also the non-development agreement and we are in agreement with them and we are prepared to sign them. Corrie: Council questions? Morrow. Only for the city attorney, all of these documents have been reviewed and approved by you? Crookston: I have. reviewed I think three different sets of them. Ms. Stiles prepared some changes that I have not yet reviewed, she handed them to me tonight. So I have not reviewed those. There are some changes to my understanding from comments I made and gave to Mr. Seel. He prepared some changes to those but I have not Ms. Stiles changes so I would say that I am not in a position to say that I can approve them. Corrie: Is that all three of them counselor? Crookston: That is true. Corrie: Shari, are you prepared to answer some of Walt's questions or I am sorry (inaudible) Morrow. The question was has the counselor reviewed it and these are all approved from his standpoint. The answer is that no they have not been reviewed by him in the final format. Now have you seen them in the final format and they need to go to him so he can review what the final format is? Stiles: He got them just today because I revised them just today. This is probably the 6:n time. Seel: No absolutely not, we provided these documents and the CC&R's and the non- development agreement back in the end of September. We got some comments from Mr. Crookston, I think probably a week and a week and a half ago which we incorporated in the documents and I delivered them to the Mayor at that time. I was under the understanding that these have been reviewed. We are anxious to move on with this thing and we have been dealing with this since September. We have a one page non-development agreement, we have a 4 or 5 page CC&R agreement. My understanding is the development agreement was approved today, Shari and I went through it. She gave me her final comments, we were in agreement on that and I thought this was all buttoned up. It is not 10:00 tonight and I am sitting here and I am told approximately that these agreements haven't been reviewed at this point. Winston Moore is more than anxious to get this thing wrapped up and is extremely frustrated at this point. And to sit here and then say that we have gone through 6 or 7 versions we Meridian City Council . • February 18, 1997 Page 40 haven't. We have provided and we have been waiting for changes. The only changes that I got were some handwritten changes that you provided a week and a half ago that I picked up. We incorporated those, I delivered them back here and said that was fine, we will put those in. Now I am told that they have been reviewed, excuse my frustration but after you have been dealing with this for 4 or 5 months you get a little frustrated. We are ready to move on with this thing, I don't think it is that complex and I don't know what else to really say. Other than we have basically been at the beck and call, there have been changes and we have made them. Shari gave me changes I got her back red line and she has worked with me on those. We got those changed, I picked those things up today and we were ready to sign thing this afternoon and now I am told they are not ready. So I don't know where we are. Crookston: I can tell the Council that I did not see what Ms. Stiles and Mr. Seel worked out. Seel: We haven't done anything on the CC&R's and non-development agreement. The only changes that have been done on those have been the changes that you requested. What I have been advised is that Shari does not deal with those things that you deal with those. Well again I am a little confused here on this whole process other than it seems like it is getting a little convoluted. What we would like to do is to go ahead and proceed. We want to record this plat (End of Tape) but we haven't changed anything and I met with Mayor Corrie today, he provided me with document that we are under the impression were acceptable as they were. That is the information that I have given to Winston Moore, we are set we are going to get it approved tonight presumably and everything has been blessed and you can plan on getting them signed tomorrow. So I am sorry for being a little terse here but it is just a certain level of frustration at this point and I don't know what to do. Crookston: Mr. Mayor and Council 1 can't blame you Mr. Seel, I can't approve these until I have seen them and 1 specifically talking about the development agreement. Let me interject that I don't know that you can go anywhere until they are all done. I don't know that the Council should approve the CC&R's or non-development agreement until the development agreement is approved. Seel: Well I don't disagree with that and that is the dilemma that we are at. Again, maybe I am getting mixed signals here but I am told a development agreement is dealing with Shari and that was approved today. The impression at least that I got was that was okay, it was in the acceptable form. The CC&R's and non-development agreement are essentially your baby and the things that we provided back in September haven't changed other than the few comments that you marked on there and at that time you said you had reviewed and that they were okay. That is when I came over and picked them up. Meridian City Council • • February 18, 1997 Page 41 Crookston: All I am saying is that I have not reviewed the final document so that I can yes this is what I did, what I prepared and has the changes that I had in it. Because I haven't seen the final document. Seel: Why am I here today, 1 am sorry I thought we were supposed to be on the agenda tonight to get this approved. Again I apologize for being rude here but I am just Corrie: I was under the impression counselor you were going to review these and have it done by Monday, that is what you told me. Crookston: I can't, Mr. Mayor, I cannot approve them when I get them tonight. (Inaudible) Crookston: I got the development agreement tonight, between the special meeting and the regular meeting. As I understand it Mr. Seel and Shari worked on the document today. Seel: We worked on the development agreement, the non-development agreement is Crookston: That is what we are talking about. Seel: Okay, I think we are talking about two different issues. The development or the non-development agreement and CC&R's were provided back in September. I called you a week or a week and a half ago. You said they are ready and I said I would come by and pick them up. You had some hand written notes on them, I incorporated that in and I was under the assumption that they were done. We haven't touched them since, I have not talked to Shari about either one of those documents because she has told me that is not her baby. As far as the development agreement that is her responsibility and yes we have gone through it. She made a few changes today, I requested a few changes. I picked up what is an execution document in my mind today at 1:00 assuming that I was coming here tonight with the fact that we would have it blessed. Now I am told that we are not going to have any of the documents (inaudible) and I am presuming now at this point we are looking at potentially two weeks and I don't know how much longer. I think next time you are going to Winston Moore sitting here because he is mare than frustrated at this point about this whole process. So I don't know what else to say. Corrie: Jonathan, let me get something clear in my mind, you made some changes in the development agreement and the non-development agreement today with Shari? Seel: No, on the development agreement with Shari, Shari gave me back comments last week, we looked through those. We made, the long and short of it is up until today we made some changes in the development agreement. Shari and I sat by phone Meridian City Council • • February 18, 1997 Page 42 today, wrapped up a few minor things, there were a few technicalities. With respect to the non-development agreement and CC&R's I have never talked to Shari about those, I have been advised that Mr. Crookston is responsible for those. That is why I have been calling Mr. Crookston on these things and that is why I have also talked to you to wrap those things up. So, we really have two things and at least my understanding we have two people that are assuming responsibility for different documents. But as far as the CC&R's and the non-development agreement we have not made any changes in those and I have had no communication with Shari other than that they need to go to Wayne Crookston. So that is where I am right now. Very simply what we are trying to do is we are just trying to get this project through. We are trying to build here a good project for the City and we can't record the plat until we get these things signed and we can't sell any land or talk to any potential investors until we do that. Even at this point if it was approved tonight we are probably looking at April 1~ before we will have this plat recorded. That is an optimistic scenario. From what I am hearing tonight that is probably out the window. So we have some (inaudible) coming to town this week as I have talked to you that is an issue with people if they think the plat is not approved. They are a little bit reluctant to come forward. So that is where it is right now, and I appreciate apologies but what I need is results right now. I need something that has been approved that I can come in front of you and we can get hopefully approved. I have spent a lot of time on the development agreement and Shari has. The non- development is one page, it should be pretty straight forward. So help me. Rountree: I question where we are, the CC&R's and non-development agreement are okay? Crookston: I believe they are, I have not seen. the final document but if they are the same as what I have already reviewed then they are fine. The only question that I have is that in the development agreement because changes were made today. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, if I might offer for point of clarification here Mr. Seel is yes Ms. Stiles does work with the body of the development agreement. But the Council's charge to the City Attorney is that he is to review all of those from a legal standpoint to make sure that everything in fact is as we as a Council want it. In this particular instance based on what .City Attorney Crookston is telling me is that the CC&R's and the non-development agreement he was in agreement with in terms of (inaudible) verbal reply from your perspective that everything was fine. He has not seen the very final document that has changes (inaudible) Seel: That is absolutely correct. Morrow. In terms of the development agreement if changes were being made as late as this afternoon how could that document have gone from the two of you working on it to him for review so that when we ask the question as a Council is the development Meridian City Council ~ • February 18, 1997 Page 43 agreement okay from a legal standpoint, his answer is I don't know I haven't seen it. And you are telling us that you guys were working on it yet this afternoon. Seel: We were working on and there have. been delays and some changes that were promised on February 6. We have been pushing it from this end. I don't know what the arrangement is between Shari Stiles and Wayne. Crookston (inaudible) Shari was handling that. I was under the impression that whatever changes were made and acceptable for her would be appropriate and the reason for being here tonight is simply to have these things approved. So I don't disagree with the fact that there were some changes although not substantive changes, but yes changes as of today. But, again, I am going on what I have been advised and I was under the impression that 1 would come here tonight and that afl of the documents were in a form that was acceptable to be signed and that we could simply move on with this. So, again it is just some of my frustration because a lot of this stuff has taken longer than I think we have all anticipated. I am just trying to get this accomplished so that we can get this approved. Morrow. I understand what your frustration is and I understand where you are trying to go with it. Seel: Again I apologize if I am being rude, I don't mean to, it is just 10:00 and it has been a long day and you kind of think you are going to give birth to a child and you have to go home again. Morrow. Point of discussion Mayor, I think basically as a Council we can do one of two things. We have always indicated to our staff and to our people when we approve something what it is we want is we want and in. its final format we want obviously final format means that City Attorney Crookston has reviewed everything from a legal standpoint no matter what the document might be. That we are empowering the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Only a Council can provide that function. Essentially to get to that goal now we have two choices. One is that we could table this until our next meeting in which case we have these assurances that it has in fact been done. Or the second choice we have is we can empower the Mayor to sign and the clerk to attest upon successful conclusion and of review by City Attorney Crookston. If that occurs at weeks end then fine so be it, if that occurs the 3`d of March so be it. I guess from my perspective is that I want the assurances from City Attorney Crookston on record that he has reviewed and everything is satisfactory before any signature occurs on the part of the Mayor and the City Clerk. I don't want to pu# the City or two individuals that occupy those positions in the position of going beyond what we are held to by City ordinance and State statute and so on and so forth. So I see it as two potential solutions both of which are acceptable to me. Seel: If 1 could at least put some input I would Morrow. I think this is a discussion of the Council Meridian City Council . • February 18, 1997 Page 44 Rountree: Mr. Mayor, in order for me to I guess concur in the second option that Councilman Morrow I would need some assurances from Shari that in fact the changes made today were minor and not of substance. Then I would throw out a third option that possibly we could take this up in our planning meeting or have we not scheduled that one. Or can that be done? Corrie: No decisions can be made at planning meetings, you need a special meeting. Rountree: Okay, my question then would be to Shari were the changes you worked out today of minor substance and do you feel your issues and concems and the City's concerns have been taken care of. Stiles: Councilman Rountree and Mayor and Council I think that what we have ended up with is in substantial compliance with what you have in your packet. There would be some minor changes and Jonathan has spent a lot of time on this and has actually improved a lot of the wording that was repetitive and didn't, the terms that didn't match up. So he has put a lot of work into it. Part of the problem was in some of the reviews we would do the reviews send him a copy then they would review it and send us back a copy that wasn't the same as what we though we had discussed previously. So we worked out the final details of that on the phone today and I believe it is a good document. Rountree: But the changes are not of major substance? Stiles: I don't believe them to be no. Crookston: Excuse me are we talking about only the development agreement? Stiles: Only the development agreement. Seel: I would like to interject too that I think Shari has put a great deal of time and effort in this and I appreciate her getting it back as quickly as she has. So she deserves credit in this too. Tolsma: Mr. Mayor, I believe with Mr. Moore's track record of what the projects he has done in Boise and Meridian and everything in the past and with the minor changes that Shari says was recommended and what the attorney that has previously reviewed the CC&R's and development agreements even though the changes possibly are minor or he hasn't reviewed the final documents I would agree with Walt's second choice that possibly we instruct the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest if the review from the City Attorney on the final document is favorable. Bentley: Second Meridian City Council , • February 18, 1997 Page 45 Corrie: Motion is made and seconded, made by Mr. Tolsma, second by Mr. Bentley that the development agreement, non-development agreement and CC&R's be approved, that the Mayor sign and the Clerk to attest on the final approval of the City Attorney's office. Any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Corrie: I might just add Jonathan, there was a change in the development that I wasn't aware of. So just so you and I are still (Inaudible) Mr. Crookston if you will do that for us posthaste. Seel: Thank you very much and again I apologize if I came across a little strong but (inaudible). ITEM #16: TED CUNNINGHAM: REQUEST FOR HOOK UP TO CITY SEWER AT 125 BLUE HERON LANE: Corrie: Is Mr. Cunningham here this evening? Berg: 1 am not here to represent Mr. Cunningham but I did have a conversation with him this afternoon. He is requesting to table this item, this request until March 4, the reason being is they are doing some test holes out on his property. There might be a possibility that he can put in another drain field or not depending on what Central District Health tells him. So he would like to table this item until March 4. Morrow: So moved Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second hook up to City sewer at 125 Blue Hero discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? by Mr. Rountree to table the request for n Lane to March 4, 1997, any further MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #17: DEPARTMENT REPORTS: Corrie: 1 guess I would like to have Mr. Bentley, can you give us a run down on the, Dave Hanson is here, Council has received the packet which. is a proposal that he has made to do the preliminary study on the rec. center on the preschematic work plan. I think a couple of the three people here know about it. To make sure everybody on Council is aware of what this is. If he has any questions they can ask him and then we will go forward. M~1k 111997 CITY t7~ MERIDIAN ~~~ ~ ~ . 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-888-6201 Phones: Area Code 208 6 March 1997 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Boise 343-1884 _ SHOP: Nampo 466-0663 Jonathan Seel Boise 345-2431 W. H. Moore Company 600 N. Stee/head Way Boise, /G 33704 RE.• Landscaping P/an - /nterstate Center -Kennedy Latera/ Dear Jonathan: This letter is an approval for the landscaping p/an dated 04 March 1997 on the above mentioned project. The District has previous agreements approving a /andscaping p/an for this area, therefore, no further review is required. As a reminder, the District will not a/low more than one foot of berming over the top of the newly relocated Kennedy Lateral. P/ease fee/ free to contact me if further discussion is required. .Sincere/y, John P. Anderson, Water Superintendent NAMPA & MER/DIAN lRR/GA TION D/STRICT JPA: d/n pc: File Each Director Secretary-Treasurer Asst. Water Superintendent Attorney - D. Steenson vEify of Meridian - S. Stiles APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 - -_ --_ F 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-888-6201 Phones: Area Code 208 ~.ti Mr. Stan McHutchison Briggs Engineering, /nc 1111 S. Orchard. Ste. 600 Boise, Idaho 83705 RE: /nterstate Center /Pressurized !rrigation System Dear Stan: OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Boise 343-1884 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Boise 345-2431 The Nampa & Meridian /rrigation District has comp/eted a review of the above mentioned subdivision. The pressure irrigation plans appear to be adequate to meet the Nampa & Meridian /rrigation District's specifications. There is one change that will need to be made, you indicated a 1 "galvanized riser for each property and the District's standards require a 3/4"galvanized pipe. In a tolephone conversation this-afternoon this was mentioned and you said it would be changed. We will need to receive upgraded plans indicating this change. The District also requires that we have a pressure urban irrigation system contract in place before final acceptance is given. P/ease have your clients contact Ms. Laura Burri at 342-4591 and ask that she prepare this contract to be considered by the District's Board of Directors at the next availab/e board meeting. When the above mentioned requests have been met, the Nampa & Meridian /rrigation District will give its final approval. Please feel free to contact me if you feel further discussion is required. Sinc rely, ^G%~ . ~,' John P. Anderson, Water Superintendent NAMPA & MER/DIAN IRRIGATION D/STRICT JPA: dln pc: Fi/e Each Director Secretary-Treasurer Asst. Secretary-Treasurer Asst. Water Superintendent Pressure /rrigation Specialist - T. Clinton Attorney - L. Burri .-eiiy of Meridian Sharp & Smith - J. Sharp Ada County Development Services faxed to Briggs Engineering, Inc. APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 13 February 1997 • • Meridian City Council October 15, 1996 Page 8 would know what you would have to do. It wouldn't be a long term conflict. My concern is until we get better defined here, if the County has one set of standards that they are willing to zone to that are different than ours and three ar four years from now then this becomes a property to be annexed. The new development is not compatible with the rest of the City's development. So I think before I make any kind of a decision or recommendation I would want really strong assurances that it is our ordinances and statutes that would be followed so that at some point in the future it is totally compatible to everything else we are doing there. Particularly because it is a corner piece that will front at the intersection of 2 major roads. Rountree: Mr. Mayor I feel the same way, if we consider anything for this corner it should be on our terms and our ordinances and not kind of open to the County for their interpretation of what they would like to have happen there. Hoffman: You will pardon the what if but if there were, if their zoning requirement for a type of use, there was one that was very compatible with the one that was a limited office development that the City adopts then that would serve as a reason to continue with this process and we may be able to come to an agreement, is that what I am hearing or did I not put that very well. Corrie: Well I think it is, we are looking at three things, your step over annexation, whether the standards are the same with the City and County if we do that and is the ordinance compatible with what the City has because that is going to be right in the middle of the City one of these days. So we want to make sure all of the ordinances are all compatible. So we need to have the staff check out, particularly (inaudible) and see if those other ordinances are coming into play and then we will have a little more information for you. It is a little difficult right now because we don't know those three answers. Hoffman: I will try to get all the information I can to you staff and perhaps later we can approach you with (inaudible). ITEM #5: FINAL PLAT: INTERSTATE CENTER BY W.H. MOORE COMPANY: Corrie: Becky? Bowcutt: We did receive stafias comments concerning the final plat. I did fax over statements in regards to those comments. The final plat that you see here is pretty much consistent with the preliminary plat that was approved by this body a few months ago with the exception of Lot 5. Previously that was four smaller lots and we have merged it into one large lot. That was due to the fact that we have a potential buyer for that particular lot and they needed a parcel of that size. Just to quickly go through these comments. The • • Meridian City Council October 15, 1996 Page 9 Kennedy lateral just to refresh your memory comes across Overland Road and runs in a westerly direction along our southerly boundary. That facility will be piped. We have submitted plans to Nampa Meridian Irrigation District to pipe the facaiity. We have had multiple meetings to coordinate this effort. Nampa Meridian has agreed that if we provide the materials and do the trenching that they will provide the labor if done during the off season in the winter so it is done exactly the way they want it. There is an existing 55 foot easement that will encroach into the right of way so therefore when we relocate the Kennedy outside of the future right of way we will have to provide an additional easement on the plat for that. It is not delineated on this plat because I am waiting for Nampa Meridian Irrigation District's response on the plans to see how wide tha# easement needs to be. A lot of times once we pipe a facility they no longer need such a wide easement, 55 fees is pretty wide. They will relinquish their rights to the existing easements once we have provided the new easement. To my knowledge we have no wells or septic systems on the property but however if one is found we will comply with the City ordinance on removal of those facilities in an appropriate manner. We are in the process of obtaining an geotechnical engineer to evaluate the soil conditions and ground water elevations. We will be providing that detail to staff. Restrictive covenants were submitted to the staff, I believe a revised version was faxed over just a few days ago or this week that addresses maintenance of common areas and the private roadway long term maintenance. The question on the comment sheet was on pressurized irrigation. Under the ordinance we are required even though it is commercial development to provide pressurized irrigation. We will comply with the ordinance. Our hopes that the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District will accept maintenance and ownership of the facility. So we have to submit plans to them for their review if constructed in accordance with their specifications then vie typically have no problem with them accepting future ownership and maintenance. That is our intent. We have the floodplain that is along this area here staff asked that we delineate that on the plat. I have supplied staff with a revised final plat which delineates that floodplain. We will not be taking it out of the flood plain area, it is a 500 year floodplain and it just is right along this comer here. So the impact of that on the future development of the lots is almost nil. One quesion we did have, there was a comment on, the plat dogs border a potential greenbelt. We do abut the Ten Mile Creek, however there is no way to access that because it dead ends into Interstate 84 to the north. So ! am not sure how we could incorporate that into a pedestrian or bicycle greenbelt. If they mean greenbelt by landscaping that is different. I guess I need a determination on what is the definition of greenbelt. Also we are cut off on the east side due to that overpass and there is another private property between us and the public right of way. But there is just now way to get people here that can't go anywhere. There is an existing easement on that Ten Mile Creek under Bureau of Reclamation. There is also a sewer easement running parallel along the Ten Mile that accommodates the trunk line. 1 think I have hit on most of the comments. The site specific comments were just things that they wanted either clarified or corrections on the plat. Which we have done with the exception of one item and that is item 4 and has • Meridian City Council October 15, 1996 Page 10 a subsection 1. They asked us to delete the sentence on this first note, I #hink Mr. Seel is going to address that. The reason we. did not is Mr. Seel had some questions concerning deletion of that language or incorporate an additional language. Do you have any questions that I can answer? Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I have a question, item 7, it says (inaudible) by the first development in each respective phase. What specifically does that mean? Bowcutt: We are platting this as in its entirety. However we are doing two construction phases. The first construction phase will incorporate these lots and we will come down here and bring this street here and we have this little knuckle here that will be a culdesac and then we will pull this lot in here. The second construction phase would go from this point over and out. Morrow: f guess my real question is when is the landscape constn.~tion slated to be done? Bowcutt: Mr. Seel I think will probably want to address that, they will go in and the developer is going to landscape the entrance, because the intent when we came through a preliminary was to have that landscaping in place and not done piece meal. However they want to do this stretch of landscaping along Overland Road that abuts these future lots when they go in and construct the second construction phase due to the fact that they are putting in the approaches and they fear that they will end up damaging the landscaped area when they install the utilities. Morrow: So the answer then is that after the construction, you are not meaning this to say that when the first building is built then the landscaping will be put in. You are indicating that it will be put in after the construction of the utilities and those kinds of things? Bowcutt: For this first construction phase. Yes, I believe that is what we agreed to on the prelimin~-ry plat was that it would be done in that fashion 2;id not done as each lot developed. We did propose to do it as each lot developed however the Council disagreed with that because they wanted to see that entrance corridor right there at Overland completed. Morrow: That was the answer I was trying to get. My next question is under site specific comments number 16, 5 foot sidewalks will be provided on both sides of the irtterior private streets and along the north side of Overland Road abutting the parcel. 1 guess I don't have a problem with the north side of Overland Road abutting the parcel but on private streets why sidewalks on both sides of the streets in a commercial development? Bowcutt: What we were looking for was future dedication of the streets in order to qualify • • Meridian City Council October 15, 1996 Page 11 for dedication in the future if they see fit, ACRD would require 5 foot sidewalks on both sides. They only require sidewalks on one side in an industrial subdivision. Morrow: Thank you Bentley: Mr. Mayor, Becky I want to back up on that question, either 1 misunderstood or I don't think Walt caught what you said, on the landscaping, on the second phase when is that going to go in? Is it after the utility construction is done? Bowcutt: After the utility construction is done for the second phase. It is a two phase, we are platting the entire project, however we will only build and they would obviously only sell and occupy that which is constructed here. So therefore they would put in this landscaping here. When they construct the second phase then this would have to be put in, that corridor, after utilities are put in, sidewalks and so forth. One of the problems we have is they really tear up the landscaping when they go in and put utilities and they lay that sidewalk in. You create your parameters with you improvements and we wouldn't have that. Crookston: Mr. Mayor, just a comment, the Council can see quite well when you say here and here but when we try and transcribe it, it doesn't show what you are showing. Bowcutt: I can reference it by lot number. The first construction phase would consist of Lot 2, 3, 4, 5, 22 and 23 of Block 1. Crookston: Thank you. Seel: My name is Jonathan Seel with W.H. Moore Company. A couple of things that I would like to do as far as maybe getting some clarification on a few things. As Becky mentioned we initially proposed this as or visualize this as one phase. It (inaudible) with this development of this Lot 5 it has become evident to us as she discussed would be as two phases so 1 think there are a couple of questions which I would like to clarify. The first off, is if you recall back when we came for the plat, the desire was to have a 20 foot buffer zone or landscape zone along here. The idea being that this would give some, improve the aesthetics of the development and ensure that you have landscaping through here. At this point Select Development which you are going to be hearing on the CU just after this one is going to be bringing in a family entertainment center. The site plan is located over there. What they are going to do is they are going to carry a landscape theme through the entire thing. It is going to be the ponds, it is going to be the bumper pools, it is going to be park. I guess what I would like to suggest to you and ask you is given that it seems like it is not necessary at this point to go ahead and put a 20 foot buffer zone in here which has to be maintained by owners association. When the entire theme of this amusement park ,~ • • Meridian City Council October 15, 1996 Page 12 which is approximately 7 acres will be carried all the way through it. You are almost going to have a break between the landscape that potentially would be put up here and the landscape of the park One of the things that I would ask here tonight is that with this and if you approve the CU and I am being presumptuous at this moment, but if you do this and as you can see the theme over there that you allow them to just go ahead and carry their theme right up to the edge and we eliminate this 20 foot buffer zone. Again I think you still get what you have been looking for which is an attractive appearance from I-84. So I think you get that and we can avoid having two different types of landscapes and the difficulty of trying to have the two merge together. That is my first question. With respect to the setbacks, one of the clarifications we had and I think it is item, Becky mentioned it a little bit, it is on page 2, it is item 4-1 and there was some language that was taken out. Our understanding initially is when we put this 35 foot buffer zone up here on the front we are agreeable to doing that and certainly it has been approved. with that. Our concern was if there are any setback requirements, those setback requirements are applied to the 35 feet. In other words we don't want to be penalized twice, we are giving up 35 feet of land which will be landscaped owned by a homeowners association. If in the event there is any set back requirements on the lots that adjoin this which is for transcribing 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 16 and 13 those those setback requirements are applied to the landscaped zone along here. Whatever that might be, if there is a 10 foot setback, I am not saying there is, but in the event there is, one of the things we did is we went ahead and put that language on the plat. Staff has asked that be taken off and we would ask that it remain on there because again you have 35 feet here. I think if there are any setbacks that is where they should be applied to and we shouldn't have to be penalized for the additional land. So I don't know if that is clear or not. I can certainly answer questions as I am going through them if you prefer. Another question that I have with respect to sidewalks, we are bonding for sidewalks with ACHD up here along Overland Road. We will be happy to dedicate additional right of way to ACRD approximately 20 feet. Our understanding and the way these are approaching is we will bond for these and at the time that Overland Road is widened and then the curb cut or sidewalk is put in at that point we will put in the curb, gutter and sidewalk. But until that point vfe are bonding. (Inaudible) that is our understanding. There is no sidewalk system through here, it seems again with construction, you always have the possibility of getting things torn up and the difficulty of maintaining it. This phase could be 6 months down the road it could be a year it could be several years down the road we don't quite know. t think that is mainly it, those are my questions with respect to the plat. I think as Becky sa~f we would do the landscap~g for this phase now and then the other phase would trigger at the time we started that phase or (inaudible) Are there any questions? Crookston: Just another comment, I want (inaudible) you say this phase and that phase and you point on your plat would you state where you are actually talking about? C~ Meridian City Council October 15, 1996 Page 13 • Seel: I think again where Becky referred to before the phases that she has referred I would be glad to give you the numbers if you would like. Crookston: It is just to help the record. Seel: Sure, you talk the first phase, again you are talking 23, 22, 1 thru 5, and then the phase 2 will be the remainder of the lots within the plat. Corrie: Any further questions of Jonathan? Rountree: As far as phase 1, you need to include in that a portion of tot 15 for landscaping. You are asking us to consider a consideration or elimination of lot 6 along the Interstate? Seel: Yes that is correct, and as I mentioned, next in line is a CU and I think you will see in there the kind of landscape theme that they are talking about. 1 think it is substantially more than you would have anticipated or expected had this been for example a warehouse facility or something. I think initially we all envisioned in fact that is what it probably would be or something to that extent. I don't think anybody envisioned that there would be a family entertainment center there with the ponds and the decorations and the amount of landscaping and waterworks and stuff that they are going to do. I think it is going to be very attractive the way it is. I think it is overkill to require to have a homeowners association and have another landscape scheme there that really isn't going to match and if anything will make it look worse. Rountree: My question to you is would it be the entire length of or the entire lot 6 that borders lot 5, 7 and 8 in Block 1 or just that portion of lot 6 that borders lot 5? Seel: I think we are agreeable to the fact that it would be lot 5, I think again your intention and we are not trying to skirt that is that for lot 7 you would want to carry that theme through or have something there to buf`er. I don't know how you get around that part of it but if we have to we can certainly keep that within the homeowners association. Morrow: I would make a comment Mr. Mayor, I think Mr. Seel the intent of the homeowners association was so that you saw consistency in terms of landscaping from the freeway side so that it was p~sented in a uniform approach from what is now both phases of the subdivision. Until we hear the other proposal (inaudible) I think we need to think about that as a Council. Seel: I don't disagree with that and like I say I think you should look at it. It is a question of do you bring it up now or do you bring it up at the CU. Our feeling is we want to address it now and again I think from our own feeling was too that you have some assurance that ', . • Meridian City Council October 15, 1996 Page 14 you would have attractive looking landscaping this area. Again I think you are going to have that. I think both points are well taken. Corrie: If I hear you right then you are going to continue that landscaping theme onto Lot 7 and possibly (inaudible): Seel: Well it is going to be difficult to carry this. completely over, so you are not going to see a break because you have a family entertainment center. Mostly what might be here let's say is an office building or some type of incubator space or something like that. So I think where we can, we don't want it to stand out like a sore thumb and all of the sudden you have one stop and you have black and white. But we certainly can't Carry a theme of an entertainment park over and perfectly match it. I think it would be difficult but I guess I would say to you where we can and as much as we can blend one into the other we certainly would. So, again we are trying to address your concern (inaudible). Corrie: Any further questions of Mr. Seel? Thank you, Council questions of staff? Morrow: I would like to hear the staff address the issue with respect to the easement on the plat and then also your comments in terms of the landscaping issue please, Shari or Gary? Stiles: Councilman Morrow, the easement which easement are you talking about? Morrow: Well the easement setback, they want stricken from the plat as I understand condition no. 1 which talks about the setbacks. Stiles: 1 think that the note is, can be misinterpreted by someone and I think that our existing ordinance that is in effect will take care of it. I know Mr. Seel is wanting to make sure that those lots aren't penalized an extra 15 feet for a front setback but really those lots, that will be considered a side setback for them. Also I don't want anyone purchasi-.yg the property thinking they are building right up adjacent to that landscape lot when the irrigation easement is going to be relocated and they will not be able to build on top of it. As far as the landscaping along Overland Road it was always my understanding that Council expected that to be done fully at the first, prior to development. I wasn't aware that they were wanting to just do a piece of it now. The piece that they are talking about now, I don't believe that Nampa Meridian will even allow any trees to be planted in there. If they did allow. it, it would be a vast departure from anything else they have permitted in the City. (End of Tape) that are shown are subject to conditional use permit. I wouldn't see any problem with it if Council approves of the Fiesta Fun Center conditional use permit and the scheme they have shown there they do have encroachment of the development in that 20 foot strip but they do have what appears to be a lot of landscaped area. I wouldn't have Meridian City Council October 15, 1996 Page 15 any particular problem, it does seem very close to the interstate, but if they would just want to take that off so it is not, so it is .only the responsibility of the Fiesta Fun Center and not of the entire development I wouldn't see any problem with that one lot. Morrow: I guess what my question is that obviously for every lot that borders that then you may ultimately see a different proposal. How are you going to develop a theme of consistency that we had originally intended? From my perspective t would like to hear the arguments that would persuade me to change from what it was we had originally intended and the purpose of having an owners association for maintenance of separate lots on both Overland and along the freeway was so that we had consistent landscaping the City only had one entity with which to deal. Now what the proposal that we are hearing is that well we are going to have a conditional use for this parcel, what prohibits all parcels from having a conditional use and then have you not begun to defeat the purpose in having the owners association and common landscape areas. Stiles: With the Fiesta Fun Center I don't think you are going to see any real consistency right next door to it. Morrow: I understand, but we had, our original intent here was that those landscape areas have a common ownership, common theme so that it presented itself in terms of both maintenance and aesthetic look to be pleasing to the City and its citizens. And that you didn't have five lot owners with five different landscape themes and then begin to have the problem from the standpoint of the city's zoning enforcement officer of trying to bring everybody into constant compliance. So I guess what I want to be persuaded of here is that why should we depart from that from the staffs point of view? Stiles: 1 think, the only way you are going to be assured of that is to have a common area. And to have it built up front and maintained consistently. I don't see that as actually happening on this piece even if it were built at one time. I would imagine that each lot owner is going to assume responsibility for the maintenance on that lot just because of the difficulty of getting to that area. Morrow: You are talking about the lot in the corner, lot 5? Stiles: And even the one adjacent to it. You are going to have to be cxossing private property which may or may not have some security issues, fencing, unless they did build it up front and had that set aside as a common area, I don't see how it is going to be consistent. I don't see that it is not going to meet the intent of'the Council to have that just included as part of their landscape theme. When you look at the Fiesta Fun Center and you see what they are proposing I think you will understand how difficult it will be to have that match up with what is going to be right next to it. • • Meridian City Council October 15, 1996 Page 16 Morrow: I guess the issue here is that we have not approved the Fiesta Fun Center we approved in terms of the preliminary plat a common theme. Now we are hearing a reason to change it. I am not persuaded as to why it is we should change that. Because if it stays as a common area you have access the full length of that common lot so that it is accessible from all lots by virtue of it is a common lot. Stiles: How would that access be given? Morrow: If it is a common lot Shari it comes the full length of the development along the, on the freeway and at this juncture, we are not addressing the issue now of some particular use we are addressing the issue of the preliminary plat and as I recall the stipulations of that were that the landscaping along Overland and the landscaping along the freeway be each be lots owned by an owners association and maintained by the association. This is not an issue, from my perspective in terms of the plat I don't think that we ought to be addressing the issue in terms of landscaping for a proposed use. That is what I am after. Thank you Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Gay any comments? Other Councilmen's comments or questions? Seel: (Inaudible) We are not trying, we have CC&R's which address owners association and the maintenance of those common lots. The only one that we are speaking about now and the only one we are asking for is Lot 5 and again I think it comes back to at least my thinking on this which may or may not be right on the mark, but is that I think when we intended this we envisioned this thing as more of a business park. That would be commercial developments. I don't think anyone every envisioned this as a family entertainment center. As you will see and we are not asking this, just making the decision now (inaudible) but I think as you will see it is a very unique landscaping theme. It is not the type of thing you wilt see anywhere else, I think it is apparition. Given that what we are asking for on this part~ular one is if you approve their conditional use permit and you approve the way th~a they are doing their landscaping that the landscaping l~eme be able to be continued all the way to the edge in other words to eliminate that 20 feet. With respect to the rest of the lots for the common area we will call it we are not asking for a change, that will be a consistent thing that is addressed in the CC&R's and we could put in there as we have language that will address, you have the consistency, in other words you are not going to see a hodge podge of different types of landscape throughout it. I think it is just simply with this particular one. I think that Shari is saying, I don't think whateveryouu are going to do you are going to get anything to match this. This is kind of like Disneyland. You are putting Disneyland in the middle of this thing and the other things may not look like it. As much as we can with the lot adjoining it we will try to carry that theme, we are practical. But you have a lot of waterworks and you have a lot of other stuff there that I think is very unique and would be very difficult to do. But at the same time I • Meridian City Council October 15, 1996 Page 17 • think it is going to be a very attractive theme. I think again it is going to accomplish what you are looking for which is to make something very nice looking. Again, we can address it in the CC&R's. With respect to Nampa Meridian I have talked to John Anderson, John Anderson is very comfortable with putting trees in there. We are going to the that, we are going to have 42 inch concrete pipe in there. He is not particularly concerned. Obviously if you were going to come and put in huge trees in there that are going to grow 60 feet he might have a problem. But when I met with him face to face he didn't have a problem with the trees. He said if you want to put in trees you go ahead and do it. We suggested that because again we want to continue that theme of trees all the way through. We don`t want 1200 feet of it being trees and then it all the sudden stops and it goes to just bushes. So we are trying to continue that theme. I think finally what we are asking for on the landscape, when we initially did it again we envisioned this as one phase. We have now come back and really said that the more economic way to do ,this is to do this in two phases. What we are asking for is not to have us have to put in a landscaping along approximately 1200 feet which will be nothing mare than fields for who know's how long. At the time that we put those roads in and we start that infrastructure we would carry that -theme but right now that is no more than a field next to this phase. It will be very difficult to maintain to make it look nice and I think we do it simply in the area that we are building and we have the infrastructure, the roads, the entrance way. I think again that will give you on this particular phase what you are looking for and we will put the second landscape phase in at the time that we start the second phase. But again we don't know when that will be. So we are asking for just some flexibility in terms of that phase. If we were going to initially as we thought develop it and put all the infrastructure and put the first building up we would put the landscaping all the way along. But at this point we are not sure. We are incurring a lot of cost here, having to relocate the Kennedy Lateral and the that and some of the other things. We are trying to keep our cost to something where we can make this economically feasible to us. So that is all we are (inaudible) a little flexibility here. Corrie: Jonathan could you get us a letter from the Nampa Meridian of what they told you? Seel: Absolutely, I will talk to John Anderson when he gets back from hunting. Corrie: Thank you, any further comment or discussion from the Council? Rountree: 1 have a question for Counsel that a lot of these issues are issues that will be dealt with at development agreement is that correct? Crookston: Yes most of them could be. Morrow: I guess as a point of discussion from my perspective is that I don't have a problem with the phasing as long as the specs for each phase in terms of the landscaping along • Meridian City Council October 15, 1996 Page 18 Overland Road are consistent and e~rerybody understands that there will be no deviation from that. I am not personally very happy about having readjustments a# a final plat point without having at some other time to think about it, a second issue. I think that in my mind a third issue is that we separate what may be coming later from what. it is that we originally approved and deal with that in that manner. If we wish to grant a conditional use that alters what it was that we originally approved that is the proper place to do that in my mind. So, with respect to the language talking about the easement and the setbacks I think that can be clarified in the development agnsement. And that seems to me to be a point of clarification. So, those are the four issues as I see them. Rountree: I am still trying to figure out your issue on the landscaping. You are saying that we look at this as it was given to us originally with the landscaping on Overland Road but given the condition of phasing that it would be acceptable to do the landscaping in two phases as long as there is continuous landscaping design and that lot 6 be landscaped. Morrow: What I am indicating Charlie is on Overland Road I don't have a problem with it being done in two phases as long as the plans and specs are consistent in the development agreement reflects that. With respect to the common lot along I-84, I think at this juncture of this final plat is that stays as advertised. If we want to change something with that particular lot on a conditional use permit that is coming through later then that is the point in time to address that issue. Rountree: That is reasonable. Corrie: You will have the same continuity for 7, 8, 9 10, 11, 12 and 13, but the conditional use permit will take care of Lot 6 on that. Morrow: Well if the conditional use permit is granted (inaudible) they have to recognize that they are changing that landscape design for that lot. But I wouldn't see in my mind that ;~ would take it out of the owners association. The owners association would still be responsible but that is an issue to be talked about underneath the conditional use permit in my mind. Rountree: There is another issue that is coming up with these phased in finalized platted projects and that is weed control for those portions that are not developed and I don't know whether we do it as a note on the plat or a condition in the development agreement but developers are going to have to take care of that property. We are having people take 3 and 4 months to get weeds cut and sprayed in some of these areas and 1 don't think that is acceptable.. Morrow: We have a weed ordinance that basically gives them 10 days from time of i Meridian City Council October 15, 1996 Page 19 notification. Rountree: I understand that but we need to get better enforcing that or get some language in here where there are some penalties. I don't know where you handled, it just mentioned that in the development agreement, the ordinance. And quit messing around with it and take care of it and back charge. Morrow: Well that is an issue for the City Attorney to do, we hired a zoning compliance officer to take care of those kinds of issues. Corrie: We could always handle them ourselves if we have to we can have somebody (inaudible) does that for us, but that is right, Walt is correct that is in the ordinance that they zoning ordinance officer would tell them. they have ten days and if they don't do it we do it. So that whole area out there, that second phase out there as Jonathan has will have to be done. Morrow: I guess the issue is that apparently weeds have not (inaudible) Corrie: We could almost hire somebody full time to do it. Morrow: I guess then the issue is Mr. Mayor is that we ought to be giving those folk their notice then on the 11th day we ought to have somebody out there cutting the weeds because the citizens certainly have the right to expect those weeds to be gone given the fact that we have the ordinances and the capability of doing it. Corrie: Does that answer your question Charlie? Rountree: I just wondered if that would be an issue that would be part of a development agreement. Morrow: I don't think it hurts to have a paragraph in there (inaudible). Corrie: Any further discussion? Entertain a motion at this point. Morrow: Mr. Mayor I would move that we approve the final plat for Interstate Center allowing the phasing of Interstate Center development. The landscaping plan must remain consistent with both phases and that along Overland Road and that the development agreement address the issue of the setbacks that were discussed here tonight and that all other conditions of the staff and ACRD and other agencies be complied with. Bentley: Second • Meridian City Council October 15, 1996 Page 20 Corrie: Okay, you have heard the motion made by Mr: Morrow, second by Mr. Bentley for the approval of the final plat of Interstate Center as stated in the motion, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #6: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT CENTER BY SELECT DEVELOPMENT AND CONTRACTING INC.: Corrie: Would a representative from the entertainment center come up please? Bowcutt: Becky Bowcutt, I am representing the applicant Select Development in this matter. Jut to give you a quick run down on this project they are proposing a family entertainment facility. It is on approximately 6.5 acres abuts I-84, this is Mountain View Equipment. They are proposing a 14,400 square foot building. That building will have like family arcade, it will also have a snack bar facility and the ofFces assoaated with the facility will be in this building. They will have a 1500 square foot maintenance shop that will be for maintenance of their little go carts and their grounds, their ponds and so forth, that will be used so they will have all of their equipment and stuff stored in that shop. They are proposing a 7 stall batting cage, they have little kiddie bumper cars, kiddie electric cars, and then they have this go cart facility that adjoins the interstate. The question was asked when we went before the Planning and Zoning Commission on the noise generated by this facility, we did submit some documentation on what the decibel level would be. These are little honda engines and you are going to get far more engine noise from Interstate 84 than you will ever get-from this little go cart track. They are also proposing a bumper boat pond, they are a gunnite construction. The water is recycled through the system, they chlorinate the water and then these ponds run here and the miniature golf area. There is, as you can see there is a lot of landscaping and trees and we did provide a detailed landscape plan basically stipulating all of the tree varieties. In my opinion we could duplicate the tree varieties on the next ut to get a consistent or a tie in so we have that corridor and you have a consistent look along 1-84. This particular area that they have on their plan designated as future is just going to be turfed ~ this time they vviN have picnic tables to provide an area for birthday parties or any special little events that they have. They constructed many of these facilities throughout the US, this company is out of St. George, Utah. They brought in some colored photographs of the previous sites that they have- done, I did submit those with the conditional use application, I don't know if the Council has seen those pictures. I took some photocopies of the pictures it really doesn't do it justice. As you can see it is well manicured, everything appears to be (inaudible) a lot of rocks that are made with gunnite and they incorporate trees, grass and pond areas. The gentlemen that are developing this project one of them is going to be moving to the Meridian area on a permanent basis, he will live here and do business out of the City of MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 15 1996 APPLICANT: W.H. MOORE COMPANY ITEM NUMBER; 5 REQUEST• FINAL PLAT FOR INTERSTATE CENTER AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS "REVIEWED" ~J~,,,,, Q SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS P ' ' ry ~" '~ t/" 1~" ~. SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS OTHER: III Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. WILLIAM G. BF_RG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 ROBERT D. CORRIE Mayor MEMORANDUM: To: Mayor, City Council From: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer Shari Stiles, P&Z Administrator Re: INTERSTATE CENTER (Final Plat - By W.H. Moore Co.) COUNCIL MEMBERS WALT W. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M. ROUNTREE GLENN R. BENTLEY P & Z COMMISSION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman TIM HEPPER JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND MALCOLM MACCOY October 10, 1996 We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, for your information and consideration as conditions of the Applicant during the hearing process: 1. Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project, shall be tiled per City Ordinance 11-9-605.M. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Determine the seasonal high groundwater elevation, and submit a profile of the subsurface soil conditions, as prepared by a soil scientist, with street development plans. 4. Submit copy of proposed restrictive covenants and/or deed restrictions for review by the Meridian City Attorney. 5. Provide a statement as to whether the pressurized irrigation system in this development is to be owned and maintained by the Irrigation Dist. or the Lot Owners Assoc. C:\OFFICE\WP W IN\C}ENERAL\INTRSTAT. C-C Mayor and City Council October 10, 1996 Page Two 6. Indicate any FEMA Flood Plains affecting the area being platted, and detail plans for reducing or eliminating the boundary. 7. Application needs the following corrections: Pam -Item 6. Subdivision is within the City limits. Narrative is not needed. Item 7. Plat does border a potential greenbelt. Item 8. Sewer easement is not a recreational easement. Item 10. There are proposed dedications of common area to the owner's association for landscaping. Item 15.e. Landscape plan submitted for review and approval needs to be updated. It does not appear the plan submitted will be accepted by Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District for construction over their easement. This landscape plan must be approved and bonding provided for the improvements prior to signature on the final plat. Provide evidence from Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District's approval prior to submittal to the City. Page 3 - Item 15.f. Trees will be provided for prior to occupancy on any lot, not at the time of development of lots on Overland Road. Item 15.i. Setback requirements will be reviewed closely due to the shared driveway accesses along Overland Road and existing utility and irrigation easements. Statement of Compliance -Item 7 -Drawings for sidewalk improvements and Kennedy Lateral relocation were not attached. 7. Please address, in writing, each of the General and Site Specific Comments within this memorandum to the City Clerk's office prior to October 15, 1996. c:~o~c~~wrwn~nc~cx~wuvrrrRS~rnr.c-c Mayor and City Council October 10, 1996 Page Three SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS 1. This final plat generally conforms to the approved preliminary plat. 2. Please submit a copy of the Ada County Street Name Committee's approval letter for the Subdivision name, lot and block numbering, and street names. Make any corrections necessary to conform. A private street name needs to be provided. 3. Please provide the Public Works Department with documentation from the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District that the existing Kennedy Lateral easement has been vacated, that they approve the piping plan, and will accept the new proposed easement location. The development plans delivered to the Public Works Department on September 16, 1996, do not show that the Kennedy Lateral is to be piped. The requirement to pipe this lateral has not been waved, nor has a variance from the Ordinance been applied for. Briggs Engineering's written response to staff comments to the Planning and Zoning Commission indicate that preliminarily the pipe size would need to be 36" diameter. 4. Please add or revise the following notes: (1.) Delete the last sentence of this paragraph. Present City Ordinance regarding setbacks is adequate to accommodate this. The language shown could be misconstrued by potential buyers as relates to encroachment of easements. (5.) ...and along new private road right-of-way,... (12.) The owner of each lot across which passes anirrigation/drainage ditch or pipe, is responsible for the maintenance thereof unless such responsibility is assumed by an irrigation/drainage district. 5. How and where is the dedication of the vision triangle, mentioned in note number 7, going to be traced out on the ground? Should the triangle be shown graphically on the corners that are affected? 6. Fill in the CP&F record number for the southwest 1 /4 corner, and doesn't the 1 / 16th comer shown also have a CP&F record number? C:IOFFICE\W PW IN\OENHRALUNTRSTAT. C-C Mayor and City Council October 10, 1996 Page Four ~~ 7. Developer shall provide the City of Meridian Building Department with compaction testing results across any lots receiving fill material during the development process. 8. Break down the 1037.17' distance shown between the intersections of the private roads with Overland Road, so that the distances tie in the 1 / 16th corner. 9. Provide a letter from the Ada County Highway District approving the four access points shown onto Overland Road. 10. What is the purpose of the dashed line, same line type as Kennedy Lateral Easement Line, that is shown running parallel and 25 feet north of the centerline of Overland Road? I assume that it is the edge of the existing right-of-way. If the line has to be shown, change the line type. 11. Correct the distance shown on the east boundary of Lot 11, Block 1. It looks like it should be about 290.92' instead of 310.91'. The 134.62' distance shown on the north boundary of Lot 10, Block 1, doesn't match the distance shown for the same line in the legal description of the Certificate of Owners. 12. When there are easements that exist on a piece of property prior to subdivision, those easements have to be shown along with enough information that ties the easement down to the new platted lots. There should be enough information provided on the plat that the new lot owners that are affected by said easements can easily establish the easement lines without having to survey their newly platted lot. Specifically, this refers to the existing sanitary sewer easement along the northerly boundary and the easement for the existing irrigation pipeline crossing the subdivision. 13. Bonding for, or construction of, the common area will be required prior to signature on the final plat. 14. There is an extra subdivision boundary pin shown adjacent to the northwest comer of Lot 8, Block 1 along the I-84 right-of--way. C: \OFFICE\ W PW IN\(}EI~ERAI,UNf RSTAT, C-C Mayor and City Council October 10, 1996 Page Five • 15. The development plans submitted to the Public Works Department on September 16, 1996, don't indicate that the project is going to be built in phases, nor were there any plans for the private streets with drainage details. There is a 500-year flood plain across the northeast corner of this development. The location of the flood plain needs to be shown on the plat map with a note that advises prospective lot owners of the conditions of building within a flood plain. If you propose to remove this development from the flood plain, detailed plans of how it will be accomplished will have to be submitted for review. 16. Five-foot-wide sidewalks are required throughout the development in accordance with City Ordinance. Deposit into the Ada County Highway District Trust Fund is not acceptable. 17. Correct spelling of supplying in sanitary restrictions note. 18. A development agreement is required as a condition of annexation. This development agreement must be approved by the City Council and recorded prior to signature on the final plat. C:10FFICE\W P W AI\GENERAL\INTRSTAT, GC WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administratflr PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney • COUNCIL MEMBERS HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live WALT W. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CITY OF MERIDIAN E GLENN R. BENTLEY 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 P R 2 COMMISSION Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Public WorksBuilding Deparlinent (208) 887-2211 TIM HEPPER Motor Vi3hicle/Drivers Liceffie (208) 888-4443 JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND ROBERT D. CORRIE MALCOLM MACCOY Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 8, 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/26/96 HEARING DATE: 10/15 /96 REQUEST: Final Plat for Interstate Center BY: W.H. Moore Com any LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Overland Road, South of I-84 Interchange JIM JOHNSON, P2 MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P2 GREG OSLUND, P2 KEITH BORUP, P2 ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C GLENN BENTLEY, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTN~ENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8r FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8r FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8 FlNAL PLAT) CITY FILES ~ ~ ~ j~V ~~ru~e. YOUR CONCISE RECE~~E~ ocr - ~ js~s CITY OF ~FRI~IA,~ HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., Ciiy Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P 8 Z Administretpr PATNA. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 Motor Vbhicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 ROBERT D. CORRIE Mayor COUNCIL MEMBERS WALT W. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M. ROUNTREE GLENN R. BENTLEY P & Z COMMISSION JIM JOHNSON, Chalnnan TIM HEPPER JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND MALCOLM MACCOY TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 8, 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/26/96 HEARING DATE: 10/15 /96 REQUEST: Final Plat for Interstate Center BY: W.H. Moore Comgany LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Overland Road. South of 1-84 Interchange JIM JOHNSON, P2 MALCOLM MACCOY, P2 JIM SHEARER, P/Z GREG OSLUND, P2 KEITH BORUP, P2 ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C GLENN BENTLEY, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT ~iFIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT] INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES ~ _ ~ O , q /„ OTHER: ! (~/ YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ,~ ~P~~ ~o r (,~ A- f.~,. ~/o~-t~ ~c~ cc; ~e,E ~I~,,~T S p w c~4/JaZ o s w;~c. N~~ V a (!~ ~e1 ~ w ~" ° O 'h9 o p''~° ~ ~ O w ~ ~ EE, o ~ Z ~,~i"J ~ ''c~ 2 ~ ~', ~E°. Z c i! ,~„ ~ ~ o. ~ Z ~ m c^ai• E eye n ~' A ~ R• ~, 2 p' ~' ~"~ o' O [i7 y N ~ T c3 -• ~ °'. 25 '"' ~ ~I ~ ~ rn o » N• n ~ o.~e ~ o 'o ~ O .ors ff Y m a ... ~ n y O 5 rto ~~' Oi 'O N a O O ^-h ~ p p a 0 N A b 'T1 a O 3? °~~.~ 70 ~m gyp a~ m ~ o ~.c~ ~ ~~ ~'R Z orao~,5 ~ ~> ~'$~3 ~n o~ 9~.b ~ n DoE HE.f 3~ aa£ $ a .~ ~,c~ m ~'S yy E... r H:~ .o co° '"~ >0 Qb3 3A"a n ^y ~g x 'O 3.~ o. y ^.~ O S yy ~ o. ~. ~ y Ri c ~, w .o g ~o a a c3 ~= Z 4 F ~ °,~ ~ d ~'' ~ ~•y ~ ~ n _a~ ~ ~°~°, ~. ~ "•° o ?' ~ to ~ ~ p~~ /w~~OH eEo ~ ~o - ~ o o ~ a o coi•~ay co Z °' $ E E 7~ = J~: ~ .S ° m ~ .'may. ~,~ ° n' N ~ C n ~ F. G ~ V1 E y ~ _. q~ y~<o A °e °~c O•.,n n.a~ g~•a&', eD c w ~'c 3~ cw~~° C ~.~+ =tea; gc :;mom ids c co a 'v~• & ~'~w ~ yp otc~ °~ ~eroa. y .d c"o co ~ ~ ;;~ `•" e ~ ~O* ~ fie. £'°~ Q ~ y ~.•°a o ~e v_ 'o ~ a 7 S S ~ a ~ mrJ ayr,,. E .,, o o: a E y~ '~ c y ~ y Q~ Z N O LJ'. S p 0 ~ y~ ~ y g c. E c:i ~ w a• ~ N f0 n , ..~ ~ a 3 B N p, id ~.U ~5~c ~ ~~ c~~ ec ~~.e c~ c o ~ ac g a ~ ~ aao v`D 5 ~ S °' ~ o0 h~ 3~ E E r gE. ~+coa °^+ _ y q° °O^axa Z ya ;E~ v~ ~~ E~ '~ c~u ° ~~ 9 ~: o ~ ^ ~ ~ °. ~ ~ E y 'o' 8. `~o ao N m~ w c S 3 E o$ Z•< `c' a y a~ R c H E w E ~$ $ o = ars ~i~{y ~, n T~ ~~ ~ ~ ? a 9 ~,5 ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 5. p y O. ~ C .Ca '~ ~ ^• ~• O ie .a•. H• N y N E ~E ~• '$ oc ~" ~~ oo N w _ a N N ~ ~w i~H o. am cn rt tt E n ~C O ~' W W cA (D rl' ~ r Y F ~ • ~C ( D ~ 1 V y h-( ~ y 1~ ' 1 / ~"'~ N _ ~ UI f r N • I-h Ct ~°, ~ ~ ~~ rt ' I--' N ~ fA :3 a ~ N ~ ~ (P °: ~-~ro o~ ~~ ~ n .,? ~i fi ~ ~C ~ rt ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ [n ~ .~' ~ ' O ~ Fi / ~ ~ I••'• F•'• 1V t"tl ~, C m • m ~ a w ~ R DG ~i ~2 ti F f D -' ~ F '- K a / ~ ~ / ~ 1 V Y~ ~• / ~ Y~ ~••~ ~ ~t fi N• 0 0 > ~ ^~ ~ N ~+ N _ ~~JA~N.1OOe pr.A ~Ur A U J U W W _ N^'~00o J W O N O 9 JUppw W" 0 O OD 0 0~ O ~ _ ••~~p~p ~1~ pyD~ pp C a: i x x x x :' ~p0000000 O p p C C C O C 0000 p .p p C 8 OOOOOJ 99 +n ~p"~UW N~-0~O 00 a i a a 2 2 a se~~QNQ:~~AWNN JO~UA NWAV WWNN•-•~^ vNNOOJ5~ _N `+ $25~$~$~$ ~~~$ $$$$25~ s~ $ ~9 9 m 0 J G~. ~ T py _9 ~ QQQ &.~N w p UAWN~O~00 l '~ ~~OJO~UUUU• J~O `+W OQQ~ OxOUC 55~~ JNOO U yy~~yy~~ ~ f ~~~~$$$$g$$$$$25g$ ~25$g $$ 2525g ay ~ ~ pp ~~pp ~ewpe pp N-.~pW pp.JO~` Wpp J8Q ppOpp~~Uppp •OpUppD.. W88 Jpp pN .pJ.ppp § ~ NN Wp by .xpp~"p' ~Ap Upp pNp~~pD pJpO ~ +~ $$$ 25 p250000000 ~ $ 0000 00000 C r pp~~ pp~~ ~~C N•w N Ui~~ J w ~ T O t t ~i~ ~ A A b o i n w o O . J O ~ AO AO .. ~A g pp p A p . pp ppp~~p o pp ~pp pp ppQ p Qp~~8 p p p p p O O O ~ ~ ~ pp pp pp B O O O O pp p p p 8 0 0 0 S } O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ OQeJJJSJ~O. Q~Ox SO~~UUUtSn~AAAQA 0$0250$0250$0250$025 WWWSW5~~ x$025 NNNSN5~~~~- 0$'0'250$ Y ~~ ~9 ~~ 25 A W N ~ ~ ~ 0 x a m O ~' m ~ ~ ~ ~R' v ~mm~ <<' o ~ m ~ ~ -zXm ~ c -I (') N D ~ C W ~ O Z v ~ W C ~ ~ Z 2 ~ o m O m y °• e.a ~ C N ~ ~ ep eT, E ~ •+ ^ .~ Y ~ c. A Z A ~ ~ 0 5' ~ ~ ~~ 7 0 ~ ~ ~ ~•o _ °•~ 7 $ ~ Z ' ~ ~ m ~.~ a o ro O y a c n° ~ m R °~a• = O S . p 3f~ ~ A ~' C ~ ~~ n $ a ° U'g~ C' J a ~ O ~ '-.1 Cam . E m ado 43 7 O F tea! ~ .q ~ ~ U 0.. ~ ~ ;• h ~ ~ .. . 3 y ~_ = ~• v ~'o a - - F ~ ~i C p y e/ 7 ~e °° ~ ,~ '.1 25 ~ a a? ~o ~ E 6 Q ~ ~ ~ Ci '• j pE ~8 CO ~E T D • • SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET CEIVED AU6 2 ~ ~~ CiTti' OAF ~IE~I.DIAN Proposed Development Name INTERSTATE CENTER SUBDIVISION City MERIDIAN Date Reviewed 8/8/96 Preliminary Stage Final XxXXX~ Engineer/Developer Briggs Enter / ~~~ The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Meridian City Street Name Ordinance. The following_existing street names shall aogear on the Dlat as' '"JVEST OVERLAND ROAD" "INTERSTATE 84" "SOUTH MERIDIAN ROAD STATE HIGHWAY 69" Please choose 2 of following Droposed street names for use in this develooment' "KING SALMON" "BLACK MARLIN" "BLUE MARLIN" - "GOLDEN TROUT" The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA C®UNTY STREET NAME Ada County Engineer John Priester Ada Planning Assoc. Terri Raynor City of Meridian Representative Meridian Fire District Re 'ATIVES OR DESIGNEES Date ZL Date ~ ~~" ~ Date z L Date ~"L 3 - 9 SO NOTE: A copy of thisevaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed !!!! Sub Index Street Index 3N 1 W_13 Section NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS k zL QG CENTRAL CEN •• DISTRICT ~iRHEALTH DEPARTMENT DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTI°~NT Environmental Health Division Return to: Rezone # Conditional Use # Preliminary /Final /Short Plat ~a~ ~-rs'~~n= ~~~`'~~ Sc~/~cQrJ',S l orb ^ Boise ^ Eagle ^ Garden city ~-Meridian ^ Kuna ^ Acz ~-~~ ^ I. We have No Objections to this Proposal. ~, n~ 0 :. T - 3 ~;..~5 ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. t.~~~ a'~ ~~~~~ ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. We can Approve this Proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: ^ 2 feet ^ 4 feet ^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. $~ 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines central water ^ 10. Street Runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ I I. Stormwater disposal systems shall be reviewed by relative to: ^ Waste Disposal ^ Injection Well rules. ^ Groundwater Protection ^ 12. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ 13. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 14. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store ~~ 15. Date: ~ ~ l 1 r° c ~j r~i2~I L~i-~7z /1j~7/,gti~jy~7,lT ~'1~3~y/ w /S Reviewed By: j Review Sheet CDND 10/91 rcb, rev. I/9S i:~~~ C~fNTRAL • • DISTRICT (! ". T - ~ ~~:'J~ DEPARTMENT ~~ ~ pnoent and treat dt'case and dts~~r. to promote healthy l~jestyles; artd to p~ and p~0~ the health and qudtgl ol~ STORMWATER MANAGEMENT RECOMN~NDATIONS We recommend that the first one half inch of stormwater be pretreated through a grassy swahe prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater awd surface water duality. The engineers and architects involved with the design of this project should obtain current best management practices for stlrmwater disposal and design a stormwater management system t thaws Uep used groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals tha guidance are: ,1) GUIDELINES FOR TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF STuOhRMW Idaho RUN OFF. Idaho Division of Environmental Quality, So Regional Office, September 1995. 2) STORMWA~R MANAGEMENT bIANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND, State of Washington Department of Ecology, February 1992 3) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER AND SITE DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT. Voiley, Ebnore. Boise, and Adn Cowtetes Ado / IeM Cash Crn MfIC loin • Yvon 70f K ~+0 a ieoe Aooens bar. O. 63701 Ooc~. 0. 63IOS PR 73433SS Enrira IMo*t 327•)199 .0 . r~ a Maid 7 2 1 famM Pbrlr~ ]?7.1100 ~~ ~( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 61moA C,aNr Dan SZO E be+StiM K Mouiloin Ibnr. D. 67017 R- S61.1~1 ema• ca•d1r ow d ~rnlerollNoMi too S Ie+ 9r•~t E MaNO~n Fbrtr. O. X011 PR 561-0225 ,ratwc~-~0' P.Q baz ~ ~•0.~ ~ y1.7191 RECEIVED OCT - 7 1996 Ci1'Y OF MLRiD1AN 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-888-6201 Phones: Area Code 208 3 October 1996 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Boise 343-1884 Attn: Wi// Berg, C%ty C/erlC SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 City of Meridian Boise 345-2431 33 East /daho Meridian, lD 83642 RE: Final P/at for /nterstate Center Nampa & Meridian lrrigation District's Kennedy Lateral courses along the south boundary of the project. The right-of--way of the Kennedy Lateral is 55 ft; 35 feet feet to the right and 20 feet to the left of center each way facing downstream. See /daho Code 42-1208--R/GHTS-OF-WA Y NOT SUBJECT TO ADVERSE POSSESS/ON. The developer must contact John P. Anderson or Bill Henson at either 466-0663 or 345-2431 for approva/before any encroachment or change ofright-of--way occurs. Nampa & Meridian lrrigation District requires a Land Use Change/Site Development application be filed for review prior to final platting. All latera/s and waste ways must be protected. All municipa/surface drainage must be retained on site. if any surface drainage leaves the site, Nampa & Meridian lrrigation District must review drainage p/ans. Contact Donna Moore at 343-1884 or 466-7861 for further information. The deve%per must comply with /daho Code 31-3805. It is recommended that irrigation water be made availab/e to al/ deve/opments within Nampa & Meridian lrrigation District. ~ Sincerely, ~~ B~ enson, Asst. Water Superintendent NAMPA & MER/D/AN lRR/GATION DISTR/CT BH: d/n pc: File Water Superintendent Asst. Secretary-Treasurer APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 RECEIVED OCi - 7 ~ggg qT1' OF-fER(p1AN rhea & ~l e~udta.~ `Iv~tgat~oo~ 2~td~rtct 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-888-6201 4 October 19 9 6 Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Stan McHutchison Boise 343-1884 Briggs Engineering, IriC. SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Boise 345-2431 1111 S. Orchard, Ste. 600 Boise, ID 83705 RE: Land Use Change Application for INTERSTATE CENTER Dear Stan: Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to file with the Irrigation District for its review on the above- referenced development. Also enclosed is a developer packet with information concerning pressure urban irrigation and local improvement districts. If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call on Donna Moore at the District's office or John Anderson, the District's Water Superintendent at the District's shop. Sincerely, DAREN R. COON, SECRETARY/TREASURER NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT DRC/dnm cc: File Water Superintendent W. H. Moore Company City of Meridian enc. APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS • 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 OCT-15-1996 15 54 FROM • October 15, 1996 Meridian City Council 33 ]East Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Interstate Center ~NGINEER/NG ~RI~GiS f N G. F., , This letter is in regards to the General and Site Specific comments on the Interstate Center final plat and plans. General Comments The Kennedy Lateral is located on the southern portion of the property. W.H. Moore Company will pipe the facility. Plans have been submitted to Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District and City Engineer for review. 2. I have no knowledge of a well or septic system on the property. However, the applicant will comply with City Ordinance 5-~-5I 7 if these facilities are found. 3. A geotechnieal firm will be retained to provide information on groundwater levels. 4. A copy of the restrictive covenants were submitted to the Planning Department for review. 5. The developer will provide a pressurized irrigation system for the Interstate project in compliance with the City of Meridian Ordinance. The system will be owned and maintained by Nampa-Meridian irrigation District. 6. FEMA information has been added to the final plat. The developer has no plans to modify the IFIEMA boundaries. 7. (Item #6) Subdivision is within City limits of Meridian. (Item #7) Ten Mile Creek abuts a portion of the property's north boundary; however, a greenbelt for pedestrian or bicycle traffic cannot be established because the creek turns north and goes under Interstate 84. The creek is also cut off by the Kuna-Meridian Road overpass. Access to a greenbelt cannot be accomplished on ±he east or west end of the property. I am confused about the staff's comments on the greenbelt item. (Item #8) The Ten Mile Creek has an existing Bureau of Reclamation easement and a Meridian Sewer easement runs parallel with the Ten Mile Creek easement. (Item #10) The common lots delineated on the final plat will be owned and maintained by the lot owners' association. (Item #l~e) A revised landscape plan was submitted to the Meridian Planning Department and Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District. The Irrigation Districts' previous comments were incorporated into the plan. (item #15f) The developer proposes to construct Interstate Center in two phases. The landscape construction will be triggered by the first developed in each respective phase.. 950615/council.ltr 1111 S. Orchard, Suite 600 • Boise, Idaho 83705 • (208) 3449700 Fax# (208) 345-2950 OCT 15 '96 15 59 PAGE.01 OCT-15-1996 15=54 FROM BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. 1111 S. Orchard, suite soo • Boise, Idaho 83705 • (208) 3x5.2881 FAX # (208) 345-2950 (Item #5) Understood. (Item #7 (Statement of C;ompliance)) Construction plans for sidewalk improvements along Overland Road and the internal streets was provided by Rick Clinton. The construction plans for piping of the Kennedy lateral were provided by Rick Clinton. Site Specific Comments Post-It'"brand fax t~a~mitPaPme~76T1 ~ of pagos t moo. ~ ~ 950615/council.ltr 1 Lp ~~~ P~` P,~ pct q -~ ~ 0 1. Understood. 2. Street Name Evaluation sheet attached. 3. The project engineer is working with the Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District to relinquish the existing easement and provide a replacement easement consistent with the piping and relocation of the Kennedy Lateral. 4. Note l :Applicant would like to discuss the wording of this note with the City. Note 5: Revised on plat. Note 12: Added sentence to plat. 5. ~/ision Triangle added to face of plat. 6. Revised CP&F numbers and eliminated unnecessary numbers. 7. Understood. 8. Revised on plat. 9. ACID staff report attached. 10. Revised on plat. 11. Revised on plat. 12. Understood. 13. Understood. 14. Revised on plat. 15. I met with Rick Clinton on 10/10/96 and designated the (2) two construction phases. The flood plain has been delineated on the final plax. 16. Five foot sidewalks will be provided on both sides of the interior private streets and along the north side of Overland Road abutting the subject parcel. l7. Revised on plat. 18. A development agreement has been submitted to the Meridian Planning Department. Sincerely, BRCGG ENGINEERING, iNC. Becky Bowcutt band Use Planner OCT 15 '96 15.59 TOTAL P.02 PAGE.02 /., RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANIES Reliance Insurance Company Philadelphia, Pennsylvania United Pacific Insurance Company Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Reliance Surety Company Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Bond No. U 273 08 96 SURETY BOND KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: That we, WINSTON H. MOORE as Principal(s), and UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania Corporation authorized to transact surety business in the State of Idaho, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF MERIDIAN as Obligee, in the penal sum of SEVENTY-TWO THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED TEN AND NO/100'S----- (572,210.00 DOLLARS, lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the above-bounded,Winston H: Moore, has filed with the CITY OF MERIDIAN a plat for INTERSTATE CENTER which requires improvements as follows: LANDSCAPING, FENCING, PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION, AND STREET LIGHTS. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That if the said Principal(s) shall comply with all applicable Ordinances, Rules and Regulations, and any Amendments thereto, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, That the aggregate liability of the Surety hereunder for any and all claims presented shall not exceed the penal sum of this bond. PROVIDED, FURTHER, HOWEVER, That this bond shall continue in force until canceled by Surety giving 30 days written notice to Obligee and Principal of its intention to terminate its liability hereunder. SIGNED AND SEALED this 29TH day of MAY 19 97 ~~,~~~ ~~ t ~Y 2 ~ ~" 7 _.. - ~'~ .. _ _.. __ ,E SURETY COMPANY ,, PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEbINITY COMPANY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Del- aware, and that RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY and UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, are corporations duly organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and that RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY is a corporation duty organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin (herein collectively called "the Companies") and that the Companies by virtue of signature and seals do hereby make, constitute and appoint Terry S. Robb, John Kersch, Carol M. Crosswhite, of Boise, Idaho their true and lawful Attorneylsl-in-Fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver for and on their behalf, and as their act and deed any and all bonds and undertakings of suretyship and to bind the Companies thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof were signed by an Executive Officer of the Companies and sealed and attested by one other of such officers, and hereby ratifies and confirms all that their said Attorneylsl-in-Fact may do in pursuance hereof. This Power of Attorney is granted under and by the authority of Article VII of the By-Laws of RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY, RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, and RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY which provisions are now in full force and effect, reading as follows: ARTICLE VII -EXECUTION OF BONDS AND UNDERTAKINGS 1. The Board of Directors, the President, the Chairman of the Board, any Senior Vice President, any Vice President or Assistant Vice President or other officer designated by the Board of Directors shall have power and authority to (al appoint Attorneylsl-in•Fact and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company, bonds and undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and Ibl to remove any such Attorneylsl-in-Fact at any time and revoke the power and authority given to [hem. 2. Attorneyls)-in-Fact shall have power and authority, subject to the terms and limitations of the Power of Attorney issued to them, to execute deliver on behalf of the Company, bonds and undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof. The corporate seal is not necessary for the validity of any bonds and undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof. 3. Attorney(s)-in-Fact shall have power and authority to execute affidavits required to be attached to bonds, recognizances, contracts of indemnity or other conditional or obligatory undertakings and they shall also have power and authority to certify the financial statement of the Company and to copies of the Bylaws of [he Company or any article or section therecf. This Power of Attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the Executive and Finance Committees of the Boards of Directors of Reliance Insurance Company. United Pacific Insurance Company and Reliance National Indemnity Company by Unanimous Consent dated as of February 28, 1994 and by the Executive and Financial Committee of the Board of Directors of Reliance Surety Company by Unanimous Consent dated as of March 31, 1994. 'Resolved that the signatures of such directors and officers. and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or any certificates relating thereto by ~~ facsimile and any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any such Power so executed and certified by facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company, in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached.' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused these presents to be signed and their corporate seals to be hereto affixed, this July 19, 1996. p ,y RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY ytd.or~^ a ~~~C~ ~ ~ ~ r°~+ RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY 3 ° • ± o*~°~+ ' .~'°V.: UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY %- uAL ~ t `~UL• ~ ~ °SEaI'' ~ RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY nr ~ us• t F `fir! ., ~ sy~yif f .y y~ry~'r- STATE OF Washington } COUNTY OF King } ss. On this, July 19, 1996, before me, Janet Blankley, personally appeared Mark W. Alsup, who acknowledged himself to be the Vice President of the Reliance Surety Company, and the Vice President of Reliance Insurance Company, United Pacific Insurance Company, and Reliance National Indemnity Company and that as such, being authorized to do so, execu the foregoing instrument for the purpose therein contained by signing the name of the corporation by himself as its duly authorized officer B In witness whereof, I hereunto set my hand and official seal. ~~+~~~~ ~<~ ° NOTARY 'r < -'1 • E PUBLIC .f 'J'r t2-ts-9~ c~ 9~p~WAS~~Nr'~ Notary P lic in and for the State of Washingto Residing at Puyallup I, Robyn Layng, Assistant Secretary of RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY, RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE C MP- ANY, and RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the Power of Attorney executed by said Companies, which is still in full force and effect. y 97 29~h Ix 19 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seals of said Companies this day of •lAw~~ ~~ ,~w~ ~ ~ ~ Assistant Secretary ~~ k ~:;~~ ~ g ~r ~dz~~ G~f ~ ~, ~, ~S. ~~ ~~1. ~~ ~~ t ~ ~. r~ .~ ~~~~~~ ~.. LETTER CAF BRIGGS ENGINEERING, Inc. 1111 So. Orchard St., Suite 600 Boise, Idaho 83705 PHONE: (208) 345-2881 FAX N0: (208) 345-2950 TRANSMITTAL DATE ~ ~ ~ 7 ID N0. ~~ ~ ~ ~~ JOB NAME ~'''y''~t~-1 ~1q'T.~ .'.,~.F.~/VV~''b~-+° JOB ADDRESS ,f' ~ ~ ,i~,/ , r' ~ ' a' :. ; qTY, STATE ~~ WE ARE SENDING YOU a WE ARE RETURNING ^ SHOP DRAW/NGS ^ CHANGE ORDER ^ COPY OF LETTER ^ PLANS ^ Off?/G/NAL S FINAL PLA T ^ SPEC/F/CA T/ONS ^ COMPUTER D/SK ^ OTHER ^ ENCLOSED ^ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA ^ FEDERAL EXPRESS L~''C~URIER COPIES DATED ID N0. DESCRIPTION tl i'ns`/ /~- mod/! 1~ '7~ /~'=,~'' ~"G ~.c- ?.~ $:, _ ,< ~ , .~ •.~~ ',~., .. . THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW ^ FOR.APPRO~AL ^ APPROI~ED AS SY/BM/TIED ^ RESYJBM/T GbP/ES FOR APPROVAL ^ FOR YtxIR /NFORMAI/ON ^ APRROVID AS NOIID ^ S7IBA!/T COP/ES FOR D/SIR/Bl/1ION ~ S RElX/ESTED ^ RETURNED fOIP CA~PRECTIONS ^ RETURN GYh+PREC7ED PR/N1S ^ FOR RENEW AND CD,NMENT ^ PRK;E ^ FOR B/DS DUE ^ REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED A ~ WEST~R~i DfIJi/ERl( SERVICE . R 8423 AW3NGTON DR E BOISE, $3709 R ~ 377-0?'~ DATE v"~ ?_ I ~ SHIPPERS Nn e~ ~ ~ SHIPPER- ~ CONSIGNEE ~: .,...y ~~ _, ~ ~ .,.~ t i f ~~~ ORIGIN: DESTINATION! %~:'i' ~~ ~~ r~.~ y, ~~ ~~` L L !t •G, % QUANTITY DESCRIPTIO N WEiG~t'I`°' '~~ii4TE , . ,:P~EI'~tat3 _ =°GOLLECT "; _.. r f e 1~ t~ RE VED GO ~' ONDITI EXCEPT AS NOTED .AMOUNT $ C ME T _ ~YJ GATE SHIPPEf~51GN 1 ATU RE SU BJECr TO SEC SON) OF~-L T' DRIVERS SIGNATURE 3-l/FiIISINHLr tlliMl 61LL :-.` _.' PAYMENT WIT IN 7 DAYS REQUIRED BY REGULATIONS P.U.C. & I.C.C. REGULATIONS REQUIFfE / ORIGINAL BBL 621.5 interoffice M~iY 1 a ~9~7 CITY OI~ ~f~~~lO~Ai ~E~~~~~0[~L~~ ~ to: Will Berg, ]r. -City Clerk cc: File /Becky Bowcutt (Briggs Engineering, Inc.) from: Gary D. Smith, PE re: Interstate Center Subdivision -Final Plat Mylars date: May 13, 1997 Will: Here is a vellum sheet no. l ,with some red-line comments, and a mylar sheet no.2 for this final plat. I have affixed my seal and signature in the space provided subject to the engineer malting a couple of corxections/revisions. 1. Show a detail of how the location of Lot 8, Bloclc 1 affects the existing city sanitary sewer line easement. How this affects our easement needs to be approved by us. 2. Revise the irrigation easement call-outs on Lots 7 ~ 11, Bloclc 1 to just a generic irrigation easements. Attached is a copy of a letter written to Bruce F. concerning the proposed bond azxlounts for landscaping, street lights, irrigation system, and fencing. I have talked to Becky Bowcutt and asked her to fax me a copy of a bid for each of the items, excepting the street lights, so that you can verify the proposed amounts for bond. I don't have any information iz1 my file concerning Wayne Croolcston's approval of the development agreement, the non-development agreement and the CC&R's. These were all approved by the Council with the stipulation that they be approved by Wavne. from the desk of... We also need a copy of the contract agreement Gary D. Smith, PE Public Works Director between the developer and NMID for the City of Meridian operation and maintenance of the pressurized 33 E. Idaho irrigation system. Meridian, Idaho 83642 208-881-221 I Regards, Gary. ~ fax:208-881-1291 or 208-887-4813 March 13, 1997 Mr. Bruce Freckleton Building Department City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Interstate Center Dear Bruce: ~N~,INEER/NG BRIGGS ING ~~C~l ~~ MARDI ,b X997 aNc~rYEN~ H~gq Following are the bond amounts we are proposing to provide for Interstate Center. Some of these prices are based on bids and are so noted. Landscaping: This bid was from Hillside Nursery, Inc. and is based on the plan prepared by Hillside Nursery and approved by the City - $19,885.00. The total bond amount is $19, 885.00 x 110% _ $21,873.50. ~' / 2. Street.Lights: Three street lights at $1,500.00 = $4,500.00 ~ `~~~~ 3. Irrigation System: This price is based on a bid received on 3/10/97 - $38,560.00. The total bond amount is $38,560.00 x 110% _ $42,416.00. 4. Fencing: This price is based on a quote from Precision Fence Company for $5.50 per lineal foot for six foot high chain link fence. Because the existing fence on the west side of the subdivision_ is adequate, the amount of chain link fence being provided is on the north side of lot 5 and totals 565 feet for a total cost of $3,107.50. The total bond amount is $3,107.50 x 110% _ $3,418.25. The total bond being proposed is $72,207.75. Please call me if you have any questions. If this total bond amount is acceptable, please let me know and the developer will provide a Letter of Credit as soon as possible. Sincerely, BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. ~~ Stan McHutchison, P. E. cc: Jonathan Seel 950615~cnerid.ItS 1111 S. Orchard, Suite 600 • Boise, Idaho 83705 • (208) 344-9700 Fax# (208) 345-2950 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL BRIGGS ENGINEERING, Inc. 1111 So. Orchard St., Suite 600 Boise, Idaho 83705 PHONE: (208) 345-2881 FAX N0: (208) 345-2950 TO .er.~ r ®. WE ARE SENDING YOU ^ ^ WE ARE RETURNING ^ DATE 3• Z L •g 1 ID No. 9 SoG < S JOB NAA1E ~v r t-~-~ ` s~f"a•~C t L ~..~ ~-~-~ JOB ADDRESS ,(~ /~/ qTY, STATE ~- `~` ~ j 1 SHOP DRAW/NGS CHANGE ORDER COPY OF LETTER PLANS OR/G/NAL S FINAL PLA T SPECIE/CA T/ONS COMPUTER , SK OTHER ~ ENCLOSED ^ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA ^ FEDERAL EXPRESS ~I COURIER COPIES DATED ID N0. DESCRIPTION .r- / ~ ~ , THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED ^ FOR APPROt/AL ^ APPROI~fD AS S!/B,N/TIED ~ FOR Ytx/R /NFORMAIXJN ^ APRROV£D AS NOTED ^ AS REQI'/ESTED ^ RETURNED f?7R CORRECTIO ^ FA4 RENEW AND CO,NMENT ^ PRICE ^ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS a.c i',.,c';~~ i~ t v~arreci,~ i~rt ..N Sicti/'.iL_. Ld S tl0~- ann r~ur ci ~~~hS- - _ --.- __--. _-- COPY TO SIGNED BELOW ^ RES(/BMIT GYJP/ES fOR APPROVAL ^ SUBM/T COP/ES FOR D/SIR/B!/AON NS ^ REIURN CORRECIID PR/NIS v~~k ~' ~~9 la 48~~ ~~F:,~;,,~. T (2osa 3s~~;tc2 • P.'tK;.;'2a$~ 3a2-G199 TO_ II~ITI~iSTATE CEN1'F~ 5UBDNISION Sewer, Potable Wat+~r anti Irrigation 8113_PRCPOSAL (UNIT PRIDE) Dated This ~C) day of ~~~~ , 9997 7Tte undersigned hereby certify that they have personalty examined the locations for the Project, INTEI CEh4TER SUBDtV1Sl{~N, and have resod and understand the Plans, Specifications and Contract Documents gave wtsttc:ertti~raced in tttis irr-pn~vement and the method ey wtriCh payment wilt be made For said work end hereby to undertakae and cocnptete the~warlc embraced in this Project in accordance with sofa Plans, Specifications ar+d and at the fallowing schedule of rates and prices: . I~S1;2d ~n the 8:d Schedule for payment are canstdertsd to be mGjdental Hems,. and the Cast< do , included under other items of work listed an the Bid Schedule.} i i BID 9Ct3EDULE ~ ~ 1 8-d Item ~pmx: No_ QuantSty !. f2,1t~B L.I=. 2. 8 ~: F~ch 3. ;i2 '~ f ~, ::538 L.F. 6. 2 Each 6. :798 S.Y. . Unit ITEM WITH UhIIT 1'RtGED BID Price Amount (Unit Prices to be VVritien in Wards} $ ~ 8" Sewer Pipeline, ASTON D-31734 PVC Includittg Excavation, 6ackC~tt) a~nd Bedding Cents ~ ~_ ~`P! Standard Sewer Manholes, Complete ~~ -tGe,~ea...~P '~.o hJw,dl~~ Dollars ~' <o is 4" Sewer Service Tee. Cam fete ,,.~ r Dollars ~~ n 6 -~:tS- 4" ~w~ Servicae Pipeline, ASTM t3=3ffY'34iPVC litctuding Sleeves, Excavation, t3acktill And t3edda-g~ Yc~/ . ~..e.--._ ; ~ a ar`~ Dollars Cents 4" Cteanvut - GamptOte '~,,...-~. Dollars A , ~ ~!r u -- Gents the ~:t~a a t ~a8. t~ $ q' (~t9 i g ~ y~ Type 'P' Surface Repair Including Base artcf Paving (See SP1 ~(72~ ,B.tJi~nn o¢,~ ~ ~~v ~-~ Dollars _ _-- Cents S ~. 3 SJ 95DBi 5lsewer.spc . 3 ~~ (Mate: Unit prices foi•.atl items, extensions arrd t~atai amount of bid must be shown. Show unit prices in vrords and figures. If conflict occurs, the written cr typed words shall prevail. Item$ of work n '~ ~,iiT in^,nu,i ,.,nvJ LIJ-X`•r~rn !CC.T-IaT-rll '~y ~ ~~~ 7 1,571 12" VhFaEer Line, PVG, AWINA C900, Class 15Q ~Lii~., ii` ~ ~w 1'~}~ L.F. including f~ccavak~on. Backf~ll and Bedding f208} 352-"x152 • t=A;;: t2.:t:; Jf::~~ 8. :849 10" 1Nater Line, PNC, AYVWA 0900. Class 150 L.F. 1tlciutiirt~ Excavati 8ackfill and Bedding -- Gents ~ 4 ~ ' ~ 9. i78 ~ $'' Water Line, {fur Services) P1/C, AWWA C904, Class 150 L.F. ~ tnclucling Izxaavatznn, Backfill and Bedding cents s~ ~.. 10. 217: 6" Water Line (For Senrioe$}, t'1/C, AW1NA G90d, Glass 15Q L.1=. _ lndiding Exca atian, Badcfi~ and Bedding .-+~ ~~ s i9 i rs _ Cents 5~ ~ l D 11. 2 12"x12"x14" Tee. Class 250, AWWA C~11U Each- incktading Excavation, Backfill and Bedding ~d~el ~ _ Dollars ~(~ ~ ~~ ^ants 12. , 2 ~ i 2"x a 2"x8' Tee, Class 250, AW WA C-110 Eaci~ Incl~ing Ex~, BaoEtfill and Bedding L7.<rnL ~M,~j ~~ ...21:...n Qollar5 . _ . ~ ~ - ?~ ~ o ~ Cents 13~. : 3 44"X~0'"x8" Tee, Class 254r AWWA X110 Each ~ inal~cling Excavatirxti, eackfdl and Bedding ' 60 ,~s~ `~--~ Cents 14. 5 1 p"x~ p"x6" Tee, Class 254, AVWVA G-110 l=ath ~nclt~cfing Excav~ian, Backfdl ar~d B ding ~ rn olia~ Cents 15. 10 S"x84x6' 'fee; Glass 25(), AVWVA C-110 Each incttpdin~ Excavatia , Backfil}i and Bedding ~ f Dollars ~ ants 16. 1 ~ 8"x8~ x6"'Fee, Ctass 2bp, AWWA C-i 1U F._ach Ir i, ing B.~aivati n,.Bac~c~ill and Bedding ~ ~ " ~' a ~ DoFEars erns 17. 2 10"45° 8ei1d r CiasS 250, AW WA C-110 Each Including E~acavation, Backfiit and l3edding ~'F+s~ k•-~~ro~..ac~ e~w..:f.~ ~ crr~` T)ollatlrs _ Gents 9505'! 5Lsevrer: spc 4 f 4 E ~~~ $_ ~ I ti~~ ~~ ~~ -~ ~~L~:' ~~~d. $ ~~a $ $ X45 2c7 $_ ~~~ r- ;s ~ 2~ s. ~ 43c~,7o ~ g ~3~.6c~ $ f i -.. ~ ,„ ~~ ,~„ ..,,~ n ~ -,~ iT ~ n~~r_~i,i btn:~ a I, .~-'~, ~ ,_,-~ :~ ~.~ T-f~T-S'Gi tiY 18- 4D 20"x:375'Steei Casing, InGudirsg Excavation, L.F=. Backf~lland BeddingE (See SP1005) !~+Cc~ altars Cents 18. 20 24'x:375" Steel Casing, InGuding Excavation, L.F. Backfitl8nd $eddiag (See SIS1~05} a 'l ~c~` Dollars ~W~ ~~i.~4cnQ ~~ Cents 20. 27 ~ Concrete Thrust Black, Inducting Excavation, Each .13 ! , ii and Bedding n~,, t allots - -- - - _ _ Cents 21. 4 12" 1Calve, Class 254, AWWA C-500 Each Inclu~#ing .Excav ,13aekfiU and Bedding `' tars Cents 22. 4 ,~• ~ ~ ~lalve, Class 25Q, AWWA 0-500 Ealcti including i=xcavatian, ckfilt and Berkiing ` Dollars Cents 23, 5 8" Native, Class 250, ArMNA C-5p4 Each kfill and fie d iriCtua~ing EXCaVatian, Sae / ` 1'. J~:JIf-+~ Vl~~.t~.ri_~ f~-~YLJ r_P.e..-~ ~r O! i~r5 Sid Q C CeniS 24. 12 . 8" 3l~tve, Class 2~, A1NWA C-500 ,Each ~ Inclt~l~ing Excavation,. Backfll and ~eddsng . Dollars r ~~ Yo r 25. 1 10" t3lind Flange, Class 250, AYWVA G110 Each including Excavation ar~d Ba Icftil Dollars °Q i a 26. 1 ~ 8" Blind Flange, Class 25q AVWYA C-190 Each induii~-g Excavation and Badcfill ,~~ ~,~. _,,., Q~.~. ~ Dollars ~~~ .~~/lei.---~---vents 27. 10 B" Blind Flange, Class 250, AVWVA C-110 Each Inclliedi>ag Excavation and Backi'i Dollars nts 28. 1 d" Blow-off, Meridian Standard lncludsng Each Thn~t Block, Excavation, Backfill and Bedding Dollars ' nts 950B151sewver_s~sc S ~~ ~ .~ 485€ ; `~''-~~,4,. ~'~ (208} 3!y? ~1 ~? . C.--. , : _"~~~ ,..2 y $ ~ . s-c~ $.~:s Od .O~ $. ~ ~ ~! . So $ ~~ . 1.~D ~ ~.~~ - `-fc~ t $ ~~,~ ~~ $ ~l 3~U $ ~~ ~ Sew ~,tiiT ~n-i~Ni.i i,ln~a 1.1.+"~,~cG J.F.FT-C4T-S'Gi • ~ ~; >/~~! ~a~F i r I 29. 9 2" Siouv-oti', irlcluding Thrust Block, ~$~Q 4"~~i~~ti~ ~ . ; Eacfi Excawation, Badc~li and B dding ~~~va~-.; `~~ ~ ~? taaliars {2Q8ti 2~2~:: ~_. :F:X: ~,,;F• ~ , ~_~ .g{~ 30. 4 'Fire #•~ydrant~~-ssembly, Meridian Standard . Eadi lnclrtding Excavatiian, Ber~cfill and Bedding (Sea S?400'1) I~ ~ .~ aoliars ants ~ l,3~~.~~ ~~ 2~ ~.~ .37 . ~ 1 Retnpve Existing E3lowoff including Excavation, L.S. T3ac~.fill arxt i]isposal, C mplete o ~ ( ~ ~ ~n r~l'l Jct~~ ~~(J~~tdr5 32. 1. Connection 7a F.~ais#ing 16" Line Indutling Excavation, i L.S. Bach. and Furnishing and Installing 17"x10" reducer, Comp3eta ~ _~ -~~~ - , 33. 1,354 10" - PVC~C3ravity Irrigation Pipe, Including , 1=xc~vati+~n,.Bac[d"sll and Bedding and Rip Rap at pipe:disctrarge `n n Mile Creek. ( SA1009} ~ 'r ti ~~r~-aoiiaors ,tiiiia,.v~•~ ~ Cents $ . va ~ 2 ~ ~~C1 . 34. 4 Irrt~atinrt Bo~ce~ #1,2, 8 & 4, Complete . Each incltidi : Excavation a mil ' " , Dollars ~ ~ ~~ Z•C~~ ~ Z. ~. c~ 35. 1 Imtion gox ~5, Gvmplete Including Each Adjrtstable Gate, Excav tiq~n and Backfrli ` - poliars t v nts $~~ ~~~ ~ (~ 36. 1 fsre~sur¢ed irrigation. System, Gompl~e s . Dollars ~ l _ r UyritS $ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ . ,~ ro7~L BID ~.2~9Tz~~ . 3 ~ .. • "`'Fotalt3id Price ta;irrdttde alt permit fees, sales, consumer use and other similar taxes required by law in trie p viher~e the waiic is pe~rrried. The Qwne~ reserve5~ the right to reject any ar an proposals or ba accept the proposal :deemed to be in 1 interest of the Qwner. The Bid Prices written herein >lFtall be valid for Sixty (60j calendar days franc date of bid opening. ~" # n> Q-r ttt ~~~vC,,rr~ ubbrs ~ ~"-w ~ Foci ~ r ~C~ `• /7 95061 ilsewer_spc ' "'~ '~'$,";'~~+ e ~~Yn • J r1A 17 rlh r ~J!7 n I best ^MJ1'(l"~~HW l•JO~~ 6J.~S:~~1 L66T-0T-tee ~ - d ~al^1 The Bidder acknoyuJ edges that he/she has examined onpies of alt the 8iddfn JJ (rec:ei{~t of aJl which is: y:aclcnowledged}: g documents and of the foNowin B d~nd Date R~umber ~ ~ I I t 1 . Narrjes and addresses of subcantrac~ors to wham arm as fotJnws: wa-k will be awarded if the undersigned is ~rded:the c n~ Iraol Name At Subecintractor Addn~ is N° &ubvontraotor shall be changed unless approved in writing by the Owner. ; ~~ ~- ~- ~, (BJdd~r'+s Haire ane Pubf-e vU9ori~5 contrae~r - _ - ~f€s~,/~~~n .S~ `~ License No.) ~ ~f -~/ ~~~ (Authonzed 4fftc~al and Title) ,~,.rr~~w ~f ~ (Address} d+tO.TB$:.. ~: ~ff the Bidder is a copartnership, so state. giving firm name under which business is transacted. ~. Jf tiae; rider is.a carporatian...this ~ ~ . ~ P+~posa! must be execute by its duly aathortzact official 3. Bid pmposaJs shall 1>e in sealed enve s. ~AfGMt~~RIfv~C, fnc, bpes or rollers ~ Said ~'~Posals will be subrmtted artd clearly marked to @ 1GGS Bidden;. fined in isriva~ upon the receipt of girls from a majariry of the ie 4. The selected Contractor is ex Alotice f~a Proceed_ Rect~ed to begin construction within five(5) days. after earl} noti€~ pf 850t3f S;L~ewer. spc 7 INTERSTATE CENTER SUBDIVISION Sewer, Potable Water and Irrigation BID PROPOSAL (UNIT PRICE) Dated This 7 day of fhtc/f , 1997 TO: The undersigned hereby certify that they have personally examined the locations for the Project, INTERSTATE CENTER SUBDIVISION, and have read and understand the Plans, Specifications and Contract Documents governing the work embraced in this improvement and the method by which payment will be made for said work and hereby propose to undertake and complete the work embraced in this Project in accordance with said Plans, Specifications and Contract and at the following schedule of rates and prices: (Note: Unit prices for all items, extensions and total amount of bid must be shown. Show unit prices in both words and figures. If conflict occurs, the written or typed words shall prevail. Items of work not listed in the Bid Schedule for payment are considered to be incidental items, and the cost is to be included under other items of work listed on the Bid Schedule.) BID SCHEDULE Bid Unit Item Approx. ITEM WITH UNIT PRICED BID Price Amount No. Quantity (Unit Prices to be Written in Words) $ $ 1. 2,106 8" Sewer Pipeline, ASTM D-3034 PVC L.F. Including Excavation, Backfill and Bedding ~I~O~1-('(L,~} ~ Dollars Yi o Cents $_L~ $ ~J7~ ~ ~b 2. 8 Standard Sewer Manholes, Complete Each { i,~C=1,UC i-~clnl C]~2.~1~ Dollars N o Cents $ ~ 2.O y $~ (a0 G 3. 12 4" Sewer Service Tee, Complete SI ~CTy Dollars iU 0 Cents $ ~~ $ ~ .Z ~ 4. 538 4" Sewer Service Pipeline, ASTM L.F. D-3034 PVC Including Sleeves, Excavation, Backfill And Bedding _ ~ ~ ~ Dollars 0 Cents $ ~ $ N~ ~ aZ 5. 2 4" Cleanout -Complete Each 'rf•-Zt_`~ {-(Un7~~rZC`l~ Dollars ~ O Cents $ 3~ O $ ~ ~ ~~ 6. 798 Type 'P' Surface Repair Including Base and Paving S.Y. (See SP1002) '~~Ct--~1 L Dollars ~ 0 Cents $~ g ` 15 ~ ~= _/ 950615\sewer.spc 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 1,671 12" Water Line, PVC, AWWA C900, Class 150 L.F. Including Excavation, Backfill and Bedding o 5 5~%~ C^~ ~ ~Z ~ Dollars S 0 - ~ 1 7 2~ 2NZ r~ ~i Cents $ $ 849 10" Water Line, PVC, AWWA C900, Class 1 50 L.F. Including Excavation, Backfill and Bedding i- ~ i~ ~"~ ^~ Dollars ,vv cents $ 15 $ 1 d , 735 178 8" Water Line, (for Services) PVC, AWWA C900, Class 150 L.F. Including Excavation, Backfill and Bedding c-J ~ ~y ~ Dollars _ - ,y o Cents $ 1 a. $ 2l 3 (c 217 6" Water Line (For Services), PVC, AWWA C900, Clas s 150 L.F. Including Excavation, Backfill and Bedding Ti%~ Dollars _ - .tJo Cents $ / 0 $ ~ _ 2 12"x12"x10" Tee, Class 250, AWWA C-110 Each Including Excavation, Backfill and Bedding ~ J~ ri~tNOr2~`1~ Dollars ~- -- U Cents $ 5 ~ ~ $ / ~ ~ ~ 2 12"x12"x8" Tee, Class 250, AWWA C-110 Each Including Excavation, Backfill and Bedding ~i ~~ r4~~~2E I~ Dollars ~0 Cents $ '~~~ $ /ODC 3 10"x10"x8" Tee, Class 250, AWWA C-110 Each Including Excavation, Backfill and Bedding wu .2 i-~t(~ ~7~e`~ Dollars ~0 Cents $ ~ yO $ ~ ~ O C 5 10"x10"x6" Tee, Class 250, AWWA C-110 Each Including Excavation, Backfill and Bedding ~o~~ i-kunl~i'Lc,`l~ Dollars - No Cents $ ~/ OU $ aD0O 10 6"x6"x6" Tee, Class 250, AWWA C-110 Each Including Excavation, Backfill and Bedding w~/z +~h,+N~~+'z~1~ Dollars - ~U Cents $ ~-/OC7 $ LJODC 1 8"x8"x6" Tee, Class 250, AWWA C-110 Each Including Excavation, Backfill and Bedding i ~.iU rf f,{~tJ~72i:1~ i-i GT'~( Dollars ~ = C ) S~ o ~5>/' ~ ents $ ` $ 2 10"x45° Bend, Class 250, AWWA C-110 Each Including Excavation, Backfill and Bedding I~~~. rlu~t7~l~`h S~V~•JTY ~iyr Dollars ` . ,t] U Cents $ .~ ~s $ ss D 950615\sewer.spc 4 18. 40 20"x.375"Steel Casing, Including Excavation, L.F. Backfill and Bedding (See SP1005) ©,J~ N~.yo~2~1~ ~ u~C,J t1 Dollars ~I ~'D D ~ o Cents $ (~ O $ 19. 20 24"x.375" Steel Casing, Including Excavation, L.F. Backfill and Bedding (See SP1005) b.JE ~{u.110,er`l~ 'rffi rz ry' Dollars - - ,v ~ Cents $ l 3 0 $ ~ ~o b 0 20. 27 Concrete Thrust Block, Including Excavatio n, Each Backfill and Bedding Tr+~~t~ F~~~ Dollars - ' c 35 l yS ~l o Cents $ $ 21. 4 12" Valve, Class 250, AWWA C-500 Each Includin Excavation, Backfill and Bedding ~~C=~/ F~CI.r/D~(.'Y~ Dollars - ~~ ~ ~b G~ .cJ o Cents $ $ in 5 ~ 22. 4 ~'" Valve, Class 250, AWWA C-500 ~j ~ ~ U S(,v~ Each Including Excavation, Backfill and Bedding -{ ~'UE J Gap Zy-oo % UN>rLF7~ . Dollars ~ ~ ,~ v Cents $ ~ $ ~~ 23. 5 8" Valve, Class 250, AVW11A C-500 Each Including Excavation, Backfill and Bedding Fc~u2 i-h,~N~2e'~~ Dollars ~ f N yD O a D t7 0 o Cents $ $ 24. 12 6" Valve, Class 250, AVWVA C-500 Each Including Excavation, Backfill and Bedding ~1~~7- /-kr~D,~E"l~ ~-/Fry Dollars - 35~' ~'1a b O ,r~ o Cents $ $ 25. 1 10" Blind Flange, Class 250, AWWA C-110 Each Including Excavation and Backfill TiJc~rfU.dt9~: e~7 Dollars ~d Cents $ ADO $ a~~~ 26. 1 8" Blind Flange, Class 250, AVWVA C-110 Each Including Excavation and Backfill Tc,~~ ~u,~~,^~y Dollars ~' ~tJ ~ Cents $ - a D O $ n oc 0 0 27. 10 6" Blind Flange, Class 250, AWWA C-110 Each Including Excavation and Backfill C~.~cl e' I~it•y>2CJi7 ~/ ~T)' Dollars - ~tJ~ Cents $ / SD $ ~ 5 ~ O 28. 1 4" Blow-Off, Meridian Standard Including Each Thrust Block, Excavation Backfill and Beddin ~ Wv i~uvcl„'C7~ ~(%rJfi F/~o`ilars ~jyC ~Ff~.54,rJ ~ iU Cents $ J ~ ~~ $ I ~ ~ J 950615\sewer.spc 5 29. 9 2" Blow-off, Including Thrust Block, Each Excavation, Backfill and Bedding CIl~~'f- 1~-Lf~~/L~'~L7 Dollars ~~ ~O ,y U Cents $ ~~ ~ $ 30. 4 Fire Hydrant Assembly, Meridian Standard Each Including Excavation, Backfill and Bedding (See SP1001) ~'1h:NT~r.J 1-fu~va2LY~ Dollars ~U Cents $ 1 ~7 DO $ ~ ~'pO 31. 1 Remove Existing Blowoff Including Excavation, L.S. Backfil nd Disposal, Complete f-/~1~10/'L~l~ Dollars ~ p O ,3 C p l it/y Cents $ $ 32. 1 Connection To Existing 10" Line Including Excavation, L.S. Backfill, and Furnishing and Installing 12"x10" reducer, Complete i'ai~ t2 +~i,/,~ID~C c11~ r/ F~~ Dollars _ p Cents $ y 50 $ ysO 33. 1,354 10" -PVC Gravity Irrigation Pipe, Including Excavation, Backfill and Bedding and Rip Rap at pipe discharge into Ten Mile Creek. (See SP1009) Tc,~~C-C%iJ C Dollars ~ 9 0 r «rf1~ ~r ~~ Cents $ (a $ 1 ~, ,3~7~' 34. 4 Irrigation Boxes #1,2, 3 & 4, Complete Each Includin cavation and Backfill CtC- ~~ }}~UNO~'~t~ Dollars NU Cents $ i ~ (7(~ $ ~(~~ 35. 1 Irrigation Box #5, Complete Including Each Adjustable Gate, Excavation and Backfill '~WEnYy Tii Qk~ 1-~WV~~ Dollars 2~~~ ~ ' /Ut~ Cents $ $ 2 ~~~ 36. 1 Pressurized Irrigation System, Complete Lump Sum (See SP-1010) T~~ CST -CI(cu,~r~o (1d~ 1~~/t~ S(4.i~ Dollars -, ~ o Cents $ .5~/ J~~vU $ ~~/ S(o (7 TOTAL BID $ Z 2, ~ 2-sg yU *` Z. ~ 4 ~ b- cl ~ 4- ° '`'` Total Bid Price to include all permit fees, sales, consumer use and other similar taxes required by law in the place where the work is performed. The Owner reserves the right to reject any or all proposals or to accept the proposal deemed to be in the best interest of the Owner. The Bid Prices written herein shall be valid for Sixty (60) calendar days from date of bid opening. 950615\sewer.spc 6 I The Bidder acknowledges that he/she has examined copies of all the Bidding Documents and of the following Addenda (receipt of all which is hereby acknowledged): Date Number Names and addresses of subcontractors to whom work will be awarded if the undersigned is awarded the contract are as follows: Name of Subcontractor Address Jowl (-tr~55 ~s~~Guc17+~~ ! ~ (o(o~ po6rE ~~ C.k-+~t,c)~2C, No subcontractor shall be changed/unless approved in wr11iting by the Owner. S ~o~2uc1.10.~ ~ ~ ~?~i 3 '~~`~(?. -,~. r ~. z~. 32.39. y`~I ~ r~ . ~~ (Bidder's Name:,an11d Public Works Contractor License No.) ~~ Y ( uthorized Official and Title) (Address) NOTES: 1. If the Bidder is a co-partnership, so state, giving firm name under which business is transacted. 2. If the Bidder is a corporation, this proposal must be executed by its duly authorized officials. 3. Bid proposals shall be in sealed envelopes or folders, submitted and clearly marked to BRIGGS ENGINEERING, Inc. Said Proposals will be opened in private upon the receipt of Bids from a majority of the Selected Bidders. 4. The selected Contractor is expected to begin construction within five(5) days after each notification of Notice to Proceed. 950615\sewer.spc 7 MAR-18-1997 16 59 FROM TO MERIDIAN CITY P.01 ~N~;I N EER~NG ~.1 LNG March 13, 1997 Mr. WiI Berg City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 53642 Re: interstate Center Dear WiL Enclosed for your use is a copy of the oid surnmary for Interstate Center Subdivision. please note that the low bid :for the pressure~irrigation system (item #36) is $38, 560.00. Bruce Preckleton suggests that we send the bid summary directly to you. If you would like a copy of the actual bid documents that were submitted, just give me a call. 1 hope this information will suffice. Flease call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, BRIGGS ENGINEERING, ZINC. <,~~ Stan Mc~~Iutchison, p. E. Enclosure: Bid Summary 95061 S\merid.It6 1 ~ 11 S. Orchard, Suite 600 • Boise, Idaho 83705 • (208) 344-9700 Fax# (208) 345-2950 MAR 18 '9? 1?~00 PAGE.01 MRR-18-1997 16 59 FROM F P z J C S V TO MERIDIAN CITY P.f~2 W C1 W C1 W A W W W N W ~ w O N CD N W N V N O N O N I d N ~ W N N N .. N . O -• CO m u Q CT A N ~ ~ tD N V O 01 A W N ~ p ~ W .- 3 7 w ~ ~ =- ... 0 0 W T N A O~ ~e p ~ ma N O A O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A A ja (A m ~ y, ~, ~ ~ ~ _ ~ = ao m ~ Co < < < n x' X X oxo o> O x O x' N x N x ~ ~ O N ' ~ ri to !n 7 ui ~ O , o 7 ' o 7 G C7 T C ` '~ T 4 f~D ~ ~ D ~ - ~ O ~ O ~ N N ~ ~ ~ 'V m m m a <c ~ o, m ° m ° ~ O• ~ ~ b 0 , 0 T T m t co t ~ ~ ~ O O _ W x m x' m x- m ~i ~ m m ~ ~ G ~ r _ x x gy m -1 ' = ^ ~ > > m _~ ~ ~ W A m o > > r r ' c to m cn co ro v ~ CO - ~! . p :.' ~ 7 ~ W C m W C CD m -1 -~ -~ - m [b 7 ~ d ~ C ~ m a o~ of ~ m a ~ °~ m ce m m m m ~t m ~ ~ m w o a ~' m m ~' ~ ~, o 7 j ~ - ~ v> o > ~, \ W O' C7 w n m W ro -i a < y V m ~ ~ -- O n m ~ w c9 a W L+ O X ~ 7 d - m S a ~ a w ~ A o C m _ ~ m m 4~ I W -+ A i O A -+ ~ .A CO ~. ~ O ~ r ~ N [J1 A A N N A _ N. -' m W V th _ , V O O N ~ O GT w N N V 0 fG -+ pD N m N m Qf ~, q D W CD G1f O u N (J O J -+ vi N A N W J V q OD N : ~ N LY ~ Vr N rq N S Yn W N A S? V N V to 4f - '0 -• N N i0 N N .D. N A N {pa m (J1 Co CT N tp N N M tO W N j N tp ~ C ~ ~, N ~ V1 O N 0 0 0 0 ~ O O O O O cn O O tl~ O O O O O O O N ai V N O 0 O O O~ m n ~ O O O Gil O O O O O 0 0 0 0 S O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O c,. O O ~ O O S pp O I O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ~. C A +n W CA A N N A r ~! q ~, iA T (p V N •+ Q -+ y ,H {O A N N N N N N ~ !O N N d ~ w YA A A N N ~ N ~ V! -+ N N N N J N w N (D t? CC t/f A w tD ~ w V D m O ~ m W W O A D W m A cn W O CO O N O N v CT S N 0 N 0 N 0 O 0 m 0 m~ S cp .p 6f p m 0 Cn tn N Cn O O ~ N o O pp O o -~ J y w .7 w N A (71 v Oa p m ~ J N W pp cO o a ~ ~ hb CA O O O m 0 0 0 0 OA O O O O O C71 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O C O C> cT N Q1 O N O O m W o O o O g ~ O o O o O o O $ o S O O O S ~ fl o o o o $ $ o S S S O O ~ o o S a S o o 0 ~_ ~ IV O O N m N N .p A e. ~ W as J ~ W ar m• m N W V fT N V N t0 *n N ~n i'/ N N N N T A A N O iR G7 N (D to ~n m ce Va y ~ N ~ N r n ~ ~ m ~ A A N tD W W ~ O CO V O O W Vi V (T V W tp CJt Uf ~. -~ W A W ~ W }~ O ... OD Q~ O vt CT V W T W O N L CO to N .D. ... O ~ N ~. A -. V ~ O -. O q J W OD 0 m _ o t7 m ~ ~ 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 G7 0 m 0 N 0 tTf 0 CJ+ 0 Cn 0 O 0 A 0 m 0 m 0 fT 0 to 0 CO 0 A 0 W 0 E 0 p1 0 V 0 Of 0 N 0 -+ 0 ~ 0 N 0 ~A 0 cD W W A tp O O _ 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n N A O 01 N N W A ~ N N to V1 T ~ ~ A N J W N N W ~ ~ N ?J N N j 4f J N N N N j N N N t0 N fJ 4a tJ it CO tN W O ~ R7 N _N CO ^' -~ O W N A -+ m A A CT G1 N W CD W W O tJt V fA <T +A O N O C7 Q1 O Ut ~l N tD W O W {a Cn ~P N f71 W Q1 -~ U1 O 1 W (p CO A -+ / ~ N fD O N (D A O V 2 C N ~ . A i> W Q7 W ~ G7t ~. W CT ~! t0 :P CO CD Q~ ~+ W Q> O V C1 W 0 A O 00 G ~ V ~ N C9I O O V N r 01 ... O1 W C7 A A V 7 W m O ~ O 0 O 0 O 0 O m O N O m O Cs+ O 0 O c7~ O O O m O O O N 0 0 0 Cdr 0 O 0 O 0 W 0 ~ 0 O 0 tT 0 Cb 0 A 0 N 0 V 0 p~ m tp A O N 00 O CA W . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ~ C n ~ m ~. D _W ~ t q O N O N O N C V O V! t O R O K O N f O b O q O N O O> t O p O !A O A O N O w O N O N O O1 O N O M O N O ~ O V O M O 4? O V1 O N ' O fN O <,b O 4 S O O O O O O O O qq O S 0 0 0 0 0 0 S O O O 0 0 O S O 0 0 0 O O O ~_ ~ Q ~ n m ~ 'i d Z D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S D ~ m ~ cc m z ~ ~ m v ~ ~ y ~ ~ D ~. ~_ < O Vl Z O Z f.Tf O '.~ W r MAR 18 '97 1?~01 TOTAL P.02 PAGE.02 ~~dGINEER//yG ~.r.~yy ,ry¢ lt~ BRIGGS l~A~ 1 9 1997 1 N C. Li 1 I ll~ ~~5-l~~t~-~ March 13, 1997 Mr. Wil Berg City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Interstate Center Dear Wil: Enclosed for your use is a copy of the bid summary for Interstate Center Subdivision. Please note that the low bid for the pressure irrigation system (Item #36) is $3 $, 560.00. Bruce Freckleton suggests that we send the bid summary directly to you. If you would like a copy of the actual bid documents that were sub-nitted, just give me a call I hope this information will suffice. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely9 BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. Stan McHutchison, P. E. Enclosure: Bid Summary 950615\merid.lt6 1111 S. Orchard, Suite 600 • Boise, Idaho 83705 • (208) 344-9700 Fax# (208) 345-2950 n W W W W W W W N N N N N N N N N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ -+ Z ~ ~ O) (77 A W N ~ O (D OD V O) U7 A W N ~ O (O W V O) CT A W N ~ O (O OJ V O) U7 A W N S O 3 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ -+ O (7 O 7] m T ~ N - A - Q) OD ~ O) 00 ~ (7 N N --~ W O) ~ ~ -~ ~ m dD -+ ~ ~ A A A (~ OD ~ ~ ~ ~' . ~' - m - W O - m - < N O n A x O x O x = oxo °' O O N N ~ ~ O - N < o _ n _ _ _ m -- . O O ~ v ~ O 0 < 2 ~ p o 7 7 W i n ~ ~ O O A ~ ~ m d ~ ~ N m m n ~ ~ D N~ 7 ~ n ' " O D. ~ ~ d O- 7 (D ~ ~ V V ~ X 0) X O) O O N N N (D d ni ~ - d ~ fD ~ fD a ~ fp r' O D 0 n O m N Q ~ T T n N N C77 C77 0 X X X x. ~ ~ O _ ~ x 0 x ' m 7 ~ X ~ 7 .. M r r ~, y > y > T m ~ ~ ' (n ' cn W j -~ m ~ m ~ 00 00 O r ~• r = ~ r r C ~ C (n O (n m ~ m ~ ~. p _W f0~ 7L N ~' O 7 y W (D f0 ~ (D N d N ~ --i ~ -i N (D ~ ~ d G G ~ (D m 0 ~ C71 ~ < X t0 N O O O N fD fD N (D O O ~ 7 ~' ~ - N~ 07 3 ~ W C7 n N ~ ~ ~ ~ (D K O N _. ~ O Q ~ ~ N y ~ ~' fD ] 6f < W ~' ~ ~ < '~ ~ g• °i m ~ o a ~ ~ m A = ~ m y ~ 3 ~ - ~, -o r ~ O ~ > ~ ~. ,. o' N ~ A A ~ ~ A (D ~ O ~ ~ N CT A A V O O N --~ O C77 W N N V 00 CO ~ Oo N Oo N W O) u a > y; W u u j j Qo U W CT N W J ~ u u A u W V u 00 N u ~ u N u N u W u A u V u V u u -~ u ~ u N u N u A u A u A u CT u GT u u u u u u W u N u ~ C n ~ ! ~ N 1 rn O 0 O 0 O ~ N cn O O O O O O V cn O O cn O O W W N V cn O O O O O -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O to rn O - m .. O Cn O O O O O Q> O cn O O cri O O O O O O O N cn V N O cD 0 0 Oo ~ 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o in 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ O O O C7t O O O O O O O O O O G O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O y 1 ~ D ?. W 00 u N u A ~ V u u u W u V u ~ u -+ u u u A u N u N u N u u N u A u u u A u N u ~ u u ~ u N u N f N ~ N CO u CO u u A u u CO u W V p~ Q O ~ C.ti W A W A W OJ N N U7 N N N O 00 00 (D O) 00 (77 N O O N O O ~ ~ V N V7 O) W V QI fD C O O O (O cr O O O V O O O O O O O A 0 0 cn cn O O O O O V W W A V O A N O O ~ ~ O O O 00 O O O O cn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) cn N m O N O O W OO O O O c0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CJ7 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O u A u u u u ~ W N O u W u A u J W u V f W u u u u W u CJ7 u V u CO u u ~ u u N u N u O u A u O u O) u (D u u u u u u ~ u J N u ~ ~. j y O O) ~ u A 0) O V O) CSC U7 m (J7 ~ O) W W O O O U7 W W N O N -~ -+ ~ ~ ~ ~ u W O ~ n ~ A A N cD w ~ N O W v V cD cn --~ A A A -• 0) cn V m 0 ~ cn A O N A V rn O V Ca Oo A m CJ7 ~ O O O) O) 00 N (J7 CT U7 O A 00 00 C17 (77 CD A W ~ O V O) N ~ ~ N A CO W 00 A (D O O) _ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C7 u A 00 u N u W N u u CJ7 u O) u ~ u u A u N u W u W u u N u W u u u D1 u N u ~ u -+ u -+ u N u N N N CD W u u W u u (D W O 3 W ~ O N ~ A u N CO W CJ7 u u N CJ7 O V (O O A A N W ~ 00 W 00 ~ ~ N CO O N CO A O) V O a C N -' O) A 00 A Q) W W O V CJ1 O) O) (71 (J7 N W W CTt ~ Ut ~ Ut ~ W A CD V N ~ O N 00 O) O) A 7 ~ A A N Q) W ~ C77 ~ W C77 V (O A (D (D D7 ~ Ca O) O V O) W A O 00 ~ ~ CJ7 O V ~ ~ ~ A V " W C7~ X 0 0 O) O) N W Cn Q CJl O 00 O N O (Jl O O O) ~ O 01 00 A N V O) O) CO A O) N OD O O) W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ~ C Ci ?. rn .+ D ~ o a c {? i? fA (? u u +h fA iA i? V} u u u u N f? (R +A ih (A u t? 41 u u u u 4Y {? u u .=~r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E P P n r p~ S w v v _~ ~ Q cn O m m C7 Z_ 70 Z O Z W ~ m r ~ ~ m s ~ D D ~ m m ~ n ~ ~ Z D .i ~ Z m v ~ ~ ~ ~ c W D ~_ 0 ~ Z Q z O ~_