Loading...
Staff ReportSTAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: June 1, 2010 ' TO: Mayor and City Council E IDIAN~-~- FROM: Bill Parsons, Associate City Planner ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (208) 884-5533 SUBJECT: MDA-10-006 -Spring Creek Ustick (aka Ashtyn Park) I. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The Applicant, Douglas Clegg, is requesting to modify several provisions of the recorded development agreement (instrument #107022433) approved with the Ashtyn Park annexation. The applicant wishes to amend the DA to move forward with developing the site with an assisted living facility instead of six building office complex. A new concept plan and building elevations are attached in Exhibit A below. II. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the application as detailed in Section VIII of the staff report. III. PROPOSED MOTION Approval After considering all Staff, Applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve File Number MDA- 10-006, as presented in Staff Report for the hearing date of June 1, 2010, with the following changes: (insert any changes here). I further move to direct Legal Department Staff to prepare a Development Agreement for this site that reflects the changes noted in Section VIII. Denial After considering all Staff, Applicant, and public testimony, I move to deny File Number MDA-10- 006, as presented during the hearing on June 1, 2010. (You should state why you are denying the request.) Continuance I move to continue File Number MDA-10-006 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (you should state specific reason(s) for continuance) IV. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS A. Site Address/Location: The site is located on the southwest corner of Ustick Road and Meridian Road in the northeast '/a of Section 1, Township 3 North, Range 1 West B. Owner(s): David and Charlie Price 2291 N. Greenview Court Eagle, ID 83616 C. Applicant/Representative: Doug Clegg 253 E. Calderwood, Suite E Meridian, Idaho 83642 D. Applicant's Statement/Justification: Please see applicant's narrative for this information (Exhibit Spring Creek Ustick MDA Page 6 A.4). V. PROCESS FACTS A. The subject application is a request for a development agreement modification. Per Meridian City Code, a public hearing is required before the City Council on this matter. B. Newspaper notifications published on: May 10, and 24, 2010 C. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: May 7, 2010 D. Applicant posted notice on site by: May 13, 2010 VI. LAND USE A. Existing Land Use(s) and Zoning: This site consists of vacant, un-platted land, zoned L-O. B. Character of Surrounding Area and Adjacent Land Use and Zoning: This site is currently surrounded by a mix of uses that include single family residences, a city park, a developing office complex and a church. North: Settlers Park, zoned L-O East: Single-family residential properties in Eastbrook Village Subdivision and a Single Family Residence, zoned R-8 and R-4 South: Rural Residence, zoned RUT in Ada County West: Church, zoned L-O C. History of Previous Actions: • In 2006, this property was annexed (AZ-06-034) with an L-O zoning district. A development agreement (DA), instrument #107022433, was recorded as a provision of annexation. D. Utilities: 1. Public Works: Location of sewer: There is a City of Meridian sewer main in Meridian Road. The sewer line that crosses this property is a private facility and would not be eligible to be connected to. Location of water: There is currently a water main in Meridian Road and W Ustick Road. Issues or concerns: The applicant will need to continue to provide a City sewer service through this site; the existing line is private and is not eligible to be connected to. Public Works Staff does not support the removal of DA provision #15 and recommends Council require the applicant to install a pressurized irrigation system. VII. AGENCY COMMENTS MEETING No other comments were received by the Planning Department for the subject application. VIII. STAFF ANALYSIS When the annexation was approved in 2006, a development agreement (DA) was approved that included a conceptual site plan for a six building office complex. The site plan showed conceptual building pad locations, parking, drive aisles, and access points to the site (see Exhibit A.2). Because the applicant did not have specific users for the site at that time, the plan was conceptual in nature. Now, the applicant is requesting to amend the DA to develop the site with a single story 30,000 square foot assisted living facility. Specific provisions of the DA make it impractical to commence the use and develop the site as proposed. Spring Creek Ustick MDA Page 7 The recorded DA requires compliance with an approved concept plan that depicts six office buildings, limits building size to 5,000 square feet and limits uses on the site to only principally permitted uses in the L-O zoning district. Further, other provisions require the installation of the landscape buffers prior to occupancy of the first building on the site. The applicant has provided a new concept plan and new building elevations that depict the future development of the site. It is important to note the applicant will have to obtain CUP and design review approval prior to commencement of the use. The DA modification is needed before the applicant can move forward with subsequent applications. The following is a summary of the modified provisions of the DA and staffs analysis thereof: (proposed changes are provided in strikethrough and underline format) 1. Section ~?' ~~ ° ~" ~ ~ t t:: ~ + Pl ., p •, Dln,.. .. Tl: o,.+.. .-.+L.o a ,a •L, 1, !` ,]'+' 1 TT D '• • That development of this property shall eg_ nerally conform to the Concept Plan prepared b~Aspen Engineers, dated 5-04-10, labeled Spring Creek Ustick as determined by the Planning Director or otherwise approved through a Conditional Use Permit. The applicant has submitted a new concept plan that depicts only one building, therefore a new concept plan has been provided. 2. (Section 5, #6) T'~~l~v~l~e-tk~e~le~ved~se~e~ieF°~nne~a~ly • The uses allowed pursuant to this agreement are those uses allowed in the L-O zoning district listed in UDC Table 11-2B-2. Staff is recommending this DA provision be amended because an assisted living facility requires procurement of a CUP. 3. (Section 5, #7) Tl:ut two h,.,,..~ ,.c,. a .,.: ~T...~i wo i:.,.,:.ea +„ ~ ,. .,. i n ,. v vui u Staff is recommending the following provision be removed from the DA. The reason for the removal is the UDC currently restricts the hours of operation between 6 am and 10 pm for L-O zoned property. Further, the normal administrative operations for the facility will occur between the specified hours outlined in the UDC. The primary function of the evening nursing staff is to provide care to the residents. The UDC specifically states the hours of operation do not apply to business operations occurring after hours by a limited number of employees. The applicant has indicated that two nurses are required by State of Idaho for a facility of this size. Therefore, staff believes this provision of the UDC does not conflict with the 24-hour nursing care proposed for the facility. 4. (Section 5, # 8) > > 0 !`,,,.,1;+:..,..,1 T Tie De.-.~.;+ • That one building may be constructed on this site. That said building_shall not exceed a maximum size of 30,000 square feet and limited to a sin lg e-story. Roof pitch shall be 6/12 with awnings over exterior entrances and variations over windows. Columns shall be constructed of stucco and/or stucco accents as submitted on the concept elevations Spring Creek Ustick MDA Page 8 (attached as Exhibit A.31. Windows with colored trim and accented fascia to be included Said structure shall conform to pictures/elevations submitted with any CUP and design review applications and as determined by the Planning Director For illustrative purposes only, the applicant has provided new building elevations of the assisted living facility. The proposed use requires procurement of a CUP. Further the UDC requires the site and building design to receive administrative design review approval. Staff will provide a more detailed analysis of the site plan and building elevations with the submittal of the CUP and design review applications. 5. (Section 5, #9) That a 25-foot wide landscape street buffer will be constructed adjacent to Meridian Road, and Ustick Road, unless approved through alternative compliance, located entirely outside of the right-of--way; that said landscape buffers shall be installed prior to occupancy of the assisted livin facility ~~~'~ ~~Aig on this site. The applicant has requested to install a 20-foot landscape buffer in lieu of the 25-foot buffer required by both the DA and the UDC. The submitted concept plan depicts a 20-foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to Ustick Road and Meridian Road. Staff is recommending the DA provision be modified to include a request that the landscape buffer maybe reduced if approved by alternative compliance. 6. (Section 5, #10) That a 20-foot wide land use buffer, constructed in accordance with the UDC, will be installed along the south and west property lines; that said land use buffers shall be installed prior to occupancy of the assisted livin fg acility €rrs~e£~€i~i~g on this site. 7. (Section 5, #15) That the applicant shall be required to install a pressurized irrigation system for this development. The system shall utilize surface water for its primary source. The applicant has requested the removal of DA provision #15 which requires the installation of a pressurized irrigation system. The UDC (11-3A-15) requires the each development to provide a pressurized irrigation system however these same standards also maybe waived if the property does not have water rights in an existing irrigation district. The applicant stated in the narrative this is the case however proof from the irrigation district was not submitted with the subject application. Therefore, City Staff is recommending Council require the applicant to install a pressurized irrigation system. In summary, staff supports the changes to the development agreement proposed by the applicant along with those recommended by staff, as detailed above. IX. EXHIBITS A. Maps/Other 1. Vicinity/Zoning Map -Property Subject to Development Agreement 2. Approved Concept Plan 3. Proposed Concept Plan and Proposed Elevations 4. Applicant's Narrative Spring Creek Ustick MDA Page 9 Spring Creek Ustick MDA Page 10 Exhibit A.1 -Vicinity/Zoning Map Exhibit A.2 -Approved Concept Plan ~~ ~~ ~S#1~1C~i~c~~~ ..,..~., ~.,~ .~ a ~, c. ~ co ~I x.. I~ 4 Spring Creek Ustick MDA Page 11 Exhibit A.3 -Proposed Concept Plan .o o ~ ~ C~> 1 Npf +! R .roe wM~inam11O°i rt u6~pt gip' _ _ - ~ „, ~ ..~ '~ M smear ~ ~ •. ~ I ~ _~_..__--.~ L.. 1 ~' ~ i ~~. _ w+oooamru - ~~I -. ,~ . Jam.. 1 riN x YwO~ ao ~ ~ ~ r _ ~~ J ~ ~- r- ~ ~~ ~ j , e ~ ~ ~`~`-~ * 9sS J J a 4O ~ ~ 4 ~' i [ ~IU110! !~-~f Qt it ~ IYiasf Kfi QMr y f rl W # t ~, c~eoou ~ /~ ~ ~ z ~ ~~ ~' ( ~z ~ w ~ ,~ ~ a y M ~~ ~*K 1 Q { , ~ ~~ i ~ t?2 ~ Nar OMMESwr r I/iNa~Lfl Q ~ Z ~ 0. - >. ~, .. QA 1 Spring Creek Ustick MDA Page 12 Spring Creek Ustick MDA Page 13 Exhibit A.3 -Approved and Proposed Elevations ~~.~~ _ ~~ QEST FtEYAilON M ~Y UW10 KIAM~If MW011 UML ~~i ~~Y r r ~~. ~s wwr r ~ A~,Q Spring Creek Ustick MDA Page 14 Exhibit A.4 -Applicant's Narrative ~r~~~ --~~ If~EPEhDEi~E[ ~ AS915tED WNG - A4EA+tD(tY CARE Apri120, 2010 Gity of Meridian 33 E. d3roadway Avemue, Suite 210 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Itog~trding: Modification of Devebpment Agroemerrt dated September 26, 2006, reoordod February 1 S, 2007 under ~sdument number 107022433 To wham it mny oon~rn: David Price, the origiead dervaloper and applicant of the Aahtyn Park office developmart has asked me Douglas Clegg, as the managing member of Spring Creek Idaho; to rogtreat a modification to d~ above nrerrtia-ed dervelrpment agreemerrt domed saptember 26, 200b and recorded F®bruary 1 s, 2007 tinder tbo inatnanatt mmrber 107022433 by 7. David Navarro as the AAA COUNTY 1tECOdZDER Asht~m Park was origirrslly designed as a professiomel office development and was entranced and tsaned LO into the City of Moridiatr. David boa been as investor with Spring Creek Idaho for five years and cansegrtartly has soon the value of wdun an misted living project cxm bring bo a community. Aflor severed nwrrttrs of market studies, mapping atndica, and site use pdara vwe have oornchrded that this location is an ideal aetNng for ono of our facilities. Of necessity vwe are sedcing some changes to dro odgitad development agroemerrt dart aeom to adigo with the needs of a pnojed of this nature. specifically we ern requeatiag the fdbwirtg changes utrdor section 5.1 of said developmerrt agreerrrerrt: • (I) That devedopmerrt of this property shall gererally conform to the Concgtt Plet- prepared by The I.attd (3rotrp, Inc., dated 6-13-06, labeled Sheet Ll .0., as determined by the Pluming Director or odrerwiae approved through a Conditional Use Permit + To read That doveiopment of this pmpaty shall generally onafarm to the Concept Plan propred by Aapom Engineers dated May 4, 20d01abeled Spring Credo Ustick as determined by Plermiag Director or odrawise approved through a Conditional Use Permit, + Reaaost for eirrrrple - Corrcapt plan will need tD reflect ono proposed assisted living facility instead of six atllaea. • (2) That the hams of opaatiort shall bo limited m b sat. To l0 pm. + To r+errd - That the hours of opaation shalt lre regulated by the Deperdnatt of Health and R-elfiae. i< is understood that atafling for said facility is neoaassry for the life sad sakty of readdaata 24 hour a day 7 days a weak. + Reseou for CI-age - A rmidesrtial haaklr care licaree in the State of Idaho na~sitaties 24 hour wekc care. Cienaaliy apeskitrg required staff far a flrcility of this size ds 8 during wake hours and 2 during nigdrt needs, which aro usually betweaa 10 pm and 6 am. • ($) That up to six oRioe-type buildings may bo can~nrcted an this site. That acid bnildiaga slwU have a maximum size of 5,000 equate few,t ~, and be limbed to a ainglo-s6ory. Bach building shall provide; varLtiora In roof Imes widr at least a portdaat of the roof'having a minimum til12 pitch, awnings ovx some of the windows and the building erthanoe, adunura, at lest 2594 of the front sad apeef'facing frrpado to contain window+a, end at daaat two different types of aiding sod secerrt materials. Tlut sU now will be generally compadbb in appearance and bulk with the provisions listed above end the picdaes submitted Spring Creek Ustick MDA Page 15 e~prir>g Creek woEwnoea .. o ux~c - u~ua+r o~se ~ywr.semanor.eom Saa-4062667 Verge 2 of 2 with the annexation application, as determined by the Planning Director or otherwise approved through a Conditional Use Permit. • To Read -That one assisted living building may be constructed on this site. That said building shall have a maximum of 30,000 square feet and limited to a single-story. Roof pitch shall be 6/12 pitch with awnings over exterior entrances and variations over windows. Columns will be constructed with rock/stucco accents as noted on submitted concept elevation plans. Windows with colored trim and accented fascia to be included. Said structure shall conform to pictures to be submitted in design review applications, and as determined by the Planning Director or otherwise approved through a Conditional Use Permit. • Reason for Change -One assisted living facility, which has been previously constructed on Overland and Five Mile in the City of Boise does not reflect the original pictures and design recommendations by previous applicant/developer. • (9) That a 25-foot wide landscape buffer will be constructed adjacent to Meridian Road, and Ustick Road, located entirely outside of the right-of--way; that said landscape buffers shall be installed prior to occupancy of the first office building on the site. • To Read - That a 20-foot wide landscape street buffer will be constructed adjacent to Meridian Road and Ustick Road, located 20' behind proposed back of curb for future ACRD improvements. Said landscape buffers shall be installed concurrently with the construction of said facility and prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. • Reawe for Change -Applicant is seeking to relocato five feet of previously required buffer adjacent to building, surrounding resident patios to provide more green-space accessible to seniors, In addition to this, applicant exceeds landscape ratios and density in tree caliper and shrubs far above City of Meridian landscape requirements. Application for alternative compliance will be submitted concurrently with this application if required for approval. • (10) That a 20-foot wide land use buffer, constructed in accordance with the UDC, will be installed along the south and west property lines; that said use buffers shall be installed prior to occupancy of the first office building on this site. • To Read - That a 20-foot wide land use buffer, constructed in accordance with the UDC, will be installed along the south and west property lines; that said land use buffers shall be installed concurrently with the construction of said facility and prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. • Reason for Change -Applicant needs full access to all areas of site to construct one building. Having landscape buffers completed prior to completion of proposed building would inhibited contractor to complete vertical improvements without damage and consequently additional cost to recover damaged landscape buffer. • (1ST That the applicant shall be required to install a pressurized in igation system for this development. The system shell utilize surface water for its primary source. • To Read -Strike from development agreement • Reason for Change -Current lateral, tap and use location of said property prohibits a rotational use of water rights that is compatible for a pressure irrigation system (every 11 days for limited time at end of lateral). Developer has more information willing to share at hearing. We want to thank you for the opportunity W request the above changes and hope that some of our recommendations will produce an improved use of said development and consequently fulfill the City of Meridian's Goal that improves family life and community. Sincerely, Douglas B. Clegg CEO 4 Spring Creek Ustick MDA Page 16