The URL can be used to link to this page

Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park CZCCERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: OWNER: April 9, 2010 Steve Siddoway, Meridian Parks & Recreation CMIEN,!b�%-, Sonya Watters, Associate City Planner Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park — CZC-10-018/DES-10-012 Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST The applicant, Steve Siddoway, Meridian Parks & Recreation, requests Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) and Design Review (DES) approval for construction of the following ancillary structures at Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park: trash enclosures (where occur), (1) entry feature, (2) 2,000 square foot signature picnic facilities, (2) small restrooms, (1) large restroom, (1) concession building, (1) band shell, and (1) maintenance building. The overall design of the park site and landscaping was previously reviewed and approved with CZC-10- 018 and DES -10-012. The subject CZC is only for the previously mentioned structures located on the park site. The library and senior center (and possibly another restroom facility and picnic shelter) will be approved with subsequent CZC's. The site is located off the north east corner of E. Fairview Avenue and N. Eagle Road. DECISION The applicant's request for CZC & DES is approved with the conditions listed in this report. Note: This is not a building permit Prior to any construction, you should contact Building Services at (208)887-2211 to verify if any additional permits and/or inspections will be required Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. The landscape plan prepared by Parametrix on 3/10/10, labeled Sheets LS 1-LS4, is approved (stamped "approved" on 3/9/10 by the City of Meridian Planning Department) with no changes. 2. The elevations prepared by Parametrix on 3/10/10, are approved (stamped "approved" on 3/10/10 by the City of Meridian Planning Department) with no changes. 3. The elevations are not to be altered without prior written approval of the City of Meridian Planning Department. Process Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall pay any applicable impact fees prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. If any changes must be made to the site plan to accommodate ACHD requirements, the applicant shall submit a new site plan to the City of Meridian Planning Department for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Conditions Document 1 Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC 3. The applicant shall complete all required improvements prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. It is unlawful to use or occupy any building or structure until the Building Official has issued a Certificate of Occupancy. Ongoing Conditions of Approval 1. The project is subject to all current City of Meridian ordinances and previous conditions of approval associated with this site ([add all applicable development applications]). 2. The issuance of this CZC does not release the applicant from any previous requirements of the other permits issued for the site. 3. The applicant has a continuing obligation to comply with the outdoor lighting provisions as set forth in UDC 11-3A-11. 4. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain all landscaping and constructed features within the clear vision triangle consistent with the standards in UDC 11-3A-3. EDITS A. Vicinity Map B. Trash Enclosure (dated 3/10/10) C. Entry Feature (dated 3/10/10) D. Signature Picnic Facility (dated 3/10/10) E. Small Restroom Facility (dated 3/10/10) F. Large Restroom Facility (dated 3/10/10) G. Concessions (dated 3/10/10) H. Band Shell (dated 3/10/10) I. Maintenance Building (dated 3/10/10) Conditions Document 2 Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC Exhibit A — Vicinity Map 2 w eo*-Ww sr `, Z'`\.� x Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park — Park Structures CZC Exhibit B — Trash Enclosure (dated: 3/10/10) 7 z ELEVATION - SIDE ELEVATION - FRONT FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION - SIDE ELEVATION REAR 5 M-- WT"p TRASH ENCLOSURE Al Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park — Park Structures CZC Exhibit C - Entry Feature (dated 3/10/10) Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park — Park Structures CZC Exhibit D - Signature Picnic Facility (dated 3/10/10) 1 ELEVATION - FRONT &REAR 2 EKL�EVAwTrgN -SIDE NOTPoRGTRM- .§W0DRAF°""""'°'m""°`°""'""°` SIGNATURE PICNIC FACILITY F Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park — Park Structures CZC Exhibit E - Small Restroom Facility (dated 3/10/10) Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park— Park Structures CZC T L 1 a F QY rv� r -IF mon I 1 Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park— Park Structures CZC Exhibit F - Large Restroom Facility (dated 3/10/10) 4ELL4ELVA+ATTION - SIDE L- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 FLOOR PLAN .ru w+ro 5 ELEVATION - SIDE 3 ELEVATION - FRONT 2 ELEVATION - REAR rxs w+ro w w• r - NOT FOR ,uawrMu�r�nwt►ww DRAFT LARGE RESTROOM LAB COR67RU F r" OMO Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park — Park Structures CZC Exhibit G - Concessions (dated 3/10/10) 4 ELEVATION -SIDE 2 ELEVATION -FRONT w+a w+ro wic w+re CJ ELEVATION -SIDE3 ELEVATION— �-REAR — —J -----1-------------I I I I w; m I I I e I I I I� I A A 1 FLOOR PLAN rxa w+'o wffmR - _ -�- M•�'urrao'rYsnM`ruw CONCESSIONS DRAFT EA7 1E_ . coNmwcraN °"`"".°"'°11 Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park — Park Structures CZC Exhibit H - Band Shell (dated 3/10/10) 2 _ELEVATION - EIDE NOT FON ELEVATION - FRONT ,�. N�Jaaaaa�a�aa�ra _.._....-.... ".� ,�..� DRAFT BAND KNELL AIO r= - Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park — Park Structures CZC Exhibit I - Maintenance Building (dated 3/10/10) A.T! !LIVATIONS DFFWA.NLRACKD ARIA C.I.NO! .YILDINO. A ELEVATION w • DIM: --�,� 2 �ELEVATION - REAR .M .«, Z9L1GF IMF" �R.lrr �,WRrIW.WWII DRAFT Ij—�� mnWA+.e, ..InrNa MAINTENANCE BUILDING Aly F A. .M..T Al. FDR FLAN AND ALIVATI.N..f WMN RA.R ANG C.I.NOf .VILDIN.. ELEVATION •BIDE ......... _... .. __.. i 2 ELEVATION - FRONT r'-• IINF011 r;;.7;. N, IDwN.srrww ••••� ,�, « _ •W Iz -•"—I DRAFT R anWNnsm�.m.lrsN .MAINTENANCE BUILDING A16 "' cry.... Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park — Park Structures CZC Y 4 �I I Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memori al Park —Park Structures CZC j _ � I'e..LI � �' +S•z k A ELEVATION - SIDE 3, x 3 FLOOR PLAN 2 ELEVATION - REAR ��~ ... m a �^ w—�� DRAFT /� x...� NOTFM w�IRJIN IL IulIJl111NOItl�L1V11R �^— a"TA0"1tO"�1M°'�"+'"M0° MAINTENANCE BUILDING A14 ��; "' •••. I I fbMRITN/'1UCTION I..ornwo Y 4 �I I Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memori al Park —Park Structures CZC Planning Department E IDIAN j STRATIVE REVIEW APPLICATION Type of Review Requested (check all that apply) ❑ Accessory Use ❑ Alternative Compliance Certificate of Zoning Compliance ❑ Certificate of Zoning Compliance Verification ❑ Conditional Use Permit Minor Modification [✓j'Design Review []Private Street ❑ Property Boundary Adjustment ❑ Time Extension (Director) ❑ Vacation ❑ Other STAFF USE ONLY: Filenumber(s): �'' 10 "OZS j DES -to' ?.0 Project name: 301" I'S M. "e;r%,er "ernoKoJ Date filed: �— 1— 10 Date complete: Assigned Planner: _5o 2qalA_)0.i-K--9_S Related files: 10 - 018 ; DES—to'D t Applicant Information Applicant name: Steve Siddowav Meridian Parks & Recreation Phone: 208-888-3579 Applicant address: 33 E Broadway Ave Meridian ID Zip: 83642 Applicant's interest in property: ❑ Own ❑ Rent ❑ Optioned ❑ Other Owner name: Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Phone: 208-466-9264 Owner address: 217 W Georgia Ave., Ste 100 Nampa, ID Zip: 83686 Agent name (e.g., architect, engineer, developer, representative): Engineer Firm name: Parametria Phone: 208-898-0012 Address: 7761 W Riverside Dr., Ste 201 Boise, ID _ Zip: 83714 Primary contact is: []Applicant ❑Owner ElAgent []Other Contact name: Dave Meldrum Phone: 208-898-0012 E-mail: dmeldrum(@t)arametrix.com com Fax: 208-947-1655 Subject Property Information Location/street address: NE comer of Fairview Avenue & Eagle Road Assessor's parcel number(s): S1104314800 and S1104438620 Township, range, section: Township 3N, Range IE Total acreage: 60.0 acres Current land use: Agriculture Current zoning district: Rural Urban Transition (RUT) 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity-org I (Ren 11/4108) Project Description Project/subdivision name: Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park General description of proposed project/request: Developing a 60 -acre park as a memorial to Mr. Julius Kldiner, and donate to the City of Meridian as a City park. Proposed zoning district(s): Acres of each zone proposed: 60.0 acres Type of use proposed (check all that apply): ❑ Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Office ❑ Industrial 0 Other City Park Amenities provided with this development (if applicable): LibrarySenior Center Picnic Shelters, Rec Complex Who will own & maintain the pressurized irrigation system in this development? City of Meridian Which irrigation district does this property lie within? Nampa Meridian Irrigation District Primary irrigation source: Surface Water Secondary: Groundwater Square footage of landscaped areas to be irrigated (if primary of secondary point of connection is City water): Residential Project Summary (if applicable) Number of residential units: Number of building lots: Number of common and/or other lots: Proposed number of dwelling units (for multi -family developments only): 1 Bedroom: 2 or more Bedrooms: Minimum square footage of structures) (excl. garage): Proposed building height: Minimum property size (s.f): _ Gross density (DU/acre-total land): Percentage of open space provided: Average property size (s.f.): Net density (DU/acre-excluding roads & alleys): Acreage of open space: Percentage of useable open space: (See Chapter 3, Article G, for qualified open space) Type of open space provided in acres (i.e., landscaping, public, common, etc): Type of dwelling(s) proposed: ❑ Single-family ❑ Townhomes ❑ Duplexes ❑ Multi -family Non-residential Project Summary (if applicable) Number of building lots: Other lots: Gross floor area proposed: Existing (if applicable): Hours of operation (days and hours): Building height: Percentage of site/project devoted to the following: Landscaping: Building. Paving: Total number of employees: Maximum number of employees at any one time: Number and ages of students/children (if applicable): Total number of parking spaces provided: Authorization Print applicant name: .7� Applicant signature: r Phone: (2 8 Seating capacity: Number of compact spaces provided: t Date: 03/11/10 33 E. BroadJy Avenue, ite 210 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 884-5533 • Facsimile. 208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org 2 JohnsorrArchitects jA PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION r/ March 31, 2010 Sonya Watters City of Meridian Planning and Zoning 33 E. Broadway Meridian, ID 83642 RE: Design Review Narrative Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park (Park Structures) — Meridian, Idaho Sonya: As part of this overall Certificate of Zoning / Design Review application, we are submitting for your review and approval, the proposed design solutions for the various structures to belocated throughout the Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park. The purpose of this narrative is to address how the design of these structures complies with the guidelines set forth in the Meridian Design Manual and UDC 11-3A-19. This narrative addresses the following structures (see structures): • Trash Enclosures (where occurs) • . Entry Feature • Signature Picnic Facility (Typ. of 2 Locations) • Small Restroom (Typ. of 2 Locations) • Large Restroom • Concessions • . Band Shell • , Maintenance Building Site Plan fumished by Paramebix for location of Architectural Character / Color and Materials: The primary architectural characteristic of each of these Park structures is revealed in its simplicity, timelessness, and sustainability in form and in the use of materials and colors. The form and mass of each structure, in general, are quite simple. The interest is created through the use of texture and color of the materials, such as a ground face c.m.u. (exposing aggregate) or a rust -color weathered steel decorative panel. These materials and colors are intended to complement the structures with this natural surrounding; not to hide them or overly accentuate them. They were also considered, because they will withstand the test of time better than other similar options. While each structure is unique in its function, each will employ materials from a common palette and incorporate repeating design elements, thus esthetically connecting each to one another. The proposed material palette is as follows: • . Ground -face CMU (Basalite 615) • Weathered steel (sealed) — decorative panels • Prefinished or painted steel • Parklex (or sim.) high density stratified timber panel • Standing seam metal roofing system with a natural Galvalume finish (all roofs) 440 E Corporate Drive, Suite 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642 r (208) 846 9033 F (208) 846 9475 w www.johnsonarchitects.com Site Plan and Building Locations: By Parametrix under separate application. We believe this application is consistent with the design guidelines set forth in the Meridian Design Manual — C. Urban/Suburban. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding this application. Sinc el Y, alte dgren AIA, Principal Architect JOH ARCHITECTS, PC Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Project Narrative The Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park is a 60 -acre urban park located to the northeast of the Fairview Avenue/Eagle Road intersection. The Kleiner Park Trust is designing and developing the park that will be deeded to the city upon construction completion as a public Meridian City Park. The Kleiner Park Trust, lead by Julius' son, Eugene Kleiner, is intended to be a legacy in honor of Julius, who escaped from Bolshevik, Russia to the United States in the early 1900's. The park has two large ponds, rolling hills, an arboretum with labyrinth, an active recreation area with decorative splash pad, and an abundance of trees. The site also includes a civic complex featuring a new Meridian Branch Library and Senior Center. The park provides over 3 Y2 miles of pedestrian pathways, and a loop roadway system with a bike lane. The Grand Promenade and Memorial Plaza are the signature park amenities, with colored concrete, pavers, ornamental pedestrian lighting, benches and a bronze statue honoring local businessman and gentleman farmer Julius M. Kleiner. The Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Master Plan was approved by the Meridian City Council on August 18, 2009. A development agreement modification was approved for the park property by the Meridian City Council on March 2, 2010. The Development Agreement and annexation ordinance were approved by the Meridian City Council on March 9, 2010. A property boundary adjustment may be added to the park, to include tax lot #S1104314800. The lot is currently part of the Redfeather Subdivision, and would add approximately 1.25 acres to the park site. The plans included in this application reflect the additional 1.25 acres. However, if for some reason, the property boundary adjustment does not occur, the overall site plan for the park will not be impacted. For purposes of this Certificate of Zoning Compliance application, we are requesting approval of the overall park site. We have forgone providing final planting and photometric lighting plans in this submittal with the understanding that design has not progressed to that point. When design of these elements is completed, we will provide these documents to the City as a condition of approval. In addition, separate CZC applications will be submitted in the future for the ancillary structures, library and senior center. On March 11, 2010, the Sanitary Service Company approved the cover sheet of the full-size site plan for this submittal. However, minor changes were made to the cover sheet following that approval, and a copy of the original cover sheet is . included with this application. The overall site plan was discussed with Rick Jackson on March 11, 2010, for the Fire Marshall approval. Rick cannot approve any modifications to the International Fire Code. The lane widths in and out of the roundabout on the loop road are less than 20', which is a variation to the IFC. However, the lane widths designed are necessary for a functional roundabout design. Joe Silva is authorized to approve the modifications to the IFC, but was out of town on the 11th and will not return until the 15th. Joe will have a copy of the site plan for his review upon his return. PARAMETRIX 3/11/2010 Page 1 of 1 1m1 :1 i Meridian Development Services E IDIAN),!-_r--- Meridian City Nall, Suite 102 i o 0 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 PW100 FORM Ph: (208) 887-2211: Fax: (208) 887-1297' www. merid iancity.org! Date: 3/4/10 The following property has been researched by The City of Meridian Public Works Department. Project Name: JULIUS M. KLEINER MEMORIAL PARK Address: 1900 N. Records Ave. Suite #: Zip Code: 83646 Lot/Block Subdivision: 1) The address has been assigned based on available information. This address should be considered temporary (Development process has not been completed, so the address may change) 2) This address will be required to connect to municipal services. Water and Sewer mains are available for connection to the Municipal System. This property does not currently have services available. (Development process has not been completed) 3) This Is an existing structure that is connected to. municipal services. EACH SET OF PLANS WILL BE REQUIRED TO CLEARLY REFLECT THE CORRECT ADDRESS AND SUITE NUMBER (IF APPLICABLE). Terri Ricks Land Development Services tricks@meridiancity.org Planning Department DESIGN REVIEW Design Manual Compliance Project name: Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park File' #: Applicant/agent: Steve SiddoWay, Meridian Parks & Recreation t ' Objective: To encourage integrated, functional, and attractive transitional developments that strengthen identity within the City and support urban and mixed-use areas. Y N N/A d.Design Guidelines' '.Comments : Staff X C-1.1.3.1. Developments should establish an appropriate and compatible transitional development... X C-1.1.3.1.1. Develop a master plan for large-scale, phased, and multiple -site proposals to demonstrate... X C-1.1.3.1.2. Where appropriate, coordinate with adjacent uses and residential areas, including single -project... X C-1.1.3.1.3. Avoid piecemeal and fragmented development that detracts from the establishment... X C-1.1.3.1.4. Reduce and mitigate the impacts from proposed developments on adjacent sites as... X C-1.1.3.1.5. Mixed-use, large-scale, and multiple -site developments should integrate public space within... XC-1.7.3.2. Anticipate the addition of future transit systems to the transportation network and plan for... XC-1.1.3.2.1. Coordinate routes, placement of facilities, and infrastructure improvements with the appropriate... X C-1.1.3.3,3 Where possible, incorporate and enhance "significant natural features as site amenities and/or... X C-1.1.3.4. Appropriately address the critical issues of site layout that influence development character... I'Obiectives: I I To promote the interconnectivity of the community and reduce the impacts that vehicle access points impose on roadways and the physical and visual character of developments. I See corresponding item in the Design Manual far full text. 2 Insert comments or exploitations relerant to the projects compliance or no-conipliance. 3 Incorporating this guideline may help offset non-compliance with other guidelines. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org 1-25-2010) Y N N/A :Design Guidelines Comments Staff C-1.2.3.1. Limit direct vehicular access off major X roadways, including highways, principal arterials... C-1.2.3.1.1. Coordinate and combine access points X with adjacent sites and uses to reduce or eliminate... XC-1.2.3.1.2. Provide site ingress/egress from secondary roadways for sites adjacent to major roadways. C-1.2.3.1.3. Where secondary roadways cannot be X provided, coordinate and combine access points to... C-1.2.3.1.4. Multiple-site and large-scale developments X should limit ingress/egress points and establish... C-1.2.3.1.5. Use shared access points, secondary X roadways, or internal circulation to access corner sites. C-1.2.3.2. Provide pedestrian and vehicular X connections that link adjacent uses and circulation... C-1.2.3.2.1. Where possible, coordinate and align X ingress/egress points, cross access, and internal... C-1.2.3.2.2. Unrestricted access points and roadways X used for site entry should align across primary... C-1.2,3.2.3.3 Multiple pedestrian routes should.:_ X converge on public and open spaces, such as transit... C-1.2.3.3. Establish internal site circulation as an X interconnected network of walkways, pathways... XC-1.2.3.4. Plan for access and connectivity to future transit facilities, including, but not limited to... X C-1.2.3.4.1. Coordinate with the appropriate agencies and organizations to ensure the successful... Xfrom C-1,2,3.4.2.3 Provide adequate pedestrian connections public spaces, building entries, and parking... ® o tINEMMENEMEMEEM Objectives:' To ensure that site organization, including, but not limited to, the placement and orientation of buildings, structures, and public spaces, as well as the location and layout of service and parking areas, promotes an integrated built environment that establishes an appropriate development character. Y N N/A Design Guidelines '•Comments2- Staff C-1.3.2.1. Locate buildings to establish an appropriate X development character that enhances the... C-1.3.2.1.1. Bring buildings up close to roadways to X establish a street presence and orient primary... C-1.3.2.1.2. Limit the distance from buildings to X roadways and the distance between buildings... Xdevelopments C-1.3.2.1.3. Large-scale and multibuilding from... may place buildings away I See corresponding item in the Design Manual for frdl text. 2 Insert conmtents or explanations relevant to fixe projects compliance or non-compliance. 3 Incotporating this guideline nwy help offset non-compliance with other guidelines. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org Y N N/A DesignGuidelinesr Comments2 Staff Xfagades C-1.3.2.1.4.3 Use buildings that incorporate articulated and architectural elements to anchor site... C-1.3.2.2. Provide clearly defined building entries and X connect them to roadways, pedestrian walkways... X C-1.3.2.2.1. Primary building entries should face roadways, pedestrian environments, or adjacent... X C-1.3.2.2.2. Large-scale buildings should provide entrances on at least two different building fariades... C-1.3.2.3. Strategically locate public spaces and site X amenities, such as common open space, transit... C-1.3.2.3.1. Organize buildings around public space X and site amenities to establish destinations that... X C-1.3.2.3.2.3 Use building fagades, enhanced ` streetscapes, or other appropriate enhancements to... xv C-1.3.2.3.3. Orient public spaces and site amenities toward roadways adjacent to building entries... X C 1.3.2.3.4.3 Spaces designed for courtyards, outdoor seating, dining areas, or other such. spaces should... C-1.3.2.4. Locate parking toward the interior of the site X and integrate parking areas to establish an attractive... C-1.3.2.4.1. Place parking areas away from site NyVi WAS, `�� a X corners, primarily to the rear and/or side of buildings... Ark ve' ?'OA C+ C-1.3.2.4.2. Use a parking strategy to minimize the VV'r X land area devoted to vehicular parking; include... Vve �br ° C-1.3.2.4.3. Distribute parking into smaller areas X wound, between, and behind structures to shorten the... C-1.3.2.5. Where possible, coordinate the placement of X public spaces, site amenities, parking areas, and/or... C-1.3.2.6. Locate site services, building utilities, and x mechanical equipment to enhance the attractiveness... C-1.3.2.6.1. Place and orient service and loading areas, x mechanical equipment, and utilities away from... X C-1.3.2.6.2. Where possible, place service and loading areas behind buildings and provide access from... C-1.3.2.6.3. Coordinate the placement of freestanding X site services and mechanical equipment to eliminate... Xfrom C-1.3.2.6.4. Place utility lines underground and away planting zones whenever possible. I See corresponding item in the Design Manua( for fid! test. 2 Insert comments or explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-compliance. 3 Incorporating this guideline may help offset non-compliance with other guidelines. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org To incorporate parking as an integrated element of the built environment and address issues that influence the location for size of parking physical and visual characteristics of parking areas, such as the appropriate parking, areas, paving materials, landscaping, and screening. Staff 1. Y N N/A Design Guidelines Comments2 C-1.4.3.1. Parking areas should establish an X appropriate circulation pattern for pedestrians and... C-1,4.3.1.1. Coordinate vehicular and pedestrian X circulation patterns to delineate pedestrian walkways... C-1.4.3.1.2. Provide pedestrian connections from X internal circulation to public spaces and adjacent... C-1.4.3.2. Design surface parking as an integrated and X attractive element of the built environment that... C-1..4.3.2.1. Break up parking areas into smaller, X separated modules and arrange parking to minimize... C-1.4.3.2.2. Reduce the depth of parking areas and X limit parking between building fagades and... C-1.4.3.2.3. The design and layout of internal site X parking should avoid long, unbroken parking bays... C-1.4.3.2.4. Use trees, landscaping, hardscapes, and X architectural elements to provide shade, create... C-1.4.3.2.5.' Shade pedestrian walkways and parking, X `including stalls and drive aisles, with the appropriate... C-1.4.3.2.6.' Screen parking with berms, landscaping, X walls, architectural elements, or a co mbinationto... C-1.4.3.2.7. Distribute and integrate appropriately X scaled lighting to provide safe and adequately... C-1.4.3.3. Where appropriate, incorporate and arrange X on -street parking to produce traffic calming effects... C-1.4.3.3.1. Coordinate the use of on -street parking, X including the design and location, with the... C-1.4.3.3.2.' Internal roadways are encouraged to use X on -street. parking that is integrated. withstreetscapes... C.1.4.3.3.3.' Where on -street parking is provided or X where vehicles are circulation is directed in front of... - X' C-1.4.3.4.3 Structured parking facilities are encouraged and should be designed to coordinate vehicular-. t Objective: To provide a variety of attractive, usable, and integrated public and open spaces that enhance development character, encourage pedestrian use, and contribute to community life and the positive experience of daily activities. Staff Y N Ntign Guidelines Comments2 X .5.3.1. Design public and open spaces as inations within individual developments and... I See corresponding item in the Design Manual for fidl text - 2 Insert comments m explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-earnpliance. ' lncotporatirtg this guideline nuoy help offvetnon-compliance with other guidelines. 33 B. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org Y N X C-1.5.3.1.1. Provide appropriate types and sizes of Comments2 Staff I Design Guidelines' Comments XC-1.5.3.1.2. public and open spaces, including development... X Y N IIIS Design Guidelines' Comments2 Staff I Design Guidelines' Comments XC-1.5.3.1.2. Clearly delineate the edges of public X C-1.6.2.1. Use an organizational strategy for landscape plantings to promote aesthetic compositions that... Al WVAA5Ctt?fn j piaw6 vtc lt 6a sqioamoiifea Ohle 4lV%Ai , spaces. Use building facades, materials, architectural... XC-1.6.2.1.1 ° Use formal planting arrangements, such as regular and linear intervals and geometric patterns... XC-1.5.3.1.3.3 Where appropriate, place public and open XC-1.6.2.1.2.°Use informal planting arrangements, such as irregular intervals, random patterns, and... ...spaces adjacent or in close proximity to transit... X X C-1.5.3.1.4. Design public spaces to provide visual XC -1.6.2.2.1. Use appropriate classes of trees for urban environments and streetscapes. Consider height and... interest that enhances development character and... XC-1.5.3.1.5. Where appropriate, use public and open spaces as transitions between land uses to promote... X C-1.5.3.2. Incorporate pedestrian -oriented amenities that promote various active and passive uses within... X C-1.5.3.2.1. Use decorative pavers or other materials suitable for hardscapes that endure well and add... X C-1.5.3.2.2. Incorporate plantings, trees, and other plant materials to add vertical texture and variety to public... X C-1.5.3.2.3. Provide adequate seating that reflects the nature of the intended activities. Use fixed seating... C-1.5.3.2.4; Introduce. public art as'.anintegral part of [. X the public realm. As appropriate, incorporate... XC-1.5.3.2.5.3 Include decorative details and elements, such as banners, flags,. signs, and planters, which... X C-1.5.3.2.6. Where appropriate, provide pedestrian- scaledlight fixtures that provide adequate lighting... X C-1.5.3.3. Public and open spaces should maintain pedestrian and user safety and provide secure... N ii Objective: To encourage the attractive and purposeful use of plants and other landscape materials that enhance development character, including public and open space, parking, required buffers, and pedestrian environments. Y N I N/A I Design Guidelines' Comments Staff - X C-1.6.2.1. Use an organizational strategy for landscape plantings to promote aesthetic compositions that... Al WVAA5Ctt?fn j piaw6 vtc lt 6a sqioamoiifea Ohle 4lV%Ai , XC-1.6.2.1.1 ° Use formal planting arrangements, such as regular and linear intervals and geometric patterns... XC-1.6.2.1.2.°Use informal planting arrangements, such as irregular intervals, random patterns, and... X C-1.6.2.2. Integrate landscaping as appropriate to establish a consistent appearance and aesthetic... XC -1.6.2.2.1. Use appropriate classes of trees for urban environments and streetscapes. Consider height and... I See corresponding item in the Design Manual for,Jidl text. 2 Inset It comments or explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-compliance. 3 Incotporating this guideline may help offset non-compliance with other guidelines. 4 Appropriately use formal and/or informal platting arrangements to meet the guideline. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.merldiancity.org Y N N/A Design Guidelines' Comments2 Staff Comments ` Staff XC-1.6.2.2.3. Incorporate various plants and non - C-2.1.3.1. Building designs should appropriately Nb ffi eas h vegetative materials that provide groundcover and... X address building scale, mass, and form, and the use... 'ov%. X C-1.6.2.2.4.3 Use planters and planting arrangements X C-2.1.3.2. Use fundamental design principles, what feature seasonal plants, flowers, and ornamental... including, but not limited to, composition, order... X C-1.6.2.3? Where appropriate or advantageous to XC-2.1.3.3. Design building fagades that express pedestrian activity, integrate streetscape... architectural character and incorporate the use of... tfx-promote C-1.6.2.4. Where possible, development should X C-2.1.3.3.1. Design all appropriate sides of buildings, coordinate landscaping with adjacent properties to... including faeades that face public roadways, public... ecrve. To encourage visually aesthetic building designs that promote quality architectural character and establish built environments that are compatible with existing, planned, and/or anticipated adjacent land uses. Y N N/A Design Guidelines' Comments ` Staff C-2.1.3.1. Building designs should appropriately Nb ffi eas h X address building scale, mass, and form, and the use... 'ov%. X C-2.1.3.2. Use fundamental design principles, including, but not limited to, composition, order... XC-2.1.3.3. Design building fagades that express architectural character and incorporate the use of... X C-2.1.3.3.1. Design all appropriate sides of buildings, including faeades that face public roadways, public... X C-2.1.3.4. Building design should enhance public and opens spaces, articulate aesthetic character, and... X C-2.1.3.4.1. Design buildings to enhance the attractiveness and appeal of developments, define... X C-2.1.3.4.2. Where appropriate, incorporate human and pedestrian scale as integral components of the... X C-2.1.3.5. Use building design and architecture to Use promote and denser developments as... JX— C-2.13.5:1 s Building designs are encouraged to use horizontal... vertically. integrated structures and/or ' See corresponding item in the Design Manual for fidl test. 2 Insert continents m' explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-compliance. 3 Incorporating this guideline ntay help offset non-carnphance with other guidelines. 5 Incanporatnng vertically integrated uses may help offset non-compliance with other guidelines. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meddiancity.org To encourage building designs that appropriately use architectural and human scale to establish compatible physical and visual relationships with adjacent and surrounding developments and reinforce a cohesive architectural character. Y N N/A 'Design Guidelines' Comments2 i Staff xv C-2.2.2.1. Proposed developments should use proportion and scale to design buildings compatible... X C-2.2.2.1.1. Infill, greenfield, and redevelopment proposals should coordinate the placement... Xdevelopments C-2.2.2.1.2. Large-scale and multibuilding innovative... are encouraged to produce X C-2.2.2.1.3. Where possible, group or incorporate smaller uses along fayades that introduce modulation... XC-2.2.2.2. Design and configure buildings to reduce overwhelming and disproportioned architectural... C-2.2.2.2.1. Development should consider the scale of X surrounding buildings, including relationships to... X C-2.2.2.2.2. Use variation in building form and but proximity to other buildings, including, not... C-2.2.2.2.3. Where appropriate, establish a hierarchy of Xbuilding scales that transition from intense to less... Xadjacent C-2.2.2.2.4. Building scales along roadways and are... to or near urban areas of the community Xbuilding C-2.2.2.3. Incorporate human scale on appropriate fagades to support an aesthetic architectural... X C-2.2.2.3.1. Use human scale to emphasize fenestration patterns, architectural elements, proportion... Human scale is required at the ground or street level at building entries, along roadways, and... t Objective: To enhance the visual interest of building designs and promote quality architectural character. Y N N/A Design Guidelines Comments2i Staff Xlimited C-2.3.2.1. Articulate building forms, including, but not to, massing, walls, and roofs, with... XC-2.3.2.1.1. Building fagades that face roadways, public spaces, and pedestrian environments should... Xbuildings C-2.3.2.1.2. Design parking structures as integrated that are compatible with surrounding uses... X C-2.3.2.1.3. Parking structures should incorporate modulations, architectural elements, details... X C-2.3.2.2. Incorporate visual and physical distinctions building forms... in the building design that enhance I See corresponding item in the Design Manual for fill text. 2 Insert cmnments or explanations relevant to the pt'ojects compliance oe nos-conipllmme. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org ' See corresponding item in the Design Manual far full text. 2 Insect comments or explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-compliance. 3 Incorporating this guideline may help offset non-compliance with other guidelines. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org Objective: X C-2.3.2.2.1. Use divisions, fenestration, architectural elements, details, accent materials, and human scale... scale. Y N. N/A XC-2.3.2.2.2. Where building designs incorporate multiple stories, or equivalent building heights... Staff." Y N N/A Design Guidelines' Comments2 -' Staff XC-2.4.2.1.1. XC-2.3.2.2.3. Use horizontal and vertical divisions in wall planes to organize fenestration as integrated... XC-2.4.2.1.2. XC-2.3.2.2.4. Design lower stories to visually anchor buildings to the ground or street and appropriately... X XC-2.3.2.2.5. Design the uppermost story or fagade, wall planes to complete the building design. Use articulation... XI X C-2.3.2.2.6. Building designs within designated areas of the Ten Mile Specific Area Plan are encouraged to use... X C-2.3.2.3. Building designs should establish visual connections that relate internal spaces at ground- or... X C-2.3.2.3.1. Use architectural elements, such as doors and windows, details, and materials to articulate building... XC-2.3.2.3.2. Fagades at ground level should average 40 percent transparency along roadways and adjacent to... X C-2.3.2.4. Building designs should provide proportionally taller ground -level fagades to accommodate various... XC-2.3.2.5. Building roof types, forms, and elements should provide variation and interest to building... XC-2.3.2.5.1. Building designs should incorporate appropriate roof forms with primary and secondary... XC-2.3.2.5.2. Where appropriate, modulate and/or articulate roof types, both flat and sloped, with roof... ' See corresponding item in the Design Manual far full text. 2 Insect comments or explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-compliance. 3 Incorporating this guideline may help offset non-compliance with other guidelines. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org Objective: To integrate architectural elements and details as components of cohesive building designs that enhance the To visual interest of building fagades, support activity at and/or near ground level, and provide human and pedestrian scale. Y N. N/A Design Guidelines' : [Comments 2.: Staff." X C-2.4.2.1. Use architectural elements and detailing, including, but not limited to, fenestration pattern... XC-2.4.2.1.1. Design and articulate architectural elements using proportions, divisions, detailing... XC-2.4.2.1.2. Provide architectural elements and detailing that emphasize human scale throughout the... X C-2.4.2.1.3.3 Where appropriate, provide building .overhangs or other similar features, such as canopies.... XI C-2.4.2.1.4.3 Integrate.. strategically located elements as focal points in building designs. Focal elements.:. ' See corresponding item in the Design Manual far full text. 2 Insect comments or explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-compliance. 3 Incorporating this guideline may help offset non-compliance with other guidelines. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org C-2.4.2.2. Building designs should not create blank wall X segments along roadways or adjacent to public space... XC-2.4.2.3. Organize and locate building service equipment, including, but not limited to, mechanical... Y N N/A Design Ouidelinesi Comments z Staff X C-2.4.2.3.1. Use integrated architectural elements to provide adequate screening and appropriately... X C-2.4.2.3.2. Screen service equipment at ground level from pedestrian and vehicular view to a minimum... XC-2.4.2.3.3. Screen service and building equipment that is attached or on top of structures from public view... XC-2.4.2.3.4. Use screening techniques, architectural elements, and materials that are consistent with the... Objective: To encourage the use of quality materials that promote aesthetic building designs and appropriate contributions to the development of a timeless community, character. Y N N/A' Design Guidelines` Comments Z-' Staff' XC-2.5.2.1. Buildings with fagades that face multiple roadways and/or public spaces should use consistent... XC-2.5.2.2. Use complementary material combinations that contribute to a cohesive building design... XC-2.5.2.2.1. Select combinations that emphasize a finished composition and enhance human scale for... XC-2.5.2.2.2. Concrete masonry that provides texture, interest, and detail may be appropriate for building... XC-2.5.2.2.3. Use well -detailed, proportioned, and durable materials that will weather and age gracefully... X C-2.5.2.2.4. Create interest and variety in fagade design to establish attractive architectural character and... X C-2.5.2.2.5. Provide pattern, texture, and detail in the building design and distinguish field materials from... XC-2.5.2.3. Where materials transition or terminate, provide detailing to express the natural appearance... XC-2.5.2.4. Use colors that complement the use of building materials and support innovative and good... XC-2.5.2.4.1. The use of subtle, neutral, and natural tones for field materials should complement accent... X C-2.5.2.4.2. The use of intensely bright and fluorescent colors, as well as the widespread use of saturated... X C-2.5.2.4.3. Materials or colors with high reflectance, such as metal or reflective glazing, should be... I See corresponding item in the Design Manual for fid! text. 2 Insert comments or explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-compliance. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 9 Website: www.meridiancity.org `Objective:. To encourage the use of signs and architectural lighting as integrated elements of building and site designs that contribute to the atmosphere of quality, aesthetic built environments. Y N N/A : Design Guidelines' Comments2 j Staff , N N/A XC-2.6.3.1. Where appropriate, use lighting on building exteriors to promote safe pedestrian environments... Staff - XC-3.1.3.1. XC-2.6.3.1.1. Coordinate lighting fixture spacing and height along streetscapes and roadways to avoid... XC-2.6.3.1.2.3 The use of architectural lighting is encouraged to be energy-efficient and easily... XC-3.1.3.2. XC-2.6.3.1.3. Lighting fixtures used on building exteriors should be integrated with building design... XC-2.6.3.2. Signs should be integrated with architectural elements and complement building designs and... X XC-2.6.3.2.1. Provide signs to identify individual storefronts, buildings, and uses along roadways... X - C-2.6.3.2.2.3 Use corporate and business logos to identify. developments and businesses along... - X XC-2.6.3.2.3. Use appropriately scaled signs that incorporate logos, minimize or eliminate the use of... XC-2.6.3.2.4. Where buildings are brought up close to roadways, pedestrian environments, and public... XC-2.6.3.2.5.3 Decorative flags and banners should -promote the: identity: of place and enhance the... e .Objective: To promote the appropriate use of site layout, separation techniques, and architectural design guidelines to mitigate the adverse impacts that industrial uses impose on adjacent commercial, residential, and other non- industrial uses. Y N N/A -Design Guidelines `. Comments2 Staff - XC-3.1.3.1. Orient industrial developments, including buildings, structures, and site elements, such as work... XC-3.1.3.2. Provide an appropriate architectural design for buildings and structures that are adjacent to... X C-3.1.3.3. Use the placement and orientation of the building or structure to screen industrial activity... X C-3.1.3.4. Maintain the required buffers adjacent to non-residential uses as indicated in the UDC... I See corresponding item of the Design Manual forfidl text. 2 Insert continents or explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-compliance. 3 Incorporating this guideline may help offset non-compliance with other guidelines. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org t 1 '.:Objective::' To accommodate the adaptive reuse of the existing residence to a commercial use, while maintaining compatibility with the use(s) on adjoining properties. To ensure that such residential to commercial conversions are compatible with the existing character of the original residential use, while recognizing the need to modify the structure to meet commercial building code requirements. '.Y NIN/Al Design Guidelines' Commentsz - `Staff - XC-3.2.3.1. Developments that propose the conversion of residential to commercial within Old Town should... XC-3.2.3.2. Residential to commercial conversions should use the guidelines from Section C. Design... XC -3.2.3.3. Additions, restorations, and repairs should use similar building forms, materials, and details... XC-3.2.3.4. Where there are site constraints that prevent a conversion from complying with the site character... ' See eorresponding item in the Design Manual forfidl test. 2Insert comments or explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-compliance. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 0 Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 0 Website: www.moridiancity.org Planning Department CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE Application Checklist All applications are required to contain one copy of the following unless otherwise noted: Applicant Description Staff (4) (4) Completed & signed Administrative Review Application Narrative fully describing the proposed use of the property, including the following: V/ ➢ Information on any previous approvals or requirements for the requested use (i.e., applicable conditions of approval or Development Agreement) Recorded warranty deed for the subject property Affidavit of legal Interest signed & notarized by the property owner (if owner is a corporation, submit a covy of the Articles of incorporation or other evidence to show that the 2eason signing is an authorized a ent.) Scaled vicinity map showing the location of the subject property Fire Marshall apyroval for access and turn around (stamped, full size site plan) V/ Sanitary Service Company approval for trash enclosure & access drive (stamped, full size site Ian) Civil Site/Dimension Plan — 1 full size coy (folded to 81/z" x 11" size) A photometric test report for any light fixtures) with a maximum output of 1,800 lumens or more (see UDC 11-3A-11) Copy of the recorded plat the property lies within (81/2" x 11") RecorA Address verification letter from Public Works (898-5500) Site Plan -4 copies (folded to 81/z" x 11" size) The following items must be shown on the siteplan: • Date, scale, north arrow, and project name (scale not less than V=50') Names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the developer and the person and/or firm preparing the plan • Parking stalls and drive aisles • Trash enclosure(s) location • Detail of trash enclosure (must be screened on 3 sides) • Location and specifications for underground irrigation (Pressurized irrigation can only be waived if you Piave no water rights exist to subject ro ert) OR a6A& S #4667 • Sidewalks or pathways (proposed and existing) • Location of proposed building on lot (include dimensions to property lines) • Fencing (proposed and existing) • Calculations table including the following: ➢ Number of parking stalls required & provided (specify handicap & compact stalls) ➢ Building size (sq. ft.) ➢ Lot size (sq. ft.) ➢ Setbacks ➢ Zoning district • Reduction of the site plan (8 t/z" x 11") Landscape plan — 3 copies (folded to 8 ''/2" x 11" size) Plan must have a scale no smaller than I" = 50' (1" = 20' is preferred) and be on a standard 'TOD drawing sheet, not to exceed 36" x 48" (24" x 36" is preferred), A plan rvhich cannot be drarmt in its entirety an a single sheet mast be drawn with appropriate match lines on ova or more sheets. The following items must be included on the landscapeplan: • Date, scale, north arrow, and project name 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org 0 ACHD Acceptance: Applicmttshall be responsible for meeting fire requirements ofACHD as they pertain to this application. All inipactfees, if any, shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building pennit. If any changes must be made to the site plait to accommodate the ACRD requirements, a new site plan shall be submitted to the City of Meridian Planning & Zoning Department for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit Your building permit will not be issued until ACHD has approved your plans and all associated fees have been paid THIS APPLICATION SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE UNTIL STAFF HAS RECEIVED ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION. 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org (Rev. 4103109) • Names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the developer and the person and/or firm preparing the plan • Stamp/signature of a landscape architect, landscape designer, or qualified nurseryman preparing the plan ota rlmm— • Existing natural features such as canals, creeks, drains, ponds, wetlands, flood Tains, high groundwater areas, and rock outcro in s • Location, size, and species of all existing trees on site with trunks 4 inches or $f greater in diameter, measured 6 inches above the ground. Indicate whether the tree will be retained or removed f4ONE 001 PA100`&XrJ �B A statement of how existing healthy trees proposed to be retained will be protected from damage during construction • Existing structures, planting areas, light poles, power poles, walls, fences, berms, Wfk parking and loading areas, vehicular drives, trash areas, sidewalks, pathways, NatNk stormwater detention areas, signs, street furniture, and other man-made elements • Existing and proposed contours for all areas steeper than 20% slope. Berms shall be shown with one -foot contours • Sight Triangles as defined in 11-3A-5 of this ordinance ao 64r# tAm • Location and labels for all proposed plants, including trees, shrubs, and groundcovers (trees must not beplan[ed in City water or sewer easements). Scale shown for Tani materials shall reflect approximate mature size • A plant list that shows the plant symbol, quantity, botanical name, common name, minimum planting size and container, tree class (I, II, or III), and comments (for spacing, staking, and installation as appropriate) • Planting and installation details as necessary to ensure conformance with all required standards • Design drawing(s) of all fencing proposed for screening purposes • Calculations of project components to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this ordinance, including: ➢ Number of street trees and lineal feet of street frontage ➢ Width of street buffers (exclusive of right-of-way) Y Width of parking lot perimeter landscape strip ➢ Buffer width between different land uses (if applicable) ➢ Number of parking stalls and percent of parking area with internal landscaping ➢ Total number of trees and tree species mix Y Mitigation for removal of existing trees, including number of caliper inches being removed j Reduction of the landscape plan (8 t/z" x I1") Building elevations showing construction materials — 3 copies (folded to 8 t/z" x 11" size) Reduction of the elevations (8 t/z" x 1 P) If applying for approval of a public school, provide additional information as required by f the Public School Facility supplemental checklist per §67-6519 Fee (If this project had prior a2proval on a site plan, reduced fees may apply) ACHD Acceptance: Applicmttshall be responsible for meeting fire requirements ofACHD as they pertain to this application. All inipactfees, if any, shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building pennit. If any changes must be made to the site plait to accommodate the ACRD requirements, a new site plan shall be submitted to the City of Meridian Planning & Zoning Department for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit Your building permit will not be issued until ACHD has approved your plans and all associated fees have been paid THIS APPLICATION SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE UNTIL STAFF HAS RECEIVED ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION. 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org (Rev. 4103109) Planning Department DESIGN REVIEW ■ Application Checklist Project name:iA lW & gkWyww o 'vtl to Concurrent File #: Applicant/agent: CAU t ld(.Khla. ' me.r161P. cz, All applications are required to contain one copy of the following: Applicant - Description Staff Completed and signed Administrative Review Application (If also submitting a concurrent application for Conditional Use Permit, design review will be processed along with that application. Therefore, air Administrative Review application is not necessary in this case; just check the Design Review box on Commission &Council Review Application and submit the information below.) Completed Design Manual Compliance Checklists (B. Urban Design Guidelines; ✓ C. Urban/Suburban Design Guidelines; D. Suburban Design Guidelines; E. Residential Design Guidelines) as applicable, Provide in a narrative letter, how the proposal addresses guidelines contained in the Meridian Design Manual and UDC 11-3A-19: 1. Architectural Character: a. Facades. b. Primary public entrance(s). c. Roof lines. d. Pattern variations. e. Fenestration I. Mechanical equipment: All ground -level and rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened to the height of the unit as viewed from the property line. 2. Color and materials. Please provide color chips or exhibits of proposed colors. 3. Site Plan and Building Layout a. Building location b. Parking areas. c. Access d. Street layout and/or internal circulation. e. Pedestrian walkways and facilities. A complete set of scaled plans including building elevations, with building materials, colors and textures specified and site plans. Reductions of the elevations (8'h" x 11") Fee All requests far design review approval must meet the procedures set forth in UDC 11 -5 and the criteria set forth in the "Meridian Design Manual ", as applicable. APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BEA CCEPTED UNLESS ALL APPLICABLE ITEMS ON THE CHECKLIST ARE SUBMITTED. 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridimeity.org (Rev. 1214108) CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE REPORT DATE: March 26, 2010 TO: Steve Siddoway, Meridian Parks & Recreation FROM: Sonya Watters, Associate City Planner SUBJECT: Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park — CZC-10-018/DES-10-012 OWNER: Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST The applicant, Steve Siddoway, Meridian Parks & Recreation, requests Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) and Design Review (DES) approval for the development of a 60 acre park to be donated to the City of Meridian as a City park. The site is located off the north east corner of E. Fairview Avenue and N. Eagle Road. DECISION The applicant's request for CZC & DES is approved with the conditions listed in this report. Note: This is not a building permit. Prior to any construction, you should contact Building Services at (208)887-2211 to verify if any additional permits and/or inspections will be required. Site Specific Conditions of Approval The applicant shall construct all proposed fencing and/or any fencing required by the UDC, consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7 and 11 -3A -6B. 2. The landscape plan prepared by Parametrix on March 10, 2010, labeled Sheets LS1-4 is approved (stamped "approved" on March 26, 2010 by the City of Meridian Planning Department) with the following changes: a. Include bicycle parking in accord with UDC 11 -3C -6G and 11 -3C -5C. b. Include details for proposed fencing. The landscape plan shall not be altered without prior written approval of the City of Meridian Planning Department 3. A detailed final landscape plan is required to be submitted within 6 months of the date of this approval. 4. The site plan prepared by Parametrix on March 10, 2010, labeled Sheets 1-5, is approved (stamped "approved" on March 26, 2010 by the City of Meridian Planning Department) with the following changes: a. Include bicycle parking in accord with UDC 11 -3C -6G and 11 -3C -5C. b. Include details for proposed fencing. The site plan shall not be altered without prior written approval of the City of Meridian Planning Department Conditions Document t Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC 5. A photometric lighting plan is required to be submitted within 6 months of the date of this approval. 6. Per Council's approval, the applicant shall be allowed to the the following irrigation facilities: Finch/South Slough and Stokesberry Lateral. The applicant shall also tile all other irrigation facilities asset forth in UDC 11 -3A -6A. 7. The applicant shall install bicycle parking facilities capable of holding a minimum of 29 bicycles as set forth in UDC 11 -3C -6G and 11 -3C -5C based on a total of 703 vehicle parking spaces provided. 8. The subject approval is only for the park site and associated improvements and is not for approval of any structures on the site. All future structures (i.e. library, senior center, recreation center, band shell, picnic shelters, maintenance building, restrooms, etc.) proposed on the site shall be approved through subsequent CZC and design review applications. 9. The applicant shall develop the site consistent with the letter & plan submitted by Parametrix, dated March 25, 2010, and approved by the Fire Department attached in Exhibit C. Process Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall pay any applicable impact fees prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. If any changes must be made to the site plan to accommodate ACRD requirements, the applicant shall submit a new site plan to the City of Meridian Planning Department for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. 3. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11 -3B -14A. 4. The applicant shall complete all required improvements prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. It is unlawful to use or occupy any building or structure until the Building Official has issued a Certificate of Occupancy. 5. The approved site plan and landscape plan shall not be altered without prior written approval of the City of Meridian Planning Department. 6. No signs are approved with this application. Prior to installing any signs on the property, the applicant shall submit a sign permit application consistent with the standards in UDC Chapter 3 Article D and receive approval for such signs. 7. The applicant shall complete all improvements related to public life, safety, and health as set forth in UDC 11 -5C -3B. A surety agreement may be accepted for other improvements in accord with UDC 11 -5C -3C. Ongoing Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant and/or assigns shall have the continuing obligation to provide irrigation that meets the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-6 and to install and maintain all landscaping as set forth in UDC 11-3B-5, UDC 11-3B-13 and UDC 11-3B-14. 2. The applicant has a continuing obligation to comply with the outdoor lighting provisions as set forth in UDC 11-3A-11. Conditions Document 2 Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC 3. The applicant shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain all pathways. 4. The project is subject to all current City of Meridian ordinances and previous conditions of approval associated with this site (Development Agreement Inst. 110021914). 5. The issuance of this CZC does not release the applicant from any previous requirements of the other permits issued for the site. 6. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to prune all trees to a minimum height of six feet above the ground or sidewalk surface to afford greater visibility of the area. 7. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain all landscaping and constructed features within the clear vision triangle consistent with the standards in UDC 11-3A-3. ANALYSIS OF UDC REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: Per UDC 11 -3C -6G, one bicycle parking space shall be provided for every 25 proposed vehicle parking spaces or portion thereof. Because a total of 703 vehicle parking spaces are proposed for this site, a minimum of 29 bicycle parking spaces are required. Fencing is depicted on the site plan; however, no details are provided. All fencing on the site shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. Fencing details shall be provided within 6 months of this approval with the detailed landscape plan. A photometric lighting plan has not been submitted with this application as plans have not progressed to that point. The applicant shall submit a photometric lighting plan that complies with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-11 within 6 months of the date of this approval. The landscape plan provided does not include the ultimate planting details. A detailed final plan will be submitted within 6 months of the date of this approval. The subject approval is only for the park site and associated improvements and is not for approval of any structures on the site. All future structures (i.e. library, senior center, recreation center, band shell, picnic shelters, maintenance building, restrooms, etc.) proposed on the site shall be approved through subsequent CZC and design review applications. 0.4401I1I0K9 A. Site Plan (dated 3/10/10) B. Landscape Plan (dated 3/10/10) C. Fire Department Approval Conditions Document 3 Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC Exhibit A— Site Plan (dated 3/10/10) HIIVfWY(MY"A Y*e4�9 wLEI+¢91EEN �i I: i11�i{g w IMYVNFf IeWIiOY P -v LPffMR.'WU� J_ ULIUS M. KLEINER MEMORIAL PARK CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE Meridian, Idaho fi'F� INNIMP&+moi,. PopIMi Turn oai�au•' ?aY •c vn�1 eu�Y ao �t rvk .� ��•..�.�m4 N4fibN ,i��sx ,•� CUXtlNtlfL1NIN CM m9w 'amu+ w+n a aaxi xoa+..__ 5N1 R%u-ai r�iw J_ ULIUS M. KLEINER MEMORIAL PARK CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE Meridian, Idaho fi'F� INNIMP&+moi,. PopIMi Turn oai�au•' ?aY •c vn�1 eu�Y ao �t rvk .� ��•..�.�m4 N4fibN ,i��sx ,•� CUXtlNtlfL1NIN CM m9w _- maToouxnw x�n rsn e,u 3 aoNmcamaauYxi� 1W N[BY(NN[i Y]Agfl9:� pp iOR'11fNfft' Govan $Neel Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC 'amu+ w+n _- maToouxnw x�n rsn e,u 3 aoNmcamaauYxi� 1W N[BY(NN[i Y]Agfl9:� pp iOR'11fNfft' Govan $Neel Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC • .. �..m ®..A. w- ni �a..�.emrua� 9114 VLAN 9f194Y .� n+o— 4�1R441�N rata.,. �' as vim Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC _��I CCN8f�C110N IIewarv.. IIIlom. SITE PLO SHEET Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC ----------------- - ''77 S , — I ,< �� +�I .iM1 ,x� Ntd1GIrILLY „� ..r t x ues�uvttXidatAtue 4 Jr� tiY I :� I Y .��r IRn ( A2fN. I - .moi �.a fps I � 16 I IIGiIgM � � i i , r wwr i ,r 1 ua�r..��a.�,rnrsnuYltttn I � � � i � w�. _ _ 1 p;Y � re —�--• � SS CSsuNiYAl51 ':r.. 6W.k11M1 T i �lit ' n M1�•-w. vovv...evn t 2.Itw MY ae.Y.[ Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC .... .... 1..j..� tr I7,, + . agw�ataaa " �f I� e,a�v 1 `� r ✓a �J �� if r f jj , ==V W r .L.. nln I irll ill ILII _ i .. ' .. �, ..iw.suurwaaio;".... nn .........t.... 1� w I .41`en .An..n.:............ , at l/ YtMY1E � a yg MMa.n _ 1 i 1+ Y muse 1l 1 ' I i NWOI Y[YOWIPNM {- III v b%YfdA f 1 i fe a 1 p,a,a •• •a.•. ••Anse. ,,,•a,a,e..eeA 0 it —a d". fUTi41Y !nn le ..._—_._ —.. ...... a••{•.�.�•�.f CEXi9W11C[IdV 1laN .n .r.R..vs N EftANUEE1 i1 - {iw.rai -TOM=6 Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC Exhibit B — Landscape Plan (dated: 3/10/10) Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC N9rP9N +..,n II aeune .i:,:i�. �I LXWIG EPW CCXhTR3CW11 .._ _ _�' oem�u t Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC Conditions Document Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC NN,�..,� C9N5'IRUCIgY �.e.,� � _ e. LANGBCAFC I'LRN tSA Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC SOTFOR TRASH ENCLOSURE Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC Ai t ..o,,..,MM,Via: ri-, 5'NPS r— _ sr n 4F. LE4A1[DN 530E 2 LLLLYA110R, rftONT FLOOR PLAN I .0....1 flf4#rF ..} �. .it..£" 1 CJ EEUVATION-WE r�jj ELOVARON. REAR SOTFOR TRASH ENCLOSURE Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC Ai C. Fire Department Approval V,Jv. WPIAU WDIM 6,p11 I1.'01 IItIS�: II,:m II March 25, 2010 PNIX No, 317-&168-001 Joe Silva Deputy Chief Piro Prevention Meridian Fire Department 33 E. Broadway Ave, Suite 204 Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Kleiner lv emcorial Part: CZC Fire Department Clarifications Dear Joe: The intent of this letter is to clai ify and suntnnm'ize our 3-23-10 meeting which centered on Fire Department concerns rwarding the CZC application For (lie Meurer Memorial Part: (KMP) based on thnwiugs dated 3-10-10, The KMP design and consifuclion leant is committed to addressing lite Fire Deperttneut concerns in n collaborative manor with tte Fire Department throngh limit design, including review mud approval of tut plans prior t construction. This philosophy will carry through into the construction of I(MP, ensuring that the improvements are constructed per lite approved plans. Below are the discussion items and actions: 1. '17w enth•e exterior gf'dre library btdldimg oust he within l5(J-feel nflhe fire depw9nuew drive lane. Parametric Response: Figurc I is attched showing [lie location of the fire department drive Ione and distances to the Furthest points ol•the building. The concrete walkway betveen the library mut senior center has been widened to 20 -feel, extending tie fire dolnut nem drive time. 'rhe Fiord construction documents will reflect the structural design ofconcrete lire lane. A mountable curb in the fire lane from the parking lo[ will also be installed. 7. Areas to he accessed through the •eine h I v the Fire Department neer! to he sized for h /eridiou aerie/Jiro tock with a 767..5 -inch wheelhose per the t•nclt speeflicationa• provided hY the kferirliau Fire Department. Paranuen•ix Response: Turning movements will be provided with (he final design plans for the entrance havi-scoion floor Records Road, through the roundabout, as wells the entrance and exits to the library and senior center parking lots. Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC Joe Silva March 25, 2010 Page 2 3. 0 fool drive area need to be maintained,' luchnling (he rounrlabanl, entrance boulevard, loop road, parking lot rh•ive isles, and access to the recreational area. Parametrix Response: Designated Fre lanes and routes as mentioned above will bo designed to achieve a minimum of 20 -feet of drive area. 'Phis area in some locations such as the loop rand and parking lots will be the asphult drive lane, by other meas such as the entrance boulevard and (lie roundabout the 7.0 -feet drive area will be achieved through a combination of the asphalt drive lana and a mountable curb with concrete. 4. Removable bollards must be reviewed and approved by Meridian Fire Deparnnent. Parametrix Response: Selection of bollards to include in the final design will be reviewed and approved by Meridian Fire Department. 5. d Fire hydrant mast be located within the nrnitnennnce facRilp parking lot. Parametrix Response: The final design plans will slow a fire hydrant within the maintenance facility parking lot, 6. Roartway and,Qre lane design needy to acconnnodale the 8 -fool fi•oni overhang of the aerlal fire n•erck. Parametrix Response: The final design plans will be check all tuck turning movements within the site to confirm that obstacles such as signs, trees, and site lighting are outside of this clear zone. Please fee nee to call with any questions. Justin Jones, PE Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC o =sa SCALE IN FEET I II\L WLFMIN I IVI"M1 M V QQ Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC 11 Parcel 2 60.00 Acres f 8 g • Y E ra .� AAwnw Sd9'KYiE Za# - 56P<6'SII E 66L61' MMMC:KNew Parcel 2 Exhibit Projed-No. '6077070.00 o v v 1 o N r v o. Datm 07101)08 Nleridtan Town Center ap P.Cooper maaw,eaamt mw, o t+ Scale: Y-350' rLansawamo acr wweerm !+fart Centercel LLC — _— uomreaoaa.maw G@pd VetimL kbM Sheet No. Sd1 x.a retlw E.>a/a xas memf.tm Legend u - s.at tavc O - ww.<r rsmv curer Nuhn xw swaror� dm asAtr PoMa �a5era c� asrx .+" srrm' rre.sr' xavvsveT - a <cfeho• u rao<v <• cT ru'r • r er xo • r . T tw p Lt di ' Parcel 2 60.00 Acres f 8 g • Y E ra .� AAwnw Sd9'KYiE Za# - 56P<6'SII E 66L61' MMMC:KNew Parcel 2 Exhibit Projed-No. '6077070.00 o v v 1 o N r v o. Datm 07101)08 Nleridtan Town Center ap P.Cooper maaw,eaamt mw, o t+ Scale: Y-350' rLansawamo acr wweerm !+fart Centercel LLC — _— uomreaoaa.maw G@pd VetimL kbM Sheet No. Sd1 L.J 11 ii313M1i7 I. General and Special Taxes for the year 2008, an accruing lien not due or payable until the fourth Monday in November 2008 when the bills are issued, the first half of which is not delinquent until after December 20, 2008. 2. General taxes which may be assessed and extended on any "subsequent" or "occupancy" tax roll, which may escape assessment of the regular tax roll; which are a lien not yet due or Payable. 3. Liens. levies and assessments by Nampa -Meridian Irrigation District. 4. Right of way for Stokeberry Lateral & South Lateral, also known as Finch Lateral, 5. &cept mineral or water:rights, claims or title to mineral or water not owned by Grantor. 6. Rights, rights of way, reservations and exceptions in the patent recorded in Book 5 of Patents, Page 18, 7. License Agreementuponthe terms, conditions and provisions contained therein; Dated: August 5, 1996 ' Parties: NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT & INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY Recorded: August 9,1996 Instrument No. 96066964 8. Right of access to and from the land. 9. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which would be disclosed by a correct ALTA/ACSM survey. . . 42a0.MZ12627011 STATE OF IDAHO COUNTY OF ADA L its di , IZOZ2w N , Ciiel" 'BIV (name) (address) ��— (city) (state) being first duly sworn upon, oath, depose and say: 1. That I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant my permission to: C eva Si`ddowq 3V a4fWA AVe,, (name) (address) to submit the accompanying application(s) pertaining to that property. 2. I agree to indemnify, defend and hold the City of Meridian and its employees harmless from any claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements contained herein or as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application. 3. I hereby grant permission to City of Meridian staff to enter the subject property for the purpose of site inspections related to processing said application(s). Dated this day of 20 4 � iA c KA. Era` a $,h `Ai SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. (Notary Public fq% Idaho) Residing at:14y" t My Commission Expires: 12JO E 4x°,oM•t ' •MCNnccTV x6 I . � 4rvo sutivev EXHIBIT A , f Boundary Description , ' - of NewParcel2' - for Morldian Centeres4 LLC Job No. 6077070.00 A parcel of land situated in the "southwest quarter and the west hatfofthe southwest quarter, . of the southeast quarter of Section 4, Township 3 North, Range 1 Bast, Boise Meridian; Ada 'Couuty; Idaho, being morepartioulady described as follows: Cu`nnenciog at a brass cap marking the mutbWmt Wonor of Section 4, Township 3.North, I mp I Bast, Boise Meridian; . Thence S89046'1M 265951 tett along the south line of the sohthwest quarter to a 5/8 inch robat mlddng the soinlr quartensecdita comer of Section 4; Thence S89046'39"33, 664.61 feet along the south line ofthe'southeast quarter, Thence MG -13'21"R, 57.74 feet to a 518 inch rebar,marlin9 the southwest odrner df Vanhue Subdivision, Book 27 of Plats -at Pages 1704 & 1705, records of Ada County, on the north rWg f-waylineofPeatFak-vlew Avenue; Thence 1400°04'25'Ti, 741-9T feet along the west line o£Venturc Subdi4i'ionto the POINT OF B3i�G: ' . Thence N89°59'29'•A; 1365:18 feet; , Ther cv 11821 feet on a non -tangent nerve to the Ieft, concave westerly, having a . radius of 511,67 feet, a central angle of 13-14'13", a chord bearing ofN38°03' 12"W, and achord length of i 17.95 feat ' ThenceN44°40'.28"W, 649.89 feet: . TBonoe 39q.G7 feet on a amve to the rlghthavkng: a radius of 48833 feet, a antral - gle of 464220", a chord bearing ofMI'19'08'R; and a chord length of 387.14 Thence N02002'02"9, 720.47' feet; Thence 1'6,85 feet on acu ve to the left having a radius of 51 L67 feet, a central angle of 1°53'12", a chord knaring ofN01005'26"E, and a chord length of 16.83 feet; Thence 1,400°68'50"B, 182.63 feet to the north Tine of the wrest half of the southwest quarter, Thence N8951 '01"T 20.33.1cet along the north line of the west half of go southwest quatter to a 5/8 imhrebar marking the southwest earner of Redfeather ' Estates Subdivision.No. 7 Book 96 of Plats at pages 11865 & 11866, records of Ada County, end the nortktwest comer of the east half bf the southwest quarter - - i ' Page I oft V 6fC__ 'moi tri I1TJ tutWMCinp Cr®t[ 83616 nap 4. ' r%nRJ]/6.8=8328. arx.Rryd<iyn.rom emv.arytlxc(pn.wm EXHIBIT A , f Boundary Description , ' - of NewParcel2' - for Morldian Centeres4 LLC Job No. 6077070.00 A parcel of land situated in the "southwest quarter and the west hatfofthe southwest quarter, . of the southeast quarter of Section 4, Township 3 North, Range 1 Bast, Boise Meridian; Ada 'Couuty; Idaho, being morepartioulady described as follows: Cu`nnenciog at a brass cap marking the mutbWmt Wonor of Section 4, Township 3.North, I mp I Bast, Boise Meridian; . Thence S89046'1M 265951 tett along the south line of the sohthwest quarter to a 5/8 inch robat mlddng the soinlr quartensecdita comer of Section 4; Thence S89046'39"33, 664.61 feet along the south line ofthe'southeast quarter, Thence MG -13'21"R, 57.74 feet to a 518 inch rebar,marlin9 the southwest odrner df Vanhue Subdivision, Book 27 of Plats -at Pages 1704 & 1705, records of Ada County, on the north rWg f-waylineofPeatFak-vlew Avenue; Thence 1400°04'25'Ti, 741-9T feet along the west line o£Venturc Subdi4i'ionto the POINT OF B3i�G: ' . Thence N89°59'29'•A; 1365:18 feet; , Ther cv 11821 feet on a non -tangent nerve to the Ieft, concave westerly, having a . radius of 511,67 feet, a central angle of 13-14'13", a chord bearing ofN38°03' 12"W, and achord length of i 17.95 feat ' ThenceN44°40'.28"W, 649.89 feet: . TBonoe 39q.G7 feet on a amve to the rlghthavkng: a radius of 48833 feet, a antral - gle of 464220", a chord bearing ofMI'19'08'R; and a chord length of 387.14 Thence N02002'02"9, 720.47' feet; Thence 1'6,85 feet on acu ve to the left having a radius of 51 L67 feet, a central angle of 1°53'12", a chord knaring ofN01005'26"E, and a chord length of 16.83 feet; Thence 1,400°68'50"B, 182.63 feet to the north Tine of the wrest half of the southwest quarter, Thence N8951 '01"T 20.33.1cet along the north line of the west half of go southwest quatter to a 5/8 imhrebar marking the southwest earner of Redfeather ' Estates Subdivision.No. 7 Book 96 of Plats at pages 11865 & 11866, records of Ada County, end the nortktwest comer of the east half bf the southwest quarter - - i ' Page I oft V 6fC__ 0 11 Now Nrcel2 contimied... Theacc N89°56'47'8,1330.68 feet along (he south line of Redf�her Estates . Subdivision No. 7, the south line ofRedfeaflter P.*ws Subdivision No. 6, Book 96 t of Plats atPages 11818 & 1181Q, records of Ada Cou*,•and the nofthHae of thq east half of the southwest gnaiter'to a 518 inch mbarmarldng the center quarteo- section rnme , Thence S00°10'49' i r, 1314.73 feet along the eastline of the southwest Tester to a 12 inch rebacm ki4g fire somhw'est tamer of Cioyca-Mmdows Subdivrsronlfo. 3, Book 24 of Plats at Pages 1524 & 1525, rceorda,of Ada County; Thence N89-58134" E, 662.97 feet along the south line ofClover Meadows SubdivisionNo.3 to a 1/2 inch xebec mazking the northWcst comer of Venture Subdivision; Book 27 of Plats at Pages 1704 & 1705; Thence S6oW,25V Ar, 524.56 feet alongthe west line of Veatur6 Subdivision to the • ' POINT OPBEGINHING.' The above-described parcel contains 60.00 aoccs, more a less. ' •-; "eet tosay existing'tasements or righus f -way of record or apparent; Page 2 of 2 r. o a l o a I N c. E El v. I_NC:5'3LIq$1/ -6% i ADA COUNTY RECORDER J. DAVID; ARRO AMOUNT 18.00 1 BOISE IDAHO 07t31t08 01:40 PM " RECORDED-REQUESTOP III IIIIIIIIIIII�IIIII(IIINIIIIIIIN Flrat American 108087270 When Recorded, Mail to: Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley LLP 877 Main Street, Suite 1000 Boise, Idaho 83702-5884 Attn: Rick Goodson SPACE ABOVE IMS LMEFOA BECORMEa'S USE ONLY In consideration of. Ten and 00/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, DAVID E. KLEINER, AS TRUSTEE OF THE 2008 KLEINER FAMILY TRUST U/T/D MARCH 4, 2008 (the "Grantor"), hereby grants and conveys to EUGENE M. KLEINER and MICHAEL E. HUTER, AS CO -TRUSTEES OF THE JULIUS M. KLEINER MEMORIAL PARK TRUST U/T/D April 5, 2007, whose address is 217 W. Georgia Ave., Suite 100, Nampa, Idaho 83686 (the "Grantee"), all of Grantor's undivided one-half (1/2) fee interest in and to the real property located in Ada County, Idaho, and described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; TOGETHER with all easements, rights and hereditaments appurtenant thereto and all improvements located thereon; SUBJECT ONLY TO current taxes and assessments; any leases agreed to by the Grantee; any easements, reservations, and restrictions of record to which Grantee's other undivided one- half (1/2) fee interest in said real property is subject, including, without limitation, the reservations, easements, covenants, conditions, restrictions, and other rights or interests identified in Exhibit B attached hereto; and the restrictive covenant and equitable servitude hereby imposed that no portion of the real property conveyed hereby shall be employed for residential or commercial uses; provided, however, said real property may be used as a public park for recreational purposes, which uses may include, but are not limited to, a care -taker's house, a non-commercial fitness center, swimming pool, aquarium, sports complex which may include but is not limited to soccer, football, lacrosse, baseball and softball fields, senior center, community center, outdoor concerts, and/or library (all of which may include the assessment of nominal user fees which will allow the City of Meridian, Idaho, or any other governmental agency operating such facilities to recover its operating costs as permitted by Idaho law and sell or provide to the public using such facilities refreshments, snacks and meals), season concession stands selling or renting, as the case may be, those products generally sold or rented in public parks, including, but not limited to soft drinks, candy, hot dogs, snow -cones, ice cream, popcorn, and bike, kite and skate rentals, and other similar non-commercial community uses. No portion of the above-described property shall be used for any residential, private commercial, or retail 42340 0003 1252692 1 uses, except for the above-described ancillary uses in connection with public recreational purposes. The Grantor, for itself and for its successors in interest, does by these presents expressly limit the covenants of this Deed to those herein expressed, excludes all covenants arising or to arise by statutory or other implication, and does hereby covenant that against all persons whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim by, through or under the Grantor, and not otherwise, it will warrant and defend the title to the above-described real property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this Special Warranty Deed this 7,4, day of July, 2008. Q S= 1 T e_ 'li-/4� DAVID E. KLEINER, AS THE TR STEE OF THE 2008 KLEINER FAMILY TRUST U/T/D MARCH 4, 2008 t�c1-�u SAmkk TATE OF qP Ai&A ) ss. COUNTY OF ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that DAVID E. KLEWER is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledge it as Trustee of the 2008 KLEINER FAMILY TRUST U/1YD MARCH 4, 2008, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Dated: July 2q , 2008 c:4Z& Alq�? Notary ped or prin ): (nom 0 eeSiS H' p4, Notary btic in and for the State of ••e•ee� ®}S80p Residing at:k«{_l (� Ak Y My appointment expires: l D —.7-1 0 PUB�'� �e aOV �Q�eee 42340 0003 1252692 1 till.li 11 iiitilt Ii . 1-1,1111 Till, . VIIIIIlIIIIJI 1I l'OU.: V:11!I4l;iiN ". '!'1ld \\. Ilt1'I:IeII UI�. illtl\ 1':,91 Il'P. 9il III ❑3P:,IU;:1lil 'I'. _atLRlr.11il.: I'. 9V1YIl.ln �; March 25, 2010 PMI\ No. 3 17-6468-00 1 ,lou Silva Deputy Chief fire Prevention Meridian Fire Department 33 E. Broadway Ave, Suite 204 Meridian, ID 83642 Rw Kleiner Menworial Park CZC fire Department Clarifications Dear Joe: The into" orwIs Her Is to Clarify incl sumunwhe our,313-10 nteefing which Centered on fire Deptuvnent concerns regarding the CZC application Ir the Kleiner Memorial Part. (KMIP) based on drawings dated 3-10-10. The KMP design and Construction team is committed to addressing the Piro Department concerns in a collaborative turner wish the fire Department through And dusig% including review and approval of the plans prior to ConstUCtiat. This philosophy will carry tlntmgh into lite construction of KMIP, ensuring that the improvements are constructed per (he approved plans. Below are the discussion items and nations: L The entre atwwlm- ufdra Iffirc rp tiodIr ing must be w1thi7 150 -feet nJ'/Ire,Jire depur twolo c1I /nue. Parametria Response: Figure I is attached showing Me location OF the IS depm9ment drive lane and distances to the furthest points of the building. 'Che concrete walkway between the library and senior center has been widened to 204eet, extending the fire depari hent chive have. 'The final cons(raelion documents \vill reflect the to nougat design of concrete fire In, A ntouatnble curb M the Are lune Ifunn the parking lot will also be installed. ?. Areas to he accessed through the site hp the Fite Depaamma need to he sized for kleridimr aerial fire truck with ei 267.5 -inch wheelhore per the truckspecff codons provided h) the d/eridiun Fire Deparlmerrt. Paramet•ix Response: 11uning movements will be provided with the final design plans for the entrance haoseciion from Records Rand, through the roundabout, ns walls the C vmwe and exits to the library and senior center parking lots. Joe Silva March 25, 2010 Page 2 3, 20 foot drive area need to be maintained; including the roundabout, entrance boulevard, loop road, parking lot LG-ive isles, and access to the recivillional area. Parametrix Response: Designated fire lanes and routes as mentioned above will be designed to achieve a niinini uu of 20 -feet of {hive area, This area in some locations such as the loop road and parking lots will be the asphalt drive lane. In other areas such its the entrance boulevard and the roundabout the 20 -feet drive area will be achieved through a combination of the asphalt drive lane and a mountable curb with concrete. a. RemonnGle bnllco c%r utast Ge revteu+erl curd approver/ Gy Aleridfan Fire Department. Parametrix Response: Selection of bollards to include in the final design will be reviewed and approved by Meridian Fire Department. S. A Fire hydrarrt must Ge locnteLl a+itlrht the nrnhrtencutce facililp parking lot. Parametrix Response: The final design plans will show a fire hydrant within the maintenance facility parking lot. 6. Rondtvay nndlire lane deatg/7 nL'BCLY t0 LiCCOn7nt0Cl{fte the Y fool ft'atrt O1+L'rltang 0' (h L' C1G't'IpI fPe h•trcl% Parametrix Response: The final design plans will be check all truck turning movements within the site to confirm that obstacles such as signs, trees, and site lighting are outside of this clear zone. Please feel ree to call with any questions. Justin Jones, PE MERIDIAN FIRE DEPARTMENT ,OZ q ENGINEERING . PLANNING . ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES 77611V RIVERSIDE DRIVE, SUITE 201 BOISE, ID 83714-5044 T. 208.898.0012 B. 208.947.1655 manv.panamenixxo/n Date: March 2, 2010 To: Kleiner Trust From: Pierson Dewit, P.E. Subject: Kleiner Memorial Park Traffic Analysis cc: PMX Project File 317-6268-001 Project Number: 317-6268-001 Project Name: Kleiner Memorial Park INTRODUCTIOIet Parametrix has been retained to conduct a traffic analysis for the proposed Kleiner Memorial Park development. The site is located north of Fairview Avenue between Eagle Road and Venture Street in Meridian, Idaho. Figure 1 shows the location of the project and its vicinity. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the traffic impacts resulting from the proposed recreational development in tine vicinity of the project. The study wilt utilize information and recommendations corresponding with the proposed Meridian Town Center improvements. Specifically, the following scenarios will be developed as part of this analysis. o Conduct atraffic analysis summarizing Level -of -Service (LOS) and recommended ehannelization of the Records Avenue / Fairview Avenue intersection, Venture Way / Fairview Avenue intersection, Records Avenue / Park Lane T -intersection, and the Records Avenue / Kleiner Memorial Main Park Access intersection needed only for the development of Kleiner Park. a Conduct a traffic analysis summarizing LOS and recommended lane configurations of tile Records Avenue / Fairview Avenue, Records Avenue / Park Lane, Records Avenue / Main Park Access, Venture Way / Fairview Avenue, and River Valley Street/ Eagle Road intersections utilizing the information contained in the traffic impact study (TIS) for the Meridian Town Center development and the site generated traffic anticipated for the development of Kleiner Palk. The Meridian Town Center TIS analyzed the full build out development of 112 acres on the east side and 80 acres on the west side of Eagle Road. This analysis did not include the development of Kleiner Memorial Park. Specifically, verify that proposed lane configurations for the Meridian Town Center development can also handle the anticipated traffic for Kleiner Memorial park under the full build out condition. TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED) PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Kleiner Memorial Park project is a proposed city park located within the city limits of Meridian, Idaho. The overall project footprint is 60 acres. Table 1 indicates the land uses anticipated for the site. Table 1. Land Use at Kleiner Park Overall Site Acres 60 Land Uses Acres Senior Center 0.34 Library 0.23 Park Lane Road 1.56 Internal Roadway and Roundabout 2.95 Site Parking 7.01 Site Development 12.09 Remaining Park Site 47.91 The proposed preliminary site plan for the project is shown in Figure 2. The study assumes the park development will be built out by the year 2012. As shown in the preliminary site plan, the development proposes utilizing two existing public street intersections onto Fairview Avenue. The primary access location is proposed for the intersection of Records Avenue and Fairview Avenue. A second access location is proposed for the intersection of Venture Way and Fairview Avenue. Under the ultimate build out condition as indicated in the Meridian Town Center TIS, multiple additional access points will be created as part of that development. Based on the Meridian Town Center development build out, it is anticipated that the park generated traffic will use the existing Venture Way / Fairview Avenue, existing Records Avenue / Fairview Avenue (with north leg added) and future River Valley Street / Eagle Road intersections. Kleine,-Memarial Park Trust 317-6268-001 Kleiner Memam'ial Park T,affic Analysis 3 March 2, 2010 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED) x MEMORIAL PARK PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS Traffic Volumes Existing p.m. peak hour turning movement volumes used for the Kleiner Memorial Park analysis were obtained from the Meridian Town Center development. The TIS developed for the Meridian Town Center was completed in 2008 and was considered to be current information for depicting the exiting p.m. peak hour condition for the impacted intersections. No additional analysis was conducted for the existing daily and p.m. peak hour traffic counts near the site. The existing daily and p.m. peak hour traffic counts near the site are summarized in Appendix A. Road System The road system in the site vicinity is described below: • Fairview Avenue is an east -west, 5-6 lane facility classified as a principal arterial. The posted speed limit is 40 mph. There are no dedicated bicycle lanes or on -street parking throughout the study area. • Eagle Road is a north -south, 5 -lane facility classified as a principal arterial. The posted speed limit is 55 mph. There are segments of dedicated bicycle lanes and no on -street parking throughout the study area. Kleiner Menror'ial Park Tn at 317 62 68-001 Kleiner Memorial Park Tt affiie Analpais 4 March 2, 2010 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (CONTIN • Records Avenue is a north -south 3 -lane facility classified as a local road, without a north leg under the current configuration. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. There are no dedicated bicycle lanes or on - street parking throughout the study area. • Venture Street is a north -south 2 -lane facility classified as a local road. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. There are no dedicated bicycle lanes or on -street parking throughout the study area. Intersections Without the Meridian Town Center Development The intersections identified for analysis within the site vicinity are described below for a scenario without the development of the Meridian Town Center: • The Records Avenue / Fairview Avenue intersection is a signal controlled T -intersection without a north leg. The following analysis added a north leg for access to Kleiner Memorial Park. • The Venture Way / Fairview Avenue intersection is a 4 -way intersection with stop control on the Venture Way approaches. • The Records Avenue / Park Lane access is proposed to be a stop controlled T -intersection. • The Records Avenue / Kleiner Main Park access is proposed to be a TWSC intersection. With the Meridian Town Center Development The intersections identified for analysis within the site vicinity are described below for a scenario with the development of the Meridian Town Center: • The River Valley Street / Eagle Road intersection is a stop controlled T -intersection without a west approach. • The Records Avenue / Fairview Avenue intersection is a signal controlled T -intersection without a north approach. A north leg is proposed for the condition in which Meridian Town Center and Kleiner Memorial Park are developed. • The Venture Way / Fairview Avenue intersection is a 4 -way intersection with stop control on the Venture Way approaches. • The Records Avenue / Park Lane access is proposed to be a stop controlled T -intersection. • The Records Avenue / Kleiner Main Park access (incorporating the Meridian Town Center east approach access and corresponding p.m. peak hour anticipated trips) is proposed to be a TWSC intersection. STUDY PERIOD The build out year for this study will be 2012 for the analysis without the Meridian Town Center development. This date was selected to allow for project approval, engineering, construction, and full development of the park site. This date was also selected to compare the proposed build out condition analyzed for the Kleiner Park development without the anticipated Meridian Town Center Development. Additional analysis was conducted based on the Cumulative Impacts Total Traffic Scenario identified in the Meridian Town Center TIS, which is beyond the 2012 build out of the Kleiner Park site. Kleiner Memorial Park Trust 317-6268-001 Kleiner Memorial Park Traffic 5 dlareh 2, 2010 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (CONTI PROJECTED TRAFFIC Site Traffic Trip Generation Site traffic generation is normally estimated by procedures recommended in the latest edition of the Trip Generation Manual (8t" Edition) published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Trip rates estimated in the manual are based on actual driveway traffic measurements performed on different land uses nationwide, particularly in metropolitan areas. The site trip generation is obtained by applying the trip rates from the Trip Generation Manual to each of the uses of the site development. Table 2 represents the summary of the site trip generation used in this report. The proposed development is projected to generate an average daily traffic (ADT) of 1,040, of which the p.m. peak hour traffic (PHT) is 140 vehicles per hour (vph). Table 2. Trip Generation Summary The amount of daily trips anticipated for Saturdays is slightly higher than the total number of trips anticipated for a normal weekday, which is consistent with this type of development. For comparison purposes and coordination with the Meridian Town Center TIS, the tips generated during the week (ADT) have been utilized. Based on information contained in the Meridian Town Center TIS there will be approximately 36,600 net new daily trips and approximately 4,400 net new trips generated during the p.m. peak hour (refer to Appendix A) for full build out of the site. In comparing the trips generated by the Meridian Town Center relative to the anticipated trips for the Kleiner Memorial Park, traffic generated from the park represents 2.8 % of the daily and 3.0% of the p.m. peak hour trips created by the development of both projects. Captured trips are trips that will not leave the proposed development. Once the Meridian Town Center is fully developed there is the potential for a percentage of the total traffic anticipated due to the Kleiner Park to be `captured' within the overall site development of the Meridian Town Center. For purposes of this study it was 317-6268-001 Kleiner Memorial Park Dust 6 Mach 2, 2010 Kleiner Memorial Park Dafflc Analysis Senior Center Librar Park TOTAL ROUNDED (per 1000 sf) (per 1000 st) (acres) Units 15,000 10,000 47.91 Trip Generation Rate 24 -hr daily rate 22.88 56.24 2.28 PM Peak hour rate 2.39 7.2 0.59 Saturday daily trips 9.1 46.55 12.14 Total Trips Generated 1,014 1,040 24 -hr daily trips 343 562 109 24 -hr capture 0 0 0 24 -hr new trips 343 562 109 PM Peak Hour 36 72 28 136 140 PM Peak Hour capture 0 0 0 PM peak hour new trips 36 72 28 Saturday daily trips 137 466 582 1,185 f,200 Saturday capture 0 0 0 Saturday new trips 137 466 582 The amount of daily trips anticipated for Saturdays is slightly higher than the total number of trips anticipated for a normal weekday, which is consistent with this type of development. For comparison purposes and coordination with the Meridian Town Center TIS, the tips generated during the week (ADT) have been utilized. Based on information contained in the Meridian Town Center TIS there will be approximately 36,600 net new daily trips and approximately 4,400 net new trips generated during the p.m. peak hour (refer to Appendix A) for full build out of the site. In comparing the trips generated by the Meridian Town Center relative to the anticipated trips for the Kleiner Memorial Park, traffic generated from the park represents 2.8 % of the daily and 3.0% of the p.m. peak hour trips created by the development of both projects. Captured trips are trips that will not leave the proposed development. Once the Meridian Town Center is fully developed there is the potential for a percentage of the total traffic anticipated due to the Kleiner Park to be `captured' within the overall site development of the Meridian Town Center. For purposes of this study it was 317-6268-001 Kleiner Memorial Park Dust 6 Mach 2, 2010 Kleiner Memorial Park Dafflc Analysis TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED) assumed that no trips will be captured as this is a conservative approach to the impacts felt on the adjacent roadways and intersections. Pass -by trips are those trips that currently exist on the roadways adjacent to the project site. Once the site is developed, those pass -by trips will enter the site and then travel on to their primary destination. Due to the nature of this development, it is assumed that this site is a primary destination and doesn't lend itself to many pass -by trips. These assumptions are only specific to the traffic generated by Kleiner Park and are not specific to the analysis conducted in the Meridian Town Center analysis. Trip Distribution Once the generated trips are estimated, they must be distributed to the geographic origins or destination and assigned to particular segments of the adjacent transportation network. The trip distribution along the roadway network and turning movement percentages were based on the regional nature of the park. Kleiner Memorial Park is a city park that will primarily serve Meridian residents. Based on that assumption it was determined that approximately 90% of all the trips generated due to the development originate from the south, west and north (e.g. Meridian, Eagle and I-84) where the remaining 10% of trips generated will originate from the east (e.g. Boise). Background Traffic Background (No -Build) traffic volumes for the year 2012 were obtained from the Meridian Town Center TIS. See Appendix A for the 2012 background traffic values and existing lane configurations used from the Meridian Town Center TIS. Total Traffic Kleiner Memorial Park Development The site traffic is added to the background traffic to obtain the total build traffic for the year 2012. The site traffic distribution for only the proposed Kleiner Memorial Park development is depicted in Figure 3. The combined values for the 2012 background p.m. peak hour were added to the traffic volumes generated by the project site and are shown in Figure 4. Proposed lane configurations are also indicated in Figure 4 for the Kleiner Memorial Park Development only. The only access to Kleiner Memorial Park for this scenario will be at the Records Avenue / Fairview Avenue and the Venture Way / Fairview Avenue intersections. In order to serve the access needs for Kleiner Park, the only roadway improvements needed consist of a two lane roadway from Fairview Avenue to the Records Avenue / Kleiner Park TWSC access, the TWSC at the Kleiner Park access and a tluu-left and dedicated right -turn lane for the southbound traffic at the intersection of Records Avenue and Fairview Avenue. There is no north leg currently at the existing Records Avenue / Fairview Avenue intersection, improving the north leg at the intersection will provide full access to Kleiner Memorial Park. Associated Roadway Improvement s - Kleiner Memorial Park Development The following are the roadway improvements recommended based on the development of only Kleiner Memorial Park. ➢ Eagle Road, Fairview Avenue, and Venture Way — No Improvements ➢ Records Avenue —Two lane access road from Fairview Avenue to the Main Park access. ➢ Park Lane —Two lane access road connecting Records Avenue to Venture Way Kleiner Memorial Park Pnnst 317.6268-001 Kleiner Memorial Park Daffic Analysis 7 March 2, 2010 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED) Q JULIUS M. KL.EINER MEMORI.A►L. PARK N FIGURE 3 - SITE TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION y,w (KL.EINER DARK ONLY) asamnlx Kleiner Memorial Park Trial 317-6268-001 Kleiner Memorial Park Traffic Analysis 8 March 2, 2010 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED) JULIUS M. KLEINER MEMORIAL PARK FIGURE 4 - 2012 BACKGROUND PLUS KLEINER MEMORIAL PARK SITE TRAFFIC ftn""trix Kleiner Memorial Park Trust 317-6268-001 Kleiner Memo, ial Park Traffic Analysis 9 March 2, 2010 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED) Kleiner Memorial Park and Meridian Town Center Development Combined To ensure that the proposed improvements resulting from the Meridian Town Center Development can integrate the development impacts from the Kleiner Memorial Park site without additional mitigation measures, a supplemental analysis was conducted (refer to Appendix A for the site traffic distribution only for the proposed Meridian Town Center recommended improvements, based on the build out condition alternative: Cumulative Impact Scenario). The Cumulative Impact Scenario was utilized for analysis purposes as it was considered the most conservative analysis, incorporating all anticipated development in the vicinity. The Cumulative Impact Scenario analysis goes well beyond the 2012 design year anticipated for Kleiner Memorial Park and Meridian Town Center. Figure 5 depicts the cumulative impacts total traffic as well as lane configurations identified in the Meridian Town Center TIS for the full -build out scenario, incorporating the Kleiner Memorial Park trips. For this analysis an additional access for the future River Valley Street / Eagle Road intersection was incorporated assuming that once full build out of the Meridian Town Center is complete some of the Kleiner Memorial Park traffic originating from Eagle Road will redistribute to this intersection. Kleiner Memortat Park Trasl 317-6268-001 Kleiner Memorial Park Traffic Analysis 10 March 2, 2010 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED) TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Capacity Analysis and Level -of -Service A capacity analysis was performed using the latest edition of Synchro for the impacted intersections and Sidra for the proposed internal roundabout. An intersection capacity analysis for the 2012 background, 2012 background plus Kleiner Memorial Park, Meridian Town Center without Kleiner Memorial Park and Meridian Town Center plus Kleiner Memorial Park build out scenarios were performed. The results of the area's capacity analysis are summarized in Table 3. Refer to Appendix B for the Synchro and Sidra capacity analysis outputs. 317-6268-001 Kleiner Memorial Pal*Trasl March 2, 2010 Kleiner Memorial Park Traffic Analysis 1 / n s 0 m r m O N m m d N O O O NMN N . o O O O O O o O O a U N M y j h a a 5 ro rN� nV 0p0m0m.� ,t `6 0n8 aiomw 6,d `m6 N�U CtOj o6cOV m U � O O U o W W LL o WOW W U m LL o W Q Q U U Q Q Q Q Q Q J N J m U o 0 o a o Z 5 py -� min ur o X11: C;m I: m 4IC In Mw6Gi � (O .'6 d U F O o m o W W LL U W O W W m o J � U o0 m > Y (p ISM I�MNNN 1ppO�� N (ppOH� m m N M V N N N 20 Y U N m c'omQ000poo J �D m �Vo moo z> a s U ro m N EomQmU,oUo mmmmm3mm mmf°mm 3: lmmw3mmmrnmmm (n W 3:zmF Z wow �ZVifW 2iZmh �;Z (nm W Zim ii Q Q iE 5� A > Z 2 Y Y Lb LL 1 m a d d > a m > m 0 p 2 v 9 L6 0 U U r S Z m > W ft OC Z n 2012 Background plas Kleiner Memorial Park According to the analysis conducted for the 2012 background plus Kleiner Memorial Park traffic it is anticipated that the Records Avenue / Fairview Avenue signalized intersection will operate at LOS B with an average delay of 19.7 seconds. The lane configuration used for this scenario requires the addition of a dedicated southbound left-thlulane and a right -turn lane. Records Avenue / Fairview Avenue is currently a signalized T -Intersection without a southbound approach. The current signal has been placed to allow the development of the southbound approach as needed for future development. In comparing the 2012 background traffic delay there will be an increase of approximately 7.4 seconds of additional delay at this intersection with the development of Kleiner Memorial Park. For the 2012 background plus Kleiner Memorial Park traffic, it is anticipated that the Venture Road / Fairview Avenue TWSC intersection will operate at LOS D with an average delay of 29.6 seconds during the p.m. peak hour. The current lane configuration was used for this analysis scenario. Meridian Town Center Cumulative Impacts Scenario without Kleiner Manorial Park An analysis was conducted to confirm the LOS indicated in the Meridian Town Center Traffic Impact Study Cumulative Impact Scenario strictly for comparison purposes relative to the addition of the projected Kleiner Memorial Park generated traffic. According to the capacity analysis conducted for the Meridian Town Center and verified by the capacity analysis conducted by Parametrix, the signalized intersection of Records Avenue / Fairview Avenue is predicted to operate at LOS D with an average delay of 39.1 seconds. The TWSC intersection of Venture Road / Fairview Avenue is anticipated to operate at LOS F for the southbound left turning traffic at an average delay of 76.5 seconds during the p.m. peak hour. The lane configuration proposed in the Meridian Town Center Traffic Impact Study was used, which consisted of dedicated southbound and northbound left turn lanes. This analysis incorporated the Meridian Town Center access for the eastbound approach. The signalized intersection of River Valley Street and Eagle Road is predicted to operate at LOS D with an average delay of 35.7 seconds by the year 2012. The lane configuration proposed in the Meridian Town Center Traffic Impact Study was used for this analysis. Meridian Town Canter Cumulative Impacts Scenario with Kleiner Memorial Park Based on the analysis conducted for the full build out of the Meridian Town Center traffic with Iffeiner Memorial Park traffic, it is predicted that the signalized intersection of Records Avenue and Fairview Avenue will operate at LOS D during the p.m. peak hour with an average delay of 40.9 seconds. This is a delay increase of 1.8 seconds when comparing the delay anticipated for this scenario to that for just the development of the Meridian Town Center. The lane configuration proposed to mitigate the impacts due to the Meridian Town Center was utilized for this development scenario. The TWSC intersection of Venture Road / Fairview Avenue is anticipated to operate at LOS F for the southbound left turning traffic at an average delay of 77.1 seconds during the p.m. peak hour. This is a delay increase of 0.6 seconds when comparing the delay anticipated for this scenario to that for just the Meridian Town Center development. The lane configuration proposed to mitigate the impacts due to the Meridian Town Center was utilized for this development scenario. Although the southbound left turning traffic will experience a LOS F during the p.m. peak hour, the overall northbound approach will operate at LOS D with 25.3 seconds of delay and Kleiner Memorial Park Trust 317-6268-001 Kleiner Memorial Park Da fic Analysis 13 D4arnh 2, 2010 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINU the southbound approach will operate at LOS E with 40.5 seconds of delay during the p.m. peak hour. The overall Intersection Capacity Utilization is predicted to operate at 47.4% capacity. According to the capacity analysis conducted for the signalized intersection of River Valley Street and Eagle Road it is anticipated that this intersection will operate at LOS D with an average delay of 37.1 seconds. This is a delay increase of 1.4 seconds in comparing the delay anticipated for this scenario relative to that for just the development of the Meridian Town Center. The lane configuration proposed to mitigate the impacts due to the Meridian Town Center was utilized for this development scenario. The TWSC intersection proposed to serve as the primary access to the Kleiner Memorial Park off of Records Avenue, north of the Records Avenue / Park Lane T -intersection was analyzed for the p.m, peak hour. The most significant delay at the intersection is anticipated for the westbound approach at LOS F with 66.0 seconds of delay. The volume to capacity ratio for the westbound approach is 0.43 which indicates that although there is some anticipated delay there is sufficient capacity. The overall anticipated intersection operation is predicted to operate at LOS A (11.5 seconds of average delay) with an Intersection Capacity Utilization of 50.4 percent. The Records Avenue / Park lane T -intersection was analyzed for the p.m. peak hour. The most significant delay at the intersection is anticipated for the westbound approach at LOS C with 17.3 seconds of delay. The overall anticipated intersection operation (i.e. Intersection Capacity Utilization) is predicted to operate at LOS A with an average delay of 1.2 seconds. An internal roundabout is anticipated to serve the traffic needs within the Kleiner Memorial Park. Based on the analysis conducted, this internal roundabout, located approximately 400 feet to the northeast of the TWSC intersection along Records Avenue, is predicted to operate at LOS A with an average delay of 3.6 seconds. Eagle Road/Fairview Avenue Intersection Multiple analysis scenarios were utilized in determining the capacity and lane configuration needs at the Eagle Road / Fairview Avenue intersection for the Meridian Town Center TIS. The document concluded that the improvements proposed to be constructed for the Meridian Town Center will generally mitigate the impact created by the increase in anticipated trips at the intersection. Considering there will be only a 3.0 percent (p.m. peak hour) increase with the addition of the Kleiner Memorial Park to the Meridian Town Center traffic, additional analysis was not conducted. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS The proposed Kleiner Memorial Park is a 60 acre recreational development that will include park open space, a Senior Center and a Library. The proposed development is located on the north side of Fairview Avenue between Eagle Road and Venture Street and on the east side of Eagle Road between River Valley Street and Fairview Avenue. The following are the principle conclusions of the traffic analysis for the Kleiner Memorial Park: 1) The proposed recreational development is projected to generate an ADT of 1,040 vehicles of which the p.m. peak hour traffic is 140 vehicles per hour. 2) The proposed roadway improvements are as follows: a. Records Avenue — Construct a two-lane access road (north leg only) from Fairview Avenue to Main Park Access b. Park Lane —Construct a two-lane access road from Records Avenue to Venture Way 317-6268-001 Kleiner Memorial Park Trust March 2, 2010 Kleiner Memo-ial Park Traffic Analysis 14 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED) 3) The signalized intersection of Records Avenue and Fairview Avenue is predicted to operate at LOS B with an average delay of 19.7 seconds during the p.m. peak hour combining the 2012 background traffic plus the anticipated Kleiner Memorial Park traffic. The addition of a southbound dedicated left-tbru lane and a right turn lane at the intersection will be required to ensure LOS B under this scenario. 4) The TWSC intersection of Venture Street and Fairview Avenue is anticipated to operate at LOS D with an average delay of 29.6 seconds during the p.m. peak hour when combining the 2012 background traffic plus the anticipated Kleiner Memorial Park traffic. This LOS is anticipated under the current lane configuration. 5) The signalized intersection of Records Avenue and Fairview Avenue is predicted to operate at LOS D with an average delay of 40.9 seconds during the p.m, peak hour combining the cumulative impacts scenario (Meridian Town Center) plus the Kleiner Memorial Park traffic. The lane configurations proposed in the Meridian Town Center TIS were utilized for this analysis. No additional mitigation measures are required beyond the improvements identified in the Meridian Town Center analysis. 6) The TWSC intersection of Venture Street and Fairview Avenue is anticipated to operate at LOS F with an average delay of 77.1 seconds during the p.m. peak hour for the southbound left turning movements combining the cumulative impacts scenario (Meridian Town Center) plus the Kleiner Memorial Park Traffic. The lane configurations proposed in the Meridian Town Center TIS were utilized for this analysis. Although the southbound left turning traffic will experience a LOS F during the p.m. peak hour, the overall northbound approach will operate at LOS D with 25.3 seconds of delay and the southbound approach will operate at LOS E with 40.5 seconds of delay during the p.m. peak hour. The overall Intersection Capacity Utilization is predicted to operate at 47.4% capacity. 7) The Records Avenue / Park lane T -intersection was analyzed for the p.m. peak hour. The most significant delay at the intersection is anticipated for the westbound approach at LOS C with 17.3 seconds of delay. The overall anticipated intersection operation (i.e. Intersection Capacity Utilization) is predicted to operate at LOS A with an average delay of 1.2 seconds. The overall anticipated intersection operation is predicted to operate at LOS A with an Intersection Capacity Utilization of 35.4 percent. 8) The TWSC intersection proposed to serve as the Main Park access to the Kleiner Memorial Park off of Records Avenue, north of the Records Avenue / Park Lane T -intersection was analyzed for the p.m. peak hour combining the cumulative impacts scenario (Meridian Town Center) plus the Kleiner Memorial Park Traffic. The most significant delay at the intersection is anticipated for the westbound approach at LOS F with 66.0 seconds of delay. The volume to capacity ratio for the westbound approach is 0.43 which indicates that although there is delay anticipated for the left turn movement there is sufficient capacity. The overall anticipated intersection operation is predicted to operate at LOS A with an Intersection Capacity Utilization of 50.4 percent. The lane configurations depicted in Figure 5 will serve the capacity needs anticipated for the increase in traffic resulting from both the Meridian Town Center and the Kleiner Memorial Park at this intersection. The intersection will be developed to provide access to Kleiner Memorial Park. Development of the remaining intersection and roadway features is anticipated to occur upon construction of the Meridian Town Center development. 9) The proposed single lane roundabout internal to Kleiner Memorial Park will operate at a LOS A with an average delay of 3.6 seconds during the p.m. peak hour. A single lane roundabout will serve the capacity needs anticipated for the internal site traffic resulting from the Kleiner Memorial Park development. Kleiner Memorial Park Thai 317-6268-001 Kleiner Memorial Park DafficAnalysis 15 Murch 2, 2010 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED) ACRONYMS ADT Average Daily Traffic ITE Institute of Traffic Engineers LOS Level -of -Service PHT Peak Hourly Traffic TWSC Two-way stop controlled vph Vehicles per Hour Kleiner Memorial Park Trust 317-6268-001 Kleiner Dfeumrial Park T}affic Analysis 16 Marclf 2, 2010 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED) REFERENCES Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Trip Generation Manual — 8`h Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2008 Development Policy Manual, Ada County Highway District, September 2007 Transportation Impact Analysis, Meridian Town Center: Kittelson & Associates, Inc., January 2008 317-6268-001 Kleiner Memorial Park Trost Maw], 2, 2010 Kleiner Memorial Park Traffic Analysis 17 APPENDIX A - REFERENCED MATERIAL FROM MERIDIAN TOWN CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 2 )§ \ + § \ !w ■ ®\ \g�q/ \y�y Q« / Ay 4!» � + a \§ \ + \ E »yr g _ ««� % (§ \) } ~ / \® e 2 )§ \ + § \ !w ■ ®\ \ \y�y / Ay 4!» (§ — \® 2 )§ \ + § \ !w ■ e� 42 t > 2g �{ \« )/ 2 3= z< 7 3!{ z g R _ 2§ 4 g %\ � �f{ 2� 0 w� R /y 9 t =< A 72 /{ \( e a ~ )I( e e� 42 t > 2g �{ \« m � G� = ^g Iz a z Qt R 4 g %\ � �f{ 2� 0 w� R /y t /{ \( e §! e� > 2g \2 Meridian Town Center January 2008 Executive Summary r Meridian CenterCal, LLC is preparing a Master Plan for a mixed-use development (Meridian Town Center), on the northwest and northeast quadrants of the Fairview Avenue/Eagle Road intersection. Phases 1 & 2 of the overall master planned development are proposed to consist of approximately 974,000 square -feet of retail space along with approximately 136,000 square -feet of office space and approximately 175 to 200 multi -family units. Phase 3 of the master plan is broken into two parcels; the west parcel is located on the northwest corner of the Fairview Avenue/Eagle Road intersection and the east parcel is located on the northeast corner of the Records Road/Fairview Avenue intersection. Phase 3 West is proposed to consist of approximately 525,000 square -feet of retail space and approximately 480,000 square -feet of office space. Phase 3 East is proposed to consist of approximately 220,000 square -feet of office space and approximately 120 multi -family units. Access to the site is proposed via Eagle Road, Fairview Avenue, a new extension of Records Road, and River Valley Street. The build -out year for the entire master plan is unknown at this time and will ultimately reflect market conditions, but is assumed to be year 2012 for the purpose of this analysis. FINDINGS Proposed Development Plan The proposed Meridian Town Center master plamLed development is projected to generate approximately 36,595 net new daily trips. The development is projected to generate approximately 4,370 trips (1,725 inbound, 2,645 outbound) during the weekday p.m. peak hour. Off -Site Operations Summary Table 1 summarizes the operational analysis at each of the off-site study intersections during the weekday p.m. peak hour. 2 Kittelson &Associates, Inc. C §! \ + \ \gym/ > ay w« )! ~ e �� »w � * , \ f } bg y± @ � R » #r g )) } + £ a e §! \ + \ > ay )! ~ e = f!y � q< (} \ f } bg y± §! \ + \ 2 m, . \a«� \ ~ �e t m 7 §! /\ / W -M 2 )i{ _ ~« %{ # e � : � /!& G 73 ml�, \t \ m 7 p & /{ \� \m m� *7Z \{ e. . /{ ,O .- _# \.. \ ,!& . /\ e � . 2 m, . \a«� \ ~ �e t m 7 §! { / W -M 2 )i{ _ ~« !z # @ : /t S fi \t \ m 7 p & /{ \� \m m� *7Z e s /{ ,O .- _# \ 2 2 3 m, . \a«� IIH ^\ t . m 9 §! { = _ 2 )i{ 3 m, . IIH ^\ t . M 9 { = _ # : _ S fi \t \ t( p au ,lAVM ,O .- _# ` § 2 m __,e °tl-.t 3 s\ I. \ !!) \ \ 3 e = \�»q� yw !! !f!y g Q« ! m ; » 4 QR ~ + 4 ~ | AV » a \\ \ ~ \ § \ \ + \ 2 »yr g : 4«/ \ \HOMO .a H� E E e I. \ !!) \ \ � / yw !! !f!y g IS ZIHMNAA ! m ; » 4 QR ~ \ 4 ~ | AV » ,Q» \\ \ ~ \ § A \ \ \HOMO H� I. \ !!) §| � / yw >g - I. \ !!) §| � / � ( - & IS ZIHMNAA ! m ; » ~ \ 4 ~ | AV » § A \ I. \ !!) §| � / � ( - & IS ZIHMNAA ! m I. / !!) §| } / !My ( Az & I. §` ,q< � �_ !) �� / !My ■ a__IO IS ZIHMNAA : R | | AV » \ \ \HOMO H� E E ` § ( . § __,__� O m�R m o iL y< 9z1 yy � iot '¢ LLLL 1 � -W 1 r�sm p� qtr o a�� a�$ °�4 F94 2 S6t� yx$� 064 sLL qty 3LL O 7_ o sago $ -yam w d =LL �R� o o g� titr >Q Q 5L21 gd �WI 512y og • tRL 0 J aa$ oLL J1L o Jb x O �w �I I OD520 qtr y�j �� 08` Stl2 JW �4d ^A W 9U1 _• •—S9t � O 9$� �I t�SWttt mitts 38� w¢ m LL � r"i L o ��R O m�R m o iL y< 9z1 yy � iot '¢ LLLL 1 � ¢¢ tr �LL o =6� o °�4 F94 2 5{y sLL qty 3LL O 7_ o sago $ Ew tr w d =LL �R� o o a� rig >Q Q 5L21 gd �WI 512y og • tRL 0 J 56SLy FVg FOE& oLL �?s o { � Y OD520 o� �9t5 y�j �� 08` Stl2 JW �4d w R8� 0 �� USS t�SWttt mitts 38� w¢ titr O m�R ? A o iL ua o{y ��w� �9 '¢ LLLL 11 ¢¢ tr �LL t o �F Jl �an� muR� 3LL O 7_ o �o Ew tr w gad H52y wp38 �—SSfE w r o 0 J 56SLy FVg FOE& OU' OL'1 3$i .I OII p� 3gi $may S+° tWOC w O $ pis mitts 38� w¢ oel� �al LL titr o ��R ? opDr o iL ua o{y ��w� �9 '¢ LLLL 11 w tr ? opDr w H= �j ua o{y ��w� �9 '¢ LLLL 11 w © � ? a J�4 w � �� OIZ^, a�•? '¢ LLLL tr w o gs ? a J�4 w � rtija � 18 t5p v4� w` tr ? p9 tr U�Z TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (CONTINUED) APPENDIX B - SYNCHRO AND SIDRA CAPACITY ANALYSIS OUTPUTS Queues Without Project 1: E Fairview Ave & Records Ave 2012 PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay Queue Length 501h (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Splllback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced We Ratio 1015 150 1250 163 Prot 4 3 4 3 4.0 20.0 42.0 46.7% 3.5 0.5 0.0 4.0 Lead Yes C -Max 0.60 5.1 0.0 5.1 11 34 1942 4.0 8.0 23.0 25.6% 3.5 0.5 0.0 4.0 Lag Yes None 0.45 35.6 0.0 35.6 81 142 rti 1155 385 125 1255 418 136 Perm 8 2 2 8 2 2 4,0 4.0 4,0 20.0 20.0 20.0 65.0 25.0 25.0 72.2% 27.8% 27.8% 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 C -Max 0.54 8.4 U 8.4 166 214 1237 2067 363 2330 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.60 0.45 0.54 Max 0.54 33.2 0.0 33.2 107 154 687 200 778 0 0 0 0.54 Max 0.29 7.1 0.0 7.1 0 44 200 463 0 0 0 0.29 Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 offset: 85 (94%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Splits and Phases: 1: E Fairview Ave & Records Ave t a2 '-1 o4 i� o3 _ 25s- 08 EMP Synchro7- Report 10/2/2009 S:1Erik\Klelner Park - Boise12012PMBaseline.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Without Project 1: E Fairview Ave & Records Ave 2012 PM Peal<Hour Lane Configurations +t'+ HCM Volume to Capacity ratio `5 TT 7111 P Volume (vph) 1015 135 150 1155 385 125 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 190D 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00 Ftt 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 agii 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 4853 1719 3438 3335 1538 Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow erm 4853 1719 3438 3335 1538 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 1103 147 163 1255 418 136 RTOR Reduction (vph) 19 0 0 0 0 104 Lane Group Flow (Vph) 1231 0 163 1255 418 32 Turn Type Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 3 8 2 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 36.0 19.0 61.0 21.0 21.0 Effective Green, g (s) 38.0 19.0 61.0 21,0 21.0 Actuated giC Ratio 0.42 0.21 0.68 0.23 0.23 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.o 4.0 Vehicle Extension s 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2049 363 2330 778 359 v/s Ratio Prot c0.25 0.09 c0.37 c0.13 We Ratio Perm 0.02 v/c Ratio ` 0.60 0.45 0.54 0.54 0.09 Uniform Delay, di 20.1 30.9 7.4 30.2 27.0 Progression Factor 0.21 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 0.9 0.9 2.7 0.5 Delay (s) 5.2 31.8 8.3 32.9 27.5 Level of Service A C A C C Approach Delay (s) 5.2 11.0 31,6 Approach LOS A B C NCM Average Control Delay 12.3 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.56 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.9% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group EMP 10/2/2009 1 Synchro 7 - Report S:1HMKleiner Park - Boise12012PM13aseline.syn HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Without Project 2: E Fairview Ave & Venture St- 4 2012 PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations I tt if 16 1t+ 1004 4+ 27 27 4+ 16 Volume (veh/h) 15 1090 15 15 1385 10 10 5 10 10 5 10 Sign Control 0 Free 11 it Free cSH Stop 1700 1700 Stop 695 Grade 1700 0% 160 Volume to Capacity 0% 0.35 0% 0.01 0.02 0% 0.30 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 16 1185 16 16 1505 11 11 5 11 11 5 11 Pedestrians B C D Approach Delay (s) 0.2 Lane Width (ft) 0.1 21.1 32.0 Approach LOS Walking Speed (ft/s) C D jntersectionSOtnn ary Average Delay 0.7 Percent Blockage Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.6% ICU Level of Service Right turn flare (veh) A Analysis Period (min) 15 Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) 1317 pX, platoon unblocked 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 vC, conflicting volume 1516 1201 2016 2766 592 2182 2777 758 vC1, stage 1 cont vol 1217 1217 1543 1543 vC2, stage 2 cont vol 799 1549 639 1234 vCu, unblocked vol 1516 661 1721 2696 0 1936 2710 756 to, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.6 6.6 7.0 Z6 6.6 7.0 to, 2 stage (s) 6.6 5.6 6.6 5.6 IF (s) " 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 96 98 95 96 99 90 96 97 cM capacity (veh/h) 422 695 204 130 826 110 139 343 Volume Total 16 592 592 16 16 1004 513 27 27 Volume Left 16 0 0 0 16 0 0 11 11 Volume Right 0 0 0 16 0 0 11 it 11 cSH 422 1700 1700 1700 695 1700 1700 251 160 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.35 0.35 0.01 0.02 0.59 0.30 0.11 0.17 Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 9 15 Control Delay (s) 13.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.3 0.0 0.0 21.1 32,0 Lane LOS B B C D Approach Delay (s) 0.2 0.1 21.1 32.0 Approach LOS C D jntersectionSOtnn ary Average Delay 0.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 EMP Synchro7- Report 10/2/2009 S;\Erik\Kleiner Park- Boiso\2012PMBaseline.syn Queues With -Project 1: E Fairview Ave & Records Ave 2012 PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations 1- .................. fl * o6 4 r 11 r Volume (vph) 65 1015 150 1155 385 1 125 1 58 Lane Group Flow (vph) 71 1250 163 1255 209 210 136 1 63 Turn Type Prot Prot Split Perm Split Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20,0 20.0 20.0 8.0 8.0 Total Split (s) 11.0 40.0 20.0 49.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 8.0 8.0 Total Split (%) 12.20A 44.4% 22.2% 54.4% 24.4% 24.4% 24.4% 8.9% 8.9% Yellow Time (a) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 010 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lag _ Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C -Max None C -Max Max Max Max None None v/c Ratio 0.55 0.61 0.59 0.69 0.59 0.59 0.31 0,01 0.29 Control Delay 52.9 6.6 43.7 19.3 40.3 40.3 7.6 42.0 3.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 52.9 6,6 43.7 19.3 40.3 40.3 7.8 42.0 3.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 44 18 85 282 115 115 0 1 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m74 35 149 362 194 195 46 6 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1942 1237 687 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 Base Capacity (vph) 134 2046 306 1806 354 356 440 76 218 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spiilback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.53 0.61 0.53 0.69 0.59 0.59 0.31 0.01 0.29 Ipte[sect(igSufpma Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 88 (98%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and B:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 01)[1W dllu rll"Uo. i.I1mv,on 1- .................. -41 * o6 o4 tom_ 03 o2 2 'd r08 s7 EMP Synchro 7 - Report 10/2/2009 S:\Eril(\Kleiner Park- Boise\2012PMWith-Projectsyn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis With -Project 1: E Fairview Ave & Records Ave 2012 PM Peak Hour Lane Configuratlot Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frl Flt Protected Said, Flow (prot) Fit Permitted 65 1015 135 150 1155 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0,91 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1719 4853 1719 3438 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1719 4853 1719 3438 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adi, Flow (vph) 71 1103 147 163 1255 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 19 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 71 1231 0 163 1255 0 Turn Type Prot 0.95 0.95 Prot 0.95 31.7 Protected Phases 7 4 1538 3 8 1538 Permitted Phases 0.95 1.00 0.95 2.6 1.00 1633 Actuated Green, G (s) 5.6 36.0 36.6 15.3 45.7 0.92 Effective Green, g (s) 5.6 36.0 0.92 15.3 45.7 136 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.40 0 0.17 0.51 0 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 D Vehlcle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 365 1 125 1 0 58 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0,95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.66 1.00 1.00 1,00 0.85 1.00 Uniform Delay, dl 0.85 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 31.7 1.00 1633 1638 1538 1719 1.00 1538 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 2.6 1.00 1633 1638 1538 1719 36.6 1538 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 416 1 136 1 0 63 0 0 107 0 0 61 209 210 Split 2 2 19.5 1915 19.5 1915 0.22 0.22 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 107 1941 292 1746 354 355 We Ratio Prot 0,04 0.25 c0.09 c0.37 0.13 c0.13 We Ratio Perm We Ratio 0.66 0.63 0.56 0.72 0.59 0.59 Uniform Delay, dl 41.3 21.7 34.3 17.2 31.7 31.7 Progression Factor 0.97 . 0.27 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 12.3 1.3 2.3 2.6 7.1 7.1 Delay (s) 52.1 7.1 36.6 1918 38.7 38.7 Level of Service D A D B D D Approach Delay (s) 9.5 21.7 36.3 Approach LOS A 0 D HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 19.7 HCM Level of Service 0.63 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 62.9% ICU Level of Service 15 Perm 2 19.5 19.5 0.22 4.0 3.0 333 0.02 0.09 28.2 1,00 0.5 28.7 C 1:1 1 Split 6 3.2 3.2 0.04 4.0 61 0,00 0,02 41.9 1,00 0.1 42.0 D 0 Perm 6 6 3.2 3.2 0.04 4.0 3.0 42.2 D 55 c0.00 0.04 41.9 1.00 0.3 42,2 D EMP Synchro 7 - Report 10/2/2009 S:IErildKleiner Park - Boise12012PMWith-Pro)ect.syn HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis With -Project 2: E Fairview Ave & Venture St 2012 PM Peak Hour Configurations_ LaneLanee 592 592 16 16 1004 520 27 35 16 Volume (veh/h) 15 1090 15 15 1385 17 10 5 10 10 5 17 Sign Control 0 Free 18 11 Free cSH Stop 1700 1700 Stop 0% 703 Grade Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0% 0.92 0.92 0,92 0% 0.92 0.92 0.92 0% 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 16 1185 16 16 1505 18 11 5 11 11 6 18 Pedestrians 13.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.0 0.0 21.2 29.6 Lane LOS B Lane Width (ft) B C D Approach Delay (s) 0.2 Walking Speed (f /s) 0.1 21.2 29.6 Percent Blockage C D Approach LOS Right turn flare (veh) r jntersection Bummary � x - Average Delay 0.7 Median type Intersection Capacity Uilr7ation TWLTL 48.80/a TWLTL Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) Median storage veh) 15 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) 1317 0.76 0,76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 pX, platoon unblocked 1524 1201 2024 2774 592 2186 2781 762 vC, conflicting volume 1217 1217 1547 1547 vci, stage 1 cont vol 807 1557 639 1234 vC2, stage 2 cont vol 1524 635 1717 2703 0 1930 2712 762 vCu, unblocked vol 4.2 4.2 7.6 6.6 7.0 7.6 6.6 7,0 tC, single (s) 6.6 5.6 6.6 5.6 tC, 2 stage (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 IF (s) p0 queue free % 96 98 95 96 99 90 96 95 cM capacity (veh/h) 419 703 202 129 817 109 139 341 Volume Total 16 592 592 16 16 1004 520 27 35 Volume Left 16 0 0 0 16 0 0 11 11 Volume Right 0 0 0 16 0 0 18 11 18 cSH 419 1700 1700 1700 703 1700 1700 249 181 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.35 0.35 0.01 0.02 0.59 0.31 0,11 0.19 Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 9 17 Control Delay (s) 13.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.0 0.0 21.2 29.6 Lane LOS B B C D Approach Delay (s) 0.2 0.1 21.2 29.6 C D Approach LOS r jntersection Bummary � x - Average Delay 0.7 Intersection Capacity Uilr7ation 48.80/a ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 EMP Synchro7- Report 10/2/2009 S:1Erik\Kleiner Park - Bolset2012PMWith-Project.syn Queues MTC Build -Out With -Project 1: E Fairview Ave & Records Ave 2012 PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations V1 tn I ttf if 4i.�i W 01 - Iw °4 _ n 05 i 06 26� - _• _ 25� - A 07 36s_ Volume (vph) 249 1105 140 1305 245 385 16 416 15 311 Lane Group Flow (vph) 271 1359 152 1418 266 428 135 462 17 346 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 810 8.0 8.0 Total Split (s) 36,0 67.0 26.0 57.0 57,0 29.0 24,0 33.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 24.0% 44.7% 17.3% 38.0% 38.0% 19.3% 16.0% 22.0% 18.7% 18.7% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3,5 3.5 3,5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.0 4,0 Load/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Made None C -Max None C -Max C -Max Max Max None None None v/c Ratio 0.85 0.63 0.60 0.71 0.37 0.77 0.43 0.82 0.07 0.68 Control Delay 76.6 10.2 70,9 40.8 13.5 70.0 18.1 72.5 55.3 12.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 76.6 10.2 70.9 40.8 13.5 70.0 18.1 72.5 553 12.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 193 86 141 428 60 209 16 226 15 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) ml 64 m92 220 522 .144 272 83 284 38 97 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1942 1237 687 1910 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 Base Capacity (vph) 368 2169 252 2006 726 556 311 645 290 537 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spiliback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.74 0.63 0.60 0.71 0.37 0.77 0.43 0.72 0.06 0.64 In<ereohe4 Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 12 (8"/0), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and e:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated m Volume for 95th percentile queue Is metered by upstream signal. ... _. • .-..- ,. n... n n ..I- A.,.. J Zits Ulm rnabuo. t 02 4i.�i W 01 - Iw °4 _ 03 05 i 06 26� - _• _ 25� - A 07 36s_ 08 57sh EMP Synchro 7 - Report 10/2/2009 S:\Erik\Kleiner Park- Boise\2012PMMTCBuiidWith-Project.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis MTC Build -Out With -Project 1: E Fairview Ave & Records Ave 2012 PM Peak Hour HCM Average Control Delay 40.9 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 150.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71,5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 249 1105 145 140 1305 245 385 16 105 416 15 311 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0,91 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.OD 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow (prof) 1719 4854 1719 4940 1536 3335 1574 3335 1810 1538 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 a95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow(perm) 1719 4654 1719 4940 1538 3335 1574 3335 1810 1538 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 .0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 271 1201 158 152 1418 266 428 18 117 462 17 346 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 0 102 0 101 0 0 0 299 Lane Group Flow (vph) 271 1348 0 152 1418 164 428 34 0 462 17 47 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (a) 27.8 66.7 22.0 60.9 8 60.9 25.0 20.0 25.3 20.3 6 20.3 Effective Green, g (s) 27.8 66.7 22,0 60.9 60.9 25.0 20.0 25.3 20.3 20.3 Actuated g/CRatio 0.19 0.44 0,15 0.41 0.41 0.17 0.13 0.17 0.14 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 319 2158 252 2006 624 556 210 563 245 208 v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 0.28 0.09 c0.29 c0.13 0.02 c0.14 0.01 We Ratio Perm 0.11 0.03 We Ratio 0.85 0.62 0.60 0.71 0.26 0.77 0.16 0.82 0.07 0.23 Uniform Delay, di 59.1 32.0 59.9 37,1 29.6 59.7 57.6 60.2 56.6 57.8 Progression Factor 1.17 0.31 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 M 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 6.0 0.4 4.0 2.1 1.0 9.9 1.6 9.3 0.1 0.6 Delay (s) 75.1 10.2 63.9 39.2 30.7 69.6 59.2 69.5 56.7 58.4 Level of Service E B E D C E E E E E Approach Delay (s) 20.9 40.0 67.1 64.6 Approach LOS C D E E HCM Average Control Delay 40.9 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 150.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71,5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group EMP Synchro7- Report 10/212009 S:\EriklKleiner Park- Boise\2012PMMTCBuildWith-Project.syn HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis MTC Build -Out With -Project 2: E Fairview Ave & Venture St 2012 PM Peak Hour } Lane Configurations Vi ttt+ 703 362 16 701 701 374 5 16 Volume (veh/h) 15 1670 10 15 1665 22 5 5 10 25 5 37 Sign Control 0 Free 0 Free 0 Stop 0 11 Stop 0 Grade 23 0% 11 0% 40 0% 334 1700 0% 1700 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 16 1758 11 16 1753 23 5 5 11 27 5 40 Pedestrians 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 6 34 Lane Width (ft) Control Delay (s) 16.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.1 Walking Speed (it/$) 77.1 18.8 Lane LOS C B Percent Blockage D C F C Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.1 Right turn flare (veh) 25.3 40.5 Approach LOS Median type TWLTL TWLTL D E Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (it) 1317 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1776 1768 2453 3602 591 2427 3596 596 vC1, stage 1 cont vol 1795 1795 1796 1796 vC2, stage 2 cont vol 659 1807 631 1800 vCu, unblocked vol 1776 1161 1998 3402 0 1966 3395 596 to, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.6 6.6 7.0 7.6 6.6 7.0 tC, 2 stage (s) 6,6 5.6 6.6 5.6 . tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 95 97 96 94 99 64 76 94 95 91 440 OM capacity (veh/h) 334 475 134 88 879 Volume Total 16 703 703 362 16 701 701 374 5 16 27 46 Volume Left 16 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 5 0 27 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 23 0 11 0 40 cSH 334 1700 1700 1700 475 1700 1700 1700 134 219 76 307 Volume to Capacity 0,05 0.41 0.41 0.21 0.03 0.41 0.41 0.22 0.04 0.07 0.36 0.15 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 6 34 13 Control Delay (s) 16.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.1 22.7 77.1 18.8 Lane LOS C B D C F C Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.1 25.3 40.5 Approach LOS D E Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) EMP 10/2/2009 1.1 47.4% ICU Level of Service 15 A Synchro 7 • Report SAErik\Kleiner Park - Boise\2012PMMTCBuildWith•Project.syn Queues MTC Build -Out With -Project 3: River Valley St & N Eagle Rd 2012 PM Peak Hour -'¢ - r --, 6 r--- 4,_ 4\ t la Lane Configurations Volume(vph) 375 125 130 155 62 85 230 3125 35 241 2330 50 Lane Group Flow (vph) 395 132 137 163 65 89 242 3157 37 254 2354 53 Perm Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot i 6 Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 Switch Phase 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Initial (s) BA 20.0 20.0 , 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20A Minimum Split (s) 21.0 25.0 25.0 16.0 20.0 20.0 21.0 94.0 94.0 15.0 88.0 88.0 Total Split (s) 14.0% 16.7% 16.7% 10.7% 13.3% 13.3% 14.0% 62.7% 62.7% 10.6% 58.7% 58.7% Total Split (°/a) 3,5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3,5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Yellow Time (s) 015 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 All -Red Time (a) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 010 0.0 Last Time Adjust (a) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None C -Max C -Max None C -Max C -Max W Ratio ` 1.04 0.64 0.46 0.65 0.48 0,45 0.71 1.01 0.04 1.04 0,79 0.06 Control Delay 121.0 77.9 14.0 80.0 77.0 18.9 81.7 20.8 0.0 132.9 26.1 3.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 132.9 0.0 26.1 0.0 3.7 Total Delay 121.0 77.9 14.0 80.0 77.0 18.9 81.7 112 20.8 0 -137 621 0 Queue Length 50th (ft) -215 126 0 80 121 62 111 0 55 m88 -1076 m391 m0 #231 755 21 Queue Length 95th (ft) #325 195 64 2544 1640 Internal Link Dist (it) 8B1 200 200 1227 200 300 500 300 500 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 253 333 267 193 244 382 3120 985 245 2973 947 Base Capacity(vph) 378 0 0 0 0 0 0 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Splllback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reducin 0 0 0 0 0.61 0 0.34 0 0.36 0 0.63 0 1,01 0 0.04 1.04 0.79 0,06 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.04 0.52 0.41 Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 69 (46%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle; 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically Infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. If 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue maybe longer. Queue shown Is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue Is metered by upstream signal. EMPSynchro 7 - Report 10/2/2009 S:\Erik\KleinerPaik-Boise\2Oi2PMMTCBuildWith-Project-syn Queues MTC Build -Out With -Project 3: River Valley St & N Eagle Rd 2012 PM Peak Hour EMPSynchro 7 - Report 10/2/2009 SAENMIeiner Park- Boise\2012PMMTCBuildWith-Project.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis MTC Build -Out With -Project 3: River Valley St & N Eaqle Rd 2012 PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations 11 t 0.97 Actuated Cycle Length (s) + r )I Tft r psi ftt If Volume (vph) 375 125 130 155 62 85 230 3125 35 241 2330 50 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.o 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1,00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0,91 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0,95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 3335 1810 1538 3395 1810 1538 3335 4940 1538 3335 4940 1538 Fit Permitted 0,95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said Flow (perm) 3335 1810 1538 3335 1810 1538 3335 4940 1538 3335 4940 1538 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.99 0.95 0.95 0,99 0.95 Adj, Flow (vph) 395 132 137 163 65 89 242 3157 37 254 2354 53 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 121 0 0 82 0 0 14 0 0 21 Lane Group Flow (vph) 395 132 16 163 65 7 242 3157 23 254 2354 32 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.0 17,0 17.0 11.3 11.3 11.3 15.4 94.7 94.7 11.0 90.3 90.3 Effective Green, g (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 11.3 11.3 11.3 15,4 94.7 94.7 11.0 90.3 90.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.63 0.63 0.07 0.60 0.60 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 378 205 174 251 136 116 342 3119 971 245 2974 926 We Ratio Prot c0.12 cO.07 0.05 0.04 0.07 cO.64 co.08 0,48_ We Ratio Perm 0.01 OM 0.02 0.02 v/0 Ratio 1.04 0.64 0.09 0.65 0.48 0,06 0.71 1.01 0.02 1.04 0.79 0.03 Uniform Delay, di 66.5 63.6 59.6 67.4 66.5 64,4 65.1 27.6 10.4 69.5 22.7 12.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 124 0.38 OM 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 58.5 6.8 0.2 5.7 2.6 0.2 0.6 8.3 0.0 67.4 2,2 0.1 Delay (s) 125.0 70.4 59.6 73.1 69.2 64.6 81.4 18.9 0.1 136.9 24.9 12.2 Level of Service F E E E E E F B A F C B Approach Delay (s) 100.7 69.9 23.1 35.4 Approach LOS F E C D ................ _..... HCM Average Control Delay 37.1 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 150.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group EMP Synchro7- Report 1012/2009 SAErMI(leiner Park- Boise\2012PMMTCBuildWith-Project.syn Queues MTC Build -Out No Park 1: E Fairview Ave & Records Ave 2012 PM Peak Hour areConflgurations r.1 c raIM.11 w 01 '--1w m4 't{ m3 Volume (vph) 195 1105 140 1305 245 385 15 415 15 260 Lane Group Flow (vph) 212 1359 152 1418 266 428 134 461 17 289 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 6 Permitted Phases $ 1 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 5 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4,0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8,0 8.0 8.0 Total Split (s) 33.0 65.0 26.0 58,0 58.0 31.0 26.0 33.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 22.0% 43.3% 17.3% 36.7% 36.7% 20.7°/% 17.3% 22.0% 18.7% 183% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3,5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3,5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) D,5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 U 010 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None C -Max None C -Max C -Max Max Max None None None v/c Ratio 0.80 0.65 0.60 0.68 0.35 0.71 0.41 0.82 0.07 0.63 Control Delay 79.8 10.4 70.9 38.3 12.6 65.3 16.9 72.5 55.3 12.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 Total Delay 79.8 10.4 70.9 38.3 12.6 65.3 16.9 72.5 55.3 12.4 Queue Length 50th (it) 161 84 141 412 56 205 15 226 15 0 Queue Length 95th (it) m130 220 140 267 283 89 Link Dist (ft) 1942 1236 6787 19180 Internal Turn Bay Length (it) 200 200 200 200 200 200 Base Capacity (vph) 332 2105 252 2092 751 600 330 645 290 489 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Splllback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0.60 0 0,6B 0 0.35 0 0,71 0 0.41 0 0.71 0 0.06 0.59 Reduced Wo Ratio 0.64 0.65 Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset; 12 (80/6), Referenced to phase 4;EBT and s:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. _. . _ _ . n ^---.A Spins are rnasue: r.1 c raIM.11 w 01 '--1w m4 't{ m3 � 05 06 m7 06 > 33s _� I_` - EMP Synchro 7 - Report 10/212009 S;\Erik\Kleiner Park - Boise\2012PMMT0Bu1IdNoParlcsyn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis MTC Build -Out No Park 1: E Fairview Ave & Records Ave 2012 PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations "I tt'A Vi W F rill T> 71T1 T f Volume (vph) 195 1105 145 140 1305 245 365 15 105 415 15 260 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0,91 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.o0 1,00 0.85 1,00 0.87 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1,00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1,00 1.00 Said. Flow (prof) 1719 4854 1719 4940 1538 3335 1573 3335 1610 1538 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said, Flow arm 1719 4854 1719 4940 1538 3335 1573 3335 1810 1538 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Ad]. Flow (vph) 212 1201 158 152 1418 266 428 17 117 461 17 289 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 250 Lane Group Flow (vph) 212 1348 0 152 1418 166 428 34 0 461 17 39 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 6 5 2 1 6 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 23.2 64.7 22.0 63,5 8 63.5 27.0 22,0 25.3 20.3 20.3 Effective Green, g (s) 23.2 64.7 22.0 63.5 63.5 27.0 22.0 25.3 20.3 20.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.43 0.15 0.42 0.42 0.18 0.15 0.17 0.14 0.14 Clearance Time (,a) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 266 2094 252 2091 651 600 231 563 245 208 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.28 0.09 c0,29 c0.13 0.02 c0.14 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.03 Wo Ratio 0.80 0.64 0,60 0.68 0,26 0.71 0.15 0.82 0.07 0.19 Uniform Delay, dl 61.1 33.6 59.9 35.0 28.0 57.9 55.8 60.1 56.6 57.5 Progression Factor 1.21 0.29 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1A0 1,00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.6 0.4 4.0 1.8 0.9 7,1 1.3 9.1 0.1 0.4 Delay (s) 78.3 10.3 63.9 36.8 28.9 64.9 57.2 69.2 56.7 58.0 Level of Service E B E D C E E E E E Approach Delay (s) 19.5 37.9 63.1 64.7 Approach LOS B D E E HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 39.1 HCM Level of Service 0.72 150.0 Sum of lost time (s) 64.5% ICU Level of Service 15 D 12.0 C EMP Synchro 7 - Report 10/2/2009 SAEriklKleiner Park - Boise12012PMMTCBuiIdNoPark.syn HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis MTC Build -Out No Park 2: E Fairview Ave & Venture St 2012 PM Peak Hour ,A , --, e -*-- f r� '" 1 41 imytLiflO,M1 703 703 362 701 701 366 5 16 27 Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 15 1670 10 15 1665 15 5 5 10 25 5 30 Sign Control 27 Free/ Volume Left Free Stop 0 Stop Grade Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0°/U 0.95 0.95 0.95 0% 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 16 1758 11 16 1753 16 5 5 11 27 5 33 Pedestrians 0.03 0.41 0.41 0.22 0.04 0.07 0.36 0.13 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 Lane Width (ft) 0 0 3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 32.3 6 22,5 34 76.5 11 19 Walking Speed (it/s) 16.2 0.0 0.0 0,0 12.7 Percent Blockage C Lane LOS C B 0.1 Right turn flare (veh) 43.1 Approach Delay (s) 0.1 Median type TWLTL TWLTL Approach LOS Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) 1317 0.81 0.81 0.81 0,81 0.81 0.81 pX, platoon unblocked Intersection Capacity Utilization 1768 2446 3595 591 2423 3592 592 VC, conflicting volume 1768 Analysis Period (min) 1795 1795 1792 1792 vCi, stage 1 cont vol 651 1800 631 1800 vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1768 1139 1973 3386 0 1945 3383 592 1C, single (s) 4.2 4.2 7.6 6.6 7.0 7.6 6.6 7.0 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.6 3.5 5.6 4.0 3.3 6.6 3.5 5.6 4.0 3.3 IF (s) 2.2 2.2 97 96 94 99 64 94 93 p0 queue free % 95 481 137 89 874 76 96 442 cm capacity (veh/h) 336 r_ n _ 16 703 703 362 16 701 701 366 5 16 27 38 Volume Total 16 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 5 27 0 Volume Left 0 1 0 33 Volume Right 336 1700 1700 1700 481 1700 1700 1700 137 222 76 292 oSH Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.41 0.41 0.21 0.03 0.41 0.41 0.22 0.04 0.07 0.36 0.13 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 0 0 0 3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 32.3 6 22,5 34 76.5 11 19 Control Delay (s) 16.2 0.0 0.0 0,0 12.7 C Lane LOS C B 0.1 25.0 43.1 Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0 E Approach LOS Average Delay 1.0 A Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.2% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 EMP Synchro7- Report 10/2!2009 SAEMAKlelner Park- Boise12012PMMTCBuiidNoPark.syn Queues MTC Build -Out No Park 3: River Valle St & N Ea le Rd 2012 PM Peak Hour Lane Configurations + it 11 T r 11 230 TTT 3125 r 35 .r -r 230 1-1_1 2330 50 Volume (vph) 375 125 130 155 60 80 84 242 3157 37 242 2354 53 Lane Group Flow (vph) 395 132 137 163 63 Prot Perm Prot Perm Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm 1 6 Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 Switch Phase - 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum initial (s) Minimum Split (s) 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20,0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 21.0 25.0 25.0 16.0 20.0 20,0 20.0 95.0 95.0 14,0 89.0 89.0 Total Split (%n) 14,0% 16.7% 16.7% 10.7% 13,3% 133% 13.3% 633% 63.3% 9.3% 59,3% 593% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3,5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.5 0,5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0,5 0,5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 Lag 4.0 Lag 4.0 Lead 4,0 Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Yes Lead Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes None Yes None None None None None None C -Max C -Max None C -Max C -Max Recall Mode ` 1,04 0.64 0,46 0,65 0.47 0.44 0.71 1.00 0,04 1,09 0.79 0.06 v/CRatio Control Delay 121.0 781 14.1 80.0 76.5 19.2 81.6 16.5 0.0 148.9 25.8 3.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 121,0 7BA 14.1 80.0 76.5 19.2 81.6 16.5 0.0 148.9 25.8 3.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) --215 126 0 80 60 0 112 -999 0 -136 621 0 Queue Length 95th (h) #325 195 64 121 108 54 m89 2544 mo #228 742 20 Internal Link Dist (it) 881 1227 500 300 1640 500 Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 193 200 239 300 365 3154 996 222 2981 949 Base Capacity (vph) 378 253 333 267 0 0 0 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0.61 0 0.33 0 0.35 0 0.66 0 1.00 0.04 1,09 0.79 0.06 Reduced We Ratio 1.04 0.52 0.41 Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 69 (46%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically Infinite. Queue shown Is maximum after two cycles. It 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue maybe longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. EMP Synchro 7 - Report 10/2/2009 S:1Eril(Weiner Park- Boise12012PMMTCBuildNoPark.syn Queues MTC Build -Out No Park 3: River Valley St & N Eagle Rd 2012 PM Peak Hour RnIIte and PhaGea, 3, Rivnr Vallev St & N Eaole Rd (`' 02 iIr o3 I—,* M 1AsE= 113s—g= 2 4N 05 � 06 o7 08 29,T17 EMP Synchro 7 - Report 10/2/2009 SAErIkNoiner Park - Boise\2012PMMTCBuiIdNoPark.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis MTC Build -Out No Park 3: River Valley St & N Eagle Rd 2012 PM Peak Hour G Critical Lane Group EMP Synchro7- Report 10/2/2009 SAErMKlelner Park - Boise\2012PMMTCBuIIdNoPark.syn n t r M t r Tft Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 375 125 130 155 60 80 230 3125 35 230 2330 50 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Utii. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.65 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1100 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1A0 1100 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (pro/) 3335 1810 1538 3335 1810 1538 3335 4940 1538 3335 4940 1538 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1,00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow(Perm) 3335 1810 1538 3335 1810 1538 3335 4940 1536 3335 4940 1538 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 a95 0.99 0.95 0.95 0.99 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 395 132 137 163 63 84 242 3157 37 242 2354 53 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 121 0 0 78 0 0 13 0 0 21 Lane Group Flow (vph) 395 132 16 163 63 6 242 3157 24 242 2354 32 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Farm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 17.0 17.0 4 17.0 11.3 11.3 B 11.3 15.2 95.7 2 95.7 10.0 90.5 90,5 Effective Green, 9 (s) 17,0 17.0 17.0 11.3 11.3 11.3 15.2 95.7 95.7 10.0 90.5 90.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.64 0.64 0.07 0.60 0.60 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extensions 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 378 205 174 251 136 116 338 3152 981 222 2980 928 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 c0.07 0.05 0.03 0.07 c0.64 c0.07 0.48 We Ratio Perm 0.01 0.09 0.65 0.46 0.00 0.05 0.72 1,00 0.02 0.02 1.09 0.79 0.02 0.03 v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 1.04 66.5 0.64 63.6 59.6 67.4 66.4 64.4 65.3 27,1 10.0 70.0 22.5 12.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.23 0.36 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 58.5 6.8 0.2 5.7 2.5 0.2 0.7 5.2 0.0 86.5 2.2 0.1 Delay (s) 125.0 70.4 59.8 73.1 68.9 64.6 81.2 14.8 0.0 156.5 24.8 12.1' Level of Service F E E E E E F B A F C B Approach Delay (s) 100.7 70.0 19.3 36.5 Approach LOS F E B D Infef'seottonxSGtijMary 'z � : � _ HCM Average Control Delay 35.7 NCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 150.0 Sum of lost time (a) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 G Critical Lane Group EMP Synchro7- Report 10/2/2009 SAErMKlelner Park - Boise\2012PMMTCBuIIdNoPark.syn HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis MTC Build -Out With -Project 4: Park Rd & Records Ave 2012 PM Peak Hour lane Configuratlons I T t T* I ll� I Volume (veh1h) 137 7 207 39 8 6 175 263 56 11 207 276 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 149 8 225 42 9 7 190 286 61 12 225 300 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (fils) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 1220 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 926 976 225 1174 1246 316 525 347 vCi, stage 1 cant vol vC2, stage 2 cont vol vCu, unblocked vol 926 976 225 1174 1246 316 525 347 to, single (s) 7,1 6,5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 to, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 25 96 72 57 94 99 81 99 cm capacity (veh/h) 198 200 807 99 138 717 1027 1196 Di�ecticr%Lane7E�. '= EB1�._EB'2r WB1 W62� N6!1 'N62� t;S81- lSB2 .SBS -rt Volume Total 149 233 42 15 190 347 12 225 300 Volume Left 149 0 42 0 190 0 12 0 0 Volume Right 0 225 0 7 0 61 0 0 300 cSH 198 734 99 211 1027 1700 1196 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.75 0.32 0.43 0.07 0.19 0,20 0.01 0.13 0.18 Queue Length 95th (ft) 125 34 45 6 17 0 1 0 0 Control Delay (s) 63.8 12.2 66.0 23.3 9.3 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS F B F C A A Approach Delay (s) 32.3 54.7 3.3 0.2 Approach LOS D F Average Delay 11.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 EMP Synchro 7 - Report 3/1/2010 S:\Erik\Kleiner Park- Boise\January2010wParkLn\2012PMMTCBuildWith-ProjectSingWB+SBR.syn HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis MTC Build -Out With-Project 2012 PM Peak Hour 18: Park Lane & Records Ave 4, 4, t ? Lane Configurations Volume (uehlh) .t. 31 35 460, 11 1'0' 448 Sign Control Sloop Free Free GO$ Areae Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0,92 0,92 0.92 0,92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 34 38 499 12 11 4B2 Pedestrians LarroWldth (ft) Walking Speed (ftls) pa(7@titBlockago Right turn flare (veh) None: None Median type Median storage veh) Upstream slgpal (ft) 743 pX, platoon unblocked 541 vo, corrflicling;volume 1.008 505 voi, stage 1 cont vol vC2,.stage 2 conf vol 511 vCu, unblocked vol 1008 505 41 1.0,single (a) 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) 3.5 3i3' 2 2 1F (0) p0 queue free % 87 93 99 1039, Qm06peclty(vehih) 2&0 664 Te tLon Zane. U�B1. N6 _Sdtj '. SBr2 Volume Total 72 511, 19 482 Volume Left 34 0 11 0 0 Volume Right 36' 12 cSH 364 1700 1039 1700 Volume: to Capacity 0'20 0.801 0.01 0.28 Queue Length 95th (ft) 18 0 1 0 Control Delay ('9) 17.3 OcO: 8,5 010 Lane LOS Approach' Delay (s) C 17.$' 0,0 A 012 Approach LOS 0 trtersecll6h Sftomar Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization 1.2 35.49r ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 A Synohro 7 - Report EMP 2126/2010 S:\Erik\Kleiner Park -BoiseWanuary2010wParkLn\2012PMMTCBuildWith-ProjectNoTWL syn IHTf' RSEi r(If- f -A Roundabout Vehicle Movements Dem Plow n Deg of Ave Mov ID Turn (veh/h) /oHV Satn Dela (v/c) (sec) WB Park Rd 95"/° Aver el of Back of Prop. Eff. Stop Speed vice Queue Queued Rate (mph) (ft) 6T T 14 7.1 0.015 0.4 LOS A 2 0.17 0.06 24.4 6R R 1 50.0 0.015 1.8 LOS A 2 0.17 0.23 23.8 Approach 16 12.5 0.015 0.6 LOS A 2 0.17 0.08 24.3 SS North Loop - 71- L 1 50.0 0.036 6.2 LOS A 6 0.14 0.52 22.2 4R R 39 5.1 0.036 1.7 LOS A 6 0.14 0.21 23.9 Approach 41 7.3 0.036 2.0 LOS A 6 0.14 0.23 23.8 EB Park Rd 5L L 47 4.3 0.035 6.6 LOS A 6 0.02 0.57 21.5 2T T 8 12.5 0.035 0.1 LOS A 6 0.02 0.01 24.9 Approach 54 S.6 0.035 5.7 LOS A 6 0.02 0.48 22.0 All Vehicles 111 7.2 0.036 3.6 LOS A 6 0.08 0.33 23.0 Symbols which may appear In this table Following Degree of Saturation # x = 1.00 for Short Lane with resulting Excess Flow * x = 1.00 due to minimum capacity Following LOS # - Based on density for continuous movements Following Queue # - Density for continuous movement Site: 3-1-eg Park S:\Erik\Kleiner Park - Boise\KleinerPark.aap Processed Sep 25, 2009 02:42:32PM A0821, Parametrix, Inc., Small Office Produced by SIDRA Intersection 3.1.061208.34 Copyright 2000-2006 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd www. s i d ra s o l ut i o n s. con CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE REPORT DATE: April 9, 2010 E TO: Steve Steve Siddoway, Meridian Parks & Recreation IDAHO FROM: Sonya Watters, Associate City Planner SUBJECT: Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park —CZC-10-M/DES-10-013 Pik Gln, fivreS OWNER: Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST The applicant, Steve Siddoway, Meridian Parks & Recreation, requests Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) and Design Review (DES) approval for construction of the following ancillary structures at Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park: trash enclosures (where occur), (1) entry feature, (2) 2,000 square foot signature picnic facilities, (2) small restrooms, (1) large restroom, (1) concession building, (1) band shell, and (1) maintenance building. The overall design of the park site and landscaping was previously reviewed and approved with CZC-10- 018 and DES -10-012. The subject CZC is only for the previously mentioned structures located on the park site. The library and senior center (and possibly another restroom facility and picnic shelter) will be approved with subsequent CZC's. The site is located off the north east corner of E. Fairview Avenue and N. Eagle Road. DECISION The applicant's request for CZC & DES is approved with the conditions listed in this report. Note: This is not a building permit Prior to any construction, you should contact Building Services at (208)887-22]Tto verify if any additional permits and/or inspections will be required. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. The landscape plan prepared by Parametrix on 3/10/10, labeled Sheets LSl-LS4, is approved (stamped "approved" on 3/9/10 by the City of Meridian Planning Department) with no changes. 2. The elevations prepared by Parametrix on 3/10/10, are approved (stamped "approved" on 3/10/10 by the City of Meridian Planning Department) with no changes. 3. The elevations are not to be altered without prior written approval of the City of Meridian Planning Department. Process Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall pay any applicable impact fees prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. If any changes must be made to the site plan to accommodate ACHD requirements, the applicant shall submit a new site plan to the City of Meridian Planning Department for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Conditions Document 1 Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC 3. The applicant shall complete all required improvements prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. It is unlawful to use or occupy any building or structure until the Building Official has issued a Certificate of Occupancy. Ongoing Conditions of Approval 1. The project is subject to all current City of Meridian ordinances and previous conditions of approval associated with this site ([add all applicable development applications]). 2. The issuance of this CZC does not release the applicant from any previous requirements of the other permits issued for the site. 3. The applicant has a continuing obligation to comply with the outdoor lighting provisions as set forth in UDC 11-3A-11. 4. The applicant and/or property owner shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain all landscaping and constructed features within the clear vision triangle consistent with the standards in UDC 11-3A-3. A. Vicinity Map B. Trash Enclosure (dated 3/10/10) C. Entry Feature (dated 3/10/10) D. Signature Picnic Facility (dated 3/10/10) E. Small Restroom Facility (dated 3/10/10) F. Large Restroom Facility (dated 3/10/10) G. Concessions (dated 3/10/10) H. Band Shell (dated 3/10/10) I. Maintenance Building (dated 3/10/10) Conditions Document 2 Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park CZC Exhibit A — Vicinity Map 1 FERNLUF OR W MRAAS CR W GRANGER AVE W GUNSWKE ST w-- w W USTICK-RD W MCN ST i ST W RACE STS Y W RACCI ST zl 4 P3i J z zl 9 WABMMCT WGMNGERST ggqppp z 1 WPA MST WTAHITI ST -- Q W R0WA>DN7 Si ,N ApNT w —' a K Y JW a r V z W KRiG STI zi 5 EW AVE �I N W ATURE ORI 111 1'— W IRVMG ST z I ml Cloverdale lale2l WG VLpV�E 5T W SUNN'tOALE LN I Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park— Park Structures CZC Conditions Document Exhibit B — Trash Enclosure (dated: 3/10/10) E— — ii N& ELEVATI ON - SIDE ELEVATION - FRONT 3 ELEVATION - SIDE ELEVATION - REAR 5 x.=�.:.z .��...� NOTFOR Conditions Document a. FLOOR -PLAN .-__.e11 rw'�°ncinwiaw or - II TRASH ENCLOSURE 'I Al Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park—Park Structures CZC Exhibit C - Entry Feature (dated 3/10/10) NOTFOR Conditions Document 2 PLAN - ENTRY ENTRY FEATURE Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park—Park Structures CZC A2 Exhibit D - Signature Picnic Facility (dated 3/10/10) Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park—Park Structures CZC r - 1 ELEVATION - FRONT &REAR x n fnY l 2 ELEVATION - SIDE NOTPOR -xu�n rx.xwxenxcxdau rux SIGNATURE PICNIC FACILITY A4 PAN:XW DRAFT :�sr_.... _ _ www Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park—Park Structures CZC Exhibit E - Small Restroom Facility (dated 3/10/10) 4 x ...a NOTFOR Conditions Document FLOOR PLAN SMALL RESTROOM CZC Julius M Kleiner Memorial Pazk—Park SitaciuTes Exhibit F - Large Restroom Facility (dated 3/10/10) 4ttcVA''oA - i F1OOft PLAN 5 EEEVATION - SIDE 3c cwapn-rnoni L v.nc .._.... NOTFOR� ruwwariurc SACT -. LARGE RESTROOM AS Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park— Park Structures CZC Exhibit G - Concessions (dated 3/10/10) I ", -- ------------1 pi T 141 1 II 4 ELEVATION - SIDE 2 ELEVATION - FRONT � FLOOR PLAN Y✓ _ F CJ EELEEyATION - SIDE 3ELEVATION REAR .�..__. ,.,., NOTFON ®.`,Ev /®i '_ m .... n�aww.xw •+Mrn wwuun CONCESSIONS ................ ... ... DRAFT A7 I/�': _. .- ••' ._„ _ CONSiNOCt1ON -_ Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park—Park Structures CZC Exhibit H - Band Shell (dated 3/10/10) ?�m.e ELEVATION -SIDE NO,. ELEVATIH - FRONT NOTFg1 __IL..`tiu�rtuan... II HAND SHELL AID I D ,RAFT ___ Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park—Park Structures CZC Exhibit I - Maintenance Building (dated 3/10/10) Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park — Park Structures CZC — a -n..r..� 1ELEVATION -SIDE J !t 3 �_ w..�........ ....vm.....- ? ELEVATION FRONT vuewZ _ xmeon .MAINTENANCE BWLDING Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park — Park Structures CZC Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park— Park Structures CZC i t {{ N ELEVATION 610E 3 FLOOR PLAN r 2 ELEVATION - REAR NOTFOR .•— m'urze,iowio a MAINTENANCE vAld Dp/L � F BUILDING _ Conditions Document Julius M Kleiner Memorial Park— Park Structures CZC E I Planning Department AWTNISTRATIVE REVIEW APPLICATION Type of Review Requested (check all that apply) ❑ Accessory Use ❑ Alternative Compliance ❑+ Certificate of Zoning Compliance ❑ Certificate of Zoning Compliance Verification ❑ Conditional Use Permit Minor Modification []'Design Review ❑Private Street ❑ Property Boundary Adjustment ❑ Time Extension (Director) ❑ Vacation ❑ Other STAFF USE ONLY: File number(s): 19 Project name:. juEas M.g e.! e, MemoriM a.a'dt=-... Date filed: °�`"' _� 10 Date complete: Assigned Planner: �5r%4&,"-w- Related files: t", 10 — OC � Applicant Information Applicantname: Steve Siddowav Meridian Parks &Recreation Phone: 208-888-3579 Applicant address: 33 E Broadway Ave. Meridian, ID Zip: 83642 Applicant's interest in property: []Own ❑ Rent ❑ Optioned ❑ Other Owner name: Julius M. I{leiner Memorial Park Phone: 208-466-9264 Owner address: 217 W. Georgia Ave., Ste 100 Nampa, ID Zip: 83686 Agent name (e.g., architect, engineer, developer, representative): Engmeer Firm name: Parametrix Phone: 208-898-0012 Address: 7761 W. Riverside Dr., Ste 201 Boise, ID Zip: 83714 Primary contact is: []Applicant ❑ Owner ❑i Agent ❑ Other Contact name: Dave Meldrum Phone: 208-898-0012 E-mail: dmeldrum(@,Paranietrix.com Fax: 208-947-1655 Subject Property Information Location/street address: NE comer of Fairview Avenue & Eagle Road Assessor's parcel number(s): S 1104314800 and S1104438620 Township, range, section: Township 3N, Range IE Total acreage: 60.0 acres Current land use: Agriculture Current zoning district: Rural Urban Transition (RUT) 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 a Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 o Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 a Website: www.meridiancity.org 1 (Reit 1114(08) Project Description Project/subdivision name: Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park General description of proposed projecthequest; Developing a 60 -acre park, as a memorial to Mr. Julius K16iner, and donate to the City of Meridian as a City park. Proposed zoning distriet(s): Acres of each zone proposed: 60.0 acres Type of use proposed (check all that apply): ❑ Residential ❑Commercial ❑Office ❑Industrial 00ther Amenities provided with this development (if applicable): Library, Senior Center, Picnic Shelters, Rec Complex Who will own & maintain the pressurized irrigation system in this development? City of Meridian Which irrigation district does this property lie within? Nampa Meridian Irrigation District Primary irrigation source: Surface Water Secondary: Groundwater Square footage of landscaped areas to be irrigated (if primary or secondary point of connection is City water): Residential Project Summary (if applicable) Number of residential units: Number of building lots: Number of common and/or other lots: Proposed number of dwelling units (for multi -family developments only): 1 Bedroom: 2 or more Bedrooms: Minimum square footage of structure(s) (excl. garage): Minimum property size (s.f): Gross density (DU/acre-total land): Percentage of open space provided: Proposed building height: _ Average property size (s.f.): Net density (DU/acre-excluding roads & alleys): Acreage of open space: Percentage of useable open space: (See Chapter 3, Article G, for qualified open space) Type of open space provided in acres (i.e., landscaping, public, common, etc): Type of dwelling(s) proposed; ❑ Single-family ❑ Townhomes ❑Duplexes ❑Multi -family Non-residential Project Summary (if applicable) Number of building lots:_ Gross floor area proposed: _ Hours of operation (days and Percentage of site/project devoted to the following: Landscaping: Building: Other lots: Existing (if applicable): Building height: Paving: Total number of employees: Maximum number of employees at any one time: Number and ages of students/children (if applicable): Total number of parking spaces provided: Authorization Print applicant name: Applicant signature: Seating capacity: Number of compact spaces provided: Date: 03/11/10 (' 33 E. BroadwAy Avenue, rte 210 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (268) 884.5533 • Facsimile: 208) 888-6854 e Website: www.meridiancity.org 2 Jo n onArc hitocts A PROFLSMONAL CORPORATION March 31, 2010 Sonya Watters City of Meridian Planning and Zoning 33 E. Broadway Meridian, ID 83642 RE: Design Review Narrative Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park (Park Structures) — Meridian, Idaho Sonya: As part of this overall Certificate of Zoning / Design Review application, we are submitting for your review and approval, the proposed design solutions for the various structures to be'located throughout the Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park. The purpose of this narrative is to address how the design of these structures complies with the guidelines set forth in the Meridian Design Manual and UDC 11-3A-19. This narrative addresses the following structures (see Site Plan furnished by Parametrix for location of structures): • - Trash Enclosures (where occurs) • Entry Feature • Signature Picnic Facility (Typ. of 2 Locations) • Small Restroom (Typ. of 2 Locations) • Large Restroom • Concessions • Band Shell • Maintenance Building Architectural Character/ Color and Materials: The primary architectural characteristic of each of these Park structures is revealed in its simplicity, timelessness, and sustainability in form and in the use of materials and colors. The form and mass of each structure, in general, are quite simple. The interest is created through the use of texture and color of the materials, such as a ground face c.m.u. (exposing aggregate) or a rust -color weathered steel decorative panel. These materials and colors are intended to complement the structures with this natural surrounding; not to hide them or overly accentuate them. They were also considered, because they will withstand the test of time better than other similar options. While each structure is unique in its function, each will employ materials from a common palette and incorporate repeating design elements, thus esthetically connecting each to one another. The proposed material palette is as follows: • . Ground -face CMU (Basalite 615) • Weathered steel (sealed) — decorative panels • Prefinished or painted steel • Parklex (or sim.) high density stratified timber panel • Standing seam metal roofing system with a natural Galvalume finish (all roofs) 440 P_ Corporate Drive, Suite 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642 r (200) 940 9033 , (208) 846 9475 ry www.johnsonerchitects.core Site Plan and Building Locations: By Parametrix under separate application. We believe this application is consistent with the design guidelines set forth in the Meridian Design Manual — C. Urban/Suburban. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding this application. ndgren AIA, Principal Architect ARCHITECTS, PC Julius M. Weiner Memorial Park Project Narrative The Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park is a 60 -acre urban park located to the northeast of the Fairview Avenue/Eagle Road intersection. The Kleiner Park Trust is designing and developing the park that will be deeded to the city upon construction completion as a public Meridian City Park. The Kleiner Park Trust, lead by Julius' son, Eugene Kleiner, is intended to be a legacy in honor of Julius, who escaped from Bolshevik, Russia to the United States in the early 1900's. The park has two large ponds, rolling hills, an arboretum with labyrinth, an active recreation area with decorative splash pad, and an abundance of trees. The site also includes a civic complex featuring a new Meridian Branch Library and Senior Center. The park provides over 3 '/2 miles of pedestrian pathways, and a loop roadway system with a bike lane. The Grand Promenade and Memorial Plaza are the signature park amenities, with colored concrete, pavers, ornamental pedestrian lighting, benches and a bronze statue honoring local businessman and gentleman farmer Julius M. Kleiner. The Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park Master Plan was approved by the Meridian City Council on August 18, 2009. A development agreement modification was approved for the park property by the Meridian City Council on March 2, 2010. The Development Agreement and annexation ordinance were approved by the Meridian City Council on March 9, 2010. A property boundary adjustment may be added to the park, to include tax lot #S1104314800. The lot is currently part of the Redfeather Subdivision, and would add approximately 1.25 acres to the park site. The plans included in this application reflect the additional 1.25 acres. However, if for some reason, the property boundary adjustment does not occur, the overall site plan for the park will not be impacted. For purposes of this Certificate of Zoning Compliance application, we are requesting approval of the overall park site. We have forgone providing final planting and photometric lighting plans in this submittal with the understanding that design has not progressed to that point. When design of these elements is completed, we will provide these documents to the City as a condition of approval. In addition, separate CZC applications will be submitted in the future for the ancillary structures, library and senior center. On March 11, 2010, the Sanitary Service Company approved the cover sheet of the full-size site plan for this submittal. However, minor changes were made to the cover sheet following that approval, and a copy of the original cover sheet is.included with this application. The overall site plan was discussed with Rick Jackson on March 11, 2010, for the Fire Marshall approval. Rick cannot approve any modifications to the International Fire Code. The lane widths in and out of the roundabout on the loop road are less than 20', which is a variation to the IFC. However, the lane widths designed are necessary for a functional roundabout design. Joe Silva is authorized to approve the modifications to the IFC, but was out of town on the 11th and will not return until the 151h. Joe will have a copy of the site plan for his review upon his return. PARAMETRIX 3/11/2010 Page 1 of 1 E IIiDA�R-r- i � FONTION&Toklull Date: 3/4/10 Meridian Development Services Meridian City Hall, Suite 102 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Ph: (208) 887-2211: l=ax: (208) 887-1297' www. m erld I a ncity.org The following property has been researched by The City of Meridian Public Works Department. Project Name: 7ULIUS M. KLEINER MEMORIAL PARK Address: 1900 N. Records Ave. Suite #: Zip Code: 83646 Lot/Block Subdivision: 1) The address has been assigned based on available information. This address should be considered temporary (Development process has not been completed, so the address may change) 2) This address will be required to connect to municipal services. Water and Sewer mains are available for connection to the Municipal System. This property does not currently have services available. (Development process has not been completed) 3) This is an existing structure that is connected to, municipal services. EACH SET OF PLANS WILL BE REQUIRED TO CLEARLY REFLECT THE CORRECT ADDRESS AND SUITE NUMBER (IF APPLICABLE). Terri Ricks Land Development Services tricks@merldlancity.org 11 �, �, JSCS• EY98f) -�{ When Recorded, Mail to: Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley LLP 877 Main Street, Suite 1000 Bofse,adaflo 83702-5884 Aun: Rick Goodson ADA COUNTY RECORDER J. DAVID; BOISE IDAHO 070103 01:40 PM DEPUTY Danielle Bsuleffe RECORDED -REQUEST OF First Arrerlsan ARRO AMOUNT 18,00 Ili Illllli{IIIIII(I(IIIIIIIIII) 111111 106087276 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR "COMER'S USE ONLY SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED In consideration of. Ten and 00/400 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, DAVID B. KLEINER, AS TRUSTEE OF THE 2008 KLEINER FAMILY TRUST U/T/D MARCH 4, 2008 (the "Grantor"), hereby grants and conveys to EUGENE M. KLEINER and MICHAEL E. HUTER, AS CO -TRUSTEES OF THE JULIUS M. KLEINF.R MEMORIAL PARK TRUST U/T/D April 5, 2007, whose address is 217 W. Georgia Ave., Suite 100, Nampa, Idaho 83686 (the "Grantee"), all of Grantor's undivided one-half (1/2) fee interest in and to the real property located in Ada County, Idaho, and described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; TOGETHER with all easements, rights and hereditaments appurtenant thereto and all improvements located thereon; SUBJECT ONLY TO current taxes and assessments; any leases agreed to by the Grantee; any easements, reservations, and restrictions of record to which Grantee's other undivided one- half (1/2) fee interest in said real property is subject, including, without limitation, the reservations, easements, covenants, conditions, restrictions, and other rights or interests identified in Exhibit B attached hereto; and the restrictive covenant and equitable servitude hereby imposed that no portion of the real property conveyed hereby shall be employed for residential or commercial uses; provided, however, said real property may be used as a public park for, recreational purposes, which uses may include, but are not limited to, a care -taker's house, a non-commercial fitness center, swimming pool, aquarium, sports complex which may include but is not limited to soccer, football, lacrosse, baseball and softball fields, senior center, community center, outdoor concerts, and/or library (all of which may include the assessment of nominal user fees which will allow the City of Meridian, Idaho, or any other governmental agency operating such facilities to recover its operating costs as permitted by Idaho law and sell or provide to the public using such facilities refreshments, snacks and meals), season concession stands selling or renting, as the case may be, those products generally sold or rented in public parks, including, but not limited to soft drinks, candy, hot dogs, snow -cones, ice cream, popcorn, and bike, kite and skate rentals, and other similar non-commercial community uses. No portion of the above-described property shall be used for any residential, private commercial, or retail 42340 0003 1262602 1 AIML uses, except for the above-described ancillary uses in connection with public recreational purposes. The Grantor, for itself and for its successors in interest, does by these presents expressly limit the covenants of this Deed to those herein expressed, excludes all covenants arising or to arise by statutory or other implication, and does hereby covenant that against all persons whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim by, through or under the Grantor, and not otherwise, it will warrant and defend the title to the above-described real property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this Special Warranty Deed this day of July, 2008. b C-4 ;7 --- JF�.ifP� DAVID E. KLEINER, AS THE TR STEE OF THE 2008 KLEINER FAMILY TRUST U/T/D MARCH 4, 2008 (t*v- -a STATE OF W*fft F63d A)S-A ) ss. COUNTY OF *H40 ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that DAVID E. KLEINER is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledge it as Trustee of the 2008 KLEINER FAMILY TRUST U/T/D MARCH 4, 2008, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Dated: July 2q , 2008 !� Notary ped or prin ): D,ro �,..n!+++++rrrr Notary blic in and for the State of NO, gaSBQP Residing at: ! se , 1a �! My appointment expires: t D — '% -- I 0 • `o as 2 42340 OD03 1252692 1 0 11 LAND • auras.• Exelx xrtt° 1 •A.eN.,eeNR6 ' EAxo ��JJSG a N�.�r/O 1 er"I4444 ..1OF^r 1199 fast YandinOCrtEthiM . EiOU,Ia • D36'16 t%fx 08d,2tae/246x. • /6.0920 mmresdeign.am einw.aNQul6�.wro );7(F11TB1TA , III o ss[aN [xc. - Boundary Descripilon - • of Naw Parcell• for Meridian Ceutermt" UC Jab No.6077670.00 , Aparcel of land situated in the Southwest quarter and the west hal£oftho southwest quarter, . of the southeast quarter of$eation 4. Township 3 North, Range 1 Past, Boiso lrteaidian; Ada 'County, Idaho, being morayardoalady, deseribed as follows: Corrunencing at a brass cap marking the southynW comer of dectioa 4, Township 3,No[th, Range 1 East. B6tse Meridian, Thane 589°46'17"ll, 265951 felt along the south fins of the sobflmast quarter to a 578 inch mbar marking the southggazieo-seciioaconier of 3ect[on 4; 3Aence 589°4639"B, 664;61 ket alongfhe south line oftho soutbeast gaartw Thenoo N00%3'21"$ S7.14 flet to a 518 inchrebar.marking the southwest edmerdf Vanfure Subdivision, Book 27 of Plats -at Pages 1704 & 1705, records of Ada County, on the north right-of-way line ofUntFaiMew Avenue; Thence1400104'25"$ 7,41.991 feet along the west line of -Venture SubdiVision to the POINT OF BiiGINMNG: . ThencaN89°59129"A;1365:18fmt; Thenco 118,21t feet ona non.-tsagentaurreto thelc% concave westedy, having a - radim of 511.67 feet, a central angle of I3°34' 13", a ohordbeming ofN38°03'12"N and achotd length of t 17.95 tbet, Thmce14(44040,16"W, 649.89 feet; Thence 398.07 feet on it omve to the rigbthaving a radius of 48833 £eet, a caixlrai angle of 46'42'20", a chord bmiag ofN21°19'08^W, and a chord lebgth of387.14 feel • TLence NO2°02'02'8, 720.47'feeq ' _ Tbenco f6,85 feet on actuve t0 the 1eftLaviag a radios of 511.67 feet, a c5ntral•angle - •' of 3053'12", a chard bearing ofN01°05'26'.'13, and a chord leagtlt of 16.85 feet; Thence N00068'50"E,122,63 feet to the north line of thowest half ofthe southwest quarte , TheneaN89°51'01"E, 2033.fmt Pion the with Has of the westbaif of tha soufhwwt quarter to a5/8 inchxebar markingtho southwest comer ofRedfeather ' Estates SubdivisionNo. 7 Hook 96 of Plats at Pages 11865 & 11866, records of Ada .. Ceumy, nnrtthenortltrves[comet of the easthalfbktha southwest qumtw, Page 101`2 V L� Ll E NeW Parcel 2 eontir t ... .. • ThenoeN89°50'47MT t530.69 feet along the south line ofRedfeather Estates • .Subdivision No. •7,the south line ofRpdfbather Estatea Subdivision No. 6, Book 9.6 i of Plats a4Pages I1818 & 1187 9, records of Ada County,aud ibe notch me of th9 ' east balfoftha soidhvtest quaitertn a 5A inch rebarmazkingthe center quarter- - sectioncomer Theden Soo,10'49"49, 1914.74 feat along the eastiina oftho southwest Varier to a 1/2 Prot wbarmarftNg the southvios comerofgoyeaddeadows Subdivision No. 3, Book 24 ofPlets at Pages 1524 & 1525, reeords,of Ada County; ' TbenoeN89°58134^E,662,97feetalongjhe,southllnaof Clo6er Meadows SubdivisienNo.3 to a ll2 lhenorili%vest oornerof Veatme ' Subdivision; Book 27 of Plats at Pages 1704 & 1705 - Thonca MV04'25"v 524.56 feet alongihe wast line of Venture Subdivision to the POINT OF BRGINNMG.' • no above-described panel cenlams 60,00 aem, more a lass, • Snbjeot to sn}%existing'easemenfs or rights-of-way of tecoul or appment; Pago 2of2 ' E i E J b9•Slbl'C L.JS'N69'd0' `E tJJP.bd' _.. �... � d _ a.1 F,. 511 m+ta xe z saebblwn Legend Beunbo-y.ln -ua -..., p RphMof-s2p Wr M; . r' c(ka - soarw r#aa n i 7755 � c�a _ aos.,-s.nsr ria • Cpwr ueNo.n xN sWH.l�fm dn+ HvMi @Wna G 4 GSerd Bw1M qeN G P C 1 w ct trtt'Sa• Yb uf'fa•obY ) M f5 PAY'If• O 6Y IW 1 la lka TtlS Vnr Hswln 4 ILI bLb ' _ _ ____ __ __ A29'S8'Y'£ 66191• .. y„ Eek AoroHl 2 i om 50.00 ActHs t � ' i n j 1 ueasraew nbsm' ( $@ reun.e( 4Kn^I^p I y SG 6 � 9 5 4 - va rexx...tw�wi - ms=aCln zisisT'—"-sdrie^ab-c sc'Csi• --- - 9 MMME:V:::1lMllllNew Parcel 2 Exhibit PMjed.No. 607M70,70.00 bate, C71VUos A a r1 1 0 N 1 N O, Meridian Town. Center PCoaper Wm"o,aAw ft%v i-Wm'-dnC oLC -Imo b.r�+zaa:w.BbAo�on C401 Sheet No. IOft 11 �tf 1. General and Special Taxes for the year 2008, an accruing lien not due or payable until the fourth Monday in November 2008 when the bills are issued, the first half of which is not delinquent until after December 20, 2008. 2. General taxes which may be assessed and extended on any "subsequent" or 'occupancy" tax roll, which may escape assessment of the regular tax roll; which are a lien not yet due orpayable. 3. Liens. levies and assessments by Nampa -Meridian Irrigation District, 4. Right of way foe Stokeberry Lateral & South Lateral, also known as Finch Lateral. 5. Except mineral or watenrights, claims or title to mineral or water not owned by Grantor. 6. Rights, rights of way, reservations and exceptions in the patent recorded in Book 5 of patents, Page 18. 7. License Agreement upon'the terms, conditions and provisions contained therein; Dated: August 5, 1996 ' Parties: NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT & INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY ,Recorded; August 9,1996 Instrument No. 96066964 8. Right of access to and from the land. 9. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which would be disclosed by a correct ALTA/ACSM survey. 42UO.W0212527011 AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST STATE OF IDAHO ) 1 COUNTY OF ADA 1, 5AW (-A I'.022 W • C,4 Mdt h 'Blvd. G CM ��n r b4 (name) �GiA�ID (address) (city) (state) being first duly sworn upon, oath, depose and say: 1. That I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant my permission to: C eve Siddowav dwaU AVe-, Mekll� ,I kv (name) (address) to submit the accompanying application(s) pertaining to that property. 2. I agree to indemnify, defend and hold the City of Meridian and its employees harmless from any claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements contained herein or as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application. 3. I hereby grant permission to City of Meridian staff to enter the subject property for the purpose of site inspections related to processing said application(s). Dated this 01 _day of MAV A I , 20 1 D SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. I (Notary P,Jublic(fgf Idaho) Residing at: �� WA 6 My Cornmission Expires: 12-42--12— -T Record of Survey No.�Pft Plop ,VoundaryAdjusb¢ent&OnaTio, DMIbn SlWale In Butte 4, TctmsNp3 Nenh, Range l Each Boles Mer?an, Ada Cowry, Wako. 2009 • SCALE 1 =200' Z00 f00 O 200 Legend • BoundaryLine --------- - ExiExisting Parts[ Line -Naw Forest Line --------- -Boston Lina ------ -Center Linn --------- •W9hlro&way Line -- -- -- -- — - Adjacent Proparly Lina -------------------- -Easement Line -x—xx—x°--°x—x— -Fenm Lines IS' + -Section Comer, Found Bross Cap cw -Quarter-Sedi¢n Comer, Found Bases COP O - Found 112' Rebar - Found 618' Rebar D - intersection Point Not Set or Found ❑ -Found RR Spike ® -Fountl Brass Cap O - Set 112"x24m Reber, Will m Plastic Cap Marked "WRG PLS 11334" O - Set 608A30' Rebar, with Plastic Cap Marked °WRG PLS 11334' iv �, , a,,., n . „ o �"AB'99NJ° `ht Meridian Centercal, LLC CP&F 102030978 R D 'E S 1 G P4 I N C. 1173 E, Winding Creek Drive, Eagle, lD 83616 Tel, 208246.8300 Fax 208.246.8320 PLWNSme • Et1C>INEERS • IANOSOAP8 Afi0HRE0TS • SURVEYORS 0.74' i Reference Surveys I _ R03s443,773,1203, h646. %W,1694, i0W,1897,2173, 2365,3475,3047,6033, m I 6740,6027, 5937,02,6456,6630, 6600,7198,&7462: ALTA for Walter an! Eugene teener by Tuley dated 9x005 Sh003 Prellminary Gut Feast Erbibil ror Wells. M Sagas a Mails Tealey dated 12716M m 15.00 Reference Subdivisions A1NaaCondm,Vedwe, Clover Meatus 1-3, Chelsea Weat lA choose sques, A I of s I � --�- �— AsianLead,RodFuttterEstates ld,SNhesbeny l-2,RusadsBut Wispytaunt Matce, PecMard id,TreasureValley Busineaz Center, Pehlns-Dmxn.&(irol�enne hfl9s. � Reference Deeds W! a� Deeds 95035360, 823744, 023745, 701097066, 7 0103 70 6 0, c Z' ¢ l> M74,,95035387, 991217An Doet0033474. 12175 Qultgaim Oxds 7 010 970 6 5&101097067. Gift Dttd 107049405. �� -- Reference Other I y paho0epp armentofHiMyPlan&Profileir-SH 6Sh)esh SZO. 6.SIaMol IdahoTensan0eprmenwH 0394 Ipm, I l 8aeofpahaDepaMlofHighnysP]aa&Pmfi[OHHV3 )Bbee*6E Idaho Pont Plan& Prn0le Cloverdaletosal Grove 230 KV 5heeh456y5harp&SndOl. to �� FimtAmedmn TiooCommibnent NCS -29134&801 I —` - County Recorder's Certificate w SlaladIdehoD8�i 7i )y InsWment No, g I o I ss. Counlya(Me) �I o m) -z therebyeeNrylha(NIOInsWmenlxasfiledetihe requestofVtRGDuign, Ina at �1 •-- �`�Jninules pazt 2o'da�M., 01sL�"day of J \v 209 1 z7 I s Faali_0 pV1/Iv l� I v �N00°06'79°E D¢pu-•Otfido Recorder iv �, , a,,., n . „ o �"AB'99NJ° `ht Meridian Centercal, LLC CP&F 102030978 R D 'E S 1 G P4 I N C. 1173 E, Winding Creek Drive, Eagle, lD 83616 Tel, 208246.8300 Fax 208.246.8320 PLWNSme • Et1C>INEERS • IANOSOAP8 Afi0HRE0TS • SURVEYORS t I Planning Department DESIGN REVIEW Design Manual Compliance /�,-A- Sim F44AI.I✓in/61 s 4~r cp tgeona�7S� II I I site layout that influence development character... To promote the interconnectivity of the community and reduce the impacts that vehicle access points impose on roadways and the physical and visual character of developments. I See corresponding item in the Design Manual forfidl teat. 2 Insert cononents or explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-compliance. 3 Incorporating this guideline may help offset non-compliance with other guidelines. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org 1-25-2010) Y N N/A Design Guidelines' Comments2 Staff C-1.2.3.1. Limit direct vehicular access off major roadways, including highways, principal arterials... C-1.2.3.1.1. Coordinate and combine access points with adjacent sites and uses to reduce or eliminate... C-1.2.3.1.2. Provide site ingress/egress from secondary roadways for sites adjacent to major roadways. C-1.2.3.1.3. Where secondary roadways cannot be provided, coordinate and combine access points to... C-1.2.3.1.4. Multiple -site and large-scale developments should limit ingress/egress points and establish... C-1.2.3.1.5. Use shared access points, secondary roadways, or internal circulation to access corner sites. C-1.2.3.2. Provide pedestrian and vehicular connections that link adjacent uses and circulation... C-1.2.3.2.1. Where possible, coordinate and align ingress/egress points, cross access, and internal... C-1.2.3.2.2. Unrestricted access points and roadways used for site entry should align across primary... C-1.2.3.2.3.3 Multiple pedestrian routes should converge on public and open spaces, such as transit... C-1.2.3.3. Establish internal site circulation as an interconnected network of walkways, pathways... C-1.2.3.4. Plan for access and connectivity to future transit facilities, including, but not limited to... C-1.2.3.4.1. Coordinate with the appropriate agencies and organizations to ensure the successful... C 1.2.3.4.2.3 Provide adequate pedestrian connections from public spaces, building entries, and parking... Objectives: To ensure that site organization, including, but not limited to, the placement and orientation of buildings, structures, and public spaces, as well as the location and layout of service and parking areas, promotes an integrated built environment that establishes an appropriate development character. N N/A_ Design Guidelines' Comments Staff - C-1.3.2.1. Locate buildings to establish an appropriate development character that enhances the... C-1.3.2.1.1. Bring buildings up close to roadways to establish a street presence and orient primary... C-1.3.2.1.2. Limit the distance from buildings to roadways and the distance between buildings... C-1.3.2.13. Large-scale and multibuilding developments may place buildings away from... ' See corresponding item in the Design Manual for fill test. 2 Insert comments or explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-compliance. 3 Incorporating this guideline may help offset non-compliance with other guidelines. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org I Y N N/A Design Guidelines' Commente Staff C-1.3.2.1.4.3 Use buildings that incorporate articulated fapades and architectural elements to anchor site... C-1.3.2.2. Provide clearly defined building entries and connect them to roadways, pedestrian walkways... C-1.3.2.2.1. Primary building entries should face roadways, pedestrian environments, or adjacent... C-1.3.2.2.2. Large-scale buildings should provide entrances on at least two different building fagades... C-1.3.2.3. Strategically locate public spaces and site amenities, such as common open space, transit... C-1.3.2.3.1. Organize buildings around public space and site amenities to establish destinations that... C-1.3.2.3.2.3 Use building fapades, enhanced 'streetscapes, or other appropriate enhancements to... C-1.3.2.3.3. Orient public spaces and site amenities toward roadways adjacent to building entries... C-1.3.2.3.4.3 Spaces designed for courtyards, outdoor seating, dining areas, or other such spaces should... C-1.3.2.4. Locate parking toward the interior of the site and integrate parking areas to establish an attractive... C-1.3.2.4.1. Place parking areas away from site corners, primarily to the rear and/or side of buildings... C-1.3.2.4.2. Use a parking strategy to minimize the land area devoted to vehicular parking; include... C-1.3.2.4.3. Distribute parking into smaller areas around, between, and behind structures to shorten the... C-1.3.2.5. Where possible, coordinate the placement of public spaces, site amenities, parking areas, and/or... C-1.3.2.6. Locate site services, building utilities, and mechanical equipment to enhance the attractiveness... C-1.3.2.6.1. Place and orient service and loading areas, in equipment, and utilities away from... C-1.3.2.6.2. Where possible, place service and loading areas behind buildings and provide access from... C-1.3.2.6.3. Coordinate the placement of freestanding site services and mechanical equipment to eliminate... C-1.3.2.6.4. Place utility lines underground and away from planting zones whenever possible. I See corresponding item in the Design Manual far jtdl text. 2 Insert continents or explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-canpliance. 3 Incorporating this guideline tiny help offset non-compliance with other guidelines. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org ke To incorporate parking as an integrated element of the built environment and address issues that influence the physical and visual characteristics of parking areas, such as the appropriate location for parking, size of parking areas, paving materials, landscaping, and screening. Y N NIA Design Guidelines' Comments'; Staff.`: C-1.4.3.1. Parking areas should establish an appropriate circulation pattern for pedestrians and... C-1.4.3.1.1. Coordinate vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns to delineate pedestrian walkways... C-1.4.3.1.2. Provide pedestrian connections from internal circulation to public spaces and adjacent... C-1.4.3.2. Design surface parking as an integrated and attractive element of the built environment that... C-1.4.3.2.1. Break up parking areas into smaller, separated modules and arrange parking to minimize... C-1.4.3.2.2. Reduce the depth of parking areas and limit parking between building fagades and... C-1.4.3.2.3. The design and layout of internal site parking should avoid long, unbroken parking bays... C-1.4.3.2.4. Use trees, landscaping, hardscapes, and architectural elements to provide shade, create... ` C-1.4.3.2.5.3 Shade pedestrian walkways and parking, including stalls and drive aisles, with the appropriate... C-1.4.3.2.6.3 Screen parking with berms, landscaping, -walls, architectural elements, or a combination to... C-1.4.3.2.7. Distribute and integrate appropriately scaled lighting to provide safe and adequately... C-1.4.3.3. Where appropriate, incorporate and arrange on -street parking to produce traffic calming effects... C-1.4.3.3.1. Coordinate the use of on -street parking, including the design and location, with the... ' C-1.4.3.3.2.3 Internal roadways are encouraged to use on -street parking that is integrated with streetscapes... C-1.4.3.3.3 3 Where on -street parking is provided or '.where vehicles are circulation is directed in front of... Structured parking facilities are encouraged -and should be designed to coordinate vehicular... ® .110111 `Objective: To provide a variety of attractive, usable, and integrated public and open spaces that enhance development character, encourage pedestrian use, and contribute to community life and the positive experience of daily activities. Y IN I NIA ?Design Guidelines' Comments2.` Staff C-1.5.3. 1. Design public and open spaces as destinations within individual developments and... ' See corresponding item in the Design Manual for fill text. 2lnsert comments or explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-compliance. 3 hrcotporating this guideline may help offset non-compliance with other guidelines. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854. • Website: www.meridiancity.org i Y N N/A C-1.5.3.1.1. Provide appropriate types and sizes of `Comments2 Staff Comments' Staff public and open spaces, including development... .1. Use an organizational strategy for landscape i Y N N/A -Design GuidelinesI `Comments2 Staff Comments' Staff C-1.5.3.1.2. Clearly delineate the edges of public .1. Use an organizational strategy for landscape spaces. Use building facades, materials, architectural... s to promote aesthetic compositions that... C-1.5.3.1.3 3 Where appropriate, place public and open .1.1 ° Use formal planting arrangements, such spaces adjacent or in close proximity to transit... as regular and linear intervals and geometric patterns... C-1.5.3.1.4. Design public spaces to provide visual C-1.6.2.1.2 a Use informal planting arrangements, such interest that enhances development character and... as irregular intervals, random patterns, and... C-1.5.3.1.5. Where appropriate, use public and open spaces as transitions between land uses to promote... C-1.6.2.2. Integrate landscaping as appropriate to C-1.5.3.2. Incorporate pedestrian -oriented amenities establish a consistent appearance and aesthetic... that promote various active and passive uses within... C-1.6.2.2.1. Use appropriate classes of trees for urban C-1.5.3.2.1, Use decorative pavers or other materials environments and streetscapes. Consider height and... suitable for hardscapes that endure well and add... C-1.5.3.2.2. Incorporate plantings, trees, and other plant materials to add vertical texture and variety to public... C-1.5.3.2.3. Provide adequate seating that reflects the nature of the intended activities. Use fixed seating... C-1.5.3.2.4:3 Introduce public art as an integral part of the public realm. As appropriate, incorporate... C-1.5.3.2.5.3 Include decorative details and elements, such as banners, flags, signs, and planters, which... C-1.5.3.2.6. Where appropriate, provide pedestrian - scaled light fixtures that provide adequate lighting... C-1.5.3.3. Public and open spaces should maintain pedestrian and user safety and provide secure... f6` dh4eaping ; active and purposeful use of plants and other landscape materials that enhance development To enMIUse charapublic and open space, parking, required buffers, and pedestrian environments. NGuidelinesi Comments' Staff .1. Use an organizational strategy for landscape s to promote aesthetic compositions that... .1.1 ° Use formal planting arrangements, such as regular and linear intervals and geometric patterns... C-1.6.2.1.2 a Use informal planting arrangements, such as irregular intervals, random patterns, and... C-1.6.2.2. Integrate landscaping as appropriate to establish a consistent appearance and aesthetic... C-1.6.2.2.1. Use appropriate classes of trees for urban environments and streetscapes. Consider height and... I See corresponding item in the Design Manual for fill text. 2 Insert conwnents or explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-compliance. 3 Incorporating this guideline may help offset non-complimue with other guidelines. 4 Appropriately use fonnal and/or informal planting arrmngentents to meet the guideline. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 9 Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 o Website: www.meridiancity.org Y N N/A C-1.6.2.2.2.' Landscaping should encourage the comments2 Staff N/A Design Guidelines' Comments' j appropriate and attractive use of xeric, drought... Y N N/A Design Guidelines) comments2 Staff N/A Design Guidelines' Comments' j C-1.6.2.2.3. Incorporate various plants and non - C-2.1.3.1. Building designs should appropriately vegetative materials that provide groundcover and... address building scale, mass, and form, and the use... C-1.6.2.2.4.' Use planters and planting arrangements C-2.1.3.2. Use fundamental design principles, that feature seasonal plants, flowers, and ornamental... including, but not limited to, composition, order... C-1.6.2.3' Where appropriate or advantageous to C-2.1.3.3. Design building facades that express promote pedestrian activity, integrate streetscape... �C architectural character and incorporate the use of... C-1.6.2.4. Where possible, development should C-2.1.3.3.1. Design all appropriate sides of buildings, coordinate landscaping with adjacent properties to... ' See corresponding item in the Design Manual forfull text. 2 Insert comments or explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-compliance. ' Incorporating this guideline may help offset non-compliance with other guidelines. 5 Incorporating vertically integrated uses may help offset non-compliance with other guidelines. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org Objective: To encourage visually aesthetic building designs that promote quality architectural character and establish built environments that are compatible with existing, planned, and/or anticipated adjacent land uses. Y N N/A Design Guidelines' Comments' j Staff C-2.1.3.1. Building designs should appropriately address building scale, mass, and form, and the use... C-2.1.3.2. Use fundamental design principles, including, but not limited to, composition, order... C-2.1.3.3. Design building facades that express �C architectural character and incorporate the use of... C-2.1.3.3.1. Design all appropriate sides of buildings, including fagades that face public roadways, public... C-2.1.3.4. Building design should enhance public and opens spaces, articulate aesthetic character, and... C-2.1.3.4.1. Design buildings to enhance the attractiveness and appeal of developments, define... C-2.1.3.4.2. Where appropriate, incorporate human and �t pedestrian scale as integral components of the... C-2.1.3.5. Use building design and architecture to promote mixed-use and denser developments as... C-2.1.3.5.1 S Building designs are encouraged to use vertically integrated structures and/or horizontal... ' See corresponding item in the Design Manual forfull text. 2 Insert comments or explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-compliance. ' Incorporating this guideline may help offset non-compliance with other guidelines. 5 Incorporating vertically integrated uses may help offset non-compliance with other guidelines. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org To encourage building designs that appropriately use architectural and human scale to establish compatible physical and visual relationships withadjacent and surrounding developments and reinforce a cohesive architectural character. Y N N/A Design Guidelines' Comments' Staff Staff C-2.2.2.1. Proposed developments should use _ C-2.3.2.1. Articulate building forms, including, but not X >t proportion and scale to design buildings compatible... limited to, massing, walls, and roofs, with... C-2.2.2.1.1. Infill, greenfield, and redevelopment C-2.3.2.1.1. Building fayades that face roadways, }C X proposals should coordinate the placement... public spaces, and pedestrian environments should... C-2.2.2.1.2. Large-scale and multibuilding C-2.3.2.1.2. Design parking structures as integrated X developments are encouraged to produce innovative... buildings that are compatible with surrounding uses... C-2.2.2.1.3. Where possible, group or incorporate C-2.3.2.1.3. Parking structures should incorporate X X smaller uses along fapades that introduce modulation... modulations, architectural elements, details... C-2.2.2.2. Design and configure buildings to reduce C-2.3.2.2. Incorporate visual and physical distinctions overwhelming and disproportioned architectural... in the building design that enhance building forms... C-2.2.2.2.1. Development should consider the scale of k surrounding buildings, including relationships to... C-2.2.2.2.2. Use variation in building form and Y, proximity to other buildings, including, but not... C-2.2.2.2.3. Where appropriate, establish a hierarchy of %K building scales that transition from intense to less... C-2.2.2.2.4. Building scales along roadways and X adjacent to or near urban areas of the community are... C-2.2.2.3. Incorporate human scale on appropriate building fapades to support an aesthetic architectural... C-2.2.2.3.1. Use human scale to emphasize fenestration patterns, architectural elements, proportion... C-2.2.2.3.2. Human scale is required at the ground or - i< street level at building entries, along roadways, and... To enhance the visual interest of building designs and promote quality architectural character. Y N N/A Design Guidelines) Comments2 Staff _ C-2.3.2.1. Articulate building forms, including, but not >t limited to, massing, walls, and roofs, with... C-2.3.2.1.1. Building fayades that face roadways, }C public spaces, and pedestrian environments should... C-2.3.2.1.2. Design parking structures as integrated X buildings that are compatible with surrounding uses... C-2.3.2.1.3. Parking structures should incorporate X modulations, architectural elements, details... C-2.3.2.2. Incorporate visual and physical distinctions in the building design that enhance building forms... See corresponding )tent in the Design Manual for full text. 2 Insert comments or explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-compliance. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org vu�wuvc. To integrate architectural elements and details as components of cohesive building designs that enhance the visual interest of building fagades, support activity at and/or near ground level, and provide human and pedestrian scale. C-2.3.2.2.1. Use divisions, fenestration, architectural N N/A K CommentsZ Staff elements, details, accent materials, and human scale... C-2.4.2.1. Use architectural elements and detailing, C-2.3.2.2.2. Where building designs incorporate including, but not limited to, fenestration pattern... multiple stories, or equivalent building heights... Yi N N/A Design Guidelines' "Comments2 Staff elements using proportions, divisions, detailing... C-2.3.2.2.3. Use horizontal and vertical divisions in C-2.4.2.1.2. Provide architectural elements and wall planes to organize fenestration as integrated... detailing that emphasize human scale throughout the... C-2.3.2.2.4. Design lower stories to visually anchor k buildings to the ground or street and appropriately... - overhangs or other similar features, such as canopies... C-2.3.2.2.5. Design the uppermost story or fagade wall C-2.4.2.1.4.3 Integrate strategically located elements as k planes to complete the building design. Use articulation... focal points in building designs. Focal elements... C-2.3.2.2.6. Building designs within designated areas of >( the Ten Mile Specific Area Plan are encouraged to use... C-2.3.2.3. Building designs should establish visual x connections that relate internal spaces at ground- or... y C-2.3.2.3.1. Use architectural elements, such as doors and windows, details, and materials to articulate building... C-2.3.2.3.2. Fagades at ground level should average 40 /W t percent transparency along roadways and adjacent to... C-2.3.2.4. Building designs should provide proportionally x taller ground -level fagades to accommodate various... C-2.3.2.5. Building roof types, forms, and elements f; should provide variation and interest to building... C-2.3.2.5.1. Building designs should incorporate �C appropriate roof forms with primary and secondary... C-2.3.2.5.2. Where appropriate, modulate and/or articulate roof types, both flat and sloped, with roof... vu�wuvc. To integrate architectural elements and details as components of cohesive building designs that enhance the visual interest of building fagades, support activity at and/or near ground level, and provide human and pedestrian scale. Y N N/A Design Guidelines' CommentsZ Staff C-2.4.2.1. Use architectural elements and detailing, including, but not limited to, fenestration pattern... C-2.4.2.1.1. Design and articulate architectural elements using proportions, divisions, detailing... C-2.4.2.1.2. Provide architectural elements and detailing that emphasize human scale throughout the... C-2.4.2.1.3.' Where appropriate, provide building X overhangs or other similar features, such as canopies... C-2.4.2.1.4.3 Integrate strategically located elements as focal points in building designs. Focal elements... ' See corresponding item in the Design Manual for fill text. 2 Insert continents or explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-compliance. 3 Incorporating this guideline may help offsetnon-emrrpliance with other guidelines. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 6 Website: www.meridiancity.org C-2.4.2.2.. Building designs should not create blank wall )C segments along roadways or adjacent to public space... C-2.4.2.3. Organize and locate building service X equipment, including, but not limited to, mechanical... Y N N/A Design Guidelines' Comments ` Staff Comments2, Staff C-2.4.2.3.1. Use integrated architectural elements to C-2.5.2.1. Buildings with facades that face multiple X }C provide adequate screening and appropriately... roadways and/or public spaces should use consistent... C-2.4.2.3.2. Screen service equipment at ground level C-2.5.2.2. Use complementary material combinations >1 from pedestrian and vehicular view to a minimum... that contribute to a cohesive building design... k C-2.4.2.3.3. Screen service and building equipment that C-2.5.2.2.1. Select combinations that emphasize a X is attached or on top of structures from public view... finished composition and enhance human scale for... k C-2.4.2.3.4. Use screening techniques, architectural C-2.5.2.2.2. Concrete masonry that provides texture, X elements, and materials that are consistent with the... interest, and detail may be appropriate for building... unjective: To encourage the use of quality materials that promote aesthetic building designs and appropriate contributions to the development of a timeless community character. Y N N/A Design Guidelinest Comments2, Staff C-2.5.2.1. Buildings with facades that face multiple }C roadways and/or public spaces should use consistent... C-2.5.2.2. Use complementary material combinations that contribute to a cohesive building design... C-2.5.2.2.1. Select combinations that emphasize a X finished composition and enhance human scale for... C-2.5.2.2.2. Concrete masonry that provides texture, X interest, and detail may be appropriate for building... C-2.5.2.2.3. Use well -detailed, proportioned, and )C' durable materials that will weather and age gracefully... C-2.5.2.2.4. Create interest and variety in fagade design to establish attractive architectural character and... C-2.5.2.2.5. Provide pattern, texture, and detail in the 1>11 building design and distinguish field materials from... C-2.5.2.3. Where materials transition or terminate, Ix provide detailing to express the natural appearance... C-2.5.2.4. Use colors that complement the use of building materials and support innovative and good... C-2.5.2.4.1. The use of subtle, neutral, and natural >c tones for field materials should complement accent... C-2.5.2.4.2. The use of intensely bright and fluorescent '( colors, as well as the widespread use of saturated... C-2.5.2.4.3. Materials or colors with high reflectance, X such as metal or reflective glazing, should be... 2.6 Signs & Li&iing I See corresponding item in the Design Manual for full text. 2 Insert comments or explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-compliance. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org Objective: To encourage the use of signs and architectural lighting as integrated elements of building and site designs that contribute to the atmosphere of quality, aesthetic built environments. Y N N/A Design Guidelines Comments2 Staff k N/A Design Guidelines' C-2.6.3.1. Where appropriate, use lighting on building G 5lro" C-3.1.3.1. Orient industrial developments, including exteriors to promote safe pedestrian environments... .y k x buildings, structures, and site elements, such as work... C-2.6.3.1.1. Coordinate lighting fixture spacing and C-3.1.3.2. Provide an appropriate architectural design height along streetscapes and roadways to avoid... k' for buildings and structures that are adjacent to... C-2.6.3.1.2.3 The use of architectural lighting is C-3.1.3.3. Use the placement and orientation of the encouraged to be energy-efficient and easily... building or structure to screen industrial activity... C-2.6.3.1.3. Lighting fixtures used on building 9f 0, vfOexd ,l ®` 50/'/P C-3.1.3.4. Maintain the required buffers adjacent to exteriors should be integrated with building design... CAA Al Elm - 0 41 Ili kC-2.6.3.2. Signs should be integrated with architectural elements and complement building designs and... C-2.6.3.2.1. Provide signs to identify individual storefronts, buildings, and uses along roadways... C-2.6.3.2.2.3 Use corporate and business logos to k' identify developments and businesses along... C-2.6.3.2.3. Use appropriately scaled signs that incorporate logos, minimize or eliminate the use of... xWhere buildings are brought up close to roadways, pedestrian environments, and public... TX C-2.6.3.2.5.3 Decorative flags and banners should promote the identity of place and enhance the... Emomami 1111i Objective: To promote the appropriate use of site layout, separation techniques, and architectural design guidelines to mitigate the adverse impacts that industrial uses impose on adjacent commercial, residential, and other non- industrial uses. Y N N/A Design Guidelines' Comments Staff C-3.1.3.1. Orient industrial developments, including /Y/47N7b�v4AII 4,vl k buildings, structures, and site elements, such as work... /5 to C-3.1.3.2. Provide an appropriate architectural design /R�-B•'ud�• k' for buildings and structures that are adjacent to... C-3.1.3.3. Use the placement and orientation of the building or structure to screen industrial activity... C-3.1.3.4. Maintain the required buffers adjacent to i non-residential uses as indicated in the UDC... I See corresponding item in the Design Manua[ for fidl text. 2 Insert comments or explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-compliance. 3 Incorporating this guideline may help offset non-compliance with other guidelines. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 0 Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org 1W I. t Objective: ` To accommodate the adaptive reuse of the existing residence to a commercial use, while maintaining compatibility with the use(s) on adjoining properties. To ensure that such residential to commercial conversions are compatible with the existing character of the original residential use, while recognizing the need to modify the structure to meet commercial building code requirements. Y N N/A Design Guidelinest Comments -. Staff C-3.2.3.1. Developments that propose the conversion of residential to commercial within Old Town should... C-3.2.3.2. Residential to commercial conversions should use the guidelines from Section C. Design... C-3.2.3.3. Additions, restorations, and repairs should Xuse similar building forms, materials, and details... C-3.2.3.4. Where there are site constraints that prevent from a conversion complying with the site character... I See corresponding item in the Design Manual forfidl text. 8 Insert contents or explanations relevant to the projects compliance or non-compliance. 33 E. Broadway Ave. • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 1 Website: www,meridimeity.org E IDIAN�-- Planning Department DESIGN REVIEW ® Application Checklist Project name (U�I,�JIAS fA i�k&W MPJMOv 91 ?ala% TconcurrentFile#: Apphcanttagent C-yY.AAt s daCbV(m, mp t4aiLWl Rides e t1P!` All applications are required to contain one copy of the following: Applicant ption Description Staff (�) (�) Completed and signed Administrative Review Application (If also submitting a concurrent applicatioit for Conditional Use Permit, design review will V/ be processed along with that application. Therefore, anAdmvush-aul,e Review application is not necessary in this case; just check the Design Review box on Commission & Council Review Application and submit the information below.) - Completed Design Manual Compliance Checklists (B. Urban Design Guidelines; C. Urban/Suburban Design Guidelines; D. Suburban. Design Guidelines; E. Residential Design Guidelines) as applicable. Provide in a narrative letter, how the proposal addresses guidelines contained in the Meridian Design Manual and UDC 11-3A-19: 1. Architectural Character: a. Facades. b. Primary public entu ce(s). e. Roof lines. r d. Pattern variations. tf/J e. Fenestration E Mechanical equipment: All ground -level and rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened to the height of the unit as viewed from the property Inc. 2. Color and materials. Please provide color chips or exhibits of proposed colors. 3. Site Plan and Building Layout a. Building location b. Parking areas. c. Access d. Street layout and/or internal circulation. e. Pedestrian walkways and facilities. A complete set of scaled plans including building elevations, with building materials, colors / and textures specified and site plans. G/ Reductions of the elevations (8 W' x 11") Fee All regnests for design reviev approval Horst meet the procedures set forth in UDC 1I-5 and the criteria set forth in the "Meridian Design Manual", as applicable. APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BEACCEPTED UNLESSALLAPPLICABLE ITEMS ON THE CHECKLISTARE SUBMITTED. 33 B. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.merldiancity.org (Ren 1214108) r Planning Department CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE Application Checklist All annlications are required to contain one copy of the following unless otherwise noted: Applicant Description Staff (,f) (J) Completed & signed Administrative Review Application Narrative fully describing the proposed use of the property, including the following: / V ➢ Information on any previous approvals or requirements for the requested use (i.e.,applicable conditions ofapproval or Development Agreement) ✓� Recorded warranty deed for the subject property Affidavit of Legal Interest signed & notarized by the property owner (If or is a corporation, .1 submit a co of the Articles of Incorporation or other evidence to show that the arson si nin is an amhodwd a enc) Scaled vicitut ma showing the location of the subject property Fire Marshall approval for access and turn around (stamped, full size site plan) Sanitary Service Company approval for trash enclosure & access drive (stamped, full size site an) Civil Site/Dimension Plan —1 full size cop (folded to 8'/2" x 11" size) A photometric test report for any light fixture(s) with a maximum output of 1,800 lumens or more (see UDC 11-3A-11) Copy of the recorded plat the property lies with n (8 h" x 11") c py r1 Address verification letter from Public Works (898-5500) Site Plan -4 copies (folded to 8 r/z" x 11" size) I /' The followin items must be shown on the site plan: ✓ • Date, scale, north arrow, and project name (state not less than t"=50') ✓ • Names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the developer and the person and/or firm preparing the plan • Parking stalls and drive aisles • Trash enclosure(s) location • Detail of trash enclosure (must be screened on 3 sides) • Location and specifications for underground irrigation (pressurized irrigation can only be waived iF ou rove no water rights exist to subject property) ORA P WUL ticET • Sidewalks or pathways (proposed and existing) • Location of Rroposed building on lot (include dimensions to property lines) • Fencing (proposed and existing) • Calculations table including the following: )� Number of parking stalls required & provided (specify handicap & compact stalls) J ➢ Building size (sq. fl.) ➢ Lot size (sq. n.) ➢ Setbacks ➢ Zoning district • Reduction of the site plan (8 %2" x 11") t Landscape plan— 3 copies (folded to 81/2!'X 11" size) Plan nwst have a scale no sin I )- dmn 1 " = 50' (I " = 20' is preferred) and be on a standard " I"63p drawing street, not to exceed 36" s 48" (24" x36" is preferred). A plat rvhicli cannot be drawn in its entirety on a single sheet i ntst be drawn with appropriate match lines on nno or nrm'e sheets. The following items must be included on the landscape plan: e Date, scale, north arrow, and project name 33 E, Broadway Avenue, Nude Zia • rvrenmau, mm,v Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www.meridiancity.org ACHD Acceptance: Applicant shall be responsible for meeting the requirements ofACHD as they pertain to this application. All innpactfees, if any, shall be paid prior to tlne issuance of a building permit Ifany changes must be trade to fire site plat to accommodate the ACHD requirements, a new site plan shall be submitted to the City of Meridian Planing &7o8inrg Department far appiorgl piim'to the issuance ofa building pennit Your building penult will not be issued mnfil ACHD las approved your plans and all associated fees have been paid THIS APPLICATION SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE UNTIL STAFF HAS RECEIVED ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION. 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www,meridiancity.org (Ren 4103109) • Names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the developer and the person and/or firm preparing the plan • Stamp/signature of a landscape architect, landscape designer, or qualified nurseryman preparing the plan OtA FINA t4 • Existing natural features such as canals, creeks, drains, ponds, wetlands, floodplains, high groundwater areas, and rock outcroppings • Location, size, and species of all existing trees on site with trunks 4 inches or greater in diameter, measured 6 inches above the ground. Indicate whether the tree will be retained or removed tux4e pW (o exr NSA • A statement of how existing healthy trees proposed to be retained will be rotected from damage during construction • Existing structures, planting areas, light poles, power poles, walls, fences, berms, WIN parking and Ioading areas, vehicular drives, trash areas, sidewalks, pathways, Matin stormwater detention areas, signs, street furniture, and other man-made elements • Existing and proposed contours for all areas steeper than 20% slope. Berms shall t/ be shown with one -foot contours t/ • Sight Triangles as defined in 11-3A-5 of this ordinance eata S i rE 4Ar4 • Location and labels for all proposed plants, including trees, shrubs, and groundcovers (trees must not be planted in City water or sower easements). Scale shown for plant materials shall reflect approximate mature size • A plant list that shows the plant symbol, quantity, botanical name, common name, minimum planting size and container, tree class (I, 11, or III), and comments (for spacing, staking, and installation as appropriate) • Planting and installation details as necessary to ensure conformance with all required standards • Design drawing(s) of all fencing proposed for screening purposes • Calculations of project components to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this ordinance, including: ➢ Number of street trees and lineal feet of street frontage D Width of street buffers (exclusive of right-of-way) ➢ Width of parking lot perimeter landscape strip ➢ Buffer width between different land uses (if applicable) ➢ Number of parking stalls and percent of parking area with internal landscaping ➢ Total number of trees and tree species mix ➢ Mitigation for removal of existing trees, including number of caliper inches being removed -Taj) Reduction of the landscape plan (8 tW' x 11") t Building elevations showing construction materials — 3 copies (folded to 8 %x" x li" size) Reduction of the elevations (8 W' x 11") If applying for approval of a public school, provide additional information as required by - N J� the Public School Facility supplemental checklist per §67-6519 Fee (If this project had prior approval on a site plan, reduced fees may apply) ACHD Acceptance: Applicant shall be responsible for meeting the requirements ofACHD as they pertain to this application. All innpactfees, if any, shall be paid prior to tlne issuance of a building permit Ifany changes must be trade to fire site plat to accommodate the ACHD requirements, a new site plan shall be submitted to the City of Meridian Planing &7o8inrg Department far appiorgl piim'to the issuance ofa building pennit Your building penult will not be issued mnfil ACHD las approved your plans and all associated fees have been paid THIS APPLICATION SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE UNTIL STAFF HAS RECEIVED ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION. 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6854 • Website: www,meridiancity.org (Ren 4103109) i I i (I A� YY LQQQ6 J ( I III � I i is ss Fw / 3e Ir � I S r ( l I 1 I 0 0 ��§gy�� s_yg®egg MINI N •g i �� C EE4 � A 2' Jig� r gggA 3� 5 D g� y A $�n £k X59 2 wpp� vb A D a 0 0 m A N S m E 0 ��§gy�� s_yg®egg MINI N •g i �� C EE4 � A 2' Jig� r gggA 3� 5 D g� y 0 m A N S m E �r 0 O O � m II " 14 z N Jig� r gggA 3� 5 D g� y A $�n £k X59 2 �r �w� 0 O z N Jig� r 5 A £k X59 2 wpp� vb A D �w� 3 O z N n man mm®V+ m O M T CL N PO> ■ Z CL z O�I i Z;o Z m '"''' Y Z Yy a 9-n F4k4kF i W N lit tlaf Ay 1 ��[ 4C p y 3 S A Z � ypgA AN otl it g pyop A 9 � Z ' r O N C .V m � vomro a 18 12 i i Q a4 18 12 n I V jiI 6 F- J U a LL U Z U n w a z c� a s ro f- 0 g¢ W 1 <j W Ago Fq I' 3 II IN ,. Fa°l �Z � s 41s wig 'l II yc E a x. 5�5 $ €s�8 �Pua Bae§ �s% __ ,LI � i GG ❑ 9 0 W N Z op W3W i oil x. � I 0 W N Z op W3W i I L r hol 9 i M, 6 II' II: gig i II Ili 17-7 T yam.. oA II' =v y2 ^At RF 2 PP / v = ,, Fn 2ND 0 1 6¢ D �—r m do r o Z , y v d __._ . �.£� ,-6� �:zs �,rd y� et I3'6 II % � ° 2 II II 1� —,._ _ — — � —— - $ L i>- _�------ ^ 9_ � W (I I i� �. �� $� �� IE II I II � �� -� ?_ '' II I II ov � --�1_ !b �� s _ _ — _._ ____ � A '6� Eg" `g� 9g i I 'i � �� B �;;, � � �� i �', � � f �� -�r F�{ � ��F ' n� � / ii / N � �,rn 'r Lr "< � :� "�� 44 pp � ��' �n :y w oz q� m A A Y 1 :]I] In i O — $$ m S v ,,, , �',.: 1 m ".F z D A ' Joh rtsorrArch i teats A PROPESSIONAI OORP00ATION August 17, 2010 Sonya Watters City of Meridian Planning and Zoning 33 E. Broadway Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 RE: Design Review Modifications Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park — Park Structures (CZC-10-018 / DES -10-012) Meridian, Idaho Sonya: Please find attached the modified designs for the various park structures at the Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park. Because of budgetary constraints, we have redesigned the signature shelter as well as made subtle adjustments to the other structures as well. The following are direct responses to your e-mailed comments, dated August 12, 2010: • Sheet A2.42 (CZC Sheet A7): Drawings have been updated. • Sheet A4.21 (CZC Sheet A3) / Sheet A4.41 (CZC Sheet A4): Drawings have been updated. • Sheets A5.32, A5.41, and A5.43 (CZC Sheets Al2 and A13): We are proposing an architectural composition roof shingle for the primary roof over the maintenance, while using a standing seam roofing system over the cupolas and wash rack (accessory) structure. Drawings have been updated. If Planning and Zoning does not feel this combination of roof types is appropriate, an architectural composition shingle roofing system will be used for all roofing conditions. • Sheet A3.41 (CZC Sheet A2): Drawings have been updated. • CZC Sheet LS4: Per my e-mail, the wash rack structure was added to the'north of the maintenance building since our original CZC application. This structure is now located on the building plan check / permit set by Parametrix. • Sheet A2.51 and A2.52: There are two individual restroom prototype plans, which make up a total of three structures throughout the Park and an independent concessions (w/ pump room) structure, which is consistent with the CZC set. F r -,the purposes of the building set, these three floor plans are combined on the same shegt�l,lvhile subsequent plans (ceiling, roof, etc.) are on the same sheets as well. There is no structure that houses both restroom and concessions... just a grouping of structures within the drawing set. Thank you again for your review and consideration of this Certificate of Zoning Compliance for the Kleiner Park structures. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions and/or comments regarding this resubmittal. ASinrten AIA, PrincipalJOHNSCHITECTS, PC 440 E Corporate Drive, Suite 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642 , (200) 698 9033 r (208) 846 9475 w www.johnsnnarcl7iteds.cnrn page-) R�1 Sonya Watters From: Sonya Watters Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 11:50 AM To: 'Walt Lindgren' Cc: Brent Bjornson; Peter Friedman Subject: Kleiner Park - Park Structures CZC-10-018 Hi Walt, I've reviewed the plans you submitted to the Building Department for consistency with the plans approved with the CZC and found the following discrepancies: Sheet A2.42 (CZC Sheet A7) - The side elevation (figure 4) of the concession building is not consistent w/the plan approved w/the CZC Sheet A4.21 (CZC Sheet A3); Floor Plan & Sheet A4.41 (CZC Sheet A4) Elevations - The side elevation & floor plan of the picnic shelter is not consistent w/the plan approved w/the CZC Sheet A5.32, A5.41 & A5.42 (CZC Sheets Al2 & At 3) - Roof material is not consistent w/approved plan (the approved plan shows a metal roof for both structures; the plan submitted to the Building Dept. shows a shingle roof for the maintenance building & a metal roof for the accessory structure - The roof materials should be the same for both structures. q2 l9 Pi"„ Sheet A3.41 (CZC Sheet A2) - The material of the entry feature does not appear to be consistent w/the approved plan (decorative metal panel) CZC Sheet LS4 - The plan does not depict the location of the 16'x 22' accessory structure (not sure if the plan s bmitted to the Building Dept. did... please verify) ➢ Sheet A A2. rer`ooms & concessions) -This appears to be a combination restroom/concession bui ing"Tdiif n"ot approve this plan with the CZC and the site plan does not reflect this building. This building will require CZC & design review approval & should be removed from the plans submitted to the Building Dept. Correct me if %m wrong... If the plans submitted to the Building Department for permits are correct, please submit (3) revised copies of each of the above noted plans for the CZC. If the plans submitted to the Building Dept. are not correct, please submit 2 revised copies of the plans. Let me know if you have any questions. P.S. The plans for the Senior Center have been approved by the Planning Department. Thanks, sowuUq wntters Associate City Planner City of Meridian - Planning Department 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 210 Meridian, Idaho 83642 208.884.5533 ph. / 208.888.6854 fax 8/11/2010