The URL can be used to link to this page

Honor Park Subdivision No. 3 PP WILLIAM G. BF_RG, JR., Clty Clerk JANICE L. GASS, Clty Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., Clty Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Flre Chlef W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Pnblic Worl;s/Building Departtne~ (208) 887-22[I Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 ROBERT D. CORRIE Mayor COUNCIL MEMBERS WALT W. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M. ROUNTREE GLENN R. BENTLEY P & Z COMMISSION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman TIM HEPPER JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND MALCOLM MACCOY TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDyAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~& Zoning Commission, please submit your corr>Iments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: April 2 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/18/96 HEARING DATE:__~ Q RE UEST: Prelimina Plat for Honor P n Q ark No. 3 ubd~risio BY: William Hon LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: South of Franklin Road. West of Stratford Drive JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z _GREG OSLUND, P/Z _TIM HEPPER, P/Z BOB CORRIE, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, CIC CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C GLENN BENTLEY, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FNAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: . ,. ED ~UB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN e r,nr ~p1GINEER//`/G BRIGGS INC. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE HONOR PARK SUBDIVISION NO. 3 1. Stratford Drive is constructed with a 41 foot section with curb, gutter and 5 foot sidewalks on the west side. The developer will be required to dedicate additional right-of-way on Franklin Road and construct 5 foot sidewalks along the south side. The two proposed internal streets are private and will be constructed with a 24 foot section. The developer will meet all requirements of Ada County Highway District. 2. The parcel is zoned CG (General Commercial). This subdivision plat will conform to the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 3. Existing central sewer and water facilities will be extended to service the subject property. 4. The proposed lots meet all applicable dimensional standards set forth in the Meridian City Ordinance. 5. Existing sewer easements are shown on the preliminary plat. Any additional easements requested by the City of Meridian or utility companies will be provided. 6. No new public streets are proposed. 951004 950611 1111 S. Orchard, Suite 600 • Boise, Idaho 83705 • (208) 344-9700 Fax# (208) 345-2950 • REaU£ST FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PRELIMINARY PLAT AHD/OR FINAL PLAT PLANNING ANU ZONING COMMISSION TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSIOPt: A request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerks possession na later than tt,ree days following the -regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commissiari will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month the request was made. After a proposal er~ter~s the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings pr~avided the necessary procedures and documentation are received bef ore 5:00 P. M., Thursday f ollawing the Planning and Zoning Commission action. GENERAL INFURMATIC~N 1. Name of Annexation and Subdivision, HONOR PARK NO. 3 2. General Location, NW 1/4 SECTION 18, T 3N, R 1E 3. Owners of record, ~~~ A• HON, ~~~ E. NORRIS & ROLAND L. HON Address, 3010 W. STATE ST., BOISE, IDZip 83703Telephone 343-7514 4. Applicant, ~j'L'~ `•°'• HON Address, 3010 W. STATE ST., BOISE, ID 8370; 5. Engineer, STAN McHUTCHISON Firm ~~ EDTGINEE~22NG, INC. Address 1111 S. ORC~iARD, STE 600, Fp 83705 Telephone 344-9700 6. Name and address to receive Gity billings: Name WILLIAM A. HON 83703 Address 3010 W. STATE ST., BOIS~elephone 343-7514 PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres 21.64 2. ~ Number of 1 ots 19 BUILDABLE & 2 CONIlKON 3. Lots per acre 1.02 4. Density per acre •878 5. Zoning Classificationts) ~ • • 6. If the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridian City Limits but within the jurisdictional mile. what is the existing zoning classification NO 7. Does the plat border a potential green belt NO £i. Have recreational easements been provided for ~ 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City NO Explain 10. Are there proposed dedications of common areas? NO Explain For future parks? Explain 11. What school (s ) service the area MF'RmIAN , do you propose any agreements for future school sites NO , Explain 12. Other proposed amenities to the City CENTRAL Water Supply HYDRANTS Fire Department Explain CE<VTRP,L SEWER ls. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial or combination ) RCIAI' 1~. Type of Dwelling(s) Single Family, Duplexes. Multiplexes, other N/A 15. Proposed Development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot (s) . 43, 560 OR 1 ACRE b. Minimum square footage of structure (s ) N/A c. Are garages provides for, N/A square footage d. Are other coverings provided for N/A e. Landscaping has been prov~ir/d~~e~~~~d~~pp/f~~+To77rT~ TTNO . L+7~~D7e~s~cy}ri~b~~e~~+p Tn mrm rllfil[! Tnz+ TLR7L?Tf1DLR1 ~~ l tA`JL'3L'LL\l.' ^" USFS• EACH LIJl VYY17J.~-~ WILL LANDSCAPE, AND WILL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE LANDSCAPING RDQUIREI~NTS. Other _ (2) • • f. Trees will be provided for YES Trees will be maintained BY ~~ I~OT ~Nm g. Sprinkler systems are provided for ~~ THE DOTS ARE DEVELPID. h. Are there multiple units N/A Type remarks i. Are there special set back requirements NO . Explain j. Has off street parking been provided for YES ,Explain EACH CONII~RCIAL BUILDING WILL HAVE PARKING IATS. k. Value range of property N/A 1. Type of financing for development N/A ORIGINAL COVIIQANTS ON FILE AT m. Protective covenants were submitted , Date P~IDIAN 16. Does the proposal land lack other property NO Does it create Enclaves NO STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Streets. curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be canstructed to standards as •required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinan ce. Dimensions will De determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. ~~. Proposed use is in confar•mance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Pl an. 3. Develapment will connect to City services. 4. Development will camply witri City O-r•dinances. 5. Preliminary Plat will include all appropriate easements. 6. Street names mus t not co•riflict wi tY, City grid system. i3) ---~. ~~ ~~A~N ~ AS e ,~ 5 T ~ MAR ~ ~ ,~v. ,e - I ~ i. ~` _ --- --- 8 ? 22 23 24 16 - ~-TT ~+ i i N ,f ~ _ _ _ S__ _-~__ .- E 1DlAN 11_1 ~ ` - ~° ~ N 6 21 20 19 hST. h 15 14 13 i2 M- ~ I _ ,~ T --------- 5 E. KING ST. . e ~ "~ q © 14 ,o 9 Q~ 13 12 Il 10 9 8 ~7 6 5 -~ ,')ice 3 W 15 _~ r. ' f ---- c 2 c 19 O 20 23 2 ---, U ~ t ~: 5 , .. 16. 17 .. i ~ r ~1 ~ ~ i 3 .._._ 'i a.` ' . _ ..._ i s. r- `".. _. _ - - -~Ff~AfdIELAB - - - - ~•~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~is _-__ - - ~:- ' ,o ~ 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 i' 6 ,C J ,n i J[° '~ i .~ 'v. ~ I y ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ( ~ ' 20 SCE o ! \` c Z ~U~~ ~ ~ MERIDIAN fi~ `~ 17 18 19 (~ i ~~ERY ~.\ N ~ ~: ~+o Ire ~1 16 15 14 -_. __ .... - ~ NN~N~ BLOCK 2 A ~`~ R~4~ ~r.3 13 S ~ ~ 12 11 10 ` _ ` _ ~.. 3 :RTOWER LN. RK SUB. 2 4 ~~ f 3 5 6 7© 8 9 ' N `. T H NOR ARK SU . N0.2 `~ 4 5 6 7 8 n _. a I« : w~a "en r w`.P . r.Iw •. + Aol °.I cAM-wow! sq WsVCO IM N Nu rM Pw .qr x.. ~e.r. ~Y s ' ~ ~.w LM SYA 6 00f0 p/N ~.~ IIISa U1MO0 S NII A/11VNI17f17i1d •'~ ~ j oxvm 'xv~mx~r~ ~ ~ eN xxva aoxox ~„.,,,,, 3 i r ~ (~ $ ~i F ~ ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~ 3 1 ~ k ~ fE ~ B G W ~ 2 ~ ~~ 9 ~~~~~~~ b~ ~W F ~ ~ ~ \ I~ i j~~ I l I III ~ ~ h ~ si ~ I ~ i i~ a ~~~ ~~~ ; I i ~. i s ( L G ~; ~ > ~I ~ ~ ~' ~ o ~ ~ 1 ~~ ~ ~~,___--- _ ~-- '_ 4 i~ ~~ F s °~ £ s g I ~ g 9 ~ Y ~I ° i ~ i ~ 1 ~° ~ I ° ~~ ~ -s ~~ y ~ ~ ~ i ~o; $ A R I •~ ~ ~ a„ l '~ I ~ 1 ~~ ~4 .~ ~ w ^ ~ ~~ ~>z~ ;~~ ,~. .. ,,.- -------_ Q 8 - ~ -~-------- ---- ~ .: . %' ~ I ~ 1 I ~' '" I 1 ~J~ ~ 1 ~~ ,~ '`, ~' ~ q''~ "s ~~ ~ ..~ gl I . . ~~ YI ~ 1 / ~ i~ o s s '" ~ ~ --- - ~ . ~ 9 A x d o ~ ~ a° , i ~ e ~ \~ t ~ n ~ ~ ~ dl o ~ ~ ~M i tl ~ 8 l~G _ ~~/ ~~ MVIO~BII ~ 177i11i 14Y1! 14V7 ~ • DESCRIPTION OF HONOR PARK N0.3 SUBDIVISION March 15, 1996 A portion of the NW 1/4 of Section 18, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at an aluminum cap marking the center 1/4 corner of Section 18, T.3N., R.1 E., B.M.,; Thence S 89°42'15" W 50.01 feet to a point; Thence N 00°27'58" E 1,334.63 feet to the northeast corner of Honor Park Subdivision No. 2, the Initial Point of this subdivision; Thence S 89°31'22" W 640.37 feet to a point on the north line of Honor Park Subdivision No. 2; Thence N 00°40'03" E 1,048.08 feet to a point; Thence S 89°31'22" W 622.00 feet to a point; Thence N 0°40'03" E 282.50 feet to a point on the southerly right-of--way of Franklin Road; Thence N 89°20'24" E 1,182.04 feet along said southerly right-of--way to the intersection with the westerly right-of--way of Stratford Drive; Thence S 00°27'58" W 882.58 feet along said westerly right-of--way to a point; Thence S 09°04'31" E 456.76 feet to the Initial Point of this description. This parcel contains 21.65 acres, more or less. This description was written from data of record and does not reflect a field survey Michael E. Marks, No. 4998/a~ ~~ V U V~` ~~ 1~~4~~ ~. ~'~ 951004 • 300' Property Owners • of `~ Honor Park #3 Subdivision (Parcel #S 1118212450) March 15, 1996 Page 1 89426000210 Ehno Tiddens, 213 E. 2nd, Meridian, ID 83642 89426000070 Marc & Beverly Banner & James S. Armstrong, 4737 Cochees, Boise, ID 83709 89426000052 Christopher A. Davis, 212 E. 2nd St., Meridian, ID 83642 89426000181 Terry G. & Patricia Glassinger, 126 E. Williams, Meridian, ID 83642 89426000195 Greg A. & Elisa M. Likins, 205 E. 2nd St., Meridian, ID 83642 89426000062 Ryan G. White, 204 E. 2nd St., Meridian, ID 83642 89426000575 Lloyd Cook ET UX, William L. Cook, 4750 N. Five Mile Road, Boise, ID 83704-2715 89426000475 Idaho Power Company, Property Tax Department, P. O. Box 70, Boise, ID 83707 89426000535 Sean H. Miller & Shauna M. Masonholder, 218 E. Franklin, Meridian, ID 83642 81042000165 Jack & Verniece Marshall, 228 E. Williams, Meridian, ID 83642 81042000175 Lynette Kay Rodman, 234 E. Williams, Meridian, ID 83642 81042000182 Sharon Ann Barrows, 215 E. 3rd St., Meridian, ID 83642 81042000183 Berton R. & Deanna L. Spencer, 213 E. 3rd St., Meridian, ID 83642 81042000185 Donald J. Flaten, 2720 N. Venable Lane, Meridian, ID 83642 81042000201 Donald E. & Jazmin C. Cornelius, 1113 E. 3rd St., Meridian, ID 83642 81042000210 Gerald W. & Vera J. Crowell, HC 42, Box 5331, Idaho City, Idaho 83631-9718 81042000220 Larry L. & Carol A. Brown, & Robert & S. L. Obermeyer, 6825 Santa Cruz Dr., Boise, ID 83709 81042150872 Steven D. & Anita M. Ryker, 216 E. 3rd St., Meridian, ID 83642 81042150885 Calvin & Edith Harris Trustees, 200 E. 3rd, Meridian, ID 83642 81042150890 Michael B. Scherer, 208 E. 3rd, Meridian, ID 83642 81042105915 Westley M. & Rajean Weast, 322 E. Franklin, Meridian, ID 83642 81042150895 Betty Ann Thierhause, 3467 Dalton Lane, Boise, ID 83704 300' Property Owners of Honor Pazk #3 Subdivision (Pazcel #S 1118212450) Mazch 15, 1996 Page 2 85672030010 Rev. Butterfield 1993 Trust, D. H. & J. L. Butterfield Trustees, 2833 Autumn Way, Meridian, ID 83642 85672030030 R. Z. & C. M. Brown Trust, R. Z. & C. M. Brown Trustees, P. O. Box 579, Eagle, ID 83616 85672030950 Holland L. & Debra L. Houfberg, 685 N. Linder Road, Eagle, ID 83616 85672030970 Meridian Industrial Pazk, P. O. Box 8204, Boise, ID 83707 85672030990 Thad J. & Lynn E. Thomas, 1155 Jostin Place, Meridian, ID 83642 S1118121150 Meridian Cemetery District, Terry McMorrow, Secy, 1009 W 4th, Meridian, ID 83642 S 1118131250 Hendren's Inc. ET AL, P. O. Box 9077, Boise, ID 83707 83720880200 Nima S. Panahi ET AL, 11132 W. Treeline St., Boise, ID 83704 83720680400 William A. Hon & Roland L. Hon, & William E. Norris, P. O. Box 828, Boise, ID 83701-0828 83720670600 Dynamite Mazketing, Inc., 310 E. Watertower Lane, Meridian, ID 83642 83720680900 Richazd Alan Elliott, 675 Thrush Drive So., Big Beaz Lake, CA 92315 Nine Mile Creek, Nampa/Meridian Irrigation District, 1503 1st Street South, Nampa, ID 83651-4395 S 1118212610 City of Meridian, City Hall, 728 Meridian, Meridian, ID 83642 S 1118223120 Meridian Dairy Show, Gerry Mattison, 1892 W. Hendricks, Meridian, ID 83642 S1 1 1 8223080 Western Ada Recreation, P. O. Box 566, Meridian, ID 83680-0566 zx:s DSLD Is asks ~-L~Pa~ :o coxur.:ns _aaL DlsCAZPTI01! Ot PaA[r_ [ _ - V•N~•N•.V.M ~+M.MM.MM.,MY.YM..M..V'M'MM'MM'MM.MMM V V Y N .) .I V•N Y..V N M V. MN . . r'~=~~QLTTTCLAIM DEED ~ ~"~S~]' 9~A1 7 ~. !. ERECEiYED RCS.A'i'~ L. HOSI. as h1a gala aad aaparat• psoP.rtt •a dine/oaad FORYALI j, b7 . Attaasaat reeosdad 1/10/90 as Inatrwent to. 9001380. and KILLIAM A. aOC. a rarsied j, aaa as his cola and aaparat• psopastt as diselosad bt Inacstta-aat saeorded Pireh .1. 19x3. as Lnatremoat io. a31S30:. ;: da hereby oom'et Rine, temw and foener t~ttie claim sa uadislded .S: lateseat !a parcels A. a. - ~~ C. i G in th• baler daserlbad pzopast~ and a 1=.5~ iatasaat Sa pareel• D. L. i f deaeriboL eosposation ~. Dalr~ PIO[LE1 BCRl1RGE CORPOR;.2IO:i. as Ida ho - L ahae addR+a u r ~i • Z'l'1 ;'r :~ 7~ ~lClY , /v ~ i .: ~~ dte foaoenne decoked pRmrea. to•.~tt: ~ ~• •~ ~ Saa the attaehad Lzhibit °A' for lapl daaeriptioa. vhieh bt this saferane• ~` '~ is iaeorporated Kerala. ~~ ,~ , ~ ~ i ' .t~l ~' ~: ~ . ~! ~ ~ ' ~' ~ ;~ ~~ nn I~~~ ~~ j Ada Can„, kMa h ~I :3 Ileawtel PIOMFiR Tu:c CO. ?i~ T~'yL ~ ~3~ ~ '~ S b E ~ ~,~ ~ ~ 3 / ~ 3 ro~ether rnh rhea appunenance. ~~ ~ • ~ ~^ ~•~3+mtar7 S0. 1990 f / ` }1 // / . ` -~ w~~ ~ O.aA ... nOa .la A. HOA ' _ t ~ 7 (I 1 ~ Acx~ro~.socarexr_taai.~i ~~ r,A-s of loAtio, coc~-nr or !!J 1 heresy eeredy Nat this taatneeat e.ea f1:M M Reed Z STA:eOR IDAHO .Cann, o! Ada -.se. ^::nereQeneef Pi~N;_ ^1::r~ •' ~: ~ '• ~ Qt:~t {ay o! Jaaua:v in ' ~ Dafnr me .w ~ e'eheekPta. !~ n s~+minetee pa ter ~ dq ~ ~ .! . tntry pollie. eWy eaeeNM ut GL ~n my f i ~;~1rr and :.. Hon and a A'a A bn ~: k ~1` + o! (n.ee et pye • ~1w~ J°~~~:J ~t'M7a eYn . a . a ta ~ ,~ tlr ~ ~ vlrr ttree s ar• fald arloteotedtad b ee thx °~/ W'Qi~'.'iati r ~.II ~7 Err eia RaeeeMr yt 7 ~ ~ • ~ ~ _3 \eaerY G v- t~t,L.., Ise. Idaho 3 i .: ! 93 7- F.ref ~ ~ ~j EYpOZATIO~ D'1TE: Nai: ta: iR~ r";~; PIC1 R Ti : L r-C~_p? \T v ~'{ r• os.Da cA.rc~ x - r ^ r:llet ±y~.a :o r_i ant sts sn.a • ass. acne el ~ aia vac tole Aso ; sects. kYAa e3~oa • ran 3"'•:700 . a>~isii '~-' P1IACSL 111 Trit NpRT1~tLY S1S.9~ lE1T Ot Tx! Ov~R ~ Sai 110RTlA1ESS 0 O! SECTION if. SOY!lS1ti! 3 NORT'x, RJ1110t 1 :; ..:. .~ EAST, LYIIIO ylsTlllLY Ot Sat IIESSl1tLY Link O! Sat COONTY 1107-D (SSR71T!'ORD DRM) !AIlCEI. at OT Tat NolerlolEST OuARTafe OT SECTZOII 10. IN SOMNSNI! 3 NOATa, 11J1NOt 1 EASS O! SAt 802x1-1~1,2DiAi1. ~; SN ADA COtlNSl, 5~111i0. Il! x001[ 170 0! 'ORSIONS 0! EatID T>fi1CT ' ~~ ! Ta08t P E~Z! DEEDi AS ll1QEL 96 AliD itl, >lERAIlDf O! ADi- Oa1NTl, s?ASt Q>! ,-y~.A { _ 11im ~T a1oGiNNI110 11T Z'at •01Rl41iSS OORNiI> OtEC'!'SON lt. E 0>r Txt NatsallssT 0• ~- :. ~ ` ..:~ NO!!lQAfS OW 'lOY1W1i! S 1101!!x. RANGE 1 E11tT, SOZSt~M:RIDI]1N. 1-Di1 COlil!!!, TaitJCE "t~<,. iDA110, Tat REAL POIN! Of ffiOIZHtiNOi ft0110 !aE YESSi1lLY 80>A~ARY OT 9A2D NORSaEASS ~-'. ' NO1.Y ~M~ ON TNEION 1sN~Y ~ T lO "; 1 SO DInANCR O HA11K 0! J1 SS1tEAN CALLED NiNt MILE CREE1Ci TRENCE ;~ ~ . + T~ETDtLY PAMLLEL R'0 Tat. fOt?lltatLY HOlA1DAAY OT SECT20N la. NOaSriEAtT 0- SRt NOa?riMESS OQAATEIl, "°° .. 71 DiSTJ1NC! O! 622 TEES TO ~ lOZNli TaE~ OT ~D . '~'Y~ SO11TaE1lLY !>tRALLEL TO Sat MitTERLY aOtlNDA>rY - SECSiON N011TaEA1'i' QtiARTEit, 0! T!!E NO1ClriMlaS 0• ~ Y NS~ iaTANCE OT lOSO TEE? TO 71 lOI E O 11, 71 D HOUNDJ-RY Of 1AID NOi1T1RAS! ONAlITl1t ~- QlJARSER, SECTION 11i TN_ENCt tiiL1 S m i ~ ~ ~ '`: '` NT OI 1tE11L P ON l0 TO 'lltE OC'••2 OUARTL'R 0 TriE NORTItIitST 9 OT HEtiINNINO. ' D a= O AND E .11 'OOx ( S0137 HY DEED RECORDED t1MDER II~T MENT N0 OT DIED 11 1110E X90). lARCEL Ci Trit NORTHERLY t10.~9 TEES 01 TNUT TORTZON O! 00'VEf?HIiNT LOT " -:~i~. 2 IN TRE•NORTNMEST OtlARTElt OT HECTION lt. TOMNEHZ! ~ NQ11Ta, RANGE 1 EAST OT Tat BOISE-FtQ1tiDI11N IN AD11 COtlNTY, ZDAriO ~:.„ (THE tOUT1llRLY LIN! OT MNIC11 If lAR11LLEL TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OT TriE 900TH 1111I.T OT 8712D NORTHMEST OO~R OT tECTZON ..'~ 11, t71ClP? Tri1-T PORTION LYING MLST OT THE EJ1STlRLY 6INE O! 'lIiECZTYGOTf MtRIDZ1U1 8Y DD82m RECORDED M71YT2~i 1976 CINDER INtTltllt4}iT NO. 7620216 e t PARCEL D• A PA7tCSL•OF LAND BEING ALL T11AS POItTZON OF THE NORTIi )t71i.F OT THs NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUART6Il O! THE SOUTHEAST O ~ ' SECT20N 18, TOWNSHZA 3 HORYH, 1'tANCL' 1 PAST. DOZSE•MERIDIJW, LYllla NORTH OF THE RIGHT 0! WAY DOUltOAIeY OF SMTER:'TATB 80N, PRO~ita.? ' NO. 1-80-N-1(29 )a5 HZCHYAY SUItVI'Y: AND BEGINNING AT A POZNT ON THE SL•'CTZWi LIME tiHZCH BBAR'1 SOUTH 0.18' SO' 4L• ST,' 1,115. ~: r'Et`r F'tOM TJE QUARTER SEClZON CORNER COMMON To SECTZOM:u 17 AND ls, TOYttS:IIP 3 1JORTfl, R)INCt . 1 EAST, eOZSE-MERIDIAN; :'llk2•fCL•' souTH o•18'so- WE.sT, ALONG THE SECTION LIMA, 21a.ao FELT r0 rat •. SOUTH SI)CtEENTH SECTION CClttlt~t COq~ON TO SECT10N8 19 JNID 181 THENCB SOUTH 89.25'50• WEST, ALONG TlIY. 43XTEBMTH 4BCTZON LI?18, 1,325.20 _ 1~_E'P TO THE SOUTIIPJV'T :IX'tEF:ttsN $BCTION CDC Qi~ '11110 ... `^~ ~•~ SEC'.'ZON 18: THENCE NORTH 0.17.15• EAST ALONG THE SZ~[T1•aNTH sECTZON LIMB. 1.327.52 FEET To THE EAST CENTER SIXTSLTI'!!! SECT20N CORNER OT SAID SECTION 18: TltENCE ''" NORTH e9.2o'03• EAST. dee.u FS.CT To ,- POINT ON THS CENTSRLIMt OF' ~~_ A CERTAIN IRRIGATION LATERAL: Z'1481lCE SOUTH 23.42'10• EAST ALONO SAID CLtI'lERLZNE, ~Sb.1S FEET ?0 71 POINT: THENCE SOUT3 33•Sd'30• CAST ALONG SAID CENTERLIMB, 392.37 FBbT TO J1 POINT: THENCE s- C ~` SOUTH 39.01'10• EAST ALONG SAID CL'NT81tL1lIE, 171.19 FBBT r0 A POINT: THENCE ' SOUTH a5•S8'10• EAST. 6.1.29 FCET TO THE POIN! 01 DEGINNINQ. PARCEL !: A PARCEL OP LAND IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OP THE SOUT))EAST QUAR"EA OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANC3 1 EAST OT DOISt~ rtERZDIAN, IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, DC~CRZHED AS FOLLOMSi BEGINNING AS A POINT ON THL' SECTION LINE WHICH DEAR.T SOUTH 0.18'30' WEST 303.35 FELT FttCM THE QUARTER SECTION CORNR COMMON TO SECTIONS 17 AND 18, TOWNSHIP 3 NOitTH, RANGE 1 EAST, 80ZSE-r.ERZDIAN: THCNCC 30UTH 89•.3'30• WES?, a16.28 FEC•T TO A POZMT: THENCB NORTH 23.42'10• NESS, 5a.36 FELT TO A POINT: THENCB NORTH 89.23'50• EAST, 438.d2 FCL'T TO A POINT ON SJ-ID SECTION LINES THENCE SOUTH 0.18'30• WEST, ALONG THE P.CCTION LINt 50.01 f3lT TO THs POINT OF BCCZNNING. L5'CAL COYTZaU_D , •- pmt' F'~ tZP 3 NORTB. BFwINNIt~G AT A STONE AS Til.:' :R:"!!'.tEST CORNER OF THE '7!E pUARTER OF THE NORTH[!uT CV~"'~JCOt~IOi~fO• ~~P0AIl1~Of RJ-NCE 1 EAST, BOISE-M•`-•RID•:,N, ~ .~ A yTONE. THE REAL QI7ARTER SEC;'ION LINE 7.•26 GtA•N~ BEGINNING: CONTINUING SCC:IUN LINE 32.85 C~ CF ~E ~_ SOUTH AIANG THE QUAR=£R SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE ::OR:'ttWLST QV~T ~ '1!S QUARTER OF SAID SE~IO:i X110 NORTHWEST QU71RT EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LIME OF '' ~+0.07 C8A21'~S SOUT1lEAST OuARTGit 3f S~:'ION 18 A DZS:ANCS OF ~~ O! T!!E TO T!!E SOUTH ITT colutl:lc Ufy 'C'fION~ a tyTtl~ ~ OF THE SOUTHWEST QU~T~ OF S.AI ~ OF THE NORTH ALONG THE FAST LINE OF :.AlD NORTHWEST Qw-~T SOUTHWEST QUARTER Ai`O TttL' ::JtTfHWEST GUST THENCE SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER. 32.4, CHAINS TO A STONE: _ WEST PARALLEL TD ~ DISTANCE UFC Uf10 CHAINS TO THE POINT O! SECTION 18, BEGINNING. DARTER OF PAR~L G: SOUTHU=S.p QO%`RTER OF THE SOUTHEEST Q ADA Tt4J-T PORTION OF THE BOISE-MERIDIAN, SECTION I8, TOWNSHIP 3 NOR':tt, C~,tiCE 1 EEST, COUNTY, IDAHO, LYING NORTH Or It:PERSTATE !lICHWAY NO. Ba. AE1D EAST OF THE G,yTERLINE OF NINC• yZ:.E C12EEK. EXC~ DITCH. CA?tAL, W.TER .,It0 :•iINERAL RIGHTS. • :di5 DEED 15 Bs.1~G iZi-ns"OdDED iO CLiJ:::. :r. P-91764 3a OT P:.RCIL C. -•"^- -:5~;.:::::5 • J..M N.•~ NµN.YN.M.NA•MKM.MMM1!•iWMMMg4YMMMIM %M iNM.M M V..Y. y V.V II V.M. NY •- l~G ~~ QUITCLAIM DEED 90 .s v yoz~l~ ~oooy FOR VALUE RECII~~ PIONEER EZQIAICGE CORPORATION, as Idaho cozporatlon. dO herM`' CD1'•`••'~"a• ranee atd f«e•~r ytat tlaatt ics entire latezeat wltleh !a as uadieided ~a•ezest Sn parcela A. D C aa cc of t}te attached iie a1 deee~ t11on aad an untielded b5. tatezeee SII parcels D ~, .~•W F of eae attached le~ai deee.~~tion ~` t.Z'»IAY E. RORRIS. ~ as urovrsied aan. :j 4 •'tto•e adaew u P.0. Eos 146. Sun Caller. Idaho 43733 ij i the ' " ?3. i, toue.~ deetxtbed prm„b, toeie: 3; ~ See the attached Erthiblt "A" foe lesal deserlptlon. vhleh Dr chin ~' ~~, setereace is iacospesated hesela. ~; ~! ~: ~ Ej• y is - $: ': A ~~ 7 ~• rq $$~~ .J S• . j. Asa ~'•~1: Iselle Y ~{ ~« ~ T r ;fit ~•a.. «PIG9EER TRIi G0. ~' P .... °"'i~w~ra~A TG 'i °> ~ ~ ; ~ ~r~~N !y ~ T_ ~ a j^ ~ - ~ rotrtxr rnh then e;purtenaekee• a Da:e~ Janwzr 70, 1990 ~ := ~ ~* r• ~ i~ 3 C ~ y Yf r• ~ ~ f1 ~1 .~' ~' ~/ .. i ~ 3 yitaaa ?. Spec Preeldeat Ruby Be es, Seerecarr ~ ACiC.\OY.'LEDG3IENT•Wzporat~ ' ~ .'•y 7a~ OF ~ Cttoatr Of / f4LTCF . fe. '! On this day of . in the year of ~_ . before me !~ . a aocary pabl[c„ pe-soaaUy appeared -Jasea P. Soeek and Ru~• 3ecket • icnaw•tfosidentiffedtoatetobethe President aad the Seeretar• ''.:l., ~ '• 3 oftheeorpozationthate:eeatadeMiaaaurneatorthepetaoa! whoe:ec~tRdtlte' K . R :! said corporasim, and aclmowledEed to ate that etreh ewte~-.fhe ~i~ JI! .y; 3 ,atarr P'abli~. ~~\~T L ~ ~ 3 Residinf n: • ~~ ~ t/~ ' ~ • _ M~• Cornmiesion Expires: ~~ PION:.=~ T:~~:, Cc~i~~.~~' ~. .. ~ ~' :~ OR.on ctxrerv ~ L'1 Mea Save Stns ! lose. IdMS RTaQ2 f'OQ '?R•6~70 fR~ tt! ~aryt Cate Red ~ lent. idrr t770e ~ f'.Ott 3'7.: ~p ~j •rwvrww-w-.r+w•.-wRVV..-~,•~....~rvw~-v-ww•..•.....~.-w+._.,,,•,_..--.,•..-.: •.. :. . - a~eualT •A' PARCaL As THt MORTtODIf.Y 323.94 rEET Or Tat SOUT8E7lST QWIRTER Qr TMt NOR?HfiE$T QUARTII! Or 8DGTZ0N 18. TOMNSHZP 9 NORTH, RANQ 1 IaST. LYING WL9TERLT Or THE WESTERLY LING Or Tat COUNTY R071D (S77U1TrO1iD DitlVt) . PARCEL as THE ~~~ ~~ ~ THE ~' Oi1~lRTE1i Or SECTION 18, IN TOYNSHZP 3 NORTI[, RANGE 1 EAST Or !HE HOZSa-MERIDL111i, ZN ADA COUNR7, ID71H0, EXCEPT THOSt POiRTI0N8 Or SAID SRACT DZSCttffiD Ili s001C 170 Or DEEDB AZ PAGaS 96 AND 141, REC01lDS Or ADA COUlRl, STATa Or IDA110i AND BZCapT HEOIlItiIl10 AT TH! 80tlS7iWEST Cwt Or TAS ~ oaARTER or THS NoRTHwasT oc:ARTER, sacTION ls, TOYNtHIP 3 NaieTH, RANCt i Ei~3l, sozsa-NPRIDIAN, ADA CoUtR7, . zaAiw, THa RsAL POINT or BaGIN1iINt3: THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY' HOUNDJIRY Or S71ZD lARTREAST 0U11RSE1t Or SHE N0R?HWE9T OU7IRTER, SECTZOt/ 19. A DISTANCE Or lOSO lEET TO A POINT ON Tfia NORTHEASTERLY HANt Or A STREAl1 CALLED NZNE MLE CREEKS TlIENCE EASTERLY PARALLEL SO THE S0UlF03RLY DOUNDARY Or SAID - rroRTHEAST WARTER or THE ~ OUARrER, SECTION 18, ~~: A DISTANCE Or 622 !'EET TO A POINT: THENCE SOVlRLRLY PARALLEL TO THE WESTERLY sOIJNDARY Or SAID NORTfiEAST CUARTDt, Or SHt MOR17iWEST OUARSEIi. SECMON 18, A DISTANCE Or 1030 TEES TO A POINT ON TRa SOUTRERLY sOUNDARY Or SAID NORTlIEAST pUARTER Or !!is NORTHWEST ouARTER, sscrsoN le: THSNCS .. WESTERLY ALOlq SHE SOUTHERLY DOUNDARY Or THS 9AID NoRSHEAST QUARTER Or THE NORTHWEST SECTZON 18 TO THE REAL POINT .: OP BEGINNING. AND EXCEPT THa NORTHERLY 2s rEaT coNVSYEa To sTATE or zDAHo sY DEED RscoRDea UNDER INBSRlMENT No. 1301]7 tHOac 182 ~. Or DEED A PAGE 490). '+ PARCEL Cs THB NORTHERLY 410.49 ruT Or THAT PORTION 0! OOVER?1MENT LOT ;a;; 2 IN THa.NOR?HMEST QUARTER Or SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGt 1 EAST Or THE BOISE-1tE1tIDIAN IN ADA COUNTY, ZDAHO _ (T![E SOUTHERLY LINE Or WHICH 23 PI-JtJ1LLEL ?O TH! NORTHERLY o: LZNE Or THE SOUTH HALT Or SAID NORTHWEST OIJARTER Or BECTION t?:~~ 18, EXCEPT TNA! PORTION LYINO WEST 0- THE EASTLRLY LINE 0/ :r STATE NZOHM7IY 69 AND ALSO l.XCEPT THAT PORTION OONVEYED TO THE CITY O- MERZDIAN HY DEED RECORDED M71Y 27, 1976 UNDER INSTRtJMaNT N0. 7620286 ... ~'§ 1 -.~. ;'_ • r NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., on April 9, 1996, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of William Hon, for a Preliminary Plat for land located in the NW 1/4 of Section 18, T.3N, R.1 E, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is generally located South of Franklin Road, West of Stratford Drive. Applicant requests Preliminary Plat approval of the parcel of land above described for 19 Commercial (C-G) lots for Honor Park No. 3. A more particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Dated this 21st day of March, 1996. WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., C LERK NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., on June 18, 1996, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of William Hon, for a Preliminary Plat for land located in the NW 1 /4 of Section 18, T.3N, R.1 E, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is generally located South of Franklin Road, West of Stratford Drive. Applicant requests Preliminary Plat approval of the parcel of land above described for 19 Commercial (C-G) lots for Honor Park No. 3. A more particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Dated this 30th day of May, 1996. WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., ITY CLERK I ~ Mayor ROBERT D. CORRIE HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 • Fax 288-2501 City Council Members CHARLESROUNTREE GLENN BENTLEY RON ANDERSON KEITH BIRD 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Fax (208) 888-4218 November 8, 1999 Idaho Power Company 10790 W. Franklin Road Boise, ID 83709 322-2000 388-2402 *Dena 388-2021 fax 388-6924 388-6532 fax 322-2032 Re: Street Lights for Honor Park Subdivision #3 Phase # 1 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2311 • Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 • Faz 887-1297 The street lights have been installed by the developer in Honor Park Subdivision #3 Phase #1. These are 250 watt high-pressure sodium lights on steel poles, owned by the City of Meridian with a maintenance agreement with Idaho Power. The two (2) street lights are located at. Lot 14 Block 2 E. Schiller Lane & S. Stratford Lot 16 Block 2 E. Schiller Lane See attached map for additional information. Please use this letter as your authority to activate these street lights. Sincerely ~_--_ ,~:~:C/ William G. Berg, Jr. City Clerk Enclosures ^ 4 :~ 7U.-~-19yl~- 11 ~ ,12 t Fi1}ft ~ • •. -.•.,• •• •`• ~~~ 1 1 c ~ ~ ~ v .~-~•~c M~ r , uc~ ac - - _ ~U dt~~/1Gy/ r.eG ~~~ e~.rn W10fftGROU!!0 GJlDl.2 Np ~ ~2~1 ~ott11 t/o aa1 / I 1 ~ ° ~ wusi Rio tea. / R ~ k s ebatt5 ~h YS - ~ I 3 rn.u, >I/o xoa I r 1 ~~ tb s-,xtEr p..e~rc , I7 _C g M 19 I 1larth FUIVflE Ptv15fS ~FUTUaE vwA6~,`. E PiL-6E ~ PMhSZ. 1 0.0C1[ 2 1\ la l ~[ p14>,rcry cable .e 7~l0 4 123 kr n 4' m.OU71 / ~ ~ _ - _ _ _ S-pMw . r_ e~le ~.~ aaldriif lo~ord apdt let out d so[.tOn ' •.looote F-se u• corm ar pee lee~r~oe m eMr S ~., - r~•,•, a 54 ,; , ~ °~ ~" 2r~ ~,y-n' NP.S ~.ET 4l~'? ~.,, 1 ~ az 1 l_.. .- ..___ _.. Clrf~~ A.~.~ 6, ~ ~"- ~ °~u ~` ,.~ `;'° r.~ ~,.~ ~n nbt. oere.c was ern 6nas hvr~ac' 1 mart 1 lots ° ~ ^ ca~oo230 ~*od ~••c 12.g kv ~ 125 kv ~~-~ mrclrl-Q 12 _.... rnrnw,ec vv ~~ K~ ~-e--~a )p vda ~ 33 :.+.,~ . To..rII1,y t1.,,~e eea~R-Fa ~wto rn ~ ~ -~_~~ ~;- ' ( - . 1 F_i 3n 1 e B.M. ~, .- _ .. _ c.. (V~ e ~_ ~ar SS.S -14 ~ ~ ~qe~-~ noti1II ~~5 ^ G-.. lJ~-^ - y ^ 7-. ~~ ~ O O 1 - c- L ~ ~ PCflrlal~v+ ~'°"d~~ 3~ No. Wp wew -b. o•l..• •_ _ "`II Ss~- ~z~Z ~ i o - 'v~ o' ~ ~_.. _ mrdn1101 ~ 7 ~'r X0(7 4t1C ^ I ~1 1 .• TQTG~' ~Y'E.61 .aa JUL 2.A '9g 11 31 OCT 14 '99 16 16 TU'•'~ f-. 02 p~OE.@2 x TOTAL PAr,F . 02 +''« PAGE. 02 1 /~ r ~ V~ OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. SMITH, City Treasurer GARY 0. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE 0. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. OENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P 8 Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, OMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL' GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney HU'B OF TRE.-SURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERID AN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-.1433 • FAX (208) 887-181 3 Public WorksBuilding Department ('_OS) 887-221 I Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4143 ROBERT D. CORR(E Mayor MEMORANDUM: Tc>~ Will Berg, City Clerk Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer From: Harold Hudson, Electrical [nspector Re: STREET LIGHT ELECTRICAL INSPECTION COUN .I MB R WALT W. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M.ROUNTREE GLENN R. BENTLEY P & Z COMMIGSION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman MALCOLM MACCOY KEITH BORUP RON MANNING BYRON SMITH Date: /O-Z~-Siy I have inspected and approved the electrical wiring and associated components for S street lights in .vow. .4~,~ .Idaho Power Co. can now proceed with the activation. 2~~~ ~'~~ --~ Harold Hudson, Electrical Inspector ~~~~~ ~J ~'J - t 1999 CITY OF ~i~;~,IDI~v C:\OFFICEIW PW(MGF.NERAI,IELF.CINSP. MMO ELECTRICAL RERMIT OWNER/ARF'LICANT-------- MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT F'. 0. POX 8~8 POISE, ID 8701 `~8/iZ~~~-~~00 T: CONTRACTOR------------- ALLOWAY ELECTRIC 14E~ GROVE ST. POISE, I D 870 208/44-~:5~7 • Iss~_ied: 10/18/59 Permit No: 1558E --------------PROPERTY LOCATION--______________________ I 1 HONOR F'ARF~. #G i I Lot: Flock: Long Legal: I S~_ib: HONOR PARK #~ S: I Parc No: I ______________DESIGNER----_____------------------____-- I i , I ~0~/1211ZIIZt-V_li7_100 PROJECT INFO--------------------------------------------------- F'r.j Val~_~e: ~?,, 955.00 I Temp Service: F'r.j Type: STREETLIGHTS I Residential Service: Occ Type: COMMERCIAL I Number of Rooms: Occ Grp: Occ Load: I Electrical Heat: Cnstr Type: I N~_~mber of Circ~.tits: Land Use: (Other:streetlights I PROJECT NOTES--------------------------------------------------~ 250 WATT H. F'. S. -- LOT 14, PLN. ~=' / LOT 1 E, PLK 2 PROJECT FEES ASSESSMENT_______________________________________________________ Amount Paid: $19.55 TOTAL ELECTRICAL FEE: ~1~9.55 Palance Due: X0.00 p~ usr nR6T sTREE7 r ~ _ - -'SQ~a - avr_-xaa ~ lap~11-~ x ~, it ~ ~i s ,~ ~ - d ii ~ ! ~ ~ ' ul~~ - t~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ° u 1° '~ ~ y~ 1~ M ! 8 5 ~ 4 ~ 8 ~ ~ - ---- ~~ ~ ,. - ~~ ~~4 ~ r---,~--- I ~~ ~ >i ~ ~ ~ / ~~ ~ r ~~ w ~€ i I ' ,~ rv i / ~ ~ r 1~ - ~ ~~ ~~ / I II • ~ ~ i ~y.A~ { 1 ~ w 7 ~ ~ a• ; " ~ ,~;' I ' I r ~, .-~ , , ~ I ,. .- - ------ - --- -- - ,. s ,- ----- ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ - x~ ~I ~ e a;, ~ s ~" ; etl~ r ~ ~ ;• ° ; ~ / , ii ii i • i =2 ~ Z ~ G N s i i M RY ~ ' ~ I M I i _ _ .+i C s i e _ ,i \, ~ ~ e i ~ x ~' ~n 1 r , ,~ - - -- - i ~~ ~ ~ ~ i~ i! ~ ;~ u ~ o ~ i~ 1 I L i II I I ~~~~ i i j I I ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ II ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ _ ~'~~~~3~t~a ~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~ HONOR PARK ~3 a'OO"1O"°11°E'~ ![ERIDIAN, IDAHO PRELIMINARY PLAT ,,,, S ~~ ~ ~ ~a V~ '03/t~/Ge 01~ GROW-iR[J ~~I'- tOD' DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR HON NORRIS PARR DECLARANTS, the owners of that certain parcel of real property located in Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described on the legal description attached hereto as EXHIBIT A: HEREBY DECLARE AND ADOPT the following COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS which shall apply to and run with the property described on EXHIBIT A (referred to herein as "HON NORRIS PARK" or simply "Park" or "Property"). ARTICLE 1 Covenants Running With The Land 1.1 This Declaration establishes, for the mutual benefit of Declarants and future owners of the property or of any Lot therein, protective covenants, conditions, restrictions, encumbrances, charges and liens (collectively referred to herein as the "Restrictions") that are binding upon the Property. These are expressly and exclusively for the use and benefit of the Property and of each Lot and of each and every person or entity who now or in the future is an owner of the property or of any Lot therein. 1.2 The term "Owner" means and refers to Declarants, as present owners, and to each and all persons who hereafter acquire title to any Lot, or become entitled to purchase any lot, or at any time hereafter have a possessory interest in any lot as tenants or otherwise, and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. The term "Declarants" include related parties, entities or successor entities of Declarants. 1.3 These Restrictions shall run with the land. Nothing herein shall be construed to cause this Declaration to apply to or bind any other property of Declarants not specifically described on EXHIBIT A. However, these Restrictions are intended to benefit other property of Declarants in proximity to the subject property, which other property may not be bound by these Restrictions. ARTICLE 2 Equitable Servitudes 2.1 Declarants intend to subdivide and sell, exchange or lease Lots therein for various business, commercial, office, HON NORRIS PARK RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS - 1 • • multi-family residential and light industrial uses; and desire to subject the Property to the Restrictions in order to implement a uniform, general and common plan designed to preserve the value and high quality of the Property for the benefit of the Declarants and other owners of the Property. 2.2 The Property is subjected to these Restrictions to insure the appropriate development, improvement and maintenance of each Lot; to protect the Declarants and Owners of Lots against improper use which could depreciate lot values; to preserve the natural beauty of the Property; to provide a means of preventing the erection of improperly designed or constructed structures; and, in general, to provide for a high quality of improvement on the Property, and thereby to enhance the value of investments made by Declarants and Owners of Lots on the Property and on adjacent properties. ARTICLE 3 Incorporation of Additional Areas 3.1 Declarants shall have the right, at their sole discretion, to designate additional lands to be made subject to the provisions hereof, or to provisions substantially similar hereto, by the recording of a designation referring to this Declaration and by setting forth therein in what respects, if any, the restrictions covering the additional designated lands differ from these Restrictions. ARTICLE 4 The Property Subject To This Declaration 4.1 The Property and each Lot shall be held, and shall be conveyed, transferred, sold, hypothecated, encumbered, leased, rented or used, subject to these Restrictions. Any instrument executed in connection with any such transaction must include a reference to this Declaration. Any such transaction may be referred to herein as a "transfer". 4.2 The acceptance by any person or entity of a deed, lease or other instrument of transfer of property subject to these Restrictions, or which is in the chain of title to such property, including judicial foreclosures, trustee's sales and tax deed sales, shall be deemed an acceptance of these Restrictions. The burden and obligation to comply with or perform in accordance with these Restrictions shall be part of the consideration for the transfer of any Lot pursuant to such deed or other instrument of transfer; and, the acceptance of any instrument of transfer shall be deemed an agreement by the transferee that Declarants, or any other Lot owner(s), shall be entitled to enforce all of these Restrictions. HON NORRIS PARR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS - 2 • ARTICLE 5 Architectural Committee 5.1 Declarants hereby establish an architectural committee ("Committee") to perform the duties specified for it herein. The initial Committee shall be composed of the following: William A. Hon, Declarant Roland L. Hon, Declarant William E. Norris, Declarant William Briggs, P.E. Engineer A resigning or retiring committee member may be replaced by a majority vote of the remaining committee members. Any three ( 3 ) members shal l constitute a quorum, and the signatures of any three (3) members shall constitute consent and approval by the Committee. The address of said Architectural Committee shall be: HON MORRIS PARK Architectural Committee c/o William A. Hon Post Office Box 828 BOISE ID 83701 When Declarants no longer own any portion of the Property (or additional adjacent property to which these Restrictions have been applied), they may designate a new or successor Architectural Committee, the membership of which shall consist of not fewer than three (3) Lot Owners and one or more professional architects or engineers. Any member(s) of such new or successor committee may be removed and replaced by the vote of not less than a majority of all Lot Owners, which majority must be in fee' ownership of not less than fifty-one percent (51%) of all lots then included in the property subject to these Restrictions. No Committee member shall be personally liable for any good faith action or inaction taken or not taken pursuant to these Restrictions. ARTICLE 6 Plans and Approvals 6.1 Design Standards: All buildings, improvements and landscaping of any kind shall conform to the HON MORRIS PARR DESIGN STANDARDS ("Design Standards") as may be adopted from time to time and which are on file with the Architectural HON MORRIS PARR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS - 3 • • Committee, and which are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 6.2 No structure, improvement or landscaping (herein referred to collectively as "Improvements") on any Lot shall be constructed, nor alteration to the exterior of a structure or improvements or landscaping be made, unless preliminary and final architectural drawings, plans and specifications therefor, showing adequately each exterior element thereof, including without limitation color scheme, design, elevations, location on Lot, grading and drainage, excavation, fill, landscaping, signs, parking, loading, storage and refuse areas, walls, lighting, irrigation, utilities (herein collectively referred to as "Plans") shall first be submitted to and approved in writing by the Committee. The Plans shall also detail to the satisfaction of the Committee the traffic, noise and odors that can reasonably be anticipated from the Improvements to be constructed. 6.3 Approval shall be based among other things on adequacy of site dimensions; conformity and harmony of external design with neighboring structures and uses; effect of location and use of Improvements on neighboring sites, operations, improvements and uses as well as compatibility with surrounding development and conformance with the adopted design standards. 6.4 Prior to submission to governmental authorities, the Lot Owner shall submit three sets of preliminary Plans, in such form as may reasonably be required by the Committee for approval. Within thirty (30) days after receipt thereof, the Committee may either (1) approve the Plans or (2) reject the Plans, stating the reasons for the rejection and, where appropriate, the changes, modifications or corrections which the Committee requires as conditions for approval. 6.5 Following approval of the preliminary Plans, the Lot Owner shall cause final Plans to be prepared and shall submit them to the Committee for approval. The final Plans shall be defined as all documents required to be submitted to the relevant governmental agencies precedent to the issuance of a building permit. 6.6 In the event the Committee fails to approve or disapprove the Plans within thirty (30) days after receipt thereof, such approval will not be required so long as the Plans are in conformance with the Design Standards. 6.7 The Committee may disapprove any and all Plans submitted on any reasonable ground, including the following: (a) Failure to comply with any of provision of these Restrictions including the "Design Standards"; HON NORRIS PARK RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS - 4 • (b) Failure to include information requested by the Committee in the Plans; (c) Incompatibility of exterior design or material with any other structure previously approved by the Committee; (d) Inadequacy of the number of on-site parking spaces or objection to the design and location of the parking area or spaces, loading docks, storage and refuse areas, walls fencing, irrigation, lighting, utility placement, landscaping, signing or grading; (e) Objection to the color scheme, finish, style of architecture, height, bulk, or appropriateness of a proposed improvement relative to nearby improvements, whether existing or proposed, approved by the Committee; (f) Objection to the landscaping plan as not conforming to other uses or approved plans; (g) Any other matter which, in the judgment of the Committee, would render the proposed improvement or use discordant with other improvements on the Property, either then existing or planned, previously approved by the Committee. 6.8 In the event an Owner does not commence construction within three (3) years after approval of Plans, said approval shall terminate; and such Owner shall not thereafter engage in any construction on the Property without first resubmitting Plans and securing the approval of the Committee. After construction has commenced, it shall be diligently pursued; and, in any event, it shall be completed within one (1) year from the date it is commenced. 6.9 Responsibility for compliance with any and all applicable laws, ordinances, codes, or governmental regulations or rules shall remain the sole responsibility of the Owner concerned. No approval granted hereunder shall be construed to impose on the Declarants or the Committee responsibility for the failure of an Owner, or of an Improvement, or of the Plans therefor, to comply with said laws, ordinances, codes or regulations. Neither the Declarants nor the Committee shall be responsible for defects or inadequacies of any kind or nature in the Plans, or in structures or improvements erected; and no approval by the Committee hereunder shall constitute a finding that such Plans, structure or improvement meet the requirements of applicable law, or are adequate, or are free from defects. Failure to comply with this Article 6, or any section hereof, shall constitute a breach of these Restrictions, and shall subject the defaulting Owner(s) to all enforcement procedures hereof in addition to remedies provided by law. HON NORRIS PARK RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS - 5 ARTICLE 7 Regulation of Uses • 7.1 Permitted Uses: Lots may be used for the following uses, if in conformity with Meridian City Zoning ordinances and building codes, and local, state and federal standards: Motel; Restaurant; Retail and Service-Commercial (including motor fuel retail service on designated lots); Financial; Athletic and Health Club Facilities; Office; Multi-Family Residential (on Lots in Block 2 only); Industrial; Research and Development; Warehouse and Distribution; Manufacturing; with such auxiliary uses within buildings on each Lot as may be necessary for the conduct of the primary use thereof, and for no other purpose (except that Declarants may further limit the uses permitted on designated portions of the Property). 7.2 Prohibited Uses: No toxic or hazardous substances or materials as regulated or defined by city, state or federal laws, ordinances or regulations shall be stored or disposed of on the Property or any Lot. No noxious or offensive trade, business or activity shall be conducted upon any Lot, or within the boundaries of the Property; Nor shall anything be done within the Property which would adversely affect the property values of other lots. Provided, however, that fuel or manufacturing materials to be actually used in a product or process which is itself permitted by these Restrictions may be stored or used (in quantities not to exceed four weeks' consumption or use) on a Lot, so long as the facilities therefor comply with all local, state and federal requirements relating to such storage or use. Provided, further, that on a Lot designated for "Motor Fuel Retail Sales and Service", motor fuels and related petroleum products may be stored and sold at retail, so long as the facilities therefor comply with these Restrictions and all local, state and federal requirements relating to such storage, use and sales. There shall be no discharge or emission of offensive odors, gases, steam, smoke, noise or light from any lot. No chemicals or noxious effluent shall be discharged into the storm or sanitary sewerage systems in violation of local, state or federal requirements.. HON NORRIS PARR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS - 6 ARTICLE 8 Maintenance and Repair; Storm Drainage 8.1 No garbage, rubbish, trash or cuttings shall be deposited or left on any Lot unless placed in approved containers, suitably located and screened to avoid unsightly appearance. No building or landscaping materials shall be placed or stored on any Lot until the Owner begins construction of the improvement requiring such materials. 8.2 Dry grasses, weeds, vegetation, leaves, dead trees, shrubs, vines or ground covers, which are unsightly or likely to constitute a fire or safety hazard, shall be promptly removed from each Lot by the Owner thereof. The owner of any lot which abuts a canal or drain ditch shall also remove such unsightly or hazardous vegetation from such canal or ditch bank. 8.3 Landscaping, driveways and other outdoor areas on each Lot shall be maintained in a neat and orderly condition, with all plants and landscaping being regularly watered, trimmed, pruned and tended, free of weeds and debris. After construction of Improvements on a lot, it is required that all areas, not covered by structures, paved or otherwise improved, must be landscaped in conformance with the Design Standards. Also, each Owner shall be required to landscape that portion of his lot abutting, and the unpaved area lying within, a road right-of-way in conformance with the requirements of the Ada County Highway District and the Design Standards; and thereafter to maintain all such landscaping at the Lot Owner's sole expense. 8.4 The exterior of all structures shall be maintained in good and orderly condition and repair, including regular painting, window washing and replacement of broken or unsightly window panes and other exterior elements. 8.5 No trailer, mobile building, shed of other out- building may be erected or located on any Lot, except such temporary trailer, building or shed approved in advance by the Committee, for an on-site office for the Lot owner or his builder, or for the storage of building materials, and then only during the reasonable period of construction of the permanent structure. All construction and improvement work on a Lot shall be scheduled and performed so as not interfere with the use and enjoyment of other Lots by their Owners. 8.6 Auxiliary structures, antennas, cables or other mechanisms related to communications, electrical and mechanical apparatus, equipment, fixtures, conduits, ducts, vents, flues and pipes mounted or placed on roof surfaces, or extending above or beyond the roof line of any building, shall be concealed from view in an architecturally treated manner shown on the plans submitted to the Committee for its approval prior to placement. HON NORRIS PARK RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS - 7 • • 8.7 All on-site electrical, telephone and other utility lines shall be underground; and shall not be exposed on the exterior of any structure, except with the Committee's written consent. 8.8 Drainage: Each lot owner shall restrict peak storm drainage into surrounding canals or ditches, or as permitted by Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District; and shall provide sand and oil traps for cleaning and filtering water which does drain into nearby canals or ditches. All drainage and detention systems and facilities, including sand and oil traps, shall first be approved in writing by the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District prior to installation, and prior to any improvement work by the lot owner. Each lot owner shall be responsible for the maintenance of all such systems required for storm drainage of such owner's lot. In the event a lot owner fails to properly construct or maintain all systems necessary and adequate for the proper drainage of the lot, then Declarants or the Committee shall have the right (but not the obligation) to have such construction or maintenance done; and the lot owner shall be solely obligated for the costs thereof, and shall promptly reimburse Declarants for costs incurred by Declarants or the Committee therefor. ARTICLE 9 Parking, Loading, Storage; Setbacks 9.1 Parking: For each building constructed, the lot owner shall provide parking areas on the lot, laid out and improved in accordance with the plans approved as specified herein, and maintained thereafter in good, orderly and clean condition. Such parking areas shall be improved and paved with all-weather, dust free surfaces, and shall be clearly marked to provide the number of parking spaces, including those reserved for persons with disabilities, adequate to accommodate all foreseeable use requirements of the lot owner and business visitors. No off- site parking shall be permitted. 9.2 Loading: All loading and unloading of vehicles shall be conducted within the lot boundaries. Sufficient loading spaces shall be provided on the lot to serve all buildings and permitted uses on the lot; and such spaces shall be designed and located as to serve the longest vehicles anticipated to load and unload on the lot without extending beyond the lot boundaries. Loading docks shall be set back and landscaped to minimize their exposure from the street. The plans for loading areas and docks shall be included with the building and improvement plans requiring the written approval of the Committee prior to commencement of construction. 9.3 Storage: No materials, supplies or equipment, HON NORRIS PARK RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS - 8 ! • including business owned vehicles not in active use, shall be stored on a lot, except inside a closed building, or behind a Committee-approved visual barrier screening the storage area from the street and from view of adjoining properties, which barrier shall be at least six (6) feet in height. Storage areas shall be located at the rear of the lot, unless specifically exempted by the Committee. 9.4 Setbacks and Other Requirements: All setbacks, landscaping, off-street parking, loading, unloading and storage areas and facilities shall conform to the Design Standards and Meridian City Ordinances. ARTICLE 10 Signs 10.1 No sign of any kind visible from the exterior of the premises (except real estate "for sale" or "for lease" signs not exceeding 8.01 square feet in area) shall be placed or permitted to remain on any Lot or other place on the Property, unless such sign shall have the prior written approval of the Committee. The Committee, as conditions for said approval, may limit the size, content, color, design and duration of existence of any sign. 10.2 All signs shall comply with the Design Standards and Meridian City Ordinances. ARTICLE 11 Enforcement; Defaults; Liens 11.1 Right to Enforce: Declarants, the Committee, the City of Meridian, or any Lot Owner or group of Lot Owners, shall have the right (but not the duty) to enforce each and every covenant, condition and restriction hereof; and shall have all rights and remedies in law or in equity against a Lot Owner in violation or default, and in rem against said owner's lot, for the judicial enforcement thereof, and for damages, costs, expense and attorney fees incurred by the violation, breach or default thereof, or in efforts to cure, correct or mitigate loss or damage in anyway resulting from such violation or default. 11.2 Nuisance and Abatement: The result of every act or omission whereby any Restriction is violated in whole or in part is hereby declared to be a nuisance; and every remedy allowed by law or equity against an Owner, either public or private, shall be applicable against every such result, and may be exercised by Declarants or the Committee, or by an affected Lot Owner as provided above. 11.3 Attorney Fees: Should any action or suit be commenced for the enforcement of the provisions hereof, or for HON NORRIS PARK RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS - 9 damages for the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to costs of suit and reasonable attorney fees. 11.4 Non-Waiver: A failure of Declarants or the Committee to undertake enforcement of a Restriction, or to pursue a remedy for a breach of a Restriction, shall not constitute a waiver thereof, unless an express waiver thereof is in writing and signed by no fewer than two Declarants or two members of the Committee. An express waiver granted as to a particular breach shall not constitute a continuing waiver of subsequent breaches, though similar in nature; nor shall any express waiver as to one lot or parcel be deemed a waiver as to any other lot or parcel. 11.5 Right of Entry; Injunction: Declarants and the Committee shall have the power and right to enter upon any Lot and the improvements thereon without liability to any Owner, or tenant, for the purpose of enforcing any of the provisions of these Restrictions. Declarants and the Committee, and each of them, on their own behalf or on behalf of any Owner or Owners, shall also have the power and authority to commence and maintain actions or suits to restrain and enjoin breaches of these restrictions, or to compel compliance herewith. ARTICLE 12 Duration and Amendment 12.1 Duration: These Restrictions shall run with the land and shall remain in effect until April 30, 2025; and shall automatically renew for successive periods of twenty years unless the Lot Owners of at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the Lots elect to terminate them by recordable instrument(s) of termination filed of record in Ada County, Idaho. 12.2 Amendment: These Restrictions may be amended at any time by written instrument signed and acknowledged by the Lot Owners of no fewer than seventy-five percent (75%) of the Lots; and any such amendment shall not be effective prior to the date it is filed of record in Ada County, Idaho. ARTICLE 13 Covenant Against Partition 13.1 All Lot Owners, and each purchaser of any interest in a Lot, shall be deemed to have consented to these Restrictions and to have covenanted to and with Declarants and all other Lot Owners that there shall be no subdivision or partition of a Lot, and that no parcel or portion of a Lot less than the whole land area thereof shall be sold, conveyed or encumbered. There shall be no right of judicial partition of any Lot. HON NORRIS PARR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS - 10 ARTICLE 14 Construction and Invalidity 14.1 If any provision hereof be adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, or void as against public policy, all other conditions, covenants and restrictions hereof shall remain in force and effect. ARTICLE 15 Obligation and Benefit 15.1 These Restrictions shall bind and benefit the Declarants, the Architectural Committee. the Lot Owners, and the purchasers, lien holders and encumbrancers of any interest in the Property or in any Lot, and their respective successors, purchasers and assigns; but shall not benefit any other person, firm or corporation; nor shall be construed to be a third-party beneficiary contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarants have subscribed these Restrictions as of the date set forth below. Dated: ~VL.7' 2-~ , 1993. Declarants: William A. Hon Rola d L. Han- William E. Norris STATE OF IDAHO ~ ss. County of Ada ) On this date; ~ r ~- ~ 1993 , before me a Notary Public in and for said State personally appeared William A. Hon, Roland L. Hon and William E. Norris, known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. ~~ ': Notary Public for Idaho, Residing at,~d-~-~--~ , Idaho. Commission expires: ~~/7/y~ HON NORRIS PARK RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS - 11 f • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: MAY 19 1998 APPLICANT: HON HON $~ NORRIS ITEM NUMBER: 10 REQUEST• NON DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED AGREEMENT - ~ `~- /~ /~I'U Uy Q v~ ~~ s l~ ~~~~ ~ ~,,~ "' ~~ ~ ~ ,,,.9' ~" ~C OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. • MAY-09-1998 17 56 FROM ~G=~1~~0 YVU 0 L~~ ~~G=~I1V ~ WU ~~G=~L~ TO Cv~l( B COMPANY ~~-~-~~~- FAX N0. ~~~ /~~ 1 DATE __.~~~.~ N0. OF PAGES SENT ._...,.. _ ~ ....._ (Including Transmittal} REPLY REQUESTED COPY TO • GtNEERWG . 1 ~~~~ C~'"Y (~ ~~>~ FROM BRIGGS ~ ENGINEERING, INC. 1111 S. ORCHARD, SUITE 600 * BOISE, ID. 83705 FAX N0.(208)345-2950 TELE N0.(208)344-9700 BEI PROJECT N0. ~701..~~ o-k c/ c. ~cG1~dci. U 5-(9-gs 1111 S. ORCHARD, SUITE 600 ~ BOISE, IDAHO 83705 x (208) 344-9700 FAX NO (208) 345-2950 MAY 09 '98 17 53 8871297 P.01 PAGE. 01 REFERENCE ~~~ ~~ -- ~'- REMARKS ~t.s c,t_ ~r-e./t~~~~-*_-c.. .. tiv~ s ~+~- MAY-09-1998 17 56 FROM TO 8871297 P.02 • NON-DEVELOPMENT AGREEIV~ENT This Non- Development Agreement ("Agreement's is made and entered into this_day of 1998, by and between William A Hon Roland L. Hon & William 1/. Norris , whose address is 3010 W State Street Suite 101, Boise, Idaho 83703 (hereinafter referred to as "Developer" and City of Meridian, a municipality of the State of Idaho (hereinafter referred to as "City"). WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of all real property and subdivision lots contained in the proposed subdivision known as Honor Park Subdivision No. 3 located in Ada County, Idaho, (hereinafter the "Subdivision"), a more particular description of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, Developer desires to record the final plat of the said Subdivision; and WHEREAS, Developer desires to withhold development of street, sewer, water, irrigation and other utility and lot improvements and sale of proposed Lots 17 through 32, Block 2 (hereinafter "the undeveloped Lots") in the said Subdivision, NOW, THI/1tEPORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties of this agreement agree as follows: 1. Developer shall not sell any of the undeveloped lots in the said Subdivision during the term of this Agreement unless this Agreement is first terminated or modified by the parties so as to permit the sale of the said lots, or some of them, upon such terms and conditions as may be agreed upon. 2. Developer shall not install or permit to be installed any improvements for the PAGE. 02 undeveloped lots in the said Subdivision, including, but not limited to, street, sewer, water, irrigation and other utility and Ivt improvements (hereinafter "Improvements") without the prior written NON-DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, Page 1 c:lprojectsl9701131nondevlp, agr MRY 09 '98 17 54 MAY-09-1998 17 56 FROM TO 8871297 P.03 • • consent of the City. 3. At such time as Developer desires to install any of the said Improvements then Developer shall submit a written request to the City which shall contain a detailed description of the Improvements which Developer desires to install together with an estimate of the time and cost to complete such Improvements. The City shall consider the Developer's request therefor and shall, in the reasonable exercise of its discretion, permit the said Improvements to be installed on such conditions as the City may reasonably require including, but not necessarily limited to the requirement that Developer deliver to the City an irrevocable letter of credit or cash deposit and surety agreement in an amount sufficient to secure the Dcveloper's full and adequate performance upon the installation of such stated Improvements in accordance with the detailed description of the Improvements submitted to the City. The amount of the said irrevocable letter of credit or cash deposit and surety agreement will be calculated at the prevailing construction costs as reasonably determined by the City. Developer agrees and understands that the installation of atty Improvements shall be performed in accordance with the City's standards and specifications in effect at the time of actual installation. 4. Developer and City specifically understand and agree that the purposes of this Agreement the status of the undeveloped lots in the said Subdivision will be as though the ftnal plat thereof had not been filed and recorded. It is further understood and agreed that except as specifically contained herein, this Agreement is not intended to nor does it have the e~'ect of altering any previous approvals, conditions or requirements pertaining to the said Subdivision. 5. Developer acknowledges that this Agreement will be recorded in the office of the Ada County, Idaho Recorder in order to provide public notice to prospective purchasers of the temporary restraint on the conveyance of undeveloped lots in the said Subdivision. At such time as NON-DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, Page 2 c:lprojects\970113\nondevlp.agr MAY 09 '98 17 54 PAr,E. 03 MAY-09-1996 17 57 FROM TO 8871297 P. 04 • • Developer has completed the installation of all Improvements as required by the City and other governnnental entities with jurisdiction thereof, this Agreement shall terminate and City shall execute and deliver t4 Developer for recordation an appropriate document releasing the said temporary restraint on the conveyance of the undeveloped lots in the said Subdivision and acknowledging that this Agreement shall have no further force and effect. The cost of recordation of this Agreement and any release of it shall be paid by Developer. 6. This Agreement shall terminate one-year from the date of execution hereof, unless extended by a further written agreement of the parties or unless Developer shall have commenced installation of the said Improvements, whereupon Developer shall have one-year from the date thereof to complete the installation of the said Improvements. In the event this Agreement does terminate by reason of the failure of the Developer to commence and complete the installation of the Improvements as set forth herein, approval for the undeveloped lots in the Subdivision shall be null and void and City shall record a statement that approval for the undeveloped lots in the Subdivision has been voided, whereupon any further development of the undeveloped lots shall require additional approval from the City. 7. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the heirs, executors, administrators, assignees, and successors of the respective parties hereto. 8. Each of the parties hereto agrees to execute any other documents necessary or appropriate to effect the intent of the parties as expressed in this Agreement. NON-DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, Page 3 c:lprojects~9701131nondevl p. ag r MAY 09 '96 17 55 PAGE.04 MAY-09-1998 17 57 FROM TO 8871297 P.05 • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Developer and the City have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. DEVELOPER: William A. Hon Roland L. Hon William A. Norris STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) County of Merced ) On this day of 19 before me, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared William A. Hon ,individual known or identified to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, alld acknowledged to me that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public for the State of Residing at My Commission Expires: (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) County of Merced ) On this day of 19 before me, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Roland L. Hon , individua! known or identified to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he NON-DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, Page 4 c:lprojects~9701131nondevlp.agr MAY 09 '98 17=55 PAGE. 05 . ~ MAY-09-1998 17 58 FROM TO 8871297 P.06 • executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public for the State of Residing at My Commission Expires: (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) County of Merced ) On this day of 19 before me, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared William A. Norris ,individual known or identified to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public for the State of Residing at My Commission Expires: (SE.aL) CITX: ATTEST: William C. Berb, Jr., City Clerk NON-DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, Page 5 c:~projectst9701131nondevlp.agr CITY OF MF,RIDIAN Robert Corrie, Mayor MAY 09 '98 17 55 PAGE. 06 MAY-09-1998 17 58 FROM TO STATE OF IDAHO) S.S. COUNTY OF ADA) CITY OF MERIllIAN r~ L~ 8871297 P.07 On this day of , 19 ,before me, the undersigned Notary Public in and for said State, persona]ly appeared Robert D. Cowie ,known or identified to me to be the Mayor of the City of Meridian, the municipality that executed the within instrument, or the person who executed the instrument in behalf of said municipality, and acknowledged to me that such municipality executed the same. IN WITNESS Wl'-IEI2EOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. Noto.ry Public of the State of Idaho (SEAL} Fesiding at Boise, Idaho My Commission Expires: NON-OEVEt.OPMENT AGREEMENT, Page 6 c:lprojects19701131nondevlp.agr TOTAL P.07 MAY 09 '98 17 55 PAGE. 07 • Meridian City Council June 18, 1996 Page 41 ' MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #11: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HONOR PARK NO. 3 SUBDIVISION BY WILLIAM HON: Van Elg, 1111 S. Orchard, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Elg: Mr. Mayor and Councilmen, this is the current phase of Honor Park Subdivision located just to the east of the Meridian Speedway. In your packets you probably have some drawings that indicate that it is a 19 lot commercial subdivision. However, let me come over to our drawing here. Due to some access problems some alignment problems with ACHD and to simplify the whole issue. We originally had seven lots up here along Franklin Road. ACHD was only going to allow us three access points in two of which have to align with 5th Street and 3rd Street and then one floating access in between. It seemed easier for us and better for these lots to resolve this access issue by reducing the number of lots. So we have a total of 17 lots commercial lots zoned C-G that complies with the comprehensive plan and has the appropriate zoning already established. We have met with staff at the request of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Becky Bowcut and Stan McHutchinson of our ofFce met with staff today to resolve any outstanding issues. I believe that those issues have been resolved. I would open myself up for any questions at this point if you have any. Morrow: So essentially what you are telling us is that the seven lots that. you had before and in our packet now has gone down to five packets. The land there of the 7 was consumed in the five so that the five are just bigger lots? Elg: Larger lots yes, each of the lots is approximately an acre or larger in size. There is one lot that is .94 but in looking that the plat today I believe it might even end up being a little bit larger once we make that alignment. They will probably all be right at an acre or larger. Corrie: You have two accesses on Franklin Road that you didn't have before is that correct? Elg: Correct, there will actually end up being three. (Inaudible) Morrow: And did your lot configuration take into account the expansion of Franklin Road in terms of width? • • Meridian City Council June 18, 1996 Page 42 Elg: Yes Morrow: Do you want to talk a little bit about the issues with respect to, I noted in the minutes from P & Z there was discussion about fences and protecting the existing uses of the baseball park and Fuller park and, I am sorry not Fuller Park, Storey Park, can you discuss those issues? Elg: Sure, Mr. Mayor and Councilman Morrow, I believe what the P & Z indicated to Ms. Bowcutt at their hearing is that they would leave that issue up to the individual lot owners from what I understand. There is an eight foot fence that exists around the ball park here but it stops somewhere in this location here. There is a great deal of if you have been. out to the site there is quite a bit of tall vegetation, tall trees that exist right here south of that fence about an 8 foot fence. The Planning and Zoning Commission suggested I guess that pefiaps in the interest of the people that own this that pefiaps our client would consider putting a fence in for site obscuring to protect the vision of what might be going on here. One thing that we might suggest is either that to leave it as, well to leave it as it is with the existing trees and vegetation. Perhaps we could come bads in and plant some small hedges there in between the trees if you would like, that might be an option. Pefiaps the owner could furnish those trees in lieu of fence and the City could plant them on their side. The trees are separated by about 10 or 15 feet I believe from the property line they are about 10 or 15 feet to the west. The other option that I think is more desirable is that prior to the issuance of a building permit that staff be able to review the proposed use and make a determination as to whether or not a fence would be required due to the nature of the use. If It is going to be some sort of storage yard or something pefiaps they can require the individual owner to put up a fence for vision concerns if necessary. I don't think we would have any problem with that. Morrow: My next question would be with respect to, how do you visualize handling the landscaping requirements and particularly along Franklin Road? Elg: Apparently in the Planning and Zoning Commission it was also discussed and met with staff I believe the owner has agreed to put in a landscape berm there along Franklin. 1 assume that we will review that with staff for compliance although you don't have the design review committee, I would hope that you could empower staff to review that and approve that berm. The owner has agreed to that and has agreed to place it in one big swoop rather than piece meal so that is improves the aesthetics of the entire project. Morrow: My question would be is that- typically in these types of subdivisions we have been requiring a business owners association and the maintenance and ownership of those common landscape areas that fall within the management of the business owners association. You are prepared to do that? C~ Meridian City Council June 18, 1996 Page 43 ' • Elg: Yes, I saw that in the P & Z comments also Mr. Mayor and Councilman Morrow, and I believe the owner is agreeable to doing that. Morrow: (Inaudible) landscaping is as per a separate lot. Elg: Oh I see what you are saying, I don't know that we planned on putting it in as a separate lot, I believe we planned on putting it in as an easement but it would be included in the maintenance, the maintenance would be included as part of the homeowners association covenants. Morrow: Very candidly what we have approved most recently in terms of these kinds of projects has been a requirement for that to be a separate lot in terms of the common area landscaping. Elg: Mr. Hon is here, the client and Stan McHuntchinson of our office (inaudible) If it is alright with you I will yield the floor to Becky Bowcutt who was handling this to start with. Becky Bowcutt, 1111 S. Orchard, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Bowcutt: We did discuss the landscaping along Franklin Road, I don't believe the issue of whether it was an easement or separate lot came up in the discussion based on my memory and of course that was 4 or 5 weeks ago. The issue did come up of maintenance and what I stipulated was the policy over the last year has been that it not be done in a piece meal fashion that when the first lot gets ready to go under development at that time the entire stretch of that landscaping that 20 feet will be played in. Therefore complying with that landscape corridor requirement in the ordinance and the comp plan. I don't think we discussed it as a separate lot. Morrow: You are aware that other projects that we have worked on have been required to be separate lots? Bowcutt: Yes, one of them was mine, I had hoped you had forgotten. = Morrow: I know, I have no more questions Mr. Mayor. Rountree: Would you just go into the issue of compatibility of the existing uses in the park with the potential uses particularly in lots I can't see them any more, that adjoin the park. Bowcutt: Right through here? Rountree: Yes, there are probably 6 lots that would be critical. • • Meridian City Council June 18, 1996 Page 44 ' Rountree: Mr. Mayor and Councilman Rountree we had probably a 15 to 20 minute discussion about uses when we went to the Planning and Zoning Commission. There were mixed comments, I believe one individual commented on the fact that obviously the park is an amenity with most types of uses the parks would be a visual amenity that those users would like to take advantage of. Say for example if there was an office of something along that line. However there were a couple members of Planning and Zoning Commission that wanted to address what if the uses were more industrial in nature. Say it was a like a Silver Creek Irrigation Company or something where they had. so called storage yards. What would the impact of the storage yard be on the park and obviously the City's image a lot of people go to that facility and utilize it. There were comments that they would be reviewed, one gentleman indicated why don't we review them use by use if it is a use that some type of storage yard that may be considered unsightly therefore we would require landscape buffering or fencing buffering. However it was say a small office building we would not. Some of the members found some problems with that and I don't think that we could get a real consensus. At one time they wanted us to landscape the whole 20 foot easement that the sewer lies in. After our discussions with the City Engineer he indicated that won't work because of maintenance of that line. You put in a lot of deep rooted trees and we are going to have some severe problems. His thoughts were if there is any landscaping done that we request that it be done within the park obviously at the applicant's expense if that was required. I did go through and count those trees there are approximately 50 trees along this east perimeter and then there are 12 kind of conifer trees along the north portion of the park here. The trees are kind of, they are quite large but what you visually see is the trunk so you can see through the trees even though they provide a buffer when you get about 10 feet up. There is that 8 foot chain link fence and one of the thoughts that I had looking at that today was you could plan some ivy along that fence and it would climb up that chain link fence and create a very nice almost took like a hedge if you had a use. l can't tell you what the uses are going to be, I do know what we have here, there is the Zamzows, there is an office building, I believe a construction company is in there and then there is a day care. So the uses would be whatever is alle,ved under the principle permitted uses of a C-G zone i hate to put in something that is going to block a nice amenity if it is not necessary because their use is compatible. I just, I don't know how to get over that and the Planning and Zoning Commission kept wavering back and forth and I think they kind of left it that well something needs to be done in the event that we do have a user that we don't want to look at from the park's view. Did I answer your question? Rountree: You went around in circles pretty well. Bowcutt: Well I can't tell you what is going to be there, I wish I could. Rountree: Well I can see some conflicting uses and I don't know that there is a solution. • Meridian City Council June 18, 1996 Page 45 - • (Inaudible) Storey Park ball field couid have 60 plus foul balls in any one of those adjoining lots. Bowcutt: I would say it is most likely to happen in this area based on where the back stop is located and then the trees. There is a gap in this corner where there are no trees and the trees begin here and then they begin right in here. Rountree: Those trees don't do a lot of good for foul balls. Bowcutt: They are pretty tall, they will go right over it? Rountree: Oh yes, very high, very fast and very hard. Bowcutt: We kind of joked around at the Planning and Zoning Commission about putting in a gate there so they could get the foul balls. Rountree: I don't know that is necessarily (Inaudible) windshields, (inaudible) spectators that might be there and the other kinds of uses. I don't have a solution, it is an issue. Bowcutt: I guess all I can recommend to my client is they make sure that whomever is purchasing those lots is fully aware of the potential for that type of activity and the foul balls do go over into that area. Rountree: Probably not a real good place for window storage. Corrie: Any further questions? Thank you Becky, any further testimony from the public? Council, comments? Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I don't have any problem with the plat as proposed, I do think we need `~ deal with the issue for the sake of consistency r; requiring the common areas be designated lots and deal with that as an issue. I do think that somewhere within the business owners association or somehow there ought to be some information regarding existing uses and compatibility issues so that at least buyers have a fair chance at understanding that the neighboring uses could have foul balls and window damage and so on and so forth and that is kind of the risk they take in locating there I guess. I would be interested if staff had anything to address and concerns of either one of these issues from Gary or Shari? Stiles: Councilman Morrow, Mayor and Council. The issue is the uses that will be adjacent to the park and what was the other one? • Meridian City Council June 18, 1996 Page 46 • Morrow: The other one was the common lot designation such as we have done on all the other projects that are similar to this. The requirement for a business owners association and a common landscape lot that is owned by that association and maintained by them. Stiles: I would prefer that to be a lot to be consistent with everything else that we have required. As far as the uses that are going to be there any even a permitted use can be required to go through a sites plan review either before the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Council. If you would like to leave it up to staff that if one of those uses comes up that it is automatically sent to you for a site plan review that could be done. Some of the uses that would be offensive I think would require a conditional use permit in that zone it is not an industrial zone it is a general commercial zone. One other issue that hasn't been brought up came up at Planning and Zoning Commission they are proposing 40 foot wide private streets and both the public works department and my department feel that should be a 60 foot right of way that we require for all commercial development. I believe ACHD's new policy is 58 feet. Partly because we don't know the uses and partly we don't know what kind of traffic will be on those streets 40 foot width is significantly less than we have even approved on some of the private residential streets. So I wanted to make sure that you acted on the issue of these private streets and the width of them. What Planning and Zoning had done was just to, their decision was that the width of the streets be negotiated with the City staff. What we would ask is that meet ACHD requirements with curb, gutter and sidewalks and the full 58 foot right of way. I believe Gary has issues on the sewer easement. Smith: Mr. Mayor and Council, I did meet with the applicant's engineer and land planner today. I don't know that we resolved access to the sewer line, we did talk quite a bit about it. My main concern as it has always been is that we maintain access to the manholes, uninhibited access to the manholes. I don't know that the little lots the 20 foot wide lots extending from the culdesacs to a manhole connecting this sewer line is the correct approach. Because you are going to have a 200 foot alley that may not be the right way to handle it. I don't really know at this point w at is the best way to handle it through this __ development. I am not so concerned about the sewer line itself, I think we can access that -_ if need be. It is an interceptor line, it is 18 inches in diameter and we probably won't have = - to access it because it is large enough that most things that are in the sewer will flow on through. But accessing the manholes I want to protect that. I am not sure by this plan and Stan didn't have the information when we met where our existing manholes actually are. They have showed the new manholes somewhere between the south and north boundary of this subdivision and I think there are two manholes that exist out there. So we are going to have to figure out how the City can get to those manholes. I think that, Stan's suggestion as far as accessing the sewer easement was that we make a deed restriction on each lot affected by the sewer line easement. So that the property owner knows by deed that easement is there and that it is a protected easement, restricted to development i • Meridian City Council June 18, 1996 Page 47 on the easement. I don't care about pavement or gravel, I did suggest that any landscaping to be done be placed on the park side of the fence as a way of providing the screening by landscaping and not clouding or occupying the sewer easement. So we haven't resolved the problem of how we get to the manholes, that still needs to be done. We have talked about it. The other thing that we talked about is the pressurized irrigation. Whether or not that would be required in this development and how it would be required or provided. I think those were the main issues that we didn't resolve. Morrow: So that amounts to a total of 6 of 7 issues then that need to be resolved according to my notes. Smith: Well, the width of the culdesacs, the private streets, the access to the sewer manholes along the back property line of those lots, pressurized irrigation, Morrow: Separate lots for common areas, landscaping issue that you talked about, business owners association. Thank you. Smith: The applicant has been trying for several days maybe even a week to get a hold of me to meet with me so we can discuss this and I haven't been very available. I don't' think that there is a problem in working these things out, just however you feel about leaving it in our court to resolve it. Morrow: Well I am comfortable with the staffs capability to resolve these issues but I think that in a public hearing and a public arena that certainly because we have 6 or 7 fairly major issues it is appropriate that the resolution of those be part of a presentation for the public record, it seems like to me. So 1 guess having said that what I would like us to look at at the July 2 meeting take a couple of weeks to get these things resolved and then make the presentation for the resolution of these issues. I don't have a problem with anything else concerning this plat except 1 would like to see those things resolved. And that would mean continuing the public hearing in my mind. Rountree: I agree, I think we need to resolve it, let staff resolve the issues so when we do = -- act on the plat that they are resolved. Corrie: I will entertain a motion to that effect if you so desire. Bentley: So moved Tolsma: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Tolsma to continue the public hearing Meridian City Council June 18, 1996 Page 48 to the July 2 meeting to further comments for staff, any further comments or discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #12: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING ORDINANCE #180, TITLE 3, CHAPTER 15, CAN SYSTEM AND POSSIBLY ENACTING AN ORDINANCE FOR THE CABLE COMMUNICATION FRANCHISE FEE: Corrie: I will open the public hearing at this time. Dan Clark, TCI, 8400 Westpark, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Clark: Good evening, respecting brevity I will simply say that TCI appreciates the cooperation that has taken place up to this point with the Mayor and City Council and staff and TCI. With that I would entertain any questions. Rountree: I have a question related to my wanting clarification of what a surface was (inaudible) previous discussion with TCI and Council. Had you worked that out with TCI? Clark: We have not talked about it I am afraid. Morrow: That was the definition of (inaudible) Rountree: Yes what was meant by surface. Clark I will reassert our agreement to the theme of your concern and I will certainly entertain any language or recommendations. Rountree: I guess for the reco- d if surface would include such things as landscapinc- then would be satisfied. - "~ Clark: (Inaudible) Corrie: Did you get that down Mr. Counselor? Any other questions from Council? Morrow: I guess a point of the follow up of the surface thing that is all inclusive of landscaping and asphalt whatever, concrete, is that the definition of surface? Crookston: I would not imagine that is included in a definition of surface, I think it could be included as what is required. I don't think it is any part of the definition of the surface. ., Meridian City Council July 10, 1996 Page 7 Smith: No it hasn't, but it would have to taken care of as part of the ultimate acceptance of the system by the City of Meridian. Morrow: Which would be prior to final plat signatures? Smith: Not necessarily, the plat could be signed as soon as it is approved but the acceptance of the system wouldn't be done until they were complete. Obviously they won't be able to market any lots without those systems being complete. Well they could sell lots as soon as their plat is recorded, but they can't obtain building permits until certain things are done as far as sewer and water improvements are concerned. Ultimately no occupancy permits are issued until we have accepted sewer and water systems which include the maintenance agreement acceptance of a maintenance agreement. That is perhaps one of the conditions of your approval of the Final plat is that they enter into this maintenance agreement with the City that can be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk. Morrow. I have no further questions. Corrie: Any further comment from staff? Morrow. Mr. Mayor, I would move that we approve the final plat for Packard Subdivision No. 1 subject to all staff, ACHD and Nampa Meridian Irrigation District conditions with further condition that the maintenance agreement be completed by the City, accepted by the City authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest and that the irrigation agreement between the three subdivisions be concluded authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion has been made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree on the final plat for Packard Subdivision, any further discussi~ ,i? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #5: PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED FROM JUNE 18, 1996: REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HONOR PARK NO. 3 SUBDIVISION BY WILLIAM HON: Corrie: At this time I will open the public hearing and invite the representative of Honor Park Subdivision to come forward. Stan McHutchinson, 1111 South Orchard, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. • Meridian City Council July 10, 1996 Page 8 ' McHutchinson: At the June 18 hearing this subject was tabled to give time for staff to meet with the applicant and work out some issues. We have done that, all of the issues and I will let staff speak to some of them but I would like to address some of the issues before Council. Mr. Morrow, you can interrupt me if I left out a condition or a concern that you had at that time. The developer is proposing to build, to provide for 50 foot wide right of way for the streets with a 37 foot pavement back to back with five foot sidewalks on both sides. I, since our last meeting, that is one condition, since our last meeting we have visited the site and identified the trees on the boundary between Storey park and this property and have counted about 50 trees and I have copies of the plan here it shows where the trees are if you must take a look at it. There are about 50 trees and staff have a copy of the preliminary plat. There is a chain link fence, an existing chain link fence that separates the ball field from this property. What we are proposing is to construct the 6 foot chain link fence from the ball field all the way on the south to the south boundary of Story park and as far as additional screening between the park and this property let staff handle that and require that of the individual lot owners when they come before the City with the site plan. The theory being that some of the building sites may not require as extensive of landscaping or that other sites might. And you will know that at the site planning stage. The staff had asked for, the third condition, the staff had asked fora 20 foot landscape buffer along Franklin Road. The developer is proposing that there will be a 20 foot common lot a separate lot constructed along Franklin Road the whole frontage of the property along Franklin. This lot would be developed in its entirety when one of those lots develops. All common lots will be owned by the association and be operated and maintained by the association. There will be an association for this subdivision. Another condition is there was a concem that the people buying lots adjacent to the ball field would be advised that foul balls which are quite often, atf I cart recommend at this time is that this be included in the restrictions to the lots and also noted on the final plat. The object here is to make the future lot owners aware of the situation and that is how we propose to do that. One last condition was how we would physically treat the treatment and provide access to the sewer manholes for the sewer line extension from Honor Park No. 2 all the way out to Franklin Road on the east be~.~ndary of Storey park. We have made aproposal - to staff that I am not sure staff has completely decided what they would like to do in that -- situation. What I would like to do is for Council, if you can act on the preliminary plat -" tonight make it subject to the approval if you see it reasonable., The approval subject to working out this condition with staff as to the treatment of this sewer line and access to the manholes on the Storey park subdivision boundary. That is all the concerns that I remember from that meeting, if there are any more I would be glad to address it and I would address any questions you might have. Corrie: Thank you, questions from Council? Rountree: You indicated that you had identfied the possibility of foul balls and or other • Meridian City Council July 10, 1996 Page 9 activities from the park on the as a deed restriction or one on the final plat. Could you just as well include the subject of having to address buffer requirements with the City staff the way same so that anyone buying those lots would be aware of that situation. McHutchinson: Yes Corrie: Any further question? Morrow: I have one question, with respect to the owners association, you anticipate preparing CC&R's for that to spell out common areas and responsibilities? McHutchinson: Yes Morrow. You also address maybe in the CC&R's the ball issue that we talked about? McHutchinson: CC&R's will be submitted for the attorney's review with the first final plat that is prepared for this property. Tolsma: Question for Gary, Mr. Smith, do you see that there is any problem with that sewer line easement that is on the east side of the ball field (inaudible) what they have laid down here with the gravel surface and everything and the manhole is that going to be a problem with the landscaping between those building lots over there. Smith: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Tolsma, as far as the landscaping is concerned over the sewer easement yes that would be a problem. Our intent on that easement is to restrict any large planting trees so that if we did have to access that line we wouldn't be moving some major landscaping or having to deal with it. Our main concern though. is to access the manholes themselves. That is one of the things that Stan mentioned we still need to work out is how we are going to access those manholes. Whether we can try and access them from a park side which may be the easiest route or access them from #~ ie development side. In terms of access for this line it is very limited because of the diameter --~ of the pipe, it is an 18 inch diameter pipe and you just don't have to access these pipe that ~= - often. Most objects that would plug up smaller pipes of course will flow right on through. And so it is not a big issue as far as number of times to access. But if we ever did have to access we would need to get there in a hurry because there is an awful lot of flow capability in the pipe. That is why we want to maintain, absolutely maintain access to these manholes. Stan and his client have been very cooperative in wanting to provide that type of access. There hasn't been a problem there. We just haven't' been able to nail down the detail as to what that access should look like or the actual construction should look like. In terms of landscaping along the easement, I don't have any problems with grasses, small shrubs those sorts of things but we certainly want to restrict trees. • Meridian City Council July 10, 1996 Page 10 • Tolsma: How close is this sewer line going to be to that row of trees that is through there? Smith: It is probably 15 feet away to the east. Tolsma: (Inaudible) Smith: If we had, 1 think typically on a tree if you are digging within the drip line of the foliage then you are cutting roots that may have an effect on the life of the tree. Most of these trees are poplars and as you know they don't have much of a spread in the foliage so I don't know that their limbs even extend out into the easement right now. Tolsma: (Inaudible) culdesac (inaudible) Smith: We are a couple hundred feet from the culdesac to the property line. That is one of the issues, when we first started this was to provide an access from the end of the culdesac to the west to the property line. But in effect what we would be creating would be a long 200 foot by 20 foot wide alley that was basically a dead end. Neither myself nor the applicant nor Stan felt that was a really good solution. So that is why we really have decided on what we want to do. Perhaps simply an easement for the sewer line on one lot or the other is the best procedure. We would have a manhole in the public right of way, the culdesac and a manhole at the property line. Could access both of those and then the sewer line would be in an easement if we needed to get to that sewer line we would still have the easement and access from the culdesac. Tolsma: You don't have a problem (inaudible) Smith: Yes I do Corrie: Any other questions or comments from Council? Thank you sir, anybody else from the public that would li!~;e to enter testimony on this public hearing? Staff a~~y further comments that you need to make before I close the public hearing? At this point then I will close the public hearing. Morrow. Mr. Mayor, I would move that we approve the preliminary plat for Honor Park Subdivision No. 3 by William Hon subject to all staff conditions and the special condition of the resolution of the sewer line access to be worked out between our engineer staff, City Attorney, Mr. Hon and Mr. McHutchinson his representative. Bentley: Second Corrie: Motion by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Bentley, that the preliminary plat for Honor v Meridian City Council July 10, 1996 Page 11 " Park Subdivision No. 3 by approved with the conditions set forth by the motion, discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would like to tell Mr. McHutchinson that he and Mr. Hon did a very nice job of answering questions, they were direct and to the point and got the resolutions of the issues that we as a City need so thanks for doing a nice job. ITEM #6: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A SENIOR CITIZEN BOARDING, LODGING COMPLEX BY WAYNE & KAREN FORREY CONTINUED FROM JUNE 18, 1996: Corrie; Mr. Forrey you or your representative. Phillips: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council I am Robert Phillips, my business address is 277 North 6th Street Boise, Idaho. I represent Mr. Forrey. First thing I would like to go over is there are two findings of fact and conclusions of law and as we left it last time it seemed like there were not a lot of concerns about the granting of conditional use permit and I have some analysis as to why you should choose one to the other which 1 will dispense with unless there are concerns with granting this conditional use permit. Rountree: I have specific concerns about granting the conditional use permit. As it relates to rezoning it industrial property of which we have little of in the City of Meridian which is difficult to zone for. Phillips: Let me address then, what we are asking here for is a planned development which is under the policy set forth in the ordinances, the policy of the City is to encourage planned development. Specifically in industrial areas planned development general is a permitted use as I~,ng as you get a conditional use permit. If you look at the findings of fact and conclusions of law the big issue is whether or not this is a planned development general or a planned development residential. That is the choice that needs to be-made -`_ tonight between the two different findings of fact. Define that it is residential first of all you have to use the wrong chart in my opinion, you have to use 2-409A, secondly you have to find that there is not a mixed use and I think as we discussed at the last Council meeting there is a mixed use. Third, you have to find that the predominance use is a residential use. That is not defined in the code, residential use is not in the City ordinances. You have to find that as a predominant use. And lastly, even that included you have to find that the accessories to that residential use which is not defined would include the educational facility the chapels and the other commercial uses that we have. And also given the fact that there has been in the past consistently the Council has found that certain areas that • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: July 2.1996 APPLICANT: WILLIAM HON ITEM NUMBER; 5 REQUEST:PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HONOR PARK NO.3 SUBD. AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS 6 ~5 ~~ ~~' OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. JUN-26-1996 11 52 FROM MERIDIRN CITY P.01 TO • EPIC~NEERIIYG ~3RICGS G~~~~~~iIBL~~ ~G~~l~M9B~(u ~ TO G~'~1 ~~~ FROM "~ ""^` COMPANY ~~~'~'^ BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. FAX N0. ~~ DATE 6-2.?•t6 N0. OF PAGES SENT (Including Transmittal) REFERENCE REMARKS ~3 1111 S. ORCHARD, SUITE 600 x BOISE, 1D. 83705 FAX N0.(208)346-2950 TELE N0.(208)344-9700 8EI PROJECT N0. ~<j/00 ~" REPLY REQUESTED COPY 1111 S. ORCHARD, SUITE 600 * BOISE, IDAHO 83705 * (208) 344-9700 FAX NO (208) 345-2950 JUN 26 '96 11 55 PAGE.01 JUN-26-1996 11 52 FROM TO f1ERIDIRN • ~ ~~ June 26, 1996 Mr. Gary Smith, P.E. City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Honor Park No. 3 Subdivision Dear Gary: Pursuant to the cily councils request, this letter is meant to address the concerns that the council expressed in the meeting on June 18, 1996. 1. Private road widths - 50' private right-of--way with 37' pavement, back to back, and 5' sidewalks on both sides and a 50' radius cul-de-sac. This would be consistent with Meridian Zoning Ordinance Section 9-605(3)a (Minor Street 50 feet. 2. The sewer lines from the private streets to the sewer line paralleling Storey Park will be on separate lots, and shall be 20' wide with a 16' gravel surface. This lot will be widened where it ties into the existing 20' sewer easement to facilitate city access from the common lot to the easement. See enclosed sketch. Access to existing manholes will be addressed through deed restrictions. 3. Each existing and new manhole in the sewer easement will have 20' x 20' gravel surface constructed around the manhole access. 4. There are existing trees along the eastern boundary with Storey Park that are over 20 feet high and spaced 15 or 20 feet apart. We propose that each lot that borders on Storey Park be required to have a site plan approved by city staff with regards to landscaping between the lot in question and Storey Park. For instance, if the type of use for the lot is such that screening is required between the lot and Storey Park, that lot owner will be required to install additional landscaping/screening. The form and location of any landscapinglscreening can be determined by staff. 951004\smith.ltr JUN 26 '96 11 56 PAGE.02 JUN-26-1996 11~5Z FROM • • 5. We don't yet know if irrigation water can be delivered to this property. However, the developer will comply with the current ordinance regarding pressurized irrigation. 6. The developer will create a 20' wide common lot for the landscaping adjacent to the Franklin Road right-of--way for ownership and maintenance by the subdivision association. Development of this lot will occur in one phase when any one of the lots fronting Franklin Road develops. 7. The DeveloperlCity agrees to provide a disclosure statement on all deeds of property adjacent to the ball field advising potential buyers of the likelihood of foul balls. A note will also be added to the final plat. 8. All common lots shall be owned by a subdivision association. In order for city council to be certain that these items have been agreed to by both staff and the developer, 1 recommend that you, Shari Stiles, and Bill Hon sign this letter. If you or Shari feels that some items need further discussion, please call before Tuesday's council meeting. Sincerely, BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. Stan McHutchison, P.E. cc: Shari Stiles Bill Hon Agreed to by: Bill Hon Gary Smith Shari Stiles 9510041smith.ltr TOTAL P.03 JUN 26 '96 11 56 PAGE.03 • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: JUNE 18 1996 APPLICANT: WILLIAM HON ITEM NUMBER; 11 REQUEST•PUBLIC HEARING• REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HONOR PARK N0.3 AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: COMMENTS 5-14-96 P ~ Z MINUTES SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS "REVIEWED" SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ~ I'~/' SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS r" I U" V~'` OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 5 conditions set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law. Hepper: Second Johnson: We have a motion and a second to send a recommendation onto City Council as stated, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #5: TABLED APRIL 9, 1996: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VACATION OF A PORTION OF GEM STREET RIGHT OF WAY BY WILD SHAMROCK PARTNERSHIP: Johnson: We have a request from the applicant that we deal with this as late as we can on the agenda because of a priori appointment. I have agreed to that so we will skip from item 5 and go to Item 6. Do we need a motion to change that on the agenda or not? Crookston: Yes Johnson: I would entertain a motion to consider this later in the meeting. Shearer: I so move Oslund: Second Johnson: It has been moved and seconded that we address item 5 later in the meeting to accommodate the applicant, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #6: PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED FROM APRIL 9, 1996: REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HONOR PARK N0. 3 SUBDIVISION BY WILLIAM HON: Johnson: This is a continued public hearing we will be taking testimony and applicant's and people testifying need to be sworn. I will now open this public hearing again and continue it. Is the applicant or representative here that would like to address the Commission at this time? Becky Bowcutt, Briggs Engineering, 1111 South Orchard, was sworn by the City Attorney. Bowcutt: We appreciate the Commission deferring this item from the last agenda. Our • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 6 client was out of town and we needed his guidance to address some of the comments made by staff. This is a continuation of the Honor Park development or I-84 Business Park as some people call it. This is Meridian Speedway; the first two phases that we platted along Watertower Lane are right here. Then this is what we are asking for approval on this L-shaped piece, this is Franklin and this is Stratford Drive. Originally we requested 19 lots, these are commercial lots, it is a C-G zone. It is on 21.64 acres. After we met with the Highway District they allowed us three approaches onto Franklin Road for these lots. We needed to have shared approaches and we needed some alignment with 3rd and we needed to stay west of 5th or align with 5th but no closer to -this intersection. So we have since reduced the seven lots we had fronting on Franklin to five and just enlarged them. Made for a little bit better lots because of the shared approaches. This particular lot here is the only lot that will be allowed to take access on Stratford Drive. These lots are intended to take access internally. What we are proposing is a, this is a lot in itself, it is 40 feet wide and then we have modified this fora 50 foot radius and these we are proposing to be private. The reason being is Mr. Hon has indicated that he doesn't know who his users will be, they may end up wanting a larger portion other than say just a one lot user, maybe they want 3 lots therefore that would function more as a driveway into a commercial facility versus like a public street. They are quite short, they are only about, I think they come in about 400 approximately 400 feet or a little bit less than that. We have reviewed staff's comments, Stan McHutchinson addressed the comments and made the changes and that was sent back this week. I think that is about it, we have sewer and water available, we stubbed to these lots on Stratford because there are no cuts allowed on Stratford Drive. We have an existing sewer main running along the rear here. Staff has asked that these sewer lines be put in separate lots. In Mr. McHutchinson's letter he has indicated that we will comply with those but the owner Mr. Hon did disagree in putting the existing line in a separate lot since it runs down the far perimeter and it wasn't in a lot originally it has been in an easement for a period of time. Do you have any questions, that is about it, pretty straight forward commercial plat. Johnson: Questions of Ms. Bowcutt? Hepper: Is there going to be some landscaping along any of the streets? Bowcutt: Yes, staff indicated they want a 20 foot landscaping area along all of the lots on Franklin Road because it is one of the view corridors. We do show the 20 foot landscape easement along the front, I talked to Mr. Hon based on the Planning and Zoning Commissions past concerns about landscaping and doing it in a piece meal fashion i told him it would be imperative in his covenants to set forth standards and that they maintain that landscaped area. I also indicated that the Planning and Zoning Commission in the past has not looked favorable on each lot doing their landscaping as it goes in but on the fact that when the first lot goes in then the developer has a responsibility of putting in all • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 7 that landscaping in. So we have one continuous landscaped area. Hepper: So is that what you propose to do? Bowcutt: Yes, that is what he indicated we would be acceptable. Hepper: Who would be responsible for the maintenance? Bowcutt: In the easement each land owner would be responsible for the maintenance unless this body thinks otherwise. MacCoy: Becky, one of the things that I recall (inaudible) since it backs up to Storey Park 1 thought we asked for a buffer or a fence along that division line in there. Bowcutt: I think Ms. Stiles' comment was that there should be a fence along there in that perimeter. I think her, on item 13 she said temporary perimeter fencing should be provided prior to obtaining building permits to contain construction debris. You are talking about a permanent fence, I don't think anybody has addressed that. MacCoy: I think one of our concerns was that since it was backing up to Storey Park which is a park that the City uses (inaudible) should be a division there between industrial type buildings and that of a park system. Bowcutt: I agree with you. MacCoy: Shari where did that go to? Stiles: Commission MacCoy, Commissioners, Storey Park already had a chain link fence the length of that property. MacCoy: That is a six foot high fence? Johnson: It is actually in excess of that. MacCoy: What do you think of that Gary as being the only fence we have between an industrial unit? Smith: Commissioners, I guess my concern is primarily in that northeast comer of Storey park where the baseball diamond is located. I know for a fact there are a lot of fowl balls hit out of the fenced area of Storey Park into the Hon property. Right now they just hop the fence and go get them. But we talked about at one time some way to access that area for Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 8 that reason. I don't know if that is feasible or not. MacCoy: I wouldn't think so with having the thing owned by industrial people their own control that we could ask people to go look for fowl balls in their backyards. I would like to see some type of, I guess what I am asking you to do Becky is take it back and ask them about a division line between their building complex and the park system. Bowcutt: What would you recommend for some type of buffer? Do you have something in mind? MacCoy: Generally, no I don't really. Bowcutt: Are you looking for something sight obscuring like a sight obscuring fence or a berm. MacCoy: If you have a sight obscuring fence I think that would be up to your owners, they may want that for their own reasons not to have a park living in their backyard or their lessees or owners in that area. So I think it kid of falls back into your court in one sense. I have raised the question that it would be beneficial to your clients that you have such a barricade or a break line or something like that from the park, the kids somewhat. Bowcutt: I will take that recommendation back to my client. Shearer: If there is a six foot chain link fence there they can put slats in it if you want to obscure it. Smith: Mr. Chairman, Commissioners, I think I have mislead you a little bit on that fence. I think the fence that I am thinking of is the fence along the baseball diamond. There is a fence am I not right Mr. Chairman? Johnson: No, there is a fence on the dividing line on the property tine. Smith: Because when you are chasing the fowl balls they just crawl through a farm fence to go from the park into the farm field. Johnson: Not any more, it is chained and the gate is closed most of the time. They open it when they go in after the balls is all. It is a substantial fence, it is a second hand fence is the problem that it was moved from another location so it is not in the greatest state of repair. It is close to the back stop and significant number of fowl balls go back there every ball game I have been at, hundreds of them. The only way I can see to eliminate that would be construction of some huge netting or something. It would have to be 50 feet tall Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 9 almost to stop the fowl balls. And I am sure Mr. Hon is aware of that, he has had the property for a long time. Anybody buying that property is going to be realizing that they are going to be next to a lighted field that plays at night with a lot of kids and that is just the proximity of the thing. That is the way it works out. MacCoy: I was thinking more of the visual type of thing from the standpoint of your client. Bowcutt: Well on one hand the park is kind of a pretty little amenity to have next door. The clients I guess if I was~putting some type of an office building or something I would like to be able to view the park. (Inaudible) Bowcutt: If I could address the fowl balls, since we are putting these sewer lines in a separate lot that can't be fenced or obstructed therefore Gary couldn't we create a corridor for them to come back and get the balls? Smith: Well, the fowl balls in the lots I would expect those lots will be fenced and once you get, you could of course access the street from that sewer corridor but getting access into the backs of those lots is where the baseballs will be located. Bowcutt: If they had a secured area. Smith: If they were fenced off and locked off then the balls would be lost to the property owners. Bowcutt: Maybe we should put a note on the plat that each lot owner will return all fowl balls (inaudible). Johnson: I think that Malcolm's point is he wants everybody to be aware of the fact that the park is there,. it is operational it has been for a long time and only operates for a few months a year. They start baseball in March and they virtually end it the first of August. Bowcutt: I will stress that to Mr. Hon and indicate that whoever looks at that these lots to make sure they are fully aware of the ball field and the ramifications that go with being next to it. MacCoy: I am glad you made the change in your lots along Franklin that was a concern of mine. I was hoping that ACRD and your client would come to an agreement on that because I thought there was going to be a problem. We noted that at the time. So I commend you for that one. • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 10 Oslund: I have a question, I am not familiar with the property on this east side, and where is what is the limit of the developed park, does it go all the way out to your property line? Bowcutt: This is the park right here (inaudible) Oslund: And you are proposing general commercial? Bowcutt: It is zoned C-G currently and we are platting it. Oslund: I guess my concern, what I, I just don't see much of a compatibility between the park, I guess I would like to see something more than a fence. Johnson: If I can interrupt, part of this is already development and we (inaudible). The southerly side, what Mr. Hon is doing is developing the westerly side (inaudible) finishes his property. Oslund: And we didn't require anything of the applicant in terms of say a berm or landscaping between his development and the park? Bowcutt: Right here, no not to my knowledge. Johnson: Nothing, there is nothing there. Oslund: Are those, the lots on the south have they been developed? Bowcutt: Some of them and all the roads and all the utilities are in and he put Stratford in here too. Johnson: (Inaudible) the lot that is utilized right now temporarily for speedway parking which is directly across from the visitors center are you familiar with that. And then (inaudible) new buildings in there now that are partially rented or leased and a couple of lots are still for sale there. Hepper: I have somewhat the same concerns as Greg and Malcolm if it was limited office space the back of those buildings would just be maybe just a building with some windows. But where it is C-G commercial there could be storage yards in the back, if there was for example a plumbing shop and they have a storage yard in the back where they keep their supplies. Johnson: I think that is a strong likelihood that is the type of tenant they will get there. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 11 Hepper: Not so much from the tenants looking out on the park but from the people in the park looking back the other way they are going to be looking at a bunch of storage yards potentially. There is nothing wrong with storage yards, but I think we need to have a screened in fence rather than a chain link fence something to screen off those storage yards and I believe that is part of the city ordinance too if there are storage yards Bowcutt: With that type of an intensive use yes t would recommend it be screened. Hepper: I don't know if that is a City ordinance if all storage yards need to have a screened in fence if we need to make that a condition of this or if that would only have to apply in these cases where they would be a storage yard. (Inaudible) Hepper: There may only be one or two across there or there may be several of them, it would be hard to know at this point if there are going to be any or not. If it was the back of a building with maybe just some windows and landscaping there chain link fence would be fine but if was a storage yard or a vehicle storage lot or something else of that nature then I think a screened fence. Shearer: A lot of those have to have a conditional use to go in there don't they? Bowcutt: Some are principle permitted uses that could go in without going through a review. I would probably recommend. that you add a condition that it be addressed the differences in the uses as far as the more intensive uses should provide some obscuring fencing. MacCoy: Igo back to the fact that your client may find that very good to have that (Inaudible) Oslund: That concern, we don't have any parks anyway, we only have this park that is it. As hard as we try to get other parks maybe that will happen and maybe it won't. I tell you if we allow a development to come in and at this point it is basically going to surround our single park on three sides it seems to me it should be attractive and there should be some screening. The last thing I would like to see is a park surrounded by commercial tilt ups 30 feet high and you (inaudible) So I don't know if I like the idea of kind of piece mealing it either depending on what kind of development it is. It would be nice to see some kind of consistency throughout. Even if we missed the south side, that is a small portion, what we are considering here is three times longer what has already been approved as a perimeter around the park. • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 12 MacCoy: I agree with you Greg because I have driven up into that site and actually walked that site and the lower section down here is not a problem but you can see in the upper section there it will be a problem there. I don't want to see it piece meal, if they are going to do it do the whole thing. I think it would look tacky to do it piece meal. Hepper: If we do require a fence are we looking at a 6 foot cedar fence? Shearer: We have already got a chain link fence there. It would be a lot easier to just slat the fences there and fake care of both problems at once ra#her than having two different kinds offences. Hepper: I am not really crazy about a six foot cedar fence over a period of time they bleach out and the boards warp and twist and they break. Within several years you are going to have a real expensive eyesore along the park there instead of something that is going fo be maintained. MacCoy: It is easier to maintain than one of these with the chain link and the slats in it then it is the board. Hepper: And maybe the vinyl slats rather than the cedar slats. Something like that would maybe be more appropriate. Oslund: Can't we consider landscaping? Just keep the chain link fence where it is at, but provide some landscaping buffer on this development side. We have a 20 foot sanitary easement already, if we made that a little wider and not, provide so that there is still room for the easement to get access to maintain that sanitary sewer but provide enough room in there also for plants and trees for instance. Bowcutt: We would have to be careful about the times of varieties we plant with the sewer line being in there. Oslund: But if we move the sanitary lines over closer to one edge of the easement they have a 20 foot easement. MacCoy: It is already in. Oslund: Well then describe the easement in such a way that you have enough room to put in some landscaping. Just saying that there are many ways to do it. You have a line out there establish your line put your 20 foot easement or 30 foot easement on it and use that as a common easement of landscaping and a sanitary easement. It is not often that you have to maintain a sanitary line or dig it up. But the plantings could be in such a way that • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 13 if it was needed to be dug up it wouldn't destroy the landscaping. As far as I am concerned the fence wouldn't be that big of a deal a six foot fence is not going to screen that much anyway. Johnson: That fence is 8 foot tall, because we put 7 foot 7 inch panels on it and it didn't reach to the ground. Shearer: I think it would be adequate if we require them to screen storage yards etc. and not ever, not the entire thing. they would have a storage yard and screen it and I would think they would want to keep the rest of their project attractive or a commercial use. MacCoy: Then you have a checker board. affair. Shearer: Well you are talking if you have an eight foot fence along there or seven or whatever it is that could be slatted or they could put their storage yards out to the side and fence them and screen them with landscaping. MacCoy: And then looking down the road if you get a client today and he doesn't need the slatting and they don't slat it he'll lose out a few months from now or maybe years from now. Shearer: That would be part of the, could be made part of the plat when they buy the property to be committed to that. MacCoy: Well the reason I give it back to Becky to give back to the client. Johnson: I would like to hear a couple of comments from staff regarding the road system designed and also those 50 foot wide culdesacs, do you have a comment regarding that Shari? It is different then what was proposed initially. Stiles: Chairman Johnson and Commissioners they have revised the plat so it shows a 50 foot radius on the culdesac, they have left the drive way itself 40 feet. Staff s concern was this would not be wide enough particularly because we don't know what the uses will be. 40 foot is less than has even been approved on private residential drive ways. I guess that will be up to the commissioners and could whether they will allow these to be private streets. I wouldn't have any problem with them being private streets but I would like to see them developed to an ACHD standard. When they have to record these as public streets and they they later want to go in and reconfigure the lots it makes it very difficult for them, it is very time consuming to go through the City and Ada County Highway District and then vacate those streets. So I can understand that reasoning but I think it should be to a commercial standard. • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 14 MacCoy: What is our requirement for fire trucks? We don't have one? Bowcutt: A 50 foot radius is what they have always indicated to me. MacCoy: Yes that is true for the 50 foot but I was thinking for the length of the street? Bowcutt: Uniform Fire Code requires a travel surface minimum of 20 feet. That is when they are talking drive ways. MacCoy: I was wondering what we require the City. Smith: Commissioner, I am not sure in the commercial zone, it seems like we have had 60 foot right of ways in our commercial subdivisions, industrial subdivisions. I believe the last phase of Winston Moore's project on the north side of Franklin Road basically across the street from this one they had 50 foot right of ways plus a five foot road easement on each side of the first phase. On the second phase they I believe went to a 50 foot wide street. I don't recall a diameter on the culdesac. I feel that this 40 foot width for a commercial subdivision is with the addition according to the letter from Stan McHutchinson of the no parking signs along the sides of the street. That is a problem in my mind because we still have an enforcement issue to deal with. It is a private street, who enforces it, I don't know that the City police are in the position to enforce that. If they don't who is going to. So I think there is a problem with the 40 foot private street in the commercial subdivision. I have another comment that I would like to make concerning this sewer easement. First of all 1 want to make it a matter of record. that I appreciate in the past dealir~ with the Hon brothers. They have always been receptive to granting easements for the City of Meridian for extension of sewer and water line across their property. We have appreciated that in the past and I wanted everyone to know that we have appreciated it. The second issue though that I have right now with sewer lines in easements is their accessibility. Even though as Commissioner Oslund mentioned you don't have to very often get into a sewer line. This sewer line serves a large area. It serves all of Meridian Greens, it serves all of Sportsman Pointe, it serves Salmon Rapids, Los Alamitos, the Playground, it is a big service area. I don't want to put our maintenance people in a position of having to cut gates, cut chains, whatever it takes to get to a sewer line that needs maintenance. As it exists right now it is fairly accessible because nothing is there except an open field. When we have got lot lines every 250 feet then we have a fence to deal with. I would like to have the applicant or their engineering people devise some way that will guarantee the City maintenance people access to that line at any time for maintenance purposes. I have been a stickler on it on other subdivisions on residential subdivisions in particular because the lots are a lot smaller in those cases. Right now I am dealing with a situation in a residential subdivision where the developer neglected to constnact an access way that was supposed to be constructed. The people that bought the lots are faced with a situation Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 15 that they didn't know anything about and now we have an easement that is not fenced off as it was supposed to be and we are going to be faced with people on those lots making improvements that we don't have any control over. Although there will be some because the easement language is being written to allow us some control. But it just becomes more of a headache to maintain the line when you have to deal with 6 or 7 property owners along here as opposed to having access and perhaps what we need to do is move the fence over so the sewer line is in the park I don't know. But, I would really like to see something proposed negotiated, whatever the word is so we have access to that sewer line. I guess that is all I have to say. Johnson: Okay Gary thank you, any questions for staff before we move on? Any further questions for Becky? Does Becky have any further comments at this time, or would you like to reserve those in the event that there is other testimony? Bowcutt: I don't have any further questions. Johnson: Okay, this is a public hearing is there anyone else that would like to address the Commission on this application at this time? Seeing no one then I will close the public hearing. (End of Tape) Okay, you have heard the testimony, what is your recommendation, Commissioners, what would you like to do? Certainly you would like to do something right? Hepper: Something, we just don't know how to put it. Johnson: Who wants to take a stab at it? Hepper: Well we are wondering if we should table this until Becky has a chance to confer with her client about some possible alternatives or if she would want us to give her some altematives or choose one and see if she can live with it. I am not really sure the best way to handle this. Johnson: It is really up to you, I personally didn't .have an opportunity to review her memo that was submitted today because it came in so -late. Shearer: I move we approve the preliminary plat with the requirements of screening for storage areas included in the covenants and that the owner work out an agreeable agreement with the City Engineer on sewer access. MacCoy: Second Johnson: We have a motion by Commissioner Shearer and second by Malcolm MacCoy Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 . Page 16 all those in favor? Opposed? • MOTION FAILED: 2 Yea, 2 Nay, Chairman breaks tie -Nay Johnson: Is there another motion? Oslund: I move that we recommend to the City Council, or that we approve the preliminary plat with the following addition that being including a landscaped easement between the development and Storey park for the~entire perimeter of the application. Johnson: Motion dies for lack of a second. Is mere another motion that someone would like to make. Is there any further discussion at this point. I didn't have a whole lot of problem with the first motion with the exception that the streets weren't addressed and that seemed to be a concern of staff. Shearer: Fifty foot easement rather than a 40? Johnson: Well I think some things need to be worked out with staff, I don't care how you phrase it, you can phase it however you want. Hepper: I move that we recommend approval to the City Council with the stipulation that a landscape buffer fora 8 foot fence be constructed along the perimeter north of the westside of the City park, that property line ac~oining those two sides of the City park, the east side of the City park. Also that access to the sewer be negotiated with the applicant to the staffs satisfaction and also that the width of the streets be negotiated with the City staff. MacCoy: Second Johnson: We have a motion and a second, any other discussion regarding the motion? Shearer: I think we are developing a lot of fences that is going to be hard to do anything with. Johnson: Any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: 3 Yea, 1 Nay ITEM #7: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A CHILD CARE CENTER BY JERRY COBLER: WILLIAM G. BF_RG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATNA. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney MEMORANDUM: ~ COUNCIL MEMBERS HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live WALT W. MORROW, President CITY OF MERIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA E C GLENN R. BENTLEY 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 P & Z COMMISSION Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 TIM HEPPER Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND ROBERT D. CORRIE MALCOLM MACCOY Mayor April 3, 1996 To: Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning From: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City En ' eer ~~~~ Shari Stiles, P&Z Administrator CT Re: HONOR PARK #3 SUBDIVISION (Preliminary Plat - By William A. Hon) We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, for your information and consideration as conditions of the Applicant during the hearing process: GENERAL COM_M_ENTS 1. Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project, shall be tiled per City Ordinance 11-9-605.M. The ditches to be piped are to be shown on the Preliminary Plat. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 5-7-517. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Determine the seasonal high groundwater elevation, and submit a profile of the subsurface soil conditions as prepared by a soil scientist with the development plans. 4. Provide 5-foot-wide sidewalks on both sides of proposed streets in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-9-606.B. 5. Water service to this development is contingent upon positive results from a hydraulic analysis by our computer model. c:~ormce~wrwn~arnnocs~xoxxrtL3.rr ~ • Mayor, Council and P&Z Apri13, 199b Page 2 6. Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, and road base to be approved by the Ada County Highway District prior to any building permits being issued. 7. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian's Water Works Superintendent. Fire hydrant locations shall be depicted on the preliminary plat map. 8. Indicate any existing FEMA Floodplain Boundaries on the Preliminary Plat Map, and/or any plans to reduce said boundaries. 9. Submit a master street drainage plan, including the method of disposal & approval from the affected irrigation/drainage district. 10. Respond in writing, to each of the comments contained in this memorandum, and submit to the City Clerk's Office prior to the scheduled hearing. SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS 1. Sanitary sewer service for these lots shall be off of the existing sanitary sewer main shown on the plat. Subdivision designer shall field-verify the location of the existing sewer main. The field-verified location needs to be shown on the revised preliminary plat map. The treatment capacity of the Meridian Wastewater Treatment Plant is currently being evaluated. Approval of this application needs to be contingent upon our ability to accept the additional sanitary sewage generated by this proposed development. The subdivision designer is to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Meridian Public Works Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of roadway centerlines. 2. Water service to this site could be via an extension of the existing 12" water main in Stratford Drive. The subdivision designer is to coordinate routing with the Meridian Public Works Department. Water lines shall be located on the north and east sides of roadway centerlines. The developer is to coordinate the abandonment of the existing 12" water main along the northerly boundary of Honor Park Subdivision No. 2 with the Meridian Water Department. 3. The private roads proposed need to be changed to dedicated 60' roadway rights-of--way. While private roadways have sometimes been approved in connection with planned residential developments, we do not believe it is appropriate for this commercial c: ~o~cc~~wrwn~nwenocs~xox~c3. rr Mayor, Council and P&Z April 3, 1996 Page 3 development. All streets within this subdivision shall have a minimum right-of--way width of 60' per Meridian City Ordinance and be constructed with curb, gutter and sidewalk. 4. The Meridian Comprehensive Plan designates this portion of Franklin Road as a Principal Arterial. The required right-of--way on Franklin Road shall be a minimum of 45' from centerline. 5. Franklin Road is designated as an entrance corridor in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. The City, as a condition of preliminary plat approval, should require that a common landscape lot, a minimum of 20' beyond required right-of-way, be included in the plat for ownership and maintenance by the subdivision association. 6. Revise the Preliminary Plat to include all proposed and existing utilities including pressurized irrigation, with proposed source, streetlights, fire hydrants, and addressing all other comments contained herein. Resubmit the Preliminary Plat with all revisions. 7. Submit a master street grading and drainage plan including method of disposal & approval from the affected irrigation/drainage district. 8. Provide 250-watt high pressure sodium streetlights at locations designated by the Meridian Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 9. Provide statements of dedications to the public and/or easements, together with a statement of location, dimension and purpose of such. Nine Mile Creek affects Lot 30 of Block 2, and the easement must be shown on the plat. 10. The proposed 20' sewer easements shall be designated as separate lots per Meridian City policy. One option the developer may consider for the sewer easement adjacent to Storey Park is deeding the easement to the City for inclusion in the park. 11. Revise the preliminary plat to show the existing 20' sewer easement crossing Lot 27, Block 2, as a common lot. Adjust lots as needed to accommodate this sewer lot. 12. Any proposal for a supplementary connection from the City's water system to the pressurized irrigation system will need to be reviewed closely due to the size of the area to be watered. Applicant shall provide a statement as to the ownership of and operation and maintenance for the pressurized irrigation system. C: \OPFICH\ W PW I!V\ W PDOCS\HONRPK3. PP • Mayor, Council and P&Z April 3, 1996 Page 4 13. Temporary perimeter fencing is to be provided prior to obtaining building permits to contain construction debris. 14. Foul balls into this property have been common occurrences. The Parks Director also indicates that the noise level from games should be considered in development of these lots, as well as ensuring that overhead lighting will not interfere with ball players. The City may wish to consider some form of netting to intercept stray balls. The City should also consider possible acquisition of a portion of this property for needed parking. 15. Lots fronting on Franklin Road will be required to share accesses. Individual lots will not be eligible for separate accesses. c:~bFmce~wPwunwpnocs~xoxxrxs.rr WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., Clty Clerk JANICE L. LASS, Clty Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV SupeMsor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney HUB ~ OF TREASURE VALLEY couNCl M MBERS A Good Place to Live WALT W. MORROW, President CITY OF MERIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA EE C GLENN R. BENTLEY 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 P 8 Z COMMISSION Phone (208) 888-4433 • FA.X (208) 887-4813 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-?211 TIM HEPPER Motor Vehicle/Driven; License (208) 888-4443 JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND ROBERT D. CORRIE MALCOIM MACCOY Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS Old DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your coml>lrents and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: April 2 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/18/96 HEARING DATE: 4/ 2/96 REQUEST: Preliminary Plat for Honor Park No 3 Subdivision BY: William Hon LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: South of Franklin Road, West of Stratford Drive JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) JIM SHEARER, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT GREG OSLUND, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH BOB CORRIE, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) WALT MORROW, C/C U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FNVAL PLAT) -GLENN BENTLEY, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRE IM & FINAL PLAT) WATER DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF RECLAMATI ELIM INAL PLAT) SEWER DEPARTMENT CITY FILES BUILDING DEPARTMENT OTHER: FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMAR CITY ATTORNEY -Z CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MAR 1 9 1996 CITY OF MERIDUN ~,, ~ Ol~FICIALS WILLIAM G. BF_RG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, Clty Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATNA. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney HUB . OF TREASURE VALLEY GOUNGIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live WALT W. MORROW, President CITY OF MERIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA EYEE O GLENN R. BENTL 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 P & Z COMMISSION Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) >~7-4813 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Public Worfss/Building Department (206J 887-2211 TIM HEPPER Motor VehiclelDrivers License (208) EB8-4443 JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND ROBERT D. CORRIE MALCOLM MACCOY Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning 8< Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: Affil 2. 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/18/96 HEARING DATE: 4/ 2/96 REQUEST: Preliminary Plat for Honor Park No 3 Subdivision BY: William Hon LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: South of Franklin Road. West of Stratford Drive JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MALCOLM MACCOY, P!Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) JIM SHEARER, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT GREG OSLUND, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH BOB CORRIE, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) WALT MORROW, C/C U.S. WEST(PRELIii4 & FINAL PLAT) -GLENN BENTLEY, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) -WATER DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELINf$ FINAL PLAT) -SEWER DEPARTMENT CITY FILES ~/ ~ ~ ` ~~ BUILDING DEPARTMENT OTHER: FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS. POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY ~ ~/p' TicrK.~_~+12ou.i,~ ry,.e,a s ~ CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER S' o r ~~~ ' iQ- L1 C6 ,!" s l,JiLL /U~ ~~ 8.~e. /Yl ~ / U ~.n•v s ~4h~a l.Ja-f-~r N ~' ~h-1- - ~ it ~u U F: kE 5nn: v ~/~ s ~ ~a its . ~~ ~ ~/- fiG t ~e pXrA~~ ~ R- .Ci ~ E F/ate R~e {__`. ~ 4 `+! ~ (`~ (Jt,..l ~ E jw'l erU ~ ~.O r (.~.~ a ~ ccr . ,~ ° r ''~ ~ r r ; = e~ 8g + ~ c ~~ ~ '~ ~ w u ~ ~ ~ t ~y; ~ '~ e a. E ~ E~ ~o „ ~~ ~^ a A y H ~ `~u N ~ ~ d ~ C "d r ~ y •' ' o E 3 .5 .Eo 3 ~~~ ~ 3a~ ~$~, ~~~ Fj '~ A ~ 9 O ~~ C ~e3 E a = c 9 8. ~ W ° ~L '~ p o r ° < ~' V Q rl ~ _ :Q C ~$ ~ .fl Vl ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~L ~ 5 ~~ ~ .. z • ~ Q < sy ; L ~ m~~~ r N h 'C Q z ~~~ ~, a ~~a• • ~~ go o8e~ V r O o 0 ~qQ ~ O ogo ~go~pQpQ+ O8O~~pQ+opQ~ ~ ~ ~ fVNN _ ? e+i fn l+f 7 r rl~m ~G ~O ~G OO7 Vr1~/1 V111'1 ¢_ x ^'0~o88~g O~OO~D 0 ~000^~y ~~ r1 N1 N1~0O~07Cw1O N SO~dh Q~~ O. . X Ni^ooO . N o ~ p t-1 ~B O~N~O~Mr.. v~O~0O.O 0•Vf _t NNNt~1 t+17OV1~/1 hrOD ~~ 88588 ~T00 ~0O0 oro~_~oo 8888 000~,~1 V1 N0~1+1 Qpp8888888888pp GOOO~DO~OOI~•O O~OONOG~ W rNrt~f00v1OhR1O1~~G^e=+`~^V ~ NNN1+1 e 177V1h rh00 Y ~ i' '`~' ~¢ $ 88 N8888 OOT OHO e+~V 88 88 f` X07 8 8 888 88 8888 8 88 ~^OM~NI~~aO V1~00r0~OO~ ~ >_ j OON1~.•+vv~~ ANN ; ppV1op~~pp F'f M1VV NQ~~p t•i ~. O~r~p ~Vi V1 V1 ~Or 0~~ HV1~roo aoa~ ~M.7. ~~~.~. (~ - - g x ~ Q 8s8 ~~~ $ ~~~ s $ 8 8 ~ ~ ~~ = or ~Ot+1T .~NNen to 7 t~Ot•1N Ov1 nor ~ 2 0 t ! ! t t C1NP17 ~O O~N~0 oO OHO ~Nen .~. V ... ~a X888$8 8888 8888888 ~ ... . $~~~+fav~i~ OMOT~N .~ ~ :: ~ OHO OMOOe~OrT~ ~ ~N NNN O. CJ f`1 ~ ~ e • ''~ ~ ~ •~ cd N s K • ~ ~ ~ ~ '~C ( ~ p'1 y ~ l . V ' M , a' a ~ ~ N •~ C v ~ /l i~1 M M ~A ~ ~ ~ w O 3N E _ H [ ~I ~ N ~ 'Jy•r•1 ~ C +~ UJ U1 ~ ~ N U 3 N V1 C G_' N p~1 ~ ~ 'Q W uu ~~~.w 7,~ ~R 29 ~ ~~^~ 3 W HT 3 ea EE ern ~~ o ~'1~~w~ LL C pC, ~ 9 '~' O C~ V C w .n ~ C C ~y w ~ ~ ~ N L 7 y C .'~ N ° C ~ ~ ~ ° O+ ° W tl ~ Z ~~ ' a ~~ o0 3E ec~ ~d W o•°o'°' $ ° O d ~ v.. =~ o y._ Ci C~C~ > J ~~ o ~':: ~3 ww u~ ~3°H' :oc°i Z ~°1e~c x w c a d .. X ~ d~ y J; ~ 3~ ~ m /~ N C ~ p N O ~C ~I ,d G+ OD ~ "' ~ ~ '~ ~ Cry y Gr y ~T C W X W '" y X ~~ E E E '~ e~ `' o r•5 o a° ~ ~ ~3`~ $ E V! ~ Z W~ E° ~~ a a.° ~~~ c m g ~'3 3 ~ o W ~w~ ~ '~ 3 a .a ~ ~ I~~i. W N o a3i Q c w Z ~ 5~-.. E `o c ~ ~ y ~-% ~~' ~ w ~.E ~ ~ ~ C:u N ... od o p 'Ewe ~' y'O ~ Ci°~. Up '_ $^Ew 3 w•° p%~ L'c Q ~v E E o,.'n W a Q ~~ ~ a y OJ ~ 3 ~.y ~; ~ °° $ y F c $ o 'CO° V 3 'E 'y 3 ' s Q ~ o. o°. v ^ ~ c ~ E •o c c°i < LL d 'e ~ e Z ~, ~ ~« ~ G Cw y o ~:, W ~~ C ~ E rw.U W Lti '~ ~ Z Q8. W O °'o W < ~ t`'" p ~ ° e ~ $w° W 4: N 3 eN ~~ ~ a ~ O0° ~ a ~ ~ ~t~ ~ ~ ~ Q.n ~ -~E A° aT •~d a3ca a" a ~3~~a ~~ s r. ° yrs. a ~, a ,= `o ~' ,~~, `~ Z L~ ~ .E .,rx Z ~~w ~~ x Z u d ; Z o. < ~~~ ~ ! aoB u ~ ~ p eb ~ ~~ ~~ p a ~~ ma pr V rte. p W W a0 $$y~~+ O `. y' 7 F C tO ~ Q C m C v 2 r O.~ O ~ ~ a+ ai „`~~ ~ ggri.~. r~ u V G7 7 Q ~_ ~ ~ „y 1°.~N >A d N ~ v ? N w ~ ~•5 N ria~E~. ri ~ 3 N ~ ~ ~ ~' 3 aF~' N viw EsF ~~~~A~~~ SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET ,.~~; r~ .~ ~~~E: ~~ Proposed Development Name HONOR PARK NO. 3 City MERIDIAN~ir ." Date Reviewed 3/28/96 Preliminary Stage XXXXX Final Engineer/Developer Briggs Engr. / W.A. Hon The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Boise City Street Name Ordinance. "E. FRANKLIN ROAD" "S. EAST FIRST STREET" "E. WATERTOWER LANE" "S. STRATFORD DRIVE" "E. CORPORTATE DRIVE" "E SCHILLER LANE" "E SCENERY LANE" The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITT IVES OR DESIGNEES Ada County Engineer John Priester Ada Planning Assoc. City of Meridian Meridian Fire District Date Terri Raynor Date Representative ~~ ate 3 -2Ff'~'~ Representative ~~-L Date J ~~ /` , l NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed !!!! Sub Index Street Index 3N 1 E 18 Section NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS_ S~l~.~!' X.~/~ /'~~~-e~~S Z / F~ Z ~ i"'~~~ l~= Z • E~E~~Eo MAY 0 6 1996 r ..1TV QF MERIDIAN JAMES E. BRUCE, President SHERRY R. HUGER, Vice President SUSAN S. EASTLAKE, Secretary May 2, 1996 TO: William Hon 3010 W State St Boise, ID 83703 FROM: Karen Gallagher, Coordinator Development Services Divisio SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat-Honor Park #3 Subdivi ' Franklin Rd and Stratford Dr On May 1, 1996, the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District (hereafter called "District") took action on the Preliminary Plat as stated on the attached staff report. In order that the Final Plat may be considered by the District for acceptance, the Developer shall cause the following applicable standard conditions to be satisfied prior to District certification and endorsement: Drainage plans shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. 2. If public street improvements are required: Prior to any construction within the existing or proposed public right-of--way, the following shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District: a. Three complete sets of detailed street construction drawings prepared by an Idaho Registered Professional Engineer, together with payment of plan review fee. b. Execute and Inspection Agreement between the Developer and the District together with initial payment deposit for inspection and/or testing services. c. Complete all street improvements to the satisfaction of the District, or execute Surety Agreement between the Developer and the District to guarantee the completion of construction of all street improvements. ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714-6499 • Phone (208) 345-7680 • May 2, 1996 Page 2 3. Furnish copy of Final Plat showing street names as approved by the Local Government Agency having such authority ~eether with payment of fee chazged for the manufacturing and installation of all street signs, as required. 4. If Public Rights-of--Way Trust Find deposit is required, make deposit to the District in the form of cash or cashier's check for the amount specified by the District. 5. Furnish easements, agreements, and all other datum or documents as required by the District. 6. Furnish Final Plat drawings for District acceptance, certifications, and endorsement. The final plat must contain the signed endorsement. The final plat must contain the signed endorsement of the Owner's and Land Surveyor's certification. 7. Approval of the plat is valid for one year. An extension of one year will be considered by the Commission if requested within 15-days prior to the expiration date. Please contact me at 345-7680, should you have any questions. KG cc: Development Services Chron John Edney Chuck Rinaldi Briggs Engineering, Inc. City of Meridian ADA ~OUNTY HIGHWAY DI~RICT Development Services Division Development Application Report Preliminary Plat -Honor Park #3 Franklin Road and Stratford Drive Meridian Honor park is a 19-lot commercial subdivision on 22-acres. The site is located at the southwest corner of Franklin Road and Stratford Drive. This development is estimated to generate 3,660-13,720 additional vehicle trips per day based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation manual. Roads impacted by this development: Franklin Road Stratford Drive ACRD Commission Date -May 1, 1996 - 12:00 p.m. y ~ Pine Franklin ~ I SITE ~ ~ ~, 0 N i3 0 W E S I I !. i ~ ~ I r.l _l ~ _~ GqS e ~T ~~ 5 T, , MqR ~,N, ~_ .LI. _ T'TT ~ ~ ~ ~ J y ~ ~ L1. X15 T. ti o x d Y S T. ~ ~ ~~ ~ rt f IImp i i s L1L S ~° ~~ -.- ~ .- ~ ~ '. ;~ e.' s: S~ - ----~ ~• ~ 55 h _ 8 -- . _ --- M ~ N s __ T _____._ 5 8 . O 9 , 4 Q ~ `~ ~ ' ---. // I ~ . i3 y 22 23 24 18 g 0 • 16 E I~~AN 21 20 19 15 14 13 12 E. KING ST. 14 13 12 II 10 9 8 7 6 5 W Is Q 19 Q 20 ~ 23 2 u~ 16 IT W - 18 21 22 I `~. .. 1 N" ~ ~~' ~' :RTOWER LN RK SUB. z ~ ,~o ~' v ~,~c. ~o ~'~ I y i i '~ ~~~~ M~f21DlAN C~~rERY -- -- .. .~0~ p~N ~IqR N~N~~ '4~ .... oaa so.. o pus v.+m s uu __~ _ _ Ch asn«eryp atlr AWrN117nal1r W e 8 oEtvai ~xrnan~aR - ~ ~I..Ir...q et xin-a goHOx ~ ~~ t~ Y 7 ~ ~ : ~ ; • 4 ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ 3 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~e ~ W ~ ~wQg 1 g J ~€~~ I I I l i d l I\ ~~ ~ I 3 j~ 1 ~ kS yO F Ft II <~ dd L. 5v 8! %~ ~~ 1 ~ ~~ - 1 I .~ ` ~ Y i i\ ~j / '~ ~ ~- -.~ 1 ~ 1 _ i - %,~,e _ ~ ~ a 1 •; ~ a e ~ ~~ ~s ~ ;~ ~~. v f ~~ 9 = 3 7 R4 ~ ~ ~i 1 RQ ~ 1 _ ~ 3 - __________~______ J ~ _ f a ; - ~1 ---- -~----- -r-----~ --~-- - ~ ---- ~ ~~. II <~ it i~ / I - w 1 , °' ~ ~ 1'~ ~/ ~~~ - x i ~ ~' a ~ ~~ ~ YI rem 1 / ~ i i ~ ,, ~~ i d ~~ ~ { ~~~ ~ ~ I ~1~ ~ t ~~ti s '- !! ~ ~ 3 j ~~¢ - s r ;~si ~~ avmll a< ~_=_____ ---_ --- 1a7Yap a4W1/ asra ~ _•___ ~ I \FitJN-YRLJ. u~t Facts and Findings: • A. General Information CG -Existing zoning 21.64 -Acres 19 -Proposed building lots 0 -Square feet of existing building 0 -Total lineal feet of proposed public streets 281 -Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) West Ada -Impact Fee Benefit Zone Western Cities -Impact Fee Assessment District Franklin Road Principal arterial with bike route designation Traffic count 6,685 in 1993 1,175-feet of frontage 50 to 65-feet existing right-of--way (25-feet south of centerline) 90-feet required right-of--way (45-feet from ultimate street centerline) Franklin Road is improved with 2 traffic lanes with curb and gutter on the north side of road. Franklin Road has an average pavement width of 34-feet between East 1st Street and Locust Grove Road. Stratford Drive Collector street with no pathway designation No traffic count available 1, 310-feet of frontage 50-feet existing right-of--way (30-feet west of ultimate street centerline) 60-feet required right-of--way (30-feet from ultimate street centerline) Stratford Drive is improved with 31-feet of pavement with curb, gutter and sidewalk on the west side abutting the site. The Meridian Cemetery abuts the east side of Stratford Drive. B. The site is currently undeveloped. The site is bordered by a park on the west, Honor Park Subdivision No.2 on the south, Stratford Drive on the east, and Franklin Road on the north. C. Included in the District's unfunded projects in the Five Year Work Program is a signal at Stratford Drive and reconstruction of Franklin Road from East 1st Street to Locust Grove Road. Staff recommends that the required driveway offsets at the corner of Stratford Drive and Franklin Road be based on a signalized intersection. D. District policy states that direct access to arterials and collectors is restricted to a maximum of three driveways for a parcel having over 600-feet of frontage. Access to the development is proposed by two private roads from Stratford Drive, six lots with frontage only on Franklin Road, and one lot on the corner of Franklin Road and Overland Road. Staff HONORPAR.WPD Page 2 recommends that dir~ot access to Stratford Drive be prohi~d except for the corner lot (Lot 24), which may have a driveway located a minimum of 175-feet south of the future back of curb on Franklin Road. The 6 lots that have frontage only on Franklin Road have a combined frontage of 1,010-feet. Staff recommends that cross access easements be required between all six of the lots with a maximum of three driveways on Franklin Road. The three driveways should be paved 30- feet wide with 15-foot radius pavement tapers at the edge of pavement on Franklin Road and aligned with 3rd Street and 5th Street or offset a minimum of 150-feet with a minimum separation of 125-feet between driveways (measured from near edge to near edge). No driveway should be located east of 5th Street (less than 220-feet west of the back of curb on Stratford Drive) and if a driveway is aligned with 5th Street, it may be restricted to right- turns only in the future with the installation of a traffic signal. E. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to provide pavement widening on Franklin Road for a center turn lane at Stratford Drive and the three driveways, because of the estimated traffic volumes to be generated at build out of this development. F. In accordance with District policy, staff recommends that the applicant be required to construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Franklin Road abutting the parcel (approximately 1,180-feet) prior to issuance of any required permits or District approval of a final plat, whichever occurs first. G. Graveled private roads abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. Staff recommends that the applicant pave the private road their full width (24-feet minimum) at least 30-feet beyond the back of sidewalk on Franklin Road. Staff also recommends that the applicant install street name and stop signs for the private road. H. ACRD does not make any assurances that the private road which is a part of this application will be accepted as a public road if such a request is made in the future. Substantial redesign and reconstruction costs will be necessary in order to qualify this road for public ownership and maintenance. I. The transportation system will be adequate to accommodate the additional traffic generated by this proposed development. J. This application is scheduled for a public hearing by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission on Apri12, 1996. The following requirements are provided as conditions for approval: Site Specific Requirements: 1. Dedicate 45-feet of right-of--way from the ultimate street centerline of Franklin Road abutting the parcel (20 additional feet) by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution HONORPAR.WPD Page 3 of a warranty deed pi~to issuance of a building permit (or ~r required permits), whichever occurs first. The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of--way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone. If the owner wishes to be paid for the additional right-of--way, the owner must submit a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance x#188. 2. Utility street cuts in the new pavement on Stratford Drive will not be allowed unless approved by the District Commission. Contact Construction Services at 345-7667 (with file numbers) for details. 3. Construct a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Franklin Road abutting the parcel, located 1- foot north of the new right-of--way line. 4. Construct the approaches for the two private roads as 30-foot wide curb returns with 15-foot radii. The private roads shall be paved a minimum of 30-feet beyond the back of sidewalk. Provide a plan showing how the private road grade meets the public road. District Policy requires a design approach speed of 20 MPH and a maximum intersection approach grade of 2 % for at least 40-feet. Install street name and stop signs for the private road which may be ordered through the District at the cost of $115. Verification of t_he correct name of the road will be required 5. Construct a center turn lane on Franklin Road abutting the parcel. Coordinate the tapers and road width with Traffic Services staff. 6. Direct lot access to Stratford Drive shall be prohibited except for the lot at the corner of Franklin Road and Stratford Drive that may have a driveway located a minimum of 175-feet south of the future back of curb on Franklin Road. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. 7. Provide cross access easements between the seven lots fronting on Franklin Road. A maximum of three driveways are approved on Franklin Road if the driveways are aligned or offset a minimum of 150-feet from 3rd Street and 5th Street and a minimum separation of 125-feet between driveways (measured from near edge to near edge). No driveway shall be located east of 5th Street, and if a driveway is aligned with 5th Street, it may be restricted to right-turns only in the future. The driveways shall be paved 30-feet wide with 15-foot radii pavement tapers at the edge of pavement on Franklin Road. 8. Other than the three access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Franklin Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. HONORPAR.WPD Page 4 Standard Requirement 1. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writing to the Development Services Supervisor. T_ he request shall specifically iden i v each re4uiremen to he recnnsid yeti and inchuie a written PXplanatlOri Of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hard hip or ineq~ The written request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9.00 a m on the day scheduled for Commission action. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting agenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regarding the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the agenda by the Commission. 2. After Commission action, any request for reconsideration of the Commission's action shall be made in writing to the Development Services Supervisor within two days of the action and shall include a minimum fee of $110.00. The request for reconsideration shall specifically iden i each requirement to be recon idered and incl ode written ri~cnmenratinn of tiara that was not available to the Co mic. ion a the rim of it original decision The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next regular meeting of the Commission. If the Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will be notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. 3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #188, also known as, Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. Aright-of--way permit must be obtained from ACRD for any street or utility construction within the public right-of--way. Utility cuts should be combined where practical to limit pavement damage. i ili y street cuts in roads paved within t_he last five years will not be allowed unless approved by the Di trict (''nmmissi~n_ Contact Construction Services at 345- 7667 (with file number) for details. 5. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and appropriate action by ACHD prior to District approval of the final plat or issuance of building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. The proposed drainage system shall retain all storm water on-site and shall conform to the requirements of the city or county having jurisdiction. Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the public right-of--way or in a common lot owned by a homeowners association set aside specifically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, or other valuable amenities placed in said easement. Drainage lots and their use restrictions shall be noted on the plat (when applicable). HONORPAR.WPD Page 5 6. Locate driveways a mum of 5-feet from the side lot prope~ lines when driveways are not to be shared with the adjacent property. 7. If sidewalk is to be constructed or is currently abutting the site, construct pedestrian ramps on the corner of all street intersection in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 40-1335. 8. Dedicate up to a 20-foot x 20-foot right-of--way triangle (or appropriate curve) to keep street improvements within the public right-of--way at all intersections abutting and/or within the development by means recordation of the final plat or prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. 9. Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across parcel. 10. Continue borrow ditch drainage abutting parcel (culvert may be required). 11. Provide written approval from the appropriate irrigation/drainage district authorizing storm runoff into their system. 12. If street improvements are required, locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drainage ditches and appurtenances, etc.) outside of the public right-of--way. Authorization for relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. If determined by the District, existing irrigation facilities may remain in the right-of--way with District review and approval of easements recorded for future relocation at a later date. 13. Locate proposed sign(s) out of the public right-of--way and out of the clear-vision sight- triangle of all street and driveway intersections. 14. Install a stop sign on every unsignalized approach of a project street to an intersection involving a collector or arterial as the cross-street. The stop sign shall be installed when the project street is first accessible to the motoring public. 15. The developer is required to install street name signs at the locations approved by the Ada County Highway District. Purchase street name signs, sign poles, and mounting hardware from ACHD's Traffic Operations Department or an approved outside supplier. The District will not manufacture street signs until a copy of the recorded plat showing the recording data has been provided to Development Services staff. 16. Any portion of a street which is required by the District to be designated as "no parking" shall be posted by the installation of standard "no parking" signs. A signing plan shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer and submitted to ACHD Traffic Services staff for their review and approval prior to final plat approval by the District. If a final plat is not required, the signing plan approval shall be completed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permit). 17. Provide a clear vision sight triangle at all driveway and street intersections. Within this triangle no obstruction higher than 36-inches above the top of pavement will be allowed, including but not limited to landscaping, berms, fences, walls or shrubs. The triangle shall HONORPAR.WPD Page 6 be defined with the l~leg measured 200-feet to 540-feet (d~nding on speed limit) along the centerline of any road; and the short leg measured from the curb line of the road 20-feet along the centerline of the intersecting driveway or street (see District Policy Figure F7). Provide notes of these restrictions on the plat/site plan and street construction plans. 18. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District for review and appropriate action. 19. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for review and appropriate action by ACHD. 20. All public streets and drainage systems shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and policies. 21. Specifications, land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACRD shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54-1215. 22. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 23. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 24. The connection of driveways to the public street system is not allowed without approval of the District. To obtain approval, anyone proposing to construct a driveway is required to contact the Construction Services Division of the District to obtain a proper permit prior to commencing construction per District Policy 7207.9. 25. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. HONORPAR.WPD Page 7 26. Any change by the a~cant in the planned use of the proper~vhich is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless awaiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. ~y p 21 HONORPAR.WPD Page 8 CENTRAL C •• DIS~RICT PRHEALTH DEPARTMENT Rezone # 1T~ENT S C E ii V E D Return to: ~A~ ~ ~ ~9~~ ^ Boise ^ Eagle ~~d'~"''y ~~;~ a~~i1=~71DIAi~ ^ Garden city Meridian ' Tonal Use # / ^ Kuna Prelimina /Final /Short Plat A/~'2 ~,~t~ ~ [~ /~/f~~~ ~'.3 ^ ACZ ^ I. We have No Objections to this Proposal. DISTRICT HEALTH D Environmental Health Division ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. We can Approve this Proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: ^ 2 feet ^ 4 feet ^ 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage 'central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water ,[~" 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines ~tentral water ~. 10. Street Runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ I I. Stormwater disposal systems shall be reviewed by relative to: ^ Waste Disposal ^ Injection Well rules. ^ Groundwater Protection ^ 12. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ 13. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 14. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store ~- I S. J i ,~S2.N 1~~.2 ,/~s9y/.4-(`r~i~1E~/7~ C'bY 7~7'Y.•'g' /.S Date: ~ / ~ ~/ ~~ ,¢ "'7'~j-Cti~-~. _ Reviewed By: fDHD 10/91 rcb, rcv. I/95 C~.WTRAL •• DISTRICT ~1'HEALTH DEPARTMENT MAIN OFFICE • 701 N. ARMSTRONG PL • BOISE, ID. 83104 • (208) 375.5211 • FAX: 321-8500 To prevent and treat disease and disability; to promote healthy l}' festyles; and to protect and promote the health and quality of our environment. STORMVVATER MANAGEMENT RECOIVIlVIENDATIONS We recommend that the first one half inch of stormwater be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality. The engineers and architects involved with the design of this project should obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals that could be used for guidance are: .1) GUIDELINES FOR TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF STORMWATER RUN OFF. Idaho Division of Environmental Quality, Southwest Idaho Regional Office, September 1995. 2) STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND, State of Washington Department of Ecology, February 1992. 3) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER AND SITE DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT. Serving Valley, Elmore Boise, and Ada Counties Ada / 6oi~ County OIAc~ WIC Boise • Maidlan Ettnotrr Caunry OMa Elrnore Courtly Ollke VaBhr ~h OtBa 707 N. Amishorlg Po. 1606 Roberts 520 E. 8th greet N. d Envirorrsrentd Headh P.O. Box 1448 Bone iD. 83704 Boise. ID. Mountain Home. ID. 190 S. 4th Street E. McCd. 0.83638 . Erwiro. Healits: 327.7499 83705 Ph.334-3355 83647 Ph. 587.4407 Mountan Hone. ID. Ph. 6347194 fmriy PlarnYp: 327.1400 324 Merir9an. ID. 83647 Ph 587.9225 knmunaatlons: 327.7450 83642 Ph. 8886525 Nutrition: 327-7460 uen ee~ ~.ee /~1 M OFFICIALS r~ WILLIAM G. BF_RG, JR., City Clerk JAi31G;E L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., Clty Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Flra Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 P if<Z COMMISSION Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Public Worf:sBuilding Department (208) 88'7- TIM HEPPER Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-444~~~a~~ (~ JIM SHEARER ~~./ GREG OSLUND ROBERT D. CORRIE MAR 2 ~ MALCOLM MACCOY Mayor 996 NAMPA & A91~±~If~I,~N TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON D~~~.~~T~~IPROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: 1,Nill Berg, City Clerk by: April 2. 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/18/96 HEARING DATE`. 4/ 2/96 REQUEST: Preliminary Plat for Honor Park No 3 Subdivision BY: William Hon LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: South of Franklin Road, West of Stratford Drive JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z _GREG OSLUND, P/Z _TIM HEPPER, P/Z BOB CORRIE, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C GLENN BENTLEY, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8r FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLRMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District requires that a Land Use Change/Site Development application be filed for review prior to final platting. Contact Donna Moore at 343-1884 or 466-7861 for further information All laterals and waste ways must be protected. Municipal surface drainage must be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must review drainage plans The developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805. It is recommended that irrigation water be made available to all developments within Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. ~EcE`vEC? APR~~199f HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live WALT W. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CITY OF MERIDIAN C GLENN R. BENTLEY E CITY OF~ MERIDIAt\r • • ~?a~r~ia ~i '~~i~tdu~ ~Ifiniga~asi 9~a.~crct 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-888-6201 Phones: Area Code 208 Stan McHutchison Briggs Engineering, Inc. 1111 South Orchard, Suite 600 Boise, ID 83705 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Boise 343-1884 SHOP: Nompo 466-0663 Boise 345-2431 RE: Land Use Change Application for Honor Park Subdivision No. 3 Dear Stan: Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to file with the Irrigation District for its review on the above- referenced development. If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call on Donna Moore at the District's office or John Anderson, the District's Water Superintendent at the District's shop. Sincerely, DAREN R. COON, SECRETARY/TREASURER NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT DRC/dnm cc: File Water Superintendent William A. Hon City of Meridian enc. ~. ~~ APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 5 April 1996 MAR 22 '96 04~45PM IPCO BOISE OPERATIONS ~'~~• P.1i1 ,:~ .• ~;; OFFICIALS ~~ . WILLIAM G. BERG. JR., Cly Clenr JANICE L. GASS, Cly Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E.. Chy Englnser BRUCE D. STUART. Weser Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste Wster Supt. OENNIS J. SUMMERS, PerNS Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P $ Z AdmMlsaator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Suponrlsor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL' OORDON, P01109 OMef WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR.. AttOmby KUB OF TREASURE Vq(I,L~' A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO . MERIDIAN, IDAIiO 83642 Pbonc 0108) 688-4433 • FAX (2Q8) 867-a813 Public Works/Building Aopetaaent (206) 687-2211 Motor Vehiclc/pti~ea Incense (206) 868.4443 ROBERT D. CORRIE Mayor COIINGIL M~B~R,,C wALT w. MoRROw. PrerJdero RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M. Rl)1JNTREE GLENN R. BENTLEY , P ~ Z CoMMlssleN JIM JOHNSON, ChAlrmen TIM MEPPER JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND MALCOLM MACCOY TItANSMiTTAL TO AGENCYES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: 2 9 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/18/96 HEARING DATE: 4L2/96 REQUEST: elimina at for Ho Park No 3 dii 'on BY: William Hon - - ~ TION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT:_ South of Franklin Road. Went of Stratford ~ ~~ H ~ ~ ~, s ° ~ c ^~ N ~ JOHNSON, P2 LCOLM MACCOY, P/Z I SHEARER, P/Z c a ~ R g N ~ s>o G OSLUND, P/Z •HEPPER, P2 ~ A ~' ~ °° M I CORRIE, MAYOR ~ , JALD TOLSMA, C/C E ` ~' a ,RI.IE ROUNTREE, C/C v a ~ ,T MORROW, C/C NN BENTLEY, C/C ... z ; ER DEPARTMENT Q ~ Y IER DEPARTMENT A m M .DING DEPARTMENT '3 °^ ~ :'DEPARTMENT ~ ~ ~ y. CE DEPARTMENT O k J ~ , ! ATTC1171uFV ~ ~ a~ °~° ~ u_ ~ ~ o~ ~o ~ li ~ ii RE~~I~Ep MAR 2 2 1996 • CITE` .;¢ • ~v9ERIDIAN - - We require a permanent 10-foot wide public utilities easement along all lots adjacent to a road right-of-way dedicated to public or private use. ~+~' Tim Adams •,~, ZZ-~~' Idaho Power 322-2047 MAR 22 '96 15 46 PAGE.01 MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) FDA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT lJ4DA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: WlLI.'AM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STl1ART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney HU ~ B OF TREASURE VALLEY COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live WALT W. MORROW, President CITY OF MERIDIAN RONALD R.TOLSMA EE C GLENN R. BENTLEY 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 P & Z COMMISSION Phone (208) 888-4433 • FA,X (208) 887-4813 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Public WorksBuilding Deparnnent (208) 887-2211 TIM HEPPER Motor Vehicle/Driver; license (208) 888-4443 JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND ROBERT D CORRIE MALCOLM MACCOY Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning 8< Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by:.~,,,~ . TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/18/96 HEARING DATE: 4/ REQUEST: ~/Y~ BY: William Hon LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: South of Franldin Road, West of Stratford eve JIM JOHNSON, P/Z ~,MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z -GREG OSLUND, P/Z -TIM HEPPER, P/Z -BOB CORRIE, MAYOR -RONALD TOLSMA, C/C -CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C -WALT MORROW, C/C -GLENN BENTLEY, C/C -WATER DEPARTMENT -SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT -POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER -CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT EC~i V ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION R ~Q CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH APR 0 NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT 3 199 SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY OF IvIERIDIAI' U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: TZEC~ui~ .Co73 ,GGO.~/y ~i-2 ayXU.tc ,cyq~yc ~~• .s~T ~cS/t~~s ~ra Diu ~o cu'p /3c1,~ fZm~x_ f~'iz.E ~7'ue~E us~E. %~ ~/~~6 s~+Fa-.c.~g~r- ~'~rnc ~d,D. ~ciu..,F~u.~~w-- ra ~ Goc~.~~ .a~~ ~°P~o~ Js~- rY¢,~ ~l~ F~N63/~t5E.~2 ~ ~v~~R ~i°T. ~NGINEERIIyG BRIGGS !NG May 13, 1996 Mr. Bruce Freckleton Assistant to City Engineer City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Honor Park No. 3 Subdivision Dear Bruce: This letter is in response to your memorandum dated Apri13, 1996. GENERAL COMMENTS KECEIVED ,.:„ IAN CRY ENG~EER 1. We will comply with City Ordinance 11-9-605.M. 2. We will comply with City Ordinance 5-7-517. 3. This will be done. 4. We will comply with City Ordinance 11-9-606.B. 5. Noted. 6. An approval letter will be submitted with the final plat. 7. The fire hydrant locations are shown on the preliminary plat and will be verified on the development plans. 8. The 100-Year Flood Plain boundary shown on the preliminary plat was mapped before the Nine Mile Drain was piped through Storey Park. The FIRM's were never amended to account for this pipe. 9. Storm water runoff in Scenery and Shiller Lanes will be retained in seepage beds on lots 12 and 18, block 2. All other street runoff will be retained in right-of--way in Stratford Drive and Franklin Road. There are no plans to direct runoff from this project to existing drainage ditches. 10. No comment necessary. SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS 1. The location of the existing sewer line shown on the preliminary plat is based on record drawings. Additional field verification will be completed during detailed design of the subdivision. 2. Noted. 3. There is precedence for construction of private streets in commercial subdivisions with the city. However, we do recognize the need for a larger cul-de-sac to accommodate fire trucks. Therefore, we propose a 50 foot radius for both cul-de-sacs and installation of no parking signs on both sides of each private road. If the private roadway width is 28' back to back with no parking on the road, we feel the roadway will be more than wide enough for truck traffic or emergency access. Please note that ACHD made an objection to the private roads. 951004.It2 1111 S. Orchard, Suite 600 • Boise, Idaho 83705 • (208) 344-9700 Fax# (208) 345-2950 ~~ ~~ BRIGGS ENGINEERING, ANC. 1111 S. Orchard, Suite 600 • Boise, Idaho 83705 • (208) 345-2881 FAX # (208) 345-2950 4. Noted. 5. A 20' landscape easement is shown on the preliminary plat. Since this is a commercial development, there won't be an active subdivision association until several lots have been developed. Therefore, we believe it is necessary to work out the detail of the construction and maintenance of the landscaping with city staff during the design phase. 6. Done. See note 12 below for a discussion regarding irrigation. 7. See note 9 above. 8. Noted. 9. The dedication statements for all easements and rights-of--way will be noted on the final plat. 10. The existing sewer line is in a legal easement. We propose to leave the easement as is and provide separate lots where new sewer lines are proposed. 11. The lots fronting Franklin Road have been adjusted so the existing sewer easement is adjacent to a property line. Because the sewer line is in an existing easement, we feel the easement should remain in place. However, the developer can provide assurance to the city that no obstruction will be placed on this easement that will block city access to the sewer line. 12. Please note that this property has no access to irrigation water. Since there is a moratorium on new wells for irrigation proposes a separate pressurized irrigation system is not feasible. 13. Noted. 14. Noted. 15. ACHD is also requiring shared accesses. This will be done. Also enclosed for your use are 12 copies of the preliminary plat as revised per this letter. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. ~.~a~-~ Stan McHutchison, P. E. Enclosures: Preliminary Plat - 12 copies cc: Bill Hon w/enclosures Ron Hon w/enclosures 951004.It2 »~ • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 5 • conditions set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law. Hepper: Second Johnson: We have a motion and a second to send a recommendation onto City Council as stated, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #5: TABLED APRIL 9, 1996: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VACATION OF A PORTION OF GEM STREET RIGHT OF WAY BY WILD SHAMROCK PARTNERSHIP: Johnson: We have a request from the applicant that we deal with this as late as we can on the agenda because of a priori appointment. I have agreed to that so we will skip from item 5 and go to Item 6. Do we need a motion to change that on the agenda or not? Crookston: Yes Johnson: I would entertain a motion to consider this later in the meeting. Shearer: I so move Oslund: Second Johnson: It has been moved and seconded that we address item 5 later in the meeting to accommodate the applicant, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #6: PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED FROM APRIL 9, 1996: REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HONOR PARK NO. 3 SUBDIVISION BY WILLIAM HON: Johnson: This is a continued public hearing we will be taking testimony and applicant's and people testifying need to be sworn. I will now open this public hearing again and continue it, Is the applicant or representative here that would like to address the Commission at this time? Becky Bowcutt, Briggs Engineering, 1111 South Orchard, was sworn by the City Attorney. Bowcutt: We appreciate the Commission deferring this item from the last agenda. Our • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 6 client was out of town and we needed his guidance to address some of the comments made by staff. This is a continuation of the Honor Park development or I-84 Business Park as some people call it. This is Meridian .Speedway, the first two phases that we platted along Watertower Lane are right here. Then this is what we are asking for approval on this L-shaped piece, this is Franklin and this is Stratford Drive. Originally we requested 19 lots, these are commercial lots, it is a C-G zone. It is on 21.64 acres. After we met with the Highway District they allowed us three approaches onto Franklin Road for these lots. We needed to have shared approaches and we needed some alignment with 3rd and. we needed to stay west of 5th or align with 5th but no closer to this intersection. So we have since reduced the seven lots we had fronting on Franklin to five and just enlarged them. Made for a little bit better lots because of the shared approaches. This particular lot here is the only lot that will be allowed to take access on Stratford Drive. These lots are intended to take access internally. What we are proposing is a, this is a lot in itself, it is 40 feet wide and then we have modified this.for a 50 foot radius and these we are proposing to be private. The reason being is Mr. Hon has indicated that he doesn't know who his users will be, they may end up wanting a larger portion other than say just a one lot user, maybe they want 3 lots therefore that would function more as a driveway into a commercial facility versus like a public street. They are quite short, they are only about, I think they come in about 400 approximately 400 feet or a little bit less than that. We have reviewed staff's comments, Stan McHutchinson addressed the comments and made the changes and that was sent back this week. I think that is about it, we have sewer and water available, we stubbed to these lots on Stratford because there are no cuts allowed on Stratford Drive. We have an existing sewer main running along the rear here. Staff has asked that these sewer lines be put in separate lots. In Mr. McHutchinson's letter he has indicated that we will comply with those but the owner Mr. Hon did disagree in putting the existing line in a separate lot since it runs down the far perimeter and it wasn't in a lot originally it has been in an easement for a period of time. Do you have any questions, that is about it, pretty straight forward commercial plat. Johnson: Questions of Ms. Bowcutt? Hepper: Is there going to be some landscaping along any of the streets? Bowcutt: Yes, staff indicated they want a 20 foot landscaping area along all of the lots on Franklin Road because it is one of the view corridors. We do show the 20 foot landscape easement along the front, I talked to Mr. Hon based on the Planning and Zoning Commissions past concerns about landscaping and doing it in a piece meal fashion 1 told him it would be imperative in his covenants to set forth standards and that they maintain that landscaped area. I also indicated that the Planning and Zoning Commission in the past has not looked favorable on each lot doing their landscaping as it goes in but on the fact that when the first lot goes in then the developer has a responsibility of putting in all • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 7 that landscaping in. So we have one continuous landscaped area. Hepper: So is that what you propose to do? Bowcutt: Yes, that is what he indicated we would be acceptable. Hepper: Who would be responsible for the maintenance? Bowcutt: In the easement each land owner would be responsible for the maintenance unless this body thinks otherwise. MacCoy: Becky, one of the things that I recall (inaudible) since it backs up to Storey Park I thought we asked for a buffer or a fence along that division line in there. Bowcutt: I think Ms. Stiles' comment was that there should be a fence along there in that perimeter. I think her, on item 13 she said temporary perimeter fencing should be provided prior to obtaining building permits to contain construction debris. You are talking about a permanent fence, I don't think anybody has addressed that. MacCoy: I think one of our concerns was that since it was backing up to Storey Park which is a park that the City uses (inaudible) should be a division there between industrial type buildings and that of a park system. Bowcutt: I agree with you. MacCoy: Shari where did that go to? Stiles: Commission MacCoy, Commissioners, Storey Park already had a chain link fence the length of that property. MacCoy: That is a six foot high fence? Johnson: It is actually in excess of that. MacCoy: What do you think of that Gary as being the only fence we have between an industrial unit? Smith: Commissioners, I guess my concern is primarily in that northeast corner of Storey park where the baseball diamond is located. I know for a fact there are a lot of fowl balls hit out of the fenced area of Storey Park into the Hon property. Right now they just hop the fence and go get them. But we talked about at one time some way to access that area for Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 8 that reason. I don't know if that is feasible or not. MacCoy: I wouldn't think so with having the thing owned by industrial people their own control that we could ask people to go look for fowl balls in their backyards. I would like to see some type of, I guess what I am asking you to do Becky is take it back and ask them about a division line between their building complex and the park system. Bowcutt: What would you recommend for some type of buffer? Do you have something in mind? MacCoy: Generally, no I don't really. Bowcutt: Are you looking for something sight obscuring like a sight obscuring fence or a berm. MacCoy: If you have a sight obscuring fence I think that would be up to your owners, they may want that for their own reasons not to have a park living in their backyard or their lessees or owners in that area. So I think it kid of falls back into your court in one sense. I have raised the question that it would be beneficial to your clients that you have such a barricade or a break line or something tike that from the park, the kids somewhat. Bowcutt: I will take that recommendation back to my client. Shearer: If there is a six foot chain link fence there they can put slats in it if you want to obscure it. Smith: Mr. Chairman, Commissioners, I think I have mislead you a little bit on that fence. I think the fence that I am thinking of is the fence along the baseball diamond. There is a fence am I not right Mr. Chairman? Johnson: No, there is a fence on the dividing line on the property line. Smith: Because when you are chasing the fowl balls they just crawl through a farm fence to go from the park into the farm field. Johnson: Not. any more, it is chained and the gate is closed most of the time. They open it when they go in after the balls is all. It is a substantial fence, it is a second hand fence is the problem that it was moved from another location so it is not in the greatest state of repair. It is close to the back stop and sign cant number of fowl balls go back there every ball game I have been at, hundreds of them. The only way I can see to eliminate that would be construction of some huge netting or something. It would have to be 50 feet tall • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 9 almost to stop the fowl balls. And I am sure Mr. Hon is aware of that, he has had the property for a long time. Anybody buying that property is going to be realizing that they are going to be next to a lighted field that plays at night with a lot of kids and that is just the proximity of the thing. That is the way it works out. MacCoy: I was thinking more of the visual type of thing from the standpoint of your client. Bowcutt: Well on one hand the park is kind of a pretty little amenity to have next door. The clients I guess if I was putting some type of an office building or something I would like to be able to view the park. (Inaudible) Bowcutt: If I could address the fowl balls, since we are putting these sewer lines in a separate lot that can't be fenced or obstructed therefore Gary couldn't we create a corridor for them to come back and get the balls? Smith: Well, the fowl balls in the lots I would expect those lots will be fenced and once you get, you could of course access the street from that sewer corridor but getting access into the backs of those lots is where the baseballs will be located. Bowcutt: If they had a secured area. Smith: If they were fenced off and locked off then the balls would be lost to the property owners. Bowcutt: Maybe we should put a note on the plat that each lot owner will return all fowl balls (inaudible). Johnson: I think that Malcolm's point is he wants everybody to be aware of the fact that the park is there, it is operational it has been for a long time and only operates for a few months a year. They start baseball in March and they virtually end it the first of August. Bowcutt: I will stress that to Mr. Hon and indicate that whoever looks at that these lots to make sure they are fully aware of the ball field and the ramifications that go with being next to it. MacCoy: I am glad you made the change in your lots along Franklin that was a concern of mine. I was hoping that ACRD and your client would come to an agreement on that because I thought there was going to be a problem. We noted that at the time. So I commend you for that one. • •. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 10 Oslund: 1 have a question, I am not familiardOets {h o a°Phe way ou't to your peoperty I ne? is what is the limit of the developed park, 9 Bowcutt: This is the park right here (inaudible) Oslund: And you are proposing general commercial? Bowcutt: It is zoned C-G currently and we are platting it. Oslund: I guess my concern, what I, I just don't see much of a compatibility between the park, I guess I would like to see something more than a fence. Johnson: If I can interrupt, part of this is already development and we (inaudible). The southerly side, what Mr. Hon is doing is developing the westerly side (inaudible) finishes his property. Oslund: And we didn't require anything of the applicant in terms of say a berm or landscaping between his development and the park? Bowcutt: Right here, no not to my knowledge. Johnson: Nothing, there is nothing there. Oslund: Are those, the lots on the south have they been developed? Bowcutt: Some of them and all the roads and all the utilities are in and he put Stratford in here too. Johnson: (inaudible) the lot that is utilized right now temporarily for speedway parking which is directly across from the visitors center are you familiar with that. And then (inaudible) new buildings in there now that are partially rented or leased and a couple of lots are still for sale there. Hepper: I have somewhat the same concerns as Greg and Malcolm if it was limited office space the back of those buildings would just be maybe just a building with some windows. But where it is C-G commercial there could be storage yards in the back, if there was for example a plumbing shop and they have a storage yard in the back where they keep their supplies. Johnson: I think that is a strong likelihood that is the type of tenant they will get there. • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 11 Hepper: Not so much from the tenants looking out on the park but from the people in the park looking back the other way they are going to be looking at a bunch of storage yards potentially. There is nothing wrong with storage yards, but I think we need to have a screened in fence rather than a chain link fence something to screen off those storage yards and t believe that is part of the city ordinance too if there are storage yards Bowcutt: With that type of an intensive use yes I would recommend it be screened. Hepper: I don't know if that is a City ordinance if all storage yards need to have a screened in fence if we need to make that a condition of this or if that would only have to apply in these cases where they would be a storage yard. (Inaudible) Hepper: There may only be one or two across there or there may be several of them, it would be hard to know at this point if there are going to be any or not. If it was the back of a building with maybe just some windows and landscaping there chain link fence would be fine but if was a storage yard or a vehicle storage lot or something else of that nature then I think a screened fence. Shearer: A lot of those have to have a conditional use to go in there don't they? Bowcutt: Some are principle permitted uses that could go in without going through a review. I would probably recommend that you add a condition that it be addressed the differences in the uses as far as the more intensive uses should provide some obscuring fencing. MacCoy: Igo back to the fact that your client may find that very good to have that (Inaudible) Oslund: That concern, we don't have any parks anyway, we only have this park that is it. As hard as we try to get other parks maybe that will happen and maybe it won't. I tell you if we allow a development to come in and at this point it is basically going to surround our single park on three sides it seems to me it should be attractive and there should be some screening. The last thing I would like to see is a park surrounded by commercial tilt ups 30 feet high and you (inaudible) So I don't know if I like the idea of kind of piece mealing it either depending on what kind of development it is. It would be nice to see some kind of consistency throughout. Even if we missed the south side, that is a small portion, what we are considering here is three times longer what has already been approved as a perimeter around the park. • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 12 MacCoy: I agree with you Greg because I have driven up into that site and actually walked that site and the lower section down here is not a problem but you can see in the upper section there it will be a problem there. 1 don't want to see it piece meal, if they are going to do it do the whole thing. I think it would look tacky to do it piece meal. Hepper: If we do require a fence are we looking at a 6 foot cedar fence? Shearer: We have already got a chain link fence there. It would be a lot easier to just slat the fences there and take care of both problems at once rather than having two different kinds of fences. Hepper: I am not really crazy about a six foot cedar fence over a period of time they bleach out and the boards warp and twist and they break. Within several years you are going to have a real expensive eyesore along the park there instead of something that is going to be maintained. MacCoy: It is easier to maintain than one of these with the chain link and the slats in it then it is the board. Hepper: And maybe the vinyl slats rather than the cedar slats. Something like that would maybe be more appropriate. Oslund: Can't we consider landscaping? Just keep the chain link fence where it is at, but provide some landscaping buffer on this development side. We have a 20 foot sanitary easement already, if we made that a little wider and not, provide so that there is still room for the easement to get access to maintain that sanitary sewer but provide enough room in there also for plants and trees for .instance. Bowcutt: We would have to be careful about the times of varieties we plant with the sewer line being in there. Oslund: But if we move the sanitary lines over closer to one edge of the easement they have a 20 foot easement. MacCoy: It is already in. Oslund: Well then describe the easement in such a way that you have enough room to put in some landscaping. Just saying that there are many ways to do it. You have a line out there establish your line put your 20 foot easement or 30 foot easement on it and use that as a common easement of landscaping and a sanitary easement. It is not often that you have to maintain a sanitary line or dig it up. But the plantings could be in such a way that • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 13 if it was needed to be dug up it wouldn't destroy the landsca n'og oing to screen that much the fence wouldn't be that big of a deal a six foot fence 9 anyway. Johnson: That fence is 8 foot tall, because we put 7 foot 7 inch panels on it and it didn't reach to the ground. Shearer: I think it would be adequate if we require them to scrdeantltscaeenyt and I would not ever, not the entire thing. they would have a storage yar think they would want to keep the rest of their project attractive or a commercial use. MacCoy: Then you have a checker board affair. Shearer: Well you are talking if you have d u 9 hei~ forage yards o tt o the s de a d whatever it is that could be slatted or they soul p fence them and screen them with landscaping. MacCoy: And then looking down the road if you get a cl the frodm now or maybe yearsfrohm slatting and they don't slat it he II lose out a few mon now. Shearer: That would be part of the, could be made part of the plat when they buy the property to be committed to that. MacCoy: Well the reason I give it back to Becky to give back to the client. Johnson: I would like to hear a couple of comment o r ou haverac omment regard ng that designed and also those 50 foot wide culdesacs, d y Shari? It is different then what was proposed initially. es: Chairman Johnson and Commissioners they have revised the plat so icon em was Stil foot radius on the culdesac, they have left fhb cause we don't kOnow what the uses will be. this would not be wide enough particularly 40 foot is less than has even been approved on private residential drive ways. I guess that will be up to the commissioners and could whethe rivate streetsobut I would bketovsee streets. I wouldn't have any problem with them being P them developed to an ACRD standard. When they blots t makes it very d ff cutlfor them, and they they later want to go in and reconfigure the it is very time consuming to go through the City and Ads n nunbuuH 9 h nk iD hould be tt ea vacate those streets. So I can understand that rea 9 commercial standard. • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 14 MacCoy: What is our requirement for fire trucks? We don't have one? " Bowcutt: A 50 foot radius is what they have always indicated to me. MacCoy: Yes that is true for the 50 foot but I was thinking for the length of the street? Bowcutt: Uniform Fire Code requires a travel surface minimum of 20 feet. That is when they are talking. drive ways. MacCoy: I was wondering what we require the City. Smith: Commissioner, I am not sure in the commercal zone, itbsdivis ons.e believe the asOt foot right of ways m our commercial subdivisions, industrial su phase of Winston Moore's project on the north side of Franklin Road basically across the street from this one they had 50 foot right of ways plu eae Wen to a 50 foot wide street side of the first phase. On the second phase they I b I don't recall a diameter on the culdesac. I feel that this 40 foot width for a commercial subdivision is with the addition according to the letter from Stan McHutchinson of the no parking signs along the sides of the street. That is a problem in my mind because we still have an enforcement issue to deal with. It is a private street, who enforces it, I don't know that the City police are in the position to enforce that. If they don't who is going to. So I think there is a problem with the 40 foot private street in the commercial subdivision. I have another comment that I would like to make concerning this sewer easement. First of all I want to make it a matter of record that I appreciate in the past dealing with the Hon brothers. They have always been receptive to granting easements for the C'ec ated that n for extension of sewer and water line across their property. We have app the past and I wanted everyone to know that we have appreciated it. The second issue though that I have right now with sewer lines in easements is their accessibility. Even though as Commissioner Oslund mentioned you don't have to very often get into a sewer line. This sewer line serves a large area. It serves all of Meridian Greens, it serves all of Sportsman Pointe, it serves Salmon Rapids, Los Alamitos, the Playground, it is a big service area. I don't want to put our maintenance people in a position of having to cut gates, cut chains, whatever it takes to get to a sewer line that needs maintenance. As it exists right now it is fairly accessible because nothing is there except an open field. When we have got lot lines every 250 feet then we have a fence to deal with. I would like to have the applicant or their engineering people devise some way that will guarantee the City maintenance people access to that line at any time for maintenance purposes. I have been a stickler on it on other subdivisions on residential subdivisions in particular because the lots are a lot smaller in those cases. Right now 1 am dealing with a situation in a residential subdivision where the developer { e91 b~o~ht the lots are facedswith a s tuation supposed to be constructed. The people 9 • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 Page 15 that they didn't know anything about and now we have an easement that is not fenced off as it was supposed to be and we are going to be faced with people on those lots making improvements that we don't have any control over. Although there will be some because the easement language is being written to allow us some control. But it just becomes more of a headache to maintain the line when you have to deal with. 6 or 7 property owners along here as opposed to having access and perhaps what we need to do is move the fence over so the sewer line is in the park I don't know. But, I would really like to see something proposed- negotiated, whatever the word is so we have access to that sewer line. I guess that is all I have to say. Johnson: Okay Gary thank you, any questions for staff before we move on? Any further questions for Becky? Does Becky have any further comments at this time, or would you like to reserve those in the event that there is other testimony? Bowcutt: I don't have any further questions. Johnson: Okay, this is a public hearing is there anyone else that would like to address the Commission on this application at this time? Seeing no one then I will close the public hearing. (End of Tape) Okay, you have heard the testimony, what is your recommendation, Commissioners, what would you like to do? Certainly you would like to do something right? Hepper: Something, we just don't know how to put it. Johnson: Who wants to take a stab at it? Hepper: Well we are wondering if we should table this until Becky has a chance to confer with her client about some possible alternatives or if she would want us to give her some alternatives or choose one and see if she can live with it. I am not really sure the best way to handle this. Johnson: It is really up to you, I personally didn't have an opportunity to review her memo that was submitted today because it came in so late. Shearer: I move we approve the preliminary plat with the requirements of screening for storage areas included in the covenants and that the owner work out an agreeable agreement with the City Engineer on sewer access. MacCoy: Second Johnson: We have a motion by Commissioner Shearer and second by Malcolm MacCoy Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission May 14, 1996 . Page 16 all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION FAILED: 2 Yea, 2 Nay, Chairman breaks tie -Nay Johnson: Is there another motion? Oslund: I move that we recommend to the City.Council, or that we approve the preliminary plat with the following, addition that being including a landscaped easement between the development and Storey park for the entire perimeter of the application. Johnson: Motion dies for lack of a second. Is there another motion that someone would like to make. Is there any further discussion at this point. I didn't have a whole lot of problem with the first motion with the exception that the streets weren't addressed and that seemed to be a concern of staff. Shearer: Fifty foot easement rather than a 40? Johnson: Well I think some things need to be worked out with staff, I don't care how you phrase it, you can phase it however you want. Hepper: l move that we recommend approval to the City Council with the stipulation that a landscape buffer fora 8 foot fence be constructed along the perimeter north of the westside of the City park, that property line adjoining those two sides of the City park, the east side of the City park. Also that access to the sewer be negotiated with the applicant to the staffs satisfaction and also that the width of the streets be negotiated with the City staff. MacCoy: Second Johnson: We have a motion and a second, any other discussion regarding the motion? Shearer: I think we are developing a lot of fences that is going to be hard to do anything with. Johnson: Any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: 3 Yea, 1 Nay ITEM #7: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A CHILD CARE CENTER BY JERRY COBLER: • • MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: MAY 14.1996 APPLICANT: WILLIAM HON AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 6 REQUEST; PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HONOR PARK N0.3 SUBDMSION AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: ~~Ii~~LTiL~~~~ OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian.