The URL can be used to link to this page

Dove Meadows Sub No. 2 VAROFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY GOUNGIL MEf~"B R A Good Place to Live WALT W. MORROW, President CITY OF MERIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA EE C N GLENN R. gE TLEy 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 P & Z COMMISSION Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 JIM JOHNSON Chairman Public WorksBuilding Departme~ (208) 887-2211 , TIM HEPPER Motor Vehicle/Driver; License (208) 888-4443 JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND ROBERT D. CORRIE MALCOLM MACCOY Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Halt, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 12 , 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 2/27/96 HEARING DATE: 3/19 /96 REQUEST: Variance for Dove Meadows Subdivision No 2 BY: Dave Leader LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT:- Prooosed Lots 3 ~ 4, Block 3 of Dove Meadows No. 2 Subdivision _ ___ _-_--- --- _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __.__ - ___ _ JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z GREG OSLUND, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR -RONALD TOLSMA, C/C -CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C -WALT MORROW, C/C -GLENN BENTLEY, C/C -WATER DEPARTMENT -SEWER DEPARTMENT -BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT -POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER -CITY PLANNER MERIDfAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: FE ~ 2 7 1986 CITY OF ~iE~ID1AN • CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, ID 83642 - ~, VARIANCE APPLICATION (RE: Meridian Zoning Ordinance} NAME: Dave Leader Phone: 344-8200 (Owner or holder of valid option) ADDRESS: 110 Parkway Drive Boise, Idaho 83706 GENERAL LOCATION: SW'/4 Section 5~ T 3 N, R 1 E LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY:Proposed Lots 3 & 4 Block 3, Dove Meadows #2 PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OR VALID OPTION: A copy of your property deed or option agreement must be attached. PRESENT ZONE CLASSIFICATION: R-8 VICINITY SKETCH: A vicinity map and/or site plan at a scale approved by the City showing property lines, streets existing and proposed zoning and such other items as the City may require. SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS: A list of all property owners and addresses within, contiguous to, directly across the street from, and within a 300' radius of the parcel(s) proposed for a variance must be attached. (This information is available from the County Assessor.) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED VARIANCE: Reduction of street frontage from sixty-five feet ~~5'~to fifty feet 50') for Lot 3 and fifty- ~r feet~,54'1 for lot 4 Date Received City Council Hearing Date Received by CITY COt1NCIL• RF(''nR S LEY'S LAND 109 South 4'" t Boise, Idaho 8302 URVEYING (3e5-os3s Fax (208) 385-0696 February 5, 1996 Meridian City Council 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Variance Request -Street Frontage Lots 3 and 4, Block 3, Dove Meadows Subdivision #2 Dear Members of the Council: This application by Dave Leader is seeking approval of the street frontage requirements of Section 2-410A of the Meridian City Code. This section requires sixty-five feet (65') of street frontage for lots in the R-8 Zone. Mr. Leader is obtaining approval for Dove Meadows Subdivision #2. However, because of the location of Lot 3 and Lot 4 in Block 3 of the proposed development, the lots are unable to meet the minimum street frontage. Lots 3 and 4 in Block 3 are located on a curve. Due to the direction of the curve, the location of the existing street, and the boundary of Dove Meadows Subdivision #1, the lots are configured with fifty feet (50'} of street frontage for Lot 3 and fifty-four feet (54') of street frontage for Lot 4. Both lots are considerably larger than the 6 000 square feet required by the R-8 Zone. Lot 3 is 8,594 square feet in size. Lot 4 is 9,062 square feet in size. Section 2-419 of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance provides the Council authority to grant variance requests. Subsection A are the General requirements for a variance. Subsection B states the application and standards for variances. Subsection C states the Findings of Fact that must be made. Subsection C states: A variance shall not be granted unless (as a result of a public hearing the Council makes a statement of supportive reasons based directly on the evidence presented to it which supports conclusions that the mentioned standards and conditions of this Ordinance have been met by the applicant and unless ald of the following exist: 1. That there are such special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that the strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would clearly be impracticable or unreasonable; Dove Meadows Subdivision #2 Project 1165-2 - 1 - 2. That strict compliance with the requirements of this Ordinance would result in extraordinary hardship to the owner, subdivider or developer because of unusual topography, the nature of condition of adjacent development, other physical conditions or other conditions that make strict compliance with this Ordinance unreasonable under the circumstances, or that the conditions and requirements of this Ordinance will result in inhibiting the achievements or the objectives of this Ordinance; 3. That the granting of the specified variance will not be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the property is situated; 4. That such variance will not have the effect of altering the interest and purpose of this Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Regarding these findings of fact, the location of the boundary of Dove Meadows Subdivision # 1 forms the southern lot line of Lot #3. This is boundary was fixed with the recording of Dove Meadows Subdivision #l. The curvature of the street was also determined with the recording of Dove Meadows Subdivision # 1. This curve affects the amount of land that is available for street frontage for Lots 3 and 4. Lots 3 and 4 are oversized for the zone in which they aze found. The increased size partly compensates for the reduced street frontage. Strict enforcement of the street frontage requirements for these two lots is unreasonable given the issues presented. Granting the variance request for reduction of the street frontage will not affect other properties in the area; nor would the reduction of street frontage cause injury to other properties. This request will not alter or affect the interest and purpose of the Ordinance especially considering the size of the lots affected. In summary, Dave Leader is requesting a variance from the minimum street frontage requirement of the R-8 Zone. The request is to allow a street frontage reduction from sixty-five feet (65') to fifty feet (50') for Lot 3 and to fifty-four feet {54') for Lot 4. The reason for the valiance is the location of an existing subdivision boundary and the curvature of the street. Although the street frontage is reduced, the lots aze considerable lazger than allowed by the R-8 Zone. Lot 3 is 8,594 square feet in size; Lot 4 is 9,062 square feet in size. Reconfiguration of these lots would only result in abnormally sized lots in an area where the typical lot size is approximately 6,000 square feet. Dove Meadows Subdivision #2 Project 1165-2 - 2 - -..J • Based on the information stated above, we ask that the Council approve this variance request. As stated, it affects only the street frontage of Lot 3 and Lot 4 in Block 3 of Dove Meadows Subdivision #2. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Respectfully, Patrick A. Tealey B : /.~sC Ted Hutchinson Dove Meadows Subdivision #2 Project 116s-2 - 3 - U ' rv N ~ _^c..~_c~ r~, = - :I ,h s ~ I r - -~~ • ~ _ ~~ _ _` .__ __ T ~ M1 ~ i /~J ~ 1 -~ 1 r ~ , • ...... `~o ~ _ I N 1 ~ W _ ~ pp~~{ A ~^~~- I ~ ' ~ U. ~ ~ ' m N ~ ~.- .^' i r A c D ~ ~ ~` .. a c d z ' F ~ ¢ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ' MN ~O N `(•• ' ~ CCU = .l IN f C'!' ~ Of + N DFVUr, f v , ~ a r m~) S I O I • ~ - ~ • ~~ W N _ ( < N M~NGATE PL, o w o a 1 w 1 I I C N WIN aTE n.C I ~~ y~1t7GATE N ~: ~ ~. ,. ~~~~~~~~r-~~~• ~> G C~ ~' r~ ~ -~ r ~~ :. ~' ..L _~_.. -- ~ V '~ ~ S. L Ci ~ L ~ i ' _~ ~~ ~ ~ 1 (:- i r l ~ = '`~ . . ~ -/ -, ' ~ ~ ~~ -~ _. /\ !ti ~ ~/ t i /~ I y '`~ WILLIAM G. BF_RG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney ~ HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live WALT W. MORROW, President CITY OF MERIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA E C R G ENN R. BENTLEY 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 P & Z COMMISSION Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 JIM JOHNSON, Chairman Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 TIM HEPPER Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND ROBERT D. CORRIE MALCOLM MACCOY Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 12 , 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 2/27/96 HEARING DATE:- 3/19 /96 REQUEST: Variance for Dove Meadows Subdivision No 2 BY: Dave Leader LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Proposed Lots 3 ~ 4, Block 3 of Dove Meadows No. 2 Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P2 MALCOLM MACCOY, P2 JIM SHEARER, P/Z -GREG OSLUND, P/Z -TIM HEPPER, P/Z -ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR -RONALD TOLSMA, C/C -CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C -WALT MORROW, C/C -GLENN BENTLEY, C/C -WATER DEPARTMENT -SEWER DEPARTMENT -BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT -POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ~3s~.gz CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, ID 83642 ~'ARRIANCE A,~P,~,ICATION (RE: Meridian Zoning Ordinance) NAME:__Dave Leader Phone: 344-800 (Owner or holder of valid option) ADDRESS: .110 Parkway Drive Boi e~ I ho ~,~6 GENERAL LOCATION: SWl/< tion , T. 3 N * R 1 E LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY:. Propo,ed Lois 3 & 4 B~o~ ~,, Dove eAAnw~ #2 PROOF OF OWNERS O~y iA~,iD gPT1O~: A copy of your property deed or option agreement must be attached. PRESENT ZONE CLASSIFICATION: R-8 VICINITY SKETCH: A vicinity map and/or site plan at a scale approved by the City showing property lines, streets existing and proposed zoning and such other items as the City may require. SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWIV~RS: A list of all property owners and addresses within, contiguous to, directly across the street from, and within a 3p0' radius of the parcel(s) proposed for a variance must be attached. (This information is available from the County Assessor.) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED VARIANCE: Reduction of sir fronl.~ge from ~~ five fe;~; LGS'1 to fifty feet (SO'1 for t 3 and fi -f ur feet (,54'1 for ~~ Date Received Received by T~1LEY'S LAND cos South a~ st, Boise, Idaho 83702 SURVEYING (208) 385-os3s Fax (208) 385-OS9s February 5, 1996 Meridian City Council 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Variance Request -Street Frontage Lots 3 and 4, Block 3, Dove Meadows Subdivision #2 Dear Members of the Council: This application by Dave Leader is seeking approval of the street frontage requirements of Section 2-410A of the Meridian City Code. This section requires sixty-five feet (65') of street frontage for lots in the R»8 Zone. Mr. Leader is obtaining approval for Dove Meadows Subdivision #2. However, because of the location of Lot 3 and Lat 4 in Block 3 of the proposed development, the lots are unable to meet the minimum street frontage. Lots 3 and 4 in Block 3 are located on a curve. Due to the direction of the curve, the location of the existing street, and the boundary of Dove Meadows Subdivision #1, the lots are configured with fifty feet (50') of street frontage for Lot 3 and fifty-four feet (54') of street frontage for Lot 4. Both lots are considerably larger than the 6,000 square feet required by the R-8 Zone. Lot 3 is 8,594 square feet in size. Lot 4 is 9,062 square feet in size. Section 2-419 of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance provides the Council authority to grant variance requests. Subsection A are the General requirements for a variance. Subsection B states the application and standards for variances. Subsection C states the Findings of Fact that must be made. Subsection C states: A variance shall not be granted unless (as a result of a public hearing the Council makes a statement of supportive reasons based directly on the evidence presented to it which supports conclusions that the mentioned standards and conditions of this Ordinance have been met by the applicant and unless all of the following exist: 1. That there gre such special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that the strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would clearly be impracticable or unreasonable; Dove Meadows Subdivision #2 Projec* 1165-2 _ 1 - 2. That strict compliance with the requirements of this Ordinance would result in extraordinary hardship to the owner, subdivider or developer because of unusual topography, the nature of condition of adjacent development, other physical conditions or other conditions that make strict compliance with this Ordinance unreasonable under the circumstances, or that the conditions and requirements of this Ordinance will result in inhibiting the achievements or the objectives of this Ordinance; 3. Thant the granting of the specified variance will not be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the property is situated; 4. That such variance will not have the effect of altering the interest and purpose of this Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Regarding these findings of fact, the location of the boundary of Dove Meadows Subdivision # 1 forms the southern lot line of Lot #3. This is boundary was fixed with the recording of Dove Meadows Subdivision # 1. The curvature of the street was also determined with the recording of Dove Meadows Subdivision #1. This curve affects the amount of land that is available for street frontage for Lots 3 and 4. Lots 3 and 4 are oversized for the zone in which they are found. The increased size partly compensates for the reduced street frontage. Strict enforcement of the street frontage requirements for these two lots is unreasonable given the issues presented. Crranting the variance request for reduction of the street frontage will not affect other properties in the area; nor would the reduction of street frontage cause injury to other properties. This request will not alter or affect the interest and purpose of the Ordinance especially considering the size of the lots affected. In summary, Dave Leader is requesting a variance from the minimum street frontage requirement of the R-8 Zone. The request is to allow a street frontage reduction from sixty-five feet (65') to .fifty feet (50') for Lot 3 and to fifty-four feet (54'} for Lot 4. The reason for the variance is the location of an existing subdivision boundary and the curvature of the street. Although the street frontage is reduced, the lots are considerable larger than allowed by the R-8 Zone. Lot 3 is 8,594 square feet in size; Lot 4 is 9,062 square feet in size. Reconfiguration of these lots would only result in abnormally sized lots in an area where the typical lot size is approximately b,000 square feet. Dove Meadows Subdivision #2 Project 1165-2 _ 2 _ • Based on the information stated above, we ask that the Council approve this variance request. As stated, it affects only the street frontage of Lot 3 and Lot 4 in Block 3 of Dove Meadows Subdivision #2. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Respectfully, Patrick A. Tealey B : /.~sC Ted Hutchinson Dove Meadows Subdivision #2 Project 116s-z - 3 - Tl~LE Y' S LAND ~ os South a~ str~ Boise, Idaho e3~o2 SURVEY 1 N G (208) 385-0636 Fax (208) 385-0696 Project No.: 1165-2 Date: December 14, 1995 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DOVE MEADOWS SUBDIVISION No. 2 A parcel of land being portions of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 and the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 5, T.3N., R.lE., B.M., Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a brass cap marking the Southeast corner of the said Section 5; thence along the Southerly boundary of the said Section 5 North 89°48'53" West 2644.18 feet to a brass cap marking the South 1/4 corner of said Section 5; thence along the North-South center of section line of said Section 5 North 00°27'15" East 1312.52 feet to a brass cap marking the Northwest corner of the said SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said Section 5, said point also being the INITIAL POINT; thence along the North boundary of the said SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 South 89°44'36" East 550.14 feet to an iron pin; thence leaving the said North boundary South 00°27'36" West 219.97 feet to an iron pin; thence South 45°52'44" West 150.00 feet to an iron pin marking the Northeast corner of Dove Meadows Subdivision No. 1 as on file in Book 65 of Plats at Pages 6662 through 6664 in the Office of the Ada County Recorder, Boise, Idaho; thence along the Northerly boundary of said Dove Meadows Subdivision No. 1 North 83°57'58" West 334.91 feet to an iron pin; thence continuing North 80°00'49" West 144.04 feet to an iron pin; thence continuing South 83°10'57" West 65.99 feet to an iron pin; thence continuing North 82°25'13" West 71.00 feet to an iron pin; thence continuing South 80°41'46" West 115.62 feet to an iron pin; thence continuing South 85°46'35" West 229.84 feet to an iron pin; thence continuing North 81°05'39" West 198.80 feet to an iron pin; thence continuing South 31°53°42" West 109.75 feet to an iron pin marking a point of beginning of curve; thence continuing Northwesterly 105.34 feet along the arc of a curve to the right having a central angle of 12°42'23", a radius of 475.00 feet and a long chord bearing North 53°48'28" West 105.12 feet to an iron pin marking a point of ending of curve; thence continuing South 57°26'46" West 51.57 feet to an iron pin ; thence continuing South 34°24'09" West 100.55 feet to an iron pin; thence continuing South 30°11'35" West 104.03 feet to an iron pin; thence continuing South 03°34'04" East 60.14 feet to an iron pin; thence continuing South 30°11'35" West 100.00 feet to an iron pin; thence leaving the ~ ~ TEALEY'8 LAND SIIRVEYING 109 S. 4'" STREET, BOISE, IDAHO 83702 * (208) 385-0636 Project No.: 1165-2 Date: December 14, 1995 PROPOSED DOVE MEADOWS No. 2 PAGE 2 said Northerly boundary of Dove Meadows Subdivision No. 1 North 59°48'25" West 322.08 feet to an iron pin on the West boundary of the said SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4; thence along the said West boundary North 00°27'07" East 490.55 feet to an iron pin marking the Northwest corner of the said SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4; thence along the North boundary of the said SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 South 89°48'45" East 1326.32 feet to the INITIAL POINT. Said parcel of land contains 17.55 acres, more or less. ,i _.~~.~ - ~ a tfc 1 5 ' t{ -~/ <~ i i ~ •,,, PIONEER TITLE COMPANY ~ i~G~*-+" . CJ:~ 1~ a• ~~ OF ADA COUNTY ~ • I~ i a 821 West State Street /Boise, Idaho 83702 ~_ (208) 336-6700 } 3 '9`I JUN 3 f'i'g ' :_~= 888 North Colc Road /Boise, Idaho 83704 FEE ~jB.U..._. (208) 377-2700 . , , ~ 7 O F SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDING DATA -•,~.,.:.,::v.su::u.;~1~;u,u::a;o,~o~~~?Ul',00.711A~A~A~.A~.r.OS1A4 ~~ ~>Q;O~>~?~1~IGTT?G«u~4?Cd?U~.1D~.?L~?~l~>U~?GA~S'~1~>ll~?u~dvS3i,~1; ~~ ~= f ~~ QUITCLAIM DEED ~s M1~ F'OR VALUE RECEIVED MARY LEADER, wife of Grantee ~~ ^~ do hereby convey, release, remise and forever quitclaim ,S `~ unto DAVID E. LEADER, husband of Grantor, as his sole and `~1 separate property ~' 1~, whose address is: 110 Parkway, Boise, Idaho 83706 ~. ~~ the following described premises, to wit: ~• +~, See attached Exhibit "A" which by this reference becomes a part hereto. ~~ ~~ 'j ..:•:.r r.:. 'fir s '.'d I... h~ ~~ ,,.,., together with their appunenances. ~ ;~ ~ ~~ Dated: June 1 , 1994 s%~ ~~~ ~ zy w=;, ary Leader ~; .,Y~ : S A,; ~S 11111111/, ll~~ ,~ - • 5 STATE OP _ 7 rl ~ 110 ~~~~ C ~wtf 1~•4• 'f. , ss. t~ ~~ t`~, On this 3rd y~ ~`• ~iOT~N; t"~ S 9 inthc ear of 1994 Z; Lin P. Iiasura da =~:.1,~n~. ~ ' ~- y ,bcforcmc s ^~ ~ ~--6-~--`c ~ -a ` , a notary puhlic, t -` ~ ^~ pcrsonallyappcarcd, _ Mary Le adQ-9~. 2; ^; known or identified to me to be the rson s us L"yin (. )_~• is ~ Z~ ~ ' pc (~'~ ~ ' • -i ~bj ~~---- subscrihcd to the within ~_; ^j instnnncnt, and acknowlttlged to me that ~i~~;iYC ~bRt,,Q1~1 tll~sl~mc. " ~; AA 1111 ~ ~ '~ ` ~'"~nnn1111111 2 ~` ~ Notary Public: ~"-,./ ~~ ~='~c. _a.! r._ 1~~. •1 .~ . RrsidinFUU:___Moc'J.dlntt -- __--._ t; t 5 i 't0 '(111(1 __ .. i. F• s ti htyC'nnmutisionltPirc>: ~, ~ _ • ~. ~~ /~rnC~ F 1 ~~- --- i ~'; _. e i r a i t _; 9 .i ~:;1 '~ z k ~ ~,, n y :;1i r`~ a ~:, ~• tl ,, 3 ?' i ~, ' 1 ~ a a ,r - , Ch11I11IT "A"' pEOCni rT~orLFOg D_D1'F 1H LJLDO}Lil__FJi)1P~ z ~11.~Lnci1 P_JiOPEIj~j( A parcel of land being a portion o[ the S4 1/A of the .^,g 1/q of Section 5, 1'.7N., n.lE., D.N., Meridian, Ada County, Idnho and more particularly dascribed as follows: ^oclaoni rq at a brans cap marking lho Sout•Iraasl• comer ol: ~•ho caid .,, t•henco Hive .section 5 9 Cho Sout•hnrly boundary oC I:he nal~' North 09•AO'S7" West 1775.02 Leot tv.a point; thr_nco 1lorth OD°2A'A5" East AG.90 feel• to a point on l-ho Northerly right-of-way lino of Fairview Avenuo, alro said point being tha lt_EnL_j',OIt~~p DEGI111t~N0; thence along tha said Northerly right-oL- way line of Fairview 1lvonue North 09.75'15" West 70.01 Ceat to a point; thence beglnntingiroLDc~rve;,'thenco long a urvoptortho,laftgA7,AOlnt o[ raid curvo Iravinq a central angle of 90.72.26", a radluo oL 70c00 feet and a long chord bearing Jtorth A5.00.72^ Eart A2.G7 [eet to a point oL compound curve; thence along a curve to the .laCt 165,77 feet, said curve Iravinq a central angle of 67.10'17", a radius of 150.00 feet orrd o long chord bearing Morth 71•AG'A9" West 157.A7 feet to a point oC ending oL curve; thence North 67.25'50" Hest 125.75 Cael' to a point of begLmin9 of curve; thence along a curve to the right 90.A1 feet, caid curvo having a central anglo of 2A•AO'05", a radius of 210.00 foel• and long chord bearing Jtorth 51.05.56" West 09.72 feet to a point of ending of curvo; thence North JO •A 5.57" West 192.06 Ceet to a point of beginning oC curve; thence along a curve to the left 2A1.27 feet, caid curve leaving a central angle of 77.21'A2", a radius of 77V.V0 feeC and o long •clrorcl bearing Ttorth 57.2G'AA" West 277.02 feet to a point of ending of curve; tlrenco North 7G°07'75^ West 107.07. feet to a point; lhn_noe South A]•21'JO" 4test 257. G0 feet to a point on the Westerly boundary oC the raid SW 1/A oL the SE 1/A of Sect•Son 5; thence along the said Westerly boundary of the said SW 1/A of the SE 1/A of Section 5 north 00°27'76" East 596.17 feet to a point; thence South 00°OD'A9" East 111.77 feot to n point; thence South U7°57'50" F•.ast 774,81 feat to a point; thence ^•out-h li•59'5A" Weat 757.00 feet to a point marklnq a point of beginning o[ curve; thence nlong a curvo to the right t97.AG feet, caid curve having a central angle o[ 26.10'77", a radius oL 470.00 feet and n long chord bearing South 51.55.12" East 195.77 teat to a point of ondLrq of curvo^ thenco .,oath 70°A5'SJ" Ji:.af 192.06 fret to n point marklnq a point oL l~cyirrrrirrq of curve; tlrr_n;n along a curve to the left GA.50 Leot raid curvo having central angle of 2A •AO'05", a radius of 150.00 Leet and a long chord bearing South 51.05.56" Eact G4. a0 feet l-o a point of ending of curve; thence South 67.25'50" East 1~7.G7 feet to a point of beginning oL curvo; t)rence along a cuz,e to the right 22A.AJ. feet, said curve having a cr_ntra.l angle of G1.17'AG", a radius of 210.00 foot and n lung chord br_aring Svulh 72.•A9'o5" Tiast 217.x19 tent to a point markLrg a point- of feel'~urald curve twin aL•hence along a curve to the loft A5.75 70.00 Le 9 central angle oL 07.27'07", a radius of oL• and a long chord bearing South 45"57'A4" East A1.A5 foot to a point rf ending of curve; thence Svul•h UU°2A'45" Wert 7.00 f.cet to a point on Lhe raid trorthcr.ly right'-vt-way line of Pal.rvlew Avenuo; L-henco along the ^.aid ttorlherly right-of.-way line of Fairview Avanua North 09.75'15^ Yteat- 69.75 Cer_[ tv the. SO~.tt'r of b_".~IJit~illD, r.ald p•5rcol of, laml conlrrlns 5.25 serer:, mnr0 yr ler.r. . ~~~\lA!.1.1~1~ nv~ p~~~.~~; Q 7 ..77 F 1 ^, ~~ 971 i; \\ .~y ,~J , ~ ~. i ~- t, .S 1. .. (~~, '~~1 t. `~ ~. /;='4'` `) \7 t ~ s ~t.%~lr~ ! ~/ ~~~ffe~ WARRANTY DEED a GRANTOR, Capitol Christian Center, Inc., an Idaho corporation, whose curzent address is 306 North 14th St., Boise, Idaho 83702, County of Ada, for good and valuable cons~.deration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, barv~in sell and convey unto David E. Leader and Mary Leader, husband and wife, as GRANTEE, and to grantee's successors and assigns forever, all of the following described real estate located in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference in.:orporated herein. TOGETHER with all improvements, water, water rights, ditches, ditch rights, easements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto. SUBJECT T0: Easements, covenants, taxes due and accruing for the year 1994, restrictions and zoning regulations as appear of record or by use upon premises. GRANTEE'S ADDRESS: 110 Parkway Drive, Boise, ID 83706. Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns does hereby covenant, warranty and shall defend the quiet and peaceful possession of said premises by the grantee, their successors and assigns forever against the lawful claims of all persons. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Capitol Christian Center, Inc., through its duly authorized agent, has hereunto subscribed its name to this Warranty Deed this ~~ day of ~g~, 1994. CAPITOL CHRISTIAN CENTER, INC. By: ,~ , Ken th G. i e ~^~ President ~.- STATE OF IDAHO ) ~. - )ss. `1 ,: COUNTY OF ADA ) t . I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized to take acknowledgments, personally appeared Kenneth G. Wilde, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and further known to me or shown to me °',I~ to be the President of Capitol Christian Center, Inc., and acknowledged to me that he executed this instrument on behalf of said Capitc'_ Christian Center, Inc. ~ WITNESS my hand and official seal in the county and state last aforesaid this +~ ~ ~ 23rd day of May , 1994. ,. ~' ~ '••••urnp.q~~ ., `+~; ~,,OK~Y ~;* ~ Notar ublic "rR ~ •~~ G ~ Resi in at: Mer'd n, Idaho -`;'~ ~*~ PU8~,1 ~ p~ My C scion expir's: 12/22/99 } A 4 '•n,.u,,,~.•.. filO~~FFf; TI?~_r J:1\ i I DUI~C 1':1 1., _ '~~' ~, ,,,~, .,~~ ~ .'} ~~"I "r- M.. , raxlnzT "n" ~.:3i1U(3U153 p£QCRIPTIOti FOIi DO~E~1 EjLDOji D_{'1-L~i_ ~F~~[ CIIURCIl PROPEL]( A parcel of land being a portion of the SW 1/I of the SE 1/4 of Section 5, T.311., R.lE., p°Fi., Heridian, Ada Co.inty, Idaho and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a brass cap marking thr_ Southear:t corner of. the said Section 5; thenco along lho SouL•horly boundary o[ the raid ^,ection 5 NortTt 89°48'53" West 1735.02 feet to a point; thence North 00°24'45" East 46.90 feet to a point on the ?iortiterly right-of-way line of Fairview Avenuo, also said point being tlta ItEjtL POI~I~P DEG~NNINQ; thence along the said Northerly right-of- way ll.ne of Fairview Avenue North 89°35'15" West 70.01 feet to a point; thence North 00.24'45" East 7.00 feet to a point marking a point of beginning of curve; thence along a curve to the left 47.41 feet, said curve having a central angle of 90.32'26", a radius of 30.00 feet and a long chord bearing North 45°08'32" East 42.63 feet to a point of compound curve; thence along a curve to the left 165.73 feet, said curve having a central angle of 63°18'17", a radius of 150.00 feet and a long chord bearing North 31°46'49" West 157.43 feet to a point of ending of curve; thence 17orth 6J°25'58" West 125.75 feet to a point of beginning of curve; theme along a curve to the right 90.41 feet, said curve having a central angle of 24°40'05", a radius of 210.00 feet and long chord bearing North 51°05'56" West 89.72 feet to a point of ending of curve; thence 17orth 38°45'57" West 192.86 feet to a point of beginning of curve; thence along a curve to the left 241.27 feet, said curve having a central angle of 37°21'42", a radius of 370.00 feet and a long chord bearing 17orttt 57°26'44" West 237.02 feet to a point of ending of curve; thence 1~orth 7G°07'35" West 107.02 feet to a point; ttrence South 43°21'38" West 257.68 feet to a point on the Westerly boundary of the said SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 5; thence along the said Westerly boundary of tl,e said SW 1/4 of tl,e SE 1/4 of Section 5 Ttortli 00°27'36" East 596.17 feet to a point; thence South 80°00'49" East 117.37 feet to a point; tt,ence South II3.57'S8" East 374.91 feet to a point; thence South li°59'54" West 757.00 feet to a point marking a point of beginning of curve; thence along a curve to the right 197.46 feet, said curve having a central angle of 26°18'37", a radius of 430.00 feet and a long chord bearing South 51.55'12" East 195.73 felt to a point of ending of curve; thence South 38°45'53" East 192.86 feet to a point marking a point of beginning of curve; thence along a curve to the left 64.58 feet, said curve having central angle of 24°40'05", a radius of 150.00 feet and a long chord bearing South 51°05'56" East 64.08 feet to a point of ending of curve; thence South 63°25'58" East 147.67 feet to a point of beginning of curve; thence along a curve to the right 224.42 feet, said curve having a central angle of 61.17'46", a radius of 210.00 feet and a long chord bearing South 32°49'05" East 213.89 feet to a point marY.ing a point of compound roverse curve; thence along a curve to file left 4,.75 feet, r,~id curve having a central angle of 87.23'03", a radius of 30.OU `eet and a long chord bearing South 45^53'44" East 41.45 feet to a point of ending of curve; thence `;ouch UU"24'45" Wert 7.00 feet to a pcint on the rald Northerly righC-of-way lino of Falrvlew Avenue; thence along the r•~3d Norther]}' r.IgLt-of-way line of Fairview Avenue Borth 89°35'15" west 69.75 feet to tr,e pQiNT O~ DEOINNINa, ::aid l,:~rce] o! 1'.nd contains 5.25 acres, more or leas. , ~~~,1~' 1_1,1, ...`; r ~ ~s ti ~.r; "' 1 ` _" • I, David Leader ,certify that I personally posted a NO77CE ,FOR P B . j~~R,~y~ near the intersection of North Gingko Avenue and East Apricot Way and at the north end of Hickory Way notifying the public that a variance application for reduction of the minimum street frontage for Lots 3 and 4, Block 3, Dave Meadows Subdivision #2 has been submitted to the City Council. This notice was post ~at~less thansne~eek~ or to the public hearitYg. David Leader 110 Parkway Drive Boise, Idaho 83706 -~ -' 1 ~ ~-s..-.. 1 'emu -+1 ~{ ~ Y:._~. =---,~ I 31TE ~ ,..,r ~ ~ -----=-{ l- _ ~ ~ • ~ ~_G ~`-- ~ -- _. ~ ^ __ 1 1 r~ ~ ~ . i ~ i 3` 1 ~~, i. ; ~~ _____!I ---_ ~ ~...._-- ' --i-- s ~.~~ N i .~ i .__... j _:,~ ~_p ~ - . .. .e ~.. .. T-_. _ _r~ ~~ -..; ~... -~ .. 1 ~ ~ .~', ' i .. ~. --- __.. _.______._ _ _ - _.._.__ ..__-. ~. i ~ ... _. ... _ __..`_. .~_..__ - - t , ~ ~ ... . 1 + 1 ~1 ~ 1 ~ ,~ _ '~ ~' ~- I_L ~; ~Y ;. ~- -- _. _ ._ . . i ___ t I-L ~ ' _ i ~ - L. ` ___ -- ~ _..1 __~___..._--- • -~1 -I-L. _.. -~ ---_ _ - -A-D ~. PLAtvNtNC~-A~fJ: - . ~-- - -::.- _ _-_ EC i 4 1~.~5 _ 1 ~ i ~, ~~ ~: 1 ' 1 .~ _ _ _- - __.. .may-..-_-,+-. ~._ __ _ .._ -_~. ~ ~~•• ~f .-.a 1 ~ • PROPERTY OWNERS within 3d0 feet of DOVE MEADOWS SUB #2 VARIANCE REQUEST Parcel # 80619750010, 0060 8c0100 Farcel # 80619750080, &0090 Parcel #89467170040 Fred Meyer,lne. AVEST Limited Partnership Vladmir & Qalina Novak Senior Vice President Corporate Roger H. Allen 2098 N. Wingate Place Facilities 6904 Randolph Dr. Meridian, Idaho 83642 P.O. Box 42121 Boise, Idaho 83709 Portland, OR 97242-0121 Parcel # R9467i 70050 Parcel # 89467170060 Parcel # 89467170070 David 8t Lori Middleton Oenoveva Miyasato Richard & Paulette Meyer 2076 N. Wingate Place 2054 N. Wingate Place 2038 N. Wingate Place Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Parcel #89467170080 Parcel # 89467170090 Parcel # 89467170100 Leroy Younquist Michael a& Mary Markley Darin & Angela Lindig 2022 N. Wingate Place 2015 N. Wittgate Place 2029 N. Wittgate Place Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meri~an, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Parcel # 89467170110 Parcel # R94b7170120 Parcel # 89467170130 Todd 8c Leisa McClintiek Brent 8t Kristin Hadley deck Coon & Heidi Sabin 2047 N, Wingate Pl~e 2069 N. Wingate Place 2355 E. Meadow Woad Dr. Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Parcel # 89467170140 Parcel # 81914250010 Parcel # 81914250()20 Eugene 8c Corinne Hetmer Jerry ~ Donna Sullivan Bogdan & Galina Martaenyuk 2092 N. Devlin Avenue 2567 E. Apricot Court 2593 E. Apricot Court Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridiatt, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Parcel # 81914250030, 0040, 0070, & Parcel # 81914250060 Parcel # 81914250090 0080 David Fc Kelly Nielson Sean & Shanttott Cook David Fi Mary Leader 2646 E. Apricot Court 2580 E. Apricot Court 110 Parkway Drive Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Boise, Idaho 83706 Parcel # 81914250100 Pesreel # 81914250310 Parcel # R,~ 914230320 Donald & Debbie Steinke Randal L. Smith Clinton & Stacy Wall 2558 E. Apricot Court 5251 N. Watetsedge 2518 E. t3rapewood Drive Meridian, Idaho 83642 Boise, Idaho 83703 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Site address: 2534 E. Grapewood Dt. Parcel # 81914250330 Par~eel # 81914250340 Parcel # 81914250350 Eric & Beth Povlsen Robert Batchelor Robert & TitFarty Ririe 2940 E. Grapevvood Drive 2472 E. Grapewood Drive 2454 E. Grapewood Drive Meridian, Idalro 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Parcel # 81914250360 Parcel # 81914250370 Parcel # 81914250380 Scott & Marla Dannelly Kahn Ward David & Anna Sever 2430 E. Grapewood Drive 2416 E. Grapewood Drive 2396 E. Grapewood Drive Meridian, Idaho $3642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Parcel # 81914250390 Parcel # 81914250400 Parcel # 81914250410 David & Doreen Mattson Alan dt Loraine Tisdale Thomas c@ Heather Mefitts 2382 E. Gtapewood Drive 2364 E. trrapewood Drive 2336 E. t3rapewood Drive Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 ~~> . ~'>~ ~ti ~~ • Parcel# 81914250420 Parcel# 81914250430 Parcel# 81914250440 Frank & Lucille Swiger Raymond Bobko Dennis 8c Janice McMann 231.8 E. Grapewood Drive 1836 N. Ginkgo Avenue 2321 E. Apricot Drive Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Site address: 1836 E. Grapewood Drive Parcel # 81914250454 Parcel # 81914250460 Parcel # 81914250470 Derick !~ Amy Gillum Marvin & Sarah Sims Karen Harr 2347 E. Apricot Drive 2363 E. Apricot Drive 2387 E. Apricot Drive Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Parcel # 81914250480 Parcel # 81914250490 Parcel # 81914250500 Robert & Michelle Peterson Allen & Lilian Bingham Robert 8t Tiffany Welch 2403 E. Apricot Drive 2435 E. Apricot Drive 2449 E. Apricot Drive Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Farcel# 81914250510 Parcel# 81914250520 Parcel# 81914250530 Josh ~ Sherri $recks Eric ~t Brandy Toney Donna Nyman 2463 E. Apricot Drive 2485 E. Apricot Drive 2521 E. Apricot Drive Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Parcel # 81914250230 Parcel # 81914250240 Parcel # 81914250250 Micahaei & Mary Lindquist William & Anne Miliensifer Jeffrey & Paula Fisher 2351 E. Grapewood Drive 2327 E. Grapewood Drive 2311 E. Grapewood Drive Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Parcel # 81914250260 Parcel # 819142502270 Parcel # 81914250280 Ruth McCloud Kevin 8t Michelle Austin Nickolas 8t Joann Smith 10635 O'Shetna 2273 E. Grapewood Drive 10242 Petearana Street Eagle River, AK 99577 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Boise, Idaho 83'704 Site address: 2295 E. Grapewood Drivo Site address: 2255 E. Grapewood Drive Parcel # 81914250290 Parcel # 81914250300 Parcel # 81914250540 Teresa Sehiedel & John George Scott c~ Vera Schlofman Kim Wilkerson 2252 E. Grapewood Drive 11333 Camas Street 2512 E. Apricot Drive Meridian, Idaho 83642 Boise, Idaho $3709 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Site address: 1883 N. Ginkgo Avenue Parcel # 81914250550 Parcel # 81914250560 Parcel # 81914250570 Charles Hinkle & Trista Ross-Iiinkle Tom Smith, Sr. Mark .@ Joann Fuller 2472 E. Apricot Drive 2458 E. Apricot Drive 2440 E. Apricot Drive Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Parcel # R19I4250580 Parcel # 81914250590 Parcel # 81914250600 Raymond & Betty Pantaleo Aaron Jones & Kathy Zundei Randal & Jufie Pipal 2414 E. Apricot Drive 2392 E. Apricot Drive 2350 E. Apricot Drive Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Parcel #85747710180 Parcel # RS747710190 Parcel #85747710200 Darnel J. ~ Judy Hardee Rc Craig 8t Marcy Dugget Theodore dt Laurie Roy Daniel R. & Debbie Hardee 2044 N. Applewood Piece 2043 N. Whittier Place 2054 N. Applewood Place Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Parcel #85747710210 Parcel #85747710220 Parcel #85747710230 James ~ L9agella Spagnolletti Edward & Sharon Greene Robert lot Rachel Montgomery 2053 N. Whittier Place 2059 N. Whittier Piece 2062 N. Whittier Plane Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 ~~ • • Parcel #85747710240 Parcel #85747710250 Parcel #85747710260 Lance Ha#field 2056 N. Whittier Place Teary McCarthy 2048 N. Whittier Place Charles & Barbara Wright 2046 N. Whittier Place Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Parcel #85747710370 Parcel #85747710380 Parcel #85747710390 baaiel & Sharon Sears Brendan & Lucille Gardner Allan & Joyce Chandler 1885 E. Oakcrest Drive 1905 E. Oakcrest Drive 1945 E. Oakcrest Drive Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Parcel #85747710400 Parcel #85747710410 Parcel #85747710420 Robert Koga John ~ Davalee Leavitt Wade !~ Nancy Miller 905 5E 136th Avenue Apt, J-5 198$ E. Oakcrest Drive P.O. Box 73 Vancouver, WA 98684-3515 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Boise, Idaho 83729 Sits address: 1965 E. Oakcrest Drive Site address: 2005 E. Oakcrest brave Parcel # S1105315228 Parcel # 51105315226 Parcel # Sl I05346825 8t 346430 Gordon & Margaret Wood P.O. Box 422 Norman dt Donna Barker 19405 Deerwood Drive AVEST Limited Parhiership Roger H. Allen Meridian, Idaho 83642 Volcano, CA 95689.9771 6904 Randolph Ihive Site address: 21 SO N. Dixie Lane Boise, Idaho 83709 Parcel # SI 10534661 S Parcel # 51105346655 Parcel # 51105427900 Westside Bible Chapel Graye Wolfe, Sr. & Timbre Wolfe Edmonds Construction, Inc. & 3018 S. Whitepost 9380 Fairview Avenue Pacific Northwest Electric Inc. Eagle, Idaho 83616 Boise, Idaho 83704 3131 E. Lanark Suite C Site address: 2040 E. Fairview Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Parcel # Sl l OS 43$512 Parcel # S110S 315380 Parcel # 81914250050 Capitol Christian Center, Inc. Phyllis & Richard Akerstrom Mission Media, Inc. P.O. Box 368 2050 N. Dixie Lane P.O. Box 3030 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Boise, Idaho 83703 Site address: 2643 E Apricot NOTICE OF HEARING • NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., on March 19, 1996, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of Dave Leader, for a Variance Application for land located in the SW 1/4, Section 5, T.3N, R.1 E, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is generally located in proposed Lots 3 & 4, Block 3 of Dove Meadows No. 2. The Application requests a Variance for reduction of street frontage from sixty five feet to fifty feet for Lot 3 and fifty four feet for Lot 4. Amore particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Dated this 29th day of February, 1996. -~i~ ~----J~` 7 WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., C LERK •f w J U N. avEST ~r~. _ -- ~' I 4 i 1~ ~a m ' `'~~T.. i\C ~~ ~ . ^ - ' Ff ~. ;-- 1 ~ 1 w ~ N i~ ~ ~ ~ . ~~ r ~~ ~. !` • \' •. ~t~~~~~~~~~• a Q >. O. N p ~ ~ v N ~ U ^+'I ~ a o c~ ~o D - - m ~ o A ~ O W ~ r. !.1 ~ 1 ' ~)~~~_ Jw ~ - ~m ,/ i ri -~ `-. C") r :. _` ~ .G -~_ " ~ __f. I ~ : ~) 1 J~ W ti ~ Z' L+ 1 (~ i? ~ ~ ~~ ; ~~ _~ ~~~ ~ . `.•G.~ ' " .,.. ~/~v%' . ' ~ /~ .' i c a ~ w ---~ _ _ - - - ~(-~ l ~ ~..- t l N1 N L G.;C~i=C'GE ~~~ f -r--- ~ ^ N ti I n ' ~+ • ~~ ~ ~7 i 1 ~ ~. 1 1 W _~ ~ n I A m~~ A i n I 11 U = D tr pi ~ ~ ~ m • ; I r ~t ~ a ~ v ' ~ io ~~ ' f S ~ :c • ~~ ~ N _ . l IN pp4'7' ~' Qt 1 ~ C _ :, v~ - r i A T W i is i ~`v ~ ~' O S I. _ _ U ~ -~ ti I ~ 7`~ W ^' I- c N MiNGATE PL. p N WIN ATE ~+L y, wIrJGATE ~ j N to v a p~'W 1 1 IaOI 4~ y `'•~ Q ~ ~ ., s Meridian City Council April 16, 1996 Page 13 ITEM #6: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VARIANCE REQUEST FOR DOVE MEADOWS N0.2 BY DAVE LEADER: Morrow: Mr. Mayor I would move that we adopt and approve the findings of fact and conclusions. Tolsma: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Tolsma; that we approve the findings of fact and conclusions of law for the variance request .for Dove Meadows No. 2 Subdivision, any further discussion? Roll Call vote ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Bentley -Yea, Rountree -Nay, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: 3 Yea, 1 Nay Corrie: I will entertain a motion for the decision. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that it is deaded that a variance from R-4 street frontage requirements of a 65 feet is hereby granted for Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Phase 2 of Dove Meadows Subdivision. Tolsma: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Tolsma of the decision. Morrow: Let me repeat that for you please, that it is decided that the variance from the R-4 street frontage requirement of 65 feet is hereby granted for lots 3 and 4 of Block 3, Phase 2 of Dove Meadows Subdivision. Corrie: You have heard the motion, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: 3 Yea, 1 Nay ITEM #7: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR DOVE MEADOWS NO.2 SUBDIVISION BY DAVE LEADER; TABLED APRIL 2, 1996: Corrie: Staff have any questions or discussion? Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, I think there are still a couple of items that we wanted to address. One was the designation of the lot for the sewer line on the western boundary. • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: APRIL 16,1996 APPLICANT: DAVE LEADER ITEM NUMBER; 6 8~ 7 REQUEST; FF/CL FOR VARIANCE REQUEST AND A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR DOVE MEADOWS N0.2 SUBDNISION AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: j CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: ~ , " CITY ATTORNEY: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CITY POLICE DEPT: ~' CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION; SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: ~~~,~~P J ~~'- 1~~ ~'I"~~J ~ti ~°'" 4ti ,~ ~~ ~~ OTHER: ~I Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. .' • • BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL APPLICATION OF DAVE LEADER FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE R-4 STREET FRONTAGE REQUIREMENT -0F 65 FEET AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The above entitled variance request having come on for hearing on March 19, 1995, at approximately 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City 8a11, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, Ted Hutchinson appearing for the Applicant, and the City Council having heard and taken oral testimony, the City Council of the City of Meridian makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of the public hearing on the variance was published for two consecutive weeks prior to the scheduled hearing for March 19, 1995, the first publication of which was fifteen (15 days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the March 19, 1995, hearing; that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations. 2. That notice of public hearing is required to be sent to property owners within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the ~, land being considered pursuant to 11-2-416 E., 11-2-419 D., and 11- 9-612 B. l.b. of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that this requirement has been met. 3. That the property is zoned R-8 Residential; that the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-410 A, requires that the street frontage in FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 1 • the R-8 zone for single-family subdivisions be 65 feet. 4. That the Applicant has requested that he be granted a variance from the minimum street frontage requirement for R-8 zoned lots. for Lots 3 and 4, Block 3, of Dove Meadows No. 2 Subdivision, and be allowed to have street frontage of 50.00 feet in Lot 3 and 54.00 feet in Lot 4 in lieu of the required minimum of sixty-five (65) feet of street frontage. 5. That Ted Hutchinson, representing the Applicant, testified as follows: "We are seeking a variance of the street frontage requirements for two lots in the second phase of Dove Meadows No. 2. These lots are located on a curve that affects our ability to provide adequate frontage for these. This is also affected by the street location which was predicated by the platting of Dove Meadows No. 1. The change in the street layout with the development of the Avest property there were some changes in the street layout which would have affected, ultimately, the lay out of Dove Meadows No. 2. These lots exceed the minimum lot size in the R-8 zone and in fact the two lots, one of the lots is 8,594 square feet in size, the other lot is 9,062 square feet in size. This is considerably larger than the 6,500 square feet required by the R-4 [R-8) zone. We are seeking a variance brought down to approximately 50 feet for Lot 3 and to 54 feet for lot 4 on Block 1 of this subdivision proposed. Excuse me that is Block 3 of Dove Meadows No. 2. We believe that with the constraints and the size of the lots that is appropriate for this variance to be approved. The letter that I submitted with the application I outlined the findings that must be made by the Council when they are reviewing. the variance request. In that letter I also tried to address those findings to provide the evidence and the °'! information that you would need to be able to support this variance request. With that I would answer any questions the Council would have at this time." 6. That -the Applicant is the owner of record of the property. 7. That Applicant developed Dove Meadows No. 1 prior to developing Dove Meadows No. 2, which is where these lots that he is FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - page 2 • requesting the variance for are located; that Dove Meadows No. 2 is in the preliminary plat stage of development, which has not yet been approved and was before the City Council on March 19, 1996.. 8. That the Planning and Zoning Administrator, Shari Stiles, commented on the proposed plat of Dove Meadows No. 2 that all lots must have a minimum frontage of 65 feet unless on a cul-de-sac and must have minimum square footage of 6,500 square feet. 9. That Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to the City Engineer, commented on the preliminary plat that the minimum street frontage for Lots 3 and 4, Block 3, and Lots 21 and 29, Block 2, shall be sixty-five (54) feet, measured at the arc for the curved portion, per City Ordinance. 10. That no people appeared at the hearing objecting to the variance application. corrczvsioxs 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met including the mailing of notice of the proposed subdivision to owners of. property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. °' 2. .That the City has authority to grant variances pursuant to Section 11-2-419 of the Zoning Ordinance and pursuant to Section 11-9-612 of the Development Ordinances. 3. That the City Council has judged this application by the guidelines, standards, criteria, and policies contained in the Subdivision and Development Ordinance and upon the record submitted FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 3 ' • •. to it and the things upon which it may take judicial notice. 4. That the Council may -take judicial notice of its own proceedings, those of the Planning and Zoning Commission, governmental statutes, ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and the State. 5. That the following provision of Section 11-2-419 A, of the Zoning Ordinance, is noted which is pertinent to the Application: 11-2-419 A. The Council may authorize in specific cases a variance from the terms of this Ordinance or from the Subdivision and Development Ordinances as will not be contrary to the public interest where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. No non-conforming use of neighboring lands, structures or buildings in the same district and no permitted or non-conforming use of lands, structures or buildings in other districts shall be considered grounds for issuance of a variance. Variances shall be granted only where strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. A variance application does not go to the Commission unless directed by the Council. 7. That the specific requirements regarding a variance that must be evidenced and found by the City Council are as follows: 11-2-419 C. FINDIp(~g ~, A. variance shall not be granted unless (as a result of a public hearing) the Council makes a statement of supportive reasons based directly on the evidence presented to it which supports conclusions that the mentioned standards and conditions of this Ordinance have been met by the applicant and unless all of the following exist:. 1. That there are such special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that the strict FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 4 •. application of the provisions of this Ordinance would clearly be impracticable or unreasonable; 2. That strict compliance with the requirements of this Ordinance would result in extraordinary hardship to the owner, subdivider or developer because of unusual topography, other physical conditions or other conditions which are not self- inflicted, or that these conditions will result in inhibiting the achievements or the objectives of this Ordinance;. 3. That the granting of the specified variance will not be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the property is situated; 4. That such variance will not have the effect of altering the interest and purpose of this Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 8. That there would be a be a specific benefit or profit, economic gain or convenience to the Applicant, if the Application is granted, in that the Applicant would not have to meet the ordinance requirements that other developers of R-8 subdivisions have to meet, particularly in near and adjacent areas. 9. That regarding Section 11-2-419 C it is specifically concluded as follows: a. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that the strict application of the provisions of the set back Ordinance would clearly be unreasonable, in that the lots have more square footage than required for R-8 lots, the °# .requested deviation from the Ordinance is not substantial, and the only Ordinance not being complied with is the R-8 Street frontage requirement and the request pertains only to two lots.- b. That. strict compliance with the requirements of the 65 foot street frontage requirement would result in extraordinary hardship to the applicant. c. That the granting of the specified variance would FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 5 ' • • not be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the property is situated. d. That such variance would not have the effect of altering the interests and purposes of the 65 foot street frontage requirement of the Zoning Ordinance, in that there would be sufficient frontage. 10. That in regard to the first paragraph of 11-2-419 A, which is quoted above, it is specifically noted that it states, in part, as follows: The Council may authorize in specific cases a variance from the terms of this Ordinance or from the Subdivision and Development Ordinances as will not be contrary to the public interest where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. 11. That it is specifically concluded the Application for a variance should be granted because the for only two lots it is concluded that there is sufficient street frontage. 12. The City has in the past granted similar variances as requested by the Applicant but has also denied such variances; each application must stand on its. own merits and the granting of one variance. is not a precedent for granting others. ~, FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 6 • !. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The City Council of the City of Meridian does hereby approve these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL COUNCILMAN MORROW VOTED COUNCILMAN BENTLEY VOTED COUNCILMAN ROUNTREE VOTED D COUNCILMAN TOLSMA ~ VOTED MAYOR CORRIE (TTE BREAKER VOTED DECISION That it is decided the variance from the R-4 street frontage requi~e~~~ f six y-f~ a feet is here y gran ed. APPROVED ,~ , ~~~ (~~--- DISAPPROVED: •, FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 7 Meridian City Council April 2, 1996 Page 7 • Corrie: Can we make a motion on that? There are two issues now, the development agreement and the CC&R's. Morrow: I am prepared to deal with both, my motion would be that we instruct City Attorney Crookston to meet with Mr.. Goldsmith and his representative Mr. McColl to iron out the details of the development agreement and the CC&R's for Salmon Rapids Subdivision. and that we approve both the CC&R's and the development agreement contingent upon the resolution of those details. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #2: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VARIANCE REQUEST FOR DOVE MEADOWS NO.2 SUBDIVISION BY DAVE LEADER: Corrie: Council you have those findings of fact and conclusions of law in front of you, Morrow: Mr. Mayor, having read the findings of fact and conclusions as prepared I am going to offer up some items for discussion. I disagree with the findings of fact and conclusions and will not be willing to support them in their current form. Under findings #1, page four, if there are such special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that the strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would clearly be impractical or unreasonable. I think the issue here is that this certainly does apply with respect to this plat Mr. Leader is asking for on this particular block something like 9 lots two of which have less frontage but more square footage than the typical R-8 lot. That is defined by essentially three stub streets which makes it extremely difFcult that the footage as required by the ordinance (inaudible) one of those 1 believe is lacking 15 feet, one is lacking something like 11 feet. It seems to me that the solution of that on that particular curve if both are (inaudible) 65 feet now we are talking about extraordinarily large lots that are totally out of conformance to the rest of the subdivision. The findings of fact and conclusions as written indicate that this variance should be denied because there are no extraordinary circumstances and I would suggest to you that common sense ought- to prevail here that in a subdivision that is R-8 with essentially the lots of this square footage to require an additional frontage that would make lots fully a third larger than the remainder of the lots in the already approved phases of the subdivision already developed it doesn't seem to me to make very good sense. So I would like to offer that to the Council as maybe we ought to take a second look at this if they so wish. • • Meridian City Council April 2, 1996 Page 8 Rountree: Is that you opinion (inaudible) is to make bigger lots? Morrow: Really it is because you are already limited in terms of stub streets that exist, you are limited in terms of the perimeter, exterior perimeter. You have a phase here that is essentially nine lots. So for single family houses that have been approved in an R-8 district as you look at all of the other lots, the configuration there would be way out of proportion to the other lots. I don't see where they have a lot of choice in terms of trying to meet that frontage requirement on an inside curve. Crookston: Mr. Mayor, the reason that the findings are prepared for the denial. is because what was presented at the hearing and to which the Council can (inaudible) the requirements of the variance ordinance aren't met. What you are saying Mr. Morrow is the lots are larger than the R-8 requirement but they (inaudible) so let's give them a variance. It is not in the ordinance that (inaudible) grant a variance. Morrow: As I read the findings of fact though there are basically four items that the findings talk about with respect to the ordinance and the variance is that correct? Crookston: Yes Morrow: Granted there is not an unusual topography or physical or other conditions that are not self inflicted. But the issue is that by virtue of what is already there with respect to the streets and the stub streets it does create some of those conditions. Crookston: The applicant was the developer of Dove Meadows No. 1, so anything that he has done is of his own infliction. If you are using how the plat lays out in the ordinance requirements (inaudible) support the variance not the (inaudible) self inflicted. Morrow: That would be true but some stub streets that are adjacent properties were required by ACRD and not necessarily of the developers choice. Crookston: That is certainly true. (Inaudible) there is a lot of property to the north that could be used and if the entire property had been platted I don't think that this would be a problem. (Inaudible) Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, 1 would tend to agree with Councilman Morrow, these are the largest lots in the subdivision, if the variance is denied what their likely solution would be is to come in with a culdesac similar to the little bulbs that are shown on the northwest comer and the Southwest corner of the plat. T hose are clearly less than 65 foot frontage but because of the configuration of that little bulb in there or knuckle or whatever you call it those are permitted frontages. I would see that probably their solution would be to come Meridian City Council Apri 12, 1996 Page 9 in with a similar configuration on those lots that will give a little more roadway but will: essentially decrease the size of lots. Rountree: I have a question for Mr. Smith, Gary has (inaudible) been involved? Smith: I believe so, I think that was part of the number one subdivision. Corrie: That is part of phase one. Smith: I believe that the East Apricot Drive Stub and the Grapewood Drive Stub are existing in that configuration. Rountree: And that cross connection has been made? Smith: Gingko yes, I don't remember there being anon-development agreement on that subdivision, it has been so long since 1 have been out there I can't say for certain. I think it has been because the public testimony, one of the gentleman that testified lived on the corner of Gingko and either Apricot or Grapewood, he lived on one of those corner lots, lot 1 or lot 2. Did everyone understand Shari's suggestion on that eyebrow or knuckle situation? It would almost be a direct transposition of what is existing at Meadowglen Avenue and East Grapewood, very similar configuration. We talked before about the requirements on the frontages for these lots on a culdesac radius curve as opposed to a sweeping curve. So that is how the development community side steps the 65 foot frontage on a sweeping curve or an 80 foot frontage if it is an R-4 frontage by installing a knuckle. It effectively puts them into a culdesac status in accordance with the ordinance. It causes them to increase some pavement area and causes some increase in curb and gutter and sidewalk length. I think it does conform to what the ordinance requires. Rountree: If I understand Shari correctly that would not be a preference. Smith: You have one on the corner of East Grapewood and Meadowglen, you have one, it is more of a 90 degree corner at East Clarine and Meadowglenn. It, where you have a decreased frontage like that as Shari mentions to me it does increase your availability of parking, on street parking, gets that parking off of the normal travel way of the street. So that is a positive. Rountree: Without doing the engineering would it be your best judgement that could be done and still maintain the lot size and the additional frontage that was required? Smith: 6500 square feet on lot 3 and 4 with an eyebrow, yes, it is, take a look at lot 20 in phase 2 right there on East Grapewood, that is a 6500 square foot lot and that is the • • Meridian City Council April 2, 1996 Page 10 minimum size just in relationship of the size of those two lots. If you can envision or draw: with a pencil a little eyebrow you are not going to reduce the lot that significantly. I think you would easily have 6500 square feet remaining with an eyebrow. With an eyebrow then it conforms to the culdesac frontage which is 40 feet, 40 foot chord. So with the 54, they would change the lot line location between the two lots nor would they change the side lot line on (inaudible) lot 3 or lot 4 they would just simply change the frontage configuration lot line and make it a 54 foot radius along the front of those two lots with a couple of 20 foot return radiuses ,to get them back to tangent on the street. Maybe, I am not sure whether it is going to overlap, it can't overlap into lot 2 because that is already platted: So they may have to shift it a .little bit to the north to lot 5 but I don't think it would be of any significance. Tolsma: If that eyebrow was put in then the need for a variance is then moot, there is no need for a variance. Smith: That is con-ect, but since they have gone through the process and the findings have been drawn you could I guess you could still adopt the findings as presented but they would just simply have to come back and do what we have been talking about doing and I guess that would be the end of the situation, it would be, if that is your desire, there is an alternative forum and it doesn't appear to be a great economic hardship, it is going to cost them a few square feet of pavement and some additional length in curb and .gutter and sidewalk unless we are overlooking something just sitting here and talking about it. I think that is all. Rountree: Do you find that objectionable? Morrow: Well it seems to me that we are doing an eyebrow and the ultimate cost is really grass and landscaping to the original lot. We would be looking at any eyebrow for the sake of getting around the variance requirement. I don't see any other reason there, I don't see how the public benefits from having the eyebrow it certainly doesn't make trafFic any better, it is on a sweeping curve now, the lots are of sufficient depth there is room for plenty of off street parking, it just seems to me like the dirt ought to stay in the lots as opposed to asphalt. Tolsma: (Inaudible) Morrow: Where are you looking Ron? Tolsma: On the (inaudible) East Grapewood (inaudible) Morrow: Well that is for the 90 degree turn that is not a sweeping turn. • Meridian City Council April 2, 1996 Page 11 Tolsma: It is not a 90 degree it is only 45 degrees. Morrow: Are you talking about this one? Smith: The bottom Morrow: It is a 45 degree turn okay fine. Tolsma: And roughly has the same tum on the other street there. (Inaudible) but the other one they are leaving out and that is (inaudible) Morrow: Do you know that if it is on the sweep, the dimension of Lot 22 might be somewhat less than the or the 45 feet or I'm sorry 50 feet, somewhat less than the 50 feet, that would make it even smaller than the ones that we have here. Tolsma: (Inaudible) sanitary easement through. there also. Rountree: I have a question for Counsel, what is the precedent with the Council's position previously on these? Crookston: Well generally they look to it to see if it is going to be workable and look to the ordinances to see if the variance is going to do harm to those ordinances meaning having the developer meet the requirements of the development meant ultimately it is a question whether or not the developer is asking to have the variance granted for things which the developer has been in control of. The variance is really (inaudible) certain size lot and it meets all of the requirements but you can't get the roadway in just because your roadway or other thing let's say you have some type of sewer line or something like that and just because rock that is there that would be a substantial hardship to be blasted out and (inaudible) that is a topographical problem and that is what our variances are for so you can address those problems. The testimony before the Council for this basically was well I can't do it because of where Avest has placed his property and where the subdivision lines are. But the subdivision lines are all placed by him. In my mind sometimes it is looked too much of a question of or an issue of fact rather than an issue of law. If you have facts that warrant the variance being granted because of the physical problems with the land then a variance is warranted. But if you don't then you are just saying well the lot will look just as good but it won't meet the requirements so we will go ahead and do it and get the variance. Morrow: Mr. Rountree, to partially answer your question, on page 6, item 12 it says the City in the past has granted similar variances requested by the applicant and also have denied such variances. Each application must stand on its own merit and the granting of • • Meridian City Council Apri 12, 1996 Page 12 one variance is not a precedent for granting others. So that would indicate we have . (inaudible). Crookston: I will say this, it is the Council's decision. Tolsma: I tend to agree with Walt down there in one sense that it should be grass rather than asphalt and concrete. The only discrepancy is the eyebrow, the eyebrow is going to really it will make it meet the variance or meet the ordinance but it is really not going to do anything to raise (inaudible) street frontage to make that much difference. Cowie: Are you prepared to make a ruling on the findings of fact and conclusions of law? Morrow: I move that we reject the findings of fact and conclusions of law as written Tolsma: Second Cowie: Moved by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Tolsma that we reject the findings of fact and conclusions of law as written, any further discussion? Rountree: I guess I would say that it seems to me that the way these are written it could go either way based on how you wanted to make the decision. The findings of fact could stand on themselves (inaudible) denied or accepted based on the way it is worded, the way I read it. Crookston: That is pretty much true. Mon-ow: How would you handle item 11 on page 6 where it says it is specifically concluded the application for variance should not be granted because the applicant could design the subdivision so that each lot and particularly these two lots and (inaudible). Rountree: Just simply amend that one item or delete it. Morrow: Or the easy way might be to not adopt these and just instruct for new findings to be written. If there is any other language within these findings of fact it would need to be amended or deleted. Cowie: That is probably the easiest way and also the safest way. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Bentley -Yea, Rountree -Nay, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: 3 Yea, 1 Nay . • Meridian .City Council April 2, 1996 Page 13 Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we instruct the City Attomey to prepare new findings of fact and conclusions. Rountree: Second Cowie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree that new findings of fact and conclusions of law be drawn up by the City Attorney, any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #3: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR DOVE MEADOWS NO.2 SUBDIVISION BY DAVE LEADER; TABLED MARCH 5, 1996: Cowie: So we can table that one until the new findings of fact and conclusions of law. Tolsma: So moved Bentley: Second Cowie: Moved by Mr. Tolsma, second by Mr. Bentley that we table the plat for Dove Meadows No. 2 Subdivision until the next meeting which will be April (End of Tape) ITEM #4: FINDINGS OF FACT. AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VARIANCE REQUEST FOR ASHFORD GREENS SUBDNISION BY BRIGHTON CORPORATION: Come: Council I believe, Counselor is this the one we were discussing? Okay, you have the findings of fact and conclusions for the variance request which is a variance for a variance. Morrow: Correction on page 6, item 8, it is a typo that says John Turnbull it should say David. I have a question on page 13, item 12, wee had talked about the information coming from Nampa Meridian apparently it hasn't come, is that correct Gary? The Nampa Meridian new design for cover ditches with gravel and fencing, we don't have any confirmation from Nampa Meridian on any of that information is that correct? Smith: I haven't seen anything. Morrow: Essentially what these findings of fact do is that they decide not to decide due to the lack of information. t • • c MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING:- __ APRIL 2.1896 APPLICANT: ITEM NUMBER; 2 REQUEST; VARIANCE REQUEST FOR DOVE MEADOWS NO 2 SUBDIVISION AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CITY POLICE DEPT: ' CITY FIRE DEPT: ~ ~ ~~ CITY BUILDING DEPT: ~~ ~ MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: /) ~~ MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ~" ,//\ ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION; SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: ~'~' ~ r AI! Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. u L J BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL APPLICATION OF DAVE LEADER FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE R-4 STREET FRONTAGE REQUIREMENT OF 65 FEET FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The above entitled variance request having come on for hearing on March 19, 1995, at approximately 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, Ted Hutchinson appearing for the Applicant, and the City Council having heard and taken oral testimony, the City Council of the City of Meridian makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of the public hearing on the variance was published for two consecutive weeks prior to the scheduled hearing for March 19, 1995, the first publication of which was fifteen ( 15 ) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the March 19, 1995, hearing; that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations. 2. That notice of public hearing is required to be sent to property owners within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the land being considered pursuant to 11-2-416 E., 11-2-419 D., and 11- 9-612 B. l.b. of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that this requirement has been met. 3. That the property is zoned R-8 Residential; that the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-410 A, requires that the street frontage in FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 1 • the R-8 zone for single-family subdivisions be 65 feet. 4. That the Applicant has requested that he be granted a variance from the minimum street frontage requirement for R-8 zoned lots for Lots 3 and 4, Block 3, of Dove Meadows No. 2 Subdivision, and be allowed to have street frontage of 50.00 feet in Lot 3 and 54.00 feet in Lot 4 in lieu of the required minimum of sixty-five (65) feet of street frontage. 5. That Ted Hutchinson, representing the Applicant, testified as follows: "We are seeking a variance of the street frontage requirements for two lots in the second phase of Dove Meadows No. 2. These lots are located on a curve that affects our ability to provide adequate frontage for these. This is also affected by the street location which was predicated by the platting of Dove Meadows No. 1. The change in the street layout with the development of the Avest property there were some changes in the street layout which would have affected, ultimately, the lay out of Dove Meadows No. 2. These lots exceed the minimum lot size in the R-8 zone and in fact the two lots, one of the lots is 8,594 square feet in size, the other lot is 9,062 square feet in size. This is considerably larger than the 6,500 square feet required by the R-4 [R-8] zone. We are seeking a variance brought down to approximately 50 feet for Lot 3 and to 54 feet for lot 4 on Block 1 of this subdivision proposed. Excuse me that is Block 3 of Dove Meadows No. 2. We believe that with the constraints and the size of the. lots that is appropriate for this variance to be approved. The letter that I submitted with the application I outlined the findings that must be made by the Council when they are reviewing the variance request . In that letter I also tried to address those findings to provide the evidence and the informatioT. that you would need to be able to support this variance request. With that I would answer any questions the Council would have at this time." 6. That the Applicant is the owner of record of the property. 7. That Applicant developed Dove Meadows No. 1 prior to developing Dove Meadows No. 2, which is where these lots that he is FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 2 • • requesting the variance for are located; that Dove Meadows No. 2 is in the preliminary plat stage of development, which has not yet been approved and was before the City Council on March 19, 1996. 8. That the Planning and Zoning Administrator, Shari Stiles, commented on the proposed plat of Dove Meadows No. 2 that all lots must have a minimum frontage of 65 feet unless on a cul-de-sac and must have minimum square footage of 6,500 square feet. 9. That Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to the City Engineer, commented on the preliminary plat that the minimum street frontage for Lots 3 and 4, Block 3, and Lots 21 and 29, Block 2, shall be sixty-five (54) feet, measured at the arc for the curved portion, per City Ordinance. 10. That no people appeared at the hearing objecting to the variance application. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met including the mailing of notice of the proposed subdivision to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. 2. That the City has authority to grant variances pursuant to Section 11-2-419 of the Zoning Ordinance and pursuant to Section 11-9-612 of the Development Ordinances. 3. That the City Council has judged this application by the guidelines, standards, criteria, and policies contained in the Subdivision and Development Ordinance and upon the record submitted FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 3 • • to it and the things upon which it may take judicial notice. 4. That the Council may take judicial notice of its own proceedings, those of the Planning and Zoning Commission, governmental statutes, ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and the State. 5. That the following provision of Section 11-2-419 A, of the Zoning Ordinance, is noted which is pertinent to the Application: 11-2-419 A. The Council may authorize in specific cases a variance from the terms of this Ordinance or from the Subdivision and Development Ordinances as will not be contrary to the public interest where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. No non-conforming use of neighboring lands, structures or buildings in the same district and no permitted or non-conforming use of lands, structures or buildings in other districts shall be considered grounds for issuance of a variance. Variances shall be granted only where strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. A variance application does not go to the Commission unless directed by the Council. 7. That the specific requirements regarding a variance that must be evidenced and found by the City Council are as follows: 11-2-419 C. FINDINGS A variance shall not be granted unless (as a result of a public hearing) the Council makes a statement of supportive reasons based directly on the evidence presented to it which supports conclusions that the mentioned standards and conditions of this Ordinance have been met by the applicant and unless all of the following exist: 1. That there are such special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that the strict FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 4 • • application of the provisions of this Ordinance would clearly be impracticable or unreasonable; 2. That strict compliance with the requirements of this Ordinance would result in extraordinary hardship to the owner, subdivider or developer because of unusual topography, other physical conditions or other conditions which are not self- inflicted, or that these conditions will result in inhibiting the achievements or the objectives of this Ordinance; 3. That the granting of the specified variance will not be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the property is situated; 4. That such variance will not have the effect of altering the interest and purpose of this Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 8. That there does appear to be a specific benefit or profit, economic gain or convenience to the Applicant in that the Applicant would not have to meet the ordinance requirements that other developers of R-8 subdivisions have to meet, particularly in near and adjacent areas. 9. That regarding Section 11-2-419 C it is specifically concluded as follows: a. That there are no special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that the strict application of the provisions of the set back Ordinance would clearly be unreasonable, since other developers are being asked to do the same thing as the Applicant and Applicant lad the ability to design the lots to meet the street frontage requirement and still has the ability to change the layout of the lots, in that the subdivision is in the preliminary plat stage. b. That strict compliance with the requirements of the 65 foot street frontage requirement would not result in extraordinary hardship to the applicant as a result of factors not self-inflicted, in that he is designing the subdivision and the subdivision FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 5 • is only in the preliminary plat stage, which has not been approved. c. That the granting of the specified variance would not be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the property is situated, but the Applicant has the ability and the land to provide these lots with the required street frontage. d. That such variance would have the effect of altering the interests and purposes of the 65 foot street frontage requirement of the Zoning Ordinance. 10. That in regard to the first paragraph of 11-2-419 A, which is quoted above, it is specifically noted that it states in part, as follows: "No non-conforming use of neighboring lands, structures or buildings in the same district and no permitted or non- conforming use of lands, structures or buildings in other districts shall be considered grounds for issuance of a variance." 11. That it is specifically concluded the Application for a variance should not be granted because the Applicant could design the subdivision so that each lot, and particularly these two lots for which the Application has been requested, would have 65 feet of street frontage; there are no geographic or topographical reasons why the 65 foot frontage could not be met, and that the only reasons presented for the variance were that design of Dove Meadows No. 1 and that the Avest development caused these lots to be laid out as they have been shown on the preliminary plat, if that in fact is a reason. 12. The City has in the past granted similar variances as requested by the Applicant but has also denied such variances; each FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 6 application must stand on its own merits and the granting of one variance is not a precedent for granting others. APPROVAL OF FINDIH~rS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The City Council of the City of Meridian does hereby approve these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL: COUNCILMAN MORROW VOTED COUNCILMAN BENTLEY VOTED COUNCILMAN ROUNTREE VOTED COUNCILMAN TOLSMA VOTED MAYOR CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) VOTED DECISION That it is decided the variance from the R-4 street frontage requirement of sixty-five feet is hereby denied. APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Page 7 ., ~ • Meridian City Council March 19, 1996 Page 16 comp plan and we are having a discussion with them next month. I guess it is the Council's decision on how they want to handle this. Morrow: Well Mr. Mayor I would think the resolution to that would be between us and ACRD. Obviously we have a difference of opinion as to what the status of that road is and under one scenario there is not a bike lane and under another there is. Our comp plan clearly calls for an arterial and bike lane so I think it is up to us to resolve that whether who prevails at this point I don't know. I would think it would be in our best interest to press ahead with the bike lane there. Because if I remember correctly that is a corridor, Pine Street is a corridor that ultimately ties us to West Boise and there has been a lot of thought given to making that whole system work. So I think we will take that and handle that. Elg: Thank you Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we approve the final plat for Gemtone Center No. 2 subject to al staff, ACRD, Irrigation conditions with the exception that the City of Meridian and ACRD will resolve the difference of opinion concerning the bike lane and the classification of the street. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree, any further discussion? All those in favor say aye? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #6: PUBLIC HEARING: VARIANCE REQUEST FOR DOVE MEADOWS NO. 2 SUBDIVISION BY DAVE LEADER: Corrie: Mr. Leader or your representative like to come forward please. Ted Hutchinson, Tealeys Land Surveying, 109 S. 4th St, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Hutchinson: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, we are seeking a variance of the street frontage .requirements for two lots in the second phase of Dove Meadows No. 2. These lots are located on a curve that affects our ability to provide adequate frontage for these. This is also affected by the street location which was predicated by the platting of Dove Meadows No. 1. The change in the street layout with the development of the Avest property there were some changes in the street layout which would have affected ~ ~ • Meridian City Council March 19, 1996 Page 17 ultimately out of Dove Meadows No. 2. These lots exceed the minimum lot size in the R-8 zone and in fact the two lots, one of the lots is 8594 square feet in size, the other lot is 9062 square feet in size. This is considerably larger than the 6500 square feet required by the R-4 zone. We are seeking a variance brought down to approximately 50 feet for Lot 3 and to 54 feet for lot 4 on Block 1 of this subdivision proposed. Excuse me that is Block 3 of Dove Meadows No. 2. We believe that with the constraints and the size of the lots that is appropriate for this variance to be approved. The letter that I submitted with the application I outline the findings that must be made by the Council when they are reviewing the variance request. In that letter I also tried to address those findings to provide the evidence and the information that you would need to be able to support this variance request. With that I would answer any questions the Council would have at this time. Corrie: Council any questions? Anybody else from the audience that would like to give testimony on this variance request? Council any discussion here? I will close the public hearing. Morrow: Mr. Mayor I would move we instruct the City Attorney to prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law for the variance request for Dove Meadows No. 2 subdivision. Rountree: Second Corrie: Moved by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree on the variance request to have the city attorney prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law, any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #7: PUBLIC HEARING: TRANSFER OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO NEW HORIZON CHILD CARE BY TRUDY CUMBA: Corrie: Is Trudy or anybody here for this? I will open the public hearing at this time. Penny Madrid, 5510 South Beaver Place, Boise, was sworn by the City Attomey. Corrie: Is this the one for 1830 North Meridian Road? Madrid: Yes Corrie: Do you have anything you want to say? Any questions for Council? • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: MARCH 19.1996 APPLICANT: DAVE LEADER ITEM NUMBER; 6 .REQUEST; VARIANCE REQUEST FOR DOVE MEADOWS N0.2 SUBDMSION AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION; SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS "REVIEWED" SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS a~ P 1~ ~ ~ ~~ ~,~~ ~~r OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. WILLIAM G. BF_RG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney . HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 Motor VehiclelDrivas License (208) 888-4443 ROBERT D. CORRIE Mayor COUNCIL MEMBERS WALT W. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M. ROUNTREE GLENN R. BENTLEY P & Z COMMISSION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman TIM HEPPER JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND MALCOLM MACCOY TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 12 , 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 2/27/96 HEARING DATE: 3/19 /96 REQUEST: Variance for Dove Meadows Subdivision No 2 BY: Dave Leader LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Proposed Lots 3 ~ 4 Block 3 of Dove Meadows No. 2 Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z -GREG OSLUND, P/Z -TIM HEPPER, P/Z -ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR -RONALD TOLSMA, C/C -CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C -WALT MORROW, C/C -GLENN BENTLEY, C/C .-WATER DEPARTMENT -SEWER DEPARTMENT -BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMAR S: CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER CITY OF ~ERIDIA'~ " ~,~, OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BF_RG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 ROBERT D. CORRIE Mayor GOUNGIL MEMBERS WALT W. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M. ROUNTREE GLENN R. BENTLEY P & Z COMMISSION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman TIM HEPPER JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND MALCOLM MACCOY TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 12 , 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 2/27/96 HEARING DATE: 3/19 /96 REQUEST: Variance for Dove Meadows Subdivision No 2 BY: Dave Leader LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: Proposed Lots 3 8~ 4 Block 3 of Dove Meadows No. 2 Subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z GREG OSLUND, P2 TIM HEPPER, P/Z ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C GLENN BENTLEY, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PREUM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES ~, a ~` OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ~_ • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • Va'ILLIAM G. BF_RG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney A Good Place to Live CITY OF 1Vt~RIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public WorksBuilding Department (208) 887-2211 Motoc Vehicle/Driver; license (208) 888-4443 ROBERT D:. ~ORRIE Mayor GOUNGIL MEMBERS WALT W. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M. ROUNTREE GLENN R. BENTLEY P & Z COMMISSION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman TIM HEPPER JIM SHEARER GREG OSLUND MALCOLM MACCOY TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR CO1Vfl~iENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the MerFdfan Gity Council, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: March 12 , 1996 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 2/27/96 FARING DATE: _ 3/19 /96 1-~--- REQUEST: BY: Dave Leader LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: JIM JOHNSON, P/Z ~MALCOLM MACCOY, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z GREG OSLUND, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z ROBERT CORRIE, MAYOR -RONALD TOLSMA, C/C -CHARLIE ROUNTREE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C -GLENN BENTLEY, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT -SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) INTERMQUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ( i4f-~,~ MAR - 5 1° 6 CITY OF i~1E~i~.3~~,~