Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PNE/Edmonds AZ
~t~~~~~~ r=-y ` PROF 4F PUBLICAI i0~! County of Ada State of Idaho ~. St~,Z~q~-Sp being first duly sworn, on oath says that she is the principal clerk of TFIE VALI-EY NEW S, a newspaper of general circulation, published wkly at Meridian. County of Ada, State of Idaho; 'That the annexed notice was published in said newspaper once cash and every.week for _~_ consecutive weeks, First publication being on the~_ ~Y of s~ fc-~~.,_19~, and ~e last publication being on the ~ ~Y of `'°`~''~ ' 19~6~. ??Zest the said ne~'spaper has be,°n pub'.:shed continueusl and uninterruptedly inlaid county during a period of more than seventy-eight consecutive weeks prior to the first publication of the attached notice. 0.../ ry Principal Cl rk day of Subscribe and sF'orn before me the 19 ,Q~_• o a P~sbiic t .. s ee ~~T ARY • • A o • ~ o mos ~ ~ o C ~ v e ~, • ° U~?, e .~ v~ °a o~~1O i~~ °o o°eoooo~~~ 'S' 'oo ~' qTF ~ ~'' '° ,s ~ i 1 ~,o~ .~-?=--~~=gam--- Valley News-Times ORDINANCE N0.680 AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF- ARIEL ESTATES SUBDIVISION, OF RECORD IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, SPECIFI- CALLY A 12 FOOT ~EAIRRIGIAN- TION EASEMENT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 1 Sxtion 1.Thatputsmt Sa1306A, ~~Y, m Qtaptor 13. ~14.~~• 8! City of Meridian. h~v~Q required hearing and it ap~ propernoticx of said hearin and these being no ob' vacates the 12 foot wilt easementloatedinihe~ of Lot 6, Block 1 of Arid i, LOT61iLOCK 1 OFARIELF,STATES SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO division, according to the ~ thereof fled in Book 64 F THEOFFICIALpI-ATTHEREOF.IN BOOK640FPLA'fSATPAGES6582 page 6582 and 6583, Cornrty. Naha this AND 6583, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND p1tdVID- ~~~taffeasnootherp; ~ ~ Ariel Estates Subd'r` ING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Section2.wHEREA~ WEIEREAS,theC;tyCamciland ~~~~ therefor, whirl 4 the Mayor of the City of Meridian, th i is hereby declared to exist,, e n Idaho,.have concluded that it is ancest~alltskeeffuxaad best.uderest of said City to vacate a from and afters its pas portion of Ariel Estates $ub~iviaian, specifically the twelve foot eaxmmt and blication a: tecpi PASSEDbYtheGty located in the noRhcast comer oaf Lot 6, app~~ ~ tl-e Mayor Block 1 thereof. NOw, THEREFORE. BE IT Meridian, Ada County, Idal day ~ D~unber 1994. ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF A. MERIDIAN, ___ADA -COUNTY, GRANT P K3 IDAHO: ! OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Potice Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney STATE OF IDAHO ) ) County of ADA ) ~~ HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY ~\ A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887813 Pubtic Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor ss. COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner 8 Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman -Planning 8 Zoning Ordinance No.680 was published in the 'Valley News during the period of December 29 1994 and January 5th .1995. The copy enclosed is the true and valid certified copy. ~.l~Y v- - in Meridian commission expires 08/02/99 Illt11/14! /!I!!~ ~,,~~t-, ~ L . ~; ~.,0 `e. ,~ .7~~Pr:6b"G~.. A9 ,iii ~l r 1 G;s~~ ~~ _ .l f., ; ~+ ,' ~' 3 0~ -u' ~~ ~ ~ 9~~, ~ J ~~ ~v~ ,~'~ -' ~o a `~ ~~~~errarrse~~a r-~, ~''\ The regular meeting of the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairman Jim Johnson at 7:30 P.M.: MEMBERS PRESENT: TED HEPPER, CHARLIE ROUNTREE, JIM SHEARER: MEMBERS ABSENT: MOE ALIDJANI: OTHERS PRESENT: Will Berg, Wayne Crookston, Gary Smith, Shari Stiles, Roen Wilson, John Sanford, Robert Webber, Helen Sharp, Dale Sharp, Eric Anderson, Scott Thom and Barbara Myall, Pat Sandford, Carl Rosson, R.W. Peckenschneider, Opal Dixon, Harrington, Floyd and Kathy Reichert, Melinda Harper, C.R. and Linda Powell, Layne and Tina Merits, Dwayne Ward, Gloria and Richard Fem, Paul McKague, Douglas Mellor, Ranae Mellor, Mary Brockway, Dennis Brockway, Jon Bames, Chris Williams, Jack Sweet, Wayne S. Forrey, Vern Alleman, Ron Thurber, Kathleen Coulter, Jim McGarvin, Dick Schraudt, Don Sweet, Steve Jensen, Scott Stewart, Ted Hutchinson, Stephanie Churchman, Gary Lee, William Ball, Burt Borrup, Don Brian, Joe Simunich, Tom Zabala, Tom Miles, Dan Torfin, Bernadine Morgan, Dennis Baker, Joe Glaiser, David Baley, Jay Jones, Kim Daniel: MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 13, 1994: Johnson: Are there any correction, additions or deletions to these minutes? Rountree: I have a spelling correction on Page 11, second to the last line, last word, creative spelling of pneumatic, other than that. Johnson: Any other corrections or deletions or additions, if not I will entertain a motion please. Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I move we approve the minutes of the previous meeting.. Shearer: Second Johnson: It has been moved and seconded to approve the minutes as written with the one correction, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #1: TABLED AT SEPTEMBER 13, 1994 MEETING: ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST FOR PNE/EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION: Johnson: Is there a representative that would like to come forward and address the Commission at this time, please do so. /`~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 2 Ted Hutchinson, 109 South Fort Street, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Hutchinson: Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, at your last meeting when this application was heard the Commission membersn ontthe Brown property We have put what we have proposed as far as the developme together a preliminary sketch which includes, this is the Brown property right here. I believe our client is also in the process of negotiating with Mr. Reichert for picking up the additional parcel right here. So we are planning for this entire parcel. Mr. Borrup who also testified at the last meeting, his property is right here, it comes down and then abuts the Packard property which is coming before you tonight. But we are proposing this as a preliminary layout. We will do this in phases because of the access issues that are involved. The Highway District has a limitation of up to 40 units if it is only going to have one access, and presently the only access we have availability to is this one out of Chamberlain Estates. If Packard is approved it would provide an access to the south. We are providing for stub streets to future developments to the east. Also, recognizing Mr. Alleman's requirements and agreement that we provide sewer or so that we can access sewer along the north slough we are also providing a future stub to the west which would also enter Chamberlain Estates at this point. We are also providing for the possibility of a stub street directly north to Ustick Road. When we submit this it would be for a preliminary plat, we have a few things to work out yet in regard to this particular plat, but then it will be submitted to you in that form. Are there any questions from the Commission? Hepper: Where is the end of Wingate Lane? Hutchinson: Wingate Lane is a series of easements which goes from Ustick Road and it also provides service to Sharp's down on the south end. It is our proposal that our part of the property would develop on our part of the easement at this point. There is a 15 foot easement, the Borup's, Reichert's and Sharp's would all have access to public streets through this development so technically it would be shutting off of Wingate at that point. Hepper: (Inaudible) Hutchinson: In taking into consideration those persons who commented last time we don't want any access to that. If those people who are involved with the easement are agreeable and we are providing public street access then it would be our preference to shut it off. Hepper: Have you contacted any of those people to see if they are agreeable to that? Hutchinson: We haven't yet, we are still in the preliminary stage, but recognizing those folks who want no access we are trying to work that out the best we can. /'` C ~ ~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 3 Hepper: (Inaudible) Johnson: Any other questions of Mr. Hutchinson? Thank you. What is your pleasure? Shearer: I move we have the attorney prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law on this project. Hepper: Second Johnson: I have a motion and a second to have the City Attorney prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #2: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR REZONE REQUEST BY TREASURE VALLEY WORSHIP CENTER: Johnson: Is there any discussion regarding the findings of fact as prepared by the City Attorney? I will entertain a motion. Hepper: Mr. Chairman, I move the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian hereby adopts and approves these findings of fact and conclusions. Shearer: Second Johnson: Its moved and seconded that we approve the findings of fact and conclusions of law as prepared, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Hepper -Yea, Rountree -Did not Vote, Shearer -Yea, Alidjani - Absent, Johnson -Yea (tie breaker) MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Johnson: Is there any recommendation you wish to pass on to the City Council? Hepper: Mr. Chairman, I move the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission hereby recommend to the City Council that the rezone and conditional use permit requested by the applicant for the property described in the application be approved with the conditions set forth in these findings of fact and conclusions of law and that the property be required to meet the water and sewer requirements, the fire and life safety codes and the Uniform Building Code and other ordinances of the City of Meridian including all parking areas MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: ,'^"~u~cQ o X994 APPLICANT: PNEIE^"^w~ne ~nNCTRtICT10N AGENDA ItEM NUMBER: 3 REQUEST: T N N AN Z NING AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: COMMENTS FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW '1 ~ V I( ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: if ~ ~~. ~; L ~ ~ ~~- ~~ °' ~ Y G~'J OTHER: f ORIGINAL BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PNE EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION AND BROWN ANNEXATION AND ZONING GOVERNMENT LOT 3, SECTION 6, T. 3N. R. lE. B.M. ADA COUNTY IDAHO MERIDIAN. IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for consideration on September 13, 1994, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and was tabled to October 11, 1994, for a subdivision plat to be submitted, and the Planning and Zoning Commission having heard and taken oral and written testimony and the Applicant appearing through Ted gutchinson, and having duly considered the matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of public hearing on the annexation and zoning was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for September 13, 1994, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the September 13, 1994, hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations. PNE EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 1 ~ n 2. That the property included in the application for annexation and zoning is described in the application, and by this reference is incorporated herein; that the property is 22.66 acres in size; it is located between Locust Grove Road and M~a~/~ n' oad and between Fairview Avenue and Ustick Road; it is northeast of Chateau Meadows # 8• 3. That the property is presently zoned by Ada County RT (Rural Transition) and the proposed use is requested to be for R-4 Residential type development. 4. The general area surrounding the property is either developed or is proposed to be developed. The land is presently used for agricultural purposes and there is one house on the property. 5 . That the property is adjacent and abutting to the present City limits. 6. The Applicant is not, as of the date of application, the owner of record of the property. The owners of record are Billie W. and L. Joy Brown, who have granted permission for the annexation and zoning request. 7. That the property included in the annexation and zoning application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 8. That the entire parcel of ground is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 9. That the Application requests that the parcel be annexed and zoned R-4 Residential; that the present use of the property is PNE EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT ~ CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 2 -~ for one house and for agricultural uses; that the applicant indicated that the intended development of the property is for an R-4 type subdivision use; that the Applicant did not submit a request for approval of a subdivision plat at the time of submitting the application for annexation but has now submitted an application for subdivision approval; that Ted Hutchinson stated that Chateau Meadows was adjacent as was Chamberlain Estates; that he had questions on access to Ustick Road; that he had no problems with the comments of the City staff; that he had met with ACRD; that the density was unknown; that there would be a mix of houses; that there was no problem with pathways and some park space; and that lots around existing houses would be 1/2 to one full acre. At the end of the hearing he stated that Wingate Lane was narrow and tree lined and access through Wingate would not be wise; that the parcel abuts Chamberlain Estates and roads will probably align with the roads in Chamberlain Estates; that it is not their intention to access Wingate Lane; that flood irrigation would be replaces with pressurized irrigation; that there was no plat because they were trying to work out plans, particularly for access. 10. There were several property owners in the immediate area who testified about the Application; the testimony can be summarized as follows ccot- a. Butch ewe testified that he resides in Chateau Meadows but wants development limited to single level houses; that there was a waste water problem in the area; the northeast corner of Chateau Meadows is used as waste area; that there is a water problem; drains should not be tied to irrigation; that the south line should be waste ditch. Mr. ew also testified at the end of the ,$';,cor PNE/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 3 hearing that he did not have a ground water problem b. Bob Howe testified that he lives in same area as Butch Sewer; that he desired french drains w/single level houses; wants same view that he has always had; that foxes in the area should be caught and moved. c. Vern Alleman made some comments towards the plat of the proposed subdivision which had not been submitted at the time of the hearing and stated that when the plat was heard he would testify again. d. Albert Dauben stated that he lives across from access road to the existing house; that he desired a berm hill and fence to protect his property from the development; that there would be a problem with houses backing on Wingate Lane; that he was not against subdivision but Wingate Lane must be protected. e. Betty Jo Paremoe wants the Wingate private lane maintained; that there is a road association; that she likes the rural and quiet area as it is and desires no change; she wants a safeguard for privacy. f . Dale Sharp stated that ~~(he was opposed to the subdivision because of growth, traffic and problems for the schools; she wants Wingate Lane kept private; that she wants the subdivision bermed off and separate; that she wants Wingate Lane fenced off; that the lane cannot take more traffic. Mrs. Sharp testified at the end of hearing that she questioned pressurized irrigation and that we do not need more houses. g. Floyd Reichert stated that he wants annexation to happen; that Wingate Lane is illegal; that the easement should be kept open; that he desired two stor}(y houses; that there were no restrictions on Wingate Lane. h. Helen Sharp questioned a zone change with the generality of the proposal that had been submitted; that she desired a plan to be presented; building has created problems but nothing is being done about it; she wanted to know what was being done about parks; she stated that Wingate Lane is a private lane and people do take care of it; that there was not enough information to make a decision; she questioned whether this zone change complies with the Comprehensive Plan; that no more students could go to Chief Joseph elementary school; that she was opposed to growth with no planning. i. Susan Smith testified that she wants private lane PNE/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 4 --~ quality; that she does not oppose the subdivision; that she want there to be no usage of Wingate Lane; that there is an informal road association for Wingate Lane; that should be no additional usage for Wingate Lane. j. Mick Dauben testified that there is too much growth in the area and that he desires a plan for the subdivision. k. Shirley Shy stated that she apposed the subdivision and that there was too much traffic on Wingate Lane. 1. Mark Peterson that he lives across the street from the majority of subdivision with 5 acres he thought; that he desires a berm; that the lot size should be limited in size to 5 acres; that he wants a country setting. m. Don Bryan testified that people are fighting access to their lane; his concern is .the traffic flow; that traffic should be sent to Fairview and not Locust Grove Road; that development is not causing traffic to go to Fairview; drainage of roads should not go to irrigation drains; drainage should not be to the South Slough. n. Rick Schultsmeir testified that he lives in Boise; that his mother lives on Wingate Lane; that the quality on Wingate needs to be preserved. o. Barb Borup testified that wished that the quality of growth could remain the same; that the City makes the final decision on Wingate Lane; that she has a lot of questions about Wingate Lane. p. Sheryl Howe stated water is his concern; that there is water under their house; that the ditch behind them needs to be tiled. q. Larry Sale, Ada County Highway District representative, testified that Wingate Lane is a private owned by some or all of the people; that it could become public at the owners' request if ACRD to accepts; that the Lane could be condemned; he does not anticipate that condemnation would occur; that some road water can be discharged into drainages but not live irrigation ditches; that he suspects ACRD will ask for a stub street to Ustick Road; that the traffic in the center of the section will be drained to arterials; that he thought there would be no public street connection to Wingate Lane. 11. That the property is in an area marked on the Generalized Land Use Map of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as a single family PNE/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT ~ CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Pale - 5 .-~ /'\ residential area; that in the Comprehensive Plan property inside the Urban Service Planning Area may be developed at greater densities than one dwelling unit per acre. 12. That in the Rural Area section of the Comprehensive Plan, Land Use, Rural Areas, Section 6.3, it does state that land in agricultural activity should so remain in agricultural activity until urban services can be provided. 13. That Meridian has, and is, experiencing a population increase; that there are pressures on land previously used for agricultural uses to be developed into residential subdivision lots. 14. That the property can be physically serviced with City water and sewer if the Applicant extends the lines. 15. Meridian City Engineer and Meridian City Planner did submit comments and such are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. That the Meridian Planning Director stated that the application was consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan; that a bike/pedestrian pathway is indicated along the northern boundary; that a non-combustible fence is required along the South Slough prior to construction; that perimeter fencing is required prior to construction; that a development agreement is required as a condition of annexation. 16. That the City Engineer commented that the legal description included as Schedule C to the application should be used for the annexation ordinance, if approved; that the property is contiguous to the City limits; that water and sewer were PNE/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT ~ CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 6 .-~ ^. available; and that public access would be provided when Chamberlain Estates No. 1 develops its eastern boundary; and that Wingate Lane, a private Lane, provides access for the present owner along with other property owners adjacent to the Lane. 17. That the Ada County Highway District, Meridian Fire and Police Departments, Meridian School District, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, Central District Health Department, and other agencies did not submit comments, but when they are received they shall be incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 18. That the R-4, Residential District is described in the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 3 as follows: R-4) Low Density Residential District: Only Single Family Dwellings shall be permitted and no conditional uses shall be permitted except for Planned Residential Development and public schools. The purpose of the (R-4) District is to permit the establishment of low density single-family dwellings, and to delineate those areas where predominately residential development has, or is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, and to protect the integrity of residential areas by prohibiting the intrusion of incompatible non-residential uses. The (R-4) District allows for a maximum of four (4) dwelling units per acre and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City bf Meridian. that the R-4 zoning district requires a minimum of 1,400 square feet to be included in houses in that zone. 19. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Residential Policies, 2.1U states as follows: "Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi-family, town houses, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities." 20. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, PNE/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 7 Rural Areas, 6.3 c., it states as follows: i"'~ "Within the Urban Service Planning Area development may occur in densities as low as 3 dwellings per acre if physical connection is made to existing City of Meridian water and sewer service and the property is platted and subdivided . 21. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Rural Areas, 6.4, it states as follows: "Residential development is allowed in the rural area provided that said development does not exceed the Rural Residential Agricultural density, unless it is inside the Urban Service Planning Area and City sewer and water is provided, then Low, Medium and High density residential may be considered. All residential development must also comply with the other appropriate sections of this plan." 22. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Housing, Housing Policies, at page 66,~it states as follows: "1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile homes, multi-family, town houses arrangements), ." "1.3 An open housing market for all persons, regardless of race, sex, age, religion or ethnic background." "1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping centers should be encouraged." 23. That there is a population influx into the City of Meridian at the present time which has been going on for some time and is likely to continue; that the land is relatively close to Meridian and economic conditions are making it difficult to continue farming in the area. 24. That the City Engineer has previously submitted comment in different applications that a determination of ground water level and subsurface soil conditions should be made; that such a PNE/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT ~ CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 8 ~ ~ comment is equally applicable to this Application. 25. That in prior requests for annexation and zoning in this area the Zoning Administrator has commented that annexation should be conditioned on a development agreement including an impact fee to help acquire a future school or park site to serve the area and that annexations should be subject to impact fees for park, police, and fire services as determined by the City and designated in an approved development agreement. 26. That in 1992 the Idaho State Legislature passed amendments to the Local Planning Act, which in 67-6513 Idaho Code, relating to subdivision ordinances, states as follows: "Each such ordinance may provide for mitigation of the effects of subdivision development on the ability of political subdivisions of the state, including school districts, to deliver services without compromising quality of service delivery to current residents or imposing substantial. additional costs upon current residents to accommodate the subdivision."; that the City of Meridian is concerned with the increase in population that is occurring .and with its impact on the City being able to provide fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services to its current residents and to those moving into the City; the City is also concerned that the increase in population is burdening the schools of the Meridian School District which provide school service to current and future residents of the City; that the City knows that the increase in population does not sufficiently increase the tax base to offset the cost of providing fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services; and the City knows that the PNE/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 9 increase in population does not provide sufficient tax base to provide for school services to current and future students. 27. That pursuant to the instruction, guidance, and direction of the Idaho State Legislature, the City may impose either a development fee or a transfer fee on residential property, which, if possible, would be retroactive and apply to all residential lots in the City because of the imperilment to the health, welfare, and safety of the citizens of the City of Meridian. 28. That Section 11-9-605 C states as follows: "Right-of-way for pedestrian walkways in the middle of long blocks may be required where necessary to obtain convenient pedestrian circulation to schools, parks or shopping areas; the pedestrian easement shall be at least ten feet (10') wide." 29. That Section 11-9-605 G 1. states as follows: "Planting strips shall be required to be placed next to incompatible features such as highways, railroads, commercial or industrial uses to screen the view from residential properties. Such screening shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') wide, and shall not be a part of the normal street right of way or utility easement." 30. That Section 11-9-605 H 2. states as follows: "Existing natural features which add value to residential development and enhance the attractiveness of the community (such as trees, watercourses, historic spots and similar irreplaceable amenities) shall be preserved in the design of the subdivision;" 31. That Section 11-9-605 R states as follows: "The extent and location of lands designed for linear open space corridors should be determined by natural features and, to lesser extent, by man-made features such as utility easements, transportation rights of way or water rights of way. Landscaping, screening or lineal open space corridors may be required for the protection of residential properties from adjacent arterial streets, waterways, railroad rights of way or other features. As improved areas (landscaped), semi- PNS/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 10 ~ n improved areas (a landscaped pathway only), or unimproved areas (left in a natural state), linear open space corridors serve: 1. To preserve openness; 2. To interconnect park and open space systems within rights of way for trails, walkways, bicycle ways; 3. To play a major role in conserving area scenic and natural value, especially waterways, drainages and natural habitat; 4. To buffer more intensive adjacent urban land uses; 5. To enhance local identification within the area due to the internal linkages; and 6. To link residential neighborhoods, park areas and recreation facilities." 32. That Section 11-9-605 L states as follows: Bicycle and pedestrian pathways shall be encouraged within new developments as part of the public right of way or as separate easements so that an alternate transportation system (which is distinct and separate from the automobile) can be provided throughout the City Urban Service Planning Area. The Commission and Council shall consider the Bicycle-Pedestrian Design Manual for Ada County (as prepared by Ada County Highway District) when reviewing bicycle and pedestrian pathway provisions within developments. 33. That proper notice was given as required by law and all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission were given and followed. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met; including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. PNE/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 11 r n 2. That the City of Meridian has authority to annex land pursuant to 50-222, Idaho Code, and Section 11-2-417 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that exercise of the City's annexation authority is a legislative function. 3. That the Planning and Zoning Commission has judged this annexation and zoning application under Section 50-222, Idaho Code, Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Meridian City Ordinances, the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the record submitted to it and things of which it can take judicial notice. 4. That all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been complied with. 5. That the Commission may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and State. 6. That the land within the proposed annexation is contiguous to the present City .limits of the City of Meridian, and the annexation would not be a shoestring annexation. 7. That the annexation application has been initiated by the Applicant, PNE/Edmonds Construction, and the annexation is not upon the initiation of the City of Meridian. 8. That since the annexation and zoning of land is a legislative function, the City has authority to place conditions upon the annexation of land. Burt vs. The City of Idaho Falls, 105 Idaho 65, 665 P.D 1075 (1983). 9. That the development of annexed land, if annexed, must PNE/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 12 .-~ n meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616 which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, 11-9-605 M, Piping of Ditches, and Section 11-9-606 B 14., which pertains to pressurized irrigation; that the Applicant would be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer; that the development of the property would be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance; that, as a condition of annexation the Applicant would be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address the inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, R, L and prior comments of the previous Planning Director, Wayne Forrey, relating to the lack of adequate recreation facilities and that land set aside for a future park would be desirable, that the City is in need of land set-asides for future public service use; that the development agreement shall, as a condition of annexation, require that the Applicant, or if required, any assigns, heirs, executors or personal representatives, pay, when required, any development fee or transfer fee adopted by the City; that there shall be no annexation until the requirements of this paragraph are met or, if necessary, the property shall be subject to de-annexation and loss of City services, if the requirements of this paragraph are not met. 10. That proper and adequate access to the property has not been shown. 11. That since the Applicant's property is in an area marked PNS/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 13 /~ ~ ~~. as a single family residential area, the annexation and zoning Application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and does not conflict with the Rural Areas policies; however, there are very large lots across Wingate Lane that shall be buffered by the Applicant and the subdivision covenants shall let the home owners in the proposed subdivision know that those lots are there and that the buffering must remain; that this matter shall be addressed in the development agreement. 12. That the development of R-4 as suggested by the Applicant is not compatible to the homes across Wingate Lane; that R-4 development would be compatible with the lots and homes in Chateau Meadows and Chamberlain Estates; that some type of transition development between the Wingate lots and the Chateau Meadows and Chamberlain Estates lots needs to be put forth for the development of the property. 13. Therefore, based on the Application, the testimony and evidence, the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian, it is ultimately concluded that Applicant's property should be annexed and zoned, but the actual zoning of the property should be left up to the City Council as the Commission does not feel comfortable in having the entire parcel zoned R-4; that in the period before the City Council hearing the Applicant should make it known that it desires to have the portion of the land abutting Wingate Lane zoned at a much less dense zone than R-4, such as R-2, to provide a transition between the acre, or more, lots along Wingate Lane and the R-8 lots of Chateau Meadows PNE/EDMONDS FINDINt~S OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page _- 14 r~ n and Chamberlain Estates; the zoning should not drop off directly from R-2 to the R-8 of Chamberlain Estates and Chateau Meadows but gradually go down to the R-4 to tie in then with the R-8; that the conditions would be those stated above if the property is eventually annexed and zoned; that the annexation would be more of an orderly development and reasonable if some type of transition development is put forth between the western part of the land and the eastern part adjacent to Wingate Lane; that the property shall be subject to de-annexation if the requirements of these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are not met. 14. That if the Applicant does not request that transition zoning be applied to the land and submit a plat application showing this, it is concluded that the property should not be annexed; that it is of great concern to the Commission that the lots along Wingate Lane are protected; that the matter should be tabled until a new subdivision application is submitted; that as a condition of annexation, when annexed, it is concluded that a fence should be placed along Wingate Lane to prevent home owners on this land from gaining access to Wingate Lane, particularly because it is a private lane. 15. That the South Slough runs along the north boundary of the property, and as a condition of annexation the South Slough must be landscaped to fit into other improvements that have been made along the slough with a pedestrian and bike path. 16. That all ditches, canals, and waterways required to be tiled by City Ordinance shall be tiled as a condition of PNE/EDMONDS FINDINQS OF FACT ~ CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 15 i annexation, when annexed, and if not so tiled the property shall be subject to de-annexation. 17. With compliance of the conditions contained herein, the annexation and eventual new plat to meet the transition between acre or more lots and R-4, would be in the best interest of the City of Meridian, but the Application should be tabled to allow the Applicant time to submit another plat. 18. That if these conditions of approval are not met the property should not annexed. 19. That if these conditions of approval are not met the property should not annexed. 22. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind the applicant and its assigns. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL ~/~,~ COMMISSIONER HEPPER VOTED~~ COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE VOTED_~~~-f COMMISSIONER SHEARER VOTED ~-~ VOTED 6--- COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) VOTED PNE EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 16 gECO~iENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends that the Application for annexation and zoning be tabled; if the Applicant shall not meet these conditions, the Application shall be denied. MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: PNE/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 17 TEA!'~Y'S LAND ios scum 4~ street Vise, Idaho 83702 SURVEYIWG (208) 385-0636 Fax (208) 385-0696 ~~~~V~D N 0 V - 91994 CITY OF MERIDIAN TR,~NSMI'I'~'A., November 8,199# Fro}ect I408 TO: Shari Stiles Meridian Zoning Administrator FROM: Ted Hutchinson RE: Brown Properly Annexation ( ) For your action (X} Far your files Shari: The attached schematic lot plan of the Brown property was presented at the Meridian Plarming :Zoning Commission for ~a...nRtr~tiygnu snly. It was not intended for use as either a.prelimituay plat or ~1~ design proposal. No infererx;e of ultimate design far this proper should be made from the attached schematic lot plan. Tl~ £omrtmssion wed to see a proposal that was solely for example.. As dated above,. this deslgu was purely for demonstration. Reference to the schematic without this attached disclaimer should not be made.. ~ specific $pp#ication will. include. the platting. design and. layout request for the Brown. property.. Again, nothin8 should be inferred from the demonstration drawings. r; Ted ~ i'v Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 13, 1994 Page 12 Johnson: Any other questions? Thank you, this is a public hearing anyone else like to comment on this application? Seeing no one then I will close the public hearing. We need findings of fact and conclusions. Alidjani: Mr. Chairman I make a motion we have the City Attorney draw findings of fact and conclusions of law. Hepper: Second Johnson: It has been moved and seconded we have the City Attorney prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law for the conditional use permit for West One Bank all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #7: PUBLIC HEARING: ANNEXATION AND ZONING FOR PNE/EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION: Johnson: I will now open the public hearing, if the representative for the applicant would like to address the Commission please do so. Ted Hutchinson, 109 South Fort Street, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Hutchinson: We are representing the applicant in this case which is Pacific Northwest Electric and Edmonds Construction. We are seeking annexation of about 22 acres of land which lies northeast of Chateau Meadows #8 and to the east of Chamberlain Estates. Presently we don't have a development plan we are working out some logistics concerning access. Provision of sewer and water for this particular site and as soon as we get those things covered we will be bringing forth the development proposal for this site. We are asking that you rezone this R-4 which is compatible with the existing and proposed development that is occurring in the area. For instance Chateau Meadows is zoned R-8, there is another development application southwest of this that is about an 1/8 of a mile southeast which is also going to be coming shortly before this commission. Also for R-4 so the zoning will be appropriate for the area. As I stated we are trying to work out some logistics concerning access. Part of it with Chamberlain Estates in extension of the streets. We are also working on an internal street system which would provide access to Ustick Road and to other accesses while recognizing that Wingate Lane has its own set of problems and we are trying to avoid exacerbating the problems existing at that site. We are going to be contacting those people just to get their general feel about the development in that area. If there are any questions from the Commission I would like to answer them at this time. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 13, 1994 Page 13 Johnson: Any questions? Hepper: Have you seen the comments from the City staff? Hutchinson: Yes, I have and I have no problem with the comments that we have seen. Hepper: You have also seen the ones from Ada County Highway District? Hutchinson: Yes, we have had a meeting with the Ada County Highway District and when the development plan comes in it will be in compliance with their goals as well. Hepper: What is the density, it is R-4 that you are asking for, what is the actual density, do you have any idea? Hutchinson: We don't have the actual density figured out yet. Part of the plan is to accommodate the existing house on at least an acre so we are trying to mix some of the lot sizes in there. We will have some larger estate sized lots. But with the smallest being the minimum of 8,000 square feet. But we are trying to at least mix it in there so we can at least provide a nice development in that area. Shearer: You said you didn't have any problem with providing a bike path and pathway through that area as part of your subdivision? Hutchinson: We recognize that the Comprehensive Plan has indicated that the pathways are interconnected and we are, the preliminary plans that we have seen so far are going to provide for some park space and some interconnections for bicycle pathways through the development. Rountree: Define an estate sized lot. Hutchinson: Well, vNe are proposing that the existing house will be on at least an acre so we will try to keep them in that neighborhood. A few of the lots that will be right around the house, the existing house and to the north of that. So we are talking anywhere from half to a full acre. Johnson: Any other questions? Thank you very much, we will give you an opportunity to come back. Anyone else from the public like to address the Commission? Butch Suor, 2550 North Meadow Glenn, was sworn by the City Attorney. Suor: I am presently residing in Chateau Meadows and right now we are on the back line, Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 13, 1994 Page 14 we have a nice view of Bogus Basin and what have you and we realize that development will go on, but one concem of mine. I would like to see, if it is going to be approved as R-4 I would like to see it limited to single level housing. In other words I don't want second story houses going up and blocking most of my view that I bought the house originally for. Another concern when the engineering does go in there is a waste water problem in that area as far as irrigation. And on the northeast corner of Chateau Meadows they are effectively using the Ada County Highway Departments pipe to waste water for irrigation. It is back feeding the street dry wells in between the houses including my own. Which is raising the water table during irrigation system season. And we do have water problems from time to time. I see this as an opportunity of bringing all those ditches together because when Chateau Meadows was developed it was on one side of the fence and this property is on the other side of the fence so they had double waste ditches and so they tiled one. But environmentally Idon't particularly care for street drainage being tied directly to irrigation water. I think this is a direct no no. But it is a situation that I would like to go on record now to be addressed at the time the engineering goes in. I think it is an opportunity that whole south line is a waste ditch and it is an opportunity to bring all of that together and actually put it underground and we can be done with it. But that is the only 2 concerns that I had. Like I say it is R-4 but I would like to see single level housing in there only. Johnson: Thank you, anyone else? Bob Howe, 2194 East Lochmeadow Court, was sworn by the City Attorney. Howe: I am with Mr. Suor, I am in the same area, same line. The situation with the waste water is very important as you well know. Most of you, Wayne knows, in the past we had a problem with the waste water situation. The irrigation backed up underneath our houses and we had to put french drains in and those kind of things. So that is very important to us as well. I do agree 100%, the only reason I bought that lot was my understanding from the owner of the land behind us that he didn't plan on selling. Of course life goes on and people make decisions. I would like to see single level houses at least in the end where our houses are so we can have the view that we have now. Those are the main reasons that we bought that land. I don't want anybody living behind me, if it does come in and things happen who knows I might sell. Another thing too is I am a hunter, I enjoy hunting, and I watch the foxes run in the back fields there and hunt. I think there is a house or a home or burrow or whatever you call it in that area some place along that waste ditch. I think those foxes need to be caught and moved before the division starts into the place. Exactly where they are I don't know but I do know that they run west and east through that field. 1 think we should look into that before we move on. That is all I have. Vern Alleman, 2101 East Ustick, was sworn by the City Attorney. --~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 13, 1994 Page 15 Alleman: I guess I am here just mainly to gain information. I understand that this is for annexation and zoning. My concern is when the plat is made and all of that. Will there be another hearing and will I be notified of that? So I can make comments at that time. Johnson: When we get a specific plat of the lot sizes and design and configuration then you will get noticed again, is that correct? Crookston: Yes Alleman: Well that is my concern. And then that will also include where streets and sewer and all of those things are. Those things affect me and that is why I am concerned about it. Albert Dauven, 2820 Wingate Lane, was sworn by the City Attorney. Dauven: Well, I live right I guess basically across from the access road that the house that they were talking about that they are going to leave there on 1 acre. And when they built that house we were not notified through County zoning or anything. Off Wingate Lane the County Zoning agreed that there would be no more access off it. I guess what I am here for is just to make sure that this is recognized by all parties and everyone. I think you will hear from a lot more people down the lane that we want a berm hill and a fence and we want it maintained. Because you put a bunch of houses backed up to Wingate Lane and they have automatically got an alley. So we have to stop it because the kids, where the ditch line goes through the half mile section between Eagle Road and Wingate Lane all the kids use that as a motorcycle trail and bicycles and what have you. We have livestock, horses and stuff like that and you bring a bunch of city kids out there and you are just asking for a bunch of trouble. So I think that, I am not against the subdivision all I am saying is that lane has to be protected. There is not a real good way of protecting it other than making it so they cannot make a driveway into their backyard through it. Because once they do it its too late. And that is about all I have to say. Johnson: Anyone else? Billy Jo Premoe, 3045 Wingate Lane, was sworn by the City Attorney. Premoe: I wanted to follow up on what AI said. We all who belong to the road association on Wingate Lane would like to state very clearly that we would like to maintain the private lane status that we have at this time. (End of Tape) We would like to preserve the privacy status of our road. We have a road association and provide the funds to maintain that road. And we do that even though we don't like to do because we like the benefits that come with having a private road. We do like the type of life we have their. We like the ,-~ n Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 13, 1994 Page 16 rural situation, the quietness. We would really like to preserve that. When we see subdivisions backing up against it we really want to make it clear that we want some safeguards for our privacy. The things that we bought our land for and their are about 10 families that all feel I believe the same way on this issue. Johnson: Anyone else? Dale Sharp, 2445 Wingate Lane, was sworn by the City Attorney. Sharp: I am somewhat opposed to this subdivision because we do have a situation developing in Ada County in its self with the growth going on or traffic of schools, our water situation. And so I think we need to take a look, I don't think we need to have to do a lot of studying (inaudible) because there are a lot of material out there to know that we have problems. But on top of that I have to agree with these people on Wingate Lane that Ada County we went before them and they said that there would be no more access to that lane. So if you put a subdivision in there we want that harmed off with a fence clear across and around that subdivision so we don't have a problem. I have a stub coming into my property along the south side and I do have motorcycles, 4 wheel drives and they go down there and they hit my fence and they have told me and they throw trash out. And so I say if you do rezone this for a subdivision that a fence goes clear across so they can't go into Wingate Lane. And so we don't have this problem. We have a lot of people on there now to help maintain the lane and we can't have any more traffic on it. So that is about all I have to say. Johnson: Mr. Sharp, is your property the most southerly on Wingate? Sharp: Yes Johnson: Are you on the east or west side of Wingate? Sharp: I am on the west side. Johnson: Anyone else? Floyd Reichert, 2575 Wingate Lane, was sworn by the City Attorney. Reichert: I rise in favor of the annexation. I have some things to say that the negativity out there on that lane is tremendous. And I do not want to see the impact come onto what this Wingate Road Association in my opinion which is illegal. If you go down to the courthouse in Ada County, I believe the year is 1913 the land owners on the northwest corner dedicated 15 feet on the east side of that subdivision and all of those successors ,-~~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 13, 1994 Page 17 would be bound to that easement. I would like to see that easement kept open and any landowners that success that property have full access to that property and do not impact me on that by closing that off in a restriction. Legally I think they have that right. There are people that live on the east side of that land that have never dedicated a foot that have impacted that lane tremendously on what is set out there. They won't widen it and so the more growth you get out there we get into a real chaos. I would like to see 2 story houses because I have a 2 story house and I don't want to have the only 2 story house out there. don't think there should be any restrictions put on the homeowners that buy in that area that they need a one story or 2 story. I rise again in favor of the annexation with no restriction to Wingate Lane of those successors because they own part of that lane or bought into it. That is recorded at the Courthouse and I can get that road agreement if you would like. Helen Sharp, 2445 Wingate Lane, was sworn by the City Attorney. Sharp: I find this all very interesting. I find it very hard to believe that even Meridian Planning and Zoning would grant any kind of a zoning change with the generalities that we are offered tonight by the person that wanted this. There was .nothing concrete, nothing definite. It was we plan, we plan and we plan. I think something definite should be in the making before any of us agree to anything. I would like to have that considered very strongly. Another thing today, I took upon myself to call 3 local realtors because I didn't' think that we needed to by yes and by golly what was happening. Those of us that live in the immediate area know what the building has done, we know what it has done to the traffic, the schools and everything else. But nobody cares and nobody listens. They say they are listening but they don't' hear. (Inaudible) there are going to be studies on Locust Grove, we have yet to hear the results of any of those studies other than the fact that we have right and a partial 3 lane road from the subdivisions to Fariview Avenue. It has done nothing to cut traffic it has done everything to increase traffic. We have not heard how many houses this (inaudible) ad we do know because of what was told that there is going to be additional requests for subdivisions in that same area. I am saying what about the definite for a park, the green belt. As far as Wingate Lane and the easement and the accessibility it is a private lane and those on the lane mostly have taken care of it. As far as not being legal I am sure we can have an association if we want to take care and maintain that lane. Not just for the dust but if you have gone up and down a private you know what it can do to a vehicle and the alignment. Everything else, I just cannot believe that you would expect you to (inaudible) or annexation with the generalities he has given you. Anybody can give you that little bit of information. Another thing is so many of the requests that have been denied, I (inaudible) what the Comprehensive Plan is, I have never heard other than the fact that there is one. Does this or do these particular zone changes comply with the Comprehensive Plan? (Inaudible) We do know the kids cannot go into the (inaudible) Chief Joseph School (Inaudible} because it is overcrowded ,~ n Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 13, 1994 Page 18 already and they are bussing them. Here again (inaudible) take the responsibility of what is happening. They say okay you can go to the school, as a builder as a developer as a realtor, these are the joys you get for building and living here and that is not true. (Inaudible) who has to take responsibility for granting these things that are not in fact truths. The children cannot go to that school, they have to be bussed, there is a sign on the door, no more students for Grade 4. (Inaudible)And we are talking about the sewer, we are talking about the (inaudible) lawsuits because of the drain off. The developer, the builders, the realtors they knew this, but who cares. I live on Wingate Lane and I have lived there for practically 30 years and I for one am opposed to this wild growth (inaudible). Thank you. Johnson: Anyone else? Susan Smith, 3020 Wingate Lane, was sworn by the City Attorney. Smith: I too would like to maintain the private lane quality that we have enjoyed since we have lived there the last almost 10 - 11 years. I guess for me personally I do not oppose the proposed subdivision. I do have some natural feelings about what is going on around us but I don't' have any, I would have any grounds for that. I would prefer that there not be any usage of Wingate Lane to either facilitate the building of that subdivision nor usage after the subdivision is in. We are a narrow, dirt road. Massive bumps, there come times it becomes difficult to drive up and down that lane. There is some equipment going up and down that lane for usage now and it makes a big difference in the quality of the road. It is a very informal road association that we have. We try to operate as inexpensively as we can. It seems to be the need of everybody on that lane and yet we have to do something to maintain some kind of road quality. We are fortunate enough to have some people that live on that lane that do the work free of charge. So my purpose I guess is just to see that the road not have any additional usage to facilitate this subdivision in any way. Johnson: Anyone else? Mick Dauven, 2820 Wingate Lane, was sworn by the City Attorney. Dauven: Mine is going to be real short too. I just would like to comment on the growth in the area and make sure that somebody has a plan. You have this subdivision, you have another one tonight. There are 2 or 3 that are in the development stage. It is getting pretty big out there, the infrastructure is getting real crowded. Hopefully there is a master plan out there that is going to take some of this into account. That is all the comments that I've got. Johnson: Thank you Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 13, 1994 Page 19 Shirley Shy, 2425 East Ustick, was sworn by the City Attorney. Shy: I opposed the subdivision because there is enough traffic on that lane. I have lived on that road for 27 years and we have plenty of traffic on that road. I think there should be more consideration of the lane. Thank you. Johnson: Thank you Mark Peterson, 2700 Wingate Lane, was sworn by the City Attorney. Peterson: We live on the property directly across the street from where the majority of the subdivision is going to be located. When we got the building permit granted we were pretty well assured that we were the last ones on the lane that had a buildable lot and that the lot sizes for anyone on the lane had to be at least 5 acres. So, my concern is that I think we need to maintain the berm like they said or limit access to the lane. And possibly consideration if they are going to go through with the subdivision to limit the lot size on what is adjacent to Wingate to possibly 5 acres. I realize the development is going to have to go on, I am in the construction industry myself. We were under the impression when we moved out there that we were going to have a country setting and that the lot sizes were going to be fairly big for the houses. The impact of high density housing in that area, you have already heard about. You need to take that into consideration. Johnson: Anyone else? Don Bryan, 2070 N. Locust Grove Road, was sworn by the City Attorney. Bryan: I wasn't planning on talking again tonight, but I have to. These people used to be my neighbors before we got the 1500 houses built up between. Two of which were Butch and his neighbor which are blocking my view of my neighbors. No development is going to have them but what we have going here is these people are fighting the access to their road, which I don't blame them a bit they have a nice road out there and it would be nice to keep it a country lane and protect them with our Comp plan that we worked on and the proper berming and fencing and things that we were trying to control the quality of life between the agricultural and residential. It would be a good opportunity to put that in the works. My concern is mainly the traffic flow. We are building up a lot of houses in that area and we are closing it all in the center of that section. And the main access for all of that traffic is going out to Locust Grove through Chateau Meadows and the Chateau Lane which is the main feeder. The reason I am talking tonight is to put my bid in early tot he developer and the people that are working with the developer to start looking at a way to put that traffic flow out to Fairview Avenue and eliminate some of this traffic on Locust Grove that is going to be, it is already out of control. And with the development by the r1 n Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 13, 1994 Page 20 church property we are starting to close that off too so maybe it is too late to even look at. But we need to start getting that flow out towards the main arterial which is Fairview Avenue and not Ustick Road or Locust Grove Road. And the developments that are under way now the problems, I deal with problems on almost all other subdivisions but initially that was a halfway plan to connect Wingate Place and Dove Meadows and the back part of Kearney Meadows all coming out to Fariview. But the way they are developing it it isn't happening. I don't know who dropped the ball or what is happening but they are going to get locked in there and I don't know how many hundreds of houses are out there that are all going to be going down Chateau Drive. I think that needs to be looked at right now before it goes any further into the final or preliminary plat and they start the drawing stages. It would save everyone some grief. Also, I have a problem with the drains, I though# the drain was corrected but I guess it is okay to dump the road drains into the irrigation canals because that is what is happening at chateau Meadows and when we had, when Butch had his problem with the water out there in this particular parcel. We looked at that, I thought there was going'to be something done to correct that situation because that is not a good situation. I don't know if it is legal or not, maybe Larry knows. That needs to be addressed too as we proceed with development. They are just going to the into that ditch that is there now and they are just going to keep feeding that street drain right into the south slough. That needs to be addressed also. Does anybody have any questions? Johnson: Any questions of Don? Anyone else? Rick Schultzmier, 4105 North Five Mile, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Schultzmier. Presently I live in Boise, my mom Dixie Roberts lives at 2855 Wingate Lane. We moved out of Boise to get into a country setting and enjoyed the quality of life that is out there. Since I have grown up I have had to move back into Boise into houses next to me and unfortunately like most times we don't understand what we had before. The people on the lane out there have a quality of life that needs to be preserved. I can see that now that I moved in Boise and I would like to make sure you realize that is a private lane and that it stays that way. I think it is very important to keep some of that around still. That is basically all of the comments I have. Thank you Johnson: Anyone else? Burt Borup, 2640 Wingate Lane, was sworn by the City Attorney. Borup: I don't have as many statements as I do questions. I think what is important to the people on Wingate Lane is ultimately we all I think initially moved out there for the quality of life and I am sure all of us wished that it had stayed the same. But we can't stop the ~ ~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 13, 1994 Page 21 growth and we are all aware of that fact. I think one of the biggest issues on Wingate Lane is Wingate Lane, not necessarily the subdivisions or anything else. My question is does this board have final jurisdiction on what happens to that lane? Johnson: No Borup: Who does? Johnson: The City Council makes the final determination. The procedure is that at the initial meeting of Planning and Zoning which we are at now we collect data which is your opportunity as part of the public to testify and give us information and input. Following the collection of that data then we have the City Attorney look at it for findings of fact and conclusions of law. Which is nothing more than to address the issue legally. You know is the application legal, can we zone it there if we wish. How does it stack up in the courts with (inaudible). Borup: Does this entity have the jurisdiction to say this remains a private lane or does not? Johnson: No, and then it goes from the findings of fact and conclusions of law to the City Council and that is the procedure. The City Council can make the final determination. did you have something you wanted to say? Shearer: If it is a private lane, 1 don't think Johnson: We are not talking about a private lane, I thought we were talking about the issue. Shearer: He is talking about the lane. Johnson: You want to take about Wingate Lane, Wingate Lane is not before us tonight. Borup: I understand that but I am asking a question in as much as could you possibly tell me what government entity has the final say so on saying whether Wingate Lane stays private or public? Johnson: I don't' know if we can, we will ask staff. Borup: Will you pass this information onto the people possibly that could give us the information? Johnson: We may get that answer for you tonight, we may not. We are not completed with Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 13, 1994 Page 22 this hearing yet and I am going to ask both ACRD and staff if they have comments on this application since we have had so much input and they are both here tonight. Borup: I guess it is of primary importance to everybody here that lives on Wingate Lane that one government agency an actual dictating policy can say to us this is a private lane as long as you do X,Y and Z it will remain a private lane. I think something needs to be put on paper and possibly as Floyd pointed out maybe it already had, maybe a portion of it already has. I am in the dark about a lot of things, and I have listed to and I have tried to be a good listener to just about everybody on the lane. But it is of prime importance to everybody on the lane of what happens to that lane. I realize that we are talking about a subdivision and not the lane. If this entity doesn't have the ability to pass that ruling that is understandable but I think everybody on the lane would like to know hard and fast black and white where we stand. If we do this will we remain one? If not what are our alternatives? Shearer: (Inaudible) property owners request it I can't see how it could ever be a public road. Borup: Is there a situation where if the Shearer: The County or City can't go in and take property from people. That thing is a private road. Everybody here seems to be against this lane opening up and being public. Johnson: Not everyone. Shearer: But if it became a road and there was adequate stuff there and it was requested from ACRD and they took it over you would end up with getting your road paved and etc. Borup: I can attest to the fact that nobody has brought it up yet tonight but there is a real and present danger either entering that road or exiting that road. I don't think anybody is going to argue that fact with me that lives on Wingate Lane. And whether this subdivision goes through or not with the amount of traffic that we have in that area, sooner or later, it is going to take car wrecks or what is it going to take or who is going to. I am really lost, I am befuddled as to is it just the property owners than? To the best of your knowledge Mr. Shearer? Shearer: If you guys own the property Mr. Attorney? Crookston: Well, you already have the possibility that Ada County Highway District would decide that needed to be a public road and even if the property owners didn't like it they can condemn it. n Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 13, 1994 Page 23 Borup: Second question, let's say there is an accident involved with somebody exiting off of Wingate onto Ustick that is a property owner on Wingate Lane and hypothetically speaking this person is at fault. Is the person at fault responsible since he is a resident of that lane and that lane posed a problem than is everyone on the lane at fault? Crookston: Well, the predominant fault is going to be the operator of the vehicle. Borup: I understand that, but (Discussion Inaudible) Borup: Is that a possibility speaking as an attorney? Crookston: 1 really can't give you (inaudible). Borup: I want to know everything that is involved in living on Wingate Lane from a legal standard, from a government standard. We know it from a neighbor to neighbor stand point. I think everyone on the lane pretty much plus or minus a point pretty much knows what everyone on the lane thinks. I would also like it to be a situation where possibly a document is drawn. Let's establish what can happen on Wingate Lane. If the subdivision chooses to stub a road onto Wingate Lane can they cross Wingate Lane. Johnson: I think we are getting a little off our subject here, I understand your concern and think that, I am assuming you have a homeowners association, you have a road association. I would think that is something you would want to know and you need to fair it out. The agency that makes that determination, we may get you some information yet tonight if you hang around. Borup: One of the things is if they, I live directly across from a portion of this proposed development, if they choose to stub a road off in my direction and I know how sensitive the City is to landlocking any parcel of ground. Will in fact this be an exercise in futility, can they cross Wingate lane at some time? And if so whose permission does it take, does it take everyone on the lane's permission or does it take my permission or does it take my permission or the subdivision across the street? Johnson: Well, those are good questions, I am not sure we have those answers for you tonight. Borup: I didn't expect you to have the answers tonight. But I would like to be able to see some of these things addressed before this thing goes to plat approval. That is all I have to say. .~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 13, 1994 Page 24 Johnson: Thank you, is there anyone else? Sheryl Howe, 2194 East Lochmeadow Court, was sworn by the City Attorney. Howe: My main concern is the water, we h d I ke 61 n hes oflwate~under our house for different up here, new people up here. We about 7 months. And they did a lot of research out there and it is clay. We need to have that ditch behind us encased because it is going to be a mess if there are a lot of houses back there. It is major, it is wet under our house now, there was almost a lawsuit over this. Let's take care of this before it is a big mess. Johnson: I don't' think we have had a change on this board in about 5 years. I think City Council might be what you are thinking. Anyone else? I would like to see if the representative from ACRD has any comments to make. Larry Sale, 318 East 37th Street, Garden City, was sworn by the City Attorney. Sale: Do you have questions or do you want me to talk? Johnson: If you can shed some light, enlighten the public with respect to private lanes and or future plans and if you have any comments regarding water and I also plan to have the City Engineer come forward. Sale: Wingate Lane is a private street, it is owned by some or all of the people who live along it. There is no public agency that has any right to that street. It can become a public right of way only under 2 situations I believe and one would be that the current owners of the street would request the highway district to accept it as a public road and in order for that to occur the highway district would require that it be brought up to public road standards before it would be accepted as a public road. Mr. Crookston was correct in that if the highway district determined that there was an overriding public need for it to become a public street. It could be acquired by the highway district. I don't anticipate that occurring. With regard to street run off mixing in the irrigation channels, we are allowed under certain conditions to discharge storm water run off into certain water courses, not all. We are allowed to discharge water after treatment into most of the drainage ditches in the County not live irrigation ditches. While listening to the testimony I worked on a vicinity sketch that we have here and it certainly isn't' gong to be good for the audience to view. This is the existing public street pattern in the area. Subject property, there is one street stubbed into it from the west out of this subdivision that I can't recall the name of immediately to the west. There is a stub street out of I guess it is Kearney Place it comes north up towards the property. There is another stub street out of the proposed Chamberlain Estates Subdivision that is about 300 feet west of this property, a stub street Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 13, 1994 Page 25 coming in from the west. I suspect that the highway district will require a stub street to this parcel's north boundary. We will look at that canal and see how large it is. We will want to get a street out to Ustick somewhere in here. A fairly major street actually that helps by draining this property back out to the north. This is Hickory Drive that comes in through Dove Meadows past the church, it comes up into this 40 acre parcel that has been, I think it has been acquired by developers, they met a time or 2 with us. I think we would want to see a street connection between this intervening area and that parcel so that people can find their way out to the arterial system. Eventually we will have another collector coming in from Eagle Road in this location somewhere. So the center of the section will be directed out to the arterial. Unfortunately it has to wait until it is all pretty well developed to do. Any other questions? Johnson: Any questions of Mr. Sale? Rountree: There was indication of a requirement or possibility of stubbing a street into Wingate Lane, a requirement to do that. Sale: We will not require a public street connection to Wingate Lane or to put it another way I don't think we would allow a public street connection to a private street. Hepper: Would you allow a street stub to the east to cross Wingate Lane? Or would you require one? Sale: Mr. Chairman, and Mr. Hepper, I suppose we would entertain that if it were proposed. Certainly there is every right to extend a street across Wingate if it were needed by somebody on the east side. I can't recall the development pattern on the east side, those are all pretty large lots as I recall. Johnson: Any other questions? Okay Larry we may need other comments if something else surfaces. Gary Smith, City Engineer, do you have some comments you would like to make regarding water? Is there anything you can help there with respect to that ditch being tiled? It will be tiled, I know our ordinance calls for that. Nothing at this point, thank you. The developer, would you like to make some comments after you have heard the testimony? Hutchinson: Thank you Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, again I am Ted Hutchinson with Tealeys' Land Surveying. I have for illustrative purposes an Aerial photograph (inaudible). This is the brown house as it sits on the parcel, (inaudible). This is Wingate Lane as it extends down to provide access (inaudible). We have spent a great deal of time examining this parcel and the access issues that are involved with it. We looked at Wingate Lane and based upon our survey of that particular area when we just i-~. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 13, 1994 Page 26 simply drive down Wingate Lane and take a look at it. First of all it is a very narrow street, there are numerous trees along one side, if that road were to be improved the majority of those trees would have to be removed. And then there are a couple of houses that sit up rather close and would actually end up in the public road right of way. As we looked at that we recognized that particular access into that parcel would not be a wise choice. I think that other ways into this particular parcel will be more convenient and actually better serve this particular area. So it is not our attention to make the connection to Wingate Lane. We also recognize that existing easements are in place for those persons that have access both on the east side of the parcel and to the south of the parcel. And that the access will have to be maintained for those individuals. We know that the Chamberlain Estates is extending streets to the west and will actually abut our west property line that are coming from the west to the east. And it will probably provide our first access points out to the western portion of the property out toward Locust Grove. We are looking at other options and as Mr. Sale indicated they are looking for an access point to Ustick road. Since it is ACRD policy to require that all of the interior traffic from a section be funneled through collector streets out to the major section line arterial. It is our plan to incorporate that type of roadway system into this development. This isn't a Willy Hilly type of development, we have spoken with your staff at great length concerning the requirements out in this particular area. We have come up with a couple of proposals that we are just looking at in the preliminary stages trying to plan for how this particular is going to grow and in essence come up with a viable plan that is going to be workable and yet preserve the existing neighborhoods and try not to have much impact on them. We have also worked with Ada County Highway District trying to make sure we meet their requirements providing access and public streets into the development. Listening to most of the testimony they are concerned about the access onto Wingate Lane that is not our intention to access Wingate Lane. We know the problems that exist out there, we don't' want to be dumping any of the traffic from this development down that particular narrow pathway. I think that would take care of or answer most of the concerns that have been addressed there. With regard to water, presently this site I believe is flood irrigated, as most parcels of agricultural use they are flood irrigated. With development you will see a decrease in that water use because we will go into a pressurized sprinkle system. And that will hopefully eliminate or help alleviate some of the problems with existing high ground water in that particular area. The homes on this site will be connected to municipal sewer, will be connected to community water service. So we have tried to avoid any impact on existing wells that are in that particular area. Again the only reason that you don't have a proposal before you at this time is we are trying to ~nrork out the logistics of providing a quality development that has good access. Obviously this is going to be a difficult parcel to market because it doesn't have any access directly onto Ustick or any of the other mile streets in that area. We have got to take care to make sure that we do come up with an access point that is going to provide us with a quality entrance into the development. (Inaudible) answer any questions that the Commission might have at this time. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 13, 1994 Page 27 Shearer: Do you know this water problem is that strictly a ground water problem or is this irrigation water that has gotten away in that particular area. Is the ground water that shallow in that section? Hutchinson: Mr. Shearer I don't have any information to that effect. I believe typically Mr. Smith requires the establishment of the ground water levels in the area so we will be working toward that as required by the City Engineer. Rountree: What is the time line on your proposal? Hutchinson: Mr. Chairman, Commissioner Rountree, we are hoping to probably make the next cut off date for submittal to the city staff. Our client has had people looking at possibly purchasing the Brown parcel and they want to know how the subdivision development is going to be laid out around that particular house to accommodate that house. We want to move as quickly as we can yet trying to make sure we address all of the issues as they arise. Johnson: Any other questions? Anyone else from the public that hasn't commented that would like to comment or an additional comment from anybody that has already been here. Suor: In regards (End of Tape) water table out there, this was a low spot, part of this was a low spot in Chateau Meadows at the time. And that problem was not addressed and what happened is the developers and (inaudible) did some test holes and then consequently what they did was broke the hard pan and gave this clay saturated soil and ability to drain between the hard pan and clay, fine (inaudible) as of this year which we had a dryer year than we did last year to my knowledge none of the people in question had a water problem including myself. But what is happening here if I might show you the existing, I started to talk (inaudible) is this waste ditch that comes out this northeast field. This is the property line to the north of the property that is in question right now. There is a waste ditch for irrigation that comes down here and incorporates the ACRD street drainage pipe down through here to this box right here and then drains into a lost ditch that goes along the west boundary of this property and into the south slough. What is happening is this comes down here and the mud and whatever from the field is contaminating these street dry wells. Because there is no separation of elevation of these pipes, when they cut loose up here and drain into this field it comes down in here and fills this drain up. And if I was ACHD (inaudible) in time they might have some work that they might not want to do. And my personal feeling is this ditch pipe and this street drain should be 2 separate pipes. The irrigation water should be separated from the street drain water just to keep down contamination. Johnson: Thank you. n ~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 13, 1994 Page 28 Sharp: What he was saying as far as the water they were going to have a sprinkler system am I to assume that is for all of the subdivision. Okay and he says that is not going to affect any wells, where is he going to pump this water from? It is not from the ground water. Johnson: He is talking about a pressurized irrigation system which utilizes surface water, isn't that correct? That is what our ordinance requires. Sharp: Well, where is he going to get the surface water, that is going to be pressurized to operate the sprinkling system? Johnson: It comes through the ditches, the same ditches that are not to flood irrigate the property. Sharp: I see, and the other question I wanted to know. The person that he is representing that owns this property was here not too long ago trying to get another zone, denied because of the water problems and the hard pan. I wanted to know if anything had been done to correct these problems and what they propose to do besides the sprinkler system. I don't know if I ask you that or if I am allowed to ask him. Johnson: You have to address your questions through us, perhaps we will get an answer. Sharp: We do know she was in trying to get the I think 17 acres next to her because of these very problems. I want to know what was done to eliminate the problems that we can ad to them and make more subdivisions. And as I started to say earlier when I called these realtors, the 3 of them in Meridian there are over 600 pieces of property available new and used. (Inaudible) don't need more houses, there is certainly not a demand for building. (Inaudible) repeating constantly I would like to see the Comprehensive Plan and just how much building they intend to allow before they step back and look at the situations have been addressed. Johnson: Very good, I believe our Comprehensive Plan is now published, approved and for sale, it is $25.00. Sharp: Does it change with every subdivision? Johnson: No, the comprehensive Plan is a general guideline but it does talk about specific areas that are intended in the overall residential. And of course there is no impotice put on by the City to do that it is the property owners. But you need to read that because it gives you a general guideline on what the City is trying to do. It is a pretty comprehensive plan. It is pretty lengthy. ~ n Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 13, 1994 Page 29 Alleman: I guess my question was I thought that I would be able to testify on these once a plan was drawn. Shearer: You will Alleman: Is this the time to make comments on those kinds of things? Johnson: You can make comments now because it is a public hearing but you will have a better opportunity perhaps to get specific once we get a plan on what they are actually going to put in when the plat comes before us. This would show streets, roads, size of lots etc. Alleman: I am deeply concerned about those and I thought that would be the time for me to make my comments as to what those were and how they would affect me and what my opinions was of those at that time. So I haven't put any input in regards to these things at this time. Johnson: Well, you will get notified Vern. Alleman: And that would be the appropriate time for me to comment. Johnson: As a matter of fact at this juncture I would like to encourage all of you that testified tonight to keep track of this, follow it through to the City so you get an opportunity to go before the City Council on it when it gets there which will probably be sometime in November at this point. Is that about right? Shearer: You might comment too Jim that for some of the people's information that all of this approval does is annex the ground. This thing still has to come back before this group with a plat that has the actual lot, streets, etc and that is not approved at this time. That is another phase. Johnson: That is correct, anyone else? Seeing no one then I will close the public hearing at this time. What would you like to do? Rountree: Mr. Chairman, just for discussion purposes I would like to see since it is eminent to the proposal that is being worked on by the developer for this project before we work at preparing findings of fact and conclusions of law so we will at least have some information to base conditions. Johnson: What would you like to do? Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission September 13, 1994 Page 30 Rountree: I make a motion that we table this item until we receive the conceptual proposal at a minimum and possible a preliminary plat until our next regularly scheduled meeting in October. Hepper: Second Johnson: We have a motion and a second to table this matter until we get a more definitive conception, until we get more information on what is actually going in here, is there any discussion before we take the vote? Shearer: Wayne, can't we make conditions on the plat, can't we go ahead and annex this property and then when it comes in at the plat make the conditions on the plat? We don't' have to hold it up for those conditions that are going to be on the plat anyway. Crookston: It depends on what kind of conditions you want to make. The City including the Planning and Zoning Commission has much more authority to place conditions at the time of annexation then it does on the platting. They meet the ordinance requirements on the plat and it has been annexed than that is all they have to do. Shearer: That is all 1 wanted to know. Johnson: Do we have any further discussion? We have a motion and a second, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Johnson I would like to take a 5 minute break at this time. FIVE MINUTE RECESS Johnson: Let's call the meeting back to order. ITEM #8: PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ASHFORD GREENS SUBDIVISION BY BRIGHTON CORPORATION: Johnson: I will now open the public hearing, if there is a representative for Brighton or Ashford Greens Subdivision would you please come forward. Mike Wardle, 9550 Bethel Court, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Wardle: Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission I have placed a slightly reduced scale MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: September 13.9994 APPLICANT: PNEIEDMONDS CONSTRUCTION AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 7 REQUEST: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING AGEf~Y COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: COMMENTS fORTHCOMiNG CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: COMMENTS FORTHCOMING CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: "REVIEWED" CITY FARE DEPT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: /~ P ~\,~ OTHER: HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chlef W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAVNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642. Phone (208) 8$8-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-221 I GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor To: Mayor, City Council, Planning & Zoning Commission From: Gary D. Smith, P.E. RE: PNE/EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION (Annexation and Zoning) COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner 8 Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman • Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments for your information and or use as conditions of the applicant during the hearing process: The legal description submitted as Exhibit A and the legal description submitted as Schedule C each describe the property proposed for annexation. The description in Schedule C should be used for the Ordinance if this request is approved. 2. The property appears to be contiguous to existing city limits caused by the Chamberlain Estates and Chateau Meadows Subdivision annexations. Sanitary sewer exists at Locust Grove Road approximately 1650 feet west of this property's west boundary. Service to the northerly part of this property can be provided by developer extension of the South Slough Interceptor through Chamberlain Estates No. 2 Subdivision. Service to the southerly part of this property should be available by connection to a future sewer to be constructed by the developer of Chamberlain Estates No. 1 Subdivision. 4. Domestic water exists in Locust Grove Road. Service can be provided as an extension of the proposed water lines in Chamberlain Estates No. 1 Subdivision. 5. Public access would be provided when Chamberlain Estates No. 1 develops to its eastern boundary. Wingate Lane, a private access, exists along this property's east boundary. This lane provides access for the present property owner along with other property owners adjacent to the lane. HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICELGASS,CityTreasurer ~~~ ROBERTD!CORRE GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer CITY F MERIDIA WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO p SHARI STILES KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 ~ ~r ' 2 Q~~P3lanner & Zoning Administrator W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief ~JJ-'P JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 8871813 Chairman -Planning & Zoning MEMORANDUM Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 ~,~ ,~ `~' ~~• r~an~:~'Y~11~~`'a~'~ GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TO: Plannin & Zoning Co ssm~~ission, Mayor and Council ;:: -~k FROM: Sh~L. tiles ann >~'"& Zonin Administrator '~ ~ g g DATE: SUBJECT: September 9, 1994 Annexation and Zoning of R-4 for PNE/Edmonds Construction 1. Request for annexation and zoning of R-4 is consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 2. Bike/pedestrian pathway is indicated along the northern boundary of this property in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 3. Non-combustible fencing is required along the South Slough, outside of Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District and/or Bureau of Reclamation easement, prior to construction. Perimeter fencing is required for the rest of the development prior to construction unless specifically waived in writing by the City. 4. A development agreement is required as a condition of annexation. ~ ~ HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk e S CITY OF MERIDIAN MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE neer P.E. Clty Eng GARY D. SM TH WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. s 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES upt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste water Planner a Zoning Administrator KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887813 Chairman -Planning 8 Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning 8ti Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: SeQtember 6. 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 8/15/94 HEARING DATE: 9/13/94 REQUEST: Annexation and Zoning BY: PNE/ Edmonds Construction LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North and east of Chateau Meadows East #8 JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P2 JIM SHEARER, P2 CHARLES ROUNTREE, P2 TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT -POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RE LAMATION(PRELIM FINAL PLA' CITY FILES ~ ~ OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARK "a..a~rartra OFFICIALS HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA N WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk MERIDIAN MAk YERRINGTO e S y CITY OF WALT W. MORROW neer City Eng P.E GARY D. SM TH BRUCE D. STUART, water works supt. 33 EAST IDAHO _ SHARI STILES ~ . inistrator Ad ~' ~ ~' JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. s ~.a ' ~'° `~ ~ m anner 8 Zoning KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 ~ JIM JOHNSON W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief Attorney JR TON phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887813 A p 1 f'_ ~ (; ~(~~ lr t1 U V "t Chairman -Planning 8 Zoning ., , WAYNE G. CROOKS Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 J H GRANT P. KINGSFORD ~, °, i ~~ ~., r 1 r) E:. u s ~i 1 !"17 Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning Sz Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: September 6, 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 8/15/94 HEARING DATE: 9/13194 REQUEST: Annexation and Zoning BY: PNE! Edmonds Construction -- LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North and east of Chateau Meadows East JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P2 JIM SHEARER, P2 CHARLES ROUNTREE, P2 TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELlM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES ~_ /~ _ ~ (~ ATHER ~ / (~` ~°a ExcE~l~, ? yf° ~ ,~~\ ~~ Q ~~ ~.. /'~ SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Bob L. Haley DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT Dan Mabe, Finance & Administration DIRECTORS Sheryl Belknap, Elementary Jim Carberry, Secondary Christine Donnell, Personnel Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911 MERIDIAN STREET MERIDIAN,IDAH083642 PHONE(208)888-6701 ~~~~~~ August 17, 1994 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 AUG 1 9 1994 CITY ~~ ~~~i~e~i~ RE: Request for Annexation and Zoning submitted by PNE/EdmondsConstruction (Chateau Meadows East #8) Dear Councilmen: I have reviewed the request submitted by PNE/Edmonds Construction (Chateau Meadows #8) for annexation and zoning. This planned development will accelerate the need for Joint School District No. 2 to construct additional classrooms and/or to adjust school attendance boundaries. Meridian School do not have excess capacity. Nearly every school in the district is beyond capacity. The Meridian School District supports economic growth for Idaho and Specifically the district's area, but such growth produces a need for additional school construction. We ask your support for a development fee statute on new home construction or a real estate transfer fee to help offset the costs of building additional school facilities. If this support is lacking then we ask that additional residential development be denied. Sincerely, Dan Mabe, Deputy Superintendent DM:gr n ~ / ~~ i ~,~~~ ~~ :~L6NN J. i2HODES, President ;:TERRY R HUGER, Vice President TAMES E. BRUCE. Secretary TO: ACHD Commission FROM: Development Services SUBJECT: Meridian Annexation INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE WINGATE.MA/DSTECH 9-7-94 DATE: September 1, 1994 Wingate Lane s/o Ustick Residential (Applicant - PNE/Edmunds Construction, 3131 Lanark, Meridian, ID 83642) (Representative - Tealey's Land Surveying, 109 S. 4th St., Boise ID 83702) PRELIMINARY REPORT - NOT FINAL UNTIL APPROVED BY THE ACRD COMMISSION FACTS & FINDINGS: 1. PNE/Edmunds Construction is seeking annexation by the City of Meridian for 22.7-acres located on the west side of Wingate Lane (private) south of Ustick. The application includes the zone change from RT to R-4. The proposed use is for a single family residential development. This parcel does not have frontage on a public street. 2. GENERAL INFORMATION: ACRES - 22.7 PRESENT ZONING - Residential - RT PROPOSED ZONING - Residential - R-4 ESTIMATED VEHICLE TRIPS PER DAY - Dependant on density TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE - 265 IMPACT FEE BENEFIT ZONE - West Ada IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - Western Cities 3. Wingate Lane is a private road with a gravel surface. The road is narrow caith many trees, irrigation facilities and other appurtenances in close proximity to the roadway. In its current configuration, it does not appear possible to upgrade Wingate to public street standards. 4. This application is scheduled for public hearing by the Meridi- an Planning & Zoning Commission on September 13, 1994. ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 Meridian Annexat~` Wingate s/o Ustick ?'-hgle Family Residential September 1, 1994 Page 3 Public street drainage facilities. shall be located in the public right-of-way or in a drainage easement set aside specif- ically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, or other valuable amenities placed in said easement. 8. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for review and appropriate action by ACRD. 9. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot property lines when the driveways are not being shared with the adjacent property. 10. A right-of-way permit must be obtained from ACfID for all street and utility construction within the public right-of- way. Contact Construction Services at 345-7667 (with zoning file number) for details. 11. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any require- ment or policy outlined herein shall be made, in writing, to the Manager of Engineering Services within 15 calendar days of the original Commission action. The request shall include a statement explaining why such a requirement would result in substantial hardship or inequity. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. STAFF SUBMITTING• DATE OF COMMISSION APPROVAL: Larry Sale ,a c _~ 30 94 zy 1} -3_ ~ 3 ---~ c ____. . _ - ~ ~~ s ~ y-~ 1 1c' _ ~ AUG "~ ~y Iv. ~ 2 19 . ~ j - -i o w ~ F. _ _ ~~~ i 1 I ~ e~ Spc/TH ~( ~ -~ . 25 ~ '~ 1 i•i ?7 / 24 - I i '= \~^ _ I I v~~~ I i I Ij ~ I, ~ ~ E 22 ' ~ 10 - - -- - - _ __ _-- - - -- - _ - _ _ _. 9~ ~ . ~ ' i ~ 8S ~ '; ~ ~ --t ~~ -' ~. - I s ,~ 4 ,' ~ ~ ~ s . a 37 39 36 32 24 ~ 17 10 ;tfA U W AAA Q~+V t .T. n G ~~ i ~ 16 c II .i 42 ~ 0 26 i' , _ o b _ F- 3 ti3 ~ 29 27 ~ al ~ ' 15 z ~i ~ ~ i• 2e ~ ~ 12 Z I6 e. ~ocMMe,eoow cr. y ,. 14 I 13 8 8 10 i u 12 13 Is i i 1 •~~~~N~~~~-efM v'S~6YA f.~.T E Q aL / ~! ~ O O a ~ ,2 E. KATELYN DR. ~ - 1' f' ~ ~' II -~ '.~ a le 17 I ~ A~ E '~L~ . I o e ~ ~ ~ N0. 3'2 ~ y Z 9 ~ '0 3p 7 g 2 13 C Iq ,3 J 1 z A ~ °' SI 1 I ~ 9 12 ~~., ° ' Iw ( i I o +- a C S 10 II Z 3 +2 (~ z E CHATEAU DR. ` n ., .-Lam'-T.~ ~ :.~-~- ~r--~ 3 ~ ~^. ~, CENTRAL REVIEW SHEET i •• DISTRICT ~~~ i t'HEALTH Environmental Health Division Return to: AU~ 2 s 19~~ ^ Boise DEPARTMENT ~~ ~ ~~ °~`~` ~~y~r-ill:er~l~ ^ Eagle i Rezone # ~' ~/`~J/vIj ~jjt, j'~:dG~ c~}~J' ^ Garden city Conditional Use # ~f"leridian Preliminary /Final /Short Plat ^ Kuna ^ Acz ^ I. We have Objections to this Proposal. ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. We can Approve this Proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: ^ 2 feet ^ 4 feet 7. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ~}-central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well a interim sewage central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water 8. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines central water ~-- 9. Street Runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ 10. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ I I. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store ,~. 13. S~ I'ie! CO..~I,~t~A/D.fl'7~c~.~' ~/' ,S'7 tom' yJti~'-~7C Date: ~/ ~-3 /~ `~'~N~~`'»' ~ ~~' ~~ Reviewed By: CDHD 10/91 rcb, rev. I I/93 jll ~, .CENTRAL n s~ xDISTRICT `~~'HEALTH DEPARTMENT MAIN OFFICE • 707 N. ARMSTi20NG PL • BOISE, ID. 83104 • (208) 315-5211 • FAX; 327-8500 To prevent and treat disease and disability; to promote healthy lifestyles; and to protect and promote the health and quality of our environment. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that the first one half inch of stormwater be pretreated through a grassy Swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality. The engineers and architects involved with the design of this project should obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals that could be used for guidance are: 1) STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND, State of Washington Department of Ecology, February 1992 2) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER AND SITE DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT 3) CALIFORNIA BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE HANDBOOK Prepared by Camp Dresser and McBee, Larry Walker Assoc., Uribe and Assoc., Resources Planning Assoc., for the Stormwater Quality Task Force 4) URBAN STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL Volume 3, Best Management Practices Stormwater Quality Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Denver, Colorado Sensing Dalley, Elmore, Boise. and Ada Counties Ado i eoa. c«wr otnce wtC troae • MeriaSa, amore ca.~y ontoe Bmore cowry oases va8ey covey orate 701 V. Amnttanq ~ 1606 Recerrs 520E 8th Street N. o(EnviroruneMd Health P Q 8az 1048 9oBe. ID..83104 8o4e. ID. Mountan Harne. !D. 190 S. 4th Sheet E . . McC~ ID 83639 Ernro. Health: 327-7499 83105 Ph. 334J355 83647 Ph. 587~t407 Mawtcn Hame. ID. . . 63d•119d Ph randy Ploruting 321-7400 324 Meridian. ID. 83617 Ph. 587.9715 . ~rvrn~atprrs 327-7450 83642 Ph. 888525 Nurtitiorx 321.1460 WiC: 327-1488 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS City Treasurer RONALD R. TOLSMA , GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE CITY OF MERIDIAN BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WALT W. MORROW JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Watte Water Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chie} MERIDIAN IDAHO 83642 Planner a Zoning Administrator ~ ~ WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JIM JOHNSON Phone (208) 888-0433 • FAX (208) 887813 ~~0 ~~~ airman -Planning 8 Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD ~ ' A~~ 1994 Mayor NAMPA & MERIDIAN '' ':i'~±;`: t iUiV [31STRICT TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: September 6. 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 8/15/94 HEARING DATE: 9/13/94 REQUEST: Annexation and Zoning BY: PNE/ Edmonds Constructi n LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North and east of Chateau Meadows East #8 JIM JOHNSON, P2 MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MOE ALIDJANI, P2 MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) JIM SHEARER, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ~° t<~ ~Ca....n.~ -CHARLES ROUNTREE, P2 ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION -TIM HEPPER, P2 CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH A~~ 3 ~ ~~~~t GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT -RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT y ~ ~ ~' ' ' BOB CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) -WALT MORROW, C/C U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) -MAX YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) _V'lATER DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF RECLAINlATION(PRELIR"", SFINAL PLAT) SEWER DEPARTMENT CITY FILES BUILDING DEPARTMENT OTHER: FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS:Nampa & Meridian Irrigation -POLICE DEPARTMENT District's Finch Lateral courses along the north _CrrY ATTORNEY boundary of the project. The right-of-way of the Finch -CITY ENGINEER Lateral is 60 feet: 30 feet from the center each way. CITY PLANNER See Idaho Code 42-1208--RIGHTS-OF-WAY NOT SUBJECT TO ADVERSE POSSESSION. The devel oper must contact John Anderson or Bi Henson at 466-0663 or 345-2431 for approval before any encroachment or change of right-of-way occurs. This District requires that a Land Use Change Site Development application be filed for review prior to final platting. Contact Donna Moore at 343-1884 or 466-7861 for further information. A11 laterals and waste ways must be protected Municipal surface drainage must be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must review drainage plans It is recommended that irrigation water be made available to all developments within this District. 'Bill Henson~istant Water Superintendent Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District ~~ ~~ 'ha~sr~ia. & ~1~i~idlacs ~Ifinigat~oFS Dca.~uct 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-888-6201 2 5 August 19 9 4 Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Tealey's Land Surveying Boise 343-1884 109 South 4th Street SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 BOlSe, ID 83702 Boise 345-2431 RE: Land Use Change Application for NW Otr Sec 5 3N lE Dear Tealey's: Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to file with the Irrigation District for its review on the above- referenced development. You were previously sent a complete packet of information concerning Land Use Change, urban irrigation, and exclusion. If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call on Donna Moore at the District's office or John Anderson, the District's Water Superintendent at the District's shop. Sincerely, DAREN R. COON, SECRETARY/TREASURER NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT DRC/dnm cc: File Water Superintendent PNE/Edmonds Construction Billie W. and L. Joy Brown City of Meridian enc. ~~ . ~~ ..~ .- - - APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., on September 13, 1994, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of PNE/Edmonds Construction, for annexation and zoning of approximately 22.66 acres of land located in the NW 1/4 of Section 5, T.3N, R.1 E, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is generally located North and South of Chateau Meadows East #8. The Application requests annexation with zoning of R-4. A more particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Dated this 22nd day of August, 1994. WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CITY CLERK R-4 _ __ i '~; , ____ . _\ -- ------_ RT ' _ - _ _ _ - .~ _ ro _-- ~.- -_ _-- -~ _- - ~ ~- - --- - ~ -- y-=-- p~~NNit~_A~N. R1 ~ ART ~~R~ `---~tT ~i ~ ---~ - - 1r - ' , `~ C:ARGL' ~~ J i i ;~ ~~ ~ RT RT R ~~ , , - --- - ----- -- -ART R-8 -- _ ~ ,1_.__ ~ - i fisw~ s " i~~ -- . .. ; .~ ; . -; , .._ __ __a__ --- fiR 1 _ ~:-- , i _ i i i +c ~• t ~1' j ~f~ k "a ~ _ ;,. ~ y ~ i ; t-~ ;"~El.o..t~K - ; `~`~---~ - ---- -- ---- ~ I mil t j~ ~„ - ~- RT ' ~ RT R ~ RT '~ ;;. ,. 2_ •, _ _- _ - __ i _ _ - - --, ,- ----- ---r------ -~ ~- - -- ----- 3 R8 RT ~ .- ~ - ~ -~ ~ ~' ! ~ -- -- "'~~ ~-r 1 ~ ! ~ TREASURE ' i -- ~'_ - ~ I ~ PlE,1SA ~T i ; ~ ~ ~/ ~ B::SthESS t, ! ~^ ~ ~~ V~~E ~~ R i ~ ~~ J ~ - _ ~ l ~ ~ . ~~ - I Cc~TEP. ' PW4SE ~ ' _ ~ 1 , .~ i --- RT ---1---- ---- ~ !-L . ;~ ,_~ _, ~ 1-f. - - ~Wfy sus 3iy ~ ~' :, PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE BROWN PROPERTY AN RATION 51105212980 51105212900 S1105233780 & 51105233782 Robert Minton Vern & Angelina Apeman Kevin & Irene Howell 2035 E. Ustick Rd 2101 E. Ustick Rd 6901 Emerald St Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 Boise Id 83704 51105244350 & 51105244300 S1105244550 51105212530 & 51105212485 Floyd & Kathy Reichert Fred & Ane Sharp Dixie Roberts 2575 N. Wingate Ln 2445 N. Wingate Ln 2855 N. Wingate Ln Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83542 Meridian Id 83642 S1105212810 S1105121040 S1105131450 Cleah Cooper Albert & Mary Dauven Marc & Catherine Perterson (Buyer: Vern & Angelina Alleman) 2820 N. Wingate Ln 2700 N. Wingate Ln 2101 E. Ustick Rd Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 51105131550 81384290360 81384300070 Burke & Linda Borup Matthew & Joani Casserino Paul & Lily Lamon 2640 N. Wingate Ln 2484 N. Laughridge Ave 2169 E. Lochmeadow Ct Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 81384300080 81384300090 81384300100 Jack & Leann Methner Wayne Stacy Delon & Shannon Makinen 2173 E. Lochmeadow Ct 2185 E. Lochmeadow Ct 2197 E. Lochmeadow Ct Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 81384300110 81384300120 81384300130 Bobby & Sheryl Howe Kevin Martinez Paul & Karissa Peterson 2194 E. Lochmeadow Ct 2190 E. Lochmeadow Ct 2188 E. Lochmeadow Ct Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 81384300140 81384300150 81384300190 Douglas & Noreen Miller Franklin & Victoriana Stout Michael & Janette Nersveen 2176 E. Lochmeadow Ct 2164 E. Lochmeadow Ct 2498 N. Meadowglen PI Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 81384300200 81384300210 81384300220 Kelly Hibbs & Robin Helm _ Randy & Eileen Williams Lorri Chapman 2518 N. Meadowglen Pl 2530 N. Meadowg}en Pl 2542 N. Meadowglen Pl Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 --~. 81384300230 John & Julie Suor 2550 N. Meadowglen Pl Meridian Id 83642 81384300240 Herbert & Adelia Pipkin 2457 N. Meadowglen Pl Meridian Id 83642 81384300250 Gary & Yen Stallones 2578 N. Laughridge Ave Meridian Id 83642 81384300260 81384300270 81384300280 Richard & Robin Toney Jerry & Philene Lewis Joseph Hageman & Amy IVliller 2562 N. Laughridge AVe 2525 N. Meadowglen Pi 2534 N. Laughridge Ave Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 81384300290 81384300300 81384300310 Jessie Stewart Robert & Melinda Draper Ian & Angela Ishiyama 2506 N. Laughridge Ave 2511 N. Meadowglen Pl 2489 N. Meadowglen Pl Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION APPROVAL & ZONING OR REZONE METtIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FILING INFORMATION GENERAL INFORMATION AUG 1 2 1994 CITY U1- t~LNIUg1~1V (PROPOSED NAME OF SUBDIVISION) North and est of ate, l~~e:dowc Fast # (GENERAL LOCATION) I~ i/a of Section 5 T 3N R 1 F and see adached (LEGAL DESCRIPTION -ATTACH IF LENGTHY) ~~~ Billie W and L Jov ILrovvn 888 3013 (OWNER(S) OF RECORD) (NAME) (TELEPHONE NO.) 2795 Wingate lane ~~,.~.._~ T~ (ADDRESS) PNRis Con_ctrvctipn 888 7255 (APPLICANT) (NAME) (TELEPHONE NO.) 3131 anarl~ Meri Ian Id (ADDRESS) Tealev's Land Surveying 385 0635 _ (ENGINEER, SURVEYOR OR PLANNER) (NAME) (TELEPHONE NO.) 109 S. 4th St ~~~~ (ADDRESS) ' (duxl~i.u1C:l1(JN{5) REQUIRING APPROVAL .Residential (TYPE OP SUBDNISION -RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL) 22.66 ACRES OF LAND IN CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP. (ACCEPTED BY:) .(FEE) _- -- TEl''_EY'S LAND SURVEYING August 12, 1994 A~Ieeridian pLmni~g Zoning Commission l~[eridiau City mil Meridian Id $3f~t2 i09 South 4~' Stre^Boise, Idaho 83702 (208) 385-0636 Fax (208) 385-0696 RE: Application for Annex with Concurrent g ` ~tletnen: 'This is an lcatian by PNI~fEdmonds Constnu~i~ seelring annexation with aa~nt g for 22.66 aeries ~ rmrth :and east of ~a It~eadc~ws East in lion ~ of Townslnp 3 lath, Range I East of the Boise i~~riclaa. We are ash titat this pra~e2 tye anrrex~ into the cif l~ridian with a ~ designation ~f R-~. T~ parcel is b~ ~ ~ west,:. ar~i Is~y on ttie south ~ the ~~ limits of the city cif meridian. T'lu; area. lyi west arm south of site t3eveloped with dwellings in an R$ ?_,v~. T'he situ as presently zed ` (Rural Trartsitian~, ,~ Ada ~`onnty .agricultural z~. Tire-site is agricultural land acrd it cxmtains a single farnaly dwe~g. The area surrounding the site is either develciping or is n~ developed with residential Wises. T'he li~eridaar: ~oreher>tsive P#an designees this sate for single htmr~y residential ~~ent l~evelppr~nt of this site will be in oom~lian~ with tine pa<ovisi~s of the h~rchan Cvrnpreeherrsive Plan aml' of the Meridian 2~ and S~davision t3ndnance. Al~c~ugh date ~ is r~ being sulunitted with tl~as armexatac~n request, at is our iatcntion to subdivide the payees far single-family nr~tial development. "~ ale sae#cing R-~' zoning designation as part of this request. This gdesig-motion, the a~conil~anying ~e~~~nt shards, and our des to °vid~ a gnalitY resit~ntial tlevelogment will ensure that his pal is develd in a manner whi+~h wiB be comps with the existing ~ pro;x3sed' devetctpment of the area Mtmacipal' services (sewer,.. water, '~ ~ s+OOls} exist in area immediately atijacent;to t~ sate. Sewer and water services wdl Ife extenc~d into the site. In summary,. we-are seelnng annexation of 22.6E sires intarthe ~ of Meridian. ~Ve.are ash that,. when armed, ~ Pagel` be given. a zoning designation of R-4. Altgh the /'1 (her prcfposat is consistent with the goats and policies of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and is c~mpatbte with existing ..and proposed development of the area,. VVe are r~~spectfi~tly submitting this. application for annexation and requesting a rerArnmendatian of agpr©yat to the City C:ouncit. Respectfully, Patrett A. Tealey TD'S B. /..el ,~~~-- Ted xutchinson AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST STATE OF IDAHO COUNTY OF ADA I, Billie W. Brown and L Joy ,Brotn7n 2795 Wingate Lane (name) (address) Meridian Idaho (city) (state) 1. That I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant mY permission to Wirt Edmunds and Ted Sigmont 3131 E. Lanark, Meridian, Id (name) (address) to submit the accompanying application pertaining to that property. 2. I agree to indemnify, defend and hold Me~i~ian and it's employees harmless from any claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements contained herein or as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application. Dated this 8th day of August I9 94 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day an~--y,~ar first above written. _.: - Notary Public for Idaho Residing at My Commission Expires: ~ (~ '~ o l 2- 9 4 F R I 1 4 3 4 C O L D W E L L BANKER ASPEN R E P ~ 2 . FROM ~'-yiART TITLE-MAtN ST.OFF TO 322'7826 P.04 !' •r•.v mot. • .v .v.;i1iR~" •r .. ~.~•-.w w.~~..v..M.v..v„v..c-. ice. ice. Y.:r.wr.. ^ +•..1•. W.av..L.q/..V.H. ~i..V ~..tA ~~? ~89v' WA-~RA~T'~ DEED ~• ~ 8836 ~ '- ~ 1 ~' ~.>; ~s~~ i.:~ cif [~ E4E0 L. ?+LI.~+~\ A~7 Rtia:' J. ~~i~~, '.'~47 ~1W :~~cr ~. r:~ ... ~ :~ Y~• the Gcm~r ..i<+ ic:~=•: jra: , R.r.~xxt. n^: a: s ::-..:y v:.:a '^i D+'1•LZa h. ia?JGCt1 • •$•••L• A~ hi"rS ~- :'!f C:a:r~e , M},na• a.+.:+rt•t. ;. 6314 Y_- P.E. , Eo1sc, I ~~ d:4o 63709 ~~ tt~:• it•ii~•,,•;11~ zirt,:+irt: r't1au. !.~•a.;. ~~ . SF~ :.E•.aT. Z+SC:~ai1:IV` d:.R.}iC.J = v... ~5r ~~~IS_r !~~ :.:: ;.~~ ~s a r~xr FG~.~oF ~s ~~ ~s 1 ~, .. ~: ' :~ ~: 7'NIS ~CtJMEn-T CORY tS FURt~~SNEO AS AN ~+ %Q ACS' KTIC+I. Tt~ C~1q?Al1Y 1YtAKES NO ~; R£PRE E:~TATlCN$ A3 TO !7S EFFEC7, ~' SUFFICIeNCY, COi-+iAE,STEF~sS 0R AMY 011iER MATTERS THr~T NSiC~t'! t ~E gEFERpEO FO OR M~ •c+•^~r. ::iro r •:• ~: ^~ (Mi'~lEO 7N:RE~N, SFf0Ul0 YOU HAVE '-N.a.! a! ~";'~ CtiE5Ti0N5 P~GAADIt~d© iTS EFFECT OR °~Ch:s'. i~'.~ CG • You -:A_f ~.~ ~: `tFGAZr~Ot~NSEI~•. ULO COnISUtT IMOEt~E'~dEAR ~~. t ~! Z-~p~r~' •. t:...!::• •x.'.t•• t%:~~: t!J@'."•'C* :C'.• .. t ~~ -.. .: .. ._ , •:..:.:•; !^..! :r:.t',t:' .r. .,:.:av :•: n. u" r. :~. ':~:6c::oa aeer!a;,n,,:a ::: .~` =c'~. *aic;sa:s r! ;feo:l. y-"e: a- :a::os t:a ~• »aC r_; a3.• ...:e:. San` t~.e :cistQaer_ r.a;s :.c- •w a;; ~ ~t s: _r +d ~A• •+t~~ tit ~~:•1' .... y .` J.. ,•._. .. .. •'A"•.1:•5,:. ~. • ~ i?a•::: ::?:' =~ • .S':S -~ :G :0 :3i'v. _::.ni. 9° ' t 5sc '#{ r rT~7` Qp ::•w}!0. CC't~?Y C}F .~<l~ ~t • ~~~ a7c nF~.~C~tf .Ceti:.: •' •~~~ I 0!+My~ tcr,:~ :1~: •~sa :ra:ru7T r•++! fc !er rtto:d !r (~ : a Ufa W! =46~ .'x:rro Rf _ - -- . •r. ,,; ~. a+artt rarer 9 eaek'.f'~ , i'•~'+• .r_ Ct1~v itlt~k~' "_.,,`..^--~;~ ;r:~ _~i/Ci"3ayof ~Cft~~ir... ~t }rGa:,s:. 3ft. ~ ~ - e. ~ S o . tt: and 6v:r :'aeor~oQ it ~ a!~ ~ ~ ....rr r t .'JCt: CY _ .~;Ati~r~ Tyr'-- ~~ --~~, iC,~~ ~ P; of . ti•••d,. a: ~xtt ~ ,,}y, • `~ is~a!:.r~!t•S.t1;7i~t4:a-:x+~~!.tl.'Z.:::-~,!~ ~ .1L'~r~ti t~ Y~ !!''.~ .,~ ~f i~•itffly:h''</ ~'+~. ~/ £t•a ..f'A ttoK•r •xf t .!, E\i 1TATiU~ AAi e~oe~ae• ~• _ _ Y f+~t i ~ r ~ ' ~ a,. :; "`'- 1 r. ?1x+::e: ~;~: i `: ~• r•r f y . ~ '~jryrt w ••.+ vC~'.ti ~ ~i. ~~..,.~ .,~.. ..~ ,~, ~,.A•••1 •n••+t• .. ~ A,•,• ~1 • ir' '•'~~'.tt'•e~ .. r A U G - St i , A U G•y 1 2- 9 4 F R I 1 4 3 5 C O L D W E L L BANKER ASPEN R E P_ 0 1 ' i~ ~` ~ i ._. ~ .,.. _ ,r.._,,,c ..• FROM S RT TITLE-MAIN 5Y.OFF TQ 3227826 P.05 ~'`~ l E:(t{IB~T "A" c~ ~~~ y~ p1!/ ~. • A ,~ CT OP LtWD SI 7CZ'EO Z!i TOi.'ltSl 3 NOR , IGE 1 ~ YORJiO, D ED AS LLOW $EG HG AT NA 89' SQ' k DISTAti~ su 02' 9^ Ens DIS: OF I~tNING; THEN '~ SOUx 02r o " EAS1'~A DI 1~~ ~ 36' S3r•• T A OI; SOUTH 0' ' •,4•I'" EAST ~Ot3'~`}i 6 9 •,3 t' 'r WEST D . 0' 13' 48" 6. 30' 26" a S8 ' "EAST 31• " £AST 25' S6' 8' 20" ASS OF BEGit'l~TftG. ?I~TFlWEST R Vp~ TItE . BOIS ~~~~ t r. 4K V - ~t~;~til"L+OT 3 i •~ 35.00 Fg~ T:NGE 'E 87 ~ FEET TIfE 42 s6 FEE HE?: E OF 314. ci; TKEttCE b 64 ET; TIjE3~E CE b 9.79 F 'L!?!{E2:CE 62 == THENCE ~' CEO '• ~~ 7" FEET: F`iCE ~+ TA}JCE OF 91;,5 -' ET: Tt?:,tr DI tCE 189.4 p,. "' tNCE A DISTAI OF 191:49 F^ ;~rir;~Cc J- DIST C£ 154.7 r EET TO TisE P.~;,L 5, tiTY, E 1 ro Jrr ~ / ~ ~ 9 T ' ~ ~ a h ~J S HE 274RTI .EAST QUARTER OF Tf3E 50{7THEAST Q;SARTER OF ?ei.*, NORTHWE i ST QUARTER ANO THE EAST HALF OF THE WOR W c ~' err OF THE SOUTHEAST E • QUARTER OF THE NORTHWcST Qt;ARTER OF SECT'O S, IN TG~~NS}{IP 3 NORTH OF RANGE , 1 EAaT OF THE BOISE MERIDIAN, IN ADA COUNTY, STATE OI" IDAl;O . Ah0 CODII~SENCING AT A POINT 335 -FEET kES; OF THE NORTHEAST COP?vER ' OF LOT 3 OF SECTION S IN ~'' _ , T7NNSHIF 3 t~ORTt?, OF RAI:GE EAST, OF THE $OISE-IKERiDIAN, IN ADA COUNTY STA ~~ , TE Oc ZDAHO, A23D' RUNNING THENCE ' ~.,~, / ~,• SOUTH 1320 FEET, MORE OR LESS, ZG TF:E SO+7T:i BOuA"JARY :,ZIP:. 0= SAID LOT 3; THENCE ~c:~, WrST ALONv THi S4U':H 80Gt:CkRY L.jI;E OF SF,XJ I,O'T 3; 55; ~~~ ..~- ~ FEET; THE23CE NORTH 1320 FEET :40RE OR :.ESS; Tri:1:CE '~=• ~ ` ~' EAST ALO::G THE TrORI'H LIFE O,e S,AID LOT 3 TO Ti?£ I'LFCE f~ , / ~ r l OF SEGS1~`IKG, EXCEPTI2;G e~'u$~IC }IIGH;;AY ~;D RI6}i:-C; -L;~,,Y Oz' T:1E 30iSE V j ALLEY Ri,ILhAY C01~;P?-~tY. ' AAD AI.50 EXCE?'I' T'r:I,T 20R:IOti L~iZiiG rC?::I OF Tii£ 1:OL_O~iI?:S DESCRIBED LIttE: • ' BEGItr12;-:G AT =-;, I:ORTHEAST CORNER OF GOVERJ;;;Ei;r Lp; 3: THr.,CE ' • SOUTH o9'3G' WEST A DISTANCE of 333.00 FEET; Ti~E:1Cr SO4'TH 0"02 r 59" EAST A ~ DISTANCE OF 8'76.63 FEET TO Te:E PEAL POi11T OF SEGINNIt~G OF THIS LZNE D:SCRIPTIOt:: TkE::CE J:Ci?':"r. 86.38' 20" 'rsiST A i~ISTA?:Ci OF ' 3C . 36 c EtT; 'Tsi~KC ; 2:O:t'liI i 5 • ' " , , , Za SG ti:ST ti CISTA,iC~ OF 192.44 =_~''' Tii=1=CS iiCRa:I 31' I7' SS" M'£ST A ' ~ DIS1 At:CE Or 189. <7 J'=_ ; ; TiiE'iC ?:pR:,t; S8' 3 5' S.ri" t•.. S'p.. A OF S9 . S 3 F ~4 ~~ CISTIU:C% = E': ; E'::': FORTt: " ' .. oo G 30 2?5" AT .O : ti^ '.. c_ _ ST A D.5TA IC. OF 135. ~3 FrE..r~ t,,OR_ r,et LE = ' • ' ... A30 T_~L' ~•.~ •~: ::. ~ Oi TL vE D~'SCRI:=7 ~:nl:j TitA»i e?:'D '1:L_' - - :ya=. ~ v +..w AIJG- 1 2-94 FR I 9 I T ~Ot-DWELL BANKER ASPEN R E P ~ 2 r' ti'^Y CO~QITMENT FO`R TfT~t: fNSURAf~ _' ~~tt ~I ~' '~" SCHEDULE C File Ntanber. P129784 The land referred to fn This Commitment fs described as follows: A TRACT OF U1ND SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE 601SE MERIDIAN, AOA COUNTY, IDAHO, DESCRIBED AS FOE.E.OWS: SEGfIdNENG AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT 3; THENCE SOUTH $9 DEGREES 50' WEST A DISTANCE OF 335.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH O DEGREE 02'59" EAST A DISTANCE OF 876.63 FEET TO THE REAL, POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREi 02'59" EAST A DISTANCE! OF 413.56 FEET; TH>NCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 38'58" EAST A DISTANCE Of= 314.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREE Ot'41" EAST A DISTANCE OF 648.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 31'56" WEST A DISTANCE OF 979.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREE t3'4g" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1343.62 FE£1'; THENCE SOUTH 86 DEGREES 30'28" EA5T A OfSTANCE OF f 35.83 FAT; THENCE SOUTH 58 DEGREES 35'55" EAST A DISTANCE OF 99,48 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 3t DEGREES 17'59" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1$9.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 76 DEGREES 25'56° EAST A DISTANCE OF 191.49 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 OtrGREE5 38'ZO" EAST A DISTANCE OF 154,36 FEET TO THI: REAL. POINT OF t3Et3lNNING. END ~ LEGAt. DESCtiIP'i'fON UST lG K -- ---- - _ lIL s ~ y '4 [~ - R I, ~ -~ 30 -~- AQA PLAN~4'i A~ 1'V. AUG ~ ~ ~ 94 z i , y ~~ Q I - 3 - 0 3' ~ Z F. -1 - I B~OGK SovrN I ~ G6 G,~ ~j~ ~ 25 1 '.I ~7 l 24 ~~ ~v ~ _- -- - ~ - _ - ~' ~~ ~ II ~ 12 _ ~___ ~ ~ -- - ~ ~D, ~ 22 1 to 1 ` o- 21 ~ i ~1 9 J lTE ~ ~ ! ~( ~ , 20 I~ ~ 1 I l 8$U~ V s ~ . _~~ - 18 ,~ g 37 ? ~ a 39 36 32 ~A U Z AAA 24 Q~1- ~ , .. { 1' I C• ~ ~ 42 fj 0 3 26 ~ ~ ~ ~ i •,~~ 16 • L 11 I.( ` i r3 a 29 27 - ~ I ~ ~ ~ _ ~ © 2e ~ ., I IS C ~ 12 LOCnMFaDOw Cr. a s to a 12 13 9 ~ ~, 14 13 S 6 .3 14 ~ i5 s • • • •• • • vSiLt11R B.A.T fi lta~ -~ d 7 12 w O/ E. KATELYN DR. -°~, N ~ A E / ~l ' ` ~J i ~ I~ ', n '~ ~ ~~ e 4 .e ~~ . ~ ~ ,~ o g 10 3 7 z 8 O ui 13 Q N0. 312 ~ z 2 A ~q 3 J a ~ ~ ~ g ~ i2 > W 4 I W s ( o t- 1 I c C, S 10 11 Z 3 O2 Z z E CHATEAU DR. CERTIFICA OF PROP R y pO~Trtv[; I, _Ted Hutc in on ,certify that I personally posted aNOTICEFOR P I .I(' HF.,4RIN(; at 2795 Wingate Lane notifying the public that the site was the subject of an annexation and zone request. This notice was posted not less than one (1) week prior to the public hearing. Boise Idaho 83702 (208) 385-0636 ~ ea nutcrunson Tealey's Land Surveying 109 South 4th St. `~- --~ ~ _-- ~ -- - j s~ y '4 n~ - --- -~ 30 ADq p~Ah' ~ h ~~ '~~ -N. AUG ' 2 y 19gy -3- . 29 ~~ Q ~ o 3' ~ !' ~ 2 F. -t S pvTN I I , BLOOK ~ ~ , . ,~ ~.~ 25 ,7 24 _ . i ~ '': 14 ~ \ -~ ~~ - - ~ ~~ I1 / t2 - ~-_ _ ~ ~ ~ gL0' 22 ~ 2 10 ~ ~ a 21 ~ I 9 ~ TE S ~ I ~ t Es ~( ~ I 20 1~ ~ ! BSUI _ ~ ' ~., 18 ~ g ~" ~' ~ ,- • ~ } , a 38 32 24 ~ i IQ EAU Z µf A Q~+V ~ ~" t. ~ W ! !~ 16 ~ • 42 ~ 0 26 ~ _J7-i , • ~ 1 ~ ~3 D a P9 27 - i ~ 15 ~ \~ -~ i z t © 28 ~ v I 12 >CnwEADOw C7. ~ J t ~ 14 13 >i to a Iz Is K • • • •• •w - ~s~uw u.s rti it ~~. ~ a ~ t2 E. KATELYN DR. -;, v - ~ ~ f~ W , tg n . ~s A~ E 1~~1 tt .' . . g ~~ 3 2 j N~. 31? 9 10 7 8? t3 Q J n APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION APPROVAL & AUG i 2 lQ,~,~ ZONING OR REZONE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION C ~ ~ Y ~ l~ f~i L' #$ ~ i tii' I. GENERAL INFORMATION FILING INFORMATION ~ricvrv~~1) NAME OF SUBDIVISION) North and east of Chateau Meadows East #8 (GENERAL LOCATION) '/a of Section 5 T 3N R IE and see attached (LEGAL DESCRIPTION -ATTACH IF LENGTHY) ~'ealev_'s_ Land Survev'ng 385 0636 (ENGINEER, SURVEYOR OR PLANNER) {NAME) (TELEPHONE NO.) 109 S. 4th St Boise Id (ADDRESS) (3URISDICTION(S) REQUIRING APPROVAL Residential (TYPE OF SUBDIVISION -RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL) 22.66 ACRES OF LAND IN CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP. (ACCEPTED BY:) (FEE) TP'~`,LEY'S LAND cos South 4~ sty Boise, Idaho s3~o2 SURVEYING (208j 385-0636 Fax (208) 385-0696 August 12, 1994 Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meridian City Hall 33 E Idaho Meridian Id 83642 RE: Application for Annexation with Concurrent Zoning Dear Gentlemen: This is an application by PNE/Edmonds Construction seeking annexation with concurrent zoning. for 22.66 acres located north and east of Chateau Meadows East #8 in Section 5 of Township 3 North, Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian. We are asking that this parcel be annexed into the city of Meridian with a zoning designation of R-4. -. _ . - - - -- - The=parcel- is bonded on the west,: and martially on th~ south by -the corporate limits- of the city- , - -- of =It~eridian. The area lying west and south of the site has developed with single family .dwellings in an R8 Zone.. The site is presently zoned. RT (Rural Transition), an Ada County w_:.~_._..~~.._J..= ri~u~~~a]. zee 'Z'~~ ~i~ i~_agricultuzal land, and it contains a single family ;dwelling. ~.~'he _ _- ,_._~_.___ _._ area. surrounding the site is either developing or is already developed with residential uses. The Meridian Comprehensive Pian designates this site for single family residential development. Development of this site will be in compliance with the provisions of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and of the Meridian Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. Although the development plan is not being submitted with this annexation request, it is our intention to subdivide the parcel for single-family residential development. „_ - - , . We are seeking the R-4 zoning designation as part of this request. This zoning designation, the accompanying development standards, and our desire to provide a quality residential development will ensure that this parcel is developed in a manner which will be compatible with the existing and proposed development of the area. Municipal services (sewer, water, public streets, schools) exist in the area immediately adjacent to the site. Sewer and water services will be extended into the site. In summary, we are seeking annexation of 22.66 acres into the city of Meridian. We are asking that, when annexed, the parcel be given a zoning designation of R-4. Although the /'~ Our proposal is consistent with the goals and policies of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with existing and proposed development of the area. We are respectfully submitting this application for annexation and requesting a recommendation of approval to the City Council. Respectfully, Patrick A. Tealey Tealey's Land Surveying B. Ted Hutchinson STATE OF IDAHO COUNTY OF ADA AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST I. Billie W. Brown and L Joy,Brown 2795 Wingate Lane (name) (address) Meridian (city) Idaho (state) 1. That I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant mY permission to Wirt Edmurids and Ted Sigmont 3131'E. Lanark, Meridian, Id (name) (address) - _ .-. ~` ..T°y --to strbt~;ti~ aeen~ri~a~g-appiicatiorr-pertaining to that property. 2. I agree to indemnify, defend -and hold Me~i~yan and it's employees harmless _~~~~r~ __; -.~. _ _r_~.__.~r~~ c~.~or-~.ilit~ result~z~g from any dispute. as to the--s~~e~ne~r,,ar~~ined .~ _._. .._ herein ~ ~ ~ u or as to the o~c~nership of the property which is the subject of the application. Dated this day of August 8th SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the Notary Pub Residing at 19 94 first above written. for Idaho My Comnussion Expires: ~ l ~.~` '- ~ ~-~ 1 2- 9 q F R I 1 4 3 4 C D L D W E L L B A N K E R • -ROM 5 ART TITLE-MAIN ST. JIFF TO A S P E~jrN~ .AA.y t.~.:• .Y !!::~% /Y y/ ~~~~~ t?..Y.iV N.II. //. JLG t ~ E P 0Q ~~~ ~s9~' ~zx wA,~RA1TY DEED `~• FLED L. nLli??,~~ A~7 A~~:.1. ::.~-L~~, •c~ ''`- w sw..w~~ AW :~,ct +. yI' tM Gcan~t ..k+ iti-~=•: Via: , ttc`u:a..vt: +:.,; :::..;y '~i .,.:~. i s:t.LIz, 1i, 3?.C~~1 dXD L• .+'GT 3cZr~c,\, ~ s . • ~t •'',,f :!:r C:a ~~e , ahe..• a.i:i:r~. ;- 63I4 t'_^ P.Q EoisC. 1t! s') •-• •, :~a X3709 ~, ~1 +trY tt•iiC`•a•:!7~ tir.,ai•1;; ,'t:~71H. '.••a!. ~. ~•rtI' T~'~t+5C'•iFi+:itl~ A:.•;C~i.,~ W _::~ ~~~ ~:: A RRT i'~~ ~s ''' ~ ~• ~ ~: ' ~ ~: '1'}*JS DOCtIMEn~T CORY !S FURNlSNED IBS AN ~; ~C~'M--'~~yyOaT10, {. Tt~ i~ApANY MAKFS k0 ~ A£PR£Si:.'~TAT1cN8 A9 T4 irS £F~ECT, ~ ~~ St1F~iCIeNCY, ~~ MAITEAS 7N~T M ~~ ~REr+E~R~ TY ~ k:. .~~-~,.::,~° ,. ~;. JMRt,1E0 i'N~R JIV. -w..:: e: ' C1!£ST~©fit5 ~;,~;AADJNa _iTS °EfFBCT OR _'CJ~-. , ~,~~ ~~ ;~: ~~ (!dPACt Y0t! SNOt~,rO CONISU~T JJMDEPEtdp£NT .:A~f ~. / , A ~'. ~, .~ LEGAL ~OSaNSEL. = `~t / 1 ~-p~ ...: .. :.. -_.:, w:e •-!;_m~~1e. eer'~.. .tip C' .17t: ~~"S rl,~C •'G~_:P a .~ ~- r ..w: ~:: r r. . t~ t. ti u r tit:7.. !~~*io':i";1 !'•:t .CECS• J..t.i. :a:.i; C.e ti• :. :~C:.Q~ aAbtt!!;,n,,.• ::: ..~ ...'.Via ~•tts? L f sLtZY usr. ~ .~.. s:.. . h. •t~ jtC~V.ie ~ Q ~a:s .. .~ ••t 1:. ;t. !-tom' ., .~ ..7 :.. • • ::. .. ' • A Ltitt r~ ~~r{ ..i-~~ y:5 ~~•~ EIlid„s ~.,,.,, 33sC'{v1!1"!6`C. S"s ~.:s:i •~,A,~' .:~t-,..w., ~~ '•ti Y !i. fit. _ ~ ~ ~~ ~'/~_ r' :;••.K tt.i.; Cif ::'w~14. CC'L'~'TY G~ .~<~~/ ,~:! .~ ~~ ~7~ OF_ ~ca~ „~..`. CeL:.: • ~ . + 1 orreT etr,:7• ::fa: •~u :ra:-ua ~•~t re !er rtcC: d ~ , .~~t~:t aie.J::a t!n~ ro. ~~ is~• :':c?'vz~u•'__?6 '.- ..~_.•r. r: y't,•a3ns:er rar n ~• ~'•'~"a ..._ ~ [a~~v fiirkef -•-•.. `.~ :•`•.('u ~G ct °~ of LG~ L- !mss' FGri:,e:''~"~i--~r~~L ~-~ • t~~ . a -::~•F i':.:.t. ;f ~11~~ fr. m) 6lZ.y: aM du:y reeoretd i. ,x•k ~: ti .:~'" y "Rw~ ~_~~ ti' lid iw~..t•;? g•k.6;a•..~~4: a::w~ ~!,.~; L.::R='_t} r~L1~r~ ~i t - it • .a.~~ m ~ c :~s: tx•b ..e:o tcoker f.~ F\iT.TtATitl~a)Ai? e.•••, ••1.- -~ fivtl +~~.. .. ... A A'••.• N•.1..~..,~ .. ~ ~..- ••A '.w..^.• 1.. : j .••- •M'•'.•Y•'Y. •f1' '.L .. yy..~..r: •t: r • ~~ ..w.... ~ - ~ 2 u~- 1 , A UG.- 1 2- 9 4 F R Z 1 4 3 5 C O L D W E L L BANKER ASPEN R E~ P 0 1 • r ~ , .i - , • FRAM S T TITLE-MAIN SY.OFF TO 3227826 P.>a5 • ~~ b:(HIB.T "A" A ~. CT OP L1WD SI s~ED Z?i 'SHE K~ ~ ST R OF ECTZON 5, • TOh'N$2 3 NOR , 7G$ 1 Ir:AS THE BOI$8 Ri t, ADA OV2iTY, ID71H0, D ED AS LLOW /• ' `SEG NG AT Nn RtiER O v'E~~2i LOT 3; Tti t E • 89' S0' k DIST712iCE 35.00 F>~ T:?iCE SO 02' 9" 1+115 DZST 'CE 87 ~ FEET TIfE L I'OitrT ,~ ,' OF 'I~iNZNC; TNEH '~ /~ / SOUP 02' o EAST~Af OI 'CE 41 Sb FE HEi: Nd ~ 3fi' S3".•• T ~- bIS E OF 3I4. sET; TKEt1C ~~ SbUTri 0' ' •.4.1'" 1rAST K1jC F 64 ET; T}~.Et;~E ~ S0~ 59' r' " WESTA DISTAN iCE .'9.79 F-+T,;~TNEI:CE ~-~~ N H 0• 3' 48" 62 ?IiENCE ~-~"- SOUT 6' 90' 26" A DIS CEO `•~ , 3 FEET: ~:Cr 507 H 58 ' " EAST A TWICE of ~ ET; Tt?~lt = ~ ii 31' r~ EAST DI ` JCE F'189~-F_ "::.:iCE •~/ y'~. SOU 25' S6' A DISTAIt OF 191:19 F= ;~iiE::Cr SOUT 8' 20" AS~A DIST E 154.3 EE? TO TisE P.:+L F ' .T OF BEGIt:I~F tG. • ~ T~ ~ ~ ~ RT THE 2i ' ' ;` a ! 1 ~+IkA 0 I .EAST QUARTER Ot , THE 50UTNEAST Q;3ARTER OF ?iiE NORTHklEST _ _e._.,. rt _. QLIARTi.R,AND THE EAST HAI~,F t~F ?H£_:+~3RT#iW£I' +R?:R OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTIiWiST QUARTER OF SECT_OI: • 'S, ZN TG~~NSHIP 3 NORTH, OF RANGE 1 EAaT OF THE SOIS£ ,_ _ MFRIDZAN, IN ADA COUNTY, STATE OF IDAHO. Ah0 _ _`"`~`..• -' - M ~--_ .R ~._ _:~. _ _ ---- ._ COf't'l:EI3CI2tG AT A - POINT 33 S .FEET A'ES. OF ?HE 3~~;tfihEAS. COPIER ,` w OF LOT 3 OF SECTION 3, IN TOWNSHIP. 3 i+ORTI:, OF RA2:GE S EAST •~~,,~~ ~ , OF THE $OISE-MEZIDIAN, IN ADA COUNTY, STATE Os IDAHO AND /~r~ , RUNNING THENCE ~,,,~., / ~• .~ SOUTH 1320 FEET, MORE OR LESS, ZO TE:E 50JTR BOUIr'DARY :,ZN's 0: SAID LOT 3s THENCE v. "'~''~ WEST ALONv THE SOUTH 80Gt:C74RY L.I?:E OF SF ID I.OT 3; 55: ~'~"' ~ FEET: TIi£'3CE NORTtI 1320 FEET :40RE OR :.ESS; ?s'sI'1:CE '~?+ EAST A.o;:G THE hORTK LIFE O.r S.AID LOT 3 'r0 Ti?E Fi} CE OF ~, , ' ~ . BEGIIti`ING, EXC'PTIt:G 5~ur3]rZC IiIGk~AY e-I:D RICI?:-CF-KAY O' ~ THE 30ISE VALLEY RAILKAY COT~:pa.~tY. ' Ai`D ALSO EXC:r?:' T-AT PQR:IOt: LYING T\C?;H OF ':KE FOL:Ot:I?:^ o DESCRIBED LIi1E; ' BEG2r~:s:!:C AT = -;, t~ORTH>:AST 'CORNER OF GOVERi,;;;;,i; r L•0:' 3 • T:i~`:CE ' SOUTH o9'3G' WEST A DI:TF~NCE OF 333.00 FEET; Ti~E::C= • SOUTH 0"02'59" EAST A DISTANCE OF $76.63 F£.r.T TO•:1 P.raL FOi1iT OF $EGINNY1iG Or" THIS LINE DESCRI>~TIO:i: T??E::CB i:Ce?':"r. Sa' 38' 20" riEST i. D_*ST+~?~CE OF ' 3; . 36 FBE: 2~_r:c;, t;o:~•: I ; y • a:,' 5G" c~:ar t. CIsTANcE 'o~ lsl. a~ _ _~: ; . TiiEt:CE 1vCRa:I :1' I7' SS" :EST A DISTANCE Or 2S8 . G? F.=: ; TiiE'IC J:OR?* S8'35'SS" t•:rST•A L`ISiAt:Ci OF 59.43 F.',t E " NOs~.TIi oo G' 30' Z+S" ::r5T A >r:STi1:7CE OF 135.c3 FE£7 A'.7RE 4R • . , :O ::s?, :::':: _ 'c, OF T::= b30vE UL'SCRIE'D y;nZ:i Tii.~Ci ? ::? '1'L.' ~ - . A U G- 1 2- 9 4 F R Z { ~~~ ~e Number. P129784 X 1 7 C O L D W E L L BANKER ASPEN R E C~,~ITMEN't FO-R TITLE tNSURA~~ SCHEDULE C The land referred to In this Commitment is described as fotlows: A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE BOISE MERrDIAN, ADA COUNTY,10AH0, DESCRIBED AS FOLI-OWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT 3; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 50' WEST A DISTANCE OF 335.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREE 02'59" EAST A DISTANCE OF 876.63 FEET TO THE REAL, POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREE 02'59" EAST A DISTANCE OF 413.56 FEET;. THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 36'58" EAST A DISTANCE OF 314.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREE 01'41" EAST A DISTANCE OF 648.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 31'56" WEST A ptSTANCE OF 979.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREE 13'48" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1343.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86 DEGREES 30'26" EA5T A DISTANCE OF 135.83 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58 DEGREES 35'55" EAST A DISTANCE OF 99.48 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 31 DEGREES 17'59" EAST A DISTANCE OF 189.47 FEET; THENCE. SOUTH 76 DEGREES 25'§6° EAST A DISTANCE QF _191..49. FEET; '~HENOE SOUTH 86 DEGREES 38'2" EASTA DISTANCE OF 1$4.36 FEET TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. ,• P - 0 2 ~~ END OF L€GAL DESCAIP'T10N _ __ _ _ _ R-4 __ RT 'RT __ _ ~ --, ~ --------- RT ~~ , ! pL~,NNINQ A~~' R? !RT ~ ~:R~ -` ~iT. _ ;' ; , _~ ~' 199 ~-- _ ~--;. _ _ _ RT ! L 9 - ~- ~--• --- -~ ~;~~ i i . - - - RT RT R :~_ -ART R-8 ~' ;~; -,~ ;' a_ . -; ~. .; ~.--r~~ ~ --~ ~" : ~~~~~ 1 --fit--- - RT g i :- ' --- '~!_ • • -~ _. _ _ .. .. . ..- ~`_ ~ ~~! _ ~; ~, 4 .. , ,.. ~'; _-- R-4 -- RT ~ L-O ~r.= - =. RT ' R ' RT ,. -- 'RrASJRE , ~ -- -- -- -- _ - VALLEY ~ ~ ~ ~/ ~ B::S~hE55 !f . ----ti _r._ C RT~ ; --- ~ RT -- ! -- ---- -L ~ 1-L :: , PT /-L v.~T ~G ,f; -L - A D' 30 29 ~ }- IC __,(3: ~F r ~, BLOU( so~TH ' • jC?'.~ ... I L6 G~ 25 ~ r~ ~ '~ l 24 - I i ~: ~ ~ ~~ -~ ~~ ~~ II / 12 -- -- ~ ~~ -- _- - - - ~_ \- --~C ~ 22 ~ 10 ~ a, _ 21 ~ I ` 9 ~ ~ ! E~ - ~ _ _ __: ___ - ___ i _ I I ~- s$U ~ '' 18 ~ q Sa S/ " '-34 - 37 '~ ~ ~ ~ ' a 39 38 32 24 x I~ ~ 10 f 4A U Z ~A Q~ ~ •T• ~ l W 4 42 ~ 0 26 ` _~~ ~ ,''n 16 L II f+ '~ o ' 3 r3 a 29 27 ~ .A ' IS ~ 2 / ~ z ~ © 2e ~ ,~ ~ 12 `` I :. IOCMMEp00w CT. 9 ~ 14 ` 13 8 8 10 a 12 13 w ~ i ~ •~• •N •• •N~y* - 4 S 6 :3 I4 ~ t3 I -~{ a ~'46UA C.~.T 61tQ~1.. .. O ~ a ~ 12 E. KATELYN OR. ;, „ - ~~ f~- W 4 le 17 , ~ q~t E ,~~~ II o e I ? W NO 312 ~. 9 i0 3 p 7 8~ 13 C ~ Z 2 A ~4 ~3 d ~ ~ 9 ~Z ~ la. 4 ~ W ~ I C 5 10 ~ II O 1- ' ~ Z 3 2 z ~ E CHATEAU DR. 3 ' r1 ~ -r---r--, - -,-~- - s ~ R~ ~- AD,q PL~R~If~j;,~cn, ~, ; ~~~. ~r~., f T i ,~ I, Ted H ~rchinSOn ,certify that I personally posted a NOTICE FOR P B .I(' HF,4 Rlwr at 2795 Wingate Lane notifying the public that the site was the subject of an annexation and zone request. This notice was posted not less than one (1) week prior to the public hearing. 1 ea tiutctunson Tealey's Land Surveying 109 South 4th St. Boise Idaho 83702 (208)385-0636 JST /G K ~ - - S`, A L~. - R I~ -~ 30 -~- ADA P~~~';d! ~~-N. AUG 12,94 z~ a >~- Q _3_ 0 3 -~ 1 F. I _ K 2 ~ '1 ~ l e--oc Soc/TN ~ ;I ~ 25 iii 24 ?7 ~ o` ` IS ~~ w ~~ II `• 12 _ _ ~ -- - ~' ~ 22 ~ ~ 10 2 ' ~ 2f ~ a 9 S ~-rE ~ E~ ~ 2~ I~ ~( j 8 U( s ~ V 18 ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ; a s7 39 36 32 24 I 7 10 , ~/; 16 • r, 4z ~ o ze ~ .~ , ~ II ~ o ~ ~3 ~ t 29 27 _ 15 .n ~ / I ~ Z I © 28 ~ .i i ------•~_ ~ 12 ` LOCMMEpDOw CT. ~ -~ s ~ 14 13 a g to a 12 13 a4 ~ O O -~ E. KATELYN DR. ~. f~ ~~~ W ~ E ~ ~ n I~ a le n r s ~ L .,1 o e ~ NO 3'2 Z g 10 3 7 8 2 O 13 C 4 .3 I J ~ ` ~ 2 A ~ a ~/ '~ ~ 9 IZ > 4 I 1 4. W I ~ ~ 1 Q C S 10 11 Z 3 02 _Z 2 E CHATEAU DR. ~ ... .. - - - ~~~- -r-_ 3 OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART. Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney /"~ HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner 8 Zoning Administrator ~~~~~~~'~ JIM JOHNSON Chairman - Planning H Zoning GRANT P. KINGSFORD ~~ C ~ ~ i~~4 Mayor ~j'ry OF MERIDIAN TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Conunission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: September 6. 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 8/15/94 HEARING DATE: 9/13/94 REQUEST: Annexation and Zoning BY: PNE/ Edmonds Construction LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North and east of Chateau Meadows East #8 JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P2 CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z .-TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR -RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT -POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY -CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: n APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION APPROVAL & A~~ 1 Z 19~~ ZONING OR REZONE C Y'r Y +lj j= yf L' !~ I I.11 t~ iy MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FILING INFORMATION I. GENERAL INFORMATION ~rtcvrvsCL NAME OF SUBDIVISION) North and east of ClLateau Meadows East #8 (GENERAL LOCATION) _~/'/a of Section 5 T 3N R 1 E and see attached (LEGAL DESCRIPTION -ATTACH IF LENGTHY) Billie W, and L. Jov Brown 888 3013 (OWNER(S) OF RECORD) (NAME) (TELEPHONE NO.) _. ____ _ =- ~~ ._ ~ . ;__ _ ...2795 Win4'ate Iane ~Vleridian Id ,_.~...a...Y.,n__ ___..._.. _ (ADDRESS). ~'NE~Edmonds Co~tnichon 888-7255 _ , . _ .._. :(TELEPHONE N0 ~ ~~ _~~..__.,.. 3131~I.an *~c Meri ;an Id (ADDRESS) " Tealev's Land S»rvEw;,,. 385-0636 (ENGINEER,)SURVEYOR OR PLANNER) (NAME) (TELEPHONE NO.) 109 S. 4th St ~•~ Id (ADDRESS) (JURISDICTION(S) REQUIRING APPROVAL _Residential (TYPE OF SUBDIVISION -RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL) 22.66 ACRES OF LAND IN CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP. (ACCEPTED BY:) (FEE) August 12, 1994 T6.1LEY'S LAND S~IRVEYING Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meridian City Hall 33 E Idaho Meridian Id 83642 109 South 4'" Strp~•t Boise, Idaho 83702 (20L, .i85=0636 Fax (208) 385-0696 RE: Application for Annexation with Concurrent Zoning Dear Gentlemen:. This is an application by PNE/Edmonds Construction seeking annexation with concurrent zoning for 22.66 acres located north and. east, of Chateau. Meadows East #8 in .Section 5 of __ Township 3 North, Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian. We aze asking that this parcel be annexed into the city of Meridian with a zoning designation of R-4. ___ __ ~, ._ ~__T. __. ___ ~.._ _._._ .__ _ ~ _ TM ~`~ ~"°$'te _ } is ~totmded- vn the `we'`st, and P~ _-- part~ily on the south. by ~th+~ corporate Limits. of the. city _ of Meridian. The area lying west and south of the site has developed with single family ..dwellings in an R8 Zone. The site is presently zoned RT (Rural Transition), an -Ada. County _. _~.. .~~xculbual.ezone~. ~ ~~ .,~_. ~._-- __~~ .~ _----.__--- e_. ____~_ _- ~._ _ v _-:--~ _-_ .~__ area surrounding the site is either developing or is already developed with residential uses. The Meridian Comprehensive Pian designates this site for single family residential development. Development of this site will be in compliance with the provisions of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and of the Meridian Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. Although the development plan is not being submitted with this annexation request, it is our intention to subdivide the parcel for single-family residential development. We are seeking the R-4 zoning designation as part of this request. This zoning designation, the accompanying development standards, and our desire to provide a quality residential development will ensure that this parcel is developed in a manner which will be compatible with the existing and proposed development of the area. Municipal services (sewer, water, public streets, schools) exist in the area immediately adjacent to the site. Sewer and water services will be extended into the site. In summary, we aze seeking annexation of 22.66 acres into the city of Meridian. We are asking that, when annexed, the parcel be given a zoning designation of R-4. Although the /'~ Our proposal is consistent with the goals and policies of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with existing and proposed development of the area. We are respectfully submitting this application for annexation and requesting a recommendation of approval to the City Council. Respectfully, Patrick A. Tealey Tealey's Land Surveying B. Ted Hutchinson n AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST STATE OF IDAHO COUNTY OF ADA L Billie W. Brown and L. Joy,Brown 2795 Wingate Lane (name) (address) Meridian (city) Idaho (state) 1. That- I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant my permission to Wirt Edmunds and Ted Sigmont 3131 E. Lanark, Meridian, Id' (name) (address) to submit ~th~rvaccompaii~ing apgllcatiors p'ertainiiig to' ghat property. -- 2. I agree to indemnify, defend and hold Me~i~ian and it's employees harmless Y ..~},~.-=- .,. _ --_°,..;~~' car ,li~~l.~~..~.~~ ~}tC~1S.~L~:xe ~.~ ~~1, thr~r.~men~a~~nra~n~.~,.,~=. herein or as to the ournership of the property which is the subject of the application. Datedthis. 8th day of August 19 94 ~l SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day an~y.~ar first above written. Notary Pubic for Idaho Residing at My Commission Expires: ~ (~-~` ._ ~ ~~ 2-94 FR I 1 4 34 COL DWELL 8~1NKER ASPt=rr rct r _ • -ROM ART TITLE-MAIN ST.OFF TO 3227826 P.04 ..w.y 5~.. :• .Y lJ.~ •J•. ~y~~J•.iV N./r..Y..M.V..V.Y..I.I~.I>•..`Y.:Y.M. w.M~.AI.H .L. h/..Y.Ir.:~I..V ~.SA ~ /~~• a~ WA~~tR,A.1T~ DEED ~~ 8836?2 ~, M F:~ED L.:ail.L~i1\ A~'7 A~~:' J. ;:=.E~L~~.s:~::?.~w Ate} :,,ee / ~; tM Cic:m~,r , .~+ tty... ~.r; . e.~:~u:t.. ni: +:....,.:y ~`.:a ((( r! +• sil.Lls fi. i?1Ctt1 ,~,~ L...~2' 3t'i:'Jlr\, ,v.gs~;~ r ,s:• ADD his.. • ,;ii G~ :!:c C:a:r~c , t,hMC a c.±+,,.~• :. 6314 1'L:..-, Pd. ~ Eoisc. Id:3o 113709 ,e~, ~ ~~. ~i ~` ~: 7'HJS DnCUMEit-T CORY 1S FURN{SHEp AS AN ~~ ACCCMr'~ ~-T10, t. T~ 0(,'~IFA1~1Y MAKES NO Q ~~ R£I'R£$E!~YgTJCfVS AS TO ITS EFFECT ?"I` Sl1FFiCkNCYr C~P~TE~~ OR ANY OTHER ~IAT'f£RS THAT MiOt?F £E REFERiR1cD TO OR Msro:: o~ IMPl1F0 TNEREi{~. SNOULa YUU HAV£ =iGfi~s' i;'.~ CG ' }''. CU~STtOMS REGARQ1At{~ iTS IFFEC7 OR _ ' ':~,:e ~.~ , 9 M. ~: _t ~ ~ ~~ 1`dPACT YOU SNC?ULO COIdStJtT IINDEPENDi:~!'C t.EGAi. ~Ot~NSfl. ~~. /-. Z.~ ~ ~ .r .,L~ vo . ~.. ... .._ t .. .r Sai ._r...: .t .. 7 . : r .. . •• .a . -.. .i. -nJ,. txra~t traawe•irr.• :: vco:d. •attMs'.A r' ;Ctor3. yr-e:4..a:.~5 t..d ~...~/ :~. .'.~ .4... tttl! L:.C il•~S~QYtT. .CMJt.S '.::.. t:1 1:C ;tt !t4'~' .ti ..t~ jr~'•'ij~• S~ .; 4:.::f:a: L:.v ~ a ~.' ~.r.~. •... • ' . .. ~ '7 - ~ . L . t_ .. ~.~>-.,,~o k "a~ ;'. i~+~~.a..ys .-~.-~ ,,,....:t.. •_ .w wOiRrtt~` ,, 3~C"t'_i~T?0\, - ~~_aY'nA'r°~~~'z~°~, a ~~G Si's ` } •^.~' ~;}~~C~~'LE:7G~:g\7-ik:.+~L'a. rT.~YE CAF ::w}IQ. CC•l~'?Y OF ~~ i`~ .n ~<l .r i !e:ray ~:~ :~a: •ti a :ra:-ua vet >e !er rreo: d ~;;T:QF_._tsa~o Cep.; .,._ +, ~•~ ~ .,~,,,,,.• ~..~.. t1 e::h• ry;H: td ~il'~J'.:R T~7~C ' V. ~, •r ' •'~~• :`r +sa:•o! ~ t`s~..._. De:r'a rrt _ •~•~-• J r: ~,• a~nr~i rarer/ e:cek T~ir... ~. :c ...__ ~ Cs~ ~v fiirkts _"' ~ '-•,:~'y ~G ~';"3., o: tC.~ (,-•I .'~s~ ~K.~,~-i;---~r~ L .-~ ~ ~~ T t a -~'~"F ~':.+.c. ;1,1~ a mr 4 ~r: and 6v:y :sroreeQ i. ,x~k r;~~:kd ~ta ~t ~j ~a ire •~ : . C ~r;,y. i;~ t~ v E\i ~ATitl~' I}A~' ' . :ham:. e.'.~ r: w.: •+-:t.!~~ ~ : C :.5: / w .. ~ a'.'jtA ;•t'Or:ef j .~ ,;. .. . . Z .';art r; Z ~'~r •A..r ..~.. ..~ .n..~..A..,ti .A..~. - - alb:::e; • ;: ~~~ ` ~. v i.Ya v'C°.1•.1' .. . ~ ~ .JA. 'A •rr •.1•wY. .A.. •.6 .~ yti..r..~: Y: r b L t u~ i i , A U G•- 1 2- 9 4 F R I 1 4 3 5 C O L D W E L L BANKER ASPEN R E P_ 0 1 .', ' ~ ~~ ~ti.~ ~ *7+~•~+iyP...~.~.wu-t •. rw, ....r•,~e•r. a~.r...w~. -.. -~ ~' -. ;,r• .~.~. r.: r.-' ~ ~~ ....~ .. _ . ~~_ ~^' - _ ., o ± ~++. ~ , .._y..~.... FR(3M S T T 1 TLE-MAIN Sr . ~F TQ 322?826 P . B5 ~'~ :~ .. EXHIB.T ".1" 11,~ CT OF INiD SI 1CTEa ZH FIE NO .• ST R ~F £LTZON 5, • TOi,~t$i 3 NOR , tG£ 1 F.AS TIiE. BOISE RI t, ADA QU2;?Y, • YDAHO~ D ED AS LLOW ' `8EG NG AT N~ RttER O vE~~}i 9 ; Ttt t~ • 89' S0' ~ DIST11}ZCE 95.00 FE ~:NCE ., SO 02' 9" Tr11S DIST 'CE 87 ~ FEET TFfE L Z'Oa}t'r ~•~' OF L`tNING: TNEti •~ ./~ SOUT OZ' o " EAST'A DI 'CE 41 5b FEE HE}: }.O ' 3 fi' S3~.•• T A DIS E OF 314 , cET; TNEItC Q SdUxH 0' ,,41 EAST n}rC F 64 ET; T}jE}~E P~~ N S'l~`}i 509' 1x'48 "WEST JCE .'9.79 Fr~'T.!Ti{Et:CE ,r-~~ • ~ " A OISTAN 62 . ?HENCE ~~ SOUT 6' 90' 26" A DZS CEO •~:. , T PEST: ~:CE ., _ S ~I :58-.. ~ ~r EAST A TAJtCE OF~~~'+...~ ET: T}?E;I -_: '- ~ H 31' "EAST DI tCE' F'189.4~F_ : ". sNCE •U ~. SOU 25' S6' A DISTAIi OF 191:49 F^ ;~}iE2dCE SOUT 8' 20" AS'T~A DIST £ 154. ] t EET TO Ti'iL P. nL F ' .T OF EEGItit~T 1C. ' ~} T~ ~ { *"9 THE ?tORT2?EAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST Q:SARTER OF TtiE Stlv~}~ NORTHWEST QUARTER ANd T}iE EAST HALF OF ?x£ WORTHWEB? Qe+RTER 4F THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECT_Oi: • S, IN TG:~NS}tIP 3 NORTH, OF RANGE 1 EAST OF TH£ 8025% MERIDIAN, ZN ADA COUNTY, STATE of iDAFio. At~a ~ • _. ~ -;-e .-~---0`OMB:Z3iS-~T~i~~~I~•1`_.~.~~.~~~,M O.F...Z"KE,.IC"OZTfitASi `~0~?~ER.. u.~m_ ' ~ ter, ` OF LOT 3 OF SECTION S, •ZH T~wNSHIP. 3 I:ORTY., OF RAS:G:, M EAST, _ OF THE BOISE-MERIDIAN, IN ADA COUNTY, STATE Os IDAHO, A23D' -,/. RUNNING THENCE ~„~, % ~,• SOUTH 1320 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO TEE 50+]T:i BOuNDAR: 1Z2rJ 0: ! ~ SAID LOT 3s TIiENCE v~ WEST ALONv THE SOUTH 84U}:CkRY LZ}:E OF $F,ID I.OT 3; 55: ~~ FEET: TH£!~CE ' ~'~ti%,,,,,_ NORTH 1320 FEET MORE OR LESS; ?h*t:CE ~~ ~~~~?+ EAST ALO'.:C THE NORTH LIME Oe $.AID LOT 3 70 Ti?r I+i.ACE OF BEGINNING, ExcEPTIi,G ?UB~IC H2Gri~AY e,}:a RZCx:-c=-kAY o- *' • ~r/~ T:iE 30ISE VALLEY RAILhAY COKPaNY . At;D ALSO EXC:r?'?' T-AT POR:IOti LYZhG rC?;:~ OF TiiE FOL_O~CI?:v • .' DFSCRIB.3 LIIS~: ' ~ SEGIt~:t:}:G AT : -?, 2~ORTHEAST CORNER OF GOVERH;;E}:1' LOT 3 ; ' T4E`:CE ' SOUTH o9'3G' WEST A DZbTF,NCE OF 333.00 FEET; Ti~E::C= • SOUTH 0'0259" EAST A DSSTANCE QF 8'16.63 FEET TO•T~E PEAL POi11T OF BEGINNING OF THIS LINE D:SCRI~TZO::: TKE::CB 1:Ce?:"r. b6.38'20" HEST i, i)3STA2:Ci OF '3y,36 t'E'.:;. TsiE}~C?, 2:O:t:i} i 5' $,",' SG" tiF~T t. CISTAvC°_ Oi 192.49 %rE': ;, TiiE1:CE 1vC?ii :1' 17' SS" y:EST A L~ISTAt~CE OF 189. G7 Fc=" TiiE'1C°_ }:O??s; r8' 35'Fs5" S•:E CISTAJ. r`•T. ~~H- .,•• ST •A Ci OF 99.48 F.. ..'•. tti0RT1: oo"G' 30' Z'S" ::TST A ir'.STA:2CE OF 135 . c3 FEs'Y A'.rjR= CSR _• ' • .0 ::i?, ;:p~'" _ :E Ot TH= J.30vE y:.'SCRI:=] ~:nl:t TiL\Ci ?::D •s .L_.:.. r .. :yaar.•. '. F-aux.,-' 1 2-94 FR I • v ~... ~ j,. •.^~ Fie Number. P129784 9= 1 7 C O L D W E L L BANKER ASPEN I~ E~ P O '2 CO~erTMEN~T FO`R TtTLi; INSUAA/'`~ ,, '~kk SCHEDU[F C The land referred to In this Commitment is described as follows: A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED tN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE 801SE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, lOAHO, DESCRIBED AS FOU.OWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT 3; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 50' WEST A OtSTANCE OF 335.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREE 02'59" EAST A DISTANCE OF 876.63 FEET TO THE REAL, POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREE 02'59" EAST A DISTANCE OF 413.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 36'58" EAST A DISTANCE OF 314.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREE 01'x1" EAST A DISTANCE OF 648.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 31'56" WEST A DISTANCE OF 979.78 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREE 13'48" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1343.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86 DEGREES 30'26" EAST A 0t57ANCE OF 135.63 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58 DEGREES 35'55" EAST A DISTANCE OF 99.48 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 31 DEGREES 17'59" EAST A DrSTANCE OF 189.x7 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 76 DEGREES 25'58" EAST A DISTANCE OF 191.49 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86 DEGREES 38'20" EAST A DISTANCE OF 154,36 FEET TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. ,~ - ~`-~. ENO OF LEGAL. DESCRIPTION ___ ~ ,i . R-4 _ _ RT 'RT _ _ ~ --~ •~ RT -~= -. - - - - -- i PL~NN11~6 AS~iJ• R1 ~ !RT ~:R1 -_ ~T , j ~9g~ ~ ' ~_~ --- ~ ` ~ `~ R1 RT ' w~ - _ - - ------ ~._ RT _ ~-____ '' f _ i . ~ ~~~ i RT RT R , _ _ _ - J ___ _ -_- . -. -- ~ I ~ `-T--. 1 1. ~RT R- 8 - `\ / ~ ~ -_ ~~ ~ poR~ s ~ _ gg ~ -~ ~ ~--, ~ _ ~ ~- "ems-11yi / .-~"E ~1GF i.St~~ -. V ji'C'~~ ' ~~ ' _ ~t~`-s _ , . , - _ 4+ ~,1 ^-- RT L-O ~~ T-- RT '~i RT ' R' RT ,; .. 2 ` ____ - - -- ---- - - -- - -- -- - - -T- -r---, ~-- -- - ---~ ~- ' ~ ~ ~ ; i , R8 ~ ~ !' -3 RT , .__ ~ - -REASURE~~~~~-r _--1 i -- ' PIE:aSA.'~ T y r ~ ~ ~~ ~ BUSthE55 '~ ~ . ~~ ~Prr~SE -- RT -- " - - ~~ --- ' `~` ~ ----- - -- RT-- - 1-L ~~ I-L i-L - ___-__ v s r l c ,~ _ ~ ~ -- - s~, ,ao~ R I - ~ -~ . 30 -~- ADR ~'~AN "di ; I r ~ ~~ly ' AUG t 2 f994 J 2 , 9 ` ~}- C . ~_ ~ ~F r-- ~ ~i i -L - ~ ~ BLaclc ~ S pl/TH ~ ; '~,~~~, 6 ~ L G~ , 1 1, 25 ~ ~~~ ,, I 24 r \~~ . ~~ ~ ~ ~ i! / 12 BL- ~ 22 ~ , ~ ~ 10 ! ; ~ a 21 ~ 9 E„ ~ _ _ ~. ___ _ ._ ._ _ I ; 20 I~ / 1 ~ ~ ~ BSU. ~ ~ ~ ;~- ~~- IS ,~ g 37 ~ • ~ ~ ; a 39 36 32 24 ~ h 17 10 u z ~A ~~ ~ ~ , ~ 42 q W ~ 0 26 ~ . ~-~ , ~ ~ ~.'n 16 - • I I ~ ! .i 3 r3 o a 29 27 _ ~ 15 ~ l z // ~ 2 ~ © 2e ~ ~ '' 1 12 :. ~OCMMEa~Ow CT. f s ~ 14 8 e 10 I~ 1 2 13 K = ~ i3 ~ t t S 6 :3 li ~ IS + • • •~• -~! ?~ ~ -••i ~N ~ - _ v'S6tiAC.~.TBQQ~ ~ O O , a ~ 12 E. KATELYN OR. •;, ,, - I~ f~ ~ ~~ W 11 q le n l ~ A~ E 11 '~ I~l~ o e z N 12 g 10 32 ~ 8~ I3 W Q 0. 3 Z 2 A ~ iq ,3 d s~ ,~ r i ~ ~ I 5 9 ~2 ~ ~ 4 i O w Q + ~ 2 ~ , E CHATFGII 10 11 Z nQ 2 3 ~ `- n I, Ted Hutchinson _ certify that I personally posted a NOT7 . FOR P B •I(' H .ARIN at 2795 Wingate Lane notifying the public that the site was the subject of an annexation and zone request. This notice was posted not less than one (1) week prior to the public hearing. Teti Hutchunson Tealey's Land Surveying 109 South 4th St. Boise Idaho 83702 (208) 385-0636