Loading...
Packard Subdivision AZ PP~Op~( BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PNE/EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION AND BROWN ANNERATION AND ZONING GOVERNMENT LOT 3, SECTION 6, T. 3N. R. lE. B.M. ADA COUNTY IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for consideration on September 13, 1994, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and was tabled to October 11, 1994, for a subdivision plat to be submitted, and the Planning and Zoning Commission having heard and taken oral and written testimony and the Applicant appearing through Ted Hutchinson, and having duly considered the matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of public hearing on the annexation and zoning was published for two ( 2 ) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for September 13, 1994, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the September 13, 1994, hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations. PNE/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 1 .~-~ ~`°. 2. That the property included in the application for annexation and zoning is described in the application, and by this reference is incorporated herein; that the property is 22.66 acres in size; it is located between Locust Grove Road and ME ~'~ n~ oad and between Fairview Avenue and Ustick Road; it is northeast of Chateau Meadows # 8. 3. That the property is presently zoned by Ada County RT (Rural Transition) and the proposed use is requested to be for R-4 Residential type development. 4. The general area surrounding the property is either developed or is proposed to be developed. The land is presently used for agricultural purposes and there is one house on the property. 5. That the property is adjacent and abutting to the present City limits. 6. The Applicant is not, as of the date of application, the owner of record of the property. The owners of record are Billie W. and L. Joy Brown, who have granted permission for the annexation and zoning request. 7. That the property included in the annexation and zoning application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 8. That the entire parcel of ground is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 9. That the Application requests that the parcel be annexed and zoned R-4 Residential; that the present use of the property is PNE/EDMOND3 FINDINGS OF FACT ~ CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 2 ~ ~ for one house and for agricultural uses; that. the applicant indicated that the intended development of the property is for an R-4 type subdivision use; that the Applicant did not submit a request for approval of a subdivision plat at the time of submitting the application for annexation but has now submitted an application for subdivision approval; that Ted Hutchinson stated that Chateau Meadows was adjacent as was Chamberlain Estates; that he had questions on access to Ustick Road; that he had no problems with the comments of the City staff; that he had met with ACRD; that the density was unknown; that there would be a mix of houses; that there was no problem with pathways and some park space; and that lots around existing houses would be 1/2 to one full acre. At the end of the hearing he stated that Wingate Lane was narrow and tree lined and access through Wingate would not be wise; that the parcel abuts Chamberlain Estates and roads will probably align with the roads in Chamberlain Estates; that it is not their intention to access Wingate Lane; that flood irrigation would be replaces with pressurized irrigation; that there was no plat because they were trying to work out plans, particularly for access. 10. There were several property owners in the immediate area who testified about the Application; the testimony can be summarized as follows Gt yr a. Butch ewe testified that he resides in Chateau Meadows but wants development limited to single level houses; that there was a waste water problem in the area; the northeast corner of Chateau Meadows is used as waste area; that there is a water problem; drains should not be tied to irrigation; that the south line should be waste ditch. Mr. ew also testified at the end of the ,$icvr PNE/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 3 n hearing that he did not have a ground water problem b. Bob Howe testified that he lives in same area as Butch Sewer; that he desired french drains w/single level houses; wants same view that he has always had; that foxes in the area should be caught and moved. c. Vern Alleman made some comments towards the plat of the proposed subdivision which had not been submitted at the time of the hearing and stated that when the plat was heard he would testify again. d. Albert Dauben stated that he lives across from access road to the existing house; that he desired a berm hill and fence to protect his property from the development; that there would be a problem with houses backing on Wingate Lane; that he was not against subdivision but Wingate Lane must be protected. e. Betty Jo Paremoe wants the Wingate private lane maintained; that there is a road association; that she likes the rural and quiet area as it is and desires no change; she wants a safeguard for privacy. f . Dale Sharp stated that ~~(he was opposed to the subdivision because of growth, traffic and problems for the schools; she wants Wingate Lane kept private; that she wants the subdivision bermed off and separate; that she wants Wingate Lane fenced off; that the lane cannot take more traffic. Mrs. Sharp testified at the end of hearing that she questioned pressurized irrigation and that we do not need more houses. g. Floyd Reichert stated that he wants annexation to happen; that Wingate Lane is illegal; that the easement should be kept open; that he desired two story houses; that there were no restrictions on Wingate Lane. h. Helen Sharp questioned a zone change with the generality of the proposal that had been submitted; that she desired a plan to be presented; building has created problems but nothing is being done about it; she wanted to know what was being done about parks; she stated that Wingate Lane is a private lane and people do take care of it; that there was not enough information to make a decision; she questioned whether this zone change complies with the Comprehensive Plan; that no more students could go to Chief Joseph elementary school; that she was opposed to growth with no planning. i. Susan Smith testified that she wants private lane PNE/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 4 rte, lam, quality; that she does not oppose the subdivision; that she want there to be no usage of Wingate Lane; that there is an informal road association for Wingate Lane; that should be no additional usage for Wingate Lane. j. Mick Dauben testified that there is too much growth in the area and that he desires a plan for the subdivision. k. Shirley Shy stated that she apposed the subdivision and that there was too much traffic on Wingate Lane. 1. Mark Peterson that he lives across the street from the majority of subdivision with 5 acres he thought; that he desires a berm; that the lot size should be limited in size to 5 acres; that he wants a country setting. m. Don Bryan testified that people are fighting access to their lane; his concern is the traffic flow; that traffic should be sent to Fairview and not Locust Grove Road; that development is not causing traffic to go to Fairview; drainage of roads should not go to irrigation drains; drainage should not be to the South Slough. n. Rick Schultsmeir testified that he lives in Boise; that his mother lives on Wingate Lane; that the quality on Wingate needs to be .preserved. o. Barb Borup testified that wished that the quality of growth could remain the same; that the City makes the final decision on Wingate Lane; that she has a lot of questions about Wingate Lane. p. Sheryl Howe stated water is his concern; that there is water under their house; that the ditch behind them needs to be tiled. q. Larry Sale, Ada County Highway District representative, testified that Wingate Lane is a private owned by some or all of the people; that it could become public at the owners' request if ACRD to accepts; that the Lane could be condemned; he does not anticipate that condemnation would occur; that some road water can be discharged into drainages but not live irrigation ditches; that he suspects ACRD will ask for a stub street to Ustick Road; that the traffic in the center of the section will be drained to arterials; that he thought there would be no public street connection to Wingate Lane. 11. That the property is in an area marked on the Generalized Land Use Map of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as a single family PNE/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 5 ~ ~ residential area; that in the Comprehensive Plan property inside the Urban Service Planning Area may be developed at greater densities than one dwelling unit per acre. 12. That in the Rural Area section of the Comprehensive Plan, Land Use, Rural Areas, Section 6.3, it does state that land in agricultural activity should so remain in agricultural activity until urban services can be provided. 13. That Meridian has, and is, experiencing a population increase; that there are pressures on land previously used for agricultural uses to be developed into residential subdivision lots. 14. That the property can be physically serviced with City water and sewer if the Applicant extends the lines. 15. Meridian City Engineer and Meridian City Planner did submit comments and such are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. That the Meridian Planning Director stated that the application was consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan; that a bike/pedestrian pathway is indicated along the northern boundary; that a non-combustible fence is required along the South Slough prior to construction; that perimeter fencing is required prior to construction; that a development agreement is required as a condition of annexation. 16. That the City Engineer commented that the legal description included as Schedule C to the application should be used for the annexation ordinance, if approved; that the property is contiguous to the City limits; that water and sewer were PNE/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Pac,Ze - 6 available; and that public /'\ access would be .provided when Chamberlain Estates No. 1 develops its eastern boundary; and that Wingate Lane, a private Lane, provides access for the present owner along with other property owners adjacent to the Lane. 17. That the Ada County Highway District, Meridian Fire and Police Departments, Meridian School District, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, Central District Health Department, and other agencies did not submit comments, but when they are received they shall be incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 18. That the R-4, Residential District is described in the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 3 as follows: R-4) Low Density Residential District: Only Single Family Dwellings shall be permitted and no conditional uses shall be permitted except for Planned Residential Development and public schools. The purpose of the (R-4) District is to permit the establishment of low density single-family dwellings, and to delineate those areas where predominately residential development has, or is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, and to protect the integrity of residential areas by prohibiting the intrusion of incompatible non-residential uses. The (R-4) District allows for a maximum of four ( 4 ) dwelling units per acre and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian. that the R-4 zoning district requires a minimum of 1,400 square feet to be included in houses in that zone. 19. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Residential Policies, 2.1U states as follows: "Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi-family, town houses, apartments, condominiums, etc. ) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities." 20. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, PNE/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Paste - 7 ~ /"~ Rural Areas, 6.3 c., it states as follows: "Within the Urban Service Planning Area development may occur in densities as low as 3 dwellings per acre if physical connection is made to existing City of Meridian water and sewer service and the property is platted and subdivided . 21. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Rural Areas, 6.4, it states as follows: "Residential development is allowed in the rural area provided that said development does not exceed the Rural Residential Agricultural density, unless it is inside the Urban Service Planning Area and City sewer and water is provided, then Low, Medium and High density residential may be considered. All residential development must also comply with the other appropriate sections of this plan." 22. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Housing, Housing Policies, at page 66, it states as follows: "1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile homes, multi-family, town houses arrangements), ." "1.3 An open housing market for all persons, regardless of race, sex, age, religion or ethnic background." "1.4 The, development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping centers should be encouraged." 23. That there is a population influx into the City of Meridian at the present time which has been going on for some time and is likely to continue; that the land is relatively close to Meridian and economic conditions are making it difficult to continue farming in the area. 24. That the City Engineer has previously submitted comment in different applications that a determination of ground water level and subsurface soil conditions should be made; that such a PNE/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT ~ CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 8 ~ ~ comment is equally applicable to this Application.. 25. That in prior requests for annexation and zoning in this area the Zoning Administrator has commented that annexation should be conditioned on a development agreement including an impact fee to help acquire a future school or park site to serve the area and that annexations should be subject to impact fees for park, police, and fire services as determined by the City and designated in an approved development agreement. 26. That in 1992 the Idaho State Legislature passed amendments to the Local Planning Act, which in 67-6513 Idaho Code, relating to subdivision ordinances, states as follows: "Each such ordinance may provide for mitigation of the effects of subdivision development on the ability of political subdivisions of the state, including school districts, to deliver services without compromising quality of service delivery to current residents or imposing substantial additional costs upon current residents to accommodate the subdivision."; that the City of Meridian is concerned with the increase in population that is occurring and with its impact on the City being able to provide fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services to its current residents and to those moving into the City; the City is also concerned that the increase in population is burdening the schools of the Meridian School District which provide school service to current and future residents of the City; that the City knows that the increase in population does not sufficiently increase the tax base to offset the cost of providing fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services; and the City knows that the PNE EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT ~ CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 9 .-~ increase in population does not provide sufficient tax base to provide for school services to current and future students. 27. That pursuant to the instruction, guidance, and direction of the Idaho State Legislature, the City may impose either a development fee or a transfer fee on residential property, which, if possible, would be retroactive and apply to all residential lots in the City because of the imperilment to the health, welfare, and safety of the citizens of the City of Meridian. 28. That Section 11-9-605 C states as follows: "Right-of-way for pedestrian walkways in the middle of long blocks may be required where necessaa ksoorbshon innvareast pedestrian circulation to schools, p PP 9 the pedestrian easement shall be at least ten feet (10') wide." 29. That Section 11-9-605 G 1. states as follows: "Planting strips shall be required to be placed next to incompatible features such as highways, railroads, commercial or industrial uses to screen the view from residential properties. Such screening shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') wide, and shall not be a part of the normal street right of way or utility easement." 30. That Section 11-9-605 H 2. states as follows: "Existing natural features which add value to residential development and enhance the attractiveness of the community (such as trees, watercourses, historic spots and similar irreplaceable amenities) shall be preserved in the design of the subdivision;" 31. That Section 11-9-605 R states as follows: "The extent and location of lands designed for linear open space corridors should be determined by natural features and, to lesser extent, by man-made features such as utility easements, transportation rights of way or water rights of way. Landscaping, screening or lineal open space corridors may be required for the protection of residential properties from adjacent arterial streets, waterways, railroad rights of way or other features. As improved areas (landscaped), semi- PNE EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 10 i-. ~''~ improved areas (a landscaped pathway only),. or unimproved areas (left in a natural state), linear open space corridors serve: 1. To preserve openness; 2. To interconnect park and open space systems within rights of way for trails, walkways, bicycle ways; 3. To play a major role in conserving ardraina nes and natural value, especially waterways, 9 natural habitat; 4. To buffer more intensive adjacent urban land uses; 5. To enhance local identification within the area due to the internal linkages; and 6. To link residential neighborhoods, park areas and recreation facilities." 32. That Section 11-9-605 L states as follows: Bicycle and pedestrian pathways shall be encouraged within new developments as part of the public right of way or as separate easements so that an alternate transportation system (which is distinct and separate from the automobile) can be provided throughout the City Urban Service Planning Area. The Commission and Council shall consider the Bicvcle-Pedestrian Design Manual for Ada County (as prepared by Ada County Highway District) when reviewing bicycle and pedestrian pathway provisions within developments. 33. That proper notice was given as required by law and all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission were given and followed. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met; including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. PNE/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Paae - 11 .-e 2. That the City of Meridian has authority to annex land pursuant to 50-222, Idaho Code, and Section 11-2-417 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that exercise of the City's annexation authority is a legislative function. 3. That the Planning and Zoning Commission has judged this annexation and zoning application under Section 50-222, Idaho Code, Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Meridian City Ordinances, the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the record submitted to it and things of which it can take judicial notice. 4. That all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been complied with. 5. That the Commission may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and State. 6. That the land within the proposed annexation is contiguous to the present City limits of the City of Meridian, and the annexation would not be a shoestring annexation. 7. That the annexation application has been initiated by the Applicant, PNE/Edmonds Construction, and the annexation is not upon the initiation of the City of Meridian. 8. That since the annexation and zoning of land is a legislative function, the City has authority to place conditions upon the annexation of land. Burt vs. The City of Idaho Fa11sL 105 Idaho 65, 665 P.D 1075 (1983). 9. That the development of annexed land, if annexed, must PNE EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 12 r~ /'~ meet and comply with the Ordim~r~ces of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-61b rich pertains to development time schedules and requirements, 1.1-9-bO5 M, Piping of Ditches, and Section 11-4-6fl6 B 14., which pertains to pressurized irrigation; that the Applicant would be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer; that the develop~t of the property would be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance; that, as a condition of annexation the Applicant would be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the devel~~nt agreement shall address the inclusion into the subdivisi.+an of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, K, L and prior connnen~s of the previous Planning Director, Wayne Forney, relating to the lack of adequate recreation facilities and that land seg. aside for a future park would be desirable, that the City is in need of land set-asides for future public service use; that thew development agreement shall, as a condition of annexation, require that the Applicant, or if required, any assigns, heirs, executors or personal representatives, pay, when required, any development fee or transfer fee adopted by the C~.ty;, that there shall be no annexation until the requirements of this paragraph are met or, if necessary, the property shall be subject to de-annexation and loss of City services, if the requirements of this paragraph are not met. 10. That proper and ade~,uate access to the property has not been shown. 11. That since the Apptcant's property is in an area marked PNE/LDMONDS FINDIN{3S OF FAQ & Ot?NCLUSIONS OF LAW Page __ - 13 as a single family residential area, the annexation and zoning Application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and does not conflict with the Rural Areas policies; however, there are very large lots across Wingate Lane that shall be buffered by the Applicant and the subdivision covenants shall let the home owners in the proposed subdivision know that those lots are there and that the buffering must remain; that this matter shall be addressed in the development agreement. 12. That the development of R-4 as suggested by the Applicant is not compatible to the homes across Wingate Lane; that R-4 development would be compatible with the lots and homes in Chateau Meadows and Chamberlain Estates; that some type of transition development between the Wingate lots and the Chateau Meadows and Chamberlain Estates lots needs to be put forth for .the development of the property. 13. Therefore, based on the Application, the testimony and evidence, the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian, it is ultimately concluded that Applicant's property should be annexed and zoned, but the actual zoning of the property should be left up to the City Council as the Commission does not feel comfortable in having the entire parcel zoned R-4; that in the period before the City Council hearing the Applicant should make it known that it desires to have the portion of the land abutting Wingate Lane zoned at a much less dense zone than R-4, such as R-2, to provide a transition between the acre, or more, lots along Wingate Lane and the R-8 lots of Chateau Meadows PNE/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Paqe - 14 ~"1 ~ ~1 annexation, when annexed, and if not so tiled the property shall be subject to de-annexation. 17. With compliance of the conditions contained herein, the annexation and eventual new plat to meet the transition between acre or more lots and R-4, would be in the best interest of the City of Meridian, but the Application should be tabled to allow the Applicant time to submit another plat. 18. That if these conditions of approval are not met the property should not annexed. 19. That if these conditions of approval are not met the property should not annexed. 22. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind the applicant and its assigns. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONER HEPPER VOTED~~ COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE VOTED COMMISSIONER SHEARER VOTED ~-~ COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI VOTED 6--- CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) VOTED PNE/EDMONDS FINDINGS OF FACT ~ CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 16 ~ . n. _ ~. V i GLENN J. RHODES, President SHERRY R. HUBER, Vice President JAMES E. BRUCE, Secretary TO: PNE/EDMONDS 3131 LANARK MERIDIAN ID CONSTRUCTION 83642 k~i f -_p ¢ S 9 November 10, 1994 FROM: Karen Gal he Co dinator Developm s SUBJECT: PACKARD SUBDIVI N - PRELIMINARY PLAT On November 9, 1994, the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District (hereafter called "District") took action on the Preliminary Plat as stated on the attached staff report. In order that the Final Plat may be considered by the District for acceptance, the Developer shall cause the following applicable standard conditions to be satisfied prior to District certification and endorsement: 1. Drainage plans shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. 2. If public street improvements are required: Prior to any construction within the existing or proposed public right-of- way, the following shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District: a. Three complete sets of detailed street construction drawings prepared by an Idaho Registered Professional Engineer, together with payment of plan review fee. b. Execute an Inspection Agreement between the Developer and the District together with initial payment deposit for inspection and/or testing services. c. Complete all street improvements to the satisfaction of the District, or execute Surety Agreement between the Developer and the District to guarantee the completion of construction of all street improvements. ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 r /7 ~ _, INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE PACKARD/DSTECH GLENN J. RHODES, President 11-9-94 SHERRY R. HUBER, Vice President JAMES E. BRUCE, Secretary TO: ACHD Commission DATE: November 4, 1994 FROM: Development Services SUBJECT: ANNEXATION AND PRELIMINARY PLAT - Packard Subdivision Meridian (Developer - PNE/Edmonds Construction, 3131 Lanark, Meridian ID 83642) (Engineer/Surveyor - Tealey's Land Surveying, 109 S 4th Street, Boise ID 83702) FACTS & FINDINGS: 1. Packard is a 128-lot single family si ed north of Fairview Avenue and west rent annexation/zoning request is. tion. The site is bordered by the Kearney Place on the west, Morning Carol's on the north. 2. GENERAL INFORMATION: lbdivision generally locat- of Eagle Road. A concur- also part of this. applica- existing subdivisions of Dave on the southwest, and LEAD AGENCY - Meridian ZONING - existing RT, requested R-4 FEET OF NEW PUBLIC STREETS - 6,400 LOTS - 136 total, 128 buildable ACRES - 39.87 ESTIMATED VEHICLE TRIPS PER DAY - 1280 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE - 265 L.F. OF FRONTAGE ON Hickor Avenue - 60 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP DESIGNATION ADA COUNTY RIDGE-TO-RIVERS PATHWAY PLAN - EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY - 60-feet REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY - 60-feet Hickory Avenue is improved to a 41-foot stubs into this site. - Lacal No pathway shown street section and IMPACT FEE BENEFIT ZONE - West Ada IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - Western Cities ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 PRELIMINARY PLAT -Packard Subdivision n November 4, 1994 = Page 3 continue to maintain those public roadways located within the annexation area. 9. This application is scheduled for public hearing before the Meridian City Council on December 6, 1994. SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: 1. Extend Hickory Avenue north to the intersection with the stub street from the west (Meadow Wood Drive) as a 41-foot street section with 5-foot sidewalks within 60-feet of right-of-way. 2. Narrow the southern leg of the Hickory Avenue/Meadow Wood Drive to 28-feet with the. construction of a conversation cor- ner. Coordinate with District staff. 3. With the exception of the southern most lot on the west side of Hickory Avenue, direct lot access will be restricted on Hickory Avenue south of the intersection with Meadow Wood Drive. Said lot shall locate its driveway 5-feet south of its northern boundary. 4. Construct all internal streets (excluding Hickory extended) to a 37-foot back-to-back street section with 4-foot sidewalks within 50-feet of right-of-way. 5. Construct the stub streets with landscaped islands (Quixotic) and eastern stub from Packard Avenue) with a minimum face-to- face width. of 20-feet on either side of the island. The land- scaped islands shall be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. 6. Direct lot acces to south side of Katelyn Drive shall be re- stricted for the following six lots: Lots 10, 17, 18, 25, 26, and 33, of Block 8. 7. The District will not sign the plat for any part of this subdi- vision until the adjacent street system (Hickory Avenue) that it connects to becomes part of the public street. system. STANDARD REQUIREMENTS• 1. Street and drainage improvements required in the public right- of-way shall be designed and constructed in conformance with. District standards and policies. 2. Dedicated streets and drainage systems shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards. and poli- cies. . PRELIMINARY PLAT -Packard Subdivision n November 7, 1994 Page 5 stalled when the motoring public. 13, A right-of-way street and utili way. Contact file number) for project street is first accessible to the permit must be obtained from ACRD for all ty construction within the public right-of- Construction Services at 345-7667 (with zoning details. 14. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any require- ment or policy outlined herein shall be made, in writing, to the Manager of Engineering Services within 15 calendar days of the original Commission action. The request shall include a statement explaining why such a requirement would result in substantial hardship or inequity. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. STAFF SUBMITTING: Karen Gallagher DATE OF COMMISSION APPROVAL: NOV 4 91994 ~ °"°~ ~M •y~ iM1M ora~-mt urvi tr-~i xois~ntasne axvxova ,ao ,cria xxvxir~riaxa a ~~ ~ G ! ~~ :- g ~} J ~, ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ o =~ ~ o :~~ ~ g~~~~ ~ ~ ay~~ q ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~I ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~~~a ~ 8 ~ I I ~ar!$ ~ ~ ~a ~ u ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ e=~~ ~~~ . o .Q$ ' ~-. ~ MERIDIAN PLANNING ~ ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: NOVEMBER 9 1894 APPLICANT: PNE/EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 5 REQUEST: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR C N AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: ~ C r L ~~ CITY BUILDING DEPT: TRICT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DIS ~ ~ ~ivl MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: , r ,f~ `~ ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ~~~ ~' ~ '^t S ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: ~ G ~, YY~, CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: ~~ ~ '( "G. NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS iRRIGAtION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: .. ORIGINAL BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PACRARD ANNEXATION AND ZONING A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 SE 1/4, Section 5, T 3N.. R.lE., B.M Ada Coun~L PACRARD SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for consideration on October 11, 1994, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the Planning and Zoning Commission having heard and taken oral and written testimony and the Applicant appearing through Ted Hutchinson, and having duly considered the matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of public hearing on the annexation and zoning was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for October 11, 1994, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the October 11, 1994, hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations. 2. That the property included in the application for annexation and zoning is described in the application, and by this PACKARD ANNEXATION AND ZONING FF & CL Page - 1 reference is incorporated herein; that the property is 39.87 acres in size; the property abuts Kearney and Dove Meadows Subdivisions and is south of Carol Subdivision, which is an Ada County - __ _~i. t. i'1f nA Y__ ~y~`~1.-~-~~'. ~-~~~ '~ _L.7 ~ Sri .~ ~. F.- Subdivision.-^--~ -- 3. That the property is presently zoned by Ada County as (RT) Rural Transition and the proposed use would be for R-4 Residential development with 136 single lots of which 128 would be developed with single family dwellings and eight lots will be common open space; a subdivision plat was submitted for approval which showed a 4.95 acre private neighborhood park; either in the letter submitted with the annexation, zoning and subdivision applications by Ted Hutchinson or by him at the public hearing it was stated the homeowner's association will maintain the landscaped common areas; fences will be installed along the perimeter, a pressurized irrigation system will be developed; that the minimum lot size would be 8,000 square feet with minimum dwelling size of 1,400; that there are several larger lots adjoining Carol Subdivision #2, which are approximately 13,091 square feet; that the ditches will be tiled; that same of the block lengths and cul- de-sacs are longer than allowed by the ordinance and that Applicant desires that the standards be waived; that a temporary lift station for sewer will be necessary but eventually the land would sewer to the South Slough. Mr Hutchinson later testified that the design of the subdivision was driven by the desire for the park space; that the Stokesbury Lateral would be a buffer even if tiled; that the PACKARD ANNEXATION AND ZONING FF & CL Page - 2 rte. ~ property on the north owns the right-of-way for the lateral 4. The general area surrounding the property is used residentially and agriculturally; that the residential property to the south is zoned R-8 as is the residential property to the west; that Carol subdivision is not in the City of Meridian and is an acre or larger lot subdivision. 5. That the property is adjacent and abutting to the present City limits. 6. The Applicant is the owner of record of the property. 7. That the property included in the annexation and zoning application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 8. That the entire parcel of ground is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plana 9. That the Application requests that the parcel be annexed and zoned R-4 Residential; that the present use of the property is for agriculture. 10. That comments were made from the people attending for the hearing; the comments were as follows: a. Don Bryan testified that his irrigation lateral runs along the south boundary of this property; that he has worked with the developer of Dove Meadows and the church property that is south of this property and has had problems with the water. He later testified that the ~~--~~-•-~~~~ was his access to his water headgate _•r-.ems ~ig~~--rte Stdkes~6~/-ry La,~ra.~~ b. Dennis Brockway testified that he was an owner of property in Carol Subdivision; that the proposed buffer lots are not large enough; that he desires a berm with a fence; that a buffer is good compromise. He later testified that he had no problems with reducing the number of lots . PACKARD ANNEXATION AND ZONING FF & CL Page - 3 c. Jon Barnes testified that he had no problem with the density; that there was a problem with the design of the subdivision; that there would be a speed problem along the long street; that there ros used entogh buffer foCarol larger lots that are p p Subdivision; that the buffer lots need to be deepened to act as a buffer. He later testified that the green space could be tied in to make a nice development; that development was not going back to grid system; that he would work with the developer on landscaping the Stokesbury Lateral. d. Douglas Miller testified that there was an invasion of privacy with this development; that he likes the berm idea and want a buffer. e. Dick Packinham testified that there needs to be a 20 foot high berm and fence; that he does not like the project. f. William Ball testified that he wants a 6 foot berm with a fence on top of that. g. Helen Sharp testified that the school district needed help by not developing; that she had a question on the traffic study; that there were problems with water already; that there was a high water table. h. Bert Borup testified that the access was bad; that the time was not right for this subdivision; that he owns property to the north; that this development was premature; that he had problems with using a lift station. He later testified about irrigation and again that the time was not right for this development. i. Vern Alleman testified that he questioned a temporary lift station; he wanted to know what the time limit on a temporary lift station was and he wondered what it did to the trunk line; that he had questions on bonding and whose obligation it was to maintain the lift station; and that bonding should be required. j. Dale Sharp testified that there needs to be a berm and fence that people should be kept out and away from the lateral road. 12. That comments were received from the City Engineer, City Planning Director, Police Department, Fire Department, Meridian School District, Ada County Highway District, Ada County /street PACKARD ANNEXATION AND ZONING FF & CL Page - 4 /'~ .-r Name Committee, Central District Health Department, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, Idaho Power and U. S. West and they are incorporated herein as if set forth in full by this reference. 13. That the City Engineer, Gary Smith, and his Assistant, Bruce Freckleton commented that the high seasonal ground water needs to be determined; that the ditches need to be tiled; coordinate the placement of fire hydrants with the water department; existing domestic wells and septic systems will have to be removed; that restrictive covenants need to b submitted; and other comments. Additionally the Planning Director, Shari Stiles, submitted comment that a variance was required on the length of the cul-de-sac and for block lengths; that perimeter fencing needed to be installed; and, amongst. other comments, stated that the Applicant should receive a Mayoral commendation for offering to provide and develop park space. 14. The Ada County Highway District commented that this project is of sufficient size, and/or is expected to generate traffic impacts such that the District requests deferral of the public hearing until the required traffic study has been approved by the District. 15. The Central District Health Department commented that this an area of high seasonal ground water at about five feet below grade; that they recommend using a storm water management system _ that will not. degrade water quality. 16. That the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District commented that the Stokesberry Lateral crosses along the north boundary of PACKARD ANNEXATION AND ZONING FF & CL Page - 5 the project, that the right-of-way is 40 feet, and that it was recommended that irrigation water be made available to the development. 17. That in the Rural Area section of the Comprehensive Plan, Land Use, Rural Areas, Section 6.3, it does state that land in agricultural activity should so remain in agricultural activity until urban services can be provided. 18. That Meridian has, and is, experiencing a population increase; that there are pressures on land previously used for agricultural uses to be developed into residential subdivision lots. 19. That the property can be physically serviced with City water and sewer. 20. That the R-4, Residential District is described in the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 3 as follows: (R-4) Low Density Residential District: Only Single Family Dwellings shall be permitted and no conditional uses shall be permitted except for Planned Residential Development and public schools. The purpose of the (R-4) District is to permit the establishment of low density single-family dwellings, and to delienate those areas where predominately residential development has, or is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, and to protect the integrity of residential areas by prohibiting the intrusion of incompatible non-residential uses. The (R-4) District allows for a maximum of four ( 4 ) dwelling units per acre and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian; that the R-4 zoning district requires a minimum of 1,400 square feet to be included in detached houses in that zone; that the Applicant is planning detached single family houses and has stated that the R-4 requirements of 1,400 square foot homes and 8,000 PACKARD ANNEXATION AND ZONING FF & CL Page - 6 square foot lots would be met. 21. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Residential Policies, 2.1U states as follows: "Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi-family, town houses, apartments, condominiums, etc. ) for the purpose of providing the City with range of affordable housing opportunities. and states under 2.5U as follows: "Encourage compatible infill development which will improve existing neighborhoods." 22. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Rural Areas, 6.3 c., it states as follows: "Within the Urban Service Planning Area development may occur in densities as low as 3 dwellings per acre if physical connection is made to existing City of Meridian water and sewer service and the property is platted and subdivided . .' 23. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Rural Areas, 6.4, it states as follows: "Residential development is allowed in the rural area provided that said development does not exceed the Rural Residential Agricultural density, unless it is inside the Urban Service Planning Area and City sewer and water is provided, then Low, Medium and High density residential may be considered. All residential development must also comply with the other appropriate sections of this plan." 24. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Housing, Housing Policies, at page 66, it states as follows: "1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile homes, multi-family, town houses arrangements), ." "1.3 An open housing market for all persons, regardless of race, sex, age, religion or ethnic background." "1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping centers should be encouraged." PACKARD ANNEXATION AND ZONING FF & CL Page - 7 n 25. That there is a population influx into the City of Meridian at the present time which has been going on for some time and is likely to continue; that the land is relatively close to Meridian and economic conditions are making it difficult to continue farming in the area. 26. That in prior requests for annexation and zoning in this area the previous Zoning Administrator has commented that annexation could be conditioned on a development agreement including an impact fee to help acquire a future school or park site to serve the area and that annexations should be subject to impact fees for park, police, and fire services as determined by the city and designated in an approved development agreement; that such comment is equally applicable to this Application. 27. That in 1992 the Idaho State Legislature passed amendments to the Local Planning Act, which in 67-6513 Idaho Code, relating to subdivision ordinances, states as follows: "Each such ordinance may provide for mitigation of the effects of subdivision development on the ability of political subdivisions of the state, including school districts, to deliver services without compromising quality of service delivery to current residents or imposing substantial additional costs upon current residents to accommodate the subdivision."; that the City of Meridian is concerned with the increase in population that is occurring and with its impact on the City being able to provide fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services to its current residents and to those moving into the City; the City is also concerned that the increase in population is burdening the schools of the Meridian School PACKARD ANNEXATION AND ZONING FF & CL Page - 8 ~ i"~ District which provide school service to current and future residents of the City; that the City knows that the increase in population does not sufficiently increase the tax base to offset the cost of providing fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services; and the City knows that the increase in population does not provide sufficient tax base to provide for school services to current and future students. 28. That pursuant to the instruction, guidance, and direction of the Idaho State Legislature, the City may impose either a development fee or a transfer fee on residential property, which, if possible, would be retroactive and apply to all residential lots in the City because of the imperilment to the health, welfare, and safety of the citizens of the City of Meridian. 29. That Section 11-9-605 C states as follows: "Right-of-way for pedestrian walkways in the middle of long blocks may be required where necessary to obtain convenient pedestrian circulation to schools, parks or shopping areas; the pedestrian easement shall be at least ten feet (10') wide." 30. That Section 11-9-605 G 1. states as follows: "Planting strips shall be required to be placed next to incompatible features such as highways, railroads, commercial or industrial uses to screen the view from residential properties. Such screening shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') wide, and shall not be a part of the normal street right of way or utility easement." 31. That Section 11-9-605 H 2. states as follows: "Existing natural features which add value to residential development and enhance the attractiveness of the community (such as trees, watercourses, historic spots and similar irreplaceable amenities) shall be preserved in the design of the subdivision;" PACKARD ANNEXATION AND ZONING FF & CL Page - 9 r 32. That Section 11-9-605 R states as follows: "The extent and location of lands designed for linear open space corridors should be determined by natural features and, to lesser extent, by man-made features such as utility easements, transportation rights of way or water rights of way. Landscaping, screening or lineal open space corridors may be required for the protection of residential properties from adjacent arterial streets, waterways, railroad rights of way or other features. As improved areas (landscaped), semi- improved areas (a landscaped pathway only), or unimproved areas (left in a natural state), linear open space corridors serve: 1. To preserve openness; 2. To interconnect park and open space systems within rights of way for trails, walkways, bicycle ways; 3. To play a major role in conserving area scenic and natural value, especially waterways, drainages and natural habitat; 4. To buffer more intensive adjacent urban land uses; 5. To enhance local identification within the area due to the internal linkages; and 6. To link residential neighborhoods, park areas and recreation facilities." 33. That Section 11-9-605 L states as follows: Bicycle and pedestrian pathways shall be encouraged within new developments as part of the public right of way or as separate easements so that an alternate transportation system (which is distinct and separate from the automobile) can be provided throughout the City Urban Service Planning Area. The Commission and Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the Bicycle Pedestrian Design Manual for Ada County (as prepared by Ada County Highway District) when reviewing bicycle and pedestrian pathway provisions within developments. 34. That proper notice was given as required by law and all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission were given and followed. PACKARD ANNEXATION AND ZONING FF & CL Page - 10 n .-. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met, including the mailing of notice to owners of property within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. 2. That the City of Meridian has authority to annex land pursuant to 50-222, Idaho Code, and Section 11-2-417 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that exercise of the City's annexation authority is a Legislative function. 3. That the Planning and Zoning Commission has judged this annexation and zoning application under Section 50-222, Idaho Code, Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Meridian City Ordinances, the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the record submitted to it and things of which it can take judicial notice. 4. That all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been complied with. 5. That the Commission may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and State. 6. That the land within the annexation is contiguous to the present City limits of the City of Meridian, and the annexation would not be a shoestring annexation. 7. That the annexation application has been initiated by the Applicant, which is the titled owner, and the annexation is not PACKARD ANNEXATION AND ZONING FF & CL Page - 11 n .-~ upon the initiation of the City of Meridian. 8. That since the annexation and zoning of land is a legislative function, the City has authority to place conditions upon the annexation of land. Burt vs. The City of Idaho Falls. 105 Idaho 65, 665 P.D 1075 (1983). 9. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, Section 11-9-605 M., which pertains to the tiling of ditches and water ways, and Section 11-9-606 B 14, which pertains to pressurized irrigation; that the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer; that the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance; that, as a condition of annexation the Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address the inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, K, L, 11-9-606 B. 14., pressurized irrigation; that the development agreement shall, as a condition of annexation, require that the Applicant, or if required, any assigns, heirs, executors or personal representatives, pay, when required, any development fee or transfer fee adopted by the City; that there shall be no annexation until the requirements of this paragraph are met or, if necessary, the property shall be subject to de-annexation and loss of City services, if the requirements of this paragraph are not met. PACKARD ANNEXATION AND ZONING FF & CL Page - 12 10. That the Applicant's property is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, and therefore the annexation and zoning Application would be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. 11. That the requirements of the Meridian City Engineer, and of the Ada County Highway District, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, Meridian Fire and Police Departments, and the comments of the Meridian Planning Director, shall be met and addressed in a development Agreement. 12. That all ditches, canals, and waterways shall be tiled, if annexed, as a condition of annexation and if not so tiled the property shall be subject to de-annexation; that the Applicant shall be required to install a pressurized irrigation system, and if not so done the property shall be subject to de-annexation. 13. That the development of R-4 as suggested by the Applicant is not compatible to the homes in Carol Subdivision; that R-4 development would be compatible with the lots and homes in Kearney Subdivision, Dove Meadows, and the other R-8 subdivisions in the area; that some type of transition development between Carol Subdivision and the lots along Wingate Lane, and this property's proposed northern lots, needs to be put forth for the development of the property. 14. That if the Applicant does not request that transition zoning be applied to the land and submit a plat application showing this, it is concluded that the property should not be annexed; that it is of great concern to the Commission that the lots along Carol Subdivision and Wingate Lane are protected; that the matter should PACKARD ANNEXATION AND ZONING FF & CL Page - 13 be tabled until a new subdivision application is submitted; that as a condition of annexation, if ultimately annexed, it is concluded that more distance, berming and/or screening should be placed between the two subdivisions and this proposed subdivision and the lots fronting Wingate Lane which may abut this land. 15. That it is further concluded that the access for Don Bryan, or any other water user, to his headgates or water shall not be impeded. 16. That all ditches, canals, and waterways required to be tiled by City Ordinance shall be tiled as a condition of annexation, when annexed, and if not so tiled the property shall be subject to de-annexation. 17. With compliance of the conditions contained herein, the annexation and eventual new plat to meet the transition between acre or more lots and R-4 would be in the best interest of the City of Meridian. 18. Therefore, based on the Application, the testimony and evidence, the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian, it is ultimately concluded that Applicant's application for annexation and zoning should be tabled until a new plat is submitted which addresses transition zoning; that any new subdivision plat must be compatible with Carol Subdivision and the lots along Wingate Lane. The zoning should gradually go from the acre lots of Carol Subdivision to the R-4 lots in the southern and western ends of this subdivision; that the conditions would be those stated above if the property is PACKARD ANNEXATION AND ZONING FF & CL Page - 14 /'~ eventually annexed and zoned; that the annexation and development then would be more of an orderly and reasonable development; that the property shall be subject to de-annexation if the requirements of these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are not met. 19. That proper and adequate access to the property is of concern to the Commission and should be addressed in the new plat. 20. With compliance of the conditions contained herein, the annexation and eventual new plat to meet the transition between acre or more lots and the R-4 lots, would be in the best interest of the City of Meridian, but it should be tabled to allow the Applicant time to submit another plat. 21. That if these conditions of approval are not met the property should not annexed. 22. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind the applicant and its assigns. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian Planning and :Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONER HEPPER COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE COMMISSIONER SHEARER COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) PACKARD ANNEXATION AND ZONING FF & CL .~ VOTED VOTED VOTED VOTED VOTED Page - 15 RECO1~IIdENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends that the Application for annexation and zoning be tabled; if the Applicant shall not meet these conditions, the Application shall be denied. MOTION: APPROVED:/ DISAPPROVED: PACKARD ANNEXATION AND ZONING FF & CL Page - 16 ~ ~`1 Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 20 extension of spruce tree to the south boundary. In their planning there is no need for an additional railroad crossing at that point. And we also discussed the existing private street which lies to the east of this property and ACRD had some recommendations on how that intersection could be reconfigured to make it a better situation and we will comply with the highway district requirements, I would be glad to answer any questions. Johnson: Any questions of Mr. Lee? Rountree: What is the setback from centerline of Locust Grove Road, for right of way? It doesn't show it. Lee: It is currently, the right of way is situated 50 feet on adjoining properties. ACRD has requested an additional 10 feet from what is shown on the preliminary plat, so the right of way there will be 60 feet total width. The reason for that is they have some long range plans to realign Locust Grove to the West and install a new railroad crossing and eventually this particular crossing will be abandoned so they saw no need to have any wider right of way through there. Johnson: Any further questions? This is a public hearing, anyone from the public that would like to address the Commission? Seeing no one then I will close the public hearing. This is a preliminary plat. Hepper: Mr. Chairman, I move that we recommend approval of the preliminary plat. Shearer: Second Johnson: It has been moved and seconded that we recommend approval of the preliminary plat, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #10: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PACKARD SUBDIVISION BY PNE/EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION: Johnson: Is a representative for the applicant, would you please come forward and address the Commission at this time. Ted Hutchinson, 109 South Fort Street, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Hutchinson: Thank you Mr. Chairman and members of the Commission. This is an '~ r Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 21 those will be common open space lots or landscape areas. The site is located north of the Capital Christian Center which is on Fairview Avenue also north of Dove Meadows Subdivision. We are west of the Kearney Subdivision and south of Carol Subdivision, we are approximately 1/4 mile in from Eagle Road and 1/4 mile north of Fairview Avenue. The site is not presently located in the city limits therefore the annexation request, the city limits does abut the southem and western sites of this particular site. We are asking for an R-4 zoning designation for this site which is a low density residential district. The Meridian Comprehensive Plan has identified this site as a mixed use or planned development area for approximately half of it. That would be the southem half, with the north half designated residential development. We are proposing simply to develop this entire parcel with single family development. Lots within the development will meet or exceed the zoning ordinance standard for R-4 development and we are including a 4.95 acres of common open space which is principally about 4 and 3/4 acres of park land which is interconnected with some open space. On the east and west ends as well as interconnecting for ease of access into the park area for the lots of the development. The area surrounding this site contains a mix of uses, however primarily it is residential use that is in transition from agricultural use. The Capital Christian Center as I have indicated is south of this site and Dove Meadows Subdivision, Wingate Place, Kearney Subdivision and Carol's Subdivision also adjacent to those site. Most of these have developed at R-8 or R-4 residential development standards. The agricultural land remains as relatively large parcels, we are proposing that a homeowners association will maintain the common areas between this development. The park is designed for the ready access of the residents of development, we are proposing fences along the perimeter which will provide a buffer from the adjoining land uses. We will also use a pressurized irrigation system as required by the zoning ordinance. The lots in Carol subdivision which is to the north, this area up here, these are acre lots and as we laid this out we tried to take into consideration those larger lots. So we have got several, these are little over 13,000 square foot lots, there are 4 of them which lie adjacent to Carol subdivision. We tried to place those so that the residences that are on those lots will be adjacent to larger lots. As I stated about or little over 13,000 square feet so that there is some transition for the smaller urban sized lots to what are called estate lots in the county. There is also a ditch along in here, it is our understanding that will need to be covered or fenced which provides additional buffering between the uses their. We have tried to comply with all of the provisions of the zoning ordinance especially the design and dimensional standards for the R-4 zone. The minimum lot size in this development is 8,000 square feet, the minimum dwelling size excluding the garage will be 1400 square feet. Streets are designed for interconnection with adjacent land without providing a high speed pass through traffic routes. As we laid this out we had several conversations with the Ada County Highway District. Their chief concern was the location for stub streets, this stub street is located in this position based on a highway district requirement, they wanted that north of the center of the parcel. This is a large, agricultural parcel with a great deal of frontage along Eagle Road as it extends clear to the corner at '~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 22 location for stub streets, this stub street is located in this position based on a highway district requirement, they wanted that north of the center of the parcel. This is a large, agricultural parcel with a great deal of frontage along Eagle Road as it extends clear to the corner at Eagle and Fairview. So we are going to be providing the stub street to that parcel in the event that it will develop probably at a more intense use than the residential that we are proposing. Again we didn't want any the ability for any traffic to use this a high speed cut through for when this develops or to get out to Fairview avenue or to the north, they have to make several turns before they can pass through this development. The streets will be built to Ada County Highway District standards, one of the comments in your packet is that the Highway District has requested that this be tabled pending a traffic study. That traffic study is under way, our traffic engineer has indicated he is very close to completing that particular study and the results should be available before this goes to the City Council. Due to the lack of intersecting streets from the exterior of this site some of the blocks particularly the block along the South and along the east and again along the north are longer than those recommended by the zoning ordinance. We have in order to provide continuity to the pathway system in the park, this culdesac is also a little bit longer than that is recommended by the zoning ordinance. Due to the constraints that are based in the parcel, based on the exterior of the parcel and our attempt to provide some functional open space within this development we would ask that the commission waive the maximum block length standard and the culdesac provision for this particular development. Our proposal is offering the unique feature which is a very large park space, the park is to be used for the enjoyment of the residents of the development. The park is accessible from all parts of the subdivision. This will be a quality development that will enhance the area. The Packard Subdivision includes several larger lots adjoining Carol subdivision to provide a buffer against those larger lots. In summary we are seeking approval of the annexation and zoning of this 39 acre parcel with a concurrent zone of R-4 and approval of the preliminary plat for Packard Subdivision. There 136 lots, however 128 of those would be for residential development. Due to the location of the sewer system that exists now, we will have to work out the provision of a temporary lift station to sewer this particular project. that would connect back out into the I believe into Dove Meadows Development. However we are as you are aware from the earlier application with the Brown property and the ability to sewer that along the north slough as this area develops there will be the ability to eventually connect this development with the north slough sewer thus eliminating the need for a lift station and we are hoping that all of that will fall into place in a good order. Keeping the necessity of a lift station at a very temporary basis. We have reviewed the comments from the City Engineer and from your Planning staff. We believe that we can comply with all of those requirements. We have what we believe to be a quality project here and offering some much needed open space. I believe this would exceed the Comprehensive Plan recommendation for park space given the size of the park and the size of development. We therefore ask that you recommend approval of this application to City Council. Are there any questions from the Commission? ~ /'~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 23 Johnson: Any questions of Mr. Hutchinson? Rountree: What was the projected time line on the traffic study completion? Hutchinson: Mr. Chairman, Commissioner Rountree, I believe it should be less than 2 weeks to its completion. Rountree: And that would be both submitted to ACRD and the City? Hutchinson: Yes it will. Rountree: With just one access existing essentially today, how many lots would you be able to develop in any one phase? Hutchinson: Mr. Chairman, Commissioner Rountree as before I believe 40 lots would be the maximum allowed by the Highway District in any one phase if you have one way in and one way out. 1 believe this is now interconnected through to Locust Grove as well as we will complete the connection from here down to Fairview Avenue. This will be phased, we are hoping to have it phased. I believe we are looking at a phasing of an east side and a west side with the west side developing first through the provision of the sewer requirements. Hepper: You have some bigger lots there on the north end there adjacent to the 1 acre lots in the adjacent subdivision there, the minimum house size is 1400 square feet, in past experiences we had subdivisions backing up to bigger subdivisions they put the adjacent houses at a little bit bigger footage, would you be willing to maybe increase the footage on those 4 lots those 4 estate sized lots to maybe 1500 square feet? Hutchinson: Mr. Chairman, Commissioner Hepper, 1 would have to speak to the developer on that. Hepper: I would think that the economics would suggest that the price of the lots and the size of them that the house would automatically be bigger than that anyway. Just so those property owners that back up to that property line would have some assurance that they would have. Hutchinson: It makes sense, again I would have to clear that with the developer. Johnson: I have one question I am dying to ask of the developer, there is a rather exhaustive letter in the, as there is on most of our applications from the Joint School District No. 2 which is the Meridian School District regarding the difficulty they are having ~ n Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 24 with schools and crowding and the fact that this particular subdivision would feed schools that are already at their maximum or over their maximum capacity. Do you have any comments regarding that letter from the school district? Hutchinson: Mr. Chairman, I have just seen this letter today, it is one that again we are acutely sensitive to the overcrowding that is in the Meridian School District at this time. I think most of the developers are willing to work with the school district in an attempt to come to some sort of a solution or some way to aid the school district in that dilemma. I don't know how to address it at this particular time. Again, I believe the developer will need to look at this to see if there is something that they can't , to see if there is someway to work with the school district to help them out. Johnson: Thank you, anyone else? This is a public hearing, is there someone else that would like to address the Commission on this issue? Dennis Brockway, 1059 Justin, was sworn by the City Attorney. Brockway: We have some of the adjacent Carol Subdivision neighbors here tonight and I am going to speak to one item that I think is very important. I want to say this right the first time, the gentleman that proceeded me here was making quite a case for these extremely large lots that will buffer our acre and a half and acre lots. I don't seem them as extremely large, I think 20 feet of the northern boundary of this proposed subdivision should be common area with a berm and a fence. And I am talking maybe a berm 6 feet high in the middle and a 4 foot fence on top of that. Heavily landscaped, because can you imagine, I don't want to have to be either of the 2 most impacted lots, maybe that is why I am up here speaking. Can you imagine on some of those northern lots 2 story homes looking down onto those homes that are used to having a lot of space around them. Normally, a good planner will want to buffer an acre and a half lot with maybe a 3/4 or 1 /2 acre lot and I think that this berm is a very good compromise where you don't have the buffering. Now I have others here that will perhaps raise their hands or do you want them to come up here individually. Johnson: We will just call each one individually that wants to come up here. Brockway: I am done, thank you very much gentlemen. Jon Barnes, 1034 Justin Place, was sworn by the City Attorney. Barnes: As all of you know 1 am in the development business, I guess it is more fun sometimes to come and grade somebody elses report cards and I guess we can get a little more critical of someone else's than our own. There are a couple of things, I want to talk ~"~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 25 of developments you approve. Specifically on this Packard Subdivision there are some things that I think are good about it, the density 1 don't' think is any problem, it is just over 3 lots to the acre. But the overall design, to me, and I think I would just like to, you guys should really take a good look at the design of this, it is very much an 1870's what I would call a drafting 101 type approach, a grid, perpendicular streets, north and south east and west. I think that the lasting beauty and integrity of a community needs to be a lot in a design and when you think about design and talk about curve or linear streets that flow that have, if you look at this Subdivision like Packard Avenue, the streets that goes up and down on the east side of the development it is nearly a 1/4 mile long. It is a completely straight street, having been in this business a lot of years all of those houses would be set, the garages vwuld be set back at 20 feet and you would have just a straight line of houses kind of government housing feel. You will also, Ted here said there wouldn't be a speed problem, when you have that much of a straight away down through there you do have a speed problem and again they are selling homes here that would probably be $130,000 - $140,000 homes with children and stuff and safety is definitely a concern. I would just like to encourage you to be more critical of us developers on the design of what you take a look at here. I know that you get overwhelmed with a lot of applications, you get a lot of pressure, but you are building something that is going to be here for 30, 40, 50 years or longer and future generations are going to have to live with what you approve and go through. Specifically I live in the house directly north here with the pool (End of Tape) if you look at the depth of those lots that is my biggest concern and I have sold an .awful lot of lots in this town and knowing the setbacks and the size of houses and I appreciate Mr. Commissioner Heppers concern of 1500 square foot minimum but my biggest concern is the depth. If you look at those there that are like 103 deep off that northern street which is called Catlin Drive, when you take the setbacks in a larger house like that starting with a 20 foot setback and then you put your 15 foot setback on the rear a larger home will be pressing right against, it will be right on that 15 foot rear yard setback. And that is really our concern to have 2 storys that sometimes go 30 feet in the air at a 15 foot point from the northern boundary of the subdivision. It would be very oppressive and really overbearing. 1 would like to either have some kind of a buffer, I would suggest that you either cut some out of the 4 1/2 acres of park and 1 do commend them for that, that is a really nice park, it is a big park something the city needs. I know you know that too, but some kind of a buffer or rotate those lots, they are 127 feet wide, 128 feet wide rotate them the other way and give us the depth north and south and the width at 100 so that, people like to live at the rear yard. And then those houses are further from the rear yard and aren't as oppressive to us because those 2 houses in Carol Subdivision at the south end, (inaudible) are fairly close to this property. But other than that I don't have any other comments, but 1 would encourage you to really consider someway of deepening those lots or putting some kind of a good buffer along that north boundary. Thank you. Johnson: Any questions of Mr. Barnes? ~ n Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 26 Johnson: Any questions of Mr. Barnes? Douglas Miller, 1035 Justin Place, was sworn by the City Attorney. Miller: I live just west of Mr. Barnes, so we are living directly adjacent to the subdivision. If you count these lots that are adjacent to us that it is not only 3 but 4 lots would be adjacent portions to our lots. I think this acre subdivision has been inhabited by few people who at great forethought and great expense have carved out some privacy, some open space and I see these homes crowded densely on the south boundary as very much an invasion of that privacy and very much a degradation of the original concept that was designed for these 1 acre subdivisions. I very much agree with the sentiment of increasing that setback, I think the berm idea is an excellent idea to provide the privacy for us as well as privacy to those neighboring lots on the south there. That I think is our major concern of this subdivision as it is outlined. I think the berm with a considerable buffer along that boundary would be appropriate. Johnson: Thank you Mr. Miller. Dick R.W. Peckenschneider, 1131 Justin Place, was sworn by the City Attorney. Peckenschneider: I wanted to reiterate basically what they are saying because there are several of us that are homeowners there and we didn't buy those houses to have a bunch of mickey mouse little lots built to the south of us. The buffer zone, Dan told me that we needed a berm and I agree with that but I think he is a little short, I think it ought to be 20 feet high. I would probably put concertina wire on the top of it but the only way you are going to block this off, now Miller's and Barnes those are the ones that are going to be hurt, I am not going to be hurting near as bad because I am 4 houses on down. But it is still messing me up because if those kids and if you are going to have 128 houses, the way I figure it the way they breed you are going to have about 2 kids per house and a dog and I don't know how many cats are all going to be streaming over into our area which we have tried to subdue to a point and that is why we bought out there. We didn't by acre lots out there and buy expensive homes to have, I got 10,000 feet of grass and that isn't even part of my lot for crying out loud, I just don't understand this. I think we need a big buffer, I don't know how deep it is going to have to be for Millers and Barnes but it has to be far enough back that you can build a berm and I say a fence too. So it isn't going to be something kids are going to be playing in and getting hurt on. We don't need this, I personally don't want it, I don't know where all these kids are going to go to school, in fact I don't even know where they are getting to get the jobs, 128 houses. One place to get out and there is not even a stop sign that comes out of that place right now, you get down to Fairview, I have been about run over several times, if wasn't a wild man I would have been hit. But you are sitting there with one stinking road that comes into Fairview and you are ^ /'~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 27 going to put another 128 houses with the rest of all of those houses that are up there. It is unbelievable, it is ludicrous and where are these kids going to go to school? I don't want them crossing over into Barnes and the Millers and then pretty soon they infiltrate Johnsons yard and then(inaudible) and then mine. I don't want, I don't like it, I think it sucks. Johnson: It is a neighborhood with character. William Ball, 1058 Justin Place, was sworn by the City Attorney. Ball: Well, I can't quite follow that act, but t think everyone has pretty much covered the situation that we are faced there with on Justin Place. I just want to add my piece that we are in support of the berm, the original by Dennis I think is a good one with the 6 feet and the additional fence on top of that. John made some original points about the development of the project and again I would just like to firm that I support the objection and the berm. Thank you. Johnson: Thanks Mr. Ball. Anyone else? Helen Sharp, 2445 Wingate Lane, was sworn by the City Attorney. Sharp: Going along with our gentlemen here, he says he has 1 acre that he has been trying to protect without the invasions, we have 5 acres and they are right up against our fence thanks to all the granting of the zone changing. And when (inaudible) he says he would like to help the school districts the best way to help them is to squelch the subdivision, 128 new houses. I think if anybody would check with he realtors they will find that there is approximately between 500 and 600 houses available in the Meridian district right now. That does not include all the houses that are being built and already have been granted the zone changes so that they can be built. We have also been told repeatedly because I have been to numerous meetings here with all of the subdivisions about the road study for Locust Grove, did I understand the gentleman to say they may go onto Locust Grove as an access for the subdivision, in that case I would like to see one of the reports that we are supposed to be getting on the Locust Grove Road traffic because those of us that live there in the immediate area know what Locust Grove Road is right now and what is going to be like. Especially if we get the others granted at the end of Locust Grove, so Locust Grove is greatly picked on. I would like to know where I could get a copy of this report if it has actually been done. I have heard developers say that there is being one done. Where do I go to get this report? Johnson: When the traffic study comes in and it is submitted to the city, I understand it goes to you Gary is that correct? Gary gets a copy of it, our City Engineer. Once done '^ /"~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 28 is it available to the public? (Discussion Inaudible) Johnson: It is public information once it comes in. So once we receive it is public information which means you can have a copy at $50.00 a copy or something like that. Sharp: If it is like the Comprehensive Plan it will be obsolete before it is printed. Johnson: Like everything else. Sharp: I would also like to reiterate like I said before that we also have problems with water in that area and I don't know if they have that immediately in this 39 acres. Wingate Lane of course is just you might say abutting that property and there is a high water table. We know, we have dug down there is the hard pan and water does not seep through. We have also been told to use surface water and we know that there are problems from the drainage with that. But I would like to say again to use a little bit of foresight and not so much hindsight. Our schools are suffering, 1 saw an article in the paper about our volunteer fire department, it is going too fast and there is not a real reasonable. There is no demand for housing right now in Meridian (inaudible) but there are all these properties available, the realtors would probably like to say let's sell what we have got. Let's use a little bit of foresight. Johnson: Thank you. Burt Borrup, 2640 Wingate Lane, was sworn by the City Attorney. Borup: What I see here is kind of the cart before the horse thing. There are so many things that need to be addressed in this subdivision. This is the heart of the mile section and access is terrible to it, I think fire protection would be poor even when it is fully developed. As Helen pointed out we have a lot of subdivisions, I can stand in my front yard and probably see 5 that are just slightly developed as we speak. So I really don't' think that the time is right necessarily for this subdivision. I think there are a lot of things that have to transpire to make this plan work as it is on this map. I have the property directly north of it, for instance one of the things if they do decide to have a berm and I ,can understand why you do want a berm I have to irrigate from the ditch that runs down there. And I think covering the ditch is a good safety thing, is it going to prohibit people from getting up and down that lane to take care of their irrigation needs that still use this as farm property. That is something that will have to be taken care of. I know in the past that certain subdivisions have gone in and created all kinds of havoc with people who still want to have flood type irrigation. And I know one in particular that has been addressed to this Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 29 board probably half a dozen times and is still not taken care of. So, that is just one of many things, it is not the fact that I am totally against growth it is just proper growth and I see the timing of this particular subdivision as just being really premature. If the roads were to develop around it let's get the sewer a little farther a little closer to it. Possibly in the next 2 to 3 years I don't know how the legislature is going to handle another school but maybe a little more schooling. Certain things to where when this finally does go and it is not such a great impact sewer wise anything wise 1 think we have enough subdivisions presently in progress. I think we are going to go into a slowing situation through the winter. I am sure they are looking at this optimistically from a development standpoint, but I think it would fill up slowly. I am not necessarily in favor of, I know they said temporary lift station, but temporary is going to be dictated by development and consequently by allowing this lift station it not only sets a precedent of other lift stations in the future. Having talked to Don Johnson at the City of Boise a lift station of this magnitude is going to be $100,000 to $150,000 and if it is turned over to the city of Meridian there is possibly a $5,000 annual fee to maintain this station. If they waited and did hook up to the trunk line when it progresses that would be an expense that the taxpayer would not have to withstand. I just see a lot of things here that aren't necessarily as wrong as early. I think if they waited they would have less objection, I think they would have a cleaner development and it would fit in the community at a more timely fashion. Johnson: Thank you Mr. Borup, is there anyone else? Vern Alleman, 2101 East Ustick, was sworn by the City Attorney. Alleman: I guess I have some questions and it primarily pertains to the lift station which is temporary. What I was wondering is if this is temporary what is the time limit for it to become permanent. What are the provisions for enforcing it if it has a time limit. What does it do for the development of the trunk line which is to be developed along the south slough, I think now is called another name. Is there any provision for, if it is temporary we say then in the future it is going to contribute to the trunk line. When can this be taken here, what if they say your time is this time and ours is another time? Johnson: 1 will ask our City Engineer to comment on lift stations and the temporary status. Did you have any other questions before we do that? Alleman: What is the provisions is there bonding that is required for something along this line? And also in operation of the lift station is that the City's obligation or who does the repair and the operation of the lift station. I guess I am concerned that they, this could be delayed or more or less on a permanent basis. Johnson: I think it is probably appropriate at this point to have Gary talk to us a little bit ~ /'~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 30 about these temporary lift stations. We have a couple on line now if you would like to fill us in briefly Gary. Smith: Mr. Chairman, Commission members, Vern, the word temporary means that at some point in the future the lift station could be abandoned and it is only temporary to that extent. In my mind the word temporary does not carry a specific time limit with it. It would all be dependent on the rate at which the property to the north of this piece would develop and the south slough or the finch lateral trunk line would be extended to the east. Ultimately that south slough or finch lateral trunk line will extend and serve all of the property to the east to our east impact boundary line which is a 1/4 west of Cloverdale Road. That is the significance of the south slough or Finch lateral interceptor. The policy of the City Council of the City of Meridian in the past has been development as it develops extends the sewer and the water services to and through their properties. In this particular case the sewer exists this time at Locust Grove Road which is a 1/2 mile to the west. There are 2 parcels of ground that have been proposed in the City of Meridian for development that would require the extension of the south slough of the finch lateral interceptor. One would be the Chamberlain Estates Subdivision the other one would be, I think it is referred to as PNE/Edmonds annexation. It has not been submitted for preliminary plat as far as I know but it has been submitted for, it is the existing Brown property, I believe it is referred to. So the development of both of those parcels and the extension of that sewer trunk line would also cross your property as you and 1 have discussed several times. The development of those parcels of ground would get the interceptor to Wingate Lane. Then it would be a matter of extending a line in Wingate Lane to the south to pick up this lift station and at that time this lift station would not be active any longer it would be abandoned. The requirements if this subdivision is approved by the Council the improvements for the Subdivision including the lift station would be at the expense of the developer. The maintenance of the. lift station would be carried on by the City of Meridian. Obviously as I have expressed to everybody that I have talked to in the past we are not in favor of lift stations because they are a high maintenance item. It is a daily maintenance routine, 365 days a year. And it is an expense, I guess it is something the City Council needs to weigh against this development and the features of this development. Have I answered your questions? Alleman: I guess then would be my concern would be in as much as they would be contributing to the trunk line I am wondering if they would be delaying some development rather than to contribute to the trunk line. I think possibly that in order for this to be on a temporary basis that there should be some bonding, so if they say I am not going to do what are we going to do about it. I think perhaps a solution might be that they would provide a bonding to see that it was done whenever it was needed, other wise you are going to be in a no catch situation because you are not going to be able to do the trunk line. I hope I am not looking at this from a selfish individual standpoint or from the ~ /'\ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 31 standpoint of trying to curtail their development. Johnson: Thank you Vern, is there anyone else that would like to come forward at this time? Don Bryan, 2070 North Locust Grove Road, was sworn by the City Attorney. Bryan: All I had to look at was this little plat plan, just like afl the rest of the subdivisions around the area. My irrigation lateral runs down the south border of this property. I have 4 developers at the intersection of that property where the roads are ending and the ditches are coming together and the lots are backing up to. I would like to ask the developer what he had in mind for that section of ground right there and what he is going to do in the future and when. And also in conjunction with Dove Meadows development as to if he has worked with the Dove Meadows developer and talked to him about the problems we are having out there and what he found doing in the future as far as lining that ditch and providing the head gate access and working with the church property. And while I am here and have your undivided attention, I was wondering when this portion of Dove Meadows was ever approved which is on the church property? I have come to all of the meetings and I have never seen this portion of Dove Meadows every being approved. I have gotten a plat just like this and of course I have probably never seen a plat. I have gotten little pieces like this. We have a problem at that intersection and I wold like to see this addressed before this development gets under way. Because they don't even know where the streets are going yet according to the people I talked to in the developments. They have ideas and they want to do this map but I have nothing in writing. That is all I have. Johnson: Thanks Don, is there anyone else? Well, 1 don't see anyone, thank you for your testimony I appreciate that. I will close the public hearing, what would like the next step to be. I should really ask before I do that whether the developer had anything he wanted to add to the comments that were made and I can re-open the hearing if you would like to do that? I think I will re-open it and ask you a question. I will now re-open the hearing. Mr. Barnes was testifying with respect to, I don't think he was particularly impressed with your design. And in all seriousness his comments with respect to depth of lots on that long street, that might encourage speeding and that kind of thing. And it doesn't look like a plan that has a whole lot of imagination to it without being more critical than that. Do you feel a re-design of the plat there would be possible? And still be able to accomplish what you want to accomplish and maybe take into consideration some of the comments and objections you heard this evening? Hutchinson: Mr. Chairman, what you have is I guess the new terminology for it is new- traditional design. It is laid out on a grid system, the grid system is probably the most Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 32 efficient use of the ground. In order to accomplish the provision of this very large open space the design had to follow the neo-traditional street layout. I think more and more subdivisions are going to be going back to this particular design movements away from some of the typical subdivisions that have been designed through the 80's which have not promoted interconnection of traffic systems. But again this particular design was driven by the desire to provide that very large open space. If we redesign I don't know that we could get the curvilinear streets and some of the other things in there and still maintain that size of a park space. It is just not as an efficient use of the land as what we (inaudible). Johnson: Any questions of Mr. Hutchinson while we have here from the Commission. Rountree: Do you see it possible utilizing that open space that you propose though a reconfiguration as being if not part a total buffer to the properties to the north? Hutchinson: As I have indicated when I made my previous presentation the idea was to provide the larger lots so that there are fewer houses that would be adjoining those. not only are they subject to your 15 foot rear yard setback but the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District in their comments have indicated that the Stokesbury Lateral in there also has a 40 foot right of way. Which provides further buffering and that puts the nearest house to the northern lot line of this development at 85 feet and in that 85 feet you will find 40 feet that is in that right of way and an additional 15 feet that is on our property which is the minimum rear yard setback. I believe that fencing would provide an adequate buffering. Hepper: There is a lateral that runs between the 2 properties? Hutchinson: Yes, the Stokesbury Lateral, in fact I believe there are 2 laterals that run in there, one has already been covered. There is an open one that currently runs back there. Hepper: Is that an (inaudible) irrigation ditch or drain ditch? Hutchinson: I would imagine irrigation where it is managed by the irrigation district. Hepper: It has an access road for the irrigation district is that correct? Hutchinson: They maintain a 40 foot, they have claim to a 40 foot right of way 20 feet on center on the lateral. (Discussion Inaudible) Hutchinson: They would still maintain that 40 foot right of way. ~ ~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 33 Hepper: The property line would be somewhere in between those 2 even though there is an easement there. Hutchinson: The property line is located outside the easement. Hepper: Do the property owners on the other side of the ditch actually own that area? Hutchinson: I believe the irrigation district claims a right of way so I believe they are claiming (inaudible). Hepper: (Inaudible) own the property. What I am trying to figure out is who actually owns the property, you guys or the property owners. Hutchinson: I believe the property owner on the north would own it. Hepper: So if it is not on your property we should be tiling that ditch? Hutchinson: I believe the Meridian zoning ordinance requires that we the all those that are adjacent to the property. Hepper: 1 am not sure how the fine points of that read as far as (inaudible). Johnson: Any further questions? Well, it is still open, anyone from the public one last time. Barnes: I am the one that brought up the idea of redesign but I really feel strongly that they could take that 41/2 acre park and utilize that green space with a redesign. Let's say they brought that main street in as it comes in as you seen down in the southwest corner and went across that. You know flowing with gentle curves and looped off that and tie that green space in and you could really make a much nicer neighborhood for the City. I just think that this typical grid approach. I don't agree with what he said, that isn't I don't see developers going back to that, I see them going away from it because the buyers, it provides more community, better aesthetics. More or a variety instead of just looking right down the front of garages right straight down a street. Get away from the stereotypes of a lot of the old developments. I really would encourage you to consider asking them to come in with another concept that would serve this City and this community better. Thank you. Hepper: That ditch there that has an easement, if that is tiled that would be an additional 40 feet that would be kind of a no mans land, it is your actual property but there is an easement there. ~ ~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 34 Barnes: It isn't, the road from the edge of the ditch directly, the Stokesbury Lateral, directly south of my place and Millers, there is a roadway of maybe a little more than 10 feet to our property line from the edge of what is now the Stokesbury Lateral. The problem is whether, I have dealt with them on down stream of the Stokesbury lateral with Nampa Meridian Irrigation District and we have put that Stokesbury in pipe, 24 inch pipe but they still retain the easement and won't allow us to do anything to that. Our concern is just like what was expressed earlier is that we have expensive nice homes, we worked hard to make it be in a private area, we feel that we need more than just an open area between. We would like to see some kind of a berm some kind of way to push back noise. The height of these bigger homes, because when you have a 100 foot lot on this big of house it is going to be right back at that 15 foot setback. Hepper: Do you think there would possibly be some way that something could be worked out between you and the developer to maybe have them landscape that 40 foot easement area once that ditch is tiled? Games: We would be glad to sit down with them, I know the developer, I used to sell him lots years ago. Hepper: (Inaudible) that there is an easement in there that Barnes: Would really be at Nampa Meridians, they still call the shots on that easement. They have the easement, we own the land but they have the easement and the right to use. Hepper: (Inaudible) I was just wondering if there was someway that something between you could be worked out for them to maybe landscape that or somehow provide you with some sort of buffer without having to redo their streets, their lots, their whole subdivision. I am just talking about that particular point not the whole configuration of the subdivision. Barnes: I would be nice to time something in up there, (inaudible) Kearney Place down Chateau Meadow all the way up through there. Mr. Johnson knows this, there is a lot of walkers and stuff that come all the way up and all the way to Eagle Road on that, so it provides kind of a recreation amenity in a sense right now. We feel that some kind of green buffer that could tie in, I don't' have a hard time with people walking up ad down, I think it is nice that there are those kinds of things left for people to be able to utilize. We are most concerned about the invasion of privacy and we have covered those things pretty much. Thank you. Johnson: Thanks John. !'~ ~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 35 Dale Sharp, 2445 Wingate Lane, was sworn by the City Attorney. Sharp: I have to go along with Mr. Barnes there, we do need a berm and a fence in between the subdivision there. You need to keep out the people that are coming down that ditch road there with motorcycles and 4 wheel vehicles and everything and they are throwing their trash out. I don't mind the walkers, if they keep the dogs on a leash because I have some cattle there and they come out and chase my cattle. And they run up and down that ditch road with their motorcycles as fast as they can go and I do resent that. And so if we are going to have a subdivision we need a berm, fence and to keep the kids and everything else off that ditch road. I do have some questions on the sewer and the highway traffic, the education. I am just, we have water problems but then we say Meridian is going to drill 2 more wells, but someplace along the line we are not going to have the water to support all of this that is going on. And we have a drought as you well know and we have had for quite a number of years. So I think we need to take a real hard look at what is going on here. And not only this subdivision but others. That is all. Johnson: Thank you, Don you had another comment? Bryan: I think I better clarify this ditch and this berm and this landscaping situation, this road that goes down this ditch right of way is my access to the head gate and in the previous developments to the west have already given up that right of way and fenced to the backyards through that area. And the road and the canal is just a no mans land with fencing on both sides like a corridor you drive your car through for access to those head gates along that canal. We just can't eliminate access to those and put a nice pathway that would be nice for having a pathway and a green belt along there for all the walkers for all the subdivisions but I don't know how they will take my driving down through the middle of them in my car trying to get to my head gate_ Hepper: We are talking about the north edge of this project, is that where your head gate is located? Bryan: That is where I pull my water from the main Stokesbury. It has already been provided in the previous developments with the fence on each side of the development and that 40 feet in the middle which is no mans land which is taken care of by the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District. In fact before they got their fences up I was driving my truck down through peoples back yards coming and going from the head gate that is probably why they put the fence up. It is going to be something that is going to have to be addressed before we start developing a green system along there. That is all I have. Johnson: Thanks Don, Burt. n n Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 36 Borrup: I was going to stand up and tell Mr. Hepper that property, to clarify one thing is owned by the property owners to the north of it, John, myself and Mr. Miller. I have enjoyed those trips up and down that ditch with Don and his vehicle to turn my irrigation in. Another problem is there is an active head gate that is used by Dale Sharp, Floyd Reichert and Vem Alleman ultimately to irrigate their property that is south of my property, almost splits my property in half. Even if it is tiled they are still going to have to get down there to activate their irrigation, to start and to stop it. So there are going to have to be means provided for that. So and as Don stated it isn't a case of just being able to run a road down there or just landscape it because Vern lives on Ustick and he has to conceivably easily access that to make a living. Something else that kind of perplexes me about this whole thing is PNE/Edmonds is starting up Packard Subdivision and they have also applied for the Brown property for lack of a better way to put it. At this point in time if they solely own Packard Subdivision I could understand their anxiety to get something put through with a lift station and so on and so forth. But they have a conceivable piece of property to develop far closer to the trunk line, far more in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan. If the City of Meridian is concerned about proper growth it complies with their property growth program far greater than to have a temporary lift station. If in fact they develop their first property first by the time it was completed they would more than likely be able to develop their second property without a lift station and a tax (inaudible) city of Meridian so they do have an option, they do have an opportunity to create revenue in their given trade without doing this property first. By doing this it not only sets a precedent for a lift station, but if you look at the big map and hypothetically the sewer trunk line does stop it is rendered basically the northeast corner of that mile section sewer less for who knows how long. And all that comes is real expensive horse property. So if growth is a concern of the City of Meridian and the sewer line is the necessity for growth I would encourage you to take a second look at this and encourage him to develop his first property first and then let the second property develop when the time is right and the roads are in and possibly another school is built or the case may be. Thank you. Johnson: Thank you Brockway: 1 was here before so I don't have to get sworn in again, I wanted to, it seems there is a mood to worry about the developer and keeping it at 128 lots. That is not sacred, if we put the 20 foot in at the north and put the berm in he ends of with 118 lots, so what. He has acct-cam system, just call it up and 1 /2 hour later you change it. It is no big deal. That is all I have to say. Johnson: Thank you, that probably falls under re-design somewhere. Anyone else? I will close the public hearing at this time. What would you like the next step to be gentlemen? Rountree: For discussion sake I would like to see findings of fact prepared just to digest Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 37 all of the testimony. (Discussion Inaudible) Johnson: You have the floor whatever you want. Rountree: (Inaudible) (End of Tape) Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I move that we have findings of fact and conclusions of law prepared by the City Attorney. Shearer: Second Johnson: Moved and seconded that we have the City Attorney prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law on this application, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Johnson: We will now have a 10 minute break please. TEN MINUTE RECESS Johnson: If we can call the meeting back to order please. ITEM #11: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR GREENHAVEN ESTATES BY THE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY: Johnson: I will now open the public hearing, if there is a representative for Greenhaven Estates would you please come forward. Gary Lee, 250 S. Beechwood, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Lee: This application before you is a request for annexation to R-4 zoning with a preliminary plat known as Greenhaven Estates. It is situated on North Meridian, a 1/4 south of Ustick, north of an existing subdivision called Lansbury Lane. This development will consist of 40 single family dwelling lots on about 14.88 acres resulting in a density of 2.7 lots per acre which is considerable less than the R-4 request. The minimum building lot size is as it is shown on the preliminary plat is about 80 by 164 foot in depth or 13,000 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: OCTOBER 11.1994 APPLICANT: PNE/EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 10 REQUEST: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PACKARD SUBDMSION AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: COMMENTS FORTHCOMING CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: COMMENTS FORTHCOMING CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: "REVIEWED" CITY FIRE DEPT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS US WEST: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: ~O e ~l ~%") ~, ~i~"" it ~;~~,~xQ",~ OTHER: HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY ~.- OFFICIALS COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., Clty Clerk n CITY OF MERIDIAN MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE ear GARY D. SM THS P.E. City Eng WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. S 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES upt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Planner & Zoning Administrator KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief IDAHO 83642 MERIDIAN W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief , JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Chairman -Planning 8 Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 4. 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/16/94 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST: Annexation/ zoning wit h a Preliminary slat for Packard Subdivision BY: PNE/ Edmonds Construction LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Dove Meadows Subdivision. and South of Carol's Subdivision #2 JIM JOHNSON, P2 MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MOE ALIDJANI, P2 MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) JIM SHEARER, P2 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT CHARLES ROUNTREE, P2 ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P2 CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT BOB CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) WALT MORROW, C/C U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) MAX YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) WATER DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF REC ION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY FILES OTHER: FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER ,~ '~, ~~: .. ~~~ a~ ~~~~~~~~~x OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chfet W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chiet WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney ~ /'1 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA CITY OF MERIDIAN WALT W. MORROW 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Planner & Zoning Administrator ~i E ..~ ~ ~anM PlOann nON Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 9 S Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-221 I nn ! [~ GRANT P. KINGSFORD ~~~ ~ U lad Mayor ~~.~: ;~ g TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 4, 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/16/94 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST: Annexation/ zoning with a Preliminary slat for Packard Subdivision BY: PNE/ Edmonds onstruction LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Dove Meadows Subdivision. and South of Carol's Subdivision #2 JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P2 CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C -WALT MORROW, C/C -MAX YERRINGTON, C/C -WATER DEPARTMENT -SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT -POLICE DEPARTMENT -CITY ATTORNEY -CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: ~T~ 0 '~ YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ~ ~~~ a ~ e as ~;~ w~~ t- n ~ S~. _riINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS .~+ 4 - ~-y y ,- Bob L. Haley OQ EXCEL ~~g««~r ~ ~'* ~--_~ DEPUTYSUPERINTENDENT Dan Mabe, Finance & Administration @ ~~. _ t` ~t~;~), ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT ~.~ /+~~?y~ ~ `i 3J"? Christine Donnell, Personnel & Instruction ~~~`~~~ ~ 4.1 i a C~~ ~~~~1~ DIRECTORS Sheryl Belknap, Elementary Jim Carberry, Secondary Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911MERIDIANSTREET • MERIDIAN,IDAH083642 • PHONE(208)888-6701 2 Q ~~ October 3, 1994 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Packard Subdivision Dear Councilmen: I have reviewed the application for Packard Subdivision and find that it includes approximately 136 homes at a median value of $120,000. We also find that this subdivision is located in census tract 103.11 and in the attendance zone for Chief Joseph Elementary, Meridian Middle School and Meridian High School. The School District may be required transport elementary students from this subdivision to Ridgewood Elementary or another school that may have capacity, due to overcrowding at Chief Joseph Elementary. Using the above information we can predict that these homes, when completed, will house 46 elementary aged children, 33 middle school aged children, and 31 senior high aged students. At the present time Chief Joseph Elementary is at 101 of capacity, Meridian Middle School is at 139 of capacity and Meridian High School is at 130 of capacity. The Meridian School District is not opposed to growth in our district, however this subdivision will cause increased over- crowding in all three schools. There is little opportunity to shift attendance boundaries since the surrounding schools are also well over capacity. Before we could support this subdivision, we would need land dedicated to the district or at least made available at a minimum price for a school site in this area. The site would need water and sewer services available. In addition we would need to pass another bond issue for the construction of schools. Even if we were willing to use portable classrooms for a year or two, this project would require two classrooms at the elementary level, one at the middle school level and one at the high school level. To build portables ready to occupy by students will cost approximately $40,000 each. As you can see the total for four /"r /'~ portables would be $160,000. We would welcome a meeting with you to find ways of mitigating the projected costs to the school district. We are in a difficult position and need your help in dealing with the impact of growth on schools. Sincerely, ~~~~ Dan Mabe Deputy Superintendent DM:gr 09/27/94 10:29 $208 345 7650 /'1 acxn ~ ool/ool ~~~~~ V ~~ c GLENN J. RHODES, President SHERRY R. HUBER. Vlce President JAMES E. BRUCE, Secretary S ~ ~' 2 ~ 1994 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE: September 27, 1994 TO: MERIDIAN CITY HALL 33 E. IDAHO MERIDIAN ID 83642 pp,X # 887-4813 FROM: ACHD Development Services Division RE: ANNEXATION/ZONBYG pNE%EDMONDSLCONSTRUCT ON FOR PACKARD SUBDIVISION This project is of sufficient size, and/or is sxpe defer aleofrthe traffic impacts such that thi anon unt 1~the required Traffic public hearing for this app Study has been .approved by the District's Traffic Services Department. The District will notify you and the applicant, as soon as possible, after completion of the review and approval. ACHD requests the lead agency to include the results and recommendations of the approved Traffic Study in the public hearing process. This delay will allow the public informed about the traffic issues making any decisions. and the lead agency to be better related to this project prior to cc: TEp,I,EY'S LAND SURVEYING - (Fax #336-8033) PNE/EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION - (Fax #888-7266) ACRD Traffic Services - Dave Szplett Ada Planning Association - Erv Olen (Fax #345-5279) Project File Chron ads county highway district 318 East 37th • Bolse. Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 SEP 2? '94 10 20 208 345 ?650 PAGE.01 ~~~,~. SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET SAP Z ~ ~~ CITY OF MERIDIAN Proposed Development Name PACKARD SUB City MERIDIAN Date Reviewed 9/22/94 Preliminary Stage XXXXX Final Engineer/Developer Tealev's Land Survevina / PNE & Edmonds Contruction The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Boise City Street Name Ordinance. The following existina street names shall appear on the slat as• "N. HICKORY AVENUE" "E MEADOW WOOD STREET" "E. KATELYN STREET" "N. JUSTIN PLACE" "E. OAKCREST STREET" The street that is stubbed on the east side of the plat is in alignment with an existina street and therefore shall be named: "E. CHATEAU DRIVE" The following new street names are approved and shall appear on the plat as: The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE, Ada County Engineer John Priester Ada Planning Assoc. Terri Raynor Meridian Fire District Representati Y RE,FfRE$'ENTAJIVES OR DESIGNEES Date Date J ,~~- Date NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will ng~e signed !!!! Sub Index Street Index /1 / J NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS O1 ~ ZZ `7 have it approved by the street name committee. ~ /'~ CENTRAL •• DISTRICT '~~'HEALTH DEPARTMENT Rezone # REVIEW SHEET RECE~~'~~~ Environmental Health Division ~ ~ T Q ~ ~~~~! CITY E~~- ('~>L~,l;if~~~ Con 'Tonal Use # reliminary final /Short Plat ~/9`4i~~h2l~ S'd~d ~ d~S iDN Return to: ^ Boise ^ Eagle ^ Garden city Meridian ^ Kuna ^ Acz ^ I. We have Objections to this Proposal. ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. We can Approve this Proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: ^ 2 feet ^ 4 feet 7. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage ~ central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water 8. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines S~central water 9. Street Runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ 10. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ I I. ^ t2. ~. 13. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store ~i ~.f /,S ,4r~ ~iLEa tai' fi~i~l, .S'6'ASa~ut. 6~/~W~'' ~'~ Date: _~/ 3 /~ viewed By: CDHD 10/91 rcb, rev. II/93 jll /~( GO/rJ~! ~d M70.^~ /'~ /'t CENTRAL •• DISTRICT ~~ DEPARTMENT MAIN OFFlCE • 707 N. ARMSTRONG PL • BOISE, ID. 83704 • (208) 375-5211 • FAX: 327-8~0 To prevent and treat disease and disability; to promote healthy lifestyles; and to protect and promote the health and quality of our environment. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that the first one half inch of stormwater be pretreated through a grassy Swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality. The engineers and architects involved with the design of this project should obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals that could be used for guidance are: 1) STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND, State of Washington Department of Ecology, February 1992 2) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER AND SITE DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT 3) CALIFORNIA BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE HANDBOOK Prepared by Camp Dresser and McKee, Larry Walker Assoc., Uribe and Assoc., Resources Planning Assoc., for the Stormwater Quality Task Force 4) URBAN STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL Volume 3, Best Management Practices Stormwater Quality Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Denver, Colorado Salving Dalley, Elnwre. Boise. and Ada Counties Ada / Boise Candy 08ke WIC Base - Aleridan i07 ~!. Amsrtong PL 1606 Rooerts 8oae. ip..83104 Base.10. 5nno. Heodh: 327.7499 83705 Ph 334355 ~Ctifdy Ptatvrir~ 327-7400 324 Metidiort. ID. YrnTxxdaations:327.l450 83642 Ph. 888525 t~hidarx 327.7460 WIC:327-7488 Etrnore Couery OtAce 520E 8th Sheet N. MauntOin Horne.lD. 83647Ph.587.4407 8mon CouNy Otbce d 6nirdunardd Heotlh 190 S. 41h Street E MountCnfkxne.ID. 83657 Fh.581-9225 VaBeq Cournr OtBa P.0.8aK 14~ McC~. iD. 83638 Ph.634.7194 LJ OFFICIALS /'~ ~ HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. Clty Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 8884433 • FAX (208) 887813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner 8 Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman • Planning & Zoning 1 .. ~`` =1a~ '~ i''3AN TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVE ~ L , ,ACTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: Qctober 4 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/16/94 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST: Annexation/ zonir~,g with a Preliminary ulat for Packard Subdivision BY: PNE/ Edmonds Construction LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Dove Meadows Subdivision. and South of Carol's S bdivision #2 - JIM JOHNSON, P2 MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT} JIM SHEARER, P2 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT CHARLES ROUNTREE, P2 ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P2 CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR ~NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT BOB CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) - WALT MORROW, C/C U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) - MAX YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) WATER DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) SEWER DEPARTMENT CITY FILES BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT OTHER: Nam a & Meridian Irrigation YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: P POLICE DEPARTMENT District's Stokesberry Lateral courses along the north CITY ATTORNEY boundary of the project. The right-of-way of the .Stokesberry CITY ENGINEER Lateral is 40 feet: 20 feet from the center each way. - CITY PLANNER See Idaho Code 42-1208--RIGHTS-OF-WAY NOT SUBJECT TO rooThTQ The deve ADVEK~r i-iriir » ~ . lg-ger must contact John Anderson or Bill Henson at 466-(lh(„ nT 'i45 X431 fnr a r oyal before any encroachment or change of right of way ~~r~ Thic n;Str;~r re~tt;r es that ~ Land Use Change/Site Development application be 466-7861 occ filed for review rior to final platting. Contact Donna Moore at or Municipal t for further information. All e laterals and waste ways must be protec surface draina e must be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, ended i s recomm Nampa & Meridian Irri ation District must review drainage plans. It ithin this District. that irri at ion water be made available to all developments w ~EC~ ~z~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~l rintendent S stant Water .1 Henson B~ ~~~ l upe Nampa & Meridian Irrigation D istrict C~~ ~~ ~~~~~A~ OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., Clty Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. Clty Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chlet W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY n A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 88711813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner 8 Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman -Planning 8 Zoning TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 4 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/16!94 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST: Hnnexationl zoning with a Preliminarv~lat for Packard Subdivision gY: d onds Co st ction LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Dove Meadows Subdivision and South of Carol's Subdivision #~ JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P2 CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C -BOB CORRIE, C/C -WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT -SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: We require a permanent 10-foot wide public utilities easement along all lots adjacent to a road right-of-way dedicated to public or private use. pp _ Tim Adams ~-~ ~vM'^s ~~~~; ~ ~'..a~ Idaho Power ~ ~ Zo-q~ 322-2047 ~ ~ ~~ ~~~:~~yr~9; ' ^ /'\ HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY COUNCIL MEMBERS OFFICIALS A GOOCI puce to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer CITY OF MERIDIAN MIORROW w AT W GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer . SHARI STILES BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. JOHN T 33 EAST IDAHO Planner 8 Zoning Administrator . KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chlef MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 JIM JOHNSON W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chiet phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887813 Chairman -Planning 8 Zoning WAVNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning 8~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 4 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/16/94 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST: Annexation/ zoning with a Preliminary plat for Packard Subdivision BY: PNE! Edmonds Construction LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: "forth of Dove Meadows Subdivision. and South of Carol's Subdivision #2 JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P2 JIM SHEARER, P2 CHARLES ROUNTREE, P2 TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C -BOB CORRIE, C/C -WALT MORROW, CIC -MAX YERRINGTON, C/C -WATER DEPARTMENT -SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT -POLICE DEPARTMENT -CITY ATTORNEY -CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT} ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM St FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: S ~ ~' 3 0 1~~4 CIT~t O~ I~t~~z~~IAN OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNEG. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney MEMORANDUM: GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor To; Mayor, City Council, Planning & Zoning COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAXYERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner & Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman -Planning & Zoning October 5, 1994 From; Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer ~~'~d'"` ~y~,.t~ EC~.:~ Rick Clinton, Engineer Tech. 0 C T 0 ~ ;~~~; Re; PACKARD SUBDIVISION ~;~~`~ ~,~~ i~~,~:a~tr~t~ (Annexation /Zoning & Preliminary Flat} I have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, for your information and consideration as conditions of the applicant during the hearing process: 1. Determine the seasonal high ground water elevation, and profile the sub-surface soil conditions. 3. The Preliminary Plat map contour lines need to be tied to an established Benchmark. 4. Any existing irrigation ditches crossing the property to be included in this platting, shall be tiled per City Ordinance. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate Irrigation/Drainage District. 5. Please provide a master street drainage plan that includes the method of disposal & approval from the affected drainage district. 6. Submit the proposed restrictive covenants and/or deed restrictions for review. 7. Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision name and street names. 8. Coordinate the fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian's Water Works Superintendent. 9. Existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this subdivision will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for non domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 10. Please review the letter from the Ada County Highway District dated 9/27/94, requesting "deferral of the public hearing for this application until the required traffic study has been approved by the districts Traffic Services Department" . Submit to the City, information C: \W PW IN60\GENERAL\PACKARD. P&Z HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 /'~ /~ detailing the traffic impact on existing or adjacent roadways & intersections. 11. Water service to this development is contingent on positive results from a hydraulic analysis by our computer model. 12. The Preliminary Plat map needs to be stamped, signed, and dated by the Design Engineer or Land Surveyor. 13. Provide statements of dedications to the public and/or easements, together with a statement of location, dimension and purpose of such. 14. The legal description submitted with this application and the Preliminary Plat map don't follow the boundaries of the adjacent Plats of Record. Bearing and Distance calls that don't match should be referenced as "Information of Record" . Please clear up these discrepancies and re-submit a new legal description per Resolution 158 (Aug. 16, 1994). 15. Any proposal for a supplementary connection from the City's water system to the pressurized irrigation system being proposed will need to be reviewed closely due to the size of the area to be watered. 16. The cul-de-sac length of Justin place as shown on the Preliminary Plat map exceeds the maximum allowed by Meridian City Ordinance 524, 4-3-90. 17. The Preliminary Plat map needs to show Wingate Place Subdivision as a recorded subdivision and Dove Meadows #Z as proposed. 18. Government Corners referenced in the legal description, need to be shown on the Preliminary Plat map. 19. Sanitary Sewer service to this development doesn't appear to be feasible as it is shown on the Preliminary Plat map. With the current state of the South Slough Sewer Interceptor being roughly 112 mile northwest of this parcel a temporary sewage lift station seems to be the best case scenario. The details of the placement and configuration of this temporary lift station need to be worked out with this department. C: \WPWIN60\GENERAL\PACKARD. P&Z HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney /°d A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning & Zoning Com fission, Mayor and Council . ~~~r~~ ~~~~i L. Stiles, Planning & Zoning Administrator October 7, 1994 COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAk YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner & Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman -Planning 8 Zoning Annexation and Zoning with a Preliminary Plat for Packard Subdivision 1. Unless lot lines are adjusted, Lots 45 and 60, Black 8, will need directional arrows indicating frontage on Oakcrest Drive. 2. Justin Place culdesac length, as well as block lengths, will require a variance. 3. All ditches require tiling in accordance with Meridian City Ordinance. Obtain approvals from appropriate irrigation district(s). 4. Development agreement is required as a condition of annexation. 5. ACHD is requesting deferral of this project until a traffic study can be completed. 6. Perimeter fencing to be installed prior to obtaining building permits unless this requirement is specifically waived in writing. 7. Applicant should receive Mayoral commendation for offering to provide and develop park space without expecting some "deal" in return. _r ,~. ---~ ~. GLENN J. RHODES, President :HERBY R. HUBER, Vice President ,'AMES E. BRUCE. Secretary TO: ACRD Commission FROM: Development Services INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE PACKARD/DSTECH 11-9-94 DATE: November 4, 1994 SUBJECT: ANNEXATION AND PRELIMINARY PLAT - Packard Subdivision Meridian {Developer - PNE/Edmonds Construction, 3131 Lanark, Meridian ID 83642) (Engineer/Surveyor - Tealey's Land Surveying, 109 5 4th Street, Boise ID 83702) PRELIMINARY REPORT - NOT FINAL UNTIL APPROVED BY THE ACRD COMMISSION FACTS & FINDINGS: 1. Packard is a 128-lot single family subdivision generally locat- ed north of Fairview Avenue and west of Eagle Road. A concur- rent annexation/zoning request is also part of this applica- tion. The site is bordered by the existing subdivisions of Kearney Place on the west, Morning Dove on the southwest, and Carol's on the north. 2. GENERAL INFORMATION: LEAD AGENCY - Meridian ZONING - existing RT, requested R-4 FEET OF NEW PUBLIC STREETS - 6,400 ACRES - 39.87 LOTS - 136 total, 128 buildable ESTIMATED VEHICLE TRIPS PER DAY - 1280 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE - 265 L.F. OF FRONTAGE ON Hickory Avenue - 60 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP DESIGNATION ADA COUNTY RIDGE-TO-RIVERS PATHWAY PLAN - EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY - 60-feet REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY - 60-feet Hickory Avenue is improved to a 41-foot stubs into this site. - Local No pathway shown street section and IMPACT FEE BENEFIT ZONE - West Ada IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - Western Cities ~.~., N ~ V 0 4 ~9~4 ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 PRELIMINARY PLAT -j~ckard Subdivision ~{ November 4, 1994 Page 3 SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: 1. Extend Hickory Avenue north to the intersection with the stub street from the west as a 41-foot street section with 5-foot sidewalks within 60-feet of right-of-way. 2. With the exception of the southern most lot on the west side of Hickory Avenue, direct lot access will be restricted on Hickory Avenue south of the intersection with Oakcrest Drive. Said lot shall locate its driveway 5-feet south of its north- ern boundary. 3. Construct all internal streets (excluding Hickory extended) to a 37-foot back-to-back street section with 4-foot sidewalks within 50-feet of right-of-way. 4. The District will not sign the plat for any part of this subdi- vision until the adjacent street system (Hickory Avenue) that it connects to becomes part of the public street system. STANDARD REQUIREMENTS: 1. Street and drainage improvements required in the public right- of-way shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and policies. 2. Dedicated streets and drainage systems shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and poli- cies. 3. Specifications, land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACRD shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54-1215. 4. Provide written approval from the appropriate irriga- tion/drainage district authorizing storm runoff into their system. 5. Locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drain- age appurtenances, etc.) outside of the proposed street im- provements. Authorization for relocations shall. be obtained from the appropriate entity. 6. Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across par- cel. 7. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District for review and appropriate. action. PRELIMINARY PLAT ~ackard Subdivision ~,,,` ' November 4, 1994 Page 5 14. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any require- ment or policy outlined herein. shall be made, in writing, to the Manager of Engineering Services within 15 calendar days of the original Commission action. The request shall include a statement explaining why such a requirement would result in substantial hardship or inequity. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. STAFF SUBMITTING: DATE OF COMMISSION APPROVAL: Karen Gallagher Wtl sY1 'LLC11l• ml ~ .1 M 4 'A 91~VY9 ~. OM *YIfm X11{01 Mi / w • Id'a 'NI i ~Il A ~// Y f~ M ~1 otw~-rns aan t..... +vs Hots~aena aurx~va ,ao a,rta xxvxinn3xa ~~ p ~ ~ ~ Q j G ~ ~ ~~~p~ °~ ~o= 5 s:3 ~ 0 ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ r ~s ~Q ~ ~ s ~~~ ~°~ ~ ~ ~a " 3 ~~ w =~ ~p~ ~ ~ ~~ °~~~ SEP-16-1994 09 24 TEALEY'S SURVEYING 1 GMVL 1 J a.n~~v ..,., ___... ~VEYING (2p8) ; 0636 Fax (208) 385-0696 Project No.: 1290 Date: September 15, 1994 DESCRIPTION FOR PACKARD PROPERTY - ANNEXATION PARCEL P.02 A parcel of land being the NW 1/4 SE 1/4 of Section 5, T.3N., R.lE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particulazly described as follows: Commencing at the South 1/4 corner of said Section 5, a point marked by a brass cap; thence along the North-South center of section line of said Section 5 North 0°27' 15" East 1312.52 feet to the Southwest corner of the said NW 1l4 of the SE 1/4, THE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 0°27' 15" East 1312.52 feet to the Northwest corner of said NW 1/4 of the SE 1 /4, marked by a SI8" iron pin; thence along the North line of said N W 1 /4 of the SE 1 /4 South 89°40'20" East 1324.78 feet to the Northeast corner of said NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4, marked by a 5/8" iron pin; thence along the East line of said NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 South 0°30'47" West 1310.88 feet to the Southeast corner of said NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4, mazked by a 5/8" iron pin; thence along the South line of said NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 North 89°44'36" West 1323.43 feet to THE POINT OF BEGINNING, Said parcel contains 39.87 acres, more or less. A 'T ~~' ~. ~v~_ ~, ~c~~% ~,,~~,~ SEP 16 '94 09 21 PAGE.02 SEP-16-1994 09 25 TERLEY'S SURVEYING ~~ .vt~~. ~' WARRANTY DEED .~ ~~ ~~~, }aa~.LVCa~ Emit C. Pdd~id and 'P81ma8~e Pam, h~bRad and wife. hece~~rpr refe~~d v~ as p~errb0ac, cbBe hE~ebY gt~Yt. ~ip3~• °~• and ~a~X ~° • kdmords Oo~ts„Cv,m, Itoc., an Ldatic vxpo~ and Pacific Nos'th+~t ~s+eCasC. ~" an ~~ to as tlcat-~9ia, t~t~ aspens addte0s ~ h~nafter reiexx+od 1966 N. Stansvsaw tn., AoL~e, ID, 83'!0 tt~e fp1lowitg +~-ys.~~ p~~• bo-vdt: 'Rtie North tx~lf o£ the Uea't half of Sauii~ Qom' ~ 5' 'POwr-shiP ~ North, ~~9'g 1 Fast, Boies Me~dse~1. ldd OwMY• Idetiv. 5339731 ~ RECOk~i~R EY 3 ~~ '93 ~iflY ~,6 P(1 `I 41 zo ~ ~*~ :~~ w~ the said c~-~• Masn th8sr 1°~ unto tt~e ~e fooc~e~r. ~ a,a aa+e ~' aoaa h°'oeb~r onus~ent pro~re. his he i.ts end a,sigae is ~ cx~er' 1n fao awe of easel to and with ~t.:: s;yid Wcante~a~ fx+e~a ~ all a'a ar1O°~'~ aa°c+ent 7f~'s a ~~; thaL ;-.~1.. C~'$°~ e~+d e~ U. S. pebent '- ' tevws, lc~vie-:, end atsr~ner- ~d tt~t (~nt~c' ~dll ~q~-ts of i~~oLd, c~nd ea9~~ v1.a1D1d ~ti sib ~~ yeoc;nnt ans det~d the s~ fztm all clss,ra wbateo~+~- ~d: ply 19. 1993. A~~+ ~- ~ F~~c,~. Ord ~Luedg4 ~~ c. srw~ o~ ..1~x~ ~ :~ ~~ ~ on Z.:is ~.~ay of ~"~Y• in t~ ~ 1993, bet+o:~e wg, a ~r ~ , ~ aedd s`t~,r ~ ~ e. s~I~7-lY app eC' 'y~ ~yp~ tc tt~ ~titixi Q[ iLa ~lYL l\~ \1 ~1.~Y W ~ ~ ~ ~~_J l.lY pw~. , „ ,, . •~~ , ~,:5 .... *,,.--. ~ r.,,...:,.,,.. T;tl~ ('{~vrrt)ct~l ti' c~f~ Iclul3sr SEP 16 '94 09 21 TOTAL P.03 PAGE.03 P.03 ~ '; ~ '~ ~, R-4 __ ~, 'RT -- '~~ '' RT '. - _-- __ ~ _ _ __ _ - _ _ - .~.. ro- ~ i. ~~ rR1 ~ t~NNlt~ _ - RT W ~ ~ ~ __~ R _ , ~99~_ ~~~ i 9 _, , ---- ' i V_ ~~ ~~ ~aE, ,, ~i ~~ ice` J -- _ (' _~ ~ ~i RT _ ~~ -- ~--- ~-~ -- _ _._-,- y~ , RT ~' ~ ~~_ -~~ ._ ~~~ -+ -- - ~ ~ _~ r~- - 1'~j' ~~ f - W' J -- RT ~ L-O `1r *--- --~ RT '~ RT '3r:- - i! ,. R RT `` ~ % ' ~\ -.~-..._ --__ ___ - -.- _ ~ ~~ _l _-.-'--_ ., -_._-•-~ __-i...-. ---T-~- --- -- --- - - -- - ~ ~ i i 1 1 ~ RT ~- TFiEASUAE ,'yg r- ~ '. ' i ~ - - ~ - --- VALLEY 1 ~ ~~--- - ~ -~ I I, - ---- ~ ' '~ PIEFaS?-1T { ~ BUS11E55 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ l.- _ ~ '~ VANE R ~~F F.rT:. ' --` --- ~' ~~ . f ` ~~ ce~vls~on , , ! -- RT - -- ---1- - -- --- i -- :~ ,,; ~ --- 1-L ~ l-L -ax~_1 ,~, RT I-L ~-. ~ r ' r J il~i.! `J ~ ~ • ~ ~ I I _~~aa .. ~ I r _ r Tl / O M77W W ,.. t~ g a ~ . - • ~ r E + ~ 1- t f 1 'i f f l• 1 a 1 ~ .~ . ~ 1 1 1 .. •i 3g 1 I I + t. ~ r ~ a, ~ _ ., ~ . s s t. I _ • B~FF s • ~ 1 r ~ ° = i , I 1 s. 1 yQ~ ! 'F • I j ~ •• i I t 1 sc,~ I 1 ~ { i t + i 1 ~ + L .+ i + ~L w ~ ~+.. 1 ~ 1 + l( y + y { I ~ 1 t y T t ~ 1 7 i! i •~ ~~ I t. .. .. ., ' _ _ ~ ~ .~ ~~I. ~ ---. - - r- • ..... - _ s ~ W ~~: 1 c+ I I t i a E+ f' I t E t I t ~~i~iiii' I n I t l I I L I • e i i I ~• ~ ~ I ~ . r r r 1~ tr a ~• ~ ~ I ~~, r ~B- '41' ! y' ... . §- ~ g ( t ~ INLATI® y ' 'I~ L OO OO ~g0 lYSF - MN~ Og7 ~~ ~ ~a~a ~ - ~~~ a~ g ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ I ~ a +~ ~ n in ~ ~ r ; ti ~~ a ~~~ ~ ~ ~ z D ~ ~~. ~ ~ ~ o Z~ PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PACKARD BVHDIVI3ION TEALfY'8 LAIR 01MIYE111N6 ~ ItE IM 1/• of TIE t t/•, amna a is a w n tos, two TaIA•tE, 0.11, R NFIIIOIMI. IOI~ COIMTY. WAI10 ORAl1all, T b 1'.107 AUWST. IM• 12W n APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION APPROVAL & ZONING OR REZONE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FILING INFORMATION L GENERAL INFORMATION ~kard Subdivision w (PROPOSED NAME OF SUBDIVISION) .~o~h of Dove ~ ows ~~; ~.th of Carol's„~u ivison.#2 (GENERAL LOCATION) See attached (LEGAL DESCRIPTION -ATTACH IF LENGTHY) PNElEdmonds Construction 8$8-'j~~5_ (OV~-~NER(S) OF RECORD) (NAME) (TELEPHONE NO. ) 3131. Lanar~_ Meridian (ADDRESS) 5~,~ (APPLICANT) (NAME) (TELEPHONE NO. ) {ADDRESS) Tealey's Land Survving ,~85-0636 (ENGINEER, SURVEYOR OR PLANNER) (NAME) (TELEPHONE NO. ) .149 So. 4th. St Boi=se (ADDRESS). (JURISDICTION(S) REQUIRING APPROVAL. Residential (TYPE OF SUBDIVISION -RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL) .39.87. ACRES OF LAND IN CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP. (ACCEPTED BY:) (FEE) REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION T_,1~MF. TALE FOR STTRMT~~T(~N; A request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerk's possession no later than three days following the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month the request was made. After a proposal enters the process, it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:00 P. M. , Thursday following the Planning and Zoning Commission action. 1. Name of Annexation ~ Subdivision: Packard Subdivision 2. General Location: north of Dove Me~lows Subdivision; cout_h of Caml's Subdivision 3. Owners of record: PNE/Edmonds Construction Address: 31 ian_ark Meridian ,Zip 83642. Telephone .888-7,~ 4. Applicant: Same Address: 5. Engineer: Firm• Tealey' and urveyng Address: ~Q9 S 4th St B4ice ,Zip $702 .Telephone 385-0636 6. Name and address to receive City billings: Name: _ P~,~(L onds Construction Address 3131. Lanark Meridia_n_ Telephone 888-7255 PRFa. iNARY P .AT C K~iCT; Subdivision Features 1. Acres 39.87 2. Number of lots _128 (b,~,(' } 3. Lots per acre 3.2~ 4. Density per acre 5. Zoning Classification(s) R-4 6. If the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridian City Limits but within the jurisdictional mile, what is the existing zoning classification? _An ex ion 'nto he city of Meridia i Dart of this a~lisation. 7. Does the plat border a potential green belt? No 8. Have recreational easements been provided for? Yes 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City? _ No Explain i0. Are there proposed dedications of common areas? __ Yes Explain This site includes ~,gp_roximately 4 95 acres of nark/ooer-~ ~P ~n b~cle ~3~Y_s~- 11. What school(s) service the area? Chief Jo~ph F.iementary Do you propose any agreements for future school sites? No Explain 12. Other proposed amenities to the City Water Supply City of Meridian Fire Department i , of eridian Other Explain 13. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial or combination) Residential 14. Type of dwelling{s) (Single Family, Duplexes, Multiplexes, other) Ste' gje~f ~,{y 15. Proposed Development features: a. b. c. d. Minimum square footage of lot(s): B~OtIO Minimum square footage of structure(s): x.,400 Are garages provided for? Square footage: Are other coverings provided for? (2) e. Landscaping has been provided for? Yes Describe .The nark and en ways will be landscaoed. f. Trees will be provided for? . Yes Trees will be maintained Homeowners and the Home t)wnerc Acenc,~ati~n g. Sprinkler systems are ,provided for as rea~,~,~by C~ pr i ance h. Are there multiple units No Type i. Are there special set back requirements? NQ Explain j. Has off-street pazking been provided for? Explain k. Value range of property 1. Type of financing for development m. Protective covenants were submitted? Date: 16. Dces the proposal land-lock other property? No Does it create enclaves? No 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks aze to be constructed to the standazds as required by the Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be five feet (5') in width. 2. 3. 4. 5. b. Proposed use is in conformance with the city of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Development will connect to City services. Development will comply with City ordinances. Preliminary plat will include all appropriate easements. Street names must not conflict with City grid system. (3) TE''''`_EY'S LAND SURVEYING August 23, 19~ Meridian Pty arxt ~ C©mmis~vn 33 East Idaho Street lean Idaho 8362 109 South 4'" Stream Boise, Idaho 83702 (208) 385-0636 Fax (208) 385-0696 ~: Packard Subdivision Preti~nary mat and Amrexation with Zane Aptrn ter ti+i~becs o€ttre ~rrrEmission: This is an apps by PlEdmonds Ccrnstniction seeking apgrovat ot'a ~elutdnary pit amt the ' a~34 `87 a+~es. The. pretinrnary .pta# consists oft 3tS krts trf wh~h t 2H wgt be dev~toped with ~-~ d'w~: eight (8~ tots. wdt' be cow open ~ area.. 'I"~-site is Ideated in the s~theast quarter. of lion 5, Town~hhp 3 North, Rage ~ of Boise ~, -Ada bounty, Naito. This site is located" betnind ttie Capitol` Christian Car anct northeast a~i3os-e Iadtrvvs Subdivision. The site is n~ pttY ~ the ciEy htnits of the ofl~~ As I ofthis 'Qn, we are crnwith ~ z~te designation of R-4 {Low I3e~iiy R~ee~al Tai). -Ctrtpctrycte s for the. caty o#"Arieri~an are next. to the ~t ark` south txnmdaries of is prc~ect. This ;-~ wiIl ~ tic ttte sewer water ~ of the city of Meridian. : The Meridian Cott~rensive P'lart Map des this site as '~ l~a~ Rasiden#iah'' and' '~#rtir~ad/Pted Use Thn~opntent"; however,. all of the site wdl be deed as re~d~-ogle- ~~. I withia this pm~osal` meet or exceed the honing fTirciinance si~ndards R-4 dewe+tont. d at<the rlc~pmeart ~ ~Cnateiy 4:9~ ass of coon, area.. Tl~ men ~ area, ~~ a tam, trrivate ne;g~trord" rtc C4:Z2 acres inte~cts with. y~ ~ k~s ~ the devetatt back directty orrto the p~tc. Thom ghat are ntrt next to t gave ass to the irk try bicycte and l Sttt^~ruttdittg #~ is a ntix crf uxs. The aa~ is in transition fixnn agritural .uses to r~iat yes. S c~~e site is the ~' Chrin Cetrter and the Ike Mks Subdisioa ' o€` the site lie Wingate Place Subdivision Kearney ~aoe ~~ Ncrrtti ~ the site is agri+c~ltucal larrnt attd Cards Subdivis~rn. P ofthe site is ~dopod ~ tam: Exert Cards Subdivision one~acne t~s, ofthe area has de,~etoped va~ith residential uses in the R-1t and'R-4 de~,y rte. ~`he ag~c~tturat tends in the area rernsn as rwe~i 1e~s. ~. The hom~wners' association will maintain the landscaped common areas. As stated previously, the park area is designee} for ready access by the residerns of the devele~rt. 1~euces wdl be installed' along the .,perimeter of the site to provide a buffer from the adjoining land uses. A pressurized irrigation system .will be developed according. to the prov~ons of the Meridian Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. This. develop~neni con~les with the provisions of the Meridian Zoning t)q'dinance, espe~lly the and dimensional standaa'ds of the R-4 Zone. The minimum lot size is 8,t30D .square feet with the minimum dwelling- ..size of 1, ware feet. Streets are designed for intereronnecton with lazal t Fa'°~ - P~-g8h traffic mutes. The streets are fifty feet {30~ wide with five foot {5~ sidewalks. Sidewalks connect to bic~~clefpe~~rstrian paith~ways far ease of passage in and through the development. Due to the lack of itrtersecting,streets from the exterior of~l~w. prarpased development, some blocks are ' than by tl~e ~ (}~-~- Locations of streets exituzg -the subdivision were de~t~ ~ either' existing streets or by requirements of the Ada Cexmty H~3hway District. And,. to provide continuity of the pathway system,. one cul-de-sac {Tustin Flame) is lc~r~er than recommended by the ~ Ordinance. With these constraints in mind, we are asking that the Commission waive the maximum block length standard. the cul-de-sae; length provision. Our propasat oars the uffique feature of a large park. 'The park is for the use and enjoyment of the residents of the develt. This park is accessible from all parts. of the subdivision. This is a qty de~~t that will e~nle the area. The Pacltard Subdivision proposal includes several larger lots. adjoining Carol's Subdivision #2. The lots, which. are approximately ~ 3 ~9I square feet in size, provide a bum .between the one-acre lots of Carol's Subdivision #2 and the lots of this proposal- in ~, we are serg azmexation of 39.87 acres with a concurrent zoo ofi~-4. Arai,. we are approval of the prr~aty plat of Packard Subdivision, a 13S Tot resnderrtial subdivision. The proposal examples with the. provisi~ of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and the Meridian Zoning. flrd'inanc~. We n~`~ec~ ask that the Commis~on make a ~sitive recommenda#ion to the City Cenu~ concerning. this request. Re~ectfulty, Patrick A. Tealey Tealey's Land Surveying gy ~~ ~- Ted Hutchinson ~~ i~ 2 N. ~ ~~ /3~ss'a ~~. p ~-- 15m 75 O E~0 30® 45m ', SCALE M FEET ~ 111 = 3m~' ~:~ / I` ' _ _ _ / ,~ 8_SU~ • I~ 7 a -' J a j to I l Y _._ _._ _ ___ • ^ 16 = II ~- I~ ~ 12 4 ,. r. • t , ~Ol ~ i / I, ~lsl ~ II ~ ~ _ • ELYN DR. ~• _ ~ ~ - - - - - - - --~. 17 I '13 A,~ E r 11 • • 1 ! • i i r = t~• 1 • t- I! s 1 y 1~ ~ i t 1. s.. ' t • z w N0. 31z -~ I . r I _ ~ ,, - r• 7 8 2 13 ~ 14 ' 3 -I -~ I. s• '• 1 ~ I w 1^ s 1 .. D. f O r t • ~ ~• r d. A J ~ • 1 1' 1 1 '• ! I• • __ F ,~ ~ ~ q Q._ • 111 • Iii ,i ~~ ~ , i, ~ ,i1 n111 . i 10 11 Z 3 ~2 (7 .. • 1.1 r • I t s s 1_ I r r "~ r • r r r r !: _ .. .. - rawreowaoo t 6 7 8 9 IO I I 12 1 3 ~ ~' .. i 1 _'n'^ w. :: ! I i •• i I• T s •' y •1 Y ^ r r. _ _. _ 6 _ 5 _ I _. .d i___ ~ 1 ` 1 ~w .. . ~ i r i l 1 a t` d ., 1• i t I 2~ (' ~a 1'to~ 1 1 : t i . . • .. i 1 . E. MEADOW W..OD DR }~-Ti ~- 1 '• 1 1 ~• ! ! " Ii r . 3 3 3 r. ! i, Yi a i , r . ~~ I 1 rC~ z ~ a .. ~ i ' i E. MEADOW WOO[ r Y '~1OP1-= •` 1 I n I l I r 1 r W/ . • a I r II ' i. i l I r 2 n' ( I I 10 a ~ I I ~ 1 • 1 1 '• 1 1 •• t 1 •+ l .. r W ` 1 . . I• 1 r Z 9 ` 2~ . I r r''1 •• 1 1 r .fi r i f r v r . r I . , • •i r z a • . ~ r \` ~,. .. r r .. r ..~ r r r ~~ ~~,~~ 6~i ' •••••••••••••• ••••; 61 PROPOSED ~ ~~ ~ PACKARD j SUBDIVISION i e s 2 I to ~ 7 6 5 4 3 9 g 7~ 6 E•' A ~ s _ E APPICOO DR. I PICOT Cr s / I ~ O~ ~ a 23 16 17 18 19 2J '~ 22 2 / 3 4 ~I IJ 9 B 7 F 5 4 3 = 1 " I N' C ERit~`A N H/ E GRAPEW000 DR. z 0'QY ; 13 12 i, 'O 9 8 7 6 S 4 I 3 !~ u •• ~ ~ 1 .: .,,~ 1 ~ RI - ~ ; RT LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET OF PACKARD SUBDIVISION R129455f1084 81294550085 81294550090 Richard & Diana Berry William & Mary Ball Jon & Marilyn Barnes 1082 Justin PI 2058 Justin Pl 1034 Justin Pl Meridian Id 83642 / Meridian Id 83642 ,/ Meridian Id 83642 81294550095 81294550100 51105142220 Douglas & Rance Mellor Dennis & Mary Brockway Properties West, Inc. 1035 Justin Pl ~ 1059 Justin Pl ~ P.O. Box 2797 ~ Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 Boise Id 83701 51105131690 51105131550 51105244550 & 51105244700 Wilbur & Carol Vincent .Burke & Linda Borup Fred & Ane Sharp 5918 Sterling Dr ~'~ 2640 N. Wingate Ln / 2445 N. Wingate Ln ~ Boise Id 83703 Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 S1105244350 & S1145244300 S110S315105 & S1I05315224 51105315110 Floyd Reichert Wingate Partnership Albert & Maxine Monroe 2575 N. Wingate Ln ` 2119 Chateau , 2170 Dixie Meridian Id 83642 ~ Meridian Id 83642 ~ Meridian Id 83642 51105315226 51105346800 51105438500 Norman & Donna Barker ~ David Leader ~ Capitol Christian Center, Inc. 19405 Deerwood Dr ' 1110 Parkway Dr 306 N. 14th St , Volcano CA 95689-9771 Boise Id 83706 ~, Boise Id 83742 51105449000 84846540120 84846540130 Walter & Eugene Kleiner / Stephen & Celia Willmore Timothy 8i Sherri Bacharach P.O. Box 4003 ! 2286 N. Wingate PI 2304 N. Wingate Pl Bellevue WA 98004 Meridian Id 83642 ~ Meridian Id 83642 / 84846540140;0150;0160;0170 & 84846540190 84846540200 0180 Paul Jeran James & Sandra Nfiller D.W. Inc . J 2311 N. Wingate Pl 2287 N. Wingate PI 2119 Chateau Dr Meridian Id 83642 ~ Meridian Id 83¢42 Mendtan Id 83642 / 84846540210 84846540220 84846540230 I Amy & Jon Johnson f Jeffrey & Jill Feeler ~ ~ Blackstead Builder§, Inc. 2288 N. Devlin Ave 2312 W. Devlin Ave 12554 W. Bridger Suite 120 Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 Bois id 83704 n 84846540240 84846540250 84846530220 Christopher & Lisa Peters Lloyd Porter / Steven Dirschl / 2358 N. Devlin Ave ~ 2376 N. Devlin Ave 2202 N. Wingate Pl Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 Meridian id 83642 84846530230 84846530240 84846530250 Douglas & Jacquelyne Kaltenecker Jacquelilne Chambers Steven & Lynn Shigeno 2224 N. Wingate Pl / / 2250 N. Wingate PI / 2268 N. Wingate Pl / Meridian Id 83642 , Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 84846530180 84846530190 84846530200 Darren & Vicki Peterson Kevin Wood Richard & Natalie Martin 2279 N. Wingate Pl 8t Tania Williams-Wood / 2248 N. Devlin Ave Meridian Id 83642 ~ 2255 N. Wingate Pl Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 84846530210 84846530160 84846530170 James Rice .Michael & Heidi Kempel Betina J. Wolf 2262 N. Devlin Ave ,/' 2337 E. Chateau Dr & Jed T. Yore Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642/ 2359 E. Chateau Dr /,- Meridian Id 83642 89467170010 89467170020 89467170030 ~ Gerald & Nancy Elliott Robert & Betty Golse Susanne Barry 5652 N. Crimson Ave ~` 2166 N. Wingate Ave ~°' 2390 E. Meadow Wood St Boise Id 83703 Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 '89467170040 894671?0050 89467170060 Schaffner Construction, Inc. Burt Smith Construction, Inc. Genoveva Miyasato 2402 W. Jefferson #12 j 3877 Bunchberry Way 2054 N. Wingate Pl ,/ Boise Id 83702 ,/ Boise Id 83704 / Meridian Id 83642 89467170070 89467160084 89467170090 Thomas & Deme Mohr Leroy Youngquist j Michael & Mary Markley P.O. Box 9283 / 2022 N. Wingate Pl J 2015 N. Wingate Pl / Boise Id 83707 Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 89467170100 89467170110 & 89467170160 89467170120 Darin & Angela Lindig Benco, Inc. Brent & Kristin Hadle , 2029 N. Wingate Pl ,~ 3415 Terry Dr. ,/ y 2069 N. Wingate Pl Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 R9467170I30 89467170140 8946?170150 C. Jack & Sabin Coon '~ Corinne Hetmer James & Ruth Naaf 2355 E. Meadow Wood Dr 2092 N. Devlin Ave 2187 N. Wingate Ave Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 89467170170 89467170180 89467170190 Doug & Holly Erdman Steve & Lynna Bolton Gene & Lorraine Maynard 10010 W. Irving ~, 2128 N. Devlin Ave f' . 2150 N. Devlin Ave Boise Id 83704 t Meridian id 83542 Meridian Id 83642 81914250090; 0100; 0540; 0550; 0560 David & Mary Leader 110 Parkway Dr Boise Id 8~3C~4~ $'~~c ~ - n NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., on October 11, 1994, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of PNE/Edmonds Construction, for annexation and zoning of approximately 39.87 acres of land located in the NW 1 /4, SE 1 /4 of Section 5, T.3N, R.1 E, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is generally located North of Dove Meadows Subdivision and South of Carol's Subdivision No. 2. The Application requests annexation with zoning of R-4. Further Applicant requests Preliminary Plat approval of the parcel of land above described for 128 single family dwelling lots for Packard Subdivision. Amore particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the Application is available upon reques#. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Dated this 19th day of September, 1994. _ ~ ~/ WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CITY CLERK n NOTICE OF HEARING aOTICE iS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and taws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., on June 20, 1995, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of PNE/Edmonds Construction, for annexation and zoning of approximately 39.87 acres of land located in the NW 1 /4, SE 1 /4 of Section 5, T.3N, R.1 E, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is generally located North of Dove Meadows Subdivision and South of Carol's Subdivision No. 2. The Application requests annexation with zoning of R-4. A more particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Dated this 30th day of May, 1995. _~~ ~.~ WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., ITY CLERK ~ 4MP m, 1iN1RyY uw aar ,_~Rl3aMC1 _ Y NOLL~3S Y/I X 3Mi A s/1 _ MN 3Ml ' .~ ~~ 91N119Atlfl8 ONr~ 8J131Y31 AfOISIAIOHRS Qiit^I~dd " ~So Id ,<2IN:~II 30 Stl IIT 3?Id O Q m ~ f5 w U _ ~- to ~ S ~ ~ {L Q ~~ 3 3 l b1 Z 3 N G 1t a W ~ U ~ ~ ~ s i ~ ~~ ~ 8~ o E Z : d Z Q ota m ~ ~ ~:_~ ~ ~4 ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ p ~ ~ m ~ z to ~~ ~ ~ I o o n ~ rc w w ~ ~ ~~_ o ~ ~u ~ Q ~' I I I 0 ~ 8 ~ ZmZ>~ ~ 0 ~ Q a a° ° ~ u ~ ~~8~ - ~ O ~° ' . i w - Q U ag (~aa ti '" ^ ~ ~ s„~~ wa b S~o~C .w~ ,4 ~lU~_ a~ ~ _ tt t3 WW /~ ~ ` ' Q _ 4 ~ J~ V ~r J O Y LLnm~ Q Y I ~daY ¢a~ia ZI J ~ z 0 ~ ;~ .. q ^ 4 u ~, u~ ~'~< ise,°4 sif ~~ ~h: i4` ~~ :» ,3~ ~o ~~e ~~ w~ ~_ ~,- ~> - o< Wv~ ~ D E b N to A T'~p mmAS~r (1 Z D O ~ ~ w m~~~ 3~ 2 ~~ o - b E - 3. mNrt~ ~; _ O ~~~:p _ ymwu A p_ ptn° -p ;11 `P~~3 L A o mpn aoa < - - ~AZ 6: 4 m O< ~{8 j~ - y IJ~ n 6m2 Ay~ ~ n ® . p 0~ ~° Y A ~ ~<m~ ~i o ~ m ~ { : © ~ e ~ w mo - 3 ~ e ~m A A ~ ~ O ~ m g O g m A ~ m To,m T m~ o Z A D o A p~ m~i~ 'r•b~ z 4~ o ~i o w ~ N ~ = m m D A til A E A o ~ ~ ~ g ~ b~ Z 8888°m~' a ~ c ~~z -_ D~ _ ~ 8 -Z ~ a m d b N = A ~ ~o~ove n ~ ~ ~ ~ J a y A ~ ~ ^ s ~ m ~ ~ - 4 3~~~~: ~ p C1 ~ D o °z N -i R }n Q ~ Z