The URL can be used to link to this page

Hartford Subdivision AZ PP • • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live COUNCIL MEMBERS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer RONALD R. TOLSMA GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer CITY OF MERIDIAN MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WALT W. MORROW JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste watersupt. 33 EAST IDAHO KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief MERIDIAN IDAHO 83642 , SHARI STILES Planner a Zoning Administrator WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887813 JIM JOHNSON Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 Chairman - Planning S Zoning GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, may we have your answer by: Mav 24. 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 5/3/94 HEARING DATE: 5/31/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning with a Preliminary Plat for Hartford Subdivision BY: Viiva Laxmi Development and Hubble Engineering LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Ustick Road East of Ten Mile Road JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z -CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z .-TIM HEPPER, P/Z -GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR -RONALD TOLSMA, C/C -BOB CORRIE, C/C -WALT MORROW, C/C ,.-MAX YERRINGTON, C/C -WATER DEPARTMENT -SEWER DEPARTMENT -BUILDING DEPARTMENT -FIRE DEPARTMENT -POLICE DEPARTMENT -CITY ATTORNEY -CITY ENGINEER -CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ~ • ~ • . ~~~~~ ~ ~~ APPLIATION FOR ANNEXATION APPROVA rG~ ZONING OR REZONE ~)~ ~ ~°~ ~~~~-~~%~dr~ld MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION r'tLING INFORMATION I. GENERAL INFORMATION Hartford Subdivision (PROPOSED NAME OF SUBDIVISION) SW 1 4. SW 1/4 Section 35 T 4N R 1W B M Ada Countv (GENERAL LOCATION) -~ attached (LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ATTACH IF LENGTHY) Rav Wm. and Janet Wilder (208)888 2925 (OWNER(S) OF RECORD) (NAME) (TELEPHONE N0.) 3340 N. Ten Mile Road Meridian, Idaho 83642-5408 (ADDRESS) Viva Laxmi,.Development ~r~c., Ray Patel (208)336-0077 (APPLICANT) (NAME) (TELEPHONE N0.) .2526 Airport Way, Boise Idaho 83705 (ADDRESS) Hubble Engineering, Inc James C Merkle (208)322 8992 (ENGINEER, SURVEYOR OR PLANNER) (NAME) (TELEPHONE N0.) 9550 W. Bethel Court, Boise Idaho 8370 (ADDRESS) Citv of Meridian (JURISDICTION(S) REQUIRING APPROVAL) Residential (TYPE OF SUBDIVISION - RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL) +50 ACRES OF LAND IN CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP. (ACCEPTED BY:) (FEE) • • April 14, 1994 Ms. Shari Stiles City Planner City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: 20.06 Acre Annexation Request Northwest corner of Ustick and Ten Mile Roads Dear Ms. Stiles: ~~~~x~~ /r' k~,/k~d~+~ 1 5 ~~v~t I hereby grant my permission to Vijya Laxmi Development, Inc., to submit a request for the annexation of my property, located on the Northwest corner of Ustick and Ten Mile Roads, as described in the attached legal description. .~~~ ` r Ray Will' m Wilder Janet der ACKNOWLEDGEMENT State of _ ) ss County of ~.~. ) On this I ~`I~ day of _ ~~a~ 1994 personally appeared Ray William Wilder and Janet Wilder known or identified to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and who acknowledged to me that they executed the same. I~N Y~ 0~ y4 aA0e77777R@g~$C~ Notary Pub is for , ~®h, ~~'~ ~~~`~:~ ~''°~p~ t~ ~5., paa®ooo00' ~ e ~~ ~ ° ` ° ° Residing ~~(Q~ in ;r "~: ' "~ ® ~ %° ~~ ~° H ~~ ~ ;~ ~' -~~~'r. AMY s« ~~ My bond expires: ~'~ -R ~' M ~ y~ ® ~ ®`~ a -~- y ~ a ~U~L~~ ~ w e 0 a . ~ ry a~~.Pa j .~; ~ ~ ~ ,~ ;:~~~~~~ V Y gg dO~2[87478®~4 • April 14, 1994 Ms. Shari Stiles City Planner City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: 20.06 Acre Annexation Request Dear Ms. Stiles: • I, Tracey Persons, hereby promise to post a legal notice of public hearing for the 20.06 acre Annexation hearing (1) week prior to the Planning and Zoning hearing date. This will be done in conformance with item number 17 of the Annexation and Zoning Requirements of the City of Meridian. Tracey ACKNOWLEDGEMENT State of Idaho ) ss County of Ada ) On this ~¢~~day of w , 1994 personally appeared Tracey Persons, whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and who acknowledged to that she ..., ., My bond expires ~/z9~~9 ~- ®•~~io ~~w®a®®°° `L' 'r~~ O F 1~ ~°°°` • • "`'~ ~~' HOBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. 9 ~ 9550 Bethel Court ^ Boise, Idaho 83709 208/322-8992 ^ Fax 208/378-0329 do suRVEy°Q April 15, 1994 ~E~~~~.~ ~+~'~' t 5 f994 Project No. 94040 C1°i~'~' ~i~ i+~~~r.~itit~~ Ms. Shari Stiles City Planner City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Annexation and Zoning of 20.02 Acres Proposed Hartford Subdivision Dear Ms. Stiles: On behalf of Vijya Laxmi Development, Inc., we hereby request that the property described in the attached application and legal description be annexed into the City of Meridian. The present land use is pasture and farmland. The proposed land use for the entire property will be single family residential. The present zoning is R-T (Rural Transitional) in Ada County. The proposed zoning is R-4 in the City of Meridian which is consistent with the existing zoning tot he South. The property adjacent to this parcel on the East is zoned R-1 in Ada County. The property on the South is the proposed Candlelight Subdivision, which will contain single family residential lots. To the West is agricultural land zoned R-T in Ada County, and to the Southwest is the proposed Firelight Subdivision which will contain single family residential lots. Additionally, we are requesting approval for the proposed Hartford Subdivision preliminary plat located on 19.57 acres and containing 57 building lots designated for single-family development. This provides 3.2 dwelling units per acre, the R-4 zoning proposed for this annexation allows a maximum of 4 dwelling units per acre. The proposed annexation and Hartford Subdivision preliminary plat conform with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map as a single family residential subdivision. • Ms. Shari Stiles April 15, 1994 Page 2 • ....,s, :.;~ This subdivision will contain new sanitary sewer and domestic water mains which will be extended to serve this development. The streets are proposed as public streets and will conform with Ada County Highway District standards and Meridian City Ordinance. All sidewalks within the subdivision will be five feet in width. The square footage of the lots and the minimum square footage of the homes will conform with the requirements of the Meridian City Ordinance. No variances are being requested at this time. Thank you for your time and consideration. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, James C. Merkle, P.E. Attachments cc: Vijya Laxmi Development, Inc. 2526 Airport Way, Boise, Idaho 83705 JCM/mf/hartford.ltr ,~. r ,. £00 'd iii. • ~,~ ..:~a t•: ,~~x,:: ~k ,, •, •~ ;,~ ~ • . •;, ~ .~ ... F •;, IK',~ZT1E.5~t~~31~RFA1r,Tbeantdimiti6 ~' Pi'rthav6 itiereuntnr.:ttheirhand s and sea I g Lyle day and year brat abo~•e ~7'lt • ''` • aak;;~ s~crin, REdI.F.D A.r.D , xr.tv~xsn ix r>a~sxcsoi: " :~''~4`~`;~ ~•.. ' .... ~~•_ _:,• d ,... ..•• • ..-.. .•,,,• r L ••• ........ (5eai •;•~~-°-'.r~ C+~L!'G.~S~.., ~C//~.G.tia {~~I~:'r' ~SCaI~ .: ~.~. ~• •a:, ... ............_. .,....«.............w... ,~ ,., ,,:' C~unt~• of Alfa ~ • • 4n this ,_„ ~_ dny of ~~ in the year 19 60 , hclorc me ::3 ~:;,darsigned ., . a Notary 1}ubL'c in and .~,r c;irl ~rsi~:, la:r>:;unally,+.p~~ H. J. SPEN~R and CUt~I+I.A SPEt~tCER, ,~ti ~r:~, •.l :a~b_r.d and wife, :::;;;;n~~•;~ ~ -':~'~ . known to rse tc, b~; :Iic persona x•hoae name 8•~~ 8re •"•.~' • 6ubactibed to the within iastrvmmt, aad aCkyn-~;.•c}n.; to r.;c that ~ l~eY executed We ss~oe; ' •.; ._. ...... . ~. `~• y: is :, ~; ..~_ • • ~ , .:' Pti.,,• I1'11'I;'~l~,;S 1ti'~;(tFAN', I hat•Q herpuAlo eet•my rband~and affixed my official seat, the day and ~~rnr~in ILl= A; r; ;::ar. Eirst abavc written. .. .. , .:• • : •' Y .. • ...~......~ .~~_ .~- ..~.~r...~-~....._ • ~ Notary Public >For the SLale of Idaho, ~', . ' • Reaiding at Meridian , Idat:o. • .•Y. _•~1~ ~ ••~~ n . ~,~• ~.. I xr ~ 4 ~ ' • _. .~n •, ~ ah5r•, ~ ~ ~. .~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ,1 ~ ' 1 •~ II W .I~ ~ .•i d ~ Q• • ~ Fes- ~ 'i + 'C ~ •~ 's a ~ •,~, ;~ { ~ ,~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 1 ~~ ~ ' y a}~ • ~ ~,~ ~ bi£: £ti£ 80t ~'id,L :i ,~ 1 1 P ~ ~ ~ ! 1 ~Y~ r. Z,iQG I ~~~ ~,~I • O ~ 1 ~ `,~ a•' ~,~ r ~ ~ . ~ ~ a. i 1!` ., ~; ~ ~; ;.~,,,.r ~ ~ '~: f i ~ :• •a ~~ i ~ '` , . ~;. 1 `~ ~ i• . i ,~ '~' , $• ~ w iii d~~,~i .,;• . tom; H,L6N 3'i,LI,L d,LI~(1~~95 8b~Si i9n~166,SI-'~dW ,- ~~ au.:wit.u,sa?Y.t~ll ,_. .. , \:, f" ;/ ~1 ~ ~~ ' ~ ~\ ~ + , ' 1t ~', ` i, y ` 'W. T"CFiER, tV1th all i~ or in an}'trisif PPv • d prrtits tharoo attd rin tqu'•ty, of the • id F 1~'~ Ati'D T01~ LD purtrnance~, unto"thy parties of t'~e f the anlll pxrtie3 art. nt:l] Lh+~ir e 0 Cl;ll :1 th! ssm~ TH:E .:tDE.ti"CUft~. Dd~de lhle ~~'''• f ~~,~1 ' ~• ~lhiT<<.~~c In the yenr of uur J.or+1 onv thouanadyitt~ h a'r tl. ,1. ,Pi;tICER ~nd~'OOI~ .; ~;CLA,' h of ,County o[ "~~` d :4•' ... i-, j;,a part ie3 of the first past, xnd ]tAY. WM: ~„ . ER4an , . ,; ;'A'yr`.;:. "".~~ ~ hustaand and Wi;t'e,• : •,~'•: ~". .,, ~ ~y of ~'.~.rt,~Qr~.~i ,County o[ ~~ •Aa the part i65 of tltt secot7d part. ~. .~ brlon i is.5uea la Iaw . ro with the .":nel tha I rn:laeaalr of the fti • t141:nipg i 00 'd ~tiZT]hF.3SETFi, Thyt tic said part lea ~ of liras part, toe and in eo ''- ~' ,• . c pa tg o.» B . sitchtetl in ,County of ~ , A 1 I ~~~ • .~ ,~'h~~ '•~'' , ' ~Yhi~ •~auth if of the South~e9st Qua e ' ~ ~ , 'ruarter of ect:ipn •3$, Towr3stilip 4 Mo t ~, ~' ' ~~ ~•YoiS~ Merl an, Idaho. . ~ ~~,' .. ~_ ~~,,,'..',',~;~o~et::er h al]. water, w2ter right;; rights of y appurGenaat. tihareto or'~co '~ ~. TEtw {$1Q.Of)) attd other goon aad~ va ta~.vful money nt the United $tatea of Amariea, ': :~.; :. to f••~rt ies . of tJto tw.c. ~d part, the rtctf~6 uheieoil' ^nd st,ld, anti by these pres~ntra~ do ~i'aat. bang of tH second rt 3nd to heir hel d anal i~,y,,, I',~a,:R~l7 i Xty ;. ~ , .Yrtwc+eA ~ A • ' . 1 ~ ~ .~~~ .~~ oT Idah , . JA T :~fILt)e R, , stgt~ cf • ,f ,3L rte, ahp (- .,• , • orrtlon of r sum of e. __-- 1JOt_LARS. land paid t- the said granted,'~srgained v lhp Said Pon 3.ea rlcacriF.ed rein curate. a .arc nI 7•!ah~, to-tr~.t: i r of th 5outh'~+est h, ~n~~ 1 ~~1~ Gt, di.tchE ~ a-td rl3tc~! nnecte" therexit:t,. ,: L '. t '+ t . t • S~ 4 .` 5 .. ~. /' `'; ~ •~ ' ` ~~' ~~ ~~ , '~4 .~ a t sUtdulnr L tenea'eata: he ':a+ncn aa1 ..".nhur;r, :u-tr•a th.::cuuto ~s~nia6, the teTalon and rave i~~a-, r sla~c: :^d r_~a,nG3r~. :ants alt ~ttata, rfghL,;tltle bpd ittc at i:t anc td t c aa!d r.-p, ~,t;•, n...c~~U nn ii®g of,t~te,firat ass. . kll u+d sln~uln~ t15! t ot~e men sad anti d>: Ct~~~a t.:+a. to asks. G'~ q,e`~:ol~thapast,. to their a n:td arr,~~ fa-r~•rr f Part, ntid:~ie3nc~Ge'e, the a d p rnlaaa i, gtsl; i nnr] prZ~aaSlo the,Naoad port,'•_~hglt~vi;ra andsiNrs, u;; i ti:a:c,;id part •i ca v, and AgnLdtt'n1! nad ilyn parson'''$$$~a~td pcneaa +urn:•~,~ra-, L•.taft:-h; and•+~11,WARit,ArT ona ay'thaaPraa+cntiw fa !r DEFE~U. t£! tic i ~']3,L H1,6N bie •~coasiderati~ ' ; '~'F r •'th ero ereby ack wtedged• ha aetl, conve d confir~i fareser alt- i the folSou w • "'~ ~`~ RUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. ~9ti ~y 9550 Bethel Court ^ Boise, Idaho 83709 208/322-8992 ^ Fax 208/378.0329 Project No. 94040 April 7, 1994 TEN MILE-USTICK ANNEXATION BOUNDARY The South half of the SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 35, T.4N., R.1W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the corner common to Sections 2 and 3, T.3N., R.1 W., and Sections 34 and 35, T.4N., R.1 W., B.M., Thence North 00°53'34" East, 660.85 feet to the S-S1/64 corner common to said Sections 34 and 35; thence South 89°14'23" East, 1319.17 feet to the C-S-SWi/64 corner; thence South 00°40'05" West, 660.43 feet to the W1/16 corner common to said Sections 35 and 2; thence North 89°15'30" West, 1321.76 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 20.026 acres, more or less. Subject to rights-of-way for Ustick Road along the South boundary, and Ten Mile Road along the West boundary. Prepared by: RUBBLE ENG~VEERING, INC. s~ ~ ~ 'f' t7 q ~ ~~~~~ C F ~'~ C~ J~ ~ ~ S ~~ ~V DTP/mf/483.des D. Terry Peugh, P.L.S. • 1 REfJUEST FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PRELIMINARY PLAT AND/OR FINAL PLAT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PRELIMINARY PLAT TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSION: A request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerks possession no later than three days following the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at th e monthly meeting folloving the month the request vas made. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetin s r vid d g p o e the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:00 P M . ., Thursday folloving the Planning and Zoning Commission action. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Annexation and Subdivision, Hartford Snbdiviaion 2. General Location, _SW 1/4. SW 1/4. Section 35 T 4N R 1W B M Ada ounty 3. Owners of record, ~av wm. and Tanat Wi 1 APr Address, 3340 N. Ten Mile Rd. , Zip 83642 Telephone (208)888-2925 Meridian, Idaho 4. Applicant, Viiva Laxmi Devel. , Inc. Address, 2526 Airport Way, Boise, ID 8370 5. Engineer, James C. Merkle Firm Hubble En~ineerint~, Inc. Address 9550 W. Bethel Ct. , Boise ,Zip 83709 Telephone_ (208) 322-8992 6. Name and address to receive City billings: Name Applicant Address Telephone PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres 19._57 . 2. Number of lots 57 Buildable and 5 non-buildable 62 Total 3. Lots per acre .~~.::. . 4. Density per acre 3.17 ~ ~~;;;~~.~=~ .: ~.;::, S. Zoning Classification t s ) Existing R-T with proposed R-4 .. `'~ ~ -= . • ~:~ ' •,. ` ~ ' ~4 ~, ~ r 6. If the proposed subdivision is outside tT,e Meridian City Limits but within the jurisdictional mile, what is the existing zoning classification 7. Does the plat border a potential green belt _Nn b. Have recreational easements been provided for No 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City~_ Explain NA 10. Are there proposed dedications of common areas? Yes Explain Perimeter and entrace island will be landscaped. For future parks? No Explain NA 11. What school t s ) service the area Mar; dian , do you propose any agreements for future school sites No Explain~A__ 12. Other proposed amenities to the City X Water Supply X Fire Department Sanitary Sewer Other S - Explain 23. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial or combination) _ Residential 14. Type of Dwellingts) Single Family, Duplexes, Multiplexes, other 4i nol c F„r~ ,., 15. Proposed Development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot t s ), 8,000 Square Feet b. Minimum square footage of structure t s) PPr Ordina„ra c. Are garages provides for, Yes square footage 420 Sq. Ft. d. Are other coverings provided for No e. Landscaping has been provided for Yes, Describe Perimeter and entrance island•,~and covenants require landscaping for each building lot. ~: ,,, • • f. Trees will be provided for Yes Trees will be maintained Homeowners Association. g. Sprinkler systems are provided for No h. Are there multiple units No Type NA remarks NA i. Are there special set back requirements No Explain tvA j. Has off street parking been provided for No .Explain k. Value range of property 580.000 - S125.000 1. Type of financing for development~tandard m. Protective covenants rere submitted No . Date Future 16. Does the proposal land lock other property No Does it create Enclaves No STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be constructed to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions rill be determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks rill be five (5) feet in width. 2. Proposed use is 3n conformance rith the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 3. Development rill connect to City services. 9. Development rill comply rith City Ordinances. 5. Preliminary Plat rill include all appropriate easements. 6. Street names must not conflict rith City grid system. . ~~`:. (3) _.4~.a ~y~ a~.~ ,.} .~~, • •< ~` C IZ Q pry l~ Z W. F--~ ~I I; i~ IYU , ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ - 14 13 12 g 9 10 11 f 1 • 17 ~ ~ 1! 20 21 22 ?..'1 24 25 2Q 27 2B 20 15 _' ~~~.-------------------------- 1 2 5 8 7 8 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 7 -------- -- 8~a~i!' 4 t3 2 I 13 I I 12 11 1D 2 3 4 5 ,8~ 0 RI • ~• =:ADA PLANNING AS~rN. .. - . •' a x. 1 1 '• . ~- ~ • • APR 1 4 '199 4 ~~ 3 w PE98LESTOh ' ° ~ 11 9 ~' c ~CIIVI~I C.c~o~ l ~l l I~l,~' ~ ~ ~ ~ , .~ r,.1. ~ 0 ~ - ~ 9 ~~ i '~ .. it . • A ; Ix a ira i' '' E . ~ ~ ~ •~ N ~+' `. x 1 R T ~. A ~ b ~ 4 1 r ) 1 i 2 3 14 s - ~ O : 8 10 4 . . iM[ET/It11R iT 4 . ~ 4 ' = 1 ~• 20 *~ 3 • • • r • ~ . y 23 ~..: ,~ :4r ~ ~. •~ ,t 9 ~ ZO !1. ~~• 10 ,.~,. • . . ~r R/WRNINNIf7 ! _ ~ ~ .x= t/ t 11 13 µ y • f ~O 11 I= ~ q µ . ~ ~. .µ ~ ,, ~ Y ~ P R W Q , u ;~, ~ •' •. Mt' WMO[ Cl; . ~ rt rlnaTwtur on ' ze :~ ~~ .. •~•~i RUBBLE ENGI EERING INC. ~ ~ 9550 Bethel Court • Boise, Idaho 83709 208/322.892 • Fax 20~3~g.0329 \9ti Q`' Project No. 94040 HARTFORD SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY April 14, 1994 A portion of the South half of the SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 35, T.4N., R.1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the corner common to Sections-2 and 3, T.3N., R.1 W., and Sections 34 and 35, T.4N., R.1 W., B.M., thence North 00°53'34" East, 347.44 feet along the West boundary of said Section 35 to a point; thence South 80°11'00" East, 183.85 feet to a point; thence North 00°53'34" East, 123.21 feet to a point; thence North 89°14'23" West, 181.63 feet to a point on the West boundary of said Section 35; thence along said West boundary North 00°53'34" East, 219.14 feet to the S-S1/64 corner; thence South 89°14'23" East, 1319.17 feet to the C-S-SWi/64 corner; thence South 00°40'05" West, 660.43 feet to the W1/16 corner common to said Sections 35 and 2; thence North 89°15'30" West, 1321.76 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 19.57 acres, more or less. Subject to rights-of-way for Ustick Road along the South boundary, and Ten Mile Road along the West boundary. Prepared by: NUBBLE E,D~! DTP/mf/483A.des D. Terry Peugh, P.L.S. ti y ~ ~ ~~ 3i i E y p y !i E i 1 i 'y !d ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~5 ~i!= ~~ ~~~~~~i~~i~f 1~ r e~~ f !~~ ~ I~i "~'~ ° •~~ ~ m Z r ~ {vyy,~ ~ !~~ N 3 V z~a a~~ o J ~. W Z _0 ~ ~_ Q ~_ J ~ a Q] ~ ~ ~ ~a oz ~~ O ~ ~ W ~ ~ a a. 2 ~a~ ~~~ v, V ~+ ti m ~ ~i ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ _"~ y~ ~~~~~ 0 M~ ~ !~ ~~ ~ i ~; ~ i! Iii! ~+ r r • • r • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 16.1994 APPLICANT: VIJYA LAXMI DEVELOPMENT AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 17 REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING• REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HARTFORD SUBDMSION AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS FINDINGS OF FACT ANDCONCLUSIONS OF LAW( ~, I L "REVIEWED" ~~ ` ]~O ~~ SEE ATTACHED COM E TS ~ J ~ J .~ ,~ SEE ATTACHED COMMEpT C~' 11, - al/~ IN ~j ~ C~ I ~ a. SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ~y SEE ATTACHED COMMENT SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICEL.GASS,CityTreasurer CITY OF MERIDIAN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERTD ICORRE GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer . WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. sHAwcROFr, waste water supt. 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Planner 8 Zoning Administrator W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-4433 ~ FAX (?A8) 887-4813 Chairman ~ Planning & zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor MEMORANDUM May 25, 1994 To: Mayor, City Council, Planning & Zoning From: Gary D. Smith, PE • RE: HARTFORD SUBDIVISION I have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments for your information and or use as conditions of the applicant during the hearing process: This pazcel is adjacent to existing city limit boundaries created by the annexation of Candlelight Subdivision. The annexation description states, "subject to rights of way for Ustick Road along the south boundary and Ten Mile Road along the west boundary." What significance does this statement have? 2. Are the chord dimensions of Lots 6, 7, 8 -Block 2 40 feet or is the 40 feet shown for the curve? 3. Include the lot and existing house as a part of the subdivision. Provide a continuation of street improvements across the frontage of this lot. 4. What is the location of Five Mile Creek with respect to this projects north boundary? Who owns the property between Five Mile Creek and this project? 5. Can an above creek crossing be made to connect sanitary sewer to the existing trunk? 6. What will be the status of the irrigation ditch crossing this parcel? 7. Submit a vicinity map that shows land use. activity for 1/2 mile each way from this subdivision. 8. Show a referenced benchmark for the contour lines. 9. Submit proposed restrictive covenants. 10. Establish the highest seasonal groundwater elevation. 11. The City of Meridian wastewater treatment plant is located 1/4 mile (1320 feet) west of this proposed subdivision. The treatment plant has been in operation since 1979 and our plans are to continue treatment of human and industriaU commercial wastes. Obviously there is some odor generated in the sewage treatment process and- whether or not this is an objectionable odor is relative to what odors a person is used to. We have open sludge drying beds and occasionally we will lose the water seal in the floating cover(s) of the digester(s) or the digester gas burner may lose its flame which will cause some digester gas to be discharged to the atmosphere. If a northwesterly wind is blowing, and a disruption occurs in the digester process, this subdivision could experience the odor of digester gas which can be objectionable. This odor escape is an exception rather than the rule, but it can and has occurred. The treatment plant has been there for 15 years. HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAXYERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner & Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman -Planning & Zoning GRANT P. KINGSFORD MEMORANDUM Mayor TO: Planning &~ g ~c~on, Mayor and Council 1~ £S FROM: Shan L. Stiles, Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: May 26, 1994 SUBJECT: Annexation and Zoning with a Preliminary Plat for Hartford Subdivision Request for annexation and zoning of R-4 for 62 lots (57 buildable) on 19.57 acres generally complies with the Comprehensive Plan and minimum requirements of the Zoning and Development Ordinance. The following exceptions are noted: 1. Block 2 is over 1,000 feet long; provide a stub street to the north. 2. Can't the existing house be included in the annexation? Roadway improvements (sidewalk) will still be required. 3. Add note that direct lot access to Ten Mile Road and Ustick Road is prohibited. 4. Lot 31, Block 2, must provide link to Five Mile Creek proposed bike path and so state use in the notes. Contact John Anderson at Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District for necessary license agreement/land use application. The Bureau of Reclamation has a 140' (70' of centerline) easement on this stretch of Five Mile Creek. It appears the northeast corner of this property adjoins this easement. 5. This site is directly southeast of the City's wastewater treatment plant. Winds prevailing from the northwest may inflict negative impacts on property owners. All effects of adjacent agricultural and other uses will not be accepted by the City of Meridian as cause for complaint. 6. Include names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner(s) and developer on the plat. 6. Submit proposed covenants for review and approval prior to final plat submittal. 7. Include designer's initials on all plats, both preliminary and fmal. 8. Submit vicinity map showing relationship of proposed plat to surrounding area (1/2 mile minimum distance from exterior boundaries, scale optional). • Planning & Zoning Commission, Mayor and Council May 26, 1994 Page Two 9. Show minimum house size (>_ 1,400 s.f.) as note on final plat and in covenants. 10. Development agreement is required as a condition of annexation. ~~ • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public VI/orks/Building Department (208) 887-221 ! GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAXYERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner & Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman -Planning & Zoning TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PRO,iECT'a WITH THE CIT'1' OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning &~ Zoning Commission, may we have your answer by: May 24. 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 5/3/94 HEARING DA"CE: 5/31/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning with a Preliminary Plat for Hartford Subdivision BY: Viiya Laxmi Development and Hubble Engineering LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PRO.fECT: North of Ustick Road, East of Ten Mile Road JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C ^WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES .. ~~ OTHER: '~ YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: _ A CEIVED A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN MAY - 9 1994 CITY OF MEKiD1AN HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Cterk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887.4813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES P$la~nn/g ng Administrator ~~+~E(y HNSON Chairman ~ Planning & Zoning g MAY 1 2 199y4~g TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CLTY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning 8~ Zoning Commission, may we have your answer by: M ay 24, 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 5/3/94 HEARING DATE: 5/31/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning -with a Preliminary Plat for Hartford Subdivision BY: Viiva Laxmi Development and Hubble Engineering LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Ustick Road, East of Ten Mile Road JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES ~; / )` ~ i/ OTHER: / ''77 YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ~w~~ A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN ~pR 6XCE~! 2 Fyn Q ~~ MAY - 9 ~3~~ C1~'t'Y OF M1E~tBUTAP~ SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Bob L. Haley DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT Dan Mabe, Finance & Administration DIRECTORS Sheryl Belknap, Elementary Jim Carberry, Secondary Christine Donnell, Personnel Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911 MERIDIANSTREET MERIDIAN,IDAH083642 PHONE(208)888~701 May 5, 1994 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Hartford Subdivision Dear Councilmen: I have reviewed the application for Hartford Subdivision and find that it includes approximately 57 homes at the median value of $100,000. We also find that this subdivision is located in census tract 103.10 and in the attendance zone for Linder Elementary, Meridian Middle School and Meridian High School. Using the above information we can predict that these homes, when completed, will house 20 elementary aged children, 17 middle school aged children, and 20 senior high aged students. At the present time Linder Elementary is at 137 of capacity, Meridian Middle School is at 129 of capacity and Meridian High School is at 116$ of capacity. The Meridian School District is not opposed to growth in our district, however this subdivision will cause increased over- crowding in all three schools. There is little opportunity to shift attendance boundaries since the surrounding schools are also well over capacity. Before we could support this subdivision, we would need land dedicated to the district or at least made available at a minimum price for a school site in this area. The site would need water and sewer service available. In addition we would need to pass another bond issue for the construction of schools. The cost per student for newly constructed schools, excluding site purchase price and offsite improvements, exceeds $5,000 per elementary student and $10,000 per middle or high school student. • • We are in a difficult position and need your help in dealing with the impact of growth on schools. Sincerely, ~~ ~~~~ Dan Mabe Deputy Superintendent DM:gr ,: x /7 ~ • G-~-~,' RECEIVED MAY 3 1 1994 CITY OF IWtRiDIAN GLENN J. RHODES, President SHERRY R. HUBER, Vice President JAMES E. BRUCE, Secretary TO: Vijya Laxmi Development, Inc. 2526 Airport Way Boise ID 83705 FROM: Larry Sale, S p vi'~o,~/ Developm " + ; ~~, SUBJECT: HARTFORD SUBDIVI IO - PRELIMINARY PLAT May 25, 1994 On May 25, 1994, the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District (hereafter called "District") took action on the Preliminary Plat as stated on the attached staff report. In order that the Final Plat may be considered by the District for acceptance, the Developer shall cause the following applicable standard conditions to be satisfied prior to District certification and endorsement: 1. Drainage plans shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. 2. If public street improvements are required: Prior to any construction within the existing or proposed public right-of- way, the following shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District: a. Three complete sets of detailed street construction drawings prepared by an Idaho Registered Professional Engineer, together with payment of plan review fee. b. Execute an Inspection Agreement between the Developer and the District together with initial payment deposit for inspection and/or testing services. c. Complete all street improvements to the satisfaction of the District, or execute Surety Agreement between the Developer and the District to guarantee the completion of construction of all street improvements. ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 May 25, 1994 Page 2 ~? 3. Furnish copy of Final Plat showing street names as approved by the Local Government Agency having such authority together with payment of fee charged for the manufacturing and installation of all street signs, as required. 4. If Public Rights-of-Way Trust Fund deposit is required, make deposit to the District in the form of cash or cashier's check for the amount specified by the District. 5. Furnish easements, agreements, and all other datum or documents as required by the District. 6. Furnish Final Plat drawings for District acceptance, certifications, and endorsement. The final plat must contain the signed endorsement of the Owner's and Land Surveyor's certification. 7. Approval of the plat is valid for one year. An extension of one year will be considered by the Commission if requested within 15-days prior to the expiration date. Please contact me at 345-7680, should you have any questions. LS cc: Development Services Chron Hubble Engineering • ccnc GLENN J. RHODES, President SHERRY R. HUBER, Vice President JAMES E. BRUCE, Secretary TO: ACRD Commission INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE HARTFORD/DSTECH 5-25-94 DATE: May 23, 1994 FROM: SUBJECT: Development Services PRELIMINARY PLAT - HARTFORD SUBDIVISION (Developer - Vijya Laxmi Development, inc., 2526 Airport Way, Boise, ID 83705) (Engineer/Surveyor - Hubble Engineering, inc., James Merkle 9550 W. Bethel Court, Boise, ID 83709) FACTS & FINDINGS: 1. Hartford is a 19.6-acre, 57-lot, single family residential subdivision located on the northeast corner of Ustick and Ten Mile. There are 2880-feet of new public streets planned. This application includes an annexation to Meridian and a zone change from R-T to R-4. 2. GENERAL INFORMATION: LEAD AGENCY - Meridian ACRES - 19.6 FEET OF NEW PUBLIC STREETS - 2880 LOTS - 57 EXISTING ZONING - RT (R-4 requested) ESTIMATED VEHICLE TRIPS PER DAY - 570 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE - 256 L.F. OF FRONTAGE ON Ustick - 1322-feet MOST RECENT TRAFFIC COUNTS - Date 10/8/92 Volume 664 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP DESIGNATION - Minor Aricerial ADA COUNTY RIDGE-TO-RIVERS PATHWAY PLAN - Lane EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY - 50-feet REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY - 90-feet (45-feet from centerline) Ustick Road is improved with 25-feet of paving. L.F. OF FRONTAGE ON Ten Mile - 566-feet MOST RECENT TRAFFIC COUNTS - N/A FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP DESIGNATION - Local ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 PRELIMINARY PLA'Ii HARTFORD SUBDIVISION . May 23, 1994 Page 2 ADA COUNTY RIDGE-TO-RIVERS PATHWAY PLAN - Route EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY - 50-feet REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY - 90-feet (45-feet from centerline) Ten Mile is improved with 24-feet of paving. IMPACT FEE BENEFIT ZONE - West Ada IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - 1Vear Rural 3. Ustick Road is a section line road classified as a minor arte- rial with bike lane designation from the Ridge to Rivers Path- way Plan; therefore 90-feet of right-of-way is required. 4. The ACRD Capital Improvement Plan currently indicates that Ustick Road is not approved for use of Road Impact Fee funds to increase its capacity; however this designation may change when a CIP update (currently underway) is complete and takes Meridian's newly adapted Comprehensive Plan and rate of growth into account. If the developer wishes to be paid for the additional right-of-way, he/she must submit an application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACRD Ordinance #188. 5. Ten Mile Road is a section line road in an impact area, there- fore the District requires 90-feet of right-of-~.aay. 6. The ACRD Capital Improvement Plan currently indicates that Ten Mile is not approved for use of Road Impact Fee funds to in- crease its capacity; however this designation may change when a CIP update (currently underway) is complete and takes into account Meridian's newly adapted ComFrehensive Plan and rate of growth into account. If the developer wishes to be paid for the additional right-of-way, he/she must submit an applica- tion to the impact fee administrator prior to ;creaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHJ Ordinance #188. 7. The existing dwelling on Ten Mile is considered by staff to be an outparcel, therefore improvements and right-of-way will be required to extend along this parcel abutting Ten Mile. 8. Staff recommends a stub street to the west on F~ilcier Drive as shown in the site plan. This will accommodate the planned sewer route. 9. This application is scheduled for public hearing by the Meridi- an Planning & Zoning Commission on May 31, 1994. SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: 1. Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Ustick Road abutting parcel (20 additional feet). The owner will be PRELIMINARY PLA~ HARTFORD SUBDIVISION • May 23, 1994 Page 3 compensated for this additional right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone. 2. Provide pavement widening on Ustick Road for three 12-foot traffic lanes with a 5-foot paved shoulder. Coordinate with District Traffic Services staff. 3. Construct 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Ustick Road abutting parcel adjacent to the new right-of-way line. 4. Direct lot or parcel access to Ustick Hoad is prohibited, in compliance with District policy. Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. 5. Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Ten Mile Road abutting parcel and outparcel (20 additional feet). The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone. 6. Provide pavement widening on Ten Mile for three 12-toot traffic lanes with 5-foot pa~~ed shoulders. Coordinate with District Traffic Services staff. 7. Construct 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Ten Mile Road (including outparcel) abutting parcel adjacent to the new right-of-way line. 8. Direct lot or parcel access to ^~'en Miie Road is prohibited, in compliance with District policy. Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. 9. Align the proposed entrance to the subdivision on Ustick Road (Hartford Avenue) with the entrance to the proposed Candle- light Subdivision to the south. STANDARD REQUIREMENTS: 1. Street and drainage improvements requirE:d in t're pulliic right- of-way shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and policies. 2. Dedicated streets and drainage systems shall :oe designed and constructed in conformance with District stand,~~~ds and poli- cies. 3. Specifications, land surveys, reports, plats, c':rawir_gs, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACRD shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54-1215. PRELIMINARY PLA~ May 23, 1994 Page 4 HARTFORD SliBDIVISIJN 4. Provide written approval from: the appropriate irriga- tion/drainage district authorizi:zg storm runoff into their system. 5. Locate obstructions (utility faciiitiFS, irrigaticn and drain- age appurtenances, etc.) outside of she proposed street im- provements. Authorization for relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. 6. Continue existing irrigation and ~3rainage systems across par- cel. 7. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District for review and appropriate action.. 8. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and appropriate action by ACHD. The proposed drainage system shall conform to the requirements of ~4erid~an and shall retain all storm water on-site. Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the public right-of-way or in a drainage easement set aside specif- ically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, .~r other valuable amenities placed i.~ said ~=asement. Drainage easements and their use restrictions °hall b~ noted on the plat. 9. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for review ar3 appropriate action by ACHD. 10. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot property lines when the driveways are not being jhared with the adjacent property. 11. Developer shall provide the District -.pith a cope cf the record- ed plat prior to the installation of_ street name signs. Street signs will not be ordered until all fees have been paid and a copy of the recorded plat has been provided to ACHD staff. The copy of the recorded plat shalt show the recording information as inscribed by the DepLty County Recorder. 12. Install a stop sign on every uns~gnal.ized approach of a project street to an intersection involvin~; a cc.llector or arterial as the cross-street. mhe ;estop sign shall be in- stalled when the project street is first accessible to the motoring public. 13. Aright-of-way permit must be obtained from ACHD for all street and utility construction within the public right-of- way. Contact Construction Services a~~ ~4~-'~6ni (with zoning file number) for details. PRELIMINARY PLAT• HARTFORD SUBi~IVISION May 23, 1994 Page 5 14. A request for modification, variance or waiver or any require- ment or policy outlinEd herein shall ae made, in writing, to the Manager of Engineering Services within 15 calendar days of the original Commission action. Tne request shall include a statement explaining why such a requirement would result in substantial hardship or inequity. Should you have any questions cr ~~omments, please contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. STAFF SUBMITTING: Larry Sale GATE OF COMMIS ~~ON APPRO~il1~%.: MAY 2 5 1994 ~ • J 3 • i '` Z w. ~~ _~ ~; , a~ ~~~ v - J 9 '~ g ,10 11.'I ~9~ RT .\ ~, - /• ~ / 1 2' ~5 8;, 7 8 ,.~18 •15~ ,; 14 13 12 11 10 9 EtT m I' 13 . I 12 11 R I . . us _e~ -~~d- , K - ...-. AOA PLANNIN G ASSN. ~ 4 3 2 l :r 1 • • . ~~o pcs~.c~, ~- s w. . PE88LESror {:. _ " : APR ~ 4 194 ~;t~0(.(~ I I G~ I~t~fi-~~i I~f VI~~~~ • g : II ,~d ~ , 6 7 ~ ,,. - - : Fl O L.: t~•.. _ ~ - ~ It - 10. W 12 13 E ' • ': - M s ' • 2 ~ • ': } ; . . a ~ . 2 1 14 _ b 10 . W 4 . O K i~•ET•ItIM ST. 4 13 4 '' = 1. ; 24 I6' :8 •'~ 3 20 - ~:~ ~~` `• ~ ~ JOUST ST. .r:; ~ Ig . w• r ~ . . •~ 1 ~ -~ ~ • • , ! • N J 22 ,• ` s • ~ ~I W , ~ s L~~ • •21 ~ry ~ eS ~i •! • ' ~ • • = 4 • ~ • Z 20 ~ YI. 10 . ~~ . ' •~ r.~lrooluea z ~ j •Q YZ • ~M tl 18. -~ Ig ; • ~o u K r w ~, 14. ~ 1• • Ir ' - a - ~ • a a, , 1 ~~ ~ `r n 1• It• .'D >a Zs u K Q xs ~ _ ~ _. ` •~ ~, • ". ,. •'-. MC'' YIR/-0! Ct , . w. ~I[LO•TIKAM OIt: ' 2s >t• •~•;1. • s ~q;~dol~~g~~~~~i~~ ~~36~:~0~1~~o3~~~i ~i ~ ~`" i ~'!~ _ ~9~ ~ ° e~ Z ~~s F m Z ~ ~ ~ .~ ~~ N3U Z C Q _ O I ~ ~ Q I~~~ ~o ~ w Z O~ (n Q J ~a mr ~ ~ tl) Q ~ Z ~ ~ O J ~ W ~ ~ Qa ~~ 1 p R ~ ` ~ ~~; ~~ ;~ ~ ~~ , I ~; ~ i! a~i !' ~• M ~ • • • a A ~a~ ~~~ ~~ j~ ~~ ,JU1 Y 14,1994 ~~nridlsr, n,;~nn:n~ q Zan1n~ ~~ommi_Sinr: ~~3 L~J:.'t 1~~~J~t+J :~tt'rt3[ I~f-:t idiesi, i~~o~i4 ~~ jG~t. Re: p.~tie~raa:~ grid Hertfard yrapa;ed :,ut;di vi.ians peer r~ammidrlQ~zers: ~~~~ Y ~~ J U ~. ~ $ 19~~t CITY Og N3ERIDyAN 'Tp $,fTP11!7; '$PitYl great lnterBSt, the COmffi1S~1on mestlrt~s ~/h8n the above mentlOriP~l ;:ubdivisir~ris ere an tYle e~enda, as we own the property in-between these twr propased ~~~tdivisians. ~Je obtained a copy of the Preliminary Plat Application far Ra~aable~vaod filed by Teaiey'~ Land cur*~e3nn~, dated April 13, i'~94 an ~thich it details the "4.19 acre site pre~eritly contains a sin~ip-family dwelling and three ~3y detached accessary buiidin~s..." As I'm sure your records reflect 1~?l now, the property actually contains nothing but elf'ali~„ but the parcel to the Past of this: o~cme~llby the Tully family, would more accurately fit the applicant's description. "~7r cttcridcd isle first r~eetiri~ on I~Iay 31,1994. I+~r. Ted Hutchinsar~ told the crmmissian that hE ;rauid be talYing to the surrotsnding property owners concerning serer lines. It wa- sit this rueetin~ ire z4ct the dcvelaper, I~Ir. T~2~ri Hardee, and he asked if ~ro ~r~auid be willing to let them ~~4~1$ acrOS our r rapersy Frith ^e~rer lines. ~e said one vnauid like to kna~~r the detail: before ~~ ~'ditld a~reso ra ~~;~rhing. Hestin~; ;tot heard *ram er<';ndn~e b-~ the Wert creek, '.r8 pieced a f¢~r cells tC+ Teelps~'" Les7~~! altr'~la~lin~' t0 in~uirp vrhere the prapgsed line: might bp, and if ?gs'ijlthlrig '6lfJ1l~~ ~'YF t'e~Jlilr$c ~f 135. '~~$ 1PZT Qur home $tl~ Offi~CB phr~ne tlumbPrs ~1th the se^.reT$rsT. $~ Ivir. Hutchinson at'id I~ir. Teeley were riot available to speak witYl ays. I+Tot being able to attend the June 1 ~ meeting, ;,~ obtained a copy of the minutes from that rfieeting. I~~Ir. smith made mention lri the minutes that it might be necessary to cr0"~ our f~raFprt-~ Stith the seer line. '~Te were in attendance at the July 12 meetin„ and the cammis.>ion a.*Yed Ivlr. Hutchinson if he had talY.ed with us, and I~Ir. Hutchinson'a reply wa£ ~amething to the effect of "I believe bJir. Schafer eves at the last meeting". ale tY~ou~Ylt that by this time the deveioger arould have provided us with details es to whore ttie proposed sewer lines might te, ~Yiat kind of easement would be necessary, grid to ~riYat effect this would Piave on our property. The only information we have is eWhat ~,rre have learned b y atter~dir~g the Pierining ~: Zanirig meetings. Are vnc to aasuflae that the laca~tian at the sewer • • iir~es 'rte.: feast ciet~er~iri~~ ~i~ ~3Ues tilt invrive Our pra~erty in eriy ~rav"r ~w'E ~/iii ~e 4ux of ro ~rri f'r~~,fft Jul ~ 16 tYiroh bugust 1, end Dili ~e iooYing ~or;~rard to the ne t meeting. ~is2 verei , S~ ~ . John TJ. ~~;hel'er Ta~u-a~ra L. SchsSer ~~~Gu'~. Ust1Ci's ~.021~ Ir1.~lyjcyyrbbi77,dQpi~66ri, Idaho 8'64 ~~;: rlls. ~hsri tiles. City Pleriner GLENN J. RHODES, President SHERRY R. HUBER, Vice President JAMES E. BRUCE, Secretary TO: VIJYA LAXMI DEVELOPMENT INC 2526 AIRPORT WAY BOISE ID 83705 FROM: Larry Sale, Sup v s Developme Se CITY (~~ I~~C~IDIAT~ June 15, 1994 SUBJECT: HARTFORD SUBDIVISION (REVISED)- PRELIMINARY PLAT On June 15, 1994, the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District (hereafter called "District") took action on the Preliminary Plat as stated on the attached staff report. In order that the Final Plat may be considered by the District for acceptance, the Developer shall cause the following applicable standard conditions to be satisfied prior to District certification and endorsement: 1. Drainage plans shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. 2. If public street improvements are required: Prior to any construction within the existing or proposed public right-of- way, the following shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District: a. Three complete sets of detailed street construction drawings prepared by an Idaho Registered Professional Engineer, together with payment of plan review fee. b. Execute an Inspection Agreement between the Developer and the District together with initial payment deposit for inspection and/or testing services. c. Complete all street improvements to the satisfaction of the District, or execute Surety Agreement between the Developer and the District to guarantee the completion of construction of all street improvements. ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 June 15, 1994 Page 2 3. Furnish copy of Final Plat showing street names as approved by the Local Government Agency having such authority together with payment of fee charged for the manufacturing and installation of all street signs, as required. 4. If Public Rights-of-Way Trust Fund deposit is required, make deposit to the District in the form of cash or cashier's check for the amount specified by the District. 5. Furnish easements, agreements, and all other datum or documents as required by the District. 6. Furnish Final Plat drawings for District acceptance, certifications, and endorsement. The final plat must contain the signed endorsement of the Owner's and Land Surveyor's certification. 7. Approval of the plat is valid for one year. An extension of one year will be considered by the Commission if requested within 15-days prior to the expiration date. Please contact me at 345-7680, should you have any questions. LS cc: Development Services Chron HUBBLE ENGINEERING MERIDIAN CITY HALL ~ I I GLENN J RHODES, President SHERRY R. HUBER, Vice President JAMES E. BRUCE, Secretary T0: ACHD Commission INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE HARTFORD/DSTECH 5-25-94 DATE: June 13, 1994 FROM: SUBJECT: Development Services PRELIMINARY PLAT - HARTFORD SUBDIVISION (Revised) (Developer - Vijya Laxmi Development, Inc., 2526 Airport Way, Boise, ID 83705) (Engineer/Surveyor - Hubble Engineering, Inc., James Merkle, P.E., 9550 W. Bethel Court, Boise, ID 83709) FACTS & FINDINGS: 1. Hartford is a 19.6-acre, 57-lot, single family residential subdivision located on the northeast corner of Ustick and Ten Mile. There are 2880-feet of new public streets planned. This application includes an annexation to Meridian and a zone change from R-T to R-4. The Commission reviewed and approved Hartford June 8, 1994. This revision is to correct a mistake with regard to the stub street on Wilder Drive. The stub street on Wilder should be extended to the east instead of west as originally written. Also the City of Meridian has required the developer to in- clude the outparcel on Ten Mile with the plat, therefore staff recommends that the lot access restrictions on Ten Mile be waived for the existing dwelling. 2. GENERAL INFORMATION: LEAD AGENCY - Meridian ACRES - 19.6 FEET OF NEW PUBLIC STREETS - 2880 LOTS - 57 EXISTING ZONING - RT (R-4 requested) ESTIMATED VEHICLE TRIPS PER DAY - 570 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE - 256 ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 PRELIMINARY PLAT June 10, 1994 Page 2 HARTFORD SUBDIVISION • L.F. OF FRONTAGE ON Ustick - 1322-feet MOST RECENT TRAFFIC COUNTS - Date 10/8/92 Volume 664 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP DESIGNATION - Minor Arterial ADA COUNTY RIDGE-TO-RIVERS PATHWAY PLAN - Lane EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY - 50-feet REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY - 90-feet (45-feet from centerline) Ustick Road is improved with 25-feet of p aving. L.F. OF FRONTAGE ON Ten Mile - 566-feet MOST RECENT TRAFFIC COUNTS - N/A FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP DESIGNATION - Local ADA COUNTY RIDGE-TO-RIVERS PATHWAY PLAN - Route EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY - 50-feet REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY - 90-feet (45-feet from centerline) Ten Mile is improved with 24-feet of paving. IMPACT FEE BENEFIT ZONE - West Ada IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - Near Rural 3. Ustick Road is a section line road classified as a minor arte- rial with bike lane designation from the Ridge to Rivers Path- way Plan; therefore 90-feet of right-of-way is required. 4. The ACRD Capital Improvement Plan currently indicates that Ustick Road is not approved for use of Road Impact Fee funds to increase its capacity; however this designation may change when a CIP update (currently underway) is complete and takes Meridian's newly adapted Comprehensive Plan and rate of growth into account. If the developer wishes to be paid for the additional right-of-way, he/she must submit an application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACRD Ordinance #188. 5. Ten Mile Road is a section line road in an impact area, there- fore the District requires 90-feet of right-of-way. 6. The ACRD Capital Improvement Plan currently indicates that Ten Mile is not approved for use of Road Impact Fee funds to in- crease its capacity; however this designation may change when a CIP update (currently underway) is complete and takes into account Meridian's newly adapted Comprehensive Plan and rate of growth into account. If the developer wishes to be paid for the additional right-of-way, he/she must submit an applica- tion to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACHD Ordinance #188. 7. The existing dwelling on Ten Mile is considered by staff to be an outparcel, therefore improvements and right-of-way will be required to extend along this parcel abutting Ten Mile. The City of Meridian is requiring the outparcel to be included in PRELIMINARY PLAT HARTFORD SUBDIVISION • June 10, 1994 Page 3 the plat, therefore staff recommends that the lot access re- strictions on Ten Mile be waived for the existing dwelling. 8. Staff recommends a stub street to the east on Wilder Drive as shown in the site plan. This will accommodate the planned sewer route. 9. This application is scheduled for public hearing by the Meridi- an Planning & Zoning Commission on May 31, 1994. SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: 1. Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Ustick Road abutting parcel (20 additional feet). The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone. 2. Provide pavement widening on Ustick Road for three 12-foot traffic lanes with a 5-foot paved shoulder. Coordinate with District Traffic Services staff. 3. Construct 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Ustick Road abutting parcel adjacent to the new right-of-way line. 4. Direct lot or parcel access to Ustick Road is prohibited, in compliance with District policy. Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. 5. Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Ten Mile Road abutting parcel and outparcel (20 additional feet). The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone. 6. Provide pavement widening on Ten Mile for three 12-foot traffic lanes with 5-foot paved shoulders. Coordinate with District Traffic Services staff. 7. Construct 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Ten Mile Road (including outparcel) abutting. parcel adjacent to the new right-of-way line. 8. Direct lot or parcel access to Ten Mile Road is prohibited (with the exception of the existing dwelling, if it is includ- ed on the plat), in compliance with District policy. Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. PRELIMINARY PLA~ HARTFORD SUBDIVISION • June 10, 1994 Page 4 9. Construct the stub street to the east on the proposed Wilder Drive as shown on the preliminary plat. 10. Align the proposed entrance to the subdivision on Ustick Road (Hartford Avenue) with the entrance to the proposed Candle- light Subdivision to the south. STANDARD REQUIREMENTS: 1. Street and drainage improvements required in the public right- of-way shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and policies. 2. Dedicated streets and drainage systems shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and poli- cies. 3. Specifications, land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACRD shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54-1215. 4. Provide written approval from the "appropriate irriga- tion/drainage district authorizing storm runoff into their system. 5. Locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drain- age appurtenances, etc.) outside of the proposed street im- provements. Authorization for relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. 6. Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across par- cel. 7. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District for review and appropriate action. 8. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and appropriate action by ACHD. The proposed drainage system shall conform to the requirements of Meridian and shall retain all storm water on-site. Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the public right-of-way or in a drainage easement set aside specif- ically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, or other valuable amenities placed in said easement. Drainage easements and their use restrictions shall be noted on the plat. PRELIMINARY PLAT• June 10, 1994 Page 5 HARTFORD SUBDIVISION • 9. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for review and appropriate action by ACHD. 10. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot property lines when the driveways are not being shared with the adjacent property. 11. Developer shall provide the District with a copy of the record- ed plat prior to the installation of street name signs. Street signs will not be ordered until all fees have been paid and a copy of the recorded plat has been provided to ACHD staff. The copy of the recorded plat shall show the recording information as inscribed by the Deputy County Recorder. 12. Install a stop sign on every unsignalized approach of a project street to an intersection involving a collector or arterial as the cross-street. The stop sign shall be in- stalled when the project street is first accessible to the motoring public. 13. A right-of-way permit must be obtained from ACRD for all street and utility construction within the public right-of- way. Contact Construction Services at 345-7667 (with zoning file number) for details. 14. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any require- ment or policy outlined herein shall be made, in writing, to the Manager of Engineering Services within 15 calendar days of the original Commission action. The request shall include a statement explaining why such a requirement would result in substantial hardship or inequity. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. STAFF SUBMITTING: DATE OF COMMISSION APPROVAL: Larry Sale ~ i~1~ 1 5 ,_ , lli+ • J 3 N _ ~:. Z W; i-- -.~ i~ a~ - ~~~O~QS ~~ ~r~llgwt ~ i I RT ~' it iI i I '~ t~ 14 13 ~12 ,- .r` 9 ~ 8 ,10 11 . • n v m 21 24 2S~ 7 ~ 2~ 30 32 ~ Z%~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I-; =T-- ~ - --- ---- ---T=--- ~ / 1 2' •S 8; 7 8 ,_~18 ~15. ,; 14 . 13 12 11 10 9 ~ 13 I ~ 12 ~~ R r-------------------- / 10 • BdC~i!' 4 !~ l1 2•~ • 3 4 •5 ~~, 8 ~ • ' K ..,; , ,cam ,~, ~ r :.~.-r._t...c. :.« ~ ~ ~. ,. ~~. ~ :. +i . ' '~ ~ ADA PLANNIN G ASSN. 4 3 2 ;:~ I l = :" - s- ~~'o p~s~. . s w. P®e~esTOr ,~::. _ - APR ~ 4 , '1 94 G~~t-f-~~Ic~NI~~~~ ~ ~.a-t~0(.(~.II 0 : II 9 tia ~ - , s r ~ ~. ~. Fl O ~.. t~t.• . ~ It . IQ W 12 14 2 ~ ~` r 3 f i 2 3 a 14 ~ I8 ; 4 ~ +. ~ i7ktET/ • ItIIJ1 ST. 4 8 4 13 •~ _ 1 24 .. 16 '. W 6 20 * 3 w~ ~~ - ~ ~ ` ~ JOUST ST. ui iT :_ $ ' 19 . w. ~ t ~ 7 a ~ a r ~'' ~ ~~ ~ to Q Id Z . T. ~ .10 ~ a. 'i ~ .. J 22 ..• :: ~ : ~ . _ s s - ~ ,. b• lo. ~ a Litt! ' 21 ~ F~ . AI ~ a . .~• `s •~. s , '~ a . • z 4• s ~ e Z zo • si_ io '~~ ~,; rwauunsT .` , z . ~ ~. ' • - Is, 22 •~ 11 I~ µ ~ f (0 II K ` 14. C{ 1• IT / - li ~ t4 ~ 1 s .~; i ~ ... ` ~ ~ y ~ ~ `~ r~ IT 1• • IR ~ » !1 2! Zs ~ sa 2s P RI W Q ~ ,~' 20 . , ;.. "' •"` . "~'-' Mc~' MIRAO` CZ . , w. rlaos<TIKw+ ou ~ :e ~-. 23 ~ ~ >ss •~~•~ • t 0 ~qi i 1p ~i~g~~~~~~~5 ~iao ~: ~0~1~~~~~i~B i i, ' ~~~; ill; ~ _ ;~ ~r ~~ 0 ~y t 0 ~ a ZM 0 O ~f- FmZ tv VI 3 U Z K Q _ O p 'Q U~a ~~O ~ J Z 0 Q >_ J ~ d Q1 ~ ~ ~ (~ Q ~ Z ~ ~ OJ ~ W ~ ~ a °- ~~~ ~' ~~ ~~ ~~ w ~~ ~ ~ I~ i~;; ~, ~;~~ ~:, ~g~l, I ~; i it iii i1 ~+ r r • • r RECEIVED M AY i 6 13~~t SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET pF MERIDIAN Proposed Development Name HARTFORD SUB City MERIDIAN Date Reviewed 5/12/94 Preliminary Stage XXXXX Final Engineer/Developer __ .Hubble Engr. / Vilva Laxmi Development The following SUBDIVISION NAME is approved by the Ada County Engineer or his designee per the requirements of the IDAHO STATE CODE. NA(LTI=O /1.1~ sly ~ D ~- ~-~ Date ~~2 ~ The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA OUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Boise City Street Name Ordinance. The followinq_existina street names shalt appear on the plat as: "N. TEN MILE ROAD" "W. USTICK ROAD" The following new street names are approved and shall appear on the plat as: "N. CHAMOIS AVENUE" "W. WILDER STREET" ~i~(1 r~lUO~2 CDJ2T The following proposed street names are duplications and therefore cannot be used. Please choose new names and have them approved by the street name committee: "HARTFORD" "ROYAL" "WHITETAIL" The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. /~ ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE, AgEN~Y F;FfP S~NTATIVES OR DESIGNEES Ada County Engineer John Priester Date ~1~~ Ada Planning Assoc. Terri Raynor '~f-"l_- Date ~L/~/ `I ~' Meridian Fire District Representative Date NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed !!!! Sub Index Street Index NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS ok ~ ~ TRISUBSISM CITY.FRM ~ • • J_ r 3 _. - ---.--- -y, :,3 . } .. .:. I r~ !J ,L~~ i RT ;I I i ~ `. ~. ~ w 17 ' a 10 20 21 22 23 24.25 Z6 27 28 2! 30 32 15 w ~' -_.----i---_. 14 13 12 8 0 10 11 1 2 5 8 7 8 10 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 I 13 I ~ 12 j 11 ~ _. 1---r- -- ------------'~ 10 8~,~- 4:3 2~ 2 3 4 S ~~. S S O RI _ _ _ _ ~ . __ ~:ADA PLANNING AS~1. .. ~: - ~ .~ - :APR 1 41994 PY~ ~C'SEOC: . - g Fl ~~ o _ F,.it. - It . 10. W M1 i _ - . - N -} s, s - 1 a e 14 i 2 3 s I ~ ~ s - .- (. O • 8 .. 4 Zi 3 ~ K iM[L7/RI1R iT 4 q 4 •' ! I. !4 la i' a ,.- ~.~ •.+• ~ JOUST ~-. ••_.~ .IS• w. ,.. s ~ ~ • ~ e • ' . ~ . s ~ • a i LI • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~s ~ N 1 ' ~ .Q • K M VtMItM . 1' w t. • - a ~ . n ' : ~ p ~ ~ ' ~ i. ' n I• It ~ s P R W Q :. CENTRAL ~ ~•• DIS~TRI^CT ~~^ HEALTH ~~ Return to: DEPARTMENT ~r ~ ~ ^ Boise REVIEW SHEET ~ Ag~ ~ ^ Eagle ^ Garden City Rezone # ~-Meridian I Use # ^ Kuna relimina Final/Short Plat /9~i~o~~ S'v4.D/yisi~~ ^ ACz ^ 1. We have no objections to this proposal. ^ 2. We recommend denial of this proposal. ^ 3. SpeC'rfic knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can commern on this proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can commern concerning individual sewge disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. We^can approve this proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: 2 feet ^ 4 feet 7. After written approval from appropriate ernities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: Cernral .sewage ^ Community sewage system ^ Community water well ^ Irnerim sewage ~ Cernral water ^ Individual sewage ^ Individual water 8. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of HeaRh and Welfare, Division of Environmernal Quality: Cernral sewage ^ Community sewage system ^ Community water ^ Sewage dry lines ® Cernral water ® 9. Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding probelm. ^ 10. This department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined rf other considerations indicate approval. ^ 11. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan reiew for any: ^ Food establishment ^ Swimming pools or spas ^ Child Care Cerner ^ Beverage establishment ^ Grocery store 13.' STD.~iy ~./~-7Z ~~~r~iy~T' s~i~-/~~a% DATE: ~~~ n Reviewed by: ~~5 S~A-lf 6~ ~Y'oVr~¢rX ~~cc~ ~~y~(o,~S~4~S ~T~,~S~ CDHD 10-91 rcb • • 'N~cha ~C ~~ehcd~ ~lmugatia~ Dre~ztct 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-888-6201 Phones: Area Code 208 James C. Merkle Hubble. Engineering, Inc. 9550 West Bethel Court Boise, ID 83709 OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Boise 343-1884 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Boise 345-2431 RE: Land Use Change Application for Hartford Subdivision Dear Mr. Merkle: Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to file with the Irrigation District for its review on the above- referenced development. You were previously sent a complete packet of information concerning Land Use Change, urban irrigation, and exclusion. If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call on Donna Moore at the District's office or John Anderson, the District's Water Superintendent at the District's shop. Sincerely, DAREN R. COON, SECRETARY/TREASURER NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT DRC/dnm cc: File Water Superintendent Vijya Laxmi Development, Inc. Meridian Planning and Zoning enc. APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 17 May 1994 Mt~Y 13 '94 (@=44 • • PAGE.~61 `` ~KOlry~,~ ~~' I~~l~L~ ~N~~NVE~RING, iN~. ~ a~ e~,o eetr~cl wart .ease, idsho a~ 2oer322t . Fax Pas#-Pt"' Fax Note 767F1 ~ ~ ra ~ ~a~• Co Phone ~ Phcmme ~ Fax M Fax ~y~~y~::.. t~Car Iirts. Sale's: , ... ir$'i7CwitiR~• t13C H~ .~iII pl''Cl1IIliI13T'Tf~ ~7l$t ~ lYa~ BIFOIB ID tl~IG P]8t Shown on of the plat The notes below reflect the wpty im Whig the plat notes std re$d i. ~u tots ar+e she re~sl tests, e~ept for i,ot ~, Bloak ~, r~ 1,16 al~d ~~, alcac~C ~ and Lot ~, slocdc 4 w are dc~gnatad ~ ~~ area tc~ that are owned artd maintauted by tt~e t~rnnevwners assaAation. 5. .vl lot lines man ak a public right-af-w~y tine have a 1o foot wide perxnaoaenl public utiaitiea, strrsct tight, drainage and n casement, e~ceprt as noted otlieswise. The eba~we tames are bed made m the Hartford Subdivision preliminary plat, and copies of t~ rerised play vsn'1t be detiver~d to affioe. )?tease aooept my ~otogies far gray incor-vrnienee this may have c~uscd you, and thank you for your time. SfuCOrely, ~~~.~ ~CGy L PetsonB Asst. ~'so~ect C.nor~linator cx. Gary.Smi~, P.E,, ~ ~~ wi~,~ i:V.0~1.1tr ** TOTflL PAGE.0~1 *~ MAY 1 9 1994 CITY OF ~F~~~~C~ 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208-888-6201 Phones: Area Code 208 Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Annexation/Zoning Hartford Subdivision Commissioners: OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861 Boise 343-1884 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Boise 345-2431 The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District has reviewed the proposed preliminary plat for Hartford Subdivision. If this area is to become a subdivision, the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District will need to do a review on all drainage from this site. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District's Fivemile Drain courses through the north edge. of this property. The right-of-way of the Fivemile Drain is 100 feet: 50 feet from the center each way. If the developer plans on encroaching within this easement, the District will need to review the plans and the developer will need to enter into a License Agreement. All laterals and waste ways must be protected. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District recommends that pressurized urban irrigation water be placed within the subdivision. This District requires that a Land Use Change/Site Development application be file3 for review prior to final platting. Contact Donna Moore at 343-1884 or 466-7861 for further information. Sincerely, John P. Anderson District Water Superintendent pc: Bill Henson File - office File - shop APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000 13 May 1994 OFFICIALS ,, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY 0. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney MAY 0 6 ~99q~ COUNCIL MEMBERS 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 ~~~~i[ j~~ GRANT P. KINGSFORD Y d Mayor ~ Av ~ O ~[fA/. RONALD R. 70LSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner 6 Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman • Planning S Zoning TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, may we have your answer by: Mav 24. 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 5/3/94 HEARING DATE: 5/31/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning with a Preliminary Plat for Hartford Subdivision BY: Viiya Laxmi Development and Hubble Engineering LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North_of Ustick Road. East of Ten Mile Road JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z~ GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C ^WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: We require a permanent 10-foot wide public utilities easement along all lots adjacent to a road right-of-way dedicated to public or private use. • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN Tim Adams Idaho Power ~~,A.p~s 322-2047 5.11 '~~ • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR.. City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Trea3urer GARY 0. SMITH, P.E. Clty Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS. Fira Chief W.L. "BILL" GOROON, Police Chiel WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner 8 Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON RF C~~~~~' Chairman - Planning d Zoning JUN - 9 1994 CITY OF MERIDIAN TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, may we have your answer by: May 24, 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 5/3/94 HEARING DATE: 5/31/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning with a Preliminary Plat for Hartford Subdivision BY: Viiya Laxmi Develoament and Hubble Engineering LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Ustick Road. East of Ten Mile Road JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P2 JiM SHEARER, P2 CHARLES ROUNTREE, P2 TIM HEPPER, P/Z~ GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: US WEST REQUEST A 10' EASEMENT ALONG FRONT AND REAR PROPERTY LINES, AND A 5' EASEMENT ALONG ALL SIDE LOT LINES. SIGNED: A.J. CARLSON ~~~ SJt2V~1O~rn HUBBL~ENGINEERING, INC. ~ 9550 W. Bethel Court • Boise, Idaho 83709 (208) 322-8992 • Fax (208) 378-0329 TRANSMITTAL LETTER To: ~~ ~ (A~ Attn: DATE I~C~'T Job No.• Project:• ~~~~ p( WE ARE SENDING YOU: _ As Requested ~ Attached _ Under Separate Cover, Via FOR YOUR: Use _ Record _ information _ Review and Comment _ Bidding _ Cost Estimating _ THE FOLLOWING: _ Prints _ Plans _ Specifications _ Shop Drawings _ Samples _ Copy of Letter _ Copies Date Sheet No. Description ~v a W•~~ ~~ REMARKS: ~i A f p / ~,~t..Wx c ~7 n ~ 6~ ~.' ~I IV ~' ~~' V~t/K.IL "" (J-~-, I ~, . ~ 'f'V~ ~~~ ".`.~~ . U ~d 1/u~ v Copy To: _ With Encl. _ With Encl. With Encl. By: ~~1.~'~ U Signed: CEIVED TOTAL MILES: TOTAL TIME: TIME DELIVERED: RECEIVED ~~ C 1 6 ~~ CITY OF MERIDIAN ``~ ENGIiyF~~ • • .~~s u~ ~oo~ r rw~n_~w~rrn~w~n_ ~w~n \' ~ ~ Jy) 9550 Bethel Court ^ Boise, Idaho 83709 208/322-8992 ^ Fax 2081378-0329 August 16, 1994 PN: 94040 Ciry of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 ATTN: Shari Stiles Dear Ms. Stiles: ~~~~~~~~ AUG 1 6 1994 CITY OF MERIDIAN The following responses are to your comments for the Hartford Subdivision preliminary plat. l . We do not propose a stub street to the north on the preliminary plat as we do not feel it is necessary for the development to the north of us. If the preliminary plat is approved as submitted in this respect, then a variance will be applied for with the final plat. 2. The existing house is included in the annexation and preliminary plat. 3. Direct lot access is prohibited from Ustick; however, the existing house on Ten Mile will continue to access Ten Mile. 4. We have proposed a pedestrian path to Five Mile Creek at the east end of the subdivision. 5. This is a true statement. 6. The developer is Vijya Laxmi Development, Inc., 2526 Airport Way, Boise, Idaho 83705, (208)336-0077. 7. The designers initials are J.C.M. 8. This will be provided. 9. The minimum house size will be 1400 square feet. 10. A development agreement will be negotiated with the city for this annexation. Sincerely, ~~~~ J es C. Merkle, P.E. JCM/mf/2092.1tr a ENG-~ya • • '`~ '`~ RUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. `9 y 9550 Bethel Court ^ Boise, Idaho 83709 2081322-8992 ^ Fax 208/378-0329 August 16, 1994 PN: 94040 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 ATTN: Gary Smith RE: Hartford Subdivision Preliminary Plat and Annexation Comments Dated 5/25/94 Dear Mr. Smith: FtECEI~1'ED AUK ~ s ~ss~ CITY OF MERIDIAN The following responses aze to your comments concerning Hartford Subdivision. 1. The description you aze referring to is the typical language on deeds from the title company; however, the annexation will be to the centerline (section line) in Ustick and Ten Mile Road. 2. The 40 feet will be the minimum chord dimensions. 3. We have adjusted the preliminary plat to include the house and dedication of right-of--way and improvements will be made along Ten Mile in accordance with the Highway District. 4. I have submitted you an azea wide topography showing Five Mile Creek in relation to this property. 5. No this cannot be accomplished as we have discussed. 6. The irrigation ditch will be piped across this project. 7. This vicinity map will be provided for your use. 8. The benchmazk for the contours is a 5/8" pin at the intersection of Ustick and Ten Mile. The elevation is 2554.83. 9. These will be submitted for review prior to final plat approval. 10. This will be done during final design of the drainage facilities. Mr. Smith August 16, 1994 Page 2 • 11. The applicant is aware of this issue and will take precautions to insure potential residents are aware of the proximity of the treatment plant. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. Sincerely, awes C. Merkle, P.E. Attachments JCM/mf/2091.1tr • • September 16, 1994 City of Meridian Ms. Shari Stiles City Planning & Zoning Administrator 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Development Agreement for Hartford Subdivision Annexation Dear Ms. Stiles: AC~CEi~1lED SEP 1 9 1994 Ct l [ ~.I s i~.i.s.ra..:... Vijya Laxmi hereby agrees that after they become the owner of the property described in the preliminary plat for the. Hartford Subdivision, they will enter into a Subdivision Development Agreement as authorized by the City of Meridian ordinances 11-2416L and 11-2417D. Vijya Laxmi intends to develop Hartford Subdivision which is a 58 lot, 20 acre subdivision located at the northeast corner of Ustick and Ten Mile Roads. This subdivision will be developed in accordance with the City of Meridian's ordinances and said development agreement will address site specific items required during the approval process. Sincerely, / ~G%~ Ray K. atel, Secretary Vijya Laxmi Development, Inc. T ` ~J ~ • - v ~ I 1 1 GLENN J. RHOGES, President SHERRY R. HUBER, Vice President JAMES E. BRUCE, Secretary . __ ... ,. _. _ _._ f.~...-, n nrrq~ ~ ~ nem'+w~ nr,+ ,..~~,. .c....,' - ~.,~.. .•~ -tY1--j. 111: ~ 1:~ _I_~"~~ r5---~5-3-1 FR~t~t~ ^£~`~1:~nr:~ent Sec4°ices UT`~ ~ LCT : C~ELT~~1 LV AitY C LJt~T L32'1~ LC ORD JU~/1 Y 11TL 'JN (neveioper - Vijya Laxmi Development, rnc., 2526 Airport 5~ay, 3oise, iD 8C705} (_ngineAr/Surveyor - nubble Engineering, Inc., 3ames:iKerkle, 0550 ,~. Bethel Court, Boise, ID 83709) PRFLIMiNAP.Y REPE3RT - NOT FINAL UNTIL. AF2ROVED B'~ THE ACID COMT~EI SSIGN _. H-~rtsord is a 19.6-acre, 57-lot, single family resideritiai ~ubdicision located on the northeast corner of Ustic;c and Ten *~iile. There are 2880-feet of new public streets planned. L1is application inclu3eS an annexation to Meridian and a zone ~:hange from R-T to R- ~ . '_' , uDNERAL I1vFCRMATICN LEAJ AGENCY - tileridian r,CgEg - 19,6 FEET OF NEW PUBLIC STREETS - 2380 Z,pTS - 57 EgISTILdG ZCI3ING - RT PROPOSED ZCNIN~ - R-4 ESTIMATED VEHICLE TRIPS PER LAY - 570 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZGNE - 256 L.F. OF FRONT AGE CN U,>°tick - 1322-feet ~TOST %ECENT TRAFFIC COUNTS - Date 1G/s/~Z `1oiLUne o64 FL'NCTIvI$AL CLASSiF'ICr'lTION N,AP DRSIGNATION - .Minor Arterial ADA CCL~3TY RIDGE-TO-RIVERS PATHWAY PLAN - Lane F,SISTING RIGHT-C3F-WAY - 50-feet RE~'JiRED RIGHT-OF-WA~C' - 90-feet; 45-fee-t from centerline} Ustick Road is improved with 25-feet of paving.. L,F. Gc^ FRONTAGE. CN Ten Mile -- 56h-feet x~OST RECENT TRAFFIC COUNTS - N/A FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP DESIGNATION - Local ado county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 :~i.FT TivT'NI^.Y:~T ~!~1'-~1 - ~ii T1 ~R! ' Jt!~~_~`l.~! ON • ~-~ _-_ ~iay 19; 1994 Pace 2 y_"~u i~OLNT•Y R~J~.rr..-'~'~~'R~Vr:l! ?I-:'~ri4`]El,`i ?L1~_I`I - iYQllf~e !TT TT • T • 1!7 Ef1S1~NG RIGriT-Oc-+~Ir1t - 50-feet REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY - 9^-feet: ~5-feet frc« cer:terline) ien i~!ile is improved with 24-feet of pavir_g. iiiPACT FEE BENEFI•" ZvtdE - West :,da IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - Near Rural ~. Jtaff recommends the proposed st~.ib street to the west on Wild- er Drive be eliminated and replace with a stub street to the West vri Whitetail Drive. '~. UStiCk Road 15 a section line rCad C13cc;fiad 3S d 1!1'nQr arte- rial with bike lane designation from the Ridge to Rivers Path- way Plan: therefore 90-feet of right-of-way are required. ~. The AC~iD Capital improverment P13n indicates that UStiCK Road is not approved for use of Road Impact Fee funds to increase itS Capacity ; therefore, RGad impact Fee OffS2tSTia'_v riGt be given for constructior_ of the roadway improve.*nents teXcluding sidewalk) along Ustick Road, but may be given for right-of-way dedication In additiGri tG what 2X1StS nGW. If the d~-relG~er wishes to be paid for the additional right-of-way, he/she must submit an application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, iri accordance with Section 15 Gf ACHD Ordi- nance #188. o. Ten i~iile Road is a section line road in an impact area, there- fore the District requires 90-feet Gf right-cf-way. .. T'ne aCHD Capital improvement Plan indicates that Ten ?file is not approved far use of Road Impact Fee funds to increase its capacity; therefore, Road I,«pact Fee offsets. ,~~ay rot be given for construction of the roadway improvements (excluding side- walk) along Ten Mile, but may be given for right-of-w-ay dedica- tion ir. addition tG what exists now. If the developer wishes to be paid for the additional right-of-way, he!she must submit an application to the impact fee administrator prior to break- iig ground, ire accordance with Section 15 of AHD Ordinance X188. 8. Staff is concerned about future access for the parcel to the north. Staff recommends that the proposed Wilder Drive be extended to the north property boundary of the parcel. 9. The existing dwelling on Ten Pine is considered by staff to be an outparcel, therefore improvements will be required to ex- tend along this parcel abutting Ten Miie. 10. This application is scheduled for public hearing by the Meridi- an Planning & Zoning Cc<<'ss-ion Gn May 31, 1994. s:~.Lli~?I?~IAry ~ LET - Tr ~..~?.:_.~Si:BDIVISIGN . lay . i9 i994 PaQC- ~ , .~iiE SrECirIC nEQL'IccEi•'.ENTS_ _. Dedicate ~5-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Jstick Road abutting parcel (2C additional feet;. The aw:,er will be ~~ompensated for this additional right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone. 2. Provide pavement widening on 'Jstick Road far tr~ree 12-foot traffic lanes with a 5-foot paved shoulder. Coordinate with District Traffic Services staff. 3. Canstruct 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along 'Jstick Road a~utting parcel adjacent to the new right-of-way line. 4. Direct lot ar parcel access to Ustick Road is prohibited, in compliance with District policy. Lat access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. 5. Dedicate 45-feet of -right-of-way from the centerline of Ten .~;ile Road abutting parcel (20 additional feet). The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone. 6. Provide pavement widening an Ten Mile far three 12-f oat traffic lanes with 5-foot paved shoulders. Coordinate with District Traffic Services staff. 7. Construct 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk alarg Ter. Miles Road rir_cluding outparcel? abutting parcel adjacent to the new right-of-way line. 8. Direct lot ar parcel access. to Ten Mile Raad is prohibited, in _ compliance with District policy. Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. 9. Align the proposed entrance tc the subdivision on Ustick Road tRartford Avenue) with the entrance to the proposed Candle- iight Subdivision to the south. 1C. Reconfigure site plan to west en Wilder Drive and on Whitetail Drive. eliminate proposed stub street to the construct a stub street to the west STAP3DARD REQUIREMEDiTS _. street and drainage improvements required in the public right- of-way shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and policies. ~r.;.~ti?-23ra~:'J N"s:~= - ~FOR%~ r~JBi~1VlSIuN . ~;ay 1^ ; L394 Pace " Jed! Cdted srreecs and ~„}ra i Zagn Syste.^.1S Shall De de=' ~?:ed dnd constructed in ._onformance with District standards and poli- cies. 3. specifications, land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACRD shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54-1215. ~. Provide written applaval from the appropriate irriga- tianidrainage district authorizing storm runoff into their system. 5. i~GCate Gk3StrLiCtloilS (Litllltji facilities, lirigatl.Gri and drairi- age appurtenances, etc.} outside of the proposed street i!11- provements. Authorization for relocations shall be obtained from t~',e appropriate entity. 5. Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across par- :, e i . 'i SUbi~llt tl"iree sets of street construction, AlanS to the District nor review and appropriate action. 8. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and appropriate action by ACRD. The proposed dra~rage system shall conform to the requirements of Meridian and shall retain all storm water on-site. Public street drainage facilities shall be lacated ir, the public right-of-way or in a drainage easement set aside specif- icaiiy for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, cr other valuable amenities placed in said easzinent. Drainage ease*nents and their use restrictions shall be r_oted on the plat. 9. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for review and appropriate action by ACHD. i~. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot property lines when the driveways are not being shared with the adjacent property. li. Developer shall provide the District witl'i a copy of the record- ed plat prier to the irstallatian of street name signs. Street signs will not be ordered until ail fees have been paid and a copy of the recorded plat has been provided to ACHD staff, The copy of the recorded plat shall Shaw the recording information. as inscribed by the Deputy County Recorder. 3 i~~ 6 E. ~~~~~~E~i E~ ~ n o ~.s 4 ~ T ~ ~ i I ~ :, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ I~ ~ I i ~~ C m 2 i ,1k {~ ~ 1 .. ,I. I ~ ' ~ i Z tY C I C ~o~~ N`--~-~r T s per nu ,~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ i ® i j ~ ® s ~ ~ 'I ~ ~ ~ ® i ~ • ( ~ Z ~ ~ ~ / I I ~ J ti ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ® ~ O ® ~w ~ ! ' O ~, ~ ,I Qa ' 1 F ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ _~ , ~ ~a., ~ o ~_ r~ gp(~ ~~ ~ i$$ ~9 ® I ~ © ' ~ ~ v~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~© W~ l ~ ~ dl O I~ ~ j cn _ ~• ~ ~ .I ~ yy y ,.a aw I' ~ IIII '" ~ 0 ~ ' I I I ~ `' ~ ~` i _ i + 1 / ' ~ O ~ ®i ~ j ~ ~ ~!~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o I. , ~ ~ ~ ' ~ y 1 "** I N ~ ii ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ® ~ I O J • ® ~ ~ ~s 1~''!~!1'~ 'I ~ ~~ ~ li ~~~ !~ ~ i t i ~ ~, u11 _ I • « ~„ n~~w • • MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: MAY 31.1994 APPLICANT: VIJYA LAXMI DEVELOPMENT AND AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 5 NUBBLE ENGINEERING REQUEST: PUBLIC HEARING: ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HARTFORD SUBDNISION AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS "REVIEWED" SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENT ~v SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS C~ I ~,! f L W ~c~ Flk OTHER: • MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: June 14.1984 APPLICANT: VIJYA LAXAMI DEVELOPMENT INC AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 11 REQUEST: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR HARTFORD SUBDIVISION AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS FINDNGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW of L ~~ 1 ~ ~I s~ ~ ~~ ~~~ P r~` ~~ ~~ G~ ~'~ ~~ s ~ G a5 ~ ~ P C ~ C~ f ,~ ~~~.../// ~i .l , ~ !/ ~~~I'J OTHER: • • BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION VIJYA LARMI DEVELOPMENT, INC.. RAY PATEL ANNEJCATION AND ZONING . Q A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 3W 1/4, SECTION 35, T.4 N., R.1 W.. B.M. NORTH OF USTICR ON USTICR ROAD HARTFORD SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN, IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for consideration on May 31, 1994, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the Commission having heard and taken oral and written testimony and the Applicant appearing through its engineer, Jim Merkle, and having duly considered the matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of public hearing on the annexation and zoning was published for two ( 2 ) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for May 31, 1994, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the May 31, 1994, hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and television stations. 2. That the property included in the application for HARTFORD SUBDIVISION FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS Page - 1 • annexation and zoning is described in the application, and by this reference is incorporated herein; that the property is approximately 19.57 acres in size; it is located at 3340 North Ten Mile Road on the east side and in the northeast corner of the intersection of Ustick Road and Ten Mile Road; the development would include 57 lots. 3. That the property is presently zoned by the County RT (Rural Transition); that the Applicant has requested that the property be zoned R-4 Residential and stated that the use proposed would be for R-4 Residential development. 4. The present land use has one single family residential home and the remainder of the property surrounding the single family residence is used 'for agricultural purposes; that the Applicant's application for subdivision approval, submitted with the application for annexation and zoning stated that they have approximately 3.17 dwelling units per acre, that the houses would meet the ordinance requirement which is 1,400 square foot homes in the $80,000 to $125,000 range; that all streets are proposed to be built to ACRD standards with access to the project being off Ustick Road; that the Applicant's representative testified that they desire a sewer lift station, that they would install pressurized irrigation, that the house would be in the subdivision with access onto ten Mile Road, that irrigation would be piped, that a note would be placed on the plat regarding the nearness of the Meridian Sewer Plant, that the Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as being a single family residential area, that they would berm and HARTFORD SUBDIVISION FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS Page - 2 • • fence for landscape, and that they will apply for a variance of the 1,000 foot limitation on the length of one of the blocks. 5. That the property is adjacent and abutting to the present City limits. 6. The Applicant is not the owner of record of the property but the owners of record, Ray William Wilder and Janet Wilder, have requested the annexation and consented to the Application. 7. That the property included in the annexation and zoning application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 8. That the entire parcel of ground requested to be annexed is presently included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 9. That there were two people testifying at the hearing; that John Shaffer, the owner of the property to the east., testified that he was not against the development but that he thought there should be access to Ten Mile Road and that he desired that there be a barrier for foot traffic to prevent them from going onto his property; Tami Shaffer testified about her concerns over school problems; Ray Wilder the property owner testified that the water was not being used and that if a stub street were required to access the property to the north it would no go anywhere. 10. The- Ada County Highway District, Department of Health, the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District, City Engineer, City Police Department, Idaho Power, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, Meridian School District, Ada County Street Name Committee and City HARTFORD SUBDIVISION FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS Page - 3 Fire Department did submit comments and such are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 11. The City Engineer, Gary Smith, submitted comments and he questioned whether an above creek crossing could be made to connect sanitary sewer to the existing trunk sewer line, what would be the status of the irrigation ditch crossing this parcel, that restrictive covenants need to be submitted, that the highest seasonal groundwater elevations need to be determined, and that the sewer treatment plant is close by and that odors do escape from the plant on occasion. 12. That the Planning director submitted comments, some of which were similar to those of the City Engineer, but also that a development agreement was required as a condition of annexation and that a link to the proposed bike path on Five Mile Creek was needed. 13. The Meridian School District's comment on this annexation request was that the subdivision proposed for the land would mean 20 elementary aged children, 17 middle school aged children and 20 senior high aged students; that Linder Elementary School is at 137 of capacity, Meridian Middle School at 129$ of capacity and the Meridian High School at 116$ of capacity; the District went on to state as follows: "There is little opportunity to shift attendance boundaries since the surrounding schools are also well over capacity. Before we could support this subdivision, we would need land dedicated to the district or at least made available at a minimum price for a school site in this area. The site would need water and sewer service available. In addition we would need to pass another bond issue for the construction of HARTFORD SUBDIVISION FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS Page - 4 schools." • 14. That the property is shown on the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as being in a Single Family Residential area. 15. That in the Rural Area section of the Comprehensive Plan, Land Use, Rural Areas, Section 6.3, it does state that land in agricultural activity should so remain in agricultural activity until urban services can be provided. 16. That Meridian has, and is, experiencing a population increase; that there are pressures on land previously used for agricultural uses to be developed into residential subdivision lots. 17. That the property can be physically serviced with City water and sewer, but the sewer may be a problem because a lift station may be required and it is the policy of the City to avoid lift stations if at all possible; another means of sewer service may have to be investigated. 18. That the R-4, Residential District is described in the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 3 as follows: (R-4) LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT: The purpose of the (R-4) District is to permit the establishment of low density single-family dwellings, and to delineate those areas where predominantly residential development has, or is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan or the City, and to protect the integrity of residential areas by prohibiting the intrusion of incompatible non- residential uses. The (R-4) District allows for a maximum of four (4) dwellings units per acre and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian."; that the R-4 zoning district requires a minimum of 1,400 square feet to be included in houses in that zone. HARTFORD SUBDIVISION FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS Page - 5 • 19. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Residential Policies, 2.1U states as follows: "Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi-family, townhouses, apartments, condominiums, etc. ) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities." 20. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Rural Areas, 6.3 c., it states as follows: "Within the Urban Service Planning Area development may occur in densities as low as 3 dwellings per acre if physical connection is made to existing City of Meridian water and sewer service and the property is platted and subdivided . .~ 21. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Rural Areas, 6.4, it states as follows: "Residential development is allowed in the rural area provided that said development does not exceed the Rural Residential Agricultural density, unless it is inside the Urban Service Planning Area and City sewer and water is provided, then Low, Medium and High density residential may be considered. All residential development must also comply with the other appropriate sections of this plan." 22. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Housing, Housing Policies, at page 66, it states as follows: "1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile homes, multi-family, townhouses arrangements), ." "1.3 An open housing market for all persons, regardless of race, sex, age, religion or ethnic background." "1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping centers should be encouraged." 23. That there is a population influx into the City of Meridian at the present time which has been going on for some time and is likely to continue; that the land is relatively close ~ to HARTFORD SUBDIVISION FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS Page - 6 • • Meridian and economic conditions are making it difficult to continue farming in the area. 24. That in prior requests for annexation and zoning in this area the previous Zoning Administrator has commented that annexation could be conditioned on a development agreement including an impact fee to help acquire a future school or park site to serve the area and that annexations should be subject to impact fees for park, police, and fire services as determined by the city and designated in an approved development agreement; that such comment is equally applicable to this Application. 25. That in 1992 the Idaho State Legislature passed amendments to the Local Planning Act, which in 67-6513 Idaho Code, relating to subdivision ordinances, states as follows: "Each such ordinance may provide for mitigation of the effects of subdivision development on the ability of political subdivisions of the state, including school districts, to deliver services without compromising quality of service delivery to current residents or imposing substantial additional costs upon current residents to accommodate the subdivision."; that the City of Meridian is concerned with the increase in population that is occurring and with its impact on the City being able to provide fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services to its current residents and to those moving into the City; the City is also concerned that the increase in population is burdening the schools of the Meridian School District which provide school service to current and future residents of the City; that the. City knows that the increase in population does not sufficiently increase the tax base to offset HARTFORD SUBDIVISION FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS Page - 7 • • the cost of providing fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services; and the City knows that the increase in population does not provide sufficient tax base to provide for school services to current and future students. 26. That pursuant to the instruction, guidance, and direction of the Idaho State Legislature, the City may impose either a development fee or a transfer fee on residential property, which, if possible, would be retroactive and apply to all residential lots in the City because of the imperilment to the health, welfare, and safety of the citizens of the City of Meridian. 27. That Section 11-9-605 C states as follows: "Right-of-way for pedestrian walkways in the middle of long blocks may be required where necessary to obtain convenient pedestrian circulation to schools, parks or shopping areas; the pedestrian easement shall be at least ten feet (10') wide." 28. That Section 11-9-605 G 1. states as follows: "Planting strips shall be required to be placed next to incompatible features such as highways, railroads, commercial or industrial uses to screen the view from residential properties. Such screening shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') wide, and shall not be a part of the normal street right of way or utility easement." 29. That Section 11-9-605 H 2. states as follows: "Existing natural features which add value to residential development and enhance the attractiveness of the community (such as trees, watercourses, historic spots and similar irreplaceable amenities) shall be preserved in the design of the subdivision;" 30. That Section 11-9-605 K states as follows: "The extent and location of lands designed for linear open space corridors should be determined by natural features and, to lesser extent, by man-made features such as utility easements, transportation rights of way or water rights of HARTFORD SUBDIVISION FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS Page - 8 • • - abEa SNOIS[1'ION00 '3 SJNIQ11I3 [~IOISIAIQSf1S Q2I03y2IrdH ~I~~ado.zd ~o s~auMO o~ aoT~.ou ~o buTTTEUi ar~~ bu-rpnToui ~ ~.atu uaaq anEq uEipi~ayJ ~o d~t0 aq~ ;o saouEUip.zO aq~ Io puE ~o~i buTIIIIETd TEaoZ aq~ ~o s~uauia.ztnba~ TE.znpaoo~d aq~ TTE ~Eyy • T sxorsnzoxoo • parioTTo~ puE uanib a.zaM uoissiunuo0 buiuoZ puE bu-ruu~Ta aq~ a.zo~aq sa~npaoo~d TTE PuE MEt tIq pa~Tnba.Z sE uanTb sEM aoTa.ou .zadoid ~Euy • Z£ • 3a.iIaUIdO'ranap uTL[a.TM suOTSTAO.Zd ~EMLIa.Ed [IETS~Sapad puE aTo~ioTq 6uiMaina~ uagM ( ~oi~~siQ dEMLjbTg ~I~.uno~ Epp tCq pa.zEda.zd sE ) ~.uno0 Epp .zoo '[EnuEW u Tsaa uETSa,sapaa-aTo o-rg aq~ ~apTSUOO TTEgs uo-rss-runuo0 buiuoZ puE buiuuETa puE uOTSSTUnuO~ aqy •Ea.z~ buTUUETa aoinzaS uEq~n ~I~tO aqq ~nogbno~q~ papino~d aq uEO (aTigo~uo~nE aq~ uio~~ a~.EiEdas puE ~oui~sTp si I;DTL;M) 1uaa.st~s uOT~E~,30dsuE~a. a~EUZa~.TE uE a.Ei;a. os s~uautasEa a~.EZEdas sE ~0 1CEM ;o ~LjbT~ oTTgnd aLj~ ~o ~3Ed sE sa.uatudojanap Mau uTq~TM pabE~nooua aq TTEgs s~EMq~Ed uEi~~.sapad puE aTodoig sMOTjo~ sE sa~.E~.s r! 509-6-TT uoi~oag ~EL;y • T£ „' Se'3T~TTT.7E~ uo-r~.Ea~oa~ puE sEa~E x~Ed ~spooq~oggbtau TEi~uapisa~ i~uiT oy •g puE : sabExuiT TEU.za~.ui aq~ o~ anp EazE auk uTq~TM uOTa.EDT~Ta.uapT TEOO'I aouEqua oy •5 :sash puET usq~n ~uaoECpE anTSUa~uT a~oiu .za~~nq oy •~ ~E~TgEq '[E~n~Eu puE sabEUTE~p 's~EMia~EM XTTEZOadsa ~antEn TE~n~Eu puE o-ruaos Ea.zE 6uzn~zasuoo ui aTo.z .zoCEiu E dETd oy • £ S~IEM aTotCoTq ~ st~EM}[TEM ~ STTE.Ia. SOS DIEM ~O s~gbT.z uTLj~TM s~uaa.sAs aoEds uado puE 3[3Ed ~.aauuoo.za~u-r oy • Z :ssauuado an.zasa~d oy •T :animas s~opTi~oo aaEds uado ~EauiT ~(a~.E~s TESn~EU E uT a.~aT) sEa.2E panoid~uTUn ~o ~ (dTuo 1tEML,Ia.Ed padL aspu2T E ) sEa~E pano.zduiT -Ttuas ' (padEaspuET ) sEa~E pano~duiT s~ • sa~n~.Ea~ ~aq~.o ~o BEM ~o s~.ubzs pEO.zTiE~ ~s~CEM~a~.EM 's~.aas~.s TE-r~a~~E ~.uaaECpE ~uo.z~ sai~~zado.zd TE-r~uapTSa~ ~o uoi~.oa~ozd aye ~o~ pa.zinba.z aq dEUz s.zopT.z~oa aaEds uado TEauTT .zo buTUaa.zas ~ bu-rdEOSpuEZ • BEM • • within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. 2. That the City of Meridian has authority to annex land pursuant to 50-222, Idaho Code, and Section 11-2-417 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City•of Meridian; that exercise of the City's annexation authority is a Legislative function. 3. That the Planning and Zoning Commission has judged this annexation and zoning application by the provisions contained in Section 50-222, Idaho Code, Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Meridian City Ordinances, the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the record submitted to it and things of which it can take judicial notice. 4. That all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been complied with. 5. That the Commission may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and State. 6. That the land within the proposed annexation is contiguous to the present City limits of the City of Meridian and the annexation would not be .a shoestring annexation. 7. That the annexation application has been initiated by the Applicant with the consent of the titled owners and the annexation is not upon the initiation of the City of Meridian. 8. That since the annexation and zoning of land is a legislative function, the City has authority to place conditions HARTFORD SUBDIVISION FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS Page - 10 • • upon the annexation of land. Burt vs. The City of Idaho Falls, 105 Idaho 65, 665 P.D 1075 (1983). 9. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, Section 11-9-605 M., which pertains to the tiling of ditches and water ways, and Section 11-9-606 B 14, which pertains to pressurized irrigation; that the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer; that the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance; that, as a condition of annexation the Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address the inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, K, L and prior comments of the previous Planning Director, Wayne Forrey, relating to the lack of adequate recreation facilities and that land set aside for a future park would be desirable, that the City is in need of land set- asides for future public service use, that a school site was not reserved; that the development agreement shall, as a condition of annexation, require that the Applicant, or if required, any assigns, heirs, executors or personal representatives, pay, when required, any development fee or transfer fee adopted by the City; that there shall be no annexation until the requirements of this paragraph are met or, if necessary, the property shall be subject to de-annexation and loss of City services, if the requirements of HARTFORD SUBDIVISION FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS Page - 11 • • this paragraph are not met. The development agreement shall also address the landscaping along Ten Mile Road and Ustick Road, and maintenance thereof, by a mandatory home owners association rather than the individual lot owners. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall require the mandatory homeowners association as a condition of annexation. 10. That the Applicant's property is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, and therefore the, annexation and zoning Application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. 11. That the requirements of the Meridian City Engineer and of the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, Meridian Fire Department, Idaho Power, U. S. West, and the comments of the Meridian Planning Director and City Engineer and these Findings and Conclusion shall be met and addressed in a development Agreement. 12. That all ditches, canals, and waterways shall be tiled as a condition of annexation and if not so tiled the property shall be subject to de-annexation; that the Applicant shall be required to install a pressurized irrigation system, and if not so done the property shall be subject to de-annexation. 13. That the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer and resolve how the water and sewer mains will serve the land; that the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance. 14. That proper and adequate access to the property is available and will have to be maintained; that the house size of HARTFORD SUBDIVISION FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS Page - 12 1,400 square feet~ust be met. • 15. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind the applicant, the titled owners, and their assigns. 16. With compliance of the conditions contained herein, the annexation and zoning of R-4 Residential would be in the best interest of the City of Meridian. ~.li 17. That if these conditions of approval are met the hot' property shall be subject to de-annexation. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONER HEPPER VOTED COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE VOTED COMMISSIONER SHEARER VOTED COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI VOTED CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) VOTED DECISION AND RECONII~IENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City of the City of Meridian ~ounctiL /~ that they approve the annex on and zoning as stated above for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and that if the conditions are not met that the property be de-annexed. MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: HARTFORD SUBDIVISION FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS Page - 13 APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian City Council hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions this l6 ~ day of ~~ctf~ 1994. ROLL CALL COUNCILMAN MORROW COUNCILMAN YERRINGTON COUNCILMAN CORRIE COUNCILMAN TOLSMA MAYOR KINGSFORD (TIE BREAKER) (INITIAL) ~r APPROVED DISAPPROVED. VOTED VOTED VOTED VOTED VOTED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - ,~~~-~.c~ ~"~~~~~~~~~~ • • MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: JULY 12 1994 APPLICANT: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 1 ~ 2_ REQUEST: PRELIMINARY P,~,AT FOR HARTFORD SUBDMSION AND RAMBLE WOOD(TABLED AT JUNE 14.1984 MEETING) AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN P05T OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS MINUTES FROM JUNE 14,1994 MEETINf~ ,~f ,J~`- (Y- ~ l ~,J~-. ~ roc .~~ C ~- ~2 ~~ ~~ y ~,,b ~~ ~~, ~~ Sk ~EJ3-eJ r" . Y OTHER: MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: JUNE 15, 1999 APPLICANT: GLENN JOHNSON HOMES AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 3 REQUEST: ANNEXATION ANp ZONING OF HARTFORD SUBDIVISION AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY WIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: SEE ATTACHED ORDINANCE J~ 0 ~~ ~ti~ ~~ ~~.,cvr BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. JUN 82 '99 14 23 FR CITY OF MERIDIAN 208 884 4259 TO 8871297 P.02i04 • CITY OF ME~DL4N ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE FINDING THAT CERTAIN LAND LIES CONTIGUOUS OR ADJACENT TO TFIE CITY LIMITS Ol? TFIE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO; AND FINDING THAI" THE OWNER HAS MADE A REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION IN WRITING TO THE COUNCIL; AND 'f! IAT SAID LAND BF, ANNEXED TO THE CITY' OF MERIDIAN AND ZONING DESIGNATED LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-4); AND DECLARING THAT SAID LAND, BY PROT'ER LEGAL DESCRII~'TION AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BE A PAIkT OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, ORDERS OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT HEREWITI~; AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINE- ER TO ADD SAID 1'ROPF.RTY TO T1~E OFFICIAL MAPS Ol~ TI-IE Ci'IY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO; AND DIRECTING TI-ZE CLERK OP THE CITY OF ME1t1DIAN TO FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF TI !E ORDINANCE AND MAI' OP THE AREAS TO Bt ANNEXED WITI I ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AUDITOR, TREASUI:CR AND ASSESSOR, AND TFIE STATE TAX COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, PURSUANT TO IDAI-IO CODE SECTION 50-223 AND SECTION 63.2215. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYORAND THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SEC'T'ION I. FINDINGS: That the following described land is contiguous and adjacent to the City of Meridian, Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for annexation to the City of Meridian, Idaho, by the owner of said Property to-wit: A portion of the South half of the SW I/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 35, Township 4 North, Range I West of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Jdaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the corner common to Sections Z and 3 of Township 4 North, Range 1 West, and Sections 35 and. 36 of Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian; thence North 0°53'34" East, a distance of 347.44 feet along the westerly boundary line of said Section 35 to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence leaving GLENN JOHNSON HOMES /HARTFORD SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE JUN 02 '99 14 23 FR CITY OF MERIDIAN 208 884 4259 TO 8871297 P.03i04 • said westerly boundary line South 80°1 I'00" East, a distance 183.85 feet; thence North 00°53'34" East, a distance of 123.21 feet and parallel with said westerly boundary line; thence North 89°14'23" 'W'est, a distance of 151.63 feet to a point on said westerly boundary line; thence South 00°53'34" ~N'est, a distance of 94.27 feet along said westerly boundary line to the 1'OYNT 01= E)rGINNING; Said parcel of land contains 19,750 square feet or 0.45 acres more or less. SEC')('ION 2: That the above-described real property be, and the same is hereby annexed and made a pan of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. SECTION 3: That the real property herein by this ordinance annexed to the City of Meridian hercinabove described shall be zoned Low Density Residential District (R-4). SEC'Z'~ON 4: That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps, comprehensive plan and all official maps depicting the boundaries of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. SEC'EIOIV 5: The zoning designation set forth in Section 3 of this ordinance is subject to the terms and conditions of that. certain Development Agreement by and between the City of Meridian and the owner of the land described in Section 1 dated the day of 1999. SECTION 6: Al] ordinances, resolutions, orders ox parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and. annulled. SECTION 7: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. GLENN JOHNSON HOMES /HARTFORD SUBDIVISION 2 ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE JUN 02 '99 14 23 FR CITY OF MERIDIAN 208 884 4259 TO 8871297 P.04i04 • SECTION 8: The Clexlc of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance, duly 1~ile a certified copy of this ordinance and a map prepared in a dra[~tsman manner plainly and clearly designating the boundaries of the City of Meridian, including the lands herein annexed, with the following officials of the County of Ada, State of Tdaho, to-wit: the lZecorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of tl,e State of Idaho, all in compliance with Tdaho Codc X63-2215 and §50-223. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of , 1999. APPROVED $Y THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of , 1999. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERIC msg\Z:\Work\M1Meridlan 15360M\Hartford Sub1AZ. ORO.WPD GLENN JOHNSON HOMES /HARTFORD SUBDIVISION 3 ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE ** TOTAL PAGE. 04 ** ~`,\~ ENGryy~,~~s H y~0 ,~~ SJ~~ti HUBBL~ENGINEERING, INC. ~ 9550 W. Bethel Court • Boise, Idaho 83709 TRANSMITTAL~LE~T,T~ E~ jR To: Y:;C..~ ~I i ltlVt.Nl~~ Attn: ~~~~ DATE (208) 322-8992 • Fax (208) 378-0329 Job No.: Project: WE ARE SENDING YOU: _ As Requested ~4 Attached _ Under Separate Cover, Via FOR YOUR: ~OUse Information _ Record Review and Comment _ Bidding _ Cost Estimating THE FOLLOWING: _ Prints _ SpecificaYwns _ Plans _ Shop Drawings ~ Samp es pp _ Copy of Letter ~(~ Q W~~ Copies Date Sheet No. Description _ ~ REMARKS: Copy To: _ With Encl. _ With Encl. _ With Encl. By: Signed: TOTAL MILES: TOTAL TIME: TIME DELIVERED: RECEIVED BY: • • HARTFORD SUBDIVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS Dated: June 12, 1994 Recorded: Instrument No.: PRELIMINARY DRAFT The undersigned, being the owners of the property hereinafter described, hereby adopt the following protective covenants in their entirety to apply to real property subdivided and contained in an estate to be known as HARTFORD SUBDIVISION, being a portion of Section, , T~N, R~W, B.M., Ada County, Idaho. HARTFORD SUBDIVISION is divided into single-family residential lots in compliance with the local and state regulations and laws. The following covenants shall run with the land and be in force and effect for thirty (30) years hereafter unless sooner terminated or ammended by agreement of the owners of seventy-five percent (75°~) of the lots in the estates and are as follows, to wit: (1) No building, fence, wall, structure, improvement or obstruction shall be placed or permitted to remain upon any part of said property unless a written request for approval thereof containing the plans and specifications thereof, including exterior color schemes having no offensive colors, has been approved in writing by a majority of the Architectural Committee or by its representative designated by a majority of the Committee. The approval of the Committee shall not be unreasonably withheld if the said plan and specifications are for improvements which are similar in general design and quality, and generally in harmony with the dwellings then located on said property. /~I00 r The floor area of a one story house in this estate shall be a minimum of~4~ square feet and the ground floor area of a split entry or a two-story house in this subdivision shall not be less than 1000 square feet having a total of a minimum of 1800 square feet. Dwelling structures existing prior to development of this subdivision shall be excluded from the square footage requirements but shall conform to all other requirements if remodeled at any time after these covenants have been filed and recorded. No residence shall be in excess of two stories. All area requirements shall be exclusive of the garage area and shall be well constructed of good quality material and workmanship. For the purpose of these covenants, eaves, steps, and open porches shall not be constructed to permit any portion of a building to encroach upon any other lot. All buildings shall be provided with architectural type shingle roofs or a similar aftemate approved by the Architectural Committee. The value of any new residence in the subdivision shall exceed $100,000.00 in value including the value of the land and improvements thereon, based on June, 1994 values. Fences shall not exceed the height of 6 feet on any lot and shall not exceed the height of 3 feet within 20 feet of any street without express approval of the Architectural Committee, and shall be properly finished and maintained. No fencing or obstructions shall be buiR within Nine Mile Creek so as to obstruct a 100-year storm; obstructions shall not be constructed below the crest of the bank. • • The location of fences, hedges, high plantings, obstructions or barriers shall be so situated as not to unreasonabty interfere with the enjoyment and use of neighboring properties and streets and shall not be allowed to constitute an undesirable or noxious or nuisance use. The determination of the Architectural Committee shall be binding on all parties as to whether an undesirable, noxious or nuisance use exists. At least ten (10) days prior to any construction being commenced, two sets of plans and specification shall be submitted to the Committee. Both sets of plans shall be marked with any pertinent comments, dated and receipt acknowledged by the Chairman of the Committee with one set returned to the owner within five (5) working days of receipt. (2) No building shall be located on any easement or lot nearer to the front lot line or nearer to the side and rear lot lines than the minimum building setback distances as set forth in the Ada County Zoning Ordinance, however, in any event no building shall be located on any lot nearer than Twenty (20) feet from the front lot line and fifteen (15) feet from the rear line nor nearer than five (5) feet per story to any side line. (3) Construction of any residences on the subdivision shall be diligently pursued after commencement thereof, to be completed within one (1) year, including landscaping. Each house shall have at least one ornamental tree of at least 2-inch caliper in the front yard. (4) No building shall be moved onto any of the lots in said subdivision. (5) No shack, tent, or trailer house shall be used within this subdivision for permanent or temporary living quarters. (6) Nothing of an offensive, dangerous, odorous, or noisy kind shall be conducted or carried on nor shall anything be done or permitted in said subdivision which may become an annoyance or nuisance to the other property owners in said subdivision. All lot owners shall plant grass or sod in yard areas and maintain to a maximum of 4 inches high. ('7) Keeping or raising of farm animals or poultry shall be prohibited. All dogs or cats or househokd pets kept on the premises shall be property fed and cared for and shall be adequatety fenced so as not to annoy or trespass upon the use of the property of others. Dogs shall not be allowed to run at large. Not more than two dogs, cats or other pets may be kept at one time, except that a litter of young may be kept until 8 or nine weeks old. No business shall be conducted on the above property that cannot be conducted within the building on the property. No signs shall be installed to advertise said business. No oil exploitation, development shall be permitted upon the lots in this subdivision. (8) Only one outbuilding per lot will be allowed. All outbuildings shall be constructed of good quality building material, completely finished and painted on the outside and shall be of good quality and character that will be in harmony with the other buikding on said property and must be approved by the Architectural Committee. (9) No building or trees shall be placed on any lot so as to obstruct direct sun light to the roof of any adjoining property owner in said subdivision. (10) Easements for installation and maintenance of utilities and drainage facilities are reserved for 2 • the areas as shown on the plat. Within these easements, no structure, planting or other material shall be placed or permitted to remain which may damage or interfere with the installation and maintenance of the utilities, or which may change the direction of flow of water through drainage channels in the easement. Easement areas and all improvements on them shall be maintained continuously by the owner of the krt, except for those improvements for which a public authority or utility is responsible. (11) All bathroom, sink and toilet facilities shall be located inside the dwelling house or other suitable appurtenant building, and shall be connected by underground pipe to the public sewer service. (12) No sign of any kind shall be displayed in public view on any building or buikJing site on said property of not more than six square feet advertising the property for sale or rent, or signs used by the developer to advertise the property during the construction and sales period. If a property is sold or rented, any sign relating thereto shall be removed immediately, except that the Declarant or its agent may post a "Sold" sign for a reasonable period following a sale. (13) No lot or building site included within this subdivision shall be used or maintained as dumping ground for waste material. Incinerators are not permitted. Receptacles for storage of trash, garbage etc. shall be maintained in a sanitary and clean condition. Parking of boats, trailer, motorcycles, trucks, truck campers and like equipment , or junk cars or other unsightly vehicles, shall not be allowed on any part of said property nor on public ways adjacent thereto excepting only within the confines of an enclosed garage, or other approved enclosure, and no portion of same may project beyond the enclosed area. Parking of automobiles or other vehicles on any part of the property shall be prohibited except within garages, carports, or other approved areas. The Architectural Committee shall be the sole and exclusive judged of approved parking areas. Their decision shall be final and binding. No machinery, building equipment or material shall be stored upon site until the Grantee is ready and able to commence the construction with respect to such building upon which such building material shall be placed within the property line of such building site upon which the structure is to be erected. (14) Installation of radio and\ortelevision antenna is prohibited outside any building without written permission from Architectural Committee. (15) These covenants shall run with the land and shall be binding on all persons owning under them for a period of thirty (30) years from the date of the recording hereof, after which time such covenants shall be automatically extended for successive periods often (10) years, unless at any time after the initial recording of this instrument, an instrument signed by the owners of 75°~6 of the land of the subdivision has been recorded agreeing to change or terminate said covenants in whole or in part. (16) Enforcement against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate any covenant herein, after ten (10) days notice thereof served in writing on the offending party, shall be served by the Home Owners Association for said subdivision either at law or equity. In the event of a judgement against any person for such violation, the Court may award injunction against the offending party. Any owner, or the owner of any recorded mortgage upon any part of said property, shall have the right to enforce, by any proceeding at law or in equity, any or all restrictions, conditions, covenants, reservations, liens and charge now or hereafter imposed by the provisions of this Declaration. Failure by any owner to enforce any covenants or restrictions herein contained shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. • (1~ A committee with a minimum of two persons shall act as an architectural design committee and shall, prior to any new construction in the subdivision, be fumished~with detailed plans of any proposed building to be located in said subdivision and shall be allowed fifteen days to review said plans, drawings, and specifications. If said Committee shall approve of the proposed building, or any modification or aftemations thereof, they shall so indicate and their approval shall be construed as full compliance with the provisions of Paragraph 1 of the original Covenants, said Committee shall have sole discretion to determine what shall be substantial compliance with said covenants. No buildings shall occupy any portion of said subdivision without the approval of said committee. The initial committee shall consist of the following: 1. Ray Patel 2. Kay Patel 3. Rick Thurber A Majority of said committee is empowered to act for the committee. In the event any member of the committee is unable to act or fails or desires not to act, the remaining committee members shall appoint an owner of a lot in said subdivision to serve on said committee, all of who will serve without compensation. (18) Invalidation of any one of these covenants shall in no way affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. (19) A Homeowners' Association shall be duly formed by the developers. This association, in the form of anon-profit Corporation, will be for the propose of owning, maintaining and operating an irrigation distribution system for the subdivision and maintain common areas as delineated on the plat. Membership in this Homeowners' Association shall be mandatory and continuous by all current and future property owners of the subdivision, which association be dedicated to the welfare of all property owners in the HARTFORD SUBDIVISION. In Witness Whereof, we, the undersigned owners the property in the HARTFORD SUBDIVISION have hereunto set our hands on this day of , 1994. 4 • • STATE OF IDAHO) ss. COUNTY OF ADA ) On this day of , 1994, before me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State Of Idaho, personally appeared and and acknowledged to me that they executed the within instrument for and in behalf of said Corporations. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year in this certficate first above written. Notary Public of Idaho Residing at Boise, Idaho 5 ORDINANCE NO.~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 35, T.4N. , R.1W. , B.M. , ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to annex to the said City real property which is described in Section 1 below: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the real property described as: A portion of the South half of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 35, T.4N., R.1W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the corner common to Sections 2 and 3, T.3N., R.1W., and Sections 34 and 35, T.4N., R1W., B.M., thence North 00°53'34" East, 347.44 feet along the West boundary of said Section 35 to a point; thence South 80°11'00" East, 183.85 feet to a point; thence North 00°53'34" East, 123.21 feet to a point; thence North 89°14'23" West, 181.63 feet to a point on the West boundary of said Section 35; thence along said West boundary North 00°53'34" East, 219.14 feet to the S-S 1/64 corner; thence South 89°14'23" East, 1319.17 feet to the C-S-SW 1/64 corner; thence South 00°40'05" West, 660.43 feet to the W 1/16 corner common to said Sections 35 and 2; thence North 89°15'30" West, 1321.76 feet to the point of beginning. is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and shall be zoned R-4 Residential; that the annexation and zoning is subject to the MERIDIAN A ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - VIJYA LARMI/HARTFORD Page 1 • • conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for annexation and zoning. Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de- annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements: a. That the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer and resolve how the water and sewer mains will serve the land. b. That the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan adopted January 4, 1994. c. That, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, K, L of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian and other matters. d. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, 11-9-605 M. which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways, and 11-9-606 B 14. which pertains to pressurized irrigation. e. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind the Applicant, the titled owners, and their assigns. f. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. Section 3 . That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy of the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, Ada .County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission within ten (10) days following the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - VIJYA LAXMI/HARTFORD page 2 • PASSED by the City Council and approved b the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho., this 2®"day of September, 1994. APPROVED: R -- GRANT P. KI S RD ATTEST : ~ -. .,, ~.~,; ,,;,' :_, ;~ ~ ?~• -R Jam.: "'w~ '4 P..'. ,~j m&zsr ~i •a~ Tj ~ v y'i WILLIAM G. BERG, J - CITY CLERK '~ ~ `~~`~' r,, sr~a ~~ µ^ `~ -~ f }'r STATE OF IDAHO ) ""~. ~~• '=~ County of Ada, ) I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 35, T.4N., R.1W., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE."; passed as Ordinance No. ~ ~~? by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the 2~ ~ day of September, 1994, as the same appears in my office. DATED this 2~ ~ day of September, 1994. . ~~ City Clerk, City ~ ~eridian Ada County, Idaho ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - VIJYA LAXMI/SARTFORD Page 3 • • STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada, ) Sept. On this 20th day of -d~x~, 1994, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for. said State, personally appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. a17' z., ~ r. ~ ": ,~ s n `~ .~- SEAL ~ ~:"~.. - N ;~, ~-• 1~ ~; ,, ., e ; ~ _,_ ~ ;; is ,~ 44`, ',I~ ~ : ~1p11 ~,, 1109 : ~U Y Public for Idaho ing at Meridian, Idaho emission Expires nR~n~~~aa ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - VIJYA LAXMI/HARTFORD Page 4 N. Fb°53.34 /~ ,~ = EZIR.I~ ~ / E ~,~ , , -~ ', 34.44 , ~„ '~ -„ ~' N.~°53 34~ ; '~ 'I E 123,2(' I~~, , / ;' ,C ;, i ,'~ ~ ~„ { ~ ~l S ~ ' ~ ~ Z ~ '~~ ,~~ ~Z w ~ ~ ; ~~ '~ ~ ~ ~~ , ~ ,~ , ;,, w ,,, ,.~ ~ ~ , , ~` S'` :J ~ ~ ; ~ -~ ~, ;,~ ;,~ ~,~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ , , ,.m~r~- ~°40'05°165( GLt>.43 ,. ~ ... i Mtl.~ 11 -- _ - ~1 ~~ ,„ ~; ~ ,,; `~ ' ~ ; ,,; ~, ~~,; ~~~, ,~, , ,. , ~, ,,, ,o ; ,, g , ;; - -,~ ,„ ----------- ------ -~ , MAY 13 '94 10~=44 • ~ PAGE.001 `~ gxGrpc° ~,Q `~ ~~MJ:~~L~,~NG~MIE~RIIV~, INC. y 9560 Bethel Ctxsrt • Boise, kieho 83709 209/9?2-8992 ~ Fax 2081~~8~3.29 Post-it"' Fax Alptip 76F1 ~ w ra r F~ Goloepl. ~. Pho~a # pppr~ # fax A~ Fax • ti.+~l~.,iii:LY,tG[iGitttti .. ~~~ ~ ~ ~r~~}. . M~d~n, Idaho 83142 ` ~ . ~ ~ : ~ ~ _ ~ .:...~ ~ ... , .. .. . ~ ~ AEC_~~ E .. ~ ~ _ . , ... .... . RE: ~ H~rtfard ~ k're~mmary lylat ~ - , _ ....................... . ~l~Y.1=.3 ~ 1994 l~tr leis, stir: ~ ~ ~. CITY OF MIERIDIAN . In revi~ dae ~ia~vr~ ~sion preiiminaxy plat I ham found errors ~ t#rc plat nth shvwn vn t~ face 8f txte pier. The trt>~ below re#lect the way m which t2ie plat notes shatrld react, 1. Ail lots are siagie t~ify residcatlal kats, except for Lot 1, Block 1, Lots 1,16 and 31, Black 2 and Lot 1, Block 4 whidt ate deslgrtated as trommau area Icrts tlxat are vWned artrl maiatained by t~ l~oectcown~ association. 5, All Iat lints oomman by a public right-o# w$y Iiue ltar-e a 14 foal wide perm~aasen# public utilities, streaei right, dt'aiaage and in~gation catemcrtt, ea~cept as noted otherwise. The ebow+c cArr+ecti+ous are being m~3e to the Hartford Subdivisiaaz preliminary plat, and tropics of tlte~ re~risad plat w~'1I be de~t'ed m ycau office. Plea$e accept my apoit~ies €or agy inconvenience this inay Dave d you, and thsnac yet for your time. Sincerely, Tracey L. Pcr~s Asst. Ptcr~ect C~rdir~ts~r ©c. Gaty.Snahit, P,E~ C'ity F..ngmeer wl~ Clerk i:11t)$1.itr ~* TGTRL PRGE.061 ** • • Meridian Planning & Zoning May 31, 1994 Page 30 waste and there are occasionally odors that come out of that treatment process. That is all I have, do you have any other questions, I would be happy to answer them. Rountree: You talked about the plant situation and how to (inaudible) of buyer beware, do you have any suggestions other than it being in the official record and a notation on the plat once it is approved, an item in the restrictive covenants. Smith: I don't have any suggestions, I know my standing up here and saying this is not going to (inaudible) from taking place, but I wanted to say it anyway. Rountree: Any questions? Shearer: I move that we have the City Attorney prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law for this project. Hepper: Second Rountree: It has been moved and seconded to have findings of fact and conclusions prepared, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #5: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING 1~IITM~A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HARTFORD SUBDIVISION, 62 LOTS BY VIJYA LAXMfi DEVELOPMENT AND NUBBLE ENGINEERING: Rountree: I will now open the public hearing, anyone hear from the applicant? Jim Merkle, 9550 Bethel Court, Boise; was sworn by the City Attorney. Merkle: Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, I apologize for my earlier absence. In my packet I did not receive ACHD's final comments and they have changed somewhat. I would, like to pass them out to you if I could. You could turn to the second to the last page, it kind of shows the proximity of this particular proposal in relationship to the surrounding area. This proposal is located at the northeast corner of Ustick and Ten Mile road, right across the street from your sewage treatment plant. This application is for 20 acre annexation and R-4 zoning with a preliminary plat which includes 57 lots. This is about 2.9 lots per acre. Access to this subdivision is proposed from Ustick road and the entrance street will align in accordance with the Candlelight subdivisions future access road to Ustick. We are proposing a stub street to the east, at the north east corner as shown on the preliminary plat. This will provide vehicular access to the east in the future • • Meridian Planning & Zoning May 31, 1994 Page 31 whenever that particular landowner and if he decides to develop. And also provide sewer service to the area to the east. We met with ACRD on May 20th regarding this proposal and they approved it as proposed and that is what the packet 1 gave will include. All the street in the subdivision will be built to the Highway District Standards with 50 foot of right of way, 36 foot streets and 5 foot sidewalks as required by the City of Meridian. Water will be extended to the subdivision from existing lines in Ustick Road. Regarding the sewer which Mr. Smith spoke to earlier, we are proposing to provide sewer to this subdivision and probably to all the property on the south side of Five Mile Drain and north of Ustick which right now are not severable via a lift station, sewage lift station located on the northeast corner of this subdivision and that will either be shown in one of 3 locations. In this location as shown or possibly in this location whichever is more practical when we get to the final design period. This sewer lift station will also serve the property to the east of this development. A lift station in my opinion is necessary in this instance because of the City's existing Five Mite Trunk sewer which is located on the north side of the drain. Let me tum this over for you, The highlighted area indicates the (inaudible) Five Mile Drain located in this area right there. The City's Five Mile Trunk Sewer is on the north side of that drain this proposal is on the south side of the drain. The existing sewer on the north side is not deep enough to gravity sewer underneath the drain and into it. It was installed some 15 years ago and for whatever reason it was not put as low as it needs to be for this particular property to serve it. One idea also to get around a lift station is possibly to raise the sewer up and suspend it across the middle of the drain, I have seen that done in some instances. In this case we have talked to Nampa Meridian Irrigation district and they are not keen on that idea. In fact they want a certain amount of clearance above the high water mark of the drain. Which in this case because of the flood way, flood plain would put that so high that you could not serve the area to the south. So the only other way vwuld be by a lift station. If that was the alternative which is acceptable to the City I would recommend that everybody on the south side of the drain that is in the sane predicament we are get together and go in on it. So, there is only one crossing, one facility to maintain instead of numerous. We are proposing pressurized irrigation per the City's wishes in this proposed subdivision. A couple of things I would like to address in Mr. Smith's comments, item #1, I would like to comment we will either comply with or in writing respond to each and everyone of his and Ms. Stiles comments. However I would like to go through them one by one, item #1 and 2 we can provide that information Gary requested in both of those items. Item 3, is a comment, item 3 recommends include the lot and existing house as part of the subdivision. As you can see the out parcel is part of the annexation request but is not part of the preliminary plat request, however, we will modify the preliminary plat to include that house and that lot into the subdivision. However, the access for that particular house will continue we are proposing to be from Ten Mile road. When we, and you can look at this in the ACHD comments when we addressed that with them they have no problem with that particular hpuse to have access on Ustick. Also, he says provide continuation of street improvements across the frontage. We will need to dedicate the i • Meridian Planning & Zoning May 31, 1994 Page 32 right of way and provide the improvements and the landscape buffer if we can. Item #4, he wants to talk about the Five Mile Creek, the topography on the other side that I showed you shows where the Five Mile Creek is located. The property on both sides of the drain is owned by the same property owner to the north of us. Item #5, He asked about an above creek crossing for sanitary sewer, I have already addressed that and that is why we are proposing a lift station. Item #6, the irrigation ditch which crosses the project will be piped and also utilized in the pressurized irrigation system for the subdivision. Item 7 through 10 these items will be provided to Mr. Smith for his information and his files. Regarding item 11 and Gary already spoke to this regarding the previous application. The applicant is aware of the vicinity of sewage treatment plant, and he will take precautions whether by a note on the plat or in the covenants. Take precautions to ensure potential residents are aware of its proximity. And I'm not sure we can do much more than that. The City's comprehensive plan for this particular area shows here is the piece of property right here, here is the treatment plant your comprehensive plan which was just adopted by the City identifies this whole area as single family residential and that is what vue are proposing. Regarding the comments in your packet from Shari Stiles, the Planning & Zoning Administrator, her first comment Block 2 is over 1000 feet long, that is correct we will be applying for a variance. One way to get rid of the requirement of a variance would be to provide a stub street. We can't really provide a stub street anywhere along here it isn't practical, it is just a sliver of ground (inaudible). If we do provide a stub street it would be all the way to the west. (Inaudible) that would still leave us in excess of 1000 feet so it is the applicants intention to before Council submit for a variance request. We are not proposing a stub .street to the north anywhere along that whole vicinity and the reasons being that particular triangular piece is kind of a no man's land, if that particular landowners wants to sell to a developer and they come in and develop that he can easily bring a street in off Ten Mile Road and culdesac. Meet the requirements of the maximum length of a culdesac set by the City and provide lots off that culdesac without having an access from us. We are providing a pedestrian access at the east end of the subdivision which would connect to your proposed pathway plan. That access would be over the top of the sewer lot. Again in the Highway Districts comments they address that and they are not requiring, they did not say yes or no they just said they are not requiring that stub street to the north. Item 2, the existing house I have addressed, it is in the annexation it is not shown on the preliminary plat, but we are modifying that to include that and you can make that a condition of the approval. Item 3, which she talks about direct lot access to Ten Mile Road and Ustick, we will put the note on the plat stating that it is prohibited to Ustick but we will leave that one particular lot on Ten Mile to have access on Ten Mile Road which I have already addressed. Items 3 through 10 we will provide Shari with a response to each of those items for her record in writing. In conclusion I request that you approve this annexation and preliminary plat application this evening and if you have any questions I will be glad to try and answer them. • • Meridian Planning & Zoning May 31, 1994 Page 33 Shearer: Don't we have a sewer line in Ten Mile Road? Merkle: Not in this vicinity, your sewer line comes, everything to the south of Ustick Road I believe in your facility plan drains into the Nine Mile Trunk Line which is further to the south and west. We even tried to run a line back from about a 1/4 west of this back up Ustick and into this project to maybe possibly drain it into there so we could eliminate the lift station, but as you can see Ustick Road down to the north side of this property there is about 8 feet of (inaudible). So we possibly could get this piece but in no way could we gravity this piece. So, if you are going to have a lift station if that is the only option it vuould be best to do it all. Rountree: Any other questions? Hepper: Yes, I wanted to know more about the landscaping along Ten Mile and Ustick. Merkle: I believe the applicant is proposing to do a berm and a fence as is typical further down Ten Mile like Parkwood Meadows and possibly what is down Ustick at Fieldstone Meadows which is a berm and a fence at the back of the berm to be continuous down the street so we don't have a hodge podge of different ideas. Hepper: Okay, and that would be on both streets, Ustick and Ten Mile? Merkle: Yes, sir, except for where the access from that existing house would remain to Ten Mile Road. The berm would be down to level for that particular lot. One good point that staff brought up was including that piece into the preliminary plat let's us provide city water and sewer to it which we were not planning on before but that is one benefit of doing that. We will comply with that. Rountree: Thank You, anyone else wish to testify on this proposal? John Schaffer, 2788 West Ustick Road, was swum by the City Attorney. Schaffer: The property owner to the east of this proposed subdivision, I do not at this time propose to develop the property. I guess the question, understanding Jim, didn't you say there was going to be an access to Ten Mile Road. Rountree: If you direct the questions to us please. Schaffer: There was a statement made, I didn't catch it whether there is going to be an access road to Ten Mile. Something about a piece of property that held out. • • Meridian Planning & Zoning May 31, 1994 Page 34 Rountree: The existing home that is on Ten Mile will access Ten Mile but there will not be an access on Ten Mile. Schaffer: I would request that maybe looking into an access on Ten Mile Road since this subdivision would only have one access to Ustick for an exit. Again I would request that a barrier be provided to prevent foot traffic from the subdivision to the east from the access road for future development. And the irrigation system, there was a comment made about irrigation and I apologize I didn't pick that up. Is the existing irrigation water going to be used for irrigation by pressurized system and how is this proposed to be implemented with water usage and rights. And one other question, the sewage pump system will there be some type of retaining barrier or something of that nature in case of failure of this pump and who will maintain this pump after it is taken over, the city requirement or who is responsible for this. Those are all the questions I have. Rountree: Anyone else wishing to testify? Ray Wilder, 3340 North Ten Mile Road, was sworn by the City Attorney. Wilder: This stub street that he was talking about at the end of this field right here that field, by the time they take the right of way for the drain ditch off of there that field only amounts to about an acre and a half is all there is too in that field. It is just a little pie shaped field there. t can't see where a stub street would go to, just right into the drain ditch, there is no place for it to go. And I have lived out there on that corner for 37 years and I have, when they first built the sewer plant I was against the sewer plant when they built it. They tried to buy our place to put the sewer plant on, I was against it then, but it is not bad, I don't smell it. Then a couple of years ago when Candlelight went I came up here and they told me how beautiful it was going to be and I told them I was going to make my own berm on my own side of the road which I did one winter. I dumped manure over the fence and made a nice looking berm. And it smelled worse than the sewer plant. Last year we had over 1100 head on this place and I didn't want to live near that. But you can't live on the corner of Ustick and Ten Mile with 1100 head of cattle I will grant you that. Every night you go to bed you worry about many you are going to have lost before morning comes. And this water system now when it is all done I don't know who is going to use the water, we haven't used the water for 30 days, (inaudible) and this is the first time in our life we have had water. the Cairns place and Fieldstone that all has no water to it, I think we should have a new schedule made out. These people that have the 5 acre tracts should take it one or two days a week and run it across their place so they will get their use out of it. We are having trouble getting rid of the water right now, because Larry ended up with the drain ditch on his place and this water is not being used. This stub street that goes into that tittle place, if you went out and looked it is only, there isn't anything there. I mean it would just run right smack into a drain ditch bank is where it • • Meridian Planning & Zoning May 31, 1994 Page 35 would go. But as far as the sewer, the only time the sewer smells I think is when the sewer plant has a little accident and they have had one or 2 over the years. That is all I needed to say. Rountree: Thank you, anyone else wishing to testify? Tammy Schaffer, 2788 West Ustick Road, was sworn by the City Attorney. Schaffer: I just have a small comment to make, we were here a couple of years ago when Fieldstone and Candlelight were getting started and I don't recall the developers addressing the schools, and I didn't hear any of that tonight. I am just concerned that Linder Elementary is going to be mighty crowded with all the development going on. I just wanted to enter one little comment, some little old lady being concerned about the schools being over run with new students. These type of houses are perfect for the young families to move into. I suspect there will be lots of young people there. That is it, thank you. Rountree: Anyone else wish to testify, Mr. Merkle will you address some of the questions? Merkle: Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, I would like to address a few of these items I jotted down. We are proposing to provide pressurized irrigation utilizing existing water that crosses the property. I think that is in the best interest of the City and I think we have come to agreement on that. The sewer lift station, Mr. Schaffer had a comment about how the sewage would be stored if the pump went down or whatever. If this lift station is the solution that the City and the applicant can come to the meeting of minds on, typically they do provide an underground wet well for storage and there is a duel pump system one kicks on and one kicks off. There probably is an occasion when they will both be down but the sewer system is maintained by the City of Meridian, if we come to agreement with Mr. Smith. Regarding the issues on the schools, every application comes through and we get this typical letter from the Meridian School District and it is true schools are over crowded I don't know if 1 have the answer or if my applicant have the answer. However, I do know there is talk of a bond issue voting on around a year from now possibly, I'm not sure. Talk about transfer tax or impact fees, the applicant would be in support of those issues. We are not proposing a school site for this site, but there are other ways to mitigate the impacts. I am not sure if we will find the solution here tonight. That is all I have for those issues. Rountree: How about fencing the stub street to the east? Merkle: I think that is acceptable, it is reasonable he doesn't want any foot traffic across there, it is reasonable. • • Meridian Planning & Zoning May 31, 1994 Page 36 Rountree: Any other questions? Thanks Jim, anyone else wish to testify? Seeing none I will close the public hearing. Discussion, comments, recommendations. Nobody wants to make a motion. Shearer: 1 move we have the Attorney prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law for this project. Hepper: Second Rountree: It has been moved and seconded that wee have findings of facts and conclusions prepared, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All yea ITEM #6: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR CHAMBERLAIN ESTATES NO. 2, 28 LOTS BY HOWELL CONSTRUCTION AND RUBBLE ENGINEERING: Rountree: twill now open the public hearing, someone from the applicant. (End of Tape) Jim Merkle, 9550 Bethel Court, was swum by the City Attorney. Merkle: I am here this evening on behalf of Kevin Howell the applicant. Again I have the Highway District's comments for your packet which shows a little map on it for the vicinity of the project. The second or third to last page kind of shows a vicinity map for you to look at. This application is located about a 1000 feet south of Ustick Road on the east side of Locust Grove. This is just directly north of the Chamberlain Estates subdivision which is an approved subdivision just beginning construction. This application is for annexation R- 8zoning on 9.7 acres with 28 lot preliminary plat, this provides a density of 2.9 lots per acre. Which is well under the R-8 zoning, the reason for the R-8 request is the lot width requirement, your R-4 zoning requires 80 and we have some deep lots here and we want to keep the widths down to 70 or below and still have the lot square footage of an R-4 and the density of an R-4 but have an R-8 zoning to provide us with some relief on the width of the lots. The applicant is proposing home sizes with a minimum of 1300 square feet which is similar to what was approved on Chamberlain Estates. Access to the subdivision will be from a future street, which is not constructed yet in Chamberlain Estates at the southeast corner. Also, 2 stub streets are proposed, one to the north, one to the east. Also the culdesac at the west end will have right of way that touches the adjacent right of way so that in the event that the property to the north develops they can take that road up • . Meridian Planning & Zoning June 14, 1994 Page 10 ITEM #10: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR STACIE YBARRA ACCESSORY USE PERMIT: Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I make a motion that the Meridian Planning 8~ Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these findings of facts and conclusions. Alidjani: Second Johnson: It is moved and second to approve the findings of facts as prepared by the City Attorney, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Alidjani -Aye, Shearer -Aye, Rountree -Aye, Hepper -Aye MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Johnson: Decision for the Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I move that the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission hereby approve the accessory use permit requested by the applicant for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law. Shearer: Second Johnson: It is moved and second to pass on the decision as prepared by the City Attorney, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: Atl Yea ITEM #11: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR HARTFORD SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT: Alidjani: I have some changes, there is some typing errors in the decision andrecommendationn area. The last page, page 15, last paragraph (inaudible). Johnson: Any other changes? Rountree: Item #17 is a "net" "not". Johnson: Any other changes? I will entertain a motion for approval of the findings of fact. Shearer: Mr. Chairman, I move the Planning & Zoning Commission hereby adopt and • • Meridian Planning & Zoning June 14, 1994 Page 11 approve these findings of fact andconclusionss of law. Alidjani: Second Johnson: Moved and seconded to approve the findings of fact and conclusions of law with the 2 typos mentioned, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Hepper -Aye, Rountree -Aye, Shearer -Aye, Alidjani -Aye MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Johnson: Decision or recommendation to the City Council. Shearer. 1 move the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the annex_ ation and zoning as stated above for the property described in the application with the conclusions set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law. And that if the conditions are not met that the property be de-annexed. Rountree: Second Johnson: Moved and second to pass a recommendation onto the City Council as stated, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #12: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR CHAMBERLAIN ESTATES NO.2 ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT: Alidjani: 1 have a change on page 14, the same word, it should be City Council of the City of Meridian instead of City Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian. Johnson: Any others? Any discussion? Anybody care to make a recommendation? Alidjani: Mr. Chairman, I make a motion that the Planning & Zoning Commission hereby adopt and approve these findings of fact. Shearer: Second Johnson: We have a motion with a second to approve the findings of fact and conclusions of law for Chamberlain Estates No. 2, roll call vote. • Meridian Planning & Zoning June 14, 1994 Page 14 MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Johnson: Decision or recommendation to the City Council. U Hepper: Mr. Chairman, I move the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the annexation and zoning as stated above for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law. And that if the conditions are not met that the property be de-annexed. Rountree: Second Johnson: We have a motion and a second to approve the decision or recommendation as written, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Johnson: Now we need to address those preliminary plats. Rountree: As a group? Johnson: If you wish. Rountree: i have a question for Gary Smith and Shari Stiles before we do. Have your concerns with Hartford, Chamberlain Estates, Fawcett's Meadows and Ramble Wood preliminary plats been addressed by the Developers to your satisfaction? Smith: The Hartford is the subdivision at the (inaudible) comer of Ten Mile and Ustick. I think the only thing that still is a question in my mind is how exactly is that going to be sewered. I talked to the property owner to the west side of Ten Mile Road north of Ustick came into my office a week or so ago and was interested in the sewering of that property also. And I haven't. had as chance to talk to Mr. Merkle at Hubble Engineering but I did want to pursue the possibility of constructing a sewer along the south side of Five Mite Creek from where the interceptor crosses the Nine Mile interceptor crosses Five Mile Creek. To see if we can get severer back up that way to serve this property. I think this gentleman to the west was agreeable to having a sewer line constructed along there. Particularly of course it could serve part of his property. But, if everything else doesn't work then the lift station is the last alternative. If we have to go to a lift station I want to be sure it is placed somewhere along there is that is going to serve all the property so we don't have 2 lift stations. But t guess that is the only gray area that I have with Hartford. I think the other 2 Chamberlain and Fawcett's Meadows No. 2 all those items are easily • • Meridian Planning & Zoning June 14, 1994 Page 15 addressed. Rountree: And Ramble Wood? Smith: Same thing, that would sewer from Hartford. And they would need to cross, I think the name of the gentleman that lives there is Mr. Schaffer, they would need to cross his property with a sewer line. 1 think all of those properties along there have to be looked at as a unit for sewer service. Hopeful they can all sewer to the west to a point. That is about all I remember. Johnson: Do you have anything to add Shari Stiles? Stiles: Mr. Chairman, Commissioners, the only thing really that is in common for all of these is that they v~rould require a development agreement that v~uld address all of our concerns and those of the agencies. including the bike paths and landscaping, license agreement with Nampa Meridian Irrigation District and similar things that are called out in the findings. Johnson: How are we doing with development agreements, do we have some in force now? Stiles: No we do not. Johnson: We still don't have any in force, do we have some pending? Stiles: Yes, several. Johnson: I thought we did but I had never seen a final one yet. Anyone else have any concerns on any of the 4 preliminary plats we are addressing here. In that case I will entertain a motion. Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I move that we table and recommendation on Hartford and Ramble Wood subdivision until the situation with the sewering of those properties is resolved and scheduling that to our next regularly scheduled meeting July 12, 1994. Shearer: Second Johnson: Any discussion on the motion? Alidjani: I have a concern, I see Gary's concern, is there a way we can approve this preliminary plat within the condition of the development agreement plus the concern that • Meridian Planning & Zoning June 14, 1994 Page 16 Gary has either for a sewer line or the lift station. Because if we table it now what kind of answer are we going to have later? Rountree: Well we pass onto the City Council something certain as opposed to something in the air that at this point they don't know if they are talking about one or more lift stations or being able to sewer across some other properties, apparently there are some options there. Alidjani: I understand that, but my concerns are is there enough time between now and until they go in front of City Council that they can take care of those. Rountree: They probably could have taken care of it before. It was a problem at the last meeting. Johnson: Is there any other discussion? Is that the end of the comments from staff and the Commission. Smith: Mr. Chairman, Commission members,( End of Tape) as far as passing on a specific recommendation to City Council and I appreciate what Commissioner Alidjani is saying, it hasn't been resolved how that would be sewered or where the lift station might be placed, but I don't think there is a problem with sewering it so it would just be a matter of one or the other. Of course it is the Commissioners decision as to how you want to pass this along to the City Council. I am certainly not promoting speeding up any of these developments because we have a lot of them to do, but in the same breath I don't know, I think a decision can be reached in a short period of time with the developer and engineer as to how these projects can be sewered. Rountree: Given the options you have available to sewer the properties do those options change the platting in terms of where a lift station may be located and the publics opportunity to comment on that versus no lift station and having to sewer across another property and the publics opportunity to comment on that? Smith: On Ramble- Wood it is not going to effect that one because it is going to sewer into Hartford. The sewering of Hartford it could affect, there could be a slight modification of the lot arrangement there. The sewer line may exit the subdivision as presently shown, it may go to the northwest corner and exit (inaudible) it would possibly get into an easement adjacent to the subdivision boundary. I don't remember the exact layout of the land out there but I think the northwest corner of that project is the lowest area and so the sewer would probably come down the street, the most northern east-west street and exit the subdivision through a common area lot similar to what happened on Park Wood Meadows on Ten Mile road south of there. And get into a lift station at that point or cross • • Meridian Planning & Zoning June 14, 1994 Page 17 Ten Mile Road into the property adjacent thereto and continue onto the west. I don't think there would be, I guess it is kind of a round about long ansvuer, but I don't think there would be a sign cant change in the lot arrangement on Hartford regardless of where the lift station may be or the sewer line may exit the subdivision. tt won't exit the subdivision in a public right of way, but it would have to exit through a common lot area. Johnson: Gary, are you basically saying since our last tabling of this you haven't had any specific discussion with the developer regarding the sewer? Smith: I don't think so other than the property owner from across the street that came in. Johnson: We are under advisement from the City Council and the Mayor you know that if the time schedules aren't met the items addressed haven't been addressed by the time of the meeting the 11th hour salvage thing is a thing of the past. If the "i's" aren't dotted and the '~'s" aren't crossed we are not going to proceed and that is basically the guidance we are under at this point because we have plenty to do as you said. Leniency is not going to be as prevalent as it was in the past. Shearer: Mr. Chairman, I missed something on this Ramble Wood, it seems like at the last meeting that the plat shower! no road to the east to the property to the east of it and I think there was something in ACRD that they said they wanted a road to the east, wasn't there. I have not seen anything where they changed it Johnson: Are you aware of anything on that? Stiles: Mr. Chairman, Commissioners, ACRD commented that if the City requires a access to the east for sewer service purposes they would have no problem with that, but they wouldn't require it. Shearer. It was us that was requiring that then. We have been 2 or 3 weeks since these were up before us last time and the things that were addressed at the last meeting evidently haven't been addressed. I can't feel sorry for these guys going back through it, they know there is a problem and you thing they would work it out with City staff and be ready to go. Johnson: Thanks Shari I appreciate it. There is a motion, is there any further discussion, we have a second also. Hearing none we will vote on Charlie Rountree's motion, alt those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I make a motion that we pass on a favorable recommendation • Meridian Planning & Zoning June 14, 1994 Page 18 to the City Council for preliminary plats on Chamberlain Estates and Fawcett's Meadows No. 2. Shearer: Second Johnson: Moved and seconded to pass on a favorable recommendation for the preliminary plats as addressed by Commissioner Rountree, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #15: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING FOR E. L. BEWS BY E. L. BEWS AND WAYNE FORREY: Johnson: I will now open the public hearing, if there is an applicant or someone representing the applicant that vrrould like to come forward at this time please do so. Wayne Forrey, 52 East Franklin Road, was sworn by the City Attorney. Forrey: Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission I am here tonight representing Edward and Shirley Bews the owners of the Bews property which is generally east of the Eagle Road Interchange, which would be on the north side of the Interstate between the Interstate and Franklin Road. I have a vicinity map I would like to hand out. The subject property on the transparency is shown in green that is the property owned by Ed and Shirley Bews. I# is immediately east of the proposed St. Luke's Hospital site which is on the east side of North Eagle Road. The brown that you see on that transparency is the Department of Transportation Interstate right of way, Interstate 84. Several years ago Ed Bews recorded a plan called Farmington Estates Subdivision and that is located on this property, it has been recorded but never constructed. All of that green area show the 75 acre Bews ownership but the olive colored portion there is the Farmington Estates plat, again never constructed. Ed believes and I do too now that we have had a chance to do some master planning with St. Luke's Hospital that subdivision would not be compatible with the proposed medial campus envisioned for that site. So, it is Mr. Bevis desire to vacate that plat and work it out with any of the agencies that are involved. One thing that would not be vacated is the well lot. There is a developed municipal quality v~ll on the property and that well lot would remain so that there is a possibility of getting that to the City. Johnson: When did that go through the County? Forrey: I am thinking 1976 -1978 somewhere in there. The request of Mr. Bews for Mixed Planned Use Development complies with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, but right now • • MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION JULY 12. 1994 The regular meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairman Jim Johnson at 7:30 P.M.: Members Present: Charlie Rountree, Jim Shearer, Tim Hepper, Moe Alidjani: Others Present: Will Berg, Wayne Crookston, Gary Smith, Shari Stiles, Mike Wewers, Tom Vensley, Linda Wyatt, Thelma and Richard Bross, Aaron Sharp, Rich Allison, Raleigh Hawe, Craig Cavanaugh, Manuel daRosa, Doug Huliek, Deborah Fisher, Terry Swanly, Nanette Miller, Rob and Shelly Powers, Andy Carter, Robin Childers, Janine Weavers, Pat Nations, Randy Winwood, Bonnie Ferguison, Randy Ferguison, Patricia Sims, Pamela Walsh, David Stuart, Rex Larsen, Sharon Cummons, Gloria Lacy, Kanioly Hartroni, jim Merkle, Ted Hutchinson, Mike Shrewsberry, Mike Wardle, Jim Rees, Joe Glaisyer, Elizabeth Gwen, Dick Ross, Jay Jones, Tom Densley, Don Brian, Becky Bowcutt, Andy Carter, Craig Caven, Bart Ballentine, Randy Gwenwood, Lawrence Rackham, Lloyd Bone, Ruth Hunter, Susan Kelly, Jim Ballentine, Chuck Lee, Karrey Wase, Doug Danielson, Christine Mace, Troy Green, Stewart Green, Erma Lida, Lloyd Gerber, Ron Walsh, Rob Powers, James Jones: Johnson: Before we get into anything I might mention that we have 17 items, if you don't have an agenda, the first few items will probably go fairly quickly with no promises there. So, if you are here for a later item, you might want to get some fresh air it is up to you. We basically filled all the seats its like, we can accomodate only so many people. MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING HELD JUNE 23, 1994: Johnson: Are there any additions, corrections or deletions? Alidjani: Mr. Chairman I make a motion that we approve the special meeting held June 23, 1994. Shearer: Second Johnson: Moved and seconded to approve the minutes as written, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #1: TABLED AT JUNE 14, 1994: HARTFORD SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT BY VIJYA LAXMI DEVELOLPMENT AND RUBBLE ENGINEERING: Johnson:. We tabled this item, is there a representative here for the Applicant that might come forward and address the Commission. • • Meridian Planning & Zoning July 12, 1994 Page 2 Merkle: Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, my recollection of the issue was whether there was a lift station or a gravity sewer was what the hold up on the preliminary plat was. The annexation and findings were passed on with a favorable recommendation. You might want to ask Gary, we have met with him and provided him information on grade and what not and I think we have come up with a solution and Gary could probably answer your question on what we are going to do on that, so you might want to ask him. Johnson: Any questions of Mr. Merkle? Mr. Smith, would you like to comment on that please? Smith: Mr. Chairman, Commission members, basically the sewerage of this area for Hartford Subdivision and Ramble Wood is, it is going to be necessary to sewer it to the west along the south side of Five Mile Creek. And it will require a lift of some type to get the sewage from this area into the interceptor. At this point we haven't nailed down exactly where the lift will be, but Jim Merkle have met and discussed it and he has done some, a little planning work and we have looked at some elevations. So, it looks like we are destined to have some kind of lift station out in this area. Whether it goes to the west at the interceptor which is west of Ten Mile Road or whether it is on the east side of Ten Mile Road at the west end of Parker Subdivision remains to be seen yet. But it definitely has the requirement of a lift station. We cannot cross Five Mile Creek by gravity to serve either Hartford or Ramble Wood. Johnson: Thank you Gary, any questions of either Mr. Merkle or Mr. Smith at this point? Rountree: Is that an agreeable situation? Smith: I think it is the only alternative that we have, unfortunately the elevation of the lift station or the elevation of the interceptor on the north side of Five Mile Creek is such that you can't cross Five Mile Creek and get into the sewer. Johnson: Any other question? Alidjani: Gary, so does that mean no matter what we are going to have that problem regardless lift station is the only answer? Smith: Right, and it has happened to us on this subdivision, it happened to us on the one that was proposed by Robert Glenn, back at Cherry Lane. When the interceptor was built along Nine Mile Creek and we are also finding it along Five Mile Creek. It just wasn't at a depth grade enough so that the lateral lines can cross under the creek and into the interceptor. It is basically at the same elevation as the bottom of the drains, the interceptor is. • • Meridian Planning & Zoning July 12, 1994 Page 3 Johnson: Any further questions? What is your pleasure? Hepper: Mr. Chairman, I move that we recommend approval of the preliminary plat to the City Council on this project. Alidjani: Second Johnson: It has been moved and seconded that the Commission recommend approval of this project to the City Council, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: 3 YEAS, 1 NEA ITEM #2: TABLED AT JUNE 14, 1994 MEETING: RAMBLE WOOD SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT BY DAN HARDEE: Johnson: I understand this name has been changed to. Bramble Wood. Is there a representative that would like to address the Commission please come forward now. Hutchinson: Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission I am Ted Hutchinson, I am with Tealey's Land Surveying. We have reviewed the comment sheets that were sent out by Mr. Smith and Ms. Stiles concerning the proposal. We tried to address each of those comments we have responded with a letter and a revised preliminary plat to Mr. Smith and Ms. Stiles. Again, with the sewer from Hartford if it is going to go on a lift station, I believe that is the only way we would have access to sewer and that is our intention to extend and connect into that system with the Hartford Subdivision. Are there any questions that I might answer from the Commission? Hepper: Have you talked to the property owner in between these 2 pieces of property? Hutchinson: I believe Mr. Schaffer was here that night night, we will have to work it out with him to make sure we can either cross there or go north around his property. I believe the Bureau of Reclamation has a right of way in there along the north of Five Mile Creek. We are, willing to work with that property owner. Johnson: Any other questions? All of you have this letter dated July 11 which was received today in response to our May 26th letter. Does anyone else have any questions? Thank you, any questions of staff'? Alidjani: I have a question for Shari, Shari, there are 12 items in this letter, any problem with any of them. Have all your requests been answered? • • Meridian City Council August 16, 1994 Page 27 have tabled the plat pending the deeding on the ordinance originally. And so if it is a logical sequence if we have the plat tabled the annexation is not complete then it looks to me like we table the variance request also. Kingsford: What about the findings, what would be the status of those Counselor? Crookston: That is up to the Council, you could request the findings be prepared or you could have the findings tabled along with everything. You wouldn't be able to act on the findings until every thing else is in order. Kingsford: Well, I personally, from my point of view like to see findings prepared at least at this juncture. At least while it is still fresh in everyone's mind. Entertain a motion to have those done. Morrow. So moved Corrie: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Bob to have the City Attorney work on findings of fact and conclusions of law, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea (End of Tape) ITEM #17: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HARTFORD SUBDIVISION BY VIJYA LAXMI DEVELOPMENT: Kingsford: At this time I will open that public hearing and invite the owner or his designee to speak first. Jim Merkle, 9550 Bethel Court, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Merkle: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, I'm here this evening on behalf of the applicant that I won't try to pronounce it either. This is a proposal for annexation and preliminary plat located at the northeast corner of Ustick and Ten Mile Road. This application is for annexation of 20 acres with R-4 zoning. And for preliminary plat including 58 lots on 20 acres which is roughly 2.9 lots per acre. Access to the subdivision will be from Ustick Road, this entrance right here which will line up right across the street with Candlelight Subdivision which is under construction I believe right now. We are also proposing stub streets to the east which would tie into a couple of parcels to the east right • Meridian City Council August 16, 1994 Page 28 here. There were a couple of comments from Shari regarding wanting a stub street to the north as far as access. We are not providing anything to Ten Mile Road there is an existing residence that will be included in the subdivision that would continue to have access out to Ten Mile Road. We are not proposing, this would be too close to the intersection and this one we don't feel is necessary to provide access out here. We have one double entrance out here and should provide plenty of circulation for emergency vehicles and in the future it would tie back in and back out to Ustick Road. Shari's request for a stub street along in here, our proposal is to not provide that stub street and let me give you an overall view of the area. This is kind of a blow up of the area, here is Ustick, Ten Mile Road, the yellow area right here is the subject 20 acres. This big line right there is the existing Five Mile Drain it is about 10 feet deep and 20 feet across. This piece of ground between us and the drain is kind of a no man's land in here. I don't really feel that providing a stub street into this property at this point provides anything vehicular to this piece of ground. I've kind of sketched in here, I don't know if you can see it, but my idea if this property ever develops that they just come in with their own street in this area culdesac and provide lots off of it. If you want, if I was involved in this property I'm not sure that I would request that they cross that, they would still have to go out to Ten Mile Road and crossing this, it is a big expense just for these 7 lots if they can get their access off of Ten Mile Road anyway. So our proposal does not conclude a stub street to the north. All the streets as shown on the preliminary plat will be constructed in accordance with the highway district standards, 50 foot of right of way, 36 foot streets, 5 foot sidewalks as required by Meridian City. Water will be extended from existing water lines in Ustick and in Ten Mile at that location throughout that development and extended up the frontage of the project. Sewer, which was an issue going through planning & zoning for this property originally we had proposed for a lift station somewhere in this vicinity to accommodate our site as well as the site to the east and to pump across Five Mile Drain and into the existing Five Mile Trunk Sewer which is located on the north side of the drain. Gary had some concern with that, I believe back in early 70's when the Five Mile Trunk Sewer was constructed on the north side of the creek for whatever reasons I'm sure there was a good one it was not constructed deep enough to gravity underneath. We can't cross over the top of it, we can't get service in here. This is a FEMA flood way flood plain issue, besides that Nampa Meridian vuon't allow you to cross over the top of the drain to get sewer. So this lift station was our solution for this area. In going through planning and zoning and discussing it with Gary, he thought a better idea might be to sewer all of this area to the west and across this parcel on the other side and some type of lift station further to the west into the Nine Mile Lateral which is acceptable to us. This preliminary plat lays that out with the sewer stub going out to the west, before we had it over here but as a result of discussions with Gary and going through planning & zoning we have moved that over to this location. Pressurized irrigation will be provided to each lot as it standard now in the City of Meridian. This existing ditch coming across the site this will be piped through the site that will be our source for the pressurized irrigation. I would like to address a couple • • Meridian City Council August 16, 1994 Page 29 of comments. I have provided a written response to both Gary and Shari. When I went through planning & zoning I addressed each in the minutes of the meeting but just recently as of today 1 responded in writing to all of their comments. On Gary's the first, the 2 I want to point out. He wanted a comment stating about the existing house to be provided within the preliminary plat, we have accommodated him we have included that in the preliminary plat. And also his comment about the sewer across the. top of the drain, I've already discussed we can't do that. The others are pretty standard and I think we can meet his standards. Regarding Shari's comments, the first one she talks about the stub street to the north and 1 have already addressed, if it is the Council's pleasure to require a stub street I guess we could but it is of our opinion that it is really not necessary. It doesn't make it feasible for this property, he is still going to have to come out to Ten Mile Road, if you bring it up in here somewhere he is going to have a variance of too long of a culdesac, he vuould still want to come out to Ten Mile Road there. So that is basically the reason why we are not putting that stub street in. She also had a point about the existing house being within the preliminary plat we have accommodated that. And then a pedestrian path to Five Mile Creek at the east end of the subdivision we proposed that. We are proposing a 5 foot wide path, however, she has since told me that the ordinance requires 10, I think we can accomplish that. We can do something with these 2 lots at the end, alt of these lots have a minimum of 80 foot, but I think we can shove them all down and do something down here possibly with a flag lot or what not to get that extra 5 feet, but we can provide a 10 foot path. I would like to point out at this time there is no such path on Five Mile. The existing road is on the north side of Five Mile Creek, I am not sure which side of the creek you want your future path on but obviously if we stub it here on you are on the north side of the (inaudible) footbridge or what not in there, we do have pedestrian access out to the sewer easement this way if people wanted to get into the future park allocated in that area in your comprehensive plan. So I think we can meet the 10 foot, I would just like some clarification from staff in the interim 5 to 10 years or whenever the path is going to be there, we don't want that to just have to landscape and put a path down there to nowhere. Sop possibly just meeting the requirement for the improvements but allowing for space for it sometime in the future to connect up to wherever the path might be. Her other comments I have addressed in writing and I think those are pretty standard comments. At this point I would like to address any questions you may have. Kingsford: Any questions for Mr. Merkle? Morrow. Jim, the property to the north that you are talking about that is basically kind of land locked by the subdivision is that under the same ownership or is that different ownership? Merkle: It is the same ownership from here up on both sides. Both Five Mile and the (inaudible) Lateral which is a pretty big ditch that runs along the north side of the ditch. Meridian City Council August 16, 1994 Page 30 ~~ Kingsford: Any other questions for Mr. Merlcle? Anyone else from the public that would like to offer testimony on this issue? John Shaffer, 2788 West Ustick Road, was sworn by the City Attorney. Shaffer: There has been a few changes to the plat since the last time I have seen that. 1 guess one question I would have is the sewer line to the east elevation if that accommodates properties to the east. I also request that the road to the east that does dead end, I do own the piece of property to the east also, it is a 4.5 acre parcel there that there would be a fence at that dead end street to prevent foot traffic through and across the property if possible. Also, at this time I do not intend or at this moment I should say plan to develop the property. I would request that a construction of a neighbor friendly type wood fence between the subdivision property as well as mine be constructed. This would prevent unsightly storage of materials in the backyards as well as separation of property between mine and theirs. It ~ will help control construction debris during construc#ion as well as prevent unwanted pedestrian traffic from these lots through onto my property as well as safety and security after the homes have been constructed. At the time that this was first submitted there were no covenants available at that time, if possible I would like review those covenants if possible. Kingsford: We require those to be submitted and when they are if you would check with the City Clerk those would be made available to you. Shaffer: The only other question I have is the dead end street, if it is required to be a culdesac at that end maybe to prevent parking of motor trailers and things of that nature at the end of that dead end street. Kingsford: We ave an ordinance on that subject. Any questions for Mr. Shaffer? Morrow. I have a question with respect to your 4.5 acres, you said currently an agricultural usage? Shaffer: Yes it is, we do righ# now have a residence on the property. Morrow. So it is your home and agricultural. Kingsford: Any other questions? Thank you, anyone else from the public? Ray Wilder, 3340 North Ten Mile Road, was sworn by the City Attorney. Wilder: My place we are talking about here, my neighbor here he lives on the east of me. • • Meridian City Council August 16, 1994 Page 31 1 might want to build a house back there by him, (inaudible) and I think he should have to build a fence. I might want to build a new house back there and I don't want to look at his stuff, so I think he should build half of this fence for these people because he has more junk than I have. And I think (inaudible) if he wants a fence to keep these people out he should have to build half of this fence. Kingsford: Thank you, that was pretty straight forward, do you have any questions for Mr. Wilder? Anyone else from the public? Merkle: I would just like to address Mr. Shaffer's comments. Yes, the sewer there will a stub to the east low enough to accommodate those parcels to the east. Regarding the temporary fence at the dead end street to the east that will be, since we plat public right of way right to the parcel line that would be something the highway district would have to approve since it would be their right of way. I don't think we have a problem with doing it as long as it doesn't affect their requirements. Kingsford: Many of our stub streets in subdivisions that currently exist the developer is required to put up a barricade. Merkle: Right that is standard, but what I think he is talking about is a fence of some kind in addition to that. Regarding the perimeter fencing on the east I believe, in your development agreement will be addressing that issue. So I don't think that will be a problem. The covenants have not been submitted but will be submitted when we submit the final plat for processing which to my knowledge is the typical way to do it. Also the dead end street to the east is not a culdesac, a tum around is not required. Usually if you go more than 150 feet or more than 1 lot depth you are required to do that but we are not required to do that in this case. And those are the comments regarding. Tolsma: (Inaudible) for several years now we have required 2 ways in and out from a subdivision and this only has one in and out of the thing. There is going to have to be another way out on Ten Mile Road as emergency access (inaudible) because there is an extremely long line of houses back in here and if there is only one way in and out of here it makes it really bad for emergency traffic. What they have done a lot of times in the past is they have put a roadway in here (inaudible) with a break way barricade so you can get in and out of it (inaudible) fire department or ambulance access to get in. Merkle: Councilman Tolsma I think the point is well taken, I believe with this particular 20 foot wide sewer lot we are proposing to satisfy Gary's needs for the lift station to the west we coordinate some type of emergency access through that point if that would be acceptable to you. • Meridian City Council August 16, 1994 Page 32 • Kingsford: (Inaudible) require that it be a covered surface anyway. I think his comment with regard to the break away barrier though (inaudible). Any other comments from the public? Seeing none I will close that public hearing. Council members, need to prepare findings. Crookston: There has been no significant change in the testimony. Kingsford: Is there a motion to approve the findings prepared for P & Z. Yerrington: So moved Morrow. Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Walt to approve the findings of fact and conclusions of law as prepared for the planning and zoning roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Corrie -Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: ALL YEA Kingsford: With regard to the preliminary plat you have the issue of the annexation and so forth being required so it would be appropriate to direct the City Attorney to prepare the ordinance. Morrow. So moved Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Watt, second by Ron to have the City Attorney prepare the annexation and zoning ordinance, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: What would be appropriate Counselor since that isn't now, we have run into this a couple of times, table the preliminary plat? Morrow. So moved Corrie: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Bob to table the preliminary plat for Hartford ,,. ~ Meridian City Council August 16, 1994 Page 33 subdivision all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: Having not said that was to a date certain I assume that was for the next meeting. ITEM #18: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING FOR THE HOLLOWS BY BOND CAMPBELL: Kingsford; At this time I will open that public hearing and invite the owner or his designee to speak first. Bond Campbell, 1150 East Ustick Road, was sworn by the City Attorney. Campbell: I guess we are here to request the annexation and zoning to the City Council. I really don't have any comments other than Shari had some information that I gave her regarding the way that the zoning had gone through Planning & Zoning. The request had originally been for R-4, and after discussing it with the engineer and Shari and after that meeting I discovered that I was designing around the R-3 criteria without knowing it so I am actually designing for R-3 and trying to get a variance on the original R-4 application. Kingsford: I think you could be put fewer on there and you wouldn't need a variance. Any questions of Mr. Campbell from the Council? Morrow. Let me see if I understand this, you originally asked for R-4 but you designed to R-3? Campbell: After, the application was turned in for R-4, but my preliminary plat that I designed met all the R-3 criteria and it was brought to my attention that would be a more desirable zoning request, R-3 and so upon finding that out we changed, we went ahead and designed to our original criteria but I guess what I am asking is that you would be aware that R-3 is what the zone ordinance I would prefer. Morrow: I have no further questions. Crookston: I have a question, what you are asking for then is to change your application to an R-3 residential application is that right? Campbell: In a way yes, if that requires going back through the original application I am not sure that I am prepared to do that. I may leave it designed to R-3 criteria and zone it Meridian City Council September 20, 1994 Page 30 cause our young people to desire the gang type atmosphere. Neighborhood watch, block homes, dress codes in schools are all very good ideas yet are they truly removing the attraction that pulls our young. I along with every community member I have talked with want to do our part. With this Council's support we can overcome this issue, our children are our future we can't afford to let them down. That is my statement. Kingsford: Do you have specific proposals Don? Fisher: I haven't had time to really research and talk to people to get a multitude of ideas. I think it is not one simple solution. Kingsford: I agree, I deal with the little renegades everyday I understand that. I would suggest that you do visit over this, there has been some extensive work already been done in that area, in the juvenile crime area. 1 know Mrs. Kluever at Meridian High School is on a task force, several members in Boise, I think their Chief has been involved in that in part. I would encourage you to work with them and certainly that would be a good forum to challenge your efforts through. 1 am sure you will not find any opposition from this Council and myself in trying to stem any kind of a gang activity that might be taking place. Fisher: My intent in addressing the City Council is to bring it to your attention that there are a lot of children out there that are considered at risk. I think we are in an advantage right now that if we address and catch it before it becomes a problem or spreads like a bad virus. Kingsford: I appreciate that Don, I certainly share those concerns as I am sure the Council does. Thank you. ITEM #15: HARTFORD SUBDIVISION:. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: Kingsford: Shari, do you have that agreement? Will you report on its progress. Stiles: Mayor and Council there is a letter in your packets 1 believe from the developer. It is a letter stating his intent to enter into a development agreement but his problem now is he doesn't own the property and has requested that he be allowed to go ahead with the annexation and the plat so that he can determine what those final conditions will be. I talked to Wayne Crookston about this and it is just, the current owner of the property can't enter into a development agreement and the one with the option would like to wait until he is the owner of the property. Kingsford: The actual owners of the property do agree to annexation and zoning? • • Meridian City Council September 20, 1994 Page 31 Stiles: Yes Morrow: I am perplexed here, has this process, the Hartford Subdivision has it started its way through the process with the former owner who is now apparently selling to V.L. for short, they are selling to them. The impression of the letter is they are going to start the process over. Stiles: The applicant has always been the Vijya Laxmi. The other development agreements we have done have gone onto the point where they are just waiting to get their final plat signed. So they are already the legal owner and the final purchase is complete. In this case where we are changing to having the development agreement prior to even being annexed they are in that transition period where the applicant can't legally enter into an agreement that would be binding. Morrow: So help me out here. Kingsford: Counselor, does the ordinance then speak to that development agreement as you have prepared Ordinance #670, does it speak to a development agreement so as to protect us in that regard? Crookston: I have not looked at the ordinance itself. Kingsford: Well, who would have looked at that pray tell? Do you have a copy of it there so you can review it quickly. Stiles: I think all of the ordinances that have been passed have that. Tolsma: (Inaudible) Crookston: It is a real problem Kingsford: Do we have a disclaimer in there that if the applicant doesn't become the owner that it is de-annexed. I guess it looks like it is more or less covered. Merkle: V.L. is the applicant he has the option to buy on the property from Wilder but as is typical not every applicant that comes through you is the owner of the property in the development. They are going to close on the property sometime in the near future, I don't .know exactly when, but after the preliminary plat and annexation are approved by the Council. Your ordinance 11-216 L and 417 D regarding a development agreement state that basically the applicant or developer will enter into an agreement stating what his intentions for the property are. In a nutshell that is what your ordinance. What your • s Meridian City Council September 20, 1994 Page 32 conclusions of law you have written with the annexation state various items stating you will provide pressurized irrigation, you will the ditches, you will connect to meridian water and sewer, that you will be subject to the development ordinances and the zoning ordinances and then at the bottom it says that if the provisions of this chapter are not met you will be subject to de-annexation. Well obviously he can't do those items prior to annexation, he can't connect to city water, he can't do those things. He can't enter into a development agreement prior to annexation, so in my mind it is kind of conflicting. V.L. can't enter into a development agreement, obviously you are not protected by that. In that letter you have he is going to enter into a development agreement, but he just like the process to continue along so he can get into his final plat stage which on the other project he has done Cougar Creek, the development agreement was entered into and signed prior to the signature of the final plat, which is further into the process. So I think that is more appropriate than having it now when some of the issues that aren't flushed out until final platting are evening addressed yet. And he has stated his intention he is going to enter into a development and the conclusions of the findings of fact basically state that the requirements of this paragraph are not met will be subject to de-annexation and loss of city services so you are covered in that respect. It is basically a technicality, I am not sure he needs to sign. Ray Wilder who owns the property certainly isn't going to enter into a development agreement at this time. I should have had him come in and speak to you regarding that. Kingsford: Well, as I look at those, we have gotten to that stage many times and the development came about just prior to final plat. I certainly don't see the problem with that. I guess it issues the way it is one the agenda, we just dispense with item #15 until it is put together and move forward with annexation if that is your pleasure. Or you passed findings of fact and conclusions of law to that extent. Morrow: So moved Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to dispense with Item #15, the development agreement until such time as the applicant is the owner, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #16: ORDINANCE #670 -HARTFORD ANNEXATION AND ZONING: Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 35, T.4N, R.1W, B.M., ADA • Meridian City Council September 20, 1994 Page 33 • COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the public that would like Ordinance #670 read in its entirety? Seeing none I would entertain a motion. Yerrington: I will make the motion with suspension of the rules to approve #670. Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to approve Ordinance #670 with suspension of the rules, discussion. Morrow: I have a question here so it is clear in my mind. In the past, we have approve the ordinance and said okay it will be enacted upon receipt of the development agreement. Now the question in my mind is how is this different than what we have done in the past, now that we have the thing in the proper sequence? Obviously what happens here is that we have an owner who is not an owner at this point in time and if we approve the ordinance not subject to the development agreement which is what we have done in the past. The ordinance has become effective when the development agreement is executed. That still gives this group V.L. the opportunity to press ahead with the project and get the thing done. But then it also protects us from the standpoint of A being consistent and B ensuring that we are getting the development agreement before the ordinance becomes effective. And so my question is how does this work. Kingsford: (Inaudible) it speaks to that exactly (inaudible) it has to be the development agreement entered into or they will be (inaudible) as well as in our ordinance. Likewise in terms of being consistent we are inconsistent anyway. I think we have probably numerous annexations that we haven't yet completed a development agreement upon. Tonight for example we passed one with regard to the Van Auker property that is as you said, if they don't agree to that we are not going to annex them. But, we probably have 99% of that property we have annexed that would follow this guideline that we haven't in fact had a development agreement ahead of times. Tolsma: Well, a technical point here Counselor, it says Section 2 that the property shall be subject to the annexation, the owner shall (inaudible) following requirements. The owner that has the property right now does not intend to meet any of these requirements. So if we enact this for this owner than the second owner what does he do. When he becomes the second owner when does this ordinance take effect. Which owner are we talking about here? Crookston: Well, the ordinance takes effect when it is passed and published. The other problem that we have is that we normally do not approve plats until we have passed an C~ Meridian City Council September 20, 1994 Page 34 annexation ordinance. U Kingsford: Likewise we don't accept plats until there is an owner of record. We got into a real fiasco out here on with Voigt and Boesiger on that subject that we didn't' realize that there wasn't an owner of record until we had separate preliminary plats in here. Tolsma: I think I will withdraw my second on that motion. Kingsford: Well, the catch 22 comes is they are not going to do anything with it unless we annex it. Corrie: I think we need an owner somewhere along here. Crookston: Jim, if you know when will Mr. Wilder convey the property, at what point? Merkle: It is unknown to me, I talked to my client who is V.L. and the closing is the next 6 weeks, they wouldn't give me a specific date. But the point is what you would be saying tonight is you can't have anybody except for an owner of a property do an application of a property which is not right. Crookston: The owner has consented to the annexation, but what you would be requiring is that every owner who owns a tract of land out there is (inaudible) he has to enter into a development agreement. tam not sitting here arguing that they are not going to enter into a development agreement, they are going to. What I am saying is it is a condition in your findings for the annexation that is says if the requirements of this paragraph are not met it will be subject to losses of city services and de-annexation, you are covered right there. There will be a development agreement prior to the signature of the final plat as has been the case in all of the projects I have. been involved with. And now all of the sudden we are saying you have to enter into the development agreement prior to annexation, prior to preliminary plat approval, prior to everything. Kingsford: I think a lot of those development agreements prior to annexation have been commercial and industrial property too. I think there is some validity in doing that on some of those projects. Merkle: There are some issues as you go through final platting and final design that are even flushed out yet that need to be addressed in a development agreement. Like reimbursements for off site utilities, things like that aren't even addressed yet during annexation but they are addressed in development agreements. Kingsford: Things like impact fees, we have a kind of whole bunch of those things that fit • Meridian City Council September 20, 1994 Page 35 into (inaudible). Merkle: Your ordinance, I am not reading the ordinance that you have that you are going to adopt or may adopt, but the ordinance you have there is small paragraph regarding development agreements and all it says is a requirement of the development agreement is for the applicant to state his intention for the development of the property and it be agreed upon prior to recording the final plat. That is what your ordinance states. It doesn't say prior to annexation, it says it is a condition of annexation but not prior to annexation. It becomes prior to annexation when you put it in the findings of fact and your ordinance you have tonight. I would just like to stress he is not trying to get out of it he is going to do it, it is just now is not the appropriate time. Morrow: I understand that part of the issue, what is the issue with respect to the comparison between he Voigt and Boesiger properties? Kingsford: I think that we are covered in the findings still with regard to the Voigt property, we annexed some property legitimately that the owner didn't request. As I recall, excuse me the owner did request (inaudible) but the property was not even optioned by the person that we had a preliminary plat for. And so then a different owner then bought another parcel of that and submitted a different preliminary plat which caused us to have kind of conflicting traffic flows and a whole range of things in that section. This small of a parcel I don't see that same problem. Your client has an option on the entire parcel of Wilder's so I don't' see that happening there. I just brought that up to illustrate some of the problems we've had. Morrow: Let me see if I understand this right, what we are doing here really is we have taken, somehow what has happened is that the development agreement was requested prior to annexation which doesn't make sense. So now we are going to do is Kingsford: We are going to annex it if they don't do the development agreement we de- annex it. Morrow: We are not going to make the timing of this ordinance or the adoption of this ordinance contingent upon receiving that development agreement as we have done with apparently commercial types of plats. Tolsma: Should there be wording changed in this development agreement, it should be applicant instead of owner then on this. The property shall be subject to de-annexation if the applicant shall not meet the following requirements. Kingsford: Well, the applicant is the owner Meridian City Council September 20, 1994 Page 36 Tolsma: (Inaudible) Kingsford: Right, but as soon as the applicant, in essence the owner he signed to do that, we accept these from the owner. So we have his agreement to do this annexation. Crookston: All the owner does is consent to it, he is not applying for it. Tolsma: (Inaudible) the owner shall meet the requirements so he is not going to meet the requirements (inaudible). Merkle: (Inaudible) which the applicant is going to enter into or he is not going to have a project approved by you guys. (Discussion Inaudible) Tolsma: Well it should be owner or applicant. Kingsford: Legal counsel worded that wrong, it is hard to get good help. Morrow: My point is here, or the point is do we approve the ordinance as written or with the little insertion of or applicant? Kingsford: it doesn't matter, because the ordinance is saying if the owner doesn't enter into a development agreement it is de-annexed. If it is never bought by V.L. then obviously Mr. Wilder is not going to enter into that development agreement in which case it would be de-annexed which is our intent. Crookston: Well, the concern that I have and maybe just bringing up new wrinkles is that when the preliminary plat is approved that is really what controls most of the development of the property. Kingsford: But if we conditioned that the development agreement then that is a condition of the preliminary plat. If it is not fulfilled it doesn't go forward either. Crookston: I agree with that, I think we need to change some of our procedures. Kingsford: That is what we did and that is how we got into this mess. Morrow: So let's make it real simple how do we get out of it. Kingsford: Roll call vote, the motion was to approve Ordinance #670 with suspension of • • Meridian City Council September 20, 1994 Page 37 the rules. Morrow: I think Mr. Tolsma indicated he Tolsma: I withdrew the second, I wanted to get that cleared up. Kingsford: I didn't recognize his withdrawal it is still on the floor. Crookston: You were still in discussion when he made the motion. Kingsford: Any further discussion? Roll call vote ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Corrie -Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Morrow: But now the result of that dissertation is that we won't be in that fix again, is that correct? Kingsford: Not necessarily. ITEM #17: HARTFORD SUBDIVISION: PRELIMINARY PLAT: Morrow: Can we have a presentation by the developers representative? Merkle: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, I am Jim Merkle of Hubble Engineering, the representative for the Applicant Vijya Laxmi. The public hearing for the preliminary plat was heard before you I think the second hearing in August a month ago. The issues, the comments raised by Ms. Stiles and Mr. Smith regarding the preliminary in a written response to both of them, I think you spoke with them during that public hearing regarding that off site sewer and the connection to the east including the house, the existing Wilder place within the plat which I have addressed and I have responded in writing to both of them. I think that was the end of the public hearing, I am not sure there were any other issues to be resolved to my recollection. Kingsford: That sewer, that was going to be a gravel sewer? Merkle: Yes per Gary's request, the 20 foot separate lot (inaudible) owned by the homeowners and maintained by the homeowners (inaudible) gravel access over the top. Sewer will gravity to the west at some point (inaudible) Nine Mile Trunk sewer which we have gone over with Gary. The final details have not been resolved yet we will do that • • Meridian City Council September 20, 1994 Page 38 during the final design. Also, Shari wanted the 10 foot path provided up to your future Five Mile Creek which we have provided in the extended subdivision. I don't think there were any other outstanding issues. Kingsford: Any other questions from the Council? Problems that either Gary or Shari have with that? Smith: Mr. Mayor and Council members, I guess really it is not a problem as Jim mentioned we just have to work out some details on where the sewer is going as it leads to the northwest corner of their subdivision. One other thing, I guess it kind of relates to this subdivision but it also relates to Bramble Wood subdivision which is east of this development and that is how Bramble Wood is going to get its sewer to the sewer line, to our sewer line. It may affect this in order, and I am not sure and it may have to come back to this subdivision at their northeast corner. So, there may be some, there would have to be some allowance made there in order to get around Mr. Shaffer's property. It would have to get into the Five Mile Creek right of way or property to the north of Mr. Shaffer's property. Morrow: Mr. Shaffer was the one that testified about he is on the west side of the Bramble wood. Smith: Correct, he is between Bramble Wood and Hartford. Morrow: And he is like a 5 acre parcel of ground. Smith: I am not sure what the size is, something like that. He has some outbuildings that preclude sewer line from crossing his property from Bramble Wood into Hartford. So the sewer would need to go up out around the north boundary of his property and then come back into Hartford in order to continue onto the west. So that is an issue that needs to be worked out. I think that Jim and I, I know that Jim and I can work and resolve that issue that will need to be an access way coming into Hartford in an easement type of situation. (Inaudible) Smith: The only other thing and I don't know how to address it other than I raise the question and give (inaudible) location of the wastewater plant. Jim had addressed it by saying the applicant will take precautions to ensure potential residents are aware of the proximity of the treatment plant. I don't know what that means exactly, but. Morrow: If I may comment on that, I think in the past what we have done with agricultural uses and things like that is made it a requirement that it appear in the covenants and • Meridian City Council September 20, 1994 Page 39 • restrictions that the prior usage does exist and I think that is also appropriate here. That is the means that we have used before and that the real estate community is to be made aware of that also. So that it was in fact part of the CC&R's. Kingsford: We could require that perspective buyers be taken to the second T box at Broadmore County Club. For your information that is right next to the Nampa sewer plant. Smith: As I mentioned before on several projects we don't have a lot of problems with odors but it is the nature of the business and every once in awhile there is. We treat human waste out there and it is not a perfume factory. Morrow: tam sensitive to that, my point is I think it needs to be noticed in those CC&R's. Smith: I agree with you, that is an appropriate place to put it. My concern again is that the second buyer of a home for example isn't' always aware of those CC&R's. As time goes by those things kind of get lost. I realty don't' know the answer to the question or to my observation. I just don't' want to be recipient of a bunch of phone calls when that development goes in and people are living there. I think that is one thing that was brought up during the Comprehensive Plan formulation was to develop a buffer around the wastewater treatment plant and not let people build righ# up to the boundaries of the plant. of course this is not right up to the boundary of the plant, it is 1000 feet away. Still a northwest wind blowing through there, we have sludge out in the drying beds, there isn't a whole lot you can do with that. We have gone out and dumped believe it or not we buy 55 pound drums of perfume and dump in those beds in order to help alleviate the odor problem but it is just the nature of the beast. Kingsford: I think we have it in the CC&R's, like you say you are never going to eliminate it. But you can point to it and say you were given a copy of those we are sorry. It reminds me of the folks that built houses next to Meryl's egg farm in Eagle. The nature of that business is a little bit smelly. Corrie: I am curious, what did you mean by we will take precautions to ensure (Inaudible) Merkle: I am not sure what we can do unless we put a billboard out there or something. The CC&R's is the logical and obvious place. If a homeowner does not read their CC&R's or take the responsibility to what else can you do. Kingsford: Most people don't but I agree it is their responsibility and if they haven't read them. • Meridian City Council September 20, 1994 Page 40 Corrie: If they are there at the right time they will know. Merkle: That was the intent to put it in the CC&R's. • Smith: I agree with Mr. Merkle, I don't' think the plat is the proper place for that sort of thing. I have tried to limit notations on the plat to very specific things that deal with the plat itself. It is after all a survey document, we have a tendency to want to put a lot of things on the plat that maybe don't' need to be there or shouldn't be there. I think the CC&r's would be the appropriate place. Kingsford: Again on homeowners, I don't think they look any more closely at the plat than they do their CC&R's. Smith: That is all I have unless you have other questions. Morrow: You are satisfied then that the project is essentially in good shape and everything is covered? With the exception of the name, how to pronounce it and what it means. Smith: Yes Corrie: I move that we approve the preliminary plat of Hartford Subdivision with the approval of the city staff and their requests of certain items be covered. Morrow: Second Kingsford: Moved by Bob, second by Walt to approve the Preliminary Plat for Hartford Subdivision and subject to the approval of the staff requirements including all those listed and including a development agreement, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #18: THE HOLLOWS: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: Kingsford: Are we in exactly the same shape in terms of The Hollows and The Hollows annexation. Campbell: No, I own it and I am the applicant. Kingsford: Do we have the development agreement? What stage is it at? That development agreement met the criteria we were after?