Loading...
Greenhaven Estates AZ PP HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY ~E~~~ COUNCIL MEMBERS OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ONALD R. TOLSMA ~ ~ R WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., Clty Clerk JANICEL.GASS,CityTreasurer '~ i ABT W MIORROW CITY OF MERIDIAcitdr Or ~~~~~ GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES i i t JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste water Supt. or stra n Planner a Zoning Adm KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 JIM JOHNSON W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Chairman ~ Planning 8 Zoning WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning S~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 4 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/19/94 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning with a Preliminary Plat for Greenhaven Estates _ BY: The Development Com{~anay LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Meridian Road and South of stick JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P2 JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z -TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C -BOB CORRIE, C/C -WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C -WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT -POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY -CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: N • APPLIATION FOR ANNEXATION APPROVAL & ZONING OR REZONE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FILING INFORMATION I. GENERAL INFORMATION Greenhaven Estates Subdivision (PROPOSED NAME OF SUBDIVISION) North Meridian Road, south of Ustick (GENERAL LOCATION) Part of N 1/2 NE 1/4, Section 1, T.3N., R.1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho (LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ATTACH IF LENGTHY) See attached John and Candy Homan >~ and Donald and Rae Jean ~Ioman 888-2311 (OWNER(S) OF RECORD) (NAME ) (TELEPHONE N0.) 2825 N. Meridian Road, Meridian, ID 83642 (ADDRESS) The Development Co. 887-5622 (APPLICANT) (NAME) (TELEPHONE N0.) 1903 S. Gull Cove Place, Meridian, ID 83642 ( Ai~~1RRSS 1 Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. J-U-B ENGINEERS , Inc . 'i 7h " 7 ~ ~ ~ (ENGINEER, SURVEYOR OR PLANNER) (NAME) (TELEPHONE N0.) 250 S. Beachwood Avenue, Suite 201, Boise, ID 83709 (ADDRESS) City of Meridian (JURISDICTION(S) REQUIRING APPROVAL) _ Residential - Sin le-family - R-4 zone recruested (TYPE OF SUBDIVISION - RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL) +50 14.85 ACRES OF LAND IN CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP. (ACCEPTED BY:) (FEE) ~ ~ • ~J~u Engineers Surveyors Planners GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIVISION ROMAN ANNEXATION NARRATIVE Date: Prepared by: Owners: Developer September 15, 1994 Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. Boise, Idaho John W. and Candy J. Homan, Husband and Wife and Donald F. and Rae Jean Homan, Husband and Wife The Development Group - Bill Hardt I. DEVELOPMENT LOCATION The Homan property is located in a portion of the NE 1/4 of Section 1, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, B.M., Ada County, Idaho. More particularly, the project lies west of North Meridian Road and north of Cherry Lane. Lansbury Lane Subdivision is located along the southerly boundary. Strasser Farm Subdivision lies to the north. To the north and west lies undeveloped pasture and farmland. II. SITE DESCRIPTION Currently, the site is comprised of approximately 14.85 acres of pasture land. The Onweiler Canal terminates just north of the northeast corner of the parcel and a small irrigation/waste ditch flows along the north end of the property. The parcel also contains two single-family homes located on the east end. At this time, the property is situated in Ada County and is zoned RT (Rural Transitional). North Meridian Road provides access to the parcel along the easterly boundary with North N.W. 3rd Avenue from existing developments to the south. It is anticipated that a street will be stubbed to the north for future land development. III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The developer plans to request a re-zone of the property to residential R-4. The project will consist of approximately 40 single-family residential lots resulting in a gross density of 2.7 lots per acre. The lot sizes will conform to the City of Meridian Zoning Ordinance for residential developments. This zoning request and annexation will comply with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. • • . ~~-u-s , '' Homan Annexation Narrative Engineers Surveyors Planners September 15, 1994 Page 2 IV. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS A. Sanitary Sewer System: There is an existing public sanitary sewer system on North N.W. 3rd Avenue that will extend into and service the majority of this property. There is also existing public sanitary sewer in North Meridian Road. B. Domestic Water System: It is anticipated that domestic water and fire flows will be supplied by the City of Meridian through the extension of an existing water system located in North Meridian Road. The system would also be tied in at North N.W. 3rd Avenue to the south. A new water distribution system will be constructed within the planned development, which will include the necessary fire hydrants, valves, blow-offs, and appurtenances as required by the State of Idaho Drinking Water Standards. C. Public Utilities: This subdivision will include public utilities, such as electric power from Idaho Power Company; natural gas from Intermountain Gas Company; telephone service from U.S. West Communications; and TV service from T.C.I., a Cable Network. Utility easements will be provided upon each lot to accommodate these public utilities as required. D. Public Streets: All streets will be constructed to Ada County Highway District Standards and Specifications,. All streets will be constructed to Collector and Local Street Standards. Storm water drainage for these public streets will be collected and retained on-site in accordance with A.C.H.D. standards. Disposal of storm water into the natural drainage will consist of only flows equal to the pre-development storm water discharge of the property (i.e., the amount of storm water discharged into this drainage will not exceed what is currently flowing into said drainage ditch in its present condition). A landscape lot and landscape easements will be provided along North Meridian Road. These common lots will be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. A variance will be requested to allow Hardt Court to exceed the City minimum culdesac length of 450 feet. ~J~u Engineers Surveyors E. F Planners Irrigation and Drainage: L J Homan Annexation Narrative September 15, 1994 Page 3 The existing Onweiler Canal and other irrigation ditches will be tiled to continue delivery of irrigation water to neighboring properties. Other smaller irrigation and drainage ditches that deliver water to this parcel only will be abandoned. A pressurized irrigation system will provide irrigation water to each lot. tentatively planned to be located at of the development. Nampa & Meridian will own and operate the system. Fire Protection be constructed to A pumping station is the northeast corner Irrigation District As mentioned earlier, the domestic water system will be maintained and operated by the City of Meridian. Part of their service will include the delivery of adequate fire protection. The delivery system will be sized and hydrants placed throughout the development to meet the necessary fire flows as established by the Meridian Fire District. J-U-B #18857 • ANNEXATION/ZONING REQUEST AFFIDAVIT We, John W. and Candy J. Homan, husband and wife, and Donald F. and Rae Jean Homan, husband and wife, do hereby certify that we are record owners of a part of the land described as the "Homan Annexation" in an application for Annexation & Zoning Application being submitted to the Ciry of Meridian for consideration. We further state that we hereby officially request annexation of said property into the Corporate City Limits of the City of Meridian, Idaho. In addition, we hereby state and certify that the subject property will be posted one week before the public hearing stating that the above-mentioned applications with the City of Meridian have been made. Dated this ~lO ~~~ day of September, 1994. t,J. J .Homan Candy J. Homa STATE OF IDAHO ) ss. County of Ada ) vYt.~C. ~v~~'~C onald F. Ho ~~~ Rae Jean H ON THIS ~~day of S~P~~'~'" ~ ~~' , 19 9~ ,before me; a notary public in and for IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. My Notary Commission Expires ~J eL ~' y / 9 9 ~! My Notary Bond Expires ?J~C. 5~' , 19~ Notary Public for Idaho Residing at ~~D /S' ~ ,Idaho known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is (are) subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that fey executed the same. ~ • • ~~-uJ Engineers Surveyors Planners Project: 18857 Date: September 14, 1994 HOMAN ANNEXATION LAND SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY All that certain real property situated in Section 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., Ada County, State of Idaho, described as follows: A portion of the NE 1/4 of Section 1, further described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap being the East one quarter corner of Section 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M.; thence North 00°17'24" East, 1,724.96 feet along the East Section line, (formerly known as North, 103.43 rods) to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 89°19'43" West, 1,735.54 feet (formerly known as West, 105 rods) parallel to and 933.40 feet South of the North line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1; thence South 00°07'18" West, 381.18 feet, (formerly known as South, •21.76 and 10/11 rods) parallel with and 924.00 feet East of the West line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1; thence South 89°27'04" East, 1,734.40 feet (formerly known as East, 105 rods) along the North line of Lansbury Lane Subdivision, as filed in book 64, page 6499 of Plats, Ada County Records; thence North 00°17'24" East, 377.53 feet, (formerly known as North, 21.76 and 10/11 rods) along said East line of Section 1 to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; Said parcel contains 15.11 acres, more or less. SUBJECT T0: All existing road rights-of-way and easements of record or appearing on the above-described parcel of land. Prepared by: J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. GAL:ls Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. • • ~~-u.B~ Engineers Surveyors Planners Project: 18857 Date: September 14, 1994 GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIVISION LAND SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY All that certain real property situated in Section 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., Ada County, State of Idaho, described as follows: A portion of the NE 1/4 of Section 1, as recorded under Instrument No. 8965901 on April 13, 1989, in Ada County records, further described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap being the East one quarter corner of Section 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M.; thence North 00°17'24" East, 1,724.96 feet along the East Section line, (formerly known as North, 103.43 rods); thence North 89°19'43" West, 30.00 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 00°17'24" West, 377.53 feet, (formerly known as South, 21.76 and 10/il rods) parallel to said East line of Section 1, to a point being the Northeast corner of Lansbury Lane Subdivision as filed in book 64, page 6499 of Plats, Ada County Records; thence North 89°27'04" West, 1704.40 feet along said Lansbury Lane Subdivision, to a point that is 924.00 feet East of the West line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 1; thence North 00°07'18" East, 381.18 feet, (formerly known as North, 21.76 and 10/il rods) parallel with said West line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, to a point being 933.40 feet South of the North line of said Northeast Quarter of Section 1; thence South 89°19'43" East, 1,705.54 feet parallel to said North line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; Said parcel contains 14.85 acres, more or less. SUBJECT T0: All existing road rights-of-way and easements of record or appearing on the above-described parcel of land. Prepared by: J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. GAL:ls Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. P-93194_KC/DK V~IARRAI~`TY DEED 8915 X3'7 FOR VALUE RECEIVED JACK A. VA\ P?,EPECHEM and ARIA y. VA` Pr`c'PDCI~I, Husnsrd and Wife GRAtiTOR(s), c+c!es(do) hereby GRANT, BARCtAi\, SELL and C01'~'EY unto JO^ti W, y~~\ and C:3\'DY J. HO~i~\, Husband end hifP GRANTEE(S), whose current address is: 3835 .north >'~ridia.~ Road, "ie: a~an, ID A3Fhi. rite follo!-•ing Cescribed real property in Coun , S4te of Idaho, more particularly described as follows, to K'It: `ice OG*TL~.\CI.\G AT A POL\"T 103.3 RODS ~ORTFI OF 'I?•Or SOC:'?~'~ST COR.\'~ OF TFiE SOL"fIIE?ST QCARTER OF THE ti'ORTI~\ST Q(:a.RTFlt Oc SECI'IO~ 1, :GI~ISHIP 3 :`:ORTIi, Firl\GE 1 hFST, OF '!'tIE BOI:+E-"LcRIDIA\, I\ 3D.a QL'~:Y, ST,AT'c OF IDAHO, ~\~ RC~'\L1iG :ICE t~EST 105 RODS Tl•L~C'E SOLTH =1.76 .1\~ 10/11 ROCS; ~=`:CE EA_5T 105 RODS TO Tim EAST LIVE OF SAID VOr7CIiEA.ST Q~'.aR"'ER OF SECI'IOW O\E; :FTEtCE tiORTH AID~iG SAID SECPIOV LI:~? 31.7!i A\U 10~ 11 RODS :`D T!~ ?LACE OF BEGZ\1IX:,. E?il'E_D"T TiiAT PORTiO'~ LYI1G AZTHIV T:-:E RIG1iI OF I~~Y :'OR CCL1"I'Y i/7yD CU>^IO\ZY REFr'~tRED iU AS ~~IDL1I ROaI) 04'x..rt' A\~ .a.=c;JSS THE E=+STEi?LY PO.r,TIOti OF SAID PR.n2SES. TO HAVE .4\D TO HOLL' t.'te said premises, with their appurtenances into the said Grantee(s,. and Granters) L•eirs and assigns foreeer. And the said Grantor(s) doestdol hereby covenant [o and with the saiC Grantee(s), t.'tat Grantor(s) s are the ownerts) in fx simple of said premises: that said premises are free from aL' cn:umbrancrs, EXCEPT hose to w-hick this conveyance is expressly made subject and those made, suffered or done by the Grante-.(st: and subject to res:n•ations. rest~ic- tions. dedications, easements. right of way and a¢reements, (if any) of rearord. and general taxes and assessnrnu. (includes irrigation :.nd utilin• ssessmenu, if any) for the current .:ear, which :,:~ no[ ~ et due and payable. ar.1 [hat Granter(s) will war- raltt and defend the same from all la!.ful claims whauoever. Dated: April 10 '_9 89 /~~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ' Jacit .~. t-an Pa~:x=,~t~:t a_'.i ~:. i'.3:t -ae~•_^ .At'i:XO'Jt'LEDGEAtEXT -Individual STATE OF IDAHO , Courm• of Ada . ss. On ~`:ts 10th day of Aflr11~ . in the )ear of_1969 .be(orc the Diane Ke1loRSt . a notan• public. person~ay appeared Jack A. ~'anPae~etthen aitd Arles ?7. ~'anPaece¢hEa 1:rtoyn ar ident::ied to me t, be the person ~ !t.hose name ~ are. suhc;rihed to the within instrumem. artd a:ita~ledged to me that ~ he fit, executed same. \otan PtJblic: ~--i Raid:ng.at:~ K~tr.•t. ID ! `T EXPIR.4TtOti ~AIE: ~ - ' 't ~ ~' J 9 ,. ' /• t STATE 7F IDAHO. COt'`.Tl' OF~IC~_ I .e~~ :::.ii•::hat this instrument Nu fled (or record az the reque~ o` . - _ . ,... .0. ._~ -- az ~ .~ minutes pas ~ b'clocl- i] m., this. i ~,4.i ~ des` °( CL (J ~ is 19' '.:n ^. ~ offt.:. xnC dui• re•orded in B.rl• of D~~s a: pa_e ~ 1.i .~: i 9 r ~ ~ , ~ e.J 1' ~°t, Ex-0(ti;t t Rerorder . r. ~ ~~ ~ gs ~~ I` ~_ ~ ~_~ ~ ~{ rC .i i t ~ ~ Deput`•. Fr_s 5 ~~. Sat: to - ~_ t*; , ` . • • ' ~' Ea to est State Street Bot.e. 11aho S?"0. !]0: i :361'00 ,• 6ba for:h Cove Road / Rase. ISa1o 63'03. i:0.a13"-."00 • • :~ WARRA\TY DEED 6965901 E_ FOR V.4LL'E RECEI\'Et) JOHN W. and CAXDT J. 'r.OY_4.'~ (hus:znd and cite) GR,t,\TOR(s), Cxsfdc) hcrcby GFA':T, BARGAIN. SELL and CO~~'E1' a-:~ DO~:,t7 F. and RAE JEAu HO?±3.\ (husband and s:ife) GRAXTEEt~), whose current address is: ?a25 ,. yteridian Rd. , Nfr~=~4~t,ID ~3G`'Z the followire described real pmxrt} in nde Ccu^tc. State of 11a`,e. ~ more parti:ularly dee~ribed as follows. to wit ,;n undivided (!) o-e-`alt interest r.ocset.ci^.3 at a point ltf3,43 rods Borth of the southeast corner of the southeast qusrtez cf the northeast quarter of Secticn 1, Tot.TShip 3 Xa=.`. Range 1 tiest, of t'r.e 3oise-yferidian, in Ada County, State ~f Idaho, and tunr.i^g thence hest 105 r:::s thence South 21.?6 znd 10/11"rods; thence East l05 roes to the east lire of said northeast quarter of Section one; thence ~o:th alo^.g said section line 21.76 and 10/11 rods to the place of beginning. Except that parcel of land lying in the ~E} of Section 1, Tocr.ship 3 forth. Range 1 I:est, Boise-`feridian, Ada County, Idaho described: Beginning at t`te east quarter corner of said Section 1; thence ~ort'n along the east side o: .Section 1 a distance of 1466.4t~ feet, tc the real point of beginnir.5; thence ti,'est a distance of 330 feet; thence \ortn a distance of 132 feet; thence Ea_t a distance of 330 feet to a point on the east lice ~'_ said Section 1; thence South along the east line of Sectio^. ', a distance of 132 feet t:~ the real point of beginning. Except that portion lying within the right of cay for count;• road tea=.en1~~ re:erred to as *ieridian Road over and across the easterly pott~oa of said premises. TO HAVE A\D TO HOLD the said premtsa. with th:ir appun:aanca unto [r.: said Grantcas). snd Granteets) hrss and assigns foreser. And the said Gramor(s) doa(do; h:reby cosenart to a^:d u:a::.`.: said Gran:ccis), that Grantorts) is'ue the owner(s) in f^-t: simple of said premises: that said premiss are free from all e:t:umbrances. E::CEPT rhos: to which this com•e~an~e is expressly rtadr subject and those mac:. suffered or don- by ti:: Gr3n:::(s): and subject to resNations. restzic- ticns, d:dica[ions, easements, right of way and agrc:m:nts. iif an}1 of r::.rd. and several taxes and assess^:nts. (in:ludes irrigation and utiliry assessments. if any) for the cur-,ent year. Nhich are not ~a du: and pa~a`+le. and that G:aatotis) will wa:- rant and defend the same L•om all lawful claims whaaoe~er. Dated: Aprill 13, 189 ~~~/art,t~--- /JOHN W • H0:$fi. l./ ,; ,l ~ I .i----~-= -~ ~ • ~ =-~--- CA_'~~T J . 30`_x`( ~ . ~~ ACK.~OW'LEDGE>1EKT - hdi~idual STATE OF TT)ANn . Counq of Ala , ss On this~~t,)~_day of aoril . in ttie s•~ of 1989 .before me t'.-:e undetsi~^.ed. . a no:arn oubtic. prrsonall~• appeared John M'. do~an and Candv .T. Homan . _.._. i:n~w n or idemified~tq~Jtoxl~E.genon ~ +hc<..narne s ate <nh<_-r,'hehio're witltip ins(tument, and a,-:nouledged to m: that STATE OF IDAHO. COC\"TY OF~j~~/ 1 h,• ti~ ti.at this rostrum=nt was turd for record at ;h: requ:st c~ ~~~~~,/ at ~~f~ ......inu:a past /I o'c ~m.. this ,.J j ~ ~ day _f /,~~~"~,,. Ic 19~~t: m~ a`::" ~ i~ duh record:d ;n B.~~Y of Dees a• p~~~ ~x-0fft:io Re:oraet _ / D:pun. Fees S / ~~ ~tatl to: ~ f' t fte~e};~ e~t~tcttRe. the f Nd;.ary 'Qublic: ~~ t Rending' at::~.12'sL' EXPtgs+.i 10\ DpTE;, Plc) ~~? T,~. ~ C;>: _.:.:~ i• Or" ADA C,O:JNTY 621 Hest State Street ~ Bout, Idaho 6:"02 / CO61 :S(~o7tX1 858 tionh Cole Road /Bon:. Idaho 63":u / LA51 3 •= 00 ~~, ,., ..,r ' . • RE~lUEST FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PRELIMINARY PLAT AHD/OR FINAL PLAT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSION: A request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerks possession no later than three days following the •regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at the monthly meeting following the month the •request was made. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:00 P. M., Thursday following the Planning and Zoning Commission action. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Annexation and Subdivision. Greenhaven Estates 2. General Location, West of Meridian Road, north of Cherry Lane 3. Owners of record, JOB W• and Candy J. Homan; and Donald F. and 2835 N. Meridian Road Rae Jean Homan Address. . Zip 83642 Telephone RRR_~~1L_ 4. Applicant, The Development Group Address, 1903 S. Gull Cove Place Meridian, ID 83642 5. Engineer, Gary A. Lee, P.E. /L.S. Firm J-U-B EN ,TtvF~S, Inc Address 250 S. Beechwood, Suite 201 Zip 83709 Telephone 376-7330 6. Name and address to receive City billings: Home The Develorxnent 1903 S. Gull Cove Place Group Address Telephone 887-5622 Meridian, ID 83642 PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECHLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres 14.85 2. Number of lots 4D 3. Lots per acre 2.7 4. Density per acre 2.7 (gross) 5. Zoning Classificationcs~ R-4 • • 6• If the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridian City Limits but within the jurisdictional mile, whaj is the existing zoning classification RT (Ada County 7• Does the plat border a potential green belt No &. Have recreational easements been provided for No 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City_ ~'es Explain A 10' wide pedestrian a ~AG~ pacom } connect property to west. "'~~ 10. Are there proposed dedications of common areas? Yas Explain Entryway Common Area and Landscape Easement For future parks? NO Explain 11. What school(s) service the area Meridian propose any agreements for future school sites No You Explain 12. Other proposed amenities to the City XX Weter Su 1 PP Y Fire Department Other XX Sewer Explain A new water distribution, extension of existing sewer lines. Z3. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial or comba.nation) Residential 14. Type of Dwelling(s) Single Family, Duplexes. Multiplexes. nth°=" Single-family 15. Proposed Development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot(s), $,000 sq. ft. b. Minimum square footage of structure(s) 1,400 sq, ft. min. c. Are garages provides for, Yes square footage d• Are other coverings provided for No e. Landscaping has been provided for Yes Describe Within the common lots at entry c2) t • • f. Trees will be provided for Yes Trees will be maintained YeS - By Homeowners' Association g. Sprinkler systems are provided for Yes h. Are there multiple units No Type remarks i. Are there special set back requirements No Explain j. Has off street parking been provided for Yes .Explain Garages and driveways k. Value range of property $90,000 - $140,000 1. Type of f financing f or development FHA . VA m c,n~,pnt;,,n"1 m. Protective covenants were submitted NO . Date w~final plat 16. Does the proposal land lock other property No Does it create Enclaves NO STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be constructed to standards as required Dy Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineejr. All sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. ~. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 3. ~. J. 6. Development will connect to City services. Development will comply with City Ordinances. Preliminary Plat will include all appropriate easements. Street names must not conflict with City grid system. (3) YS f .~. , r ~ ~# ~i~~i= ~~ ~q4 ~~~ ~ - N.arorirw. x+er ~ ~ T I I ~ 1~°~ E ~~ ~~~_~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~F~~ ~ i ~ ~ ~~ ~ _ ~ ~~ ~r ~ ~ jy• = i ~ I a$~§ ~~ ~t~~! ~~ 32 P` ~r i I; ~ ~~ f ~i ~ t ~ f S " ~~ ~w ~ 'w' 5~ F = 1n * L E t a ~! 2 t [ Ie r I t~=i~t~~~~~~ mm E~ ~~ r! ; o N ^ 3Sq Z Z i I ~S! ~~6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m w ` ~ ~ ~ R ` N r i _~ ~~~ ~~ r ~ ~~ ~ E ~ ~ ~~~ w ! I Q N ~ -. t7 .~ _ r• ~~ ~~ # g ~ ,~ ~ ~~,.~~ e _ i ~ t V I ~ r,.r ~ €~E ~IS c N. W. 3R0 A ~ ~ ~ ~ t I C ~ ~~ ~ i X I ~ # KIn~ ' `t 1E s~aa ~ .w ~ ~ 1'' a~~F ~ ~ p 5 N I ~~ ~ .w .w -} ~ g. M: ~~°a g€ e I a ~g~~ o = r A nr O ~ ti D E N E e N A UI 2 ~ ~ C D C N '~ m N O C ~ ~ m y < ~~gppp~p ~~sE~ Z i a ! z p XL ! s~. m ~ M v ; i ~g~~ s 1$ 4 E a j R~" '~ ~:,i~ ,w , x ,~ ~ ~i I ~ a ~ ~ I !~ ~ ~ ~j I ~.. ,- ~ ~~ ~~ yy ,.> I~ ~~~ ~~ ~ R ~- .u ~~~ ~ ~e _ Z A m dab N, itt4N q • '-A a (~ N. MERIDIAN ROAD ` ~ A ~r/ICINITY MAP ~ . ~ 3 -.. _. r. _____.__ _. ----------- .. 1 _.. ~. SAP 1 4 i~4 PROPOSED I~IOMAN ANNEXATION & Q GRENMIAVEN ES TES SUBD. '~ _ ~~ti6~ -- M S ., - S~ R pSSER ------- 8 6 ~~ S < ~ 2 I ~ ~ '3 ~ ~ 12 ~ u ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ 16 a ~ i 3 .~ ~ Y ~ I ~ 2 > ~ I ~ ~ I I ~ -f ~~~~ ~ ~,~-, o ~ , r-_T-- ~9 J - W CLAIRE `~'~ '~- ~ ~ ~I _ ~ ~ ~D: T ~ '_ ~ ~ '~4A(~SB --~- ' Y LANE ` L ;; ~ -1 ~ i ~ ~ ~ 12 3 ~ 14 ~ _ ~. ,E i '7 ~ 18 ~~ i '.3 ~ ~2 ~ ~~ r~ ~ S ~ ~ B ~ ' ~ 6 5 ~ ~ > >~ . __ _ ~' _ b ~ i ' '~ - r ~- _t --- .._. __.._ __ 132.5 - - - - - . - 2 20 9 j~8 ~' ~~6 `_ `- 15 i 4 13 - !:~3 u ~ IC 9 8 7 ,F S 4 3 2 i- vAW ! "~~ ~ ~ ` W'. 'NOODBURY ~ R. ~ ~~ W. WOOD BURY pR. - 2a, ~~ 12 i! I^ 9 8 ~ 6 5 ~12 II 10 9 7 .6 5 - 2 v I a V B• 3 ~ ~ a p . ~ ~ (~ 32 ~ 2 ~ ~ 3 ~~~, ~ Y'1 EKBUR~ 23 ~ ~ ; W '~ X30 28 27 29 TE Fl~ 26 2 RY! 2PAR z0 ~ ~e ,~ 17 16 Is la ~ ,~ 'Q` \5 _ ' vL~ ie I' 1P '9 zo a zz zo _ ~ i 1 i i ~ yy, NlATERBURY DR _ W WATER9URY WY I j 6 j S ~~ a ( t 2 ~ ~ ; 2a ~ 23 ~ ~ 3 21 ~ 2C Is ,6 I7 ~ 16 15 3 t j 7 , I g, Iz a 10 9 e ~ 5 s o Z ~ ~ ~ ~ 5, ~ 8 iz ANOR N .8 ER1 7 6 io 4 ' 3 2 i 12 j~ II ~ 10 ~9 ~ ~ g ; ~ a , ~ ~M ! '(~s i f , 24 ~'~ w. CHRISFIELO DR p~D~~ Mq ~--~___ ~ a NpR , ~,__' \ \' ~~ z2 2 i ~ 20 18 `i S I'~ i ~ N~ ~\ n _ IS ~6 / ~ v ~ I ..y I x i ~~ ~~~R •~ R ^ ;~ i RI ~T RI t • • REGJUEST FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PRELIMINARY PLAT AND/OR FINAL PLAT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSION: A request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerks possession no later than three days following the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at the montrily meeting following the month the request Was made. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:00 P. M., Thursday f ollowing the Planning and Zoning Commission action. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Annexation and Subdivision, Greenhaven Estates 2. General Location, West of Meridian Road, north of Cherry Lane 3. Owners of record, John W. and Candy J. Homan; and Donald F. and 2835 N. Meridian Road Rae Jean Homan Address, . Zip 83642 Telephone RRR_~~1L_ 4. Applicant, The Development Group Address, 1903 S. Gull Cove Place Meridian, ID 83642 5. Engineer, Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. Firm J-U-B EN,TN~, , rnc_ Address 250 S. Beechwood, Suite 201 Zip 83709 Telephone 376-7330 6. Name and address to receive City billings: Hame The Development Group Address 1903 S. Gull Cove Place Telephone 887-5622 Meridian, ID 83642 PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres 14.85 2. Number of lots 4D 3. Lots per acre 2.7 4. Density per acre 2.7 (gross) 5. Zoning Classification(s) R-4 r • • • x 6• If the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridian City Limits but within the jurisdictional mile, what is the existing zoning classification RT (Ada County) ~. Does the plat border a potential green belt No 8. Have recreational easements been provided for No 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City ~'es Explain A 10 wide pedestrian acceGC Paacmcnl- W;)~ connect property to west. 10. Are there proposed dedications of common areas? Yas Explain Entryway Common Area and Landscape Easement For future parks? NO _ Explain 11. What school(s~ service the area Meridian do you propose any agreements for future school sites No Explain 12. Other proposed amenities to the City XX Water Su 1 PP Y Fire Department Other XX Sewer Explain A new water distribution, extension of existing sewer lines. 13. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial ur combination) Residential 14. Type of Dwellingts) Single Family, Duplexes, Multiplexes. oth°~' Single-family 15. Proposed Development features: a. Minimum square footage of lotts), 8,000 sq, ft. b. Minimum square footage of structure(s) ~-400 sq, ft, min. c. Are garages provides for. Yes square footage d. Are other coverings provided for No e. Landscaping has been provided f or Yes Describe Within the common lots at entry (2) • • f. Trees will be provided far Yes Trees will be maintained YeS - By Homeowners' Association g. Sprinkler systems are provided for Yes h. Are there multiple units No Type remarks i. Are there special set back requirements No Explain j. Has off street parking been provided for YeS .Explain Garages and driveways k. Value range of property $90,000 - $140,000 1. Type of financing for development FHA, VA HUD onv nt;nnal m. Protective covenants were submitted No . Date w/final plat 16. Does the proposal land lock other property NO Does it create Enclaves No STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be constructed to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. ~. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 3. 4. J. 6. Development will connect to City services. Development will comply with City Ordinances. Preliminary Plat rill include all appropriate easements. Street names must not conflict with City grid system. (3) • ANNEXATION/ZONIN FQLTFST AFFIDAVIT We, John W. and Candy J. Homan, husband and wife, and Donald F. and Rae Jean Homan, husband and wife, do hereby certify that we are record owners of a part of the land described as the "Homan Annexation" in an application for Annexation & Zoning Application being submitted to the City of Meridian for consideration. We further state that we hereby officially request annexation of said property into the Corporate City Limits of the City of Meridian, Idaho. In addition, we hereby state and certify that the subject property will be posted one week before the public hearing stating that the above-mentioned applications with the City of Meridian have been made. Dated this _ ~lO ~~ . day of September, 1994. t.~. J .Homan Candy J. Homa STATE OF IDAHO ) ss. County of Ada ) ON THIS ~~day of S.e said State, personally appeared a,-~ /P~ e .eta ~ ~rh~ ~,( onald F. Ho Rae Jean H ~~~' , 19 9~ ,before me, a notary public in and for known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is (are) subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that ~e~ executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. My Notary Commission Expires ~7J eC ~' . / 9 9 ~ My Notary Bond Expires ~~L 5' , 19~ Notary Public for Idaho Residing at ,~p ~~' ~ ,Idaho i P-93194 KC/DK V~~ARRAl~`TY DEED 891553'7 FOR VALUE RECEIVED JACK A. VA's PAEPEGHE*1 and ARLa M. VAS P.'~EPDC~iE`1, HJ:aD3r`d and SVife GRAKTOR(s), does(do) hereby rRANT, BARC~AIN, SELL and CONVEY unto JO'-'V W. y0,1~~ and Cif\'DY J. Ht7~I~\, Husband end HifP GRANTEE(S), whose current address is: 3835 .north ~:eridian Road, ~4e: ~a~an, ID A3E~~3 the following described real property in Coun , Sr<te of Idaho, more panicularly described as follows, to M•It: "~ CO^•rL~.\CI\G AT A POL\'T 103. ~3 ROUS FORTH OF TF~ SOC:? -'SST CC~R\~ OF THE SOLTIIEAST QC.~RTER OF THE \'ORTTiE.\5T Q(:,aRTER OF SECTIO\ 1, :GI~ISHIP 3 :`:ORTH, RAGE 1 AFST, OF 'f HE 80I:~E-~LxRIDIF+.\, I\ AAA C~C:.:Y, STATC OF ID.aHO, A\~ RC11LtiG :ICE ItiEST 105 RODS TElr`CE SOCTH :1.76 .1\'D 10/11 RODS; :'=_`:CE EAST 105 RODS TU T'rIE EAST LI\'E OF S.3ID VORT-~~ST Q.:aR':'~ OF SECTION O\~; :ii1;1CE tiORTH AIA~iG S.r1ZD SECTION LI:i~ 31.7,1 ~\~ 10~ 11 RODS ~ T?-D; PLACE C>F SEGI\1I\G. Eal'EPT Tii~T PORTiO:~ LYItiG HZTtiIV Tl-:£ RIGiiT OF I~~Y ~'OR CCC\"PY NO.~.D CY~`np\ZY REFr'~tR..'D aU 1S .`'~IDIr11 ROaI~ Cri'~2 A\'D a.=-:JSS THE EASTF.rtLY POFTIOti OF SAID PR..~SES. TO HAVE .4ND TO HOLL' t.`:e said premises, Nith their appunenances unto the said Grantee(s,. and Grantees) L•eirs and assigns forever. And the said Grantor(s) dcestdo) hereby covenant to and with the said Grantee(s), t`tat Grantor(s) s are the o•anerts) in fx simple of said premises: that s: id pr:miscs are free from aL' en:umbrances. EXCEPT hose to which this com•eyaece is expressly made subject and those made, sulfured or dorn: by the Grantee(sl: and subject to res:n•ations, restric- tions. dedications, easements. right of way and aereements, lif any) of record, and gen:ral taacs and assessrnen[s. (ircludes irrigation rnd utiliq• rssessments. if any) for the current .:ear, which „re not zet due and payable. arJ that Granter(s) will uar- rat,t and defend the same from all lawful claims whatscezer. Dated: 9pri1 10 ?9 89 Jacic .`,. i'an Paerx=c,`ts:t ~'i ~~ i 1. _~ ~-• ~-- ~ ! ~„E' lire • _ . ACi:~O'A'LEDGEh1E\T -Individual STATE OF IDAHO . Coutm of Ada . ss On :.tics 10th day of Acril' . in the dear of_1989 .before the Diane Kello¢st , a notan puFlic, perso,a!Iy appeared Jacw A. CanPae~e¢he~ and Arla M_ CanPaeeeRhea l:nc+yn or id~m::ied to me t~. F+e the person S_ v.hose name ~_dZP_ su~c.rihed to the within instrumem. and ui;twz.ledeed to me :hat i he fir. executed ~\~same. \otan Pyblic: ~ -" Resid:cg.az:` Kur.l. ID I ~_ E\PIRAT10ti~AIE: ~- ~ 't/~~!9I /, t - - ~ STATE nF ID.aHO. COC'`.Tl" OF~IC~ I n:cdz c::.ifi_: that this instrument was filed for record az the az ~ ~ minutes past ~ b'clt~A >, m., this.. ~ C`E'/ i dad of C'i_ (~ i.:~ 19` '.:n ^. ~ offs.. and dui• re-o:ded in B.x~l of Dx~s a: pa~- -- Ez-0ftia.t Reorder T` r. ~ ~! ^. v Depun~. Fr_s 5 ~~. Sal: to ~_ - _j fiP 1 ~ '~-t- a; ,~ ~ , ~ , ~~ .. OF ADn G"::\'Y E.1 tt 61 Sla,e Sum Bore. ISaho 5.'J] U051 :36'00 BbE ~orh Cole Road i Hose. Idaho 63"OS , i;0.a) 3-'-.'00 • • WAR:ZAtiTY DEED 6965901 FOR VALI'E RECEI\'Ell JOHN W. and CAX01 J. NOy.A.1 (husband and wife) GRAKTOR(s), dxs(de) hereby GFA':T. BARGAI\. SELL ar.d CO\\'E1' a^:~ DO\AL~ F. and RAE JEA*' HO~L1.\ (husband and wife) GR4\TEEtS). whose current address is: 1°25 ,. `feridian Rd. ~ r6ri:f/4il,I~ ~3E`'Z the followirg da:ribed real pmxrty in ,qda Ccunq. State o. l~ihe, more parti;ularly dec~ribed as follows. w wit: An undivided (~) oce- elf interest r.os~er.cin3 at a point 13,43 rods !:orth of the southeast corner of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 1, Tos.•nship 3 dart^, Range l lest, of the 3oise-Meridian, in Ada County, State ~f Idaho, and runr.iag thence lest 105 r:~s - - thence South 21.?6 end 10/11'rods; thence East 105 rods to the east lire of said northeast quarter of Section one; thence ~ozth along said section line 21.76 and 10/11 rods to the place of beginning. Except that parcel of land lying in the !:E} of Section 1, Township 3 ~ortF„ Range 1 hest, Boise-Meridian, Ada County, Idaho described: Beginning at the east quarter corner of said Section 1; thence ':orth 21ens~ the ezst side of .Section 1 a distance of 1466.40 feet, tc the real point of beginning; thence lest a distance of 330 feet; thence ~ort,~ a distance of 132 feet; thence ra_t a distance of 330 feet to a point on the east lice cf said Section 1; thence South along the east line of Sectio^. 1, a riistar.ce of 132 feet t~ the real point of beginning. Except that portion lying within the'ril;ht of way for count;• road coa::.enly referred to as Meridian Road over and across the easterly portica of said preWises. TO HAVE A\J TO HOLD the said premises. with th:ir appurteaanc:s into ci:: said Granteets). snd Grsntens) heizs and ataigns foreser..And the said Grantor(s) doesGioi hereby cotcna:.t to and N::.'::.`: said vGrau[rrisi, that Grantor(s) is'are the owner(s) in f^.e simple of said premises; that said premises are free from all encumbrances, E':rEPT those to Which this com•eyance is expressly madr subject and those mad:. suffered or don- by the Gran::e(s): and subject to rese:~ations. restric- ticns, dedications, easements, right of u•ay and afire:meets. (if an}) of rec. rd. and general taxes and assessments, (includes irrigation and utility assessmenu. if am) for the current dear, which are not het due and payatile, and that Grantoris) will u•a:- rant and defend the same from all lawful aai;ns v,haaoe~er. Dated: April 13, 189 //~~ ~_ _ JOHN W. HOMA. ~. ~ ACK.~OW'LEDGEUEKT - lndi~idual STATE OF 1RAF10 .County of Ada , ss On this...~3th_day of P.pril , in the year of 1989 .before me.t?^e undersl~ned. . a noary public. personally app~tedJohn W. rlo^en and Candv ,I. _ __ HoIDan. ...,,...,,.,~,~ _.__. fin~wn or idemified te~slto:x.tf~F.genon ~ +hcsc name 5 ere subs,^nbed_~o're w itttip ktsftyment, and ac-nowiedged to m: that C fief;: e~c~acttRQ the t Ktgary flubllic: ~~~ Rei'iding' 3t: ~ ~ P.:, i ere EXPlR~ j IOV. DATE;, `. xn ,. / l ..i-.-z-~., ~~ -;-- ~--~-~------ CA.'s'D1 J . 30`L~~f v STATE OF 1DAH0. COL':CTY OF~~~.~~ 1 h:r-'•• ti~ ti.at this instrum=nt was tii:d for record xt the requ:st ~~ J~~(/ at .. nu:a past ~l o'c ~m.. this /.i~~ 6 ~ day ..f ~'~~~l.cs/s 19~Gfc m~ o.°.:_ ~ %nd dull recorded :n B.~}+ of D:_9s a: p+,c .~~f~i~ ~?.. r' 1 l/~ x-0ffi:io Re:ordn i. , Fees S Mail to: ~ . / . OF ADA C.O:JNTY 821 Hest State Street / Bois;, Idaho £S?OZ % ~'OS1:3f-o700 848 nonh Cole Road / Bois;, Idaho Ei'(u / (:AS13 ~ "-2'00 l • • ~~-u~B~. Engineers Surveyors Planners Project: 18857 Date: September 14, 1994 HOMAN ANNEXATION LAND SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY All that certain real property situated in Section 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., Ada County, State of Idaho, described as follows: A portion of the NE 1/4 of Section 1; further described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap being the East one quarter corner of Section 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M.; thence North 00°17'24" East, 1,724.96 feet along the East Section line, (formerly known as North, 103.43 rods) to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 89°19'43" West, 1,735.54 feet (formerly known as .West, 105 rods) parallel to and 933.40 feet South of the North line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1; thence South 00°07'18" West, 381.18 feet, (formerly known as South, 21.76 and 10/11 rods) parallel with and 924.00 feet East of the West line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1; thence South 89°27'04" East, 1,734.40 feet (formerly known as East, 105 rods) along the North line of Lansbury Lane Subdivision, as filed in book 64, page 6499 of Plats, Ada County Records; thence North 00°17'24" East, 377.53 feet, (formerly known as North, 21.76 and 10/11 rods) along said East line of Section 1 to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; Said parcel contains 15.11 acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO: All existing road rights-of-way and easements of record or appearing on the above-described parcel of land. Prepared by: J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. GAL:ls Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. l ~~-uJ Engineers Surveyors Planners Project: 18857 Date: September 14, 1994 GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIVISION LAND SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY All that certain real property situated in Section 1, T.3N., R.lW., B.M., Ada County, State of Idaho, described as follows: A portion of the NE 1/4 of Section 1, as recorded under Instrument No. 8965901 on April 13, 1989, in Ada County records, further described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap being the East one quarter corner of Section 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M.; thence North 00°17'24" East, 1,724.96 feet along the East Section line, (formerly known as North, 103.43 rods); thence North 89°19'43" West, 30.00 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 00°17'24" West, 377.53 feet, (formerly known as South, 21.76 and 10/11 rods) parallel to said East line of Section 1, to a point being the Northeast corner of Lansbury Lane Subdivision as filed in book 64, page .6499 of Plats, Ada County Records; thence North 89°27'04" West, 1704.40 feet along said Lansbury Lane Subdivision, to a point that is 924.00 feet East of the West line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 1; thence North 00°07'18" East, 381.18 feet, (formerly known as North, 21.76 and 10/11 rods) parallel with said West line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, to a point being 933.40 feet South of the North line of said Northeast Quarter of Section 1; thence South 89°19'43" East, 1,705.54 feet parallel to said North line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; Said parcel contains 14.85 acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO: All existing road rights-of-way and easements of record or appearing on the above-described parcel of land. Prepared by: J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. Cy ~ 3~>~~ `~~q~~s~ly,,~o OF ,~~'' GAL:ls Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. • PROPERTY OWNERS LIST GREENHAVEN ESTATES HOMAN ANNEXATION PROJECT NO. 18857-01 September 13, 1994 Bartell, Richard & Diane Davis Rt. 2 Box 25C Salmon, ID 83467 Barton, John K. & Leta J. 355 W. Ustick Meridian, ID 83642 Boise Valley Construction, Inc. 10040 W. Stardust Drive Boise, ID 83704 Elliott, Gerald V. & Nancy 5652 N. Crimson Way Boise, ID 83703 Lifestyle Homes, Inc. 264 S. Cole Rd. Boise, I D 83709 McCutchen, Inc. 8221 W. Brynwood Boise, I D 83704 Moffatt, Robert W., Jr. & Gale 1098 Carmen Ave Boise, ID 83704 L Sanford, John C. & Gayla J. Trustees for Sanford Trust 2880 Venable Meridian, ID 83642 Fern, Richard J. & Gloria A. 2790 N. Meridian Meridian, ID 83642 Flaten, Robert M. 2338 W. Chateau Dr. Meridian, ID 83642 Gray, Lawrence E. & Goldie L. 2980 N. Meridian Meridian, ID 83642 Hatchett, James F. & Patricia L. 445 W. Ustick Meridian, ID 83642 Haven Trust Organization 2700 N. Meridian Rd. Meridian, ID 83642 Statewide Construction, Inc. 4225 S. Riva Ridge Way Boise, ID 83709 Sweet, Daniel F. & Celeste T. 2975 N. Meridian, Rd. Meridian, ID 83642 Sweet, Raleigh G. & Ida T. 3001 N. Meridian Rd. Meridian, ID 83642 Titmus, Greg B. & Robyn G. 184 S. Cole Rd. Boise, ID 83709 Williams, Cris D. & Maria A. 4185 S. Linder Meridian, ID 83642 Jackson, William A. & Jacqueline 4655 Lewis & Clark Meridian, ID 83642 ~ , ~ J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. ~~ • ~ • ~ , ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS J 250 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, ID 83709-0944 208/376-7330 FAX: 208/323-9336 September 15, 1994 Ms. Shari Stiles Zoning Administrator City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, ID 83642 Dear Ms. Stiles: RE: HOMAN ANNEXATION/ZONING The Development Group - Applicant Enclosed for your review and processing are the necessary documents as established by the City of Meridian Ordinances for an Annexation/Zoning application. As stipulated by said ordinance, please find enclosed the following: 1. A copy of two Warranty Deeds showing title vested in John and Candy Homan, and Donald Homan. 2. A notarized request for the annexation and amendment from the titled owners. 3. A written legal description of the subject describing the total parcel of land to be of the property and Rae Jean zoning property annexed. 4. One copy of a concept map (Preliminary Concept Plan of the proposed Greenhaven Estates Subdivision) at a scale of 1" = 60' of the property to be annexed showing the proposed subdivision design. 5. 30 copies of the Application For Annexation and Zoning to an R-4 zone. 6. 30 copies of a Vicinity Map, 11" x 17", not to scale. 7. A list of property owners within 300 feet of the property. 8. A check in the amount of $622.75 from The Development Company for the annexation application fee ($400 + $15/acre * 14.85 acres). 9. A written narrative prepared by Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. of J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc., describing the annexation request and the proposed development. is ~~ «~ • ~~-u Ms. Shari Stiles Engineers Surveyors Planners September 15, 1994 Page 2 Please review the enclosed information and schedule a Public Hearing for the next available Planning & Zoning Meeting. If you require additional information, please call. Sincerely, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. ~ ~.~-_ ary Lee, P.E./L.S. Project Manager GAL:ls Enclosures cc: The Development Group Project No. 18857 • • ~~-uJ Engineers Surveyors Planners GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIVISION ROMAN ANNEXATION NARRATIVE. Date: September 15, 1994 Prepared by: Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. Boise, Idaho Owners: John W. and Candy J. Homan, Husband and Wife and Donald. F. and Rae Jean Homan, Husband and Wife Developer: The Development Group - Bill Hardt I. DEVELOPMENT LOCATION The Homan property is located in a portion of the NE 1/4 of Section 1, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, B.M., Ada County, Idaho. More particularly, the project lies west of North Meridian Road and north of Cherry Lane. Lansbury Lane Subdivision is located along the southerly boundary. Strasser Farm Subdivision lies to the north. To the north and west lies undeveloped pasture and farmland. II. SITE DESCRIPTION Currently, the site is comprised of approximately 14.85 acres of pasture land. The Onweiler Canal terminates just north of the northeast corner of the parcel and a small irrigation/waste ditch flows along the north end of the property. The parcel also contains-two single-family homes located on the east end. At this time, the property is situated in Ada County and is zoned RT (Rural Transitional). North Meridian Road provides access to the parcel along the easterly boundary with North N.W. 3rd Avenue from existing developments to the south. It is anticipated that a street will be stubbed to the north for future land development. III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The developer plans to request a re-zone of the property to residential R-4. The project will consist of approximately 40 single-family residential lots resulting in a gross density of 2.7 lots per acre. The lot sizes will conform to the City of Meridian Zoning Ordinance for residential developments. This zoning request and annexation will comply with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. • • ~~-u Homan Annexation Narrative Engineers Surveyors Planners September 15, 1994 Page 2 IV. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS A. Sanitary Sewer System: There is an existing public sanitary sewer system on North N.W. 3rd Avenue that will extend into and service the majority of this property. There is also existing public sanitary sewer in North Meridian Road. B. Domestic Water System: It is anticipated that domestic water and fire flows will be supplied by the City of Meridian through the extension of an existing water system located in North Meridian Road. The system would also be tied in at North N.W. 3rd Avenue to the south. A new water distribution system will be constructed within the planned development, which will include the necessary fire hydrants, valves, blow-offs, and appurtenances as required by the State of Idaho Drinking Water Standards. C. Public Utilities: This subdivision will include public utilities, such as electric power from Idaho Power Company; natural gas from Intermountain Gas Company; telephone service from U.S. West Communications; and TV service from T.C.I., a Cable Network. Utility easements will be provided upon each lot to accommodate these public utilities as required. D. Public Streets: All streets will be constructed to Ada County Highway District Standards and Specifications. All streets will be constructed to Collector and Local Street Standards. Storm water drainage for these public streets will be collected and retained on-site in accordance with A.C.H.D. standards. Disposal of storm water into the natural drainage will consist of only flows equal to the pre-development storm water discharge of the property (i.e., the amount of storm water discharged into this drainage will not exceed what is currently flowing into said drainage ditch in its present condition). A landscape lot and landscape easements will be provided along North Meridian Road. These common lots will be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. A variance will be requested to allow Hardt Court to exceed the City minimum culdesac length of 450 feet. ~~ • • ~~-u-B~ Homan Annexation Narrative Engineers Surveyors Planners September 15, 1994 Page 3 E. Irrigation and Drainage: The existing Onweiler Canal and other irrigation ditches will be tiled to continue delivery of irrigation water to neighboring properties. Other smaller irrigation and drainage ditches that deliver water to this parcel only will be abandoned. A pressurized irrigation system will. provide irrigation water to each lot. tentatively planned to be located at of the development. Nampa & Meridian will own and operate the system.. F. Fire Protection be constructed to A pumping station is the northeast corner Irrigation District As mentioned earlier, the domestic water system will be maintained and operated by the City of Meridian. Part of their service will include the delivery of adequate fire protection. The delivery system will be sized and hydrants placed throughout the development to meet the necessary fire flows as established by the Meridian Fire District. s-u-s #iaas~ ~ • ~ J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. ~~. ~. ~ , ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS 250 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, ID 83709-0944 208/376-7330 FAX: 208/323-9336 September 15, 1994 Ms. Shari Stiles, Planning Director City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, ID 83642 Dear Ms. Stiles: RE: Greenhaven Estates Subdivision Enclosed for your review and processing are the necessary documents as established by the City of Meridian Ordinances for a Preliminary Plat for the above-proposed subdivision. The following application items are included: 1. 30 copies of the Request for Subdivision Approval, .Preliminary Plat Application. 2. 30 copies of the Preliminary Plat, 24" x 36", with concept engineering, at a scale of 1" = 100'. 3. 30 copies of a reduced Preliminary Plat, 8~" x 11". 4. 30 copies of a Vicinity Map, 8~" x 11", at a scale of 1" =.300'. 5. One copy of a written legal description of the subject property. 6. A list of property owners within 300 feet of the property. 7. Preliminary Plat application fee of $734.51. In addition, the proposed subdivision affirms the following Statements of Compliance: 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks will be constructed to ACHD and City of Meridian standards. 2. The proposed subdivision is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive. Plan. 3. The proposed subdivision will connect to City services. 4. The proposed subdivision will comply with City ordinances. 5. The Preliminary Plat includes all appropriate easements. 6. Street names do not conflict with the City grid system. is r~ «~ • ~~-u Engineers Surveyors Planners its . Shari stiles September 15, 1994 Page 2 We wish to have this Preliminary Plat request placed on the next scheduled City Planning & Zoning meeting for consideration. Please review the enclosed documents for completeness as submitted. If you require additional information or have questions, please call me. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, J-U-B GINEERS, Inc. L~ ~-- Gary Lee, P.E./L.S. Project Manager GAL/mep Enclosures CC: Bill Hardt J-U-B # 18857 ~ VICINITY MAP ~ . - ~~ __ _. --- _ _ _ _ _ _ use ~-- i r _ '~' ~~ 1'^ - _ -2 ~ s~~ 1 ~ 1~,4 PROPOS~D ROMAN ANNEXATION & 7 ,IOr. GRENMIAVEN ES TES SUBD. ~~ _ ~~~e~ ~~ - ~ __=~,~~MS ~ - S~RpSSE~ ^ -~ i~ a y:s_.1~~ _.~.~_ ~.: ~' - - 1 " = 300 - ~ ~~Z~ ~ t o s s! s z I ,,/ ,r----- E ~/j ~J~U-B ~ '9 i ~ 4A 2 ~~~ .3 ~' 14 ~ _ ~ .E '7~i8 ~~ I i I ' 3 12 ~ n 1 !G y I ~ i ~ j 5 I ~ ~ 4~ ~ ~ ~-~ ' I I ! ~~_ W CLAIRE ''~ ~ Y L A E_ i ~~ ~ _'-TTT ~' i 3 2 I! ~ J+ - 9 ~ ' ~ 6 S ~ G ~ 7 .b _ ~; _ -~ ~ ._ __.. _._._ ~ __-- >32. 5 - -~ 2~ 120 )+9 ~ i ~~6 15 +4 IS ~$ n_, t0_ ~9_ 19 ~7.__I6 _~5 .a S 2 oaa \ .~8 ..._ _. - I- --- .~.r.. + 24 ' W. WOODBURY R. '~ W. WOODBURY pR. ! 12 +! I~ I9 8 T 6 5 ? n ~' +2 II 10 9 8 T +6 S ,4 ~ + V8. 3 1 sz + z a0 ~3 9~BG~a/ W Ekb~RY za -~ 1 !~ ~,y ~ F1~R PAR 0. 2 1 ' ~~~~ , - IT le ~9 zo a zz za _ b0 ~ 29 ~ 28 ~ ZI 26 ~ aa 2a ~ 23 ~ 2_'' 20 18 18 IT 16 IS 14 13 ~~~ +~ +1' yy vJATERBURY OR.' yy 'vVATER9URY WY + I ' I 6 + 5 ~ 4 I ~ 2 ~ ~ 24 ~I 23 ~ ~ 2! 20 19 +B IT ~ 16 ~ r5 ~ i 7 j ~ 3 , ~, 12 U 10 9 B 7 6 ~ 5 ' 4 j I 13 ~~ 25 S, i B 7 6 ~ 4 3 2 ~ + . 2 ! + i +0 ~~ 9 ~ ~~ v ! ~ ', N .B ~ 6 ~ 3 o S ERI O ~ z` W. CHRISFIELD pR MfRJpJ,~ N Ei i ' ~\ `~ 22 2+ 20 19 IS l4 I IS ~ ~ N~B , J1' ~dR07 -R ~i RI ~. ~T RI i MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: NOVEMBER 9.1994 APPLICANT: THE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 6 REQUEST: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR GREENHAVEN ESTATES AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: i~~ s -~. ~'~ ` .~~ w ~,5~ ~~~ ~~~ ~`~ ~ ~~~ ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLACING AND ZONING COMMISSION HOMAN AND THE DEVELOPMENT GROUP GREENHAVFN ESTATES ANNEXAT3O1i AND ZONING PORTION OF THE N 1/2 NE 1/4 3E, SECTION 1, T.3N., R.lE MERIDLAB, IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT i~HD CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for consideration on October 11, 1994, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the Council having heard and taken oral and written testimony and the Applicant not appearing but through Gary Lee, Professional Engineer, and having duly considered the matter, the Planning and Zoni.ayg Commission makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of public hearing on the annexation and zoning was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for October 11, 1994, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the October 11, 1994, hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations; 2. That the property included in the application for annexation and zoning is described in the application, and by this GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 1 • reference is incorporated herein; that the property is approximately 14.88 acres in size; it is on the west side of Meridian Road between Cherry•Lane Road and Ustick Road; that it~is adjacent to Lansbury Subdivision; Strasser Farm Subdivision lies to the north. 3. That the property is presently zoned by the county RT (Rural Transition) and the proposed use would be for R-4 Residential type development. 4. The general area surrounding. the property is used agriculturally and residentially. 5. That the property is adjacent and abutting to the present City limits. 6. The Applicant is not the owner of record of the property, but he has submitted the consent of the titled owners, John W. and Candy J. Homan and Donald F. and Rae Jean Homan. 7. That the property included in the annexation and zoning application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 8. That the parcel of ground is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 9. That the Application requests that the parcel be annexed and zoned R-4 Residential; that the present use of the property is for two. residences and for limited agriculture; that the applicant indicated that the intended development of the property is for R-4 Residential development with houses containing a minimum of 1,400 square feet; that the Applicant has submitted a preliminary plat. GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 2 10. That Gary Lee stated at the hearing that the density would be 2.7 dwellings units per acre, that there would be a 20 foot landscaped buffer along~Meridian Road, that the lots would be approximately 13,000 square feet, that the R-4 requirements would be met, the streets would meet ACRD requirements, that they would request a variance on the cul-de-sac length, that the Onweiler ditch would be used for pressurized irrigation, that the road medium would be landscaped, that the homes would be from 1,400 to 1,800 square feet, and that the City Engineer's comments would be met. 11. It is also stated in the Application that Onweiler canal and other irrigation ditches would be tiled to continue delivery of irrigation water and that other smaller irrigation and drainage ditches that deliver water to this property only would be abandoned; that pressurized irrigation would be constructed to each lot and a pumping station tentatively planned to be located at the northeast corner of the development, which irrigation system would be operated by Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District; that access to the sewer line for purposes of maintenance, is still being worked out with the owner of the property, Mr. Bob Flaten and the developer of Lansbury Lane Subdivision, Mr. Cris Williams. 12. There were property owners in the immediate area that testified objecting to the annexation and zoning of the parcel: a. Rich and Gloria Fern testified that their concerns have to do with the traffic constantly being in front of their property once the development is finished with the flow coming in and out of the complex; that the Ada County Highway District and Shari Stiles have commented there GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 3 • . are an estimated 400 ve3hicle trips per day that will take place; that vehicle lights will be hitting directly onto their duplex and as the vehicles turn the lights will be crossing their entire residence; that- street lighting won't be offensive if proposed; that a concern over their tenants backing out of their residences onto Greenhaven Estates Street; that adequate dumpsters be made available at the construction site to care for blowing debris and that the developer put sound walls and landscape barriers to curtail some of the noise and lessen the visual impact of headlights to preservre privacy. b. Dan Sweet testified regarding the size of the house the developer plans for this development; that the property north of this proposed development has houses in the 2600 square foot range; that when the zoning starts to go down to R-4 the size and price of the homes in the area diminish; that the Commission stick with not real expensive developments and little so so developments; that he too, is concerned about the increase of traffic. c. That John Sanford testified that his 7 1/2 acres east of Vendable Lane, which i.s a private, deeded lane, is landlocked; that he needs access; that he was told Vendable Lane would be wade a through street when the Waterbury Park No. 5 vas being developed; that the engineers for Waterbury Park No. 5 development, Brian Smith, Hubble Engineering, told him they were going to make a stipulation to crass the slough onto Mr. Sanford's property so he would have access into Waterbury No. 5; that now Mr. Smith says this is not true, that they did away with that; that kids are already coming from Lansbury Subdivision chasing his horses which are across the ditch; that Vendab~ie Lane needs to be a public street; that the Ada County Highway District said they figured he would never want access for reasons of development because of the large arena he has for cutting horses; that Mr. Sanford never received notice of Waterbury 5 Subdivision being finally approved and that they are not going to go across the canal like Mr. Sanford was earlier told.. d. That Joe Simunich testified as to the irrigation and the Onweiler Lateral; that on the plat for Lansbury Subdivision the covenants say no irrigation water will be provided to the lots; that now this developer is scheduling pressurized .irrigation; that those established in the area are not likely to give up their water rights; that for years there has been a rotation on that lateral; that the question arises as to how the developer plans to water all these proposed lots on a 12 hour rotation when GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 4 • • water only comes 12 hours out of every 8 days; that when these subdivisions come up, we in the area get a product or ditch or something that is unsatisfactory like fences built right on top of the irrigation line causing people not to have access'to their head gates. e. Chris Williams testified that he liked the density; that he desire restriction of an entrance which included a brick wall, islands in the roadway, that the frontage setbacks be alternated, that the homes should be a minimum of 1,600 square feet. 13. That the property is in an area marked on the Generalized Land Use Map of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as a single family residential area; that in the Comprehensive Plan property inside the Urban Service Planning Area may be developed at greater densities than one dwelling unit per acre. 14. That in the Rural Area section of the Comprehensive Plan, Land Use, Rural Areas, Section 6.3, it does state that land in agricultural activity should so remain in agricultural activity until urban services can be provided. 15. That Meridian has, and is, experiencing a population increase; that there are pressures on land previously used for agricultural uses to be developed into residential subdivision lots. 16. That the property can be physically serviced with City water and sewer if the Applicant extends the lines. 17. Meridian Police Department, Meridian Fire Department, Meridian City Engineer, Meridian School District, the Central District Health Department, Ada County Highway District, Ada County Street Name Committee, Idaho Power, U. S. West and Nampa Meridian Irrigation District did submit comments and such are incorporated GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 5 • herein as if set forth in full. That the Meridian Planning Director did submit comments among which were that a 20.foot minimum landscape strip is required along Meridian Road outside of the proposed right-of-way, all ditches are to be tiled and approval obtained of Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District obtained prior to applying for building permits, that landscaped islands should be placed on the roadway centerline, that a variance was needed for the length of the cul-de-sac, that the property to the south has a minimum house size of 1, 700 square feet, that perimeter fencing is to be installed, and a development agreement is required as a condition of annexation; that the City Engineer commented that the legal description needs to be resubmitted pursuant to Resolution 158, that the seasonal high ground water elevation needs to be determined and a profile of the sub-surface soil conditions was needed, that the irrigation ditches crossing the parcel need to be tiled, that a master street drainage plan needed to be submitted, and that the fire hydrant placement needed to be coordinated with the Water Works Department. 18. It is particularly noted that the Ada County Highway District in its site specific requirements, stated that the stub street shown running to the north should run to the west. 19. That the R-4, Residential District is described in the Zoning .Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 3 as follows: 1R-41 Low Density Residential District: Only Single Family Dwellings shall be permitted and no conditional uses shall be permitted except for Planned Residential Development and public schools. The purpose of the (R-4) District is to permit the establishment of low density single-family GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS .Page 6 • • dwellings, and to delineate those areas where predominately residential development has, or is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, and to protect the integrity of residential areas by prohibiting the intrusion. of incompatible non-residential uses. The (R-4) District allows for a maximum of four ( 4 ) dwelling units per acre and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian. that the R-4 zoning district requires a minimum of 1,400 square feet to be included in houses in that zone; that the Applicant's representative stated that the subdivision applied for would comply with the R-4 requirements. 20. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Residential Policies, Z.lU states as follows: "Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi-family, town houses, apartments, condominiums, etc. ) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities." 21. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Rural Areas, 6.3 c., it states as follows: "Within the Urban Service Planning Area development may occur in densities as low as 3 dwellings per acre if physical connection is made to existing City of Meridian water and sewer service and the property is platted and subdivided . . ~~ 22. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Rural Areas, 6.4, it states as follows: "Residential development is allowed in the rural area provided that said development does not exceed the Rural Residential Agricultural density, unless it is inside the Urban Service Planning Area and City sewer and water is provided, then Low, Medium and High density residential may be considered. All residential development must also comply with the other appropriate sections of this plan." 23. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Housing, Housing Policies, at page 66, it states as follows: GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 7 • "1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile homes, multi-family, town houses arrangements), ." "1.3 An open housing market for all persons, regardless~of race, sex, age, religion or ethnic background." "1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping centers should be encouraged." 24. That there is a population influx into the City of Meridian at the present time which has been going on for some time and is likely to continue; that the land is relatively close to Meridian and economic. conditions are making it difficult to continue farming in the area. 25. That in 1992 the Idaho State Legislature passed amendments to the Local Planning Act, which in 67-6513 Idaho Code, relating to subdivision ordinances, states as follows: "Each such ordinance may provide for mitigation of the effects of subdivision development on the ability of political subdivisions of the state, including school districts, to deliver services without compromising quality of service delivery to current residents or imposing substantial additional costs upon current residents to accommodate the subdivision."; that the City of Meridian is concerned with the increase in population that is occurring and with its impact on the City being able to provide fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services to its current residents and to those moving into the City; the City is also concerned that the increase in population is burdening the schools of the Meridian School District which provide school service to current and future residents of the City; that the City knows that the increase in GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS .Page 8 • population does not sufficiently increase the tax base to offset the cost of providing fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services; and the City knows that the increase in population does not provide sufficient tax base to provide for school services to current and future students. 26. That pursuant to the instruction, guidance, and direction of the Idaho State Legislature, the City may impose either a development fee or a transfer fee on residential property, which, if possible, would be retroactive and apply to all residential lots in the City because of the imperilment to the health, welfare, and safety of the citizens of the City of Meridian. 27. That Section 11-9-605 C states as follows: "Right-of-way for pedestrian walkways in the middle of long blocks may be required where necessary to obtain convenient pedestrian circulation to schools, parks or shopping areas; the pedestrian easement shall be at least ten feet (10') wide." 28. That Section 11-9-605 G 1. states as follows: "Planting strips shall be required to be placed next to incompatible features such as highways, railroads, commercial or industrial uses to screen the view from residential properties. Such screening shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') wide, and shall not be a part of the normal street right of way or utility easement." 29. That Section 11-9-605 H 2. states as follows: "Existing natural features which add value to residential development and enhance the attractiveness of the community (such as trees, watercourses, historic spots and similar irreplaceable amenities) shall be preserved in the design of the subdivision;" 30. That Section 11-9-605 K states as follows: "The extent and location of lands designed for linear open space corridors should be determined by natural features and, GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 9 • to lesser extent, by man-made features such as utility easements, transportation rights of way or water rights of way. Landscaping, screening or lineal open space corridors may be required for the protection of residential properties from adjacent arterial streets, waterways, railroad rights of way or other features. As improved areas (landscaped), semi- improved areas (a landscaped pathway only), or unimproved areas (left in a natural state), linear open space corridors serve: 1. To preserve openness; 2. To interconnect park and open space systems within rights of way for trails, walkways, bicycle ways; 3. To play a major role in conserving area scenic and natural value, especially waterways, drainages and natural habitat; 4. To buffer more intensive adjacent urban land uses; 5. To enhance local identification within the area due to the internal linkages; and 6. To link residential neighborhoods, park areas and recreation facilities." 31. That Section 11-9-605 L states as follows: Bicycle and pedestrian pathways shall be encouraged within new developments as part of the public right of way or as separate easements so that an alternate transportation system (which is distinct and separate from the automobile) can be provided throughout the City Urban Service Planning Area. The Commission and Council shall consider the Bicycle-Pedestrian Design Manual for Ada County (as prepared by Ada County Highway District) when reviewing bicycle and pedestrian pathway provisions within developments. 32. That proper notice was given as required bylaw and all procedures before the Commission were given and followed. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met; including the mailing of notice to owners of property GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS .Page 10 • • within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. 2. That the City of Meridian has authority to annex land pursuant to 50-222, Idaho Code, and Section 11-2-417 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that exercise of the City's annexation authority is a Legislative function. 3. That the CITY COUNCIL has judged this annexation and zoning application under Section 50-222, Idaho Code, Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Meridian City Ordinances, the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the record submitted to it and things of which it can take judicial notice. 4. That all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been complied with. 5. That the Commission may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and State. 6. That the land within the proposed annexation is contiguous to the present City limits of the City of Meridian, and the annexation would not be a shoestring annexation. 7. That the annexation application has been initiated by the Applicant, The Development Group, and the annexation is not upon the initiation of the City of Meridian, but is at the request of the Applicant. 8. That since the annexation and zoning of land is a legislative function, the City has authority to place conditions GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 11 • • upon the annexation of land. Burt vs. The City of Idaho Falls, 105 Idaho 65, 665 P.D 1075 (1983). 9. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616 which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, 11-9-605 M, Piping of Ditches, and Section 11-9-606 B 14., which pertains to pressurized irrigation; that the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer; that the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance; that, as a condition of annexation the .Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address the inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, K, L and prior comments of the previous Planning Director, Wayne Forrey, relating to the lack of adequate recreation facilities and that land set aside for a future park would be desirable, that the City is in need of land set-asides for future public service use; that the development agreement shall, as a condition of annexation, require that the Applicant, or if required, any assigns, heirs, executors or personal representatives, pay, when required, any development fee or transfer fee adopted by the City; that there shall be no annexation until the requirements of this paragraph are met or, if necessary, the property shall be subject to de- annexation and loss of City services, if the requirements of this paragraph are not met. GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS .Page 12 • • 10. That proper and adequate access to the property is available and will have to be maintained; that it is concluded that as a condition of annexation; access to the property now owned by John Sanford shall be provided; that the access shall be sufficient to meet Ada County Highway District street requirements. 11. That since the Applicant's property is in an area marked as a single family residential area, the annexation and zoning Application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and does not conflict with the Rural Areas policies; but the land does border rural farms or ranches and those farms and ranches shall be buffered- and the subdivision covenants shall let the home owners in the proposed subdivision know that the farms and ranches are there and that agricultural uses will, or may, be continued; that this matter shall be addressed in the development agreement. 12. Therefore, based on the Application, the testimony and evidence, the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian it is ultimately concluded that Applicant's property should be annexed and zoned R-4; that the conditions should be those stated above; that such annexation would be orderly development and reasonable if the conditions are met; that the property shall be subject to de-annexation if the requirements of these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are not met. 13. That all ditches, canals, and waterways required to be tiled by City Ordinance shall be tiled as a condition of annexation and if not so tiled the property shall be subject to de-annexation. 14. With compliance of the conditions contained herein, the GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 13 • • annexation and zoning of R-4, Residential would be in~the best interest of the City of Meridian. 15. That if the conditions of approval are not met the property shall be subject to de-annexation. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONER HEPPER VOTED COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE VOTED COMMISSIONER SHEARER VOTED COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI VOTED CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) VOTED RECOMMENDATION The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the Meridian City Council that the property be annexed and zoned R-4 Residential with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and that the Applicant and owners be specifically required to the all ditches, canals and waterways, and install a pressurized irrigation system, as conditions of annexation, and that the Applicant meet all of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian, specifically including the development time requirements and enter into the required development agreement, and that if the conditions are not met that the property be de- annexed. MOTION: GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 14 .. • APPROVED: ~J DISAPPROVED: GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 15 ~ ~ ~ J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. ~~. ~. ~ , ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS '~ 250 S. Beachwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, ID 83709-0944 208/376-7330 FAX: 208/323-9336 October 18, 1994 Ms. Shari L. Stiles Planning & Zoning Administrator City Of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 Dear Ms. Stiles: RE: Preliminary. Plat for Greenhaven Estates The following are our responses to your comments dated October 7, 1994, for Greenhaven Estates. 1. The centerline on Meridian Road will be indicated on the preliminary plat. 2. A 20' landscape adjacent to Meridian Road has been included in the preliminary plat. 3. All ditches which require tiling will be included in the final design which will be reviewed and approved by Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District. 4. ACRD is not requiring any landscape islands in the right-of- way. ACRD is recommending speed control bumps, which we intend to use in our final design. 5. The preliminary plat will be adjusted so that the minimum 40' chord requirement is met on all cul-de-sac lots. 6. The name of the North-South street, N. N.W. 3rd Street, is displayed on the preliminary plat. 7. Roadway widths and radius lengths will be included on the preliminary plat. ~J,u Engineers Surveyors Planners U • Ms. Shari Stiles October 18, 1994 Page 2 8. A variance request for the proposed cul-de-sac length will be submitted prior to the City Council public hearing for the preliminary plat. 9. The houses in 1,800 sq. ft. 10. Perimeter fens in accordance 11. A development Company. this development will be built between 1,400 and of livable space. ping will be included in the final design plans with the development agreement. agreement will be submitted by The Development Having. reviewed your comments and addressing each one, there appears to be no restricting conflicts between the City of Meridian standards and this development of Greenhaven Estates. After review of this response and the updated preliminary plat, it would be greatly appreciated if a recommendation for approval of said preliminary plat of Greenhaven Estates be forwarded to the City Council members.. Thank. you for your assistance on this project questions please let me know. Sincerely, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. -~_ Gar A. Lee, P.E./L.S. Project Manager GAL/mep Enclosures cc.: The Development Company If you have any Project: 18857 t 4 ~ , ~ MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: OCTOBER 11.1994 APPLICANT: _THE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 11 REQUEST: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR GREENHAVEN SUBDMSION AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: COMMENTS FORTHCOMING CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: COMMENTS FORTHCOMING CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CITY FIRE DEPT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: -SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS US WEST: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: ~ a Y ., OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., Clty Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY 0. SMITH, P.E. Clty Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Worka Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROtY SHARI STILES Planner 8 Zoning Atlministratcr JIM JOHNSON Chairman • Planning 6 Zcni*y GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 4. 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/19/94 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning with a Preliminary Plat for Greenhaven Estates BY: The Development Company LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Meridian Road and South of Ustick JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P2 -GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR -RONALD TOLSMA, C/C -BOB CORRIE, C/C -WALT MORROW, C/C _MAX YERRINGTON, C/C -WATER DEPARTMENT -SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT -POLICE DEPARTMENT -CITY ATTORNEY -CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF REC ION(PRELIM & F L PLAT) CITY FILES ATLJCC• /1..J.Di r~ii ~/i YOUR CONCISE .. -:~° v.~..,, . ~.-- - °..° .. ,_ . a.. • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN . ., OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Worka Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Polite Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES r ~ ~. ~planngr 82oning Atlminisva:r. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 ',~:~~ ~ ;~.~,;; '~ ;.~::..<. JIM JOHNSON Phone (208) 88811433 ~ FAX (208) 887813 Chairman • Planning 8 zon:-g Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ .•t~r;!, ~. 1...: ~ GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor ~ ~ - ., -- . , ,- 1 ! Y 'Y ,J, 's L~'~l ~i ~i"rl~d TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 4. 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/19/94 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning with a Preliminary Plat for Greenhaven Estates BY: The Development Company LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Meridian Road and South of Jstick JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P2 TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, CIC MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER /.IT/ DI Ah1A1L~C MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8- FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES ~_ ~ ~ _ ~ , ` OTHER: '7 YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: O~it~`_ ~~ • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA CITY OF MERIDIAN WALTW MIORRO Y ~ Y ~5 ~2 Q ~~ SUPERIITENDENT OF SCHOOLS ~~~ ~~~ Bob L. Haley DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT ~pR EXCF~! Dan Mabe, Finance & Administration 8y ~ (' I _ i. '~~{~j~ ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT C3 ,.. Christine Donnell, Personnel & Instruction C ©F ~iEFfIDIAT<d DIR SheOry Belknap, Elementary Jim Carberry, Secondary Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911 MERIDIAN STREET MERIDIAN,IDAH083642 PHONE(208)888-6701 October 3, 1994 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Preliminary Plat for Greenhaven Subdivision Dear Councilmen: I have reviewed the application for Greenhaven Subdivision and find that it includes approximately 40 homes at a median value of $120,000. We also find that this subdivision is located in census tract 103.11 and in the attendance zone for Chief Joseph Elementary, Meridian Middle School and Meridian High School. The school district may be required to transport elementary students from this subdivision to Ridgewood Elementary or another school that may have capacity, due to overcrowding at Chief Joseph Elementary. School is at 130 of capacity. Using the above information we can predict that these homes, when completed, will house 14 elementary aged children, 10 middle school aged children, and 9 senior high aged students. At the present time Chief Joseph Elementary is at 101$ of capacity, Meridian Middle School is at 139 of capacity and Meridian High The Meridian School District is not opposed to growth in our district, however this subdivision will cause increased over- crowding in all three schools.- There is little opportunity to shift attendance boundaries since the surrounding schools are also well over capacity. Before we could support this subdivision, we would need land available at a minimum price for a school site in this area. The site would need water and sewer services available. In addition we would need to pass another bond issue for the construction of schools. The cost per student for newly constructed schools, excluding site purchase price and offsite improvements, exceeds $5,000 per elementary student and $10,000 per middle or high school student. ~, J • We are in a difficult position and need your help in dealing with the impact of growth on schools. Sincerely, Dan Mabe Deputy Superintendent DM:gr ` ~ • ~~~ ~^ INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE GRENHAVN/DSTECH -LENN .L RHODES, P-esident 10 - 5 - 9 4 SHERRY R. HUGER. Vice President TAMES E. oRUCE. Secretary TO: ACHD Commission DATE: September 29, 1994 FROM: Development Services SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIVISION Meridian - Preliminary Plat; Annexation/Zoning (Developer - The Development Co., 1903 S. Gull Cove Place, Meridian, ID 83642) (Engineer/Surveyor - J-U-B Engineers, inc., Gary Lee, P.E./L.S., 250 S. Beechwood Ave., Suite 201, Boise, ID 83709) PRELIMINARY REPORT - NOT FINAL UNTIL APPROVED BY THE ACHD COMMISSION FACTS & FINDINGS- 1. Greenhaven Estates is a 14.8-acre, 40-lot single family resi- dential subdivision located on the west side of Meridian ap- proximately 900-feet south of Ustick. There are 1,940-feet of new public streets planned. This application includes Meridian annexation and zoning from RT to R-4. 2. GENERAL INFORMATION: LEAD AGENCY - Meridian ACRES - 14.8 FEET OF NEW PUBLIC STREETS - 1,940 LOTS - 40 PRESENT ZONING - RT PROPOSED ZONING - R-4 ESTIMATED VEHICLE TRIPS PER DAY - 400 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE - 263 L.F. OF FRONTAGE ON Meridian Road - 377-feet MOST RECENT TRAFFIC COUNTS - N/A FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP DESIGNATION - Minor Arterial ADA COUNTY RIDGE-TO-RIVERS PATHWAY PLAN - Lane EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY - 60-feet REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY - 90-feet; 45-feet from centerline Meridian Road is fully improved with 44-feet of paving and 5-foot sidewalks. add county highway dis~ric~ 318 East 37th i3oise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 PRELIMINARY P~ - GREENHAVEN ESTATES SU~VISION September 29, 1994 Page 2 IMPACT FEE BENEFIT ZONE - West Ada IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - Western Cities 3. The parcel currently contains two single family dwellings located on the east end. 4. This application is proposing a stub street to connect with Lansbury Lane subdivision to the south l29-foot back-to-back street section in 40-feet of right-of-way} and a stub street for future interneighborhood connection to the north (37-foot back-to-back street section in 50-feet of right-of-way). Staff recommends the stub street to the north be realigned to the west. 5. The preliminary plat indicates the drainage area in the north- west corner of the parcel is to be owned by ACRD. Staff recom- mends the drainage area be platted as a separate lot, owned and maintained by the homeowners association. 6. This application is scheduled for public hearing by the Meridi- an Planning & Zoning Commission on October 11, 1994. SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: 1. Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Meridi- an Road abutting parcel (15 additional feet). The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone. 2. Dedicate a 15' x 15' triangle (or appropriate curve) of right- of-way at the north and south corners of Meridian Road and the proposed Hardt Street abutting parcel to keep the street im- provements in the public right-of-way. 3. Direct lot or parcel access to Meridian Road is prohibited, in compliance with District policy. Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. 4. Replace unused curb cuts on Meridian Road with standard curb, gutter and sidewalk. 5. Utility street cuts in the new pavement on Meridian Road will not be allowed unless approved by the District Commission. 6. Realign the proposed stub street to the north, to the west. 7. The drainage area in the northwest corner of the parcel shall be platted as a separate lot, owned and maintained by the homeowners association. ' •• PRELIMINARY PLAT - ~ENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIVIS~ September 29, 1994 Page 3 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS• 1. Street and drainage improvements required in the public right- of-way shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and policies. 2. Dedicated streets and drainage systems shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and poli- cies. 3. Specifications, land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACHD shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54-1215. 4. Provide written approval from the appropriate irriga- tion/drainage district authorizing storm runoff into their system. 5. Locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drain- age appurtenances, etc.) outside of the proposed street im- provements. Authorization for relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. 6. Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across par- cel. 7. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District for review and appropriate action. 8. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and appropriate action by ACHD. The proposed drainage system shall conform to the requirements of Meridian and shall retain all storm water on-site. Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the public right-of-way or in a common lot owned by a homeowners association set aside specifically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, or other valuable ameni- ties placed in said lot. Drainage lots and their use restric- tions shall be noted on the plat. 9. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for review and appropriate action by ACHD. 10. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot property lines when the driveways are not being shared with the adjacent property. PRELIMINARY ~ - GREENHAVEN ESTATES S~IVISION September 29, 994 Page 4 11. Developer shall provide the District with a copy of the record- ed plat prior to the installation of street name signs. Street signs will not be ordered until all fees have been paid and a copy of the recorded plat has been provided to ACRD staff. The copy of the recorded plat shall show the recording information as inscribed by the Deputy County Recorder. 12. Install a stop sign on every unsignalized approach of a project street to an intersection involving a collector or arterial as the cross-street. The stop sign .shall be in- stalled when the project street is first accessible to the motoring public. 13. Aright-of-way permit must be obtained from ACRD for all street and utility construction within the public right-of- way. Contact Construction Services at 345-7667 (with zoning file number) for details. 14. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any require- ment or policy outlined herein shall be made, in writing, to the Manager of Engineering Services within 15 calendar days of the original Commission action. The request shall include a statement explaining why such a requirement would result in substantial hardship or inequity. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. STAFF SUBMITTING: DATE OF COMMISSION APPROVAL: Larry Sale a ~~'~ cn' ..p `~` ~ ~di~ii \3m~o. o~~ocn xa~'-~7 o~a3Z~o~z ~+ ~ E I I i N l i I ' ~ , I u 4 I o I ~ I 1, .~v ~~~~~~~~ov~~~~ZZ vvX X X p .ivs Q~ z. O O m m O D U U z~~j N ZOO ,,~~..~~ ttzaJann Z~ZZZ~ O~ ~~mmpO~~~~O~v~33 U U ~aa ~ii~n~~oc~i~i"i~~~~ooao.~iv~i~ V 000' ~D®Q®~it®pvOr ®r10 ~ ~ ~~i I Ii1 .. .~; ~ iii . I ~~ I - -I-- ----~ I i- i ~ ~-- - I - i - - I I ~ -- -L- -L---j _ ~-.. N tp O '~ a I ~ ~ ~ ~ I I '~ I~~•I I ~ I I ~ I I t~ ~~ ~ I I ._ _.e. I ~ I I ~ r -. I ~~~ ~ i - i i ~ ~ - i i _ ' I L~ i - ~ - -I ~ ~ - h - ~ I t t- .;- I ~ ~ ~0 I - -~ ~. I _ I ~ I ~ i I i I I- - ~ I I I I ~ ~ • ~ j~ 'tE~i! s =~~ `~~!! fi=t=a~3e v 0 M I ~~ ~ , !~ I~ !.~ ! ~ // ~ ~' // ~~ li °~ li ~~ 6 1 t• ~ phi ji ~ ~--: t _._ ~ ~ I~ i i I - ~~ ~- I~ i~ ~ I~ ~ r~, ~-. I I-, _: i ~ `' ~• ( ~ ~ ~~. ~~ - ~~ ~ -: I' - ~ ~ ~^ ~ I' ~ ..• ~% I I~ - =- r I~ i ~- ~ - i i; ~ = jj ~ - ~ I-1 i-; --~ -.; -- ~. .. 13 I~ ~ la -~ a .,~ _ ._ss~a~s~~~s~aar~ =rn~-~--~aea~ _ _ - = _ _-_ ~ - - - - ~ - I ~ ~ ~ ~i I ~ ~i I ;~ I ! i I~ Ip Ij 1 aroY NrlOl.uw 'N ~`.~ =P c St Y A l! :Y d~ ~b ~ e ~~- 6 r Y ~3 ~ u NI ~ i. JI '~ r s t is 'ib pu J p g t' i ~p ~ ~ < u. ^ • ~ ` t,i ~h ~ ;a r~ -p [A }}S ~~ d~ ~ '~- Q Q. s~ i-. yYy6 8Q u w. ~ 1 ~ N W ~ I 3 ~ WI Y f , ~ ~ # , ~ x: ~ ='e ~~ g t ! ~ _ s Z li i ~~~1~:,.~pi~~~~! ~ ~ I ~ ~¢ i ~ ~~~ .~ 8 -~ ~..R.\~~ ~ ~""w;; ~ ~: <_ sa ~~ ~1~~ ~~3~i ~~~ R e ~ 1jEy "~~ >~~; ~ ~,a .~~g =_ ~ ~_~ sc ~s pyw~ e d ~ s Y .~ R E P ~ I F 'a ~ ~ ,i ; ,# ( qq s ~' ~~ j~ ~~ ~ ~ ~j ~j~ {i s F js t z ~ € ~ ~ ~ a~~'~ , IIs zo i=j~;r l~~~j:j ,~~ , I .s :~, .,3 = J ~5~1 , ~~ s .~, 3,~ 3• • !s 3 J~ ~~ is ~~ t;~~~ j~ \ .e t~ t~ t ~ j ;~ >: i~~ is ii ~i~~j #~ t~~3'' i i i~ ~~ ;~~~,s ~ as,~~~ .~ ~j z; ~ ~, ~ ~~ j •~ ~ • ~w j ~ j b ~~; ;~i t, .l~~~f :~ SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET SAP 2 9 1~9~ TTY OF 1~EkIDIAi~ Proposed Development Name GREENHAVEN ESTATES City MERIDIAN Date Reviewed 9/22/94 Preliminary Stage XXXXX Final Engineer/Developer J-U-B Engrs Inc /The Development Company The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Boise City Street Name Ordinance. The followin4 existing street names shall appear on the plat as• "N. MERIDIAN ROAD" "N. WEST 3RD AVENUE" _. _ .. 0 ~ ._ _.. _ _~_ ___ The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in or for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTE , A,GE Y R . RE NT TIVES OR DESIGNEES ~ 2 Ada County Engineer John Priester ~ ~ Date Ada Planning Assoc. Terri Rayno Date 9~ 'r '~ ~ ~ Meridian Fire District Representative ti Date -/ NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed !!!! Sub Index Street Index _ /1 NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS- HAflDT Efl~f" ~ VICINITY MAP ~ . - ~6 _~ __ _ - - ' --- --- -= -- - us~+etf ~- :; ------ ; -- - T - -- -- _ ~ ~ 1 r ~.. ~~ -2 ~ S ~P 1 4 1~;,4 PROPOSED HOMAH ANNEXATION & , ,IOr. GREHHIAVEN ES TES SUBD. rl ~ - ~~10• MS ., - ER S~ R A SS -- i ~ ~, ~ 3~ ,% - _ - - _ ~ .. 1 ` = 3D0' - ~e 6 s ! 3~ z I ',s!IZ „;~,`I 5 ! - ie a 3 ,; ~. ~~~ ~d ~ ,M CLAIRE '~~ ~ I _ LAtY,SB ~ Y LA E ; i ' ; ~ •2 J 14 ~ _ i .~ , '7 ~B Iz 3 .7 li r3 9 9 ' ~ 6 S a S 'i ' ~ Rl _. _e- -; ~... ~ . ~ f32.5 '` -- -- ~--- -------- - - -~- ----~ ----- c~ ~ ~. ~ - ,. ~ 2 i2^. 9 ,~9 ,~6 !S u 13 .:=3 u y 10 9 9 7 5 S a S 2 o4d \ ' -- t ~ - - +~ - -- - -~ i ~ I ~i ! \ - ,h'. rv00D8URY R. !'~ W. W0008URY DR. za `{! I ti Ix 11 10 ~9 e 7 6 s •~2 11 10 9 ~ 7 ,6 S ,p I ~ V a, a 3 T ` 99 i ` • 32 I ~ 2 Q '3 ¢~. ;/ W Ek~uR~ 23 _1 1 ' ~ p ! RY PAR 9~ ~~- I7 le ,9 20 a 22 2a ~ WA~~E~ 2a 23 ~ Z +' 20 109 18 ,I I7 16 IS 14 I 13 1 9`F 16 , 30 2D ' 28 ~ 27 i 26' : ~ I v!A'ERBURY DR W '+NA'• ER9URY WY '~W ~ -- ~T ' ~ 6 S i~ I ~~ j 20 ! 23 ! ~ 2! ~ 2J ~ 18 I ~8 :7 16 i IS - ~ a l 7 i Y ~ J ~ I I ~ 12 U 10 9 e 7 6 c ;a 3 , ~ b v. I e i 7 6 4 I 3 2 1 i f 2 1 1 / 10 9 ~ ~? OR N .8 ~~ ~ ' ~~= 6 ~ s a ~ ' M \ ER11 2a / `z yr. CHRISFiEL~O ; ORS f to/tee gNDli ~ '~^ ~ ~5 I~ S I ~a I ,. ~ 8 ~. ~ ~ _ _ ~ , CENTRAL •• DISTRICT ~1'HEALTH DEPARTMENT Rezone # REVIEW SHEET Environmental Health Division ~~~y~ii~ I.rl~' Return to: Q ~ )J~'; ^ Boise ^ Eagle C,~` It ~ v`~ f&3iV~sli~i~`~'~ Co 'Tonal Use # Ppeliminary Final /Short Plat 6xc-~-~ r"h~w~-~l ES i'm~S S7/,~ ~/1`'J.S iv.N ^ I. We have Objections to this Proposal. ^ Garden city Meridian ^ Kuna ^ Acz ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. We can Approve this Proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: ^ 2 feet ^ 4 feet 7. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ,.central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water 8. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines [[3~central water 9. Street Runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ 10. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ I I. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 12. 13. Date:/ ~ /~ Ted By: fDHD 10/91 rcb, rev. I I/93 ill We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store •HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., Clty Clerk n S ~ '~vT CITY OF MERIDI MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE ear P.E. City Eng GARY D SM TH l ~1 \ WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. w t s t 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES a er up . JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Planner 8 Zoning Administrator KENNY W. BOWERS, Flre Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-0433 ~ FAX (208) 887-4813 J -• ~ Chairman • Planning g Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2E11 , ~ ,__ _ , _ ` _ !" GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor "" ''+ '1 TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVEI:OPIVIENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 4. 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/19/94 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning with a Preliminary Plat for Greenhaven Estates BY: The Development Company LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Meridian Road and South of Ustick - - JIM JOHNSON, P2 MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) JIM SHEARER, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P2 CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR X. NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT BOB CORRIE, C/C tDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) WALT MORROW, C/C U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) MAX YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) WATER DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) SEWER DEPARTMENT CITY FILES BUILDING DEPARTMENT OTHER: FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS:~~a M i di an 7 'gat ion POLICE DEPARTMENT District's Onweiler Lateral courses along Meridian CITY ATTORNEY Road. The right-of-way of the Onweiler Lateral CITY ENGINEER is 50 feet: 35 feet to the right and 15 feet to CITY PLANNER the left of center facie downstream. See Idaho Code 42-1? 08--RTl'HT4-OF-WAY NOT SUB JECT TO ADVERSE POSSESSION. The__developer must contact John Anrlarann nr Ri11 HPnSnn a t 4hFi-OFih3 or 345-2431 for a,ntnrnval before any encroach- ment or change of ri>;ht-of-way occurs. This District re uires that a Land Use Chan a/Site Deve op~nt application be Tile or review prior- to Tina p atting. Contact Donna Moore at 343- or - or urt er in ormation. atera sand waste ways must be protected. Municipa surface rainage must a retaine on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must review drainage plans. It is recommended that irrigation water be made available to all developments within this District. ~~~~~. Bill enson, Assistant Water Superintendent Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District ~~~ v~P ~ U i'~~~'~ • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chiet W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chlel WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney • COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA CITY OF MERIDIAN w A TW.MORROW 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES Planner 6 Zoning AOministrator MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 JIM JOHNSON Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 8874813 ~~~ ,. }'~~ Chairman -Planning 8 Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 ~ GRANT P. KiNGSFORD ~ ~ T _ ~ ~~w Mayor ;~() f p~ ~'l ~ l OF ~1'~it~$t~1i~ TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning 8t: Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: n~tober 4 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9119194 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning with a Preliminary Plat for Greenhaven Estates BY: The Development Company LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Meridian Road and South of ~lstick - JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT riTV orrnRtiFv MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT __J~DA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8- FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8i, FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8i FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: We require a permanent 10-foot wide public utilities easement along all lots adjacent to a road right-of-way dedicated to public or private use3 AS S~IoW^I Oil -T ~ E PR E c~.+~ i ^r q~+ty Prr~r. Tim Adams ~f~ ~~'4''"s Idaho Power g-t~-~~ 322-2047 • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR.. City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY 0. SMITH, P.E. Clty Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT. Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chfef WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-22t 1 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner 8 Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman • Planning & Zoning TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 4. 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/19/94 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning with a Preliminary Plat for Greenhaven Estates BY: The Develoament Company LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Meridian Road and South of stick JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P2 TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ~~.~:~~, • A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN S E P 3 0 t"s~4 CIT'~ OF l~~~i1~31AP~ ...~ ~-.~ OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: Plannin & Zonin~i~~u~bn, Mayor. and Council FROM: Shari L. tiles, Planning &~~Z-oning Administrator DATE: • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY U A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN October 7, 1994 SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat for Greenhaven Estates 1. Indicate centerline of Meridian Road ~ on plat. COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner 6 Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman -Planning & Zoning 2. Twenty-foot (20') minimum landscape strip is required along Meridian Road, outside of existing/proposed right-of--way. 3. All ditches are to be tiled and approval of Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District obtained prior to applying for building permits. 4. I recommend Applicant include landscaped islands on the roadway centerline with adjacent "eyebrows", similar to the Lounsbury Lane development, to help slow vehicular traffic on this straight-shot roadway. 5. Lot 9, Block 2, must have a minimum chord length of 40 feet. 6. Add name of North-South roadway on plat. 7. Add roadway widths find radius dimension. 8. Applicant will submit a variance request because of the proposed culdesac length. 9. Include minimum house size on plat. Adjacent property to the south has a minimum house size of 1,700 square feet. 10. Perimeter fencing to be installed as required by development agreement. 11. A development agreement is required as a condition of annexation. ~ ~.~+~lE~~l~~ C.~C! 1 1 194 October 5, 1994 Planning & Zoning Commission City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Greenhaven Estates Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, 43 ; a i~ i ~'rL.IliU~nl~ We have received the certified notice for the proposed Greenhaven Estates Subdivision and would like to commend the developer on his proposed densities. However, in order to establish continuity with our neighboring properties and the aesthetic quality that has already been established for our particular area of Meridian, we respectfully request that the following restrictions be recommended to the City Council prior to approval of this project: 1) That the entrance of Greenhaven Estates be designed and reviewed by the City prior to acceptance and that it be required to be more than the cedar fencing that you see in most subdivision entrances. The entrance to a neighborhood is what most people will see and thus sets the impression for the neighborhood and helps influence the future atmosphere of the City. A quality entrance reflects a quality neighborhood and a quality City. Thus, we suggest an entrance designed with either brick, stone, or extensive landscaping. 2) That "islands" be required in the street to slow traffic on the straight road as it was in Lansbury Lane (see Exhibit A). It has been suggested that speed bumps be used to slow traffic in Greenhaven, common sense says that speed bumps will only force Greenhaven residences to use Lansbury Lane for ingress/egress in order to avoid the bumps. We recommend speed bumps on the side road between Lansbury Lane and Greenhaven Estates and islands on their main road to slow their traffic, thus accomplishing the task of slowing cars while evening out traffic between the two neighborhoods. 3) We understand that the minimum square footage in an R-4 zone is 1,400 sq ft. We also know that in certain circumstances that the City has required a greater minimum than that set by the ordinance. Based on the following facts, we feel that this project warrants similar consideration, and thus request that a reasonable minimum of 1,600 sq. ft. of living space be required in Greenhaven. Greenhaven is situated between Lansbury Lane which is averaging 2,000 sq. ft. homes (based on 19 homes and a minimum of 1,700 sq. ft.) and the Sweet properties which have 2,650 sq. ft. and 2,200 sq. ft. homes on 5 acre lots. Gary Lee, the engineer for Greenhaven, communicated to Sherri Stiles that the economics involved in the larger lots would dictate larger homes. The developer however, told us that he was building in ' • • Greenhaven the same type homes he built in Elk Run only on larger lots and that economically it was feasible because he was both developer and builder. We do not feel that allowing 1,400 sq ft houses built between projects with homes of 2,000 to 2,650 square feet is good long term planning for the City of Meridian not to mention the economic injustices placed on our properties. It is difficult for us to imagine driving down Meridian Road and having an Elk Run sandwiched between Lansbury Lane and the Sweet properties. It is with this image in mind that we appreciate your consideration of our concerns regarding the Greenhaven application. Sincerely, Gi'i S ~ G~iur.~ti$ ' lJ1~i~L~Ux°Fn L~rV:+~w~c/ ~ ~6~~%~ ~ ~ / O N- !~'I PQ/ Dam// A ~v ~l2 Q , __~ ~---_ C_ . _ -~~.'~,~ - ate-, s tJ . ~.~.;..~.~. ~ ~ ~ p pi /1/, i'J2 ~~~ c,~ ~s Ry L.~'~S ~'dS ~~+~{ ~~~ R~ G~ ~~t un~wS C~is~tys~.~S' ~~3 t~. ~~~ ~ Ll~~iE- ~ ~ ~, Ct~ i~ ~ ~. c t~b~ ~ ~~ ~ ~tS G~iS ~~ H ~~ ~s ~ w~~ ~~- ~ l «~ d ~ .L W. ~t~t °~ fie, ~~~~ ~y ~~s S 11 G~~ ~?~ul ~~~ w, LltaQ~ i ~~ j ~ ~ /" ~' ~ ~cf /~ ~y ~s ~~ s ~ CAS ~l P,r C~~s ~~t~ d?~4 ~~+ ~UB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Ciark JANICE GASS, Treaauror BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, Flro Chiet BILL GORDON, Po11cs Chist GARY SMITH, P.E., City Enpinesr MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: L ' 117 A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (ZOS) 888-4433 FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor >ar COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERT GIESLER MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT 0. CORRIE Chalrrnat Zoning 6 Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI May 6, 1993 MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL, CANNING R ZDNING GARY D. SMITH, P. E. , LDUNSBURY LANE- .;,: ~" ..., {ANNEXATLDht ,~ ZONING, PRELIMINARY°;.;PLAT) I have reviewe for your infon applicant dur.i, 1. Lounsbur cant i g~to {Pet erso ~. The ch c minimum. r{ ~,,%~,p~ ~ a, ". ;~ _ _,< ;, hS .): ':no- ...'yb!n,NMT d<° this ~c,as't~a acrd". o~~r the :following comments ration and or ons~aderata,~n as Conditions of the ng your~iecr"sio^n makang process parcel xs ~canti~uous t`ol McCord; parcel which is s to thee 'pre,v.,ous=1"y `' annexed ~'' Waterbury Park parcel'.:. `z „~ ,~ t ,: ~. dista,~t=*e»~of~<-the t^wo~»f~l~g ~~ lots` must be 40 feet, o 3. Lots and Hloc~4s.s~eed_ to be numbered;., ~~ ;~ ,,~ 4. Show street names. ~''~"' ~ 5. A variance request is req%red for the length of culdesac shown. The maximum culdesac length, from center of intersecting street to center of culdesac, is 450 feet. b. Nothing is shown on the submittal regarding proposed sanitary sewer^, domestic water, drainage and/or irrigation ditches, fire hydrants and street lights. These items need to be addressed. Sanitary sewer access is a probleal as a route needs to be established westerly out of this property (and not down a lot line), across adjacent property not in ownership of eithet^ Lounsbury or McCord and under the South Slough. The sewer service question has been discussed with the applicant in only a very general way. This needs to be resolved. • • 7. Who will be responsible for saintenance of any storm drainage facilities? 8. The right of way width shown in the notes is 40 feet. Should this be 50 feet as shown on the drawing? 9. The applicant has proposed a landscaped parkway to help soften the straight line of the main road. I have talked with Wayne Forrey with my concern of higher than normal vehicle speeds on this roadway alignment. Wayne suggested positioning several landscaped islands on roadway centerline with adjacent "eye-brows" in the curb and gutter to help slow the vehicular t~^affic. • i r i 1 ssttssz:..»...«i ................. sesnsses u si s ~ ~ ~~ ~ tiliiiiJ ii i ' t !~P O tuts:ssassssssst~ tttatttttttsessas ~ Z~ ~ .d'~i' oo w ~ N asssssas.........1 RR ssiss~ssssastssss lissisiii;iisiiiil • ~ ~ 4iRtl+t4~~ttl~43St' ; $ ~ t~tsatutuuts~stt issssessssssssssst ; ~ ~ A ^b t~itillttQtttt.t =...=tt.tttt...=~ V ' m ,..t.t.t.s.a.a..; itusaasuaasutt ~ :.asssssteassts' ~ ks::ssssassssss:s ~ r` ~;iiiuiiiiisius' ~ eaeafitta~t~t~~tttt i~ii:iili~Jli i~~' ~ ~ !/ N i ~~ =~ r ~ ,.~ rra ~ a tom,,.. ~ mo=o ,: ~ = c ,., ,: ~ • Z ; ~ ~ . ,,:~ m „ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ r ~ `' ~ ~ 1 r ~aD ~Z ~m ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ .. . ~ .,.,: ' ~~~ ~ ' ~~ .. r+•.r...r.r ......r.-~. nw.r ` ~~ ~~ ~ i ~ f! ~ - ~~ e _ ** ' w H ~ •FIUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. Clty Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Pollce Chief WAVNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner 8 Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman -Planning 8 Zoning GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor MEMORANDUM: October 5, 1994 To; Mayor, City Council, Planning & Zoning From; Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer Re; GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIVISION (Annexation /Zoning & Preliminary Plat) I have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, for your information and consideration as conditions of the applicant during the hearing process: 1. Information contained in the legal description submitted with this application for annexation differs slightly from information on the Recorded Plat of Lansbury Lane Subdivision. Please clear up these discrepancies and re-submit new legal descriptions per Resolution 158 (Aug. 16, 1994). 2. Determine the seasonal high ground water elevation, and profile the sub-surface soil conditions. 3. The Preliminary Plat map Contour lines need to be tied to an established Benchmark. 4. Any existing irrigation ditches crossing the property to be included in this platting, shall be tiled per City Ordinance. Plans will need to be approved by the Nampa & Meridian Imgation District. 5. Please provide a master street drainage plan that includes the method of disposal & approval from the affected drainage district. 6. Submit the proposed restrictive covenants and/or deed restrictions for review. 7. Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision name and street names. 8. Coordinate the fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian's Water Works Superintendent. C:\WPWIN60\GENERAL\GRNI3.4 VN. P&Z • 9. A 250 Watt High Pressure Sodium Street Light will be required at the subdivision's entrance off N. Meridian Rd. 10. Existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this subdivision will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for non domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 11. Submit information detailing the traffic impact on existing or adjacent roadways & intersections. 12. Water service to this development is contingent on positive results from a hydraulic analysis by our computer model. 13. Please be advised that the sanitary sewer effluent from this proposed development will flow into the much contentious sewer system installed in Lansbury Lane Subdivision. 14. A variance on the cul-de-sac length will need to be granted in order to develop this parcel in the configuration as submitted. 15. Please label, on the Preliminary Plat map, all the corners that are referenced in the legal description for annexation. 16. Indicate on the Preliminary Plat map the existing and proposed Right-of -Way widths. 17. The Typical Street Sections shown on the Preliminary Plat map don't comply with Ada County Highway District standards. 18. Please revise the Preliminary Plat Notes as follows; (11.) Lot 2 Block 1.. . (13.) Lot 1 Block 1.. . C:IWPWIN60\GENERAL\GRNHAVN. P&Z • UB OF TREASURE VALLEY • OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., Clty Clerk GARIY D SM THS P.E. Clty Eng Weer CITY OF MERIDIAN BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste water supt. 33 EAST IDAHO KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-48(3 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. K[NGSFORD Mayor COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner fi Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman -Planning & Zoning TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 4, 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/19/94 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning with a Preliminary Plat for Greenhaven Estates - BY: The Development Company LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Meridian Road and South of Ustick JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C -WALT MORROW, C/C -MAX YERRINGTON, C/C -WATER DEPARTMENT -SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT -POLICE DEPARTMENT -CITY ATTORNEY -CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ~4DA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS:..- b • • ~~-u-B~ Engineers Surveyors Planners GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIVISION ROMAN ANNEXATION NARRATIVE Date: September 15, 1994 Prepared by: Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. Boise, Idaho Owners: John W. and Candy J. Homan, Husband and Wife and Donald F. and Rae Jean Homan, Husband and Wife Developer: The Development Group - Bill Hardt I. DEVELOPMENT LOCATION The Homan property is located in a portion of the NE 1/4 of Section 1, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, B.M., Ada County, Idaho. More particularly, the project lies west of North Meridian Road and north of Cherry Lane. Lansbury Lane Subdivision is located along the southerly boundary. Strasser Farm Subdivision lies to the north. To the north and west lies undeveloped pasture and farmland. II. SITE DESCRIPTION Currently, the site is comprised of approximately 14.85 acres of pasture land. The Onweiler Canal terminates just north of the northeast corner of the parcel and a small irrigation/waste ditch flows along the north end of the property. The parcel also contains two single-family homes located on the east end. At this time, the property is situated in Ada County and is zoned RT (Rural Transitional). North Meridian Road provides access to the parcel along the easterly boundary with North N.W. 3rd Avenue from existing developments to the south. It is anticipated that a street will be stubbed to the north for future land development. III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The developer plans to request a re-zone of the property to residential R-4. The project will consist of approximately 40 single-family residential lots resulting in a gross density of 2.7 lots per acre. The lot sizes will conform to the City of Meridian Zoning Ordinance for residential developments. This zoning request and annexation will comply with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. • • ~~-u Homan Annexation Narrative Engineers Surveyors Planners September 15, 1994 Page 2 IV. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS A. Sanitary Sewer System: There is an existing public sanitary sewer system on North N.W. 3rd Avenue that will extend into and service the majority of this property. There is also existing public sanitary sewer in North Meridian Road. B. Domestic Water System: It is anticipated that domestic water and fire flows will be supplied by the City of Meridian through the extension of an existing water system located in North Meridian Road. The system would also be tied in at North N.W. 3rd Avenue to the south. A new water distribution system will be constructed within the planned development, which will include the necessary fire hydrants, valves, blow-offs, and appurtenances as required by the State of Idaho Drinking Water Standards. C. Public Utilities: This subdivision will include public utilities, such as electric power from Idaho Power Company; natural gas from Intermountain Gas Company; telephone service from U.S. West Communications; and TV service from T.C.I., a Cable Network. Utility easements will be provided upon each lot to accommodate these public utilities as required. D. Public Streets: All streets will be constructed to Ada County Highway District Standards and Specifications. All streets will be constructed to Collector and Local Street Standards. Storm water drainage for these public streets will be collected and retained on-site in accordance with A.C.H.D. standards. Disposal of storm water into the natural drainage will consist of only flows equal to the pre-development storm water discharge of the property (i.e., the amount of storm water discharged into this drainage will not exceed what is currently flowing into said drainage ditch in its present condition). A landscape lot and landscape easements will be provided along North Meridian Road. These common lots will be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. A variance will be requested to allow Hardt Court to exceed the City minimum culdesac length of 450 feet. • ~J~u Engineers Surveyors Planners E. Irrigation and Drainage: • Homan Annexation Narrative September 15, 1994 Page 3 The existing Onweiler Canal and other irrigation ditches will be tiled to continue delivery of irrigation water to neighboring properties. Other smaller irrigation and drainage ditches that deliver water to this parcel only will be abandoned. A pressurized irrigation system will be constructed to provide irrigation water to each lot. A pumping station is tentatively planned to be located at the northeast corner of the development. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District will own and operate the system. F. Fire Protection As mentioned earlier, the domestic water system will be maintained and operated by the City of Meridian. Part of their service will include the delivery of adequate fire protection. The delivery system will be sized and hydrants placed throughout the development to meet the necessary fire flows as established by the Meridian Fire District. J-U-B #18857 • • ANNEXATION/ZONING REQLTFST AFFIDAVIT We, John W. and Candy J. Homan, husband and wife, and Donald F. and Rae Jean Homan, husband and wife, do hereby certify that we are record owners of a part of the land described as the "Homan Annexation" in an application for Annexation & Zoning Application being submitted to the City of Meridian for consideration. We further state that we hereby officially request annexation of said property into the Corporate City Limits of the City of Meridian, Idaho. In addition, we hereby state and certify that the subject property will be posted one week before the public hearing stating that the above-mentioned applications with the City of Meridian have been made. Dated this / lO ~~ ~ day of September, 1994. t,J. J .Homan Candy J. Homa STATE OF IDAHO ) ss. County of Ada ) o,~C, `~~ onald F. Ho i_ Rae Jean H ON THIS ~~day of S.ep~~~rf' , 19 9~ ,before me, a notary public in and for - - _ ~ ,~ said known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is (are) subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that ~4~ey executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. My Notary Commission Expires ~J eC ~'y / 9 9 ~/ My Notary Bond Expires ~~C'_ 5~ , 19~ Notary Public for Idaho Residing at ~ i0 /S ~ ,Idaho rJ-UJ Engineers Surveyors Planners Project: 18857 Date: September 14, 1994 • HOMAN ANNEXATION LAND SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY All that certain real property situated in Section 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., Ada County, State of Idaho, described as follows: A portion of the NE 1/4 of Section 1; further described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap being the East one quarter corner of Section 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M.; thence North 00°17'24" East, 1,724.96 feet along the East Section line, (formerly known as North, 103.43 rods) to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 89°19'43" West, 1,735.54 feet (formerly known as West, 105 rods) parallel to and 933.40 feet South of the North line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1; thence South 00°07'18" West, 381.18 feet, (formerly known as South, -21.76 and 10/11 rods) parallel with and 924.00 feet East of the West line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1; thence South 89°27'04" East, 1,734.40 feet (formerly known as East, 105 rods) along the North line of Lansbury Lane Subdivision, as filed in book 64, page 6499 of Plats, Ada County Records; thence North 00°17'24" East, 377.53 feet, (formerly known as North, 21.76 and 10/11 rods) along said East line of Section 1 to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; Said parcel contains 15.11 acres, more or less. SUBJECT T0: All existing road rights-of-way and easements of record or appearing on the above-described parcel of land. Prepared by: J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. ~~G GAL:15 o ,260 m 1I~`i OF 1~ C'~R Y A . y~~ Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. • • ~~-u Engineers Surveyors Planners Project: 18857 Date: September 14, 1994 GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIVISION LAND SITUATED IN ADA COUNTY All that certain real property situated in Section 1, T.3N., R.lW., B.M., Ada County, State of Idaho, described as follows: A portion of the NE 1/4 of Section 1, as recorded under Instrument No. 8965901 on April 13, 1989, in Ada County records, further described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap being the East one quarter corner of Section 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M.; thence North 00°17'24" East, 1,724.96 feet along the East Section line, (formerly known as North, 103.43 rods); thence North 89°19'43" West, 30.00 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 00°17'24" West, 377.53 feet, (formerly known as South, 21.76 and 10/11 rods) parallel to said East line of Section 1, to a point being the Northeast corner of Lansbury Lane Subdivision as filed in book 64, page 6499 of Plats, Ada County Records; thence North 89°27'04" West, 1704.40 feet along said Lansbury Lane Subdivision, to a point that is 924.00 feet East of the West line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 1; thence North 00°07'18" East, 381.18 feet, (formerly known as North, 21.76 and 10/11 rods) parallel with said west line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, to a point being 933.40 feet South of the North line of said Northeast Quarter of Section 1; thence South 89°19'43" East, 1,705.54 feet parallel to said North line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; Said parcel contains 14.85 acres, more or less. SUBJECT T0: All existing road rights-of-way and easements of record or appearing on the above-described parcel of land. Prepared by: J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. GAL:ls Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. P-93794 KC/ V~~ARRA1~'TY DEED 891553'7 FOR VALUE RECEIVED JACK A. t;Ai~ PAEPE4riE•7 and ARIA y. V~~ P.=.Ei?DC~IE`!, Husbsrd and t+!ife GRAf:TOR(s), dt+es(do) hereby ~RA:~T, BARC~AI\, SELL and CONVEY unto JO~-'V W, yOK~~ ~~ C:3\'DY J . HOKA_\ . Husbana ~ nd A'if P GRANTEE(S), whose current address is: 3836 .north :•S.~ridian Road, ~: a~an, ID A3~.i: rite following Cescribed real property in Coun •, S[.te of idaho, more particularly described as follows, to wit: "~ OOM''~'~CI>:G AT ~, POL\T 103. ~3 RODS FORTH OF T:~ SOC:?~'3ST CGR\'E4 OF THE SOL'I'EIEAST' QL'.ARTFR OF THE ~'ORTF0=1S'T Q(;~1.RTEI2 Oc SECTION 1, '^GI~ISHIP 3 ORTH, RAtiGE 1 t+FS'T, OF THE BOI::E-"L~tIDZF+.\, I\ 3Qa QL's:Y, STATe OF ID.aHO, ~\~ RL11L~G :E~CE c+'EST' 105 RODS Tl•L-`CE SOLTH 31.76 .~\'D 10/11 ROCS; :==:CE EAST 105 RODS T'0 T'rIE E.aST LIFE OF SAID yORT'FiEaS'I' QL'.~R'.'~ OF SDCTION O\E; ~HE\CE '.CORTH AIAtiG SAID SECTICFV LI:~~ 31.7~i a\T) 10;11 RODS :`D T?-t~ ?La,CE OF Bc'GI\1I\~. EX('E_D'T T3.aT FORTiO\ LYING AZTHIV T1-:I: RIG:-iT OF t~'aY :'OR CrL1TY irO.iD OJT^10\Z] REFc'~iRED ;U ?S `ix.~t' IDL11 RO:all Ol%r•._tt' :~\~ a.=-:JSS THE ELY POFTIQti OF Sa,ID PR.MSES. TO HAVE ADD TO HOLD toe said premises, with their appurtenances unto the said Gra^tee(s,. and Grantec~sl !:eirs and assigns forever. And the said Grantor(s) doestdol hereby covenant +o and with the saiC Grantee(s), t5at Grantor(s1 a ate the o•xnerts) in fx simple of sail pranises: that said premises are free from aL' encumbrances. EaCEPT ~h~se to which this convepaece is expressly made subject and those made, suffered or done b)• the Grsnte:(st: and subject to resen•ations. restric- tions. dedications. easements. right of way and a¢reements, (if any) of rarrd, and central rases and assessnenLS. (ircludcs irrigation rnd utilin• ssessments. if any) (or the current ::ear, w'nich :,:e no[ yet due and pad ib!e. and Thal Grantor(s) w!p Mat' rout and defend the same from all lawful claims whatsoever. Dated: ~gfpl~i~t~,,1l0~ ! 9 89 Jack =,. ~'an Pae/rx=,`~s:t i -, .ACi.b:O'1.'LEDGE~tEXT - lndividtral STATE OF IDAHO . Coutrn~ of Ada , ss. On tits 10th day of Aaril' , in the Vicar of_1989 .before s:te Diane Kelloatt , a notan public. petsona9y appeared JACK 4. ~'anDae~e¢he~ and Arlo M. PanPaece¢hea known er idcnt::;ed to me t. be the person 5_ chose name ~_3It_ subs; ihed to the within instrumem. std a:-no~iedced to me :hat t he fit. executed same. .. ~ ~~~~- \otan Public: y., ~ ,~, R:rid:ag,at~ K;tt•.•I. ID `T EXPIR.•+T]O\ ~AIE: ~ - : 2 / ~ ~ 19 f, t ~ STATc 7F IDAHO. COi`.Tl' OF~IC~ 1 :se-:b. ce: Sr::tut this instrument N'as filed for record at the ,., __ .0. .^ az ~ ...~ minutes pia ' -~ b':IocA 1, m.. this.. I ~.f.l i dad of 1. i l~ i. 19` t. to -~ of5r.. anC du:~ re•orded in B.~ot: of Dr:~s a: pa~- -- E[-0'Iiaa Raorder `~ r. r '~ Depun'. Fr_s 5 ~~. tat: to _ i- ~; , •. • • ~ E_I w est Su,e Sttmt Bo~.e. 13aho SS's: t_Q: i :361'M ,• [ides ~orh Cole Road i Rose. Nano b3'ttis . i:~St 3"•. 00 • WAR:tAtiTY DEED 596901 FOR VALI'E REC°_1~'ED JOHN W. and CAXDY J. iiOY.A.~ (husband a^•d 4ife) r,RAX'OR(s), c'xstdc) hereby GFA::T, BARGAIX. SELL ar.d CO~~'cl' ::-:o OO~AL7 F. and ~.:' RAE JEA*' HO`La.\ (husband and rife) r; ~ ~) t' GR•~~TEEt~), whose current address is: 7925 y. `teriiian Rd. , r'E~'=l e~t.ID $3C;~Z ~~ ~ the following described real pmxrty in Ada Ccunp, State o. i.a`.:, ' more parti:ularly dc~rribcd as follows. to wit: An undix•ided (~) peso-half interest r.otser.ci^.3 ~ at a point 163,43 rods 5orth of the southeast cocr.er of the southeast quarter ~ of the northeast quar_er of Section 1, Totrrahip 3 ~o:ti:, Range 1 Mest, of t'.^.z 3oise-Keridian, in Ada County, State .+f Idaho, a^.d rnnr.ing thence Fest 105 r-c~ t- thence South 21.?6 and 10/11'rods; thence East 105 tots to the east lire of a 1 said northeast quarter of Section one; thence ~o:th along said section line 21.76 and 10/lI rods to the place of beginning. Except that parcel of land lying in the ~E} of Section 1, Tot,-r.ship 3 Xorth, Range 1 Fest, Boise-Meridian, Ada County, Idaho described: Beginning at the east quarter corner of said Section 1; thence forth along the east side o: .Section 1 a distance of 1466.40 feet, [c the real point of beginning; thence S:est a distance of 330 feet; thence \ort•t a distance of 132 feet; thence ra_c a distance of 330 feet to a point on the east lice cf said Section 1; thence South along the east line of Sectio^. 1. a riistar.ce of 132 feet t~ the real point of beginning. Except that portion lying within the'rll;ht of ray for count;• road tea=.enly referred to as *ieridian Road over and across the easterly portion of said premises. TO HAVE A~rJ TO HOLD the said premises. with th:ir appun;aances into fr.: said Grantcetsl, and Grutteets) heirs and at.>icns forccer. And the said Grantor(s) doa(do; hveby cosena:.t to ~.^ ~•~..: :.`.: said Grniar;is)• that Grantor(s) is'are the owner(s) in fx simple of said premises: that said premiss are free i:om all encumbrances, E'+CEPT those to which this come) ante is expressly madr subject and those mac:. suffered or don- b)' tr.: Gin:::is): and subject to res::'t ations. restric- ticns. d:dications, easements, right of way and afire:m:nts, iif am) of r::.rd. and scn:ral taxes and assess^;nts, fintludes irrigation and utiliry assessmenu. if atrt for the current dear, which are not pct due and pa~a'+le. and that Grantoris) will a•a:• ran[ and defend the same from all lawful clai;ns whasoecer. Dated: Apr~il~C1~3, 189 JOHN 6'. H014A. ~. ~ ACK10V,'tEDGE~tE'cT - f~dis'idual STATE OF 7DAHQ .Count, of ALa , ss On this~~tJL_da)' of Prril , in the )•ear of 1989 ,before me the undersi~r!ed. . a noan public. personally appeared John ~'. do zn and Candv 7. Homan, ...,,•.~ • _.•_. l:n~wn or identified lo~tdto;x,ifiE.Eerson ~_ +hcse name s zre subs.-Hbed~io're vribtip insftyment, and acl:no4ledged to m; that t hre ~;'e~C~..tt1Rt! the tam%.': , NcBary public: ~t t - EXP1Rt1TIOV DpTE;, ~_ Plc) ~~? T;T' . C (~:•-_ = --` ~• o~ Ape, co~nTv 6.1 West State S:rm ~ Boa:. Idaho 5."Q- % x]091 ==~ ~ 898 tionh Cole Road / Bois:, Idaho FS'0•t ~ (:A9i 3"'•:'00 ~~, •.. • .r I CA.i~T J . HO`L~`l .. STATE OF ID.iHO. COL•XTl' OF ~~~ ~~ 1 hers. si. ti.at this instrum=nt w ss :u:d for record at :.'t: request ~ ~ f'~JJ.t.~cJ at ~~f~ ....iau::s past /l oo'c~~rn.. this /.~ j ~ ~ des) _f ~~:Y~r,~i Ic I9~Gft n:~ o4:f; ~'td dul) record:3 ;n B.~~' /~/~x-0ffi:io Recoran D:puq. ~~,- ' Fees S ~taA to: / f' I - 14 . ' r OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk JANICE GASS, Treasurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief BILL GORDON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer MEMORANDUM ~UB OF TREASURE VALLEY • A Good Place to Live CITY OF .MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208)888-4433 FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERT GIESLER MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT O. CORRIE Chalrrnan Zoning 6 Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial Coordinator PATSY FEDRIZZI May ta, 1993 T0: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL, CANNING R ZONING FROM:, GARY D. SMITH, P. E. , RE: LDUNSHURY LANE_ t ANNE x AT I 0N, Z DN LNG, PREt I MI NA RY' PLAT ) I have reviewe¢l this subal3ttal and offt~r the following comments for your infor,~~ation and QT^ cons'ideratr.on as conditions of the applicant dttri^t~g yo~,lr decisiat't fnaking Pt~ocess: 1. Lot.msbury parcel xs contiguous to McCord'parcel which is contiguous to the pr^evicsusly .annexed '` Waterbury Park tPetersohw.> parcel. ;;: ;~. The chor yd distance- of ~-flee ~~4-flag 1 at,~> must be 40 feet, minimum. 3. Lots and H1 ock s need t o be nttmbered. 4. Show street names. 5. A variance request is required for^ the length of culdesac shown. The maximum ctitldesac length, ft^om center of intersecting street to center of ctitldesac, is 450 feet. b. Nothing is shown on the submittal regarding proposed sanitary sewer°, domestic water, drainage and/or irrigation ditches, fire hydr^ants and str^eet lights. These items need to be addressed. Sanitar^y sewer access is a problem as a route needs to be established westerly out of this pr°operty land not down a lot line), across adjacent pr^oper^ty not in ownership of either LounsbLtr^y or^ McCord and under^ the South Slough. The sewer^ set^vice question has been discussed with the applicant in only a very gener^al way. This needs to be resolved. i • 7. Who will be responsible for saintenance of any storm drainage facilities? 8. The right of way width shown in .the notes is 4~ feet. Should this be 5Q- feet as shown on the drawing? 9. The applicant has proposed a landscaped parkway to help soften the straight line of the main road. I have talked with Wayne Forrey with my conc et^n of higher than normal vehicle speeds on this roadway alignment. Wayne suggested positioning several landscaped i slands on roadway centerline with adjacent "eye-brows" in th e curb and gutter to help slow the vehicular traffic. ~. • • ~ ::i:ii.:......i issiitii~iiif ifitli!i~ ~Q{ ~.~ 1. 1Qy ]4~~~ ~iJiiJ•:~iiiiiii~ ~~s~ ~ !S i{ ~ nsisinumnts '" .. tteYtntenseetea~ L't~t ~~~ • tt ~i :ss:ss:s.........7 ~ ~ ^ s:tn~iseie~ni4; • ~'~ aiiiiiiiiiisiiiisl ~ ~• s I ~ tifiiNtititiiNi~ I ~ itititiiiiitiiii~ I 7v I 1 i.ii:liifit=iii.: ~ iit~tlittii:tti~ij > t t.fi.iiititi.i{.i(( itteiien~:aettte! l.iiiifitifi7iS.t 1 tissttiisittistret~ I r I iiiiiatitiiaeiisij 1 a"aii~/tft`t```ttttttt ~ y~ 2ii~iii4~i7Jiiii~' 1 G I W ^:j ~ 1 a rrra a>.ai ~ a rssa ami • A 2 O i r m C 1 )° r z 1 ~~~ ~` •~ I • 1 T 1 A t l~ w .\- IO ~ C ~ w~ ~ ~ ~ r 1 G1 1 wf s 1 u ~ ~ 1 ~ =D 1 ' # Z ~ ~ m ~ IA ~ ~ ' ~ 1 ~ ~ ~L ~ I T 1 1 ~ 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 ~ ~~~! 1 ~~~~ .. M+•r .. w.r .. w•r •. ~slw~ ~ ;~ ~~ C ` ' n y s ~-~ r r • • APPLIATION FOR ANNEXATION APPROVAL & ZONING OR REZONE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FILING INFORMATION I. GENERAL INFORMATION Greenhaven Estates Subdivision (PROPOSED NAME OF SUBDIVISION) North Meridian Road, south of Ustick (GENERAL LOCATION) Part of N 1/2 NE 1/4, Section 1, T.3N., R.1 W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho (LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ATTACH IF LENGTHY) See attached John and Candy Homan +and Donald and Rae Jean ~ioman 888-2311 (OWNER(S) OF RECORD) (NAME) {TELEPHONE NO.) 2825 N. Meridian Road, Meridian, ID 83642 (ADDRESS) The Development Co. 887-5622 (APPLICANT) (NAME) (TELEPHONE N0.) 1903 S. Gull Cove Place, Meridian, ID 83642 / AnT1RFRS 1 Gary .A. Lee, P.E./L.S. J-U-B ENGINEERS Inc. {ENGINEER, SURVEYOR OR PLANNER) (NAME) (TELEPHONE N0.) 250 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201, Boise, ID 83709 (ADDRESS) a City of Meridian (JURISDICTION(S) REQUIRING APPROVAL) Residential - Sinale-family - R-4 zone requested (TYPE OF SUBDIVISION - RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL) +50 14.85 ACRES OF LAND IN CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP. {ACCEPTED BY:) (FEE) tI I ~ • • s REGJUEST FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PRELIMINARY PLAT AND/OR FINAL PLAT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSION: A -request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City Clerks possession no later than three days following the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission rill hear the request at the montt,ly meeting following the month the request was made. After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at subsequent monthly meetings provided the necessary procedures and documentation are received before 5:00 P. M., Thursday follawing the Planning and Zoning Commission action. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Annexation and Subdivision, Greenhaven Estates 2. General Location, West of Meridian Road, north of Cherry Lane 3. Owners of record, John W. and Candy J. Homan; and Donald F. and 2835 N. Meridian Road Rae Jean Homan Address, . Zip 83642 Telephone RRR_~'~1L_ 4. Applicant, The Development Group Address, 1903 S. Gull Cove Place Meridian, ID 83642 5. Engineer. Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. Firm J-U-B EN,Tty~'F'RS~ Inc Address 250 S. Beechwood, Suite 201 Zip 83709 Telephone 376-7330 6. Name and address to receive City billings: Name The Development Group Address 1903 S. Gull Cove Place Telephone 887-5622 Meridian, ID 83642 PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subdivision Features 1. Acres 14.85 2. Number of lots 4® 3. Lots per acre 2.7 4. Density per acre 2.7 (gross) 5. Zoning Classificationts) R-4 • • 6. If the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridian City Limits but within the jurisdictional mile, what is the existing zoning classlf ication RT (Ada County) _ otential teen belt No 7. Does the plat border a p 9 $. Have recreational easements been provided for No 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City ~'es Explain A 10' wide pedestrian a ^~COmP.,t will connect property to west. 10. Are there proposed dedications of common areas? Yes Explain Entryway Common Area and Landscape Easement For future parks? NO Explain Meridian do you 11. What school(s) service the area propose any agreements for future school sites No Explain XX Water Supply 12. Other proposed amenities to the City Fire Department Other XX Sewer Explain A new water distribution, extension of existing sewer lines. 13. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial ur combination) Residential 14. Type of Dwelling(s) Single Family. Duplexes. Multinle~ces. other Sin -fami 15. Proposed Development features: a. Minimum square footage of lot(s). 8.000 sq. ft. 1,400 sq. ft. min. b. Minimum square footage of structure(s) Yes square footage-- c. Are garages provides for, d. Are other coverings provided for No e. Landscaping has been provided for Yes Describe Within the common lots at entry (2) • • f. Trees will be provided for Yes Trees will be maintained Yes - By Homeowners' Association g. Sprinkler systems are provided for Yes h. Are there multiple units NO Type remarks i. Are there special set back requirements No Explain j. Has off street parking been provided for YeS .Explain Garages and driveways k. Value range of property $90,000 - $140,000 1. Type of f financing f or development FHA , VA . HUD. .onv nt; renal m. Protective covenants were submitted NO . Date w/final plat 16. Does the proposal land lack other property No Does it create Enclaves No STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be constructed to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be five (5) feet in width. ~. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 3. ~! . J. 6. Development will connect to City services. Development will comply witr, City Ordinances. Preliminary Plat will include all appropriate easements. Street names must not conflict with City grid system. t3) V ! f Y 11M ~~ ~~~~~~ ~7i~4 ~i~ t r! ! 1 ~ ~ t~~ i¢p} ~ jy :~ 3 13~ 33 ~t ~!~ ~? a ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ fig= } t}r ~ f [ r M N ~ !y >• iN~tirY ~~1~£~! s s t' !r ~(~ _ _ ~ ` ~ 5 ~~~ ~F~ ~ r ~~~ 2 D ~~ L ~ ~ ~t~ ~~ ~~~ s Y ~ _~~ ~~ s ~~aa 6 ~ t F .. ~~~s-~ ~~~ S 4~~ ~i oc •F $ Y a < + f r "sZ t Y~ m ~~~~ ~~~ .~ ~ x ~ f ~; 9 m 3ji~ Y n% m ~.i ~~~ ~a Z m ~~l ~eT~1<}; C&~9~ ~~~~ • N. MERIDIAN ROAD s ~~ ¢ ~ ~ ~ I ¢ #~~~~~~~~~~~~~f~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ f 2 i~ ~ ~~f aid ~~~ j R/ g 9 !~ ~g ~ ~~ ~C n ~' i r+ v~ ~x i I~ ,~ i ~I j 1 ~' ~R~ ~IM,~,~~ ~ '-~€ ~ ~ ~ ' ~~ -3 ~ 8 A iF C Ip ~ VAR FFi I -1 ~ f~P I ~r:~: g ~~ 1 ~ ~° - Qj ~E ~ T~ ~~ ~a ~INITY MAP .~ t~~ o-- ~~ i - _.. 'i. -2 ~ SLP 1 4 1~~4 PROPOSED NOMAN ANNEXATION & P n ,IOI'. GRENNIAVEN ES TES SUBD. ., -- a_ - ~~ ~6. _~~MS ., - R ~ R ASSE S ~ . -~ ~ ~ J a_L_t_l.t_ -a..1-.~_..L_.z_ 1 ` = 30~ - ~~~Z~ ~ • A 6 S e e 3 2 I ~ '3 I 12 li j !C I y I d I I I I^ ~ ~ 16 3 .~ I ~ ,. J ,J Q l I ~ ~. -I fT ' ~ ~ ^4A 6 ' 2 ~ 3 la ~ ~ ~,c 7~ 8 Y LA E ~ ~3 ~ I I r~ 9 9 I 6 ~ S 4 3 I i , _ __ b I • • -~ ~ r • .. _ t -- ~- - _. -~- ------ - ---- 732.5 • - ~~ \ \ '2 ,2u .'9 R ~~.' '~~6 IS i4 13 I • -- ~- .. i - ~- - ,~;3 n ~ 10 ;9 8 7 .~5 S + t - --- -- -- - - - -- 4 S -- .__ - 2 0~ . . .. .. i ~ I i I I I~ I C ~ 24 ~ W. wGODBURr ~R. '~ W. WOOD BU RY DR. Z i 2 I I 10 9 /~ 7 ,L 12 ii I~ I9 8 ~ 6 S • 4 ~r 6 5 .. a ~,p i I UB 13 32 ~ 2 ® ~3 ~~G~ ,~/ Y~ EkbURY 23 -~~__1 ~, ! W TE + E4R PAR 0. 2 I i 24 i ~ PS I v~" , - n le re L ~6 zo a 2 z 2a ?~ i 27 26 i 30 ~ i 1 i ~ I 23 i ~ i 20 19 18 . 17 16 IS 14 ~ 13 2 ry, i ~~!! ~ -- yy v/A?ERBURY DR ' ~- W 'WA? ERBURY WY - 6 ~ 5 ~ q ~ 2 ~ ~ ', 24 ~ 23 ~ 21 i 20 ~ ly iB 17 16 ~ ~~ j I J IS 1 ~ I , 12 a IO 9 8 g= 7 6 J 4 23 ~2 A O~ 9~ ~.8 7 6 4 3 2 ~ /4 i '2 ~ t I X10 ~9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~_ ~ 6 ~ 6 ~ • - ER ~- 2° ~ w. CHRISFIELD OR Fh'IDI,49v i e 4 N -, ' ~ 22 I s I s R N~8 ; ~~ i ~ \\ l a I s -.~R ~~ ~i RI ~• ~T . _ ~. S o~ y a. a~ ~~ ~~ g ~~ ~~ ~ u u~i r ~~ Nye ~~~ ~. r: ~ ~ i a, N~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ Y ~~3 ~. ~.~ Z ~~~ !~ ~3~~~~:~~~i~~~ ~~ I`li~~~1~~~ ~I ~~I~ i ~ B Y ~ ~a ~~ ~p ~r ~f Ls ~! =S 6~~ q6 •@ Os ^sa $* c a a a i i i 1 3£ ~~ ~~~'~a ~~~ ~ ' ~ ij' ~ L ~ y°°°~~~ ~ ~ ~8 3 G i Y ~ N ~ ~ ~ 9 - j ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ i ~a~~ ~_~~~ ~ ~ ~~j~ a ~; ~~ ,~ t~~ ~ ; : ~ ~~r ~# !~ f { ~g ~ # ~ 6 ~ ;'1 ~~~ ~~ €~ ~ ~ = j~~ ~~ ~~ _~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ i~~ ~~_ ~~ l ~ 4s s~ ~ ! I J tt ~~ ~~ ~~ 1#~~~ tf ~ ~~ i~$ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ G S a `~ ~~ tt ~;Zip ~, ¢~a=~ ~~s ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~{~ ~ s~~ ~~ #~ 3 ORDINANCE NO. 687 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., ADA COUNTY, STATE OF IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to annex to the said City real property which is described in Section 1 below: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the real property described as: All that certain real property situated in Section 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., Ada County, State of Idaho, described as follows: A portion of the NE 1/4 of Section 1, further described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap being the East one quarter corner of Section 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M.ri thence North 00°17'24" East, 1,724.96 feet along the East Section line, (formerly known as North, 103.43 rods) to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 89°19'43" West, 1,735.54 feet (formerly known as West, 105 rods) parallel to and 933.40 feet South of the North line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1; thence South 00°07'18" West, 381.18 feet, (formerly known as South, 21.76 and 10/11 rods) parallel with and 924.00 feet East of the West line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1; thence South 89°27'04" East, 1,734.40 feet (formerly known as East, 105 rods ) along the North lin aoe 6499 uof Lane Subdivision, as filed in book 64, p g Plats, Ada County Records; thence North 00°17'24" East, 377.53 feet, (formerly known as North, 21.76 and 10/11 rods) along said East line of Section 1 to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - GREENHAVEN ESTATES Page 1 is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and shall be zoned R-4 Residential; that the minimum house size built on the property shall be 1,600 square feet; that the annexation and zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for annexation and zoning. Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de- annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements: a. That the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer and resolve how the water and sewer mains will serve the land. b. That the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan adopted January 4, 1994. c. That, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, K, L of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian and other matters. d. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, and 11-9-605 M. which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways . e. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind the Applicant, the titled owners, and their assigns. f. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. Section 3. That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy of the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - GREENHAVEN ESTATES Pale 2 M within ten (10) days following the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this day of January, 1995. APPROVED: MAYOR -- GRANT P. KINGSFORD ATTEST: WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. -- CITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada, ) I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., ADA COUNTY, STATE OF IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE"; passed as Ordinance No. 687, by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the day of January, 1995, as the same appears in my office. DATED this day of January, 1995. City Clerk, City of Meridian Ada County, Idaho ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - GREENHAVEN ESTATES Page 3 . , STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada, ) On this day of January, 1995, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. SEAL Notary Public for Idaho Residing at Meridian, Idaho My Commission Expires ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - GREENHAVEN ESTATES Page 4 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: DECEMBER 15 1994 APPLICANT: THE DEVELOPMENT GROUP ITEM NUMBER; 2 8~ 3 REQUEST; PUBLIC HEARING• REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDMSION AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION; SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW "REVIEWED" SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS "~~ ~01 t~SC"U ~ I G~ ~5 ~ ~ G~~~ ~~~ d ~r ~~ ((~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS OTHER: ~~~1 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA WILLIAM G.BERG,JR.,CityClerk CITY OF MERIDIAN MAkYERRINGTON JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer ROBERT D. CORRIE GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. SHARI STILES JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste water supt. 33 EAST IDAHO ~,, ,.-, ,,.-~;~ ~ :J- ~ ~~ gla-rner 8 Zoning Administrator KENNY W.80WERS,FireChief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 >hs..':.1~-~ ~ tr,.-' W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-0433 • FAX (208) 887813 Chairman ~ Planning & Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 ~ ~ ~ {~ ~ '~t''~ GRANT P. KINGSFORD ~,.t„ , , ; , . ,; : ~- ,-y M , - a. ,; Mayor ~,, j : r, ,~ i_ 1r:1.C:inl6t~i'i MEMORANDUM: - October 5, 1994 To; Mayor, City Council, Planning & Zoning From; Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer Re; GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIVISION (Annexation /Zoning & Preliminary Plat) I have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, for your information and consideration as conditions of the applicant during the hearing process: 1. Information contained in the legal description submitted with this application for annexation differs slightly from information on the Recorded Plat of Lansbury Lane Subdivision. Please clear up these discrepancies and re-submit new legal descriptions per Resolution 158 (Aug. 16, 1994). 2. Determine the seasonal high ground water elevation, and profile the sub-surface soil conditions. 3. The Preliminary Plat map Contour lines need to be tied to an established Benchmark. 4. Any existing irrigation ditches crossing the property to be included in this platting, shall be tiled per City Ordinance. Plans will need to be approved by the Nampa & Meridian Imgation District. 5. Please provide a master street drainage plan that includes the method of disposal & approval from the affected drainage district. 6. Submit the proposed restrictive covenants and/or deed restrictions for review. 7. Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision name and street names. 8. Coordinate the fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian's Water Works Superintendent. C: \W PWIN60\GENERAL\GRNHAVN. P&Z 9. A 250 Watt High Pressure Sodium Street Light will be required at the subdivision's entrance off N. Meridian Rd. 10. Existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this subdivision will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for non domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 11. Submit information detailing the traffic impact on existing or adjacent roadways & intersections. 12. Water service to this development is contingent on positive results from a hydraulic analysis by our computer model. 13. Please be advised that the sanitary sewer effluent from this proposed development will flow into the much contentious sewer system installed in Lansbury Lane Subdivision. 14. A variance on the cul-de-sac length will need to be granted in order to develop this parcel in the configuration as submitted. 15. Please label, on the Preliminary Plat map, all the corners that are referenced in the legal description for annexation. 16. Indicate on the Preliminary Plat map the existing and proposed Right-of -Way widths. 17. The Typical Street Sections shown on the Preliminary Plat map don't comply with Ada County Highway District standards. 18. Please revise the Preliminary Plat Notes as follows; (11.) Lot 2 Block 1.. . (13.) Lot 1 Block 1.. . C: \WPWIN60\GENFRAL\GRNHA V N. P&Z HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., Clty Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: Plannin & Zoning Com i1;on Mayor and Council FROM: Shan 1.. Stiles, Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: October 7, 1994 SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat for Greenhaven Estates 1. Indicate centerline of Meridian Road on plat. COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. COP.RIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner & Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman -Planning 8 Zoning 2. Twenty-foot (20') minimum landscape strip is required along Meridian Road, outside of existing/proposed right-of--way. 3. All ditches are to be tiled and approval of Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District obtained prior to applying for building permits. 4. I recommend Applicant include landscaped islands on the roadway centerline with adjacent "eyebrows", similar to the Lounsbury Lane development, to help slow vehicular traffic on this straight-shot roadway. 5. Lot 9, Block 2, must have a minimum chord length of 40 feet. 6. Add name of North-South roadway on plat. 7. Add roadway widths end radius dimension. 8. Applicant will submit a variance request because of the proposed culdesac length. 9. Include minimum house size on plat. Adjacent property to the south has a minimum house size of 1,700 square feet. 10. Perimeter fencing to be installed as required by development agreement. 11. A development agreement is required as a condition of annexation. BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COI~II~IISSION HOMAN AND THE DEVELOPMENT GROUP GREENHAVEN ESTATES ANNEXATION AND ZONING PORTION OF THE N 1/2 NE 1/4 3E, SECTION 1, T.3N., R.lE MERIDIAN. IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for consideration on October 11, 1994, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the Council having heard and taken oral and written testimony and the Applicant not appearing but through Gary Lee, Professional Engineer, and having duly considered the matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of public hearing on the annexation and zoning was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for October 11, 1994, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the October 11, 1994, hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations; 2. That the property included in the application for annexation and zoning is described in the application, and by this GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 1 reference is incorporated herein; that the property is approximately 14.88 acres in size; it is on the west side of Meridian Road between Cherry Lane Road and Ustick Road; that it is adjacent to Lansbury Subdivision; Strasser Farm Subdivision lies to the north. 3. That the property is presently zoned by the county RT (Rural Transition) and the proposed use would be for R-4 Residential type development. 4. The general area surrounding the property is used agriculturally and residentially. 5. That the property is adjacent and abutting to the present City limits. 6. The Applicant is not the owner of record of the property, but he has submitted the consent of the titled owners, John W. and Candy J. Homan and Donald F. and Rae Jean Homan. 7. That the property included in the annexation and zoning application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 8. That the parcel of ground is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 9. That the Application requests that the parcel be annexed and zoned R-4 Residential; that the present use of the property is for two residences and for limited agriculture; that the applicant indicated that the intended development of the property is for R-4 Residential development with houses containing a minimum of 1,400 square feet; that the Applicant has submitted a preliminary plat. GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 2 10. That Gary Lee stated at the hearing that the density would be 2.7 dwellings units per acre, that there would be a 20 foot landscaped buffer along Meridian Road, that the lots would be approximately 13,000 square feet, that the R-4 requirements would be met, the streets would meet ACHD requirements, that they would request a variance on the cul-de-sac length, that the Onweiler ditch would be used for pressurized irrigation, that the road medium would be landscaped, that the homes would be from 1,400 to 1,800 square feet, and that the City Engineer's comments would be met. 11. It is also stated in the Application that Onweiler canal and other irrigation ditches would be tiled to continue delivery of irrigation water and that other smaller irrigation and drainage ditches that deliver water to this property only would be abandoned; that pressurized irrigation would be constructed to each lot and a pumping station tentatively planned to be located at the northeast corner of the development, which irrigation system would be operated by Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District; that access to the sewer line for purposes of maintenance, is still being worked out with the owner of the property, Mr. Bob Flaten and the developer of Lansbury Lane Subdivision, Mr. Cris Williams. 12. There were property owners in the immediate area that testified objecting to the annexation and zoning of the parcel: a. Rich and Gloria Fern testified that their concerns have to do with the traffic constantly being in front of their property once the development is finished with the flow coming in and out of the complex; that the Ada County Highway District and Shari Stiles have commented there GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 3 are an estimated 400 vehicle trips per day that will take place; that vehicle lights will be hitting directly onto their duplex and as the vehicles turn the lights will be crossing their entire residence; that street lighting won't be offensive if proposed; that a concern over their tenants backing out of their residences onto Greenhaven Estates Street; that adequate dumpsters be made available at the construction site to care for blowing debris and that the developer put sound walls and landscape barriers to curtail some of the noise and lessen the visual impact of headlights to preserve privacy. b. Dan Sweet testified regarding the size of the house the developer plans for this development; that the property north of this proposed development has houses in the 2600 square foot range; that when the zoning starts to go down to R-4 the size and price of the homes in the area diminish; that the Commission stick with not real expensive developments and little so so developments; that he too, is concerned about the increase of traffic. c. That John Sanford testified that his 7 1/2 acres east of Vendable Lane, which is a private, deeded lane, is landlocked; that he needs access; that he was told Vendable Lane would be made a through street when the Waterbury Park No. 5 was being developed; that the engineers for Waterbury Park No. 5 development, Brian Smith, Hubble Engineering, told him they were going to make a stipulation to cross the slough onto Mr. Sanford's property so he would have access into Waterbury No. 5; that now Mr. Smith says this is not true, that they did away with that; that kids are already coming from Lansbury Subdivision chasing his horses which are across the ditch; that Vendable Lane needs to be a public street; that the Ada County Highway District said they figured he would never want access for reasons of development because of the large arena he has for cutting horses; that Mr. Sanford never received notice of Waterbury 5 Subdivision being finally approved and that they are not going to go across the canal like Mr. Sanford was earlier told. d. That Joe Simunich testified as to the irrigation and the Onweiler Lateral; that on the plat for Lansbury Subdivision the covenants say no irrigation water will be provided to the lots; that now this developer is scheduling pressurized irrigation; that those established in the area are not likely to give up their water rights; that for years there has been a rotation on that lateral; that the question arises as to how the developer plans to water all these proposed lots on a 12 hour rotation when GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 4 water only comes 12 hours out of every 8 days; that when these subdivisions come up, we in the area get a product or ditch or something that is unsatisfactory like fences built right on top of the irrigation line causing people not to have access to their head gates. e. Chris Williams testified that he liked the density; that he desire restriction of an entrance which included a brick wall, islands in the roadway, that the frontage setbacks be alternated, that the homes should be a minimum of 1,600 square feet. 13. That the property is in an area marked on the Generalized Land Use Map of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as a single family residential area; that in the Comprehensive Plan property inside the Urban Service Planning Area may be developed at greater densities than one dwelling unit per acre. 14. That in the Rural Area section of the Comprehensive Plan, Land Use, Rural Areas, Section 6.3, it does state that land in agricultural activity should so remain in agricultural activity until urban services can be provided. 15. That Meridian has, and is, experiencing a population increase; that there are pressures on land previously used for agricultural uses to be developed into residential subdivision lots. 16. That the property can be physically serviced with City water and sewer if the Applicant extends the lines. 17. Meridian Police Department, Meridian Fire Department, Meridian City Engineer, Meridian School District, the Central District Health Department, Ada County Highway District, Ada County Street Name Committee, Idaho Power, U. S. West and Nampa Meridian Irrigation District did submit comments and such are incorporated GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 5 herein as if set forth in full. That the Meridian Planning Director did submit comments among which were that a 20 foot minimum landscape strip is required along Meridian Road outside of the proposed right-of-way, all ditches are to be tiled and approval obtained of Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District obtained prior to applying for building permits, that landscaped islands should be placed on the roadway centerline, that a variance was needed for the length of the cul-de-sac, that the property to the south has a minimum house size of 1,700 square feet, that perimeter fencing is to be installed, and a development agreement is required as a condition of annexation; that the City Engineer commented that the legal description needs to be resubmitted pursuant to Resolution 158, that the seasonal high ground water elevation needs to be determined and a profile of the sub-surface soil conditions was needed, that the irrigation ditches crossing the parcel need to be tiled, that a master street drainage plan needed to be submitted, and that the fire hydrant placement needed to be coordinated with the Water Works Department. 18. It is particularly noted that the Ada County Highway District , in its site specific requirements, stated that the stub street shown running to the north should run to the west. 19. That the R-4, Residential District is described in the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 3 as follows: 1R-41 Low Density Residential District: Only Single Family Dwellings shall be permitted and no conditional uses shall be permitted except for Planned Residential Development and public schools. The purpose of the (R-4) District is to permit the establishment of low density single-family GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 6 dwellings, and to delineate those areas where predominately residential development has, or is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, and to protect the integrity of residential areas by prohibiting the intrusion of incompatible non-residential uses. The (R-4) District allows for a maximum of four ( 4 ) dwelling units per acre and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian. that the R-4 zoning district requires a minimum of 1,400 square feet to be included in houses in that zone; that the Applicant's representative stated that the subdivision applied for would comply with the R-4 requirements. Z0. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Residential Policies, 2.1U states as follows: "Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi-family, town houses, apartments, condominiums, etc. ) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities." 21. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Rural Areas, 6.3 c., it states as follows: "Within the Urban Service Planning Area development may occur in densities as low as 3 dwellings per acre if physical connection is made to existing City of Meridian water and sewer service and the property is platted and subdivided . .' 22. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Rural Areas, 6.4, it states as follows: "Residential development is allowed in the rural area provided that said development does not exceed the Rural Residential Agricultural density, unless it is inside the Urban Service Planning Area and City sewer and water is provided, then Low, Medium and High density residential may be considered. All residential development must also comply with the other appropriate sections of this plan." 23. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Housing, Housing Policies, at page 66, it states as follows: GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 7 "1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile homes, multi-family, town houses arrangements), ." "1.3 An open housing market for all persons, regardless of race, sex, age, religion or ethnic background." "1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping centers should be encouraged." 24. That there is a population influx into the City of Meridian at the present time which has been going on for some time and is likely to continue; that the land is relatively close to Meridian and economic conditions are making it difficult to continue farming in the area. 25. That in 1992 the Idaho State Legislature passed amendments to the Local Planning Act, which in 67-6513 Idaho Code, relating to subdivision ordinances, states as follows: "Each such ordinance may provide for mitigation of the effects of subdivision development on the ability of political subdivisions of the state, including school districts, to deliver services without compromising quality of service delivery to current residents or imposing substantial additional costs upon current residents to accommodate the subdivision."; that the City of Meridian is concerned with the increase in population that is occurring and with its impact on the City being able to provide fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services to its current residents and to those moving into the City; the City is also concerned that the increase in population is burdening the schools of the Meridian School District which provide school service to current and future residents of the City; that the City knows that the increase in GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 8 population does not sufficiently increase the tax base to offset the cost of providing fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services; and the City knows that the increase in population does not provide sufficient tax base to provide for school services to current and future students. 26. That pursuant to the instruction, guidance, and direction of the Idaho State Legislature, the City may impose either a development fee or a transfer fee on residential property, which, if possible, would be retroactive and apply to all residential lots in the City because of the imperilment to the health, welfare, and safety of the citizens of the City of Meridian. 27. That Section 11-9-505 C states as follows: "Right-of-way for pedestrian walkways in the middle of long blocks may be required where necessary to obtain convenient pedestrian circulation to schools, parks or shopping areas; the pedestrian easement shall be at least ten feet (10') wide." 28. That Section 11-9-605 G 1. states as follows: "Planting strips shall be required to be placed next to incompatible features such as highways, railroads, commercial or industrial uses to screen the view from residential properties. Such screening shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') wide, and shall not be a part of the normal street right of way or utility easement." 29. That Section 11-9-605 H 2. states as follows: "Existing natural features which add value to residential development and enhance the attractiveness of the community (such as trees, watercourses, historic spots and similar irreplaceable amenities) shall be preserved in the design of the subdivision;" 30. That Section 11-9-605 R states as follows: "The extent and location of lands designed for linear open space corridors should be determined by natural features and, GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 9 to lesser extent, by man-made features such as utility easements, transportation rights of way or water rights of way. Landscaping, screening or lineal open space corridors may be required for the protection of residential properties from adjacent arterial streets, waterways, railroad rights of way or other features. As improved areas (landscaped), semi- improved areas (a landscaped pathway only), or unimproved areas (left in a natural state), linear open space corridors serve: 1. To preserve openness; 2. To interconnect park and open space systems within rights of way for trails, walkways, bicycle ways; 3. To play a major role in conserving area scenic and natural value, especially waterways, drainages and natural habitat; 4. To buffer more intensive adjacent urban land uses; 5. To enhance local identification within the area due to the internal linkages; and 6. To link residential neighborhoods, park areas and recreation facilities." 31. That Section 11-9-605 L states as follows: Bicycle and pedestrian pathways shall be encouraged within new developments as part of the public right of way or as separate easements so that an alternate transportation system (which is distinct and separate from the automobile) can be provided throughout the City Urban Service Planning Area. The Commission and Council shall consider the Bicycle-Pedestrian Design Manual for Ada County (as prepared by Ada County Highway District) when reviewing bicycle and pedestrian pathway provisions within developments. 32. That proper notice was given as required by law and all procedures before the Commission were given and followed. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met; including the mailing of notice to owners of property GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 10 within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. 2. That the City of Meridian has authority to annex land pursuant to 50-222, Idaho Code, and Section 11-2-417 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that exercise of the City's annexation authority is a Legislative function. 3. That the CITY COUNCIL has judged this annexation and zoning application under Section 50-222, Idaho Code, Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Meridian City Ordinances, the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the record submitted to it and things of which it can take judicial notice. 4. That all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been complied with. 5. That the Commission may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and State. 6. That the land within the proposed annexation is contiguous to the present City limits of the City of Meridian, and the annexation would not be a shoestring annexation. 7. That the annexation application has been initiated by the Applicant, The Development Group, and the annexation is not upon the initiation of the City of Meridian, but is at the request of the Applicant. 8. That since the annexation and zoning of land is a legislative function, the City has authority to place conditions GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 11 upon the annexation of land. Burt vs. The City of Idaho Falls. 105 Idaho 65, 665 P.D 1075 (1983). 9. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616 which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, 11-9-605 M, Piping of Ditches, and Section 11-9-606 B 14., which pertains to pressurized irrigation; that the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer; that the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance; that, as a condition of annexation the Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address the inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, R, L and prior comments of the previous Planning Director, Wayne Forrey, relating to the lack of adequate recreation facilities and that land set aside for a future park would be desirable, that the City is in need of land set-asides for future public service use; that the development agreement shall, as a condition of annexation, require that the Applicant, or if required, any assigns, heirs, executors or personal representatives, pay, when required, any development fee or transfer fee adopted by the City; that there shall be no annexation until the requirements of this paragraph are met or, if necessary, the property shall be subject to de- annexation and loss of City services, if the requirements of this paragraph are not met. GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 12 10. That proper and adequate access to the property is available and will have to be maintained; that it is concluded that as a condition of annexation, access to the property now owned by John Sanford shall be provided; that the access shall be sufficient to meet Ada County Highway District street requirements. 11. That since the Applicant's property is in an area marked as a single family residential area, the annexation and zoning Application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and does not conflict with the Rural Areas policies; but the land does border rural farms or ranches and those farms and ranches shall be buffered and the subdivision covenants shall let the home owners in the proposed subdivision know that the farms and ranches are there and that agricultural uses will, or may, be continued; that this matter shall be addressed in the development agreement. 12. Therefore, based on the Application, the testimony and evidence, the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian it is ultimately concluded that Applicant's property should be annexed and zoned R-4; that the conditions should be those stated above; that such annexation would be orderly development and reasonable if the conditions are met; that the property shall be subject to de-annexation if the requirements of these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are not met. 13. That all ditches, canals, and waterways required to be tiled by City Ordinance shall be tiled as a condition of annexation and if not so tiled the property shall be subject to de-annexation. 14. With compliance of the conditions contained herein, the GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 13 w annexation and zoning of R-4, Residential would be in the best interest of the City of Meridian. 15. Since the property to the north and to the south, as shown from the testimony of Dan Swwet and Chris Williams, have homes of at least 1,600 square feet, it is concluded that the minimum size house that could be built in this subdivision should be 1,600 square feet. (Added to Conclusions pursuant to motion made and passed by the Commission on November 9, 1994.) 16. That if the conditions of approval are not met the property shall be subject to de-annexation. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONER HEPPER COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE COMMISSIONER SHEARER COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) RECONII~IENDAT I ON VOTED f GL CU~~ VOTED ' VOTED VOTED VOTED The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the Meridian City Council that the property be annexed and zoned R-4 Residential with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, including that the minimum size houses that could be built in this subdivision should be 1,600 square feet, and that the Applicant and owners be specifically required to GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 14 the all ditches, canals and waterways, and install a pressurized irrigation system, as conditions of annexation, and that the Applicant meet all of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian, specifically including the development time requirements and enter into the required development agreement, and that if the conditions are not met that the property be de-annexed. MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 15 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., Clty Clerk i S CITY OF MERIDIAN MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE neer GARY D. SM TH P.EyClty Eng WALT W. MORROLV BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste water st,pt. 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES KENNY W. BOWERS, Flre chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Planner 8 Zoning Atlm~nistrater W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887813 Chairman • Planning 8 ZoninG Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 4. 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/19/94 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning with a Preliminarx Plat for Greenhaven Estates BY: The Develoument Company LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Meridian Road and South of Ustick JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P2 JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P2 TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF REC ION(PRELIM 8/F,l~d>PL ~ T) CITY FILESYY /1TLIBC. /J . . . /J i Is / / YOUR CONCISE OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. Clty Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES Sr'° t'; T. r *plennRr 8 Zoning Administra:o: MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 ~'F" i ~` ~" ;, ~-+ : ~ ~..~ JIM JOHNSON Phone 208 888-4433 • FAX 208 887813 ~ ~ ( ) ( ) Chairman • Planning 8 Zone^y Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~~~:'i GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor ~ x ~ '~' ~ ; „ z.; `. S~ a''i ~~' li/~if rl ij TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 4, 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/19/94 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST:~i vexation/zoning with a Preliminary Plat for Greenhaven Estates BY: The Development Company LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Meridian Road and South of Ustick JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P2 TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES ~_ ~ D _ ~ , ` OTHER: `~ YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: 0?it.~'~"-- HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good PIaCe LO L1VC COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA CITY OF MERIDIAN OBERTD!CORRIE WALT W. MORROW R EXC ft! ~Z / C7 2/ Q ~~ ~~ SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS ~~-: A ~, Bob L. Haley ~~°~ '~ ~'~y DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT Dan Mabe, Finance & Administration (+'~ _ /, ~~{,~jt ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT '3 Christine Donnell, Personnel & Instruction ~ QF l~E~ID~~ DIRECTORS Sheryl Belknap, Elementary Jim Carberry, Secondary Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911MERIDIANSTREET MERIDIAN,IDAH083642 PHONE(208)888-6701 October 3, 1994 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Preliminary Plat for Greenhaven Subdivision Dear Councilmen: I have reviewed the application for Greenhaven Subdivision and find that it includes approximately 40 homes at a median value of $120,000. We also find that this subdivision is located in census tract 103.11 and in the attendance zone for Chief Joseph Elementary, Meridian Middle School and Meridian High School. The school district may be required to transport elementary students from this subdivision to Ridgewood Elementary or another school that may have capacity, due to overcrowding at Chief Joseph Elementary. Using the above information we can predict that these homes, when completed, will house 14 elementary aged children, 10 middle school aged children, and 9 senior high aged students. At the present time Chief Joseph Elementary is at 101 of capacity, Meridian Middle School is at 139 of capacity and Meridian High School is at 130 of capacity. The Meridian School District is not opposed to growth in our district, however this subdivision will cause increased over- crowding in all three schools. There is little opportunity to shift attendance boundaries since the surrounding schools are also well over capacity. Before we could support this subdivision, we would need land available at a minimum price for a school site in this area. The site would need water and sewer services available. In addition we would need to pass another bond issue for the construction of schools. The cost per student for newly constructed schools, excluding site purchase price and offsite improvements, exceeds $5,000 per elementary student and $10,000 per middle or high school student. We are in a difficult position and need your help in dealing with the impact of growth on schools. SincerelAy~, ~~""~ Dan Mabe Deputy Superintendent DM:gr ---~ - .~~ =~EJN .1. ~HOGES. Presiaen* -ERRY R HUBER. Vice Pres,aeni -~'~~ES E 3RUCE. Sacrero~• T0. THE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 1903 S. GULL COVE PLACE MERIDIAN ID 83642 FROM: Karen Gallagher, Coordinator Development Services Q f~ T i Z f:;• `~ CITY f>~ ~s{ ~.,,~... aY.i.l.lai.~: October S, 1994 SUBJECT: sREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIVISION - PRELIMINARY PLAT On October 5, 1994, the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District (hereafter called "District") took action on the Preliminary Plat as stated on the attached staff report. In order that the Final Plat may be considered by the District for acceptance, the Developer shall cause the following applicable standard conditions to be satisfied prior to District certification and endorsement: 1. Drainage plans shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. 2. If public street improvements are reQUired: Prior to any construction within the existing or proposed public right-of- way, the following shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District: a. Three complete sets of detailed street construction drawings prepared by an Idaho Registered Professional Engineer, together with payment of plan review fee. b. Execute an Inspection Agreement between the Developer and the District together with initial payment deposit for inspection and/or testing services. c. Complete all street improvements to the satisfaction of the District, or execute Surety Agreement between the Developer and the District to guarantee the completion of construction of all street improvements. ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 October 5, 1994 Page 2 3. Furnish copy of Final Plat showing street names as approved by the Local Government Agency having such authority together with payment of fee charged for the manufacturing and installation of all street signs, as required. 4. If Public Rights-of-Way Trust Fund deposit is required, make deposit to the District in the form of cash or cashier`s check for the amount specified by the District. 5. Furnish easements, agreements, and all other datum or documents as required by the District. 6. Furnish Final Plat drawings for District acceptance, certifications, and endorsement. The final plat must contain the signed endorsement of the Owner's and Land Surveyor's certification. 7. Approval of the plat is valid for one year. An extension of one year will be considered by the Commission if requested within 15-days prior to the expiration date. Please contact me at 345-7680, should you have any questions. LS cc: Development Services Chron J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. MERIDIAN CITY HALL INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE :GLENN J. RHODES. President SHERRY R. HUBER. Vice President JAMES E. BRUCE, Secretary T0: ACHD Commission GRENHAVN/DSTECH 10-5-94 DATE: September 29, 1994 FROM: Development Services SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIVISION Meridian - Preliminary Plat; Annexation/Zoning (Developer - The Development Co., 1903 S. Gull Cove Place, Meridian, ID 83642) (Engineer/Surveyor - J-U-B Engineers, Inc., Gary Lee, P.E./L.S., 250 S. Beechwood Ave., Suite 201, Boise, ID 83709) FACTS & FINDINGS• 1. Greenhaven Estates is a 14.8-acre, 40-lot single family resi- dential subdivision located on the west side of Meridian ap- proximately 900-feet south of Ustick. There are 1,940-feet of new public streets planned. This application includes Meridian annexation and zoning from RT to R-4. 2. GENERAL INFORMATION: LEAD AGENCY - Meridian ACRES - 14.8 FEET OF NEW PUBLIC STREETS - 1,940 LOTS - 40 PRESENT ZONING - RT PROPOSED ZONING - R-4 ESTIMATED VEHICLE TRIPS PER DAY - 400 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE - 263 L.F. OF FRONTAGE ON Meridian Road - 377-feet MOST RECENT TRAFFIC COUNTS - N/A FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP DESIGNATION - Minor Arterial ADA COUNTY RIDGE-TO-RIVERS PATHWAY PLAN - Lane EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY - 60-feet REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY - 90-feet; 45-feet from centerline Meridian Road is fully improved with 44-feet of paving and 5-foot sidewalks. ada county highway district ;;18 East 37th Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 PRELIMINARY PLAT - GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIVISION October 3, 1994 Page 2 IMPACT FEE BENEFIT ZONE - West Ada IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - Western Cities 3. The parcel currently contains two single family dwellings located on the east end that will be removed. 4. This application is proposing a stub street to connect with Lansbury Lane subdivision to the south (29-foot back-to-back street section in 40-feet of right-of-way) and a stub street for future intra-neighborhood connection to the north (37-foot back-to-back street section in 50-feet of right-of-way). Fu- ture developments to the north will be required to turn this roadway to the north to prevent a straight throughfare. 5. The preliminary plat indicates the drainage area in the north- west corner of the parcel is to be owned by ACRD. Staff recom- mends the drainage area be platted as a separate lot, owned and maintained by the homeowners association. 6. Staff recommends the developer consider the installation of two speed humps, one near Lots 13/14, Block 1 and the other near Lots 6/7, Block 3. 7. This application is scheduled for public hearing by the Meridi- an Planning & Zoning Commission on October 11, 1994. SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: 1. Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Meridi- an Road abutting parcel (15 additional feet). The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone. 2. Dedicate a 15' x 15' triangle (or appropriate curve) of right- of-way at the north and south corners of Meridian Road and the proposed Hardt Street abutting parcel to keep the street im- provements in the public right-of-way. 3. Direct lot or parcel access to Meridian Road is prohibited, in compliance with District policy. Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. 4. Replace unused curb cuts on Meridian Road with standard curb, gutter and sidewalk. 5. Utility street cuts in the new pavement on Meridian Road will not be allowed unless approved by the District Commission. 6. The drainage area in the northwest corner of the parcel shall be platted as a separate lot, owned and maintained by the homeowners association. PRELIMINARY PLAT - GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIVISION September 29, 1994 Page 3 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS: 1. Street and drainage improvements of-way shall be designed and District standards and policies. required in the public right- constructed in conformance with 2. Dedicated streets and drainage systems shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and poli- cies. 3. Specifications, land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACHD shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54-1215. 4. Provide written approval from the appropriate irriga- tion/drainage district authorizing storm runoff into their system. 5. Locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drain- age appurtenances, etc.) outside of the proposed street im- provements. Authorization for relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. 6. Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across par- cel. 7. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District for review and appropriate action. 8. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and appropriate action by ACHD. The proposed drainage system shall conform to the requirements of Meridian and shall retain all storm water on-site. Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the public right-of-way or in a common lot owned by a homeowners association set aside specifically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, or other valuable ameni- ties placed in said lot. Drainage lots and their use restric- tions shall be noted on the plat. 9. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for review and appropriate action by ACRD. 10. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot property lines when the driveways are not being shared with the adjacent property. PRELIMINARY PLAT - GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIVISION September 29, 1994 Page 4 11. Developer shall provide the District with a copy of the record- ed plat prior to the installation of street name signs. Street signs will not be ordered until all fees have been paid and a copy of the recorded plat has been provided to ACRD staff. The copy of the recorded plat shall show the recording information as inscribed by the Deputy County Recorder. 12. Install a stop sign on every unsignalized approach of a project street to an intersection involving a collector or arterial as the cross-street. The stop sign shall be in- stalled when the project street is first accessible to the motoring public. 13. Aright-of-way permit must be obtained from ACRD for all street and utility construction within the public right-of- way. Contact Construction Services at 345-7667 (with zoning file number) for details. 14. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any require- ment or policy outlined herein shall be made, in writing, to the Manager of Engineering Services within 15 calendar days of the original Commission action. The request shall include a statement explaining why such a requirement would result in substantial hardship or inequity. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. STAFF SUBMITTING: Larry Sale DATE OF COMMISSION APPROVAL: OCT 0 5 1994 N d ~ ~ Wj Z W W `i`iZ ^~ ~ vv ^~v ~~ ~~~~~~ ZZ ~~ d~ 3 as ao r3Q~~~ o~~~ ~' ~°~ ~ o~o3zmoa~z ~~ mm o~°~~° ~~nrn ey& °~C-iWoi?ag ~~~°~o> ~ ~~ ga ~~aa ZZc~ ao~~a~~m~~i'i~L~~v`''i~~~oe~in~i ~ii~n~coet'ii~~~'Lao~~~~i~ ~ I I i l ! I q . C I I I. u ~ I "-~ I II ' u I I v I ~I~ I ~- - .. I iir i ., I ~$ I ^ ----- -- -0.M~------- ~I a N 0 II J -~ ~'I i I ~ I~~I I I~ I I~ I I I ~ I~ I I ~_ _ ~~ ~ I b I I I `' ~ 11 ~iP~~~ !~ _ I•- I I ~ 1' I ~- I I ~ I ~~ I --- I ~~ .. I it I ~' - _ i 11 I I I f I ~ - ~1 - - ~ i ~ I' - ~ ~- --r----- I_ :3_ I ' _ ~ _ '! - I {---~--i -- ~ ~~, ., I 1 ~~ ~I- I ~ ~ ~ ~I 1 _, ~~_-__~ ---I R ~~ ~ I , • L-=______~ ~ I . ~ _ ~i I I i I I ~ ~• v w 0 M II '•i !., ' ~ ~~ i li D i ~_ ~` _~ ~, ,. ~~ . _ ,~: ,~, ,~ ,. .: ~- I~ I~ I t~ ~~- I 1 . - _~ -~ _ - -- - - _ _ - - - - =+r- - i T I ~~ I ~ I d ,~ I ~ I . '~ ~ I ~ i~ I 1 I j i OrOY NVIOIi13W 'N E M• iE ~ ~ (~ O ~ .~ - ~A oK • 'g ~ ,.. i ~ r :Qe i I ^^ ~ I ~ ' T a ~ ~~ ;_. _ i ~ . ~ ~ I ~ \ ` ~ ~ y ~ ~~ -~ ~ ~ W I ~ St ~ . I . ~,~~ , f ' ~ #~ ~~ I 3s - S N~ J o Y 1~ ~~ ... 9I~ I . ~ - s I W R ~: ~ j ~ ~ fi ~ r Y j~R ~ <„ -- .- ~p i YtS :Y dY ~s ~ a o}- w Q~ ~, S r SYS 8~ ZZ 0 F u , ^t 'W"i _ ~ F aa~ JI ~~ WI e N ~ - t; ,; a _ ;z ~~~ s~ .~ d _~a g. ¢~ ~t~~l~~:~:i~~f ~~ ~li ~ < .,, ~l ~• I ~ ~ ~ I ~ I $a d~ _yy 3. Y C C k 5 w Y ! ~g 5 ~ Q p 8 1 ~ ~ ,s ~ 3# _~ ~}s ~~. {~ i~~ ~ ' ~~ X11 Ft . p~ ~o i' ~ jjs { :, '¢ > i `y ~ j~ s 7 ~ ~~i ~F Z ~ 3 ~ ~~ i~ a~(~ lii gl ~j ~ -ia . ; s = M r f ?f 3) ~~ IT ~~ Is~;~ j• e t~ t: s iiii ~ ~ J~ i~~ ~, ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ -S ~ ~ ~~ tI ~j1d~ ~jj a Y 3T~ i ~~~A , i i s~ ~~ ~~~E_ ~ ~) ~F{ y j =~I/ ~tq1 j ~ = si`i{ I •ST A~{ i.l Ai~~~{ •i VICINITY MAP ~~ _ -- --- __ .__ us~tetf ~~ - -~ ~ ~~ 2 ' S~~ 1 4 i~;,4 PROPOSED HOMAN ANNEXATION 8~ ,~Or. GI~ENMIAVEN ES TES SUBD. '~ ~~~8~ _ MS .. - i 5~ ~ pSSER ~~. ... _~~_ 1, 1 r - ~7VV ~T~l;~~~~ 'Y~f I i~i~ i i7 ~~s~~~T~ i ~~_r I 1' I I i --: I I i ~ - I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ J a ~ - I , i i I ~9 ~ ,~ 'rV CLAIRE ~ ~ ~~~.~ ~ r________^~,.., ~-- ~ ~ ~° LANSB ~ ' Y I (LANE ; i :~ i , ~ .2 S 14 ~- .~ •7 i 8 IZ , 3 I li r3 19 9 6 S ~ '~ ' ~ e ', _ - ~ ,. ~ ~. - , ~ • ~ - --. .- .-- --~ --- ---• f32. 5 _ - - ~ -- -- _ -- - ~ ~ --- - _ 2 i2: 9 a r6 !S 4 IS .33 n y IC 9 8 7 a S- ,o - - S 2 -- ~ '~4 \ ~. 1 ' ~ i I W'. vVJJDBURY R, ~ W. WOOD BURY DR. 24 ~ ~ 12 II I~ I9 8 (T I6 IS 1~2 II IO 19 ~ T ,6 ti S ,p 1 . 4 ~ ' U9. 4~ T , I I 32 I ~ z O '~3 'fl ~~9 ,/ W T £FtbURY U 2S , -' ~ - IT le ~s zo a zt 24 I _ j ' W TEREU ~ RY PARp 0. x '' 1 I ~ I7 16 i5 ~ 14 I ~ I ~` 16 I , 27 126 ~ 2 d a,7 ~ 29 ~ 2s 23 2_ 20 9 . g „ ~ - - i i + , wA'ER9URY wY W ~;p-ERBURY OR W « ~ I ' I~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ - h i s l 4 1 2 1 24 I 23 ~j 2` ~ Zil 19 i9 1T 16 1 IS ~ i ~ I j 12 I I 1 C 9 0 7 6 4 ~ ~ ~ 7 I 2S 5. I 8 7 OR N~. B ~ 6 ~ ~• i 4 S I 2 i l 12 II /MIO /9 ~i~ 6 S ~ E '; - _ - 2• w CHRISFIE D DR ~ . L ~ a tiDR tips 8 ~ ~ .` 22 ~ "' ~, g I S ~ 4 ~ ~-, _/ - RI ~T ~~~ _ 3S`- f 4' '~ L%.a Z1i:L~~.. ...Y ~.... SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET ~ ~~.~~~~~~~i Proposed Development Name _GREENHAVEN ESTATES City MERIDIAN Date Reviewed 10/13/94 Preliminary Stage XXXXX Final Engineer/Developer J-U-B Engrs. Inc /The Development Company The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Boise City Street Name Ordinance. The following existing street names shall appear on the plat as: "N. MERIDIAN ROAD" "N. WEST 3RD AVENUE" The following new street name is approved and shall appear on the plat as: "W. DELENA COURT" "W. DELENA STREET" The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTE GENCY RESENTATIVES OR DESIGNEES 1 Ada County Engineer John Priester Date !0 l3 Ada Planning Assoc. Terri Raynor Date ~ J G1 I Meridian Fire District Representative Date NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed !!!! Sub Index Street Index NUMBERING OF LOTS AND B CENTRAL •• DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT REVIEW SHEET ~~'~~`,~~L6 Environmental Health Division Return to: ^ Boise ^ Eagle ^ Garden city Meridian ^ Kuna ^ ACZ Rezone # OCT 0 ~ Cdr ~ ils`~' %sd~iCS4~1~'~ ~. Co ' Tonal Use # Preliminary Final /Short Plat . cEj ~"7J /`~j'T /~~l E:S~777)~S ,S~/~ l) / Lr.S %O.°.' ^ I. We have Objections to this Proposal. ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type. of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. We can Approve this Proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: ^ 2 feet ^ 4 feet 7~ 7. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ,®-central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water ~. 8. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines [3~central water 9. Street Runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ 10. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ 1 I. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 12. 13. Date: ~/ ~ /~ +ed By: fDHD 10!91 «D, rev. II/93 III We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY COUNCIL MEMBERS OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., Clty Clerk MAX YERRINGTON CITY OF MERIDIAN GARY D. SM THS P.EYCity Eng near WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste ware. supt. Planner 6 Zoning Administrator KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chiet IDAHO 83642 MERIDIAN "BILL" GORDON, Police Chiet W L , JIM JOHNSON . . WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 8884433 ~ FAX (208) 887813 ("_ ~ - Chairman • Planning 8 Zonrng Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2E11 _, ,~,.. GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor `" ~! TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPIVI`ErYT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 4 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/19194 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning with a Preliminar~Plat for Greenhaven Estates BY: The Development Comaany LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Meridian Road and South of Jstick JIM JOHNSON, P2 MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MOE ALIDJANI, P2 MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) JIM SHEARER, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT CHARLES ROUNTREE, P2 ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION TIM HEPPER, P2 CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH - GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR ~NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT BOB CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) WALT MORROW, C/C U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) MAX YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) WATER DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) SEWER DEPARTMENT CITY FILES BUILDING DEPARTMENT OTHER: FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS:~I,p? ~ 1\'tPYI d, an Irrigation POLICE DEPARTMENT District's Onweiler Lateral courses along Meridian CITY ATTORNEY Road The right-of-way of the Onweiler Lateral CITY ENGINEER is 50 feet • 35 feet to the right and IS feet to CITY PLANNER the left of center facing. downstream. See Idaho Code 42-L~ nR RT('HTS nF WA NOT SUB JECT TO ADVERSE POSSESSION The developer must contact J h Anrlarcnn nr Rill HPnCnn a t 466 0663 or 345-2431 for a~nroval h fo anv encroach- n o ment or chap e of ri ht-of-wa occurs. This District re uires that a Land Use Chan a/Site Deve opment app ication e i e or review prior to ina p atting. Contact Donna Moore at 343- or - or urt er in ormation. atera sand waste ways must be protected. Municipa sur ace rainage must a retaine on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must review drainage plans. It is recommended that irrigation water be made available to all developments within this District. Bill enson~istant Water Superintendent ~~i~ Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District ~E~~~ ~Y~ SAP 2 $ ~~~~t CITE OF ~~F~~~iA HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY COUNCIL MEMBERS OFFICIALS RONALD R. TOLSMA A Good Place to Live WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., Clty Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE MORROW T W CITY OF MERIDIA GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer WAL . BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES r tr t A JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. ominis a c Planner b Zoning KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chlet MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 JIM JOHNSON W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chlef Attorney JR TON Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887813 ~"~ ~; ;' ~°„~ ~~ Chairman • Planning 8 Zoning ., , WAYNE G. CROOKS Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 ~-' ~ ~`~ "~ ~ ~~~ y GRANT P. KINGSFORD n ~ ~ w Mayor `~ C~'Y OF ~~~~;~~~-~ TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning 8~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 4 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9119194 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning with a Preliminary Plat for Greenhaven Estates BY: The Develo~nent Company LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Meridian Road and South of stick JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P2 TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT C:ITV ~TTnRI-1Fv MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT _~DA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8- FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLp,MATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: We require a permanent 10-foot wide public utilities easement along all lots adjacent to a road right-of-way dedicated to public or private usel RS Sdo w^1 0~ Tim Adams ~l~ ~a'4'''~s Idaho Power ~_Z; -f~f 322-2047 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY COUNCIL MEMBERS OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA C CITY OF MERIDIAN I V D. SMT HS P.E. Clty Engefeer GARY ORROI WALT W. M BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste water supt. Planner 3 Zoning Atlministraccr KENNY W. BOWERS, Flre chief IDAHO 83642 MERIDIAN "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief W L , JIM JOHNSON . . WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Chairman • Planning 8 Z~ni~g Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 4 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/19194 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning with a Preliminary Plat for Greenhaven Estates BY: The Development Company LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Meridian Road and South of Jstick JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM ~ FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ~~~~T~~ ~ 3 0 ~~~~# CITE' ~F :~~~~~31A~ ~~~~s~~~ October 5, 1994 Planning & Zoning Commission City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Greenhaven Estates Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, ~~ ~: ~ 1 1 1994 ~. , o ~a. i .~rLaltl./j~iti We have received the certified notice for the proposed Greenhaven Estates Subdivision and would like to commend the developer on his proposed densities. However, in order to establish continuity with our neighboring properties and the aesthetic quality that has already been established for our particular area of Meridian, we respectfully request that the following restrictions be recommended to the City Council prior to approval of this project: 1) That the entrance of Greenhaven Estates be designed and reviewed by the City prior to acceptance and that it be required to be more than the cedar fencing that you see in most subdivision entrances. The entrance to a neighborhood is what most people will see and thus sets the impression for the neighborhood and helps influence the future atmosphere of the City. A quality entrance reflects a quality neighborhood and a quality City. Thus, we suggest an entrance designed with either brick, stone, or extensive landscaping. 2) That "islands" be required in the street to slow traffic on the straight road as it was in Lansbury Lane (see Exhibit A). It has been suggested that speed bumps be used to slow traffic in Greenhaven, common sense says that speed bumps will only force Greenhaven residences to use Lansbury Lane for ingress/egress in order to avoid the bumps. We recommend speed bumps on the side road between Lansbury Lane and Greenhaven Estates and islands on their main road to slow their traffic, thus accomplishing the task of slowing cars while evening out traffic between the two neighborhoods. 3) We understand that the minimum square footage in an R-4 zone is 1,400 sq ft. We also know that in certain circumstances that the City has required a greater minimum than that set by the ordinance. Based on the following facts, we feel that this project warrants similar consideration, and thus request that a reasonable minimum of 1,600 sq. ft. of living space be required in Greenhaven. Greenhaven is situated between Lansbury Lane which is averaging 2,000 sq. ft. homes (based on 19 homes and a minimum of 1,700 sq. ft.) and the Sweet properties which have 2,650 sq. ft. and 2,200 sq. ft. homes on 5 acre lots. Gary Lee, the engineer for Greenhaven, communicated to Sherri Stiles that the economics involved in the larger lots would dictate larger homes. The developer however, told us that he was building in Greenhaven the same type homes he built in Elk Run only on larger lots and that economically it was feasible because he was both developer and builder. We do not feel that allowing 1,400 sq ft houses built between projects with homes of 2,000 to 2,650 square feet is good long term planning for the City of Meridian not to mention the economic injustices placed on our properties. It is difficult for us to imagine driving down Meridian Road and having an Elk Run sandwiched between Lansbury Lane and the Sweet properties. It is with this image in mind that we appreciate your consideration of our concerns regarding the Greenhaven application. Sincerely, C~~ S /~ Lrrttt~2$ fJ~v~La~°FP L~~/ i~ ~~~~ N /mil e</L~l~{%" /~o~' . _~ C , ~ p pi /1/. i'Y ~~~ ~3 ~ c ~ c c~:~ ~~ ~~~ R~ U~~ ~~c ~~wS ~~ ~. ~~ G~iS ~~ ~l ~~ ~. ~ l~bf~~' dam`" .L yy Cl~'1~°L G?rt v~+) 1 ~~~ r~ 9 / ~~: ~tiS ~ ~~> ~~ ~'~' ~ ~ ,~,~ ~~~ y~~ j ,~y ~~ ~~ s ~ G~.S ~~ Pr~ , C~~ 1 ~y~W~rwS ~''~ L~~~~'`~ J ~~~ rte, L!~~ ~~r f ~; l~•~' tfj ~ i~• 1~~~ y~~r~. ~ !~ j ~'~ Ltn+~ HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS YlAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk JANICE GASS. Traaeurer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR.. Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS. Fire Chief BILL GOROON, Police Chief GARY SMITH, P.E, Clty Engineer MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888433 FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL, GARY D. SMITH, P. E. LOUNSBURY LANE' ., tANNE:+:ATIOTfi~. ZON~:ING, PLANNING & ZONING I PREL I MI NARY°• PLAT ) :. COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBEAT GIESLEA MAX YERRINGTON f~BERT D. CORRIE Chairrnsn Zoning 6 Planning JIM JOHNSON Centennial CoorCinator PATSY FEDRIZZI May 6, 1993 ,, ".a a ° s. I have revieweci'~ this ~t~is~'~`'`arrci~'~~o~f~f~r the following comments far your inforsiation and 'or -.Cons~ideratifln as conditions of the 1' •?' applicant durxrfg your,,~,;decsiam making process: az ~ ; 1. Lounsbury, 4parrcel~ i-s cant i:guous t=a . McCord,; parcel which i s 5 v,. cant i gurus t o the prE;.vlnf~us~l"y '"'.annexed Wat erbury Park tPetet^sotrr.) parce°l: '~"~ _ ~'h~'s ~ ~y. .p ~. The chord-. distancfof q~t-!'re" t~a-o< f~Ia9 " lot~~3 must be 40 feet, minimum $,~ ~ ,'' 3. Lots and H1 oc.ft. ~~~need t o be numbered;. ~~ ~ 4. Shaw stt^eet names. k, ,: '~ y~ ~.. 5. A vat^iance request istn~req~iired for the length of culdesac shown. The maximum culdesac length, from center of intersecting street to center of culdesac, is 450 feet. b. Nothing is shown on the submittal regarding proposed sanitary sewe?^, domestic water, drainage and/or irrigation ditches, fire hydrants and street lights. These items need to be addressed. Sanitary sewer access is a problem as a route needs to be established westerly out of this property (and not down a lot line), across adjacent proper^ty not in ownership of either Lounsbury or McCord and under the South Slough. The sewer service question has been disc4essed with the applicant in only a vet^y genet^al way. This needs to be resolved. 7. Who will be responsible for saintenance of any storm drainage facilities? 8. The right of way width shown in the notes is 40 feet. Should this be 50 feet as shown on the drawing: g. The applicant has proposed a landscaped parkway to help soften the straight line of the main road. I have talked with Wayne Forrey with .y conceT^n of higher than normal vehicle speeds on this roadway alignment. Wayne suggested positioning several landscaped islands on roadway centerline with adjacent "eye-brows" in the curb and gutter to help slow the vehicular traffic. j ~~JJiJi:JilfJiii~a ~!^~~ s~NE ~ o ~~ ~ ~usssnsnunss~ • X~ etssaeusessuass 7c :sssasss..».....j ~!f Q ~sttt~art:~stt~s~ • p ~j aietttiii#tiiitisi ~ ~ (ice. 44t~4t4R9t44R3l=~' ~ $ ~ ~ P1 ttssstssttsts:std[ i fl eleassssasstusu` ~ i ~'0 ,.t===.tt..!ls... ~ m l.tSLttfftffi!!.i ~ '• ass:ussaasssssss~ ~ r y ~ 14 iiuiiiiiiiieiiis! ~ e'esLstitf~itaee~ftf~pt% ~ ~ 1A iiii:iiiiiiJiiJi~' ~ M 1 J ~7~ Pall ~ J />•!7 L•dl ~ ~ O 1 1 ~ I ~ ~ C ~' 1.~f~• ~ •Z 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .._ T 1 N A ~ \ r ~ ~TT~ ~ ~ N ~ 4 ~ r ~~ 1 ~ a L r D 1 D ~a *Z ' 'm s ' ~ a ' ~ ., ~ ,a,~= ~ ~~a~ ~~~ ~~ .. w•r !. wwr .. ~+'~' ~. u~ ` ~~ s~#~~ '; ~~ s ~'j ~ December 5, 1994 Meridian City Council City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Greenhaven Estates Dear Meridian City Council, We have received the certified notice for the Estates Subdivision and would like to commend his proposed densities. However, in order to continuity with our neighboring properties an quality that has already been established for of Meridian, we respectfully request that the restrictions be made prior to approval of this l~ ~ C 1 3 i~s~ proposed Greenhaven the developer on establish d the aesthetic our particular area following project: 1) That the entrance of Greenhaven Estates be designed and reviewed by the City prior to acceptance and that it be required to be more than the cedar fencing that you see in most subdivision entrances. The ~ttrance to a neighborhood is what most people will see for years to come and thus sets the impression for the neighborhood and helps influence the future atmosphere of the City. A quality entrance reflects a quality neighborhood and a quality City. Thus, we suggest an entrance designed with either brick, stone, or extensive landscaping. The total estimated cost of such an entrance, based on Lansbury Lane, is approximately $200.00 a lot. This amount is minuscule based on the longevity of such an investments' effectiveness. 2) That "islands" be required in the street to slow traffic on the straight road as it was in Lansbury Lane (see Exhibit A). It has been suggested that speed bumps be used to slow traffic in Greenhaven, common sense says that speed bumps will only force Greenhaven residences to use Lansbury Lane for ingress/egress in order to avoid the bumps. We recommend speed bumps on the side road between Lansbury Lane and Greenhaven Estates and islands on their main road to slow their traffic, thus accomplishing the task of slowing cars while evening out traffic between the two neighborhoods. The total estimated cost per island, based on Lansbury Lane, is approximately $100.00 a lot. Again, the amount of this investment is minuscule. 3) We understand that the minimum square footage in an R-4 zone is 1,400 sq ft. We also know that in certain circumstances that the City has required a greater minimum than that set by the ordinance. Based on the following facts, we feel that this project warrants similar consideration, and thus request that a reasonable minimum of 1,600 sq. ft. of living space be required in Greenhaven. Greenhaven is situated between Lansbury Lane which is averaging 2,000 sq. ft. homes (based on 19 homes and a required minimum of 1,700 sq. ft.) and the Sweet properties which have 2,650 sq. ft. and 2,200 sq. ft. homes on 5 acre lots. Gary Lee, the engineer for Greenhaven, communicated to Sherri Stiles that the economics involved in the larger lots would dictate larger homes. The developer however, told us that he was building in Greenhaven the same type homes he built in Elk Run only on larger lots and that economically it was feasible because he was both developer and builder. We do not feel that allowing 1,400 sq ft houses built between projects with homes of 2,000 to 2,650 square feet is good long term planning for the City of Meridian not to mention the economic injustices placed on our properties. It is difficult for us to imagine driving down Meridian Road and having an Elk Run sandwiched between Lansbury Lane and the Sweet properties. It is with this image in mind that we appreciate your consideration of our concerns regarding the Greenhaven Estates application. Sincerely, - ~, YL1.L.i. iJy~~ ~l„r ~l ~l`L~-~ 5llydL` ~~ ~j' ~ ~~ l S y~(.L~1 ~ `' ~~ti~~ ~~ ~ ~"L 611 r.~-~~ G i,~1~°~' Zl,{~~ ~2S G~! ~"~-"v~ ~l ~~ ~ ~ / ~ ~~ ~~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ VV~ ~~-`i /C]~j / -7 ~~ T 1 L'Y~l.'~ ~ 4~ IJ ~~ G-~ ~t/'i ~~ l:~r~l'~~ ~7~ ~ti~ C~~~ ~ t~ IUUvi,~ w~1nPy ~~~` , - G(E~7. i ~~i/ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ C'' r~"SEiG~ Gf Z~ G/ G ~~ l>,~rT~~~, ~z ~J c,~n HUB OFTREASURE VALLEY `~- -~~r/l~ OPFlCIALS WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk JANICE GASS. Treaauror BRUCE D. STUAFiT, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR.. Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste water supt. KENNY BOWERS. Flro Chief BILL GORDON. Pollee Chisf GARY SMITH, P.E. Cily Enpinex MEMORANDUM T0: FROM: A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208)888.4433 FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL, CANNING 8 ZONING GARY D. SMITH, P. E. , COUNCILMEN RONALD R.70LSMA ROBERT GIESLEA MAXYERRINGTON ROBEAT O. CORRIE Chairman Zoning ei Planner; JIM JOHNSON CentennialCoortlinator PATSY FEDRIm May 6, 1993 RE : LOUNSHURY LANE ~~ ~ ~ `~~ ;-: °, tANNEXATL~N~~ ZON'~,NG PRELIMINARY°- PLAT) ,,. ~ y ~ ti , Cf : / ~'.. : Y~'a, bye -.,..+4 N 1' gad' ;~ H'~ ,~ be M5. d y c I have reviewed= this 9~~ i~">aia' a afrt'o~''f~,r the following comments for your information and !or ~on~iderati~n as Conditions of the applicant dur=~ng youw,,~ec~sio~ rsakin~g process. ~` Y 1. Lounsbury ' p~ c~1.s~ f'c z ato~us McCord parcel which i s cont i gulius t o ~' fr~ ~~1~S,~W~usa"al Y ~F'annexed Wat erbury Para tPeterson.) parce~i~,`'J _.~ a. ``~ .l 2. The chord.. distapcre»~of~-he~ f~'ag'`~ lots' must be 40 feet, _~~~ ~ ~f~. mini mum. `'~ ~" °P' 3. Lots and Hl o~ciis~need t o be numbered. ~ ~~~ ~~,~ ,~ -, 4. Show street name~s:;~ `"*'`~ -...~........M.:.... 5. A vat^iance request is required fo>1^ the length of cu esac shown. The maximum culdesac length, from center of intersecting street to center of culdesac, is 450 feet. 6. Nothing is shown on the submittal regarding proposed sanitary sewer^, domestic water, drainage and/or irrigation ditches, fire hydrants and street lights. These items need to be addressed. Sanitary sewer access is a problem as a route needs to be established westerly out of this property land not down a lot line}, across adjacent property not in ownership of either Lounsbury or McCord and under the South Slough. The sewe'<^ service question has been discussed with the applicant in only a very genet^al way. This needs to be resolved. 7. Who will be responsible for saintenance of any storm drainage facilities? 8. The right of way width shown in the note is 40 feet. Should this be 50 feet as shown on the drawing: 9. The applicant has proposed a landscaped parkway to help soften the straight line of the main road. I have talked with Wayne Forrey with my concern of higher than normal vehicle speeds on this roadway alignment. Wayne suggested positioning several landscaped islands on roadway centerline with adjacent "eye-brows" in the curb and gutter to help slow the vehicular traffic. ,, :.:i::t:.........~ ................. ~~~a~~.~~~~~~»~~ n;iststit;a;iit^t~j " "~ ~ s~ ~~I1iJiiii~iitiii~t ~7"~~ $~MO ~ ~ p ~ wRRR~ 7772Pwww ~!~ r j itustssaiiittssa~ , t tttnuutatsiis r ~C ~T~ sssissss......«.i ~~ Q ~stnn:t:~~tiiss • s ftfftttititiittti~ ~ ~ Qom. 1illRtSl~4Rt444t3' ~ $ ~ i ~ f1 ..iit..:....ttiii~ ~ SS t.tiiiii.iiii.it. ~ -~v t.tKtittfitlti.t V ~ ' rn tttttiiiiiiitttti~ r ~.sa.stiisi:.ss.aj a~tsssasisaasttts ssssstttteisssa~ ~ .fit..titi..iiii. ~ r t;~~~ats~~~at~us' ~ =sse:e.sa.:..a..::'f: ~ r 33iiii::iiiiiiiJ~, ~ ~ Jf•'If4 YMt.~JI~l7 itA ~' A ~ O ~ PI • i 1 ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ w ~ •!" 3 ~ C • w ~~~ H ' ~ r ~~ 1 !Y y O ~ ~ 1 1 ~~D ~Z ' 'm s ~ ~ ., ~ ' ,~• a .' ~,~: ~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~, ~~~~ ~ -~ s~ ~ .ice ~~ ~.i u October 18, 1994 Ms. Shari L. Stiles Planning & Zoning Administrator City Of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, ID 83642 Dear Ms. Stiles: J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. ENGINEERS•SURVEYORS•PLANNERS 250 S. Beachwood Avenue, Suite 201 Boise, ID 83709-0944 208/376-7330 FAX: 208/323-9336 RE: Preliminary. Plat for Greenhaven Estates The following are our responses to your comments dated October 7, 1994, for Greenhaven Estates. 1. The centerline on Meridian Road will be indicated on the preliminary plat. 2. A 20' landscape adjacent to Meridian Road has been included in the preliminary plat. 3. All ditches which require tiling will be included in the final design which will be reviewed and approved by Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District. 4. ACHD is not requiring any landscape islands in the right-of- way. ACRD is recommending speed control bumps, which we intend to use in our final design. 5. The preliminary plat will be adjusted so that the minimum 40' chord requirement is met on all cul-de-sac lots. 6. The name of the North-South street, N. N.W. 3rd Street, is displayed on the preliminary plat. 7. Roadway widths and radius lengths will be included on the preliminary plat. ~~-u Engineers Surveyors Planners Ms. Shari Stiles October 18, 1994 Page 2 8. A variance request for the proposed cul-de-sac length will be submitted prior to the City Council public hearing for the preliminary plat. 9. The houses in this development will be built between 1,400 and 1,800 sq. ft. of livable space. 10. Perimeter fencing will be included in the final design plans in accordance with the development agreement. 11. A development agreement will be submitted by The Development Company. Having reviewed your comments and addressing each one, there appears to be no restricting conflicts between the City of Meridian standards and this development of Greenhaven Estates. After review of this response and the updated preliminary plat, it would be greatly appreciated if a recommendation for approval of said preliminary plat of Greenhaven Estates be forwarded to the City Council members. Thank you for your assistance on this project. questions please let me know. Sincerely, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. -~~ Gar A. Lee, P.E./L.S. Project Manager GAL/mep Enclosures cc.: The Development Company If you have any Project: 18857 ~~~~~~~~ M ~Y ~ 11~~s CITY OF ~IERIDIAt~ MAY 14, 1996 Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: NORTHWEST CORNER EAGLE RD. & FRAIVI~I,IN , S.H.-55 G~~^ MA-2-96 Dear Sirs, The Idaho Transportation Department has reviewed this application. Access will be prohibited from Eagle Rd. Thank you for giving us this opportunity to respond on this matter. If you have any questions please call Lou Sanchez at 334-8327. Sincerly; Gary W Moles,P.E. District Traffic Engineer GWM:LRS:Irs - An Equal Opportunity Employer - TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT DISTRICT 3 P.O. BOX 8028 BOISE, ID 83707-2028 (208) 334-8300 .~ ORDINANCE NO. 687 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., ADA COUNTY, STATE OF IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to annex to the said City real property which is described in Section 1 below: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho: Section 1. That the real property described as: All that certain real property situated in Section 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., Ada County, State of Idaho, described as follows: A portion of the NE 1/4 of Section 1, further described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap being the East one quarter corner of Section 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M.,; thence North 00°17'24" East, 1,724.96 feet along the East Section line, (formerly known as North, 103.43 rods) to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 89°19'43" West, 1,735.54 feet (formerly known as West, 105 rods) parallel to and 933.40 feet South of the North line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1; thence South 00°07'18" West, 381.18 feet, (formerly known as South, 21.76 and 10/11 rods) parallel with and 924.00 feet East of the West line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1; thence South 89°27'04" East, 1,734.40 feet (formerly known as East, 105 rods) along the North line of Lansbury Lane Subdivision, as filed in book 64, page 6499 of Plats, Ada County Records; thence North 00°17'24" East, 377.53 feet, (formerly known as North, 21.76 and 10/11 rods) along said East line of Section 1 to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - GREENHAVEN ESTATES Page 1 i ~ is hereby annexed to the City of Meridian, and shall be zoned R-4 Residential; that the minimum house size built on the property shall be 1,600 square feet; that the annexation and zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for annexation and zoning. Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de- annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements: a. That the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer and resolve how the water and sewer mains will serve the land. b. That the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan adopted January 4, 1994. c. That, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, K, L of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian and other matters. d. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, and 11-9-605 M. which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways . e. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind the Applicant, the titled owners, and their assigns. f. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and meet the Ordinances of the City of Meridian. Section 3 . That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy of the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - GREENHAVEN ESTATES page 2 • within ten (10) days following the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this ~ ~~'day of January, 1995. ~~• ,~~`'',.:,,~;,`~s ~~~~-.~ APPROVED: p~ ~J` ~r. ~ R.:.~s~~.;C ~ MAYOR -- G T KIN S RD to, ..{i.A.~.ws1f• ,~T~ ~ ~; ,;,r ~ is i w.. ~ ; . ~ 1 _p ATTE WILLIAM G. BERG, JR -- ITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada, ) I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., ADA COUNTY, STATE OF IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE"; passed as Ordinance No. 687, by the City Council and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the ~ day of January, 1995, as the same appears in my office. DATED this ~ r`t,~~C~;~of January, 1995 . ~~ ~; "x ~„ .~ ~~ Ali rCt s .~(, ' ~ i ~ -<. ~ Y.. ~ i.. x. :1~y '`':~ ~, `' p,, '' y~• .~: Y' ~'~ City Clerk, City of a idian ~, ~ y ~'H *y' ° ~ ~' °~ Ada County, Idaho ' ~ r _} ..,t. y.~ ,.f. .:e. ~,~~`? tC 9 ~~, } ~M ANNEXATION ORD~TidANC~ ~~ ,G1~F~NHAVEN ESTATES Page 3 • STATE OF IDAHO,) • ss. County of Ada, ) On this .~ day of January, 1995, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. /'~J No a Public for Zdaho R si ing at Meridian, Idaho ommission Expires ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - GREENHAVEN ESTATES Page 4 I.; I i'I f I r l~ ~ ~ ~~ Y / .~ ~~ ~, O V . . 35,18/ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~R Q '1'~; ~ Q s ` p U1 ~ ~ ; ~ ~ 1• i.. ~ - ~ Y D N N. G~°t1~ n N v 0 z ~ /, , z Z~ .L~ V m I I'-'-- l- I i , I I I it I II p it I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I 111 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I i I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I / I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 II I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I ~ I I ~ 1 I I I I I 1 .I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I -~ 1 1 I II t! m -~~ Q • Meridian City Council December 15, 1994 Page 10 Kingsford: Your decision on the rezone. • Morrow: Mr. Mayor I move we adopt the decision from the Planning and Zoning Commission which is they recommend to the City Council of the City of Meridian the application for rezone from light industrial to R-15 residential should be denied. Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to approve of the decision that was issued by P & Z to deny the rezone request from I-L to an R-15, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #2: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING FOR GREENHAVEN ESTATES BY THE DEVELOPMENT GROUP: Kingsford: At this time I will open that public hearing and invite the owner or his designee to speak first. Gary Lee, 1750 Summertree, was sworn by the City Attorney. Lee: The application before you this evening is a request for annexation and an R-4 zoning with a preliminary plat known as Greenhaven Estates. This particular subdivision is located off of Meridian Road about a 1/4 mile south of Ustick just north of Lansbury Lane Subdivision that just recently went in last year. It is composed of 40 single family residential lots on about 14.88 acres resulting in a density of 2.7 lots per acre. The configuration of the parcel is such that the minimum building lot size is 80 feet by a depth of 164 or about 13,000 square feet. The request again for R-4 zoning, the structures to be built here will comply with the existing zoning ordinance. We do request that the minimum building size remain at 1400 square feet. There is a 20 foot wide common landscape lot adjacent to Meridian Road to act as a buffer. This lot will be held in common ownership and maintained by a homeowners association. Subsequent to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and the findings of fact there were suggestions about revising the plat to allow access to the neighbor on the west boundary. We have done that and I have brought some reduced copies of that plat for your (inaudible). It is shown on the revised plat, we did have a culdesac on the west end of what is shown as Delana Street. That has been eliminated, the road has been extended to the west boundary to allow extensions into the neighboring parcels. And that effect on the parcel is unchanged it is still 40 lots and it worked out fairly well. As can be seen on the preliminary plat we have access off of Meridian Road and also on NW 3rd Avenue to the south connecting into Lansbury Lane Subdivision. The road also extends to the north for future expansion to • • Meridian City Council December 15, 1994 Page 11 parcels on the north side. All the streets of course are public right of way, ACHD standard. You will note that there is a stretch of that NW 3rd is 40 foot right of way that is done to accommodate a connection to an existing 40 foot right of way that is there now. But it does change to a 50 foot once it passes the intersection. The parcel is serviceable by Meridian facilities, sewer and water. There will be a pressurized irrigation system provided in the subdivision. And of course all utilities will be underground as required by ordinance. After reviewing the findings of fact as recommended by Planning and zoning commission in our revised preliminary plat we have not indicated any landscaped median strips along the east west street. We have discussed it with Ada County Highway District at their preliminary plat review and they suggested using the speed bumps in that area. We would like to maintain the 1400 square foot minimum building size to accommodate potential home buyers and leave the market a little wider range. We have addressed the comments from the City Engineers office and the City planning office and responded by letter. And I would be glad to answer any questions if you have any. Kingsford: Questions for Mr. Lee? Tolsma: I have one, on this last (inaudible) rather than the (inaudible) those little bulbs in _ _ the center. Did they prefer the speed bumps over the top of the little bulbs in the center? I L$e: a-don'#-think ~,ey dad a pi`eference si#her way. _ _ Tolsma: Well the problem with speed is that fire trucks and ambulances have a terrible time with those. The little bulbs in there would probably (inaudible) slow the traffic down a little (inaudible) I think Lansbury Lane has that (inaudible). Kingsford: Any other questions for Mr. Lee? Anyone else from the public that would like to offer testimony on this issue? Joe Simunich, 955 W. Ustick Road, was sworn by the City Attorney. Simunich: I have been asked to come here by Mr. Sanford who adjoins this subdivision on the west. He is unable to attend this meeting. I am here in regards to his access road. I have a letter from him here addressed to you folks about some discussions that have been done for an access road and also there is a plat here that has a lot designated more or less for the access road approximately southwest of this existing culdesac on the previous plan. So I will give this letter and this copy to the Council here and you can take it from there. Thank you. Kingsford: Joe, have you seen this latest copy that he just submitted? C~ Meridian City Council December 15, 1994 Page 12 Simunich: No I haven't. • Kingsford: You might take that and give it to Mr. Sanford maybe if we could compare where you are saying that Mr. Sanford, you are talking about this is going to be an access, does his property go up as far north as this to grant him access or would you know? Simunich: (Inaudible) Kingsford: In discussions with Mr. Sanford he and I were concerned about that as well and I want to make sure this grants him access certainly. Simunich: (Inaudible) (End of Tape) Morrow: Mr. Mayor, is Mr. Sanford's property landlocked? Kingsford: That particular parcel is landlocked with regard to a public street. There is a private lane that is a deeded lane that he does not own that he has some concerns about having access to, ____ ___: Morrow: How large a parcel is his -property? (Inaudible) Kingsford: That is Venable Lane that he has to come in from Ustick on. Morrow: I understand that, the point is if that is a somewhat questionable access then and we have no other access to this property other than what this may provide? Kingsford: That is correct. Morrow: So that is a major issue. Kingsford: For him to consider development and to be able to develop on a private Lane that is deeded to someone else he h as some real concems. Anyone else from the public? Chris Williams, 4185 S. Linder Road, was sworn by the City Attorney. Williams: I am here representing the Lansbury Lane Homeowners Association. We have got 3 concerns I would like to address the Council with. One would be the entrance of • Meridian City Council December 15, 1994 Page 13 Greenhaven Estates. In Lansbury we have tried to establish a little bit nicer entrance. We have a piece of property in Lansbury Lane, if you look at the plat of Lansbury Lane and the plat of Greenhaven Estates they are almost identical with the exception of the additional depth of those lots, the additional 13 feet on those lots. The cost based upon Lansbury Lane of doing something in brick, we didn't necessarily want anything in brick but just something a little bit nicer than a cedar fence which would deteriorate, landscaping, stone just something. The cost that we spent in Lansbury Lane to make this investment which I think 50 years down the road will still be a pretty nice entrance, it is low maintenance, I think it will be pretty nice down the road. Landscaping would be nice down the road, something, a cedar fence in 10 years isn't going to look very good. It is a maintenance issue also. We spent approximately $200 a lot to do the entrance that we did, which I didn't feel was a real major expense based upon the longevity of how long it is going to be there. Our second concern which was recommended by the Planning and Zoning to the Council is we requested a 1600 square foot minimum on the homes in Greenhaven Estates. The reason for this is because we are dealing with a 350 foot wide piece of property that is set between Lansbury Lane, Lansbury Lane with 19 homes in it out of 41 now designated we are averaging 1950 square feet on our homes. To the north on the other side 350 feet away from Lansbury is the Sweet's property they have 2650 home .and a 2200 square foot home each on 2 acre lots. Dan Sweet has a plat which was designed on his and his fathers property 23 lots on 10 acres, 2.3 lots an acre. It kind of makes it so it-goes from Lansbury 2.9 -lots an acre to 2.7 to 2.3, I thinK it is a real good progression there in a short space. But,-with-the 2 houses he has on that property now and the square footage they have got they are so big that what he was looking at doing was something similar to what he already has there in home square footage. So if we go from 2000 average or 1950 average to 1400 square feet to 2200 or 2600 square feet in a 350 feet span it doesn't make a lot of sense. We respect the developers right to develop this property, we wanted to be reasonable that is why we came up with the 1600 square foot number it just gave us a little bit of a buffer to where there wasn't such a big span between the house sizes and the square footage. The minimum in Lansbury is 1700 by the covenants in a single story, 1800 on a 2 story. The third issue that I wanted to address was the speed bumps and the islands. Lansbury Lane if you look at the letter that was sent, that I had written and sent to you showed the requirement of the bulbs. I spent a lot of time out in Lansbury Lane, the effectiveness of the landscaped island to slow down traffic on a straight road, I found to be really effective. You will find that there are still high school kids that will speed through there but the high school kids will jump speed bumps too. My concern about the speed bumps is if you have 3 speed bumps between this intersection that is backing the subdivision in Meridian the people now that it is stubbed out to the west it makes logical sense that in order to avoid the speed bumps people are going to come from the future developments over here and including the west end of Greenhaven and go through, cut down through Lansbury to avoid the speed bumps. It is common sense, that is what I would do. This is a 28 foot back to back right of way it is a • Meridian City Council December 15, 1994 Page 14 restricted right of way, the stub street going into Greenhaven. So you are dealing with a restricted right of way plus we are getting traffic from Greenhaven going through our neighborhood. The landscaped islands we feel have been pretty effective as far as aesthetics I think they are really nice. As far as controlling the speed of the traffic I think as far as I can tell so far they have been really effective. But as far as where we stand if there is not going to be islands we would actually prefer no speed bumps because that will keep the traffic from diverting over into our neighborhood through the restricted right of way and that is our concerns. In the minutes, I have something else, in the minutes which were approved at the P & Z meeting Gary Lee said that islands are a possible solution to help control the traffic. Kingsford: A comment Mt. Williams, it wouldn't just be high school kids that would speed their mothers and fathers do and it sounds like a developer that just spoke might to since he is going to cut through there. Williams: I found it really has slowed people down the islands. The cost of the islands and I went back and pulled the numbers was $100 a lot which I didn't think was a very big expense. A $100 on a $30,000 lot, $100 a lot that is minuscule. Kingsford: Just an observation, any questions? Anyone else from the public that would like to offer testimony on this issue? Seeing none I will close the public hearing. Counselor?_ _ _ __ Crookston: The testimony is basically the same. Kingsford: Is the Council prepared to adopt the findings prepared for P & Z. Morrow: I have a technical question and I am drawing a blank. Do these findings ask for the bulbs within the streets as opposed to speed bumps? Kingsford: They did not. Crookston: These findings don't pertain to the plat. Kingsford: They are with regard to the annexation. Crookston: There are comments in them that pertain to some things on the plat because that is what was testified to. Kingsford: The Council will notice that the next item on the agenda is the preliminary plat request. Which there is also a public hearing on the plat, I assume the testimony might Meridian City Council December 15, 1994 Page 15 be similar. Morrow: Having resolved that then I would move that we adopt the findings of fact and conclusions of law as prepared by the P & Z Commission. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to approve of the findings of fact and conclusions of law as prepared and submitted by P & Z, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Corrie -Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: What is the Council's pleasure? Morrow: I believe our decision would be that the property be annexed and zoned R-4 residential with the conditions set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law -including that the minimum size houses to be built in the subdivision be 1600 square fee# and that the applicant and owners be specifically- required to the all ditches, canals, waterways and install. a pressurized irrigation system as conditions of annexation and that the applicant meet all `of the ordinances of the City of Meridian to- and__including the development time requirements and enter into the required development agreement. And if the conditions are not met that the property be deannexed. Kingsford: Entertain a motion then to have the Attorney prepare an ordinance. Corrie: So moved Morrow: Second Kingsford: Moved by Bob, second by Walt to have the City Attorney prepare an annexation and zoning ordinance, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Crookston: The direction was to pass the ordinance but did you approve of the annexation and zoning? Kingsford: We approved the findings of fact, we can't approve the annexation and zoning until there is an ordinance prepared can we, isn't that the process? Meridian City Council December 15, 1994 Page 16 Crookston: That is true, no question here. • ITEM #3: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR GREENHAVEN ESTATES BY THE DEVELOPMENT GROUP: Kingsford: I think some of the people spoke to that, if they have different testimony I would invite them to address that. Mr. Lee did you want to say anything different with regard to the plat? Asa matter of policy we have listed those separately because from time to tim we have inadvertently omitted doing the plat so we have lifted those. At this time I will open the public hearing and invite anyone that would like to comment further on the plat for Greenhaven Estates. Joe Simunich, 955 West Ustick Road, was sworn by the City Attorney. Simunich: The Mayor gave me a plat here for this road extension to the Sanford property. I would just like to ask, I think it is Mr. Lee possibly to give Mr. Sanford and see if this will work for everybody. Possibly some changes may be in order. Thank you. Kingsford: Certainly I would echo that 1 want to make sure that does not get landlocked back there. Anyone else from the public that would like to offer testimony. Mr. Williams it would be dully noted your interest in the plat. Is that all right Counselor? Crookston: You can adopt his statements into this record. Kingsford: Direct the City Clerk to adopt those comments into this record. Anyone else from the public that would like to offer testimony? Seeing none I will close the public hearing. Council Morrow: Questions of Gary and Shari, your comments, Mr. Lee indicated in his prior testimony that they had addressed those comments by way of letter to you, was the resolution of 18 items that you had sited Gary satisfactory? Smith: Yes they were Councilman Morrow. Morrow: And Shari you had 11 items that you were concerned with was that resolution satisfactory? Stiles: With the exception of I still would like to see the landscaped islands in there in lieu of the speed bumps. Kingsford: Any other questions of the Council or comments? Is it the Council's desire to Meridian City Council December 15, 1994 Page 17 adopt the preliminary plat, I would ask them to include a condition that it accesses Mr. Sanfords property to the salification of (inaudible). Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we adopt the preliminary plat of Greenhaven Estates subject to staff conditions with the added 2 conditions that the landscaped bulbs be included within the roadway and that access be guaranteed to Mr. Sanford's property so that it does not become landlocked. Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to approve the preliminary plat for Greenhaven Estates conditioned upon staff comments being met that the landscaped lots be included in stead of speed bumps and that access be assured to Mr. Sanford's property to the West, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #4: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR REZONE FROM R-15 TO C-C BY DIANE AND ROBERT LANG: - Kingsford: At this time I will open that public hearing and invite their owner or designee to speak first: Roen Wilson, 1567 Leslie Way, was sworn by the City Attorney. Wilson: I don't know just what I am supposed to say or what I am supposed to do here. This building will be used as antique and collectible. shop. I think that we have done everything that we are supposed to do in the meantime. We have gotten the site plan from the engineer and they called today and said that the Ada County Highway Department had approved it. So if you have any questions? Kingsford: Any questions of the Council? Wilson: This is easy. Kingsford: So far, thank you very much. Is there anyone else from the public that would like to offer testimony on this issue? Seeing none I will close the public hearing. It is getting easier all the time. Counselor? Crookston: It is just fine. t ~OG'~I BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION HOMAN AND THE DEVELOPMENT GROUP GREENHAVEN ESTATES ANNEXATION AND ZONING PORTION OF THE N 1/2 NE 1/4 SE, SECTION 1, T.3N., R.lE MERIDIAN, IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for consideration on October 11, 1994, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the Council having heard and taken oral and written testimony and the Applicant not appearing but through Gary Lee, Professional Engineer, and having duly considered the matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of public hearing on the annexation and zoning was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for October 11, 1994, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the October 11, 1994, hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations; 2. That the property included in the application for annexation and zoning is described in the application, and by this GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 1 ~ T ~ • • reference is incorporated herein; that the property is approximately 14.88 acres in size; it is on the west side of Meridian Road between Cherry Lane Road and Ustick Road; that it is adjacent to Lansbury Subdivision; Strasser Farm Subdivision lies to the north. 3. That the property is presently zoned by the county RT (Rural Transition) and the proposed use would be for R-4 Residential type development. 4. The general area surrounding the property is used agriculturally and residentially. 5. That the property is adjacent and abutting to the present City limits. 6. The Applicant is not the owner of record of the property, but he has submitted the consent of the titled owners, John W. and Candy ~. Homan and :Donald F. and Rae Jean Homan. - '7.'' That the property included in the annexation-and-zoning application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 8. That the parcel of ground is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 9. That the Application requests that the parcel be annexed and zoned R-4 Residential; that the present use of the property is for two residences and for limited agriculture; that the applicant indicated that the intended development of the property is for R-4 Residential development with houses containing a minimum of 1,400 square feet; that the Applicant has submitted a preliminary plat. GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 2 • 10. That Gary Lee stated at the hearing that the density would be 2.7 dwellings units per acre, that there would be a 20 foot landscaped buffer along Meridian Road, that the lots would be approximately 13,000 square feet, that the R-4 requirements would be met, the streets would meet ACRD requirements, that they would request a variance on the cul-de-sac length, that the Onweiler ditch would be used for pressurized irrigation, that the road medium would be landscaped, that the homes would be from 1,400 to 1,800 square feet, and that the City Engineer's comments would be met. 11. It is also stated in the Application that Onweiler canal and other irrigation ditches would be tiled to continue delivery of irrigation water and that other smaller irrigation and drainage ditches that deliver water to this property only would be abandoned;-that pressurized irrigation would be constructed to each _ __ __ -lot and a pumping station tentatively planned to be--located at t e northeast corner of the development, which irrigation system would be operated by Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District; that access to the sewer line for purposes of maintenance, is still being worked out with the owner of the property, Mr. Bob Flaten and the developer of Lansbury Lane Subdivision, Mr. Cris Williams. 12. There were property owners in the immediate area that testified objecting to the annexation and zoning of the parcel: a. Rich and Gloria Fern testified that their concerns have to do with the traffic constantly being in front of their property once the development is finished with the flow coming in and out of the complex; that the Ada County Highway District and Shari Stiles have commented there GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 3 • • are an estimated 400 vehicle trips per day that will take place; that vehicle lights will be hitting directly onto their duplex and as the vehicles turn the lights will be crossing their entire residence; that street lighting won't be offensive if proposed; that a concern over their tenants backing out of their residences onto Greenhaven Estates Street; that adequate duInpsters be made available at the construction site to care for blowing debris and that the developer put sound walls and landscape barriers to curtail some of the noise and lessen the visual impact of headlights to preserve privacy. b. Dan Sweet testified regarding the size of the house the developer plans for this development; that the property north of this proposed development has houses in the 2600 square foot range; that when the zoning starts to go down to R-4 the size and price of the homes in the area diminish; that the Commission stick with not real expensive developments and little so so developments; that he too, is concerned about the increase of traffic. c. That John Sanford testified that his 7 1/2 acres east of Vendable Lane, which is a private, deeded lane, is landlocked; that he needs access; that he was told Vendable Lane would be made a through street when the Waterbury Park No. 5 was being developed; that the engineers for Waterbury Park No. 5 development, Brian Smith, Hubble Engineering, told him they were going to make a stipulation to cross the slough onto Mr. Sanford's property so he would have access into Waterbury No. 5; that now Mr. Smith says this is not true, that they did away with that; that kids are already coming from Lansbury Subdivision chasing his horses which are across the ditch; that Vendable Lane needs to be a public street; that the Ada County Highway District said they figured he would never want access for reasons of development because of the large arena he has for cutting horses; that Mr. Sanford never received notice of Waterbury 5 Subdivision being finally approved and that they are not going to go across the canal like Mr. Sanford was earlier told. d. That Joe Simunich testified as to the irrigation and the Onweiler Lateral; that on the plat for Lansbury Subdivision the covenants say no irrigation water will be provided to the lots; that now this developer is scheduling pressurized irrigation; that those established in the area are not likely to give up their water rights; that for years there has been a rotation on that lateral; that the question arises as to how the developer plans to water all these proposed lots on a 12 hour rotation when GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 4 • water only comes 12 hours out of every 8 days; that when these subdivisions come up, we in the area get a product or ditch or something that is unsatisfactory like fences built right on top of the irrigation line causing people not to have access to their head gates. e. Chris Williams testified that he liked the density; that he desire restriction of an entrance which included a brick wall, islands in the roadway, that the frontage setbacks be alternated, that the homes should be a minimum of 1,600 square feet. 13. That the property is in an area marked on the Generalized Land Use Map of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as a single family residential area; that in the Comprehensive Plan property inside the Urban Service Planning Area may be developed at greater densities than one dwelling unit per acre. 14. That in the Rural Area section of the Comprehensive Plan, Land Use, Rural Areas, Section 6.3, it does state that land in agricultural activity should so remain in agricultural activity until urban services can be provided. 15. That Meridian has, and is, experiencing a population increase; that there are pressures on land previously used for agricultural uses to be developed into residential subdivision lots. 16. That the property can be physically serviced with City water and sewer if the Applicant extends the lines. 17. Meridian Police Department, Meridian Fire Department, Meridian City Engineer, Meridian School District, the Central District Health Department, Ada County Highway District, Ada County Street Name Committee, Idaho Power, U. S. West and Nampa Meridian Irrigation District did submit comments and such are incorporated GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 5 herein as if set forth in full. That the Meridian Planning Director did submit comments among which were that a 20 foot minimum landscape strip is required along Meridian Road outside of the proposed right-of-way, all ditches are to be tiled and approval obtained of Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District obtained prior to applying for building permits, that landscaped islands should be placed on the roadway centerline, that a variance was needed for the length of the cul-de-sac, that the property to the south has a minimum house size of 1,700 square feet, that perimeter fencing is to be installed, and a development agreement is required as a condition of annexation; that the City Engineer commented that the legal description needs to be resubmitted pursuant to Resolution 158, that the seasonal high ground water elevation needs to be determined and a profile of the sub-surface soil conditions was needed, that -the irrigation ditches crossing the parcel need to be tiled, that` a master street drainage plan needed to be submitted, and that the fire hydrant placement needed to be coordinated with the Water Works Department. 18. It is particularly noted that the Ada County Highway District , in its site specific requirements, stated that the stub street shown running to the north should run to the west. 19. That the R-4, Residential District is described in the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 3 as follows: SR-4) Low Density Residential District: Only Single Family Dwellings shall be permitted and no conditional uses shall be permitted except for Planned Residential Development and public schools. The purpose of the (R-4) District is to permit the establishment of low density single-family GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 6 .~ • dwellings, and to delineate those areas where predominately residential development has, or is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, and to protect the integrity of residential areas by prohibiting the intrusion of incompatible non-residential uses. The (R-4) District allows for a maximum of four ( 4 ) dwelling units per acre and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian. that the R-4 zoning district requires a minimum of 1,400 square feet to be included in houses in that zone; that the Applicant's representative stated that the subdivision applied for would comply with the R-4 requirements. 20. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Residential Policies, 2.1U states as follows: "Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi-family, town houses, apartments, condominiums, etc. ) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities." 21. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Rural Areas, 6.3 c., it states as follows: "Within the IIrban Service Planning Area development may occur in densities as low as 3 dwellings per acre if physical connection is made to existing City of Meridian water and sewer service and the property is platted and subdivided . .' 22. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Rural Areas, 6.4, it states as follows: "Residential development is allowed in the rural area provided that said development does not exceed the Rural Residential Agricultural density, unless it is inside the Urban Service Planning Area and City sewer and water is provided, then Low, Medium and High density residential may be considered. All residential development must also comply with the other appropriate sections of this plan." 23. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Housing, Housing Policies, at page 66, it states as follows: GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 7 • "1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile homes, multi-family, town houses arrangements), ." "1.3 An open housing market for all persons, regardless of race, sex, age, religion or ethnic background." "1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping centers should be encouraged." 24. That there is a population influx into the City of Meridian at the present time which has been going on for some time and is likely to continue; that the land is relatively close to Meridian and economic conditions are making it difficult to continue farming in the area. 25. That in 1992 the Idaho State Legislature passed amendments to the Local Planning Act, which in 67-6513 Idaho Code, relating to subdivision ordinances, states as follows: "Each such ordinance may provide for mitigation of the effects of subdivision development on the ability of political subdivisions of the state, including school districts, to deliver:.`services without compromising quality of service delivery to current residents or imposing substantial additional costs upon current residents to accommodate the subdivision."; that the City of Meridian is concerned with the increase in population that is occurring and with its impact on the City being able to provide fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services to its current residents and to those moving into the City; the City is also concerned that the increase in population is burdening the schools of the Meridian School District which provide school service to current and future residents of the City; that the City knows that the increase in GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 8 • • • population does not sufficiently increase the tax base to offset the cost of providing fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services; and the City knows that the increase in population does not provide sufficient tax base to provide for school services to current and future students. 26. That pursuant to the instruction, guidance, and direction of the Idaho State Legislature, the City may impose either a development fee or a transfer fee on residential property, which, if possible, would be retroactive and apply to all residential lots in the City because of the imperilment to the health, welfare, and safety of the citizens of the City of Meridian. 27. That Section 11-9-605 C states as follows: "Right-of-way for pedestrian walkways in the middle of long blocks may be required where necessary to obtain convenient pedestrian circulation to schools, parks or shopping areas; the pedestrian easement shall be at least ten feet (10') wide." 28. That Section 11-9-605 G 1. states as follows: "Planting strips shall be required to be placed next to incompatible features such as highways, railroads, commercial or industrial uses to screen the view from residential properties. Such screening shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') wide, and shall not be a part of the normal street right of way or utility easement." 29. That Section 11-9-605 H 2. states as follows: "Existing natural features which add value to residential development and enhance the attractiveness of the community (such as trees, watercourses, historic spots and similar irreplaceable amenities) shall be preserved in the design of the subdivision;" 30. That Section 11-9-605 R states as follows: "The extent and location of lands designed for linear open space corridors should be determined by natural features and, GREENIiAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 9 .~ ~ • • to lesser extent, by man-made features such as utility easements, transportation rights of way or water rights of way. Landscaping, screening or lineal open space corridors may be required for the protection of residential properties from adjacent arterial streets, waterways, railroad rights of way or other features. As improved areas (landscaped), semi- improved areas (a landscaped pathway only), or unimproved areas (left in a natural state), linear open space corridors serve: 1. To preserve openness; 2. To interconnect park and open space systems within rights of way for trails, walkways, bicycle ways; 3. To play a major role in conserving area scenic and natural value, especially waterways, drainages and natural habitat; 4. To buffer more intensive adjacent urban land uses; 5. To enhance local identification within the area due to the internal linkages; and 6. To link residential neighborhoods, park areas and recreation facilities." 31. That Section 11-9-605 L states as follows: Bicycle and pedestrian pathways shall be encouraged within new developments as part of the public right of way or as separate easements so that an alternate transportation system (which is distinct and separate from the automobile) can be provided throughout the City Urban Service Planning Area. The Commission and Council shall consider the Bicycle-Pedestrian Design Manual for Ada County (as prepared by Ada County Highway District) when reviewing bicycle and pedestrian pathway provisions within developments. 32. That proper notice was given as required by law and all procedures before the Commission were given and followed. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met; including the mailing of notice to owners of property GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 10 • • within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. 2. That the City of Meridian has authority to annex land pursuant to 50-222, Idaho Code, and Section 11-2-417 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that exercise of the City's annexation authority is a Legislative function. 3. That the CITY COUNCIL has judged this annexation and zoning application under Section 50-222, Idaho Code, Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Meridian City Ordinances, the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the record submitted to it and things of which it can take judicial notice. 4. That all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been complied with. 5. That the Commission may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and State. 6. That the land within .the proposed annexation is contiguous to the present City limits of the City of Meridian, and the annexation would not be a shoestring annexation. 7. That the annexation application has been initiated by the Applicant, The Development Group, and the annexation is not upon the initiation of the City of Meridian, but is at the request of the Applicant. 8. That since the annexation and zoning of land is a legislative function, the City has authority to place conditions GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 11 • . • upon the annexation of land. Burt vs. The Citv of Idaho Falls, 105 Idaho 65, 665 P.D 1075 (1983). 9. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616 which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, 11-9-605 M, Piping of Ditches, and Section 11-9-606 B 14., which pertains to pressurized irrigation; that the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer; that the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance; that, as a condition of annexation the Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address the inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, R, L and prior comments of the previous Planning Director, Wayne Forrey, relating to the lack of adequate recreation facilities and that land set aside for a future park would be desirable, that the City is in need of land set-asides for future public service use; that the development agreement shall, as a condition of annexation, require that the Applicant, or if required, any assigns, heirs, executors or personal representatives, pay, when required, any development fee or transfer fee adopted by the City; that there shall be no annexation until the requirements of this paragraph are met or, if necessary, the property shall be subject to de- annexation and loss of City services, if the requirements of this paragraph are not met. GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 12 • 10. That proper and adequate access to the property is available and will have to be maintained; that it is concluded that as a condition of annexation, access to the property now owned by John Sanford shall be provided; that the access shall be sufficient to meet Ada County Highway District street requirements. 11. That since the Applicant's property is in an area marked as a single family residential area, the annexation and zoning Application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and does not conflict with the Rural Areas policies; but the land does border rural farms or ranches and those farms and ranches shall be buffered and the subdivision covenants shall let the home owners in the proposed subdivision know that the farms and ranches are there and that agricultural uses will, or may, be continued; that this matter shall be addressed in the development agreement. 12. Therefore, based on the Application, the testimony and evidence, the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian it is ultimately concluded that Applicant's property should be annexed and zoned R-4; that the conditions should be those stated above; that such. annexation would be orderly development and reasonable if the conditions are met; that the property shall be subject to de-annexation if the requirements of these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are not met. 13. That all ditches, canals, and waterways required to be tiled by City Ordinance shall be tiled as a condition of annexation and if not so tiled the property shall be subject to de-annexation. 14. With compliance of the conditions contained herein, the GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 13 • annexation and zoning of R-4, Residential would be in the best interest of the City of Meridian. 15. That if the conditions of approval are not met the property shall be subject to de-annexation. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONER HEPPER COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE COMMISSIONER SHEARER COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) VOTED ~'~l VOTED ~~ VOTED VOTED ~"~- VOTED RECOI~II~IENDATION -~ The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the Meridian City Council that the property be annexed and zoned R-4 Residential with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and that the Applicant and owners be specifically required to the all ditches, canals and waterways, and install a pressurized irrigation system, as conditions of annexation, and that the Applicant meet all of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian, specifically including the development dune requirements and enter into the required development agreement, and that if the conditions are not met that the property be de- annexed. MOTION: GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 14 • APPROVED: DISAPPROVED:__ GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 15 • APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian City Council hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions this 15TH day of DECEMBER , 1994. ROLL CALL COUNCILMAN MORROW COUNCILMAN YERRINGTON COUNCILMAN CORRIE COUNCILMAN TOLSMA MAYOR KINGSFORD (TIE BREAKER) (INITIAL) ~n APPROVED v VOTED VOTED VOTED VOTED VOTED DISAPPROVED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - GREENHAVEN ESTATES • • MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: DECEMBER 15.1994 APPLICANT: THE DEVELOPMENT GROUP ITEM NUMBER; 2 8~ 3 REQUEST; PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDMSION ~~ CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION; SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW "REVIEWED" SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ~a ~` C,L ~ ~` INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: r, _ ~ 1~- BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: C~~ OTHER: ~"~ • • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live COUNCIL MEMBERS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk RONALD R. TOLSMA I JANICEL.GASS,CityTreasurer CITY OF MERIDIA CORRE N ROBERTD. GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste water supt. 33 EAST IDAHO j' g~~p SHARI STILES i t A i KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN,IDAH083642 stra or dm n ~~~~-y~~ner&Zoning W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Chairman -Planning & Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 O C T 0 7 9~a~i GRANT P. KINGSFORD M §§~~ i 1'" tY"B~l`i~lU>~~~'~ L~~,~~r r ayor t MEMORANDUM: - October 5, 1994 To; Mayor, City Council, Planning & Zoning From; Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer Re; GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIVISION (Annexation /Zoning & Preliminary Plat) I have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, for your information and consideration as conditions of the applicant during the hearing process: 1. Information contained in the legal description submitted with this application for annexation differs slightly from information on the Recorded Plat of Lansbury Lane Subdivision. Please clear up these discrepancies and re-submit new legal descriptions per Resolution 158 (Aug. 16, 1994). 2. Determine the seasonal high ground water elevation, and profile the sub-surface soil conditions. 3. The Preliminary Plat map Contour lines need to be tied to an established Benchmark. 4. Any existing irrigation ditches crossing the property to be included in this platting, shall be tiled per City Ordinance. Plans will need to be approved by the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. 5. Please provide a master street drainage plan that includes the method of disposal & approval from the affected drainage district. 6. Submit the proposed restrictive covenants and/or deed restrictions for review. 7. Submit letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision name and street names. 8. Coordinate the fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian's Water Works Superintendent. C: \W PWIN60\GENERAL\GRNHA V N. P&Z • • 9. A 250 Watt High Pressure Sodium Street Light will be required at the subdivision's entrance off N. Meridian Rd. 10. Existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this subdivision will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for non domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 11. Submit information detailing the traffic impact on existing or adjacent roadways & intersections. 12. Water service to this development is contingent on positive results from a hydraulic analysis by our computer model. 13. Please be advised that the sanitary sewer effluent from this proposed development will flow into the much contentious sewer system installed in Lansbury Lane Subdivision. 14. A variance on the cul-de-sac length will need to be granted in order to develop this parcel in the configuration as submitted. 15. Please label, on the Preliminary Plat map, all the corners that are referenced in the legal description for annexation. 16. Indicate on the Preliminary Plat map the existing and proposed Right-of -Way widths. 17. The Typical Street Sections shown on the Preliminary Plat map don't comply with Ada County Highway District standards. 18. Flease revise the Preliminary Plat Notes as follows; (11.) Lot 2 Block 1.. . (13.) Lot 1 Block 1.. . C: \ WPWIN601GENERAL\GRNHA V N. P&Z • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAkYERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner 8 Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman -Planning 8 Zoning GRANT P. K[NGSFORD Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: Plannin & Zoning om i n, Mayor and Council FROM: Shari L. tiles, Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: October 7, 1994 SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat for Greenhaven Estates 1. Indicate centerline of Meridian Road on plat. 2. Twenty-foot (20') minimum landscape strip is required along Meridian Road, outside of existing/proposed right-of--way. 3. All ditches are to be tiled and approval of Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District obtained prior to applying for building permits. 4. I recommend Applicant include landscaped islands on the roadway centerline with adjacent "eyebrows", similar to the Lounsbury Lane development, to help slow vehicular traffic on this straight-shot roadway. 5. Lot 9, Block 2, must have a minimum chord length of 40 feet. 6. Add name of North-South roadway on plat. 7. Add roadway widths end radius dimension. 8. Applicant will submit a variance request because of the proposed culdesac length. 9. Include minimum house size on plat. Adjacent property to the south has a minimum house size of 1,700 square feet. 10. Perimeter fencing to be installed as required by development agreement. 11. A development agreement is required as a condition of annexation. HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk MAX YERRINGTON S CITY OF MERIDIAN ROBERT D. CORRIE P.E. Clty Engineer GARY D. SM TH WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. s 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES upt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste water Planner s Zoning Administrator KENNY W. BOWERS, Flre Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887813 Chairman -Planning 8 Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-22! 1 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning 8~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 4. 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9119/94 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST: Annexationlzonina with a PreliminarX Plat for Greenhaven Estates BY: The Development Comaany LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Meridian Road and South of Ustick JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C TBOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF REC ION(PRELIM 8~ F L PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: '~ YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: ~d ~'- a 4 E~ ~ -~7+ ~° 11~' rs.n... -... .._- - OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Weste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chiel W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAVNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 ,--v, x'° ~!-° ~ ~ p r 8 Zoning Administrator ~~'ti,. ~~ ~ ~ • a JIM JOHNSON Phone (208) 888.4433 ~ FAX (208) 887-4813 Chairman • Planning 8 zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 ~ ~ Gy ~f O ~{~~~ d, GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor ~~ & y' a° ;~':Y.,t'rih~l{il~i TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Cterk by: October 41994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/19/94 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning with a Preliminary Plat for Greenhaven Estates BY: The Development Company LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Meridian Road and South of Ustick JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P2 TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C TBOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER f`ITV DI ~AIAICD MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES ~_ ~ ~ _ ~ , OTHER: `7 YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA CITY OF MERIDIAN WALTW MIORROW • S~INTENDENT OF SCHOOLS ~~~~ `~ DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OR EXCEL Dan Mabe, Finance & Administration ~c !~. t~ ~ ~ _ 1, ~tS~'Sj~ ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT y~ t~ `a JJ Christine Donnell, Personnel & Instruction ~~~~~ "' CITY OF MERIDII~~ DIRECTORS Sheryl Belknap, Elementary Jim Carberry, Secondary Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911 MERIDIAN STREET MERIDIAN,IDAH083642 PHONE(208)888-6701 2 Q ~~ October 3, 1994 City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: Preliminary Plat for Greenhaven Subdivision Dear Councilmen: I have reviewed the application for Greenhaven Subdivision and find that it includes approximately 40 homes at a median value of $120,000. We also find that this subdivision is located in census tract 103.11 and in the attendance zone for Chief Joseph Elementary, Meridian Middle School and Meridian High School. The school district may be required to transport elementary students from this subdivision to Ridgewood Elementary or another school that may have capacity, due to overcrowding at Chief Joseph Elementary. Using the above information we can predict that these homes, when completed, will house 14 elementary aged children, 10 middle school aged children, and 9 senior high aged students. At the present time Chief Joseph Elementary is at 101 of capacity, Meridian Middle School is at 139 of capacity and Meridian High School is at 130 of capacity. The Meridian School District is not opposed to growth in our district, however this subdivision will cause increased over- crowding in all three schools. There is little opportunity to shift attendance boundaries since the surrounding schools are also well over capacity. Before we could support this subdivision, we would need land available at a minimum price for a school site in this area. The site would need water and sewer services available. In addition we would need to pass another bond issue for the construction of schools. The cost per student for newly constructed schools, excluding site purchase price and offsite improvements, exceeds $5,000 per elementary student and $10,000 per middle or high school student. • • We are in a difficult position and need your help in dealing with the impact of growth on schools. Sincerely, ~~ Dan Mabe Deputy Superintendent DM:gr • i --~ ,_ ~, ~~~~ =LEfJN J. ~.HOGES, Presiaenr KERRY R HUBER. Vice Presigent =VES E BRUCE, Secrerarv TO: THE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 1903 S. GULL COVE PLACE MERIDIAN ID 83642 FROM: Karen Gallagher, Coordinator Development Services CITY ®~ ~:~~g~~!"~~k October 5, 1994 SUBJECT: GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIVISION - PRELIMINARY PLAT On October 5, 1994, the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District (hereafter called "District") took action on the Preliminary Plat as stated on the attached staff report. In order that the Final Plat may be considered by the District for acceptance, the Developer shall cause the following applicable standard conditions to be satisfied prior to District certification and endorsement: 1. Drainage plans shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District. 2. If public street improvements are required: Prior to any construction within the existing or proposed public right-of- way, the following shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by the District: a. Three complete sets of detailed street construction drawings prepared by an Idaho Registered Professional Engineer, together with payment of plan review fee. b. Execute an Inspection Agreement between the Developer and the District together with initial payment deposit for inspection and/or testing services. c. Complete all street improvements to the satisfaction of the District, or execute Surety Agreement between the Developer and the District to guarantee the completion of construction of all street improvements. ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 • • October 5, 1994 Page 2 3. Furnish copy of Final Plat showing street names as approved by the Local Government Agency having such authority toctether with payment of fee charged for the manufacturing and installation of all street signs, as required. 4. If Public Rights-of-Way Trust Fund deposit is required, make deposit to the District in the form of cash or cashier's check for the amount specified by the District. 5. Furnish easements, agreements, and all other datum or documents as required by the District. 6. Furnish Final Plat drawings for District acceptance, certifications, and endorsement. The final plat must contain the signed endorsement of the Owner's and Land Surveyor's certification. 7. Approval of the plat is valid for one year. An extension of one year will be considered by the Commission if requested within 15-days prior to the expiration date. Please contact me at 345-7680, should you have any questions. LS cc: Development Services Chron J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. NtERIDIAN CITY HAL3~ • v ~ INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE GRENHAVN/DSTECH GLENN J. RHODES, President 10-5-94 SHERRY R. HUBER, Vice President .JAMES E. BRUCE, Secretary TO: ACRD Commission DATE: September 29, 1994 FROM: Development Services SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIVISION Meridian - Preliminary Plat; Annexation/Zoning (Developer - The Development Co., 1903 S. Gull Cove Place, Meridian, ID 83642) (Engineer/Surveyor - J-U-B Engineers, Inc., Gary Lee, P.E./L.S., 250 S. Beechwood Ave., Suite 201, Boise, ID 83709) FACTS & FINDINGS• 1. Greenhaven Estates is a 14.8-acre, 40-lot single family resi- dential subdivision located on the west side of Meridian ap- proximately 900-feet south of Ustick. There are 1,940-feet of new public streets planned. This application includes Meridian annexation and zoning from RT to R-4. 2. GENERAL INFORMATION: LEAD AGENCY - Meridian ACRES - 14.8 FEET OF NEW PUBLIC STREETS - 1,940 LOTS - 40 PRESENT ZONING - RT PROPOSED ZONING - R-4 ESTIMATED VEHICLE TRIPS PER DAY - 400 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE - 263 L.F. OF FRONTAGE ON Meridian Road - 377-feet MOST RECENT TRAFFIC COUNTS - N/A FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP DESIGNATION - Minor Arterial ADA COUNTY RIDGE-TO-RIVERS PATHWAY PLAN - Lane EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY - 60-feet REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY - 90-feet; 45-feet from centerline Meridian Road is fully improved with 44-feet of paving and 5-foot sidewalks. ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 PRELIMINARY PLAT ~REENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIV«ON October 3, 1994 Page 2 IMPACT FEE BENEFIT ZONE - West Ada IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - Western Cities 3. The parcel currently contains two single family dwellings located on the east end that will be removed. 4. This application is proposing a stub street to connect with Lansbury Lane subdivision to the south (29-foot back-to-back street section in 40-feet of right-of-way) and a stub street for future intra-neighborhood connection to the north (37-foot back-to-back street section in 50-feet of right-of-way). Fu- ture developments to the north will be required to turn this roadway to the north to prevent a straight throughfare. 5. The preliminary plat indicates the drainage area in the north- west corner of the parcel is to be owned by ACRD. Staff recom- mends the drainage area be platted as a separate lot, owned and maintained by the homeowners association. 6. Staff recommends the developer consider the installation of two speed humps, one near Lots 13/14, Block 1 and the other near Lots 6/7, Block 3. 7. This application is scheduled for public hearing by the Meridi- an Planning & Zoning Commission on October 11, 1994. SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: 1. Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Meridi- an Road abutting parcel (15 additional feet). The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone. 2. Dedicate a 15' x 15' triangle (or appropriate curve) of right- of-way at the north and south corners of Meridian Road and the proposed Hardt Street abutting parcel to keep the street im- provements in the public right-of-way. 3. Direct lot or parcel access to Meridian Road is prohibited, in compliance with District policy. Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. 4. Replace unused curb cuts on Meridian Road with standard curb, gutter and sidewalk. 5. Utility street cuts in the new pavement on Meridian Road will not be allowed unless approved by the District Commission. 6. The drainage area in the northwest corner of the parcel shall be platted as a separate lot, owned and maintained by the homeowners association. PRELIMINARY PLA~ GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDI~ION September 29, 199ZF Page 3 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS• 1. Street and drainage improvements required in the public right- of-way shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and policies. 2. Dedicated streets and drainage systems shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and poli- cies. 3. Specifications, land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACRD shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54-1215. 4. Provide written approval from the appropriate irriga- tion/drainage district authorizing storm runoff into their system. 5. Locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drain- age appurtenances, etc.) outside of the proposed street im- provements. Authorization for relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. 6. Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across par- cel. 7. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District for review and appropriate action. 8. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and appropriate action by ACHD. The proposed drainage system shall conform to the requirements of Meridian and shall retain all storm water on-site. Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the public right-of-way or in a common lot owned by a homeowners association set aside specifically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, or other valuable ameni- ties placed in said lot. Drainage lots and their use restric- tions shall be noted on the plat. 9. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for review and appropriate action by ACHD. 10. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot property lines when the driveways are not being shared with the adjacent property. PRELIMINARY PLAT ~GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIV~ION September 29, 199 Page 4 11. Developer shall provide the District with a copy of the record- ed plat prior to the installation of street name signs. Street signs will not be ordered until all fees have been paid and a copy of the recorded plat has been provided to ACRD staff. The copy of the recorded plat shall show the recording information as inscribed by the Deputy County Recorder. 12. Install a stop sign on every unsignalized approach of a project street to an intersection involving a collector or arterial as the cross-street. The stop sign shall be in- stalled when the project street is first accessible to the motoring public. 13. Aright-of-way permit must be obtained from ACRD for all street and utility construction within the public right-of- way. Contact Construction Services at 345-7667 (with zoning file number) for details. 14. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any require- ment or policy outlined herein shall be made, in writing, to the Manager of Engineering Services within 15 calendar days of the original Commission action. The request shall include a statement explaining why such a requirement would result in substantial hardship or inequity. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. STAFF SUBMITTING• DATE OF COMMISSION APPROVAL: OCT 0 5 1994 Larry Sale ~ ,µ.Jl `~` ~iP ¢d~ 330 o ~ m~ ~ a a~ ~~ m ~ a ~ o ~ O~ N ~J~ ga03 ~~ OU CODU QO O eo~a~ mi~iPa~~v~ivwi~~~~~V~1~ii ~ ~ l j „ I ~ ~ ~ I I ~ N I. I II I u. E. ' ~ ~I i ii I . .__~,.~ ' I- '-' I 1 --- ~ -~ - --- -1-- ~ - - ~_____====~dl. r IP1~~~1~/ ~1~~ ~ ~ ~~~ I I I I I I - - - 1~ _ J i -I ~ - I- - I _L _ ~ {-- - -- ~v~~N~~~~g~~~oz ~~ vvXXQO ~v Nza (~ Q2' Q ~a[~m Zm~~~~~~J LL K O O oa Z~~~s~~~~~.~~~~~ ~~ ~aaR~Rq~qaa ~? ~ ~ii~n~~oo~i'i~5~~~~0~~~~~ii~ It/ ~.---I .. I i ~ I - ~ 1 I ~ Id~~l I~ I~, I ~ I IJ i ~- _~e~ I I I i I L J ~i ___, ~- i i~ 1~ ~I I I E i - ~ - i - ~ ~ ____ - l -. ti d d N ID O i ^L=~2:,3~, L ~~~ 'Eel .~~o-:'= =a ^~ ~~ ~~s333~~e v 0 M u •s 1^~ J.~ l~ ~~ D / - ~I.. _... PJl 1. .R .~ '~ _ I I P !. ~ L _ ~ I I ~~ I I ~ ~ ~FII ~ - - ~ - ~~;iE~Sl~t~s~d;~3~ ~~i;4 i.--- i i ~~ I i I I I ~ I ! ;.: r '. ~'. -- -1-~ h; ~ I ,, ._ ~3 I~ I^ It Ii ovo~ Nviaiaaw •w ~~ _I tP 1 A u a ~ ~' ..~ ' / `~~ A! E Y I T YS ~ `'~~• ~ ~ }~ ~~I W 1 ~ ( ~ '~ 9~«i ' A i i j~~ u• ~ / ~ ' ~ ~ R ~s ~ ~ .n / - a ~ ~ ~ fi ; ~,x ~;g~ ~ ~ ,., .~~ I . ~ ~3 ~ ~ j.. ~ i Z a Z ~ ~ A c ~ ] L ~-~-- < n ~ i I • _ - y r I~ (f 1~ 2 :R rA ~a~ ;Y d$ ~ p e „ ~- s~ T Y6 ~ Z ~ O F U n, # -. ~i~ N 1 ~ y I 1 W 1 B Si ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~I i i ~ J U_ , RI t ~ ¢ L _ ~ ~ 2~ S t Z i3~ j{ ! ~ &~~ ~3 $ Z a a ~ ~ ~~ II¢ ~ ¢ s~ ~~ H ~. 4 II e C Y a E ~ ee~i ~ ~ ,i 1 ~ ~i, ~~ _~ M i~~ ~ ~ ji ~~~ FZ ': { F ~~ii~ { 9 '~~ ~~~ `~ + _ ~ 9N tt ]]ij{ ~¢E ~ ~ Z N i ~ ~~2 ~ ~ M J ~~11 ~~,~ #~ sis i;s 3= r 4t yy I 7 p ~~ i~~! t` ~~ ~~ 2 j, ,~ fi s} ~~ Z~ {j~l 37 a ~3y' 7 ;~f sa~~ ~ ~~~ ~j~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~• ~~ :,~~ , #1 j ~ #,! i l~s F~~ J~ .~~~fl .~ ~~ ~m 0 C T 2 ~s 199 SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET ~~ Ofi 1~~~il~I,A~ Proposed Development Name GREENHAVEN ESTATES City MERIDIAN Date Reviewed 10/13/94 Preliminary Stage XXXXX Final Engineer/Developer) U-B Engrs, Inc /The Development Com~anv The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Boise City Street Name Ordinance. The following existing street names shall aonear on the plat as: "N. MERIDIAN ROAD" "N. WEST 3RD AVENUE" The following new street name is aonroved and shall a~~ear on the plat as: "W. DELENA COURT" "W. DELENA STREET" The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME CO VES OR DESIGNEES Ada County Engineer Ada Planning Assoc Meridian Fire District John F Terri R Representative Date !d ~3 Date ~ 3 GI Date NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed !!!! Sub Index Street Index NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOC ~ VICINITY MAP ~ ~6 .~ 2 ~ ScP 1 4 i~;,4 PROPOSED ROMAN ANNEXATION ~ c ~. GRENHIAVEN ES TES SUBD. rj -- f ~,V _ MS .. - 5~ R pSSER 1 ~ ;~ ~ , ~ .,. 1 r = 30~ - .r~.ZT~s~~ss~s s~s~sss~s~++«a*~+?~~a~.~~-~-~ I E ~~ 6 S • 3 i 2 I I I !S 12 ~~ j ~C i v _ i 6 a 3 y ~ I j I C I a I 1 l- I t r I i 1 I _~ ~~~~ ~ •~ ~ w CLAIRE ''~ _ ~ ~ ~- --~ ~ ~ Y LANE ; ~ ~•~ ~ i /.2 3 Is ~ ~ .c '7 i ~B IZ 3 2~ li r~ 19~ 9~ 6 S a J '~ ~' I e - d - - ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~~ " r • e --- -- --- ---- ~3z. s - +~~ ~-- ~. 2 ~2. 9 •? r6 !S K 13 :33 u S iC 9 8 7 a S ,• 3 .2 ~~~ I ~ 2s Z7 \ W', rvJODBURY R. ! ~ W. WOOD BURY DR. ~ ti Iz II Ic Is e ~ 6 s ~ li~l 10 19 ~ 7 ,6 S .p I + Vg. • 3 ? , 4 ~ ,~ 32 ~ I z 0 ~~ 9'r~9'/ W gRBURY U z3 -' i \.J ~ - n le ~s zo a 2z za i t ~ ~ W TEIREURY PARp 0. x ~ ~ t I v` 15 3.7 ! 29 28 ~ 2' i 26 ' 2 a, 2e , 23 2'' 20 I9 18 I7 16 IS 14 t., ~ - - { I i ~1 yy Y!A'ERBURY DR W 'rVA'ERBURY WY I ~ _. 2a ! 23 2' 2a7 t9 iB t7 16 ~ IS ' '~ 6 5(< I ~ 7; ~ ~ I t s, 12 U 10 9 8 7 b ` ;• t i j I ~ ~ 5. ~ 8 ~ 7 6 4 ~ 3 2 i 12 ~, II 10 9 ~ ~ 6 j S ~ • ` ERI 2• w. CHRISFIEI.O OR E Io~~e 4 OR "`~'~- ~~ 22 , is IS i, _/' B' -- o r - c ~~ - _ _ ~dR~~ R \I ~i~ RII ~T I J CENTRAL •• DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT Rezone # REVIEW SHEET Environmental. Health Division ~~~~ x~ ~ Return to: ©5 ~~.~,~ ^ Boise ^~•r ^ Eagle C~ Y ~('~"i'!- ~a~r~li~it~id Co ' Tonal Use # PI°eliminary Final /Short Plat 6~~ /~~~ ~cs7)T)~$ S7!$ ~ /1lJ.S /ON ^ Garden aty Meridian ^ Kuna ^ Acz ^ I. We have Objections to this Proposal. ^ 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. ^ 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type. of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. We can Approve this Proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: ^ 2 feet ^ 4 feet [~ 7. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ,~-central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water well ^ interim sewage a~central water ^ individual sewage ^ individual water ~. 8. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: central sewage ^ community sewage system ^ community water ^ sewage dry lines [3JZcentral water 9. Street Runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. ^ 10. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ I I . If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: ^ food establishment ^ swimming pools or spas ^ child care center ^ beverage establishment ^ grocery store 13. ~/f1~S ~ ~t`7r7Z A~tQ.. S "'~ Date:/ ~ /~ ,i~5 77tCf~t7~ !iL~y t~a.4i~ ~ stn ;S~y/I.ylv~t7rt{ Reviewed By: %~Isrw~ t~-Mc~~T- CDND 10/91 rcb, nv. II/93 jll • • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS A Good Place to Live COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., Clty Clerk MAX YERRINGTON i CITY OF MERIDIAN ROBERT D. CORRIE neer GARY D. SM TH, P.E. Clty Eng WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. Waste Water supt. SHAWCROFT JOHN T 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES , . KENNY W. BOWERS, Flre Chfet MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Planner 8 Zoning Administrator W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 .-~, r, - /,^U rcc- ` ,% ~ ~ ('~ 208) 887 2 1 ~ t W /B ildi li k D ~ Chairman -Planning 8 Zoning ( or epartmen c s u ng Pub ~ L- ~ c i GRANT P. KiNGSFORD °;i Mayor ~ ~ , . ~ Jy ~''. - ~ , ~' -, iJ ~("j 1v1'E'1'r1'~ PROJECTS TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEV~ WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 4.1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9!19/94 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST: Annexat~~n~~oning with a Preliminary Plat for Greenhaven Estates BY: The Development ComQ.any LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Meridian Road and South of Jstick JIM JOHNSON, P2 MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) JIM SHEARER, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT -CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION -TIM HEPPER, P2 CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR ~NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT BOB CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) WALT MORROW, C/C U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) MAX YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8r FINAL PLAT) -WATER DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) SEWER DEPARTMENT CITY FILES BUILDING DEPARTMENT OTHER: FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS:~mFa & M r ' d, an T ' gat ~ on POLICE DEPARTMENT District's Onweiler Lateral courses along Meridian - -CITY ATTORNEY Road. The right-of-way of the Onweiler Lateral -CITY ENGINEER is_ 50 feet : 35 feet to the right and 15 feet to CITY PLANNER the left of center facing downstream. See Idaho Code 42-I7 0R--RTI'F1TS-OF-WAY NOT SUB JECT TO ADVERSE POSSESSION. The developer must contact John Anrlarenn nr R; 1 1 HPnsnn a t 4i56-Ofifi3 or 345-2431 for- apnroval before anv encroach- ment or change of right-of-wav occurs. This District re uires that a Land Use Change/Site Deve-I opment apprication e i e or review prior to~ina platting. Contact Donna Moore at 343- or - or urt er in ormation. atera sand waste ways must be protected. Municipa surface rainage must e retaine on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must review drainage plans. It is recommended that irrigation water be Bill enson~istant Water ~~~ Nampa & Meridian Irrigation e available to all developments within this District. RECEg~IE~J Superintendent District SEP 2 8 1994 CITY OF MERIDIAN • • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk MAX YERRINGTON CITY OF MERIDIAN ROBERT D. CORRIE GARY D. SM THS P.E. Clly Enq near WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Waler Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste water supt. SHARI STILES 33 EAST IDAHO Planner a Zoning Administrator KENNY W. BOWERS, Flre Chlet MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chfet WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JIM JOHNSON Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887j1813 ~~~Y'(t ~~`1('1 Chairman • Planning d Zoning jj Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 j, V L+ GRANT P. KINGSFORD ~ ~ ~ _ 3 {®~t, T 1 l Mayor . CITY OF MF~-~~AN TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning 8~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: n~tober 4 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/19/94 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST:-~4nnexation/zoning with a Pretiminarv Plat for Greenhaven Estates BY: The Development Company LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Meridian Road and South of ~ ~~*~ck JIM JOHNSON, P!Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT /'`ITV ~TT~IRNFV MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT _~,DA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8 FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: We require a permanent 10-foot wide public utilities easement along all lots adjacent to a road right-of-way dedicated to public or private used AS SdoW~l oiJ THE PR6~~~+~NA~Y PLAT. Tim Adams ~~ l~nk~s Idaho Power 9-ZT'f~ 322-2047 • • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS COUNCIL MEMBERS A Good Place to Live RONALD R. TOLSMA WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk MAX YERRINGTON CITY OF MERIDIAN ROBERT D. CORRIE GARY D. SM THS P.EyCIty Engineer WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. s t 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES up . JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste water Planner 8 Zoning Administrator KENNY W. BOWERS, Flre Chief IDAHO 83642 MERIDIAN W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief , JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Chairman • Planning 8 Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning ~ Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendation to Meridian City Hall, Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk by: October 4. 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9119/94 HEARING DATE: 10/11/94 REQUEST: Annexation/zoning with a Preliminary Plat for Greenhaven Estates BY: The Development Company LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North of Meridian Road and South of IJstick JIM JOHNSON, P2 MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z -TIM HEPPER, P2 GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER -CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM 8t FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: R S E P 3 0 1~~4 CITY OF IHEKIllIAN • October 5, 1994 Planning & Zoning Commission City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Greenhaven Estates Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, ~ ~~~~~~~ C~ C ~ 1 1 1994 1,.. ~ ~ :w~i:,~.xUlHl~l We have received the certified notice for the proposed Greenhaven Estates Subdivision and would like to commend the developer on his proposed densities. However, in order to establish continuity with our neighboring properties and the aesthetic quality that has already been established for our particular area of Meridian, we respectfully request that the following restrictions be recommended to the City Council prior to approval of this project: 1) That the entrance of Greenhaven Estates be designed and reviewed by the City prior to acceptance and that it be required to be more than the cedar fencing that you see in most subdivision entrances. The entrance to a neighborhood is what most people will see and thus sets the impression for the neighborhood and helps influence the future atmosphere of the City. A quality entrance reflects a quality neighborhood and a quality City. Thus, we suggest an entrance designed with either brick, stone, or extensive landscaping. 2) That "islands" be required in the street to slow traffic on the straight road as it was in Lansbury Lane (see Exhibit A). It has been suggested that speed bumps be used to slow traffic in Greenhaven, common sense says that speed bumps will only force Greenhaven residences to use Lansbury Lane for ingress/egress in order to avoid the bumps. We recommend speed bumps on the side road between Lansbury Lane and Greenhaven Estates and islands on their main road to slow their traffic, thus accomplishing the task of slowing cars while evening out traffic between the two neighborhoods. 3) We understand that the minimum square footage in an R-4 zone is 1,400 sq ft. We also know that in certain circumstances that the City has required a greater minimum than that set by the ordinance. Based on the following facts, we feel that this project warrants similar consideration, and thus request that a reasonable minimum of 1,600 sq. ft. of living space be required in Greenhaven. Greenhaven is situated between Lansbury Lane which is averaging 2,000 sq. ft. homes (based on 19 homes and a minimum of 1,700 sq. ft.) and the Sweet properties which have 2,650 sq. ft. and 2,200 sq. ft. homes on 5 acre lots. Gary Lee, the engineer for Greenhaven, communicated to Sherri Stiles that the economics involved in the larger lots would dictate larger homes. The developer however, told us that he was building in • Greenhaven the same type homes he built in Elk Run only on larger lots and that economically it was feasible because he was both developer and builder. We do not feel that allowing 1,400 sq ft houses built between projects with homes of 2,000 to 2,650 square feet is good long term planning for the City of Meridian not to mention the economic injustices placed on our properties. It is difficult for us to imagine driving down Meridian Road and having an Elk Run sandwiched between Lansbury Lane and the Sweet properties. It is with this image in mind that we appreciate your consideration of our concerns regarding the Greenhaven application. Sincerely, ~~ J `~ ~ ~/o N- /~P~Q/O /AN d2Q, ~~~~~ _ ate-, s tJ . ~~;..~.~, ~.~,., ~ ~•~ ~~l"~ R,~r G~vS v'2~"WS a~¢r~ Ry 2`l~ ~" ~r,~e~ ~~ ~/, G l~ '1~e C~dS yvtt~kwS H 2$ i''U'~~ L 1/b~~'i ~~ ~~~ ry ~~s r S ~ ~ ~'P'~' b~ ~ C"~~ i1 ~L +~. Carr °,~ t~~ w. L~,eaQl~ (~~ +~; ~~ 2~ ~~ ~~~i t fj ~ ia~. G~ yzrr~ ~ raj ~~ c /~rj'CRi~~ri+~ X23 ~. c~ ~~ '~ ~p y Y~l, ~ l,~N ~'~~ GPiV7 ,~y ~s ~~S ~ ~ ~~ L~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk JANICE GASS, Troasuror BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY BOWERS, Flrs Chief BILL GORDON, Police Chlet GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer MEMORANDUM HUB OFTREASURE VALLEY ~,~~ r/~~ A Good Place to Live CITY OF .MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (206) 888-4433 FAX (208) 887-4813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERT GIESLER MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE ch.lm+a" Zonlnq a Plsmm~0 JIM JOHNSON Centennial Cooroinuor PAT8Y FEDRIaI May 6, 1993 TO: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL, CANNING 8 ZONING FROM: GARY D. SMITH, P. E. , f~„,,:.,n,, ,. ~. RE : LOUNSBURY LAN1= ~ ' ~ I ANNE X AT I D~ ~ Z Ol+~~.NG PR~L IM1 NARY :..PLAT ) 4A 'dam ~ : 4b, ' ~ ~ ~~ I have reviewe~~ this ~rum~`` a "°a11"~`o.r the< following comments for your info>rsaiation fandor ons:`aderati~on as conditions of the applicant dur~~ng yourr;iec~sia makan~ process: ~ ,.w`- 1. Lounsbury par^ct?l~ is ct~a.lguo.us t•a Mc~ord parcel which is contiguo~t9s to'" the previous "y .annexed' Waterbury Park tPeterso~lt:) parcel. d~ ~~, ~~?. ~, ~ ~ ;.m ~. The chorx~,, dista~f~ of°••~#-•e ~wf~ag°"~ lotaSrv must be 40 feet, minimum. ~"~~ ~~ `'~ 3. Lots and Blo~cits~neec~., to be numbered.r f~ f ~,:~ ~:, ',~, r 4. Show street names. "°' ~ .,~ ~„ .. ~«~a.,.,:: ~,t..,~,~2q ,..: ~ , W .~.. 5. A variance request is required fo><^ the length of culdesac shown. The maximum culdesac length, from center of intersecting street to center of culdesac, is 450 feet. b. Nothing is shown on the submittal regarding proposed sanitary sewer^, domestic water, drainage and/or irrigation ditches, fire hydrants and street lights. These items need to be addressed. Sanitary sewer access is a problem as a route needs to be established westerly out of this property land not down a lot line), across adjacent propel^ty not in ownership of either Lounsbury or McCord and under the South Slough. The sewer set^vice question has been discussed with the applicant in only a very genet^al way. This needs to be resolved. • • 7. Who will be responsible for maintenance of any storm drainage facilities? 8. The right of way width shown in .the notes is 40 feet. Should this be 50 feet as shown on the drawing? 9. The applicant has proposed a landscaped parkway to help soften the straight line of the main road. I have talked with Wayne Forrey with my concern of higher than normal vehicle speeds on this roadway alignment. Wayne suggested positioning several landscaped islands on roadway centerline with adjacent "eye-brows" in the curb and gutter to help slow the vehicular traffic. • - :ssttstt.........i iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii i`i`^e^;isiifisisiiiiii~ ~i1~t~~11J1~~i~iJ ~~~~ ~~~~ e~ ~ M O $e~ ' itlttftittttttsss~ ~ L t~t ~C w ~~~ 1 ~ :tttttt:......... • ~ A =.t ............. aeifitts~~siuttsi 49lt l ~ t4 4 = ' ; ~ R ~4 t 4 4=t $ i ~ ttssstttttttsast~4 i~lattt~t:neat i t.tt:ttftfttttt.! ....ttttt..:tt..=~ ~ ~ „O rn (j .....s...t.s.t..t e~ttusntsausYsl ~ :.essstttttts:s.: ~iantesnn::ef~ iiiiiiiiiiuiiiis ~ ~ r ! =ee edeiiiiiii~i`i`isisi`i`i i ii:ii~iJt i i ~' ' ~ ' ~ _ i l J l ~ I N J tY'!'~! YNL ~ l tIlTlY41 ' ' ~ Q 1 2 O A 1 )' p r ~ C r ~ ~ i c ~~ w ' ~ `~ 7 ~ ~~ • n m ~ ~ ~~ a ~ ~ r .,~ n L ~ ,~~ ~aD i ~ ~ 3E Z ~m .~ ~ ~ -r- ~ ' ~~ ~~~~ ' ~~i < ~ ` ~ ~~f ~ ' S ~~ d~` ~ ~ ~ ~ ' • December 5, 1994 Meridian City Council City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Greenhaven Estates Dear Meridian City Council, SEC 1 3 194 CITY 0f MF~RIDIAI~ We have received the certified notice for the proposed Greenhaven Estates Subdivision and would like to commend the developer on his proposed densities. 'However, in order to establish continuity with our neighboring properties and the aesthetic quality that has already been established for our particular area of Meridian, we respectfully request that the following restrictions be made prior to approval of this project: 1) That the entrance of Greenhaven Estates be designed and reviewed by the City prior to acceptance and that it be required to be more than the cedar fencing that you see in most subdivision entrances. The ~ttrance to a neighborhood is what most people will see for years to come and thus sets the impression for the neighborhood and helps influence the future atmosphere of the City. A quality entrance reflects a quality neighborhood and a quality City. Thus, we suggest an entrance designed with either brick, stone, or extensive landscaping. The total estimated cost of such an entrance, based on Lansbury Lane, is approximately $200.00 a lot. This amount is minuscule based on the longevity of such an investments' effectiveness. 2) That "islands" be required in the street to slow traffic on the straight road as it was in Lansbury Lane (see Exhibit A). It has been suggested that speed bumps be used to slow traffic in Greenhaven, common sense says that speed bumps will only force Greenhaven residences to use Lansbury Lane for ingress/egress in order to avoid the bumps. We recommend speed bumps on the side road between Lansbury Lane and Greenhaven Estates and islands on their main road to slow their traffic, thus accomplishing th® task of slowing cars while evening out traffic between the two neighborhoods. The total estimated cost per island, based on Lansbury Lane, is approximately $100.00 a lot. Again, the amount of this investment is minuscule. 3) We understand that the minimum square footage in an R-4 zone is 1,400 sq ft. We also know that in certain circumstances that the City has required a greater minimum than that set by the ordinance. Based on the following facts, we feel that this project warrants similar consideration, and thus request that a reasonable minimum of 1,600 sq. ft. of living space be required in Greenhaven. Greenhaven is situated between Lansbury Lane which is averaging 2,000 sq. ft. homes (based on 19 homes and a required minimum of 1,700 sq. ft.) and the Sweet properties which • • have 2,650 sq. ft. and 2,200 sq. ft. homes on 5 acre lots. Gary Lee, the engineer for Greenhaven, communicated to Sherri Stiles that the economics involved in the larger lots would dictate larger homes. The developer however, told us that he was building in Greenhaven the same type homes he built in Elk Run only on larger lots and that economically it was feasible because he was both developer and builder. We do not feel that allowing 1,400 sq ft houses built between projects with homes of 2,000 to 2,650 square feet is good long term planning for the City of Meridian not to mention the economic injustices placed on our properties. It is difficult for us to imagine driving down Meridian Road and having an Elk Run sandwiched between Lansbury Lane and the Sweet properties. It is with this image in mind that we appreciate your consideration of our concerns regarding the Greenhaven Estates application. Sincerely, ~' 6419 ~~t~+~ 133 ~ C ~~~-~ ~ ~ yr~~ ~I,~~~S" 1~i1 ~~ ~ ~..~i ~~ ~-~-~ t~~~' ~ 1 Z~ ~U ~~~.~ /~-~xt1 ~ i~ ~sl ~i~'Qi '~ ~~~t,(, Z~L Vii/ C~ ~~ ~,~~,~~~ ~ ~z i~/ c~i2~ ice, i-~.~-~w'1~~=' Vl~`c/'-l~ 5~`C~~ ~-1 Lr~iS ~~Jl,~-~1M5 ` (.a,~~ tiYf~. ~2 iri1. ~~ ;~~,~ ~~7 `f2S GV ~ ice!'-~'~- *~r OFFICIALS WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, Clty Clerk JANICE GABS. Troaaurer BRUCE D. STUART, Watsr Works Supt. WAYNEG. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water supt. KENNY BOWERS, Flro Chief BILLGOROON, PolfceChist GARY SMITH, P.E„ City Enpinsar MEMORANDUM • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY Y ~~r/-1 1~ A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208)888.4433 FAX (208) 88711813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERT GIt:SLER MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT 0. CORRIE Chslrman zoning 6 Pianninq JIM JOHNSON CaMannial CoOrdlnator PATSY FEDRI221 May 6, 1993 TD: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL, CANNING R ZDNING FROM: GARY D. SMITH, P. E. , RE : LOUNSBURY L~E''~. Y ~~ ~ ~ t ANNEXAT I.Di~t ., ZDI~l,,NG, PREL I MI NAF?Y~•-,,,PLAT ) ~, .~,,: ~ ... r~ a ~ ~, ^4 k,~'~'6 N' a. I have reviewed this 9uir~°' a alrc~'°°`o`iar the ;following comments for your infor~lsation "wand or on~iderati~n as Conditions of the applicant duri~lg you» ec~sio m~kin~ pt^~ocess. ~ 4 / s ~`' B is "~. r ':. pe ~ ~~ .. 1. Lounsbur~t ~parRc~l~~.~s 'cnnt~." us t;ap Igbrd parcel which is cont i guo~us t o'1~ ~~hae °prec„v:~ru~l'y Y'annexed ~ ' Waterbury Park tPetersot't,) parcel. e` ,. 2. The chorrd, di staa~lr+ flf~ •e'~~t~ €~l ag? ~ 1 ot~~5 must be 40 feet, minimum. ~,`~ •~ 3. Lots and Hl oct.Ks~' need.. t o be numbered. ,~ ~ .„ ""~ ~q.i ;r 4. Show street name^5.,,.,e"° -~ r~r::,~. t .., ...._ 5. A variance request is required for the length of culdesac shown. The saximum culdesac length, from center of intersecting street to center of culdesac, is 450 feet. b. Nothing is shown on the sub®ittal regarding proposed sanitary sewer^, domestic water, drainage and/or irrigation ditches, fire hydrants and street lights. These items need to be addressed. Sanitary sewer access is a problem as a route needs to be established westerly out of this property land not down a lot line), across adjacent propel^ty not in ownership of either Lounsbury or McCord and under the South Slough. The sewet^ service question has been discussed with the applicant in only a vet^y gene?^al way. This needs to be resolved. r •, • • 7. Who will be responsible for saintenance of any storm drainage facilities? 8. The right of way width shown in the notes is 40 feet. Should this be 50 feet as shown on the drawing? 9. The applicant has proposed a landscaped parkway to help soften the straight line of the main road. I have talked with Wayne Forney with ~y concern of higher than normal vehicle speeds on this roadway alignment. Wayne suggested positioning several landscaped islands on roadway centerline with adjacent "eye-brows" in the curb and gutter to help slow the vehicular traffic. r ~~ • • tt i 1 :sssasss........-~ it~gsanestttttt isiiii tttissi i i i i ~ ^^ ~ ~~ ~~ S~~~I~iiJi~ilJiii :..=..=s.........I estssssesssssssss • iiiiiiiiisiiiiiiit ' 94tt~ti4~4i!!4t!t' ~ i ttssstsetsetssa~jj essaessessatsstsi ~ saua;~esezss.t i ~ .s...=....s=..s.=~ .; ,..........t.s... st~etsssttassuts! =.itilfttffsi!!.i ~ ~tsautenus:a i iitttttflttt~~t L i ' e ^ ^e ' i2~i:ii:4ii1i1~~~ ' 1 . i • w ~ .~ ~ ~ . ; wp ~z~~ g~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ A n fl ~v rn Y N :. ~r :O ~; ~ ~ C .., ,; ~ . Z ~, ~ ~ . ~~ ;~: ` ~ TT W~ ~ N ~ ~ r~~ . ~ ="r ~=D ~Z ~m ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ sj ~~ .. M't• ~. ON.~ 3 fy V~3 P~C ~~ y~ s ~~ 3 ~ ~ • MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: NOVEMBER 9.1994 APPLICANT: THE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 6 REQUEST: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR __ _ GREENHAVEN ESTATES AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: COMMENTS FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: ~a ad boo ° s~ ~,~c ~`~~ ~ti~ OTHER: • • ~ BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION HOMAN AND THE DEVELOPMENT GROUP GREENHAVEN ESTATES ANNEXATION AND ZONING PORTION OF THE N 1/2 NE 1/4 SE, SECTION 1, T.3N., R.lE MERIDIAN, IDAHO FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for consideration on October 11, 1994, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the Council having heard and taken oral and written testimony and the Applicant not appearing but through Gary Lee, Professional Engineer, and having duly considered the matter, the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of public hearing on the annexation and zoning was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for October 11, 1994, the first publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; that the matter was duly considered at the October 11, 1994, hearing; that .the public was given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were available to newspaper, radio and television stations; 2. That the property included in the application for annexation and zoning is described in the application, and by this GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 1 • • reference is incorporated herein; that the property is approximately 14.88 acres in size; it is on the west side of Meridian Road between Cherry Lane Road and Ustick Road; that it is adjacent to Lansbury Subdivision; Strasser Farm Subdivision lies to the north. 3. That the property is presently zoned by the county RT (Rural Transition) and the proposed use would be for R-4 Residential type development. 4. The general area surrounding the property is used agriculturally and residentially. 5. That the property is adjacent and abutting to the present City limits. 6. The Applicant is not the owner of record of the property, but he has submitted the consent of the titled owners, John W. and Candy J. Homan and Donald F. and Rae Jean Homan. 7. That the property included in the annexation and zoning application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 8. That the parcel of ground is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 9. That the Application requests that the parcel be annexed and zoned R-4 Residential; that the present use of the property is for two residences and for limited agriculture; that the applicant indicated that the intended development of the property is for R-4 Residential development with houses containing a minimum of 1,400 square feet; that the Applicant has submitted a preliminary plat. GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 2 • 10. That Gary Lee stated at the hearing that the density would be 2.7 dwellings units per acre, that there would be a 20 foot landscaped buffer along Meridian Road, that the lots would be approximately 13,000 square feet, that the R-4 requirements would be met, the streets would meet ACHD requirements, that they would request a variance on the cul-de-sac length, that the Onweiler ditch would be used for pressurized irrigation, that the road medium would be landscaped, that the homes would be from 1,400 to 1,800 square feet, and that the City Engineer's comments would be met. 11. It is also stated in the Application that Onweiler canal and other irrigation ditches would be tiled to continue delivery of irrigation water and that other smaller irrigation and drainage ditches that deliver water to this property only would be abandoned; that pressurized irrigation would be constructed to each lot and a pumping station tentatively planned to be located at the northeast corner of the development, which irrigation system would be operated by Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District; that access to the sewer line for purposes of maintenance, is still being worked out with the owner of the property, Mr. Bob Flaten and the developer of Lansbury Lane Subdivision, Mr. Cris Williams. 12. There were property owners in the immediate area that testified objecting to the annexation and zoning of the parcel: a. Rich and Gloria Fern testified that their concerns have to do with the traffic constantly being in front of their property once the development is finished with the flow coming in and out of the complex; that the Ada County Highway District and Shari Stiles have commented there GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 3 • are an estimated 400 vehicle trips per day that will take place; that vehicle lights will be hitting directly onto their duplex and as the vehicles turn the lights will be crossing their entire residence; that street lighting won't be offensive if proposed; that a concern over their tenants backing out of their residences onto Greenhaven Estates Street; that adequate dumpsters be made available at the construction site to care for blowing debris and that the developer put sound walls and landscape barriers to curtail some of the noise and lessen the visual impact of headlights to preserve privacy. b. Dan Sweet testified regarding the size of the house the developer plans for this development; that the property north of this proposed development has houses in the 2600 square foot range; that when the zoning starts to go down to R-4 the size and price of the homes in the area diminish; that the Commission stick with not real expensive developments and little so so developments; that he too, is concerned about the increase of traffic. c. That John Sanford testified that his 7 1/2 acres east of Vendable Lane, which is a private, deeded lane, is landlocked; that he needs access; that he was told Vendable Lane would be made a through street when the Waterbury Park No. 5 was being developed; that the engineers for Waterbury Park No. 5 development, Brian Smith, Hubble Engineering, told him they were going to make a stipulation to cross the slough onto Mr. Sanford's property so he would have access into Waterbury No. 5; that now Mr. Smith says this is not true, that they did away with that; that kids are already coming from Lansbury Subdivision chasing his horses which are across the ditch; that Vendable Lane needs to be a public street; that the Ada County Highway District said they figured he would never want access for reasons of development because of the large arena he has for cutting horses; that Mr. Sanford never received notice of Waterbury 5 Subdivision being finally approved and that they are not going to go across the canal like Mr. Sanford was earlier told. d. That Joe Simunich testified as to the irrigation and the Onweiler Lateral; that on the plat for Lansbury Subdivision the covenants say no irrigation water will be provided to the lots; that now this developer is scheduling pressurized irrigation; that those established in the area are not likely to give up their water rights; that for years there has been a rotation on that lateral; that the question arises as to how the developer plans to water all these proposed lots on a 12 hour rotation when GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 4 • • water only comes 12 hours out of every 8 days; that when these subdivisions come up, we in the area get a product or ditch or something that is unsatisfactory like fences built right on top of the irrigation line causing people not to have access to their head gates. e. Chris Williams testified that he liked the density; that he desire restriction of an entrance which included a brick wall, islands in the roadway, that the frontage setbacks be alternated, that the homes should be a minimum of 1,600 square feet. 13. That the property is in an area marked on the Generalized Land Use Map of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as a single family residential area; that in the Comprehensive Plan property inside the Urban Service Planning Area may be developed at greater densities than one dwelling unit per acre. 14. That in the Rural Area section of the Comprehensive Plan, Land Use, Rural Areas, Section 6.3, it does state that land in agricultural activity should so remain in agricultural activity until urban services can be provided. 15. That Meridian has, and is, experiencing a population increase; that there are pressures on land previously used for agricultural uses to be developed into residential subdivision lots. 16. That the property can be physically serviced with City water and sewer if the Applicant extends the lines. 17. Meridian Police Department, Meridian Fire Department, Meridian City Engineer, Meridian School District, the Central District Health Department, Ada County Highway District, Ada County Street Name Committee, Idaho Power, U. S. West and Nampa Meridian Irrigation District did submit comments and such are incorporated GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 5 • herein as if set forth in full. That the Meridian Planning Director did submit comments among which were that a 20 foot minimum landscape strip is required along Meridian Road outside of the proposed right-of-way, all ditches are to be tiled and approval obtained of Nampa-Meridian Irrigation District obtained prior to applying for building permits, that landscaped islands should be placed on the roadway centerline, that a variance was needed for the length of the cul-de-sac, that the property to the south has a minimum house size of 1,700 square feet, that perimeter fencing is to be installed, and a development agreement is required as a condition of annexation; that the City Engineer commented that the legal description needs to be resubmitted pursuant to Resolution 158, that the seasonal high ground water elevation needs to be determined and a profile of the sub-surface soil conditions was needed, that the irrigation ditches crossing the parcel need to be tiled, that a master street drainage plan needed to be submitted, and that the fire hydrant placement needed to be coordinated with the Water Works Department. 18. It is particularly noted that the Ada County Highway District in its site specific requirements, stated that the stub street shown running to the north should run to the west. 19. That the R-4, Residential District is described in the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 3 as follows: (R_41 Low Density Residential District: Only Single Family Dwellings shall be permitted and no conditional uses shall be permitted except for Planned Residential Development and public schools. The purpose of the (R-4) District is to permit the establishment of low density single-family GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 6 • • dwellings, and to delineate those areas where predominately residential development has, or is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, and to protect the integrity of residential areas by prohibiting the intrusion of incompatible non-residential uses. The (R-4) District allows for a maximum of four ( 4 ) dwelling units per acre and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian. that the R-4 zoning district requires a minimum of 1,400 square feet to be included in houses in that zone; that the Applicant's representative stated that the subdivision applied for would comply with the R-4 requirements. 20. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Residential Policies, 2.1U states as follows: "Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural, single-family, multi-family, town houses, apartments, condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities." 21. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Rural Areas, 6.3 c., it states as follows: "Within the Urban Service Planning Area development may occur in densities as low as 3 dwellings per acre if physical connection is made to existing City of Meridian water and sewer service and the property is platted and subdivided . .' 22. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use, Rural Areas, 6.4, it states as follows: "Residential development is allowed in the rural area provided that said. development does not exceed the Rural Residential Agricultural density, unless it is inside the Urban Service Planning Area and City sewer and water is provided, then Low, Medium and High density residential may be considered. All residential development must also comply with the other appropriate sections of this plan." 23. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Housing, Housing Policies, at page 66, it states as follows: GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 7 • • "1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile homes, multi-family, town houses arrangements), ." "1.3 An open housing market for all persons, regardless of race, sex, age, religion or ethnic background." "1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping centers should be encouraged." 24. That there is a population influx into the City of Meridian at the present time which has been going on for some time and is likely to continue; that the land is relatively close to Meridian and economic conditions are making it difficult to continue farming in the area. 25. That in 1992 the Idaho State Legislature passed amendments to the Local Planning Act, which in 67-6513 Idaho Code, relating to subdivision ordinances, states as follows: "Each such ordinance may provide for mitigation of the effects of subdivision development on the ability of political subdivisions of the state, including school districts, to deliver services without compromising quality of service delivery to current residents or imposing substantial additional costs upon current residents to accommodate the subdivision."; that the City of Meridian is concerned with the increase in population that is occurring and with its impact on the City being able to provide fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services to its current residents and to those moving into the City; the City is also concerned that the increase in population is burdening the schools of the Meridian School District which provide school service to current and future residents of the City; that the City knows that the increase in GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 8 • • population does not sufficiently increase the tax base to offset the cost of providing fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer, parks and recreation services; and the City knows that the increase in population does not provide sufficient tax base to provide for school services to current and future students. 26. That pursuant to the instruction, guidance, and direction of the Idaho State Legislature, the City may impose either a development fee or a transfer fee on residential property, which, if possible, would be retroactive and apply to all residential lots in the City because of the imperilment to the health, welfare, and safety of the citizens of the City of Meridian. 27. That Section 11-9-605 C states as follows: "Right-of-way for pedestrian walkways in the middle of long blocks may be required where necessary to obtain convenient pedestrian circulation to schools, parks or shopping areas; the pedestrian easement shall be at least ten feet (10') wide." 28. That Section 11-9-605 G 1. states as follows: "Planting strips shall be required to be placed next to incompatible features such as highways, railroads, commercial or industrial uses to screen the view from residential properties. Such screening shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') wide, and shall not be a part of the normal street right of way or utility easement." 29. That Section 11-9-605 H 2. states as follows: "Existing natural features which add value to residential development and enhance the attractiveness of the community (such as trees, watercourses, historic spots and similar irreplaceable amenities) shall be preserved in the design of the subdivision;" 30. That Section 11-9-605 K states as follows: "The extent and location of lands designed for linear open space corridors should be determined by natural features and, GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 9 • to lesser extent, by man-made features such as utility easements, transportation rights of way or water rights of way. Landscaping, screening or lineal open space corridors may be required for the protection of residential properties from adjacent arterial streets, waterways, railroad rights of way or other features. As improved areas (landscaped), semi- improved areas (a landscaped pathway only), or unimproved areas (left in a natural state), linear open space corridors serve: 1. To preserve openness; 2. To interconnect park and open space systems within rights of way for trails, walkways, bicycle ways; 3. To play a major role in conserving area scenic and natural value, especially waterways, drainages and natural habitat; 4. To buffer more intensive adjacent urban land uses; 5. To enhance local identification within the area due to the internal linkages; and 6. To link residential neighborhoods, park areas and recreation facilities." 31. That Section 11-9-605 L states as follows: Bicycle and pedestrian pathways shall be encouraged within new developments as part of the public right of way or as separate easements so that an alternate transportation system (which is distinct and separate from the automobile) can be provided throughout the City Urban Service Planning Area. The Commission and Council shall consider the Bicycle-Pedestrian Design Manual for Ada County (as prepared by Ada County Highway District) when reviewing bicycle and pedestrian pathway provisions within developments. 32. That proper notice was given as required by law and all procedures before the Commission were given and followed. CONCLUSIONS 1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been met; including the mailing of notice to owners of property GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 10 • • within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's property. 2. That the City of Meridian has authority to annex land pursuant to 50-222, Idaho Code, and Section 11-2-417 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that exercise of the City's annexation authority is a Legislative function. 3. That the CITY COUNCIL has judged this annexation and zoning application under Section 50-222, Idaho Code, Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Meridian City Ordinances, the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the record submitted to it and things of which it can take judicial notice. 4. That all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have been complied with. 5. That the Commission may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and State. 6. That the land within the proposed annexation is contiguous to the present City limits of the City of Meridian, and the annexation would not be a shoestring annexation. 7. That the annexation application has been initiated by the Applicant, The Development Group, and the annexation is not upon the initiation of the City of Meridian, but is at the request of the Applicant. 8. That since the annexation and zoning of land is a legislative function, the City has authority to place conditions GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 11 • • upon the annexation of land. Burt vs. The City of Idaho Falls, 105 Idaho 65, 665 P.D 1075 (1983). 9. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular Section 11-9-616 which pertains to development time schedules and requirements, 11-9-605 M, Piping of Ditches, and Section 11-9-606 B 14., which pertains to pressurized irrigation; that the Applicant will be required to connect to Meridian water and sewer; that the development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development Ordinance; that, as a condition of annexation the Applicant shall be required to enter into a development agreement as authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall address the inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C, G., H 2, R, L and prior comments of the previous Planning Director, Wayne Forrey, relating to the lack of adequate recreation facilities and that land set aside for a future park would be desirable, that the City is in need of land set-asides for future public service use; that the development agreement shall, as a condition of annexation, require that the Applicant, or if required, any assigns, heirs, executors or personal representatives, pay, when required, any development fee or transfer fee adopted by the City; that there shall be no annexation until the requirements of this paragraph are met or, if necessary, the property shall be subject to de- annexation and loss of City services, if the requirements of this paragraph are not met. GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 12 • • 10. That proper and adequate access to the property is available and will have to be maintained; that it is concluded that as a condition of annexation, access to the property now owned by John Sanford shall be provided; that the access shall be sufficient to meet Ada County Highway District street requirements. 11. That since the Applicant's property is in an area marked as a single family residential area, the annexation and zoning Application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and does not conflict with the Rural Areas policies; but the land does border rural farms or ranches and those farms and ranches shall be buffered and the subdivision covenants shall let the home owners in the proposed subdivision know that the farms and ranches are there and that agricultural uses will, or may, be continued; that this matter shall be addressed in the development agreement. 12. Therefore, based on the Application, the testimony and evidence, the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian it is ultimately concluded that Applicant's property should be annexed and zoned R-4; that the conditions should be those stated above; that such annexation would be orderly development and reasonable if the conditions are met; that the property shall be subject to de-annexation if the requirements of these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are not met. 13. That all ditches, canals, and waterways required to be tiled by City Ordinance shall be tiled as a condition of annexation and if not so tiled the property shall be subject to de-annexation. 14. With .compliance of the conditions contained herein, the GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 13 annexation and zoning of R-4, Residential would be in the best interest of the City of Meridian. 15. That if the conditions of approval are not met the property shall be subject to de-annexation. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONER HEPPER COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE COMMISSIONER SHEARER COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) VOTED ~l VOTED `` VOTED ~Ll VOTED 9'~ VOTED RECONQRENDATION -~ The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the Meridian City Council that the property be annexed and zoned R-4 Residential with the conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and that the Applicant and owners be specifically required to the all ditches, canals and waterways, and install a pressurized irrigation system, as conditions of annexation, and that the Applicant meet all of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian, specifically including the development time requirements and enter into the required development agreement, and that if the conditions are not met that the property be de- annexed. MOTION: GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 14 • APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: GREENHAVEN ESTATES FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Page 15 • • MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: OCTOBER 11 1994 APPLICANT: THE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 11 REQUEST: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ~REENHAVEN SUBDIVISION AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS FORTHCOMING COMMENTS FORTHCOMING SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS ' ~1 ~ r SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS, SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS OTHER: ~~~,/ GLENN J. RHODES, President SrERRY R, HUBER, ~5ce President DAMES E. BRUCE, Secretary TO: ACHD Commission • DATE: FROM: SUBJECT: Development Services INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE GRENHAVN/DSTECH 10-5-94 September 29, 1994 PRELIMINARY PLAT - GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIVISION Meridian - Preliminary Plat; Annexation/Zoning (Developer - The Development Co., 1903 S. Gull Cove Place, Meridian, ID 83642) (Engineer/Surveyor - J-U-B Engineers, inc., Gary Lee, P.E./L.S., 250 S. Beechwood Ave., Suite 201, Boise, ID 83709) PRELIMINARY REPORT - NOT FINAL UNTIL APPROVED BY THE ACHD COMMISSION FACTS & FINDINGS• 1. Greenhaven Estates is a 14.8-acre, 40-lot single family resi- dential subdivision located on the west side of Meridian ap- proximately 900-feet south of Ustick. There are 1,940-feet of new public streets planned. This application includes Meridian annexation and zoning from RT to R-4. 2. GENERAL INFORMATION: LEAD AGENCY - Meridian ACRES - 14.8 FEET OF NEW PUBLIC STREETS - 1,940 LOTS - 40 PRESENT ZONING - RT PROPOSED ZONING - R-4 ESTIMATED VEHICLE TRIPS PER DAY - 400 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE - 263 L.F. OF FRONTAGE ON Meridian Road - 377-feet MOST RECENT TRAFFIC COUNTS - N/A FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP DESIGNATION - Minor Arterial ADA COUNTY RIDGE-TO-RIVERS PATHWAY PLAN - Lane EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY - 60-feet REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY - 90-feet; 45-feet from centerline Meridian Road is fully improved with 44-feet of paving and 5-foot sidewalks. ada county i7ig~way district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 PRELIMINARY PLAT ~REENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIV~ON September 29, 199 Page 2 IMPACT FEE BENEFIT ZONE - West Ada IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - Western Cities 3. The parcel currently contains two single family dwellings located on the east end. 4. This application is proposing a stub street to connect with Lansbury Lane subdivision to the south (29-foot back-to-back street section in 40-feet of right-of-way) and a stub street for future interneighborhood connection to the north (37-foot back-to-back street section in 50-feet of right-of-way). Staff recommends the stub street to the north be realigned to the west. 5. The preliminary plat indicates the drainage area in the north- west corner of the parcel is to be owned by ACRD. Staff recom- mends the drainage area be platted as a separate lot, owned and maintained by the homeowners association. 6. This application is scheduled for public hearing by the Meridi- an Planning & Zoning Commission on October 11, 1994. SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: 1. Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Meridi- an Road abutting parcel (15 additional feet). The owner will be compensated for this additional right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone. 2. Dedicate a 15' x 15' triangle (or appropriate curve) of right- of-way at the north and south corners of Meridian Road and the proposed Hardt Street abutting parcel to keep the street im- provements in the public right-of-way. 3. Direct lot or parcel access to Meridian Road is prohibited, in compliance with District policy. Lot access restrictions shall be stated on the final plat. 4. Replace unused curb cuts on Meridian Road with standard curb, gutter and sidewalk. 5. Utility street cuts in the new pavement on Meridian Road will not be allowed unless approved by the District Commission. 6. Realign the proposed stub street to the north, to the west. 7. The drainage area in the northwest corner of the parcel shall be platted as a separate lot, owned and maintained by the homeowners association. PRELIMINARY PLAT GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIV~ON September 29, 19 Page 3 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS: 1. Street and drainage improvements required in the public right- of-way shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and policies. 2. Dedicated streets and drainage systems shall be designed and constructed in conformance with District standards and poli- cies. 3. Specifications, land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans, design information and calculations presented to ACRD shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with Idaho Code, Section 54-1215. 4. Provide written approval from the appropriate irriga- tion/drainage district authorizing storm runor'f into their system. 5. Locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigation and drain- age appurtenances, etc.) outside of the proposed street im- provements. Authorization for relocations shall be obtained from the appropriate entity. 6. Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across par- cel. 7. Submit three sets of street construction plans to the District for review and appropriate action. 8. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and appropriate action by ACHD. The proposed drainage system shall conform to the requirements of Meridian and shall retain all storm water on-site. Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the public right-of-way or in a common lot owned by a homeowners association set aside specifically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes, sheds, or other valuable ameni- ties placed in said lot. Drainage lots and their use restric- tions shall be noted on the plat. 9. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for review and appropriate action by ACHD. 10. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side lot property lines when the driveways are not being shared with the adjacent property. PRELIMINARY PLAT GREENHAVEN ESTATES SUBDIV ION September 29, 19~ Page 4 11. Developer shall provide the District with a copy of the record- ed plat prior to the installation of street name signs. Street signs will not be ordered until all fees have been paid and a copy of the recorded plat has been provided to ACHI? staff. The copy of the recorded plat shall show the recording information as inscribed by the Deputy County Recorder. 12. Install a stop sign on every unsignalized approach of a project street to an intersection involving a collector or arterial as the cross-street. The stop sign shall be in- stalled when the project street is first accessible to the motoring public. 13. Aright-of-way permit must be obtained from ACRD for .all street and utility construction within the public right-of- way. Contact Construction Services at 345-7667 (with zoning file number) for details. 14. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any require- ment or policy outlined herein shall be made, in writing, to the Manager of Engineering Services within 15 calendar days of the original Commission action. The request shall include a statement explaining why such a requirement would result in substantial hardship or inequity. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. STAFF SUBMITTING: DATE OF COMMISSION APPROVAL: Larry Sale ^ . I - ~~% i !'-" I ate.. ZNJ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~W~~~~.-~~ ~~ZZ ~'' ~ a°~xx00 vvsZo(/z^~ QQ mmmm~~O,O.~ZW U Q oo 1-SZDO~~Z d~ ~~ ~~~a~~~~ o~~~~~ gad~~aa ?~ ~iitn~~ ~~~~oo~~~~~~oo~~~~ V DOO ~ ^~®Q ®~'~®~b~r ®SYe '~` ~ Ill ---I .. iir I r I N t0 O '~ a i J _~ ~ ~~~-I I ~~ I I~ I I I J I -~ I I ~ ~ to a a° ~ ~ °y~~ m~ r- V1 ~J~ 8&~ o o~ a° o a g > ~ t,J O U ~ ao~~ ~mitn`'a ~ ~~~ ~ ~~a ~d~ ~~_ ~ ~ S°-Q~O~~c~°~oo >o~ QrQO~,z~~ (yQ,~ ~ W W Oy~py Q om7 O rO JfnMQ' x'560' VIN I u I I j° " ~ ~ ' U I . ~ I I e I I U I I° (~ I I ~ -' 1 I -.. I I ~ - ~i I I ~I - I - ~ ~ - ---r------~ I- I I I _~ _ ~ - ~ - ~ - i I ~ ~ -I- - - 1- - - 1 - ~ -. II--- - 1, - I '~ l.~ =__ _I ~==I_____ ~ ~ =_I I ~ //~~ ly ~ _ 1' I I ~~' I I ~ ~ ~= -I71 ~~ - - - - - - f I i '~ I ~ I ~I I I I I I I s I~ ~. ~~ .I ~` ---_; ~. i _~' ~ .. 13 I~ $3@l~~~d~1 ~l~li _ _ - _ I i~s° ia3° ~~~=i<: ~?L3i7a E :is=3.~3= v 0 0 M ~v~ C fi ~ ~f ~ ' ~ %% .~' li ~ f ii I ~ 6 I Q ~~ I~ I~ I~ I aroy Nviair~w •N :P ~S }Y}A :Y d~ ~a ~ e -~_ -~ ~.. -~ @} T- Y6 ~a ~ U W N~ F W~ tc 6 ~ ~ p !~ ~ 8 ~ < U_ ' i . A t y~ ~ I :,~ tp~ sR Yp ~A ~ ~ iY g g ~ ~- e p: ^ ppyy 6] ~-- Y6 ~~ F U .,~ NI _ =~ ~ ~ W ~I I ~'' ~~ W ~ e N Q t . ='~ deg _ Z t, ,l a t g~l~ as s~ t~ j i ~~ i a • 5 f i ) t J z ~s ~lit~~z±~ ~~ a# ~~ II¢ ~ ¢ <~ .f sa ~~ ~j3~i tip `~~~~ R ~. !~ Y6A _ _ ;~ _= ~ s' 3: 3 C w r fy P i e Y Y ¢¢ 2 e g s e ~ ` zi ~ 31 r 1 [si qq t s'iy 1#e =~ ~' ~ ~ ~; ~~~ ~2 a a l~~ a + ~ a ~ t:j o ~s s z i - ~ ~ ~3y ~~~ ~' ~ 0 1~ a ~ ~ Tf -I m j~~~ ~ ~i ,~ ids i~~ ?1 ~~;~ ~ ~~ ~~ !tS 3af 3i ~ e~ jdjj ,~ ,~ ~~~:~ ~~ 4, Y~~Jya ~~i i# ~~ ~~~}si ~~ tE~~ ~' ~ i~! 7 t ~ ~i~`tj j~ ~~s ~~~ I • • RECEI~~~' SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET SEP 2 9 1394 CITY OF MERIDIAN Proposed Development Name GREENHAVEN ESTATES City MERIDIAN Date Reviewed 9/22/94 Preliminary Stage XXXXX Final Engineer/Developer J-U-B Engrs Inc /The Development Company The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Boise City Street Name Ordinance. The following existing street names shall appear on the plat as: "N. MERIDIAN ROAD" "N. WEST 3RD AVENUE" -- - -- - uD r .. .. - The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in or for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTE E Y R . RE NT TIVES OR DESIGNEES ~ Z Ada County Engineer John Priester Date Ada Planning Assoc. Terri Rayno Date 9 1 J Meridian Fire District Representative ~ ~ ~ ti Date NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed !!!! Sub Index ___ Street Index n NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS HARDT E ~ VICINITY MAP ~ . 36 --- - - ~ __ :, ----- ; -- - T- - --- - i -2 ~ Sit 14 1~~4 PROPOSED NOMAN ANNEXATION & a ' ~ X01'. GRENHWVEN ES TES SUBD. r~ - ~~~e. MS ., - ~ ER S~ ~ P SS ~i \,~ . ~ . ~ a~~~J ~L~.~~ ~ :1:1:1:1:1 ~ 1 3 ~. _ _ _ T~ _-s_r_______ .. ~ 1'~ =300'- • • e ~ s s 3 i z I i ~3 I Iz n; ~~~ I~~ - 6 4 3! .r ~~~8 ~ ~~ ~ _ o 'rV CLAIRE ~~ ! 1 ~^ ~~~~ ~ J ,:~ ~' LAfVSB Y LA E; i ~.~; ~ i ~~ ~2 3 14 ~ _ + .t i '7 !B IZ S .2 li r~ ! 9 9 ~ ~ ~ 6 S ~ 4 J '~ • • . _ • 'b - • • ~ ' • /! %~ ' ~ • ~--- - f72.5 - ~ 2 12: 9 ,.9 !~6 !5 K 13 ;~33 !! y 10 9 8 7 F S 4 S 2 ona I ~ 24 \ w. w00D8URr R. I'~ W. WOODBURY OR. t ~! ! ~ ti 12 II 10'9 8 7 6 S 't2 I! 10 9 ~ 7 ,6 S ,p I 4 3 T --~ s ~,p I U S 1 i V S2 I I 2 O ,S ~~' ~ W EkBURY 23 -, .~ ~ W ~ E1~RY PARK 0. I ~ y~ 6 " I7 le ~9 20 a 22 24 _ 30 ~ ~ ' ~ 26 2 24 23 ~ ~ 20 19 t8 ,I I7 16 !S 14 I 13 L ~ ! ~ I ~ - - yy YIA?ERBURY DR W 'AMA?ER9URY WY ~ ! ~ I ~ t • 6 S 4 ' 7 ~ 24 .~ 23 ~ 2! ~ 2J 18 i6 17 16 ~ IS ~_ 7 I ~; ~ t ,~ 12 tl 10 9 B 7 6 S le S I i ~ ~ 0~5, I B i z 6 4 3 2~ t 12 II /10 9 i •~ 6! 3~ 4 . i iz N .8 ~ i. M (~: ! - ERt 24 w. CHRISFIE~D DR f ~D~'~e gNpp ,,~-~-~1-~- \ ~ _ x ~ .. ~~RC~ ~:i\ iii RI ~. ~T R~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 37 all of the testimony. (Discussion Inaudible) Johnson: You have the floor whatever you want. Rountree: (Inaudible) (End of Tape) C_~ Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I move that we have findings of fact and conclusions of law prepared by the City Attorney. Shearer: Second Johnson: Moved and seconded that we have the City Attorney prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law on this application, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Johnson: We will now have a 10 minute break please. TEN MINUTE RECESS Johnson: If we can call the meeting back to order please. ITEM #11: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR GREENHAVEN ESTATES BY THE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY: Johnson: I will now open the public hearing, if there is a representative for Greenhaven Estates would you please come forward. Gary Lee, 250 S. Beechwood, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Lee: This application before you is a request for annexation to R-4 zoning with a preliminary plat known as Greenhaven Estates. It is situated on North Meridian, a 1/4 south of Ustick, north of an existing subdivision called Lansbury Lane. This development will consist of 40 single family dwelling lots on about 14.88 acres resulting in a density of 2.7 lots per acre which is considerable less than the R-4 request. The minimum building lot size is as it is shown on the preliminary plat is about 80 by 164 foot in depth or 13,000 • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 38 square feet roughly. The structures in this development will comply with the R-4 zoning requirements of the City of Meridian zoning ordinance. There will be a 20 foot wide landscape common buffer along Meridian Road adjacent to the lots. There will be a landscaped drainage lot in the northwest comer for storm water management which will also act as a pedestrian access to neighboring properties. There will be a homeowners association formed to maintain the open spaces. Access to the development is via Meridian road and also Northwest 3rd Avenue going into Lansbury Lane. All the streets within the development will be built to Ada County Highway District Standards, there will be a variance request for the culdesac length on the westerly side of the development. It measures about 520 feet, the zoning ordinances allows 450 foot culdesac. Sewer and water into the development will be extensions of neighboring existing city services. There is an irrigation ditch along the easterly boundary and paralleling North Meridian Road tha# will be tiled. Pressure irrigation system will be installed in accordance with the Nampa Meridian standards. All the lots within the development will include landscaping and will be fenced by the developer who is also the builder on this particular project. In response to some of the agency comments, Nampa Meridian Irrigation District indicated some concerns about the Onweiler Lateral. That particular lateral is shown on their mapping systems to end at about the right of way line of Meridian Road. There is a pair of head gates there at the end of the Onweiler Lateral and that will be accommodated in our irrigation system. Some of the comments by the Planning Director Shari Stiles, we are comfortable with her comments, the one about the landscape median in Lansbury Lane to slow traffic, we met with Ada County Highway District on this preliminary plat design and they suggested the use of speed control bumps on that long stretch of roadway in the east west direction. The minimum building size in the R-4 zoning ordinance is 1400 square feet, this development will comply with that ordinance. The developer has indicated that the houses will range anywhere from 1400 to 1800 square feet in size. I reviewed Gary Smith's and Bruce Freckleton's comments, we are okay with what they have had to say and most of those items will be addressed in the final design portion of the project. If you have any questions I would be glad to entertain those. Johnson: Thanks Gary, any questions of Mr. Lee? Rountree: Gary, have you talked to Gary Smith about his comments and could you elaborate a little bit on his comment 13? Lee: I haven't spoken with Gary about them, I have reviewed the comments. Let me see if I can find his list here, about the sanitary sewer. We did discuss that at the concept meeting about a continuation of the sewer system. And I did discuss it with the design engineer on Lansbury Lane. I am not sure what he is alluding to here, but we did review the depth of the sewer to accommodate that property. It appears from the initial point that it will, there are some other things about the sewer that I don't know about. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 39 Johnson: The Commissioner would like you to address that Gary please? Smith: Mr. Chairman, at this time there is a trench dug across the access road on the property to the south and west of Lansbury Lane Subdivision. We don't have access to the sewer line and that is what the comment alludes that was made in my review. That is my understanding that was being resolved but at this point we don't have access to that sewer line for maintenance purposes. Lee: That is south and west of Lansbury Subdivision? Smith: Yes, it is on the Bob Flaten property and that is a piece of property that the sewer line crosses that serves Lansbury Lane subdivision and will also serve this proposed subdivision. It has been a while since we had a meeting or had any discussion with our City Attorney concerning the status of that. It was my understanding it had been worked out to where the ditch that Mr. Flaten dug will be filled in and that Mr. Williams the developer of Lansbury Lane is going to do some work on the road itself and some other clean up work that Mr. Flaten had requested. So I believe it is being worked out, correct me if I am wrong Wayne but I think that is being taken care of. (Inaudible) Johnson: Any other questions of Mr. Lee? Gary, the variance that would be necessary because of the length of the culdesac, the City Council has been pretty adamant about granting variances only in cases of hardship. What would be your response to that? Lee: I guess the hardship was created when Lansbury Lane was subdivided and the way it was. In that particular subdivision culdesac exceeded the minimum length as well and by virtue of their stub street we had to connect at that point and the shape of this property is narrow in deed, which doesn't give the owner of this property an opportunity to be real creative with a street system. A possible solution would be to extend a stub street to the west property line so that when that property line develops to the west it would eliminate any culdesac at all. Hepper: Could the stub street to the north be located in a different spot so that they don't' line up with the one to the south? Lee: We considered that as well and discussed that with the Highway District and Shari Stiles. The problem that we create there is the block length between that stub street and Meridian Road. Right now it is at the maximum thousand feet so there could be a variance either on block length to move that stub street west or a variance on the culdesac, but that is a good solution. I think that is what I would do if I had an opportunity. • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 40 Hepper: Are there any other alternatives available besides just a straight shot? Lee: Well, there could be some meandering street through there, but the problem you create is lots of shallower depth and lots that are very deep. Right now they are very deep at 164 feet on each side. If you start meandering that street you get real deep lots in an excess of 200 feet which we don't believe is a desirable situation. Hepper: Or islands possible? Lee: Islands are a possible solution to help control traffic. Hepper: I am not so concerned about the traffic as the Aesthetics of it, the streets, just dead straight for I don't know how long it is. (Inaudible). Johnson: Thanks Gary, this is a public hearing anyone else like to address this? Rich Fern and Gloria Fern, 2790 North Meridian Road, was sworn by the City Attorney. G. Fern: We have some development concerns, when the development is finished we live directly across the street from the development which on your vicinity map had an R across the street. So, where the street is going to come out that is where our duplex is. Our residence sits directly next door to the duplex. The development concerns are when it is finished is that the traffic slowing in front of the house and the complex to turn in and out of the street that there will be cars constantly in front of our property. In talking with Shari Stiles and the highway district there are 400 estimated vehicle trips per day that will take place. Where the cars that will be coming out of Greenhaven Estates, the lights will be hitting directly onto our duplex and actually when .they are turning the lights will be hitting into our residence. R. Fern: The lights wilt cross the entire structure. G. Fern: We are also concerned about street lighting so that it won't be offensive, if they proposing street lighting across the street where it will be shining directly into our windows also. Also, our tenants driveway backs out directly into the street, the Greenhaven Estates Street and we are concerned about that, that it will be dangerous for our tenant to be backing out into the middle of that street right of way. Building concerns, we are concerned that the debris from the construction site blowing over into the property that adequate dumpsters will be there to take care of that situation. Also that maybe they will have the street swept during, maybe once a week to pick up all the dirt. We are concerned mainly about how it is going to affect our tenants, that street where they will be exiting out of the subdivision is right where our duplex is. We are concerned about that confusion • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 41 going on. Some of our proposals are that maybe they can possibly move the street access to line up with our pasture. We have 290 feet across our pasture and if they can configure the street where they move it more north where it is not going to impact the duplex directly it would be better for us. We are also proposing that they put in sound walls and landscape barriers to curtail some of the noise and lessen the visual impact of headlights directly into the house and the duplex so that we can have our privacy preserved. R. Fern: That is pretty much it, as you mentioned that is a very long street and for someone living at the end of that street coming down the street with say a 4 by 4 aimed at the duplex would be quite something to experience in the middle of winter when everything is real dark. As Gloria said we do have a pasture that is north of the duplex, the pasture probably starts 15 or 20 feet north of that with all the 290 feet of frontage. I now John's property also has more space to the north of it. It is to the north of where the road is proposed, I don't' know how much. We are hoping that perhaps that could be changed somehow and some way. G. Fern: Another situation that we have going on is that our house and duplex are very close to the street, so if we have the impact of these 400 estimated vehicle trips per day going on it is almost right onto our property there with all of this interaction going on all day long with these vehicles. R. Fern: A couple of years ago North Meridian Road was widened and the amount of traffic on that street now has increased to say the least. I can only assume that it will get a lot more and I am envisioning at certain times of the day and evening where cars are going to have to slow and pull into that center turning lane and wait in front of the duplex to turn. That is not a good thought, it is like a constant flow of cars in front of our house. It is fairly negative I would say. G. Fern: Our house is right next door to the duplex, so whatever impacts the duplex is also going to our impact our residence where we live, so we are very concerned about that. Thank you. Johnson: Thank you, is there anyone else that would like to come forward on this application? Dan Sweet, 2975 North Meridian Road, was sworn by the City Attorney. Sweet: Thank you for letting me speak, I am not opposed to development in Meridian, I think it is healthy in some cases. I did speak earlier to the developer and my biggest concern would be the size of the houses that he is going to put on there. I think if you folks could remember the development next to his on the south Lansbury Lane has houses • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 42 that are in the 1800 square foot size range. When we start to go down to an R-4 and houses are going to be around the $100,000 price range I guess that is a big concern that we would have since our house on the north would be in the 2600 square foot range. I am very concerned about the Comprehensive Plan that we are developing here and that we stick with not real expensive developments and little so so developments. I had some of the same concerns about traffic and obviously we know stuff is going to develop. I did bring a preliminary plan of the property that would be north of that property. This would be Meridian Road, (inaudible) 3.2 houses per acre. We are looking at 2600 and 2200 square foot houses. I would just appreciate some consideration there and you folks looking at his plan (inaudible). Johnson: How many acres do you have there? Sweet: There are 2 5 acre parcels which is 10, that was Strausser Subdivision. Johnson: And the total number of lots? Sweet: 23 lots, thank you. Johnson: Thank you, any questions? I saw another hand. John Sanford, 2880 Vendable Lane, was sworn by the City Attorney. Sanford: I have lived on Vendable Lane some 24 years now. I have attended a number of these zoning meetings and apparently I am not getting anywhere. I own 20 acres, these 20 acres are in 2 separate parcels, 7 112 acres are east of Vendable Lane and I have 12 1/2 acres west of Vendable Lane. My property abuts the end of this subdivision. My cow pin is right here where I train cutting horses, about 40 feet from the end of that culdesac. The first meeting I attended was when Lansbury subdivision was being developed and indicated there was a culdesac. I asked him to plot that out because I need access. The reason I need access is because Vendable Lane is a private lane and it is deeded. They told me at the time that Vendable Lane was going to be a through street, it is obvious due to Waterbury Subdivision No. 5 that it is already not a through street. And all intent and purposes my 7 1/2 acres which is east of Vendable Lane is landlocked. 1 checked with an engineer from, I think the name was Brian Smith from Hubble Engineering regarding Waterbury Park No. 5 because the last meeting I attended here they indicated they were going to make some sort of stipulation to cross the slough into my property so I would have access into Waterbury No. 5. He tells my, Mr. Smith tells me this is not true, they did away with that. So in essence I am definitely landlocked on this 7 1/2 acres. Number 1 I was told Vendable Lane would be a through street, I was told by 2 people at that time the City Engineer. I am a loss and I am disturbed, I am disturbed because it looks like you have • i Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 43 got me painted into a corner. I have already got kids coming from this Lansbury Subdivision chasing my horses which are right across the ditch. I am not in favor of any subdivision any more. But I am really not in favor of one when I am landlocked. I don't know what else to tell you but I think I have a problem and I think you are the only people that can solve it. Hepper: Your solution to the problem is to extend the street through to the property line, is that correct? Sanford: Number 1 I think you need to abut that out, I tried to get them to abut it out on the Lansbury thing and he wouldn't do it. Now you are going to abut it out probably 50 to 60 feet south of my property line. So it isn't going to be down the center of my property. My property lays the same way as these 2 pieces do into Vendable Lane, 12 1/2 acres. I have a big horse arena there, I train cutting horses. Hepper: That would be if the street alignment was perfectly straight that would Sanford: Go right in between my cow pins. Hepper: It wouldn't line up with your Sanford: It would go right through my arena. Hepper: But it would only be a little ways from your property line? Sanford: About 30 to 40 feet. Hepper: Which for purposes of future development that wouldn't do you (inaudible). Sanford: I have to get somewhere somehow, I can't fly in there. Hepper: So if they provide access to the southern edge their property that would give you (inaudible). Sanford: You have encountered another problem, they are already talking about this. big long street here and this speed deal. When I, when someone tears by building down and they develop it (inaudible) then you have a big long street to contend with. Vendable Lane needs to be a public street, that would take care of my problem on the 7 1 /2 acres for the most part and my 12 1 /2 acres. Hepper: Have you talked to Ada County Highway Department about that? • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 44 Sanford: Yes, he was at the last meeting here and said due to my elaborate facility, he never thought I would want to have access for reasons of development, because it is a pretty large arena. But I don't think it was Ada County Highway District's position or even their place to make judgement on my facility whether I wanted access or not. The other alternative, I don't know, I have never received notice of Waterbury 5 subdivision being finally approved other than talking to this one engineer that says they are not going to go across the canal like they told you. Johnson: Do you have anything else, that is what we are here for to gather this testimony so someone can get back with you and hopefully. Sanford: Can I have someone's word that they will get back with me, because I never heard about Waterbury No. 5 until I contacted this engineer. Johnson: I can't speak for the City but they get copies of all our minutes. If this does progress which it normally does. Sanford: Is there anyway t can legally stop this whole thing until I find out. I am not going to get land locked it is illegal. Johnson: My personal suggestion would be to talk to one of the City fathers. Sanford: I have talked to 2 of them. Johnson: Have you talked to the Mayor. Sanford: Yes, I talked to him when all of this started Johnson: Have you talked to him since the promise wasn't' kept and you thought (inaudible) and what was the response you got on that? Sanford: Well, that was at the Waterbury No. 5 meeting, 1 didn't get an answer. Johnson: So you still don't have an answer. Sanford: Not unless you give me one. Johnson: I don't have any answers either, I don't' want you to tear down your arena and I sure as hell don't' want you flying in there. We will work on getting you an answer we will do that. Anyone else? • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 45 Joe Simunich, 955 West Ustick Road, was sworn by the City Attorney. Simunich: First of all I would like to bring one point forward and I think in our area of development there, the Vendable property, the Peterson property, the Lansbury property and now this property that the Homan property, it looks like each one of these developers looks at each one of these properties to his own benefit and not for the entire area. So I think Ada County Highway District, the City Council and Planning and Zoning, as these people come in for these rezones to divide this property should take a look at the entire area. Not only the property lines, but also for instance Vendable Lane is a private lane and there are some ditches in there. Before these plots are approved I think somebody should look at the entire area rather than just each individual 14 acre piece, a 10 acre piece or a 12 acre piece. That is enough on that. Now let's go to the irrigation and the Onweiler Lateral. That has been a headache for a long time and Gary Smith is aware of it, the Mayor is aware of it and numerous other people are. Now I understand this developer is scheduling pressurized irrigation. On Lansbury Subdivision on the plat on the covenants it says no irrigation water will be provided to the lots. The engineer now I hear him say there is going to be pressurized irrigation. On the Onweiler Lateral, it has probably been there for 60 or 70 years, we have a rotation on that lateral. I would approximate that the whole property has water for about 12 hours every 8 days. How are they going to have these people just draw water 12 hours out of every days and water all of their lawns. Can they change their rotation, can they do something else. This rotation has been established and we don't like to give up our water rights. Some people buy property because they imgation during the day time, in the old days if you had to get water at night your property didn't bring near as much money. So, we still have 60 acres here and at the present time we have no intent of disposing of it. It seemed like each time one of these subdivisions come up I have to come in here and talk to you people, talk to the Council, but then furthermore we get a product or ditch or something that is unsatisfactory. Fences built right on top of the irrigation line. Other people haven't got access to their head gates, so these things need to be addressed and possibly while the engineer is here I would like to ask how he is going to water all these lots on a 12 hour rotation when he only gets water 12 hours out of every 8 days. Thank you. Johnson: Thanks Joe, is there anyone else? Chris Williams, 4185 South Linder, was sworn by the City Attorney. Williams: I am a pretty strong advocate on property rights and people being able to do what they want to do with their property. I did appreciate the density on this subdivision that they had proposed. I am here representing the homeowners and builders in Lansbury, being the developer on Lansbury I wanted to read this letter. • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 46 Johnson: Are you with the homeowners association? Williams: I am the president. We received a certified notice for the proposed Greenhaven Estates subdivision and would like to commend the developer on his proposed densities. However, in order to establish continuity with our neighboring properties and the aesthetic quality that has already been established for a particular area of Meridian we respectfully request that the following restrictions be recommended to the City Council prior to the approval of this project. The first is, that the developer design the entrance and that it be reviewed by the City. On the property to the south, on Lansbury Lane I know from developing that to establish something a little bit nicer on that 350 foot stretch which isn't' a large stretch isn't a major expense. It ended up being and I think I have a really nice entrance that is above the norm, I think it cost me a total of less than 3% of my total development cost. It wasn't a major expense to create a nice atmosphere for the neighborhood, everybody sees when they drive by Meridian Road. They see the brick wall, in 10 years the brick wall is not going to be deteriorated like a cedar fence would. Landscaping, extensive landscaping something in brick or stone. We just want something next to us that isn't' going to adversely affect us and that is what the people are going to see. The second thing is that we would request that islands be proposed and required in this neighborhood for the slowing of the traffic as it was in Lansbury Lane. I submitted that letter to the Commission on that, that the requirement that was made by my or the suggestion that was made on Lansbury Lane when I developed that. I feel that speed bumps on the straight street will only cause deflection of traffic through Lansbury Lane. Lansbury Lane the cross street is already a restricted right of way as it is. It was designed, the street was designed to restrict traffic from going through there on the basis that in the Comprehensive Plan at that time, I am not sure if it is still in the new Comprehensive Plan but Vendable Lane was designated as a collector for the center of that section. And I am not sure if that is still in effect in your Comprehensive Plan or not. But when I did go through the approval process of Lansbury it was. The linear streets, I know that they talked about this on the long stretch on Packard Subdivision. The street is, property is 1710 feet long, it is over a 1/4 mile. What we have done and this is just a suggestion, we alternated setbacks. We have 25, 30 and 35 foot setbacks, they are a little bit larger but we are doing a little bit larger homes. I am going to go ahead and read this third request. We understand the minimum square footage in an R-4 zone is 1400 square feet, we also know that in certain circumstances and the circumstances I think Hunts Bluff is an example, I think Cougar Creek is an example, there were several examples that Shari Stiles gave me this morning that under certain circumstances the City has required a greater minimum than the minimum square footage set by the ordinance. Based on the following facts we feel that this project warrants similar consideration and thus request that a reasonable minimum of 1600 square feet of living space be required in Greenhaven. Greenhaven is between Lansbury Lane which is averaging 2000 square foot homes and that is based on 19 homes that are built and are in the process of being built. And that is • • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 47 the minimum, we are requiring a minimum in Lansbury of 1700 square feet in a single story and 1800 square feet in a 2 story, but our average is 2000 square feet and we are requesting 1600. The Sweet property on the north, their 5 acre lots and their 2 homes consisting of 2650 feet and 2200 feet on 5 acre lots. Shari Stiles had communicated to me that Gary Lee the engineer on the project had said that the economics involved with larger lots would dictate larger homes. But after discussing this with the developer on the project he plans on building they said 1400 to 1800 square foot homes. At the time we talked to him he said 1350 to 1600. And that it was economically feasible because he was the developer and the builder. We don't feel that allowing 1400 square foot homes built between projects with homes of 2000 square feet and 2650 square feet is good long term planning for the City of Meridian, not to mention the economic injustices placed on our property. We are talking a distance between the edge of my lots and my homes to the edge of where the Sweet's property is we are talking 370 feet. There is not a large width there that we are dealing with between the 2 properties. Dan has 11 lots that border his property from Greenhaven so he has the potential of eleven 1400 square foot homes next to his 2650 square foot home. I've got 21 lots that border this project and I am averaging 2000 square feet. Economically the people that invested in my project look across their fence at a 1400 square foot home, 30% smaller, 30% less value it is going to negatively affect their values without a question. That is basically my main concerns. To address the issue with the sewer, we are working on it, at this point in time I have spoken with the Mayor, I am having the trench put back in, the overflow is being removed. It is just a matter of getting my contractor out there, he is cranking out roads right now for subdivisions before fall. But I think I will get him out here at the end of next week or two and get that cleaned up. Johnson: Any questions of Mr. Williams? Thank you, anyone else? Joe Simunich: Can the engineer explain to me how he is going to do his irrigation water/ Johnson: On your time but not on ours, you can have a meeting with him and give him an opportunity to address that, but I do not want to do that here. We are not in the answering business right now. We are gathering information. Anyone else? I will close the public hearing. What would you like to do? Shearer: I move we have the attorney prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law for this project. Rountree: Second Johnson: We have a motion and a second to have the City Attorney prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law for this application, all those in favor? Opposed? Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission October 11, 1994 Page 48 MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #12: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR REZONE BY DIANE AND ROBERT LANG: Johnson: I am going to be stepping down on this item because of a potential conflict and let Charlie Rountree handle it. (Chairman Johnson steps down and Commissioner Charlie Rountree takes his place) Rountree: Is there someone here for the applicant, I will open the hearing. Roen Wilson, 1567 Leslie Way, was sworn by the City Attorney. Wilson: It just says here this will be an antique store, it will be an antique and collectible store. Diane Lang has been involved in this business for some time and she does a first class operation. It would really be a great addition to the area. This property is adjacent to the alley directly across from the post office. ACHD recommended or suggested that the alley be paved as far back as this piece of property goes. That is fine, however we are finding out that it is a little difficult to get an engineer to come right out there right away to address the requirements and we are running into the winter. We would just like to ask that a little time be allowed to get the paving done in case we have a big freeze and they can't do it in the middle of winter. Are there any questions? Rountree: No questions here, you might want to come back if some do come up. Anybody in attendance want to address this? Seeing none I will close the hearing. Hepper: Mr. Chairman, I move we have the City Attorney prepare findings of fact. Shearer: Second Rountree: It has been moved and seconded to have findings of fact and conclusions of law prepared, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea (Chairman Johnson returns to his seat) ITEM #13: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR TACO BELL RESTAURANT BY JONATHAN GIBBS: Johnson: I will now open the public hearing, is there a representative from the applicant