The URL can be used to link to this page

Glenn, Robert AZ` • HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY OFFICIALS A GOOd PIaC2 CO L1V2 COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk MAX YERRINGTON v CITY OF MERIDIAN RGBERT D. CORRIE eer GARY D. SM THS P.EyC ty Eng WALT W. MORROW BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. 33 EAST IDAHO SHARI STILES JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste water supt. - Planner & Zoning Administrator KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief IDAHO $3642 MERIDIAN W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief , JIM JOHNSON WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887-4813 Chairman ~ Planning & Zoning Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission, may we have your answer by: April 5. 1994 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/14/94 HEARING DATE: 4/12/94 REQUEST: Annexation/ zoning for Robert Glenn BY: Robert Glenn and Tealey's Land Surveyincl LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: North side of Cherry Lane between Sunburst subdivsions and Sunnybrook Farms subdivision JIM JOHNSON, P/Z MOE ALIDJANI, P/Z JIM SHEARER, P/Z CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z TIM HEPPER, P/Z GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR RONALD TOLSMA, C/C BOB CORRIE, C/C WALT MORROW, C/C MAX YERRINGTON, C/C WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CITY PLANNER MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT MERIDIAN POST OFFICE(PRELIM 8~ FINAL PLAT) ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT IDAHO POWER CO.(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) U.S. WEST(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION(PRELIM & FINAL PLAT) CITY FILES OTHER: YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: +~'tista-.re~~as n ~~~;~~ 2 1 ~~~~ C~ ~~" M~x~~~t:~~ • • ~~~~~~~~ APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION APPROVAL & MA9 ~ ~ 1994 ZONING OR REZONE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~.~'~"~ ~~' ~i~hlt~ltll`~ FILING INFORMATION I. GENERAL INFORMATION (PROPOSED NAME OF SUBDMSION) North side of Cherry Lane between Sunburst Subdivisions and. Sunnybrook Farms Subdivisions (GENERAL LOCATION) SW'/a Section 2. T. 3N.. R. 1 W, and see attached (LEGAL DESCRIPTION -ATTACH IF LENGTHY) Joan B. Priest (OWNER(S) OF RECORD) (NAME) (TELEPHONE NO.) 19833 Middleton Rd Caldwell. Id 83605 (ADDRESS) Robert Glenn 376-3325 (APPLICANT) (NAME) (TELEPHONE NO.) 2604 N. Cole Rd Boise Id (ADDRESS) Tealey's Land Surveying 385-0636 (ENGINEER, SURVEYOR OR PLANNER) (NAME) (TELEPHONE NO.) 109 S. 4th St Boise Id (ADDRESS) (JURISDICTION(S) REQUIRING APPROVAL Residential (TYPE OF SUBDIVISION -RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL) 25.12 ACRES OF LAND IN CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP. ___ __ (ACCEPTED BY:) (FEE) T~-LEY'S LAND SURVEYING March ~ 9, 1994 Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meridian City Hall 33 E Idaho Meridian Id 83642 RE: Application for Annexation with Concurrent Rezone Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: RECEIVED MAR 1 1 199 CITY ,OF~ p~y~~Yi?i1~N This is an application by Robert Glenn seeking annexation with a concurrent zone change for approximately twenty-five (25) acres located on the north side of Cherry Lane in Section 2 of Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian. We are asking that this parcel be annexed into the city of Meridian with a zoning designation of R-4. This parcel lies between the Sunburst Subdivisions and the Sunnybrook Farm Subdivisions. Bath of these developments are within the corporate limits of the city. of Meridian. Parcels lying north and west of this; site have also been annexed into the city limits. Our parcel has become an enclave, nearly surrounding by lands which have been annexed. The site is undeveloped agricultural land. It is bounded on the south by Cherry Lane, on the west by Sunburst Subdivisions, on the east by Sunnybrook Farms Subdivisions, on the north and northwest by Tuthill Estates and Kentfield Manor subdivisions. Tuthill Estates and Kentfield Manor are being constructed at this time. South of the site, across Cherry Lane, is the Haven Cove Subdivisions. The area surrounding the site is either developing or is already developed with residential uses. The Meridian Comprehensive Plan .designates this site as Existing Urban development. Development of this site will be in compliance with the provisions of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and of the Meridian Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. Although the development plan is not being submitted with this annexation request, it is our intention to subdivide the parcel for single-family residential development. We are seeking .the R-4 zoning designation as part of this request. This zoning designation, the accompanying development standards, and our desire to provide a quality residential development will ensure that this parcel be developed in an manner whicli will be compatible with the existing and proposed development of the area.. Municipal services (sewer, watts, , 109 South 4~' St~ .Boise, Idaho 83702 (208) 385-0636 Fax (208). 385-0696 s. c~cneny i~ sue Project 1313 public streets, schools) exist in the area immediately adjacent to the site. Sewer and water services will be extended into the site. Because of the size and shape of the parcel, we are taking care with the design of the subdivision proposal. We have had pre-application meetings with Meridian City staff and with Ada County Highway District staff in an effort to address some of the issues surrounding development in this area of Meridian. In summary, we are seeking annexation of twenty-five acres into the city of Meridian. We are asking that, when annexed, the parcel be given a zoning designation of R-4. Although the subdivision proposal is not accompanying this annexation request, a subdivision application will be submitted in the very near future. Our proposal is consistent with the goals and policies of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with existing and proposed development of the area. Annexation of this parcel will eliminate a potential enclave of land which is not under the jurisdiction of the comprehensive plan and development ordinances of the city of Meridian. We are, therefore, respectfully submitting this application for annexation and requesting approval of this matter. Respectfully, Patrick A. Tealey Tealey's Land Surveying By: i-~e ~~~~~~~~~ Ted Hutchinson B. Glenn/Cherry Lane Site Project 1313 ....~,. ' • $O6 • F.L.B. No 1447Z~8-7 ._.._ ' R~_AtF 4FM The uode~aed, TBe F.daeal Lad Brk et ~okar. a aaa~ooatioa. ~•ab aaalifiaa Wt tia aeet~ ~~,Octobsr 11th l~..n~-.aaaergdl~ = °ri==' d M Mast wi 1et aad IwsbaM s# TB* l~adarri Lar> Bank of S~oic+oa. a ooepooatio~. awi saoo~iad i Hook... ~a ...~... a[ lfo~r. at ~~ ~az~ ,,aoa,iaa iw bars ~ Co~aty. Idab ~' . WM~ai wits tia iakt t>twa14 aaerwi, is drib laid ari iaararari. 7 ~ ~fpNY said eoep,eaA;oa l~,a.~ai Ira...o a ba ai~ai h.ralo ..~ its ooe~oeala ` ~'i~ ~'~ aad to >» attisoad tb ~ iy- d -». ~•..~ ' , ,• ~f'. ~ .r a l~Ai, LAND BANH OF ~~. .., F L1; , :~as~. ArAioeaai /ldwt ..~ v. t~tB;TYtiI~~ANit. . ~ ` as ~ ~'~ t Z • a~~~~ ~~ I:-. . ~- •alaaa aa. Bwaea~r a~arai oa alo llrrw-'da M o~ alriai aHwt a[ tia 0o4ar~Aioa t~aR avaaalai /M !nMh~ A!~+ Eiaiai~a- ~3oF~RMiosaisai~gatRriioiataiiga$~rti~1,~, I {Ma!o~'tirt (~ artli.da+ oo w.aail~raii i~Wo•R. awi tWt lr..ad ~~ tip ~ +~: .~ ~~; . 'W a~iartiaad gwdd wt lio ~4 ~i ~aodrtaiow we~.., _ ~ . .~11~ ~+,: ,. ~w }. ~`_ 7,1 +'~ ~ ~` ~ ~~~~ w J 6 '- I AMail~ ~! litl F, ~~ ata~i CMraye+~r .: ~ ^ ~ DaorMaat Na..,.......Y.....,r«~...~.....»....... Ha wWai~wrt was dlai darja~oeari ~ tlra boa at er OaooA ~' iar at ~.D.1! at.«=-. at ..~L.....•lhot r.d ..~ ~. at w ~x s ~ r; , y=, w» ...,a, ~a...... ~..,...,. ~a~i raoaa~ai `Hoak .......... a<llaal~a M wa ........... o Ciia .............~.. Dawv. ltaaaaiai w 1! .._.... _._. ~, ~~ ~U t~'L•'U~KAL LAND BANK ,MORTGAGE Fcs ~.a LOAN ~_ 24;725 R~mnda ri':~ t~` :11.I. ~i!•:~ Hti"1'HNSI:' Pi!tfSEN75, That un this •11th--day at odotk_ „~ .......re..i~.Z_.._~_, 19_.._21 _ ~---- Jc4r, D. Priest and Thomas W. Priest, wife and husband. A~dIMr Opt ar waca~ir iQtt riOtNt~I, biAO, tiL. . ~~~ Da;~ i1- y" %~ hereinafter called the Mortgagors, hereby grant, bargain, sell, convey end nwrtgage to THE 1:EDERAL LAND BANK OF SPOKANE, a corporation in Spokane, Wash- ington, hereinafter called the Mortgagee, she following described real estate in the Cuunty of Ada _-- -, orate of T~Q CIARENCE A. Pt„gtvrtN6 °,,,~'"ORDER , ...- / - ~f ,~Yu1~:r..:.=. ~,.. .., c .. J ~ Township 3 North, Range I west, Boise l~feridian. ;section 2: Beginning, at the Southttest Corner o. the ~2,~ cf Section 2, which point is the real point o_° det,~ ::.- ing; thence North 0°55' ltiest 26;9.7 feet elc::t; the Western boundary of said c'~S'kw of said ;;ectiau tc a point on the Northern boundary or' said 3N~ c:' :;~::- tion 2; thence North 89°39' :hst 41.73 .'ee;. ;:1c:.4 said Northern boundary to a .point; ttenc~ ~c:.ti: G`>' Bast 2662.2 feet aloztg a line pa:all~:l tii Jc:.'.,: t.LS;.~rz. boundary of said E};,'aF,, of said ~ectior. 2 Lo :: ix.:i::;, :.:: the Southern boundary of said f;2~Wr o: sa;a ,;~ct:c:, _; thence wc:stc~rly ;14.73 .ect eloz,~, st.id „c;.ti:~:: .c;~::.:- ary of said ~~. or sai~ ;;e;cticr. ~ to t::~ ri:a .. beginning. rf.Cli'T the ;;Darr, 25 :'art thereof' f`1HF,'-~'?- i y94 1 b ~ 14 TEHLE'r" 'c• SURI ~E`r I fJG F' • ~? • • AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST STATE OF IDAHO ) COUNTY OF ADA ) p _ ~ ~_ T (city) (} . 1. That I am the record owner of the property descn'bed on the attached, and grant my permission to: Ro4FrZT LFNt~ N a60`~ N- COLE RD. ~ (game} (address) ~ o I s E ~ ~ 0 ~ ~? 370 `~ 1 EflL.Ey S LAnlo Su2~E~(IN?r to submit the accompanying application pertaining to that property. 2. I agree to indemnify, defend and hold Meridian City and it's employees harmless from any claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements contained herein or as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application. ~}, Dated this ~ ~~ ~ day of - /~ ~' ~ ~'C , 19 %u~ ~; (signature) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. ~~ ~'Y7 ~~~ ' Notary Public for daho Residing at: ~~~ ~~~~ My Commission Expires: 3 - ~ - ~ y 0 0 • • ,..„_ ~ia~.~ F.L.B. No 1~472~8-7 .~.... E OF MORhG~GE The uadeuitard. Tb Fadad Land Book of 9yoir+r. a eoepasatioa. iaaa6a- oaatitias tisat tisa ~oet~ dard.......October 11th .,19 T azacv~Dad b7- `~ D. PMest and Thonss M. Priest wife and M~aad to T5a Frdaral Lrd Back of Spokanr. a cocpoadiaa. cad aaooidad is Book... ~ ..--..-. o[ Yae~aa. at 7:8 ' 787309 Ada Ixint ins>sumaat No. . aaooada a[ ~~. Idaho ~ to~oRlwr with tir daht thaaeb aaoutad. is flrliP Paid cad diaohaepd. IN TESITD[ONY WEI~OF. acid oo<postioe has,oa~ad its aaDa to ba sipd iaaw and ~ aoepoeaoe anal to ba a[tiud tha 22nd dalr of ~r ~'~ ~~ .~.1: ~ ~ "" . • ~... r ~~-+. s r~ ..: , FSD6RAL LAND BANK OF SlOK1WE STATEOF WASEIQIGTON. j ""'~''`+~.'.. aDUNPY OF SPORANtd. Oe tLis ~n_.~ d __.._. dq,ot Spril { :.~ f~~_ . A*et 18.8..7.._.._..., Dataer aaa paeaoaalb app~d 0o ace keowr fro ba a• a~thoaiad spat of tin f7oepoatlioat that rsae+eoad tin wieii~ -ds amo~w- ladpd tie aid hwtttimt~t to ba the f'~aa aed soWotte7 net awd isad of »id pe~otttio9.,at;~, ~ l~sa,d ~ (s)be was a~ioeimad to smaeua acid ~aat. cad ~ ~ snl stBa~'jt !p~ a1D~!°!`. WITNESS aq iced ad aoeadsl aaai the dq and raas Lat aeaiw w~..: _ -, • ~ `;_ =. ~ •~ . . -.~;.,,2.~; . ~~. STATE ~' s~~ Doaeast N0. .........».....» ................. I iaeaiQ ~ that tha within ~aatimaet was dad floe:goad b ehr attic at tin ~ o[atid ~ oa tha w das ~ -~• x-18 ~..=.• a -"~~"'"o ~ebck aei ..~ ainoi,~t.. at tin ~ at ~ troatdad 5 Hook .......... of lbetiyaa ae Pap ..-........ ~ ......_....'~~ ~TIOf~ ........ ~ .. Ds~ ~Os 19 ..___. lYl to Rr0°~~ « ~~~~' By .....................»...................... D.puty. ._ ~U.~ ~ .a - ;;•:.i~f:~~.~i. LAND RANK 1~1ORTGAGE ~ ~~ _ Lc)AN - ~-- - i Recwdrd -- ,,.:. } ------- ---- Pt.g° - -- 4 - ---_ _ _ _ A~rluor, Geri w ite..~aer --- ~~ ~ 11NC~ut?,:I vi ... ... _ ~..ot c::; ~iC.:a i .i. i%rlr.o' ~, N:. _ fi. t1L'sSfiZ}r,:. Tire "~: • 7d. ~~;2 ~ - -' i r, w- _: 1 .:: i~ hrnvnafrer called the Murtgagors, hereby grant, hargaut, xll, worry and tnurtgage ~ .~ - w "I'tit: rEDERAt. LAND liAtil; Of• SF'v}:A`rl`, a c~,rpurauun in Jpol,ane, VJa.h- j 'r~ T=------ tngum, hereinafter called the Mortgagee, she Fulluw•ing dr~.n:4d real estate in ;hr ' _ ~ ~~ . ; C.uunt} of __-_____- naa --- ._ ---3tate of __.__.:-_:= Tcr~:~ - - ~-' ~- t-- - To~aahi; 3 iicr.,:., :..:r.~;C 1 ,.~st, $Oi::@ '.At::l.:i&Il. ~.ac~icr. <; 3e~::.I:irt; at the .~c~t::a~;.~t ';~r:.<:: ,,. .,.._ _~ " ~. >eciior. ~, ~~i:ich ~~oini is tL.. ^~ c.l t_~..:. „_ _ .._-.-.- ir.~;; the:.ce tJorir 0°F5' .:es;. _o: ,. . ~e;. ~;~. _. ~~~sicri: .,crr..:ary u;' sai:. .:~ -- s~~.= .._...: .. _ ... point o. ;.re t:ort%:err: :;o~.::.::~:;; .._ .,__.. -. , . ~- ~ior. 2; Lcer.ce tic. ti. 39`>' .:u.:~ .,....." . ~. .__. - .:aic tic: tne: r. co..r:csr;,, ,.., a _;ei:..; ..._..~ - .'. . _.. :..:$v Gt.JCIr.G .~". :. aiil:rl~ c. _1:.. ~ ....... .. _-r _ _ .... _.. .. .. .. ~. j J~ J4 il. ..~. .i. ..4.-. ..- -v.. ._ .. .... ... ,~1~ .u._ W. MIkAGf GT ~ r~trusi~ca~~ off ~~ • ~. iI n) v n 12 a Iv a r, T I MEA 0 S ~3) W ` I ? 0. 2 } I 2 ~ Ep 0 ~) W F~ a s a ~ W. FIE~DSTREAMD~R_~(\\~7 k STREA ST. ~ 3' ~ I 2 3 S I p\, y y 10 I I 12 /Z J z 32 T h, { S °~ v •s 2 3 I ' '~ti f 1 i~ 4 i "'r ,,` v~ ,.. ~ \ ii 0 j ~ it , s ,~ _ ~/ I I I ' i t I ~_-__ .. _ ._ _. _ ..... __ -- -.. T. _. _ . I I ~i s ` "- -`~ 9 ~~ rti~~ ._ __ . "..- --. _ r _ 14 ../ ~ 4 IS ~~ ~ ~~ ? L 4 ~~ ~•~ ,) " I 2 :` C~IATEAU /'~ ~ ------- - -• - ~ - -- I L?) ~ ,- t ~ 4 i ! ~ ?T ~ 1 r L- `~~P~ ' ~ =41 .Q ~Gr c~ SITE \ ~ Q 6O 7 8 9 I I' 14 I 16 IT 16 Iti .:t) l ~ ~ " /~N~t~XED a W. KANDICE c ST 4 B 22 \ 16 IS 14 12 I 10 y 30 29 2• 3 ; 23 ~ I 2 3 4 5 .5 7 b d 9 2 ~ --- z W. _ NIGAN 9 ~ u _ RS ST 0. ~ 27 26 2SO 24 y ~, c n~ 3 I 14 13 I? 11 r. crrs* ~ L°/ ~6~ O 5 B ~ 7 <9 ~ S 4 2 I ~ a ~ 2 ~ ^~ IS 16 3 a S 6 Z 6 yl GEMSTONE OR i8 A20 X21^ 22 23 24 ~ 25~ 24 ~ ,,;~ 2 + 1 ~ 4 Zi 1 I y 3 11 S 3 4 v4' _._ 6 6 s 2 s ~ ~'Qi I ` ` ~ 7 sl V sl ~ , ~ti 2 ~~fF E,FiY CT ao v - - 29 29 10 3 27 22 ~ A4(~ OQ 26 23 21 ~ ~ "' ~ za 20 S Ilv 24 Q i -10 ~ \~1, ~ 19 7 - ~,PQ ~ 9 13 / !y 11 B / 14 ` I e la 16 15 in / 6 S 17 I-- ~ _. _. _. _ 6 T ~ 9 ;: 4 9 ~~ ~" 10 P • NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., on June 7, 1994, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of Robert Glenn, for annexation and zoning of approximately 25.12 acres of land located in the SW 1 /4, Section 2, T. 3N, R. 1 W, Boise-Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is generally located on North side of Cherry Lane between Sunburst Subdivision and Sunnybrook Farms Subdivision. The Application requests annexation with zoning of R-4. A more particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Dated this 16th day of May, 1994 ~---~ 1 WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CITY CLERK C~ ''Iu-/~ ~~ O . S I •/ \ k ' _ S -~ t ~? (10 ..; r ? 17 a. ' ~ , nl ti '. I, ~, s, 1 • 11 G 1 .. .. 10 ~~ =, 4 ~ .:, /~" d~ C;, S: Y r s \ ` \ T -- C 1] ,, ~, 1 ? ~~ 1 > > ~ I ? -- - - a C_~ATEAU -/' ~ `]1 . 1 I ~ ?A :.1 n • i ] •~ ?T • r w la C ~ LL bT. • 1~ Z7 2e ?I1 /.~ • 1 > > 11 e 7 • • ' ala \~ -. IO ~~ 6 ~ ~ v SITS ?, ~ +9, s, ro ' V !1 ' Fti sE ~ . S~FZY GT ' . e 9 i e s 1 I I• I la a le a :o z ~EfF eo ~, /~NNfrXED _ •- ze ze 10 s W KANpCE SL __~__ 27 22 ~~ 1 9 t? *~ OO Ye ~ ~ 21 ~- le le 11 12 I 10 b !0 ?e 2e ~ 20 20 2.1 ! 1 I - Q 3 ; 1 x 3 • s .5 7 a 9 - 1 21 ~? ly ~ .. ~ to a ~ z - -- f W. HIGAN _ S_T ~+ ` n es zsy z• T _ ~PQ• ~ _. a 91 ~ I• uV 1? I~1 u d ~i T r, ! • ° r e Is / !yy A . ~. ~~ ~. ~ / I• Ie le m z ~ e c~ G s ? ~ a ] 6 Z 6 '•li H 1] li O ~ D / yl GEMSTONE __ DA ~ ~- ~ ~ e s 17 \ 'tl --_ zo zl n zti z• zs za W ~ 1/ m MISTY ~ ~~ q /; . ~13 n S N8U ST U ~- "~ • 1/ I ~S I• I?G W 19 le 17 16 le I• ?( ~ ~:J 16 u I] \ / 1 IS 11 X11 ~ / ' II ~i Q li ~ \~O? \ ' Io s W. STEPHANIE CT 1] e ~ ~~ ""- - ~u ~ \ - • Oµ r J t9 ~ W 1• " / ~, ~i 16 • ~ 1 e • ~0 a 1? F ~ ~?~~\ Y/ i S ~ fu ~s ,. \ , ~•~ • 1 2 S Z 2 ~ -- e ///''' . _ ._. _ .7 7 W ANN ST ~ ~., ~ 6 ] 1 ]t I •1 ~~ // I ~ Take f,om Geo%9ica/~-~'v'1~~ M+,.s I - -~-------- - - .... . _ .... __ . _ ... _ _ - . _ _ ___ ._ ._ __ _ - r f' r I~Tarch 31, i~94 • • Page 3 3, ~~ a:equest fcr modification, variance or waiver of any require- ment or policy outlined herein shall be made, in writing, to the Manager of Engineering Services within 15 calendar days of the original Commission action. The request shall include a statement explaining why such a requirement would result in substantial hardship or inequity, Should you have any questions or comments please. contact the Development Services Division at 345-7662. STAFF SUBMITTING: Larry Sale DATE OF COMMISSLON APPROVAL: APR 0 6 1994 • • NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., on April 12, 1994, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of Robert Glenn, for annexation and zoning of approximately 25.12 acres of land located in the SW 1 /4, Section 2, T. 3N, R. 1 W, Boise-Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is generally located on North side of Cherry Lane between Sunburst Subdivision and Sunnybrook Farms Subdivision. The Application requests annexation with zoning of R-4. A more particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. Dated this 22nd day of March, 1994 WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CITY CLERK • • LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET OF ANNEXATION REZONE REQUEST PARCEL R822218 0140 Ronald L. & Debra S. Dickerson 2887 W Ann St Meridian Id 83642 0270 Robert W. & Cathy J. Melton 2900 W Stephanie Ct Meridian Id 83642 PARCEL R$22219 0040 Penny L. Hansen 2869 W Ann St Meridian id 83642 0060 Phillip D.L. & Cassie Henderson 2835 W Ann St Meridian Id 83642 0080 John R. & Alice K. Brogan 1686 N Morello Ave Meridian Id 83642 0100 Thomas W. & Anita Walter 1732 N Morello Ave Meridian Id 83642 0120 William R. & Shirley J. Carroll 1778 N Morello Ave Meridian Id 83642 PARCEL R822219 0310 Clint B. & Melody J. Low 2812 W Gemstone Dr Meridian Id 83642 0330 Sunburst Homeowners Assoc 3775 Cassia Boise Id 83705 0260 Richard C, & Ann M. Masted 2899 W Stephanie Ct Meridian Id 83642 0280 Richard S. 8t Ginger L. Cooper 2908 W Stephanie Ct Meridian Id 83642 OOSO William P. Polfer & Shannon M. Massey 2851 W Ann St Meridian Id 83642 0070 Barry L. Lalka 1662 N. Morello Ave Meridian Id 83642 0090 Barbara Hendrix 1708 N. Morello Meridian Id 83642 0110 Vickie J. Morgan 1764 N Morello Meridian Id 83642 0320 Kenneth A. & Monica Tetrault 2830 W Gemstone Dr Meridian Id 83642 0340 William & Jo Ann Stuhr 2858 W Gemstone Dr Meridian Id 83642 (1) • 0350 William & Jo Ann Stuhr 2858 W Gemstone Dr Meridian Id 83642 PARCEL R822221 0180 Em-N-Henry's, Inc P.O. Box 6543 Chico CA 95927 0200 Timothy E. di Laura J. Danielson 2938 W Kandice Ct Meridian Id 83642 0190 Diane M. Dufra 1951 Cool Cteek Meridian Id 83642 0210 Patricia A. Rule 2910 W Kandice Ct Meridian Id 83642 0220; 0230; 0240; 0260; 0270; 0280; 0290; 0330 David L. & Diana S. Moser 0300; 0310; & 0320 2857 W Kandice Ct Hunemiller-Stuhr Par4nership Meridian Id 83642 2876 Gemstone Meridian Id 83642 PARCEL R822150 0150 Wilson C. & Wilma L. Bevington 2567 Rebecca Way Meridian Id 83642 0160 Greg A. Merrill 2571 Rebecca Way Meridian Id 83642 0170 Alan M. & Christy L. Doty 2375 Rebecca Way Meridian Id 83642 0190 Jimmy ~. Barber 2583 Rebecca Way Meridian Id 83642 0210 Curtis D. & Ellen M. Carney 2591 Rebecca Way Meridian Id 83642 0230 Gregory E. 8c Margaret Peterson 2599 Rebecca Way Meridian Id 83642 0250 James H. & Quinda M. Pooi 2609 Rebecca Way Meridian Id 83642 0270 David B. & Shawna M. Longo 2615 Rebecca Way Meridian Id 83642 0180 Karen R. Csutoras 1153 Haely Ct Rohnert Park CA 94928-1875 0200 Wallace H. & Kathleen Nakano 2587 Rebecca Way Meridian Id 83642 0220 A.J. & Amy Hare 6477 Fairview Ave Boise Id 83704-7773 0240 Richazd D. & Cynthia M. Belveal 2603 Rebecca Way Meridian Id 83642 0260 Jeffrey L. & Paula J. Abbott 261 Rebecca Way Meridian Id 83642 0350 Pardcia A. Vanshur 2578 Rebecca Way Meridian Id 83642 (2) • 0360; 8c 0370 Bruce R. & Leslie J. Bailey 260s Dalton Ln Boise Id 83704 0390 Ronald L. & Christine B. Schaffer 2611 Misty Dr Meridian Id 83642 0410 C. Aldon 8c Delora Johnson 26s 1 Misty Dr Meridian Id 83642 Os20 Michael J. & Mary Lindquist 2612 Misty Dr Meridian Id 83642 PARCEL R8221s1 003s Ronald R. & Sue G Shaw 2618 Rebecca Way Meridian Id 83642 OOSO Douglas J. & Carla J. Schoppelrey 2644 Rebecca Way Meridian Id 83642 0060 Steven C. & Kathleen S. Mahaffy 1879 Todd Way Meridian Id 83642 0090 Richard C. & Kelli A. Marston 1851 Todd Way Meridian Id 83642 0100 Nathan H. & Jackie L. Weeks 1963 Todd Way Meridian Id 83642 0110 Albert & Arvilla M Soggie 2646 Rebecca Meridian Id 83642 0120 Masuo & Mitsuyo Terada 4102 N Jones Ave Boise Id 83704 • 0380 Richard I. & Christie L. Poindexter 2600 Rebecca Way Meridian Id 83642 0400 Barry H. Muvr, et al 2s8s Misty Dr Meridian Id 83642 0510 American Bank of Commerce P.O. Box 6888 Boise Id 83707 0040 Kevin D. & Gwenda L. Field 2630 Rebecca Way Meridian Id 83642 DOSS Joseph E. & Lillian A. Turner 1891 Todd Way Meridian Id 83642 oohs Dorothy A. Barnett 1866 Todd Way Meridian Id 83642 0095 Forest O. & Erma Johnson 1833 Todd Way Meridian Id 83642 010s Gary R. & Jill C. McRae 2675 Rebecca Meridian Id 83642 0115 John G. & Marilea L. Boncz 2641 Rebecca Meridian Id 83642 012s Robert L. & Darla G. Nichols 2692 Rebecca Meridian Id 83642 (3) 0130 Randall A. 8c E. Mae Rodes 2582 Jeffery Ct Meridian Id 83642 0140 Marilyn Ann Myers 2085 Kristen Way Meridian Id 83642 0147 Dirk D. & Marcella F. Sparkman 5040 View Place Meridian Id 83642 0260 Harold R. Smith 1934 Todd Way Meridian Id 83642 0285 Sengkeo & Nhonhthone Kingmiaay 2562 Jeffery Ct Meridian Id 83642 0355 Terry W. & Carina R. Pirrong 2080 Kristen Way Meridian Id 83642 0385 William H. Brown 2091 Todd Way Meridian Id 83642 PARCEL R822153 0010 Daniel t. & Mary Sheridan 2220 Todd Way Meridian Id 83642 0030 Carla J. Burt 2160 Todd Way ~tdE~1 cD~Aa1 ~ n 83L¢2 0050 Kendrick E. & Eva C. Wallace 2140 Todd Way Meridian Id 83642 0170 A. Kelly & belwrah Winward 2661 Janelle St Meridian Id 83642 0200 Jimmy G. 8t Lois E. Ogilvie 2221 Todd Way Meridian Id 83642 • 0135 Heidi Buffs 2030 Todd Way Meridian Id 83642 0144 Thomas T. & Annette M. Forney 2073 Kristen way Meridian Id 83642 0255 Earl F. & Lora Foreman 1920 Todd Way Meridian Id 83642 0265 Edwin E. & Phyllis E. Hartsook 1974 Todd Way Meridian Id 83642 0350 Howard L. & Karen J. Downey 2110 Todd Way Meridian Id 83642 0380 Patsy Ruth Brazes P.O. Boa 1804 McCall Id 83638 0390 William W. & Shirley A. Clark 2061 Todd Way Meridian Id 83642 0020 Alvin W. & Wanda B. Joslyn 2196 Todd Way Meridian Id 83642 0040 R & M Homes, Inc. 2150 Todd Way Meridian Id 83642 0160 David W. & Debra S. Whitten 2151 Todd Way Meridian Id 83642 0190 Bette ]. Lester 2663 Chateau Dr Meridian Id 83642 0210 John E. & Linda K. Smith 2650 Janelle St Meridian Id 83642 (4) 0220 Mantel L. & Charann Rose 2660 Janelle St Meridian Id 83642 0240 William D. Mayes, Jr. 2540 W Chateau Dr Meridian Id 83642 PARCEL R822154 0150 Robin & Leslie Sisian 233 N Maxie Way Meridian Id 83642 0170; 0210; &0220 Fieldstone Development 1277E 17th Idaho Falls Id 83404 0190 Karen L. Laughlin 2415 N Maxie Way Meridian Id 83642 PARCEL R350825 • 0230 Sunnybrook Farms Homeowners Association P.O. Box 5714 Boise Id 83705 0160 Mike & Tina C. Pearson 900 Wild Phlox Boise Id 83709 0180 Scott E. & Sandra G. Pentzer 2397 N Maxie Way Meridian Id 83642 0200 Gregory L. Lewis & Alison Blake 2449 N Maxie Way Meridian Id 83642 0160 Haven Cove Homeowners Assoc 0170 Silver Maple Development Co., Inc. 3350 Americana Terrace Suite 200 P.O. Box 507 Boise Id 83706 Meridian Id 83642 0180 Daniel M. & Adare C. Evans 0190 Chester L. & Rena Vandewater 2610 W Leroy Ct 2634 W Leroy Ct Meridian id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 0200 L.R. & F.M. Stucker Trust 0210 Tony & Trudy McDonald 344 W Maple 2629 W Leroy Ct Meridian Id 83642 Meridian Id 83642 0220 Mary K. Moench 2601 W Leroy Ct Meridian Id 83642 PARCELS 1202233950; 244750; & 244800 PARCEL S 1202325640 Lake Jennings Vista Merit Homes, Inc. et al 4500 Imperial Ave 10451 Garverdale Ct San Diego CA 92113 Boise Id 83704 (5) • PARCEL S i 202325660 E.E. & Virgitia Brinegar 1639 Conant Ave Burley Id 83318 PARCEL S 1211212620 Lee R. & Fae M. Stucker Trust 2695 W Cherry Ln Meridian Id 83642 PARCEL 51211223020 The Do Quang & Thi Do Thug 4319 Filhurst Ave Baldwin Park CA 91706 PARCEL S 1211212500 Carl & Doris K. Stucker 2695 w Cherry Ln Meridian Id 83642 (6) ~ ~ PARCEL TO BE ANNEXED INTO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN PARCEL S 1202346780 Joan Brandt Priest 19833 Middleton Rd Caldwell Id 83605-9519 HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. GASS, Clty Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. Clly Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chfef WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888.4433 • FAX (208) 887813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor August 17, 1994 Donald Fisher 1750 Bearden Court Meridian, ID 83642 "Courtesy Notice of Awareness" RE: 1750 Bearden Court Glennfield Manor Subdivision Dear Mr. Fisher, COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner 8 Zoning Administrator JIM JOHNSON Chairman • Planning 8 Zoning It has been brought to our attention that the property listed above is in violation of Ordinance #623 of the City of Meridian. As the owner of this property, you are responsible for complying with the enclosed ordinance involving weeds and waste matters. Please remedy this situation as soon as possible. If there is any problem concerning this, please contact our office. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, William G. Berg, Jr. City Clerk Meridian City Council June 21, 1994 Page 6 • Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 9, T.3N, R.1 E, B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the public that would like Ordinance No. 651 read in its entirety? Seeing none I will entertain a motion on Ordinance No. 651. Corrie: Mr. Mayor, I move we approve Ordinance #651 with suspension of the rules. Tolsma: Second Ingsford: Moved by Bob, second by Ron to approve Ordinance #651 with suspension of the rules, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Corrie -Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #5: ORDINANCE#652 -ROCK CREEK SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION: Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the public that would like Ordinance No. 652 read in its entirety? Seeing none 1 would entertain on Ordinance #652. Tolsma: Mayor, I move we approve Ordinance #652 with suspension of the rules. Corrie: Second Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Bob to approve Ordinance #652 with suspension of the rules, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Corrie -Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #6: ORDINANCE#653 -ROBERT GLENN ANNEXATION: Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING Meridian City Council June 21, 1994 Page 7 CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the public that vu~ould like Ordinance #653 read in its entirety? Seeing none I will entertain a motion on Ordinance #653. Corrie: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve Ordinance #653 with suspension of the rules. Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Bob, second by Ron to approve Ordinance #653 with suspension of the rules, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Corrie -Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: The next 2 items on the agenda need to be tabled pursuant to not having them prepared, Counselor would you care to explain that to the Council for their edification. Crookston: Certainly, I have not been able to specifically find out what the status of these 2 matters is, and therefore I did not prepare the ordinance because I wasn't able to ascertain the exact status. Hopefully, we will have them at the next meeting. Kingsford: Does there need to be any change in the request for you to prepare that? Any questions from the Council? ITEM #9: ORDINANCE#654 - AVEST ANNEXATION: Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4, SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the public that would like Ordinance #654 read in its entirety? Seeing none I will entertain a motion. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move we approve Ordinance #654 with suspension of the rules. Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to approve Ordinance #654 with suspension • Meridian City Council June 7, 1994 Page 57 Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to have the City Attorney prepare an ordinance annexing and zoning, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Kingsford: Preliminary plat. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I am going to through the motion out and I don't know how it will be received, I would move that we approve the preliminary plat with a 20 foot landscape easement subject to staff conditions. Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to approve the preliminary plat subject to staff approval and a 20 foot landscape easement, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #22: PUBLIC HEARING: ANNEXATION AND ZONING BY ROBERT GLENN: Kingsford: At this time I will open the public hearing and invite the owner or his designee to speak first. Ted Hutchinson, 109 South Fort Street, Boise was sworn by the City Attorney. Hutchinson: Thank you Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, we are seeking annexation of approximately 25 acres. We are located on the north side of Cheny Lane, we are situated between the Sunburst Subdivision and Sunnybrook Farms subdivision. We have a preliminary plat which is presently before the Planning & Zoning Commission. These items were separated when the Planning & Zoning Commission sent the plat bads to us for some redesign and consideration. It is our intent to develop this parcel in compliance with the R-4 zoning designation which we are asking that the City of Meridian zone this parcel should you choose to annexation this particular parcel. We reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law and the recommendations that were issued by the Planning & Zoning Commission for the most part we understand and approve of the findings and conclusions. We are however, a little concerned with one of the conclusions. Before we ask for clarification we believe it is important for the Council to understand some of the constraints which are present at this site. Which have driven our particular site design. Prior to sumiting this application I spoke with Mr. Forrey, he was still in the capacity of your zoning director at that time, we discussed the areas development for requirements of the Meridian zoning and subdivision ordinances and sort of the basic expectations of the • Meridian City Council June 7, 1994 Page 58 Council concerning the new developments in the City of Meridian. We discussed the site and its physical characteristics we also talked about the development options given those physical constraints of the site. This site is bounded by irrigation and drainage ditches on basically 3 sides, there is a smaller irrigation ditch that runs down the 4th side. And all of these ditches are going to be required by the ordinance to be tiled or covered. I'd asked about the possibility of leaving these ditches open for improvement (inaudible) as a water amenity within the development. I was told that the ordinance required that all ditches which were less than a specific size be tiled. It is my impression from that discussion that there was very little chance that the tiling requirement could be removed. Some of my discussion with Mr. Forrey also centered upon density transfer for part of the site to provide parks based within the development to be located up near the Sunnybrook Farms site that they have as a neighborhood park. But this option I was told is subject to neighborhood approval through the public hearing process and given that the development pattern in the area was single family dwellings on R~ lots with R-4 densities it didn't appear on the surface that such density transfer would be favorably received by the general neighborhood. So information and impressionis that I received in the meeting with Mr. Forrey I discussed the options with the developer. With consideration of the parcel of land, the cost of tiling the ditches and other infrastructure costs which may include the necessary sewer lift station, the developer chose an option which simply developed the site with single family dwellings on lots which meet the development standards for the R-4 zone. A number of other design considerations have also arisen considering this development including the easements for the ditches, the street pattern and direct parcel access onto Cherry Lane. At first review the Ada County Highway District was denying any access onto Cherry Lane, ,that decision was made by staff, we took that decision of staff to the Ada County Highway District Commission and after hearing testimony from neighboring property owners and our proposal the Commission has permitted access onto Cherry Lane. So we have got a design with direct lot access onto Cherry Lane. This access aided our design and particularly when we considered our site is only 415 feet wide and yet extends fora 112 mile. ~ It has been very difficult to come up with a street design within that to give us a viable project. We also have been able to work out a basic agreement with the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District concerning the easements and the easements and the easement widths for the tiling of ditches. We will also be providing an easement for their maintenance of those tiled ditches. This left one area of contention with the neighboring property owners and in all possibility with the Council, that remaining issue is open space or park space. Tonight t tried to explain the process which has lead to our current site design. Park space was discussed with the developer, but because of simple economics the cost of providing park land within this development without the ability to negotiate other development options is simply too high given our understanding of the specific requirements of the zoning ordinance. We understand the importance of park space as an area develops, it is a benefit to the development if parks and open spaces are provided within that development. We also recognize the benefit to the r { • Meridian City Council June 7, 1994 Page 59 community. After reviewing the findings of fact and conclusions of law from the Commission I came to City Hall to speak with Ms. Stiles concerning those findings of fact and conclusions however she was out of the office and Mr. Forrey happened to be there on another matter. He did agree to speak with me concerning this because we did have some concern about the findings, specifically where he was mentioned in the findings of fact and conclusions of law. And it had to do specifically with open space in the area. Again we discussed the possibility of a density transfer and. Kingsford: Ted, do you happen to have the site where that is brought up in the findings? Hutchinson: I believe it is on page #11, it is under finding #9. It has to do with the development agreement and we have gone through this sited sections and we believe that we are addressing or can address those specific requirements that concern with the planning strip, I have a question about H2, which has to do with existing natural features which enhance development. We are not sure what that is, we have a flat site that is bounded by some ditches and a drainage that we are going to tile. But those tiling will be done as required by City code. And then pedestrian and bike paths then linear open space corridors those are things that we would like to get clarified from the Council tonight. After speaking with Forrey this afternoon, I again spoke with the developer concerning the matters and we are seeking direction from the Council for a method by which we can provide much needed open space while maintaining the viability of this project. Particularly if we can do it in a timely manner. We are seeking the guidance of the Council for a method in which we can develop the parcel in compliance with the R-4 zoning standards and we are wondering will a density transfer in (inaudible) reduction of lot sizes permit an opportunity for the developer of this site t develop this site in a viable manner. We are hoping for a reasonable determination from Council on this issue. We agree with the need for a development agreement, we are however a little concemed about the time frames in which these agreements are processed. We are aware of the demands in which Ms. Stiles works and having recently been on the public side of development I deeply emphasize with Ms. Stiles and her workload. I would encourage the Council to look at the addition of staff to aid Ms. Stiles because of the terrific growth which has been and is currently being experienced by the City. Finally we believe this is an unusual enclave and it can be developed in a manner which is compatible with the neighboring properties both the existing and proposed development of the area. This proposal complies with the requirements of the Meridian code conceming annexation and we ask for guidance, direction and options from the Council in addressing the need for park space in this particular section of the City of Meridian. We are particularly concerned about finding #30 that talks about existing naturally features and #31 the linear open space and the requirements that those are placed in the development agreement. We are looking for guidance as I have indicated on the open space requirements as Mr. Forrey has given indication that there is a need for open space in that area. Again we believe that it is i • Meridian City Council June 7, 1994 Page 60 • appropriate to annex this and would like your guidance in this particular matter. Are there any questions from the Council? Kingsford: Questions for Ted? Tolsma: You don't have a plat, a Late model plat map? Hutchinson: I have a late model plat map and we are trying to get all this nailed down so that we can get it back to staff for their review. Tolsma: This shows the road going out. Hutchinson: (Inaudible) Tolsma: This section in here Hutchinson: (Inaudible) Tolsma: And where does it go off over here, does it go off over here, (inaudible). Hutchinson: Chateau Drive comes through here I believe Kentfield subdivision is being developed north of that which would be adjacent to (inaudible). Tolsma: (Inaudible) Hutchinson: it will extend over to Ten Mile. Tolsma: Do you know what the size of the land is roughly this section right in here? Hutchinson: 1 can scale that off and give you a rough estimate. This is approximately less than 5. That raises the issue, as Mr. Forney indicated that density transfer within the development is possible for whatever we need to give up in here that we can make up in lots by reducing the lot size (inaudible). Again because the cost of the land and the requirements for the infrastructure (inaudible). We are looking for some direction. Tolsma: What we are looking at here, this would be an ideal point for a neighborhood park for everything in here with the Sunnybrook (inaudible). And then this area in here to be developed (inaudible). It would be anodfad Pthink we looked at th s earlier beflore the is why t was looking at that. As a matter development plans came in as a possible park site (inaudible). i • • Meridian City Council June 7, 1994 Page 61 Hutchinson: That is one of the things that has been discussed about this particular site it would be prime for a park however again we are looking for some kind of guidance is it possible to cluster some of the development or reduce the lot sizes so that we can still keep a viable project and still be able to work with the City of Meridian toward this common goal. Tolsma: Gary Smith had some comments in there about elevations for sewer flow, have you addressed him? Hutchinson: Mr. Mayor, Councilman we a~e rsrtbersaon this oneesponse from Mr. Smith concerning this I think he is working some Kingsford: Well, I would suggest to you Ron that as this plat comes through you work with Ted or the owner, I would just caution you that other jurisdictions have found that parks that small can be very costly per acre. I know that neighborhood association parks can be very nice depending on how strong the neighborhood association is. Tolsma: Well, that is why we have a proble else had it othebthan themrk here, some of the patrons of that park wish that somebody Hutchinson: I believe there are representatives of the homeowners association here tonight. Tina Morris, 2511 West Chateau, was sworn by the City Attorney. Morris: As of the last meeting, me and Mr. Hutchinson have been to quite a few meetings, we have been to ACRD meeting and ev eration he has done wi h de ling w thltusy acknowledge and thank him for all the coop Since our last meeting we have had a homeowners association, I have resigned, but I am keeping up with this since I started it I want to finish it. The homeowners of Sunnybrook Farm since Mr. Hutchinson has complied with a lot of our ~ fence n helone s de and just park as a private park. We are willing to go ahead if he wil keep it as a private park. We are understanding, we had proposed that he match us the acreage but it was still going to be under 10 acres for the park, so we agreed as homeowners to go ahead and keep it as a private park. And the only thing we want is maybe a couple of stop signs coming from Arrow Leaf from Chateau so they will stop before the park and maybe a children at play slow sign or something just so that the cars would be aware that there is a park there. Otherwise we are just grateful that he has been working with us and we know that he has had to flip flop his plans quite a bit to comply with our requests. And we are grateful of evet hin tthat pis goi g on Thank you. our meeting and the homeowners are aware r'Yt 9 .. • • Meridian City Council June 7, 1994 Page 62 Kingsford: Anyone else? Kenneth Tetrault, 2830 West Gemstone, was sworn by the City Attorney. Tetrault: I too would like to thank Mr. Hutchinson for all the compliance he has done as far as changing the plans to accommodate the people in the area surrounding Arrow Leaf. I am speaking as the president of Sunburst Homeowners association. And one of the things that Mr. Hutchinson mentioned is that deal about leaving the irrigation ditch open. Several of the residents of Sunburst would really like to see that be left as such. The first reason being that there are a large number of trees that are along that ditch and the individual who owns the property that is adjacent to the ditch where the trees are really doesn't want to see those trees removed and he did contact the irrigation district and they told him that in the event that ditch was tiled those trees would likely have to come out because the roots of the trees would penetrate into the tiled ditch. Another reason that the individuals in Sunburst would like to see that open is several of them also have are paying for water out of that ditch and that the irrigation district has told them in the event that ditch is tiled that they don't have the responsibility of getting water to the individuals who are on the property adjacent to it. And that is all that I needed to bring up. Morrow: I guess I would have some questions maybe .not for Kenneth but comments directly, with respect to the tiling of the ditch. if the tiling was done in high pressure plastic pipes obviously the tree roots would not penetrate the tiles and cause blockages of the ditch. The second issue is that if there are folks that are actively irrigating out of that ditch and have a water right there is no way that water right or access to that ditch can be limited or taken away in away diminished and certainly we are going to require the ditch to be tiled. So, it will be from the standpoint that those who are being serviced by the ditch continue to get their service. I Kingsford: He will have to be given access, some sort of a piping out. I just would comment you know with regard to tiling a ditch. We got in a situation where we ended up paying for tiling one because neighbors, not very far from this, being very upset about the safety and so forth. I guess I would suggest to you Ken that you be very careful who you say that to or the arrogation district will be out there cutting those trees down we have experienced that at a meeting here, we talked about trees out here on Overland Road and the next morning they were out cutting them down before we had a chance to ask them to leave them up. Tetrault: The individual that owns the property has already talked to the Nampa Meridian irrigation district. Kingsford: They might be out cutting them down as we speak then. Thank you, anyone • • Meridian City Council June 7, 1994 Page 63 else from the public that would like to offer testimony. Walt were you finished? Morrow: Those were the 2 issues, tiling with the plastic pipe and the access to the ditch. Kingsford: Anyone else that would like to offer testimony? Seeing none I will close the public hearing, as stated earlier the issue is really separated, the plat with regard to its production and the annexation and zoning. This evening you are dealing with the annexation and zoning issues only. Is the Council prepared to make a recommendation on that? First off findings. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I move we approve the findings of fact and conclusions as submitted and approved by Planning & Zoning. Yerrington: Second Kingsford: Mooed by Walt, second by Max to approve the findings of fact and conclusions as submitted and approved by P & Z, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All yea Kingsford: Is there a motion to have an ordinance drawn. Morrow: So moved Tolsma: Second Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Ron to have the City Attorney prepare an ordinance annexing and zoning that property all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All yea Kingsford: I would just comment that I understand that we took a pretty broad look at how we might utilize ball fields and cover irrigation ditches and it is not an easy chore. ITEM #23: WATER/ SEWER/ TRASH DELINQUENCIES: Kingsford: This is to inform you in writing, if you choose to, you have the right to a pre- determination hearing at 7:30 P.M. before the Mayor and City Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and defend the claim made by the City that your water, sewer, • Meridian Planning & Zoning June 14, 1994 Page 6 felt it was necessary. Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I make a motion that we pass onto the City Council a favorable recommendation conditioned on the City Zoning Administrator coordinating with ACRD and the developer to provide access onto West Pine Street and amended the plat to indicate 1400 square feet as a minimum home size. Shearer: Second Johnson: It is moved and seconded that we pass on a favorable recommendation onto the City Council conditioning 2 items access and square footage, all those in favor? opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #5: TABLED AT MAY 10,..1994 MEETING: ARROWLEAF SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT BY ROBERT GLENN: Rountree: We have a letter that says that is being withdrawn. Johnson: Read the letter. Alidjani: This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation of June 13, 1994 concerning the preliminary plat. Our client has decided to terminate this project. This project was scheduled for action before the Planning & Zoning Commission on June 14, 1994. Thank you for your assistance during this project. I look forward to working with you on other projects in the Meridian area. Respectfully, Patrick Tealey. Johnson: Thank you Mohammed. ITEM #6: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR HAVEN COVE NO. 5 SUBDIVISION: Johnson: Are there any points of discussion or corrections? Alidjani: Mr. Chairman, I make the motion the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission hereby adopt and approve these findings of fact and conclusions of law: Rountree: Second Johnson: It is moved and seconded that wee approve the findings of fact and conclusions of law as written, roll call vote. 4 ~ • Meridian Planning & Zoning - May 10, 1994 Page 12 Hepper: I move that we hold on the preliminary plat until we see a revised preliminary plat until the next meeting. Johnson: Is that a table of this item until the next regular meeting? Hepper: Yes, the next meeting, I'm not sure what the date is. Johnson: It would have to be for our next regular meeting it is too late for our special meeting. Hepper: What is the date of our next meeting? Johnson: June 14, we have to table it to a date sir. Hepper: Table it until June 14 Alidjani: Second Johnson: It is moved and seconded that we table action on the preliminary plat until we receive a revised plat and address that at our next regularly scheduled meeting on June 14, 1994, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #7: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR ROBERT GLENAI ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST BY ROBERT GLENN: Johnson: You have the findings of fact in front of you, are there any corrections, any discussion? Rountree: As I recall the applicant indicated they would pursue looking at possible additions to or improvements adjacent to the existing park at the northeast end of the subdivision, I don't see anything in the conclusions addressing that. Crookston: There aren't I didn't recall that. Johnson: 1 didn't hear your comment Wayne. Crookston: It is not addressed in the findings I didn't recall that. Johnson: Would you like to include that in your motion? . -~ .. • • Meridian Planning & Zoning May 10, 1994 Page 13 Shearer: Mr. Chairman, there were some problems involved also with the people that were paying for. the park with fees and obviously the people in this subdivision are going to end up using that park whether it is set up that way or not. I think we should do something to help relieve the situation somehow. Johnson: What do you have in mind? Shearer: I know what the problem is, I'm not sure what the solution is. Hopper: We have some comments Jim, from Shari on item 15 on the preliminary plat on this thing that addresses that a little bit. Shearer: I've got it here if I dig enough. Johnson: Would you like to amend the findings in anyway at this time? Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I would move that the Planning & Zoning Commission hereby adopts and approves the findings of fact with the amendment included in the conclusions that the applicant will explore improvements to or additions to the existing park on the northeast corner adjoining this subdivision. Johnson: We have a motion. Alidjani: Second Johnson: It is moved and seconded that we approve the findings of fact and conclusions of law with the amendment to regarding the park on the nortfieast corner, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Hopper -yea, Rountree -Yea, Shearer -Yea, Alidjani -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Johnson: Recommendation to pass onto the City Council gentlemen. Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I move the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council that they approve the annexation and zoning as stated in the application with the conditions set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law. Alidjani: Second • ~ '' ~- . Meridian Planning & Zoning May 10, 1994 Page 14 Johnson: It is moved and seconded that we pass a favorable recommendation onto the City Council, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #8: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR ROCK CREEK SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT BY KEVIN HOWELL: Johnson: Any discussion or corrections regarding these findings of fact? Hepper: Mr. Chairman, I move the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission hereby adopt and approves these findings of fact and conclusions. Rountree: Second Johnson: It is moved and seconded that we approve the findings of fact and conclusions of law as prepared by the City Attorney, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Hepper -Yea, Alidjani -Yea, Shearer -Yea, Rountree -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Johnson: Any recommendation for the City Council? Hepper: Mr. Chairman, I move the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the annexation and zoning as stated above for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law and that the applicant and owners be specifically required to the all ditches, canals and waterways and install pressurized irrigation systems as conditions of annexation and that the applicant meet all of the ordinances of the City of Meridian specifically including the development time requirements and enter into the required development agreement and if the conditions are not met that the property be de-annexed. Alidjani: Second Johnson: It is moved and seconded that we pass on a favorable recommendation to the City Council, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: MAY 10. 1994 APPLICANT: ROBERT GLENN AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 7 REQUEST: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW A EN Y COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER:. ~~~~~,~,~ ~ ,(~ ar Pyo~~ ~ d,~g~"'~ ~ ~~ PS uh ~P ~~,,~~~s~'~~ ~~~~ ~~f~~af~~ ~~~`~ • Meridian Planning & Zoning April 12, 1994 Page 25 FIVE MINUTE RECESS ITEM #8: PUBLIC HEARING: ANNEXATION AND ZONING FOR ROBERT GLENN: Johnson: I will now open the public hearing, is there a representative for Mr. Glenn that would like to address the Commission, please do so at this time. Ted Hutchinson, 109 South Fort Street, Boise, was sworn by the Attorney. Hutchinson: Thank you Mr. Chairman and members of the Commission, I am Ted Hutchinson of Tealey's Surveying representing the applicant in this case Mr. Bob Glenn. We are seeking annexation and a current rezone of the 25 acre parcel located on the north side of Cherry Lane. Approximately a 1 /4 mile east of the intersection of Ten Mile and Cherry Lane. This parcel is contiguous to the City of Meridian on 2 sides and actually getting close to 3 sides at this point. It is wedged in between the Sunnybrook Farms subdivision and the Sunburst subdivision and Kentfield subdivision which is under development and Tuthill subdivision which is also under development at this time. We are asking for a concurrent rezone with this annexation to an R-4. I believe the R-4 is compatible and consistent with the development which is existing in that area. We are working on a subdivision proposal at this time. Due to the configuration of the parcel being approximately 414 feet wide and over approximately 1 /2 mile deep it has presented a number of interesting challenges to design the lots for this proposal so that it will comply with the provisions of the development in the R-4 zone. We are taking into consideration the number of streets which are stubbed into this parcel, we have spoken with the Ada County Highway District and their preliminary assessment is that they don't want to allow another access onto Cherry Lane so we are going to have to accommodate the traffic through the interior streets which are existing. Again when we present the subdivision proposal we are hoping that they may reconsider that so that we can have an access onto Cherry Lane. Again we are taking into consideration the streets that are in the area, the existing development. We are trying to be compatible, the tot sizes will be over 8,000 square feet in size so that they will be consistent with the type of development that is occurring in that particular area. Are there any questions that I might answer from the Commission at this time? Alidjani: Could you direct us with the comments that Gary Smith made please. Hutchinson: With regard to Mr. Smith's comments, as he has indicated with comment number 1 that it is contiguous to the city limits with the Sunburst and Sunnybrook. We will amend the legal description so it will include to the center line on Cherry Lane. With regard to the Rutledge Lateral, we intend to pipe that or the • • Meridian Planning & Zoning April 12, 1994 Page 26 that in accordance with the requirements of the zoning ordinance and the appropriate irrigation district. We noticed that there were several comments from the Irrigation district and we will work with the irrigation district to make sure those items have been complied with. Because of the length and distance of that, or the location of that it will be necessary for us to deal with that in the most efficient manor. But we will comply with the requirements of both the code and the irrigation district. Then again the stub streets from Sunnybrook and Kentfield and Sunburst, we have been talking with the Highway District and we are trying to make sure we accommodate those stub streets into the development proposal as it is being prepared. The sewer line, apparently this parcel has been looked at a number times and the only reason it has remained vacant, or one of the major considerations has been the provision of sewer to the parcel. It appears that a lift station may be in order an we will have to work with Mr. Smith the engineer to make sure that the sewer needs for this particular proposal can be met. Alidjani: So, you don't have any problem either with Gary Smith's comments or Nampa Meridian Irrigation? Hutchinson: No, we have no problems with those. Johnson: Any other questions? Rountree: Approximately how many lots do you anticipate being able to come up with in this parcel? Hutchinson: I believe we have come up with 87 at this point. We are staying within the development guidelines for the zone density and the lot sizes. We want to make sure we comply with the provisions of both the zoning ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. Rountree: Have you given consideration to the possibility of expanding the neighborhood park facility that is at the end of Sunnybrook Farm? Hutchinson: We looked at that as an option, I believe that is, I don't know if that is a public park or a homeowners association common lot. I don't know at this point whether or not that can be accommodated. We have looked at this proposal in the larger scheme of things. We are 1 believe within a 1 /2 mile of Cherry Lane golf course and also within a 1 /2 mile of the proposed regional park at Ustick and Ten Mile. Johnson: Any other questions? Thank you, this is a public hearing, anyone else from the public like to address the Commission? • • Meridian Planning & Zoning April 12, 1994 Page 27 Tina Morse, 2511 West Chateau, was sworn by the Attorney. Morse: I am here representing Sunnybrook Farms homeowners association, phase 2, 3, and 4. Our concern with this is one of the main concerns is our park. We have been feeling the burden as phases 2, 3 and 4 for a few years with the surrounding subdivisions having to maintain the park itself. It is running use 53500 and the burden is just on the 3 phases. Which everybody has access to the park, we have just now in the last 2 years extend the park on 2 sides, we bought brand new equipment and updated the front and things like that. But on the park we have spent in the last 2 years probably 57,000 to 58,000 in upgrading it. Our concern is the access be denied to Cherry Lane is going to be put on Chateau and that is right in front of the park itself and the new subdivision is going to be right there. I guess if we can have them maybe, if they have an association fee to maybe help us maintain the park or deny access on Chateau to the park. And that is all I have to say. Johnson: Thank you very much, any questions? Anyone else? Kathy Reierson, 2043 Kristin Way, was sworn by the Attorney. Reierson: I also live in Sunnybrook Farms, I haven't been active in the homeowners association, but I do pay dues like everyone else in the 3 subdivision areas. I have a real concern that I have to pay money yearly to help keep up this park that I was told the City requires us to have because of the size of our subdivision. I have heard testimony about a number of different subdivisions that are going in the surrounding area. Although I am not real familiar with all of those plats I don't believe there are parks in all of them just like we have. I have a real concern that I should have to pay yearly fees to upkeep something that adjacent subdivisions are going to come into and possibly be using. Especially this one that we just heard testimony about which is probably going to use access through our subdivision because they are apparently being denied access from the Ada County Highway Department. I would like to know what can be done to make sure that more than just our subdivisions are paying these fees. I just don't think this is fair at all. I think if the City approves this perhaps the City should take the park over and they should fund it and the homeowners should not a burdened with this in Sunnybrook Farms. I am not at all pleased with this. Johnson: Do you have any other suggestions other than the City taking over the park? Reierson: Well, any donations, I don't like having to pay. I just got a flyer the other day from my child's elementary school, Linder elementary school that they are bringing children to this park in our subdivision to fly kites a couple days of the week. • Meridian Planning & Zoning April 12, 1994 Page 28 I have been told that our subdivision has liability for any children in that park at the time. I don't like the fact that I have some liability for some child who gets hurt in there when they are not even paying any kind of homeowners association dues to use that. Johnson: Are you taking a position and I don't mean to paint you in a corner here, but are you taking the position that you would like to see access to that park denied for anyone except those people living in Sunnybrook? Reierson: I guess I would say that, because we are the only ones paying money for that and we are told that we were required to have that park by the City. But it was for the use of the homeowners. Johnson: Any questions? Hepper: t have a question, did I hear that Sunnybrook Farms 1, 2, and 3 are the phases that are paying for that? Morse: {End of Tape1 Right now Sunnybrook Farms has 5 phases and as of now 2, 3 and 4 are the only ones that are paying the yearly fee to maintain the park. Alidjani: Is it true that number 1 subdivision or a portion is in the park? Morse: The park was not there as of yet, but there is a grandfather clause in the association papers that says that because of the grandfather clause that one was deleted from having to join the homeowners association, but when phase 5 came, it was deleted also for reasons I don't know. But 2, 3 and 4 are the only ones that are paying the fees. We are liable if ,something happens in the park, we carry our insurance for it. Alidjani: I just wanted to have it on record that when phase 1 was put together the park didn't exist. Morse: Right, it was just platode in. Also, I wanted to state too that if there is a way of clearing this up maybe if the new development if they want to contribute some of the money to help maintain the park. It is a private park, it belongs to the association but we can't see having 2, 3 and 4 carry the burden all by ourselves with all the adjoing subdivisions. Shearer: How much are the yearly fees? • i Meridian Planning & Zoning April 12, 1994 Page 29 Morse: They were 560 and last year we voted it in and dropped them to 555 because the homeowners were complaining that they were tired of paying them. Also it takes like 535,000 to 540,000 a year to maintain the park. Bill Carroll, 1778 North Morrello, was sworn by the Attorney. Carroll: I live in Sunburst subdivision on the corner of Gem Stone and Morrello. Gem Stone is a street that is stubbed off and my property is directly adjacent to this proposed subdivision. I guess my main concerns are the amount of traffic that is going to increase coming through Sunburst, we don't have a park. We are a new subdivision a couple years old is all. There is a lot of small children that live on Gem Stone on Morrello, on Bing right as you come into Sunburst subdivision. I would kind of like to see Gem Stone left atone and not connected into anything. We like it just the way it is. There is also an irrigation ditch there, I don't know what they have in mind, I haven't seen a plat for it. The ditch has a bunch of trees on lit that has a pretty good ecosystem in the trees, there are raptures that live in the trees all summer, a family of hawks, some owls, squirrels and they are kind of nice to have around. If they have to and if they bring Gem Stone on through they are going to have to fill that ditch in, the it or something. Those trees are right on the ditch bank so probably have to tear those out. There is a lot of concern in the subdivision that I live in our association president is here and he would kind of like to speak to you gentlemen. He can have a few more particulars than I do, but I wanted to give my opinion on public record. The traffic is the big thing, I think. Johnson: Thank you, is your tot #13? Carroll: Yes I am lot #13. Johnson: Any questions? Anyone else? Sue Sheehan, 2541 West Chateau, was sworn by the Attorney. Sheehan: Well I am kind of ditto on all of the park stuff, I am in Sunnybrook Farms too. But I want to take just another step further. The traffic on Chateau right now, the park kind of dead ends that they are talking about opening that right up and that wilt go right in front of the park. We have a real speeding problem there. I've called before and I have asked fora "slow children at plat sign" and I don't know. There is one stop there and that is all there is coming up. The problem is we need a Johnson: Excuse me, could you just indicate who you called, that is kind of important. • Meridian Planning & Zoning April 12, 1994 Page 30 Sheehan: I called the City Hall here. Johnson: You called the City. Sheehan: I have called a couple of times and requested please could we have a "slow children at play sign at Sunnybrook Farms Park. They had told me they might have an interest in taking that park over one time if it was more than 1 acre, if it is close to 3 acres and it is 3 acres. I do want that on public record, because I called Story Park, the man who is in charge of Story Park and he told me they might be interested in taking the Sunnybrook Farms park over and making it a public park. I don't know if we can pursue that or not. The other problem is that if the subdivision goes in like they are saying and they can't come off of Cherry Lane. The problem is in front of the park again, we don't have sign, a stop sign and now they are speeding terrible and it is a dead end. So, I don't know what they are going to do if you open it up. It really is going to be a problem. Then the other concern that I have is the schools. Why are there no proposals, I understand, is this true that the school is 5 years away. If they are going to put all those homes in to the left us they are putting homes in, phase 5, where are these kids going to go to school? So, I would really like to bring up the school issue, I think it is more of a problem. The traffic is bad yes, and t know the growth is bad but we have to have schools too. I ditto everything the said about the park and I think it is not fair for only 3 phases to be paying dues and 1 think we need to watch for our children in the park. I guess I am wanting it on public record that maybe we could give the park to the City. Alidjani: I have one question please, you mentioned something about there is no sign, there is no stop sign, could you be more specific about what location? Sheehan: Well, there is one stop sign over there and it is on Todd Street and faces Chateau and Chateau goes down. When they open it up it will clear through the next stop sign is clear down 4 blocks. Alidjani: So, there are 2 stop signs right now? Sheehan: Well, there is one on Todd. Alidjani: So, your concern is after they open Chateau to the next subdivision, is there going to be a sign or not? Sheehan: If they are going to open that up, then I think there should be at least a 3 way stop. And stop everyone at that park so they don't run over children. • • Meridian Planning & Zoning April 12, 1994 Page 31 Alidjani: So your suggestion is for the future? Not at the moment. Sheehan: No, I think children, no that is if it is opened up, what I am suggesting right now is a slow children at play sign. Alidjani: (Inaudible) our Police Commissioner is somewhere in the room and he is hearing all of this. Sheehan: So if I want something done I should ask tonight. Johnson: I appreciate your comments, any questions? Anyone else? Ken Tetrault, 2830 W. Gem Stone, was sworn by the Attorney. Tetrault: The first concern of the homeowners of Sunburst was with the zoning of this tract, now I understand that the R-4 is consistent with the other zoning in the area. That is 4 homes per acre. Johnson: That is the maximum allowable. It usually comes out less than that. Tetrault: Then as Mr. Carroll mentioned most of the homeowners in Sunburst are concerned about the status of Gem Stone Drive on the east end of Sunburst Subdivision and that at the present time the street is dead ended and most of the residents of Sunburst would love to see it remain that way. I don't know if anything can be done in as far as the City goes to accomplish this or is something would have to be done through Ada County Highway District. The next thing is another thing that Mr. Carroll mentioned and that is regarding the irrigation ditch. As he said there are several trees that are right down on the irrigation ditch and there are many different sorts of wildlife that live in these trees and the trees in the surrounding area. If these trees are removed there is a good chance that the family of squirrels and hawks that live in the area every summer would leave and not come back. And so will the other birds and squirrels would not find it that inviting an area anymore. I also do have one other question that maybe doesn't pertain to this, but some of our homeowners mentioned that they heard at a previous meeting with the city something about the city or irrigation district taking control of wells in subdivisions. I was wondering if I could get some clarification on that. Johnson: Anything else? Tetrault: That is all I have. • • Meridian Planning & Zoning April 12, 1994 Page 32 Johnson: Thank you very much. Anyone else? Charlene Miller, 3740 Quaker Ridge, was sworn by the Attorney. Miller: I just wanted to let you know my concern as far as the subdivisions going and the one that is mentioned at this point because I live in Cherry Lane subdivision. As far as the overload it is going to be on Linder and Meridian Middle and Meridian High and the other ones that have been mentioned prior. The schools, the parks and I just want you to know my concems and I want the developers to know my concerns and partly as a community too. And we need to ask ourselves what is it going to do to better our community by not having adequate schools and parks and just an area where we want our families to live and grow up. Johnson: Thank you, next there was another hand way in the back. Melody Lowe, West Gem Stone Drive, was sworn by the Attorney. Lowe: Well, I live on Gem Stone and I bought the original farm house when it was a farm. I am the one that lives along the ditch and has the trees there. I don't want to see the road go through especially if there is no entrance to the subdivision. That is a lot of undue stress cause on our children. Right now people are pretty free to be able to play, if we want to toss a football down the road we can do it all through there. If you open that up it will all change. The ditch, if you take the trees down we have osprey, all of you are welcome to come and look at the wildlife that fives there, there are all kinds of nesting. There are eagles, hawks, turtledoves, squirrels, and there is even an owl. And as far as the schools, Linder already has 2 trailers and with all of these subdivisions where are you going to put all of these kids. I hear that you ask that the subdivisions, the developers to provide space for this but they are not going to because that takes up the money that they are going to make. So, it needs to be demanded at some point that this is taken care of and soon. It is very hard on my son who has to go from the trailer into the school to go to the restroom. It is hard on the teacher and it is hard on all the students. Everything is interrupted, and not only that when he makes that trip from the trailer to the school who is out there making sure he is safe from the buildings. Because there is nobody out there unless it is recess. So, I think you need to consider that we don't want to keep just adding trailers to our schools but we need to build new ones. Thank you Johnson: Thank you Melody, anyone else? Scott Campbell, 1713 North Morello, was sworn by the Attorney. • Meridian Planning & Zoning April 12, 1994 Page 33 Campbell: I would like to re-state to show my extreme concern for the increase in traffic that is going to be brought through the Sunnybrook and Sunburst subdivisions if there is no entrance allowed to the subdivision. He state that there is going to be 87 lots I believe and that is 2 cars per house on average that is going to be using Sunburst and Sunnybrook as a through way into their subdivision and it would really cause a strain on the subdivisions, I believe. That is all. Johnson: Thank you, there was one other hand here. Jan de Weerd, 2090 W. Chateau, was sworn by the Attorney. de Weerd: My concern too, is one traffic load also on West Chateau, (inaudible) it is a residential street and not a main highway. We have been living here 2 years and have seen the increase. Traffic flow, (inaudible) are putting down there. Most highways are driveways are built at a slight angle and some more than others so every time kids are playing on the driveway the risk increases as more traffic is utilizing that road. It is used unfortunately as a highway, most people don't live on that street and they have to cross through Glenfield Manor to get into their subdivisions. The traffic speed is too high and obviously a high concern currently for kids and do like to keep them all and see them grow up. Second concern is the school overload, several times mentioned here. I am very much aware that we need to facilitate as a City as a community growth that we are experiencing here. But, it shouldn't go on the cost of the level of living and freedom of people that live here currently. And creative solutions need to be found for that. And creative solution is to be ahead with your facilities. I am aware that the School board is responsible for increasing school facilities but you as a commission should be aware that your decision will impact the level of education that my kids and their future potential they will have by these decisions of adding subdivisions. Johnson: Thank you, next, anyone else? I will close the public hearing. Mr. Alidjani, you had questions for Gary Smith. Alidjani: Gary, 2 or 3 times they have brought up a point if Gem Stone gets connected to this new proposal that the ditch has to be tiled, trees have to be removed and squirrels are going to be put to death. Is that correct? Smith: Mr. Chairman, and Commissioners, it is my understanding from our present City ordinance that atl ditches are required to be tiled. The Council is making variances now and I understand that there is a re-write in the process to limit those tiling to ditches that have 48 inch or smaller tile. I guess whether or not the trees comes down would depend on where the trees are located. • • Meridian Planning & Zoning April 12, 1994 Page 34 Alidjani: Would this particular ditch be considered under or above 48 inches? Smith: I don't know. Alidjani: Bill do you have an answer? Bill: Probably greater than 48 inches, it is probably 5 foot wide at the bottom of the ditch. Alidjani: So, do we have a chance to save the wildlife? Smith: Again, it is the size of the ditch, it is probably an irrigation district ditch and we come under their jurisdiction. So, they would be involved in the process as well. Their, as you are aware, they are very cautious about development around ditches, especially ditches that size. The other question you had about the welts, the City has been in conversation for some time off and on with Nampa Meridian Irrigation District concerning on site pressurized irrigation systems as being a requirement of new subdivisions by the City of Meridian. And the fact that Nampa Meridian Irrigation would assume operation of those pressurized systems. I don't know what their attitudes are toward existing systems. The one in Sunburst Subdivision as I understand it is very well run and operates very well. They have a good source of water, it is a well. I don't have an answer on existing systems, how Nampa Meridian would look at those if they did become managers of pressurized irrigation systems. Johnson: Thanks Gary, any other questions? Hepper: I have a comment, whereas Sunnybrook Farms only has a single entrance to it, I don't know if this is the time to address this or when we get the preliminary plat, but I think the City should really encourage another entrance onto Cherry Lane. I don't think it is incumbent upon the other people and subdivisions to put up with the traffic. Johnson: I think we are somewhat ill prepared because we don't have ACRD comments. And we don't have a plat, but just looking at the sketch map we have, it is obvious that they don't want too many cuts in a close proximity of one another. And that is probably the concern at this point. We have a comment that they don't want it there, we haven't actually seen any comments. And perhaps they are offering some other alternative, I don't know. Hepper: And I realize that. • • Meridian Planning & Zoning April 12, 1994 Page 35 Johnson: Your point is taken well, it is just that the other cuts and we are talking a narrow entrance way. Hepper: And that is not a decision we make. I also think the park area back there, that is also not a decision that is up to us, but I think the City has got a real opportunity there to pick up some park land before it is all gone. And maybe make that park a little bit bigger and take over the control of it. It appears that the park is out on the fringes of the people that are paying for. And there are several subdivisions around there that are going to be using it unless you put up a fence and don't let people in there. Johnson: As you know the City is developing their posture right now on that, parks in general. Perhaps a merger with Western Ada Recreation District, so that is a matter of policy that is being determined right now. Hepper: I think maybe the developer could talk to the City about that and see if something could be worked out on that too. It may or may not be the type of thing they are attracted to because of size. My understanding, the smaller the park the bigger the headache from the City's perspective. Any other comments or discussion? What would you like to do on this application? Hepper: Mr. Chairman, 1 move we have the City Attorney prepare findings of fact. Rountree: Second Johnson: We have a motion for the City Attorney and a second to prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law on this annexation and zoning request for Robert Glenn, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #9: PUBLIC HEARING: ANNEXATION AND ZONING FOR PINE MEADOWS: Johnson: I will now open the public hearing on that application. Is there a representative that would like to address the Commission? Ron Walsh, 12002 Fiddler Drive, Boise, was sworn by the Attorney. Walsh: I am here tonight representing 3 landowners that are requesting to have 23.3 acres annexed into the City of Meridian. I've got the staff comments and I want to say that we don't have any major objection to any of the comments. The City • • Meridian Planning & Zoning April 12, 1994 Page 20 Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I make a motion that we pass a favorable recommendation onto the City Council on this Conditional Use Permit. Crookston: We need findings of fact. Rountree: In addition to that motion I move we prepare findings of fact with a favorable recommendation to the City Council. Alidjani: Second Johnson: It is moved and seconded that we have the City Attorney prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law and include in that a favorable recommendation to the City Council, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #7: PUBLIC HEARING: ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR FIRE LIGHT ESTATES BY RUNNING BROOK ESTATES INC. AND NUBBLE ENGINEERING: Johnson: I will now open the public hearing, if there is a representative for Fire Light Estates please come forward and be sworn. Gene Smith, 9550 Bethel Court, was sworn by the Attorney. Smith: The proposed subdivision of Fire Light Estates consists of 27 lots on 8.1 acres for a density of approximately 3.3 dwelling units per acre. We are requesting a zone change, annexation, and preliminary plat approval. The site is located south of Ustick on Ten Mile Road. It is surrounded by R-4 zoning on practically all 4 sides, therefore the compatibility of the zoning fits into the existing conditions. The applicant is proposing a minimum 1500 square foot homes in the range of 5115,000 to 5165,000. The access to this project would be off of Ten Mile and also through the proposed Englewood Creek subdivision to the north. All the streets are proposed to be built to ACHD standards. The sewer will be connected to the north through the proposed Englewood Estates subdivision. Water will also be connected through Englewood Subdivision as well as looped out onto Ten Mile. And the comments that I felt had merit were those comments from Gary Smith and I would like to address those specifically item #2. I'm sorry item #3, verify the lot 14 and 17 block 2 have 8,000 square feet, we will have all of these lots have minimum square footage. Item #5, lots 10 - 13 on block 2 don't have an 8,000 square foot, we had originally proposed a 15 foot landscape buffer strip adjacent to Ten Mile Road by reducing that • • Meridian Planning & Zoning April 12, 1994 Page 21 to a 10 foot landscape buffer strip these lots would have the 8,000 square foot usable area. Which I feel would be an acceptable proposal. The other major issue on Mr. Smith's comments was the fact that the project is in a zone AE flood zone. Currently that flood zone is being worked on with the project to the north in order to eliminate that flood zone a new culvert will be installed under Ustick and a letter of map revision will be applied for with FEMA to take the entire area out of the AE zone. Johnson: Does that conclude your remarks? Smith: Yes, do you want me to answer any other questions? Alidjani: Mr. Smith, Item #2, there is a concern that some of the lots are not 80 foot frontage, you didn't mention anything about item #2, I am curious. Smith: On the curve sections, I believe that is what he is referring to. Alidjani: Well he is referring to Lot 2, Block 1, Lot 14, Block 2, Lot 3, Block 1 and Lot 13, Block 2. Smith: Specifically he was requesting the building setback to be back 45 foot for the minimum width. It does not have minimum street frontage that is correct. Alidjani: So, did you address that for item #2 on that plat or is that still as Gary has seen it before? Smith: Nothing has changed. Alidjani: Thank you Hepper: Would the sidewalk, would that be in the landscape easement, would that be a 5 foot sidewalk? Smith: The landscape easement on Ten Mile, that landscape easement is outside of the proposed right of way. Hepper: Okay, so the sidewalk would not be included in that 10 foot easement. Curb, gutter sidewalk and then 10 foot easement. Would there be a homeowners association to maintain that? Smith: It is proposed that it is a landscape easement on each of the individual lots, so that there would not be separate homeowners association. And they would • Meridian Planning & Zoning April 12, 1994 Page 22 address within the CC&R's that those homeowners would be responsible for the maintenance of that landscaping. Hepper: Would they have to keep their fences Smith: On the easement line. Hepper: The back of their property line, the easement would not be included in there in their fencing area. In other words you would not come up to the sidewalk. Smith: That is correct and I would propose reducing that to 10 foot so you do have the 8,000 square foot of usable lot area. Hepper: Would the developer put in the grass and shrubs and sprinkler system and all of that and then turn that over to the homeowners? Smith: They would put in the initial landscaping yes. Hepper: What about sprinkler system, would there be 1 sprinkler system for that whole strip or would each homeowner be responsible for watering that strip strictly adjacent to their property? Smith: Well, I think you would really have to tie it onto each property, where you don't have a single, a homeowners association to run the system. Each property owner would have to be responsible for landscaping and maintenance thereof. Hepper: Would there be shrubs and trees along there or just strictly grass, what do you have in mind. Smith: They are intending on, the developers are intending on putting the initial landscaping including some shrubs and trees and making a requirement within the CC&R's that the homeowners be responsible for bringing up landscaping on their entire property to a specific minimum. Any other questions? Johnson: Any other questions of Mr. Smith? Thank you, this is a public hearing, anyone else from the public like to address the Commission at this time? Seeing no one I will close the public hearing. Mr. Smith, Gary Smith, with respect to the comment regarding the frontage, can I have your input on that please and any other comments that you have. Eng. Smith: Mr. Chairman, Commission members, the lot, flag lot, the definition of • • Meridian Planning & Zoning April 12, 1994 Page 23 a flag lot as I read it from an ordinance iinaudible) and none of these lots in my opinion resemble a flag and therefore by ordinance an 80 foot frontage is required unless a variance is granted by the City Council and one has not been applied for that I know of. The 40 foot chord dimension applies to culdesac lots and it applies to lots that are on bulbs and I think we have gone through this before. Where some proposals have been made to reduce the frontage of lots that are on a curve in a street for one reason or another. This is my opinion of what a flag lot is and what flag lot is not. A flag lot does have an allowed 30 foot frontage if it is a true flag lot. These lots in my opinion are not flag lots, therefore they should be 80 foot frontages win compliance with the R-4 zone. The other thing I should mention, I didn't mention it in my comments in listening to the testimony all of the other subdivisions that I am aware of on Ten Mile Road and on Cherry Lane Road have provided a landscape buffer common area between the lots and the roadway. Ten Mile road is scheduled to be a 90 foot road right of way which is a 5 lane system. That is a center turn lane and 2 lanes in each direction for travel of vehicles. Candlelight subdivision which is shown to the east of this subdivision I believe has a 20 or 30 foot common lot that they provided with a tall berm and a fence. I think that everybody realizes that there will be a significant amount of road noise from this 5 lane roadway. I would suggest that some consideration be given to providing a buffer for that noise as well as a side buffer. I think you can all remember the problems that we had with Crestwood subdivision on Franklin Road. I don't personally think that was a correct solution but, because I think in time to come those people are going to which that there was a berm there to shield that. Did I answer your question on the frontage? Johnson: Yes you did, I expected that answer that is why I asked, I appreciate that. Eng. Smith: One more thing I might mention, we do have a sewer interceptor that travels along the south and west side of this subdivision. And it is very critical that the sewer interceptor not be fenced into the backyards of these lots. We need to maintain that 20 foot easement that we have over that sewer line. And that is a major interceptor and so we have to maintain access to that. The plat, even though the property goes to the center of the ditch, the plat, I guess it doesn't go to the center of the ditch, but anyway the plat needs to reflect that there will be no fences built, fencing that sewer off. Alidjani: Gary, I have a question, is that right between Candlelight and the other subdivision that is below that, the ordinal curbs and gutters because of the future expansion of Ten Mile. One has curbs and gutters and the other one doesn't sidewalks. Eng. Smith: Right, I think the Highway District changed their attitudes toward the • • Meridian Planning & Zoning April 12, 1994 Page 24 improvements with the advent of the impact fee structure. They are requiring sidewalks be constructed by not curb and gutter, they will come back later and improve that as the street is widened. Johnson: Any discussion? Any further questions? Rountree: I have the same concern as Gary on the landscaping on Ten Mile and being consistent, being under the control of the Homeowners association and some continuity in the appearance. As far as the zoning it is consistent with what is going on around it. I have some reservations about the preliminary plat however. Alidjani: Wayne, do you have a definition on the way you define the ordinance for flag lots and not a flag lot, do you have any comments on that? Crookston: Well, just as Gary said, excuse me a flag lot resembles a flag and you have a minimum amount of frontage. Johnson: When you are talking flag you are talking pennate, triangular as opposed to the American flag for example. Crookston: Well, it could be either way. And these do not appear to be flag lots to me either. Johnson: Is it the Commission's pleasure to take some action at this time. Shearer: I move we have the City Attorney prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law for this project. Johnson: Is there a second, if not the motion will die for lack of a second. Hepper: Mr. Chairman, I will second it, although I do have some reservations on the preliminary plat. Johnson: We can address those considerations in the findings of fact at that-time. That is probably appropriate to have findings of fact. We have a motion arad• and a second, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Johnson: We will take a 5 minute break. Meridian Planning & Zoning April 12, 1994 Page 25 FIVE MINUTE RECESS ITEM #8: PUBLIC HEARING: ANNEXATION AND ZONING FOR ROBERT GLENN: Johnson: I will now open the public hearing, is there a representative for Mr. Glenn that would like to address the Commission, please do so at this time. Ted Hutchinson, 109 South Fort Street, Boise, was sworn by the Attorney. Hutchinson: Thank you Mr. Chairman and members of the Commission, I am Ted Hutchinson of Tealey's Surveying representing the applicant in this case Mr. Bob Glenn. We are seeking annexation and a current rezone of the 25 acre parcel located on the north side of Cherry Lane. Approximately a 1 /4 mile east of the intersection of Ten Mile and Cherry Lane. This parcel is contiguous to the City of Meridian on 2 sides and actually getting close to 3 sides at this point. It is wedged in between the Sunnybrook Farms subdivision and the Sunburst subdivision and Kentfield subdivision which is under development and Tuthill subdivision which is also under development at this time. We are asking for a concurrent rezone with this annexation to an R-4. I believe the R-4 is compatible and consistent with the development which is existing in that area. We are working on a subdivision proposal at this time. Due to the configuration of the parcel being approximately 414 feet wide and over approximately 1 /2 mile deep it has presented a number of interesting challenges to design the lots for this proposal so that it will comply with the provisions of the development in the R-4 zone. We are taking into consideration the number of streets which are stubbed into this parcel, we have spoken with the Ada County Highway District and their preliminary assessment is that they don't want to allow another access onto Cherry Lane so we are going to have to accommodate the traffic through the interior streets which are existing. Again when we present the subdivision proposal we are hoping that they may reconsider that so that we can have an access onto Cherry Lane. Again we are taking into consideration the streets that are in the area, the existing development. We are trying to be compatible, the tot sizes will be over 8,000 square feet in size so that they will be consistent with the type of development that is occurring in that particular area. Are there any questions that I might answer from the Commission at this time? Alidjani: Could you direct us with the comments that Gary Smith made please. Hutchinson: With regard to Mr. Smith's comments, as he has indicated with comment number 1 that it is contiguous to the city limits with the Sunburst and Sunnybrook. We will amend the legal description so it will include to the center line on Cherry Lane. With regard to the Rutledge Lateral, we intend to pipe that or the MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: APRIL 12. 1994 APPLICANT: ROBERT GLENN AND TEALY'S AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: $ REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND 20NING A EN Y CITY CLERK: CITY EINGINEER: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 19 y CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: "REVIEWED" CITY FIRE DEPT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS ~ Z°,~' P~~ ~~` ~ ~~~t~~~ c~~l ~` 9~ ~~~ ~ ~