Elk Run Subdivision Nos. 1 & 2 AZ PP 'i HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live COUNCILMEN
OFFICIALS
WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk CITY OF MERIDIAN RONALOR.TOLSMA
ROBERTGIESLER
MAX YERRINGTON
JANICE GASS, Treasurer
BRUCE D. STUART, water works suet. 33 EAST IDAHO ROBERT 0. CORRIE
WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney
JOHN sHAwcROFT, Waste Water Spot.
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Chairman Zoning S Planning
JIM JOHNSON
KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief Phone (208) 888-4433
Centennial Cpordinator
BILL GORDON. Police Chiet
GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4813 PATSY FEDRIZZI
GRANT P. KINGSFORD
Mayor
TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your coin rots and recommendations will be
~
considered by the Meridian 9 Y
'S ~~
may we have your answer by~
TRANSMITTAL DATE ~ ~ 2 ~ 2 ~ ~ 3 HEARING DATE = ~ " ~ ~ ~ 9 y ~,~-
~"
`YLe. 2.
RE®UEST=
sY
PROJECT =
PERTY OR
- ~~
LOCATION OF PRO
JIM JOHNSON P/Z ___ _,_MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z COUNTY HIGHWAY' DISTRICT
ADA
JIM SHEARER, P/Z „
ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION
CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH ,
TIM HEPPER, P/Z NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR. DISTRICT
GRANT KINGSFORO, MAYOR
SETTLERS IRRIGATION`DI5IRICT
RONALD TOLSMA, C/C IDAHO POWER CO (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
BOB CORRIE, C/C
WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
S
U-
BOB GIESLER, C/C
.
.
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
MAX YERRINGTON, C/C BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT.
JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEP1. CITY FILES
BUILDING INSPECTOR OTHER
FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS
POLICE DEPARTMENT
CITY ATTORNEY
GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER
WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER
~i-u
November 23, 1993
Mr. Will Berg
City Clerk
City of Meridian
33 East Idaho Street
Meridian, ID 83642
~, ~. ~,r ~ ~ ~ J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
ENGINEERS•SURVEYORS•PLANNERS
'. ~.i~ ~ f. `.4 i
~- °~ ' .M 250 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201
Boise, ID 83709-0944
C~ s L. > yy _- ~ ~~-~ 208/376-7330
FAX: 208/323-9336
x Y~ ~~~
' '" s
-+./Y(\~
RE: Preliminary Plat for ELK RUN SUBDIVISION NO. 2
(Development Group Property)
The Development Group - Applicant
Dear Mr. Berg:
Enclosed for your review and processing are the necessary documents
as established by the City of Meridian Ordinances for a Preliminary
Plat Application for the above-proposed subdivision. As stipulated
by said ordinance, please find enclosed the following:
1. 30 copies of the Request for Subdivision Approval,
Preliminary Plat Application.
2. 30 copies of Preliminary Plat, 24" x 36", at a scale. of 1"
= 100' (includes Vicinity Map).
3. 30 copies of a reduced Preliminary Plat, 8-1/2" x 11".
4. Four additional copies of the Preliminary Plat, which also
shows the Topography Plan, 24" x 36".
5. One copy of a written legal description of the subject
property.
6. A Property Owners' List within 300 feet of the Elk Run II
property.
The fees for the application were submitted with the annexation
request. Please review the enclosed information and schedule a
Public Hearing for the December Planning & Zoning Meeting. If you
require additional information, please call.
Sincerely,
J-U- ENGINEERS, Inc.
Gary A . Lee , P . E . /L . S . R,~w~~~~'~
Project Manager NOV 2 3 X993
GAL:ls
Enclosures CITY 0~ ~~~~~~~~'~
cc: Bill Hardt, The Development Group
Project No. 18530-02
is
•~ «~
.. .a ,'
rJ-UJ ~~c~~~~~
Engineers Surveyors Planners NOV 2 3 ~9q~
Project. 18530 CIY'~ ~~~' d~:~tE1~I~y~
Date: November 16, 1993
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ELK RUN SUBDIVISION N0. 2
PLAT BOUNDARY
A parcel of land situated in a portion of the NE 1/4, of Section 24, T.3N.,
R.14V., B.M., Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described
as follows:
Lot 4 and Lot 5, Block 1, of Elk Run Subdivision as shown on the official
plat thereof, recorded July 19, 1993, in Book 63 at page 6303, Ada County
Records;
AND
Commencing at a found aluminum cap monumenting the Southeast corner of the
said NE 1/4, of ,Section 24, from which the Northeast corner of said Section 24
bears North 00 37'36" East 2,649.87 feet;
thence along the East-West midsection line of said Section 24 North
89°34'30" West 65.00 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way of South
Meridian Road, the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
thence continuing along said East-West midsection line North 89°34'30" West
72.10 feet;
thence leaving said midsection line North 32°17'30" West 117.99 to a point
on the centerline of the Kennedy Lateral;
thence along the said centerline of the Kennedy Lateral. the following four
courses and distances:
1. North 30°37'30" West 139.10 feet;
2. thence North 41.°08'23" West 989.03 feet, (formerly known as North
41'37" West 1,019.00 feet), to the beginning of a curve;
3. thence along said curve 163.76 feet to the right, said curve having a
central angle of 46°54'45", a radius of 200.00 feet and a long chord
bearing of North 17°41'01" West 159.22 feet (formerly known as North
25'06" West 82.05 feet);
4. thence North 05°46'22" East 39.11 feet, (formerly known as North
04'28" East 86.00 feet, more or less), to the Southwest corner of
said Elk Run Subdivision;
thence leaving said centerline of Kennedy Lateral and along said Southerly
boundary of Elk Run Subdivision South 89°52'45" East 824.61 feet, (formerly known
as North 89'06" East 828.02 feet), to a found 5/8" iron pin and cap marked
P.E./L.S.,3260, monumenting an angle point on said Southerly boundary;
thence continuing along the boundary of said Elk Run Subdivision North
O1°01'15" East 200.00 feet to a found 5/8" iron pin and cap marked P.E./L.S.
326,0;
thence continuing along said boundary South 88°55'45" East 87.74 feet to
the Southeast corner of said Elk Run Subdivision, said point being monumented
with a found 5/8" iron pin and cap marked P.E./L.S. 3260, said point being on the
Westerly right-of-way of said South Meridian Road.
~J.~
Engineers Surveyors Planners
Project: 18530
Date: November 16, 1993
Page: 2 -Description for Elk Run Subdivision No. 2 Plat Boundary
thence along said Westerly right-of-way South 00°37'36" West 1,352.10 feet
to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing an area of 14.25 acres, more or less.
SUBJECT T0:
All existing road right-of-ways and easements of record or appearing on the
above-described parcel of land.
Prepared by:
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
GAL:ls
Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S.
r ~ •
JUB
Engineers Surveyors Planners
Project: 18530
Date: November 16, 1993
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ELK RUN SUBDIVISION N0. 2
R-4 ZONING BOUNDARY
A parcel of land situated in a portion of the NE 1/4, of Section 24, T.3N.,
R.1W., B.M., Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described
as follows:
• Commencing at a found aluminum cap monumenting the Southeast corner of the
said NE 1/4, of Section 24, said corner being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, from
which the Northeast corner of said Section 24 bears North 00°37'36" East 2,649.87
feet;
thence along the East-West midsection line of said Section 24 North
89°34'30" West 137.10 feet;
thence leaving said midsection line North 32°17'30" West 117.99 to a point
on the centerline of the Kennedy Lateral;
thence along the said centerline of the Kennedy Lateral the following four
courses and distances;
1. North 30°37'30" West 139.10 feet;
2. thence North 41°08'23" West 989.03 feet, (formerly known as North
41'37" West 1,019.00 feet), to the beginning of a curve;
3. thence along said curve 163.76 feet to the right, said curve having a
central angle of 46°54'45", a radius of 200.00 feet and a long chord
bearing of North 17°41'01" West 159.22 feet (formerly known as North
25'06" West 82.05 feet);
4. thence North 05°46'22" East 39.11 feet, (formerly known as North
04'28" East 86.00 feet, more or less), to the Southwest corner of Elk
Run Subdivision as it is shown on the official plat thereof, recorded
July 19, 1993, in Book 63 at page 6303, Ada County Records;
thence leaving said centerline of Kennedy Lateral and along the Southerly
boundary of Elk Run Subdivision South 89°52'45" East 978.73 feet, (formerly known
as North 89'06" East), to a point on the Easterly boundary line of said
Section 24;
thence along said Easterly boundary South 00°37'36" west 1,153.92 feet to
the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing an area of 15.58 acres, more or less.
SUBJECT T0:
All existing road right-of-ways and easements of record or appearing on the
above-described parcel of land.
Prepared by:
J-U-B ENGINEERS,- Inc.
GAL:ls
Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S.
l ~ •
~~uB~
Engineers Surveyors Planners
Project: 18530
Date: November 16, 1993
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ELK RUN SUBDIVISION NO. 2
R-8 ZONING BOUNDARY
A parcel of land situated in a portion of the NE 1/4, of Section 24, T.3N.,
R.lW., B.M., Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described
as follows:
Commencing at a found aluminum cap monumenting the Southeast corner of the
said NE 1/4 of Section 24, from which the Northeast corner of said Section 24
bears North 00°37'36" East 2;649.87 feet;
thence along the East-West midsection line of said Section 24 North
00°37'36" East 1,153.92 feet to a point, said point being the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
thence leaving said Easterly boundary North 88°52'45" West 154.12 feet to a
found 5/8" iron pirr and cap marked P.E./L.S. 3260 monumenting the Southeast
corner of Lot 5, Block 1, as it is shown on that certain plat of Elk Run
Subdivision, recorded July 19, 1993, in Book 63 at Page 6303, Ada County Records;
thence along the Easterly boundary of said Lot 5, Block 1, of Elk Run
Subdivision North O1°01'15" East 200.00 feet, to a found 5/8" iron pin and cap
marked P.E./L.S. 3260;
thence along the South boundary of Lot 4, Block 1, of said subdivision
South 88°55'45" East 152.74 feet to a point on the Easterly boundary of said
Section 24;
thence along said boundary South 00°37'36." West 197.45 feet to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing an area of 0.70 acres, more or less.
SUBJECT T0:
All existing road right-of-ways and easements of record or appearing on the
above-described parcel of land.
Prepared by:
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
GAL:ls
Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S.
• •
~~-u
Engineers .Surveyors Planners
ELK RUN II ANNEXATION NARRATIVE
Date: November 23, 1993
Prepared By: Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S.
J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC.
Boise, Idaho
Owner: The Development Group
Developer: The Development Group
Bill Hardt, Director
I. DEVELOPMENT LOCATION
The Elk Run II property is located in a portion of the SE 1/4
of the NE 1/4 of Section 24, Township 3 North, Range 1 West,
B.M., Ada County, Idaho. More particularly, the project lies
west of State Highway 69 (S. Meridian Road and south of Elk
Run Subdivision No. 1).
II. SITE DESCRIPTION
Currently, the site is comprised of approximately 16.28 acres
of irrigated pasture with one single-family home. The Kennedy
Lateral traverses the property from the southeast corner,
westerly and northerly along the southerly and westerly
boundary of the site to the northwest corner. The land is
generally flat with small irrigation ditches throughout, that
water the pasture by flood irrigation methods.
At this time, the property is adjacent to the City of Meridian
corporate limits to the north. The present zoning of the site
is RT within Ada County.
State Highway 69, or South Meridian Road, provides access to
the parcel at three locations on its easterly boundary. The
State of Idaho has acquired right-of-way from the previous
owners and have constructed the present five-lane roadway.
III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The developer plans to request a re-zone of the property to
residential R-4 for property south of Calderwood Street and
R-8 for a small 0.7-acre piece north of Calderwood Street.
The project will consist of approximately 42 single-family
residential lots resulting in a gross density of 2.6 lots per
• •
~~-u-B~
Engineers Surveyors Planners Elk Run II Annexation Narrative
November 23, 1993
Page 2
acre. The lots sizes will conform to the City of Meridian
Zoning Ordinance for residential developments in R-4, and 2
lots in R-8. Also, the development plan includes two lots
that will be identified as common open space lots. These two
lots will be adjacent to Highway 69 consisting of a 10-foot
wide landscaped berm.
This development and zoning are desirable at this location.
The property is situated next to a mix of R-4 and R-8 zoning
to the north.,. There are other residential developments in the
area. Country Terrace Subdivision lies to the east with
Meridian Heights Subdivision to the south of Victory Road.
This zoning request and annexation will comply with the
Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
IV. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
A. Sanitary Sewer System:
There is an existing public sanitary sewer system on Overland
Road just to the north of the project site (extended for Elk
Run No. 1) This system is operated and maintained by the
City of Meridian. This development will extend the existing
sanitary sewer service to and through the site.
B. Domestic Water System:
It is anticipated that domestic water and fire flows will be
supplied by the City of Meridian through the extension of an
existing water system located at the northeast corner of the
site at the intersection of Calderwood and South Meridian
Road.
A new water distribution system will be constructed within the
planned development which will include the necessary fire
hydrants, valves, blow-offs and appurtenances as required by
the State of Idaho Drinking Water Standards.
C. Public Utilities:
This subdivision will include public utilities such as
electrical power from Idaho Power Company; natural gas from
Intermountain Gas Company; telephone service from U.S. West
Communications; and TV service from TCI Cablevision. Utility
easements will be provided upon each lot to accommodate these
public utilities as required.
• •
~~-u-B~
Engineers Surveyors Planners Elk Run II Annexation Narrative
November 23, 1993
Page 3
D. Public Streets:
All streets will be constructed to Ada County Highway District
Standards and Specifications. All streets will be constructed
to Local and Collector Street Standards.
Storm water drainage for these public streets will be
collected and retained on-site in accordance with A.C.H.D.
standards. Disposal of storm water into the natural drainage
will. consist of only flows equal to the pre-development storm
water discharge of the property, (i.e., the amount of storm
water discharged into this drainage will not exceed what is
currently flowing into said drainage ditch in its present
condition)
E. Irrigation and Drainage:
All existing irrigation and drainage ditches that traverse
this site to provide delivery of water or drainage
capabilities to neighboring properties will be maintained.
Other smaller delivery ditches that are required to remain in
service will be relocated and underground conduits installed
as required to maintain delivery of irrigation water or
maintenance of drainageways.
V. FIRE PROTECTION
As mentioned earlier, the domestic water system will be
maintained and operated by the City of Meridian. Part of
their service will include the delivery of adequate fire
protection. The delivery system will be sized and hydrants
placed throughout the development to meet the necessary fire
flows as established by the Meridian Fire District.
.~
~.i uJ
November 23, 1993
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
ENGINEERS•SURVEYORS•PLANNERS
250 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201
Boise, ID 83709-0944
208/376-7330
FAX: 208/323-9336
RE~~~~~~
Mr. Will Berg
City Clerk
City of Meridian
33 East Idaho Street
Meridian, ID 83642
Re: ELK RUN II ANNEXATION/ZONING
The Development Group - Applicant
Dear Mr. Berg:
N O V 2 3 193
CITY (~-= ~~~~~~31AN
Enclosed for your review and processing are the necessary documents
as established by the City of Meridian Ordinances for an
Annexation/Zoning Application. As stipulated by said ordinance,
please find enclosed the following:
1. A copy of Warranty Deed No. 9291317 showing title of the
property vested in The Development Group.
2. A notarized request for the annexation and zoning
amendment from the titled owner (The Development Group).
3. A written legal description of the subject property
showing the total site including the state highway right-
of-way. A written legal description for both the R-4 and
R-8 zone request.
4. One copy of a preliminary plat at a scale of 1" = 100' of
the property to be annexed and subdivided.
5. 30 copies of the Application for Annexation and Zoning to
an R-4 and a small portion of R-8 zone.
6. 30 copies of a Vicinity Map, 8-1/2" x 11", at a scale of.
1" = 300'.
7. A Property Owners' List within 300 feet of the property.
8. A check in the amount of $1,380.97 from The Development
Group for the annexation and preliminary plat application
fee ($400 + $15/acre * 16.28 acres + $300 + $10/lot x 42
lots + $1.29/mailing x 13 mailings).
9. A written narrative prepared by Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. of
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc., describing the annexation request
and the proposed development.
~s
~. «`
~ • •
~~-u-B~
Engineers Surveyors Planners Mr. Will Berg
November 23, 1993
Page 2
Please review the enclosed information and schedule a Public
Hearing for the next available Planning & Zoning Meeting. If you
require additional information, please call.
Sincerely,
J-U- NGINEERS, Inc.
~~~
~~~ ~_
Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S.
Project Manager
GAL:ls
Enclosures
cc: Bill Hardt, The Development Group
Project No. 18530-02
•
~~ WARRANTY DEED 14;l~UUlliy
.. ~` _.
t~ Value lieaale+ed ;,n
R~Z L. ChcYstnrfean and borne htirie CttrisEenss~, huabend and wife,;, ° ' •.
het•irfefter zefszxad t+~ of f;s:afUOr, does hecegy yrartt, bargain, sell, end mtvey
.5~~_ ti.
Davalo~sarttVZt7up, a partners:up y.:„•
;:~'~_~
ha¢elrfett7er tefacsed >n as Grantee, .whose C:asant ftddcees ss -• ~ `,
3704 Gaelic, lakarafiald, C~ 93311 -
_ the folhowl,nQ desrzibad pcentsas, to-wit:
'' ~` sea Attedled Iepnt OesQiptian heclto end aerie a pert hereof. :``~~
~~~~~vE~
~ a V 2 3 1993
T'~ ~~ T+~~i:FiUif~N
9 2 9 1 3 1 7 ~~;~
FlIIC'TAMERiCAN TITLE CO. • .~i .
A,^~ACC~;iY,iJ.~CR~~ ~
J. DAVID N:.YAR1ipI~~~-~~.M Y* ~
~r a ~D;'~.
RECORDER .~+~~r ~~
' ~ '92 OEC 31 P~1 3 48 ~ ~ ~.. ~`~' ~~
~~ .
~ t ~, ~
7C W1tIE MD 1t) FDID tde veld pcemises, with their epptat~fenoes tmtA the e61d .~ ;i
Orantae, his heirs and esaiQts faenn+ar. Ard the said Q'erttOr does he=oby~ ~+enstt -U
to and with the cold Grerttes, that Gaahboe la the owner in for single of said ;,:: ~ _
paeidses; that said prealeee a:4 ices fcan ell erunbrenoae aoroept cSfrcant yaws
tefees, levies, end a~feasenertb, erd aoaCSpt U. S. Petaa,t zeeeivetiane. testrletione.
eeewonb Of c'oooed, and eoerasstes visible upoi the ptenisea, erd that G'rontnr will
wecssrt e!d drrfratd the gene flan all elalAS whets~ier.
Dead: Qe~erbs! ?O . 1992.
~~
M~bru't L. Chrlfransrst Wiro MRric Chflaten9dt
SP117E Cf IDNIO
1...
trs
C[)LJ<V1Y OF' Adn )
Cn 'lhia Jat.dey of Qeosnipr, to tJn •~nr t992, trtorr nr., i "bG~ry tVbllc
>n ~! for sefd StebP, psr!vrflly app~etsl {IOUPrt L. (lvistar~n aril 117rna MetJt
Chtistsnsvi, Itt~wn or idrntlfiesl to an tt+ is tlr pt~.rnone whir Hants are eu:a?117ed
tD the within IngtzVie+t, ad adatrlEdgeel tc ne that ttr~ mrervted the enc.
a.,ql,. 1`~~.. ~
Notery~~bllc~ [vr ld~~
Itwfdirp at iblr~, IdNv
ctfnnirwfen D~:row: ti6;gn
J
Anterira~i Title Company of
i ~
~~~~~v~~
`. -`. ~_ ''
~ • - h
'
` NOV ?_ 3 X993
_
1
~
• t _ ~
Z. _
g~y,g App
yY' /~t4..~lY~iJ21'1
CITE' 'i
,
249:001119
'- :.
~;
-
~
r.
-
;h
r. ~ r~
.. _ .~,.
BEGINNING at a point South 1298.50 !wt along the Section line lrc~ .
the NortMaat~Cornar~ o! Section 23, Township 3 North, Rsrx~e 1 INSt, .~ `
Boise, Masi~lan,~-de~County, Idaho, and running thenq -
Soutt~ alongtlfa Saotion? liaa 11337. ~ lwt, more or: lue to the tart=• = • ', ,
Quarter.;~tsfalk'Ol~sald~:BeCtionc28f,. thence - ~ _ ..,;:y''F~ 4.
Se+~:clf 89.31'F-Mast along'tM East lleeti'iild-section line 137.10 teatt .~
,~ 7 .'~~ ..... _
thence ,,es~> • ~ ~,." Fi~'°o,'j"~"c. .,
~
a canals thence ~-
North 33.02' Mist 117:y9 fwt-~to~thi`center f
North 31.22' Meat 139.10 !wt aic'+~+ thccentaro! the canal; thence
North 31.37' Meet 1019.00 !wt aas"1,%>th~kcenter o! wid canal,
thence - ~ _._., ..~.:- ,~
'
~
'
tar-oi the canal; thence
Meet 82.05 iwt alonp
tM
North 25.06
North 3.28' Sast 86 fwt, more or lwst.;rlonq the linter of the '
canal to the Southwest corner of LavoM=R. Dsvenport property _
as described in Deed recorded se Instrument No.,~~ioAS,:
records o! 11de County, Idaho; thence ~ r' -
North 89.06' East 828.02 lwt; thence s~.
North 200 lwt; thence ti
East 150 fNt TO TNt PWCE OF BEGINNING. -•~ <
EXCEPT ditch end load rights-ot-way. '-
~
~
- r- • `~. - "' ~.
EXCEPT right-ol-way .tor KENNEDY WTERAL. , ~
c
:.~-'~~
EXCEPT right-oi-way Lor State Highway No. 69, also known a
Meridian Road.
f
RECEIVED
IdOV 2 3 1993
A.NN1akATIONi7,Oi~'ItiG ~Oi~'ES'1' A.~I,IDA~'TT
ci ~ ~~~ 0~= ~y,~~~~~aN
We, Tlie De~~elrap:ment Group, do hereb;~ certify ghat t.~~e are the record owners of the Land.
descril~ed as the "Elk Run Ll Property" in r applicati~!n fur .Annexation & 7..eryirtg and a
Preliminary Plat Application being subrcut~ied to the City of Meridian for consrderatior!.
~Ve further state that we hereby officially request annexation of said property into the Corporate
City r_amits of the City of Meridian, Idaho.
~Tve also ackno~~~ledge that ~*~e tivill be responsible frjr ti7e payrx-ent of all costs incurred by the
City in pracessin~ the Annexatir~n,'Zonir~g Applicatiar~, including city engineering posts,
put~licaion casts, and attorney's costs and fees.
In. ;addition, we hereby state and. certify that tlt~ subjGt property will be posted one week beform
fire i~ublic hearing slating that the above-m~rttioned applicat.iur~s wit!i the City of I~leridian have
been made.
Dated this 22
By:
day of _ November
~.l.~vC.. C~It.C.LC <L.,
The Development Group
Title
STATE OF emQ~~J
ss.
County of C(~ )
{Jfv~ THIS _~__a .clay of
State, personally appeared
19 93
19'3 before me a n;~tary public in and for said
kac~vn to me to be the persurt(s} «•hose name(s) is {arc:) subscribed to the within irstntment, ar-d.
arknocvledged to me that ~e.e~ executed the same.
Ii\T ~'VI'TI~TESS Vb'IiEI}.EOF, I ha~~~ hereunto set my Ela~td and affixed my official seal the
day and year first above written.
Niy Notary Coz~amission Expires ~ol 9
A1y Notary Band Expires 19
_. _..s.eTl=~ ~-, ,v~.J - .tee
Notary Public for Idaho
Residing at~~~2.~r~it~. ~f~•
•~ ~ ' , , ( •
APPLIATION FOR ANNEXATION APPROVAL &
ZONING OR REZONE '
MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FILING INFORMATION
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
Elk Run Subdivision No. 2
(PROPOSED NAME OF SUBDIVISION)
Highway 69, south of Elk Run Subdivision No. 1
(GENERAL LOCATION)
See attached
(LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ATTACH IF LENGTHY)
The Development Group 887-5622
(OWNER(S) OF RECORD) (NAME) (TELEPHONE N0.)
1895 S. Meridian Road, peridian, Idaho 83642
(ADDRESS)
The Development Group 887-5622
(APPLICANT) (NAME) (TELEPHONE N0.)
1895 S. Meridian Road, peridian, Idaho 83642
(ADDRESS)
Gary A. Lee, P.E./L.S. - J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 376-7330
(ENGINEER, SURVEYOR OR PLANNER) (NAME) (TELEPHONE N0.)
250 S. Beechwood Avenue, Boise, Idaho 83709
(ADDRESS)
City of Meridian, Idaho
(JURISDICTION{S) REQUIRING APPROVAL)
Single-family residential, R-4 requested with a 0.70-acre of R-8
(TYPE OF SUBDIVISION - RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL)
+50 16.28 ACRES OF LAND IN CONTIGUOUS
$644.20
OWNERSHIP . (FEE)
(ACCEPTED BY:)
'~ ,
~_ a~e•g
i
I
• ~
_ ~ 1"
q S
~~ -. •.~o
e
BLOCK 1S
1
20 i
t•
10
13
n
~ _ ~0~
,z
r ~ "~" 0 ~ S
~cp~
-~~ ~.
~
~ ~
~ • ? `.
,3-I~
i3 i2 tl
1 ~ ~
~~ _ _1 1_,
W. CAVENP^F' OR _
1
~S ~ 28 : T ~ ~ 11 i3~ ~
••
X16
29 2b~~ ~ IS
. ,a
12
4,
at
17 a
' I~ i
g
uJ ~ 23 r
~ ~ ~ -- ~
• :i ~+ > ~T
•9 W ~
G ~ 9 t
- - - -
~ 32 23 ~S ~ 9 ~ - • .
~• ~ •
33 22 a 7 g~OGC 3
I~
N O34 21
S 4 •.
`
2G 6
t
Sd zs ri m e , s
33 v;,
~! ~
W ~
d~
ma 2~ i 7 2
S ~ 3
y,
32 ~0` Z~ ~
~ 6 ~
>D
~ ~
BLOCC Z3 ~ ~ ~
.
3t ~
27 UNAYm SiRFE
1B 17 T ~
7 _ i '
~ CCLGT ~
~ I ~~
4
K, E. ( i~~ ~ O Y
i ~
~- /L ~- 2 '~ ~_
~W
i
I
I ..3 ~~, 5
i
`~ ~ g
t
REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL
PRELIMINARY PLAT AHD/OR FINAL PLAT
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
TIME TABLE FOR SUBMISSION:
A request for preliminary plat approval must be in the City
Clerks possession no later than three days following the
•regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear the request at
the monthly meeting folloring the month the request was
made.
After a proposal enters the process it may be acted upon at
subsequent monthly meetings provided the nec~asary
procedures and documentation are received before 5:00 P. M.,
Thursday following the Planning and Zoning Commission
action.
GENERAL INFORMATION Elk Run Subdivision No. 2
Elk Run II Annexation
1. Name of Annexation and Subdi vision.
2. General Location, Highway 69, south of Elk Run No. 1
3. Owners of record, The Development Group
1895 S. Mari an
Address, Meridian, ID , Zip 83642 Telephone 887-5622
4. Applicant, The Development Group Address, same
5. Engineer, Gary A. Lee, P . E . /L . S . Firm J-U-B ENGINEERS , Inc .
Address 250 S. Beachwood Avenue , Zip 83709 Telephone 376-7330
Boise, ID
6. Name and address to receive City billings: Name Bill Hardt,
The DPtrol n~ mant r_.-n„pAddress same Telephone 887-5622
PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST: Subd ivision Features
1. Acres 16.28 ac
2. Number of lots 42
3. Lots per acre 2.6
4. Density per acre 2.6
5. Zoning Classif ication t s ) R-4 and 0.7 acre of R-8 requested
+ • •
6. If the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridian City
Limits but within the ~urisdictiona~ mile, what is the
existing zoning classification RT n county
7. Does the plat border a potential green belt No
E!. Have recreational easements been provided for No
9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City No
Explain
10. Are there proposed dedications of common areas? Yes
Explain 10'' landscaped berms along Hwy 69
For future parks? No Explain
Meridian Mi die an
11. What school (s ) service the area High School do you
propose any agreements for future school sites No
Explain
12. Other proposed amenities to the City None Water Supply
Citv of Meridian Fire Department City of Meridian Other Sewer -
c;rV of MPrir~ian Explain
13. Type of Building (Residential, Commercial, Industrial or
combination ) Residential
14. Type of Dwe~l~n~gt~) Single Family, Duplexes, Multiplexes,
other Sing e- a i y
15. Proposed Development features:
8,000 SF in R-4
a. Minimum square f ootage of lot (s) , 6,500 SF in R-8 (2 lots)
1,400 SF in R-4
b. Minimum square footage of structure (s ) 1_,350 SF in R-8
c. Are garages provides for, Yes square footage 4-_
d. Are other coverings provided for some patios
e. Landscaping has been provided for Yes Describe
Landscaped berm along Hwy 69
c2)
i
C~
•
f. Trees will be provided for on to sTrees will be
maintained by lot owners
g. Sprinkler systems are provided for on lots
h. Are there multiple units No Type
remarks
i. Are there special set hack requirements No
Explain
j. Has off street parking been provided for Yes .Explain
Two per lot in driveways
k. Value range of property S85.000 - $125.000
1. Type of f financing f or development FHA, VA, Conventional
m. Protective covenants were submitted No . Date same as Phase I
16. Does the proposal land lock other property NO
Does it create Enclaves No
STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE:
1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be constructed
to standards as required Dy Ada County Highway District and
Meridian Qrdinance. Dimensions will be determined by the
City Engineer. All sidewalks rill be five (5) feet in
width.
~. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian
Comprehensive Plan.
3. Development rill connect to City services.
4. Development rill comply with City Ordinances.
5. Preliminary Plat-rill include all appropriate easements.
6. Street names must not conflict with City grid system.
c3)
J
~_ !R
!~ by
~~ ~~
,~
F~
u
u~;
W~
~~ p~
~~~ VG
_ t ~'
~ 1
s
i ~ k
~~ ~~
;~d f~ ~
~~~~~~~~r~~~~
~~
i~~~~~°~~R!~
~~1~
i . ~
;~i 1~ i~ i=1=j i~ ~,1 j +~ ii
]j'
0
Z i~; ~~, ~~~ ~;~~~~ ~~ ~~~; ~ ;~ ~~ 1,
~b~ i1~ i~~ a1:~23 :~a ~~~I ] ~~ ~8 .~
s
a -
k
a a ~ a~
R:a?~ ly~g~i
~~~~f ~e~~l~~
z---+~-~-s -
w, "~ ,, 'II Cl
1l~F
I '
~
' - 3t
b `
~
^
i
~ Tnyvy ~-~~a
IR
~
~
g
i
I
~
t
\ 1
I~
' I
1 _IIllj •~WI
_II
^~~Y~ I
1
1
I
'KMY 7a
1 lr Wllq
1
_ n
a
~
~ ~ -
~~
~.~,. o ~.
...~
---
u V
N AR
to 3p
;,~ ~3
' ~<
~q;q
~O
W
A~
C
~~I °$
_s
c
41
n y
= 2~9
t~ V
S y~; W
'~~ m
~z~ ~
~ ~~
~ m
11~,
3
O
~s
C e
V1 s§ ~
N ~
d
o v 2 ~~
a. ~ ~ ~ Z j~
!p ~p _ ~ i lp 2p S -tl~
~~ ~~ 3 ~ ~ ~ Z ~ t ~~ ~F ~ ~t! m ~
~, ~~
n~ F> F~
~ U; i tl<
~ ~ t ~• ~ ; 4
_ .: _ 7
k -
's ti
+~ ~ 3 ~~
~~~l~~ ~~~~~~
2-~~ -
1
. .,,,,
-1- _ ~ qy~
~y~a ~ u~ aYai . ~
~ t ~ 1 ~
1 ' ~ y
f. e
^^ ~ ~
L
~ ~ ~ w~s"ss~'n~+- ~ ' ~ - x~ ~~ -~~'' as a
.,+ ~;.~
s ~ ~ ;~" %~
:. _
- ~ R
I ~'~ ~ N~
a . ~ . ~
~ ~ r • -~ a a
~ "'° ~T .:
*'+otn ~ I~
A e
mown
4
a~^gs' '1
te~a{{ y~- {yp~ ~
Up~yO~~ 'u pl 1 '~ 11YIDIOFMIIp
_ O ~~ S
R
•
,,,
' al ._
~~
i--1
§~ ~
s~
5
t;tX
dj
d
:a
~<
v
~;
r~
~~ ~~
.~
~~~ f`
~~~ VC
. -L ~~
~ ~~
} ~i
7 i :
~ 3~ ~i
~3~ ~: ~i
~~~i~I~at~1~
~ ~ ~ ~ iI,
~~ i. j ~ p. ~ :a I
~ 4 ; I ~
~ ! ]j ~ t ,•
~ ~ .,
t t~ t ~ ,,
~'~ fir, #'~;2~~i~~~t ~~( ~~~ ~ ~~;~ ~~
~b~ s~i ,i~ ii':l11 :ii ~j~l ~ ~~ 38 ~!
r . • . ~ • !
a
A
a s ~ j~
=s ate` «8 't'
~t3:e`~ 4a~
8_-~
p
2 ~.-~-~
(NL ~Y~1~1 YYI~`
-
g
!
~~~ '
ji
uM y
,. ~n ~1~
T ,y
~
w7 '~ IY `N Cl 1rW s
(
( _ ciao '
i .,~ ~.
~!
~
Y I r~
pI
] ( ~ '
R
5@ ( L
y
i
_ I
` '
`y
~ _
~
~• (
I R
wry aa~~us
•
^ ~
~
~
!! i
S_b (
~ i
R ~ ; ~
~fi
I ~- aan~ wne~ ~T
1 ~
mu.,rn
OIrY~ ~ jj17
r wou~ wis
i~L.~. swu
u
~ •r
H~ ~y
!8 jj8
~~ 3~
F>
~3
~~
u
;~~ i~
~~~ ~
r~ ~~
~~~ ~ ~ '~
_ ~ •I w ~ ~
. ^ ~ . ^ •
j ! j „ i ! A
j lj~~ a
•
j t
r ~' ~.
4T
---..~__ $ - a ~ ~ ~
- - - .-<
a ., ..
*~., .Qa,m, j f - ~ f_...
.n,.'S.,- ..
~..,..~
.-
a
i~;a=~
~~~~~~
i
z
j ::e~~:
!~' is
'' , : ` j'
:• „
`~~ is gg
~ .. .~ E
.. • ,D,
~~¢'~
::" Y`
'~~
L
W
V
0
c~
e
nr~~ ~ N ~
1~. ~
q
~ ~ d'Z~~
nr v r ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ O
p ~ ~ ~ ~ f '• ?~ A isyy W~~ d
f ~ !F !i ~ 1 l0 lp s ~~i m
•-
~~~i 3~a ~~f~~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~'°~ ~
' °!
r p;
3
a . ~ ~ t 2W,
w- ~ 1; i~ III 1~ ~!~ 1 1 ~3 : ~~b a~ ..a o<
~ ~ ~~i ~ ~ : iii ~ ~ w:L F
'I~i ~~~ ~# ;11•:1:i =~s !i!t ~ ~~ ~s ~i
~,
_ i
B x y sa
~gi.gc= !s .~~
• ~~ %$
2 - a83~~~~ s~~8~~~
^'" 1
`
1 ewva ~
^I~ ~aa~ i~n~ ~°w ' ~i~L~~ o-~ ~P" ~ ~ ~ * '~ ~ i
1 i
~ - ..i::' Ari~~
~ ~ ~ air ~ + , - z~ - !. ~~`
• -
`'~ ~ - - -
t 1 R
i I ~-y .s_o ~~s - - ~
- ' + ! ~
~ ~
I
t ( ~~ « •~ -
Ij ~ I~ i a
1 ~ ~ •
i 1 ~ ~ • ~
~~r:1 I ~mn, _
' ' i ,,
~r ~ ' ~ ~
*'+ow~y
- A ~ le
mitY1~ 4
E~~ai`, 3
i :-t~
~~~~~ ~3T 9l 7 ~ 'd MIAOFyMO
7.
f ~ ~~ 5
~~
~~ ~ ~ J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
~~ • ~ ~ B , RECEIVED ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS
J 250 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201
Boise, ID 83709-0944
~~~~ 208/376-7330
FAX: 208/323-9336
CITY OF MERIDIAN
January 4, 1994
Mr. Will Berg, City Clerk
City of Meridian
33 E. Idaho Street
Meridian, ID 83642
Dear Will:
Re: ELK RUN NO. 2 SUBDIVISION
Revised Preliminary Plat
Ada County Highway District has reviewed the Preliminary Plat. for
Elk Run No. 2 Subdivision and have suggested two modifications to
the plat, which we and the developer concur with. The first item is
to re-configure the lot design between South Covey Avenue and South
Riptide Place to eliminate Lot 7 from fronting onto West Calderwood
Street, which will be a Collector Street. The second item is to add
a second stub street to the southwest boundary at the end of South
Covey Avenue.
Enclosed for your review and comment are ten copies of the revised
preliminary plat showing the recommended modifications reduced to
8-1/2" x it". I will also forward a copy of this modified plan to
the City Engineer. If you have any questions, please call.
Sincerely,
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
~~~^
Gary Lee, P.E./L.S.
Project Manager
GAL:ls
Enclosure
cc: Bill Hardt, The Development Group
Project No. 18530
is
1. «~
LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET
OF ELK RUN SUBDIVISION N0. 2
Queenland Acres, Inc.
c/o Carol Lotspeich
1032 Cayman Dr.
Meridian, ID 83642
Erna I. Tomlin, Trustee
2475 S. Meridian
Meridian, ID 83642
Running Brook Estates, Inc.
P.O. Box 6525
Boise, ID 83707
Sylvia S. Johnson
2020 S. Meridian
Meridian, ID 83642
Wilford H. III- & Barbara Ann Fawcett
2090 S. Meridian
Meridian, ID 83642
Leonard D. Reed
2240 S. Meridian
Meridian, ID 83642
Jose I. & Janice E. Larrea
100 Rosalyn Circle
Meridian, ID 83642
William O. & Jean L. Aaron
2435 S. Meridian
Meridian, ID 83642.
Jack R. & Carolyn G. Siemsen
2190 S. Meridian
Meridian, ID 83642
Harrell A. & Melba Thorne
1941 S. Covey Place
Meridian, ID 83642
Randall Hopkins
1921 S. Riptide
Meridian, ID 83642
Ralph K. & Susan A. Rice
1929 S. Covey Place
Meridian, ID 83642
Karl T. & Nona L. Galloway
2020 South Riptide
Meridian, ID 83642
~~
SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET DEC 2 2 ~~.~3
C~1"ll ~r ~'~ ~~~a ~~~.~'J
Proposed Development Name ELK RUN SUB N0. 2 City MERIDIAN
Date Reviewed 1209/93 Preliminary Stage R3000C Final
Engineer/Developer J-II-B Engr. / Davenport ~ Development Group
The following SUBDIVISION NAME is approved by the Ada County Engineer or his
designee per the requirements of the IDAHO STATE CODE
G,
ELK RUN SUBDIVISION N0. 2 __ R. ~ ' Date /L 3
The Street name comments listed below are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY
STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this
development in accordance with the Meridian City Street Name Ordinance.
The following existintt street names shall appear on the ylat as:
"VEST OVERLAND ROAD"
"EAST OVERLAND ROAD"
"SOUTH MERIDIAN ROAD STATE HIGHWAY 69"
"V. CALDERVOOD STREET"
"SOUTH RIPTIDE AVENUE"
"SOUTH COVEY PLACE"
"SOUTH GULL COVE AVENUE"
The following new street name is approved and-shall appear on the plat as:
"VEST UNAMED STREET" __
The above street name comments have been read and approved by the following
agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the
signatures must be secured by the representative or his designee in order for the
street names to be officially approvp~-
ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COM1iIT?El
Ada County Engineer Sohn Prieste
Ada Planning Assoc.
Meridian Fire Dept.
Terri Raynor
~ DESIGNEES
Date ,~~1
'l
Date
Representative Date
NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet must be presented to the Ada County
Engineer at the tiie of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be
signed ll!! Sub Indez Street Index
NUMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS ~ /1G`~~ ~'~ ~ T~ ~Cl~ J ~~~11 T~~INt ~(t~~C[»r~k,~
rC- 34 ~~-•--) GkLtv«~ ~olL' ~j ~~ 3 ( /ice
~ ~ `~~L/q/y3
w~
;! - ~ ~ _
t
~S ~
~ I
1 ~ ~
~ ~
,~ r2 r
1 _~
,~ - -1 - - 1
w. CavENV^F' oR
1 • ~ ~• a T
1i 29 tt~~ .r M! ~= j gar OR
~° IW ~~
'' W SO 21 r' ~ 6 ~ _
}~ ~0 ~~.
W ~ S ~~
V
~S ~ 32 27 ' ~ i_ t
1 ~~ ¢a » zz
'i
~ ~ IN' O 34 21 2v ~ 6 7~ I j
J 1
' » r ~+ ' ' ~
~~ u ~ ~
~~ a Y r S Y a
I
o s
4 ~• ~$ ~ •
~o ~
su~oc u
„ u ur+~ts sn~¢' ~~ ' 1
,. „
_ _.
N ~ ,. ,.
.~. ,s
20
i•
i
~ i ~0
I
1] ~
~~
i ~ ~ s 3~~
I
1
_ - -- -._ - -- - - l
t
,_.
• r
RT
' v
~~p~"ONUS
~c ~
--~a~. ----- .-- -
_- ~~ T ~ _
\ 1
4
. ~ K, ~ ~ ,V e.. C -•
L- /~. ~- C ~ ~ ._
1
' J~ '~ 5
•
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the
City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the
City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at
the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian,Idaho, at
the hour of 7:30 p.m., on March 1, 1994, for the purpose of
reviewing and considering the Application of The Development Group
for annexation and zoning of approximately 16.28 acres of land
located in the Section 24, T. 3N, R. 1W, Boise-Meridian, Ada
County, Idaho, and which property is generally located on Highway
69, south of Elk Run Subdivision No. 1. The Application requests
annexation with zoning of R-4.
Further Applicant requests Preliminary Plat approval of the
parcel of land above described for 42 single family dwelling lots
for Elk Run Subdivision No. 2.
A more particular legal description of the above property is
on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East
Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular
business hours.
A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and
all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and
the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony.
Dated this 9th day of Febr ary 1994.
i
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., Y LERK
• •
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE I5 HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the
City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the
Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a
public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street,
Meridian,Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., on January 11, 1994, for
the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of The
Development Group for annexation and zoning of approximately 16.28
acres of land located in the Section 24, T. 3N, R. iW, Boise-
Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is generally
located on Highway 69, south of Elk Run Subdivision No. 1. The
Application requests annexation with zoning of R-4.
Further Applicant requests Preliminary Plat approval of the
parcel of land above described for 42 single family dwelling lots
for Elk Run Subdivision No. 2.
A more particular legal description of the above property is
on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East
Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular
business hours.
A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and
all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and
the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony.
Dated this 23 day of December 1993.
_ ~ i
WILLIAM G. BERG, J ., CITY CLERK
. ~,: .. ~ _
~. ~- .. _
AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 635 5 C i J
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN 1~i~~P~IlJ6"~zNO ~;~-~~v~..iv~,.~
AN AMENDED
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS ~ ~-~'~'.~CEI._! Off' ~ ~ T.D~ND
SITUATED IN A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4, OF SECTION 24, T.3N., R.1W.,
B.M. , MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING ANcEEEECTZ-VE DATE_.-- ~-
WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of
Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of
said City to annex to the said City real property which is
described in Section 1 below:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City
Council of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho:
Section 1. That the real property described as:
PARCEL ONE
A parcel of land situated in a portion of the NE 1/4, of
Section 24, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., Meridian, Ada County,
Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at a found aluminum cap monumenting the
Southeast corner of the said NE 1/4 of Section 24, said
corner being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, from which the
Northeast corner of said Section 24 bears North 00°37'36"
East 2,649.87 feet;
thence, along the East-West midsection line of said
Section 24 North 89°34'30" West 137.10 feet;
thence leaving said midsection line North 32°17'30" West
117.99 to a point on the centerline of the Kennedy
Lateral;
thence along the said centerline of the Kennedy Lateral
the following four courses and distances;
1. North 30°37'30" West 139.10 feet;
2. thence North 41°08'23" West 989.03 feet, (formerly
known as North 41'37" West 1,019.00 feet), to the
beginning of a curve;
AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - ELK RUN 2 Page 1
•
3. thence along said curve 163.76 feet to the right,
said curve having a central angle of 46°54'45", a
radius of 200.00 feet and a long chord bearing of
North 17°41'01" West 159.22 feet (formerly known as
North 25'06" West 82.05 feet);
4. thence North 05°46'22" East 39.11 feet, (formerly
known as North 04'28" East 86.00 feet, more or
less), to the Southwest corner of Elk Run
Subdivision as it is shown on the official plat
thereof, recorded July 19, 1993, in Book 63 at page
6303, Ada County Records;
thence leaving said centerline of Kennedy Lateral and
along the Southerly boundary of Elk Run Subdivision South
89°52'45" East 978.73 feet, (formerly known as North
89' 06" East) , to a point on the Easterly boundary line of
said Section 24;
thence along said Easterly boundary South 00°37'36" West
1,153.92 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
AND
PARCEL TWO ~.
A parcel of land situated in a portion of the NE 1/4, of
Section 24, T.3N., R.1W., B.M., Meridian, Ada County,
Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at a found aluminum cap monumenting the
Southeast corner of the said NE 1/4 of Section 24, from
which the Northeast corner of said Section 24 bears North
00°37'36" East 2,649.87 feet;
thence along the East-West midsection line of said
Section 24 North 00°37'36" East 1,153.92 feet to a point,
said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
thence leaving said Easterly boundary North 89°52'45"
West 154.12 feet to a found 5/8" iron pin and cap marked
P.E./L.S. 3260 monumenting the Southeast corner of Lot 5,
Block 1, as it is shown on that certain plat of Elk Run
Subdivision, recorded July 19, 1993, in Book 63 at Page
6303, Ada County Records;
thence along the Easterly boundary of said Lot 5, Block
1, of Elk Run Subdivision North O1°01'15" East 200.00
feet, to a found 5/8" iron pin and cap marked P.E./L.S.
3260;
AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - ELK RUN 2 Page 2
•
thence along the South boundary of Lot 4, Block 1, of
said subdivision South 88°55'45" East 152.74 feet to a
point on the Easterly boundary of said Section 24;
thence along said boundary South 00°37'36" West 197.45
feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
are hereby annexed to the City of Meridian; that PARCEL ONE is be
R-4 Residential; that PARCEL TWO is zoned R-8 Residential; that the
annexation and zoning is subject to the conditions referenced in
the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as adopted by the
Meridian Council on the request for annexation and zoning.
Section 2. That the property shall be subject to de-
annexation if the owner shall not meet the following requirements:
a. That the Applicant will be required to connect to
Meridian water and sewer and resolve how the water and
sewer mains will serve the land.
b. That the development of the property shall be subject to
and controlled by the Subdivision and Development
Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan adopted
January 4, 1994.
c. That, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall
be required to enter into a development agreement as
authorized by 11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the
development agreement shall address inclusion into the
subdivision of the requirements of 11-9-605 C. G., H 2,
K, L of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City
of Meridian.
d. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply
with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in
particular Section 11-9-616, which pertains to
development time schedules and requirements, and 11-9-605
M. which pertains to the tiling of ditches and waterways.
e. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind
the applicant, the titled owners, and their assigns.
f. That if these conditions of approval are not met the
property shall be subject to de-annexation.
g. Meet the requirements and conditions of the Findings of
Fact and Conclusions of Law.
AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - ELK RUN 2 Page 3
Section 3. That if Applicant shall fail to meet the above
conditions the property shall be subject to de-annexation, which
conditions subsequent shall run with land and also be personal to
the owner and Applicant.
Section 4 . That the City Clerk shall cause one (1) copy of
the legal description, and map, which shall plainly and clearly
designate the boundaries of said property, to be filed with the Ada
County Recorder, Ada County Assessor, and the State Tax Commission
within ten (10) days following the effective date of this Amended
Ordinance.
Section 5. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency,
which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Amended Ordinance
shall be in full force sand effect from and after its passage and
approval as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the
City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this ,~ ~' day of
~Qe ~h^- 6 e V , 19 9 4.
APPROVED:.
MAYOR -- GRAN.T._P . KI R
ATTEST:
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. - ITY CLERK
AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - ELK RUN 2
r ~~~
'~ ~
~~`~~ c ~+ ~ ~~
Page 4
•
STATE OF IDAHO,)
ss.
County of Ada, )
I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian,
Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true, full and correct copy of an Amended Ordinance entitled
"AN AMENDED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ANNEXING AND ZONING
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PARCEL OF LAND
SITUATED IN A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4, OF SECTION 24, T.3N., R.1W.,
B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE", passed as Amended Ordinance No. 635 by the City Council
and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the 6 t<<- day of _
~~«~, FjQf- 1994, as the same appears in my
office.
DATED this ~~r day of
_~~ ~
~~~~ ~ 6~. bah
~ ~ vo ~t+,~"~
0
~ ~°
STATE OF ID~;~i~~ `~~,,~ ~ ~ ~`~~
County of Ada'~;:;~~'~s,~~,~, a ~ ~ ti
1994.
~~~~~~~~' =--- J`''am
City Clerk, City of Meridian
Ada County, Idaho
On this ~_~~d'a of ~ ee ~e ~ 6 er , 1994 , before
me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State,
personally appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. known to me to be the
person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my
official seal the day and year in this certificate first above
written.
,'911110111-IIII
~~~ ~ ~~~^°b ~,~~
SEAL ` ~ 1" SOT ~~y ~~
:~ ~,~a
1I111.~1
t ry Public for Ida
iding at Meridian,
1„ GpnrMiSSiOn edrir~'S
Idaho
dB~o~J99
AMENDED ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - ELK RUN 2 Page 5
,2 T.3N,R.~/ICY
SEC ~jj
~~
52
.wMF~4 ~ :.. ^ f M 12 W X00
'V~~' ! .
t"
5 2 pyJpO
e E by ''
o~
1
i
son RES~pI
couNrr u
~~.
N.E. CORNER
SEQ. Y~ .
J.L
10.00
IOL00 f'Otp~
I
I ~ S.l~i°x'45"E.9'18.13' 1
~~`~.
~'°'? OIe~IN~ 1~10.1s35
~•Y- ~ ~
/9 Z/~ Z s
~~ Sr,4 t~~2GE1-lVt9 1
. ~
~~;. ~~
' 9`Q9
~~ °3
8
. i,, ~ r ~
y
Vii.
-.i
19~9ao ~
~tioo
~i~o
ry/~1'N•M ~A
13 1 2 I I 10 8 8 T 6 5 4
2
14 R ~ W pAVENPORT DR. ~ ~'~ 3
15 ~' 28 2T ~' . 14 13 d 2
16 29 .26 ~ 15 t2 ~ w+av
IT
30 •
25 }
16 11 ~ 2
~
~
' 10 •~ 3
18 Q 31 24 ~ IT ~
vi 9 4
19 C 32 23 1 8 H g,
d E•~j s•ra
20 Q: 33 Y2 ig T ~.
21 a 34 21 20 6 5 iS
z IF
V~ 1
.N
N,
.IR
'.!52.141
~- {~AIz.EL 2.
ice, iz
•
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: MARCH 1. 1994
APPLICANT: DEVELOPMENT GROUP AND AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 11
-n1B ENGINEERS
REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONIN WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT F R
ELK RUN SUBDIVISION #2
EN Y COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY EINGINEER: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
CITY ATTORNEY: FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CITY POLICE DEPT: "REVIEWED"
CITY FIRE DEPT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
CITY BUILDING DEPT: n
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS N ~
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: a ~~
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
~l~~~l~
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY •
OFFICIALS
A Good Place to Live
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk
S
W
CITY OF MERIDIAN
GARY D. SM TH
P.EyCity Eng
eer
BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt.
JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste water supt. 33 EAST IDAHO
KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief
" MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
W.L. "BILL
GORDON, Police Chie(
WAYNE G. GROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887813
Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211
GRANT P. KINGSFORD
Mayor
MEMORANDUM January 8, 1994
TO; MAYOR, COUNCIL, PLANK G & ZONING
r
FROM; Gary D. Smith, PE
RE; ELK RUN SUBD. N0.2
(Annexation, Zoning, Preliminary Plat)
COUNCIL MEMBERS
RONALD R. TOLSMA
MAX YERRINGTON
ROBERT D. CORRIE
WALT W. MORROW
WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP
Planner & Zoning Administrator
JIM JOHNSON
Chairman • Planning 8 Zoning
I have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments for
your information and consideration as conditions of the applicant
during the hearing process:
1. The proposed subdivision is adjacent to an existing city limit
boundary..
2. Submit street name approval from Ada County.
3. Sanitary sewer line needs to extended along S.H. 69 from Lot
12-Block 4 to the south boundary.
4. Some relocation of the street lights and fire hydrants shown
may be necessary.
5. An all-weather surface needs to be provided over the sewer line
exiting So. Gull Cove Pl. to Hwy. 69. The 20 foot easement shall
be changed to a fenced common are lot to preclude any other use.
A removable type barrier shall be installed to prevent general
vehicle access.
6. What is the piping status of the Kennedy Lateral?
7. What information is available regarding the depth to the
highest seasonal groundwater elevation on this property?
8. Show the referenced benchmark for the contours shown.
9. A temporary turn-a-round should be built at the south end of So.
Covey Ave.
10. A part of the subdivision area shown north of W. Calderwood
St. is a resubdivision of Lots 4,5-Block 1, Elk Run Subd. No.1.
11. A policy decision question exists concerning extension of the
city water line along the east side of Hwy. 69. This needs to be
•
addressed by the City Council.
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk
JANICE L. GASS, City Treasurer
GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer
BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt.
JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt.
KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief
W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief
WAYNE G. GROOKSTON, JR., Attorney
OFFICIALS
GRANT P. KINGSFORD
Mayor
MEMORANDUM
To: Planning & Zoning Commission,
Mayor and City Council
~~
RE: ANNEXATION TO R-4 ZONING WITH PRELIMINARY PLAT
FOR ELK RUN SUBDIVISION NO. 2
From: Wayne S. Forrey, Planning Direc~~~j,
Date: January 6, 1994
This annexation and zoning and preliminary plat request
complies with the Comprehensive Plan and the overall development
concept for this portion of the City.
The 35 foot irrigation easement shown on the plat can be
reduced to 20'because this section of the Kennedy Lateral must be
piped by the developer. The developer should also extend the
Meridian Road sewer trunk line to the south side of the Kennedy
Lateral to facilitate business development south of this project.
A Good Place to Live
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
Phone (208) 888433 • FAX (208) 887813
Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211
COUNCIL MEMBERS
RONALD R.TOLSMA
MAX YERRINGTON
ROBERT D. CORRIE
WALT W. MORROW
WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP
Planner 8 Zoning Administrator
JIM JOHNSON
Chairman -Planning 8 Zoning
The Meridian School District is attempting to secure a site
adjacent to Meridian Greens Subdivision for an elementary school to
serve Elk Run No. 1 and other subdivisions south of I-84.
Annexation approval of Elk Run Subdivision No. 2 should include a
development agreement which stipulates that an adequate school site
be acquired by the school district in Section 19 before final plat
approval of Elk Run Subdivision No. 2 is granted by the City.
C~Oo p~`(
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
DEVELOPMENT GROUP
ANNERATION AND ZONING
A PORTION OF THE N.E. 1/4 OF
SECTION 24, T.3 N., R.1 W., B.M.
ELR RUN SUBDIVISION NO. 2
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The above entitled annexation and zoning application having
come on for consideration on January 11, 1994, at the hour of 7:30
o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho
Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the Council having heard and taken
oral and written testimony and the Applicants appearing through
their engineer, Gary Lee, and having duly considered the matter,
the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That notice of public hearing on the annexation and zoning
was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said
public hearing scheduled for January 11, 1994, the first
publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing;
that the matter was duly considered at the January 11, 1994,
hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express
comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were
made available to newspaper, radio and television stations;
2. That the property included in the application for
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 1
~~ i r
annexation and zoning is described in the application, and by this
reference is incorporated herein; that the property is
approximately 16.28 acres in size.
3. That the property is presently zoned by the county as R-T
(Rural Transition); that the Applicant requests that the majority
of the property be zoned R-4 with a small portion, .70 of an acre
zoned R-8, which portion is adjacent to that portion of Elk Run
Subdivision No. 1 which is zoned R-8 and stated that the use
proposed would be for proper residential as dictated by the
respective zone.
4. The general area surrounding the property is used
agriculturally and residentially; that the property to the north is
used residentially; that there is R-4 residential property to the
east across the Meridian/Kung Highway; the property to the south is
agricultural.
5. That the property is adjacent and abutting to the present
City limits.
6. The Applicant is the owner of record of the property and
has requested this annexation and zoning and the application is not
at the request of the City of Meridian.
7. That the property included in the annexation and zoning
application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian.
8. That the parcel of ground requested to be annexed is
presently included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area
(U.S.P.A.) as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the
Meridian Comprehensive Plan; that the property is included within
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 2
• •
the area designated in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as a Single
Family Residential area
9. There were no property owners, or anyone else, appearing
at the hearing to object to the application.
10. That the Applicants representative indicated that the
intended development of the property is for single family
dwellings; in the subdivision application it is represented that
the lots zoned R-4 would have a minimum of 8,000 square feet per
lot and that the lots zoned R-8 would have a minimum square footage
of 6,500 square feet; and that the value range would be between
$85,000.00 and $125,000.00.
11. The Applicant's representative stated at the hearing that
there would be 42 single family dwellings, a 2.6 density per acre.
1370 square feet to 2,200 square feet in each dwelling, a common
space of for landscape buffer, that lots would be landscaped and
fenced, that the developer agrees with the comments of the City
Engineer but desired clarification on one regarding the water line
near Highway 69; that there would be no school site within the
subdivision but that they had no disagreement with the letter from
the Meridian School District, that in the area zoned R-4 there
would be 80 feet of frontage and 1,400 square feet in the
dwellings; that the tiling of the Kennedy. required as a condition
under Elk Run No. 1, would be completed as part of Elk Run No. 2.
12. That in the Rural Area section of the Comprehensive Plan,
Land Use, Rural Areas, Section 6.3, it does state that land in
agricultural activity should so remain in agricultural activity
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 3
• •
until urban services can be provided.
13. That Meridian has, and is, experiencing a population
increase; that there are pressures on land previously used for
agricultural uses to be developed into residential subdivision
lots.
14. That the property can be physically serviced with City
water and sewer.
15. Meridian Police Department, Meridian Fire Department,
Meridian City Engineer, Meridian School District, Ada County
Highway District, Ada Street Name Committee, the Central District
Health Department, Nampa Meridian Irrigation District, and the
Meridian Planning Director submitted comments and such are
incorporated herein as if set forth in full.
16. That the R-4, Residential District is described in the
Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408 8. 3 as follows:
(R-4) LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT: The purpose of
the (R-4) District is to permit the establishment of low
density single-family dwellings, and to delineate those
areas where predominantly residential development has, or
is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan
or the City, and to protect the integrity of residential
areas by prohibiting the intrusion of incompatible non-
residential uses. The (R-4) District allows for a
maximum of four ( 4 ) dwellings units per acre and requires
connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of
the City of Meridian.";
that the R-4 zoning district requires a minimum of 1,400 square
feet to be included in houses in that zone; that the R-8,
Residential District is described in the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408
B. 4 as follows:
"(R-8) Medium Density Residential District: The purpose of
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 4
• •
the (R-8) Districts is to permit the establishment of single
and two (2) family dwellings at a density not exceeding eight
(8) dwelling units per acre. This district delineates those
areas where such development has or is likely to occur in
accord with the Comprehensive Plan of the City and is also
designed to permit the conversion of large homes into two (2)
family dwellings in well-established neighborhoods of
comparable land use. Connection to the Municipal Water and
Sewer systems of the City of Meridian is required."
17. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use,
Residential Policies, 2.1U states as follows:
"Support a variety of residential categories (urban, rural,
single-family, multi-family, townhouses, apartments,
condominiums, etc. ) for the purpose of providing the City with
a range of affordable housing opportunities."
18. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use,
Rural Areas, 6.3 c., it states as follows:
"Within the Urban Service Planning Area development may occur
in densities as low as 3 dwellings per acre if physical
connection is made to existing City of Meridian water and
sewer service and the property is platted and subdivided .
.'
19. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use,
Rural Areas, 6.4, it states as follows:
"Residential development is allowed in the rural area provided
that said development does not exceed the Rural Residential
Agricultural density, unless it is inside the Urban Service
Planning Area and City sewer and water is provided, then Low,
Medium and High density residential may be considered. All
residential development must also comply with the other
appropriate sections of this plan."
20. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Housing,
Housing Policies, at page 66, it states as follows:
"1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide
diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile
homes, multi-family, townhouses, apartments, condominiums."
"1.3 An open housing market for all persons, regardless of
race, sex, age, religion or ethnic background."
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 5
• •
"1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close
to employment and shopping centers should be encouraged."
21. That there is a population influx into the City of
Meridian at the present time which has been going on for some time
and is likely to continue; that the land is relatively close to
Meridian and economic conditions are making it difficult to
continue farming in the area.
22. That the City Engineer has previously submitted comment
in different applications that a determination of ground water
level and subsurface soil conditions should be made; that such a
comment is equally applicable to this Application.
23. That the Planning Director, Wayne Forrey, commented that
the R-4 request complied with the Comprehensive Plan, that the
developer should extend the Meridian Road sewer trunk line to the
south side of the Kennedy lateral to facilitate business
development south of this project; the director also stated that
the Meridian School District was attempting to secure an elementary
school site next to Meridian Greens Subdivision to serve Elk Run
and other subdivisions in the area and that development of this
subdivision should include a development agreement which stipulates
that an adequate school site has been acquired by the School
District before final plat approval of Elk Run No. 2.; that the
City received a copy of a letter mailed to The Development Company
which stated that this development is adjacent to the Kuna/Meridian
Road and is too small for a school and the District is not
interested in locating a school in this subdivision.
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 6
•
•
That in prior requests for annexation and zoning the Director
has commented that annexation could be conditioned on a development
agreement including an impact fee to help acquire a future school
or park sites to serve the area and that annexations should be
subject to impact fees for park, police, and fire services as
determined by the city and designated in an approved development
agreement.
24. The Meridian School District submitted comment and such
is incorporated herein as if set forth in full; its comment was
that there is no excess capacity in the schools of the District and
that residents of the new subdivision could not be assured of
attending the neighborhood schools; the School District asked for
support for a development fee or a transfer fee to help offset the
costs of building additional schools.
25. That in 1992 the Idaho State Legislature passed
amendments to the Local Planning Act, which in 67-6513 Idaho Code,
relating to subdivision ordinances, states as follows:
"Each such ordinance may provide for mitigation of the effects
of subdivision development on the ability of political
subdivisions of the state, including school districts, to
deliver services without compromising quality of service
delivery to current residents or imposing. substantial
additional costs upon current residents to accommodate the
subdivision.";
that the City of Meridian is concerned with the increase in
population that is occurring and with its impact on the City being
able to provide fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer,
parks and recreation services to its current residents and to those
moving into the City; the City is also concerned that the increase
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 7
• •
in population is burdening the schools of the Meridian School
District which provide school service to current and future
residents of the City; that the City knows that the increase in
population does not sufficiently increase the tax base to offset
the cost of providing fire, police, emergency health care, water,
sewer, parks and recreation services; and the City knows that the
increase in population does not provide sufficient tax base to
provide for school services to current and future students.
26. That pursuant to the instruction, guidance, and direction
of the Idaho State Legislature, the City may impose either a
development fee or a transfer fee on residential property, which if
possible would be retroactive and apply to all residential lots in
the City, because of the imperilment to the health, welfare, and
safety of the citizens of the City of Meridian.
27. That Section 11-9-605 C states as follows:
"Right-of-way for pedestrian walkways in the middle of long
blocks may be required where necessary to obtain convenient
pedestrian circulation to schools,. parks or shopping areas;
the pedestrian easement shall be at least ten feet (10')
wide."
28. That Section 11-9-605 G 1. states as follows:
"Planting strips shall be required to be placed next to
incompatible features such as highways, railroads, commercial
or industrial uses to screen the view from residential
properties. Such screening shall be a minimum of twenty feet
(20') wide, and shall not be a part of the normal street right
of way or utility easement."
29. That Section 11-9-605 H 2. states as follows:
"Existing natural features which add value to residential
development and enhance the attractiveness of the community
(such as trees, watercourses, historic spots and similar
irreplaceable amenities) shall be preserved in the design of
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - $
• •
the subdivision;"
30. That Section 11-9-605 K states as follows:
"The extent and location of lands designed for linear open
space corridors should be determined by natural features and,
to lesser extent, by man-made features such as utility
easements, transportation rights of way or water rights of
way. Landscaping, screening or lineal open space corridors
may be required for the protection of residential properties
from adjacent arterial streets, waterways, railroad rights of
way or other features. As improved areas (landscaped), semi-
improved areas (a landscaped pathway only), or unimproved
areas (left in a natural state), linear open space corridors
serve:
1. To preserve openness;
2. To interconnect park and open space systems within
rights of way for trails, walkways, bicycle ways;
3. To play a major role in c onserving area scenic and
natural value, especially waterways, drainages and
natural habitat;
4. To buffer more intensive adjacent urban land uses;
5. To enhance local identification within the area due
to the internal linkages; and
6. To link residential neighborhoods, park areas and
recreation facilities."
31. That Section 11-9-605 L states as follows:
Bicycle and pedestrian pathways shall be encouraged within new
developments as part of the public right of way or as separate
easements so that an alternate transportation system (which is
distinct and separate from the automobile) can be provided
throughout the City Urban Service Planning Area. The
Commission and Council shall consider the Bicycle-Pedestrian
Design Manual for Ada County (as prepared by Ada County
Highway District) when reviewing bicycle and pedestrian
pathway provisions within developments.
32. That the Applicant submitted an application for
preliminary plat along with the application for annexation and
zoning which application included a preliminary plat.
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW page - 9
• •
33. That proper notice was given as required by law and all
procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission were given and
followed.
CONCLUSIONS
1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local
Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have
been met; including the mailing of notice to owners of property
within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's
property.
2. That the City of Meridian has authority to annex land
pursuant to 50-222, Idaho Code, and Section 11-2-417 of the Revised
and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that exercise of
the City's annexation authority is a Legislative function.
3. That the Planning and Zoning Commission has judged this
annexation and zoning use application under Idaho Code, Section 50-
222, Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Meridian City
Ordinances, Meridian Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the record
submitted to it and things of which it can take judicial notice.
4. That all notice and hearing requirements set forth in
Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, and the Ordinances of the City of
Meridian have been complied with.
5. That the Commission may take judicial notice of
government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions
existing within the City and State.
6. That the land within the proposed annexation is
contiguous to the present City limits of the City of Meridian, and
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 10
•
the annexation would not be a shoestring annexation.
7. That the annexation application has been initiated by the
Applicant, owners of the property, and is not upon the initiation
of the City of Meridian.
8. That since the annexation and zoning of land is a
legislative function, the City has authority to place conditions
upon the annexation of land.
9. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply
with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular
Section 11-9-616, which pertains to development time schedules and
requirements, and Section 11-9-605 M., which pertains to the tiling
of ditches and waterways.
10. That this Application has been submitted prior to the
adoption of the proposed amendment to the Meridian Comprehensive
Plan; that as a condition of annexation the Applicant must agree
that the Meridian Comprehensive Plan shall apply to the land and
any development.
11. That the Applicant's property is in compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan, and therefore the annexation and zoning
Application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
12. That the requirements of the Meridian City Engineer,
including those he specifically stated in his comments and those
stated herein in these Findings and Conclusions, and of the Ada
County Highway District, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District,
Meridian Fire Department, and the comments of the Meridian Planning
Director, except for any requirement that a school site must be
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 11
• •
located in the Applicant's proposed subdivision, shall be met and
addressed in a development Agreement.
13. That all ditches, canals, and waterways shall be tiled as
a condition of annexation and if not so tiled the property shall be
subject to de-annexation.
14. That the Applicant will be required to connect to
Meridian water and sewer and resolve how the water and sewer mains
will serve the land; that the development of the property shall be
subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development
Ordinance; that, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall
be require#d to enter into a development agreement as authorized by
11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall
address the inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of
11-9-605 C, G 1, H 2, K, L and the comments of the Planning
Director, Wayne Forrey, except as noted herein regarding the
placement of a school within the proposed subdivision; that the
development agreement shall, as a condition of annexation, require
that the Applicant, or if required, any assigns, heirs, executors
or personal representatives, pay, when required, any impact,
development, or transfer fee, adopted by the City; that there shall
be no annexation until the requirements of this paragraph are met
or, if necessary, the property shall be subject to de-annexation
• and loss of City services, if the requirements of this paragraph
are not met.
15. That the house size requirements for the R-4 and R-8
districts must be met and those representations of Applicants
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 12
•
representative made at the public hearing, which are recited in
Paragraph 10 of the Findings of Fact and houses must be constructed
at a value ~e#~s~e~n $85, 000.00 - , , as represented in
the application for .subdivision approval.
16. That proper and adequate access to the property is
available and will have to be maintained.
17. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind
the applicant and its assigns.
18. With compliance of the conditions contained herein, the
annexation and zoning of R-4 and R-8 Residential would be in the
best interest of the City of Meridian.
19. That if these conditions of approval are .-aeb met the
f2O'~
property shall be subject to de-annexation.
APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and
approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONER HEPPER
COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE
COMMISSIONER SHEARER
COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI
CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER)
VOTED_~%r `~~--
VOTED ~ v
VOTE D-~
VOTED ~ ~'
VOTED
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 13
• •
DECISION AND RECOMMENDATION
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends
to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the
annexation and zoning as stated above for the property described in
the application with the conditions set forth in these Findings of
Fact and Conclusions of Law and that the Applicant be specifically
required to the all ditches, canals and waterways, meet all of the
Ordinances of the City of Meridian, specifically including the
development time requirements, and enter into the required
development agreement, and that if the conditions are not met that
the property be de-annexed.
MOTION:
APPROVED: ~(
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
DISAPPROVED:
Page - 14
OFFICIALS
WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk
JANICE GASS, Treasurer
BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt.
WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR.. Attorney
JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt.
KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief
BILL GORDON, Police Chief
GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer
• HUB OF TREASURE VALLE~
A Good Place to Live COUNCILMEN
CITY OF MERIDIAN RROBERTGI S ERA
MAX YERRINGTON
33 EAST IDAHO ROBERT D. CORRIE
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 chairman zoning a Planni
Phone (208) 888-4433 JIM JOHNSON
FAX (208) 887-4813 Centennial Coordinator
PATSY FEDRIZZI
GRANT P. KINGSFORD
Mayor
TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your coin ents and recommendations will be
considered by the Meridian ~~ .
may we have your answer by ~ 'S / 9' 9 Y
TRANSMITTAL DATF_ : ~ 2 ~ 2 ~ ~ 3 "HE>~RING
~PX~
RE®UEST~
DATE ~" ~~ ~9u
~~~
~,~ ~ ~, z
ON OF PROPERTY
LOCATI
-~-~
Q ~,t~b
~~
OR PROJECT ~ ~ e~~'`
~' `1'l.c~ '~. ~
~
JIM JOHNSON P/Z MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND fINAI PLATS)
JIM SHEARER, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DLSTRICT
CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION
TIM HEPPER, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
GRANT KINGSfORD, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR..:OISTRICT
RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION`DISTRICT
BOB CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER C0 (PRELIM ANO FINAL PLATS)
BOB GIESLER, C/C U:S. WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
MAX YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. CITY FILES / ~ ` / % '~
BUILDING INSPECTOR OTHER (9
FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS ,
POLICE DEPARTMENT
~ L~~r
~ a~
~ ~
CITY ATTORNEY _
`~'`
-
GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER ~~`~" ~ ~ `ems" s
WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER
i ~1
e-
~ ~~ ~~
• ~ SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS
Bob L. Haley
~pR ExCE~` n ~f DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT
p ~Zn daE~~II~~~ DanMabe,Finance&Administration
2 DIRECTORS
- ~ DEC 1 0 1~~3 Sheryl Belknap, Elementary
rt Jim Carberry, Secondary
- ~:.y~~~~~~~ ~~~ Christine Donnell, Personnel
~ C~T~C ~~ ` Doug Rutan, Special Services
JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2
911MERIDIANSTREET • MERIDIAN,IDAH083642 PHONE(208)888-6701
December 6, 1993
City of Meridian
33 East Idaho
Meridian, Idaho 83642
RE: Elk Run Subdivision No. 2
Dear Councilmen:
I have reviewed the application for Elk Run Subdivision No. 2.
This planned development will accelerate the need for Joint
School District No. 2 to construct additional classrooms and/or
to adjust school attendance boundaries. Meridian Schools do not
have excess capacity. Nearly every school in the district is
beyond capacity.
The Meridian School District supports economic growth for Idaho
and specifically the district's area, but such growth produces a
need for additional school construction. We ask your support for
a development fee statute on new home construction or a real
estate transfer fee to help offset the costs of building
additional school facilities. If this support is lacking then we
ask that additional residential development be denied.
Residents of the new subdivision cannot be assured of attending
the neighborhood school as it may be necessary to bus students to
available classrooms across the district.
We ask that you assure the developer will provide walkways, bike
paths and safe pedestrian access.
Sincerely,
b ~~.
Deputy Superintendent
DM:gr
Ia N
y
iU M Lr N r . n~ .
:'r Z m
r N +: ~. ~
_ C, f' .1• `t
Ca ~ '•
]I. N irf f1. Ca •r'^ T S fA
~~ Y
~
r to N ~'O is n ~ r r T w. A•
.; ^I .y J- f, ~' V, f/1
~
~ ? .
. t
~
r r
• _
~
Y
r ^
al ~ S r M ~ r C. f"
x _
r F Y :
1;;• m r
C =
_
1
y.
d
~`4 C, Q. Y. r . in
fn
~
~ Y!
~•
Y it a
I j r n•
r
a I.
` ~ w I
l"'a y
nr
~ Cn r
J
! f ..
1r
O_ M
i' «
~
~ m Y'
:I Y r
1f1
N f~ I
« `.. y f ~• !• •
T !w
Nf T N .
r C ~ -.
_
~ p• v i.r S
~ 3 y
S ~ it' 'r r Ial 'A a T
R
m {
M a 1 Iar =. ~ Y ~ Z
•-• W o
~'
« t•
W YYY W W fr M p a r na
4 tq
C'
~ N m ~ ~ f! N
r « N
N ~ r ~ 4a
N C• W r 4.
n,
1 •
C Va 4, . « VI rrl ^.
al A ~• i p-
W t W V 4~ J . r ~ ~r ~ a' IV •i• Ifi
.: +C
'i
~~ 1
i
~ « a•, x _ ~!._ t m
~~a M W yl ~ Af
C i y ' t.
4Va1 p it1 ~ C. • . ~
Y y : . as a .u
u a
r
" n
N N O O _i
~ ••t C « iF
~ ~ `I'
..y t Y ~ `
6. m n, ~. ~.. V IC~a P ~ W .a A ~l ! a t/1 ~ t/a
W . V VI i I
al a!
W •
p q
~ «
' i Y
nr r y
+
ua o v Y 'V
r
m ~ w c
~ : .
fY V '~ O ..1 v
i
=
:~~
w an wt ~ -
G
« ~ f
t O « •'' C. L
~ ~ C « ~ G U
ch J : ~ ~ ^I ! m ... ` `J rJ, P a i s ~rl t a•
s ~
1 •
b Y
h ro « 1 ~ 1 O
M
W
~~ a « pa ~
~ O 1
I V1
al~PNi~tO•atapptyWaW Io V$ ~~:• ~
~ I
M i
N
.D
. 4 T A N
tL . 'A
•rf
MMM111 •O Yf •
• 1 1
y f r~
p
t
M G :
~ .. 1
yl V W W ft:
r tr pr
w
tp ~ i
yi:
~` T
~ ?I
e ~ .
to
Y.
~ t9 i
~ ~
777 [Y O « ~ y r. «
~
10 ~
to [/I « IY _ry !~ W
p
~
• I m ~ W ~ to Y
~
ry •' « rr
'I
n ~
~ tO N IT '
y
Q
N O~
~~ • C
~, «,.
O
I ~ aA N « 1
. • I I
i
1 I.N r. m w r \ N u - i a' V ~ : a./f ~ y
O m V i' . C nr y. ., p W ¢
P ~ ? N i'
.O
~
•
p' ` « I Y . ep « ~ N
N>
. a.. . Ip V O V m
q
«
• « i «
o « = '`
~ 4 ! to « 'taw i
; • _^- - , ~ C ~ rNia «
~ « ' v rtii m ii .'.'. en • .p ly r lia w
j 6r pr S• -0 Iii V ar W r
=
W«
i.n N =
U M R• lra r
~1
i
w x
: O• •P 0 6 '.R. r i
•p • .Op•~r-fr
• w ~
•
~ g « ~ r ~ 4
'~~~
~ ee.pmm.e rn.n• ~rs
p
~ y
~ art '• _
to x ~
'
f
ry N ' i•r ^^ ~ ~ '~
t'it , v
t - N •/1 .~L W ti y
r ~ « I V
.
m
b : VI W Vl ~t, m V
Ita J V cw T V Iv f"t
11{{aa
I
I
Y
•
1
r p I
W Y ~
Y1Y iN
~ • Qa
^
>s x t
1 -
N m a' O VI ~1 nl i• ~L O N
I r
S
~ ra tp •f1 •p V V -0 i• W m VI V
Ire
Y
v II P ~~ f
~ Q«~ ~~
R
ti« W W 41 Y
~
nR j M 7r K are K+ M M YN art K K afr ~ m
R
r
Y
7 . •
~
~~~
~ G t «
1
! ~
r . ~ ~ t/~ Q1 m tV
W O -0 ry to .-0O Qi ~ Y W O P ~ P •i }! M =
y
r ~ y
=
ttl Yr G ~
r •~ M ± .
~ tB : iw 6Gi i V ~ ~ N • r
~
~~ ~
•
~
••^ ~ r I
N t
to
A.
I M W «• a• ~ I
I
P
W•~
~~ ~
N^ ~
~ O t1D
= GN ~ m .p-
.o V •p 6 0 PP
_ V -0-0 W N N O® N W m r r~
~ ~ I .~.1
A
s
I P
0
~
«
a• 1 «
~
~
V
m
I !
y
~
~
~
Y
P «
~ O.Op w ~ V.Vp ~.. P d.Imit Pag~ti .~~
/1
ro
0
I •
N
M m
ry ti ~ /-
W m
i
ra 6ry11
~ V «
°' a~
~ O V~ P a i 1
°
^
i « rn
~ i «,'. I « P-a W..vPa
a'
w~uuo~
O
~
`
o
J• U
-
-
mtti
~
I ~ a M
« ~ « ~
«
~ p«
av « i 1 1
m
~ fpia . i N m •m0 •Vp
-0i V P
i O a
p
•
« N r a~
~ •
~ ti
. I i i M a•
~
« ~ «
a !
1 Y
« «
O ~ 1 ~ r I
I ~mPta~~~~ Irv+~i~mrt,a'
« I
(
ice: i
ff
I
~ ~
•
O«
• ~ Can
• S tV.l i
I N Y ~ j eq
I-
j m ~ 1'V N a• O.~ p~ O-0 S r '
'
I K e • Q ~
« N«~ ~S
i O=~~®_
as ~
« 00 OO@00
000000V ~;
«
na
y
s « K~a
~ .n « O
Yenw•ee a
Oe
er
`e'•e'a
'
O
e
w
@
e
s
• w W
t
:$ I
t.
• n ~ r?e w•S 1 a
M OOT ~ 1
« i
.
a
e,
~
a
e e
n •
i
ar
e •
ss
~
1 q Aa
011f roroay N~ Nlvq Na
t
~~
A
• 4f « NI b a
t
'
~
v « ~~ ~ • lre •t = I
to ^ a•to
~
~ • p
o
O ro
M H •• aK k ~ arOe nON K •Ora • O ® O O nt CC
~
•e•aw are arYw ~
-1 •
! .
i
•-0~
-1 . N
~ ~
-
P
~ ~$ •
P • I
p,
V
«
~°
®~
V
~
o •
1 ~
17r N
~
aa^ T M IWi, ~ m C ~
r
of r
a• I
'
~
p
T ~
«
m
~ I
ym±. ~~
a~ts
t
.t
.
i
~
1
IV P ~ V tV ~
.3~~
I
~
•
~
^ I
1
~
Y IV M
i O «
a ~. V
Y
r ` M r
• ~l •
y
i/1 •
f
• -0 y
eta _
'p
I IOit ~ ? Ra O f.~ i J
.
tV
~ S V i i
:
~
• Va
i ~
V1 M W W! V= 1 I
-0 tJ1
• i• Y~ O .Wp _
• !
.
.
41 r ~
I
~
~
« I N« W P m 1 ~a
I m« O~ ~ N R= t0 V ~
~ y
~~ •p V q
ry O
N
W
V
L
m
r. «
' ~ « P m•~ w r ~ '
tw R A i ry _W ~ 1~
teyy
~ «;
>t 1
1
V~ t~ O
G
r1 O W ry P
O
ti
~•~~
•
tft
N 1 P
~ F O• 611
r
^ ~
~ I
•
- Y f
' -0 r0 fit tY a• r m .p'
•p tP tY1 m a
IV ~ .O p. N .O r r m r W .! ~ •p tetf i'it
{a p
+ _
P
m
«
«
1.1 I
« J I1 ..pp o y
~
N ~ i I
ia i O ~
0 tPia J Rl t . i • si
11
^ « + ~J : 1 ~ "+~
~
«
~
Y
a tp
N i-0it fNJI W t W~ ~`:i P~ m nVa11 V N
«
•
^
•
~ e0 Irll
~~~ ~
M
' ~
«
t- M a
ay
« VI V ~
M
•
« ~ . .
m«
• i
~ ~ « tea
e m O~ ry 6N • O~ O t1• O O O O O~~
1
I •
I
• -0 « V ~r P
~
° `
tD : ~ f~fa m 1
~
6Wx : _
~ p. ~ iJl fNV N InaV m+~ n ~
+
O m
«
« or~a
s
4
« oe
~' ~
I •
O
IV IV ~
+ (
"N ~~`o"awl
I y
«o~ ~'
K ! « ' eostao•TOO 000eo9~@.4~
o I
•n+Oia «
V
N fv r f
N N
! N LI ~ + r ~ ~ i, « _
~ ~
W N + ~ r r ~ ~ ~ ~
1 Q « I ? art art K K a
e eQe w are' to r ne are afe r. ars
tq
r 1 I
I
I
•
~ Y .
N J •p
1 « i.
``•^1 ~
ry
W
T
~ _
• ~ m N 1
tD 4 ry m -0
• i' ~ W •
n11 • !
I
~ ~
N YII /p ry ti/ ? i.11 Rat _ i.•1 a• Vf p a• a• O r
V O 611 .b e11 m N V -0 .~ a• /V m
• IT ~ I.Y ry IV N m,;'~ p ^, .O O m m ti .ap
!
.
r
~ ~ u +
M
~
•
t
~ m«~ N W~
'
Y • w ~ I
i
N a 1 1 1 1= I
P Aa ro N t- tit to .
0 iA i11 O n, 4a ~l t~ ~ v W V J m
^
i
ry N
m «
rN ~ M ~
^ "•
~ N m V •
« : S
Yy~r _ !
{tpa ^^^M
^ •, N A ~ ~
~' ~ Mt O Y. i
«
y~i Y 1
O M I Jr •
t
j
CN ! tp W a V V1 P f i• V ~ ~ yl '~
O iC V ! ~
y
~
~ •
~ '~
t
a9
a• M ~a ~ r1
t~
+ T
1 M i a ~
N ~
v W ~
« I
• ~
~ na O' Rr m
~ p
P L O VI i• fr11 -0 m~ W W ry V O V w'
a!
• m
..
N tJl
~
« _ 1 1
p' v f0 VI P tr, W ,
m N t/l .> n, W V O~ V fat ~ V m V
~~
'~ fp Z
It1 ~ N i T I
I
.
~ fIf 2 to ti N 3 'IY1
'
~ . O ~ to S In
e't r a ! •
a..oN
aI~ rT~1
I/V
a
t
a~ ~
m
M .a'p .ni ii
n rte,
'p r• .'r. o~~rav
.~
VIN fJ V t. !~ISimo~~-•Nwa~'.a ~i mm..°. a :a' e
til VI LN
O
r
rr l.
~ R Q: t R ua •4
? O O ~ .
•
G; t .O .t. Cn W S W ry I
• /
_
t tJa <
= -0 -0
t t>• O fV ~ = rJa w
V ~'-
I
~ ~ ~ -a: ci+ fp C
.
.
v.= .o~m=r= a
r _ d - a rT,
e t
ao~`_a `
~
.~'. `f`j"r".w ~ 3vi
-~ o ~ .
.
mv~;i
r
W
~
~y~~{~~r ,y
~_; ~~ P^
~S
"
r ` f'J r r ~
VI ~ .J ~
f1 fV O fJl
~ C
O~ :w ~ ~ V j~
~ Q 1
fJ ! D W
<N W ya J T ~ tN
® ~ ~ .' + in N f ~ • cr .l, = j A~ O I
~
rr
,
r
~
i
~
a
_`e_ .
. .
.
.O fJl V of t
N N
~~twr'I (.~
f ~
a M? 'p f+^r -0 w • N V ^
.• tnt~• • ~ fp ~N Ua <u .P •
? ./a to rr ~ fr ~ T 1
O
s
a/
Iwsau W Yt•N r. V1 IN ~ .~ ~ O
{
~
~ V. ~ G ~ ,~ j ~
,r
JW
`
O n
N • t/1
•' W•? P
ti f Ap A ~t`ea 4i ~`1 `n tr • T
N .t
~
4
D
w O ai. ap
: ~
f N
fy !(' i T
~ O C•
' n :V iu O ^~ ~a
i
,Q ~! •
c~rc
JAMES E. BRUCE, President
GLENN J. RHODES, Vice President
SHERRY R. HUBER, Secretary
RECEI~IED
D ~ ~ 3 0 1y9~
CITY OF MERIDIAN
December 27, 1993
T0:
The Development Group
1895 S. Meridian Road
Meridian ID 83642
FROM: Larry Sale, ~'e
Developmen
SUBJECT: ELK RUN SUBDIVISION #2 - PRELIMINARY PLAT
On December 22, 1993, the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway
District (hereafter called "District") approved the Preliminary
Plat as stated on the attached staff report.
In order that the Final Plat may be considered by the District for
acceptance, the Developer shall cause the following applicable
standard conditions to be satisfied prior to District certification
and endorsement:
1. Drainage plans shall be submitted and subject to review and
approval by the District.
2. If bublic street improvements are required: Prior to any
construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-
way, the following shall be submitted and subject to review
and approval by the District:
a. Three complete sets of detailed street construction
drawings prepared by an Idaho Registered Professional
Engineer, together with payment of plan review fee.
b. Execute an Inspection Agreement between the Developer and
the District together with initial payment deposit for
inspection and/or testing services.
c. Complete all street improvements to the satisfaction of
the District, or execute Surety Agreement between the
Developer and the District to guarantee the completion of
construction of all street improvements.
ada county highway district
318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680
•
December 27, 1993
Page 2
•
3. Furnish copy of Final Plat showing street names as approved by
the Local Government Agency having such authority together
with payment of fee charged for the manufacturing and
installation of all street signs, as required.
4. If Public Rights-of-Way Trust Fund deposit is required, make
deposit to the District in the form of cash or cashier's check
for the amount specified by the District.
5. Furnish easements, agreements, and all other datum or
documents as required by the District.
6. Furnish Final Plat drawings for District acceptance,
certifications, and endorsement. The final plat must contain
the signed endorsement of the Owner's and Land Surveyor's
certification.
7. Approval of the plat is valid for one year. An extension of
one year will be considered by the Commission if requested
within 15-days prior to the expiration date.
Please contact me at 345-7680, should you have any questions.
LS
cc: Development Services
Chron
JUB Engineers, Inc.
Meridian City Hall
•
c~;r~c
JAMES E. BRUCE, President
GLENN J. RHODES, Vice President
SHERRY R. HUBER, Secretary
TO:
ACI3D Commission
"t LATER-DEPARTMENT
CORRESPONDENCE
ELKRUN2/DSTECH
12-22-93
DATE: December 17, 1993
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Development Services
PRELIMINARY PLAT - ELK RUN SUBDIVISION #2
(Developer - The Development Group, 1895 S. Peridian Rd.,
Meridian, ID 83642)
(Engineer/Surveyor - JUB Engineers, Inc., 250 S. Beechwood
Ave., Boise, ID 83709)
FACTS & FINDINGS:
1. Elk Run #2 is a 42-Iot single family residential subdivision
on 16.3 acres of property located at the southwest corner of
State Highway 69 (Kona-Meridian Road) and Calderwood Street.
There will. be 2,940-feet of new public streets added to the
system. This project is expected to generate 420 vehicle
trips per day.
2. State. Highway 69 (Kona-Meridian Road.) is under the. jurisdic-
Lion of Idaho Transportation Department (ITD). The developer
is required to submit application materials to ITD for review
and. requirements of that Department. The Ada COunty Ridge-Ta-
Rivers Pathway Plan indicates a future bicycle route along
this .roadway.
3. Calderwood Street. currently has 30-.feet of right-of-way north
of part of the frontage as shown on the preliminary plat. The
street has not been constructed yet. The District has road
trust monies far future 5-foot sidewalk in said existing
right-of-way that was platted as a part of Elk Run Subdivision.
The ?_000 Urban Functional Street Classification Map does not
show Calderwood Street as a collector roadway although the
District is recommending that the-map be amended. to show this
street as a collector. The District requires a minimum of
60-feet of right-of-way on collectors, width sufficient for 3
traffic. lanes, and 5-foot sidewalks. The ultimate right-of-
way will be acquired now as development is occuring.
ado county highway district
318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680
PRELIMINARY PLAT - ~ RUN STJBDIVISION #2 •
December 17, 1993
Page 2
The developer will be required to construct a ~1-faot street
section with 5-foot sidewalks.
4. Lot 27 of Block 4 is proposed. to Yiave direct access to
Calderwood Street. Staff recommends. that the lot layout. be
rearranged so that Lot 27 may take access to a local street
and not the collector.
5. The proposal shawl 'thr.ee culdesac streets without extensi.an to
any project boundary. The Kennedy Lateral forms. the entire
western. boundary of the project and crossing the. lateral will.
require. a crossing of this. lateral. Staff recommends that one.
of the. culdesacs be extended to the property boundary for
future neighborhood inter connections.
6. This application is scheduled. for public hearing by the Meridi-
an Planning & Zoning Commission on January 11, 1993.
aITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS:
:l.. Comply with requirements of ITD for State Highway 69 front-
age. Submit to the District a letter from ITD regarding said
requirements.
2. Dedicate 30-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of
Calderwaod Street abutting parcel. The owner will be compen-
sated far this additional right-of-way from available impact.
fee revenues. in this benefit zone..
3. Construct Caldertuood Street as a fully improved 41-foot street
section with 5-foot sidewalks on both. sides. The owner will.
be compensated. far the curb and. the. difference in pavement.
width between a collector and a local. street (5-feet) from
available impact fee revenues. in this benefit. zone..
4. Direct lot or parcel access to Calderwood Street is prohihit-
ed, in compliance. with District policy. Lat access restric-
tions. shall be stated. on the final plat.
5. Extend one culdesac.to the western property boundary, gref:era-
bly S. Covey Ave..
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS__
i. Street and drainage improvements required in the public right-
of-way shall be designed. and constructed in conformance with
District standards. and. policies.
Y
PRFLIMI~V'ARY PLAT -~K RUN SU]3DIVISION #2 •
T~ecember 17, 1993
~~age 3
7.. Dedicated streets and drainage. systems shall be designed. and
constructed in conformance with. District standards and poli-
cies.
3. Specifications., land surveys, reports., plats, drawings, plans.,
design information and c~3lculati.ons presented. to ACRD shall. be
sealed, signed and dated. by a Registered. Professional. Engineer
or Professional Land. surveyor, in compliance, with Idaho Code,
section 54-12.15.
4. Provide written approval from the appropriate irriga-
Lion/drainage district authorizing storm runoff into their
system.
5. Locate obstructions (utility facilities, irrigatior. and drain-
age appurtenances, etc. outside of the. proposed street im-
provements. Authorization for relocations shall be obtained
from the appropriate entity.
6. continue existing irrigation. and. drainage systems across par-
cel.
7. Submit three sets of street construction plans. to the District
for review and appropriate action.
8. Submit site drainage plans.. and calculations. far review and.
appropriate action by ACRD. The praposed drainage system
shall conform to the requirements of the. Gity of Meridian and
shall retain all storm. water on-site.
Public street drainage facilities shall. be located in the
public right-of-way or in a drainage easement set aside. specif-
ically for that. use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes,
sheds, or other valuable amenities placed. in said easement.
Drainage easements and.the.ir use restrictions shall be noted
on the. plat.
9. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for
review and appropriate action by ACRD.
10. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum. of 5-feet from the side.
l.ot property lines when the driveways are not being shared.
with the adjacent property.
11. Developer shall provide. the Distxict with a copy of the record-
ed plat prior. to the installation. of street. name signs.
street signs will not be ordered. until all fees have been paid
and a copy of the recorded. plat has been provided to ACHD
staff. rI'he copy of the recorded plat. shall. show the recording
information as inscribed by the. Deputy County Recorder.
PRELIMINARY PLAT - ~ RUN SUBDIVISION #2 •
December 17, 1993
Page 4
12. Install a stop sign an every unsignalized approach of a
project street to an intersection involving a collector or
arterial as the cross-street. The stop sign shall be in-
stalled when the project street is first accessible. to the
motoring p~.,iblic .
13. A right-of-way permit must be obtained. from ACHD for all
street and utility construction within the public. right-of-
way. Contact Construction Services at 345-7667 (with zoning
f i ie number 1 for details .
14. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any require-
ment or policy autlined herein shall be made, in writing, to
the Manager of Engineering Services within 15 calendar days of
the original Commission action. The request shall. include. a
statement explaining why such a requirement would result in
substantial. hardship or inequity.
Should you have any questions. or comments., please contact. the
Development Services Division. at 345-7662.
STAFF SUBMLTTING• DATE OF COMMISSION APPROVAL:
Larry sale DEC 2 2 1993
r
I
~_ » s.g
•
4~
1 ~ _ ~ r~
1 ~ S
~~ _ '!o _I
,3-~~ ~'-C..
i
I
I
4
~3 .z ,~
1 ~ ~
_ _l _ _ ,y_, _
~~ ,.
W. CAVENP^F' DR t
X16
29
26~~ ~
tS
~2 2
a . gar OR
~
t7 uJ ~ 2S r' ~ 6 l
Q } i0 ji.
~ ~i -+ ~ ~~
W CJ 9
t
g ~
32 rJ
23 I
'8
H 9
a_ _~ ^ .._ ,., 2
~ 33 22 7
, , aDC1( 3
~~
,
~ O34
2i
2G ~
6 4
S
'`,
t
>~
~d 28 27 2A B t 2 ~
33 ,~
P
~ u
~ i
d 2S i 7 ~
.~ S 3
32
~
~ 1s ~ 9
~ 4
BLOp( J
23 ~ ~
3~ ~ UNAMm 57REF 7' ~ _
t8 17
~r 21 7
~o« .
19 76
e
e~oac
4 t s
20
t• 9
10
t3
/1
2^
~ =
~y0
~
~y
~
~ ~ p
VICM11
~ 1 ~I '~r , 2 ,
•
i
-w _'
i
RT
r nq I J
-.O~~~O~JUS
4G\ - ~ -
_ ___C~.L~T ~
4
~ i
~ ` K, ~ rya tv G o Y
~. ,~.. I G 2 '~ ~
W I
I
J3. \ cJ
P
~ ~~~~,r _~ ~ v g
0
~~ I
yj ~ i
• a
N ~ Y
o Z~~=~
}} V =
• ` ~
N N
~~~ b f i ~ ° _ ~ ~~ 1j ~~ exi ~ i e
., „E~3 d~3z~gg i€~~E i a .3~E ~?tl;~ ~o
a1 ~~~i~3~~E ,.:~ t ~ m ,
r I . I I . r: a~ I I r
I i ~S I~ i ~ ~ ~ I ~ i ~ (.
I ~ ~ ~ ~ I-
a . ~} ~ ~ o~
" .~ ~r . , slid ~ , . 1 ~, ~~ _ N~ •
i ~~ ~F ~'f ~i j~ Nis! ~j f!~ j ~ ~~ II ~ i~~ `~~ ~`
i~~ '{~ ~~~ 1 ~~ ! ~ ~ ~ ' ~i,i ~s
_ s ~
s
A
a s k a~
z ~~~l~~ ~g~~~~i
--~-~
3 •(M ~w-mil ivWL
II _,jtaa +~
1 ! ~
.,$ ~.
~~
91M~ O t!M
• ~\1\~~
~..
~~._ onto a 3_.r-_ - ~8 ' yG
,.~' .~ ~ j ~~'
;~ - ra _
I
I ~ ~-Ti~s~
' ++ - w
~ • ~ t
I ~
'i I
~. ~ ~ _ .
Y
~_ ~ a -
I~ I ~~~
~ a z a a
1 "
I
~ a '''~ °'A~~'
~ R ~ •I ~ t
I
1
~~! I w,l~ I t
..
..::~ ~ ~ .
~ 1~
~--.
f ~ L _ I.:::::::~ ,. ~~
X1.+,+1
=g~°~
a'~_~
i
s
I S~ •
- - ~. .:!
A -.
.. ~''y+`
.. -/ A'/~
CENTRAL ~ ~
•• DISTRICT
HEALTH ~~~~~~~ Retumto:
DEPARTMENT ^ BOISe
DEC 1 4 f9S3 ^ Eagle
REVIEW SHEET ^ G ro c~
Rezone #
~ CI~''y w ~~~~I~I<~1r~N a en ay
~/ eridian
]~'Kuna
Use #
final/Short Plat ~ L/~ ~QU~/ l/(j /I/iSro,J~~ •,~• ^ ACz
^ 1. We have no objections to this proposal.
^ 2. We recommend denial of this proposal.
^ 3. Spec'rfic knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can commern on this
proposal.
^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can commern.
^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewge disposal, we will require more data
concerning the depth of
^ high seasonal ground water
^ solid lava from original grade
^ 6. We^can approve this proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers:
2 feet
^ 4 feet
7. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for:
Central .sewage ^ Community sewage system ^ Community water well
Irnerim sewage ~ Cernral water
^ Individual sewage ^ Individual water
8. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of HeaRh
and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality:
Central sewage ^ Community sewage system^ Community water
^ Sewage dry lines ~- Central water
`~ 9. Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding probelm.
^ 10. This department wouki recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined
'rf other considerations indicate approval.
^ 11. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho
State Sewage Regulations.
^ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan reiew for any:
^ Food establishment ^ Swimming pools or spas
^ Beverage establishment ^ Grocery store
^ 13:
^ Child Care Cerner
DATE: ~~z,~~ ~'
l
Reviewed by;~ >>
CDHD 10-91 rcb
OFFICIALS
WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk
JANICE GASS, Treasurer
BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt.
WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR.. Attorney
JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt.
KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief
BILL GORDON. Police Chief
GARY SMITH, P.E.. City Engineer
• HUB OF TREASURE VALLE~
A Good Place to Live
~~~~~~~
COUNCILMEN
CITY OF MERIDIAN °~~' ~ 1993 RROBERTGIESLERA
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
Phone (208) 888-4433
FAX (208) 887-4813
GRANT P. KINGSFORD
Mayor
CIT'E' ~a'' 1t~1~~~@J~F~BERTD.ICORR E
Chairman Zoning 6 Plann~
~ JIM JOHNSON
~ Ifs
~/~ nn ,.~
l~U 9~/// Centennial Coordlnatoi
PATSYFEDRIZZI
®
~~~f~19
NgMpA & 93
~RRI MER
TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEV~~d~MA~ROJECTS
WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your com~jents and recommendations will be
considered by tl~e Me1-idian i'~ .
may we have your answer by ~ _ .5 / 9' 4 Y
TRANSMITTAL DATE : 12 ~ 2 ~ Ql 3 - HEraRING DATE : ~ " ~ ~ ' 9 ~
Q~~>~~
`ne. 2
REaUEST~
f //~~
B Y ~ ~ / lT A , ;~ ~ U~
LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: ~ ~ c~
C ~ Q~~,;,:r Sam; ` .ln ~" `71.~~ ..
JIM JOHNSON P/Z MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
JIM SHEARER, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION
TIM HEPPER, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR..OISTRICT
RONALD TOLSMA, C/C ScTTLFRS IaalraTlnN DISTRICT
BOB CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO~.-(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
BOB GIESLER, C/C US: WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
MAX YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. CITY FILES
BUILDING INSPECTOR OTHER:
G
FIRE DEPARTMENT YOU R CONCISE REMAR ~
POLICE DEPARTMENT
CITY ATTORNEY
GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER
WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER
. ~
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-888-6201
9 December 19 9 3 Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861
Boise 343-1884
SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission Boise 345-2431
33 East Idaho
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Re: Annexation and Zoning with Preliminary Plat
Elk Run Subdivision No. 2
Hearing Date: January 11, 1994
Commissioners:
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District's Kennedy Lateral courses
along the east boundary of this project. The right-of-way of the
Kennedy Lateral is 55 feet: 35 feet to the right and 20 feet to
the left of center facing downstream. See Idaho Code 42-1208--
RIGHTS-OF-WAY NOT SUBJECT TO ADVERSE POSSESSION. The developer
must contact John P. Anderson or Bill Henson at Nampa & Meridian
Irrigation District, 466-0663 or 345-2431, for approval before any
encroachment or change of right-of-way occurs.
Fencing has been installed where it restricts the District's
maintenance road on the Kennedy Lateral's right-of-way at Elk Run
Subdivision No. 1. This encroachment must be addressed, and this
fencing and any further encroachments must be under a License
Agreement. Contact Andy Harrington at 342-4591 for this agreement.
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. re:~~:ires that a La;,d Use
Change/Site development application be filed for review prior to
final platting. Contact Donna Moore at 343-1884 or 466-7891 for
further information.
All laterals and waste ways must be protected. Municipal surface
drainage must be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves
the site, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must_repi~w drainage
plans. The developer must comply with Idaho Code 313$0;5. It is
recommended that irrigation water be made avai3.eb~3~''r' to all
developments within Nampa & Meridian 3z'rg~~ion Di~tri~.y~`
.,
r_.
Bill Henson, Foreman
pc: District Water Supe~ilgte>rrflex~t
Andy Harrington APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
File - office and shop RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-888-6201
15 December 19 9 3 Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861
Gary A. Lee Boise 343-1884
J. U. B. Engineers, IriC. SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
250 South Beechwood Avenue Boise 345-2431
Boise, ID 83709
RE: Land Use Change Application for Elk Run Subdivision No. 2
Dear Mr. Lee:
Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to
file with the Irrigation District for its review on the above-
referenced development.
You were previously sent a complete packet of information
concerning Land Use Change, urban irrigation, and exclusion.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free
to call on Donna Moore at the District's office or John Anderson,
the District's Water Superintendent at the District's shop.
Sincerely,
DAREN R. COON, SECRETARY/TREASURER
NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
DRC/dnm
cc: File
Water Superintendent
The Development Group
enc.
APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000
BOISE PRO1ECi RIGHTS • 40,000
•
•
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING: FEBRUARY 8, 1994
APPLICANT: DEVELOPMENT GROUP AND AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 4
JUB ENGINEERS
REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR
ELK RUN SUBDIVISION NO. 2
AGENCY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
ADA STREET NAME COMMITTE:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
~l~ ~
C ~~ ~,~
~~/~
ro~~ C ~
~~p ~l
Q~ph"Me ~iY"'~rar~
r ~~
~~
~`P~
OTHER:
OFFICIALS
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk
JANICE L. GASS. City Treasurer
GARY 0. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer
BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt.
JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt.
KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief
W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief
WAYNE G. GROOKSTON, JR., Attorney
MEMORANDUM
•
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live COUNCIL MEMBERS
RONALD R. TOLSMA
CITY OF MERIDIAN B
R
WA
TW
MORROW
33 EAST IDAHO WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP
MERIDIAN IDAHO 83642 Planners Zoning Administrator
Phone 208 888433 • FAX 208 887-4813
( ) ( ) JIM JOHNSON
Chairman - Planning & Zoning
Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211
GRANT P. KINGSFORD
Mayor
January 8, 1994
TO; MAYOR, COUNCIL, PLANK G & ZONING
FROM; Gary D. Smith, PE r
RE; ELK RUN SUBD. N0.2
(Annexation, Zoning, Preliminary Plat)
I have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments for
your information and consideration as conditions of the applicant
during the hearing process:
1. The proposed subdivision is adjacent to an existing city limit
boundary.
2. Submit street name approval from Ada County.
3. Sanitary sewer line needs to extended along S.H. 69 from Lot
12-Block 4 to the south boundary.
4. Some relocation of the street lights and fire hydrants shown
may be necessary.
5. An all-weather surface needs to be provided over the sewer line
exiting So. Gull Cove P1. to Hwy. 69. The 20 foot easement shall
be changed to a fenced common are lot to preclude any other use.
A removable type barrier shall be installed to prevent general
vehicle access.
6. What is the piping status of the Kennedy Lateral?
7. What information is available regarding the depth to the
highest seasonal groundwater elevation on this property?
8. Show the referenced benchmark for the contours shown.
9. A temporary turn-a-round should be built at the south end of So.
Covey Ave.
10. A part of the subdivision area shown north of W. Calderwood
St. is a resubdivision of Lots 4,5-Block 1, Elk Run Subd. No.l.
11. A policy decision question exists concerning extension of the
city water line along the east side of Hwy. 69. This needs to be
•
addressed by the City Council.
,~ ~ ~ • •
I~ECEI~IED
JAN 1 0 194
C~'y OF MERIDIAN
Z ~
m~
~o `~
o
O
~ ~
~ c~
D
m ~,
m
~rn
~ ~
~ O
'P
~v~
,~J u f •
January 4, 1994
Mr. Will Berg, City Clerk
City of Meridian
33 E. Idaho Street
Meridian, ID 83642
Dear Will:
RECEIVED
JAN - 6 194
CITY OF MERIDIAN
Re: ELK RUN NO. 2 SUBDIVISION
Revised Preliminary Plat
250 S. Beechwood Avenue, Suite 201
Boise, ID 83709-0944
208/376-7330
FAX: 208/323-9336
Ada County Highway District has reviewed the Preliminary Plat for
Elk Run No. 2 Subdivision and have suggested two modifications to
the plat, which we and the developer concur with. The first item is
to re-configure the lot design between South Covey Avenue and South
Riptide Place to eliminate Lot 7 from fronting onto West Calderwood
Street, which will be a Collector Street. The second item is to add
a second stub street to the southwest boundary at the end of South
Covey Avenue.
Enclosed for your review and comment are ten copies of the revised
preliminary plat showing the recommended modifications reduced to
8-1/2" x 11". I will also forward a copy of this modified plan to
the City Engineer. If you have any questions, please call.
Sincerely,
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
~~/`~
Gary Lee, P.E./L.S.
Project Manager
GAL:ls
Enclosure
cc: Bill Hardt, The Development Group
Project No. 18530
J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc.
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS
W
W
d
c
~j e
1~+ ~ V1 ~
n ~ K
...1 _
f ~. ~~ ~ As~ z~~ e
~~ A i ~ W
~ ~#~i~f~sF ~ s
. ~ * e~
~8 ~
~~ I~I~~~~~,il~ f ~~ ~e~ ~~~:
v ~~ ~, ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ i
j r
1 ! j i ~ i=
b ~ j ]j
• _
t~ ~~, ~!~ ~~~~~J ~~, f ~~ ~ ;~ ij ~
i ~~~~ r} j ~ ~
~B1 Iii ,i~ :~:lZt ?~, ~;11 , ~: ~t j A
k
's l
~ i ~ sA
'a:a'p~ ls~8s~
~ -
.,~
!
!- 1 _ r
~ o-~ ~1 ~~~~~ ~
1 i 1t t '- ~
1 ^ y
i= ^ t
I . ,~ ~ a=~
• '"'' n Z
1 i ~-ri 'air ~ - z' - - it ~;
j a
3 I^ 1 f .g. , s
1 ~.~
`! 1 - - i ~ ~
i i a - -
1 ~ "' "' ~
1
~,
1 _,~
_.._
*'loln
I~
x (e
~~ _
a8 e" •
i~;aa~ i
~~~~~~ ~l[ YI 7 ~ FI~F11.0
~. O
- ~4 S
e
~' I
~~
Q .~- ~
C~
~w ca ~
~ .-- ~
~ ~
V
o ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
.,
w
v
W
Q
LL, o
"~
o O
~ W
s
U
Z
•
~I
~,
`~
O
vii
~~
~~
H
U
W
m
'•
J
~ !
~1
°J
2
~ ~
~:.
~ ~
~~
`~
~ ~
~ v
~~
1
~-~
s
. ~Op~
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
DEVELOPMENT GROUP
ANNERATION AND ZONING
A PORTION OF THE N.E. 1/4 OF
SECTION 24, T.3 N., R.1 W., B.M.
ELR RUN SUBDIVISION NO. 2
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The above entitled annexation and zoning application having
come on for consideration on January 11, 1994, at the hour of 7:30
o'clock p.m. on said date, at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho
Street, Meridian, Idaho, and the Council having heard and taken
oral and written testimony and the Applicants appearing through
their engineer, Gary Lee, and having duly considered the matter,
the Planning and Zoning Commission. makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That notice of public hearing on the annexation and zoning
was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said
public hearing scheduled for January 11, 1994, the first
publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing;
that the matter was duly considered at the January 11, 1994,
hearing; that the public was given full opportunity to express
comments and submit evidence; and that copies of all notices were
made available to newspaper, radio and television stations;
2. That the property included in the application for
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 1
•
annexation and zoning is described in the application, and by this
reference is incorporated herein; that the property is
approximately 16.28 acres in size.
3. That the property is presently zoned by the county as R-T
(Rural Transition); that the Applicant requests that the majority
of the property be zoned R-4 with a small portion, .70 of an acre
zoned R-8, which portion is adjacent to that portion of Elk Run
Subdivision No. 1 which is zoned R-8 and stated that the use
proposed would be for proper residential as dictated by the
respective zone.
4. The general area surrounding the property is used
agriculturally and residentially; that the property to the north is
used residentially; that there is R-4 residential property to the
east across the Meridian/Kuna Highway; the property to the south is
agricultural.
5. That the property is adjacent and abutting to the present
City limits.
6. The Applicant is the owner of record of the property and
has requested this annexation and zoning and the application is not
at the request of the City of Meridian.
7. That the property included in the annexation and zoning
application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian.
8. That the parcel of ground requested to be annexed is
presently included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area
(U.S.P.A.) as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the
Meridian Comprehensive Plan; that the property is included within
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 2
• •
the area designated in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as a Single
Family Residential area
9. There were no property owners, or anyone else, appearing
at the hearing to object to the application.
10. That the Applicants representative indicated that the
intended development of the property is for single family
dwellings; in the subdivision application it is represented that
the lots zoned R-4 would have a minimum of 8,000 square feet per
lot and that the lots zoned R-8 would have a minimum square footage
of 6,500 square feet; and that the value range would be between
$85,000.00 and $125,000.00.
11. The Applicant's representative stated at the hearing that
there would be 42 single family dwellings, a 2.6 density per acre.
1370 square feet to 2,200 square feet in each dwelling, a common
space of for landscape buffer, that lots would be landscaped and
fenced, that the developer agrees with the comments of the City
Engineer but desired clarification on one regarding the water line
near Highway 69; that there would be no school site within the
subdivision but that they had no disagreement with the letter from
the Meridian School District, that in the area zoned R-4 there
would be 80 feet of frontage and 1,400 square feet in the
dwellings; that the tiling of the Kennedy. required as a condition
under Elk Run No. 1, would be completed as part of Elk Run No. 2.
12. That in the Rural Area section of the Comprehensive Plan,
Land Use, Rural Areas, Section 6.3, it does state that land in
agricultural activity should so remain in agricultural activity
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 3
•
until urban services can be provided.
13. That Meridian has, and is, experiencing a population
increase; that there are pressures on land previously used for
agricultural uses to be developed into residential subdivision
lots.
14. That the property can be physically serviced with City
water and sewer.
15. Meridian Police Department, Meridian Fire Department,
Meridian City Engineer, Meridian School District, Ada County
Highway District, Ada Street Name Committee, the Central District
Health Department, Nampa Meridian Irrigation District, and the
Meridian Planning Director submitted comments and such are
incorporated herein as if set forth in full.
16. That the R-4, Residential District is described in the
Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 3 as follows:
(R-4) LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT: The purpose of
the (R-4) District is to permit the establishment of low
density single-family dwellings, and to delineate those
areas where predominantly residential development has, or
is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan
or the City, and to protect the integrity of residential
areas by prohibiting the intrusion of incompatible non-
residential uses. The (R-4) District allows for a
maximum of four ( 4 ) dwellings units per acre and requires
connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems of
the City of Meridian.";
that the R-4 zoning district requires a minimum of 1,400 square
feet to be included in houses in that zone; that the R-8,
Residential District is described in the Zoning Ordinance, 11-2-408
B. 4 as follows:
"(R-81 Medium Density Residential District: The purpose of
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 4
• •
the (R-8) Districts is to permit the establishment of single
and two (2) family dwellings at a density not exceeding eight
(8) dwelling units per acre. This district delineates those
areas where such development has or is likely to occur in
accord with the Comprehensive Plan of the City and is also
designed to permit the conversion of large homes into two (2)
family dwellings in well-established neighborhoods of
comparable land use. Connection to the Municipal Water and
Sewer systems of the City of Meridian is required."
17. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use,
Residential Policies, 2.1U states as follows:
"Support a variety of residential. categories (urban, rural,
single-family, multi-family, townhouses, apartments,
condominiums, etc.) for the purpose of providing the City with
a range of affordable housing opportunities."
18. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use,
Rural Areas, 6.3 c., it states as follows:
"Within the Urban Service Planning Area development may occur
in densities as low as 3 dwellings per acre if physical
connection is made to existing City of Meridian water and
sewer service and the property is platted and subdivided .
.'
19. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Land Use,
Rural Areas, 6.4, it states as follows:
"Residential development is allowed in the rural area provided
that said development does not exceed the Rural Residential
Agricultural density, unless it is inside the Urban Service
Planning Area and City sewer and water is provided, then Low,
Medium and High density residential may be considered. All
residential development must also comply with the other
appropriate sections of this plan."
20. That the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, under Housing,
Housing Policies, at page 66, it states as follows:
"1.1 The City of Meridian intends to provide for a wide
diversity of housing types (single-family, modular, mobile
homes, multi-family, townhouses, apartments, condominiums."
"1.3 An open housing market for all persons, regardless of
race, sex, age, religion or ethnic background."
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 5
• •
"1.4 The development of housing for all income groups close
to employment and shopping centers should be encouraged."
21. That there is a population influx into the City of
Meridian at the present time which has been going on for some time
and is likely to continue; that the land is relatively close to
Meridian and economic conditions are making it difficult to
continue farming in the area.
22. That the City Engineer has previously submitted comment
in different applications that a determination of ground water
level and subsurface soil conditions should be made; that such a
comment is equally applicable to this Application.
23. That the Planning Director, Wayne Forrey, commented that
the R-4 request complied with the Comprehensive Plan, that the
developer should extend the Meridian Road sewer trunk line to the
south side of the Kennedy lateral to facilitate business
development south of this project; the director also stated that
the Meridian School District was attempting to secure an elementary
school site next to Meridian Greens Subdivision to serve Elk Run
and other subdivisions in the area and that development of this
subdivision should include a development agreement which stipulates
that an adequate school site has been acquired by the School
District before final plat approval of Elk Run No. 2.; that the
City received a copy of a letter mailed to The Development Company
which stated that this development is adjacent to the Kuna/Meridian
Road and is too small for a school and the District is not
interested in locating a school in this subdivision.
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 6
• •
That in prior requests for annexation and zoning the Director
has commented that annexation could be conditioned on a development
agreement including an impact fee to help acquire a future school
or park sites to serve the area and that annexations should be
subject to impact fees for park, police, and fire services as
determined by the city and designated in an approved development
agreement.
24. The Meridian School District submitted comment and such
is incorporated herein as if set forth in full; its comment was
that there is no excess capacity in the schools of the District and
that residents of the new subdivision could not be assured of
attending the neighborhood schools; the School District asked for
support for a development fee or a transfer fee to help offset the
costs of building additional schools.
25. That in 1992 the Idaho State Legislature passed
amendments to the Local Planning Act, which in 67-6513 Idaho Code,
relating to subdivision ordinances, states as follows:
"Each such ordinance may provide for mitigation of the effects
of subdivision development on the ability of political
subdivisions of the state, including school districts, to
deliver services without compromising quality of service
delivery to current residents or imposing, substantial
additional costs upon current residents to accommodate the
subdivision.";
that the City of Meridian is concerned with the increase in
population that is occurring and with its impact on the City being
able to provide fire, police, emergency health care, water, sewer,
parks and recreation services to its current residents and to those
moving into the City; the City is also concerned that the increase
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - ~
• •
in population is burdening the schools of the Meridian School
District which provide school service to current and future
residents of the City; that the City knows that the increase in
population does not sufficiently increase the tax base to offset
the cost of providing fire, police, emergency health care, water,
sewer, parks and recreation services; and the City knows that the
increase in population does not provide sufficient tax base to
provide for school services to current and future students.
26. That pursuant to the instruction, guidance, and direction
of the Idaho State Legislature, the City may impose either a
development fee or a transfer fee on residential property, which if
possible would be retroactive and apply to all residential lots in
the City, because of the imperilment to the health, welfare, and
safety of the citizens of the City of Meridian.
27. That Section 11-9-605 C states as follows:
"Right-of-way for pedestrian walkways in the middle of long
blocks may be required where necessary to obtain convenient
pedestrian circulation to schools, parks or shopping areas;
the pedestrian easement shall be at least ten feet (10')
wide."
28. That Section 11-9-605 G 1. states as follows:
"Planting strips shall be required to be placed next to
incompatible features such as highways, railroads, commercial
or industrial uses to screen the view from residential
properties. Such screening shall be a minimum of twenty feet
(20') wide, and shall not be a part of the normal street right
of way or utility easement."
29. That Section 11-9-605 H 2. states as follows:
"Existing natural features which add value to residential
development and enhance the attractiveness of the community
(such as trees, watercourses, historic spots and similar
irreplaceable amenities) shall be preserved in the design of
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW page - $
• •
the subdivision;"
30. That Section 11-9-605 K states as follows:
"The extent and location of lands designed for linear open
space corridors should be determined by natural features and,
to lesser extent, by man-made features such as utility
easements, transportation rights of way or water rights of
way. Landscaping, screening or lineal open space corridors
may be required for the protection of residential properties
from adjacent arterial streets, waterways, railroad rights of
way or other features. As improved areas (landscaped), semi-
improved areas (a landscaped pathway only), or unimproved
areas (left in a natural state), linear open space corridors
serve:
1. To preserve openness;
2. To interconnect park and open space systems within
rights of way for trails, walkways, bicycle ways;
3. To play a major role in conserving area scenic and
natural value, especially waterways, drainages and
natural habitat;
4. To buffer more intensive adjacent urban land uses;
5. To enhance local identification within the area due
to the internal linkages; and
6. To link residential neighborhoods, park areas and
recreation facilities."
31. That Section 11-9-605 L states as follows:
Bicycle and pedestrian pathways shall be encouraged within new
developments as part of the public right of way or as separate
easements so that an alternate transportation system (which is
distinct and separate from the automobile) can be provided
throughout the City Urban Service Planning Area. The
Commission and Council shall consider the Bicycle-Pedestrian
Design Manual for Ada County (as prepared by Ada County
Highway District) when reviewing bicycle and pedestrian
pathway provisions within developments.
32. That the Applicant submitted an application for
preliminary plat along with the application for annexation and
zoning which application included a preliminary plat.
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 9
~ • •
33. That proper notice was given as required by law and all
procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission were given and
followed.
CONCLUSIONS
1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local
Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have
been met; including the mailing of notice to owners of property
within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicant's
property.
2. That the City of Meridian has authority to annex land
pursuant to 50-222, Idaho Code, and Section 11-2-417 of the Revised
and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian; that exercise of
the City's annexation authority is a Legislative function.
3. That the Planning and Zoning Commission has judged this
annexation and zoning use application under Idaho Code, Section 50-
222, Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Meridian City
Ordinances, Meridian Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the record
submitted to it and things of which it can take judicial notice.
4. That all notice and hearing requirements set forth in
Title 67, Chapter 65, Idaho Code, and the Ordinances of the City of
Meridian have been complied with.
5. That the Commission may take judicial notice of
government ordinances, and policies, and of actual conditions
existing within the City and State.
6. That the land within the proposed annexation is
contiguous to the present City limits of the City of Meridian, and
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 10
•
the annexation would not be a shoestring annexation.
7. That the annexation application has been initiated by the
Applicant, owners of the property, and is not upon the initiation
of the City of Meridian.
8. That since the annexation and zoning of land is a
legislative function, the City has authority to place conditions
upon the annexation of land.
9. That the development of annexed land must meet and comply
with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and in particular
Section 11-9-616, which pertains to development time schedules and
requirements, and Section 11-9-605 M., which pertains to the tiling
of ditches and waterways.
10. That this Application has been submitted prior to the
adoption of the proposed amendment to the Meridian Comprehensive
Plan; that as a condition of annexation the Applicant must agree
that the Meridian Comprehensive Plan shall apply to the land and
any development.
11. That the Applicant's property is in compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan, and therefore the annexation and zoning
Application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
12. That the requirements of the Meridian City Engineer,
including those he specifically stated in his comments and those
stated herein in these Findings and Conclusions, and of the Ada
County Highway District, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District,
Meridian Fire Department, and the comments of the Meridian Planning
Director, except for any requirement that a school site must be
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 11
i • •
located in the Applicant's proposed subdivision, shall be met and
addressed in a development Agreement.
13. That all ditches, canals, and waterways shall be tiled as
a condition of annexation and if not so tiled the property shall be
subject to de-annexation.
14. That the Applicant will be required to connect to
Meridian water and sewer and resolve how the water and sewer mains
will serve the land; that the development of the property shall be
subject to and controlled by the Subdivision and Development
Ordinance; that, as a condition of annexation, the Applicant shall
be require#d to enter into a development agreement as authorized by
11-2-416 L and 11-2-417 D; that the development agreement shall
address the inclusion into the subdivision of the requirements of
11-9-605 C, G 1, H 2, K, L and the comments of the Planning
Director, Wayne Forrey, except as noted herein regarding the
placement of a school within the proposed subdivision; that the
development agreement shall, as a condition of annexation, require
that the Applicant, or if required, any assigns, heirs, executors
or personal representatives, pay, when required, any impact,
development, or transfer fee, adopted by the City; that there shall
be no annexation until the requirements of this paragraph are met
or, if necessary, the property shall be subject to de-annexation
and loss of City services, if the requirements of this paragraph
are not met.
15. That the house size requirements for the R-4 and R-8
districts must be met and those representations of Applicants
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 12
•
representative made at the public hearing, which are recited in
Paragraph 10 of the Findings of Fact and houses must be constructed
at a value ~-}ae#~ee~i $85, 000.00 , as represented in
the application for subdivision approval.
16. That proper and adequate access to the property is
available and will have to be maintained.
17. That these conditions shall run with the land and bind
the applicant and its assigns.
18. With compliance of the conditions contained herein, the
annexation and zoning of R-4 and R-8 Residential would be in the
best interest of the City of Meridian.
19. That if these conditions of approval are ..aet met the
ho't
property shall be subject to de-annexation.
APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts and
approves these Findings of Fact and Conclusions.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONER HEPPER
COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE
COMMISSIONER SHEARER
COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI
CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER)
VOTED "y ~ ~-
VOTED
VOTED-~
VOTED- (~Jt~
VOTED
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 13
~, ,
•
DECISION AND RECOI~II~IENDATION
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends
to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the
annexation and zoning as stated above for the property described in
the application with the conditions set forth in these Findings of
Fact and Conclusions of Law and that the Applicant be specifically
required to the all ditches, canals and waterways, meet all of the
Ordinances of the City of Meridian, specifically including the
development time requirements, and enter into the required
development agreement, and that if the conditions are not met that
the property be de-annexed.
MOTION:
APPROVED: -~( DISAPPROVED:
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page - 14
~; t •
•
Planning & Zoning
January 11, 1994
Page 18
Johnson: Thank you Wayne, anything else for Mr. Smith?
Crookston: Do you know if your clients have any problem with
preserving that idea of a pathway plan along Nine Mile?
Smith: I believe they will be in favor of that, I think it
preserves the integrity of that subdivision it adds some aesthetic
value to the subdivision. I think with that 50 foot easement and
the amount of distance from that easement'to the top of the bank
there should be no problem with that.
Shearer: What can you tell us about the sidewalks on Ten Mile
between Candlelight and along in the front of your main subdivision
those are one going one way and one going the other way. I don't
know if you have noticed but a lot of people have called it to my
attention.
Smith: We noticed it, I don't know what happened to Candlelight
subdivision I know Parkwood Meadows and our subdivision and the
subdivision to the south of us Kentfield Manor their sidewalks
won't line up. I guess I can't offer any comment other than that.
Johnson: Thank you Brian, we may have some other questions of you.
Anyone from the public like to address the commission at this time
on this application? Seeing no one then I will close this public
hearing. We need Findings of Fact prepared gentlemen.
Alidjani: I will make the motion that we have the City Attorney
prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
Rountree: Second
Johnson: We have a motion for Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law, all in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #10: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH
A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ELK RUN SUBDIVISION NO. 2 BY THE DEVELOPMENT
GROUP AND JUB ENGINEERS:
Johnson:. I will now open the public hearing, if there is someone
representing the applicant that would like to come forward please
do so now. Hello Mr. Lee, you need to be sworn.
Gary Lee, JUB Engineers, 250 S Beechwood, Boise, was sworn by the
Attorney.
Lee: This request before you this evening is an annexation and a
,i ~ • •
.; ~
Planning & Zoning
January 11, 1994
Page 19
preliminary plat request for a parcel of land situated just south
of existing Elk Run subdivision no. 1 on Highway 69. It comprises
about 16 1/3 acres of irrigated pasture land right now with one
existing residential home on one side. At this time the property
is in the County and is zoned RT, the request before you is for an
R-8 zone on about 7/10 of an acre and R-4 zone on the balance. The
7/10 of an acre that is being requested R-8 abuts existing R-8
zoning of the first phase of existing Elk Run subdivision just
north of Calderwood as you can see on your 'preliminary plat. That
particular phase of the subdivision was designed with that in mind
in that culdesac. The overall development will consist of 42
single family residential lot with a gross density of about 2.6
lots per acre. The homes that will constructed within the
development will be similar to the ones that are in phase one of
Elk Run ranging in size of 1,370 to 2,200 square feet. There will
be a common open space lot constructed adjacent and parallel to
Highway 69 and allow for a landscape buffer between the roadway and
the residential development. The site will be serviced by existing
sanitary sewer and domestic water facilities are available in Elk
Run subdivision no. 1 we will continue the system through the
development for future developments to the south and the west. All
the street within the development will be public streets conforming
to ACRD requirements for local and collector. Calderwood Street
which is along the north boundary of phase 2 and the south
boundary of phase 1 is of collector status and it will line up with
the existing collector street across Highway 69. In your packets
there are some review comments from the Ada County Highway
District. One item in particular that is the access we had shown
in the original preliminary plat on Calderwood street. We have
since concurred with ACHD's findings and performed a little bit of
a redesign in that block to accommodate their wishes and that is to
eliminate a direct access onto Calderwood. I sent out a reduced
copy to the City Clerk last week and I think you probably have
those in your packets now. The street design basically stated the
same and we just shifted a few lots around and was able to
accomplish the configuration quite easily. Also ACHD requested that
one of the streets be extended to the south westerly boundary, we
had 3 culdescas going to the south now we have 2 with the center
street being a stub for future inter-neighborhood connections. All
the lots will be totally landscaped and fenced as they are
constructed. The developer of this project is also the home
builder and they have developed a complete package. There will be
a homeowners association established to maintain the landscape berm
along Highway 69. We have reviewed the comments from the City
Engineer and concur with what he stated in his review. There are
a couple of-items we'd like to get clarification on and one of
those is the requirement for a common lot for the sewer line tat is
going through .the subdivision. We had originally shown it as an
easement we prefer to leave it as an easement for maintenance
;Y
• •
Planning & Zoning
January 11, 1994
Page 20
We believe if it is a common lot it will be fenced off and probably
be a place to catch trash and weeds. If it is a landscaped
easement it will be maintained by the homeowner. And there are
some questions about how the water line will be extended along
Highway 69 and there are some policy decisions that he needs to
make concerning that item. And we certainly would like to get
clarification on that as well. There was a comment made by they
City Planner, Wayne Forrey, about schools. Apparently there is a
need for a school site to the east of the project near Meridian
Greens, and there was a statement in his response that the
developer enter into a development agreement which stipulates that
adequate school site be acquired by the school district before the
final plat is approved. And we read that to mean that the
developer will enter into a agreement and not that the site will be
acquired prior to the signing of this plat. And if there is a
different way of interpreting this I would like to know that. If
you have any questions I will be glad to answer them for you.
Johnson: Thank you Gary, any questions for Gary Lee?
Rountree: I had a question, why the different zoning from an R-8
to an R-4, it looks like all the lot sizes will meet an R-4 with
the changes you made.
Lee: There in the very upper portion next to South Gull, lot 39
and block 1, its North Calderwood there is a 65 foot wide lot in
there. The northeast corner, and that portion of the property was
platted in phase 1 and there is a small corner that was not
included in the boundary because of the original homes site for the
Christensen property which they didn't own at the time otherwise it
would have been included in the first phase of the boundary. You
are right other than that one lot it would meet the minimum
requirement.
Johnson: Any other questions for Mr. Lee?
Hepper: Is that the only part that is going to have the R-8?
Lee: Yes it is
Hepper: Just that one lot?
Lee: Well, it is described as the corner where the existing house
is which a portion of lots 35, 36, and 38.
Hepper: So those lots to the east side of Elk Run No. 2 are
adjacent to the Highway over there those would all be R-4?
Planning & Zoning
January 11, 1994
Page 21
Lee: Everything to the north of Calderwood in this development
would be R-8, in phase 2.
Hepper: Everything north of Calderwood.
Lee: In just phase 2, a portion of phase 1 is R-8 and R-4.
Hepper: Everything north is R-8
Lee: There are 4 lots in there that are R-8 zoned.
Hepper: Everything south. of Calderwood is R-4, they would meet the
City's requirement for 1,400 square feet minimum?
Lee: Well the plan that. they are building .out there are ranging
between 1,370 and 2,200 with an average of 1,600 feet. I don't
know how many they have. planned at the 1,370 level maybe the
developer would have a better idea.
Hepper: In order to meet the City Ordinance they would have to
have a minimum of 1, 400 square feet in an R-4 designation. Just so
he is aware of that.
Johnson: Thank you Gary
Crookston: I have a question Gary, what is the status of the I
think it is the Kennedy Lateral?
Lee: Well the way I understand it the developer plans to finish
that project with phase 2 under his phase 2 budget.
Crookston: Phase 2 of this project or this project?
Lee: well, Elk Run no. 2
Johnson: Anyone else have any questions of Mr. Lee before I
dismiss him? Thanks Gary, this is a public hearing anyone else
from the public Iike to address the commission please do so now.
Gary Smith, I'd like you to comment on that #5 on your
recommendations please, maybe we can get a clarification there.
Smith: Mr. Chairman, members of the Planning & Zoning Commission,
this is a 12 inch diameter sewer line and it is serving quite a bit
of area to the south. My concern is that we maintain continued
access to the sewer lines that are outside of public right of ways.
To this I have been requesting the developers to provide a common
area lot that is designated for sewer line use only. Typically we
have requested that they provide an all weather surface that will
allow access across it. In this particular instance where we have
'~ ~..~
Planning & Zoning
January 11, 1994
Page 22
a manhole in the culdesac and another manhole on Highway 69 that is
not an absolute requirement. It could be landscaped but my concern
again is that it is preserved for our access to that sewer line.
If we don't do something to preserve that access than as lots are
sold and builders are building there is a strong possibility that
the easement will be built over. We lose control with what happens
in an easement and I can take you to several places. in town, we can
start at Meridian Ford where a sewer line runs underneath their
garage. We can go down Meridian Street to the church down here
across from Councilman Yerrington's place where the sewer line runs
underneath the main building. Go over on west 7th there is a shop
building that a guy built in the back of his yard over the top of
a 24 inch diameter intercept, it happens all the time. And that is
what I am trying to do preserve our access to the sewer line.
Johnson: How large will this common lot have to be?
Smith: We have been requesting a 20 foot
Johnson: The same size as an easement?
Smith: Well, it would be yes, it would b
easement in a common lot. I would be platted a
area it would be taken care of by the homeowners
I say in this particular case it wouldn't be an
to have an all weather surface because we can't
both ends of it because of the short distance.
inch diameter or the possibility of it plugging
inch lateral.
Johnson: Thank you Gary
e a sanitary sewer
s a lot as a common
association. Like
absolute necessity
access a manhole on
It could be a 12
up in a standard 8
Rountree: What is the situation with the water lines?
Smith: Well the situation is that our water master plan requires
that we have a grid network of pipes installed in such that we have
a 12 inch diameter line on section line roads and a minimum 8 inch
diameter line crossing at mid sections lines. Where we get into
arterial roads, minor arterial roads that we find on section lines
all the time, then the problem, becomes how do you continue these
water mains. If you don't continue them through an adjacent
subdivision street so it can jump out onto an arterial as an access
it is going to be very difficult for the next guy tot he south of
this development to come back in the water line, how far does he
have to come to get it. They City's policy in the past has been
that a developer extends sewer and water to his property and
through his property so that the next developer can get a hold of
it and extend it on to his development. We continue to have
<::
Planning & Zoning
January il, 1994
Page 23
problems with corner properties as to how much the developer
installs where he doesn't really have a need for the line but yet
the next developer does. And they have to be able to get a hold of
it without going a great distance to do this. In this particular
case with the access to this subdivision through Calderwood you
have a pretty good distance to the south boundary I think that is
something that we as a City need to address and define a policy
that is a little clearer than what it is now. Because right now it
is a little bit fuzzy a little bit arbitrary and I think it can be
defined a lot better so in all aspects the development community
knows what they need to do. I guess this just kind of pointed out
a little emphasis on the problems that exist.
Johnson: Where would you require this common lot in the past and
what has been your experience with maintenance keeping the leaks
down and that sort of thing.
Smith: Well, so far our requirements on these common lots are still
in the development stages and we don't really have any that have
been under use since we have been requiring it and since these
subdivisions have been developing.
Johnson: This is a recent thing.
Smith: And like I said we tried to stay away from it as much as
possible and only if there was no other way to serve the
subdivision that is the only time I will look at and consider it.
In this particular case it is a matter again of running a sewer
line down Highway 69 and also installing sewer line in the
subdivision street. The sewer line on Highway 69 has no use to the
developer at all. It is a problem when you have a double fronting
lot situation.
Johnson: Thank you Gary, Mr. Forrey would you comment please with
respect to Mr. Lee's concern regarding,. really a clarification as
to whether the development agreement is an agreement or a
requirement.
Forrey: Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, when Gary re-
stated his interpretation I re-read and I could see where you would
draw that conclusion. My intent in writing that statement in the
staff report was that prior to final plat approval by the City
Council that a adequate school site be either secured or in the
process of being obtained by the School District and that would be
spelled out in a development agreement. The situation in this
particular part of the community is becoming real acute with the
School district. Several years ago the district never anticipated
that there would be much more development than just around Meridian
Greens, in fact I think the School District has mentioned several
,; • •
t.Py
!~`';~
Planning & Zoning
January 11 , 1994
Page 24
times that they were surprised that the project was successful.
They had in their mind why would people live south of the
Interstate and so they never put in a elementary school into that
formula. And now it is an active growth area it is important area
a good neighborhood to live in but there are is no school. And so
tonight on the agenda I think there are 3 or 4 projects in this
area and there is more land coming in on Preliminary plats so the
School District has specifically asked that the City hold off any
final plat approval until they get a school site secured. Now they
are looking at 2 areas and Mr. Marty Goldsmith is a key player in
his Sagehen Estates, he has by letter agreed to donate a portion or
provide a portion of a school site in section 20 about a mile east
of this Elk Run. And that satisfy one area of the school district
but they are still looking for a school site just directly south of
Meridian Greens in about the center of section 19 and that would be
the school that would serve Elk Run. So at this point the School
District is saying let us catch our breath a little bit, they are
in active negotiations and they are probably close to getting a
school site but until they do they have asked that we take that
into consideration. So my intent was proceed with the preliminary
plat but no final plat approval until the school district gives us
the green light when they have a site. That is probably not good
news for the developer but that was our intent.
Johnson: Thank you Mr. Forrey
Hepper: Is there any designations in that area for City Parks or
neighborhood parks?
Forrey: Yes, with that school site there would be a 5 acre
neighborhood park and that is, we are doing that with the school
district, looking at the amount of Land they would require for a
neighborhood park as well.
Hepper:' Some of these subdivisions are having parks within the
subdivision, is there any type of status requirement on that, so
may lots it works out nice to have a lot designated as a
subdivision park or anything?
Forrey: Mr. Chairman and Commissioner Hepper, it does. Some of
the larger proposals lend themselves to a donation that may be of
a meaningful space of a park. This Elk Run is quite small and it is
also at the extreme western edge of the sewer boundary there is not
much property west of Elk Run that will develop on the Meridian
Road trunk so we are really focusing on a school site across the
highway which is unfortunate for having to cross but the school and
the park will most likely be south of Meridian Greens and that
would the park that these children and citizens would use. It is
iy1 ~ ~ • •
Planning & Zoning
January 11, 1994
Page 25
not a good situation but it time I think there will. be a park in
the other section west of Elk Run that will take another sewer
trunk and that will be several years before that area develops.
Sagehen Estates and Upland Meadows we're actively talking to Mr.
Goldsmith about a neighborhood park.
Johnson: Thank you Wayne, Mr. Lee, any concluding remarks? Does
anyone else have anything else, I thought I closed it. I will
formerly close the public hearing. What would you like to do?
Rountree: I move that we have Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law prepared particularly emphasizing the situation with the sewer
and water.
Shearer: Second
Johnson: Its moved and seconded we have the City Attorney prepare
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law with special emphasis, all
in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All yea
ITEM #11: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A REZONE FROM R-8 TO L-O BY
ROBERT AND FRAM WHITMIRE:
(Meeting adjourned for a 10 minute break)
Johnson: I'll now open the public hearing is there someone
representing the applicant that would like to address the
Commission please come forward.
Sheryl Ott-Ward, 4258 White Ash Drive, was sworn by the Attorney.
Ott-Ward: The property that we are proposing the zone change on is
located just west of Meridian Road on Cherry Lane an area of mixed
residential and commercial use. Within a 2 block radius there are
several small businesses Meridian Family Chiropractic and a number
of others. We feel this property would be compatible with these
other small businesses that have minimal traffic flow as this owner
schedules their clients on an appointment basis. The circle
driveway offers easy off access on Cherry Lane and feels that it
would not impede the traffic flow there. In reviewing the
Comprehensive Plan for the City of Meridian we feel that it would
meet the long term goals of the City. We request your approval on
this application. I'd be happy to answer any questions that you
have.
Johnson: Thank you very much, any questions of Miss Ward?
QqN
DATE: ~ ~ I /MERIDIAN PLANNING ZONING
AGENDA I TEM NUMBER ~ ~ APPL T CANT : C./VI"~-F ~C~L ~ac„J ~ `Z
AGENCY
COMMENTS:
tt n ~ ~.
MERIDIAN POLICE - KS~
MERIDIAN F IRE DEPT. - l~ C~''~"'~
MERIDIAN CITY ENGINEER - ~`
MERIDIAN ATTORNEY -
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE -
MERIDIAN SCHOOL D I STR I CT - ~-Q-Q- ~"
MERIDIAN BUILDING DEPT. -
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
ADA STREET NAME COMMITTEE -
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH -
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION -
SETTLERS IRRIGATION -
IDAHO POWER -
US WEST -
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS -
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION -
MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY -
MERIDIAN PLANNING DIRECTOR -
la-s-e a,~-~.~,,1 4~,-..a,~
~ aka-~-~ .~
~ ~~
.~ ~~I ~
~,~ ~I~
P ~- ~
~~~
OTHER COMMENTS:
OFFICIALS
WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Cterk
JANICE GASS, Treasurer
BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt.
WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney
JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt.
KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief
BILL GORDON, Police Chief
GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY.
A Good Place to Live
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
Phone (208)888-4433
FAX (208) 887-4813
GRANT P. KINGSFORD
Mayor
COUNCILMEN
RONALD R. TOLSM/
ROBERT GIESLER
MAX YERRINGTON
ROBERT D. CORRIE
Chairman Zoning 6 Plani
JIM JOHNSON
Centennial Coordinate
PATSY FEDRIZZI
TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your com ents and recommendations will be
considered by the Meridian ~~
may we have your answer by : .$ / q 4 Y
~~~~~~~D
TRANSMITTAL DATE : 12. " 2 ~! 3 _ - • HEARING
R E O U E 5 T : r~'1^-nit ~~ 0~. C~.,~ j ? ~,•~~. _ ` 'C~.~„ _d T/IGJ~e
D E ~ - ~ 193
BY:
CIT'E` ~~~ E~.~yY~6AN
DATE: I lI '9y
U~
A.~~4 -
Q~,.~~.tc-t'~.
~,._`~, 2
u
LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: ~ ~ c~~
JIM JOHNSON P/Z MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
MOE ALIDJANI,P11 MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
JIM SHEARER, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DLSIRICT
CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION
TIM HEPPER, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR..DISTRICT
RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT
BOB CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO`~(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
BOB GIESLER, C/C U.S. WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
MAX YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLA15)
BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. CITY FILES
BUILDING INSPECTOR OTHER:
FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS:
POLICE DEPARTMENT
CITY ATTORNEY
GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER
WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER