Dorado Development / Sciscoe RZ• HUB OF TREASURE VALLEI•
A Good Place to Live
OFFICIALS
WAYNES.FORREY,PICP,CityClerk
JANICE GASS, Treasurer CITY OF MERIDIAN
BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt.
WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO
JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water supt.
KENNY BOWERS. Fire Chief MERIDIAN
,IDAHO 83642
BILL GORDON. Police Chief Phone (208) 888-4433
GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4813
GRANT P. KINGSFORD
Mayor
COUNCILMEN
RONALD R. TOLSMA
ROBERT GIESLER
MAX YERRINGTON
ROBERT D. CORRIE
Chairman Zoning 6 Planning
JIM JOHNSON
Centennial Coordinator
PATSY FEDRIZZI
TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your co ments and recommendations will be
considered by the Met-idian~ ~ Cavr\; s ,
may we have your answer by: q
TRANSMITTAL DATE: C~C`~EjQt IS L9g~ .:;NE:ARING DATE: ~byew~~ °~)9-9'3
r
REQUEST : ~ ZOO F `~'~'~w~ ~',. l'I~ "'~.O ~ eA'~2.na ~ Cpr-,»~,er~.i q.l CC G~
BY:
LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR RF70JECT~: ZZ 1 O ~ • I'ylPrit~/Qe~ ~[](
JIM JOHNSON P/Z MERIDIAN SGHOOL DISTRICT
MOE ALIDJANI,PlZ MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
JIM SHEARER, P/I ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DLSTRICT
,;::•,
CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION
TIM HEPPER, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR..DISTRICT
RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION-DISTRICT
BOB CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER.CO'°:-(PRELIM AND fINAI PLAiS)
BOB GIESLER, C/C ~ S•: WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
MAX~YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. CITY FILES
BUILDING INSPECTOR OTHER:
FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS:
POLICE DEPARTMENT
CITY ATTORNEY
6ARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER
WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER
•
~J
_. , .4-„
.. J
APPLIATION FOR ANNEXATION APPROVAL &
ZONING OR REZONE
MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
FILING INFORMATION
N/A
(PROPOSED NAME OF SUBDIVISION)
;t
i
2210 N. Meridian Road
(GENERAL LOCATION)
Legal Attached
(LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ATTACH IF LENGTHY)
Dorado Development Co_, Tnc_ - Rnh Angall 344-6511
(OWNER(S) OF RECORD) (NAME) (TELEPHONE N0.)
168 N. Ninth St., Suite 250, Box 2666, Boise, ID 83701
(ADDRESS)
Dorado Development Co./Michael and Cvnthia Sciscoe (345-1343)
(APPLICANT) (NAME) (TELEPHONE NO.)
See above /1711 No. 30th, Boise, Tn R~~n~
(ADDRESS)
N/A
(ENGINEER, SURVEYOR OR PLANNER) (NAME) (TELEPHONE NO.)
N/A
(ADDRESS)
City of Meri c3i an
(JURISDICTION(S) REQUIRING APPROVAL)
Commercial
(TYPE OF SUBDIVISION - RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL)
+50 .95 approx. ACRES OF LAND IN CONTIGUOUS
OWNERSHIP.
(ACCEPTED BY:) (FEE)
. • •
THESE ARE ITEMS NEEDED FOR ANNEXATION & ZONING REQUESTS
1. Name, address and phone number of applicant;
2. Name, address and phone number of owner of subject property,
and proof of title in said owner;
3. Notarized request for zoning amendment from titled owner,
successor of said owner, or valid title option holder or
contract purchaser with consent from the titled owner if not
requested by the titled owner;
4. Legal description of property;
5. Legal description of all adjoining rights-of-way, railroads,
roadways, highways and easements the full length of the
property;
6. Present land use;
7. Proposed land use; UvCz ~~~ z
8. Present district;
9. Proposed district;
i~\\
~~,id,. Characteristics of subject property which make the zoning
~~~ amendment desirable;
..~li. Necessity or desirability of development pertaining to the
zoning amendment and its harmony with adjacent development;
P~~ /9~
~~p~ 7 ~ 12 . one ( 1) map of sca 1 e one ( i ) i nch equal s one hundred (100 )
feet of the property concerning the zoning amendment;
13. Thirty (30} copies of a vicinity map of a scale of one (i)
inch equals three hundred (300) feet;
~~PC° ~ 14. A list of the mailing addresses of all property owners, from
authentic tax records of Ada County, who are within three
~dA P~DG~~~ Q hundred (300) feet of the external boundaries of the land
P h~e;~~S being considered, and all property owners included within the
L~D~~ ~~ property being considered;
~ ~
~~v>~ ~~~~~ i~ ~Pr~`A statement of how the proposed zoning amendment related to
Q ,~ ply the Meridian Comprehensive Plan;
lu as ti~~~ e
pa~d.co~~ 16. A fee as established by the Council; Less than 1 acre =
~~~~ $400.00; Over 1 acre = $400.00 + $15.00 per acre over portion
~~~~~ ,~~^ thereof . In addition i a above fee applicant shat 1 pay cost
~~~ of certified mailings at rate of $1.29 per notice.
17. The property will be posted 1 week before hearing stating they
have applied for a Conditional Use Permit or Zoning. There
must be a~signed affidavit that this has been done as part of
the application.
' ~ORADO DEVELOPMENT COMP~NY
(208) 344-651 1
Fax (208) 345-6321
October 14, 1993
City of Meridian
City Hall
Meridian, Idaho
(ZcZOnt
RE: Request
Gentlemen:
P.O. Box 2666
Boise, Idaho 83701
By the attached Affidavit of Legal Interest, I hereby grant to
Michael Sciscoe the right to apply and represent our interest, on
a rezoning application to the property owned by Dorado Development
Company in Meridian, Idaho, a legal description of which is
attached as well.
I also address items 10. and 11. to the questionnaire as follows:
10. The characteristic which makes this zoning amendment
desirable includes the fact that this parcel, currently
zoned R-15, will serve as a necessary buffer between
North Meridian Road and the approximate 6 acre parcel to
the east, also zoned R-15, which will in the future be
utilized for multi-family development. In addition, its
frontage on North Meridian Road and access from James
Court Lane make it a natural site for commercial
development.
11. The area to the south of the subject property is retail
and consists of the Cherry Shopping Center. The immediate
area to the south consists of a low income apartment
project. It is forecasted that like property, or property
lying along North Meridian Road in the area of the
subject property, will be developed into a combination of
office and perhaps some specialized retail buildings.
It is our intention to develop the subject parcel by
constructing an attractive single level office building
which would provide tenancy for professional usages such
as doctors or dentists, attorneys, real estate and/or
insurance agencies, etc. The property will be nicely
landscaped and will additionally provide a berm on its
eastern boundary to provide a physical separation to the
future multi-family project.
• r
Page Two
City of Meridian
October 14, 1993
Therefore, we would appreciate the City of Meridian considering
this rezoning request.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely yours,
Presi
RRA/mh
REZONE
Enclosure
October 13, 1993
Mr. Wayne Forrey
City of Meridian
33 E. Idaho
Meridian, ID 83642
Dear Mr. Forrey:
u
This letter shall serve as Michael and Cynthia Sciscoe's
formal request for zoning designation amendment from R-40 to CG.
Presently, the subject property consists of a vacent
residence on a one-half acre parcel. We would like to occupy
the home and are hereby requesting a rezone for the purpose of
operating our retail bookstore from a separate building located
on the property.
Curriculum Cottage, Inc., is family-owned and operated,
and we are in need of expanding. Having our store near our
residence enables us to earn income and remain a family at the
same time. Our teenagers work quite well alongside my wife in
managing the business in the afternoon, and she is able to
remain available to our younger children during the day, as well.
We offer curriculum which enables parents to enhance their
children's academic progress. Our customers vary from among:
1) parents desiring to tutor one-on-one, any particular
subjects their children are struggling with at
school,
2) parents choosing to home-educate for various reasons,
and
3) parents whose children are enrolled in special-ed classes
at school and whose teachers have recommended one-
on-one instruction at home.
We enjoyed residing in the City of Meridian sixteen years
ago and would like very much to return to this community. Also,
it will be an ideal central location for our growing Boise to Nampa/
Caldwell customer base. We also have customers who travel in
from further outlying Idaho and Oregon cities (Moscow to Idaho
Falls) since our products are not available locally otherwise.
(We specialize in complete curriculum, rather than simply
supplemental school supplies).
We also desire to relocate our small custom cabinetry and
furniture business onto the same property. This structure would
be attached to the far end of our bookstore. We plan to incorpor-
ate both businesses into one structure with a centrally located
office. Our bookstore is very active six months out of the year and
somewhat slower the remaining months, and our cabinetry business is
. ~ Page 2
a smaller business which employs only myself and one part-time
employee year round. (Presently, we rent a building for the
cabinetry business separately from our home in Boise). This
arrangement would greatly enable us to adjust our workloads for
both businesses accordingly.
We are working with a designer with the goal of building
a structure that is suitable in appearance for the proposed
development.
We are requesting the zoning for the following reasons:
A. The frontage on Meridian Road constitutes convenient
access for the public.
B. The property to the north is zoned CG already and
the property to the immediate south is also requesting
CG zoning herein. The owner has informed us of
his desire to delelop commercially, also. This fits
in with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
C. The proposed Comprehensive Plan designates this area
as Mixed-Use PUB, which allows quality commercial
development.
This type of home/business arrangement has been a much-
desired goal for our family for many years. Our cabinetry
business has supported our family for thirteen years. Now our
bookstore is enabling us to save resources for our future goals
(college tuitions, retirement, etc...).
We pray you will find favor in our request for rezoning.
Thank you for your time and consideration of this request.
Sincerely,
Michael and Cy~lthia Sciscoe
r
~. ~A~13 I2 2
II Ip g; 8, ~ 9 ~ S
.f. la y
3
~~~, Is 7ERBURY2EPAR ~ a a: z ~ ~ ,
+ 9L 16 2 '+
~ +~ +8 19 20 21 P~
22 2a.. .
1 I
1
~ I
4 I~f f
Is ~~~ I~
la
I ~ i
13 12 s i 4, f .~.., i I ~ +
11 ~ 3
SAS/q o s. a~~= I.~~ !-,,:.
to CFk, ~ ~ } i
y 8 p p0 ~0 e 7~ ,~ 2 _ ~` ~-
i •.,
9 6. _- ,1 -. I ~ - I Q
5 I ~ ,~'
7 ~ q , .; i~
6 a 2 ~ I
t~ I ~ e
~: wr~LOwBR00K , ~
a
r I6 15 I{ ~~~. .. ~~ ;. Q
' ,?-
~ ~ ~ N
3~ ~ ~ ~'
33 34 -
35 36 37 38 ~. ..~+:...~ .. .. i :.
-.----
',. ~ M,~... 'M.~.._~ .. ..'.i~_ j I .I
F
,~
4!~
-3 - ~
~F r
m:
~;
a~
- ~~
M
' ~ ~ s~4 '. _.. ~ ~ i
I ~ ~ \
1
` ~¢- ' I ~
. ,
• . ,. ~
PROPOSED PROPERTY FOR REZONE
/3.f~o z
~i
~ N
Q ~
~ ~
~q
/32../3
TA/rl2S CT
I~
-s'c.oL€ /~'_ moo'
RECEIVED
O C T 1 4 1993
CI'CY OF ~4FRIDIAN
APPLIATION FOR ANNEXATION APPROVAL &
ZONING OR REZONE
MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FILING INFORMATION
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
N/A
(PROPOSED NAME OF SUBDIVISION)
2210 N. Meridian Road
(GENERAL LOCATION)
Legal Attached
(LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ATTACH IF LENGTHY)
Dorado Development Co Tnc - Rnh Angell 344-6511
(OWNER(S) OF RECORD) (NAME) (TELEPHONE N0.)
168 N Ninth St Suite 250, Box 2666. Boise, ID 83701
(ADDRESS)
Dorado Development Co /Michael and Cynthia Sciscoe (345-1343)
(APPLICANT) (NAME) (TELEPHONE NO.)
See above /1711 No 30th, Rome, Tn R~~n~
(ADDRESS)
N/A
(ENGINEER, SURVEYOR OR PLANNER) (NAME) (TELEPHONE N0.)
N/A
(ADDRESS)
Cit~Y of M ri r~i an -
(JURISDICTION(Sj REQUIRING APPROVAL)
Commercial
(TYPE OF SUBDIVISION - RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL)
+50 .95 approx. ACRES OF LAND IN CONTIGUOUS
OWNERSHIP.
(ACCEPTED BY:) (FEE)
• RADO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
(208) 344-651 1
Fax (208) 345-6321
October 14, 1993
City of Meridian
City Hall
Meridian, Idaho
(Zt2oY1t
RE: Request
Gentlemen:
P.O. Box 2666
Boise, Idaho 83701
RECE~`~'~EI)
O C T 1 4 1993
c~~~~ t~~~ 7~~~~~ii;~~~r~
By the attached Affidavit of Legal Interest, I hereby grant to
Michael Sciscoe the right to apply and represent our interest, on
a rezoning application to the property owned by Dorado Development
Company in Meridian, Idaho, a legal description of which is
attached as well.
I also address items 10. and 11. to the questionnaire as follows:
10. The characteristic which makes this zoning amendment
desirable includes the fact that this parcel, currently
zoned R-15, will serve as a necessary buffer between
North Meridian Road and the approximate 6 acre parcel to
the east, also zoned R-15, which will in the future be
utilized for multi-family development. In addition, its
frontage on North Meridian Road and access from James
Court Lane make it a natural site for commercial
development.
11. The area to the south of the subject property is retail
and consists of the Cherry Shopping Center. The immediate
area to the south consists of a low income apartment
project. It is forecasted that like property, or property
lying along North Meridian Road in the area of the
subject property, will be developed into a combination of
office and perhaps some specialized retail buildings.
It is our intention to develop the subject parcel by
constructing an attractive single level office building
which would provide tenancy for professional usages such
as doctors or dentists, attorneys, real estate and/or
insurance agencies, etc. The property will be nicely
landscaped and will additionally provide a berm on its
eastern boundary to provide a physical separation to the
future multi-family project.
Page Two
City of Meridian
October 14, 1993
Therefore, we would appreciate the City of Meridian considering
this rezoning request.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely yours,
R6Sert~V R . ~An~el l
Preside
RRA/mh
REZONE
Enclosure
• •
October 13, 1993
Mr. Wayne Forrey
City of Meridian
33 E. Idaho
Meridian, ID 83642
Dear Mr. Forrey:
This letter shall serve as Michael and Cynthia Sciscoe's
formal request for zoning designation amendment from R-40 to CG.
Presently, the subject property consists of a vacent
residence on a one-half acre parcel. We would like to occupy
the home and are hereby requesting a rezone for the purpose of
operating our retail bookstore from a separate building located
on the property.
Curriculum Cottage, Inc., is family-owned and operated,
and we are in need of expanding. Having our store near our
residence enables us to earn income and remain a family at the
same time. Our teenagers work quite well alongside my wife in
managing the business in the afternoon, and she is able to
remain available to our younger children during the day, as well.
We offer curriculum which enables parents to enhance their
children's academic progress. Our customers vary from among:
1) parents desiring to tutor one-on-one, any particular
subjects their children are struggling with at
school,
2) parents choosing to home-educate for various reasons,
and
3) parents whose children are enrolled in special-ed classes
at school and whose teachers have recommended one-
on-one instruction at home.
We enjoyed residing in the City of Meridian sixteen years
ago and would like very much to return to this community. Also,
it will be an ideal central location for our growing Boise to Nampa/
Caldwell customer base. We also have customers who travel in
from further outlying Idaho and Oregon cities (Moscow to Idaho
Falls) since our products are not available locally otherwise.
(We specialize in complete curriculum, rather than simply
supplemental school supplies).
We also desire to relocate our small custom cabinetry and
furniture business onto the same property. This structure would
be attached to the far end of our bookstore. We plan to incorpor-
ate both businesses into one structure with a centrally located
office. Our bookstore is very active six months out of the year and
somewhat slower the remaining months, and our cabinetry business is
Page 2
u
a smaller business which employs only myself and one part-time
employee year round. (Presently, we rent a building for the
cabinetry business separately from our home in Boise). This
arrangement would greatly enable us to adjust our workloads for
both businesses accordingly.
We are working with a designer with the goal of building
a structure that is suitable in appearance for the proposed
development.
We are requesting the zoning for the following reasons:
A. The frontage on Meridian Road constitutes convenient
access for the public.
B. The property to the north is zoned CG already and
the property to the immediate south is also requesting
CG zoning herein. The owner has informed us of
his desire to delelop commercially, also. This fits
in with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
C. The proposed Comprehensive Pian designates this area
as Mixed-Use PUB, which allows quality commercial
development..
This type of home/business arrangement has been a much-
desired goal for our family for many years. Our cabinetry
business has supported our family for thirteen years. Now our
bookstore is enabling us to save resources for our future goals
(college tuitions, retirement, etc...).
We pray you will find favor in our request for rezoning.
Thank you for your time and consideration of this request.
Sincerely,
Michael/and Cy~fthia Sciscoe
• •
PROPOSED PROPERTY FOR REZONE
/3J"o z
Q
Q
~q
~i
0
M
N
M
/3Z./3
TA/Y/2S CT
~V
-S'c.oL€ /~~_ moo'
•
PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET
Ted and Wanda Hepper
43 East Fairview Avenue
Meridian, ID 83642
James Court Associates
760 W. Myrtle St.
Boise, ID 83702
Bedelco, Snc.
5204 Sorrento Circle
Boise, ID 83704
Bews & Smith
5204 Sorrento Circle
Boise, ID 83704
Jack E. and Doris F. Barrett
2250 N. Meridian Road
Meridian, ID 83642
James Banducci, Jr.
2116 N. Cole Road
Boise, ID 83704
~ ! ~~
i \~..
i+r~ D+~N
R ~ 4! i~l ~
,~,~. ~
„~~. , ~ ~,
rn~Nw \
;```, ~~
J.B. PFOST 3 ~
~•~
m~wwn I \ .
- I ~
'~. ~
a~lAkl~.aG.q~r1'~V1 i \~.,
rn~rwm n~M
SIIHDIVISION ' \\~~
•
w
-..
~' ,
~ .
c~p~sxa per, I- ~~\
~.. S ~ir~c~geWoo~ I \ C1'~
"h, S (Pro ~09G0(~ ~
tmwaw F~~O y
m~rmr 'f - - qiw
nw~wa
DRI`
tmuwa .
lllNlilM1 \
t
m
Z
m 1
r
~ ~
nw~s ^~~ Z
.~
•\
\~
~ I
I ,~
nw~wn \-` r~lb ~. STREET
~'~'~
nw~~r«
A.urs» s ~ ~'
x ~
~ ~
~ = fIM1MW
t e
~, ~_---
,~ ~~TT71-1 it , - ~ ~-~ ! ~--~~ W
m
A
• •
AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST
STATE OF IDAHO )
ss.
COUNTY OF ADA )
I, Robert R. Angell General Partner of Dorado
(name)
Development Company, 168 N. 9th Street, Suite 250, Boise,
(address) (city)
Idaho being first duly sworn upon oath, depose and say:
(state)
1. That I am the record owner of the property
described on the attached, and I grant my permission
to
Michael Sciscoe 604 E. 45th Street ,
(name) (address)
Boise, Idaho to submit the accompanying
application pertaining to that property.
2. I agree to indemnify, defend and hold the City of
Meridian and its employees harmless from any claim
or liability resulting from any dispute as to the
statements contained herein or as to the ownership
of the property which is the subject of the
application.
Dated this 14th day of October 1993.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before
above written.
the day and year first
My Commission Expires: ~-~/-9.f'
AFFIDAVT.LEG
Residing at ~~,~~, ~~,,.o
.s.,
0
v
I
THESE ARE ITEMS NEEDED FOR ANNEXATION & ZONING REQUESTS
pba GB
~~P'''1
i. Name, address and phone number of applicant;
2. Name, address and phone number of owner of subject property,
and proof of title in said owner;
3. Notarized request for zoning amendment from titled owner,
successor of said owner, or valid title option holder or
contract purchaser with consent from the titled owner if not
requested by the titled owner;
4. Legal description of property;
5. Legal description of all adjoining rights-of-way, railroads,
roadways, highways and easements the full length of the
property;
6. Present land use;
7 . Proposed 1 and use; pv~o~ L~--~e~
8. Present district;
//9~~. Proposed district;
~j~. Characteristics of subject property which make the zoning
~ amendment desirable;
11. Necessity or desirability of development pertaining to the
zoning amendment and its harmony with adjacent development;
12 . One ( 1) map of scal a one ( 1) inch equal s one hundred (100 )
feet of the property concerning the zoning amendment;
13. Thirty (30) copies of a vicinity map of a scale of one (1)
inch equals three hundred (300) feet;
rl~e~o.r~ 14. A list of the mailing addresses of all property owners, from
authentic tax records of Ada County, who are within three
~dP Psa~~ ~ hundred (300) feet of the external boundaries of the land
~ h~,es'~~ being considered, and all property owners included within the
Coal ~ property being considered;
v
I~us e5`~e i~ ~A statement of how the proposed zoning amendment related to
Qi ~ ~ ~"~~ pl~e oP, the Meridian Comprehensive Plan;
~' a (~~c
A ~,d• ~o~`~ 16 . A fee as established by the Counci 1 ; Less than 1 acre =
~~~~ $400.00; Over 1 acre - $400.00 + $15.00 per acre over portion
~~a~~ ,~•~ thereof. In addition to above fee applicant shall pay cost
~~w of certified mailings at rate of $1.29 per notice.
17. The property will be posted i week before hearing stating they
have applied for a Conditional Use Permit or Zoning. There
must be a•signed affidavit that this has been done as part of
the application.
i
.. ~ ~
AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 644
AN AMENDED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING AND CHANGING
THE ZONING OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN WHICH
IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOTS 3 AND 4 OF J. E. PFOST'S
SUBDIVISION IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 6, T.3N.,
R.1W., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of
Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of
said City to amend and change the zoning from R-40 to C-C,
Community Business, for the described parcel in Section 1 below:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council
of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho:
Section 1. That the aforementioned real property which is
described as follows:
A portion of Lots 3 and 4 of J. E. Pfost's Subdivision
in the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 6, T.3N., R.lE.,
B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as
follows:
Commencing at the quarter corner common to Section 1,
T.3N., R.1W., B.M., and the said Section 6, from which
the South 1/16 corner common to said Sections 1 and 6
bears South 0°25'30" East, 1324.06 feet;
thence South 0°25'30" East, 548.50 feet to the REAL
POINT OF BEGINNING.
Thence South 89°43'16" East, 165.02 feet to a point;
thence South 0°53'00" East, 306.12 feet to a point on
the South boundary of said Lot 4 of J. E. Pfost's
Subdivision;
thence along said South boundary and said South boundary
extended South 88°34'59" West, 167.48 feet to a point on
the West boundary of the SW 1/4 of said Section 6;
thence along said West boundary North 0°25'30" West
311.04 feet to the Point of Beginning.
AMENDED REZONE ORDINANCE - SCISCOE
Page 1
i •
be, and the same is rezoned from R-40 Residential to CC Community
Business District, and Section 11-2-425, Official Zoning Maps is
hereby amended to reflect the same. This rezoning is subject to
the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions
of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for
rezone.
Section 2. The Applicant shall pave parking areas
adjacent or near property, the design standards for off-street
parking in 11-2 414 must be met, specifically including the
fencing.
Section 3. That if Applicant shall fail to meet the above
conditions the property shall be subject to rezone back to R-40.
Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency,
which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Amended
Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and approval as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the
City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this G'G'~~ day of
•~JQC(~G~?~~h - -•.. ,..199 ~ .
;,,,. ,_
f u,: ., o- ~~ ,...
iC~ .,i . ~,,, ;1. ~ ~.
a f
4x I'y :.. Q~1
~3. ~} d ~:~.~+:Ci
,'. .. ' ~.
AMENDED REZONE` ORD~N N.CE
APPROVED:
V
MAYOR -- GRANT P KIN F RD
- SCISCOE
Page 2
n
ATTEST:
~ CST-- ~~`= ~~'"--~~' ~
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. -- CITY CLERK
STATE. OF IDAHO,)
ss.
County of Ada, )
•
I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian,
Ada County, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true, full and correct copy of an Amended Ordinance entitled
"AN AMENDED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING AND
CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF
MERIDIAN WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOTS 3 AND 4 OF J. E.
PFOST'S SUBDIVISION IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 6,
T.3N., R.1W., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE"; passed as Amended Ordinance No.644 , by the Cit~ Council
and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the ~ -- day of
~LCC'`n..~~l- , 199 ~, as the same appears in my
office.
DATED this~,L~~day of ~~~~~n~ , 199 `f`
~,
~ ~ Z `~ rj ~ City Clerk, City of eridian
Ada County, Idaho
v. ... r-- ... ... .~. J
r•
~:.°iJ~
.-. ,
:~i ~U Ji.'
FttL ,.,..=.i ...
~_, ~~
f ( '_1 L C
AMENDED REZONE ORDINANCE - SCISCOE
~ ~-r -•c f- ~4
~.,; act,y ~ e
r~
:L ~,~, ,.
Page 3
Gc~ao L~.vSUR.~
~ ~ ~z -«~~
~\,\~ EN G /ry~~~N
RUBBLE ENGINEERING, INC.
9 ~ 9550 Bethel Court ^ Boise, Idaho 83709 208/322-8992 ^ Fax 208/378-0329
y0 SURVEyOQ,
Project No. 9315900 December 14, 1994
REZONE DESCRIPTION
ORDINANCE 644, CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO
A portion of Lots 3 and 4 of J.E. Pfost's Subdivision in the NW1/4 of the SW1/4
of Section 6, T.3N., R.1 E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as
follows: Commencing at the quarter corner common to Section 1, T.3N., R.1W., B.M.,
and the said Section 6, from which the South 1/16 corner common to said Sections 1
and 6 bears South 0°25'30"East, 1324.06 feet; thence South 0°25'30"East, 548.50 feet
to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING.
Thence South 89°43'16" East, 165.02 feet to a point;
thence South 0°53'00" East, 306.12 feet to a point on the South boundary of said
Lot 4 of J.E. Pfost's Subdivision;
thence along said South boundary and said South boundary extended South
88°34'59" West, 167.48 feet to a point on the West boundary of the SW1/4 of said
Section 6;
thence along said West boundary North 0°25'30" West, 311.04 feet to the Point
of Beginning. Containing 1.18 acres, more or less.
Prepared by:
RUBBLE ENGINE,I_`I~VG, INC.
~ J1110 NYI0111~
b661 9 t a3~
Cl~t~-I~~~l~I
' ~44~~1
,~~, IZ1~{-~`f
~~ c~`~~
~~
DTP/vw/des.718 D. Terry Peugh, P.L.S.
•
We, Michael and Cynthia Sciscoe, owners of
Meridian Road, hereby request and consent
property with a zoning designation of C-C.
STATE OF IDAHO
County of Ada
ss.
•
the property at 2210 N.
to the annexation of our
Mic el Sciscoe
Cy is i oe
On th i s ~~ day of /Unue~d ~~ 1994, before me, the undersigned,
a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Michael and
Cynthia Sciscoe, known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed
to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the
same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my
official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written.
,z~..:
,a'~eoooooaa~os
~~ ~ ~~
(SEAL ) ~ >~~~~ ~ ~s , E,,
~, ~>
ti ~
r yp~a~~• ~,C A
Y~ ~
,~1jIIIIB111~,`
Not y Public for
Re ding at:
Commission Expi
:o
Sri il~'ah
•
Meridian City Council
April 19, 1994
Page 21
ENTITLED "ENCROACHMENTS", WHICH SHALL GOVERN IN AREAS OF SPECIAL
FLOOD HAZARDS WHEN FLOOD ELEVATIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED BUT
FLOODWAYS HAVE NOT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone
from the public that would like Ordinance #643 read in its entirety? Entertain a
motion.
Tolsma: Mr. Mayor I move we approve Ordinance #643 with suspension of the rules.
Corrie: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Bob to approve Ordinance #643 with
suspension of the rules, roll call vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Corrie -Yea, Tolsma -Yea
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #7: ORDINANCE #644 - SCICSOE REZONE:
Kingsford: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING AND CHANGING
THE ZONING OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN WHICH IS
DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE SECTION CORNER COMMON TO SECTION
6 AND 7 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RAGE 1 EAST, AND SECTIONS 1 AND 12,
TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the public that would
like Ordinance #644 read in its entirety? Entertain a motion?
Yerrington: Mr. Mayor, 1 make a ,motion that we approve Ordinance #644 with
suspension of the rules.
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to approve Ordinance #644 with
suspension of the rules, roll call vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow -Yea, Yerrington -Yea, Corrie -Yea, Tolsma -Yea
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #8: ORDINANCE #645 - SUMMERFIELD ANNEXATION:
. ~ . . C~00 G~~
ORDINANCE NO.~y !
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING AND CHANGING THE
ZONING OF CERTAIN. REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN WHICH .I~S
DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE SECTION CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS
6 AND 7 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, AND SECTIONS 1 AND 12,
TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of
Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of
said City to amend and change the zoning from R-40, High Density
Residential to C-C, Community Business, for the described parcel
in Section 1 below:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council
of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho:
Section 1. That the aforementioned real property which is
described as follows:
Commencing at the section corner common to Sections 6
and 7 Township 3 North, Range 1 East, and Sections 1 and
12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,
thence North 00°25'30" West, 2141.22 feet to a point on
the section line and on the center line of North
Meridian Road,
thence North 89°34'30" East, 30.00 feet to a 1/2 inch
steel pin with a plastic cap on the Easterly Right-of-
Way of said North Meridian Road,
thence South 00°25'30" East, 42.15 feet along said
Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road, said point
being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING,
thence South 89°43'16" East, 135.02 feet to a 1/2 inch
steel pin with a plastic cap,
thence South 00°53'00" East, 131.03 feet to a 1/2 inch
steel pin with a plastic cap,
REZONE ORDINANCE - DORADO DEVELOPMENT Page 1
" ~~~ • i
thence South 00°53'00" West 174.15 feet more or less,
thence South 88°06'58" West 132.13 feet more or less, to
a 1/2 inch steel pin on said Easterly Right-of-Way of
North Meridian Road,
thence North 00°25'30" West, 177.15 ,feet along said
Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road to a 1/2
inch steel pin with a plastic cap,
thence North 00°25'30" West, 135.00 feet along said
Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road to the REAL
POINT OF BEGINNING.
be, and the same is rezoned from R-40 Residential to CC Community
Business District, and Section 11-2-425, Official Zoning Maps is
hereby amended to reflect the same. This rezoning is subject to
the conditions referenced in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions
of Law as adopted by the Meridian Council on the request for
rezone.
Section 2. The Applicant shall pave parking areas
adjacent or near property, the design standards for off-street
parking in 11-2 414 must be met, specifically including the
fencing.
Section 3. That if Applicant shall fail to meet the above
conditions the property shall be subject to rezone back to R-40.
Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: There being an emergency,
which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall
be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
approval as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council and approved by the Mayor of the
City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this ~ day of Yi`/ ,
1994.
APPROVED:
R -- GRANT P. KI G OR
ATTES
WILLIAM G. BERG, J - CITY CLERK
REZONE ORDINANCE - DORADO DEVELOPMENT
Page 2
1 <
.~ .
C~
STATE OF IDAHO,)
ss.
County of Ada, )
`3, ~ ~~ y ~
~. ~ ^ ~1
I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., of the City of Meridian,
Ada County, Idaho., do hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true, full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING AND CHANGING THE ZONING
OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN WHICH IS
GENERALLY DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE SECTION CORNER COMMON TO
SECTIONS 6 AND 7 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, AND SECTIONS 1
AND 12, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA
COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE"; passed as
Ordinance No . ,(¢t~ , by the City Counci]. and Mayor of the City of
Meridian, on the {~~-day of ,~Df i / , 1994 , as
the same appears in my office.
DATED this ~ day of ~,O~i l , 1994.
~i
STATE OF IDAHO,)
:J' S •
County of Ada, )
City Clerk, City
Ada County, Idah
~,
:kdia~l ,::
... ;;~
,
/ ~
r,.:.>> Qom„ _ ~
.
y+
~.s. ;m ~, ~
~1 t ~ e4
• Et]RS]
A~~
° ,~
r~1" Y
b
,
~y k
Bey`: 2 .... +.:1~;;. r',~t. ;-/
•~ ~
,.
On this ~ y ~ :.w:,.,... , ~:
9 ~' da of ~g1.L, , 1994 5e ore me ~ : =~
the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally
appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known to me to be the person whose
name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
my official seal the day and year in this certificate t above
written . ,.-~~
•, c/
o~
SEAL ~'b E6 SOT A /~~ °° ~ = ~~~~~~t,, ~~
~,~ ~ ExPI
REZONE ORDINANCE - DORADO DEVELOPMENT
ing at Mer d' n~ Idaho
RAT~eN QATP r 2g/4y
Page 3
~.
2
V Y
O z
a
M
w m
H N
~
0 ~ .o j O
U N
ZcNi~
N O O O
< N
<oc
UmW ~m
~p d'
G°
~
dam rn
m 'o ~
N `m
Q
~ ~
~
w
i~
y
W J
O~
~ W
V j
W
OC
~"
Z ..
a y~
C
L
: ;
.
a
v
.
...
~ N ~ ~'. i
•~ ' `
1.1.1 M ~ ~
"' ~ °
o°
C
M
1^..t
~Za
Q 'O 4 /~
~
O
~ ~ (,
W ~N~
.a s
f
O
m~a j
i
r7f Y
S
~
~
a -
3
~
1~- ,,.~
;i.
' "~'
V
N
O
_ ~
~ Q
J
~.. r
OQ
°
a >
_ a
a
1
a
w
Q f
O
Q
H
O
Ul
~~
~,
U ~
H "~
~1 0
O "~
~
~ ti
(
s7 -+
q
W _~
[~--
O o
~ O
L• J
2
W W W
O~ = O ~
r ~
O
z
U
a
z
¢z
O
ZO
~j
O~
UW
No
0
z
0
6
d'
t0
Z
o
~ ~
a n TL7
Q
O
~
~
D
O ~ O
~
U o
C7
Z ~ pCJ
H ~ ~
p b -rl UI
W
U U
o Aa
°~ a
m ~
H
Z
W
a °z
~U
~ V
= ~
H
2
U UZ
Q- ~
~
Q
H
~ O
~ w
E W
F- ~
O~
} O \
1
a t
O N
~
O Fzo
Z
¢a
w
~,
Z
Q
O
Q
W
LL.
O
H
U
d
O
w
H
z
w
z
a
Q
a
s
O
= W
~ a
3
~ o
0
LL Z
U
0
W
U ~
LL Q
N
7
C
z
z
2 W
vi
~ O
~
W LL
O
z
w
W W
a
u~i
N
w
W
~ r
O
_ ~ a
W ~ W
O
O
W °-
iu ¢z
Y ao
a ~ <W
a
wz >
s
• •
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL APRIL 5. 1994
The regular meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order by Mayor
Kingsford at 7:30 P.M.:
Members Present: Ron Tolsma, Watt Morrow, Bob Corrie, Max Yerrington:
Others Present: Will Berg, Wayne Crookston, Shari Stiles, Wayne Forrey, Gary Smith,
Andrew Low, Bev Donahue, Richard Jewell, Tucker Johnson, Gary Asin, Marty
Goldsmith, Mike Shrewsberry, Scott Memon, Bruce Borup, Vickie Welker, Les Schild,
Jim Merkle, Keith Loveless, Dave Roylance, Rich Allison, Ted Hepper, Don Bryan,
Keith Borup, Tom Davis, Craig Groves, Ron Henry, Don Couch:
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD MARCH 15, 1994:
Kingsford: Any corrections, deletions or additions to the minutes?
Tolsma: Mayor, I move we approve the minutes.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Ron, second by Max to approve the March 15 minutes, all
those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: I welcome the Explorer Troop from 30th ward, good to have you guys
with us.
ITE~ #1: REZONE REQUEST: .DORADO DEVELOPMENT AND MIKE & CYNTMI"
SCI COE: TABLED AT MARCH 15, 1994 MEETING:
Kingsford: At that time we met and came up with a formula to meet the time table
correctly for their approvals. At this time I would entertain a motion to approve of the
rezone request for Scicoe and Dorado Development.
Yerrington: So moved
Tolsma: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Ron to approve of the rezone, all those in
favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
~.
Meridian City Council
April 5, 1994
Page 2
•
Kingsford: The next thing you need to do is to have the Attorney draw that
ordinance.
Morrow: So moved
Corrie: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Bob to have the City Attorney draw the
ordinance rezone for Dorado and Sciscoe, all those in favor? Oppos~l?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea`
ITEM #2: FINAL PLAT: VALERI HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION BY VICKIE WELKER AND
NUBBLE ENGINEERING: TABLED AT MARCH 15, 1994 MEETING:
Kingsford: At this we wilt take that up, does Council have any questions?
Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I guess my question would be all the issues that we were
dealing with there have been handled to Wayne's and Gary's satisfaction?
Kingsford: Gary, do you have any question about that at this point?
Smith: I haven't heard from the developer or Engineer on any of it.
Welker: I submitted a plat to Gary's department over a week ago showing the
changes. Whether or not he has seen I don't know but it was given to his
department. I have a copy of it with me to show we complied with everything
requested.
Smith: I have seen it, but it was not a completed plat.
Welker: It was not a completed plat it dealt with the issues that I was asked to deal
with. And we addressed each of the ones that was brought up at the last meeting.
Smith: Mayor and Council Members, the thing that I run into we get so many
submittal all different things and if it is not a completed item I am not going to act on
it. I just don't have time. I did notice there were some lots that had been changed,
lot lines that had been changed. It did appear that those items had been addressed,
but I didn't take time to look at it very closely.
Kingsford: What has been submitted is not a completed .plat?
•
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: April 5, 1994
APPLICANT: Dorado Deveioument and AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 1
Mike and Cynthia Sciscoe
REQUEST: Rezone Request
A EN Y COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT: n ~ 'gyp
(~ ~~l w7
CITY BUILDING DEPT: ~ ~Q V~(,W ~
i,~ J G~
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ~-~~
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ~ ~wE~
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: \~~ a
R ~"I U
ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: ~( -~
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: ~
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:. LETTER FROM MIKE AND CYNTHIA SCISCOE
March 29, 1994
To Whom It May Concern:
It is agreeable with us to change our zoning request from
a C-G to a C-N.
/~ ,~
Michae~~ nd Cynthia Sciscoe
04-05-1994 01~24PM FROM CPML TO 887481332. P.01
•
DCfRADO DEVELGPMENT GbMPANY
~aos~ 3aa-~s ~ i p.o. ~ ~~
Fax (206) 34532 i Boise, Idaho &3701
Aprijl 5, 1994
Ms. !Shari Stiles
City of Meridian
33 E:. Idaho St.
Meridian, ID 83642
Post-it° Fax Note 767.1 r~'' fL pages-
To F
i
Pho
Fax # ~ ~ p '~ Rhpna ~,~ - ,~'
F8X M
F8x:.887'4813
RE: rezone Request
Dear Shari,
LarrX D. Stevens a.nt~ I, as individuals, are the cµrrent owners of
the ;. 55 acre pieta of properrty located on the northeast corner of
Nprt~i Meridian Road ;and Jam®s Court, aka "Parcel III". We
recezitly purchased this land from the entity of Dorado
rieve~lopment Company,; of which Mr. Stevens and I are sole owners.
At axe point in timei, Dorado Development Company owned the .42
acre with residence;, now owned by Mr. Michael Sciscoe, aka
"Par;'pel II", the .55€ acres, now owned by us, and the 6.45 acre
parc!ei located to tixe east of the Sciscoe's property, aka "Parcel
I", :which is still ob~med by Dorado Development Company.
It i~3 our intention to request from th® City of Meridian a rezone
on tl°~e .55 acres from R-40 to CC, allowing us to construct an
office building on the property. As such, we formally ask that
this letter serve as our official raqu®st to the Cfty for this
coning changra .
I amp enclosing a legal description of Parcel ITI, the .55 acres
in c~estian.
Plea'sE contact me at your earliest convenienoe should you have
any further questions.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely yours,
R t An ell
Pres~.de
RRA/tnh
SHAR;i . REZ
Enclosure
TOTAL P.01
04-05-=994 01~43PM
FROM CPML
•
amium Amount: $ 45.p0
S C H L D U L~- A
TO
U
Order No.: ST-92037425 PW Policy No.: 0-9993-67346
Date of Policy: JUNE 2~5, 1993 at 4:53 p.m.
Amount ~o£ Insurance: $' 10,000.OQ
1. Nand o£ Iasured:
Rd.BERT R. ANGELL AND LARRY D. STEVENS
2. The 'estate or iaterest in the ].and described hereia aad
which 3s covered by this Policy is:
FEE SIMPI,S
3. Theiestate cr iaterest referred to hereia is at the date of
policy vested i~x;
R{7BERT R. ANGELL, a married znan, and LARRY D. STEVENS, a married
main ~ .
4. Thellaad referred to: in this Policy is situate ia:5tate of
IDA~D, Cou~xty of ADAc
PPRCEL III '
COMMENCING at the section corner common to Sections 6 and 7,
Township 3 North, Range ~. 8ast, and Sections 1 and 12, Township
3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian thence
North 00 degxees 25'30" West, 2141,22 feet to a;point on the
section line and on the center line of 1Vorth Meridian
Road, thence
North 89 degxees 34'3x" East, 30.Q0 feet to a 1~2 inch steel
pin with a. plastic cap on the Easterly Right-of-Way
of said North Meridian Road, thence
North 88 degrees 43'49" East, 328.22 feet to a 1/2 inch
steel pin with a plastic cap, thence
North 83 degrees 49`27" East, 129.18 feet to a L/2 inch
. steel pin .with a plast~.c ca.p, thence
North $$ degrees 48'37" Bast, 389.26 feet to a.~./z inch
steel pin with a plastic cap, thence
South 31 degrees 03'37" Sast, 414.88 feet to a 1/2 inch
steel pin w~,th a plastic cap, thence
South 88 degrees 34'59" West, 1057.50 feet to a'. 1/2 inch
j _..._ . .. ... ._ -_._. __... . __-..~...~
Post-it 'Fax Note 7871 oa ~L~ pates ~ ~.
04-05-1994 01~44PM FROM CPML
,;,tip
r
TO
887481332 P.02
•
S9~l. ya'
1
I~S7r ~~/
i
P01
•
March 4, 1994
To Whom it May Concern:
We are in agreement with changing our rezone request from
C-G to C-C.
,.,,.rte .~ t..U ,
MYOh 1 and Cynthia Sciseoe
t:
e~
04-~-1994 01~24PM
FROM CPML
TD 887481332 P.01
•
DEVELOPMENT GOMPp-NY
{2(78 344~'a511
Fax {208 345.632 i
AQrij~. 5, 1~g4
Ms. Shari Stiles
Cityipf Meridian
33 E:. Idaho St.
Meri~dir~n, ID $3642
P.O. f3cuc 2666
Bais~s, Idaho 83701
Post it' Fax Nate 787.1 pap®~''
Tp i
Fax # SS• f7~ t1' ~'/ ~, F&X M ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ,~
F~cx:. 887-4$i3
REs rezone Request .
Dear Shari, ~ .
L~arrX D. Stevens anc~ I, as individuals, are the current owners of
the ;. 55 acre piece of prop+aarty located on the northeast corner of
North Merid~.~i Road ;and James Court, aka "Parcel ZIY". We
recehtly purchased this land from the entity of Dorado
Development Company,; of which Mr. Stevens and Z are sale owners.
At oir~e point in tiRtei, Dorado Development Company owned th® .42
acr®';s with residsnc+a, now owned by t+4r. Michael Sciscoe, aka
"Parcel II", the .55~ acres, now awned by us, snd the 6.45 acre
parcel located to thse eSBt of the $CiaC~oe's Qroperty, aka "Parcel
I", wh~.eh is still ob~med by Dorado Development Company.
It io our intention~to r~+quest from the City of Meridian a rezone
on the .55 acres from R-40 to CC, allowing us to construct an
office bu~.lding on the property. As such, we fornEa7.ly a:sk that
this letter serv® as our official r®quest to the City for this
zoning change. .
any Further questyo~s.
~harik you for your assistance.
I amp enclosing a legal description of Parcel TII, the .S5 acres
in c,~testiort.
Plea'sE contact me at your earliest convenience show-d you have
Sincerely yQUrs,
R t An ell
Preside
RRA/inh
SiiAR~ . REZ
Enc~.+~sure
TOTAL P.01
04-05-1994 01~43PM
TO
• '
887481332 P.01
FROM CPML
aittiwm Amount : $ 45 . QQ
SCIi$DULE - A
Order No.: ST-92p3'i425 PW Policy Iva, : 0-9993-X57306
Date of Ptilicy: JUNE 2~5, 1993 at 4;53 p.m.
Amount~o£ Insurance: $~ 10,OO0.Oq
1. Namel of Iasured:
Rd.BERT R. ANGELL A~TD LARRY D. STEVSNS
2. The Testate or iaterest in, the ].and desczibed herein and
which is covered 17ythis Policy is
~~'E snKPZ~s .
3. The iesta.t:e or interp~tt: referred to herein is at tXie date of
goli'cy vested in:
RdBERT R. 1~,T~GBLI~, a married z~tan, and LARRY D. STEVBNS, a married
man ~ .
4 . The ;laraid referred to iix this Policy is sitaate ia: State of
IDA@O, County of ADA:
PARCEL III '
CoN1MENCING at the section corner common to Sections ~ and 7,
Township 3 North, Range ~- Ea9t, and Sections 1 and 12, Township
3 ~torth, Range 1 West , Boise Merid~.an thence
North. 00 degrees 25'30" West, 2141,22 feet to apoint on the
section line and on the Centex line of forth Meridian
Road, thence
North 89 degrees 34'30" East, 30.Qb feet to a 1~2 inch steel
pin with a plastic cap on the Easterly Right-of-Way
of said North Meridian Road, thence
North 88 degrees 43'49" East, 32$,22 feet to a 1/2 inch
steel pin~with a plastic cap, thence
Nr~rth 83 degrees 49`27" East, 129,1$ feet tv a 1/2 inch
. steel pin.witri a plastic cap, thence
North $$ degrees 48'37" Bast, 389.26 feet to a ~.j2 inch
steel pin with a plastic cap, thence '
South 3~. degrees 03'37^ East, 414.88 feet to a 3/2 inch
steel pi:z w~,th a plastic cap, thence
South 88 degrees 34'59" West, lOS7.50 feel to a.1/2 inch
Past-it 'Fax Nate 7$7i
., _.._.
04-05-1994 01~44PM FROM C~ML
. , ,- "M! ,
1
TO
•
887481332 P.02
598." ia'
/V,? /• ~~
i
TOTAL P.02
~~ ~ ~ •
Marsh 4, 1994
'!'o {~Thotp it May Concern:
We are in agreement with changing our rezone request from
G-G tP C:-C
^ ~ '1
• , ~
P01
Mich 1 and Cynthia ~ciscoe
` ~ . •
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MARCH 15. 1994
The regular meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order by Mayor
Kingsford at 7:30 P.M.:
Members Present: Max Yerrington, Walt Morrow, Ron Tolsma:
Members Absent: Bob Corrie:
Others Present: Will Berg, Wayne Crookston, Wayne Forrey, Shari Stiles, Gary Smith,
Jim Johnson, Chief Gordon, Christian Bourguignon, Frank Stoppello, Vickie Welker,
Roger and Gini Allen, Kathleen Weber, Marty Goldsmith, Les Schild, Niclole Ritter,
Brian Smith, Rick Ritter, Anna Bodine, Becky McEvoy, Terry Echenroh, Bev Donahue,
Tucker Johnson, Lydia Aguire, Michael Sciscoe, Cheryl Ward, Keith Loveless, Gary
Flores, Dave Roylance, John Shipley, Steve Barker, Michael Clarke, Jim Lang:
MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING HELD MARCH 1, 1994:
Kingsford: Are there any corrections, additions, or deletions to those minutes?
Tolsma: I move they be approved.
Morrow: Second
Kingsford: Moved and seconded to approve of the March 1, 1994 minutes, all those
in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Kingsford: I would like to welcome Pack 5, Den 3 of the Linder Elementary Scouts
here as well as Troop 17 of the Boy Scouts from Meridian. First on the agenda I
would like to do a proclamation. Whereas, Kris Adamson is a native Citizen of the
State of Idaho, Ada County and the City of Meridian, and Whereas Kris Adamson did
so represent the State of Idaho at the 1994 United States Weightlifting Federation
National Championships, held March 11th through the 13th and Whereas Kris
Adamson did so win the 70 kilogram division and in doing so became the first Idaho
woman to ever win a National Weightlifting Championship and Whereas in so doing
she as brought honor and recognition to her State and herself, We the City of
Meridian acknowledge her outstanding accomplishment, and commend her
achievement by awarding her this proclamation and affix the seal of the City of
Meridian so that all who read this shall know of this fine accomplishment by our
native daughter. Kris would you like to come forward and accept this proclamation
please.
ITEM #1: TABLED: REZONE REQUEST: DORADO DEVELOPMENT AND MICHAEL
• •
Meridian City Council
March 15, 1994
Page 2
AND CYNTHIA SCISCOE: TABLED AT MARCH 1, 1994 MEETING:
Kingsford: Are they present, would you come forward and advise us where we are
at with that.
Sciscoe: As of our tabling last week, we submitted some drawings to what we were
planning to do to the property and talked with Wayne Forrey and got with Wayne
Crookston on it. They believe that it can be worked out with the facts and findings
that were brought up originally. We were ourselves wondering if it would be possible
to reconsider a CN on the whole property. Mainly because the question of having a
residence on the commercial property in the original facts and findings was addressed
on CG property as opposed to CN and we have been asking for that to be shown to
us in the law where it is stated that you cannot have a residence in a commercially
zoned area specifically a CN and that hasn't happened yet. We are also concerned
that by dividing the property into R-8 for the home and CN for the business only that
it will create and uneconomic remanent in the future. Again one of our reasons for
purchasing this property and going for the CN zoning was that the property next door
is CG and there are people living on that in a residence. I know in the facts and
findings it said that it is a single family residence, but the last time we checked on our
zoning map it was zoned CG.
Kingsford: Can I interrupt you just a minute. The folks in the back there are a
number of seats here, you are welcome to sit down. As uncomfortable as it is up
here I can imagine what it would be like standing out there. Go ahead Mr. Sciscoe.
Sciscoe: So, I guess one of my questions is where that is stated in the law as far as
having a residence. I am assuming that if it is in the law and this is purely and
assumption on my part at this point that it is talking about new development of a new
home as opposed to one that has been there for 40 years. I am still trying to find out
where that is either in the Ordinance or in the law.
Kingsford: Wayne, would you care to address that?
Crookston: The restrictions are in the allowed uses that are designated in the
schedule of zoning controls. Residences are not listed as a use either in the CN, CC
or in fact the CG.
Sciscoe: Now, is that referring to new development or established residences already.
Crookston: That refers to everything, that is not to say that someone is there living
in the residence at the time it was rezoned. That doesn't mean that they have to quit
~~ • •
Meridian City Council
March 15, 1994
Page 3
living there.
Sciscoe: Well, I guess that is what I'm wondering too. I mean we are living there
now in the case of the rezone I guess I would state that all through Meridian and all
over the valley area there are people having residence with commercial businesses.
1 guess I still have the question of why the neighbors to the north were able to
purchase this property as a residence and we are not in that same position.
Crookston: I can't address what happened with the situation regarding the property
to the north of you. I have not looked into that. One difference is that to my
understanding you were not living in that property at the time you filed your
application.
Sciscoe: We had, we filed our application on November 9th and I'm trying to
remember did we close in November or December, it was closed on December 10th.
But, I am not sure, I am concerned in the future that if our business expands to the
point where we are not able to live on the property, when we go to sell that property
we are going to have 2 different properties. We are going to have a residence and
a commercial slot there. As development increases around the area, with the
apartments behind it and the businesses next door that are going to be limited office
the feasibility of selling that parcel or parcels in that situation because 1 believe we
requested here that if it was in the situation of the R-8 for the home and zoned CN
for the business that.
Kingsford: As I perceive this Mr. Sciscoe, the Council is not up to speed on that
unless you have submitted something for them to consider in the way of a variance
or whatever. If you tried for remedy with staff and that hasn't been satisfactory you
then need to present to the Council for some sort of a consideration of overriding of
that staff level decision. We are certainly not aware of the situation. We have no
idea what you are talking about. While your train of thought is gone mine was never
there.
Sciscoe: Well, I guess that is what we would request at this time because it has been
since November that we have been going through this process and its been
educationally good and frustrating at times too. Originally when we started with the
CG it was 2 months later that we were told that we can't have a residence on that
CG. And I'm wondering why they would take 2 months to find that out. There are
a lot of questions that I can't understand why the process has digressed from the
original of no problem at all to do this to everything in the world seems to be a
problem now. I definitely need to get it worked out because our business is now
located in the place where we used to live and we would like to get it moved over to
~~ ~ •
Meridian City Council
March 15, 1994
Page 4
our property and get started with the structure etc. If there is anyway we can
expedite the process it would be appreciated.
Kingsford: I would suggest possibly a meeting be set up as quickly as possible
involving Shari Stiles, and myself, one or 2 members of the Council and let's look at
exactly where you are at and where we need to go.
Sciscoe: I would appreciate that.
Kingsford: Entertain a motion to table this until the next meeting pending the
outcome of the attempted resolution.
Morrow: So moved
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Watt, second by Max to approve tabling this until the next
Council meeting, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All yea
ITEM #2: TABLED: REZONE REQUEST: ROBERT AND FRAN WHITMtRE: (TABLED
AT MARCH 1, 1994):
Kingsford: Are they here, would you state your name for the record please?
Ward: My name is Cheryl Ward. We are requesting this rezone on 408 West Cherry
Lane. It is located approximately 2 blocks west of Meridian road on Cherry Lane. It
is an area of mixed residential and commercial use. There are a number of
commercial businesses in the area. The particular property that we are requesting a
rezone on it Whitmire Construction. It is a very low traffic business because they do
schedule appointments. It is a circular drive that is located in front of the property,
we feel that it would be a very small impact on the traffic on Cherry Lane. It would
be easy on/ off road access. Whitmire's have agreed to comply with everything the
City and the Highway District have requested as far as signage, landscaping, parking.
We just don't see any problem with it at all.
Kingsford: Was the issue of screening addressed? Are we tacking about a
construction yard or what are you talking about.
• ~ • •
• ` RECEIVED
MAR 1 4 1994
CITY C~ ~~~~~'~~~
FY•L~n): f~Si cfir:,~l Wit: i •sr.^,•~e•
Frtu~s ~rL-,}'-~rt.Y f;~zc,»~ l;r>r.~u~~t c3r•.ite~•sj 3`lL-+v~n)~s>r•r•? r3f i95?..
3"c+s 1~3r•. 4d,3_y»r FL•1rr^8rt ~f4?,. ~3-)ar^i Si-. i 3 Cis i~Strlrii?Sr"~' L•iT t:t)F?`
~1~Lar ~i r~ zi»s3 3~f~~} tis»s
yl~: ,•ar^is~i»ri3 3Y' ~u~s;sit:tt,ri a r•5.•: r~»~• r^t.+~5.5s~:,t i»r~ c,ttr gsrL-,}~e_r•tY 33~•
C-t L•L•, r»ai-+3~ t,ur^ YEin)i3y tc+ run t1 l-sL-+s»t= ~+u~i»~~•s. ~'>urr tL-+
>titsat: w>=• br-li~v~ t,:~ t5~ n~i~3ur>ri~r~t:a»c~»~s, r=»r_L•~u»tt,r>,r3s it i')~i:s
t~~» »~~~:=a•`+r:~ry~ tt+ s»~•,et wi ti•s 3+R~r i ri i t+r, f33 ~n»i rya t+»,r~ i~c+»i nr2 a~r>r3
?:5 i.5 t}nsi t? t;hi_•n 3~•tt ~r t: L-+ yat.t.
33•~~ fr,3 3L-+wi»t~•7 ot5t3 i»5uss t••!•s+._ rar~rt=mss»ta»t r^~~it:3~~r~ ~~twt~» s»YS~=`1 •fs
3~1>-. FL~rr~~r l~ta. ~t i 3~s~ ~-i»si ir3r. '~t~s» ~fF_i»trr_~it <eitt,~r^»rsY fL••,r
Dc.rridr~ 3]F~vc~rl,~+i~eer•s> ,:~» 3Yfarrrai-s =r. .1`)q`4•s
3•l~r s»e+ i» r5:~a:~L-,»:=+ s=ar^ »L-~t dwr`^si >•i na t,, d iv i dtr t ix Fr^ot~rr^ty,
i» r75.5~•t i,•+» i»t,:, t:wL-, 3£~'i`f]Liirest f° 3ti+t_-c• c•.i9 ~sr~ra,:>se~d i» t:i~t-
Fart: s ..+»r:i F i »;:i it~,Q~ a•:_a ^~~ubs>)i t• t,:~rd ~~y !3r^. Cr^+_+ot•<st L••~» es r^~ an,
fe~3 3L~w~ s
.~+t_•r:e+usi, L•~f• t3» lziys-:+ut: w-.f t!•)t~ wf~L•)3e ~r^o~ertp i» qt.}~•StaL~n=
i r>c 3 t5 rj i r, sy t; hL~+ r•_• ~ i :~,t i m~ !} `-,a)rA .ri Yrti 3 c'i»rti f
a. »raw !+rti'~arfcs w.-,u313 n)rik,~ iic an)ta,~t-~~ii~l~:• t~r.+ g•r~•r_t:
t~rL-~~.+c:+~rr3 +.~Lros)»5e•r-rir]3 i+,.si3rii r')i}'•~5 rjt5e; ~L.1 3at~34 L-+f'
f,•:.c+t~E+~ir 3.s=••s`•t~ Ei`sr.+a 3eii~3~ e-~•f•'tft>' Y'~:e,-,Y)~ o'f 'tl~i'~• •~i:.~~•
os- 3 L"tit .'~
#). riivitii»s3• ~rL~~srrt_yf :i»•tn tw,_+ 3,-+t As ~33L•~ wL~u3ri s»ak>y
t:3» wnszi33+r=r et-+nsr»ra>^citi3 3L~t: ra» ury~L~I~L-+»)St:i~3 rr_~s»»ar)t.
intrz fs~l i r~v~ t3-sat. its is ~L-,:a3i i•~3 s: •that F.i 3az:3< L->f u»tit:r^t5t a»r3i »S_,s
a:~.~ t: ,-+ ~:•s~~r`•t•3y !sL•m5 tt)~ pr^,',~~L~r^t•y~ is 3aaic3 c,ut <i. ~, t3•>e• r:.t~ir~t
si~FS. L~f ~r;~,r,~r•ty~ •s~,a r• 1pr•,aa.-,L~•-:,erti s._r/>ys»n)~r`~aa.3 a=•,=) u)a_r ~avf~
i=at.5af_'1~ a`l.f)YSL'9i A)]•gt.5»l:j~r^4tL'IY74j]~»f.7r T~3~^L•~t t~7E~ =`Ll}^r•LL't C:+;3:'•_*~ta»f:~
?L~»i»~ L,) -t.:!)r aLSY•Y^t•~t.irit:~lr~i~ r.-,Y•,~~tar•titas•~ ~a•~ tam-er-, n~is~-•~-~tatt:zf i»
t 3•sr s= ~a i.": •t s.. ci »,ra ~' i r•)ti i » ~_ s 25 =• a i., m a t 1- Sri 'fi: ,~ a =s . S~ 3 t:?A ~4~ 4• ~>a••
~.`•tiS'}]~.lt ~i iiY>ij t%.~ c~it~;c~i.~'?t.t~.
rrY^,:,3>) rr; ~S>, t77. t !.%~ `r'i~,.5 w:a ? 3 »L-*ir i Lt:r •~::zsa •~r_•:tt.t.i3 <_:•si :~1= i±f •~h~ Brrt<a
•£: ti+ btu u ~•,ft: 3 ~~t_+r-_n:; FL,r c; 1sss»L r^c ~ a 3 t.t•~t_•• i L~r, 31f e:t? r :~ 1 '~5 r .
+~.i`ai:•T i?1£:3:ir:. `)~.s:x:' ~~':f;)ira _}•,~5-,Q•...f_r: *:,~ ~}~f~ ]U):)fr•?f~7i3'~G »5'~Y'•~t) ]`
f~`S.5}`r'~+Y'?~'~N ,}/ S°_L~}.1,Pt.:' i.:.._~; 8?'?L' S';~: c3 i'.=i•i+ t•^'Sr, t:.' t.5~ .S 3 :S. :fiP f~ il_-• d
.. _. _ .., ~i c::'h,:. f.. ~ i.. ~~~^i-~'::`f?Y^~i `)• ~~`•,1 '~ ~•5~! S ~7!))i:°rj :1 Ei't: £" °`L-)5.5t3`} .t '.r+
s•r.~`~ t.tQ^-•':: i »~z s~i'•!^r~Y• S'.--^d ,ter i_~-~ ZL•ti»ir,r,t v.+hi c?~e•`,iti?r^ 5.-.,~-,r•`~t^~ ~-+ut
hc~:~,-.,.. .~.- . :t ~: ~ ..
•
•
;rd#:z t.~sn`.'t :i r. •~••~ t'-sa •~,~."~ :i L~swi »:-; .l•~r.ar+\~^aa 1 .r a f i t ~2 r~,a,t= t~t>Es €h-+ar^c{,
t~,+~-,tis?c~ f::»cit+Iw ~.SS tt:.) f_+~ttr•r t+rz r~~.+3e• •t L+ cir_*•/~=3~,fi t~-r~ ~+r••t,~•,rr•t•sf
•S`i:~r• t;~e s.s•:as;.~r_ ~~ t:>ui-•~ in~•r_! :i» Y.+LSY^ \:+y`xa~. ina3 rrt~r.\:+n~• ~sts~+n:ati`•a3
amt a3 •~" c\a»~=L-,r^n~ •!•~, i-l~c: ij~:~s•ir^~:~, L~f t•i-sr'+ L•i •ty At•tor^»~y s
a,. ti-• Y^Qac,->»>: i'St! w;-)t~3~ ~r^,~s:>er^t:N C-3^l rat!->er- t•l~i~» C-f,,
h.a•/s-~ >••c~s~us~•~t: Lid rr•vi ~t~•rx_`~ ..+f' •ttr£ or••di »a»r_~ >vl~i r_!~
t'37~°_•'•r"i3 ~,:1 i•:i!: r'g'_3]i.'~£?»•t ]H.? iS :'3 Y: L1 i' ~-••[~` Qr^L~~'?1sY"t yl, T}r i.3
n=t~:~ts~s)~~nt ~+~. s))at3~ sr°: t:3~E: F R• F h~i*_•+ r•.at!•r~r r_,c.»~'v±,ec3 +<.~~t
ti'kS t' t.:> is 3~s> sfi ai: is ~.•?f' tl~~:~ i'~>^c»snr•••~l•' t~L-, ti~rs: inrs»~rla atss
»t•+r••t3s~ ~\r~i»r~ C•--C~ ~~snd ,-+cctshitvc! ~a~ r~s•id~r)tia3 ~~ot:3~, I~de•
a. 3 s~-~ ~sr)ds:: r..:t rlriti t:-> i ~:s ~~r•`+_+s~;sr^t~}~ fi,~ S:sf~ rr~rr~»t~ 2 _sf
~+~sr^c'.~z+~^~c~. "l~t~i~ s-•3ct_•\ ra»,:3 ~= Sr)C~i »17`-'~ tvric~ r•>sf=~rs t~.+
~`•3-)g ~~rL~s-+Qr`t~ _y :~t+ •~lsr~ »L-+rt h ir> ~r^r`L->r i i , er. "_~i »r33~
3'6 nS .13)/ Y'E'}: ]£j P>')Cfa" L')Y~ ~+r$i~t_°• C::i ~t'_ E~»{~ £r S~c~r3Y7 ').q1 »f3~~°
'S<Eh n7? ~. _~/ Y't_'!`•3 :f. L3 fr»t i P3 " \'+Y> rt'~et ~i=` ~~ ~4r1) .
~r7 c+»y/ t•°YY?»'t:t SKE'• Ar^E* YIi ~ ~ ]Y)t? tL'+ a„.ypitCS~ L1 i1 r` :t +_•»i Yrf_?
r`xrz7s.stY•4t ',:,:> C":-?4,s ii' ~~-•~~ L,»a»3 3•r, t3•Y~ ~t-+»=`c~r^» sNi•C~
i:3-) .i ~.. 3 r' •th i a : « •s:t. i 3 ? ~~ ~•+rt+i~.? ~m,s s»~w~ sw~ ~ 3 r:-e+:~r
r•srrr;~i ven i»r' i t• t s=•» tit}r.. tss)S~r)t Eat :it?» of is t) Jai f_+rr.3 i »E4Y)[`t~ anrj
_,~sti~•~:zc}u~»~t3y/ r^ses:~uc:st z±s-`ca»cif~~t3•)rr` >^is±.h•b:~ t,~ re_~i~+e a~r•)
3~!-s;a rr•>-+t~Er`i:_P uY>t.:i3 ~••~3~ L~f' _:saiti ~+r~~+t~`r•t_y!
{:.+. w~`snr_t ~•~" t+f t:l~~ ~r•L-+~r_-r•t.y frL~nt fir+~ st+~-~s~» re•~s r.3r»t i a3
a»s~ )'~r:~s asy~e-Ali»s~ r>7a~LSY•s:•~ ZH»r~?.if_'!E~~i»!~• i» ~xi~ntra»c~
aI r^e•atij y~ v~+a r^~c{vi: •~t iir a r)g r 3 3 •.•yrs~d t" 3 ~a-vs.> a»c3 izs~~r•+~vr~
s.sl:r,~» s••r3-rai:~ Yxi_~t~ ti~,s:i£~h an j.3~ t~tc-ttrnc•3t? resti•r~Y^ •Chan
L' e«t r^L-+y/ t hc~ ~+£•ci ut: i f v3 f r^t~r•>•t:ca ~r~ a 3 rr~~+d;y :•st.t~»c3i »i}
ir•> L~r,~fs_•r` fi~-~ .~~+si: ir) ai :?~~ 3air>tlsx.:83:ri»r~ _~i~t:t.+sc3t. '~3~~
F,>.~r•• t i ,~,s~ L~.r. t !•)~ 3 r,t sMC= r., 3 rti» t,_'+ ci t vt 3 L•~~+ r \_+srss»er^c s a :i 3 y
r,->»t~ai»m~ s»2ir>3y y-ssr3cinss arsd ctr•iv~wayf zap 3L•ats»e»t..
l.Rti~a ti,+L•ts 3rd t+~ •,/~r~/ y,s.i 3 3 i »r~ t\~ ~Y)`ilsrs~ a»}~ upstr^~+cii »~ +at'
t~sQ \r^a~r~I t:nA_~Y`mt?YS3~ »ert:ti~r.:.t,
1.•_^i CI ~ ) r.l)' C•1 `_i •t• ~•SL ~SY•)1. ] Y)f~+ L L••+»i~ff}^1W. •\ L,Y`C+LS~+) )t LS~1 } r7 t J'SL•a ~= AC: ~!_\
~:sr~t~ F:i »rii »S~i3s •frrsn>: i»s~ }~~ a»~s a3, rf'•adY e~xi ,1t i» ~it»`ad~'~r
k+s.si .? c3.i »L-~ ~3erm_, f~+r t})Q 3\:+uth anc3 ts£+~t: ~.+L•+u»r.•ia>`i ~+ of
,:>s.sr ~r~~s•,a>•fiY. !*d~r us\-+ts3.rf ~i=> 1-rat~i+Y •~L+ trrr-rr.•t fs!=rrr_i»s3 ,ors
t~t~r »L~r^t3~ s,»t3 rac•st.
~i)BY~~< `y'i71.5 i'~Zcf .iri :4',_+r` _r'C?UY^ f_'.t1 ri:•1 i~Y!Y`s?i '{'i,?Y) s'tiY L', 1.SY` S.rr`L•1fiL1S Ef~Sw
/~~~~'~~ =CMG--
=.. r'"..s,, iY is ~ t \.+ •i: h n sn ~, »`r' rj -r..? ~i 4.~., w~• 3•s a v ~ f'?i ~+E?Y• :i reY)~ f.~ w i {• f'S t 3~ i "'
rc>r ~c:, rY~• Yr>°>~ts ~__: •~ t s~ee:r Y,4i~15 .? {j c~7:~Ar••c~c .S a'te t+ryY t-~L'+_~:•~` i t~ 3 F n3~r•_•s»<{ r, f
£'.?ti S)'1:I S t~ 1 Y)1~ .~;_) a i".~ »r'.t I _: '3: a 1~£``:3 Ll ~- •~ h :S :~• r`Y_`x.~ LS f?!=`3:. {s13r')~C yi', LS.
- sc ~ sC'oE ~o E,Q T t~ ~C~ZIf.ZT
' A T ~J,~FS~,vT
!~~ ~ /
-~~~\ . /,3/. 0 3, ..
~,-- _,
'~ ~ i'~ L AQf E
:~ ~ i ~
%%
,r_ yo
/3 S.o.
~L/LAG G (-D
i3vSN~ S
3 ~ "6 ,2ESidEVice
~/
(o f~/
V
/C(jCQGIZrs~uS
i ~` , 1 i~
SIQC G.~i4G,tC
~~",<?.~ ETA ~v ~O A D
6-b
iZ ~8-~
PA rto ~ v-y
CA,~aGC
(bNC-2~c
SLAB
~~
/~- 6
y3-e -y
P~~ ~
RG
C
j~ + ~
i
~
~
o
~ 5~
'~
~
~
~~ ~
~ ~l; ~aQ~r
fVE~ G,QEE.~i
`
I T~2~E
~ ~j ~
i~
tG % i~
~
/
~
0~ ~~SC
BNS~'S ~oG/E~2
PoGc
~ !~ ~ 3 . 3 0
/ 3G.oG
~Y
,Sid C~ ,' /irk ~a/
~: I~D.QA D O ~~ o ~ ~Zo.v E~ /Z- yb~
~Z-
._-
{ PAS
1
~ o-I o
y
iB-3
S~o~ /~`6
.S~o,D
bl-d
131-'b
3S /o -6
l'0 77 AG c
~jAQFflovSC
~~-~~
f',~of'os~1~ C -~
sc l~ ~o ~ _ .~ B
GJ.rTH wA~~ ~-/oUS%S~o~ ~G'DOS~10~
wCLJ --
GAQaGr
Fa~~eso.~,.~)
3s
~o
G,P.vv~z- r'~r rht ~.T ~=o
S /DE wAL,~ ~d~
/~7E~ .~-q sQ.v ,~ o A .D
~8'
,~ I
_ ~ I ~,pQK/.tJlr
,~ ~~A
cE~ y~ 3 ~ f ~~~ZU~~
'~`__._
~_`. aweQpe~e.
30~
I~
Q
~ i
~~
~ ~1
~ o
W
~ ~
°~ U
O
(~
q..
^Q
V
0
I q
. + ,, •
Meridian City Council
March 1, 1994
Page 14
•
Kingsford: That is voided too for the same reason as item #7.
I ~--~ ITEM #10: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR REZONE FOR DORADO
DEVELOPMENT AND MICHAEL AND CYNTHIA SCISCOE:
Kingsford: At this time I'll open the public hearing on that issue and invite the
applicant or his designated representative to speak first.
Michael Sciscoe, 2210 North Meridian Road, was sworn by the Attorney.
Sciscoe: Yes, we were going through the procedure here, but we were on
vacation we had Wayne Crookston put together the Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law because we are having some questions on what was
happening in your procedure. We're new at this, we are not professionals at
developing property, but at our initial rezone request we were looking at the
property to put it, there was a house residing there already and then to put our
business there also. In our search we looked at the property we were residing at
now and it happened to be the property next to us to the north being zoned
commercial general, we look at the possibility and potential to do it there. Well,
before purchasing the property we came to Wayne Forrey and made sure it would
at least be possible or relatively possible, not an impossibility. It seemed to be
fitting in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan at that time and it still does and we
went ahead and purchased the property because it looked fairly positive and
willing to take that risk. Well after the first hearing in November we found that the
board didn't have any objections of going to Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law at that time. Between that and the December meeting Wayne called us and
informed us that there was problem with us rezoning it to CG simply because of
the density and the potential for the kinds of businesses that could go on there
after we left if we chose to sell the property at a later date. Wayne and I
discussed the potential for making if commercial neighborhood or CN. That being
able to work for what we planned to do with the layout of our property. We were
told at that meeting it was postponed to January to see if the property would work
out as CN. At the January meeting Wayne discussed this with the board and it
was brought forth by Mr. Crookston that he was concerned about residence being
on commercial property. If I understood you right Wayne its not legal for residents
to live on commercial property.
Crookston: That is correct.
Sciscoe: That, for a new residence or for an existing residence on the property?
Is there a distinction there between he 2 in the law?
' 4 . • •
Meridian City Council
March 1, 1994
Page 15
Crookston: You can convert a residence to a use to another use, but the problem
was you were going to have a business use in a property that you are not going to
be living on. You were still dividing it, you wanted to rezone the entire parcel
initially to CG and then to CN but you were going to live in a portion of it that had
always been a house and you were still going to use it as a house. So it made
sense to leave that as a residential zone.
Sciscoe: So, is there a problem with us having that whole property zoned CN and
living in that house?
Crookston: Our ordinances do not allow living in a commercial zone.
Sciscoe: Then may I ask why the people to the north of us are living in a
residences in a CG zone?
Crookston: I can't answer I don't know the circumstances there Mike.
Sciscoe: Well that has been confusing to me because they just bought the
property a couple of months or so before we did and then they are being allowed
to live in a commercially zoned area and that is what gave us the assumption that
we would be able to do the same thing also.
Crookston: I think, are you talking about as what I know as the Ambrose home?
Sciscoe: It may have been.
Crookston: I believe that was under a Conditional Use.
Sciscoe: Wayne, do you know anything as far as the zoning on that?
Forrey: Is this the engineering office. I don't know the history other than that
was Steve Hosac's office at one time. I don't know Mike.
Sciscoe: I believe the Bocho plat showed a CG and that is why I was questioning
that.
Crookston: I have not looked at it Mike so I can't.
Sciscoe: Well, we had some other concerns with the facts and findings outside of
that. I think some of the discrepancies Wayne you guys have already dealt with
as far as Dorado's property was not 7.21 to be rezoned LO but just that .54 I
• •
Meridian City Council
March 1, 1994
Page 16
believe it was. And we also are having a little bit of a problem with the 30 feet
carriagment of the 35 foot landscape setback. The way our property is laid out if
we were to rezone it with our home R-8 and the rest of the property CN, Wayne
and I were going to go over there this Friday and lay it out and show you where
our problem was, is that if we use the area that is left for the business conforming
to the setback requirements on the sides and back in this with the 35 foot
landscape it wouldn't leave much for a building at all just because of the layout of
the property and where the house is located on it. I think at this time would like
to request that we be able to work on it al little more these details either with
Wayne or with Wayne Forrey to get these things resolved in order to make things
work for everybody.
Kingsford: That is fine, but we need to go ahead with the public hearing. Other
people would like to offer testimony and then table it at that point. Is there
anyone else from the public that would like to offer testimony on this issue?
Raleigh Hawe, 530 Blue Heron Lane, was sworn by the Attorney.
Hawe: One of the questions that I have on this particular piece of property is that
its an entrance price of property which there is going to be a collector street or
there is a proposed collector on the James Court lane. Now whether or not that
will remain James Court as it would connect tot he Willow Oak lane I believe that
goes on he east side of my property, I don't know. In any event throughout the
hearings we have and regarding this property and other pieces of property adjacent
to this there is going to be a collector in an east-west direction coming off of
Meridian road. It is my understanding that Meridian road for some time is to be a
5 lane arterial I guess. That is the only question that I had on that. At this time
that curve that is in there that is something less than 60 feet that is coming off of
that Meridian Road entrance right now. I suspect its someplace around 30 or 40
feet, but I don't know.
Kingsford: Thank you Raleigh, anyone else from the public?
(End of Tape)
Sciscoe: I only had one other concern and that was I didn't know about this
meeting until Wayne Forrey gave me a call at home until 6:00 this evening. And I
know Bob Angell of Dorado Development would have liked to know too. So, I'm
not sure where the communication breakdown was.
Kingsford: Anyone else from the public? Seeing none I will close the public
Meridian City Council
March 1, 1994
Page 17
hearing. Entertain a motion to table.
Morrow: So moved
Yerrington: Do we need a date certain of 2 weeks?
Kingsford: We need to deal with at least 2 weeks.
Morrow: It would appear to me that really this is a candidate that probably may
end up back at P & Z because we are dealing with several different issues here
which would make it substantially different then the proposal that is before us.
And so it seems to me that 2 weeks is not an adequate time to table maybe 30
days or until our first meeting in April.
Kingsford: Welf, I think certainly in 2 weeks they're going to know what direction
they are going to need to head. I think that staff needs to give them advice as to
where they are headed with it and I would think that 2 weeks ought to be ample
for that.
Morrow: In 2 weeks what they'll do is they will request either to bring it up off
the table or start from scratch. So moved to table for 2 weeks.
Yerrington: Second
Kingsford: Moved by Walt, second by Max to table this for 2 weeks until the next
regular scheduled meeting 2 weeks, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All yea
ITEM #11: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING WITH
A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ELK RUN SUBDIVISION #2 BY THE DEVELOPMENT
GROUP AND JUB ENGINEERS:
Kingsford: At this time I'll open the public hearing and invite the applicant or his
designee to speak first.
Gary Lee, JUB Engineers, 1750 Summertree, Meridian, was sworn by the
Attorney.
Lee: The application before you this evening is for an annexation and zoning and
preliminary plat for Elk Run Subdivision #2. The first phase of Elk Run was
• •
MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: MARCH 1 1994
APPLICANT: DORADO DEVELOPMENT AND AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 10
MICHAEL AND CYNTHIA SCISCOE
REQUEST: REZONE REaEUST
A EN Y COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY EINGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
CITY ATTORNEY: FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CITY POLICE DEPT: "REVIEWED"
CITY FIRE DEPT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
un~~
'~ ~~~ ~ le~,~~
rL v~ a~~~ '~°~',J
c~~~~~ p~°' ~~ Z~w
w'
•
•
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
OFFICIALS
A Good Place to Live
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk
S
i
CITY OF MERIDIAN
GARY D. SM TH
P.E. City Eng
neer
BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt.
JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, waste water supt.
33 EAST IDAHO
KENNY W. BOWERS, Fire Chief MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief
WAYNE G. GROOKSTON, JR., Attorney Phone (208) 888-4433 • FAX (208) 887813
Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211
GRANT P. KINGSFORD
Mayor
MEMORANDUM
To: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission,
Mayor and City Council
From: Wayne S. Forrey, Planning Director
Date: January 6, 1994
COUNCIL MEMBERS
RONALD R. TOLSMA
MAX YERRINGTON
ROBERT D. CORRIE
WALT W. MORROW
WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP
Planner & Zoning Administrator
JIM JOHNSON
Chairman -Planning & Zoning
RE: REZONE REQUEST OF MIKE AND CYNTHIA SCISCOE
AND DORADO DEVELOPMENT FROM R-40 TO COMMERCIAL GENERAL (CG)
At the December 14, 1993 Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting, Commissioners expressed concern about additional CG zoning
along North Meridian Road. The suggestion was made to explore a
less intensive commercial neighborhood (CN) designation rather than
CG zoning with the applicant. The Commissioners then tabled this
rezone request to allow Mr. Sciscoe to meet with the City Staff and
evaluate the merits of Commercial Neighborhood zoning at this
location.
During the past three weeks I have been meeting with Mr. and
Mrs. Sciscoe to review the Commissioners request. Mr. Sciscoe has
considered the merits of Commercial Neighborhood zoning and his
family's business plans. Mr. Sciscoe agreed with the Commissioners
that the CN designation will blend with the neighborhood better and
still allow his business to be developed. Mr. and Mrs. Sciscoe are
very sensitive to good development in this area. They are
committed to being a food neighbor and likewise they want
compatible developmentn~is.st to their property. They believe that
CN zoning will provide adequate safeguards for quality development
in their neighborhood.
Based on my review of our Ordinance and meetings with the
Sciscoe's, I believe that their businesses can be developed within
the CN zone and benefit the neighborhood. I recommend that the CN
be approved rather than the CG zone as requested in their initial
combined Sciscoe/Dorado rezone application. Because the CN zone is
less intensive of a land use, I don't believe that a new public
hearing or an amended application is necessary to facilitate this
change.
OFFICIALS
WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk
JANICE GASS, Treasurer
BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt.
WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney
JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt.
KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief
BILL GORDON, Police Chief
GARY SMITH, P.E., Clty Engineer
Memorandum
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY •
A Good Place to Live
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
Phone (208) 888-4433
FAX (208) 887-4813
GRANT P. KINGSFORD
Mayor
To: Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council
From: Wayne S. Forrey, AICP -
Date: November 5, 1993
Planning Director
W
COUNCILMEN
RONALD R. TOLSMA
ROBERT G I ESLER
MAX YERRINGTON
ROBERT D. CORRIE
Chairman Zoning 6 Planning
JIM JOHNSON
Centennial Coordinator
PATSY FEDRIZZI
Regarding :Request fot- Zone Change from R-40 to General Retail & Service
Commercial (C-G) by Dorado Development plus Michael and Cynthia
Sciscoe.
Zone change and land use request of e-G complies with the current and proposed
Comprehensive Plan. This site is within. the Mixed Planned Use Development Land Use
designation as described in the proposed Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed Com}~rehensive Plan indicates a need for service commercial facilities in this
area. All public services are available or within reasonable service areas for extension.
This request is for zone change only. This property is a small portion of a larger parcel
that was recently annexed as R-40 to allow an apartment complex. As the site
improvement plans are prepared and submitted, City stafil`will review and approve any site
designs to achieve a high quality project as called for in the Comprehensive Plan and in
neighborhood meetings.
,a ~ ~ 1
•
design review process.
(f) The proposed use should not be hazardous or
disturbing to the existing or future uses of the
neighborhood, if the conditions set forth herein are
complied with.
(g) The property will be able to be adequately served
with public facilities, and connection to municipal
sewer and water is required.
(h) The proposed uses would not create excessive
additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and would not be detrimental to
the economic welfare of the community.
(i) The proposed uses should not involve any
detrimental activity to any person's property or the
general welfare.
(j) Development may cause an increase in vehicular
traffic and this problem would have to be addressed in
the design of the area.
(k) That this rezone will not result in the
destruction, loss or damage of any natural or scenic
feature of major importance.
(1) The proposed zoning amendment should be in the best
interest of City of Meridian and the area if conditions
were placed on the land and the applicant.
10. That if the property to be zoned C-N is adjacent to the
property owned by Doris Baret and there will be paved parking
adjacent or near her property, the design standards for off-street
parking in 11-2 414 must be met, specifically including the
fencing; that such design standards shall have to be met where ever
the parking is located; if the Baret property will be adjacent to
the home of the Sciscoe's fencing will be up to the parties
involved.
11. That the Applicants, as a condition of the rezone, shall
be required to meet the requirements of the 35 foot landscaped set
FINDINGS OF FACT & COP3CLUSIONS OF LAW Page 8
back along Meridian Road.
12. That the Applicants must meet all of the Ordinances of
the City of Meridian and all of the requirements of the Ada County
Highway District.
APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby -~e~
Q~~Iraves
these Findings of Fact and Conclusions.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONER HEPPER VOTED ~-
COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE VOTED
COMMISSIONER SHEARER VOTED w~
COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI VOTED_~~~
CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) VOTED
DECISION AND RECO1~tENDATION
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends
to the City Council of the City of Meridian that the rezone
Application be approved as modified above. It is further
recommended that if the Applicants do not agree with these Findings
of Fact and Conclusions of Law that the Application be denied.
MOTION:
APPROVED: ~~
DISAPPROVED:
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 9
•• ~ •
C~OG°~~l
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AD ZONING COMMISSION
DORADO DEVELOPMENT & MICHAEL AND CYNTHIA 3CISCOE
REZONE APPLICATION
2210 N. MERIDIAN ROAD
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The above entitled matter having come on for public hearing
March 9, 1993, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m., the Petitioners,
Michael Sciscoe and Bob Angel, for Dorado Development, appearing,
the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian having
duly considered the evidence and the matter, makes the following
Findings of Fact and Conclusions:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That a notice of a public hearing on the Rezone
Application was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to
the said public hearing scheduled for November 9, 1993, the first
publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing;
that the matter was duly considered at the November 9, 1993,
hearing; that the matter was again considered at the December 14,
1993, and January 11, 1994, meeting, that the public was given full
opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that
copies of all notices were available to the newspaper, radio and
television stations.
2. That this property is located within the City of Meridian
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 1
•, • •
and is owned by the Applicant, Dorado Development Company, and
which property is described in the application which description is
incorporated herein; that the property is presently zoned R-40
Residential but is now vacant land; the area in which Applicants'
property is located has a house located thereon and the remainder
of the property is vacant land; that there is an apartment complex
to the south; there is a residential subdivision to the east across
Meridian Road; that there is a single family residence to the
north; that there is substantial commercial development farther to
the south; that it was stated in the public hearing that the
property being purchased by the Sciscoe's is .41 of an acre and the
remaining property to be used by Dorado Development is 7.21 acres.
3. As stated above, the property is presently zoned R-40,
Residential; the Applicants have requested that the property zoned
General Retail and Service Commercial (C-G) and the Sciscoe's
propose to use the home as a home, operate a book store on the
property, operate a small custom cabinetry and furniture business
at the far end of the bookstore, and Dorado Development proposes to
use the remainder of the property for a single level office
building which would provide tenancy for professional uses such as
doctors, dentist, attorneys, real estate and/or insurance agencies
but the C-G zoning is requested.
4. That the C-G District is described in the Zoning
Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 11 follows:
(C-G) General Retail and Service Commercial: The purpose of
the (C-G) District is to provide for commercial uses which are
customarily operated entirely or almost entirely within a
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 2
• •
building; to provide for a review of the impact of proposed
commercial uses which are auto and service oriented and are
located in close proximity to major highway or arterial
streets; to fulfill the need of travel-related services as
well as retail sales for the transient and permanent motoring
public. All such districts shall be connected to the
Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian, and
shall not constitute strip commercial development and
encourage clustering of commercial development.
5. That the property is contained in a Mixed /Planned Use
Development area as shown on the Generalized Land Use Map of the
Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
6. That the property has frontage on Meridian Road; that
Meridian Road is designated as an Entryway in the Meridian
Comprehensive Plan; that the Entryway Corridors Goal Statement
includes the following statement:
"4.4U Encourage 35-foot landscaped setbacks for new
development on entrance corridors. The City shall require, as
a condition of development approval, landscaping along all
entrance corridors. ."
7. That sewer and water is available to the property.
8. That comments were submitted by the City Engineer and are
incorporated herein as are the comments of the Meridian Fire
Department, the Central District Health Department, Meridian School
District, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, and Meridian
Planning Director. Those comments are incorporated herein as if
set forth in herein.
9. That Planning Director submitted two comment sheets, one
date November 5, 1993 and one dated January 6, 1994; that in the
November comments he stated the zone change to C-G complied with
the Comprehensive Plan, that the Comprehensive Plan indicates a
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 3
•
need for service commercial in this area, and that as site
development plans are prepared and submitted, the City staff will
review any site designs to achieve a high quality project as called
for the Comprehensive Plan; that in his January comments he stated
that he had met with the Sciscoe, at the request of the Planning
and Zoning Commission to discuss the C-G zoning, and it was agreed
by the Sciscoe's that a C-N zone would allow them to do what they
desired but would blend in better with what was already adjacent to
the land; that similar discussions were not held with Dorado
Development.
10. That the abutting neighbor to the north, Doris Baret,
indicating that she was not sure what type of business was proposed
on the property and that she desired that a fence be constructed
between he property and this development.
11. That the property was recently annexed and zoned; that
the requested zone was R-40.
12. T\hat the Limited Office District allows for professional
offices; that Limited Office District, is set forth in 11-2-408 B
7. as follows:
(L-Oj Limited Office District: The purpose of the (L-O)
District is to permit the establishment of groupings of
professional, research, executive, administrative, accounting,
clerical, stenographic, public service and similar uses.
Research uses shall not involve heavy testing operations of
any kind or product manufacturing of such a nature to create
noise, vibration or emissions of a nature offensive to the
overall purpose of this district. The L-O District is
designed to act as a buffer between other more intense non-
residential uses and high density residential uses, and is
thus a transitional use. Connection to the Municipal Water
and Sewer System of the City of Meridian is a requirement in
this district.
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 4
•
13. That the allowed uses in the C-G and L-O Districts are
listed in 11-2-409, and such are incorporated herein as if set
forth in full.
14. That proper notice has been given as required by law and
all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission have been
followed.
CONCLUSIONS
1. That all the procedural requirements of the Local
Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have
been met including the mailing of notice to owners of property
within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicants'
property.
2. That the City has the authority to take judicial notice
of its own ordinances, other governmental statues and ordinances,
testimony that has been previously presented, and of actual
conditions existing within the City and state.
3. That the City of Meridian has authority to place
conditions upon granting a zoning amendment.
4. That the City has judged this Application for a zoning
amendment upon the basis of guidelines contained in Section 11-2-
416 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian
and upon the basis of the Local Planning Act of 1975, Title 67
Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Comprehensive Plan of the City of
Meridian, and the record submitted to it and the things of which it
can take judicial notice.
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 5
• •
5. That the uses allowed in the C-G district are
substantially more intensive than those allowed in the L-O
district; that the Meridian zoning Ordinance allows only the listed
allowed uses to be conducted in that zone.
6. That since there are various proposed uses on the land
requested to be rezoned, including residential, retail, cabinetry,
and offices, which are not allowed uses in all zones. i.e.,
residential uses are not allowed in the General Retail and Service
Commercial district, it makes logical sense to zone for each
proposed use rather than establish one zone that allows many
intensive land uses, which may not be able to be controlled by the
City; the concern of the City is that there is potential problem in
zoning the property General Retail and Service Commercial and allow
the proposed uses under that zone, but then have those uses change
or fail and be replaced by more intensive uses allowed under that
C--G zoning.
7. That it is concluded that measures need to be taken to
allow the proposed uses, but limit the possibility of more
intensive uses later.
8. That it is therefore concluded that the property should
be rezoned to allow the uses set forth in the representations of
the Applicants, but to deny the request to zone the entire parcel
of property as General Retail and Service Commercial; that it is
concluded that the .41 of an acres property to be used as a home
and book store and cabinetry business should be divided and the
parcel to^used as a residence zoned R-8, Residential, with the lot
be
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 6
. - ',
• •
meeting the lot requirements of that zone; that the remaining
portion of the .41 of an acre to be used by the Sciscoe's as a book
store and cabinetry busines S~rghould be zoned C- Community
5
Business District; that the acres to be used for professional
offices shall be zoned L-O, Limited Office.
9. That 11-2-416 (K) of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances
of the City of Meridian sets forth standards under which the City
shall review applications for zoning amendments; that upon a review
of those requirements and a review of the facts presented and
conditions of the area, the Planning and Zoning Commission
specifically concludes as follows:
(a) The new zoning would be harmonious with and in
accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and no
Comprehensive Plan amendment is required; that the house
has been on the property for a substantial length of
time and can be allowed to continue even though the
remainder of t:a property is zoned to commercial and
limited office uses.
(b) The area included in the application is not
intended to be rezoned in the future, but is included in
the Comprehensive Plan as a mixed and planned use area.
(c) The area around the proposed zoning amendment is
developed in a single family residential, multi-family
residential, vacant land fashion, and substantial
commercial Farther to the south and the new zoning would
not be contrary to the existing uses. The land is shown
in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as a Mixed/Planned
Use Development area.
(d) There has been a change in the area which may
dictate that the land should be rezoned, that change
being its designation in the Comprehensive Plan.
(e) No specific information was submitted by the
Applicant regarding design, construction, operation, and
overall plan for the land; that such information will
have to be submitted and development controlled under a
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 7
..
OFFICIALS
WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, C(ty Clerk
JANICE GASS, Treasurer
BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt.
WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney
JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt.
KENNY BOWERS. Fire Chief
BILL GOROON, Police Chief
GARY SMITH, P.E.. City Engineer
• HUB OF TREASURE VALLE~
A Good Place to Live
RECEIVED
CITY Off' MERIDIAl`~
33 EAST IDAHO C~~~'
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
Phone (208) 888-4433
FAX (208) 887-4813
GRANT P. KINGSFORD
Mayor
T 1 8 1993 ,~~ o R~ OLSMA
I~ pA ROBERT GIESLER
~~- ~S~a~i1~Dil1~ MAXYERRINGTON
ROBERT 0. CORRI E
Chairman ZoNnq 6 Planrnr
JIM JOHNSON
Centennial Coordinator
PATSY FEDRIZZI
TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your co me
nts and recommendations will be
considered by the 'w
Mer idian ~ ~t CO-•+~ ~ S
may we have your answer by : _iNeJ tlP trv. r t.l q 3
TRANSMITTAL DATE :
.~i~ l9~ 3 ;
~~,:1-abe.~ ~ NE>4RING DATE : _~ove~-~e~r 9 ~ ~gg3
REQUEST : ~ Z~ {~.- 40 "'~.O ~ vr
w.
~ C
.
p~
G
eY : ~prc3-C~ PAL . 1 i 'g 5
LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT: 22 1 ~ ~'l~ ," Y11P,~•;~~a,~ ~~(
~D f`•~'~'~ 0~ V'1Qii"f y Lx. ~Y` ~eir'i ~ iLQ ~ ~~
JIM JOHNSON P/Z '` "MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLAiS)
JIM SHEARER, P/I ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DLSTRICT
CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION
TIM HEPPER, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR..DISTRICT
RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION"DISTRICT
BOB CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER CQ;-(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
BOB GIESLER, C/C U S: WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
MAX~YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. CITY FILES
,1
BUILDING INSPECTOR /
/~ I~~
OTHER: (/
FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS:... ~'/..B~r`~lii~/f/~~ ,(7t~.ys-~
POLICE DEPARTMENT ~ v f /~qu~ ,..~ ~ ~,~
CITY ATTORNEY /~ ~
~ ~ 'O~v ~L. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~
GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER J
e<urly~7KrJZ ,(alts%~rrss C~ ;ILL lU-2~ecQ n
WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER ~Q~:f ~} L L ~ p,p ~ F¢~{~,s ~y p~ a~ $'/~1op~
• SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS
~~a EXCEL` R~~.~~~~,~ Bob L. Haley
I1 DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT
~. Dan Mabe, Finance 8 Administration
Z~ ~ OII - 3 ~{~~~ DIRECTORS
~~~\~~A 1 to Sheryl Belknap, Elementary
~` CI~~ c;~' ~"1~:~I~~~~Pd Jim Carberry, Secondary
Christine Donnell, Personnel
Doug Rutan, Special Services
JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2
911 MERIDIAN STREET • MERIDIAN,IDAH083642 PHONE(208)888-6701
Z
Q
~~
November 2, 1993
City of Meridian
33 E. Idaho
Meridian, Idaho 83642
RE: Dorado Development Co.
Dear Councilmen:
I have reviewed the application for Dorado Development Co.
This planned development will accelerate the need for Joint
School District No. 2 to construct additional classrooms and/or
to adjust school attendance boundaries. Meridian Schools do not
have excess capacity. Nearly every school in the district is
beyond capacity.
The Meridian School District supports economic growth for Idaho
and specifically the district's area, but such growth produces a
need for additional school construction. We ask your support for
a development fee statute on new home construction or a real
estate transfer fee to help offset the costs of building
additional school facilities. If this support is lacking then we
ask that additional residential development be denied.
Residents of the new subdivision cannot be assured of attending
the neighborhood school as it may be necessary to bus students to
available classrooms across the district.
We ask that you assure the developer will provide walkways, bike
paths and safe pedestrian access.
Sincerely,
a-f/~--
an Mabe,
Deputy Superintendent
DM:gr
1 ,
[ N ~^, lli .~i. ~ ~i a ~ m OA
~x> a ~ n .n m u-> ni ~ ar [u
i m ~ If> o '•
a ua N . m r,.+ n r_`o
t a lf, ~ ~ i ~ ni i:, u^ c[ :n s o
II'f > .v h 1^. O'~
~ O - ~3i n N aT ~, - h n n .F .i rj)
~ o ,i '~ :r ~ d r3> N m m ^, a. an d lL
`.' = of m d ^
[o
~, w
~ e~ [ n ' .:a ~[ u7 IV ism s : :~ u o:.
O rll P d •O ~(ml ~ m m ^Y'] Y iii m h o
.x 2
~ '
a.
i r. _ c.a
._ [.YI 1~ W S N [~- W Z N w
[:. In m ~ F~ m t j m ei [~ en - ~. Ir> 1.-> m
1 ~. : 1
.-.~ ~ h .oa h n_, m n b m P u'> d n b 1 ,aa
.~ dd[~.~ m,iioo[u ~ahmo '.
,s. d r N bLnn s.>a d In
LL ti P Chi ni V 1 m m :o In N [Y .O
pi 1 ti ' 1 1
1
O ,,,1€ .Ir d -~O M d~ N 11'f 1!] a m N QI(iJ II~J l i
J
~. W Lai I
I ae O ~+ <:> o x G K r aN ~L at x ae at ~
Iol_~ •~ooooo~aooO°oo$u°o
ap o'~oooooc~cs~ o~oooo
[-
6~ c>m> N~~ d m ti N L In 1~i b d
.~ P h N ii in [ t4 IA V>
o d d ova -r -> in Ln N i n [u h
Neooo-oca.~ Ind.-.Omo
w N
In ~ In [~ „ m [l] b s m d a [n m 11!
b h O• m~ P^ T -. b In P P
G ! .•.
,,~ N rte. M m T m O d lti d [~ lL m
W d~ h m~ O• b v P~ P .:. •(i ~O m C. .O-.
m hs.
~ ~f' ~O m m m b P m P m d m th P P '.
gc `~ ~ t
N ai. ~ P d h p '
I~ P b m^ O h P m P m nl Op N f P p
yp~ P +N yyp,J I ~ i
S O rt L. '#. O [~ h .ND lil ? ~ n n m 11"I a7h1 .Op n ~
~~ •~ 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 .~ J O O O w l
W
[LI M N N [L Ol a N N N N [L nY N N E
G ¢ i 1! I ~
K >! Y! Y[ M M yf it 9S 11[ u Lt it i! Dt i
Yr>x ooo00.~0O OO aooo ;
~ O O O O .~ O O O 0 0 0 0 ~ G O i
a1W- cn ~ I ( I I
F 1 ~ I ~
~ to • m In m [~ b h O b m O i
'7' h m^ P m m P^ m O N S N D m
I
~ddlnm o d>PP I may ~ m !
1 Y~~'.on Po-m own-m-. .o .r [n [r P I
W m'ii. G N O to [L b~ b m a ~. na I t• b Ij
T y;:~ -: ~ I
p C d!! ~ m .Q [T m m L~ .p ~ m P I
Z Q Y
b m .O. P h O• m P m In In .- m
1 ... [L~~
[ri O ~ y p[ F 1a [~D L`- V ^ j [O ~ P IWn r [P'S -m0 [my
a N- yYP~''
+• i~t :.rt at r
m W ~ ors i.. ov'.)~iii ~oetrmei ~hmN ~~
2 ~ 4 W
N~ +7 W ~. P y 0
ti I a>. '
_ gym.. •a [" d b ~^ r
[gym W ~ mo• [~-In - " -.>lim->.: ti.hr
C p
'J 1.~
[~> [~ O [~ n n. V 3~ ~, r .~. an b b
d~~L m b
C ~ 9'1 d d r. -C ~y~ n ~n [!7 L-. .5 'r ,hu m O
:r
r~ m [n ~.
i
a u .
ru .. [u N lL ...~
I Z ~ ~~1 r. [ c+Lrf -C.o ;a~ .o u+ ~r In o n
'~j m ni `~ -' i
I a>. [,
[y .
~ [s- !' [ail m cii ~ ~'~ 1 u [NU n, n] .i m [~ m a•
!~ x '-
W .-
CZ.I
'r. ~, m ~ N
')
..l 3C +. [ j _ t77yC W
•• L` ,_ - .> >c is n. ~ ~'.~! N ua
I
m m m cr.^.. ~
n> -o m Lr> .o> •
h o i u; [
r
ms
a`. - c', ,
e
LL,
~ ~• L aa. n
H
2
~'y ora, .nm- r-.
s ~ aa- oo- ~ 'u ~, r ~
T ...
•
r~
If .
. ~.
'I
^ _
d M m [~ O
m n P
i .:i i ~ In
u ~ '~
c.>
uc
+' r[.
W
G j ~~
W Z N ti W i' L[i F•-
n w
I LL m nl ii
m
!~ _
m .m.. p
a 1 1 ii In -
u m i{]i 1[oi ~ o
2 ~ ~ m u m
'
i 1
11 l
~ ^ 11 N
C II 1
~
~
f 11 {~>
N an
11 m P m [tl
1i'1' m
J^ d M m
t
p J d
Q
NI
N
11 >i L
i. i
N O Nt pf
~ ip O O 11 '
~ ~ O a u
c o as o N
11
' 11 Lry
' " ^> m [L 11
In a ii
n m
n d u =
u
m n
N
1 y
N M
N
n ~ N
~ f
11 ~ {. n
~ ~ 11
n 11
N
I ij
p 3y
'
~
^
~
1 m R~
M
m
~'
m I
N
h p ~,
m
ef N
y [ O• YO'f ~ M •~! 11
~
M J
a 1y N
1
~ ~
M h 1 O
p~ [~
m ~
a^ O pp
1
~
d
O~
N b
N O
~ J f
ry~
d P. O N O
~
~ a m d h Rmi
O
A ti
M
M
~ m
a ...
N .gyp
n
N
w -+ c
n
p b
m
ii
L .4
1 n
~ .: C
I i
1
1 m
1 W
I
I ~
1
~ '
1 ~'
i ti
~ N-> t
m i
~ c
[+)
[l)
a^
[~> 47 J
[1^) ..u [u ..n
w
M 11 N
W L 1 W
J> 'J L
.x ¢ z
.Y i•r
.JC u ~
[a. ~
.- Yi r y
M •-.
0 M f
~
' W O
m a {m{ m n
'
ti N O
0
0
l
n .
~
O p 0
~ A
T [~D ~. n
n ~
M
11
11
p
i
i
u
i
I [a
~ ~
N ~ [
In -
-~ ~ e d
M
i m b I
S~ g 0
~
h~ ] d .. M 1 11
m~[ N m.'"It I
Q a a a Iryi s ~ ,
1
~ N ~+
an o~G n n 1
D Y
S m t - N
W ft . O] ~ M In
G
_ M
_
~ W O ~ N~.~.
~ s ~ ~ i
I
M
~
LL m
1
ti
1 n m
i [o i a
i
~p
~ ^ In pl H
[[I~4A
[n
=
Q
~
i
[
li V
O
[>. ~ 11
N
~ ua
m it .r
~:
:
a ~ 1 n m
[
.
1
N 1['> O 11 O
n L Ifs 1
[D
.S ~ 11
c`c c~ N [
'
} .
1 "
"
o ..
1
a
f 1
•~ 1 >
w
-
i ~ ° n ~ i
a [
.
a ~~ .
Jmr ~. °
n -o
~
.-
.`. w~ i ': s
~ $: A
11
~ ii .o
i is +
1
. i 11 a> a rt
O 1 11
u 1 p rt
n rt
sr. m n m
t
`
ti n m
s
[. - m
_
, i
d N W
N N
a
yy
S U [u 11 .~ p ~
tL d 11 11
rt
11'> N 11 01 N
aS
1 11
11 1 rt
p
11 rt
P t F N d N
n n
it
1 P M N
~ J [.t1 11 .f
SL
L~
11 M ~
p
r c
" o ii
Y
> O n p
G p d O jj N
~
h
ii o- 11
I
r> ii
N 11
11 In ry
[L
~ i
N
N ~
~ ~
Lti
.~
A [D
~.l
J
[,. .
2
C:I Iti .~9
in `o=c
N S O
W O
s is
i
1
+I
i
s
! d
m
L^ [[t 1
r
~. [D
_ 1
I .-. N7
I m 1~1
1['a 1
~ In
P h
T -0
as z In
r~
.~
m 4
W ~
I 0
r n>
d
L~ Iii
~ p 1
'f
o: F dE
v 4*
~--
t _
u
i
JI r1 V
i ~.:
[m[~
cJ.a "'
O aa>
2' .~
aii.
1 ~]
N
11 N
ry
p
11 p y,
11 O rt
M
N in [
Ll
n rt
~ 11 .! p
N
N V)
11 ~1 11 N n
11
n it J
.L> Q
M J I
N
m ~~ ^ ti
O N ti
O
11 ~
11 r
M
N ~
[.,
T li d
m p '
4 M q '
11-i ii p i
M "
9t li >K M
p 1 ~
M a
1
O 1~ G N O
u
Y n
N
~ N
M
11
m n
i u ~ o~. ~ P
m
ii I a
„
t M
_
.
n
~ u m n ~ N
a -.
A
m N ~. Q C
11 G p O
p ti
N p n Y I~
M
w N
ii M
11
~
d
aa
]
~ 11 ~>
.
U IPl
Rl
^
.. M
1
11
11 - N
p
11 '~
11 p
N m
11 al.>
n ~ 11 b '
u 1
1
m 11 m 1
1~ aD
n
^l 1 1fi
n t [ m
na
u r
N
1~ O M O
o-
i
co
a`['i
au
L
u
o ii •5
11 KT
P ii u>
a 1
~ [ J
l L~-
li
2 11M
W ~
i an 11
n ~
.,^
'_
r .a
Joruw 1
1 s
L?i r. -s
i - =
to ~
,~
.1: [[~ ~ J 11 i .
.T: .i~ iV
P
O•
11'>
0
o•
in
41
lw)
+t
O
~~
~C 'fi~G
JAMES E. BRUCE, President
GLENN J. RHODES, Vice President
SHERRY R. HUBER, Secretary
R.~C1Ei'~1
NOV - ~ 193
CITE' ~.~ ,~~~:~~t~~~~1
November 3, 1993
T0:
Michael & Cynthia Sciscoe
Dorado Development Co Inc
1711 N 30th
Boise ID 83703
•
FROM: Larry Sale, Supervisor
Development Services
SUBJECT: MERIDIAN REZONE - MERIDIAN N/O JAMES R40 to CG
Your application for the above referenced project was approved by
the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District on November 3,
1993. The attached staff report lists the conditions of approval
and street improvements which are required.
If you have any questions,
cc: Development Services
Chron
Meridian City Hall
please feel free to call me at 345-7680.
ada county highway district
318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680
~~ •
INTER-DEPARTMENT
CORRESPONDENCE
JAMES E. BRUCE, President MERRZMER/DSTECH
GLENN J. RHODES, Vice President
SHERRY R. HUBER, Secretary 11- 3 - 9 3
TQ: ACHD Commission
DATE: October 28, 1993
FROM: Development Services
SUBJECT: Meridian Rezone Meridian n/o James R40 to CG
(Applicant - Dorado Development Co., Inc./Michael & Cynthia
Sciscoe, 1711 N. 30th St., Boise, ID 83703)
(Representative - Michael Sciscoe, same address)
FACTS & FINDINGS:
1. Michael and Cynthia Sr_iscoe are requesting a rezone from R-40
~tc~ CG for 1.0 acre of property located at th.e northeast corner
of Meridian. Road and James Court. The requested zoning desig-
nation of CG (General Commercial) will allow construction of
an office building on the site.
This site is a part of a larger area that was annexed into the
City of Meridian this year with a zoning of R40 to allow devel-
opment of a multi-family residential housing project. The
District placed a requirement for a traffic study (not submit-
ted yet) on the plat approval for Bridgewood Park and may be
requiring that James Court be upgraded to a public collector
street.
2. teridian Road currently has 60-feet of right-of-way and is
fully improved with a 41-foot street section. The street was
reconstructed in 1992 and no pavement cuts will be allowed
without Commission approval.
The 2000 Urban Functional Street Classification Map designates
Meridian as a minor arterial roadway. The District requires a
minimum of 90-feet of right-of-way on arterials in an urban
impact area, width sufficient for 5 traffic lanes, 5-foot
sidewalks, and bicycle pathways. The ultimate. right-of-way
will be acquired when a specific development plan is submitted..
3. James Court is a. private street on an easement that is im-
proved with a curb along the south side and 20-feet of pav-
ing. The approach at Meridian Road. is 24-feet wide and is too
ado county highway district
318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680
%~e.ridian Rezone M~dian n/o James R40 to
C+ctober 28, 1993 ~
Page 2
narrow to handle the potential traffic from a proposed 80-unit
~ubdivisiori (Bridgewood Park) at the east end. of the street
along w~.th the existing apartment complex (50 living units
access James Court}, and also whatever may be built on subject
property (assuming it takes access to this street).
4. This application is scheduled for public hearing by the Meridi-
an Planning & Zoning Commission on November 9, 1993.
If the rezone is approved and. development proceeds, the District
will provide the following recommendations to Meridian Planning &
?,oning as conditions. for approval.
SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS:
1. Submit a Traffic Impact Study to the District. Coordinate
with Traffic Services Department prior to beginning the
study. Additional rec{uirements may be imposed pending the
findings of the study and any design engineering work accom-
plished prior to the District's review and approval of the
study, is entirely at the risk of the applicant..
2. Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Meridi-
an abutting parcel (15 additional feet). The owner will. be
compensated for this additional right-of-way from available
impact fee revenues in this. benefit zone.
3. Utility street cuts in the. new pavement on Meridian Road will
not be allowed unless approved by the District Commission.
4. Access to Meridian Road and. James Court will be restricted.
Coordinate with District staff prior to submitting a specific
development plan.
5. Replace unused curia cuts on Meridian Road with standard curb,
gutter and sidewalk.
6. Provide a minimum of 40-feet of right-of-way and a 41-foot
street section on James Court from Meridian Road to the east-
ern boundary of subject parcel. Reconstruct the existing
roadway section to District standards. The existing curb and
4-foot sidewalk may be retained.
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS:
7. Street and drainage improvements required in the public right.-
of-way shall. be designed and constructed in conformance with
District standards and policies..
_ - i•Ieridian Rezone ~d.ian T1~0 James R~Q to~
' October 28, 1993
~~aae ~?
8. nodicated streets and. drainage systems sha11 be designed. and
constructed in conformance with District standards. and ~aoli-
~.ies .
9, Specifications, land. surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans,
design information and calculations presented to ACRD shall. be
::.ealed, signed and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer
or Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with ?daho Code.,
Section 54-1215.
10. F~rovide written approval from the appropriate irriga-
tion/drainage district authorizing storm runoff. into their
system.
]_1. Locate obstructions futility facilities, irrigation and drain-
age appur.terianees, etc.l outside of the proposed street im-
~;~rovements. Authorization. f.or relocations shall be obtained
from the appropriate Entity.
7.2, Continue existing irrigation and drainage systems across par-
cel.
13. Submit. throe gets of street construction plans to the District.
for review and appropriate action.
14. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and
appropriate action by ACRD. The proposed drainage. system
sha11 conform to the. .requirements of the City of Meridian and
sha11 retain. all storm water an-site.
Public street drainage facilities shall. be located in the
public right.-of -way or in a drainage. easement set aside specif -
ically for that use. There shall be no trees, fences, bushes,
sheds, or other ~~aluable amenities placed in said easement.
1.5. Provide design data for proposed access to public streets for
review and appropriate action by ACHD.
1.6. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side
lot property lines when the driveways are not being shared
with the adjacent property.
17. Install a stop sign on Query unsignalized approach of a
project street to an .intersection involving a collector or
arterial as the cross-street. The stop sign shall be in-
stalled when the project. street is first accessible to the.
motoring public.
18. Aright-of-way permit must be obtained. from ACHD for all
street and. utility construction within the public right.-of-
:Meridian Rezone l!~dian nJa ;James R4Q to~ ~° ~ ,.
~ctaber 28, 2943 ~ ,
k~aye ~i
way. Contact c;onst.ructian Services at 345-7667 (with Woning
f.i.le n~unberl :for details.
L9, TS request far madi.ficatian, variance ox waiver of any require-
ment car pala.cy outlined herein shall. be made, i.n wr.itiriq, to
the Manager of Engineering Services within l5 calendar days of
the original Cammisian action. The request shall include a
staterrient t:xplaininq why such a requirement wauld result. in
substantial. hardship or inequity.
Should you have any questions ar camments, please contact the
Develapment Services Division at 345-7662.
STAFF SUBMITTING• DATE C)F COMMISSION APPROVAL:
T~ar~r sale _. ~10V Q 31993
CENTRAL ~~^~~~~~
•• DISTRICT
oRHEALTH l•. Return to:
DEPARTMENT ~ O V - 3 1893 ^ Bose
REVIEW SHEET CITY ~~= ~~~~L~~j~j~~r~ ^ Eagle
^ Garden City
Rezone # ~~tl ~• ~ - Meridian
Conditional Us ~ Kuna
e # ^ Acz
Preliminamry/Final/Sho7~rt Plat
cl/(~~O .(/~/~~6"/`1 LT' % U //Gfi~.~ao la.~ ~5/i/T~ IA ,S /J CO E'
^ 1. We have no objections to this proposal.
^ 2. We recommend denial of this proposal.
^ 3. Spec'rfic knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this
proposal.
^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can comment.
^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewge disposal, we will require more data
concerning the depth of
^ high seasonal ground water
^ solid lava from original grade
^ 6. W
n approve this proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers:
a
2 feet
^ 4 feet
~- 7. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for:
'~ Central .sewage ^ Community sewage system ^ Community water well
^ Interim sewage ~ Central water
^ Individual sewage ^ Individual water
^ 8. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health
and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality:
^ Central sewage ^ Community sewage system^ Community water
^ Sewage dry lines ^ Central water
^ 9. Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding probelm.
^ 10. This department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined
if other considerations indicate approval.
^ 11. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho
State Sewage Regulations.
^ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan reiew for any:
^ 13.
^ Food establishment ^ Swimming pools or spas
^ Beverage establishment ^ Grocery store
^ Child Care Center
DATE: 4 ~ /~
Reviewed by: ~
CDHD 10-91 rcb
- ~ HUB OF TREASURE VALLE~ ~ECEj'V~~
OFFICIALS
WAYNES
FORREY
AICP
CIt
Cl
k A Good Place to Live
COUNCILMEN
O C T 2 9 1993
.
,
,
y
er
JANICE GASS. Treasurer RONALD R
TOLSMA
CITY OF MERIDIA
BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. .
Y o}: ~~~~ fl~ A 1-~108ERTGIESLER
WAVNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney 33 EAST IDAHO L t11~AX YERRINGTON
JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt.
KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 ~p R08ERTD. CORRIE
~~~~~
~®
BILL GORDON. Police Chief
Phone (208) 888-4433 ChairmanZonlny 6 Ptannin
V
JIM JOHNSON
GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer FAX (208) 887-4813 ~, 0 /~ ~ 1993
~r J 3 Centennial Coordinator
GRANT P. KINGSFORD PATSY FEDRIZZI
Mayor NAMPA & MERIDIAN
IRRIGATION DISTRICT
TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEV ELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your co ments and recommendations will be
considered by the Meridian ~ ~,,,,~; s
ma>~ we have your an^wer by : A~ 1 + -ti ~ U q •
TRANSMITTAL DATE: C~C-~•d~~- IS I94'~ :WEARING DATE: ~pUeh~~~(' ~)QJg3
REQUEST: ~ 20~'1P `~'T'~w~ ~" 4~ "'~ zPir-P~n ~ Cpllmar~p,/~ iQ~ CCG~
E3Y: ~Lb~c3.C~a l)PuP.~new~,e__-~ /'.. ~.nn :. L,. _1` .. - r1 __ IJ •- c+- - -
- - - cJ<
LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR RROJECT: Z21O rl~. N11P,r-;~~;a,~ a(
+Je r-N~. c~' G~e~r-~- ~, 1 ors ~1er-~ c1 ~ a '+~cll
JIM JOHNSON P/Z ~_MERiDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z ``MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM ANU fINAI PLATS)
JIM SHEARER, P/I ADA_COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION
TIM HEPPER, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
GRANt KINGSfORD, MAYOR _~.NpMpA MERhD~IAN IRR~.DISTRICT
RONALD TOLSMA, C/C erTT1FRS FRRIGATION DISTP,ICT
BOB CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO'.-(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS}
BOB GIESLER, C/C 1} S:~ WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
MAX~YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. CITY FILES
BUILDING INSPECTOR OTHER:
FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: Nampa & Meridian Irrigation
POLICE DEPARTMENT District has no comment on the rezone for
CITY ATTORNEY ora o eve opment Co. Michael and Cynthia
GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER Sciscoe at 2210 North Meridian Road.
WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER
~ ~ .. ~,~.
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District
! •
RECEIVED
O C T 2 9 1993
CITY OF MERIDIAN
'yla~sr~ui & ~1~~rtdtaoc ~I~uctgutio~c DE~zEct
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-888-6201
2 8 - OCtbber 19 9 3 Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861
Bob Angell Boise 343-1884
Dorado .Development CO. , IriC. SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
P . "' O . ° BOX 2 66 6 Boise 345-2431
Boise, `' ID '-.83701
RE: Land-Use Change Application for Michael & Cynthia Sciscoe
Dear Mr. Angell:
Enclosed please find a'Land Use Change
file with 'the Irrigation District fo
referenced .development." °•
You are also being sent a complete packs
Land Use Change, urban irrigation, and
Application for your use
r its review on the abo~
t of information
exclusion.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel fre
to call on Donna Moore at the District's office or John Anderson
the District's Water Superintendent at the District's shop.
Sincerely,
DAREN R. COON, SECRETARY/TREASURER
NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
DRC/dnm
cc: File
Water Superintendent ~
Michael & Cynthia Sciscoe '~"J~ ~ Q
City of Meridian '~c
enc . `,~J
_,,,._ .
ti =~ -
- 5. "~
.-... -u _ +- ,f ~~l
,,
.. b y ,
~~,~. ,,
-. -
-- ,~.. - '.,~~, ~- ~ a-
~..., --
:;:..-.~ ~-~ ~ APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES
- RIVER FLOW RIGHTS - 23,000
BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS - 40,000
• •
Meridian Planning & Zoning
February 8, 1994
Page 2
held January 31, 1994.
Shearer: I second it
Johnson: Its been moved and seconded that we approve the minutes as written
for January 31, 1994, all in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #1: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR REZONE
REQUEST BY DORADO DEVELOPMENT AND MIKE SCISCOE: TABLED AT
JANUARY 11, 1994 MEETING:
Johnson: Is there any discussion or corrections or questions regarding the
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as prepared by the City Attorney?
Rountree: On page 6, last sentence of that page should read the "the parcel to be
used" insert the word "be", page 6.
Johnson: Under which item?
Rountree: That would have been item #8, its last one on page 6.
Johnson: Any other changes or discussion?
Alidjani: Page 9, I believe this should be approved (inaudible).
Crookston: That is correct.
Alidjani: Page 9, approve of Findings
Johnson: Page 9 change the work denies to approves. If there is no further
discussion I will entertain a motion on these Findings of Facts.
Alidjani: Mr. Chairman, I make the motion that we approve these Findings of Fact
and Conclusions of Law.
Shearer: Second
Johnson: Moved and seconded to approve the Findings of Fact with the 2
corrections noted, this is a roll call vote.
•
Meridian Planning & Zoning
February 8, 1994
Page 3
ROLL CALL VOTE: Hepper: Yea, Rountree: Yea, Shearer: Yea, Alidjani: Yea
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Johnson: Any decision or recommendation to pass onto the City.
Alidjani: Mr. Chairman, I make a motion that Meridian Planning & Zoning
Commission hereby recommends to City Council of the City of Meridian that the
rezone application be approved as modified above. It is further recommended that
if the applicants do not agree with these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
that the application be denied.
Shearer: Second
Johnson: Its moved and seconded to pass a favorable recommendation onto the
City with conditions so stated, all in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #2: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR ANNEXATION
AND ZONING REQUEST WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SPORTSMAN POINTE
SUBDIVISION NO. 4 BY THE WEST PARK COMPANY AND J.J. HOWARD
ENGINEERS:
Johnson: Any discussion or corrections regarding these Findings of Fact?
Alidjani: I have one typing error on page 12, item 19, "net" should be "not"
Johnson: That is correct, we've had that error in there before Wayne.
Alidjani: I've found it in three other places.
Crookston: That is a different language, it is still not. Its tennis language.
Johnson: I thought it was Russian. Any other corrections, discussion?
Hepper: Yes, I've got a question Mr. Chairman, on page 12, it says the minimum
house size should be 1500 square feet and be constructed at a value of not less
than 5120,000 to 5160,000. I think if you have a value of not less than you'd
want to use the lower figure, valued not less than 5120,000.
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETiNG:_ FEBRUARY 8, 1994
APPLICANT: DORADO DE VELOPM E_1d'1' AND AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 1
MIKE SCISCOE
REQUEST: REOUEST FOR REZONE -TABLED AT JANUARY 11, 1994
MEETING
AG CY COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
ADA STREET NAME COMMITTE:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
~"~ ~
~~~ ~ i
~, o
c~~ ~
~" g ~
US WEST:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION:
OTHER:
• •
back along Meridian Road.
12. That the Applicants must meet all of the Ordinances of
the City of Meridian and all of the requirements of the Ada County
Highway District.
APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby ~-
a~~Ira~es
these Findings of Fact and Conclusions.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONER HEPPER VOTED ~-
COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE VOTED
COMMISSIONER SHEARER VOTED w~''~
COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI~ VOTED_~~~
CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) VOTED
DECISION AND RECO1~~iENDATION
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends
to the City Council of the City of Meridian that the rezone
Application be approved as modified above. It is further
recommended that if the Applicants do not agree with these Findings
of Fact and Conclusions of Law that the Application be denied.
MOTION:
APPROVED: ~~
DISAPPROVED:
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 9
..
. C~~p~(
BEFORE THE MERIDIAN PLANNING AD ZONING COMMISSION
DORADO DEVELOPMENT & MICHAEL AND CYNTHIA SCISCOE
REZONE APPLICATION
2210 N. MERIDIAN ROAD
MERIDIAN, IDAHO
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The above entitled matter having come on for public hearing
March 9, 1993, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m., the Petitioners,
Michael Sciscoe and Bob Angel, for Dorado Development, appearing,
the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian having
duly considered the evidence and the matter, makes the following
Findings of Fact and Conclusions:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That. a notice of a public hearing on the Rezone
Application was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to
the said public hearing scheduled for November 9, 1993, the first
publication of which was fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing;
that the matter was duly considered at the November 9, 1993,
hearing; that the matter was again considered at the December 14,
1993, and January 11, 1994, meeting, that the public was given full
opportunity to express comments and submit evidence; and that
copies of all notices were available to the newspaper, radio and
television stations.
2. That this property is located within the City of Meridian
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 1
• •
~.
and is owned by the Applicant, Dorado Development Company, and
which property is described in the application which description is
incorporated herein; that the property is presently zoned R-40
Residential but is now vacant land; the area in which Applicants'
property is located has a house located thereon and the remainder
of the property is vacant land; that there is an apartment complex
to the south; there is a residential subdivision to the east across
Meridian Road; that there is a single family residence to the
north; that there is substantial commercial development farther to
the south; that it was stated in the public hearing that the
property being purchased by the Sciscoe's is .41 of an acre and the
remaining property to be used by Dorado Development is 7.21 acres.
3. As stated above, the property is presently zoned R-40,
Residential; the Applicants have requested that the property zoned
General Retail and Service Commercial (C-G) and the Sciscoe's
propose to use the home as a home, operate a book store on the
property, operate a small custom cabinetry and furniture business
at the far end of the bookstore, and Dorado Development proposes to
use the remainder of the property for a single level office
building which would provide tenancy for professional uses such as
doctors, dentist, attorneys, real estate and/or insurance agencies
but the C-G zoning is requested.
4. That the C-G District is described in the Zoning.
Ordinance, 11-2-408 B. 11 follows:
(C-G) General Retail and Service Commercial: The purpose of
the ( C-G ) District is to provide for commercial uses which are
customarily operated entirely or almost entirely within a
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 2
•
building; to provide for a review of the impact of proposed
commercial uses which are auto and service oriented and are
located in close proximity to major highway or arterial
streets; to fulfill the need of travel-related services as
well as retail sales for the transient and permanent motoring
public. All such districts shall be connected to the
Municipal Water and Sewer systems of the City of Meridian, and
shall not constitute strip commercial development and
encourage clustering of commercial development.
5. That the property is contained in a Mixed /Planned Use
Development area as shown on the Generalized Land Use Map of the
Meridian Comprehensive Plan.
6. That the property has frontage on Meridian Road; that
Meridian Road is designated as an Entryway in the Meridian
Comprehensive Plan; that the Entryway Corridors Goal Statement
includes the following statement:
"4.4U Encourage 35-foot landscaped setbacks for new
development on entrance corridors. The City shall require, as
a condition of development approval, landscaping along all
entrance corridors. ."
7. That sewer and water is available to the property.
8. That comments were submitted by the City Engineer and are
incorporated herein as are the comments of the Meridian Fire
Department, the Central District Health Department, Meridian School
District, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, and Meridian
Planning Director. Those comments are incorporated herein as if
set forth in herein.
9. That Planning Director submitted two comment sheets, one
date November 5, 1993 and one dated January 6, 1994; that in the
November comments he stated the zone change to C-G complied with
the Comprehensive Plan, that the Comprehensive Plan indicates a
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 3
•
need for service commercial in this area, and that as site
development plans are prepared and submitted, the City staff will
review any site designs to achieve a high quality project as called
for the Comprehensive Plan; that in his January comments he stated
that he had met with the Sciscoe, at the request of the Planning
and Zoning Commission to discuss the C-G zoning, and it was agreed
by the Sciscoe's that a C-N zone would allow them to do what they
desired but would blend in better with what was already adjacent to
the land; that similar discussions were not held with Dorado
Development.
10. That the abutting neighbor to the north, Doris Baret,
indicating that she was not sure what type of business was proposed
on the property and that she desired that a fence be constructed
between he property and this development.
11. That the property was recently annexed and zoned; that
the requested zone was R-40.
12. T\hat the Limited Office District allows for professional
offices; that Limited Office District, is set forth in 11-2-408 B
7. as follows:
(L-O) Limited Office District: The purpose of the (L-O)
District is to permit the establishment of groupings of
professional, research, executive, administrative, accounting,
clerical, stenographic, public service and similar uses.
Research uses shall not involve heavy testing operations of
any kind or product manufacturing of such a nature to create
noise, vibration or emissions of a nature offensive to the
overall purpose of this district. The L-0 District is
designed to act as a buffer between other more intense non-
residential uses and high density residential uses, and is
thus a transitional use. Connection to the Municipal Water
and Sewer System of the City of Meridian is a requirement in
this district.
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 4
•
~.
13. That the allowed uses in the C-G and L-O Districts are
listed in 11-2-409, and such are incorporated herein as if set
forth in full.
14. That proper notice has been given as required by law and
all procedures before the Planning and Zoning Commission have been
followed.
CONCLUSIONS
1. That all .the procedural requirements of the Local
Planning Act and of the Ordinances of the City of Meridian have
been met including the mailing of notice to owners of property
within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the Applicants'
property.
2. That the City has the authority to take judicial notice
of its own ordinances, other governmental statues and ordinances,
testimony that has been previously presented, and of actual
conditions existing within the City and state.
3. That the City of Meridian has authority to place
conditions upon granting a zoning amendment.
4. That the City has judged this Application for a zoning
amendment upon the basis of guidelines contained in Section 11-2-
416 of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian
and upon the basis of the Local Planning Act of _1975, Title 67
Chapter 65, Idaho Code, the Comprehensive Plan of the City of
Meridian, and the record submitted to it and the things of which it
can take judicial notice.
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 5
i
•
•
5. That the uses allowed in the C-G district are
substantially more intensive than those allowed in the L-O
district; that the Meridian zoning Ordinance allows only the listed
allowed uses to be conducted in that zone.
6. That since there are various proposed uses on the land
requested to be rezoned, including residential, retail, cabinetry,
and offices, which are not allowed uses in all zones. i.e.,
residential uses are not allowed in the General Retail and Service
Commercial district, it makes logical sense to zone for each
proposed use rather than establish one zone that allows many
intensive land uses, which may not be able to be controlled by the
City; the concern of the City is that there is potential problem in
zoning the property General Retail and Service Commercial and allow
the proposed uses under that zone, but then have those uses change
or fail and be replaced by more intensive uses allowed under that
C--G zoning.
7. .That it is concluded that measures need to be taken to
allow the proposed uses, but limit the possibility of more
intensive-uses later.
8. That it is therefore concluded that-the property should
be rezoned to allow the uses set forth in the representations of
the Applicants, but to deny the request to zone the entire parcel
of property as General Retail and Service Commercial; that it is
'concluded that the .41 of an acres property to be used as a home
and book store and cabinetry business should be divided and the
parcel to used as a residence zoned R-8, Residential, with the lot
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 6
• •
~.
meeting the lot requirements of that zone; that the remaining
portion of the .41 of an acre to be used by the Sciscoe's as a book
store and cabinetry business should be zoned C-C, Community
Business District; that the 7.21 acres to be used for professional
offices shall be zoned L-O, Limited Office.
9. That 11-2-416 (K) of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances
of the City of Meridian sets forth standards under which the City
shall review applications for zoning amendments; that upon a review
of those requirements and a review of the facts presented and
conditions of the area, the Planning and Zoning Commission
specifically concludes as follows:
(a) The new zoning would be harmonious with and in
accordance with the. Comprehensive Plan and no
Comprehensive Plan amendment is required; that the house
has been on the property for a substantial length of
time and can be allowed to continue even though the
remainder of t:~ property is zoned to commercial and
limited office uses.
(b) The area included in the application is not
intended to be rezoned in the future, but is included in
the Comprehensive Plan as a mixed and planned use area.
(c) The area around the proposed zoning amendment is
developed in a single family residential, multi-family
residential, vacant land fashion, and substantial
commercial farther to the south and the new zoning would
not be contrary to the existing uses. The land is shown
in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan as a Mixed/Planned
Use Development area. .
(d) There has been a change in the area which may
dictate that the land should be rezoned, that change
being its designation in the Comprehensive Plan.
(e) No specific information was submitted by the
Applicant regarding design, construction, operation, and
overall plan for the land; that such information will
have to be submitted and development controlled under a
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 7
• •
design review process.
(f) The proposed use should not be hazardous or
disturbing to the existing or future uses of the
neighborhood, if the conditions set forth herein are
complied with.
(g) The property will be able to be adequately served
with public facilities, and connection to municipal
sewer and water is required.
(h) The proposed uses would not create excessive
additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and would not be detrimental to
the economic welfare of the community.
(i) The proposed uses should not involve any
detrimental activity to any person's property or the
general welfare.
(j) Development may cause an increase in vehicular
traffic and this problem would have to be addressed in
the design of the area.
(k) That this rezone will not result in the
destruction, loss or damage of any natural or scenic
feature of major importance.
(1) The proposed zoning amendment should be in the best
interest of City of Meridian and the area if conditions
were placed on the land and the applicant.
10. That if the property to be zoned C-N is adjacent to the
property owned by Doris Baret and there will be paved parking
adjacent or near her property, the design standards for off-street
parking in 11-2 414 must be met, specifically including the
fencing; that such design standards shall have to be met where ever
the parking is located; if the Baret property will be adjacent to
the home of the Sciscoe's fencing will be up to the parties.
involved.
11. That the Applicants, as a condition of the rezone, shall
be required to meet the requirements of the 35 foot landscaped set
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Page 8
.. • •
back along Meridian Road.
12. That. the Applicants must meet all of the Ordinances of
the City of Meridian and all of the requirements of the Ada County
Highway District.
APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby denies
these Findings of Fact and Conclusions.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONER HEPPER VOTED
COMMISSIONER ROUNTREE VOTED
COMMISSIONER SHEARER VOTED
COMMISSIONER ALIDJANI VOTED
CHAIRMAN JOHNSON (TIE BREAKER) VOTED
DECISION AND RECOI~IENDATION
The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends
to the City Council of the City of Meridian that the rezone
Application be approved as modified above. It is further
recommended that if the Applicants do not agree with these Findings
of Fact and Conclusions of Law that the Application be denied.
MOTION:
APPROVED: DISAPPROVED:
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS GF LAW
Page 9
~~ . •
Planning & Zoning
January 11, 1994
Page 2
Johnson: Moved and seconded to approve the minutes with .the
corrections so stated, all in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
,, y, ITEM #1: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR REZONE
REQUEST BY DORADO DEVELOPMENT AND MIKE SCISCOE: TABLED AT DECEMBER
14, 1993 MEETING:
Johnson: Any discussion regarding the Findings of Fact as prepared
by our City Attorney.
Rountree: Since the meeting between the developer and Wayne it
appears that they have agreed to the suggestion that we made to
down scale zoning. I think that would require a change in the
Findings of Fact and I put that forth for consideration. I believe
we will have to change the Findings of Fact because it speaks of
Commercial General.
Crookston: That is correct, the concern that I have is having the
rezone either totally as CG or totally as CN and still have a
residence in there. Under our Ordinances that is not allowed.
Something either needs to be done either the applicant needs to
request that the residence be zoned some type of residence,
residential. The R-40 doesn't align with the density of the single
family dwelling. That just needs to be worked how that is going to
be done. The other concern about even if we could zone the whole
thing as CG or CN is that in the event that it~is zoned that way
then the applicant occupies the house for a period of time and then
says well I'm going to~move my business, then you still have the
property zoned as CG or CN and than a totally more intensive use
goes in that we wouldn't have any input into. I think that is a
concern.
Johnson: What is your suggestion on how we work that out?
Crookston: I think that needs to be addressed with the applicant,
and see whether or not, from his testimony he said he was going
live in the house. So, we need to sit down with the applicant and
see what a proper residential district to rezone the property to
would be.
Rountree: Did you discuss that with him Wayne?
Forrey: Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, we are aware of
this dilemma. Mr. and Mrs. Sciscoe are here, and one of the things
I think we can do in the Ordinance is look at a Conditional Use
Permit for maybe a portion of the use of that property within thee
Planning & Zoning
January 11, 1994
Page 3
Commercial Neighborhood zone. It might be one way to alleviate
that and put some time constraints. So if the property changes
hands we are not locked into a higher intensity use occupying that
home again. And the Sciscoe's have agreed to look at a Conditional
Use Permit type of arrangement.
Johnson: What is your thinking on that Tim?
Hepper: Yes
Crookston: You are saying Conditional Use for the house
Forrey: For the home
Crookston: For the home and with a CN designation for the entire
parcel?
Forrey: Correct, including the Dorado portion as well not just the
Sciscoe but the Dorado property.
Crookston: I think we need to have an amendment to the
application. Or at least an indication that they are applying for
that or amending their application to that effect.
Forrey: Mr. Chairman, would a development agreement be
appropriate?
Johnson: That would work.
Forrey: Ok, something of that nature.
Rountree: Would it require another hearing?
Crookston: No.
Johnson: Thanks Wayne.
Rountree: Would that be stipulated in Findings of Facts or table
it until we get the amendment?
Hepper: I think we need to know if the owners are willing to do
that.
Crookston: They need to sign something to indicate that is what
they want to do. If I receive that I can proceed with the
Findings. So we can have them next meeting.
Johnson: Okay, well then let's get together and do that. Anything
else on that item?
• ~~ ~ i
Planning & Zoning
January 11, 1994
Page 4
Shearer: We need a motion to table those Findings.
Johnson: We need a motion to table it because its on the agenda.
Shearer: Can Wayne prepare findings without a motion?
Johnson: Well, he already has that motion to prepare Findings of
Fact at the last meeting.
Shearer: Are you sure? It seems like we sent that back to review.
Johnson: No, that is why its on there for Findings of Fact.
Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I move we table this item until the next
regularly scheduled meeting.
Hepper: Second
Johnson: Moved and seconded to table this until the next regular
meeting, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #2: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR KING STREET
STATION SUBDIVISION BY D.J. INVESTMENTS AND BRIGGS ENGINEERING:
Johnson: Is there discussion concerning these Findings of Facts?
Hepper: Mr. Chairman, I have a question, the Findings state that
these units need to have 2 car garages per unit, if the developer
decides to go that way it appears that it may be a major re-draw or
re-design of that and I'm wondering if we need to see that or find
out if it is feasible for him to do that, if it is what kind of,
how its going to effect the overall project.
Johnson: At present the Ordinance requires, as I understand it,
the 2 car garage because these are plotted as single family
dwelling units, are they not? So they require a variance for that
Ordinance.
Hepper: I'm just wondering what that requirement
Johnson: And you want to know whether or not that is feasible.
Hepper: I'm wondering if the developer, if that is something he
can work with or if he is going to have to re-design this whole
project and maybe we need to start over on this thing if he is
going to have to re-design the whole thing or should we just go
DATE: ~ ` ~ 9 ~ MERIDIAN
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
AGENCY
MERIDIAN POLICE -
MERIDIAN FIRE DEPT. -
MERIDIAN CITY ENGINEER -
MERIDIAN ATTORNEY -
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE -
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT -
MERIDIAN BUILDING DEPT. -
CITY ~NCIL
APPLICANT;`~Y~D w
REDDEST :. ~ yO J ~
CG
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT -
ADA STREET NAME COMMITTEE -
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH -
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION -
SETTLERS IRRIGATION -
IDAHO POWER -
US WEST -
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS -
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION -
MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY -
MERIDIAN PLANNING DIRECTOR -
COMMENTS:
e~
~~°~Q~~'
~~
ka
OTHER COMMENTS:
• •
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING DECEMBER 14~ 1993
The regular meeting of the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
was called to order by Chairman Jim Johnson:
Members Present: Charles Rountree, Tim Hepper, Jim Shearer, Moe
Alidjani:
Others Present: Will Berg, Wayne Crookston, Wayne Forrey, Gary
Smith, Clifford D. Babbitt, Frank W. Stoppello, John S. Shipley,
J. G. McDermot, Lydia Aguire, Raleigh Hawe, Ira Van Elg, Dave
Roylance, Marty Goldsmith:
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 9, 1993:
Johnson: You all have copies of the minutes and have read them are
there any additions, corrections or deletions? We have a motion
and a second to approve the minutes, there is a minor correction
necessary on page nineteen, second paragraph, additions should be
conditions under my comments there. That is the only thing of any
substance that needs to be corrected. All in favor of approving
the minutes with that one correction? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #1: PRELIMINARY PLAT (REVISED) WITH CONDITIONS STIPULATED BY
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND CITY ENGINEER FOR
VALERI HEIGHTS BY VICKI WELKER:
Johnson: It is my understanding we did not receive the revised
Preliminary Plat so we can't act on this. Is that correct for the
record? Any comments, questions?
Rountree: Do you need another motion to table? Mr. chairman I
make a motion we table that item until the next scheduled meeting.
Shearer: Second
Johnson: Moved and seconded that we table item #1 until our next
regularly scheduled meeting which will be in January, all in favor?
Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #2: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR REZONE
`1` REQUEST BY DORADO DEVELOPMENT AND MIKE SCISCOE:
Johnson: What is your pleasure?
Rountree: Well we had some need for discussion, we don't have the
Findings of Fact at this time.
Johnson: That's right.
•
Meridian Planning & Zoning
December 14, 1993
Page 2
Rountree: The concerns I had with this particular item are
identified in the minutes, but the establishment of the precedence
of potential of strip development starting to go out Meridian Road
with this CG zoning at that location. Two commercial
establishments and an unknown use of residency with this zoning
could very well go to a commercial use as well. It is inconsistent
with our current plan I believe and definitely not consistent with
our proposed Comp Plan. If you want Mr. Forrey to speak to some of
those issues.
Johnson: Before we get to Mr. Forrey, does anyone else have any
comments?
Shearer: Every project that we have and we have a public hearing
on we get the negative side of everything, everybody is against all
these projects. This particular project is in a mixed use zone
which I would say a commercial project fits in good mixed use zone.
The property completing surrounding it or almost completely
surrounding the proposed property is owned by the same owner so if
there is any lowering of land values it will be the same owner that
will suffer those. I think that maybe government intervention is
a little bit to heavy in this. I hope that these people want to do
something with their land, and I think its their land and. as long
as its not damaging someone else I think that we should grant it
and-that is my feeling. And as far as strip zoning, everyone of
these projects that we have put together is going to have to stand
on its own merit because we approved this one is no sign that we
will approve something else. This is zoned a mixed use, or set up
in the Comp Plan as a mixed use.
Johnson: Thank you Mr. Shearer. Anyone else have any comments,
Mr. Hepper?
Hepper: Well I'm a little bit concerned about the CG also. I
think the purpose the Planning and Zoning is to establish good
planning. I'm not 1000 sure that this falls into that category.
I don't have any problems with their proposed use of a bookstore,
I think that is fairly non-obtrusive, they are not going to be
causing any problems, but is does set a precedent out in the area
for CG. I'm worried about the CG, I'd like to.
Shearer: That is mixed use, CG
Hepper: Yes, but it also allows some fairly heavy commercial, so
I'd like to maybe hear some other opinions on it.
Johnson: Moe
• •
Meridian Planning & Zoning
December 14, 1993
Page 3
Alidjani: I do have a problem with the CG zoning also. I believe
Mr. Shearer indicated the individual owns all the land but that is
true today and tomorrow and 5 years from now, but that might not
be true 10-15 years from now and the conflict of that problem is
going to exist at a different ownership some time in the future.
So I will be against the CG zoning.
Johnson: Okay, am I reading this that you feel this needs more
study more input? Would you like to have some comments from our
Planning Director at this point? Do you have anything you'd like
to add to this Wayne?
Forrey: Thank you Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission. During
the Comprehensive Plan public hearings this was one area where
citizen input asked the Commission to expand the mixed use
designation. I think Mr. Raleigh Hawe brought that to the public
testimony, that he felt it would be appropriate to extend that
farther north than just right behind Albertson's. So the
Comprehensive Plan does include this area in the mixed use land
development designation. Perhaps the CN, commercial neighborhood
zone, would be more appropriate. I think the commercial
neighborhood would still allow the bookstore and what the owner is
intending to do with the property, but if it ever sold it would
place some limitations and remove maybe the negative connotation of
commercial general. Maybe CN would be, if the applicant is
willing, and there is also the possibility of limited office, in
some cases some retail establishments can be operated in the
limited office with little more restrictions but it does give some
flexibility. So maybe the issue here is CG maybe the neighborhood
type commercial would fit better with the mixed use plan
designation in the Comp Plan. That is about the only I can offer
Mr. Chairman.
Johnson: Okay, thank you very much. Does anyone have any
questions of Mr. Forrey on this issue? Mr. Crookston
Crookston: The concern that maybe leading this situation is I
think the proposed Comprehensive Plan designates this area as a
mixed use area but the proposed plan is proposed it is not active
at this juncture. The current Comprehensive Plan doesn't indicate
that this area is to be a mixed use are. The other concern that I
heard when I discussed this matter with the commission was having
the entire property zoned CG when the use is proposed were a
bookstore which make it into the CG but the Sciscoe's were going to
use or proposed to use a house as a residence and that was not in
line with the CG zoning and if the City ultimately zoned it CG the
house can be used as a house for a day or 5 years and then can be
r. . •
Meridian Planning & Zoning
December 14, 1993
Page 4
converted to any other use, any other commercial use. I'm not sure
that the CG zoning itself is appropriate to place a residence into
that zoning because our Ordinances now are not a step, not
inclusive of everything below it in that zone. Just because
commercial is allowed does not mean that residential is allowed in
that zone. That was just the comments that I heard in discussing
the matter of the Findings of Fact.
Shearer: Would a CN allow that?
Crookston: No
Johnson: Wayne, briefly, would address the reason you did not
prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of law then.
Crookston: The reason was there was a feeling that this particular
application and the entire area needed to be discussed further to
see if that what the commission wanted to do not only with this
application but in that area since there was some feeling that this
tended or would tend to lead to strip commercial down Meridian Road
and there is also the requirement in the proposed plan about the
landscaping necessary along Meridian Road or into any entrances
into the City.
Johnson: When you say the feeling you are talking about the
feeling of the commissioners? Okay, for the record. I appreciate
that, thank you. I would suggest that the call on this is probably
to table this for further study at this point, unless someone else
has another suggestion.
Rountree: Would that entail the City Planner to evaluate the
potential CG, CN and maybe Limited Office use.
Johnson: It could include anything in there you want it to
include.
Rountree: Are we talking about that in terms of a study or are you
wanting us to sit down and look at it? Do you want a motion?
Johnson: I want a motion that makes you happy, whatever makes you
happy. I think we don't have any common ground, we don't have a
lot of common ground here other than things that are negative.
Probably the best thing we should do at this time is to look at it
further and involve Wayne Forney.
Rountree: Mr. Chairman, I make a motion that we direct the City
Planner to evaluate the requested zoning change further with
r ~
Meridian Planning & Zoning
December 14, 1993
Page 5
respect to the CG, CN or office space zoning categories and provide
the commission with an evaluation of the potential effects how they
relate to the existing Comp Plan and potential problems that might
result with the future Comp Plan and present a recommendation to
the commission next meeting.
Johnson: That was a motion.
Hepper: Second
Johnson: We have a motion on the floor and a second, so stated all
in favor of that motion then? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: A11 Yea
Johnson: Wayne would you be willing to provide us with a short
written document on those items that Mr. Rountree wanted addressed,
thank you.
ITEM #3: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
WITH A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR KING STREET STATION SUBDIVISION BY D.J.
INVESTMENTS AND BRIGGS ENGINEERING:
Johnson: This is a public hearing, I'll now open the public
hearing is there a representative from the applicant that would
like to come forward, or the applicant himself and address the
commission. You need to be sworn by the City attorney please.
Ira Van Elg, 2408 Squire Drive, Boise, was sworn by the Attorney.
Van Elg: Thank you, I'm here to represent D.J. Investments on
behalf of King Street Station. This is a unique application for
Meridian. You probably can't see this picture, many of you may
have seen it as you were coming up to your chairs. We do have a
rendering of the proposed subdivision. This subdivision involves
the development of an Old Town Section of Meridian zoned OT, which
encourages a variety mix of uses including medium to high density
residential development. This application has a proposal that
contains 20 townhouse type units, they come in clusters of 4.
There have been since we met and submitted the application we have
met with the Highway District and drawn up some modifications to
the plan to accommodate the Highway District requirements. As you
can see one of the requirements from the Highway District was that
William Street not be connected to Meridian Road, so we have tried
to accommodate that. We have connected Williams Street to the
project as a secondary access. The improved service will be 24
feet wide there. The other requirement or request that the Highway
District had was that we taper and widen Meridian Road to allow for
`7 ~, ~`~,J9g3
DATE: ~ MERIDIAN
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
AGENCY
MERIDIAN POLICE -
MERIDIAN FIRE DEPT. -
MERIDIAN CITY ENGINEER -
MERIDIAN ATTORNEY -
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE -
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT -
MERIDIAN BUILDING DEPT. -
PLANNING ~ ZONING
APPLICANT • l~nrtn~l~
COMMENTS• ~~
J °-F,~ lam'
,~ S
~c~~e
~~ ~~,.
G~ -~ ~, 2
~"'V
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
ADA STREET NAME COMMITTEE -
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH -
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION -
SETTLERS IRRIGATION -
IDAHO POWER -
US WEST -
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS -
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION -
MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY -
MERIDIAN PLANNING DIRECTOR -
OTHER COMMENTS•
~.
• ~ •
Planning and Zoning
November 9, 1993
Page 9
Hepper: Mr. Chairman, I move the Meridian Planning and Zoning
Commission hereby adopt and approves these Findings of Fact and
Conclusions.
Shearer: I'll second
Johnson: A motion and a second for approval, Roll Call Vote.
Roll Call Vote: Hepper: Yea, Rountree: Yea, Shearer: Yea,
Alidjani: Yea
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Johnson: Any recommendations to the City Council?
Hepper: Mr. Chairman, I move the Meridian Planning and Zoning
Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of
Meridian that they approve the annexation and zoning as stated
above for the property described in the application with the
conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
and that the applicant and owners be specifically required to the
all ditches, canals, and waterways as a condition of the annexation
and that the applicant meet all of the Ordinances of the City of
Meridian specifically including the development time requirements
and the required development agreement and the conditions of these
Findings of Law, and if the conditions are not met to be de-
annexed.
Rountree: Second
Johnson: A motion and a second for the recommendation to the City
Council so stated, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All yea
ITEM #4 : PUBLIC...H~ARINC.: RFQUT FOA REZONE FRQIt p. Rte:
~ ~'' coxi~cru ~~ ~ ~ dE~~xT co.,n~
scTSCO~: ~ 4`
Johnson: I'll now open the public hearing, is there a
representative for the applicant, or the applicant that would like
to come forward and address the Commission, please do so at this
time. You will need to be sworn, state your name and address.
Mike Sciscoe, 1711 North 30th, Boise, was sworn by the Attorney.
Sciscoe: We are looking at getting that corner lot out there as
stated in the zoning request change from R-40 to CG, the property
~~
Planning and Zoning
November 9, 1993
Page 10
to the north is already CG, and we're looking, the Sciscoe's
personally, are looking at the .41 acre lot that is on the inside
of .95 acre that is looking a t being rezoned that is now R-40.
We have a small bookstore that we would like to expand, and we were
looking to move into the Meridian area since we lived here
approximately 16 years ago. We are wanting to get back, we have
been in Boise this whole time. We have a small store now but like
I say we need to expand that store so that we can do more business,
we have traffic to the store its approximately an average of 3
customers a day, it is cyclical though most of our business is in
the summer, I would say from April to September we do a little more
business. -We are expanding the market by doing more mail order
business on a regional basis, so it won't increase the traffic
levels to any large amount but we are basically looking for the
space in a residence for ourselves in this area.
Johnson: Okay, thank you, any questions for the applicant Mr.
Sciscoe? Wayne Crookston
Crookston: I just need a
property in relation to the
Sciscoe: From James Court,
north on the front of Meri
corner in from James Court,
our property begins.
little clarification, where is your
apartments that are in that area?
the south side of James court, to the
dian, its about 177 feet in from the
Meridian Road, north of that is where
Shearer: That is that large home that is there, it was an
engineering office for a while.
Sciscoe: The Ambrose, the old Ambrose house. No they are just to
the north of us we are south of them. There is a small, 1800
square foot brick house there now on a half acre.
Crookston: Maybe you don't know this, but when that property was
zoned or annexed and zoned to R-40 they proposed an apartment type
development also, is that right?
Sciscoe: Dorado? Yes they did.
Crookston: Where then are they going to get access to Meridian
Road to their development?
Sciscoe: I believe they are going to be coming up James Court, is
what the plan is, I'm not, Bob Angell's wa going to try and make it
here tonight too, are you here Bob, maybe he would be better to
address those questions regarding the development of that property.
+ • •
Planning and Zoning
November 9, 1993
Page 11
Crookston: Are you going to testify?
Angell: Yes sir.
Crookston: I'll wait to ask him.
Johnson: Anyone else have any questions?
Hepper: Have you seen the comments by the Ada County Highway
Department?
Sciscoe: Yes, I have, and I'm not sure how much of those are
directed towards us as it would be toward Dorado with the larger
development. We're basically a small family owned business, and
our family is the only one's involved i running it at this time.
Hepper: That is why I was wondering if you had seen it, because
there was, you know I don't seem to have it right here.
Shearer: I can't seem to find it either.
Hepper: Yes, some of the requirements, traffic impact study and
easements and taking our curb cuts and adding curb cuts.
Sciscoe: Right now there are two curb cuts right now on our
property, one because there is an attached single car garage and
there is a detached double car, there is two cuts for ours already,
within the area we are talking about.
Hepper: Anyway, you don't have a problem with Ada County's
requirements?
Sciscoe: As far as I have been able to interpret it no, and I will
need some clarifications as we get deeper into it, but we are
willing to work with everybody and getting this worked out.
Hepper: That is what we all like to here.
Johnson: Okay, any other questions for Mr. Sciscoe? Okay, thank
you, public hearing, anyone else like to come before the
Commission? You need to be sworn, state your name and address
please sir.
Bob Angell, 35 Horizon Drive, Boise, was sworn by the Attorney.
Angell: Perhaps I could clarify and add a little bit, from the
time that, and obviously we are familiar with he requirements set
forth by the City and Ada County Highway Department regarding this
entire parcel which at the time of rezoning was approximately 7.6
•
Planning and Zoning
November 9, 1993
Page 12
acres, .41 acres is the parcel that Mr. Sciscoe has acquired which
consists of what we call the Himmerich parcel the original home
and that would leave us approximately 7.21 acres in the remaining
R-40 zoned parcel which would extend basically 177.15 feet at the
junction of James Court and Meridian Road to the north and then
woula go along In a E
sure you're aware in
and there has been sc
entire parcel to enal
just to the east of
Court, anyway in any
to any development c
and we have developer
squaring off that 17
point in an easterly
James Court and then
the rectangle, it wi
to join Mr. Sciscoe
that parcel into
requirements and to c
the east. We think
property.
asterly Cllrectlon 1058 feet. The roaCl as I'm
Tames Court is presently undergoing renovation
~me dedication of right of way from us on this
ale the other subdivision, its the one that is
the low income apartment project on James
manner we wish to provide a buffer for prior
E any multi-family on the bulk of our parcel
a legal description of parcel 3, which simply
7.15 feet that also goes from this northerly
direction 136.05 feet to run 136 feet along
continue in a northerly direction to close
.l consist of about .55 acres and we've asked
.n a rezone of CG it is our intent to develop
n office use consistent with the zoning
nce again provide a buffer to the property to
that is the hiahest and best use for that
Johnson: Thank you Mr. Angell, any questions of Dorado
Development?
Rountree: What is going to be the width of James Court?
Angell: I think Mr. Sale could probably mention that, it is my
understanding that we'll start out with a 26 foot right of way
which is to be dedicated by the present owners of the low income
apartment project on the south. We are giving 30 feet from the
entire 1057 feet of our parcel, and the developers of the new
subdivision there that is to the east in the south of James Court
is also giving 30 feet so that would be a 60 foot roadway, 56 to 60
feet.
Rountree: Of you own knowledge, is that going to be a public right
of way?
Angell: Yes, you probably asked the question but it is our intent
to utilize the access ingress and egress to our parcel if you
decide to zone it, as per a request from James Court not from north
Meridian Road.
Rountree: The parcel that you want to develop, is that north of
the Sciscoe's?
Angell: No sir that is directly south of the Sciscoe's, it is
1
Planning and Zoning
November 9, 1993
Page 13
nearly the same size if you were to draw that line on a southerly
direction 177.15 feet that intersects with the property line at
James Court you'd have that rectangle in there that is .55 acres.
Hepper: So you're going to be the one that is adjacent to James
Court, that's your property.
Angell: Yes
Johnson: Okay, any other questions?
Shearer: Your intended use is for an office?
Angell: Yes
Shearer: Professional type?
Angell: Yes, that is our hope.
Rountree: You are also asking for CG zoning?
Angell: We're asking for CG zoning.
Rountree: But you're going to build offices
Angell: Yes, most likely
Johnson: This is not on this application though, right?
Shearer: No, this is part of it.
Johnson: Any other questions of Mr. Angel?
Rountree: Is there some reason for not desiring your property to
be zoned Limited Office?
Angell: No, we just thought for simplicity it would probably be
easier to go for CG zone on the entire parcel other than split it
into 2 different zoning requests. I didn't know that it made that
much difference but that is not my call.
Crookston: I'm not sure that the offices would be allowed, not
without a rezone.
Shearer: They are allowed.
Hepper: Is there any access from you property through to the east?
15 ' , • •
Planning and Zoning
November 9, 1993
Page 14
Angell: No, nor was any contemplated we anticipate there will be
most probably a fence or berm or some separation between the
development and the frontage. I would guess that would be a
requirement.
Johnson: Any other questions? Thank you Mr. Angell we may ask you
again further down the road here. Anyone else from the public like
to come forward at this time?
Doris Baret, 2250 North Meridian Road, was sworn by the Attorney.
Baret: I have a couple of questions I have not received all the
information about this parcel about what their intent was, it was
my understanding he was going to have a small woodworking shop and
then I find out tonight its going to be a bookstore so I don't know
whether he is going to live in the residence and have a bookstore
next to him, so I guess I just need some clarification. The other
thing is we have the Ambrose property, and I was wondering could we
have them, or could it be required that they put up a fence between
their property and our property?
Johnson: Where does your property lie, where is the Ambrose
property?
Baret: It is just north of what of their development, or rezoning
request.
Johnson: Okay, that is a good question, we will answer that
question before the evening is over. I'm going to have Wayne
Forrey talk a little bit about the letter he wrote regarding this
application and why its mixed use and how the design and site plans
will be reviewed by staff as they come in. At this point we are
only talking a rezone.
Shearer: Can I ask a question, are you .currently using your house
for residence or?
Baret: Residence
Shearer: It was an office before you moved in right?
Baret: Yes
Shearer: Thank you
Johnson: Any other questions or is that it?
Baret: I think, I was just curious, not really understanding.
Planning and Zoning
November 9, 1993
Page 15
Johnson: Well, if you have any other questions feel free to ask.
Baret: Any other questions?
Johnson: I don't think so. Anyone else from the public like to
come forward. Well, Wayne if you would elaborate for the record a
little on your letter I would like even though your letter is a
matter of record, why this area was designated in the Comprehensive
Plan as mixed use and also about reviewing any site plans.
Forrey: Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, during the public
comments on the Comprehensive Plan the area behind Albertson's as
it was referred to was generally regarded as an area where there
should be good planning and site planning. In the Comprehensive
Plan we identified a mixed use concept, mixed planned use
development as its referred in the Comprehensive Plan as a way to
address these issues where you have different uses together in the
same area and this is an area where we had a commercial development
on the south existing commercial development, Mrs. Baret's
property, the lady that just addressed the Commission, she is zoned
Commercial General, I guess it was formerly used as an office,
across the street is a quality residential neighborhood, there are
apartments in the area, so it was an appropriate designation not
necessarily the specific land use but rather does it blend and mix
and is it compatible from a site planning standpoint from all of
those uses, so I think the key here is if this is approved by the
Commission and by the Council and rezoned the key is good analysis
by the City on compliance with out Ordinance in terms of the
screening, the fencing, the landscaping the access, signage, those
types of things are perhaps as critical as the question of zone.
We are updating the Zoning Ordinance, and its possible that when
Mr. Sciscoe or Dorado submit building plans to the City that we may
very well have new requirements for landscaping, signage, etc., but
I can assure if they submit today we'll evaluate it very thoroughly
against our existing Ordinance. Especially in light of the
development agreement authority that you have on a zone change in
our current Zoning Ordinance. I do believe this zone change
complies with our current Comprehensive Plan and our proposed
Comprehensive Plan and its in a specific area that we had public
testimony on encouraging a mix of uses as long as everyone is well
planned and coordinated. I hope that helps.
Johnson: That does help, it helps the public and I appreciate
that. Just one minute we need to change the tape.
Shearer: I don't believe the Ordinance currently addresses this
screen between commercial and commercial.
Forrey: No it does not
~.
' • •
Planning and Zoning
November 9, 1993
Page 16
Shearer: Which we're, which this screen that is being discussed .
Forrey: That is correct it directly says commercial shall screen
itself from an adjoining residential use.
Shearer: But both of these are commercial.
Johnson: Which kind of leaves them to fend for themselves, really
what it boils down to.
Shearer: Which our new Ordinance I assume is going to address.
Forrey: Definitely it does
Shearer: When and if
Johnson: It is almost if. Okay, any other comments?
Rountree: I've got a question I guess specific to an action we
took earlier tonight in our proposed Comp Plan, which identifies as
corridors one of the entrance corridors into the City with the
setback requirements for landscape for future development, it seems
I'm not suggesting that the intent is here, but this would be a way
to circumnavigate that emphasis in our Comp Plan by rezoning the
frontage property into small lots that can't accommodate the wide
landscape buffer and then develop the further inward properties
into whatever the existing zoning is, I guess that's a concern I
see with the rezone of that frontage property and such a narrow
band.
Forrey: Given the scale, the larger the scale the greater
opportunity we have for a better entrance, the smaller the
opportunity, that is a good point, correct. You know we have an
opportunity in the current Zoning Ordinance to require a
development agreement as part of a zone change. I forget the
citation I think it 417, I can look it up and that maybe is and
item where we can attach to any rezone that the frontage along
Meridian Road be landscaped to at least have that landscaped theme
because it an entrance to the City.
Johnson: That's a good point Charlie. Anything else of Mr.
Forrey, if not I thank you for your comments. Anyone else from the
public like to come forward, anyone else who has testified that has
a question they want clarified further, still confused, maybe not
confused just more clarification? Seeing no one and hearing
nothing then I will close the public hearing at this time. This
would require a preparation of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law.
t '`
Planning and Zoning
November 9, 1993
Page 17
Shearer: Are you looking for a motion?
Johnson: If you so desire, I need to lead by the hand.
Shearer: I move that we have the Attorney prepare Findings of Fact
and Conclusions of Law for this project.
Rountree: Second
Johnson: For the Rezone right? We have a motion for Findings of
Fact and Conclusions of Law and a second, all n'favor?" O~ed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
Johnson: Thank you for testifying. I have one other item I just
want to throw out at you and put in ont he record before we close
and then we can see if anyone else has any other comments. With
the help of the City and Patsy Fedrizzi who is doing some work for
the City specifically I've been looking at some landscape
Ordinances of other Cities, I think I've looked at 8 total and
tried to compare ours as much as I could to theirs . In most of
instances I don't think our Ordinance is very good, it is better
than some, but it certainly is not as good as several that I've
looked and I have only looked at like I say 8 cities north to south
and some of our neighboring cities. I think our Ordinance needs
some work and so does Wayne and some other people. I'm not one for
copying somebody else's Ordinance cause I think you have to come up
with something that is pertinent to your own environment, your own
community, but I don't see any shortcuts to put anything together
without a workshop. I would like to get some material to you
people and have you review it and get some comments back from you
so we can begin the process of revamping that Ordinance with a
little more specific. Right now it doesn't work because its rather
vague and its not very specific in some areas. It lends itself to
be abused, and it has been used as a matter of record. You know we
don't designate for example types of trees, species most Ordinances
do because depending on where you live they have withstand the
drought situation or whatever. In addition to that the size is
lacking, types of shrubbery that sort of thing how far the setbacks
are what concessions you make. You know to encourage landscaping
is another thing, most of the other Ordinances approach it from
kinds of a trade off position, if you are doing, for example,
landscape on off street parking they maybe will give up 5 feet of
the Ordinance requirement for setback if that is replaced by
landscaping and the landscaping is specifically laid out as to how
it is to be designed, how it is to be maintained is another thing
which our Ordinance doesn't address. So we really need to do
i99 3
DATE: MERIDIAN
PLANNING ~ ZONING
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
AGENCY COMMENTS:
CC ~ ~ t
MERIDIAN POLICE -
MERIDIAN FIRE DEPT. -
MERIDIAN CITY ENGINEER -
MERIDIAN ATTORNEY -
MERIDIAN POST OFFICE -
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT -
MERIDIAN BUILDING DEPT. -
~.e a Cs~...a„1~
~ ~-~ ~
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT -
ADA STREET NAME COMMITTEE -
CENTRAL D I STR I CT HEALTH - ~ (~~~C~.~
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION - ,~s-~--
SETTLERS IRRIGATION -
IDAHO POWER -
US WEST -
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS -
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION -
MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY -
MERIDIAN PLANN I.NG D I RECTOR - Se•Q QTTp~+QA eOM~lM~ewb° _
OTHER COMMENTS:
APPLICANT•
OFFICIALS
WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk
JANICE GASS, Treasurer
BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt.
WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney
JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt.
KENNY BOWERS, Fire Chief
BILL GORDON, Police Chief
GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer
Memorandum
• HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY •
A Good Place to Live
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
Phone (208) 888-4433
FAX (208) 887-4813
GRANT P. KINGSFORD
Mayor
To: Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council
From: Wavne S. Forrey, AICP -Planning Director
~.1~
Date: November 5, 1993
COUNCILMEN
RONALD R. TOLSMA
ROBERT GIESLER
MAX YERRINGTON
ROBERT D. CORRIE
Chalrtnan Zoning 6 Planning
JIM JOHNSON
Centennial Coordinator
PATSY FEDRIZZI
Regarding :Request for Zone Change from R-4D to General Retail & Service
Commercial (C-G) by Dorado Development plus Michael and Cynthia
Sciscoe.
Zone change and land use request of C-G complies with the current and proposed
Comprehensive Plan. This site is within the Mixed Planned Use Development Land Use
designation as described in the. proposed Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed Comprehensive Plan indicates a need for service commercial facilities in this
area. All public services are available or within reasonable service. areas for extension.
This request is for zone change only. ,This property is a small •portion of a larger parcel
that was recently annexed as R-40 to allow an apartment complex. As the site
improvement plans are prepared and ubmitted, City 5ta~`will review and approve any site
designs to achieve a high quality project as called for in the Comprehensive Plan and in
neighborhood meetings.
OFFICIALS
WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk
JANICE GASS. Treasurer
BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt.
WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR.. Attorney
JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt.
KENNY BOWERS. Fire Chief
BILL GORDON. Police Chief
GARY SMITH, P.E.. City Engineer
HUB OF TREASURE VALL
A Good Place to Live
RONALD R. TOLSMA
CITY OF MERIDIAI`~~`T ' ~ ~~~~ COUNCILMEN
ROBERT GIESLER
i ' r~ _~. ~''~ r l;' ~ f ~ ' 4+ ~~ MAX YERRINGTON
33 EAST IDAHO Cl ~ '-"~ '''~'• i1''t " ROBERT D.CORRIE
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
Phone (208) 888-4433
FAX (208) 887-4813
GRANT P. KINGSFORD
Mayor
Chairman Zoning b Planni
JIM JOHNSON
Centennial Coortlinator
PATSY FEDRIZZI
TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that >~our co ments and recommendations will be
considered by the Mt:ridian~~r~in ~ Cpvr\; s
may we have your answer by : IJ~ y~w~-~2r t.I q 3
TRANSMITTAL DATE : ~-~-db Q,~` 1S Ig4'~ :HEARING DATE : _~pl~eh~~2d' 9 ~)dJ4'3
REQUEST : 1`~ ZO-'1 P tY'~ w~ ~1' I'IO '~'d S i-n~~ ~ Cpvrw.e,/~CI q.~ ICG~
eY : ~rGC~ ~[ f ~h'1 i
;
5
g
~
h
LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT : ZZ 1 ~ -'l~ . ~P.r;[~~ar• ~a(
rJ D r ~ c~' V~P~t-r ~ ~ ~ ~ nrlP.,r- i C.~ i a ~ ~r~
JIM JOHNSON P/Z NERiDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
JIM SHEARER, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION
TIM HEPPER, P/Z CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR..DISTRICT
RONALD TOLSMA, C/C SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT
608 CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER CQ"(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
BOB GIESLER, C/C - U.S: WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
MAX~YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT.
BUILDING I CITY FILES
/G~ ~~~ ~~~
NSPECTOR OTHER:
FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE RE
MARKS: nJ•~~J~%,~~`,~~ ,7~.s~
POLICE DEPARTMENT ~
of ~ f /7iJvE~ ,cr ~, ~,h~~"„~., ~ ~ .~..(~
CITY ATTORNEY f~ ~ r ,f ~~ d,v ,,~ v 7X.~ La (J: N,.Je f-,.,~ ~
GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER Fu.rn,; ~t.c~~ /3~cs~~v:~x~ c.c,; L-L /~;~t~~y ~ ~,
WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER yv~.,?~ ~- ~ L L C O ~ ~ ~~:~h is 7`N p~ v ~ ,s%•loF'~
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS
Bob L. Haley
E • ~°~'~~
OR Xf`'E! ~~~~ DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT
4 !!- Dan Mabe, Finance 8~ Administration
Z ~ ~ t~ 3 ~~~+~ DIRECTORS
~ Sheryl Belknap, Elementary
C~~-`d, ~~: ~~L1rs~~i;'1'~ Jim Carberry, Secondary
i~\ 1~t Il_ n
Christine Donnell, Personnel
Doug Rutan, Special Services
JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2
911 MERIDIAN STREET MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83842 • PHONE (208)888-6701
2
Q
~1
November 2, 1993
City of Meridian
33 E. Idaho
Meridian, Idaho 83642
RE: Dorado Development Co.
Dear Councilmen:
I have reviewed the application for Dorado Development Co.
This planned development will accelerate the need for Joint
School District No. 2 to construct additional classrooms and/or
to adjust school attendance boundaries. Meridian Schools do not
have excess capacity. Nearly every school in the district is
beyond capacity.
The Meridian School District supports economic growth for Idaho
and specifically the district's area, but such growth produces a
need for additional school construction. We ask your support for
a development fee statute on new home construction or a real
estate transfer fee to help offset the costs of building
additional school facilities. If this support is lacking then we
ask that additional residential development be denied.
Residents of the new subdivision cannot be assured of attending
the neighborhood school as it may be necessary to bus students to
available classrooms across the district.
We ask that you assure the developer will provide walkways, bike
paths and safe pedestrian access.
Sincerely,
a.-~/~-~
an Mabe,
Deputy Superintendent
DM:gr
t' ~ i. .~ .., iia ti.
.xa ~ ~ r
! , WSJ a ~l R Y7 u ~ [ta ~~+ m :_ j .j~
~<a s u - ~~, na w y~ m r Cu
Y9 Ira .U tS. - tf, Cn .a :-., .~ - _ -
~ Ja S Y ~ ti to [
m Y u~ m_ c~ t_r ~ ~-
6 la ~ _ 1~ `a C} tv Ga Li tea ;~, ~ O•
~ O ..a, ~ a ti~ ~ n, R Y'a 3' .y ~ Y a
~ a _ L-' I~ _ _ -
N t~ - „a y _ .~ ~ _
°• _ .. ia~ ~[~ ~ Vim` s: ='..°o.
3
W
U
W L r 1~ r W L to H W S to w
[~ T In m ~ r-. m t~ m va lia m
~ 1 v ~~ c~ 1 m ~~ =o v. a tll •o
va : ~ t~ e ~ ~a li -oo N .... s [~ a o
'i a u-a r• r .. a N Ira
A V• .Y Y'a m [P n M n~ - [~ Pa ' Y r In Y7 m
!r u N r• .~ m m :ta u'a tut w
°a t i
J P :J tL m ~ O• ~, O d m tL Aa N In ~~ •O J
J P~ ~. S ti ~. rn V ~ In r} Y] p f~
~c~.ta +. -ta v9v nln in in mNN ~In
Q
W W _ I f
I ~~ 't 3 L~ x 0 .'~.. O p .~ M x K :.e at
Q O ~~ G O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O p .~_j p.
ao•oo - 0~ovo 000.`-. r. .~oo.~
. J M N m S '3 ti d m N N [L N ~. •a'f J
C 1!a .s irf Y7 t•a to N Y7 1!f
~~ O O O N .~ n O O~-- ., G m O
II r -
b In ^ ~ h w m ti •O ~ .•. .-. m ~ ~ Ian tT t~f•
~ tL'1 ~ P^ P
G -
>' a•~ N t M CD P~ T i' N R N m
W ~ t m .^ tT -O ~ _ ~. -4 ~O to C. ~
m I
7r m= T m? m .•+ m m q. m~ N .O o- ~• N
G .~ m m m .O P ^ d t.a 1~ P P
H
W N~~ m^ O ry P? n 11'9 O N
m P m~ .O In d P^ ~~
~ ~ i
N ~ = _m•. ~ m ° - ~• r .r ~ o tag -o -+ m
1 w
OC tI• rlt i ~ ;
oo.. ., yr• ~.. •o N~.O •-+~rmt~.-.n:om
otv ~ < oR r. .o .na ofnnmlram .two-
v - i
S v M M x M art ~ I aR x x x x l
X 0 0 0 0 '? O O O •~. J O 0 0 c:a
S 4 N N N N N N N d taa N N N N N N N~
u ¢ I i
x a+ ae >~ x x K u a,t it x x i
» x o 0 0 0 0 0 •~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;
Q 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0~
I
t [n ~ i I 1
~ 4l .C9• ~ V f ~ . r ~ . ~ m
r 11'a 0- [~ [ia ^ O• m m~ ~ m O N d I~r1 D m'
'~ ~ ~ ~ I
C ? ~O .iC h P P m ~ tIJ ? P ~. '.
•~o-o-m-_w aud9 o-a i
W m^ •~ N O Y'a N -n ~ I 1
W t^ h m ^ tY .t) i [h O tam0 = •p ~p paj n
°• ~ ~ ~
tV ~ W N ^ -m0 m [sal m _ m N tT ? ~. m O• O
O J C .p m m n d /.~] ~ m P I
x Q , I '
tJ I ._. a tD ~ O• f~ m O• m _ In In .r m
q. T ~ ~ I
c~ O ~ r ^I N m m C• J ^~p GL tV' P IH T to -n m
['i n. I I
W T r~ ~ ~ T a.t - . t yt :R y~
O C W Y9 0 U'.I ~e• tnL ~ N ~~. O ~S m M ~ IPL9 ~ tl.l
N S W ~. ..:. m ~. ~ L ~ O 4 O• [~ to P y O~
>~ ~ i I
y ~~ I LL t0 m r- 1!a :~. 1 rt Y5 nl -? '
m ~ 1 '
C. D
..1 H
V ~ m m ~ ['~ taa .+ -V !u 1>, U9 : 1!9 -D -O
D i~ In x F- -r 9 ~.F In .1a 47 l-~ T 1n y m O
'~ U
:t
:;
= 1 0 + .r 1 a r 'o cn o- v: .r o -o - -o
• U t,V
G' '~ !n 1- S 1I9 :O 1 C- ^ ! tL taV In
6 ~J
j -+ rta .-. tl~ N Iv ... ....
O
i T u m M1 - - N~ a -ti Y, n O m
Vl 1an• m ~) ~ . m 4 ~ I.t 1 m :~U
Ya u. .o- 1~ >• ~ .~ 11 r- S r N d
>_ .
c. c
.a n m a
_~ ta- c n:l 1 rii i u n: ni i inn t~ ~ u~-a
~1 _ -o _ .r < I,a : v: In lu ,a ~ a tv 1ia
W ._.
~ Z
m u
~i~ ~a rn _
~. _ ~ ~c ' _ ~ ~i is ' a
.~ W ..., I U ~ - >C U 1 .i i tY, . .
T ~ ~~ . V _~ ^ W X11
W i- i 1 i Ala . 7 t' ~_ , S: T r • ~ r .]: J:
^ '.eta w Ala J .al I~u :~ -• 11 'J r J Y ~ ria ,~ Q Z H
• _ z o. .+. w. m Ci9 _i
~.____._
t~. c°"'m hi ~ 'e~t9
o ~
d rn :° c.'
- N
~. .~ n u
v_
ti
ti ttl - m 'O [`. .~ u'a
In a m
.L
r
J ,
C - L t ~.
S _
o
:i
R
`J o-
t
U m R
~a
x 1
c:i ~ u
-I
:r
U V
u
W
O ~ d
W L H H W
va
i n
I Z' N --
I
' Y'f
Y
1
I M y7
II m
II
:•[
f Y
11 ~
1 H
X !~~I
i Y m
it
i 11
m
1 ~~
P
I 1
I 11
1
1 i
I
i -
I p ^ O
1 n m
N
m
•
~
11 ~ M
Y ,
M ~
Y7 G
x
•~ r
-
n
M
N I
x T
N '
j
x
n ~
i
M O U
x
1
M
n In 1
M gym., I
'
Y
°) ~
A
• N
-
n I
n
n b
n m
s
~ I
Y m
n
•
LL m c
m t".aa
I - C
~ a ~ u
YI .S ~. .~
- 1 ~• to
o- m N a
1 ~a m r
-
J •~
Q 1
W
x
~ ~ o o `G
u O O v
m N n
a°S-
~ ~ ~
0. ~
m ~
m r m n
IPtf YC'l Y7
r• ~ m r•
d m o- In
~a m d N
o'Oa[°.m
Q t!f -P N
S ilt x x
O O O
o m m m
tmn l4 ak at
x O O O
Q O fO G O
~ ¢ f
t0
N
ua m I
N I
n .p ~
m
~
J I m 1~ l~ tT
d d '
, ~ d m
M. •
i
n f m ~
'
n. U
I Y - tD i
~ N I
I ~a~.
I
ti ~ s
to d Y'a 1
F
I M ~. i -4 x 1
~` H '
M T !A 1
n .~
N p W to Y-s In 1
I ~ W '~ -_ 1
J
P .ta u' j
1
A M I IA R tT• !
M Y7 ~ '
W m N 1'
M 1 N U
l~ i 1 p
u
i w [7 t
I ~ 11'.1 .7 Y7
• ^ N N N
4 [l
~ 11
- .~ Y~ ~~
r•a .:n
to
r 11 a
W 1. W
W .J .1
y ,~ :
S i .:'
.a ~:/ ~`
/[ .1. V_ r
:a
'- 41 i' 3:
1~
.~
`m
m
Y'a
li
ii a
N
M
li
n
11 '
N N ~
N M
9 Ln
G Q ~
1 ~ O
e
1 m .
i O 1
O
m rf I
u"! ...
d
7
1 II
^ ~
P ~
.7
'~
m
tra
~ ~ a
6 I d la
s - N ~
W s to to
x v
~ u t~
- ~ t N
1~ 1.
o• r ~ r-
.[a :Y
tV N
V_ I
a_e x r
~'~Yi via°o
G O ~ t O
~ a [~
w
ti ~ -
N
[L r
[n
~' ~ ~ Y'a
- r. {n rya
- 1A ~ d
4. .- <D ? ~
- ~ I!a L~
o-.r. ~...
tC Y7 F rn
S ~ x ~
O
1Y .-i ~ a'i
. D o=c ~ N
N S O O O
LC = O ~ O
w ~ ~ 1
T [D ~
1 ~
1 1
i I
ti~
m
a
oa
1
w
d
m
W
N
-o
O•
o-a
1 ~a
1
i
•u
1 m y
1 ~ Y'a
I •ta ._
~ ~ O
1-
r•
n
4
~,.
o
1-
i
i
I G
I G
a + ~ u o-
[n n
^ N d m 11 N
tta a d n P [T
J t II tr -O
M I d
- V9 R• ~• 11 ~9
a d n
I Y7 a• n GS 11
I 11 N ~.
i - 1/'a d m b ~ ~
_ M
j P C N X h
i In l` I ^
T ,Q x a9 11
a uln pia ii a+Ni
LD pW. - i 'j w
W m y h a
' W n N
q^ t Y 1
O O m 11 m
•i na cN91 .•. 11 t
Q [J ry
11 O
Y
S 11
11
tV m M ~ I' to
' m m
0 1 .i~~ 1 ii to
~a tY !n 1, abi
1 ~~ ~ Y lY - 11 ~I
1'1 .. 11 ~.U
u ~~
Z Y ~ ~~ 1
pia n i rv
• it
is .~ t n ,
1 ~a r .:9 rn Y ua
J t1•
U ., .t y
i9:" ~ 11 tY 11 t
2
c ~:-
': ~ ~T
IJ r ~ ^ J
1 1~ 11V 11 ~
... '~ ~ :r is .•.
x
O
P
m
m
N
J
Q
O
x
In
N
m
m
b
m
m
O
Y7
O
rn
~1
1I'a
to
t^a
41
..a
.s
L9
fG
W 11
• 11
LL U9 tt n• j
:~-• min u
.~ I tv u
u~ _ 11-a o 1al u
^ Y ~ Al n
' _ ~ u
%'r .~ 1
11
."' 119 = n 11
4
t>_ ry
1. .'., .~ .~
VI ~ ~~ - l^
1~ tJ a 11
~ n-' ~ n no
~I: •- - 11
.ya : a
rY ~= ti T
,tea L Jvi
s ,
y. rr. i
•
L ~'l1VC
JAMES E. BRUCE, President
GLENN J. RHODES, Vice President
SHERRY R. HUGER, Secretary
~~
November 3, 1993
TO:
Michael & Cynthia Sciscoe
Dorado Development Co Inc
1711 N 30th
Boise ID 83703
FROM: Larry Sale, Supervisor
Development Services
SUBJECT: MERIDIAN REZONE - MERIDIAN N/O JAMES R40 to CG
Your application for the above referenced project was approved by
the Commissioners of the Ada County Highway District on November 3,
1993. The attached staff report lists the conditions of approval
and street improvements which are required.
If you have any questions,
cc: Development Services
Chron
Meridian City Hall
please feel free to call me at 345-7680.
:r
ada county highway district
318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680
c~rc
JAMES E. BRUCE, President
GLENN J. RHODES, Vice President
SHERRY R. HUBER, Secretary
TO: ACHD Commission
INTER-DEPARTMENT
CORRESPONDENCE
MERRZMER/DSTECH
11-3-93
DATE: October 28, 1993
FROM: Development Services
SUBJECT: Meridian Rezone Meridian n/o James R40 to CG
(Applicant - Dorado Development Co., Inc./Michael & Cynthia
Sciscoe, 1711 N. 30th St., Boise, ID 83703)
(Representative - Michael Sciscoe, same address)
FACTS & FINDINGS:
1. Michael and Cynthia Sciscoe are requesting a rezone from R-40
to CG for 1.0 acre of property located at the northeast corner
of Meridian Road and James Court. The requested zoning desig-
nation of CG (General Commercial) will allow construction of
an office building on the site.
This site is a part of a larger area that was annexed into the
City of Meridian this year with a zoning of R40 to allow devel-
opment of a multi-family residential housing project. The
District placed a requirement for a traffic study (not submit-
ted yet) on the plat approval for Bridgewood Park and may be
requiring that James Court be upgraded to a public collector
street.
2. reridian Road currently has b0-feet of right-of-way and is
fully improved with a 41-foot street section. The street was
reconstructed in 1992 and no pavement cuts will be allowed
without Commission approval.
The 2000 Urban. Functional Street Classification Map designates
Meridian as a minor arterial roadway. The District requires a
minimum of 90-feet of right-of-way on arterials in an urban
impact area, width sufficient for 5 traffic lanes, 5-foot
sidewalks, and bicycle pathways. The ultimate right-of-way
will be acquired when a specific development plan is submitted..
3. James Court .is a private street on an easement that is im-
proved with a curb along the south side and 20-feet of pav-
ing. The approach at Meridian Road is 24-feet wide and is too
ada county highway district
318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680
~~teridian Rezone n+i~ ldian n/o James R40 to•'
October 28, 1993
Page 2
narrow to handle the potential traffic from a proposed 80-unit
subdivision (Bridgewood Park) at the east end. of the street
along with the existing apartment complex (50 living units
access James Court), and also whatever may be built on subject
.property (assuming it takes access to this street).
4. This application is scheduled for public hearing by the Meridi-
an Planning & Zoning Commission on November 9, 1993.
If the rezone is approved and development proceeds, the District
will provide the following recommendations to Meridian Planning &
Toning as conditions for approval.
SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS:
1. Submit a Traffic Impact Study to the District. Coordinate
with Traffic Services Department prior to beginning the
study. Additional requirements may be imposed pending the
findings of the study and any design engineering work accom-
plished prior to the District's review and approval of the
study is entirely at the risk of the applicant..
2. Dedicate 45-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Meridi-
an abutting parcel (15 additional feet). The owner will. be
compensated for this additional right-of-way from available
impact fee revenues in this. benefit zone.
3. Utility street cuts in the. new pavement on Meridian Road will
not be allowed unless approved by the District. Commission.
4. Access to Meridian Road and. James Court will be restricted.
Coordinate with District staff prior to submitting a specific
development plan.
5. Replace unused curb cuts on Meridian Road with standard curb,
gutter and sidewalk.
6. Provide a minimum of 40-.feet of right-of-way and a 41-foot
street section on James Court from Meridian Road to the east-
ern boundary of subject parcel. Reconstruct the existing
roadway section to District standards. The existing curb and
4-foot sidewalk may be retained.
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS:
7. Street and drainage improvements required in the public right-
af-way shall be designed and constructed in conformance with
District standards and policies..
• i•Ieridian Rezone ~ •idiar. I1~0 James R40 t~~~'~
' October 28, 1993
..'~zae
3. Dedicated streets ~~nd drainage systems shall be designed and
r..onstructed in r_onformance with Distriot standards and oali-
c:.ies .
9, ~pecifi.cations, land surveys, reports, plats, drawings, plans,
design information and calculations presented to ACRD shall. be
sealed, Jigned and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer
er Professional Land Surveyor, in compliance with ?daho Cede.,
Section 54-1215.
~_0. Provide written approval from the appropriate irriga-
tion/drainage district authorizing storm runoff into their
System.
L1. Locate abstractions (utility facilities, irrigation and drain-
age appurtenances, etc.) outside of the proposed street im-
l~rovements. Authorization. f_or relocations shall be obtained
from the appropriate entity.
1.2. Continue existing irrigation and drainage syste*ns across par-
cel.
13. Submit. three sets of street construction plans to the District.
for review and appropriate action.
14. Submit site drainage plans and calculations for review and
appropriate action by ACRD. The proposed drainage. system
shall conform to the requirements. of the City of Meridian and
shall retain all storm water on-site.
Public street drainage facilities shall be located in the
public right.-of-way or in a drainage easement set aside specif-
ically for that use. inhere shall be no trees, fences, bushes,
shEds, or other valuable amenities placed in said easement.
1.5. Provide design data. for proposed access to public streets for
review and appropriate action by ACRD.
16. Locate driveway curb cuts a minimum of 5-feet from the side
lot property lines when the driveways are not being shared
with the adjacent property.
17. install a stop sign on every unsignalized approach of a
project street to an .intersection involving a collector or
arterial as the cross-street. The stop sign shall be in-
stalled when the. project street is first accessible to the.
motoring public..
18. Aright-of-way permit must be obtained from ACHD far all
street and utility construction caithin the public right-af-
CENTRAL
•• DISTRICT
~RHEALTH
DEPARTMENT
REVIEW SHEET
^ Food establishment ^
^ Beverage establishment ^
Rezone # ~~D J ~• ~= -
Conditional Use #
Preliminary/Final/Short Plat i
~-~ i
~~~~ _3 ~~~~~
yy J : ~ ..J
Retum to:
^ Boise
^ Eagle
^ Garden City
Meridian
Kuna
^ Acz
^ 1. We have no objections to this proposal.
^ 2. We recommend denial of this proposal.
^ 3. Spec'rfic knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this
proposal.
^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can comment.
^ 5. Before we can comment conceming individual sewge disposal, we will require more data
concerning the depth of
^ high seasonal ground water
^ solid lava from original grade
^ 6. We
can approve this proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers:
^
2 feet
^ 4 feet
~- 7. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for:
Central sewage ^ Community sewage system ^ Community water well
^ Interim sewage ~ Central water
^ Individual sewage ^ Individual water
^ 8. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of HeaRh
and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality:
^ Central sewage ^ Community sewage system ^ Community water
S
^
ewage dry lines ^ Central water
^ 9. Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding probelm.
^ 10. This department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined
'rf other considerations indicate approval.
^ 11. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho
State Sewage Regulations.
^ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan reiew for any:
^ 13.
Swimming pools or spas ^ Child Care Center
Grocery store
DATE: ~ ~ /g~
Reviewed by: ~ i~°~~
CDHD 10-91 rcb
OFFICIALS
WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP, City Clerk
JANICE GASS. Treasurer
BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt.
WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney
JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt.
KENNY BOWERS. Fire Chief
BILL GORDON. Police Chief
GARY SMITH, P.E., City Engineer
HUB OF TREASUREVAI.L~ ~£~~~~~
A Good Place to Live ~ L ~ 2 ~ #~~,~
COUNC6MEN
CITY OF MERIDIAN-~• ~fy: ;~s~,Y~~,1J~~a00BEATG ES ERA
33 EAST IDAHO ~AxYERRINGTON
~~~~0 V ~® ROBERT O.CORRIE
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
Phone (208) 888-4433
FAX (208) 887-4813 a ~ O C T 1993
GRANT P. KINGSFORD
Mayor NAMPA & MERIDIAN
IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Chairman Zoning 6 Planmi
JIM JOHNSON
Centennial Coordinator
PATSY FEDRIZZI
TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your co ments and recommendations will be
considered by the Meridian •~ ~Ow~; S
ma>~ we hive your an,^wer by : ~ -1~~ F-.. ~ U oI •
TRANSMITTAL DATE: (~-~-~ ~1- ~S I99'~ :::HEARING DATE: ~plJeh~~e.(' 9 ~qg'3
_
RE®UEST: ~1C ZOt'~ 'i'Y` ~._ ~O '~'d
~ Cpr-„hp~ 'q,~ CG~
BY = ~~'L'-~ ~ ! 1
S
'
4
h
.,..~Oe
LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR PROJECT : Z2 1 ~ Yl~ . r~1f/r~~,,a~ ~a(
~D f`•~ Ol' V1P~-r i ~' ova ~P.r`i G i l!t ~~
JIM JOHNSON P/I NERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND fINAI PLATS)
JIH SHEARER, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT
CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z AOA PLANNING ASSOCIATION
iIM HEPPER, P/I CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR ,. NAMPA NERIDIAN IRR..DISTRICT
RONALD TOLSMA, C/C «TTIFRS TRRIGP.TION DISTPICT
806 CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER CO'°~(PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
BOB GIESLER, C/C - U;S", WEST (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
MAX~YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. CITY FILES
BUILDING INSPECTOR OTHER
FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISE REMARKS: Nampa & Meridian Irrigation
POLICE DEPARTMENT District has no comment on the rezone for
CITY ATTORNEY ore o evelopment Co. Michael and Cynthia
GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER Sciscoe at 2210 North Meridian Road.
WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER
~~~ ~ ~,-.
_ it HPnsnn
Fnraman
~
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District
i ~ ~~~~~~~~~.
0 ~ T 2 9 l~~3
Ca~'Y ~,~ ,~r ~.~~?~
~.
1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395
FAX # 208-888-6201
2 8 October 19 9 3 Phones: Area Code 208
OFFICE: Nampa 466-7861
Bob Angell Boise 343-1884
Dorado Development CO . , IriC . SHOP: Nampa 466-0663
P. 0. BOX 2 6 6 6 Boise 345-2431
Boise, ID 83701
RE: Land Use .Change Application for Michael & Cvnthia Sciscoe
Dear Mr. Angell::
Enclosed please find a'Land Use Change Application for your use to
file with. the Irrigation District for its review on the above-
referenceddevelopment.
You are also being sent a complete packet of information concerning
Land Use Change, urban irrigation, and exclusion.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free
to call on Donna Moore at the District's office or John Anderson,
the District's Water Superintendent at the District's shop.
Sincerely,
DAREN R. COON, SECRETARY/TREASURER
NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
DRC/dnm
cc: File
Water Superintendent
Michael & Cynthia Sciscoe
City of Meridian
~0~~(
OFFICIALS
WAYNE S. FORREY, AICP. City Clerk
JANICE GASS, Treasurer
BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt.
WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR.. Attorney
JOHN SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt.
KENNY BOWERS. Fire Chief
BILL GORDON, Police Chief
GARY SMITH, P.E.. City Engineer
• HUB OF TREASURE VALLEI• RECEIVED
A Good Place to Live
RONALD R. TOLSMA
CITY OF MERIDIAI~T ~ 9 1993 COUNCILMEN
ROBERT GIESLER
33 EAST IDAHO CITY GF MERIDIAN MAxYERRiNGTON
ROBERT D. CORRIE
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
Phone (208)888-4433
FAX (208) 887813
GRANT P. KINGSFORD
Mayor
Chairman Zoning 6 Plannin5
JIM JOHNSON
CsntenMat Coordinator
PATSY FEDRIZZI
TRANSMITTAL TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your co meets and recommendations will be
considered by the Meridia n ~ Cpvv~;s ,
may we have your answer by: q
TRANSMITTAL DATE = C~C`,-I-~I~~' I~j~',~~ HEARING DATE : ~yewt~r 9 X1°19'3
REQUEST : ~ 20 r~ P '~'~'ow~ ~ ' yCi ~ ~PXI~•n~ ~ Cpv-.w.CI` ~I ~l. ~ C ~ G~
E3Y: _~rOt.~d U~U~~Dwt~ ~n. 1 ~/Yl i~.ha-~~' A~,,,1 ,,~.~n-~:a S~ ~«.~o
LOCATION OF PROPERTY OR RROJECT: Z2~O ~--~'y1P.r;i~ar~ 1~a(
JIM JOHNSON P/Z MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
MOE ALIDJANI,P/Z MERIDIAN POST OFFICE (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
JIM SHEARER, P/Z ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY' DISTRICT
CHARLES ROUNTREE, P/Z ADA PLANNING ASSOCIATION
TIM HEPPER, P/I CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
GRANT KINGSFORD, MAYOR NAMPA MERIDIAN IRR...DISTRICT
RONALD TOLSMA, C/C - SETTLERS IRRIGATION DISTRICT
BOB CORRIE, C/C IDAHO POWER-CQ':~(PRELIM AND FINAL PLAiS)
BOB GIESLER, C/C U S:~NE5T (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
MAX~YERRINGTON, C/C INTERMOUNTAIN GAS (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
BRUCE STUART, WATER DEPT. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (PRELIM AND FINAL PLATS)
JOHN SHAWCROFT, SEWER DEPT. CITY FILES
BUILDING INSPECTOR OTHER:
FIRE DEPARTMENT YOUR CONCISi* REMARKS: ~ /1
~POIICE DEPARTMENT
CITY ATTORNEY
GARY SMITH, P.E. ENGINEER
WAYNE FORREY, AICP, PLANNER
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and
Laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public
hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30
p. m. , on March 1, 1994 for the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of
dorado Development/Michael & Cynthia Sciscoe for annexation and zoning of approximatley
.95 acres of land located in the Section 6, T. 3N, R. 1 E, Boise-Meridian, Ada County, Idaho,
and which property is generally located on 2210 North Meridian Road. the Application
requests rezone from R-40 to R-S, C-C, L-O.
A more particular legal description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's
office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during
regular business hours.
A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons
shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit
testimony,
Dated this 9th day of February 1994.
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. , Y ERK
•
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Commencing at the section corner common to Sections 6 and
7 Township 3 North, Range 1 East, and Sections 1 and 12,
Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, thence
North 00 degrees 25'30" West, 2141.22 feet to a point
on the section line and on the center line of
North Meridian Road, thence
North 89 degrees 34'30" east, 30.00 feet to a 1/2 inch
steel pin with a plastic cap on the Easterly
Right-of-Way of said North Meridian Road,
thence,
South OO degrees 25'30" East, 42.15 feet along said
Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road,
said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING,
thence,
South 89 degrees 43'16" East, 135.02 feet to a 1/2 inch
steel pin with a plastic cap, thence
South 00 degrees 53'00" East, 131.03 feet to a 1/2 inch
steel pin with a plastic cap, thence
South 00 degrees 53'00" West 174.15 feet more or less, thence
South 88 degrees 06'58" West 132.13 feet more or less, to a
1/2 inch steel pin on said Easterly Right-of-Way of
North Meridian Road, thence
North 00 degrees 25'30" West, 177.15 feet along said
Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road to a
1/2 inch steel pin with a plastic cap, thence
North 00 degrees 25'30" West, 135.00 feet along said
Easterly Right-of-Way of North Meridian Road to
the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING.
I~~-0.c1o 1 ~; scoe
~ez~ne
• •
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the
City of Meridian and the laws of the State of Idaho, that the
City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at
the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian,Idaho, at
the hour of 7:30 p.m., on December 21, 1993, for the purpose of
reviewing and considering the Application of Dorado
Deveoplment/Michael & Cynthia Sciscoe for annexation and zoning of
approximately .95 acres of land located in the Sec. 6, T. 3 N, R.
1 E Boise-Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is
generally located on 2210 N Meridian Road. The Application
requests rezone from R-40 to CG.
A more particular legal description of the above property is
on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East
Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular
business hours.
A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and
all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and
the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony.
Dated this 6th day of D cember 1993.
William G. Berg, Jr., City Clerk
•
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the
City of Meridian and the laws of the State of Idaho, that the
Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a
public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street,
Meridian,Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., on November 9, 1993, for
the purpose of reviewing and considering the Application of Dorado
Deveoplment/Michael & Cynthia Sciscoe for annexation and zoning of
approximately .95 acres of land located in the Sec. 6, T. 3 N, R.
1 E Boise-Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and which property is
generally located on 2210 N Meridian Road. The Application
requests rezone from R-40 to CG.
A more particular legal description of the above property is
on file in the City Clerks office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East
Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular
business hours.
A copy of the Application is available upon request. Any and
all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and
the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony.
Dated this 15th day of ctober 1993.
William G. Berg, Jr., City Clerk