The URL can be used to link to this page

The Landing Phase 4 FP MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING APRIL 14, 1992 PAGE 6 Hepper: Have you talked to Meridian School's about possible school sites? Turnbull: Yes twice. We did sometime ago when we were doing the first preliminary plat, which consisted of 90 lots. They didn't express any interest at that time. When we submitted the application for the second preliminary plat again we approached the School District asking if they were interested in a school site in our property areas there and they declined. They felt it was not central with.the area they wanted to locate. Hepper: Did you have any problems with the City Engineer's comments? Turnbull: No. The traffic study is underway now. Hepper: Do you plan on piping those ditches? Turnbull: They hadn't addressed that. There is the Kennedy Lateral which could be re-piped. Hepper: This development is large enough to afford a partial development of a City Park. It doesn't appear that you have anything in here. Turnbull: No but we are willing to address that. Hepper: Do you have a comment on why the applicant couldn't go R-8 rather than R-4? Turnbull: Basically weave been going as you can see, if you take the first preliminary plat and the second preliminary plat as a total we have something in the order of 430 lots. We have done some larger lots in the current phase. We've been trying to maintain that, but when we get down by the freeway and are impacted by problems that the freeway causes, it's just a matter of marketing. Chairman Johnson: I think what you'll run into there with the City's attitude is`=to buffer that between the freeway with an R- 4. At this point we are discouraging an R-A zone. Turnbull: You can see what we've done on Linder Road and I think 1t~5 done rather niCeTy. Addressed the buffer by the freeway (see tape) - .~ ,~ M[MORANDUM JULY 10, 1992 T0: MAYOR, COUNCIL, PLANNING & ZONING RE: THE LANDING SUBDIVISION NO. 2 (PRELIMINARY PLAT) FROM: GARY D. SMITH, P.E. ~ , I have reviewed this submittal and•have the following comments far your consideration as conditions of the applicant during the hearing process. 1. Some lots need to be reviewed for building area or lot size. a. Size: Lot 25 - Block 8; Lot 28 - Block 1; b. Building Area: Lot 20 - Black 7; Lot 70 - Block 5; Lot 9 - Block 13; Lot 56 - Block 5. 2. Block 5 is interrupted by Waltman Street therefore black numbers and lot numbers need to be revised. 3. A temporary turnaround needs to be shown at the west end of Waltman Street. Is Waltman Street to be considered a collector as our transportation plan states? If so, should right of ,way be 60 feet? 4. Fire hydrant and street light locations need to be moved a little.. The new locations will be forwarded to Johnson Engineering. 5. Any and all irrigation or drainage ditches passing through this subdivision shall be piped, with material acceptable to the users ar maintaining agency, with clean-out structures at maximum `300 foot intervals and grated inlet structure. 6. The 15' wide access between Lots 46/47 - Block 1 shall be an all-weather gravel surface, fenced on bath sides. THE LANDING SUBDIVISION N0. 2 - PRELIMINARY PLAT 7. What is the water source for the pressure irrigation system? 8. All street names shall be shown in accordance with the Ada County Street Name Committee..' 9. The secondary access to this subdivision continues to be a question that has not been answered. Providing stub roads is all well and good b~ actual traffic flow does not take place until the roadways are built and connected. Terry Little @ RCHD said this subdivision cannot build out without the second access. The point where one access can satisfactorily serve must be established and no development should proceed beyond that without access No. 2. 10. Similarly to the access question, water flaw to this subdivision needs to be analyzed for domestic use and fire flow. It is expected that an additional tie to our water system will be necessary. -. rnEyv-oaah p~m ~ .... .. T._.._ . ~ ~E• ~ ~~ IrVq SU,,g1U5~nn YIo.2 ph.ELIm,N,~n~n pc~r 1. SAw-t loft need }o be ~evienn~rd f'or bN~~ldtKq area or In~- Site , T a._ sine ; (~f ZS-,~I,ocrw.8 _; I~~-28-dock! . b. I~u~ ldin7 ~V¢a ~ loE ZO -,l31~ck 7 ; I.ofzo-clock S ; [.~~ ~s/o~: --~~ ~~-ia~o~dJ2~ al~iw~an S!- -F4.,¢re ~nre.k- _. riuy~nhavs~p~~~ b~Yc N1ed ~n ~t ~~:V1S~, - -3 ,-/~ _~ ~ ov~Kba- irn~sind v~,cds ~n h.~ _s h a w~.~.~~'krt._ _ - ---wtst-ead.~~ -hlal {~aigon~' --- _.~.SS Y~/~lf~~,,,, st~.~_b~e. ro~.sid~L a cod o~-foy ~~~J. --- ---. __¢ .. _~i~~-~-d.~mt a,~„ a sent . i q ht ) o cafi.~r„ ~~ o ~ d -fv_ b.e. -- .. ~cvwve_~ a I t~.e-.~'yVan[ lo.ca#-~s~/itl ~ ~i~.r~.d_._. .._...._ .fin ~n ham ~v~a~ i~neerih~ _ . _---- ~-- . _ ._. _.~: _~~ And_~.f ~r[q a~~ or ~r+in gqe _.~.~k~~ac-:~sra~~_~aq !± 'T'his SWbdwiSton Shall be p~pea,W.~h.-yha-kraal. a~up~b~e_~ '~. US~~-s oV Vhgivt~~nlr~ Aclgy~cv~ ~ W i~Gt CGtA~ -~~ii 5ftiuclu~s • ., . _ ~ . .. 2~2 ha etn ~I,EI_!e[¢~~-lur aroytl suv~rt i ~'rh ca.l eh he~1n S~d Qs. ~7 ~nllneL ie .JAL w ~.'._1~~ _ _..~___ ~? ~ u_ _ .__ ___._.__ .._ ._ _L _ sAg1'S~PiyvL- ~~ ~ r 8~--~u--S'f-~D± V; OInM[S S~1 dl ~~ b S,~ dv~N WI a~~tlYGr AMC W 1 u~fvl Sfv~~- Ylannn~. Ln~,n Nn f ~t - ~11Ai ~~" ~LV~d~rt~2c.~1-t d TfhVbl Li'~'~0 (off A~ChI-IQ said ~11nie nehd~iii t~e~n ne~unnl IM~~Id n~.~ XUBOFTREASURgyALLEY • ~ oFwclALS A Good PlEte to Live E~N, CITY OF MERIDIAN "'°' A SAUCE D. ST1/ARf, WaN" Wqb Supt a ~ WAYNE O. CROOKSTON.~R., Atlormy 33 Bqy-rID,~O WUfYERRIN6TON EARL WARD. WYN wu«aupe. KENNY BOWERS. FIn(TNI MERIDIAN •IDAHO 83642 ROBERT D. CORRIE SILLOOROON. pgIp CNN - Plwae(~~~J aw~rlZanMlgl Rannlnq tum sMrtN. uh Ena,nw FAX f~tl~81J ,Iw.wNNSDN GRAM' P.>fn~GRp MEMORANDOM BPRIL 10, 1992 TO: MAYOR, COIINCIL,. PLAN6T]]~ ~ ZONIDiG RE: THE LANDING N0.2 SIIBDI9ISION Preliminary Plat, Zo ei'ivtlan °- FROM: Gary Smith, PE I have reviewed this submit and have the following comments for your consideration as conditions of any actions you may take: 1. A traffic study needs to be done by the developers engineer to determine the impact on Waltman Lane and its intersec- tion at Meridian Rd./East First St. 2. Who will be maintaining the storm drainage pond and pip- ing that exists outside the street right of way? 3. The size of the following lots needs review so as to meet the ordinance requirements: Lots 22-29, Block 6: Appeaz to be too small. Lots 3-15, Block 7: Appear to be too small. Lots 28,32 - Block 1: sppeaz to be too small. Lots 3-7 & 18, 19 - Block 8: Appear to be too small. Lots 2, 20-23, Block 9: Appear to be too small. 4. Is the 15 foot width of access to the flag lots adequate? 5. Is the irrigation easement on the Kennedy Lateral being fenced through by the lot owners or will it be left open? 6. What is the plan for piping of the Kennedy Lateral through Block 5? 7. Zs this development large enough to support at least a partial development of.a city park? 8. What is the water source for the pressure irrigation system? 9. A 10" diameter water line needs to be constructed in Waltman Lane from Meridian Road to and through this development when,the phasing of the development reaches Waltman Road extended. 10. The develtYper needs to analyze the existing sewage lift station for its capacity to serve the area of this development shown on the preliminary plat (347 lots). 11. A 12 foot wide all-weathm gravel or asphalt access ' way needs to be constructed from Greenhead Dr. to the Ten Mile Creek ditch bank between Lots 40/41-Block 1 to provide city access to the sewage lift station. This access way needs to be fmced. QUEST FOR SUBDIVISION AP~ VAL $RBLIMINARY PLAT AND/OR FINAL PLAT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~~° Peb. "13, "1992 ' PRELIMINARY PLAT c:RNSRAL INFORMATION: ' 1. Name of Annexation and The Landing Subdivision No. 4 2. General location, West Side of Linder Rd. S. of Franklin. 3. Owners of record, Skyline Corporation Address 12301 W. Explorer Dr: Suite 200. Boise. Idaho , Zip83704 Telephone 377-4104 4. Applicant, Skyline Corporation address 12301 W.• Explorer Dr. Suite 200. 5. Engineer,Roy Johnson. Pirm Johnson Bngineering. Address 9225 Chinden Blvd. Zip 706 Telephone323-7563 '' 6. Name and address to receive City billings: Name skyline Development Inc Boise Idaho 83704 Address12301 W. Explorer Dr., Zip 38 704 Telephone377-4104 PRELIMINARY PLAT CHSCRLIST: 1. Acres 7.84 Subdivision Features .~ 2. Number of lots 27 3. Lots per acre 3.45 4. Density per acre 3.45 5. Zoning classification(s) R 4 6. If the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridian City limits but within the jurisdictional mile, what is the exist- ing zoning classification In the city limits r~ Page 2 7. Does the plat border a potential green belt no 8. Have recreational easements been provided for Park 9. Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City Yes Sxplaia - 10. Are the proposed dedications of common areas?~~ Bxplain For future parks? cam, Hxplain- PRELIMINARY PLAT CHSCRLi3T: Subdivision features continued 11. What school(s) service the area Meridian , do you propose any agreements for future school sites no Explain ' 12. Other proposed amenities to the City none Water Supply Cit4 Fire Department Citv other Explain .s 13. Type of Building ( Sesidential, Commercial, Industrial or combination) residential 14. Type of dwelling(s) single family, duplexes, multiplexes, single family 15. Proposed development features: ; a. Minimum square footage of lot($~ SOQOSF b. Minimum square footage of structure(s) 1100 c. Are garages provided for, ves square footage ca d. Are other coverings provided for no e. Landscaping has been provided for es Describe f. Trees will be provided for ves Describe 2 for each lot g. Sprinkler systems are provided for ves h. Are there multiple units ~_, Type ,remarks i. Are there special set back requirements no ,Sxplaia j. Has off street parking been provided for ves ,Sxplaia_ k. Value range of property 70.000 - 120.000 1. Type of financing for development Hank 1 m. Protective covenants were submitted 9es, the same as units 1,2 and 3 Page 3 16. Does the proposal land lock other property no ~~ Does it create Baclaves no ~ATSMSNT3 OP COMPLIANCS• _g__ 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be con- structed to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions sill be determined by the City Bngineer. All sidewalks Kill be five (5) fee in width. % 2. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. . ~ 3. Development will connect to city Services. % 4. Development will comply with City Ordinances. .. % 5. Preliminary Plat will include all appropriate easements. % 6. Street names must not conflict with city Grid System2 i t t ~~ I ~~ 0 zy ~.., o 5~ pS F+~ ' A~~~ a; ~5 1 C3"' FZ be ~,y ~'. yam.. y ~. t E x a ~g d 0 1 s E1 ~9~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 3 M~ r ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~.~~~~ ~ ~~l ~ ~~. 1 , I o ~. s N S O - Z ." O ,N ~ N y „ > ~ ~` S SPOON6ILL AvE. s _ ,.~ .aO Y N S P . ~' ' m _ M N '4 s t4 < " N V O .~ I ' _ O Q is ~ D ~ y a~ ~ - a 7 ; ~ J P O ~ Y • 2 t6 ~ O ~Z O1 V © ~_ O 8 O 2 Q w M ~^^ w w t7 N O v! • O m ~~ 31 . 18 ., A = - i tG OqC ~ N ° ~ .a Q Y . OCK S 20 Y. • • ~ t2 ~ 21 • y I " .p t• aY ~ N O g 24 ' e m m ~ u q i ~ 26 i8 , _ ~ 19 ~I 7~ SNIPER WAY ~ ' ro~ u N ~ ~ ~ o ~ .24 ~ ~ 21 ;' {/1 r y ~ : .I Y ~ ~ ~'~ O s PEUCAM MIAr N N c ~W i_ 9 ~ a T~ LANDIl~G 3QBDIVI3ION N0. ~ :';. - i i j: I t ~ y r _ •C. ti "O „ " N ; ~ " " ~o S , f~' ~~ EST TE: ...• • ~ ' 4 N Y~W IV - 0 ~ W V N'Vt a'W NIT O) IV OI SOUTHwES7 77H .~ - AYE. m w a m ~ ( oa u a ~O m ~ o - ;~ W ~ w O KEARNEY PL. f N O z m Q ,^'„ ; 0 ~' ~ a O O w ~ ~ ~ N ~ °, m ~ • p - I O ~ ~ ~ r ~ t0 O a j__ V m I N ~ N , N U ~, • Skyli e • September 21, 1995 Mayor Grant P. Kingsford City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Tiling of Kennedy Lateral Dear Mayor Kingsford: We are proceeding with the Kling of the Kennedy Lateral. In the process of putting this tiling project together, two issues have arisen. The first is that since the northern property boundary of The Landing No. 7 is the center line of the Kennedy Lateral, we therefor own only half the lateral. Tiling is not only required for our side, but will also be required of the property owner(s) on the north side of the lateral when the property develops. A "Late Comers" ordinance pertaining to tiling of waterways is therefore appropriate. At your direction, Wayne Forrey has begun to draft such an ordinance and will be submitting it for Council approval shortly. The second issue which has arisen is as follows: The Kennedy Lateral runs through or along our Landing No. 7 project for approximately 1200 feet. Of the 1200 feet, we co-own approximately 610 feet of the lateral with Mr. Gary Forr's (Mr. Forr's frontage is marked in yellow of the attached plat), and we co-own 326.67 feet of the lateral with the lot owners of the already developed Landing No. 4 (marked in pink). We did not develop The Landing No. 4. It appears that the developer for phase 4 was not required by the City to file the Kennedy along phase no. 4's frontage. However, we are being required by the City to dle our frontage. The City's decision to not require one entity, but later require another entity (Skyline) to file that same section of ditch (all under.the same ordinance) is inconsistent and appears arbitrary. Which raises the issue at hand: If the Kennedy Lateral is to be tiled for that 326.67 foot section, who is to pay for the Landing No. 4 (pink) half of it7 A late comers condition is not possible for the 326.67 feet because the development of phase 4 is complete. We firmly hold that we are not responsible for tiling the North half of the 326.67 feet. The approximate per foot cost of tiling this ditch (materials only) is $60.00. Thus, the cost of one-half of the 326.67 feet would be approximately $9,800.00. There seems to be only two possible solutions. First, the City or Nampa-Meridian pays for the tiling of one-half of the 326.67 feet, or second, the ditch is not tiled for that 326.67 feet. 10464 GARVERDALE CT., SUITE 71O • BOISE. IDAHO $3704 • (208) 377-4104 • FAx 12081 376-6908 ~4: - • your prompt attention and reply regarding this matter is appreciated. Sincerely, J Tucker .Johnson Vice President .:: ti _-_i • ~~~~: Ply- - z-~ ~-q / .~ TE ~.4 Y '~" nlc~} - ~' - ! ~- 9 I i~lc~+ - y-~-~z ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~.. ~,~ - ~~ .~ ,~-~+ - ,o-~~qz '"~~'~ ~l~ ~° ~ <~o~~ ~ Co a ~ ~/~ ~~~ ~~ `~ Try Brighton -Corporation - (formerly Skyline Corporation) October 9, 1992 Jack Niemann MERIDIAN CITY 33 E. Idaho Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 Dear Jack: Skyline Corporation has been developing gmality properties in the Treasure Valley since 1968, including more than 2,500 single family residential building lots. Because of a recent ownership restructuring, we are pleased to announce our name for the future Brighton Corporation. As we move into the future, we commit ourselves to developing the premier properties in the valley and look forward to expanding and enhancing our working relationships wilt you. Brighton Corporation is managed under tbe direction of David Tumbull as president, Mike Tanner as an officer and project manager, and Loretta Taylor as office manager and accountant. Lauri Stones handles receptionist and secretarial duties and Pat Hurley is in charge of project landscaping and irrigation systems. Our offices remain at Boise Research Center. Please note, however, that our new telephone number is 378-4000. Brighton Corporation remains one of the oldest, largest, and most financially stable developers in the valley. We have just completed the final phases of DeMeyer Centennial and Southwestern Subdivisions and are continuing development of new phases of The I•Lrlrories, Waldea Pond, Mallard Landing, and Breckenridge Tn order to give you more information on the changes within the company as well as our current and future projects we invite you to an open house at our offices on R'ednesday, October 28 be[ween noon and 6:00 PM. We look forward to showing you through our offices, introducing our staff and becoming better acquainted. We are enclosing Brighton Coiporation business cards and rolodex cards for your information and convenience. We welcome your inquiries, appreciate your association, and look forward to a continued and renewed relationship. Sincerely David W. Tumbull enclosures ~i 8 . ® N ' a p , 4 C~ a a z H ~~ x~ ~a~ ~~ a ~ ~~ ~~ O F W N E ~ U ~ ~~~ A N ~. ~; ., Q~ lYl ~ Cd t -i tiiJ -, ~ `- ~ a cL .~ ~] N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y pp p~ h E~ f~A fA ~ ~ W W C7 W ~~~ ~ ~ ~ '$ -~ ~~ ~ ~ •, i ~~~- ~ _ a~~~ O ~ ~ a y' N E ~ 01 '~'~ ~"~ N ~ ,y ~ o .a7 o f. M ~ W N ~~ ~~ ~~ a ~. H '" ~r E N ~~ ~~ar~ ~ a ~ H ~' ~ iC a ~~ a~~ ~ gg~ '[.jam. ~.1 ~ ~ ~ r£] ~ Q~ F~ ~ ~ y~ • W ~ ~ ~ ~ £ O EE E. W h U V VJ ~~ E O J S v M ~ v v~ fyyA W ~ ~ ~ O ~ (~W~~j ~ 4 t}~. 4 O W ~ o E ra+ ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L RBQUBST FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PRBLIMINARY PLAT AND/OR FINAL PLAT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION sue. 18, 19ea PRBLIMINARY PLAT GSNBRAL INFORMATION: 1. Name of Annexation and The Landing Subdivision No. 4 2. General location, West Side of Linder Rd 3 of Franklin. 3. Owners of record, Skvline Corporation Address 12301 W Sxplorer Dr Suite 200 Boise. Idaho , Zip83704 Telephone 377-4104 4. Applicant, Skvline Corporation address 12301 W.~ Sxplorer Dr Suite 200. 5. gngineer,Rov Johnson. Firm Johnson Bnaineerina Address 9225 Chinden Blvd. Zip83706 Telephone323-7563 6. Name and address to receive City billings: Name Skvline Development Inc Boise Idaho 83704 Address~2301 W Sxplorer Dr., Zip83704 Telephone377-4104 PRBLIMINARY PLAT CHBCRLIST: Subdivision Features ~./ 1. Acres 7.84 2. Number of lots 27 3. Lots per acre 3.45 4. Density per acre 3.45 5. Zoning classification(s) R 4 if the proposed subdivision is outside the Meridian City limits but within the jurisdictional mile, what is the exist- ing zoning classification In the city limits Page 2 7. Does the plat border a potential green belt no 8, Have recreational easements been provided for Park 9, Are there proposed recreational amenities to the City Yes Sxplain - 10. Are the proposed dedications of common areas?~ Sxplain For future parks?~, Sxplain- PRSLIMINARY PLAT CHSCRLIST: Subdivision features continued 11. What school(s) service the area Meridian do you propose aaY agreements for future school sites no Sxplain School District declined prooert for school site 12. Other proposed amenities to the City none , Water Supplq cit Fire Department City other Bxplain 13. Type of Building ( Residential, Commercial, Industrial or combination) residential 14. Type of dwelling(s) single family, duplexes, multiplexes, sinale family 15. Proposed development features: i a. Minimum square footage of lot($h O8 pOSF b. Minimum square footage of structure(s) 1100 c. Are garages provided for, yes square footage ca d. Are other coverings provided for no e. Landscaping has been provided for yes Describe f. Trees will be provided for yes Descrioe ~ xor eacn loL g. Sprinkler systems are provided for yes h. Are there multiple units ~, Type ,remarks i. Are there special set back requirements no ,Sxplain_ j. Has off attest parking been provided for yes ,Sxplain_ k. Value range of property 70.000 - 120.000 1. Type of financing for development Bank 1 m. Protectige covenants were submitted 9e8, the same as units 1,2 and 3 • Page 3 - 16. Does the proposal land lock other property no Does it create Enclaves no RTAT~SNTS OF COMPLIANCE: ~7 _ 1. Streets, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be con- structed to standards as required by Ada County Highway District and Meridian Ordinance. Dimensions will be determined by the City Engineer. All sidewalks will be five (5) fee in width. ~ 2. Proposed use is in conformance with the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. R 3. Development will connect to city Services. 7~, 4. Development will comply with City Ordinances. R 5. Preliminary Plat will include all appropriate easements. R 6. Street names must not conflict with city Grid System., i s /.. • • F s ~.. m~®~I ~~ d'~ O z; z~ o v] ~ ~~~ ~~ .~ C1 ~~~ ~t ~ ` S+ y ~/ •~~ a. urnicn nuw r i ee_ ~e 15.191 e s~ ~~~ ~~ ^ ~. ~~~~ ~'~ ~9~~ ~9~ el 4 d ~~ O ~3 S t~ @t 9r e s: a #E a ~~~~~ TSB LANDING p ~ m~ ~ ' a ~ N N = m m ~ ~' A p! J ~ ~ ~0 a = ~ w N ~ ~N ~ N N -! N (TIaI W N~i~ W ~"Z N - a n L I N - W N IaIW N- O t0 m V ~CI1IN aIW NI-~.T1 m IV N J~ SOUTHWEST 7TH .~ - AYE. m cn a m CA ~ o ~ c^'i N a ~° m m o =~ .v S T O KEARNEY PL. z N .WC z m Q ~N„ ~ o `~ A "~ Meridian City Council December 21, 1993 Page 16 P & Z for the request for rezoning from RT to R-40 Jerrie Wolfe and Associates, roll call vote ROLL CALL VOTE: Yerrington - Yes, Giesler - Yes, Corrie - Yes, Tolsma - Yes. MOTION CARRIED: All yea Kingsford: Is there a motion to have the City Attorney draw up a City Ordinance? Yerrington: So moved Giesler: Second Kingsford: Moved by Max, second by Bob Giesler to have the City Attorney prepare an Ordinance Annexing and zoning a property, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All yea ITEM #7: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING TO R-4 FOR EDWARD A. JOHNSON: !/~ LlGrtC~i'h/ #7 Kingsford: At this time I will open the public hearing and invite the applicant or his designee to come forward and begin, state your name, address and be sworn please? Ted Johnson, 5330 Farrel Street, Boise, was sworn by the Attorney. Annexation ofo l0 acreso f ground that~are outlined einsthegpackage you received on pages 7 and 8. Its' a 10 acre piece that adjoins the Mallard Landing Subdivision on the west and a little bit on the south. Its an expensive piece of ground and the only reason I try to build is to get another access in there as has been requested previously. The Annexation has been requested by both myself and the land owner who intends to retain ownership of about 2.5 acres of land on the northwest corner of the parcel. I read the conclusions that have been prepared and i only have 2 questions. I haven't seen any. agreements, any development agreements nor have I in the 27 years of developing have entered into one so I don't know what that contains but I'm sure it can be worked out. I do have a question having to do with the tiling of the ditch action that effect i have filed an application for variance. ~ el pin the of the ditch the Rennedy Lateral will bisect this par _ er0 eSe t0 file it no matter what1the size was,abuptotrthe other Part P 1~ Meridian City Council December 21, 1993 Page 17 of it, the part going from the northern boundary of the parcel clear up to Linder Road is a large irrigation ditch and it borders the property on the one side, we actually go half way out the boundary is half way into the middle of the ditch. We have not prepared to address the question of variance, we don't know what your pleasure is in terms of pursuing that question. Our engineering people have indicated that based on their calculations 54 inch pipe would be required through that ditch. There is a 6 foot squash pipe on the one end and a 6 foot round pipe on the other end. His calculations indicate a 54 inch pipe would be the minimum requirement. Depending upon your pleasure, we could either present more data on that or we could work with the City Engineer as the time comes to determine whether or not that variance is going to be allowed or not. The other issue has to do with one comment made here which I think was probably a bit of a misunderstanding in the conversations in the Planning and Zoning hearing, paragraph 14 about the middle, it mentions a buffering from I-84. The question of the buffering on I-84 was raised really as I remember the conversation with regard to what was going to happen with the balance of our ground further to the east and south. The south boundary of this particular l0 acre parcel is a 1/4 mile away from the I-84 and for that reason we don't think that there is any need for buffering exists. We have full plans and specifications prepared for buffering that portion of the other ground the 40 acres to the south and east as it abuts the freeway but it doesn't have anything to do with this piece, like I say its a 1/4 mile away. I think it was a misunderstanding in the conversation. I could be corrected on that but certainly Kingsford: They want a 1/4 mile wide berm to Johnson: Other than that I'll answer questions that you might have. Kingsford: Questions of Mr. Johnson? Thank you, anyone else? Come forward, state your name, address and be sworn please? Gary Forres, 843 Lilac, was sworn by the Attorney. Forres: My only question on it is I own the ground tot he north of the proposed subdivision and I have not, I don't know if this has changed but the original plat with the Planning and Zoning is this still the same as what was proposed? Kingsford: This is the property here that is being proposed. Forres: (Inaudible) We are getting almost landlocked unless I move the house and so forth, but without doing that without moving the house (inaudible). ~~ • s MEMORANDUM T0: MAYOR, COUNCIL, PLANNING & ZONING JULY 10, 1992 RE: THE LANDING SUBDIVISION N0. 2 (PRELIMINARY PLAT) FROM: GARY D. SMITH, P. E. „- • , I have reviewed this submittal and-have the following comments for your consideration as conditions of the applicant during the hearing process. 1. Some lots need to be reviewed for building area or lot size. a. Size: Lot 25 - Block 8; Lot 28 - Block 1; b. Building Area: Lot 20 - Block 7; Lat 70 - Block S; lot 9 - Hlack 13; Lot 56 - Block 5. 2. Hlock 5 is interrupted by Waltman Street therefore black numbers and lot numbers need to be revised. 3. A temporary turnaround needs to be shown at the west end of Waltman Street. Is Waltman Street to be considered a collector as our transportation plan states? If so, should right of ,way be 60 feet? 4. Fire hydrant and street light locations need to be moved a little.. The new locations will be forwarded to Johnson Engineering. ~. f~R~y and ali is~ri~rtiah fir! drai~F~1~ s ~ ~ , ,~'~}) h ., ^~~..- I br""~ : ' ~ab~ a °~'o ...:~.~._.~.,,..~. __~_, ~,,, structures 6. The 15' wide access between Lots 46/47 - Hlock 1 shall be an all-weather gravel surface, fenced on both sides. .' THE LANDING SUBDIVISION NO. 2 - PRELIMINARY PLAT 7. What is the water source -for the pressure irrigation system? 8. All street names shall be shown in accordance with the Ada County Street Name Committee.' 9. The secondary access to this subdivision continues to be a question that has not been answered. Providing stub roads is all well and good but, actual traffic flow does not take place until the roadways are built and connected. Terry Little @ ACRD said this subdivision cannot build out without the second access. The point where one access can satisfactorily serve must be established and no development should proceed beyond that without access Na. 2. 10. Similarly to the access question, water flow to this subdivision needs to be analyzed for domestic use and fire flow. It is expected that an additional tie to our water system will be necessary. --- - - -- ----- - Y~Eyyt012AV1 b uvh J"i~t_~n 10, 1~t4 Z -- ~`~~nY~'1~nJS__ ~~ u~n-ti-2 ions ll~~n...a-nnvi ,~ ~n~ ~-nnyy~ of 7~~ _._--~~~1d40v17'-gld1C~1Y~~. ~~_+pYL~2G~SS-_ _____ _ 1. SAw-t to~Fs need }o b~ --ev~ew~ad ~'ior b~~`(dl~.o, area or Id#- -- sire a, S12e ~ ~Of2S-,~l.ocltig~~d~28-~be~,( ; b_r3u~ ldino- Ada : loE ZO -,I~Luck 7 ; Hof?O-,5(ock ~ ; Lnl•5: Bleak (~o+- 56-13(.yck 5 . y~uv-nhevs o.ind 4ml-~q~I~~Yc I2io._d ~-bG~1/15~~.~.. _ --_ ____3,--/~ .={~w,govc~~--~ul!yArn,~d~ds ~1~e._s howh..~.~~e.---- - __ -_ _._..~5-1NQ11~1v~OLV.L 5~~- b2. ~0 vI.S1G!_el~G~. a c~ ~[2t-fav_ GS ~u~'_._. ---- -_ _~i-whs~OY~CVL~OIr~~~afcs_~_~0.,_.-~.hlveLd _rway - bc le~o ~' _ __. _. ~ ~ _~i~'~~.d-~t~d_ _Stke~.t . l y hi-_ ~_2.~~~ s_1~d_-fo_ b~t. __ : --------~rv,ove ~._.a~___Lt~de ..~tiu~u~r lccafinw.s will b~ ~r~~~_..._ -~'~is ~.bdlu~ioh .sHo1C be p~~td ,W- _h~a~kna! acs~ep~-re_ U6crs or Wrrat'n~Ctl'ning Ac~t~o~ _, wi~H Ckah-gut ~ruclul~s r • • 2~2 (~~he 15 ' w i cl2 acc¢s s b a fw cah I,o~s 4-L f 41- ES Loc17. ~ ho~ln ~tdgs. tq.S~Prrr- ~ ~4l( S'~Y3~'~ YL~W--LL$ ~~1 el ~~ b4. ~q dwln 1M ~{' ~tlYd Am CL. W 11'x. -I'I~l ~(Q COLLYI'~Til S~'Y~l1~' VIANVIe~ ~AIMw11'~'{"'~C.L ..~ ~~p bul 1'f' ~~0~-~-JL1N 2 Cr"~ d . L • ~ ~ r~~~ s a~i s c onl~erve vrtus~- be es~-a~rl~s h and n n ct~val o~ L53~.¢c~d ~l'I~a~- nh addifinylal 'he {Q ouy~ v s7sk~.vt ~nn`4~e n~c~ssaru. CERTIFICATE: I hereby certify that the following resolution is a true and exact copy from the Minutes of a meeting of the District's Board of Directors, held 2 October 1990, recorded at Book 56 Pages 187 and 196 through 202 (finalized 16 June 1992). Daren R. Coon Secretary of the Board NAMPA i MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT m M co M N WHEREAS, the various agencies which are authorized to issue land use change/site development permits have made it known that it is in the best interest of the public that this District amend rules and regulations for development within the boundaries of the District; and WHEREAS, it has been decided that such a cooperative and coordinating arrangement can best be realized through an amended permit system; and NHHRSAB, such requirements and requests have created a considerable expense burden to this District for which there is not available revenues; and WHHRSAS, a Development or Land Use Change policy was previously set up at a meeting of the District's Board of Directors held 17 March 1980, recorded at Book 36,. Pages 65 through 69, of the Minutes of the Board and recorded at Ada County as Instrument X8015309 and recorded at Canyon County as Instrument ,890100; and WHHRSAS, a Site Development policy was previously set up at a meeting of the District's Board of Directors held 17 March 1981, recorded at Book 37, Pages 89 through 92, of the Minutes of the Board and recorded at Ada County as Instrument X8115542 and recorded at Canyon County as Instrument ,919045; and WHEREAS, it has become necessary to combine and amend these policies. NOW T88RHFORH, BB IT RBSOLVBD, that the following amended policies are hereby established by this Board as District policy to take the place of the~revious policies. , o { g2y0022 r 0 _ 0 ~NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION CI~[hl;,l o E ~` aea c..JNTY.ID.FOR o a= _ ~~ ~ J. DAVID N„VaRR C `~~ 07 . i RECORDER U r--1 _ U .~ L BOO ~ _`p N _ ~ ~~ ~ a ~ _- '92 JUN la Pik 1 ~ ~, NAItPD i 1[HRIDI7IN IRRIGATION DISTRICT Hoard of Dirsators' Boliav for Chances of Land IIse er 8ite DYVe10DmeIIt Developments or land use changes or site developments which affect irrigation and/or drainage, within the boundaries of Nampa i Meridian irrigation District must be approved by the District Board of Directors. An application form may be obtained at the District office which will provide necessary preliminary information for District review. A. DRAINAGE: 1. There will be no acceptance of any increased flow in storm run-off, drainage, or any contaminated waters for which the District might be made liable by the Federal and/or State Clean Water Laws. 2. Existing or replacement of on-site drainage or run-off facilities ar modification thereto must be perpetually maintained by the site owner or owners. 3. Drainage plans prepared by a registered engineer may be required where deemed necessary by the District even though on-site modifications to the District drainage system are not required in the development, plans. 4. If a drainage lateral owned and maintained by the District courses the site, no alterations of the lateral nor encroachment or its right of way shall be permitted without a license agreement. No access to such drain shall be denied to the District. B. IRRIGATION i. The water rights of this District are not the same throughout the District. Neither are these always the same on one tract of land. Often these can be simplified without changing the Court confirmed status of the rights, if arrangements are made with the Secretary of the District in. the advance planning stages. 2. Any irrigation supply lateral or canal which is owned and operated by the District and which may course the site, must not be obstructed nor encroachment made on its rights of way. -1- 3. Any alteration from the original delivery point must be approved by the Water Superintendent and transfers to accomplish this alteration must be arranged with the Secretary of the District as part of the system plan acceptance by the Board of Directors. 4. No alteration or enclosure of an irrigation canal or lateral shall be permitted without a license agreement. No access to such canals or laterals shall be denied to the District. 5. If irrigation service is 'not to be provided to .the individual properties, all property owners must be notified that the District tax is an obligation of all lands in the Irrigation District. This notification is in compliance with Idaho Law. 6. No destruction, interference, nor limitation upon water flows which are appurtenant to the property rights of others shall be permitted. 7. If development plans include _providinq irrigation, operation and maintenance of the system may be undertaken by a Lateral Ditch Water User's Association, in which case the District assumes no responsibility beyond the original point of delivery for the tract. 8. The District cannot provide permission for alteration of waterways belonging to and being a part of the property rights of individual land owners and to which waters flow from the system of the District. Permission must be granted Prom each oP the property owners having ditch and water rights in the waterway. C. REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS 1. Applicant shall complete and submit the attached application form to the Secretary of the District. Two (2) copies of the proposed plans shall be submitted with the application. 2. Upon 'app`roval of the original application, plans and specifications for construction, prepared by a registered engineer, shall be submitted for review to the District. Plans and specifications shall be reviewed by the District water Superintendent and/or the District's engineers.' If acceptable, the developer will be notified. Prior to actual construction an estimate of the cost of construction shall be provided to the District. -2- 3. If a license agreement is required to conform to specifications of the District and/or recommendations of its engineers, the Secretary of the District will then make arrangements for an appropriate license agreement for which the licensee shall be liable for payment of attorney fees. 4. The District shall be notified prior to commencement of construction. Inspection by representatives of the District or its engineers will not constitute approval of all or any part of the system and shall in no way relieve the developer or his contractor of the responsibility for providing a sound, workable system. 5. Within ten (10) days after completion of construction the developer's engineer must certify to the District that the system was installed in accordance with plans and specifications, and furnish as-built drawings to the District. 6. The developer and/or his contractor shall be responsible for the repair of all defects, leaks or failures occurring in_ the installation for a period of three (3) years after completion of construction. A maintenance and warranty bond in the amount of 10$ of the estimated or actual construction cost, whichever is greater, shall - be furnished to the District within thirty""t30) days" after completion of construction. If the owner or his contractor fails to make required repairs or replacements promptly, the District shall make them, and the coat thereof shall be paid by the owner, his contractor or the surety. The fees required will be: 00 7. Attorney fees will be required only where a license agreement is required and these will be payable directly to the law firm of the District's attorney. and, BS IT FIIRTBER &ESOLVED, that the Secretary of the District is hereby ordered to send copies of this resolution to all planning and approval agencies in Ada and Canyon Counties and in the Cities of Boise, Meridian, and Nampa, to the County Commissioners of Ada and Canyon Counties.and to the Mayors of Boise, Meridian and Nampa to provide sufficient copies of the policy and application form for the continual administration and use thereof by all interested parties. -3- .. ~` STATE OF IDAHO as. County oP Canyon ) On this 16th day of June 1992, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public, in and for said State, personally appeared Darea 1t. Cooa, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. kz -•- i* ,,' Notary Public - State of Idaho ,p'tijOUgLtG,jOa Residing at Caldwell, Idaho ~~ •••a•••••a ~~~. My Commission Expires: 11/04/94 .~9r8 OF l~P~~. -4- NAMPA & NERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT (Reproduction of this form is not acceptable) GENERAL INFORMaTTON 1. (Proposed Name of Subdivision or Development) 2. (General Location) 3. (Legal Description - Attach if nacesaary) 4. (Owner of Record) (Address) 5. (Subdivider or Developer) (Address) `~ LAND USE CHANGE/SITE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - Page 1 of 2 6. (Engineer) (Address) (Person to contact) (Phone) 7. Acres ; No. of Lots S Number of Lots/Gross Acre 8. Proposed drainage discharge (Name of Drainage Lateral) 9. Is irrigation water to be provided to property? if yes, answer the following: a) Proposed delivery point (Canal or Lateral) b) Present delivery point for this land c) Type of system 1) Gravity (Piped or open ditches) 2) Pump pressure (Signature) (Date) (Application must ~e filed with the Secretary of the District. The appropriate fees and two (2) copies of all plats and drawings must be included with the application.) LAND USE CHANGE/SITE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - Page 2 of 2 :- - ~. MERIDIAN PLANNING 8 ZONING APRIL 14, 1992 PAGE 6 Hepper: Have you talked to Meridian School's about possible school sites? Turnbull: Yes twice. We did sometime ago when we were doing the first preliminary plat, which consisted of 90 lots. They didn't express any interest at that time. When we submitted the application for the second preliminary plat. again we approached the School District asking if they were interested in a school site in our property areas there and they declined. They felt it was not central with the area they wanted to locate. Hepper: Did you have any problems with the City Engineer's comments? Turnbull: No. The traffic study is underway now. Hr:° Ho you pYan =pi~m~ that. ~1ite+s? ,. Tµrn4ull: That' hadn't addrasatli t`4+ ihsr• is thv KQnnedyd~ . ~i 1. ~~ Hepper: This development is large enough to afford a partial development of a City Park. It doesn't appear that you have anything in here. Turnbull: No but we are willing to address that. Hepper: Do you have a comment on why the applicant couldn't go R-8 rather than R-4? Turnbull: Basically we've been going as you can see, if you take the first preliminary plat and the second preliminary plat as a total we have something in the order of 430 lots. We have done some larger lots in the current phase. We've been trying to maintaan that, but when we get down by the freeway and are impacted by problems that the freeway causes, it's just a matter of marketing. Chairman Johnson: I think what you'll run into there with the City's attitude is'to buffer that between the freeway with an R- 4. At this point we are discouraging an R-8 zone. Turnbull: You can see what we've done on Linder Road and I think it's done rather nicely. Addressed the buffer by the freeway (see tape) - OFFICIALS JACK NIEMANN, City Clark JANICE GABS. Trxaurar BRUCE D. STUART. WNM Works Supt. WAVNE D. CROOKBTON, JR., Atlomay EARL WARD, Weata Watsr SuOt. KENNY BOWERS, Fin Chat BILL GORDON, Pollq CNaf GARY SMITN, Ciry En0lnsar MEMORANDDM . HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY • A Good Play ro Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208-iB8-0433 FAX (7A8) 867-1813 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayan APRIL 10. 1992 TO: MAYOR, COQNCIL, PLANNING >t ZONING RE: THE LANDING N0.2 SIIBD]'PiSION Preliminazy Plat, Zo~/e Chaa ^~ FROM: Gazy Smith, PE py /"" COUNCILMEN RONALD R. TOLSMA ROBERT GIESLER MAX VERRINGTON IIOBERT D. CORRIE Ch WrnY~ wplpa a Rennlny JIM JONNSON I have reviewed this submit and have the following comments for your consideration as conditions of any actions you may take: 1. A traffic study needs to be done by the developers engineer to determine. the impact on Waltman Lane and its intersec- tion at Meridian Rd./East First St. 2. Who will be maintaining the storm drainage pond and pip- ing that exists outside the street right of way? 3. The size of the following lots needs review so as to meet the ordinance requirements: Lots 22-29, Block 6: Appear to be too small. Lots 3-15, Block 7: Appear to be too small. Lots 28,32 - Block 1: Appear to be too small. Lots 3-7 & 18, 19 - Block 8: Appear to be too small. Lots 2, 20-23, Block 9: Appear to be too small. 4. Is the 15 foot width of access to the flag lots adequate? 5. Is the irrigation easement on the Kennedy Lateral being fenced through by the lot owners or will it be left open? 6. What is the plan for piping of the Kennedy Lateral through Block 5? 7. Is this development large enough to support at least a partial development of a city park? 8. What is the water source for the pressure irrigation system? 9. A 10" diameter water line needs to be constructed in Waltman Lane from Meridian Road to and through this development when.the phasing of the development reaches Waltman Road extended. 10. The developer needs to analyze the existing sewage lift station for its capacity to serve the area of this development shown on the preliminary plat (347 lots). 11. A 12 foot wide all-weather gravel or asphalt access way needs to be constructed from Greenhead Dr. to the Ten Mile Creek ditch bank between Lots 40/41-Block 1 to provide city access to the sewage lift station. This access way needs to be fenced. r` ~~ ~' 9 I ,: ~' .I NVFi r r w` r`•:i io r^ i~ a q a W r I ~~-~F~ w r r_ ~` 1 ~ 1 1 I N / ~!~ i 1 ~ 3 g 1 1 1- 1 1~ ,, r `._ yr r ~ i ---T-_ T-_T• ~ N. C N r . R ~ C4 ~Y E ~ ~ i ~ i 1 1 1 1 Y.YII ~ / • A O l n~ 1 n 1 Y tl { n f F i 1 0° ,a 1 _ o N n ~ r ..n I 1 Itl 1 I I n R C 40 A ! E ~ ~~$ ~ i i i f s~ ~ ~R s .~ e _ I 1 I L L 1 I _ J 1 -- R j /1~9 S III, n ~ ~- • ~ ~ " ~ n a y{ ~A s ~ • ° Z ~~{ fb ~^4 1 ~ $ ~~ 1 ~ i ~~ S ~ ~~5 ~~~~Y [tl ~x:~ A ~ _ is _ "r -. rA _ , ! n IE °~ A 1 _ ~ A yja A ' ~. F ~ i0 = _ R~ - R R ' 1 °° - ' • d _~ _ ~ O ~ ~ ~ - w ~ ~ ~ v v l ~ ~1~ - _ ! F~ -~ I R - 33 ~ - • ! R - _ Q $ " ' .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ,. .. .. .. ,. .. .. _ ~' ' ~ 9 C t 7~ i ' y.' A A Art .TS_ ° _ ~ @e y w R~! ~ - _ ' i ~ e " ' 1 . $ ~ - ~ ' R 1 ~ Q " a Fy--I ~ F A ~ ~ 2 A " - ~ .. 1 ~-1 ~i b n II R ~ " ~ ~! A °I. A ~ ~~ r - ! F R r ~ R y a ' n. O,r = R R 1 • 6 R •~ II' a~ •; 2~ ; 9~ R O g R i~ R ! s r; ,.......... ~ ..- ~..•....e ...... em e{ ---. 72u~r~r~ia ~c 71Z~en;u~iaat ~Ifini~utt4st Du2>~u.'Ct 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA,IDAH083651-x395 FAX # 208-888-6201 Gary Smith City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phones: Area Code 208 - OfFICE: Nampa 466-7661 MAR 0 6 1995 Boise 343-1884 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 MERIDIAN Boise 3a5-2431 an ENGRJEER Re: The Landinq No. 7 Subdivision/Kennedy Lateral Piping Proposal Dear Gary: I am writing this letter in regard to our telephone conversation of 27 February 1995 and to clarify my 7 February 1995 letter to Mr. Tucker Johnson. The flows for the Kennedy Lateral that were provided the engineer were based on a year in which Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District could provide a full one inch per acre to every delivery. A margin of approximately 15 per cent for evaporation water was included. These calculations were used to obtain the size of the pipe in case that we ever have need to deliver this amount of water. However, with the urbanization within the area, the odds of the District ever running maximum flows are slim. Even with the known surface run-off upstream from The Landing No. 7 Subdivision, I do not believe that the District would have a problem with the ditch over flowing during a rain storm. Therefore, in order to clarify what I had written prior to this, I believe that a 48 inch pipe is adequate and I believe that it will work quite well. If the pipe line is installed according to approved plans, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District will assume responsibility for the operation and maintenance. If further discussion is required, feel free to contact me. Since ely, ~~.~_. ohn P. Anderson District Water Superintendent pc: Each Director Secretary of the Board Tucker Johnson, Skyline Development Bill Henson Rider 5 APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES F i 1 e RNER FLOW RIGHTS 23,000 BOISE PROTECT RIGHTS - 40,000 1 March 1995 ~2a~~ & 7~ ' z ~vugatia~ ?~ut>4iic~ 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 206-888-6201 19 September 1995 RECE/VED ~ Afe°c«k2oe Gary Smith, City Engineer OFFICE: Nampa Boise 466-7861 343-1884 City of Meridian _._ ~ ~ q~ ~n ~.r ~- ,. U •- SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 33 East Idaho Street Mi=R~IAN Bosse 34s-2431 Meridian, ID 83642 CtT•s ~~~,~ RE: Variance. Request for Waterbury No. 5 Subdivision Dear Gary: Bruce (from your office) sent me a report generated by Hrian Smith of Hubble Engineering titled-"Calculations for Piping Creason Lateral for Waterbury No. 5 Subdivision" Project X94-034-00. I reviewed the report and responded 1 September 1995. The information that I reviewed included storm water calculations and what I believe to be a demonstration on how the engineers for this project perceive Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District's system is ogerated. I would like to outline for you Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District's operation of the Creason Lateral. The Creason Lateral is measured downstream from the head works structure which is located at the confluence of the Finch Lateral and the Creason Feeder. The Creason Feeder carries water from the Fivemile Drain. When the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District wants to divert water into the Creason Lateral from the Fivemile Drain, we have a check structure located downstream and to the west of the Creason Feeder. This cheek structure must-have boards placed in it to divert the water as the water is forced into the Creason Feeder. In a storm of the magnitude of the one that is being used in the demonstration by Brian Smith, I can assure you that these boards would be removed and, therefore, no water would be forced into the feeder. One of the potential water sources that was mentioned by Brian Smith was the Flack Drain. I do not believe that I even want to address the Flack Drain as the amount of water that comes into the Creason Lateral from the Flack Drain is insignificant. This fs based on several years of operational experience. Page 1 of 2 P 4-19-9 APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RRiHiS - 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS -40,000 ( ~ ~~~ ~~~ 19 September 1995 Gary Smith Page Z of 2 The last water source for the Creason Lateral is the Finch Lateral which is a controlled facility. The Finch Lateral's main water source is the Ridenbaugh Canal-located off Maple Grove Road just north of Franklin Road in Boise. The Finch Lateral does generate some additional surface water but, in the case of a-storm of great magnitude,. the Creason Lateral has a check structure just below the confluence of the Creason Feeder and Finch Lateral in which boards can be placed. When this check structure is activated it pushes the water directly down the Creason Feeder into the Fivemile Drain, thus regulating the flow into the Creason Lateral. 2 do not believe water can even reach the Creason Lateral in the magnitude discussed in this report. The Finch Lateral had a syphon placed in it for a road crossing west of this vicinity. This syphon is approximately 48 inches in diameter and the size was based on flow calculations provided by Hubble Engineering. In summary, Nampa & Meridian~Irrigation District has owned and operated these facilities for well over 100 years. We have a current staff that is very dedicated and they are capable of dealing with a variety of situations including rain storms during water delivery season. I do not believe that this important fact was given any consideration when the report was prepared. The total issue happens to be, "Is it possible to operate and maintain H~ the Creason Lateral in the vicinity of Waterbury No. 5 Subdivisions with a 48 inch pipe and will the pipe run 2,000 inches?" In the ~ brief discussion that I had this morning with the Districts engineer, John Sharp, he agreed that a 48 inch pipe should be more than adequate to handle the flow of the Creason Lateral. I believe that a 48 inch pipe would be more than adequate and that it should work quite well. If the pipeline is installed according ~~Ayi to approved plans, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District will assume all responsibility for the operation and maintenance. Sincerely, J/~P~~ S Water Superintendent JPA/dnm cc: File ~• Each Director Secretary of the Board Dan Steenson John Sharp Brian Smith, Hubble Engineering Rider #4 ~AIl47oM La{ev..l W s btr I ~w.t1n ~IUQ qo c{s (S+• SI+N~M CYtG SOM ~. pa.u~ 3?= c+. e~~{ r„ W, s. F~ wc4 ~ _'_ _ C~etln. ~. w.s.- 13'-" G' ~o y~. ~twA CENTRAL • • DISTRICT ~ HEALTH D E?ARTMENT h1AIN OFFICE• 1455 N. ORCHARC• BOISE, IDAHO 83706•(208) 375-5211 93-779 February 5, 1993 DAVID NAVARRO ADA COUNTY RECORDER 650 MAIN STREET BOISE ID 83702 RE: THE LANDING NO. 4 SUBDIVISION Dear Mr. Navarro: Central District Health Department, Environmental Health Division has reviewed and can approve the final plat on this subdivision for central water and central sewer facilities. Final approval was given on February 5, 1993. No lot size may be reduced without prior approval of the health authority. If you have any questions please call. Sincerely, Thomas E. Schmalz, E.H.S. Senior Environmental Health Specialist cc: Tom Turco, Director pity oP Mertdi~all" City of Meridian Building Dept. HUD Roy Johnson Brighton Corp. TS:ch Serving Ada, Boise, Elmore, and Valley Counties Ada I Bolae County Otfke Elmore County OHlea Elmore County OHlee Valley County OHlce 1655 N. Orchard S[ 520 E. 8th Streat N. of Envlronmemal Health P.O. Box 7448 Boise, ID. 83706 Mountain Home, ID. 190 S. dtlt SVeel E McCall, 10.83638 Nursing:37S5211 63667 Ph. 5874407 Mountain Home, ID. Ph. 634-1194 Environmemal 83647 Ph.561-9225 Health: 3755230 r • (~ ~ ~ INTER-DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE JAMES E. BRUCE, President GLENN J. RHODES, Vlce President LANDING4. FP/DSTECH CHARLES L. WINDER, Secretary 1-13-93 TO: ACRD Commission DATE: January 11, 1993 FROM: Development Services SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT -THE LANDING SUBDIVISION #4 FACTS & FINDINGS: 1. The Landing #4 is 27-lot first phase of a 299-lot single family residen- tial subdivision located east of Linder Road south of Franklin Road. The numbering sequence (apparently to be continued) comes from a completed 93-lot subdivision originally approved as Mallard Landing. • 2. All conditions of the preliminary plat have been satisfied. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve the final plat of The Landing Subdivision #4 and authorize the Chairman to endorse. STAFF SUBMITTING: Larry Sale DATE OF COMMISSION APPROVAL: JAN 3 ?993 w..,.r+.D. -ENG. ada county highway district 318 East 37th • Boise, Idaho 83714 • Phone (208) 345-7680 .' i i E k Z! ,~ .e. s~®~I ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ 8; z ~ ~ z~ R 0 ~ ~ 1 F A~~ ~ ~//~~ Vf V -~ ~ ` ~ b N ~ ~ gggggg 3 0 j ~~ ~~ ~ wb' ~ ,~e;',rc ~~ .. _ ~` .e ~O 9- lp Y"~_ w w R N m ~~ ~ u az'~~R~ ~ 3 3~l~~R R >> 'Sy4 R Rid ~R ~ .9 ~ R t W S ~~~~-Ea=E~- e''eti~~ a w `- 3 ~ 1 ~..~ -S ~i s. unoeR Rob ~ 4~~.~ ~ ~~:;~~~ i y+ [, O~j .~.~ 0 3 ~~ i~ ~i :; e` ~~~ ~ a x al = 1 i i 1 1 s i i x l e a csteaxq ux4 xrtxs*~n: xx. e. ..<A,..., ~... ........~..~ _. ~ ~ na ~ v ~ ~ •~ ., ~ ~ a*~a'' .~ a , , Tf- '~..- F ~ -.y , I E a n ~ ^N -T 'T' 1,~~^ ~`~c - ), - i a ~- `• ~ g ~ ~ 9 RiAaM a4aa I)1 S „ r " I ~ x' ' !~ ~!!~ i ~ i ~ ~+, ~ ~ ~ 999898999 ' ., ...~. "' F .. - i __ry___~-__~___~__-~__~__- n P A J. 1 4~ x ~; '" ' IA I a x, a i ~~ W ? t ^ 1 8 v ! ~ x li?Y • •j ~~' I4I 1 ~I v . a rwg~ ~f ~ ~ a I ~ i • ! A ~ +x/ w ! ~~ A~ x _ x . ~i t~~6rE~~~~~9E ,aa - t, ..... ,_R i 4 a Ia 1 _ iA .I p r{ 9 ~ ~ i i) ~ •I a .A i ? •i ^ - _ __ ^ ~ .1 - ~- ~a X6 a .'f.~~1 ~I~ it ,. .a .7 1 T ~ i' w arm f ~..aaea a - ' 1 ! ' ~ ~~jj ~ .~ A I ~1 .a / a ~-s c a ~ _ a i"~ b ', I I •4 x a t : ^? 4 ~- a aI s .. I A s ~ .. ? 4 . ! 4 ." - _ _ ? .A ?- A A A A ~ ? A _ A _ a ._~ ~? ^' ~1 ~?•~?~ h x x _ ar 1 1! 1 . R x ,~ ,. a MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 6 1992 The Regular Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order by Mayor Grant P. Kingsford at 7:30 P. M.: Members Present: Ron Tolsma, Bob Giesler, Max Yerrington, Hob Corrie: Others Present: Michael Swenson, Ron Scott, Don Bryan, Frank Thomason, Claudia Engle, Sue Peckham, Kathe' Mitchell, Davis Trumbull, Gary Hanners, Marla Hanners, Greg Walker, Wayne Forrey, Dave Turnbull, Jim Merkle, Jim Johnson, Bill Gordon, Gary Smith, Wayne Crookston, Linda Paddock, Pat Dobie, MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 15, 1992: The Motion was made by Tolsma and seconded by Yerrington to approve the minutes of the previous meeting held September 15, 1992 as written: Motion Carried: All Yea: Kingsford: Wishes Ron Tolsma a Happy Birthday. ITEM 4t1: PRELIMINARY PLAT ON THE LANDING SUBDIVISION, TABLED AT PRIOR MEETING: Kingsford: Maybe Mr. Giesler could update the Council on his Findings. Giesler: We met with the necessary individuals regarding this and we had asked that our concerns be answered about the intersection of Franklin and Linder Road. The four way stop will be in by the end of this week. We also had some concerns that the amount of traffic that could be building up on Franklin Road because of the four way stop, so we asked that their Engineer do a study on that to see what the time frame would be that a person would have to wait at that stop sign during peak hours. We did get this study. Kingsford: I did speak with the Engineer about this. Eng. Smith: I did talk with Terry Little at ACHD and he said that they had gone through the calculations that were submitted and that everything checked out as far as the calculations were concerned. The original recommendation by the Highway District was that no more than 200 additional lots beyond the point of Pintail and Canvasback be developed until construction of another street be completed to either Meridian or Franklin Road. Of course if the construction is out to Linder then that would put OCT~°~R S, 19Rc PACs[ the additiona'_ car; back onto Linder ar,d to Franklin and at that tame Ter-y Lit''lA indicated that addi`ior;al st;_,dy wo~.iid need tc be made concerning a signa'_ at that intersection. ?he ene thing that did ctice f;^am the study thy.,+. Pat did acs the time of delay at the intersection calc::la*_ed to be 19.. seconds per vehicle whic'? according to the standards placed it in a level of servi__ of _ _=vet of service "C" ._ ;~-°? seconds average stc_ delay is e.n average traffic delay. In my mind the level of service "C" is tieing stretched to alre=_t the end on this cal.~ulated de'_ay, but all that aside the Highway District did accept this report for this rote:°section as a four way stet. Kingsford: „ne ^_f *he concerns t`:at I had when Gary was going over this with me ar.d talked about those ^_00 lots in that area being a maximur. load un+. i'_ you have anot'ner entrance either onto L.nd,-rr or Franklin. '_n ye~_,r futare projections did tha_ take into account say the southwest .ratersection of Franklin and __nder, the northwest quadrant ar,r_ the small area on the northeast. Pat Dobie: Mr. Mayor those fcture traffic projections were weed upon a multiple of the existing traffic f'_ows. They we,^s^•` site specific. The Ada Planning Association has projected ^_ertain growth in t:°affic volume over the next twenty years i- thi. sect~_on of the community. What I did there and what _~ c,.temar-~ in these type o° t;°affic st_:dies is to p•-cject the future ~raffi~ based upor, a multiple of the existing traff~c using tho,o nu;nber^~ the.t APA has developed. i ran that cut for eight years, to _he year X200, added that onto the exis~ing `r~ffic vol•_rmes and then added to that *_he traffic that would ,°es,lt from the develoGm?rat cf two hundred lots in the Landing Subdivision. Tolsma: It says "that the traffic study prepared by Bell-Wa'.;~er Cngi^E,e.-s be eviewed by R^~~^ and the s+.~_:dy cor.c:uded "at nc conge_tian p*^oblers .could exist at __nder and Franklin Road intersection after the cor,ner_tior. to Waltman Lane was conpleted" _ Wci •- ~_rnder th2 a`_s'.:m pt i..^ Mat tJ"'.ey wa5n~t ~0:.^. ;^y tD ~":~O!< t.^. Wal._ an. -~,ne. _.e:•k ^.'_emann. That's th_ old study. ^c``•_-_ :- _he ~revio_~s =....dy that Baas d...a, what Fe__--'Ja:'_':or a^.'i.+ w~'~ 3 °'t'_.._ tl Rffi._ =Gndit '__~ wt-~, .-e a^. i.,xt e'15 .^~ .-~ -~-- _.. c,>.ro `c t''- -~. _ -'- t` ~ ---_ no =. •.' via Wa'_t::an _„__. ~!o.; MERIDIRN CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 6, 1992 PAGE 4 year plan, although it's currently neither budgeted nor scheduled. It has been identified as a high priority project. What your Engineer has suggested is probably a very good course of action and that's to encourage the Highway District to get a date and to get a budget figure tacked onto that project. Maybe that work could be done and those facilities could be available before the traffic from these subdivisions materialize. Kingsford: Didn't the Highway District come up with a computer modeling for the whole County, a traffic flow that they are supposed to keep updating? Dobie: There's a model that's been maintained by ITD and by APA that's been in existence for over a decade. I don't think that it's been updated recently. Explanation further. Giesler: Mr. Dobie on a 20 second delay, what does that consider is it like three cars sitting at the sign or waiting? Dobie: It would be about six vehicles. Kingsford: For the Council's information, we did receive a letter on September 15th from Gary Fors with regard to an agreement that was apparently struck between Mr. Ted Johnson himself on an earlier phase that both parties agreed to a-fence between the properties that has not been accomplished. Dave Turnbull: If that's so we would be happy to build the fence. The Motion was made by Giesler and seconded by Tolsma to approve the preliminary plat on the Landing Subdivision #3. Motion Carried: All Yea: ITEM #2: FINRL PLAT ON LANDING SUBDIVISION, PHASE 4 8 5: TABLED AT PRIOR MEETING: Kingsford: Has the developer looked into the issue of the landlocked parcel? Property being referenced was explained to Mr. Turnbull. Discussion Held. (See tape) FINAL PLAT THE LANDING PHASE # 4 COMMENT S 1: AC[-ID: NO CONY~S]TS RECEIVID: 2: CENTRAL DISTRICT' HEALTH: CAN APPROJE WITH CENTRAL FTFITER & SEWER: 3: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SEE ATTACHED: 4: SCHOOL DISTRICT: SEE LETTER ATTACHED: 5: CITY ENGINEER: SEE ATTACHED CCNP'gSTPS: 6: FIRE DEPT: NO O&TECPIONS: 7: POLICE DEPT: NO OBJECPIONS: '' 8: STREET NAME CCY~P7ITTEE: SEE ATTACHED: ~ IHI lolm~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~ qo~r od z ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ W M H H H nF' r. oy ~ ro O ~ ~ K ~~i ? 8 3~ N~~ y ~ H Zg 3 UJ H ~ro~1 O y RHH1 f] 3 9~ hid y ~ H Z Z 3 y • r ~ H ~ ro ~ ~~ ~' c y~ H y t" IA ty ny V ~ H r ~~~y ~ r ~ H N H ~ `-' [~J H H ~p j? `s d d N K D"' o.S S ~ ~ O c ~~$~T ~~~~~ ~~a~m ~~~~~ m ry Z'~~ ~Fq~ ~r ~ IyH I I ~~ N ~C+. AG~ O~ yx~7 N N 3O ~G ~ ~ n ~ O L~J ~ G] ~ t" ~ 3 ~ U~ C' 3 ~ ~ ~r o H~ H o o~ ro ~' m~ 4 ~~~~~~"~~~~~ yy~~ y ~ Z ~ ~ ~~ r, c ~, C~ h n r 3 H ~ r yy [il C O N ~ ~ ~ H r ~ N ~ ~ N ~ N y~ R] H y (Q~]~[Wx7~~ 5 "yy ~r ~H ~~ y d ttf 0 H ',q :E '9 b n ~ ~ ~ H r ro ~~yy r O H Hy~ Z N w w to Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District's Kennedy Lateral courses along the proj- ect's south boundary. The right-of-way of the Kennedy Lateral is 55 feet; 20 feet to the left and 35 feet to the right from center facing downstream. See Idaho Code 42-1208--RIGHTS-OF-WAY NOT SUBJECT TO ADVERSE POSSESSION. The developer must contact John P. Anderson or Bill Henson at Nampa 6 Meridian Irrigation District, 466-0663 or 345-2431, for approval before any encroach- ment or change of right-of-way occurs. All laterals and waste ways must be protected. Municipal surface drainage must be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District must review drainage plans. Developer must comply with Idaho Code 31-3805. Bill Henson, Foreman Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District • . SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Dr. Nick Hallett DEPUTY SUPERINTEN DENT Dan Mabe, Finance & Administration ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT Bob Haley, Instruction & Personnel DIRECTORS Jim Carberry, Secondary Darlene Fulwood, Elementary Doug Rutan, Special Services JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.2 911 MERI DIAN STREET MERI DIAN,IDAH083642 • PHONE(208~888-6701 August 27, 1992 Meridian City Council 33 E. Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: The Landing #4 Dear Councilmen: I have reviewed the preliminary plans for The Landing #4 Subdivision. This planned development will accelerate the need for Joint School District No. 2 to construct additional classrooms and/or to adjust school attendance boundaries. Meridian Schools do not have excess capacity. Nearly every school in the district is beyond capacity. The Meridian School District supports economic growth for Idaho and specifically the district's area, but such growth produces a need for additional school construction. We ask your support for a development fee statute on new home construction. We ask your support for a development fee statute on new home construction or a real estate transfer fee to help offset the costs of building additional school facilities. If this support is lacking then we ask that additional residential development be denied. Residents of the new subdivision cannot be assured of attending the neighborhood school as it may be necessary to bus students to available classrooms across the district. We ask that you assure the developer will provide walkways, bike paths and safe pedestrian access. Sincerely, !~7 ~NNa~' Dan Mabe, Deputy Superintendent DM:gr ~~ MEMORANDUM September 10, 1992 T0: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL FROM: GRRY D. SMITH, P.E. ~4p~,7~~ RE: THE LANDING SUBDIVISION N0. 4 (FINAL PLAT> I have reviewed this submittal and have the following comments for your consideration during the hearing process as conditions of the applicant: 1. Execute the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying Acknowledgement. 2. Supply a statement of conformance with the approved preliminary plat and meeting all requirements or conditions thereof. 3. Supply a statement of conformance with acceptable engineering, architectural and surveying practices and local standards. 4. Add the wording "Plat Showing" to the title across the top of the plat map. 5. Change street name "Sniper Way" to "South Canvasback Way". Add to the plat map "West Pintail Street", and "West Loon Street", all as per subdivision evaluation letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee dated August 27, 1992. 6. Add Block 6 to Lot 1 at the northeast corner of S. Pelican Way and W. Pintail Street. 7. Change the southerly dimensions of Lots 20-23, Block 5 so they match or add up to the dimensions shown on the exterior boundary of the subdivision. Indicate the bearing of the 10.58' leg of Lot 2, Hlock 8. Show the distance of the east side of Lot 30, Block 1, and the distance of the north side of Lot 31, Block 1. 8. Relocate "Unplatted" note on east side to the north adjacent to Block 7. 9. The second curve noted in the legal description of the Certificate of Owners is labeled as a curve to the left, it should read a curve to the right. SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET Proposed Development Name _THE LANDING SUB 4 City .MERIDIAN Date Reviewed 08/27/92 Preliminary Stage Final XXXXXX Engineer/Developer Johnson Ener./Skvline Corp Date Sent The following SUBDIVISION NAME is approved by the Ada County Engineer or his designee per the requirements of the IDAHO STATE CODE. TNE LANDING SUBDIVT rON NO 4 X Date _The Street name comments listed 6e1ow are made by the members of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this development in accordance with the Boise City Street Name Ordinance. The street shown on the olat as "SNZP~'R WAY" sha71 be named "SOUTH CANVASBACK WAY" The following new street name is aooroved d shall aonear on the o at as• "SOUTH PELICAN WAY" Please show the street names for the 2 new east/west streets on the plat as• "W. ST FET" The above street name comments have been read and approved bq the following agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the .signatures must 6e secured 6y the representative or his designee in order for the street names to be officially approved. ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE Ada County Engineer John Priestez Ada Planning Assoc. Terri Raynor t DESIGNEES Date Date Meridian Fire Dept. Representative Date NOTE: A copy of this evaluation sheet moat be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed 1111 Sub Index Street Index Map NNMBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS cn-... r REVIEW SHEET Rezone # Conditional Plat Return to: ^ Boise ^ Eagle ^ Garden City ®-Meridian ^ Kuna ^ Acz ^ 1. We have no objections to this proposal. ^ 2. We recommend denial of this proposal. ^ 3. Spec'rfic knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this proposal. ^ 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this proposal before we can comment. ^ 5. Before we can comment concerning individual sewge disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of ^ high seasonal ground water ^ solid lava from original grade ^ 6. W ~ n approve this proposal for individual sewage disposal to be located above solid lava layers: 2 feet 4 feet 7. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: Central sewage ^ Community sewage system^ Community water well ^ Interim sewage ~, Central water ^ Individual sewage ^ Individual water 8. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality: Central sewage Community sewage system^ Community water Sewage dry lines ~ Central water 9. Street runoff is not to create a mosquito breeding probeim. ^ 10. This department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. ^ 11. Ii restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. ^ 12. We will require plans be submitted for a plan reiew for any: ^ Food establishment ^ Swimming pools or spas ^ Child Care Center ^ Beverage establishment ^ Grocery store ^ 13. DATE: ,~~,~ ~~~ Reviewed by: %~, ~~ cot•o Last TEa, CENTRAL •• DISTRICT S~THEALTI~ DEPARTMENT O r y 9 ~ FC [+7 H ,b~ Z N r m ~ d H O Gv N K N m T T i T T I I I~ S' i~j M I~~j H '°~ z ~ ~ d r ~ z~ ~z ~~,,pp 2 Cr" _ O O ^,;,pH ~ M 9 Z MN M H ~ ly~ K7 fpAy (/ ~ C', H pp v ro ~ 3 ~ N M O d ~ ~ ~ ~ t~~ tq'~ ~ ~ fC ~ Hn r c H -~ ~~ ~ 3 t~p y zoN ~ ~ N ~ U1 H nM y Y ~ „ 3 yN E' ~ z A v y y ~ '7 yY T~ ~ 3 a+ ~ ro y r Y HY y g w a' N 3 r H7 ~ ~ ~ E e ~, ~ ~ H ~ O Z ~ `" oo ~J ~ v a+ ~yqM C" H ~bg p ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~~ 4b ~, ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ y~ T~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ aJ ~~ ~~ ~~ Iyy~ fC b I H 1 V N I N O t+ n RJ ~~p H I~ i~~+~ i M ~~ H lTJ i H M IN IA 3 ro A r N r N IM ~ I4 S b~ 3 L" M M yy~ Lii C L] C H N ,4i N N ny~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o .. N ~~ ~~ ~~" ~ ~~~ ~~ NH~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ y r ~~~~~ ~~ ~y ~ ~~ ~ K ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~~ ~ o ~$ ~o W py N n i H N I I I I I ( n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7D 5~ ~ ~ ~ tom" ~ ~ ~ tl~o ~ ~ ~53q ~ 3 yO H C H b~ r NO ~ q 3~ tdil ~ y ~ O 7C 'L ~n y t" 4 r~ ~~f~ ~~~2~~~ ~~~~t~1~~~~~~~ y~~ A Z r ~ rdi ~ ~S ~ . ~ ~ H trJ N ~~~ro8y~~ ~~o 08~~~~~f3~~~ ~ z 3 w r°. ~ ~ H vi f~~ 3 O ro R+ 3 H O~ Z H ~ C1 y ~ ~ ~ H ~ ~ C7 ~~y Iq-] N E ~ 3~ z y H .!7.rJ 3 LT] ~ ro Try R~ C~ N y rro W q r ~ O ~ ro y " ~ ~ H ~ .e v ~ r o ~ H to N m ~ ~ r q ~ ~ H r l0 N ~ iP N .. ~ lD N d H H .T. K yby RJ y ~~ oo M M'A rC w H y yO O q H b Cs] H 0 N J H K M [bJ O r a a Q~ Z H z r ro r Gl yNy ~C r W W M q ~ gK <W [+1 H M C G1 K •• H Q r K N ~ b d N N i ~] M z K ~"~ y ... M z 8 r 3 i N '~. ~~r 3 M O 3 M H K ... 's7 N ~~+ 7 H V R+ y~~ Er" 7 H K I d H o~ 2 yM H IIII b ~~~ A~ H nail ~~3 ~ b A iII O y '~+C Z ~ ~1 3 n m a n a N 6 O v c v J A 0 z v Z fL rt w ~ ~ n in N PI ~ C iv o D m o a V O ~ m `~ 00 -s ~ N ~~ rN m a N m m 3 ~•~• w J 0 c+ J O ~+ a G V. w m ('f rr 0 w i 0 a n a '•h 1 N H nn~ t~ m m a N a a ro z 3 fD O 1 °o ~•r f oa m v c o- c ~• Vl M ~~+ 7 H .-. 1111111 b ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ W ~ 3 ~ ~ F y ~ Q C Z ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ b ~ 41 ~ -23: 5 H - f ~+ N G ~ C t~ C ^ YI ~"' C In ~ H r ~ N ~ ~ • N r N ~~~ n `~ H ~~~ • r H y zO O y !!7®~~ K W ~~ M ~+7 ~~i2 A ~ (.. Y. Y ti b 7 C I V1 W ~ ' N N i IN I -~ I~ i I~ ~I I I IN I I I I~ I I I I~ I I i l l l l y ~ r b~ r~ o d~ r K~~~~ H n ~ m r~~ 4 r ~ ~ zz7y ~ ~ v 'y~p~7 ~ ~ ~y°p m [~~ ~ ~ ~rn°n ~ H ro ~" ~ (~~ N [~ ~ ~ H G] .T.. C/1 ~ ~ Kl ~ N LsJ ~ 1t~~ ~ ~ Z Z ~'] N H ~ "~ r i-i AA~ ~ ~ro7 z ~ K n ~ e~ 0 3 N O y ~ p M y n~ 3 ~ 4 {'~~07 lt+ 3 H z ~ Z y ~ y 3 ~ ~ y y a ~ :~ ~~ q CC a~ ro ~+ h7 q N y C+ pp y ~~~~~+~~ ~~ N g v K ~ H v ~ o ~ ~ r K k K 8 "' ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ H m io t~ ~ ~ .. N ~ ~ C G~ r O ~ ~ H r lD N l0 as N .. ~ N d 0 H 0 m H K t., j "_~ .;r :_ ~y ~~~p ~~ U~ W y K ~~ E rr H O ~~ y m b b7 0 ~~ m N 8~ H nyJ 'D x c~ ~p 'Z ~7 H z r ro r H I~ 0 r W W m 5~ CERTIFICATE: I hereby certify that the following resolution is a true .and exact copy from the Minutes of a meeting of the District's Board of Directors, held 2 October 1990, recorded at Book 56 Pages 187 and 196 through 202 (finalized 16 June 1992). Daren R. Coon Secretary of the Board NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT 1188R8A8, the various agencies which are authorized to issue land use change/site development permits have made it known that it is in the bast interest of the public that this District amend rules and regulations for development within the boundaries of the District; and 1fHSR8718, it has been decided that such a cooperative and coordinating arrangement can best be realized through an amended permit system; and. 11S8R8A8, such requirements and requests have created a considerable expense burden to this District for which there is not available revenues; and 118888718, a Development or Land Use Change policy was previously set up at a meeting of the District's Board of Directors held 17 March 1980, recorded at Book 36, Pages 65 through 69, of the Minutes of the Board and recorded at Ada County as Instrument #8015309 and recorded at Canyon County as Instrument ,890100; and 1188R8A8, a Site Development policy was previously set up at a meeting of the District's Board of Directors held 17 March 1981, recorded at Book 37, Pages 89 through 92, of the Minutes of the Board and recorded at Ada County as Instrument #`8115542 and recorded at Canyon County as Instrument X919045; and 118888718, it has become necessary to combine and amend these policies. NOA TH8R8FOR8, BS IT R88OLV8D, that the following amended policies are hereby established by this Board as District policy to take the place of the~revioua policies. m M C~ c~ w ° ~-+ cc N o m w .--i o ~ ~ o ~ .~ U ~~ ~ ~' ~J m _6y -~ N O'7 ,~ ;r ;~ z z ~~ °`v z Q r vi ~ g2yQ022 ~NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DlSfkltil AEA GC.'JNTY.1 D. F®R _- J. DAVID NA'.'ARR , REC©RDER '92 JUN 13 Pik 1 w 2 _ :_._ ~ • Developments or land use changes or site developments which affect irrigation and/or drainage, within the boundaries of Nampa & Meridian irrigation District must be approved by the District Board of Directors. An application form may be obtained at the District office which will provide necessary preliminary information for District review. A. DRAINAGE: 1. There will be no acceptance of any increased flow in storm run-off, drainage, or any contaminated waters for which the District might be made liable by the Federal and/or State Clean Water Laws. 2. Existing or replacement of on-site drainage or run-off facilities or modification thereto must be perpetually maintained by the site owner or owners. 3. Drainage plans prepared by a registered engineer may be required where deemed necessary by the District even though on-site modifications to the District drainage system are not required in the development plans. If a drainage lateral owned and maintained by the District courses the site, no alterations of the lateral nor encroachment or its right of way shall be permitted without a license agreement. No access to such drain shall be denied to the District. B. IRRIGATION i. The water rights of this District are not the same throughout the District. Neither are these always the same on one tract of land. Oftsn these can be simplified without changing the Court confirmed status of the rights, if arrangements are made with the Secretary of the District in the advance planning stages. 2. Any irrigation supply lateral or canal which is owned and operated by the District and which may course the site, must not be obstructed nor .encroachment made on its rights of way. -1- NAriP71 i riBRIDII-N IRRI6]1TI011 DISTRICT f p ~ ~ 3. Any alteration from the original delivery point must be approved by the Water Superintendent and transfers to accomplish this alteration must be arranged with the Secretary of the District as part of the system plan acceptance by the Board of Directors. 4. No alteration or enclosure of an irrigation canal or lateral shall be permitted without a license agreement... No access to such canals or laterals shall be denied to the District. 5. Zf irrigation service is not to be provided to the individual properties, all property owners must be notified that the District tax is an obligation of all lands in the Irrigation District. This notification is in compliance with Idaho Law. 6. No destruction, interference, nor limitation upon water flows which are appurtenant to the .property rights of others shall be permitted. 7. If development plans include providing irrigation, operation and maintenance of the system may be undertaken by a Lateral Ditch Water User's Association, in which case the District assumes no responsibility beyond the original point of delivery for the tract. 8. The District cannot provide permission for alteration of waterways belonging to and being a part of the property rights of individual: landowners and to which waters flow from the system of the District. Permission must be granted from each of the property owners having ditch and water rights in the waterway. C. REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS 1. Applicant shall complete and submit the attached application form to the Secretary of the District. Two (2) copies of the proposed plans shall be submitted with the application. 2. Upon approval of the original application, plans and specifications for construction, prepared by a registered engineer, shall be submitted for review to the District. Plans and specifications shall be reviewed by the District Water Superintendent and/or the District's engineers. If .acceptable, the developer will be notified. Prior to actual construction an estimate of the cost of construction shall be provided to the District. -2- 3. if a license agreement is required to conform to specifications of the District and/or recommendations of its engineers, the Secretary of the District will then make arrangements for an appropriate license agreement for which the licensee shall be lfabls for payment of attorney fees. 4. The District shall be notified prior to commencement of construction. Inspection by representatives of the District or its engineers will not constitute approval of all or any part of the system and shall in no way relieve the developer or his contractor of the responsibility for providing a sound, workable system. 5. Within ten (30) days after completion of construction the developer's engineer must certify to the District that the system was installed in accordance with plans and specifications, and .furnish as-built drawings to the District. 6. The developer and/or his contractor shall be responsible for the repair of all defects, leaks or failures occurring in the installation for a period of three (3) years after completion of construction. A maintenance and warranty bond in the amount of 108 of the estimated or actual construction cost, whichever is greater, shall be furnished to the District within thirty (30) days after. completion of construction. If the owner or his contractor fails to make required repairs or replacements promptly, the District shall make them,. and the cost thereof shall be paid by the owner, his contractor or the surety. The fees required will be: 5650.00 7. Attorney-fees will be required only where a license agreement is required and these will be payable directly to the law firn of the District's attorney. and, BE IT BIIRTSER RB8OLV8D, that the Secretary of the District is hereby ordered to send copies of this resolution to all planning and approval agencies in Ada and Canyon Counties and in the Cities of Boise, Meridian, and Nampa, to the County Commissioners of Ada and Canyon Counties and to the Mayors of Boise, Meridian and Nampa to provide sufficient copies of the policy and application form for the continual administration and use thereof by all interested parties. -3- STATE OF IDAHO ) ss. County of Canyon ) On this 16th day of Juae 1992, before ma, the undersigned, a Notary Public, in and for said State, personally appeared Dares R. Coos, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that ha executed the same. ZN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. ~~.~~ p, N . M~ O,• /,/ L Notary Public -State of Idaho ;••m:'.AVBL1L~j0 ~ Residing at Caldwell, Idaho ••••~9~..~.~~~ ~~$~,•~' My Commission Expires: .11/04/94 -q- , • '`' ~-- NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT (Reproduction of this form is not acceptable) 1. (Proposed Name of Subdivision or Development) 2. (General Location) 3. (Legal Description - Attach if necessary) 4. (Owner of Record) (Address) 5. (Subdivider or Developer) (Address) LAND USE CHANGE/SITE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - Page 1 of 2 " .__ 6. (Engineer) (Address) (Person to Contact) (Phone) 7. Acres ; No. of Lots Number of Lote/Gross Acre 8. Proposed drainage Name of Dra 9. Is irrigation water to be provided to property? If yes, answer the following: a) Proposed delivery point (Canal or Lateral) b) Present delivery point for this c) Type of system 1) Gravity (Piped or open ditches) 2) Pump pressure (Signature) (Date) (Application must be filed with the Secretary of the District.. The appropriate fee6 and two (2) copies of all plats and drawings must be included with the application.) LAND USE CHANGE/SITE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - Page 2 of 2 0 ~C ~ r y q ~ rC C~ C ~ H ~gg f7 m ~ Kg N ~~ N O v b7 ~ ~ N • L=7 d M N ~ ~ Z O ~ ~yy C~ ~j [n ~ 33 ',O 'A r M z ~ r g b ~ ~ o M i ri ~ g 8 ~' r 3 i ~ ~ N 3 a+ z d y ` ~-+ z n T' r 3 ~ i i r ro ~ O y Eby 3 r~i H H O zg r r H o r ~ '" ~ r q H I~ ~ I~ I I I 9 Y ~ ~ M q r y Z yy Z ~ ~S ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ c M ~ U 7 p O %3 ~ AA H ° ~t o~ v y r ; ~ 3 N C N ro H n c~ I y~y C+J H I N 3 O S I~ I~ ICI N y H Vi zy y N O i ~ L*1 Ig to ~ ~ O r ~ N H N J H ~~I I N .Z' K1 m~ O I k ly N 3 I ~4 3 r N r r N I~ L`- ~ ~ ~ N r ro r H 4 W 3 b 4 ty~ M b y~ W ~' C G'~ Q H N F-' N ~C r W d0 d OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City perk JANICE L GASS, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. Glty Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supl. JONN T. SNAWCROFT, Waale Water Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, Firo Cnlet W.L. "BILL" GGRDDN, Police Caief W AYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney S HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place [o Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 866-0433 • FAX (208) 8874813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 687-2211 GRANT P. KINGSFORD Mayor June 1, 1994 Idaho Power Company 130 East Idaho P.O. Box 428 Meridian, Idaho 83680 888-4491 RE: STREET LIGHTS FOR THE LANDING N0.4 SUBDIVISION CODNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAX VERRINGTON ROBERT O. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Planner 8 Zoning AOmiNSUalor JIM JOHNSON Chairman ~ Planning d Zoning Street Lights have been installed by the developer in The Landing No. 4 Subdivision. These are 100 watt high pressure sodium lights on steel poles, owned by the City of Meridian. The three (3) street lights are located at: Lot 16 Block 5 563 S. Canvasback Way Lot 22 Block 5 669 S. Canvasback Way Lot 39 Block 1 519 S . Pelican Way See attached map for additional information. Please use this letter as your authority to activate these street lights. Sincerely, ~,~~{~ William G. Berg, Jr. City Clerk A PL4T SHOWING '~~~ LAN~~I~TG SU~~ ~ V~S~ON 1~T0 . ~ A PORTION OF' THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 13, T.3N., R.1W., BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN GTY, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO A BRIGHTON CORPORAAON St1BDlYl510N rows sic yr `' '"° "' ' "- B° -JOHNSON ENGINEERING 1993 - C ~ ! F N0. D9pM4{ ~. _1. 1fi1 i .3 S~rae t Li9k t .g I. I° 1 I 1 I LANDING SUBDIVISION N0. 3 I I I 1 !~ I S 589'49'00 1 i 44.00 ~ I pllntt vabrt ~ 7 ~vn s S~ _____ ~ s/r RN ~ S89'49'00"E ~/ 990 '- 1 .00 I i~ 1 $ la t I ~ I , UNPLATTED i I~ I M I I I a ,3 tIr woN vw eoNNen k C N0. 8733763 UNPLATTED N34'43'12" ~N62'10'42~E 149.OS' 50.00' 74.33' rn . ~ ~ ~ N 34 59" E C1 a" ~6.3~ N t00.ty tib ~ ~.9 ~ &1 l o~ I ~ ~~ m~ KI I~a39 ~v i ~ N ?~.t.~E 1w bbd :o i ig ' ~ So1 1E ° 01 Z I ^ Y1 2941 ly 38 *l tob.aa f __~. , ~ r0 uu.w Iw 16 ~ I$ w Ne9s3 tSE I 130,00• I$ 17 I w6vs3zSE 1~ so ao: IN V I$ 18 W 03439'2SE 130.00' I ^ 6. I15.03'~ I ig ~ ~~~~q~c I .>dAt... _. '~, 20 ___. ~~ ~ 21 6~? ~ Fa ~ S , ~~~: 2 KENN Y LATERAL 8 W ~' IRRIGATION EASEMENT I `~ 30 ~I 1 jn ' ~ ~ 1$ 37 .t ,~3.~ .E 1 W ttt.76• . I Nee3rtrE p 37 o I 1 tao.oe ^1 Netr3rue i$ 36 u niu 32 rO~ 33 tuu.,a ~ E,V ~S 35 J • 1 $ 1 IIOT G3 N668]'tSE ~ I tWA3. G 34 P R r. ~ 1 b~ . T rA~ 22 ~T ~O7y ~~, ~g 23 Nm SET _V9S0 _ \'; \ ~Ob~. aJ ti ~s~ ,~',~ g ~ s/c vx tmNtSS maFrt ~9~ rover Nor sEr UNPLAT7ED 100.00' 1 N r 1 v 1 ul o 1134 soa51 1127 i~{, p 2 ~' :1 ~) ,~.rssE tooar 1 r 81 J~ 1 $1 •r , W /S 19'20' 1 C" E 56.43 W. EGRET UNPLAT' W. L~~i'V f 1 ~ 00.00'. 7751. ~E ~ ~gl N 1 &~ o _. 1~5~ at 1141 ~I 3 ~I o N3T11YVE 1 4, too.oa 1 a? U( ol'1 ~ 2 ~$I m t0S3]'tSE ~_ GFFIDIALB WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., Gty Clerk JANICE L GA55, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E. City Engineer BRUCE D. 9TUART, Wstar Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Wstar Supt. KENNY W. BOWERS, flro GINf W.L "BILL" CORDON, Pollee Chlel WAYNEG. CROOKSTON, JR., Anamq • HUB OFTREASURE VALLEY • A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208)8864433 • PAX (IDB) 6874813 PubBc Works/Building Department (208)887-2211 GRANT P. KMdSFORD Mayor July 14, 1994 Idaho Power Company Attn: Ken or Mark 130 East Idaho P.O. Box 428 Meridian, ID 83680 (208)888-4491 RE: STREET LIGHTS IN LANDING SUBDIVISION NO. 4, NO. 5, AND NO.6 COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALO R. TOLSMA MAXYERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SHARI STILES Plsrmer 6 Zonlnq Aommismtor JIM JOHNSON Chairmen - Planning d Zoning I have inspected and approved the following street lights in Landing Subdivision No. 4, No. 5, and No. 6: Landing Subdivision No. 4: Lot 16 Block 5 563 S. Canvasback Way Lot 22 Block 5 669 S. Canvasback Way Lot 39 Block 1 519 S. Pelican Way Landing Subdivision No. 5: Lot 3 Block 6 1141 W. Greenhead St. Lot 8 Block 6 1029 W. Greenhead St. Landing Subdivision No. 6: Lot 6 Block 7 1075 W. Egret Drive. Lot 11 Block 7 959 W. Egret Drive Lot 3 Block 8 1109 W. Loon St. Lot 7 Block 8 1029 W. Loon St. Respectfully, City of Meridian Jim Gratiot / ~~~ Electrical Inspector cc: File City Clerk OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG. JR., DItY Cbrk JANICE L. GASS, CKy Trswurar GARY D. SMITH, R.E. Clly Englnsar BRUCE D. STUART, WNa Works Supf. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waala Walar Supl. KENNY W. BOW ERS. Firo Coief W.L. "BILL" GORDON. Pones Ckial WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR.. AIIOmW ~OQ~ GRAM P. KINGSFORD Mayor October 20, 1995 David Turnbull President, Brighton Corporation 12301 W. Explorer Drive, Suite 200 Boise, Idaho 83704 COUNCIL MEMBERS RONALD R. TOLSMA MAk YERRINGTON ROBERT D. CORRIE WALT W. MORROW SNARI STILES RIMlrlaf 6 Zonfoq ACminialrolOl JIM JOHNSON CAa1rmM ~ Warning d Zoning Re: Tiling the Rennedy Lateral Adjacent to The Landing #4 Subdivision Dear Mr. Turnbull: Please find enclosed a copy of a letter the City received from Tucker M. Johnson, Vice President of Skyline Corporation. Mr. Johnson states that Skyline Corporation is being required to the the Rennedy Lateral that runs through or along The Landing #7. Be states that a portion of the Rennedy Lateral runs between both The Landing #4, which you developed, and The Landing #7, in which he is in the process of developing and he states it appears that the developer for phase 4 was not required by the city to the the Rennedy Lateral along phase number four's frontage. Section 11-9-605 M, PIPING OF DITCHES, which requires that irrigation ditches, laterals, or canals intersecting, crossing, or lying adjacent and contiguous, or which canals, ditches or laterals touch either or both sides of the area being subdivided, shall be covered and enclosed with tiling, was passed by the City Council in October of 1991. Therefore, this tiling requirement was required to be met by Brighton Corporation when they developed The Landing #4 Subdivision. Gary Smith commented on April 10, 1992, regarding The Landing #2 Subdivision Preliminary Plat, which Preliminary Plat included the land that was developed as The Landing #4, and he commented as follows: "6. What is the plan for piping of the Rennedy Lateral HUB OFTREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO IvIERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (2116) 8884433 • FAX (206) 8874813 Public Works/BuiWing Department (208)887-2211 through block 5?" Also, in the request for subdivision approval for the preliminary plat of The Landing Subdivision #4, submitted by Skyline Corporation, a copy of which is attached, it states in Item #4 under STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE as follows: "4. Development will comply with city ordinances." Also, in City Engineer, Gary Smith's, comments on The Landing Subdivision #2 preliminary plat, which included the land which was subsequently developed as The Landing #4, Mr. Smith commented as follows: "5. Any and all irrigation and drainage ditches passing though this subdivision shall be piped, with material acceptable to the users or maintaining agency, with cleanout structures at maximum 300 foot intervals and grated inlet structure." I have attached a copy of this comment also for your information and use. Also, Mr. Turnbull, at the Planning and Zoning public hearing on April 14, 1992, regarding this land, Ted Hepper and you had a short discussion which is quoted below: HEPPER: Did you have any problem with the City Engineer's comments? TURNBULL: No. The traffic study is underway now. HEPPER: Do you plan on piping those ditches? TURNBULL: They hadn't addressed that. There is the Rennedy Lateral which could be re-piped. I have also enclosed a copy of that portion of the minutes of the hearing for your use. The tiling Ordinance was in effect and required to be met at the time of the preliminary plat for what was subsequently developed as The Landing #4 Subdivision. It also was in effect when the final plat for The Landing #4 Subdivision was approved. The City adequately put Skyline Corporation on notice that the piping of the ditch was required. Mr. Ted Johnson, in the request for subdivision approval, stated that development will comply with all City Ordinances. Section 11-9-605.M, PIPING OF DITCHES, was an Ordinance that was in effect at the time of submission of the preliminary plat of The Landing Subdivision #4. I certainly do not know at what point in time the title to the land that you developed as The Landing #4 was transferred from Skyline Corporation to Brighton Corporation, but any representation's or commitments about the land made by Skyline are binding on Brighton Corportion. That date, however, is irrelevant since your predecessor, Skyline ~ • Corporation, was duly informed of the requirement of the tiling of the Kennedy Lateral and, therefore, you are deemed to have notice of the requirement and the City Ordinances in a =oval and when you Corporation submitted their request for plat app purchased the property, required that all ditches within a subdivision or adjacent thereto, be tiled. Brighton Corporation, therefore, had the duty to comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the the Kennedy Lateral. Brighton still has that duty. THEREFORE, DEMAND IS HEREBY MADE UPON BRIGHTON CORPORATION TO TILE THE KENNEDY LATERAL. The irrigation water has been shut off for the winter season, and you should have no difficulty in completing that tiling on or before November 30, 1995. if the tiling is not completed on or before November 30, 1995, the City will pursue additional action to specifically enforce the provision of the Meridian Ordinance requiring that the Kennedy Lateral be tiled. Just a comment to you. I have attached a copy of Tucker M. Johnson's letter to Mayor Ringsford. It states that the approximate per foot cost of tiling this ditch is $60.00 and the cost of one-half of the 326.67 feet which crosses both the land owned by Brighton Corporation, in The Landing #4, and the land within The Landing #7, owned by Skyline Corporation, and it would definitely appear that both Brighton Corporation and Skyline Corporation could well cooperate in this matter and achieve this tiling at a reasonable cost, as stated in Mr. Johnson's letter, of $9,800.00 for each land owner. Very Truly Yours, Wayne G. Crookston, Jr. Meridian City Attorney WGC/tap cc: Tucker M. Johnson Mayor Grant Ringsford ~_~~^ C13eptember 21, 1995 ~ Skyline ~- CORPORATION Mayor Gram P. Kingsford City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Tiling of Kennedy lateral Dear Mayor Kingsford: We are proceeding with the tiling of the Kennedy Lateral. In the process of putting ffiis tiling Project together, two issues have arisen. The first is that since the northern ProP~Y boundary of The Landing No. 7 is the center line of the Kennedy Laterat, we therefor own only half the lateral. Tiling is not only required for our side, but will also be required of the property owner(s) on the north side of the Lateral when the property develops. A "Late Comers" ordinance pertaining to tiling of waterways is therefore appropriate, At your direction, Wayne Forrey has begun to draft such an ordinance and will be submitting it for Council approval shoNy. The second issue which has arisen is as follows: The Kennedy Lateral runs though or along our Landing No. 7 project for approximately 1200 feet. Of the 1200 feet, we co-own approximately 610 feet of the lateral with Mr. t.rary Forr's (Mr. Forr's frontage is marked in yellow of the attached plat), and we co-own 326.67 feet of the lateral with the lot owners of the already developed Landing No. 4 (marked in pink). We did not develop The Landing No. 4. It appears that the developer for phase 4 was not required by the City to file the Kennedy along phase no. 4's frontage. However, we are being required by the City to file our frontage. The City's decision to not require one emity, but later require another entity (Skyline) to file that same section of ditch (all under.the same ordinance) is inconsistem and appears arbitrary. Which raises the issue at hand: If the Kebeedy Lateral is to be tiled for that 326.67 foot section, who is iA pay for the Landing No. 4 (pink) half of it? A late comers condition is not possible for the 326.67 feet because the development of phase 4 is complete. We firmly hold that we are not responsible for tiling the North half of the 326.67 feet. The approximate'per foot eost of tiling this ditch (materials only) is 560.00. Thus, the cost of one-half of the 326.67 feet would be approximately $9,800.00. There seems to be only two possible solutions. First, the City or Nampa-Meridian pays for the tiling of one-half of the 326.67 feet, or second, the ditch is not tiled for that 326.67 feet. ~J Your prompt attention and reply regarding this matter is appreciated. Sincerely, Tucker .Johnson Vice 1?residem