Loading...
2009 02-19:pit ~~ : ~} a ;_ ~~_ ~'`~Af ,,._ ~ ~'~;.~_ ~,x ~~~ ~, Meridian Planning and Zoning Meeting February 19, 2009 Meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission of February 19, 2009, was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman David Moe. Members Present: Chairman David Moe, Commissioner Joe Marshall, Commissioner Tom O'Brien and Commissioner Wendy Newton-Huckabay. Members Absent: Commissioner Michael Rohm Others Present: Ted Baird, Machelle Hill, Pete Friedman, Caleb Hood, Sonya Wafters, Scott Steckline and Dean Willis. Item 1: Roll-Call Attendance: Roll-call X Wendy Newton-Huckabay X Tom O'Brien Michael Rohm -Vice Chairman X Joe Marshall X David Moe -Chairman Moe: Good Evening, ladies and gentlemen. I'd like to welcome you to the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning and Zoning for February the 19th and I'd like to call this meeting to order and ask the clerk to call roll, please. Item 2: Adoption of the Agenda: Moe: Okay. Next item on the agenda is the adoption of the agenda and there are a couple changes you folks need to know in the audience probably. There are a few hearings that will be continued. Items No. 4, 5 and 6, which are AZ 08-015, RZ 08-009, and PP 08-012 for Fignut will be continued to our regularly scheduled meeting of March the 5th. Also Item No. 12, which is AZ 08-016 for Southridge; that as well will be continued to the meeting of March the 5th. So, Commissioners, as I have noted that, can I get a motion to adopt the revised agenda? Newton-Huckabay: So moved. Marshall: Second. Moe: It's been moved and seconded to approve the revised agenda. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? The motion carves. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 3: Consent Agenda: ~~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 2 of 32 <-~~; .:~ A. Approve Minutes of February 5, 2009 Planning and Zoning ' Commission Meeting: ~y - ,:'¢ B. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP _ 08-032 Request for Conditional Use Permit for a residential care .facility in an L-O district for Locust Grove Plaza by Rub /Edward y s: Architecture + Design -1695 S. Locust Grove Road Moe: Next item on the agenda is the Consent Agenda. We have two items on that y`` . Item A is to approve meeting minutes of February the 5th, 2009, Planning and Zoning ` ~ Meeting. And Item B is the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for approval of CUP 08-032 for Locust Grove Plaza. Commissioners, any comments, questions, or can I get a motion to approve the Consent Agenda? . . O'Brien: So moved. * 4 Marshall: Second. ~ f ~; ~. Moe: It's been moved and seconded to approve the Consent Agenda. All those in favor K,: say aye. Opposed? That motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. ~£~~; Moe: Thank you. Folks, before I open the public hearing, if there is anyone out there ` ' that has not been to one of the Planning and Zoning's meetings, I will give you just a ' ~ ~~:~ brief overview of the format. I will open the hearing, at which point the staff will give a brief overview of the project, walking through what their findings were. After that point -- at that point the applicant will come forward and have 15 minutes to discuss and m k a e any comments on the proposal that they would like the Commission to hear. After that point there are sign-up sheets in the back for anyone that would like to speak to that ;~ ~ hearing and each person would have a three minute time period to make their comments. After all the folks that are signed in have been taken care of, I will ask once ~ again if there is anyone else in the audience that would like to speak to that hearing and s~~ ~~ ; they will be given their three minutes as well. Once that is resolved I will, then, ask the applicant to come back up and, basically, rebut or just give explanation to some of the t ;' _ ' _ questions that may have come up during the public hearing portion. After that point, then, the Commission will deliberate and make determinations. .;~ Item 4: Public Hearing: AZ 08-015 Request for Annexation and Zoning i~' - consisting of 15.05 acres from Ada County RUT to C-G (General Retail fr ~' ~ A and Service Commercial) and I-L (Light Industrial) zones for Fignut by Ronald Van Auker -west side of S. Locust Grove, north of E. Overland Road and south of I-84: Item 5: Public Hearing: RZ 08-009 Request for Rezone of 1.69 acres from C-G ~` A' w ~ (General Retail and Service Commercial) to I-L (Light Industrial) zone for . + ~ _ el~~i~ r i ~ Sta:`~ Cf~~ . ~~ ~' ~^~'' s .luh :.~ . - ~ Sr'i, :. i .. ~e ~,~` kit ``.'~.~*, :-.=~ ,.}. -,}: '~ ~ 4~ :; ~{ ~y ;{ r x~,: .:,~; Meridian Planning 8 Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 3 of 32 Fignut by Ronald Van Auker -west side of S. Locust Grove, north of E. Overland Road and south of I-84: Item 6: Public Hearing: PP 08-012 Request for Preliminary Plat approval consisting of 6non-residential building lots and 1 other lot in a proposed C-G and I-L zoning districts for Fignut by Ronald Van Auker -west side of S. Locust Grove, north of E. Overland Road and south of I-84: Moe: So, having said that, I now would like to open the public hearing -- yes, I will. Public hearing for the sole purpose of continuing it to our regularly scheduled meeting of March the 5th for AZ 08-015, RZ 08-009, and PP 08-012 for Fignut. Can I get a motion to continue those hearings? Marshall: So moved. O'Brien: Second. Moe: It's been moved and seconded to approve the continuation of AZ 08-015, RZ 08- 009 and PP 08-012 for Fignut to the regularly scheduled meeting of March the 5th. All those in favor say aye. Opposed. That motion carries. ' MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 7: Public Hearing: CPA 09-003 Request to change the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designation on 2.051 acres of land from "medium density residential" to "commercial" for Goff by Garland Goff and Shannon Hamrick - 1665, 1705 and 1725 W. Pine Avenue: Item 8: Public Hearing: AZ 09-001 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 0.76 of an acre of land with a C-N zoning district for GofF by Garland Goff and Shannon Hamrick - 1725 W. Pine Avenue: Moe: At this time I'd like to open the public hearing on CPA 09-003 for Goff and start with the staff report, please. Baird: Mr. Chair? At this time you might also want to open the associated item AZ 09- 001. Moe: Thank you very much. And I would also like to open AZ 09-001, please. Friedman: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. Before Ms. Wafters gets into the staff report and the findings for you, Ijust -- as a little bit of background information, I would like to let you know how this application started to evolve to what it is tonight. The subject property, at least one of the three properties that is involved in the Comprehensive Plan amendment and the one that is the subject of the annexation and zoning request was originally part of the larger implied consent k~,Y~. ax~~~: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 4 of 32 annexation that you considered a few weeks back. In our discussions with that particular property owner about their future plans for the property, realizing that at the time as part of the implied consent annexation it would have been zoned residential, staff had made some interpretations of the code regarding their proposed actions and regrettably on our part we made a mistake and so in order to correct that mistake and allow them to proceed forward with what they were proposing, we recommended and you subsequently. removed the property from the implied consent annexation. We, then, worked with the applicant and looked at the surrounding area to determine what would be the best for the area, as well as the applicant. And so that's the reason why they are there before you tonight with a separate annexation and zoning request. So, with that point of clarification I'll turn it over to Sonya to complete the presentation. Wafters: Thank you, Chairman Moe, Members of the Commission. The first application before you is a Comprehensive Plan amendment to change the future land use map designation on 2.05 acres of land consisting of three tax parcels from medium density residential to commercial. The properties are located at 1665, 1705 and 1725 West Pine Avenue on the south side of Pine west of Linder Road. You can see here is a zoning map in the upper left corner and an aerial of the three properties on the lower right. Surrounding uses to the north across Pine is Meridian High School, zoned R-4. To the east is property owned by ACHD, zoned L-O. To the south is a storage facility zoned I-L. And to the west is a single family residential property, zoned R-1 in Ada County. This is the existing future land use map showing medium density residential designation for the subject properties and the applicant's proposed future land use map changes showing commercial for these three properties. Because there properties alt front on West Pine Avenue, a minor arterial street and because there is L-O zoned property to the east and I-L zoned property to the south and east, and a high school across the street, staff believes that commercial uses are more appropriate than residential in this area. The second application is an annexation and zoning request of one of the parcels, the .76 acre parcel, with a C-N zoning district. That property is located at 1725 West Pine Avenue. The applicant estimated the site plan showing how the existing residential property is proposed to redevelop as a swim facility. The site plan shows the existing home that's proposed to remain and the applicant is proposing to construct an approximate 70 foot by 81 foot addition -- square foot I should say. The swim facility is proposed to consist of approximately 1,300 square feet of administrative area, 6,200 square feet of instruction area, mechanical and storage areas. The facility will have a -- will have three small in ground warm water teaching pools, changing stalls, bathroom facilities, and a waiting viewing area. The facility is currently operating in Meridian and will continue to provide the community with a learn to swim program for beginners and efficiencies in swim stroke instruction for valley tri-athletes and other more advanced swimmers in this new location. Access to the site is proposed via one access driveway, two from West Pine Avenue in its current location. Off street parking is shown on the site plan, which meets and exceeds the standards listed in the UDC for commercial uses. The fire department approved turn around is also proposed on the site as requested by the fire department. Cross-access is not proposed on the site plan to adjacent properties. Staff has included a development agreement provision for the applicant to provide cross-access to the properties to the west and east for future -'EwY ~:t~~ ,, ,: -, ``;; t_ ~~' F ;:~ ~° ~~= Y ~ .. ~~~: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 5 of 32 interconnectivity upon development of these properties and as an effort to reduce access points on Pine Avenue and minor arterial streets. The applicant has submitted building elevations showing what the proposed addition will look like and how it will integrate with the existing structure. There have been many, many letters of testimony in support of this application received by the city that are in the public record. The applicant has also submitted a response in agreement with the staff report. Staff would like to note that the Commission may want to defer their action on this application until the end of the meeting in case there are some of the other Comprehensive Plan amendments that may require continuance to another meeting, so that they can all move forward to Council at the same time, since Comp Plan amendments -- map amendments can only be heard every six months. Staff is recommending approval of the subject Comp Plan amendment and annexation applications with a development agreement. We will need a revised site plan prior to approval of the development agreement that shows the cross-access to adjacent properties. That's all staff has at this time. Moe: Okay. Any questions of staff at this time? Would the applicant like to come forward? Please state your name and address, please. Goff: My name is Garland R. Goff and this is my daughter Shannon Hamrick. .~ Moe: Address? Goff: 2010 North Mombarto Avenue in Boise, Idaho. n= ;.Y~ >. ;; ~~ ~ tiFr ~~r.:-~ ?'1' Hamrick: And give you mine, too? Moe: No. You're fine. Hamrick: Okay. Goff: Chairman Moe and the Commissioners, I just wanted to take just a very few minutes here to say that I'm really happy to be here finally. It's been an arduous ten months of part-time work to get the surveys, the drawings, zoning, landscape plans, code requirements and meeting with other authorities, but we finally made it and with the patience and finalized guidance of Pete, Sonya, and Christie, we are here. We are also joined in this Comprehensive Plan by Rock Brown of Launch Ministries which is at the 1705 Pine Avenue and Bill Newhouse of 1665 Pine Avenue. Both of these neighbors support our efforts and, in fact, they are supposed to be here tonight. Are they here? Anyway, we -- I just wanted to take just a couple minutes to go over the plans that we have for this facility. My daughter has been working since 2004 in Meridian starting a business. Started with eight kids. She now has over 200 kids that she's -- kids and adults that she's teaching swimming -- swimming to. She works 55, 60 hours a week over these -- over these long months and now we are to a point that we want to expand her business from the small beginnings that we had to this facility that we purchased last year and have been attempting to get the zoning for. We propose to ~~~ . :_~. _. Meridian Planning 8 Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 6 of 32 ;~~; build a green facility. It will be a monolithic dome and for those not quite familiar with a ` ~~~ monolithic dome, it's a rebar reinforced concrete structure with the walls and dome roof consisting of reinforced concrete three inches -- up to three and a half inches to 11 ~: inches thick at the base, with three inches of polyurethane foam insulation and single ply roof membrane. This will also have stem walls, as you will see there. Stem walls there. They are going to be either concrete or they will be concrete block, insulated ~= ~ ~ block, with a brick fascia to it. And I think that this facility is going to be one of the more ~ [' energy efficient facilities in the city. The USA swimming committee's -- USA swimming facility development staff, which is a US Olympic Committee in Colorado Springs, estimates that this kind of facility will save approximately six percent in overall energy consumption during its life when compared with traditional structures that are -- that are ,: built natatorium style. We propose that we are going to use drain back solar energy to collect -- to heat water to augment the heating of our swimming pools. We are also ` . going to use dehumidifiers that have the components necessary to capture and transfer *j' ~ energy and use that also to augment the heating of the pool waters. And some of the '~` a :'~~~ other benefits of our -- of our facility -- of course, being a dome itself its safety as far as fire goes. The Uniform Building Code characterizes this kind of structure on their ability to resist fire. Types one and two structures are built primarily of noncombustible materials and this dome is a type two or better. The Federal Energy Administration or agency has developed construction criteria which makes structures built following - standards -- following the standards able to provide near absolute protection from injury c;4 or death caused by tornadoes and hurricanes, though we don°t have many of those, it is successful in earthquake survivorship as well. The Department of Energy maintains an energy star program and this dome -- or monolithic domes gain this kind of rating. So - ~ '~~ ~ , in summary, the dome that we propose -- the structure that we are proposing here ~ about 5,000, you know, 6,200 square feet addition to -- to the existing facility, which we :'t are going to change into or just remodel into administrative offices. The monolithic dome will be a very permanent structure, energy efficient, cost effective, and disaster resistant and we hope attractive. I think that you will see that that's a reasonably ~ft. attractive building for the area. And now I'd just like to have Shannon give some of her comments concerning the community benefits associated with this business expansion ~~. ~y activity within Meridian. h. ~`~ Hamrick: All right. I guess we have always, when we started four years ago or five years ago, almost, we started with a little endless pool I don't know if you're familiar . with that, but it's like a treadmill for swimmers. It's about 14 feet long and seven feet wide and we got to where we were running about 175 kids through that pool and we <` needed to expand and so we went out and looked in search of larger water and, - unfortunately, Meridian didn't have any that was available for rent, so we went to Boise ,~ ~ ~ and we have moved probably five different locations and in the meantime all of our clients ended up traveling with us, so we went from one place to the other place, to the other place, and it was -- we were very fortunate to be in the locations that we were in, but it always had its challenges, as with anything that you're renting. We didn't have control over a lot of the things. We had issues with water chemistry. We had issues L with air quality. We had issues with cool temperature. The air temperature. Scheduling ; conflicts. And all of these things kind of make it -- you know, we have overcome them, s~ ~ ~y ~,~p~ ~k. ~q.. ' -. 9 ~~~~ Fd,.:. , ~ , )i °~ l ~~~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 7 of 32 ~ but it makes it very difficult to offer more venues on top of what we are already offering. ~, ` And right now our current clientele is actually six months old, so we teach all the way "'` from six months old all the way up to senior citizens. I think our oldest swimmer right now is 79, but -- anyway. So, we -- with all of those changes we have only been able to r A ';F_t - offer swim lessons, but we'd like to be able to enter more into the community and be able to offer more services, such as aquatic exercise for senior citizens or adaptive _ aquatics. We have had lots of parents call and ask if we can do adaptive aquatics. We just currently don't have the facility to be able to offer that. We don't have control over a =~ lot of the -- the temperatures and things that we need to have control over to ff th t ~: ' o er a kind of service. So, with this facility that we are proposing with the three different pools , we will be able to have different water temperatures, we will be able to have different ' depths, and we will be able to accommodate all those different people, so that we would ~~~ ~~¢ be able to, I don't know, just help the community at large, I guess. We also -- you know, with the help of this, we'd like to kind of establish ourselves as the water safety experts ~< ~.: in the area and really kind of team up with the police -- the local police and fire departments and go out and help educate people on a lot of the water safety stuff. People don't realize just with the irrigation ditches and things around here and all the r,~; ~ ` backyard pools, there is so many things that you can do to prevent all these drownings ` ~: ~- that we hear about eve ry year. So, anyway, with that I will close, but, hopefully, if some ~:, ~; of you feel that it would be of benefit to the community, we feel it will be a benefit to the ~~'' `'' ~ community and we would love to help everyone we can with this facility. ~~ >_.. Moe: Okay. Thank you. Any questions of the applicant? Newton-Huckabay: Everything was so thorough. Thank you for that. All the letters and `~' ,,, everything. I appreciate all the ground work. ~ ~, ~ ~ + Moe: Thank you very much. We do have a few folks that are signed up. First one on the list would be Kevin Wamer. And, again, when you come up, please state your :..:, name and address for the record, please. - Wamer: My name is Kevin Wamer and I live at 1600 West 7th Street in Meridian. I just a met these folks probably a month or so ago when I was looking for swim lessons for my two and a half year old son, he's almost three, and not much is offered in the valley for that young of a child. It's important for -- for me that they team how to swim, being that ~~ ~ we are an active family and like was said with the irrigation ditches around town, and ~~ one of the things that they -- they taught him first was to ask to swim. They always have ;,: to ask to get in the water. And, you know, it's something you don't think about, but, you know, kids need to team that before they ever touch the water they ask their parents. ;. My son has done amazing things so far and well on his way to teaming how to swim ~, . I'm also a United States masters swimmer and swim three to five days a week and as a r' ~ high school student they tore down our one and only pool where I grew up and -- and ~ ' ~~ `~ ~ because of asbestos and, you know, building problems and they kind of left us without a ~ pool in high school So, anything I can do to, you know, further along this sport that ~y love and that people can enjoy for their whole life I think is a great thing and completely support their business plan and their customer service and the way they run ,x ~; ~: ~~'~ { .°1 ~_ y: ;~y~. ~;,' ~4] SA ~~; ~: ~ ,< ~~.; ;_ ,~ .r~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 8 of 32 their business. So, I think this would be a great benefit to Meridian and aunique -- very unique business that could offer a lot to a lot of people. So, thank you. Moe: Any questions? Thank you very much. Next on the list is -- is it Kathy Fogg? Fogg: Good evening. I just want to tell you guys -- Moe: Please, name and address. Fogg: Oh, I'm song. My name is Kathy Fogg and I live at 610 East Trinidad Drive in Meridian. Moe: Thank you. Fogg: Thank you so much for having this very important thing before you guys tonight. I grew up not teaming how to swim and I'm very passionate about Shannon's program. She -- my kids have been in her swimming program for four years and I learned how to swim three years ago and I can't tell you what it has done for my life and for my kids' life to be able to get into the water and to not be afraid of the water. I grew up absolutely terrified of the water and the first year that I took lessons from Shannon and my daughter -- and I brought pictures of my family, because I want you to see that these are real people that this is affecting. This isn't just absentee people, this is real people. But we went on a vacation and it was the first time that I had actually gone into the ocean with my daughter to swim and my husband was sitting on the bank with our small son and we got out into the middle of the lagoon and my daughter, who was five at the time, all of a sudden started to panic. She got a little bit of water in her goggles and she started clawing on me. Well, I started to panic and, then, in about a split second I thought, oh, my gosh, I'm the mommy, if I don't do something, we will both drown out here and I thought immediately of the cues that I had listened to Shannon teach my daughter over and over and over and what she taught me and I popped my daughter in the head and looked at her and said roll to sweet spot and she went, oh, yeah, and she rolled over on her back and we paddled around and we paddled in -- so this is the end of our vacation day, instead of something that could have been very tragic, both of us losing our lives, I owe that to Shannon. When I came home from vacation that's the first thing I did was call her and tell her. My son is four. We went swimming two weeks ago to a swimming pool other than Shannon's. He sat on the edge and waited and waited and waited and I finally said what are you waiting for and he said for you to tell me I can get in the pool, because safety is so important. This is a marvelous, marvelous opportunity for Meridian to come together and to create this wonderful facility. We are surrounded by water. Everywhere we go there is ditches, there is canals, there is lakes, there is rivers, there is no reason why we don't have a community pool, something here that can benefit all of us in the community no matter what the age. Thank You. Moe: Thank you very much. Next on the list is T.J. Clifford. ,;~ ~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission = :;, February 19, 2009 _ ;: ~ ~ Page 9 of 32 } Clifford: Hello. My name is T.J. Clifford. I'm at 941 Pennwood Street, Meridian. I don't ;rc ~, 4 think I can do better than what you guys have already heard, but we have been with ., Shannon with slow aquatic for five -- about five years. I have two sons -- or we have ~,,,~ - two sons. We -- I guess before -- even before that we were with a couple different swimming pools, swimming instruction before that and we -- they were good. They taught safety and that kind of thing. And, then, we got to Shannon's and they were -- and she was teaching them technique like from day one and my wife is a collegiate -- was acollegiate swimmer as well and I -- we thought -- even both of us knowing what ~~ we knew about swimming, thought, yeah, it seems like there is -- they are not going to ~_'~ team that that fast, but we were reall im ressed. The Y p y quickly learned that technique. And I guess my emphasis is that not only is this teaching the safety that a lot of other ,fi ~ ~~ ~~ programs are also offering, but this is teaching the life sport. I mean this is technique that could be used for, you know, a lifetime, like you heard the 79 year old that's in the program right now. That's a life sport, but it could be the technique that they are ` teaming in it. It's collegiate. It's high school. It's Olympic. It's technique that they can ~ go pretty much as far as they really want to. So, that part of this program has really x~ ~. impressed us and in that five years both kids, a ten year old and an eight year old are `;~; , very comfortable swimming in the ocean when we visit relatives in areas where they got ,~ ~, to be able to swim in currents and waves and that kind of thing comfortable. No help r.. , no vest or an hm and very strong swimmers. Definitely stronger than me and, Y t ~ 9 , hopefully, they will get at least as strong or stronger than my wife. So, anyway, I -- you _~ know, my -- the overall summary from me and our family is this has really been a huge benefit to us, very impressed, and think it will be really -- the same benefit provided to a ~~ the community. It's in a -- I think a good location for Meridian, close to the school I think is important, but also like we have heard, it provides that -- the building, the facility that can support a lot of different programs for a lot of different ages. So, it's got the whole ~, ~.~ range, offering a very good range, even though Shannon said we had to move around a lot during that time it was worth it. So, I hope -- it sounds like you guys support it and I hope we continue to go down this road of getting that facility going. Moe: Thank you very much. Just in time. Rock Brown. He did check for it, too, so -- good evening. x~ Brown: Rock Brown. 2188 West Sonoma Drive. We own the property and the building s ,~ =:~;~ - right next to their property on just -- just east of them. We have a youth center. We .;:.v. refer to it as a total teen equipping center, a launch pad, where we provide Christian released time classes for some of the Meridian High School students. We provide peer _ tutoring programs, sports training, and some driver's training as well. So, we were very excited when we -- and had heard that the property had been purchased next to us and k,~ that the vision for it was to build this aquatic center and we just thought that it kind of fit '.;~r in -- in with some of the things that we -- and in the community and in particular with young people in the community. So, after getting a phone call from Shannon and her ~' ~; _,~ ~ father and sitting down and discussing what their thoughts were related to their -- what they were developing, we couldn't be more exited to have neighbors like them. We have discussed the possibilities of doing some things jointly together, which is, you know, kind of fun teamwork things to do and we are in a great location there, right Y4 ~T~.th ~~pp ., _ '-. - . ~: ~~ fi.. _. .. ._ :,; f ~ ,. .. ~. .. . ~* <,; tt: ;~ .M1 ^tiTx ~. -~ -~ ~~`. >> ~} Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 10 of 32 across from the high school with all kinds of possibilities of helping reach that educational community, helping to undergird it with real positive programs and I believe this is a very positive program. Moe: Thank you very much. That's all that was signed up. Is there anyone else in the audience that would like to speak to this? Against? No? For? Okay. Thank you. Newton-Huckabay: Mr. Chair? Moe: Commissioner Newton-Huckabay Newton-Huckabay: I just want to make sure I didn't miss something. The other property that's being requested -- the one on the west side, that's in this map amendment. Your little blurb was just pointing out the one of the three, the one in the middle? Wafters: Chairman Moe, Commissioner Newton-Huckabay, the -- the three properties you see here are the subject of the Comprehensive Plan map amendment. Only the -- the property is here only for the annexation. That is the property on the far west -- Newton-Huckabay: And, then, so, Mr. Brown. -- Wafters: The gentleman that just testified has the R-2 property in the center. Newton-Huckabay: Okay. So, the property owner to the farthest east of this, it's --did miss some? Moe: Yeah. That was -- Wafters: It's the center property. If you look at the map here -- Moe: The center property. The R-2. Wafters: Zoned R-2. Moe: The gentleman was just -- Newton-Huckabay: Okay. Who owns this one? ~ Moe: Do we know who owns the -- the farthest -- Newton-Huckabay: The farthest one to the east. Wafters: Yes. Just a moment. Raymond and Danielle Newhouse. ~q,; .~ ...: . ., ~ ., P~ .. ~~. ~:..: `R _ ~. ~. i., Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 .ry Page 11 of 32 : ~;~ ~~ Newton-Huckabay: Okay. Did I miss their -- did they have a written comment or any -~ _ Jr~{ comment? ° Wafters: I don't believe they submitted any written comments on this application. Uk_ Newton-Huckabay: Okay. That's -- Wafters: I don't know if they are in the audience tonight or not. E~ ~,~~ Moe: Okay. Wafters: Yeah. They did submit an affidavit of legal interest agreeing with this applicant, though, as part of the application. Newton-Huckabay: Okay. ~~ ~' "~~ ~ Moe: Okay. ~~= Newton-Huckabay: I just have one question for the applicant, if she will come back up. ~' Moe: Would the applicant come back up, please. ~ Newton-Huckabay: Yeah. I was just curious how many people will use this facility at ~~:h one time, the class sizes, that type of thing, and how long each of the classes are and ~~ how much turnover is going to be going through the building in a day ~~ . Hamrick: So, we run normally about four kids per class and depending on which pool ' we have in there, we could probably run, with all of the pools, we could run six to eight classes at one time. So, that might be 24 kids -- 24 in the water at one time. We do classes every 30 minutes, so probably -- we normally right now have morning classes r~ - and, then, we take a break for lunch and, then, we start up again in the aftemoon -- like ' ~~ mid aftemoon, evening time, and we normally finish by 7:30. ~~` '~ Newton-Huckabay: Okay. And, then, my last question was related to -- you have 31 `~ parking stalls, which, obviously, meets code, but I didn't notice, do you have parking for F say bigger things, such as school buses or any kind of thing that might carry a larger group of people? If you -- do you see a need for anything like that? ~~ ~ Goff: We don't have parking for that -- those kinds of vehicles on this site plan It is a -- y . you know .76 property -- acre property, so, no, we don t have that, other than the y--we a~ ,~,~ ,,,,~; do have a place where they can turn around and go -- Newton-Huckabay: You do have the room to turn around. I did notice that. Okay. r : Goff: We also have the no parking zone for the fire -- the hammerhead for the fire -- ; . ~~t, sue,, ,.~ ~; ~~~: Y., } .. ,. ,.., ~.. _~~~ -= ~4~j. ~1, .. ... k ~: ~y ,. E --war, _, r "K .», -t .~ ;r: ': °.~ k ~~1 . t- ~~i ~~',y4;~ ~ `:,' ~: °. ~. .~ ;> Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 12 of 32 Watters: And they can park there. Newton-Huckabay: If there is a fire you have got to leave. I just -- I can see an opportunity for something like that in your type of facility, especially if you're talking about people's adaptive programs and that type of thing. But as long as the bus could get in there and turn around and, then, I think it would be fine. I have no other questions. I think this is great and I wish you the best of luck. I think it will be a wonderful addition. The building's interesting looking. I'd like to see it when it's done. Moe: Thank you very much i Goff: Thank you. ® Moe: Commissioners, any other comments? Questions? O'Brien: I think it's a great project for this community. I really do. It's just -- I agree with the importance of teaching swimming to all ages. I learned in the Mississippi River and that was kind of scary. Playing hooky from school, but not the way to learn. So, this is great. Moe: No. I would agree. I think this is a fabulous project. It sounds like it's a fabulous business, actually. It's good hearing the stories from people who have been in here and it definitely will be -- it would be a great addition to Meridian, there is no doubt about it. I do -- you know, one item that -- I don't want to say it bothers me, but, you know, when we are changing, you know, the CPA in this area with the medium residential and whatnot, I think when we get around to -- if, in fact, the zoning -- if we are making the change at that point, that I don't know that I wouldn't mind trying to restrict it to where it is this type of facility is why we are making this change in the C-N zoning, as opposed to whatever else we could get in a C-N zone, if you understand what I'm saying. Newton-Huckabay: Sure. Sure. . ;_.,;, , .~. zFi 'r ;~~- 4x ~: .W...~~ :~~i"~ ~;: ~~r 'r,K Moe: That's my biggest concern. That's something you guys need to kind of think about. Like it was discussed earlier when we do get ready to, we will be able to close the public hearing, but we will want to go ahead and postpone action until after the last CPA, because we will have to follow those all the way through at the same time, so -- Newton-Huckabay: Mr. Chair, so on that do we need to -- I mean actually list those things that we would exclude, should it go to some -- not come together as this aquatics or -- I mean how are you recommending that we use that terminology to limit non- desirable uses in that area? Moe: Basically, within the motion you can -- you can put pretty much that we are making -- we are making that change, but we wanted to, basically, adhere it to an aquatics type facility or -- well, I mean that's kind of where I'm going with it. But I realize we have that other property on the east -- the problem is I just want to make sure that ' Meridian Planning 8~ Zoning Commission Februa 19 2009 r7`. ry , Page 13 of 32 h=~ we are not just doing an open thing in the C-N zone for just this -- these three parcels in here. We want to limit. ~' ~~ O'Brien: I don't know how we could do that. _ Moe: Well, let me ask --okay. I'll ask counsel and then -- can there be, basically, a DR ~~ ' put on that to take care of it? -;~~; ~~,~ Baird: Mr. Chair, Members of the Commission, with regard to the Comprehensive Plan amendment, you can't put qualifications on that, but as each property comes in with the ., ~; annexation and zoning, I do believe that this staff has recommended the development agreement come with this and that's where you would put that. You can get as specific as you want. You can make it right down to this particular proposal, this particular owner, if the project should change hands or another use it would require them to come back in and modify the development, so it's the annexation and zoning where you can ` get specific as to the use and if I have forgotten anything you might check with planning ~ ~ ~ staff as well, but I think they have already worked out those details. Friedman: Yeah. Mr. Chairman, Commission Members, Ted's exactly right and -- and, again, just because we have these overlapping applications tonight, the annexation and the zoning for the Goff property is specific for the C-N zoning. The other two properties, which are currently in the city, will remain as they are currently zoned it's just that they ~~~° , -- should you vote for approval their Comprehensive Plan land use designation will change. So, really, the action you might be taking in approving this application would '°' ~ be if you choose to limit the use of the property would just be on the one parcel that was ~, owned by -- that's represented by Mr. Goff. Moe: Okay. . ~: ~` ~ Newton-Huckabay: But we are changing the land use designation on all three parcels. ~;~~ ~, ~a:1~ ~: Friedman: That's correct. And, then, the other two parcels in the future, as their plans and owners change, should they choose to do something different, then, they would process a rezone application consistent with the commercial designation. So, they would be back before you with a rezone application on those two parcels. The action tonight, should you -- should you approve the Comprehensive Plan amendment, will not change the zoning on those other two, they will still remain with the residential zoning, ~~' it's just that their land use designation will change and, then, they have an opportunity in the future to apply for or be considered for another type of commercial zoning. a }-~ i .,. ,. Newton-Huckabay: Fair enough. Moe: Thank you very much, Pete. Then having said all that -- ` ; : Newton-Huckabay: Mr. Chair? : ~~ ,;, ~, ~'~ :#T ~~~ ~9~ ~; f.~ .t, ~ - i. ~ - _ _ piY~~.. 1 ~ ~ !. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 14 of 32 Moe: Commissioner Newton-Huckabay. Newton-Huckabay: I recommend we close the public hearing on 09-003 -- or am I continuing it to the end of the meeting? Moe: Well, the public hearing you can close and then -- Newton-Huckabay: Okay. Moe: -- just postpone action on it. Newton-Huckabay: And AZ 09-001. Marshall: Second. Moe: Did you ask for the postponement as well? Newton-Huckabay: No. I closed the public hearing. Moe: I'm song about that. It's been moved and seconded to close the public hearing on the CPA 09-003 and AZ 09-001. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? That motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Newton-Huckabay: Mr. Chair, I recommend we postpone action on CPA 09-003 and AZ 09-001 until the end of the meeting in the event that one of the other Comprehensive Plan amendments before us may have to be continued to a later date. Marshall: Second. Moe: It's been moved and seconded to postpone action until the end of the meeting on CPA 09-003 and AZ 09-001. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? That motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 9: Public Hearing: CPA 08-012 Request to add 54.9 acres of land to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map with designations of "Public/Quasi Public" and "Low Density Residential" for River Planning Area by City of Meridian Planning Department: Moe: At this time I'd like to open the public hearing on CPA 08-012 for River Planning Area and ask for the staff report. ~~~; ~~~. :i ^,;4{ ;yi c ~ rr ~x }Y ~` jz ~, ~ =n .N. ~~ ;< s; ~,.~,. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 15 of 32 Hood: Mr. Chair, Members of the Commission, my pleasure to be in front of you again this evening. This is the second CPA map amendment on your agenda this evening and this map amendment is located on the north and south sides of Duck Alley, which doesn't show up very well on the overhead map, but it bisects that property and goes back out to Linder Road, so that's the beginnings of Duck Alley and, then, it continues to the west and currently terminates approximately middle part of this -- this property. And the subject site is on the south side of the south channel of the Boise River. It's approximately a half mile west of Linder Road. The city is the applicant on this application and has initiated it. The request is based on these parcels kind of being an outlier from the previous Comp Plan amendment for the Phyllis Canal, which has been I think a little over a year now since that -- those properties were added. They show up pretty well on -- on this existing map. Everything in green here is currently on the City of Meridian's map and, then, these parcels -- subject parcels tonight were left off of that application. You may recall that application was put together by the property owners in this area. At that time that petition was not signed by these property owners. Since this area has been added to the City of Meridian's map. We thought it made the most since for planning for Eagle, who is on the other side of the Boise River and Meridian to have this subject area be part of Meridian as well. Again, just for servicing purposes, having an enclave of Eagle at the far north end of Meridian didn't seem to make sense, so -- Mr. Friedman had a meeting and invited those property owners and city of Eagle staff to the meeting to discuss this application and subsequently submitted the application. So, there are approximately 55 acres in the subject area that we are proposing to add and there are two designations that follow on this -- on this project. You all can see my pointer, right? Okay. So, the two designations are public/quasi-public, which would be everything that's within the FEMA designated floodway, and low density residential, which would be everything that's outside of the floodway of the Boise River. As you may or may not recall, our Comprehensive Plan is not an exact guide when it comes to property lines and designations as such. So, this line can float somewhat along there. The main reason -- so, if the floodway ever changes, our designation would, essentially, change with it. The main intent is to have anything that's in the floodway or the channel of the Boise River to be, essentially, not developed with anything due to flooding concerns. Even areas as we get into different floodplains, standards could change over time and this designation allows for some -- some residential, just not quite sure how much may be appropriate, so we will have to evaluate that as we see application in the future for annexation into the City of Meridian. So, the two designations on the floodway line, which approximately does this number. It hugs pretty closely to property lines there and, then, it clips this. So, basically, all this is -- has low density residential designation proposed. This larger trunk here and, then, a small comer of this are also in the current floodway and are proposed to be public/quasi-public. Just a point of clarification, too. The city limits are quite a ways away on this. You can see part of the Tree Farm has annexed. All of this is the Tree Farm. You can see some of the city's. But there are still quite a few properties in between. We don't anticipate this area to develop anytime soon and we aren't proposing to annex those properties at this time. They aren't eligible. They aren't contiguous and there isn't a plan if you want to annex them. Also, regarding along the same lines and the sewer service to those properties we have talked about and have a preliminary plan to serve this area, but we don't have ~j~ rC ~ j .-J +L ~~~, ~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 16 of 32 ~ any detailed plans on when and how that's going to happen. JUB has actually been y> hired by the Public Works Department to investigate that further, see how much capacity we actually have at the sewer treatment plant and that will tell us exactly or ,::fib ; `' roughly how many dwelling units we can anticipate in this part of the city. So, that will have to be clear that we haven't -- we don't have a master plan to provide service to these folks, but we are evaluating how that will work in the future as development approaches this part of town, so -- as you might imagine, this -- this area is rural in nature. There is at least one home on the properties out there. I have not driving it ` myself, but I have looked at aerials. I know that there are quite a few folks that use it for rt t e s o smen p ype activities, walking, hiking, fishing, hunting and the like. So, it still has a "`i `! rural character. All of the properties out there are zoned RUT in Ada County currently. ~r.~ would say that I wouldn't say that there are any outstanding issues with this application. I have talked to a few of those property owners now and Rodney Wells, who is a property owner right here did write a letter and submitted it as part of the record and he is concemed about the current use of this property. Again, he's one of those that uses it _ to hunt and fish from and is going to invest a little bit more in some wildlife habitat on his '~ ~` area and wants to continue that use and is letting the city know that he doesn't have any ~ ~;~ plans to develop, but he does have plans to -- and plans to continue to use his property ~~ ~ in that manner and is somewhat concemed about residential being constructed right up . k~ to it as those hunting and residential doesn't seem to be a good match, at least side by side match. So, I think we can talk quite a bit about that and we will certainly include him in any development applications that he has as we approach the land with that. '° did also talk with Scott Bishop this afternoon. He's a property owner that owns approximately half of this area. He owns the two parcels here. Actually, I think there is ,~ ~ three parcels -- these three parcels here. He -- he hadn't spent a lot of time evaluating ~- it. Not to put words in his mouth, but he didn't -- he couldn't think of anything off the top ~ ^~; of his head that would be overly concerning to him. He may be in the audience tonight, ~~ ~ but we did have that discussion later this afternoon. He also uses his property for some hunting, so just to keep that in mind. Again, we kind of are viewing this as somewhat of a clean up -- oh, maybe another point that's in the staff report that I should make. On December 17th the Ada County Board of County Commissioners actually approved the city's request to include this within the city's area of impact. So, this area is already ~~~ included in our area of impact. We are kind of retrofitting our future land use map to ~' ~E also add this to our map and designate it for land uses. So, we have been kind of all r ~~, -~ over the place with those. Sometimes they go hand in hand; sometimes we add them to our map before the county approves them. In this case the county approved it before adding it to our map. But we are working in conjunction to clean that up. So, I think that's all I had. With that I will stand for any questions you may have. ;: ~ Moe: Any questions? r~? „ ; ~ Marshall: I don't. ;~ Fr ,~ Moe: Thank you. Well, that was the applicant, so, therefore, there is no one signed up to speak. Is there anyone in the in the audience that would like to, please, come up, ;. state your name and address. ~,; w ~_ ~,: r +~,-'~, at :.... ::- :;; ~ 'r'~": .__ , ..- .., •` ~~j T"'~' ::YG! Y ,ryy F 1: ,~ ~: > :.. ;. .;r~; ?r~yt: Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 17 of 32 Timmons: My name is Jerry Timmons. I live at 2228 West Duck Alley. I'm a property owner there. I have 13.2 acres there. And I was wondering what you considered low density. I know you said that it would depend on whether the -- the river flood plain changes or whatever. It has changed. As of last year it has changed quite a bit from FEMA and there is quite a bit more property there that's buildable. But at this time we are not interested in building or anything like that, we'd just kind of like to know what -- you know, how many residents could be put on that, you know, at this time or later on. And it's a great recreational property. We do have a lot of people hunting down through there, but it is private, it's not just open to the public, you know, we let people down through there. How is this going to affect our addresses and stuff like this because we was with an Eagle comprehensive plan and we have an Eagle address, Meridian phone number, and we pay taxes to the Star cemetery. Moe: Okay. I will --okay. Thank you very much. Any questions of this gentleman? Newton-Huckabay: I have none. Moe: Okay. Thank you very much. You will get some answers. Is there anyone else that would like to speak on this hearing? All bight. Thank you .very much. Well, now that the questions are done here and the staff -- or the applicant can answer these, then, maybe. Hood: Which hat would you like me to wear? The first -- the first question that Mr. Timmons asked on the low density designation, the range for that is zero up to three dwelling units per acre. So, that's -- that's -- the maximum density would be three. The least amount of density would be zero. So, that's the range for the low density designation. Understand you're not interested in developing now. When you -- or if you ever do, the addresses -- and I'm curious -- that's Meridian School District, too, so you have got a bunch of different folks. But I don't believe that your address would have to change. You can still be a Meridian -- citizen of Meridian and carry another address, although I would want to confirm that, I guess, with the postal service just to see what q~: happens. But that wouldn't be initiated by the city, it would be when you would propose a change or want to be a subdivision out there or something of the like or -- or Duck Alley changes in some manner and is renamed. So, there certainly wouldn't be anything -- overnight you won't see any of those changes, it would be something that you initiate and we would react like we do to any other development. Those are the couple questions that I had down. Did I miss something there? Friedman: There is one other -- one other point, Mr. Chairman, Commissioners. I think the other question was what would the allowable density be. As Caleb said, under our plan it's zero to three dwelling units per acre. However, since all we are considering is a Comprehensive Plan amendment and not an annexation, you still remain in unincorporated Ada County, so anything that you propose to do there -- say you decided you wanted to split that up, you would be governed by the RUT zoning designation, which I believe is one dwelling unit per five acres, but you would have to 'f' 1 -:'~~t t~~ ~a ~~ ~ ~ ~t FY~:; ;.'z ;,;t, ~f~ ~ -,F _- {;at: ~~~; l~fi.`. ~; r ~~ ~~ :~a ,,,t, ~i ~~~ ;~.; . Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 18 of 32 consult with them, but, again, you know, anything -- you know, any building permits or anything like that, until you annex or choose to annex will still go through Ada County. Baird: Mr. Chair? Moe: Yes. Baird: There was one -- possible one more question about the cemetery district. All districts that they are in, those boundaries would remain unchanged and they continue to pay taxes to those districts. Moe: Okay. Thank you. Newton-Huckabay: Mr. Chair? Moe: Commissioner Newton-Huckabay. Newton-Huckabay: I recommend we close the public hearing on CPA 08-012. Marshall: Second. Moe: It's been moved and seconded to close the public hearing on CPA 08-012 for River Planning Area. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? That motion carves. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Newton-Huckabay: Mr. Chair, I move we -- Moe: Postpone action. Newton-Huckabay: I'm postponing my brain, apparently. We postpone action on CPA 08-012 until the end of the meeting in anticipation of other CPA applications to be heard. Marshall: Second. Moe: It's been moved and seconded to postpone action on 08-012 until the end of the meeting. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? That motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 10: Public Hearing: CPA 08-013 Request to change the text of the Comprehensive Plan revising the name of the Mixed Use WWTP designation to Mixed Use Non-Residential for the Mixed Use Non- Residential Text by City of Meridian Planning Department: ~. ~ ., ,_ ,.: ., , ,= 4 ~# o,= ~~i Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 19 of 32 Item 11: Public Hearing: CPA 08-014 Request to re-designate approximately 265 acres from Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and Mixed Use Regional to Mixed Use Non-Residential for State Highway 69 & Amity by City of Meridian Planning Department: Moe: At this time I would like to open the public hearing on CPA 08-013 for the Mixed Use Nonresidential Text, as well as the CPA 08-014 for State Highway 69 and Amity and start with the staff report and the applicant report. Hood: Thank you, Mr. Chair, once again, and Members of the Commission. We are going to go ahead and do both of these. They do bleed together somewhat, although the text I'm going to try to highlight first and, then, touch more on the specific implications that has for the properties around the intersection of Amity and Meridian Road. Moe: Just one other note. We will act on these separately, though. They are both open now, but we will act separately. Thank you. Hood: So, the Comprehensive Plan text amendment application is to rename the Mixed Use Wastewater Treatment Plant land use designation to be called Mixed Use Nonresidential and to add a purpose statement, revised standards, and sample land uses most appropriate in this designation. So, we don't have an overall Comp Plan map reference in your tips anyways. Right now we currently have that designation of Mixed Use WWTP and it only applies to the area basically quarter of a mile around our wastewater treatment plant at Ten Mile and Ustick. We are proposing, then, to keep those same properties designated the same color on the map, but, essentially, change the text to no longer read Wastewater Treatment Plant, but read nonresidential and, then, take that designation and apply it to other areas throughout our area of impact where we believe nonresidential uses -- there should be a caveat that no new nonresident -- no new residential uses should be supported in that area. So, in a condensed way is the application. I'm going to go into a little bit more detail, because after our staff report went to print, staff had some concerns from one of the property owners that one of that -- that that would apply to. That individual was Vick Conrad, he's in the audience this evening. He represents and works for J.R. Simplot Company and we met with him to discuss some further tweaks and changes that would better represent the intent of the Mixed Use Nonresidential land use designation, at the same time giving them some -- some flexibility and some certainty both into what they could potentially do with that property -- the property they own and I'll get specific about that property here in just a second. I did prepare a memo yesterday afternoon, got it to the clerk. You may or may not have had a chance to read that yet. If you haven't had a chance, please, bear with me for one more minute and I will read it for you or at least the highlights of it. Staff is recommending that we include in your motion: These new standards as outlined in that memo, with one more additional change -- the change I'll just let you know right now, when that memo went out, did not include food service or restaurants in the list of potential future uses out there. Staff does not have any heartburn with adding those to the list of uses that may be potential or envisions in this „ , :yf~`. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 20 of 32 area. Let me jump back to the current language real quick of the Mixed Use Wastewater Treatment Plant. It currently reads now that the following standards apply to this category: Light professional office uses. Flex space uses, including light warehousing. No new residential uses will be permitted. Existing residential will be allowed to remain and expand accessory structures. Limited small scale retail uses, storage uses, and unless otherwise permitted by city adopted incentives, all developments within this designated area will require approval through Conditional Use Permit process. So, again, we have tweaked that language and kind of merged it with some of the language in our mixed use regional designation, which a vast majority of the subject properties on Amity and 69 currently have and add some of those components to the current mixed use wastewater treatment plant to make a hybrid designation. So, it's not simply just changing the name on the map from the wastewater treatment plan to nonresidential. There are some standards, a purpose statement, and a better idea of what that really means and what we are looking for out there. So, with that being said let me now read how we would like that text in Chapter 7 of the Comprehensive Plan to read. It would be Mixed Use Nonresidential and the purpose of this category is to designate areas where new residential dwelling units will not be permitted, as residential uses are not compatible with the planned uses for this area. A library of nonresidential land uses may occur in this category. Employment opportunities, professional offices, warehousing, flex buildings and storage uses, as well as retail uses are envisioned. The following standards will apply to this category and, then, a bullet point. No new residential uses will be permitted. Existing residential will be allowed to remain and expand accessory structures -- again, not the carry over from current language in the wastewater treatment plant. Retail uses and acompromise -- may comprise a maximum of 50 percent of a development area. That one is from the mixed use regional designation. As you may recall, I just read in the wastewater treatment plant it said limited small scale retail. So, that -- that's more from the mixed use regional designation. And, then, the third bullet is there is neither a minimum nor a maximum imposed on nonretail commercial uses, such as office, industry, food services slash restaurants or warehouse uses -- warehouse uses. And that one's kind of a compilation, again, of several things out of both categories, out of the mixed use regional, as well as the wastewater treatment plant designation. And the final bullet point: All developments shall have a mix of at least two types of land uses. So, they are looking to -- we focused a lot on the last part of that, the nonresidential, but, really, the mixed use component we want to see these developments have a mix of uses as well. And, then, finally, to read into Chapter 7: Some sample uses include employment centers, professional offices, flex buildings, warehousing, industry, storage facility, and retail. That does not mean that that's the only uses that we anticipate out there, it's just a sample use, gives you a flavor of the types of uses that we are looking for out there. Certainly there are several uses out there and when -- when somebody would come in for annexation and zoning we will evaluate the use and the zoning based on these polices and the Comprehensive Plan and the UDC, surrounding area, and our public input, the whole line. But that just kind of hopefully gives someone that is looking at this area a flavor of what the city is looking for in the future. So, I think that clarifies. I wish we would have had maybe some of this discussion a week ago, so I could have got all this in the staff report and wouldn't have to be just reading it in for you, but such is life ~_, ~;~: i~~~ +: -- :. ilk -r:- ,~ ~. :'~, l Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 21 of 32 and I think it's worked out, I think we have a compromise that isn't necessarily a compromise, I think it fits the city better and I want to thank Simplot for -- and Vick s; Conrad in particular, for working with us to make our Comp Plan better than what we ` had originally proposed. So, I think that's all I have. Oh, I did also want to let you know, ` ~; we did talk with -- two more things. I need to highlight a little bit on the -- that's it for the { ~ text portion of it, so let me talk about the map portion of it, since they are both open. I almost forgot we had both of those open. So, the map amendment, then, application applies to areas on the map located at the northeast and southeast corners of Amity and State Highway 69. There are approximately 211 acres of land that the city is proposing to change the Comprehensive Plan future land use designation from low .:<<; density residential, medium density residential and mixed use regional, to have it all be ~ti' designated mixed use nonresidential. There are eight different property owners. They ~ are all zoned in the county. Some of them have RUT zoning and some of them have R- ~ ~ 1 zoning. It doesn't necessarily show up very well on either one of those maps, but most of them are zone RUT, with a couple of R-1 parcels. The city did coordinate with the current land owners and initiated -- the city has initiated the CPA on -- on the subject property. Again, I don't want to jump back into the text stuff, but that's one of the reasons that we made the text changes, so we could apply it to this area in particular. ~` ~~ Similar to the -- the last application we are not proposing any changes to zoning or ' annexing any of these properties or any development, it will all be initiated by the private ~ ~,.~~~ ~ communit or rivate ro ert owners, we are ust ro osin to chan a the desi nation Y p p P Y 1 p p 9 9 9 on our map to reflect this revised designation. Currently a majority of the subject properties are operating with similarly allowed uses in the proposed mixed use nonresidential designation and/or are vacant. There are two homes, though, that are -- property lines don't show up there on that one. Let's look at this one. There are two ~' ~; homes that are on both of these properties here. One of those property owners, Patricia Rabel, showed up to our neighborhood meeting, coordination, kick-off meeting, whatever you want to call it, and -- and did not express any concerns at that time to { ~:~'~ Matt, the one that held that -- he was the staff member that or anized th t ti d ~; g a mee ng an held it. I have not heard from the adjacent -- her adjacent property owner neighbor on z ~ ; that application, but I did want to point out there are currently two -- two residential units out there. They are fine. The text says no new residential, so -- let's see. So, staff believes that the subject area is one of those areas suitable for the Mixed Use ~` ~p `S Nonresidential land use designation. In view of the current operations occurring and anticipated nature of redevelopment, the aerial may be the best at explaining currently *~; what's out there, the part that's out here being filled in or has been somewhat filled in. ~'; ` ~ ~ haven't been out there recently. And, then, the storage -- old chicken coup storage facility, Simplot owns. It's over the 94 acres that we are proposing to change here. can't remember exactly what the land holding is. We have got American Paving's operations. ACHD does some other extraction and their operations on a large portion of ~~ this property, too. So, I mean you can see it pretty -- it's also pretty heavy industrial, but ,~~ ~; ~ certainly residential uses aren't a very good fit in what's currently out there. In the ~~ couple of conversations we have had with Simplot and -- my take on it is they are just ~~~ :;_; trying to keep all options open, which I can t fault them for doin that. But the other folks 9 ~ that I have talked about potential redevelopment of their properties are looking at " something real similar, you know, something along the lines of a contractor's yard or ,,~, -. ,.,; . 6~~~ -_ ~; ,, -~a• '~ _,; ~~; Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 22 of 32 pretty heavy industrial type redevelopment. No one's really approached us with doing retail or office or, you know, some of those traditional stuff. So, I think that the flavor that's out there will improve over time I would hope, but it certainly has an industrial type of flavor to it now. We don't envision that changing too terribly much, so -- we did receive a verbal confirmation from the Ewing Company in support of the proposed land use change. They were one of the ones that were not at our -- well, when we held our kick-off meeting some additional -- this property was not part of the application at the time. After further discussions staff decided it did make sense to include three additional parcels or two and a half additional parcels all owned by the same property owner, which the Ewing company has since acquired and I called them and said, hey, we are -- we are proposing this change from low density to this mixed use nonresidential, do you have a problem with that and they are on board with it and support the application. So, this four and a half acres, approximately -- and, again, it cuts off -- cuts off the back side of one of those parcels, but it makes a straight line south there and that wasn't part of the original application. But those folks -- the additional folks were noticed within the 300 feet and were somewhat late add, but that additional area is also part of the subject map change and like I mentioned, we have worked with the Simplot company about changing their designation from this mixed use regional to mixed use nonresidential and they are on board, but, again, Vick's in the audience this evening and I won't try to put words in his mouth. But with that staff would ask that you act favorably on both of these applications and I will stand for any questions you may have. Moe: Any questions of staff at the present time? O'Brien: Mr. Chairman, I have a question of Caleb. Moe: Mr. O'Brien. O'Brien: On that property that -- those two, two and a half parcels that -- that are being acquired by American Gravel or is this being designated the -- could possibly sell that off to American Gravel for further excavation of the gravel pit, in which case I think it would -- it would want to notify people more in the whole area, because of the noise issues. ,r 4~~. Hood: Mr. Chair, Commissioner O'Brien, American Paving is at the hard comer of State Highway 69, Amity. The subject parcels -- get to maybe something that's a little bit closer -- do not abut that property. It's not directly adjacent. I have not heard any intentions of American Paving acquiring that property, so if -- if that's the case I have not heard any rumblings about that. O'Brien: I thought they moved their pit to a little further east and southeast of their existing pits, of which they have been reclaiming over a period of time and recently have stopped in the last couple of years, but I just wondered if that was in the evolution that they might acquire more land and I know they have asked in the past to do that, but I don't know what the -- ,, . ~_ _. :~ - , _. ~ . z- ,. :Y~ ~,.:~~ '"9 c -: <Z u >> f ~°: ';a* ; -~~- t,, ~ ;~ ~_ ~~~. ;F~'t ~, ~~~' 3~~; :;: , , ~ `,r ;: ~~. h=:; ~~: r,.s„ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 23 of 32 Newton-Huckabay: Mr. Chair? Moe: Commissioner Newton-Huckabay. Newton-Huckabay: Commissioner O'Brien, I think, again, this is just a map designation. I don't think that that applies to that -- your concems. It would have to come back through, if there was any kind of rezoning or anything like that and so designating it as a mixed use nonresidential doesn't give -- give them any -- any presumed right until they are annexed to do anything. O'Brien: Okay. I agree with that. Okay. That makes sense. Newton-Huckabay: I think that although valid concerns and points, I don't think that it's going to do us any good to discuss them here right now, but -- O'Brien: Fine. Thank you. Moe: Any other questions? Okay. There is one person signed up, Vick Conrad. And, again, if you would state your name and address for the record, I'd appreciate it. Conrad: My name is Vick Conrad. I work for the J.R. Simplot Company. Our address is 999 Main Street, Boise, Idaho. 83702. I got to start out with a question and a request. When preparing our comments I have submitted them in connection with application number CPA dash 014 and because we are hearing them together, but have decided to vote on them separately, I would request that also a copy of those comments be submitted in connection with CPA dash 013 as well. Moe: I think that can be done. Conrad: Okay. After submitting our comments last week, I met with Matt and Caleb to discuss the resolution to the concems that I expressed in our letter and after that meeting Caleb provided a revision to the proposed land use description, which is the version that Caleb just described. We find that this proposal is acceptable and I want to thank the planning staff especially, Matt, Caleb, and Anna, for taking our comments into consideration. We appreciate the level of courtesy service and professionalism in how they conducted this matter and thank you very much. Moe: Thank you very much. Again, that was the only one signed up. If there is anyone else that would like to come forward, please do. Ewing: Commissioners, Tuck Ewing, 1500 EI Dorado, Boise. I'm representing the Tico One parcel or it was referred to as the Ewing Company parcel. I guess, just a clarification, it's that southern piece, the five -- four, five, six acre piece there, just for clarification, to kind of answer the questions I heard there. There is no rumbling about selling to American Paving. We do now own that parcel. At the time when some of this ;:: t ~n ~~~•~ ~. N~ - -z_, ti -~-~ F'r~ `, ~T .-~; ;~: , ~;~~: ~: ~; ~~ ,, ~t ° ~y -~,; Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 24 of 32 discussion was coming through we had it just optioned. Since, then, we have acquired it, but we are in full support and as Caleb stated, would like to be included in this new designation. So, with that any questions? Moe: Okay. Newton-Huckabay: I have none. Moe: Thank you very much. Is there anyone else that would like to speak to this? Okay. There were no more questions of staff on that either, so, Commissioners, any comments, questions? I, myself, think that the change is a good one. No problem whatsoever with this. It's kind of nice that some of the folks that it's affecting have already come in and said they are very much in approval of it and I would love to see this even take -- take off and something happen to it sooner rather than later, but that's just me. Newton-Huckabay: My only comment is that I -- that I hope that this change in text and clarification resolves what would seem to be an ongoing issue around wastewater treatment plant area planning. This has always has been a very political -- that sure give you a lot of headaches. So, I'm hoping that that will resolve that issue for us to move forward on that, but -- and I think it's -- I have -- I don't think any of it's unreasonable, so I'm good. d Moe: Okay. Marshall: Mr. Chair, I do have one question for you. ~{=f ::. ~;; ,;; r ~: "~.~; +~°, ~~` ~;: ,~: ,.y ~~ ~~3 ~., Moe: Yes, sir. Marshall: Even though we are going to act on these separately, can we close the public hearing on both? Moe: Yes, I opened them up that way, so yes. Marshall: Mr. Chair, I move that we close the public hearing on CPA 08-013 and CPA 08-014. Newton-Huckabay: Second. ~~~ Moe: It's been moved and seconded to close the public hearing on CPA 08-013 and '" ` CPA 08-014. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? That motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Moe: And since we are on -- you know, that would be the first one that we would be working our way back through. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 25 of 32 Marshall: Mr. Chair, to clarify, we are going to work backwards up through? Moe: Basically -- well, basically, we will go ahead and act on 10, 11, then, we will go back up and take care of the -- Newton-Huckabay: Seven, eight and nine. Moe: -- seven and eight and, then, nine. Okay? So, having said that, is there someone that would just love to make a motion, other than myself? Newton-Huckabay: Do you want me to do it, Commissioner Marshall? Marshall: I'm trying to get there. Give me second. Newton-Huckabay: Okay. Marshall: We need to include in that the new text as well; is that correct? So, should I read that for the record as part of the motion? Hood: Mr. Chair, Commissioner Marshall, I don't think you need to read -- if you can just reference the memo with the add or the restaurant and food services that wasn't in the memo, if you could just make that clarification, but -- unless you see something else that needs to be changed, just to reference that memo -- Marshall: Other than the slash restaurant wasn't in there. You want to add the slash restaurant to the food services. ~ Hood: That's the proposal from staff. Marshall: The second one didn't have slash restaurant. And that's the memo dated February 19th. Getting there. Mr. Chair, after considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to recommend approval to City Council of file number CPA 08-013, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of February 19th, 2009, with the following comments: To reference the new text on the memorandum dated February 18th, 2009, received February 19th, 2009, restating the Chapter 7, page 103 text, to include lodging and food services slash restaurants on the fourth bullet. Moe: No. Newton-Huckabay: Not to include lodging. N;;: ~4f~i.Yl ~.-~' ~ti tll. rrt, 2:;i-.~~~~,~~ ?~r'- 2_~, ,~ t ;...L ~3 ~,_ }: ` ,_, "µ`t ;;,: ~" ' .~~~, ,~~$. . •.~~; ~:a ~~,~ 5 :~; ~w~ ?cf ~~s~:: ~ ;, Meridian Planning 8 Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 26 of 32 Marshall: End of motion. O'Brien: Second. Moe: It's been moved and seconded to send onto City Council approving CPA 08-013 for Mixed Use Nonresidential text as noted. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? That motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Marshall: Eleven. Mr. Chair? Moe: Mr. Marshall. Marshall: After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to recommend approval to the City Council of file number CPA 08-014 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of February 19th, 2009, with no further comments. Moe: I thought we were noting that same information. Marshall: Oh, do I have to note the same information on this one as well? Moe: Yes. Baird: Mr. Chair, I would think you don't need to, because what it's doing is incorporating what you just recommended in 08-013. Moe: Okay. I follow you. Okay. I'm sorry. Okay. O'Brien: End of motion? Second. Moe: All right. It's been moved and seconded to approve to City Council CPA 08-014. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? That motion carries. <;; MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 9: Public Hearing: CPA 08-012 Request to add 54.9 acres of land to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map with designations of "Public/Quasi Public" and "Low Density Residential" for River Planning Area by City of Meridian Planning Department: Marshall: Mr. Chair, after considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to recommend approval to City Council of file number CPA 08-012 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of February 19th, 2009, with no comments. .~ r 3y.. ,._ r.' ,. 1., _ _~,, ,; x ~:t5.--. '° Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 ;' .>~.: Page 27 of 32 ``'~ Moe: Would you -- 08-012 is what you -- t ~ `~ Marshall: 012. Yes. Moe: Okay. That's fine. ~° r~ Marshall: Thank you. Moe: Second. ,.~;~ rJ r ..:C,S'~ , . ' Moe: It's been moved and seconded to approve -- send onto City Council requesting approval of CPA 08-012 for River Planning Area. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? That motion carries. .~,~; MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. .~ ;~ ~ Item 7: Public Hearing: CPA 09-003 Request to change the Comprehensive R ~" '~ Plan Future Land Use Map designation on 2.051 acres of land from "medium density residential" to "commercial" for Goff by Garland Goff and Shannon Hamrick - 1665, 1705 and 1725 W. Pine Avenue: ~ Moe: Now, we are going up. Okay. ~~~; ~`~`" Marshall: And, Mr. Chair, I assume we want to do CPA 09-003 before the AZ. ~, .", Moe: Yes. That's what I'm waiting on. :.t _ Marshall: Okay. Mr. Chair, after considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, move to recommend approval to the City Council of file number CPA 09-003 as ~~ a4 presented in the staff report for the hearing date of February 19th, 2009, with no further ~`'~~' comments. ;~ ;_ ~ ~~~. -~ O'Brien: Second. y Moe: It's been moved and seconded to approve CPA 08-003. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? That motion carries. II ~h1, J i' MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 8: Public Hearing: AZ 09-001 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 0.76 ~~ "4~ . of an acre of land with a C-N zoning district for Goff by Garland Goff and Shannon Hamrick -1725 W. Pine Avenue: Newton-Huckabay: Commissioner Marshall, this is going to be a motion record for you think. _,.~_ ~.v ~r ~~ +x - .. ~~~}: ri~+ . . ,;~. ~ 7~~, , . i :<, ,. ` . .rte ~'..' .~ ,., ... ai s. ., '. .. - :~~x' u ;~~ w r ~ "~~ Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission ,.,:,~ , February 19, 2009 '' Page 28 of 32 ; z, = Moe: And you're doing a great job. ;.: Marshall: Okay. Mr. Chair, after considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, move to recommend approval to the City Council of file number AZ 09-001 as presented ~ " in the staff report for the hearing date of February 19th, 2009. y, ~ ~ ~ ~i Moe: Is there any discussion or wanting to limit the use of the property? O'Brien: Development agreement. >: Moe: You're the maker of the motion, so -- ,~ Marshall: I was not going to -- I thought we were covering that in the development agreement, so to be -- ' ' Moe: Okay. ~ Newton-Huckabay: I think the -- Mr. Chair, the concern we have that we would make `~ that directive is a portion of the development agreement through this motion and we need to decide as a Commission do we want to limit the use on that to an aquatics ~¢ fitness center only or do we want to exclude specific uses allowed in the C-N zone as part of the development agreement. Did I get it? Yeah. ~;t Marshall: So, just to reference it as an aquatics facility only would -- =~~< Newton-Huckabay: I think it would severely -- ::;;~~~ _ ~} Marshall: Limit anything that could be on that. ~: Moe: -- and we are only talking about this parcel only at the present time. Marshall: Right. ,~-t ~~' Friedman: Mr. President, Commissioners, if I may help shed a little light on your '~-~ discussion here. Under the proposed recommendations from the staff -- and ou ~~ ~ y may wish to amend it -- one of the first conditions that we have recommended placing on the development agreement is future development of the site substantially comply with the conceptual development plan and building elevations included in the exhibits and the design standards currently in effect at the time of zoning application -- certificate of zoning application is applied for. You could amend that and say further the use of the site may well be restricted to the swim training facility or swim training facility and any ~- other of the ermitted or conditional uses ou think are a p y ppropriate in the C-N zone or `"~ you could limit it to what they are proposing without having to sit here and go through «;~.~ ,~~; < every single permitted and conditional use in the C-N zone. That's your choice. ,~r ~ Marshall: But any other uses still have to come back for reapplication. ~ t µxl ` ~" ~U is , :,f.. - ~~ .... .. 5+, _ .. - .. r - ... .. .. -9 kt~t.._ - ,k _ _ _ 'f Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission ~„~ February 19, 2009 °~: Page 29 of 32 ' Friedman: It would have to come back for a development agreement modification. ~~' That's correct. ~, Marshall: Personally, not wanting to limit them as to exactly what they can do with their ~- facilities, because they are trying to expand offerings to the public and I would not want ;~; ~ to specifically exclude something that I may not have thought of, I would choose to '~~~ leave that to the development agreement as it stands. So, I'm going to pass forward ~. ~ ;;~~ with no comments. Moe: Go ahead and restate that, please. ' Marshall: After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to ~ ~~ recommend approval to the City Council of file number CPA -- oh, excuse me, we have 4~- already passed that. Of AZ 09-001, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of February 19th, 2009, with no comments. y ~ Moe: Is there a second? Newton-Huckabay: No. ;;. ~ Moe: Hearing no second, so that motion fails. .. . r" Newton-Huckabay: I don't think -- I think we are all thinking the same thing, but not `~` ` articulating what it is -- I don't think by limiting it on this application to the use of an aquatic fitness center -- I think what we are saying is that the applicant can't build ~ something else there that's allowed in the C-N zone. ; Marshall: Well, right now the way I understand the development agreement that they '~ ~~. wouldn't be able to build anything else but what they have proposed at this time. Y r~~ Newton-Huckabay: There is no development agreement yet. ':.1 ;~ Marshall: As written by the city as a part of this. 3 ~ Newton-Huckabay: It isn't an enforceable -- ., r ~'~' Friedman: Right. Mr. Chairrr~an, Commissioners, really, what it does is the development -- recommended development agreement condition has tied it to the site - s ~~r~'.~ ;.:_ plan and the development plan for the property and we certainly know and understand that Mr. Goff and his daughter plan to erect and operate the aquatic fitness and training facility, but without a limitation on uses, they could just as easily tum that into adrive-in restaurant. So, what you want to do is tie them -- if it's the pleasure of the Commission to limit the use of the site to the aquatic training and education facility and preclude any .~ other development that might be allowed as a permitted or conditional use in the C-N zone, then, you would probably want to add that condition to the site plan also, if that's ~~ r~~.; ,~~~: ,. _ _. 't r'~i .. .t . r _.. :7' ., ~ _ Z 1 Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 30 of 32 your pleasure and, then, in the future if the property changes hands, other conditions change and they feel that they want to embark on another venture there, they could do so through a development modification. Baird: Mr. Chair? Moe: Yes, sir. Baird: I have a question for Mr. Friedman, if I may. Moe: Yes, sir. Baird: Is the land use designation found within this zone that they fall under -- is that the indoor recreation heading? Friedman: Yeah. It's the -- Baird: Because what this Commission is used to doing, Mr. Chair, is finding the one listed category that's permitted within the land use designation and -- if it's your pleasure to state that particular name as it's listed in the code, so that does provide some flexibility within the building of similar uses. So, I'll yield to Mr. Friedman with that information if you have it. Friedman: It's the arts, entertainment, and recreation facility indoor. Baird: And if that's too broad you can limit it. Newton-Huckabay: Yeah. That is way too broad. I'm going to take a stab at a motion, Commissioner Marshall, if you don't mind. Marshall: Please. Newton-Huckabay: Commissioner O'Brien? O'Brien: Fine. Newton-Huckabay: Okay. After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to recommend approval to the City Council of file number CPA 09 -- oh. Excuse me. AZ 09-001 as presented it the staff report for the hearing date of February 19th, 2009, with the following comment that the use on the property will substantially comply with the concept plan submitted and will be limited to aquatic fitness facility as proposed by the applicant. End of motion. O'Brien: Second. r=:t. hn,_,... ~.; . ~ .: .. i V ~ ... ... ~ _ :L~. _ _. .. _. 1. 2}.~, ..X ~ ~ ~; ;:;~~. 9~ ^ x~ ~. <::,_ ~~; r zs ~, ;,~; ~~.u ~" l~h:y ~ "'} ,;~ c ~~',3: `, m ~; ~~~ r ~;M Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 31 of 32 Moe: It's been moved and seconded to approve AZ 09-001 with the modifications as noted. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? That motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 12: Public Hearing: AZ 08-016 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 36.27 acres of land from the RUT zoning district in Ada County to the M-E (Mixed Employment) zoning district in the city for Southridge 31 by James L. Jewett -northeast corner of Overland Road and Ten Mile Road: Moe: At this time I would like to open the public hearing on AZ 08-016 for the sole purpose of continuing the hearing to the regularly scheduled meeting of March 5th. Can I get a motion? Newton-Huckabay: So moved. O'Brien: Second. Moe: It's been moved and seconded to continue AZ 08-016 to the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission March the 5th. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? That motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Moe: I would like one more motion. O'Brien: Mr. Chair, move to adjourn. Newton-Huckabay: Second. Moe: It's been moved and seconded to adjourn. All those in favor say aye. Opposed? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Moe: We adjourn at 8:38. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:38 P.M. ~~;.,- '+ . ,~ -f;', ,, r` ,~~ ;; ~~4 •~: 14 ~, ~; ~, ~.;;:, ~J ~~ :~: t ,; y: Yk'"': ty :y',. Meridian Planning 8 Zoning Commission February 19, 2009 Page 32 of 32 (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS.) D: °~ ~ ~~ O~ DAVID MOE - C AIRMAN DATE APPROVED ATTEST: JAYCEE L. HOLMAN, CIT` '~1 y ~m3~HL o ~ ~ ... ti ~,~ (sST 1st' ~O ~~TY , \O