The URL can be used to link to this page

Saguaro Canyon No 2 Swimming Pool CZC 05-130,~~-~nl- n~G ~~ ~~ 4~. ~'t~ CITY QF ~~`"'. .- ~ ~ \i~ ~YlG~1G>Eyl ll IDAHO ,h " a rct~5utcn "- SINCE 1903 CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE Date: December 19.2005 Project Name/Number: Sa~,uaro Canyon No. 2 Swimming Pool - CZC-OS-130 Owner: Farwest, LLC Site Address: Lot 2, Block 19 Saguaro Canyon Subdivision No. 2 Proposed Use: Swimming Pool and Restroom/MechanicaUStora~e Buildings Zoning: R-4 Comments: Conditions of Approval: Project is subject to all current City of Meridian ordinances and the Development Agreement (Inst. No. 104089430) on this property. The issuance ofthis permit does not release the applicant from any previous requirements ofthe other permits issued for this site (see AZ-03-027, PP-03-032, CUP-03- 058, and FP-OS-028). Landscaping: The Landscape Plan prepared by The Land Group, Inc. on September 27, 2005, labeled Sheet LS-1, is approved (stamped "Approved" on December 19, 2005 by the Meridian Planning Department) with no changes. The approved landscape plan is not to be altered without prior written approval of the Planning Department. No field changes to landscape plan permitted; prior written- approval of all material changes is required.:. __ Site-Plan: Tlie SitePlan prepared by Glancey Rockwell Associates on September 28, 2005, labeled SheetA= 0.1 is approved (stamped "Approved" on October 18, 2005 by the Meridian Planning Department) with the following change: UDC 11-3 C-5 requires that drive aisles adjacent to 90 degree parking stalls shall be 25 feet in width. The drive aisle adjacent to the parking shown near E. Joshua Tree Drive shall be 25 feet in width. Irrigation: An underground, pressurized irrigation system must be installed to all landscape areas per the approved specifications and in accordance with UDC 11-3A-15. Protection of Existing Trees: Any existing trees on site must be protected or mitigated for in accordance with the' Tree Preservation section of the City's Landscape Ordinance. Per UDC 11-3B-10, coordinate with the Parks Department Arborist (Elroy Huff, 888-3579) for approval of protection/relocation measures for any existing trees prior to construction. Any severer damaged tree must be replaced in compliance with UDC 11- 3B-10-C.~. Parkin: The proposed parking areas shall be paved and striped in accordance with UDC 11-3B. Project engineer/architect shall certify that the number and size of handicap-accessible spaces conforms to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Handicap accessible stalls must have signage in accordance per ADA and signed "Van Accessible". Curbing: Per UDC 11-3B-SI, all landscape areas adjacent to driveways, parking lots, or other vehicle use areas, must be protected by curbing, wheel stops, or other approved protective devices. Curbing may be cut to allow for storm water runoff. Sidewalks: All sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with 11-3A-17. Sidewalks shall be constructed prior to occupancy. Drainage: Storm water drainage swales shall not have a slope steeper than 3:1, shall be fully vegetated, and shall be designed in compliance with UDC 11-3B-11 and UDC 11-3A-18. Fencing: Any required or proposed fencing shall be installed with current fencing standards as defined in UDC 11-3A-7. NOTE: Specific fencing requirements are required for the west and north boundaries of this site. Li tin :Lighting shall not cause glare or impact the traveling public or neighboring development and comply with lighting standards as defined in UDC 11-3A-11. Si~-riage: No signs are approved with this CZC. All business signs will require a separate sign permit in compliance with UDC 11-3D. Trash Enclosure: Any dumpster(s) must be screened in accordance with UDC-11-3A-12. Trash enclosures must be built in the location and to the size approved by SSC. SSC has required that the trash cart be placed at the Carol Street curb for this property. Handicap-Accessibility: The structure, site improvements and parking must be in compliance with all federal handicap-accessibility requirements. ACRD Acceptance: All impact fees, if any, shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. If any changes must be made to the site plan to accommodate the ACHD requirements, a new site plan shall be submitted to the City of Meridian Planning staff for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. Certificate of Occupancy: All required improvements must be complete prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. A written certificate of completion shall be prepared by the landscape architect, landscape designer or qualified nurseryman responsible for the landscape plan upon completion ofthe landscape installation. The Certificate of Completion shall verify that all landscape improvements, including plant materials and sprinkler installation, are in substantial compliance with the approved landscape plan. A Temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be obtained by providing surety to the City in the form of a Letter of Credit or cash in the amount of 110% of the cost of the remaining improvements. A bid must accompany any request for Temporary Occupancy. ' Plan Modifications: Except for the changes mentioned above, the approved Site Plan, Landscape-Plan stamped "Approved" on December 19, 2005, and Elevations, and are not to be altered without prior written approval of the Planning Department. No significant field changes to the site or landscape plans are permitted; prior written approval of all changes is required. C',~-~ h Wilson ssociate City Planner *This letter does not indicate compliance with requirements of other departments/agencies, including, but not limited to, Ada County High~~ay District, Central District Health Department, affected irrigation district(s), Meridian Serer, Water, Building or Fire Departments, Sanitary Services Co., etc. This letter shall expire one (1) year from the date of issuance if work has not begun. d t .`,i'~~. ..~ C.I f ~' nF ji ~ti1'F~~i C~ri~ian-'~_ ~ .,,,, ,~ ~~,, `G14 7wyvAA• ~~'V-•1 _ - 191 ~~w~/ Type of Review Requested (check all that appty) ^ Accessory Use ^ Administrative Design Review ^ Alternative Compliance Certificate of Zoning Compliance ^ Conditional Use Permit Minor Modification ^ Property Boundary Adjustment ^ Short Plat ^ Temporary Use Certificate of Zoning Compliance O Time Extension (Director) ^ Vacation ^ Other ADMIl~iISTRATIVE REVIEW APPLICATION -STAFF USE ONLY: File Number(s): Project name: Date filed: Date complete: Assigned Planner: Concurrent filesi Previous files: Applicant Information Applicant name: _/'/1 rU'"~( ~i-~- Applicant address: ~~g~ ~ • Qf ~'E~ S~- ~~ Z Contact name: TI/ S T/~V ~'y1 G}{L~J'/U Applicant's interest in property: ,~Qwn ^ Rent ^ Optioned ^ Other Owner name: / / ~/ L/ Owner address: `7 y~ ti ~2~~~ ~I~ p~' ,-~~, ZiP~ +~/ Agent name (e.g., architect, engineer, developer, representative): ~Eti / TTV ~ ~`S Firm name: ~L~/65 C'y~ ~'~~/ ~V v ~ ~ Svc . Address: ~~ ~• -OT~~~~L~Q ~/'S~ Contact name: BE%~> / l/ ~ ~""~ Primary co~nta~ct,,is~•^- E-mail: U Planning Department ^ Owner Agent ^ Other Subject Property Information Zip: ~1~3 7"t `9 Phone: ,~ ~~ Zip: 'g ~ ~// 9~ Phone: 3 7 T / ~ . CDl~tn Fax: 3y,~ ZIf D Location/street address: l ~'~yA~ZO ~NYoti ND Z Assessor's parcel number(s): ~ Z ~~~ I-L Township, range, section: ~C .30 % yN 2 ~ E Total acreage: 2%Ss~ Current land use: OPT/) ~~~-~ Current zoning district: 2-~ ' 660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 202 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6678 • Website: www.meridiancity.orQ 1 Project Description Projectlsubdivision name: SA' Vii'(ZD (~/hV y0N 117D. Z Lt~r Z ~(~K ~9 General description of proposed project/request: ~~~ST~~.T S /,v~1~11'Yl ~Nf' p~dL ~D - QESi 2oo~/mFZffA~~v rc~4~.~ Sro/Z,¢GE .6v/[-t~~N~S . Proposed zoning district(s): Acres of each zone proposed: Z- • S(~ Type of use proposed (check all that apply): I,,t n ^ Residential ^ Commercial ^ Office ^ IndustrialOther ~lyi wl (HIV (~ /"~~ Amenities provided with this development (if applicable): .S !.1/ ~ h'1 /til ~ tiC~ /~(h~L- Residential Project Summary (if applicable) Number of residential units: Number of building lots: Number of common and/or other lots: Proposed number of dwelling units (for multi-family developments only): 1 Bedroom: 2 or more Bedrooms: Minimum squaze footage of structure(s) (excl. garage): Proposed building height: Minimum property size (s.f): Gross density (DU/acre-toter land): Percentage of open space provided: Percentage of useable open space: Average property size (s.f.): Net density (DU/acre-excluding roads & alleys): Acreage of open space: (See Chapter 3, Article G, for qualified open space) Type of open space provided in acres (i.e., landscaping, public, common, etc): Type of dwelling(s) proposed: ^Sfngle-family ^ Townhomes ^ Duplexes ^Mulri-family Non-residential Project Summary (if applicable) Number of building lots: I Other lots: -1~- Gross floor area proposed: ~~S S ~" -~ Existing (if applicable): 1'V \ ~ Hours of operation (days and hours): g~ ~ " g P~ (R~Pf'~ox_ 1 Building height: Percentage of site/project devoted to the following: ~ Landscaping. , Building: S' Paving: ~6a Total number of employees: IV r~ Maximum number of employees at any one time: N Number and ages of students/children (if applicable): ~~ Seating capacity: N Total number of parking spaces provided: ~- Number of compact spaces provided: -~~ Anthnrizafinn Print applicant name: jL~"J~~~ /-~(~ ~ /r/A'2~ ~OLl7SiYJ/ ~ rY1 E~1 ~6E/L Applicant signature: Date: ~~~ ~ ~ 660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 202 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: (208) 884-5533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6678 • Website: www.meridiancitv.ore ~~R~~3~ e~ m~ ~o :y 8 _ Q ~ g I / " ,' ~ ® I 1 ~ I '1...` ..... I :. ~ ~' ~~::o. c l_ ~ ry]~ ~:;:;, u ..: m ~~/ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ UU 4qq~0 D DS R~ ~P~g pgA ~ ~ > ~ / ~~a. ~ .' $~~ ~a m R ~as g~ I / ~ e ~ u> ~~~~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~g~ ~ 9 ~~~~ ~ _ ~ 3 _ u / B // ~ y -I -_ fR011NOLTN[u 0. Gu.6° C9 / _ _ i GR~ ~~ XmN.M9 rr._.._ ------- I TRC9 ~~ ~E~ o ' II~ ~~°~ i 1 i ~~ - ~ ~ i~ ~~ _ _ I 1- I F r i _~r~F ~ _ ~ t'' ~ /~-T . ~ ~ ~< z Z E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ! ~ s ~~ ~~~~a ,~ ~ ~ _. _ ~.~ ~m0 ~ ~" dF~ a~~~ p: ~!~ ~~ g~m A~ ~'~ .I ~I AI a Pew nT ~_ ~ ~g z1 ~a ~~ _ ., r} ~,~ ~~~w b ~~T ~iE 91~ ~ j~lgi '; ~ I ~ ~ p~~ Ir ~~~ & II i ~ aa _ ~ ~ I -F~ypp-'r ~ 1 3~~g~. I $I~~~ I? ~ 9 ~ o >c ~ ~ q ~IoI l~. n~ I~ I i i ~I'~ ~ i ii ~ ~ i. ~ . ~ ~~i I ~ ~~ __ ~4 a~ a N D O D l _YJ ~' .~ ~rlr ~ ~ g. ~ . tl ~ ~w - mg_ q ~~4~ fi~ a~ ~ ~ ~ R ~~ 4m g ~ ~„ g . ~~ mpm~ - +F w~~ ~~i° Q ~' ; ~. aU ~. ~~~ g ~O' ~~ j/ /. r ~ ~ ~~ r ~ i / ;~~~ I ~~ am ~a~ .. .~ /. . _ ~ /j _ ~oM ~ . ~~, ;~ r ~~~~1~ ~~~~~` ' r ,r r :. // SAGUARO GANYON SUBDIVI510N N02 ~i;i. ~~~: ~RIDIAN, IDAHO LGti5TH1GTILMI ~ Il=ii+i FAt2J,E5T LLC. 4481 DkEBDEI PLAC'c 5 c. 693 j~l°;I BOLSE. ID440 Fi1?.E: (708138E-0'&: FAX (700/3'6 7011 11~ I(i / ' uu , ' ~~~ ~ ~ v, ~ . .; ~. , \ : v ,, , 1 O 'w \\ ~ a" \ ~ l ~ ~ t \ `'~ r I __ ~. / l ,. : :. ": \ \ \ ,: ~\. :~ ~ _-_ 1 I, s /. __ m u ~ ... ~ w w ~~~ rauo~a ~ \ • v \ {, bon ~ .~\ " ~ A 1 3. -' ~ \ \ \ ~\ ~ ~.. , , `. ~ ,\, ~ , ~ ,. ~ ~, ,~ n ~ ~ . , . . \,Y \ ~ \ - ', nm \ :'' - eu. .. \:~ ': ~ ~wroE .. . '` :. ~ ~m~ ~, 9 • W h ® vnx \ ~ \ 4 ~,pu 0. y Wi q `~ \ 1 ~'MA µmAn W , t V ~`1~ I r~ ale ¢arv \ \ , e0. K a ~ ,~ . L PARK GRADING pLMI 9C01E~1'. ]O'.0' BLAtE~I'. N'~d i S: ~, 1 f%'R~ ~~ .. ~`~~'~ i r r =I Za ~ ~~ ~ ~ m ~" g s ~~ ~ ~ pp op 7~Ok~~C ~~~~~~~ ~~ P~~~ EE, LS•l IItRIGATION PERFORMANCE 3PECIFICATION3 UIDC 11-3B-6 Project Name: ~"GU1-~/ZD C~Ni d/U /1,D. 2 ~T Z , ~GbL,~ ~r-(' Specifications: Available Gallons per Minute: 2~ t!r~~ Available Water Pressure: /off Point of Connection (describe and/or submit a site~plan): 5th 6030/!~/fl0/U P~}N S Primary Connection: AXIS(/AJ(,/'ll 57~j~gwQ ONE Secondary Connection: 2i lST/N(, WQl_ ~D />Uit^~ 5~~0/l~ Landscape Area: If the irrigation system is hooked to City water as a primary or secondary water source, submit the square footage of landscaped areas to be irrigated: A l ~ square feet Backflow Prevention _A backflow prevention device must be installed as required by City Ordinance 9-3. Coverage: The irrigation system must be designed to provide 100% coverage with head to head spacing or triangular spacing as appropriate. Matched Precipitation Rates: Sprinkler heads must have matched precipitation rates within each control valve circuit. Irrigation Zones: Sprinkler heads irrigating lawn or other high-water-demand areas must be circuited so that they are on a separate zone or zones from those irrigating trees, shrubs, or other reduced-water-demand areas. Overspray: Sprinkler heads must be adjusted to reduce overspray onto impervious surfaces such as sidewalks, driveways, and parking areas. Notes: Irrigation Required: All landscape areas shall be served with an automafic underground irrigation system. Additional requirements affecting pressurized irrigation systems can be found in City Ordinance 9-1-28. Irrigation Water Source: Use ofnon-potable irrigation water is required when determined to be available by the City Public Works Department as regulated by City Ordinance 9-1-28. If city potable water is used, a separate water meter is recommended so the owner can avoid paying sewer fees for irrigation water, Potable water shall not be used as a primary irrigation water source on non-residential lots with more than %z acre of landscaping. Year round water availability is also eequired by connecting to city potable water or an on-site well as a secondary source. Certification: I have read and understand the above spec j~cations and notes for irrigation systems and hereby affirm that any irrigation system installed for• the project mentioned above rvil(comply lvith these spec cations and notes. Applicant's Signature: ~ ~' f / A// -" ~ Date: ~ ~J~ AFFIDAVIT ®F LEGAL Iri1TEIFEST STATE OF IDAHO COUNTY OF ADA I, FR~2ur~ST~~ t Le , y~~ ~, ~2•r~0~ s~-~o z 6~~ ~/(n>a°m~je) /~~~ (address) ' 1 (city) (state) being first duly sworn upon, oath, depose and say: 1. That I am the record owner of the property described on the attached, and I grant my permission to: ff~(Lur/~ LLC_ ~~ ~.. /I2~O~~v STE /c~ 2 (name) (address) to submit the accompanying application(s) pertaining to that property. 2. I agree to indemnify, defend and hold the City of Meridian and its employees harmless from any claim or liability resulting from any dispute as to the statements contained herein or as to the ownership of the property which is the subject of the application. 3. I hereby grant permission to City of Meridian staff to enter the subject property for the purpose of site inspections related to processing said application(s). Dated this day of ~ C.`d b ~I~P,t' , 20~ Signature) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me the day and year first above written. ~n~~~ Tr~nsnato®n T691S IN$iT,iVY Fti~O:F N~6~D 9Y, TRAN5NA~10{V`YITLE"b FSGNOUV, INLF}S:APt ACCOIVIMbOATIQN.ONLY:. l`f NAS (dOTBEEN `EXAMINEDAS TO ILS EXECUTION OR ASTO ITS AFFECT UPON THE T!~'LE. Escrow No. ~aa°~`'"'°~t`°' AOA COUNTY RECORDER J. DAVID NAUARRO AMOUNT 9.96. 3 BOISE IDAHO 07167165 04:39 PM DEPUTY Neaua Haney RECORDED-REQUEST OF 'II I'II'~"Ii'~!I'I'~~'II"'~"II~' Transnalion Title ~~~~d4~~~ ®~~® FOR VALUE RECEIVED Marty Goldsmith, GRANTOR(S), does(do) hereby GRANT, BARGAIN, SELL AND CONVEY unto: Farwest L.L.C. , an Idaho Limited Liability Company GRANTEES(S), whose current address is: 420 W. Washington Street Boise, ID 63702 the following described real property in ada County, State of Idaho, more particularly described as follows, to wit: See Legal Description marked as Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said prenuses, with their appurtenances unto the said heirs and assigns forever. And the said Grantor(s) does(do) hereby covenant to and with the said Grantee(s), that Grantor(s) is/are the owner(s) in fee simple of said premises; that said premises are free from all encumbrances EXCEPT those to which this conveyance is expressly made subject and those made, suffered or done by the Grantee(s); and subject to reservations, restrictions, dedications, easements, rights of way and agreements, (if any) of record, and general taxes and assessments, (including imgation and utility assessments, if any) for the current year,.which are not yet due and payable, and that Grantor(s) will warrant and defend the same from all ]awfid claims whatsoever. Date: .TUly 1, 2D05 Marty ldsmi th 3 Notary Acknowledgment -see page 2 I WAR2AN?Y DEED -NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT(S): State of Idaho, County of Ada, ss. On this ~'~ day of July in the year of 2005, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Marty Goldsmith known or identified to me to be the person(s) whose name(sj 's/are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that helshe/they executed the same. De ieAndrews `' o'"g0~0o~treANbk~,`°P ® wq p°°°°°°<°° ~ °.. Residing at: Boise, ID a°` O ° ° °° ~ `; °°lyOTA~ ° N ° My commission expires: 11/6/09 y °~ ~F 8 ~ ° e 8 ° ~' 4 „flvl°°°°l~U(31~1 ~, Qa ,° OBIT °Aw PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: The Easf Half of the East Haif of the Southwest Quarter and the Wesf Half of the W est Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. EXCEPTING THEREFROM A parcel of land located in the South Half of Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being the proposed Lot 4, Block 3, SAGUARO CANYON SUBDIVISION NO. 1, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of Section 3D, Township 4 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho; thence South 89°45'44' East along the South line of said Section 30, 2158.97 feet to a point; thence North 0°14'16" East 297.44 feet to the Southwest corner of proposed Lot 4, Block 3, Saguaro Canyon Subdivision No.1,the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence continuing around said proposed Lot 4 the following courses and distances; (hence North 0°29'56" East 154.11 feet to a point; thence South 89°46'01" East 79.00 feet to a point; thence South 80°28'04" East 43.31 feetto a point; thence South 69°46'01" Easf 43.64 feet to a point; thence South 32°09'17" East 6D.85 feet to a point; thence South 9°39'35" East 27.53 feet to a point; thence South 69°06'25" East 80.11 feet to a point of curvature; thence along a curve to the right 21.06 feet, said curve having a radius of 312.50 feet, a central angle of 3°51'40", tangents of 10.53 feet, and a chord of 21.06 feet which bears South 39°06'36" West to a point; thence North 69°06'25" West 62.12 feet to a point; thence South 5°DD'S7" West 18.44 feet to a point; thence South 47°44'47"West 59.70 feet to a point; thence South 67°35'58" West 48.34 feet fo a point; thence South 23°37'18" West 17.46 feet to a point; thence North 66°22'42"West 113.04 feet to a point of curvature; thence along a curve to the left 6.70 feet, said curve having a radius of 325.00 feet, a central angle of 1 °10'55", tangents of 3.35 feet, and a chord of 6.70 feet which bears North 66°58'10" West to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. CITY OF PYIG~IG"Yl 33 E. Idaho Ave. H Meridian, ID 83642 o ~ C] H ~ N• O ~C tD ~ o ~ ~ G N ~ [3 I (D W n n n m N• m =n a a rr r~ r- ,''3 N ° ~ -a N r~r ti o •c ~ ~ ~ ~ c • .,a m ~ ~ o w ~ O f'Rf O ON ~ w N. ~, w~ ° a, ru (D ~ _ ~ >F O ~ w _ ~t O ~. O ~ O O iF ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' 1~. n H tfJ ',T7 , H. , ~ 7. a, J G~ o~o ox~~ Nom, t70~ ~md~~ ~ ~~zy~ ~~r~%~ ~A~o~ ~z~ my~ n 0 N ^o k F.a O S om~ I °~° O N ! O m 1 ~ ~ z o O ~ w w w~°m cn m z o Z -1 Nco~ S Z W ~ a ~ ~ o N O Z N ~ O ~ ~ m N p O O N c_o N /i~cr~~or~ R'- III ! ~4~"r'V ~~ ~z "o~ o' o ` ` _[ n r g . ~ - " ~ r . ~ ( ~., i I . eggpp _ p y ~ I ~~ 2 ~~' l ~ , l ~ 1~ 1~ 1 ~ 1. ku8~j 3 ~~~~~a ~~~~2~ ~~~~~~ °~~$ ~ ~ , °~;~ F U e~ i rD D Z =~~~60 °j ~~,~v `m~1"v Y~ ~;al&i~ia aye =~; o ~~II~~!I~'isl ~ oD ~; _ ~ n I"k CI21l:i"!!"I. A -OI Z og e~ a 0 m D r ~~~ `> o. a~ Y ~l"•U e .F is w~~ ~_ ~~ - ~a ' ~ i." ~ ~° I ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~- / ;~~~ 1i'% /~ \ ~~~ ~~x p , f ~~ 1J ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~' / ~ I a ~ ( ~ $ e _ s ~~ ~ q SAGUARO CANYON StIBPIYISION N01 li'i~l ~ 7 1 t m~ , N e E $ R ~RIpIAN, IDAHO COR51PolC11gJ III ILtI.I F 5 P~ pAK.FSi LLG 44B~pRcSDEN PLACE StE. iDi i,~~l V~"`-~a~a ~$ eols- roAw II ICI y~ _ }¢q FHIAE: IiZB):9B~0'B9 fA%: (1e21316 }6tll )~ 0F4 ~1/Ief 9~ ~ - ~~ C // 5 $ 5 F ~ ~ , t ~ / 7 a r ~ s a ~$ d - / ~ . I A / ~ r r ~ - O . , ~ / ~ r ~9a p / ~ - ' ! /E , ~ / 1 / ( / / 5 / / / / / / / ° / a // //! ~~~~ / / / ,/ 4/ / /~. ( , i a~°~ ~~ °3~~L ~ / / / ~' / / / i ~ / / - / l j ` ~ / / / / / 1 B° l I l/ l . - ,. / ~ - !~ ~Q o~ q t1D1 O T r n z ~~ s~~ °"y`'9 __ /''. a _ j: ~ ~- si a ~, i'. /. 1 i e~ / ~ J 1 _ ' ~ / ~ / ° e~ / ~ / i /' / ;'/ ~ ~ 1~ ~-_ - / ~ ~' ° _ °~ ~ SAGUARO CANYON SUBDIVISION N01 ~i~'F~I) i ~~ f ` ~"~ N p p $ gflq MERIDIAF, IDA40 CLN6iPo1CilON 1~~ ~-n-~ __ '~ N H gG FA,9L£Si LLC. 4481 DRESDEN PLACE SiE IB] Ilih~- ~ ~b~ ZdSE I~AW ~I ~ Pua~ n¢¢inea.mas vax: ¢¢e/ais p¢q IIi! _t,,,,,,, ;~GM.. ,~, 1 4i e 1( ~~~.,~~~ ;; \.<;, '' ti.~ - .w, °f~1~ Planning Department CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE Application Checklist Project name: Sf~G Ut~llD ef ~ ~Z /~IIC~ ~~ ~/(/y~i(J /yf~. File #: ApplicanUagent ~ ~w~ ~/ ~ ~~~_ ~ Q~~l ~S G/l)l->//1 )~~~1// i L~~ /!V 'L. All applicafions are required to contain one copy of the following unless otherwise noted: App~cant Description S ~ff (/' Com leted & si ned Adrninistrative Review A lication Narrative fully describing the proposed use of the property, including the following: ', - Information on any previous approvals or requirements for the requested use i.e. a licable conditiotu ofe royal or Develo mentA reement (l Recorded warran deed for the sub'ect roe Affidavit of Legal Interest signed & notarized by the property owner (ie o~mer is a eorpomtion, (/~ submit a w of the Articles oflnco moon or other evidence to show that tha rson si in is an authorized a ent. Scaled vicini ma showin the location of the sub'ect ro e !/ Irri ation Performance S ecifications form tom leted & si ned b the a lieant/a ent /J Sanita Service Com an a royal for trash enclosure & access drive (stamped site tan) / ' A photometric test report for any light fixture(s) with a maximum output of 1,800 lumens N ~ or more see LIDC 11-3A-11 Site Plan~l aspics (folded to 8 %z" x 11"size) v The followin items must be shown on the site lan: (/ Date, scale, north arrow, and ro"ect name (state not tens than t"=so') (/ • Names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the developer and the person and/or firm re arin the lan • Parkin stalls and drive aisles • Trash enclosure s tocation • Detail of trash enclosure (must ba screened on 3 sides) / • Location and specifications for underground irrigation (Pressurized irrigatimr can only be " waived if ou rove no water ri hts exist to sub ect ro • Sidewalks or athwa s (ro sed and exiatin ) / . Location of ro osed buitdin on lot include dimensions to ro ny lines) • Fencin (pro osed and existing) • Caloulations table including the following: - Number of parking stalls required & provided (specify handicap & compact stalls) - Building size (sq. tt.) - Lot size (sq. ftJ - Setbacks - Zonin district Landscape plan - 3 copies (folded to 8 %:" x 11" size) Plan must have a scale no sura!!er than ! " = 50' (1 " = 20' is preferred) and be on a standard v- drawing sheet, not to exceed 36"z 48" (24"x 36" is preferred). A plan which cannot be drawn !n its enthety on a single sheet must be drmvn with appropriate match lines on nvo or• more sheets. The followin items must be included on the landsca a tan: e Date, scale, north arrow and ro'ect name • Names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the developer and the person and/or Ci firm re arin the Ian • Existing natural features such as canals, creeks, drains, ponds, wetlands, t/ flood lains, hi roundwater areas, and rock outero in s. 660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 202 • Meridian, Idaho R3642 s ~..r Phone: (208) 8845533 • Facsimile: (208) 888-6678 Website: www.meridiancity.org f fig,, ~ r; t x 4 ~ H! ~ 3~ i $ ifs' ~FSti ~ `.'Z ;d~~ ~. i1~f~ .rn F ~K~ e Location, size, and species of all existing trees on site with hunks 4 inches or '.. ri greater in diameter, measured 6 inches above the ground. Indicate whether the '.. tree will be retained or removed. v- e A statement of how existing healthy trees proposed to be retained will be rotected from dama a durin construction ~ • Existing structures, planting areas, light poles, power poles, walls, fences, berms, parking and loading areas, vehicutar drives, trash areas, sidewalks, pathways, stormwater detention areas, si s, street furniture, and other man-made elements. r/ Existing and proposed contours for all areas steeper than 20% slope. Berms shall be shown with one-foot contours. • Si ht Trian les as defined in 11-3A-5 of this ordinance. • Location and labels for all proposed plants, including trees, shrubs, and gCOUndCOV0C5(tcees must not be planted in City water or sewer easements). Scale ShoWll for taut materials shall reflect a roximate mature size • A plant list that shows the plant symbol, quantity, botanical name, common name, minimum planting size and container, and comments (for spacing, staking, and installation as a ro riate . • Planting and installation details as necessary to ensure conformance with all re aired standards. • Desi n drawin s of all fencin ro osed for screenin u oses • Calculations of project components to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this ordinance, including: - Number of street trees and lineal feet of street frontage - Width of street buffers (exclusive ofright-of--way) - Width of parking lot perimeter landscape strip - Buffer width between different land uses (if applicable) - Number of parking stalls and percent of parking area with internal landscaping - Total number oftrees and tree species mix - Mitigation for removal of existing trees, including number of caliper inches bein removed Reduction of the landsca a Ian 8 %x" x 11" ~` Buildin elevations showin construction materials Fee ACHD Acceptance: Applicant shall be responsible for meeting Jhe requirements ofACHD as they pertain to this application. All impact fees, ifany, shall be paid prior to the issuance ofa buildingpermit. Ifany changes must be made to the site plan to accommodate the ACHD requirements, a nets site plan shall be submitted to the City of Meridian Planning & Zoning Department for approval prior to the issuance ofa building permit. Ymrr building permit will not be issued until ACHD has approved your plans and all associated fees have been paid THISAPPLICATIONSHALLNQT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE UNTIL STAFFHAS RECEIVED ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION Right-of--Way & Development Department Planning Review Division January 5, 2006 TO: Farwest, LLC 4487 N. Dresden Ste. 102 Boise, ID 83714 REP: Briggs Engineering, Inc. 1800 W. Overland Boise, ID 83705 SUBJECT: Saguaro Canyon #2 /MCZC-05-130 Swimming Pool On November 12, 2003 the Ada County Highway District acted on Saguaro Canyon Subdivision. The conditions and requirements also apply to Saguaro Canyon #2/MCZC-05-130. I have attached the above mentioned report for your information. If the site plan or use should change in the future, ACHD will review the site plan and may require improvements to the transportation system at that time. A traffic impact fee may be assessed by ACRD and will be due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Contact ACHD Planning & Development Services at 387-6170 for information regarding impact fees. Prior to the construction or installation of any roadway improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement widening, driveways, culverts, etc), a permit or license agreement must be obtained from ACHD. If you hav y estions, please feel free to contact meat (208) 387-6170. Sincerely, Andrew Mentzer Right-of-Way and Development Services, Planning Division Cc: Project File, Construction Services, Meridian i evelopent Process Checklist -] ®Submit a development application to a City or to the County ®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACRD ®The ACHD Planning Revlew Division will receive the development application to review ®The Planning Review Division will do one of the following: QSend a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific requirements at this time. ®Send a "Comply With" letter to the applicant stating that if the development is within a platted subdivision or part of a previous development application and that the site specific requirements from the previous development also apply to this development application. QWrite a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. QWrite a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluatng the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. QThe Planning Review Division will hold a Technics) Revlew meeting for all Staff and Commission Level reports. ®For ALL development applications, including those receiving a °No Revlew° or "Comply With^ letter: • The applicant should submit two (2) seta of engineered plena directly to ACHD for review by ttie Development Review Division for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements required by ACHD, then azchitectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee calculation.) • The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the right-of--way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cola. QPay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval. DID YOUREMEMBER: Canshuerion (Zone) ^ Driveway ar Property Approach(s) • Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" farm to Ada County Highway District (ACHD) Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval. ^ Working fo the ACFID Right-of--Way • Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded conhactor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit Application" to ACHD Constuction -Permits along with: a) Tralrc Control Plan b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you are placing>600 sf of conaete or asphalt. Conslnrcrian (Subdivisions) ^ Sediment & Erosion Submittal • At least one week prior to setting up aPre-Con an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be fumed into ACHD Construction -Subdivision to be eeviewed and approved by the ACHD Drainage Division. ^ Idaho Power Company • Vic Steelman at [daho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being scheduled. ^ Final Approval from Development Services • ACHD Construction -Subdivision must have received approval from Development Services prior to scheduling aPre-Can. ~ ASS ~~'~~Ada County Highway District Light-of-Way ~ Development Department Planning Review Division This application requires Commission action due to the size of the development and it's location in the North Meridian Area. This item is scheduled to be on the consent agenda on November 12, 2003 at 12:00 noon. Tech Review for this item was held with the applicant on Friday October 31, 2003. Please refer to the attachment for request for reconsideration guidelines. Staff contact: Andrea N. Tuning, 208-387-6177- phone, 208-387-6393-fax, atuninpna.achd.ada.id.us File Numbers: Sagauro Canyon Subdivision Site address: North side of McMillan Road east of Meridian Road Owner: Robert and Marlene Rhead 700 East McMillan Road Meridian, Idaho 83642 Applicant: Farwest, LLC 4487 North Dresden Place #102 Garden City, Idaho 83714 Representative: Briggs Engineering 1800 West Overland Road Boise, Idaho 83705 Application Information: The applicant has submitted an application to the City of Meridian requesting annexation, rezone and preliminary plat approval to construct a 461-lot single-family residential subdivision on 140.25-acres. The site is currently zoned RUT and is proposed to be rezoned to R-4. The site is located on the north side of McMillan Road approximately one-half of a mile west of Locust Grove Road. Acreage: 140.25-acres Current Zoning: RUT Proposed Zoning: R-4 Buildable Lots: 461-lots Common Lots: 43-lots Vicinity Map A. Findings of Fact Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 4,412 additional vehicle trips per day (20 existing) based on the submitted traffic impact study. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of a building permit. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that time. 3. Site Information: The site currently has two existing single-family residential homes. 4. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area: a. North: Two 10-acre sites with single family residences and a 22.95-acre site with asingle- family residence b. South: Crestwood Subdivision (5-acre sites) and Cobre Basin (Havasu Creek Subdivision) c. East: 10-acre site with asingle-family residence, a 29.7-acre site with asingle-family residence and Larkwood Subdivision (2 to 3-acre sites) d. West: 18.17-acre site with single-family residence and 103.24-acre site with single-family residence 6. Impacted Roadways McMillan Road: Frontage: 1,314-feet Functional Street Classification: Minor arterial Traffic count: West of Locust Grove Road was 3,598 on 6-20-01 Level of Service: Currently better than C Speed limit: 50 MPH Meridian Road: Frontage: Functional Street Classification Traffic count: Level of Service: Speed limit: Locust Grove Road: Frontage: Functional Street Classification: Traffic count: Level of Service: Speed limit: None Minor arterial South of State Highway 20/26 was 2,839 on 1-22-03 Currently better than C 50 MPH None Minor arterial South of State Highway 20/26 was 3,013 on 1-22-03 South of McMillan Road was 4,719 on 6-28-01 Currently better than C 50 MPH 7. Roadway Improvements Adjacent To and Near the Site McMillan Road is currently improved with 2-traffic lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. Cobre Basin (Havasu Creek Subdivision) will construct a 5-foot concrete sidewalk on the south side of McMillan Road. In addition to sidewalk, this subdivision was required to construct a center turn lane on McMillan Road for the main entrance. 8. Existing Right-of-Way McMillan Road currently has a total of 50 to 58-feet of right-of-way (25-feet from centerline). 9. Existing Access to the Site The site currently has an existing driveway that intersects McMillan Road approximately 425-feet east of the west property line. 10. Site History The District has not previously reviewed a development application for this site. 11. Capital Improvements Plan/Five Year Work Program McMillan Road is not programmed in the District's Five Year Work Program but is scheduled in the District's Capital Improvements Plan as item #74. McMillan Road is anticipated to be reconstructed in the year 2018 as a 3-lane roadway with curb, gutter and a detached 5-foot concrete sidewalk. 12. Other Development in Area Staff has been receiving large amounts of inquiries from developers in the north Meridian area. Many developers are prepared to plat entire section-miles, and have site plans developed. The preliminary plans generally include upwards of 700 to 900 residential lots, schools, office/commercial Tots, and city and neighborhood parks. The following list is a compilation of developments that the District has approved recently within this identified area: • On October 17, 2001 the Commission approved a rezone and preliminary plat application for an 8-lot industrial subdivision on 34.6-acres (Utility Subdivision}. Note: Later denied by City of Meridian. • On November 7, 2001 the Commission approved a rezone and annexation application for 370- acres. The Commission also approved a preliminary plat for 336-lots on 175-acres and conditional use approval for a total of 692 single-family residences, 59 senior housing units, 17 office lots, 10 commercial lots, and an elementary school (Bridgetower Subdivision). • On February 6, 2002, the Commission approved a preliminary plat application fora 272-lot residential subdivision on 78-acres (Baldwin Park). • On April 17, 2002, the Commission approved a preliminary plat application fora 285-lot subdivision on 75-acres (Heritage Commons Subdivision). • On May 22, 2002, the Commission approved a preliminary plat application for an 876-lot mixed- use subdivision. The subdivision consisted of 862 single-family dwellings, 171 multi-family dwellings, 11 office buildings, 1 commercial building, 1 fire station, 1 city park and 1 private park (Lochsa Falls Subdivision). • On July 17, 2002, the Commission approved a request for approval for an annexation and rezone fora 135,000 square foot Middle School within the Meridian School District. • On August 21, 2002, the Commission approved a preliminary plat application fora 144-lot residential subdivision on 43-acres (Sundance Place Subdivision). • On August 28, 2002, the Commission approved a preliminary plat application fora 12-lot residential subdivision on 5-acres (Drawbridge Subdivision). • On October 23, 2002, the Commission approved an 89-lot residential subdivision on 15.4-acres (Cobblefield Crossing Subdivision). • November 6, 2002, the Commission approved a 327-lot residential subdivision and 1 school site on 120-acres (Havasu Creek Subdivision). 3 • On November 6, 2002, the Commission approved a 3-lot commercial subdivision that is anticipated to include a new Meridian School District Educational Campus that will include one elementary school, two senior high charter schools, two senior high professional technical high schools and one District administration building on 39-acres (Education Campus Subdivision). • On November 20, 2002, the Commission approved, Burney Glen Subdivision, a 117-lot single- family residential subdivision on 36-acres • On November 26, 2002, the Commission approved Cedar Springs North Subdivision, a 229-lot mixed-use subdivision consisting of 184-single-family residential lots, 12-office lots, 32-common lots and 1-lot that is anticipated to redevelop into attached single-family residential Tots (town houses). • On January 8, 2003, the Commission approved Watersong Estates Subdivision, a 125-lot single- family residential subdivision located on 39.92. • On January 15, 2003, the Commission approved Silverleaf Subdivision, a 73-lot mixed-use subdivision. The subdivision is proposed to contain 72-single-family residential lots and 1- elementaryschool lots located on 38.65-acres. • On January 29, 2003, the Commission approved Parkstone Subdivision, a 334-mixed-use subdivision proposed to contain 275-single-family residential lots, 52-townhouse lots, 4-office lots, 2-commercial lots and 1-mini storage lot. • On February 19, 2003, the Commission approved Setter Cove Subdivision, a 16-lot single-family residential subdivision located on 10-acres. • On March 19, 2003, the Commission approved Paramount Subdivision, an 847-lot mixed-use subdivision proposed to contain 764 single-family residential lots, 5-commercial and office lots, 73-townhouse lots, 1multi-family lot (270 apartments), a community center, 1-elementary school lot, 1-high school lot and 2-church lots on 392-acres. • On April 23, 2003, the Commission approved Birthstone Creek Subdivision, a 98-lot residential subdivision consisting of 89 single-family lots, an elementary school site and 8 common lots on 34.5-acres. • On May 28, 2003, the Commission approved Blooming Meadows Subdivision, a 62-lot residential subdivision consisting of 32-single-family lots, 30 multi-family lots and 8 common lots on 11.3- acres. • On July 2, 2003, the Commission approved Kelly Creek Subdivision, a 230-lot mixed us subdivision consisting of 216 single-family lots and 14-commercial/office lots. If staff examines each development individually, the roadway system appears adequate, but when staff begins to add in a second or third large-scale development, the traffic capacities of the surrounding roadways reach their 2020 planning thresholds. One option for funding improving these roadways is the implementation of an extra-ordinary impact fee overlay district. This application may also be subject to any extraordinary fees that the District may impose. B. Findings for Consideration Traffic Impact Study: A traffic impact study was required with this application due to the size of this development. The following are the Conclusions/Recommendations of the submitted Traffic Impact Study for the Saguaro Canyon Subdivision located in the North Meridian Planning Area: 4 • The proposed Saguaro Canyon development is projected to generate an average daily traffic count (ADT) of 4,412 vehicles per day (vpd), of which the peak hour traffic (PHT) is projected to be 466 vehicles per hour (vph). • At build-out (2013), the daily traffic on Red Horse Way, the entrance to the development, is estimated to be 3,600 vpd. The COMPASS-planning threshold (Level of Service C) for atwo-lane collector roadway (non-business district) is 8,500 vehicles per day. Based on these criteria, the main roadways will operate well under capacity. The internal streets that are planned for front-on-housing have daily traffic projections less than ACHD's planning threshold for local streets. Stub streets in the development are anticipated to carry some of the daily trips to and from Saguaro Canyon when the areas they are stubbed to develop. By the time the Saguaro Canyon is built out other developments are expected to connect the stub streets to Meridian Road, Locust Grove Road, Chinden Boulevard and other access points on McMillan Road. • A separate eastbound left-turn lane is required on McMillan Road at the site access intersection. A separate westbound right-turn lane is required for westbound right turns. These requirements were determined using ACHD's warrant for right-turn and left-turn bays. • The site access intersection meets the peak hour signal warrant for the build out year of 2013. The capacity analysis determined that the intersection of Red Horse Way and McMillan Road operates as a LOS D as a 4-way stop and LOS B as a signal controlled intersection. Any installation of a signal should be based upon an engineering study and signal warrant analysis once peak volumes have been reached at the intersection. Roadways: • Reconstruction of the McMillan Road between Locust Grove Road and Linder Road is included in the CIP and is currently scheduled for year 2014-2018. This section of roadway is scheduled for construction as a three-lane roadway in the CIP. • The following is the most recent volume counts for the 12 square mile area defined as the North Meridian Planning Area as was used in the traffic study submitted by Washington Infrastructure Services. North Meridian Planning Area Roadway Volumes: Roa~wa~ "~~ r° Locatmn ;~ ~~- Sting T Date of COMPASS y CdiVIPt1SS 2025 i CIP ~ , ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ,~ ~~ ~ ~ fr ~ olumes ~"Cbunt' ~ Thresholds' , ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ Itoadwaw x ,, g ~... (.,~ ~:.,., x.f,,. err,. Y. . *~ t ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ': ,,, , ~ r...N; CIassifcahons.14 ~ Se ment Chinden Blvd. W/Eagle 21,400 3/03 18,500 3-Lane Principal TTD Arterial Chinden Blvd. E/Meridian 15,300 1/03 15,500 2-Lane Principal ITD Arterial Chinden Blvd. E/Cinder 14,000 1/03 15,500 2-Lane Principal ITD Arterial Chinden Blvd. E/Ten Mile 12,700 4/02 15,500 2-Lane Principal ITD Arterial Chinden Blvd. E/Black Cat 12,200 6102 15,500 2-Lane Principal ITD e Arterial Chinden Blvd. E/ McDermott 11,200 4/02 15,500 2-Lane Principal Arterial ITD McMillan Road W/Eaele 9600 5/03 14,000 2-Lane Minor Arterial Yes McMillan Road E/Meridian 3600 6/01 14,000 2-Lane Minor Yes Arterial McMillan Road E/Linder 3100 4/02 14,000 2-Lane Minor Arterial No McMillan Road E/Ten Mile 1500 7/02 14,000 2-Lane Minor No Arterial McMillan Road E1 Black Cat 1200 7/02 9500 2-Lane Collector No McMillan Road E/ McDermott 800 7/02 9500 2-Lane Collector No Ustick Road W/Eaele 10,800 8/03 14,000 2-Lane Minor Arterial Yes Ustick Road W/Locust 7100 4/02 14,000 2-Lane Minor Yes Grove Arterial Ustick Road W/Meridian 6300 4/02 14,000 2-Lane Minor No Arterial Ustick Road W/Cinder 6300 4/02 14,000 2-Lane Minor Arterial No Ustick Road W/Ten Mile 3600 8/01 14,000 2-Lane Minor No Arterial Ustick Road WBlack Cat 2300 12/02 14,000 2-Lane Minor No Arterial Locust Grove Road N/Ustick 5700 6/01 14,000 2-Lane Minor Arterial No Locust Grove N/McMillan 3000 1/03 14,000 2-Lane Minor No Road Arterial Meridian Road N1Ustick 4900 4/02 14,000 2-Lane Minor Arterial No Meridian Road NlMcMillan 2800 1/03 14,000 2-Lane Minor No Arterial Linder Road N(Ustick 5900 4/02 14,000 2-Lane Minor Arterial No Linder Road N/McMillan 6300 4/02 14,000 2-Lane Minor No Arterial Ten Mile Road N/Ustick 2700 7/02 14,000 2-Lane Minor No Arterial Ten Mile Road N/McMillan 2000 7/02 14,000 2-Lane Minor No Arterial Black Cat Road N/Ustick 1900 7/02 14,000 2-Lane Minor No Arterial Black Cat Road N/McMillan 1500 7/02 14,000 2-Lane Minor No Arterial McDermott N/Ustick 400 12/02 14,000 2-Lane Section Line No Road McDermott NlMcMillan 300 4/02 14,000 2-Lane Section Line No Road Most recent traffic counts -rounded to nearest 100 trips Auxiliary Lanes: • The need for the auxiliary lanes will be dictated by both the phasing of this development and also the rate in which build-out occurs. The traffic study predicted that the need for an eastbound left-turn lane would be warranted as 25% of the build-out volumes. The applicant may choose to install the left- turn lane either when the project begins construction or when the warrant is met. The threshold of 25% of build-out, based on 461 residential units, would occur at the 115'h residential lot. The installation of the left-turn Zane may need to be coordinated with the westbound left-turn lane required with the Havasu Creek Subdivision located on the south side of McMillan Road. The proposed location of Red Horse Way aligns with the McMillan access for Havasu Creek. • The traffic study also predicted that the need for a westbound right-turn lane at approximately 12% of the build-out volumes. The applicant may choose to install the right-turn lane either when the project is build or when the warrant is met. The threshold of 12% of build-out, based on 461 residential units, would occur at the 55°i residential lot. 2. Staff Analysis of the Submitted Traffic Impact Study • The intersections of McMillan/Locust Grove and McMillan/Meridian currently are all-way stop controlled. They both have single lanes at the four approaches. These two intersections were operating at a LOS B during the PM peak hour when analyzed in the North Meridian Planning Area traffic study. As was discussed in the October 6'h, 2004 joint meeting with the City of Meridian, these two intersections are scheduled for updated counts when the road closures are completed and the traffic volumes return to normal conditions. These intersections will then be analyzed and recommendations will be made if minor improvements are needed to improve the intersections level of service (LOS). The currently adopted Capital Improvements Plan (2003) does not include the signalization of these intersections as Impact Fee eligible. During the updating process to the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) the cost of signalization may be added if it meets the established criteria. The signalization also is not scheduled in the current Five Year Work Program (FYWP). The intersection of McMillan/Locust Grove currently ranked 29'h out of 85 intersections on the new traffic signal prioritization list. The intersection of McMillan/Meridian currently ranks 47"' out of 85 on the same list. The traffic study estimated that the site access intersection, McMillan/Red Horse Way, meets the peak hour signal warrant for the build-out year of 2013. The intersection is also projected to operate at a LOS D as an all-way stop controlled, which would be acceptable for a minor arterial roadway. As was mentioned, any installation of a signal should be based upon an engineering study and signal warrant analysis once the peak hour volumes have been reached. If not included as impact fee eligible, the subdivisions accessing this intersection may be required to fund any future traffic signal. 7 3. Executive Summary of the North Meridian Traffic Plan The proposed 12-square mile study area between US 20/26 and Ustick Road and between McDermott Road and Eagle Road has been examined by the Ada County Highway District (ACHD) for anticipated development build out. The following are the principal findings and recommendations of the study: • The study area is anticipated to develop an additional 17,599 dwelling units, 2,744,000 sq. ft of office buildings, 1,929,000 sq.ft. of retail buildings, 12 elementary schools, 2 senior high schools, 2 junior high schools, 38,260 sq. ft of church buildings, and approximately 60 acres of park, at full build out. • The build out scenario of the study area is projected to generate an average daily traffic (ADT) of 276,764 vehicles per day (vpd), of which the peak hour traffic (PHT) will be 28,206 vehicles per hour (vph). Out of these trips approximately 10% of the trips remain internal within each section, and 6% of the trips are pass-by trips. • The distribution of the traffic from all of the study area sections indicate that approximately 30% traffic directed towards south, 27% of the traffic directed towards east, 21% of the traffic directed towards west and north. The remaining 22% of the traffic is distributed within the study area. • At build out, traffic on the arterials is expected to significantly increase. • All of the arterial intersections in the study area are currently operating at acceptable level of service of "C" or better. • The majority of study intersections are projected to meet the peak hour traffic signal warrants at full build out of the area. • Several mid-mile intersections may warrant traffic signals due to the heavy left turn traffic volume. • At full build out, the following improvements may be anticipated within the study area: 0 5-lane road section with right turn lanes at some arterial and access intersections: Chinden Boulevard, McMillan east of Black Cat, Ustick east of Black Cat, Linder, Ten Mile, Meridian south of McMillan, and Locust Grove at Ustick. 0 3-lane road section with right turn lanes at some arterial and access intersections: McMillan west of Black Cat, Ustick west of Black Cat, McDermott, Black Cat, Meridian north of McMillan, and Locust Grove. Due to the large number of inquiries and submitted development applications in this area, staff and the development community realized that the potential for development in this area is significant and the traffic impact studies that each individual developer was submitting did not include the major surrounding developments that are "in the works". Based on development patterns in this area, and the concern surrounding the abutting roadways, ACHD hired Washington Group to conduct a traffic impact study of the northwestern Meridian area from Ustick Road to Chinden Boulevard, and from McDermott Road to Eagle Road. The study was necessary to determine what types of roadway improvements, especially at intersections, would be needed to accommodate the traffic in this area at full build out. One option for funding improving these roadways is the implementation of an extra-ordinary impact fee overlay district. This applicant will be subject to extraordinary fees, should an overlay district be implemented in this area. 3. Right-of-Way District policy requires 96-feet of right-of-way on arterial roadways (Figure 72-F1 B). This right-of-way allows for the construction of a 5-lane roadway with curb, gutter, 5-foot concrete detached sidewalks and bike lanes. 8 District policy normally requires developments on minor arterial roadways to dedicate 48-feet of right- of-way from centerline to provide for a total of 96-feet of right-of-way in the future. Based on the projections that were determined by the North Meridian Traffic Study, the District has determined that McMillan Road can function at an acceptable level of service (in the future) as a 3-lane minor arterial. In addition to functioning adequately, the District's Capital Improvements Plan has McMillan Road designated as a 3-lane roadway within a total of 70-feet of right-of-way. There is also an existing canal that is located on the north side of McMillan Road. Based on past action, the District has been acquiring all of the right-of-way on this segment of McMillan Road from the property on the south side of McMillan Road to avoid having to relocate the canal. Due to the fact that McMillan Road has been earmarked as a 3-lane roadway and the District is acquiring all of the right-of-way on McMillan Road from the south side (Cobre Basin Subdivision aka Havasu Creek Subdivision) staff is recommending that the District not acquire additional right-of-way on McMillan Road abutting this parcel. 4. Sidewalk District policy requires the construction of a 5-foot concrete sidewalk on all arterial roadways. Modification of Policy The applicant is proposing to construct a 10-foot wide asphalt pathway on the north side of the canal, in lieu of constructing a 5-foot concrete sidewalk. The applicant is proposing to construct the 10-foot wide asphalt pathway due to the fact that the pathway can provide multiple functions: a pedestrian path, bicycle path and an irrigation roadway. Staff is supportive the applicant's proposal to construct a 10-foot wide (minimum) asphalt pathway just north of the canal in lieu of sidewalk. 5. Roadway Offsets District policy 7204.11.6 states that the optimum spacing for collector intersections along arterial roadways is 1,700-feet to allow adequate signal spacing. The minimum spacing that is acceptable for collector intersections along arterials is 1,300-feet. The applicant is proposing to construct the main entrance, North Red Horse Way to intersect McMillan Road approximately 515-feet east of the west property line. This roadway is proposed to be located at the half-mile and is proposed to align with the main entrance to Cobre Basin. This roadway location meets District policy and should be approved with this application. All of the internal roadways meet minimum offset requirements and should be approved with this application. 6. Turn Lanes District policy 3004.1, 72-F8, AASHTO guidelines and the MUTCD guidelines require the turn lane to be constructed to provide a minimum of 100-feet of storage with shadow tapers for both the approach and departure directions. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. District policy 3004.1 and AASHTO Guidelines require tapers to be constructed on a varying basis contingent upon the posted speed limit. Coordinate the design of the taper with District staff. Based on the submitted traffic impact study, the applicant should construct an eastbound center turn lane at the intersection of McMillan Road and North Red Horse Way. This turn lane is required to be installed at 25% of this projects build-out. The applicant may choose to install the left- turn lane either when the project is being built or when the warrant is met. The warrant is anticipated to be met at the final platting of lot 115. The installation of this turn lane may need to be coordinated with the 9 westbound left-turn lane required with the Havasu Creek Subdivision located on the south side of McMillan Road. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. Based on the submitted traffic impact study, the applicant should construct a westbound right turn lane at the intersection of McMillan Road and North Red Horse Way. This turn lane should be required to be installed at 12% of this projects build-out. Due to the fact that the canal is located on the north side of McMillan Road and there is not sufficient right-of-way to construct the westbound right turn lane, the applicant will not be able to construct the westbound right turn lane. Street Sections District policy 72-F1A, allows local residential public roads with a 33-foot street section with parking on both sides of the roadway, if the amount of vehicle trips per day on the street does not exceed 1,000 and the appropriate fire department reviews and approves the street section. The proposed density of development that will utilize the internal local residential streets is anticipated to generate less than 1,000 vehicle trips per day. District policy 7204.4.3 states, "a developer may construct a local urban residential street with a reduced width of 29-feet from back-of-curb to back-of-curb with curb, gutter and sidewalk. Although some parking is allowed, the District will further restrict parking on a reduced width street if curves or other physical feature causes problems, if actual emergency response experience indicates that emergency vehicles may not be able to provide service, or if other safety concerns arise. The right- of-way width of a 29-foot street section will be in accordance with Section 7204.4.1. Parking is allowed on one side of a reduced width street when the following criteria are met: o Traffic volumes on the street are not forecast to exceed 1,000 vehicle trips per day. o There must be no possibility that the street will be extended in the near future, or that another street may be connected to it in a manner that would allow more than 1,000 vehicle trips per day. o The developer is required to install "no parking signs" on one side of the street, as specified by the District." o Vertical curbs with attached 5-foot minimum wide sidewalks or rolled curbs with 4-foot minimum wide detached sidewalks and a 5-foot minimum wide planter strips are required. The applicant is proposing to construct North Red Horse Way as a collector roadway. This street section includes two travel lanes that are separated by a center island with center turn pockets at each public roadway intersection with vertical curb, gutter and 5-foot meandering concrete sidewalk within 75-feet of right-of-way. The sidewalk is proposed to extend outside of the proposed right-of- way. The applicant should provide the District with an easement for any part of the sidewalk that extends outside of the right-of-way. The applicant is proposing to construct Ocelot Court (from North Red Horse Way to the west), Red Hills Avenue (from Joshua Tree Street to West Prickly Pear Court), West Prickly Pear Court, North Saguaro Hills Place, North Cactus Hills Avenue, North Pinery Canyon Place, North Claret Cup Place, and North Red Hills Place (from West Cholla Hills Street to the south) as 29-foot street sections with curb, gutter and a 5-foot detached sidewalk within 50-feet of right-of-way. This street section meets District policy and should be approved with this application. Parking will be restricted to one side and the applicant will be required to provide the District with documentation that shows the review and approval from the Meridian Fire Department. If the applicant would like to construct the 29-foot street sections as 33-foot street sections with curb, gutter and sidewalk within 50-feet of right-of-way, the applicant may do so. 10 The applicant is proposing to construct the remaining roadways as 33-foot street sections with curb, gutter and a 4-foot detached concrete sidewalk within 50-feet of right-of-way. This street section meets District policy and should be approved with this application. 8. Driveways District policy 72-F5, requires driveways located on collector or arterial roadways with a speed limit of 25 to align or offset a minimum of 105-feet from any existing or proposed driveway. The applicant is proposing to construct a 20-foot wide residential driveway for lot 4 block 11 that intersects North Red Horse Way approximately 400-feet north of McMillan Road. This driveway is proposed to align with West Painted Hill Drive. North Red Horse Way is classified as a collector roadway by the submitted traffic impact study due to the volumes and functionality of the roadway. Due to the classification of North Red Horse Way, staff has applied the minimum offset policy that is utilized for collector roadways with a speed limit of 25 MPH (the anticipated speed limit of this roadway). The proposed 20-foot wide residential driveway that intersects North Red Horse Way approximately 400-feet north of McMillan Road, meets District policy and should be approved with this application. 9. Stub Streets District policy 7205.5 states that stub streets will be required to provide intra-neighborhood circulation or to provide access to adjoining properties. Stub streets will conform with the requirements described in Section 7204.5, 7204.6 and 7204.7, except atemporary cul-de-sac will not be required if the stub street has a length no greater than 150-feet. A sign shall be installed at the terminus of the stub street stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". In addition, a stub street must meet the following conditions: 1. A stub street shall be designed to slope towards the street intersection and drain surface water toward that intersection, unless a satisfactory storm drain system is installed. 2. The District may require appropriate covenants guaranteeing that the stub street will remain free of obstructions. The applicant is proposing to construct seven stub streets to the surrounding properties The applicant is proposing to construct a stub street to the west property line approximately 1,950- feet north of McMillan Road. This stub street would serve a 103-acre site in the future. Staff is supportive of the location of the proposed stub street. Due to the fact that the proposed stub street is less than 150-feet in depth, the applicant will not be required to construct a temporary turnaround at the terminus of the roadway. The applicant should install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". The applicant is proposing to construct a stub street to the west property line approximately 750-feet south of the north property line. This stub street would serve an 18-acre site in the future. Staff is supportive of the location of the proposed stub street. Due to the fact that the proposed stub street is less than 150-feet in depth, the applicant will not be required to construct a temporary turnaround at the terminus of the roadway. The applicant should install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". The applicant is proposing to construct a stub street to the north property line approximately 110-feet east of the west property line. This stub street would serve a 10-acre site in the future. Staff is supportive of the location of the proposed stub street. Due to the fact that the proposed stub street is less than 150-feet in depth, the applicant will not be required to construct a temporary turnaround at 11 the terminus of the roadway. The applicant should install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". The applicant is proposing to construct a stub street to the north property line approximately 900-feet west of the east property line. This stub street would serve a 10-acre site in the future. Staff is supportive of the location of the proposed stub street. Due to the fact that the proposed stub street is less than 150-feet in depth, the applicant will not be required to construct a temporary turnaround at the terminus of the roadway. The applicant should install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". The applicant is proposing to construct a stub street to the north property line approximately 113-feet west of the east properly line. This stub street would serve a 22-acre site in the future. Staff is supportive of the location of the proposed stub street. Due to the fact that the proposed stub street is less than 150-feet in depth, the applicant will not be required to construct a temporary turnaround at the terminus of the roadway. The applicant should install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". The applicant is proposing to construct a stub street to the east property line approximately 120-feet south of the north property line. This stub street would serve a 10-acre site in the future. Staff is supportive of the location of the proposed stub street. Due to the fact that the proposed stub street is less than 150-feet in depth, the applicant will not be required to construct a temporary turnaround at the terminus of the roadway. The applicant should install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". The applicant is proposing to construct a stub street to the east property line approximately 1,350-feet north of McMillan Road. This stub street would serve a 2-acre parcel that is already developed. Staff is not supportive of the location of the proposed stub street due to the fact that the stub street goes to a 2-acre parcel that has an existing single-family residential home and may not redevelop in the reasonable future (if it will redevelop at all). Rather than constructing a stub street to the east to a 2- acre parcel, staff recommends that the applicant construct a stub street to the east property line to the 29.7-acre site that is located to the east. If the applicant constructs a stub street to this parcel, the stub street would be less than 150-feet in depth, therefore the applicant would not be required to construct a temporary turnaround at the terminus of the stub street. The applicant should install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". 10. Turnarounds District policy 7205.2.1 requires turnarounds to be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 45-feet. The applicant should also be required to provide a minimum of a 29-foot street section on either side of any proposed center islands within the turnarounds. The medians should be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide to total a minimum of a 100-square foot area. The District will consider alternatives to the standard turnaround on a case-by-case basis. The determination to allow anon-standard turnaround will be based on turning area, drainage, maintenance considerations and the written approval of the emergency fire service for the area where the development is located. Minimum design standards shall be met for all non-standard turnarounds. Submit a design of the turnaround for review and approval by District Development Division staff. Approval of the staff report does not indicate approval of the non-standard turnaround design. The applicant is proposing to construct two standard cul-de-sac turnarounds within the subdivision. The applicant should provide a minimum turning radius of 45-feet. 12 The applicant is proposing to construct four alternative turnarounds with parking located in the center of the turnarounds. The District does consider alternatives to standard residential turnarounds. Final approval of this turnaround will be based on the turnaround providing a minimum turning radius of 18- feet, adequately accommodating for drainage and the applicant providing documentation showing the review and approval of the non standard turnaround from the Meridian Fire Department. Submit a design of the turnaround for review and approval by District Development Division staff. 11. Islands/Medians District policy 7202.7 and 7207.5 requires any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat should be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this should be required on the final plat. The applicant is proposing to construct center islands/medians within the public right-of-way of North Red Horse Way. The District and the Fire Department require that the applicant provide a minimum of a 20-foot street section on either side of any proposed center island within the public roadway. The medians should be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide to total a minimum of a 100-square foot area. The applicant is proposing to construct islands (with parking) within four of the proposed turnarounds. The applicant should provide a minimum of a 29-foot street section on either side of any proposed center islands within the turnarounds. The medians should be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide to total a minimum of a 100-square foot area. 12. Other Access McMillan Road is classified as a minor arterial roadway. The District restricts access to arterial roadways. Other than the access point that has been specifically approved with this application, direct lot access to McMillan Road is prohibited. Notes of this restriction shall be placed on the final plat. North Red Horse Way is classified as a collector roadway. The District restricts access to collector roadways. Other than the access point that has been specifically approved with this application, direct lot access to North Red Horse Way is prohibited. Notes of this restriction shall be placed on the final plat. C. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. Do NOT dedicate additional right-of-way on McMillan Road abutting this parcel. 2. Construct a 10-foot wide (minimum) asphalt pathway just north of the canal, as proposed. 3. Construct the main entrance, North Red Horse Way, to intersect McMillan Road approximately 515- feet east of the west property line to align with the main entrance of Cobre Basin Subdivision (aka Havasu Creek Subdivision), as proposed. 4. Construct an eastbound center turn lane at the intersection of McMillan Road and North Red Horse Way. Install the left- turn lane either when the project begins construction or when the warrant is met. The warrant will be met at the final platting of lot 115. Coordinate the design of the turn lane with District staff. 13 5. Construct North Red Horse Way as a collector roadway with two travel lanes that are separated by a center island with center turn pockets at each public roadway intersection with vertical curb, gutter and 5-foot meandering concrete sidewalk within 75-feet of right-of-way, as proposed. Provide the District with an easement for any part of the sidewalk that extends outside of the right-of-way. 6. Construct Ocelot Court (from North Red Horse Way to the west), Red Hills Avenue (from Joshua Tree Street to West Prickly Pear Court), West Prickly Pear Court, North Saguaro Hills Place, North Cactus Hills Avenue, North Pinery Canyon Place, North Claret Cup Place, and North Red Hills Place (from West Cholla Hills Street to the south) as 29-foot street sections with curb, gutter and a 5-foot detached sidewalk within 50-feet of right-of-way, as proposed. Parking is restricted to one side and the applicant is required to provide the District with documentation that showing the review and approval from the Meridian Fire Department. . If the applicant would like to construct the 29-foot street sections as 33-foot street sections with curb, gutter and sidewalk within 50-feet of right-of-way, the applicant may do so. 7. Construct the remaining roadways as 33-foot street sections with curb, gutter and a 4-foot detached concrete sidewalk within 50-feet of right-of-way, as proposed. 8. Construct a 20-foot wide residential driveway for lot 4 block 11 that intersects North Red Horse Way approximately 400-feet north of McMillan Road, as proposed. 9. Construct a stub street to the west property line approximately 1,950-feet north of McMillan Road, as proposed. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". 10. Construct a stub street to the west property line approximately 750-feet south of the north property line, as proposed. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". 11. Construct a stub street to the north property line approximately 110-feet east of the west property line, as proposed. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". 12. Construct a stub street to the north property line approximately 900-feet west of the east property line, as proposed. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". 13. Construct a stub street to the north property line approximately 113-feet west of the east property line, as proposed. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". 14. Construct a stub street to the east property line approximately 120-feet south of the north property line, as proposed. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". 15. Construct a stub street to the east property line to the 29.7-acre site located to the east of the subject property. Install a sign at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". 16. Construct two standard cul-de-sac turnarounds within the subdivision, as proposed. Provide a minimum turning radius of 45-feet. 14 17. Construct four alternative turnarounds with parking located in the center of the turnarounds, as proposed. Provide a minimum turning radius of 18-feet, adequately accommodate for drainage and provide the District with documentation showing the review and approval of the non standard turnaround from the Meridian Fire Department. Submit a design of the turnaround for review and approval by District Development Division staff. 18. Construct center islands/medians within the public right-of-way of North Red Horse Way, as proposed. Provide a minimum of a 20-foot street section on either side of any proposed center island within the public roadway. The medians are required to be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide to total a minimum of a 100-square foot area. 19. Construct islands (with parking) within four of the proposed turnarounds, as proposed. Provide a minimum of a 29-foot street section on either side of any proposed center islands within the turnarounds. The medians are required to be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide to total a minimum of a 100-square foot area. 20. Other than the access point that has been specifically approved with this application, direct lot access to North Red Horse Way is prohibited. Notes of this restriction shall be placed on the final plat. 21. Other than the access point that has been specifically approved with this application, direct lot access to McMillan Road is prohibited. Notes of this restriction shall be placed on the final plat. 22. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. D. Standard Conditions of Approval Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way. 2. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 4. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 5. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACRD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 6. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 7. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 15 8. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #197, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACRD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 10. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicants authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 11. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. E. Conclusions of Law The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are satisfied. 2. ACRD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Attachments 1. Vicinity Map 2. Site Plan 3. Request for Reconsideration Guidelines 16 17 Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action: A Commissioner, a member of ACHD staff or any other person objecting to any final action taken by the Commission may request reconsideration of that action, provided the request is not for a reconsideration of an action previously requested to be reconsidered, an action whose provisions have been partly and materially carried out, or an action that has created a contractual relationship with third parties. a. Only a Commission member who voted with the prevailing side can move for reconsideration, but the motion may be seconded by any Commissioner and is voted on by all Commissioners present. If a motion to reconsider is made and seconded it is subject to a motion to postpone to a certain time. b. The request must be in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Highway District no later than 3:00 p. m. on the day prior to the Commission's next scheduled regular meeting following the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken. Upon receipt of the request, the Secretary shall cause the same to be placed on the agenda for that next scheduled regular Commission meeting. c. The request for reconsideration must be supported by written documentation setting forth new facts and information not presented at the earlier meeting, or a changed situation that has developed since the taking of the earlier vote, or information establishing an error of fact or law in the earlier action. The request may also be supported by oral testimony at the meeting. d. If a motion to reconsider passes, the effect is the original matter is in the exact position it occupied the moment before it was voted on originally. It will normally be returned to ACHD staff for further review. The Commission may set the date of the meeting at which the matter is to be returned. The Commission shall only take action on the original matter at a meeting where the agenda notice so provides. e. At the meeting where the original matter is again on the agenda for Commission action, interested persons and ACRD staff may present such written and oral testimony as the President of the Commission determines to be appropriate, and the Commission may take any action the majority of the Commission deems advisable. f. If a motion to reconsider passes, the applicant may be charged a reasonable fee, to cover administrative costs, as established by the Commission. 18 Page 1 of I Justin Lucas From: Justin Lucas Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 10:55 AM To: Mindi Smith; Karie Glenn Subject: Saguaro Canyon #2 Swimming Pool Saguaro Canyon #2 Swimming Pool Area (CZC-05-130) has passed Planning requirements for occupancy. I did not sign the card because it was not on site. Justin S. Lucas Associate City Planner Meridian Planning Department 660 E. Watertower Lane 208.884.5533 208.888.6854 (fax) 10/1312006 PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT INSPECTION CHECKLIST COMMERCIAL/CZC SITES ~ This checklist should be attached to the inside cover of the CZC file at ALL times. Planner/Inspector Name: <-- Project Name: L et ~ ~~¢~ ,~J ~ P CZC File No.: ~P Contractor/Company Name: Phone No.: First Inspection Date: ~/~/ Second Inspection Date: / / Third Inspection Date: / / (NOTE.• If a third inspection is required, a fee of $60 must be submitted to the P&ZDept. be ore the inspection is done.) Landscape Plan Checklist Rer, ii?S;it; s: ~#'c~ZS6radtPc{7.4c!~nir, De}cur ,ite~ti Po?ic;er.~ Rer. 5:25: (1.i ~: ~Pc"iZ~3raii=P~lL.=/c{ir~ir,!1Jepurrrcnt Polices Sife Plan Checklist r , Post-Inspection Checklist -- P. t; r. 5: ZS%t~? .q:'l~cfl'.i3f~,<f-../'c<%.'I ffR: il;'-1);r~~tL'ti.7E'!il PU%LC7&i * The only instance that a CO maybe released prior to 100% completion of improvement is inclement weather, as determined by the Director. If weather is a factor, follow MCC 12-13-19-2.