ACHD Comments;~
,~
~ ~ ., I
s
~'.
;~ ,, :,:
i
>~j~
. ~;_~:,
`i
f;
~.;
,.
~,
f,
F•-F r
-~' ~-'
,;;
!rd
`.rYf;
I
~ ~~~
CHD
~io~wrwr~etl~o ~iLHicPi
September 3, 2008
TO: Idaho State University
1311 E. Central Dr.
Meridian, ID 83642
REP: Ed Daniels- Hummel Architects, PLLC
2785 Bogus Basin Rd.
Boise, ID 83702
SUBJECT: MCZC-08-082
I.S.U. Phase 1
1311 E. Central Dr.
Carol A. McKee, President
Sherry R. Huber, 1st Vice President
Dave Bivens, 2nd Vice President
John S. Franden, Commissioner
Rebecca W. Amold, Commissioner
On December 9, 2003, the Ada County Highway District acted on MPFP03-005 for Jabil Subdivision.
On October 5, 2007, the Ada County Highway District acted on MSHP-07-005 for Joint No. 2
Subdivision. The conditions and requirements also apply to MCZC-08-082. Both staff reports are
attached for reference.
• Prior to final approval you will need to submit construction plans to the ACHD
Development Review Section to insure compliance with the conditions identified above
and/or for traffic impact fee assessment. This is a separate review process that requires
direct plans submittal to the Development Review staff at the Highway District.
• A traffic impact fee will be assessed by ACRD and will be due prior to the issuance of a
building permit Contact ACHD Planning & Development Services at 387-6170 for
information regarding impact fees.
If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact this office at (208) 387-6177.
.Sincerely,
~~
Chelsee Kucera
Right-of-Way and Development Services
CC:
Project File
City of Meridian
Ada County Highway District • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 208-387-6100 • FX 345-7650 • www.achd.ada.id.us
s•
_M1_
~~<~' ,
~:
R :'}:
s ~;<
,~:~ ~,
~4~`.
~;_'.
5:-.
~3
}-,-
::
. 'I
~.; .
~~
,~R
rY, ~;~~
'~~~;
:,
~:
" .
~;
~-
~ `'.~
~~~.
~-
~_.
~~
~~
'~..F:~
A
~%~~rt
~~.,
Standard Conditions of Approval
1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of--way.
2. Private sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within any ACHD roadway or right-
of-way.
3. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be home
by the developer.
4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the
construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file
number) for details.
5. Comply with the District's Tree Planter Width Interim Policy.
6. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by
the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details.
7. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy
Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all
applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State
of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
8. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or
other. required permits), which incorporates any required design changes.
9. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements
of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
10. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction. The assessed
impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that time.
11. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The
applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant
shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking
ground within ACRD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in
the event any ACRD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction.
12. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and
signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative
of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written
confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District.
13. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other
regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises
the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a
waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the
time the change in use is sought.
1W
3x" ~. _,
-. 1T ti. j.
~ ~ ~
~ 'L*n ,
~~ ~
s
tiro ~<.~`.. ~~ ~ ..
i x.: ~ i,
~ ~.
rF~~
ter-'
mix, -~„.'i- _ -
,{~A f ,~7 yi_ ~
~f ~
,,i
r C ~''
~ei~"~ lF i~_1r4~ j ~.
H ~,+,M,y~y
v ~1q ~ -"
s~;o . i
i,
..y
~.._
~, 4 16 '.~ . ~~~
fi #~~ ,~ry
~7y~i
r_.-r ~~
~ ~~.~7
~~~ y z
~ rM
~,
mkA
y r_ ~ ~
i~ I
~~,
~}t
t; ~
!:
f~:~f:
~4:
~~
~-
;.. .
~;
z.,:
~.
~:
~~
~,
~~, ,
~_ ,:
;.~y;~,
;.,
~ ~,;
~•
~: ,
r::
,;
~~ -=`
~',
_,,:
4,
€,:°
f,
r'
8
f
JL
__
!:. 4
Request for Appeal of Staff Decision
1. Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the
final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not
properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error
of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or
enforcement of the ACRD Policy Manual.
a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged
the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs.
b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary
of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of the
decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision
being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state
the grounds for the appeal. The grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions
of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and-law relied upon and shall include a
written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of
appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection.
c. Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of
the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such
time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify
the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply and any modifications to the
decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing
on the appeal.
d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal
will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held
within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's
reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal
and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the
hearing.
e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or
reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being
appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at
the hearing.
r`~tr~ ~a3,.y, aNi<.
~F~
~`
5``'
~:
I
:;
€~~.~ ~. .
r: s l
~' '.
,,i
.. _ ,,,
Development Process Checklist
®Submit a development application to a City or to the County
®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD
®The ACHD Planning Review Division will receive the development application to review
®The Planning Review Division will do one of the following:
^Send a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific requirements at this time.
®Send a "Comply With" letter to the applicant stating that if the development is within a platted subdivision or part of
a previous development application and that the site specific requirements from the previous development also apply to
this development application.
^Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the
proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
^Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and
evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
®The Planning Review Division will hold a Technical Review meeting for all Staff and Commission Level reports.
^For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" or "Comply With" letter:
• The applicant should submit a set of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development Review
Division for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements required by ACHD,
then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee calculation.)
• The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the right-of-way, including,
but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts.
^Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval.
DID YOU REMEMBER:
Construction (Zone)
^ Driveway or Property Approach(s)
• Submit a "Driveway Approach Request form to Ada County Highway District (ACHD) Construction (for approval by
Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval.
^ Working in the ACHD Right-of--Way
• Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit Application" to
ACHD Construction -Permits along with:
a) Traffic Control Plan
b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you are
placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt.
Construction (Subdivisions)
^ Sediment ~ Erosion Submittal
• At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Con an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certfied Plan
Designer, must be turned into ACRD Construction -Subdivision to be reviewed and approved by the ACRD Drainage
Division.
^ Idaho Power Company
• ~c Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being scheduled.
^ Final Approval from Development Services
ACHD Construction -Subdivision must have received approval from Development Services prior to scheduling aPre-Con.
f
J ~ 3,, -
} _
.4
~:
l:
t
};,
! '-
4. ~ * ~~~
>~ C D ~ John S. Franden, President
:'" Rebecca W. Amold, Vice President
~,-~~ Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner
~onwwv'~ul~n ~~„~ Dave 8ivens, Commissioner
~: ~ Carol A. McKee, Commissioner
r~
~,_
'` `` October 5, 2007
~''
4 To: Joint School District No. 2
`~- 1303 E. Central Drive
"~~ Meridian, Idaho 83642
Subject: Joint NO 2 Subdivision
~;
This is a staff level approval of a short plat for Joint NO 2 Subdivision. This project proposes to
_ divide 33.315 acres into two office/educational building lots for the property located at 1303 East
Central Drive in Meridian. All of the street improvements (including curb, gutter, and sidewalk) exist
yµ^ on Central Drive abutting the site. In addition the driveway locations were previously approved with
'.: ~ the previous use (Jabil Building).
The District received and reviewed the required traffic impact study for the new public school site
-- and administrative center. The change in use of this site is projected to add approximately 650
' additional vehicle trips per day than the previous use, with the total daily trip generation of
i approximately 5,244 vehicles. No additional transportation improvements are needed to
<;,,.~j accommodate the traffic generated by the Jabil High School and Administrative Center. New
'z ` school speed limit signs, new school crosswalks, and new school crossing signs will be necessary
"~~~'~' for Central Drive adjacent to the project site, and these will be responsibility of the applicant. The
applicant should coordinate the signing and striping plan with District Traffic Services staff.
Additional ~ transportation analyses may be necessary once specific development plans are
developed for the vacant 100,800 square foot portion of the building.
. ;~ ~ The applicant will be required to pay all applicable platting and review fees prior to final approval.
~I
:~`~~' If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 208-387-6171.
Sincerely,
~~.,: ,-i
~..~..
' Lori Den Hartog
-: -
Planning Review Supervisor
k . ~i Right-of--way 8 Development Services
- ;
x, ~':~ CC: Project file, Construction Services, Utilities
`~ City of Meridian
-? Hummel Architects
2785 Bogus Basin Road
Boise, Idaho 83702
W&H Pacific
Ada County Highway District • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 208-387-6100 • FX 345-7650 • www.achd.ada.id.us
f
s a. ~
`~
np v
`/ '.
~
z~r K
.
~~ ~ ~~.`
~i ~
~ ~: y
~
,~x ~~,. _w.
ref'
,
,.
:.~_
- ~ t
-
~ ,~ r
~ r~
~~
i} ,3
~ _ a
,~~
~
tir
~ ,,~, -
r'
~ ~ ~~~ ~
~}y,
~~?,F`f~f~' ~~~ -
5'
~
~'4~e{~'.} "~ 8 ~P. i
~~ ~~' ~~ k
~,.
~ an} ~ - 'r
"j1
,:#S ~.:
M~
s~~4~Z yv hy~ x r ,,
~,.
'_
~..~_.? YY` ,
1~ ~~t6~ ~ J .
. ~.
~ R~
~ ~ Z.
<4. Y• _
~~~i •~
€~'~ ~ I Request for Appeal of Staff Decision
Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the final
`''' decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not properly
'c apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error of fact or
~~~, law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the
ACHD Policy Manual.
E'~`'
~;~ a) Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged the
applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs.
` ,'
`'~~ b) Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of
Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of the decision that is
~~ the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the
appellant by name, address and telephone number and stat
th
r;
~~:. e
e grounds for the appeal. The grounds
shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts
and law relied upon and shall include a written
argument in support of the appeal. The Commission
shall not consider a notice of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection.
~
- c) Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of the
filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of th
'
u ~ ~
,
~ e appeal, and may during such time meet with the
appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify the decision that is being
appealed. A copy of the reply and any modifications to the d
i
i
b
r
^ ~.
_~ ec
s
on
eing appealed will be provided to
the appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal.
~:<
€ '~" ~~
~~
;.~
d) Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal will
be noticed and scheduled on the Commission a
enda at
l
.
}
>
~ ~ g
a regu
ar meeting to be held within thirty (30)
days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's reply to the notice of appeal
A
,, ~
't
r .~; .
copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the
Commission at least one (1) week prior to the heari
ng.
sus"~' e) Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or reverse,
~, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being appealed, as such
action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at the hearing.
,_ ;
,,
`,~
__
~:
- Ada County Highway District • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 208-387-6100 • FX 345-7650 • www.achd.ada.id.us
k.~ t,
S ~~.~
~~ ~ ~ -
$~'~ rig:,
~~
~~~
~ .:~_.
~'it~. ~ ~ Y "2
~e
~.~
..Y..,
I
R
~'
~F' ,
f . ,
~~,_:
~a
3.~ ,
~ez'
",,y
~~
~. ..
y.~; . .~'~:~
s,, ,;1
Ada County Highway District
Right-of-Way & Development Department
Planning Review Division
This application does not require Commission action and is approved at the staff level on Tuesday,
December 9, 2003. Tech Review for this item was held with the representative on Thursday, December 4,
2003 per a-mail. Please refer to the attachment for appeal guidelines. Staff contact: Joyce Newton, 208-
387-6171 phone, 208-387-6393 fax, jnewton@achd.ada.id.us
File Numbers: MPFP03-005/Jabil Subdivision
Site address: 1303 East Central Drive (Parcel # 1)
560 Stratford Drive (Parcel # 2)
Owner/Applicant: Jabil Circuit Inc.
Bill Andre
10500 Martin Luther King Street North
St. Petersburg, Florida 33716
Representative: Briggs Engineering
Kent Brown
1800 W. Overland Road
Boise, Idaho 83705
Application Information:
The Ada County Highway District (ACRD) staff has received the above referenced application requesting
preliminary plat approval to plat atwo-lot industrial subdivision. The site has frontage on Central Drive and
Locust Grove Road in the City of Meridian. Proposed Lot #1 contains the existing Jabil facility and
associated parking lots, Lot #2 is currently undeveloped and being utilized as soccer fields including parking.
All of the roadway improvements such as curb, gutter and sidewalk were constructed with the previous
application for Central Drive.
Acreage: 52.84-acres (total)
Proposed Acreage of Lot 1: 33.47-acres
Proposed Acreage of Lot 2: 19.37-acres
Current Zoning: IL (Light Industrial)
Buildable Lots: 2
Common Lots: 0
Existing Buildings: 1
Vicinity Map
1
m P P P03.00lt/Jab tl 9obd ivtal on
~~~_
;~ -.
i "'
-`III
Y~2^,~ ,~..~;. i
;I
~:; ;.
~,:r. I
~~,
a> . '1
S` :~~
~.
a:..
~.
,,1... .
~;r~;.
i
y,, .,
~.~ s
_~;.
~~,~~_
r
;~~
4 ;r, , .
-;, ;
~``;
_.~~~ -
,_
~~`
A. Findings of Fact
1. Trip Generation:
The platting of the site is not estimated to generate any additional vehicle trips per day (2,268
existing) based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual.
The applicant is required to submit documentation of the °closing date" of the Jabil facility.
The vehicle trips per day will be calculated at the time a development application or the issuance of a
building permit is received by the District.
2. Impact Fees:
In July 1999, The Murray Company paid impact fees for the light industrial facility and soccer fields
(Impact Fee Certificate 99-0633) under file MSPR99-18.
In September 2000, Jabil Circuit Inc. paid impact fees for the addition to the light industrial facility
(Impact Fee Certificate 00-10662) under file MSPR00-22.
The impact fee will be calculated at the time a development application or the issuance of a building
permit is received by the District.
3. Traffic Impact Study:
A traffic impact study was not required with this application.
4. Site Information:
The site contains the existing Jabil facility (currently vacant) and associated parking lots, the
remainder of the site has no structures, and is currently being utilized as soccer fields including
parking.
5. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area:
a. North: Idaho State Police Facility
b. South: I-84
c. East: Single-Family Residential
d. West: Commercial
6. Impacted Roadways
East Central Drive:
Frontage:
Functional Street Classification:
Traffic count:
Speed limit:
South Locust Grove Road:
Frontage:
Functional Street Classification:
Traffic count:
Level of Service:
Speed limit:
2
Approximately 2,074-feet
Collector
No count available
25-MPH
Approximately 264-feet
Minor Arterial
South of Franklin Road was 1,783 on 12/3/02
Better than "C"
35-MPH
~v
}
~~
~
~
~
~
~x
hG%2`, 4k~ '~
r -E
~~. ~~ _
~. ~ r~
,~z~
t
S
~:,-
id
y,
y
4~ ?. ~,.,y''pu11 -
ff~
,
•
~. -
.~,
,5~~
~~
am'' ~
h S
• ~
~ ~
- ~-~ , ,.
-t
7,
fl l~t ~
~
l' x~~ ~~ ~,
~
r~,
if 5
_
Y
s
4
~
_ f~
;
a.
y
. ~'
7. Site History
District staff has not reviewed this site as an application or prepared a report in the past year.
However District staff has reviewed the site twice, once in 1999 and again in 2000. The Ada County
Highway District Commission reviewed and approved MSPR99-18 on Wednesday, May 12, 1999 and
MSPR00-022 on Wednesday, July 19, 2000.
8. Roadway Improvements Adjacent To and Near the Site including Existing Right-of--Way
Central Drive did not exist through the applicant's site in 1999. The 2015 Regional Transportation
Plan designated this segment of the Central Drive corridor as a future collector street. The applicant
proposed to extend Central Drive from its existing terminus to Locust Grove Road, approximately
150-feet north of Bentley Street on the east side of Locust Grove Road. The responsibility of the new
roadway was shared between the applicant and the Ada County Highway District because Central
Drive is a collector roadway.
At the May 12, 1999, Commission meeting, the Commission heard testimony from the applicant about
the street section proposed by District staff. The applicant at that time was under time constraints
and had engineering difficulties with constructing the street section proposed by District staff.
Therefore, the Commission allowed the applicant to construct a 41-foot collector roadway with curbs
and gutters on both sides and a 7-foot wide attached sidewalk on the south side only within 50-feet of
right-of--way. The developer was reimbursed for 3-feet of pavement widening and curb, and gutter on
the north side of the roadway only. The applicant was also reimbursed for a pro rata share of the
cost of the engineering for the 3-feet of additional pavement, curb and gutter, and drainage facilities
required for the improvements on the north side only. The applicant submitted a detailed analysis of
the additional costs for review and approval by District staff.
The applicant had a 50-foot wide easement in which to construct the extension of Central Drive from
Locust Grove Road to a point 350-feet west of Locust Grove Road. The applicant constructed the
extension from Locust Grove Road to a point 350-feet west of Locust Grove Road as a 28-foot wide
roadway without curbs, gutters, or sidewalks on either side within 50-feet of right-of-way. Staff
supported the proposed street section. The owner was not compensated for the right-of-way
dedicated for the subject segment of roadway.
There is approximately 100-feet of existing right-of-way on Locust Grove Road abutting the site.
There is approximately 76-feet of right-of--way from the west side of the centerline of Locust Grove
Road. The site has approximately 264-feet of frontage. The applicant should be required to
coordinate with ACHD and ITD for any additional right-of-way required for the project.
9. Existing Access to the Site
The following driveway locations were approved with MSPR99-18 in accordance with District policy.
- The eastern driveway on Central Drive is located 120-feet west of the east property line.
- The middle driveway on Central Drive is located 940-feet west of the east property line.
- The western two driveways on Central Drive are located 1,900-feet west of the east property
line and 2,500-feet respectively.
The applicant is not proposing any additional driveways with this application.
3
"~' , 4 S t
i
•b
e` ni3eek-KS~c.,,~.`. ,
~~ ~ vin r~;6F ~.~+ sr<c ~ ~ v
~. „ x ~
~,nrx~`'~vr r 4:;. -~ rs ~ s 5s ~ ~~`~ACr:I%b'e
r i
`t ' _ , a,7z ,~, v~ ,,,
1f ~. i' J~M ~..t9 1bi74 !'t
. a,~..A,•ycv i.,
5~^'~. .~ l~,i#~+~..r ~~C r.r .e.t M~a ~~l.±!- ~~,yR~,~•~.
__t,~ "~ Kµ`1
- b. uu,, ',c~
xi k t Er ri
- n r c
~:a. J`.'L r.. M .~~
R '
~w.3' f ~{ r t , ~ ~, ~ ~tJf
.~ ~ x:,4i ~• ~~
i :..'k .u t 4 ~
cit {
yid 1' .~ rFY~21'R51~ ~ ~'%T~'.,'."~.~+"5 t~`F~.t~~rr+
~ :~ ys,~a~Tyct{3 G
~~ i~ of i +1~ 3 it a ~~~~ .
2 h ~M1t ~t1 ~y~~k..F
m
a
y }~I 1,,
t '
4y
~t .
= y~. ,..
(~ ~11Yy
Ld7G^G'!W~ 4 _ 's C
t7-Y1 1
1 ' ,~,.f`S ~. ~,~
.~~ ~ Y -.
~
k Zi
~1pp
,y ~[N -~7 L
;~-k s~F~~~k
,:
i -
yy ~~
~ ~
_ -
~5
Z~
} a~rY~ 1
!?Mtrc.,2~ tai
~:'.
fi,
h;
~a : _ 10. Capital Improvements Plan/Five Year Work Program
~~~~' Five-Year Work Program 2004-2008: Locust Grove Road from Franklin Road south to Bentley Street
~. is to be widened from two-lanes to five-lanes. The scope of work includes curb, gutter and sidewalk.
{~-`=,` The project excludes the overpass area of touchdown to touchdown. Note: Timing may change to
'' : ~ ` match overpass project.
Capital Improvement Plan 2003: Locust Grove Road, Overland Road/Franklin Road Overpass:
~~ '`i Construct overpass over 1-84, 500-feet north of Overland Road to Central/Bentley, at 4/5-lanes.
"`~` ~ ~ Meridian will be contributing to right-of-way and ITD. Scope of work; 2004/5 right-of-way acquisition
~~~~`'' and construction 2006.
~:. ; B. Findings for Consideration
~~ 1. Right-of-Way
District policy requires 70-feet of right-of--way on collector roadways (Figure 72-F1 B). This right-of-
way width allows for the construction of a 3-lane roadway with curb, gutter, 5-foot wide detached
~: .;.
=`'St'~ sidewalks and bike lanes.
Central Drive: The Commission has directed staff to only purchase right-of-way on roadways that are
` in the Five-Year Work Program or the Capital Improvements plan. The Central Drive is not listed as
{ `~ ' a proposed project in the District's currently adopted Five-Year Work Program or in the currently
f' ``-' adopted 20-year Capital Improvements Plan.
~' `4~ District policy requires 96-feet of right-of-way on arterial roadways (Figure 72-F1 B). This right-of-way
allows for the construction of a 5-lane roadway with curb, gutter, 5-foot concrete detached sidewalks
" ` ~ and bike lanes.
k`,.t,
Locust Grove Road: There is approximately 100-feet of existing right-of-way on Locust Grove Road
~~_ abutting the site. From the west side of the centerline of Locust Grove Road there is approximately
76-feetright-of-way abutting the 264feet of frontage.
~,:t The applicant should be required to coordinate with the District and ITD for any additional right-of-way
' required for the project. The right-of-way purchase and sale agreement and deed must be completed
'~~<~• _~, and signed by the applicant prior to scheduling the final plat for signature by the ACHD Commission
~~.':;'~I or prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up
,. ,
to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The
owner will be paid the fair market value of the right-of-way dedicated which is an addition to existing
ACHD right-of-way if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to
- . breaking ground, in accordance with the ACHD Ordinance in effect at that time (currently Ordinance
;~ #198), if funds are available.
2. Sidewalk
,'
3 : ~~ District policy requires 5-foot wide (minimum) concrete sidewalk on all collector streets (7204.6.5).
District policy requires 5-foot wide (minimum) concrete sidewalk on all collector roadways and arterial
~:~ roadways (7204.7.2).
': ~ k
t s
4
i,.
Y '...ti.
r J,
ih~
ff'
i
~~_
;':~~'~'
~,
I!~
..
<,u
,4: _..
°'f.`
:,
;::~a i
~.i
~I
t ;
..
=,~
;~~~,
.,~,
3. Public Rights-of--way Trust Fund
District policy 7203.8, if the District determines that it is necessary or desirable to defer making some
or all of the improvements, the Developer shall contribute the estimated value of the improvements to
the Public Rights-of-way Trust Fund.
In lieu of constructing the improvements, The Murray Company provided a $7, 000.00 deposit to the
Public Rights-of--Way Trust Fund (#00-007) for the cost of constructing a 5-foot wide concrete
sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel (approximately 350-feet) prior to District approval
of MSPR99-78.
4. Street Sections
District policy 72-F1 B requires collector roadways to be constructed as a 46-foot street section with
vertical curb, gutter and 5-foot detached (or 7-foot attached) concrete sidewalk within 70-feet of right-
of-way with parking prohibited on both sides.
5. Minor Improvements
District policy 7203.6 states, minor improvements to existing improved streets in or next to a
proposed development may be required. These improvements are to correct deficiencies or replace
deteriorated facilities. Included are sidewalk construction or replacement: curb and gutter construction
or replacement; replacement of unused driveways with standard curb, gutter and sidewalk;
installation of pedestrian ramps; pavement repairs; signs; traffic control devices; and other similar
items.
C. Special Recommendation to the Applicant and the City of Meridian
1. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that Tenants occupying the
proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and
provide an annual report to ACRD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the
Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Commuteride at
387-6160 for further information.
2. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, it is recommended that the tenants occupying
the proposed building(s) be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association
(TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that
includes this site or is adjacent to this development.
3. A Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization
(TMO) is formed with a coordinator that works as a liaison between businesses and private and public
transportation providers to increase the use of alternative transportation and other trip reduction
measures (shuttle buses, bus pass programs, vanpools, car pools, bicycle and walking enhancements).
4. An annual survey will be required of the TMA/TMO to monitor participation in alternative
transportation programs and forwarded to the ACRD Commuteride Office.
5
~.~ ', t ,
~t~ ~d-
i'a`'
{, <;
>, •i, '
~..r. ,
~,
_; .
~~_yp
~;
~_,
~ `I
~~
'~~_
D. Site Specific Conditions of Approval
1. The required street improvements and dedication of right-of--way have been completed with the
previous applications for this site abutting Central Drive.
2. The following driveway locations were approved with MSPR99-18 in accordance with District policy.
- The eastern driveway on Central Drive is located 120-feet west of the east property line.
- The middle driveway on Central Drive is located 940-feet west of the east property line.
- The western two driveways on Central Drive are located 1,900-feet west of the east property
line and 2,500-feet respectively.
"~'
~,,
a.
Y~';-
~~
'`~
>;~:'
''.
~_
3. The applicant shall be required to coordinate with the District and ITD for any additional right-of--way
required for the project abutting the site on Locust Grove .Road. The right-of--way purchase and sale
agreement and deed must be completed and signed by the applicant prior to scheduling the final plat
for signature by the ACHD Commission or prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required
permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of--way dedication
after receipt of all requested material. The owner will be paid the fair market value of the right-of--way
dedicated which is an addition to existing ACHD right-of--way if the owner submits a letter of
application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with the ACHD
Ordinance in effect at that time (currently Ordinance #198), if funds are available.
4. The District has a $7,000.00 deposit to the Public Rights-of--Way Trust Fund (#00-007) for the cost of
constructing a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel
(approximately 350-feet) prior to District approval of MSPR99-18.
5. Other than the access point(s) specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to
Central Drive and Locust Grove Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this
application, shall be stated on the final plat.
6. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
E. Standard Conditions of Approval
1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of--way.
2. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne
by the developer.
3. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the
construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file
number) for details.
4. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by
the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with .file numbers) for details.
6
xti::;.:
~ ./~:
is
„n~',
~~
°~;~ ~ : ii
~; ~~
`_I
~_ i
`~':''I
P ,'
<~
~~
_.
`~;~ _ ''
p;~;
- ;;:~
ry~r s
x
5. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy
Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all
applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State
of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
6. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or
other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes.
7. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements
of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
8. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with
Ordinance #198, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance.
9. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of--way. The
applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant
shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking
ground within ACHD right-of--way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in
the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction.
10. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and
signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative
of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written
confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District.
11. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is -the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other
regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises
the Highway District of its .intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a
waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the
time the change in use is sought.
F. Conclusions of Law
1. The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are
satisfied.
2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity
impacted by the proposed development.
Attachments
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site Plan
3. Appeal Guidelines
7
;<.
4:';.,
>" ~-
,,
Xf
~..'
~~}~ _
t5 y
~~ Request for Appeal of Staff Decision
';
~ ~'~`~' 1. Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant of the
°,,1 final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS Manager did not
~~ properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts presented, made an error
"'r''" I of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and capriciously in the interpretation or
enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual.
~~.
~ ` ~ " II a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be charged
~- ~ the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative costs.
=~"' :~
"` ~ ~ ~ b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with the Secretary
~x . z
_>~~ ~i of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working days from the date of the
'"~fiF:''" decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of appeal shall refer to the decision
being appealed, identify the appellant by name, address and telephone number and state
~~
~-;F
~~ ~ me grounas ror the appeal. i ne grounas snau mauae a wnnen summary or me provisions
of the policy relevant to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a
'> ' j written argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice of
~; .,-.'I appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection.
~`~ `-tt `kk'
Y 2 t c. Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the date of
,
~ ~,~ ~
~
the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and may during such
"' time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may also consider and/or modify
x' the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the reply, and any modifications to the
~..,: , , decision being appealed will be provided to the appellant prior to the Commission hearing
on the appeal.
.; .
5?. .
fir' ~'='I d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of the appeal
~,~ will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular meeting to be held
ft:,
~
R
?~~ within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant of the ROWDS Manager's
~
'
, reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision being appealed, the notice of appeal
_ :
? and the reply shall be delivered to the Commission at least one (1) week prior to the
~~>:
~ hearing.
e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm or
Via; ; : = >! reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the decision being
`~ ` appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and evidence presented at
~~ ~' the hearing.
~.
j,/,'.~ Appeal Guidelines