ACHD Comments-ft"~;
'; ~~r P_
,S `... r
•ei~';fa`.~~
t ~~~
;, ;:`
eft
~~
~~1=~ '`%
,_
„~ ~~:
~:~~,
..;,~~
~~
sr.-
„~:
4:. `.,
~a
._ „
,_a,4,
~~
~~ ?}
~,
'x..`
~rL+
r
~~
~,~
}
~:;{ ,
s
~~~
Carol A. McKee, President
"~ CHD ~"
Sherry R. Huber, 1~ Vice President
Dave Bivens, 2"d Vice President
~in~etl~.o ~~ ~~~~~ John S. Franden, Commissioner
~ebecca W. Amold, Commissioner
~ ~t. + ~ '"
October 31, 2008 ~ety ®f
~S~~~de~~ ~der~dAa~a
~, ~„~~~
~~~~.
To: Alex Stricharskiy
4349 W. Quaker Ridge Dr.
Meridian, ID 83646
Subject: MCZC-08-068/MALT-08-019
1422 N. Meridian Rd.
Photography Studio on .2 acres =
~'
On October 31, 2008, the Ada County Highway District Commission acted on your application for
the above referenced project. The attached report lists site-specific requirements, conditions of
approval and street improvements, which are required.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (208) 387-6171.
Sincerely,
Kristy Scovill
Planner I
Right-of-Way & Development Services
Ada County Highway District
CC: Project file
Utilities
City of Meridian
Mike Fairchild
Ada County Highway District • 3775 Adams Street • Garden City, ID • 83714 • PH 208-387-6100 • FX 345-7650 • www.achd.ada.id.us
Right-of-Way & Developfraent Services Dev~trizenr
~ _
~~~~ ~~~
H
eo~~cx~
Project/File:
M CZC-08-068/MALT-08-019
This is a cert~cate of zoning compliance application for a photography studio
and design firm on .2 acres.
Lead Agency: City of Meridian
Site address: 1422 N. Meridian Road
Staff Approval: October 31, 2008
Applicant: Alex Stricharskiy
4349 W. Quaker Ridge Dr.
Meridian, ID 83646
Representative: Mike Fairchild
1518 Mulligan Street
Middleton, ID 83644
Staff Contact:
Tech Review:
Kristy Scovill
Phone: 387-6171
E-mail: kscovillt'c~achd.ada.id.us
October 28, 2008 (via email)
Application Information:
Acreage: .2
Current Zoning: C-C
Building Square Footage: 936
Commercial Lots: 1
A. Findings of Fact
Existing Conditions
1. Site Information: There is one single family house on the site.
2. Description of Adjacent Surreundina o~pa~
Direction Land Use Zoning
North Communi Business District C-C
South Communit Business District C-C
East Communit Business District C-C
West Low/Medium Residential District R-4
3. Existing Roadway Improvements and Right-of--Way Adjacent To and Near the Site
• Meridian Road is improved with 2 trafFc lanes, 33-feet of pavement, and no curb, gutter, or
sidewalk within 70-feet of right-of--way (40-feet from centerline) abutting the site.
4. Existing Access: There is one defined access point to this property located off of Meridian
Road.
MCZC-08-068/MALT-08-019
F
~~
~S
h; .
>t-.
~=
~, ;
T:.
a _
-. .
µ4~~
1
5. Site History: ACHD has not previously reviewed this site for a development
application.
Development Impacts
6. Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 31 additional vehicle trips per
day (10-existing), based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip
Generation Manual.
7. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of
any building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the
impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that time.
8. Existing Condition of Area Roadways:
Roadway Frontage Functional Trafgc Count Level of Speed
Classification Service* Limit
Meridian Road 210' Principal 10,787 south of Better 25 MPH
Arterial Fairview Ave. on than "C"
2/12/08
H~cepiaple level or service ror a two-lane pnncipa~ artena~ roadway is "E" (15,500 VTD).
9. Capital Improvements Plan/Five Year Work Plan
The following improvements are listed in the District's Capital Improvements Plan (CIP).
• Meridian Road between Cheny Lane and Ustick Road is listed to be widened to 5-lanes in
the timeframe between the 2019 and 2028.
The following improvements are listed in the District's Five Year Work Plan.
• The first phase of the Split Corridor project, from I-84 to Franklin is listed to begin in 2009.
This project will widen Meridian Road and Main Street to 3-lanes, each will be one-way
traffic.
• The second phase of the Split Corridor project, from Franklin Road to Cherry Lane/Fairview
Avenue is listed in the current Five Year Work Plan to begin in 2012. This project will widen
Meridian Road and Main Street to 5-lanes with two-way traffic.
B. Findings for Consideration
1. Meridian Road
Right-of-Way Policy: District policy requires 96-feet of right-of-way on arterial roadways
(Figure 72-F1 B). This right-of--way allows for the construction of a 5-lane roadway with curb,
gutter, 5-foot concrete detached sidewalks and bike lanes.
Applicant Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct curb, gutter and 4.5-foot
attached concrete sidewalk along Meridian Road abutting the site.
°'~~~ Staff Comment/Recommendation: Based on the current concept design for the Split Corridor
Project, it has been determined that this segment of Meridian Road will be constructed as a 5-
x: lane roadway section with two travel lanes in each direction and a center turn lane. This 5-lane
-; `~ roadway section will be constructed within a constrained amount of right-of--way, 80-feet instead
of the standard 96-feet. Because 40-feet of right-of-way cun-ently exist from the centerline of
-f Meridian Road, no additional right-of--way dedication will be required.
The applicant will be required to complete one of the following:
• If the applicant chooses to construct curb, gutter, and attached sidewalk abutting
°'~_ Meridian Road, then the applicant will be required to construct the improvements a
minimum of 31-feet from the centerline of Meridian Road (measured centerline to top
2 MCZC-08-068/MALT-08-019
k~ .
%sa ~•<<4~ a~ ~.
~[~~k~3q*.n-.~ .}~`.~~ r_.c.'v~.' ...r,{{w a '<} a.. .. ... 4 r '~'J. x i. ~Wo-•.- C..g.~.~rv.::`r ~;~'~.~..;s:~'""'.'.i~y.~' ,y;.,_..
~ ~ a .~~~~.I r. . ~~ .ax ~i~ ~v..3 -^~.ii:?~w.~ Mt~.~C`~ ~`"_;cF ~a't'~ r~^.:'%r9 a. ~~i,
' •' '~=. ~ „• :R.~~' 1 ,..~,t:.r,.,, ill
~~~:
back of curb). With either a 5-foot wide detached or a 7-foot wide attached concrete
sidewalk.
• If the applicant chooses not to construct curb and gutter, then the applicant will be
required to construct a 5-foot wide detached sidewalk located a minimum of 36-feet from
:-~; the centerline of the roadway.
=`'" • Provide the District with a road trust in the amount of $1,650 (60 ft (frontage) x $25/per
linear foot x 10%) for the future construction of the sidewalk as part of the Meridian Split
Corridor Project.
2. Driveways
.~~ Successive Driveway Policy: District policy 72-F5, requires driveways located on collector or
arterial roadways with a speed limit of 25 to align or offset a minimum of 105-feet from any
~:~;! existing or proposed driveway.
Driveway Paving Policy: Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance
y~; ;; problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy,
7207.9.1, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-feet
r ;`' into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers with 15-
foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge.
-<~.
Commercial Driveway Width Policy: District policy 7207.9.3 restricts commercial driveways
,~;, with daily traffic volumes over 1,000 vehicles to a maximum width of 36-feet. Most commercial
~$~~~?' driveways will be constructed as curb-cut type facilities if located on local streets. Curb return
type driveways with 15-foot radii will be required for driveways accessing collector and arterial
roadways.
"'~ '~ ~ Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct a 20-foot wide driveway
located at the north property line. The applicant is proposing to provide cross access to both
~'~° the north and south properties. At the time that the properties to the north and south redevelop,
the applicant is proposing to change the access onto Meridian Road as a right-in only.
i
s~
r-~
,.;
~> .
>::
~,;,
;;;
i Y;.
Staff CommentlRecommendation: The applicant's proposal does not meet District offset
policy. However, due to the existing configuration of successive driveways and limited frontage,
staff recommends a modification of policy to allow the driveway at its proposed location. The
applicant will be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-feet into the site
beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers with 15-foot radii
abutting the existing roadway edge. Staff is supportive of the cross accesses. The applicant
will be required to provide the District with written documentation of the cross access
agreements once they are in place.
3. Tree Planters
Tree Planter Policy: The District's Tree Planter Width Policy prohibits all trees in planters less
than 8-feet in width without the installation of root barriers. Class II trees may be allowed in
planters with a minimum width of 8-feet, and Class I and Class III trees may 6e allowed in
planters with a minimum width of 10-feet.
4. Other Access
Meridian Road is classified as a principal arterial roadway. Other than the access specifically
approved with this application, direct lot access to this roadway is prohibited.
3
MCZC-08-068/MALT-08-019
:~~~, ':-
3';
r'f~k
.~y,
~,
„„
,:~:.,
'>
...
~~~
f '> `'~
' ':
~'.
C. Site Specific Conditions of Approval
1. Complete one of the following:
• Construct one half of a 31-foot street section with curb, gutter, and attached sidewalk
abutting Meridian Road with the sidewalk located a minimum of 31-feet from. the
centerline of Meridian Road (measured centerline to top back of curb) with either a 5-foot
wide detached or a 7-foot wide attached concrete sidewalk.
• Construct a 5-foot wide detached sidewalk a minimum of 36-feet from the centerline of
Meridian Road.
• Provide the District with a road trust in the amount of $1,650 (60 ft (frontage) x $25/per
linear foot x 70%) for the future construction of the sidewalk along Meridian Road as part
of the Meridian Split Corridor Project.
2. Construct one 20-foot wide driveway located at the north property line. Pave the driveway its
full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway and
install pavement tapers with 15-foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge.
3. Provide written documentation of the cross access agreements with the properties to the north
and south.
4. Other than the access specifically approved with this application, direct lot access to Meridian
Road is prohibited.
5. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval.
®. Standard Conditions of Approval
1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way
2. Private sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within any ACRD roadway or
right-of-way.
3. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be
borne by the developer.
4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during
the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280
(with file number) for details.
5. Comply with the District's Tree Planter Width Interim Policy.
6. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing
by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for
details.
7. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy
Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and
all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in
the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans.
8. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit
(or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes.
9. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable
requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy.
10. Payment of applicable road impact fees is required prior to building construction. The assessed
impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that time.
4 MCZC-08-068/MALT-08-019
~', ~
i. ~-
~tFy4 z~ ;~ ~ ,~
E . ~ :;F
1'.
~ }: t.l 1.:~~, 1:.s.
~~
r
.~,;
0. t
1 J''
~ f Y
y
~}
2
k '? ~.,.
`, 4
~! ~.
t
~ .,
i_
i
~+
L
} ~;
,
5
~ ~
4
11. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of--way. The
applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The
applicant shall be required to call DIGLINE (1-811-342-1585) at least two full business days
prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of--way. The applicant shall contact ACRD Traffic
Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during
any phase of construction.
12. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing
and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized
representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to
obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District.
13. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this
application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or
other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in
interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject
property unless awaiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant
to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought.
E. Conclusions of Law
1. The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of
Approval are satisfied.
2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an
undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the
proposed development.
5 MCZC-08-068/MALT-08-019
Attachments
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site Plan
3. Utility Coordination
4. Development Process Checklist
''~
<,.
~' to':.
~~:: .
¢ ,F;!
iC ~4'.
~_ .:
', t
r,,
._
~~
~~
~~
~--- PROPOSID FUTURE CROSS ACCES
- ---------------------1-
~~
~~~
o~g
~~
-~ __ --- tea T ~l'f.! . S'~~~ y z~'y~, ~T
,~, :; pppp -w ~
~ ~ ~ I ` '• i'y
1~ ~,0
y
4
p
~
•
~~ ~
S~
F.f' ~@3~
5 , ,~••'' ,
,
~ ~ q
~ 0
~
u ~• n
j
~
~ ~')
~ \ i ~
E ~ ~r.5~
~ ~ `~ •
~
G
~ 'ar
~ N ~
n'y n r~.~a o
~ Y'f'' -•I~ t •M,
pry;{
"
"S •2o"ry;;Bte~YS .
'
,,
~
r
P }.w~. '[~ .1
~
1.
~
7t i pl .
N
y'~
'.5' oo`.b+l ~.~'. F~~te
t h•ir~`y^ ij~'•P t
QQ
3
___ ~'tf
~ a~~•4•~~'
U vk eo '~{4 `~0:.
'r'i'
~ ~~•~,~ :y
s3A~4•°~~
' dr .
es
.
_
~
~-- ,
~ ~
I ~
j
I
I ~ ~
~
I
~
I .
~
~
------------ -----------~
i
PL. 60'-0°
~ ~~~~~~
6~~~~~ ~ ~
aag~~~ ~ ~
~a~~a~
maer,rsa e• ~ ~y
~Ofl
o~ ~
$~
'~~ p
ro
O
~ ~
do ACS
~~ O~O ~~
~~ y
~~~~~~
-PROPOSED FUTURE CROSS ACCESS --~~
~~~~gr~~~~~~ y ~
~ ~ ~ ~~~~' ~' o
~~ ~ ~a ~ ~ o
~ am
~ ~ zv
~~; ~
~~
M CZC-08-068/MALT-08-019
;~.~ 4. . .
Y ~ h '~ R-
t
~k i'^ii '~<.
1 ) .l
r5 'o' 'S s t '~. 1~~
,E7~:'e~
1
"t ~; t t
,j-
~;I
~ ~ , ~ -. ~;
}.
~-
Y i~
~
~~
Y
u.
~.
~`
3t
iT ~'~
v
°
~` r
x
'r
'h
~. 1.
- i
l
~~ - F ._
=
1' '1
R
~•
~•
'
c~ r.
~ ~
H=
f5'~.
i'
X
;~
f •::
~" { ,
~`
_
*
~.- J
4'iR
~~~~: Ada County Utility Coordinating Council
<,t
t:.
Developer/Local Improvement District
~ Right of Way Improvements Guideline Request
~'.
T^,
~` Purpose: To develop the necessary avenue for proper not cation to utilities of local highway
~,.~
~.f and road improvements, to help the utilities in budgeting and to clarify the already existing process.
kti•
~;. _`
1) Notification: Within five (5) working days upon notification of required right of way
°~ ' improvements by Highway entities, developers shall provide written notification to the affected
,'~y utility owners and the Ada County Utility Coordinating Council (UCC). Notification shall include
but not be limited to, project limits, scope of roadway improvements/project, anticipated
construction dates, and any portions critical to the right of way improvements and coordination
of utilities.
2) Plan Review: The developer shall provide the highway entities and all utility owners with
~ '''' ~ preliminary project plans and schedule a plan review conference. Depending on the scale of
~_•_., Y' utility improvements, a plan review conference may not be necessary, as determined by the
5 ~ utility owners. Conference notification shall also be sent to the UCC. During the review meeting
the developer shall notify utilities of the status of right of way/easement acquisition necessary
t:; ~ for their project. At the plan review conference each company shall have the right to appeal,
~. ~ adjust and/or negotiate with the developer on its own behalf. Each utility shall provide the
.>-:-' developer with a letter of review indicating the costs and time required for relocation of its
facilities. Said letter of review is to be provided within thirty calendar days after the date of the
~;,'~ plan review conference.
'~
~~
-, 3) Revisions: The developer is responsible to provide utilities with any revisions to preliminary
~,
~'
l
Utili
i
~
p
ans.
t
es may request an updated plan review meeting if revisions are made in the
preliminary plans which affect the utility relocation requirements. Utilities shall have thirty days
~
:;;
after receiving the revisions to review and comment thereon.
~~' ~ 4) Final Notification: The developer will provide highway entities, utility owners and the UCC with
',:.:i final notification of its intent to proceed with right of way improvements and include the
i anticipated date work will commence. This notification shall indicate that the work to be
-~,~ > performed shall be pursuant to final approved plans by the highway entity. The developer shall
:d _` schedule a preconstruction meeting prior to right of way improvements. Utility relocation activity
wi, shall be completed within the times established during the preconstruction meeting, unless
otherwise agreed upon.
~~:
j-' ~`~ Notification to the Ada County UCC can be sent to: 50 S. Cole Rd. Boise 83707, or Visit
iducc.com for a-mail notification information.
-~ ~
':: _;
~~', ~ 7 MCZC-08-068/MALT-08-019
a.. ,
?_~ ~3 ~~~~ ~ s
~~ ,;~ t.
{ ~~
? ~.
~~~--~r~~ z4~~~ ~::
~ a x t~ , s t,~
~ :~
n
~z4.. 4t, _~ ~~ ~
~ ~~ `
~iL yS'-,f a'` ~1 ~C, F'
<~,• ~
?4 ~".'~ ? ~~T ttt Ir
~ ~Z:r~ Y .'h b. l~ f
Y ~ ~ F&R 1
t ~-~~ t
4~} ~'K t.y-r ~' Ys~{yy~
~/' h t f 'Y'~
~,
21. _~FY j~ ~
Y 1'rv-4~1"yy ~.
4~ ~ ,
n`, ~'' c 3 w;
1 1(a
s , . ,~:
d°
4M1'' ff~~ /~x ~ >
.~ may; .. '
1 <'~C ~ y
~. ~ i. ,~
"~ ~( m
~" ~~ a'Ci ~`^ k FT ~ t
~~c~~~*'
~~" k'~~
~ Z~
z~ fi ~
z~r' ~~iF~,~4ti~~~.
~ ~,r ~~~~
~[an.c~,w. ti .
~. ]!:
~t?y7
~~.~
~''
Development Process Checklist
®Submit a development application to a City or to the County
®The City or the County will transmit the development application to ACRD
®The ACRD Planning Review Division will receive the development application to review
®The Planning Review Division will do one of the following:
~23'~
::~:,
~~`;~
,~ ~.:
~'::
~.
~~`:
w.-
.'~_ `.
;.
',~'s~
~::.~~,.
_,-
;',
^Send a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific requirements at this time
^Send a "Comply With" letter to the applicant stating that if the development is within a platted subdivision or
part of a previous development application and that the site specific requirements from the previous development
also apply to this development application.
®Write a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and
evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
^Write a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and
evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy.
®The Planning Review Division will hold a Technical Review meeting for all Staff and Commission Level reports.
^For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" or "Comply With" letter:
• The applicant should submit two (2) sets of engineered plans directly to ACRD for review by the Development
Review Division for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements
required by ACRD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee calculation.)
• The applicant is required to get a permit ftom Construction Services (ACRD) for ANY work in the right-of--way,
including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts.
^Pay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval.
DID YOU REMEMBER:
Construction (Zone)
^ Driveway or Property Approach(s)
• Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to Ada County Highway District (ACRD) Construction (for approval by
Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval.
^ Working in the ACRD Right-of-Way
• Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit
Application" to ACRD Construction -Permits along with:
a) Traffic Control Plan
b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you
are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt.
Construction (Subdivisions)
^ Sediment 8 Erosion Submittal
• At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Con an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified
Plan Designer, must be turned into ACRD Construction -Subdivision to be reviewed and approved by the ACRD
Drainage Division.
^ Idaho Power Company
• Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being
scheduled.
^ Final Approval from Development Services
ACRD Construction -Subdivision must have received approval from Development Services prior to scheduling aPre-Con.
s a
M CZC-08-068/MALT-08-019
.' ,>.
~r~=-
~t ~~~~
~~~. ~ ~ ~,
~? ?,f ' ~'~~, .
_. .C'~?
~.°~
F.: ,.
r:!S .+ M
~ `.. ~
Request for Appeal of Staff Decision
'' ' 1. Appeal of Staff Decision: The Commission shall hear and decide appeals by an applicant
,~r~
~ of the final decision made by the ROWDS Manager when it is alleged that the ROWDS
.;
~,~
Manager did not properly apply this section 7101.6, did not consider all of the relevant facts
presented, made an error of fact or law, abused discretion or acted arbitrarily and
Li . ;
,: ~_ capriciously in the interpretation or enforcement of the ACHD Policy Manual.
€'' a. Filing Fee: The Commission may, from time to time, set reasonable fees to be
charged the applicant for the processing of appeals, to cover administrative
~: costs.
b. Initiation: An appeal is initiated by the filing of a written notice of appeal with
~~'~7 the Secretary of Highway Systems, which must be filed within ten (10) working
days from the date of the decision that is the subject of the appeal. The notice of
e,. '~
,~_ , appeal shall refer to the decision being appealed, identify the appellant by name,
address and telephone number and state the grounds for the appeal. The
~` '`' grounds shall include a written summary of the provisions of the policy relevant
to the appeal and/or the facts and law relied upon and shall include a written
t ",= argument in support of the appeal. The Commission shall not consider a notice
-> of appeal that does not comply with the provisions of this subsection.
""~` c. Time to Reply: The ROWDS Manager shall have ten (10) working days from the
date of the filing of the notice of appeal to reply to the notice of the appeal, and
~~- may during such time meet with the appellant to discuss the matter, and may
- also consider and/or modify the decision that is being appealed. A copy of the
reply and any modifications to the decision being appealed will be provided to the
;.
appellant prior to the Commission hearing on the appeal.
d. Notice of Hearing: Unless otherwise agreed to by the appellant, the hearing of
~:- the appeal will be noticed and scheduled on the Commission agenda at a regular
~~ .
-
meeting to be held within thirty (30) days following the delivery to the appellant
of the ROWDS Manager's reply to the notice of appeal. A copy of the decision
~~' . being appealed, the notice of appeal and the reply shall be delivered to the
~." '
5. Commission at least one (1) week prior to the hearing.
~~ ~- e. Action by Commission: Following the hearing, the Commission shall either affirm
or reverse, in whole or part, or otherwise modify, amend or supplement the
decision being appealed, as such action is adequately supported by the law and
~~;: evidence presented at the hearing.
~: ; ~;~x
~:~:
-~.
~~., ,;
.,
4 ~ ,
9
M CZC-08-068/MALT-08-019
A ,.,
-~a .t ~A'..3
! ,,, ~. > 1 Ly'. r lit
~i
~ ~
~ ~i:~; t
i (Z~~i,3Y ~ri
YW "'tt 7~
~ ~ x"~
~~~}7~yhyy k ~' 'Y+~ a ty
FS,
r ~ ti
~~ .~ ~/ Y
t d ~~.;
,r. ~' -: ~~~'~
~~ y ~' `%
.,ray ~`~~.:
,,.t _
+~~~~~~
~, ~ ~ r .
~':a
!-M* e
~~~ .:
` s ct~ d
, 9 Y ~ c ,wri
`~ 4 ~ k
'~ ~~;
:, n
r'Y t ~d d 1 ~k ~5~~