1978 01-16u
Meridian City Hall - Planning and Zoning
January 16, 1978
Meeti g called to order by the P eside t, Willard Rowley
Membe s Present: Don Shar , Jim Kling Lee Mitchell
Anne a uric an ur ip in came in a e
Other Attending: Max Boe 'ger; Lee R Stucker; Gene lJrigh ; Nii e Fro ;
Steven 4 . os ; o man u er; u ers ns
Curin the pre-hearing disc ussio the one ch~utge of R-4 to D-2 iscus ed which
wou ow you ry proces. ing.
The f eling of the ommiss'
1. No Central Sewer n wa
ails a
le is s o e enie
2. Water supply if p
Surroundin r e 'vate
'es would
ake t be questionable
i t o of use unacc
tab
e
4. Present structures
Prover h t tan not
a d ccent
would ble
b rd to et if
ossi
le at
all.
6. Roadway access wo d be on a ain thorofare (Locus Gro e Roa )
Mr. W lliams c c f rev enue f matchin
funds
T~;r. L to cover industrial s
van stated that he i udie
tte for
n he Community.
ut toeetk
to '
es f th
area d how to prepare fo Indu trial growth.
The M:
reeue tion was made by Bur
t that the City Counc Pipk
' n and
u~t seconded by Don Shar
F tha
s Qf the
Secti ommission
n 04 of
Publi
Econ 'dorks and Economic
'c e t of
•_MMer 1965
di~tl ~o be used for the p nose of fu thering
M t' n ~_
It wa explained that this as a State and Local h'.atch prog am
20~ would be taken p by the S ate 5% by City f ds.
Mike
of
th rost, representing N
Sunn br ok F Max Boesi er, presented the fi st s age d velopment
_
__
_ _
_
lJest ~
Th
f the Nyborg Propert
for Chic anne
, the
Glenn
~
field Manor Subdivisi
g
n. _
~___ _
incre
The ~ nts. This is the f'
ans are for D~ line st s age p esentation.
?st nkc
Ann_e_t e Hinrichs stated th t the Commi Sion is concerned ab ut t e nee for
__
Schoo
up in
land, Fire Station
the long~an.e lann'
uture
n
land
hese
d all the other pro
riteria are not set
lems
s e
that
und.e _
an come
a Comprehensive
Plan.
olic It is hard to be fa'
es later. r to 1 de elopers to grant pro osal now d set
Mr. S a
rp pointed out that the ennfi ld Alanor had s_et asi e a arcel for a
Grade
would _
School. Its size wi
appear that another 1 con
chool ume a
site proximately '70;v of t
ould then be needed e sc
ossi ools
1 wi apacity. It
hin the
_ same
This ection of land.
roposal is considere
for
in 1e
famil resident.
Mr. B esiger, the land own r, st
s_ ted t at what he is most i tere ted i
v-- o is getting
her land use.
Homes of $45,000 to $50,000 value.
nt-..i Ai sn Plan ni nv and 7.nniri¢
.2.
January 16, 1978
Vari ces from the Ordinan a of latti g were requested:
1. That 4' sidewalk be a prove rather than the S' idew ks r uired,
2. That Blocks 3, 5 and 7 be ap roved with maximum 1
r ~ ngth
d in e
k ess of
- 2 '
3, That Misty Place ulde ac be approved with a 450' leng h rat er than the
4. That the streets e au_ roved with 50' right-of-wa s wi h 5' asements on
each si e ra .er an i rigi -o -ways.
Lot front minimum of
36 residences to the 5 fe
acre. t
Mr. S arp pointed out that he fe t tha new developments sh uld omeho bear the
costs
suppr of the problems they
ssion etc.). How Great
this fin
s to cially and otherwise
e accomplished is th uti
pro i ies
lem, sc oo s, ire
Mr. B esi er stated that h' s lap exte ds throu h to Ustick Th' s Ann xation will
possi
land ly extend for five
et aside for school ye
rom h s.
's ro Ie would not object t
osal at some later d the
te. schoo purchasing
Mrs. inrichs had asked ho the malle rirouosals could sh e in solvi g School land
use ong with the larger evelo er,
Jirn in stated that he h d con ersed with the School Sup' wh riroj cted that in
the f
s uar tore time to come,
mile. No student s ound
ould Ieridi
ave t one Grade School w
walk more than 1 2 uld
ile be nee
o sch ed in each
ol.
There is one lop street w' t_h a uldes c iFiist Place that is 1 n er han
Ordin ces allow.
Mr. P kin is reluctant to a~ ro e the entire. lap he woul be illin to approve
this nitial stage o£ deve opmen .
P1ike rost agreed that he ould horte up this Culdesac,
The M tion was made by Jim in and s conded by Don Sharp that he Co imission
recom
Sunny en o e i y oun
rook Farm proposal f i
ist s ~t
age o apnrove~~pre imi
develoument request ary
of a a o
proxi e
ately
un
and p ss an~grant~ e vari
eviously recited in ances
hese as re
inute .ues e in eir e t
and on file with th r a
se m e
nutes nary ,
and that
-h•
_ ge e ma a in e o
Motion pass g u esac ringing i ack to e t,
Jim K _
Mr. 5
acres eve }}osak presented
This is to include he rt
two idian
f the Greens partial devel
ine olf fairwa s an pmen
re prop
ns• sal of 36.5
sin le
ami
some ots; zero lot 1
f which will be zero ne,
lot .proxi
ne. ately 75 x 105 feet 'n to size single family
Appro
hlr. ;} imately 3. acres ar
sak stated that basi plai
all ed as
'~ Town Houses.
_ This evelopment will be p aced n a m and central sewer sy tem.
A Cit
own water line to the w ter wer uld supply the potab a wa er su ply at the
~9eridian Pl annine and Zonin[? .3.
January 16, 1978
It wa thought by Mr. iiosak that this roject would need to have ity c ntral sewer
o it pr pe y eyo s -
ere
allow s o e s ree
The developer needs
to c
ange
his.
The m in thorofares are to e 60 ~ som are being proposed s 50~ with foot
easem n s n e si e.
Culde ac of Country 'ierrace
Golf
fairw nurse will not be mad
swill be rased in unt
at t 1 the
is ti 3rd Phase of constru
e. tion. e uture
The G if Course will be own d b the 1 t owners in this dev lopm t.
The o erall ro oral when c m le ed:
288 single family
58 'Caro lot lines
1 Total units
161 Acres total
5.07 miits per acre a to open pace
The M
recomm tion was made by Don
end t the Cit Counc harp
'1 th and s
t_th_e conded by Annette Hi
acce t the relimin rich
d that
veld the Commission
ant lam
First
Cit Phase, of the hieridia
ouncil of th lon C Gre
desa ns pr
rov posal~ subject to th
din. ad.eruate turnin app
rad' oval
us. f the
Motion assed: A12 ea
Dir. H sak stated that a fi sta ion c uld be oLaced in the vici it o the
_ Club k ouse if one is neede in t e fut ue.
hir. F ller spoke to the Co issi n to oint out that Commer ial d Zn ustrial
were
This eing su si ize o s
rocess should not be por
llow e o
d to er segments o e
each a point of date axe
ring socie
locat' y.
on in our
comet i y. - -
The_r_e being no other burin ss to come before the Commissio the meeti
stood adjourned.
CHAIRMAN
attar
_- -_ i y er -
cc: D:ayor & Cowicii;P&L Commis ion•H in•~' - - ; itzgerald;
Hamilton;Chief Green;AIC;APA;ACHD;Ada Zoning Director;Ada Commissioners;
Central kiealth;iJampa-I•'.eridian Zrri~;ation;Minutes;Industrial Study~Community Devel B5-13)
Sunnybrook Farms;Tderidian Greens.; Minutes.
p J ~ 2 L ~ .. '-~
C -~ P l ~
- ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ L e
? ,'J S ,~ w w T Y ti n `•
~ r .c = T T ~ a ~ nT F ~ ay
^..
_ _ ~^ ~.~-. ^'~~J .. m ~ dm r UJ
-. t C_ r.. ..~ '. i y~} n .y ..7 ~ eb
C ... r~ ~ ,`- > ~ a ~ ~. C C F C- N ~~ p z
s Y = ~ ~i =.'`y ~~r a~ r~ o m
_ ~ T ' C
mac^~s- 7Y 37 X .C"
o n m ?.£ ~I.°7 ~s~ ^+R c~ z 3° ~ n:
C
~,m ~
5 ~ ~ c ~. 8 ~ n
o n ~~ ~- ~~ ~ r ~-~ f i n ? 0. G Vj-
e °'~°~~~m yC ~'- nm~°S3. w~.
yy F ~ y ~ Li .. S ~ (ti.
Ap~~NrnT
' - ~ G a'-'~' m ~ ~:-~ O- ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~. ~ ~n
,d ~~ c ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~O.cx ~. =gym jAS,
w~.~SA Or Cl. '2_~C wy~ 9~0.
1
~ ~ _
6 ,. ~ F t~< r C~~ ~ LL C ~`N
a~ do.~n,,,w~c~_ c a°. ~Aw
'° a~~~~'v v°`~r7, =gyp:-°,~m'~o °x' ~ ~
~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ O d y ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~D m r+ pY
_ ~ am ~.°a~-<f obi rtc ~'~oif
m 2 v °-5 ~^.m N.w w ,n»,1.a v; o F c
c ^ omm ~c r ~ =io co
- ~~
:w2
~. "jN Sic r`-' 6nwoo'~ ~ ~ c~_
rt e~
S'y~C]4T~P~r° °y.-5r~ GP ~~
Ei ~' i F
ate.-`~~,30~9" .. cti m,o Yy ~D`
\'
~l
i
~
`. ry~C
1
.. ,'
'
t,..
•
`,
commentary •
I~olic~ changes could sloes do~u
our destructive rate of growth
by Walt Minnick
Slowing mnaway population growth
is THE environmental issue of the
future in Idaho. A strong statement?
Without question. But, perhaps, not
far off the mark.
After four decades of low growth
and, in some years, no growth, Idaho
in the 70s has been "discovered" by
footloose industry and an increasingly
mobile American population covetous
of clean air, friendly people, unspoiled
outdoor recreation and low crime urban
centers.
The state as a whale is now adding
people at a rate of 2.5 per cent per yeaz,
three times the national average, and
every year that rate of increase seems to
nudge upward. Six counties, Blaine,
Jerome, Madison, Kootenai, Boise and
Ada, are literally exploding at five to
seven times the national rate. The im-
plications are revolutionary.
Ada County, for example, at the pre-
sent rate of increase will become a
sprawling metropolis of close to half a
million people by the end of the cen-
tury, a date little more than two
decades distant. The entire state's
population could easily double in the
same 23 years.
The impact of this mass influx of
people, seeking the qualities of life
cherished and enjoyed by native
Idahoans for generations, will be totally
self-defeating for both the newcomers
and present-day residents.
How many coal-fired and nuclear
power plants would be requited to
satisfy the booming energy require-
ments of an affluent, industrial based
Idaho double the present population?
Even if the energy can be made
available from somewhere, its Cosa,
which must be borne disproportionate-
ly by the small user under the anti-
quated utility rate stmcture, will cause
severe hardship.
Eastern Idaho residents have already
been forced to accept a 100 per cent in-
crease in Utah Power and light's rates
during the past seven years as a direct
consequence of Utah's fast growth
policies. Continued fast growth in
Idnbn wnul~{ ^rcan a tr+rrtinuiuH Lar-
~,
_ ~. - ,. _
~ ~., -~
.~'..-"'
.I ~~: _ ..
~"'
Number of cars on Boise streets would more than double
by the end of the century with present population growth
rates. s
"The impact of this
mass influx of people,
seeking the qu¢lities of
life cherished and en-
joyed by n¢tive Idaho-
ans for generations, will
be totally self-defeating
for both the newcomers
and present-day
residents. "
rem of price doublings every seven
years of less.
How much wildlife and how many
quality streams and fisheries can we ex-
pect to retain when our already heavily
logged state is subjected to the combin-
ed onslaughts of a Forest Service res-
ponding to industry pressures for ever
more lumber and twice as many in-
creasingly affluent residents seeking
outdoor recreation? The "models" for
the kind of our-of-doors we may be-
queath to our children are already with
us: overflowing campgrounds in the
Trinities; Priest Lake with more ski
boats than trout and Redfish chuck-a-
blockwith RVs on aJuly 4 weekend.
We have just about used up the rec-
reational capacity of our forest and river
resources. Additional population can
only diminish the quality. Reservations
now have to be made a year in advance
ro IL+ar thr Middle Pork of rhr tialnuro,
dne of our relatively few remaining
wild rivets. Do we really want to inten-
sify people pressure to the point where
the wait is two, three or five years? The
Fish and Game Depatunent repotted
that 37 per cent fewer deer and 54 per
cunt fewer elk veto taken during the
1976 hunting season than in the
preceding year. Even with more restric-
tive limits, will there be any teal big
game hunting by the erid of the cen-
tury?
Poor air quality in the fTcqucnfly
stagnant p«kcrs in which most of
Idaho's major cities are located is
already, at existing population levels,
pushing us into the air pollution big
leagues. Boise, surrounded on three
sides by hills and mountains, recorded
a carbon monoxide Icvcl of 19.7 patts
per million last November 15. This
reading exceeded the 1960 era five-year
highs repotted by such major urban
centers as Cincinnati, St. Louis,
Oakland and San Francisco. It is
halfway to the extreme emer~cncy level
at which police permission a required
to drive and only hospitals, grocery
stores and drug stores ate allowed to re-
main open.
Carbon monoxide levels in down-
town Boise exceeded allowable Federal
Clean Air Act standards an astounding
84 days this past winter and average
readings are now close to two thirds of
those repotted in Los Angeles. With
over 300 days of inversion conditions in
a "normal" ycaz, what will it be like at
the turn of the century with two to
20
Three times as many fact ,homes
and autos spewing pollutan s into the
same s[agnant air?
As residents of cities such as Nampa,
Ketchum, Meridian and Pocatello are
finding [o thei[ chagrin, rapid growth
is as financially devastating as it is
destmctive of living quality. Property
taxes and user fees skyrocket as local
government s[ruggles to provide the
new stree[s, utili[ies, schools, fire-
houses and ocher services requited by a
rapidly growing urban population.
These costs raise the taxes of the present
residents who are forced to subsidize
[he relocation of newcomers and new
industry. It is no coincidence that areas
experiencing fast growth have rapidly
rising taxes. In Boise as growth began
ro accelerate between 1967 and 1972,
the city budget increased three times as
fast as [he population, afrer adjusting
for inflation. With the higher taxes
come, inevitably, increased crime, traf-
fic jams, deteriorating and impersonal
government services, more government
bureaucracy and loss of the sense of
communi[y which distinguishes Idaho
from more urbanized regions of the
East and Far West.
There is almost no facet of Idaho's
existing quality of life which will not be
seriously eroded or destroyed by the
[ype of Tunaway population increases
now beginning to take shape. Those in
the environmental movement who
have labored migh[ily for past victories,
such as Hells Canyon, the White
Clouds and Pioneer, face the prospect
of watching overuse and burgeoning
people pollution rapidly reverse those
gains and much more.
The root causes of Idaho's alarming
growth are new, large-scale agricultural
development and outside industry
which is increasingly choosing to locate
in our state because of its living quality,
comparatively low wage and tax s[tuo
ture, relatively cheap energy (based on
a hydro power system that is being
eroded by added high-lift pumping),
and a conservative pro-development
political climate. Every new job created
by such development results eventually
in five or six new people living and
earning a living in our state.
Slowing new job-creating agricul-
tural and industrial development is
thus [he key to preserving a state worth
passing on to our children.
What can be done and by whom?
First, we should stop spending hard-
rarncd state and local tax money pto-
uwuug lancet gww~L. Nr~rly bolt
million dollars is appropriated in the
"The regulatory and
legislative tools to insure
slower, unsubsidized and
more orderly growth are
available if we only have
the will to use them. "
state of Idaho's budget for promonng
new industry and tourism. It would
make much more sense to consign In-
credible Idaho and like govecnment-
sponsored promotional efforts to the
archives and get these same people and
dollars applied ro doing something less
socially deswctive. A similarly socially
responsible reversal of program by local
^ewspapers, chambers of commerce
and other businessmen's associations in
fast growth areas is just as vital.
It rnakes no sense to be giving away
publicly-owned desert land at zero or
nominal charge under the Desert Land
and Carey acts. These projects, if they
are fed by pumping from the Snake
Rivet, deplete our already over-appro-
priated Snake River water supply,
reducing summer peak load hydro
power generation while adding to peak
power requirements. Yet ex-Governor
Andrus' Interior Department continues
ro process a huge backlog of desert land
applications which, if granted in total,
threaten to dry up the Snake complete-
ly in low water years. The simple solu-
non is an immediate moratorium on all
plans to take more water out of the
Snake for agricultural or industrial
uses.
We should also be very slow to ap-
prove proposals to add new electrical
generating capacity in Idaho when the
justification is providing a large power
supply for future development. This ra-
tionale constitutes, to a large extent, a
self-fulfilling prophecy. If big new
power plans aze built, that in itself
provides a powerful incentive for more
industry to move iii-. The Northwest
aluminum industry was atxracted to
this bauxite barren region because of
power supply. If there is no surplus, or
if any surplus is problematic, the
message to new industry, and par-
ticularly heavy industry, is to look
elsewhere for the next plant site. Con-
servation of energy and the addition of
small increments to the supply with
low-head turbines or by upgrading ex-
isting hydro sires is a wiser energy
policy for Idaho than building big coal
..r nurlrur plunro.
We must overi,aul our utility race
stmcture. Tl~xisting system of
declining rates as use increases en-
courages waste, encourages industrial
use over residential use and encourages
rapid growth and developmen[. Every-
one is forced to subsidize growth by
providing bazgain rates to the new user
whose new corporate farm or factory
overloads the utility system, making
costly expansion necessary.
We need incremental rates, which
would require the new user to pay his
full share of the cost of additional
power plans and transmission lines.
New coal-fired generating capacity
costs over five limes as much to build
and operate per unit of electricity than
the average rate now charged by Idaho
Power Co. A large new industrial custo-
mer or new Snake River pump project
should thus quite logically be charged a
rare five times higher than existing
races or be required to deposit for use
by the utility their pro rata share of the
cost of building the next unit of
generating capacity. The alternative of
allowing all rates to go up in order to
give the new factory lower rates [ban
most present customers makes no sense
whatsoever and constitutes a direct sub-
sidy to promote growth.
The principle of forcing growth to
pay its own way should be incorporated
into out planning and inning and into
user fee structures. Why should the
oldtimer be forced co pay higher pro-
perty taxes to subsidize the cost of the
streets, sewers, fire houses, schools and
government buildings requrred by the
newcomer? It seems only logical [hat a
full pro-rata share of the capital costs of
government services should 6e assessed
to the developer as a condi[ion for go-
ing ahead with the project. Legislation
is needed at the slate and county levels,
along with a commitment by local elec-
ted officials to force growth to pay its
own way, pazticulazly in the highest
growth counties.
Most importantly, officeholders and
the public as a whole need to be made
aware of the consequences of existing
growth trends and of the fact that a
rapid transformation of Idaho into a
high population density, industrial
economy is not inevitable. It will hap-
pen only if we choose as a matter of
public policy to let it happen. The
regulatory and legislative tools to in-
sure, slower, unsubsidized, more order-
ly growth are available if we only have
the will to use thorn.
IY~alt Minnick it a Baire burinerrman
,rnz! rt nran~h2r rlj Giticanr err ~3ualit~
Lrvirtg.
The Idaho Ciriz<n /Number Three 2I
J(ls0
5903 Franklin Road
- ~~~~~ y
~.J-U-$ ENGINEER~INC`~ ~~
Bolas, Idaho 83705
TNsphons (208) 338.5850
Meridian City Planning 6 Zoning
Commission
City Hall
728 Meridian Street
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Dear Committee Members:
January 16. 1978
~e ~ 5~~,,7 brool~ ~,~.~ A~at~
We request that the following variances from your Subdivision Ordinance
be granted:
~.
1. That 4' sldewalka be approved rather than the 5'' sidewalks
required.
2. That Blocks 3, 5, and 7 ba approved with maximum lengths in
excess of the 1,000' limit. (Block 3-1,150', Block 5-1,175'
and Block 7-1,250'.)
' r
3. That Misty Place Culdesac be approved with a 450' length
rather than the 400' length required.
4. That the streets be approved oyith 50' right-of-ways with 5'
easements on each side rather than with 60' right-of-ways.
Your favorable consideration of these matters will be appreciated.
Sincerely yours,
• J-U-B ENG~I'NEERS, Inc
~/,i,/~'""/
hael L. Frost
MLF:dm .
J
~„N„
ENGINEERING-PLANNING-SURVEYING ~...
- __ _ _.._ _ ~ _...,..---,T-v^~.rm
L SO-Z -i
a a ~G m O
3 < n
~~ m s ~
~~' 'G m ~ N
~G O N C
C N O ~
N ~ o n m
~ a
O a •~+rr
> > ~ ~
N u7 O a
~ f O rr
V m r, N
~ ~ O E O
v~ •c
~ ~ Z
N J
N n
-.. o-o
O m
n m
0 3
~ 7 R
a VI N
~ ~.
na
f m ~
m z a
m
o_
c
O
I
W
B '
:7
7
t
w
~~
.0~3
x x x
I
-
1
~
Ix
I
I
xl
~
I
~) ~~/ /~ 7
2= 23 m -1 n N ~• •-• ~-• y ~ ~E ', cn In to cn ...-, .-r -r7 J ~ j n ? A A
~~ ~
o z ~.o c~.c. an a a n--. ~~ n n n z -s •/o no.
~~ _
a •; w rr o a :v ~~ w rr ,-~r _ Fs ~- T ~ ~ ~ z z -s 's O ~ a d
-
f,. -. v ... -- T C t' _ m 'D m O
m O O O -+• fD fD fU N ff
Vl -o -Y N ~ O u .: ~ ^1 Z ~ Z O O O tG iG u^ 'S O Vf A
1 1 1 a~
O O l/1
3
„~ -,o n ~,~ --aaa 1
S
o ~
a : o o x= v 3-- ~ 1 1 N a N ~ :
~
'
:
J~ r
5
h 1
s 33
~ ~a
C
* ~ o ~r ^
W /'~ .
.
.
.~
O
W 11 1 0.0 0 ~o O oO -i
(U
....~ C
T-
m - ~.~
a -
.
o
o o o ~ ~. ... ~. ~. ~.nK .
A
-'
O ff J ~
.•. rf rr . 3 7c. aA 3 r7 (D N N ~y O f
~p a j
n a ~'
J N 1/, fD C O I 1 1 m 3 fD N (D 7 S
.
A m
O
-~ N y -S ~
O m .
.
N J O~ A A C~
- v
~ ~ yr J
o~ ~
- E
a 'D O_ (D w O p -~ N~ c~
c -~ 3 -'• m
N -
- v
. o
- r.
w ro ~ v+ -+ cr `c
o
c ~n a
a m m - v
r m
O O 3 v (D S 0 0
w-•
O ~-. r
.~. p 3 'S m r) m Z 7 3 -+.
j
•~1 0 .-. m cv V+
n o
z f. j O H
+
o ~
~ p
c" ~
o
J ,
yA J
z
L1 :
ar
o
F ~
UJ
p ti n N
3 .-. 3 N a rf M ..
N A
z
..
.. ~•-• '~
V
0
c7
O A A_
d N .~ a -'
7 -1 ~
T -1 N
? ~l
I
I
n ~. m O
r~ can m~ = •~ ~ N m 3
~ A 1
r I
m fr
y ~
a'
0
0
p
Al
9
w
w
p
N
O
H
O
N~
H
h
0
A
x
O
•b
a
r H
ib
m
y
cF
!+.
r~
a
x
r
tf
.~
N.
N
ff
'4
N
O
rL
N
A
w
a
r
•F. H r~
~ ~ ~~'
N N
'! '.07 N
In N h
ti o' a
N m w
4 ~ p
W !]+ N
M IC
a
~•
4 ~
a iM ~p' r
0 0
~ ~
n ~ ~
tf
O N N
O
--, ~ o
f':'I J• -T
~ ~
`o m
m o 0
~ ~.
n
-~ N 7
H ~ Q
o •a
z of
N 7
•• O
M~
O N
Z
a
~ O'
(D O
< C
~• ~
m
f7
. ~
N
N
N
O
m
Z
m
11
c
m
h
A
ZI
oa' ~
m
(O
~ v
~ i
m
N
m
ft
m
a
;~
1~
~P
~ In ro ~
a c
a -~
v i ~
'G m
C ~
VI O r ~
? ~ ~
. p ~.
Q
o <
J o n
~ m
~ n .
~ ~ ~ a
?
O- d C
I _
~ I~ ~
fD ,
wl
A
Z
m
>~
O
J.
v.
N N
~. A
N N
fD ~
O
7
a
-t
O
a
O
a
N
a -r
7 -/
n~
~o
Z H
O ~
o' 3
~ ~
am
c -s
~o
v
m 0
y ~n
11~
ll .-
•h
n n
fD -i
v
d
Z
f1
s z
a m
N N
0
r~o m
n
.o.. rA
~ p
a' m
~ I
a -~
Z
d V
C V
N 1
fy'
~ 1
O
d O
'fl
0
N
M
z
3
a
1
A
1 ___:. ,