Loading...
1980 02-11• C~ A G E N D A Meridian Planning and Zoning February 11, 1980 ITEM: Minutes of January 14, 1980 meeting approved as read Minutes of January 28, 1980 special meetino approved as read. 1. Nunemiller-Anderson Annexation "A" Residential. 10 Acres north of James Ct. on Meridian St. APPROVED, contingent upon comp- liance of City water, sewer and all Departments. 2. Meridian Park #2 Final Plat - E. of Linder Rd., N. of Meadowview Sub. APPROVED as long as development plans are followed and have approval of all Departments. 3. Mrs. Leiding (Split lot) - TABLED. 4. Kelly Parker Rezone from "A" Residential to "C" Commercial. Bower's First Addition, NE corner of Meridian St. and Ada St. APPROVED with Ada St. entrance. 5. Gentry Rezone from "A" Residential to "C" Commercial - Meridian Plaza. Fairview across from Evans Professional Building. APPROVED, streets to be reviewed with design review. 6. Input on Multi Family. Meridian Plaza. 7. Meadowview #2 Final Plat - W. of 8th St. & E. of Meadowview #1. APPROVED. 8. Barney Property Development - Noteboom Annexation on Cherry Lane. Recommend to Council for Input. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission February 11, 1980 Chairman Don Sharp called the meeting to order at 8:05 P. M. Members present: Annette Hinrichs, Lee Mitchell, Kenneth Tewksbury Others present: Jim Potter, L. N. Cartwright, John Matzinger, Steve Anderson, Kirk Anderson, Eric Anderson, Kelly Parker, David C. Jensen, Lee R. Stucker, Ruth Raynor, Michael L. Milhollin, Barbara Geile, Martin H. Fabricius, Bruce Winchester, 4layne S. Forrey, Roy B. Johnson, J. L. Leiding, Mrs. J. L. Leiding, Everett 0. Parker, Ken M.ontee. Minutes of the previous meeting held January 14, 1980 vtere approved as read. Minutes of the special meeting held January 28, 1980 were approved as read. Agenda 1 Hunemiller-Anderson Annexation "A" Residential Hearing - located N. Meridian Rd., north of James Court. John Matzinger,CTM Engineering, was present, representing the annexation request of Steve Anderson and Dave Hunemiller. A map was displayed of the 10.8 acres, planned unit development, a combination of two properties. The general concept is of a townhouse of 700 to 1000 sq. ft., individual units and yet connected to look as a single dwelling, parcels 0 lot line with open space around, 80 units and approximately $50,000. There are 2 single family lots, 84 units in all, and 2 homes already on location. Matzinger stated that FHA is in full support of concept. Market has been for one or two bedroom and a price range that retired, older people or the young couples just getting started. There was discussion concerning streets. Matzinger stated that the density is not as hioh as across the street so they would gradually transition in a lower density use. For economic reasons, pointed out the walking distance from the commercial center, townhouses designed for less utility strain, provide a place for older people to be and young couples to start, it is good solid housing. Sharp questioned whether the City can afford this type of development until we have more industrial/commercial tax base. His understanding was that this type does not carry its own weight (generate enough tax revenue) as far as schools and City services. Matzinger stated that the water and sewer trunk lines are already there. (James Court.) Approximately $40,000.00 in tax revenue is generated. Grounds are taken care of for approximately $8.00 a month. The City will not have to maintain a park. The layout with the most advantage is with a private street. Hinrichs liked the layout, but was concerned about the traffic. The Motion was made by Hinrichs to recommend to the City Council, approval of Hunemiller-Anderson Annexation, contingent upon compliance of City water, sewer, and all Departments. Tewksbury stated that he had no .problem with annexation, but was not convinced about the future proposal. He felt access needed some work. Tewksbury seconded the Motion. Mitchell stated he also would approve the annexation, but not the proposed development. Motion Carried: All yea. There were no public comments regarding the Hunemiller-Anderson Annexation Hearing. . Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission .2. February 11, 1980 Agenda 2 Meridian Park #2 Final Plat - E. of Linder Rd., North of Meadowview Sub. Roy Johnson was present, representing and explained that Meridian Park #1 Final Plat was filed in 1979 and displayed a map with the layout of #1 and #2. Changes included angles have been straightened, intersection in Barclay Court conforms with Ada County Highway District, fire hydrants, streets are 50 foot, 5 foot easement on each side, dedication of 40 foot right-of-way. The Motion was made by Mitchell and seconded by Tewksbury that Meridian Park ,#2 Final Plat be approved as long as development plans are followed and have approval of City departments. Motion Carried: All yea. Agenda 3 Leiding - Lots 1, 2 and 3, E. 3rd and Ada St. Mr. Leiding presented a diagram and requested the approval to split Lot 2, making two good sized lots instead of three (3) 30X88 lots. The front of the house is on the remainder of their property. The Leidings wish to sell the house and 48 foot depth to their daughter. There was discussion concerning setback requirement. If lot is split, a variance would be needed for the present house for back property line. The Motion was made by Hinrichs that the Commission recommend to City Council that Mr. & Mrs. Leiding be allowed to split Lot 2, Block 3 of Bown Addition, the lot with the house to be 48X88, the other lot (3) to be 42X88, with a six foot set back on west side of house. Motion died for lack of second. The Motion was made by Mitchell and seconded by Tewksbury that the Leiding request for split lot #2, Block 3 of Bown Addition be tabled until March 10, 1980. P1otion CarriedL Mitchell, yea, Tewksbury, yea, Hinrichs, nom. Agenda 4 Kelly Parker Rezone from "A" to "C" Commercial - located Meridian and Ada St., Bowers First Addition, Lts.l6 & 17, Block 2 Parker introduced David Jensen who read the request for commercial and put up a new steel or block building approximately 30X50. (Letter on file with these minutes) There was discussion concerning lot size. The lots are approximately 105 deep. All owners within 300 feet had been notified by certified mail. Chairman Sharp asked for public comment. There was none. Parking area was discussed: Access to be from Ada St. and parking paved. The Motion was made by Tewksbury and seconded by Hinrichs that the Commission recommend to City Council approval of Parker Rezone of Lots 16 and 17, Block 2, Bowers First Addition from "A" Residential to "C" Commercial, with Ada St. entrance. Motion Carried: All yea. Agenda 5 Gentry Annexation Rezone - P1eridian Plaza - E. Fairview. James Gipson, architech, presented the project and described the request to additional commercial zoning from "A" to tie into existing commercial. This is not final design, they will modify this based on input and comply with greenbelt idea by leaving Five Mile Creek open (originally shown as tiled) BOR and Nampa-Meridian Irrigation go along with either the or open. Gipson stated that an interesting development had occured by way of adjoining property owner who wishes to develop also. This owner has a 60 foot right-pf-way up and adjacent to Gentry property extending to Fairview providing an excellent access to all properties. Peridian Plannino and Zoni on .3. February 11. 1980 Also, they will put in Gruber St. to the south of their property. The creek runs along the side of the proposed road, a foot bridge in center proposal, two (2) accesses, deceleration lane. Jim Potter is in the process of developing a neighborhood concept plan which includes this area. Sharp stated the agreement to put the street down the west side, to put in their portion of Gruber St. and that it appears to be a quality development. Hinrichs expressed desire to keep Five Mile Creek open and bicycle paths. Chairman Sharp called for comments from the public for rezone hearing. There were none. The Motion was made by Mitchell and seconded by Tewksbury to recommend approval to the City Council of Gentry Rezone Triangular parcel from "A" Residential to "C" Commercial, the same as the front parcel, streets to be reviewed with design review. Motion Carried: All yea. Agenda 6 Meridian Plaza-Gentry Annexation James Gipson stated that they desire input regarding a proposal of 36 units on 3 acres (12 units per acre) which complies with proposed density. Townhouse units, sold individually, in one development, project as a whole (Meridian Plaza) would be a good tax base, provide necessary streets, and utilities. Gipson felt the market would not support all of this property as commercial as they know it would with this kind of development. Five Mile Creek provides a natural transition. Sharp felt that putting in 5th St. and Gruber St. would be a fair trade-off for multi-family (12 unit per acre). Hinrichs agreed with Sharp and stated also, the improvement of Five Mile Creek. Mitchell felt the access plan was acceptable. There was discussion concerning the maintenance. Gipson stated he is involved as a designer in Lakewood Subdivision, PUD and Maple Hill, there are tight requirements, but they are doing well. Gipson stated they would come back with a formal request. Agenda 7 Meadowview #2 - final Plat Mike Milhollin and Ken Montee, developer displayed both the Preliminary Plat and the Final Plat. The Preliminary Plat had been marked for approval by Council May 29, 1979. The numbering of the 'lots and blocks has been changed since Preliminary approval by request of the County engineer so that they be consecutive with Meadowview #1. Montee stated that he had met with Dick Williams and Lot 1, Block 1 will be dedicated 50' right-of-way to the Gity fora road. This would have to be submitted before Council in writing. Montee stated that when he was before Council, the Fire Department had a comment in writing that they found nothing wrong with the Plat. Milhollin stated that modification had been made on the cul-de-sac to meet minimum lot frontages for federal funding. Also a parcel missing along the northern boundary which was acquired through condemnation procedure in 1918. Mr. Montee and Mr. Allen paid for, but never did get this as it belongs to BOR. Approximately one and a half acres adjacent to Five Mile Creek. The BOR has roughly 140 feet right-of-way along Five Mile Creek. Milhollin stated that they had experienced difficulty finding the existing water line, there was not an easement to it. The City requested that they include the design for connecting sewer system which is currently operated by a lift station. The Motion was made by Hinrichs and seconded by Tewksbury to recommend to the City Council approval of Meadowview #2 Final Plat. ~YUM~o~tion Cd 1'Pied: All yea. ~~.~~y ~, .,y¢~Fy :9'vitY x'64-TY~.~atY'$L. ~... i+1!~l,v Meridian Planning and Zonin Commission 4 February 11 1980 Agenda 8 Barney Property Development - Noteboom Rnnexation located on Cherry Lane adjacent to Meadowview #2 and Catholic Rectory. Wayne Forrey was present, representing developer Kent Barney. Concept was presented for guidance before coming in for Preliminary Plat. They cannot put a road down the middle of this property so ld. 11th is extended with extra deep lots. The Patio Home units in mind are three different configurations, Units one, two and three are all the same widths, the variation is turning the units, alternate down the street for attractivness. The lots are 80 feet wide. Units are approximately 1250 sq. ft., vary between two and three bedroom units, two level up and down and single car garages. Depth of lots are 120 feet. A wooden fence would be built at the back, individual lots would be fenced also. These will be sold, fee simple, setback on each side would be 7 1/2 feet. Back yards would vary 70 to 60 feet. They felt the concept would he desirable to the neighborhood. There is no Home Owners Association and $42,000.00 is a starting price. Forrey stated that the Ilighway Department stated they would need to negotiate as to putting the sidewals in the other side. Parking was discussed. Single story units being alternated was discussed. There is a temporary cul-de-sac planned at the end of the street. The Commission generally agreed with the concept of Barney proposal as the probable best use of this property, and they would need to go on to Council for concept input. The Motion was made by Mitchell and seconded by Tewksbury that the meeting adjourn at 10:30 P.M. ~ [;nairman C' y Clerk .:a ave'. Jalci an.l :iervice I'hon<a: Office 880-3379 Fi Pelina Milk cr= & 1,1 ilk Tanl:• Roc 888-2)27 `Ua~~ec~ ~arc~ Supp~i~ S.EE SUS BEROE,H YOq.BUY 908 East First MERA?L1N.:IDAHO.. F;;=r ?5 ;-zs~ a~~^ra_ ing ,_ retail dairy equipm=nt store at 9C3 F, 1.^-,t. ~n ~T~r'~ar ire feel the costs of renting a building are becoming pro- ',; r.; ± ~ ~-F ?+ '~ ~-; i nm ^rn,~nrty and building another building we can n~^rCn ~1 P, ';?lp`, !? no^tS and T1rnVif~e Our customers ~rrlth b2tt"r 3eTVi.C e. "h° pro^~rt° l~c~t?d a.t `.he corner of Meridian St. and Ada tt. ~rJOUld `^ i9^al for i~;is »aranP. C!zr ^la.n is +,n remove the existing struc- +..:re ~a ~_': r;lr,r?own and an esTesore to the neiPhborho ~d. 'r9e would ~~'~ n•~ a n~ `^?~ or binch building the dimensions being apnrox- ~_~at~ir '"-' v ~~!~ For ±he retail store and warehouse combined, `?'$e `.resole area v~ould he .filled and the area along Meri_dfan street ~.~rould be gravelled --nd eventually paved :for parking. Chzr b~~siness, since it is retail. sales, rides not generate noise en ~io -r-s~e ~~r trash would be allowed ~o collect, The number o£ r_ustn,:ers ncr day is small so traffic and. parking does not cre- ate :~ »roblem, 1"hank-you Palley Dairy Supply ~`