The URL can be used to link to this page

2007 05-17 fi t ~ u~~oHO Jgr >,FC`,~ ~~aY n /~ j'iif:.AtiU'fib.~/ `~„~ 9 i93i13 MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING REGULAR MEETING AGENDA City Council Chambers 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho Thursday, May 17, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. ~~ "Although the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony, all presentations before the Mayor and City Council are expected ?~- to be truthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter." 1. Roll-call Attendance: X Tom O'Brien _X Wendy Newton-Huckabay X David Moe _X Steve Siddoway X Michael Rohm -chairman 2. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve as Amended 3. Consent Agenda: ~: _; ~ A. Approve Minutes of February 8, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission Special Meeting: Approve B. Approve Minutes of April 19, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting: Approve C. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP 07-006 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for the operation of an animal care facility in an L-O zone for Liddell Veterinary Clinic by Falash & Ross Construction - 2300 W. Everest Lane: Approve 4. Continued Public Hearing from May 3, 2007: PFP 07-001 Request for a Preliminary /Final Plat approval to subdivide Lot 13, Block 3 of Vallin Courts Subdivision to create two (2) new lots for Benewah by Walker Homes, Inc. - 2673 North Ridgebury Avenue: Recommend Approval to City Council Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - May 17, 2007 Page 1 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meridian. e1f`~ Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. •t3 ~i ~' k 1 J ~~ t 3 l~ ~~f ~'~ ~t ~~ h!'~ f~ -- ~ ~ 1 t Vhr y t _ Y 3 ~ ' ~ ~~ Ji~~ Se ~~ ~~ ~ti ~ ~. ~~ ~fWy ,~ I' F 1 ~ .. ~ ~.~!p k ~ ~ i~i ~ ~' eq 1 I ~ i ~; , ~~.~ i ~* ~1. )) )~~ ~ :~ ~1 rt/r~FytS v'L~~~ M!I S $ .. .~C [y S i~~ir ~yF C 4I, ¢' ' '~ R gar ~% ! " " , ~ . ' , _ ,~ > \" ;~,~ ~ e w ` ~ :~ 'u " ~ ' ~ 4 '~j J2 i 11 ~~ Y ~ ~'~i ~ ~ _ u? z 1 " '3 t xt +3~ I k v s ~ r `~ h~ f ~ r ~.~ 5.~~ ~~ ~ I k ti ~ r. r.4 ~f ~ Ifla~ ~ y ~ `f` ~ ~., . .~ ~~L r1 ~ ~. .~ ~a ~f "' 4 .~ of '~ x ~ - - yy'~ ~ ~}. 4 St ~ F ~ ~ ;~ ~ y ~ I ~~ y ~I i~ ~ ~ ~ 4 i~'~ .. I ' E .~z~~ti t~ ~~. ~I - r ~~ ~ ~f ti a ~' ~~ ~~~1 ~ '~ r ~ r' ~ , sw.t~ kfa. ~I~i~ ~. y~~'~ S ~ ~ ~ s~' ~~~ - ,-~ 7 ' - , ~+~ ~. ` ~ C SPY, ~e ~~ 6f ~n 4~ ~1~ ~ m r ~ R nF. u; ~ - ` ~ - ~''~ C r~, ~ ~ t _. J ~ ; ~' ~ ~ m i ~ ~ ~ I ~, _ ~ ,. ;. ~~K ~j li p= _ r 4 k~ f- ~~ ~h' ~ ~ . . ~ .~ -, -. ., • 5. Continued Public Hearing from May 3, 2007: PP 07-009 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 52 residential lots, 2 office/commercial lots and 10 common lots on 19.80 acres in an L-O zone for Meadowlake Village North by Touchmark of the Treasure Valley, LLC -SEC of Franklin Road and Touchmark Way: Recommend Approval to City Council 6. Continued Public Hearing from May 3, 2007: CUP 07-008 Request for a Conditional Use Permit approval to create 52 residential lots, 2 ' "` office/commercial lots and 10 common lots in an L-O zone for Meadowlake Village North by Touchmark of the Treasure Valley, LLC - SEC of Franklin Road and Touchmark Way: Recommend Approval to City Council . 7. Public Hearing: RZ 07-009 Request for a Rezone of 24.69 acres from I-L to C-G zone for Jabil Southeast by Joint School District No. 2 -1303 East Central Drive (Portion of Lot 1, Block 1, of the Jabil Subdivision): Continue Public Hearing to June 7, 2007 8. Public Hearing: PFP 07-002 Request for a Combined Preliminary/Final Plat to subdivide Lot 4, Block 1, Devon Park Subdivision No. 2, to create two (2) new lots for Devon Park North by Doug Tamura - 1960 North Lakes Place: Recommend Approval to City Council 9. Public Hearing: RZ 07-007 Request for a Rezone of 0.19 of an acre from an I-L to an O-T zone for the property located at 305 W. Broadway Avenue for Vanbragt Property by Maria Vanbragt - 305 W. Broadway ,-. Avenue: Recommend Approval to City Council 10. Public Hearing: AZ 07-006 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 94.69 '~ acres from RUT to a C-G zone for Pinebridge by Stanley Consultants - south of E. Fairview Avenue, east of N. Locust Grove Road and west of N. Eagle Road: Continue Public Hearing to June 21, 2007 11. Public Hearing: RZ 07-010 Request for a Rezone of 75.67 acres from I-L and L-O zones to a C-G zone for Pinebridge by Stanley Consultants - south of E. Fairview Avenue, east of N. Locust Grove Road and west of N: ;Y` Eagle Road: Continue Public Hearing to June 21, 2007 12. Public Hearing: PP 07-008 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 61 building lots and 21 common lots on 170 +/- acres in a proposed C-G zone for Pinebridge by Stanley Consultants -south of E. Fairview Avenue, Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - May 17, 2007 Page 2 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, '+' please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. ~z A ;f ~, ; ~ , 4 ~} ~ S N ~. i h ~~ .. ~ ~,r R s' i 4 1 thb v ky ~ ~~ 3 9 s ~~ ~fiq ?a e'; y ~, ~ ~ 1iS'~Y if~~ rii 4 ~ y3 .. ~ ~t,,~ ~ I~ ~ ~~ ~' ~ ~L`.', ~ h C 1. Q f ~ ,~ ~ E ~ ~~~ ~ ,. t ,,-.' ',;,rr. r .n~, i'~ ' i i ~ ~~~~ r~: Kr it by ~ y ~ p ~~? i'i~~ t ~ .~ , ~} ,.fj a ~ ~;~ r*"fi '~~ ~ 'k' F ~. b-~'. w `+ ~i ' • • ~ ~~~ ~ 4 z:.~ L' iii ~~.,tiv `'~fn~... ~' : {{ +'. Z I ~ti r east of N. Locust Grove Road and west of N. Eagle Road: Continue , "` Public Hearing to June 21, 2007 r;~~ _, £° ~~ ~~~`~ ;, {r g' q 13. Public Hearin AZ 07-008 Re uest for Annexation and zoning of 3.32 ~ ~ =F ?w ~, ,~ e ~ ~ ~ acres from R1 to C-G zone for Zamzow's Overland by JR LLC - 3620 ' ,.~ , ~'~~' "`~` ~.. ;. and 3650 East Overland Road: Recommend Approval to City Council ". , g.- `~ 14. Public Hearing: CUP 07-011 Request for Conditional Use Permit for 12 = .~ multi-family residential units on one acre in an R-15 zone for Strate ,. ~, e Apartments by Gene .Strate - 911 East Pine: Continue Public Hearing -; _ ~~ ~ ~~ to June 7, 2007 ~;;~ ,,-a ~ •~ ~. , 5. Public Hearing: ZOA 07-001 Request for a Zoning Ordinance /Unified _ ~ .t ~ ~ ~a ~s~~~~_ ~~ ~_ ~ 5 , ~~. Development Code (UDC) Text Amendment to modify, clean up and add _-... $ ~` specific sections to the UDC (see application for details of all sections j~ proposed for amendments) for Unified Development Code Text ~:`` Amendment # 2 by the City of Meridian Planning Department: t.. ~ ` ~, ~~ ~~ Recommend Approval to City Council ~~ ,y '~ ~ ~ ~:.:: ~~ 5. " -~ ;: :~-: Y- '-':~ '~ s ~ ~~ ~~ R. ~ ~:~- s - `S'~''r~. ~ {~' ~ R• ~ ~ ~,~ r 2~ i: ; ~'; ,::, r.t- $ ~ ~~ ~ J~ ~~. } . Spy ; f 5 x ~ ~ ?~ ~1. Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - May 17, 2007 Page 3 of 3 __ ,~. All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, _: please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. id ~ * ly ~~`.~..:'._ 1.F ._l.l~'1, ~ s o Y ~ ~Yl' # r rk~~ ~' ~ ;%r~~ ~ `. ~tY: ~~` ~~ ,a., ~_, ~ ~' ~~ . . :~ ~~ :~ ~~ , ,~~~~,~'' °~~' °F ~~_' ~ ~ MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING ~_~~1VleY1G~l~y1 ~;~ REGULAR MEETING »,v~o ~; AGENDA y FC~R 4Tr~.nsu~.V^t1E'~ 190 City Council Chambers 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho Thursday, May 17, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. "Although the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony, all presentations before the Mayor and City Council are expected to be truthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter." 1. Roll-call Attendance: Tom O'Brien ~ Wendy Newton-Huckabay David Moe Steve Siddoway Michael Rohm -chairman 2. Adoption of the Agenda: .q-~p~®~ ~ 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approve Minutes of February 8, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission Special Meeting: ~~,® ~ B. Approve Minutes of April 19, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting: ~ ~~ /,.~, ~ C. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP 07-006 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for the operation of an animal care facility in an L-O zone for Liddell Veterinary Clinic by Falash & Ross Construction - 2300 W. Everest Lane.~~~~®~ 4. Continued Public Hearing from May 3, 2007: PFP 07-001 Request for a Preliminary /Final Plat approval to subdivide Lot 13, Block 3 of Vallin Courts Subdivision to create two (2) new lots for Benewah by Walker Homes, Inc. - 2673 North Ridgebury Avenue: Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - May 17, 2007 Page 1 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. i ~~;'j i ~~~ ;!~~ r'; ~~? i. ti iC?.. I ~~; r~r , k ~. s .... ~ ~~ I ..„ ~: ~' 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Continued Public Hearing from May 3, 2007: PP 07-009 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 52 residential lots, 2 office/commercial lots and 10 common lots on 19.80 acres in an L-O zone for Meadowlake Village North by Touchmark of the Treasure Valley, LLC -SEC of Franklin Road and Touchmark Way: Continued Public Hearing from May 3, 2007: CUP 07-008 Request for a Conditional Use Permit approval to create 52 residential lots, 2 office/commercial lots and 10 common lots in an L-O zone for Meadowlake Village North by Touchmark of the Treasure Valley, LLC - SEC of Franklin Road and Touchmark Way: Public Hearing: RZ 07-009 Request for a Rezone of 24.69 acres from I-L to C-G zone for Jabil Southeast by Joint School District No. 2 -1303 Ea Central Drive (Portion of Lot 1, Block 1, of the Jabil Subdivision): ~lQ~2e~. ~~ rim ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ Pulb~lic Hearing: PFP 07-002 Request for a Combined Preliminary/Final Plat to subdivide Lot 4, Block 1, Devon Park Subdivision No. 2, to create two (2) new lots for ®evon Park North by Doug Tamura - 1960 North Lakes Place: ,~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ C~~LQ Public Hearing: RZ 07-007 Request for a Rezone of 0.19 of an acre from an I-L to an O-T zone for the property located at 305 W. Broadway Avenue for Vanbragt Property by Maria Vanbragt - 305 W. Broadway Avenue: ~~ ~ o~~n®~ ~~~~~ °~ ~' ~ ~~'~ Public Hearing: AZ 07-006 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 94.69 acres from RUT to a C-G zone for Pinebridge by Stanley Consultants - south of E. Fairview Avenue, east of N. Locust Grove Road and west of N. Public Hearing: RZ 07-010 Request for a Rezone of 75.67 acres from I-L and L-O zones to a C-G zone for Pinebridge by Stanley Consultants - south of E. Fairview Avenue, east of N. Locust Grove Road and west of N. Ea le Road: (.:ll~~ of ~ ~~ ~-- ~1~~ ~ ~JI,t.Jr~ ~ .~®0 7 Public Hearing: PP 07-008 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 61 building lots and 21 common lots on 170 +/- acres in a proposed C-G zone for Pinebridge by Stanley Consultants -south of E. Fairview Avenue, east of N. Locust Grove Road and west of N. Eagle Road: ~~~in L~ ~~~~~c ~s ~ ~ ~~, ~ / ~~~ ~ Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - May 17, 2007 Page 2 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. .R ji L.;, i ~~ pin ,JI ~! pp ? t „u ~ ,b bra , j ~;y • Z~~j t ~:' ~TY"G4i~ Y~- P.y R .1 A ~4A ~,~~i. r ~ ~ ~ :_ d ~ ~ ~ J € ~ ' M~~ i• ~I,. t f t~ ~i ~~ ~. ~ + ~4~ ~ ~ ~r r ~~i ~ ~ A~ ~.~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ . ~.~p~ ~ ri i. . S~'y'lF x~.~~~ ,~... ~A~ At~AF. T ~ r ~ y. ._ { - . ~tt~~~~ ~ . ~x _.~~c9rT Ay t k ~ k 1~I>`I ~ ~ yY' ~rl i ~ ` 1... ~ } ~' ~ i ' ~: 1i I7 I a ~,rr~~Y ~ Y ~~i t'~ ~~~ {r A'~ ~` itG~7~r1.3' 3 . r }t ~yI i~ ~ ''~ ~<. ~ T' ~ t yy Y {~ ~'}t'FLq~'~ y 1 i. ^ ~S ~ ~~ ~i:. „~ 1 r 1, { ~,. { >~ t 4 ,~ r?r y ~;~ ~ r ~ ; r A s "' ~ p 4 ~ . n k 1 a{ i ~ 4.h~"`~k C ~ ~~E ~~' ~ ~ - [~.~} ~`,Tf,A }24 4. ' 11 S~ ~ ~`. 4~"i J it" ~ } ~ ~ x 13. Public Hearing: AZ 07-008 Request for Annexation and zoning of 3.32 acres from R1 to C-G zone for Zamzow's Overland by JR LLC - 3620 and 3650 East Overland Road: 14. Public Hearing: CUP 07-011 Request for Conditional Use Permit for 12 multi-family residential units on one acre in an R-15 zone for Strate Apartments by Gene Strate - 911 East Pine: 15. Public Hearing: ZOA 07-001 Request for a Zoning Ordinance /Unified Development Code (UDC) Text Amendment to modify, clean up and add specific sections to the UDC (see application for details of all sections proposed for amendments) for Unified Development Code Text Amendment # 2 by the City of Meridian Planning Department: ~~ ~~m~ ~~V~ ~ ~~ c~~~'~ ~r; s. >'. 11 ~, g, .~e., ~'3' ~i. d ~: i w. `1 ~''~ ~'~' Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - May 17, 2007 Page 3 of 3 _' Y All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. "` Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, . , , please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. .tip'. , ~; S~ ~S+~or~~.~ C ~; ~ 4;• ~S,F 4 ~'~ °F ~~ ~ MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING C~.~~V~.(°YI~I~,YI ~~ REGULAR MEETING IDAHO ~ AGENDA cE,~R ~.rvw~" ~ City Council Chambers y~ 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, Idaho - Thursday, May 17, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. "Although the City of Meridian no longer requires sworn testimony, all presentations before the Mayor and City Council are expected to be truthful and honest to best of the ability of the presenter." ~..~;. , . 1. Roll-call Attendance: ~z ,.,:. s~,;~}; ~. ~,..~ :~ ~>~`~ i W~~..; I 2. 3. Tom O'Brien Wendy Newton-Huckabay David Moe Steve Siddoway Michael Rohm -chairman Adoption of the Agenda: Consent Agenda: A. Approve Minutes of February 8, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission Special Meeting: B. Approve Minutes of April 19, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting: C. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP 07-006 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for the operation of an animal care facility in an L-O zone for Liddell Veterinary Clinic by Falash & Ross Construction - 2300 W. Everest Lane: 4. Continued Public Hearing from May 3, 2007: PFP 07-001 Request for a Preliminary /Final Plat approval to subdivide Lot 13, Block 3 of Vallin Courts Subdivision to create two (2) new lots for Benewah by Walker Homes, Inc. - 2673 North Ridgebury Avenue: Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - May 17, 2007 Page 1 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. - Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's ®ffice at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. ~ ~~'`'" j 4 ` F ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t~~ ~,:~~ l4' J Y, Y.. ~ yip! ~ '' , ' ' ~y. lrti`.~ Y ,~ ~}.' + `r .r' ~ 3 1 ~ ~~ p ,' !~ ~ = ~ - ~; J ~ . 4 f+ ~ ' i .~ . R ~ r ~ .: 3 4 ~4tryF/ ~~ ~ i . ~t on~_: i . ~ ~ l~ ~ I ; ~ ' 5 ~~ « ~ ~ T ~I~~.O~ ~fnX ~'_ ~ ~ / PI t' ~~_~ o~ i Sj j~~ _1% - r ~~~`iy~' ;; ~~` n ~ ~ 1 S~5 ~ ~i~~ ~' Ss'. .: ~~ ~ ~' ` Pg,I ~ ~ ~ ~, p 2 ~ +'4 ia ti ~ ;-;t4 i 1 'l'fi ~ ~ . Y '~ ~ K~~ ~::y. tl ~ Qt ru~by- ~^~fiia~.A` N ~ ~ ahf ~u. ~~ ~"~ n,t - r _ ^'''#aru ~, e' ~~_~a , ~i~ +r ~~ t'' i.; ; fi d'Y`f1~ M S ~ .~ EI t' ~~.T ~~.~~ ~ .: i 4 1 ~r i F~ ~d Y~ ~ ki$ 1 1 1 _ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~4 ~ ~: '~ ' a? ' !F? ~rvT~'K''~ t t ~ .l3 ~ ~ .y ~1 ~. . J k „pj '. ~ ~" ~1 tJ ~. a g3 7 i Ft ~p~i,~,~e ~ a: ~ J~h i ~ ,. i • 5. Continued Public Hearing from May 3, 2007: Preliminary Plat approval of 52 residential lots, and 10 common lots on 19.80 acres in an L- Village North by Touchmark of the Treasure N;~~ Franklin Road and Touchmark Way: PP 07-009 Request for 2 office/commercial lots Ozone for Meadowlake Valley, LLC -SEC of '~~- 6. Continued Public Hearing from May 3, 2007: CUP 07-008 Request for a Conditional Use Permit approval to create 52 residential lots, 2 office/commercial lots and 10 common lots in an L-O zone for Meadowlake Village North by Touchmark of the Treasure Valley, LLC - SEC of Franklin Road and Touchmark Way: ~'" 7. Public Hearing: RZ 07-009 Request for a Rezone of 24.69 acres from I-L ~' to C-G zone for Jabil Southeast by Joint School District No. 2 -1303 '=~~ East Central Drive (Portion of Lot 1, Block 1, of the Jabil Subdivision): 1, _ 8. Public Hearing: PFP 07-002 Request for a Combined Preliminary/Final Plat to subdivide Lot 4, Block 1, Devon Park Subdivision No. 2, to create two (2) new lots for Devon Park North by Doug Tamura - 1960 North .. Lakes Place: 9. Public Hearing: RZ 07-007 Request for a Rezone of 0.19 of an acre from ~ an I-L to an O-T zone for the property located at 305 W. Broadway ti~ Avenue for Vanbragt Property by Maria Vanbragt - 305 W. Broadway Avenue: =~ 10. Public Hearing: AZ 07-006 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 94.69 ~~~ ` acres from RUT to a C-G zone for Pinebridge by Stanley Consultants - 3, :~ south of E. Fairview Avenue, east of N. Locust Grove Road and west of N. a ~..- ; Eagle Road: 11. Public Hearing: RZ 07-010 Request for a Rezone of 75.67 acres from I-L I and L-O zones to a C-G zone for Pinebridge by Stanley Consultants - a Y, south of E. Fairview Avenue, east of N. Locust Grove Road and west of N. ~~` ~~ Eagle Road: ~ ~:~~. r 12. Public Hearing: PP 07-008 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 61 ~ building lots and 21 common lots on 170 +/- acres in a proposed C-G zone for Pinebridge by Stanley Consultants -south of E. Fairview Avenue, east of N. Locust Grove Road and west of N. Eagle Road: Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - May 17, 2007 Page 2 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. rl R ~~ a tt.i ~ ~ JS~ i:~~ t Tl~ ~~ ~ A- }~ ~~~5~' ~ ~ r a~ !mil Y '~:~ t ~~~~ G t y i' r ~~ ? Y H ~ ~ `'~ ,. ~ a - _i r1q?ff ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~.r ~ i~b tS IY k S~, ~ M~ ~ 3. - b 4 t` u S7 h1 !$pY`j! l n yyA F._ ~ - 't'. {`~.'f~3''Gj` sf'1 4~k 4 ~c I ~:'. ~eYeF E 's.~M W~y, 7. ~ ~'~ 1. ~ 2 4rt ~ ~ _ ~ N j ~~' la .` i ~ 1, ~ ^ r 5 ++. p1 '.4f';(t 15.. ~ F t ~YI F' r ~~JJ.y~ `~ ~~J U~ gggVVVV ~ ~, t ~., f "~- ~ 5 ti g L `~~ ~ t. fi' ~ ~ ~ !t ~'y ~s ~?~~~` ~ a Y " 4~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ "~?~` 13. Public Hearing: AZ 07-008 Request for Annexation and zoning of 3.32 acres from R1 to C-G zone for Zamzow's Overland by JR LLC - 3620 and 3650 East Overland Road: 14. Public Hearing: CUP 07-011 Request for Conditional Use Permit for 12 multi-family residential units on one acre in an R-15 zone for Strate Apartments by Gene Strate - 911 East Pine: 15. Public Hearing: ZOA 07-001 Request for a Zoning Ordinance /Unified Development Code (UDC) Text Amendment to modify, clean up and add specific sections to the UDC (see application for details of all sections proposed for amendments) for Unified Development Code Text Amendment # 2 by the City of Meridian Planning Department: ':. ~.. `~,~ -`~ ~.°- ~: ~- `; Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda - May 17, 2007 Page 3 of 3 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. 3 ~i+ 1. ^h yt { A t -,,". 5~ . ~~t~tR v.: ~~ ~~i k. ~ L ~: 1 m --' µ g ~ l ' ~, t, ~ t . ~ ~~ ? ~ 5 ~~ 1 ~Qa~ i~. _ F s+ .. ~ a ~ k s3~ f~',~'y~4 ~. ~ ~ Arr x.H ~ryry'{{r ,~ y i ~~' AS kr.i A ~. i t ~' 4 ~ ~~ ~rL`Y F: 1' jj ~~ . J 3: ~ ~ J ] ~ Y - •:.y ~ ~ . ~ ~ t i7 ~ ~ ~}~~ t ! ~ ~ ~~~f ~r~~ ~ ~ ~~ d ~ i ~ ~` -. 1, Y~ ~~`~•~C ~~~ ~ ~ - T~fi ~~~~ry a _a G l . ~ ~ ; ~ r. _ r ~ ` c s ~{ ~ t z R, y "JI ~i S ~ '_S k - ~, ~t d c`k M~ 7. ~'7~ ~~ ,{{•L MY;if4 ayV1~ ~ ~ 'jl~~ ~' ~ f 44 .vk. v r ~~~~ ~~'~'~~h .~r~ ~ 7W ~~ ,; a?y m~.~. c p~ 4 ~ t Sir ^t...,°,y/ ~~} *J ~~ ~ ~' T 1 4 iw ~., ' f '-S_zi ' ~~ • ~ ~ : la ' f ~~~ . ~: i ~~ i ~ ~. i "A ~_ „d ~, ~~: i~' t. !S ~~ Y i.. i ~ Broadcast Report Date/Time 05-14-2007 12:44:43 p.m. Transmit Header Text Cltyof Meridian Idaho Local ID 1 2088884218 Local Name 1 Line 9 Local ID 2 Local Name 2 Llne 2 This document :Failed (reduced sample and details below} Document size :8.5"x11" '~,~,~ "TM °P MERIDIAN PLANNING AND ZONING C/Y~fit~XLdl~ ~~ REGULARMEE'nNG wn»o AGENDA ~ ~ City Cou9~li Chambers 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridian, ldala Tharsday, May 17, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. "AHhough the City of Merldrlan no tortger requires sworn testlmorry, ati pyesenfations before the tt~ayorarid City Cauncfl are expected b be iruthfut and harvest to best of the ablbty of the presenter. 1. Roll-calF Af~endancs: Torn O'Brien Wendy Newton-Huckabay David Moe St®vs Slddoway Michael Rohm - chaimtan 2. Adoption of the Agenda: 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approve Minutes of February 8, 2007 Plaru9tng & Zoning Commission Special Meeting: B. Approve Mtnutes of April 19, 2007 Planning 8 2:oning Commission Meeting: C. Ftndings ol# Fad and Conclusior~ of Law for Approval: CUP 07.008 Request Por a Condttlonai tJae Permit fir fire operation of an antrrtai care, fadlity in an L-O cone far Liddell Veterinary Clinic by Falash & Rose Consttuctlott - 2300 W. Everest Lane: 4. Continued Public Hearing from naay 3, 2007: PFP 07df01 Requtast for a Preliminary /Final Plat approval to subdivide Lot 13, f3lock 3 of Valiin Courts SubdivlsPon 4o create tavo {2) new lots for 8ant3arah by Walker Woman, inc. - 2673 North Rldgebury Avenue: Metic~an Pd®rordng and Zorrtr~u Commission Meetlrg Agenda- May 97, X07 Page 1 or s AR materiels tad at pubAo meetings ahaN tsaoome properly of the ~ or k9aitt6an. Anyone daeklhg eoexmrnadaNon tar d rotated do doaarrerue arMJor treating. plsasetwnfaat the City CteAc'a t2fltca at 88&-0433 at feast A8 Froure ptiorto the gubDc rr~irtg. Tnt~l Pnnoe Crnnnorl • R Tntal Pangs CnnflrmAd ~ 51 No. Job Remote Station Start Tlme Duration Pages Line Mode lob Type Results 001 331 3810160 12:13:27 p.m.05-14-2007 00:00:00 0/3 1 G3 HS FA 002 331 8989551 12:13:27 p.m.05-14-2007 00:00:44 3/3 1 EC HS CP21600 003 331 8848723 12:13:27 p.m.05-14-2007 00:01:09 3/3 1 EC HS CP14400 004 331 8886854 12:13:27 p.m.05-14-2007 00:00:34 3/3 1 EC HS CP31200 005 331 8985501 12:13:27 p.m.05-94-2007 00:01:19 3/3 1 EC HS CP14400 006 331 8467366 12:13:27 p.m.05-14-2007 00:00:36 3/3 1 EC HS CP28800 007 331 8950390 12:13:27 p.m.05-14-2007 00:00:38 3/3 1 EC HS CP31200 ~ ': r ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~' N 2 r y ti ~ ~{ ~! 1 k~~ppC~~~~~ '~; - Y~ 2" C~ ~:E FA ^i ~4 ~ v M1 + fi t~ . . ~f tp ~ . . ~ ~ ~.~ - 4 ~~ 6 . . - ~ , _ 7k~ ~ v " '! N d ~ E g M C . ~ p ? R - ' r r~ r ~j ~` Yet; } 1~ y ~t • ~ N ~ ) pF i F. jf(~~y~ s' ~ ~?M ~1 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ i 5~~;3 ~~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ uu ~!xi 9 rk S ~ ~ J~I 3 ~ ~ ~~~: . a v ~ ? i ~_ Ca~ ~~Ff ~ u5i ~~~ .c t: ~ ,, 1 ,a ~ ' ` 3qq I h,~. ' 1- ~~ '~ - w7~ s 4' k` ~t ~` ~ ' ~ ~' rj ~ nr t ~~""' M a 3 ~ r V~~t 1 ~~ , ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ r ., n }~'ras Yy 3 ~~P ~~~~ ~ ~1 F '~: Y ~^ ..i ~ :: ~r _ ,s,; _ ~ s' ,,~~ '~ e~ ~ y~'~3.~s~ - #~ ~f,~! ` y '~ ~, ~.~ ~' ~ y;l ~, L lv ~~.x °~ ~.~i' ~7E ~;i;F~ ': ' i • xQ :r ~ . ~ ti~~`~~ .~'~ ,,i~ ,'!' r, ~~ ~ ~ U J V.: ~ x` ~y~ ~'~T~'3 r~~ '~ ~ ~~i f~;i '~ S .~ ~ t i I. d..Y ,~yF th. ~~.~ ~ l . ~y y n °:, ~_ . '> Date/Time r;~; Local ID 1 LocaIID 2 ~,~,: ;;.:.,:, Broadcast Report 05-14-2007 12:44:49 p.m. Transmit Header Text Clty of Meridian Idaho 2088884218 Local Name 1 Llne 1 Local Name 2 Llne 2 No. Job Remote Station Start Time Duration Pages Llne Mode Job Type Results 008 331 2088882682 12:13:27p.m.05-14-2007 00:00:35 3/3 1 EC HS CP33600 009 331 2083876393 12:93:27p.m.05-14-2007 00:09:09 3/3 1 EC HS CP14400 010 331 2877909 12:13:27 p.m.05-14-2007 00:01:09 3J3 1 EC HS CP14400 011 331 2088885052 12:13:27 p.m.05-94-2007 00:00:35 3/3 1 EC HS CP31200 012 331 8881983 12:13:27 p.m.05-14-2007 00:00:41 3!3 1 EC HS CP24000 013 331 2083775449 12:13:27 p.m.05-14-2007 00:01:09 3/3 1 EC HS CP14400 014 331 4679562 12:13:27 p.m.05-14-2007 00:00:40 3/3 1 EC HS CP24000 015 331 8886700 12:13:27 p.m.05-14-2007 00:00:00 0/3 1 -- HS FA 016 331 8884022 12:13:27 p.m.05-14-2007 00:02:04 3/3 1 EC HS CP14400 017 331 3886924 12:13:27 p.m.05-14-2007 00:00:39 3/3 1 EC HS CP24000 018 331 8841159 12:13:27 p.m.05-14-2007 00:00:35 3/3 1 EC HS CP31200 019 331 2088840744 12:13:27 p.m.05-14-2007 00:00:40 3/3 1 EC HS CP26400 Abbreviations: ~,, r, HS: Host send "'~= HR: Host receive ~;;,' WS: Waiting send Yd. w:, ; ~S ~'., ,~r3'1 PL: Polled local MP: Mailbox print TU: Terminated by user PR: Polled remote CP: Completed TS: Terminated by system G3: Group3 MS: Mailbox save FA: FaII RP. Report EC: Error Correct xt" `~ ~q .t ~ 9 ~ a ~~t~t/~~ i 4._ ~ t , ,~ ~ I1 1~.~. - - ~ ~ }*.••. t 1. i t~rE~j S Sir. ~ Y. t i. ; ~ 1 ~) '1G; '~ ~ i. 4 N'. ~ ~ 4". ~ ~ `t ~~ '' d'1 t4, ~' ~ . ~ C.~ ~ •. i , ire ~ ~`~ ~ ' `. ~ ~+ s. cyV- ~ x ~ . L i v-, ~, ~ - ~, i ~ ~~w kS~j,?,µ.,~.r f r'. ~' t'k~ ~ ~ ~h ~.~ ,~ g ~; ;~ v ~ ,:~ z:.~ .4~~ ~ , f ~i . a r. ~ } ~~i ~ ` .,r ~ f ~ I ~ t ~~r-s ti' ` ~n N ~ . S' F+'~ t ~ t Y~ ~ : 17X,, ` " ' r h e; ~ ~ "~y' ~ ` ~ ~~ ~ ~>r~~ r~ p ~' eG ~i~,K ~ ; ~~u ~ ~ ' t~ ~ ~ k ~ r _ V u ' ~ ~ ~, ~., ~~ 1 ~ .~7 ~ µN J ~ ~~yy t1 ~} ~ h ~p iry l~~j i' dµ ~ t S'A. 1.. . r 3 l4~~'~ .-. ~E 1 f•'. ry. d~tee~cY 7 ~ui 1 `, l~ ~~J r~~ ~'~ ~ '1 L y. , . ' ~ '~4 ~ ~~ t ] ~. r. ~~~ 55~ ~ ~ ~'~, ~ ~`A>1" tt ~ ~ ~ ~ . '~~ ... ... Ag 9 .. ..t i ... a Date/Time Local ID 1 Loca11D 2 ,, ,. ,: 4 ~' OS-17-2007 2088884218 ~~'-~ r~•..i e....... c...........a . 2 ': ~ Broadcast Report 09:44:38 p.m. Transmit Header Text Clty of Meridlan Idaho Local Name 1 Line 1 Local Name 2 Llne 2 This document :Failed (reduced sample and details below} Document size : 8.5 "x11 " /~~'~.,~Q~,~~OD1 _ A~ERIRfAN PUINNING AMR ZOtdfN(3 C/YL~iY1GlIl~1? ' REGULAR MI3Et1N93 rawo AGENDA ~ ~ City Council Chambers 33 East Idaho Avenue, Meridlan, Naha Thursday, May 17, 2007 at 7:08 p.m. "AlNta-gh fire cuy Of Men'dian rto torlgerrequbes s>vom t93sttln95rrJ; at! preSentetitms before Lhe Mayor and City Council ere axp®ct®d to ba trultrful and honest tri best of the abflHy ~ the presenter. ° 1. Ralt-ca11 Attendance: Tom O'Brian ~ Wendy Newton-Huckabay David Moe Steve Sidd9>,nray ', Michael Rohm - chairrltarl 2. AdoptianaftheAgenda: .h1"jrJ~Ji''Olh° ~' ~E~~I •3. Cart~snt Agenda: A. Approve M[nutes of February 8, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission Specfa! Maeting: ~p j„ p~ 8. Approve Minutes of April 18, 2007 Planning & Zonltlg GommisSion C. Flndingta of Fast and Cancluslans of Leer far Approval: CUP 07.006 Rerluest for a Conditlanal iJsa PemUt for the operation of an animal care facility in an L-0 zone for LtddeN Veterinary Clinic by Fata9;h S Ross Conatrucxtan - 2300 W. Everest Lana~ppr,~ 4. Contl9tuad Public Nearing from May 3, 2807: PFP 07.801 Request for a Preliminary !Final Plat approval to subdivide Lot 13, Block 3 of Vapin Courts Subdivision to creme two {2) new lots far Benewah by Wa~Car HOmea, Irtc. -2873 North Rid ebury Avenue: ~eomm~d .~piorot<rce `~ U''J ~.,~',2 McAdian Plermtng ami BoNRq Commlaston Messing Ag~de- allay 97, 2007 Page 9093 AO mab~ls presented et puttlk mesdr~a shell ba+gome p~opsrly orthe cih'sP Meodlan. Myone decking acaammodasbn for dissbQHiss mated to dOmtmsntr e1WrOr heerbig, ptsese sordaat ttre Gtty Clerk`s Offiae st 888.4433 at least 48 hwms pdsrta Ore puBlkt me~tng. Tnt~l Donee r'nn4irmori • S1 ' - No. a----_. Job ...__ . - Remote Station Start Tlme Duration Pages Line Mode Job Type Results 001 359 3810160 09:15:34 p.m.05-17-2007 00:00:01 013 1 -- HS FA 002 359 8989551 09:15:34 p.m.05-17-2007 00:00:54 3/3 1 EC HS CP19200 003 359 8848723 09:15:34 p.m.05-17-2007 00:01:18 313 1 EC HS CP14400 004 359 8886854 09:15:34 p.m.05-97-2007 00:00:39 3/3 1 EC HS CP31200 005 359 8985501 09:15:34 p.m.05-17-2007 00:01:17 313 1 EC HS CP14400 006 359 8467366 09:15:34 p.m.05-17-2007 00:00:41 313 1 EC HS CP28800 007 359 8950390 09:15:34 p.m.05-17-2007 00:01:51 3/3 1 EC HS CP21600 ~. ~~~ ~ya~ ~~ . ~,~ ~~,~ i , z - - ~ ` ~` ~~ ~~l y ' ~N ~y~~ 4 L - .'~~ S i b w. ~ .ir.~ d 'tin or ++ y J ~' ; ~ ~ f '{., n %, ~ ~d3 ;a id~ ~ ~ ~~ r " .~ _ ~~~ ~,` e~' 'Y s~~ , , . 't ~3i` w ~ k~ r~~x.~E ~~ . , V ~ ° ' ~ ~ ~' ~' . xGi 3 I t ~ ; ~ ~ a ; ~ L~~~ti fh ~f ~'~ t.'. Y ~ ~ ~, -~ ~rha 1 '. ` i~ tii .r I 7 ._ 4 ~ r ' ~~ ~" i I~ ~k~S .. ~ iY " Y i ~-,: ~' ~ ~- '~' ~Y R~ ~'~`"- y~3 ;i ;. ' ~ ~ C ~ .r~-- K . ~ ~' i ~ t ,.~~~ } ~`k '~ 5t~s ~ ~.~ , ~'~ ~ 5~ r ~ ~ ~ t ' ~a~ "Fx, ~ t t 7 : 't , n,: b ~ C ~ ~~. ' ~; r~-. } 4~ 510. ~, ~~ ~:. ~'-d air c t + ~'~ r~l ~ ` ~ „ , ~ c ~;s-, .:' ,. ~~;: ., -.: s; >~ .`~% <;~r:. :.,:k. ],, ~v:' ~u~ytt ~4 rj: ~s ~xe4~{ K.'~ ~' '; ~~_ ~~~~, ~,::,;, . re~~, a }Sy,: ;: , Broadcast Report ~ ~ Date/Time 04-19-2007 10:39:39 a.m, Transmit Header Text Clty of Merldlan Idaho `~ Local ID 1 2088884218 Local Name 1 Une 1 ~~ Local ID 2 Local Name 2 Line 2 ~'; This document :Failed ~~. (reduced sample and details below) Document size : 8.5 °x11 " / /`~~/,///~fyClyTgY aP ~ a it)aH0 ^ergylYz..wacvwar 4~ IVSAYOR '6mmy fie vtieecd Crrr CovWCtL tVI4Ma~as I:eith Bird Joseph W. Horton Chedas M. Rountree Shaun Wardle =, ,. CRY DEPAR'P1faH75 City Attonxey(E4R 703 Mafn Street 898.3506 (City Attorney) s9s~s5o3 (ltit) Fax BBidr/23 ISre 54d1 li Franklin Road 986-]?3& / fax (195-0090 CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT !NOTICE tS HERESY GIVEN p~suant to the Ordinances of the City of Merldlan and the Laws of the State o4 Idaho. that tl2e Planning and Zonklg Cammlaalon of the City of Merk6an will hold a pi~ilc hearing at the t+Aaridian Clly Hall, 33 East Idaho Avenue. Merldlan, I~ho, at the hour of 7:00 pm: an Thursday. nay 17, 2007, for the pur~sa of reviewitxJ artd considering the epptication 20A 07-001 of City of Merldlan Planning pepartment for a Zoning Qrdinanc~lUntFled Development Code (uDCj Text Amendment to trrodlfy, clean uP and add sperJftc set2forts to the UDC (see appGcatltm for details of all sections proposed for amandmentaj for Unified Davelopmetrt Code Text Amendment 8 2. More partlculat descriptions of the above in/ormatian are on f8a bt the Planning Department, 660 East Watertower Latta, Sulfa 202, Merldlan, Idaho and are available for inspection during regular bu~nass hours, Monday thratigti Friday. from 8:00 e.m. to 5:00 p.m. Copies of the above appltcat~ns are avaltabfa upon request. Any and alt int®r~ted pareans shatr be heard at said poWlc hearhtg, and the public is wratcx:ma end invited to submi! ttlstimorly. Graf tesUrrwny may ba limited to three (3) minutes par perm, Written materials trxty be su#xnittt~ seven (7j days pdor to the above hearing data so that ail lntetested palttas may examine them prior to the hearing. Ail materials presented at public meetings shell bt~arna property of the Criy of Meridian. Anyone desiring accammodatton P:sr disabil'id~ teletsd to documents andlor headngs, please oontad the CRy Clerk's dfftca at 888.4433 at least 72 hours prior to the public meeting. Parka & Rarnaaction t 1 W. Sower fi4'eat A88-3579! ¢ax 85501 Planning 660 E 1Yatertower Ism $ulte 402 A89-5x331 Ear 8i4 Police 14021:. iNateetawer Lane 689-6678 /Ear Sd6-766 Public Works 660 E. Watertower Lam Suite 200 698-55DQ! Eax 898-955] • Building 650 E Watertaurer Lane Suite I50 887 2411 / Lax 867-1297 • Wastewater 3401 Al. Ten ti0le Road 689.3291 / Eax 88A-0794 - Water 2xss rl.w stn street E8&5242 / fax 884-I1.+9 "' J DATED this 8th day of April. 21107 a`~~,•C?~~ 6~f ~ , ,~f6Gy~~~/~/ ~ ~ n~mm u YY~ WILLIAM G. BERG, J , CITY (~E ~ ~o'' page ! of i Ceicv Z3AL1. 33 Errs inAxo AvBtvtJe ivlaiRlncas,t, IDAHO 83642 (2usj 888-+t<133 C(TYCLHRIC-PAXBfiB~Rlt: FINANCLEC 417UTY B1LtlfdG-Fax QV.0.4Ia IAAYOx50Fr7Ck~•FAK8849119 PrL,twi an axyele0 PrM No. Job Remote Station Start Tlme Duration Pages Line Mode Job Type Results 001 161 3810160 10:00:29a.m.04-19-2007 00:00:00 0/1 1 G3 HS FA 002 161 8989551 10:00:29 a.m. 04-19-2007 00:00:25 111 1 EC HS CP19200 003 161 8848723 10:00:29a.m.04-19-2007 00:00:40 7/1 1 EC HS CP94400 004 161 8886854 10:00:29a.m.04-19-2007 00:00:18 1/1 1 EC HS CP31ZQ0 005 161 8985501 10:00:29a.m.04-19-2007 00;00:39 111 1 EC HS CP14400 006 161 8467366 10:00:29a.m.04-19-2007 QO:Q0:23 111 1 EC HS CP28800 007 161 8950390 10:00:29a.m.04-19-2007 00:00:18 1/1 1 EC HS CP33600 l' ~~' '.~..~. .+ `:(.'mot s-:' ~gj=iwi"{rn 7,'''vy~r: ~ r i, ti; ',r ~, ~.~ f , r ~ ~, Ys` fir, ~ li 6 ( ~ i ` ''E ~'f l ' ~ 5 - ;. „ y Y, xT1>S i S, N=~~o ~. .1~ ~2 5. 5 3' ~ T: f: 4z • ~ ~' v r~ r' ~S; I fl v F ,{'i$Ls J ~ t: 4 ~' ~ t „~f .'~F ~ 4 ~. ,~ t h 'k _ n Y; , . y ~ j '~ ,.'? . ~~a c( ~ Sti ,"~, t Ni ? 6Q "( ~'. ' 9?•. 1 """III'" t c~ i ~y p 'gin' l k ~d 'NAg .r t : ~ R t ~ Kok i`?krf A 4 ~~ ~ ,~ Ir ~, ~ `: 4 s ~ ~., .. ~. r ) ~ ~ :~ '. iy~ 4 1 Q d 4Yt -' ' ~ i l C ^, ~,ay~1~'in5 r ~ ~ ~ 9 ' ' t• s q 1 rU ~ ,,. ~ aLt~+T~t'~4 e {' I~~~ ; rr,~...~,~ r a : ,~~ 3 - r .~ , Ea~~~,Ii JL Sa Yry I. ~ ~K I ~ '. '~ r; afi{ *s`2. p ~~I:. .,. ......_ } ... vT.. r .... h { ... s,. ~ ~ '~ Broadcast Report - ~ Date/Time 04-19-2007 10:39:46 a.m. Transmit Header Text City of Meridian Idaho Local ID 1 2088884218 Local Name 1 Line 1 Local ID 2 Local Name 2 Line 2 ;. -,. !+f No. Job Remote Station Start Time Duration Pages Line Mode Job Type Results 008 161 208888 2682 10:00:29 a.m. 04-19-2007 00:00:18 1 /1 1 EC HS CP33600 009 161 2083876393 10:00:29a.m.04-19-2007 00:00:39 111 1 EC HS CP14400 010 161 2877909 10:00:29 a.m. 04-19-2007 00:00:40 111 1 EC HS CP14400 011 161 2088885052 10:00:29 a.m. 04-19-2007 00:00:18 111 1 EC HS CP31200 012 161 8886573 10:00:29 a.m. 04-19-2007 00:01:28 119 1 EC HS CP9600 013 161 8881983 10:00:29 a.m. 04-19-2007 00:00:22 111 1 EC HS CP24000 014 161 2083776449 10:00:29 a.m. 04-19-2007 00:00:40 1 /1 1 EC HS CP14400 015 161 4679562 10:00:29 a.m. 04-19-2007 00:00:20 111 1 EC HS CP26400 016 161 8886700 10:00:29a.m.04-19-2007 OO:OD:00 0/1 1 -- HS FA 017 161 8884022 10:00:29 a.m. 04-19-2007 00:01:04 111 1 EC HS CP14400 018 161 3886924 10:00:29a.m.04-19-2007 00:00:24 111 1 EC HS CP24000 019 161 8841159 10:00:29a.m.04-19-2007 00:00:19 1/1 1 EC HS CP31200 020 161 2088840744 10:00:29 a.m. 04-19-2007 00:00:20 111 1 EC HS CP28800 021 161 2083363736 10:00:29a.m.04-19-2007 00:00:18 111 1 EC HS CP31200 022 161 208-385-7385 10:00:29a.m.04-19-2007 00:00:49 1/1 1 G3 HS CP14400 023 161 3759248 10:00:29 a.m. 04-19-2007 00:00:00 0/1 1 -- HS FA 024 161 3344080 10:00:29 a.m. 04-19-2007 00:00:00 011 1 -- HS FA 025 161 2084722211 10:00:29 a.m. 04-19-2007 00:00:20 111 1 EC HS CP26400 026 161 2083737245 10:00:29 a.m. 04-19-2007 00:00:20 111 1 EC HS CP28800 027 161 2083816681 10:00:29a.m.04-19-2007 00:00:19 111 1 EC HS CP28800 028 161 208 375 7770 10:00:29 a.m. 04-19-2007 00:00:55 111 1 G3 HS CP14400 029 161 5773319 10:00;29a.m. 04-19-2007 00:00:55 111 1 EC HS CP14400 "°-~` Abbreviations: ''" HS: Host send x' "' HR: Host receive "-` WS: Waiting send 1 l ~ .;+~ t~ ca:. -_ i PL: Polled local MP: Mailbox print TU: Terminated by user PR: Polled remote CP: Completed TS: Terminated by system G3: Group 3 MS: Mailbox save FA: Fail RP: Report EC: Error Correll ~,: '~ -- r yy ~~ e :~ F : .v:. . t ,p y +h} ~ v ~+~~a !r a~, ;, ~ _ i ~~,,Y~r z'' °c~tl ~ it 4 ~~. "3 ~~ti~, ~p^ i u ~ ~H" ~ ~S, r~ 4 r rai r ~~ ~ l a ei, t a'v ' ~ ~ '~ ~~} 'L ~~ .. S 1. r 3~ 3 i ~, i Ass ~ 4 ' ~ ~~s;~i ~" ~F ~ i v _ +~ 4A ~. des,' ~y}~ ti. , T A~ '. f-'; J~ i 1 ~,a ~•..i.t ~ f i ~ ~7 ~ I F' ~ ' r~ A+~or ~ t ~f ` k ~ i ~ +:, _~ ~ r:r' cy r s'. ' ~ ~' ~, ~` - r i ~ ~~ ~7 ~ ~ ~ s• 6v { M r ,~ x , . 4' ~~ ~ ~t~~~h ~ 1 ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ' . {~ 7~' ~ ~I6' F 7_ ~: ~~~ ~ ~' ~ ~S~ ~ ~ ~ i u ' '+1 { ~+ '. ~ ~ ~ t yp~5~{ ~ i 1.i p ~ 9 ~ t, - 1. F i~.~;,~ .o- ., ; Sacks-bi. Y ~ ~h~ lc:. _ 3 ~ _ ~ • Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Mav 17, 2007 The regular meeting of the Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:00 P.M., Thursday, May 17, 2007, by Chairman Michael Rohm. Members Present: Michael Rohm, David Moe, Steve Siddoway, Tom O'Brien, and Wendy Newton-Huckabay. Others Present: Ted Baird, Machelle Hill, Caleb Hood, Amanda Hess, Sonya Wafters, Scott Steckline, and Dean Willis. ~ Item 1: Roll-call Attendance: s<, ~~~ ~, , ~: ~- ,~: <. :~ , ~- ~' F, ~`~ ~ . '<~ -: Roll call. X Tom O'Brien X Wendy Newton-Huckabay X David Moe X Steve Siddoway X Michael Rohm -Chairman Rohm: Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. At this time I'd like to call the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission to order and begin with roll call of Commissioners. Item 2: Adoption of the Agenda: Rohm: Okay. The first item on the agenda is the adoption of the agenda and there are a number of changes to this agenda tonight and I will just list the changes that we will be going through and we will adopt an amended agenda from that. The -- Item No. 7, which is RZ 07-009, related to the Jabil Southeast, will be continued until the regularly scheduled meeting of June 7th. Items 10, 11 and 12, related to Pinebridge, will be continued to the regularly scheduled meeting of June 21st. And Item No. 14, which is CUP 07-001 related to Strate Apartments, will be continued to the regularly scheduled meeting of June 7th, 2007. Those three changes to the agenda will be taken in their order, but those adjustments will be noted now. So, with that being said, could I get a motion to accept the amended agenda? Moe: So moved. Siddoway: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to accept the amended agenda. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 3: Consent Agenda: a- `~~ ;~. I. ,~ ` ~ x .~ ~<~ ~~~ ~r~ ~~p3 ~Yt~~ ~ T ~w `Y ~.... fi t x 1 44 ~ 7/ ~~~Ci y i ~ l ~~ b' 7JF ~ ft C w'F Jj k d " ~ ~~ t f'~ k J', ~_ ' ~ f ~ .- ~k k 1` "~' ^ ~ ~ . ti~;" t lw t ~ ~rd~+" ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~. ~ r,~ Gl ~g ~ , t c .~~1;~. ' s { ,r. r" r' ' ~~~~ . > i { :,~ ~; S{r. 4 ~h~r~l +~ C ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~, ~ ' 1 , ~~~~h k 1 f r ~'~. ~' ~ ~ ~.y Kr~'4~ ~ irc'~ t~1 -~'. Y~. r '/k k.. t7~ 'tie `! ~_. tl ~~ t 'k ~d ~: 4 ~'~i L ~ jS~ •~l~`f ~ fl4~ y 11 ~~'i ~'. ~ ~ ~.. i ; 4 ~ jL~ "~ T. ~ SAS'.. ,~_. ti ry ~ ~ }~~t",`~ F~ ~ zt y ~ D r,~ri; r ; s r `~ ~~-- x.~ ~ ~ if ~I ~ Ra i ~" r ~ ~~ b ~y, ~~~1 ~f yf ~.' ~~ ~ ;,; " Meridian Planning & Zoning ` May 17, 2007 `. ~` ' Page 2 of 38 ~,. z A. Approve Minutes of February 8, 2007 Planning & Zoning ~~- Commission Special Meeting: ~:,, '`'w~` B. Approve Minutes of April 19, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting: ~a~.: ~ C. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for Approval: CUP 07-006 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for the operation of an ' animal care facility in an L-O zone for Liddell Veterinary Clinic by y Falash & Ross Construction - 2300 W. Everest Lane: ~~ Rohm: Okay. The next item on the agenda is the Consent Agenda and that is the ~~ approval of the February 8, 2007, Planning and Zoning Commission special meeting ~'_'~` minutes. Item B is to approve the minutes of April 19th, 2007. And Item C is the ~`' Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for approval of CUP 07-006. Could I get a ~} motion to approve the Consent Agenda? Well, first of all, is there any correction to any of the minutes? r;: ~ Moe: I have none. ^ Siddoway: I have none. ~. Rohm: Okay. ; . Siddoway: Mr. Chairman, I move to approve the Consent Agenda as proposed. ~,~~ Moe: Second. i All th d ' " ose n a. s been moved and seconded to approve the Consent Agen Rohm: It '. , favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. I MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. t ' go d like to jus E ~' ~ Rohm: Okay. Now, before we open up any of the hearings tonight, I ~-~:~~~ through a few of the procedural items associated with our hearings and, basically, the way this process works is we will open up a particular project and we will begin with the staff report. The staff will present the project as it pertains to the Unified Development Code and the Comprehensive Plan. They will make their recommendations and note all ' ~ ~~ the things that they would like to see changed from the original application. Once the staff report has been completed, then, the applicant has an opportunity to get up and '`' F ct from their ers ective. Once those two resentations have been resent the roe p p P J p P ~~: completed, then, the public is welcome to make their feelings known. If there is an individual that represents a homeowners association or a large body of individuals, that person generally would be somebody that would speak first and they would be speaking ~: `k"' on behalf of a larger group of people and will be afforded, I believe, ten minutes to ~ 1~,.,1t . _ _1. h~, ,~ rF°. r 'M fl~O'^~i' ~ J:'L #} ~ 4N~" 'uY i^~ ~ T f•.~ ~t } ' Y~ r F I 4 1 ~~'F K; ~ ~$~ ~~. L ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ P,j+ ~ a ' 41'9 S } _ t~ ~'~ ( ~ ~ ao ~~ '. ~ 1~ t ~ II~~ ~ V I d~Y ,~ x~~~ A _ N r ~ - ~ '-'. n s~:r + N ~ ~ ~ M k y Si~ S ~~t~( ~ t~'k'~i ; ~ ~~ qC' ~ r': ` } ', t: ~~ ~T ire , aaj S~f'~*~i'~ L ~~F a~,iz ~ h ~tr51;t ~. ~`~f~ u ~` . z ~z f x r J i{ v k dam- ~ ~ kufa ~- ~ 7Y ~~ ~ C { }£.~~ ' e ~3 Y 1 > "~,~ ~ k ~ ~,. JD :' x.4.'!'=4; ~ ~ _ j ~y` J VQ~.. i J ~ ~~`~ ' A t r '.h ~~ # ~ i r , '~c ~ r 3 ~ F, S i~, .~„ . ~ ~. ~~ 5 ~..:r G }~~ .7. ~. ~ ~'r"~~, ti ~ 4 f C~.~ ~ ,..~. 1 _, ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~;r t Y f ~'~i ~' ?~54 'mss tia ,~ > r . ~ r ~ ~~,. n ~~ - _ ~ .~: r 2:.~ * ~ a ti. ~ y ~Pr:'r .. ~# tii~,~ r A: -~~ L~ Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 3 of 38 speak. If, in fact, there is not somebody that's speaking for a homeowners association, then, each individual has three minutes to make their case. Once all public testimony has been taken, the applicant has an opportunity to come back up and respond to each and every comment from the public. Once that's completed, the hearing is generally closed, unless someone on the Commission specifically has a question of an individual, but this is -- doesn't tum into a debate, it doesn't -- the applicant, once he responds to any questions from the public, generally speaking a hearing will be closed. At that time we will deliberate and either continue or make a recommendation to City Council at that point. Item 4: Continued Public Hearing from May 3, 2007: PFP 07-001 Request for a Preliminary /Final Plat approval to subdivide Lot 13, Block 3 of Vallin Courts Subdivision to create two (2) new lots for Benewah by Walker Homes, Inc. - 2673 North Ridgebury Avenue: Rohm: So, with that being said, I would like to at this time open the continued Public Hearing from May 3rd, 2007, of PFP 07-001, related to Benewah and begin with the staff report. Hess: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. The application before you is a request for preliminary/final plat approval. The subject property totals approximately half of an acre and is located within the Vallen Court Subdivision. This is the Vallen Court Subdivision right here. The subdivision is generally located south of Ustick Road and West of Meridian Road. The applicant proposes to subdivide Lot 13, Block 3, into two new lots. The new lot sizes total approximately 8,900 square feet and 10,600 square feet. Fast forward to the plat there. The subject subdivision is currently zoned R-8. Access to the development will be from Meridian Road by either Salisbury Lane or Clearbrook Estates Subdivision. That's these two subdivisions right here. Each of the proposed lots will have individual driveway access to North Ridgebury Avenue. The only issue to mention here is that perimeter fencing was not depicted on the preliminary plat and staff requests the applicant provide testimony this evening as to whether fencing will be constructed around the proposed subdivision. Staff has no concerns with the proposal, therefore, staff is supportive of the subdivision as submitted. And that is all staff has, unless the Commission has questions. Rohm: Good. Thank you very much. Any questions of staff? Siddoway: Just one. ~;~~ Rohm: Commissioner Siddoway. ~~ Siddoway: Amanda, can you just clarify what -- why the larger lot was there in the first place? Was it originally a stormwater lot or anything like that or was it a building lot? Hess: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commissioner, there was actually an existing home on the one lot at the time. { A ; ~ gg ~ u7+- ~~ ~~ r ~ ^?:7~s ~x d3? 1~ i ~S 1 ~ F~ ~ ~. yp ~~N f,S w, .~~.. ~,~77 k~~~.r ~ A1~7~ 7,~. Z ; k, ~y 3 F ~'il~r n 3v-- ~ ~~.-. dS-~ 4 1 i.t'. ~t li. Lh.. S ~y,.fr ~ ~~ ~ ~ /'~ "9~{'~ p tfi 4~,:; 1 ;~_.. ~7k ~ _, .~k ~~~4-•~ ~~T~~ ~ ~~~(~' C {i f ~:r~?i .{ 1 ~ ;i7~. 1 A :'..~, f 4 x.~'. ~7 ffr~.. ? ~ =~:J~ ~~ 7d ~ is r4. Y i z,.' ~~_ .6,~ i r ~kY Ei~"~~~ , ~ ; ~4 ~ '?1,x, x t ~~ ~;M iG;~ ~~"3 v ,;: ~ t r t~ k ~ ! . :~ ~, a , . ys~ ~ j~. ~s' ~ j ~y~~~ ~: ~ .i ~ ~ 7 ~;~~, Ft. Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 4 of 38 Siddoway: Okay. Hess: And I'm assuming they wanted a larger lot, but now I think the home has been demolished. Siddoway: Thank you. '~` Rohm: Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward, please. Do we have an applicant for the Benewah project? That's - we may be moving so fast that they are just not here yet. How about that? That's a first. Well, I don't think I want to -- let's -- ~~` we are going to see if anybody has signed up to testify to this application. Okay. Mr. Baird. Baird: Mr. Chair, if you're looking for some direction on how to proceed, it's a pretty straight forward application. There is no requirement that he would receive any testimony from the applicant. You have the application before, the staff comments. If it's the pleasure of this body, you can proceed with your decision. ,.~ Rohm: Yeah. I think that the only thing that I wanted to hear is from the staff report she actually wanted the applicant to speak to the perimeter fencing and without having that testimony I guess we could make a motion to just making that a requirement and make it specific to the application and move forward. And maybe that's the right thing to do. We do not have anybody that has signed up to testify to this application, so I guess we will -- is there anyone from the audience that would like to testify to this application? Okay. Discussion? Any discussion before we move to close the Public Hearing? Moe: Mr. Chair, of staff, as far as perimeter fencing, you're just looking at three sides of ~~ fencing? Is that what you're looking for? '` Hess: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, yes, the north side of the lot -- there :, is a micro pathway, so there would be a required -- which I'm assuming is already in ~':: Vallen Court Subdivision, but just in case -- I'm getting direction from my associate here that it is in already. So, what we would be looking at would be just the perimeter -- I ~' also gather from my associate that the west is also in. So, it looks like there already is '_=~ ": existing perimeter fencing around the entire lot, so -- Moe: Therefore, there wouldn't be a need -- Hess: Correct, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. ~~ .: ~' " ~ Moe: Oh. Okay. ~~: ;~_' Rohm: Okay. Moe: And we are sure of that, so we don't need to deal with that, then? •} ~ ,~, ~,~, : ' ~hr~~~~~W ~54 ~ ~~ f 1~~ ~~ nj`'''~?~~S i ~j p { ~ •~ 1'.Y..~ .L ~~~I~yf•~~M~ 5' X~ ~SY ~ V_~~_. yy a ~~ ~, L A~~~x _yi ~~~ t ~~~~ i. 1 i ~~~~•~~ ~ii:.iY} K r ~~1y Zi ~s ~. ~~ k v f t ' fi`r` ~„ c ~3~,r~$~ x k ; ~~ ~, w~ ~ '~a u~w~" r~,f' ~ ~~~ .~ ~ s~ k+. c,. ~ w ~ h lr ~ ~f kQ ~ ~.~~ _ r ~, ~, ~~t ~~ ~. ~2~~ jR ': ~, { ~ ~ - ~ ~~n i 'w' YYY ~~$k~ t~{ ~ l d J.G"• k-.... i L ~ 9~ fs7 ~ ~'Fq"4 "y k S~ ~ [ # s F a i ~ ~ ' r ff kh~, ~ ~~ i ti T > 1Y ~? er 'kx. u.~`'~I{,~ ~° ~: Y aft ~ - _ r x v ~: ~ -. t S.-..:'. ~`, ..w . ~ r r l.; 'p Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 f Page 5 of 38 Hess: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, I'm pretty sure that -- my associate Sonya Wafters was the -- did work on the final plat for the subdivision, so she's pretty aware of what happened out there. Rohm: Okay. Good. All right. Well, with that being said, then, could we get a motion ~~h to close the Public Hearing on Item PFP 07-001? Moe: So moved. ;~ t?4. is >t;. ,. r .<. Siddoway: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on PFP 07-001. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Moe: Mr. Chairman? Rohm: Commissioner Moe. Moe: Is there any other discussion? After considering all staff -- no applicant and no public testimony, I move to recommend approval to City Council of file number PFP 07- 001 as presented during the hearing of May 17th, 2007, with no other modifications. End of motion. Newton-Huckabay: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to forward onto City Council recommending approval of PFP 07-001. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 5: Continued Public Hearing from May 3, 2007: PP 07-009 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 52 residential lots, 2 office/commercial lots and 10 common lots on 19.80 acres in an L-O zone for Meadowlake Village North by Touchmark of the Treasure Valley, LLC -SEC of Franklin Road and Touchmark Way: Item 6: Continued Public Hearing from May 3, 2007: CUP 07-008 Request for a Conditional Use Permit approval to create 52 residential lots, 2 office/commercial lots and 10 common lots in an L-O zone for ~~- Meadowlake Village North by Touchmark of the Treasure Valley, LLC - _y_ `~' SEC of Franklin Road and Touchmark Way: ~~_ ;~ ~w~ .,- ~y r~ 'Y''X ~'. ~ z a.r' '~, x 5 a fJ J ~{.. S k¢ ~~_ ~'- ~ 4 ~C t ~ ' ~ ~~, ~ ~:~ r ~ at, a~ .~. ~ ~ ~~; ~ ~~a ~~~; ,. ,~ yr.k }„ ~h 1E ` ~.r t i l in~ S._k {. Vp 15 ~~~ f Y S~ Y ~~r~ 1~y ~~ ~~yZ ~~§hx~r~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ^1~ NH,h ( K w~J y U ' 1~?= y ~~' 1 q e' ks ~~,~ ~yi Y X14 i ,~~~,.. ;i a .-,~ ~ u =?G~,.. ~ ~ ;~~ E t~'Y'- ~~` a ,, d~~~~v<.s ~e [ a ~; ~ r. Kai ~~ Rd"":h ' l '_ ~~ z~~i~ k[ r~J' ~p'y~ 1n ~~Iyy! i& 3a: /! ~•1 i~' 3{ r [ ~ nM a~ i ~ .: J', { ;. w N. ~ ~ it , i~-: ~_ .~MS~H, ~ i .~ y>~. td ,~ ., t r 7 v'-;~ p ~, ,.r x. F~ ~,r ~ {}h .,'r ~ 4 f ; ~JF Kc 7c n+ Y ~}~.. ~ ~~ ~. r k? " w~,c 1 '-~ L s ~~-~~ ~, _~ ~~r, ,, ., i S .~4 !. ~_;~. ~. -: Meridian Planning 8~ Zoning May 17, 2007 ~ - Page 6 of 38 Rohm: At this time I'd like to reopen the Public Hearing from May 3rd, 2007, of PP 07- 009 and CUP 07-008, both items related to the Meadowlake Village North and begin with the staff report. ~'~~ Hess: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. The application before you is the Meadowlake Village North Subdivision. The applicant Touchmark of the Treasure Valley had applied for conditional use approval to modify the conceptual PD for the Meadowlake Village development. Concurrently, the applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval of 52 single family residential lots, ten common lots, and two office commercial lots on 19.8 acres. The applicant has also applied for a variance and a modification to the existing development agreement for the site. First, I'll give a little ~'~~ background on the development. In 2001 Meadowlake Village was annexed and granted conceptual approval for a planned development to house a mix of office, retail, single-family residential and multi-family residential uses in an L-O zone. The subject site, which totals approximately 160 acres, was proposed to develop in multiple phases. A development agreement was recorded which outlined requirements of construction for each of the phases. Each of the phases required detailed Conditional Use Permit approval. Okay. The proposed Meadowlake Village North Subdivision is generally ~~k located on the south side of Franklin Road off of Touchmark Way. As you can see, this is Eagle and this is Fairview. To the north, south and west of the proposed subdivision, which is what's highlighted here, is undeveloped property within the Meadowlake Village development. To the east is the Ridenbaugh Canal here, which separates the subdivision from the Edgeview Estates Subdivision. The sole access to this phase of the development will be from an existing public street, South Touchmark Way, which is right here. All internal roads will be public streets. No stub connections are proposed x from this phase to adjacent future phases of Meadowlake Village. City staff is generally supportive of the proposed street layout, except for the cul-de-sac length as you can see. The applicant has provided approximately 5.12 acres of open space on the site, exceeding five percent minimum required by the UDC. The majority of open space will be in the form of parkways throughout the entire development. There are a couple of issues highlighted in the staff report for the Commission. The first is that the streets - within the subdivision, as previously stated, are proposed to terminate -- terminate dead-end in cul-de-sacs. The applicant is requesting a variance from the UDC standard to allow the streets within the space to exceed the maximum 450 foot cul-de-sac length. `~~+ From South Touchmark Way, which is right here, via Nissler Court, which is this one, that totals approximately 1,250 feet. From Touchmark Way to Beal Court, that totals approximately 950 feet. Not only is staff supportive of connectivity within this development to future phases via stub connections, but staff believes that the Meadowlake Village property -- I'll move back to the slide here. Staff believes that the , Meadowlake Village property is large enough to accommodate this type of development, while fully complying with the UDC standards. Staff believes there are no topographical features or other physical characteristics of the lot which would prevent full compliance with the UDC. Additionally, the Commission should note that all previously approved concept plans, as you see right here, depict anorth-south roadway through the east portion of the site to promote better traffic flow and connectivity within the development. It is for these reasons that staff recommends denial of the applicant's "~ ~ - ,~. ~.. s, ;; • ?~~~;~ Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 7 of 38 variance request. The other issue addressed in the staff report is that the applicant provides staff the office commercial elevation -- office and commercial elevations for these two lots here. Staff also requested the applicant provide a concept plan establishing the layout of the lots. Staff has not received either the elevations or the . concept plan. Therefore, staff recommends that the Commission decide this evening if ~~~~ approving the application is in the best interest of the city without first reviewing these ~~ elevations and plans for these office lots. Staff approves of the preliminary plat, ~.: ~~..; Conditional Use Permit, and development agreement modification applications. ''~ However, staff does recommend denial of the subject variance application. And that is all staff has, unless the Commission has questions. ;~ Rohm: Good. Thank you very much. Any questions of staff? `r~' Siddoway: Not at this time. ~~ - Rohm: Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward, please? Johnson: Good evening, Chairman Rohm, Commissioners. My name is Megan Johnson with WIG Design, 1173 East Winding Creek Drive, Eagle, Idaho. 83616. I am the applicant's representative, Touchmark, and at this time I'd like to introduce ~` Executive Vice-President of Touchmark for development Mr. Bruce Dalrymple. He "` would like to just give an overall view and the vision of Meadowlake Village and, then, I ' will come back and address the staff report. .. ~' b: :; ~s. ~: e~, .:: r ,<l =a ~~~ Dalrymple: Good evening, Commissioners. Bruce Dalrymple, 5150 Southwest Griffith Drive, Beaverton, Oregon. 97005. Executive vice-president for Touchmark. If I could have you maybe go back to the slide that was the first one that you showed, whoever has the control -- there we go. That one will work just great. Thanks. What is currently developed right now in this development is we have two phases of residential property developed there with single family homes and also a few duplexes in there as well. We are under construction in here. We have just finished our grand lodge and we have a Sun Valley independent apartment building and also we have an assisted living property there of 62 units. So, we have a number of phases as we continue to go through this to develop it out. But one of the things I wanted to explain to you is that when this was initially approved as a PD, all of these streets were private streets in the areas where we did our residential development, whereas we did have some public streets associated with this development as well for some of the circulation. We are looking right now at public streets, only because we are looking at platting this new subdivision or these new lots. These lots down here were not platted and to be able to insure that we have a finite matrix of how we build our homes, we wanted to plat this. But what happened is that your ordinances changed since the time that we had received approval on the PD and so that's the only reason why we have sought public streets as a part of this preliminary plat. Our preference is to have the private streets. In regard to the issue of connectivity, I think that it's important to take a look at the macro portion of this, as much as looking at it from the micro side, and if you -- and what I mean by that is if you were to look at just simply this subdivision or this preliminary plat and not take into _ ___~_ } h y:~ 11 ~ ~ ~. ~ w ~f ' 4~ {'~ ' ~ ~~} t ~{ 1u' ~} ~7~c ti ~ k ~~~'a~ ~! ~a ~i 1. 5 ~~ vey ~ ~ i 4 :, i, ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ i _ li'~ ~ ~ f `+ _ T4 ~ ~ a R'f~ r ~~ ~ ~ ~` ,.~ tr ~:`i lr `~ '~$>S~ ~~~ s y~~,y~' r~ ~~~~ ~y 1'S ` ~~y~ ~ ~ k: ~5 $ 7' - ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~a~, s?. ~, . ~ tff~ ~ t -~-:~ .€~kj'`tl ~rr~' ~ ~ ,P' ;°Y ~ , - x 5~~' • ,~ r ~,~ Yi '^ r 70' ~ '~ 3a 5 ' 4 F~~ 4 g r k rr - r~ a t t ~~--~ ~ ; ,y y ~'Ar~ -.. sk r a Y 1 j d XjsH r ~ ~,'~', X .~,,~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~~~t ,.~ _ ~,~, i-?b ! i thl4~ j M :~T~ ~3 k i ; ` ~~~ ~ -~ ~ . r t j & z-s. Y dell '[~:~. ~~~~Ar r ~$~ ~ ~~ Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 8 of 38 consideration the rest of the development that we have here, we have an integrated ~~-. transportation or area circulation plan that we feel is pretty well thought out in terms of ~~ how we have designed it and implemented it and so we do have connectivity here ~` through our street system, through St. Luke's, an adjacent property. Also up here in the Montvue area. And, then, also two areas onto Franklin. This one here is constructed and shown, but this map doesn't show that connectivity. And so I'm hoping ``' that you will look at this as our development trying to create a sense of place, trying to ~` create neighborhoods, and in those neighborhoods not to have the cut-through traffic, but, really, to be able to have the safe environment for the people to be comfortable and walk on the streets. This is an active adult, 55 and greater, community. So, those are :' ou to take that into consideration in terms of looking at this I'd like me reasons wh y y so more from a macro than only looking at it from a micro position. And I think that's all I have to say for this moment. Any questions? Okay. Thank you. Johnson: Megan Johnson again. I'm going to address the commercial conceptual site layout. I guess the commercial parcels were incorporated into the project simply due to ;~ their proximity to the residential units and, Amanda, could you, please -- maybe the first -- yeah. That will be fine. So, you can see, especially this one, if we went ahead and platted it, we would almost be parcelizing it anyway, so it just made sense -- well, we needed to include it in the plat. And the same with this one as well. It's always been designated as town center commercial on the master concept plan. That hasn't ~~ - changed. But at this time it's not ready to develop. So, when I spoke with Amanda about the conceptual layout, our solution was that we would agree to come in for another Conditional Use Permit at the time that the commercial parcels were ready to "~~ develop and she also iterated to me that one of the concerns that she wanted to see a K site layout was they really wanted to control access from Touchmark Way, actually have ~~} no access on Touchmark Way and we are fully supportive of that. That wasn't our intent. And so we would like to place a condition on the preliminary plat approval that we will come in for a Conditional Use Permit at the time the commercial develops and r that no access will be taken off Touchmark Way to the commercial parcels. We feel that's a good solution and it's awin-win for both parties, it allows the city to review the design and layout at such time that it's ready to be developed. Let's see. The other -- I "~?~`~~~ guess, again, coming back to the variance, the cul-de-sac length, I've had three the Meridian fire department deputy chief, and he was conversations with Joe Silva , generally acceptable of this emergency access. I also think it's important to realize that this is -- Louise Dlrive, it looks like a very long emergency access, but it will be built out in the future as a -- a collector road and we will really feel that a stub street in this location will divert the traffic from the collector road through the residential area as a cut ~~ `` through and as an active adult community we really wanted to kind of keep that safe, ~, secure feeling for the residents. That is one of the major concerns in active adult E! communities. In the second -- we also talked with Joe about the turning radius and "~~ radius does meet fire department standards and the right of ways are public. I turnin g think there was some confusion in the staff report about the exact width. They are 50 foot right of ways, with 34 feet of pavement and eight foot parkways on either side, with detached sidewalks. So, we are really trying to -- with the detached sidewalks and parkway system all along here, pedestrian paths along here, we are trying to focus T. , r~a- 5~ ~. ~ xN l a Y - Vti ~~, ° {y Y `~ rs,' rtt I ~: st ~ ~~ ,!;T~ ~ tt ?r;!1. 1 T ~.{~ tt F ~t t i ~~ 1- ~ /= 4~ , 11aa~~ 4~# r {~ A N. ~~~ 4 ~v" ~'~~nk 3 r ~ y ,~~ is i':: ' r ~~. ~:~ t- ~ c :~ . ~r t y~E: ~ is ^ ~ V e ""` ' i ewe ~' ~~,~ fti.>> ,~~~ sF a~s7 '''E ~• z e ~r haw ~j`.,~.: nr ~t) Ji~l ,.' n ,- t '~ I•;j ~ t L l~~ . ~S ~'"7 ~ ~`~ 7_. i ~ ~~ ~ ' $ f~Ye ~!~ ~S~F ~ . ~~i, ~t et 'r p ~?~'., ~ h F Ci... .. .~~~ k:,~:.. 3_' y ~_ y '~: p ~ ~ .77 [ 1 H.I. r; ~t~ tS y„ A ... ...,.. i ~. k _~ l i • ffr ~[~ }i~ ,. ~ ~,; ~: _. [~~' ,~ Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 9 of 38 more on pedestrian connectivity with this subdivision, because, as Mr. Dalrymple said, the connectivity to adjacent parcels outside of Meadowlake Village is addressed with the extension of Louise to the Montvue and the extension to St. Luke's and Franklin Road and we do have some pedestrian paths here, with a nice open area. A pedestrian path from Cutter Lane connecting to this collector road future Louise Drive. And as well as they would be able to use the emergency access as a pedestrian way. And that's, really, the intent and focus of the community. That was our reasoning behind this design. And, again, as I stated, we did show this to Joe Silva and he was -- he was happy with it. At that point I was surprised to see the staff report, frankly. So, if you have any questions, I'm happy to answer at this time. Moe: Mr. Chairman? Rohm: Commissioner Moe. Moe: Megan, I'm kind of curious in regards to the emergency access. What kind of a time frame are you guys looking to develop that into a roadway section through there? Johnson: For Louise Drive? Moe: Basically, to the north side of this development. Johnson: The collector road? I think I would actually have to defer that question to Mr. Dalrymple. I'm not sure what their development schedule is for the land north of the subdivision. Moe: But the collector road is planned for sure? Johnson: Yes. Yes, it is. It is in one of the development agreements that was adopted with this plan. Moe: Thank you. Rohm: Any other questions? O'Brien: Mr. Chairman? Rohm: Commissioner O'Brien. O'Brien: Okay. When I first looked at this picture, I -- I looked at meandering streets and how it may affect -- as Mr. Dalrymple had mentioned, people will be walking on the streets, rambling around, and with all the trees and bushes, et cetera, around the curves, this might hinder visibility both by pedestrians and vehicles, daytime or nighttime, and I was curious about that. So, I went to the local police department and talked to a Dwight Hosford, he's a sergeant with the traffic department, and he really didn't have any concerns on the thing, but the other parts of the developments do not i. :; i~ `.r e ,~. ~- N ~. ~f ~ ~ !E b ~ ~ k,~ ' { 1~, ~ s ,~ ~ ~i. ~'.' ~~ ~ ~~ ~f,_ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ t~ iu; ` ~'ti ~p ~7 5'y ~ A ~a f.l ~. Y'?is f ~t y. ~ ~~~{~ ~_y ~ tiJ (Q i.L. PZ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 *J'vk ys4fi:~~r ~, RW . ~ T'. f ~ ~}~~ ~ r,',. ~ ~~Y ~ •~,. y 4~ ,r.> .C L, , ~?.:. yysaa,~ ^~~•~./J~ 3~ .rr r ~ ~ ~S~ i^ ;,1~ i} ~'+ , ~ .+a ~ ~ .~ :~ ye G i ~ yQ f,, ~~ y? jQ( A ti ~. ~ ~ a~ j~,~*fi i 1 ~ ~Z11~ y. ~~9c~ 3p1 ra~f ^,~: 1~1 ~~ ti~ . +4 ~ f T1' t {'~ , f- t y V~' ~ ~ T ~ ~=~ , r ~ ~ i~ f 1 i + . 'L ~~: ~ Y ~•~t c ~ `hywY !_ ~ 5. E y, L-1 ~.. ~~~~~. ~ ~ i ~ }„fit ~ : ' ~ y ~ ~' i AR i ~ ~ L'. dr'C' .~ err ~3~ tl..fJ ~ ~ ~ ..~i ~. Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 10 of 38 ~'}~ have these type of meandering streets, as radical as these are, compared to the other ~~ ~ ones. So, those are concems that I had. Again, he didn't have that concern so much in - _ ~`~ that he felt that because they are curved so much that they would have a tendency to slow people down, where they do have concerns with is the construction phase where landscaping, people, and other things come through there and go from site to site and ~ these cause problems, because I think you can only park on one side of the street in what I read and so these are concems during that particular phase, not so much after ~_~, this thing is developed. So, my concems were alleviated, I guess, by talking with him, s; to get a clarification on that, but there is still, at 25 miles an hour going around there, I ~ hesitate to totally agree with him. I was a policeman myself one time and I know some ~.~ : of the issues that we are talking about. So, those are just something I just wanted to put on record if maybe someone -- I don't know -- in Meridian or staff or someone could look ~~ at that to make sure that when this is fully developed and all the trees are grown, are we going to have a problem. Those are my concems. `~~~ Johnson: And those are very valid concems, Commissioner O'Brien. I do know, according to the staff report, the police did have a condition as far as the type of landscaping regarding height of bushes and so forth and I believe that's part of their crime prevention through design. I can't remember the acronym completely. ~~~ O'Brien: Okay. So that you notice that the dwellings are so close together and the setbacks are relatively short and minimal, that was one of the things people backing out ~ of a driveway on a curve, how are they going to see -- or vice-versa, how they can see ~~; ° each other to me is an accident waiting to happen. Those are my concems. Thank ~; you. ~`" Rohm: Any other questions of the applicant? Okay. Thank you. Do you have some additional testimony you'd like to offer? Dalrymple: If I may -- t h `? ~ Rohm: Absolutely. ~. Dalrymple: -- respond to a couple questions that were asked -- ,, Rohm: Absolutely. s Dalrymple: -- if that's possible. In regard to the time frame, in relationship to Louise and ,. ~:.~ whatever might happen up here, and, then, connection going forward, what I can tell you right now is we are looking -- we are planning that right now. I mean we are looking ~`,` ' at how to plan it. Louise will go through. It's not whether it will or it won't or whether or not we want to change that and do something different like Avenue H that was there. - ~ Louise will go through. It's a part of our plan, it's not something that we want to omit. ~. ~ -~ So, you know, it's going to take us a couple years, probably, to sell all these units that are here, as far as the single family and I would imagine that we would be in the period -m~ of something like a two to three year period, something like that, in order to be able to ,~ ' ~~ ~ ~ _ ~; ~ ~ ~ >~ ~ ~ S , r, y.~ „ ti. ~ ~r~ ~ fg ti--, { }~'; T ~~~~~ ~ : yy ~7~F ~~ ~~ ". C f < r ~` '~` f ~ r '~ '; - '~ i ~ ~ i.i y.Y?yC` ~ ~ ~~ 3 1 i ~: ~ ~+~ ~. 57T'rti, ~ '' ~ c '~ ~ . `- i ~. ~ ~}~ i _ e "` ~ri~ ~ s~ 4, i Y t ~ ~' % ~ . 4 ; , ~ i y7cf ~ .41 - ~ a lw A y, ~ L t r ~ f A f ~~7rk~~t~'l~ 2v-~~ ~~r ~ ' ~ p'~ ~~~ f s ~L ~, ~ 4 .~ ~, ~~n ~~ti' ~ ~~+ '~ yrc r ¢ ,y t i' ~ ~+ Vi=e ~~ ~tN~~;. t }° ~ t % ~iN i ~ { .r. ~ ~ '" y ' ~ .+ 4; ~ -,' ' S~~ ,~ r ~; ~ggy77y ~ ~~ i a ~ ,t r - o 4S ti~~~ ,dj. r ~' ~~ ~ y Y >S `{,~ .r+ t*, ~f#ikbt r Yuji j;~ r at5 t 33 .R Y 9 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ,'L Z ~ Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 11 of 38 } build that. Secondly, if you could give me the slide -- maybe the first slide that was there that showed the overall project. Good. That would be fine. You can't see it as well, Commissioner O'Brien, in here, but these streets down here are somewhat similar r*~ to these streets up here in terms of they're a cul-de-sac, they do bend, they do maneuver pretty much the same, and so it's not inconsistent with what we have done in the past and what's existing already there as a part of our development and it's critical "~~ for us wanting to create these pockets of these neighborhoods, you know, to eliminate that cut-through traffic and your statement about 25 miles an hour and maybe your worry about that in terms of the radius in curves and such, if we had a stub street on the other side -- and if you could now go to the subdivision plat, please. If we had a -- if we `~ ~ had a stub street out this side, you would have people coming through here and cutting ~' ~ through and wanting to go out that way and I think it would just exacerbate the problem and be more of a problem for us and that was one of the things that us -- all of us as designers, owner, rep, and planners were trying to do is to mitigate that. So, I did want to respond to that question. O'Brien: Well taken and I -- I also -- the input I got back from Sergeant Hosford was that they have more problems when streets are straight than they do with curbed streets and also they have had absolutely minimal amount of calls to areas -- to this particular area since they have been in there. So, it's been a positive experience so far, so -- but I just had to express my concerns about -- about those things to make sure that you ~^ understand that there is a concem there and that, you know, make sure that what we do here in the future is conducive to this kind of community of the elderly, whose hearing is a little gone and sometimes, you know, you can't see as well and so people walking up the street, they just have my concem. jy: Dalrymple: Well, it's 55 and greater and I'm 55, so I can still hear. But I know exactly what you mean. It starts to go way. Now, if there was a concem in relationship to ~.-; landscape design on any of these curves -- I mean we were opened to mitigating those issues in terms of landscape design, if that's something that is important to the Commissioners. So, you know, with that, if there are any other questions, I would be happy to answer them. O'Brien: I have none. Thank you. Dalrymple: Great. Thank you Rohm: Thank you. Appreciate that. Okay. At this time we are ready to take public testimony and -- but there has not been anyone that has signed up to testify to this application, but the floor is open, so if there is someone that would like to come forward and testify, now is that time. Malcolm Radisson: My name is Malcolm Radisson. I'm a resident of Meadowlake Village. I have been for about two and a half years. Rohm: Could give us a specific address, please. k ~ tr ' " ~ A of ~~ ~: ,~ . j}F r ) u .'~ r Ir~i~;~>J i' ~ti h \ d •~f f .r aya si; ,.. ~ ~±; } k ~ Fu , " f r r ~ ~ ~~c,x SCE iC:~ 3> e , "3 y ~Y l r1t,~1 f..f ,r ~ 1 ,, ,. r '4~ x ,~~ ~~ ,- c -~ ~ . ~ #~~~ p ~` + `~ " s1K ~ a S ~?~°~ ` ;f ',r v fi St ~~ ~ ~~ ' ~a ~ ~ti;~ ~ ~j6 ~ - F -. ~~ d. , ~f a _ _ D F ~` }fkfiv J-~ k ~ ~ ;~ ra tL ,71~ _~;' ~ _ " `s ~ ~ 'JYr-, v ,~ p ~ ~! ~ r ~ c ~ 5 ~ ;y~ S ~ ~?z~ t - ~~3 ~ ~ ~ ; ~. ~ ~ ~Cir~~` f~i,x; ~~6 ~ t r ~ ~ ~ ~'-, _ ~ ~) F}iin~ ~ 4~ ~ Ks _ S ~ ~5-- S ~ ~r~ FS ~' F y ~ f ,r I i ~. i ian Plannin & Zonin end M 9 g ~.. May 17, 2007 .' e; Page 12 of 38 ~., •~ Radisson: 578 South Wamer Lane. ~;_ I'~~ Rohm: Thank you, sir. I~?F Radisson: Thank you. I would just like to ask the young lady here, Ms. Johnson, if Louise will have an exit to Franklin from --from the east end of that property. Rohm: What you do is you ask the question of the Commission and then -- Radisson: I'm sorry. Excuse me, please. Rohm: -- once all public testimony has been received, then, the applicant will come ~;;;:,; back and respond to the questions from there. y. Radisson: I apologize. Rohm: No. That's fine. Just -- ;. Radisson: I would just like to know if there will be an exit to Franklin from the east end ~` '' of Louise Street. ~,, , Rohm: Okay. We will get you an answer. Radisson: Okay. Thank you. Rohm: Okay. Is there anyone else that would like to testify to this application? Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward and offer a response? ~~~ Johnson: Amanda, could you, please, go to the first slide that I provided to you? Unfortunately, it doesn't show up very well, but this is -- here is Louise. There is a proposed roundabout right here that does -- will, in fact, connect up to Franklin Road. ,, .~ Rohm: Thank you. Okay. Does the Commission have any questions of either the applicant or staff? x`~~ inter. In the ro osed la out with -- Siddoway: I do, Mr. Chairman. Looking for a po p p Y '~'' ~ thank you -- with the cul-de-sacs, I'm wondering if someone lives in this area, but you got the services and commercial uses just north of them along Fairview, is there any way for those folks to access the services that are up here that they may want to get to ound. ut and ar bein forced o without g ~~, ,,; ;. ~= - Johnson: Commissioner Siddoway, by car, no, they would have to travel down Nissler ~~•; .~. ~~ ~ Court and around. As I stated earlier, we are really trying to push pedestrian _`a connectivity, so if they wanted to walk, they could come up this way or this way and also remember that at some point these will also be commercial, too, so -- 2 ~< 4 ~ ~. ~~ "' :: ,.. ~ ~ ~~. ~J~' Y L ~Y, F Y ( f~~ ) `C~ _ ~ K~ xi i., '' y ~y~ 7-, r} ~ sss ~~~--~~..iat:~ ~ Yy '5~~~. ,. t3 ,,~ .F x ~ 4 .~~ ' ' ig # i~,j~~~ Y 11 ~ s ~.H ~BT F j (,:1~. . .. ,a . f 4' ~.: ~ y~ 5 i F its - 4' l~? » ~ 4 1 r G ~}cu ~ . f ~ f ,b, ra: ~ ,.~> A ~~ ~lJ~ ~[ ` ~ Vj ~`~ C ~ fi~~ .! . 2R -. ~.~. - h ~ H~w tL t l^~ ~~.~• ~ ~ yy ~ f-:' ~l J rPai a i ~>n~z^ / 1 F ~{ C i r ~ .. t ',~ ..'. ,~G 3 £~ - ~ L ~ ! r J!. 1 y ~ 1 - j~` K ~ 'Rlr ~ ~,.- s ,~ F 4 s~,; , . ~ ~?~~ [~ r ~ it .~ r`. ~n~ j ny ~ . i~'~~Fy~~ r.x t t h ~€ µ~ ~h U ~9~ ~ _ ~ _ '. ~. Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 13 of 38 ,~, ~, s , i Siddoway: Both this area will have amicro-path and this will be a continuous micro- path as well? Johnson: Correct. Siddoway: Okay. You mentioned proposing a future CUP for the two platted commercial lots. Johnson: Uh-huh. Siddoway: And as part of that did I understand correctly that they would not take access directly off of Touchmark Way through here, they would be off of this road? Johnson: Nissler. Correct. Yes, you are correct, Chairman -- or, excuse me, Commissioner Siddoway. We would actually like to put that as a condition on this plat, as well as, you know, the CUP as it came forward. ]4, Siddoway: And, then, one follow-up question for staff. The -- is it -- through the current UDC is it not -- not possible to do these streets as private streets, as the ones south of here have been done? Hess: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, Commissioner Siddoway, I'll move back to the zoning slide here. As you can see and as the gentleman before stated, this area here -- all of the homes are not on individual lots. It was never platted. So, it's F ~=. considered amulti-family development and in multi-family developments private streets ~- are allowed. However, you know, this is a platted formal subdivision and they aren't 2~,: allowed to access single family homes. Siddoway: Thank you. Okay. I think that's all for my questions. Thanks. Rohm: Okay. Thank you very much. I think at this time it would probably be ;~:; appropriate to close the Public Hearing, unless there is other questions of other Commissioners. Could I get a motion? ~; Siddoway: Mr. Chairman, did the applicant address the rear setbacks? I don't remember if that was an issue. I know that the staff has proposed that they just meet :'` the R-8 standard of 12 feet from the rear property line. It looks like they were proposing . what would be ten feet from the property line, but I just want to make sure -- I'm inclined to go with the 12 feet per the ordinance, but I just hadn't heard that addressed. _,~ '_ Johnson: Chairman Rohm and Commissioner Siddoway, I apologize I guess I didn't ~r.`- ~ bring that up, because we are in agreement with that. We are fine with that condition. ~' Siddoway: Okay. Thank you. x ~,~ a: - ~~,s, [! t r ~a~~ =~ i 3 , ~; ~~ ~ ~~ ~= r ~ ~~ ~'x ~ ~ ~° ~ t t, ~ ~~~ 4. , ~ 3 ., . i ~ hh i 1~~41 '-t~ 'Lt ,'~ ~ r } E ~ + ~ H ~~ ~, S { Y R s ~ :1'+. ~ µe d X } ..~.,_. r 8 s! ~' ~tt 9 Q ~ 2 TW ~ f,{ ~ tip „~ {) } f V r, i ~i ~ i~~ ~~~~ ii ~~k ~ ~ 3 s a ~. e~ ~ hr~ '` a ~ x ~ ~ 3' 1~' ~~~~ ~ w f , Mgr a~'~- k ~y ~ ~ ~ + ,C,; f _ r ~'i P ~ L3~k r it'^'i ~'al ',' ~ ~~ <}:,:. 4k [C ~~y7~ ,T; . ~,.~ ~ 1 :lw ~ a "i r x ~ X °SrT . . y ~ '~ ~_ ~ _ ~ 3 ' C ~ ! ar ,~ ~~~ ~ ~ % ~ µ~ ~ i~J ~ ', - ` F ' "~h s 4~~''11~.i~ i~. i t ~' R 5 4 ~~~ ~ F ,~ ,7 u n } w ~. , ~; ~ z ~^ ~4 ~r4 r M ,y ~Y: i 7+ ~t.r , ~~7 3' ~' }N t~ ~ ~ 1 74 1'3'C' ~ f - ~. F ~ ~~~r ay ~ i ~~F ::i~ . :~ '~~yy ~. Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 14 of 38 Rohm: Oka . An other questions? Y Y Siddoway: One more for staff. The outstanding issue for the Commission as listed is the need to construct the pathway. Has that condition -- oh, wait. Sony. I'm on the wrong one. Never mind. I withdraw my question. Rohm: Okay. All right. At this time could Iget amotion to -- Moe: Mr. Chairman? Rohm: Commissioner Moe. Moe: I make a motion to close the Public Hearing on PP 07-009 and CUP 07-008. Siddoway: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to close the public hearings on PP 07-009 and CUP 07-008. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. ` Rohm: Before we move forward with this, I'd like to open for discussion and start with f_ Commissioner Moe. Do you have any final comments on this application? Moe: Yes and no. In regards to the preliminary plat and the CUP, Idon't -- I don't really €~ ~ have any problems with it. I think it's a great great development out there and they are just tweaking a few things that they are doing, so -- in regards to that, but I do have ~. some questions on the variance in regards to the cul-de-sacs and whatnot -- I guess 'e'~~' would kind of like to know from staff if they had any other conversations with the fire department in regards to the emergency access and whatnot to get to these homes and whatnot, because there is quite a distance there. Hess: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, I did speak specifically with Joe '`~~' Silva regarding this and while he stated that, in general, the applicant's proposal does comply with their standards for emergency access, that he would like to see athrough -- `` or would prefer seeing a through street there for access. He does have concerns right "~~ now of the turning radius. This is very tight here at the emergency access. So, yes, he <~ would prefer to see a through street. r. Rohm: Thank you. Again, because we aren't acting on that variance, it goes to the City Council, the recommendations and whatnot, so I will think that through here. Rohm: Okay. Thank you. Commissioner Newton-Huckabay. Newton-Huckabay: I much prefer the connectivity of the first -- the first concept that came through. I always find -- we went on the public park tour and they took us on the :.~ ;~ ,:~. "F= ., ~ ~ wf ~a~ :a~ ~' F ~ y r i~C 1 ~" ~ 4 Y ~~ ~ ~7~ ~~~~ ..;. ~ ~ w ~ ,~- ~< ~ ~ ~~ " ~ ~ ~. _ r' ~ a ~ i ~ .,, F €s 7 ., ~ ~ of cNn w~: _ ~~ . ~ , r 9t .b ,% 2 ~ ~~[ ls~, ~... ~. ~ ~, ~ ' ~~ ~~ ei ! ~ S . ,~~ `~ f ~ * ~~- a a ~ ~; ~, r n ~ ~~' ~~ ~s 5 _ ~a~~ r N ~`, ~ ~} ~Y ~ ~.~" I R +rf. t ~ , a YI ~~ v„ tl. ~ i. R~ ~ i7 ;. - 'J''. i `~~ ~ .a 3. E r k n,~ ~x.4 r;~4"M '. -:`r. ~ w die t~r - i ?~ ~ 3= , ;,, ~~~~~k ~ - ~ S~ e ]ati.nr~ ~ 5 ~'~ r P,~~ ~131E~J ~ ~ Jg Y ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ :'.,~ d I ~. ~w ~ +~ 3 ~ ' ~~ ~ ~' a , if y !,~ .~ ~~ i ~ y;y E ~k~ ~~ , ~ ,.. ~ ~ ~~r +~_~ f f ti ~~ µk~. i ~z +5r~1~~ )' .~ .~I, i f. _ Ft "~ L n 4, b ~ . ~~ r -,~; ,~ . N ~~u ~)~ ~ s } ~~~t ~1IM"4 1(~. ~~ ~~ 1~ ~ A~ ~ ~s ~f $ ~ 4 ~t ~ ~ _ Ln A>• Air ` 'i - F a UYy+.r 1r .s. 1 F i - ~~~ xs' kt~. Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 15 of 38 C~' J - school bus and kept having to tum around in cul-de-sacs throughout the city in a school '' bus and it was not so easy and a school bus is a little smaller than a fire truck and so I generally am not a real fan of cul-de-sacs and I would rather see a stub street through, as well as the entire design of the Meadowlake Village does not encourage you to go driving through there to go cruising around. It's a very central place when you drive up to that development with the entrance and whatnot, so I don't think other than those predominately who live there and all would be driving around in there and at the end of the day they are roads, not pathways, and so I would think as a resident you would want w; as many ways to get out as you could. I'll give my recommendation to the Council to ~.:; not have cul-de-sacs. And the setbacks I have no real issue with. At 55 I don't think I would want a large yard. That's the end of my comments. <~ ~~~ ~;,~, y .' - ~~'~ P' Rohm: Commissioner Siddoway. Siddoway: Well, I know we don't act formally on the variance, Iwould --Iwould have a tough time finding a reason for hardship for a variance. I have to ask myself if I were acting on the variance is there a hardship that exists that would not allow me to make a connection and I can't find a true hardship case. I do understand perhaps marketing reasons that would be there to -- you know, to want the cul-de-sacs and things like that, but I don't believe in this case there is a -- we have the -- that there will be the ability to make findings for a hardship, from what I see. So, I, too, would agree with Commissioner Newton-Huckabay in that I would support the connectivity and I would like to see anorth-south roadway that connects through on the -- near the east portion of the site. Iwould support for the office commercial areas that it's fine to support the plat and this CUP with going through with the condition for a future CUP on that lot and a condition of this one that it not -- they not take access from Touchmark Way. I do support the rear setbacks proposed by the staff and that is all. Thank you. Rohm: Thank you. Commissioner Siddoway, do you believe that we need the connections both on the east trunk, as well as the west, or just -- Siddoway: I just think there needs to be connectivity. Rohm: One or the other, but one of the cul-de-sacs would be okay without access to one of the arterials? Siddoway: I'm thinking in this area here. y Rohm: Okay. So, on the west end -- the west end use you don't feel that we need to :: ,`, have a connection there as well? Siddoway: That's difficult. I guess that one was 900 -- 950 feet. I just think that I would ~~'~ have a tough time finding support for a variance in general. If there was a different way to lay it out so that the cul-de-sac was not longer than 450 feet -- I don't have particular issue with the cul-de-sac, but if the variance for the cul-de-sac length, I think that there ';~,; is a way to make it work within that current ordinance. d ~. ~ -~ ~~~ -~ . : ,, ~ - ; 99,,,~, _ y~' ~ r^ '~ ; ~ ~ ~ s 7.,: ~~ ~"r ' i ~ , , i A ~~~i'i"wJ ~t: i ~ y~l~ r -v' f- ~- ~ ~ I I;S. 1 ~~ ~ e ~ ~ zr a ~i ',~~t H ~7 ~~ ~,fi $C 3 ~. ,~. ~' 4~ hret~: ~ ~b,r 4 1 y~... ; ; 'a ~ .y ~:. 4 ~+; , . ~~ 1 ~ f F ~~: f ~ Fi ~ ~ ° ~cr ~~ ~ r '~ ` i ,,~~. h xt ~ ~t ~~~ v, ~~ <~' ~q~ ~ ~;~ - :.:i 'i ~ -.., rf ',yy~{ f~~r ~~`s" t ~ ;' t ~: +C~ , A r _ K ., ~~j.x .. ~. 7y}} `-.u ~k~ ~ ~5~: :,!; ?~~9: ~~ Y ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~. ~ $ x~ r i~ ;~ r ~~ r F'tt F r S i ;a n. n .ti~f -. ~ . ~ r _. ' ~, a i S . ,;,, r, d~' ~ a.' ~,~a y $, - 33 ~#f4 'E ~ gy ~~ ~~. t ~ pN ~~ Y N i ~ y.~,r'~Nt~r`'` ~r s. ~~~ ~ ~,r .~ Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 16 of 38 Rohm: And I think the point is is both of them -- or either of them require a variance and ._.y: you would have to put a stub out of each of these to eliminate the need for the various, as I understand it. <,: Hess: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, I can address that for you? Rohm: Would you, please. 3 ;,_ Hess: The way this works is because both are considered cul-de-sac length -- '~~~~~~~ measurement length starts from Touchmark Way here. So, we count here at the beginning point, we follow along the Beal Court and it ends here. The second cul-de- sac also starts from the same place and is measured all the way to the end. However, if Nissler Court was to actually become a through street, our starting point for the cul-de- sac length would actually start here. Rohm: Right. Hess: So, I'm pretty sure that they can meet 450 length with this one. They would not need a variance for this cul-de-sac. Rohm: Good. Thank you for clarifying. I appreciate that. That helps quite a bit. All right. Good. Commissioner O'Brien, do you have some final thoughts? O'Brien: I'm not in favor of a through put on the cul-de-sac, either one of them. If I were to buy a home there, the whole purpose of me going in there would be for privacy and keep out unwanted, unneeded traffic. Okay. That's important me and I would see that would be important to a lot of people that might move in there and being a destination for their future home. Again, my only concems only would be in the safety aspects of that. You add a through put -- open up the cul-de-sac and you're going to get -- you're going to increase those safety concems I mentioned earlier and I just don't think I could approve of that type of a change outside of having it mainly just for fire and police. Rohm: So, basically, you like it the way it is? O'Brien: I do. Rohm: Okay. Thank you. O'Brien: Outside of having staff review the safety aspects of lighting and shrubberies and things like this is on some of the radical curves to make sure that people can see -- people coming out of driveways and an entrance street or walking on the street, et cetera. Rohm: Okay. Thank you. And I guess my final comment on this application is I tend to agree with Commissioner O'Brien. The fact of the matter is there is connectivity through . r . ~~ y~r4 G U ~ . ~ r.4 ' 1. ~ ~"~yy'~., ~' V'~' Y~X ' { ~1 u k ~~ r~f^ '..~;~ t ! 5~`-- x `",art ; e Q}~E~l Jar yj~ M~~~~'~ '4 y ~~ ~ } ;~ .. 4e ~' ~, .,: a t ~_:. ~H 56' !. # J ~ ~~ 1 r,~, nw ~~,, .A r, ~3~ k>~ ~'~ r '~,~. i~ ,y ~, rY~ ,~~). s „~ ~ . ,7~~~ ~ 5 ~P ~ k .~ y:' ~f,L ~y ^S Y~< ~f:4 t ' t ~ ~ x 9 r~ < 4 S i ~ '~^~. p s ` ~~fi 1r•. 'ti iisi ~ r '~. ~« ~'"' ~' ~ h r -hi sr~ i _. ~; _ s; ~ y ,:; s , .. l:C. , e ~, ~ y Gn :. ,/ f~~- t V l~ rf~ Z` Ar ' - -. j .. ~.~ , . .L fRi~;~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~. ,1 ~_' ~IlS.. 1 rf~ a .~ i . a ¢ ~ti .~';~k~'. r~ , _ F Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 17 of 38 ' this subdivision via the currently existing Touchmark Road and the proposed road along the north line of these lots and even though there will be two cul-de-sacs internal to this , `"~~ the general flow of traffic throughout this subdivision has -- is being maintained and I certainly understand where staff is coming from, because that's what we have, we have ordinances to prevent the lack of good traffic flow and I think that this particular T , ~ ~ ,; development maintains that traffic flow, even though it doesn't comply with the UDC and . ~, . so that would be my comments on this. And with that being said, I'm ready to hear a ~~" motion, so -- Siddoway: Mr. Chairman, one follow-up with Amanda real quick. Just like to check the conditions. The conditions of approval are already written for the setback issue; ~ , ~ ,y correct? kj ~ t ~-'. Hess: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, yes, that's correct. ~ k Siddoway: And the -- there is a condition also that requires connectivity? _~ ~ Hess: Correct. That is correct as well. ~ Siddoway: And this -- there is -- there is not one, is there, that addresses a future CUP _ }~ and the issues for the two existing --the two commercial lots? K - ~" - Hess: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, no. No. Right now -- Siddoway: That would need to be added? ;, , Hess: The Commission states that the applicant was to provide concept plans for how ' the commercial office lots were to develop. So, you can add the CUP requirements for F.M, ~`" those lots under the Conditional Use Permit comment. Siddoway: Do you have those lot numbers? Hess: Let me check. °` Hood: And while Amanda is looking for that, if I may, Mr. Chair, Members of the y;~' Commission, always helps staff out if we can have a plat note to that effect. Five years "' from now, maybe two or three years from now when someone goes to pull a building permit on one of the office commercial lots, staff may have turned over and no one z:; remembered that there is a CU requirement. So, if we can get a plat note stating that those lots require a CU and the accessory restrictions that were mentioned earlier, I , think that would sure help keep the record clean that it's -- that they do CUPs and where access should be taken, as well as if you wanted to put it in the CUP as well, I think both places are appropriate in this case. Hess: Okay. Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, those two lot numbers are 1 N and 62 of Block 1. ~:, ,~ ~, ~`~ 3gS ~ 3~ ~ ~ ~ ~'".a ~ ~ ~~~ h~,~~ tt w n tJ! .} Ff kil ~z+r'~#cAr ~~ at~ ~{ ~~1p?`?~,~+' 1 '~} ~~ ~ k I ,~ r ~ ~ 7~ J ~N 2 ~ yy` , a3 .1.: # L '.1 _ li K.SP ~r~ i ~. - ~ 1 } ~ ,~-~~s 3s a~~nr~.~ ', ~' ;; {, ~'3~5 TY'1 ~~'~~~ ~. i.. ~ +~ fi'`1'~'~ ~`t t ~ r e a ~~'' 1. k~~~; ° ~ ~ , :;fir 1 ~~x .~ x?: t :. r _ ~ ?~ ~ ti : fi ; d ~, ~`t ~Y ~~ . ~ . ~ - ry Ctr ?r [. 'fk..Y v ~, ~ :'1 ~+. ,F, K j L f l t( - l ~'~~ ~ "y~y ~5 ~ ~ ~ 4 3 ~+~ ~ ~ f '.:t' ~ . ~' f;.. ' a >~" ~' ~F •1 t ~= F tTi F ti YtNF s , ~ ~ ~P ~' rt.~ y,G ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ' „ F ~~ a~~~ , ~ :~ 3 ~`t :p, ~,~ y s ~ ~i ~~: y t ~ l: 1. ~'.'.. tG - ~ - ~; S 1 ~''}}~~ l7 ~ n~ ~ 1 = ~~<{~~~'~~ J k Y y~ a t~ 1 ~ ~. ~~# . ~, ~ f } '~.r X9.1. r " Myt. ,..~-,;d, F ~ ~s~r~ y.! x ~ k° ;; ~ - as o~4: F h k. k Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 18 of 38 Siddoway: Okay. And the ten foot buffer adjacent to Edgeview Estates is addressed? .- Yes? Hess: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, they have agreed to that. ~:_ Siddoway: Okay. And there is a condition that confirms that requirement? ~ Hess: Yes. That is correct. Siddoway: Okay. Ready to try a motion. Back here. We have closed the hearing. ~. Yes. Okay. Mr. Chairman, after considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I ~; - move to recommend approval to the City Council of file numbers PP 07-009 and CUP 07-008, as presented during the hearing on May 17th, 2007, with the following condition ~, ~ of approval: That a plat note be required that says that Lots 1 and 62 of Block 1, require ~~•" a Conditional Use Permit and that no access for these lots will be taken off of Touchmark Way. End of motion. Newton-Huckabay: Second. Rohm: Okay. Okay. So, basically, you're saying that the staff report recommending denial of the variance is -- :. ~,, ~''`~ ;~ Siddoway: Is part of my motion. Rohm: -- is part of your motion. Siddoway: It's already in the staff report that way. Rohm: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to forward onto City Council ~; ~ recommending approval of PP 07-009 and CUP 07-008. All those in favor say aye. Opposed the sign. The motion passed three to two. MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. TWO NAYS. Item 7: Public Hearing: RZ 07-009 Request for a Rezone of 24.69 acres from I-L to C-G zone for Jabil Southeast by Joint School District No. 2 - 1303 East Central Drive (Portion of Lot 1, Block 1, of the Jabil Subdivision): ~s - Rohm: Okay. Thank you folks for coming in. Okay. At this time I'd like to open the Public Hearing for RZ 07-009 for the sole purpose of continuing this project to the r regularly scheduled meeting of June 7th, 2007. ~:~ Siddoway: So moved. .. Moe: Second. i ~ 7 ..-gv ~ w ~r ~ ~. ,.., ~+. ~~° cy i ~ x ~~- d k ~l, ', ~. k ;~r y'~F. ar ~ ~ i~. ~'*° ~ ~ s~ A ~ ~t q~$~ ~l~l a ~~~ i~~ ~~ i ~ 7 , d ~ ; t } `~ '" ` ~; ~~~• '?p?v'i~'~.C ~~r ~~ '? r ~ 'T° v ~~ r ~.''~ } G 7 ~~,i' r r _ rAt 1f Fi m z~ ;~ ~ ~ R~~,. - ~e K Wn~ ~' ~iz ~, l~ , ~ ~"',~ x :- S ~a ~ tii+~` i n! ~f 4 ;ly, ~ sH. ~~; F y ~ r , V ~ E xz {,1 yg , .i t ~~ y , y . ~e ~ ~ ~ 4 h~ ~.' .. r _~ 3 B - _ ~~?~`'x ~~~3' 4~e t i L : i r ei ~. ~; r j C ~I Y H Y l~ ~ 7'~ ~~ ~ {.y .C ... a14N'< .. .. °, ;>: -~., ~~K* 3 ~:' ~$ ~'.~~;~' • Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 19 of 38 Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to continue Item RZ 07-009 to the regularly scheduled meeting of June 7 2007. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 8: Public Hearing: PFP 07-002 Request for a Combined Preliminary/Final Plat to subdivide Lot 4, Block 1, Devon Park Subdivision No. 2, to create two (2) new lots for Devon Park North by Doug Tamura - 1960 North Lakes Place: Rohm: At this time I'd like to open the Public Hearing on PFP 07-002 related to Devon Park North and begin with the staff report. Hess: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. The application before you is another request for apreliminary/final plat approval. The subject property totals approximately four and a half acres and is located within the Fairview Lakes Devon Park development. Fairview Lakes Devon Park is generally located at the intersection of Fairview Avenue and North Lakes. And that's right here. The applicant is proposing to subdivide Lot 4, Block 1, of Devon Park Subdivision No. 2 into two new lots. And we will jump to the plat there. The new lot sizes total approximately three and a quarter acres and 1.4 acres. The new subdivision is currently zoned -- or the subject subdivision is currently zoned R-15. Primary access to the site, as stated before, is from Fairview Avenue via North Lakes. Secondary access currently provided from East Clarene Street, which is to the east of the subdivision. All accesses are existing and have received prior approval through ACHD. The only issue to mention here is further requirement of the planned development for the subject site, amulti-use pathway was required on this development. On the submitted landscape plan it halfway dead ends approximately 40 feet south of the north property line and the Meridian Parks Department requests that the applicant construct the remaining pathway, which is this portion up here, to terminate at the northwest comer of the site. Otherwise, staff has no concerns with this proposal. Therefore, staff is supportive of Devon Park North Subdivision. That's all staff has, unless the Commission has questions. Rohm: Thank you very much. Any questions of staff? Moe: I have none. Siddoway: Is there anything built on this site right now? Hess: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, actually, I think CZCs have been issued and all the building permits for this site have already been issued to -- this Alzheimer's care unit has already been constructed. This is the living phase -- I think has already been constructed and the only thing that I think is not constructed at this point -- this is just a concrete slab or a pad right now and that is the future congregate ;;~` , " u.. , ~ it 5. i ` F 'fir t n Y ~ 3 r _.: is L 2 ~ ;ti ~-l 4 S ....t ~}C. f~ L~ F '' = r S all ^~ ~ ' ~~ ~':- s~ i . . a > i~ 1 . . ,, r 1 ~k` sc .rk 5s :~. ,~ ~ i `di~~ d ''Y.' ?~y i~ ~. ~ fir, w~,,. i ~ ~ } p~~~ .h /~ =i~.~.. 14 3. Jr , Iv ° r m ~ .r a~ a:' ~~..~. g d~ ;~_. 5 r a ;: N V f )~ ~ ;,~ t • ~9 ~' E,;t,, ;'+~,~ .e~~xY ~t~i "~ ~~,, , ~'~~, a, ~~~ .,. ~Y ~ ,'.;~. ~,1 . ~ k '~~; ~ .2r ' , .~' z; ~ ~~.. '' ~. . }, ~« y4"'- F~;. ~: ~~ ;; ?~~efi: ;;': ~~: ,. ~> ~. ~~n~w. ~~~~~' s:- ~_ ;;,:; ~: ,.~ ~~>~N' `r, =, ; , _.~~_, ~:::.: r; 1.: y~'~~f~YV... ~.. ~ ,.. ~. , ,:. -~~~ Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 20 of 38 care. But that has received a certificate of zoning compliance and is underway as far as construction goes. Siddoway: Thank you. Rohm: Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward, please? Hines: My name is Linda Hines. I live at 4356 North Ninth Ridge, Boise, Idaho. Rohm: Okay. Have you read through the staff report? Hines: Kind of generally. I'm an owner of the property, along with Doug Tamura. We are both partners and owners and he could not make it, so he asked me to step in. Rohm: Basically, then, if -- unless you had some testimony to offer, then, it really would be just a request that you would respond to the staff report as presented and if you're in agreement -- Hines: We are in agreement, yes. Rohm: Okay. There you go. That's what we needed. Thank you. All right. And, again, we do not have anybody that has signed up to testify to this application, but if there is anyone in the audience that would like to step forward and testify now is that time. Moe: Mr. Chairman? Rohm: Commissioner Moe. Moe: I move we close the Public Hearing on PFP 07-002. Siddoway: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on PFP 07-002. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carries. a MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Moe: Mr. Chairman? Rohm: Commissioner Moe. Moe: After considering all staff, applicant, and the public testimony, I move to h recommend approval to City Council of file number PFP 07-002 as presented during the hearing of May 17, 2007. } ~4k J s c, ~~~7 J~~ H @y J F § 5 Ft~! r f ~~~s r ~ ° f:. 4 ~a ~~!~'. i~k ~~ f ~ ' do`r~$ { 5 .y~. ,~ ~ - ~ i ~i ~ _ 1 #F 4 , t ~~ x i~~'~~~` 'tit d ~ ~5~~~~ J ~ ~,' ..G ,gip =sr ` S~A ~ ~ ~~ a` Yr ~'.S` aU5 '~a 1 i_' Y h ~ Y ~ti ~ 4 x -F ~ t 4 y "' _~ y .;y. i ~ a P7ht~ y . }~ ~,~t r ~ ~'++jjK L ~~ ~, ~ t k ~ CCp n ~Fi( y. BI~~Y 1 .. ~ ~~ h, 9h ~.:4f. _ ~T a: X ~ ri~ir ~qr .. .~. '~'. ~ ~, ti ih' B y ~ r~r~.. ~ :L~y f~ ~° ~ a ~ ~ ~ *. ~ I Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 21 of 38 Siddoway: Second. But I need some discussion real quick, just for -- I just want to make sure that the -- that pathway requirement is in the condition of approval. `''' Moe: She said it was in there. Siddoway: I'm just making sure. It was listed as an outstanding issue. I just wanted to make sure that it was in there and didn't need to be added. ~~ Moe: My motion was that that was in the report. Siddoway: Okay. My second stands. ~~~ Rohm: Okay. It's been moved and seconded that we forward onto City Council recommending approval PFP 07-002, to include all staff report. All those in favor say f;: aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 9: Public Hearing: I~Z 07-007 Request for a Rezone of 0.19 of an acre from n . ` an I-L to an O-T zone for the property located at 305 W. Broadway ~;s Avenue for Vanbragt Property by Maria Vanbragt - 305 W. Broadway ; Avenue: ; Rohm: Thanks for coming in. At this time I'd like to open the Public Hearing on RZ 07- ,; 007 related to the Vanbragt project and begin with the staff report. - Wafters: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. The application ~; before you is a rezone for the property located at 305 West Broadway Avenue. The ~~~~` light industrial, to the OT, Old uested this property be rezoned from I-L t has re li , q can app Town zoning district. The subject property is generally located on the southwest comer of West Broadway Avenue and Northwest 3rd Street there. The site contains an existing single family home. To the east, west, and south of the property are single ;;_~; family homes zoned I-L. To the north and northeast are single family homes and an apartment complex zoned R-15. This is the photos of the site. This property and other "' neighboring properties to the east and west were originally developed as residential ~~~ but were rezoned at some point supposedly for industrial development that properties a :, , never occurred. Currently the use of the property as a residence is considered a ~ .< .:; nonconforming use and may not be enlarged except through conditional use approva . i s The applicant would like to rezone the property, so that the existing residence is a -' I conforming use in the zone, so that they can enlarge the existing house and improve ~~ ~ _~ ~ the property. Staff is recommending approval of the requested rezone from I-L to OT as ~~ ~ stated in the staff report. That's all staff has, unless the Commission has questions. 1 ~1I ^'~``' Rohm: Thank you very much. Any questions of staff? ~. ~: ~. ~~~ - „: ewton-Huckabay: I have none. ,~: '1 ~ T' ~q T ~ Y~~ 1~ c y K 1. u: ~nr,. ? ~ ,r k. 5 t t -. r J i h T3? `~ ~Y 4 t L . F s ~~ +44 V ' ~ ti',~ +,rV I ,~4 J v A. > 1; } may: .] ~^ S µ t ~ l ~~ S~ r , 1 Y: 1 4. } 'td i ~L ] ~ 7 ~C S ~, Z dC~G b ftl~:. y. E F, , ~K G!`A d.~ ~ K p y ~v, ~{ i ~1!~.~ , a~, } ~.4~ :> k 1cYr ''t~ S , ? {7 ? rl y< ~ f fti.y ~~ F ri~ ~ _ rfi~;~, R'~ f ,rr , ~. ,. ~F;, ~ ~ p ~ ~r , 7 N .e7 r ~~ ~~: Y ~~~ JI4 15.? ~ M 1. Y s .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~,+,3~5~ t i t ~, #33 ~y'rj~ n F ~x btr ~-r. ` ,.y? ~' r ~ I 1" S~.fut '~Cn ,~ t iI ~.T fYT ~ ~, { r ~N$4-~ $ 1 < ~yy ~: ~ } ~ ~ y F f, J ~~~ ;~~ ~. , iY;~Y~. 1 _~ ~: ~~,- r;. j ~,`;I -~;rl ;4wt~ _: .a.,, Meridian Planning 8 Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 22 of 38 Rohm: Okay. Good. Would the applicant like to come forward, please. Vanbragt: Good evening. My name is Maria Vanbragt and I'm the owner-occupant of 305 West Broadway and like I agree with the staff report. We just want to improve our property. Rohm: Okay. Thank you very much. Again, there is nobody that has signed up to testify to this application, but if there is anyone that would like to come forward, now is that time. Okay. Seeing none -- Newton-Huckabay: Mr. Chair? Rohm: Commissioner Newton-Huckabay. Newton-Huckabay: I recommend we close the Public Hearing on RZ 07-007. Moe: Second. Siddoway: Second. Rohm: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on RZ 07- 007. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Newton-Huckabay: And Mr. Chair? Rohm: Commissioner Newton-Huckabay. ;_*~; Newton-Huckabay: I move to recommend approval to the City Council of file number RZ 07-007 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 17th, 2007, with no changes. Siddoway: Second. ~;;~. y Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to forward onto City Council recommending approval of RZ 07-007 to include the staff report with no changes. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. Thank you for coming in. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 10: Public Hearing: AZ 07-006 Request for Annexation and Zoning of 94.69 acres from RUT to a C-G zone for Pinebridge by Stanley Consultants - south of E. Fairview Avenue, east of N. Locust Grove Road and west of N. Eagle Road: r `~' ~' Y ' fir;. 1' 1 ~ ""d , ~~ ~~?- [~ , ~ R ~,-~ ~ ~F S +a ~ +^ '~ k ~ t~ ~ ~ ~ rrayy i r~ ~~ q~~ t~ ' ~ 7 Yyw ~ fr: e ¢a~3'~.? f- -C: { " ~ l ~: t A ~ y . F ~ r tF a R ~ ~~. 1 ~ ~',~ d2't t ~, <_ ~ s~i. i~ - '~ ~~1,. ~. v,S~ .a, ~.~~` c . ~ t . §~ ~t '" • ~~ i 3ry}~.ly }y'tb ,}y fi ~ r tt ' ~.: T ,~ ~ ~ M ) ~ ~ i7' ! ~1 `~ ~ ~~ ~~~1~ 3r::i. i' i1` E ~~~ nr~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . "i 'P G ~ ~: ~ ~rSr NH N I ~ `' .. ~~~ f ~_ ~' ~r ~~: a ti_ i y> ~_.~r,.; ~; :~ a :~ .. ,,_ r r, :, Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 23 of 38 Item 11: Public Hearing: RZ 07-010 Request for a Rezone of 75.67 acres from I-L and L-O zones to a C-G zone for Pinebridge by Stanley Consultants - south of E. Fairview Avenue, east of N. Locust Grove Road and west of N. Eagle Road: Item 12: Public Hearing: PP 07-008 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 61 building lots and 21 common lots on 170 +/- acres in a proposed C-G zone for Pinebridge by Stanley Consultants -south of E. Fairview Avenue, east of N. Locust Grove Road and west of N. Eagle Road: Rohm: Okay. At this time I'd like to open the public hearings of AZ 07-006, RZ 07-010 and PP 07-008 for the sole purpose of continuing all three of these items to the regularly scheduled meeting of June 21st, 2007. Moe: So moved. Siddoway: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to continue Item AZ 07-006, RZ 07-010, PP 07- 008 to the regularly scheduled meeting of June 21st, 2007. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 13: Public Hearing: AZ 07-008 Request for Annexation and zoning of 3.32 acres from R1 to C-G zone for Zamzow's Overland by JR LLC - 3620 and 3650 East Overland Road: Rohm: At this time I'd like to open the Public Hearing on AZ 07-008 related to the Zamzow's Overland project and begin with the staff report. Wafters: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. The application before you is an annexation and zoning request for the property located on the northwest comer of East Overland Road and South Jade Avenue. The site consists of three platted lots in Jewel Subdivision and there are currently some existing homes and outbuildings on the property. To the north and east are existing residential properties in Jewel Subdivision zoned R-1 in Ada County. To the west is vacant property, zoned C- G. And to the south are commercial properties in Silverstone Business Campus, zoned C-G. The property is currently zoned R-1 in Ada County and the applicant is requesting to annex and zone the 3.32 acre parcel, that includes the right of way to the center line of Overland and Jade. And they are requesting a C-G zoning district. The Comp Plan future land use map designation for this property is low density residential, not commercial. However, the land areas as shown on the map are only conceptual. Staff believes that a map amendment is not necessary and that the requested C-G zone and commercial use of this property would be more appropriate than a residential designation for the following reasons: The properties directly adjacent to the site on the W t ~k lu1 ~rv t h ~' w_ ~S~ .t t `•~ ~: ,~~._ „~ yrs I pF o- ',t; it ~~; a a ! ~~ f _ , _ ~ ,u ~ +E~t i, ~' t .:_' . kl 4l ~~ " 7 y,. ~ ,~ ~ t' ~~r `'* v~ }~r 1. ~t~. ,'f; ~' ~~ ~ ~. t ~a.,e s" a N „~~~ :~ +..~.....k ~... ~ir. ~~. ~ h ?v ~` ~; Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 24 of 38 ~`'`~ west and south are zoned C-G and designated as commercial on the future land use map. The site is located on the comer of Overland Road and Jade Avenue, which provides a good location for commercial property and an access point that is not on an arterial street. A large portion of the homeowners within Jewel Subdivision have been '~ pursuing the sale and commercial redevelopment of their properties. And the proximity ~` ~ of this property to a major intersection, Eagle and Overland, with heavy traffic flows and a large portion of this property and surrounding properties to the north, northwest, and ~~ ~ ~.w~ northeast lie within the one hundred year and five hundred year flood plane and the flood way of the Five Mile Creek, making residences an unappealing use. As you see here the blue areas here are the flood plane. However, because there are existing ,:t~ ~;'- residences to the north and east of this site and because the future land use map does ~;, - designate this property as low density residential use, staff recommends that the Commission rely on any comments received from neighbors regarding the appropriateness of zoning this property commercially for retail stores. Here is an aerial view of the property. This is the site photos, just looking right at the intersection there. ~~:;~~ This is Jade. This is Overland. The applicant has submitted a concept plan for this site. ~' The site is required to comply with design standards because of the property's location ~;` adjacent to an entryway corridor. The applicant has submitted a design review a': application as required with the subject annexation application. Staff is requesting that the applicant provide an eight foot wide internal pedestrian pathway to the main building <. entrances from Overland Road, right along here, and to the west property boundary. Other than this change, the site complies with the required design standards. The '~ concept plan shows one building consisting of 13,334 square feet for the Zamzow's retail store and 5,152 square feet for tenant retail shops and they are located here on the west end, for a total of 18,486 square feet. The proposed retail use of the property is permitted in the C-G zone. Certificate of zoning compliance approval is required prior to issuance of a building permit for this site. The detailed site plan and elevations submitted with the certificate of zoning compliance application must substantially ~`' ~ comply with those approved with the subject application and with the provisions of the development agreement. The concept plan shows access here to west -- or, excuse ~~` me, South Jade. There is no direct access to Overland Road. And a driveway is shown r~' to the west property for future connection to the planned extension of Silverstone Way. ~' Off street parking is shown on the plan here on the site. The proposed elevations for the building. The building will primarily be constructed of three different colors of basolite CMU and concrete block, with corrugated metal accents. Staff was concerned about the appearance of a loading area on the east end of the building here where it's ~, with only a six foot tall wall for screening. The applicant did visible from Overland Road , submit a conceptual view of the east end of the building showing how it will look when it's landscaped. Staff is satisfied with the proposed landscaping and screening on that end of the building. No landscaping improvements are required at this time, but a 35 foot buffer will be required along Overland Road, and entryway corridor, and a ten foot E `', wide buffer will be required along Jade on development of the property. Staff is ' requesting that a development agreement be required for this property to insure that the properly develops in a fashion that is consistent with design standards and ~~: Comprehensive Plan and is not negatively impacting here by the property. Staff is -;: recommending approval of the annexation and zoning request, with the development -v ~u ~ Y ~f 1 ~5~ 1b%?~ Rn a ~ ~ a+i q C^Y Y y t ~~ L ~ I ~J h ~' ~ + ~5 ~nx,a ~~ ;~ ~ r . , T ` t~ ~ ~ ~ + . x, d '= r ~ ,k ' ,~ ~ ~ ~ y of ~~I~ ~~ ~g ~ a - - w:,' r. ;t Y '. 1 ~~ il ~ ..n. ~ 3~_ V fl r. 1 ,. 1 ~ ` ~~ ~~ t j y4~y, J 3~ry{ ,, ~ x• Y \7. 1 b& ~.~ iv 7 -: f~~ ~F'I -_~ 4 r ~~r'~'- v U~k~ ':~y dgd M M1h' k ' 1 1 ~~zb~ kA ik t S~ '~ ' '' ~~ .~, n ~. , r "e H/, e,. ~.~ ,~ L il ~::,"_ fi;,~~X Y_ a .. tr~ ~~~ f t~ Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 25 of 38 agreement provisions noted in the staff report. That's all staff has, unless the Commission has questions. Rohm: Thank you very much. That was a good report. Any questions of staff'? Siddoway: Mr. Chairman, Sonya, the development agreement requirements that you just described are already written into a condition of the staff report? Wafters: Chairman Rohm, Commissioner Siddoway, Commissioners, yes, they are. Siddoway: Okay. And there is no public access on the south elevations facing Overland? Wafters: That is correct. There is no direct access to Overland. Siddoway: Okay. That's all I have at this time. Rohm: Any other questions of staff? O'Brien: I have a question for -- I forget your first name. Wafters: Sonya. O'Brien: Anyway, comparing to the Zamzow's off of Main Street, I guess, and the opened area that -- Watertower Lane, I guess it is -- so, you can see all the access points there to the backyard -- the yard area of Zamzow's where they load rock and gravel and bark and all that kind of thing, so is this the concem we have on Overland Road here where that would be exposed to Overland or be able to be seen from Overland? Is that -- Wafters: Chairman Rohm, Commissioner O'Brien, Commissioners, I think the police department's primary concem was being able to see the entrances of the businesses from Overland. O'Brien: So, it's not a concem of having that visible, as much as the entrances are? Is that what I'm hearing? The entrances from the east and west side. Is that what needs to be visible? Wafters: The entrances are on the north side. O'Brien: Oh. Okay. Okay. I was confused on that. Okay. That's fine. Thank you. Rohm: Any other questions of staff? Would the applicant like to come forward, please. Eisenbarth: My name is Darin Eisenbarth and I reside at 307 Winter Boulevard, Nampa, Idaho. 83651. I am the president of Zamzows. This development is very ~~ ,. ~ ; i~ n ~itTH'~'1 4k ~.r a _ ~t l _ ~ 4 ` 'S 4J~ ,.. 1r.4. 4 ~~/ ~~ lF ~T~ C ? 7.: i }~> t d1 r e r"~; F x 'ti7r.~ ii ~1'~: 3~ ",, + y ~ nr Y~ $ h =~G z'.k-r^`` 7 f. 4m~ `; z ~ ~~ k f ~4#~ ITCH .y 9y}}} i m ~S ~~ } , ~ °jp ~f . A.. fi. r '~ t~.3 a ~t fez YsT ~ t~ ~ ~ ~ i. r ,. ~ x ~> ~ air ~ ~ a ~ _ ~ Y y*..~ 6 ~'.~ Y fH d f: t „ -.~ U ~~.1 n.{~4 t 1 k ~de~~r(,~ y.,~ Tif T if i' ~.yt 't '~'! ~ ~ f . e ~ #3' , ~. ~~ f~~. . 3 -7 . & .. '~ ':: ~R<~ E~ ~ 1. . t#3 ,+.'Fiv ~~ ~~~ L ,. t :' -, 9' i .4 ~ ~, > ~: ~~,-- ~~ ~; Meridian Planning & Zoning '~` May 17, 2007 Page 26 of 38 fi,~ similar to our development of a store that we just opened in November in Nampa and it a. £``~~ was well received there. We originally met with all of the neighbors and it was kind of surprising to us that they were actually very thrilled to have us in there, shaking our ~€ :-~ hands and, you know, welcoming us in and we think it will fit very well. The $,~ development of Silverstone that we are hoping will happen very soon, I think will alleviate a lot of the concerns from the police department about visibility, because that `~,, will be a fairly busy street and that will be a large entrance point to our store. The ~;::; reason that we have located it this way is, one, is we feel that when you pull off of Overland with the building located the way it is it kind of -- it shields you a little bit from because that's a very very busy street on the other side. It gives you a little the traffic , sense of peace when you're on the backside like that. It also is the best use of the ~ property, because of the flood plane that is in the back and, you know, we didn't feel ~_. , "` that it was going to be the best use of the property to construct a building in the back §~ and have to go through and alter the creek or do anything there. So, the building itself °"` has a silo on the front of it and, you know, we have been a member of the Meridian Community since the early '40s when we bought the feed mill over here and this will be our 10th store, probably employ about 17 to 24 people. So, if there any other ~ :~; questions? €` Rohm: Good. Thank you. I'll tell you, it looks great. ~; ,_ ~~ ;fit Eisenbarth: Thank you. Yeah. We are proud of it. ~' `~ Siddoway: One question. The site plan as you proposed it does not require any ;' ~ ~ modification of the flood way it's just not -- Eisenbarth: It does not. Siddoway: Part of your parking is in the flood plane; is that correct? Eisenbarth: It is. And it's also in the flood way. We are in the process of doing a hydrology study for that and we don't think there is any issues, but we went ahead to do that anyway, just to make sure and we are meeting with Paul Kunz, who is the engineer that does that. Siddoway: Okay. ;a3~ Rohm: Any other questions of the applicant? Okay. Thank you very much. It looks like everybody that's signed up to testify to this are all kind of part of the same group, but, technically, I have to name off each one individually and give you an opportunity to speak and -- Doug Zamzow. Zamzow: Commissioners, my name is Doug Zamzow. I reside at 415 Schmeizer Lane in Boise, Idaho. 83706. I work with Zamzows to manage the construction and we -- as Darren said, we had a real excellent experience with our very similar project in Nampa ~~ last year and we are looking forward to this one and we are looking forward to adding T ~ , 5 s ~4P~r{` i~~ 3 hh} .R 4 (~" ~ l r fptr,~d „~ S~ ~ :. "~ ~ d ~t x ~ < ~.{ _„-. h~'~ ~1.~.. ,. ;} '~~ a, r ' j ~~ ~ .:~~. ~ ,~a, s `~:~; ~ ~.SF aG~ i.tiv~'Y ~~ 7 '+,~ .f~. ~1 r_`- + 3 ,~, a "' i5r.,.' b. 4 _~p -~ ~'g~~4~~j. s e ~ u sat: ~ F ~x~ . Fj c~~, S qy 3i: ' ~Q s s?~p' b '..~?. nr} ,k; Ks ; . T 7 ($ 'r ~~ A 1 ~$~ f 7 . .fiq_;,.~7r e ~ ~y,.,4 ,',.. :; v,; 14. .r;,.~ T ~yy1~ ML ~ ...: ~ 5.~ . -'fit Ht eti. ~ ~r, ...~.. ty n a .-. r :~.~ ~y'.C~, ~; , ~• y= .~ w.a t:. s; ;~.. ~Sr _ ~.' '~ << Fy:, . 4;;;;+~2~~_+, r, ~. ;: ~. e. .. -;~1'~~ } ^. ~1 }';''i ~; F:: ; t..a. ~, ~... -;;;,` ~:;~. . >~~; ~'.. ter`, ._.~ Meridian Planning 8 Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 27 of 38 more Zamzows presence in the community of Meridian, hopefully through this rezone and annexation process. We have done a lot of groundwork. We spent time on the phone with Sonya and the first planner that was on the job Justin Lucas. We have also spent a little bit of time with Caleb as we go through the design review process in trying to make it an acceptable, pleasant-looking building for the entry corridor of Overland Road. I have also met with Lieutenant John Overton of the Meridian Police Department. There was some concern noted in the staff report about visibility of the entrances to the building from the north side, very limited visibility, and we have agreed -- I have tried to get a hold Lieutenant Overton since, but we have agreed to add security cameras to the front entrances that will be tied into our fully monitored alarm and burglar system that will be in the store. So, I'm hoping that Lieutenant Overton will find that acceptable. I have also met briefly with Anna of the planning department. I met today with two different people at the Nampa and Meridian imgation district. I have also done a preliminary meeting with ACRD to make sure that we will comply with all of their requirements on Overland Road and South Jade Avenue and I briefly with met with Kyle Radek of the City of Meridian regarding the flood way application. I can't remember the name of the form. Flood way application form. And we have engaged Paul Kunz, who is a professional engineer, recognized in flood way and flood plane studies. He will help us through that process, hopefully, when we get the zoning -- certificate of zoning compliance, as well as start on our building permit process. We have engaged CSHQA out of Boise to do the complete design package, civil, architectural, mechanical, electrical and plumbing. Hopefully I -- and landscaping. Hopefully I didn't miss anything there. They were also our architect engineer of record on the Nampa store, so we are trying to keep that conductivity so we end up with another excellent result like the Nampa store. Zamzows has made some changes for the design review process, as I noted earlier, and we have revised some elevations to make the east elevation and the south elevation on the entry corridor more pleasing to the eye as you drive by. We have reviewed the staff report in detail and I can't think of any other real concerns that were in the staff report, other than the police comments about the visibility of the entranceways on the north side of the building. Those are the only comments I have at this point. I'm certainly willing to answer any questions you may have. Rohm: Thank you, Doug. And, again, this is a very nice project. Any questions of Mr. Zamzow? Okay. Thank you. Zamzow: Thank you. Rohm: John Irvine. From the audience he says he has no direct requirement to speak, but is in support of the project. Paul Lawrence. No comment at this time as well. Those are all that have signed up to speak to this application, but if there is anyone else that would like to speak to it, now is that time. Okay. Seeing none e Siddoway: Mr. Chairman, I move we close the Public Hearing on AZ 07-008. Moe: Second. :v, "' . _ . .. ~t~$ Fti t _ ~ ,lrt L ~ ~ k _r 1 ~'AI{7 E3~ryY (' Z #~~ '~ ~~~~~ t ~ k'~ ~ ~ A~-k ,+ h: ~~7 Jr ,: < i ~ ~ ~~tt7+ t' .' _ .-s.. a , n'~rRu _ ~~ X } { { 3 l . y gib. ~ wsa ~ a i ~ ' m'~ t;i k ^ ~ y}y, ter' ' - ~ , S 1 y.~rt l' t'"~ ~Z ''~~ f'T 7 ,P ~ ~~~' f'R' ~ ~~~ S ~"y;,, .. 4 v.`t t ~ ~' y, l k'~~~ ~ A~1a~'S: ~.- ~ 1 1 W 'fi rl~.i~ ur nIW ~ tcKp .. e ~' ° i4''k e. '.~~. ~ s ~ s ;.s; .i.. , r:~,}rE. Y i~ 1,' ~ F 1~ _. t M }t ~ I~ 1 ~ ~'~~' hr { s _~ ~ ~ ,} ~. ~ ~~ '~R^r~~t i4 Ari' ~~ tf " f~. / ~ .~ ti ~ ~~ F~ s f ~Y y ~' , t , ::: jti ff. , ~:: ~: ~~ ~~~ ' t`j, ~; '_'. ~: , >:: ~. ,_ ~: 1~; e Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 28 of 38 • Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on AZ 07-008. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carved. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Rohm: Discussion? Commissioner Newton-Huckabay would you like to add any comments before we -- a motion is made? Newton-Huckabay: No. I have no comments. It's a great project. I'm always glad to see businesses -- home grown businesses, so -- Rohm: Good comment. Thank you. Commissioner Siddoway. Siddoway: Just a clarification from staff. The staff does support the commercial zoning without a Comp Plan amendment, because it's adjacent to areas that are currently shown as their future land use being commercial and you see it as bump of that approved future land use; is that correct? Wafters: Chairman Rohm, Commissioner Siddoway, Commissioners, yes that is correct. Siddoway: Okay. That's all I had. Rohm: Okay. Commissioner O'Brien, any final comments? O'Brien: I have to ditto a couple comments I heard from the Commissioners is I think it's nice to have something finally south of the freeway. We have been waiting a long time to see some growth out there from -- especially from the local boys. Congratulations. Really glad to see you coming down. Rohm: Okay. Commissioner Moe. Moe: The same, like any other Zamzow's I have seen, and I haven't been to Nampa, but very nice -- very nice looking facility. It's going to be -- it will be a good plus out there and I appreciate that. Rohm: Thank you. And I think at this time it would be appropriate to request a motion. Siddoway: Mr. Chairman, after considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony, I move to recommend approval to the City Council of file number AZ 07-008 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 17, 2007, with one modification, that the development agreement include a requirement to add security cameras near the entrance as offered by the applicant tonight. Moe: Second. ~~~ ; ~> ~4 M'p t. ~ y.~ a H l;~ ! r Au-.~ ~+ -, -r , W~h ~ 'i. ~ .'~ ` I..G Y { j i.~t. ~r~ h ti Y l ~Y ~ ~ i~Z; '~. ~~ ~, h ~ { ~,e ~.4~x b~ ~ 'R1 SE +~ ~'. ~. Q ]a) ' ~ ~ E. ' a H T 5.. _ _ ~5.;_ 'r;I,~ .i k ~ ~i ~'~5~5~ 5 ~.,+, F, t r'Tk Sri 4 ¢ t `Ck ~ ~~1'.i GG ~M~ ~ ~ i x5-, q,yh~'~ y~t.rv ~ ~~ x. =:, c '' e~t '" ~~ ~ 5+ ~ . s~ -IC'~~^ ~ . ., a,.~ C ;, y~ lf ~ f !p y ("~ Sw~~ ~ A ' " ~ ~Ym' y ':: ti } 1 :, ~,':~ ~'f Z ~,~ ~"'~ t ~~ F ` » P~~r ~ y i ~~f ~fi a ~~s ~~,.;;~' j, ~ ~~*,~ t I r ~~~~* 5~ ~~ !n - - s :;~l:. pion y,~-r,~: ~~'``~~ r: -^ '4 :r ~ 1. 5 ,:,arc, ~ ~ x } ~ i~ ~ s '..'~i+~•. i ~ ,, ~~ ~' `"' Meridian Planning 8 Zoning .: May 17, 2007 °,:,,.,` ; Page 29 of 38 s ~:,_. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to forward onto City Council recommending jF ~~ approval of AZ 07-008 to include the staff report as modified in the motion. All those in : favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. Thank you folks for coming in. 3`. ~5~~. ' " „~. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. ~ " Item 14: Public Hearing: CUP 07-011 Request for Conditional Use Permit for 12 ~~`' multi-family residential units on one acre in an R-15 zone for Strate Apartments by Gene Strate - 911 East Pine: ~;; Rohm: Okay. At this time I'd like to open the Public Hearing of CUP 07-011 related to T ~`' ``` Strate Apartments for the sole purpose of continuing these items -- this item to the ~~1,;7 regularly scheduled meeting of June 7th, 2007. „,t;;' Rohm: So moved. k ~ Siddoway: Second. °: ~ . ; Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to continue Item CUP 07-011, to the regularly scheduled meeting of June 7th, 2007. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? ~~y.~ ~: ~,~, Motion carried. ~~~~~-~ MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. >; Rohm: Okay. At this time I'd like to take a short break. °-' ~: ~ (Recess.) "'r~~_ Item 15: Public Hearing: ZOA 07-001 Request for a Zoning Ordinance /Unified Development Code (UDC) Text Amendment to modify, clean up and add ~~~ ~: specific sections to the UDC (see application for details of all sections ~~,~~~ proposed for amendments) for Unified Development Code Text °~' Amendment # 2 by the City of Meridian Planning Department: ~, k ~"' Rohm: All right. I'd like to open Public Hearing ZOA 07-001 and begin with the staff ~. ~.r~ report. &`' ` Hood: Thank you, Mr. Chair, Members of the Commission. ZOA 07-001 is the second amendment to the Unified Development Code that we are taking for some additions, subtractions, modifications. As you may recall, September of 2005 that this was adopted, so about a year and a half now -- a little over a year and a half we have had the UDC in effect and for the most part I think it's working pretty well, but we have before you some clean-up items. I'm going to just touch on a couple of them that I think ~ _~ are noteworthy. Some of them are just -- we missed a comma or a letter or forgot to add a -- for instance, in some of the subsections -- I'm not going to touch on those. Again, just some of the major -- I wouldn't even say major. Most of these are pretty 4s. Y ~ `d .; yam.. ,) ~ :}( ~R Sr A4 ~ .1 `t 1 ` ~,. y eyA ~,; S t Y~; 1 9!~s7~. r `t t~ ry Tt ~~ ih +.t +..i~ V~~ ~~I 41.Qi:.: y y ~ 4 z.'s. ~ '~ s .?n? krd ~ .,~y F~~ , x t'} ~! r x ;. ~ ~#. .s -' a i~ ~ ~ : ,. ~~, ~''v~~f ~ ~ p'~ s ?.~. 4~ k.i. yS w~ r 9v ~i ~;;•7 3a -n} w .~ ~ r,. ~ T 8R1~ ~ ~ ~M p 'I' ' ~ fir '"'TT ~ CXnY57 1 ~V ~ ,~ ~Rq „ J. d[~ t s . t5 ~`^~ F J. a,~ ~ ri.ih 4k { ~ ~:: ~`, ,~;< ,;:~. tiar ~ °` , t ~ ~ tf i t tiN. f .~ ~ ll ~, r' ~ Mix.,. Y4 Meridian Planning 8 Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 30 of 38 c minor changes at best. If you look at section line roads, we are adding some of the ~. section line roads down south and to the northwest that weren't listed as section line `~ roads as we have continued south to take in the four square miles or just making sure that we are getting our landscape buffers and things like that on those roads as we There is a bunch of sign code stuff that we are cleaning up, some of approach them . that stuff. Detached accessory buildings, clarifying that they are not allowed in any required street yard, so they will always be behind a structure and screened. Talk h li rt ne w ere y measuring sidewalk -- or setbacks from the back of sidewalk or prope ~ there isn't a sidewalk. Currently it just says from the sidewalk and we are having problems with if there is no sidewalk where do you measure it from. Let's see. We are deleting the standards for fireworks stands. Some of you may be aware we -- the city ~''` adopted a new fireworks ordinance this -- probably a month and a half ago, something like that, so there is -- it's in city code somewhere else, so we are striking everything that talks about what our standards for fireworks stands are. Probably the biggest >e`: ~> change to mention is in 11-3-G3.A-1. We are upping the minimum amount of common ; ; ~ open space required for subdivisions of five acres or more in size. The current . : requirement is five percent. We are proposing to bump that up to ten percent. So, at a minimum all subdivisions greater than five acres will now require ten percent open space. So, that's probably the biggest change mentioned. Hopefully you all had a chance read through this, but, again, there is truly not a lot to it. Some noticing `~ `' re uirements that we are kind of cleanin u there. Ma be one of the other thin s that q g p Y g ~t we were cleaning up -- or adding that's never been codified is a development ``'`` agreement and how you modified a development agreement, so we are putting some .a language in there about modifications to DAs and actually giving them a home and a process, so that's also in there. Common lots -- or, excuse me, common driveways. :' There was nothing in the UDC about how much separation had to be between lots not sharing a common driveway, so we put a standard in there that there has to be at least hi -: a five foot landscape strip separating one driveway from the next. It could be just a one ~~ ~ ~ foot wide common drive -- or landscape strip. O'Brien: Mr. Hood? Hood: Yeah. ~: r--; >, :.., .~ ;,,,x~ y . O'Brien: Is it appropriate for me to -- Hood: Sure. O'Brien: -- ask a question? Because I will forget when you go through all the rest of them. So, this five foot separation between driveways, is that for a single dwelling, duplexes, what? Because like in this Meadowlake thing, they are so close together, five foot would put the driveway in the front door, I'm afraid. Hood: Yeah. Mr. Chairman, Commissioner O'Brien, this particular standard applies to a shared driveway. So, if you have two, three or four units sharing a driveway that goes back and they flag off -- you have those like side loaded garages, typically, those types k I Yf:~~~ c't G ~!C 6 a<"~: f 't ~ ' ` ~ ~ ' X ~ 1 ~ ~ +- I 0 1 ~ ~~Y Sc4.~ is r,,~~l~ E Cc da yq '. 6 "{{i~~j-.. i ~ { - F Y3 . - r 7 `~. t k ';'~r;. ~ A t...~T_., 5 Sf`` Y ? S F~ ~Yf ~~'~ d!'~ r r ~ r.:,~_ nN. ~rj~. h :::5. ~._ l-~~, ~.. ~ ~ 3t ~y7 tf,~:: ~af '' t _. ~., i 1 ~ r f 7 ~.~r.. k } ~ / ~ M1,' :~~1:~. i ~ i f ~~E ~ '~ ~~ RS 1 ,: '~ ~ f f e +,~'r j 4 . ', j ~ ~ ~'r r _F ~ }ir. ~-i~,{fS NYC ~~_ n,1~. 1 a r i, ~ ~~u" . .. 'k:~^ ;iF~.i'e;.; 1~~ ~~ . ~~~~s r: s~ «,,,. '' ~= ~;~~ K~ 2.,' k ~~ ~~ ~: ,:.. k ~.. • Meridian Planning 8 Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 31 of 38 of things, it just says you can't have a fifth unit that's right next to that and not taking access. Having its own driveway, but not using the common driveway that they abut. It at least provides some separation between the two. O'Brien: I'm glad you clarified that. Thank you. Hood: Uh-huh. And, then, the final two things I just want to touch on real quick -- we are adding a requirement that -- I think the postmaster contacted me this past year and wanted to have a requirement that prior to final plat that they get a letter from the postmaster that they are approving the mailbox locations for commercial projects. We are running into some problems with commercial projects. We require it now with residential and they wanted to get that in with commercial as well. And, then, finally, in the planned development ordinance we have added a standard talking about how we are supportive of side entry garages or alley loaded design with planned developments, something we are trying to support. It doesn't say you have to do that, but trying to express our want for innovative design. So, that is, in a nutshell, some of the changes. Now, there are many different sections, but, again, a lot of them are just clean-up things, problems we have noticed over the past year or so and we are taking them to you to see if you have any questions. Just to go back to -- we did send out an a-mail to the City Council sometime ago and I believe most all of you were probably copied on that, too. Let me give you a brief presentation on this. I think at our last joint meeting this is that same application, so we finally got them all compiled, yeah, and so having that, since then, it's essentially that same document from that time. O'Brien: Mr. Chairman, I have a question for staff. Rohm: Absolutely. O'Brien: Okay. So, when I was reading through here, you mentioned several times on the notification process of people living within a hundred, 300 to a thousand feet, depending upon what the notification was about, whether it be housing or light industrial or heavy industrial, what determines that? How was that determined to -- in footage for notification of people within that circle? Hood: Mr. Chair, Commissioner O'Brien, our noticing is done from all points of exterior boundary of a property. So, you, essentially, take whatever the subject site is and you would go -- in most instances it's 300 feet. O'Brien: But what determined that? I mean how did you come up with that number? Hood: Boy, that's been something that's been around for a long time. I'm not sure if there is something in state code that actually says 300 feet -- O'Brien: I don't know that. I'm just -- Rohm: I think it is state code. ;~- kt +~; ~~ ~,. ~ , 5 '.' :;}~ C L.'s ... x ~~ ~ ~,' ~ ~c ~ ,~ , - ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ i k y y ~ `. ~~ S ~ .., ?.yn ;,w~;,k t ~ ~ ; n. Y~ ~~^~- z N R, ~~. ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ' ~ ~ r L~,;_ 4 ~'r ~ ,~ ~ -+ i .. ~~h:' i.::. y ~ r'p~~~,~~ 1 , fi z $ Hb ~'k ~r ~j _ ~ { ~ ar ,. .. ,_ ~._ o1P~e':.~ri •-f r~ ~ ~y4 ~~~.-F. ~ 1 i "~ - + .~ «qq : 1 - L~. fx4 ,: ~=~~~' ~ ~~; ~~~- < ~~ ~~::. . ;...: h~' °~, Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 32 of 38 O'Brien: There may be. The concerns I have with that are this: Recently -- and this is in the county out where Ilive -- is that someone bought the property on Lake Hazel that overlooks the valley where those 644 homes were turned down by Hubble -- from Hubble. The person who originally bought that property up there basically wanted it for the gravel. They turned it into a gravel pit -- not a pit, but they scarffed off the top of that plane on the fourth bench and it was in direct site from my property, but the noise was tremendous. And they are further than 1,000 feet away. And the other case in point -- there is another sand and gravel property that they did the same thing for that was also more than 1,000 feet away. So, there is some concerns there that it very much affects people outside of that circle and so I was just curious as to how that process really worked, because it didn't work out there. Hood: Yeah. And Mr. Chair, Commissioner O'Brien, that is one form of notice that we do with projects is to try to hit the people that are in the immediate vicinity that we think are going to be most likely affected by any development there. If you drive by the project, though, they are also required to put up the four-by-four sign. Now, most people are going 50 miles an hour and they don't read that sign, but that's what that sign is for and if you're driving home and you see one of those signs, you should get in the habit of getting out and reading the sign, because that is what -- that's to get the word out that, hey, someone's proposing to do something here, there is a Public Hearing, find out what's going on in your neighborhood. The third form of notice is the newspaper. Now, again, most people don't read the Valley Times, but it is there and it is made available to the public. So, we do the best we can. We can't send out notice to everyone. I mean our fees would go through the roof trying to send letters to everyone for every project. That's why the 300 foot has been adopted by the Council and, yeah, we can get people outside of that that are affected. I mean look at traffic, you're going to have -- you know, traffic's going to be generated and affect people that are downstream. We just can't notify everyone that well. But the other -- the fourth unwritten form of notification is neighborhoods and homeowners associations. They get the word out and most of them now are pretty good about, hey, I got a notice, talking to their neighbors, did you get a notice, do you have any concerns, and knocking on doors and kind of rallying people that way. Now, on the county it's a little bit different. Your neighbors may be five acres away, but through those methods we do the best we can to get the word out if there is a project proposed, so -- and it's just the way things have been done. And I'm not saying that's correct, but that's just the way that we have done them in the past. And just for clarification, we are proposing to change that radius notice in here. One of the sections, I believe, that was changed is the AUPs, which is, essentially, day cares. We are expanding that notice a little bit wider, because we were just noticing them to people directly adjacent to and I think we are going a hundred feet from there. So, at least we have some new standards there. But our general standards for noticing are not changing. Are not proposed to change anyway. O'Brien: Okay. Siddoway: Mr. Chairman? ~C ~ , ~= 4 t 3~'y~. ~~ ~ ...,:F .. I. y S1: { M r~~ ~V'. 5 ,~j t r 'P x ~~3'~ t 'P ~ ~- i, c ,, k ;;, ~ '~~ A - ti ~ 5. ~ . 1 , ~.:p ~ - ~ *1~ ~ i C~ r in 4.. ~1' t ~ r, y L, . : . ~ 1 ty . + ~ tit M ~ ~ ~ ~:+t! ~. •;j ~~ ~ '~'w l; x ~ ~'r - v ara ra„`t.1 ~t ,r t~ z .;~;. - '~~: K r Fr ffi r` ti.~ ~ ~'~ HiYC ~'''~ p ~'~~r ~ ~~`e F ~~~ l ~ H '3 ~' T ~~ t;;,~I ' ~ y a ya Jr. ,~ = f~ ~ 'af~ . `. i Hy.7i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 7't r'.. ~~ ~ Ck t ! '.~!4.. s l ~Cl 1 r, 4 T° ' y E n4 '" t A ~'-! ~' ~ `<~ t ! ~1 h 'T s - Lj „ ~f i- Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 33 of 38 Rohm: Commissioner Siddoway. °' Siddoway: I think it's also worth noting, in answer to your question, that Ithink -- as I read sub item C, that the director has the ability to require notice beyond the 300 or thousand foot, if they see that, you know, the way the radius is working out really isn't hitting some key property owners that are affected. So, there is the ability to -- to do • that, but 300 to a thousand is the typical hard line. .''r7 `` Hood: And just an example to follow up on that, we actually did use that this last week. There was -- someone appealed Anna's determination and the implications of that appeal could have far reaching implications citywide, so we asked the clerk to do a public service announcement and do all the alternative notice as well, because we felt ~~ >' there would be more than 200 people that would be affected by that decision. So, it's not very common, but it's not wholly disregarded. It is code and we do use it ti '~ sometimes, so -- z:~7, ~~ ~ O'Brien: Okay. Just a case in point, is the south Comprehensive Plan is a good thing to look at, because there is a lot of people going to be affected by whatever happens out • there that are a lot more than a quarter mile away or more. Hood: And -- Mr. Chair, Mr. O'Brien, in that case there are more than 200 affected property owners, so we don't send out one mailed notice, the state code allows you, if the mailing just gets too many, that you do these alternative forms. Public service announcements, you post it in the paper in bigger font, I think is what it reads, but, essentially, you get the word out via other means. O'Brien: Okay. Thank you very much. Appreciate you clarifying that. t: ~~~ ~; ~x x y ~:l ~Zr; ~.~ F ~i Siddoway: Mr. Chairman, I have one question, which -- and it's related to the open space. I support the increase from five to ten percent. Caleb, is staff happy with the way the open space is currently defined in terms of usability or, you know, those types of standards? Hood: It is -- Mr. Chair, Commissioner Siddoway, it is pretty clearly defined in code, you know, it needs to be an area substantially open to the sky, it can't be a parking lot, it can't be some of these other common areas. So, I think the definition is fine. Where I find -- personally where I find some gray area in reviewing those is multi-family developments where there are common lots and where you draw a line of what's common and what's someone's backyard, but maybe there is not a property line there. And so kind of those areas where -- where there is not a subdivision is where it gets a little gray to me and usually most of those have --far exceed the requirements, because they include a lot of the setbacks and things like that in their open space calculations. So, for the most part I think, yes, we may revisit it here a little bit and just since we are talking about open space, I am going to send this out to the BCA. I have not received comments and just -- we would like to get the word out, particularly probably on that one t s,y S t}~ .~:t ,. ~?.: ~ ;+~ ~ < •.wr. : t ,;y', - ~ ~ w 1 i :M ~ ~ ~ ~ ,, k a t ~, ~~'- ~ ~4;. .,r .;..;;;~: ~~ ~ ; ~:y r~ ~: , M ~ . '. ; .. '..., Q~'~ L '! . t . ( y 4 ti,~,,.. ~:~ as ~~r', Y ~ k { ~ kp s'0fz ~ iyS:l,• ;~ 4 X '-'- ~±.IY.Jx ll a:a ~i-~'L Cc~"e ~::.3 .,~ ~ • . ~~ f". , , yy ~ } t ' _ ~ ~ 'i~" v ~~ 1 .Y ~ ~, ~ r r . . .._y,., k; 7~ ny~:::~s:,r~ ,~ - ~ ~ t, ~ ~ ~ , ~Y.fy,. N r ~~T 1 J{.i.~Hi' ;~ ;i J ~ ~": :~+~'. ~- ~ ~ ;. ~~{ ~ ~6 it;~c G,:' s' ~': _. f ~~'~ ~- F ,.; 7~ ~~vF :~,, :.. { F: - i ~~y .. ;~ *f~-,, ~,: t, 1 .ak, •' ~:v~~! `I ~;..,,, =<< ~t -h =~~f: Meridian Planning 8~ Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 34 of 38 -- that one change. The other ones I don't think they will be probably too much -- too many comments back, but we will get the development community involved at least before City Council, so -- Rohm: Thank you. At this time could I get a motion to -- we have to close the Public Hearing? I guess we would. Siddoway: We should note for the record that there is no one in the audience to testify. Newton-Huckabay: And nobody's signed up. Rohm: Yeah. There is not anyone in the audience to testify and there was nobody signed up, too, so at this time could I get a motion to close the Public Hearing? Siddoway: Mr. Chairman, I move we close the Public Hearing for ZOA 07-001. Moe: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on ZOA 07-001. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Siddoway: Mr. Chairman? Rohm: Commissioner Siddoway. Siddoway: I move to recommend approval to the City Council of file number ZOA 07- 001, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 17, 2007, with no modifications. Moe: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to forward onto City Council recommending approval of ZOA 07-001. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Rohm: Before we adjourn I believe Caleb had something he wanted to present to us and get some feedback.. So, Caleb, at this time I'll turn it over to you. Hood: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Members of the Commission, I just had a couple of things. It's been brought to my attention by more than one of you that you would like some additional training -- I mentioned I think to most everyone -- maybe I didn't catch k: , ~; ~~5r. t,~,~ , a ~_, <: ~:::' a, ~~F ~;, ~d, p M~'' ~ 9S ~ ~.~k;,. ~~ ti-0f, _ ;.:~. ~ } ~' 9 ~. fir, •i~ ~y='. F~~ -~ lyr{4 .. t2i~~. '.::t,'3~' ,.'3~ ~"~ u~' ''~: .~ . ,., ` i 14Y~~,` l+ ~1 ~.J .. _~~'; c~~..r~ i~~ ~,~.,s L` f ~ 3~ ~ ~=, •~ ,~F ~,a~ ~ J ~~~~` 3z~' s ~~ ~~n°T~ I: ~, w_v ~~ ,~;; ~~; }', ,i :4~` Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 35 of 38 r~ Wendy, but there is some additional pamphlets and ready material and things that you can thumb through and if you're interested in any subscription to one of those let me know. The other training exercise of this -- I talked to Diane Kushlan, she is the foremost expert on training exercises for Planning and Zoning Commissions in the valley and she has a slot open on the 21st of June for some training if you guys would like for Robert's Rules of Order and just how to run a hearing and state law and questions you can ask and questions you can't and when you can have a quorum and when you can't and just kind of running through those things. So, I wanted to see what your calendars looked like for the 21st of June and I'll try to get a scope of what you would like to get out of that. If we should start out with back to square one and make it a refresher for most everyone and just, you know, do what we can within that hour, I think she can pretty much cover the whole range of topics within an hour, starting from just, you know, beginning to the first day commissioner to someone that may have been on the Commission for several years and just needs a refresher, but there is that and she's -- like I said, she has -- if you only have a half hour, she could do an abbreviated version and really get to the nuts and bolts of it, but she said to go back the first half hour would be a good base to build on for that second half hour, so -- Commissioner O'Brien. O'Brien: I would like to be part of that. Hood: Okay. You bet. So, the 21st -- and I guess my question, then, for whoever -- and this would be totally optional, you don't have to make it. I understand you all work and are busy as well. We have a couple of options. We can do something like at 5:30, we can get dinner, maybe start out at 5:30 and do a half hour and take, 15, 20 minutes to get some dinner, do the second half hour session, and, then, go into your 7:00 o'clock. Or if you're just -- you know, time is of the most importance not being here, we could start closer to 6:00 and just work right through. So, kind of -- the ball's kind of in your court there about what you want to do as far as time, but, again, the 21st is the next available slot that she has. And if that doesn't work, we can -- I can look at her calendar some more and we can get something else scheduled. O'Brien: I'd rather do it a night that we don't have a hearing, personally. Newton-Huckabay: I would be for not doing that, actually, myself. Rohm: I'm with -- which might be a first. I'm with Commissioner Newton-Huckabay. Newton-Huckabay: Somebody mark it down. Moe: If she's available the 21st, that would be my -- ~`° Rohm: And as far as splitting it up, I actually like a little bit of a break there, starting at ~~: 5:30, go a half an hour, take 20 minutes for a meal and, then, have another half hour before we start our public hearing, that's great, because it gives me a chance to kind of a - ~~4 ~:41~{i1 ,5 cJ~ > N•~ r 4Y~~ ~:_~.. P ~~ r A f ~ ~ ;~_ b F,- ~ t~~}p< ~ ~.~ h 1 .~~ Y LY~ ~ ~ ~ t`w jCk d ~ ~t~~~ i.~.-~ Y T"I . ,~ Z ;~ ~'y':ir ~' f ~, ~}Y,.~ - C,~~ ,, ~; r ~ n~,~ tr _. _ .5 r~ ~ ~1~_r ;F~- } ,~ ~F4 S - ~ ..t, "y.~. r L 1 ~ S s ;C : * w ~ .^ y 'f i 4 y ~. ~; _{ ~l~.y 1 F9 ~r~_ -.. ~S.'. F s~ ~, & .. l L I i h F y ~~ +~f 4 ~ , ~ ~~ yyy ~.. ail j ~; N~ ~~ ~ R yy \ jt7 S ~ ~. , . ~ (Ar ~ F TI'~~F ~~ ~ 'Watt. .~~' ~r-~ ~aF. ~, Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 '~-=~` Page 36 of 38 `_` ` think about what I have already heard and possibly have question and answer after the fact. Newton-Huckabay: How many agenda items are on the 21st? Hood: I didn't have a draft or Machelle and I -- I'm trying to remember. We continued a fr fairly large one to the 21st tonight, Pinebridge that will take some time. There were I think four, maybe five other items on there, so -- Hill: Three right now. Hood: Three items? Hill: Unless you have applications over there, Cateb. Hood: No. So, it doesn't look too terribly bad, but Pinebridge is a pretty big project, so - r; - Newton-Huckabay: Is it -- from a staff perspective is it coming together pretty well or is it going to be one of those really big projects with about a 40 minute staff report, `: °; because -- do you know what I'm saying? How some -- Hood: Yeah. I don't know what Sonya has got cooked up. I mean there is a lot of details and I hope she gives those to you. I can let you know what we are waiting on ~` ` now is basically ACHD's comments. So, Sonya is pretty much done with her review, r: just waiting to see if there is anything from ACHD that's going to throw any wrenches . into her analysis and her recommendation, so -- Newton-Huckabay: Sometimes there will be those big projects where they will be -- ~r staff will have a list of outstanding issues that take forever to work through. Hood: No, I really don't see that with this -- this project. It was pretty clean when we accepted it in. In the past there wasn't a lot of public opposition either. I don't know that that will be the case this time, but it will take some time, but I don't see it being an all nighter or something where it just drags on and on, so -- and if it starts to, I mean we can sure continue it on. I mean that's at the discretion of -- ~~~ Newton-Huckabay: South Ridge is what comes to mind. :: . Hood: Yeah. I don't anticipate that. rs>: Rohm: Anyway -- Siddoway: I like June 21st with the 5:30 and the dinner. µ~-. 4 ., Rohm: Works for me. .. ~ ;; ~ ~~~: r 1 ~ ~' r SF .~:'t ~ -, 3Y ;:3+~Y . S 4 ~ L 1 . . t t y~ ~4 ~v^t F rr y .~ r h ~ ~ ~,;, ,. ;~;;r. ._ ~t1 Lh ~~~ Vi L. .}.. I ~ J _ ~ I j ] •~. ' 1 ;4 i µ.- ~ ~ i-„ n,,..- M C~ t M F..~C:j~' .1A 1 ~ y =fix ,,-,r ~~ rr r: ~ a r"° ~_ ' ,~, '~ > ~ ~ - ~~ ES ~ ~<'R~. f~ ~ is ~r 5{ ~8~ `~ ~• nT 4 { h~ (~,~' +~ f, '2 ~. J; ,. ° J ~' ?s , s. is Yk~ L. r = ~.. ~Y h h ~y 7 l r 4 n~~t d,~, ~ a k • ~~Ri p R 1 ~ ,F t ~; 1 ~ h t {.~ ~ 4'rt,a f a wr ~ N t ' Meridian Planning 8~ Zoning ;_, May 17, 2007 - Page 37 of 38 ~y~~': Hood: Okay. Dinner -- preferences? We haven't had Goodwood in awhile. It seems to be a staple. Do you guys want to try something different or -- Newton-Huckabay: Yes, I do. Hood: Okay. What? Rohm: Trying something different or -- Hood: Sandwiches or -- ,~,., Rohm: You will figure it out. Hood: Sandwiches or pizza? What -- no pizza. We could probably pick something up ' t know. ',''~~ from -- like an Applebee's or something. I don ;fie Siddoway: Corona Village. >;~°~~~ Hood: Mexican platter. Newton-Huckabay: That wouldn't be so bad, like taco salad type stuff. ~~ ~ ~- e . I er from Corona Villa t Hood: Or do a Mexican att g Rohm: Yeah. Newton-Huckabay: That would be nice. ' ~;j ~ .A,`.~ Rohm: Okay. Can we get a motion to adjoum? '~ Siddoway: So moved. ~~,. Moe: Second. ;~~ Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to adjoum. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? A~ MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:54 P.M. ~ .1~ _ 1~ r ,~.. ~ P-i''~I tS" Y; f ~~Y ~ f ~r ~ a , x ,~$^~xt E ` ~ r ,3, t r t I ~ _ ,~ ~f ~~ ~~ ~ ~+r i ~: t ., i. u~.l ~t~ ~y~ 1 i 3y w ~/ q ~54 .. i.. f^ i. ` S; ~ ~ t~ t ~, k~- S ryt 1 :` t ~' tC a , ~ ~ ~ 3 t ~ ~ ~~ ~, S i ~ ~1 f ~ t ~ t j~ ~ ~ N ,. +t ~ ~~ F~ 4wi * µ ]p ~~~` rid j ~, ~ i \ i ; ~.'J r" , f k rryr ~tX.~C c _ 44 ~ ^3aN f' S .y ~. tE.+,' D9 ~~~~ F ~ ~~ ~(` ~5cf t i '. i. 4 4 _ ~ ~~~~~ ~ „~f„_ . ar ~c z~.~ ~, «,_:' ~ ~k~ ~ r ~..,s J ' ., ~P ~ ~ y ~, ~~~~ 7y~ ~`:w'! i t: ~~•~. 1. .. '~i.' 4~4i (~ '.. 'l: ... n ~~ • Meridian Planning & Zoning May 17, 2007 Page 38 of 38 (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) APPROVED: CHAIR AN MICHAEL E. ROHM A J~! ~/ ~ / ®~ DATE APPROVED ,,~11~""""~11,,, t WILLIAM G. BERG JR., CITY LER .- ~~~s //0,11 U l l l l 10111119`tFi~'~. ~ ul I t . a,-~ ~l rk .r~.S 1 Y A ry~n ~ L .-E'~. ~~ s t `~;o ~' , ~1; } ~ F ~L ~ - `, ~-` 4 ~ d S 1T , _~~_. ~ ~ x, a ~~ ~. ~ S ~ ,,] ~ i (1~'S~'. H .3 ~4 ~ Y'.b , - 4 r~y?'ir~~ lµ ~':,~ i 8~ r~ ~.t a ~~ T -~~'~' a 4•..~. ~. ~~'~ F£c i..r ,... !(1. ,' ~ ~}y~ J}V Sf -~ t ~ ~l~ . f } y h j-~;f~. '. 7 ~,,~ ~ ~, ~ ~~ ~ k5 ~Y. q ~~ ~ . ~ >~ ~~ k~ ' 2a ~ ~ .t: t.-~-.wr t ~- ,{ . ~ ' ~~ ~ ~'' ..- -'. .; ~ EE ~ci I~`w~ s'~ }~ 1 .: e~ ~+ ' r ~~` ~~ aA ~r ~r~. ,. ~ ~~ - r { > Pi ~ i . ~ ~ 5,: :; ~~~..~`.~~... x y ~, r r ~' 7~ h^?~ a .f _?11~... ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ;4 ~~~. t s;i5~ 4'...' -. _~..-. i E ~~,.- r:; .. "' ;~~,~. ,~,~ f :: MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING May 17, 2007 APPLICANT ITEM NO. 3-A REQUEST Approve Minutes of February 8.2007 Planning 8~ Zoning Commission Meeting: AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: COMMENTS ~~ y~~~ IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: _,, Materials presented at publk meetings shall become property of the City of Meddtan. ra ?~9` a ~~ rr ~ ~ .,q,' ~" 4 J'~ ~ J y k t.~' j ~'~r '~" ~ ` #~ 1.` ~~ pQ~ _ F ' ~ { ~ E ~ .1 k. ; Stia. ~.K '~'~rR' ~ r2 1 .. £JQ? - - ~,' ~p;t 6 y~~~'r r-~~ 4~ '~ ~ i " ~ ' err , ~~yil=' _ t ~ 2 ,,. ,~ - ~, r i ~7r Y i ~~L ! xp hl il rr j$ ~.% t ~ y ~iT3'~ -~Yf..~ _L 2 ~ 5 i .. .c..'-,5~. Yd s .~i 14 Z~~ ,. d dd~ ~.t it ~ ~:~. 4 ; (iA4~ ` ~~. .'ii '~i31 '~'' * t ~ ~ ~ ~~~ 3 ?? - .. w,f~u __. 41r',i ~ r «s a ~ a! - ~,~4 a~~: ~, ~ r ! ~+ ~ ~', i " ~ ! , ~ ~ ~ u ~-. ~~~ f~ k ~~:-~ lC~a3~ ~~ - ~ ~ ~ ag ~ ~ ~ ~ ^3 F.y- h "'i `~~f .It .' 1.1! pJ I i~ ~• - y~ Z `~ ~;~ ,.:.. ~~. ~..: s;: _- _; _ , E -_ MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING May 17, 200 APPLICANT ITEM NO. S-B REQUEST Approve Minutes of Aprii T9, 2007 Planning 8~ Zoning Commission Meeting: AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY EIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: ~~' OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials present®d at public meetings shall become property of fhe City of Meridian. ~~ y~i4' r . Ala ~! I ~ } -~ Y ~ _ ~ F +w N ~ , k'N ~\ 5 ~' 1,?~. ~ ~y ~e . - ~ ~ ~ - ~ i A ~ ~~ i ~ ~ ~ s 7 ~~ f ~ Y {' ~~ ~ ~ _~5 na f ~ ~ , ~ 1! S ~~2 ~~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ r ~ f t ~ ~ ~ . r! ~~j ~ j . S ~ t d F ~ ~ys 1 -'~ Y J i`w'N2~ ~i }~ '4 ~/ ~ ~~°tYC ~ .~' '. f ~~ K k'ii"Je-I 4 qN yl ~Jb ~ ''^ ` ~ ~~,~ n a ~ ~ . ~.ar~ig- f~ r a' i J, ~~i ;ir st.. a ~ 3' ~ t' L: A , ,.e:.t' . d ~~ ~ e ~ e d .}pt 'r ~ t~^ ~' ~f . ~ '.~ ~ SE f '. ~ ~Y ~ 4 t". ~ ~• _ - - fin t T.;•2~ _ A~ ~-~' y t ,~ d+rF .x. ~ .. .. t ~ +' - ~ f + t r -v a~ ~ ~ . ~ r~ ~ .. { ~ .,,~~. ~~., ~ - v !~ .~ ,p ' + 4 o- i :; ~ T 'i v r'~ a j ~ • . ~k~ ~i, _ . ~ ~ ~ , i~',,;;.~ ~ !y 4~~ ,fv'ti~i I~ y~ ~.rr kj ~, ~. ~ f~t~. 1 41~ ~ ~!'~~,. W ~` r, . ~~~ r: ?. x; . ~;~ ~~ n ;: ~.~~~. s;, _ v:;,~. See Attached Findings May 14, 2007 CUP 07-006 MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING May 17, 2007 APPLICANT Falash & Ross Construction ITEM NO. 3-C REQUEST Findings of Fact 8~ Conclusions of Law for Approval -Conditional Use Permit for for the operation of an animal care facility in an L-O zone for Liddell Veterinary Clinic - 2300 W. Everest Lane AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: Contacted: Emailed: Materials presented at hone: ~~=~/ / ~ /.~e~" Staff Initials: meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ` `~;~ O : a: 3 i. . $ y ~`Tx.-~ <~ ~~r t ; r 1~ti ~ J~'Y T ... , ~i ~~ ~.]L, 1 '4= { E t ` #S7 tj ~ J:. ~ <~ n r~yk~.~ ~ 1 Y ~ Y ~. ~, ~~ y ~} ,~~f R~'"~'~ad~ ~' [1 .3 ~ Z ~ '' x~4.,:i. _ r ~ i 4 Hr d $F '~ ~~, ° t ~ v~~ ~ vii i4 ' t z Ht ~ , ~? w~ tar ;: - ;' ! R1 SFl ~ - ASS .y ~yhµ. - 6 ~ C 4~~ ~M „ ~ ~ ~ ~ b ~ r ,~ . _ ~ p:3 t ~~ y. ~ ~~ 1~ ;~f ~~:. 7 .f ~ Y r.~~ {~l ~ ~ is 1.-ii~.~ L i4 ~+- f ; ~ a j 4~ G~.r 1 - ~, h ~7 i~ - k,:.:~Ssi f ti~ ~ds t. G 4 _t ~+ ~ G 7 ~~:'" i. ¢¢t tA~ ~i,e1~"" ~ - ' Ark "`k!~ ~ _ ,. _ r '~a. i r '~ T ~ ~3~' ...,' ~~ ~~ ~ tt ~- ? ~ ~ ~.,ta~.. ~D~ ~~f ` ~, r 7t,.. c¢ T'~~~4~3~YA~ ni ~ -; r~ r N GGW r9~ ~ .' CITY OF MERIDIAN ~ ~~~ ~'° ~r r-~ ~'~_ FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS OF ~, _ ~c~,r~~~ ,~. LAW AND ~~,; °" ~' ~' DECISION & ORDER . `~'-~~'` a" ,:`~ ~,,;~.~x ~~ ~;. y In the Matter of the Request for Conditional Use Permit approval for an Animal Care ~~ --'~ s Construction. .4 Facility Use m an L-O (Emoted Office) Zone, by Falash & Ros ~y~`` Case No(s). CUP-07-006 •~~ For the Planning and Zoning Commission Hearing Date of: May 3, 2007 (Findings ~;'' ~ annroved on Mav 17, 2007) ~~: §• ~' °I A. Findings of Fact ~' 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 3, 2007, '~ ~~ ~~, ~ incorporated by reference) µ 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 3, 2007, ~•~ incorporated by reference) ~• ~x ; }, 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 3, '` ~ 2007, incorporated by reference) ~. ~~ <~. "~~` " 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the 1 ~ hearing date of May 3, 2007, incorporated by reference) u. - ~ B. Conclusions of Law ~. , 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use ~' . `~ Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (LC. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted August 6, 2002, Resolution No. 02-382 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § i l-SA. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). CUP-07-006 ®~ ~~ ~' ^ ) . c ~w s ,~ ~y~ ' v r r yu, is ¢ ~i1,1 - - ~ 4 ,,; ~~~tt } w ~. 9~i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x _ `b ~ ttII ~'~ ~ ~. r ~} ' ~-~.~ } ~. ~i J +~- ~ Y ''FRS}~`- ~ - - a ~ ~~ .. ~... .13 •. .~., ~tlj ~ ~ ~ ~a d r' S Z ' ~ E ~ s e ' fib 4 f+ ~ z ~; i k-. n~ - A ~ 'y't;• l ~'~ ~ ~ ~'~' t s ~~ ,,~s:~ , y ~ ~• S.. ~~Qy' [ Y 1 '~ 4 ! t } ~ . ~ 1, v t T d f ~,~;_ ~ si~~ ~~~~ .s~ a t ~ ~ y ' i '~ t i ±`~ T L 5a~ a~ r;: ti; 4~f r ~` - . a 3 r . YA '~-~ q ~ 'r ,~ l~ ~: '~~~ P. ~ ~ ;!._ ' ~i c '' E i h ~ b',w, -~ - ~ ~ ~ l~ _ I .yF~ .N. ~~ ~:k ~1 ~ ? ~ .v". ~ y ' C~; ~y , f .f d ~ ~~: j ?~: wa ~ 4q 1 ~ ~; ~ _ iyrf Y!{Y ;, ~ k1 A 5~~ 8'&n~ ~~, 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. - - 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which ~; ~` shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon ~' ~~'~ the applicant, the Planning Deparhnent, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval, Site Plan, Landscape Plan, _ and Elevations, in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 3, 2007, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the `" applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. ,:, ": __ C. Decision and Order ~~. ` Pursuant to the Planning & Zoning Commission's authority as provided in Meridian City ~' Code § 11-SA and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's Conditional Use Permit request as evidenced by having submitted the Site Plan and Landscape Plan, both dated 3/15/07, and Elevations, dated 3/12/07, is hereby conditionally approved; }., 2. No modifications to the site specific conditions were made at the Planning & Zoning F _~i Commission hearing; and ~,.,,. . ~ ~,-?~ 3. The site specific and standard conditions of approval are as shown in the attached Staff y ~°~ Report for the hearing date of May 3, 2007, incorporated by reference. ~~„~=` D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Eighteen (18) Month Conditional Use Permit Duration ,. Please take notice that the conditional use permit, when granted, shall be valid for a _ _. maximum period of eighteen (18) months unless otherwise approved by the City. ~< During this time, the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the ~~ conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, .= and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or ~ ~ ry; - ~ structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting, the r, ;,. ~~''' final plat must be recorded within this eighteen (18) month period. For projects with ":' .'' multiple phases, the eighteen (18) month deadline shall apply to the first phase. In the event that the development is made in successive contiguous segments or multiple ~~ --- phases, such phases shall be constructed within successive intervals of one (1) year ~' ~.~ from the original date of approval. If the successive phases are not submitted within the CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). CUP-07-006 1rh'~T~~ r _.. fir' .~~'1 k~ )~''~~ .;C. .~ i; ~ q ` , y T. j ~ tt ~ F t ~~ ,~. ~ , '. F~o $ ~ «t M ~ ~ ~ . ti •~ - r,~~a'" g ~ ~~~ ~i~ vo ~ f ~i ~k h ,y._ ~ ~~~: ~ ~t: s t ~ r, ~ ~ ,fit ~ s % C ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~} Q"~ ~~r~fi z ~~~ P~ i ~ r+' 1< fit ~~'` . x ~ is ~.~., 314a~. i t ,I. 1 E:_ ~ p p Cam` S,"'.`, c`am' I ' ; y ,ittt~r z y~ p, d , yam.. t ~= ~' ~ . $ s- x~~ ~,~ v ~r , ~ 3 4 ~ @ r. .~ ~ f ~ 7~ ~ ..it475 ~ 3 ti ~ ~r....,r . ~F y tir`:i= . ~tti. ~ 5 t ;.. u¢ i .2=eF i ~~f 3 ~~~." p r,i `~ N ~3~ ~~b~ k' ~' ~~ ai ' J .:.. t:~: y S": ,, >~;; ~; Y°t, , ~ .~, Nr,= .' ;_ .~ ;: =~, ~;, , ~~~. ;' ,: ~~' ". <,; x ";;:` -, • E. one (1) year interval, the conditional approval of the future phases shall be null and void. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-SB-6.G.1, the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one (1) eighteen (18) month period. Additional time extensions up to eighteen (18) months as determined and approved by the Commission maybe granted. With all extensions, the Director or Commission may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. Notice of Final Action and Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis 1. The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, a denial of a plat or conditional use permit entitles the Owner to request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review maybe filed. 2. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which maybe adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the conditional use permit approval may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. F. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of May 3, 2007. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). CUP-07-006 1 ~{. i ~ ;~ ~ ~ i y~~ -~~ l}Ir, T.. 1y +~ ~,g~. A ~.~,,. ~~f ~~`i~i ~ !'M ~ ~ . ~ ~r ~ ; ~ ~ t ti q ~Y, z ,_ a~- ~?~S ~. ~~ ; i an.:. ~~ ,~4, ~:; , ~, ;t, Z;,~ " t "~~~ ~ ~ a~ ~a ~ ' ~, tl t ~ ~ dy;4 y ~K 4a °` Y~ i~'~:,'t ~ ~ ~ ~~ C ` ~ - ~'f i ~ ti 4 t - ~.+x: ~ .c~ _~~ ;ti_ ~y ra f y / ~~ l ~_. a i~lkr ~+ t ~~ ~ r~~" T y %F~~~. # ~£ " G u j M1'af~: ~ ' F L S~ ~ y ;:5; ~ ~ y 4 '~' ~ ~ ~ .r ~ ~~ 7~~ g_ 'r ' : 1 4 ( ~: . t I ~;-~ `' ,._ ~~,'. „'.'i i ~y,,;{ ,~r~:; By action of the Planning & Zoning Commission at its regular meeting held on the day of _~T~/ , 2007. COMMISSIONER MICHAEL ROHM (Chair) COMMISSIONER DAVID MOE COMMISSIONER WENDY NEWTON-HUCKABAY COMMISSIONER TOM O'BRIEN VOTED VOTED VOTED VOTED ,~G COMMISSIONER STEVE SIDDOWAY VO ED_ ~Z~~ CHA N MIC L ROHM ag6BBlVBYIlIDp/,/ Attest. ,~yi®®a ~'~, - /~dP6 a s~. c~ t ~~ .,~i e Tara Green, Deputy City Clerl~ ~~,~ i J ~ 4 \` // ~ ~ Q~ ~ 4 ~~0 Copy served upon Applicant, Th~~' uur ~ Public Works Department and City ®A®///~'/////1111 Y~1+~~````,4 Attorney. By: ~'l /Y~r 2 ° ~ Dated: ~`~ ' ~2 ~ l City Clerk CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER CASE NO(S). CUP-07-006 J ,~ A °'~ '~ .~~ I f. 1~ f a ~''t ~`i 3s, ~- ~~S ~. ~~Ci,~~ ~'x rs -.FtG ~ V Y ~ ~. S ~~ t 7 ~ rX~~- ~ 4~`~ ~w f y .~ ~. 3 ab j `~, ~~ ~i~i~~A~f;,4 .~I ~ ii ~ ~y ~ ~ it. F v~~3" '~i i ~i~f<j' y KI a 2 ~ii r{aY 1 b t 7- ~. <s~. S{, ~y F ~ 4 _, tS ~ r~, A t° C ~rnx R} ~~G~ ~ tid f R 'L ~ ~ A '~ F. J~ ~~ .. ,~ ~ k. .. di.~3 fi. `s~c ~ _ ~ {Y~f ;' y.. ,~ j., i ~~ .~ i. H i ~ ~ ~ 6 *~'~'; ' y ~ tY"~ -f t b Y [ ~ ~l~~ Q . I , u; . y x. F 'S .` A ~ 'r. ~•~ JJ l C~ Y~~. ttt ''' ~ 'Z.1 ~ ~ ` l~jl` i 1~~. `~y+~ ~~~ i ! ~ ( c M. 7 rC (C it ~ 1 1 ~ .+ ~ - ~~~ ~j"" 4 4 _ _ ~: ~,c, i. `, ~'. `` ~' ~; : _,. ~~• i ~~: . o.., ~', ~, ,, ;f,, ~, ~'~;, s?, . . ~ , :~ ,~ . _~° ~~~ ~ti~. F, CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2007 . +~ , •` i~ STAFF REPORT Hearing Date. May 3, 2007 ~ -• ~ ~:t~,",t~~ j,~41 i TO: Planning & Zoning Commission ,, • `~~, FROM: Sonya Wafters, Associate City Planner , ~r3,w~ry (208) 884-5533 °~' ~' °~ x,~r - . SUBJECT: Liddell Veterinary Clinic ""~~~"~~°"~.'- • CUP-07-006 Conditional Use Permit for the operation of an animal care facility in an L-O zone • DES-07-003 Design Review for structure located adjacent to an entryway corridor 1. SUNIlVIARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST The Applicant, Falash & Ross Construction, is requesting Conditional Use Permit (CUP) approval for the operation of an animal care facility in an L-O (Limited Office) zone. The site consists of 0.70 of an acre and is located at 2250 W. Everest Lane, on the south side of Chinden Boulevard, approximately %z mile west of N. Linder Road. Per UDC 11-ZB-2, animal care facilities require CUP approval in the L-O zone. The veterinary clinic will take up 4,913 square feet of the 6,862 square foot multi-tenant building proposed for this site and will consist of the following rooms: waiting, treatment, surgery, exam, etc, as shown on the floor plan attached in Exhibit A of this staff report. Because the subject property is located adjacent to Chinden Boulevard, an entryway corridor, the site and proposed building are required to comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19C (see Section 10, Analysis of this staff report for more information). The applicant has applied for Design Review approval concurrently with the CUP application; however, the Commission is not required to make a decision on the design review portion, only the CUP. Per UDC 11-SA-2, Design Review is an administrative approval process and does not require Commission action. However, if the Commission has comments related to the design review standards they can be incorporated into the conditions of approval. 2. SUNIlVIARY RECOMMENDATION ~ ~: Staff has provided a detailed analysis of the requested CUP application below. Staff recommends J `~ approval of CUP-07-006 for the Liddell Veterinary Clinic, as presented in the Staff Report for ~_°' ~' the hearing date of May 3, 2007, based on the Findings of Fact as listed in Exhibit C and subject `' ` to the conditions listed in Exhibit B. The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission heard this item on May 3.2007. At the public hearing they moved to approve CUP-07-006. _~;~ a. Summary of Commission Public Hearing: ~r~ i. In favor• Bill Carter (Property Owner) and Mike Falash (Applicant) ii. In opposition: None ;;' iii. Commenting: None iv. Written testimony: None v. Staff presenting application: Sonya Wafters '`''' vi. Other staff commenting on application: None b. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission: Liddell Vet Clinic CUP-07-006 a~:; Page 1 A ~" ~ , J .. ~ ,.ki :,41 ~ f ~ ;•, 6. a`+ .' b rd ~~ ''+ ~. t~ L~ , ~. i`. f4r~'. ~ tip, , t , ~.'r 1 I ~.,, .:t <, n r_ u. . 11 -~ :,~s , ~ ~k 4 ~~~ ~F ~ ~ ~ ° ~r . : €;'{~i ~~y ~ ~~~ 3~,r + Tt~M r!y, : ~ k ~ ' t~~ ~J(5.~~~~ a ~ ~` '' ~' 7 ,_ r ,~+. ' iii ~. ~~ ~ z 2 : ~ ,rte ,. , ., $ ws ~'.. ~ rya ;~" ~ ~~ fe, ~n ~ :~.• ~~~s ~~ ~ ~~ ~. xr ~ ~) i r :. '. ~ ~ ~ i ~C;rr,~: ~ b _ t -. ~ L ~ ` a f A~, ~ ~~; h~ _ x - ;n, ~. +K.f~Y rts¢ f i~~~EEE4 ~ ~~r~ ~ ,x ' \. f?~J : 9' ] ! _` ~ V ~y ! i1 iE 7 ; ~ ~ #~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ..} f' ~; ~ ~ ~ I~; t f i y ~~ ~: ~4. CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2007 i. The 100-feet of right-of--way requested to be preserved for future highway ~~~ widenine by ItTD and additional 30-foot wide landscape buffer required by the C c. Key Council Changes to Commission Recommendation: i. None 3. PROPOSED MOTIONS Approval After considering all Staff, Applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve File Number CUP-07- 006, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of May 3, 2007, with the following modifications to the conditions of approval: (add any proposed modifications). Ifurther move to direct Staff to prepare an appropriate findings document to be considered at the next Planning and Zoning Commission hearing on May 17, 2007. Denial After considering all Staff, Applicant, and public testimony, I move deny File Number CUP-07-006, as presented during the hearing on May 3, 2007, for the following reasons: (you must state specific reasons for denial and what the applicant could do to obtain your approval in the future). I further move to direct Staff to prepare an appropriate findings document to be considered at the next Planning and Zoning Commission hearing on May 17, 2007. Continuance After considering all Staff, Applicant, and public testimony, I move to continue File Number CUP- , 07-006 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (you should state specific reason(s) for continuance) '-~~~ 4. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS a. Site Address/Location: 2250 W. Everest Lane (Parcel No.'s: 83501350030 &83501360040) Lot 3, Block 1, Hastings Subdivision No. 1 and Lot 7, Block 1, Hastings Subdivision No. 2 Northeast 1/ of Section 26, Township 4 North, Range 1 West. b. Owner: Sara Liddell ,~ ;;~ ~~:~ .: ;~. ?~k', 1485 Artesian Road Eagle, ID 83616 c. ApplicantJContact: Mike Falash, Falash & Ross Construction 150 S. Adkins Way, Ste. 140 Meridian, ID 83642 d. Present Zoning: L-O (Limited Office) e. Present Comprehensive Plan Designation: Mixed Use -Community (MU-C) f. Description of Applicant's Request: The Applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit (CUP) approval for the operation of a 4,900 square foot veterinary clinic at 2300 W. Everest Lane. The Liddell Vet Clinic CUP-07-006 Page 2 ~.. ~ ~ , ~. ~~ ~ r, ~~ ri~ F ~i 4 t ~'. t i. !j Y h-7 ,~f .*i A t vey ~ ~~ ~* F ` ~ ~ r [[ Y ~~~ ~ ~ `4 h, ~[~ /~ ~ y' '"~1 '~ ~4@s yi5 Yr.->f~.. r.sr,~.. - ~ ~~~: iti .r' 7e c Y `~ ~ K~ s... a ~ .,`, c r c S r - ~7 ti ~3.~5 ~ ~~~sr3 t S( ; ; 43 i ~ . 33 f tr ' ~."~ sk .C'r ~kk L ~; C~ Y~ ~ x~ i4~ t 9 ~ ~~ f? Y(~.. t t 6 ti :; ~~ ! r ~~ ~ V~ <;~ ~ s ^ { rt ~ ~ ~ . . t~ 'F ~~ 4 f. ~} SL'.~. ~3, R ~ ~yC,.. ; .':nti'3 t ~ 4 t.; ~~ r ~ ~ ~ fr ,~. ~ Ya,Y y~; f `~- r ~~ s~ r ~' " 'x r n ~ ~ t; F ~~/±F ~ , i~'It '#' ~ 4 g i~ r~ ~~: -~ y.,. ~~~~: ,, ~t, ::a '~,: :. ,z'i a~:. ~y:, ;~~~ ,~- i ^~.~C~'~~- d. CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2007 proposed veterinary clinic will include the following rooms: waiting, treatment, surgery, exam, etc. 5. PROCESS FACTS a. The subject application will, in fact, constitute a conditional use as determined by City Ordinance. By reason of the provisions of Idaho Code, Title 67, Chapter 65, and UDC 11-SA-2D, a public hearing is required before the Planning and Zoning Commission on this matter. b. Newspaper notifications published on: April 16, 2007 and Apri130, 2007 c. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on: Apri15, 2007 d. Applicant posted notice on site by: Apri123, 2007 6. LAND USE a. Existing Land Use(s): Vacant b. Description of Character of Surrounding Area: The adjacent lots are zoned L-O and are in the development process. Residential homes in Lochsa Falls Subdivision exist to the south of the site. c. Adjacent Land Use and Zoning 1. North: Vacant property, zoned TN-C 2. East: Vacant property, zoned L-O 3. South: Single-family residences in Lochsa Falls Subdivision, zoned R-4 4. West: Vacant property, zoned L-O d. History of Previous Actions Pertaining to this Site: • This property was annexed (AZ-02-010) into the City with an R-4 zone in 2003. A Development Agreement (DA) was recorded (Instrument # 103012598) for the property at that time. Concurrently, a preliminary plat (PP-02-009) and conditional use permit/planned development (CUP-02-012) were approved for Lochsa Falls Subdivision. A final plat (FP-04-007) for phase 12 of Lochsa Falls Subdivision, in which this property lies, was approved in 2004. An addendum to the DA was also recorded in 2004 (Instrument #104033484). • A detailed conditional use permit (CUP-06-008) was approved in April, 2006 for the proposed office buildings on this site. • The subject property was rezoned (RZ-06-003) from R-4 to L-O in July, 2006. • The subject lots were re-platted through the short plat (SHP-06-001 & SHP-06-002) process as Hastings Subdivision No. 1 & No. 2 in March, 2007. • A Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC-07-059) was approved for this site on April 3, 2007, for a shell and core. e. Existing Constraints and Opportunities 1. Public Works Location of sewer: Existing building already serviced. Location of water: Existing building already serviced. Issues or concerns: None Liddell Vet Clinic CUP-07-006 Page 3 ~.~r~r ~ ^+ ~ ~~a~ ~, y,, , r~~ a ~ '~~:Y.f L~ ~~L E ~ ' } ' }. ';~... T Y ' . E r~_: f {~ f~ ~ +. ~h, ti $ .: ~ `~ L }_i ~3d~'~x' 4 J~V F ~ ~ E9t., r' ~ (.~ `+' ~ ~. k ~ ~~s r zj ~~ ~~`'° r ~ '. y i,~. r t,X. j~ . t ,~ +, ~ ~i~ 1 ` ~' tt an i a, ,~`. 3 ~:5~.. il~~ Hi ' 4r y: ~' f ~: ,,"~, Y ~ ~ i i .. Y y~,~0 ~~ a I+h v, ~ r 'i . rv~4' ~ `~~, t ~ s~~e ~~,j~' -q~Y. s ~ ~` 1- ^E ~. CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING~ARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2007 2. Vegetation: None ' 3. Floodplain: NA 4. Canals/Ditches Irrigation: NA 5. Hazards: No hazards are known to exist on the site 6. Existing Zoning: L-O (Limited Office) 7. Lot Size: 0.70 of an acre f. Conditional Use Information: 1. Non-residential square footage: 4,913 square feet 2. Hours of Operation: 7:00 am to 7:00 pm Monday through Friday and Saturday 9 am to 7 pm g. Off-Street Parking: 1. Parking spaces required: 10 2. Parking spaces provided: 29 3. Compact spaces proposed: 10 h. Landscaping 1. Width of street buffer(s): 35 feet along Chinden 2. Width of buffer(s) between land uses: NA 3. Other landscaping standards: See 11-3B-8, Pazking Lot Landscaping, for internal parking lot landscaping requirements. i. Required dimensional standards for the L-O zone, per UDC 11-2B-3: Front setback: 20' Rear setback: 20' Interior side setback: 10' Maximum building height: 35' j. Summary of Proposed Streets and/or Access (private, public, common drive, etc.): Access to this site is provided from W. Everest Lane, a private street. Driveways aze proposed within a platted cross access ingress/egress easement for circulation within the site. No new access points or streets are proposed or approved with this application. ~~ 7. COMMENTS MEETING On April 13 2007, a joint agency and departments meeting was held with service providers in this azea. The agencies and departments present included: Meridian Fire Department, Meridian Pazks ~'`~ D artment, Meridian Public Works Department, Meridian Police Department, and the Sanitary ep Services Company. Staff has included comments, conditions, and recommended actions in Exhibit B below. 8. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS ,;,~ ':_~ {,; `,'. The 2002 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designates the subject property as "Mixed Use - Community." Per Chapter VII of the Comprehensive Plan, the Mixed Use land use category contains five sub-categories. "Generally, the mixed-use designation will provide for a combination of compatible land uses that are typically developed under a master or conceptual site plan. The purpose Liddell Vet Clinic CUP-07-006 Page 4 ~.:< •~~, `~' ~ ~ F, v: ~ c: } ;+ ~ n 'c `~ '_ jy e ~}G e'.~ r 4 c r, ' ~o ~1t f ~ `~' 'u i ~ ~F ~+(,y~ d n N ~, ! Y rY~y,~ ,'t'- ~ . ~"' ~~~ x :. Y A~ ~ ~~Y' !GZ~ K4 °~( ~` ENV ~ I <'~ y, M1 £h .~ HG~} ~~l 1F. ,~ ~ ~S` F ~ (' .rf~t' r ~f4 ~i• f !j~ i ~~"I] ~ ~yl Cl~ '~i '~~2Y iti;. ~ ~q4 ~ 7 ~ `~'' ~ ~° x ~ ~'. ~ ~~y i ~ ~1'2 ~I ~~~,+~ ~ 7 nsh z.i s _ ~ ~i ri-;` w ¢~ ~ r ~ ~~ x' 1:; ~~. , ~~~ ~ ~ . 1 ~ ~ S ~T ~~ , . ~ T ~N 4 x £ 39 a wr~,,-.. l' f. CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2007 ~I ~,Y ~.;._. ~_: '~~ a } ~...:_ ~~ , v°: ~;~~- >. ~.:; :. !, ,.. ~: ' ~; ,,F='j ~~~~°' ~.'' ~, Z;y I ~~ "•S~ ~,~' of this designation is to identify key areas which are either infill in nature or situated in highly visible or transitioning areas of the city where innovative and flexible design opportunities are encouraged. 'The intent of this designation is to offer the developer a greater degree of design and use flexibility." The following standards apply to the MiJ-C category: 1) Up to 25 acres may be non-residential uses and 2) Up to 200,000 square feet ofnon-residential building area is allowed. Staff finds that the request generally conforms to the stated purpose, intent, and standards of the MiJ- C land use category within the Comprehensive Plan. Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this property and apply to the proposed use (staff analysis in italics): • Chapter VII, Goal I, Objective B, Action 3 (page 109) -Locate small-scale neighborhood commercial areas within planned residential developments as part of the development plan. The subject property was included in the planned development for Lochsa Falls Subdivision. The proposed veterinary clinic will offer a needed service in this area and will be easily accessed by the surrounding residents of Lochsa Falls Subdivision. • Chapter VII, Goal I, Objective B, Action 5 (page 109) -Locate new community commercial areas on arterials or collectors near residential areas in such a way as to complement with adjoining residential areas. This site is located adjacent to Chinden Boulevard, an arterial roadway, and Lochsa Falls Subdivision, a residential development. The proposed veterinary clinic should complement the surrounding residential uses while providing amuck-needed service in this area. • Chapter V, Goal III, Objective D, Action 3 (page 43) -Require all new parking lots to provide landscaping in internal islands. The site plan indicates that internal parking lot landscaping will be provided on the site. • Chapter VII, Goal TV, Objective D, Action 2 (page 114) -Restrict curb cuts and access points on collectors and arterial streets. This site is not proposing and is not approved for direct access to Chinden Boulevard, an arterial roadway. Access to the site will be provided from W. Everest Lane, a private street within Lochsa Falls Subdivision. • Chapter TV, Goal I, Objective A, Action 6 (page 26) -Permit new residential, commercial, or industrial developments only where urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is contiguous to the City. City services can be provided to the subject property. Staff believes that the proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the surrounding uses. Staff recommends that the Commission rely on any verbal or written testimony that may be provided at the public hearing when determining if the applicant's request is appropriate for this property. 9. ZONING ORDINANCE a. Allowed Uses in Commercial Districts: UDC Table 11-2B-2 lists the permitted, accessory, and conditional uses in the L-O zoning district. Animal care facilities are a conditional use in the L-O ~ zone with the Specific Use Standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-1 (see Section 10, Analysis, for specific use standards). Liddell Vet Clinic CUP-07-006 Page 5 - aet ,ti: K,~ 5~ ~. ti~A F:~~r ~y a 4 ~~ ,1 f, t r },:ti Y~~ rrl i,; ~ k s ~~.;-~;,.. _ rc,,:~z ~.. ~. ~~ t~'~. ...> t e ,,, ', F t r Y' 1 ~~ ~ _ ~ ,,.Z. _ ~~,.: ~` ~ s ~' - r; , ~ i ~+, \° . ` ~ Y. ~ g .~~' $} Y k x S ~ ~ 1--~ yy7~ I,~ ,~' S t 1 Cud j 5 4 ~# t p ~ :. .~ ~~ q ~i 3 5`a if 41 ,~,~... :. ,' 'fir.. K ' (' ~ ~, x~.{. ~ t 3 , ti u, u k ~* :, $ ~Y ~ ~ C~ - ~ CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2007 b. Purpose Statement of Zone: The purpose of the commercial districts is to provide for the retail ~• 4. and service needs of the community in accord with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Four districts are designated which differ in the size and scale of commercial structures accommodated in the district, the scale and mix of allowed commercial uses, and the location of the district proximity to streets and highways. 10. ANALYSIS ~'~.~ a. Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation: Staff is generally supportive of the _ proposed CUP request as presented in the staff report, with the following comments: ~- CUP: Per UDC 11-2B-2, an animal care facility requires conditional use permit approval in the ~~, ~~ L-O zone. Further, Specific Use Standards apply to this type of use as follows: k ~~~~ Specific Use Standards for an Animal Care Facility, per UDC 11-4-3-1: 3 A. All animals shall be indoors at all times. x~ B. The facility owner and/or operator shall comply with all state and local regulations :~~ ,.; '~;~'° relative to such a facility and shall maintain housekeeping practices designed to prevent the creation of a nuisance and to reduce noise and odor to a minimum. "~`- Design Standards: Because the subject property is located adjacent to an entryway corridor, all structures proposed for the site are subject to the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19C, as '} ~ follows (staff analysis in italics): { 1. Architectural Character: -, a. Facades: Facades visible from a public street shall incorporate modulations in the s ;,,r ~ , i facade, roof line recesses and projections along a minimum of twenty percent (20%) ~ of the length of the facade. The proposed building incorporates modulations in the facade, roofline recesses and projections in excess of the required amount. ; ~ b. Primary public entrance(s): The primary building entrance(s) shall be clearly defined . ~,• by the architectural design of the building. Wmdows, awnings, or arcades shall total a 4'~ ~~`:'~ minimum of thirty percent (30%) of the facade length facing a public street. The ~ _ -. :~.I applicant's narrative states that the primary building entrance is defined by a S foot _ protrusion, built up pilasters, and EIFS gable containing an elevated fascia height. The windows shown on the north elevation (Chinden exposure-de-net total the required 30% of the fapade; c. Roof lines: Roof design shall demonstrate two or more of the following: a) ~ / . - overhanging eaves, b) sloped roofs; c) two (2) or more roof planes; d) varying ' ~• parapet heights; and e) cornices. The proposed roof design incorporates a sloped roof ^'v~ and overhanging eaves, which complies with this requirement. d. Pattern variations: At least two (2) changes in one (1) or a combination of the r ' following shall be incorporated into the building design: color, texture and/ materials. ': ,. = The building design incorporates EIFS (stucco) and cultured stone on the facade, which complies with this requirement. t .~; e. Mechanical equipment: All ground-level and rooftop mechanical equipment shall be '''~ screened to the height of the unit as viewed from the property line. The ground level ~,~& mechanical equipment will be screened at a height of 30" tall with an EIFS wall matching the color and texture of the main building facade, which complies with this . requirement. ~;' Liddell Vet Clinic CUP-07-006 Page 6 ~i a ~ ~'>>~ s5s _ k -:.~ ~ r',.-~ w d~~~ ~;h ~F~. f F $ ~q z r s~- ~ ~.J ti ~ ~ .. 1 "+ ,: C ~ 1 r,, i ~ r a~~e - ~` ~a ~ ~ ?~ .~. ~~~n „ 1 if~ •(. ~. (~ H } r.~ ~ ~ f e f ~ ~' 3 ~- I ~ -~ { ~ y~(~ Y ~1~ 4 ~L. i ~ qq ~y.., . ~~92!^}f. .. „z _ ~ ~yX if '' ~ ~a., ~~~ k~~ 1 ~~ ~ -]~ ~. ~ 1 4 - ~ S , F ~+ \ ~~ ~ ~~ l~ ~ 9 ._.. ~~K j 7 S {J r !j is l'6 i r '' xS ~~ ;.?; t- ~' y~ -< i , t ; y[f ~ ~ 3 {~ y! ~ ~ J~ ~~ k~{ ~. ~{ 1 ~ h k~ r', ' ~ i i i~r~ ~~a ~ r y! `a'tSt '1 ~ i'Y 6M y ~ ~ ~ Ti ~'#. t . ~ . i i.~" ^T c fir; y h.~ ~ - ~~ ~~5~ Y~ j"~ ;~- ~ { ~'~ f'k:.~.: ti:: .. i.'~'4:i CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2007 2. Color and materials: Exterior building walls shall demonstrate the appearance of high- quality materials of stone, brick, wood or other native materials. Acceptable materials include tinted or textured masonry block, textured architectural coated concrete panels, tinted or textured masonry block, or stucco or stucco-like synthetic materials. Smooth-faced concrete block, tilt-up concrete panels, or prefabricated steel panels are prohibited except as accent materials. The materials proposed for the exterior building walls are stucco and cultured stone, which complies with this requirement. 3. Parking Lots: No more than seventy percent (70%) of the off-street parking area for the structure shall be located between the front fagade of the structure and abutting streets, unless the principal building(s) and/or parking is/are screened from view by other structures, landscaping and/or berms. The site complies with this requirement. 4. Pedestrian walkways: ~I °- ~;; i ,, L;.,_ ;;~.~;; a. A continuous internal pedestrian walkway that is a minimum of eight feet (8') in width shall be provided from the perimeter sidewalk to the main building entrance. The walkway width shall be maintained clear of any outdoor sale displays, vending machines, or temporary structures. An 8 foot wide pathway is proposed from the perimeter sidewalk along W. Everest Lane to the main building entrance, which complies with this requirement. b. 'The internal pedestrian walkway shall be distinguished from the vehicular driving surfaces through the use of pavers, colored or scored concrete, or bricks. The internal pedestrian walkway will consist of scored concrete, which complies with this requirement. c. Walkways at least eight feet (8') in width, shall be provided for any aisle length that is greater than one-hundred fifty (150) parking spaces or two hundred feet (200') away from the main building entrance. This requirement is not applicable to this site. d. The walkways shall have weather protection (including but not limited to an awning or arcade) within twenty feet (20') of all customer entrances. The applicant's narrative states that the single customer entrance provided for this tenant space will have a 5 foot protrusion over it for weather protection. Dimensional Standards: The applicant shall comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC 11-2B-3 for the L-O zone. Staff has reviewed the site plan submitted with this application and found it to comply with the required dimensional standards of the L-O zone. Chinden Boulevard Right-of--Way: Idaho Transportation Department (TTD) has submitted comments on this application, contained in Exhibit B of this staff report, that request a building setback of 100 feet, measured from the centerline of Chinden Boulevard, for future highway expansion. The City requires a 35-foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to entryway corridors, outside of the required right-of--way. A 35-foot wide landscape buffer currently exists adjacent to Chinden Boulevard but it is within the area proposed for the highway expansion and will be removed when the highway is widened. Therefore, a new 35-foot wide buffer will be required adjacent to the highway. Five feet of landscape buffer exists to the north of this site beyond the required 100 feet and a 30-foot wide buffer will be required to be constructed on this site for a total of a 35-foot wide buffer. Because the parking shown along the north boundary of this site is located within the required buffer area, the northern parking is not approved. The proposed building location is 157+/- feet from centerline of Chinden, which is outside of the area planned for future highway expansion and the required buffer area. The proposed building location will Liddell Vet Clinic CUP-07-006 Page 7 ,x ~ ~~ ,r k i :, ~~' Y ~ 1 " -y .L ~,f .y ~ AZ } ~i 1 ~Xyx. t Y 3 P ( ,} ~ ~~ p~CL~ tr ~ ~. ~^~~; ~ Y ~ i ~ fiZ+ ~~ ~ 1~ A l~ '. ~ - O ~ ; .7 ~1 ~ 3 f ~ : ~ ~ . F.. 1 k i ~ 1 ~ ~ I y SST ~. ° ;~ - r ~r ~: ~ ~ i ~~ ,, ~ ~~ c, _. ^fka {{yr3~ x.' AVy~.~~_'~. _ 7t i;r a .~ ~w~p ~'" r#.:."- {fir +'~r t,;~.. -,:. i - ~~ ~ r. x r, ~ ~ ~ " ' er E a1i-. - ~ ra. t t ~ .,f7r `4S X , . r~ t __ ~~99Ei~,~ ~~~~~ y ~~~ ~~ s ~y~~ fi~ 33iD j I 1Y 4. { ~ r ~ } ~~`` t 1 ~~r~ s~'t ` ,t ~{~~5. 1 ;,'1i3 ~~ ~ n r' ~ ~ d .~_ v,l'F ~} srt ~ r. ~ ~~~ ~' r~' ^ kl z _ y~ µy ~.~ f CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2007 also still meet the required 20 foot rear setback required in the L-O zone. Staff is requiring that a 30-foot wide landscape buffer be constructed along the north boundary of this site outside of the 100-foot right-of--way needed by ITD for Chinden Boulevard (see Ezhibit B of this 'rj~' staff report). Access: Access to the site is provided from W. Everest Lane, a private street. Internal driveways are proposed within a platted cross access ingress/egress easement for circulation within the site. No new access points or streets are proposed or approved with this application. Parldng: In commercial districts, one off-street parking space is required per 500 square feet of gross floor area, per UDC 11-3C-6B. Based on the proposed 4,913 square foot facility, 10 parking stalls are required for this business. (The multi-tenant building in which this business will ~~ be located is proposed to consist of 6,862 square feet, which would require a total of 14 stalls for ; the site.) Twenty-nine stalls are provided (excluding the compact stalls shown along the north boundary that Staff is requesting be removed), which exceeds the number required. A bicycle ~'=~ rack is required to be installed on the site that is capable of holding a minimum of 2 bicycles and should comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-SC. ;';'`~ Site Plan: Staff has reviewed the site plan submitted with this application and found the following items need to be shown on a revised site plan: ~~ ~ • The planter islands shown in the parking lot shall contain a minimum of 50 square feet ~`-~~` and the planting area shall not be less than five feet in any dimension, measured inside 4~ ;' ~ ~, curbs, per UDC 11-3B-$C2a. ~ ~ I • Provide a bicycle rack on the site capable of holding a minimum of 2 bicycles (see UDC ` 11-3C-SC & 11-3C-6G). : ^`~ • All parking stalls adjacent to the sidewalk around the building shall be provided with a substantial wheel restraint to prevent cars from overhanging beyond the designated ' ~~', parking stall dimensions per UDC 11-3C-SB3. ~`'~' f • The parking stalls along the north boundary shall be removed and a 30-foot wide landscape buffer shall be shown along the north property boundary. (Five feet of .~~:. ,:`; landscape buffer exists to the north of this site beyond the required 100 feet for future highway expansion. If a 30-foot wide buffer is constructed on this site it will meet the 35- foot wide buffer requirement.) ~ ~.. Landscaping: The existing landscape buffer adjacent to Chinden was installed with the ~` -=~: subdivision improvements for Lochsa Falls Subdivision. Internal landscaping should be provided ``"' ' on the site in compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8, Parking Lot Landscaping. ~~ Staff has reviewed the landscape plan submitted with this application and found the following ~~ items need to be shown on a revised landscape plan: "} ' • Provide 2 additional trees within the 5-foot wide landscape buffer along the north property boundary, per UDC 11-3B-8C. • Landscape planter islands in parking lots shall contain a minimum of 50 square feet, and ~'~` the planting area shall not be less than five feet in any dimension, measured inside curbs ~; -<,. ~.:;, per UDC 11-3B-8C2a. • A 30-foot wide landscape buffer shall be shown along the north property boundary that w ~ ` complies with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. (Parking should be removed along the north boundary.) -- Liddell Vet Clinic CUP-07-006 Page 8 Lt ~'' ~ f S r tF '4, s T"K ~'~ ~; ~ ~ f ~ 3 4 ~*,, :H:.:2.n:~~ ~iy 5'~ 1' . J l ` .. ~ ~ ~,~ f ~~ S .y .J: n ~ -wt~... 1.` - ~tia'~~ a ': 1 y;. ;,:k ~. ~~hr p~ y"r~; ' - c ; -~ ~.F ' , ,'~,, t i , ~~~ N t ;; ~..;; ~, 3~ '~ 5~ ~ is ~ i .,s r ~)~y ~ ~ ~ irfF ~~ t{ k ~~ , 1' . T ij 4 ~ afi '~4'~ fi SU ~{`r, 4 7 _ ~Ki ~ ~' ~ ri .a. ~ r k' ry~; '~ '~ T ~~ f r 1 °~ ~ ~~ 1.~ . 4 4 ` r.4.~~ ~ ; 3x ~~ :+~ ~ ~* ~ ~ ' ;~ ~-~ ~ ti;a~_ ., SC r ifr~. ~..~ ~i7: -:: ~:~, ;~. ~~._; .F t~ j f;" i; . ~~ ;:~ ~Y-.. ~~' , ~~4 ~~' CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2007 Hours of Operation: The proposed hours of operation for the proposed vet clinic use are from 7 am to 7 pm Monday through Friday and 9 am to 7 pm on Saturday. Building Elevations: Elevations of the proposed building were submitted with this application and are attached in Exhibit A of this staff report. The proposed building shall be constructed in accordance with the elevations shown in Exhibit A and the design standards listed in UDC 11- 3A-19C as detailed above. Development along State Highways: Because the north boundary of this site is located adjacent to Highway 20-26, the standards listed in UDC 11-3H-4B regarding development along State highways, apply to the development of this property. Staff has reviewed these standards and except for the 35-foot wide buffer being located outside of the 100-foot future right-of--way, found the site to comply with the standards listed. Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC): A CZC was approved for the building on this site on April 3, 2007 (CZC-07-059). The applicant should submit a Revised CZC application with revised plans that comply with the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit B of this staff report, prior to establishment of the new use. All improvements must be installed prior to occupancy. b. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of CUP-07-006 for an animal care facility in the L-O zone for Liddell Veterinary Clinic, as presented in the Staff Report for the hearing date of May 3, 2007, based on the Findings of Fact as listed in Exhibit C and subject to the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit B. The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission heard this item on Mav 3 2007. At the Aublic hearing. thev moved to annrove CUP-07-006. 11. EXHIBITS A. Drawings 1. Vicinity/Zoning Map 2. Site Plan (dated: 3/15/07) 3. Landscape Plan (dated: 3/15/07) 4. Building Elevations (dated: 3/12/07) B. Conditions of Approval 1. Planning Department 2. Public Works Department 3. Fire Department 4. Police Department 5. Parks Department 6. Sanitary Service Company 7. Ada County Highway District 8. Idaho Transportation Department C. Required Findings from UDC Liddell Vet Clinic CUP-07-006 Page 9 ~- . ,. ~.. ~ ~cr ~~.~ ~ . ~ ~ f: _"; y ~. . }:. I xar ~ .~~p5~. ~3 x 3 "~ y f ~~~- 4 h ~YF~> ~ Y ~~~~~ Iv R ~ ~ ¢ -.d~ ,_si{~ ~ xis r i* ~: Xd w si~ ; t y ~ . g, • i .. .4 BFI t~ k A: ~ f ~}, ~ ~ r~i "1y~ ~}1 G ~~~ _ r _ ,. t ( " ~' r~ ~ 8 ' '+~ ' r ~ ~ y „ t ~ x-~:. Y K ~'J~ e ' t y ~_ ~ L ~.'~~ 4 ~i~ ~~ ~ ~ ~.. ~+~ i q 4 . +~^~. , b :~H~ k 3 )4 ,~..9' t s ~ t~'~ r _ ,_ .. i. -:1 .. t~ dJ ,1~.. ~ ~~, ~~~ ~. 3r _ L ' ,, 4 `'~,k r r i _ ~ 3Wy2 Y f4. y.. 7:my~ S ` /j ?'t p ,~: j ~ ''i i. . ~ ~ [ ~~~ ~ y ~ ~.'.dY~. f _.. ~. • CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2007 A. Drawings 1. Vicinity Map Exhibit A Page I • CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2007 2. Site Plan (dated: 3/15/07) r- r. ~~ is ,;~~5~.., 1! •:.~ r. i". '~ ~,~a ~'.. " /, i i r sTC ww oarw ..o.d au~r ~. ~ ,.. ~~.e as. wnrtam~~ qm~ Exhibit A NNR ~~ L_ ~ TP.~i ENCLA611I~ PIAM owNER ~~ R1 msOt IC GML iR~R'~O° w m a ARCHRECTIJRAL l1~I~A!' RO mfa~/S sTRUCnrRrt ~~ ~" ~a' Fcs ., ~•:~ ~~. ~Tf( ~ `}° ~ '~` E : J- .~ ~, ~~~ Fr.~` ~jy' mr G VK7NTY MAP NYR 6toYON ~ 6il~JiNM NNO ~~ ~~ TF65Ai EN0.0NNNE ELEMfSTNiN6 d 11AL 7ELTNIN Page 1 ry. a/ham'.. 4a~S r b_~.:7. ~~ y v Y~~ ~ ~? a,T 1 d ~,7a '9~F'' ,K;'a., ytY;' B{ f t 3 f Y ^"~*'~ . t ~ ~'~c' -. ~2 ,r : ; i-.' ~ .~, wFy. u~ ~ skv~, r zV ;~~ k i r, '~ ~~ ~'~ ) {} / ~~ + ~ M n.. 4 ti, ^8~'k~ S c art 1 1 ~' ~ t ~_?~. ~s ~f.', - S C kLY t Shy > e ~~~~~ of ~ i 4 r ~ :.~, x~ ?~f~ P /~ NAY ~}~~~_. , ~ - J b i~..-~.. y .s :`!' . n ary. ' g ~ w°. 4 ~ -Y 'ii ~4 ~t ~.> i. 1 .. • 1 N ~ ~~?L a -. i ~ ~~ : ~~. 7 e~ .'' 1s,'.. ~~~ 1 ® • CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2007 3. Landscape Plan (dated: 3/15/07) m wr`era r arm u~ra r r a~ ^ ~s ~sr w: Exhibit A ~~~~' owNQt R7 mial!! GML ~ ~~ R m0Y< R' ARGHREG7URAL so m~a~ es srRUCn~aL ~r~~ ~xrRrL MorEs ~r~v~~~wa'r iR~RA~~~~Yr~w ~OI'~u ~r ~~ w~~Yr~r~~s~~ L OY ~~~~ YiY ~y 51TE PLAN d M1OQ e 0 e J F Page 1 ~; ;' P ~,..'.- f~~i ~4';~`a< ",;~ ~k=~ w,.. CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2007 3. Elevations (dated: 3/12/07) m~~s~ ~ ~$ ~~\~ - -~ -' ` ~, -~-L- - - - _- - ------~- ~.P SOUTH EEEVATiO ~ -~-L T 1 ~ ,: - ~~~ 8 i~.e 91~,~ogf~®p~e_' ~_ ~'_P~ ~.~ ~~~~ ®~ ~ ~_ O 4 WEST ELEVATIO ~_, ___-__ ____1-~_ a _ ,_ _ ___s_~ ., v, ., --- -- -- Exhibit A KEY NOTES ~~ ~~s~E~~ w~o., ~~ ~a ~~o ~~,~o «~, ~.,~ u MATERIALS a ~~~ ~, may, ,~.a f 7~x~~W~ilPiv~ut vI r¢[R toa[c G ]0 rrt YtRi I.vB.&Kn Page 1 8 z 0 m W D 2 O m 2 J f EXTERIOR LEVATIONS A4.0 ~F ~.~ a~ i~~- , f ;%i ~ ~' ,. ~R. `s o k ~ ~ ~a, ~ l k~ +: V ~ , . i,. ~ Si ~~ 4 ' hN.: L.a9S~f - ~'~' S.~ ~ ~, '~ ~ RN l f 7 ~ ~ y1 ~t_ ~, ~ j1.% ~ f~ i T,1f ~ R _ L ~ t T t A4 } k~, ~ ' t F n~'1 ~ x ~~ C~ ~ F r 3Y w - - w~~~~ ^ ~ ~R y Tr~~5 ~h~~} ~; S~~ Y t£~~,~~ ~f~" ,~~(( F ~.:r: _ j `~ ~.~~r 7 a "1'~bi. t ~. ~ ~ 5 ~i~] F ~ ~ ~ G f~~ ~}~ ~S l s , e. , ~ ~ t ~ -ty, M~ ..~"1 ! E n ~'~` ~ jQt! ~I .. Y NNy~ ~. ~ i..:. ~l~A ~ ~ ~.. ~; - ~ J 7 ,j t {`~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ , ~" N L S{~ Y~ J x I~,F 1, t ti ~~ „~ l 'Va~i ~ 11Gk r~:_ t T' ~'+cs5. 4th `~~: . yi ~! CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2007 a ;;;~: r~: P f-' Y a ,t ~:>~ M k'-,~. ~~,;`. %>:;. `~ ~< -, i ,_~.~ _ B. Conditions of Approval 1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1.1 The site plan, prepared by Tomlinson Designs, dated March 15, 2007, is approved, with the conditions listed herein. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable conditions of approval associated with this site (AZ-02-010, PP-02-009, CUP-02-012, CUP-06-008, RZ-06-003, SHP- 06-001, SHP-06-002, CZC-07-059, and Development Agreement (Instrument No. 103012598 and 104033484). The applicant shall revise the site plan as follows: a. The planter islands shown in the parking lot shall contain a minimum of 50 square feet and the planting area shall not be less than five feet in any dimension, measured inside curbs, per UDC 11-3B-8C2a. b. Provide a bicycle rack on the site capable of holding a minimum of 2 bicycles (see UDC 11- 3C-SC & 11-3C-6G). c. All parking stalls adjacent to the sidewalk around the building shall be provided with a substantial wheel restraint to prevent cars from overhanging beyond the designated parking stall dimensions, per UDC 11-3C-SB3. d. The parking stalls along the north boundary shall be removed and a 30-foot wide landscape buffer shall be shown along the north property boundary. (Five feet of landscape buffer exists to the north of this site beyond the required 100 feet for future highway expansion. If a 30- foot wide buffer is constructed on this site it will meet the 35-foot wide buffer requirement.) 1.2 The applicant shall comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC 11-2B-3 for the L-O zone; no modifications to the required standards were approved with this application. 1.3 Provide a bicycle parking rack on the site capable of holding 2 bicycles that complies with the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-SC. 1.4 The applicant shall comply with the Specific Use Standards for an Animal Care Facility listed in UDC 11-4-3-1 as follows: a. All animals shall be indoors at all times. b. The facility owner and/or operator shall comply with all state and local regulations relative to such a facility and shall maintain housekeeping practices designed to prevent the creation of a nuisance and to reduce noise and odor to a minimum. 1.5 The applicant shall comply with the design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19C. 1.6 The applicant's design review application is hereby approved. The proposed building shall be constructed in accordance with the elevations shown in Exhibit A and the conditions of approval noted herein. +i, t• +~ ~• ~w ~ + scicupp:n-~cs~zca~~cx Qi~-~mgrcrcii~sH~PirPBt~'a~fRrfC~F$E3a~Pr~f6 •.i, rrr,r i ~ ~ n '~~~~ ~ gel~er~tic~t ,. ~i,:.,ao„ ~.,~e.,....a .,i,,,n ~e ~e,a..ea ~'OT ~CC VIII J8 ~~/'~Yj t}~~'C~"j ~~~t'L'If1'~"7'-~ ~~ Zn~~ ~~ }~e ~ i,_ Tmnii zn ~o~it.. 1.7 1.8 Exhibit B The hours of operation for the proposed use shall not exceed the hours from 7 am to 7 pm Monday through Friday and 9 am to 7 pm on Saturday. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan as follows: a. Provide 2 additional trees within the 5-foot wide landscape buffer along the north property boundary, per UDC 11-3B-8C. Page 1 ~~ ~Y' ~ ~S ~~ r ~ X Ate. { JF 5 ~y ~' _ ~ f f ' ~_ N. ~. '. ; ~ . .. F l'~:~ v ~ .~ ~+, ,M"' _ i ~ ~,. af. t ~ r'-t ~y ~ Z' X( .~ ~ f~7~~Jj'.f ,' ~" irrk ~y YI G b, , au h j r•3 ~~ , ~ ~t V .r ~ . jj x 3 'L ~Ft ~~'~'~ ~ ?~ it4 . 1yy1 *~,,, n. ~. ~1 y;., ,~{ v., ~ i {J. .~ .i {_ ~ ~~ ti~ F i,H~ti ~ :~t a ~4 '.'~.~ Z' ~y~J ~): ~~ ~ir 4': ~' ~ rd (. , ` f~ 'F- `~ ~ ~ 7' 4'~ fi s { ~ f ~ 4 ~ y~rtc k- d F } , ; . > ~ iwd`z. A ~ ~ 4 C ~, 61.+1:'2 }; CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2007 ~ ;,f: b. Landscape planter islands in parking lots shall contain a minimum of 50 square feet, and the planting area shall not be less than five feet in any dimension, measured inside curbs per UDC 11-3B-8C2a. ',, c. A 30-foot wide landscape buffer shall be shown along the north property boundary that complies with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. (Parking should be removed in this location along the north boundary.) 1.9 The applicant shall submit a Revised Certificate of Zoning Compliance application with revised plans that comply with the conditions of approval listed herein, prior to establishment of the new ~:w= use. u 1.10 All required improvements must be complete prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy for the ~~ proposed development. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be obtained by providing surety to the City in the form of a letter of credit or cash in the amount of 110% of the cost of the ~' ` required improvements (including paving, striping, landscaping, and irrigation). A bid must accompany any request for temporary occupancy. 1.11 No new signs are approved with this CUP application. All business signs require a separate sign ~:_;;,. ,: permit in compliance with the sign ordinance. 1.12 The Applicant shall have a maximum of 18 months to commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval listed above. If the business has not begun within 18 months of - approval, a new conditional use permit must be obtained prior to operation. 2. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2.1 Public Works has no concerns with this application. ?;'~ 3. FIItE DEPARTMENT '~ 3.1 The proposed project has no fire department concerns. Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations ,,i'. , shall be by the Meridian Fire Department. 3.2 Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Fire Department and water quality by the Meridian Water Department for bacteria testing. 3.3 Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department. ~' a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 %z" outlet face the main street or parking lot aisle. x; ` i b. The Fire hydrant shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it. a., ~'z z:. ~~ ~~~~ ~:.. ~, , , . ~:,~_`. ~~ ...: ~~ ~~, .- :.~, ,. ~:' $,~ Vie.; K ^' .~ 3.4 3.5 c. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works specifications. d. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on corners when spacing permits. e. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'. f. Fire hydrants shall be place 18" above finish grade. g. Fire hydrants shall be provided to meet the requirements of the IFC Section 509.5. h. Show all proposed or existing hydrants for all new construction or additions to existing buildings within 1,000 feet of the project. All entrance and internal roads and alleys shall have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48' outside radius. For all Fire Lanes provide signage "No Parking Fire Lane". Exhibit B Page 2 ,_. ~ ~h - , o, _ ~,-~ y }r~' t FGi~ ~ ~ a ~~ .. t. . ~ .`!'~" ; ~ ~ .. s x ., r x , >~ , !y T !'~~...s ~ .r ~ i _. u r ~-' #r x c +` ~ Tt ` z S yt :,~.. k ~~: y A~.~ ~ 7FT'.3' ~k., _ ~ ~ ~~ S ~~~ t 1 ^' 'r ~ 'ri ~r "{'i~A r: µt ~ y . ~~ * { ~ / ~ r r ~ z ,. ~~ ~ r F ~ ~ ~~ ~r 1 ~ r~r;Q ~~a A r'>, l' +~ ~ ! ~ _ x ~~Lw't , . . 5^ ,. p , .1 ..ti:.r1f. yy((~~ Sf Y ~ fyf f;~*. '{~Af`j~r ~ ^C , ~ ~ i ~'i fit ~ - ~3L}Y t~® , L ~~~ i d '~~ - ~ i ~~s r .i W+.«; ~, ;. s~.j.'f~C~ 4 t ~ 1 LM N s CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2007 ~;.. -`' ~~; <.°~`. ~~b+', R-' ~_,-. ~ •'~ 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13 3.14 3.15 3.16 3.17 3.18 3.19 3.20 Insure that all yet undeveloped parcels are maintained free of combustible vegetation. Fire lanes, streets, and structures including the canopy height of mature trees shall have a vertical clearance of 13'6. Operational fire hydrants, temporary or permanent street signs and access roads with an all weather surface are required before combustible construction is brought on site. Building setbacks shall be per the International Building Code for one and two story construction. Commercial and office occupancies will require afire-flow consistent with the International Fire Code to service the proposed project. Fire hydrants shall be placed per Appendix D. The fire department requests that any future signalization installed as the result of the development of this project be equipped with Opticom Sensors to ensure a safe and efficient response by fire and emergency medical service vehicles. This cost of this installation is to be borne by the developer. Maintain a separation of 5' from the building to the dumpster enclosure. Provide a Knox box entry system for the complex prior to occupancy. The first digit of the Apartment/Office Suite shall correspond to the floor level. The applicant shall work with Planning Department staff to provide an address identification plan and a sign which meets the requirements of the City of Meridian sign ordinance at the required intersection(s). All aspects of the building systems (including exiting systems), processes & storage practices shall be required to comply with the International Fire Code. All portions of the buildings located on this project must be within 150' of a paved surface as measured around the perimeter of the building. Provide exterior egress lighting as required by the International Building & Fire Codes. There shall be a fire hydrant within 100' of all fire department connections. Buildings over 30' in height are required to have access roads in accordance with The International Fire Code Appendix D Section D105. 4. POLICE DEPARTMENT 4.1 The Police Department has no concerns related to the site design submitted with the application. 5. PARK5 DEPARTMENT 5.1 The Parks Department has no concerns with the site design as submitted with the application. 6. SANITARY SERVICES COMPANY 1. SSC has no comments related to this application. 7. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT 7.1 The previous conditions and requirements for MAZ-02-010, MPP-02-009, and MCUP-02-012 for Lochsa Falls Subdivision also apply to the subject application. 7.2 Prior to fmal approval you will need to submit plans to the ACRD Development Review Department. Exhibit B Page 3 ~i ~a#~ ti~~~i .~~ ~~;r ( ~; S fi 1' ~ I -~ y 5~. qC ~: l#31~~r r~~ ~ b j~ ~ ' ' : ~ ,.~J~~ li s F ?. -~. ~ i~.vr ' 4 x, C 7 4`* ~ 1 46 ~_. a" a 1 ~ ~ ~ u ,~ ~ a rr. cF~ "' ~" ~"~+: 4 ,~~ ! ; r ~ 1 ~ 'Fi~~'. zl ~, F ~ t } ?j ~ ~f~~ f f JF~~c ~~ ~y ~ pp Tp ~ ~-- ~A 4 S 4~y~~ 4 ,r ~: pr }UH''`F '~'~~C `~ . , 4 s ~. ~,+r _ ,. J. i~ i l~,}~. } 3~ ti% ~ r'6 .e`t ~ i~, X ,N:~ x P m.<~ C~J tip y~ j f.; Yfi ~ ~ F~~~4! `3. - . ~. xw ~ , 3"t~, I ~ tGT r,-~i. L l q= 1 S CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNINGS ARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2007 7.3 A traffic impact fee will be assessed by ACRD and will be due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Contact ACRD Planning & Development Services at 387-6170 for information regarding impact fees. 8. IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 8.1 Access to this site should be provided from W. Everest Lane only. 8.2 We are requesting a setback of 100 feet from the highway centerline for future highway expansion. 8.3 Noise abatement (berms, fences, etc.) will be the responsibility of the developer and will be constructed off of the State right-of--way. Exhibit B Page 4 1 • CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2007 C. Required Conditional Use Permit Findings from UDC ;L~,;; The Commission shall base its determination on the Conditional Use Permit request upon the following: 1. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located. The existing site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and comply with the dimensional and development regulations of the L-O zoning district, including the preservation of the 100-feet ofright-of--way for Chinden and the 35-foot wide landscape buffer. -~ Off-street parking is required at the ratio of one space per 500 square feet of gross floor area in commercial districts (UDC 11-3C-6). Fourteen off-street parking stalls are required for this site based on the total square footage of the building; twenty-nine are provided. The applicant complies with this requirement. Further, the proposed building location complies with the setbacks of the L-O district. Staff recommends the Commission rely on Staffs analysis and any oral or written public testimony provided when determining if this site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use. ~'~' 2. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accord with the requirements of this Title. The Commission finds that the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designation for this property is Mixed Use -Community. The property is currently zoned L-O, which complies this designation. The proposed use is generally harmonious with the requirements of the UDC (See Sections 8 and 10 above for more information regarding the requirements for this use). 3. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other `~~< uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. ~! 1, . , =:~a ,:yq::, v c ~ •. .. - ',' ~': ,. 35,.. .tl N.F y,: eL ry '~ ~ ~~_. ~:r~~~ The Commission finds that, if the Applicant complies with the conditions outlined in this report, the operation of the proposed use should be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing and intended character of the area. Further, the Commission believes that the proposed use will not adversely change the essential character of the area. 4. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. The Commission finds that, if the Applicant complies with the conditions outlined in this report, the proposed use will not adversely affect other property in the area. 5. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools, parks, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer. The Commission fmds that the site will be adequately served by the previously mentioned public facilities and services. 6. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. If approved, the Applicant will be fmancing any improvements required for development. The Commission finds there will not be excessive additional requirements at public cost and that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the community's economic welfare. Exhibit C Page 1 ~~ ~~:`5~ }, ;,~;~~, t`, n.4:~ 4. i y~~,. ~ ~r "'r t~% _ d 'v~F- f ~rv ~ .ti:~ a a G k ` 4 i ~ r'",.r rc+ , ~ R v~ y ~°3e ' ~} ~~ ;: i ~ ~; ~ ` ~~ ~ 1 tiu ~. ,~ ~~; .r 5 ~ ~ f as L ~# L-u : b ~~ t ,Sl~'.M ~h 1-:_* .. ~ ~. y ~{he ~P ~.4 +~ ~~,~~ ~. q /~ r _. < .. } ~ h~ 1i:' ~ z ~ ~~~ ~~ 1 ^ t # N R , CCxx '"L. ~ ~ ti ~t _ i Mk }{f~' ~F ~p h k'.r lk',e7''S1 ,'..t t i ~P ~~ F C K~ r1 Lie" Y ~ • P ri. ~~ @ ~~ ~ f r. }~ }} ~~ ~ . „j ~ ~A , ~y ..,, ~ :! rh' .. y ' ~ ~ ~ ~F ~ y !~ y sy ""~ .~ k 4 f "~,,:.. { E f' y ~';. ~, y$1 ~.~~'~' s~ '` .,:~ f ~l ~. . ~.. ~f CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING ~ TMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2007 7. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. Staff recognizes that traffic and noise is a concern; however, Staff does not believe that the amount generated by the proposed new use of the property will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare of the public. Staff does not anticipate the proposed use will create excessive noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. 8. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature considered to be of major importance. The Commission fords that there should not be any health, safety or environmental problems associated with the proposed use. The Commission finds that the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of any natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. Exhibit C Page 2 • May 14, 2007 PFP 07-001 ~~~ MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ BONING MEETING May 17, 2007 APPLICANT Walker Homes, InC. ITEM NO. 4 ~•, : - - REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from 5/3/07- Preliminary /Final Plat approval to to subdivide Lot 13, Biock 3 of Vallin Courts Subdivision to create two (2) new lots for for Benewah - 2673 North Ridgebury Avenue f~. AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See Previous Item Packet /Attached Minutes CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: See Attached Staff Report ~'~'~ CITY ATTORNEY ~ ~`~ CITY POLICE DEPT: Y~~~''.- CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: .:,;:'III .f~ CITY WATER DEPT: ...,~_; ~`r~~~'i CITY SEWER DEPT: y:' ~ ~ CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ''"~'" ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ~~~ CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: See Attached Comments r~:; NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: s' ""' INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: ~.~, OTHER: See Affidavit of Sign Posting ' •~ Contacted: Date: Phone: ~. _ Emailed: Staff Initials: '' `, -~'~ Materials presented at pubNc meetings shad become property of the City of Me~dlan. t~ F tv ~~ X fY' F~x s; ~+x ~T.`~.j~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y y .: Y ~ f ~ r. , „...;~, .X.. r 4c _ 3'~~`~°~t-~ - t jz{~ y a ~* ~k ~ti Y ~k ;~ ~ :~ ~ ~ o~, - ~~~ ~ ~ fr { .c i ~ r, m377E+~ £~. ~ ~~• t 3 ~ r: t. 5 ~ ~: ct ~. 3g ~,- , { ~ ~ X 1 ~ ~~ ~~ ~ _ ~ . S 1 - ~ ~, ~ y ~ ~W. ~' a~ r }k ~ ~K. ~ . h, k . f ~ l ~ ' Y ~ ~-!-~. _ _ 15 G ~, t ;;~ ~ " ~ ~ y~ ~ f~ 1 - }+ ~~ . t4 ,~.r~; ~. - f T 4S' ~ Y~ .. .", ,~. ~ e ea.µ . _ . ~~. ::: ~. 'i 4 ~~ ~~,-. ,_ ~ ~ May i 4, 2007 P P 07-009 MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING May 17, 2007 APPLICANT Tovchmark of the Treasure Valley, LLC ITEM NO. 5 REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from 5/3/07- Preliminary Plat approval of of 52 residential lots, 2 office /commercial lots & 10 common lots on 19.80 acres in an L-O zone for Meadowlake Village North -SEC of Franklin Road and Touchmark Way AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See Previous Item Packet /Attached Minutes CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: See Attached Staff Report CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: ^ CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: See Attached Comments SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: See Attached Comments CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: See Attached Comments SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: See Affidavit of Slgn Posting Contacted: Date• Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly o4 the City of Meridian. ~ ~~ `: yq i a(n'~ i ' i "' t ~ ~ p{ 1 ~ ir• ~~~;Z ~ ' yf ~tt: ~~ ~x ~, ^ ~ l: y ~~~4. .~ ~~f ;~ - 1 W..'j. ~ 1.' ~~'. { ,~ i ' PVC 4 :{:~, a t~v z~ ' [ } N k a'. ; ~~ ~ 'y<y e 1 ~. ~ ~ ~ 2 t ~'~' . ~ 5 ~ t,~E,;. ~~ '^ t f i' f` k s 3er ~'l-+ 1~ f~ t ~ ~. i;.. L f ,-r. , R ~~~ , ~ IN~,~ ~`t f ,~ ~ ~ +t }~ij~~ ~ , ° ? ~: tC~; ` H ~ ~ '¢ t i ° ~~~ xr ~ •,4 ~H ~`. { ~ N 1 ~`'~ {'. 31~ f I #~ ,r ~ ~ 4 r ~ S ~~'r ~ +~ lE4~}'~~ k ` g ~w i ° ~ *~r t ~ , 3 ';: u 5 ~~., '~.0' ~i ~" ~' r `Yy~ ~Y~~ }r'i ~ ~~ A y s; ~` _~ ;:;:- `~ .~ ~~~~ 4 i+ G;~ r -'. ><~: i.ip~~ • May 14, 2007 CUP 07-008 MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING May 17, 2007 APPLICANT Touchmark of the Treasure Valley, LLC ITEM NO. 6 REQUEST Continued Public Hearing from 5/3/07 -Conditional Use Permit approval to create 52 residential lots, 2 office/commercial lots and 10 common lots in an L-O zone for Meadowlake Village North -SEC of Franklin Road and Touchmark Way AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See PP Packet CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Inifials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the C{ty of Meridian. , ~~:.: . w~,~~ .. J ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~ x ~! x.50 .Sp. Y t v ti ~1L. ~,r xv +v ' FF 4~ '*~ ~ H e F jay ~ . ~~ j ; ~V ~ 4 ' ~ i , r ~ RJ!J~ _ ~ k~ h :. ~~ ~~~~~ ++ SST ~r ,~ W L ti74b~ ~~44i 1 ~y +~Ci~.'?~ ~j`" /r[, - ' t Sri ~ ,~ `.~ '. E j,~h)~+ . ~~ h z , F.' 3$'. f .Y Y ;~ F y . r' 4`v 3t ~ ~ N ~r y r ~ _ * ,: y d ~ J.t~ r ~ '~~ 1ti ~~ - - ~ ,~ , , ~ ¢ r ~'~ i .f ~ } '~~ y ~ ~ f .1' ; r Y~i . ~it ~~ f "' ° 7 f 'S,z '+ r~ ^' ``f t~ fi U t: ~ ~~-~ ! . ~ J . , 5 5 k 1 14 i~` ~ .. ~~~~ {{{{ Y ~1 r~~~'3 P: ~ { {R~ 17 . . 3 ~' .L '~ kJ~ • `' ~ May 14.2007 RZ 07-009 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING May i 7, 2007 APPLICANT Joint School District No. 2 ITEM NO. 7 REQUEST Public Hearing -Rezone of 24.69 acres from I-L to C-G zone for Jabil Southeast - 1303 East Central Drive (Portion of Lot 1, Block 1 of the Jabil Subdivision). AGENCY #~, 4f. _'~, Fe s: :; ~. .:: ~~y ,.: ~~a CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: Contacted: Emailed: Date: Phone: Staff Initials: Materials pr®aented at public me®Hngs shall becorrr® property of the City of Meridian. ,y <~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ } ,g5~1~~i+r 1J ~G ~ 'ri hw~y~ t i £1':~ } om ~1 ~'~':~r"-. A'. I } ~i~ 4 f ~ F ~„ ~ Nom; 1 MY ~4'~~ ]~ ~ ~ ~ Y Y j«~.8 dl.. ~, ~. r^- ~v ., ~ ~' `" r` ~,~ ; y yr,%-~, 1~ ~~ i\-K M TMF 4. r 'FJ -',, x 4'~~ta~ ~T t .i . ~3 h J' ~,N ,y H''~. r t" r ,, ^' +j } ~~t ~ r ~ !fit i ~w... d _ r 4W+f t. \4, J r ' ~ ., 1 ~. ~~~ x~~ d 11.'ti, µ~r~~ ~:..: l ^ ~ ~ i ~' T T hY ~ 2 pp t~~_ ~ ~f ~, ~'k '4 ~ r~ ~ ~ kyle ~~'..:~: . x f ~ 1 w a ~ ~ ~'K:~' .e~ ~, t t ' ~ 1 '' y ~ ~ +H'. ~ ~ , o ~ t ~:al i~ "`i s a { ~4+sh.Y ~ . A' C COMMENTS See Attached Staff Report No Comment No Comment See Attached Comments r; f t ;•~ 1 ` ` =, ~f~ ~ • ~~~. May 14, 2007 PFP 07-002 MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING May 17, 2007 APPLICANT Doug Tamura ITEM NO. S ~~t; REQUEST Public Hearing -Combined Preliminary/Final Plat request to subdivide Lot 4, Block 1, Devon Park Subdivision No. 2, to create two new lots for Devon Park North - ~~-` 1960 North Lakes Place. AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: { ~~ ~,.~k~ ~_.. ~~ - . . ~, :,: ;: ~~:: t ~., ~` ~. ~~,, CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: See Attached Staff Report No Comment See Attached Comments See Attached Comments See Attached Comments SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: ^ IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: See Attached Comments OTHER: See Affidavit of Sign Posting __ Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meeHnps shall become property of the City of Meridian. ~ r ti. o'~~~~ ~ - }} a £4a' ~ :y~~ ~. ~ ~~ i ~ ,~•° " ~~ k ~~ ~ ~t'yet C y~ F r, 7 t f ~,~kTY~M~?- i y~ • - r ~ a- . , . ~c.„~ ~`J w~-4~ r ~ , . ~ ,,,„~;~~ /' F Sjd.'f-P' . l 4~4 , !'1,.'.Jd~. L ~ , „z '' i~ ii Frw~w ~ ~ ' ~~ ~ i~ ~ ~~~ .'1 . F;~ ~C~' If~ ~ ~ A~~~ t 3 `~ y'~~ ._ k a ~ ^ , '~ . z .~,p c~ k~H v 1 ~ ~ ~. p r, ~~~fi ' i ,y. !ti ' ~ ` ~~ tiy~l K. y fYk 4i ~~~.:~; i a . 1'" "` r ~* ~ ~" ~~s~~;;i ~i -r' .y; _ gg ~E ~~ ~,, a it ~ µ. ~ ~1'y,~.,~, ~E ~ ~ <<~ x~'~"~~ ~" '- May 14, 2007 RZ 07-007 MERIDIAN PLANNING Si ZONING MEECING May 17, 2007 APPLICANT Maria Vanbragt ITEM NO. 9 REQUEST Public Hearing -Rezone of 0.19 of an acre from an I-L to an O-T zone for the property located at 305 W. Broadway Avenue for Van Bragt Property - 305 W. Broadway Avenue AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: See Attached Stan Report No Comment See Attached Comments See Attached Comments OTHER: See Affidavit of Slgn Posting Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: MaFedals presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meddlan. {{k • M ~k L 1 h _. st~{IT 2YY'f ~ " 4~ , ' _ > ~ ~k.P a r .: t 1A? { f ~'S y~'h. •_ ~~ ~ 4 ~~A ~~~. ~ t ~.. yy ~}~ }"L Y; ~ ~ ~~~ `'~,~.~ ry . n~~cL b ~\~~# ~' ~3 2~;,,~ " %ti ~+~ ; x _ , _i rt'k i. v , P7' t r ' t ~ ~~ 4~ * - Hfi rN ~? ~~r a~ E k ~ ! r_~ i F~ .5 ~ } ,{~ ~yh, :, ll. I. ~ ',T t J F ' ~ H 6~".. ~v ;~ ~1' fF1+C ~ ~j` 1 Ea ~ . o- 1r . ~' }} W dk :'1 e a 1 :. ~f '` z 1~' r «7F,,= r - : s i Fx t ~'r+~ Ili ' k~ e- 4. a ~ ~~~~ i ~~ ~ w 4y ~~ 4rt. ~ n~.~~~: :~fr~-y~' ~! iial~ S~^ ~%' f 4 4d~ aP t'~' Y ~~ ' . rJu t.ki% }, ~ C ~ „ a ~ 1i p ~.S`y` y FtS ~~ { May 14, 2007 AZ 07-006 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING May 17, 2007 APPLICANT Stanley Consultants ITEM NO. REQUEST Public Hearing -Annexation 8~ Zoning of 94.69 acres from RUT to a C-G zone for Pinebridge -south of E. Fairview Avenue, east of N. Locust Grove Road and west of N. Eagle Road AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: See Request for Continuance No Comment See Attached Comments See Attached Comments See Attached Comments See Attached Comments INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: see Attached Comments OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emalled: Staff Initials: Materials presented at pubtlc meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. .x ~, ~~: <, r~ } ~ . ~ ,r. r ~i ~+~ ~~, a I ~~ t~ x~. j ~ ~~ ~~ rx'~ ~~ a s> R ~~~ ` ., _ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~}} 1 ~. q hr :x3. Y ~ ~ ~:' ' ~r ~ t, _ a~~ ~ .' ~.1R ~ 6 k ~ s r' R W 1 ~ r. t • . w~~ - ~ . f ~, f~ 3{ ~~ ~ ~ { ~ 'Y3yL~rcFP.". o,t ti~ +} t~~ 7 ~Tih - i~ x t :'fir. ~ ~tT '•.- ~L.. ~i ~. .'~. «irrel~t ~ :tau - ~ ~ ~~r3'- ''^~1 ~ _ ~ Ir YS ~. ' e: ~ K . j ~ y ~ ~ •~ ~9 ~ ~ ~~ ~r~' b 2r ~ J ~ ~ i M ~~. ~'~ 4 R~ ,,$ 1. ~,,~., << ~. ~'fi~ May 14, 2007 RZ 07-010 MERIDIAN PLANNING Z~ ZONING MEETING May 17, 2807 APPLICANT Stanley Consultants ITEM NO. REQUEST Public Hearing -Rezone of 75.67 acres from I-Land L-O zone to a C-G zone for Pinebridge -south of E. Fairview Avenue, east of N. Locust Grove Road and west of N. Eagle Road AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See l0-Z Packet CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY i.; CITY POLICE DEPTi CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING bEPT: f CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: AAatedals present®d at public meetings shall become property of fhe CHy of Meridian. ,, ., ~ 3 ~ ~~~ a ~~ ', ~ •'~: ,. a~ ~ `*`+r.~. y yy Y Y r ''+.t' f ~ S' ~-~C~i'. ~~. ~'G 1"~,, tf y' }, ~~3 ~ y ~~ + h ~ ~ ~r ,t' y '. + '7%+F~3 s Y $ i. ~: s u ~' ~7n~1i,.:, d ~~~~~: ~NNt>, ~ 4 xb~`~Y~~ ~~ j ~ 2 ~~ ~ t: ~ 7 ~ ~' rye{- .r«, yy:{x.,. ~ , ~1. } ~~r ~ y :.,f:F,y ,.- ~ aSX,`~,>~a h;i,- ~ 3Q ~i' i r !a ~C77' I, } ~ CFL r q~ r ~. .. 4 ® • ~;~`; ,~_ ~:,; ¢' May 14, 2007 PP 07-008 MERIDIAN PLANNING 1~ ZONING MEETING May 17, 2007 APPLICANT Stanley Consultants ITEM NO. ~ 2 REQUEST Public Hearing -Preliminary Plat of 61 building lots and 21 common lots on 170 +/-acres in a proposed C-G zone for Pinebridge -south of E. Fairview Avenue, east of N. Locust Grove Road and west of N. Eagle Road _ AGENCY COMMENTS --- CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meridian. y.r ii'- t° ~~ 'i L~f,~ `? ~ ffiJ ~ t rr. a .~ \ t '~' Y 1 . ~ ~t ~ ~, F FH ~~ arfi r' ~~L. , .~Y . t k+r P ~'~"v r p _ ~x b.:,: r ; ,.:::s~R S~, ,.., ~' _ . , ~ '. ~ ~ a r~~ 4 i ~` .;~,- 1 A ~ S l r th r;~.r3. ~ .~ ai:4~'.. } " ' Y ~ ~ ~ ' 1F' ~i~ J' j.Y 4 ~ { ~ i 4 gF:: ''y#. ~3~CT+i~ ". . , : i t 4 ~~ Fes} ~~ t ' !~ ' ~~ S ~ 5 .~ iii;:,-. 7 .~..' } ~'f .,~S~J'~x -, =,7 Y ' 1 ~ \ t:~ j ~ r f ltY~ ~ '3~ * _ ~i , ~. May 14, 2007 AZ 07-008 MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING May 17, 2007 APPLICANT JR LLC ITEM NO. ~ 3 REQUEST Public Hearing -Annexation and zoning of 3.32 acres from R1 to C-G zone for Zamzows Overland - 3620 and 3650 East Overland Road. AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: See Attached Staff Report CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: No Comment CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: See Attached Comments CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: No Comment NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: See Attached Comments SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: WTERMOUNTAIN GAS: ~ OTHER: See Affidavit of Slgn Posting/See Attached Site Plan/ Response by Doug Zamzow Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City o! Meridian. ~~r.~ h ~ ,~,, _'ti._ ~y~) ,7_. Y V ~'t S' ~:' ~ C: F~ 7 ~~a~y ~-~ ..; Cr +.~~3 Q;. ~ ~~~~~•. 4 >r'::-. T ; r~~Fr ry" .,., t ~. 1 S~. ~~ Ski' S , ~ + t %'r *~ ~ T~'.:~?' f f ~A a x ~, ~:; to ~r,r '; ~Y ~? ~ ~ ~~ l<~~ t ~`~ ~' ~r1'~'F1 ~ 2 t' ~~ ~ :+~,'. ~ezl~ 3~ r , i• , _ a~ ~xt ~~' ~3, r{a` FZ ni; ~ 7 ~ ,~~ Mrs Q x 4 Y.f`~~~. ~; a x v. '-. :i rat, ` i - 3 ~, sy~`:, y' r ~ '~~: ,~:. May 14, 2007 CUP 07-011 MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING May 17, 2007 APPLICANT Gene Strate ITEM NO. ~ 4 REQUEST Public Hearing -Conditional Use Permit for 12multi-family residential units on one acre in an R-15 zone for Strate Apartments - 911 East Pine. AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: See Request for Continuance CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: No Comment CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: See Attached GOmmerfts NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: See Attached Comments SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: See Attached Letter by Paul W. McKague Contacted: Date: Phone: Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at public meetings shaft become properly of the Clty of Meridian. ,t . yy a , 3 x c` :tip T ~~ ~I~, i ~ ~'~f ~ d~ ,~ C F t .t# ~ ~ )! "~ j Fl ' r ,t s. ~k '~' ~,}'~ r ~~ ~ ~' Y.. ~~ ~ ~ , a r KN rvJ~r~j 1 4. r F k; u Rri~i~-i,.. ~, ar r 4.y~.-.° ,fJY ~l7~',':~-- - z y 1 -~~ ~r~ ~ f yy ~ 3~ T L~~ ,t - ,9 - - Y ~ K `~ ~ ~- - SY~j~{ ~ ~} ~ ~C1~ ~ ~. J Y h + ra Y ~' a' ; J ~~ y + ~ i ~,^ / (• N i y f~~ i 7_ ~ ~ ~ T 4g~~~.~ 1~ xq ~ ( .. +. ~r~e ~.~ ~ ., ~ y -~}_ fi'£ f ?'N f f Y+ ~F 9 ~ . ~~ u~' :. ;~? May 14, 2007 ZOA 07-001 MERIDIAN PLANNING 8~ ZONING MEETING May 17, 2007 APPLICANT City of Meridian Planning Department ITEM NO. ~ Jr REQUEST Public Hearing -Zoning Ordinance/Unified Development Code {UDC) Text Amendment to modify, clean up & add specific sections to the UDC (see application for details of all sections proposed for amendments) for Unified Development Code Text Amendment #2 AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICES: COMMENTS See Attached Statf Report No Comment ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ''" CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: "7' NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: See Attached Comments s=~~ SETTLERS' IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: z': Contacted: Date: Phone: ~;, Emailed: Staff Initials: Materials presented at pubtlc meetings shall become properly of the City of Meridian. s, ~ ~,' 4 : ,,. ~s ~. 2 { i 3~ ~ ~~5 R' ~ pV G~ Y~ y 4 (~ lI: ~i:. Y~ e.;~1r F ~ 5. ~§ ~tti s ^ '3r Sa ja ;-1;. :~ a ' p, sY ,~ ~ r ~"r~" k ~ '~ , i ` F ~~Ln~ {~ ~ r 5 -~ ~- a ~a;K ~~ '~ ZS ~' ~ ~~ , ~ ~ ~q `~ ~ % 7 ~ t F 5 „ ~~~ ~ t ~~$ ~~'' N}t tt i~~y. W r r ~a ~ " ~y, w * L i v ..~~ ~" ~ v h ! 'I i ~ ~~ k~ `' . i ~ ~ y 444 t f ~~.x ~ .. 4; t~ ~' ~. C 1*y a~'. ~ ~: ~ ~ e~ ~rs~ ::~. s 1 ti t h` yr 'i